Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Warn of Possible BitTorrent Meltdown

secmartin writes "Researchers at Delft University warn that large parts of the BitTorrent network might collapse if The Pirate Bay is forced to shut down. A large part of the available torrents use The Pirate Bay as tracker, and other available trackers will probably be overloaded if all traffic is shifted there. TPB is currently using eight servers for their trackers. According to the researchers, even trackerless torrents using the DHT protocol will face problems: 'One bug in a DHT sorting routine ensures that it can only "stumble upon success", meaning torrent downloads will not start in seconds or minutes if Pirate Bay goes down in flames.'"

294 comments

  1. So... by senway · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And nothing of value was lost?

  2. Re:Is it me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I agree. It's getting weirder and weirder and some things I used to know how to do I can't figure out.

  3. The market will find a way by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Might force more people to 'member-only' or subscription sites, for a short time, is all.

    Meanwhile, isohunt (among others) is going strong.

    Finally, could also push more people into IRC, which I'm sure the MAAFIA would just adore.

    1. Re:The market will find a way by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      Thats an index >.

      The problem is that so many torrents rely on piratebay as a tracker.

      Piratebay tracks a large portion of torrents and just like when the mininova index went down, all other trackers and possibly even indexes will collapse under pressure.

    2. Re:The market will find a way by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats an index >.

      Aware of that - but check out the trackers on isohunt; plenty of options other than Piratebay. If it goes down, people will use the alternatives, simple as that.

      How long did it take to recover from mininova? Not long...

    3. Re:The market will find a way by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 1

      Indeed. isoHunt(and many other p2p search engines) cross reference via the infohash, and add the other trackers that it finds that infohash on to the torrent file. Redundancy is nice.

      - Shadow

      --
      www.isoHunt.com
    4. Re:The market will find a way by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      Maybe the bittorrent protocol could use some robustification.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    5. Re:The market will find a way by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nothing wrong with the protocol. That's like saying there was something 'wrong' with IP if all the DNS servers were nuked...

    6. Re:The market will find a way by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>>How long did it take to recover from mininova? Not long...

      Or Demonoid? Or niteshdw.com? When those went down, my torrent program immediately switched to dht: and was able to build a database of ~500,000 users. I continued downloading and seeding demonoid/niteshdw torrents for MONTHS.

      There were only two demonoid torrents which failed to complete with dht:, so I used isohunt to find a backup tracker, and switched to that. The second torrent had no backup tracker, so I uploaded the file to torrentstorm and within days it was alive again.

      Eventually I was able to complete downloading everything, despite RIAA's shutting down the trackers.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:The market will find a way by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is already support for using multiple trackers for a single torrent. The issue is that the rest of the bittorrent ecosystem may not be able to cope with the load that pirate bay is currently supporting.

      I guess it is an open question as to whether the resources devoted to bittorrent could support more traffic, but saying 'it should be better' isn't really a good way to demonstrate that it can be better.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:The market will find a way by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >>>Is a 486 processor with 12 megabyte enough speed/room to run a Linux OS?

      Yes using Darn Small Linux, but it will be virtually unusable since 12 meg isn't enough room to run FireFox or OpenOffice. Don't waste your money buying any machine with less than 100 meg of RAM.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:The market will find a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on a second..

    10. Re:The market will find a way by uncle+slacky · · Score: 1

      Firefox? Why not use Arachne - it only needs svgalib:
      http://www.glennmcc.org/aralinux/arachne-svgalib-1.93.tgz

      As for word processing - shurely LaTeX is all you need?

      --
      Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
    11. Re:The market will find a way by cjb658 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally, a simple, permanent solution to the piracy problem.

      Nothing to see here, move along...

    12. Re:The market will find a way by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Not only does dht routinely show over 1,000,000 these days (~936,000 at the moment), but the majority of peers I see connected are found from PeerExchange. So as long as DHT can find a few and PeerExchange can pick up the rest, I don't see the loss of Pirate Bay doing anything but maybe slowing down downloads a little bit.

  4. Tag this FUD by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The internet is resilient, and someone somewhere will pick up the slack that could be left by TPB going down. There's enough trackers out there to lend a hand.

    Solution? Support The Pirate Bay. Don't download? Support them anyway for the things they do to battle the MAFIAA and other evils.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    1. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Who cares about torrents anyways ... Real men use USENET ...

    2. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the first rule.... :)

    3. Re:Tag this FUD by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 4, Informative

      you just violated the most important rule of usenet -_-

      Rule 1 of usenet: Don't ever talk about usenet.

    4. Re:Tag this FUD by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      The internet is resilient, and someone somewhere will pick up the slack that could be left by TPB going down.

      Exactly. BT filled in the void left after suprnova.org shut down.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    5. Re:Tag this FUD by Kjella · · Score: 1

      i think only the US buys that crap that it's impossible to build out any decent broadband, backbone and servers to handle it. We can, we have and there's nothing stopping us. Give it a few decades and 100Mbit+ connections will be commonplace.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Tag this FUD by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      s/BT/The Pirate Bay

    7. Re:Tag this FUD by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Someone broke the rule a while ago. That's why all the major ISPs stopped carrying the good groups.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    8. Re:Tag this FUD by jitterman · · Score: 1

      I would mod you up for both funny and "FOLLOW THIS ADVICE AT ALL TIMES" if I only had the points.

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    9. Re:Tag this FUD by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      And you perpetuated the violation!

      Call it tenesu or something. However, I think tenesu is a different mindset/paradigm. Want something, better get it fast or it will be gone in a month or so. But I've picked up things from torrents years after they came out.

    10. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because all that traffic is now being divert onto the Internet at large via commercial usenet services and bittorrent. Having it local to the ISP means their network usage stays local to their own infrastructure.

    11. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In korea, they are already.

    12. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Pirate Bay - Too big to fail, government bailout proposed!

    13. Re:Tag this FUD by minijedimaster · · Score: 0

      A few decades? 50Mb is coming out now, don't think it will be a few decades before 100Mb will be out and common place. http://techreport.com/discussions.x/14481 Of course, if Bittorrent crashes who needs a 50Mb line anyway? ;)

    14. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory. In practice, not enough people used it to make it worthwhile.

    15. Re:Tag this FUD by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 0

      Who are these researchers? How long have they been on the intertubes? Do they really think the lack of this relatively small stack of blades they call TPB will bring down a massive world-wide network like bT?

      It seems to me this is FUD, but the purpose of publishing it is not immediately clear to me.

    16. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men use FTP. USENET is for people that are out of the scene and just want to bite on sceners hard work.

    17. Re:Tag this FUD by DetpackJump · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I miss the good old days of alt.binaries.south-asian-amputees-pooping-in-grandpas-mouth

    18. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone can use FTP. Real men use Kermit.

    19. Re:Tag this FUD by hobbit · · Score: 1

      That's the second rule. No, hang on, that's a mistake. The second rule is... no smoking.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    20. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was the second rule

    21. Re:Tag this FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it. There IS NO SCENE without leechers.

    22. Re:Tag this FUD by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      It's use(net)less saying that afterwards.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  5. RIP bittorent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We hardly knew ye.

  6. Bit Torrent has recovered before by DontLickJesus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forgive the crudeness, but this is bull. Bit Torrent has survived a major tracker shutdown before (Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suprnova.org). Traffic will redirect, other trackers will open in their place, and things will return to normal within a week.

    --
    Where genius and insanity become confused true wisdom is found
    1. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, Bittorrent survived, but the trackers didn't. According to a talk at 24c3, one (public) tracker after the other collapsed due to the heavy load, after TPB shut down.

    2. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you just say "bull"? That's no kind of language for a distinguished web forum like Slashdot! You wash your mouth out with soap, young man!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    3. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by jambarama · · Score: 1

      I think the very resilience of these p2p networks to seizures (TPB in 2006), shutdowns (from grokster to suprnova), attacks of all kinds (see mediadefender) - speak to their incredible value. I'll bet bittorrent is one of the easier ways to disseminate prohibited information through the great firewall of china.

      If I was a policy maker and knew of a communications network that was this easy to setup and this hard to disrupt and shutdown, I'd want to ensure it stayed around, especially when times are less stable. I suppose the legal & technical attacks have the effect of selecting the strongest and most anonymous networks, but I they also have a tendency to filter out the most popular networks, which are often (though not always) the most efficient ones.

    4. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Informative

      Which part of "nor did it operate any BitTorrent trackers" do you not comprehend in (from your wikipedia link):

      "Suprnova did not host any of the shared files, nor did it operate any BitTorrent trackers for long. It offered the ".torrent" meta files which would tell a BitTorrent client where it could find the BitTorrent tracker."

    5. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by shish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bittorrent is hard to shut down for legal reasons; technically, blocking a given torrent isn't much harder than blocking a given website. From what I've heard, things like tor and freenet are more resilient, even after the government gives the ISPs permission to do whatever it takes to block them.

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    6. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I was a policy maker and knew of a communications network that was this easy to setup and this hard to disrupt and shutdown, I'd want to ensure it stayed around, especially when times are less stable.

      You're making the unfounded assumption that policy makers WANT communications networks that are hard easy to set up and hard to disrupt (control) or shutdown.

      They want to control what you see and hear while preserving the appearance of freedom and choice. Will it be profitable for the elite if we invade a helpless country? Our "free press" will ensure that while flipping channels you'll get both sides of the story. 1: "they are a major and immediate threat and we need to invade immediately with massive force and occupy them permanently," or 2. "they aren't quite that big of a threat, we need to invade more cautiously with a smaller force and only occupy them for a few years."

      --
      This space available.
    7. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by melikamp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Within a week? I wouldn't expect to wait that long.

      1. mininova.org
      2. torrenthound.com
      3. btmon.com
      4. monova.org
      5. torrentportal.com
      6. torrentreactor.net
      7. fulldls.com
      8. bittorrent.am
      9. extratorrent.com
    8. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by dkleinsc · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wouldn't worry about it: we've used the word "Belgium" on this distinguished web forum on many occasions.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    9. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by billcopc · · Score: 1

      What ever happened to decentralized trackers ? I remember reading something about the TPB guys working on the next big thing, shortly after the dirty cops confiscated their servers a few years back.

      I think the bittorrent system has reached a point where enough people are involved that a shared, decentralized system could be made to work reliably. Something like taking the existing setup of web forum, tracker and membership database, and prop it up on top of a P2P overlay network generously supplied by site operators. It doesn't seem like such a huge stretch, especially when you consider that file sharing will never go away. Every time the courts shut down a network, another will rise bigger and stronger than the last.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    10. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      But was the use gratuitous? It needs to be gratuitous use FTW, if I recall.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    11. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      El toro poo poo?

    12. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      So true, he shoulda added the -shit.

    13. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I beg your pardon! Would not the name of a super-analytical engine be quite appropriate here?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    14. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      10. Google
      11. Yahoo!
      12. Micr.... never mind that one.

    15. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bitsoup and demonoid are my favorite members-only sites

    16. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgot torrentspy.com

    17. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Most of those aren't trackers. They are torrent indexes.

    18. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by DontLickJesus · · Score: 1

      The unfortunate side affect off decentralization is degradation of initial ramp up time for downloads. While the "hunt for a participating IP" system does work, it has historically been a last-ditch approach for networks which were slowly dieing. This is in no way meant to insult BT's trackerless system. It works beautifully. However, in the end it really exists as a support to the swarms, not as the backbone.

      --
      Where genius and insanity become confused true wisdom is found
    19. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by w0lo · · Score: 1

      mininova is not a tracker, search only, don't know about the others

    20. Re:Bit Torrent has recovered before by alexo · · Score: 1

      How does one become a member?

  7. Re:UI Design Fail. by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

    Argh. WTF. UI Design Fail.

    Disable the beta index. It's beta for a reason.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  8. Re:UI Design Fail. by steinnes · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem, until I logged in. Anyway I think it's an epic UI fail, because since when is it a good idea to alienate new users with this kind of crap?

  9. Re:Is it me. by VShael · · Score: 0

    No, it's not just you.

  10. BitTorrent collapse? by GerardAtJob · · Score: 1

    If one close, ten will open...

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
  11. Probably won't happen.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As I recall, one of the guys running the site said they had made arrangements such that the actual hardware is no longer under their direct control, so even if they are all found guilty, it would be outside their ability to shut it down, even if ordered to do so by a court.

    1. Re:Probably won't happen.... by Computershack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so even if they are all found guilty, it would be outside their ability to shut it down, even if ordered to do so by a court.

      You can damned well guarantee that a jail term for failure to comply will suddenly make it possible. I doubt there's many torrent tracker site owners and admins willing to serve jailtime for it.

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    2. Re:Probably won't happen.... by shish · · Score: 1

      You can damned well guarantee that a jail term for failure to comply will suddenly make it possible. I doubt there's many torrent tracker site owners and admins willing to serve jailtime for it.

      If they do have some control, then they can use it and avoid jail; if they truly don't, is "failing to shut down a server you don't own" a crime? Your scenario only makes sense if it can be proved that they have control, and even after proof being found, they refuse to do it~

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    3. Re:Probably won't happen.... by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/sweden/1476548/Swedens-jail-reforms-are-put-on-hold.html

      Quote: Almost as soon as he was caught, Saddam Hussein, the former Iraqi president, asked to be allowed to serve out his time awaiting trial in a Swedish jail. "Prisons in Sweden seem to be more comfortable than in other places,"

      --
  12. Re:Is it me. by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1, Informative

    My front page just switched over to only displaying headlines and hour ago, I have to click through to each article now to get the summary!

  13. Huh? by Who+Is+The+Drizzle · · Score: 1

    Didn't they already mention before that if something like this happened that they'd just move to somewhere like Antigua and just reopen again?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They already have servers in other countries. The swedish servers was "stolen" by the police in the raid.

    2. Re:Huh? by Zsub · · Score: 1

      No, that's a great idea really.

      Where the hell does Antigua get it's tubes anyway? Because they are going to need hell of a lot bigger ones if TBP is moving there...

  14. Mixed Feelings by hags2k · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I can't help but have mixed feelings about that. While I don't condone copyright violations or ever recommend the service to others, the pirate bay has been very influential in terms of stirring up some major debates about digital content, which I think is a good thing.

  15. So What? by gbutler69 · · Score: 0

    And this is a problem because?

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:So What? by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is extremely annoying because I can't read articles at-a-glance anymore. I only click on articles for the comments and I only read comments and write comments if I'm heavily interested in this story.

    2. Re:So What? by beelsebob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Learn to use RSS already.

    3. Re:So What? by Xtense · · Score: 0

      RSS? We don't need no steenking RSS!

      Yeah yeah, get off my lawn, insensitive clod, etc. etc. etc.

      --
      "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
  16. This is GREAT for bittorrent by flagg9483 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With Pirate Bay shut down that means that uploaders will move on to better trackers - PRIAVTE trackers - which have higher quality control, fewer trojans, and ratio requirements.

    1. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ratio requirements which rely on the client reporting accurate up/download amounts to the tracker, great idea...

    2. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      I thought that those numbers were verified by the people you sent data to. You, x would tell the tracker I sent X MB to y peer. Tracker would ask y peer did you receive X MB from x peer?

      If this isn't how it works then why doesn't it work this way?

    3. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem with ratio requirement sites is if you download content "later" (e.g. not in the first day of release), it is sometimes impossible to keep a good ratio no matter how much you try to seed since no one is downloading.

      As an example, at one ratio site they had 8 torrents that I was able to get from other sources and one that I wanted. Even after 2-3 days of seeding those 8 torrents, I didn't have enough credits to fully download a single torrent without going negative. Yes, I left it seeding constantly, but most of the time it was all seeders and no leechers.

      To be honest, I've never had speed problems for most content from non-ratio-enforcing sites. I've found ratio-enforcing sites to be a major hassle. YES my ratio is well above 1:1 for public content as I don't believe in leeching, but it's actually really difficult to maintain one's ratio on a ratio-enforcing site because you frequently run into a "lots of seeders and no leechers" scenario.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only people who use this excuse are a) people who use crap clients like bitcomet/bitlord that dont report properly to the tracker or are poorly implemented, b) leeches that don't share and don't like rules, or c) people banned from private trackers.

    5. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Because that just shifts the problem to a second client... You can run a second one yourself and report fake upload amounts. Or even run it on the same network and report -real- upload amounts between each client.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    6. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by bluesatin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I got invited to a private tracker the other day that expected everyone to keep a ratio of over 1:1.

      It's nice to know some sites are so far up their own arse that they forget quite how bit-torrent works and fail at basic maths.

    7. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      I experimented with this for a while. Now my ratio on Emporni...er, "Demonoid" is somewhere around 23,000. Of course I don't use it on any private tracker that I actually care about, but it was interesting to see this little weakness in action

      --
      Your ad here.
    8. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      The absolute best way to get your ratio up is to release your own torrents, and do it often. I've managed to rescue my ratio more than once this way, and usually in 24 hours or less.

      --
      Your ad here.
    9. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One way I do it is to download a popular torrent and seed that, even if I don't care what it is. Leave that up over night and my ratio comes back towards 1:1.

    10. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by SebaSOFT · · Score: 1

      There is a solution for that on some private trackers, called "Seed Points"

    11. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      I've encountered this as well. I more or less worked around it by seeding other more popular torrents from the same site to ratios of say 3 or 4 to make up for it...but I do remember at first leaving many of them in my list for weeks only to pick up maybe 10%.

    12. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      Yep, we had that problems for ever at big E. I used to patrol the ratio reports manually every night (back when we had a mere 10,000 or so active users) and watch for massive ratio spikes. I got most of them with the banhammer, but it was labor intensive. I am certain I could have scripted it, or Saz could have done it as well, but I actually enjoyed dropping the hammer of justice on leechers. /Vamp on Big E

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    13. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by mrclisdue · · Score: 1

      I have an account at a private, non-ratio enforcing site, and even though I always seed to %200, it currently has my ratio at .33, with 7.28TB downloaded (impossible), and 2.43TB uploaded (possible, though probably a bit high)

      If this were a ratio-enforcing site, I would have to send myself an invite and establish a new account. My point being that they don't always get it right, and if they don't, who are you going to complain to.

      anyhoo,

    14. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only a problem with Demonoid. Real private torrent sites don't have it, Users would run amok if they did.

    15. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Zerth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, they just figure if you aren't cheating, you aren't trying.

    16. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Have no problem keeping a good ratio. My 1930 copy of Monte Cristo was uploading at almost 20k/sec just last night.

      No idea why it is so popular. But 700mb has generated 7gb of ratio.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    17. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're describing depends entirely on how anal they are on the ratio. I'm a member of a private torrent site too, but it has a .45 minimum + half credits on some things + free leech on others + bonus points for seeding old torrents + the occasional free site-wide leech. That's enough for there to be plenty good seeds on most things, while still not being anything for the leeches that just download and leave.

    18. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The great thing about the bt protocol is that you really don't need to enforce seeding. If the download is going slow, people will let it run for a long time. Once it completes they won't notice and start to seed. If the downloads are really fast then they'll probably not seed since they are present to cancel it. Either way more people downloading means more people uploading.

    19. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by harl · · Score: 1

      I've found it to be highly dependent on the file. You can't grab any file and expect it to work. It has to be a popular file and I find that large files help. If the file is to small the file can be completed before the client ever asks you.

      Newness has nothing to do with the file. I'm still seeding a file I downloaded over a year ago. It's 26 GB and there are always 2-6 people downloading it.

      Also remember uploads while you yet to have a complete file also count toward ratio even though I've had some bt clients that didn't track that.

      Regardless this problem is a boon for private trackers not a bane. If a user can't get to .3-.4 out of the gate then you likely don't want them in the community. Once you have a decent ratio it keeps people on the tracker because it becomes very hard to fall back down. Thus they stay and are active in swarms. Remember bt is like the economy. If you're not moving all the bits around it falls apart.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    20. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that forced seeding does is create an archive situation. Where files that are no longer in demand are still around in case the need arises. The protocol wasn't really designed for this.

    21. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had no problems finding relatively old content on public trackers, long after most people stop seeding them on private trackers because they're no longer able to get any credit for them.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    22. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      That actually sounds like a nice setup.

      I do remember that an old version of tvtorrents.com gave something like 1.5x credit for seeding a completed file - That version worked well.

      It went down for a year or two and when it came back, it had a strict 1:1 ratio enforcement and it was next to impossible to establish credits. Also I frequently would not receive credit for seeding.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    23. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      but most of the time it was all seeders and no leechers.

      Wow, life's a bitch.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    24. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by sega01 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Troll, -1.

    25. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Inda · · Score: 1

      All my fellow children on this post are describing themselves as old school leechers. Leechers - taking something and not giving back. Not, I'm downloading something therefore I'm a leecher and I wear it as a badge of honour.

      How about, to improve your ratio, you add something original? You be the first to upload it? Get the files from IRC, FTP, Usenet and then seed them from the start?

      What, you don't know how? Damn, fuckin', leechers. Buy a DVD a rip it you cheap pikeys. I like football and Jungle by the way, start with a DVD about that.

      In fact don't bother. BT is too risky.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    26. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is also compounded by people who deliberately seed to better than 1:1, because they're preventing other people from uploading their share!

      Remember, across the whole torrent, the average must be a share ratio of 1:1

    27. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone suggested in a blog post that it'd be nice if trackers awarded extra upload credit for less popular torrents, especially ones with few seeders and not many leechers. Of course, you'd have to make sure it's actually content that at least some people want, as opposed to just garbage.

    28. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by maxume · · Score: 1

      You just need to find a buddy and give each other tug jobs (i.e., seed torrents back and forth).

      Any traffic from other clients will drive you over 1.

      Basically, if you seed stuff that you didn't first download, you will win, and the more attractive the content the better.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    29. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't be able to catch them if people were more modest with their fake upload stats, though. Just like if you change an "F" to an "A" on a school report card your parents probably wouldn't believe you, but if you change it to a "C-" it's at least plausible.

      Of course, most criminals are pretty negligent and/or brazen, and it looks like most invite-only communities haven't suffered many problems with phony stats reporting.

    30. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you not downloading it reduces the amount that other people can upload.

      Making it even more difficult for people to get up to the 1:1 ratio.

    31. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, F that.

      I just USE the NET to get what I need.

    32. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yes - if anybody remembers OiNK's Pink Palace, that site actually had a requirement that users maintain a ratio of at least 1.05 in order to not be deleted. You were allowed to drop below that occasionally, but you were also expected to get it back up quickly.

      I didn't exactly cry a lot when OiNK's was busted.

    33. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by icejai · · Score: 1

      I would think this problem would be solved if the required ratio were set to equal the growth rate of new users.

      Really, the economics of seeding ratios parallels those of interest rates and money supply.

    34. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by skeeto · · Score: 1

      You just need to find a buddy and give each other tug jobs

      We're still talking about BitTorrent, right?

    35. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by tirefire · · Score: 1

      "With Pirate Bay shut down that means that uploaders will move on to better trackers - PRIAVTE trackers - which have higher quality control, fewer trojans, and ratio requirements."

      Private trackers do have those assets, but on the whole I think they're inferior. Torrents work better as more users are on them. Requiring somebody to complete a membership just to download that season of Futurama will keep a lot of people out of the "gated community" that is a private tracker. That makes for lower bandwidth and all-around inferior service.

      You can get around quality-control and trojan problems by ensuring that as many people are using the same .torrent as possible. This way, the same .torrent can get loads of comments on sites like isohunt and btjunkie. People on there do virus-scans and +rep a clean .torrent. Similarly, if a .torrent is infected, people will flood the comments section with negative comments.

      As for the ratio requirements, those are unnecessary on popular .torrents (.torrents which would be more popular if people on private trackers would join...). Seriously, every time I download a .torrent of Top Gear I have the whole 700 MB .avi downloaded before I can upload so much as 2 MB. And I have 7mb downstream / 1mb upstream DSL. My upstream bandwidth is just not being used. Conclusion: there are ample seeds already, my upload bandwidth is not needed.

    36. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit. the requirement was something like 0.5

      it varied depending how much you downloaded e.g. below 25 GB down you only needed 0.45 (or whatever it was) and above that it might be 0.75.

      and for a long time OiNK's didn't have official ratio requirements at all. when the ratio requirements were made public, loads of users complained that they were too lenient and OiNK responded by telling them that the formal ratio requirements were actually higher than the unknown, informal ones. turns out loads of people just assumed the requirement was 1.0 when it had always been much much lower

    37. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually they occasionally offer periods where your download doesn't count so people download a couple hundred GB each over that weekend, which boosts everyone's upload amount.

    38. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by BlaKmaJiK_ · · Score: 1

      I used a ratio site for a while, and I found the easiest way to get some positive credits was to pick a brand new torrent, and congifure bt to only download one file from it (say about 10% of the total size). It was like a partial-seed, without nearly as much initial download for a file I didn't want anyway :)

    39. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not sure if you wanted a real response to this, but many trackers will give you 'seed credits' just for being on a tracker - even if no one is dl'ing. It's like this on a specific gaming site that i frequent, because lets face it - although i'm sitting on both the metroid prime GCN trackers, no one's going to DL it anytime soon - yet i still get credit for it. (its basically a way to even out the whole 'lots of seeders/no leechers' thing, or the scenario where no one wants to seed old crap because its not worth it)

    40. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about gaming it. Download two albums, and then repackage them together and seed that. The entirety of that upload is ratio positive, and you have to seed 100% of it (and probably more).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    41. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Except that one of private trackers i am a member of reserves the right to upload new torrents only for "uploader" class. To become an uploader you have to have at least 10mbps upload speed which I don't have (768kbps). Now, if I had those 10mbps I could keep good ratio even without putting up new torrents (though I record some TV shows and could rip and share them). Thankfully, the tracker has a site-wide freeleech sometimes, so I just queue up torrents that I want to download and wait for that time (my download speed, btw, is 4mbps)

    42. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ratio enters the system from at least one and usually two sources:

      (1) People that join, download, and get kicked off again. (The remaining people now have >1 ratio)
      (2) People donating and thereby getting ratio credits from the site.

      So, it is possible for everybody that is active to have >1 ratio; and it is normal for everybody that is active to have >1 average ratio.

    43. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >PRIAVTE trackers

      Are those in Soviet Russia?

    44. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      I thought you were describing something along the lines of:
        - Your friend downloads album X
        - He gives you album X
        - You seed album X

      Which would reduce the upload from someone else.

      But as you described, this wasn't what you were planning. But the way you've described it, surely it would be easier to just seed the original albums?

      I guess if you're the only seeder, you'll at least get a whole upload to someone else guaranteed, while you wouldn't with the originals.

    45. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Without free-leech it is not possible for all users to have a ratio of over 1:1.

      If someone uploaded some amount of data, it means that someone else had to download it, so it is not possible for everybody to download less than they upload. It is possible, in theory, for everybody to have 1:1 ratio, but is requires that nobody tries to get a higher ratio.

    46. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely they count the ratio slightly unorthodoxically, like by giving various bonuses or treating seeding specially.

      Not that I wouldn't still view 1:1 requirement ridiculous though. That head-in-the-ass thing has been integral to the warez-scene since forever and that's definitely part of it, bonuses or not. 1337 traders need lamers and leeches to point at and if the system was fair, chanches are there wouldn't be any.

    47. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out there are better ways to go than a pure ratio requirement if you're trying to promote seeding. The problem with ratio alone is that it is a zero sum game - for every person uploading there is somebody downloading. The average ratio of every person on a private network is exactly 1:1 100% of the time.

      The way such a network should be run is:

      1. New users get some kind of grace period to get started. Maybe throttle their connections at first so everybody doesn't go creating new accounts all the time, but give them a chance to get established.

      2. Go ahead and have a strict ratio requirement, but make it 0.5:1 or 0.8:1 or something like that.

      3. Give all kinds of points for seeding torrents - particularly rare ones. You get points for time advertising a torrent even if not a single byte is transferred (provided that it has been downloaded at least so often - no seeding /dev/urandom). Go ahead and randomly spot check advertised torrents to make sure they're really being seeded.

      4. Give points for uploading new torrents that become popular.

      5. Give points for running mirrors/etc.

      6. Above all - remember the goal is to run a healthy network, not to have some elitist organization where the folks with the biggest pipes constantly make life hard for folks who have asymmetric DSL. As long as the network is healthy don't fight over whether 80% of the users are over 1:1 instead of 81%. Sure, you need to keep out leaches, but that can be done effectively without silly rules.

    48. Re:This is GREAT for bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want each user to add new content, then the math would work.

      It's a PITA and a hassle to deal with ratio enforcing sites though. But still some sort of forced sharing is good for everyone.

  17. Re:Is it me. by Hatta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes. They need to fucking cut this shit out. Seriously.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  18. sssssh! by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whenever Pirate Bay goes down, let's everyone agree that bittorrent is dead. Say it very loudly when around RIAA types and look morose, say it looks like we're going to have to pay top dollar for entertainment, pantomime getting out your wallets. And for xod's sake, don't mention any of the other torrent sites. *wink*

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:sssssh! by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      WHAT other torrent sites? Sheesh you make it sound like there ARE other torrent sites. Didn't you read the summary? The Pirate Bay goes down, and bit torrent goes down. There ARE no "other" sites.

      Did I sound convincing?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:sssssh! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Other sites? Oh! Would that there were other sites. Alas! Pirate bay is the only torrent tracker on the planet. Woe to me! What is left for this weary bag of bones, but to wait patiently for the DVD to be released, and to hope that my feeble eyes may yet be bright enough to see the screen when it is released?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:sssssh! by Tuoqui · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did I sound convincing?

      No but the public has been desensitized enough by bad acting they're used to seeing in MPAA movies that they'll believe it.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    4. Re:sssssh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think this shows exactly how good bittorent is. Organising 30% of worldwide data communications, using all of 8 servers. That would even make Google jealous.

    5. Re:sssssh! by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did I sound convincing?

      No but the public has been desensitized enough by bad acting they're used to seeing in MPAA movies that they'll believe it.

      Whoa!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:sssssh! by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I say this is the dawning of the age of open source entertainment. Who wants to collab on a wiki tv script? Anyone interested in trying out open source acting/scenes?

    7. Re:sssssh! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Won't work. They have years of first-hand experience with lying. :P

    8. Re:sssssh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Keanu join Slashdot?

  19. If they kill piratebay by javilon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the best option is a web of trust plus p2p application. This p2p would be used only to distribute tracker locations and or edonkey links, not the actual content. This way you would need no centralized web servers. Webservers are too easy a target for the MAFIAA.

    With this an something like the kad protocol we would have truly distributed content distribution. Not only the files, but the urls for the files.

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    1. Re:If they kill piratebay by Moebius+Loop · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, another 2-3 torrent sites will appear to fill the void within 7-10 days, and the circle of life continues.

      The problem with the oft-proposed solutions of distributed trackers or trust-based sharing is that in addition to making it more difficult for the media empires, it does the same for regular people.

      The *AA are gaining assets and funding all the time, and any attempt to make it more difficult for them to infiltrate a segment of the sharing community is far more likely to present a problem for "honest" users than for the gestapo.

      The current response to these shutdowns is bothersome for a few days, but it closely mirrors the response of the Internet at large when resources are preempted.

      --
      have you been seen on slash?
    2. Re:If they kill piratebay by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      I thought of something like this when I first saw the story. Trouble is, if you decentralize the trackers you need a metatracker to track them. Etc.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    3. Re:If they kill piratebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you don't. DHT already exists for BitTorrent, but it only removes the need for trackers, not the need for torrent web sites. The Kad network allows searching for ed2k links without any central server. I thought I remembered reading about some group working on something similar for BT.

    4. Re:If they kill piratebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best would be running bittorrent on top of an anonymous network like I2P. A web of trust can be compromised.

  20. Re:Is it me. by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

    Yeah no kidding. I noticed a week ago that it now requires me to login in order to view the "Moderation Comment Log".

    --
    This space is not for rent.
  21. The laws of Sweden still apply to some extent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if we are in the process of removing our rights according to the EU directives. Our constitution the "grundlag" is just a piece of paper with serious-sounding words on it, much less important than, say, an EU-directive.

    But the law still applies for a few more year, probably. Pirate Bay can't be put down by the government yet.

    If the above sounds at all critical of my government, in my defense I would like to point out that:

    1. I am wardriving this through a poorly encrypted WiFi connection that some guy or girl put up in their apartment.

    2. Hails to the Great Leader GÃran Persson and the Dear Leader Fredrik Reinfeldt, and our saviors from all that is evil: Justice Minister BostrÃm the Wise and justice minister Ask the talented, who so eminently carries out her work with exceptional quality, considering she's never put her nose in law school. She is truly a genius.

    3. This was written back in 2009 and I have since withdrawn all of my criticism of the Swedish Government.

    1. Re:The laws of Sweden still apply to some extent by Computershack · · Score: 5, Funny

      in my defense I would like to point out that:

      1. I am wardriving this through a poorly encrypted WiFi connection that some guy or girl put up in their apartment.

      I wonder if it's like my open wifi connection. I'm quite happy for people to come onto mine so I can have a damned good look through their computers. Depending on how bad I'm feeling, they might go away with an unexpected present...

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    2. Re:The laws of Sweden still apply to some extent by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Anything you can do to secure the nodes on your LAN, an attacker can do better. I doubt you're running all (any?) of your PCs from a LiveCD, with 0 personal data on them. I doubt (though it might be possible) that you're running any sort of IDS, constantly looking for (and paying attention to any alerts regarding) ARP poisioning, or brute forcing, or the status any of the potentially vulnerable ports which are fully accessible inside your "trusted zone". Maybe you are doing all of the above, but probably not unless you're getting paid to do it, and have friends/family members working shifts around the clock.

      Leaving your WAP open is just a bad idea, and relying on the belief that the person using your network is not as smart as you is setting yourself up for failure.

    3. Re:The laws of Sweden still apply to some extent by Zan+Lynx · · Score: 1

      If the WAP is on the outside of the firewall, on a DMZ or between a firewall sandwich, having an open WAP is just as secure as being on the Internet at all.

    4. Re:The laws of Sweden still apply to some extent by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you don't believe that. If he's using it for his own traffic at all, then it's vulnerable to sniffing, mitm attacks, AP spoofing, reconfiguration, etc.

      If he's not using it for his own traffic, then it's just a honeypot, and not "his wireless network" by any commonly understood meaning of the phrase.

    5. Re:The laws of Sweden still apply to some extent by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Probably not. Where I live, there are almost 50 networks, about 10 of them have no protection and 20 have WEP. One of ISPs gave a WIFi router with their subscription. The WiFi was on by default and had no protection. I only see one of this type of network. From the configuration of his router (which also isn't password protected not that it would take a lot of time to find a default password) it looks like the person doesn't even use the WiFi connection...

    6. Re:The laws of Sweden still apply to some extent by Zan+Lynx · · Score: 1

      Anyone at his ISP, anyone with physical access to the telecom CO or anyone at his ISP's ISP has exactly the same ability to do MITM and sniffing.

      I knew an admin who worked for a tier 1 network provider years ago who liked to play games with people on IRC. First he'd reconfigure a core route to broadcast a higher priority for routing their netblock through his ISP. Then all their IP traffic was at his mercy.

      This kind of thing is trivial.

      So yes, your network security is no better than anyone who has a WAP attached to their outgoing network connection. Assuming otherwise is stupid.

  22. Re:UI Design Fail. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am logged in, I still see that firehose crap. They're not just alienating new users, I'm getting sick of this crap too. I don't even let slashdot.org run scripts anymore. It stalls firefox, and doesn't provide any desirable functionality. Once upon a time Slashdot had the best forum software around. Now, it's the worst.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  23. Great article! by Bieeanda · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will seed to 1:1

    1. Re:Great article! by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      leech

    2. Re:Great article! by minijedimaster · · Score: 0

      You mean like the fucktards that can't even sign up for an account and have post their troll like whining as an anonymous coward? Yea, I'm with ya on that.

  24. Re:UI Design Fail. by Noryungi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Disable the beta index. It's beta for a reason.

    How do you do this? I tried www.slashdot.org/index.pl but it just switches me back to "index2.pl".

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  25. Not in sweden. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The servers is not in sweden, so it's impossible for swedish police to shut them down, and 'the pirates' has no reason to do it themself.(Impossible to prove that they are still running it.)

    1. Re:Not in sweden. by Computershack · · Score: 1

      The servers is not in sweden, so it's impossible for swedish police to shut them down, and 'the pirates' has no reason to do it themself.(Impossible to prove that they are still running it.)

      However the Swedes can put them in prison for aiding and facilitating. They've not done themselves any favours in respect to an "I'm innocent, I don't know what content is on there" with their replies to takedown letters. You can be damned sure that the prospect of doing additional 1-2 years jail time for not complying with a court order to shut them down will see a new found ability to do that. Would you be prepared to spend 12-24 months in prison on top of what you'd already been given just to keep a website going? I know for a fact, I wouldn't.
      What you're missing is that the court doesn't have to prove they are still running it. The fact the site is up will be sufficient to prove breach of a judgement.

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    2. Re:Not in sweden. by Bashae · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Flagfox says the IPs are swedish.

      They did have backups in other countries the last time they were shut down though.

    3. Re:Not in sweden. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The court have to prove they are still running it, and they need to do it in another trail. To get another trail the police would need to get evidence that it is the same people running it. "innocent until proven guilty"

    4. Re:Not in sweden. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can be damned sure that the prospect of doing additional 1-2 years jail time for not complying with a court order ... prepared to spend 12-24 months in prison

      Sir, the Swedish legal system does not believe in jail time. To get 24 months of jail time, you would have to kill someone. In cold blood. With an axe. And then set fire to them. And eat the remains. Even then, you're more likely to get an excuse from the judge than jail time. It is very very hard to get jailed in Sweden.

      The folks at Piratebay will be convicted and they will face "dagsboter" (fines) of several million, I guess. But I don't think they will be serving a single day in prison.

  26. Re:UI Design Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the cool tech sites are jumping the shark these days, it's the new awesome tech thing to do.

    See also: ars technica.

  27. Re:UI Design Fail. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Argh. WTF. UI Design Fail.

    Craniorectals at work.

    Before long, the site will become so laden down with useless cruft, it will slashdot itself. Someone needs to go back to basics and look at what's actually needed. The balance was pretty good a year or two ago - I think people have got carried away.

    We've had a CAMRA (Campaign for Real Ale) - now I'm ready for a campaign for real HTML.

  28. Not difficult to see the bias here... by flagg9483 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Tribler designs P2P client that pushes decentralized tracking. 2. Tribler publishes research which predicts doom and gloom for the future of centralized bittorrent trackers. 3. ??? 4. Profit!

    1. Re:Not difficult to see the bias here... by macraig · · Score: 3

      He's right, of course. The bias here is ridiculously obvious.

  29. Re:UI Design Fail. by Lucid+3ntr0py · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has a pro-windows philosophy after all! Fair and balanced coverage ftw.

  30. Well one thing is for sure by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there is truth to this, then the IP trade groups will go after TPB harder and faster now.

  31. Re:UI Design Fail. by Xylaan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Go to your user preferences, index/general. There is a check box at the top that says 'Use Beta Index Date/Time' (which is where they mashed two lines together.

    Uncheck the box, and you can return to non-beta bliss!

  32. Re:Is it me. by Bashae · · Score: 3, Informative

    Go to Preferences > Index and disable Beta Index (should be the first checkbox). I've had mine disabled for a long time and I never see any significant changes to the UI I know and love.

    Idle is still green though :P

  33. Re:UI Design Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's it.
    You are required to be authenticated.
    So much for anonymous readers.

    And this is a site where people are arguing about privacy?
    Is privacy in danger when gov is in the game or when privates are also in the game.

    Do I trust more /. or the gov?

    And what if I don't trust them both?

  34. If they switch to Ninnle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not only will the network stay up, performance will be improved. They need to at least evaluate the new NinnleBSD server package.

  35. It doesn't matter. by ledow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shut it down. It won't make any difference.

    It will force coders to create a better system.
    It will promote the use of another protocol/network that is immune to particular traits of law/jurisdiction that The Pirate Bay may fall foul of.
    In the meantime, hundreds of pretenders will show up to take the flak and the sheer volume means that all that can be done is trying to shut them down one at a time with legal threats.

    Just look at the history of ANY P2P system and it's pretty much identical.

    Give it a few more years, the Internet will be nothing but the basis of a global, anonymous, reliable, authenticatable P2P system that everybody uses to do everything. We have the technology (Tor, CloudVPN, Bittorrent, DHT, etc.), it's just a matter of fine-tuning and prevelance. As an additional bonus, it then won't matter that some people are using IPv6 and some IPv4 - everything will be in this cloud of dark smoke that you can only see what enters and leaves and nothing inbetween. You'll be able to tell that User X shared an MP3 if you are able to see all of User X's traffic. You'll be able to see that User Y downloaded an MP3 if you are able to see all of User Y's traffic. But even compromising User X completely won't reveal to you who User Y is or was. Trying to masquerade as User X without their private key would be useless, so the best you could do (even with the key) would be to propogate false content to... who? Nobody would know - everything is just an anonymous connection from a dozen random peers.

    The media companies and governments are, by a process of digital evolution, driving anonymous communications into necessities and they become more prevelant with each generation. Hardly anybody warezed back in the 90's as a percentage of Internet users - now most ordinary people know how to find and download illegal content in a few clicks. Each time the problem of "piracy" is "fixed", it crops up yet again, somewhere else, in a new form that's more convenient, faster, harder to prove and more ubiquitous.

    Even in terms of general users - the only things that people ever ask me about when the subject comes up are "something like Napster or something". They've never used Napster but the fame of being shut down was enough to make them into a household name for free/illegal content. Do it to The Pirate Bay (whose name I'm already getting mentioned in conversations from people who I thought couldn't work a mouse) and the same will happen.

    It doesn't mean that they *shouldn't* be shutting down The Pirate Bay, or that The Pirate Bay are somehow "right" or "heroes". They have taken advantage of an interesting legal technicality. It just means that you're not going to win with the sorts of tactics where you just try and shut the sites down. Maybe the opportunity for the media companies EVER winning has now passed and they'll never be able to anymore - who knows? But they are trying to catch fog in a net... this isn't a problem they can solve by shutting down a server - they need something else. I don't know what. They certainly don't. But until it exists, they are playing a losing game.

    1. Re:It doesn't matter. by geckipede · · Score: 1

      If you've got something truly decentralised, ie - no defined server to allow anybody to find one another, it would surely be necessary for it to evolve from a previous p2p standard. You need enough clients running right from the start to allow for any one client to be able to connect to some others just by looking around for peers in random locations. You could partly do it the darknet way, connecting only to people you know, but that would end up very fragmented.

    2. Re:It doesn't matter. by melikamp · · Score: 1

      If what you say comes true, they will tax the internet heavily (forget that it is unfair to the highest degree, since the internet is a bundle of distilled goodness which helps everyone by making the entire mass of Human culture available to everyone, everywhere, at a nominal cost). This is when the real game will begin: hijacking internet connections and using them for free. Hey, I'll be there.

    3. Re:It doesn't matter. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      >> Maybe the opportunity for the media companies EVER winning has now passed and they'll never be able to anymore - who knows?

      What's online for free..
      TOS Star Trek
      Battle Star Galactica
      Heroes
      Lost
      Burn Notice
      Chuck

      Just off the top of my head. Pretty sure many others are these days.

      With a flash capture tool, you can keep them.

      I was very happy to find AOL offering high quality versions of all the old MTV Videos (including HOOK!!!) online. I played them all and now i have them all on my hard drives and some DVD's.

      A lot of shows are not worth buying on DVD because one viewing is your lifetime fill of them.

      I'm about ready to kill DISH network. They've gotten way to expensive (again).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:It doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is always the OFF system...
      http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/

    5. Re:It doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the opportunity for the media companies EVER winning has now passed and they'll never be able to anymore - who knows?

      I know, it happened December 7th, 1999. Instant self-defeat, the Streisand effect (same mechanic even though in this case it's about removing a capability) was enormous and tapped into a huge reservoir of built-up animosity towards the industry.

    6. Re:It doesn't matter. by cellurl · · Score: 1

      It just signals the end of DVD's.
      Seriously folks, Gameboy games dont have this problem.
      Hey Hollywood. Get rid of DVD's. Just use proprietary hardware for movies, its fair. Some will thwart it with piracy, but lets face it when movies cost $1.00 at Redbox, stealing them is not grand larceny any longer...

    7. Re:It doesn't matter. by skeeto · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about Freenet. ;-)

    8. Re:It doesn't matter. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      [...] anonymous, reliable, authenticatable [...]

      Aren't anonymous and authenticatable mutually exclusive since authentication presupposes identification?

    9. Re:It doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pessimistically predict that ISPs will be able cut off P2P at the neck. Everything evolves right up until it becomes extinct.

    10. Re:It doesn't matter. by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      The media companies and governments are, by a process of digital evolution, driving anonymous communications into necessities and they become more prevelant with each generation.

      I wish I could be as optimistic, though I do agree the need is getting greater.

      Maybe the opportunity for the media companies EVER winning has now passed and they'll never be able to anymore ... this isn't a problem they can solve by shutting down a server - they need something else. I don't know what. They certainly don't.

      Actually, they do know. And they are working toward getting it. They want the internet to work like cable TV. That is, all content is hosted on servers they either control, or, effectively, license. It's just a matter of time before all the ISPs are fully aligned with this.

      True, right now, ISPs are, more or less, required to allow P2P, but how long do you really thing it will be before they - and the media companies - persuade parliament/congress/whatever that it is better that content be hosted by "proper hosting businesses"?

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    11. Re:It doesn't matter. by ledow · · Score: 1

      This is my point. When ordinary communications are intercepted, the governments can only chase their own tails. It's like the Australian ISP filtering - it only needs one ISP not to play ball or one way around it and *everyone* will use it because they can't get the things they are getting today otherwise.

      Of course it will be fought, but it won't be long before it's impossible for the government to do / ban anything because it will be impossible to distinguish legitimate traffic from other traffic. You can't ban P2P when your own state TV and radio stations, research projects, etc. rely on being able to connect to random, anonymous peers who share traffic. iPlayer makes up 1/3rd of all UK traffic at your average ISP. Other P2P takes up the majority of the remaining traffic with email / web / other taking up the tiny bit that's left. They can't cut off P2P instantly, therefore it has the opportunity (and the motive and means) to evolve to a place where it cannot be stopped AT ALL. How long before an application comes out that provides another "killer" use of P2P to the average person - free live TV streaming of the expensive sports channels? I know people who would gladly spend thousands of hours to get that working for themselves in place of the legitimate footage on offer (come on, some of the sports channels charge £30/month to view them and then *extra* to view anything vaguely interesting).

      And, let's assume the impossible happens, and the government filters all the official channels. That's hefty control that would require world-wide co-ordination and alienate the vast majority of the population (those who weren't brought up with such restrictions). Even in China, people get onto the "real" web and bypass filters. What happens then is that official Internet transit lines become no-go areas. Wireless takes over and you'll get people building, selling, and setting up mesh networking. Even if it's just national, rather than international, there's still a massive impetus to provide communications to everybody anonymously. You'll have people stringing together their *own* Internet (that is, after all, all it is in the first place) and because the anonymous, secure, protocols run *on top* of this, you won't even notice the difference. It might be a bit slower, but then, depending on your current end-point, it might be a lot faster (e.g. 54MBps to a well-connected neighbour vs 512Kbps to an ISP at the other end of the country).

      The point is that it's the social element that will kill attempts to filter the Internet in countries that have an established history of being able to access it unfiltered. The Internet is nothing more than a collection of networks, not the "Internet" people are used to (i.e. has to connect over a well-known backend provider via a large commercial entity to another country), and as soon as people realise that even Joe down the road has something they might want, it can be a matter of hours before people are meshing their networks together with their friends, their friend's friends and so on. Even if you just use the mesh for P2P to share music and the "filtered" Internet for general stuff, it's still taken a massive hold on your life and then if someone comes up with a way to show you the unfiltered Internet for free on your P2P/mesh network, what is the first thing you will do? Abandon the "normal" Internet. (P2P melds well in concept with meshing because you don't need to know an explicit route to the endpoint, or well-defined numbering schemes, and you're prepared to pass on a lot of other people's traffic in order to get that tiny bit of vital traffic that you've been hunting for for years).

      Again, there's always a weak link in controlling such a scheme - it only needs ONE of those people to have a connection to ONE other place that connects to an unfiltered Internet to render the whole connection "open" and "uncensored". Before that, though, it's the P2P content-sharing that will make it popular - after all, this works better the more peopl

    12. Re:It doesn't matter. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Aren't anonymous and authenticatable mutually exclusive since authentication presupposes identification?

      OK, s/anonymous/pseudonymous/g. Then the problem becomes one of establishing a pseudonym that cannot be connected to a state-recognized identity.

    13. Re:It doesn't matter. by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's not impervious or perfect but it's a dozen times harder to detect, shut down, enforce, legislate against

      The FCC and foreign counterparts regulate the radio frequency emissions that Wi-Fi uses.

    14. Re:It doesn't matter. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "They want the internet to work like cable TV"

      That's easy enough.

      Just stay with IPv4 and don't move to IPv6.

      Once you run out of IPv4 addresses, put everyone behind NATs, and say bye bye to P2P.

      --
  36. I like how... by spydabyte · · Score: 1

    I like how the article says that bit-torrent will melt down if a torrent site goes down. Well duh? Wouldn't that be the goal of shutting the site down? What kind of a warning is that.

    If anything it's just research that backs the copyright holders desire to shut it down.

    1. Re:I like how... by x78 · · Score: 1

      Hmm? Bittorrent isn't local to one website, take down TPB and there are many other trackers that'll take the load.
      You can't shut down bittorrent, it's a protocol worked into various applications.
      Ever tried shutting down HTTP?

      --
      Don't panic
  37. Re:UI Design Fail. by bikehorn · · Score: 1

    That reminds me, can anyone tell me WTF the firehose is and why are we supposed to care about it?

  38. Re: missing a zero, I hope? by macraig · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're missing a zero in that ratio, I hope? That ratio is an order of magnitude off from BitTorrent sainthood.

  39. Re:Is it me. by swordgeek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thank you! /. is now usable for the first time in months!

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  40. PUBLIC trackers might suffer.. by aika · · Score: 1

    ...but private trackers will be strong as ever. We just have to move a little more underground to avoid the MAFIAA.

  41. Re:UI Design Fail. by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

    Before long, the site will become so laden down with useless cruft, it will slashdot itself.

    Slashdot has already slashdotted itself.

    --
    Your ad here.
  42. Re:UI Design Fail. by urbanriot · · Score: 1

    You are required to be authenticated. So much for anonymous readers.

    Fantastic! Now the 4chan'ers can stay in 4chan, and maybe Slashdot will regain some of its quality user base.

  43. Re:Considering.... by Dusty00 · · Score: 1

    thieving hypocrites [citation needed]

    If you agree with copyright law and think this is wrong that's fine but I'm having trouble understanding how you find them to be hypocritical. Their basic philosophy seem to be "Okay big content industry, you want to hold our culture hostage, let's see you try it!" Basically exhibiting the Ragnar Danneskjöld school of though.

  44. BitTorrent is not a Network by KeithIrwin · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no such thing as "the BitTorrent network". That's like talking about "the HTTP network". It's a distributed download protocol. It doesn't do search and different trackers and torrents are not interconnected in any way. Thus, it is not a network. The ability to use BitTorrent will not be harmed in any way by any one site going down.

    Remember when everyone used suprnova and then it went away? The world of BitTorrent will be fine.

    1. Re:BitTorrent is not a Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      HTTP is a protocal, not a network. But computers can form a network using http, its called the Internet. Bittorrent IS a network because it is computers networked together sharing information via the bittorrent protocol.

    2. Re:BitTorrent is not a Network by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Informative

      supernova wasn't a tracker, TPB is the biggest tracker. Slight difference there. If TPB goes down, alot of the trackers will have to fill in the gap and its a pretty big burden, some trackers could get crushed. I think what will happen is a index like isohunt will take control completely. Then all trackers will be small but there will be thousands of them. In this way the riaa can play whack-a-mole with the trackers as much as they want to no avail. And the index are innocent or atleast fairly easily replaceable. And we won't see a repeat.

    3. Re:BitTorrent is not a Network by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Funny

      But computers can form a network using http, its called the Internet.

      Did you really just say that?

    4. Re:BitTorrent is not a Network by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Whats suprnova? hehe

      Imagine how (much) big(ger) isohunt will get if tpb goes down (for good)...

      Sites come and go that's just the way it goes, 1 goes down 10 more pop up its an unending cycle... :D

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
  45. i hope it gets fixed soon by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    i would hate to see legal torrents disabled because of a few copywrite infringers, please think of the children ^^err The Linux ISOs...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  46. Re:UI Design Fail. by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

    Then use the RSS feed like any 'sane' person. All 'modern' browsers, and IE7, have integrated RSS feed readers, so you shouldn't complain.

  47. Re:UI Design Fail. by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

    Fantastic! Now the 4chan'ers can stay in 4chan, and maybe Slashdot will regain some of its quality user base.

    You can still post anonymously by checking the "Post Anonymously" while logged in.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  48. A FEATURE, not a bug... by nweaver · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For all those who go "But BitTorrent has noninfringing usages", having PirateBay go away will have no effect on the legitimate torrents. Its only the pirate-trackers that will melt down.

    So for those interested in legitimate P2P content delivery, this "meltdown" would be a feature, not a bug, because as long as BitTorrent is almost all piracy, it is easier to make a case for traffic management.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:A FEATURE, not a bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the same logic which allowed Firefox to ignore all the memory leaks for YEARS. This has nothing to do with private trackers - they will be completely unaffected. This affects PUBLIC trackers, but only for enough time that it takes to setup new ones. And legitimate content distribution via bittorrent is impractical. People are not going through the complicated trouble to setup a tracker and keep things seeded just to distribute a software update or pdf service manual. That cost will vastly outweigh any savings in bandwidth. Bitorrent works because of committed people who understand that they need to share to keep the torrent alive. The average person isn't going to do that when downloading something from a vendor. And that's were you will lose the efficiency that the technology is supposed to provide. Without a community of peers then legitimate distrubutors are better off saving cpu cycles and overhead bandwidth and setting up an ftp server.

    2. Re:A FEATURE, not a bug... by dfm3 · · Score: 1

      having PirateBay go away will have no effect on the legitimate torrents

      Legal torrent files are occasionally available on TPB; Linux ISOs for example. Granted, a vast majority of the content on that site is being shared against the wishes of the copyright holders.

  49. Re:Is it me. by SBrach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That'll show em.

  50. Re:UI Design Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go to 4chan for the intelligent and insightful discussion but I come to Slashdot for the moronic trolling. No, really.

  51. Re:UI Design Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but they'll still know who you are, mannnnnnnnn

  52. Re:UI Design Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fantastic! Now the 4chan'ers can stay in 4chan, and maybe Slashdot will regain some of its quality user base.

    You owe me a new keyboard. "Quality user base". You kidder.

  53. Re:UI Design Fail. by poena.dare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot has really made me learn to hate CSS. (or bad CSS programmers)

    Simple Design + Low Bandwidth + No Icons + No Boxes + Large Browser Font
    and I still
    get a narrow
    story column
    and a ton of
    wasted
    whitespace.

  54. Doubtful. by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

    Traffic will only flow to other trackers automatically if torrent files have multiple trackers listed, which isn't all too common. A vast proportion of TPB users are random college kid types with little tech knowledge, and would not know how to find alternative trackers.

    Additionally, there are dozens of small private/invite trackers which would not be affected as they have limited membership. Generally, these researchers have their heads up their asses.

    Demonoid ftw.

  55. Re:UI Design Fail. by justthinkit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And Tom's Hardware -- I can't use the CPU graphs anymore, for example.

    --
    I come here for the love
  56. Re:UI Design Fail. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's yet another concept the overlords think is cool, but no one else does (more specifically, it's a way to influence what stories get picked a la Digg). We shouldn't care about it.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  57. Re:Obama comments on Judd Gregg's withdrawl by CarpetShark · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Then why don't you just say that you're disappointed,

    Because stupid people would understand enough of it to attack him with it. In this day and age, it makes sense for politicians to encode things for people capable of rational thought.

  58. Re:Considering.... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I doubt that anyone other than the thieving hypocrites would likely notice.

    Assuming that by "thieving hypocrites", you mean anyone who wants to get free shit off bitorrent, you realise that covers most of the people here.

    And I may be a hypocrite but I'm no thief.

  59. Anybody here remember Napster? by mmell · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Which (when pinched by the US judicial system) imploded - but leaving behind the Gnutella filesharing protocol (BearShare, LimeWire, FrostWire, etc).

    Never mind that the Napster name survived and came back as another DRM'ed monstrosity. We still have the Gnutella protocol, free and unencumbered (poisoned, but we tech types can deal with that, eh?).

    If TPB goes under (like SuperNova - can you say "mininova"?), there'll be plenty of other site operators ready to take advantage of their country's laws to make money from the opportunity this would represent. Trust me - even if TPB is forced to shut down (a questionable liklihood), there'll be plenty of others coming behind to pick up the profitable pieces left behind.

    Data occupies space, has mass, exerts gravity. Even physically turning off TPB's servers won't make that data go away. Even if you nuke the servers holding the data and wipe all the hard drives, the data still exists (scattered about on the internet in some form or another). It'll be found (rediscovered) and used.

    This is just another example of the existing media cartels (MPAA, RIAA, et. al.) trying to stuff the genie back in the bottle. They obviously haven't learned from their past experience with Gnutella just how difficult rebottling the jinn can be.

    1. Re:Anybody here remember Napster? by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1

      Does anybody remember laughter?

    2. Re:Anybody here remember Napster? by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a reference to "Vera" off The Wall.

      --
      Squirrel!
  60. Back to school for you, son by flagg9483 · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_network A computer network is a group of interconnected computers. Networks may be classified according to a wide variety of characteristics. This article provides a general overview of some types and categories and also presents the basic components of a network. ... Functional relationship (network architecture) Computer networks may be classified according to the functional relationships which exist among the elements of the network, e.g., Active Networking, Client-server and Peer-to-peer (workgroup) architecture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer

    1. Re:Back to school for you, son by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      The point is there isn't any one network, the way there was a Napster network.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  61. High Time by b4upoo · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It's the right time to develop torrent protocols that are multi source and multinational in such a way that individual governments can do nothing to disrupt them. We also need to protect those less able at computing by using untraceable ISPs and encrypted methods of delivery such that no accusation of infringement can be made.
              So it's a call to white hats, black hats, gray hats and people who just love freedom to get busy, write the code and get it into the hands of just about everyone. Keep in mind that everyone from kiddies to grandmas like to download so stupid-simple interaction with such torrent systems is the right way to build.

  62. um. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, people still use torrents?

  63. Re:Is it me. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    It's part of a long term experiment.

    And yes, as long as I've been a member they have done something to make it worse.

    Some of the experiments they have tried have been really hideous.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  64. Re: missing a zero, I hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always seed to .999 then cut off.
    I do it for the lulz.

  65. 8 servers by swilver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where will the bittorrent community ever find EIGHT servers... this is insurmountable.

  66. Re:UI Design Fail. by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

    Not everyone who knows how to use RSS prefers to use RSS.

  67. Re:sssssh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but digital archiving has been around since the birth of the computer. I'd like to see the public boycott major entertainment companies if p2p takes a dive. Idk about the rest of you but being able to preview before I buy has not saved me money, simply it has allowed me to spend my money on what i like. You all know what i'm talking about... who here hasn't spent an outrageous amount on at least a dozen times on a crappy game/movie and never actually played it more than 1 or 2 times because it sucked so bad? Also for the music side p2p has allowed for so many small/no-name groups to get exposure.

    Who the hell would buy a car before test driving the thing? Look, all I'm saying is that as a consumer I spend more now on media now than before torrents. This is a simple concept; I have a perfect understanding of the content once I've been able to experience it. At that point I wish to have a legal copy to add to my library. Most importantly, this sale helps the specific artist and I can then expect that they will continue to produce more and even hope that said artist will come play a show in my area. We also know that word of mouth plays such a large roll in this scenario also. If I haven't heard/watched/played any of the media I can't recommend it. If I can't recommend it, many of my friends would have no idea that some of these bands, games and movies exist or are even worth watching.

    The RIAA is on a mission to come down on the masses so that they can reap ungodly amounts from the consumers. The artists won't see any of these settlements.

    Also, by show of hands, who else downloads free/open source from TPB or other trackers (and by free, i mean legally free). I've been notified by comcast that I've been downloading illegal stuff. Comcast got a not-so-forgiving letter explaining that it is not illegal to download ubuntu via torrent. Next they are going to tell me it's illegal to connect to the internet because the internet may contain information!

    I can see it now,a police officer saying, "boy, you can't play your music that loud! There are others here that haven't paid the $20 for that CD. I'm going to have to place you under arrest." Later you get a $250,000 fine, violated by your cell mate, and end up selling a kidney and your left testicle to pay your fine so you don't have to be homeless because the courts ordered you to sign over your checks for the next 10-15 years.

    JUSTICE! whats that word mean again?

    (on another note, is it coincidence that my security word to submit this post was 'beatnik')

  68. Re:UI Design Fail. by hattig · · Score: 1

    Mmm real ale. There's something that doesn't stall firefox itself. Maybe the ability to use firefox! :p

    I'm glad to see that adventure in unusable front pages died quickly.

    And yes, the Campaign for Usable Websites : CAMUW. First target: Slashdot.

  69. Re:UI Design Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHAT quality userbase?

  70. Re:UI Design Fail. by nicodoggie · · Score: 1

    I dunno about "quality user base" but I hope this, at least, discourages those damn Niggerbuntu and ninn1e posters, they're really getting annoying.

  71. Re:UI Design Fail. by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I still get a narrow story column and a ton of wasted whitespace.

    Well if they used it, it wouldn't be whitespace, now would it?

  72. Why should The Pirate Bay be shut down? by Troberg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The ones who wants to shut it down do not have the power to do so. The only ones with that power is the people who runs it, and they are not going to shut it down, especially not as they've been continiously harassed by the ones who want it shut down.

    They have redundant servers spread all over the world, some of them in server halls at ISPs that will not allow the police to just enter and shut them down. They also have several servers that are not active now, but which could be activated if need be.

    Add to this that the last time they tried to shut them down, they recieved donations of new servers, money, server hall space and fast internet connections from both ordinary people and companies, emerging stronger than before and was running within three days. Now, they are prepared, and the same pattern will happen again. If attempts are made to shut them down, they will get more support and emerge stronger.

    I can even tell you how the trial will go:

    * They will be found guilty in the first trial, as the judge and "nÃmndemÃn" (not a jury, but an advisory group of "trustworthy people") are politically appointed, and will get orders from their parties to convict.
    * They will appeal. The next court is not politically appointed, so it will instead look at the law. Swedish law allows linking to possibly illegal content, and there are precendents showing that such an interpretation holds up in court. In other words, they will be found not guilty. This is also in line with tradition, as everyone accused of file sharing who have appealed to this court has been found not guilty.
    * The public attourney may appeal, and once again get his butt spanked. It's not entirely sure that he will do this, though, as this court has the power to set precedents. Another file sharer have been paid large sums of money by the media industry to not appeal, as they do not want to lose here.
    * The case will go to the European court, which, at least on paper, should test if the Swedish courts have followed Swedish law. If it does it's job, they will once again be found not guilty.

    Also, don't forget that these guys are activists, they will not back away from a fight. I wouldn't be surprised if they were to appeal even if they won in the first trial, just to make sure that they won in a court high enough to set a precedent.

    Worth noting is that there are strong evidence of taking bribes against Jim Keyzer, the corrupt police who headed the investigation. Roswall, the public attourney, similarly is also suspected of various kinds of corruption and breaches of protocol. BodstrÃm, the minister of justice who initiated this spectacle broke three out of our four constitutions in order to make this happen, and this will also taint the case.

    1. Re:Why should The Pirate Bay be shut down? by woolpert · · Score: 1

      Also, don't forget that these guys are activists, they will not back away from a fight.

      Maybe I'm just old and cynical - but I believe they are capitalists, not activists, and will only stay in the fight so long as the ad money from running the servers themselves is assured.

  73. My name is Legion, for we are many. by vorlich · · Score: 1

    Of course absolutely nothing will appear out of the series of tubes, now will it?

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  74. Too Big to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, much like the banks in America, TPB is too big to fail, can we expect a bailout for them sometime soon?

  75. So What? by Theoboley · · Score: 0

    If the torrent doesn't start in seconds or minutes... I let mine run all day while i'm at work. It doesn't bother me that they won't start downloading in a matter of seconds..

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  76. Of more immediate concern by mpgalvin · · Score: 1

    Despite the hype about the bittorrent "network" the first thing on Sweden's agenda should be the adverse affect on their peering relationships.

    1. Re:Of more immediate concern by Troberg · · Score: 1

      No, the first thing on our agenda must be to uphold our law, and our law does allow linking to and indexing of copyrighted content, which is all TPB (and, for example, Google) does. If that pisses of some other nation, so be it.

  77. Re:UI Design Fail. by Inda · · Score: 1

    What about all the ActiveX IE6 was blocking at work last week? If the text hadn't been in English, I could have sworn I was surfing Korean sites.

    ActiveX? C'mon, on this site too? Disgusting.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  78. Re: missing a zero, I hope? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

    i had 103:1 on a cbb soundtrack torrent once. I was only keeping it there as a record after a certain amount. Server seriously crashed later so i had to redl everything and my total ratio is like .6 from the 6:1 i had before. I should really backup my azureus files to keep ratios. I feel like such a leech

  79. Re:UI Design Fail. by daveime · · Score: 1

    Yes, the comma works well, but possibly better might have been the use of the word "even", although enclosing the whole phrase in brackets would have been overkill.

    Wish I had mod points for the finest subliminal dig at MSIE I've seen in a long time.

  80. Re:UI Design Fail. by mdm42 · · Score: 1

    And here I always thought it was just adblock detritus...

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
  81. Re:Obama comments on Judd Gregg's withdrawl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It especially makes sense if you're trying to obfuscate what you're doing - namely orchestrating the largest transfer of wealth and power in human history from citizens to their overlords.

  82. Or, to put it a differently by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "Windmills do not work that way!!"

  83. Re:UI Design Fail. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I believe it was introduced after the better part of a decade of people whining about how they wanted to be able to "moderate" stories as well as posts.

  84. your bandwidth or cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that's why they normally have donation sections where you can paypal them some money that will to running the site. In return, they give you download credit.

  85. Underground to the rescue ! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    another time for warez scene to save the liberties big buck tries to deny people.

    no, this is not an uninformed zealot rant, and i am able to elaborate it with historic proofs and examples, but it is a friday night -> you'll have to do with your own memory.

  86. Don't you believe it.... by westlake · · Score: 1, Informative
    one of the guys running the site said they had made arrangements such that the actual hardware is no longer under their direct control, so even if they are all found guilty, it would be outside their ability to shut it down, even if ordered to do so by a court.

    There are few better ways to piss off a judge than to go into court with an argument like this. You Are Not A Lawyer

    1. Re:Don't you believe it.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 1

      And what's the judge going to do if the bulk of the operation is outside his jurisdiction? Last I heard was that American banning online poker didn't also kill it in the UK.

    2. Re:Don't you believe it.... by westlake · · Score: 2, Funny

      And what's the judge going to do if the bulk of the operation is outside his jurisdiction? Introduce you to the elemental pleasures of a 6x8 cell and a bunk mate named Lenny.

    3. Re:Don't you believe it.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a bummer, but it wont shut down TPB, might even turn these guys into martyrs in the eyes of their peers...

    4. Re:Don't you believe it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's a bummer

      Yes, and his name is Lenny

      I'm here all week, try the veal...

  87. Re:UI Design Fail. by ThatFunkyMunki · · Score: 0

    For some reason this option doesn't exist for me... When I'm replying to a comment, all I see are the 4 buttons under the text box that say "Preview," "Quote Parent," "Options," and "Cancel." Where'd the post anonymously option disappear to?

    --
    If patriotism is racist, is racism patriotic?
  88. Not TPB! They support IPv6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no! They started to support IPv6 lately http://thepiratebay.org/blog/146 What else would I use now?

  89. Re:UI Design Fail. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    Heh... I turned off all the new stuff.. but now the subject and comment text boxes are shoved WAY to the right..and so the comment on goes past the edge of the browser window into the black border..

  90. Got any wipes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Office, coffee, mouthful, your post, projectile, new 16:9 HD LCD ... you get the picture.

  91. Re:UI Design Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Above the comment box

  92. Re:UI Design Fail. by ThatFunkyMunki · · Score: 0

    Nope, nothing there but the e-mail address settings

    --
    If patriotism is racist, is racism patriotic?
  93. Re:UI Design Fail. by Danse · · Score: 1

    What browser? Working fine for me in Firefox 3.0.6. Wide story column and everything else seems fine once I turned off the stupid Beta index option.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  94. Re:Is it me. by fr4nk · · Score: 0

    The admins are probably just going with the masses since nobody here reads the summaries anyway, let alone the articles.

  95. Re:Is it me. by Junior+Samples · · Score: 0

    Go to Preferences > Index and disable Beta Index (should be the first checkbox). I've had mine disabled for a long time and I never see any significant changes to the UI I know and love.

    Idle is still green though :P

    Thank You. Slashdot pages load seem faster as well.

  96. Other trackers will be overloaded? No. by darpo · · Score: 1

    Other *public* trackers might be overloaded, but meanwhile anyone who knows what they're doing will already be on an invite-only tracker.

    And don't forget that this has happened before. Remember when Suprnova died? Other sprang up in its place.

  97. The answer... by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Find a country with the following conditions:
    1.Stable government (long-running dictatorship might work even better than a democracy for this since a change of govt might mean a change of views on IP)
    2.Doesn't need the US or "western countries" to stay alive (which is why Russia failed with allofmp3, they need the WTO and the west to stay around)
    3.Has acceptable pipes to the rest of the world
    4.Government doesn't respect western IP laws

    Just put the illegal stuff in such a country.

    Maybe Cuba could work, they have a stable communist government, no love for the US (and the US has no love back) and are building some new fiber lines AFAIK. Only question is whether the Cuban government respects western IP or not.

    What would the big media companies do against a server in a country that didnt respect western IP laws, would they pressure the government to invade? Ram through laws requiring US ISPs to IP block/null route these servers?

  98. Re:UI Design Fail. by Mozk · · Score: 1

    Here's a Stylish style I made that makes Slashdot not look like shit:
    http://pastebin.com/f39655fa6

    --
    No existe.
  99. Slapstick at it's finest!!! by rts008 · · Score: 1

    This whole campaign against copyright infringement has taken on comedic overtones of monumental proportions.

    I quit watching Saturday morning cartoons in lieu of keeping track of the MAFIAA's efforts to keep profitable buggywhip production going. It's like a Keystone Cops movie marathon.

    Two of my Grandfather's oft used phrases apply here:
    'Like trying to herd cats in a burning barn'
    and
    'Like trying to stuff a wet noodle up a wildcat's ass'

    Pure hilarity!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  100. Kermit! by tubegeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh my God! I had completely forgotten about the pain in the balls that was Kermit . . . . I had a client I used to have to upload stuff to using Kermit after the close of business. You'd do it the same every time, whether it'd work would seemingly depend on whether she was wearing a skirt or pants.

  101. You don't understand the why of this arrangement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This arrangement was made precisely to make sure that they couldn't shut Pirate Bay down even when forced or coerced by the judicial system.
    Yes, the police and such can make your life hell, even if you're in the right. The people behind Pirate Bay know this, they are not stupid. They also know how easy it would be for the authorities to say 'we can make your life hell unless you shut it down'. Illegal yes, but easy, and fighting it in court takes a long time and loads of money. So they said, we have a long term commitment to keeping the Pirate Bay up, so we must make sure that even we ourselves simply cannot shut it down, not even if we wanted to.

  102. Re:sssssh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, why should I wait for a TV show to be released on DVD, buy it, wait for it to be shipped to me when people, who live in the country where the show was made, get to watch it for free on TV?

  103. Still massively stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no content that the Pirate Bay had that is copyrighted by anyone. A bittorrent file is an original creation. Art, if you like. It has no resemblance to anything similarly named. Still, if it goes away, it represents one challenge to content distribution. There have been millions over the years. Every one of them has met with an increased ability to distribute content. Kill off TPB and 30 others will replace it, and 20 different methods for pushing content will arrive. Those running businesses with outdated business models have more to fear if they shut down TPB than if they left it alone. The always find out the hard way though. About 10 years ago, I had an uncle who thought spam seemed a legitimate means of advertising on the internet. About 8 years ago, he started changing his mind. About 7 years ago, he started hating it. Too late.

  104. Whatver, pops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your irrelevant wiki quotes aside, the fact that BitTorrent is a protocol in use by a large number of completely disparate networks remains. It does not constitute a single network.

  105. Re:Obama comments on Judd Gregg's withdrawl by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Hmm. You, Sir, make a very good point there. Unfortunately you've just given me a lot of work, finding out how closely that theory fits with the numbers. I don't suppose you could back it up with numbers (say, how much goes to banks that won't feed back to citizens vs. how much goes directly to welfare programs etc.) and save me the trouble?

  106. Netflix by tepples · · Score: 1

    A lot of shows are not worth buying on DVD because one viewing is your lifetime fill of them.

    But are they worth renting from Netflix or a foreign counterpart?

    1. Re:Netflix by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Not if you have seen them once.

      There is more entertainment than we can keep up with these days.

      Very few things are good enough to watch again vs something new recommended by friends with similar tastes that you haven't seen/heard/read yet.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  107. DVD is patented by tepples · · Score: 1

    Seriously folks, Gameboy games dont have this problem.

    But only because Nintendo no longer manufactures Game Boy Advance games. If you want to pirate handheld games, it's all DS now.

    Hey Hollywood. Get rid of DVD's. Just use proprietary hardware for movies

    Proprietary? DVD players are already non-free hardware. DVD's physical layer is patented, as are the MPEG-2 and Dolby Digital codecs.

    1. Re:DVD is patented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hollywood-DVD's are like a swimming-pool without a fence. Its a public nuisance, begging for pirating.
       
        Get rid of all DVD's!

  108. FUD news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has nothing to do with the protocol.

    Nuff said

  109. Freenet has anonymity and privacy for filesharing by FreenetFan · · Score: 1

    Freenet is quite usable at the moment, and there is a fair amount of file trading going on. It can easily handle whole albums in a few hours and DivX rips of movies in a day or so, depending on popularity.

    Once you install it, download the FMS (Freenet Messaging System) application, which is like anonymous Usenet, and make requests or offer uploads.

    The benefit is that no-one, not even your ISP or government agencies can see what you are uploading or downloading.

    It is also designed to be very difficult to censor. Currently it uses UDP for communication between Freenet nodes, with no real fingerprint to the traffic, so it is difficult for ISPs to filter without affecting things like VoIP or gaming.

    Should UDP filtering become more prevalent, it will move to another form of transport, ultimately ending up as steganography, where it disguises itself as some other encrypted protocol.

  110. Re:Freenet has anonymity and privacy for fileshari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which version?

  111. It can't happen fast enough to suit me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Because this torrent network is available and people with poor judgement have populated it with copyrighted material, a generation of young people have come to believe that file sharing of copyrighted material isn't stealing. I know you are all so proud of this technological wonder, but it is making me sorry for all the time and effort that went into the Internet to see it abused this way. Beyond that many torrent users don't know what is happening to their internet connections because no one told them when they installed their torrent clients that they would become servers.

    I used to have an open wifi for the neighbors hooked to my dsl. p2p caused my dsl to clog up and it became unusable for a year. Nothing could make me happier than to see torrent go belly up. It would reduce the internet traffic substantially if my neighbors didn't leave their torrents running 24x7. I will pray that tpb goes down asap. Then we can go back to teaching ethical behavior to the kids.