Slashdot Mirror


Linked In Or Out?

Mr_Whoopass writes "I am the IT Administrator for a regional restaurant chain, and as of late I am noticing more and more people sending me invitations to sites like LinkedIn, FaceBook, etc. Mother always taught me to be a skeptic, and, knowing more than the average Joe about how information can be used in this digital era, I am reticent to say the least about posting such personal details as my full name and where I work on the net for all to see. I have thus far managed to stay completely below the radar, and a search on Google has nothing on my real persona. However, now times are tough, and I see sales dropping in the industry I work in as it is a discretionary spending market to be sure. I wonder if I should loosen up on the paranoia a bit and start networking with some of these folks in case of the all too common layoff scenario that seems to be happening lately. What do other folks here think about this? I am specifically interested in what people who work in IT think (since I know that just about every moron who has 'Vice President' or sits on the 'Executive Team' is already on LinkedIn and has no clue about why they should be trying to protect their identity)."

474 comments

  1. First questions first by hugetoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's your real name allready?

    1. Re:First questions first by y00nix · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's your real name allready?

      What is your quest?

    2. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What... is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow in flight?

      Go ahead! Mod me redundant! I know you want to!

    3. Re:First questions first by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      What is your favorite color?

    4. Re:First questions first by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 4, Informative

      What's your real name allready?

      What is your quest?

      Blue! Arrrrrggg....

    5. Re:First questions first by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      How is this informative? I mean if you've never seen Monty Python and the Holy Grail then I guess... you've been warned.

    6. Re:First questions first by DimmO · · Score: 3, Funny

      1. Arthur, King of the Britons.
      2. To seek the Holy Grail.
      3. What? African or European Swallow?

    7. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck was that informative!?

    8. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah! So satisfying!

    9. Re:First questions first by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess the mods had Python's style of absurd humor...

    10. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      African or European?

    11. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue. No! Re--aaaaaaaaarrrrggg...!

    12. Re:First questions first by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Funny

      How did you know my real name was blue?

      I had always been careful about separating my online and offline self, but did break down recently and become active on linkedin. I hate giving up the privacy, but it is an easy way to network. I appreciate the importance of being able to find potential employees and clients. And, since one of my old major clients is laying off thousands of people who could bece future clients, might as well give up.

      Fortunately, google doesn't index whois yet, so parts of my identify are still intact.

      Privacy is an illusion.

      PK

    13. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your real name already?

      What is your quest?

      Why haven't you come up with new material in 34 years?

    14. Re:First questions first by x2A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Corrupt, not cowardly. Remember, it was a Brit (of the House of Lords in fact (read: unelected)) that invited him over to show to film. It was the home secretary of the elected government that got his visit rejected. I saw the interview of Lord Pearson (who invited him over) at Westminster, in front of a bunch of reporters representing various newspapers and tv channels, trying to educate them on the importance of free speech. I don't think there's a more fitting picture for the times we live, than one of our unelected, trying to convince members of the press, the importance of freedom of expression. "He should be free to say it, and we should be free to ridicule him for it". Never underestimage the driving force, the motivation, of saving face. This is how people learn. Taking it away does not have good consequences.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    15. Re:First questions first by x2A · · Score: 1

      "If they hate us, we should be free to hate them. It's only fair"

      "Fair"?!! How old are you, six?! You're talking like someone took one of your sweets and now you want one of theirs. Far be it for you to be able to actually rise above something and ask a more important question than whether's fair, like whether it's productive. "They blew people up, why can't I?" or maybe "he raped a girl, why can't I?". Yeah because that's really gonna help. You really wanna find all the scummy things going on in the world and use that as justification for doing them yourself? Why don't you help us all out and just stop breathing, or possibly, if it's any less hassle, just grow up.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    16. Re:First questions first by sukotto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the European Swallow flies an average of 11 meters per second so that's half the answer there.

      For some great analysis on the topic, read this: http://www.style.org/unladenswallow/

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    17. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please. stop. feeding. the. trolls.

    18. Re:First questions first by woot+account · · Score: 1

      Says the person posting xkcd comics, which have outworn their welcome even faster.

    19. Re:First questions first by akayani · · Score: 1

      According to Google I'm 'the vampire killer'. On Thursday, I googled a friend I haven't seen in 15 years, found him on Linkedin and on Friday night we had dinner and 3 bottles of wine. (There was a lot to talk about) Not being too anonymous has some advantages. It's not all negative.

    20. Re:First questions first by saxoholic · · Score: 2, Informative

      What... is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow in flight?

      About 24 miles per hour

    21. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      African or European?

      I don't know...

    22. Re:First questions first by mudshark · · Score: 1

      His name is Robert Paulson.

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
    23. Re:First questions first by x2A · · Score: 1

      Not everyone with a differing opinion is a troll, some do believe what they say, and when what they say is that far and obviously wrong, it falls on the rest of the world to correct them, or at least point in the right direction ("can lead a horse to water" and all that). Feedback is how people learn.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    24. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on! Mod underrated and redundant for +5 redundant! I know we can do this.

    25. Re:First questions first by zimtmaxl · · Score: 1

      I like his Mom ...

      --
      how IT is changing the world - http://max.zamorsky.name
    26. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the coconut ?

    27. Re:First questions first by Jurily · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I guess the mods had Python's style of absurd humor...

      What, you never modded a goatse link Insightful? I mean, literally.

    28. Re:First questions first by daveime · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, old jokes rehash you !

      Now STFU until you grow a sense of humour, or at least a sense of irony.

    29. Re:First questions first by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      MY EYES

      The horrors!!!

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    30. Re:First questions first by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Congratulations on seeing how ridiculous my statements were.

      Now look around you, and at the GP post and see if you can see what I'm saying. There was no need to add sarcasm tags because this is far too serious a subject for sarcasm. Take a look at history, and you'll notice that the rise of the nazi party didn't have anything to do with gassing jews, it was all about better rights for the average German, a better deal for the German, because you can see how people who control all the money are fucking you over. If you can't see a parallel between those early days and the current situation in Europe viz Muslims and terrorism, you're not looking very hard. I could make a film just like the Dutch MP Geert Wilders but it would present Christianity in exactly the same light. Does that mean all Christians are terrorists ? Should such a pointless and deliberately divisive film be accorded the special honour of being presented to members of our government ? My point about it not being fair was taken from the attitude presented in an article written by a current member of the UK Liberal-Democrat party. I find that scary and as you noticed, childish. When the most moderate members of a democratic society find it necessary to stoop to hate speech and playground politics, I think we are all in danger.

      I would have linked the MP's article, but I made the mistake 2 weeks ago (when I first came across it) of emailing said MP and calling him out on it. Consequently, and unsurprisingly, that article has disappeared from the NSS site ! But although I didn't think to make a note of the URL, I did copy the text -

      Is it extreme to defend free speech?

      By Dr Evan Harris (MP and NSS Honorary Associate)

      When is a liberal like me an extremist? When, in the words of Asghar Bukhari, chairman of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, I defend the right of Salman Rushdie to offend the likes of Mr Bukhari - and defend the Government for knighting the novelist. At least that was what Mr Bukhari screeched at me in a televised rant recently.

      True, Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses was insulting and offensive to Muslims. But that is no basis to deny him an honour. In fact the reaction of Islamic extremists to his work - with al Qaeda's Ayman al-Zawahiri now threatening retaliation against Britain for the knighthood - underlines precisely why he should be honoured. To recognise our society's values and freedoms as well as the talent it contains.

      And in one sense, Mr Bukhari was right about my own "extremist" views. For I will stop at nothing to protect the rights of people like him to be offensive and wrong.

      But I will not tolerate the persistent demands, led by Muslim activists, for special protection for religious views. People should be allowed to attack religious ideas in ways which adherents may find offensive - whether by criticism, lampoon or even insult.

      I organised the Parliamentary campaign that last year voted down "by a margin of one" a Government plan to outlaw the incitement of religious hatred. Recent outbursts by the likes of Mr Bukhari make that vote all the more crucial for freedom of expression.

      Those who argue for such laws say that one should separate the person from the ideology: hate the sin but love the sinners. But I don't just hate Nazism, for instance. I hate Nazis. We should all hate Nazis. It is not just their ideology which is loathsome, they are loathsome people. So I believe I should be entitled to incite hatred of Nazis, short of inciting violence. My words ought not to be intimidating to any Nazi of fragile disposition. But the language I used could well - I hope - be insulting to any self-respecting Nazi.

      And in the same way, I should also have the freedom to advise others to hate jihadism or homophobic bigotry. I should not be criminalised for promoting hatred of Islamic jihadists or fundamentalist Christian homophobic bigots. After all, they have the freedom to promote hatred of free-speech loving, gay- rights campaigni

    31. Re:First questions first by sukotto · · Score: 1

      The author revised his number to 8.8 meters per second, or 20 miles per hour

      http://www.style.org/unladenswallow/update/

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    32. Re:First questions first by CyBlue · · Score: 2, Funny

      AHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    33. Re:First questions first by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I don't know about him, but mine's mcgrew. I take it from your user name (your real name as well?) that you live here in Springfield, too?

    34. Re:First questions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is about typical for Slapshotters these days someone asks an reasonable question and all they get is dumb assed jerkoff answers from grade e plonkers and people wonder why i have renamed it to SlapShot
        if the mods had any brains they would can the vast majority of comments/answers from a lot of users on here Nuff said

      Not anonymous just think the mods are tossers

    35. Re:First questions first by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      What exactly the fuck does being elected (or not) have to do with promoting free speech? Nothing. There is nothing at all which prevents someone who hasn't been elected to any body, for example you or me, championing free speech.

    36. Re:First questions first by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      What a troll. Dr Evan Harris' letter mostly was spot on.

      Of course one should have the freedom to confront unsupported or falsified beliefs, to shun, fire or otherwise boycott those who espouse such beliefs, and to seek to prevent those who hold such beliefs from hijacking the law to suppress their opponents' views.

      Anybody who argues their right to hate, and encourages others to do so, is an idiot, and is probably up to no good.

      So you not only wish to outlaw what people say on the basis of how it might make people feel (even people who believe utter nonsense, and don't like having it pointed out that it is utter nonsense) but you want to outlaw an emotion you, um... hate? Well, that would put most of the Jews, Muslims, gender feminists, and Slashdot posters behind bars, as well as those who hate pedophiles, upper class white men, gender feminists, telemarketers, politicians, estate agents, advertising executives...and those who hate those who hate.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    37. Re:First questions first by x2A · · Score: 1

      "the rise of the nazi party didn't have anything to do with gassing jews"

      Correct, it was mostly fueled by the fact that Germany was strangled by the sanctions put in place against them after WW1.

      "If you can't see a parallel between those early days and the current situation in Europe viz Muslims and terrorism, you're not looking very hard"

      Perhaps you're looking too hard?

      "would you allow the nazi party to assume power, given what you already know, just because they get a majority in an election?"

      See you learn a different message to me... the one I take from it is about not strangling nations of people, giving them something to have to rise up against. Getting rid of speech doesn't get rid of the thoughts behind it, it just pushes it underground, and gives you enemies you can't fight because you can't find them, or "asymetric warfare" as they call it. But, as it happens, I don't believe that "whoever gets the most people to agree with them" is the best way to pick leaders of countries, because, as you say, most people don't look further than their own pockets. If the press industry was forced to be honest with people, that may be a different story, but without a real world example, it's impossible to speculate.

      "I could make a film just like the Dutch MP Geert Wilders but it would present Christianity in exactly the same light. Does that mean all Christians are terrorists?"

      Firstly, what's this "all" business? We're talking about extremists using their religion to justify their actions. It doesn't matter what the religion is, it's the actions not the beliefs that are a problem. If you look back over the last couple thousand years, there have been huge numbers of people killed in the name of christianity, and yes, those people were just as bad... their numbers just happen to be somewhat thinner now.

      To remove freedom of speech to "protect" people from thinkin bad things is plain ridiculous, we need to grow up not carry on living as children. It's thinking too much along the "treat the symptoms, not the cause" school of thought, and it will get us nowhere. If you wanna make changes, you have to look beyond the what's, like what germany did, and look at the why's... and you won't find anything out, without the freedom of exchange of information, and that my friend, requires absolute freedom of speech. Anything less is just enforced ignorance.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    38. Re:First questions first by x2A · · Score: 1

      "What exactly the fuck does being elected (or not) have to do with promoting free speech?"

      I see you use the word 'fuck' to indicate you missing the point... well done you.

      "for example you or me"

      'You or me' aren't an unelected ruling body, a controversial ruling body that inspires the disdain of so many of the people they rule over, who complain that they shouldn't have power because they're not democratically selected by the people... democracy supposedly being the good thing that gives power to the people, so why is it not the elected that are doing the right thing? "Democracy is like three fox's and a chicken voting on what to have for dinner"... Churchill said the best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with your average voter. This is the point. It's a demonstration of democracy failing in it's purpose, it's a demonstration that arguments against the House of Lords based on the fact that they're unelected, are flawed, as per the result, rather than the ideals.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  2. Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by tsa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know many people for whom LinkedIn was important in getting a new job. Not only can people see what you have done, but more importantly, LinkedIn shows potential employers who you know, which is valuable information to them. They can choose you above someone else because of the people they know, and will be incorporated in the company's network by hiring you.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by tsa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oops I should have used the preview button. What I wanted to say was: LinkedIn shows to potential employers the professionals you know, which is valuable information to them. They can choose you above someone else because of the people you know, and will be incorporated in the company's network by hiring you.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or vv.. they can choose NOT to hire you based on the people you know.

    3. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by schon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LinkedIn shows to potential employers the professionals you know, which is valuable information to them.

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      They can choose you above someone else because of the people you know, and will be incorporated in the company's network by hiring you.

      Again, how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job?

      And if the answer is "it doesn't, but they might want to know anyway" - why isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

    4. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Swizec · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Clients and crowdsourcing.

      The more and better people you know, the more clients you can potentially reel in and, of course, the more people from your field you know, the quicker you'll find someone who can help you out of a snag.

      In short, they're counting on the idea that hiring you they're implicitly also hiring all of your professional contacts - completely for free.

    5. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by nabsltd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For example, I am first-level connected to several people who have written a moderately well-known RFC. I have more direct access to them than the average person, and I can pick their brain for free.

      If I was hunting for a job in that particular field, then my connections might help, especially if the people doing the hiring know those names (even if they don't know the people personally).

      On the other hand, I can't see a reason why somebody would not hire me just because I know somebody. For example, I have first-level connections to people that I have done business with (provided them consulting, etc.), but I'm not drinking buddies with (i.e., I don't know everything about them). Now, it's possible that those people are real slime except when dealing with me, but even if they are, it doesn't mean anything...I didn't say I recommended them, just that I know them.

    6. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Kneo24 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your questions are really simple to answer.

      A lot of the companies I've worked for think of themselves as one big family. Because of that, they will hire people other employees know so that there's less of a chance of in fighting and more of a chance of teamwork. It helps to keep the big happy family image.

      They will even consider hiring the friends of their worst employees. Don't ask me why, but they do.

      There is that off chance that who you know could hurt you, but that's probably small. Just don't keep friends or contacts who are total dick bags and it shouldn't bite you in the ass.

    7. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by hedwards · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I thought affirmative action was supposed to kill that. Or perhaps I just dreamed that. That is perhaps the worst way to manage a company. People should be able to work together, but blurring the lines between work and not work is really dangerous.

      When lay offs come or somebody needs to be let go. Chummy coworkers that are a bit too comfortable with each other. There are any number of ways in which that can blow up and damage the company's productivity.

    8. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Cowmonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      Do you have soft skills? Do you have to work with other companies or service providers on a regular basis? It largely depends on what your company does, but there are a LOT of reasons why knowing people in a field is an advantage, and having someone you can work with to establish a relationship or you know has worked with someone (possibly difficult) before is an advantage.

      Again, how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job?

      I suggest you talk to someone who makes a living getting people hired. Its about marketing your self. You could be the Stephen Hawking of computer programming but it means jack if you know no one and only have some very limited references.

      Really, LinkedIn is a tool to use to your advantage if you need to. A very useful and underestimated tool. The advantages are fairly obvious and the drawbacks negligible. If you can't reason that out then again I suggest you speak with a career services professional to find out (provided you need to).

      And if the answer is "it doesn't, but they might want to know anyway" - why isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

      And that kind of arguing is called "self defeating". The vast majority of people will hire you despite who you know rather than not. If they think someone is a tool that's their problem. You don't have to let that become an issue. But if you are a medium sized business, knowing people is power.

    9. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Captain+Hook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      Coming from an IT background, we view work as something which we can personally accomplish. It's what we know and how we apply it which is important.

      But there are many roles, especially high up the corporate ladder, where it's who you know which becomes important not what you know. Maybe IT guys aren't really the main market for Linked In.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    10. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Affirmative action only serves to force the hiring of unqualified minorities. If you think that hiring people that are friends is a bad idea, you've obviously never worked somewhere where they definitely weren't. This is especially true when the forced hire is dead weight so everyone else has to take up their slack.

    11. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A lot of the companies I've worked for think of themselves as one big family.

      So do many cults...

    12. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      What you say is true, but it is always easier to evaluate someone with a connection than a complete unknown. Also, it is more effective to recruit from friends of employees than a faceless ad or recruiter.

    13. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is the most backwards comment I've ever read. How is affirmative action not blurring "work and not work", as you put it? Unless you believe that somebody's ability to work is actually tied to their race.

      I'd hate to see where you work: a racially diverse team where people barely tolerate each other and nobody was hired based on their credentials. Now there's a recipe for success.

    14. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by robogobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...until they figure out that LinkedIn is just MySpace wearing a suit, and you don't really *know* the people you know.

    15. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      So can becoming a freemason.

      That's the original "linked in" Ive nailed many a job simply because I had the ring on my hand. It makes it easy for a brother mason to choose between candidates.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by dmizer · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what reference letters and a reference list is for?

      Seriously, it's not like the internet invented corporate networking.

    17. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me?...how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job?

      In cold hard facts? Probably nothing. In terms of applied primate psychology - i.e., "dealing with people" - a heck of a lot.

      why isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

      Because primates often operate on the "better the devil you know than the one you don't" principle. They greatly fear the unknown.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    18. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what affirmative action has to do with this specifically, so I'll just ignore that part and let you explain it further.

      However, this isn't necessarily a bad way to manage a company. It's just sometimes easier to recruit people based off of a recommendation of someone you already know. Keep in mind that the more important position, the less of a chance that someone will give you a bad recommendation. The recommendation also reflects on them. There's just some people I know that I would never recommend, and I'd hope they never try to do the same for me.

      People should be able to work together, but blurring the lines between work and not work is really dangerous.

      That thought is fragmented. I have no idea what you're trying to get at there.

      People should be able to work together, but they necessarily can't always. There's some people I've worked with that I just simply can not stand to be around because of conflicting personalities. You run into that less if you have like minded individuals around you.

      Just because your friend is working with you doesn't mean people are going to think it's "fun time". Very rarely will you run into a situation where you find goofing off because of this more than you'll find goofing off any other time.

      When lay offs come or somebody needs to be let go. Chummy coworkers that are a bit too comfortable with each other. There are any number of ways in which that can blow up and damage the company's productivity.

      Layoffs can backfire regardless of the situation, chummy coworkers or not.

    19. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by PPH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of the companies I've worked for think of themselves as one big family.

      Well, I'm outa there. The 'big happy family' meme is code for the bosses idiot nephew or doper son-in-law needs to be looked after. Sorry, but I owe an employer a professional relationship and that's all they owe me. Part of that is to treat people with respect and not to pick fights.

      more of a chance of teamwork.

      Teamwork is OK, but its not a part of being a big happy family. Not many families cut bad members or send them down to the minor leagues.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    20. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by ddmcd · · Score: 0

      I know many people for whom LinkedIn was important in getting a new job.

      Linkedin won't get you a job. But it might improve your chances of connecting with people who can refer you to jobs. You have to use it as part of a strategy that includes more than Linkedin especially if you are in a professional field. (I address this topic here: http://www.ddmcd.com/basics.html )

      --
      web site: http://www.ddmcd.com
    21. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by daveime · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Seems like someone got modded into oblivion just recently and has a chip on his shoulder.

      AND, I'll probably get +5 insightful for it, because it is !

    22. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by dropadrop · · Score: 1

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      Depends what you do... Atleast for someone working in Security contacts can be extremly valuable. On the other hand my potential employer could not access my Linkedin contacts so moot...

    23. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by master811 · · Score: 1

      Have you never heard the saying, "It's not what you know, but who you know"?

      There's your answer.

    24. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by fprintf · · Score: 1

      I have a whole family on my mother's side, dating back several centuries, that have been masons in Scotland, Wales and eventually England. However I just cannot get past having to "state a belief in a supreme deity". No agnostics allowed, apparently. It's too bad since I am the first of the family not to become a mason.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    25. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      That's one of the more naive questions I've seen on Slashdot in a while. The answer is that typically, it doesn't. Before it matters how well you can do your job though you have to actually GET the job. .. Heard the expression it's not what you know, it's who you know?

      Do you think these hotshot CEO's that make gazillions of dollars a year all got there on talent alone?

      Depending on the position who you know can have MORE of an influence on whether you get a particular job than what you know. It doesn't necessarily mean you'll be better at the job when you get there, but we're talking about getting jobs, not being good at them once you've got them.

    26. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Phoenixhawk · · Score: 1

      Is This Good for The COMPANY?

    27. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      We wouldn't have had phrases like "its not what you know, but who you know" if it wasn't true in some respects.

      Who you know, can't get you in if you don't know anything. But generally amongst a pool of some what equally qualified people, its the little differences that they like about you more than what you know that counts. Everyone that's gotten that far can do the job. At that point, its more of can this person work well with his coworkers? If you are friends with 5 employees of theirs, then they'd have a reason to believe that you can.

    28. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by defaria · · Score: 1

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      Surely you jest! I don't know about you but my professional references and friends not only present a picture of who I am, but they are the people who I call upon to sometimes help me with professional problems. There's been more than one time where I've referred a friend or asked a friend for help on a particular work related issue. Maybe you should get some better friends?

      Again, how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job? And if the answer is "it doesn't, but they might want to know anyway" - why isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

      Certainly who you know reflects on you and most people will not put on their resume or on linkedin, their enemies or people who would not recommend you at all. You know employers, and fellow employees, hire not only a machine who will do the job but a person that all of your coworkers will have to live with? Which would you want to work with, a person with no social skills, can't get along with others and who is introverted but good at what he does or somebody who's outgoing, friendly, has shown a track record of working and succeeding with others? Me, I'd prefer the latter. People work together and having somebody who's good at what he does but is a total isolationist/loner is now what I'd call a good potential employee. That said I've never understood the total paranoid attitude of the OP. I refuse to live my life hiding from others - I participate in life.

    29. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Doggabone · · Score: 1

      ...until they figure out that LinkedIn is just MySpace wearing a suit, and you don't really *know* the people you know.

      "They" would be delighted to be connected to such a successful social network "wearing a suit" - if they made the connection. Weak social interactions are equally as important as strong ones, and in labour/business markets potentially more important. The people you *know* share the same information you already do - the people you're linked to but don't *know* are sources of new information and new connections. They're bridges to other social and business circles. LinkedIn is Granovetter's theory of Weak Ties gone all digital like - http://www.analytictech.com/networks/weakties.htm. (No, I'm no expert on sociology or on economics - caveat yada yada.)

      In your personal life, it's your true friends that matter. In business, it's your acquaintances too.

    30. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LinkedIn is also a valuable way to do a job search without actually posting yourself on the career websites. Some HR divisions of companies scour those websites to find current employees that are performing job searches. I don't know about you, but I rather not have my HR division know that I am engaged in a job search. There are a lot of head hunters out there on LinkedIn and you can get your name out fast, under HR's radar, all in one felt swoop. All you have to do is "get connected" with a few of them and update your status when you are ready to perform a job search. I wouldn't worry about privacy. It's not like they install you with an RFID chip or anything of the sort. You control what you put up, and you get out of it what you put into it.

    31. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by MrPerfekt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's the whole point of LinkedIn, it's supposed to be work-related and have nothing to do with your non-professional life. You could look at it like just another social network but it's not setup to be like that. You can't post a bunch of pictures of what you did this weekend and get people's inane comments on them.

      When it comes to 'chummy co-workers', I'm going to go out on a limb and say a vast majority of companies probably prefer co-workers that get along and are comfortable with each other because it leads to effective communication. Sure, relationships can go sour and outside influences can mess with that but in many cases you see the people you work with more hours per day than your spouse. Most reasonable people can see that and put small issues aside that would otherwise taint a non-professional relationship.

      What I'm trying to get at here is that friendly is better than hostile 100% of the time and these tools like LinkedIn that get us just a little bit closer to each other are a good thing when used properly. I'm venturing to guess there is a very tiny fraction of the time that this information available online can be used for bad intentions. But hey, so can a phonebook.

      --
      I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    32. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by datababe72 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've never decided to hire someone just by looking at who they know.

      BUT, I have looked to see if I know anyone they know, so that I can get an informal recommendation. The more senior the position, the more I want to hear about a candidate from people I trust who have worked with that candidate. Those positions require skills that are hard to really check for on a resume.

      Also, when I applied for the job I hold right now, I did so via a connection I unearthed on LinkedIn- I saw the job posting, decided I wanted to apply for it, thenturned to my LinkedIn network to see if any of my friends knew anyone at the company. Someone did, so I submitted my resume that way rather than just responding to the job posting.

    33. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by aunt+edna · · Score: 1

      I know many people for whom LinkedIn was important in getting a new job. Not only can people see what you have done, but more importantly, LinkedIn shows potential employers who you know, which is valuable information to them. They can choose you above someone else because of the people they know, and will be incorporated in the company's network by hiring you.

      ffs!

      I've read a client-colleague's LinkedIn entry & he has a reference posting from one of his colleagues that makes hime look efficient, clued in and admired by his team. None of that guff is true, not remotely true. I speak from experience & direct observation, of him & his team, too.

    34. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      I met someone once when I was a field tech. Only once, we got to talking and added each other to our linkedin network. I have gotten several side jobs from people he knew, not even him. We recommended each other. That is the value of networking rather than going to an old fashoned interview in a monkey suite and having them check your network. I really don't think most people even Google their job candidates... yet.

      Again, how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job?

      And if the answer is "it doesn't, but they might want to know anyway" - why isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

      They probably wouldn't decide not to hire you based on your network. But I could see how it might be a benefit to show them you are connected. It would depend on the industry you work in. Always use discretion remember what happened when you posted those pics on Myspace.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    35. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Americano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Coming from an IT background, we view work as something which we can personally accomplish. It's what we know and how we apply it which is important.

      And frankly, that view of work as something which "we can personally accomplish" is outdated and does not scale in any company larger than a hundred or so people, maybe even less. There is virtually NO job description in IT at any company above a certain size which will not require you to be able to work with other people.

      Let's please dispense with the ridiculous illusion that IT people don't have to have social skills to do their job effectively. That's a comforting conceit for those in IT who are socially inept, but it is not the reality. You do not have to be best friends with everybody you work with. You DO have to be able to communicate and interact with others in a professional manner.Maybe you're the only email server admin or domain admin guy, but then you've got dozens or hundreds or thousands of customers you've got to work with. Maybe you're a developer; chances are you have to work with dba's and technical writers and other developers and business folks.

      Having a network on LinkedIn does not necessarily mean you are socially adept, but it is a bit of circumstantial evidence that at least a few people could handle working with your ass and didn't despise the experience enough to want nothing to do with you.

    36. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      I also think it only shows the professionals you know who were also suckered into LinkedIn.

      If the job in question is one that requires networking, then the qualified applicants for that job naturally be able to produce a long list of names and acquaintances without resorting to LinkedIn. Most other jobs will just require a good resume or c.v. and good references. LinkedIn does not substitute for either.

      No reputable employer is going to look at LinkedIn and say "ooh, he knows Bob, let's hire him!"

    37. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In business, it's your acquaintances too.

      The acquaintances I would ever have in LinkedIn, if I joined, which I won't, would be there to help me get a new job when I need one. They will not be resources for me to use on my current job. The whole point of LinkedIn as far as I can see is to be a network of "hey, you guys know anyone who is hiring?" people.

    38. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Maybe IT guys aren't really the main market for Linked In.

      And yet, the geekier one is, the more likely they'll have heard of Linked In and be a member.

    39. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In cold hard facts? Probably nothing. In terms of applied primate psychology - i.e., "dealing with people" - a heck of a lot.

      Which would make sense if a lot of people were on Linked In. Ie, 90% of everyone. Since it's much much lower than that (5%?) then there's not much point because your most valuable contacts won't be there.

    40. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LinkedIn shows to potential employers the professionals you know, which is valuable information to them.

      This is proving particularly valuable for employers looking at former Bush administration officials. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123518630430139343.html

    41. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by GreyDad · · Score: 1

      The idea is networking and getting to the people who can offer you a job. If people know who you are and what you can do, they might be know someone in their company who needs your skill set. I didn't get my current job from LinkedIn but through someone I has worked with in the past and whom I had kept in contact with (networking!).

    42. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm outa there. The 'big happy family' meme is code for the bosses idiot nephew or doper son-in-law needs to be looked after. Sorry, but I owe an employer a professional relationship and that's all they owe me. Part of that is to treat people with respect and not to pick fights.

      Uh, no. It can mean that, but it doesn't have to, nor is that usually the case. You'll find idiots in all type of positions they shouldn't be in, and they necessarily aren't relatives.

      I take it you're either self employed or are unemployed. I say this because a lot of companies like that stance and you don't seem to realize it.

      It's a lot easier to recruit people by going through people you already know. Offer a decent incentive ($50 or something). When it comes down to it, a lot of people will try to bring in someone they know they can trust because they know their reputation is on the line too. I like hanging out with my friends, but I know which ones would be worthless to have as a co-worker and which ones I could really trust.

    43. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Again, how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job?

      It isn't just knowing, it's establishing a relationship. And that is where a service like LinkedIn can be of use to potential employers--if they can figure out the extent of the relationship.

      Look at it this way, why does a manager generally make more than the workers under the manager? Because the worker 'knows' the one manager, but the manager 'knows' all the workers under him. The larger network means more power to effect the organization.

      Put another way, no matter how good you are at your job, you can get more done (and make more $ for your employer) if you can get other people (hopefully lesser paid people) to do your job for you. No matter how many widgets you can make in an hour, a team of people with you behind them with a whip can make more.

      And that is how your connection to other people will make you more valuable to an employer.

    44. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The time that I had one of those "big happy family" environments, it was nothing like what you describe. It involved working for a company where all but the senior management were early-to-mid 20-somethings. We all liked the same kinds of music and all liked going to the same kinds of bars and clubs. And since the company always had a large supply of beer and wine on hand, the office always served as a staging area before going to the bars and clubs.

      The company maintained an IRC-like server that served as both a hub for socializing with other workers as well as a means of communicating work-related issues. Parties and other outings/events were organized using that tool which was quite helpful when there was some emergency because it usually meant someone was available who could fix things without having to page someone who was off doing something else. The sysadmins loved it because they were able to cover for each other at times when it was more convenient so that they were interrupted less at times that it was less convenient.

      It all worked remarkably well. I'm not saying blurring the lines between work and socializing in the way that we did is always a good solution, but it was for us. The company got a lot more work out of people, but we also came out of it with friendships that lasted beyond our tenure at the company. And it wasn't until after I'd left the company that I realized how much harder I was having to work to maintain a social life without my access to the company's chat server. In retrospect, it was very similar to college in that way. And while I've had other jobs that I've enjoyed in the time since that job, I do wish I could find another environment like that one.

    45. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I signed up to LinkedIn a couple of months ago. Within 12 hours my spam inbox hit its highest level ever. I then resigned, and the spam level settled down to a little over the original level within a week.
      Maybe my spam filter is not as good as it could be, but I won't subscribe again.

    46. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by tqk · · Score: 1

      LinkedIn shows to potential employers the professionals you know, which is valuable information to them.

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      How do you define "know"? I define it as, "knows what I'm capable of", at least in work situations. Someone who knows me well enough to tell me to use them for a reference is very good to have, especially if they've a PhD after their name.

      They can choose you above someone else because of the people you know, and will be incorporated in the company's network by hiring you.

      Again, how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job?

      And if the answer is "it doesn't, but they might want to know anyway" - why isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

      Are you thinking it's all a popularity contest, as in how many Friends you have on Facebook? That's a pretty shallow way to look at something more sophisticated like linkedin.

      I don't do any of this stuff either; I'm here to find out if maybe I should. I'm not expecting linkedin to be a facebook clone, but it appears you are.

      Seems a bit too judgemental on your part.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    47. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all well and good to view work as the things we can personally accomplish, but only you and the people you've worked with can make an accurate assessment of that. Someone looking to hire you won't know this. The interview process is one important step, but getting peer reviews from colleagues you've worked with in the past can also help to fill in that information.

      During our most recent hiring phase, about 1/3 of the applicants that we interviewed had prior work experience with someone I had personally worked with. The person we hired had previously worked with someone who's opinion I greatly respect. The positive review I got from my former colleague played a significant role in our hiring decision. There were other candidates we talked to who were qualified, but the personal review made our choice a safer bet. And it didn't simply have to do with the fact that he knew my former colleague, it had to do with the fact that he had impressed my former colleague with what he was personally able to accomplish.

      Without LinkedIn, I would not have been able to see the mutual connections between myself and the job applicants. For me, LinkedIn is less about who you know and more about who you know that can vouch for what you can personally accomplish.

    48. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by PPH · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to recruit people by going through people you already know.

      OK, so ask them for recommendations. That's one dysfunctional 'family' you've got there if you have to pick their brains by going on line.

      Offer a decent incentive ($50 or something).

      So, you'd recommend a friend for a position for $50. But not because you respect his/her professional reputation or you think it would be a benefit for your company.

      When it comes down to it, a lot of people will try to bring in someone they know they can trust because they know their reputation is on the line too.

      True. If you have to vouch for them personally. But I have no idea how easy it is for people to link to your Facebook or Linkedin page as a friend or professional contact. That lends a certain amount of deniability to the transaction. "Gee, boss. I don't know how Homer Simpson got on my buddy list. Don't tell me you actually hired the bum!"

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    49. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

      Coming from an IT background, we view work as something which we can personally accomplish. It's what we know and how we apply it which is important.

      And frankly, that view of work as something which "we can personally accomplish" is outdated and does not scale in any company larger than a hundred or so people, maybe even less.

      And that's the kind of MBA-babble that brought us such titans of industry as GE or BofA, which we are all collectively bailing out because they "scaled" to the point that nobody could "personally accomplish" figuring out how they worked. You're right, pushing things like "skills" doesn't scale very far because it's hard work, and requires people to really understand what the people working for them do. That's a good thing.

    50. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Americano · · Score: 1

      If you really mean to make the ludicrous suggestion that a single person can administer the entire IT infrastructure of a moderate-to-large sized company without ever dealing with another person, you're an idiot.

      It's not MBA-babble, it's an acknowledgement of the reality that NO person (in IT or elsewhere) can "do it all," and must be able to interact with other people if they're going to be worth their paycheck.

      Learn reading comprehension.

    51. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

      Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

      Because getting a job has almost nothing to do with how well you can do said job, and almost everything to do with whom you know.

      isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

      ...which is why you should be very picky about your connections on LinkedIn. There are several on LinkedIn with whom I shall not connect.

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    52. Re:Want a job? Get on LinkedIn by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      That's one dysfunctional 'family' you've got there if you have to pick their brains by going on line.

      Uh what? You're being overly cynical here. What's dysfunctional about using a method where it's easier to see who is who and what their qualifications are, based off of who you know? Instead of having your buddy rattle of a list of names and their qualifications, this is being done for you.

      So, you'd recommend a friend for a position for $50. But not because you respect his/her professional reputation or you think it would be a benefit for your company.

      Sure, I'd recommend a friend for a position for $50. Wouldn't you? It's easy money.

      It's not always the case of having respect for you friends professional reputation or them being a benefit for the company. You may not necessarily know that they're hiring, or you know, but it may have never occurred to you until something jogged your brain.

      Now I personally haven't used LinkedIn either, but I doubt it would be a stretch to assume that you just can't willy nilly add someone to your friends list and have it be a two way street automatically. All of the social networking schemes I've ever used have necessitated a need for both parties to agree. Why would LinkedIn be any different?

  3. You can't win if you don't play by salesgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole social network phenomenon is a lot like the lottery:

    * You can't win if you don't play.
    * You can't loose if you don't play.

    The price of admission to the social network game is:

    * Loss of privacy.
    * You may meet new people. Some may be good and others may be bad.
    * Get a new free email account because harvesting emails out of social networks is the new hotness for small time spamtrepreneurs.

    It's a lot like real life. The more friends you have the less private life is, and the more people want you to sign up for their MLM.

    --
    -- $G
    1. Re:You can't win if you don't play by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      ^^ Comment of the month.

    2. Re:You can't win if you don't play by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, but most of these "friends" aren't real. It's like facebook where you can have 100s of so-called friends but none of them would actually do anything for you. What use is that? It's like the late-90s/early-00s internet bubble, where instead of companies trying to grow marketshare but having no viable business plan, you have people trying to be popular but with real viable end goal for it all.

      Social networking to meet new people is great, but as far as networking goes, the more people that are in it, the less each individual is worth. I would think you're almost better using social media to meet new people, but having fewer but true friends and some contacts around the industry that know your potential value to a business from real contact rather than just another face online hyping him/herself.

    3. Re:You can't win if you don't play by dintlu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As sites like LinkedIn grow in popularity, and as users learn to game the system to their advantage, I expect that the value of such services for hiring decisions will be diminished to the point where actual word of mouth matters as much as it did before the existence of the service.

    4. Re:You can't win if you don't play by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. I have avoided Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. like the plague for various reasons, one being that in the long run I don't think it will actually do me any good. I get jobs effortlessly enough as it is ;)

    5. Re:You can't win if you don't play by ickpoo · · Score: 1

      Think of LinkedIn as a glorified address book and it is still useful. Just ensure that all your friends are really people you know.

      --
      I am not a script! .Sig?
    6. Re:You can't win if you don't play by dintlu · · Score: 1

      This is a naive way of looking at a social networking service. People are going to pursue the behavior that results in their getting the best jobs.

    7. Re:You can't win if you don't play by mh1997 · · Score: 5, Funny

      * You can't loose if you don't play.

      What can't you loosen if you don't play? I can see a scenario where you can't lose if you don't play.

      For what it's worth, I've never hired a person because of a facebook profile, but I have not hired plenty of people because of facebook profiles.

    8. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole social network phenomenon is a lot like the lottery:

      * You can't win if you don't play.
      * You can't loose if you don't play.

      * You can't spell if you post to Slashdot, apparently.

    9. Re:You can't win if you don't play by poena.dare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I chose LinkedIn to be my employment oriented networking site because nobody there cares what half-assed band you like.

    10. Re:You can't win if you don't play by speedtux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For what it's worth, I've never hired a person because of a facebook profile, but I have not hired plenty of people because of facebook profiles.

      Contrary to what you seem to think, the employer/employee relationship goes both ways, and finding and keeping good employees is just as important for you as finding a good job is for them.

      So, if you decide based on my Facebook page that we aren't going to get along, it's better for both of us to find that out before you hire me.

      On the other hand, if you don't have a decent and convincing online presence yourself, I may not even consider you, and you'll never know.

    11. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you're using facebook as a means to get a job, you're doing it wrong.

    12. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And here comes the trolls screaming and yelling, "BUT HOW DO YOU KNOW IT WASNT A FAKE PROFILE DONE IN MALICE???????/!!!!11111aoneoneoneololoowerhowweor" And I'm sure you'll be respond with, "they seemed shady during the interview, I just wanted to do a further check." or something to that extent.

    13. Re:You can't win if you don't play by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I would agree - but my comments apply to LinkedIn as well (I did mention LinkedIn, after all). I don't have any social networking site accounts, so I guess I'm not doing it wrong either way ;)

    14. Re:You can't win if you don't play by adrianmsmith · · Score: 1

      Most people in Germany and the surrounding area use Xing.

    15. Re:You can't win if you don't play by BridgeBum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I actually only recently got a Facebook account, and it was 100% due to work. My company is using Facebook to share things like pictures, videos, etc. (non-proprietary) with the employees.

      Just one anecdotal comment of course, but just trying to point out that Facebook is becoming more than just social networking.

      Full disclosure: I've been on LinkedIn for a while, it's only Facebook that is new to me. I have never been on myspace.

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
    16. Re:You can't win if you don't play by ady1 · · Score: 1

      So you never hired anyone in general. Really informative... Good job mods

    17. Re:You can't win if you don't play by dbIII · · Score: 0, Troll

      To add to that, LinkedIn is about the only real site worth doing for your career.

      Are you sure? It's full of losers like the idiot that couldn't find the White House emails (who now runs a computer security firm!) and the idiot that wrote that terrorists could use coal ash to build nukes.

    18. Re:You can't win if you don't play by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      * You can't spell if you post to Slashdot, apparently.

      Eye kin two!

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    19. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but most of these "friends" aren't real.

      No! They are real, you're just saying that to hurt me!

    20. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1

      If my company ever makes enough money to hire someone, I would never ever hire someone who isn't at least on Facebook and with loads of drunk-ass photos on their profile.

      Then I'm developing and running social networking sites, so I guess it's a little different... If you're applying to a job in the secret service or mafia, I guess you want to be secret.

    21. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      I can understand in certain situations, but really, I have to question the deep wisdom of it.

      If you look at my facebook profile you'll see plenty of pictures of me drinking, burning things, smashing things, in various awful outfits; I would guess these are things that one would consider not giving me a job for because I'm a drunken destructive weirdo. However, I'm also a consummate professional with nothing but praise from employers and coworkers. What I do on my time is my business, and given that I very rarely interact directly with customers I somehow doubt that what I do in my personal life is ever going to affect anyones bottom line.

    22. Re:You can't win if you don't play by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>because nobody there cares what half-assed band you like.

      And if they do care, it is likely that they will care in a negative way. Not everyone thinks that the weirdo imagery of today's bands and album covers is cool..

      Even as a big music fan myyself I can see how some conservative person could be offended by a Heavy Metal or a Rap album cover or musician's/band's name.

      --
      Huh?
    23. Re:You can't win if you don't play by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but most of these "friends" aren't real. It's like facebook where you can have 100s of so-called friends but none of them would actually do anything for you. What use is that?

      I think that speaks more to the quality of your Facebook friends (or your perception of Facebook friends) than anything else.
      I would be perfectly comfortable asking favors of almost anyone I have as a Facebook friend.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    24. Re:You can't win if you don't play by beav007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      and the idiot that wrote that terrorists could use coal ash to build nukes.

      You've got to have something to draw your plans with...

    25. Re:You can't win if you don't play by SkyDude · · Score: 1
      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    26. Re:You can't win if you don't play by pgaffney · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is just not true. I'm actively using social networking and local bbs's to get me + wife into the local social scene. We're both from out of town and we've moved to a place with very small tight groups of friends who have typically grown up together and are a little nervous about outsiders. It's not a good environment for walking up to people in bars and introducing yourself, but these sites allow you to start goofing around with people anonymously, which then makes them more interested and curious about you when you meet them IRL.

    27. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think there are some fundamental differences between LinkedIn and the likes of Facebook, which is why I'm happy to be listed on the one but not the others.

      In particular, LinkedIn has access only to professional information about me that I would typically share with a prospective client/employer anyway, and it only collects that information from me personally apart from the basic networking information that is the whole point (and is only collected/reliable with my confirmation anyway).

      Facebook, in sharp contrast, got almost no information from me personally when I briefly signed up, yet practically had my whole life story within a couple of days because their entire MO is to get friends to volunteer information about each other. Moreover, the information that Facebook attempts to collect is often very personal and certainly not the sort of thing I would voluntarily share on-line.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    28. Re:You can't win if you don't play by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While there is truth in what you are saying, control constantly shifts between employe[e/r] in the game. For small companies, you will never be able to out-shine the "big guys". That doesn't make the pay or opportunity less, but it changes the advertising dynamics.

      As for facebook profiles, it is hard to look at a potential candidate puking up a lung and take them serious. When you hire someone, it is hard to weigh sources of information, given the limited and controlled environment of an interview.

    29. Re:You can't win if you don't play by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      You forgot *waste of time as one of your options. I really don't have time for social networking, and I don't hire or have never been hired based on my social network. I doubt most human resources directors care, for that matter.

    30. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a member of LinkedIn, but it seems the purpose is not to create friends, but show who they know, just like other social sites. Instead of pretending they're friends, LinkedIn just promotes the idea of professional links.

      Who you know matters, and posting that information for all to search and see could mean you get called for an interview. Or not. YMMV. Etc.

    31. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Except it's really hard to lose with LinkedIn, since it has a tight focus and good anonymity rules.

    32. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * You can't loose if you don't play.

      And apparently yoou can't spell if you doon't play, either. Dammit, peoople, it's noot hard!

      Doo yoou "tie a nose", and "blow your noose"?

      I doon't think soo.

      It's time to lose your casual acceptance loose spelling,
      or I shall loose a horde of losers upon you.

    33. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      I only got a Facebook account so I could keep an eye on my daughter's page.

      I got a LinkedIn account 6 years ago when I was laid off. I've gotten a few job leads from it.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    34. Re:You can't win if you don't play by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I was marked troll for some reason, however my point is that a lot of people with highly inflated opinions of themselves have well padded LinkedIn entries. Along with all the real entries you have every pointy haired Poindexter which dilutes the effectiveness of it and should render it useless to HR - since it's self regulating the best liar wins.

      An interesting exercise is to get the name of some miscreant from a news story (eg. the person who couldn't find the White House emails for three years despite being in charge of them) and look them up on LinkedIn and wonder what in their career history warranted each spectacular rise in position. The site appears to be paticularly popular with the political appointees of the last few years.

    35. Re:You can't win if you don't play by number11 · · Score: 1

      Along with all the real entries you have every pointy haired Poindexter which dilutes the effectiveness of it and should render it useless to HR - since it's self regulating the best liar wins.

      I can see you haven't met the folks in HR.

    36. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for facebook profiles, it is hard to look at a potential candidate puking up a lung and take them serious. When you hire someone, it is hard to weigh sources of information, given the limited and controlled environment of an interview.

      Well, my Facebook profile is professional, but I am a member of groups that support free speech, the separation of church and state, and civil liberties. That probably offends many fundamentalists, but it's better to get that out of the way beforehand.

    37. Re:You can't win if you don't play by svunt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've turned down jobs because of the employer's or my new superior's facebook profile. A few months back Irefused a job after seeing the CEO was in groups like:
      "If you don't love the Australian flag then GET THE FUCK OUT"
      "I love Bundaberg Rum"
      "I tried to watch Transformers and all I saw was Megan Fox"
      I'm an open-minded, relatively intelligent guy, and despite the nearly 20% salary increase the job was worth, not a chance. So yeah, facebook works both ways.

    38. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only got a Facebook account so I could keep an eye on my daughter's page

      Thats so funny, I only got a Facebook account so I could keep an eye on your daughter's page too.

      Yummy.

    39. Re:You can't win if you don't play by xristoph · · Score: 1

      that is exactly the kind of attitude that makes people employ those shiny half-wits that are good enough at impressing you on the interview, and do not have an online presence to speak of. And that are being let go after a while because they just don't get the job done.

      while i do not have those drunk pics online, i believe that whatever somebody does in his free time is his own business. and that anybody who does not have fun during his studies misses the whole point of it ^o^

    40. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what you seem to think, the employer/employee relationship goes both ways, and finding and keeping good employees is just as important for you as finding a good job is for them.

      Right. So, do you think this guy wants to work for a company that doesn't show up on a Google search? That's unlisted? I strongly believe in privacy, but hiding from the world isn't good for business.

    41. Re:You can't win if you don't play by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but most of these "friends" aren't real.
      Certainly all of MY contacts (they're not all friends) are real. I have never attempted to contact someone whom I have not worked with, am related to, or have socialized with outside of the internet. This is not like Myspace where people are friending back and forth just to bump up the number of supposed friends they have. Linkedin tells you specifically NOT to send invites to people you don't know.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    42. Re:You can't win if you don't play by tompaulco · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if you don't have a decent and convincing online presence yourself, I may not even consider you, and you'll never know.
      Wow, I guess it depends on what you are hiring for, but as a manager myself, I wouldn't deduct any points for NOT having an online presence, and in fact, the candidate would probably lose credibility with me if they DID have a myspace account. Linkedin and Plaxo, I am completely neutral about. Facebook is less negative than myspace to me.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    43. Re:You can't win if you don't play by oliphaunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not so much a question of whether we'll get along as it is a question of whether you'll embarrass me in front of a client. You taking bong hits in a FB pic implies that you have questionable judgment and you don't care who knows it.

      Not saying that i've seen that pic of you. Just a for-example.

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    44. Re:You can't win if you don't play by mgblst · · Score: 3, Funny

      to get me + wife into the local swingers scene

      There, fixed that for you.

      But seriously, I usually do this through work mates, when I move to a new area, but my last position the workers were all stuck (not IT people), so I also relied on my facebook contacts.

    45. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I can't see how a boss's personal site would make me want to consider working for them.

      I can see it doing the opposite - if you find out a potential manager spends his free time hanging out with a roadie name Cocaine Dave and blogs about the white supremacy movement, then yeah, maybe you'll skip that interview. On the other hand, if their site is a well-polished advert, showing how well they get along with their employees and the awards they've won, I'm going to think it's there specifically to lure applicants. And if it's filled with regular, personal info, I'm not going to care because as great as it is to make friends at work, I'm there to make money first.

      Maybe it's just the industry I work in, or maybe I'm not understanding your post correctly, but I think it's insane to pass on a potential job because somebody doesn't have a personal site you can peep at.

    46. Re:You can't win if you don't play by MasterOfCeremonies · · Score: 1

      How were you able to see a potential employee's Facebook profile without already being friends with them?

    47. Re:You can't win if you don't play by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 3, Funny

      We don't use IRL, we say AFK.

    48. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only requests I have ever received from LinkedIn were from people trying to sell me their over priced consulting services. More importantly it always seems to be people trying to sell the non technical staff members consulting services. While LinkedIn may have been good for finding jobs at one point, I would say it's already dead for anyone that doesn't want to deal with spam.

    49. Re:You can't win if you don't play by pamar · · Score: 1

      I do agree that LinkedIn is the best choice for a professional "net".

      And yes, in Europe Xing may have its merits, too.

      Forget about most of the rest (viadeo, etc.) and stay away from Facebook and the other "hobby/friends" network. Or better yet, don't stay away if you want to take part in that, but be careful not to mix the two aspects.

    50. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you're just devoid of any sense of humour whatsoever, and this shortcoming cost you a 20% pay rise?

    51. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How were you able to see a potential employee's Facebook profile without already being friends with them?

      Depends on the Facebook account's privacy settings. It is possible to allow non-friends to view your profile, and some people actually do so.

      It's also possible to view photos in which friends of friends have been tagged, via albums of friends, or via albums containing photos in which your friends have been tagged.

      I don't friend people with whom I've no real-life relationship (about a quarter of my FB friends are actually colleagues with whom I've worked for years but never actually met F2F), I don't let non-friends view my profile, and I don't post stuff that I don't want other people to see. Otherwise I don't worry about it too much.

    52. Re:You can't win if you don't play by ronchx · · Score: 1

      I have been on myspace for years with over 1500 faux friends. It's completely useless except for the dating upside since I decided to add several local members of the opposite sex. I stopped using it about a year ago.

      Recently, however I joined facebook and decided I would actually only add people I know personally or friends of theirs who have a reason for being added like some interest or hobby we may have in common. This has proven very beneficial for a variety of reasons especially my personal advancement. Here is my take on all of it.

      1) I do not care if the public knows I exist, in fact, I cant see a downside to it. (play nice you witty people who might feel the need to show me a downside!) I will be attending a seminar next week on marketing yourself and creating a public image to increase your personal value. That works for everyone from plumbers to producers to ubergeeks. Only good has ever come from it. I have done side gigs for the businesses or employers of many of my friends who always go to bat for me. I can broadcast my desire for a position to friends who may or may not be able to help me, but odds are always better when you try to reach out to 100 people on a networking site even if they aren't in your field, than reaching out to 0.

      2) Use a gmail account if you are worried about spam. Simple and effective.

      3) Do not go out with the weird guy with the van who contacts you and asks you to meet him in the park or a dark alley if you are worried about bad people! What BAD people???? You choose who you add so if there is a reason for networking with them, what's the risk? They might send you a scary photo? If your boss finds you and sees your friends and judges you, you are better off getting a paper route or becoming a telemarketer than working for an idiot like that.

      4) Do not put your home address and social security information on your profile. LOL! What loss of privacy? Did you do bad things to people in your past who might be looking for you by your real name? If not, I fail to see the problem. If you are afraid karma is going to come back and bite you for something you have done, that's a different story and it's coming either way so let's hope you're a good person ;)

    53. Re:You can't win if you don't play by houghi · · Score: 1

      Most things you say balance out. So all I need to do is turn in my privacy for no apparent reason. No wonder I decline all invitations.

      Also remember that once you are on there, you can never get out of it again. Things you are proud of now might embarrass you in 10 years, no matter how normal they are now.

      Keep your privacy or at least defend it as much as possible.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    54. Re:You can't win if you don't play by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I can't see how a boss's personal site would make me want to consider working for them.

      I can see it doing the opposite - if you find out a potential manager spends his free time hanging out with a roadie name Cocaine Dave and blogs about the white supremacy movement, then yeah, maybe you'll skip that interview. On the other hand, if their site is a well-polished advert, showing how well they get along with their employees and the awards they've won, I'm going to think it's there specifically to lure applicants. And if it's filled with regular, personal info, I'm not going to care because as great as it is to make friends at work, I'm there to make money first.

      Maybe it's just the industry I work in, or maybe I'm not understanding your post correctly, but I think it's insane to pass on a potential job because somebody doesn't have a personal site you can peep at.

      Excellent point! This is exactly what I was thinking about, word for word.

      But I work in academia, and perhaps our criteria are different than the ones of the GP, who might be workng in the entertainment industry.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    55. Re:You can't win if you don't play by daveime · · Score: 1

      IRL = In Real Life !

      Example, I'd maybe say "She's my daughter in IRL", as I often play MMORPGs online together with my kids. I'd never say "She's my daughter AFK" ... She's my daughter when I'm away from the keyboard ? What kind of sense does that statement have ?

      AFK = I'm going for a piss, be back in 5 minutes, don't kill that dragon without me etc.

      At least, that's the context I've always associated with them.

      YMMV.

    56. Re:You can't win if you don't play by daveime · · Score: 1

      Netiquette Nazis, please lower your bayonets. I know I said "in IRL", and yes I DO know it's redundant.

    57. Re:You can't win if you don't play by jtogel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I respectfully disagree. As an academic, I use Facebook as my main professional networking tool. This is for the simple reason that people actually check their FB accounts on a daily basis, whereas nobody ever logs in to Linkedin except to accept or decline a new connection request.

    58. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I only got a fake facebook account so my dad thinks he can keep track of me and this weirdo can stalk me in a harmless way...

    59. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      "Contrary to what you seem to think, the employer/employee relationship goes both ways, and finding and keeping good employees is just as important for you as finding a good job is for them."

      No offence but the world is in recession. Nice one dickhead. Finally the attitude that there are employers begging for people to work is gone!

      YAY FOR THE REAL WORLD AGAIN!

      (Oh and thanks for the US banking system for fucking up the world...wankers)

      * dickhead is a soft term where I come from

    60. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I think the main reason Facebook is (allegedly) harmful is because of some publisized cases where some idiot or his friends showed pictures of their drunken binges. As long as you (or your friends) aren't idiots, Facebook shouldn't be harmful.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    61. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the third hand, in this economy, you'll come crawling to eat the poo out of his butt for 5$ an hour

    62. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, I've never hired a person because of a facebook profile, but I have not hired plenty of people because of facebook profiles.

      Tell me this, then...

      You say you've not hired plenty of people because of facebook profiles.

      Do you refuse to hire every and any potential employee that has a facebook profile?

      I didn't think so.

      So you're essentially twisting words. Really, you are using Facebook as a screening tool. The people you see on there that you choose not to hire suck, and the rest that you find on there suck less. Plus you have more information about whether or not they suck than your average non-Facebook user.

      Mince words if you like, pretend you don't play the game, but we see through you like clear glass on a hot summers day ;) Remind me not to tell you my Facebook, k?

    63. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Phoenixhawk · · Score: 1

      Privacy settings, unless you lock it down, I believe their open by default.

    64. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can tell from Internet searches, there are three people in the world who share my first and last name. One of them has a Facebook page with a picture that would, shall we say, cast doubt on the credibility of the person. I made myself a Facebook page with the privacy settings turned to the max. The page is there so that if anyone searches, they won't jump to the conclusion that the profile with the picture is mine.

    65. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 2, Funny

      "As far as networking goes, the more people that are in it, the less each individual is worth."

      I think you've just defined a new corollary to Metcalf's Law.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    66. Re:You can't win if you don't play by N1AK · · Score: 1

      The OP was quoting from TPB's trial where the prosecutor used the acronym IRL during proceedings and the defendant said that they would use AFK.

    67. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP was quoting from TPB's trial where the prosecutor used the acronym IRL during proceedings and the defendant said that they would use AFK.

      WTF?

    68. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should probably also join a group which supports stereotyping and painting with an overly broad brush. Douche.

    69. Re:You can't win if you don't play by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      No offence but the world is in recession. Nice one dickhead. Finally the attitude that there are employers begging for people to work is gone!

      Good luck to the employers trying to sell goods and services to a bunch of unemployed people. The recession hurts everyone, and if anything it will cause a rise in union membership and new labor laws if only to ensure that people are employed at sufficient wages to buy things.

    70. Re:You can't win if you don't play by fava · · Score: 1

      Every population is bound to have some idiots, the larger the population the more idiots there will be. But since idiots attract more attention then average the whole population gets tainted. To make it worse many idiots are so sure of their genius that they actively try to promote their idiocy.

      Remember half the population is below average.

    71. Re:You can't win if you don't play by joeyblades · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Be discretionary. Don't invite people to link with you or accepts invitations from others if you don't know and respect them. Don't endorse people unless you personally would jump through hoops to hire them yourself. LinkedIn can be either a great tool or a social networking farce - you can control which way you want it to go.

    72. Re:You can't win if you don't play by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      You're right, and I agree, but the exact phrase the GP used appeared in the defense for The Pirate Bay story the other day.

      I looked at it cross-eyed the other day too.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    73. Re:You can't win if you don't play by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but most of these "friends" aren't real. It's like facebook where you can have 100s of so-called friends but none of them would actually do anything for you. What use is that?

      This is only true if you foolishly add everyone you can to your friends list. I only add people I actually know and at least marginally care about. Social networks aren't popularity contests. They're tools, and if used wisely, can be very effective in augmenting other forms of communication.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    74. Re:You can't win if you don't play by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      One of the joys of Facebook and other social networking sites is finding out that people can or can't spell or use basic grammar correctly.

      Yes to all you anti-grammerites, it matters to me if you speak to one of my customers and they decide we're all uneducated buffoons.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    75. Re:You can't win if you don't play by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      It doesn't offend any intelligent fundamentalists at all unless you can't figure out how those have nothing to do with your job as a programmer.

      I care less what you believe and more whether you think it should matter to the rest of us at work.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    76. Re:You can't win if you don't play by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Meh, if HR doesn't like that i dig cannibal corpse, f 'em. /sarcasm

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    77. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ding ding ding! we have a winner

    78. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't hire anyone that can't spell lose!

    79. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You taking bong hits in a FB pic implies that you have questionable judgment and you don't care who knows it.

      Yes, look how badly it's hurt Michael Phelps....

    80. Re:You can't win if you don't play by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I think that speaks more to the quality of your Facebook friends (or your perception of Facebook friends) than anything else. I would be perfectly comfortable asking favors of almost anyone I have as a Facebook friend.

      I agree. For instance, if you really want to focus on the quality of your network, you should avoid accepting invitations from people you don't know (or can't remember). On face book, those usually are cute girls two thousand miles away that I couldn't possibly know. And on linkedin, those usually are recruiters with 500+ contacts already that I don't know and I really couldn't care to know either.

    81. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, I've never hired a person because of a facebook profile, but I have not hired plenty of people because of facebook profiles.

      But unless you are a friend you can't access anything except their name and main picture can you? So was the judgement based on that, or did you become friends with them on facebook first?

    82. Re:You can't win if you don't play by pfleming · · Score: 1

      Facebook, in sharp contrast, got almost no information from me personally when I briefly signed up, yet practically had my whole life story within a couple of days because their entire MO is to get friends to volunteer information about each other. Moreover, the information that Facebook attempts to collect is often very personal and certainly not the sort of thing I would voluntarily share on-line.

      I find this interesting and appalling at the same time. But I guess that's the nature of the social sites, bring as much dirt as you can.

    83. Re:You can't win if you don't play by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      I'm an open-minded, relatively intelligent guy...

      Yet you turned down a 20% pay increase because your prospective boss likes to have a laugh? Or was it that your taste in flags, spirits and actresses varied so wildly from his that your differences were irreconcilable? Sure, this guy doesn't sound like a great intellectual (or someone that I'd like to spend a lot of time with) but he'd be your employer, not your new best buddy.

      More to the point perhaps, why did this guy let you add him on Facebook? People I know add only their friends, and to my understanding that's the whole idea. If I was to receive a friend invite from a random stranger, I would decline it without a second thought.

    84. Re:You can't win if you don't play by svunt · · Score: 1

      He, like a lot of idiots, has a completely public fb profile. And, to address your questions and the comment above, I care a lot more about not having to do the bidding of a small-minded fuckwit than I do about a raise I don't need. Flag-based patriotism is something I find frankly intolerable, and people who are fans of rum brands, well there's a difference between drinking Jim Beam on weekends and having a poster of the guy on your wall, y'know?

    85. Re:You can't win if you don't play by MasterOfCeremonies · · Score: 1

      By default your profile is visible to your friends only. There is an option to extend this to "friends of friends" but there is no "show to everyone" privacy option. This is why I don't understand this claim that recruiters can check out your Facebook page, unless they happen to be on your friends list, in which case they probably know you anyway, so won't be needing this info in the first place.

      If you're not friends [of friends] with someone, then all you can see is their profile picture, their name and their list of friends. So unless your profile pic is particularly embarassing / unprofessional then you have little to worry about with respect to what you're making available to random people, such as recruiters.

    86. Re:You can't win if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the information on LinkedIn is crap - every useless, untalented worked just gets their useless, untalented friends to write glowing references for them.

      I don't know of any employers or recruitment agencies who actually look at LinkedIn at all, or give it any credit whatsoever.

  4. Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only site I use is LinkedIn, because it is a good way to keep a thin attachment to people who are just contacts, but people I don't want to loose touch with entirely. That to me is far different than telling people misc details about my life that I consider to be private.

    1. Re:Degree by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      LinkedIn is great because Kevin Bacon is on it and you can see how many degrees removed from him you are. He has "500+ connections" on LinkedIn. I'm only 3 degrees away myself and I'm not even in the entertainment industry.

    2. Re:Degree by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's a good point. And it brings up another aspect of these web communities: Companies hire people for both what they know and who they know. The latter is often exploited by marginally ompetent people looking to latch onto someone else's coattails.

      I'm already known in my professional community. So there are a lot of people trying to find details about me, like my wife's/kids'/dog's names so that they can go into an interview and BS people into thinking that we're the best of buddies.

      As an employer, I don't place much weight on these sorts of resources because they are easily manipuated. And as an employee I wouldn't want to work for an outfit that placed too much emphasis on social networks. Its an engineering firm, not a frat house.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Degree by turbotroll · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only site I use is LinkedIn, because it is a good way to keep a thin attachment to people who are just contacts, but people I don't want to loose touch with entirely. That to me is far different than telling people misc details about my life that I consider to be private.

      I share your opinion. Although I am very negative towards the very idea of social networking as such, I still find LinkedIn to be acceptable because it is professionally oriented (unlike Facebook and others). I primarily use it as a job seeking tool and use to receive some offers from time to time.

    4. Re:Degree by happyslayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      because it is a good way to keep a thin attachment to people who are just contacts, but people I don't want to loose touch with entirely.

      That's one of the best reasons to be on it. I started using LinkedIn (free, not paying!) to get in touch with old colleagues; that's it, nothing more. Recommendations and invitations are for only people I absolutely know (I reject any others out of hand.)

      For any social networking sites, it's the Thermodynamics of Humanity--crap and chaos will increase. AOL, Yahoo Message boards (social, financial, etc.), the garbage always builds up.

      On that note, are only a few places I still follow that have stayed "fairly" clean. Joke as much as you want, but Slashdot has stayed pretty close to mission over the years. Groklaw is still pretty good. Motley Fool is still fairly new, but has hung on to it's central theme for a couple of years now.

      Think of social networking sites like sex, or dating: Before you sign up, imagine that some Glenn Close nutjob is going to hunt you down and kill your pets, or some pimply teenager is going to show up on your door step 16 years from now at the family reunion shouting, "Dad! Mama tol' me you owed us for that fling all those years ago!"

      If those kinds of problems are foreseeable, don't use the sites.

      --
      Never confuse movement with action. --Hemingway
    5. Re:Degree by rs79 · · Score: 1

      With photoshop I'm zero degrees away from Kevin Bacon.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    6. Re:Degree by kopo · · Score: 1

      Actually, on LinkedIn, there seem to be many Independent Entertainment Professionals who are 0 degrees away from Kevin Bacon. By giving yourself a creative name (e.g. "Kevin Bacon"), you can be one of them, too.

    7. Re:Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the heck is Kevin Bacon?

    8. Re:Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a looser.

    9. Re:Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked with link analysis (the formal name for social networking) before it was cool, I am extremely reluctant to put anything on the 'net.

      That said, I do use LinkedIn, if only for the business relationships. I place only that which is necessary (say, for former co-worker/employee recommendations) on it, and use a throw-away e-mail address. I won't use any other social networking system.

      It's a helpful tool, but unless used wisely, can backfire on you.

    10. Re:Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's the guy with the most connections on LinkedIn.

    11. Re:Degree by Deagol · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's the dude who bags flour at Lehi Mills, 30 minutes south of Salt Lake City.

    12. Re:Degree by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Who the heck is Kevin Bacon?

      An actor. See The Oracle of Bacon, which draws connections (through movies they've been in) between Kevin Bacon and any other actor you can think of.

      A person's "Bacon Number" indicates how many steps away from Kevin Bacon they are, for example someone who has been in a movie with Kevin Bacon has a Bacon Number of 1, while someone who has been in a movie with someone else who's been in a movie with Kevin Bacon has a Bacon Number of 2. It's not easy to think of an actor whose Bacon Number is higher than three.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    13. Re:Degree by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      When you say that Motley Fool is "still fairly new", what do you mean precisely? I remember signing up back in about 1998, when I was a foolish schoolchild and actually gave them real data. I then got physical junk mail from people wanting to help me manage my portfolio (but only taking clients who were prepared to invest at least 100.000 dollars).

    14. Re:Degree by robogobo · · Score: 0

      Why can't anyone spell "lose"!

    15. Re:Degree by happyslayer · · Score: 1

      The link in my OP is to their CAPS site--an investment "game" where you can rate whether a company is going to outperform or underperform the market. It also has space for blogs, comments, opinions, etc...plus the usual articles.

      I should have been more specific in my post--you're correct, the Fool has been around for a lot longer than that.

      --
      Never confuse movement with action. --Hemingway
    16. Re:Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting (I am the original AC).

      Now based on some pictures, I can see my initial cluelessness there, but it still puzzless me why the name didn't ring any bell.

      I mean, even if the OP used something like "Dolph Lundgren" as a prime LinkedIn example, even in Slashdot context, I'd be quickly able to realize the "yeah, the actor of course". But for some reason, even with Bacon's picture, the only thing that comes to mind is "oh, it's THAT support I've seen in tons of movies!" And I probably wouldn't be able to name three of them where I'm really positive he starred (but then, the same goes for Lundgren).

      Anyway, thanks for clarification and for the link, some numbers there are quite amusing..

    17. Re:Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like fucked company's deadpool game, only not nearly as funny. Too bad pud went legit and doesn't let us amuse ourselves about other's misfortunes.

    18. Re:Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try MJR's Credible Service also. It is good.

    19. Re:Degree by kdp007 · · Score: 1

      Same here. LinkedIn is primarily for coworkers and former coworkers, and you only put in as much data as you want. When you're looking for a job, it doesn't hurt to have contacts.

      --
      Gun control: all the rounds in the X-ring.
    20. Re:Degree by kabocox · · Score: 1

      LinkedIn is great because Kevin Bacon is on it and you can see how many degrees removed from him you are. He has "500+ connections" on LinkedIn. I'm only 3 degrees away myself and I'm not even in the entertainment industry.

      Shouldn't we play that with Bill Gates or Linus Torvalds being slashdot and all? How many connections do they have?

  5. Questionable advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I am a very private and cautious person also when it comes to giving out personal information. I really doubt that your giving any personal information would actually bring in any substantial business and you would be best served by continuing to protect your identity.

    1. Re:Questionable advantage by masdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It depends on how you use the sites and what you put on your profile. I have a lot of detail on my Facebook profile, but the only people who can see that information are the people on my friends list. My LinkedIn profile, which is geared for a more professional atmosphere, contains parts of my resume and my previous work history because I use it as a professional networking tool.

      Facebook has really fine-grained privacy controls that allows you to restrict who in your networks can see your profile, what they can see, and when they can see it. You can even go as far as adding "friends" to limited profile lists that restricts what they can see or blocking them outright.

    2. Re:Questionable advantage by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...the only people who can see that information are the people on my friends list.

      So can anybody with a subpoena. Or even without one nowadays.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Questionable advantage by differentialman · · Score: 1

      Though, if they have a subpoena, chances are they can get to much more private stuff than what's on your facebook. What kind of subpoena-worthy stuff do you keep on facebook, anyway?

    4. Re:Questionable advantage by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I'd say on average underage drinking and drug use is the bulk of subpoena worthy stuff on fb.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  6. no offense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...but I am surprised you are an IT admin and unaware of how both social and professional networking websites actually work. About the only thing strangers can see is your name.

    Why are you afraid to put honest professional information out there? Nothing says you have to post everything about you. My profiles on social websites is very controlled and only portrays what I want. The basic rule, for me, is to keep my professional and business aspects of my life separate.

    Lastly, I use my name for professional networking and a variation of my name for social. So, if a potential client e-stalks me with "Ruthered B. Hayes" they will never get the social sites I have under "R. Brenticus Hayes"

    Bottom line, you control your image, be careful with it, but do not be afraid.

    1. Re:no offense.. by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Lastly, I use my name for professional networking and a variation of my name for social. So, if a potential client e-stalks me with "Ruthered B. Hayes" they will never get the social sites I have under "R. Brenticus Hayes"

      Unless they see this post as well.

    2. Re:no offense.. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly why I have considered making a hundred fake personas so that I can show that I am 'LinkedIn'. This would give perspective employers the ability to see that I had hundreds of satisfied clients who are undyingly loyal to me, and that back me up when I claim to have invented the internet, automobile, and the light bulb.

    3. Re:no offense.. by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Huh? LinkedIn makes no secret of the fact that they sell "premium" accounts which can see the full details of anyone, whether they are in your network or not. The result of this is that if you're even remotely worth hiring you will be nagged by head hunters day and night. This is why I kindly requested LinkedIn to take my info off their stupid site.. it took 3 strongly worded emails, but they did.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:no offense.. by Moxon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Should have tried a nicely worded one instead. That worked in one go for me.

    5. Re:no offense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, there's no point clicking the 'Anonymous Coward' button if you're going to put your name in the post.

      Yours sincerely,

      Rodney A Greenwald

    6. Re:no offense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally! We have the name of Anonymous Coward, his trolling days are over.

    7. Re:no offense.. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed which is why I always post AC.

    8. Re:no offense.. by zuperduperman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can you substantiate this in any way shape or form?

      From my own reading of the privacy policy, there is *no* mention of anything like this whatsoever.

      They mention premium accounts may have access to 'aggregated' data not available to non premium accounts. However that is a far cry from showing 'full details' of anyone.

      I am quite paranoid about my privacy but I am fairly sure LinkedIn is not dumb enough to be doing what you are saying.

    9. Re:no offense.. by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Informative

      2 minutes of surfing the LinkedIn website, or in case you're too lazy:

      http://www.quantumg.net/linkedin-recruiter.png

      Enjoy.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:no offense.. by zuperduperman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow. Thank you. This is actually quite concerning. I'm now at a loss as to how they justify this under their privacy policy. Unless I can find some kind of clarification of or control to disable this, I guess I will be deleting my account. Thanks again.

    11. Re:no offense.. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Why not just remove all the information from Linked in instead of railing against the site?

      Either way, there's no reason NOT to market yourself effortlessly. What's more, in California I've had 0 inquiries from LinkedIn but been able to aquire references whenever I ask from (most of) the people I've worked with, see where their careers have gone. I could just as well change my profile to be Goofy Mickey @ nowhere.com and still retained those benefits, changing my information back when I'm motivated to be contacted by whoever.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    12. Re:no offense.. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Did you even read my post? I asked them to remove my details.. they did.. eventually. I don't really care if people want to use LinkedIn, but it's not for me because I have no desire to get nagged by recruiters.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    13. Re:no offense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who's read QuantumG's posts on Slashdot knows that he doesn't understand "nicely worded"

    14. Re:no offense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you my mommy?

    15. Re:no offense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have tried a nicely worded one instead. That worked in one go for me.

      Perhaps the three strongly worded letters removed the internal stupidity, allowing your single success.

    16. Re:no offense.. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      And I asked, why didn't you change or remove your own? Linked in has nothing, I didn't give them and none of that is information I cannot change.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    17. Re:no offense.. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I don't know about now but, at the time, LinkedIn provided no mechanism to remove yourself from the site. You had to email an admin. Which is what I did.. and they removed about 80% of what was up there.. and then I emailed them to remove the rest.. and they did, almost, they left some searchable traces.. so I emailed them again and they finally removed all of it, as far as I could tell.

      Why do you care?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    18. Re:no offense.. by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but three strongly-worded letters is more than three times as much fun...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    19. Re:no offense.. by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Wow. Thank you. This is actually quite concerning. I'm now at a loss as to how they justify this under their privacy policy. Unless I can find some kind of clarification of or control to disable this, I guess I will be deleting my account. Thanks again.

      Because there's no serious risk that they'll get into legal trouble because of their privacy policy, duh. Privacy policies are worthless. No one in power is interested in privacy, and a lot of people with money want to violate it.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    20. Re:no offense.. by photozz · · Score: 1

      If it's no secret, then why did you post anything you had to "Strongly" demand they take down later? My Linkedin profile is filled out, and I don't care who sees it. There is nothing in there that I don't want people to see. Anyone who posts info to a site (any site...), regardless of the conditions, then b1tch3s about privacy concerns is amusingly naive.

      --


      Dirty Pirate Hooker
    21. Re:no offense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the only thing strangers can see is your name. Why are you afraid to put honest professional information out there?

      The issue isn't just random strangers on the web when the social networking site itself (and all its business partners) now has all of your personal information. Those privacy policies mean jack when the government comes knocking with or without a search warrant, when someone bribes a random employee of the site for a copy of their whole database, or when the company decides it doesn't want to follow its privacy policy anymore.

  7. It is entirely optional by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love this stuff... It is all optional. There is no requirement to do it. Oh, but if you don't opt in, your life will suck.

    My favorite is medical privacy forms:
    I, James T Victim, hereby give my consent to Dr. Scrupulous to share every facet of my every bodily function, my entire medical history (including incriminating stuff I have to reveal for medical purposes), and my entire credit record to whomever may request it for whatever reason. I understand that I can refuse to allow this sharing, but then the doctor may deny me medical care and I will likely die a horrible, painful death.

    1. Re:It is entirely optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but when the doctor refuses to see you, then what? I've had staff cancel my appointment for not signing.

  8. It propably won't.. by monse53 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was signed in to LinkedIn for a couple of years, and never had a single job offer (I'm MSc i Computer Science and have never been unemployed, just for the record). Neither have I heard of anyone else who has had any benefit from it. So it propably won't pay off. Or - has anyone got a job through LinkedIn?

    1. Re:It propably won't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was signed in to LinkedIn for a couple of years, and never had a single job offer (I'm MSc i Computer Science and have never been unemployed, just for the record). Neither have I heard of anyone else who has had any benefit from it.

      So it propably won't pay off. Or - has anyone got a job through LinkedIn?

      I got a blowjob.

    2. Re:It propably won't.. by edcheevy · · Score: 1

      Jobs won't fall from the sky just because you sign up with LinkedIn. Think of it more as a networking facilitation tool instead. For example, it makes it easier to target companies for informational interviews, since you can quickly and easily scan your contacts for links in companies you may be interested in. Any time you can avoid a cold call for something like that, you're a step ahead of the competition.

    3. Re:It propably won't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you're welcome..

    4. Re:It propably won't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of my friends got RIMjobs.

    5. Re:It propably won't.. by dave562 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just joined LinkedIn because of a job prospect that came up. Our phone system vendor wants me to design some Crystal Reports for them. She has a profile on there and has over 200 contacts. She is big on networking, online or otherwise. It's only a matter of time before I'm "Crystal Reports guy" in her social network. Like the OP, I generally try to stay away from Myspace, Facebook and the like. I made the exception in this case because someone who is offering me work told me that I could find even more work if I create a profile on there. My perspective on it at this point is that it can't hurt and it might help.

    6. Re:It propably won't.. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I was on LinkedIn.. Head hunters were nagging me day and night, so I kindly requested they take all my details off the site, and LinkedIn was happy to do it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:It propably won't.. by Dragonshed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People don't hand out job offers, on or off LinkedIn. What may happen is recruiters may attempt to contact you if your profile is desirable.

      I've had dozens of recruiters mail me through linked in over the last couple years, atleast one every couple of weeks. But that is missing the point. I'm less interested in making the recruiter's job easier and more interested in watching where my colleagues and former colleagues find new employment. *This* is the tool that is most interesting about linked in, traversing the connection tree of people you've work with from now to 10 years ago. And the person with the right mindset could use it to their advantage when looking for a new job.

    8. Re:It propably won't.. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I haven't used it to find a job, but I have used it to keep track of old coworkers to see where they're working now and to request references.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    9. Re:It propably won't.. by turbotroll · · Score: 1

      I got a blowjob.

      Was it from an 85-year old grandmother who removed her denture? If not, it doesn't sound like fun at all.

    10. Re:It propably won't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get TONS of offers to phone interview from Linkedin.

      Companies that have contacted me to request that I phone interview:

      Facebook
      Digg
      Linkedin
      Mint.com
      Mozilla
      CBS
      Any number of recruiters who happen to represent random startups.

      I get probably 3-5 requests a week, and I'm not anything special, just a PHP/Java dev. with a few years of experience. I have around 70 linkedin contacts and a couple of good recommendations.

      The best part is, when the companies contact me I get a feeling of power over the situation, rather than feeling like the one who needs a favor. Even if it isn't true, it alters my attitude such that I better represent myself.

      Although, to be fair, I'm about to start a job I didn't get through linkedin - so who knows...

    11. Re:It propably won't.. by swabeui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on how you define 'get a job'. If you define it as a tool for helping you find a job, then I know a few people who have got a job with it. When it came time for them to find something else they contacted every person they could through their profile and was able to get their resume in past normal channels.

      I think it is safe to say that most of us don't keep on contact with past co-workers but most will pass a resume on.

    12. Re:It propably won't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got hired in my current job through linkedin. A recruiter contacted me, we talked, I was interested and I signed...

    13. Re:It propably won't.. by turbotroll · · Score: 1

      So it propably won't pay off. Or - has anyone got a job through LinkedIn?

      I received a couple of offers, but didn't pursue them so I cannot be sure how serious they were. So far most of my jobs came to me thanks to Monster.

    14. Re:It propably won't.. by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      On the other hand I get 1-2 a week from big and small companies. I have my current job because one of those offers.

      So it must be you :-p

      In all seriousness, I actually ask each one of those recruiters to be "LinkedIn" with me, because when it's time for me to start looking, I have a bunch of contacts I can talk to immediately, and they've already looked at my resume and thought I was a good fit for a certain type of position.

      It took about a few years to go from "never been on LinkedIn" to my current situation, so it's not like its something that happens over night.

    15. Re:It propably won't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being known as the "Crystal Reports guy" can't hurt?? Wow. Your life must *suck*. I'm sorry, dude.

    16. Re:It propably won't.. by dave562 · · Score: 1

      It really sucks to get paid $75 an hour to use an easy to use program. The person with the sucky life is the person who posts anonymously on the internet in attempts to put other people down.

    17. Re:It propably won't.. by xristoph · · Score: 1

      well,

      1. afaik there's no direct contact info that's public on linkedin, so "day and night" seems a bit exaggerated
      2. did you try putting "I am not looking for a job currently, so please do not contact me for this purpose" on your linkedin page?
    18. Re:It propably won't.. by g00head · · Score: 1

      Actually, I joined LinkedIn, put up a brief version of my resume (just because and 'in case'), as I was unhappy where I was, but not enough to actively start job-hunting. Within about 2 months, I got a call from a headhunter for a global Net Admin position, which I interviewed for and got. So yes, jobs are a possibility through LinkedIn.

      --
      "I'd make a wooshing sound, but the post was so far over your head it was inaudible..."
    19. Re:It propably won't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only a matter of time before I'm "Crystal Reports guy" in her social network.

      Having used Crystal Reports before, you have my greatest sympathy. That is one skill set I am not putting on my resume and won't ever admit to any future potential employer.

    20. Re:It propably won't.. by dave562 · · Score: 1

      What's the stigma with Crystal Reports? I have been using the program for years and it is a great, dynamic reporting tool that can pull data from just about any data source out there. I've run into numerous situations where knowing Crystal Reports was an asset.

      How else do you guys get data out of your databases and format it for consumption by upper management?

  9. Does the economy really affect your principles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that the argument that you set up is that you don't use the personal networking sites because you don't want to lose control of your privacy and trust a 3rd party with your data.

    But since the economy goes bad, you saying that don't care about your privacy as much anymore?

    1. Re:Does the economy really affect your principles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he is currently employed, so finding a new job is a low priority for him. If he becomes unemployed or just anticipates becoming unemployed, finding a job becomes more important, probably more important than his privacy. The absolute value of his privacy doesn't change, but the value relative to finding a new job. "I was young and needed the money" doesn't (necessarily) mean the person's a slut.

  10. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if I should loosen up on the paranoia

    You, sir, should be banned from Slashdot

  11. Wait, what? by edcheevy · · Score: 1

    You're in IT and you think the only way people can put together your full name and your place of employment is through LinkedIn??

    I know a ton of people (IT and other) who have made the leap. I have a greater awareness of what they are doing professionally as a result (as opposed to something like Facebook which is much more personal). If nothing else it increases my awareness of their career goals when I see something pop up that might be perfect for them. Just be sure to only post what you're comfortable having the world know and pour through the privacy options on whatever site you sign up with. It's anecdotal, but profiles from social networking sites (if you're sharing them publically) seem to shoot to the top of Google rankings. What you put on there WILL be seen by potential employers when they do the cursory Google search.

  12. Social networking: not just for Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you feel that you might get the ax, or really before that's a possibility, start reaching out to folks in the industry. Make sure everyone knows what you're up to, and keep your resume up to date.

    A big thing is to make and maintain professional contacts at other companies. If you take someone to lunch every once and a while, that helps.

    The comment about the lottery is correct-- if you don't play at all, you have zero chance of winning. But there's another aspect that's similar-- you're unlikely to win big on a fluke. More likely, someone who already knows your skills and likes you personally will think of you when there's an open slot. In the upcoming tough economy, there won't be quite as many "casting calls" for jobs-- people are going to seek out the workers they want, because it's an employer's market.

  13. Use Social Networking to Defend Your Reputation by cyriustek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Social networking sites can be one avenue in which you lose your privacy. However, there is another side to this coin. Namely, do you want to be able to make your identity online, or do you want others to determine your identity?

    By using LinkedIN, Facebook and others, you can craft a very professional image that is put forth. In kind, you can be selective as to who you allow as a 'friend' or 'contact.' Therefor, your professional image retains intact.

    Obviously you want to avoid posting pictures of you doing your last beer bong, or wearing a lampshade on your head, whilst posting white papers, and pictures of you presenting at conferences.

    1. Re:Use Social Networking to Defend Your Reputation by autophile · · Score: 1

      Obviously you want to avoid posting pictures of you doing your last beer bong, or wearing a lampshade on your head, whilst posting white papers, and pictures of you presenting at conferences.

      /me sadly puts away photo of wearing a lampshade on my head whilst posting white papers.

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    2. Re:Use Social Networking to Defend Your Reputation by Samschnooks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...or do you want others to determine your identity?

      I am a very private person and I do not share much information about myself. Anyway, one day, I showed up at a function with a girlfriend. Folks were a bit surprised because they all thought I was gay. Talk about folks determining your identity! I have also been accused of being an alcoholic because I do not like to talk about what I do between jobs.

      I don't think a person should blab every minute detail about their life, but it is important to share a few things about yourself otherwise folks assume the worst. I have gone a bit far in preserving my privacy and as a result, it has hurt me because folks just assume I have a lot to hide.

    3. Re:Use Social Networking to Defend Your Reputation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person with any account on any "social networking" site = instant failure.

      Real professionals have real web sites, not an account on Myspace.

    4. Re:Use Social Networking to Defend Your Reputation by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      Piss off u alco fag!!!!! :-)

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. LinkedIn is basically for business by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    while FaceBook is more general. However, before you sign up with FaceBook, read their Terms of Use. It is pretty Draconian:

    "By posting User Content to any part of the Site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to the Company an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part) and distribute such User Content for any purpose, commercial, advertising, or otherwise, on or in connection with the Site or the promotion thereof, to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such User Content, and to grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing."

    Now, just below that there is a clause that says: "You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. If you choose to remove your User Content, the license granted above will automatically expire, however you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content. Facebook does not assert any ownership over your User Content; rather, as between us and you, subject to the rights granted to us in these Terms, you retain full ownership of all of your User Content and any intellectual property rights or other proprietary rights associated with your User Content."

    If you look at that carefully, it says that the "license" will automatically expire... but it doesn't say WHEN. The when is given in the first part: you have granted them "perpetual" license. Maybe ending after forever is better than not ending at all... I don't know.

    Further, they say that FaceBook does not assert ownership... of course not. You are the owner. But you have licensed them to do literally whatever they want with your data.

    I wouldn't touch a site like that with a ten-foot pole.

    1. Re:LinkedIn is basically for business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if you read it correctly the perpetual license expires when you choose to remove your "user content".

      ie the license expires at the earlier of forever, or when you delete everything off the site...

    2. Re:LinkedIn is basically for business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they corrected this after the large amount of negative media coverage they received.

    3. Re:LinkedIn is basically for business by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      No, it does not say that. It says *IF* you remove your content; it does not say when you remove your content. The only mention of "when" at all is in the earlier paragraph, and that says "perpetual". Not only that, but it says they can "archive" your data, subject to the licensing terms that were already stated above... which means that the "expiration" means nothing: the license remains in effect.

    4. Re:LinkedIn is basically for business by horatio · · Score: 1

      If you look at that carefully, it says that the "license" will automatically expire... but it doesn't say WHEN. The when is given in the first part: you have granted them "perpetual" license. Maybe ending after forever is better than not ending at all... I don't know.

      Just to play devil's advocate for a second, could this simply be for them to CYA so you can't come back later and bitch that your information is on a backup tape somewhere, so they don't have to go through every tape where your information might be and purge it?

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    5. Re:LinkedIn is basically for business by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting thought and I would not be surprised if that is the case... but again, those two sentences really don't say much of anything. If I were FaceBook I would remove them, just as they tried to do. The people who were screaming about it were screaming about literally nothing.

  16. Good enough for Marks then good enough for me. by auric_dude · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't want to linked into to any club that will have me as a member.

    1. Re:Good enough for Marks then good enough for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good ol' Marx.

    2. Re:Good enough for Marks then good enough for me. by Andyvan · · Score: 1

      I think you meant Marx, as in Groucho Mark.

    3. Re:Good enough for Marks then good enough for me. by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, he might just be a mark. Let me see:

      "Hey Auric, I heard a rumor that shares in SCO are going to go through the roof any day now. Do you want to buy some of mine?"

  17. Re: his name by wireloose · · Score: 4, Funny

    He thinks he's smart, hiding from us, but I googled Whoopass and found 1,180,000 hits.

  18. Don't give your name and occupation! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    They are everywhere and all out to get you!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  19. nice try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, Zuckerberg times are tough for everyone. Your terms of service thing backfired but this is no way to get new sign ups.

  20. Privacy Is Dead, Get Over It by mbstone · · Score: 3, Informative

    Privacy Is Dead, Get Over It with Steve Rambam: This is the first part of Rambam's essential lecture, presented in five-minute snippets. It's like a good book that you don't want to put down, you'll keep viewing the snippets (or search for the entire lecture if you have time to view it all at once). Nobody who uses LinkedIn or any other of what Rambam calls "self-contributed data sites" should miss this.

    1. Re:Privacy Is Dead, Get Over It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Scott McNealy is credited for having made the observation "You have zero privacy now, get over it", about ten years ago during the height of the original dot-com boom.

      Years from now, after Sun Microsystems has finally made its way to the great Stock Exchange in the sky, McNealy might *only* be remembered for having made that remark. In the meantime, he'll have his 4.9 handicap from the Northern Cali. Golf Association to fall back on.

  21. Sales & Privacy by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    Most VP's and other executives could care less about their own privacy -- any successful executive doesn't really have much in the first place. Remember, a lot of these people are actually forced to divulge their own pay structures as a part of being a public company. So for them to throw their details into such networking sites doesn't actually cost them anything -- it's just another phone book.

    On the other side of the coin, you shouldn't allow these difficult sales times to influence your decision of these networking sites because they still won't help. Most of these networking sites are simply an out-sourcing of maintaining accurate contact lists. I doubt that you're in one of those industries where your clients and suppliers change contact information with any degree of regularity. And the ones that do probably become useless to you anyway, or keep you informed on their own.

    Not to mention, in difficult times, these networking sites experience the same difficulties.

  22. Privacy options by tsvk · · Score: 1

    You seem to worry much about losing your privacy. Most social networking sites have rather extensive privacy settings, so you get to select in detail what should be revealed and to whom.

    The problem of course then is that managing these privacy settings can be quite tricky, if you don't have a clear picture of what knobs you have available to turn.

    Here is a rather recent and extensive walk-through of the most central privacy settings Facebook offers:

    http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/02/facebook-privacy/

  23. Re: his name by wireloose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oops, dawned on me that's just his surname, so I googled his whole name (Mr. Whoopass) and got 951,000 hits. This link is proof that we have access to much of his personal information, including links to his girlfriend, WhiteTrash. http://people.paltalk.com/people/users/Mr%20WhoopAss/index.wmt

  24. You're afraid to send out a resume? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait... so you're afraid to post your resume online?

    Who cares what your name is and where you work? The Yellow Pages are more invasive. They give your home address and name.

    When you meet someone at an informal function do you keep you name and place of employment secret as well? Just what exactly are you afraid someone would do with this information?

    When you send out a resume do you just list "'Company A', 'Company B', and 'Company C'" on your empoyment history? Or do you write it out and then black it all out with a marker like a top secret intelligence report?

    Stop waffling and start getting noticed online. I've gotten numerous job interviews that I didn't even apply for because people were reading forums and thought I sounded competant and knowledgable. In fact so far I've never needed to even apply for a job.

    If the only people who know about you work in your server room that's as far as your reputation extends. If they google your name which would you rather them find: Nothing or an insightful blog on proper network security procedures and a list of glowing praise from your superiors and coworkers?

    You are your name. That's your brand. Sell it! Make it famous!

    1. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's spelled competent.

      If you want to do social networking for your job, do it in a very directed manner in real life - like "What Color Is Your Parachute?" recommends. If you enjoy posting technical advice or comments to websites, then go ahead and do it, but there's generally a very low chance anything will come of it. If you meet someone in real life or talk with them over the phone, they're much more likely both to notice you and to remember you when they need some work done. Plus it's a directed process, which means that you'll be making progress and connections with people in areas and companies you actually have interest in - rather than just whoever happens to check a board or click on your friends' links.

    2. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by SalaSSin · · Score: 1

      With you there!

      I get a lot of to-the-point, good job offers because of the fact i'm on LinkedIn, so far, i've declined them all, because i get asked for jobs so far (damn i like saying this, makes me feel important ;-) )

      Just FYI: you're already on Facebook, friends or people you know put pictures of you online, and tagged you in them...

      So get on Facebook, never mind filling out your personal details, and start asking everyone who put compromising pictures of you online to remove them, or block it via the privacy settings.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    3. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where to start...

      Yellow Pages? Perhaps you mean the white pages, which map from a name to a phone number, and perhaps an address. And you can usually request not to be listed. Or you can put the phone line in another name, such as a business.

      As for the resume, someone who avoids networking sites is probably sending it out to a single potential employer. And it is reasonable to expect that that entity will not distribute said document outside of the HR department.

      You seem to be equating sharing information with a limited audience with making it public. They are not the same thing.

    4. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... so you're afraid to post your resume online?

      Yes. I send my resume out to places I want to work, I don't post it for all to see.

      Who cares what your name is and where you work? The Yellow Pages are more invasive. They give your home address and name.

      Absolutely. That's why I've always had an unlisted number and never showed up in the white pages. Why the hell would I want people to whom I didn't give my phone number to have an easy way of finding that number and harassing me?

      When you send out a resume do you just list "'Company A', 'Company B', and 'Company C'" on your empoyment history? Or do you write it out and then black it all out with a marker like a top secret intelligence report?

      When I send out a resume, I agree to give them information that I deem relevant. It's perfectly reasonable that a company wants to find out my name, address, and places I've worked at before hiring him. I don't send them a list of the last few books I got from the library, the music I listen to, or a list of who I hung out with last weekend.

      I've gotten numerous job interviews that I didn't even apply for because people were reading forums and thought I sounded competant and knowledgable.

      If I didn't apply somewhere I don't want to work there. Again, I don't want random people calling and harassing me.

      If they google your name which would you rather them find: Nothing or an insightful blog on proper network security procedures and a list of glowing praise from your superiors and coworkers?

      That's easy. Nothing.

      Seriously, that's what references are for. I list references on the resume.

      You are your name. That's your brand. Sell it! Make it famous!

      I don't want to be a goddamn brand. I want to be a person. My life is what I do in private. Work is the horrible thing I do in order to have money to live my life. Those two things are as separate as I can make them and I do my best to keep it that way.

    5. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Work is the horrible thing I do in order to have money to live my life.

      Sounds like you need to find a better job... The moment I stop enjoying my work, I'll find something else to do. Life is too precious to waste so many hours doing something I don't enjoy.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    6. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by Disk+Pickable · · Score: 1

      Wait... so you're afraid to post your resume online?

      Only on Monster.com...

    7. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I enjoy my work. I'd enjoy not working more. Therefore work is (much like the person you quoted) the horrible thing I do in order to have money.

      If I enjoyed my job less than other jobs I could do then at that point I'd need to find a better job. Give me a few million pounds to live off and I'll find a better pastime than working for a living.

    8. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by citylivin · · Score: 1

      "Who cares what your name is and where you work?"

      Me.

      Don't recognize me? Im that guy you cut off while talking on your cel phone in the safeway parking lot last week. I was kinda pissed, and being recently unemployed have lots of time on my hands, so i followed you home. What a nice house you have at 1234 lane. Good thing you have that address online so i could look up your resume. After keying your car at work (so you wouldn't have any idea who did it) I drove home and started doing more research. I see you have a nice 16 year old daughter as well, who similarly to you, keeps her facebook wide open. Looks like shes going to meet a new "freind" he he he...

      The above scenario, while not real, could be. Even if you think you have nothing to hide, there will always be people that feel "wronged" by you. All it takes is someone with the proper motivations, and you have then given them the keys to the castle. Ive used peoples facebook profiles against them in court and won. The difference in your scenarios is meeting someone informally at a conference does not index the information you provide forever on the internet. Information that is searchable by anyone who can infiltrate their way into your social network. This is why we use nicknames on the internet. Everyone who was on the internet in 1995 has this "common" knowledge. People today do not.

      If I used my real name online, I would simply not post some of my opinions for fear of future consequences. To me that is unacceptable. Personal anonymous expression is important for the sanity of society. Take that away and you just have everyone patting eachother on the back and saying nice things, lest they be sued for liable, offend someone, or worse.

      "You are your name. That's your brand. Sell it! Make it famous!"

      Fame. its not necessarily all its cracked up to be. Many people would rather live their lives under the radar. Many people do not let their jobs define them, or use other peoples worthless praise (or scorn) as a measure of their own self worth.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    9. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I enjoy my work. I'd enjoy not working more. Therefore work is (much like the person you quoted) the horrible thing I do in order to have money.

      So because one thing is more enjoyable than another, you'd describe the lesser thing as "horrible"? That doesn't quite make sense to me. I'd enjoy spending all day having sex with lingerie models much more than I enjoy my job, but it's not going to happen... what I spend around 60 hours a week doing is truly enjoyable to me. Not as good as the lingerie models, but still good. I'd definitely never describe it as "the horrible thing I do".

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    10. Re:You're afraid to send out a resume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When you send out a resume do you just list "'Company A', 'Company B', and 'Company C'" on your empoyment history? Or do you write it out and then black it all out with a marker like a top secret intelligence report?

      You laugh, but I recently read a resume that included job history details from "reputable company A", "reputable company B", etc

      Priceless

  25. Have you, you know... by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    *ASKED* for one? ;-)

    If anything, the fact that you do not get unsolicited job offers from random LinkedIn users speaks good about their "lets' be a bit more careful whom we show your real e-mail" attitude.

    Paul B.

  26. Who's the moron? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    since I know that just about every moron that has 'Vice President' or sits on the 'Executive Team' is already on LinkedIn and has no clue about why they should be trying to protect their identity

    Here's a question to you Mr_Whoopass, why should they be trying to protect their identity, and by that I mean what you mean, which is making sure no one knows that someone named like you works at the place you work. It sounds as if we were talking about dangers that everyone is aware of to the point it's not necessary to mention them. Well I don't know what dangers we're talking about, so do tell me what's the worst that could happen.

    Also, are you sure it was sceptic your mother taught you to be? It sounds to me like we left mere reasonable scepticism a long time ago.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  27. Can you afford not to be? by skware · · Score: 1

    As an IT Administrator, your users are going to be increasingly using such things as Facebook, Myspace, Gmail, Linked-In etc. Can you afford to be left behind and not know what is going on in your environments? You'd be stupid to think you could.

    1. Re:Can you afford not to be? by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the administrator and his sniffer are fully aware of what's going on in his environments.

  28. No. Not Now. Not Ever. I'm Coming For All Of You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If "Linked-In" was any good, they would PAY YOU for your information --and if you had decent parents, it would make for a more obvious decision to quickly run away from their offer.

    You might have less opportunities at your disposal, but at least the folks who consider you aren't "control freaks" (which means they are less likely to kill your organs with on-the-job stress that your wife doesn't get paid for).

    Don't listen to the kids! Privacy Does Matter.

  29. Connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Past a certain stage of your career, its no longer what you know, but rather whom you know.

    It's more of a professional site , catering to Engineers, VP's , etc, people that can recommend other people, and have something against that recommendation can stand.

    For IT people, places like facebook, and myspace are the place to go, since their careers are still in the entry-level phase.

    1. Re:Connections by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      For IT people, places like facebook, and myspace are the place to go, since their careers are still in the entry-level phase.

      You have an odd definition of "IT people"... I've been working in "IT" for nearly 10 years now, and while I'm still relatively young, I'm definitely not "entry-level" any more. I make more than the average "middle manager", but still significantly less than "top management".

      Oh, and in case you think perhaps I'm "stuck" doing my job - actually no, I enjoy it. I've been offered 3 different "management" positions in my current company and have always turned them down. I write code, and I enjoy writing code - I know I would NOT enjoy dealing with departmental budgets, resource allocation and whatever else it is that I'm currently (thankfully) shielded from by management.

      I do have a profile on LinkedIn and while it hasn't given me any direct benefit yet, I see no problem to post my professional life there, as it may come in handy in the future.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  30. footprint by funkelectric · · Score: 1

    I used to be on linkedin, but got tired of duplicating information that is already in my CV and on my website. Then linkedin has a way of nudging you towards filling in ever more stuff (previous employers et cetera), if I remember correctly perhaps even with some daft reward system. It has both free and paid-for services, and I very soon ran into the limits of the free service. Many of the establish-a-link e-mails I received felt tedious and some people like to farm links like, well, link farms. But first and foremost these days I wish to control my footprint on the web, especially regarding the type of information that linkedin requires. Hence I withdrew. It may well be that if I were unemployed or simply looking for another job linkedin could be useful. To me the uncertainty in the rewards and the cost of playing are too large.

  31. job potential by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most jobs are found through networking and friends. Only the worst, lowes-end jobs are in the paper. That's plain fact. I've started over a few times, and I'm not interested in having to do it again.

    I dunno if LinkedIn is the best place to grow your networking, but it's an avenue. If you're careful with it, I think it could be a valuable tool. I haven't yet had to put it to the test, and I hope I don't have to any time soon. But it's something that you need to build while you have a job, and not wait until you're already out of work.

    I agree with another poster--of the networking social sites out there, Linked In appears to be the only one that has career value.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:job potential by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. I've never gotten a job from a paper, but I have through Monster, headhunters, and job fairs (back in college). While one of these ended up being a bad match for me, none of them were bottom of the barrel job other than the right out of college one, which is supposed to start at low responsibility as you season. My current job was from a job board contact, and I was basically hired on to be the main man on my team and one of the top programmers at the company.

      On the other hand, it would have to be a lose the house type situation before I'd consider taking a job interview from a friend. If you do badly there, either due to performance or due to politics, it would reflect badly on them. I wouldn't add that kind of stress to a friendship unless I had no other options.

      Undoubtedly you can get good jobs from friends/family. I know people who have, I've even gotten people interviews. But its hardly the only way. And from my experience at company's I've worked for, less than 50% got their jobs that way.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:job potential by one_in_a_milli0n · · Score: 0

      Most jobs are found through networking and friends. Only the worst, lowes-end jobs are in the paper. That's plain fact.

      No, it's not. My wife just landed her dream job after responding to an ad in the local paper. It probably depends what your business is and what you are looking for. But even in IT, online job offers can be a pretty good resource. The fact notwithstanding that personal references are indeed a strong force in job hunting.

    3. Re:job potential by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

      Most technical jobs have requirements which are far too specialized to be filled through networking and friends. That's a plain fact.

      Actually, it's just an anecdotal report plus the application of inductive reasoning. But it's based on thirty years of diverse professional experience rather than on uncritically repeating the same tired old urban myth. Chance acquaintance probably works just fine for generalist positions. But if you need a molecular biologist who has experience building clustered supercomputers, simple word of mouth is unlikely to put you in touch with anyone remotely qualified.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    4. Re:job potential by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      But if you need a molecular biologist who has experience building clustered supercomputers, simple word of mouth is unlikely to put you in touch with anyone remotely qualified.

      On the contrary, specialist positions usually work better at networking than others. Are you such a person as that described, or is that just a hypothetical? 'Cause I've worked with people exactly like that at the NHGRI, and they pretty much all knew each other--they read each other's papers and went to the same conferences.

      Do you think you can get that kind of person by advertising in the paper? Maybe. But more than likely someone knows a student or colleague that would be good for the job, and they recommend them. Or, even more likely, the folks with the position recruit someone away from their current position instead of trying to fill it with an unknown quantity.

      Anyway, I think if you're looking for work there's little sense in reducing your profile. I think LinkedIn profiles can be managed appropriately, and therefore the reward potential is larger than the risk. All you risk that is some time, and it doesn't take a lot.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    5. Re:job potential by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

      Anyway, I think if you're looking for work there's little sense in reducing your profile>/i>

      I agree with you there.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
  32. My in/out rules by papaia · · Score: 1

    Link-in with whom it may make sense, professionally only (Linkedin = mostly professional social network, vs. Facebook, Twitter, Socialedian, FriendFeed, Myspace, etc.) but definitely do NOT link with coworkers - it would make no sense (although I work in a company where almost all office employees have linked w/each other, to the point that no one can handle the internal "social noise").

    --
    == With enough Will Power, one could move mountains. With enough Brains, one would just leave them where they are ==
    1. Re:My in/out rules by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I tend to link with coworkers when I leave a job. That way I have their contacts afterwards. Unless they link to me earlier, in which case I accept.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  33. As a credit professional... by svunt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I heart facebook & linkedin. Used to be hard to find high-value debtors once they left the country, now linkedin tells me where they are and who they work for. I work in Melbourne, and every week I lovate people in Istanbul, Dubai, Honh Kong, LA, Brussels....once facebook or linkedin gives me a bunch of info to start with, the rest is easy. Like other posters have noted, some people cannot afford not to have a presence on these sites. Works for me...KA-CHING

    1. Re:As a credit professional... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a landlord... ditto. If I see you on facebook and your profile says you like to do stupid shit, or your profile picture is of you doing something idiotic, chances are you're not going to be paying me rent. I'm not renting to you. Most profiles are private (but I've come across one guy's that wasn't). In that event, I'm considering creating a sock puppet, but haven't yet.

      Immoral? Invasion of privacy? Bullshit. You put it online and it tells me as much as a credit report. If it's online, it's fair game.

    2. Re:As a credit professional... by svunt · · Score: 1

      Yah...in my line I find that there's a correlation between over-committing oneself in an attempt to make more money and having a public Facebook profile that includes a bunch of obnoxious group memberships and a photo of one standing in front of a Porsche.

  34. Kill all the LIONs. by Animats · · Score: 1

    There are successful people on LinkedIn. There's also an army of annoying losers, called "LIONs", trolling for friend requests. These are mostly consultants and marketeers trying to use LinkedIn to spam. They get really annoyed if you click "I don't know this person", because a few of those actions turns off their ability to spam.

    LinkedIn has a overreaching EULA like Facebook tried, but that's less of an issue because one can't upload much to LinkedIn.

    1. Re:Kill all the LIONs. by turbotroll · · Score: 1

      There are successful people on LinkedIn. There's also an army of annoying losers, called "LIONs", trolling for friend requests. These are mostly consultants and marketeers trying to use LinkedIn to spam. They get really annoyed if you click "I don't know this person", because a few of those actions turns off their ability to spam.

      I add people to my network only if I know them personally and also appreciate them. That's why I have less then 50 connections after a couple of years.

      By the way, what happens when you click "I don't know this person" on somebody's invitation? Do they receive any answer or simply get blocked from inviting you again?

    2. Re:Kill all the LIONs. by turbotroll · · Score: 2, Informative

      By the way, what happens when you click "I don't know this person" on somebody's invitation? Do they receive any answer or simply get blocked from inviting you again?

      It seems it's visible from invitation status in the outbox, as explained here.

      Apparently, receiving five "I don't know" responses to invitations will introduce restrictions to your account. For example, you won't be able to invite anybody without knowing her email address.

  35. do it by adpowers · · Score: 1

    I'd be skeptical of someone, especially in IT, who has no online presence. I believe it is good to build up a brand around your name on the internet. You should be in control of what potential future employers see when they Google you. It is better for you to be in the top spot for your name then someone else talking about you, or something with the same name.

    When I first joined the internet, I asked my parents if I could have a website on Geocities. They said no. I didn't listen and went behind their back to create it. I didn't have any info besides my first name, so there was no real harm (and I was smart enough not to meet up alone with random strangers, not that I was ever propositioned).

    In 2001 I bought a domain named after me and blogged on it (although, it took years for me to admit it was a blog, since those had a bad stigma attached :) ). More recently I've posted the occasional technical entry. Because of this I've been cold called (well, e-mailed) from major companies asking if I want to interview.

    It is 2009, nearly everyone has some sort of online presence now. It is unlikely you'll be targeted just for having your name out there. It is much more likely bad things will happen when a company you deal with is hacked and your information is stolen that way. Plus, you can use your presence as a defense. If I wasn't the top result on Google for my name, people might think I was an anti-semite author.

    Andrew Hitchcock

  36. Yes by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a word, yes, you're being excessively paranoid. To be sure, there are bits of information you don't publicize. but I don't think your name and where you work, just by themselves, meet that criteria unless you're in the CIA or something. Your social, your credit card numbers, address, home phone number, and all that, sure. Keep those to yourself. I don't understand why your name and where you work is such a great secret. I think you vastly overestimate the value of knowing the John Doe works for Regional Restaurant Chain.

    It's rare that I say this in a security context, but loosen up a little. :)

  37. The opposite problem by RyoShin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have thus far managed to stay completely below the radar and a search on Google has nothing on my real persona.

    I actually have the opposite problem: my first and last name combination is so common that I doubt I actually appear anywhere in the first 50 pages of Google Results. Adding my middle name gets nothing. It's only when you add my university that you start getting hits that are me.

    I used to think this was a cute benefit. However, with more and more employers doing searches, and my work being all about the web, I realized that having no results related to me could actually be negative. While I don't go out search for them, this insight has caused me to be much more lenient towards any site that is recommended to me, such as LinkedIn, or even an account on a career/job site. I still keep them fairly sparse, but it's better that I have something to point to ("No, that's some other FirstName RyoShin, I'm FirstName M. RyoShin, and THIS is my account on that site") to help ease any confusion.

    I'm not gaining any privacy by doing this, but I don't think I'm losing any, either. Furthermore, I am gaining recognition and a firm reputation.

    1. Re:The opposite problem by darpo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have had to perform Hadoukens in interviews because employers don't believe I'm Ryu. With an online presence, employers can see beforehand that I am competent with the surge fist (where I thrust my palms forward, sending a surge of spirit energy or ki flying towards the opponent).

  38. Get over it... by jopsen · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As a kid I was always told not to give my real name and address online because there could be pedophiles... :)

    * Loss of privacy.

    Yes, but in general you shouldn't share information on facebook, twitter, you blog, website or anywhere else online that you don't want everybody else in the world to know about you.
    That's as simple as it gets... Now really is your full name something you don't want to share with everybody else?
    Also it's okay to be critical about what pictures you accept being associated to on facebook... And it's okay to censor your blog for comments you don't want people posting on it...
    Personally, I've linked my slashdot account to my website, on which my name, address, email and phone number can be found. And so to the extent possible I try to only post stuff that I'd stand by (yes, sometimes I'll stand by for some bad comments too :))...
    And if I absolutely must say something I don't want put my name on, then I'll consider if I really ought to post it anyway, and I must AC is always an option.

    It's a lot like real life.

    It that a metaphor people on slashdot understand? How about a car analogy.
    (Sorry, couldn't help but wondering :) )

    1. Re:Get over it... by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Also it's okay to be critical about what pictures you accept being associated to on facebook...

      Even if you don't associate yourself with a picture on Facebook, a friend can still upload a picture of you and a current employer or coworker or prospective employer, may see it and recognize you. This can cause more trouble than it's worth.

      I guess it depends on what activities you partake in in your off-hours, and how you'd feel about your boss or your coworkers or a hiring manager knowing about these activities and seeing them. I have a friend who works as a lawyer for the Federal government that deals with Federal government unions, and she noted that a frequent issue of misconduct or coworker complaint arises from social networking sites. A black coworker might see your Facebook page, click on a friend link, and see a picture of you at a Halloween party dressed in a KKK robe. Or a prudish coworker may see a picture of you at a strip club with your buddies. Etc., etc.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    2. Re:Get over it... by xilmaril · · Score: 1

      Even if you don't associate yourself with a picture on Facebook, a friend can still upload a picture of you and a current employer or coworker or prospective employer, may see it and recognize you.

      as long as you untag yourself from those photos, the odds of them finding it are pretty tiny though... if your potential company is going to pore over all your coworkers photos looking for something embarrassing, they're the CIA or obsessive compulsives who couldn't function in the real world.

    3. Re:Get over it... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I've yet to figure out what this "real" life is and how it differs from the living I'm doing right now while typing.

      Last I checked, we living breathing human beings on the Internet are no less alive or real than when we're out in person.

      The difference is the perceived ability to get away with lying (like anyone is honest in public either) and the lack of visual identifiers for prejudice.

      Sorry, not a rant against you ;-) Just those who make such comments.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Get over it... by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      The seeing people again part, having them recognize your face, being able to fact check other people's statements (by mutual friends). Being able to touch each other (for better or worse); you can be hurt if you start a fight, or get arrested, and you can have sex, have a child. The internet is not the real world.

    5. Re:Get over it... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      And blind people don't live real lives? How about the deaf or otherwise physically impaired?

      In the same way that your living is restricted in action between school, the mall, work, the theatre and a coffee shop, you live differently on-line, but it is no less real living than playing paint ball with your friends and acting like soldiers when you're not.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:Get over it... by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1
      Blind people can hear other's voice, feel other's touch, and in many ways they (and other disabled people) are even more dependent on the people around them than able bodied people are, and are therefore more connected to the real world.

      It's the difference between playing paint ball and being in Iraq. In the real world you can't just change your user name, and you can get hurt.

  39. Linked-In by AaronW · · Score: 1

    I have found Linked-In to be an excellent tool as a professional. It allows me to keep track of former colleagues and is proving to be invaluable now since I was recently laid off due to downsizing. Linked-in is geared towards professional contacts. It is not a regular social networking site. Most of my former colleagues are on it and it's great to see where everyone is working. It has features like specifying your current job status and leaving recommendations for people.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  40. Don't be too paranoid by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consider this: your name, address and who you work for are hardly personal, private information (in most cases, at least). The first two anybody can find by opening the phone book. The last probably isn't instantly available to J. Random Passerby but generally isn't something you keep too private. I'd guess most of your friends know where you work, as does anybody they talk to about you. So I'm personally not too concerned about that information being on places like Facebook, Linkedin and the like. I actually put it up there myself so somebody else doesn't impersonate me or get mistaken for me (or if they do, I can point whoever's making the mistake at my page and point out that their mistake wasn't for my lack of having the correct entry up there).

    Now, I'm not going to put details of my personal life up on those sites. It's strictly name, address, current employer, and a pointer to my Web site and resume. More than that, is not those social-networking sites are for as far as I'm concerned.

    1. Re:Don't be too paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay for an unlisted phone number and have all mail correspondence sent to a PO Box. So no, the first two are not going to be found by anyone opening a phone book. And I know I'm not the only one who does this.

    2. Re:Don't be too paranoid by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      "And I know I'm not the only one who does this."

      At least, that's what we would all like you to think...

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  41. Depends on how you use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a name like "Mr. Whoopass", I'd hope you're not using your Slashdot account for anything serious. That being said, I'd go ahead and create a LinkedIn account with your real name and a separate email account, so that you could have two persona, one professional and one personal.

    Frankly, I wish I'd have thought of creating this separation myself, which is why I'm posting this anonymously. I have a Slashdot account, but the email address that it's linked to gives a huge clue as to my real identity.

    Since you're an IT professional, I'm sure you can find some potential issue with it, but unless you're in a very influential position, I seriously doubt that people would be overly interested in the fact that "J. Random IT Guy" is the same person who posts to Slashdot as "Mr. Whoopass."

  42. Protect your identity by controlling your identity by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I created a Facebook account solely because somebody with the same name as I already had one, and people were assuming his profile was mine. So by creating a minimal profile on that social networking site, I took better control over my identity.

    Linkedin has definite professional benefits, allows you to maintain limited contact with former co-workers, people who you might later find working in the same city as you've just moved to, or the firm where you are thinking of applying for a job.

    If you refuse to voluntarily publish positive information about yourself, what will potential employers find? If nothing at all, they may tend to assume the worst, or at least assume you have no notable skills, hobbies, friends or publications.

  43. no online id == no xp by Foofoobar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Alot of time when going through resumes, if we try to Google the person, do a usenet lookup or other such things and can't find them anywhere, to us (when evaluating resumes), it means you are lying on your resume or have very little work experience. Mainly because people in IT use the internet day in and day out to communicate, ask the community how to do something and so on.

    If you aren't communicating, it doesn't tell me that you just aren't communicating, it tells me you have little experience. And in a sense, because you aren't using this resource for what it is for, it is somewhat true. Start posting questions in forums, and creating an online identity. Some online identity is better than NONE.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:no online id == no xp by thoglette · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which means you won't be hiring many mature non-narcissists.

      As we both are currently doing, many people use a nom de plume on the web. As a sometime consultant this part ticularily useful - I can be honest in my opinions on line without embarassing clients who, for perfectly valid business reasons, chose a path other than "the right one".

      --
      -- Butlerian Jihad NOW!
    2. Re:no online id == no xp by Foofoobar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So only narcissists post questions in online forums? Only narcissists have friends or contacts? Only narcissists publish articles? Thats an intriguing definition of a narcissist.

      Most IT professionals will at some time or another HAVE to do something they are unfamiliar with and have posted in a forum online a question on how to integrate or use a library or so on. This has nothing to do with being a narcissist. It has to do with searching for information. People who don't do this scare me as they think they can do everything themselves without asking for help. A person who knows their limits and knows how to ask for help is someone I want to hire plus I want to see their communication style.

      Not having a trail signifies that you do not communicate, feel that you are a one man show or are inexperienced. All are red flags for hiring.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wants to work for an ass with an attitude like that? Not I!

    4. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have an entire department of top-notch IT staff who all - collectively - have almost ZERO online id - including me. Each and every one of my hires has at least double the appropriate experience as any of the other dozens of candidates we interviewed - many/most with EXTENSIVE online id's in various networks.

      Your comment is illogical and incorrect.

      Posted by Anonymous Coward - check out my linkedbook facedin tubespace twitter flickr profile and hire me! Surely if I have all these online ID's I must be a good employee!

    5. Re:no online id == no xp by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Unemployed beggars can't be choosers. Besides, you would know if you had more than one job that at every job there is an 'ass' as you like to say and no job is perfect. If you are looking for the perfect job where everyone showers you with praise and lays rose petals at your feet, you are going to be unemployed for far longer than this recession.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    6. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness I'm not applying to you for a job.

      Maybe I haven't asked questions online because I prefer to ask questions face to face, by email or telephone.

      Maybe it's because I don't want the only persona associated with my time with a certain employer to persist beyond that time, when I have no control over it.

      My professional online interactions are very seldom public, and I would doubt that any sensible employer would have it any other way.

      As for my private online persona, that has nothing at all to do with my work, and you won't find it mentioned anywhere in my CV.

      Thanks, and good night.

    7. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally, in the professional world, there are a lot of avenues that can be exhausted before one must ask on a forum.

      Books, papers, colleagues, consultants, suppliers, etc. The fact that one hasn't asked for help publicly is in no way an indicator that one has not asked for help. It is more an indicator of your narrow world view.

    8. Re:no online id == no xp by xristoph · · Score: 1

      Well, consider this: I, as many others, use different identities for different purposes. So most likely, if you search for me, you will NOT find a major part of my forum posts if I only give you my name, educational and professional history.

      If sb isn't communicating, it tells me exactly that. If the internet and business networking is an important part of his/her potential job, it would make a negative impression if the person doesn't even have a linkedin/xing/etc. profile. Don't try to link things that are obviously unconnected, like experience and online presence.

    9. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ironic to me, because I feel no need to slap my name around the internet to prove I have a degree from a big 10 college, and can code better than 90% of the programmers I know.

      Posting questions in forums is retarded. If I can't Google for the answer in 5 minutes, the module is poorly documented. (so DB2 is poorly documented. oracle is ok. java, spring framework, and hibernate are good. yes I do java mostly)

      The only time I had to post in a forum was because oracle was having resource locking problems, and we needed to know the magic SQL to have it tell us what user id was running the rogue SQL.

      but like one of the above sources said, if you think "an internet presence" is the principal component of a good hire, I wouldn't want to work for you either.

    10. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Mr. Foofoobar, there's a new thing on the intertubes, it's called nicknames and handles, sometimes it doesn't match the real offline name.

    11. Re:no online id == no xp by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Alot of time when going through resumes, if we try to Google the person, do a usenet lookup or other such things and can't find them anywhere, to us (when evaluating resumes), it means you are lying on your resume or have very little work experience. Mainly because people in IT use the internet day in and day out to communicate, ask the community how to do something and so on.

      And if we did a search and found that they'd identified both themselves and their employer while asking technical questions in public forums, that would be a big black mark. In fact a recent security audit forced on us by one of our customers specifically required that the auditor search the Internet for any evidence of our employees accidentally giving away excessive information about our current infrastructure by asking questions in public.

      You haven't really considered the implications, probably because you're not actually in the position that you're claiming to be in. Or maybe you're just really bad at it. Either way you're an annoying prick.

    12. Re:no online id == no xp by houghi · · Score: 1

      I keep my nick and real live name as much separated as possible. So if you would look up my real name (which will be shown in the CV) you will find almost nothing about me. From my name and details, you might think I did the marathon in a certain time, yet that is a person with the same name who has a very similar background as I have.

      Whenever I get a new boss or a new cow orker, I do a search and almost never find anything of interest if anything at all. Yet these people often do/did an excellent job.

      To me it seems as if you are passing up on some people by not even giving them a chance. You rather go for people who have good social skills and not so much people who are good in the technical skills. If that is what you are looking for, great. If not, you have the risk of hiring a talker not a doer.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:no online id == no xp by rec9140 · · Score: 1

      Your comment is EXACTLY why I do not use my online name and my real name. I don't provide info to prospective employers on my personal sites etc..

      x-archive: no

      Thats the first thing I do on any NNTP client.

      You want to verify my resume, pick up the PHONE and CALL the employers and references. PERIOD.

      --
      1311393600 - Back to Black
    14. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But plenty of us, Foofoobar, don't use our real names when posting.

      Since there's no way to go back and claim credit for all the insightful stuff I've done pseudonymously without also taking blame for tons of stuff that I or others have done under the same or a similar pseudonym, the best I could do would be to "start fresh", using my real name to forge a brand-new identity starting today.

      I'd rather be the guy who's been so careful with his online presence as to be almost invisible since 1994, than the noob who just got online in 2009.

    15. Re:no online id == no xp by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      There needs to a fuckedboss.com, disguised as a professional networking site for managers of technical people, where whacked PHB's like you can sign up so that when we're looking for a job, we can look up the hiring manager's name to see if we should even show up for the interview.

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    16. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? If you're an IT professional, you should know that IT professionals are more likely to want to protect their identity and post with a nick. Is your real name foofoobar?

      Worst. Hiring. Policy. Ever.

    17. Re:no online id == no xp by mitchellsoft · · Score: 1

      Alot of time when going through resumes, if we try to Google the person, do a usenet lookup or other such things and can't find them anywhere, to us (when evaluating resumes), it means you are lying on your resume or have very little work experience.

      If you aren't communicating, it doesn't tell me that you just aren't communicating, it tells me you have little experience.

      So if you search for the name on my resume and miss the multitude of posts under my account named "sir_fix_a_lot" then I have no experience? Maybe I'm wrong, and I usually am, but I don't list the account names for all of my online forums, etc., on my resume. You have probably missed out on some pretty decent talent with that narrow-minded approach.

    18. Re:no online id == no xp by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      In this day an age, anybody with enough technology experience will have dropped out of the radar since they have learned that anything you put on the Internet under your own name will be there forever and might come back to bit you later one. (Hands up for anybody that never posted something stupid to a forum/Usenet in the heat of a flamewar and later regretted it)

      The really experienced people will post under aliases and at most will have basic profiles in places like LinkedIn and Facebook with well vetted bits of info.

      You can be pretty damn sure that the last of the posts you can find with my name on the Net is in comp.lang.* from 12 years ago while if you search for my nick you'll figure out a lot more about present me (including political leanings) without actually knowing who I am.

      So the people you will find with lots of posts on the Internet under their names are not the most experienced, they're actually the ones which are a bit experienced but not enough.

    19. Re:no online id == no xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Respectfully, I think your conclusions are incorrect.

      The experience on my resume is accurate. You can call my references to verify that I'm not making the stuff up.

      I like my privacy and I don't need everyone to now what I'm up to and I don't need people following me from forum to forum. I post questions and look for help when I need it, and do plenty of lurking to soak up as much info as I can. But I hide my identify. I use different names on different forums and I never give information/examples which can be traced back to where I work. Call me crazy if you like, I just don't think the entire world needs to be able to follow me around online.

      The next time you like someone's resume but can't find any info on them online, give them a shot anyway and check their references after the interview. If they aren't lying, their reference should back them up... at least mine would.

    20. Re:no online id == no xp by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Yes but all of those are far slower. The online forum is an insta-response, doesn't use a support incident and should always be your FIRST check if you do not have a book on the subject readily available to you on the subject matter (as alot of people don't).

      However, if people have access to Safari online, the O'Reilly online book service, your point is far more valid as they have a subscription to an entire library of resources. Still, reading through a book may take a couple hours to try and find the paragraph you are looking for when a forum post can take 15 minutes.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    21. Re:no online id == no xp by dahedgefox · · Score: 1

      The other commenter was using narcissist in an incorrect sense. I think all he was saying is that people do post questions on forums, but they use pen name (nom de plume), an alternate name. A search may not yield any results, but you may not be searching for the right name.

  44. Business cards by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use LinkedIn in the same way that I would keep a business card that someone gives me. However, the advantages of LinkedIn are:

    1. When they move company, their details are automatically updated and I don't lose contact. I've got a load of business cards which I have no quick way of verifying if they're still accurate.
    2. I can export my contacts into a format which Outlook will happily read. Not a chance with Facebook.
    3. LinkedIn is geared around working connections, so you don't get all the fluff that you'd get with Facebook. This allows me to keep working contacts and friends separate.
    4. I can see how people are related to people I know - which is useful when I'd like to get some references from people I trust.
    5. It shows employees that when I say I have links to certain people in companies, I'm actually being truthful.
    6. It allows me to have a "way in" to a company as someone working there invariably used to work with someone else I know. I found a great software development team through a colleague of a colleague.
    7. It allows me to find people for specific requests easier. Someone I know wanted to talk to someone at Apple about iSync support for a device, LinkedIn provided him with the Product Managers name and a person they both knew.
    8. They have quite a good jobs selection which, whilst small, is generally more targeted to the roles you're interested in doing.
    9. It's great for being head-hunted or job hunting as a whole as recruiters can access your details (provided you let them) and offer you possible opportunities.

    There are probably more. If I was forced to drop Facebook or LinkedIn, I'd drop Facebook as LinkedIn is significantly more useful to me.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  45. Go ahead and make a page by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 1

    I'd create an account on each one of those sites. Whip it up so it looks kind of professional, but not that you're a stiff. List some favorite movies, books, and whatnot so you seem human. Put one of those stupid apps like lolcat or something.

    I'd suggest making a page on at least Facebook (that seems to be the biggy these days, MySpace is for preteens and music bands. I haven't heard of LinkedIn before today). The reason being is because ANYONE can create a page, and that could mean someone makes a page of you. It could be your friends, making a stupid joke, or it could be some e-stalker. They could list a few tidbits of your real information, and now all of a sudden this page looks like its yours. By owning the page you'll eliminate that chance, though of course on Facebook if someone else posts a naughty picture of you everyone can still see it if your friends' pictures are unrestricted.

  46. Take control of your brand by Tumbarumba · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having some sort of online presence is a great way to control (or at least influence) the image about you online. There's a heap of stuff on google about personal brand management. This one looked like it had a lot of relevant points regarding why you should consider this to be important: http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/04/building_personal_brand.html

    --
    My business: Farstrider Studios.
  47. If it's all available anyway... by philmck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Basic information such as name, address, phone number, spouse's name, employer and so on are (usually) publicly available and trivial to find, e.g. from the electoral roll. I can't see any point in hiding them and personally I make no attempt - they're right there on my web page.

    Having used online employment agencies, my CV is also pretty much public information and I have put that on my web page as well. I've found at least one permanent job and a contract as a result.

    It may still be prudent not to broadcast your birthdate and mother's maiden name because they're unfortunately sometimes used as security questions, but it's barely worth it because they're pretty easy to discover as well. Maybe it just gives a false sense of security, in fact.

    It's possibly still worth making some effort to conceal email addresses from spambots, but that battle is pretty much lost as well.

    Bank account details are on every cheque you write (and every electronic payment) so any security based on criminals not knowing them is shaky at best. They're not really secret. Credit card numbers (and even the CVV) are pretty easily read by any waiter or shopkeeper.

    My point is, a lot of personal information people think is private or obscure isn't really hard to find at all. It's safest to assume it's all known and concentrate on other security measures (encryption, effective passwords...) for the important stuff.

    --
    Phil McKerracher
  48. High profile hasn't been a problem by argent · · Score: 1

    When I google myself, the first reference to my name is in the early '80s, in the SF-LOVERS mailing list. I have a pretty high profile, online, and I haven't found it to be a problem. In fact it's probably better that people looking for me don't think I'm an exotic photographer in San Francisco (though I dare say he's got a more interesting life than I do... I have to admit envying the other Peter da Silva). I'm also occasionally mistaken for Dan Silva (creator of Deluxe Paint) and another James da Silva (creator of Amanda).

  49. Self-fulfilling prophecy by garote · · Score: 1

    These opt-in social networks are self-fulfilling prophecies. The more you fret about them, the more they will matter to low-grade HR goons.

    LinkedIn contains only enough information to obscure the difference between a competent worker and a job-hopping nincompoop, and a six-hour barrage of interviews will weed the latter out eventually anyway. If you're in the first category, why would you let these other people ride on your good name? (And if you're in the second category ... good luck with that.)

    No, your surest bets as both an employer and an employee remain:

    1. Recruiters and/or recruitment exercises
    2. Personal applications
    3. Personal referrals

    Do you see a recruiter passing you over because a web search reveals you have fewer than 10 "livejournal friends"? Then why would you obsess over LinkedIn, FaceBook, MySpace, blah blah? News flash: The internet isn't real life. Two phone calls, to your last two resume listings respectively, will take an HR man four minutes to complete and will steer your name to the interview docket or the trash can.

    1. Re:Self-fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. LinkedIn is a fad, that will pass (along w/ MySpace, Suckbook, etc.), and be as important as getting an AOL keyword for your business.

  50. Are you going to link your public profile to /.? by Thad+Zurich · · Score: 0

    Because if you are, your fears are well-founded. OTOH, my public pages on linkedin, facebook, etc. don't say "Thad Zurich" on them, and no, I'm not going to tell you what they do say.

  51. Get over yourself. by jjgm · · Score: 1

    Privacy is not important and it's a myth that you ever had it. Your identity is not important. If it gets stolen, you can make a new one. In the meantime, you're just being another antisocial geek who didn't learn the value of networking.

  52. there's a real Netiquette problem here by spywhere · · Score: 1

    Several of my friends don't seem to understand that it is inappropriate to provide someone's private Email address to anybody without their consent in advance.

    That's the bottom line here: an Email that says, "Invitation to connect on LinkedIn" really means "Some idiot gave us your Email address, and we will pester you until you give us more information."

    It's just as bad as an E-greeting card, or "click to Email this article." STOP DOING IT.

    1. Re:there's a real Netiquette problem here by turbotroll · · Score: 1

      Several of my friends don't seem to understand that it is inappropriate to provide someone's private Email address to anybody without their consent in advance. That's the bottom line here: an Email that says, "Invitation to connect on LinkedIn" really means "Some idiot gave us your Email address, and we will pester you until you give us more information." It's just as bad as an E-greeting card, or "click to Email this article." STOP DOING IT.

      Mod this up.

      What you described is a highly annoying feature of most social networking sites, including LinkedIn. Some of them will even allow you to upload your whole address book, or ask you to supply your password to webmail, so that they can log in to your mailbox and get addresses of all your correspondents. Only a complete idiot would use such a feature, and I was appalled to find out that some of my colleagues "IT professionals" do it.

      This is one of the reasons why social networking sites mostly disgust me -- they encourage their users to apply peer pressure on their behalf as a marketing tool. Even LinkedIn (which I tolerate, as described elsewhere) does this.

  53. LinkedIn worked for me by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    I quit my job a couple of years ago to start a software consultancy. I signed up for Linked-in and added all my co-workers from the previous company. I did not put any more work into it than this. Few months later I got a very lucrative consulting contract through it.

    I am not sure what the downside of putting my resume out there for all to see is. I cannot think of any. The upside is certainly very clear to me.

    The only time I value my privacy online is when I am dishing out my honest opinion on a subject that might offend some people. Potential employers included. Most other times I do not care if people find out my name, where I work and what I do for a living.

  54. How it's seen in corporate America by Argyle · · Score: 1

    The truth is, what can be googled about you will play a role if you want a new job.

    My job is basically being a CIO/CTO type for a segment of a F100 company. In my experience, every person that comes to meet with with me, salesperson, interviewee, or consultant has googled me and done some research on who I am. There's plenty out there.

    LinkedIn shows that you do actually work the field and have not faked your resume. LinkedIn is also helpful since many people circulate open jobs and resumes through the networks.

    Recruiters and HR people will google you.

    I don't tend to google people for work, excepting for interviews. What I'm looking for it to get a sense of the personality. Because without a good personality, even the most skill person can become a liability to a team.

    IMHO, a technology professional that is invisible to a dedicated search is actively trying to hide.

    My advice is to have a limited public presence on the net. Enough that if someone is looking for you, they see you appear on the net and that see that Mr. Whoopass is a real person and different than Mr. Wayne Whoopass, serial killer. LinkedIn is good for this, since serial killers don't visit LinkedIn.

    All it would take is a simple vanity domain with a couple pages to establish an identity.

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
  55. like any advertising... by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    You're a commodity. You try to maximize it's value by making it perceived as valuable. Linked in shows you can get along with others and that you're well respected by your peers. A professional reputation must be known or it has no value. Decide if you want to be anonymous or respected. There are advantages and disadvantages to both.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  56. I use those sites all the time by agw · · Score: 1

    I feel so social.

  57. Convenience by lucm · · Score: 1

    For a long time I was reluctant to sign-in to LinkedIn and last year I decided to try it. And I really like it, because it is not time-consuming while being very useful.

    I like LinkedIn because it provides me with a way to stay in touch with former coworkers and other business contacts without having to send the keep-alive "wazzup" email every once in a while. Also I don't have to let people know when I change jobs; it's all in my profile, and those interested will get the info. For me LinkedIn is also a great database of skilled people, which I peruse whenever there is a position to fill at my job.

    To have a valuable database, I have a rule: I do not accept invitations from people I would not vouch for, and I never send invitations unless someone is outstanding. Some of my LinkedIn contacts have thousands of contacts. I have less than fifty.

    As for Facebook or Myspace, I am not interested. I don't feel the need to get in touch with people I lost contact with, and I don't want them to contact me either. If I lose contact with someone, there is a reason. Lack of interest, nothing to discuss, nothing to share... Also I don't have enough time to spend with my actual friends -- why would I want "virtual friends"?

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  58. Wrong attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Privacy dies only if you allow it to. (Or if you know some really nasty people who put your entire private life on the web. Oh well, they say the taste of revenge is sweet...)

  59. Facebook doesn't make you Googlable by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    Well I don't know about LinkedIn, but I'm quite a heavy user of Facebook, using my real name. But if I Google that full name, I get ... nothing (well nothing that actually relates to me).

    Facebook, and any other social networking site worth a damn, have privacy options. They are quite good actually. Use them and max them out. One of those is not to expose your details to external search providers (which I actually think is turned to 'don't allow' by default on FB).

    What I do have is a chat/gaming/IRC alias though that I also use extensively on less privacy-conscious sites. And if I google THAT, I get hundreds of hits. But I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be easy to tie that alias to my real name, since I don't mix and match using those two pieces of ID.

  60. You need a web presence and linkedin is one by drew_eckhardt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A web presence connected me with one founder who hired me as first technical employee in his startup (which was fun until we went out of business) and a big corporation with a six figure bonus + relocation package (but no interesting work to go with it).

    I get a lot of traffic from recruiters from my linkedin account, some of which I'd entertain if I was looking for a job.

    Once you reach the limits of your real-life social network, you really need another marketting strategy for career growth. While not ideal (there's a lot of noise) linkedin is worth the hassle.

  61. Quit being paranoid by sloomis · · Score: 1

    Quit being paranoid, unless you have a really obscure name you should be okay. Here is my name http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=scott+Loomis&aq=f, apparently I make a mean wind flute.
    Oh, I also have a linked in account but you won't find me on the linked in results page that is displayed on those search results. You have control to a point over what is publicly searchable.

  62. It's not like you have a choice... by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

    It's really hard to sell yourself as a web saavy internet professional without a website or at the minimum online contact info. You'll be viewed as a dinosaur programmer if you don't.

    IMO: unless you plan never to quit or be fired, you have to show prospective employers something. If the loss of privacy really bothers you, then withhold your street address and last name until you get a serious offer for a phone interview.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  63. Nobody cares about *you* by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    That is a simple fact - people are interested in themselves, not you. However, to get a job, contract, finance... you need to know lots of people. The more people you are linked to, the more successful you will be in business.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  64. Wow by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

    If I'm looking to hire somebody for a mid- or senior-level IT position and Googling his name pulls up nothing related to his work or industry, I'm going to have serious doubts. Like "What the hell has this guy been doing for his career? Just plugging away heads down? or actively participating and pushing the industry forward?"

    Having no trace of your real identity online in 2009, IMHO, raises serious questions about how serious you are about your career.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:Wow by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      A huge amount of IT work is in no way connected with internet activity... I've noticed some IT folks appear "hip" by having a net presence, keeping regularly updated blogs and so on, but quite a few good folks whose entire career is doing really interesting research don't show up in Google at all, or at best a mention in some university contact database.

  65. 2 kinds of jobs by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    There are 2 kinds of jobs out there: Those that want you linked in, and those that don't.

    Those that don't want you linked in are the ones that research a candidate by the myspace profile and decide not to hire based on that.

    Those that want you linked in are progressive companies that understand the web, people, and what is going on.

    Right now, there are more non-linked companies. So if you want the most options right now, don't link in. If you link in now, you can never un-link due to things like Facebook's TOS and Google.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  66. Yellow pages? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Yellow Pages are more invasive. They give your home address and name.

    That's assuming you have a name like "Dominos Pizza" or "Allstate Insurance".

    For the rest of us with people names, we're generally more concerned about the White Pages.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Yellow pages? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      For the rest of us with people names, we're generally more concerned about the White Pages.

      When I say "Yellow Pages" I'm refering to "Yellow Pages (r)" The company which puts out a directory including both yellow and white pages.

      Much like when I say "Xerox" I am often not limiting my advice or direction to a single corporation's product.

    2. Re:Yellow pages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst. Parents. Ever.

  67. I'm skeptical of Linked In by darpo · · Score: 1

    My past jobs have come from either a technical recruiter spotting my resume, or a direct application by me. I'm very skeptical of sites like Linked In. It's difficult to measure how much they help, and all people give as evidence is anecdotes.

    I am proud of myself for having *reduced* my online profile in recent years. When I was younger, I posted some embarrassing material online that was linked to my real name. It still is out there, but it's buried under many other results, and you often need my middle initial or personal email address to find it. Now when you search on my "first_name last_name", you will mostly see *other* people named "first_name last_name". And I don't have an especially common last name. You have to do a fair bit of digging to find my embarrassing remarks now. Thank goodness.

    Privacy is real. Privacy is valuable. If other people want to give up theirs, by all means, go ahead. But I'm keeping (and restoring) mine.

  68. Be Skeptical by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

    Facebook, MySpace, etc are fads which will die and be replaced by new fads. Look at the recent story about the site Ma.gnolia losing all it's data in a crash. This is the one big weakness of the Internet.

    1. Re:Be Skeptical by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      I've been on linked in for the past 5 years.
      That's 1/3 of the internet's popular age.
      I'd guess that hotmail would disappear before linked in.

      Join my Linked In Network.

    2. Re:Be Skeptical by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I added one years ago after someone said it's a good idea. It wasn't. It's utterly useleess, and they won't remove your info even if asked.

      To call it a 'social networking' site is a bit misleading. You don't network.. you put your address up there and hope that someone might read it. With the added disadvantage that you just gave your email address to thousands of scumbag agencies (the type that email offering completely irrelevant jobs - if I want a job I'll f..ing contact them. Agencies that contact me get on my shitlist), and not a few spammers (I used a unique address for it... I still get *tons* of spam to that unique address).

      That said, I wouldn't (and never have) employ someone that didn't have some kind of online presence.. in IT if you don't you're either lying about your qualifications or are so pathalogical about privacy you'd be a nightmare in the workspace anyway. Linkedin wouldn't be counted in this (it's got no more reliabiity than a paper CV ie. none at all).. I'd be looking for replies to technical questions, questions and answers on usenet, etc. - stuff relevant to the job. I might check facebook to see if the person is a well rounded individual eg. has a social life outside work (embarrasing photos don't bother me one bit.. it's none of my business.. however someone who seems to *only* work is a poor candidate).

    3. Re:Be Skeptical by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      A) They do remove people I know people who sent a polite message via the contact us to be removed.

      It's social networking in the sense that, hey I met my friend and this new person Katie. Let me see if she's on my friend's contact list; she is... okay let me send her a message.

      At the end of the day, it's brought me in more than 40K worth of revenue so I can't complain. YMMV.

  69. LinkedIn is a Winner by qazwart · · Score: 1

    I get dozens of offers via LinkedIn all the time for interviews. I'm simply not looking right now, but if I was, I might look at a few of them. Most don't really interest me (not in my city, not quite a good match, probably won't pay enough).

    However, the real value of LinkedIn is not having a email box full of job offers I am really not interested in, but tracking all the people who do know me. These people know my work and what I am capable of. If I do look for a new position, and I am asked for references, I have up to date email addresses for the references I want to use. Not only that, but the first thing I'd do is ask my contacts if there are any positions in their company. Having someone in the company who can vouch for you gives you an excellent leg up on other interviewees. Even better if someone I know is now in position to hire. In that case, I could probably show up to the interview drunk and naked and still have a good shot at the job.

    If you expect that LinkedIn will deposit hundreds of high paying jobs into your inbox while you sit back and relax, you need not apply. However, if you generally leave a good impression with your coworkers, then you probably want to keep in contact with them just in case you decide that you need to look for a new opportunity.

    I've found that when I registered with LinkedIn, several dozen contacts I use to have, but have lost track of suddenly appeared. I was able to once again get in contact with all of these people.

    As for Facebook and Myspace... Maybe if I was applying to a job which requires me to appear drunk in embarrassing situations, they could do some good. However, I am not looking for a position as a bass guitarist in a rock band, so they're out of the question. What I've found is if you don't lead a very exciting life, you might as well forget about Facebook and Myspace.

  70. Some merit to LinkedIn... facebook? Not so much by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is some merit to LinkedIn. Keeping in touch with old business contacts, making new ones, whatever. It's pretty profession and despite a recruiter or two being an annoyance overall no biggie. Good place to showcase your experience. Facebook IMHO has no real business use. It's too difficult to separate business and personal. Your inviting people to judge you based on your high school buddy with a profile pic you'd rather your boss not see. There's really no good way to handle Facebook. Dual profiles are discouraged too. As a result my profile for years has been pretty empty, no friends and privacy settings turned up. Most people in your network are viewable provided you hookup your work address. Good way to look in on the facebook world without a care.

  71. What's the harm, seriously... by specific_pacific · · Score: 1

    I know a lot of people are REALLY afraid of putting their information online. Companies store it in a database and build a 'profile' of you etc and all that but .. so what?

    Is it paranoia or ego like they think people will actually find their life interesting to seek them out or what?

    1. Re:What's the harm, seriously... by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

      Isn't it kind of useful for people doing identity theft? I mean, the more stuff that's out there, the more questions a bad person can accurately answer, making it harder for banks and such to tell you apart.

  72. I've found sort of the opposite in academia by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    It could be the dynamics of academia versus industry, but I've found Facebook a lot more useful to me professionally. It does have, as you mention, a lot of the fluff and blending of work/personal life. But for the same reason it also more consistently gets updated, and points to unplanned collaboration opportunities.

    Most of my colleagues' LinkedIn pages, if they exist at all, are basically like a business card: bare listing of contact info, and maybe employment history. They don't tend to keep them very up to date, either, or remember to ever log in. Many do log in regularly to Facebook, though, because it's part of their social lives. So they'll tend to do things like join groups indicating their current interests, and update their statuses with a mix of irrelevant-to-me personal life things ("X is picking up the kids from trombone lessons") and relevant-to-me things ("X just saw an interesting talk from Y at Conference On Foo"). For the people who use Twitter, that also gives me kind of similar information.

    I can see how LinkedIn would be more useful if I ever did more formal hiring, consultant searching, or job application, though.

  73. Shameless Plug (Join My Linked In Network) by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

    You can join my linked in network. I'm currently a few contacts away from 7000 members.
    Alex Birch

  74. Re:afraid by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Hi AC.

    Glad to know you're either too lazy to sign in or ... too afraid to use your account.

    The internet is a massive identity kaleidoscope machine. "Boys can't be boys" anymore. All it takes is someone who went a bit too far, and someone else whose Vendetta setting is on 11, and then his professional life is over.

    Years of brand reputation can sink in hours. But unlike leaving small-town montana, the whole *world* knows *forever*.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  75. Same boat, different sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in exactly the same situation - IT for some automobile dealerships. Sales are down, etc. I've also made zero attempt to make an online presence for myself and try to convince family to shy away from social networking sites. My friends have facebook accounts that I don't see, I don't really feel left out because I already know what happens in their life.
    Networking is important, probably a necessary evil but I just don't feel the need - no matter how bad things get - to make a Linked In / Facebook / Twitter / theladders / whatever profile.

  76. Scott McNealy said it best by dabidt · · Score: 1

    I think Scott McNealy said it best: "You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it."

    I think avoiding quality business-oriented sites like LinkedIn is almost certainly a mistake.

    It reminds me of a friend of mine with a great new product idea. He could easily have gotten the investment he needed, but he insisted on extreme secrecy. The result was that he missed the boat, and a parallel thinker made millions off the same idea.

  77. LinkedIn is the best, and even that sucks: by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    Is there a serious employer who is not aware how easy LinkedIn is to manipulate? The "Recommendation" is just one example: in 9 out of 10 cases, when X writes a recommendation of Y, Y returns the favour - often the same day!

    And the number of people in the area of expertise, that are linked to you, is meaningless as well: set up a "Group", have people join, and then, just by the way, invite them in your network as well.

    Still, makes more sense than Facebook, which is better called Abusebook.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  78. If you know my real name... by Shirotae · · Score: 1

    If you know my real name you can find out quite a few things about me as a result of things I have done for work without resorting to LinkedIn (where I do have an account). Publishing papers puts your name on the net and so do various other activities that have to be done with a real name.

    I publish things I do not mind being public forever and will probably add more to my LinkedIn profile soon.

  79. On the mark by rec9140 · · Score: 1

    I think your right on the mark.... do NOT use any social networking sites.

    They are nothing but a leak of personal data and on line stalking tools.

    --
    1311393600 - Back to Black
  80. Get Real by klausner · · Score: 1

    If you think your name, address, employment history, etc. are secret, you are living in a fantasy world. If you've ever used a job board, or emailed a resume, the details of your entire work history are probably out there too. LinkedIn serves a useful purpose in that maintains the "link" between associates, even when they change jobs or email addresses. There are LinkedIn junkies who try to link to everyone they possibly can. Others only link to "real" associates. I do the latter, and find it quite useful.

  81. Re:I believe they corrected this. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    No, what actually happened is that they deleted those last two sentences I quoted above, having to do with expiration. This set people up in arms, because they seemed to believe that suddenly FaceBook was claiming rights to their materials permanently, even after they quit. It caused such an uproar that FaceBook put those two sentence back.

    But actually, those people were fooling themselves. FaceBook was actually doing them a favor by removing those two sentences, because they were misleading. They actually did not say anything of substance at all. They said that their license to use the material would expire, but they don't say when. (They might imply it, but they don't SAY it.) It says IF you remove your material, it does not say WHEN you remove your material. The only mention of "when" is in the preceding paragraph, which says they have a "perpetual" right to your material. The language is clear. And by removing those two sentences, they would prevent users from getting the WRONG idea. That is, the idea that their information is not permanently in the hands of FaceBook, for whatever purposes they desire. The fact is that it is. By signing up in the first place, you have given FaceBook a perputual license to your material. Period.

    As much as I hate this kind of legalese, they DO make their terms of use available up front, and they DO make it very clear that you are giving up permanent rights to any material you may put on FaceBook. If I were a judge, and I were facing a suit over this, I would berate FaceBook for putting in those two bullshit sentences, which only serve to mislead the public. And I would have some serious words with the FaceBook people over their deceptive practices. But ultimately, I would say "You read the terms of use, you read that you were giving permanent rights to FaceBook, and you agreed to the terms. You have no basis for a suit now."

  82. Privacy by dblackshell · · Score: 1

    the subject may seem to be about LinkedIn, although I think it is more about privacy, and LinkedIn was just an example (as Facebook also)...

    Generally it matters more how much information you put up on the internet (about yourself). Privacy exists as much as you are concerned for it.

    Of course too much information can turn against you (impersonation, phishing, social engineering, etc). Technology is the wave you have to catch, because if you stay behind you'll find yourself later all alone on the island called "non existent".

    --
    $god = null;
    if($god) echo 'I believe!';
  83. Privacy is already a lost cause by rbunker · · Score: 1
    Given the massive thefts of data from credit card processors, credit reporting agencies, government agencies etc., any thought that you have any privacy is as silly as belief in the tooth fairy.

    Unless you are an off-the-grid cash-economy false-ID type a la Claire Wolf outsider (which you are not given your job), then you have nothing to lose and everything to gain from being on linkedin.

    This is not to say you can't shoot yourself in the foot with inappropriate postings on myspace of facebook, but a drooling cretin can tell what should and should not go up there. But linkedin is a resume, letters of recommendation and a way to contact folks with warm introductions. No harm, no foul.

  84. This is early days for Social Networking by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    and I don't trust it yet.

    I love gmail but I can see that it is possibly the most insidious Social Networking tool ever created. So I still don't use my real details on it.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  85. Re:no offense..but no security either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as long as you never put in the real dates of your birthday or high school attended or graduation years for example. These are the "security" questions used to "prove" identities. This data held in security-challenged social sites that are continually being hacked. This allows thieves to track your other "security" data from your home town records to respond correctly to questions when stealing your identity.

    Have you not noticed the tens of thousands of people having their identities, bank accounts and credit ratings destroyed? This is one of those issues that is not a problem until you get a call from a collection agency that has been authorized to repossess the Pontiac you purchased from a car dealer in Yonkers. Later the police trace the car to the apartment you rented in Burbank using your Drivers License for ID, and where you had Amazon ship all the electronics you purchased on all those credit cards you opened. Few commercial businessess are set up to completely clear up your terminally ruined credit history. Which, by the way, is reviewed when you are considered for any top-level job. Just a thought.

  86. COME ON! by certain+death · · Score: 1

    It is LOSE, not LOOSE people!!! Who the hell taught you kindergarten English?

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
  87. Lower your morals and you'll be alright, I guess! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the people that I have known that have "Linked In" accounts, are complete moral scumbags. If you have to know someone, or be related to get a job, you're probably not competent to actually have that job. While I know that this is the way that the world really works, I still can't condone it. Thus I left IT when I was 33 and started my own business so I get to make the rules, and don't have to hob know with assholes.

  88. Asocial network sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of these "social networking" sites are of any use for those of us who are asocial. Are there any networking sites for people who do not have (nor want) friends?

    1. Re:Asocial network sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4chan

  89. LinkedIn -yes, Facebook - no by technomom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't heard of anyone's career destroyed because of stuff that got posted on LinkedIn.

    1. Re:LinkedIn -yes, Facebook - no by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't linkedin directly, but accidentally providing information that can tie you to non-work activities.

      I hadn't done a vanity search in years because I had long ago discovered there were a number of people who were more interesting than me but had the same name I do - but after looking this over, I did it again and discovered that two of the top 5 hits are me. Fortunately, neither of them pointed to /.....

  90. My advice by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    do not put personal information on your public networking site for business. Instead, keep it business there and instead if you want a personal networking site for friends to see, create one and do not place your name or photo on the site, and make it private, to approve who can look at it. I have seperate business, that has my real name, a personal private myspace account does not, and a public politics account that does not. That keeps everything seperated and my private and political sites not accessible or tied to my name.

  91. LinkedIn and Facebook can both help by Roblimo · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was laid off Dec. 31 I immediately announced my freelance availability on LinkedIn, Facebook, and a private journalists' email list I'm on. I've been busy ever since. LinkedIn has gotten me the most/best leads, but I've gotten some nice local ones through Facebook and a few from colleagues through the journo list.

    The most interesting project I've landed came from a LinkedIn contact in Austin, TX, who hooked me up with someone in Raleigh, NC, who was doing a health care IT startup and needed writing/PR/marketing help. So I have a nice freelance account doing socially useful work for good people, all arranged over the Internet (although we've met F2F since).

    Don't knock networking. It's the best way to get jobs you might actually like, with people you might like -- and who might like YOU. :)

  92. Trade Off by ChronoFish · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, I've been a software developer for 12 years and I have no expectations that any online data is private - whether it be by snooping, debugging, or automation. The only private information is that which is not provided.

    If your "online persona" is "private" and you want to keep it that way, then continue to turn your back on social networking.

    Having said that, most of my personal contacts are in the IT field AND are well connected. The stereotypically socially-awkward, cube loving, loner computer geek is hard to find these days.

    If you are in a business that relies on word-of-mouth, business networking, etc, Internet Social Networking is a must. If you don't need contact with the outside world to run your business - then keep yourself safe.

    Do you HAVE to give up anonymity in order to participate in social networking? That is kinda the point, isn't it?

    -CF

  93. Strong opinion about this one. by 955301 · · Score: 1

    I agree with what you are saying. It's not that you're paranoid, it's that in your gut you know that connections are important, but our society contradicts your natural tendency to small, close knit groups. If you skip the social networking deal, draw out a graph of your 60 closest friends (or your closest and then the people they are close to... you do know your friends parents don't you? Your dry-cleaners name? etc) you should be able to build up a group of people who complement each other.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  94. Dance Monkey Boy, Dance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    LOL!

    I love your type, putting on airs and strutting around saying that you wouldn't work for me because you feel my online presence is inadequate.

    I have the money that you want. Dance Monkey Boy, dance!

    You can say that you weren't forced and you can convince yourself that you really wanted to dance, on your own time.

    Bitch! Thy name is Owned!

    1. Re:Dance Monkey Boy, Dance. by bitMonster · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs to mod the parent up!

    2. Re:Dance Monkey Boy, Dance. by xilmaril · · Score: 2, Insightful

      dur... I'm an engineer. I have an education that will give me a decent rate of pay compared to my neighbours almost anywhere on the planet. so, like all skilled professionals, I can be a little choosier...

      I know you're just a troll, but I had to throw that out there, because I've actually turned down an employer once word got out among my alumni that they were doing this. not hiring someone because they have drunk photos of themselves on facebook implies all kinds of moral hypocrisy, because odds are you get drunk with friends too.

  95. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet, despite my 18 years of senior level IT experience and tens of thousands of usenet and other online posts, I have successfully and wisely managed to maintain complete anonymity. You will not ever find my real name online.

    I'm actually quite pleased about this as I would not like to work for anyone like you that bases their hiring decisions on whether or not they can find me with The Google. There are much better and more reliable ways of vetting resumes.

    P.S. If I find that you work for me, you're fired.

  96. Privacy? Well, not really. by seebs · · Score: 1

    Anyone who wants to find me can, easily. So far, that's been more an advantage than a disadvantage. My manager's on LI; so's the next manager above that in my chain, and the VP above that. And they're all on my contacts list. When I applied for this job, I don't think it hurt me at all that they could quickly see that several of the staff knew me already. (As it happens, the guy making the hiring pitch already knew this, but that was blind luck.) I went to check this, and had a ping from a former coworker. Good deal; now I have one more sysadmin on my list of sysadmins I can contact if I hear about job openings...

    I've had my own domains since the early 90s, and kept the contact information accurate. I've had my name and address up on the web since we were running NCSA httpd on an Amiga UNIX box, and so far, it's been all benefits, no harm. People who search for me on DejaNews (oh, are they calling it Google Groups now?) can find ~40,000 posts.

    So people know what they're getting into if they want to offer me a job, and that means my time isn't wasted and theirs isn't either. Great.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  97. Only one site gets you jobs by ThoreauHD · · Score: 0

    Linked In is mined by Headhunters for positions. I get an unsolicited offer every week from there. They are good jobs too, I'm just not in the market atm. The rest are for vanity. I have no use for them.

    I also prefer to be under the radar. But it's useful for posting my resume(of sorts) and remembering all the people I meet in IT. It's a small world in IT, and the people at the top will eventually meet or work with each other again. It's not a maybe, but a certainty. So I find it useful.

  98. you have effectively unplugged your career by aschrock · · Score: 1

    As the saying goes, the only truly secure computer is one unplugged and placed in a closet. With true security and safety comes a serious downside - you are not a known quantity to anybody else online.

  99. Re:Privacy? Well, not really. by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    When I applied for this job, I don't think it hurt me at all that they could quickly see that several of the staff knew me already.

    People hiring their friends for positions could lead to cronyism. That's one reason it could hurt you, depending on the company's selection procedures.

  100. Like Linked-In a lot by physburn · · Score: 1

    Not because its a must have service, but i signed up to promote my business. And found, real old colleagues. When you all alone in business, that matters. When you've got no job, and previous experience is all that matter to employers, and perphaps you lie, thats matters. Shall i contact them, some, a cheery reply from that graphic designer girl, i never got to date. A fellow ex-director who lost his job to the big bosses fickle decision. Another guy, didn't know well, One my hardiest working colleagues whos at Google now. Google could buy me out, or crush me like a insect, want a friend there? Identity theft thats the worry. I'd be flattered if someone would want to be me, but the police better be good on it. But my banks, and suppliers have pretty good security checks. But i like it recorded in the world, that i was around, doing my bit.

  101. You can lose if you don't play by adaviel · · Score: 1

    A presentation by Nathan Hamiel & Shawn Moyer at DEFCON 2008 suggested that people who don't play are easier to spoof, as colleagues and family members may be tricked into accepting an imposter as the real you. They suggest creating a minimal presence, if not actually using the sites actively http://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-16/dc16-presentations/defcon-16-hamiel-moyer.pdf

  102. Recruited over the ocean by SuurMyy · · Score: 1

    My best friend was recruited to Canada from Europe through LinkedIn. So hell yea you want to be there!

    --
    The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne
  103. The trick is, multiple personalities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What most people forget to do is to separate their identities.

    It doesn't just mean to have a nick on slashdot that is NOT your real name but to never EVER associate it with your real name EVER. ANYWHERE. AT ALL

    I am known on the internet by my real name, but NOT by the combo of my real name and my secret identity! Hence no fears of having my real name known. A simple google tells me that all the occurences of my real name are solid and highly acceptable, like discussions on support forums for opensource software.

    No links to any endless rants about natalie portman and hot grits.

    1. Re:The trick is, multiple personalities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What most people also forget is that anyone can post any bullshit about you or pretending to be you on the internet. Just because something is listed in google or on the internet about someone doesn't mean it is true. With so many people failing to even verify that the posts of or by a certain name are actually done by the person whose name is attached, all it takes is one well planned smear campaign by anyone who hates you and someone becomes unemployable, even when everything said is completely untrue.

  104. Most of my hits are from FidoNet and MLs by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Back in the mid-90ies I was on FidoNet. FidoNet required you to use your real name but also put quite a few legal restrictions on what can be done with content outside of Fido. Someone at Google thought it would be smart to copy over all FidoBoards into Google Groups. Aside from that there is probably more than one big legal problem to that in more than one country, I try not to care to much about it.

    That aside, the most prominent hits are from my well kept and good looking personal website, so I really don't mind.

    Bottom line:
    I'd stear clear from social networking, as you hand over controll over your data and stats to someone else. Plus on those your presentation is usually bland or crappy. Or both. I would rely on an own website to present myself.
    IMPORTANT: Please take notice that I am a web professional and know the importance of a good looking and well built website and also know how to build or at least fake one. If you can't judge and/or make a good website and have no acredited professional to do it for your then do yourself a favour and stick with business cards and stationary made with a decent template.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  105. I've used my real name on the net for 25 years... by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

    And my address and even my phone number are out there for anyone to see. It's caused me no problems whatever, so far.

    I think the paranoia is just foolishness and a waste of energy.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  106. LinkedIn only by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    With LinkedIn you can get away with pretty much just providing the same information that's on your CV - that is enough to have a decent profile. If you've submitted your CV to any of the major job search sites out there (such as monster), then all that information on your CV is already out there and available to the public.

    As for connections, most of them tend to be "person I worked with" and could be determined by cross-referencing CVs - something you can easily do if you have a database of employment info (again, like the large job search sites or some of the larger employment agencies).

    Also, LinkedIn is very much a professional oriented site - in there you're only expected to let people know what's your expertise and job history and maybe keep in contact with people with whom you have a professional relationship: nobody is expecting you to share stories about your puppy, your latest drug and alcohol fueled wild party or how you found true love.

    The other sites are a lot more "personal" and you're expected to be sharing information you might think is private. Tread carefully with those.

  107. You are only 5 degrees away from anybody. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I can trace paths to many world leaders, classical music stars (Placido Domingo for example is an astounding 2 degrees only from me, as is Dmitri Shostakovich now that I think about it) and several Nobel Prize laureates.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  108. Linked In - worth the effort and exposure by axafg00b · · Score: 1

    Besides echoing earlier comments about keeping in touch with colleagues from previous employers, one feature of Linked In I find helpful is with research for jobs and companies. A head hunter pinged me about an interesting-sounding position at a local university. I went to the school's website and did not find it in their listings. I saw that one of my former colleagues was at a similar level at that school, so I queried him about the position. His reply was that there was no such position open - and he confirmed it with the VP supposedly hiring for that job. So, having the Linked In connections provides a great deal of added support to winnow out the garbage from recruitment firms.

    --
    I think, therefore I am - Rene Descartes; I yam what I yam, an' that's what I yam - Popeye
  109. YOU....are the 'navigator' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who is equally as paranoid about loosing ones identity, I take very careful precautions. For the most part, I feel that LinkedIn has been (somewhat) good for me, in that it has allowed me to 'network' with top subject-matter experts in the field, corporate executives, many of whom are presidents, or C-level executives of some prestigious companies.

    I agree with the one gent - you get what you put into it. If you put in little, you receive little. If you put in quite a bit, you will receive more than what you put in, rather than when you put in little.

    I don't provide my work or home address, nor do I provide my personal email address. My telephone is a cellular telephone number, and the area in which I live is a generalized metro region. I don't use a real picture for my icon, and instead use an iconic figure from a famous comic book (think Heath Ledger's character's arch-rival from a very popular movie). I keep things light, but not too light that people don't take me seriously. I have fun without going into the expense of others, and respect those who ask me questions. I answer questions as best as possible, and those that I don't recognize, I simply state "Sorry, I don't know you."

    It's true. Not everyone has good intentions when connecting with you; many are looking for their own personal agendas, to make more contacts, to get funding for a project - whatever the case may be, I assure you, you are being used for their endeavors, not yours....and you have to take that into consideration, too.

    On LinkedIn, not everyone is your friend, either. You will encounter your current, and most undoubtedly, your past 'enemies'. Some will try and slander you, some will say absolutely - nothing. You have to realize that LinkedIn does not play to favorites, but YOU have control as to how much you want people to know you, about you, of you, and why they should know you.

    So far, I have made quite a bit of great contacts, many of whom are influential people within my industry, both current and future.

    If you have issues with LinkedIn, and cannot come to grips with exposing a little bit of yourself, then go with your gut instinct, and DO NOT join or expose any more of yourself than you feel comfortable doing. If, on the other hand, you want to progress further with your career, you will need to expose yourself - a littl' bit - to let others see who you really are, then by all means...go for it. Honestly, you have nothing to loose. ;)

    If all else fails, use an alias such as 'Hans Gruber' or 'Michael Clayton'. Keep your profile as real as possible, but limit your exposure to the outside. I know that this is contrary to what LinkedIn states, and may be a direct violation of their online EULA, but....how are they going to know? If you feel that you must use an alias, use one that's NOT a famous name. ;)

    I hope that you (and perhaps others) have benefited from this posting. Do what you must, and do what you feel is comfortable - with you. No one is pushing you to join, nor are people going to be nasty to you right off the bat. If being cautious is your prerogative, then so be it, proceed cautiously. But....if the sole purpose of moving forward cautiously is because you have issues with people knowing the 'real you', then you're joining for the wrong reasons, and should not join.

    Hopefully, all of this makes sense to you, and to others, who want to know more about LinkedIn.

    Good luck!

    This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...

  110. There you go on the Social Service trip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything You wrote is jack-shit wrong. I doubt you are neutral in this discussion, because such banter is always the product of multiple personalities in harmonious disorder or preponderance to allow one to elevate a false reality using the other's privilege of fame induction (mod points)

    Why? What specifically is valuable about people who know me? How does who I know affect how well I can do my job?

    Do you have soft skills? Do you have to work with other companies or service providers on a regular basis? It largely depends on what your company does, but there are a LOT of reasons why knowing people in a field is an advantage, and having someone you can work with to establish a relationship or you know has worked with someone (possibly difficult) before is an advantage.

    Again, how exactly does who I know affect how competent I am at my job?

    I suggest you talk to someone who makes a living getting people hired. Its about marketing your self. You could be the Stephen Hawking of computer programming but it means jack if you know no one and only have some very limited references.

    All incorporated companies receive certain acknowledgments to capacity by their employees having certifications and not experience itself; government contracting privileges and the like are not a measure of science but only the delusion of the governing administration. There is this big country out near Saudi Arabia where a bunch of mindless drones walk around a giant cube called the "Kabba." Let me know what certifications you need to have the privilege to accomplish such and look at all the employment benefits you gain for accompanying fellow 'tards on said occupational hazards.

    Really, LinkedIn is a tool to use to your advantage if you need to. A very useful and underestimated tool. The advantages are fairly obvious and the drawbacks negligible. If you can't reason that out then again I suggest you speak with a career services professional to find out (provided you need to).

    LinedIn is nothing more than a shitty cgi on the anti-social trend of dissociative reasoning that persons registering at random websites would build a better "online" presence. This is more distracting from crucial research and study than it is a positive function. Gizmo Project and Skype are proper services, while LinkedIn and Facebook are nothing more than NSA and IRS endorsements to replaceme local estate and community bulletin boards and town halls. Get this formulaic 1980's success tools out of the marketplace and throw them in the same trashbag as NeoPets.

    And if the answer is "it doesn't, but they might want to know anyway" - why isn't it possible that they might decide *not* to hire me, based on the people I know?

    And that kind of arguing is called "self defeating". The vast majority of people will hire you despite who you know rather than not. If they think someone is a tool that's their problem. You don't have to let that become an issue. But if you are a medium sized business, knowing people is power.

    People get their person hired by having extra-marital or interpersonal relations; either by coffee-shop mishap's or The Pillow(sm). You, like many others, are in a vaporware economy that is in constant blacklist by the state; it's not a free market, but a privileged black market by default that everything is unlawful until granted "shadow" access. A good way to test this is looking at yourself as a free man; who am I, would I hire myself, why do I not want to pay myself a living wage so early at myself's new company, and because the economy is going so bad selling carbon dioxide why am I protesting myself conemplating a vast lay-off of non-productive personell? The reason why regulation exists is because the government enters an equitable relationship (direct competition) to the people and in the attempt to regulate and compete at the same time it tries desperately to protect its equity a

  111. Whom... by Velska1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do you know I?

    Do you know he?

    I loose it when people don't know the langwitch.

    --
    Every problem has a solution that is simple, easy and wrong. Selling our Liberty for a little Security is a much too de
  112. You're already screwed by famebait · · Score: 1

    You revealed you exist by posting.

    Linkedin is useful because it makes the job of a recruiter easier. Be sure to include prominanetly any keywords they might search for that you shod score on.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  113. I learned to protect my Identity from Ahhnuld S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the The 6th Day, he protected his double-identity.
    In Eraser, he protected someone's identity.
    In True Lies, he chased around terrorists (and a bed-wetting domestic), using his double-identity.
    In Twins, he found his...double-identity.

    Ahhhlabbbllahhh Blahhhhh'nnnngggggg!

    I strongly suggest that all participants, upon leaving Slashdot for another website, created their double-identity and hide behind it: a strawman is good to have, and I have the robe and wizard hat to enforce that rite.

  114. Abuse of LinkedIn by Headhunters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use LinkedIn, as another mentions, to keep loosely connected to former coworkers, friends, etc. I can't think of one encounter where it directly affected my employment -- but it may be a resource in the future. You certainly can choose not to share certain information about yourself, it's a risk we all take when we use the Internet.

    Most of us that work in the IT industry know very well the pendulum swing of IT HeadHunters and corporations that use them. When the market is good, they'll kiss your behind to get you a job -- on the reverse, they won't even speak with you.

    What I'm finding lately is a lot of so-called HeadHunters are using LinkedIn to send unsolicited job offers and other inquiries. One of them went so far as to send email to both my personal and professional address; another, brazenly called my professional phone line (which isn't published anywhere).

    Does anyone else find this unscrupulous and annoying?
     

  115. LinkedIn through the eyes of a headhunter by QuietR10t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work for one of the top executive search companies in the world and LinkedIn is an indispensable tool.

    In the past, headhunting was very much about who you knew, the company's own database, thrashing through newsfeeds, list of associations, etc., and a lot of cold calling. LinkedIn has, in a very short time, topped them all.

    LinkedIn provides a headhunter with a database that updates itself and that constantly grows without much effort (each connection who adds a connection "expands" my network). It also gives direct access to top executives and allows the headhunter to read the executive's profile before speaking with him/her.

    Through the eyes of the user, indeed, the entry price is a little loss of privacy, but I believe the gains outweigh the losses. A LinkedIn user enters the radar screen of headhunters, allows you to stay in touch with former colleagues and friends, and, who knows?!, lands you a job.

  116. Privacy is a fallacy in the online age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot maintain your privacy in the age of tech we live in. If I want to know about you, all I need is a very small amount of information (your name and city of residence will do) and about $50 and I can get WAY more information than would exist on LinkedIn (think social security numbers, bank account numbers, everything.) It's even legal. LinkedIn is primarily designed as "Facebook for Business" and I can't say that it's a bad idea. Keeping in touch with former bosses/coworkers has its benefits for sure.

    Basically; all this information is already available to anyone who cares enough to pay under a benjamin for it, so why keep it secret when it can potentially help you? Privacy and secret information is essentially not possible with the amount of information sharing that goes on these days.

  117. Watch yourself! by mariox19 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what it means to "lovate" people, but I'm sure it violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  118. It's 2001 by elnyka · · Score: 1
    Not using linkedin for professional networking is very risky.

    You don't have to live in it, but by simply stating your professional resume, some trusted professional contacts as well as several recommendations visible in your profile would help you network with head hunters when and if times get though (which are right now.)

    As for facebook, it depends. I keep one with discrete pics of me and my family, mostly to keep in touch with friends and family oversea. And it is linked to my linkedin profile. Plus I have a hi5 strictly for family.

    I also have a myspace account, but that one will never, ever be linked to my professional career, at least not on purpose.

    Fact is, it was through linkedin that I've been able to network with the main head hunter I'm using now as well as establish relations with other professionals and join several developer groups that I was not aware of until now. So the experience has been quite positive.

    If you keep your linkedin and facebook presence discrete and with class, it should not hurt. Mind you, you should never accept invites from "Hi I'm Wendy and I'm horny lol, u want me tonite?", and you should never have a trace of facebook or whatever on your online PROFESSIONAL presence if it has pics of you in all types of questionable debauchery (not that it is a bad thing, but you know what I mean you dawg.)

  119. Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is a geek site, but I would have thought this was obvious even for the socially awkward folks who congregate here.. LinkedIn for work/contracts, Facebook for pussy. They have both served me well...

  120. RE: Linked In Or Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a IT Professional and an avid LinkedIn user.

    Sites like LinkedIn are for individuals that want to be noticed and be found. It is not only a great great site for networking but also a place where you can have your online vita with references built in.

    You just need to learn to use these social sites without disclosing any sensitive personal information or confidential information about your projects.

  121. Use Pseudonyms by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    On sites you do for fun, simply don't use your real name. All your real friends have cute/clever codenames / nicknames for you anyway, right?

    Create a few web pages under your real name (esp. if you have a relatively unique one), and make sure it comes up above anything else. That way, you control what prospective employers might dig up on you through casual searching. My web pages are just a few things about my kids and a few interesting hobbies I've pursued over the decades... come to think if it, they pretty much look like my resume, except with pictures and links to more detail.

    I've never used LinkedIn, so no comment there. Several larger corps seem to be setting up their own internal LinkedIn equivalents, though, so exercising those might be a good and relatively safe way to move around and network within your company.

    I think most of my job leads have come in through monster.com and other, more traditional, less social networky sites. The nice thing is that I can maintain profiles there, but control whether it pops up or not in employer searches depending on whether I'm looking for work.

    I don't really believe in "computer augmented" social networking, though... call me old-school, but I don't really see much point to Facebook and the ilk beyond entertainment value. They're great for keeping tabs on people you already know, but meeting someone in meatspace and physically shaking their hand and talking about random things for a few minutes gets you way more "interpersonal connectivity points" than having some degree of friend-of-a-friend connectedness or other paper stats.

  122. Planting Seeds by pyost · · Score: 1

    I have little interest in the social aspect, but am now using LinkedIn/Facebook (not MySpace, yet) for business.

    I've got a corporate video production company. I need to get my work in front of as many people as possible. As an independent with a specialty, I'm hoping people will have the interest to take a look - and hoping further that my work plants a seed for a need.

    Considering the marketing approach, and translating that to IT - maybe a consultation with a creative mind to a) get people to look, and 2) plant the idea that your specialty is what they need... perhaps some offers will come your way. Creativity in your approach would imply creativity in your work - which should be attractive to an employer/client.

    Otherwise, I see it as running the numbers - like any job hunting scenario. Make sure your contacts know you're in need of work. Someone getting your credentials from someone they know and trust is much more effective than a cold call.

    ...and I know enough to remember that potential clients will be looking - so I'm keeping it as professionally personable as possible.

    Hope that helps. Best of luck!

  123. I love LinkedIn. by Jonah+Bomber · · Score: 1

    Not because I put much useful information about me on there but because I can find so many people. I'm a recruiter, and I just love it when people put their resumes up. I wish everyone were on LinkedIn. It makes my job so much easier.

  124. Dose it have to be 100% accurate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been dragged kicking and screaming into Facebook. I'm still very concerned about the amount and quality of information people post to these sites. My approach is to be less than accurate. For example, I don't use my legal name or actual date of birth or real city.... I don't post any critical information like addresses, phone numbers... I encountered a bit of trouble at first because people I know wondered who this person was asking to be their friend. I found that a quick note in the introduction message solved that in a way that was not farm able through the web interface. What I found is that I communicate with these people more in FB than in email or over the phone. Perhaps it's a sign of the next generation of interpersonal communication. The down side is that people can't find be in FB by searching for me. I'm comfortable with that. My next goal is to write a FB app, not because I want to write the next killer app but because I'll learn more about what those applications can find out about me.

  125. Get your name out there! by danlyke · · Score: 1

    When I was in college the one professor who taught me the most, and especially the most that has helped my career, told me "publish, publish, publish!"

    I didn't stay in academia, I've never had a peer-reviewed article in a major paper, but I've taken his advice to heart and it's served me well. I get my name out there as much as I can.

    Back in the '90s, Ed Catmull, of Pixar fame, emailed me out of the blue on the basis of a discussion I participated in on comp.graphics.algorithms, and I went to work there for a while. That's my most dramatic episode of making a good contact online, but it's far from the only one.

    I've had recruiters who actually knew what I was looking for contact me (rather than the usual annoyance of keyword matching on Dice), and they already knew what it would take to get me to move (One email started something like "I see you just bought a house in wine country, I can't imagine moving here is attractive, but the client told me to contact you anyway", which got my attention, because he cared enough to find out who I was. Even though "wine country" is a bit of a stretch... I suppose he was being nice).

    I don't really like the social networking sites, and I rarely send invites because I feel like that's something of an imposition, but I gladly receive them because things that raise my visibility have, so far, been good for my career and my life.

  126. I think this sucks. by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    I do not disagree with anything in your post, but I wanted to say, it sucks.

    I don't do facebook, or myspace, or linkedin, or any of those kinds of social networking web sites. I don't have long lost friends I'm waiting to get in touch with, and I don't need the virtual thrill of racking up a high count of "friends" or business contacts on some web site.

    Christ! I thought I left behind all that popularity contest bullshit behind in high school!?!? I don't want to be hired based on how popular I am on some damn web site. I want to be judged based on my qualifications and a face-to-face interview.

    Like I said, I'm sure you're right, but I think it sucks. Now I have to go get on Linkedin and go farm some awesome friends so I can appear popular to potential employers. It makes me feel dirty.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:I think this sucks. by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

      It's like you wrote that straight out of my brain. After having LinkedIn deemed necessary by Yet Another Recruiter the other day, I signed up last week... and it felt terrible. I've resisted the reeking phoniness of Facebook et al, despite being ironically ridiculed by damned near everyone I know, since the start of this appalling revolution in social networking, and now I'm conscientiously signing up to a site that uses the term "Action Items" in its navigation menu? Naturally, since I signed up, a cavalcade of people with names I vaguely remember from my working past suddenly want to be my "friend" without being my friend. I grit my teeth and acquiesce, because more connections make me look good.

      So, I did it, but it's about as sincere as spooning with a hooker. I'm dead-certain that myself and the parent poster aren't the only two who have signed up for the same reasons, and I can easily imagine that the eventual backlash against LinkedIn will arise from an increasing number of users who are there due to professional compulsion and have zero interest in any of its God-damned "Action Items."

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  127. Anonimity by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    I think you place too much value on being obscure. I can be honest in my opinions on line without embarrassing clients, it's very easy to keep your mouth shut rather than air dirty laundry of your clients anonymously.

  128. Linked In Or Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job, however you are correct, one needs to stay somewhat visible, I would suggest a pseudo personality

  129. Had to cancel my LinkedIn account by XCondE · · Score: 1

    I was getting 2-3 calls a week from HR agents and everyone I asked where they got my contact details said: jeez, uh, I guess LinkedIn.

    Mind you, my phone wasn't listed there. They would look-up the company name, call the main number and get the receptionist to find me

    I couldn't find where to restrict my details the way I wanted so I cancelled my account. Haven't got a single call ever since.

  130. LinkedIn is a good site for professional networkin by Foolomon · · Score: 1

    Honestly, after a certain point in one's career there is a greater chance of continuing career advancement through networking than there is using a job recruiting agency. It is for this reason that LinkedIn is invaluable.

    For example, in early 2008 I found out that my business unit was going to have a massive (50%) RIF so I immediately contacted several people in my LinkedIn network. Within the 2 weeks immediately following, I had 8 interviews at 5 different companies. This was, obviously, without using a recruiter who would have had to screen me, reformat my resume (and probably hack it to death), etc. Instead, the people that interviewed me already had some experience with me on a professional level and were aware of the quality of work I perform.

    The trick to using LinkedIn (or LI as it's known) is to have people in your network that you've actually interacted with. Although those who call themselves LIONs (LinkedIn Open Networkers) would disagree, this actually gives your network value since in situations where you need to call upon someone for a favor they are already comfortable working with you and are thus more likely to help you out.

  131. Only a kike like you would say that. Rambam? FU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Privacy is dead only when everyone in the public is on the same service and flooding the private repository into their public function that renders them in such interdependancy on this trademark and copyright records. Making use in private records in court predominantly will render the public dormant and according to statute law will readjust the foundation to that issue of stock and liquidate the estate of every holder for a controlling interest made known by the new flag and regiment.

    Get off your rape horse and look at the facts; you are as idolatrous as your father Abraham the devil. Get back into Noah's arch with the rest of your primates you damned dirty ape.

  132. What's teh point of Ask Slashdot? by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

    I literally can't remember the last time I saw any useful responses to an "Ask Slashdot" question. People post interesting and thoughtful questions looking for help - often questions I've wondered about, too. And I click on the link, hoping to get some useful information. But all I ever see are retards who go off on some random tangent that has nothing whatsoever to do with the question. And I keep my browsing level set at 2, so it's not just AC's and trolls.

    Moderators need to use the "Irrelevant" tag a LOT more. A WHOLE HELL OF A LOT more. So people can read the comments and actually find (gasp!) something "relevant" to the post.

    And yes, technically this post isn't directly relevant to the question either, but it's meta-relevant.

  133. Hey guys! Will you join and befriend me on /. ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow we all have the same beliefs and all. It's like highschool chess-club all over again oh wow! We can help eachother get jobs and stuff: I need the Den of Evil quest can yous helps me? I went on myspace,but Tom wouldn't help so I kicked him out of my BFF list. k-bye fags.

  134. Did you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just admit that you're more familiar with Dolph Lungren than Kevin Bacon?

    It sure looks that way...

  135. Heheheh, that's a good one. by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >So, I did it, but it's about as sincere as spooning with a hooker.

    I feel ya, bro.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  136. Keep on truckin' by Dretep · · Score: 1

    I wonder if I should loosen up on the paranoia a bit and start networking with some of these folks in case of the all too common layoff scenario that seems to be happening lately. What do other folks here think about this?

    I here think there's no need to worry about the layoff scenario and paranoia. Until the machines take over IT administrators will always be needed. Keep on truckin', you'll be fine.

  137. Good question by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    LinkedIn is a granfalloon. Most of the people I really like and trust haven't bothered with LinkedIn, while most of the people who have invited me to link up with them have been people I know only marginally. Very few of them really know what I'm good at, and I don't know much about them, except that I worked with them a while.

    That said, one thing that convinced me LinkedIn was worth a little bit of my time is that almost none of the people in my close association is able to help me find work in my area of expertise. The ones I have worked with who have bothered to invite me to link up with them at least might be convinced to pass my resume on. My wife just secured her current job through a LinkedIn connection. (OTOH, she has been utterly miserable since starting the job, but that's because of a particular personality that she didn't meet during the interviews, but with whom she has had to work closely.)

    Of course, one disappointing thing about LinkedIn is that it doesn't have Friends, Foes, and Freaks. There are a very few people whom I never want to work with again, and when they show up as potential contacts, I politely ignore them.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  138. Calling Mr. Hermit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I signed up for facebook in college because all my friends were on it and I would be missing out on stuff otherwise.

    If paranoia is more important than staying in touch with your friends, then I invite you and your antisocial self to kindly go live under a rock.

    And if your friends don't have enough brains to not post (or not take!) those beer bong photos, then you probably need new friends anyway

  139. Linked In is not FaceBook by n1vux · · Score: 1

    It's good to be skeptical or even paranoid on the net. I say that as a former professional paranoid.

    Linked in has a reasonable default set of privacy which you can raise or lower. Since it's about resumes and professional networking, the default is a little more open than sensible folks would use one rather more personal FaceBook profiles, and that is ok.

    Linked In also has a more transparent business model on how they are monetizing your free service. They are on the give 99% free to build a community for which 1% will pay for advanced access. Anyone can buy access to fuller search results and to ability to send job inquiries - to those who indicate interest in such - to folks without being introduced. You don't have to build a better game to spam peoples friends, just buy recruiters level access. That's transparent, and in my interest - If I need a job later, I will want active hiring managers not in my network yet to be able to find me.

    I wouldn't use LinkedIn for purely social networking, but I don't think I want to give professional references on dating-and-music sites like FaceBook or MySpace either.

    Bill

  140. Costs, Benefits and Evidence by carpeweb · · Score: 1

    OK, I'll agree that identity theft is a potential cost. You seem to think the benefits are negligible while dismissing non-techies (at least senior ones) as "morons".

    Evidence

    Do you have any hard evidence that active networkers in general suffer more identity theft than non networkers? Anything specific to LinkedIn? Based on your post, I'd expect to see a long line of "morons" at the Social Security office and on soup lines ... maybe I missed the 60 Minutes episode on that.

  141. Follow up story by Smuttley · · Score: 1

    I'd been meaning to register to Linked In for a while but just hadn't bothered.

    I'm teaching English in China at the moment so am only interested in parttime freelance work.

    After reading this story on Slashdot I registered two days ago. I gave it my MSN contact list and had it invite those already on Linked In to link to me.

    Today I received a job offer from the company I worked for before I left the UK. They seemed to think I was back in the UK, I set them straight and told them I was only available for part time work as a freelancer.

    They've said this is fine and asked me my rates and to figure out how I'd access the system from here.

    For me that wins points for Linked In.

    Facebook I would never use for career advancement though. I set it private apart from for friends. I even refuse facebook invites from my Students.