Slashdot Mirror


Did Bat Hitch a Ride To Space On Discovery?

suraj.sun writes "A bat was seen clinging to the external fuel tank of the Space Shuttle Discovery before its launch on Sunday, apparently clung for dear life to the side of the tank as the spaceship lifted off. The shuttle accelerates to an orbital velocity of 17,500 milers per hour, which is 25 times faster than the speed of sound, in just over eight minutes. That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds. Did it make it into space? No one knows yet. But photos of Discovery as it cleared the launch tower showed a tiny speck on the side of the tank. When those photos were blown up, it became apparent that the speck was a bat."

306 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. 119V-0080 by Lord+Grey · · Score: 5, Funny
    From space.com's article:

    "The bat eventually became 'Interim Problem Report 119V-0080' after the [Final Inspection Team] finished their walkdown," the memo said. "Systems Engineering and Integration performed a debris analysis on him and ultimately a Launch Commit Criteria waiver to ICE-01 was written to accept the stowaway."

    Poor bat. Can we come up with a better name for him (or her) than 119V-0080? We're talking about the highest- and fastest-flying bat of all time, probably. A real name is definitely in order.

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:119V-0080 by Sven-Erik · · Score: 4, Informative

      The bat has been named Brian.

      --
      - "Every demand is a prison, and wisdom is only free when it asks nothing." Sir Betrand Russell
    2. Re:119V-0080 by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 5, Funny

      >There are cars that accelerate faster than that. Of course, I suppose they don't weigh 4.5 million pounds.....

      And they're not accelerating upwards (I hope)

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    3. Re:119V-0080 by TheCreeep · · Score: 5, Funny

      I say stick a caption on him and call him the lolbat.

    4. Re:119V-0080 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      that's what he gets for taking that double dare to lick the liquid nitrogen tank on that rocket

    5. Re:119V-0080 by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would have gone with Lamarr.

    6. Re:119V-0080 by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Should have allowed the Koichi Wakata (Japanese astronaut) to name it. He was on the shuttle the only other time there was a previous bat issue.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:119V-0080 by nih · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm Brian!

      --
      I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    8. Re:119V-0080 by amn108 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can't wait to hear about Life of Brian. Before and after launch.

    9. Re:119V-0080 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then you have an appropriate sig!

    10. Re:119V-0080 by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      i r on ur rokkitz, awaying ur stow!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    11. Re:119V-0080 by orkybash · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you didn't get the PvP reference.

    12. Re:119V-0080 by ControversialMatt · · Score: 5, Funny

      i can haz spaceflight?

    13. Re:119V-0080 by EatHam · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would've gone with Eric. Eric the fruit-bat.

    14. Re:119V-0080 by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      Kevin?

      (Could be a clash of cultures thing though)

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    15. Re:119V-0080 by bplipschitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eric the half-a-bat.

    16. Re:119V-0080 by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Hey, have you seen Brian lately?"

      "No, man, I haven't seen him since last night when he hooked up with that really huuuge white chick. why?"

      "Dude, you should have seen it. He was goin' at it with her right out in the open, and all of a sudden she started shaking and smoking. I heard him scream 'YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWW!', there was a huge flash, she flew away, and that was that last I ever heard from him."

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    17. Re:119V-0080 by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's not an astro-bat! He's a very naughty boy!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    18. Re:119V-0080 by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how long he held on? Unless he was sheltered from the airflow I find it hard to believe that he could have held on once the shuttle reached any real speed. It's hard enough to hang on in a wind tunnel at subsonic speeds

      Probably frozen in place. They try not to have ice on the tank because it keeps breaking off and smashing tiles... that was the end of Columbia. Still some builds up.

      http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/44545

      Is a technical article "A millimeter wave technique for measuring ice thickness on the Space Shuttle's external tank" from 1991 where they basically built a radio telescope to measure the temperature of the ice/insulation etc. They don't directly discuss ice thickness, but all their calibration curves ran from 0 to 15 mm thickness. So unless they totally screwed up, they don't expect more than 15 mm of ice.

      Most bats are somewhat thicker than 15 mm (err, are they? thats about half an inch). That is probably enough to freeze it onto the tank though.

      Since the ice likes to shake loose and crash into the shuttle as it falls, likely the bat didn't make it to space. I don't think the ice would sublimate fast enough in space that if it made it, it would "stage separate" from the tank. So, if it made it up there, it rode the tank back down.

      Personally, I'd worry alot more about bats nesting in the engine turbopumps than "chilling out" on the cryogenic fuel tank.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    19. Re:119V-0080 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would have gone with "dead"

    20. Re:119V-0080 by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They also aren't accelerating at that rate *constantly* for over 8 minutes... most of them peter out after maybe 15 seconds.

    21. Re:119V-0080 by interested+pyro · · Score: 5, Funny

      And they're not accelerating upwards (I hope)

      some of those crazy cars go at 9.8ft/s^2 (+ or - a little for air resistance) as for weighing 4.6 million tons, there is a car (vehicle) that goes .5 mph and weighs a lot. Its the thing that carries the shuttle to the launch pad.....

    22. Re:119V-0080 by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      And they don't go from 14000 to 14100 in 10 seconds.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    23. Re:119V-0080 by interested+pyro · · Score: 1

      http://www.wittyrpg.com <br>and http://www.youtube.comltbrgt/ Learn how to link on Slashdot!

      this is why we need a "-1 Fail" moderation on /.

    24. Re:119V-0080 by mrdoogee · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Going to space, BRB"

    25. Re:119V-0080 by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      I would've gone with Eric. Eric the fruit-bat.

      Are all your pets called Eric?

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    26. Re:119V-0080 by nightglider28 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except the article stated that IR cameras showed that part of the tank never dropped below 60 and the bat never dropped below 70.

    27. Re:119V-0080 by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Just my Halibut and my Half-a-bee.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    28. Re:119V-0080 by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      A real name is definitely in order.

      Well, seeing that there is no way he hung on for the whole ride, it's pretty safe to assume he fell right past the engines flame...
      I'm thinking "Fireball" or "Cinder".

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    29. Re:119V-0080 by xaxa · · Score: 5, Informative

      And they're not accelerating upwards (I hope)

      some of those crazy cars go at 9.8ft/s^2 (+ or - a little for air resistance)

      I think you mean 9.8ms^-2 ;-).

      Metric: get it right, first time.

    30. Re:119V-0080 by Speare · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    31. Re:119V-0080 by krewemaynard · · Score: 2, Funny

      i can haz spaceflight?

      Yes, u can haz.

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    32. Re:119V-0080 by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      We all know that if they had put it to a vote it would have been named "Colbert".

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    33. Re:119V-0080 by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I think this should clear things up.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    34. Re:119V-0080 by oztiks · · Score: 1

      The GP must work for NASA. You dont expect them to understand the != between metric and imperial.

    35. Re:119V-0080 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your wish is our (edited) command...
      lolbat

    36. Re:119V-0080 by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      So I missed frist psot...Can't we all just get along?

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    37. Re:119V-0080 by teko_teko · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would have gone with Wall-E.

      And he's probably chasing a female bat named Eve who got into the Shuttle...

    38. Re:119V-0080 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And I'm sure you meant 9.8 m/s^2
       
      Using SI units doesn't automatically make you right.

    39. Re:119V-0080 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You worked at NASA on the Mars Orbiter project, didn't you?

    40. Re:119V-0080 by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "Gene Leary" after Gene Roddenberry and Timothy Leary. After all he is the first bat in history "buried" in space as far as I know.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    41. Re:119V-0080 by Mysticeti · · Score: 1

      I would have gone with "Dr. Smith".

    42. Re:119V-0080 by xaxa · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure you meant 9.8 m/s^2

      Using SI units doesn't automatically make you right.

      You fail, basic algebra should tell you 9.8 ms^-2 === 9.8 m/s^2.

      (Using negative powers is unambiguous, slashes aren't.)

      *Triple checks post before clicking Submit*

    43. Re:119V-0080 by Rip+Dick · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Awesome! I'm gonna make it a little bit better.

      Are you?

    44. Re:119V-0080 by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      They try not to have ice on the tank because it keeps breaking off and smashing tiles... that was the end of Columbia.

      The Columbia accident was due to a piece of foam hitting the orbiter, not a piece of ice.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    45. Re:119V-0080 by Fastball · · Score: 1

      *channeling Heath Ledger* ...there goes...the Bat Man...

    46. Re:119V-0080 by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      What should it say?

      WWWEEEEEEEeeeeee---gack!

    47. Re:119V-0080 by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Dwight held a plastic bag with a bat over my head

    48. Re:119V-0080 by Wolfrider · · Score: 2, Funny

      " Hey hav u seen Brian around? "

      " Naw, last I saw him he was taking off like a bat outta Hell... "

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    49. Re:119V-0080 by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Awesome! I'm gonna make it a little bit better.

      Are you?

      OK, I'm gonna try to make it better.

      Better?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    50. Re:119V-0080 by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Probably something more like "WHAT THE FUCK HELP?!"

    51. Re:119V-0080 by Stratocastr · · Score: 1

      >There are cars that accelerate faster than that. Of course, I suppose they don't weigh 4.5 million pounds.....

      And they're not accelerating upwards (I hope)

      Against gravity, which accelerates u at 9.6metres per second, I might add

      --
      Slashdot - I went there to fix their grammar that they're so bad at.
    52. Re:119V-0080 by profplump · · Score: 2, Funny

      You fail SI units. ms is milliseconds, not meters * seconds.

      / Should have checked one more time apparently

    53. Re:119V-0080 by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I would've gone with Eric. Eric the fruit-bat.

      Are all your pets called Eric?

      There's nothing so odd about that! Kemal Ataturk had an entire menagerie called Abdul!

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    54. Re:119V-0080 by EdZ · · Score: 1

      ms is not an SI unit. Seconds (s) are an SI unit. Prefixing it with the abbreviation of 'milli' is not the standard usage. Rather, you should append x10^-3 to the value before the unit.

    55. Re:119V-0080 by erple2 · · Score: 1

      That one definitely broke protocol - straight to double dog dare.

    56. Re:119V-0080 by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      if it made it up there, it rode the tank back down.

      Like a batty Doctor Strangelove?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    57. Re:119V-0080 by sohp · · Score: 1

      Brian has a Facebook group in his memory now.

    58. Re:119V-0080 by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1

      Holy (insert nonsensical exclaimation here) Batman! Your new Batrocket really works!!

    59. Re:119V-0080 by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      I would've gone with Eric. Eric the fruit-bat.

      Is that you, Karl Faustus?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    60. Re:119V-0080 by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I think, "Stella Luna" would have been a better selection...

    61. Re:119V-0080 by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      It would have been worse if you were imagining the bat was Bill O'Reiley. And worse still if you imagined him as the shuttle. *shudder*

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    62. Re:119V-0080 by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      *reads the article*

      Had it been a fruit bat, i think Eric would have been a perfect name.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    63. Re:119V-0080 by interested+pyro · · Score: 1

      I bow to the master of aerodynamics btw, how did your experiment of the difference in timing for a smart car compared to a hummer go? Also, someone else said something about a bat chewing on the foam. First: bat's teeth can't even penetrate our skin, so how will they do on pain-covered foam? Second: It tastes horrible. The bat would not continue once it realizes this.

    64. Re:119V-0080 by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      ms is not an SI unit. Seconds (s) are an SI unit. Prefixing it with the abbreviation of 'milli' is not the standard usage. Rather, you should append x10^-3 to the value before the unit.

      While it's not a unit it's perfectly legal to prefix it with the abreviation (the prefix, actually) of milli. There really is an ambiguity there.

  2. did we run out of targets ? by polar+red · · Score: 5, Funny

    >When those photos were blown up
    poor photo.

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    1. Re:did we run out of targets ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > poor photo. Poor pun.

    2. Re:did we run out of targets ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Me too, so you're outnumbered, AC #27240191.

    3. Re:did we run out of targets ? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>>>>Made me smile.

      >>Me too...

      When two anonymous cowards talk to one another in the middle of the slashdot forest, does anybody hear them?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:did we run out of targets ? by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Only if they're having a conversation about beowulf clusters.

    5. Re:did we run out of targets ? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you.

    6. Re:did we run out of targets ? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Only the blind people with screen readers.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  3. Hollywood Movie Incoming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bats on a Shuttle?

    1. Re:Hollywood Movie Incoming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've had it with these motherfuckin' bats on this motherfuckin' shuttle!

    2. Re:Hollywood Movie Incoming! by rocketman768 · · Score: 1
  4. Spacebat? nah.. by new_breed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spacebatman, now that would be news!

    1. Re:Spacebat? nah.. by Quothz · · Score: 1

      Spacebatman, now that would be news!

      He's Batman.

    2. Re:Spacebat? nah.. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Spacebatman? "I'm Batman. And I can breathe in space." http://www.shortpacked.com/d/20050131.html

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  5. I can hear it now... by KudyardRipling · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where are the animal rights crowd? PETA should have a field-day with this.

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    1. Re:I can hear it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can we launch them into space, too?

    2. Re:I can hear it now... by ben0207 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't even joke about it. The second the die hard environmentalists hear about this, NASA will have to hire a team to check for bats.

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    3. Re:I can hear it now... by Gogo0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dont see why they would, the bat chose to go to space. who are environmentalists to decide what a bat should do with his life?? damn interlopers...

    4. Re:I can hear it now... by Burpmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Animal rights activists and environmentalists are two different things. For one, an environmentalist would be far more concerned with the pollution from the rocket than they would worry about a single injured bat being killed.

    5. Re:I can hear it now... by Gotenosente · · Score: 1

      Hooray for new jobs!

    6. Re:I can hear it now... by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Very true ! And an excellent point.

      I do care about the *environment* the fate of individual creatures (or plants) isn't relevant to this though, unless perhaps if they're crucial members of a vulnerable population.

      Too often people don't see the distinction, and get confused. Hunting around 500 minke-whales out of a population in the north-atlantic of around 110.000 (global population-estimate something around 3/4th of a million) is not a problem for the *environment*. (It's a problem for the individual whales hunted offcourse, but I don't think that's much of an argument, unless you're a vegan and against the eating of *all* animals on principle)

  6. That was no bat... by starglider29a · · Score: 1
    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/20/2036228

    The Air Force Research Lab is developing an Electric Motor-powered Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) that can 'harvest' energy when needed by attaching itself to a power line. It can also temporarily change its shape to look more like innocuous piece of trash hanging from the cable.

    I guess I assumed that they meant the US Air Force.

    1. Re:That was no bat... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Chinese version of that ?
      Or Cuban... this is Florida after all...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:That was no bat... by anonymousmeatbag · · Score: 1

      It did look like a piece of trash, but it was not micro sized. I was less than meter long while hanging on the power line, at least it seemed that long while I was looking at it form the ground. Somehow I resisted the urge to hit it with the rock, I knew what it was the first moment I saw it.

      I saw it months before or after the article mentioned it, I can't remember now. It just reminds me how close US military base Camp Bondsteel is from my hometown.

      So they meant US Air Force.

  7. I'm batman by hypergreatthing · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your answer: Val Kilmer sucks. Your wager: George Clooney sucks.

  8. It's just Wayne Enterprises doing some research by davidwr · · Score: 1

    There are some places even the BatPlane can't go ... yet.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:It's just Wayne Enterprises doing some research by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It's okay, though. Batman can breathe in space.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:It's just Wayne Enterprises doing some research by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, he has one of those devices which filters oxygen out of a vacuum on his utility belt.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:It's just Wayne Enterprises doing some research by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      A Batbussard ramscoop?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  9. Pesky hitchiker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wetbat !!!

  10. ISS revealed by maxume · · Score: 1

    LEO is bat country!

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    1. Re:ISS revealed by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      "Houston, this is Endeavor... Holy Jesus. What are these goddamn animals?"

  11. Bruce Wayne in space by gowtah · · Score: 1

    Did he bring Robin along ?

  12. Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    Where did that myth come from anyway?

    1. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Funny

      And koalas aren't bears, cavys aren't pigs, cynomys aren't dogs, and that KFC you had last night wasn't chicken...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by residieu · · Score: 1

      BATS AREN'T BUGS!

    3. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by robinesque · · Score: 1

      I think because they resemble flying rats. And are as pestilent in some areas.

    4. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by nizo · · Score: 1

      Actually it is a ball of fat with a little chicken in it.

    5. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by eXonyte · · Score: 1

      You have to be careful eating those little chickens whole. The beaks tend to get stuck between your teeth.

    6. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by Lostlander · · Score: 1

      Most likely from here

      They look like flying mice or rats so it sticks.

    7. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Todd, man, you've gotta chew your food.

    8. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's interesting is bats aren't even close to rodents, taxonomically speaking.

      Humans and other primates are, along with rodents, rabbits and treeshrews in the superorder "Euarchontoglires", below the infraclass "Eutheria" of "Mammalia".

      Bats are in the infraclass "Laurasiatheria" under "Eutheria", along with hedgehogs, various ground shrews and moles, bears, dogs, cats, horses, weasels, skunks and so on. Most marine mammals are in the same infraclass as bats: otters, seals, walruses, whales etc. Curiously, although the various moles and shrews resemble bats superficially, they are not the closest living relatives of bats. Bats are more closely related to carnivores like dogs and cats, or even ungulates like rhinos, tapirs and horses.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by Haelyn · · Score: 1

      Look, if you continue your misguided attempt to introduce logic into this discussion men in sunglasses and dark suits will be forced to land their silenced helicopter in your lawn and explain to you the error of your ways...

    10. Re:Bats are _not_ rodents, dangit! by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, no, danger of that. You see logic is the handmaiden of chaos. Just because something is logical doesn't mean it makes sense. And vice versa.

      Anybody with an ounce of sense can see that a bat is nothing but a flying mouse, with a few added features like echolocation. But if you try to piece together the logic of how such things came to be, you will find that bats have more in common with hippopotamuses than mice, which is obviously complete nonsense. It is, however, perfectly logical.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by the+cleaner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Poor bat. Can we come up with a better name for him (or her) than 119V-0080? We're talking about the highest- and fastest-flying bat of all time, probably. A real name is definitely in order.

    Bruce Wayne?!

    --
    Could be worse. Could be raining.
    1. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      This just makes me think of that episode of Superman: The Animated series, Knight Time where Bruce Wayne was... um... I won't spoil it.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    2. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good grief. We provide Spoiler Protection for children's shows? - "Hey did you see the latest Hannah Montana? Lili and Jackson..." "No!" "What?" "Don't you know it's rude to spoil a story?" "Oh sorry." ..... "Then you probably don't want to hear about iCarly's kiss with Sam last night?" "Grrr."

      Back to the bat:

      Probably the same thing happened to him that happened to the butterfly clinging to my car this morning. At around 60 the wind tore him off the windshield and he went "splat" on the car behind me. That bat did not go to space.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by SuperAndy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fluid dynamics basically says that at very close distances to a surface, it doesn't matter how fast the fluid is flowing, the wind speed at the surface is very low, and approaches zero. So maybe he made it!

    4. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fluid dynamics basically says that at very close distances to a surface, it doesn't matter how fast the fluid is flowing, the wind speed at the surface is very low, and approaches zero. So maybe he made it!

      Until he got about halfway to orbit and then suffocated due to lack of oxygen, anyway....

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    5. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by ericrost · · Score: 3, Informative

      The scale of "very close" in air at sea level is MUCH smaller than you think it is. Stick your hand out your window going 65 and see if you can feel a spot where the wind isn't moving close to the window.

    6. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Plus if the butterfly on my car could not hang-on at 60 miles an hour, what chance does a bat have at 25,000 mph windspeed?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Boundary layer (at least at subsonic speeds) where laminar flow slows is barely a tenth of an inch thick. Brian would have been a fair bit thicker than that, so would have certainly been exposed to significant aerodynamic forces as the Shuttle accelerated.

    8. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I also doubt the bat made it anywhere near space, but you're not using a good comparison. By opening the car window in the first place you've disrupted the airflow around the car.

      Not to say there's no wind whatsoever on the car surface, but there will definitely be areas with higher airflow and turbulence (front-facing surfaces, leading edges, etc).

      For that reason, commodore64_love's butterfly, clinging to the windshield, obviously had no chance.

    9. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Fluid dynamics basically says that at very close distances to a surface, it doesn't matter how fast the fluid is flowing, the wind speed at the surface is very low, and approaches zero. So maybe he made it!

      And turbulent boundary layer theory says that at nonzero distances from the wall there will be regions of high shear flow that will not be good for him.

      And if he did fall off, I'll bet he didn't survive his trip through rocket plume.

      Am I the only one who feels bad for the bat?

    10. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by bigfootedrockmidget · · Score: 1

      Fluid dynamics basically says that at very close distances to a surface, it doesn't matter how fast the fluid is flowing, the wind speed at the surface is very low, and approaches zero. So maybe he made it!

      Actually, this is an approximations called the no-slip condition. The no-slip condition fails to hold at high altitudes, where the pressure is low. So it would probably be blown off the surface. To quote the parent in a completely different context: So maybe he made it!

    11. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by whopub · · Score: 2, Funny

      25,000 mph windspeed! That bat must've lost all its feathers by the time he got in space!

    12. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, small flying animals with feathers were called birds.

      Bats are mammals and have fur.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    13. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I somewhat suspect he is an ex-bat, gone to join the choir eternal.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    14. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by treeves · · Score: 1

      Might've frozen to death first.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    15. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      You mean he entered cryogenic stasis, and then might have safely made it back!

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    16. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      You mean he entered cryogenic stasis, and then might have safely made it back!

      Several centuries later, to discover civilisation has replaced one type of monkey for another. No change, to his perspective.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    17. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last time I checked, small flying animals with feathers were called birds.

      Bats are mammals and have fur.

      Never have I ever encountered a more opportune moment to cry "Whoosh"...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    18. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by emandres · · Score: 1

      Yes, he might have clung onto the side of the craft, but that's not to say his insides were not blended into a nice pink slurry by the g-forces. But just in case he did survive, and he's somehow adapted to live in space, I'd like to be the first to say that I, for one, welcome our new space bat overlord.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    19. Re:Name for the bat (Re:119V-0080) by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      ...or gained SUPERPOWERS!

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  14. Welcome, our wonderful bat masters. by Sumbius · · Score: 1

    So we are to believe some conspiracy theories, aliens are going to capture it, thinking that bats are the dominant intelligent species of Earth. (After watching too much Batman from Earth tv.) Soon the bat will return to Earth as a super intelligent genetically engineered super bat and try to dominate Earth. Just like the chimps. Welcome, my wonderful new bat masters. Please don't probe me.

  15. It's a conspiracy by shellster_dude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Contrary to popular opinion, we never got a bat into space. It is a conspiracy by the government to one-up batman. You're all a bunch of sheeple.

    If you're looking for the truth about animals in space, look here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvjgIxuVdo4 [moon bears, the whitest kids you know]

  16. reminds me of those buzzards by trybywrench · · Score: 1

    there's a YouTube clip of 3 or 4 buzzards circling the shuttle at lift off. You can guess what happens next. It looks like they get stunned before they're even struck, probably from all the noise. They flutter down to the engines and that's that.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    1. Re:reminds me of those buzzards by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Ever see the opening ceremony of the Seoul Olympics? They released hundreds of doves, which flew off and landed around the stadium. Including the torch. Well, let the video speak for itself ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDdrSKor-Qs
      jump to about 3:10 in.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  17. Somehow I doubt it by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't how strong a bat is, but I doubt he was able to hang on that long. My guess is his claws gave out, he slid and clawed is way down the tank, and went out in a huge blaze of glory with the whole world watching and wondering.

    Lucky fucker.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Somehow I doubt it by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Lucky fucker

      Combustion, suffocation, and perhaps severe hypothermia as well. I don't think I would call that luck; or at least not the kind of luck I would ever care to have myself.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Somehow I doubt it by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Combustion, suffocation, and perhaps severe hypothermia as well. I don't think I would call that luck; or at least not the kind of luck I would ever care to have myself.

      Hey, some people would go through even more than that to make international headlines.

    3. Re:Somehow I doubt it by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a day in the life of your average resident of Siberia

    4. Re:Somehow I doubt it by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      We all die deaths. Most of them are pointless meaningless wasted deaths that no one will know about, let alone remember. I don't think I would call that luck; or at least not the kind of luck I would ever care to have myself.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:Somehow I doubt it by mortonda · · Score: 1

      yeah, somewhere in the first 30 seconds, don't they have to power down a little as they break the sound barrier? There's no way it could have lasted even up to that point.

      That is the ultimate bull ride though.

    6. Re:Somehow I doubt it by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      When The External Tank is jettisoned from the shuttle, they always turn around and take High Resolution pictures of the tank for future reference and to see if any Foam Insulation came off. I wonder if they could find a pixel or two in those pictures and call it a bat ?

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    7. Re:Somehow I doubt it by msbmsb · · Score: 1

      don't they have to power down a little as they break the sound barrier?

      "The main engines are throttled down at approximately seven minutes 40 seconds into the mission to maintain 3 g's for physiological and structural constraints." Space Shuttle ref manual: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/shuttle/reference/shutref/events/2stage/

    8. Re:Somehow I doubt it by msbmsb · · Score: 1

      Sorry, wrong stage. From stage 1: "To keep the dynamic pressure on the vehicle below a specified level, on the order of 580 pounds per square foot (max q), the main engines are throttled down at approximately 26 seconds and throttled back up at approximately 60 seconds."

      http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/shuttle/reference/shutref/events/1stage/

    9. Re:Somehow I doubt it by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      We all die deaths. Most of them are pointless meaningless wasted deaths that no one will know about, let alone remember

      If you want to focus on being remembered for how you die, that is your choice. I would rather be remembered for what I do while I am still alive.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    10. Re:Somehow I doubt it by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a day in the life of your average resident of Siberia

      In Siberia, bugs eat YOU.

      (This only makes sense if you're bat.)

    11. Re:Somehow I doubt it by random+coward · · Score: 1

      It was frozen to the tank anyway. was dead before the launch from hypothermia.

    12. Re:Somehow I doubt it by mdm42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Playing too much Nethack, are we?

      --
      New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
    13. Re:Somehow I doubt it by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      went out in a huge blaze of glory with the whole world watching and wondering.

      I did that once.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  18. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Batassss

    1. Re:yeah by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      Bats on a Plane

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  19. External Tank by kybred · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The external tank doesn't make it into space. It separates from the shuttle before that. Unless the bat managed to switch horses in the middle of the stream.

    1. Re:External Tank by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Informative

      The external tank doesn't make it into space.

      Yes it does. It doesn't make it into orbit, however.

    2. Re:External Tank by kybred · · Score: 4, Informative

      MECO is around 185,000 feet (35 miles). The start of 'space' is commonly defined as 50 miles. But yes, that's damn high.

    3. Re:External Tank by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      Where exactly do you think the tank goes after MECO?

      The shuttle doesn't have a lot of maneuvering authority after MECO. To stay in space, it fires the OMS to circularize its orbit. The main tank has almost exactly the same orbit until that point, but doesn't circularize it, so it falls back down into the atmosphere. At the apogee, it's very much in space, though.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    4. Re:External Tank by Soft · · Score: 1

      MECO is around 185,000 feet (35 miles).

      No, that's more like the altitude at which the external tank breaks up after falling back down, according to this Shuttle reference page: Second Stage.

      The same site doesn't give a clear answer to where MECO occurs, but the example given in Orbit Insertion is 80 nautical miles (148 km, 92 miles), which is definitely in space.

    5. Re:External Tank by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      To supplement Clayjar's comment...
       
      At MECO and separation the ET has considerable velocity, the exact same nearly orbital velocity as the Orbiter it just separated from in fact, so it doesn't just stop - it coasts both upwards and downrange in a (sub orbital) ballistic arc after separation.
       
      For ISS missions this means the ET's apogee is around 225 kilometers or 122 miles. (Confirmed with a friend who works in the Shuttle program.)

    6. Re:External Tank by sohp · · Score: 1

      Not quite correct. The ET is connected to the shuttle until just after main engine cutoff. At that point the shuttle is in orbit, but one with a low point that drags the tank back down. The shuttle itself uses the OMS to raise the lowpoint of its orbit, but the tank reenters. So yes, it does make it into space.

    7. Re:External Tank by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's actually 62 miles for most folks. It seems only NASA likes to say 50 miles.

    8. Re:External Tank by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      Even if the tank did make it into space, the bat would have long since frozen, and presumably fallen off.

    9. Re:External Tank by decsnake · · Score: 1

      The parent and clayjar are both correct.

      To add a little more information: the ET breaks up on reentry and the debris falls in the ocean. For a typical shuttle mission (28 degree inclination) the impact area is the Indian ocean near Australia. For a mission to ISS like this one the inclination is 56 degrees and the impact area is somewhere else, which I don't happen to know off the top of my head. Neither does my office mate. Pacific perhaps.

    10. Re:External Tank by jwigum · · Score: 1

      That tank burns up during reentry, after it's t minus 9 minute separation from the shuttle. Little guy never made it to orbit.

      --

      Look behind you...

  20. The Truth by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

    VAMPIRES IN SPACE

    Are any of the astronauts oversexed teens? All those '50s sci-fi movies will come true one day, you just watch.

    1. Re:The Truth by ControversialMatt · · Score: 1

      VAMPIRES IN SPACE

      Please don't give Hollwood ideas for another Twilight movie.

    2. Re:The Truth by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Mhmmm interesting dilemma... Watch Twilight or Plan 9?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:The Truth by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Mhmmm interesting dilemma... Watch Twilight or Plan 9?

      Split the difference. Watch Lifeforce.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  21. Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    30 feet off the pad the engines gave out and the bat carried them into orbit.

    Heroic fucker.

  22. Mynock by mcvos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they sure it's not a mynock?

    1. Re:Mynock by dondre_101 · · Score: 1

      yeah...a really small mynock

    2. Re:Mynock by dk90406 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have heard from a reliable source (a photographer I know, named Peter) that the black creature really is a symbiote, that Spiderman placed on the rocket, in order to return it to space.

    3. Re:Mynock by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      Are they sure it's not a mynock?

      "Probably chewing on the power cables"

  23. It wasn't a bat... by Sigmon · · Score: 1

    It was Dracula!

  24. Its final message to Earth by PriceIke · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So long and thanks for all the bugs."

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  25. it's now a dead bat by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Informative

    bats can't survive in space.

    bats can't survive in the upper atmosphere.

    bats aren't falcons.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  26. Can you hear me Major Bat???? by Winchestershire · · Score: 1

    Godspeed little bat.

  27. Baaaaaaats in Spaaaaaaaace! by SaDan · · Score: 1

    Let's just hope that bat uses his newly aquired superbat abilities (after the appropriate amount of exposure to intense intergalactic radiation) for good, and not evil.

    1. Re:Baaaaaaats in Spaaaaaaaace! by Admiral_Grinder · · Score: 1

      I'd rather he used them for awesome.

  28. mad as a hatter by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Twinkle, twinkle, little bat!
            How I wonder what you're at!
            Up above the world you fly,
            Like a teatray in the sky.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:mad as a hatter by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Little bat, clinging.
      I can has space travel please?
      HOLY SHIT, blast off!

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:mad as a hatter by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      Oh wow! Now that's prescient.

  29. Tag story "batronaut" by Game_Ender · · Score: 1

    Title of the post says it all.

  30. The difference in Quality. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...showed a tiny speck on the side of the tank. When those photos were blown up, it became apparent that the speck was a bat.

    And that folks, is the difference between NASA-cam and your average gas-station-cam, which, on average, can't identify Bigfoot if it were robbing the place.

    1. Re:The difference in Quality. by AioKits · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Look out, he's fuzzy, let's get out of here.

      Thanks to Mitch Hedberg (1968-2005)

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    2. Re:The difference in Quality. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Bigfoot also has a reality distortion field? I think we have found a good replacement for Jobs.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:The difference in Quality. by archont · · Score: 1

      Or a Boeing 757-223 from a BGM-109 Tomahawk. *dons tinfoil hat and ducks*

    4. Re:The difference in Quality. by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      And that folks, is the difference between NASA-cam and your average gas-station-cam, which, on average, can't identify Bigfoot if it were robbing the place.

      Clearly this just means that people on crime shows will just sent the gas-station footage to NASA, so that they can blow it up and see Bigfoot. Problem solved.

    5. Re:The difference in Quality. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Sorry - the team at CSI are the only ones qualified to do this kind of work. It just takes 3 clicks on a flashy gui displayed on a window mounted in the back of a hummer.

    6. Re:The difference in Quality. by hey! · · Score: 1

      Actually, Bigfoot is a parasitic life form. It has no bones, muscles or digestive tract of its own, so it can't go shambling through the woods on its own. Instead it wraps its rubbery skin around its human prey.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  31. But why can't the heat tiles stay on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA should investigate adhering heat tiles with bat claws

  32. Damn! by Alomex · · Score: 1

    Is it April 1st already?

  33. PETA shuts down NASA by burtosis · · Score: 1

    Details at 11...

  34. Evolution by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    We're seeing the first steps in the evolution of space-bats!

  35. That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds... by potscott · · Score: 1

    Pffft. My car is faster then that. Seriously.

    --
    I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class, especially since I rule.
    1. Re:That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds... by lendude · · Score: 1

      Not vertically skywards from a standing start it isn't...Seriously.

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
    2. Re:That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      yes but can your car do it straight up? 0-100mph in 10 seconds isn't impressive. 0-100 straight up(not down every car can do that)is what is impressive.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Ha! I bet I'm faster at reaching 100mph than your car. Only takes me about 5 seconds

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    4. Re:That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I can't be bothered to do the math, but basically the fact it's starting vertically takes off 9.8m/s^2 to its acceleration compared to if it was going horizontally like a car. But basically horizontally that means it would accelerate at more than 1 G which is probably much more than your car can do.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    5. Re:That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds... by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Not with a bat attached to your fuel tank.

    6. Re:That's zero to 100 mph in 10 seconds... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      An old friend of mine had his '55 Buick launched off the steam catapult of the Onslow. It achieved that sort of acceleration, in kind of an upward direction. They waited until the carrier's bow was slightly higher due to wave action. Apparently you can get about a mile and a half out of a tumbling Buick before you test its wet-seal integrity.

      If the carrier were aimed straight up, however, you'd have either international crisis of some sort or a well-formed XKCD logic puzzle. Like the one involving airliners and wheels and large belts rotating at speeds to a very high asymptote, perhaps.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  36. Re:Seriously by cowscows · · Score: 4, Informative

    The bat was on the far side of the external tank from the orbiter, about a third of the way up from the bottom. There wasn't really any way that it could strike the orbiter during launch, or that any foam that it might pull off would fall and strike the orbiter. The weight of the bat compared to the weight of the shuttle loaded with fuel is negligible, you'd need a pretty big envelope for your back-of-the-envelope calculations to have enough decimal places to show any effect from it. It was not an unsafe call to essentially ignore the bat. It didn't pose any risk.

    As for the idea of contaminating something like Mars and having it end up overrun with earth bacteria, I guess it's impossible to prove that it couldn't happen, but I don't it's very likely. Mars is more like the earth than anywhere else in the solar system, but it's still very different. You might be able to find a few organisms here that could potentially survive on Mars, but it's doubtful that any would thrive, particularly to the point of overrunning the planet.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  37. Re:Milers by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    an orbital velocity of 17,500 milers per hour

    17500 milers per hour = 28163.52 kilometes per hour

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  38. It's All fun and games... by acedotcom · · Score: 1

    until the space shuttle burns up on re-entry because the bat chewed a hole in it or something.

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
  39. Re:Seriously by evilkasper · · Score: 1

    I would really be surprised if the bat managed to hold on to the tank after the sudden acceleration.

  40. Finally! by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    A new villian for the Fantastic Four--Collossal Cosmic Space Bat!

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  41. Re:Seriously by jaria · · Score: 1

    > I hope they at least did a quick back-of-the-envelope look to see if it *could* be risky, rather than just hoping it wouldn't be.

    Bat-of-the-envelope calculation?

  42. Our only purpose on earth by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    is to get bats into space, so they can colonise the universe.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  43. Re:it's now a dead bat by acedotcom · · Score: 5, Funny

    other things bats are not or cannot do...

    Bats cannot swallow a whole hotdog

    Bats cannot follow the finer details of Neon Genesis Evangelion

    Bats aren't horses, sheep or baseball bats

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
  44. fastest and highest bat by cmaurand · · Score: 1

    The numbers on acceleration are incorrect. The last I knew, the Shuttle went supersonic in ~10 seconds. After that it doesn't really pick up a lot of speed until its out of the atmosphere and most of the fuel is burned up. They are supersonic by the time they get the "Throttle up" command. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle

    1. Re:fastest and highest bat by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      The shuttle does not go supersonic in 10 seconds. It's more like 45 seconds, and the throttle down/throttle up happens shortly later around the time at maximum dynamic pressure.

                Brett

    2. Re:fastest and highest bat by cmaurand · · Score: 1

      the throttle down and up is at supersonic transition, which is why the throttle down. The first shuttle launch did go supersonic in 10 seconds at 100% throttle. The thing now launches at somewhere around 75% to 85% throttle.

  45. Supermanbat by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do you know that guidance system on the shuttle wasn't sabotaged in an obscure plot for world domination that was narrowly averted by this bat flying in at the last minute and guiding the shuttle into orbit only to return quickly to the offices of the Daily Bat and resume his secret identity has Gerald the Bat, mild mannered reporter.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Supermanbat by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      I believe his name is really Bat-Manuel!

  46. Bat, yummmm! by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 1

    Do you prefer your bat roasted or freeze dried? Once the launch started I think those were the only two options.

  47. From Batman to Bigfoot... by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I misunderstood. But... Bigfoot bummed a ride on the space shuttle?

    Holy Way-out Tangents Batman! Is that Bigfoot over there?!?

  48. Re:Seriously by Painted · · Score: 1
    Well, said bat (or it's corpse) would have to survive about a year of alternating freezing and cooking on route to Mars, all the while still clinging tenaciously on through maneuvers and avoiding incineration during reentry, then having bacteria find Mars a hospitable environment. Not impossible for some small bacteria, but for something as big as a bat? Unlikely, I'd say. Plus I'm more than willing to bet that the guys who assess the dangers of "Bat on a tank" actually considered the dangers before giving the go ahead for launch- in fact, the quote above:

    "The bat eventually became 'Interim Problem Report 119V-0080' after the [Final Inspection Team] finished their walkdown," the memo said. "Systems Engineering and Integration performed a debris analysis on him and ultimately a Launch Commit Criteria waiver to ICE-01 was written to accept the stowaway."

    pretty much IS the report showing they assessed the likelihood of danger from a bat on the tank. Remember that debris and other dangers to the shuttle are very dependent on where they are- if Challenger's blow-through on the SRB were rotated 90 degrees, the thing would have survived intact, as several other launches did. If Columbia's foam loss had been on another part of the external tank, it could have fallen harmlessly away and not struck the orbiter at all.

    --
    http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
  49. Re:it's now a dead bat by XPulga · · Score: 5, Funny

    This bat is no more! He has ceased to be! He's expired and gone to meet his maker! He's a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed him to the perch he'd be pushing up the daisies! His metabolic processes are now history! He's off the twig! He's kicked the bucket, he's shuffled off his mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleeding choir invisible!! THIS IS AN EX-BAT!!

  50. That was my pet bat! by thered2001 · · Score: 1

    I was at the Space Center last Tuesday and didn't realize he'd gotten away until we got home. Sorry about this! (OK...I admit this is a fabrication. But I really was there last Tuesday.)

    --

    If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

    1. Re:That was my pet bat! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      OK...I admit this is a fabrication

      Whew, thanks for the admission! For a second there I thought you were serious!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  51. Re:it's now a dead bat by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bats aren't horses, sheep or baseball bats

    In the face of all the potential examples of what bats are not, your failure to pick 3 things is mind-boggling.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  52. Bats....In....SPAAAAAAACE!!!!! by wernst · · Score: 1

    A new Muppet Show is obviously on the way...

  53. 17,500 milers per hour by tripmine · · Score: 1

    That's a shitload of beer.

  54. Re:Seriously by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    I hope they at least did a quick back-of-the-envelope look to see if it *could* be risky, rather than just hoping it wouldn't be.

    You don't know that they haven't already done the maths on that. Poor risk management would be not considering the possibility that a bat or similar flying thing might perch on part of the shuttle at liftoff, and do the calculations long before it reaches the launch pad.

    Alternatively, maybe they have a *proper* techie who just knows this sort of stuff intuitively. "Bat? Nah, won't make a difference. Fire it up."

  55. the next headline will read... by ichbineinneuben · · Score: 2, Funny

    Casket of Soil Mistakenly Sent to ISS in lieu of Supplies soon followed by... ISS Infested by Vampires

  56. Re:Seriously by ledow · · Score: 1

    I don't doubt that you're right, in practice. The point is that in theory, you wouldn't go strapping dead bats to your "sterile" planet.

    So you've made the assumptions that: a) bacteria have to live on other life seeing as they are found in radioactive waste and in parts of the world that *have* no other life (e.g. inside the Earth's crust, acidic hot springs etc.), b) heat/cold kills all water-utilizing bacteria (I think we can easily discount this one given the previous information) and c) only water-utilizing bacteria would be present in a dead bat. That's quite a big leap.

    It's all moot anyway, the thing probably dropped off before it hit the atmosphere and if it didn't, it would be contained to the Earth's gravitational field.

  57. Check out CNN's brilliant reporting on this event by dwillden · · Score: 4, Funny

    At the end of their report on the bat they speculate whether the bat was still clinging to the shuttle when it docked witht the ISS. How they think it managed to jump from the external tank to the shuttle during lift-off is beyond me.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  58. So Long... by QuackenDuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA finds, among a pile of junk mail, a gift-wrapped bowl inscribed with the words "So Long and Thanks for All the Gnats."

    That's it people, the Earth is fraked. The Vogon demolition fleet must be on its way.

  59. Re:Seriously by ledow · · Score: 1

    I didn't say it was "clinging", but does it really take that much for it to be cooked into the surface of the fuel tank, or otherwise permanently attached? I'm not saying it could have got to space with nothing more than the little critters hair on fire, but there would be *something* left of it if it *had* stayed attached, which could just be a matter of it being welded to the tank by the heat, or bits of it getting caught in tiny microscopic cracks. Even if that portion was only 0.0001% of it's mass and quite well done, it's still biological matter that can (in certain circumstances) survive in the most extreme conditions - after that, an anaerobic journey and careful re-entry are nothing in comparison.

  60. Name? by scorpivs · · Score: 1

    ...why not, 'Tiffany?' Anyhow, it's name is Mudd, now.

    --
    There is nothing to FEAR but NOTHING itself; and I fear there is a whole lot of nothing going on. --scorpivs
  61. Re:Milers by Binestar · · Score: 1

    What does that translate to in usable formats? Like Libraries of Congress or Cars?

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  62. Re:it's now a dead bat by Zygamorph · · Score: 1

    Obviously this was the first know case of aBIHALO drop - Bat Initiated High Altitude Low Opening

  63. What? No. We can't stop here. This is bat country by Rasperin · · Score: 1

    I for one do not welcome my new space bat overlords.

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  64. Re:it's now a dead bat by moxley · · Score: 1

    Yes they are.

    Bats are falcons, and falcons are dogs - so get it right... ...Now dogs can't survive in space unless they have a Russian name, and that is only until they run out of food, water, and air.

    I love the scientific method!

  65. Re:I can't believe it wasn't posted yet... by nizo · · Score: 1

    Since it was in the comments of the last 5,000 stories posted on ./ that would make it a tad redundant.

  66. I'm not the bat they think I am at home by PunditGuy · · Score: 1

    Oh no no no
    I'm a rocketbat
    rocketbat -- burning out his fuse up here alone

  67. Re:Seriously by wooferhound · · Score: 1

    If the bat were to still be frozen clinging to the tank, after the shuttle reaches orbit the tank is released and it renters the Earths atmosphere very shortly thereafter. Plus nothing ever reaches Escape Velocity and is not going near enough fast enough to make it past Earth orbit.

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  68. Has Disney optioned his life story yet? by BHS_Turf · · Score: 4, Funny

    I smell a Disney Adventure movie. I hope they're in talked to his agent.

  69. ETs in SPAAAAACE! by ClayJar · · Score: 2, Informative

    The solid rocket boosters separate 125 seconds into the flight at about 150,000 feet (46 km). About seven minutes later when the external tank (ET) separates 30 seconds after MECO, it's at about 120 km, so it's already in space (going with 100 km as the boundary, which is greater than your 50 miles). Additionally, although it's on a suborbital trajectory, it is not yet at the apogee of that trajectory.

    I do not have a number for its apogee, but since the OMS-1 burn is generally not required anymore, you can assume to a first approximation that the ET's apogee is close to that of the Shuttle. Without it's own version of the Shuttle's OMS-2 burn to circularize the ET's orbit, however, the ET reenters the atmosphere after less than a complete orbit.

    Regardless, if the ill-fated bat with the apparently broken wing (or its earthly, perhaps spacely, remains) managed to stay attached through max Q, it could have been the first animal (body) to make it up to space.

    1. Re:ETs in SPAAAAACE! by drerwk · · Score: 1

      ... it could have been the first animal (body) to make it up to space.

      I hope you are not forgetting Laika http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laika

    2. Re:ETs in SPAAAAACE! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      ... it could have been the first animal (body) to make it up to space.

      I hope you are not forgetting Laika http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laika

      Unprotected to space. Laika was protected. Insufficiently mind you, but protected.

      Or at least, the first documented animal to make it up unprotected to space. There are some myths of bovines achieving trans-lunar orbits unassisted however.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  70. Re:it's now a dead bat by wooferhound · · Score: 1

    All while the Fat Lady was Singing ?!

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  71. Re:it's now a dead bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And I fail to see the word 'animal' in your original post.

  72. Karma be damned... by FSWKU · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new chiropteran overlords!

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  73. disney or pixar by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

    quick, someone get disney or pixar on the phone! i have a movie idea to pitch to them about a bat who wants nothing more than to go to space.

  74. Re:it's now a dead bat by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

    Well there goes my plan to enter a bat in the Nathans Hotdog eating contest.

  75. Bat toast by DangerTenor · · Score: 1
    The bat's fate is pretty much guaranteed, mentioned in this article on UniverseToday.

    Unfortunately, holding onto the fuel tank spelled certain doom; it is doubtful he would have been able to remain attached as the violent shaking and g-forces took hold. Although he made it as high as the launch tower, it is likely the bat dropped off and died in the searing 1400C exhaust of the throttling boosters.

    --
    Check out our infosecurity industry blog: http://securitymusings.com/
    1. Re:Bat toast by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      If I had the choice of hanging on more tightly or vaporising, I know what I'd be doing!

  76. if the bat is on the tank... by cdpage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    than no i don't think it made it to space.
    Unless they took the tank to space somehow...

    Or does the tank actually make it to what is considered 'space'by entering so sort of xxxxsphere

    1. Re:if the bat is on the tank... by toppromulan · · Score: 1

      Good point there. My first thought was I hope it was a real bat and not a replica full of bomb or something.

    2. Re:if the bat is on the tank... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Or does the tank actually make it to what is considered 'space'by entering so sort of xxxxsphere

      Long answer: See my comment here.
       
      Short answer: The tank's trajectory tops out at 122 nautical miles, while the boundary of space is considered to be 50 nautical miles.

  77. Disregard all notices of failure of bat launch by NemesisEnforcer · · Score: 1

    Ladies, and Gentlemen (mainly gentlemen, I mean it is slashdot),

    I believe it is time for Science to sacrifice itself in the name of adorability. The picture of this bat is ruined, knowing that it met its untimely demise shortly after.

    I propose from here onwards, all evidence suggesting that the bat died is completely disregarded. The bat made it into space, and is now enjoying life in the cosmic wind. That is all we need to know.

  78. If it was a girl bat by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would have named her "Misty".

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  79. Re:Check out CNN's brilliant reporting on this eve by tsalmark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uhm, it's a CNN reporter, they don't actually think, never have and probably never will.

  80. And the radio was playing... by tracerbb · · Score: 1

    Like a bat out of hell Ill be gone gone gone
    Like a bat out of hell Ill be gone when the morning comes
    When the day is done
    And the sun goes down
    And the moonlights shining through
    Then like a sinner before the gates of heaven
    I'll come crawling on back to you

  81. Re:Seriously by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    I wonder why you got modded Troll.

    Send a mission to Mars one week, find the next week that it's overrun by heat-loving bacteria that spread like mad and cover the planet. It's not impossible, and then where would our search for the origins of life be?

    You've obviously never been to Mars; it's not a place for heat lovers. And it's becoming quite apparent that nothing lives there. Covering Mars with bacteria or lichens or kudzu or something would be doing it a big favor. In fact it would be a significant accomplishment for humanity during this brief time while we're still able to launch crap into space. If we manage to ignite Mars with its own biosphere, in a billion years the germs will evolve into intelligent bats.

  82. New Mascot by loocas · · Score: 1

    We now know the terrible cost of our scientific endeavors. NASA should adorn every future space shuttle with an image of a bat. NASA should adopt it as their mascot, lest we forget.

  83. Re:Seriously by BMonger · · Score: 1

    As for the idea of contaminating something like Mars and having it end up overrun with earth bacteria, I guess it's impossible to prove that it couldn't happen, but I don't it's very likely. Mars is more like the earth than anywhere else in the solar system, but it's still very different. You might be able to find a few organisms here that could potentially survive on Mars, but it's doubtful that any would thrive, particularly to the point of overrunning the planet.

    I hope you don't have to eat those words when our giant bat overlords come back down in 30 years.

  84. Re:it's now a dead bat by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    Shows you what you know...

    Fact #1: Bats = bugs

    and what group of species seems to be able to survive anything? Huh?

  85. Fear and Loathing in Space by jadin · · Score: 3, Funny

    We can't stop here! This is bat country!

  86. Re:Seriously by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mars is more like the earth than anywhere else in the solar system

    Not to nit-pick, but I would argue that the upper atmosphere of Venus is more Earth-like than the surface of Mars. At a certain altitude, Venus has a similar pressure and temperature to Earth, with the majority of the atmosphere being made up of CO2. Supposedly, a human could survive there with only a respirator and something to protect against acid rain, the same can hardly be said for Mars.

  87. Re:Check out CNN's brilliant reporting on this eve by dwillden · · Score: 1

    True. So very true.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  88. OT: Your sig by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!

    Wow, you're treading on thin ice here. I mean there are some things that should never be made fun of. Do you realize how many people could take offense at this "joke"? People could be screaming "blasphemy" and worse! I'm personally not offended, but I think a lot of people wouldn't be so tolerant. I think you are running the risk of creating hatred and even violence with this kind of mockery.

    I mean, implying that the Creator of the Universe doesn't use Emacs? That's harsh... where's your sense of decorum and respect for other people's religions?!

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  89. Vampires! by DirkK · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that there are vampires on the ISS now?

    1. Re:Vampires! by Merlinator · · Score: 1

      Read this. It'll freak you out. Someone has known about this all along. http://drmcninja.com/page.php?pageNum=1&issue=11

  90. If the bat is orbiting by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    It could make for some pretty funny conversation in a few decades when the bat is forgotten.

    [spoken in Chinese] Hey Captain - look what I see! A bat! Seriously! right next to us! Look!

    (dead bat)

    Amazing - how can a bat fly this high? Let's do an EV and collect him.

    OR:

    Frozen bat carcass, travelling at 17,000 mph slams head on into spaceship travelling 17,000 mph, resulting in an explosion visible from the ground. yay.

    "Mommy, daddy! Look at the fireworks! Pretty!"

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:If the bat is orbiting by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      It could make for some pretty funny conversation in a few decades when the bat is forgotten.

      [spoken in Chinese] Hey Captain - look what I see! A bat! Seriously! right next to us! Look!

      There's gotta be some all your bases belonging to us joke somewhere....

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  91. Re:OT: Your sig by Splab · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the creator did use Emacs it would come with a decent text editor.

  92. Re:it's now a dead bat by ubercam · · Score: 1

    Whoosh...

  93. one small step for bruce... by abonstu · · Score: 1

    ...one giant leap for bat kind.

  94. Bats leaving by Narpak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bye and thanks for all the insects?

  95. Re:Seriously by cowscows · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I had not heard anything like that, but I will look for more information about it. Thanks.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  96. Re:OT: Your sig by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ostensibly, yes. Emacs and Lisp. In reality, God http://xkcd.com/224/

  97. also noted by xmousex · · Score: 1

    the external fuel tank is lined with orange shag carpet.

  98. Re:Check out CNN's brilliant reporting on this eve by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    These are the same clueless bastards that reported the Columbia was going 18 times the speed of light during its fatal re-entry a few years back, so frankly it doesn't surprise me.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  99. Re:OT: Your sig by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could God create an editor that sucks so badly even He couldn't use it?

    (joke purposefully phrased to be editor-agnostic)

  100. Re:it's now a dead bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, Fry, I love how you can *REMEMBER TWO THINGS*

  101. The Count says... by neiras · · Score: 1

    One two three, spread out the cape
    One two three, twirl round the floor
    One two three, left foot you swing
    One two three, then start to sing
    One two three, loud as you please
    One two three, counting with ease
    One two three, doing the batty bat!

    Batty batty bat batty batty bat batty batty bat
    One two three count!
    Batty batty bat batty batty bat batty batty bat
    Dance with me doing the batty bat!

    Ah ah ah!

  102. Re:it's now a dead bat by Sumbius · · Score: 1

    And 3million years from now, alien archaeologist discovers a frozen corpse of the bravest little astronaut of planet Earth. The bat far away from his home. At least they can have some interesting arguments on how it ended up in there.

  103. Re:OT: Your sig by Stratocastr · · Score: 2, Funny

    To answer your question, No.

    Microsoft beat god to it in 2007..

    --
    Slashdot - I went there to fix their grammar that they're so bad at.
  104. Re:it's now a dead bat by Haoie · · Score: 1

    Pointing out that it's dead, well, it's a bit obvious.

    Wrong place at the wrong time, and bam, you're both dead and you make international headlines.

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
  105. They got the name all wrong by bradorsomething · · Score: 1

    Name it Ash.

  106. oblig by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    beautiful plumage...

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  107. Re:it's now a dead bat by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    no no no... it's a BIHANO...
    Bat
    Initiated
    High Altitude
    NO
    Opening

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  108. From the bat's point of view? by kiehlster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone have any idea what it was like for the bat before it likely lost its hold and fell into the flaming rockets? If it got near or above the speed of sound, what would the bat be thinking? Do they just perceive a wall or does the bat see nothing at all? Just wondering what was going through its mind.

    1. Re:From the bat's point of view? by OldBus · · Score: 2, Funny
      A quote from motorcyclist Barry Sheen seems an appropriate reply.

      After a serious crash he was asked what went through his mind at the time. He replied, "My arse."

  109. Gone when the morning comes by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one thinking that this would be a great concept for a Meatloaf Records cover art?

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
  110. oblig Bowling for soup by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    ...Top Secret was funny, too...but he sucked as Batman...

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  111. Not by accident by anothy · · Score: 1

    They tell you this bat just sorta showed up, but really it was planned all along. The bat is a planned counter-measure: he's going after that spider they lost last year! NASA needs to take the spider out before it learns how to work the bag of tools it stole.

    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  112. Re:Seriously by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    You just need a big blue guy although you might have to remind him to set up the air bubble.

  113. Re:OT: Your sig by Repton · · Score: 1

    Maybe god uses emacs in

    viper-mode

    :-)

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  114. Where does he get such wonderful toys? by notcreative · · Score: 1

    I think they took it literally when NASA said they would "Go to bat" for the space program

  115. Re:Seriously by vakond1 · · Score: 1

    Well, we could still try contaminating Mars with lawyers....tougher than most bacteria, I can tell you.

  116. Re:Check out CNN's brilliant reporting on this eve by jwigum · · Score: 1

    It's the media. They don't know the tank separates and burns up on reentry.

    --

    Look behind you...

  117. A tribute... by KILNA · · Score: 1
    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  118. Re:OT: Your sig... I'm suspecting.... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Bat Attack... But, then that would be...

    Fowl play. But, fi the bat could be smelled, there might be some foul play in play...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  119. Re:it's now a dead bat by lorelorn · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, I'm a bat!

  120. Bats on a Shuttle by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    It's the sequel to 'Snakes on a Plane' it's 'Bats on a Shuttle'.

  121. Re:Milers by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    1/23.8 Libaies of Congess or (17+i17) Cas

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  122. Re:Seriously by novas007 · · Score: 1

    Also, for landing on Mars, NASA takes some precautions against contamination. This page talks a little bit about the bio-barrier around Phoenix's arm: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4265740.html?page=7&series=35

    --
    To smash a single atom, all mankind was intent / Now any day the atom may return the compliment
  123. Eve? by Eelkonio · · Score: 1

    Well, this bat has proven that he ain't no Wall-E.

  124. Doubtless by dugeen · · Score: 1

    Gone to join the sapient zats which soar through airless space, slanting their metal wings to winds of light. May Issek bless you, Fritz Leiber

  125. Re:OT: Your sig by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    Given there are so many of them on Wikipedia, I'd have to say the answer is "yes".

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  126. holy crap by dotar · · Score: 1

    It's clearly gone after the missing spider!

  127. Publicity Stunt? by i*rod · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one (i've noticed) has suggested "Meatloaf" as a moniker for the diminutive rocketeer. Perhaps the readership is too young to remember "Bat out of Hell"; circa 1977. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_Out_of_Hell Could Meat be contemplating "Bat out of Hell IV"?

  128. A new metric by Da3vid · · Score: 1

    So, the shuttle has 30 some odd million horsepower... but perhaps the question we should be asking: how much batpower does it have? One, apparently.

  129. It's okay... by EvilBenFranklin · · Score: 1

    "I'm Batman, and I can breathe in space."

    --
    FOOLS! I will destroy you ALL! ...Ask me how!
  130. Re:OT: Your sig by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Microsoft beat god to it in 2007..

    More like 1981. Ever use edlin?

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.