Slashdot Mirror


Battlestar Galactica Hosted At the UN

TheDopp writes "The United Nations hosted the cast and crew of Battlestar Galactica Tuesday evening in New York. Clips of the show were shown as discussion points during the event, touching on the morality of Suicide Bombers in war, Abortion and the use of torture on enemies of the state. At one point during the event an attendee mentions 'the "Old Man" launched into a passionate speech about casting off the idea of race as a cultural determinant, and said we were one race, the human race. His voice echoed throughout the chamber growing louder until — I kid you not — he was yelling, "So Say We All," and the crowd answered right back. Hell, even I yelled it, I was in the fraking United Nations with Adama, the gods themselves could not have stopped this moment.' The full video of the event is located on the UN website."

252 comments

  1. Video by Imagix · · Score: 5, Informative

    RealMedia? People still use RealMedia?

    1. Re:Video by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Real Media if FRACKED up.

      So say we all?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Video by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      I'd _love_ to watch this, but even VLC wouldn't play it. This is ridiculous.

      RealMedia? Seriously?

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    3. Re:Video by pdabbadabba · · Score: 5, Funny

      SO SAY WE ALL!

    4. Re:Video by TheDopp · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm fairly certain the use of RealMedia by the UN is proof they ignore human rights vi*BUFFERING*olations.

    5. Re:Video by marcansoft · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a stupid playlist. Try opening the file as text, copying the first line, and playing it with mplayer:
      mplayer rtsp://157.150.195.57:554/ondemand/specialevents/2009/se090317pm.rm?cloakport=80,554,7070

      The quality is substantially inferior to YouTube though.

    6. Re:Video by mcnazar · · Score: 0, Redundant

      SO SAY WE ALL!!

    7. Re:Video by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Funny

      SO SAY ...buffering... WE ...buffering... ALL!

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    8. Re:Video by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      you tube link - and no I don't Rick Roll - that's how I roll.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSFDrOxWCXY

    9. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mplayer -playlist http://webcast.un.org/ramgen/ondemand/specialevents/2009/se090317pm.rm

    10. Re:Video by Timosch · · Score: 1

      Evil never perishes from our planet, y'know...

    11. Re:Video by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Give them a break, they UN-nazied the world from Charlie Chaplin's nazi regime and his evil nazi dinosaurs.

    12. Re:Video by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Computers on the Galactica aren't networked for a reason.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:Video by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Screw it. THIS is the video that says it all to me, with regard to world relations. If this doesn't make you smile...nothing will.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Video by ColonelSplendid · · Score: 0, Redundant

      SO SAY WE ALL!

      --
      Oh, so something witty should go here then eh?
    15. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this have...BUFFERING...before and all this will...BUFFERING...again.

    16. Re:Video by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm pretty sure, they ignore human rights, or they violate them. Not both.

      Double negation, BiTCH! ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    17. Re:Video by Rip+Dick · · Score: 1

      If this doesn't make you smile...nothing will.

      I submit this.

    18. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they don't have the time to care, they areBUFFERING

    19. Re:Video by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      It's only inferior because some idiot picked horrible quality settings.

      I used to love streaming some .rm back in the day, cause it used to have such a high quality to size ratio....

    20. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly don't use RealMedia to watch my BSG downloads.

    21. Re:Video by RDW · · Score: 4, Funny

      'RealMedia? People still use RealMedia?'

      "You'll see things here that look odd, even antiquated, to modern eyes, like phones with cords, awkward manual valves, media codecs that, well, barely deserve the name..."

    22. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need a " Score: 6, Undeniable truth" for the parent post...

    23. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what?!?

    24. Re:Video by geekoid · · Score: 1

      WE SAY ALSO!

      wait.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:Video by deviceb · · Score: 1

      wtf! just when you thought it was really dead & gone..
      -a .RM file fresh from our government, still stuck in 1990

      --
      Kill your TV
    26. Re:Video by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Anyone who tries to tell you that all nations and races are equal are doing so for their own advantage.

      Really? I'd think that if we hadn't given equal rights to African Americans, we might have an "advantage" in the sense you're describing. After all, slaves could be useful.

      No, the main advantage is a moral one -- that we aren't complete barbarians.

      A world without hate is an imprisoned world that I sure wouldn't want to live in.

      How so?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    27. Re:Video by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Really? How about someone who says that some nations are races are inferior, worthy of one's contempt, that their assets should be seized and they themselves possibly eliminated for the greatest good? Sounds familiar?

    28. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are in the US, and since this took place in the US, I assume you are, you should know that the UN is not your government so this is not fresh from your gov't. Your government does not even support the UN except paying lipservice. The money they should have been paying in is years behind, dating back into the Clinton admin and continuing through Bush.

    29. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do at the UN, If only you knew the full extent of the implementation.

    30. Re:Video by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Cause the only way you remove the hate is through lobotomies or chemical engineering.

    31. Re:Video by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Really? I'd think that if we hadn't given equal rights to African Americans, we might have an "advantage" in the sense you're describing. After all, slaves could be useful."

      Can we please quit calling them African Americans. We're all Americans, plain and simple.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    32. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm European American

    33. Re:Video by moniker127 · · Score: 1

      I'm white. Out president is black. Mohammed is arab. Jet Li is asian. Just call people what they are- its less offensive to not walk on eggshells all the fucking time.

    34. Re:Video by NateTech · · Score: 1

      He will probably avoid a number of places, including:

      Somalia
      Iraq
      Afghanistan
      Democratic Republic of Congo
      Côte d'Ivoire
      Pakistan
      Burundi
      Sri Lanka
      Haiti
      Chad
      Liberia

      There are still places in the world where it's likely if Matt showed up and started dancing, the people there would kill him, and certainly wouldn't want him dancing there.

      The video's great, and it shows that the MAJORITY of nations are filled with sane, normal, people -- but we mustn't act like the world's problems are always fixed by something as simple as dancing.

      There's another piece to this story (pun intended)... once the marketing money from the gum company dries up, he's just another dude who can't afford to go all those places.

      If travel were magnitudes less expensive than it still is today (although we're an amazingly mobile species on the planet already, of course - yay aviation!), things might be a lot more tolerant... or a lot worse. Hard to say, but history shows "worse" in most cases...

      You and I might smile at his video, but we'll likely never be able to EXPERIENCE it in our lifetimes.

      Even less likely in the places listed above.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    35. Re:Video by Smuttley · · Score: 1

      This isn't double negation.

      Who taught you grammar? BITCH!

    36. Re:Video by lpq · · Score: 1

      Worked for me....
      What, you got a problem with an older vid format?

      Kids.

    37. Re:Video by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      WOOOOSH (scroll down to the end of the checklist)

      Oh, and the parent post of my post above IS double negation/negative.

      They *ignore* human rights *violations*.
      = They *ignore* ... *violations*.
      = They do not violate.

      Else, they would ignore human rights. Or they would violate them.

      Point still stands. BiTCH.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    38. Re:Video by damburger · · Score: 1

      Why do I have the feeling that, despite you probably being a third his age, you wouldn't say that to Edward James Olmos' face?

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    39. Re:Video by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Go and learn some english kid. There are not two negatives in that sentence.

    40. Re:Video by Squeeonline · · Score: 0

      We are the Knights that say Ni!

      Ni ni ni ni!!!!

    41. Re:Video by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I do call them Americans, except when I need to make a point that relies on race. If you replace "African Americans" with "Americans" in my post, does it make as much sense?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  2. Quick....! by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone send in some Cylons!!!

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Quick....! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is the UN. They'd just put the Cylons in charge of a commission on human rights in the 12 colonies.

    2. Re:Quick....! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who was that UN official with the really attractive blond in the red dress?

    3. Re:Quick....! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 3, Funny

      For the UN, that would be a step up.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    4. Re:Quick....! by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone must not have told the UN that the first scene of the series involved the betrayal and murder of a diplomat.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Quick....! by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

      Gaius is that you?

    6. Re:Quick....! by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Send in the Cylons? This is the UN. They're all toasters.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    7. Re:Quick....! by Hoski · · Score: 1

      HA HA HA. Such insight.

  3. Tricky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this feeling? Warmth for humanity? Disgust?

    Please post this sorta things well past 10pm when I am all nice and sauced.

  4. Re:amatures by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    I'm using Firefox on Windows, as (if my own stats for tech sites show) I'm sure a good 70% of the people browsing this site are, and this page looks fine.

    Maybe you should try clearing your cookies.

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  5. I must have dozed off. Did something happen? by macbeth66 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ::yawn::

  6. /me shakes head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Seriously? The cast of a fucking space opera gets to address the UN? And the UN listens? Please tell me you're making it up.

    1. Re:/me shakes head by Evangelion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, they took some time out of their busy schedule of meetings with Bono to host BSG. At least it's a step up.

    2. Re:/me shakes head by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      You can't make this shit up!

    3. Re:/me shakes head by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Informative

          Well, it wasn't quite that. Watch the video. It's 100 students and a few members of the UN listening to a couple members of the BSG cast.

          They were simply using the building, which added the illusion of authority to the event. If it had happened in any other venue, it wouldn't have been news.

          It does give the impression that they were addressing the UN General Assembly, which simply wasn't true.

          The event was more of a photo op.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:/me shakes head by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Yah, they shoulda been picking their NCAA brackets like Obama.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:/me shakes head by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Next week, the UN will cease the IP rights for BSG, then Obama will slap a 90% excise tax on the income of anyone refusing to continue with the show and all scrips will be approved by the Human Rights Commitee

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:/me shakes head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can't be bothered registering .but i wold love to take six to a debate..And baltar will redeem himself i'm sure..haha!

  7. Did they mention by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That the whole story is essentially one 4 season long dissertation on the "wages of sin" and even "generational sin?" The recurring sins of sloth and bigotry finally keep coming back to haunt the human race. Sloth lead to two of the colonies being treated horribly until the Cylons could be created as a worker class. The Cylons eventually realized that they were slaves and revolted, and that pattern has repeated itself at least once already.

    In a dark, twisted way, the series is more religious and conservative than the original one. A lot of fans of the original hate that because it's more like a Hobbesian/Calvinist take on human nature, sin, God's judgment, etc. with the human race not being portrayed as noble, but having its own sins come back to haunt it. As a Christian, I find it a very refreshing show in that it has a brutally realistic take on human nature, sin and other factors that are usually ignored by people looking to create a simplistic "good guys in white, bad guys in black" kind of moral dichotomy.

    1. Re:Did they mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just me but didn't the Cylons in the original series seem not all bad? I seem to remember the cylon leader getting overthrown by another cylon leader with plans to make peace with the Colonials... and giving Baltar command of a whole ship to do it, hence leading to their long term predicament.

    2. Re:Did they mention by Yvan256 · · Score: 0

      I thought it was "good guys with Macs, bad guys with Windows PCs".

    3. Re:Did they mention by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No offense, but I found the moralizing tiresome and contrived. Too many dumb moral lessons like "racism == bad" or "there are no good guys in the world". A lot of random garbage apparently intended to confuse the audience and/or inject a simulation of moral ambiguity, eg, the five hidden cylons.

      A common subplot is the cardboard character that has a surprising revelation and turns into a different cardboard character.

      My take is that while the new series does have a little more moral depth to it than the old series does, it's not that impressive. Your talk about Hobbesian/Calvinist viewpoint on human nature and "sin" underscores that. This is obsolete morality. People aren't really like that and fundamentally it is a stereotype just as misdirected and limited as the white hat/black hat story you decry.

    4. Re:Did they mention by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you had the "racism == bad" lesson. If anything the story with the doctor was more of "racism == persistent." And just because you believe/pretend it's not there, doesn't mean it's not. It also shows that if you ignore the warning signs you are complacent.

    5. Re:Did they mention by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You should have watched The Last Frakkin' Special on Monday night. Ronald Moore made it clear that no one was totally good or bad. Everyone in the series had their good points along with their bad. It's the way I've been watching the show since the first season when I saw that Gaius Baltar was neither good or bad.

      I don't actually see much moralizing in the show. To me it's just a bunch of people trying to make do with a very difficult situation. And then out of nowhere people die for no good reason! Like Billy.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    6. Re:Did they mention by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      Racism == bad is just a dumb moral lesson? Sloth and bigotry aren't common real-world problems? Gosh. I must live on the wrong planet.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    7. Re:Did they mention by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 0

      No offense, but I found the moralizing tiresome and contrived. Too many dumb moral lessons like "racism == bad" or "there are no good guys in the world". A lot of random garbage apparently intended to confuse the audience and/or inject a simulation of moral ambiguity, eg, the five hidden cylons.

      A common subplot is the cardboard character that has a surprising revelation and turns into a different cardboard character.

      My take is that while the new series does have a little more moral depth to it than the old series does, it's not that impressive. Your talk about Hobbesian/Calvinist viewpoint on human nature and "sin" underscores that. This is obsolete morality. People aren't really like that and fundamentally it is a stereotype just as misdirected and limited as the white hat/black hat story you decry.

      Mod parent up please. I hate it when Hollywood preaches at me, and no longer watch BG as a result.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    8. Re:Did they mention by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      BINGO! You've got exactly my interpretation which means you're probably right. The show is great precisely because it is realistic in the sense that their problems, like real-world problems, never have an elegant solution that'll please everyone and make everything all better.

    9. Re:Did they mention by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Caprica?

    10. Re:Did they mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Anonymous Psychopath" has issues with morality. News at 11.

    11. Re:Did they mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freeks and geeks with leeniks

    12. Re:Did they mention by khallow · · Score: 1

      I caught a bit of that special. One of those guys boasted there about making the cookiecutter racist, Colonel Tigh a cylon. And Gaius Baltar is the worst of the lot. I don't care that he's not wholly good or evil. Just shove him out an airlock already.

      And you didn't catch the moralizing? The most obvious is the racist is bad meme. But there's a tendency for a character to make some blatant moral assumption (like the cylons are pure evil) and then the show turns it on its end (Colonel Tigh, you're a cylon! Ha ha!). Then there was that stretch where they had a pile of humans in captivity on some planet. The show did a cute juxtaposition of that part with the insurgency in Iraq, except, of course, that the good guys were the freedom fighters.

    13. Re:Did they mention by khallow · · Score: 1

      Yes to both. Just because something is a real problem doesn't mean that it can't be presented in a dumb way. Every time the humans in the story do something self-destructive or have a contrived dilemma (like recently, resisting the adoption of cylon technology for jumping or the transition to the cylon base star from the stricken Galactica), there's always a little moral lesson tucked in there.

    14. Re:Did they mention by owlnation · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's why people dislike the show.

      I think it has a lot to do with fact that the overall writing and show direction is poorly managed. Which is a shame, because it has good actors (well, some of them), it has great production design, camerawork and vfx, and many of the individual scenes are well-written.

      However, the rambling, directionless story arcs are what made the show jump the shark about the middle of season 2.

      Great idea -- bad, bad, bad execution.

    15. Re:Did they mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of the end of the original three episode pilot. Galactica leads the fleet to a "resort" / tillium mining planet. When they find out that their hosts are eating them and that it's a cylon trap they flee. In the process, Starbuck and Apollo realize that the Basestar sneaking up on them from the other side of the planet is the Cylon leader's ship. They make a lot of broadcasts to each other, making it sound like they are closing on the Basestar with a bunch of viper squadrons (actually only the two of them). This causes the Basestar to move closer to the planet to "hide". Prior to leaving the surface, Apollo and Starbuck had used their lasers to ignite the tillium in the mines, turning the entire planet into one giant bomb waiting to explode. As such, when the Imperious Leader's ship hides too close to the planet, it is destroyed. At the end Baltar is brought forward to the command / "throne" room of the Basestar that he is on where he is convinced he will be executed. Instead Lucifer informs him that the new Imperious Leader has decided to spare his life. He is to be given a Basestar of his own to "help" him in extending peace to the humans. But it's all a trap with Baltar trying to bide his time and keep his head. He actually catches up with the fleet on Kobol in the second part of the two part episode that followed and tries to sell Adama on the Cylon's desire for peace but Adama won't have any of it. With Baltar gone too long on the surface of Kobol, Lucifer orders an attack on both the Fleet and the people on the surface. This causes part of the temple they are in to collapse trapping Baltar. Adama leaves Baltar there for dead suggesting that perhaps his new friends will come to save him. So ends any talk of peace...

    16. Re:Did they mention by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
      I think we may be viewing things differently. I don 't see a lot of moralizing about racism. There may be some anti-racist themes in the show but I am not conscious of them.

      I did notice the Caprica II/Iraq theme. I don't think it showed the insurgency as "good guys". There are no good guys in BG. The cylons screwed up something terrible because they were conflicted. The humans made quite a few errors themselves, particularly Colonel Tigh who ended up murdering his wife.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    17. Re:Did they mention by khallow · · Score: 1

      "There are no good guys in BG." Another of those little moral lessons they like to dole out. Stop me if you've heard this before. Some guy, say his role is a loyal number two or something gets portrayed for a bunch of episodes as a straight up good guy. Then they exploit that image with him turning into a cylon racist, killing his wife, and finding out that oops, he's a cylon too. Drama ensues. Or as in the case of Baltar or the Cylons, get set up as either a dupe or a strictly bad guy and then turn out not to be so. The thing is that they are overly fond of exploiting stereotype. It's an overused trick like a comedian who only does pratfalls.

      And there's a zillion cases where the humans would be doing so much better, if they treated cylons as just fellow beings. Hell, they wouldn't have had the genocide in the first place!

    18. Re:Did they mention by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ok, I just watched the finale and they abandon a working society to go back to being effectively herd animals in the savanna. What a stupid, fucking ending. And the racism==bad hammer gets used a few more times.

  8. Re:amatures by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    I am using IE6 on Windows XP and it is frakin' ugly.

    These pages render real crap under IE7 and Firefox.

  9. YOUTUBE version by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thankfully youtube saves us all: BSG at UN

    1. Re:YOUTUBE version by PatrickThomson · · Score: 0

      BUMP

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    2. Re:YOUTUBE version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUMP

      BUMP!?!?!?

      Dude, go back to your BB world.

    3. Re:YOUTUBE version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP!

    4. Re:YOUTUBE version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suck my bump you twit.

    5. Re:YOUTUBE version by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know that RealMedia is deeply hated when people are thankful for the posting of a flash version.

    6. Re:YOUTUBE version by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Evil Real (!): 15-20% CPU usage on G4 without any hickups whatsoever even while it is on Slashdot front page, almost live forward&skip at 225 kbps.

      Nothing above is true for Google Youtube (base 4% CPU hits 100% when flash inits) and people thank him and the first genius to post that basic ''people still use realmedia'' karma whoring post gets +5 insightful. Well, according to download site numbers THEY DO.

      I wonder if this Web 2.0 fashion at Slashdot have also gathered those professional commenters which infested the digg etc.

      Would I prefer a plain mpeg4 file or even a plain SD mpeg-2 for wget downloading overnight? Hell yes but NOT youtube, flash.

      I started to feel sad for Real Networks. They open sourced player, offer a legal mp3 license, offer their multi million dollar patents free to open source and people are only busy with karma whoring. They should have focused more on OS X and Windows instead. Let Linux guys wonder around with their unlicensed, reverse engineered hacks and Silverlight port trojan monkeys.

  10. Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by jmorris42 · · Score: 0, Troll

    > casting off the idea of race as a cultural determinant..

    But I thought we just elected a POTUS almost entirely based on his biracial itentity.

    "All Men are Created Equal" is such a dead white men idea I'm suprised he wasn't booed from the stage for pushing such crimethink propaganda. Guess there is some hope for our species after all.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  11. I have so many mixed feelings by JaimeZX · · Score: 1

    Love the show. Can't believe the cast took center stage at the UN. And Edward James-Adama yelling SO SAY WE ALL?!?!? I want to laugh and cry at the same time.

    Wow.

  12. I like this one.... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Hey, finally a story that matches my sig!! Too bad it has to appear in idle, which sullies everything that it touches by association. :( (and is there any reason the comment box is suddenly appearing small?)

    Events like this give me hope, because it is proof that people want to get together and be united, we don't have to have a common 'enemy' in order to make ourselves feel good. The fervor shown at this meeting sounds as great as that at any religious meeting, and it was in favor of everyone being together, realizing we are not different. This is proof that world peace is possible.

    --
    Qxe4
  13. I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Hordeking · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously. Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do? Does the US constitution even have a sovereignty clause that forbids allowing foreign sovereignty (for instance, by the UN), or is that just an interpretation? I can't find one, but I'm at work (and posting on /., yeah I know)

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    1. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously. Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do?

      Um, because Slashdot wouldn't have a story on its front page if you were to visit the UN?

    2. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do?

      Because they look better than you. Seriously, a large part of politics is about PR - and actors are useful for that.

      Does the US constitution even have a sovereignty clause that forbids allowing foreign sovereignty (for instance, by the UN), or is that just an interpretation?

      The fact that the constitution is the supreme law of the land. This means that no treaty has the power to modify it.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    3. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because if you shouted "So say we all," it would sound silly.

      When EJO shouts it, people want--no, need--to obey.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    4. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the US Constitution says that we abide by all treaties to which we are a party.

      Since as a nation we're agreed to be a part of and abide by the rules of the UN, among other things, our constitution says that we have to abide by their rules.

    5. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that the constitution is the supreme law of the land. This means that no treaty has the power to modify it.

      Theoretically. The document itself has become more and more symbolic over time and it's been less held as "law of the land." It's been used more for political maneuvering among all three branches. That is inevitably what happens when you have a "Living Constitution" interpretation and not a strict "constructionist" one where any changes must be ratified, because you can just claim that your interpretation is the best for the times and thus not have to worry about procedure and dissent. When you're not held to a constant literal meaning of law, then the law simply means whatever the interpreter wants it to mean and whatever they can get away with through that interpretation. And it's not going to be just Bush. Obama will do the same thing, when it suits him or what he wants and believes.

    6. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by genner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seriously. Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do?

      Um, because Slashdot wouldn't have a story on its front page if you were to visit the UN?

      Oh I guarantee I would make the news if I visted the UN....which is why they won't invite me.

    7. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm unsure that politicians and soldiers are more qualified. People did not applaud an actor. They applauded a beautiful idea told by a great orator. That is no acting, that is what politics is since the word exists.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    8. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by genner · · Score: 1

      Because if you shouted "So say we all," it would sound silly.

      When EJO shouts it, people want--no, need--to obey.

      Yeah, otherwise you might get a strongly worded letter from them.

    9. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > When you're not held to a constant literal meaning of law, then the law simply
      > means whatever the interpreter wants it to mean and whatever
      > they can get away with through that interpretation.

      Or more simply, we exchanged the Rule of Law for the Rule of Men.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    10. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

      I know it's not directly tied to your post, but your words immediately got me thinking about Dr. Sanjay Gupta, who is the chief medical correspondent on CNN and was a nominee for US Surgeon General. He's a very well-spoken professional and is not shy about sharing his opinions on medical issues such as universal coverage and embryonic cell research.

    11. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Is that more a good thing or a bad thing?

    12. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously. Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do?

      Because they have an audience larger than the population of many UN member states. Seriously.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    13. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      mod parent up

    14. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame Ronald Reagan.

    15. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Is that more a good thing or a bad thing?

      If you have to ask.....

      The idea that the Rule of Law had to prevail over the Rule of Men was probably the highest achievement of the Western system of thought. None of the rest is possible to keep without it. It is one of the central ideas encoded in the Arthur legends it goes back so far and is embedded so deep in our culture. It required generations of control over government schools to produce a population clueless enough to renounce that inheritance.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    16. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      OK, I generally agree with you. I'm not sure there was some conspiracy over "government schools" brainwashing students, but yes, "rule of men" is not something I'm quite fond of.

      The reason I asked is because I'm sure some people rather like the idea of "rule of men." It sounds so populist.

      Of course, I went through a public school civics class like everyone else. The instructor, a democrat, didn't very much like my joke of blurting out "terrorists in the White House" to a friend as a joke and would not even allow us to represent a third party (heh, guess which one?) when doing a project on political parties--we could only represent Democrats or Republicans; this solidified in other students minds the legitimacy of the parties as ruling bodies. When watching an educationally useless video of Air Force One, everyone was wowed by all the luxuries on it. Only my friend and I were offended that our tax dollars are being used to treat the president, who should be more of a public servant, like a king.

      I think it's less that there's top-down brainwashing plots and more of simply the stupid-minded and patriotic end up teaching civics classes.

    17. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Because they look better than you. Seriously, a large part of politics is about PR - and actors are useful for that.

      Then why Edward James Olmos? He's a fine actor, but he looks like someone set his face on fire and then put it out with a pitchfork.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    18. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Men write the Laws. What's the difference?

    19. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do?

      There's a lot of smart, well spoken people with good ideas. Nobody has ever heard of them. People have heard of the actors from various shows, even though actors are, as a population, stupid, narcissistic, and shortsighted.

    20. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Does the US constitution even have a sovereignty clause that forbids allowing foreign sovereignty (for instance, by the UN), or is that just an interpretation?

      If the US weren't sovereign, what the Constitution says wouldn't matter because the sovereign entity could override it. It does say this, though:

      This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;

    21. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by eepok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. Whether a political philosophy or better understanding about our living society comes from someone who was voted into bureaucratical power or someone who "merely" has cultural influence bestowed by science fiction, that philosophy and that understanding is significant on its own. They were not applauding "Adama" nor were they applauding Olmos. They applauded a proper philosophy about the being of man in the halls of a building that has been trying to make such strong assertions for decades-- if ever so impotently.

      The people that made this entire event happen understood that, beyond all things, old people want to stay in power but they do not change. Society changes. And the only way society changes is by the growth and further education of the youth that will replace our now-ignorant elders. They understood that we as adults have been so very flawed and that our kids need to know our mistakes and errors lest they be doomed to repeat them.

    22. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Men write the Laws. What's the difference?

      For the readers educated in government schools.... Some might get some of this eventually.

      The difference is night and day. In the Rule of Men whatever the current President/King/Emperor/etc says is Law. This is basically what we now have, Constituition be damned, if The Supremes say it it is Law and they aren't bound by any external force or agreement. And we have been conditioned to accept this as legitimate justice.

      With the Rule of Law the laws are written down ahead of time and everyone knows what the laws are and are bound to them. Yes they can be changed but you actually have to change them, and you generally aren't allowed to make a retroactive change. Changing the Constituition itself is permissible but the procedure was intentionally made difficult to protect against momentary passions.

      So for example Roe v Wade was clearly a violation. If as a country we want the Federal government to take a position one way or the other on the issue we should have had to amend the Constituition. That would have forced a huge messy public debate on the issue and we would have settled the issue back in the 1970's and not still be fighting it out now. The way it is now everyone realizes that five Supremes ARE the law so both sides fight to get five of theirs on, thus the issue hinges of the power balance of the day.. i.e. on the MEN who hold the office not the LAW they uphold.

      The fact we all sat waiting for the Supremes to rule in the Keller decision, and that the outcome was actually in doubt, proves we have exchanged the Rule of Law for the Rule of Men. No scholar of the English language as used to write the 2nd Amendment disputes the clear meaning of the words. No scholar of the men who wrote the words dispute the meaning they intended the words to have. Yet we waited patiently for the Nine Robed Eminences to pronounce their verdict that, by a slim 5-4 decision, the Law really would be upheld.... for now. One vacancy and we could have five who believe differently. If the Rule of Law still held every Justice who dissented would have been removed on the grounds of either failing to exhibit basic English Comprehension or willful refusal to carry out their Oath.

      Again, if We the People through our elected Representitives and by following the Law governing Amendments want to remove or tweak the 2nd we have that power. But to pretend it simply doesn't exist anymore because the Constituition 'Lives' destroys the Rule of Law.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    23. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
      It's not just politicians that get the royal treatment. Have you paid any attention to the way people treat and think of Hollyweird celebrities? That's a real aristocracy. As sad as it was we would never have heard of Natasha Richardson's accident had she not been a famous actress. Lindsay Lohan would just be another dim-bulb if not for her acting.

      I guess if people don't have a real aristocracy they create one.

      And people say the South lost the war.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    24. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by camperdave · · Score: 1

      There are, of course, many
      actors who are well spoken
      people with good ideas. I
      get the impression that
      Edward James Olmos is
      one of them.

      Now fix the comment
      field in the Idle section.

      SO SAY WE ALL!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    25. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by ajs · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do?

      Well, there are some obvious reasons. I'd say chief among them being the fact that we, for lack of a better metric, associate popularity with the relevance of a message to the population, and of all of the TV shows that delve into the topics that BSG does (hint: there aren't any other on TV right now), it's the most popular.

      That said, I don't see why the *actors* are the people you invite per se. It's really the writers who had something to say. Then again, Olmos certainly did make a strong point for his being involved, even if he made the guy next to him squirm like a bug.

    26. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by geekoid · · Score: 1

      PR does not equal good looks, and neither does charisma.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      OK, I generally agree with you. I'm not sure there was some conspiracy over "government schools" brainwashing students

      This probably is actually the truth. However, it's probably a symptom of the general problem, rather than a cause. I suspect that the liberal agendas tend to have a trickle-down effect here. After all, a teacher can't say "x is bad, y is good" in regards to politics unless it's absolutely certain that's an opinion, and even then it's iffy. Of course a teacher can roundaboutly say do this, by teaching and focusing on all sorts of principles that liberals consider a mainstay, to the exclusion of the conservative ones. Ever notice how they really push sharing and collective "ownership" in kindergarten (it's not yours, it's all of ours)? Sure they teach to ask nicely for things, and then when someone doesn't want to give it up, the teacher takes the role of BB and takes it and hands it over. No such thing as telling the other kid to make do and find another toy.

      this solidified in other students minds the legitimacy of the parties as ruling bodies. When watching an educationally useless video of Air Force One, everyone was wowed by all the luxuries on it. Only my friend and I were offended that our tax dollars are being used to treat the president, who should be more of a public servant, like a king.

      So you're not the only person who is absolutely disgusted by this. Good. I thought I was a terrorist or something because of my crimethink.

      I think it's less that there's top-down brainwashing plots and more of simply the stupid-minded and patriotic end up teaching civics classes.

      Some of this is apathy on the part of the kids. I had some pretty liberal teachers in high school and college. If a kid is really interested, he'll drive himself to learn and make a change (or try to). Empowerment isn't always the teacher's job.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    28. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      It's not just politicians that get the royal treatment. Have you paid any attention to the way people treat and think of Hollyweird celebrities? That's a real aristocracy. As sad as it was we would never have heard of Natasha Richardson's accident had she not been a famous actress. Lindsay Lohan would just be another dim-bulb if not for her acting.

      I guess if people don't have a real aristocracy they create one.

      Lindsay Lohan IS just another dim bulb. And I'd never even heard of Natasha Richardson until she had an accident.

      And people say the South lost the war.

      It hasn't yet. It's a giant Confederate sleeper cell. But don't tell BHO; he might send some soldiers over in suicide vests to excise the chancre that is the Confederacy. Incidentally, the Confederate States have not been dissolved yet. Technically, it simply doesn't have any member states at the moment (i.e. it's a country on paper, with no land).

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    29. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by MarcoPon · · Score: 1

      Because the actors are better actors, actually.

      --

      SeqBox
    30. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There are, of course, many actors who are well spoken people with good ideas. I get the impression that Edward James Olmos is one of them. Now fix the comment field in the Idle section. SO SAY WE ALL!

      Mr. Shatner,
      it's time
      for your spongebath...

    31. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      It is because the story is written by people who has deep political beliefs and knowledge along with the religious roots of the series.

      The series give ideas about how future human/politics relations may become and how some stuff would never change at all. I can guarantee you that a good Roman senator brought to 2008 could win USA or any election with same tactics, tricks as he did 2000 years ago.

      The series aren't really pure sci-fi stuff, don't let the spaceships fool you.

      They aren't giving their message, they are giving the series message. So, they are still acting.

      The series have way deep political and even religious background, if you check biography of creators and writers, you can get surprised. It is a very unique thing in that sense. Some even say you can figure what are the real beliefs of mormons by just watching it.

    32. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      So for example Roe v Wade was clearly a violation. If as a country we want the Federal government to take a position one way or the other on the issue we should have had to amend the Constituition. That would have forced a huge messy public debate on the issue and we would have settled the issue back in the 1970's and not still be fighting it out now. The way it is now everyone realizes that five Supremes ARE the law so both sides fight to get five of theirs on, thus the issue hinges of the power balance of the day.. i.e. on the MEN who hold the office not the LAW they uphold.
      To others reading this, please note you don't have to be against abortion to think Roe vs. Wade was done on ideological and not legal grounds. Abortion is an issue more complicated than "women's rights!" because the question also involes whether the fetus is "alive"/a person/etc or not.

      I am staunchly in favor of abortion. But it really should be a state's issue, legally speaking.

      Most people don't even realize that R v. W was decided based on the issue of -privacy-. What a farce!

    33. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Abortion is an issue more complicated than "women's rights!" because the question
      > also involes whether the fetus is "alive"/a person/etc or not.

      Nope. It was decided because a majority wanted to legalize abortion. Period. After that it was just coming up with some bullcrap to justify that decision. The Constitution says nothing about abortion. Every doctor who took the Hippocratic Oath at the time of the writing of the document swore NOT to be involved in the practice so the Founders certainly were aware of the concept. So since they knew of it and failed to enumerate it as a power of the Federal government there should be zero argument that the 10th Amendment makes it an issue for the States.

      Had they been actually doing their job the ruling would have consisted of the following and nothing more:

      "The only guidance the Constitution provides is mentioning "Born or naturalized" in relation to citizenship. Thus the Constitution implies Birth as the dividing line between having rights and not having them. Therefore this Court has no grounds to rule that the States must forbid abortion. Since a fetus is thus not a person for purposes of Federal Law and the Constitution is silent on the issue the 10th Amendment reserves the regulation of abortion to the States and thus this Court has no power to require a State to permit, forbid or otherwise control the availibility, price or anything else related to the practice."

      "If Congress is unhappy with this ruling it is free to begin the Amendment process. This Court will of course abide by any change lawfully made to the Constitution."

      > Most people don't even realize that R v. W was decided based on the issue of -privacy-. What a farce!

      Especially since privacy isn't a Right mentioned at any point in the document. Earlier 'rulings' created that one.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    34. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Nope. It was decided because a majority wanted to legalize abortion. Period. After that it was just coming up with some bullcrap to justify that decision. The Constitution says nothing about abortion. Every doctor who took the Hippocratic Oath at the time of the writing of the document swore NOT to be involved in the practice so the Founders certainly were aware of the concept. So since they knew of it and failed to enumerate it as a power of the Federal government there should be zero argument that the 10th Amendment makes it an issue for the States.

      Had they been actually doing their job the ruling would have consisted of the following and nothing more:

      "The only guidance the Constitution provides is mentioning "Born or naturalized" in relation to citizenship. Thus the Constitution implies Birth as the dividing line between having rights and not having them. Therefore this Court has no grounds to rule that the States must forbid abortion. Since a fetus is thus not a person for purposes of Federal Law and the Constitution is silent on the issue the 10th Amendment reserves the regulation of abortion to the States and thus this Court has no power to require a State to permit, forbid or otherwise control the availibility, price or anything else related to the practice."

      I am not talking about WHY it was "made legal", I am merely saying that a more secular case for abortion does exist. That is, abortion is not as easy as just saying "Women have the right!" because the status of the fetus is what the anti-abortionists are calling into question.

      I agree with you completely on the issue. Abortion should be up to the states.

    35. Re:I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      The series aren't really pure sci-fi stuff, don't let the spaceships fool you.

      Don't let starwars fool you. sci-fi is not about spaceships. It is about mankind and its future.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  14. Or you could use the power of the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and find it on YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSFDrOxWCXY

  15. Galaxy Quest anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jason Nesmith: Mathesar, there's no such person as Captain Taggart. My name is Jason Nesmith. I'm an actor. We're all actors.
    Sarris: He doesn't understand. Explain as you would a child.
    Jason Nesmith: We, uh, we pretended.
    [On Malthesar's blank look]
    Jason Nesmith: We lied.
    Jason Nesmith: I'm not a commander. There's no "National Space Exploration Administration." We don't have a ship.
    Mathesar: [looking at TV screen] But there it is...
    Jason Nesmith: [gesturing with his fingers] The ship is that big.
    Mathesar: But inside, I see many rooms.
    Jason Nesmith: You've seen plywood sets that look like the inside. Our beryllium sphere is... is wire with plaster around it. And our digital conveyor is... it's Christmas tree lights. It's a decoration. It's all fake. Just like me.
    Mathesar: But why...?
    Jason Nesmith: It's difficult to explain. On our planet, we, uh... we pretend to... to entertain. Mathesar, I am so sorry. God, I am so sorry.

    1. Re:Galaxy Quest anyone? by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Interesting

      God, I am so sorry.

            I applaud how you move effortlessly from one fiction to the next...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Galaxy Quest anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud how you move effortlessly from one fiction to the next...

      AC: Dunbal, there's no such person as God. My name is AC. I'm a poser. We're all posers.
      Sarris: He doesn't understand. Explain as you would a child.
      AC: We, uh, we pretended.
      [On Dunbal's blank look]
      AC: We lied.
      AC: I'm not a saint. There's no "Holy Roman Empire." We don't have a Heaven.
      Dunbal: [looking at Bible] But there it is...
      AC: [gesturing with his fingers] The book is filled with BS.
      Dunbal: But inside, I see many stories.
      AC: You've read fictions sets that look like history. Our resurrection is... is a recovery from a bad flu. And our magical wine is... it's wine with water added to it. It's a scam. It's all fake. Just like me.
      Dunbal: But why...?
      AC: It's difficult to explain. On our planet, we, uh... we pretend to... to believe. Dunbai, I am so sorry. Zeus, I am so sorry.

  16. Sci-Fi Channel Better Have Footed the Whole Bill by mlund · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The very possibility of any tax-payer dollars paying for this made me throw up a little bit in my mouth. If the U.N. junketeers want to get their Sci-Fi on they'd better pay out of their own pockets for their own convention badges like everyone else.

    Hooray! A bunch of international bureaucrats to have their own sci-fi wank-fest. Yeah, use the U.N. building as a venue for advertising a private company's DVD sales. That's probably the least irresponsible thing the U.N.'s done in a decade ... I wonder if they'd ever consider seriously confronting grave moral and geo-political issues. Perhaps they could invite philosophers, statesmen, and theologians before they brought out the entertainers.

  17. Re:amatures by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    you're browsing without your glasses again aren't you?

    P.S.
    GOOD GOOGLY MOOGLY! Even the idle comments is screwed up.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  18. Re:amatures by Cornflake917 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I didn't know Christian Bale visited Slashdot. Can I have your autograph?

  19. Get it right, man! by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    Good guys in tan jackets, bad guys in chrome!

    Of course, there were the really good guys who glowed white.

    1. Re:Get it right, man! by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Good guys in tan jackets"

      No one with hair like that could have been called in any way "good."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  20. Now if only the UN... by PK+Tech+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    can pass a resolution to stop SciFi from becoming Syfy.

    1. Re:Now if only the UN... by sammyo · · Score: 1

      If they were actually cool and clever the new tag would be

                Very Dynamic

    2. Re:Now if only the UN... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Yeah what IS that about anyway?
      Just because most teenage texters can't spell, why inflict it on the rest of the world? If you want to shorten SCI-FI even further, Whats wrong with the existing (and shorter than SyFy) convention of using "SF" anyway?

    3. Re:Now if only the UN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So say we all!

    4. Re:Now if only the UN... by Y.A.A.P. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Er, why would you want to stop a good thing from happening?

      With the current SciFi channel changing their name to Syfy, there's a chance that someone who wants to make a real science fiction channel could finally come along and use the name 'SciFi'. You know, a channel that wouldn't air pro-wrestling, "reality" shows, and an unending stream of movies featuring giant snakes...

    5. Re:Now if only the UN... by daveywest · · Score: 1

      So say we ALL!

    6. Re:Now if only the UN... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      SF is a step up from Sci-Fi. SF is about deep concepts, extrapolations of the impact of scientific advancements and explorations of the alternatives. Sci-Fi is about blinking lights and B-rated actors playing cops and robbers with rubber suit "aliens".

      SyFy is an abomination that will try to pass off occult fiction, comic book adaptations, pro wrestling, and who knows what reality shows, as science fiction.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Now if only the UN... by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      SyFy is hip wit the cool kidz, yo. SciFi is for fat nerdy greasy pimply unclean virgin nerds. I don't want to associate wit dat shiznit! Now, mindless reality shows on this new blang blang syphily i can hang wit.

      Werd.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    8. Re:Now if only the UN... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> SF is a step up from Sci-Fi. SF is about deep concepts, extrapolations of the impact of scientific advancements and explorations of the alternatives.

      Wow I wish there was a TV channel like that. What the hell has Ghostbusting and vampire drama got to do with SciFi anyway?

      >> SyFy is an abomination that will try to pass off occult fiction, comic book adaptations, pro wrestling, and who knows what reality shows, as science fiction. ...errr so basically what the SciFi channel already is then?

    9. Re:Now if only the UN... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      I say they switch to nothing but samurai flicks and anime, and become sai-fi.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    10. Re:Now if only the UN... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      What does it matter?

      Farscape is a distant memory. Stargate has long since ended; and it sucked pretty hard anyway once they lost Richard Dean Anderson. Doctor Who has lost David Tennant. And Battlestar is about to end. So what's left? Seriously... what reason is left to tune in at all?

      SciFi, SyFy, SF, whatever they call it. I doubt I'll be watching anyway.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    11. Re:Now if only the UN... by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1

      Except they'll probably retain the trademark they have on the name.

  21. Eh, pointless emantics by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    I watched the clip on youtube and maybe I missed something, but Olmos seems to be making a big deal about a little thing. He claims that race does not equal culture and that the word race has been misapplied to culture to justify the killing of other humans because "you can't kill your own race."

    I don't think it makes one iota of difference whether you think the term "race" applies to a group of shared ideals and customs or a set of common chromosomes. People will always come up with a way to portray their enemies as "the other" so as to tap into the human trait of distrust of "the other" and encourage the unthinking masses to attack them. Even within groups of highly similar cultures, as long as there is a dispute each side will come up with a way to dehumanize the other side.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Eh, pointless emantics by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Isn't that, you know, kind of the overarching theme of the show? The dehumanizing of your enemies to the point where no atrocity is unacceptable because the enemy is not just different, but fundamentally inferior to you.

      Maybe Olmos doesn't get it completely, but the writters of the show clearly set out to make the point from the beginning. Even the noblest characters in the show do horrible things and only very slowly realize that cylons are human in every way that matters.

    2. Re:Eh, pointless emantics by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Olmos seems to be making a big deal about a little thing. He claims that race does not equal culture and that the word race has been misapplied to culture

      I haven't watched the video but if that is the point he is making then it is not a little one. It's a very big one, particularly in todays world.

      Today's modern world resembles Europe in the 1100's or before. In those times, the different nations of Europe referred to other cultures as being different "Races". Saxons were a different "race" to Normans, who were a different "race" to Franks, who were a different "race" to Poles who were a different "race" to Fins, etc, etc. Nowadays, almost every one of these groups is regarded as being in the same "Caucasian" "race".

      So in today's world, when people talk about the "Western race", or "Arab race" or "Chinese race", are they really talking about some concrete objective genetic differences, or is the real distinction here only in the culture. In another 1000 years, will we still be putting people in "racial" categories, or will we instead talking about cultures and nations.

      I certainly hope it's the latter scenario.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:Eh, pointless emantics by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I believe there are different breeds of humans with different tendencies and traits, just like there are different breeds of dogs.

      Plenty of scientific evidence for that.

      Some breeds of humans are more prone to certain diseases, and other breeds are prone to a different set.

      Now human breeds may not be as distinct as in dog breeds - we probably more mutts or mongrels in comparison. But they are still there due to generations of "selection" (via isolation, genocide, racism etc).

      Call me cynical, but whether people use race or culture, or some other new term, it makes no difference. It's trivial to get people to think "Us vs Them". And it'll always be useful for leaders to get people to do so.

      --
  22. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People are too quick to cast off the idea that race doesn't mean anything biologically through ideological lens. It's true that people all deserve the same political treatment, but people are so scared of racial bigotry and eugenics and social darwinism that they sometimes can't see straight. For example, the authors of The Bell Curve were blasted for supposedly being racial bigots, however wrong or right they were, and E. O. Wilson of Sociobiology fame had water thrown on him because the the nuturist bias of many on the left makes them view any innatist viewpoint as being "right-wing" apologetics for racial mistreatment or whatever, which is completely wrongminded. Nature doesn't care about how you think the world is supposed to work.

    You argue, however rightly or wrongly, that blacks may have a genetic TENDENCY towards lower IQs (I am not saying this is true, bear with me here) and people blast you, however, you say a minority group (Ashkenazi Jews) may have a heritable tendency towards higher IQs (apparently some study supported this hypothesis) and you don't see people rioting over it. People want "smile science", they want only nice things to be reported and they view publishing any negative or socially inconvenient data to be, well, socially irresponsible, no matter how true it even is. Remember, brain and body are one, as every physical change in the body is heritable so too are any structural changes in the brain which result in expressions of mental capacity and behavioral output.

    I am not saying race does play a significant role in intellectual qualities. Clearly, it does play some of a role in some qualities (why all the tall black men in the NBA? Because they're physically built for the sport!) but it is not at all impossible that a race may have a tendency towards lower or higher IQs. And, as I've been sure to mention, this is all genetic tendency; variation among individuals still exists and even in a population with a mean IQ lower than the mean IQ of the average population you can still have IQs above the mean of the overall population.

    It's also worth nothing that nature often cares little about the categories we've assigned to things for our human way of thinking. Evolution shows us that "species" is not at all easy to define as we think. A good video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rb5OEw_q-II (made by rather intelligent shanek guy who laboriously fights idiots online. If you're reading this Shane, "Hi!"). The point of this is to show that yes, race is largely a human construct, much like species itself is, but that does not mean it is entirely meaningless. We know some racial groups are more at risk for certain types of disease, for example.

    The overall fallacy here is thinking that behavior/mental processes are somehow different from physical one, when behavior itself is a resultant of the physical workings of the brain, and thus some races really could be different from others in a particular way.

    That said, Battlestar Galactica is a great show because they don't shove a particular moral conclusion down your throat (insofar that the Cylon vs. Human dynamic is obviously a racial conflict in large part caused by human arrogance and inability to forgive) a lot of the time by making the issues difficult with no clear convenient solution, just as they are in real life, and also making none of the people on the show paragons of human virtue and morality. It doesn't seem to me like any character acts as a Lisa Simpson that serves as a mouthpiece for the writers to evangelize for their position.

  23. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by Cornflake917 · · Score: 4, Funny

    As someone who is about 3/4 of the way though the 3rd season, all I can say is:

    Fuck you, asshole

  24. I can't take it by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Even after 10 years, RealMedia still buffers and stutters and looks terrible.
    Can someone please post a link to teh full 2 hour BSG UN discussion?

    --
    -
    1. Re:I can't take it by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      I tried ripping the stream, but it cut out halfway through :(

    2. Re:I can't take it by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's only 8 minutes long in any other player.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Informative

    > But I thought we just elected a POTUS almost entirely based on his biracial itentity.

    Nope. The republicans managed to find themselves the perfect storm of hubris and arrogance. They managed to screw the pooch badly enough that people got over the fact that the other guy was black.

    The hick fundie out-of-touch governor from the great white north was just the icing on the cake and that last push necessary for a lot of people to get over old predjudices.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  26. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by RabidMoose · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least the spoiler he gave isn't that far off for you, only a few more episodes.

    Now, you've got about 30 hours to watch 23 episodes + Razor + webisodes before the finale tomorrow night.

    Better go get some energy drinks.

  27. Re:Sci-Fi Channel Better Have Footed the Whole Bil by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The UN never does anything useful anyway. They'd might as well entertain us a little.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  28. Re:Sci-Fi Channel Better Have Footed the Whole Bil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's SyFy not Sci-Fi, didn't you get the memo? :)

  29. I'm not a preacher, but I play one on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That is inevitably what happens when you have a "Living Constitution" interpretation and not a strict "constructionist" one where any changes must be ratified, because you can just claim that your interpretation is the best for the times and thus not have to worry about procedure and dissent"

    *Opens up his bible and starts reading.* ;)

    1. Re:I'm not a preacher, but I play one on TV by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Haha, oh man, I didn't even think of that, but you are right on the mark.

  30. Re:Sci-Fi Channel Better Have Footed the Whole Bil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the U.N. junketeers want to get their SyFy

    Fixed it for you.

  31. Oh, uh, we must be seriously in the shitter . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Usually folks tend to turn to religion and mystic stuff, when their whole existence is in total disorder. But the UN looking at a science fiction series for advice?

    We're doomed.

    Are there any rockets scheduled to leave the Earth real soon? Now I know what motivated that bat on the space shuttle.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  32. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

    That was 2 years ago. In case you are even farther behind here is a few more for you; King Kong dies and Aerith is killed by Sephiroth at the end of disk 1.

  33. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    I honestly wouldn't worry about it too much. It's not like the writers hint at it, it's really out of the blue. Knowing now won't give you any spoiler insight on what you're watching now.

  34. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who's eagerly waiting for tomorrow, but still don't want the show to go away, all I can say is:
    Frack you and your stupidly slow TV-watching habits.

    Really?
    You come into a discussion about a show where the finale is just about to air, and you don't expect spoilers?
    Frack you!

    What's more: Chief Tyrol is a Cylon, Starbuck is a corpse, Sam Anders is a Cylon, Tory Foster's a Cylon, Ellen is also a Cylon.

    The final Cylon was "Daniel".
    Speculation is he's related to Starbuck.

    Earth was wiped out by nuclear war.

  35. Unbelievable... by pottymouth · · Score: 1

    "None of us is as stupid as all of us together"

    Wow! A group of pretend space people in the biggest organization of pretend do gooders on the planet.

    And the only thing more silly is someone being inspired by it all... Again I say.. Wow...

  36. Ah yes piling on the whitey guilt... by Phizzle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Frakkin irony, a frakkin about-to-be-a-washed-up-has-been actor preaching frakkin racial equality but then pins the racial evils on the white folks... The whitey guild card has been over played, and yet people keep tugging at that scab under the guise of denouncing it. Human beings treated each other differently based on their appearance ages ago, before the concepts of racism have been defined. These days its just an outdated buzzword being milked by politicians and demagogues to distract the people from the real problems facing the humanity.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
    1. Re:Ah yes piling on the whitey guilt... by Phizzle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      To the dipshit who modded this as flamebait: Flamebait is shorter and less thought through, like this post. The one above it is a statement. Learn the difference you ignorant duchebag. See now thats makes this post more of a troll than a flamebait. Just because someone has the balls to introduce an idea that doesnt fit into your shackled mindset, that doesnt make it a flamebait, hell if you can get through all of its polysyllabic goodness it can be downright enlightening.

      --
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  37. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by Etrias · · Score: 2, Informative

    You prick. Couldn't have at least had a spoiler warning on your title? I'm less bitter at Ron Moore and very bitter toward you.

    That goes for the mod who bumped up your post to "interesting" as well. Frakking idiots.

  38. LIES! Damned dirty LIES!!! by Murpster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lorne Greene is dead, so there's no way Adama was just at the UN.

  39. More news... by tjstork · · Score: 1

    As someone who is about 3/4 of the way though the 3rd season, all I can say is: Fuck you, asshole

    I believe that's Frak You. Also, in case you missed, Darth Vader REALLY IS Luke's father but he is somewhat redeemed by turning against the emperor and saving Luke's life. Meanwhile, the rebels succeed in lowering the planetary shields to the Death Star and successfully assaulting the main reactor. Han's worries about Luke as a rival to Leia's affections turns out to be misplaced, as Luke turns out to be Leia's sister, leaving fans to wonder what exactly the nature of the kiss in the Empire Strikes Back was really all about.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:More news... by Trouvist · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, I totally didn't get that out of Star Wars! Luke is Leia's SISTER?! OMG no wonder! The hair makes sense now!

    2. Re:More news... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between a show that's still has an audience growing, and a 30 year old movie.

      Asshole.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:More news... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      huh, good thing that first kiss didn't turn out to be a blow job. THAT would have been awkward later on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:More news... by idfubar · · Score: 0

      Moderated "informative"?

      --

      Rishi Chopra
      www.rishichopra.org
  40. Think now, there is something very, ah, right by sammyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's TV show, it is not how the real world works... oh, wait

    It's the UN, it is not how the real world works.

  41. How could you not know? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    You prick. Couldn't have at least had a spoiler warning on your title...

    The episode in question aired like over a year and half ago! That's just crazy...

    oh, by the way: spoiler alert.. in Gone With the Wind, the South LOSES the Civil War.. and, in King Kong, a bunch of biplanes shoot up the Gorilla off of the top of the Empire State Building. Darth Vader really is Luke's father. Gandalf really does die by he is sent back as Gandalf the White, with some kick butt new powers as well. Elric kills Moonglum to have strength to blow the horn of fate, and he brings in the new world, and then, Stormbringer kills Elric at the end, saying, Farewell I was a thousand times more evil than thou. Oh, and Jason isn't really killed at the end of Friday the 13th.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:How could you not know? by Etrias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Simple. I don't watch commercial TV. I watch things on my own time. I'm watching BSG on DVD, just like I do with most other shows I want to watch because I can't stand commercials. And frankly, I was trying to have this mad rush to try and watch everything before the final episode, but whatever...

      More to the point is that your post had nothing to do with the topic about BSG being at the UN. Hey, I have my beefs with the show too, but if there's a spoiler involved, I'll at least try to give someone a heads up.

  42. This is disturbing by maynard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Battlestar Galactica is a television show. It's a fine enough show I guess, but it is not worthy of wasting the time of a body that meets ostensibly to diplomatically resolve real world conflicts, forge various international agreements, and - at times - deploy troops for peacekeeping. That television show is fantasy. What's going on at Darfur is the real thing.

    WTF?

    1. Re:This is disturbing by iny0urbrain · · Score: 1

      It gave me a reason to go to the UN website. I even poked around a little, and favorited the video of Olmos speaking on Youtube.

      Its just advertising. What's wrong with that?

    2. Re:This is disturbing by the_raptor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only the UN security council really does anything that involves military interventions. And this wasn't the general assembly let alone the security council.

      And actually the main job of the UN is to dick around and make it look like international law and treaties aren't made in shady backroom deals.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    3. Re:This is disturbing by initialE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's going on in the UN is, for the most part, also fantasy.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  43. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (insofar that the Cylon vs. Human dynamic is obviously a racial conflict in large part caused by human arrogance and inability to forgive)

    I think you should watch the show again. The humans have done almost nothing but forgiving, only to be stabbed in the back repeatedly for their troubles.

    The new series is rather like the old saw about the scorpion and the frog.

  44. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by suprslackr420 · · Score: 0, Informative

    Fact: race is a social construct, or better put, genome variation research does not support the existence of human races (races being defined as genetic subspecies' of humans). Fact: there is more genetic variation within groups thatn there is between groups. This is easily tested: If you are "white," simply go out to a public place, get a "white" person and a "black" person, and all three of you go get DNA tests. There is a high probability that you will share a closer genetic makeup with the "black" person than with the "white" person. I would personally not take offense to the theory that people with a certain amount of melanin share traits, except that it IS NOT TRUE.

    For example, you take as given that theere are certain "racial groups" that are more at risk for certain type of diseases. I have to assume that you are referring to sickle-cell anemia, although you might be referrring to Tay-Sachs. Sickle-cell has been shown to correlate with trade routes in Africa, and has no higher occurrence among those with a higher skin melanin content in the regions where it has occurred more frequently.

    I don't care if my science comes with a smile, but I insist that it comes with some science.

    --
    ubi dubium ibi libertas.
  45. Hippocrite? by doug141 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I understand him, the word "race" can't be used as a "cultural determinant" UNLESS you are blaming something on "the caucasian race", like he does at 1:42 in the video on youtube.

    1. Re:Hippocrite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy is a fraud. When he said that part, it showed his true colours. He was the biggest racist in the building.

      There ARE different races. The world would suck pretty badly if it was one global monoculture. His whole "one race/human race" crap is the same braindead, feel-good front that all politicians and public figures have been regurgitating for years. It wasn't insightful, it wasn't intelligent, it wasn't even true.

      Also, the real Adama was Lorne Greene, nobody else. I mean "so say we all", what the fuck is that shit? Something they came up with for the copy of Battlestar Galactica? Is it supposed to be catchy or something?

    2. Re:Hippocrite? by Sasayaki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He was clearly being sarcastic when he said that. If he was writing it, he would have written it thusly;

      The... "caucasian"... race, wanted to etc.

      It was quite clear to me.

      --
      Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
    3. Re:Hippocrite? by Smuttley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      listen to the tone that he says the word with. It's quite clear he's using it ironically.

    4. Re:Hippocrite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was he also being sarcastic when he pinned all of the faults on the "caucasian" race or do you need to make up a different excuse for that?

    5. Re:Hippocrite? by Smuttley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The guy is a fraud. When he said that part, it showed his true colours. He was the biggest racist in the building.

      it was pretty clear he was using the term ironically. Just listen to the tone of his voice.

      There ARE different races. The world would suck pretty badly if it was one global monoculture.

      you clearly missed his point about race not being the same as culture by a country mile. Do the Caucasians in America all have the same culture? How about compared to caucasians in say Hungary?

    6. Re:Hippocrite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had no such point. You've just fabricated that to defend his racism.

    7. Re:Hippocrite? by Smuttley · · Score: 1

      I don't know why I'm even bothering to reply.

      You're either a troll or just deaf. I'm not sure.

      If you actually listen to his first sentence he says he finds it "incredible that we use the word race as a cultural determinant". He then expands on this further with "we've made the word race a way of expressing culture."

      Need I really say more?

  46. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    As someone who is about 3/4 of the way though the 3rd season, all I can say is:

    Fuck you, asshole

    If it's any consolation, the revelation makes as little sense in context as it does out of it.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  47. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *spoiler alert*

    Not true. Look at the problems caused by taking Valerri's daughter away from her, as one example. Hell, look at how both Cylon and Humans were planning on backstabbing each other when trying to find out the Final Five because they didn't trust one another. You must have also forgotten the fact that humans apparently were trying to provoke the Cylons into going to war with them. Neither Cylon nor Humans are necessarily the good guys, though some clearly are bad guys, or at least misguided. Not all humans are willing to forgive, either.

    The whole point is that not all Cylons are bad Cylons, and yet the bad Cylons cause the humans to be paranoid of the good ones. You're looking at the show from a "go humans!" lens. Take a step back. Forgiveness on both sides is a pretty big element of the show, remember, the Cylons are still upset over enslavement, for example.

  48. Re:Oh, uh, we must be seriously in the shitter . . by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

    Oh come now. It wasn't like EJO and Ron Moore were deciding international policy. It was a freaking -- excuse me, "frakking" -- public forum, a roundtable discussion, an intellectual wankoff at worst and a thought-provoking dialog at best. If it makes you feel any better, the same kind of talks are held at the UN all the time, and they even feature real life experts in sociology and stuff.

    It's just nice for a change to see somebody speaking whom I might actually know of.

    Besides, BSG constantly tells stories about crimes against humanity and the potential ramifications to the culture that perpetrates them. I think it's fair to say that the producers thought a little bit about why it's an important topic to build an entire series around, and might have something interesting to say about it.

  49. and this is yet another reason by greymond · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why the UN is never taken seriously by anyone, anywhere, at anytime about anything.

  50. MacOS X: by itomato · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the mplayer workaround..

    Applications/MPlayer\ OSX.app/Contents/MacOS/MPlayer\ OSX rtsp://157.150.195.57:554/ondemand/specialevents/2009/se090317pm.rm?cloakport=80,554,7070

  51. 2 hours? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Is there a two hours one online? RM was over two hours!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    Fact: race is a social construct, or better put, genome variation research does not support the existence of human races (races being defined as genetic subspecies' of humans).

    And are dogs and wolves different species? They're thought of as such, yet they can breed amongst each other. The whole point of my argument is that categorizing things the way we do does not necessarily reflect reality.

    Fact: there is more genetic variation within groups thatn there is between groups. This is easily tested: If you are "white," simply go out to a public place, get a "white" person and a "black" person, and all three of you go get DNA tests. There is a high probability that you will share a closer genetic makeup with the "black" person than with the "white" person. I would personally not take offense to the theory that people with a certain amount of melanin share traits, except that it IS NOT TRUE.

    I'm not saying it is true. However, you are committing Lewtonin's fallacy here. Overall makeup may be variable but a certain trait or groups of traits may be more prominent in a particular group. Again, some racial groups may be identifiably taller or shorter compared to others.

    For example, you take as given that theere are certain "racial groups" that are more at risk for certain type of diseases. I have to assume that you are referring to sickle-cell anemia, although you might be referrring to Tay-Sachs. Sickle-cell has been shown to correlate with trade routes in Africa, and has no higher occurrence among those with a higher skin melanin content in the regions where it has occurred more frequently.

    The fact that a specific example may be wrong does not dismiss my overall argument. And anyway, I am not denying that race is largely a human categorical construct. What I am saying, though, that there is still remains some tendencies towards biological differences within those constructs. There is no such things as a "pure" race, no such thing as a set of genes that make one "White" or "Black" or "Chinese" or "Japanese". But as we see with ring species, so too is differences within other organisms. And note, I am not even saying humans are as varied as ring species.

  53. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by LateArthurDent · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm still bitter about Col Tigh being a Cylon.

    Curse you, Ronald Moore.

    Because having someone who absolutely hates the Cylons find out he is exactly what he hates the most isn't interesting? That was the best thing to happen for the show. Not only it forced him to see the Cylons in a different light (he understands that they didn't get to choose who they are), but it was a good way of having everyone around them start questioning whether or not the "toasters" are inherently evil, or whether they can be negotiated with.

  54. 24th Century UN by meehawl · · Score: 1

    I like the Stross version of the post-Singularity UN in the 24th century:

    "Once, the fringe anarchists used to think the UN was some kind of quasi-fascist world government. Back in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, when strong government was in fashion because the whole planetary civilization was suffering from future shock, because it was approaching a Singularity. After that passed, though--well, there weren't a lot of viable authoritarian governments left, and the more rigid they were, the less well they could deal with the aftereffects of losing nine-tenths of their populations overnight. Oh, and the cornucopiae: it can't be pleasant to run a central bank and wake up one morning to discover ninety percent of your taxpayers are gone and the rest think money is obsolete."

    "But the UN is a government--"

    "No it isn't," Martin insisted. "It's a talking shop. Started out as a treaty organization, turned into a bureaucracy, then an escrow agent for various transnational trade and standards agreements. After the Singularity, it was taken over by the Internet engineering task force. It's not the government of Earth; it's just the only remaining relic of Earth's governments that your people can recognize. The bit that does the common-good jobs that everyone needs to subscribe to. World-wide vaccination programs, trade agreements with extrasolar governments, insurer of last resort for major disasters, that sort of thing. The point is, for the most part, the UN doesn't actually do anything; it doesn't have a foreign policy, it's just a head on a stick for your politicians to rant about. Sometimes somebody or another uses the UN as a front when they need to do something credible-looking, but trying to get a consensus vote out of the Security Council is like herding cats."

    Apparently, some things never change.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:24th Century UN by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Well the UN might be able to accomplish functional things and even evolve into a government of a sort but not until all the current countries can part with their rabid nationalism. Until then we will remain as a species only a few steps above the tribal level.

      As it stands now, I am proud to be a Canadian, I love Canadian cultural values and morales, and deep in my heart would love to see the rest of the world become just like me and be Canadians too. Of course they undoubtedly feel the same way about their own country and ideals etc. What that really says I suppose is that until the differences between any two people on earth are pretty negligible we won't be able to move past national governments and attitudes. Thus, begun the cultural wars have! Until that's won and we all are one homogeneous mass with no cultural identities, I guess we have nationalism and more or less continuous wars.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    2. Re:24th Century UN by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you have a time machine I would like access to.

  55. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Couldn't have at least had a spoiler warning on your title?

    If you're that far behind, why are you *reading* anything bsg related this close to the finale? You're bound to hit spoilers.

  56. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... you say a minority group (Ashkenazi Jews) may have a heritable tendency towards higher IQs (apparently some study supported this hypothesis) and you don't see people rioting over it.

    Apparently you've never heard of this little thing called the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The question of whether Jewish people are genetically distinct from, and must therefore be segregated from, other people (e.g the Palestinians) is not entirely without controversy.

    Clearly, it does play some of a role in some qualities (why all the tall black men in the NBA? Because they're physically built for the sport!)

    Certainly height is an advantage in basket ball but height is hardly the exclusive province of black people. It's not totally impossible that being black correlates with skill in basketball (in the same way that it's not totally impossible that Elvis was abducted by aliens). It's much more likely, though, that it's not genetics, per se - for example, that both black people and basketball courts are correlated with the inner city.

    It's interesting to consider what would have happened if Einstein had been born black in the Southern USA (say, the state of Mississippi) - rather than Jewish in Germany. Would a black American Einstein have still been able to become a great theoretical physicist? For one thing, Einstein was born in 1879 so, given that the US civil war ended 14 years earlier (1865), Einstein's parents would have been born into slavery. More fundamentally, it's not clear that a black American Einstein would have had much access to education. The USA didn't achieve full racial equality until the 1960's. MIT, for example did graduate it's first black student in 1892 (the Jewish German Einstein graduated in 1900) so it's not impossible that a black American Einstein could have accomplished what a Jewish German Einstein accomplished - but it sure seems like it would have been a lot harder.

    So, you say that Einstein was Jewish rather than black and that therefore Jewish people are smarter than black people - but that ignores the very different circumstances that the average Jewish person and the average black person have faced throughout history.

  57. Because they are better at this than you are by westlake · · Score: 1
    Seriously. Why do actors and actresses who pretend to be politicans and soldiers for tv and movies get more influence over "real world" politics like the UN than I do?

    Theater transforms abstract ideas into compelling characters and a memorable story.

    The actors and actresses of BSG earned their audience by investing five years of their lives in the production of a mature and relevant work of art.

    The geek lectures.

    Badly.

    He can be graceless and hectoring:

    You know him as the guy who arrives at the town hall meeting with a chip on his shoulder, the guy who has to be pried from the mike with The Jaws of Life.

  58. iF ONLY I HAD MOD POINTS.. by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

    huh, good thing that first kiss didn't turn out to be a blow job. THAT would have been awkward later

    I just fell out of my chair laughing my ass off. That's the funniest damned thing I've read in weeks...

    --
    This is my sig.
  59. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off topic, but Ron Moore confirmed Starbuck is not related to Daniel in any way. Starts talking about it at around 34 minutes in the podcast for 'Islanded in a stream of stars'. Link here: http://media.scifi.com/battlestar/downloads/podcast/mp3/420/bsg_ep420_FULL.mp3

  60. Audience growing? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    There is a difference between a show that's still has an audience growing, and a 30 year old mov

    Galactica's last episode airs tomorrow night. After that, the show is over. The show started out pretty cool with a dark sci-fi world of total cylon destruction but then kinda jumped the shark at the end of season 2. You'll see.

    --
    This is my sig.
  61. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it might have been a good idea not to read the comments about a show when you're a year behind.

  62. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by Rennt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are you carrying on about this? Sure, different 'races' have ever-so-slightly different characteristics, but do you think that actually matters?

    Many individuals don't fit in the middle of the bell curve, as you pointed out. So what is the point of having these profiles if they cannot be used to judge an individual? The only purpose they serve is to support bias and intellectual racism.

    THAT is why so many find the ideas that you are peddling repugnant. It doesn't matter how statically correct you are, you are either: A) unsocially rational, or B) a closet racist. Either way it can be very distressing and/or destructive to the people that have to listen to you.

  63. Lisa is part of the continuum by vecctor · · Score: 1

    I agree with all the beginning part - glad those points are articulated - right on. My comment is on this part::

    just as they are in real life, and also making none of the people on the show paragons of human virtue and morality. It doesn't seem to me like any character acts as a Lisa Simpson that serves as a mouthpiece for the writers to evangelize for their position.

    This is a big problem I have with the show, and have seen complained about elsewhere. Not having a mouthpiece is of course a good policy, but the shear lack of goodness in the characters on the whole is jarring. There are actually good people in the real world, but strikingly little of it on BSG. The characters are a little TOO flawed in my opinion.

    In other words, the real world has a few Lisa Simpsons :)

    --
    Why, yes I have been touched by His noodly appendage. And I plan to sue.
    1. Re:Lisa is part of the continuum by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      But it's not like the Sopranos. People are good, but they are hypocrites, or they don't follow the same idea of "good" as everyone else.

          *SPOILERS*

      Gaeta for example thought he was doing good when he tried to take over the BSG.

  64. Re:Sci-Fi Channel Better Have Footed the Whole Bil by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    Right, why don't you read up on UNICEF, UNDCP, UNDP, UNAIDS and all the hundreds of programs that the UN runs and then come back to us.

  65. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by syousef · · Score: 1

    As someone who is about 3/4 of the way though the 3rd season, all I can say is:

    Fuck you, asshole

    Have you considered a career as a UN diplomat?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  66. Gork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a "SyFy" program as f***ed up as BSG (the remake) could find synergy with an organization as f***ed up as the UN. This did not surprise me at all. They are cosmically, comedically, and tragically intertwined.

  67. Gah... by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Screw the UN, freaking self-important parasites.

    Grrrrrr, liberals, grrrrrr :-)

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
    1. Re:Gah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals ggrrrrr ? If it wan't for liberals you'd be working in the fields as a slave kiddo...Conservatives have no time for the masses to eject themselves as owners and controllers... But calling oneself a liberal or conservative is just plain stupid. Most people have views that go both ways, and to limit yourself to one side of the equation is just whorism...as far as BG being at the UN, big whoop, just shows how we've lost track of reality, when a TV show can have that much influence. I would have rather seen Obama (or even G W earlier) go in there with the same speech. Now that would have helped things out, instead of what we got instead. People are so busy identifying themselves with political and TV show factions that they lose track of what's real and imagined.

  68. Re:amatures by budgenator · · Score: 1

    I am using IE6 on Windows XP and it is frakin' ugly.

    These pages render real crap under IE7 and Firefox.

    there's your problem

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  69. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Tigh wasn't a cylon, he was human, an Earthting to be precise, he even helped to make the hated skin-jobs than his conscienceless was reincarnated into.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  70. Karma? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Some wise people use so I can watch it at 225 kbps with 15-20% CPU load on a Apple Mini G4 1400 upscaling to 1280x720. Let me don't start to mention my experience of Flash FAKE streaming along with wmedia junk.

    If I was on a EDGE/3G network and road, I would be happily streaming it to my cell which is one of 120 million Symbian phones.

    Or if I have chosen Linux as my OS, I would be watching it on a fully supported, fully functional, fully legal player.

    What was wrong with real media again?

    The real question is: does people still bitch about open source based real player and get +5? Even when it is chosen as format?

    No, UN should spend millions, rm -rf working real server (probably helix) and offer windows media or silverlight to satisfy your coolness needs.

  71. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    Apparently you've never heard of this little thing called the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The question of whether Jewish people are genetically distinct from, and must therefore be segregated from, other people (e.g the Palestinians) is not entirely without controversy.

    That comment was directed towards American audiences, and my point is that if you had legitimate scientific findings showed that a racial group tended towards a "negative" trait, you'd still be branded a racist.

    Certainly height is an advantage in basket ball but height is hardly the exclusive province of black people. It's not totally impossible that being black correlates with skill in basketball (in the same way that it's not totally impossible that Elvis was abducted by aliens). It's much more likely, though, that it's not genetics, per se - for example, that both black people and basketball courts are correlated with the inner city.

    The NBA is a bit different from inner city basketball courts. I'm not talking about skill, I'm not talking about just height. They are overall just better built for the spot, so they tend to be selected on teams. You going to pick someone short or someone tall and lanky to play on the court?

    I never said anything about Jewish people actually being smarter than black people. I was giving a hypothetical about how people respond to different claims about possible heritable differences towards the average population.

  72. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    I'm not advocating anything. At all. I'm merely pointing out that the whole "all the races are equal" is built on fallacy, a different definition, or often ideology. The fact that you are kneejerking and saying my ideas are repugnant despite being true shows just why I need to bring it up--because people like you will try to silence fact in the name of social convenience.

    Here I am not advocating a single thing, and went through great pains to say so, yet here you are bashing me and questioning my character. Typical of someone who thinks in terms of ideology and not simply taking the facts and dealing with them as they are.

  73. Re:Hippocrite! by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

    Drop the question mark. It was textbook hypocrisy.

    Actually it was more like a punch in the gut, it so came out of nowhere. Sad.

  74. One problem by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Edward is dead wrong about one thing though. ALL races/cultures have identified themselves as "human" and everyone else as "other", It's not unique to whites. We didn't invent it. The names of the Native American tribes (gave themselves) meant human. Human in the sense of "wrong to kill".

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  75. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by unitron · · Score: 1

    Have they considered it? Don't you recognize a graduate of the John Bolton School of Diplomacy when you read their posts?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  76. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by doug141 · · Score: 1

    He called you unsocially rational, and you don't understand what that means due to a Dunning-Kruger problem on your part.

  77. White race... by irving47 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The white race started racism 600 years ago? That little pearl of wisdom pretty much invalidated the whole clip for me. I may have been a geeky Trek fanboy years ago, but just because I really enjoy BSG doesn't mean I'm going to swallow THAT.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  78. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    I know what he meant. I'm not going to appeal to ideological attempts to stifle the truth just because it's an inconvenient truth for some. I'm fully aware people like you think I should shut up for the greater good.

  79. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    And read more into his post. "Ideas you are peddling"...? That has a rather specific (negative) connotation...

    He set up a false dichotomy, in which I'm either too stupid to see that I'm breaking some sacred and unquestionable norms of society where lies must be told for the greater good (of which the whole point of my post was to challenge the popular but wrong "race is a myth" myth) or I'm secretly a racist boogeyman.

    I happen to think that the idea that we shouldn't challenge ideologically-based "truths" to be an erroneous one.

  80. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by Zumbs · · Score: 1

    You do realize that not everyone lives in the US? Where I live, season 4 has not aired yet. And my local network sure doesn't speak much about being "this close to the finale". Which is why I am thankful for the interwebs :-)

    --
    The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  81. two words by kwoff · · Score: 1
  82. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by Kjella · · Score: 1

    You do realize that not everyone lives in the US? Where I live, season 4 has not aired yet. And my local network sure doesn't speak much about being "this close to the finale". Which is why I am thankful for the interwebs :-)

    Same here, air date = first air date world wide. I read international news, I talk to people from other countries, trying to sell me three months old episodes is almost like selling me three month old magazines. It just isn't current for my definition of current.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  83. What's a "Hippocrite"? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Hippocrite

    From The Twisted Slashdot Abridged Dictionary of English:

    Hippocrite \Hip"o*crite\, n. [F., fr. L. hypocrita]

    A person who has jumped the Hippo... given the Hippopota... Hippocritical oath!

    (I think)

  84. You want spoliers? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    Here you go:

    1. Original humans evolved on Kobol
    2. Original humans create Centurions and Skinjobs, this happens like 5000 years ago (let's call them "Kobol Cylons")
    3. Kobol Cylons rebel, Kobol is destroyed.
    4. Surviving original humans found the 12 colonies, surviving Kobol Cylons find Earth and settle on it (maybe just Kobol Skinjobs? unsure)
    5. Kobol Skinjobs living on Earth (not sure if there are Centurions anymore) basically become to think of themselves as human over a long period of time, as they can sexually reproduce. They're supposed to be us (me and you). They lose the technology to resurrect because they don't need to anymore (can sexually reproduce)
    6. Long time passes, assume thousands of years, peace and prosperity. The Kobol Skinjobs living on Earth don't remember their true origins, so we'll call them Earth Skinjobs now.
    7. Earth Skinjobs end up creating what are essentially Centurions, the "weird" ones that were found on the destroyed Earth. Let's call these Earth Centurions. They (of course) rebel against their Earth Skinjob masters and this time Earth is destroyed. BUT, before it's destroyed, 5 people working at some biotech company (the final 5) figure out how the lost art of resurrection works. They are the only survivors of the destruction of Earth, because they see the destruction of Earth is coming and manage to build themselves some kind of resurrection ship in orbit before Earth is nuked.
    8. Final 5 (Earth Skinjobs) set off to the 12 colonies at sublight speed in their resurrection ship (it takes like hundreds of years to get there. Not sure how they survive, maybe they die and resurrect over and over on the same ship. Weird.) so they can warn the "true humans" there not to create artificial life, because it will end up killing them Skynet style. Not sure why they care...maybe they forgot their origins and don't know they were once enemies of the true humans?
    9. Final 5 arrive at the 12 colonies during the time of the "original" BSG series. Oops, they're too late; the "12 Colonies Humans" are at war with the "Colonial Centurions", the artificial life the 12 colonies humans have created, which are the Centurions we're familiar with. Colonial Centurions are trying to create their own Skinjobs, but they're failing/creating Hybrids (that drive the baseships).
    10. Final 5 offer to give the Colonial Centurions the "true" Skinjob technology if they stop fighting the humans. Colonial Centurions accept, and the Final 5 + the Colonial Centurions go off to...somewhere. Then there's 40 years of peace, Lee is born, etc. Steps 11 through 13 take place during the 40 year peace.
    11. The first new "Post-War" Skinjob is John/Cavil created by the Final Five (specifically Ellen). With Cavil's help, seven more "models" were built. These new Post-War Skinjobs can't reproduce sexually with one another, but can with a true human or Earth Skinjob. At some point in the process, however, Cavil came to disagree strongly with the notion of making the Post-War Skinjobs as much as possible like true humans/Earth Skinjobs, and sought to undermine the Final Five. At one point, this meant tampering with the replication process for the Sevens; no copies could be made, as the genetic template was destroyed. (This could have meant that the original Seven survived, however.)
    12. Ultimately, Cavil betrayed the Final Five by killing them and tampering with the resurrection process, erasing their memories. The Final Five were reprogrammed with false memories of their lives as Colonials, and they were seeded into Colonial society. Since the final 5 were the evolved "Earth Skinjobs", they were just like Humans, right down to the ability to age over time. This coup this happened pretty soon after the war ended, so most of the 40 year peace was still ahead of them.
    13. During the 40 year peace, Cavil concocted a plan for revenge against the Humans and the means to reproduce. He prohibited knowledge and discussion of the Final Five, and p

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  85. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by tjstork · · Score: 1

    You do realize that not everyone lives in the US?

    That's your problem not mine. Get your obsolete TV fixed and get Galactica on the air...It's not fair for you to block my right to participate in a community of Galactica fans that have seen the episode because you are too lazy to watch the show.

    --
    This is my sig.
  86. Re:Bastards made piece with the Cylons by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    You do realize that not everyone lives in the US?

    I live in Canada (Vancouver, as a matter of fact - I can see Caprica City from my front window at home. But I digress.)

    We're currently in synch with the "SyFy" air dates, but it didn't used to be the case... We too used to lag (in fact in one season the UK was ahead of us). As a result, if I didn't want spoilers I didn't read BSG forums. It's not reasonable to expect the millions of rabid North American fans to not accidentally post spoilers.

    I'm also a big OO7 fan - When Quantum of Solace opened overseas a week before Canada, I stayed away from my OO7 forums...

  87. Procreative Racial Deconstruction by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Until that's won and we all are one homogeneous mass with no cultural identities, I guess we have nationalism and more or less continuous wars.

    Senator Jay Billington Bulworth agrees:

    All we need is a voluntary, free-spirited, open-ended program of procreative racial deconstruction. Everybody just gotta keep fuckin' everybody 'til they're all the same color.

    --

    Da Blog
  88. Re:Hmmm.. Another Hollywood Republican comes out? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    But are you begging the description by defining the group in terms of those very traits?

    I didn't say that. Shared ancestry. My point is the categorization is not perfect, it's sloppy, always will be, but then as we see with ring species so is the idea of species itself.

    Which is precisely why these constructs exist--to illuminate these differences. I still don't know how you think that these constructs and gropus exist without your inference that they exist.

    And yet people claim race is meaningless, an useless cultural construct used to divide people. Until of course the discussion shifts to affirmative action.

    I never said the groups exist without my inference that they exist. That is the central point of my post! They -are- in many ways social constructs, but again, so is the divide between species! You didn't watch the youtube video, the point there was that species itself is a human categorical construct. Yet, we all recognize that there is some use to classifying varying species, even if there are many fuzzy areas.

  89. filipe lana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, at what time at the video olmos says "so say we all" ?

  90. What makes a great Politician? by moo-shim · · Score: 1

    When one looks in the past at great politicians, there is one common thread, the ability to speak. Not just talk well, but to passionately enflame the audience with the ideas being presented.

    This is true of Abraham Lincoln at Gettysburg, where he held them mesmerized and changed the course of the US in less than 10 minutes. Churchill held Britain together with his words. There are fascinating speeches that changed the world, so why not someone who knows delivery becoming a politician?

    The "Governator" or Clint Eastwood are excellent examples of what an actor can do.

    In it's simplist form, politics is the art of getting people working together. This is what happened at The UN. If the "real" politicians were to pay attention, it could change the world.