Slashdot Mirror


MPAA Says Teachers Should Camcord For Fair Use

unlametheweak recommends an Ars Technica piece detailing the convoluted lengths to which the MPAA will go in order to keep anybody from ripping a DVD, ever. The organization showed a film to the US Copyright Office, in the triennial hearing to spell out exemptions to the DMCA, giving instructions for how a teacher could use a camcorder to record a low-quality clip of a DVD for educational use — even though such a purpose is solidly established in law as fair use. "Never mind that this solution results in video of questionable quality and requires teachers to learn even more tech in order to get the job done. It also requires schools (or, given the way most schools are run, the teachers themselves) to incur additional costs to purchase camcorders and videotapes if they don't have them already. Add in the extra time involved, and this 'solution' is a laughably convoluted alternative to simply ripping a clip from a DVD."

286 comments

  1. Camcorder? Yeah right. by eggman9713 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah, can't do that, teacher might use the camcorder to videotape students in the locker room.

    1. Re:Camcorder? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to get modded down.

    2. Re:Camcorder? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need to get modded left.

    3. Re:Camcorder? Yeah right. by Kuroji · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it too much to ask for these to be modded right?

    4. Re:Camcorder? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, can't do that, teacher might use the camcorder to videotape students in the locker room.

      This is true. You cannot take a camcorder into a UK school. The PC Brigade have teamed up with paedophiles (note spelling USA) to make UK schools HELL. EX - Teacher

    5. Re:Camcorder? Yeah right. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Always modded strange, never charming.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  2. well that explains it... by grapeape · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I know what that guy was doing behind me while I was watching Star Trek yesterday. He was just making a clip for fair use.

    1. Re:well that explains it... by BobSixtyFour · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wish I had an awesome teacher like that. Going into the movie theater in the name of education to capture a clip in the discussion about:

      "the use of special effects in modern star trek movie VS the original movies."

      That and a > 9000 word essay.

    2. Re:well that explains it... by WebScud · · Score: 5, Informative

      In a senior year class we actually used the leaked direct feed bootleg of Episode II to compare the CG to original trilogy and discuss the evolution of technology in film.

    3. Re:well that explains it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You told them to do it. Surprised you didn't earn yourself a troll mod for it though.

  3. This just in: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the MPAA, it is a-okay to use a camcorder to record a movie!

    1. Re:This just in: by mysidia · · Score: 3, Informative

      As long as you own the DVD, and you're using only a short piss-poor-quality recording solely for classroom purposes.

    2. Re:This just in: by SlashWombat · · Score: 1, Informative

      Prior to Vista, you could just snatch the video memory, and re-encode the data back to whatever format you were happy with. Vista, however, will stop you doing that (and presumably so will windows 7)

    3. Re:This just in: by peragrin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize that is because of blue-ray right? The Vista DRM is necessary in order to comply with the blue ray specs and HDCP which requires end to end Drive to display hardware/software copy protection.

      That is why i am glad apple and linux doesn't have blue ray in there stuff. Teachers should be able to use clips of dvd's and other media for teaching. DRM is preventing that.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:This just in: by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

      At my college the professors just play the DVD directly, projected onto a large screen. MPAA be damned.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:This just in: by kbmxpxfan · · Score: 1

      What is this Vista you speak of?

    6. Re:This just in: by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      With cheap 1080p digital camcorders coming out and direct sound input, the quality doesn't have to be bad. Now they MPAA just needs to supply 1080p monitors, school theater rooms and the 1080p digital cameras to all the school. That's going to save them millions in lost sales.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    7. Re:This just in: by garry_g · · Score: 1

      ... but only if you are a teacher ... ;)

    8. Re:This just in: by master811 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, Vista/7 will only stop you from doing that with DRM'd stuff, (which if you didn't have Vista you wouldn't be able to watch anyway), so it's a complete non-issue.

    9. Re:This just in: by master811 · · Score: 1

      Except Apple and linux aren;t able to play back Blu-ray because they don't have that stuff in there. If it wasn't there, you wouldn't be able to watch in it in Vista as well, and it ONLY affects stuff like Blu-ray, there is no affect on non-DRM'd stuff.

    10. Re:This just in: by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Why is that? They didnt specify the type or quality of the camcorder that should be used - nor how the video should be recorded using that camcorder, did they?

      Hmmm... I think maybe getting a really nice camcorder with a high res or digital input to hook directly off the DVD player's output might just work - and get a decent quality too. And still fit in their guidelines.

      Some Sony (pretty sure it was a Sony) I was looking at for a customer has such a setup (so you can merge other clips with what's on the camera to then "edit" into one thing and export to it's drive, memory or external DVD burner...)

    11. Re:This just in: by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that's still got some degradation, but OTOH it takes advantage of the analog hole, which means in the long run it trumps whatever DRM nonsense they can throw at you... short of trusted computing (ick ick ick!).

      --
      $ make available
    12. Re:This just in: by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Except Apple and linux aren;t able to play back Blu-ray because they don't have that stuff in there. If it wasn't there, you wouldn't be able to watch in it in Vista as well, and it ONLY affects stuff like Blu-ray, there is no affect on non-DRM'd stuff.

      I thought it affected DVDs too, including ones made in your own camcorder (i.e. things like young Sebastian's first word etc.).

      --
      $ make available
    13. Re:This just in: by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      And do they really think that ANY of that will stop copies of their movies appearing without the DRM?

      DRM should stand for "Don't Remove Me" - as soon as any "legally-challenged" person sees it, they start trying to remove it. Look at what happened with HL2 and steam - cracked.

      Focus on the customers who are willing to pay, not those who aren't

    14. Re:This just in: by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Macrovision they built into the video output on DVD players in their efforts to plug the analog hole will assure the quality isn't all that decent...

    15. Re:This just in: by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Just wait. They'll figure out a way to implement the equivalent of TV-B-Gone into the projected image somehow that causes all camcorders to turn themselves off.

      In fact, I'm surprised they haven't mandated that every new camera contain firmware such that the detection of brown dots in the camera's field of view forces the camera to lock itself down (possibly also emit an alarm) so that it won't release the tape or other memory or do any other recording until turned in to a copyright enforcement office^W^W^W repair service. Of course, only surveillance cameras will be immune to this requirement.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    16. Re:This just in: by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I've never tried this with a DVD, but if you use two VCRs from the same manufacturer, you could copy VHS tapes that had that macrovision crap. The copy still had macrovision of course, but you got your copy.

      The things you learn when you use a VCR that can't play tapes as a tuner on a TV that has a broken RF tuner, and plug a second VCR into the tuner VCR :)

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  4. Kind of like... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

    requiring you to defend yourself from a wild boar with a knife, even if you have a gun, just because it is not legal to have a gun where you live. (Even if you don't happen to have a knife.)

    BTW, like the MPAA, wild boars are vicious.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Kind of like... by Sique · · Score: 3, Funny

      As someone who lives in a region with many wild boars, I have to say:

      If you ever manage to behave that badly that a wild boar feels enclined to attack you, I would trust you neither with a knife able to kill a boar, nor with a gun.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Kind of like... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 0

      We only use knifes when we take dogs. Its pretty easy to kill a boar with a knife, and I have never been "tusked" badly. Its also cheaper. When my Dad was hunting they used their fists.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    3. Re:Kind of like... by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      We only use knifes when we take dogs. Its pretty easy to kill a boar with a knife, and I have never been "tusked" badly. Its also cheaper. When my Dad was hunting they used their fists.

      Boars have fists in your area ? Where are you hunting, Tchernobyl ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:Kind of like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I take it you've never stumbled upon a female wild boar with her young? Better bring the gun or be really fast.

    5. Re:Kind of like... by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spear hunting for wild boar -- now THERE's a real sport.

    6. Re:Kind of like... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      like the MPAA, wild boars are vicious

      and apparently, stronger than they are intelligent.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Kind of like... by Erikderzweite · · Score: 3, Funny

      >Boars have fists in your area ? Where are you hunting, Tchernobyl ?

      Wall Street.

    8. Re:Kind of like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several varieties of "wild boar" (at least in N. America). Some are viscous and will attack for seemingly no reason (though likely because they're surprised that you stumbled on them) and some are unconcerned with you or will run from you.

      What lots of people call "wild boar" are actually ferrel hogs that have escaped from farms somewhere back in their ancestral line then bred with other wild pigs until they are monstrous sized beast with curled tusks. These (at least the ones I've seen) aren't particularly mean unless you provoke them. The smaller natively wild boars with up turned tusks are however as mean as the MPAA and will charge you given half a chance. YMMV, I've been told about all sorts of wild pigs but those are the two I've come in contact with.

    9. Re:Kind of like... by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 1

      Get out of here, S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Get out of here, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

    10. Re:Kind of like... by Kozz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Boar market?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    11. Re:Kind of like... by cheftw · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are several varieties of "wild boar" (at least in N. America). Some are viscous...

      God help us all

      --
      Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
    12. Re:Kind of like... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But wild boars are delicious if cooked right.

      And while stewing the MPAA and its lawyers would make some funny pastime, I doubt I'd want a pice of it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Kind of like... by Sique · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just keep the distance.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    14. Re:Kind of like... by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      actually, it has nothing to do with cross breeding. once a pig is let loose, it rather quickly goes through a drastic physical change and regains it's "wildness" pigs are very interesting that way. http://blog.mlive.com/flintjournal/outdoors/2007/11/domestic_pigs_quickly_revert_t.html yeah, i'm lazy, that's just the first link google came up with.

    15. Re:Kind of like... by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      There are several varieties of "wild boar" (at least in N. America). Some are viscous...

      God help us all

      ... lest we be killed by slow-moving, sticky boars.

      --
      $ make available
    16. Re:Kind of like... by taucross · · Score: 1

      By Cyric's curse! A gelatinous bloarb!

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    17. Re:Kind of like... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Just keep the distance.

      Tried that once, except the damn thing kept invading my camp and stealing my stuff.

      And the polar bears. Don't get me started about the polar bears.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  5. Photocopying by basementman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given the technology skills most my teachers have had I can see them trying to put the dvd inside a photocopier and hoping for the best. Your average teacher couldn't rip a DVD, and why bother when you can just get any notable clip you want off youtube. Go fight with Google MPAA.

    1. Re:Photocopying by lostguru · · Score: 3, Informative

      Putting aside the fact that almost every teacher I have or have had in highschool with the exception of a few have been able to rip video clips off dvds, and the ones who couldn't would simply have student who was bright enough do it for them. Most schools/districts these days block youtube as well as facebook, myspace, etc, for reasons unknown as it seems to only serve the purpose of annoying teachers and students. Wonderful fun, our district also chooses to block many useful linux/programming sites as they could be used for hacking. SSH tunnels work for bypassing, but only if you're smart enough to get one set up.

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    2. Re:Photocopying by honkycat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People will always be able to rip DVDs. It doesn't matter if the law allows the circumvention or not, it's a cracked technology.

      However, if the law DOES allow it, that opens the door for legitimate businesses to manufacture and sell tools to make it easy for educators to copy clips. That's one of the reasons why it's so important that it be legal.

    3. Re:Photocopying by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Before the MPAA screwed it up, there was free easy-to-use point-and-click software readily available.

    4. Re:Photocopying by X0563511 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't mean to be rude, but SSH tunnels and proxies are not that hard to handle, once you know that the tools exist.

      I think the harder part is having a good server to use them on... but even then there are things you can use.

      That's the problem. The information to bypass these blocks isn't hard to grasp - it's hard to find.

      In an effort to help this, my solution:

      SSH out to home or a free shell account. Tunnel the ports as needed. Use tinyproxy on the remote end, and set your browser to use this proxy through the tunnel.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Photocopying by lostguru · · Score: 1

      Yes it's extremely simple, but most of the school is more worried about their social life or SATs scores to really be looking for the information

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    6. Re:Photocopying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh you go through a lot of work. ssh -D and I have an instant socks proxy. Works in putty as well

    7. Re:Photocopying by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      When they start breeding, they develop an uncanny ability to work with motion picture media.
      In the old days, they'd put together slide shows and 8mm films to bore you. Now they produce DVDs with soundtracks and fading titles and overdubs and star wipes, and it's no less boring.

      Believe me, the most technologically inept person, school teacher or not, somehow figures this stuff out, the instant they spawn a larva.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:Photocopying by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      People will always be able to rip DVDs. It doesn't matter if the law allows the circumvention or not, it's a cracked technology.

      However, if the law DOES allow it, that opens the door for legitimate businesses to manufacture and sell tools to make it easy for educators to copy clips. That's one of the reasons why it's so important that it be legal.

      And there's the, admittedly, side issue of the minority users who still theoretically cannot watch DVDs because of the structure of the market.
      Of course even if I did get a great DVD player with my Linux distribution of choice, I'd probably still go with a native hacked player because the dvdnav lib skips a few "mandatory" bits like forced displays (no you cannot skip forward or to the menu from here) and so on.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    9. Re:Photocopying by peragrin · · Score: 1

      However not all blueray discs are cracked.

      DVD's will be around for another decade however blue ray is already here and limiting opportunities.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    10. Re:Photocopying by TheStonepedo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reasons unknown? If my boss blocked Facebook and YouTube fewer idiots would be wasting time they should be spending doing billable work for our clients. The schools' blocking open source sites for fear of hacking is disappointing, but your suggestion that social networking and flash video websites serve some useful purpose is ridiculous. I wish you luck getting programming and open source sites to kids, but try leave pointless time-wasters out of your argument when defending your suggestion in front of the school board. Unless the computer lab has overtaken the entire library, students may be able to use librarians (who as resources go are nearly as good as Google) to locate books (which as information goes is nearly as good as a website) for their educational endeavors.

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    11. Re:Photocopying by pyite · · Score: 1

      If my boss blocked Facebook and YouTube fewer idiots would be wasting time they should be spending doing billable work for our clients.

      Maybe your boss should hire fewer idiots? Just a thought...

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    12. Re:Photocopying by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That seems to be a 'ssh' specific option. One would probably have to use something like putty, since cygwin is a bit heavy to sneak onto school computers.

      I'm glad that BS is behind me now.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Photocopying by DeadChobi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I disagree with your assertion that Youtube videos can't be educationally relevant. Try getting the equipment to actually have students go outside and observe the sun in a high school. Then try checking out these clips:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB7W385a-tM
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbGD_9aPTK0&feature=related
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwn_Y3990wQ&feature=related

      And I defy you to find a school where their library is as well-stocked with information on diverse subjects as the internet. Most school libraries have vast sections of Juvenille literature, and are so small that the Dewey Decimal system is still relevant and useful to them. The librarian is more likely to point the students to the internet, because the source material one can get from a good google search or series of searches is far more timely, more likely to be relevant, and much quicker to access.

      I really think you actually need to do some research about the educational uses of the Internet before spouting off the opinion that video is a pointless time-waster and that books are the only real source of useful information.

      --
      SRSLY.
    14. Re:Photocopying by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So basically, without legality, rips will only be used for recreational purposes, not educational?

      OMG, rips are like drugs!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Photocopying by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Yep, another reason it's important to ensure that legality matches morality (to the extent that there's relevant intersection between the two, maybe I really mean legality is a superset of morality). Of course, I believe that, given time, Blueray will be cracked in some fashion. Still, that's a massive waste of resources that could be better spent in some manner that benefits humanity.

    16. Re:Photocopying by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Important point. More than a side issue, I'd say. It's one thing for the DVD producers not to actively support your platform of choice. It's quite another for them to ensure that you can't legally make use of their DVD product without buying another product that they've sponsored. There's some hints of monopoly abuse there...

    17. Re:Photocopying by prelelat · · Score: 1

      I do IT work for the school district where I'm from. I can tell you right now that things like youtube are usually blocked for bandwidth constraints. We have the ability for teachers to authenticate to the server and access streaming websites and radio but limiting that connection helps with bandwidth usage. If you have 50+ people on youtube at one time you would notice a slowdown over the network(not everywhere has been upgraded to gigabit). Also schools typically don't see the educational value in the average youtube video where someone get's whacked in the nuts.

      I do agree if a teacher doesn't know how to rip a clip from a dvd they know someone who does. Teachers at least around here not only know someone inside their school that could do it, but the ones in elementary, network to teachers outside of their school to others to get help. Not to mention I've done some of that work for them(making sure it's fair use)

    18. Re:Photocopying by Strake · · Score: 1

      However, if the law DOES allow it, that opens the door for legitimate businesses to manufacture and sell tools to make it easy for educators to copy clips.

      dd

    19. Re:Photocopying by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      PuTTY has the same functionality. Can't remember the exact menu you pick the option under but works just like the standard ssh program.

      I have PuTTY Portable and FireFox Portable set to use the proxy on my flash drive, so I'm good where ever I go :)

    20. Re:Photocopying by lostguru · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately your school district is ahead of the game on network management, our teachers have now way of accessing a blocked site as nobody at the school has the password to bypass it. The one guy who does is mostly unreachable, and judging by the way it is setup (blocking portions of government sites, the obama campaign site, etc) an idiot.

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    21. Re:Photocopying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your two posts in this discussion show a really bad understanding of grammar. I imagine you are drunk, but if you're sober, please stay away from the kids.

    22. Re:Photocopying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear to drunk I'm not god officer!

    23. Re:Photocopying by Daryen · · Score: 1

      I block youtube as well as facebook, myspace, etc on my network.

      Youtube has clips that are unfit for young children. Parents need only the slightest excuse to sue these days, and whose job do you think will be forfeit in an attempt to appease them?

      It's CYA in it's purest form.

  6. For starters by DarkNinja75 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It might help if we didn't call it "ripping."

    1. Re:For starters by siddesu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why? mafiaa was fighting it when it was called "time-shifting", etc.

      you should recognize what you see -- this is mafiaa fighting against fair use, because to them there is no such thing.

    2. Re:For starters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's not so much that the MPAA would allow it if the name was different, but that it would probably improve public perception

    3. Re:For starters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell are you, Michael Eisner?

    4. Re:For starters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes -- "copying" would be much better. ;)

  7. not surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    only in america...

    1. Re:not surprised. by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Not if the MPAA has its way.

    2. Re:not surprised. by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      only in america...

      The MPAA is in just about every country in the world. It merely gives itself different names. I.e., in Canada the MPAA calls itself the CMPDA (Canadian Motion Picture Distributors Association).

      It is the Canadian counterpart of the MPAA with effectively identical membership and a derivative logo.

      - Ref. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMPDA

      The MPAA is as widespread around the world as the Swine Flu.

    3. Re:not surprised. by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

      I didn't think the swine flu was spread that widely.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    4. Re:not surprised. by Aerynvala · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or costs quite as much to get rid of.

      --
      http://transformativeworks.org/
    5. Re:not surprised. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Or did that much damage to the general wellbeing or GNP.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:not surprised. by masmullin · · Score: 1

      hopefully.

  8. Ripping a DVD by moon3 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    to keep anybody from ripping a DVD

    Strong naming could easily upset (EliteTorrents or PirateBay can confess).

    DVD backup could have been less of a target.

    to keep anybody from creating backup of a DVD

    Pretty decent and disarming.

    1. Re:Ripping a DVD by roesti · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, you could just describe it as "to increase the cost of a teacher playing a DVD in a classroom for legally-permitted educational purposes" and get straight to the point...

    2. Re:Ripping a DVD by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Strictly speaking, at least in the US, there is a significant difference between a "rip" and a "backup". By "rip" it is almost always meant a video file produced by breaking CSS and re-encoding the contents of the DVD. That would fall foul of the DMCA(which sucks; but it is pretty clear).

      A "backup" would just be a copy, bit-for-bit of the DVD, which the MPAA and friends obviously don't want you to make, and you would probably get in trouble for distributing; but in no way violates the DMCA. (incidentally, this part is why DVD piracy started well before CSS was broken. Since anybody with a DVD player can decode CSS crippled disks, a pirate simply has to clone the disk, not break the crypto)

    3. Re:Ripping a DVD by unlametheweak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strictly speaking, at least in the US, there is a significant difference between a "rip" and a "backup".

      I don't think so. Even Microsoft's Windows Media Player has a large "Rip" button in the middle of its menu, right beside the "Backup" button. "Rip" is to extract audio and/or video (to a hard drive). "Backup" is to burn it. I checked the Wikipedia also, which seems to agree with me.

    4. Re:Ripping a DVD by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

      A "backup" would just be a copy, bit-for-bit of the DVD, which the MPAA and friends obviously don't want you to make, and you would probably get in trouble for distributing; but in no way violates the DMCA. (incidentally, this part is why DVD piracy started well before CSS was broken. Since anybody with a DVD player can decode CSS crippled disks, a pirate simply has to clone the disk, not break the crypto)

      Except that currently available DVD burners don't burn the part of the disk where the keys are stored, so the (encrypted) backup won't play in a DVD player.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Ripping a DVD by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      No, "backup" is to create a second copy for use in case the original is altered or destroyed. You can easily make a backup to your hard drive as a DVD image and that is still a backup. The parent's description is still accurate.

    6. Re:Ripping a DVD by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Is this true? I've just stripped the CSS as a matter of course when making my backups. I also strip out PUOs and all that other bullshit too. Can't say I've ever tried to make a straight copy.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Ripping a DVD by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      No, "backup" is to create a second copy for use in case the original is altered or destroyed.

      You aren't making sense here (where you say "no") because you are obviously agreeing with me when you state that

      "backup" is to create a second copy for use in case the original is altered or destroyed.

      To elaborate I will give a quote from the Microsoft help file of Windows Media Player 11:

      You can rip (or copy) tracks from your audio CDs onto your computer with Windows Media Player, after which the songs that you rip become files on your computer.

      And from Wikipedia (the American version):

      Ripping is the process of copying audio or video content to a hard disk, typically from removable media or media streams. Originally, the term is an acronym for "Raster Image Processing"[citation needed] and referred specifically to image scanning. The word is now used to refer to all forms of media.

      - Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripping

      In no way does Microsoft break the DMCA as the original posters' definition of the word "rip" would have people believe.

    8. Re:Ripping a DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that the decrypt was in some way coupled with the volume serial number, and some other special magic to make a bit-for-bit dupe impossible. EG, you cant just drop a DVD into a system with a burner and a reader, and do the 'Copy disk' process. You HAVE to strip the CSS, then re-encode the CSS for the new volume, or that has been my experience. (Assuming you even WANT CSS...)

      I could just be blowing smoke though. I just know you cant just disk to disk a DVD. The resulting disk wont play.

    9. Re:Ripping a DVD by kimvette · · Score: 1

      That would fall foul of the DMCA(which sucks; but it is pretty clear).

      Bypassing encryption/protection/DRM for the purpose of interoperability is perfectly legal. In this case, the interoperability required is backup software for the fair use copy. Ergo, interoperability issue. :-D

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    10. Re:Ripping a DVD by profplump · · Score: 2, Informative

      The key is written to the disk as regular data, and if you could copy the entire disk it would just work, but the CSS key region is not writable on typical DVD media, nor by typical DVD drives.

      If you have the ability to press new DVDs though -- like a commercial pirate might -- you can simply duplicate the disk as-is without decoding or re-encrypted anything. That's how the thing was produced in the first place.

    11. Re:Ripping a DVD by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      The part I was drawing attention to was you saying that to back something up is to burn it. You do not have to burn the data to a disk for it to be a backup. The poster you were arguing with stating that the difference between "rip" and "backup" was whether or not the data was converted to another format or simply a bit-to-bit copy.

      Converting a DVD to another format (ripping) means that you are removing the DRM (which violates the DMCA), but making a bit-to-bit copy (including the original DRM) and saving it to your hard drive (even if you don't burn it) is a "backup" and is in no way in violation of the DMCA.

    12. Re:Ripping a DVD by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Converting a DVD to another format (ripping) means that you are removing the DRM (which violates the DMCA)

      My understanding is that if the License allows you to rip the disk then the person is not violating the DMCA, and that if the disk has no DRM associated with it then it is not against the DMCA to rip the disk. As well, you said that "Converting a DVD to another format (ripping) means that you are removing the DRM" which is not always the case, like when the disk does not have any DRM attached to it.

    13. Re:Ripping a DVD by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Why does nero have the ability to rip DVDs if it is illegal?

    14. Re:Ripping a DVD by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      The groups that make unauthorized 'counterfeit' copies of dvd's use commercial dvd pressing equipment, not consumer dvd burners.

      Also note that consumer dvd burners would be quite happy to burn the areas where the keys are stored, however all blank consumer dvd-rs have these areas 'burned out' specifically to prevent that.

    15. Re:Ripping a DVD by bjb · · Score: 1
      Increase the cost to the teacher? Oh no.

      Whatever you might think about how much we're over/underfunding our school system, there is a real fact that teachers (at least in the US public school system) end up paying probably around $1000 out of their pocket for materials such as (get this) copy paper, dry erase markers, graph paper, pencils, etc. You know, the things that they need to teach a kid math. Sure, they can write some of this off on their taxes, but that is hard capped at $250 a year. Now add to this that teachers are paid less than garbage men (at least in New York City) and great! Let's make sure the MPAA gets their extra money while teaching their kids.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  9. The MPAA went on to say that by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Teachers may also make partial copies of a CD for education purposes by recording to a vinyl record and playing it back on a phonograph.

    --
    God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    1. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That video was great! I think I'm going to watch all movies from a conference room tape of a tape of a DVD from now on.

    2. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by Plazmid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well at one point someone devised a way to store video on phonograph discs so...

    3. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Teachers may also make partial copies of a CD for education purposes by recording to a vinyl record and playing it back on a phonograph.

      It appears that part of the rationale behind the MPAA doing this is:
      1) To keep any copies (copied fair-use clips, no less) of marginal quality so as to increase the (theoretical) value of an actual DVD. Dubious logic here, if that is part of the reasoning. If that were the case they could more logically argue to keep low quality copies (in general) of MPAA IP legal for educational purposes, no matter how it is derived (from ripping software or through cam-cording).
      2) Try and prevent the spread of DVD-circumvention devices. Dubious logic again since it would probably be more efficient to by an extra DVD (or use the original if possible) and just bookmark the appropriate scenes for classroom viewing rather than to buy blank tape and maintain video equipment. Of course you can't un-invent DeCSS, nor can the MPAA go back in time and assassinate DVD Jon or people like him, so trying to stop DVD copying is fruitless and will only punish people and hinder schools, etc from making back-ups, fair-use clips, etc. The logic here is as senseless as the people who want to fight the War on Drugs.
      3) They've already argued against cam-cording in non-educational settings (like movie-theaters), so it seems like they just have too much time and money on there hands and just want to be difficult. These are people who have power, and want to get as much out of it as they can. They seem to be enjoying themselves. My two cents here.

    4. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by mysidia · · Score: 1

      No, vinyl is too high-quality. They have to use cassette tapes.

    5. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Ahem. You seem to have that bass-ackwards. Top quality cassette tape is superior to top quality vinyl - AND much cheaper. Vinyl is played back with one single needle, while a good cassette recorder/player has multiple heads. Even my ancient reel-to-reel had multiple heads. (5 I think, maybe 7 - but I'm not digging it out just to check) Perhaps you meant to compare vinyl to 8-track. Those 8-tracks were a pile of pig shit, which is why I never owned one.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I found cassette tapes to always have horrible hissing as background noise, no matter how expensive the tapes or player were...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by rickthewizkid · · Score: 1

      Well then, my old school would have PLENTY of equipent to play it back on. We even had a 90 year old projector to play back any old Itchy and Scratchy films too!

    8. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by soundguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are either trolling or seriously retarded.

      Standard audio cassette tape travels at 1 7/8 ips (inches of tape per second past the heads) and is complete and total SHIT. No amount of DBS/Dolby "magic" and expensive playback electronics can fix that. Audio cassettes have the lowest fidelity of any analog format in history and only the mega-stoned could tolerate listening to them. 8-tracks ran at 3 3/4 ips. Twice as fast. That means twice the headroom, twice the high frequency information, and half the tape noise. Consumer reel-to-reel ran at 3 3/4 and 7 1/2 ips for another doubling of quality. Semi-pro machines ran at 7 1/2 and 15 ips. Pro machines ran at 15 and 30 ips. (at $200 per reel for 2" multitrack tape, studios didn't run at 30ips much, usually just for jazz and classical)

      The number of heads above 3 had fuck-all to do with anything. Having separate heads for playback, recording, and erase allowed the magnetic gap to be optimized for a single task. Cassettes were 2-sided and expensive decks often had more heads but only so you didn't have to flip the tape or move the heads to play the other side. It was still a $100 saddle on a $10 horse.

      Cassette tape is so insanely inferior to vinyl that I won't even dignify your comparison by responding. I'm guessing your only experience with a turntable involved mangled children's records on a battery-operated "record player" adorned with Disney characters.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    9. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by u38cg · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Thanks for providing the rant that I was just about to :)

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    10. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by funkatron · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying you're wrong but you don't seem to have included any information about the quality of either medium (Dynamic range, frequency response, distortion etc).

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    11. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you listen to their testimony at the hearings, it's weirder.

      They seem to think that because it passes through the analog realm, camcording isn't actually circumvention of CSS, so the CSS is left intact on the disk as an "extremely effective" (direct quote) technological measure, even though they also acknowledge that tools to circumvent it in the digital realm are "readily available".

      It's like they know the battle is utterly lost, but still don't want to give up their useless copy protection technology by granting this legal exception to anti-circumvention measures.

    12. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to go look at the signal to noise ratio for both vinyl and cassette.
      The cassette was an atrocious medium for music. Reel to reel is a totally different kettle of fish, 4 times wider track run at 4-16 times the speed for a sound quality that was 16-64 times better than a cassette.

    13. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The number of heads doesn't mean jack sh***. Tape speed is low, and the dynamic range of cassettes are horrible compared to other technologies.

      Under proper conditions, the quality of good Vinyl generally exceeds the sound quality of CDs.

      Better frequency response, better dynamic range in practice, less distortion (assuming you don't have dirt or dust in the LP or on your read head).

    14. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Standard audio cassette tape travels at 1 7/8 ips (inches of tape per second past the heads) and is complete and total SHIT

      There is nothing like a good scientific detailing of an inferior product.

    15. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get real.
      Physics and the size of atoms says you are wrong. Even reading a "perfect" vinyl with an electron microscope you will not even come close to what is possible on a CD for ANY of the things you listed.

    16. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Where does one acquire old Itchy and Scratchy reels?

    17. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by cool_story_bro · · Score: 1

      Cassette tape is so insanely inferior to vinyl that I won't even dignify your comparison by responding.

      Oh, well that's good to hear... hey wait a minute!

      --
      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.
    18. Re:The MPAA went on to say that by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing your only experience with a turntable involved mangled children's records on a battery-operated "record player" adorned with Disney characters.

      More likely his experience is with anything other than brand-new vinyl straight out of the shrink wrap. Top-quality new records sound better than top-quality new cassettes for what, maybe 20 play-throughs? Vinyl deteriorates rapidly with both time and usage. I don't know about you, but I never heard surface noise from a dusty cassette.

      --
      ResidntGeek
  10. In related news by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    ThePirateBay.org registers the domain TheTeacherBay.org

    1. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting TeacherTube

  11. Ewwwww WTF? by jdong · · Score: 1

    I know the MPAA is evil but sheesh, even for them, asking teachers to make dirty movies of themselves is a step too far!


    *goes to read the summary*

  12. MPAA Graciousness and Generosity by eyepeepackets · · Score: 4, Funny

    One would expect the MPAA to suggest teachers use pantomime since this would please both themselves and the RIAA.

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    1. Re:MPAA Graciousness and Generosity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The American Mime Association has been notified of your suggestion and is considering legal action.

    2. Re:MPAA Graciousness and Generosity by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're not going to say anything.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:MPAA Graciousness and Generosity by pm_rat_poison · · Score: 1

      And publicly reproduce their works, or create a derivative work?? Nonono, if RIAA and MPAA had their way, you wouldn't be able to sing along listening to your CD's outside the house because that is public reproduction, or even talk during dinner about the movie you just saw with your date, because that is a derivative work!

    4. Re:MPAA Graciousness and Generosity by masmullin · · Score: 1

      they might be saying something, but we simply cannot hear them because they are in that impenetrable sound-proofed box!

  13. I must take the MPAAs side on this issue by erroneus · · Score: 1

    If only so that I may attempt to show other possible logical and reasonable perspectives on the matter.


    Uh... got nothing...

    1. Re:I must take the MPAAs side on this issue by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      I will give you one. MPAA want to remove every legal reason for copying DVD. If you have no reason to legally copy DVD you don't need tools for it so we can make all DVD ripping software illegal. Right now you can say that you have DVD ripper because you are a teacher and you need one for educational purposes.

      Remove legal uses of rippers and you can safely state that this software can be used only for stealing and as such should be made illegal.

  14. Good! by mister_playboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm glad for ridiculous crap like this, because the more groups that end up on the target list of the MAFIAA's tactics, the sooner something will be done to redress the abuses of our society and our freedoms they have perpetuated in the name of copyright.

    People apparently have to feel the heat themselves in order to see the wrong in the MAFIAA's ways.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    1. Re:Good! by edmazur · · Score: 1

      People apparently have to feel the heat themselves in order to see the wrong in the MAFIAA's ways.

      People apparently have to feel the heat themselves in order to see the wrong in the (insert group) ways.

    2. Re:Good! by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt something will be done anytime soon.

      OTOH I do not see why teachers would be an exception. They should teaching us stuff, including what is right and what is wrong. Where did I do my first copyright violations? Yep, many many years before the Internet was available. I did it by making copies of books.

      Not only did I do that, my teacher told me to do so. Even then I knew something wrong was going on, as the first copy I was sure to make was the copyright notice. I thought it was pretty ironic. I also thought that it was allowed, because my teacher told me to do so.

      So if making copies is legal, what is all the fuzz about? In my mind if I do not make money of it by selling the copies, it s OK. (Luckily my government things about the same).

      So the teachers taught me wrong and as everybody knows, making copies is a stepping stone thing. One day you make a copy of your CD so it won't scratch and before you know it, you sell crack to kids to finance the terrorists.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Good! by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The more intelligent and motivated university graduates tend to be the least likely to enter K-12 education.

      The more intelligent and motivated school teachers tend to be the least likely to seek positions with decision making authority.

      The teachers I know rarely acknowledge any of this as their own failures or shortcomings. They also tend to portray themselves as victims of an unfair system.

      If you've been reading me on slashdot, you know I'm fairly consistent in my view that a person in a position with limited authority who complains about the authority he is under, should accept some responsibility for being in that position.

      Don't tell me about what an idiot your boss is. Explain why he's up there and you're down here, in terms of what you're doing to resolve that problem.

      I've worked in education, and I've worked in IT, so don't try to tell me I don't know what it's like.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait... are we talking the real Mafia, or the MPAA? I'd kinda like to know, because, I do value my life. Not that I don't also value quality movies...

    5. Re:Good! by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 3, Funny

      First you start out stealing songs, then you're robbing liquor stores, and selling crack, and running over school kids with your carrrrrrrrr.....

      So don't download this song... </wierd al>

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    6. Re:Good! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      In some countries, it is extremely difficult to fire a bad teacher...
      So you give a bad teacher a really good reference and hope they will get hired somewhere else, usually to a more senior position which pays more money so they have incentive to go. Also in a position with more power they are likely to do less actual teaching.

      A good teacher on the other hand, will be held onto by the school and kept where they provide the most value - teaching, without giving them additional responsibility that would take away from their ability to teach.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Good! by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      WDEP baby.

    8. Re:Good! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Do I have to follow the steps, or could I just run over the kids? I'm not really interested in the liquor store or selling crack, but the rest sounds cool.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP

  15. It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Talk is cheap. How are they going to back it up? It's not like they can walk onto school grounds and force teachers to abide by this arbitrary policy that has no legal weight whatsoever.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    1. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by pwizard2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry about double-posting, but I just remembered something else: how would the teacher's union react to this? I'm not very fond of unions, but this time it would be a good thing to have on our side. The teachers union holds quite a bit of clout in government and they probably wouldn't put up with BS like this. Their argument would probably be something along the lines of that teachers are [rightfully] too busy to waste their time recording movies with a camcorder just to please the movie industry. The MPAA would probably back down even if they got their way and then had to take on the unions.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    2. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by R.Morton · · Score: 1

      I Agree completely, in fact I can remember Instances in School were a lot of classes Social studies, Science mainly had a video taped shows that the teacher had recorded earlier in the week.

      in fact on the screen it clearly said that it was okay to tape the program for educational or institutional use only and had to be erase by no later than one year after it's original recorded date.

      and that was around 1984 or so when I was in Grade School in Nashville TN (Davidson County) at John.R.Bass Elementary School.

      What the hell Happened to that ?.

      man I have seen low but that is low MPAA can burn in hell they are taking away a great tool, I can't count how many times I was Happy to see we had a film on ancient cultures because like the History Channel they make it interesting.

      students are more likely to learn when they are stimulated with an interesting televised presentation rather than a boring 23 pages of dry text.

      R.Morton
       

      --
      modded quote "what's that he's talking about? Windows , Never had a problem with Windows till I tried to use it."
    3. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, I suspect that their argument would be far simpler: current American copyright law contains a specific exemption for limited copying for educational purposes. The MPAA can complain all it wants, but the law is on our side.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I Agree completely, in fact I can remember Instances in School were a lot of classes Social studies, Science . . .

      I see in fact can Remember no English clases.

    5. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by supernova_hq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For now...

    6. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by twidarkling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, it's the DMCA that's the issue, not Fair Use.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    7. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Copyright law gives an exemption for copying. But the DMCA has no parallel exemption, so it's not legal to decrypt the content in order to create the copy.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    8. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, wut? They have schools in Nashville? They had them way back in 1984? Is this revisionist history at work, or what?

    9. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I wonder what will happen when a case comes up revolving around the conflict between the two laws.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by Imrik · · Score: 1

      Although if you think about it, playing the DVD in order to record it with a camcorder requires decrypting it as well. If you can decrypt it to record it in that way, you can just take the video stream and record that instead.

    11. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Well, if no one has respect for the law (the DMCA, in this case) then it is a bad law and should be revoked.

      I know I'm preaching to the choir on that one....

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    12. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

      Universal v. Reimerdes, the DeCSS case, already examined this issue and came to the same conclusion: camcording would not unlawfully circumvent.

    13. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      They are specifically trying to get the 'legal weight' - they showed this at the DMCA 'review of exceptions' to try to stop the exception for educational use from being renewed.

    14. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by penguinbrat · · Score: 1

      ...but the law is on our side.

      And the money is on theirs, which has a funny way of making/changing these laws...

    15. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by penguinbrat · · Score: 1

      Kind of reminds me what they got the Universities around the country to start doing - it only took the top Universities with some major $$$ and legal weight/expertise behind them to actually stand up to them (IIRC) - from my understanding, at least the local ISD's neither has anything close to the $$$ nor the legal weight/expertise behind them... I'm not saying the Universities dumped a lot of money into fighting them, but it did take some serious legal expertise to even consider standing up to them - and it goes back to the ISD's having neither..

    16. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Thank you, but that's not what I meant. What I want to know is, does the fair use provision of the copyright law create an exemption to the DCMA, even though not explicitly stated?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    17. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by tepples · · Score: 1

      does the fair use provision of the copyright law create an exemption to the DCMA, even though not explicitly stated?

      I seem to remember that the answer in Universal v. Reimerdes was no, because camcording was available as an option.

    18. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Teachers actually are specifically afforded the right to keep video-taped copies of television shows for up to 30 days for educational purposes. And if you do it right, teaching with a television show can be far more insightful and relevant than teaching using a textbook. It requires a teacher to point out the relevance and connection to the curriculum though. So if your teacher just had you guys sit through an hour of recorded film without any sort of processing or output then you probably didn't learn a whole lot from it.

      Incidentally, teachers are also allowed to make copies of manuscripts, provided that the copy doesn't significantly reduce the value of the original work, that the copy is for educational purposes, that it would be difficult to obtain original copies of the manuscript, and that the copies made are destroyed within 60 days.

      --
      SRSLY.
    19. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Can someone give that guy an insightful mod?

      "The law is on our side" has never been as weak as it is today. Nothing changes faster than a law standing in the way of corporate money making.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hypothetic question: Could I order a copy from abroad, where the DMCA means jack, where such decryption could be done, in order to create the snippet I need for my class?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by R.Morton · · Score: 1

      No, I was just saying that like todays schools that use the History channel and The Learning channel, we had educational Public programming that our teacher could record and use for up to one year.

      we had programs like :Science with Mrs Mattson, Social Studies: science of human interaction Ect.

      and yes we had TV in 1984 imagine that !, hell next you will be telling me that TRS-80's we had did not exist either.

      no you are the one revising history my good TROLL not me.

      R.Morton

      --
      modded quote "what's that he's talking about? Windows , Never had a problem with Windows till I tried to use it."
    22. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by R.Morton · · Score: 1

      maybe now, but not when I was in school.

      R.Morton

      --
      modded quote "what's that he's talking about? Windows , Never had a problem with Windows till I tried to use it."
    23. Re:It doesn't matter what the MPAA says by R.Morton · · Score: 1

      I see in fact you capitalize as badly as I do ;), that and the classes listed are the ones I can remember off the top of my head were a TV was used a lot.

      R.Morton

      --
      modded quote "what's that he's talking about? Windows , Never had a problem with Windows till I tried to use it."
  16. Empirical Test by drmofe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Experiment: Take a random sample of teachers. Equip half with camcorders, a DVD, DVD player and TV. (For completeness, include a group that can take a feed from the DVD player directly to the camcorder). Equip the other half with a PC, DVD ripping software, a DVD and DVD player.

    Measure the time taken to extract a clip from the specific DVD and the quality achieved by each group. Compare results.

    Hypothesis: Quality obtained by first group will be acceptable and is a lower-tech solution than that needed by second group

    1. Re:Empirical Test by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Teachers also have students in their classroom.

      "10 points extra credit to whoever helps me clip this section of this movie off this DVD."

      Can guarentee in any school where teachers are actually concerned about pulling clips off a DVD at least 5 students will know how to do that right then and there.

      Camcorder method requires setting up the camcorder, TV or projector, lighting, you'll likely need to do this in a spare room or after hours. Then you have to edit it in to whatever the teacher wanted to use it for.

      Acceptable or not, it's a large number of hoops for something that, if you're allowed to copy off the DVD, can otherwise be done in 10 minutes.

    2. Re:Empirical Test by DMalic · · Score: 1

      I had to re-read your hypothesis. It didn't sync up with the test you included. The camcorders being used to tape presentations in my classes fail pretty hard. They also look like they cost craploads of money; it's just that the resulting quality is bad. Ripping a DVD is SIGNIFICANTLY easier than messing with a camcorder setup.

    3. Re:Empirical Test by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to add in the extra MONETARY COST of owning and maintaining all the extra equipment necessary for doing things the mafiaa approved way. Our school disctrict alone might spend $10,000 annually to keep this obsolete equipment around, pointlessly. It costs just about $0.00 to just rip content on a ten year old computer.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Empirical Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      4th group: just play the dvd in class...not really that hard

    5. Re:Empirical Test by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The direct feed is unlikely to work...
      They usually use some kind of copy protection scheme from macrovision that exploits a bug in old VHS recorders... Although this bug has long since been fixed, VHS manufacturers have been forced to intentionally reintroduce it so their recorders cannot bypass the copy protection scheme.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:Empirical Test by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You will find that the terms of the DVD preclude playing it for large groups..
      Also you risk damage to the original media, and would make it harder for the students to reuse the media in their own projects if required.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Empirical Test by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 1

      You will find that the terms of the DVD preclude playing it for large groups..

      So what? Some text flashing by on a screen as you play the DVD is not a license.

    8. Re:Empirical Test by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the level of dickishness the **AAs will stoop to.

      That being said, the very first case they try against a teacher for showing a movie in class would pretty much destroy them. Especially if it's a beloved teacher.

    9. Re:Empirical Test by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 1

      I hope that the teacher's response would be something like this:

      By continuing this lawsuit, you agree to pay me triple the amount of damages that you receive in said lawsuit.

  17. Ridiculous, but somewhat scary. . . by MistaE · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was one of the few people that had the pleasure (or the displeasure) of being at the Library of Congress DMCA hearing room when the MPAA made this ridiculous argument. Suffice to say, I was completely shocked, flabbergasted, and just plain insulted that educators would truly be expected to do something like this in their bizarro world. Nevermind the fact that you would need an HDTV, HD Camcorder, Tripod, good lighting, and tons of time on your hands to manually create compilation clips with your camcorder (as if educators had any free time as it is).

    I couldn't tell if the Copyright bigwigs that heard the argument were actually taking it seriously, but I sincerely hope that any appearance of sincerity was simply there for the sake of keeping respect for the hearings.

    The one thing that I learned at the hearing was that you have to be fucking crazy in order to be a lawyer on their side. Even I (a soon to be unemployed law school graduate) didn't think that I could make this argument with a straight face even for tons of money.

    1. Re:Ridiculous, but somewhat scary. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even I (a soon to be unemployed law school graduate) didn't think that I could make this argument with a straight face even for tons of money.

      Don't worry, you'll learn.

    2. Re:Ridiculous, but somewhat scary. . . by GF678 · · Score: 1

      Even I (a soon to be unemployed law school graduate) didn't think that I could make this argument with a straight face even for tons of money.

      Some people are great lawyers for a reason - they can distance themselves from logic and common sense and still present a case, so long as the price is right. Having said that, I'm not I'd want to have anything to do with them on a personal basis, as I feel their humanity would have been sucked out by the profession.

    3. Re:Ridiculous, but somewhat scary. . . by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I don't really have sympathy, but I understand the mess they're being confronted with. If they admit that it should be legal to break DRM in cases of fair use, then the DRM-breaking tools themselves will have to be legal. Then suddenly they have no ground to control the distribution of DRM-breaking tools, which means everyone will have them, which means DRM will be completely useless.

      Now there's a good argument that those things should happen, but it's pretty clear that the MPAA doesn't want that to happen. Given that, of course they're going to argue that there's some other way for people to exercise fair use, no matter how ridiculous that argument is.

    4. Re:Ridiculous, but somewhat scary. . . by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Is not DRM totally useless right now? I can find anything I want via torrents all ready to use in an unprotected form, from movies to music to books and programs.

    5. Re:Ridiculous, but somewhat scary. . . by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      True. But the original person who removed the DRM is currently breaking laws to do so. Most of us believe that action should be legal and protected under fair use. This is a separate issue from whether or not the information itself should be free, even if that ideal loses out to the patent/copyright trolls this particular action should still be legal.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
  18. How much longer? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How much longer before the MPAA becomes irrelevant and we can just ignore their antics?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:How much longer? by mundanetechnomancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      actually, in spite of their best (or worst) efforts, most people already do

    2. Re:How much longer? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >How much longer before the MPAA becomes irrelevant and we can just ignore their antics?

      You can do that now. Simply refrain from consuming any product represented by their organization.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:How much longer? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I must see the new Star Trek movie. It is my prime directive to do so.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:How much longer? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How much longer before the MPAA becomes irrelevant and we can just ignore their antics?

      Under current law: ninety-five years after the end of the year in which the major U.S. motion picture studios stop publishing new works.

    5. Re:How much longer? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      According to Slashdot posters, it should happen in about... 5 years ago.

    6. Re:How much longer? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Considering that they haven't produced anything recently but remakes of old classics, we should see this before the century is out.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Videotapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Videotapes? What's that?

    1. Re:Videotapes by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Exactly. MPAA, you might want to finally join the rest of us in the 21st century. Don't be afraid, we're having lot's of fun!

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
  20. Teachers are tech idiots by docmur · · Score: 0

    I actually like this post, it makes a good point. Teachers are very on the bottom side of the Texh world. I had teachers in Elementary school that couldn't even use Windows. Come on, how hard is that. I think there should be a bare reqreset for teachers to be at least mid level skilled with tech.

    As for the stupid video laws, so what. Teachers should be allowed to show what ever they want to students. Infact students aren't shown enough in class rooms. In one case you go to a Catholic School and your told that every thing else is wrong and horrible to consider such as evolution, or you go to public school and you get a mis represented view on religon.

    Here's the solution. Teachers should be allowed to show what ever they want, but they have to be fair on what they show. I got a horrible over view of what Religon is, infact I was told every other Religon was wrong. Of course this is BS. I was also taught facts about tech that were clearly false, for instace I was told how to use a computer and they teachers couldn't even use Windows.

    Here's a new idea, lets get properly trained Teachers in the class room and make sure there fully trained in a proper overview in many areas, not what they think is proper overview. I think we seriously need to get better teachers. As for the DVD stuff, come on, Just use a tuner card, rip the video with some sort of Linux software, compress in the data etc... Do all the work required, Get the students to run the video or show it publicly, teach them how your doing it and then whats the harm.

    Teachers should be able to show what they want, they should have to use the proper technology to acheive it but non the less free viewing. They should also be trained to teach students better

    Thanks
    Docmur

    1. Re:Teachers are tech idiots by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Lol, I have instructors in college that can not transfer files from a computer to a flash drive, or figure out how to run a power point presentation.

    2. Re:Teachers are tech idiots by docmur · · Score: 0

      I had a Unix Teacher in my OS class who didn't know shit about working the shell, he claimed if I can run software on gcc 4.1.2 then it should run on gcc 3.4. He also kept telling the other student retarted ways on how to parce the enviroment varible and shit, stuff you'd have to do in like 1980 but not now, in either case I know almost 200x more then he did about Unix / Linux, which brings up another point, Teachers should be smarter / Guru's in what they teach, if a student knows more then why should there be a teacher ?

  21. I can't wait by Moleculo · · Score: 5, Funny

    until Star.Trek.(2009).Mr.BeRNaRD.3rdPeRIod.SoCiALSTudiES.avi hits the scene.

    1. Re:I can't wait by TapeCutter · · Score: 1
      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:I can't wait by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      what's up with the crazy caps lock?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    3. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As ridiculous as the above sounds, I have actually watched pirated movies in class for both educational and non-educational purposes. Having a communist teacher does have its advantages :)

    4. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, be sure to say hello to him. He has the right to choose his religion. I think he forgot about my right to free speech. Speaking of which, creationism (not a word) is religious, superstitious nonsense.

      Boo.

      contact chad at http://www.chadfarnan.com/ . Say hello at chadfarnan@yahoo.com (source: http://www.chadfarnan.com/)

    5. Re:I can't wait by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      $20 says the judge is a creationist.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:I can't wait by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      what's up with the crazy caps lock?

      Crazy mixed case, especially when it is every other character, is common in a large subculture of the data piracy scene. Another trait is alphanumeric substitution of letters and adoption of alternative spellings, especially in combination (1337 5p33k -- "leet" (as in "elite") speak).

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:I can't wait by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I've been part of entire bus trips of minors watching pirated R-rated (for violence) movies and playing penny-ante poker while crossing state lines. I wouldn't have been surprised if some of those in the back of the bus weren't also engaging in sex acts, be it vaginal, oral, anal, mutual masturbation, or flashing other vehicles.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  22. Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't they just as well play the DVD???

    1. Re:Wait, what? by J.Y.Kelly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can't they just as well play the DVD???

      I suggest you try playing a 20 second clip from the middle of a commercial DVD sometime to see how practical it is. Thanks to the inclusion of unskippable logos, trailers and informative films telling you how downloading music is stealing and makes you a criminal, it takes forever to actually get to the content. Whoever came up with the idea of locking DVD player controls should be made to try to start up Toy Story for an audience of 100 impatient toddlers and see how good an idea it seems then.

      We could insist that all educational DVD players don't implement these controls, but then that would break the DMCA and we're back to square one.

    2. Re:Wait, what? by Swampash · · Score: 1

      My policy is, every time I see a "DOWNLOADING IS STEALING" message, you know the sort of thing that comes on at maximum audio volume and that can't be skipped, on a DVD that I legitimately own, the movie industry owes me another movie. Displaying said message is regarded as agreement to these terms.

    3. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother? Just download the pirated version that has all that crap removed. Seriously people, the pirated version is better than the one we buy on the shelves. Ads removed, warnings removed, disabled buttons enabled, main title uncompressed from original, region restrictions removed etc.

    4. Re:Wait, what? by LainTouko · · Score: 2, Informative

      mplayer dvd://1 -ss 1090 -endpos 20

      Seems to work well enough.

    5. Re:Wait, what? by darthyoshiboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      mplayer dvd://1 -ss 1090 -endpos 20

      Seems to work well enough.

      Sorry LainTouko, still breaking the DMCA with that one so you might as well have an exception to the DMCA. (Much like they are trying to do.)
      Command line mplayer is probably beyond your average 7th period drama teacher as well.

    6. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! [slaps forehead] It's so obvious!

      Now, I'd like a short and entirely fair-use clip from these 8 DVDs. I'll make the class sit through the 8 unskippable FBI warnings about copyright, and the menu/scene selection, and my fast-forwarding to the right spot. It should take, oh, about 15 minutes to set up the 5 minutes I actually want. I'm sure the students can maintain their attention while I'm fiddling with the remote control and swapping disks for 2/3 of that time.

      The whole point is, it IS "fair use", but the use is such that the current packaging doesn't make the use practical without some kind of circumvention to extract those clips. The testimony at the hearings also demonstrated that sometimes quality matters a great deal (e.g., there was one set of clips dealing with computer graphics use in movies, and trying to spot the places where real CG was used versus a guy in a silver suit in the Terminator 2 movie).

      The MPAA in their testimony at the hearings specifically says that they approve of the uses that were presented by instructors as examples in the hearings. But they apparently think making teachers resort to antiquated, lower-quality, and inconvenient technology to camcord a movie (I don't even own a camcorder) is worth it rather than allowing an exception to circumvention of CSS for these fair uses. Why? Here's the real kicker: they claim that CSS is still a viable and "extremely effective" (direct quote!) copy-control technology. Really.

      The unaccepted submission I made for this story a couple of days ago included links to the hearings, audio transcripts for which are available. The MPAA's craziness, including their demo of camcording, begins at about 30 minutes through part 4 of the May 6th hearing [MP3 file]. The discussion of camcording starts at ~40 min. with the MPAA rep. Fritz Attaway, with the actual demo at ~45 minutes.

      According to this guy, the camcording demo shows "... taking shots off of a television monitor or a computer monitor can produce clips of movies easily, using equipment that is readily available and affordable and producing a result that is certainly comparable to the clips that we've seen here this morning and that have been offered as a reason circumvention is necessary."

      The whole testimony is worth listening to in order to understand the angle these guys are taking. It's going to be interesting when they get to the question/response part of the hearings.

    7. Re:Wait, what? by juletre · · Score: 1

      I remember installing DVD Genie on my computer many years ago. Besides letting me change my region settings as times as i wanted, it did the nice assumption of thinking non-skippable content was crap, and skipped it for you.

      --
      "he, who has quotes in his signature, is a douche" - unknown.
    8. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, can you do that for 12 disks in quick succession, please?

      I suppose I could buy a stack of DVD drives and put them in an external case.

    9. Re:Wait, what? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      This was my answer to that message when displayed in theaters.

      NKB.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  23. Yet more proof that the MPAA is just greedy asses by Werthless5 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is possibly the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. If anyone really needed proof that the MPAA doesn't care about consumers in any way, look no further.

  24. Leave the teachers out of what is already stupid by get_your_guns · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am more than willing to support smarter teachers in the classroom, including paying higher taxes for higher pay for these teachers. Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is?! Maybe if the MPAA had smarter teachers in the classroom when they were in school they would never try to pull fast ones like this to the Copyright office in the first place!

  25. I don't have a extensive understanding by Demonantis · · Score: 1

    I know that its legitimate in Russia to break copy protection to make a backup as allowed under their law. I don't think that is allowed in the states because it would be effectively attacking the DRM scheme. That makes it kinda silly then to have fair use and not allow people to use that right. Points to how poorly crafted the DMCA really is.

    1. Re:I don't have a extensive understanding by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You don't understand, the whole reason of the DMCA is to undermine the fair use clauses. Fair use is the loophole in the whole copyright system. Fair use means "you're allowed to copy (under certain circumstances), if you're able to copy. The DMCA added simply (concerning this): "you're not allowed to circumvent copy protection".

      Essentially, the DMCA removed your ability to copy without changing copyright laws in a way that would probably not have passed due to resistance.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:I don't have a extensive understanding by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You don't understand, the whole reason of the DMCA is to undermine the fair use clauses. Fair use is the loophole in the whole copyright system. Fair use means "you're allowed to copy (under certain circumstances), if you're able to copy. The DMCA added simply (concerning this): "you're not allowed to circumvent copy protection".

      If you're able to privately circumvent copy protection, no one need know, and it can continue quietly. The real meat of the DMCA is where it says you're not allowed to traffic in or receive tools that circumvent copy protection. Since the task of breaking copy protection is beyond the reach of most individuals, this effectively prevents even private breaking of copy protection by banning distribution of the necessary tools.

      The effectiveness of the copy protection then is determined by the ability of a single unaided individual to circumvent it. Unfortunately for the commercial copyright interests, the downloading of free tools is sufficiently on the down-low that they can't effectively halt their dissemination.

      Still, the copy-protection industry cannot permit the distribution of the tools. To prevent that, they have to demonstrate that fair-use copying can be performed by any other means. If open distribution of circumvention tools becomes permitted, then copying can occur outside of their ability to detect or prosecute. Any access to tools deemed fair use creates access to tools for infringing uses. It's a lynch pin of the law that the court will take any excuse not to weaken, even to the extent of torturing logic.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  26. The VHS... by Ridgecity · · Score: 1

    The movie industry's NEMESIS, is now their best friend.

  27. Let me get this straight... by CSMatt · · Score: 1

    The submitter just gave us a link to a recording of a recording?

  28. Even So by Data+Man+Version+Two · · Score: 1

    And that guy is using VLC, one of the best rip-a-DVD-as-you-play-it video players/transcoders

    --
    Process Terminated Normally
  29. Actually that would be an awesome consequence by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If only someone would propose a bill that would allow camcording in theaters for editorial use, pointing to the example the media companies gave as evidence for the necessity of the inclusion...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Actually that would be an awesome consequence by Thinboy00 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Given current lobbying trends? Not likely. They even have Obama in their collective pocket (yes, I know he's not the miracle the media thinks he is, but he was explicitly anti-lobbying during the debates.).

      --
      $ make available
  30. MPAA, RIAA.... by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    What do these folks have against education?
    First they go after the students, now, they go after the teachers?

    This brings up another point that someone further up mentioned as a joke, I've always thought that using a camcorder to record a movie would be and/or should be fair use, Its obviously an inferior copy (even the best shaky cams have some serious problems, mostly they point out just how $h!tty the theatre experience is, people get up, down, coughing, talking, etc); when it comes down to it I suspect the only way we will be rid of these folks is if we just stop buying movies and CD's which, I find somewhat ironic.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
    1. Re:MPAA, RIAA.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, copy a CD for a person and he'll have a copied CD.

      Show the person how to copy a CD and he'll have copies for the rest of his life.

      Any further questions why they are against education?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Or, better yet by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Teachers could carve each frame into a clay tablet and let it dry in the sun. Then mount the clay tablets on big wooden wheel and spin it real fast.

    Time to put an end to chucklehead organizations like the MPAA, BSA and RIAA. Companies are trying to be heavy-handed with their customers while letting some vaporous organization take the heat for their dickish behavior. Implement joint and several liability on the member companies for the actions of their enforcement organizations and this silly business will end overnight.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Or, better yet by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >Teachers could carve each frame into a clay tablet and let it dry in the sun. Then mount the
      >clay tablets on big wooden wheel and spin it real fast.

      Smart, resourceful teachers could persuade their educational institutions to produce their own, original education materials and create a profit center instead of incurring a cost.

      Explain to me how any product represented by the MPAA is in any way essential to K-12 education, aside from perhaps some course that covers entertainment film?

      Schools and school districts tend to be quite conspicuous and diligent when it comes to copyright law, as any band nerd should know. You didn't just photocopy music sheets. You probably leased them. Why would the same school treat motion picture media any differently?

      I hate to be the devil's advocate in this area, but I do need to separate concerns, the technical issues related to the storage media, versus compliance with the license granted by the content creator. The MPAA and the DMCA conflate these concerns, and I see that as the central issue.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Or, better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget though, a number of MPAA/RIAA lawyers are now in ridiculously high places of power. Their plans are only going in one direction from now on. Up.

  32. Another argument for downloading by fermion · · Score: 1
    The problem with most copyright arguments is that it tends to support downloading. If one is going to use the analog hole to break copyright, them one might as well download a copy from the internet. This accomplishing the same thing, that is make a fair use copy of the video without breaking the copy protection.

    Realistically, given the increasing free market bias of the developed world, combined with the relaxed view of copyright in the developing world, companies either have to supply content in a user friendly form, or have someone else do it. There is a great deal of money spent to build demand for these things. The problem is that there the value placed on he product by the producers is often much more than the value to the consumer, especially when the producers wishes to place arbitrary restrictions on use.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  33. At least four more years, obviously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    They own Biden, and their friends run the DoJ. See "change and hope".

  34. "ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like Pirate or Hacking or 'Assault' in Assault Weapon, also a media darling.
    The hard consonants of the word give it a ... 'jena se qua' quality.
    Similarly, note 'Poo' vs 'Shit' or 'Pussy' vs 'Cunt'.

    You can't tell me that the notoriety of Jack the Ripper isn't in some part due to his name.

    1. Re:"ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Funny

      'jena se qua'

      Who is that, a French porn star? The phrase you are looking for is je ne sais quoi.

    2. Re:"ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by The+Grand+Falloon · · Score: 1

      'jena se qua'

      Who is that, a French porn star?.

      Dibs!

    3. Re:"ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he actually means the French porn star.

    4. Re:"ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by srussia · · Score: 2, Funny

      .

      You can't tell me that the notoriety of Jack the Ripper isn't in some part due to his name.

      Agree. "Elvis the Ripper" just doesn't have the same ring to it.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    5. Re:"ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'jena se qua'

      Looks like Latin with bad grammar, something like: "Jena being herself".

    6. Re:"ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by avg_joe_01 · · Score: 1

      I laughed, I cried.. it was better than Cats. Thanks.

    7. Re:"ripping", the word is visceral, "copy" is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look everyone. Its the ever elusive _french_ grammar Nazi! Much more rare than her normal english cousins, she has never been seen outside of Fraco-territory.

  35. Ha by rpillala · · Score: 3, Funny

    If NEA is as powerful as many around here think it is, the recording industry is going down.

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    1. Re:Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the NEA was as powerful as people think around here then the "No Child Left Behind" act wouldnt exist. Or it would at least be crafted to do as the name implies compared to what it does.. Take money away from schools that arnt able to make the grade... great idea lets have the poor school districts that cant cut it with minimum funds from the gov try to improve the quality of the students education with even less money.

      Only time the NEA has any power is when politions actually care that the US education system has stalled out making it easier to get highly qualified employees anywhere but here

    2. Re:Ha by rpillala · · Score: 1

      NCLB is designed to simultaneously take money from public schools while increasing state and federal government involvement. Once this reaches a critical level, people will be much more receptive to ideas like, say, vouchers.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  36. Simpler solution by Dracil · · Score: 1

    The MPAA is required to furnish free DVDs to educators within a reasonable time frame (less than a week is good) on request.

  37. Scrap the whole thing, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the teachers should just get a license to use a copy of the DVD's script, which they may paraphrase and describe to the class aloud.

  38. Not any time soon by siloko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Haven't we been saying this for, like, ten years. The fact that an increasing number of consumers are becoming aware of said tactics doesn't seem to have:

    a) impacted on those tactics

    b) changed legislative backing for the MPAA

    c) reduced political complicity in the whole sorry affair

    Sure it will change eventually, but soon?

    1. Re:Not any time soon by srussia · · Score: 1

      Sure it will change eventually, but soon?

      Sooner or later, but it sure is fun watching a reductio ad absurdum playing out in real time.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    2. Re:Not any time soon by siloko · · Score: 1

      Sure it's fun to watch an reductio ad absurdum, but in real time?

    3. Re:Not any time soon by srussia · · Score: 1

      Sure it's fun to watch an reductio ad absurdum, but in real time?

      In real time as opposed to a thought experiment.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    4. Re:Not any time soon by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It has to affect enough people.

      Copying isn't possible? Ok, I don't copy. But a few people were pissed off, because they did copy.

      Putting DVD movies on my server is not possible? Ok, I have no server. But a few more people got pissed because they do and wanted to do that.

      Playing DVDs in computers is not possible? Ok, I don't play DVDs in computers. But a few more people got pissed, becaues they didn't have standalone DVD players.

      Copying that movie to my TV box where I record from TV isn't possible? Ok, I only record from TV. But again, a few more people...

      Recording from TV with my box is no longer possible? Ok, I don't record... but a few more...

      And on and on it goes. And every time a few more people are pissed off. The legal and technical blocks to use content are just now entering into mainstream, into the space where "ordinary" people start to notice it. How many "normal" people used the internet to get their movies 10 years ago? How many used computers to watch their movies? How many really wanted to copy DVDs?

      Now we're heading into the space where you'll soon see an impact on what's so easily called "the masses". TV set-top boxes are becoming more and more mainstream, and many are sold with the promise of time shifting. What will be the result when people find out that they're not allowed to time shift about 99% of the movies they want to watch?

      Time will tell. We're not yet at critical mass. But we're approaching it quickly.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Not any time soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will be the result when people find out that they're not allowed to time shift about 99% of the movies they want to watch?

      Absolutely nothing. E.g. in the US there is a two-party system locked in and both support this sort of crap if the MPAA asks for it.
      People will grumble a bit and put up with it.

  39. Re:Yet more proof that the MPAA is just greedy ass by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is possibly the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. If anyone really needed proof that the MPAA doesn't care about consumers in any way, look no further.

    If the MPAA didn't care about consumers then they wouldn't have given us Borat or Charlies Angels or Super Fly or Reefer Madness. Clearly, the MPAA just wants to protect the cultural IP of the United States from being exploited by criminals and teachers.

  40. I don't know if this relates... by earlymon · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you watch the History channels very, very early in the morning, you'll find that they run a show with less/no commercials to make room before the top of the hour. During that time, they have a History Classroom or something show (seriously - that's not my best time of day, so I apologize for inaccuracies).

    One thing I noticed - there's a screen that gives instructions to teachers that they have to delete any video recordings they've made of the show after a certain date - I recall, sleepily - that it's within a year or something.

    Now - how does history go stale in a year?

    I did a lot of digging to find the food chain on this one... History is the Classroom ties into Cable in the Classroom. Here's what they have to say:

    http://www.history.com/global/feedback/faq.jsp?NetwCode=THC&level_1=nodes_54224&level_2=nodes_54240&level_3=nodes_54297&x=35&y=11
    http://www.ciconline.org/faq#Copyright
    http://www.ciconline.org/copyright
    http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr280.shtml

    Now, color me naive - but that's the beginning of the foodchain for a teacher to BEGIN to simply videotape something related to history of educational value to show to their students. I quote - and I am not making this up:

    What's an educator to do? Read Education World's five-part series on copyright, fair use, and new technologies, that's what! We did the work so you wouldn't have to!
    http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr280a.shtml
    http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr280b.shtml
    http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr280c.shtml
    http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr280d.shtml
    http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr280e.shtml

    In an age where our test scores show we're failing, with teachers overburdened like never before - related to a show that a kid can just watch at home without encumbrances (should his/her parents **be there** for the kid with this kind of info) - note what the teacher has to go through.

    As opposed to just taping it and working it into the lesson plan - because it comes from a place called the History Channel - tied to Cable in the Classroom - where "cable" is that thing usually subsidized by local communities as a near utility.

    Thanks, copyright eagles. Thanks a lot.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  41. DeCSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's extremely amusing to see that they're using VLC to demonstrate their unreason.

  42. The Problem I See Here by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The problem I see here is that the Copyright Office may not see how absolutely stupid the MPAA's position on this actually is.

    Why would I suppose that? Well consider, the MPAA is actually making this lame argument, and they're not doing it to intentionally lose the argument, so they must think they have a chance of winning their case.

    This resolves to either:
    The MPAA is incredibly stupid and is insulting the Copyright Office (not a good idea if you're the MPAA).
    The Copyright Office really is this stupid.
    Both the MPAA and the Copyright Office are incredibly stupid.

    Heaven help us all!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  43. The MPAA is right by Legion303 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We can't have teachers ripping DVD-quality clips all willy-nilly. Why, if someone got ahold of enough teachers, he could put all their clips together and re-create the original movie! In digital DVD quality! You pirates will surely roast in hell for even considering it.

  44. extra costs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is pretty ridiculous, but the summary (I did not rtfa) contradicts itself a bit. Ripping a video incurs extra costs / time just as much as recording a video of a video does.

  45. Bad Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So their idea is to piss on teachers who have as many as some 100 children or so passing through their classes every day?
    I can imagine quite a few disgruntled teachers beginning anti-copyright lectures across the country.

  46. MPAA (Turd bats) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS it not time that people stopped fafing around and got together and once and for all time sorted the MPAA out on an Absolute basis or are you all so wet nappy scared of them that you will just continue to let them run amuck amongst you , they are only people only a FEW people at that there are millions of you there if you got together there aint a thing in the world they could do but capitulate completely
    but of course you are quite happy being told by some little SMUCK what you can and cant do they will be telling you how to hold it to have a pee next if you dont wake the **** up.

    non anon just fed up with slapshod slapshot mods that are just slapstick dicks

  47. What does that teach kids ? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1
    They see their teacher making a copy of a DVD: ''I need to do that because the MPAA says so''. The conclusion that kids will draw is that it is perfectly fine to make copies of DVD and that this is sanctioned by the MPAA.

    The only conclusion that I can draw is that the MPAA wants to protect its income stream by getting teachers to train up lots of adults who they can sue. Remember: the MPAA gets money from sueing, the studios loose money through piracy of DVDs.

    1. Re:What does that teach kids ? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So the message should be "making copies by filming it is OK"?

      Dunno, last time at the movies they said something very different.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  48. Uh-oh by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just finished ripping my somewhat meager DVD collection (~ 100 titles) to disk. Guess I should start over and use a camcorder this time around...

    On a more serious note - this really is getting absurd. Even with good care DVDs get scratched. I had to run a couple of mine through a Skip Doctor before they'd play without errors (as an aside: that's a pretty nifty device). But frankly the "backing up" aspect of all this is secondary - I'm ripping my DVDs because it's a heck of a lot more convenient to manage my library of purchased DVDs this way. Now I can take advantage of some great free software (pyTivo, streambaby) and watch whichever one I want using my Tivo remote - no more digging through the DVD rack looking for one particular movie.

    There's just no way I'm going to let these dinosaurs tell me what I can and can't do with my own stuff.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  49. Drug abuse in the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given recent stupid statements in press releases, attempts a litigation against the sick/dead, and involvement in criminal behaviour (illegal investigations, price fixing, ...), it seems like a good time for a drugs bust on this organisation. Clearly the people running it have a serious drug problem, or if not, are seriously sociopathic.

  50. Friends wonder... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    why I don't go and see Star Trek this weekend even though I'm a trekkie.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:Friends wonder... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Waiting for the screener? :)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  51. ripping dvd is a waste of time for teachers by bigdrf · · Score: 0

    Ripping dvd's for class is a waste of time. All that ripping and encoding. Teachers have to prep for classes after school is over, and they are on their own unpaid time. It's much easier for teachers to find the clips they want on YouTube, since it's likely that their students have already posted the clip... at least until google starts charging for it.

  52. Reduced Quality Technique by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Just re-record it at a 2x higher compression rate, then you have a "lesser quality sample" that falls under 'fair use'.

    Oh, and that should cover my copy too.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. Borrowing from the Cassette Tax Example by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    The items change but the names remain the same:

    A representative of Sony Pictures wants us to use a Sony camcorder to film a piece of their movie on a Sony memory stick or tape, and transfer it to a blank Sony DVD using a Sony laptop for playback later through a Sony monitor or projector. Of course the reason is that they want the artists to get the money due them.

    Of course the MPAA doesn't just represent Sony. All the players have or invest in companies that produce the recording and playback hardware and media.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  54. If you think that's weird -- MPAA movie server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They (the MPAA) are also working on an online movie server ("USC Film Server" project) where teachers can select portions of movies in order to obtain clips of them for a special player program, and automatically submit a request to the relevant copyright holder for permission. They're getting it ready and hope to "beta test" it "later in the year" for Warner Bros. movies.

    You can hear it at about 1 hour, 4 minutes into part 4 [MP3] of the May 6 hearings.

  55. fiIt's a stupid argument in every way by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Not only is educational use explicitly protected, but that's a slippery slope. Where do you stop? If I'm downloading a cam of your film, can I claim that it's obviously only for review purposes since it's low-quality?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Overreaction? Yes. But it is a reaction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I know. The various *IAA's of the world have been over the top for a long time now.
    But, I can't say that I blame them 100%. Performers & content creators are entitled to be paid for their work. Just as you or I am.

    But, illegally copying (stealing) their materials has been going on for a long time now. They are overreacting. But they are reacting to a legitimate problem.

    Granted, they could do a better job creating content that people want to pay for. Myself, I haven't purchased a newly recorded CD in over 2 decades. But it's not because I steal what I want. There just haven't been any CD released in the past 15-20 years that I consider to BE music. If you aim your product at a bunch of snotnoses living in their parent's basements who can't afford to purchase your product, that's your fault.

    But I can see their point too. How would you like to go to work, and then find that you don't get paid because someone stole the fruits of your work? You might overreact too.

  57. Works for me! by mmell · · Score: 3, Funny
    I downloaded a copy of Star Wars, Episode III several years ago - I'm pretty sure it was made by this method.

    Okay, I'm pretty sure a movie theater screen was involved, rather than a television set, but the basic mechanism is essentially the same.

    I was only pursuing an education, honest! It's not fair - Obi-Wan trained Anakin Skywalker, but he wouldn't train me. I have to get my force training somewhere, don't I?

  58. It's an acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Viruses, Infections, Spyware, Trojans, Adware

    1. Re:It's an acronym by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Viruses, Infections, Spyware, Trojans, Adware

      Brought to you by the Really Inane Assholes of America, as aided by the Marginally Productive Assholes of America.

      --
      $ make available
  59. Re:Yet more proof that the MPAA is just greedy ass by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The MPAA doesn't care about consumers. That's also not their mission statement. Their job is to care about movie makers. Essentially, the consumer is the necessary evil to get money to their protectees. If they could force you (or anyone, for that matter) to hand money to their members, it would probably be all right with them.

    Sorry, but the argument is like saying "Unions don't care for employers". No they don't. It's the necessary evil they have to deal with.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  60. Movie studios own all TV news by tepples · · Score: 1

    Simply refrain from consuming any product represented by their organization.

    It's hard to avoid the MPAA without going back to Amish country. For example, movie studios in the MPAA own all major commercial television news outlets in the United States, whether left or right:

    • National Amusements owns CBS News and Paramount.
    • Disney owns ABC News and Walt Disney Pictures.
    • General Electric owns NBC News, MSNBC, Universal Studios, and a major brand of light bulbs.
    • News Corporation owns Fox News and Twentieth Century Fox.
    • Time Warner owns CNN, HLN, Warner Bros. Pictures, New Line, and the monopoly high-speed ISP in areas with Road Runner and no DSL.

    Sony doesn't own any news outlets, but it does own Sony Pictures and make the only video game console that can officially dual-boot into GNU/Linux.

  61. Easy Solution... by Phil_at_EvilNET · · Score: 1

    Give educational institutions the right to record any DVD with the provision that the DVD burner places a watermark in the lower right hand corner that states the institution name (Like IU or PennState, etc) and "For Educational Use ONLY".

    There's a lot more rational way of making things happen. It's just that the MPAA and RIAA are more worried about the profits than they are about the "copyrights". Any MPAA or RIAA lawyer that tells you otherwise is full of crap.

    --
    To avoid corruption, one must remain dishonest.
  62. Other ways by fremean · · Score: 1

    Surely there's less convoluted ways then a camcorder - say... Hooking up a vcr to the A/V jacks... or hell, an analog tv tuner with composite in...

  63. Whatever happened to the FECAl act? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Family Entertainment & Copyright Act, passed in 2005 mostly at the MPAA's behest, established a penalty of up to six years for using a camcorder in a movie theater.

    Oh, the irony.

  64. The MPAA Calls This the "Analog Hole" by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

    Did they mention to the hearing that they're doing their damndest to close the analog hole? Did they give a plan for what teachers could do when they manage to do that?

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  65. Analog Hole protection:: was: Re:Empirical Test by metaforest · · Score: 1

    The bug in VHS was never really fixed. The issue is due to the way that VHS(and Beta) systems had to record video.

    Analog video recorders match the tape movement and the rotation speed of the flying heads dynamically, such that the mechanical system is held in synchronization with the incoming video signal.

    The synchronization during recording is very brittle because it has nothing to reference internally, except the regularity, and conformance of the incoming video signal to the broadcast standard. Additionally the mechanical nature of the recording servo loops is that they do not respond well to sudden changes in the timing of the synchronization information in a video signal.

    Macrovision and and similar systems produce video that "wiggles" the horizontal and vertical sync pulses in the time domain such that the VHS recording servos cannot stay locked, thus causing "tearing" of the magnetic signal written to the tape.

    The only real "fix" for this is to buffer up a significant portion of the incoming video frame and analyze the sync information to get feed-forward correction to the servos. The ability to do this would add a LOT of cost to a VHS recorder. I don't know for sure, but I doubt record buffering was ever available in mass-market units.

    As a side note rental VHS tapes could be "copy protected" using a similar technique. A modified recorder was used that introduced a similar "wiggle" into the recording servos during write. The key difference here is that the source video signal did not have this "wiggle", so the servos remain locked to the source, and the servos were of a much higher quality than the ones found in mass-market VHS recorders allowing them to keep the mechanical elements of the record loop under tighter control.

    I should also point out there were boxes sold (often as kits) that would buffer a line or two of the video signal in an analog delay line, and average the "wiggle" out of the sync. The filtering wasn't perfect and the delay-line buffering introduced some noise to the resulting video, but they did work. At the time multi-line analog delay lines were hideously expensive, so these boxes were often used by commercial pirates to create counterfeit rental tapes from either mass-market sources, or early release rental sources.

    1. Re:Analog Hole protection:: was: Re:Empirical Test by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The bug in VHS was never really fixed. The issue is due to the way that VHS(and Beta) systems had to record video.

      Analog video recorders match the tape movement and the rotation speed of the flying heads dynamically, such that the mechanical system is held in synchronization with the incoming video signal.

      VCRs will suffer the effects of Macrovision signals passed through them without their engaging in any recording, preventing one from passing a DVD player's signal through a VCR just because one doesn't have enough inputs available on a TV. In this, VCRs are made to be more vulnerable to a copy protection scheme than they would be naturally.

      However, the manufacturers of consumer digital transcoders and digital recorders have been mandated to detect the analog Macrovision protection and refuse to operate even though their hardware would otherwise be immune to this method of copy protection (though some have a hidden mode enabled at power-up to disable this detection).

      I think though this is enforced through contract law in order to be permitted to encode video under certain codecs such as MPEG and DV and not by any law passed by Congress. It's likely in the standard specification for VHS technology as well.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  66. Re:Yet more proof that the MPAA is just greedy ass by metaforest · · Score: 1

    The MPAA doesn't care about consumers. That's also not their mission statement. Their job is to care about movie makers. Essentially, the consumer is the necessary evil to get money to their protectees. If they could force you (or anyone, for that matter) to hand money to their members, it would probably be all right with them.

    Sorry, but the argument is like saying "Unions don't care for employers". No they don't. It's the necessary evil they have to deal with.

    At a certain threshold, unions don't care about their rank & file constituency either. What's best for the employee becomes secondary to what's best for the union leadership. I see it as an inherent conflict of interest.

    When a support/service organization reaches a critical mass it typically begins behaving like a living organism. Unions and similar organizations like the *AA start out behaving like... Pilot fish: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_fish ...and end up behaving like lamprey: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamprey

  67. Obligatory meme by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

    We can't have teachers ripping DVD-quality clips all willy-nilly. Why, if someone got ahold of enough teachers, he could put all their clips together and re-create the original movie! In digital DVD quality! You pirates will surely roast in hell for even considering it.

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of DVD-ripping teachers!

    --
    I lost my sig.
  68. And the MPAA wants to extend the law.... by Rizzen · · Score: 1

    So, how much longer until they make it illegal to even make a short clip with their overly contrived method?

  69. I wonder... by spacenut20 · · Score: 1

    If the number of movies downloaded from the internet spikes when stories of the MPAA suggesting idiotic crap like this comes out.

    Hmmmmmmm...

  70. High Tech Solution by hanekhw · · Score: 1

    Let's bring the Ekto-Sketch for Teachers. Once they're finished just shake well.

  71. Re:Yet more proof that the MPAA is just greedy ass by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    If the MPAA didn't care about consumers then they wouldn't have given us... Reefer Madness.

    It's pretty clear from the History section of the linked Wikipedia page that the MPAA did not bring us that movie. I wouldn't even lay the blame on the Motion Pictures Producers and Distributors Association (MPPDA), its precursor.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  72. Re:Yet more proof that the MPAA is just greedy ass by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

    It's pretty clear from the History section of the linked Wikipedia page that the MPAA did not bring us that movie.

    Yeah I know, the Christians are to blame. I was hoping you guys would give me a little bit of rhetorical license here.