Slashdot Mirror


Carnivorous Clock Eats Bugs

Designers James Auger and Jimmy Loizeau have created a clock that is powered by "eating" bugs. The clock traps insects on flypaper stretched across a roller system and then drops them into a vat of bacteria. The insects are then "digested" and the ensuing chemical reaction is transformed into power that keeps the rollers moving and the LCD clock working. The two offer another version that is powered by mice and an even cooler machine that picks insect fuel from spiderwebs with the help of a robotic arm and a video camera.

151 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. Bugs? by bluesatin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I won't be buying a first generation one of these, it's bound to have a tonne of bugs.

    1. Re:Bugs? by SSgt.+Lagface · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I won't be buying a first generation one of these, it's bound to have a tonne of bugs.

      Hopefully later generations will have more. My question is, how many bugs will it take to run that thing? I don't know how much power you'd get per bug, but I wouldn't be surprised if it really needed a ton of bugs to keep that thing up for a while.

    2. Re:Bugs? by Serenissima · · Score: 1

      I know it's a joke, but isn't there really an actual glitch? How consistently can you "drop" something off of flypaper? Isn't the point of flypaper to trap the insects so that they DON'T easily come off?

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Bugs? by Brandee07 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It has a scraper to scrape the bugs off of the paper and into the bug-digesting compartment. I guess that would be the stomach?

    4. Re:Bugs? by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 2, Informative

      The bugs are removed with a scraper. Here is a pic.

    5. Re:Bugs? by hargrand · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not only that, if this catches on, it'll just be a matter of time before we start running out of bugs in the US and have to start relying on foriegn sources of bugs.

    6. Re:Bugs? by Mursk · · Score: 1

      You can probably remove the bugs pretty easily if you're willing to part with the legs. Probably not much power to be drawn from those, anyway...

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    7. Re:Bugs? by DeafZombie · · Score: 1

      Yes... but a scrapper that scrapes bugs off the flypaper would also scrape the glue off the fly paper, rendering it pretty useless, right?

      --
      The Binary Anti-Pattern [http://beyondboolean.blogspot.com/]
    8. Re:Bugs? by Retric · · Score: 1

      The LCD clock could probably run for a few months per housefly. It's mostly a question of digestion effecency, and other losses.

    9. Re:Bugs? by ElectricRook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oil on plastic works as fly-paper. Once the fly touches the oil, it cannot fly. It starts to squirm until a wing touches, then it ain't going anywhere. Soapy water works too.

      A neighbor attached a 10 inch glass disk to an old style computer box fan, and it turned about 15 RPM. He positioned the disk so that it dipped into a half plastic milk carton of vegetable oil. A lamp was positioned to shine on the glass. On the first night, the tank was completely full of bugs (mostly moths), and it looked like mud.

      What I want to know, is the details of the digester, what is the reaction that produces electricity. How do I make that part?

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    10. Re:Bugs? by batrick · · Score: 1

      Ya but it's also self-correcting!

    11. Re:Bugs? by sgbett · · Score: 1

      I had one, there was a problem with sound, it kept going Tic-Tock.

      --
      Invaders must die
    12. Re:Bugs? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    13. Re:Bugs? by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

      We haven't figured that part out yet.

      But we do know it was us that scorched the sky or something to that effect.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    14. Re:Bugs? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I can see how the clock swallows, but more importantly, where does it poop?

    15. Re:Bugs? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes... but a scraper that scrapes bugs off the flypaper would also scrape the glue off the fly paper, rendering it pretty useless, right?

      That's why your scraper uses an edge made of pure anti-protons. Absolutely pure!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    16. Re:Bugs? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Also, won't the acid be 'used up'? So you're fueling it not only with the bugs, but with the acid you have to keep refilling?

    17. Re:Bugs? by Newander · · Score: 1

      I imagine it's more scraping than dropping.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    18. Re:Bugs? by dmmiller2k · · Score: 1

      One question: does it need to be primed, like a pump, with a handful of starter bugs to get it going?

      --

      "No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up." -- Lily Tomlin

  2. have an order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could i please have house alarm from same company please?

  3. Cool For now. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Until people start hacking these and needs more power. Then starts going for human flesh.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Cool For now. by pr100 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new clock overlords.

    2. Re:Cool For now. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I had to OC my clock, so I added a butterfly trap to get extra energy."

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Cool For now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      FEED ME SEYMOUR!

    4. Re:Cool For now. by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Soylent Clock runs on people!

    5. Re:Cool For now. by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's closer than you think. Just consider the disturbingly named 'EATR': http://www.robotictechnologyinc.com/index.php/EATR Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot. Strikes me that this 'tactical' robot is one programming glitch away from Robocalypse Now.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:Cool For now. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      We prefer to be called "Time Lords", and keep your grubby hands off my Tardis!

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Cool For now. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Funny

      "At the tone, the time will be 11:13am. BEEP."

      "At the sound of your blood curdling screams and unheralded pleas for mercy, the time will be 11:14am."

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    8. Re:Cool For now. by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      "time-keeping carnivorous robot overlords" is even better. More menace.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    9. Re:Cool For now. by tenco · · Score: 1

      soylent clock eats people.

    10. Re:Cool For now. by treeves · · Score: 1

      If you wanted to say it like the movie, you'd just say "Soylent Clock IS people." (of course with the anguished Charlton Heston voice)

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    11. Re:Cool For now. by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      What makes you think he was talking to you, you alien?

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    12. Re:Cool For now. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          For some reason, many people talk to me about many things. When I try to pretend that they are not talking to me, it usually turns out they are, and are offended by this.

          It's rather unnerving at times, but I suspect will some day make for a long running show on something that will be called a "television". You'll understand more when the time comes.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  4. It's one small step from a bug... by nasor · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to your laser-blasted skeleton.

  5. Prayer for Vista? by mordors9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any chance of Microsoft getting a version that would eat the bugs in VIsta? okay someone was going to say it...

    1. Re:Prayer for Vista? by ExploHD · · Score: 1

      You don't want to OVERfeed it!

  6. Re:umm...why??? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    The power generated might be enough to run one headlight. But what would really be interesting is capturing some of the speed energy to help charge the battery. But with using wind.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  7. Applications by koreaman · · Score: 1

    Does this have any practical applications, or is it just neat?

    1. Re:Applications by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think the practical application is that it gets rid of bugs and it tells the time.

    2. Re:Applications by eln · · Score: 1

      You know all those flies that are always buzzing around you, landing briefly on your Cheeto-stained fingers? Now they can help you tell time!

    3. Re:Applications by vertinox · · Score: 1

      The piratical application involves man sized recepticals and a sign that "Get off my lawn! Trespassers will used to tell time!"

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    4. Re:Applications by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

      The piratical application involves man sized recepticals and a sign that "Get off my lawn! Trespassers will used to tell time!"

      No, the piratical application involves ship-sized receptacles, cutlasses, and ropes to fetch fuel.

    5. Re:Applications by MBCook · · Score: 1

      It got posted to Slashdot.

      Q.E.D.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:Applications by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      I think the practical application IS that it is neat!!!

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    7. Re:Applications by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      it pisses off PETA no end, which is a practical application, even if they're right this time (subjecting defencesless insects to a horrible death for the hell of it is just twisted)

      --
      FGD 135
  8. One step closer to the Matrix? by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

    One step closer to The matrix?

    or perhaps spawning ideas for Skynet?

    1. Re:One step closer to the Matrix? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      More like Star Trek's planet-eating Doomsday Machine.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  9. Oh sure... by kevinNCSU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh sure, everyone's in favor of bug powered clocks, but as soon as you put a pedestrian catcher on the front of your electric SUV to make city driving more efficient then OHHhhh, suddenly you've gone too far!

    1. Re:Oh sure... by 2obvious4u · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I so wanted to spend a mod point on this, since I have them to give away....

      However, you joke of pedestrians, what about a more "realistic" road kill or still funny but more likely to be "true" cat and dog catcher?

    2. Re:Oh sure... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, everyone's in favor of bug powered clocks, but as soon as you put a pedestrian catcher on the front of your electric SUV to make city driving more efficient then OHHhhh, suddenly you've gone too far!

      Yeah, the people making Soylent Green were bitching that pedestrian catchers cut into their resources.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:Oh sure... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Cow catchers have been accepted by our civilization for a long time, so just put a cow catcher on the front of your electric SUV.

    4. Re:Oh sure... by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means. Cow catchers act like plows to knock the cow out of the way of the train. Granted, you could redesign them to capture cows and consume them for energy, but I'm guessing the power density of a cow isn't going to be enough for it to matter. Besides, do you know how much a cow costs?

    5. Re:Oh sure... by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Just turn the cow catcher so that it scoops the cow into the boiler instead of pushing it away.

  10. From 'fly net' to skynet. by Borg453b · · Score: 1

    Favourite part: "This is so wrong it has to be right."

    Original - or did he cite someone?

    --

    - Mad, ingenous - they've both left you puzzled -
  11. Obligatory by Willtor · · Score: 1

    Nom nom nom.

    --
    "The knee is the elbow of the leg." -- My wife
  12. Hmmm by DaMattster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd love to take one of these to Alaska in the spring into the early summertime. With the number of mosquitoes living there, I'll bet enough current could be generated to do something more than just power a clock. Mosquitoes in Alaska have been known to be so voracious as to kill a moose that happens upon a swarm. Imagine what millions of these pests could do with this system - bake a chicken or turkey or even provide enough electricity to power a small cabin.

    1. Re:Hmmm by DeafZombie · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... interesting, maybe if it generated enough current it could actually travel through time instead of just telling time? Brilliant!

      --
      The Binary Anti-Pattern [http://beyondboolean.blogspot.com/]
    2. Re:Hmmm by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      You're not looking at the big picture. True efficiency should aim to keep entropy to a minimum and thus delay the heat death of the universe. We would be better served if the mosquitoes weren't hatched in the first place.

      Couple your idea with the satellite microwave power ray and we're onto something.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    3. Re:Hmmm by Xoltri · · Score: 1

      Mosquitoes in Alaska have been known to be so voracious as to kill a moose that happens upon a swarm.

      Citation needed.

      --
      -Xoltri
    4. Re:Hmmm by harpune · · Score: 1

      Too many mosquitos, and it will develop a taste for human blood.

      --
      Shriver

      And a thousand thousand slimy things
      Lived on; and so did I.
  13. Even better would be a carmine clock by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Which eats red beetles and uses the red from the crushed shells to color itself carmine red, whilst engorging itself on mosquitoes.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  14. Ethical Treatment of Flies by ChienAndalu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nice to see that PETA is already all over this.

    These bloodthirsty, gut-wrenching robots, designed by UK-based designers James Auger and Jimmy Loizeau thrive on killing and liquidizing flies and mice, whilst serving the purpose of⦠well, not much at all really.

    They even have their own vision of insect disposal.

    I wonder if they target antibacterial soap and penicillin next...

    1. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

      Damn it first link should be this one.

    2. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by ChienAndalu · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Funny

      The universe is hostile, so impersonal; devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been.

      The more PETA irritates me, the more I want to hang dead animals by their necks outside their headquarters at night. And I'm starting to feel encouraged to hang not-quite-dead things that are still wriggling... I used to really like animals....

    4. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm of the general opinion that if you manage to piss off PETA, you know you're doing something right.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Bacteria? They're not even eukaryotes!

    6. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by koreaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I personally think Maddox's ideas for stopping Peta are the way forward. http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=sponsor

    7. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thanks for the site to troll.

    8. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm betting the ones at the top who have drunk the most kool-aid would almost certainly choose to lose a limb.

      Too lazy to find a link, but the president of PETA has stated that she would be opposed even to research that was guaranteed with 100% certainty to cure AIDS or cancer (I forget which) if even one animal was used for the research.

    9. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm for feeding swarmy bastards like that to the robots. Follow it up with the ALF idiots, then the PETA leadership. Should be enough cross memberships to take out Sea Shepherds as well. We recycle enough of these ecoterrorists & ecoidiots, maybe we can actually get things done.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    10. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by hazah · · Score: 1

      What's even more ironic is that same president, or someone very close to her (I too am too lazy to find the link) uses penicillin because even though it's an animal byproduct, it allows her to survive to further the PETA cause, making the sacrifice an "OK" one... somehow.

      Bunch of hypocrites... giving the rest of us hippies a bad name.

    11. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the Ronald McDonald House is like just down the street. The PETA people have a tendancy to take it out on the kids. Really classy of them, I might add.

    12. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I'm all for being nice to animals, and I don't normally have any beef with PETA. But that reaction is just stupid. The only way to improve a fly, mosquito or cockroach is to make it dead. The machine only extracts energy from the breakdown of insect organic material.

      Seems to me this might be a good alternative to sticking dead people in the ground in expensive plastic-lined wooden boxes so they don't even compost properly.

    13. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Nyckname · · Score: 1

      Flies exist as food. They're feeding the clock. I think I'll call mine "Renfield".

    14. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Alrescha · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "The universe is hostile, so impersonal; devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been."

      There is a moral difference between "devour to survive" and "killing living things to power your clock".

      disclaimer: I have no connection, nor do I wish to have any connection, with PETA or any of its members.

      A.
      (who chases flies out the window, where they can meet their demise in some spider's web)

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    15. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by DeafZombie · · Score: 1

      Well then I hope she gets AIDS... or Cancer... oh well, both.
      Or better yet, I hope she swims in the Amazon and get a Candiru! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candiru)

      --
      The Binary Anti-Pattern [http://beyondboolean.blogspot.com/]
    16. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by ari_j · · Score: 1

      You forget the nature of powerful hypocrites: The second that she is diagnosed with AIDS or cancer, whichever one it is, she'll stop worrying about ethical treatment of animals and worry a lot more about ethical treatment of herself. It's simple human nature. We are the only species that is capable of having a message, and therefore the only species capable of being hypocritical whenever our message runs counter to our own selfish needs.

    17. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by koreaman · · Score: 1

      If you don't value the life of bugs and flies, you do in fact either have a beef with PETA, or misunderstand PETA's position.

    18. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by zoips · · Score: 1

      So, what, bacteria don't deserve to survive? We should just let the bacteria in the clock's fuel cell die because someone doesn't like the idea of it surviving?

    19. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      https://www.petacatalog.org/prodinfo.asp?number=HP200

      WTF? Why on earth would you let a mouse go outside? They will just go right back inside and continue to do major damage to your house.

    20. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "So, what, bacteria don't deserve to survive?"

      You are referring to the bacteria that we put into the clock?

      Two wrongs don't make a right.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    21. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm of the general opinion that if you manage to piss off PETA, you know you're doing something right.

      Well...I'm of the general opinion that if PETA manages to piss you off then you are uncomfortable with nuance and ambiguity - not because PETA, itself, embraces nuance and ambiguity but because deep down you realize that your rigid beliefs are just as difficult to defend as PETA's rigid beliefs.

      PETA believes that animals should be treated better and apparently, in some sense, you disagree. The thing is, there almost certainly is not a "should". That is, it is overwhelmingly unlikely that life has a purpose - at least in an absolute fundamental sense. Sure, we've evolved certain feelings - certain desires - and we act on those feelings (often after have made complex predictions about how our actions are likely to affect our feelings). But there is no inherent law of nature that we "should" feel good - or that we "should" not feel bad.

      One of the most profound insights into the nature of human existence was the Milgram Experiment. Basically, most people don't have an internal moral compass: they don't have any inherent aversion to inflicting pain, suffering, and death on others. This explains why Hitler had such broad support in Germany, why the USA (the greatest democracy in the world) had slavery, and pretty much why there is so much suffering in the world generally.

      The fact that there is no absolute morality (no "purpose" to life) and furthermore that most people do not individually have a fundamental moral compass either is deeply unsettling. Given that an organization like PETA confronts you with these facts, it's not unsurprising that you dislike PETA (killing the messenger, so to speak).

      But, ultimately, your discomfort with PETA says more about you - and your insecurity regarding your personal (rigid) world view - than it does about PETA.

    22. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      There is a moral difference between "devour to survive" and "killing living things to power your clock".

      How else am I going to know when it's dinner time?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    23. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > if you manage to piss off PETA, you know you're doing something right.

      If you can manage to get PETA, Greanpeace, NOW, and Dan Bernstein all mad at you for the same thing, then you've really gone and done something.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    24. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Bugs42 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ok, normally I don't feed the trolls but I've got nothing better to do while my code compiles:

      One of the most profound insights into the nature of human existence was the Milgram Experiment [wikipedia.org]. Basically, most people don't have an internal moral compass: they don't have any inherent aversion to inflicting pain, suffering, and death on others.

      Wrong. Even though the participants in the Milgram experiment complied, they all raised questions about it. Clearly they recognized it as wrong - the findings only say that we, as a species, will submit to authority, NOT that we lack a moral compass.

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    25. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I think it was that she's diabetic, and uses insulin, which was tested on animals.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    26. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It isn't so much that I enjoy inflicting suffering on animals ... it's more that I think PETA are a bunch of total fucking nutjobs who wilfully spread misinformation and engage in various truly obnoxious forms of activism.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    27. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by hazah · · Score: 1

      That's the one! I should have had more coffee.

    28. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by Atario · · Score: 1

      I bet setting fire to dogs and cats would piss them right off. Is that "doing something right"?

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    29. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Quite a poignant quote, really, even if unintentional. The song is about the lack of empathy regarding the suffering of others, as long as there's a spectacle involved. Car bombs, animal cruelty, whatever.

      You killed it with your next sentence, though. Personally, I don't want to harm others just because it would infuriate someone I disagree with. That's what the Taliban are all about with their kidnappings and terrist campaigns.

      Probably going to be modded down for being a "Pseudo-intellectual, Philosophy-101, know-it-all, holier-than-thou, I-understand-the-suffering Tool fan, but hey; If the shoe fits... I like Tool, their messages, and their imagery. It's vivid, insightful, and poignant, even if a little "Here, let me spoon feed you some morality."

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    30. Re:Ethical Treatment of Flies by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's like they say, religion is good but church is bad, organized religion pushes people further from their God, etc. PETA is like that; the sheer volume of stupidity from groups like PETA or people like Fred Phelps makes me want to beat them, or at least horrify them until they can no longer process the concept of going outside. PETA has decent intentions, Phelps is just a raving asshole, they both fall into the same pile of shit.

  15. Wow. by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 5, Informative

    Talk about a nested series of links. I had to go through 3 separate sites- Slashdot, Endgadget, and Hack-a-Day, one linked to the other, until I got to the original New Scientist gallery photos which had many more interesting robot pictures. Oh, and the end link wasn't to page 1 of the photo gallery and the links weren't obvious each time either. For those who don't want to go the long way around, here is the original link.

    1. Re:Wow. by unifyingtheory · · Score: 1

      So how does it start working if it gets all its power from flies and needs power to capture flies? If it has a power cord to plug it in or a battery, then that pretty much defeats the whole purpose of the "robot" to begin with.

      I noticed in the gallery that the lamp had a power cord. If I were going to buy a powered device to kill bugs it would definitely be a conventional "bug zapper" -- a more entertaining option.

    2. Re:Wow. by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      Know what is even funnier? I saw this one Friday afternoon. On a political humor blog no less; and the punch line is Frank J. pointed the link at newscientist directly. Here on News for Nerds we get the blog pointing to blog version days later.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:Wow. by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      So how does it start working if it gets all its power from flies and needs power to capture flies? If it has a power cord to plug it in or a battery, then that pretty much defeats the whole purpose of the "robot" to begin with.

      I don't know. How did you start eating food if you need to eat in order to gain energy to obtain food? If you have to be plugged in, it pretty much defeats the purpose of being alive to begin with.

      Right?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:Wow. by mathi · · Score: 1

      It is the only effective way to save their server from being slashdotted, nobody else is going to RTFA.

  16. How about linking to the actual source by weave · · Score: 5, Informative

    Instead of linking to a blog that talks about another blog that refers to and links to the original story, why not just link to the original source to save us from 5 click throughs and give the original authors credit as well?

    Original story: Domestic robots with a taste for flesh

    1. Re:How about linking to the actual source by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Funny
      Instead of linking to a blog that talks about another blog that refers to and links to the original story, why not just link to the original source to save us from 5 click throughs and give the original authors credit as well?

      Because slashdot is a website that is powered by these clicks. Each time you click on a hyperlink your mouse generates 1 joule of energy that gets faxed to the slashdot server farm using the technology patented by Dilbert.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:How about linking to the actual source by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Instead of linking to a blog that talks about another blog that refers to and links to the original story, why not just link to the original source to save us from 5 click throughs and give the original authors credit as well?

      Maybe because the submitter needs more hits on his blog? Just a thought....

    3. Re:How about linking to the actual source by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      Thx for the link. Too bad the video is powered by "The video you are trying to watch is currently unavailable" brightcove.com flash player of doom... Never had that piece of shit display a single video on firefox, nor give any adequate error message...

  17. Prior art by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Druuge ships, Star Control II.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Prior art by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Druuge ships, Star Control II.

      You know, I always thought it was pretty weird how your crew would be mad at you if you sold a bunch of them to the Druuge, but they never seemed to care when dozens of them would die because I was too drunk to avoid smacking the ship into a planet.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Prior art by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      You know, I always thought it was pretty weird how your crew would be mad at you if you sold a bunch of them to the Druuge, but they never seemed to care when dozens of them would die because I was too drunk to avoid smacking the ship into a planet.

      Because it's all part of the plan. If the crew dies because I smack into a planet or pick a fight with a bigger ship, nobody panics, because it's all part of the plan. But when I say I'm going to sell a few crew to the Druuge because I need some credits, well then everyone loses their minds!

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  18. Thinking more on this- by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

    it occurs to me that there is a minor flaw in powering a robot clock on household pests- namely that the goal of a pest-eating device is to rid you of said pests. Once it eats all the flies, the clock stops working... so you have to encourage more flies. Or mice in the case of the mouse-eater. That sounds like it might have a down side.

    1. Re:Thinking more on this- by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      No problem. Separate the power generation component from the clock mechanism and put it outside with the cows!

    2. Re:Thinking more on this- by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Nah, leave the clock component on it. Digesting a cow will power the clock for quite a long time.

    3. Re:Thinking more on this- by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      The only winning move is to not play ;)

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  19. more direct link by hohokus · · Score: 2, Informative

    More direct link, more details, related contraptions (eats mice!): http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/dn17367-carnivorous-domestic-entertainment-robots/1

  20. Re:umm...why??? by ID000001 · · Score: 1

    That would be what Regenerative Brakes are designed for. Since Winds is fairly inefficient and actually increase fuel consumption.

  21. Re:umm...why??? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The power generated might be enough to run one headlight. But what would really be interesting is capturing some of the speed energy to help charge the battery. But with using wind.

    I'll do you one better. Attach a sail to the car so that almost all of the "speed" energy is harvested. Fans harvesting electricity from the "wind" generated by the engine propelling the car is less efficient than the engine just making the electricity.

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. always a catch by iroll · · Score: 4, Informative

    I figured it was too good to be true:

    Although, for now, the robots rely on mains power, Auger believes they could become truly self-sufficient.

    I like technology-as-art projects, but it'd be much cooler if these things actually *were* powered by bug juice--that is, more like bug powered 75% of the time, with a battery backup or a solar panel (or both) for those days when all the flies have already been eaten--rather than just being combination clock-and-bug-zappers. I'd be interested to see their average power production vs. power consumption.

    --
    Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
  24. Needs mobility by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is nothing new, in fact there was an even better robot 5 or 6 years ago in Popular Mechanics that did the same biological digestion-to-electricity conversion, but that one was MOBILE. So theoretically it could walk around catching and eating insects and deriving its power needs from that. Don't know what became of it though, I suppose there were no commercial applications.

    Now if the digestion can be made efficient enough, and if it can catch enough food to store enough surplus energy, maybe it could be made to breed!

    1. Re:Needs mobility by castironpigeon · · Score: 1

      A robot that walks around clearing the house of bugs? I think that's commercial application enough right there. Of course, if they want to sell it for $400 that's another matter.

      --
      mmmm...forbidden donut
    2. Re:Needs mobility by brian+ferullo · · Score: 1

      I have a cat.

    3. Re:Needs mobility by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      I have a dog, it eats cats to save the birds, which eat the bugs...

    4. Re:Needs mobility by stevied · · Score: 1

      There was also the SlugBot..

  25. Larger version needed by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

    Democrat school playground. Fewer moronic bad-science laws.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  26. Interesting idea... Let's scale it up! by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    Obviously we don't need to worry about carcasses, but if we can turn offal into power via bacteria that eats it... Think about it. Full-circle power AND recycling.

  27. Re:umm...why??? by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative

        Won't work.

        Well, it would work, but you'd always lose in the overall equation. By putting something in line to capture the "speed energy", you are forced to put more power out to make the speed.

        blah, blah, blah, energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it can only change states, blah, blah, blah.

        To expand on the idea, you could put a giant windmill on top of a car that could produce enough electricity to drive with. Unfortunately, it would take more electricity than you produce to make it move, because of the added resistance of the windmill.

        Now, having a deployable windmill that could charge the battery while you're parked is a completely different idea, and almost practical. :) Just like solar, it depends on where you are, and what the environment dictates. Alaska in mid winter isn't exactly good for solar. Most cities don't have a good sustained wind at ground level. Florida along the coast should be great for either, but you'll run out of sun and get extra wind when a hurricane blows through. :)

       

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  28. Great! Perpetual killing machines. by icebike · · Score: 1

    This seems a little over kill (pun intended) to me.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  29. Does it have an alarm? by Akuun · · Score: 1

    And if so, does it go "nom nom nom"?

  30. Great C by zolf13 · · Score: 1

    All hail Great C... and start preparing the questions (unless you are on a quest to paint Deus Irae).

  31. Mousquitoes too? by sysupbda · · Score: 1

    I will buy a series of clocks if it takes Mousquitoes. Transportable at best so I can hang it up in my camping tent...

  32. not ready for production by goodtrick · · Score: 1

    from the new scientist article:
    for now, the robots rely on mains power

    Also I can imagine that these "bacterial fuel cells" don't smell very good.

  33. I'll subscribe... by modi123 · · Score: 1

    ... to it's twitter feed. Hahaha.. I wonder if I can mod this to a bug zapper that powers itself?

  34. And for the alarm... by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Funny

    And for the alarm, the clock says

    "help me! help me! help me!"

  35. Also a bug zapper version by tazanator · · Score: 1

    The article also talks about a bug zapper version that uses the power to light UV lights to attract more bugs... so when the robots wanna take over instead of UV in will be porn to "kill all humans"

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  36. Re:umm...why??? by grx0 · · Score: 1

    The power generated might be enough to run one headlight. But what would really be interesting is capturing some of the speed energy to help charge the battery. But with using wind.

    damned dirty hippies, can't you just accept some tihings need to die in larger quantites to increase our survivability.

    --
    .' Windows 98 crashed I am the blue screen of death no one hears your screams... `.
  37. In summary by xcut · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It recharges on the fly"

  38. Re:You are doing it wrong. by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    Support PETA today!

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  39. Re:Bugs? Talk about having your clock punched... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    OK, some corny ones:

    -- Eating 'round the clock/eating all the time...

    -- THis may be clock with "too much time on its hands", hehehe...

    -- These roaches have "all the time END the world"

    This can be a NEW RAID Roach Motel (poisonous/sticky trap box) slogan/jingle: "Roaches CLOCK IN, but the DON'T CLOCK OUT".

    (Used to be "RAID Roach Motel: Roaches check IN, but the DON'T CHECK OUT".

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  40. I won't hang this clock over my desk. by quax · · Score: 1

    Everything that eats is bound to take a crap as well. Probably regular as clockwork too.

  41. Great energy gathering idea by Magreger_V · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the kind of thing we need to see more of. Energy is all around us, just waiting to be harvested. All of those little bits could add up to a lot of energy. Reminds me of those tiles that generate energy when walked on, or those breaks in Hybrid cars that re-charge the battery upon breaking. How about those watches that use your body's motion to charge. When Tech gets cheap enough I suspect we will see more and more "perpetual" energy in our lives(though there is really no such thing as perpetual energy).

  42. Does this change much? by anthony.vo · · Score: 1

    So instead of replacing batteries, you'll have to replace the flypaper? I'd imagine that being a lot more inconvenient.

    1. Re:Does this change much? by smash · · Score: 1

      Disposing of, and manufacturing the flypaper is probably more convenient. Less lead and zinc involved you see....

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  43. Re:umm...why??? by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

    isn't that kinda like what the alternator is doing?

    using the internal combustion engine (which produces speed, aka "wind", which is a resulting effect of the engine pushing the vehicle through the air) to keep the battery charged?

    And there is less wasted energy using the belt drive vs wind... since the air isn't actually moving it's the vehicle that's moving, throwing a propeller to capture the wind would be akin to putting a sail up (or as is used in drag races, a parachute), which would only have the effect of hindering the vehicles energy efficiency rather than helping it's energy usage.

  44. digesting mice? by tenco · · Score: 1

    Ewww!

  45. Digest = Poo? by burtosis · · Score: 1
    So, since I am vaugely familiar with the entire digestion process, I think a crucial step is missing here... It needs to be able to remove most of the moisture (BTW I have a seperate liquid venting system idea!) and create nice sausage link shaped compressed pellets with the extra material once the energy is spent.

    Not sure how easy it would be to teach the table to flush though...

  46. Re:ur doin it rong by jcwayne · · Score: 1

    Yes sir, mister AC, sir.

    --
    Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
  47. Re:umm...why??? by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

    I realize that culture20 didn't wrap his comment in sarcasm tags but really...

  48. Hang on! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    My iPhone needs more flies to finishing playing this video.

    My eight core, dual GPU PC runs on a large bucket of cockroaches every day.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  49. Video link here! by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
  50. there's a certain amount of not right to that by Alcoholist · · Score: 1

    "The pair offers an alternative design fueled by mice."

    That's so cool and so wrong at the same time. Because if you can feed it mice, then why not cats and dogs, or maybe a couple of humans...? The last thing I want is people to figure out that other people are useful as fuel. Too many humans on the Earth, looming energy crisis... could be more brutal than a George Romero movie.

    --
    Bibo Ergo Sum.
    1. Re:there's a certain amount of not right to that by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Soylent Diesel is expected to be cheaper than traditional bio-diesel.

  51. Powered by bugs? by pickle_in_being · · Score: 1

    Then what keeps the fly paper strap turning? Does that also works on power extracted from bugs?
    I assume that the clock itself doesn't know when there are bugs on the fly paper, so the fly paper strap has to keep moving constantly.
    And all of this works on the power of one or several bugs?

    Impressive if it's true...

    1. Re:Powered by bugs? by coder111 · · Score: 1

      RTFA the New Scientist article. It generates enough juice to power the fly paper strap and a small clock

      --Coder

  52. One good bug catcher I've seen by selven · · Score: 1

    is a water bottle with the top part cut off and placed on top upside down, with a sweet substance like sugar water or juice inside. When the bugs go in, there's a funnel to direct them into the bottle, but when they go out, there's only the small hole to get out of. Most bugs never find it.

  53. Roomba by srussia · · Score: 1

    I guess I could mount the bug module as an auxiliary power source for my Roomba which has already been modified to run on pizza crumbs and Mountain Dew spills.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  54. The Amazing Shrinking Man by Chente · · Score: 1

    Oh my god, I passed through a cloud of radioactive particles and I've been shrunken down to the size of a field mouse! Now my clock is systematically hunting me down using its video camera, and giant, piercing claws!!! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!! ...snort...hummm? Oh sorry hon, I guess I was having a nightmare, it was terrible...there was this clock and...