Slashdot Mirror


Dell Rugged Laptops Not Quite Tough Enough

An anonymous reader writes "Trusted Reviews has put the new Dell XFR rugged laptop through the grinder and it hasn't fared as well as expected. Considering that these guys drove a car over a Panasonic Toughbook, they went pretty easy on the Dell, but it still couldn't take the punishment. It looks like Dell still has a way to go to steal the ball from Panasonic when it comes to all terrain computing."

225 comments

  1. I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the Dell blends after all!

  2. Interesting... by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 0, Informative

    But as for ruggedness testing, do you think that they were going a little overboard? I have been using my Latitude D810 for about four years now, have dropped it multiple times at the airport, the wife stepped on it while the lid was shut, and my aging cat urinated on the keyboard. Thing is that it still works. I am impressed with Dell's quality for the higher-end models made to withstand abuse. I would have bought two or three HPs in the time that I have had my Latitude. End of story for me.

    1. Re:Interesting... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Entirely context dependent. Their testing would be excessive if it were performed on an ordinary "it'd be nice if it survives the daily grind for a few years, and not feeling like cheap plastic crap is always a bonus; but no actual claims are made" laptop. Yours is one of those.

      However, this is the special OMG-MIL-SPEC, super durable, extra rugged, no-expense-spared model. If Dell wants to sell a machine in that segment, this sort of testing is perfectly appropriate.

    2. Re:Interesting... by Kagato · · Score: 3, Informative

      This isn't a uber traveler laptop. It's for people working in harsh environments. Do you work on an oil rig, war zone or the middle of the amazon? If you answer no, then you don't need a rugged laptop.

    3. Re:Interesting... by hughk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A construction site would qualify. Normal laptops can't really go outside site offices because of the copious quantities of general shit floating around (dust, water, temperature extremes, etc).

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    4. Re:Interesting... by hughk · · Score: 1

      The Lats aren't at all bad, but for home/office/general light travel only. I wouldn't think of dragging mine up a mountain or something.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:Interesting... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      But as for ruggedness testing, do you think that they were going a little overboard? I have been using my Latitude D810 for about four years now, have dropped it multiple times at the airport, the wife stepped on it while the lid was shut, and my aging cat urinated on the keyboard. Thing is that it still works. I am impressed with Dell's quality for the higher-end models made to withstand abuse. I would have bought two or three HPs in the time that I have had my Latitude. End of story for me.

      Overboard?

      You do understand what a "rugged laptop" is, right?

      These are things like the Panasonic Toughbookdaily basis. They're supposed to be used at construction sites, or by the military.

      I've seen Toughbooks get run over by cars and keep working.

      They've typically got a metal case, as opposed to plastic. They've usually got plenty of vibration dampening and shock absorption built in. Their ports are usually somehow protected from foreign objects and/or moisture. They're usually underclocked or cooled at least partly passively, so they don't have as much trouble with dusty environments.

      Fine, your Dell is fairly durable for a more-or-less normal home/office environment. That's great. But when you call a laptop "rugged" people expect a bit more than resistance to cat urine.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    6. Re:Interesting... by bdsesq · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and my aging cat urinated on the keyboard...

      Some years ago my cat urinated on my Apple powerbook. It never worked again. There were no Apple stores then so I had to take it to CompUSA, again and again and again.
      It was Toast!

      Looks like Dell wins the pissing contest!

    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I know, "annecdote", but I have three Latitude D820 boxes and they are terrible. I'm not sure if the problem was the third party design company Dell uses, nVidia, or what - but somebody messed up pretty big on the thermal requirements of the nVidia onboard GPU and the things start to overheat so badly that they hit thermal shutdown and just turn off while you are using them. Out of the three, 2 of them have had the mainboard, heatsink, and fan replaced twice and the third has had that all replaced once. Thankfully I had the three year warranty (which is about to expire). From my experience with them and my good experience with Lenovo at work (I am a tech lead for desktop/notebook with 90,000 seats) - I won't buy another Dell notebook and will be getting the follow on to the X200s when it comes out.

    8. Re:Interesting... by aicrules · · Score: 4, Funny

      my aging cat, may he rest in peace, urinated on the keyboard

      That is how that line should have read.

    9. Re:Interesting... by marcobat · · Score: 1

      I clicked on "parent" to reply to this post but it didn't do what i expected!? I wanted to add "Do you work on an oil rig, war zone or the middle of the amazon" or are you a parent? Anybody with small children around the house needs a rugged laptop.

    10. Re:Interesting... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I'd blend the cat.

      "May he rest as liquid" is how it should have read.

    11. Re:Interesting... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, no, the line is "may he rest in pees".

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Interesting... by hughk · · Score: 1

      Had a D810 and now have an 830. The 810 had dual external fans but the 820/830 has just one. My issue relevant to this is that the cooling system is an incredibly efficient vacuum cleaner for the desk. All the shit gets sucked up and ends up in a general pile of crud which usually lodges in the heat sink. The tip I got from a Dell tech after the first such incident is to put a vacuum cleaner on max to the air intake on the bottom - with the machine switched off. This seems to successfully uncruft the heat sink.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    13. Re:Interesting... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I have to agree as I work with a lot of construction SMBs and the amount of funk that gets into machines at some of these job-sites is just crazy. I have cracked open cases and found solid masses of sawdust, smoke, and other serious funk. On job-sites where there is plenty of construction going on a 'tough book" style laptop if you are gonna be mobile is a must.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or someone like myself, who wants to buy exactly ONE laptop that will last forever, and which I do not wish to have to protect like a newborn infant.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Interesting... by jplopez · · Score: 1

      and my aging cat urinated on the keyboard.

      Please remark this if you ever try to sell it on eBay. I mean your Dell, not the cat, of course.

    16. Re:Interesting... by Alastor187 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think they even showed the whole test, or they did it wrong. The MIL-STD-810 drop test is actually 26 total drops. Once on each face, edge, and corner.

      They didn't show if they actually measure 4' or just eye-balled it. Also, they were dropping onto some kind of surface, but not directly on the ground. That can have a large influence on the amount of energy transferred to the laptop during the test. Where I work when we do a drop test we do it on a bare concrete floor, and there is fixture to ensure the exact height is used.

    17. Re:Interesting... by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, no amount of "ruggedizing" can prevent obsolescence.

    18. Re:Interesting... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      I work with people who require laptops where surviving being run over by a truck is a minimum requirement, because that or worse is a distinct possibility. Things like dropping a laptop from 20 feet up onto concrete because you had more residual lubricant on your gloved hand than you realized happen on occasion.

      If you're going to spend $3,000+ on a ruggedized laptop, it should be able to handle anything. The ToughBook line comes pretty close, but apparently Dell is nowhere close.

      On the other hand, I do not understand why Panasonic drivers change for every single component of every model of a particular line (cf-30k vs cf-30n, for example). Sure I could see some parts being different, but a different MODEM for each version? Really?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    19. Re:Interesting... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They've typically got a metal case

      Not just generic steel or aluminum, Toughbooks have titanium cases, to keep them light, stiff, and strong. Now you can get a Toughbook with a solid state drive, and the biggest weakness to the system is eliminated. With an SSD on board, it becomes extremely difficult to damage the laptop. You have to hit something so hard you literally tear the components off the motherboard (very hard to do) or overcome the strength of the titanium (which is not thin, btw) to crush it. Even then you're more likely to damage the LCD than anything, and destroying the hard drive would be nearly impossible.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    20. Re:Interesting... by hmar · · Score: 1

      My own experience with Dell, and I have had and currently support over a dozen, is that the nVidia cards are just crap. I have been using the Intel graphics, and they work fine. Don't know if the problem is nVidia's fault or Dell's. If you stick with the stock intel graphics though, they are fairly durable.

    21. Re:Interesting... by sevenofnine · · Score: 1

      Had the similar problems with my d820, due to speedstep it would hang around 1ghz on both cores due to heat problems, dell changed the inners like 3 times. Finally our company bought me a precision m6400 instead, has been spinning like a dream.

    22. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      True enough. But not everyone needs latest-and-greatest, or even fairly-recent; for some of us, durable is more meaningful.

      Frex, I'm typing this on a PC whose major innards are now 11 years old. It has outlived several newer machines, all of which annoyed me by failing, while this one keeps on truckin'. Durable is GOOD.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    23. Re:Interesting... by Auntie+Virus · · Score: 1

      Things like dropping a laptop from 20 feet up onto concrete because you had more residual lubricant on your gloved hand than you realized happen on occasion

      Yeah thanks for that. Fscking TSA... how you accidentally dropped it *up* 20 feet is beyond me though. And geez, ferchrissake change gloves after the cavity search before inspecting my notebook.

      --
      Why yes, I *AM* new here. Why?
    24. Re:Interesting... by iq+in+binary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not just generic steel or aluminum, Toughbooks have titanium cases, to keep them light, stiff, and strong.

      Magnesium, actually. Just as tough, half the price. Titanium would have to be machined, which would double the price of the toughbook just in machine time. Magnesium can be formed and stamped.

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    25. Re:Interesting... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I know, I know, "annecdote"

      Sorry, but it would appear that you don't.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    26. Re:Interesting... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      One rests in pieces, and the other rusts.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:Interesting... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      No disagreement here, and I salute you. Care to tell us the brand name?

    28. Re:Interesting... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Magnesium's also easy to injection mold or die cast. There are some difficulties in safely melting magnesium (as this amazing picture showing a Volkswagen magnesium casting foundry burning in 2006 demonstrates) but it's far easier to do casting processes with magnesium, which melts at a very reasonable temperature, than it is with titanium, which destroys mold materials. Titanium also burns fiercely, and goes so far as to burn in a pure nitrogen environment, the only metal that will do so. Magnesium's also cheaper. However, it isn't anywhere nearly as tough. Titanium has yield strengths on the order of 40,000-140,000 pounds per square inch, while magnesium's more in the 20,000-50,000psi range. However, since magnesium's like 1/3 the density of titanium you can put a *lot* more magnesium into a structure for the same weight, and since stiffness rises as an exponential function of cross-section, you get hellaciously stiff, light structures that are reasonably tough.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    29. Re:Interesting... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on obsolescence officially at this point. If you don't play games and keep your OS clean then I'm betting a $300 netbook will be fine for any office productivity, browsing, movie watching, or any other non Cry or Caramack based app on the planet for at least a decade.

    30. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Clone :) Tyan S1830S motherboard (P3-550) of 1998 vintage, 3 W.D. hard drives (the oldest, IIRC is now 8 years old), LiteOn DVD drives, random swapmeet RAM (I think it's Panasonic, same age as motherboard), Matrox G200 video card (ditto), Teac floppy (15 years old). Just had to replace the 15YO PSU last month, original got fried (thru 2 layers of surge protection) by a major power surge. It has run 24/7 its entire life.

      I also have its twin brother, my XP media machine that is never rebooted (uptime record 14 months, lately disrupted by last month's storm) and has been running 24/7 since early 2002.

      The clone sitting next to it is a year older (and its oldest HD, another W.D., is now 11 years old running 24/7), ACorp/Supermicro mainboard, otherwise all clone parts. Needs new RAM stick (gone flaky), otherwise still all good.

      Conversely I have a large pile (about 3 pickup loads worth) of dead namebrand machines of all ages, from donations to our user group. From which I deduced that of OEMs, HPs are the least likely to die, Gateway middling, Dell and Micron the worst.

      BTW most of my household electronics are Panasonic, and some are over 25 years old.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    31. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Carmack not Caramack, you insensitive clod!

    32. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my aging cat, may he rest in pieces*, urinated on the keyboard

      * Tasty pieces!

      That is how that line should have read.

      FTFY

    33. Re:Interesting... by bvankuik · · Score: 1

      Dell Latitude [...], and my aging cat urinated on the keyboard.

      It wasn't your cat's age that made him urinate on your laptop.

      It was Caturday. Anything goes on Caturday.

      That, and it was a Dell of course.

    34. Re:Interesting... by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

      Wow, your PC is older than most of the people on Slashdot (mental age).

    35. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      LOL! Yeah, that's for sure :D

      Probably more reliable too!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    36. Re:Interesting... by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      And the reason that you run so many machines non-stop is...? For fuck's sake, turn them off when not using them, or at least put them into hibernation. Just because you can afford the electricity doesn't mean that there's no impact from your actions.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    37. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      One that's in use pretty much all day long, one that is in intermittent use most days and is also the multimedia machine (and being insecure is not allowed online), and one that does misc. tasks while the others are busy (or not speaking to the printer, as happens occasionally).

      Also, considering the temperature changes in here at night (down to 55F indoors), turning them on and off would create a lot of thermal stress, and the radically shortened lifespan and consequent need to regularly replace major components would probably more than offset the impact of what little power they use (none of them is a real power-hog; in fact they barely show on the bill). It does get cold enough where the media machine is that if it's powered off for long, it won't boot until it's warmed up for 15 minutes first. That's damned rough on the HD, both on the bearings and the risk of condensation damage (and it can cause data corruption too).

      Only one monitor on all-day, tho, and in summer I let it sleep when not in use. Can't do that in winter cuz it gets cold enough that it doesn't work right, or won't come back on at all.

      I guess I could keep my house warmer instead, but that costs about 4x as much electricity as letting the PCs run (and thereby provide some of my heat at no extra charge).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    38. Re:Interesting... by Amanitin · · Score: 1

      I think it should be pointed out that it's magnesium _alloys_ we are talking about. As opposed to titanium which afaik can support structures in pure form.

    39. Re:Interesting... by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I don't buy it. You're talking about leaving them on for years, not just in the winter.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    40. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Buy it or not, I'm still not turning my computers on and off 50 times a day. The thermal stress isn't worth it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    41. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This is why my main everyday machine, whose main innards are at 11 years old and counting, is in no serious danger of being replaced for being "obsolete". It still does everything I require of it -- frankly the only place it can't keep up anymore is ill-tempered scripts on web pages, and I count that more as a Mozilla problem than an aging-PC problem.

      And I'd like it to support more disk space... oh well, that's what networked storage is for!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  3. Does anyone use these? by wandazulu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen Panasonic Toughbooks in police cars, fire trucks, and in the vehicles of industrial companies, but I guess I don't get why; the laptops are well protected in the car or truck, and it's not like a cop is going to use it as a shield in a shoot out, or a fireman is going to be typing something inside a burning building. When a plumber came over to fix some pipes, he brought with him a battered Compaq laptop that was missing several keys, looked like it'd gone through hell, but was still working and wasn't "ruggedized" in any way I could tell.

    This is pure ignorance on my part...I can appreciate there is very likely a need, or they wouldn't make them, but I really don't know what that need is; especially, under what circumstances would it be possible to get my laptop run over by a truck as part of a normal day?

    That said, they definitely *look* cool and wouldn't mind having one myself, especially if I thought I'd need to check my email outside, in a snowstorm, in the Sierra Madre. :)

    1. Re:Does anyone use these? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think of it as laptop insurance. Just in case. Maybe you won't need it, but maybe you will. Also probably cheaper to pay the ToughBook premium than replacing your laptop a year earlier.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Does anyone use these? by AniVisual · · Score: 1

      The being-run-over-by-trucks part is probably just a marketing pitch, but the main draw of these ruggedized 'books is that they can withstand more shock than the average laptop. Where your standard laptops die after dropping from the desk, these can withstand a 2-storey drop, and some are very water resistant. Perfect for active engineers.

    3. Re:Does anyone use these? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two possibilities: One is that, through some mixture of poor prediction and being oversold, those users bought the wrong hardware. Just as many people buy "laptops" that end up spending their lives on a desk, essentially never moved, these laptops could well have been purchased to survive the Rigors of a Crime Scene; but then plunked into car mounts and not moved since. Not necessarily good planning; but a hugely common, and fairly understandable, mistake made by all sorts of individuals and organizations.

      Second possibility is that the Toughbooks you saw were the semi-rugged versions, which are much closer in price(and durability) to basic business laptops than to their fully rugged brethren. Paying a modest premium for semi-rugged features(keyboard that'll survive coffee and donut crumbs for several years, screen that'll survive the big mean keyring falling off the dash onto it, and so forth) might well be entirely sensible even if paying the substantial premium for the fully-rugged can-be-used-underwater-even-if-there-are-sharks-with-lasers edition isn't.

    4. Re:Does anyone use these? by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While they're not your every day laptop, there are some people out there who have a use for them. Once, while working in a computer repair shop back in 2002, a customer came in with a very battered old Toughbook. As it turned out, it really had been through a warzone, as he'd been a journalist in Afghanistan during the invasion and it'd been his companion for the last year or two.

      Despite its appearance, the hardware was working perfectly - more than can be said for the Windows install on it.

    5. Re:Does anyone use these? by 3TimeLoser · · Score: 1

      Besides the hardening, they have bright displays that are viewable in bright sunlight and backlit keyboards. Both are very useful features for those not working an indoor 8 to 5 shift.

    6. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used a lot in the UK.

      Heating engineers etc. use them to fill out their job sheets. Maybe not the one man band ones but the big nationwide ones.

      Some of the Police forces are using them and want them as the environment is not exactly friendly to normal electronics. And of course when it all goes bad and kicks off it's something nice and heavy to throw at the thug trying to kill you.

    7. Re:Does anyone use these? by semargofni · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coffee crumbs?

    8. Re:Does anyone use these? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Sure, the Compaq might have been alive but Compaq didn't warranty that it would. It could have died the first time it fell to the ground (as have many Dell and HP laptops I have seen). The Toughbook-series is made so that you COULD drop it and it will still go on and the manufacturer will either replace it or repair it if damage occurs to it. As in a fire truck or police car, the machine is usually protected by the car but it should withstand the door being left open in a winter storm, somebody using it that is dripping wet (due to rain or while extinguishing a fire) or if it stands a long time in the sun or near a burning building or if the car experiences repeated bumps. As for a car analogy: a standard Chevy Impala would withstand most of what cops put it through while being three times cheaper than their remodeled counterparts however, it's those once-in-a-while chases at 100mph and PIT maneuvers that the car has to survive although most cop cars (especially those in the non-urban areas) will never need to do that.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Does anyone use these? by fwice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At my job, we use these toughbooks in extreme conditions -- think arctic/antarctic desert and Middle Eastern deserts. Especially in the latter, the toughbook excels because all of the ports are blocked against FOD [foreign objects and debris] -- namely, if there's a sandstorm that kicks up, the sand can't enter the unit in any way.

      In addition, try using a regular laptop while riding on a humvee through rocky terrain. No way that disk lasts, whereas the toughbook disks are made to absorb the shock and vibration.

    10. Re:Does anyone use these? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Well, the firefighter might be using the thing with dirty, greasy hands. Just hose it off when it gets too dirty. It could also get smacked around a bit when someone wearing heavy gear is a bit clumsy getting into the truck.

      The cop probably doesn't actually need one, but then I've never actually seen a police car with a toughbook in it, so maybe the ones you saw are just there because the emergency services provider ordered a bunch for everyone.

    11. Re:Does anyone use these? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      I was chatting to a British Telecom (BT) engineer a few years back and I believe they have Toughbooks.

      He told me he used his closed laptop as a 'level' under his ladder when working up a pole on a sloping steets!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    12. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (coffee) and (donut crumbs)
      vs
      (coffee and donut)(crumbs)

    13. Re:Does anyone use these? by jtorkbob · · Score: 1

      Think about how police officers work. They are in and out of their vehicles in all kinds of weather. They might be doing a traffic stop or such and return to the vehicle wet from rain, and need to use the laptop. Think of fire fighters, who routinely get wet and dirty while responding to routine accidents and small fires. The insides of emergency vehicles need constant cleaning; if they didn't use a ruggedized computer the inside of the laptops would too.

      --
      AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
    14. Re:Does anyone use these? by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      I can say from experience that nothing I've used yet lasts like a Toughbook. Of course we use them in some pretty harsh environments. These are what we use to configure multiple devices on the side of the road. From sprinkler systems to signal lighting. Our Surveys group uses them for field surveying. I've got machines that have been used so badly they barely hold together yet still boot up and run.

      We've yet to break a Toughbook. We generally replaced due to our normal replacement schedule or we've worn one out which is saying A LOT!

      Unfortunately for us Dell is now our only approved rugged notebook vendor. I guess I'll know how they hold up soon enough.

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    15. Re:Does anyone use these? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      I've seen Panasonic Toughbooks in police cars, fire trucks, and in the vehicles of industrial companies, but I guess I don't get why; the laptops are well protected in the car or truck, and it's not like a cop is going to use it as a shield in a shoot out, or a fireman is going to be typing something inside a burning building.

      It is possible that they really don't need the Toughbooks and were just oversold. It wouldn't be the first time that has happened.

      It is also possible that those are the semi-rugged Toughbooks. They're more durable than your average laptop, but they aren't really built to take the abuse that a fully-rugged Toughbook is.

      It is most likely that they actually need some form of ruggedization in those laptops. A Toughbook isn't just built to take physical abuse like bullets and being dropped down stairs... They also handle shocks very well, like you might get in a vehicle if you hit something or had to stop suddenly. They handle temperature extremes very well, which you might see in a vehicle on a cold winter morning, or after sitting in the sun all day long. They handle dust and humidity well, which you might see at the scene of a fire.

      This is pure ignorance on my part...I can appreciate there is very likely a need, or they wouldn't make them, but I really don't know what that need is; especially, under what circumstances would it be possible to get my laptop run over by a truck as part of a normal day?

      Construction is a big one.

      We do work for a couple different building contractors and they love their Toughbooks. They're definitely worth the money. I've seen those things get dropped in muddy puddles and snowbanks a dozen times. I've seen fairly heavy chunks of masonry fall on them. And even under the best of circumstances they're operating in fairly dirty, dusty, and wet environments.

      When a plumber came over to fix some pipes, he brought with him a battered Compaq laptop that was missing several keys, looked like it'd gone through hell, but was still working and wasn't "ruggedized" in any way I could tell.

      Older laptops are halfway-rugged anyway... The old processors used to run cooler, the GPU was simple and basic, the HDDs weren't all that dense... There was more margin for error in just about everything. With the current emphasis on thin, light-weight laptops that perform as well as a desktop, there's very little margin for error.

      Having said that, however, I doubt if that plumber's laptop would work very well at 30 below zero... Or 100+... Or in truly dirty, wet environments...

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    16. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's how you can tell it's good coffee.

    17. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work in the IT department of small town Sheriffs Office, this county was so small that we had no official fire dept and just used a volunteer force, I assisted in servicing the computers for Animal Control, Deputies, Vol. Fire Dept, EMS and Emergency Management. They all used tough books and with good reason, it may seem odd with the laptops "mounted" in the vehicles but you have to remember that any of these emergency service outfits could be speeding down bumpy roads making various pursuit maneuvers are subject to shocks and bumps of all sorts.

      This doesn't even touch on the fact that most of the toughbooks can be removed from the vehicle for various reasons and end up being dropped, kicked and in one case I cam remember flying off the top of a squad car.

    18. Re:Does anyone use these? by interploy · · Score: 1

      ...under what circumstances would it be possible to get my laptop run over by a truck as part of a normal day?

      Construction. I used to work for a roofing company and the owner bought one of those tablet laptops to use when he went to do estimates and to keep his notes for big projects. He bought the thing new, but after a few months the cd drive wouldn't close, it was missing keys and both the case were scratched to hell. It wouldn't have surprised me at all if it'd gotten run over one day, or dropped off the side of a building. A toughbook would have been a much better choice. I agree it doesn't make sense to get one unless you're really clumsy or need to bring your laptop into hazardous conditions, but there's definitely a need. I bet that plumber would have loved to get his hands on one too.

    19. Re:Does anyone use these? by interploy · · Score: 1

      I mean to say, "...both the case and screen were scratched to hell."

    20. Re:Does anyone use these? by MaliciousSmurf · · Score: 1

      I laughed.

    21. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can appreciate there is very likely a need, or they wouldn't make them, but I really don't know what that need is; especially, under what circumstances would it be possible to get my laptop run over by a truck as part of a normal day?

      When I worked for a cell phone company, the tower climber guys all had these for performing diagnostics on the transceivers up at the top of the towers.

      There were numerous stories of these things being dropped while climbing, and the laptop survived.
      (I'm fairly sure they were the Panasonic models going by memory. I didn't know Dell even made rugged laptops until this article.)

      Just one example.

    22. Re:Does anyone use these? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I can think of many reasons they're a good value for police.

      Ever put something on the roof of your car, then been reminded of it when you drive off and hear the thud? Imagine your job involves being at the side of the road using your laptop many times a day. Throw in some incidents of physical violence and you can imagine how often that might happen in a year.

      Add in getting knocked off the car during a scuffle when the suspect decides he'd rather not get in the back of the car. Throw in the occasional 3 point turn where the laptop goes to the floorboard, stormy days, general bad days, and keyboard rage and it really starts to make sense to buy a ruggedized laptop. It doesn't take too many needed replacements of a regular old laptop to make up the price difference.

    23. Re:Does anyone use these? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would add that those that say you don't need a Toughbook for "just being mounted in the police car" has never actually been in a ride along. I have a HS buddy that was a county cop for several years and the amount of abuse and beating you get in those cars chasing a bad guy is just unreal.

      Lets not forget that trying to evade the law many bad guys will try to make their own roads, cut through ditches, medians, etc and the amount of beating and bouncing around you get in a police car during a chase is just nuts. I doubt a standard Dell would survive very long with the amount of beating you get in a police car.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    24. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The extra cost of a toughbook is significantly more than replacing the laptop a year earlier. Also, if it's insurance you want, then get a dell with their insurance (accidental cover).
      Rugged laptops have their niche. If you don't know why they exist, then dont worry about them.

    25. Re:Does anyone use these? by spammeister · · Score: 1

      Used a Toughbook in the Persian Gulf last year, needless to say it only lasted for about 30 minutes then stopped working. 110+F heat will make any laptop inoperable. Was on a military ship, so we had to keep it indoors.

      --
      I tried to think of a good sig, and this wasn't it.
    26. Re:Does anyone use these? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Construction site. It didn't stay in the truck because we needed it to check instrumentation in the field.

    27. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was on a military ship,

      Oh, so you work for a taxi company!

      I'm KIDDING!! In all honesty, thank you for serving.

    28. Re:Does anyone use these? by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 1

      If they're mounted in cars, they have to deal with heat extremes that a normal laptop probably can't handle (at least not long term).

    29. Re:Does anyone use these? by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      These days the hard drive is the simplest challenge to solve; you use SSD. The rest of your post is spot on.

    30. Re:Does anyone use these? by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1
    31. Re:Does anyone use these? by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      I was part of a project where BT field ops would get rugged laptops.

      Trust me, when I'm cruising around town and I see one of bastards, I always go for the kill.

    32. Re:Does anyone use these? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      This is why they are black now. A number of the first rugged laptops were painted green for military use and they discovered that soldiers treated them as they would treat any other bit of military equipment - and they weren't that rugged. When they made them black, soldiers treated them like office equipment and were more careful of them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    33. Re:Does anyone use these? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Ambulance drivers here in Melbourne, Australia use toughened laptops to track their operations out on the road. It seems to manage tasks from allocation to handoff in the hospital emergency room. A laptop with missing keys wouldn't be safe for them to use. It would accumulate crap and take their attention from the job at hand.

    34. Re:Does anyone use these? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I work for a company that installs, and occasionally rebuilds, laptops in police cars.

      We have a department that we service which started off using Ultra notebooks. Good enough machines, I guess, since they're just a rebadged Mitac, Sager, or whatever boxes like almost anything else, but they didn't hold up very well. Failures included backlight tubes broken or dark, non-functional inverters, broken or sloppy hinges, malfunctioning LCD data cables, broken power connectors, missing keys, etc.

      On the other hand, we have a department that installed Toughbooks at about the same time. The biggest complaint I hear from them: The batteries are all worn out, and the old Pentium III CPUs just aren't very fast anymore. Meanwhile, the machines still just fucking work. They tend to outlast the vehicles they're installed in.

      So, anyway, the Ultras were lasting only a year or two (the department has since switched to Toughbooks). The Toughbooks have lasted for far longer.

      So, anecdotally at least, the machines sure do seem to be better built. Add to that the public safety mentality of "it must always just fucking work, at any rational expense" whenever it comes to gear that lives depend on, and very quickly the preference grows toward "rugged" computers from Motorola, Dell, Mitac, Panasonic, or whoever, versus "consumer" computers from the same brands.

      And don't assume that they'll treat their computers as gently as you treat your own. As an elder co-worker of mine told me once, "they aren't always too nice to these cars."

      (ObDisclaimer: I've unintentionally put my 4.5 year old Dell Inspiron 6000i through many of the same tests seen in the video in the article, except for the water, without any lasting damage. The main problems that I have with the machine is that the display hinges have a bad design for their mounting points, which causes the screws to loosen over time in even normal use, and that the hard drive died after I used it at length outside in most days one particularly cold January. But perhaps I'm not as abusive as I think I am.

      ObFurtherDisclaimer: I tried to use my boss's rugged Motorola laptop in 5F, windy weather on a rooftop one day, and the machine never even booted up. Seems the thing is so rugged that it has a heater for the hard drive, to solve the very problem I experienced with my own Dell, except that after a half hour of waiting for it to warm up and, you know, work, I gave up and moved on to other instrumentation.))

    35. Re:Does anyone use these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried to get donut sprinkles out of a laptop keyboard? That is why they have toughbooks in police cars...

    36. Re:Does anyone use these? by sys_mast · · Score: 1

      The reason you always see them in cars is that the two under discussion (Panasonic/dell) are the only two that have automotive docks. And by automotive dock, I'm saying a docking station that is integrated into a pedestal that is designed to be bolted to a vehicle floor.

      Does this mean you couldn't use any standard dock with it's matching standard laptop, well no. But that would be home brew, and I'm guessing would not work for very long under the vibrations produced from a running and moving vehicle.

      But I generally agree with the article, (am i allowed to do that here?) the Dell rugged books don't seem any more durable than the old "D" series, which just a few years ago was the standard business laptop. The "D" series in my, meaningless, opinion was a good durable laptop, not a rugged, but good. The new "E" series seem cheaper than the home grade laptops of a few years ago. One demo E series finger pressure on the hing side would release the latches on the other side!!!

      --
      Those who can, do.
  4. Did the submitter even RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Er, what? This Slashdot summary does not jive with the article at all. The laptop was perfectly functional after all of their tests. The only problems they had were a minor cosmetic issue of the adhesive coming off around the trackpad (which they just called "fit and finish") and that some of the doors might pop open during drops since they weren't double locked. Their conclusion was that it was indeed quite rugged.

    1. Re:Did the submitter even RTFA? by kLaNk · · Score: 1

      Er, what? This Slashdot summary does not jive with the article at all. The laptop was perfectly functional after all of their tests.

      I had the exact same thought.

      I believe a quote from the video was even something to the extent of "this is a good option to the Toughbook for people who needed the extra processing power".

    2. Re:Did the submitter even RTFA? by Shag · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did *you* RTFA? They stated quite clearly that the Dell had issues with water ingress, including water getting into a battery compartment that isn't isolated from the mainboard.

      Yes, it worked again after they let it dry out for a day... but that's bad.

      I volunteer somewhere that bought one of these Dells, and honestly I have no idea why they needed a ruggedized laptop.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    3. Re:Did the submitter even RTFA? by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Except the summary talks about running it over with a car and eludes to it being destroyed.
      The fact that water is a problem was never stated.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    4. Re:Did the submitter even RTFA? by Blapto · · Score: 1

      The summary says they ran over a competitor's model with a car, not the Dell.

    5. Re:Did the submitter even RTFA? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      No that was not the only problem

      "the system's ingress protection is less than perfect. While the XFR did remain operational after we doused it with water, when we returned the next day the system wouldn't boot.Opening up the various 'sealed' doors revealed that some moisture (we're not talking torrents here) had seeped in, particularly in the large battery compartment at the rear, which isn't isolated from the system board! We left the system to dry for a day and sure enough it did boot up, but it's hardly an ideal scenario to deal with if your system ever does get exposed to the elements. "

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  5. What about Thinkpads? by mcvos · · Score: 1

    Did they compare the Dells to regular Thinkpads? They're not officially ruggedized, but they can take an awful lot of punishment.

    Incidentally, I just had a book shelf collapse under its load of books (apparently I wasn't supposed to stack them that high) and fall on my open Macbook. Huge dent next to the keyboard, but everything works fine.

    1. Re:What about Thinkpads? by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      FWIW, somebody picked up my MacBook to see how heavy it was, and managed to drop it off the desk. Roughly 3 feet. Still works fine, though there is a hefty dent in corner of the metal body that impacted the floor.

      I probably just got lucky on this, though; I don't think the MacBook is any more rugged than a regular laptop.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    2. Re:What about Thinkpads? by sjbe · · Score: 5, Funny

      FWIW, somebody picked up my MacBook to see how heavy it was, and managed to drop it off the desk.

      How long did it take you to remove your hands from their throat?

    3. Re:What about Thinkpads? by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      How long did it take you to remove your hands from their throat?

      I wish. I wasn't even there -- I was out to lunch, and only got the story from colleagues who witnessed it after I came back and wondered who the hell put a dent in my laptop. And the culprit was a leading member of our company's Board of Directors who happened to be walking past my desk at the time.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    4. Re:What about Thinkpads? by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may find that with such a blemish, any AppleCare warranty support is now void.

      My brother's MBP had a video card with a known issue where some times the video card would not output any video (either to the LCD or to the display port). He had the exact model number which experiences this problem, and supposedly every MBP with that model video card is affected and eligible for free repair even out of warranty.

      He took them up on it (he was still under AppleCare, having bought the extended version), but because there was a dent in his case, they claimed the video card was damaged by the dent, and they further claimed they would not be able to repair the damage without replacing the entire chassis. I had seen the dent, it was very small; more of a scratch and a dimple - there's no way this was responsible.

      What should have been a free repair cost him $800.

    5. Re:What about Thinkpads? by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      No need - a little red light comes on somewhere in Cupertino and Steve picks up a phone and calls a team of highly trained ninjas to deal with it.

      Steve: Hello ninjas?
      Ninjas: Yes?
      Steve: A non-Apple user just dropped one of our brethren's Macbooks.
      Ninjas: Again?
      Steve: Yup.
      Ninjas: We're on it. You want the head in a jar again for your collection?
      Steve: Sure, can you maybe grab his liver too... you never know...

      Disclaimer: I am an Apple user, so this is probably not accurate. I'll bet Phil Schiller handles the ninja calls.

    6. Re:What about Thinkpads? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If they admitted to it and if the laptop was a personal item, I'd make them pay. You can bet your job that they'd do the same if you dented their laptop.

    7. Re:What about Thinkpads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the Apple jokes more so than most - but that liver jab was cold man!

    8. Re:What about Thinkpads? by RudeIota · · Score: 1

      It might be a good idea to take the pancreas too...

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    9. Re:What about Thinkpads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, somebody picked up my MacBook to see how heavy it was, and managed to drop it off the desk.

      How long did it take you to remove your hands from their throat?

      I'm not sure. I'm currently typing this post with my nose.

    10. Re:What about Thinkpads? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      This was true until about five years ago when Steve outsourced the division to a company China, which in contracted the actual work to various groups in Africa.

      And you wonder why ninjas hate pirates.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    11. Re:What about Thinkpads? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Hey, lightning never strikes twice, at least not on Steve's watch.

    12. Re:What about Thinkpads? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they call Woz. After all those years he's still running the Dial-A-Choke hotline.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    13. Re:What about Thinkpads? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      My former boss also has a metal Macbook with a big dent in the corner. Works perfectly fine.

      I probably just got lucky on this, though; I don't think the MacBook is any more rugged than a regular laptop.

      There's a lot of very different "regular" laptops. Some of them fall apart merely from looking at them. Macbooks and Thinkpads may not be Toughbooks, but they're tough enough to withstand everyday abuse.

  6. Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0

    Dell seems to be taking a very different tack than Panasonic in this segment. Dell's target market seems to be military applications, which can be the only explanation for the high performance CPU and video card. Panasonic is targeting more mundane in-car law enforcement terminals, hospital information systems, and things like power meter readers.

    It's no surprise that the military customers would require a lower ruggedness spec than civilian users. They have no real budget limit, the computers are typically damaged beyond repair if damaged at all, and the PCs are typically immobile. However, they need to run fast and well when running, so the good CPU and graphics chip are musts.

    Civilian usage, OTOH, requires a device that is durable and lasts for years and can be used in any environment. They don't need great processing power, they just need something that can run their dedicated apps well enough. This is where Panasonic's focus on hardware quality really shines.

    1. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm at a loss as to why your post was modded insightful.

      - "It's no surprise that the military customers would require a lower ruggedness spec than civilian users. "
      - "Civilian usage, OTOH, requires a device that is durable and lasts for years and can be used in any environment. They don't need great processing power, they just need something that can run their dedicated apps well enough."

      I'm guessing your perception of military laptop usage to be something out of "Hackers?"

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's no surprise that the military customers would require a lower ruggedness spec than civilian users.

      And then there's this story that utterly contradicts you: http://www.toughbookuniverse.com/?p=16

    3. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by maxume · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about it not being worth ruggedizing against hand grenades and rockets.

      I'm not sure I agree, but I think that was probably the line of reasoning there.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by QuantumRiff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A Vet turned History teacher had a saying on his door...

      A computer with a bullet hole in it is a paperweight.

      A map with a bullet hole in it is still a map.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    5. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by HBI · · Score: 1

      Apparently so. We have a lot of toughbooks and the Dell version thereof (XFRD6300, actually). The Dells are pieces of shit. The Panasonics are less POS but slower and harder to work with - poor ergonomic design. None of them are fixed in place, though. They move a lot and get broken keyboards, water damage, and scoring of the screen via sand. Not to mention dead optical drives from the 'moondust' common in the Middle East (I saw more in Kuwait than in Iraq, honestly).

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    6. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      The Dells are pieces of shit. The Panasonics are less POS

      Going forward, which of these will be procured in greater numbers?

    7. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by Greeneland · · Score: 1

      not so fast! Check this out.

    8. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by MaerD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This reminds me of a trip I took once with a federal sales person who used to work with IBM. Around 2000-2001 he was working with some section of the Marines and trying to sell them some thinkpads. They were non-rugged, but had to hold up to certain standards just in case they ever were in use on/around a war zone.

      After telling them about the tests they did, etc, one of the officers asks if he can try something with the demo model they brought, to see if he could break it. The sales guy tells him to go ahead, if it breaks, no problem, we're trying to sell you what you need, figuring the guy is just going to drop it.
      Instead, the officer walks over to the laptop, pulls out a knife and rams it through the screen and pulls it out. Other than a hole where he shoved it it, the laptop kept going, no problem.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    9. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless it's an IBM mainframe, in which case a mainframe with a bullet hole is still a mainframe, just with one CPU showing a fault condition. Redundancy is a virtue whenever bullets are involved, whether you're the shooter or the owner of the target.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by HBI · · Score: 1

      It depends. With the Army at least, we buy laptops locally for use in our TOC (headquarters), but the laptops used for particular field functions are 'fielded' by central Army organizations - one in particular called PEO C3T is the blanket headquarters for various programs that send out 'systems' for use in the field, including ruggedized laptops. A lot of the C3T programs will field Toughbooks regardless of what we think, because it reduces their long-term service costs after the fielding. Locally, we may purchase Dells because the local purchasing people are looking for bang for the buck.

      Bottom line is that if we can get away without buying even a theoretically ruggedized system (Dell), we will. Most of our laptops are E6500s and Dell Lat 830s. I discourage ruggedized systems because of the excess cost and limited ROI in most cases. Also, experience has taught that even the most ruggedized system is not soldier-proof.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    11. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      A computer with a bullet hole in it is a paperweight. A map with a bullet hole in it is still a map.

      ...however the soldier who was holding the map up to look at it is now a paperweight.

  7. Re:Hey mods?? by eln · · Score: 1

    According to the moderation history, nobody did. I believe TrisexualPuppy starts at a score of -1, probably due to his long and illustrious history of trolling and being modded down for it.

  8. In my case, temperature tolerance... by moosehooey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A regular laptop won't start up at -40 after a North Dakota night. The toughbook says "Please wait, warming up" on the BIOS screen while it pre-warms the hard drive. It also works just fine when it's baking in the sun at 150, whereas the old Dell I had would crash at those temperatures.

    1. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Kagato · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's pretty much spot on. They need the hardware to work in temperature extremes. And even then I would assume they would by the semi-rugged model. The Panasonic Toughbook is a great machine. They still make them by hand in Kyoto. Panasonic doesn't trust the quality of factories in other parts of Asia, part of the price premium means you're getting a laptop built by a highly skilled workforce with a keen eye on tolerances.

    2. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I had my laptop out in the car during a cold Minnesota night, I got it to the office next day and started it, heard bad sounds, got scared and turned it off.

      About 20 minutes later I turned it back on, and nothing bad happened, it's been working ever since. Now, if I wanted it to work while still cold, I can understand needing a 'ruggid' computer, but for me, 20m was reasonable.

    3. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Interoperable · · Score: 1

      I'm sure cold operation has some uses but my fingers stop working somewhere around -10C so I wouldn't know what they are. On the other hand, I suspect that the reason that the battery died on my Asus laptop was walking home in -30C weather with the laptop in my backpack.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
    4. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by koxkoxkox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you have a right to use an idiosyncratic unit of temperature, but please at least specify it, ok ?

    5. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Looce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      At least we know the unit can't be Kelvin.

    6. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Kelvin is a scale, not a unit.

      The Kelvin scale uses the same unit as the Celsius scale, FWIW, but I don't think he was using that unit.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    7. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by quisxt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      -40 Celsius = -40 Farenheit. -40 Kelvin is meaningless. Seems to me like the op gave you all the information you needed.

    8. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Looce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But the post also has a 150; which unit is that in? (Rhetorical question, I know it's Farenheit, because in Celsius the user would have boiled away.)

    9. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • He specified he was in North Dakota. Temperature measurements in the U.S. are almost always in F, something frequently mentioned on /.
      • -40F == -40C
      • A car could get to ~150F sitting in the sun for a few hours. It's a little more difficult to get to 150C when something is just 'baking in the sun'

      In other words, use some common sense.

    10. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      He gave an upper range for heat, of 150 degrees.... Now, you could apply logic, and realize that it would still be meaningless for this to be 150 Kelvins (as that's lower than -40'F/-40'C), and that it would be in the range that would be lethal to a human being if it were Celcius, but the pedant will still say that he didn't actually clarify which unit of measurement he was using.

      You and I, however, probably rightly assumed that he was using Fahrenheit, but you just know that somebody's going to complain about it, even if it's obvious.

    11. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Context clues, dear, context clues. He said "North Dakota" -- a state in the USA, which uses Fahrenheit...

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    12. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Math, dear, math.. -40C == -40F. Nice, isn't it?

    13. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by littledannynolan · · Score: 1

      Minus Forty is the magic temperature -40 C = -40 F = Damn Cold

    14. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -40F == -40C. The unit doesn't matter in this case.

    15. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      -40 is the same in both C and F, so no need for units.

      Kelvin can't be a negative value, so you know it's not K.

    16. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by jfim · · Score: 1

      -40 Fahrenheit and -40 Celsius are the same.

    17. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Context clues, dear, context clues. He said "North Dakota" -- a state in the USA, which uses Fahrenheit...

      You DO realize that -40 is the same in both C and F right?

    18. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that it would matter anyway. -40C == -40F

    19. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Context clues, dear, context clues. He said "North Dakota" -- a state in the USA, which uses Fahrenheit...

      So what? -40 F = -40 C, a rare example of equivalence between the two.

    20. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, -40 is the same in both.

    21. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also said "-40", which is unique in that it's the same temperature in both Fahrenheit and Centigrade.

    22. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, it doesn't matter... -40 degrees

    23. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is a US site, and the poster is talking about a state in the US. Unless you're a moron, you should be able to figure out its degrees F.

    24. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      150 Fahrenheit and 150 Celsius are not the same.

      You're welcome.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    25. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      -40 isn't the only temperature he mentioned.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    26. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Kagato · · Score: 1

      The more typical scenario is that the laptop is in police car overnight in sub-zero temperatures and they expect it work when they head out again. Obviously the car will warm up, but the machine has to start doing what it needs to do without waiting for hours.

    27. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Well the other one is so far off the human tolerance scale in C that it's unlikely.

      Depends if a Toughbook could survive baking in an oven at 150C - I know a Powerbook G4 can, with only the screen and keys dying (ie, it boots up, just need to connect a usb kb and external monitor).

    28. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Well the other one is so far off the human tolerance scale in C that it's unlikely.

      You overestimate the amount of common sense exhibited by the average pedant.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    29. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Which part of "North Dakota" didn't you understand?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    30. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by hmar · · Score: 1

      And when you are sitting at 150 C do you really give a shit if your laptop works?

    31. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Meh. It's pedantry all the way down.

      I'm sure the first pedant knew that -40 is the same on both scales. All the pedants pointing this out are clearly missing the fact that there was another 150 degree figure which would be quite different depending on the scale. I'm just another pedant informing them of their oversight.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    32. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by sexconker · · Score: 5, Funny

      My home town nearly went to zero Kevins back in 1978.

      It was a particularly cold winter, and we were already down to 3 Kevins (due to their low popularity at the time).

      Kevin Thomas had flown out to be with his son's family for a wedding and got stuck in Boston for a whole week due to the weather. 2 Kevins left.

      Kevin Lemmer was rushed to the hospital during my shift. I still remember the call from the EMTs as the ambulance was rushing toward us. "It's Lemmer. He's in bad shape. Drove right into the fucking ditch." We called the time of death at 6:15 PM.

      At 6:16, all eyes turned to room 2217. Kevin Spencer was 82 and on his death bed with leukemia. His family being Catholic, he had already been given his last rights. If he couldn't hold out until Kevin Thomas returned, we would be at zero Kevins. Sure, we had 4 perfectly healthy Calvins, but they're just not the same.

      It was 7:15 when Carla Brooks and her husband James burst through the main entrance. "She's not due for 2 weeks!", James exclaimed. As the staff bustled around getting the Brookses settled, they exchanged darting glances with each other. This was their first child, and they wanted to keep the baby's sex a secret. Of course, in a small town, secrets don't get kept. Nearly all of the hospital staff new that the child about to rip open Mrs. Brooks was indeed a boy.

      The delivery was routine, and Kevin Brooks was born healthy, if a tad underweight, at 10:52 PM. Kevin Spencer was pronounced dead at 10:54.

      It was, as they say, a close one. Kevin Thomas arrived two days later, the weather having finally cleared up. To this day, we still rib him about it.

      Cedar Falls is currently at 5 Kevins.

    33. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 1

      Thus your post adds nothing. The people who would use a "ruggid" [sic] computer are exactly those who would be using it out of doors, in an unheated construction site or vehicle, etc.

      Of course your average laptop runs just fine in an office after warming up.

    34. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -40 at night and 150 during the day!!
      Where do you live the moon, oh wait you live in North Dakota.

      I'm so sorry

    35. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by hldn · · Score: 1

      panasonic -- because caucasians are just too damn tall.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    36. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Kagato · · Score: 1

      I thought that was Sony. I wish there was a mod point for Obscure 90's movie reference.

    37. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by RudeIota · · Score: 1

      Now, if only it could warm your fingers which would be frozen so stiff they'd be useless for typing. :-)

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    38. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It was Sony. What movie is it from?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    39. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod you up for this.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    40. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Is that a trick question?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    41. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I'm sure cold operation has some uses but my fingers stop working somewhere around -10C so I wouldn't know what they are. ...

      lol -- I actually make it a point to buy gloves that don't impede my ability to type. It helps that I have small hands -- I can get a decent amount of material on the fingers without them getting so fat I hit multiple keys at once. The gloves I use maybe aren't as warm as they could be, but they're a heck of a lot warmer than no gloves at all, which is the situation my hands would be in if the only alternative was to remove the gloves to be able to use my fingers. I used to have a drawer full of gloves I never wore because they were too bulky while my hands froze because I wasn't wearing gloves. Now I just buy gloves I will actually use.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    42. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But the post also has a 150; which unit is that in?

      Kelvin. It's the temperature at which Brits put on a thick sweater, Canadians think about putting on a long sleeved shirt, and Bud becomes almost drinkable.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    43. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's fair to assume that if he didn't specify a unit then he's the kind of person who isn't aware of more than one unit.

      So, Fahrenheit it is.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    44. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      The post I was responding to didn't mention Celsius or Fahrenheit, if you want to be pedantic about it. For all we know, he could have been referring to Kelvin, Rankine, Newton, Delisle...

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    45. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by DrWho520 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...part of the price premium means you're getting a laptop built by a highly skilled workforce with a keen eye on tolerances.

      Were it not that we had to pay a premium for this...

      --
      The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    46. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      Crazy People

    47. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      No. Kelvin is a unit. Celsius is a scale.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin

      Don't worry, you only need to read the first sentence.

    48. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Bwahaha, now I get to be even MORE pedantic.

      The Kelvin is not a unit. The Kelvin is a scale.

      The unit is the kelvin – lowercase K. Looce used an uppercase K.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    49. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

      Could be that he put North Dakota in his post so you should be able to figure he was speaking American anyway?
      You temperature Nazis are getting annoying.

    50. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What's North Dakota got to do with anything? I can mention the surface of Mars in a post, it doesn't mean I live there. It doesn't mean I come from there. It doesn't even mean I've ever been there.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. What about dust and sand? by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help but notice that in the video the guy pulled up the dot mouse thing, in the keyboard and there was a gap when he pushed down on the mouse pad. if they are going to market these as rugged laptops they should try to seal them a bit better.

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
    1. Re:What about dust and sand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's just the outer shell. my guess is that (as said in the article) is a cosmetic issue, and did not compromise integrity of the water & dust resistance. while dust will pile up that way, it will not get on the motherboard etc which is in a seperate compartment.

  10. Laptops should be able to defend themselves by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Laptops are weak. They should be able to defend themselves against dangers such as smashing into the ground, like this experimental Lenovo model.

    --
    "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    1. Re:Laptops should be able to defend themselves by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      They should be able to defend themselves against dangers such as smashing into the ground

      As well as loganberries, grapes, cherries (both red and black), passion fruit, oranges, apples, grapefruit (whole and segmented), pomegranates, greengages, lemons, plums, mangoes in syrup, bananas and of course, a raspberry.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Laptops should be able to defend themselves by daveime · · Score: 1

      Pointed Stick ?

    3. Re:Laptops should be able to defend themselves by Kagura · · Score: 1

      But did we do limes or not?

  11. Notsotoughbooks by juanhf · · Score: 4, Informative

    We used to believe that the ToughBooks were the end all be all of ruggedized computers; that is until the day someone actually managed to break one!

    If you read the warranty statement from Panasonic you will see the following under Section 3 - Limited Warranty Exclusions

    "Failures which result from alteration, accident, misuse, introduction of liquid or other foreign matter into the unit, abuse, neglect, installation, maladjustment of consumer controls, improper maintenance or modification, use not in accordance with product use instructions"

    That means that if your coffee somehow spills on the laptop and fries the motherboard Panasonic will not repair it under warranty!

    On the other hand if you purchase a Dell or an HP ruggedized notebook with the accidental damage protection the notebook will be repaired with no questions asked.

    Considering the cost of the Panasonic ToughBooks, I would take a Dell XFR + CompleteCare any day!

    Besides, regardless of what notebook you own, if you roll over it with your vehicle (by accident) and it happens to break, would you not rather be covered?

    1. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Kagato · · Score: 2, Informative

      Panasonic, just like Dell and HP, has an accidental damage plan.

      Consider this. What's worth more the laptop or the data on the laptop? You're in a rugged location, you're off the grid and can't back up your data until you get back to civilization, which laptop would you want? I'm going to opt for the one that doesn't let moisture seep inside.

    2. Re:Notsotoughbooks by darkmayo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are comparing a base limited warranty with an ADP warranty, apples an oranges.

      Panasonic has ADP warranty as well which like the rest of the brands has to be purchased, I am not aware of any company that has accidental damage protection as there baseline warranty for a laptop.

      --
      "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    3. Re:Notsotoughbooks by daveime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm at a loss to understand why anyone would

      1. Leave a valuable possession on the ground
      2. Promptly forget about it
      3. And then drive over it with their car
      4. ?
      5. Profit !

      If that is their attitude to their posessions and life in general, seems like they'd be better just getting an insurance policy for being a "accident-prone forgetful dumbass".

    4. Re:Notsotoughbooks by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      That's similar to the argument that Craftsman tools are as good as other professional lines because of the lifetime warrantee. Yeah, you won't lose money replacing the tool, but you WILL lose money on the time it takes to replace a broken tool, or having to do without.

      Alternately, the original Chrysler 5/50 warranty - it may have been the "best warranty in the business", but they were still total pieces of crap. And the knowledge that the fix may be free isn't very comforting at 2:00 AM on the side of teh road.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    5. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      First of all, Panasonic has an accidental damage replacement plan. You just have to buy it. Pretty much all the manufacturers have such a plan if you're willing to pay for it. So your point is pretty much moot.

      Second, a Toughbook isn't really purchased because it will stand up to occasional catastrophic damage. It is purchased because it will stand up to the everyday wear and tear that would eat other laptops alive.

      Toughbooks are designed to work in extreme heat and cold, in dirty, dusty, wet environments. They work in places that other laptops would simply choke and die.

      Sure, you could buy a Dell with an accidental damage plan... And then it would die after a week of use. Of you could buy a Toughbook with an accidental damage plan... And have it keep working for a couple years until someone accidentally destroys it.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    6. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Marcika · · Score: 1

      I'm at a loss to understand why anyone would

      1. Leave a valuable possession on the ground
      2. Promptly forget about it
      3. And then drive over it with their car

      Clue #1: They might get used by the military (where I've frequently seen things like this happen)
      Clue #2: They might get used by the military (where 1. and 3. might not be the same person)

    7. Re:Notsotoughbooks by koiransuklaa · · Score: 1

      A Dell with additional warranty is better covered than a Panasonic without additional warranty. Was I supposed to be surprised?

      "Protection Plus" is the comparable additional Panasonic warranty that you should have bought in the first place.

    8. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming a relatively calm environment.

      How about if you are attempting emergency repairs during a tropical storm? Or a construction site in general? PEOPLE get hit/run over in those situations, so it's not unlikely that a laptop could encounter that situation.

      Also, how about if you leave the laptop on the end gate of a 5-ton truck? The driver hops in to move the truck and never even notices the laptop, or that the end gate is down. Even if THEY don't run it over, someone else might.

      Now, to be fair - I don't think any of those scenarios are LIKELY - just possible. Besides, one of the reasons you buy a Toughbook is you bring it to places where Bad Things are far more likely to happen to it than if it were in a cubical.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    9. Re:Notsotoughbooks by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      When I was at Dell, we did have a customer whose laptop was run over by a snowplow... fortunately for him, he'd bought the accidental damage protection. Unfortunately for him, the laptop was a writeoff, and he needed to redeem the warranty for a new laptop.....

      What had happened in his case was that he'd slipped on an icy sidewalk while carrying the lappy in his arms. Murphy was out in force, as the laptop slipped out and landed in the street just as the plow came by.

      I'm just saying, maybe the driving over a laptop with a car wouldn't exactly be deliberate... in the testing referred to by TFS, it was, but there are circumstances where that kind of thing could happen without being intentional.

    10. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I'm at a loss to understand why anyone would

      1. Leave a valuable possession on the ground
      2. Promptly forget about it
      3. And then drive over it with their car
      4. ?
      5. Profit !

      If that is their attitude to their posessions and life in general, seems like they'd be better just getting an insurance policy for being a "accident-prone forgetful dumbass".

      You clearly don't drink that much, do you?

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    11. Re:Notsotoughbooks by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      Probably not the actual user scenario.
      1)Take your laptop and coffee to your car parked outside Dunkin donuts
      2) Leave the laptop on the roof of the car to have one hand free to open the car door.
      3) Get in close the door and drive, forgetting that laptop on the roof
      4) Laptop falls down and driven over by the next sleep deprived, coffee swilling, late for office driver behind you
      ?
      5) Profit

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    12. Re:Notsotoughbooks by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Considering the cost of the Panasonic ToughBooks, I would take a Dell XFR + CompleteCare any day!

      Protecting against damage isn't the usual reason for buying a Toughbook, it's availability.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Rary · · Score: 1

      I'm at a loss to understand why anyone would

      1. Leave a valuable possession on the ground
      2. Promptly forget about it
      3. And then drive over it with their car
      4. ?
      5. Profit !

      You'd be amazed what a little alcohol can do. I know someone who did precisely what you described (well, there was no step 5), only the valuable possession in question was not a laptop, but a Gibson Les Paul.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    14. Re:Notsotoughbooks by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am going to get two laptops. Then when in a fairly ok situation, say inside a tent backup from one to the other. I will then keep the backup laptop always inside a large ziploc bag.

      Nothing replaces redundancy.

    15. Re:Notsotoughbooks by kimvette · · Score: 1

      On the other hand if you purchase a Dell or an HP ruggedized notebook* with the accidental damage protection the notebook will be repaired with no questions asked.

      *or any model, for that matter. . . except you got one thing wrong. They will ask "where should it be shipped, and by the way, would you be interested in a nice shiny new Latitude or Precision today? Can I interest you in a nice new Dell printer [for which you can buy cartridges only from Dell]?"

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    16. Re:Notsotoughbooks by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "1. Leave a valuable possession on the ground
      2. Promptly forget about it
      3. And then drive over it with their car
      4. ?
      5. Profit "

      Some people use valuable gear in fast-paced, hectic environments where getting the mission done is much more important than worrying about beating the shit out of their gear, test equipment, and computers. That's why industrial and military equipment is different from consumer shit. Just the normal bouncing and weather exposure given Air Force notebooks on the flightline would make short work of most laptops. The extra margin of Toughness matters.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    17. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Shooter28 · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. Even if Panasonic didn't have accidental insurance (they do), you still want the better product. Toughbooks and those like it aren't about getting your computer replaced if it breaks. It's about having the most reliable and durable product you can have, because under harsh operational conditions you need your shit to work without having to wait for your replacement to be mailed to you overseas, or keeping a stock of backup laptops that you have to transfer new data to daily and hope you can salvage whatever data you lost that day.

      You want whatever product will hold up the best so you don't lose data/time/resources to mishaps.

  12. Yeah, they're useful by sjbe · · Score: 1

    This is pure ignorance on my part...I can appreciate there is very likely a need, or they wouldn't make them, but I really don't know what that need is; especially, under what circumstances would it be possible to get my laptop run over by a truck as part of a normal day?

    Not so much run over by a car but and decent sized IT dept will probably tell you that people abuse the hell out of laptops. Most of them quickly accumulate a veritable junkyard of spare parts from laptops that have been killed through various acts of neglect, malfeasance and random accidents. I've personally seen laptops get destroyed in countless ways. It's a fairly safe bet that a field service technician or traveling consultant is probably going to beat his laptop up pretty quickly. I've had a few clients myself where I wished I had something a little more rugged. We had one guy who killed 3 laptops in the space of a month through various acts of stupidity.

    I don't know that I'd get a toughened notebook for someone irresponsible. Sometimes firing the guilty party is sometimes cheaper. But I've seen plenty of cases where a toughened laptop is a good idea.

  13. Re: They're still making them by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    For policemen or many industrial companies, where if your computer went down it shouldn't delay service by much, or the service would be cheap to reschedule, using a regular laptop makes sense.

    But for other uses, like firemen or refinery maintenance technicians, who need to refer to building schematics and hazardous material contents before they decide how to attack a fire, or need to see maintenance documents to repair a piece of equipment keeping the refinery down at a cost over $100,000/hour, only a Toughbook or similar would do.

  14. Why the Toughbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked for the county sheriff's office for several years as an IT / network guy and can tell you that the more durable laptops are DEFINITELY useful in the police context. No matter how often you tell them to be careful or even discipline them, cops will be cops, and most of them are pretty rough around the edges. They toss their notebooks around, drop them, spill coffee on them, you name it. We had one notebook in for updates and servicing that looked like it had fallen into a threshing machine. My coworker asked the officer what the HELL he'd done to it, and he defensively said that HE hadn't done anything to it. It was his K9 partner who had decided to use it as a chew toy, not his problem. At least it stall ran. Oh, and we did have one stop a bullet, although nobody was actually in the car at the time.

    1. Re:Why the Toughbooks by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      No matter how often you tell them to be careful or even discipline them, cops will be cops

      I think the better way to put it is that "End users will be end users." It doesn't matter what your profession is. You could be the CEO, a janitor, or a Ph.D and still make the same mistakes as everybody else.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  15. Well built but not exceptional by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Did they compare the Dells to regular Thinkpads? They're not officially ruggedized, but they can take an awful lot of punishment

    Depends on your definition of "awful lot". My brother-in-law's previous company has used thinkpads as their primary laptops for years and the consultants there managed to kill plenty of them. A shocking number actually. I agree that Thinkpads have historically been well constructed - I've had several myself. But they aren't *that* tough. Certainly not much tougher than most other non-ruggedized machines.

    1. Re:Well built but not exceptional by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of "awful lot". My brother-in-law's previous company has used thinkpads as their primary laptops for years and the consultants there managed to kill plenty of them. A shocking number actually. I agree that Thinkpads have historically been well constructed - I've had several myself. But they aren't *that* tough. Certainly not much tougher than most other non-ruggedized machines.

      Indeed... My dad's got my old Compaq laptop now, but that thing is 6 years old, and it has endured an awful lot of abuse, including being dropped, kicked around, abuse from an angry cat, left in a car overnight in -47'C weather, sat on, in addition to the usual array of bumps and spills. That thing still works. There's a couple of bad sectors on the hard drive (40GB, but still has 99.9% useable), there's a few burnt out pixels in the LCD, and it's anemic with its 128MB Radeon 200M video card and 1GB of RAM, but it still works perfectly well for his uses. My own laptop is a 2 year old Dell Inspiron that has endured a similar amount of abuse, and is still working just fine.

      The ruggedization isn't really so much that it can take the abuse while not operating (though there is a clause in the certification that covers drop height while not operating, it's discussed in TFA so I won't talk about it here), it's that the system can take the abuse while it *is* operating. That Compaq may have survived being left out in a car, and temperatures that were probably in the -40'C range (I'm assuming that the car was somewhat sheltered), but it wouldn't have started up in that weather, or been able to keep operating. And that's to say nothing of the types of bumps/spills that'll happen in every day use in a warzone, let alone environmental hazards.

    2. Re:Well built but not exceptional by robot256 · · Score: 1

      Lenovo has tested several of their new Thinkpads to comply with MIL-SPEC semi-rugged computing standards. The results prove what you are saying, Thinkpads can pass as semi-rugged on many counts but don't compete with the fully ruggedized Toughbooks. Tests included operation at low atmospheric pressure, high humidity, operational and non-operational vibration, dust exposure, and the "mild" -20 to 60 C temperature range. http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/thinkpads-pass-the-tough-test-but-dont-call-em-rugged/

  16. Gives new meaning to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, where's my car?

    Dude, you're NOT getting a (working) Dell!

  17. The point of ruggedized by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering the cost of the Panasonic ToughBooks, I would take a Dell XFR + CompleteCare any day!

    You are missing the point. If you happen to work in any sort of extreme environment (very hot, very cold, very dusty, etc) your Dell is going to die pretty quickly if it even works at all. Furthermore there are jobs where equipment failure has serious consequences. The point is that it doesn't die in the first place, not that you can replace it. Take a standard laptop on a polar expedition or into the middle of a desert and getting your laptop serviced isn't exactly going to be an option you can exercise. And thanks to our good friend Murphy odds are it will break at the least convenient time possible.

    Ruggedized laptops aren't for office workers. They are for people who work very far from climate controlled offices.

  18. at least the dell has better video then intel GMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least the dell has better video then intel GMA why can most systems like this have that? there are people who do cad work who may need a system like this.

  19. General Dynamics by GrBear · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dunno man, I'd rather buy a notebook from a company that knows how to make things rugged, verses a company that makes VCR's and questionable quality audio products.

    1. Re:General Dynamics by That's+What+She+Said · · Score: 1

      I second that... Itronix (now part of General Dynamics) and Motorola are pioneers in this kind of product. They have been offering fully rugged notebooks for years.

      These notebooks can stand sand storms, rain, 5 or 6-feet drops and extreme temperatures. They're mainly used in government applications, like public safety and the like. I've heard the ML900 (http://www.motorola.com/Business/US-EN/Business+Product+and+Services/Mobile+Computers/Rugged+Notebooks/ML910_US-EN) from Motorola has been used in the Operation Desert Storm with success.

      It's a very niche-specific product, though.

    2. Re:General Dynamics by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Shame there's no mod option for (-5, Stupid Ignoramus)

  20. Bling Bling by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    So much for the "DoD's MIL-STD 810F heat, dust and vibration requirements"*
    It looks cool as shit, but that's about it. I guess the only requirement to meet DoD specs is testosterone appeal.

    [*] -
    http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/super-rugged-latitude-e6400-xfr-is-tougher-than-you/

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  21. Toughbooks live up to the name. by UncHellMatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for a small police department, and did considerable research before choosing the Toughbook. They're certainly not made for speed, and they're heavy and ugly. But they're not made for that, they're made to take the abuse that is almost inevitable in the hands of people who are, shall we say, not exactly delicate flowers.

    Before actually mounting these computers in our cruisers, I dropped the Toughbook while holding it above my head (I'm about 5'10"), I punched the back of the screen (only succeeded in giving myself a bloody knuckle), poured hot coffee on the keys, and generally did things you would REALLY not want to do to your laptop. They took it with just little scratches here and there, but no issue other than cosmetic.

    One thing I did find is was that, of course, the screen is tough but it's still a laptop screen. The clamps used to mount the laptops on a swing arm in the cars goes slightly over the sides of the Toughbook. If the screen is slammed hard, that can actually cause a crack. Fortunately I'd paid the extra dosh for a better warranty covering such things, and was able to remind the officers that they need to be aware of that issue.

    Dells offerings are really GOOD laptops, and not bad if you need rugged, but not insanely durable. I finally settled on the Toughbook not just because of the abuse I put them through, or just from asking other local PDs what they used. One of my users, a recent hire only a year or so out of the Army Rangers, told me that the Toughbook are what they jumped out of aircraft with. The abuse a grizzled old geek like myself can throw at a computer is pretty much NOTHING like what an Army Ranger could do.

    So far, the TBs have been worth every penny we spent.

  22. Re:Hey mods?? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, if you look at the OP's history, his posts are always followed by an AC message asking it to be modded up. Either a big coincidence, or Trisexualpuppy is trying to draw attention and upmods to his own posts.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  23. Toughbooks are resistant to all, but one... by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    The five-finger discounter. One operation bought two of the $3,000 beasts and one walked. They got another and it walked too! The last one they got I got them a cable lock and LoJack service. I slapped LoJack stickers all over both of them. That put the kibosh on the thefts.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  24. Re:Hey mods?? by eln · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, even when he gets upmods, he can't resist trolling for long enough to stay above -1 for long.

  25. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Dell has taken over from emachines as the computers built with the cheapest (and crappiest!) parts available, what do you expect?

  26. Re:Hey mods?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    The cat modded it down. She prefers being referred to as "mature" rather than "aging."

    And lest you forget, there's always more pee where that came from.

  27. Re:What about iBooks by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 2, Funny

    some years ago, my backpack's zipper failed and thus unloaded my 15" iBook down a whole flight of stairs; my heart stopped as I watched it bounce up and down every couple of steps (on its edges), all the way to the ground floor!

    Once I unbent the hook that would normally lock it when closed, it worked just like new!

  28. "The diet coke of evil" by Frankenshteen · · Score: 1

    "Not quite evil enough"

    --
    "It's a doughnut stuffed with M&M's. That way when you finish the doughnut, you don't have to eat any M&M's."
  29. Yes. These are necessary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've designed systems where over 20,000 of these were deployed. Hourly workers treat all their tools, like tools. Whether it is a hammer or a computer, doesn't matter. It gets thrown back into the toolbox when they are done. They are not particularly gentle and you can't expect them to be. The computers need to continue working in rough, jarring, hot, vibration prone, sunlit, humid, and freezing temperatures. We used both Itronix and Panasonic tough books. We looked at Dell, but there stuff was a joke.

    Even with specs to support all these different environments, we had to purchase 15% more to handle breakage issues. The hard drives were overheating even though our users were well within the operating temperature specifications.

    I believe that an average college student is fairly careful compared to our workers with laptops. I've seen multiple laptops left on the back of a truck, then seen the truck drive off and the laptop bounce to the road. A college student wouldn't do that more than once in a life. We've had technicians do something like that multiple times. If they get back and pick up the laptop, it still works.

    For anyone who may think carting these around for business travel is fun - forget it. They weight double what even laptop-replacement models weigh and usually only have low end CPUs.

    More and more industrial users are changing from laptops to handhelds or even iPhones to reduce the total cost of ownership. Remote access is such a huge productivity enhancer, that some kind of remove computing is necessary almost regardless of the cost.

    1. Re:Yes. These are necessary! by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the employees are abusing the laptops because: They know the laptop can handle the abuse, and they aren't responsible for the laptop if something happens to it. Your average student on other hand doesn't have a tough book, and doesn't have much money to replace the laptop.

  30. Toughtbooks are tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have Tough Books for our EMS service. I've seen them dropped, stepped on, tossed in the back of a truck or stretcher, everything. I've personally dropped my Tough Book and didn't even think to say "oh no!" - I knew it was going to be ok. They may be expensive, but I know from personal and professional experience, they hold up excellent.

  31. Compaq by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

    This story reminds me of the tail of the Compaq salesman when they first started making "portable" computers. He would walk into a sales presentation and slide the portable across the floor into the wall pick it up and turn it on and go on with his presentation.

  32. Depends on what one's normal day is. by lilyleftthevalley · · Score: 1

    This is pure ignorance on my part... under what circumstances would it be possible to get my laptop run over by a truck as part of a normal day?

    I remember one summer when I was working in Boston and saw a fella riding his bike down one of the cobbled streets with his laptop, sans cover or bag, strapped to the rear bike rack with a single bungie cord. At the time, I saw a lot of folks with laptops strapped to bikes, just not usually this poorly protected.

    After one particularly hard bounce, his laptop shot out of its bungie and flew a short distance before falling to the street. By the time he stopped his bike to retrieve it, it was already too late--he turned around just in time to watch a truck run it over.

    All I can remember thinking at the time was two things:

    1) How I couldn't wait to get back from lunch to tell everyone my first personally observed laptop horror story (I worked in MIS at the time, and we saw all sorts of sorry states of stinkpads, always accompanied by the most amazing stories.)

    2) One bungie cord--that's the best he could do?

    As has been said, certain folks seem accident prone, and some just plain dumb. I don't know if this guy learned his lesson or not for his replacement, but I can easily see how someone who rides their bike with their laptop attached would benefit from the extra insurance a more durable laptop can give.

    --
    Until progress stops, I'll always be a webn00b.
  33. dean.miller0171@gmail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks dude for the review.
    http://www.buyergen.com

    1. Re:dean.miller0171@gmail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go post on /b/, you'll be a lot more successful in getting this "dean miller" guy personal-armied there.

  34. sponsored by... by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1
    ... Panasonic Viera 600hz TV...

    "Trusted Reviews" indeed...

  35. Re:What about iBooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I unbent the hook that would normally lock it when closed, it worked just like new!

    You mean all your own files were missing?

  36. The real story here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that Quasimodo is presenting the Dell laptop. Seriously, did you see the video? Disney's lawyers are gonna have a field day on this one!

    1. Re:The real story here... by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Except that the Hunchback of Notre Dame was published in 1831 making it firmly public domain. Also they could have already paid Disney. I mean look at Shrek he's out there pimping toothpaste and vehicles.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused