Slashdot Mirror


SETI@home Project Responds To School Firing

SETIGuy writes "SETI@home Project Scientist Eric Korpela has responded to many of the allegations made by Higley Unified School District administrator Denise Birdwell regarding the difficulties caused by the installation of SETI@home, which led to the recent firing of the school's technology supervisor. One of the project's founders, David Gedye, takes issue with Dr. Birdwell's claim that 'an educational institution ... cannot support the search for E.T.' Meanwhile, the fired supervisor denies misusing school computers."

295 comments

  1. Idle computer resources by GofG · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Idle computer resources that are not getting used for anything else are worthless. Might as well fill them up with something, although I'd go with folding@home over SETI@home.

    --
    GFA/M/S d-- s: a--- C++++ UBL++$ P+ L+++ !E- W++ N+ !o K- w--- !O !M !V PS++ PE Y+ PGP+ t+++ 5- X+ R tv@ b++ DI++++ D+ G
    1. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.

      If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.

    2. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idle computer resources nowadays use less power.

    3. Re:Idle computer resources by pvale · · Score: 1

      I run Seti@home on 2 cores, and folding@home on the other 2.

    4. Re:Idle computer resources by xevocius · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not completely true. A computer that is idle uses less power than one at 100% cpu utilization. So it is costing the school more money for their electricity. It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night.

    5. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      That's a myth, actually. a CPU of a certain model running at 1GHz or 3GHz uses the same amount of power, and does so whether or not it's working. The only difference is the amount of heat (power) emitted when in use, NOT electricity (power) consumed at the socket. Electricity and Heat are two very different things, and it's only when actually performing work that the electricity is turned into heat, otherwise it runs straight back out into the socket, although your utility provider still counts it as used, as the potential is there.

      Maybe that means air conditioning had to work a little harder as some computers warmed the room up a degree or two, but that's only a few dollars' worth, nowhere near $1.6 million.

    6. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      450W?! What do you have? The one here (a older core-2 E6850, with 8GB of memory) idles at ~100W, and maxes out at 180W with both cores at full load.

    7. Re:Idle computer resources by hemp · · Score: 5, Funny

      If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.

      We've come so far since the 60's mainframe days.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    8. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What the hell are you talking about? How can something use the same amount of power, but emit different amounts of heat under different circumstances? Unless it has a *very* large capacitor or some other form of energy storage, or it emits radiation (light, etc), every watt used comes out as heat.

      If it is getting hotter, it means it is using more power.

    9. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except this is a school district. Most school districts have ancient computers that are only replaced after they fall apart smoking.

    10. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm. You can theoretically use heat output to *measure* power consumption.

      Power in = waste heat out.

      Maybe you are confusing electricity and power? Electricity is just used as a way of transmitting power.

    11. Re:Idle computer resources by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is slashdot, news for nerds. Nerds don't buy computers from Best Buy. Real nerds don't ever even shop for anything at Best Buy. Best Buy is where wannabe nerds go so they can pay higher than advertised prices on products that the salespersons know little about, but they still know more than the wannabe nerds. I could go on, but I think you get the picture, and the rest of the people reading this already knew these facts.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pair of Xeon X5365s. Fast, but oh so power hungry. First gen, and ~150W max per package.

    13. Re:Idle computer resources by NervousNerd · · Score: 4, Informative

      We're talking about school computers. Not the rig you built to play Crysis at 4096x3092 with all settings maxed. And I'm not knocking that, my rigs are self built, but most people (including schools) usually purchase pre-built computers from companies. And those pre-built machines usually have low end processors (thus using less electricity) and use the IGP. And, because of that those machines usually have lower end power supplies.

    14. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since it is winter now, if anyone uses electric resistance heat, then I can't see it mattering much if they use seti@home or folding@home. Electric heat is electric heat, and I doubt the fact that your also getting a few calculations done with it is going to matter much. Of course, if your primary heat source is anything other than electric resistance heating then it is going to cost you money. For instance, a heat pump might manage to add three units of heat to a house for 1 unit of energy, since it is pulling that energy from outside. This is in contrast to electric resistance heat which is pretty much 100% efficient, well, except for the heat your wires give off in your walls, since that heat may be partially lost to outside, depending on the location of the walls...

      This is also why I used to care less when I left the basement lights on at my parents house in the winter, since we were using electric heat at the time, and, the lights, were little more than little electric heaters... I've upgraded the furnace to a 16 SEER heat pump a few years back, which of course makes things like lights left on matter quite a lot now. My only regret is not knowing that the sound of the heat pump running is actually somewhat annoying, which might be a factor in where people decide to place them. Of course, if your really planning for the long term, then a ground source heat pump, might help with that as well (as opposed to an air source heat pump).

    15. Re:Idle computer resources by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      What CPU could you possibly be using that it's consuming 270 watts? Do you have a 24" HSF combo to cool that, too?

    16. Re:Idle computer resources by NitroWolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night.

      This is completely false and has been proven with reams of empirical data. Keeping a computer running 24/7 give a longer useful lifetime than shutting a computer down every night. It's a lot easier on the machine to keep it running and warm with a constant feed of power than it is to subject it to cold starts and sudden jolts of electricity... all of which drastically shorten the lifespan of many parts inside the computer.

      Add to the fact that even if a CPU had a certain number of "hours" in a pool that it could be used before it failed - the number would be so big as to be rendered completely irrelevant by the fact that the computer would be so obsolete and useless by the time the CPU failed that it would have been long discarded anyway. Even if you lessen a CPU with a 15 year lifespan by 30% by keeping it running, do you really think you're going to be using a 10.5 year old computer? In this day and age it's possible but highly unlikely.

    17. Re:Idle computer resources by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Funny

      "It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night."

      Very true. A computer fan spinning at 100% 24/7 is far more likely to suffer a early death due to dust and hair, as you can see from these photos:
      Dust in computer
      What can happen to the Computers of Pet Owners; with Dirty Pictures
      Computer Killers – Pet Hair, Dust and Cigarette Smoke

      If the computer is shutdown or in low power the fan isn't spinning so it's not sucking in dust and dirt.... or bugs

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    18. Re:Idle computer resources by Mr+Otobor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Real" nerds buy their computers... off the shelf and then quickly head off to using their computer to develop, write, model, proof, design, etc. things that are actually interesting and/or difficult.

      The days are so far long gone when building your own box was a qualification for being a nerd (somewhat sadly, but only somewhat.) Now it is a qualification for being a factory worker, producing cheaply assembled and cheaply purchased commodities.

    19. Re:Idle computer resources by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Best Buy does have some cheap laptops (they had a $200 Black Friday deal with a Celeron 900, 2 gigs of RAM and a 160 gig HDD) while their desktops are going to be expensive they have reasonable prices on their laptops especially with the cheap end. Yeah, if I spent another $200 I could get a better CPU, more memory, perhaps a SSD, etc. but as a nearly full-time student wanting a laptop to replace a dead one (and Ubuntu runs fine on the specs even with no memory upgrade and no slowdowns) the cheap laptops (actually got a $300 Toshiba with identical specs over the summer) are a godsend, I don't have much disposable cash to buy a decent laptop yet and you can't really beat the prices.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    20. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is completely false and has been proven with reams of empirical data. Keeping a computer running 24/7 give a longer useful lifetime than shutting a computer down every night. It's a lot easier on the machine to keep it running and warm with a constant feed of power than it is to subject it to cold starts and sudden jolts of electricity... all of which drastically shorten the lifespan of many parts inside the computer.

      Add to the fact that even if a CPU had a certain number of "hours" in a pool that it could be used before it failed - the number would be so big as to be rendered completely irrelevant by the fact that the computer would be so obsolete and useless by the time the CPU failed that it would have been long discarded anyway. Even if you lessen a CPU with a 15 year lifespan by 30% by keeping it running, do you really think you're going to be using a 10.5 year old computer? In this day and age it's possible but highly unlikely.

      Really? One computer I have is 8 years old. It is shut down every night. The only component that ever actually failed was the power supply and that was probably more due to the fact that I'm a smoker than to it being cycled every day.

    21. Re:Idle computer resources by Pyrion · · Score: 2, Informative

      This depends entirely on what "resources" we are talking about.

      Memory, I'd wholeheartedly agree with you, as unused memory is wasted memory, but that's mainly because your system RAM will consume the same amount of power regardless of whether or not it's holding anything of value. One or multiple sticks of zeroed pages is still data that has to be stored, after all, so you might as well fill it with something (standby pages, or "disk cache" if you prefer).

      CPU? That's entirely based around your willingness to pay for the greater power consumed by a loaded CPU, as well as your tolerance for the heat it would generate, and possibly the CPU's own tolerance for the heat generated if it doesn't have an adequate cooling solution (but whose fault is that?). This is, incidentally, why a processor's C-states are configurable in the BIOS, you can disable everything up to the C1 state if you damn well please, and you can even disable the SpeedStep/PowerNow functionality if you damn well please, and you can run the CPU at full utilization all the time if you damn well please, just be aware that it's going to cost you more than if you leave these things enabled, let the computer run idle when not needed, or gods forbid, shut the damned thing off.

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    22. Re:Idle computer resources by XSpud · · Score: 3, Funny

      Electricity and Heat are two very different things

      True, but I'd have to say that electricity, and your understanding of electricity, are also two very different things.

    23. Re:Idle computer resources by GofG · · Score: 1

      What? Building your own rig gets you the same power and components at around 75% the cost. While this may not be a qualification of nerdiness, it is certainly a qualification of intelligence (especially when building a computer is as easy as building legos).

      --
      GFA/M/S d-- s: a--- C++++ UBL++$ P+ L+++ !E- W++ N+ !o K- w--- !O !M !V PS++ PE Y+ PGP+ t+++ 5- X+ R tv@ b++ DI++++ D+ G
    24. Re:Idle computer resources by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Idle computer resources that are not getting used for anything else are worthless. Might as well fill them up with something

      And yet, Vista being a RAM hog when idle with that whole superfetch thing or whatever it was was considered a bad idea....

      So which is it? Should my computer always be occupying most of its RAM and CPU time? Or should it be using only a tiny fraction of what it has available?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    25. Re:Idle computer resources by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      SETI can use your graphics card as well...

      --
      No sig today...
    26. Re:Idle computer resources by brusk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really? Russian roulette is perfectly safe. I've just pulled the trigger five times and nothing has...

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    27. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night."

      Very true. A computer fan spinning at 100% 24/7 is far more likely to suffer a early death due to dust and hair, as you can see from these photos:

      Dust in computer

      What can happen to the Computers of Pet Owners; with Dirty Pictures

      Computer Killers – Pet Hair, Dust and Cigarette Smoke

      If the computer is shutdown or in low power the fan isn't spinning so it's not sucking in dust and dirt.... or bugs

      if the fan fails the computer will usually power off at a certain temperature not burn and die. replace the fan and its good to go. also schools are usually cleaned everyday so there would be lest dust then in your house which i doubt you clean everyday.

    28. Re:Idle computer resources by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you can't beat Best Buy's prices (on sale in-store items or HP machines). What you can beat is the components. By doing it yourself, you get to pick everything, so instead of having just one decent component in a heap of crap, you can have all moderate components that match up in capabilities. No point in having a 3 ghz quad-core machine with 8 GiBs of RAM if it's old, slow ram on a 400 mhz bus. And no sneaky 1 GiB of video ram on an integrated chipset that's robbing from the 8 slow system GiBs.

      Instead everything will match up with no bottlenecks for your intended application, and a quiet power supply, but in a flimsy, but adequate case with sharp corners that's a little too big aesthetically.

      But you're not going to save money. Get that idea out of your head.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    29. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, shutting down a computer significantly reduces the life of hardware. This is due to damage caused by exposing hardware to temperature change.

    30. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah...we've come so far, that we're looping back around. This time, the Internet is your connection and Google's servers are your mainframe. Cloud Computing: The way of the future!

    31. Re:Idle computer resources by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know how you think that you won't save money. If you bother to go actually research this then you'll find you're wrong. I'm looking into buying a new computer and all the parts on newegg are cheaper than anything remotely comparable pre-built.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    32. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you definitely beat the price. If you buy a shitty machine for $300, that you only use for programming (and the compile times will be horrible), sure, you'll be beat on price. But for higher end machines, the prices are way high up there, and you can easily get a few hundred dollars back from components.

    33. Re:Idle computer resources by Digicaf · · Score: 2, Funny

      In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

    34. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's good for idle CPUs? Turning them off and saving power!

    35. Re:Idle computer resources by Pinhedd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.

      If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.

      most consumer CPUs idle at ~40 watts and cap out around 95 watts under max theoretical load. That 450 watt PEAK power output is for system max load which never happens.

    36. Re:Idle computer resources by FLaSh+SWT · · Score: 1

      My experience isn't quite so dramatic.

      With normal internet usage (web/email/IM/MP3s) my power draw hovers around 210-215 Watts. Same activity with Seti@Home running, processing 8 work units, and power draw hovers around 250-255 Watts so I'm not seeing that much of an increase.

      (For reference I have a 2009 Mac Pro, 2.26 GHz 8 core with 8 GB of RAM)

    37. Re:Idle computer resources by war4peace · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been using computers for 12 years. I have never turned off my computer unless I had to upgrade a component (duh!) or I had to go away for more than 48 hours. None of the machines I used had any failures whatsoever just because being on all the time. Sure, I had a couple hard-drives which broke, because power went off unexpectedly, and also a few optical drives, but that's because I play lots and lots of DVDs and such. But motherboards, CPUs, graphics cards and memories? Zero failures. I still have a PII@400 MHz in my closet, used as a secondary backup server for my work (on a 40 GB HDD) and it is on all the time. And works.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    38. Re:Idle computer resources by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > replace the fan and its good to go.

      If you're replacing fans 3 x more often (due to 3 x higher usage than normal), it's going to cost more.

      --
    39. Re:Idle computer resources by mr+exploiter · · Score: 0

      It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night.

      This is completely false and has been proven with reams of empirical data. Keeping a computer running 24/7 give a longer useful lifetime than shutting a computer down every night blah blah blah blah....

      WRONG! Keeping it on 24/7 means the capacitors are more time operating at temperature. This means more evaporation an thus shorter live. It also mean that the disks are more time spinning. As many systems power down disks anyway after some time of idle time they have a power cycle anyway so there is no advantage in having the systems 24/7 on.

    40. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      No they are not.

          I do work for others at about $55 / hour. Just spend the time I did on researching the unlockable Sempron/ ACC vs Athlon II 240/245/'e" version vs an Celeron E3200/core2 duo HT/VT/x64 and the boards that support the various options [ firewire, esata/sata raid, 4x240 pins slots ddr2 [ i have a lot of it , thank you ] took hours. Frys sale on this, Amazon sale on that, NewEgg sale on .. wait there is a combo deal but it only uses ddr3 . - how much more will I spend vs my own ddr2 ...

      No, you won't save money.

      proc & board , $100
      memory, $80
      case $50
      power supply $30
      hd $100
      $360

      you could buy a dual AMD/Intel for around that money and have a guarantee and have someone with tiny fingers put it together and ship it in a nice box.

      I really have better things to do to try to save under $50.

    41. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only difference is the amount of heat (power) emitted when in use, NOT electricity (power) consumed at the socket. Electricity and Heat are two very different things, and it's only when actually performing work that the electricity is turned into heat, otherwise it runs straight back out into the socket, although your utility provider still counts it as used, as the potential is there.

      You're completely wrong. A CPU is made of transistors which act as electrical switches. These transistors are some from of MOSFET construction arranged in a CMOS architecture. The beauty of CMOS is that a digital circuit can maintain state without dissipating an appreciable amount of power. When the transistors transition from one state to another, however, there is a tiny switching loss that results from the conversion of a small amount of electrical energy to heat. The heat the circuit dissipates is proportional to the electrical loss. The higher the switching speed, the more loss per unit time, the more heat dissipated per unit time.

      When a computer is idle, most of the transistors are holding state. (Some are always switching because of the clock signal and because instructions must still be processed) Furthermore, most modern power management schemes will reduce the clock speed at idle because electrical loss is strongly related to clock speed.

      Heat is a form of energy. It can not be created or destroyed--it is converted. For the purposes of this discussion, it is produced by converting electrical energy into heat. That heat from your CPU adds to the power consumption. You can not radiate more heat without consuming more energy per unit time. Elementary physics.

    42. Re:Idle computer resources by BillX · · Score: 1

      I think the GP was intending humor, but although power literally is heat, and electric heating is by definition 100% efficient at the socket (P=IV=I^2*R), the amount of heat you produce between the socket prongs has no correlation to what the utility charges for it. As a simple thought experiment, imagine placing a small bit of superconductor between the rails just after the meter. The heat you produce locally may be negligible (or zero for an ideal superconductor)*, but look at that sucker spin.

      Enclaimer: IAAEE.

      * there is still plenty of resistance in the wires between the utility and your house, so the current across your ideal superconductor will not be infinite, and there WILL be some heat generated in the transmission lines. But that's not how the power company bills for electricity...

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    43. Re:Idle computer resources by Entropy98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.

      If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.

      Well unless its summer time (when schools are closed) and the school is far enough north you could just think of these PCs running SETI@home as electric heaters. 100% of the energy they use is being turned to heat, so some/all (depending on the schools regular heating system) of the cost of running SETI@home can be subtracted from the heating costs.

    44. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Celeron 900? Dude, 2001 called, they want their laptop back.

    45. Re:Idle computer resources by Pinhedd · · Score: 2, Informative

      you have no idea what you are talking about. It is true that power output is independent of frequency but this is only in an ideal situation where the charge required to switch a transistor is zero. As the CPU frequency is increased, the time between stable outputs of each transistor in a chain must be decreased. The only way to decrease the time is to increase the rate at which the charge builds on the transistor base, this can only be increased by increasing the supply voltage. As the voltage is increased the power output increases EXPONENTIALLY for a fixed resistance (current = voltage squared divided by resistance without factoring in integrals). As for your electricity/heat thing you're just plain wrong, the supply voltage (amongst many others) are fixed. Voltage does not equal current. Voltage applied across a closed circuit results in current flowing across that same circuit. However, since the CPU is a discrete device and thus must be doing something when it is on it performs an OS specific "no-op" loop. In windows this is known as the "system idle process". This process just wastes time, it doesn't do any heavy lifting and as a result much of the CPU's hardware is left open (no current flowing across it) and thus, the total current flow is fairly low. Low current at a fixed voltage implies a very high resistance over the whole circuit which is analogous of parallel circuitry in which a number of the circuits are open. If current is not flowing through your CPU it certainly isn't flowing through your power supply either, and your utility provider certainly isn't counting it as used.

    46. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never happens, hey?

      Except, as I said, when I use 100% CPU. I said it uses closer to 450W at 100% CPU for a reason, and that's because the system as a whole uses that amount of power when running at 100% CPU. Where did you get the idea 450 Watts is peak power output? If I run cinebench benchmarks at the same time and use the graphics card, it uses even more.

      I'm glad consumer CPUs might idle at 40 and cap out under 100W, that's terribly informative, but entirely irrelevant to the example I was using.

    47. Re:Idle computer resources by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Yet the average computer bulk-purchased by your local school department probably costs more than your gaming rig

    48. Re:Idle computer resources by Leebert · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've worked in cluster computing for quite some time (though I don't admin them anymore, still work in an HPC shopt). Know when you get lots of nodes on a cluster failing? When you power it down. Some percentage won't come back up. Same with disk arrays.

      We dread electrical work in the building.

      Seriously, power cycling computers is bad for them.

    49. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My time is more valuable than the minimal savings gained by assembling a computer myself. I'd rather spend it learning something interesting, not twiddling with SATA cables or burn testing memory chips. I've put enough together to know that it's about as complicated as legos and it no longer qualifies anyone for a "geek" card. A qualification for intelligence? Whatever, my 8 year old nephew assembled his own computer. Congratulations, you are as smart as a 3rd grader.

    50. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your description is accurate, but I'm going to have to nit pick.

      Electric resistance heating is 0% efficient, whether you have well-placed, attractive baseboard heaters or hand-craft amishploitation wheel-around heaters from Paul Harvey. It does no useful work. Technically, a computer does no useful work either, in a thermodynamic sense, but at least it can do *something* useful.

      More importantly, don't send hundreds of dollars to Edenpure for a 1.5 kW electric space heater no matter how attractive the full page ad is. There's nothing there that you couldn't get for $20 Walgreens. The only thing that's important about a space heater is safety: as long as it's not going to electrocute you or start a fire, you're good. And anything with a UL mark satisfies those goals satisfactorily.

    51. Re:Idle computer resources by ImYourVirus · · Score: 0

      Yeah like the employees at frys are any better.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    52. Re:Idle computer resources by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      If you are including the cost of your labor then of course its more expensive for you! Some chinese kids charge way less than $50/hr. For me building systems gets me intimate knowledge with what components I am running. Oh and if shit hits the fan I don't have to look for proprietary drivers on the Dell or HP support site. Pre-built just never has the right combination of components. And if I am not building a new comp but just getting new mobo, cpu, ram, gpu then i save money by keeping my hdd, dvdr, case and psu. I have to admit though, big box can get monitors for super cheap. But I don't usually skimp on monitor purchases and go for higher end models. Also, if you wanna geek out to other douchebag nerds you can call out what components and brands you are rolling. If you actually dont give a shit about the computer you are running and just wanna get shit done then you obviously have different priorities than those you criticize.

      --
      Balderdash!
    53. Re:Idle computer resources by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Yeah and if you download 1 song you have kept the MAFIAA from getting their rightly due $500,000 per song, in lost revenues of course.

      Not to mention that shit I read either today or yesterday about that woman that 'taped' ~4 minutes of the new twilight movie and is being threatened with like a 5 year prison sentence or something.

      It's all shit and probably won't ever end, just the corporations trying to get rich off of the little guy/gal.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    54. Re:Idle computer resources by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      Not to detract from your comment (or how wrong the comment you responded to was), but if every watt used came out as heat, then the computer would not function. In other words if all the electricity going into the CPU was being converted to heat, then nothing would be left over for the CPU to process data.

      The heat being released by the CPU is a byproduct of certain inefficiencies in silicon chip design, which can be reduced by some technologies but can't be eliminated. In fact the heat being released by other system components are caused by inefficiencies in their designs - nothing is 100% efficient, and this inefficiency is released as heat.

      --

      Moof!

    55. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are including the cost of your labor then of course its more expensive for you!

      Assembling components takes less time - for me - than fixing an OEM installation of Windows (countless uninstalls, tweaks, and reboots). Unless OS and drivers and crapware have separate DVDs/install routines. When building for Linux, much time is saved in not having to deal with non-compatible components. Lastly, if $50/hr is the value of the assembly time, consider many places with build for about $35 flat. You pick everything, they build it.

      The only advantage I see to Dell/HP/etc is the cost of Windows OS and Office ware is so much cheaper even compared to the OEM versions of the same. Luckily, as a Linux guy, this is not an issue.

    56. Re:Idle computer resources by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope, all energy in the universe is eventually converted to heat. In case of your CPU, computations are just an intermediate step of that conversion. By making the silicon more efficient you are just reducing the rate at which electricity is converted to heat inside your particular computer.

    57. Re:Idle computer resources by repetty · · Score: 1


      > A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer
      > than one crunching numbers every night.

      Citation, please, otherwise this is just idle speculation.

    58. Re:Idle computer resources by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Even if you lessen a CPU with a 15 year lifespan by 30% by keeping it running, do you really think you're going to be using a 10.5 year old computer? In this day and age it's possible but highly unlikely

      This is a public school we're talking about. I'd say it's actually quite LIKELY that they'd use a computer for as long as was physically possible, usefulness be damned.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    59. Re:Idle computer resources by sarahbau · · Score: 1

      A computer with dual quad core Xeons could easily draw 450w+ under load.

    60. Re:Idle computer resources by sarahbau · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's my justification for running SETI/Folding@Home. I only run them in the winter, and I almost never have to turn on the heat in my apartment.

    61. Re:Idle computer resources by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Troll

      I bought a netbook at Best Buy for MSRP on an impulse basis. I still have it, and recently put Karmic x64 on it (It's got an Athlon 64.) If you say I'm not a nerd again, I'll talk you to death.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    62. Re:Idle computer resources by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night.

      This is completely false and has been proven with reams of empirical data. Keeping a computer running 24/7 give a longer useful lifetime than shutting a computer down every night.

      But is this longer lifetime including or excluding the nighttime? How much do the power costs weigh into the prize of a new computer?

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    63. Re:Idle computer resources by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about having to pay for the OS (assuming you want to actually play games on the machine). There's no way you can beat the cheap pre-built systems.

      The top-end "gamer" systems on the other hand normally sell for double what you could build an equivalent system for, even including OS.

    64. Re:Idle computer resources by kdemetter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With BOINC , you can easily set the amount of system resources that will be used , so you don't have to use 100% is the systems resources.

      The point is , it's the schools money , and so it's their choice what they do with it .

      Personally , i think this is a great opportunity for schools :

      - the distributed computing project benefits from it , so they might make mention of the school on there sites .
      - it has some educational value : students will be interested in it , it can be discussed at classes , etc ...

      But in the end , it's their call.

    65. Re:Idle computer resources by Senior+Frac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This was the technology supervisor. So you're right, "it's their call," and I believe this guy is arguing that he was the "they." It appears now that some other committee is, retroactively, trying to decide otherwise.

    66. Re:Idle computer resources by selven · · Score: 1

      It only truly mattered back when you needed to do that kind of thing to get a PC running Linux.

    67. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have thought about building my own computer. In the end I always buy something good enough that matches my price target. My "designs" always end up unbalanced and actually building them would bit me in the ass.

    68. Re:Idle computer resources by mpe · · Score: 1

      also schools are usually cleaned everyday so there would be lest dust then in your house which i doubt you clean everyday.

      They also tend to be non smoking areas where any pets are not free to roam at will.

    69. Re:Idle computer resources by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      The days are so far long gone when building your own box was a qualification for being a nerd (somewhat sadly, but only somewhat.) Now it is a qualification for being a factory worker, producing cheaply assembled and cheaply purchased commodities.

      Huh? Showing an interest in how each component in the computer inter-operates no longer qualifies you as a nerd? I'll agree that the term "nerd" has greatly expanded to include a large field of specialized interests. However, an interest in computer hardware still qualifies. As to the factory workers, sure they know that part 4A6BX plugs into socket 893GH. However, putting that part into that socket 5 billion times a day hardly qualifies as an interest. Next you are going to tell me that soldering commonly available transistors, resistors, and other components together to build your own custom interfaces doesn't qualify.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    70. Re:Idle computer resources by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.

      If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.

      Well unless its summer time (when schools are closed) and the school is far enough north you could just think of these PCs running SETI@home as electric heaters. 100% of the energy they use is being turned to heat, so some/all (depending on the schools regular heating system) of the cost of running SETI@home can be subtracted from the heating costs.

      Unfortunately, waste heat comes at 1:1 efficiency, while most buildings are heated with 4:1 or better heat-pumps, so, while the waste heat is offsetting some of the heating costs, that only forgives about 25% of the cost.

      If you're paying to cool the building, then the waste heat makes things much worse...

    71. Re:Idle computer resources by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      do you really think you're going to be using a 10.5 year old computer? In this day and age it's possible but highly unlikely.

      This is a school system we're talking about, they might be purchasing 10 year old computers to start with.

    72. Re:Idle computer resources by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      A computer with dual quad core Xeons could easily draw 450w+ under load.

      For example, drawing a window in Excel on Vista with Aero turned on, or running the spell checker in Word, or making the second hand animate on the clock with those fancy shadows and glow effects.

    73. Re:Idle computer resources by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Good grief, what is your computer using for a CPU!? Most lf them max out at 85W last time I checked. You're not, perhaps, also running a graphics card at 100% at the same time, are you? There's a reason they need a separate power connection these days...

      (Although I can accept it might simply be a whole pile of stuff added together when maxing the computer out means it hits 450W at the wall)

    74. Re:Idle computer resources by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who build a gaming rig that draws close to 1200W under load. If money isn't an issue, you can easily build a system that draws a ton of juice. Just pick the most powerful of each type of component available (and be damned with things like efficiency). Dual quad core processors, four top-end video cards in SLI, max out the installed RAM, put in a multi-terabyte RAID array, etc.. It's way more computer than most of us need right now, but if you've got more money than brains you don't even have to try hard to build a system that draws 450W. There's some video cards on the market that draw 250-300W in and of themselves, let alone the other components in a system.

      And when I say it's way more computer than most of us need, I'm serious. For gaming, I have just as much fun playing on my 2-year old laptop, which only has a 90W power brick, let alone what it actually draws under load. Then again, he and I have different wants when it comes to gaming: I want a good story line and well thought-out gameplay. He wants the shinies. *shrugs*

    75. Re:Idle computer resources by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      No, the max load is every component asking for electricity.

      Hard drive(s), CPU, Memory, Motherboard, CD/DVD drive, etc.

      THAT is not impossible, but very very unlikely.

      I can think of one thing that can do that actually. 2 scripts that 1. rip an audio CD to WAV. 2. convert to mp3 AND flac AND ... {for every core} when the rip to wav is done.

    76. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not true it just means it is dissipating more heat. you ever purposely burn up a transistor?

    77. Re:Idle computer resources by fluor2 · · Score: 1

      My workstations at work uses 100W, even if they are 99% idle. Not much difference in idle and cpu load.
      Also, mind you, my workstations uses 35W when they are in stand-by, and even 35W when they are turned OFF! I guess this is because of Wake on Lan is enabled or similar.

    78. Re:Idle computer resources by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't speak for the average school department; but at the school department that I am familiar with, the standard computer of choice is the off-lease-refurb GX620. $200 a pop, monitor and peripherals included. Boring, but homogeneous and easily fast enough for all but specialized uses.

    79. Re:Idle computer resources by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather spend it learning something interesting, not twiddling with SATA cables or burn testing memory chips.

      Some people think that IS interesting. See also baking your own pastry and tweaking your car engine.

      I've put enough together to know that it's about as complicated as legos and it no longer qualifies anyone for a "geek" card.

      Geek designation being subjective, I won't argue that point. But saying it's as (un)complicated as Lego is severe hyperbole. I seriously doubt Lego sees as many broken pieces coming back because they were installed wrong as your average computer store service department technician does. Let's see...
      DDR 1/2/3 RAM for a board with some other kind of RAM. Or, just buying the fastest stuff out there without checking if the board can support it.
      Laptop RAM for a desktop.
      AMD CPU, Intel board. Or, AM2 CPU/AM3 board or Core 2 CPU/Core i7 board.
      RAM or CPU of any flavor, bought right but installed backwards.
      Dragging the board along standoffs and ruining the traces on the underside.
      Forgetting the standoffs entirely so the board is right against the case. (Bonus points if you start arguing with the tech that you're an A+ certification instructor and that's how it's SUPPOSED to be built.)
      Wrong numbers of or misplaced standoffs.
      Somehow swapping the +4 of a 20+4 PSU and the 4 pin CPU power. Or the 8 pin CPU power and the 8 pin PCI-E.
      Case USB plugged into motherboard Firewire port, or vice versa. Front panel sound plugged into whereever it will fit, usually a 13(?) pin digital audio header, but once into the IDE header.
      Thinking all those extra cables coming off the PSU must go SOMEWHERE and plugging them in wherever. (Floppy power to any motherboard port, typically.)
      Having the ground pins on the I/O shield INSIDE the ports instead of resting on top of (this is as common as dirt, I'm afraid).
      Not using the I/O shield and then complaining about the dust getting through the big hole in the back.
      Installing fans wrong so they fight against each other rather than encourage good airflow.
      Not grounding one's body before working, or doing it once and then thinking you don't have to do it again after you walk across that nice carpet to get something.
      Drinking pop while doing the install.
      Trying to recycle parts from a 486 era system into a new one. Like case and power supply.
      Assuming, at any point at all, that tin snips or physical exertion will be required to make something fit.

      A qualification for intelligence? Whatever, my 8 year old nephew assembled his own computer. Congratulations, you are as smart as a 3rd grader.

      Congratulations on forgetting every single joke about programming VCRs, using computers, and working remote controls with more than 20 buttons in the past two decades.

      But it's not as easy as all that. And never will be. A person can luck out, or do it well enough, but building ANYTHING from scratch has pitfalls.

    80. Re:Idle computer resources by Ltap · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that you would rather pay through the nose on parts because it isn't worth your time to do a little bit of research? It adds up, especially when you want to buy a "high-end" machine. In my experience, they won't screw you on a low-end machine that they sell for cheap because it has cheap components. The "high-end" machines are the same, they just have better components that the consumer knows (ram, hard drives, CPU) but have a cheap motherboard, and often no ability to overclock.

      If, on the other hand, you want to build it yourself, you can get a machine customized to what you want and often a machine that you can extend the lifetime on considerably through overclocking and upgrading if you buy a decent processor and a decent motherboard. Compare that to Dell, which routinely damages its own motherboards to prevent overclocking to try and force people to buy new computers.

      The fact is, assemblers and retailers are slowly trying to encourage people to think of their machines as something that must be replaced, not repaired when broken or upgraded when old. This is because it is profitable for them to do so, but it's EXTREMELY wasteful (e-waste only became a concern when people started treating electronics like they were disposable) and hurts the consumer.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    81. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you try to come off as so intelligent but the fact is that you're not. go learn something about computing for the masses and come back and read your posts and you'll see just how much of a fucktard you are.

    82. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And The Unknowledgeable, Bullshit-spewing, Moron of the Year Award goes to...

    83. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 years???? What are you like 17??? God, I've been using computers for almost 40 years.

    84. Re:Idle computer resources by DoninIN · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a despicable troll. Even to mention or speak of that debate which must be named or alluded to is to fear the instigation of yet another round of "Will my computer last longer if I shut it off or leave it on?" Which, even worse can devolve into "will my X last longer if I shut it off or leave it on?" which has already wasted more human lifetimes worth of time, and gigabytes of text that it is officially worse than hitler.

    85. Re:Idle computer resources by briareus · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you haven't even looked at such systems in ages.

    86. Re:Idle computer resources by DoninIN · · Score: 1
      In my limited but not inconsiderable experience fixing computers, and machines of other types. It's not the CPU or any of the best components that are eventually going to bring the system down, it's the cheapest switch or crappiest fan. In the case of a PC probably the CPU or power supply fan. Given the obsolescence curve for a desktop PC it may well not be worth fixing when either of those goes out, the CPU can more than reasonably be expected to far outlast the fans, the power switch, the disk drives etc.

      None of this has much relevance to the seti@home on the school districts computers. If they told him not to do it, and he did it anyway, they should fire him. If he just did it on his own without permission they should unclench, take five minutes to realize they're being stupid and get over themselves. Even if they make him remove the software. Committees and boards are truly the devil's playground, and no good ever came from either of them. Have them all thrown into the sea. (Someone should be in charge of things, boards and Committees are an asinine way to run things, think of witch hunts PTA meetings and lynch mobs. Yeah that's the ticket to sound governance.)

    87. Re:Idle computer resources by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      Or any government institution bulk-purchasing computers. I'm still wondering why we're getting laptops that have fingerprint scanners, 500gb hard drives and non-Intel (and rather non-entry level) 3D graphics chipsets. We even get them with wireless that we have to disable the drivers for anyways. We'd do perfectly fine with netbook-grade hardware, and I'm pretty sure I'm not allowed to install TF2 and 250gb of porn on the laptops on my ship.

      I love military procurement.

    88. Re:Idle computer resources by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It's one of the interesting things about the modern PC scene. You can now trade-off power / performance / cost and end up anywhere from a tiny notebook that has to hustle to draw 15W to those power-hungry beasts under the desk that are pulling 1500W.

      Personally, I specifically chose the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT w/ 512MB of RAM because it offered excellent performance yet drew fewer watts then a lot of the other cards at the time. When we look at CPUs for our desktops, we'll often choose the 45W part because it's easier to keep it cool without making a lot of noise.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    89. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds don't buy computers from Best Buy. Real nerds don't ever even shop for anything at Best Buy.

      Well, I'm a real nerd, and I shop at Best Busy. Mostly because I can get a great Service Plan. Don't feel bad if you haven't heard of it, I think you have to be someone they really like for them to mention it to you! Also, they have this wonderful group called Geek Squad that will set up your computer for you! I can't begin to tell you how much time that has saved for me, so I can do Real Nerd stuff.

    90. Re:Idle computer resources by Zerth · · Score: 1

      The gals in the call center love me in winter because their side of the building runs colder then where the thermostat is. I got maintainance to install a blower over my drop ceiling that pushes all the heat from my racks towards them.

    91. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a green admin/sys engineer i'm curious, do you feel the same about reboots (like for certain application installations etc) where as i understand it, the PSU is still delivering voltage the whole time?

    92. Re:Idle computer resources by celle · · Score: 1

      This is also about 10 year old computers when power management was in its infancy and often didn't work. Processors used only a few watts at 100% utilization and throttling was unstable or didn't exist. The board already told him not to turn the computers off so the money was being spent anyway, better to use it for something than just warming the rooms. The whole thing smells of political gaming.

    93. Re:Idle computer resources by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Niesluchowski is claiming he had permission to run the SETI@Home 3 superintendents ago, 2 superintendents ago when he was informed that SETI@Home might be a problem, he installed a "group policy object" or GPO on the computers to disable SETI; which was inadvertently disabled or deleted. Seems that some whiteboard program was having trouble do to the computers going into screensaver or standby when inactive.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    94. Re:Idle computer resources by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      LMAO This comment deserves to go into the /. Hall of Fame for sure. [golf claps]

    95. Re:Idle computer resources by conureman · · Score: 1

      Higley is in the Phoenix Valley in Arizona. In my limited experience that is the hottest part of the state. There could well be a hotter area, they get a surprising amount of weather blowing in from the Sea of Cortez. It aint Flagstaff, a skinflint could probably live there without any heat at all.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    96. Re:Idle computer resources by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      I got in the habit of running my computer 24/7 back in the day of the Apple ][, with its notoriously weak power switch. I have kept with that habit since. The computer is on unless I'm going to be gone for over 24 hours or a thunderstorm comes visiting (in which case it is not only off, but entirely disconnected from power and networks).

      In my experience, if a new computer or component does not fail in the first 90 days of use, it is very unlikely to fail in the next 5 years, provided that

      • the power source is properly conditioned. Meaning a UPS with both surge protection and brownout protection.
      • the thermal environment is kept stable. Meaning that the computer is kept in operation 24/7, so that all components stay within their temperature specifications at all times.
      • the dust is blown out of it every so often.

      My experience includes a lot of tech support in VAR and site manager roles as well as running my own custom programming and web development services.

      Back in the day when a TRaSh-80 came into the shop for repair, the first thing we did was pop the cover and put thumb pressure on each chip until we heard it scrunch back into its socket. That often was all the repair that was needed. Thermal chip creep is not a problem today, but the circuitry that takes the current from the 20 Ga wires down to the nanoscale feeds on the silicon itself is still susceptible to fractures from thermal contraction/expansion cycles. It is very rare any more for a component to fail by letting out its magic smoke; any more most failures are because some part of the component is no longer getting any juice. It doesn't burn up; it has gone frigid.

      --
      Will
    97. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the low end of computers, you're right. You won't save money but you'll get a better machine. For the higher end (computer able to play games) you'll definitely save money over pre-built computers from retail (Or spend the same and get something much faster). Either way the biggest advantage is getting to pick out a mother board that's not a piece of crap and a power supply thats more than 300W.

    98. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thermal cycling and power surge are the dangers. IANAEE, but it seems like those don't occur on a hot reboot.

    99. Re:Idle computer resources by leptons · · Score: 1

      No, wrong. Fake nerds buy apple or dell. Real nerds do in fact build their own machines, with specs that are specific to their needs. Try getting this off-the-shelf: http://www.ranker.com/list/how-to-build-a-kick-ass-workstation-for-_5200-_april-2008_/damien

    100. Re:Idle computer resources by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      He is (was) the "technology" supervisor, not the "power and utilities" supervisor.

      --
      $ make available
    101. Re:Idle computer resources by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Obviously you failed electronics as your understanding of how it works is flawed.
      With modern cpu's and software, power consumption does rise with the work performed, sometimes by an order of magnitude, but somewhat hidden by the energy the psu wastes when not running at its highest efficiency loading, which might well be at its full nameplate delivery, so while the motherboard may be only using 10% of its peak at idling loads, the more of less fixed losses in the psu, and the hard drives still spinning will narrow that gap and make it look like the cpu is still using 30-40%.

      That said, I discontinued boinc on my machines because boinc think it needs the system priority full time. The boinc people are all windows fans and could not understand why it was unusable on linux. The old seti clients all ran at minimum priority and I was never aware they were working in the background even when running it on my amiga's at the time. I was once in the top 5000 on the seti production list, but when they converted to boinc, they did two unforgivable things:

      1. It took the machine away from me, using 99% of the cpu, to the point I couldn't even type an email reply at my elderly hunt & peck speeds.

      2. About 2-3 months later, they threw away everyones rankings. I had been fixing boinc to control the running priority till then. That was the last straw, so it got removed.

      I looked at folding@home for about 2 hours, but once again the linux version took my machine away from me. So neither has been installed for several years now.

      Has the situation changed so they are once again friendly to the user who would like to think his 24/7 machines might be doing something useful while I'm sawing logs?

      --
      Cheers, Gene

    102. Re:Idle computer resources by war4peace · · Score: 1

      No, I'm 30, smartass, but I don't live in the country where all dreams come true. And I only counted PCs. But hey, feel free to make fun of me for not being able to buy a computer until like 12 years ago. I hope you're happy now.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    103. Re:Idle computer resources by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 1

      https://www.cpushare.com/wiki/cpushare/ElectricityCost

      I ran the numbers once myself. It does not cost a significant amount more to run the CPU at 100 pct versus idling the computer.

    104. Re:Idle computer resources by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      With 5000 machines in the district they are probably replacing one or more fans per day even if they don't run SETI@home.

    105. Re:Idle computer resources by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Once you've picked the parts, the actual assembly is usually very straightforward. Plug cable into the only thing it fits in and stuff like that. The only tricky bit is fitting the cpu heat sink.

      I hear you on the "balance" issue. I wish there was a utility you could run to see where your bottlenecks are really occurring. No point in upgrading the CPU if the reason your game is all framey is insufficient RAM. Similarly, no point in bumping up the ghz if it's wasting cycles waiting on L2 cache misses.

      But you still don't save anything. At least not over the classes of machines you'll find on the shelves at Best Buy. The website, strangely, does not seem to have the same deals.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    106. Re:Idle computer resources by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Not 900 Mhz, But the CPU is just called the Celeron 900, it runs at 2.2 Ghz and has speeds slightly better than Intel's Atom CPU

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    107. Re:Idle computer resources by DoninIN · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, why isn't the /. community calling for his head for being a windows administrator anyway? If he'd have talked the folks on the board into switching the entire network and all of their computers over to OSS he would have been doing a great service to his community, and he could have used the boinc linux client and taken care of everything seamlesssly and automagically.

    108. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't know where your getting your cases.

      my antec case is gorgeous. Stainless steel for the win. Hell, cooler master and shuttle cases are beauties as well. pay up the extra 15 dollars and you get a case to be proud of.

    109. Re:Idle computer resources by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      You can order from HP or Dell and get the components you want without building from scratch. Most nerds are going to at least customize a base system to get the better video card and more ram, period. I know of NO real programmer or anyone that truly uses a computer for a living, who just marches off and buys a bone stock box. Maybe someone's mom, for an email machine, but anyone with any brains about computing will always pick at least some of the components.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    110. Re:Idle computer resources by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure that schools buy machines that old, but I've seen plenty that clearly hang onto their systems that long / as long as they possibly can, moving them down the chain as they age and newer models trickle in. It doesn't take a lot of resources for a 5th grader to punch "declaration of independence" into a search engine.

    111. Re:Idle computer resources by mxh83 · · Score: 1

      That's BS, There's no commercial processor that can consume 270W on load.

    112. Re:Idle computer resources by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      SETI can use your graphics card as well...

      The GP didn't say anything about Seti, they said when the CPU goes to 100%. Nothing mentioned about the GPU.

    113. Re:Idle computer resources by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      I bought my 9XXX series NVIDIA for the same reasons. I'm happy to hear that there are others that consider this when choosing PC computer parts.

    114. Re:Idle computer resources by Ollabelle · · Score: 1

      You're fine. Some people always jump at comparisons they beat.

      --
      Ibid.
    115. Re:Idle computer resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Resistance heat converts electrical energy to heat energy.

      Heat pumps, on the other hand, use electrical energy to move heat absorbed from the outdoors into the conditioned space. This absorbed heat is stored via heated vapor/liquid refrigerant, then extracted through the latent heat transfer of state change (eg. rejecting heat at the refrigerant changes from a vapor to liquid)

    116. Re:Idle computer resources by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. When was the last time anyone wire-wrapped a keyboard?

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    117. Re:Idle computer resources by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's obvious that failures are more likely to show up when you turn the computer on, as that's when it's hardest on the components. But it doesn't follow that it's best to leave the computer on all the time, if the additional wear and tear on the components from leaving it on outweigh the wear and tear from powering it on. To use a car analogy, starting the engine of a car is hard on it, but I doubt you would leave your car running 24/7 even if the fuel was free.

      Besides, I think of powering the computer on as a bit of a stress test that can highlight when something is starting to get marginal before it completely fails. I've never lost data on a harddisk in a computer that I regularly turn off, as it will give signs of impending failure when I turn the computer on long before it finally quits. However, when a harddrive goes out on a computer that's left on all the time it tends to be completely gone by the time I've realized something is wrong with it.

    118. Re:Idle computer resources by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've found the most likely components to fail on a computer are mechanical parts like the fans and drives, and the electrolytic capacitors - things that wear out faster the more the computer is left on. While it's true that thermal cycling will shorten the life of components like the CPU, chipset, and graphics cards I've found that those components are so reliable it's not an issue.

    119. Re:Idle computer resources by Leebert · · Score: 1

      Nope, but that *is* when you find out that the patch or configuration change you made some time ago broke the system's ability to boot. :)

  2. Law of unintended consquences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who knew leaving a bank of computers on 24/7 costs money?

    1. Re:Law of unintended consquences. by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who knew leaving a bank of computers on 24/7 costs money?

      Answer: The school administrators, who turned down a previous IT request to turn the machines off when not in use and impliment a power management policy some years prior to this incident.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Law of unintended consquences. by Xacid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it's anything like the schools I've been to then there's a LOT of wasted potential in those machines - they're always on ANYWAY.

      I don't see how this was a firing matter unless there's more to the story than we're getting. An educational institution SHOULD be supportive of research. Granted I wouldn't have used Seti - something like Boinc has served me well in the past allowing for control over the projects I want my CPU time to go to - including seti.

    3. Re:Law of unintended consquences. by the+old+rang · · Score: 1

      Quote:

      "Who knew leaving a bank of computers on 24/7 costs money?"

      Obviously, the following types, who more than likely have the password 'PASSWORD' on their systems (or something like a sticky note with the password on it...pasted to monitor)

      1) As noted, the school admin.
      2) As not noted, the city and state DOE, who had not set mandatory policies of shutting down non-essential/non-monitored systems.
      3) As not noted, the nim-null reporter with glorious hatred for such projects as SETI, and completely in the dark about computers, computer security, computer SOPs of any depth, and with no real journalistic/reporter understanding of ethics, demonstrated by not having contacted SETI, to ask for the other side of the story. But, 90% of reporters are at least this bad (Ask ABC, NBC, CBS and BBC about how long they knew about what is now called 'CLIMATE GATE' before their am/pm news shows did??).
      4) More than computer ignorant and journalism/reporting ethics editor. Any qualified editor (of which there are fewer every day, knows to have a 'stop the presses cub reporters' work checked, before going to press, so to speak.

    4. Re:Law of unintended consquences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can easily set amount of processor to use or even suspend the project with a few point and clicks. It wouldn't take long to actually deinstall the seti porgram. This was really silly to fire him over this. A repremand and make the correction (removial of seti) on his personal time would have been a reasonable remedy.

  3. Intelligent Life by DaMP12000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess they're too busy allocating all their resources trying to find intelligent life in their class rooms...

    1. Re:Intelligent Life by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 3, Funny

      There *is* intelligent life in the classrooms.......but apparently not in the staff lounge.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:Intelligent Life by selven · · Score: 2, Funny

      The people in the staff lounge are squeezing both intelligence and life out of the others pretty well.

    3. Re:Intelligent Life by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      You presume facts not in evidence. Might want to visit some of those classrooms first.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:Intelligent Life by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously implying that you are the only one here who's been to a classroom?

    5. Re:Intelligent Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could mod you up one for funny. This "decision" was made at the district level not by committee in a break lounge. Some self rightous pious clown belched out this termination decision. Rather than have the school stand up and say this could and should be a District wide project, the Personnel Moron In Charge went on a holy crusade.

    6. Re:Intelligent Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone apparently hasn't opened a staff lounge refrigerator...

    7. Re:Intelligent Life by mpe · · Score: 1

      I guess they're too busy allocating all their resources trying to find intelligent life in their class rooms...

      If they don't find any fairly quickly that dosn't give much hope for the faculty and students.

    8. Re:Intelligent Life by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Just challenging one /.'r to a visit.

      Are you seriously implying that I am that clueless?

      You would be mistaken.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    9. Re:Intelligent Life by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "I wish I could mod you up one for funny. This "decision" was made at the district level not by committee in a break lounge. Some self rightous pious clown belched out this termination decision. Rather than have the school stand up and say this could and should be a Dsistrict wide project, the Personnel Moron In Charge went on a holy crusade."

      Can I mode you up/down for 'Clueless'?

      I've done work for many school districts that would have done the same thing. Indeed, I believe that looking further into this, you would find that there was pre-existing policy against such a thing; that is, installing unapproved software.

      Reading some recent reports on school personnel being dismissed for accidental downloads of objectionable material, malware infections, etc., I'm a little surprised you would seem to be taking the side of a school staffer installing ANYTHING not necessary.

      It's not that SETI isn't a worthwhile project. It may or may not be, I'll reserve judgment on that. It's that the software was not approved, and installing it was inappropriate. He paid the price. I'm beginning to think most of those who are taking his side just don't get it.

      One more reason I don't much like working for politically controlled organizations. Which does, I know, rule out a lot of work. It's ok. There's lots more.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  4. Ignorance in the comments from the Superintendent by Trekologer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From TFA: '"Unfortunately it says a lot about people who are theoretically educating our children," said Dave Farber, distinguished career professor of computer science and public policy in the school of computer science at Carnegie Mellon.'

    It seems that the folks who are in charge of education become further and further detached from technological advancement as time goes on. These are the same individuals who are given access to technology for use in the classrooms and barely use it for more than a glorified typewriter. Add to that those who refuse to utilize the technology either out of ignorance (don't know how to use it) or fear (refuse to know how to use it), you have a large number of classrooms with expensive space heaters.

  5. where does water comer from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cloud computing fails to win.

  6. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's no ignorance in her remarks, she knows exactly what she is doing. I've worked at a school district in Arizona for the past 5 years and what is happening here is typical. A new superintendent comes in and wants to fill all the high paying jobs with cronies. This guy just didn't leave quietly so they trashed his reputation (they do that all the time). Arizona school districts are some of the most corrupt organizations that i've ever dealt with. BTW don't feel too sorry for him, he more than likely got his job the same way, its the way things are done here.

  7. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sad truth will continue to occur until intelligent, capable people begin to devote their lives toward the education of our children. Unless that happens, the majority of our public educators will forever be the people who couldn't pass math because they weren't able to figure out their calculator.

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  8. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by selven · · Score: 1

    people who couldn't pass math because they weren't able to figure out their calculator.

    Or, alternatively, people who were given a calculator way too early and thus couldn't pass math because without one they couldn't say what 7*9 is.

  9. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW don't feel too sorry for him, he more than likely got his job the same way, its the way things are done here.

    Wow! Nice drive-by innuendo!

  10. Ignorance and stupidity abound... by kj_kabaje · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not only does the lady who fired the guy demonstrate how ignorant she is, the reporters demonstrate astounding ignorance too: http://www.fox5vegas.com/video/21785181/index.html

    How the fsck do people not know about this program or not consider it research? My wife (not a technically adept person) has run this program for years and in schools, too. Ask the guy to uninstall it if it costs to much in a recession (he had approval of the previous administration to run it though!). Don't fire him because you're stupid.

    1. Re:Ignorance and stupidity abound... by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Don't fire him because you're stupid."

      Agreed. Have they thought how much it'll cost to replace him? He's been there 10+ years, he built the network they're on, he knows everything there is to know about the system, how do you replace that? They're probably going to hire whoever pretends to know what they're doing the most and get nothing done. How do you know the next guy won't do something far worse? This is a witch hunt that will end up costing the school district hundreds of thousands of dollars and a lot of embarrassment.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    2. Re:Ignorance and stupidity abound... by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It might actually be cheaper to replace him, given how pay scales work in some school districts. In downturns, some schools look for any excuse to fire teachers who have been around the longest, because they cost the most money. Then they can hire a new teacher for a lot cheaper.

      The entire hiring and firing for teachers and school employees is extremely messed up, at least in California. According to some of the comments in this story, it's just as bad in Arizona.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:Ignorance and stupidity abound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he had already been demoted from his position as IT Director for the district so the lady who fired him could give that position to a relative.

    4. Re:Ignorance and stupidity abound... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      " schools look for any excuse to fire teachers who have been around the longest, because they cost the most money. Then they can hire a new teacher for a lot cheaper."

      Why would they take advice from a bankrupt company?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  11. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Trekologer · · Score: 1

    "There's no ignorance in her remarks, she knows exactly what she is doing."

    I'm not too sure about that. All of the quotes sound like they came from an empty shirt who thinks she knows everything just because she has some paper and got to where she was not by achievement but who she knows. Similar to all the CxO's who run companies into the ground, escape with the golden parachute then land another cushy job to do the same thing over again.

  12. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like you've got something to hide. Did you let the children out of your basement yet?

  13. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ( Cant be assed to login ) Tbh, They would get better teachers if they paid more.. However this isnt going to happen, So out children will continue to be taught stupid things by stupid people .
    I worry what is being taught in science, maths etc.. ( Parts that i dont understand nor care about ) however if they get I.T wrong. What other shit are they getting wrong?

  14. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Memorizing a 10x10 table is certainly an indicator of intelligence. After all, it requires a lot of brain power to memorize 7*9. Can you tell me what 17x16 is?

  15. Turning a bad thing into a good thing... by heidaro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The school should take pride in assisting with research and promote itself on the idea that it is the leading school in searching for alien life on other planets.

    1. Re:Turning a bad thing into a good thing... by mok000 · · Score: 1

      I agree. The school could have spun it around and used this to promote science teaching. There's a great deal of interesting science in the SETI project, (although I don't believe they will ever find an signals from distant civilizations.) "Our school is searching for E.T.!" The kids would have loved that.

  16. Yeah by teknosapien · · Score: 1

    I want my kid to go here where the bleeding edge is observed "/end sarcasm" Seriously ? science is ban at this school?

    --
    no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
  17. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Memorizing a 10x10 table is certainly an indicator of intelligence. After all, it requires a lot of brain power to memorize 7*9. Can you tell me what 17x16 is?

    Sure. Since 2 + 2 = 22 then 17 x 16 = 1716.

  18. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by godrik · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you tell me what 17x16 is?

    It's a multiplication, sir!

  19. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by brusk · · Score: 1

    What would the product of such an educational system look like?

    --
    .sig withheld by request
  20. Devil's advocate by brusk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think SETI@home is great and all, but it sounds like the school board didn't authorize this person to install the software on the machines in question. Whatever the pros and cons are in the abstract, he shouldn't have unilaterally decided to do this. It does cost money to run CPUs at 100% (the SETI@home FAQ estimates over $60 a year) and if there were thousands of machines running it, as there apparently were, that's hundreds of thousands of dollars in the long run. Maybe the school district wants to spend its money on that, but it should be decided by the board, not by one employee.

    --
    .sig withheld by request
    1. Re:Devil's advocate by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think SETI@home is great and all, but it sounds like the school board didn't authorize this person to install the software on the machines in question.

      The man was not some local school tech with a screwdiver or rogue physics teacher - he was the technology supervisor for the school district. If minutia like what software to run is something that the school board must micro-manage, then his job is a no-op. So, either the board is seriously dysfunctional to the point of needing to be disbanded and reorganized with brand new people, or he had plenty of authority to decide all on his own.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Devil's advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Micromanage? Please.

      In what way does SETI@Home advance the school district's IT infrastructure? In what way is the software reasonably related to any job function performed by the IT administrators?

      They aren't his computers. His discretion to install software is still bound by the legitimate scope of his employment. Being in control of the system and selecting software still has that missing ingredient of the software having a legitimate purpose in the first place. It's no more proper than installing gaming software on the computers to throw LAN parties for him and his buddies at night.

      It takes a deluded malcontent to think that he had unilateral authority to use thousands of computers for a personal project. Slashdot being the motherlode of deluded malcontents, though, perhaps I should not be surprised.

    3. Re:Devil's advocate by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      but it should be decided by the board, not by one employee.

      Ah yes, software requirements dictated by a board of computer illiterates that were elected into office by other computer illiterates. I agree that software selection should follow a policy. However, the school board should not be making those decisions. Though their input should be considered.

      A good example: Linux is banned in our local school district. Why, because the school board mandated that all computers in the district run Norton Antivirus. How was this decided? A Best Buy salesman told a school board member that all of their computers come preinstalled with a three-month subscription to Norton Antivirus and that all computers need this protection. Thus it was mandated that all school computers specifically have Norton installed.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    4. Re:Devil's advocate by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot being the motherlode of deluded malcontents, though, perhaps I should not be surprised.

      Slashdot being the motherload of randian ubermen living in their mom's basements with fascist delusions of grandeur, though, perhaps I should not be surprised at your ridiculously authoritarian framing of the issue.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Devil's advocate by apoc.famine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      seriously dysfunctional to the point of needing to be disbanded and reorganized with brand new people

      This. School boards are little fiefdoms, filled with people who desperately want to be important. The school board for the school I worked for was just like this. There was a conference that some students were going to go to. The teacher for the subject couldn't make it, but since it was on a saturday, and not a contract work day or event, it wasn't a big deal. The school board disagreed, and ordered him to write a letter of apology to the students who went. Yes, he had to apologize for not doing something he wasn't required to do.
       
      School boards LOVE to micromanage. They mandated a specific essay format for my district at one point. All essays, for all subjects, had to be in one format. Why? To make sure kids knew what to expect for writing projects. It would lead to success!
       
      We had issues with one board member who ran a conservation program. He continuously hounded the science teachers to bring their kids on field trips to his conservation area. Why? He needed the free labor to plant trees and do work. Of course, "it's a valuable educational resource that you're not taking advantage of" was the motto.
       
      Never underestimate the amount of dysfunctional, petty, micromanaging idiots that can get on a school board.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  21. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My school was built for the 1997-1998 school yeah. I attended it from 98-02. We had bran new computers in almost EVERY classroom, complete with 20 port hubs and ethernet cable drops in every classroom

    The only time I touched the computers in my entire 4 years in high school, was for my typing classes, and my 1 engineering class.

    Meanwhile, the English classrooms computers sat there and were vandalized and stolen.

    I got a pair of speakers, thanks to the tax payers in Florida. Thank you, tax payers.

    All of this because some stupid politician said something to the voters about "computers in every classroom" and the voters, like ignorant lapdogs, went along with it. The budget HAD to be huge for that school, and it was all an incredible fraud and waste.

    Hey, least I got some speakers, and my friends got some hubs...at least we put them to use, instead of letting them collect dust in an English/Math/Science classroom.

  22. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Arizona school districts are some of the most corrupt organizations that i've ever dealt with.

    I assure you that Arizona doesn't have a monopoly on school corruption.

    Want to hear an example of how it works in my state? There's quasi-state agencies called 'Boards of Cooperative Educational Services' (BOCES) that provide various services to the school districts that join. The theory is that shared services between districts will offer cost savings. Good theory, but it comes with a few catches. Once a district joins BOCES they can't ever leave and must continue to pay their membership dues even if they elect not to use any of the services offered.

    I used to work for a company that was contracted with two local districts to supply internet services, workstations and servers. We were always able to beat BOCES by a fair margin when the annual bids rolled around. Then New York State changed the law so that the school districts couldn't receive matching funds from the state unless they went with BOCES, even if the overall cost of doing so was higher.

    The internet services that we were offering were cheaper, provided more bandwidth and were eligible for a large amount of Federal funding out of the universal service fund. The internet services offered by BOCES were more expensive, provided half the bandwidth and weren't eligible for Federal funding. But the districts had to choose them anyway, because they were "cheaper" (due to the state matching funds granted exclusively to BOCES) and the fact that they were wasting their contribution dues to BOCES if it didn't use their services.

    In effect, my state is subsidizing a monopoly to do a worse job for more money. In the end almost everybody loses -- the school districts, the taxpayers and the private enterprises that could offer a superior product but find themselves shut out of the market. The only winners are the employees of BOCES. Our local one happens to be staffed with ex-politicians at the administrative level and their cronies at the lower levels. Nice, isn't it?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  23. The thing I always liked about SETI by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It isn't so much the application to find E.T. that astounds me, its the use of a distributed networking. I don't follow SETI, but I assume the power they have in distributed computing is something like or above a Super Computer. The students can learn about distributed computing, and maybe be the guy who builds the next big network. I mean, imagine a commercial system that pays for processing. So you turn your computer and get paid by the team. The team in turn gets paid by scientists with very difficult problems and need distributed computing.

    Don't focus on it being "searching for aliens", focus on it being "distributed computing".

    1. Re:The thing I always liked about SETI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops

    2. Re:The thing I always liked about SETI by jonnythan · · Score: 3, Informative

      And the first time any administrator champions his school's or school system's use of distributed computing, his boss (school board, taxpayers) will say:

      "Great! Good for us. Now, exactly how much are we spending on this, who is overseeing it, who authorized it, and where are these funds being allocated in the budget?"

      And that administrator will not have any answers because no one authorized it and they're dead-ass broke. Then someone would get fired. They can't afford to spend some unknown amount of money on supporting SETI.

    3. Re:The thing I always liked about SETI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      presumably, thats what the funds are for. obviously i dont need to convince YOU but in this world it is critically important that the up and coming generations have not just a fundamental basic understanding of current technology but they should be able to look at what exists from a masterful perspective so that they can in turn reason "how can we make this better?" with buzzwords like crowdsourcing, the cloud and social networking becoming household terms we will need to find better ways to implement our current systems as well as find entirely new systems, especially when you combine it with the other buzzwords such as green, and sustainability. I love what we can do between the transistor and "the beauty of the baud" but just like car enthusiast are waking up to realize, we cant go on doing things the same way forever. beyond causing pollution, computers use large amounts of rare minerals. and supercomupters are horridly inefficient. creating tons of heat and putting large demands on power grids. computer education is very important. it used to be taht if you could educate somebody to be a computer user that was good enough, but thats like sticking a 16 year old in a car and saying this is the whee, thats the gas and the other one is the brake, have fun.

  24. If it cost money for the institution they should b by Dr.+Knowfun · · Score: 1

    If it cost money for the institution they should be able to write off the cost as a donation to SETI@home. Just sayin, if its about money the SETI@home guys could make the offer and make this a win/win instead of more of the usual zero sum game we usually see. Dr. Knowfun "The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat." --Confucius

  25. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, there's no wikipedia article on 17x16. So i guess the answer then is no... Well played, sir.

  26. Aren't we missing the point? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Aren't we missing the point by ruling entirely on accounting grounds? Aren't educational establishments supposed to be doing research, as a part of their fundamental reason for being? I want to know whether there's life out there. I want a cure for cancer.

    Yes, I know, and you want a pony. But we're better than that, aren't we? We have to be.

    Maybe we should start by teaching a bit of history, starting with the Reformation and the Rennaisence.

    We have had personal computers and the internet for about a decade now. A decade. We have utterly no clue how that's going to affect civilisation in the future. But do we want to look back and say "Yes, for the longest time there we could have had it all, but nobody wanted it" ?

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Aren't we missing the point? by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 1

      .

      Yes, I know, and you want a pony. But we're better than that, aren't we? We have to be.

      Maybe we should start by teaching a bit of history, starting with the Reformation and the Rennaisence.

      How is history better than a pony?

    2. Re:Aren't we missing the point? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Aren't educational establishments supposed to be doing research, as a part of their fundamental reason for being?

      The computers were in schools, not educational establishments. Their job is to keep kids out of the way so their parents can go to work.

    3. Re:Aren't we missing the point? by hapalibashi · · Score: 1

      "A decade"? Is that when Al Gore invented it?

    4. Re:Aren't we missing the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computers were in schools, not educational establishments. Their job is to keep kids out of the way so their parents can go to work.

      Wrong. Schools have always been meant as training grounds for mindless, soulless mine, factory and office workers. The daycare aspect was merely a consequence beneficial to some parents.

    5. Re:Aren't we missing the point? by lennier · · Score: 1

      "How is history better than a pony?"

      History doesn't leave big dirty messes behind it... ... wait, strike that, reverse it.

      A pony IS better than history! Because you can clean up after it with just ONE shovel.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    6. Re:Aren't we missing the point? by lennier · · Score: 1

      ""A decade"? Is that when Al Gore invented it?"

      No, silly, that's when Google invented the Web. Try to keep up.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  27. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Itninja · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like your state needs to look into something that Washington and Oregon (and perhaps other states) use. We call them Educational Service Districts (ESD's) and they operate in a highly entrepreneurial fashion. If a district does not like the service and/or price they are getting from one ESD, they are free "join" another ESD even if it is hundreds of miles away. They would still be in their original ESD's legislative area (determined by geography), but are not bound by their prices or policies.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  28. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by jschen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    17x16? That's easy. Any self-respecting member of /. should know that 16x16 = 256. Therefore, 17x16 = 256 + 16 = 272.

  29. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 1

    7*9 was the Borg on Star Trek

  30. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 1

    17x16 is likely a multiswitch, according to Google

  31. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Starlon · · Score: 1

    Can you tell me what 17x16 is?

    Let me plug that into my computer here. *crunch crunch* Ah here's the answer: 42.

    --
    Health Freedom is almost as popular as Freedom itself.
  32. me too response, welcome to the real world by johncandale · · Score: 1
    there are lots of reasons you can't use company/school equipment for non company tasks besides money. Anyone who's had a real job would know this. You always want to reduce you attack surface, or risk. If it's not part of your/the companies job you don't do it. They don't have time to review every software project for legal concerns, and why should they bother even one hour of lawyer time on it anyways? Even if it's painfully clear there is no legal concern, it doesn't matter, the law can be tricky, and the default answer is always to restrict. Man have people gotten fat and soft! I know of someone that got fired back whenever for using the copier to copy a 10 page personal document. But you say, 'thats like less then 2 pennies worth of ink and paper!' You think it matters? Also there is the assumption that if you did this, what else have you copied or will copy? You know they audit the copies mileage meter on copiers, if the office next to yours has 10% less copies in the same time frame, they are going to ask you why and to cut your copying.

    Do not, -do -not tell me the SETI did not cost the school money in electricity , whether it was $100, or $100,000. Any tech person could tell you it did. If just one, just one PSU or part burned out, so much the worse. "Well I didn't know that would happen" boss "well you shouldn't have been doing it in the first place". Grow up people. Running a business is hard, and the boss sees this and goes "wtf, your playing with my money" 'My Money'. A school is if anything worse because it's public funds.

    1. Re:me too response, welcome to the real world by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      "A school is if anything worse because it's public funds."

      If it is a K-12 institution, then yes, they are very strict on this. If it is a university, many wouldn't care and burn money like crazy. There are certain government research grants for universities that require you to deplete them in a certain period of time or you will lose the remaining funds.

  33. Wow by awowwalton · · Score: 0, Troll

    I heard its costing more than a million dollars to fix everything. How many computers did they have? thats a ton of money. http://www.memoryfoamslipper.com/

  34. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sad truth will continue to occur until intelligent, capable people begin to devote their lives toward the education of our children. Unless that happens, the majority of our public educators will forever be the people who couldn't pass math because they weren't able to figure out their calculator.

    Bullshit, my wife is a teacher here in NC. Been teaching for 7 years now and she makes under 35k a year and spends 60+ hours a week at school. She loves teaching but has had to go back to graduate school in order to escape the bullshit pay, no planing period, no assistant and the ridicules paper work. Why don't you go become a fucking teacher and take care of 20 to 30 children with little to no help from anyone for less than what you could make at Wendy's flipping burgers...

    You want good teachers? Fucking pay them. Not the text book companies or all the other leeches.. Pay the fucking teachers.

  35. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

    Let me plug that into my computer here. *crunch crunch* Ah here's the answer: 42.

    Nobody writes jokes in base 230.

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  36. Why say more? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Q. Do I need permission from my employer to run SETI@home on computers at work?

    A. Yes! Of course! We've been saying that for 10 years, and despite what some bloggers have said, Niesluchowski wasn't the first person to lose his job over this. The first time was many years ago.

    This should have been the beginning and end of the Q&A. Regardless of the relative merits of SETI@Home or what it does or doesn't do to a computer or network, the bottom line is pretty simple: Install unauthorized software on computers that aren't yours and you get spanked.

    1. Re:Why say more? by azrael29a · · Score: 1

      It's even funnier if you know Polish or other slavic languages. Niesluchowski seems to be a Polish surname and it can be translated as "not-hearing" or "not-listening" :D ("nie" = no, "sluch" = hearing). So it's no surprise that he didn't care about what SETI FAQs say. Disclaimer: IAAP (I Am a Pole) :)

    2. Re:Why say more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the installation was authorized by the previous administration .... and acorrding to the article

      Niesluchowski argues that he had installed firewalls, and ,when alerted about SETI, installed a "group policy object" or GPO on the computers to disable SETI.

    3. Re:Why say more? by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Q. Do I need permission from my employer to run SETI@home on computers at work?
      A. Yes! Of course! We've been saying that for 10 years, and despite what some bloggers have said, Niesluchowski wasn't the first person to lose his job over this. The first time was many years ago.

      This should have been the beginning and end of the Q&A. Regardless of the relative merits of SETI@Home or what it does or doesn't do to a computer or network, the bottom line is pretty simple: Install unauthorized software on computers that aren't yours and you get spanked.

      Well, duh. Of course in this case the person who loaded the software on the computers is also the person who decides which software is authorized.

      --
      Will
    4. Re:Why say more? by slcdb · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

      So this talk of police investigations and possible criminal charges is ridiculous. If his activities caused as large an increase in electricity costs as the superintendent implies they had, then you'd think that at some point during the 10 years he was running SETI@Home that someone from the district's accounting department would have started wondering why their electric bills suddenly increased for seemingly no reason. I call bullshit.

      At best, they could fire him (if he hadn't already resigned) for his making poor "business" decisions (in their view). But they certainly can't claim this software was "unauthorized", and therefore a criminal violation, when he is the guy who *they* appointed to make those decisions on behalf of the district.

      You could just as easily argue that letting the CPUs, that they *paid good money for*, sit idle 75% of the time is a waste of resources that could otherwise be put to good use. No doubt, most people who run SETI@Home probably have used this, in part, as rationalization for their participation in the program. So, from a different point of view, his decision to maximize the utilization of the district's computing facilities was a good one.

      The whole reaction to it reeks of some kind of grudge against the guy.

      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
    5. Re:Why say more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This issue is not an open and close case. It really shows how much ignorance there is regarding the technology challenges in schools.

      Far too often teachers have no say in what the IT staff do to their computers. This guy sounds like he he put his needs above those of the teachers and students.

      I've taught 6 years and my IT department had no checks and balances, no audit, no technology committee. My IT staff refused to work with many staff who had environmental concerns and proposed tools to turn off computers after 4pm if not in use.

      Teacher's needs are often denied with myths. Look at this Dave Farber myth, that you harm your computer by turning it off at night, much like a lightbulb.

      How can a freak spreading this myth possibly have a paid job at Carnegie Mellon? WTF.

      Dave Farber, distinguished career professor of computer science and public policy in the school of computer science at Carnegie Mellon.

      quote
      "Most advice given on computers nowadays is don't power them down," Farber said. Wear and tear on electronics is greater when they heat up and cool down, as they do when a computer powers on and off, he said.

      I'm thinking I need to call this guy to see if the press quoted him properly, then call the department head. FYI Computers are not made of the tungsten in old light bulbs.

  37. Re:If it cost money for the institution they shoul by brusk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A public school can't "write off" an expense. Only a private company or individual can write something off--i.e., count it toward a tax deduction. For the school board, the money comes out of tax revenues.

    --
    .sig withheld by request
  38. Re:If it cost money for the institution they shoul by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

    "Writing off" an expense is only a relevant concept if you are a tax paying institution, which public schools are not. The extra electricity for this is a pure out of pocket expense for the school, however minor.

    On my computer, which idles at 130 watts, running seti@home increases power draw to ~180 watts, according to the lil kill-a-watt meter I got from Think Geek. I have a quad core intel 9450 ( i think). I can't imagine the school computers are going to be any worse than that. So, 50 watts an hour, say 20 hours a day, =~ 1 kW/day. I don't know what arizona power rates are, lets assume 12 cents/kWh. That means this would cost around $43/year. If he installed to a couple of thousand computers, that's real money.

    It would be interesting to know what proportion of the power bill we are discussing here. This could be a rounding error in comparison to the AC bills.

    --
    I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
  39. You forgot the video card. by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

    Wow that sounds like some cheap ass shit components there. I'm not looking for no el cheapo parts for my computer, I want to make sure this thing is gonna run good and for awhile, damn the prices!!

    Btw how are you going to play any decent games on your on-board video? Picture editing, video editing, surfing the web, watching hi-def videos, and so on and so forth. Good luck with that one Mr. Tightwad.

    --
    Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    1. Re:You forgot the video card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have a 1 ghz Pentium M that surfs the web just as good as whatever shrine to video games you have on your desk. Why is it that Slashdot is so over run with a bunch of know nothings anymore?

  40. Still waiting by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    I am yet still waiting to hear a response from the EFF on this matter.

  41. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sad truth will continue to occur until intelligent, capable people begin to devote their lives toward the education of our children.

    She loves teaching but has had to go back to graduate school in order to escape the bullshit pay... You want good teachers? Fucking pay them.

    My impression is that, even if you go back to grad school, you're still not going to be paid anywhere near what you'd get paid if you went and got a job in industry with that same masters or PhD. As long as our society expects bright people to suck it up if they want to teach, we're not going to get as many of them to teach as we'd like.

    Of course, I still don't understand why we require teachers to have a bachelors or masters degree to teach grade school, or why schools need so damn many administrators and experts to "optimize" the teaching process.

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
  42. Re:Black Friday by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1
    --
    Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
  43. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    Can you tell me what 17x16 is?

    Imperial or SI?

  44. Your CPU at 100% isn't SETI@home at 100% by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Anyone who saw this and said "OOH. Mod this informative!" needs to get themselves an Intel datasheet sometime and look at it. The CPU couldn't possibly sink anywhere near 450 Watts of power. Most likely when ones "CPU is at 100%" it is also rendering graphics and accessing the hard disk because the applications using the CPU are also using those devices, which do sink lots of power. These things don't happen with SETI@home. It loads into memory and accesses the net via the NIC. Welcome to the real "world of reality".

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  45. I wonder... by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the response would have been as negative if he was running something less "fringe" like Folding@home.

  46. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    My impression is that, even if you go back to grad school, you're still not going to be paid anywhere near what you'd get paid if you went and got a job in industry with that same masters or PhD.

    She has a degree in Psychology as well as her K-6 teaching license and national board certification. She will triple her pay by leaving teaching public school and have time to live a life outside of the classroom...

    Anyone thinking of becoming a teacher.. don't... it's not worth it, no one cares about the children regardless of what you might have heard...

  47. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Let me plug that into my computer here. *crunch crunch* Ah here's the answer: 42.

    Nobody writes jokes in base 230.

    But there are people who don't get D. Adams references. BTW: There is no integer base such that 42 = 272 decimal.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  48. It may be counterintuitive, but ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Who knew leaving a bank of computers on 24/7 costs money?"

    It doesn't. It saves money. Computer failures are much more likely as a result of regular power cycling than extended use, and the cost of parts replacement and down time far outweighs the cost of powering them regularly in low power mode.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:It may be counterintuitive, but ... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Computer failures are much more likely as a result of regular power cycling than extended use, and the cost of parts replacement and down time far outweighs the cost of powering them regularly in low power mode.

      Though in such a low powered mode they are unlikely to be running BOINC or anything else.

    2. Re:It may be counterintuitive, but ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Though in such a low powered mode they are unlikely to be running BOINC or anything else."

      If one means ACPI/APM low power mode, then yes. If one means the very low power consumed by using the processor and NIC, but not hard disk and graphics card then not so much. BOINC runs in a low power mode when speaking relative to typical computer use scenarios.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  49. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Highlight 17x16
    2. Right-click "Search Google for '17x16'"
    3. Return "17x16 multiswitch - offers from 17x16 multiswitch manufacturers ..." from www.tradekey.com.
    4. Amend search to "17 x 16"
    5. Return 272

    -Or-

    17x6
    34x8
    68x4
    136x2
    272

  50. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the ridicules paper work. Pay the fucking teachers.

    Maybe if they werent always ridiculing the paperwork...

  51. Except you forgot to read by n00btastic · · Score: 1

    Machines last longer if it is in use, and the estimated cost of running SETI is a measly $1 a month.

  52. Seems like the good Dr. overreacted a bit. by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Sure, Niesluchowski screwed up by installing the Seti@Home software on the district's computers without permission. I would expect that his lawyer is now going over the district's AUP with a fine-toothed comb to see if there was an actual policy violation to justify his firing. A reprimand should have been the first step; firing should have been the final step. I'd tell the guy to take the software off all the systems on his own time before I'd fire him. I'm betting that there must have been some long-term friction between the two for this to come to a firing.

    The claim that it cost a boatload of money to fix the "problems" sounds familiar, doesn't it. There is rarely a computer break-in or misuse that hits the news that doesn't claim that it cost millions to restore the system to working order. (Really? Does it really cost one's employer that much money when a server is restored from am backup tape? A couple of those and I could retire.) Makes you wonder if she went and hired some overpriced consultant to click through to the Windows Remove Software menu selection to get Seti@Home off the systems.

    The funny side of this is some of the wild assertions that the Superintendent made about the side effects of running the software. For example, one has a very difficult time thinking how leaving the computers on 24hr/day can cause the processors to wear out. Hell, I've got a Pentium MMX motherboard that has been running nearly continuously since it was purchased back in the mid-90s. Damn thing won't die.

    Oh, well. Yet another data point that further confirms my theory that the cluefulness of school district superintendents is inversely proportional to their salary.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  53. Please, no, stop this old silliness! by DamonHD · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless the school is (a) being heated with electricity and (b) not having to *cool* its computer labs, this is untrue.

    Electrical resistance heating is a terrible waste of high-grade energy.

    If you *were* to want to heat with electricity, a heat-pump would give you two or three times the heat for the same electrical input. (And thus $$$, CO2 emissions, etc.)

    Rgds

    Damon

    --
    http://m.earth.org.uk/
    1. Re:Please, no, stop this old silliness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electrical resistance heating is a terrible waste of high-grade energy.

      If you *were* to want to heat with electricity, a heat-pump would give you two or three times the heat for the same electrical input. (And thus $$$, CO2 emissions, etc.)

      No. The energy fed into a computer is almost completely converted to heat. I don't see how you can do better than that, unless you've found a way to get more than 100% efficiency.

    2. Re:Please, no, stop this old silliness! by Kidbro · · Score: 1

      Except that with a heat-pump, heat is not generated per se, but rather moved into the building, at an effeciency that actually is greater than 100% (meaning, you'll get more heat moved in than you would have gotten from just converting the electricity to heat through resistance) from a local (i.e. the building's) perspective.

  54. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    Maybe if they werent always ridiculing the paperwork...

    Yup I'm a horrible speller... Product of our wonderful U.S. public education system!

  55. SETI@home is a waste by scrib · · Score: 1

    FTA: "We support educational research and certainly would have supported cancer research," said Higley superintendent Denise Birdwell.

    SETI makes for decent Sci-Fi and story telling, but it is a far, far cry from "research." This is especially true of the screen-saver analysis of radio frequencies. Humans are only just now barely capable of observing the reflected light from a planet around another star. Unless alien civilizations are beaming huge quantities of radio energy into deep space, we won't see it above the noise. Further, the round-trip time of light to any but the closest stars makes two-way communication impossible. You might as well try to communicate between Australia and the USA with smoke signals.

    Sure, SETI has a romantic pull to it, but there's no justification for it. Cancer research, or any of a number of other distributed tasks, could end up having a positive effect on human well-being. Not to say THOSE applications SHOULD have been installed, but at least it might have counted as a mitigating factor...

    --
    Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    1. Re:SETI@home is a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Distributed cancer research wouldn't be here if it weren't for SETI.

    2. Re:SETI@home is a waste by sznupi · · Score: 1

      SETI@home searches also for pulsars, primordial black holes and new kinds of astrophysical phenomena that are outside of scope of "ET"

      http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ap_info.php

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  56. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe she could spend some time teaching you spelling and grammar?

  57. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by defaria · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why don't you go become a fucking teacher and take care of 20 to 30 children with little to no help from anyone for less than what you could make at Wendy's flipping burgers

    Wouldn't that be the definition of somebody who either isn't that bright or who is bad in math? Spare me the "she does it because she loves it" crap. If that were truly the case then just STFU and enjoy that which you say you enjoy.

  58. After a decade, its the bosses fault. Bogus. by Bob_Who · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there were so many resources squandered over a decade then the loss should have been apparent immediately. Since this fellow adequately managed the school districts IT resources all of this time, then clearly he should be the best judge of the demand. And since he works for executives and a school board that are responsible for the oversight of all resources, then either Seti@Home had little or no noticeable impact on the operations, or else it would have been an issue in a few weeks. To say that after 10 years of complete oblivion that now suddenly, this is grounds for dismissing a 10 year veteran, is total and complete political bull pucky. These ego-maniacal incompetent power trippers are simply embarrassed at the fact that they were completely clueless about their school districts involvement in something clearly present in any search engine: Their network listed as the number one seti@home support. Clearly this is an educational usage, was not an embezzlement of resources, and contributed to a very credible UC Berkeley experiment. One must bear in mind that when Seti@Home was first released that its appeal was how it functioned as an internet wide application that utilizes unused CPU headroom. That concept does pertain to IT management of resources, irregardless of merit of alien white noise. I think these jokers showed exactly how clueless you have to be in order to fix a decade long IT problem by firing the guy who demonstrated that its clearly not a problem.

  59. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by deprecated · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love the part in "It's a Wonderful Life" when you sucker punch George Bailey and Martini kicks you out of his bar. You were totally believable.

  60. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Or maybe public school in America isn't really about education, in most places.

    How about we break up the family by pressuring the mother in to working outside the home, either by putting an extreme tax the husband's wages, or showering her with propaganda which implies a woman's traditional role in the home is some form of vile repression -- chains from which she must liberate herself.

    With mother and father out of the way, working long hours, we can send the children to a state institution where they will be "educated". While they will receive perfunctory instruction in reading and writing, the primary sociological function of this institution is to indoctrinate the children with the state's version of history, to teach them obedience to authority, and to condition them to view agents of the state as authority figures. Ideally the child will come to view the state as a kind of surrogate parent, since they will likely spend more time in our institution than they will with their parents.

    "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."

  61. Pseudoscience by Frankie70 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not everyone believes SETI is real science - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SETI#Criticism

    1. Re:Pseudoscience by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's hardly a matter of "believe" whether or not something qualifies as real science, the methodology matters; even when not finding anything with its methods in our galactic vicinity, SETI gives us an important data refining the probabilities of technological civilizations, our long term survival outlooks, etc.

      Also, SETI is complimentary with other areas of astronomy. Heck, SETI@home searches not only for "ET" ( http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ap_info.php section "Sources of pulses"); it brought the idea of distributed computing into the mainstream and gave other scientific endeavors BOINC to use.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  62. Religious angle by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    Is it possible this guy was fired for trying to help prove something that would offend the religious beliefs of the supervisor - who may believe that we are alone in the universe because we were specially created by god?

    'an educational institution ... cannot support the search for E.T

    Is this in the same vein as "An educational institution cannot support the teaching of evolution" ?

    1. Re:Religious angle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or more like "an educational insitution cannot support the teaching of intelligent design"

    2. Re:Religious angle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      to elaborate: the GP implied that this happens because the board are religious nuts, while the one objectively bordering superstition is the guy that searches fo ET.Or, at least it finds an insane pleasure in being in the top crunchers list.

    3. Re:Religious angle by sznupi · · Score: 1

      No.

      Assuming that there are ET whose existence only needs to be confirmed is superstitious.

      To know anything about their prevalence, you have to search a bit (and we are doing just that, "a bit", with limited technical capabilities and minimal funds). Dismissing this, necessary for scientific evaluation, step is bordering on superstitious...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  63. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Funny
    Why don't you go become a fucking teacher

    I'd love to, but none of the schools around here have courses in fucking for me to teach.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  64. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    That sounds entirely too logical for New York State to ever consider doing it. More's the pity.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  65. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid it's worse than that...the administrators who act as gatekeepers, whether through hiring or certification decisions, have nothing to gain from letting those devoted people into the profession. I'm a casualty of that myself (hence the AC).

  66. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Teaching people ways to break down problems into smaller problems, ones that they are hopefully more familiar with, is one of the most important things you can teach someone. I keep doing this with a young friend of mine who frequently asks "how can you do that in your head?" because it seems impossibly hard to her. I've watched her gradually learn to do it herself... it's a very rewarding feeling to see her get better and better at it. And it's amazing that she was never taught this in public school.

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  67. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by devnulljapan · · Score: 1

    You want good teachers? Fucking pay them. Not the text book companies or all the other leeches.. Pay the fucking teachers.

    Yes!!! Can't agree more. Everybody bitches about this stuff, then turns around and blames the teachers, which is total horseshit. Shows where the priorities lie when the people given the task of educating or healing the populace get such shitty wages. Teachers and nurses always get shafted.

  68. Sounds like misuse to me by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Despite his intentions, the fact is if someone installs an unauthorised application on 2000 PCs, one which consumes 100% CPU when it feels like it, that person IS causing harm to the school district. At the very least they are jacking up power bills because PCs are running full blast more ofte but also support calls as people complain their machine is locked, slow or otherwise less responsive than it should be.

    I think he should have gotten permission. He could have argued that BOINC (not just S@H) can do real science and promote visibility of the district. And if the answer was no he should have left it at that.

  69. Component research is a sunk cost by turing_m · · Score: 1

    I do work for others at about $55 / hour. Just spend the time I did on researching

    Researching components is a sunk cost - unless you want to get mismatched components and pay too much for them in your pre-built computer of choice. The other thing doing your own component research will do is allow you to optimize your computer for low power, silence, speed, reliability and price. Do I want to spend the next 4-6 years putting up with a loud, slow, expensive to run and unreliable machine? I'll spend many more hours regretting my purchase if I don't spend the research hours up front.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  70. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by selven · · Score: 1

    272. It's about breaking up a problem into small parts, a very useful skill.

  71. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an idiot, and your response typifies the arrogant geek who thinks (a) it is really not necessary to know anything as long as you can eventually work it out/look it up; (b) understanding simple concepts requires a special insight normally reserved for the select few. One does not learn his times tables as a substitute for understanding, but as an aid to applying his understanding. This in itself is barely something that needs to be taught, except to those who have particular difficulty in grasping number: it's a natural consequence of understanding division/factorisation/etc. It is how I have observed those with no particular interest otherwise in mathematics always make use of their times tables.

    For the example you give, since I would also expect a competent educator to recommend learning of squares up to the 20th, the student would instantly apply 16x16+16. If not, he would perhaps mentally perform 2x(2x10x8-3x8). More painfully but available, 10x16+7x12+7x4.

  72. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "In effect, my state is subsidizing a monopoly to do a worse job for more money."

    So what you are trying to tell us is that your state is governed by a government?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  73. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "Or, alternatively, people who were given a calculator way too early and thus couldn't pass math because without one they couldn't say what 7*9 is."

    ... or how to reorganize their sentence so it doesn't end in a preposition?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  74. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a math teacher in DC public schools. I just had a whole lesson on how to solve problems just like that one. Broke down the work arounds for all of the basic operations. Some were "got it" and were impressed. Can't say I did as well with the rest.

  75. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by selven · · Score: 1

    what 7*9 is

    end in a preposition

    Well, that depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.

  76. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    Pay the fucking teachers.

    Obligatory

  77. Hmm. by yanguang · · Score: 1

    Suppose it was Folding@home or Rosetta@home instead. Would it have been any different?

  78. email your gripe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Dr Denise Birdwell,

    How can you hold your head up high and call yourself a doctor of education? A doctor in any field is such because of a higher ideal of pursuing excellence and the pursuit of knowledge. It doesn't just stop with a piece of paper you can post on the wall. You might as well have received yours from an internet site. Clearly you haven't a clue as to what the meaning of doctor really is.

    Using the district's computers for the search for knowledge, especially within the education system, could not be more appropriate.

    You are an embarrassment, not only within your own district and the state of Arizona, but now around the world. You have amplified the international perception that Americans are weak on science. Shame on you. If anyone should be fired it is you.

    ***If everyone sends this email to the following recipients, the first being (Dr ;) Birdwell, there might be some action.
                        dbirdwell@husd.org
                    Cc: pcarpenter@husd.org, gland@husd.org, paul.howell@husd.org, kanderson@husd.org, dstandage@husd.org, vwhitener@husd.org, info@ostp.gov, dstine@ostp.eop.gov, rweiss@ostp.eop.gov, news-tips@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, letters@nytimes.com

  79. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by guy5000 · · Score: 1

    You forget again that teachers only work for 180 days of the year in New York State, sure the 60hr weeks may not balance out the 180 days of work but it is something to consider. Also consider that teachers receive good benefits like most public employees. Also does the teacher in question have tenure?

  80. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sad truth will continue to occur until intelligent, capable people begin to devote their lives toward the education of our children. Unless that happens, the majority of our public educators will forever be the people who couldn't pass math because they weren't able to figure out their calculator.

    Bullshit, my wife is a teacher here in NC. Been teaching for 7 years now and she makes under 35k a year and spends 60+ hours a week at school. She loves teaching but has had to go back to graduate school in order to escape the bullshit pay, no planing period, no assistant and the ridicules paper work. Why don't you go become a fucking teacher and take care of 20 to 30 children with little to no help from anyone for less than what you could make at Wendy's flipping burgers...

    You want good teachers? Fucking pay them. Not the text book companies or all the other leeches.. Pay the fucking teachers.

    Wow, does NC have a super low cost of living?

    Move to NJ

    I work at in a school district and I just pulled it up on http://php.app.com/edstaff/search.php

    The numbers vary depending on subject taught and grade level.

    There is a HS Biology teacher with a BS and 7 years experience making 77k.

    On the lower side there is a health/gym teacher with a BS and 7 years experience making 45k.

  81. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Etherized · · Score: 1

    The short length of our school year is another piece of bullshit that hurts both teachers and students. It's true that teachers only work part of the year, and that seems to be a consideration for their pay scale, but what sort of professional job is going to be available for only two months in the summer? They may work less, but they have no way to convert that extra time to (decent) revenue.

  82. the problem is someware else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    having one man in charge of 5000 computers where all the users are either adolescents or educators is asking for trouble. what exactly is premature CPU failure? and why would 2700 cpus fail at the same time? ( i don't get it i have a 486 that has been running sense it was introduced!) or is it that the school system has to much money to spend on technology and not enough on computer literacy and basic computer matinence!(or education in genral) miss allocation of educational funds has been a long and reoccurring problem, annything to help inept educators and over paid administrators slip by the media.

  83. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

    I think your wife may be a good example of the solution, not the problem.

    I did not mean to offend. In fact, I very much agree with what I believe to be your central point. Money might be a good way to entice a decent teaching staff. Unfortunately, public institutions will never be able to meet professional wages.

    But it looks like we do have a good teacher in your wife, without the better pay. Like I said, the solution is for quality people to sacrifice good pay and a higher standard of living for the education of our children. This seems to be the choice your wife has made.

    I thank her for making the world a better place.

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  84. Wow, Troll? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Moderation has gone directly into the toilet. It might not be that funny, but it's no troll; it's a counterexample to an ignorant comment.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  85. Real nerds build their own. by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Real nerds always build their own because finding exactly what you need off the shelf is pain in the ass. Yes, I want a silent case and hard drive, Intel graphics (so the 3D automatically works and I don't have to deal with graphics drivers every time I update), yes I want at least 2 PCI slots for those other cards that I have, etc, etc.
    It takes less time to just get the parts and put it together yourself than to try to find something that has all the characteristic you need.

  86. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by St.Creed · · Score: 1

    My son is learning to calculate, multiply etc. at the moment. I use the reduction method at every opportunity, showing him different means of reducing the sums to manageable proportions. Today we discussed 7x8. It took him a while to add up all the eights. Then I told him that 7x8 was 5x8 and 2x8. He knows that 5x8 = 8x5 = 40, so now he only needed to add 16. "Wow, that's easy dad!" was the reply.

    He started asking about adding and counting a few months ago and ever since then I'm teaching him: break down the problem. He understands perfectly how it works.

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  87. You want good teachers? Fucking pay them. by doug141 · · Score: 1

    I know what you intended to say is "pay my wife more for the teaching she does." What I heard was "Offer teachers more and you can find a better teacher to replace my wife."

    1. Re:You want good teachers? Fucking pay them. by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      I know what you intended to say is "pay my wife more for the teaching she does." What I heard was "Offer teachers more and you can find a better teacher to replace my wife."

      No I want my wife out of teaching altogether. But no one is going to do the work she does for the pay she gets so people can keep bitching about how teachers suck and how they are the reason why children are dumb as rocks but you got what you paid for.

  88. Government grants, tax subsidies? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    If there was any way to claim a tax subsidy or a grant for using these resources for research, in the context of the educational establishment, then maybe the people running the institutions there would think differently.

    The problem I have with all this, is if the person in charge of IT at a school can't make IT related decisions, then there is an issue. At the same time, where should the final authorisation end up? Does it really need to go right to the top?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  89. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your wife should also teach you proper grammar and spelling. Ridicules is not the same as ridiculous.

  90. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by briareus · · Score: 1

    Knee jerk much? The response you're attacking is correct. It stands to follow that intelligent, capable people demand better compensation. Nowhere in the comment you're attacking was the statement that such people needed to selfessly give themselves away to the school districts. We clearly do need better educators if people can't read and comprehend stuff online and resort to assuming that random statements are made when they clearly are not.

  91. Why? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    "If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for."

    Why? Support your sick point of view with argumentation.

    Its not being used for anything else. They should help science if they pretend to be an educational institution

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why?

      Because the electric company doesn't give power away for free. RTFA, he admits that running SETI@Home consumes more power than sitting idle. While the amounts claimed were ridiculous, the actual amounts are non-zero and not insignificant.

  92. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Taxman415a · · Score: 1

    Of course, I still don't understand why we require teachers to have a bachelors or masters degree to teach grade school

    Depends on the subject of course, but you'd be surprised how much expertise you need in math for example to properly teach students the concepts behind the mathematics they are supposed to learn at the grade school level. The current standards call for them to learn number and operations (arithmetic etc), algebra, geometry, and data analysis and probability all with understanding. It doesn't take much mathematical knowledge to be able to do these things yourself, but current research is building that it takes a lot of knowledge to understand what a student is thinking and how best to help them learn a given concept. The knowledge of a subject that a teacher needs is in many ways deeper than that which a practitioner needs. In fact probably the biggest problem in math education today is that most elementary education teachers go into elementary ed partly because they hate math and their math skills are very poor. The bachelor's degree they get only gets them started on the mathematical knowledge they need to teach properly.

  93. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In the end almost everybody loses -- the school districts, the taxpayers and the private enterprises"

    You forgot the most important thing to say when trying to make a point about schools.... ....think of the children!

  94. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Nikkos · · Score: 1

    You want the teachers to get paid? Then stop with ridiculous retirement plans that siphon off huge amounts of money to pay the retired teachers.

    My grandmother was a teacher, stopped teaching 30 years ago but still makes over 30k/year in retirement, plus medical.
    My Father was a teacher, stopped teaching 10 years ago and still brings in 25k/year in retirement, plus medical

    You realize in Minnesota we spend 11,000 dollars per student per year (Gen E-12 education fund plus property tax levies (9 Bil)/ 823k students) - or $330,000 dollars to teach a class of 30 students. In some districts, over half the money spent on education goes to pay teachers that arn't teaching anymore.

    You want more money for teachers and students? Say FUCK YOU to the Union, take the pension away and give them a 401k like the rest of us. Then in 30 years once the current entitlement tit-suckers have died off we might have a chance.

  95. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Taxman415a · · Score: 1

    Your wife is one of the relatively few highly dedicated teachers. Most teachers don't put in that much extra time simply because they don't have to, or don't know what to do with their time to become better teachers. One of the problems is that the teacher that clocks in when school starts and leaves as soon as it ends gets paid the same as your wife. Until teachers have the proper incentives to be good teachers and be truly professional about their jobs, the opinion of the profession and the pay will not improve.

    The other problem is that almost universally, teachers get paid more only by having more experience. So your wife is probably a new teacher. An experienced teacher can easily make well over twice that much money and not put in that much time. So many teachers are over paid.

    The answer is pay for performance and proper incentives, but that is extremely difficult to do well and not have it turn into a system that distorts learning rather than supports it or one where the administrator's or union president's friends are the only one's that get the bonuses. Because of these issues and the unions not wanting to give up power, pay for performance will likely not get implemented any time soon, even though there are answers for the issues.

  96. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by celle · · Score: 1

    35K?? I made under 35K doing technical work on airplanes and people could die if I make a mistake. If you think 35K is low for teaching my sister made about 25k as a teacher in Nebraska under worse conditions and after nearly a decade at it.

  97. Idling vs. doing something useful by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    A computer that is truly idling consumes, for example, 100 watts without doing anything useful. The same computer running a distributed project, consumes for example 150 watts, while contributing to scientific research. Therefore, in many cases a distributed project has a much better bang/buck ratio.

    Of course, scientific research is being done in any case. If there are no volunteer computers, then it is the research institutes that spend money on computers and electricity. In either case you could argue that money is being wasted, if you think science has no value.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  98. So this is about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the failure of micromanagement a authoritarian leadership..

    Great!

  99. is there a reason you're practically illiterate? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Does your wife happen to teach English? Maybe she can give you some pointers.

  100. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by budgenator · · Score: 1

    But there are people who don't get D. Adams references.

    Some of us are real nerds and some are posers.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  101. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe that 60 hour estimate. Neither should you. Maybe she is spending time with another fucking teacher.

  102. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by budgenator · · Score: 1

    While they will receive perfunctory instruction in reading and writing, the primary sociological function of this institution is to indoctrinate the children with the state's version of history, to teach them obedience to authority, and to condition them to view agents of the state as authority figures.

    Yeah like that is working well, we have a bunch of increasingly Narcissistic, ADHD and Oppositional Defiant Disorder kids that are stupid in ways that transcend being poorly educated, ignorant, uncritical thinkers or lacking in native intelligence. I'm almost glad they view the state as the authority figure instead of me!

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  103. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    You forget again that teachers only work for 180 days of the year in New York State, sure the 60hr weeks may not balance out the 180 days of work but it is something to consider. Also consider that teachers receive good benefits like most public employees. Also does the teacher in question have tenure?

    Yes she has tenure, and she did have good benefits but they are being cut each and every year. As far as the fable that teachers are off summers I can assure you that it's mostly untrue or at least here in NC. My wife spends most of her summer in workshops learning new ways to add numbers or about new requirements for this or that. Most of workshops sound like nothing more than a paycheck for some publisher or curriculum specialist to me. She's a bit more positive about them and only thinks 50% or so are total bullshit.

    NC is pretty bad when it comes to education pay so NY might be better. We talked about moving to another state where she would make more but the pay isn't the only problem with being a teacher. The main problem for her is that the job doesn't have anything to do with teaching children anymore. It's all about the "statistics" and filling out paperwork that never even gets looked at, the fabled "permanent record" we all remember. This paperwork isn't a bad thing but she isn't provided with any time to do it. Ends up working from 7am to 5pm every day. Last Thursday and Friday she didn't get home until around 7pm and that happens all the time.

    What I find pretty insane is how they throw all of the kids in the same room now days. Imagine having children with IQ's between 77 and 120 all trying to learn the same thing. And we aren't talking about 2+2=4. They teach algebra (using shapes for variables), history, science, etc.

    I work in IT and honestly sit on my ass doing 1/1000th what she does each day, make more money and don't even have a degree. (I dropped out of college)

  104. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    Maybe she could spend some time teaching you spelling and grammar?

    I would love to spend time with my wife, she currently has a 4.0 in grad school and is best spelling. good gramering. Teach me lots if only not at work.

  105. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    Wow, does NC have a super low cost of living?

    Lower yes, but NC doesn't pay teachers jack. She teaches k-6 so you can check that. We live in Western NC which makes the pay even lower from what I understand. Yes we could move, talked about it even but it will not fix anything other than her pay. Such low pay pisses me off more than her. She hates the long hours, inhuman requirements and bureaucratic bullshit.

    We have an "education Lottery" here in NC but that money doesn't really go to education. It goes to all the contractors for their substandard services , to buy new math books every other year with the chapters moved around and to whoever else pays the politicians off.

  106. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    I did not mean to offend. In fact, I very much agree with what I believe to be your central point. Money might be a good way to entice a decent teaching staff. Unfortunately, public institutions will never be able to meet professional wages.

    My wife would be fine with the pay if it didn't involve working 7am to 7pm and being 25 kids only real parents. *alright only about half the parents are too busy to show up once every 9 weeks for a meeting or help their kids with their homework. I'm exaggerating when I say all 25.

  107. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

    I thought her name was 37 of double-D.

  108. Mod Parent Up! by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up!

  109. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    The other problem is that almost universally, teachers get paid more only by having more experience. So your wife is probably a new teacher. An experienced teacher can easily make well over twice that much money and not put in that much time. So many teachers are over paid.

    There is some truth in this. She really isn't a new teacher anymore but they keep forcing her to teach different grades which makes her have to scramble every year when they don't let her know until a week before school starts. The old teachers never get asked to move grades and don't end up with the trouble makers. Since she is new'ish it's easy to blame/fire her when 100% of children don't do well on the end of grade tests and makes a handy excuse to keep new teachers from becoming paid too much. O.. odd thing is the kids still pass and move on to the next grade regardless of if they fail or not which I don't really get but eh the kids seem to figure it out pretty fast. Luckily for my wife she is a great teacher and hasn't had any problems with moving enough kids test scores but she sure doesn't have any time to do all the paper work which is why she works so late.

    The answer is pay for performance and proper incentives,

    It's funny you mention this. She was promised a bonus last year if she and all of the others that teach at her school met some goal. They did their part but aren't getting their bonus because of the recession. Same thing happened a few years ago but with some other excuse. Bottom line is she knows that nothing she is told means jackshit and there is never enough money to pay her even though there seems plenty to pay the administration staff their bonuses.

    Most teachers are good people, to good... they get walked all over because they want to help kids, but that's ok, it's what we apparently want as a country. Stupid people do make great pets...

  110. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's clearly the size of a small painting!

  111. Re:Devil's advocate - Public reaction by ctmurray · · Score: 1

    No one has yet mentioned a motivation to fire the guy by the district is the public reaction to all of this. If they don't fire the guy the tax paying public would go nuclear with the board. And bad karma between your taxpayers and your school district is really hard to turn around, it can take years. Meantime any levies you need will be significantly harder or impossible to pass.

    In our district we could not pass levies because of ill will from a levy more than 20 years prior. At that time the public was "promised" that a new Sr. High School would not be required and that a second floor could be added to the existing Sr. High if needed (structurally this was actually not possible). I moved in after this event, and no one can show me documentation that his promise was made. Needless to say the district grew in 15 years and they ended up building a new Sr. High (the old Sr. High was turned into a Jr. High School as they needed this capacity as well so it was not wasted).

    So a PR fiasco about this SETI issue would be bad enough that this was going on with no educational values (as no one was "teaching" from this expense), it would double the negative effect if you did not fire the person.

  112. SETI@home screen saver burn an image in my screen by dmhayden · · Score: 1

    Personally, I stopped using the SETI@home screen saver years ago when I realized that it was burning an image in my screen - kind of the opposite of what a screen saver is supposed to do. Sure it won't happen now with my flat screen, but it pissed me off so much that I won't use it again.

  113. 2400 machines, huh? by PMuse · · Score: 1

    . . . unauthorized software, BOINC, found on nearly 5,000 district computers which sorts through telescope-collected data . . . . Officials allege this ongoing use caused processors to burn out quickly, requiring early replacement of 2,400 processors.

    1. So, let me get this straight: 2400 machines burned out? That'd be newsworthy all by itself. I'd like to see those 2400 machines that were fried by over-use.

    2. I'd also like to see the other 5000-2400=2600 machines that the same software didn't fry.

    I'd hate to think that these guys just identified a bunch of machines to replace and then blamed it on their least favorite employee.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  114. Re:SETI@home screen saver burn an image in my scre by sznupi · · Score: 1

    You can thank yourself, for leaving screensaver settings more or less intact but disabling monitor shut down.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  115. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah like that is working well, we have a bunch of increasingly Narcissistic, ADHD and Oppositional Defiant Disorder kids that are stupid in ways that transcend being poorly educated, ignorant, uncritical thinkers or lacking in native intelligence. I'm almost glad they view the state as the authority figure instead of me!

    But don't you see? Those are exactly the kind of people we are trying to build. Selfish people who can't concentrate or cooperate. Isolated, ignorant individuals are much easier to control than thoughtful people with many friends. Ultimately they must eat, and therefore, they must work for us.

  116. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0x110

    Bad choice of numbers for this site.

  117. All this physics/engineering/computer geek by cts5678 · · Score: 1

    All this physics/engineering/computer geek mumbo-jumbo about energy use and whatnot completely misses the point. The key point is whether or not the district had a policy on what software could be installed and what could not be, whether that policy was known by and understood by the system administrator, and whether the SETI software in question was disallowed under the policy (if any) or not. If there was a policy, which was understood by the system administrator to not allow installation of the SETI software and he did it anyway, then his goose is cooked. Otherwise, the district is probably going to be paying him damages as well as possibly giving him his job back.

  118. Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    You haven't followed New York State politics. They're not interested in solving problems for their constituents or saving tax-payer money.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  119. Long-term damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the amount of money this school district wastes, I don't think any seti-related costs would affect them financially. They wanted to fire the guy using seti as justification. They'll succeed but at a great cost to the community. They have exposed how myopic the educators in this district are. What long-term damage they are causing to the children in this district.