Slashdot Mirror


Pneumatic Tube Communication In Hospitals

blee37 sends along a writeup from the School of Medicine at Stanford University on their pneumatic tube delivery system, used for sending atoms not bits. Such systems are in use in hospitals nationwide; the 19th-century technology is enhancd by recent refinements in pneumatic braking. "Every day, 7,000 times a day, Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes, cutting-edge technology in the 19th century, for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry can't match: A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye."

350 comments

  1. Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the point of this article is that physical tasks, like plumbing or carrying infected blood, can't be done electronically ?!?!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by sopssa · · Score: 1

      The reason why they do this is NOT about cost cutting.

    2. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Clearly these kids never heard of Sneakernet®.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    4. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But with the new PIZZA MAKER 3000, you will be downloading your own pizzas in the blink of an eye!

      Our new patented system will transmit the energy across your regular phone line, no need for a special line.
      And thanks to the lovely people at CERN, a portable blackhole generator is then used to convert this energy in to mass ready to be assembled in to whatever pizza you can think of, from pineapple and pepperoni to plain old classical cheese.

      Now yours for only $24,999.

    5. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by stfvon007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pizza hut is now suing customers that use the pizzamaker 3000 to download unauthorized copies of their pizzas through PneumaticPizzatorrents. papa johns and domino's are considering following suite. It is being shown that only 3% of all pizzas downloaded are legal public domain or open source pizzas.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    6. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Talk to these guys.

      You may find the density a little lacking; but I suspect that they don't even notice EMP.

      More broadly, a lot of the early analog computers were hydraulic(presumably this was easier than pneumatic, since water is more or less incompressible under standard conditions); but there would be nothing stopping the suitably enthusiastic individual from building pneumatic analog computers. Or, for that matter, digital ones. The cool kids in microfluidics have done some poking at the idea. pneumatic logic gates.

    7. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Discordantus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool, and they're old tech. To many persons of geeky persuasion (including me), this type of thing is fascinating.

    8. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Insightful

          You may have thought you were making a joke, but that's the #1 reason that we do not have replicators yet. Sure, we *could* have the technology by now. There can't ever be any money in it. Make a device that can scan an object, and make a molecular clone of it? What would it's first task be? Make another one.

          Anything, absolutely anything, you can get your hands on, you could reproduce at any other station. All you would need is raw material, which would simply be something with atoms. (i.e., dirt into another tangible object)

          As long as we live in a capitalist world (ya, even the communists are capitalists these days), and money changes hands for goods, we will never have such a device.

          Pizzas are the fun example. Imagine if you could reproduce a CPU, DVD (molecularity, rather than data image), Rolex, Maserati, SR-71 Blackbird, or ... well, you get the idea. Not only would capitalism fall, but any individual net worth would be insignificant, as we could all have anything we wanted, any time we wanted. Beyond that, reproducing organic objects would be trivial. Need a heart transplant? No problem, we'll reproduce yours from the last scan where it was healthy.

          Excuse me, I feel like seeing how high *MY* SR-71 goes. I just replicated it, and made a few mods. :) The last few failed, so I just recycled them in the raw materials pit.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Yes it can, but teletransporters are expensive, and monopolized. You can only buy them from the Federation.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    10. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see it the other way around though - pneumatic computation.

      Steam rules.

    11. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by itsthebin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pneumatic Computation was use in early control rooms , with fully analog computation. Adders , Sumers , Square Root Extractors , PID controllers , switches.
      3 - 15 psi to represent 0 - 100 %

      when I did my Industrial Instrumentation Apprenticeship , pneumatics was a large part , and in some explosive enviroments it is still a preferred way to go.

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
    12. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You want to tell me that steampunk was here and we never really noticed?...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    13. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by jbengt · · Score: 1

      It's actually pretty common in controls work. Though digital controls have been slowly replacing pneumatic over the last 20 years, there's still quite a few places that use pneumatic controls, including analog and digital functions.

    14. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Informative

      So the point of this article is that physical tasks, like plumbing or carrying infected blood, can't be done electronically ?!?!

      RTFA, dude. By using adding high-tech sensors and computer controlled routing to the pneumatic tubing system, they are shipping things around way faster than people could carry them ... things that we could NOT ship in the 1980s.

      Being able to have a straight tube delivering bags of blood between OR and blood bank is an amazing time saver for staff.

    15. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome!!!

    16. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Katchu · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the FAX was invented in 1842! Seriously.

      --
      Keep Doing Good.
    17. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as we live in a capitalist world (ya, even the communists are capitalists these days), and money changes hands for goods, we will never have such a device.

      Capitalism is not just about exchanging goods. It's also about exchange of services. The relative value of goods and services are already reversed from what they used to be. Replicator technology will just push that to an extreme. Hell, open-source software is sort of like that, where you don't pay for the software, but for related services.

      Want to:

      * Hire a live band for your daughter's wedding?
      * Commission a painting?
      * Get a professional's advice (on just about anything)?
      * Research new technology?
      * Write new software?
      * Read an author's new book?
      * Go watch a play at the theater?
      * Go to Disneyland?

      Extremely low-cost goods will still allow capitalism to work just fine. Frankly, I think it's rather inevitable anyhow, barring any natural or self-inflicted apocalypse.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    18. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Being able to have a straight tube delivering bags of blood between OR and blood bank

      I'd kill to have that.

    19. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Two things: (1) You can't replicate it if you can't scan it.

      The scanning chamber size could be standardized such that another scanning chamber could not fit to be scanned.

      Scanning technology alone would be a very difficult feat. And there would (invariably) be some limitations, such as materials that don't scan properly.

      Manufacturers of consumer products could take advantage of this to produce "scan proof" products. A huge brand new market would be generated called "scan proofing" / "replicate proofing" your product. It would be for all consumer goods what DRM is for DVDs. Products (including replicators themselves) would contain proprietary chips with special shielding designed to protect them from scanners, or to cause replicators to error, resulting in a detectable breach.

      Replicators would be designed to ensure on booting up that they're not an "illegal clone". Product activation would be required, and each unit would have unique ID or "MAC address" and "signature" burned into a ROM chip.

      Every replicator would stamp a unique molecular signature on every clone it made, and the consumer good DRM would detect the signature and compare it to the manufacturer's signature, to ensure a legal copy.

      Problem (2) Energy is required to use the device. So there is still a market in producing the energy required to operate the device...

      For energy production, a replicator cannot simply be used to produce the raw materials (other than say 'solar cells'), at some point, materials required to produce energy still have to be acquired without using the replicator.

    20. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by deniable · · Score: 1

      Sure they did. This replaced it.

    21. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
      Wow, what a great application!

      If your apartment had a pneumatic tube point, you could order a pizza online, and the pizza place could roll it up and stuff it into a canister, and it could arrive minutes later! Wheee!

    22. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The point of this article is that pneumatic tube networks are frelling cool, and they're old tech. To many persons of geeky persuasion (including me), this type of thing is fascinating.

      Yeah, this just inspired me. When I build a house, I think I'm going to put in a pneumatic tube network. And I think I'm going to build a super-sized refrigerator with a robot arm. I think you can see where this is going....

      Computer, make me a sammich.

      bzzt, bzzt, bzzt, bzzt. Thuck... ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh... thuck.

      Mmmm.

      Orange juice, please.

      Bzzzzt. Clunk. Bzzzzzzzzzzzzt. Clunk. Bzt. Thuck... ssssshhhhh... thuck.

      *Pours into glass, places OJ bottle back into canister*

      Thuck... ssssssssshhhhhhh... thuck. Bzzt. Clunk. Bzzzzzzzzzzzt. Clunk. Bzzzzt.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    23. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to be so hard on him. He's probably running Adobe Reader on an XP box.

      I'd hate and fear PDFs as well, if they took 30-60 seconds to open on a fast machine and frequently contained exploits.

    24. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          The "scan proofing" would only be an target for people to subvert. Heck, we subvert just about every protection these days anyways, so it would just be an ongoing battle. The same applies to the scanning chamber size. So the initial one is built with a 1 cubic foot scanning and replication chamber, but the unit itself is 10 cubic feet. Someone else builds an "industrial" one that's 100 cubic feet. I wouldn't really see building one the size of a planet being practical, but who knows, maybe it would be for various purposes. You could get a planet the same way we get mobile homes now. "Where would you like your planet moved to?"

          Would energy really be a problem? If you were working at an atomic scale, shifting a few electrons from one atom to another would be a simple task. So I have sand as a source. I could output uranium. It would take care of that pesky task of disposing of waste materials. Toxic wastes could simply be reorganized into a usable material again.

          Exotic materials that are rare or nonexistent could become common place. In our current economy, it would be catastrophic. What if anyone could simply generate tons of gold, or other precious materials. Again, for simple reasons like this, such a machine would never be built.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    25. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Well, on #1, my daughter won't ever be allowed to date, so that problem is eliminated right off. :) It's easy to say right now, since she's a toddler, and the only man she loves is daddy. It's a concept I refuse to accept, at least for the next decade. :)

          I do see your point though. Things would be shifted from physical items, to more intellectual ones. I'd love to see humanity released from the need of things to live, to pursue more intellectual tasks. Oh, what we could do if money was not a restriction. People could go with their passions, and do what they really wanted. Right now, we could visit other planets, or explore deep into the oceans, or pursue arts or science. How many starving artists could rival the works of the "masters" if they weren't limited by their current needs for food, clothing, and shelter? We could do what we love, because we love it, not work loveless jobs because we need money to survive. Those are simple examples. People could find so many new ways to do what they love. I'm sure animal lovers would absolutely love to help sick and injured animals.

          It does bring up a problem though. I know most doctors would love to be able to save every patient, but so many can't be saved because simple things like donor organs aren't available. What if they were on an unlimited basis. We'd quickly overpopulate our planet, and many others. I'm sure wars would start though, that would take care of that problem pretty quickly. :( There's always someone with enough hate to ruin a good thing.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    26. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by dido · · Score: 1

      Turning sand into uranium or turning lead into gold is a trifle harder than shifting a few electrons around, as the alchemists found out early on. To do that you'd have to shift a not electrons, but protons and neutrons around, and that is a LOT harder. At that point, you're dealing with the force that keeps a lot of positively-charged protons together in a very small space, overcoming their electromagnetic repulsion. They don't call it the Strong Nuclear Force for nothing. No, even with that level of nanotech energy would still be a problem. It always is. TANSTAAFL.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    27. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually - it is. Imagine the amount of time and work needed to deliver all those small items like tissue samples, paper documents and X-rays around the hospital by hand.

      Sometimes time is of an issue, and a pneumatic tube is a simple and beautiful solution to a problem.

      Anyway - that delivery system is used in many other places than hospitals too. Like in supermarkets where the tellers can send excess cash to the vault without leaving their station.

      Even heavy industry uses it for transport of samples from the production line to the laboratory. I know that the cement industry uses it, and the sampling is fully automated.

      That technology is far from being obsolete, and sometimes it comes in very handy. Of course - you can't transport everything through it, and sometimes there are problems with the system which will require manual intervention by a plumber.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    28. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may have thought you were making a joke, but that's the #1 reason that we do not have replicators yet. Sure, we *could* have the technology by now. There can't ever be any money in it.

      That's also the #1 reason why we don't have open source software yet. There will never be any money in it, that's why it doesn't exist.

      Anything, absolutely anything, you can get your hands on, you could reproduce at any other station. All you would need is raw material, which would simply be something with atoms. (i.e., dirt into another tangible object)

      Hmm, just like alchemy. I could shovel in a pound of lead, press GO, and end up with a pound of gold. Sounds good!

      One thing you are forgetting is that you'd also need energy to run your replicator device. How much energy you would need would depend on what you wanted it to do, but I suspect it would be prohibitive. As a simple example, look at the amount of energy it takes to turn water into separate hydrogen and oxygen gases.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    29. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Exotic materials that are rare or nonexistent could become common place. In our current economy, it would be catastrophic. What if anyone could simply generate tons of gold, or other precious materials. Again, for simple reasons like this, such a machine would never be built.

      A nuclear weapon is also catastrophic. That's why nuclear weapons are never built, either.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    30. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      While I do think that's close to the future than we would like to admit I don't think that example is terribly accurate.

      Pizza Recipes are often the result of the challenge to mass produce a quality product. If the production end of things were removed from the equation and it purely came down to the aesthetic quality of the pizza there are far better options which are available in the public domain.

      Also Pizza is such a personal and subjective item, I can't imagine pizza hut actually surviving. When everyone gets to order the exact pizza slice they want then I imagine creativity and experimentation will be the 'order of the day'. Piracy in such a situation would be very similar to the current market: the Photoshop of pizzas would be widely pirated. The content produced by it, much less so. It seems though that a clever entrepreneur who hosts the saved files and offers a rating system would be able to make a pretty penny from advertising revenue.

    31. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Kleppy · · Score: 0

      Does "a series of tubes" apply here too?

    32. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by mysidia · · Score: 1

      That's why we have fiat currency... the economy is not built on precious metals anymore.

      Perhaps it would be bad for the economy in the long run, but beneficial for humanity.

      We could pursue more interesting, intellectual endeavors with our lives, rather than spending 30-40% of it working for money, for basic essentials, and toys.

      Burglars/thieves would be without a job... because all the stuff can be replicated at the push of a button.. most crime would be over.

      People would have to find more altruistic motivation to do everything they do in life..

      Or perhaps (given human nature), attention would be turned to fighting over resources that can't be replicated so easily, such as land.

    33. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Go read "The Diamond Age" by Neal Stephenson.
      It deals with a lot of these things and I like his writing because unlike many authors who do the "what is this tech existed" thing he gets into the aspect of "well someone has to figure out the details".

      It's all very well saying replicator technology could do X but what about the nitty gritty?

      You're going to need a significant source of material in a known form, extremely pure oxygen,nitrogen,carbon, and all the other atoms and common compounds you need to build any particular item and in reality the machinery needed to do that isn't going to be trivial or even small no matter how much nanotech you throw at the problem unless you don't mind it also being very slow.
      You're going to need a tightly controlled environment in which to construct your duplicates.
      You're going to have to actually know how to build the item in question since in reality just trying to scan something is unlikely to be a realistic way to do it and such fine grain resolution probably violates some laws like the uncertainty principle so it's much more likely that you're going to need to program in how you want any particular item constructed.

      Engineering problems don't disappear.
      Just look at some of the old Sci Fi predictions of what computers were going to be able to do.
      We should have true AI and other fun things by now according to old SF but in reality someone has to figure out the how which is hard.

    34. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by daveime · · Score: 1

      I'm registering ModMyPizza.com preemptively.

      Although I'm already a bit worried about all the Domino's Medium Cheese Anchovy takedown notices I'll receive.

    35. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by stupid_is · · Score: 1

      Well, on #1, my daughter won't ever be allowed to date, so that problem is eliminated right off. :) It's easy to say right now, since she's a toddler, and the only man she loves is daddy. It's a concept I refuse to accept, at least for the next decade. :)

      Mine too!

      I do see your point though. Things would be shifted from physical items, to more intellectual ones. I'd love to see humanity released from the need of things to live, to pursue more intellectual tasks. Oh, what we could do if money was not a restriction. People could go with their passions, and do what they really wanted. Right now, we could visit other planets, or explore deep into the oceans, or pursue arts or science. How many starving artists could rival the works of the "masters" if they weren't limited by their current needs for food, clothing, and shelter?

      How much of what we might term "high art" has been driven by the artist's suffering from poverty? I'm not saying it all is, but a lot of "good" art has been created by some rather traumatised folks which might not be the case in the scenario where all physical goods are nigh-on-free.

      Not that this would be a bad thing, I agree

      We could do what we love, because we love it, not work loveless jobs because we need money to survive. Those are simple examples. People could find so many new ways to do what they love. I'm sure animal lovers would absolutely love to help sick and injured animals.

      It does bring up a problem though. I know most doctors would love to be able to save every patient, but so many can't be saved because simple things like donor organs aren't available. What if they were on an unlimited basis. We'd quickly overpopulate our planet, and many others. I'm sure wars would start though, that would take care of that problem pretty quickly. :( There's always someone with enough hate to ruin a good thing.

      Dr Malthus would have his day in court when we overpopulate - either that or we go the China route, or folks just stop breeding so rapidly as there is so much more time to do that sort of thing courtesy of the increased life expectancy due to easy to replace parts

      But, how accurate would the scanners be? If you're creating replicated hearts with the same DNA structure to prevent organ rejection, what happens when someone with a large device jumps under the scanning gizmo? Then does that a lot and makes a cloned army? Maybe a "clone war"? Holy shit, George really was a visionary....

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
    36. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I'd suspect if we can make a molecular replica of something, organs would be completely compatible. What is DNA anyways? A collection of molecules. I would suspect that a person couldn't exactly be cloned. While it's common to say that we couldn't reinvent a "soul", I would believe it would be more difficult to duplicate the electrical charges which are what makes our brains. Likewise, you may be able to replicate a hard drive, but would it be readable? I guess if we were far enough to be able to reassemble electrons, we should be able to align them for the required charges too. Ahh, there's a whole new problem. :) Would a clone army be most appropriate though? For the more powerful army to be built, it would seem advantageous to use selective breeding. Through selection of the appropriate traits, each generation should be better for the suited task, as long as they are properly evaluated for unwanted traits. ... and for people who are going to get pissed off about that one, get over it. We've been selectively breeding just about every living thing that you know of, for generations. Even you were selectively bred. Lets hope that it was from your parents appropriately selecting a mate, and not out of desperation for companionship. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    37. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          There have been a lot of things in scifi that have come true. We create because we fantasize about it, and someone makes it come true. I can't say that will apply to everything, but it applies to a lot of things. Cars that drive over 20mph. Flying machines that can take you half way around the world in hours instead of weeks. Vehicles capable of transporting us into space. Personal communicators to allow you to talk to someone no matter where you are. We even have devices that can tell you where you are, and how to get somewhere else.

          If you were able to step back 50 years, and explain what is normal today, people would think you are nuts. Even the digital watch wouldn't be invented for another 10 years. I hope that in another 50 years, the same still applies. Heck, 20 years ago, there was no such thing as a DVD, although it seems like an obvious mate to the CD which didn't start into consumer production until 1981, and it wasn't until the mid 1980's that it was something practical, as most titles weren't even available on it until then.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    38. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the #1 reason we don't have replicators yet is that reality doesn't work like Star Trek. Chemistry, the arrangement of the most basic functional elements, is still hard enough that total syntheses of new molecules (including a lot of things you'd find in your average garden) can take years. If that.

      Some of the most fundamental elements this sort of tech would require -- a 3D scanner capable of resolving at molecular detail, for example -- would be enormously profitable. If it were about market pressure, we'd have one by now.

      I don't know whether you vastly overestimate human intelligence, or equally underestimate the complexity of the world outside of our own heads and the difficulty in understanding that world. I'm almost willing to believe you're trolling. Whatever it is, stop watching Star Trek, and go outside and look at bugs until you get your perspective back.

    39. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      open source pizzas.

      I'll take mine with anchovies and extra xargs.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    40. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Kool+Moe · · Score: 1

      So maybe it would be better for pizza rolls, or maybe even a calzone...
      )

      --
      Kinda like Moe, but just a little more Kool
    41. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Reziac · · Score: 1

      It's also a good example of *appropriate* tech for the job at hand, which is moving small objects to and from multiple locations as rapidly as possible. It's still in use because it's efficient and cost-effective for a sprawling facility that needs to move lots of small objects.

      Seems to be another benefit for money-handling is that it's relatively secure against in-transit pilferage, tho that doesn't rule out deliberate mis-routing.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    42. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Dang... and here I thought you were going to use it to deliver beer!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    43. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a potential lifesaver for that patient who's bleeding out. Sometimes you just don't *have* time to wait for someone to hoof it up the stairs.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    44. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't see how we could ever get to the point where money is not a restriction. Yes, some things may become super-cheap or even free in the future, such as software, and if replicators were invented just about anything you could fit in the replicator would be nearly free (only the cost of energy).

      However, some physical things will ALWAYS be scarce, and replicators cannot change that. Example #1: real estate. You might be able to replicate a nice house, but you can't replicate a prime location on the beach, in the middle of a forest far away from any neighbors, or whatever your ideal location happens to be. There's only so much land, and only so many places where people want to live, and then the fact that people don't usually get along that well when forced to live together in dense communities. So I really don't see how we'd ever get away from the need to have money to buy a place to live. There might be ultra-cheap places to live available, but those will be the ghettos, and people will want to pay more to live someplace nicer.

      And yes, life-extension technologies (or better yet, elimination of the aging process) would certainly increase our overpopulation problems severely, though it probably wouldn't be that bad as long as we have cars instead of more automated forms of travel (tens of thousands of Americans die in cars every year). We've already overpopulated this planet, as seen by the climate change, extinction of many species, etc., and it's only going to get worse. As for wars, historically those have never done very much to reduce global population. Even in WWII and its aftermath, with tens of millions being killed, that was just a small blip in the total global population, and within one generation the population already far exceeded the pre-war population. Only a large nuclear war would really do much to stunt human overpopulation.

    45. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Trains have been around since the early/mid 1800s, and they're still in wide use worldwide, especially for shipping large freight. Cars and their gasoline-powered internal combustion engines have been around since the early 1900s, and aren't very different from then. There's lots of "old" technologies still in widespread use.

    46. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by msgyrd · · Score: 1

      "Being able to have a straight tube delivering bags of blood between OR and blood bank is an amazing time saver for staff."

      So...a truth table of tubes?

    47. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Actually, I'm not much of a Star Trek fan. Funny that, huh? :) I'm frequently amazed at nature, and no matter how much time I spend in it, it's still amazing. Regardless of where I am.

          I've been close to the arctic circle, looking at trees growing in some of the most inhospitable places and frozen rivers with just a peek to see the water flowing.

          I've been in tropical places, where the closest living creatures were alligators and mosquitoes. Mind you, that's not a very comfortable place to be on a moonless night.

          I've chased coyotes in arid foothills, finding that I'm only armed with my voice and a small stick.

          I've stood in the deserts of the American Southwest, seeing no sign of humanity in every direction, and no contact with the "civilized" world.

          I even spend a lot of my time online outside. Before it got cold, I did most of my stuff online outside on a laptop. I sit still and quiet, only moving my fingers and occasionally picking up a cigarette. I've been approached by deer, armadillos, and raccoons who weren't aware I was there. I've been at peace with my environment, and it tends to be at peace with me.

          I love nature, and respect it deeply. In that, nature tends to respect me. At very least, it hasn't eaten me yet, but I've tended to avoid dangerous nature when it approaches.

          I do have a strong belief in our intellect. Just because you or I don't know how to do something, doesn't mean that there isn't someone out there who can. Then again, maybe you or I are the people who could work magic and advance humanity if we weren't constrained by the bounds of modern society.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    48. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by vaniderstine · · Score: 1

      Read "Lost in Transmission" by Wil McCarthy.

      --
      I "AM" ring-0.
    49. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Sure, we *could* have the technology by now.

      Really? I'd like some proof of that.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    50. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Prove that if society operated differently, there would be a different outcome by now? Prove that if talented people were allowed to use their talents, rather than working jobs that pay the rent, a series of technological advancements would or wouldn't have happened? That part I can't prove to you.

          I can say that there are a lot of talented people out there, who have inventions or innovations in their minds, but they will never see reality because of many limitations. There are several things I want to build, that simply don't exist yet. I don't have the money to do it, and it doesn't look like it will happen anytime soon. I'm just one person. There are countless others out there like me.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    51. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree, lots of things which aren't possible now will almost certainly be possible with advances in technology but the point I was trying to get across is there's always details to be figured out and problems along the way as any engineer will tell you.
      Just because something is possible doesn't mean it's easy.

    52. Re:Rollofle, you can't download a pizza either by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It's important to remember, anything worth doing isn't easy. Remember that next time you're in the bar with your beer goggles on, and the "cute" girl wants to sleep with you.. Trust me, you'll regret it in the morning.

          There's nothing like rolling over in the morning and saying "Dear god, what did I do?"

       

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  2. Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The bandwidth sucks.

  3. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They use wheels and manual labor that has been around for a melenia to transport patients. Not the cutting edge turbo jet engines found it military grade aircraft. Congress & senate to investigate why not.

  4. Re:I guess the only question is... by More_Cowbell · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess the only question is... why don't you take a look at TFA and get all your questions answered, instead of rushing here to try for a FP?

    --
    Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
  5. Shaken not stirred by Spazmania · · Score: 3, Funny

    James-Bond those urine samples.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Shaken not stirred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      James-Bond those urine samples.

      Don't you mean semen samples? I don't recall Bond being into golden showers.

    2. Re:Shaken not stirred by M8e · · Score: 0

      Goldfinger?

  6. Used in other places, too by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The ultra-modern pharmacy in the local town also uses pneumatic delivery for prescription drugs. You present your prescription at the counter, and the attendant checks it, then keys in the appropriate codes on the terminal. The pills/potion/whatever arrives via pneumatic tube while the instructions & labels are being printed. This is faster then the previous method where the same attendant would have to walk off and fetch the prescription materials.

    Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Used in other places, too by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative
      New York City used to have pneumatic mail tubes. (They shut them down when it got to the point that adding mail trucks started to be cheaper than adding tubing. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a truck, magnetic tapes or paper.)

      Heck, the first New York City subway was pneumatic. (It was also very short, and short-lived.)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Used in other places, too by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, and Roosevelt Island (in the river between Manhattan and Queens) has pneumatic garbage collection. It's the only place in the US besides Disneyworld to do that. Apparently it works somewhat-not-unlike a packet-switched network, periodically connecting garbage and recycling loads from different places to the appropriate suction via the same set of tubes.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, I wanna go and put my junk in those!

    4. Re:Used in other places, too by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      "appropriate suction"

      For once, that's a Freudian slip that's still funny due to relevance without the third grade euphemism.

      --
      I hate printers.
    5. Re:Used in other places, too by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 5, Funny

      So what you're saying is that mail in NYC is a truck you put things on, not a series of tubes?

    6. Re:Used in other places, too by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Somewhere in here, there's a joke about Java's garbage collection.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    7. Re:Used in other places, too by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      No, Java's is less efficient, so there's no comparison.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    8. Re:Used in other places, too by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Funny

          I wasn't aware that Freud wore a slip. That really clarifies a lot of other questions I had about him. God, I'm glad other bits never made it into the mainstream. Just imagine the Freudian corset, stockings, etc. I guess he took his Oedipus Complex a step beyond, eh?

          That's one mighty nice Freudian Chastity Belt(tm) you have there.

          I'm going to have nightmares for weeks. ick.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Used in other places, too by Haymaker · · Score: 1

      a NYC mail was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday. I got it yesterday. also, I wish I had modpoints for you..

    10. Re:Used in other places, too by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heck, the first New York City subway was pneumatic. (It was also very short, and short-lived.)

      Could that be because it sucked?

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    11. Re:Used in other places, too by Jay+L · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently it works somewhat-not-unlike a packet-switched network, periodically connecting garbage and recycling loads from different places to the appropriate suction via the same set of tubes.

      It was initially supposed to handle grocery delivery as well, but... routing problems.

    12. Re:Used in other places, too by v1 · · Score: 1

      Some banks also use pneumatic conveyance to send currency between the counters and the vault.

      And I'm amazed no one's mentioned the drive-up teller stations at the bank. All the ones except the one right at the building are pneumatic with those thermos-looking tubes you stuff your checks etc into and send into the bank.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    13. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A+ to you, sir.

    14. Re:Used in other places, too by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room, from the registers. When there's too much cash in the drawer, you take the excess, stick it in a canister, it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe. I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you're low on change, the back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with, but I've never seen that happen.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    15. Re:Used in other places, too by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I hear they are going to reinstall those pneumatic tube transports by the year 3000.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    16. Re:Used in other places, too by PPH · · Score: 1

      This system also keeps the oxycodone separate fro the armed robbers.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    17. Re:Used in other places, too by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      I like the geek mentality of 'hey, wonder what would happen if I stuff a cat in the New York Pneumatic mail tubes' (If you don't want to read the whole article, He was a little dizzy, but he made it," says Joseph H. Cohen, historian for the New York City Post Office)

    18. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the only place in the US besides Disneyworld to do that. Apparently it works somewhat-not-unlike a packet-switched network, periodically connecting garbage and recycling loads from different places to the appropriate suction via the same set of tubes.

      The area where Expo '98 was held, in Lisbon, Portugal, was later converted to a residential and business zone, and it also has pneumatic Garbage collection in all buildings, with a central collection facility.

    19. Re:Used in other places, too by socsoc · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you experience, but I live in the state capital of a major state (so we have new technology, and even old school like you are referring) and this doesn't happen. A pharmacist still has to sign off on it, so where is the savings?

      Also, bank pneumatic devices stopped being used at least 10 years ago here, both in drive through and locally.

    20. Re:Used in other places, too by socsoc · · Score: 1

      how long has NYC had a private mail force? Or are you referring to USPS?

    21. Re:Used in other places, too by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Where do they still have those? I haven't seen them in over a decade.

    22. Re:Used in other places, too by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah, it was because the propulsion system blew.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    23. Re:Used in other places, too by GKThursday · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Instead, his buddy stood in front of an open pneumatic tube, mesmerized by a 9-foot-long python that had escaped from one of the labs above.

      I would just tell the company that they had upgraded the routing computer using python.

    24. Re:Used in other places, too by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

      New York City does have a fascinating history of pneumatic transport projects. A particularly elaborate example is when New Yorkers were supplied with fresh burritos via pneumatic delivery.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    25. Re:Used in other places, too by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      I see them all over the mid-atlantic (MD, VA). I didn't realize they weren't standard anymore.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    26. Re:Used in other places, too by socsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm mainly on the west coast, perhaps you are correct for your area

    27. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it blew

    28. Re:Used in other places, too by Sporkinum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is not unlike what I remember as a kid at a local department store. They didn't have cash registers, they had a table/desk with a tube endpoint on it. The clerk would take your check/money and a hand written bill and put it in the tube pod. It would shoot up to the 5 floor where the ladies handled the cash. After a short wait, a tube pod would come down with your receipt and any change you were due. It fascinated me and was always a treat to go there. It was also a treat because they had an elevator with dual doors and a guy that ran it.

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    29. Re:Used in other places, too by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      More to the point, what in the hell do they use at YOUR bank? When you drive up to the teller station that doesn't use the drawer (the one built into the bank wall), how does the money get from you to the teller? The ONLY solution I've EVER seen is pneumatic tubes.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    30. Re:Used in other places, too by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've also seen this in every home depot I've ever been in. Although, I'm not sure if they're used anymore. When I was little I used to see them used and get jammed on a regular basis so I suspect they may have stopped using them but don't want to spend the money to remove them.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    31. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm shocked that the first comment didn't contain the phrase 'a series of tubes.' It took six comments to get the something even remotely silly.

    32. Re:Used in other places, too by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would be 'inappropriate suction'.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    33. Re:Used in other places, too by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Thats probably because everytime people go to costco, they spend about $300. You have to expect large bills if you take cash. Ignore the outliers who go to get a $3, pedantic people.

    34. Re:Used in other places, too by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true - we have it in the office where I work right now. Scares the crap out of you every time it starts when you are in the vicinity of it! Of course - my office isn't in the US.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    35. Re:Used in other places, too by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      No problem, it will take care of it - and you too.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    36. Re:Used in other places, too by koollman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course there is. Java's GC sucks too.

    37. Re:Used in other places, too by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      "Honey, call the city... I think they just delivered us garbage instead of our meal"
      "Oh, actually, I just ordered from McDonalds."

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    38. Re:Used in other places, too by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      More to the point, what in the hell do they use at YOUR bank?

      Feet.
      If you drive to the bank at all (and with 20 minutes to find a parking space, then 10 minutes to walk to the bank, why would you?), then you park in the car park (or the nearest one you can find ; few banks have car parks - I can only think of one branch of my main bank that has one, out of 20-odd branches in town) and walk into the branch to do your banking.
      Seriously, a system such as you describe would double or triple the amount of money that the banks have stored up in bricks, mortar and asphalt. Which is not a good use of my money.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    39. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, the first New York City subway was pneumatic. (It was also very short, and short-lived.)

      Could that be because it sucked?

      No! Because it blew!

    40. Re:Used in other places, too by pfleming · · Score: 1

      My Credit Union has them here in AZ

    41. Re:Used in other places, too by pdwalker · · Score: 1

      Nah, it just blew.

    42. Re:Used in other places, too by socsoc · · Score: 1

      They've eliminated drive-ups. Like RockDoctor says, you park and go to an ATM or inside.

    43. Re:Used in other places, too by socsoc · · Score: 1

      That's odd, all the banks in the states have car parks. But then again, everything in the states have parking lots.

    44. Re:Used in other places, too by waerloga01 · · Score: 1

      Hell. My bank has started to replace tellers with tubes inside as well as out.

      So now my bank has zero personal interaction at many branches and excludes change in the tubes, requiring you to use their change machine that takes a percentage.

    45. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Costco in my hometown uses pneumatic tubes to deliver money to the back room, from the registers. When there's too much cash in the drawer, you take the excess, stick it in a canister, it shoots off to be counted and put in the safe. I think if somebody breaks a large bill and you're low on change, the back room could also shoot you a canister of small bills to stock up with, but I've never seen that happen.

      I've seen it happen. Cashiers can request more cash and then the tube shows with more cash. I've only seen it like twice.

    46. Re:Used in other places, too by Noexit · · Score: 1

      Also correct for the Central part of the country as well.

      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

    47. Re:Used in other places, too by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      Drive-up ATMs. Do you really not have those where you live? Every bank here (except in the inner city*) has one ATM on the side of the building adjacent to a driveway. You just drive up, hang your arm out the window and use it. They even converted some of the old tube kind to have a second ATM at the outer lane too.

      This is in California btw.

    48. Re:Used in other places, too by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      That's odd, all the banks in the states have car parks. But then again, everything in the states have parking lots.

      Chicken, meet Egg ; Egg, meet Chicken.
      Countries that have towns and cities where the agricultural hoi polloi had to walk from the village centre out to their fields every day, developed a ring of privately owned properties about an hour's walk out of the centre of the town/ village. Any much greater distance and the hoi polloi would have made pressure to set up a new hamlet/ village/ town/ city in the gap. Even today, with much faster modes of transport, people rarely travel more than an hour each way to their daily work (obviously there are exceptions ; these are averages). That left "foot propelled" countries hemmed in with a network of property obligations that were centuries old at "time immemorial", and each and every one of those property obligations was an encouragement to build within existing property boundaries, because combining ownership of plots is much harder than splitting a plot.
      Some of my acquaintances in my youth were into botanical archaeology (from the botanical and historical ends), and for Central England they used a calibrated rule of thumb that would allow them to estimate the age of a hedgerow to within a century in the time it took to walk a hundred yards of it. They were routinely mapping hedges that follow irregular, nonsensical paths cross-country because of collisions between property ownership boundaries, and which had been in place and nonsensical for 600 or 700 years.

      America (and to a lesser extent, Canada and Australia, I think) are really unusual in the freedom that their "terra nullis" laws have allowed their lords and masters to divide the country with straight lines, to let their cities sprawl, etc. (Of course, you could regard the Norman conquest of Britain as the imposition of a sort of "terra nullis" law too. I may have that legal term named wrongly - they're the laws that boil down to "we own the land now, and no previous claims of ownership are considered important enough to get any argument other than a sword up the jacksie or an air fandango")
      Ultimately, you'll find that America gets hedged in too, and that as land prices go up, parking lots will become too valuable to use just for parking. You'll find more buildings being built with underground or on-roof parking, simply to make double-use of the land. It's the same logic that leads to skyscrapers.
      But everywhere will need to either improve public transport, or become more walking friendly. Personal motorised transport is too inefficient for mass use. (And it's bad for your health too. 20 minutes a day of fast walking does wonders for your heart; not your neighbours heart, but your heart!)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    49. Re:Used in other places, too by v1 · · Score: 1

      They even converted some of the old tube kind to have a second ATM at the outer lane too.

      They've done that here at my bank also. Although most times I go by the bank well after close, even when open I prefer using the ATM to the teller because it's faster and I get a regular store-size receipt instead of an 8.5x11 in duplicate that fits better in the wallet.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    50. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fertile ground for a man-in-the-middle attack

    51. Re:Used in other places, too by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Now get off my lawn!

      And yet people would still pay for that experience. :(

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    52. Re:Used in other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, the first New York City subway was pneumatic. (It was also very short, and short-lived.)

      Could that be because it sucked?

      No, it blew

  7. Ding Ding by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To help alert employees to the arrival of containers, the system has more than three dozen different combinations of chiming tones.

    I wonder which engineer thought that would be a good idea.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Ding Ding by mikael · · Score: 1

      Probably the engineer who played in a rock band in his/her spare time and realized that a one bad note in a tune would be more discernible to somebody working late shift, than something like "The appendectomy/tonsillectomy/lumpectomy biopsy results have just arrived." . Those tunes would probably be as memorable to staff as the chord played in Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Ding Ding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The one who likes tubular bells?

    3. Re:Ding Ding by Vegeta99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      When I was in high school, I quite stereotypically worked at McDonald's. To this day, whenever I eat there, I can tell you EXACTLY what is happening in the kitchen. Someone really paid attention to make sure no function requiring human attention in that kitchen had the same sound.

      Sometimes, if some jerkoff called off and you were stuck back in the kitchen alone, it was MADDENING. You absolutely are more aware of a loud, high pitched beep than a voice telling you to do something

    4. Re:Ding Ding by tomhath · · Score: 1

      I doubt there's a problem with that many combinations. It's probably a sequence of three or four chimes, each of which has a small set of ringtones. E.g. Tissue/Operating Room/Immediate or Blood/Outpatient/Routine. It would be easy to remember the code.

    5. Re:Ding Ding by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 5, Funny

      To help alert employees to the arrival of containers, the system has more than three dozen different combinations of chiming tones.

      bing bing bong bong
      bing bing bong bong
      "Well, Theresa, aren't you going to get that?"
      "Hell no! That's Marty from accounting! He's been trying to contact me ever since he thought I was coming on to him at the Christmas party. As if!"
      "No, that's not Marty. Marty is bing bing bing bong and not bing bing bong bong. That's Bill in IT."
      "Are you sure? I thought Bill's was bing bong bong bing."
      "Nope. You might be confusing that with Jerry which is bong bing bong bingybong."
      "Okay, but only if you're sure."

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    6. Re:Ding Ding by Linuxmonger · · Score: 1

      Maybe the engineer that built the bell systems that alert nurses when a bed call button is pressed.
      It's a form of communication that you get used to and works well, I know a fellow that can talk to one person in English while holding a conversation with another fellow in Morse code. Very cool and rather disconcerting.

    7. Re:Ding Ding by pnevin · · Score: 1

      Or Funkytown

    8. Re:Ding Ding by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      ...more than three dozen different combinations of chiming tones.

      I wonder which engineer thought that would be a good idea.

      You're assuming that a) medical personnel aren't bright enough to learn thirty or forty trivial things that can make their jobs easier in the long run; b) every person who uses the system will hear all of the codes (someone in the blood lab is never going to hear the 'incoming prescription meds' chime); and c) if someone hears a chime pattern that they don't recognize, they can't just look at the tube and see what's waiting.

      I don't think that those are good assumptions.

      Heck, even if you don't know the full chime code, you're still ahead of the game if all of the 'stat' codes have the same loud prefix or suffix.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  8. I can blink pretty quick by Rivalz · · Score: 1

    When are we gonna get that crap for our home network. I need my EBAY crap NOW!

  9. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by garg0yle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How do you figure? How much information is coded in a blood sample, for instance, if you count all the DNA/RNA sequencing? For that matter, how much information can you send if you load up a 16-Gb USB drive (or a few) and send them off in a tube?

    No, the bandwidth here is just fine.

    --
    Modding "-1, Troll" is not a proper response if you disagree with me. Try reason.
  10. Re:I guess the only question is... by dthirteen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think most if not all hospitals have this tech.

    The station(s) go offline, and service personel come and fix it... parts of the network going offline is not an unusual event. Unlike the 19th century tech, these packet (plastic canister) routed pneumatic tube systems lack humans at the core of packet routing.

    From a volunteer's point of view at a non-Stanford hospital, the IT integration was less than stellar. Maybe Stanford has done some work in that area, or maybe this is just astroturfing by a pneumatic tube company.

  11. This must have had the endorsement of.... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Sen. Ted Stevens.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by fm6 · · Score: 0, Troll

      My God! You saw the word "tube" and used it to make fun of Ted Stevens! How creative!

    2. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by EdIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The funny thing to me is why people make fun of him at all. He is not an IT guy. In layman's terms a series of tubes is actually appropriate.

      You can look at a CAT5 cable and a fiber optic cable as being a tube, and information being droplets of water. All of the fiber running across the world is essentially a series of tubes and used to transport these droplets of information from one place to another.

      It is a little more complex than that of course. We have routers and switches which inspect those droplets of information and route them through other tubes, modify them, or just discard them which occurs at layers 2 and 3.

      I don't think it is unreasonable or stupid to liken layer 1 infrastructure to a series of tubes. It's a pretty easy abstraction to construct if you don't have an in-depth understanding of the technology.

    3. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He got points, you didn't. Envy much?

    4. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by Rising+Ape · · Score: 1

      It was more the rest of what he said that was an illustration of ignorance, rather than the "series of tubes" remark itself.

    5. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by socsoc · · Score: 1

      I've been saying this since the beginning, it's how I would also explain "a series of tubes" to the laymen. Thank you Edllll The e-mail part was way off but people mock him for his reference which is apt for really low level explanations.

    6. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by compro01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "not an IT guy" is the point. He was the chairman of the senate committee on commerce, science and transportation. He should have an appropriate grasp of the subjects he is in charge of, which he does not as you can tell from the rest of the speech.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares about the rest of the speech? I am only talking about the series of tubes comment. It's not the whole speech people make fun of, but just that comment.

      Appropriate grasp? Really? Series of tubes seems to me to be an appropriate grasp for a Senator. Unless you are saying that any Senator appointed to that subcommittee has to be an IT person.

      In fact, I would bet that an IT guy might even explain it that way to a Senator if they had asked.

      Instead of saying, "welll.. he is in a position of authority and you know he should like know all this stuff.." you might want to justify how series of tubes is an inappropriate and/or stupid abstraction of layer 1 communications worthy of ridicule.

      If you disagreed with the rest of his speech, just say you don't like the man's politics. Just don't try making fun of him for something that is really not able to made fun of in the first place.

    8. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>In layman's terms a series of tubes is actually appropriate.

      Yeah, it's a good enough analogy.

      The problem was him "getting an internet". Even my 80+ year old grandfather knew better than that.

      Well, he started a computer club at his retirement home, but still.

    9. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      You must be new to democracy.

    10. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prior to his "series of tubes" comment, he referred to an email message as "an internet". He then went on to explain/complain that he received an email message days after it was sent. His reasoning behind why this happened was that the tubes of the internet had become so clogged with garbage that his message took a long time to arrive. The context reveals how terrible the analogy actually is. The best part of the framework of the debate at the time: net neutrality. Eliminating net neutrality would have done nothing to get his email message to him any sooner, since it was a mail relay server problem.

    11. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by mr100percent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, why people make fun of him is when he said in a speech condemning Net Neutrality: "I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the internet commercially."

      Assuming he meant email, is network congestion so bad that it takes a weekend to send an email? More likely he doesn't know how to use a computer properly

    12. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me a tube is just an other name for pipe. "Fat Pipe" has been networking jargon for a long time. I've heard "Long Fat Pipe" used to describe satelite links in TCP tuning discussions.

      The pipe/tube analogy is good at the lower layers, length for latency, width for bandwidth. It even sort of matches in terms of capacity and cost planning. You can lay bigger/extra pipes for more flow/bandwidth or you can install hardware that increases the pressure to get a higher flow/bandwidth if your pipes can support it.

      The analogy starts to break when you start to add intelligence to your pipes. i.e. a water pipe can't tell the difference between my water and yours. From memory his speech was getting into this area so wasn't that great an analogy.

    13. Re:This must have had the endorsement of.... by roscivs · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the rest of the speech? I am only talking about the series of tubes comment. It's not the whole speech people make fun of, but just that comment.

      The use of the phrase "series of tubes" to mock Stevens is just shorthand for referring to the surrounding context of the speech where he made it painfully clear that he had no idea how the Internet worked. Nobody's actually making fun of him for the series of tubes comment itself.

      --
      ~ roscivs
  12. Re:I guess the only question is... by mister_playboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You must be new here.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  13. Beam it over Scotty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    22nd century technology will have it rebuild the sample atom by atom at the destination.....

    1. Re:Beam it over Scotty by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      >22nd century technology will have it rebuild the sample atom by atom at the destination.....

      Why? By the time we have the ability to dis-assemble and re-assemble tissue samples (for example), we'll be able to put a mini-lab close to the patient care providers. Instead of tubing a tissue sample across campus for analysis, the nurse will just pop the sample into the nearest mini-lab and press the button for "Analyze". It'll be just like "CSI:Miami" at every nurses' station.

    2. Re:Beam it over Scotty by PPH · · Score: 1

      press the button for "Analyze". It'll be just like "CSI:Miami" at every nurses' station.

      It'll still be like Star Trek:

      McCoy: "He's dead, Jim."

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Big supermarkets have them here. by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the register has too much cash or needs change they just tube it over. There's also at least one pharmacy which has people processing prescriptions at terminals, and storage below from where the drugs are tubed over. If it works, don't fix it I say.

    Oh, and here = Helsinki, Finland.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by hduff · · Score: 1

      If it works, don't fix it I say.

      Oh, and here = Helsinki, Finland.

      Fix it until it breaks.

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    2. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by zlogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But what if someone hacks the system, do something like a man-in-the-middle attack and starts intercepting money transactions?

    3. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950's/1960's . There were no electronic cash registers, and checkout staff weren't allowed to handle money. So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule. This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk. Just like in the movie "Brazil".

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah they use them here in Melbourne, Australia. Makes be wonder if you could knock one up with bits from the hardware store. The pipes are easy 90mm stormwater and 100mm sewage are both available. If we go with the cheap 90mm pipe then 70mm pipe could be used for a capsule. Sealing the outside and making it reliable might be a problem. You could experiment with O rings (not for use in cold weather!) with manual lubrication using sump oil.

      You would need a low pressure electric pump. Should be a few available off the shelf. Maybe I could rework my front letterbox. Saves one trip out of the house every day.

    5. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a large supermarket chain in the United States Midwest region, and many of our stores own an associated gas station out on the edge of the parking lot. The gas stations do not have their own safe or money storage; instead, gas station clerks send and receive money from the main store safe via pneumatic tube.

      Unlike hospitals or pharmacies, though, our pneumatic tubes go outside the store and underneath the parking lot. I have heard of incidents where the underground tube will cave in or otherwise become blocked, and they'll have to dig up the parking lot to get the lost tube back. I was speaking with a member of our company's IT staff recently, who told me that over the years of building the tubes, the company has discovered that the tubes built under the parking lot in the winter generally fail more frequently than the tubes built in the summer.

      In fact, the company has recently abandoned the pneumatic tube in favor of giving new gas stations their own safe and cash deposit system - and stores that experience a tube failure are getting a new safe put in instead of getting their tube repaired. I often wonder what happens if (when?) our pneumatic tube fails. Our tube typically carries around $500 at a time underneath the parking lot. If we lose a tube with money underneath the parking lot and are then destined to receive a new safe out at our gas station, will they bother to dig it up? Or will they just say that rescuing that $500 tube is not worth the cost of digging up the parking lot, and leave the cash to rot away?

    6. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you have a lot of small objects (pills, cash, whatever), pneumatic tubes are great. But Stanford Hospital is using them to manage data.

      Handwritten medical words add to costs, mistakes (as in people dying), and miscommunication. That's why the U.S. needs an electronic medical record system. I believe Finland already has one.

      Stanford has just added a little speed to an obsolete system. Rather sad for a school that has played such a big role in the development of information technology.

    7. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by maxume · · Score: 4, Funny

      You stop letting them spend all day in the basement.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, there was a fabric/clothing store in town that had a system of cables and baskets that served the same function. I was always fascinated how the clerks would drop the money and receipt into a metal box attached to the basket, yank a cord and send the basket on a wire up to the high ceiling where the basket would be picked up by a continuously moving chain and sent to the back of the store. A minute later, the basket would return with the change and be dropped off at the counter, sliding down a wire to the clerk. By the time I was old enough to be able to figure out how it worked, it had been removed and the ceiling lowered to save energy.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    9. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by I_am_Jack · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the blower from a vacuum cleaner at a car wash would be more than enough to power a 100mm dia. (4" in the US, which is a standard tube size here for pneumatic tube systems) point-to-point line, and you could move the carrier several hundred meters with a payload up up to a half kilo. You could use ABS sewage line. The problem is how you would create bends and offsets. The smallest radius for a standard size carrier in a 100mm dia. tube is 60cm. Sealing the system is really not much of an issue. And if you use a piece of 70mm pipe, you'd need to wrap the outside with the fuzzy velcro strips at equadistant points to make your seal in order to allow the pressure/vacuum to propel the carrier. I used to sell the big systems to hospitals for a living.

    10. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by donatzsky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you actually RTFA? Sure, they send documents (might as well when they have the system), but what they're raving about in TFA is that they can send tissue samples and other bits and pieces of their patients.

    11. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest problem would be finding a way to reliably make those large-radius bends. Most buildings that have pneumatic systems installed usually have the "kinks" (pun intended) that have to be worked out by the installer before you end up with a reliable system.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    12. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, jackass, read the damn article. They're using them to send LAB SAMPLES around the giant hospital. Not paper.

    13. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Did you actually RTFA? Sure, they send documents (might as well when they have the system), but what they're raving about in TFA is that they can send tissue samples and other bits and pieces of their patients.

      They obviously didn't make the tubes large enough to send their patients as a whole, so they have to resort to sending them in bits and pieces. I wonder how long they need to put them back together on the receiving side ...
      SCNR

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      If you used to sell them, could you tell us what companies make them?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    15. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nearly all the department stores did that back in the 1950's/1960's . There were no electronic cash registers, and checkout staff weren't allowed to handle money. So the customer would place their payment along with a receipt signed by the checkout clerk into a capsule. This would be sent upstairs to be processed by an accountant who would send the change back down to the checkout clerk.

      Costco stores, at least here in the SF bay area, have been using tubes to move money around for years. The only difference is that they now use PVC tubes, instead of the metal ones I remember from the 40s and 50s.

      I don't recall how they were used back then as I was too young.

      When I worked for a major railroad in the 60s, they had an elaborate tube system which went to a hub in the mail department. There was a long, carpet-lined trough that all the tubes dumped into. There was a collar on the canister that was rotated to show the destination floor. A clerk would pick up the incoming canister, look at the indicated floor marking, then pop it into the outgoing tube for the destination floor.

      Eventually this was replaced by a system in an an abandoned elevator shaft. There was a moving chain going up the shaft, over the top, then down again in a continuous loop. You put building mail into a bin destined for the mail room and pushed it out on rails to be picked up by grabbers on the chain. The bin was dumped into the mail room. After sorting, mail for different floors was put into bins with a floor indicator set on it and sent back onto the chain. Eventually it was kicked off the chain onto a ramp at the designated floor.

    16. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You're right. I didn't RTFA. My bad. But you'll notice that the editor (or whoever wrote the headline) didn't either.

    17. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm maybe you could send spherical packages down the tube (literally, balls) and use normal pipe junctions. Then you could control air movement for routing. I can't think of a good application with such inconvenient shapes but how about a fast food joint....
       
      Order at your table with a cheap touch screen. Shove cash into a ball, your change comes back the same way, or pay by CC though the UI. Everything on the menu fits into a ball. Used balls go back through a dedicated garbage tube which goes straight to a cleaning machine. There is no other packaging.

    18. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by socsoc · · Score: 1

      It'll cost more than $500 to dig it up, and repave so it's probably a lost cause. That's pretty foresighted.

    19. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Really? Where in Melbourne? I lived in the CBD for a while and never saw one.

    20. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by CGordy · · Score: 1

      Small radius bends are widely used because they're compact to transport and install and easy to fit together - the absence of large radius bends is due to a lack of mainstream demand more than any difficulty in making them.

      Pneumatic conveying is widely used in the petrochemical industry for powder and pelletised products. It's relatively easy to get right, provided that the operator willing to spend the time and money to calculate the hydraulics properly, which requires quite a few hours of (expensive) engineering time. That's not an issue in an industry when a product line blockage can result in $10M of lost revenue per day (ballpark figure), but for a building it's cheaper to bash a hole in the wall and stick a larger pipe in.

    21. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      This i why I like slashdot. Eventually someone will give a simple step-by-step method to do something which requires some intelligence and a bit of googling for definitions and parts. If only we had a way to mark the important remarks and stuff the jibber-jabber.

    22. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by wilec · · Score: 1

      Hello "I am Jack"

      I are Matt, I think we have worked together on these things before.

      wilec

      matthew@hypersynergy.com

    23. Re:Big supermarkets have them here. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I have definitely seen them in (possibly) older suburban supermarkets. Next time I go I will pay attention. Maybe they were decommissioned, not sure.

  15. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can fit a couple of DDS-4 tapes in a standard pneumatic cartridge. That's 80GB of data, giving you somewhere in the region of 60GB/s

  16. Gotta wonder which is worse ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having to blow into a tube or suck on one?

  17. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For that matter, how much information can you send if you load up a 16-Gb USB drive (or a few) and send them off in a tube?

    You have a last mile (or last metre) problem there though. Getting the data through the tube will take seconds. Minutes at most. 16GB through USB2 will take a few minutes even if you actually do get the maximum theoretical throughput.

  18. Futurama by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    I look forward to the day when humans can be transported through these tubes as in Futurama.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    1. Re:Futurama by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Sounds pretty simple. You just need slightly bigger tubes.

    2. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It could have happened...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beach_Pneumatic_Transit

    3. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course that idea was predated by countless previous sci-fi sources ... including the Jetsons and even Dune.

    4. Re:Futurama by ickleberry · · Score: 1

      Also one James Bond movie (cant remember the name) where someguy was put in a capsule with an oxygen flask and smuggled out of the country through an oil pipeline

    5. Re:Futurama by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      They have actually ran this in a few places around the world. Some even working on subway scale... I believe NY had a tube subway. It is unsurprisingly uncosteffective and unreliable.

    6. Re:Futurama by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I look forward to the day when various documents can be transported through these tubes, also as in Futurama.

      Hermes: It's supposed to be about the filing!

    7. Re:Futurama by gnud · · Score: 1

      He forgot to mention 'Alive and unspoiled'.

    8. Re:Futurama by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I saw a program a while ago that talked about a idea to build a pneumatic tube underwater between NYC and London, and send passenger cars between them at up to 5000 mph, for a 45-minute total trip time.

    9. Re:Futurama by Chess+Piece+Face · · Score: 1

      Someone recquisition me a groove!

    10. Re:Futurama by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Not pneumatic.... thatd be a maglev train... in a vacuum sealed tube

    11. Re:Futurama by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, sorry about that. But the vacuum-sealed tube part is similar to pneumatics in a way, as it deals with sealing the tube to air and controlling any air entering or exiting; it's just negative pressure instead of positive pressure.

  19. whats the bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if each capsule was packed with 16gb microSD cards ?

    1. Re:whats the bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many libraries of congress is it?

    2. Re:whats the bandwidth by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's high bandwidth high latency. So in theory, you could place two 640GB notebook drives in the tube for a total of 1.28TB of data. Now lets assume that it takes 10 seconds for the tube to travel from start to finish. That would put the transfer rate at 128GB as second.

      Basically, it's like sneaker-net but faster :)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:whats the bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on the delivery speed. Giving that a variable 'd' as time in seconds, then your bandwidth for a single card is 16 gb/d seconds. You might be able to pipeline these, so that would then depend on how fast the microSD cards could be loaded into the system. Depending on the system, the transport pods might remain in the pipes, or they might have to be inserted. Giving the loading time a variable 'l' as time in seconds, and 'n' is the number of pods you have available, then the time for one sending one card in a pod is l+d seconds. But if you have more than one microSD card and pods, then you save time by loading in subsequent pods while waiting for the previous one to be delivered.

      These types of calculation are common for estimating the performance of pipelined and parallel processing.

  20. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by noidentity · · Score: 5, Funny

    Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communication: The bandwidth sucks.

    How do you figure? How much information is coded in a blood sample, for instance, if you count all the DNA/RNA sequencing? For that matter, how much information can you send if you load up a 16-Gb USB drive (or a few) and send them off in a tube?

    No, the bandwidth here is just fine.

    There has never been a more appropriate time for this response: WHOOSH! (as the parcel goes by in the tube)

  21. Re:I guess the only question is... by LarryWake · · Score: 1

    This was an article in the medical center's newsletter, so I think its purpose was more likely a profile of one of their internal services and the people behind it.

    If it was a plant by a pneumatic tube company it was an epic fail, because one notably missing datum was the name of the vendor.

  22. I bet they use fire too by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

    Why is this news? Seriously, old technology lives on if it's useful. Even sometimes if it's not.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:I bet they use fire too by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is this news? Seriously, old technology lives on if it's useful. Even sometimes if it's not.

      I think the newsworthiness of this is that it offers evidence of a technological "plus ca change ..." Put another way, instead of looking like Star Trek or a Spielberg movie, the future will more likely resemble what we see in Brazil.

  23. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah - but keep in mind that I/O on USB tops out at 480Mbit. Halve that, because (unlike networking), reading (receiving) and writing (sending) can't be done simultaneously - so 240Mbit. Gigabit is already beating it* - even before you add the overhead (however long it takes to; eject the device, remove it, put it in the capsule, type in the right send location / find the right tube, wait for actual transit time, get it out of the capsule, plug it in, mount it/open folder, start copy/move dialogue). It may be worth it for a sub-par network given some threshold of data, but in those cases, it's more practical to just install a decent network in the first place.

    * Most "gigabit" connections don't live up to their names - but then again, I've yet to see a USB key read/write at 480Mbit/s.

  24. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by red_pete · · Score: 1

    Wooooosh!!!

  25. Pneumatic tubes used to be big in the 19th century by Bender_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both Berlin and Paris had a networks with a total length of more than 400km.

    obvious link

  26. "The tube is everywhere" by ben_kelley · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new tubular overlords.

    1. Re:"The tube is everywhere" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our new tubular overlords.

      ...and I am right behind you with Tubular Bells on.

    2. Re:"The tube is everywhere" by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new tubular overlords.

      ...and I am right behind you with Tubular Bells on.

      Dude, that is totally tubular.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  27. Ancient transportation technology is better by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Ancient transportation technology is better

    1. Re:Ancient transportation technology is better by friedo · · Score: 1

      You mean like a Stargate?

    2. Re:Ancient transportation technology is better by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Yes but the shorter range transportation system as well.

  28. Re:I guess the only question is... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    TFA doesn't answer the questions at all... it just says no cylinder has ever gotten stuck in a tube, ... It’s also a work in constant progress

    Without any mention of any way of dealing with a stuck cylinder.

    Perhaps it just has to happen once, an important tube getting disabled by a stuck object... for there to be a catastrophe... (and no couriers available to fall back on)

  29. Fluff piece, sorta by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I found the article mildly interesting but the lack of details disappointing. They only mention things like switching points and waiting areas in passing. It would've been a great article if they'd talked about the specific tech - I know it's old tech, but most of us have had little to no exposure to it (I've been to banks that use it at their drive-through windows... that's about it). For example: there are switches; is there any sort of prioritization protocol, or are the switches simply for collision prevention?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Fluff piece, sorta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Packet collision can be spectacular to witness. Visual and audio feedback is intrinsic to the system design, and instantly tells anyone nearby when a packet collision has happened. It works without the need of special tube-monitoring software or display devices.

      Unfortunately, the retry protocol is expensive and often involves shutting down the network for extended periods of time.

    2. Re:Fluff piece, sorta by wilec · · Score: 1

      There are in our system for instance, inter zone pipes and rotary mechanical transfer units that act as multi mode staging units or switches, these systems are also capable of using zoning and inter/intra zone processes to allow for parallel operations. Priority management is controlled by several factors/settings for system wide and individual device/object/transaction level control.

      I have had daily experience with a 30 something station, two zone and about two dozen transfer unit system for twenty something years. Our system is a SWISSLOGIC mid 90's tech with a low power PC running a DOS application on a RS-422 network. The DOS app runs under an OS/2 VDM or DOS, the newer versions are of course Windows applications. Even so uptime for the system is very good (99%+), but not perfect, occasional sensor or mechanical routing/delivery components can cause hard to resolve failures. Most problems (80%+) however are user related, non latched or inappropriately or overfilled carriers being the most common. Still the system processes about a million transactions a year 24/7/365 mostly unattended. If it fails it gets the attention of the staff before anything else except maybe HVAC, which is my primary area of responsibility of course.

      matthew

  30. See... tubes are used more than we thought by mysidia · · Score: 1
  31. NASA Mission Control does too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA Mission Control does too.

    They also use "Mr. Hand."

  32. Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by AndyGasman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They are pretty common in the UK, in all sort of industries.

    Tesco supermarket uses them in some stores for moving cash to tills, and they are widely used in Hospitals.

    There is one great, if slightly lengthy story that a friend tells, from when she was working in a hospital in Western Scotland a few years ago, I'll try to recount it best as I can.

    A patient who has Hepatitis and Epilepsy is admitted to the hospital, he had a fit, and his Dog bit his ear off while he was fitting. So he came to hospital with his ear in his pocket. He was treated in A&E (UK ER) and sent up to the surgical department. His Ear though was wrapped up and put in a tube, however before the doctor could tap in the destination, the pod whizzed off. The hepatitis positive ear was not found for several days (is this just a bit error rate?), as it was quiet a big hospital with a lot of tubes. It could have been worse, as the ear was not intended to be sown back on, but just photographed and incinerated. The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Dave before the incident, but I'm sure this didn't help him shake of the moniker. The worst thing is, most people just ask what happened to the dog.

    You don't get that with TCP/IP

    1. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Something in common with the Transporter from Star Trek, then. Transfers matter over long distances and sometimes you get someone else's random appendage arriving in your office for no reason.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I want to loose an ear? My ears are quite alright without being set free.

    3. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      This is a cool story and all, and I hate to be a buzz kill, but you can still lose things with people carting them around manually. It's not like everybody knows at all times the locations of everything they've handled that day.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That story was quite earie.

    5. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

      Sure you do. The only difference is that with TCP/IP, you have to cut another ear off once you realize the first one was lost.

    6. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      The worst thing is, most people just ask what happened to the dog.

      I'm surprised it fit in the tube.

    7. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know doctors are normal people, but

      The doctor who put the ear in the pod was known as Stupid Dave

      is a scary thought.

    8. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by Stray7Xi · · Score: 2, Funny

      The worst thing is, most people just ask what happened to the dog.

      I'm surprised it fit in the tube.

      Networking 101: fragmentation

    9. Re:Common in the UK, good way to loose an ear by autophile · · Score: 1

      So... um.... what uh... what happened to the dog?

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
  33. Re:I guess the only question is... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Maybe not a fail.. there can't be that many manufacturers of pneumatic tube systems, who are willing and able to take on the added liability and certification requirements to put their equipment in hospitals, and have it serve a critical function.

    Pneumatic tube systems are very expensive. If a hospital is considering having one built, the management will be having a lot of research done, to reach the right decisions.

    If other potential buyers of pneumatic tube systems for hospitals read the article and are interested.... they're very likely to make contacts, to get more information about their system, including contact with the vendor.

    Otherwise known as: spread information by word of mouth, so it doesn't seem like they are "pushing" a product, or spouting advertising / marketing illusions, but use an article to get people talking about the subject.

  34. dont want to start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it like a series of tubes?

    1. Re:dont want to start here by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. The internet is a series of tubes, and this pneumatic tube communication system is like a convoy of trucks on the highway.

      And yes, the convoy of trucks is now connected via Wi-Fi, so these trucks are like the internet.

    2. Re:dont want to start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Than you shouldn't have. That weak attempt at an obvious joke has already been taken in this article. Try something less unoriginal next time.

  35. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    i'm fairly sure it doesn't: it would most probaby be possible to feed 3.5" or at least 2.5" HDs down these tube. Every few seconds.

    the latency certainly, though.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  36. potential for paltry puns by maiki · · Score: 1
    My hobby: looking for opportunities to use low-frequency adjectives in bad puns:
    • That's a tubular pneumatic delivery system, man!
    • Dude, that's a wicked candle!
    • That flipping gymnast from China won gold.
  37. all major australian supermarkets do too by iamagloworm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in australia coles and woolworths as well as target and big w, etc. all use pneumatic tubs for cash.

  38. also functions as as hort range time machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    at the hospital at which I worked, you could select the origin station as the destination, and the tube system would dutifully take the carrier all the way around and back. so you could send yourself something, and receive it a few minutes later. I loved sending stuff to myself in the (near) future.

  39. Re:I guess the only question is... by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

    actually some pneumatic tube systems have procedures for a stuck cylinder, by sending a second heavier cylinder, or by increasing the pressure to higher than normal levels, either way clearing the tube.

    --
    All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
  40. Re:What they do... by symbolic · · Score: 1

    It has been a while, but from what I can remember -

    If something gets stuck or really fouled up, they shut off the system, force air through it backward, and empty the system (channel by channel). From what I could tell, this is usually enough to clear any obstructions, but it does take some time depending on how big the system is.

    If something contaminates the system (like a spilled or ruptured sample), they send a special container through that contains a liquid agent (bleach + water, or some other disinfectant), which renders the spilled contents inert.

    The plastic containers they use are pretty sturdy, and if I recall, the containers are reinforced at each end. They don't move *that* fast through the system, so it's not like one container could literally destroy another simply from impact.

  41. Re:Pneumatic tubes used to be big in the 19th cent by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the Paris system lasted until 1973.

  42. Unless it is faster to walk... by yakatz · · Score: 1

    At a hospital in the Washington, DC area which uses this system, a friend of mine needed a baby-anti-theft bracelet from the next nurses station. It took 12 minutes to get there through the tube system, in which time someone could have walked over and gotten it 6+ times

    1. Re:Unless it is faster to walk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      baby-anti-theft bracelet

      you have to protect yourselves against thieving babies? in a hospital of all places?
      Man you guys need to sort out your healthcare system...

    2. Re:Unless it is faster to walk... by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Well, it was in Washington DC. Probably a politician's baby.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  43. I want McDonald's by tube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know its nice to see this technology used for something other than a stupid bank. I'd love to see this used for fast food. I could deff see McDonald's, Burger King, and/or Taco Bell easily fitting into an over-sized tube and making it to the house in a jiff. I don't know how well pizza would work unless its like a pizza sub. As far as drinks are concerned I'd think that they would come up with some method to keep drinks from spilling, ie: develop a new type of cup.

    1. Re:I want McDonald's by tube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as drinks are concerned I'd think that they would come up with some method to keep drinks from spilling, ie: develop a new type of cup.

      Or, you know, bottles.

  44. More breaking news! by pajamapaati · · Score: 1
    • carriage runs on iron tracks, pulled by locomotive vehicle!
    • horseless carriage transports people at over 30 miles an hour!!
    • heavier-than-air vehicle flies through air!!!
    • houses and even whole streets illuminated by globes powered by "electricity"!!!!
    • human voice made audible at a distance over copper wires!!!!!
    • ... etc ...
    1. Re:More breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you need any of this shit when you could just use the internet?

      - fractoid-with-mod-points

  45. Re:I guess the only question is... by Discordantus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (and no couriers available to fall back on)

    Luckily, they have plenty of *general purpose* organic units to fall back on, which, while less efficient than the tube network, can quickly transport the physical objects. Just because no one has "courier" in their job description, doesn't mean there are no available couriers.

  46. Re:I guess the only question is... by Seedy2 · · Score: 1

    What happens when something goes wrong?

    Tubes get clogged... (lack of QoS)

    Capsule is damaged before being inserted in tube

    Capsule gets stuck...

    Breaking fails, sample gets smashed..

    Tubes get contaminated.

    Critical sample gets stuck, or destroyed....

    As someone who worked in a place that had a pneumatic system for transporting blood that they used for decades I can say a few things. :)
    Never heard of a clog, it was a two station system. One opening at each end. I supposed the ones that branch would have more clogs/stuckies.
    The most likely failure was a blood bag or tube bursting on arrival, usually do to over pressure making capsule go too fast.
    That only contaminates the one end, huge mess but the whole tube system isn't contaminated.
    Critical samples sometimes get lost broken or whatever when they are handled by people, the pneumatic system really doesn't affect the odds of it happening.
    So would say it decreases the odds.
    Since the blood bank was on one side of the street and the hospital was on the other, the tube meant the people didn't have to cross the street with samples or bags.

    --
    Nothing to say here... move along
  47. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by xs650 · · Score: 1

    That had whooshed right over my head too, it sucks when that happens.

  48. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by igny · · Score: 1

    The bandwidth sucks.

    And the more it sucks the better it is.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  49. Very good but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When my youngest brother was born, about 5 years ago, the hospital had "anti-theft" anklets on the babies. When my brother's fell off, it took over half an hour to get one from the nurses station at the end of the hall by tube, when someone could have walked there and gotten it by hand in 45 seconds.

    The system is only helpful if people DON'T become dependent on it.

  50. Marvelous by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    Do you suppose they got the idea from the drive-through prescription lane at Walgreen's?

    rj

  51. I just the other day got by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    A sample was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday. I got it yesterday. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things.

  52. Fastest Sytem of All by b4upoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Place a stack of DVDs in a pneumatic device and you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery.

    1. Re: Fastest Sytem of All by BetterSense · · Score: 1

      Burning all those DVDS, and reading them back, would be the bottleneck. Might as well stuff TB hdd's in there.

    2. Re: Fastest Sytem of All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Firing them from a cannon would be faster.

    3. Re: Fastest Sytem of All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that these tube systems are about 100mm in diameter, and a DVD is more like 120mm.

      Just be sure to bend your DVDs in half and they will fit! :D

    4. Re: Fastest Sytem of All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but how far?

    5. Re: Fastest Sytem of All by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      you can pump data faster than on any type of existing system of delivery.

      yeah, but the latency is a bitch.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re: Fastest Sytem of All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, faster than a stack of Bluerays in a tube?

  53. Pub use by slim · · Score: 1

    The Red Lion in Hunningham, Warwickshire, uses pneumatic tubes to shuttle food orders to the kitchen (the order, not the food). The tubes are transparent and take a slightly convoluted route, so it's fun to watch.

    What you wouldn't expect from that, is that it's a reasonably traditional country pub in most respects...

  54. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

    On the contrary, it blows.

  55. good efficiency... by normaldotcom · · Score: 1

    Pneumatic tubes are a bit more reliable than sample-carrying robots that are being produced for the same purpose. What's more likely to fail, a robot that autonomously navigates a hospital, avoiding humans with ultrasonic sensors, or a simple time-tested pneumatic tube system?

  56. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by ascari · · Score: 1

    No, actually I think they use some kind of pump to achieve the suction. :)

  57. Re:I guess the only question is... by shogun · · Score: 4, Funny

    actually some pneumatic tube systems have procedures for a stuck cylinder, by sending a second heavier cylinder, or by increasing the pressure to higher than normal levels, either way clearing the tube.

    as in Futurama: Governor lady said "I'm sending in more trains!"

  58. Broken promises by ascari · · Score: 1

    They promised us high speed communication via carbon nanotubes - and this is what we got. Just like that flying car they promised. :)

  59. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by Cwix · · Score: 1
    quit being pedantic

    how about a esata hard drive then? better?

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  60. 19th-century technology by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If it works, why replace it?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:19th-century technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you a sys admin ?

      -- an agile (I do project for small business and I am solo) developer

  61. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used such tubes all day, every day, for several years, doing Neutron Activation Analysis. The samples were loaded three per tube, known as rabbits. They went into the slot, closed and blew down the outside wall of the building, underground, and then up into the core of our TRIGA reactor. There they got neutrons of various energies for anywhere from 0.05 to 2-3 seconds, and then they blasted back to me. Behind the shields I removed the samples and placed them at the gamma detectors--moving very fast. Counting gammas took anywhere from seconds to days, depending upon type and elements.

    We proved the existence of the Northern Hemisphere ozone depletion with 800 samples, and several of my graduates got PhDs. Another project showed trade routes extant through northern Italy at the construction of the Colliseum.

    Once in a while a rabbit would get stuck. A particularly hot one did, right at the corner of my lab. We timed that test so no one else was in the building, and it got so hot it wouldn't come back past the tube joint. If I hadn't known just where the 36" wrench was, the building could have been badly contaminated, and would've shut down, as in national news. I got it out without too much exposure, and was offered the job as building manager later.

    Another time a sample exploded while removing it from a rabbit, showering my nose with hot dust. I still get stray hairs growing there...

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      sector 7g?

    2. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stray hares?

    3. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gordon, is that you?

    4. Re:Anonymous Coward by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      Irradiation by epithermal neutrons was performed using the pneumatic facility of the Triga Reactor, at the University of Texas at Austin, for all the samples.

      From: Halogen determination in Arctic aerosols by neutron activation analysis with...

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
  62. wow, 18 miles per hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the internet can certainly not match that!!!

  63. Very common in all hospitals by neapolitan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought the headline of the article was actually a joke; these systems are found in almost all major hospitals. There are companies that will install them:

    http://www.swisslog.com/index/hcs-index/hcs-systems/hcs-pts/hcs-pts-translogic.htm

    this is an established industry, and nothing new... Each hospital in the conglomerate that I work in uses a pneumatic tube system.

    Weird that somebody picked up this Stanford "press release" and found it suitable for Slashdot...

    --
    Slashdotter, ID #101. UIDs are in binary, right?
    1. Re:Very common in all hospitals by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      Is the pneumatic hospital idea more prevalent on one continent over another? Many /.ers fail to provide location cues.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. Would be interesting for home plumbing by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing. For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?

    Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water, and taking away waste water? (You'd have separate containers, of course, for fresh water and waste water).

    You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network. For instance, it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank, and then from there to the toilets for flushing.

    And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.

    1. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WTF???? That makes no sense at all

    2. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by scottv67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing. For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?

      Are you fucking high?

      >Note that the same tubes could be used for delivering hot water an cold water, and taking away waste water? (You'd have separate containers, of course, for fresh water and waste water).

      Are you fucking high?

      >You could do cool things with a pneumatic packet-switched water network. For instance, it would be easy to add a storage tank and route shower waster water to the tank, and then from there to the toilets for flushing.

      Are you fucking high?

      >And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.

      Seriously, are you fucking high?

    3. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by mr_matticus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why not? Possibly because of the following:

      1) The energy required to transport "packets" of hot water is many, many times greater than the losses through the hot water pipes.

      2) The cost of building such a system would exceed any logical benefit; adding a large-diameter pipe system would occupy considerable space and would require some (presumably mechanized) system for sorting, draining, and filling the containers (as well as isolating waste water containers from the others) in a space-consuming "sorting room".

      3) Each shower, sink, and drain in the building would require a large accumulation tank, since it would take multiple "packets" to flush a toilet, and storing enough hot water for even a brief shower would require many, many trips through the system. Any drain reservoir that filled faster than the system could empty it would back up into the sink/toilet/bathtub. The largest conceivable container to fit into a typical building could hold about a gallon of water and would be twice the size of the system used at banks--it certainly wouldn't fit inside a standard wall and would require a special breakout conduit.

      4) For home use, building a sufficiently complex system would simply be impossible--all water flow would stop while your "packets" were en route to other destinations. There is no conceivable way to build bypass structures and waiting areas sufficient to allow multiple taps to work simultaneously at an acceptable refill rate.

      5) Given the necessary locations for most of the accumulation tanks, you would need active pumps to run most faucets--the system would not function on water pressure alone as it does now. This adds cost, complexity, and new failure modes. Power outage? There goes the toilets.

      The whole idea is a Rube. If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you, build a home with insulated hot water pipes. Add a central vac if you like. The end result will be cheaper, more efficient, and 99% less insane.

    4. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      And I bet with some clever design, you could make it so the pneumatic tube system could double as a centralized vacuum system for house cleaning.

      You will not be surprised to find you can purchase one for your home.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    5. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by PPH · · Score: 1

      Evidently this guy hasn't seen Harry Tuttle at work.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

      I'm putting my money on high except for the last one. Wikipediate "Central Vacuum System".

    7. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      >I'm putting my money on high except for the last one. Wikipediate "Central Vacuum System".

      I agree. I've seen houses with "Central Vacuum." But the OP wanted a tube system that could carry both "packets of water" as well as dust bunnies. Somehow I don't think the two would mix well.

    8. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by marciot · · Score: 1

      I've occasionally thought it would be interesting to use this kind of technology for home plumbing. For example, when you turn on your sink and ask for hot water, instead of having a continuous flow in a pipe from the hot water heater to the sink (which wastes a lot of energy), why not use a pneumatic tube system to deliver a packet of hot water to the sink?

      Are you fucking high?
       

      I'm sure they said the same thing to the fellow who thought packet switching was better than circuit switching for a global comminications network. Maybe this guy is on to something. In addition to hot and cold water, you could get your mail delivered at the tap, along with beer, spirits or whiskey. All at the push of a button, through the magic of packet switching. Not such a crazy idea when you think about it.

    9. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by Titoxd · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. I must have pulled something laughing at this...

    10. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by sych · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that buffer underruns would be inconvenient... and overruns could get downright nasty :)

    11. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      A better bet is point-of-use heating. When my wife and I were planning the remodel of our kitchen, we decided to install an "instant hot" device to allow her to quickly and easily make tea. It's a one-gallon storage tank/heater that's located in the cupboard under the sink and has a separate faucet on the counter. It dispenses near-boiling water on demand, which means it only takes as long to make a cup of tea as it takes the tea to steep. It's also useful in a lot of other situations--when making dinners for our three year old for instance--it takes about a minute for the stove to boil the pre-heated water for macaroni and cheese :-)

      While the heat loss through the pipes is negligible, it was worth it to us to install the device because it means not running water down the drain while waiting for it to get hot, and not waiting for the kettle to boil when making tea

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    12. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that plumbing already essentially IS a "pneumatic" tube system. It just happens that the payload and the propellant are the same thing.

    13. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If the relatively small losses in the hot water pipes concern you, build a home with insulated hot water pipes.

      My idea for hot water in a custom-built house is this:

      1) insulate all the hot-water pipes (seriously, the foam pipe insulation costs pennies per foot; it's ridiculous that the cheap-ass builders don't already insulate all the pipes).

      2) install a solar hot water system, which heats water in the tank (80 or 120 gallon) only using heat gained from panels on the roof. Don't use any other heat source for the tank.

      3) put flash heaters in each room that needs hot water (each bathroom, and kitchen). These instantly heat the water as it flows through. This will eliminate the several-minute wait time for hot water when you turn on the shower, but you'll also save energy because when the hot water from the solar-heated tank finally arrives, the flash heater (with its thermostat) will stop heating the water so much.

      It would cost more, obviously, but this seems like the most energy-efficient way to get hot water while also having the convenience of instant hot water.

    14. Re:Would be interesting for home plumbing by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      He lost the plot when he decided to use the things we currently use to carry hot and cold fluids, pipes, which work very efficiently for that task, and replace it with a vacuum tube system for the same items in a container at far less efficiency and far more needless expense.

      Some ideas are dismissed as stupid despite being visionary. This one is dismissed as stupid because it's stupid.

      It's also a joke and it flew RIGHT OVER YOUR HEAD. ;)

  66. Goading transporter development by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this is just meant to poke fun at the serious scientists that are feverishly working on transporter technology so physical items can be moved instantaneously from point A to point B...unless of course, you are traveling at warp speed at present.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  67. oh yeah? got that beat... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    Every day, I get to work using 10,000 year old technology that the internet hasn't replaced yet - the wheel. I first read about the internet using a 5500 year old invention (paper) that is still in extremely prolific use today.

    What? Huh? There are hundreds of thousands of inventions that are in use at that hospital every minute of every day, that didn't get replaced by the internet. Why single out this one? Is it because, like the internet, this too is a series of tubes?"

  68. paraphrase by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a pneumatic tube shuttle full of thumbdrives.

    --
    Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    1. Re:paraphrase by el_tedward · · Score: 1

      What about my pneumatic tube filled with (carefully stacked) 32gb microsd cards? I didn't bother counting how many I put in, but I betcha' I got better bandwidth than you!

    2. Re:paraphrase by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      Pffft, sure if you want to be all logical and stuff. But will your microsd card be shaped like Darth Vader?

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    3. Re:paraphrase by el_tedward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, whatevs dude. I can still fit more copies of star wars in HD in my tubes than you can.

      'nuff said

  69. In use in most hospitals by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

    They use them at Sewickley Valley Hospital in PA to send stuff around the Lab area on the 6th floor, and to send samples from the 2nd floor upstairs.

    People love it. It's worth every penny.

  70. Re:What they do... by jbengt · · Score: 1

    They don't move *that* fast through the system, so it's not like one container could literally destroy another simply from impact.

    According to TFA, this system moves the containers at 25 FPS, which is about 17 mph.
    That should be enough to cause some damage, except, being a pneumatic system, the collision would be softened by a a cushion of air between the objects.

  71. Re:I guess the only question is... by uncqual · · Score: 1

    Since the blood bank was on one side of the street and the hospital was on the other, the tube meant the people didn't have to cross the street with samples or bags.

    But... Didn't that reduce the number of readily available organ donors?

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  72. Re: Expensive Used to transport valuable items by tg123 · · Score: 1

    Pneumatic tubes are expensive to run and maintain.

    However if you have something valuable like cash, drugs, blood samples then the cost is worth it.

    Pneumatic tubes cant me mugged, misplaced , delayed and there fast.

  73. A first step to using it for patients... by uncqual · · Score: 1

    With just a few more bends, twists, and crossover points, maybe these guys could enhance the system to carry the patients also.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  74. It is a series of tubes after all!!! by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    So the old fuddy duddy guy was right after all! John Stewart, eat your words!

  75. Fun with tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having worked in medical field for years, I have had some fun with the tubes. If you had extra tubes, you would send the tube(s) to "00". They system is designed to send the tube to a station that was in need of more tubes. Well, sometimes patient's cloths where left behind... clothes that security had no interest in keeping track of. Such as used underwear. "00" was the perfect way to dispose of these. Want to 'piss off' pharmacy? They would always get up set if body fluids where sent to their "clean" environment. Load up a tube with a urine specimen that was not placed in a foam container and the urine specimen would explode in the tube system. Needless to say, pharmacy would call the floor that the specimen was sent from and express their displeasure. Sweet to wander over to another floor and send urine spec from that unit. And let the fireworks fly.

    1. Re:Fun with tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as one of those pissed off people in pharmacy, fuck you.

  76. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, seeing as the transfer rate of your average MicroSD card is much less than GigE, you would end up with a pile of cards and a few hundred MB actually on the computer at the other end.

    Regardless, you completely missed the joke.

  77. Stanford Hospital nearly killed me by teac77 · · Score: 1

    Stanford Hospital nearly killed me: I received cyberknife surgery from them. A few months later, I was in severe pain, not understanding what was wrong. Over the phone, they prescribed me decadron, without addressing the great pain I was in. That medicine, coupled with severe pain, almost killed me. I have lost all respect for them.

    1. Re:Stanford Hospital nearly killed me by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I'm really not trying to put you down here, just explaining the other side of it. What did you expect them to do? A few months (!) after a surgery, you suddenly call them complaining of severe pain and demand pain meds over the phone. Now, doesn't that sound like drug-seeking behavior to you?

  78. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by mhajicek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, it's not the network's fault if there's a bottleneck at the customer's site.

  79. Ballantynes, ChCh, NZ by nickrout · · Score: 1

    There was a pneumatic system up and working in Ballantynes, a department store in Christchurch NZ. When you booked something up on your account (or your mother's account LOL) they sent the paperwork to the office in these cool little tubes. It was still working well into the 80's.

  80. Urine Luck by JtCann · · Score: 1

    The pneumatic tube system in the hospital i used to work at in NYC worked great. I wasnt a huge fan because idiots would sometimes send urine samples to the lab with loose caps.... not fun

  81. Re:I guess the only question is... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    It's extremely common for hospitals to use these, especially for controlled substances being sent to different nursing stations. This is in no way new stuff.

  82. Use the same principles for airports? by plopez · · Score: 1

    The article was short on details but why can't we apply the basic principles to other routing of physical goods?

    The math and engineering which allows large tube networks route med samples, documents, teller slips etc. could probably handle baggage at the airport.

    The requirements are the same. I'm not talking about using pneumatic tubes but conveyor belts, automated carts with some human monitoring and intervention. What is the fundamental difference in the problem?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Use the same principles for airports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is used for airports -- DIA uses a pneumatic parts delivery system. The tubes are several feet across.

    2. Re:Use the same principles for airports? by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      Denver had some problems implementing the idea.
      http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~dstearns/SchlohProject/csc463.html

  83. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The bandwidth is great. You can send a 1TB hard drive down the tube.

    It's the latency that sucks.

    Don't try to play a first person shooter, or stream a video through the tube.

  84. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Don't use USB... use Firewire 800, or Esata :)

  85. Series of tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it really is a series of tubes....

  86. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by cheier · · Score: 1

    I've heard of some long read DNA sequences taking up to a full TB of disk space. Pneumatics would be fantastic... :D

  87. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Okay, fine, but we're measuring a round trip between two machines -- a bit doesn't get counted as received, until it's read from the source computer, placed on the transmission medium, received by the destination computer, and copied to the local hard drive of the destination computer.

    A bit's round trip doesn't get completed until a 'response bit' is read off the 'response' drive of the destination computer and written to the 'response' drive of the original source computer.

    It'll be 800gb of data. Transmitted over a distance of 2000 feet.

    Network cabling technology will be Fiber, 2 pairs of single-mode fibers, 10GBase-LR XFPs on two switches at each end, with both links aggregated for load balancing and redundancy, to give a total of 20 Gigabits.

    There will be 5 files to be transferred, each one 133gb in size.

    Both the source and destination computer will each be plugged into switches that plug into each end of the 2 pairs of fiber optic cables, computers plugin to the switches each using a pair of 5 foot Cat6a copper Gig-Ethernet patch cables, interfaces teamed active LACP link aggregation.

    Source and destination computers each have 2 RAID5 arrays of 4 300gb Intel X25-M 6gb/S SSDs, one pre-populated on the sender machine with "data to be sent", one populated on the destination machine with "response data".

    The expected round trip for sending 800gb of data over the network, and getting 800gb of response data is approximately 20 minutes.

  88. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by TehZorroness · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm sure you can send a hard drive through a tube much faster then you can send it over most networks.

  89. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    You can get even more hard drives in the tube with compression.. You just need a hydraulic press. Downside is it's lossy.

  90. Unexpected benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once took a wrong turn and wandered into the pneumatics central room of a major NYC hospital on a really hot summer's day. Lingered in the doorway to take advantage of the refreshing pneumatic breeze. Never got that advantage hanging out near any active computer hardware.

  91. Early Fax machines had issuees... by ctmurray · · Score: 1

    They depended upon you synchronizing two pendulums (one at each end) so often had very poor quality.

    1. Re:Early Fax machines had issuees... by Katchu · · Score: 1

      ... so often had very poor quality.

      and this has changed how? ;^)

      --
      Keep Doing Good.
  92. I wish we had a real worldwide series of tubes... by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

    Just imagine, you'd be able to send anything anwhere at any time, as long as it fit in a pneumatic tube. Sure, it might be slow, but unlike UPS, where I can track my package as it sits in their warehouse for 5 days only 20 miles from my house, I could actually watch my deliveries as they make their way to me in real time.

  93. Re:I guess the only question is... by yamfry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I worked at a hospital with a pretty complicated series of tubes. Even after using it hundreds of times, I still thought it was totally sweet.
    Yes, tubes DO get clogged, and pretty regularly. We fixed it by calling maintenance and saying "tube's down". I think they reversed the polarity or something. If something was extra-stuck it could be down for an hour or so, so they probably have access points or something if reversing didn't work.
    If you use a damaged capsule it can end up clogging the tube, so it's not a good idea. Capsules will get stuck if it's not closed all the way (you try to squeeze stuff too much stuff into it). If you put something in wrapped in a plastic bag (always a good idea with IV bags and things that can break) and a bit of the bag is sticking out it can clog the tubes, too.
    You don't generally put in things that can break easily -- you wouldn't generally send glass bottles, but vials are okay if you throw some padding around them. They don't stop gently, it's a pretty good thud even with whatever braking they use so you make sure the contents will survive impact before you send it. Usually you'll double-bag for biologic and chemo products. If a capsule gets contaminated with bio or chemo there are cleaning procedures. Generally it's just the capsule that gets contaminated. There are probably procedures for shutting down and cleaning the tube system after contamination. It was one of those things that you always think could happen and how much it would suck, but it didn't happen when I worked there.
    If a critical sample gets stuck or destroyed, then tough cookies. There will always be noob mistakes.
    True story: the tube system we used had a function to send tubes out if you had an excess of empty tubes. You push a code and it takes it -somewhere-. Then if you need a tube, you push a code and it sends you an empty one. I don't know how that works, but I always imagined that it involved monkeys.

  94. Re:I guess the only question is... by pnevin · · Score: 1

    no cylinder has ever gotten stuck in a tube

    That sounds like a challenge!

  95. You're gonna need a bigger pipe by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    IT people like to make fun of Stevens for the analogy and yet don't even think about it when they talk about how big the "pipe" is when talking about bandwidth.

    Maybe if he had said it was a "series of pipes" it would have gone over better. Because tubes are different than pipes.

  96. You whippersnappers, nowdays! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Every day, 7,000 times a day, Stanford Hospital staff turn to pneumatic tubes, cutting-edge technology in the 19th century, for a transport network that the Internet and all the latest Silicon Valley wizardry can't match: A tubular system to transport a lab sample across the medical center in the blink of an eye."

    This article might be interesting if you are, say, 15. But they were (and still are) used in banks, the post office, supermarkets and anywhere else people need to transport small packages and money in a complex. Look around next time you are out in the world and you will likely see a few of these tubes.

    How about an article on another archaic, 19th-century piece of technology that works better than any modern Silicon Valley wizardry: the internal combustion engine. I look forward to the one about the bicycle too!

    1. Re:You whippersnappers, nowdays! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      This article might be interesting if you are, say, 15.

      Most of us just skip uninteresting articles.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  97. Hmmmm question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that is some what distressed by the ideal of forcing air and physical containers all around a building that contains infectious diseases?

    Or the thought of a urine sample leaking in the tube ......

  98. The Wheel by eyendall · · Score: 1

    was invented, discovered, constructed centuries ago but we still find it useful, indispensible. What is surprising about the pneumatic tube system remaining useful?

  99. We used to call it p-mail by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    in the olden days.

    Not to be confused with pee-mail, messages that dogs leave for each other on trees and stuff.

  100. New business model. The next online revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The interesting thing here is that one could potentially invent a whole new business model of delivery of goods instead of bits. One could imagine wiring up one of the skyscrapers so that the retail stores have a tube connection to one's apartment. Want dinner? Order it online and have it tubed. Want to try a dress? Tube it. Want to return a dress? Tube it. How about a quart of milk? The possibilities are endless. Shopping will become more convenient and also more JIT. You'd think retailers would kill to have a direct pipe to your apartment. Should work in NY or SF.

  101. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume they do this everywhere, but here in Texas, all of the banks use pneumatic tubing to transfer checks between customers at the drive-through "tellers" and the actual tellers in the bank. Its a pretty cool system.

  102. Teleportation by OutputLogic · · Score: 1

    What about teleportation? Well, I guess it's not electronic either.

  103. Re: Stool Samples by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Memorandum

    From: Pathology Laboratory

    To: Sixth Floor Nurses' Station

    Re: Stool Samples in the Pneumatic Delivery System

    Please remember to pack all stool samples in the specially designed containers. Improvised solutions are not acceptable.

    Thanks in advance.

    The Laboratory Guys

    PS: Next time we are sending it back.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  104. Bandwidth vs latency by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Bandwidth = throughput (packets per second)
    Latency = time (seconds)

    You can somewhat overcome latency by using big packages. Load the tube up with hundreds or thousands of 16Gb USB drives and do everything in batches.

    This actually applies to transport as well. People complain bitterly about the latency of public transport and the advocates merrily reply by saying "but look at the bandwidth"... Which is no use if it takes me 3 hours to get to work. What they really need to do is solve the latency problem.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Bandwidth vs latency by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you can get a lot of 16GB MicroSD cards in one of those things. Still need to get the data off the card onto the PC though.

      This sort of thing can also apply to very fast network connections. If the processor is slow and the software inefficient you lost a lot of bandwidth as buffers fill while waiting for the CPU to actually copy the data, and packets are rejected. Well, in practice it doesn't actually happen because network engineers use a fast enough machine, but it's a factor to consider.

  105. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Wait until you see a cylinder full of 64GB memory cards, then you'll sing a different tune.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  106. Re:oh yeah? got that beat... by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

    I think it's probably more to do with a tech that still today has a cool factor, and manages to still seem futuristic. Seriously - you put a pod in a tube, and it is whisked off to some location on the other side of the building or even a campus. It's the next best thing to Star Trek transporters - and it is indeed made all the more impressive by being a 19th century invention.

    Sure there are oodles of old inventions we still rely on or even marvel at, but I think the pneumatic tube system is indeed a worthy candidate of special attention, particularly as many will not have encountered it and it is perhaps getting more use again.

    Incidentally Tesco here in Ireland use it for cash (surplus from checkouts dispatched into it, and possibly small notes sent the other way).

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  107. Re:I guess the only question is... by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Stuck cylinders can be cleared much in the same way that you can clear a clogged bit of plumbing - access the pipe at the nearest joint/junction to the clog, ram a stiff but flexible probe down there, use the air pressure as best you can, and get on with your life. If all else fails, you can remove the clogged segment and replace it. Depending on what it is, the lost payload may be a real bummer; perhaps irreplaceable. That amounts to a bad day for a couple of people; not a catastrophe. If it is an essential lab test, they'll pull another sample. If it is an essential drug, they'll whistle more up from the pharmacy. If it is not an essential anything then, well, it isn't essential.

    An interesting footnote: many hospitals have "hot labs" for handling radiopharmaceuticals - drugs that have radioactive isotopes in them. These are often used for diagnostic tests rather than treatment. The isotopes involved are usually short-lived, with halflives on the order of an hour or two. As a result, the drugs are manufactured on demand for a particular patient, then shipped up to the diagnostic lab via pneumatic tube. The prepared syringe gets put in the same carrier as ordinary payloads, except these carriers have shielding (usually lead, but sometimes other materials). The shielding is there not because of the concern of irradiating people as the drugs gets whisked by in the tube system - it goes by too quickly to deliver any significant dosage. Rather, the shielding is there in case the carrier gets stuck - delivering radioactivity to one particular place in the hospital. This presents a technical challenge due to the significant additional weight of the carrier - hundreds or thousands of grams - which can make these carriers more prone to getting stuck.

  108. another meaning by jcltoday · · Score: 1

    This gives the word airborne another entire meaning.

  109. Just because it's old doesn't mean it doesn't work by linuxgurugamer · · Score: 1

    I always hear and see people who throw out, get rid of, and replace perfectly good, working equipment, just because it isn't the newest and latest.

    Where I'm working right now, they are aware of this. We are building and using systems built on the older, slower Celeron technology, becuase it's inexpensive, has a proven track record, and simply does the job. Sure, a faster system will do the job faster. But what's the difference between getting the job done in 1 second vs a half second?

  110. This just proves it.. by KaoticEvil · · Score: 1

    .. the whole country is going down the tubes..

    --
    You can close your eyes to reality but not to memories.
  111. I worked at a place that made these things! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked at H-P Products (http://www.hpproducts.net) in High School. Great place. They specialize in tubular products -- which meant that they would manufacture everything from BMW after-market exhausts & roll-bars, to central vacuum systems, Viper seat frames, Corvette Intake manifolds, and... they were the OEM for all these Diebold pneumatic carrier systems you see at bank drive-ups.

    We had pneumatic tubes all over the big factory, from every department, from the first floor to second floor in the offices, and even -under-the-street- for a 300+ yard run to the small factory. Even though this was mostly a straight-shot under the parking lot, picnic tables, street, and into the factory, I could not out-run the tube.

    The R&D room in the small factory was where they tested new pneumatics. Totally cool. I saw the (current, then 'next') generation of switching systems being tested while I worked there. They had an 8x8 multiplexed, full-duplex terminal system that could handle multiple payloads per tube over two tubes. Really fricken' cool.

    You could try to make your own at home, and shoot, I'd encourage it, but have fun trying to figure out how to bend PVC or ABS without deforming / collapsing the tube. Hint: Get your compressor ready, and be prepared to violate patents. :-)

  112. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bandwidth is good - the problem is getting the tube to support full duplex. :)

  113. Re:I guess the only question is... by Seedy2 · · Score: 1

    Since the blood bank was on one side of the street and the hospital was on the other, the tube meant the people didn't have to cross the street with samples or bags.

    But... Didn't that reduce the number of readily available organ donors?

    Nah, most drivers swerve to avoid hitting the stainless steel carts. :)

    Most of the organ donor jokes I hear are about people who ride motorcycles without helmets.
    They call those donorcycles, kind of morbid.

    --
    Nothing to say here... move along
  114. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

    Just put a 1.5 TB SATA drive in the tube and skip the USB transfer all together.

  115. Particularly relevant... by kmac06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    *whoosh*

    1. Re:Particularly relevant... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That went right over my head, I'm afraid.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  116. Half a second. by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

    Just sayin'

  117. Re:Biggest problem with pneumatic tube communicati by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

    So use USB3. :)