Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Announces Achieving Nuclear Fusion

aftertaf writes "North Korea claims to have achieved nuclear fusion by building what it describes as a 'unique thermo-nuclear reaction device.' This announcement was met by skepticism on just about every news website this side of Saturn. Pyongyang claims its latest scientific breakthrough coincides with the birthday of the country's founder and eternal president Kim Il-sung. This is not the first time it seems that the laws of nature have been bent in his honor. According to official biographies, when his son, Kim Jong-il, was born, a new star appeared in the sky." No doubt the Dear Leader combined the atomic nuclei by hand.

372 comments

  1. In related news by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Funny

    The mothers of both Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons received Mother's Day card from their sons postmarked Pyongyang.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:In related news by Kpau · · Score: 1

      I do believe we can officially cross North Korea out as a "communist state" and put it in the Theocracy column. He is a god with Elvis at his right hand.... o.O

    2. Re:In related news by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      To quote the great Mojo Nixon:

      Soon, all will become Elvis; all will be born again in the Elvis light because Elvis is the perfect being.

      Elvis is everywhere
      Elvis is everything
      Elvis is everybody
      Elvis is still The King

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:In related news by wickedskaman · · Score: 1

      So is their economy theocratic as well?

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    4. Re:In related news by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      no. Their economy just sucks.

      Also re: fusion device... ha ha ha ha ha (or I suppose ke ke ke ke ke). yeah, whatever.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:In related news by daem0n1x · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I read an interview of a British researcher that has been studying North Korea for decades and has been there several times. He says that North Korea is actually a fascist country. Their system is based on an almost religious cult for the Dear Leader and racist belief in the superiority of the Korean race. Communism is only in outgoing propaganda. They carefully craft some propaganda in Korean only for their own use, and a different one in English to show to the world.

      I wish I could post a link to the interview, I can't remember it. Very interesting, it made my chin fall a few times.

    6. Re:In related news by Ixpath · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? This happened in 1997 when communist ideology was officially replaced with "Military First politics".

    7. Re:In related news by zaffir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is this it, or related? I just googled the first sentence of your post.

      http://newledger.com/2009/10/fascism-stalinism-and-north-koreas-destiny/

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    8. Re:In related news by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      It's the same guy, but I read an interview with him elsewhere.

    9. Re:In related news by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      That's soooooo nerdy my brain hurts. Well played!

    10. Re:In related news by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      That's soooooo nerdy my brain hurts. Well played!

      Thanks. I was beginning to think that no one got the joke.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  2. Why is Kim Jong IL... by Erythros · · Score: 4, Funny

    Always impersonating that guy from MAD TV??

    1. Re:Why is Kim Jong IL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bobby Lee is always impersonating Kim Jong Il

    2. Re:Why is Kim Jong IL... by wickedskaman · · Score: 1

      Woosh?

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    3. Re:Why is Kim Jong IL... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Uh-oh, hot dog!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Why is Kim Jong IL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... he's got the bomb bomb bombs?

  3. It's Cold Fusion! by billstewart · · Score: 2, Funny

    We know North Korea hasn't released any very hot vaporware lately, so obviously they've perfected Cold Fusion!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was just going to say, why is this on "idle?" This is HUGE news!

    2. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Yeah! The secret is: two cups; one battery!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by BrettJB · · Score: 1

      Kim Jong-il was last heard singing, "This was a triumph. I'm making a note here: HUGE SUCCESS!"

      --
      Smell that? You smell that? Burning karma, son. Nothing in the world smells like that...
    4. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by Kpau · · Score: 1

      Wasn't a very hot cup of tea involved? Or wait, that's was Improbability Drive...

    5. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I personally can't wait for the first awkward weeks of democracy when they start releasing North Korean porn.

    6. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was trying to make shower curtains?

    7. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      CIA outnumbers legit slashdotters 2 - 1.

    8. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's no news, Chuck Norris was made first

    9. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just going to say, why is this on "idle?" This is HUGE news!

      Here, in Argentina, we have had nuclear fusion years ago, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huemul_Project .

      I think it is quite clever to put this new on idle.

    10. Re:It's Cold Fusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! The secret is: two girls; one cup!

      FTFY

  4. Not a star ... by PhxBlue · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was actually an American spy satellite parked in geosynchronous orbit over North Korea. Wave for the cameras, Kim!

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    1. Re:Not a star ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ROR!!!

    2. Re:Not a star ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rotate Right? Buy why?

    3. Re:Not a star ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raugh out Roud! Why I so ronrey?

    4. Re:Not a star ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You-a rike Rucky Strike?

    5. Re:Not a star ... by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Repeated Oral Raucous

    6. Re:Not a star ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kekekekeke

  5. In other top stories... by dkh2 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.

    I'm absolutely certain the highly advanced scientists in the PRK have succeeded in achieving fusion. Unfortunately for them the fusion they actually achieved was by patching together recordings of Dave Brubek and Dave Matthews.

    --
    My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    1. Re:In other top stories... by Altus · · Score: 1, Funny

      That sounds like a real crime against humanity.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    2. Re:In other top stories... by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

      Worse than the fusion of Shatner & Elton John ?

    3. Re:In other top stories... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uhm, a crime against all sentient life in the Universe?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  6. Fusion isn't hard. by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Informative

    You could build the equipment yourself.

    Getting more energy out of fusion than you put in... that's the hard part.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This was my thought--so what if they did? We did it more than 50 years ago, the Teller-Ulam designed warhead dates to 1951. Fusing two atoms is trivial.

    2. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      it just takes a fission to get the fuse lit...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    3. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Funny

      This was my thought--so what if they did? We did it more than 50 years ago, the Teller-Ulam designed warhead dates to 1951. Fusing two atoms is trivial.

      Hey, let's not burden the journalists with dry facts.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      The Teller-Ulam design uses that, but a basic particle accelerator would work too.

    5. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is likely what they have made. Of course it is a unique device. Any device that isn't in series production tends to be unique...

    6. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could build the equipment yourself.

      Getting more energy out of fusion than you put in... that's the hard part.

      The Farnsworth–Hirsch Fusor, or simply fusor, is an apparatus designed by Philo T. Farnsworth to create nuclear fusion.

      Good news, everyone!

      p.s., captcha:dictator. I-RON-Y!

    7. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by RsG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it just takes a fission to get the fuse lit...

      Not even. Read the GP's wiki link for a description of a "Farnsworth fusor" (not the Farnsworth you're thinking of, but rather his namesake). Making fusion reactions occur is trivially easy, to the point where there exists at least one hobbyist who's made a fusor in his basement. Betcha that's what NK has built, and the claim of it being a "unique thermo-nuclear reaction device" was likely tacked on by some lackey in the propaganda department. Again, old news in the fusion world, as fusors aren't useful for much other than proof of concept.

      Getting a net gain in energy with a fusion reaction? Hard. The only way we've done it to date is in a thermonuclear warhead, and I guarantee Pyongyang doesn't have one of those yet, since they've had enough trouble getting basic fission bombs built.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    8. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      On contrary, I think that is is "wink wink, nudge nudge, btw we have H-bombs now, beware cowards!" anouncement.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    9. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by astar · · Score: 1

      As you say. I RTFA and it hardly made any claim, except perhaps optimism. Even in US advertising, puffery is not actionable.

      But I recalling hearing there were perhaps a 100 sort of credible low-cost approaches. Pick one, spend a million dollars, and you could have scientific feasibility. I suspect their cost structure is different than ours, so they could have tried a number of approaches. Given that they did nukes, I am not sure really poor need be a big thing to get to feasibility. But whoever in the world makes a claim of net energy production on this will need to do more than a press announcement to be credible.

    10. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fusors actually do have practical uses. Fusors have been used commercially as a compact neutron source that can be turned on or off easily. Note that the other commercial neutron sources of a similar sort actually also use fusion. They work by using a linear accelerator to collide deuterium and tritium.

    11. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your stupid Earth mind cannot conceive power of Kim Il Sung Juche Physics.

      Unless you send FIVE (5) million tonnes of rice, TEN POINT TWO (10.2) million tonnes of kimchi, FIFTY FOUR POINT SIX (54.6) million tonnes of ramen now you will be destroyed by my Solanite bombs.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I wounder if they actually funded a Polywell reactor? If so someone needs to slap around the DOE and DOD.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually at the next press announcement they are going to show the actual device, but they have to wait for it to rise first.

    14. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by RsG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, they wouldn't be that subtle. Recall that they made a big fuss over "we have the bomb now", only to have their first actual test detonation fizzle.

      Besides, if they were testing H-bombs, there would be third party confirmation. They cannot set off a nuke, never mind a big nuke, without setting off seismic detectors from India to California.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    15. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's also possible they've assembled one of Bussard's whiffleball fusors. Not tremendously complicated, and if you threw a couple hundred million at it (assuming the theory behind it were correct) you might get a practical reactor.

    16. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by damburger · · Score: 1

      A working one? Certainly not. Considering they fucked up an implosion type a-bomb (which the west put into mass production in the 1940s), they probably wouldn't be able to handle something so technical.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    17. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Zediker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, the Polywell reactor is a very interesting concept: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell (even has pictures)

      pictures of it in action: http://www.emc2fusion.org/

      It will be interesting what there results are next year when its completed in April 2011.

      --
      I love to slaughter the english language.
    18. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called coincidence.

    19. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Flambergius · · Score: 1

      How do you know which Farnsworth I'm thinking about? Are you reading my mind? Is that a technology North Korea developed too?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
    20. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by monoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, that's also possible. In theory, it could even be done without a fission primary.

      Now, doing it in a controlled and sustained way, that's a bit more difficult.

    21. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      Actually at the next press announcement they are going to show the actual device, but they have to wait for it to rise first.

      I knew it! Loaf-of-bread fusion! Hopefully they can improve on my method of applying two melted Kraft singles.

    22. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes. And also, it's isn't natural for you to harbour such thoughts about your mother. Seriously, you need therapy.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    23. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      And china has thermonuclear weapons, and a fusion research programme, so it's not like the DPRK couldn't have 'borrowed' a lot of the technology from the PRC. Put a new metal case on it, new coat of paint, call it a new device.

      And let us not forget, the DPRK has built nuclear weapons and a nuclear reactor, going the next step to fusion technology shouldn't really shock anyone. Whether or not it's any good is another matter entirely.

    24. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Cue Dear Leader mooning the camera...

    25. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      More *useful* energy, if you get fusion you are likely to get more energy, it's just not very useful. It's turning the energy you get into something you can plug the toaster into that's hard.

    26. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      JET just about managed to get more useful energy out than they put in. Even self sustaining (for some rediculuously short time). Although they shut it down just after, to focus on ITER, whenever that gets finished.

    27. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by cgenman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was going to say, why is everyone laughing this off? It's very unlikely to be true. But we seem to be laughing at it because "our scientists are obviously better than their scientists."

      Yes, it's probably BS. But it isn't BS until it is disproven. And yes, there isn't anything there to disprove right now. And sure, we haven't been able to achieve net positive fusion yet. Net negative fusion is pretty easy. I wouldn't expect useful fusion to be achieved by the old methods. I would expect it to come from unexpected approaches. And honestly, I would expect unexpected approaches from China, Brazil, North Korea, Russia, or somewhere that has less to lose by the untraditional, and who has the need to improvise around a lack of equipment. That doesn't mean it's likely to succeed.

      I don't know. Just because it's probably BS doesn't mean it deserves derision and dismissal. Is there a term for "nation-ism"? "part-of-the-world-ism"?

    28. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      The Farnsworth I was thinking of was that TV guy. You know the one I mean.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    29. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Extraordinary claims require at least some evidence.....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    30. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After which, all their base will belong to us!

    31. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by TheKidWho · · Score: 0

      Really? Useful energy is energy you can get work out of...

      And yes, there is a lot of energy coming out of the reaction that can not be used for doing work...

    32. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      “Useless energy” is best illustrated by what you just expended by typing that rant.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    33. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by RsG · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. I don't need telepathy to know that the moment you read "Farnsworth", a little voice in your head piped up "good news everyone!" :-P

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    34. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      A Pollywell reactor may be cheaper and easier than an a-bomb. Plus they could just have gotten lucky.
      I will admit that the odds are really slime to none but it is possible.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    35. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's probably BS. But it isn't BS until it is disproven. And yes, there isn't anything there to disprove right now.

      Uh, there are cases, where it's BS until proven beyond reasonable doubt. If NK announced the Sun is going to rise tomorrow, then I'd be very worried, 'cos it's likely to be BS.

      Whenever there is no accountability, BS starts to come out. Though it has to be said, at least their BS is often funny.

    36. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Farnsworth-Hirsch Fusor, or simply fusor, is an apparatus designed by Philo T. Farnsworth to create nuclear fusion.

      p.s., captcha:dictator. I-RON-Y!

      Good news, everyone!

      It's called coincidence.

      No, I'm pretty sure they named him after the scientist guy. :)

    37. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by WNight · · Score: 4, Funny

      HELLO

      We name is PRINCE WUNDAI, my family is ONE OF the largest farmer in Nigeria. Father was captured by Warlord who is trying to steal our family fortune. To secure our family, decided we are to looking for a country we can trust to help us smuggle the grain to a safe location.

      We picked your country, NORTH KOREA, because of your honest reputation. We'd like to offer you 50% (HALF) of the grain for your help in securing the rest against warlords and USA aggression.

      The grain is packed on ships, waiting on the name of a port to deliver it to.

      We need only small bribes for the Somalian pirates to let our ships pass, and we will be on our way.

      Please help us, KIM JONG IL

    38. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, nuclear bombs don't produce useful energy. We've had nuclear bombs for decades, but other than a deterrent against enemies, they're really not very useful devices.

      What we need is something that creates useful energy, energy that can be harnessed and used for useful purposes, namely generating electricity. That means you need a controlled reaction, something we haven't achieved yet (to my knowledge) in a way that produces more energy than is required to sustain the reaction.

    39. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good news everybody!

    40. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by tgd · · Score: 1

      The energy they produce is useful as long as you're not the one standing next to it ...

    41. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's why the lights are turned off every night in North Korea. 50 years of charging up the batteries to start the reaction.

    42. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by speederaser · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, nuclear bombs don't produce useful energy. We've had nuclear bombs for decades, but other than a deterrent against enemies, they're really not very useful devices.

      The Russians might disagree with that:

      http://www.livescience.com/technology/russia-nuke-gulf-oil-well-100512.html

    43. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's probably BS. But it isn't BS until it is disproven. And yes, there isn't anything there to disprove right now.

      Sounds like religion.

    44. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Dude, it is North-fucking-Korea. Their news is a non-stop stream of verifiablely false bullshit. While they were shedding of double digit percentage points of their population to starvation in the 90's their news declared that all was well and all North Koreans were fat and happy. They were playing this shit on TV (for the very few who had TV) to people who had to work over corpses and were busy literally eating dirt. These people could clearly see from the corpses on the ground, dead relatives, and the fact that they were shaving pine bark into their "food" that the news was clearly lying, yet the news went on declaring all is well as people literally starved to death.

      Me declaring that I have achieved fusion in my basement would be a more credible claim that North Korea doing it because at least I am not a proven compulsive liar. No, you should safely and easily dismiss North Korea's claims until they show evidence that they have done as they have done. Until they show evidence, you can safely discard this "news" from their propaganda machine as complete and total bullshit.

    45. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      I produced a faster than light engine in my apartment using nothing but tin cans, duct tape, and my own stored flatulence.

      Do you believe me? If no, you refute yourself. If yes, I'll sell you my research for $1,000,000 (no refunds if it later turns out to have been fabricated).

    46. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very handy for assassinations. Put the fusor in a tv camera and bombard the target with neutrons every time he makes a speech until the cumulative effect takes him out. I wonder if
      Kim has considered that. Perhaps he should purge his nuclear researchers just in case.

    47. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine powers my flux capacitor!

    48. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by IMightB · · Score: 1

      How's this much different form our media? It's streaming a non-stop stream of *news* that's so spun and biased that it may as well be made up.

    49. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Good news everyone, My sig is on topic.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    50. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Mod parent +9. Previous 8 moderation attempts failed.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    51. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Shihar · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure if double digit percentages of the US population was dead of starvation and everyone else was on the verge of starvation, even Fox News would report it.

      Please take off the moral relativism glasses. It is okay to look at the certainly shitty US media and declare it better than the vastly shittier North Korean news media. You can air a report on what an asshole Obama or Bush is without government agents kicking in your door, killing you, and sending your entire freaking extended family to a slave labor camp.

      Please get some mother-fucking-perspective.

    52. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. Kimmy would certainly have made sure that everyone knows he has the H-Bomb if he had it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    53. Re:Fusion isn't hard. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You know, I have to giggle every time I read about Juche. In German, there's a word, "Jauche". And that means liquid manure.

      It's strange how German words, used in another language, speak the truth.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Duke Nukem Forever Released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In North Korea, anything is possible.

    1. Re:Duke Nukem Forever Released by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      In regards to the title:

      Now that is vaporware! lol

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Duke Nukem Forever Released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was zombo com?

    3. Re:Duke Nukem Forever Released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In North Korea, anything is possible.

      No, that's zombo.com.

    4. Re:Duke Nukem Forever Released by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You have been lied to. Visit obmoz.com for re-education.

    5. Re:Duke Nukem Forever Released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are the best at math so why not?

    6. Re:Duke Nukem Forever Released by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      In North Korea, Duke Nukem releases you!

  8. Now a credible threat to the west. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let's just say they did achieve Nuclear Fusion. Clean cheap bountiful energy means overpopulation. This is an enormous threat to the world, even more dangerous than them having nuclear weapons. They could use the threat of releasing this technology to extort endless aid from the west.

    1. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by sznupi · · Score: 2

      I don't seem to remember many examples when the lack of "clean cheap bountiful energy" stopped people from breeding...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by AndersOSU · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'd have to figure out how to grow food first.

    3. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by damburger · · Score: 1

      Both of you, just fucking stop. Overpopulation is not the worlds most pressing problem. Its just a pretext for racists to claim that 'breeds' too much. Never 'has children' of course because these people are sub-human to you guys. Ignorant, racist fucks.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    4. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you aren't joking, shut up you fucking hippie.

    5. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Clean cheap bountiful energy means overpopulation.

      I guess that's why the developed world, which has cheap bountiful energy, has a much higher birth rate and population growth than the 3rd world. Or not - indigineous populations in the developed world have been declining for decades, with immigration and large immigrant families causing the population growth. I'm _not_ being racist here, nor claiming we should do anything about this fact, I'm just stating that the places where energy is cheapest (comparative to wealth) are the places with lowest population growth or population decline.

    6. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Sooo...saying that people "breed" (as opposed to who? Neanderthals?) is racist suddenly? You have a weird idea of what "people" means...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by boneclinkz · · Score: 0

      Both of you, just fucking stop. Overpopulation is not the worlds most pressing problem. Its just a pretext for racists to claim that 'breeds' too much. Never 'has children' of course because these people are sub-human to you guys. Ignorant, racist fucks.

      Amen. Probably racist, at the very least classist. It makes a great springboard from which to say something like "don't have children if you live in a third world country, DUH!" The problem, of course, is that reproduction is essentially the meaning of life. Not that everyone opts to do it, or is able to, but it's still pretty hard to suppress that kind of biological imperative.

    8. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Humans are supressing "biological imperatives", with culture, for a long, long time...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think he missed a few words in there, but what he meant was:

      Overpopulation is a pretext for racists to advocate “population control” whereby they hope to address the poverty that breeds itself, particular in certain segments of the population who cannot seem to keep their legs closed. This is all supported with arguments such as follows:

      It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them. Herein lies the key of civilization. For upon the foundation of an enlightened and voluntary motherhood shall a future civilization emerge.

      Aww, hell. I’m forgetting where I am. I should’ve just said she was strongly against masturbation...

      In my experience as a trained nurse while attending persons afflicted with various and often revolting diseases, no matter what their ailments, I have never found any one so repulsive as the chronic masturbator. It would be difficult not to fill page upon page of heartrending confessions made by young girls, whose lives were blighted by this pernicious habit, always begun so innocently, for even after they have ceased the habit, they find themselves incapable of any relief in the natural act. [...] Perhaps the greatest physical danger to the chronic masturbator is the inability to perform the sexual act naturally.

      Now most of Slashdot will be up in arms, I’m sure.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I think he simply missed that for some people(sic), the term "people" when used such generally means simply "members of homo sapiens sapiens"...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      But aren't people who run around labeling everyone racists just trying to make themselves feel better about themselves?

      But hey - if it makes you feel really good about yourself and you can think about what a wonderful person you are at night when you're trying to sleep, go for it. Just don't be surprised at what the world looks like with 15 billion people.

    12. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      It's much more enlightened to be a wonderful caring human and let them spit out kid after kid into a short, brutal life of horror. Third world overpopulation is, literally, the creation of life for the purpose of suffering.

      Your "classist" has a more moral position than you do. Maybe you should think about that a bit.

    13. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Well, I was paraphrasing. I think what he more literally intended to say was:

      Its just a pretext for racists to claim that some people (primarily certain races) 'breed' too much.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    14. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the world's most pressing problem?

      Hint: if you say availability of water, food or energy, you lose.

    15. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by damburger · · Score: 1

      A future population of 15 billion? Evidence or STFU.

      I'm not trying to make myself 'feel better' - I just don't like slashdot posters living off their parents money making veiled eugenic statements.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    16. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      "Let them"? Dude, you "let" your kids do this or do that, you don't "let" other people reproduce, it's not your position to "let" anyone anything.

    17. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      GP is full of shit. The most possimistic estimates point to a maximum of 11 billions. Check this

    18. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by HBoar · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take much searching at all to find that UN projections predict that the world population could reach around 15 billion by 2100. That's the upper projection based on the assumption that demographic changes etc. don't cause a huge decrease in birth rates.

      By accusing people of advocating eugenics and racism at the slightest mention of decreasing birth rates, it just sounds like you're scared of poorer countries breaking the cycle of poverty and being able to compete with your precious country.

    19. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by Eclipse-now · · Score: 1
      Whoever you're correcting sure must be a moron! To even go down the 'eugenics' pathway in objecting to discussing overpopulation seems to reveal some kind of extreme political bias and ignorance.

      To solve over-population, we should:-
      1. provide adequate security and nutrition for developing countries.
      2. provide fresh water infrastructure
      3. educate and empower women
      4. provide access to employment and stable economic systems
      5. basically, modernise developing countries with access to modern health and family planning services that we enjoy
      6. provide some basic level of economic security in retirement and old age

      These are the keys to populations stabilising. What's so sinister about that? For more, see... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition

    20. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      ...and if he gets such meaning out of what was said, that's his problem (for the record, people having more plentiful energy and generally decent standard of living is actually the only proven, civilised way of population control)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    21. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it "doesn't take much searching" to find these projections, and you somehow haven't found them, that makes you full of shit.

      Maybe accusations of racism/eugenics are a bit harsh, but if you simply make shit up to justify the assertion that some group of people 'breed' too much, and someone reading an Internet forum has no knowledge of you or context to place your remakrs in, what do you expect?

    22. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really it's perfectly true. Racism is the least of the problem, there was a recent slashdot arguement linking schizophrenia and creativity. So yea, we still don't know enough to even begin to start with Eugenics.
      Of course you do realize that environmentalism is the other side of population control. We'll become a bland society living on paste and not "wasting" resources on anything that goes against the norm.
      Take your pick really.
      Actually don't take your pick, huge impending threats seem to be the biggest tool of warmongers these days (*cough* Bush) so keep an ear to the ground for all our sakes but don't forget Charlie Manson.

    23. Re:Now a credible threat to the west. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Now most of Slashdot will be up in arms, I’m sure.

      I don't think their arms will be up.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  9. In other news... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, power in Pyongyang will only be available from 5:00 - 7:00 PM this week in celebration of the achievement.

    1. Re:In other news... by Spaham · · Score: 5, Funny

      you mean : in celebration of the achievement, power WILL be available from 5:00 - 7:00 PM this week !!

    2. Re:In other news... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Which is why George W picked Iraq as the Axis of Evil to attack...

      I mean you can't have snappy lines like "We will bomb them into the dark ages" when they already are...literally!

      Also bombers could never finds targets, too dark!

      Whatever I am kidding.

    3. Re:In other news... by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Copious and plentiful electric power is always available. Only enemies of our glorious leader would say otherwise. Please step outside and shout "I'm a capitalist sympathizer" until dawn so that our efficient protectors of society can find and bring you to justice.

    4. Re:In other news... by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Minitrue instructed - malquoted. Rectify fullwise.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  10. I'm not worried by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 0

    During the 2008 campaign, Dear Leader Kim Jung-il endorsed Obama.

    http://freekorea.us/2008/06/22/obama-gets-another-unwanted-endorsement/

    http://www.korea-np.co.jp/news/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleID=31952

    I feel sure this is all just a misunderstanding and after Obama telephones Dear Leader (at 3AM), everything will be just peachy once again.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  11. He is small enough to do it. by ad454 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No doubt the Dear Leader combined the atomic nuclei by hand.

    No doubt that he is small enough to have done it.

    1. Re:He is small enough to do it. by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Of course, his cute little puppet hands would do the trick. Being created by those wacky South Park Puppeteers Matt Stein and Trey Parkhurst has its advantages. Team America, although huge dicks, should be alerted post haste!

      In other news; I have just perfected Quantum Computing and the language of the Quantum Computer; QBasic, but am waiting to announce it on my birthday. We are still trying to license Q-Bert for our mascot. Stay tuned and subscribe to my newsletterings!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:He is small enough to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he's too - er - busy to actually do rough manual labor. He just had them locked in a very small, spartan room, explained theirpatriotic duty to them (I suppose theu werer selected for patriotism and conformity, to begin with) and piped in every single patriotic government speech they had available. They caved in in les thana month, I heard.
      But, hold on, I thought that, well, "fusing" was sort of frowned upon, over there? Or have social mores eased up a tiny wee bit?
      Visiting tourist atoms, in special accomodations? Hm.

  12. Nuclear Fusion the new softdrink by Rivalz · · Score: 1

    4x the caffeine and fused with crazy to create the Nuclear Fusion Cocktail blend.
    Side effects are mild hallucinations, delusions of grandeur, and inflated ego.

    1. Re:Nuclear Fusion the new softdrink by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just out of curiosity, what part of "No peasants are starving, our economy is great, everyone else in the world envies/fears us, and by the way we just perfected nuclear fusion!" is a *mild* hallucination?

    2. Re:Nuclear Fusion the new softdrink by sqldr · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's fusion alright.

      They've managed to fuse horseshit with bullshit, and now they're feeding it to the starving masses!

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    3. Re:Nuclear Fusion the new softdrink by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, what part of "No peasants are starving, our economy is great, everyone else in the world envies/fears us, and by the way we just perfected nuclear fusion!" is a *mild* hallucination?

      It's only a hallucination/delusion if he believes it. Otherwise, it's just Pseudologia fantastica.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  13. Well, good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they can have the lights on to see if they got a bonus bit of cockroach protein in with their two blades of grass soup. Haute cuisine, Nork style.

  14. Doesn't the star count by SloWave · · Score: 5, Funny

    I figured he would have took credit for creating fusion when that new star appeared when his son was born.

  15. I, for one, welcome our new North Korean Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then again, I think I would prefer Vogons...

  16. Already done by aBaldrich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In 1949 one of the several nazi leaders that fled to Argentina claimed to have achieved nuclear fussion. The president, a fascist who welcomed Mengele and Eichman, was not stupid, and a couple of months later he called a group of argentinian scientists back from europe to open an investigation, which led to the end of the project and the beginning of real atomic research.

    --
    In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    1. Re:Already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It turned out the process was to fussy to be useful.

  17. Where does he find the time? by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought the dear leader was busy flying fighter jets, memorizing phone books, breaking golf records, and leading the NBA in rebounding.

    If he can do nuclear fusion as well, then perhaps his talents truly are limitless.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Where does he find the time? by eviloverlordx · · Score: 1

      Clones.

      --
      'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
    2. Re:Where does he find the time? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      I thought the dear leader was busy flying fighter jets, memorizing phone books, breaking golf records, and leading the NBA in rebounding.

      No, you've got that wrong. Kim Il-sung is only in second place for NBA rebounds.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:Where does he find the time? by neBelcnU · · Score: 1

      Wait a second, does this mean Dear Leader is...anti-Chuck Norris?

    4. Re:Where does he find the time? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Gosh, I don't know whose attributes I would rather have. GWB, who can overcome any challenge with brazen stupidity; Rain Man, who can count cards and frighten small town waitresses; Tiger Woods, who can sleep with many women like he is a random celebrity; Sport Guy, who does sport guy things.

      My vote is Rain Man. I like institutional food.

  18. Don't Discriminate! by notommy · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> This announcement was met by skepticism on just about every news website this side of Saturn.
    Sure! Make it sound like we on the other side of Saturn will believe anything. That's planetism sir!

    1. Re:Don't Discriminate! by localman57 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But at some point, shouldn't all the planets be on this side of Saturn? That is, if Saturn is on one side of the sun, and all the other planets happen to be on the other? This should eventually happen if none of their orbits is a multiple of another.

    2. Re:Don't Discriminate! by Colourspace · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, next they'll be telling us Jupiters lost one of its rings. Pfffft.

    3. Re:Don't Discriminate! by sockonafish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically it's hemispherism.

    4. Re:Don't Discriminate! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      This side of Saturn's orbit.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Don't Discriminate! by mortonda · · Score: 1, Interesting

      technically, Saturn is *never* on this side of Saturn.

    6. Re:Don't Discriminate! by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Sure! Make it sound like we on the other side of Saturn will believe anything.

      It has nothing to do with what they believe; it just took that long for the news to reach them.

    7. Re:Don't Discriminate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we gotta take shit from Uranus?

    8. Re:Don't Discriminate! by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Half of it must be. And if you don't look, the probability wave of which half it is won't collapse, so the two halves are equally on the other side.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:Don't Discriminate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I just thought they meant that North Korea was talking out of Uranus.

    10. Re:Don't Discriminate! by BryanL · · Score: 1

      Well then, pull your head out of Uranus.

      There, it had to be said.

    11. Re:Don't Discriminate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Schrodinger, is that you?

    12. Re:Don't Discriminate! by Convector · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed right now all the planets (in our Solar System) are on this side of Saturn. Of course, only two of these can ever be on the far side of it from us. That's right, I'm not counting Pluto as a planet.

    13. Re:Don't Discriminate! by jd · · Score: 1

      That can may or may not have worms, you cannot know until you open it.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  19. Thermo Nuclear Device by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
    Now, since we're dealing with N. Korea, what it really means is that they put some heavy water into a Thermos - get it, "thermo nuclear device"?

    Hey, N. Korea! I need a job! I can come up with shit like that all day! I'll even get on my knees to kiss the Supreme Ruler's ass!

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:Thermo Nuclear Device by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Hey, N. Korea! I need a job! I can come up with shit like that all day! I'll even get on my knees to kiss the Supreme Ruler's ass!

      You're hired. The wages is 200 grams of rice a day. "No" is not an acceptable answer to this offer.

    2. Re:Thermo Nuclear Device by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      200 grams of rice should be enough for anybody!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Thermo Nuclear Device by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Sure! Look how healthy this fine 4ft 80lb emaciated young man is. He's the picture of health!

    4. Re:Thermo Nuclear Device by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    5. Re:Thermo Nuclear Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 24.4 BMI is emaciated? He must be an American.

  20. Good job North Korea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Congratulations! You managed to announce achieving nuclear fusion!

    The next step is to achieve nuclear fusion.

    I'm sure you'll get there some day.

    1. Re:Good job North Korea! by bughunter · · Score: 1

      To them, fusion is much like the female orgasm: Rumored to exist, frequently boasted of in the West, but nearly impossible to achieve on command.

      It's far easier to just announce it (loudly and repetitively, preferably with frequent appeals to one's deity).

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:Good job North Korea! by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough female orgasms are also announced "loudly and repetitively, preferably with frequent appeals to one's deity"

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    3. Re:Good job North Korea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I have to say it...

      WHOOOOOOOOSH.

      That was all part of his analogy. Deliberately.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:Good job North Korea! by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      Goddamn it! That's the first time it's ever happened to me!

      (I swear if you say "that's not what I've heard" or "that's not what she said" I will find you)

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
  21. What if.. by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For some reason I can't help but think that it would be hilarious and kind of scary if everyone chuckles a bit at this and in a couple of months news reports come in saying that for some strange reason the long-running North Korean energy crisis seems to have been solved...

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    1. Re:What if.. by mi · · Score: 1

      for some strange reason the long-running North Korean energy crisis seems to have been solved...

      ... by all the American stomachs roasted by the mujahedeen in Hell....

      Oh, wait, that's from another regime's ministry of information.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:What if.. by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder what would happen then. I'm guessing a small nuke would go off in their research area, which the west would blame on their own experiments. At the same time, all nations of moderate or higher economic means would dump research into the subject under the idea that "if North Korea could do it, so can we".

    3. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, by a device that runs on Asian hubris*.

      * By that, I mean the mentality that says "I'm (or my kids are) better because I go to {big name university} and made {shit-tons of cash}!"

    4. Re:What if.. by psyque · · Score: 1

      more likely, they'll dump money into an occupation force. Works for the US.

    5. Re:What if.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      No, it would be a great thing. Even if they are our 'enemy,' it is clear by this point that they don't actually want to fight us, and the technology would eventually make it to the rest of the world, much faster than it is the way we are doing it.

      Of course, they didn't invent it, but if.......

      --
      Qxe4
    6. Re:What if.. by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      For some reason I can't help but think that it would be hilarious and kind of scary if everyone chuckles a bit at this and in a couple of months news reports come in saying that for some strange reason the long-running North Korean energy crisis seems to have been solved...

      Well, North Koren could release another news report saying just that very thing and if nothing else satellite imagery could verify at least that much of the story by looking at North Korea at night.

      But anyway, if they were able to do it, which I doubt, that would mean that it definitely can be done, it's just a matter of figuring out how to do it. Right now nobody knows if it's really even possible to do it or not. The main surprise to me is that they didn't give the Dear Leader credit for the breakthrough that allowed this to supposedly happen. If you've ever seen a documentary film about North Korea, you'll understand how the (late) Great Leader and the Dear Leader get credit for everything. I recently saw a short clip on the internet about a Canadian film crew that got to go to Pyongyang's movie studio. They spent most of their time at a rarely open museum where one of the tour guides personally gave Kim Jong-Il credit for inventing the idea of using multiple cameras at different locations on a set to shoot the same action from different angles. In one documentary I saw some kids singing a song that had some line about Kim Jong-Il or his father causing the sun to rise and I honestly don't know if it was just a case of simple exaggeration in a song's lyrics or if the people of North Korea actually believe he causes the sun to rise. In another documentary on the 1966 North Korean World Cup team (it reached the final 8 of the tournament before being eliminated - it's actually one of the all time great World Cup underdog stories), I saw some of the members weeping almost uncontrollably when they thought back on the death of Kim Il-Sung. I just can't imagine anyone in the west weeping 10+ years later for some dead American president and acting like it was some tremendous personal loss that he was gone. One day North Korea will fall apart and it will reunite with South Korea and then we're going to have a lot of seriously pissed off North Koreans who simply cannot believe that they fell for all that crap about the Kims for so long.

    7. Re:What if.. by malevo · · Score: 1

      This is not the first time that fusion reaction has been announced before.

    8. Re:What if.. by krnpimpsta · · Score: 1

      One day North Korea will fall apart and it will reunite with South Korea and then we're going to have a lot of seriously pissed off North Koreans who simply cannot believe that they fell for all that crap about the Kims for so long.

      I think it's more likely we'll have a bunch of confused North Koreans who don't understand why the rest of the world does not believe all the great things their "dear leader" has done - and probably alot of cults that try to spread their Kim-jong-il beliefs to "save" everyone.

      --

      New webcomic updated on Sundays: HERE

    9. Re:What if.. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's not at all clear N Korea doesn't want to fight "us" (whoever "we" are). Wanting to fight is a good explanation for maintaining a military in permanent deployment, especially to the border, for developing nukes and long range missiles (and shooting them over Japan towards California), and a steady stream of rhetorical attacks in every medium. It's not the only explanation, but there is certainly no clarity that N Korea doesn't want to fight, given all the prima facie evidence that it does.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:What if.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Had they wanted to, they would have a long time ago, they've had many chances.

      The rhetoric goes both ways: remember Bush labeling them an axis of evil. That doesn't mean we wanted to fight them.

      --
      Qxe4
    11. Re:What if.. by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Had they wanted to, they would have a long time ago,

      In point of fact, they did a long time ago.

    12. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is likely that some of the next "really big things" won't be invented/discovered by the US. Odds favour countries like China and India for producing results from scientific research. Partly it's a numbers gaime - they have large populations and their education systems are (or will be soon) par or better than the US.

    13. Re:What if.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh? And you think they will want to again?

      --
      Qxe4
    14. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that prevented Dubya from invading North Korea, aside from their rather sizable military, is China. The Chinese government hates the PRK, but they sure as shit don't want the USA in their place.

    15. Re:What if.. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The thind that has stopped both China and the USA from invading the place is they then need to do something with a basket case of a country full of people that have been brainwashed to the point of uselessness.
      It's more some sort of very weird cult theocracy than anything else.

    16. Re:What if.. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Cult theocracy doesn't begin to explain that place. The entire country defies all logic. Jim Jones or David Koresh made more sense than the North Korean leadership. There was a documentary series that I saw a couple of years ago where some journalists got into the country posing as tourists, and the things they brought back were so downright bizarre and lacking in sense that I gave up all hope of them coming around through any means other than force in this century, and even then, mass suicides will follow as they realize that Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il (and whomever follows him) were not unbeatable. I've seen reports (separate from that documentary) that during air raid drills, people outside when it starts will rush into their homes to get every picture of Kim Il Sung they have and carry them into the bomb shelter with them. They will then tend to their children. Whether they do this through fear or devotion, that's just hard to wrap my mind around.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    17. Re:What if.. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Oh? And you think they will want to again?

      If "us" includes South Korea, there's plenty of evidence that they've done so quite a few times since the big one a long time back, including quite recently.

    18. Re:What if.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's hard to claim that was intended to start off any real fighting.

      --
      Qxe4
    19. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to claim that was intended to start off any real fighting.

      Torpedoing a warship is real fighting. Sure, they probably didn't prefer to provoke any retaliation, but, really, the attacked enemy not fighting back is almost always the best possible result from the point of view of the attacker.

      Retaliation is usually a risk that is accepted in an attack, not a desired result (there are occasional exceptions, particular when the attacker is a terrorist group, but those are the exception, not the rule.)

    20. Re:What if.. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Reposted because inadvertently posted as AC.

      It's hard to claim that was intended to start off any real fighting.

      Torpedoing a warship is real fighting. Sure, they probably didn't prefer to provoke any retaliation, but, really, the attacked enemy not fighting back is almost always the best possible result from the point of view of the attacker.

      Retaliation is usually a risk that is accepted in an attack, not a desired result (there are occasional exceptions, particular when the attacker is a terrorist group, but those are the exception, not the rule.)

    21. Re:What if.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      So you think North Korea was trying to start a war by sending that torpedo? Or do you think decades of inaction in response to similar actions led them to believe they could do it without military consequences?

      --
      Qxe4
    22. Re:What if.. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      So you think North Korea was trying to start a war by sending that torpedo?

      In order to start a war, they'd have to not be at war already.

      A temporary cease-fire punctuated by periodic incidents of armed engagement isn't peace, even if it lasts for half a century.

      OTOH, I think if North Korea didn't want to be in a permanent state of war (with intermittent, low-level combat and accepting the risk that that would escalate into higher-level combat), then they wouldn't still be at war.

    23. Re:What if.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Dude, what are you talking about? If N. Korea wanted to start a war, they would do it, with a first strike massive bombardment against enemy military positions, and they would do it by surprise, instead of pushing boats around in disputed territory and then waiting and hoping they could survive whatever the US throws against them.

      Your sitting here talking about the weird legal status of the particular countries. Legal status only vaguely relates to reality, which is why companies labeled as non-profit often aren't really non-profit, and not every place that is labeled a church is really a church. Learn to deal with reality, not with labels.

      --
      Qxe4
  22. In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iran discovers cure for AIDS.

  23. Low tech but effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The breakthrough was made with a hammer and a small amount of nitroglycerin. The reaction released a great deal of energy and as soon as they can aford a new hammer they hope to continue testing.

    1. Re:Low tech but effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go home Yankee DOG!
      Running dogs of imperialism.
      You brow my HAMMAH! Now you DIE!

    2. Re:Low tech but effective by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The breakthrough was made with a hammer and a small amount of nitroglycerin.

      That's American FUD. The amount of nitroglycerin involved was, in fact, the largest ever used in such a reaction anywhere - which is yet another glorious achievement of Juche!

  24. It's just kimchi and soju . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . eat and drink enough of that, and your breath can cause nuclear fusion.

    . . . and you don't even want to know about "The Day After" . . .

    . . . that picture is not a fake . . . Mr. Kim has just "let one rip" . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:It's just kimchi and soju . . . by unixguy43 · · Score: 1

      . . . that picture is not a fake . . . Mr. Kim has just "let one rip" . . .

      They just photoshopped out the guy behind him- holding his nose and lighting it.....

  25. Great by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

    So now DPRK propaganda makes it to slashdot?

    I can live with that, but I really want to know where I can buy a pair of those glasses. It was only a month ago when they revealed that Kim Jong Il was setting fashion trends around the world, so I'd like to sport those glasses. The retro aviator style glasses are out, Kim Jong Il's glasses are IN.

    1. Re:Great by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      NK General: Try one of these North Korean stories, ambassador, they're pretty good.
      /. Ambassador: Thank you, no. I do not support the propaganda of Commie stooges.
      NK General: Oh, only Imperialist stooges, ay?
      President Taco: Gentlemen, you can't argue in here! This is a discussion forum!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  26. The nose knows by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    He's fused clown essence. Something smells funny.

  27. Low budget by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    If you listen to some people, the west has been wasting a lot of money on things like ITER, when some cheaper, less brute-force, approaches could work better. If they're right, then a country that doesn't have the resources to try the large-scale experiments might have more success.

    On the other hand, given the veracity of past press releases from North Korea, this reactor might be powered by powdered unicorn.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Low budget by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      On the other hand, given the veracity of past press releases from North Korea, this reactor might be powered by powdered unicorn.

      In North Korea, only old people use powdered unicorn... for arthritis.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Low budget by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Damnit - the real reason Apple stuff is so expensive. The Unicorn supply is finite, you know.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Low budget by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      No, they use earthworm for that.

      Efficacious Medicines Developed
      Pyongyang, April 1 (KCNA) --

      The Natural Medicine Research Institute of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has of late developed medicines with natural Koryo medicinal materials.

      Alposin, a nutritive liquid better than well-known Albesin, has a virtue for unconsciousness, poor appetite, weakness before and after operations and acute and chronic wasting diseases.

      The institute has also manufactured capsules with earthworm, potent for preventing thrombus, and an injection for curing acute and chronic rheumatic arthritis and pains caused by various diseases. It is now deepening research into the pharmacological actions of hypericum to develop a sedative and into the separation of pigments from natural plants to use them for the production of medicines and foodstuffs.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  28. Star at birth by schmidt349 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In ancient Greece and Rome, it wasn't unusual for someone to claim either that a new star appeared in the sky to herald a great person's birth or that they became a star following their death. This latter claim is known as catasterism and was pretty popular from the time of the Hellenistic kings to the Julio-Claudian dynasty at Rome.

    Catasterism is a frequent subject on coin portraits, with a star positioned about the portrait of the ruler. There is a very famous series of coins depicting Augustus fastening a star above the head of Marcellus, the man he had hoped would succeed him.

    Of course the import of all of this is that, as with so much else, North Korea is about 2,000 years behind the times.

    1. Re:Star at birth by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course the import of all of this is that, as with so much else, North Korea is about 2,000 years behind the times.

      No kidding. Everyone knows supernovae are where it's at these days.

      "Your guy became a star when he died? Neat. Our guy fucking blew one up!"

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    2. Re:Star at birth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For anyone wanting to see an interesting look at North Korea, check out the Vice Travel Guide series on their trip to North Korea. Awesome, as is most of their stuff (Check out the Liberia one if you want to feel sad about humanity).

        North Korea Part 1

  29. Dear Leader by operagost · · Score: 1

    Dear Leader should focus his awesome power on KEEPING HIS PEOPLE FROM STARVING.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Dear Leader by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how many Harley Davidson's that would cost?

  30. Was expecting an Onion article by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    I guess they didn't say it was useful fusion so I guess they could have fused some atoms in a reactor.

  31. Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...As you can't make a fusion reactor out of two feet of rusty chicken wire, some rocks, three peach pits, a bent nail, and a leather shoe with little bites taken out of it.

    Stone-age country is stone age.

  32. I for one... by celibate+for+life · · Score: 1

    ... welcome our new Zerg overlords. Kekekekekekek

  33. What else have they announced? by jcr · · Score: 1

    Didn't they claim to have cured cancer at some point, too?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  34. This is pretty much how we'll know. by weston · · Score: 1

    If North Korea's done this in any meaningful way, then their economic troubles are over. They won't be asking for aid or concessions, they'll be getting rich selling energy and possibly even technology. They won't be testing missiles, they'll be developing frickin' laser beams.

    I have my doubts, though.

    1. Re:This is pretty much how we'll know. by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Would their problems be over? If it's something NK can produce, then it's a matter of a clever trick, not sophistocated technology. If they sold one to anyone else, then the secret gets out, and the game is over. If they don't sell one to anyone else, all they can sell is electrical power. And transmission technology limits how much and how far you could sell infinitely cheap power until it becomes cheaper to just generate it locally with Coal. Even if it's true, it seems kind of like a cave-man with a steam engine. It doesn't really solve all their problems.

    2. Re:This is pretty much how we'll know. by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      There's a few hundred million people within 500 miles of the border. I don't see limited market as a possible problem.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  35. North Korean energy solution by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, North Korea has already done an amazing job of keeping down energy use. By restricting electricity to a handful of elites and starving everyone else, they've been able to reduce their carbon footprint to almost nothing. Just look at the results. Glorious leader has produced a much more efficient country than that wasteful South Korea!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:North Korean energy solution by zill · · Score: 1

      Judging by how many North Koreans perish from starvation every year, I think it's safe to say that their carbon footprint is actually negative.

    2. Re:North Korean energy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of like high speed internet in the West?

  36. It's true! yesterday I teleported to N. Korea by Michael_gr · · Score: 1

    and witnessed the experiment myself! If you don't believe me, just ask my good friend Chiron the centaur. He saw it too.

  37. Hahaha!! Everyone have a good laugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, N. Korean political prisoners are having chemical weapons tested on them at Camp 22, and the population is starving. Hahaha, so funny, right?!?!?!?

  38. eat repulsor-ray imperialist running-dog beeotches by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    This just in, Kim Il-sung suffering from palladium poisoning.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  39. Cool! I'm getting a home unit. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2, Funny

    They *laughed* when I said my Christmas decorations would wow them this year!

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Cool! I'm getting a home unit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mom: Oh, I get it now, Honey. But kid, are you sure you our Christmas tree can
      handle this "star" device you are making?

  40. Re:Microsoft Announces Achieving by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, in NK it's "Word To Your Motherland."

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  41. Aye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a wagon.

  42. North Korean energy crisis solved! by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    There was a small problem with reactor. There is no more North Korea. Film at 11. Now, the latest sports scores. Back to you Mike!

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  43. A "vaporware" tag? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Isn't this more like "plasmaware"?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:A "vaporware" tag? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      *Whoosh*

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  44. Re:Hahaha!! Everyone have a good laugh! by localman57 · · Score: 1

    How is not laughing at this press release going to solve those problems?

  45. W T F... by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So you upgraded slashdot to accept custom icons, but still can't find the time to accept unicode in comments?

    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    1. Re:W T F... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      UTF-8 isn't really important in English language.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  46. Hans Brix? Oh no! by stazeii · · Score: 1

    Kim Jong Il: Hans, Hans, Hans! We've been frew this a dozen times. I don't have any weapons of mass destwuction, OK Hans?

  47. jinkies! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Combine this with his deadly panthers, and I'm all scared, Scoob!

  48. The most important question to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have 1.21 jiggawatts?

  49. Corrigendum by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Upon consultation with actual Koreans, it turns out that the original press release said that North Korea had "nuked a Frusion".

    The BBC apologizes for this error.

    1. Re:Corrigendum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now i'm lost, so the press release should have said that North Koreal had "fruked a Nusion"?

    2. Re:Corrigendum by hipifreq · · Score: 1

      Those responsible for the error have been sacked

  50. North Korea is BEST KOREA! by Improv · · Score: 3, Funny

    How could we doubt someone with sunglasses that are so cool?

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:North Korea is BEST KOREA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never, never, NEVER doubted David Caruso.

  51. bah.. this is the death of the free market economy by haschka · · Score: 1

    Probably those petrol firms that are in the fortune 500's and a mayor player in every western state have prevented that free market economy builds it..

  52. Never Underestimate Bad News by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    They may have a hydrogen bomb.

  53. Idle by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    The North Korean government makes an announcement, and it gets reported on Idle.

    Well, I can think of worse places for it to be reported, I guess...

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  54. real war.. by haschka · · Score: 1

    This would also mean that petrol driven states would probably attack soon, as in iraq..

  55. Some may call it a small thermonuclear reactor .. by burni2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I call it H-BOMB

  56. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it controlled reaction or uncontrolled?

    1. Re:simple by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      AFAWK, North Korea hasn't even achieved uncontrolled fusion yet. All their atomic tests to date have employed enriched uranium as a fissile material. So that means they are ~60 years behind the US and USSR, and ~5 years ahead of Iran.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:simple by confused+one · · Score: 1

      and this is a good thing...

  57. Parked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    parked in geosynchronous

    That's like saying a juggler "parked" a ball in a nice circular pattern of movement.

    I think you meant geostationary. This is a lot more like parking, since the satellite would seem to stand still (to an observer on the ground) while the other stars move. Of course, that would make it a bit too conspicuous to be a good spy satellite.

    1. Re:Parked? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In principle, any orbit with a period equal to the Earth's rotational period is technically geosynchronous; however, the term is often used to refer to the special case of a geosynchronous orbit that is circular (or nearly circular) and at zero (or nearly zero) inclination, that is, directly above the equator. This is customarily called a geostationary orbit.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Parked? by init100 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course, that would make it a bit too conspicuous to be a good spy satellite.

      In addition, even the ultra-high-resolution cameras in spy satellites would probably not be of that much use from geostationary orbit (GEO), since GEO is very far away (~36,000 km). Spy satellites are likely put in a polar Low Earth Orbit (LEO) at approx. 200 km altitude. This gives much more detailed images, and also allows the satellite to cover the entire Earth without spending any fuel.

    3. Re:Parked? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Tundra Orbits and the like are pretty popular for spy satellites, but honestly I'm not sure that would work well for North Korea, they are at a relatively low latitude. I wouldn't be surprised if someone had a geosync satellite parked near North Korea as an early warning system. Such a high orbit would not be very good for general spy satellite tasks, but at the same time you don't want to have periods of time you aren't monitoring a country like that for launches.

      tl;dr: There are likely a shitton of sats watching North Korea, at least some of them are probably geosync.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    4. Re:Parked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geo orbit could be very useful for a synthetic aperture optical system that achieves extreme optical resolution by coherent combination of light from widely separated optics. It's been done in Terrestrial systems. Have a little fun, calculate the minimum feature resolution of a synthetic aperture optical system in geo with its mirrors separated by 10 Km (notionally, at least 3 orders of magnitude bigger than any spysat mirror diameters in LEO). Think about how easy it is to build actively stabilized large structures for big optical systems in space. Oh, and then go outside and look South (if you're in the Northern hemisphere) so we can see your eye color. What exactly did you think was happening with the black budgets, anyway?

    5. Re:Parked? by arisvega · · Score: 1

      In addition, even the ultra-high-resolution cameras in spy satellites would probably not be of that much use from geostationary orbit (GEO), since GEO is very far away

      I tend to disagree- the biggest factor that craps up the imagery is the atmospheric distortion, and adaptive optics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_optics can work miracles on compensating for that. I do not doubt that there can be many low-orbit spy satellites, but then a very elegant tracking system would have to be used to get a video of this Great Leader taking a dump. On a geostationary orbit, I would assume you need to point the camera(s) only once.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    6. Re:Parked? by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      In addition, even the ultra-high-resolution cameras in spy satellites would probably not be of that much use from geostationary orbit (GEO), since GEO is very far away (~36,000 km). Spy satellites are likely put in a polar Low Earth Orbit (LEO) at approx. 200 km altitude. This gives much more detailed images, and also allows the satellite to cover the entire Earth without spending any fuel. Whoosh!

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    7. Re:Parked? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      the biggest factor that craps up the imagery is the atmospheric distortion,

      Not untrue.

      and adaptive optics can work miracles on compensating for that.

      But not particularly helpful in this situation.

      How do AO systems work (in general)? By reconstructing the shape of the wavefront reaching the sensor array from a known point source in the field of view, and then introducing a complementary distortion into an optical element which will render the point source back to being a point (OK, an Airy disc) on the main sensor array. Which is great for astronomy - there's usually a star (which is generally close enough to a point source to be used as one for this purpose) in any random field of view. If you don't have a suitable star in your FoV ... then you shine a laser operating in the waveband that you're interested in parallel to the axis of your optical system, and enough will reflect to give you a point source.

      Now look at it from the ground. Somewhere around your Beloved Leader, there are lots of shiny little ping pong balls, glittering in the sunlight. How utterly unremarkable is that? Or you see this bright light stationary in the sky. Stationary, day and night. It's monochromatic. It's collimated. How utterly unremarkable is that?

      OK, perhaps the spooks have got around this. But not with conventional AO.

      (If my physics is wrong ... hey, tell me. I could do with learning something new today!)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  58. At Last With The Power Of Fusion by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    The people of North Korea will have enough light to read Shakespeare in the original Hangul.

    1. Re:At Last With The Power Of Fusion by MasterPatricko · · Score: 1

      You are aware that "Shakespeare" was just a pseudonym of the Dear Leader, I hope? The Dear Leader wrote all literature ever.

      --
      I'd tell a UDP joke, but you may not get it. I'd tell a TCP joke, but I'd have to keep repeating it until you got it.
  59. Re:Some may call it a small thermonuclear reactor by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    We should share some of ours with them.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  60. What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A few years ago N Korea detonated a gigantic explosion that it claimed was nuclear (fission). Now it's claiming controlled fusion.

    These claims are impossible to believe, since N Korea lies about so much. But it did demonstrate a gigantic explosion. What in fact is going on there in N Korea?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by localman57 · · Score: 2

      Maybe I missed one, but wasn't it only gigantic for small values of gigantic?

    2. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      But it did demonstrate a gigantic explosion. What in fact is going on there in N Korea?

      What North Korea?

    3. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Um, they demonstrated a fission device. Ignore NK statements; seismographic stations around the world confirmed it. Nuclear explosions have distinct signatures that make it impossible to either conceal or bluff a test.

      You may be thinking of a previous claim of fission device testing which seismographic stations confirmed was just a big conventional explosion.

      BTW, the actual nuclear blast was quite small, around half a kT, meaning either they had mastered the challenging process of making very small fission devices on their first go, or they screwed up a conventional-sized weapon and it only partially fissioned.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the one in 2006 that was estimated to be somewhere close to a kiloton in power. That's kinda small for a nuke, but still gigantic for an explosion.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Kinda small for a nuke? US, Great Britain and Soviet all had tests that fizzled had larger net outputs than this less-than-a-kiloton (one of the superpower "fizzle" tests was over 250 kilotons!) "success" claimed by North Korea. One kiloton is PUNY for a nuke, not "kinda small."

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by gamecrusader · · Score: 1

      now can we nuke North Korea?
      they have admitted to having nuclear devices this is the perfect time to declare war and declare them a threat to the world. yes people will die yes civilians will die but whats a few million casualties when we have a world to protect from a country such as north korea.
      yes there will be casualties but turn their state into a waste land,

    7. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      No, these are puny nukes. As the original poster said, ~kiloton is on the low end (though estimates of the yield actually range from 800 tons to 12 kilotons), but it's still quite a large blast when compared to *any* conventional explosives, nor was it the smallest nuke by a long shot.

    8. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gigantic explosion was a runaway Prius hitting a large sealed box car full of coal dust sitting next to Kim Jong Il. He needed the explosion wave to do his hair.

    9. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about a nuclear bomb or a thermonuclear one?

      Are you sure the 250 kiloton was just a standard heavy metals fission device, not a hydrogen bomb? Because 1 kiloton is a very adequate power of a simple, rugged, rudimentary nuclear bomb.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    10. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      All the same, in the game of tit-for-tat North Korea would lose in the nuclear version of knifey-spoony. :D

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    11. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of scale of the observer. The sun is minuscule compared to the galaxy. Some slightly less massive explosions are equally impressive to a person of Kim Jong Il's stature.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    12. Re:What *Are* They Doing in N Korea? by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      Depends on what the purpose of the sub-kiloton blast was for. They may have been testing a thermonuclear primary...most of these are sub-kiloton in yield. But then they kick off the secondary fusion stage...

      More than likely it was just a standard atomic bomb fizzle, but there is the possibility that they were reaching for an h-bomb.

  61. ...In a ONN Interview... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ( The Korean Official shows the tv crew a open warehouse ) This is new DPRK research facility! Top Line research here!

    (Camera continues to pan empty space until two korean men about twenty feet apart looking determined at each other)

    Here we make first Fusion breakthrough for DPRK!

    (The men scream and run at each other until they crash and fall over unconsious)

    It very difficult to reprodu... reproduce, admittedly we have had failures.

    (The official signals the guard to intervene and drag the crashing men to their feet. Camera follows DPRK Official as they stroll away from the fusion experiment. )

    But the DPRK are confident we are first to produce free energy for the glorious...

    (The official is drown out by the screams of the men again, this time with a small explosion! The Camera swings back to the Fusion Experiment area to find sets of smoking shoes on the floor and a scorch mark!)

    (The Official comes back into view with a ear to ear grin.)

    Another victory for the DPRK!

  62. Someone should show them by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Someone should show them what REAL fusion looks like, by dropping an H-bomb in his lap...

    --
    LRN 2 SWM
    1. Re:Someone should show them by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you say that you wanted a bomb? We deliver.

  63. egos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would be funny if most of the political and business leaders of the world didn't have similar kind of fantasy egos.
    "Make fusion or die!"
    Yes-sir, when when would you like that done?

  64. In other news... by Tobenisstinky · · Score: 1

    North Korea has perfected a marijuana plant with 100 times the normal levels of THC.

    --
    wha'? where am i?
  65. creditable evidence by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Considering the guy skipped town shortly before the announcement (he was in China) I would venture to say that there's some amount of creditability to the announcement. (He wasn't about to take a chance and stick around when the fusion experiment might reduce North Korea to a giant crater.)

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  66. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Phrogman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know this is going to offend some people, but since most of the mythology around Jesus Christ is already borrowed from other mythological traditions, I expect that this is the origin of the Star of Bethlehem that is supposed to have appeared over Joshua Bar Joseph's birthplace when he was born. It would make sense for early Christians to have borrowed this story as well if it would help make their religion more popular with the Romano-Graecian population in the near east.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  67. Outsourcing by simonbas · · Score: 1

    We should start outsourcing the development of Duke Nukem Forever to them, it would be done in no time...

  68. Translation: by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    "We built a Fusor from old Chinese TVs"

  69. In North Korea... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    In Communist North Korea, hydrogen and helium fuse you!

  70. Sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should share some of ours with them.

    No. we should share with them, A LOT of ours, in their most densely populated areas.

  71. unique device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pressed to achieve results or die, NK scientists presented the leader with their new unique device.
    You place it in sunlight to initiate the reaction:
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/lights/994a/

    Larger models expected in the near future.

  72. Does this mean by treeves · · Score: 1

    that N. Korea is going to be able to have some lights on now?

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  73. I Called It! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Read here for details.

  74. Fusion is easy. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note that experimenters have built Tokamaks and achieved fusion. Fusion is easy. Getting more power out than is put in is difficult.

    1. Re:Fusion is easy. by DarkSabreLord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      that's actually not that difficult at all. Hydrogen bombs are uncontrolled fusion in action. Now, producing usable energy, however...

    2. Re:Fusion is easy. by Sperbels · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that's actually not that difficult at all. Hydrogen bombs are uncontrolled fusion in action. Now, producing usable energy, however...

      Well, according to the BBC article it says they build a "unique thermo-nuclear reaction device". Technically, NK could be referring to a hydrogen bomb.

    3. Re:Fusion is easy. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've got my own fusion reactor. I recover energy from it with photovoltaic cells on the top of my house.

    4. Re:Fusion is easy. by drunkahol · · Score: 1

      It's not yours . . . give it back!

    5. Re:Fusion is easy. by John+Guilt · · Score: 1

      Douglas-Martin power cells?

    6. Re:Fusion is easy. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Douglas-Martin power cells?

      That takes me back, I think, to The roads must roll and Let there be light. A great story about patenting, that one. But I had to google it to be sure, its been a long time.

      We are about 40% of the way to the efficiency Heinlein gave those panels, which is pretty good. My wife is an architect and our house if full of catalogues for cladding products for buildings. I would love to see those catalogues include materials which can generate power.

    7. Re:Fusion is easy. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hey, an H-Bomb produces usable energy.

      Usable only for one purpose, but still usable.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Fusion is easy. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Traitor! Throw him to jail! As we all know the Sun only belongs to the Glorious Leader (tm)!

      And now all together! Nananananananana LEADER!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  75. 'unique thermo-nuclear reaction device.' by w0mprat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is concievable they have hooked up some kind of fission reaction (plausible for NK) to drive a fusion reaction (trivially easy) for purposes of propaganda. Dear Leader is probably even unaware of the lack of net energy generation from the fusion reaction. I go further to suggest the NK 'scientists' themselves are not aware.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  76. Correction: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I should have said "garage" experimenters.

  77. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by halivar · · Score: 1

    An interesting conjecture. I think that's not the reason though, for the following:

    So far as we know, the oldest account of the birth of Christ is the gospel of John, fragments of which are dated as early as 125 AD. This indicates that the original first copy is probably before 100 AD, during the so-called "apostolic age", during which followers of Christ still focused on converting within expatriate Jewish communities, since they still viewed themselves as a Jewish sect. This is also the reason why I do not believe that the early Christian church "borrowed" the crucifixion story from Bacchanal mythology, as is widely believed in some history-buff circles.

  78. OK, turning in my geek card,,, by jeko · · Score: 1

    I can't figure out if you're referencing Luke Skywalker or the Doctor, since Ender and Khan merely destroyed planets, while the Monolith creators made a star. Or are you talking about Arthur C Clarke's short story, "the Star?" Both the Vorlons and the Ancients were rumored to be working on this, but never got it done.

    OK, I bow to your superior Geek cred. Who blew up a star?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:OK, turning in my geek card,,, by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Stargate SG1.

    2. Re:OK, turning in my geek card,,, by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Joke's on you! It wasn't a reference. It was just a hypothetical quote. :P

      No wait, it was from, umm...some amazing book you haven't heard of, but it would change your life forever if you had! I think Ayn Rand ghost-wrote it for Ernest Hemmingway, who was credited as an author in conjunction with George Lucas.

      Life-changing. It was called, "The Old Man Shrugged: A New Pope"

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
  79. "offend some people." Ya think? by jeko · · Score: 2, Funny

    The second-most popular Christmas story after Santa Claus was nonsense PR spin?

    Gee, why leave it half done? Got any gay porn starring Mohammed you'd like to post? :-)

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:"offend some people." Ya think? by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I’m a Christian, and I wasn’t offended.

      I think he’s incorrect, but I’m not offended by his theory.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:"offend some people." Ya think? by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      I was trying my best to raise my opinion on something someone else pointed out without causing offense as best I could - but for many people the story of Jesus is too close to their hearts for them to take a rational and logical point of view on it and have a fact related discussion. I didn't want to offend those people, and hoped to find those who would be capable of discussing things without breaking out their firearms and heading north for my apartment up here in Canada :P People take the story of Jesus as (pun intended) Gospel Truth. They don't question it, they don't examine it etc. Now, I know there are thousands of Biblical scholars out there doing exactly that of course, but the common person in North American society - whether they are actually Christian or not - never gives a seconds thought to how valid/substantiated the story of Jesus is. To me its pure Myth, but there is nothing wrong with that IMHO either. Its just not my myth. Lots of folks are incapable of raising any discussion of the subject whatsoever and feel threatened by the possibility that someone else might have a different opinion.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    3. Re:"offend some people." Ya think? by Creedo · · Score: 1

      Well, he was nice enough not to say that ALL of Christianity was a nonsense PR spin, which makes him nicer than me.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    4. Re:"offend some people." Ya think? by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      I have no desire to ridicule anyone's religion. That wasn't my purpose. no.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    5. Re:"offend some people." Ya think? by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. Despite popular opinion, not all us Christians are crazy, closed-minded, irrational, judgemental people. The ones who are... well, we can't really talk any sense into them either. Even about Biblical things. Anything contrary to the conclusion they've come to is ALL WRONG and they'll hear none of it. It's really quite frustrating at times, especially since we often all end up being tarred with the same brush in the mainstream.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
  80. The Foundation? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    You know, I immediately remembered Asimov's Foundation series, where the First Foundation (the technological one) was built on a planet with limited resources for a reason, that the scientists would have to work out how to survive with the bare minimum and work on miniaturization of everything, the tiny personal nuclear powered energy shields, plasma cutters etc. Is it at all possible that in North Korea the conditions are such, that they would have to figure out such things, how to live with bare minimum resources and in an insane dictatorial political system that does not tolerate anything that's out of the main Party line.

    Then again, that very last part of the last sentence is probably the main reason why it is most unlikely that any real scientific breakthroughs are possible in that political system. Too much pressure for scientists to claim any achievement as their own causes too much jealousy and people would not really cooperate for the fear of having their stuff stolen, while others, who are good at getting into power are the ones most likely to steal from the real achievers and then to set them up for some sort of a political treason so that nobody would argue with their claims.

    No, they would not have a breakthrough greater than what has been achieved already by now.

    1. Re:The Foundation? by Xveers · · Score: 1

      But then again, the First Foundataion had access to the cutting edge of Empire tech, such as it was. And the developmental freedom to build on that tech to make more miniaturized hardware...

      Don't see dear leader's hut having THAT...

  81. This just in by damnfuct · · Score: 2, Funny

    The design uses Duke Nukem Forever as an operating system..

  82. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new ways are like wallpaper.
    From across the room everything looks completely different; run your hand over it and you can feel the old ways just beneath the surface.

  83. Con-fusion? by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    Maybe they are doing Dr. B. Stanley Pons Dr. Martin Fleischmann experiment in jar all over again

    http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/050399sci-cold-fusion.html
    http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/1258

  84. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or, perhaps God planned it on purpose exactly like that, so that the “magi from the East” would recognise Jesus’ birth and come to worship him, fulfilling prophecies such as Isaiah 60:3.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  85. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Obviously, he would have used a sign that pagan astrologers would recognise as the birth of a king. Hence, the star.)

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  86. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the reply, all the more so for it being informative and not dismissive. I am far from a Biblical scholar of course - first off because I am not Christian, Jewish nor Muslim in any sense - but whether or not they were focusing on converting members of existing Jewish communities or not, I don't see that that necessarily limits their ability to borrow from other mythological traditions that were present in the area at the time. The myth of death and resurrection was a common theme in the middle east as far back as the Egyptians at least, and I think it likely that that was borrowed so to speak from other religious traditions. Many elements of Mithracism are common with Christianity if I am not mistaken, and it ended up being one of the major rivals for the dominant religion in the Roman Empire I believe.
    After all if John is the earliest account of the birth of Christ, it was written at least 100 years after the actual event - assuming Jesus existed at all - and that is plenty of time for the event to have received some embellishment in the retelling.
    Understand, I am not saying that someone deliberately rewrote history to include key elements like the virgin birth, the star over his birthplace etc, just that in retelling a tale over 100 years its entirely possible for it to be embellished with elements that were common to comparable religious mythology in other religions. A sort of religious keeping up with the Joneses so to speak.
    According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus), the book of John begins to cover the life of Christ when he was baptized by John the Baptist. The other gospels which do cover his birth and earlier years are of later origin apparently. Now, a good deal of Jesus life seems to have consisted of him fulfilling various prophecies that indicated he was the Messiah of Jewish tradition. It seems to me that Jesus went out of his way to ensure that he fulfilled those key prophetic requirements (elaborate preparations so he could ride into Jerusalem on an ass etc). Giving him a virgin birth and having a star appear overhead - if those were prophesied by earlier Jewish Prophets - would seem to me to be essential elements of his story that would be shoehorned in (if they didn't already exist) by later writers - particularly if they were attempting to convert existing Jewish communities.

    I only mention all of the above because it was mentioned that this "star overhead" element was apparently popular in Pagan traditions in Europe and the Middle East. I believe the stories of Christianity (and other religious traditions of course) should be given the same treatment as any mythology of non-"People of the Book" type religions get. All to often we in western culture seem to sneer at Roman or Greek (or Norse etc) mythology and religion and treat them less seriously than we do Christianity, Judaism or Islam, and seem to forget that for those people, their religion offered the same solace, strength and morals that later religions that displaced them do today. Just because something is a myth doesn't make it any less valid in religious terms IMHO. Myths have been the cornerstones of religion and culture for centuries. Its really only in the last two millennia that we have had religions that insisted their version was the only truth to be had, and that killing people for denying that was a moral value.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  87. Re:eat repulsor-ray imperialist running-dog beeotc by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    That's pretty much anyone that's played the game actually.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  88. Nor should we be. by jeko · · Score: 1

    Nor do I think the original poster was trying to be offensive. But come on, you have to admit that if you start taking potshots at the Little Drummer Boy, some Shiite Baptist from Dallas is going to build up a full head of steam. :-)

    I miss Molly Ivins.
     

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Nor should we be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But come on, you have to admit that you're nothing but a fucking troll.

  89. What would be funny .. by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    What would be funny would have been if the comment got modded insightful.

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB
  90. Beloved Leader orders atoms to meld! by swschrad · · Score: 3, Funny

    As all universe obeys Beloved Leader, atoms fused, creating clean, pure energy with no neutrons, no MSG, and no trans-fats.

    Wonderful new creation for used in distillation of brandy.

    -- babelfish from Nut Korean World News

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  91. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by turgid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why did God make the half-lives of U-238 and U-235 just so?

  92. Ah. by jeko · · Score: 1

    My local cable company hasn't played the series that far for me yet. Thanks.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  93. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Creedo · · Score: 1

    I treat them with exactly the same reverence, personally. That is to say, none at all.

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
  94. Gunga galunga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, after posting a -38 as a golf virgin what's a little nuclear fusion? That kind of thing can be done over the weekend.

  95. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The universe is actually an enormous practical joke.

  96. Smilie, people, I used the smilie, see? :-) by jeko · · Score: 1

    Hi Phrogman,

    No, it's OK, I'm personally not offended. And it's not so much that you took a shot at Christianity as it is that you took a shot at that wonderful pagan holiday Christmas, man. People get a little unhinged when they hear the validity of Frosty and Rudolph called into question.

    BTW, your Boss Ebenezer called. He says you're fired. :-)

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  97. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm a muslim and I'm offended by your theory, if you don't apologize immediately and convert to the religion of peace I will stab you to death.

  98. enormous practical joke by jeko · · Score: 1

    No, they apologized for the inconvenience, remember?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  99. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by halivar · · Score: 1

    Its really only in the last two millennia that we have had religions that insisted their version was the only truth to be had, and that killing people for denying that was a moral value.

    It has long been my belief that no one has ever killed for religion. At least, not really in their secret hearts. "God told me to do it" is merely an excuse for petty tyrants and barbarians to help themselves to what they REALLY want: the resources and land of their neighbors. For instance, were the Crusades about rescuing Jerusalem from Islam? Or were they about the fact that middle east was a vital hub on the "silk road?"

  100. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why did you feel it necessary to bring up a completely unrelated topic just to mock my belief in God?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  101. Re:End of Year Holiday Season by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    Oh you misunderstand. I am in fact Pagan by religious preference, so I am perfectly happy to celebrate Yule, have a tree etc. I just didn't mention that in my earlier comments because it tends to get people focused on my religion, not on my comments concerning religion in general or in this case Christianity. I don't expect people to treat my religion seriously - and when you see some of the lunatics that call themselves Pagan I don't blame them - but I also don't want to have the conversation devolve into "you will burn in hell" type comments either. All i wanted was a rational discussion free of religious overtones - something many Christians have a very hard time accepting it seems (and no, I haven't spent any time discussing things with members of the Jewish faith or Muslims to make any comparison).
    From what I recall reading, the birth of Jesus was originally celebrated at a different time of the year, then moved to Christmas at a later date.

    Now back to data drawn from Wikipedia, I found the following: (here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_Jesus)

    "Some commentators have attempted to establish the date of birth by identifying the Star of Bethlehem with some known astronomical or astrological phenomenon.[6] There are many possible phenomena and none seems to match the Gospel account.[7] Many scholars regard the star as a literary invention of the author of the Gospel of Matthew, to claim fulfillment of an Old Testament prophecy (Numbers 24:17).[8]."

    Which would seem to say that many scholars agree with the Star of Bethlehem being a later addition to the story, and possibly with my assertion that the story was altered to make it fit the prophecies.

    As for the day of his birth, the article has these comments:

    "The New Testament provides no information regarding the date of the birth of Jesus.[10] The traditional date is 25 December, which is mid-winter in Judea. Because the Luke account says that shepherds were outdoors with their flocks it has sometimes been suggested that this implies a summer or autumn date.[11] However, the climate of Palestine is quite mild and in fact sheep are allowed to forage even in December.[11][12]

    Early Christians sought to calculate the date of Christ's birth based on the idea that Old Testament prophets died either on an anniversary of their birth or of their conception. They reasoned that Jesus died on an anniversary of his conception, so the date of his birth was nine months after the date of Good Friday, either December 25 or January 6."

    Which would be best summarized as "No one knows when he was born, and Dec 25th is based solely on numerological calculations". On the other hand Dec 25th is just as good a choice as any other day of the year :P

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  102. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought you were joking about god deliberately putting the star there for the benefit of the pagan astrologers. Sorry.

  103. Change "No one" to "Almost no one" and we're good by jeko · · Score: 1
    • Joan of Arc.
    • Torquemada.
    • the early, though not later, Knights Templar.
    • Heinrich Kramer, the man most directly responsible for touching off witch panics in Europe from 1487 forward through both his personal actions and his witch-hunting text "Malleus Maleficarum."
    • 19 men on September 11, 2001

    The list could be lengthened and debated endlessly...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  104. a note to north korea by gamecrusader · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dear North Korea
    please invest your time an energy in this new science but don't take any safety precautions, because hopefully you will destroy yoursleves and in the process set of a elctromagnetic pulse that will fry your electronics in all, please continue so we can watch you destroy yourselves, and give a reason for us to destroy your. making you a threat to the world giving everyone a reason to blow you to kingdom come.

    yours sincerely,
    Game Crusader

    1. Re:a note to north korea by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      You think it's citizens deserve to die along with the regime?

    2. Re:a note to north korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah

    3. Re:a note to north korea by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      you pray to Dear Leader too?

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  105. R: FALSE ALARM by gamecrusader · · Score: 1

    FALSE ALARM
    someone just made some ghost pepper hot sauce and ate it, just a result of eating ghost pepper hot sauce. nuclear fission and a new toilet required for it is now radioactive from the heat.

  106. RE: N. Korean technology by kheldan · · Score: 1

    'unique thermo-nuclear reaction device.'

    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/H-bomb_1.gif

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  107. Elisabeth Shue by cdn-programmer · · Score: 0

    So since when did Elisabeth Shue make a trip to North Korea?

  108. north korea is playing with fire by gamecrusader · · Score: 1

    with this nuclear fission, probably untrue. they are in away admitting to nuclear intentions and thermo nuclear weapons, plus their small arsenal
    "North Korea Saturday warned the United States and South Korea that it will employ "all means, including the nuclear deterrent" if they intrude into its territory."
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/rok/2010/rok-100424-voa01.htm

    just thought anyone should know whats up, you say somthing like that and the United States could start a war on a scale unknown to mankind, in my mind I could see such a thing happening with over a billion casualties, fighting all over the world an enemy with China, it would make WWII look like a skirmish billions dead trillions in damage, aresnals being rebuilt, thousands of square miles of untold destruction and waste lands, fires you can see from space, the United States Missile command actually going into operation, the white house getting hit the U.S. getting invaded for the first time in many years and wars unseen since the civil war and revolutionary wars, don't get me wrong but I can see in the near future the possibility of things gettin bad

  109. Exactly!? Besides the star thing wasn't literal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was that star thing literal? I never thought it was, sounded more like grasping to criticize something.... when there is far more one could pick. I don't remember any but I heard some similar nutty metaphor things for Bush back in 2000 that were about as bad (or worse since they exploited religion for it and that breaks a commandment.)

  110. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    Interestingly in the Bible account it's never said that the star was put there by God to honor Jesus. The story actually says that King Herod wanted to kill the baby Messiah that he believed would be born around that time. The "star" led the astrologers to Jerusalem first where they met Herod who pretended he wanted to visit the child himself. Then the "star" led them to the house where the young Jesus was. (No longer a baby) When they attempted to go back to the King an angelic vision tells them not to and to leave immediately.

    So either the star was schizophrenic, or actually trying to help Herod kill Jesus. It's quite a different story than the usual one you see at Xmas time. When you add in the clear Mosaic law commandments forbidding astrology and fortune telling, it makes the idea that the Jewish God invited the Magi a bit suspect.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  111. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why it doesn't display on ubuntu lucid with opera and chrome

  112. In related news.... by Broadband · · Score: 1

    Kim Jong-il can ride his bike with no handlebars.

    1. Re:In related news.... by crovira · · Score: 1

      He doesn't use a seat either. OUCH!!!

      --
      MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  113. STOP HATING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without countries like North Korea, americans could not live in the constant fear they long for everyday. What other reason will americans find to freely throw away their rights and privileges so they can yearn to live in a police state, and have their assets seized for trivial reasons? Americans should send North Korea's leader a thank you card.

  114. Necopracy by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    I do believe we can officially cross North Korea out as a "communist state" and put it in the Theocracy column. He is a god with Elvis at his right hand.... o.O

    Christopher Hitchen's, who has been to NK, describes it as; "The world's only necopracy".

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  115. The Dosadi Experiment... by crovira · · Score: 1

    A far more likely scenario would be Frank Herbert's Dosadi Experiment.

    But North Koreans are hardly going to be released on an unsuspecting universe like a plague of locust.

    More likely, since the entire country has a population that barely rivals most major capitals (25million for the whole schmeer) they will revert to barbarism and neanderthal living condition. (Sort of like in Papua New Guinea but with a bitchin' cold climate...)

    I would be more worried about them having enough fissionable materials to make a dirty bomb before I waste any sleep over their self-professed capacity to make clean thermo-nuclear fusion.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  116. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, actually I was serious.

    Isa. 60 is a passage which is a messianic prophecy. Like many messianic prophecies from the Old Testament, it does not clearly differentiate between the first coming of Jesus as a baby and his return in glory and his reign as predicted in Revelation, but it’s not too difficult to see where it switches over. Verses 1-3 refer to his birth:

    “Arise, shine, for your light has come,
    and the glory of the LORD rises upon you.

    See, darkness covers the earth
    and thick darkness is over the peoples,
    but the LORD rises upon you
    and his glory appears over you.

    Nations will come to your light,
    and kings to the brightness of your dawn.

    The magi, or kings, who came from the East, are considered by some to be a fulfillment of the prophecy in that last verse.

    Like I said elsewhere... I’m not offended by his theory, but I do think it is incorrect, and I figured I might as well post an alternate theory from a Christian perspective. Take it for whatever you feel it’s worth.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  117. He saw Jet Li do it and hey.. Kim's in shape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jet Li causing fusion...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i67Fe33lPqA

  118. Re:Change "No one" to "Almost no one" and we're go by halivar · · Score: 1

    I'll give you all those but Torquemada. The autos de fe was purely mercenary politics. The purpose was two-fold: to squash political dissidents, and to steal land, money, and business from affluent Jews and Arabs, mostly by killing them. Joan of Arc had religious convictions, herself, but she was manipulated by some pretty conniving, self-interested folks.

    But I see your point. Individuals will kill in the name of their diety. I was just trying to say that when it rises to the level of national policy dictated from a sovereign, there's probably an ulterior motive.

  119. It's Simple Really by oloron · · Score: 1

    It's a beowulf cluster of Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulators

  120. The land that forgot reality by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's almost as if everyone in that place between ten and sixty has been lost forever to a cult and know nothing else. However Idon'tknow much, I've only met one person from that place and they lost all communication from anyone in North Korea twenty years or more ago - despite it just being on the other side of a river and depite leaving the place legally. North Korea used to export food to China but things changed to less than subsistence a long time ago.

  121. Re:Change "No one" to "Almost no one" and we're go by jeko · · Score: 1

    I was just trying to say that when it rises to the level of national policy dictated from a sovereign, there's probably an ulterior motive

    Absolutely.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  122. Bazooka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chuck Norris should be really scared now...

  123. Yes, but .. by arisvega · · Score: 1

    .. does it run Linux?

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  124. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did you feel the need to bring up your belief in a god? Why do you feel that people should refrain from mocking controversial positions if they don't agree with them? What makes your position so special that it should be exempt from criticism?

    Also, your notion that biblical prophecy is most likely correct, while ludicrous and therefore amusing, is also highly tangential to the topic at hand. Glass houses, hmm?

  125. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Why did you feel the need to bring up your belief in a god?

    I was merely responding to a comment posted by someone else, theorizing about the meaning of the star over Bethlehem.

    Why do you feel that people should refrain from mocking controversial positions if they don't agree with them? What makes your position so special that it should be exempt from criticism?

    That’s a very nice straw man, but I didn’t say that. I merely asked why he had to bring a completely off-topic question to the argument so as to do it.

    Also, your notion that biblical prophecy is most likely correct, while ludicrous and therefore amusing, is also highly tangential to the topic at hand. Glass houses, hmm?

    I’m sorry, were you directing your comment at him? The guy who started theorizing about the meaning of the star in Christian “mythology” on a topic about North Korea?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  126. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    It was all a series of events set up by God and perfectly orchestrated to fulfill prophecy. All of it was foretold, and the purpose of the prophecy was to make it so unmistakable when Messiah finally came that people would be utterly without excuse for missing it... which they did.

    Furthermore the notion that the magi showed up on the night of Jesus birth is incorrect. Yes, you’ll typically see the Nativity scene with the brightly-lit barn, a few oxen and donkeys, some sheep, shepherds, and the wee three kings. That’s relatively far from the truth.

    The Bible does say that the star appeared when Jesus was born, not before. Obviously the Magi (also referred to as kings... basically, the educated ruling aristocracy of their culture) didn’t arrive until later because they had a lengthy journey to undergo to get there... and the Bible does not, in fact, say exactly when they arrived. In fact, it specifically says the Magi (it doesn’t tell how many) arrived after Jesus was born.

    After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem and asked, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and have come to worship him.” — Matthew 2:1-2

    Herod then finds out from the Magi when the star had appeared (i.e., when Jesus had been born)... and used this information to try to kill Jesus, when the Magi didn’t come back to tell him where to find the baby:

    When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi. — Matthew 2:16

    Furthermore, the Magi followed the star to pay their honours to Jesus’ birth in fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah:

    Nations will come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your dawn. — Isa. 60:3

    And Herod’s actions and the escape to Egypt of Jesus’ parents and the baby were in preparation to fulfill another prophecy as well:

    out of Egypt I called my son — Hosea 11:1b

    As far as your opinion that the idea of the Magi getting invited is suspect... well, why? Yes, sorcery and astrology were forbidden... but not because they were make-believe or stage magic; it was clearly indicated that they had real supernatural force. In fact, in 1 Samuel 28:3-20, we read about King Saul’s visit to a medium who successfully called forth the spirit of the prophet Samuel (who appeared none too happy at being disturbed... probably not least because it was done in flagrant violation to God’s commands, thus bringing even more of God’s judgment upon Saul and the nation of Israel).

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  127. Re:Thus the star over Bethlehem then by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    Why did God make the half-lives of U-238 and U-235 just so?

    Because, hoo-boy would it be an interesting planet to live on if all our uranium deposits were being thrust up to the surface at 90% enrichment.

  128. So, Pistol shrimps managed to break embargo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and now North Korea has fusion capability.