Slashdot Mirror


Revenge of the Cable Customer

crimeandpunishment writes "After years of poor service and poor reception, years of hoping the cable guy shows up sometime within that four-hour window, years of constant price increases ... it may be payback time for cable customers. Cable TV companies are trying to treat customers better. Considering the industry has long had some of the worst customer satsfaction ratings of any industry, it may take a while to overcome that reputation. But they'd better succeed. Cable customers are switching to satellite and phone companies in droves. According to industry research, cable companies lost five million video customers from 2006 to 2009."

397 comments

  1. I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by selven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's called replacing cable, satellite and everything else with just the internet.

    1. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also known as turning off the TV and experiencing the truly wonderful show known as "real life". It can be boring at times, but the upsides are worth waiting for.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by selven · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're correcting my mistake and you can't even spell intarwebz correctly?

      Buddy, this is Slashdot

      Oh, that explains it.

    3. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by tagno25 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buddy, this is Slashdot; shouldn't that be "with just teh intrawebs"?

      This is Slashdot not 4chan.

    4. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      yeah, that's cool... how do you get the internet? I don't subscribe to cable TV, but I get my internet connection from the cable company, because there isn't any FiOS in my area and DSL is crap, so its either cable or buy a fractional DS3, but why bother when cable internet connection is just as fast, if not faster, and cheaper?

    5. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Stumbles · · Score: 1

      To hell with teh intrawebs.... I want them tubes so I can drive my F250 down them.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    6. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by erroneus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Real life has more commercials than TV. Just saying...

    7. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by JerkBoB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can get cable Internet and not pay for TV. I am, anyhow. True, I pay an extra $10/mo because it's not part of a bundle, but $50/mo vs. $90/mo or $120/mo isn't hard math. I take the money I'm saving and buy shows a-la-carte on the xbox 360 or apple tv. Paying for each show seems weird at first, but when you think about it, at least you're directly supporting the programming you want, and not the 99.9% bullshit that's on cable.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    8. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      A SLA? Guaranties on speed? Ability to resell and have static IPs?

    9. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by lul_wat · · Score: 4, Funny

      I run everywhere. It's just like fast-forwarding.

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    10. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      And if you are lucky and live close enough, you can get DSL for less and have better speeds. I pay for lowest tier of DSL here and I get almost no jitter and faster downloads than any of my friends with 5Megabit Comcast with speedboost. All my VoIP comms are rock solid. They cant keep a VoIp connection live for more than 20 minutes at a time.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      this is the truth and what cable is really scared of, but screw them for not taking care of their Customers. That is that a market economy is really about isn't it.

    12. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And that's not only in the US that happens - it's also happening in Europe.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    13. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by NervousWreck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I pay $15 for DSL but absolutely nothing for TV. It is a law of nature that there is never anything to watch on TV. It is also natural law that people must prove this law by observation a minimum of once a week. Having 15 channels instead of 150 cuts way down on your observation time.

      --
      I do not have a sig. You are hallucinating.
    14. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by eharvill · · Score: 1

      That's great. Too bad for some of us who can only get the Internet via our local cable company...

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    15. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      I don't know, the 15Mbit cable connection I have at home seems to be quite a bit faster than the 10Mbit/sec cavtel fractional ds3 we have at the office, and there are only 3 people at my location, so it's not network saturation that's the problem. It might be all the test equipment that we have in-line though. meh.

    16. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by hubie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Isn't it funny how your comment, which actually is relevant to the story, gets modded "offtopic"?

    17. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

      This. Is. SLASHDOT!!
      *kicks paper-triangle-football into empty KFC bucket*

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    18. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      Seriously? What kind of TV service was available with the internet 10 years ago? I was still on dial-up and stayed there until we got DSL back in 2004 I think.... And even then there wasn't that much available in the way of TV on the internet.

      Thankfully that's changed now though. Hope the cable companies learn how to adapt... and not just by raising internet prices/screwing the customers over in some other way. It's fortunate for them that satellite internet is (and probably always will be) so crappy. Don't think they'll ever match FiOS though. Speaking of which, maybe this will make them get cracking on DOCSIS 3?

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    19. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's true that for many people the cable company is the same as the internet company, but at least you get a better choice of programming, besides not being forced to watch ads.

      Having to pay to watch advertisements is the worst trick the cable companies have done to us, IMHO. And the worst of them all is the AXN channel, where the commercial breaks grow longer and longer during the film. The last time I tried to watch a film on AXN it started at 9 pm. The first break lasted about three minutes. Around 11:30 pm, when the break had lasted for some twenty minutes, I gave up and downloaded the torrent for that film instead.

      These days I seldom watch anything on TV. If I have to pay for all that programming through advertisement I have the right to get it any way I prefer, without having to watch those ads. Since in every product I buy the cost of marketing is in the price I pay and the marketing includes the ads that finance TV I have earned the right to watch those programs without having to pay again to the cable company.

    20. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Also known as turning off the TV and experiencing the truly wonderful show known as "real life".

      I bet the number of us that don't even own a TV would surprise.

      I can't be the only one.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by JerkBoB · · Score: 1

      I'm fortunate in that I live in a sparsely-populated state (Maine) which is still close enough to high-tech states (NH/MA) that I benefit from an 8Mbit downstream with little to no congestion even in the evenings. 'course, 8Mbit is still pretty pathetic to those FiOS bastards. :P

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    22. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by gmurray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem, of course, being that their retaliation will be to cap our bandwidth. They wont sit still. So unless competition forces them to keep the bandwidth uncapped, you wont have enough bits to satisfy your video fix.

    23. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While technically true, cable providers don't make all of their revenue anymore by your standard-vanilla cable connection. They sell you video on demand, extra channels, "HD content" (read: You pay more but since the networks rarely broadcast HD, you don't get much more) and their cable box that lets you record their show (and, strangely, any other box, even the same box bought somewhere else for a fraction of the price, doesn't work, odd...).

      You don't buy any of that if you just "abuse" them for their internet connection. Also, I don't know about your location, but here, if a cable company can offer you internet, you could choose from a few more providers, if nothing else our (formerly fed owned) telco certainly has the pipes to offer you the same, if not better, connectivity. They rarely have the monopoly, usually they're only second after the formerly-fed telco (because they are literally everywhere). And to make matters worse, they're now offering "ADSL-TV", bundling internet, phone and TV at a price most cable providers can't undercut (something that was their strongest selling point for the longest time, they were simply the only to offer these three services bundled, three services most people want to have, and their bundle was heaps cheaper than getting TV from them and phone/internet from the telco).

      Hence I think the biggest "threat" they are feeling now is that telcos start offering TV-by-internet services that undermine their bundle monopoly.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I ignore everything. It's like turning the TV off.

      Pisses off the wife, though.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    25. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Modern TV is like fishing. Of course normal fishing with a rod
      and reel is terribly boring and time consuming so you get
      yourself an automated fishing boat and just see what your trawler
      brings in when it comes back to port.

      I can certainly see why you would think there's nothing on TV if
      you are using an 80s approach to it.

      This is 2010. Let computer technology do the "observing".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My TV is for PS3.

      Aside from games, the PS3 is also for streaming video from the media server.

      The media server does contain some .avi, .mp4, and .m2ts files of shows that may have been broadcast on tv at some point.

      Does that count as watching TV?

    27. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      You must have super phone lines in your area.

      No place I have ever lived has been able to offer DSL connections anything even remotely close to the 20mbps down / 5mbps up -base- connection that comcast gives me.

      The fact that I keep checking should let you know how I feel about comcast however.

    28. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Says the guy posting on the internet to a story about 10 minutes after it went public.

      You're really no better then anyone else, you just use the internet instead of picking TV shows.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    29. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      What else am I supposed to do at the office?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    30. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for letting us know (via the internet) how great your life is without television, internet, and telephone.

    31. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by kaiser423 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have internet and cable. I wanted only internet. I called to cancel cable. I'm now paying $5/month for cable. Guess I'm still a customer, but that $5 is good value for being able to watch some sporting events and the wife's occasional show. They asked me how much cable was worth to me a month, I told them, they charged me that. That made me fairly happy.

    32. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by dexterr · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm fortunate that I live in a sparsely-populated country (Sweden) and I benefit from an 100Mbit downstream with no congestion ever. 'course, 10Mbit upload is still pretty pathetic.

    33. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by human+spam+filter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. It's funny, a guy from comcast came by last week to see if we want to get any of their services.. I told him that we have DSL and we don't need cable. Then he asked if we get everything through DSL (TV, phone, internet), so I said yes, which is true as we use skype and mostly watch Hulu, Netflix, and movies from Amazon. He wanted to know how much we pay and I told him $35 per month.. then he just said good bye and left.

    34. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by JerkBoB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Twist the knife a bit more, will ya? :P

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    35. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Phones: Vonage
      Internet: FiOS
      TV: DirecTV

      DirecTV's service has been phenomenal. Vonage is rock solid. FiOS is awesome, except when they add a new customer on in my neighborhood, I have a brief outage (long enough for me to reboot the modem) whenever I see their truck. The POP for my neighborhood is next to my house, so I see the truck out there, I know I need to reboot. It isn't a big deal at all, I am not one that expects 5 9s SLA for home internet access. That said, I'm getting somewhere around 98% uptime, and that's pretty fantastic overall. I believe FiOS has pretty much got the entire area wired up now, so the outages have become much more sporadic, occurring very rarely now.

      Total monthly bills for each of these services is around $150. I pay more for the NFL Sunday Ticket right prior to football season starting up, so that's why the bill is higher overall. I've been a DirecTV customer for about 10 years now, and I've gotta tell you, you simply cannot beat their customer service, their programming, and their signal almost never ever goes out. (It's gone out once since I moved to NoVA, and that was during a ridiculously bad storm. (The rain was coming down so hard it was blocking the signal. Of course, since I have a DVR, it wasn't an issue at all.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    36. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by eharvill · · Score: 1

      (The rain was coming down so hard it was blocking the signal. Of course, since I have a DVR, it wasn't an issue at all.

      Unless you are trying to record at show at that time. Seems to happen to me a lot unfortunately...

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    37. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went the other way. I paid Verizon for 15 years for phone service what I thought was to much money and it would require a huge discount or service change for me to consider ever paying them another dime as long as I live. Aside from the long distance hoops they made you jump through, my two biggest issues were paying $3/month for tone dialing service and another $2.50/month to have my number unpublished and unlisted. Yes, I had to pay a monthly fee to have that unservice. I wrote letters and went to the local county meetings when the franchise agreements were discussed and I never even got a real explanation of what the unpublished/unlisted charge was for and was handed the run around. What it really amounted to was the fee was small enough that not a lot of people complained and Verizon knew they could get away with it. Oddly, I had to pay the monthly fee to be unlisted/unpublished for my home phone but had to pay an even higher monthly fee to have my business number listed/published. It was a complete scam to support their side business publishing phone books and selling your number information that was a completely separate issue not related to the local franchise agreements. I did not have a choice back then but the second I did I left.

      I guess the bottom line is if you have an exclusive agreement for a local area (franchise monopoly) and you screw the people over long enough, a lot will leave when given ANY alternative. Comcast is having that problem now but I'm sure Verizon had the same problem 10 years ago when local phone options like VOIP and cheaper cell plans came around and cable companies offered internet as an alternative to Verizon DSL/ISDN.

    38. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with this where I live is that AT&T is the only DSL provider. I'll take Comcast customer service over AT&T's any day! My last attempt to get AT&T to install DSL service they didn't show up on the 1st appointment, didn't show up on the 2nd appointment but claimed they hooked everything up (they didn't), and didn't show up on the 3rd appointment. Never called, never rang my doorbell, and I kept a constant watch for a service vehicle. After 4 weeks of trying to get them to come out I gave up and stuck with Comcast. This doesn't even begin to go into the mess that is their phone system. Every single phone call I was transferred between no less than 3 people. With Comcast I have never been transferred more than once and that was only to the local office.

      I did cancel my TV service though and kept only the Internet service. On the upside, they didn't put a filter on my line so I am still getting Basic cable for free. Of course, OTA is impossible to tune in without an outdoor antenna which the apartment complex won't permit.

    39. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

      "This is Slashdot not 4chan."

      There but for the grace of mods go we.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    40. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by flappinbooger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "the truly wonderful show known as "real life""

      mmmm..... nope. No. Just internet, with video on demand. Hulu. Netflix. All the other free-stream-online-until-they-get-shut-down sites.

      It's the new normal. Broadcast is dead. It started dying with tivo and the dvr, and dropped dead and stinky with ubiquitous broadband and solid, simple and reliable VOD services.

      I've had no landline phone since 2003 and I haven't watched broadcast TV for ... at least a few years. Can't stand it. Even hulu is getting on my nerves with their increased commercials. I only know roughly when shows air because of when the latest ep gets added to the online services. VOD is to network tv like MP3 is to the RIAA and divx is to the MPAA.

      Is hulu big enough yet to have original content? FOX NBC CBS and ABC will have to truly embrace the streaming stuff, and I think they have to a certain extent, so perhaps they won't go the way of the newspaper!

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    41. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get 200 channels. At 7:55PM you need to figure out what to watch at 8:00 PM. You start going thru the channel guide at 5 seconds per channel. After 1000 seconds you make your decision. But ... the show is already a quarter over. Now actually you figure this is going to happen at 7:55, you know that there probably isn't a decent show on anyway, and you pick up your book and continue reading. TV has become a mindless bog or junk. News shows have so much time they have to event some news and tell some lies to invent more news. Reality shows - duh, sit in the mall and watch the morons walk by! I can't stand TV!

    42. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K. They also often have a better ping than you do due to actually spending money on infrastructure rather than CEO yachts.

    43. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

      I think you're confused as to who provides you with internet.

    44. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by pehrs · · Score: 1

      Due to the crushing tax pressure of socialism it costs about $6 a month.

    45. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot not 4chan.

      Give it a year.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    46. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our verizon overlords.

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    47. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Real life has more commercials than TV.

      I have mod points to burn at the moment, but I will just say this: your post is not funny. It is insightful, underrated, interesting and even informative (if the reader is living in a barrel), but it is not fucking funny.

    48. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was cheaper for me to get their basic cable plan with my internet connection than to get the internet connection alone. I didn't even own a TV at the time. I've since bought one so I can watch movies (streamed from netflix, or over wifi from the media drive on my computer). The funny thing when originally setting it up was that the Comcast customer service people keep trying to upsell me on channel packages. You would think "I do not own a television" would convince them they were wasting time trying to get me to pay another $75 a month. It's like they aren't even human anymore, they're just corporate appendages emulating human interaction. If you replaced them with a form it would be just as impersonal, and easier to close the annoying popup windows.

      Unfortunately, Comcast has a monopoly around here so I have no choice but to give them their money. The second anyone else can offer a decent connection to me I'm paying. Even if it's a little more expensive, unless their customer service is just as Comcastic, I'm jumping ship.

    49. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by soliptic · · Score: 1

      when the break had lasted for some twenty minutes

      WTF!? Please tell me this is exaggeration. I cannot fathom the idea of a TWENTY MINUTE ad break in a film. I've practically given up on TV because the 4-5 minutes we get here are too annoying for me. Do people really tolerate 20 minutes? Rather makes me fear for the future of the human race, if so.

    50. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I'm fortunate that I live in a sparsely-populated country (Sweden) and I benefit from an 100Mbit downstream with no congestion ever.

      Sparsely-populated countries (or regions in my case) are open to variations of definition. I currently live in Perth (Western Australia) but am moving to a comparatively remote area of Tasmania in December. I have enjoyed a reasonable ADSL2+ connection here that is ample for my needs, but nothing is going to give me a 100 Mb/s connection in Tas, given that I can't afford to run cable to the nearest Telstra connection 2 km away. I have had bad experiences with satellite connections in regional West Aus, but I'm hoping the next level up will be workable there. Mountains aren't good for normal wireless...

    51. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by shovas · · Score: 1

      Well, really he meant 4 years ago which, we might as well say, is five years and, as well all know, five is pretty much ten when rounded up.

      --
      Selah.ca. Pause, and calmly think on that.
    52. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *sigh* if only I had an imaginary wife....

    53. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too. Although it took me several days to figure out that I could do that. I was already level 6 and starting to push towards Crossroads.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    54. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      Is hulu big enough yet to have original content?

      Actually, yes they do. If I Can Dream just came out this Spring, though it doesn't do much for me, as it's just another reality TV show. If they had something original, along the lines of Lost, Fringe, Eureka, Chuck, etc, it might be worth tuning in. But watching a bunch of wanna-be stars' every waking moments is nothing more than voyeurism, and not very entertaining, IMHO. Of course, the TV industry probably doesn't understand why a site called slashdot and bills itself as, "News for Nerds. Stuff That Matters" could ever get more than 10 hits a day, either,. . .

    55. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by highspl · · Score: 1

      It's called replacing cable, satellite and everything else with just the cable internet.

      --
      It puts the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again.
    56. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but this is HD-TV, it has more resolution than real life! /obligatory_futurama_quote

    57. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot not 4chan.

      Oh, I thought this was SPARTAAAAA!!!!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    58. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of things... Facebook, Twitter, Friendster, StackOverflow...

    59. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by harl · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that the only people who will sell me anything larger than 1 Mb pipe is . . . the cable company!

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    60. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by harl · · Score: 1

      Apparently you live in the opposite land of me. The DSL here is shit and my cable connection has gone down once in the last 6 years.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    61. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      He may mean something like U-verse. It's fiber to a box at the bottom of the street, and ADSL from there to several hundred houses. Our total package peaks at >18Mbps, most of which is for the TV service.

    62. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    63. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Is hulu big enough yet to have original content? FOX NBC CBS and ABC will have to truly embrace the streaming stuff, and I think they have to a certain extent, so perhaps they won't go the way of the newspaper!

      You do know Hulu is jointly owned by Fox, NBC, and ABC right? It's their way of making sure Web content is bottlenecked the same way as cable TV. They're even moving to a pay model, offering only subscription service to iPhone users and starting to put portions of the content behind a paywall. ABC has started pulling out though, so maybe it will fail. A better way to test original content on the Web are the YouTube and Netflix original content.

    64. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by dolo724 · · Score: 1

      It can be boring at times, but the episodes are worth waiting for.

      ftfy.

      --
      But you just gotta have another sigarette
    65. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      *sigh* if only my wife were imaginary...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    66. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What real life? Do you mean the Internet? I use AdBlock plus.

      Just kidding. My RL ad blocker is called: looking somewhere else! (Breasts are a good recommendation! :D)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    67. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      Is hulu big enough yet to have original content? FOX NBC CBS and ABC will have to truly embrace the streaming stuff, and I think they have to a certain extent, so perhaps they won't go the way of the newspaper!

      Hulu is a joint venture between NBC, FOX, and ABC. It exists to stream content generated by the broadcast networks who created it. Don't expect any original content there; it's not an independent provider.

    68. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      You actually bring up a good point. If all advertisements involved hot topless women I would remove AdBlock Plus and come crawling back to Cable with my hands outstretched.

    69. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      What else am I supposed to do at the office?

      Well you could masturbate... just don't make eye contact with other people... it gets wierd.

    70. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crappy thing is that the choices for satellite are only twofold, one of which is DirecTV a company owned by Rupert Murdoch. On the cable front the options are also limited, one of which is Comcast. Pretty crappy choices but fortunately there are others available.

    71. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      See my Sig for why I think cable sucks. The switch from analog-to-digital drove up my cost to $82.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    72. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Shut up.

      I went without TV for a number of years, and you know what? it wasn't worth it.

      People like you have created some sort of false dichotomy where people either ONLY watch TV or ONLY go outside. It's a stupid thought with current technology.

      I got news for you pal, that ain't so.

      I'm go to cut of the other argument:
      It's just a media type. IT isn't good or bad. It just depends on what you are watching. Just like a book is not good or bad, it depends on what you are reading.

      Then there is the social hit. This what brought to my attention when my son couldn't participate in a conversation about shark week. At that moment I realized that I was STUPID not to let me family watch TV.. It's the content stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    73. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes. 'TV' is just a screen you watch content on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    74. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by cffrost · · Score: 1

      "Funny" is for when a moderator appreciates the quality of a post, but chooses to deny karma for the author.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    75. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I jack off. It's like owning a porn store featuring your favorite gay porn star.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    76. Re:I already had my revenge 10 years ago. by haruchai · · Score: 1

      On Slashdot, you're supposed to have imaginary girlfriends. Your real-life wife is your own doing
      and your own problem.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  2. Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the phone company is known for their warm, friendly, helpful customer service. Can't speak for satellite, but my years with DSL with SBC yielded only marginal support at best.

    1. Re:Right by PhongUK · · Score: 2

      Not sure why this is marked as flamebait, he's drawing a relevant comparison between the services mentioned in TFA.

    2. Re:Right by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Honestly, I use DSL (the phone company) because their service is reliable, even though their support is TERRIBLE. If the service you provide is reliable, you can get away with terrible customer support (because customers rarely need to use it). IF however, you are a cable company with terrible service then you NEED good customer support, because they will be calling you often. My local cable company (Charter) has great support, but terrible internet. My local DSL (AT&T) has terrible support, but reliable internet.

    3. Re:Right by Heather+D · · Score: 1

      True that. Our local DSL provider is CenturyLink which is just the old Verizon crap after a couple of name changes. Verizon was famous locally for delivering service that failed from 3 pm to 1 am and always when it rained. They recently got a friend to change their service and we ended up having to go through a mess to get them to drop their charges when it failed to work.

      In this area cable beats them easily not just in speed but service and reliability. I really don't know how they stay in business unless its just by taking advantage of the 'Internet is always flaky' crowd. Apparently they decided that the old name change and run an ad campaign routine is more profitable than fixing the network. That's why we left them years ago.

    4. Re:Right by danlip · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Qwest is far worse than Comcast, and those are my only choices. After giving me the "8 am to 5 pm" time frame for install (i.e. please take the entire day off work and wait for us), the Qwest tech failed to show up in that time frame, with no phone call. Qwest also has far more hidden charges than Comcast (i.e. you pay way more than the advertised price). And their "line backer" service, which is extra and is supposed to cover the internal lines in your house, does not actually cover anything. I hate Comcast, but I hate Qwest more.

    5. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't tried calling or dealing with your cable company.

      Last December, it took 3 tech visits to "fix" a problem. Actually, they didn't fix it, but it requires 2 tech visits to get it moved up the support tier, and one of the techs apparently never reported in to the system, so they had to send another out; actually, he probably reported it, but the system didn't record it or dropped it or something. 1 month later, with fuzzy tv, no internet, they finally do a truck roll. They upgraded the lines and was pumping too much signal in, which was degrading the cable modem sporadically and created fuzzy tv.

      I asked for money back on my bill. They said they would. Never applied it. Then, despite me paying the bill anyways, put me on a blacklist to take my services away (see towards end of post).

      In my area, they recently forced people to upgrade to DTAs. They did this horribly. Some people like me never got notified until 4 days before they were supposedly turning channels off. Because of this, there was a mass rush to the local Comcast branch. Which ran out of DTAs. For 2 days. btw, the past several months, they've been deliberately screwing packets to drop torrents, and slowing longer downloads. Internet service has degraded.

      2 weeks ago, they sent a UPS package to my house. I live on a busy street; I don' t have packages shipped to me. They sent me 2 more DTAs. So I have 4 DTAs, I had to drive back to the Comcast office (half hour each way) to return one of them (only 3 are free). There goes 1 hour and a gallon of gas.

      Meanwhile, my parents, who got notified early, received that automated call last week saying they had to upgrade. They had, 1 1/2 months prior, when they made a tech visit their house (had to, in order to install a cable card in one of the TVs they have; Comcast won't allow the user to do this).

      That problem with Comcast saying I didn't pay my bill. Got an automated call, no person, saying service would be cut off. Called back, found out the automated call was a pre-collections agency, who had my info, but no other access to Comcast to find out the details of why.

      So I call Comcast. Get their automated payment *by default*, which they charge you for (phone payments are charged something like $2.95 or something). Remember, my bill is paid. I get out of that into their menu setup, and the phone menu system say it's $4.95 *to speak* to a billing reprsentative.

      Now, I know the $4.95 charge is to speak to and process your payment through the billing rep, but the menu system clearly said $4.95 *to speak* to the billing rep only. I say screw it, and go online and got the problem fixed via their online help, which supposedly fixed the problem.

      I had DSL and a landline prior to the cable modem. I thought the phone company was bad. In comparison, the phone company was freaking great.

      4G hit my area this month. I've seriously considered switching. I put an Ask Slashdot question on how to get fractional DS3 or a DS3, but it wasn't accepted. In my area, there are plenty of internet providers, just no one appears to run a line for a reasonable cost.

      btw, you can email Rick, the VP on the support/feedback form, but all they do is have a local call you back to blow smoke up your ass. VP's staff so overloaded and there is so much crap in the way that stuff doesn't get fixed anyways despite clear efforts to get it done. Security fixes don't get fixed, they get redirected, and then that department drops the ball. Local branches call you, but then sit on their hands. Everything is handed off, and worse, the headend guys, who are responsible for coordinating truck rolls and keeping clear feeds, are just complete bastards who I imagine let out a big sigh because they have to do their job, which they do reluctantly once in a while to keep up appearances of how necessary they are.

      All this shit about them taking people seriously recently--you're only PRETENDING TO CARE, when you should have been treating the customer well the entire time. You didn't, and we see through your crappy advertising claims and false efforts now.

    6. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused. Doesn't private industry offer better customer service than government agencies? I mean, I go to the Post Office or the DMV and I get rude people who don't really give a crap about my situation. Are you telling me that's what I get from the private sector too? GASP!!!

      I'm sure there's some tenuous theory that will allow the Laissez-Faire type to soothe their conflicted mind over this issue, like saying that if there were more competition customer service would be better. However, there is plenty of competition in the airline industry and they still treat their customer like crap.

    7. Re:Right by NetNed · · Score: 1

      Add to that SBC saying "Yes, just pay us 80 to 150 dollars and we can get a new modem/wireless router combo out to you" when yours fries out, which is like every 2 to 3 years

      If my cable modem goes down, they come out and replace it free of charge.

    8. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One ringy-dingy...two ringy-dingy...

    9. Re:Right by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      When I used to have SBC DSL, my DSL modem died and they told me I could buy one from them, or go get my own. I was a bit surprised when after checking pricing, they sold the model I chose for about 30% less than everyone else online.

      But it was as you say, original died after 2 years of use. They give you the cheapest piece of crap they can lay their hands on up front to get you on their service.

    10. Re:Right by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      Yea my cable company, Shaw called me 4 times to ask if I liked their service after switching to them. They are super polite and fast for service. In Canada here so I dunno if that makes a difference. Our local TV/ Phone company MTS on the other hand is a horrid fucking joke of rude asshats. Didn't take me long to learn to hate them. And boy I wanted a change! They offered TV for the first time and they are shit. I think It's because they were a state/province owned utility gone private. All the lackluster service of a government minded " I have my job forever and we don't care about service" business, mixed with the profit minded cable/internet company mindset! Yuck the worst of both worlds!

    11. Re:Right by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Seriously.

      Although having reviewed several options around here between myself, friends and coworkers, the phone company is actually the second best option...

      * The cable company I have is by far the most reliable and the best service. It's also the second most %$#@ing expensive at the high end
      * The phone company has the second worst service, but the second best reliability, and an intermediate price
      * The satellites are the cheapest, but you don't get internet (so, if you want internet, you'll probably be paying more since there's no bundle), tied for the worst reliability, and decent customer service
      * The last cable company (the most popular, probably due to it's advertising and the fact that it was the first in the area) has the highest prices, worst service and reliability on par with satellites.

      Conversely, where my aunt lives, there's a monopoly in the cable area, and you pretty much need to go with the phone company if you want anything decent (satellite is less reliable there, but much better service/price).

      I've yet to see a home-based or single-store based (i.e. HH Gregg, BW3s) satellite that wasn't affected fairly decently by weather still. Not had that issue with most cable companies (guessing they have better grade satellites for their video streams, or multiple locations with fallback/failover). But, if I were living in most of the southwest, I would probably go for satellite.

      I guess given that long ramble, it really varies on your area as to which is best. There are areas where the cable company at the bottom of my list is actually really good (just not around here), and likewise, there are areas where the cable company I use is run poorly. The local infrastructure is just as important as the higher level infrastructure in many cases.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  3. Nothing new by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Time Warner, at least here in north central NC, has been making a concerted effort for the last several years, and actually has pretty darn good service. Their broadband is almost never down. They almost always show up when they say they will, you can get someone on the phone typically within 5 minutes, and the people on their phone support seem to actually know what they are talking about. Yes, they are still too expensive, but service hasn't really been an issue for me. We are moving our business phones and internet access to their business class service as it will save us around $30k a year, so we will see how that works out, but other than price for home service, I'm pretty happy with them.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:Nothing new by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Do you also have a Mini office deal in your local Mall?? (Hanes Mall does)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Nothing new by Miros · · Score: 1

      I know of a campus that went from a leased line to TWc for internet. Unfortunately, the cablemodem+router provided was a POS that couldn't handle reasonable PPS rates for the application meaning that they never were able to take full advantage of the bandwidth provided by the service. It was the only cablemodem+router that TWc would provide/support/allow. Now, I think they are switching to a metro-ethernet provider.

    3. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice, but that's not what we're talking about at all. We're talking about cable television, not cable internet. Yes, they're both carried over the same wire, and yes, both divisions are run by the same parent company. However, the support people are often two completely different divisions/departments, and one of them has done an excellent job giving a bad name to themselves. Those are the ones we're talking about here.

    4. Re:Nothing new by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      When I last worked for Time Warner in Austin, TX, (between 2003 and 2006) our tech support motto was "One and Done". Basically, the idea was to help a customer with their technical issue and try and get it resolved the first and last time over the phone. This was done for two reasons. 1. It makes the customer happy not to have to call back. 2. By them not calling back, they tie up fewer TSR and CSR resources in the long term.

      Unfortunately, it was often the on-site technicians or dispatch that fucked everything up. I would say half of my incoming calls were directly tied back to a botched scheduling or that a technician (contractor too) left an on-site job half-assed completed.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Nothing new by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I live in Lexington, we don't have a mall, we have "Uptown", complete with "Pigs In The City" as you know. When we want to go to a real mall, we either go to Hanes or Four Seasons (I work N of GSO), or perhaps Concord Mills where they have a Bass Pro shop. ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:Nothing new by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Guess what? I have both and have for over 15 years in this area. Generally speaking, if one goes out, the other does as well. And their support for both is handled by the same office.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:Nothing new by Sandbags · · Score: 4, Informative

      Really? TWC in SC has essentially given up in the last 2 years. No new hardware, virtually no new services, they stopped even trying to price match sattelite service, they're the most expensive ISP and internet phone period around here, most of their field techs are essentially outsourced lowest bidder crackpots who can't install anything properly or cleanly and never get the job specs and special notes clarified on their work orders, and tech support over the phone simply sucks. If they can convince you that bringing your hardware to them is what's required (even though they have in home service) they will, there's rampant mis-billing issues and problems with packages and discounts, spotty Internet bandwidth and heavy packet loss issues, and just general misinformation.

      I got pretty good service from TWC during a period from 2000 - 2006. After that prices went up, discounts went away, equipment became spotty, internet prices went up without improvements in service, and eventually my complaints fell on deaf ears. Finally someone told me quite litterally "if you can get better service from Dish and AT&T at a lower price, you should switch. We no longer price match our competitors offers" so i left. I get much faster internet from AT&T for $5 less per month, got $350 for switching, combined my mobile bill and added generic home phone (with no options for only $11/month) and now get calls to all AT&T subscribers (not just mobiles) without using minutes. I swtched to Dish and instead of having 1 DVR and 2 boxes I now have DVR in 4 rooms (2 in HD), the ability to watch a recorded show in another room, more channels, and i pay $30 less per month. The only time i see image break-up is during REALLY heavy storms, and I'd still call it generally watchable with the exception of 2 local stations who's upstream satellites have issues (which also cut out on TWC btw). I simply switch over to a traditional HD antenna when its bad, but I've only done that 2 times in a year, and I only do that when something I'm trying to record is not also available on netfix, hulu, or another website.

      I initially had some billing issues with Dish due to some discounts not applying properly, but they not only fixed it, they gave me a month's service free. i also had 2 installation issues they had to come back to resolve, and i got additional free time added without complaint (one case, the didn't have a ladder big enough to get to my 3rd floor, the other was a failed dish installation, a bad cable). They were on time within 20 minutes of schedule all 4 time's I've seen an engineer. TWC has shown up 4-5 hours late on more than 1 occasion, and all i can get out of them is 1 week of basic cable (not my entire bill, a whopping $9 and some change) free when that happens, and it takes an hour long phone call to do even that...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    8. Re:Nothing new by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this sentiment in my area. I feel very lucky that the local cable monopoly does have knowledgeable support (for the most part, esp on the Cable Internet side of things). Prices are still too expensive... enough so that I am thinking of dropping the catv option and only going with their Internet service. Since the wife needs TV, my choice will be Dish or something like it.

    9. Re:Nothing new by mitgib · · Score: 1

      We have an OC3 from TimeWarner and the service has always been great, but on the pricey side when buying higher speed links. We are replacing them with Cogent this month and doubling our bandwidth while saving a little each month. There are a number of vendors to choose from for phone service, so bundling just doesn't look good when you get to this level of service, but for the home user might be a great option. We are just over the border from Charlotte, in South Carolina.

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
    10. Re:Nothing new by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      We now run all critical server functions on remote servers except intranet/file serving, and have only 12 phone lines, so their unlimited phones for $35 ea. mo. and two 5/1.5 for less than $200 each is a good deal for us, replacing pots and two T1s and saving us the 30k yearly. Our local service is AT&T, and we have downtime all the time, and absolute shit service from them. Used to be BellSouth before AT&T bought them out, and back then, the service was great.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    11. Re:Nothing new by peragrin · · Score: 1

      We have time warner business call at 7 locations across upstate NY.

      On average time warner is dropping 1-2 locations every month. now overall their service isn't bad in any one given location, but overall it is about 95% uptime.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    12. Re:Nothing new by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Time Warner, at least here in north central NC, has been making a concerted effort for the last several years, and actually has pretty darn good service. Their broadband is almost never down. They almost always show up when they say they will, you can get someone on the phone typically within 5 minutes, and the people on their phone support seem to actually know what they are talking about.

      Exactly the same experience with Time Warner here in Southern California.

      I fought with Verizon for over a month, trying to get DSL working... No good. Have to call them between 9am and 4pm to get an ISP representative, rather than auto-transfer to some billing moron who will talk to you for 15 minutes, before mentioning you've got the wrong department, they can't possibly help you, and you need to hang up and dial the exact same number you called to get the first idiot. And god help you if you do get through to a rep after a half hour, because they hardly understand what a phone line is, and try desperately to get you to hang-up with some nonsense, without helping in any way. The number of times I've heard "it'll be fixed tomorrow" is astounding. Even after insisting on getting a tech to come out a couple time, nobody ever showed. No calls, no note, nothing.

      Meanwhile, about 5 minute hold time with Time Warner, a rep that offered the best deal they had up-front, and had two installers come out the next damn day. Normally 33% more expensive than Verizon DSL, but also 50% faster, and unlike Verizon, I've had all of 1 hour of downtime in the past year+.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:Nothing new by luther349 · · Score: 0

      agreed i switched to dish and there support it awesome i also get dsl threw windstream. im saving over 50$ a month compared when i had cable and my phone threw other providers without internet. the dish never goes out unless its really storming outside where talking tornado warned cells but at that time i have my weather radio on anyways. and the cable would go out in the same systems anyways but for much longer. it went out one time in a heavy ice storm once but was back up whiten a hr. when i called them in the ice storm being it was the first heavy snow that ever knocked out the dish they where willing to send a tech the same morning to see if it was iced over. try getting that kind of support from cable. its the same story with my dsl provider the tech support is amarcan not some guy in India. if i need support im on the line with a real person normally instantly.

  4. Day late and dollar short... by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife and I just purchased a Bluray player that does Netflix, Amazon, and several other on-demand video services. I also installed an HDTV in the attic and ran the signal down to both of our HDTVs. We still have to pay Verizon for internet access, but we no longer have a $100+ video bill every month.

    1. Re:Day late and dollar short... by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... HDTV *antenna* in the attic ...

    2. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife and you, have your own HDTV's? I hope you at least share a bed!

    3. Re:Day late and dollar short... by squinty_s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately for the sports lovers out there, you still kinda have to have some TV service. You can always pirate the games afterwards, however what's the joy of watching a game after its already ended? At that point you may as well just watch one of those couple of minute summaries they have. Also, no everyone can get more than a channel or two with even a roof antenna since the digital conversion.

    4. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's where the HDTV antenna in the attic comes in. Most live-or-die games are available on broadcast TV, such as the Super Bowl. For everything else, there's either your friend's place or the sports bar.

    5. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Great, but loosing the sports channels, kids channels, national news feeds, and the food network is simply not an option. I looked into it, but after covering the cost of the antenna, cabling, netFlix, and an upgraded internet connection to handle more than 1 concurrent video stream, and throwing in $15 a month to subscribe to TV shows only available for a fee (legally), the difference in price was basically a wash, and that didn't include the storage drives and backups I'd need to handle offline TV viewing and DVRing of TV shows, and the computer equipment for recording. A lot of hassle and the wife simply couldn't pick up a remote and watch TV. Too much hassle for virtually no savings. We pay $54 a month for Dish including 2 HD rooms and 2 SD rooms, all 4 on DVR... what the hell service did you have that was over $130 a month? (assuming $100 bill going away included the cost of your replacement subscriptions)

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    6. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      1 night at a sports bar is the same cost as a monthly cable bill to get the sports channels... too many nights at a sports bar while the wife is home with the kids and it costs half what you own and the kids too (divorce).

      and no, in SC, very few games are on local TV, more than half the Olympics were on cable or dish exclusive channels, the super bowl is supposed to be on ESPN this year, and that's just sports.... Nickelodeon and other similar channels, national news, food network, there's a LOT you loose going "free" (which is far from free if you still intend to have a DVR).

      If we could do without, we would. I went nearly 2 years without even having a TV hooked up. I got a lot of books read, and a lot of games played. However, with kids, and with family that come to visit, plus trying to entertain other company, certain levels of TV are simply expected to be available, and local only doesn't cut it, unless you can claim poverty. I make more than my dad and grandpa combined, and when they come for Sunday meals, the availability of the golf channel is simply assumed.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    7. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well talk to Comcast. I cancelled my subscription because the only HD channels they were adding were sports channels. Realizing that after I removed the sports channels and the local HD channels from my HD package, I was paying extra for 3 channels. How anyone can watch that much sports is beyond me.

    8. Re:Day late and dollar short... by damonlab · · Score: 1

      You can buy a lot of tickets to go watch the games in person with the money you will save by cutting the cable for a year.

    9. Re:Day late and dollar short... by initdeep · · Score: 1

      a lot of people say the same thing about reality shows, drama's (how much csi can you really watch), etc.

      Just because you don't like sports that much doesn't mean other people don't.

    10. Re:Day late and dollar short... by initdeep · · Score: 2, Informative

      really?

      try doing the math sometime.

      you'd be surprised.

      don't forget to add fuel at $3.00/gallon.

      a simple exercise would be baseball.
      4 games a month (i per weekend basically)
      $15.00 per ticket for the cheapest possible seat x1
      that's $60.00 month.

      now throw in a few extra shekels for getting there and back, say $5.00 per visit and you're at $80.00/month.

      and baseball is one of the cheapest sports to attend.

      try going to an NFL game for less than $50 each trip.

    11. Re:Day late and dollar short... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      Or you can go to a bar and watch the game there, with people....

    12. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, no everyone can get more than a channel or two with even a roof antenna since the digital conversion.

      I get 27 different channels in 27502, and my antenna isn't even outside. I don't know what you're doing wrong.

    13. Re:Day late and dollar short... by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      Nope man...this is just the start to a reboot of "Flowers in the Attic"...

    14. Re:Day late and dollar short... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      "what the hell service did you have that was over $130 a month?"

      Verizon ExtremeHD (58) + Movie Pack (26) + 2 DVRs (32) + 3 "Dumb" (12) Converters = Total of $128

      Taxes push it over $130.

      The Bluray player was $159 at costco, and a Netflix subscription is under $15. I designed and built my own antenna, so that was just the cost of copper and brass tubing (it's a 12dBi Log-Periodic Dipole Array that lives in my attic).

      Please note that I am not claiming to have the same variety and availability of programming now that we did when we had the expensive service. Your change would have been a wash because it is obvious you were trying not to lose functionality or programming.

      Apples and Oranges

    15. Re:Day late and dollar short... by squinty_s · · Score: 1

      Personally I could couldn't care less about sports, but I know quite a few people that enjoy it in the privacy of their home, away from the noise of a bar. Besides, not all of us live in major towns and cities where there are bars everywhere.

    16. Re:Day late and dollar short... by squinty_s · · Score: 1

      You can also get a roku device. It does Netflix, Amazon, and a few others. It has a bunch of free channels as well. It only costs about $100 and can use a wireless connection. I bought one for my parents and they love it.

    17. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there are 10 times more baseball games than football games in a year per team. With those numbers you could say baseball is the one that's overpriced.

    18. Re:Day late and dollar short... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      the DVR alone is the only thing i really care for, as it;s the enabler for me to pretty much be able to watch content at all. If all programs were available online with at least a 4 week back catalog of current episodes, published within a day of airing, even for a fee i could accept that, but WAY too much is simply not available that way, and without a DVR, i would not be able to see anything else.

      I see your point. I also see that I pay $79 a month today through Dish network (1 less dumb receiver though, but that's only $4.95 more) for what you were paying $130 for... (and my discounts already expired, i was only paying $52). I get 200 base channels in HD, 2 HD DVRs with multiroom function in SD to 2 additional rooms, and in-home service.

      My real issues basically beyond the DVR, is the core channels we watch outside of recorded programming were all either life streams not available online, or channels that were behind their own pay-walls or required series subscriptions in iTunes.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    19. Re:Day late and dollar short... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      is parking free?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    20. Re:Day late and dollar short... by squinty_s · · Score: 1

      punch in 12428 here: http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/ and let me know if you get any channels... If you do, then the universal alignment is 2.5 years early and you fell into another dimension..

    21. Re:Day late and dollar short... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      F the major leagues.

      Go watch Farm or college. It's a lot less of the spoiled brat attitude and more of the 'I'm damn luck I get to play a game for a living' attitude.

      Plus there are fewer jackass fans.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. In My City by Codename+Dutchess · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know where I live, Charter has a monopoly on cable. There isn't much you can do about it; They've got the fastest internet. They charge you 50 dollars cash on the spot to hook up a modem and provision it for you. Hard stuff. The service techs they send to your house are dumb as hell too. They couldn't figure out the crappy interface that their newfangled modem / wifi router had installed on it. I laughed quite a bit after they couldn't figure out how to enable WPA2. Although, in their defense, the admin panel was designed by someone who didn't know what they were doing. So, basically, there is a lot they can improve on.

    1. Re:In My City by Moryath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Very similar issues with Comcrap.

      First, when they came out to do my install, I was getting a crappy-as-hell signal. Their techs sat around scratching their asses for three hours, and eventually (only after I'd been on the phone with a supervisor behind their backs) finally went out to check the routing equipment, only to find that some ass-tard had simply shoved shit together any which way out there and had broken the lead on the connection going to my house. Elapsed time before they got that fixed: 7 days later.

      Then they started rolling every goddamn thing into the "digital only" package. "Doesn't cost any more" except that you have to rent a specialized fucking receiver for each goddamn room you want it in, or if you want to actually use the CableCard function built into your TV, they actually charge you MORE to rent the fucking cablecard.

      Then we get to the network crap.

      I had three machines; one recently rebuilt, one laptop, one old machine I use for video-to-TV playback.

      Video-to-TV box and laptop are configured to OpenDNS. They worked the moment I wired in. Upstairs box, newly rebuilt, started getting Comcrap's "we hijack your traffic" crap-DNS info, kept trying to make me go through a fuck-ton of meaningless registration crap and "please sign up for a comcast.net email" (don't need or want yet another fucking email address) before crashing both IE and Firefox (supposedly they were "in the middle of updating it" for multiple days).

      Took me 3 phone calls. On the third call, after calling bullshit on their "well they must be working on it" lie, it then took 4 hours and 2 levels of jumping up and down screaming "just give me your supervisor or someone who goddamn knows what they are doing" to get the goddamn thing cleared. Went through afterwards, said "fuck you" to their DNS servers, and set both the final box and my router itself to use OpenDNS instead.

      Every time I have a service issue, I wind up calling them, and some retard in "customer service" insists "well the tool says your cable modem is fine" (bullshit, both cable TV and internet service are down completely, and yes I already went through your ENTIRE TROUBLESHOOTING METHOD you fucking dingbat, it happens frequently enough that I have the goddamn process memorized after all). Then I insist they pass me to a supervisor, who half the time is a complete ass who's mad I took him away from playing his fucking facebook games, and the other half the time admits that yeah, there is either a "scheduled maintenance outage" (which they never inform us of AHEAD of time) or a problem at the local routing station... which they are too fucking lazy to inform the level-1's about.

      The only reason I'm on comcrap at all is that my alternatives in the area are crap. AT&T DSL in my area gets maybe 0.5 Mbit down, if that. Verizon FiOS is a mile away but keeps saying that because they don't "own the lines" in my subdivision, they aren't allowed to offer service. Functionally, Comcrap is a goddamn monopoly, and it shows.

    2. Re:In My City by TheKidWho · · Score: 0, Troll

      They charge you 50 dollars cash on the spot to hook up a modem and provision it for you. Hard stuff.

      Of course, that's why they're doing it and you're paying them.

      Or else you know, you'd set up your own backbone to the internet and all.

      Oh, you mean they should do things for free for you? Because you're such a nice guy?

    3. Re:In My City by Hatta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Video-to-TV box and laptop are configured to OpenDNS. They worked the moment I wired in. Upstairs box, newly rebuilt, started getting Comcrap's "we hijack your traffic" crap-DNS info

      You know OpenDNS redirects NXDOMAIN too.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:In My City by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Sure, but they allow you to turn it off if you want.

    5. Re:In My City by urieleoc · · Score: 1

      Charter is so far the only game in my town I can get service with as well. I live at the end of a very long cable run and Charter can't give me anything close to decent internet service. Over about 8 service visits and dozens of calls, I got put on a 'needy customer' list where everything is deemed to be my fault first and will only dispatch people to look at the wiring in my house where there is no problem. I logged about a month's worth of cable modem logs filled with signal problems and they won't even look at them. I switched to DSL about 18 months ago and have had 0 problems. The only thing keeping me with Charter for cable is tree coverage, else I'd get some satellite TV provider.

      Charter turns me into a bitch-fest.

    6. Re:In My City by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      As does Comcast. That was one of the first things I did when Comcast started redirecting.

    7. Re:In My City by tresstatus · · Score: 1

      Then they started rolling every goddamn thing into the "digital only" package. "Doesn't cost any more" except that you have to rent a specialized fucking receiver for each goddamn room you want it in, or if you want to actually use the CableCard function built into your TV, they actually charge you MORE to rent the fucking cablecard.

      This statement is incorrect. Comcast gave those receivers out for free for every room of your house. I have 3 of them.

      --
      stephen
    8. Re:In My City by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Then they started rolling every goddamn thing into the "digital only" package. "Doesn't cost any more" except that you have to rent a specialized fucking receiver for each goddamn room you want it in, or if you want to actually use the CableCard function built into your TV, they actually charge you MORE to rent the fucking cablecard.

      Actually at first when they rolled this out last year, it was a good thing. The digital signal was much better than the crappy analog and I had 4 EyeTV tuners recording shows.

      Last month they decided to encrypt it all requiring lame decryption boxes which you have to pay additional fees for.

      Needless to say, TV has been cancelled.

      You screwed yourself Comcrap.

    9. Re:In My City by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Nope. They're charging per-reciever in my city. Comcrap doesn't give shit out for free - there's a rental charge for every TV receiver box, every cablecard, even a rental charge for the damn cable modem.

    10. Re:In My City by Codename+Dutchess · · Score: 1

      What I mean, asshat, is that they're not even needed. I know how to screw on a cable to the modem. I know how to dial a phone number, and ask the same exact Indian lady with the horrible accent to please type in my modems mac address and hit a button on a form.

  6. It's not revenge by Parlett316 · · Score: 1

    It's a reckoning. I've slashed my Comcast to just internet and the most basic nubs tv deal you can get. Thankfully, Verizon came down my road, spray painted the place up and said, "FIOS is coming!"

    Goodbye Comcast!

    1. Re:It's not revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > I've slashed my Comcast to just internet

      Well, me too, but the problem is that where I live they charge the *same damn price* for internet-only as they do for internet + basic cable + VOIP. So my doing this is accomplishing exactly jack shit :-/. It used to be $10/mo cheaper for internet-only, but a few years ago they sent around a nice letter letting me know about their price increase. I called up and bitched heavily, but to no avail.

      And it isn't like I have a choice of providers. There is comcast, and, umm.... satellite or dialup.

    2. Re:It's not revenge by Parlett316 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was cheaper to have internet + nubs cable than just internet.

    3. Re:It's not revenge by edremy · · Score: 1

      DSL works the same way. I wanted just a phone line from Sprint/Embarq/CenturyLink/WhateverTheHellTheyAreNow and was told that I'd need to pay a "line access charge" for a bare DSL line. The line access charge was $5/month less than having full blown home phone.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    4. Re:It's not revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call them again. They recently did away with the bogus charges and DSL is now about $40/month (for the highest speed).

    5. Re:It's not revenge by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      And FIOS is awesome. Especially since the tech installed everything and went to the speedtest part of his "demo". He says we are supposed to get 20/5. Looks like I get 40/10 and burst over 50d. No more charter or comcast. Never again.

  7. Favorite by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite is being on the phone with the cable company after the 4-hour window:
    "Hi, I had an appointment, but nobody came"
    "It says here nobody was home."
    "Listen to me, I took a day off work, in order to sit here and wait for someone who didn't come. A day I could've used to make a 3-day weekend and go somewhere warm. I certainly was in my god damn house"
    "Would you like to reschedule?"
    "Can I schedule it so that I don't have to take a full day?"
    "We can offer you 12pm-4pm or 11am-3pm"
    "Will the technician come this time?"
    "The technician will arrive within 30 minutes of the 4-hour window"
    "So you mean it's a 5 hour window"
    "And you need to be at home" /slams the receiver.

    1. Re:Favorite by trajik2600 · · Score: 2

      I had one of those and took a day off, and the part where I chewed them out was almost identical to yours. The only difference was they scheduled the guy to come out in a four hour window, and after he never showed, I called and was told he did already came.

      "The service technician was already there. Do you still have the problem?"

      "No."

      "Thanks for telling me I needed to be at home then. Vacation time isn't free!"

      The guy fixed whatever was to be fixed without ever coming inside, and also without ever telling me he fixed anything.

    2. Re:Favorite by kingsack · · Score: 1

      This is complete and utter BS and really needs to be stopped. My suggestion - if they fail to show in the required window, for Any reason, they are liable to you for a days pay at whatever your current rate is. To document that they did , ideed show up, in the event that the customer truly is not there (a very small probability, IMHO) they would need to show a timed photograph of the door to the residence, another with their truck in the driveway or lot and phone records showing calls being made immediately before arrival (cellular if at all possible, particularly in the case of customerss using their VOIP services) and which go unanswered. And yes even if the calls are not answered they woukld stuill be required to show up at the door, and ring or knock, may even need to require a sound recording for that.

    3. Re:Favorite by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      This is complete and utter BS and really needs to be stopped. My suggestion - if they fail to show in the required window, for Any reason, they are liable to you for a days pay at whatever your current rate is. To document that they did , ideed show up, in the event that the customer truly is not there (a very small probability, IMHO) they would need to show a timed photograph of the door to the residence

      They'll just take the photo and leave.

      Actually, what they should have is the client's signature. No signature = no visit.

    4. Re:Favorite by migla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Actually, what they should have is the client's signature. No signature = no visit.

      How could the customer give them a signature if the customer really wasn't at home, though?

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    5. Re:Favorite by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is complete and utter BS and really needs to be stopped. My suggestion - if they fail to show in the required window, for Any reason, they are liable to you for a days pay at whatever your current rate is.

      So, take them to civil court for your time, and your time in court, and your court fees. Maybe they'll just settle.

      Personally, I have no wired services but POTS and power, and I'm considering ditching POTS again. The power company doesn't care if you're home, 'cause they can just shut you off at the panel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I _____ (the undersigned) certify that I was not home during the expected hours. Signed _____.

      If it's not signed, then I was home. Works for me.

    7. Re:Favorite by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      When I schedule an appointment for anything, whether it's the cable guys or delivery of some furniture, I point out that I work from home, so being home at the scheduled time won't be a problem. For some reason, I just don't have any problem with workmen lying about me not being home.

      Of course, the fact that I really do work from home means I don't waste a full vacation day if they fix something without ever knocking on the door.

    8. Re:Favorite by ndogg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to work for a cable company (a major one, I might add), and I had that unfortunate conversation with lots of customers.

      What's ironic is that this usually took place in areas where the company I worked for used some local contractors. In areas where the company hired directly, I only heard praise of the technicians, and their punctuality.

      Supposedly it's supposed to be better for businesses to hire locally, but from my experience, the local contractors were lazy fucktards.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    9. Re:Favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never got along with those four-hour windows. I mean, sure, they might try to make it to somewhere at a certain time but be a bit late. I can live with that. But having bloody four hours of tolerance in arrival time and *still* managing to miss the appointment? That takes a *seriously* good excuse. If I can make a phone call when I expect to arrive somewhere 10 minutes late, surely they can call if they expect to be over 4 hours late?

    10. Re:Favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Kinda reminds me of the time last summer when I was sitting on the front porch all afternoon waiting for a FedEx package. I saw a FedEx truck drive past, then 45 minutes later it showed up on the tracking site as "Delivery attempted, customer not available". I called and bitched them out and they honestly didn't seem to care. It was only when I mentioned that I also watched him run the stop sign at the end of the street that they actually got upset.

    11. Re:Favorite by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      This is complete and utter BS and really needs to be stopped. My suggestion - if they fail to show in the required window, for Any reason, they are liable to you for a days pay at whatever your current rate is.

      Well, that's not something you can implement yourself, nor is it necessary. Just simply adopt this rule:

      If they fail to show up in the agreed window, for any reason, call and cancel your service, and explain the reason.

    12. Re:Favorite by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to work for a cable company (a major one, I might add), and I had that unfortunate conversation with lots of customers.

      What's ironic is that this usually took place in areas where the company I worked for used some local contractors. In areas where the company hired directly, I only heard praise of the technicians, and their punctuality.

      Supposedly it's supposed to be better for businesses to hire locally, but from my experience, the local contractors were lazy fucktards.

      Hiring directly in the area and hiring local contractors in the area are both "hiring locally".

      If the company's oversight of its contractors is less effective than its oversight of its employees, then it should be expected that places where it relies on contractors will be less well served than places where it relies on employees to perform similar work. I suspect that this -- differences in degree of accountability -- is more the problem than local contractors being lazier than anyone else.

    13. Re:Favorite by kingsack · · Score: 1

      As much as this might seem to be an adequate response there are some issues: 1) They are allowed to have a virtual monopoly by virtue of agreements with municipalities that prevent competitors from laying infrastructure. 2) Their are non-amortized, up front, setup costs that have been incurred. 3) In many if not most cases their is a contract term involved. They have an effective monopoly and should be regulated in the same way the the Telecoms as well as any other utility with a monopoly position is. Just in a related note, if I fail to show up for a doctor or dentist appointment there is Always a charge and has been for some time. This seems equivalent to me.

    14. Re:Favorite by HawkinsD · · Score: 1

      They will simply drop you as a client if you take them to court.

      --
      Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
    15. Re:Favorite by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right. I should have qualified that statement with "using already established local business (contractors)."

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    16. Re:Favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FedEx (and UPS and DHL and pretty much every carrier other than USPS) will assign their drivers more packages than they can actually deliver within the bounds of their shift and the current laws of physics, so the driver marks any leftovers as "customer not available" and the management winks and nods.

    17. Re:Favorite by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Just in a related note, if I fail to show up for a doctor or dentist appointment there is Always a charge and has been for some time

      That's because the doctor makes you agree to that term before they agree to enter into a business relationship with you.

      If you have failed to exercise your option to refuse to enter into a business arrangement when the terms are unsuitable, the corrective measure is to terminate the unsatisfactory business arrangement. Cable TV is hardly a life necessity, and -- monopoly or not -- cable TV companies can hardly make a profit if consumers simply decide that the service provided isn't worth the hastle.

      Hence, the cable exodus being discussed in this thread.

    18. Re:Favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, except this happened in the middle of the afternoon, long before his shift was supposed to be over. To FedEx's credit, they actually sent him back out on his own time in his own car to deliver the package after his shift was over. Even then, he still insisted to me that he stopped and that I wasn't home. Nevermind that I actually witnessed him drive right by at the exact time he claimed to have "stopped" (yes, the timestamp was literally down to the minute that he drove past).

    19. Re:Favorite by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      in the event that the customer truly is not there (a very small probability, IMHO)
       
      You might be surprised.
       
      I do a number of "small jobs" for a local cable tv/internet/phone company and one of them is selling their service to new customers. I fill out the forms and then phone or email the booking department and get an install time which I provide to the customer.
       
      I had a customer phone me a couple of weeks ago stating that she had not got the service that she had signed up for; nobody came to install it and she wanted to know why and where is her service that she has signed up for. I checked my records and found that her appointment was for THE PREVIOUS MONTH! It took her a whole month after her previous appointment to get around to asking why the tech hadn't showed up.
       
      I phoned the booking department to ask what had happened because, of course, she said the tech had never showed up. I was advised that nobody had been home when the tech arrived. When I told the customer this, she said, "I was out of town that day."
       
      I had another guy who signed up a little while back. "Is there any particular time you would prefer to have the tech arrive?" "No, I'm home all the time so it doesn't matter." "Ok, here is your appointment." "I'm not home that day." "Ok, what time would you prefer instead?" "I'm home all the time so any time will be fine." "Ok, here is your appointment." "I'm not home that day."
       
      Six times.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    20. Re:Favorite by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Simpsons quote:
      Cable Phone Support: Yes, we can send someone out to your house. Can someone be home between 1:00 and July?
      Homer: Yes.

    21. Re:Favorite by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Going by my observations of other outsourced functions (call centers, IT, Etc.), they were probably overbooked and underpaid (and the usual lazy guy or two doesn't help). Someday, some company is going to realize there is a lot of truth to the old adage:

      "If you want something done right, do it yourself."

      (usually uttered by the villain after their hench-persons have been easily foiled yet again; read into that what you will...)

      Of course that would require lower profits, and since most investors cant grasp the concept of "Make $50M this year, and none the next. Or Make $25M a year for the next 8-10 years..." I'm sure it'll never happen.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    22. Re:Favorite by geekoid · · Score: 1

      What needs to happen is the installers calls their office, who then calls the home

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. The link is not safe by mxh83 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It had some chick, I had to close the tab and reload without images

    1. Re:The link is not safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It had some chick, I had to close the tab and reload without images

      We apologize for the inconvenience. We can schedule a technician to come by and check the computer. Can we schedule a 4 hour window? The service fee will be $45, which is non-refundable.

    2. Re:The link is not safe by tagno25 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Link is safe, but borderline. The image is just an advert for their "Sex" section.

    3. Re:The link is not safe by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Interesting approach to getting Slashdotters to RTFA

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  9. Bulletproof Glass by Skraut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked for a small(er) cable company 15 years ago, in their community Television department. We covered city council meetings, parades, had several shows about life in Cleveland etc. It has changed ownerships a few times, and is now Time Warner, and I stopped in not to long ago to see if I still knew anybody who worked there.

    The entire community TV department had been replaced by more call center lackeys answering angry phone calls, and what was more interesting was the main reception area where people could pay their bills has the customer service reps behind bulletproof glass, and there was an armed guard sitting in there.

    If you are doing such bad job servicing your customers needs that you feel you have to protect your employees from customers so angry they might start shooting up the place, maybe, just maybe, you might want to try and improve your customer service a bit...

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:Bulletproof Glass by rwv · · Score: 1

      customer service reps behind bulletproof glass

      Any business who operates with the expectation that their customers will blindly make larger and larger deposits every month is forced to take this precaution to protect against unruly customers who might occasionally want to make a withdrawal when they find out that their money isn't available.

      Any sufficiently advanced business is little more than a cash collection organization, especially when the government can be depended on to pay for critical infrastructures.

    2. Re:Bulletproof Glass by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you are doing such bad job servicing your customers needs that you feel you have to protect your employees from customers so angry they might start shooting up the place, maybe, just maybe, you might want to try and improve your customer service a bit...

      I'll stay away from the whole customer service thing, but, think about the crime angle.

      If you had good enough credit to have a credit card, or even a checking account, you'd pay by mail or online or pretty much do anything other than stand in line. Who enjoys standing in line? Now if the monthly bill is only $100 (you wish), and you're paying in cash pretty much by definition of going there and standing in line, and there's always a line, and there are only two reps (probably more), and the rep takes a pessimistic 5 minutes per bill payment (including a 4 minute nap time?), even pessimistically, that's an absolute minimum cash intake of $2400 per hour. Even if you have an armored car swing by every four hours, that means an armed robber can pull an average of $5K but if he cases the joint out to harvest his cash right before a pickup, thats darn near $10K. At an absolute minimum.

      I defy you to find a legal small office that pulls in more paper money per day. There are plenty of retail establishments with way more dollars in checks or credit card receipts, but not in cash... Maybe a large gentleman's club pulls in more cash, but then again, they have more bouncers...

      Robbers can in fact multiply, even if they have to use a calculator. And that's why they have an armed guard.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Bulletproof Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In my experience, the cable companies were incompetent all around and existed only because they had local monopolies. I worked at a engineering/construction company that built cable networks. Our normal business cycle was, get hired and get plans from the cable company. Review plans then tell the cable company their plans are flawed and the network won't work. Listen to their angry rants then get them to sign a paper saying we told them so. Build network, making note of all the places their diagrams f the existing network were just wrong and disclosing to them the errors. Get paid. Wait for them to come and ask us why the network does not function. Sign second contract to re-engineer and fix the network. Rebuild the network the way we would have done it the first time if they'd listened to our engineers. All those costs got passed on to the customers and this happened for almost every single contract.

    4. Re:Bulletproof Glass by discojohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That assumes 100% of the people are there to pay a bill. In my experience they're there to bitch about yet another issue. In the 4 or 5 times I've stood in line I saw lots of people with a bill in hand (not guns though) and had a problem, like me, with their bill--and I paid online too, it's just more effective to bring up problems in person.

    5. Re:Bulletproof Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Cleveland...

    6. Re:Bulletproof Glass by vlm · · Score: 1

      That assumes 100% of the people are there to pay a bill.

      Correct. On the other hand, charging at least five times per transaction more than a fast food joint, makes up for a lot.

      Even if only 1 in 5 people paid a cash bill, that's still about the same cash flow as a McDonalds. And even McD has people paying by CC and by that electronic "food stamp" card thingy instead of cash.

      And in some bad neighborhoods around here, they do in fact rob McDonalds and shoot employees.

      I bet a cable payment office has more paper cash flow that some small bank branches (like the ones inside food stores)

      Hence, the armed guard.

      Now, if the average bill were back to the 1980's and was merely $17 like in 1983, things might be a bit different.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Bulletproof Glass by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      If you are going to get so mad over your cable bill that you are willing to commit homicide, is the problem really the cable company? Time to reexamine lifes priorities.

    8. Re:Bulletproof Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe the US is weird (okay, I *know* the US is weird), but I pay my electric bill in person.

      When I go down there, I've never, ever seen someone pay in cash. Ever. Except me, once.

      My estimate of their cash intake is perhaps $100 an hour. Way less than what the mini-mart/gas station take is.

      Now, you are probably asking, WTF are people paying with? Well, I'm paying with debit (can't do that remotely), and some others are paying with credit card (they don't accept that except in person). Others are paying late bills and don't want their electricity cut off (except in the winter, when the utility is not allowed to cut off the electricity completely, so they install a device that gives you power every other hour or so), so they're doing it all in person to get it done quickly. Those people are usually paying by rubber cheque, or sometimes cash.

      Any robber who is thinking ahead enough to consider how much cash is being deposited also knows that clerks that handle serious amount of cash generally have to make a drop safe deposit every $100 to $300. And that the clerks have discreet and easy access to a silent alarm. So, without cutting torches we're talking a take of maybe $500-$600 (on a lucky day). With cutting torches, by the time they've got the safe they're pretty much in a cruiser.

      Trust me, anyone who's worked in any job dealing with money outside a bank (and, nowadays, inside a bank too) knows what I'm saying is gospel. Ever wondered the real reason why nobody will take your hundreds? Counterfeiting is just one side of the story. It's because they only have $50 in $5 bills, $20 in $10 bills, and $30 in change (modify that a bit for those in the USA as you don't have $1+ coins) in the drawer. Breaking one $100 bill for a small item kills that drawer for the day until the manager shows up with more change.

      If you're wondering how cashiers deal with change, there's two ways. Either the manager is lazy and leaves a coin "purchase" shelf stocked with coins/bills for you to trade larger stuff in the drawer for (eg: $20 bill for $20 in coins), or they have a more professional change machine that you can feed money into so the employees can't steal, which happens a lot when you have to hire people with criminal records due to the criminally low wages (Criminally low because most people in these jobs get paid minimum wage and are expected to come into work early and stay late, unpaid).

    9. Re:Bulletproof Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first and last time I went to a Comcast service center was to pick up a new HDDVR box and upgrade my service for HD. One person ahead of me and I was in there for a total of 10 minutes and walked out with the equipment in hand and my service changed. I expected the worse but it was not bad at all.

    10. Re:Bulletproof Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who don't have plastic pay with money orders, not cash. Instead of getting a bank account, they pay up to a 10% fee to spend their money. Too irresponsible to balance a check book so they get slammed with overdraft fees. They can't handle a bank account, it's too hard. And they spend $50 a week on cigars to smoke their weed out of instead of using a pipe.

      I've lived in the ghetto working as a landlord for the last 3 years.

      The lower class is so goddamn stupid.

      I hate my job/life.

    11. Re:Bulletproof Glass by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      Wow, for once the US doesn't seem weird. In general any non-cash transaction can be done via internet or phone, including credit, debit and checks. The vast majority of the people who are paying in person are going to be paying in cash because everyone else is doing it remotely. There might be a few people paying by non-cash who simply prefer to do everything in person or are just in the habit of doing things that way, but they are increasingly less common.

    12. Re:Bulletproof Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people in line at the checks cashed place are getting a utility bill paid and the rest in cash. maybe they buy your money orders there too because most landlords don't take cash...otherwise they would be paying in cash.

      blunt wrappers are 3 for a dollar at the corner store in the hood, they aren't buying cohibas you idiot.

    13. Re:Bulletproof Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually a very good scenario for some cases. I worked for a large utility and sometimes had to do computer work in an office in a small town on the American side of the Mexican border. The illegals don't have bank accounts so that small office, frequently had tens of thousands of dollars in cash that was collected from illegals paying their bills. The area is hot in the summer and the bills tend from $150.00 up a month. The cash adds up fast.

  10. Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by arkham6 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Simple. The three plan (Internet, TV, Phone) all worked out to be cheaper and better. I got faster and more importantly, more reliable internet. When I was with cablevision/Optimum Online I would get maybe 5Mbit speeds that would flake out during prime time hours since they were over subscribed. Now I get 20 Mbit consistently, even during peek usage hours. The TV was a better quality image, more channels and more innovative products (Multi room DVR rocks). Phone is nothing exciting, but since we also have cell phones with verizon, we get a small discount for linking all our bills together.

    Overall, I got the impression that cablevision simply stopped innovating since they were the only game in town, and they did not care that much about their customers. They sure got a big surprise from Verizon, and they are calling us up every week it seems begging us to come back.

    1. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by rwv · · Score: 1

      I still use Comcast. I'll be the first one on my block to be on the phone with Verizon when they finally decide to roll out their fiber optic service to my neighborhood.

      I'm also in a seemingly rare area where Comcast has natural cable company competition. Trouble is... it's a company called RCN that (at least for my experiences) sucks worse than Comcast.

    2. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Miros · · Score: 1

      Cablevision has pretty terrible customer service, and their ads have always been designed to mislead (which rubs me the wrong way). But I would disagree that they stopped innovating. In response to Verizon rolling out FiOS service, they began offering service all the way up to the 100Mbit level to compete on what is really their core business: providing more bandwidth. However they are going to have to get a bit more innovative when it comes to providing TV service. Slow cable boxes, limited boring service, and a laughable on-demand system when compared to what you can get on an xbox/roku is not going to keep customers paying their high monthly video cable bills.

      Full Disclosure: I am also a former cablevision customer who has been using FiOS for about...four years? can't remember, early adopter anyway.

    3. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon will squeeze you on price each time your contract is up. Your TV packages will mysteriously no longer exist and will only be available within bigger split collections, that coincidentally cost more, your net connection is likely to be 5mbps faster - at a cost. If you don't like these changes, you can resort to month to month and pay more than you do now because your deal/package doesn't exist.

      If you decide to improve your package, more channels, fast broadband, check your bill. Verizon may have included an early termination charge, even though you're given them more money. This is simple to remove, but you'll spend a good hour bouncing around various departments on the phone before anyone will help you.

    4. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by migla · · Score: 1

      >and they are calling us up every week it seems begging us to come back.

      If a company was calling me up every week I'd entertain the thought of hiring goons to go bust some kneecaps. Then I'd remember I'm supposed to be a pacifist and pursue some other avenue. At the very least, I'd just say "Fuck you" and hang up every time they called if I couldn't automatically screen the call due to hidden or different numbers. Surely there must be a way to get them to stop calling if you'd want to?

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    5. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Suzumushi · · Score: 1

      I was in your shoes until I got the email that Uverse is available for my home a couple weeks ago. My install is scheduled for next week. I can't wait to cancel the Comcast, that phone call will be very satisfying. (I am going to give them a chance though; 'every channel, premium movie channels, foreign channels, EVERYTHING, for life, at the price of their most basic service', then I won't cancel my TV service... internet would still be Uverse though...) I am slightly curious to see if Comcast will improve its service now that it has a competitive market to deal with instead of a monopoly, and in a way I hope that they do. After all, if the companies rolling out fiber put them out of business, then we'll be back to the same bad situation we were in for the last decade, just with a different tyrant.

    6. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "peek usage hours" - What exactly are you peeking at? Perhaps those peek hours would be from about 11pm until 1am, surfing anonymously, with one hand on the mouse, and one hand...

    7. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by tyen · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...with Verizon when they finally decide to roll out their fiber optic service to my neighborhood.

      You are going to be waiting a long, long time, as Verizon has stopped their FIOS expansion for the indefinite future. Why anyone in a FIOS-served area would ever choose any competitor for Internet service is beyond me; their sell-through rate (ratio of subscribers to all potential subscribers) on their Internet service should be way, way higher than its current 25% or so. I'm currently waiting for AT&T Uverse service to reach my area.

    8. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in North Jersey, Cablevision and FIOS tend to be priced about the same. Verizon just started a new promotion that makes FIOS a little cheaper, so I'm curious if Cablevision will respond.

      Cablevision download speeds have consistently been at least 10 MBit since I got service in '03. If I download a Linux distrib via torrent I always get over 1 MB/sec. They've had the Boost package with 30 Mbit service since at least that time as well, but I never felt the need for it. They're up to 100 Mbit as an option now.

      Any time I've called for service I've had barely any hold time, and they send someone out within 2 business days. No complaints there.

      The only issue I've really had was the installer when I moved was a bit of an ass - he wanted to drill holes all over rather than fix the issues with the existing wiring. I spent more time arguing with him over that than it ended up taking to fix the wiring. The installers aren't Cablevision employees though, they're outside contractors who get paid by the job, so he just wanted to get out quick.

      The last gripe I have is they required a technician to install the cable card in my HD Tivo. Rather lame to have to pay $70 for a guy to stick a card in the box and read a number off the screen to the call center. At least it was a one time thing though.

      So, overall I've been extremely happy with them with not much to complain about. They also get bonus points in my book for their work with the Lustgarten Foundation.

    9. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, what issues have you had with their customer service?

      Any time I've called I've spent under a minute on hold before getting an agent, they've always been extremely pleasant to deal with, and someone comes quickly to fix the problem.

    10. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by EllisDees · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I recently moved to Seattle and was looking into fios, but freaking Comcast still has some antiquated exclusive franchise deal with the city that won't let Verizon offer it to anyone. How does this make sense in any world?

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    11. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we've been using fiber since 1991!" (yeah, fiber to the node, not to my house, and yes, people know the difference).

      The thing I don't get is, why should people care?

      Is the 50 Mbit FIOS max speed over fiber somehow better than the 100 Mbit over coax option from the cable company?

    12. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by game+kid · · Score: 1

      My chief gripe with Cablevision is not that they have bad service (at least from a TV technical standpoint, as they have a ton of channels that rarely drop if at all), or even that they try to maintain their monopoly on coverage area and programming while trying to avoid carrying broadcast stations, but that they wield monopoly power in other areas and make Comcast and Microsoft look utterly inept at it, and it barely registers on Slashdot.

      Sadly, I know people that, in their words, "need" these vile cowards' cable. It's like I have a truth mom on my back.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    13. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse. You could have Broadstripe (formerly known as Millenium) Cable like many people in the Central District or in a number of condo/apartment buildings all around town. As bad as Comcast is, Broadstripe is simply awful.

    14. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Miros · · Score: 1

      You're right about that. Cable companies could easily deliver more bandwidth over that coax cable than a family of four would be able to saturate. My experience though was coming from Cablevision. When I was an "Optimum" customer they would impose upload caps at the drop of a hat and I was never able to achieve my advertised bandwidth (they just oversold it back then). From what I understand they have since improved on these performance dimensions but I have not had a compelling reason to switch back, so I haven't (some Newton's law of consumer subscription services?)

    15. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Miros · · Score: 1

      Their support services have gotten pretty good, but they wont stop calling me to try and sell me Voice and Data services (I use cablevision for my cable, and verizon for FiOS service). Every 30 days, like clockwork, they call me. Every time I explain that I don't want either services, that I don't care what specials they are running, to please for the love of god, stop calling me over and over and over again. Every time they say they wont anymore, and every time it's a freaking lie. I hate that.

    16. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It makes sense in Comcast's world. Don't like it? get involved.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Why I switched from Cablevision to FIOS by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I recently moved to Seattle and was looking into fios, but freaking Comcast still has some antiquated exclusive franchise deal with the city that won't let Verizon offer it to anyone. How does this make sense in any world?

      Welcome to Seattle!

      Yes, comcast sucks dog dicks, swallows, then licks the dogs ass.

      Also, you might have trouble finding FO to your home, since they don't do that.
      Qwest owns the phone lines (or so they tell me), and said I was welcome to find another ISP then MSN that uses their lines, if I could find one. And yes, i asked them who else leased there lines, but they claimed they didn't know.

      You'd think, Seattle, since it's the home (basicly) to Microshaft, err, i mean, microsoft and other tech companies, we'd have better online service.

      but we don't. sorry.

      got some good weed around here though.

      --
      Be seeing you...
  11. Why stop at cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last month I got sick of my Comcast bill creeping higher and higher without my consent or notification. I cut it. I get my TV over the air and the quality is _better_ because it isn't compressed further to cram more channels into a finite bandwidth. I paid 17 dollars for an antenna and 40 dollars for a distribution amplifier. That's still less than a month's worth of cable TV. I went back to a copper landline for increased reliability and a cheaper price. I get my internet from FiOS to stream netflix and other internet videos. I suddenly find myself with entertainment that is better in quantity, quality, and price. Who needs 900 lousy quality channels all with nothing good on?

    1. Re:Why stop at cable? by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Do the companies really think there's that much value in having so many channels? It's not like we can watch more than say, 5 at once (generously assuming you DVR a few and make up the rest in extra boxes). It's a silly model, honestly, considering that I can get whatever I want, whenever I want it through the internet.

      If anything, cable companies should work on phasing TV out, rather than trying to save it. But the TV model works out great for them. That'd just be in the customer's interest, that's all.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    2. Re:Why stop at cable? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      A lot of those 500 channels is just recycled old crap from either Hollywood
      or the broadcast networks but butchered and with more commercials. Most of
      the rest is really stupid dreck that is easy to do without. A few things
      are actually worthwhile. Although they might be cheaper to replace just by
      directly paying for them (like on DVD).

      The worst is the stuff on HDNET. Short of the home shopping networks, that's
      about the most expendable channel on cable.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Why stop at cable? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      OTA is nice, and if I could seamlessly integrate that into a DVR at a good price I would, but that's not cheap or easy. Watching TV when its actualy being broadcast is both difficult when you have a family, and more often, not age appropriate viewing. Lack of at least 1 DVR in the house and we might as well not have TV at all.

      As for net based viewing, best i can get here is 8dn/384up, and that's $50 a month, and I've never reached over 4.5dn on it anyway, and if the wife tries uploading anything (or my backups kick in) the upstream is so saturated even loading web pages fails more than it succeeds. Fios and uVerse are not available, and AT&T is actually marginally better than TWC. Technically, i can get a faster speed from TWC, but not for less than $100 a month, and at that price, satellite is actualyl the cheaper (and superior) option...

      This is why the FCC needs to become SO much more invested in ensuring open competition and regulation in TV distribution and Internet roll out. They ALSO need to get personally involved in HOAs that block new services from deploying, especially when the HOA is subsidized by a provider in that provider's best interest...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    4. Re:Why stop at cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done the exact same thing, I get a great experience from Netflicks, and a great picture from broadcast TV.

      Very low Monthly recurring charges!!

    5. Re:Why stop at cable? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Do the companies really think there's that much value in having so many channels?

      No, they think there is value in having exactly the channels you want, and virtually no cost in having extra channels. For a few well defined interest groups with large customer basis, they can do that fairly well without lots of extra channels (where "exactly the channels you want" are "every sports channel imaginable" or "every Spanish-language channel imaginable"), for everyone else -- since its simpler to have standardized packages -- its easier to just rely on bigger bundles.

  12. wrong strategy by hort_wort · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem isn't when the service men show up to fix a problem -- it's that there's a problem at all. We've had internet outages 20+ times a day since Comcast acquired the local cable company. All they had to do was not touch anything and it would've been fine. But instead, they screwed it up, and have sent people to our house on 4 occasions trying to fix it. They have no idea what the problem is. They don't need help that shows up on time, they need help that can get the job done on the first visit.

    1. Re:wrong strategy by sjames · · Score: 1

      I still can't get Comcast to understand that not being able to query my modem can be a problem on their network just as easily as it can be a problem with my modem.

  13. They may be providing better service by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    But more likely they're buying into satellite and internet services. Wouldn't you?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  14. Am I the only one that likes Time Warner Cable? by alen · · Score: 0

    i have it in NYC, $130 a month for cable, internet, telephone, DVR and all the local taxes they have to charge.i always have a month of cartoons DVRd for my son to watch. the DRV software is laggy and slow but overall the service is good. can't remember when i had an internet outage. unlimited calling phone is nice along with caller ID info being on the TV when someone calls. i have hundreds of channels to choose from. sometimes i'll turn on Dirty Jobs or some show on Discovery Channel with lots of trucks building something and my 2 year old loves to watch it.

    i have more HD channels than I need and it's included in that price. every time i wanted to switch i looked up the competition like RCN and no one had the HD channel selection. or they wanted more money for it. over the last 7 years i had one billing problem. if equipment breaks i take it to a time warner store and get it replaced with no questions asked. almost like the Apple Store.

    my inaws have Cablevision with the same package and are happy as well. a few weeks after they got it FIOS came to their neighborhood. They showed me the card and I looked it up. it costs more than cable, less international channels, they nickel and dime you for features included in the all in one cable package. i'll stay with cable.

    1. Re:Am I the only one that likes Time Warner Cable? by Miros · · Score: 1

      Not everyone wants the same things from their providers, and not all customers receive the same quality of care, network, etc. Hey, if what you has makes you happy then that's great! But it doesn't mean that it should therefore also make everyone else happy.

    2. Re:Am I the only one that likes Time Warner Cable? by akboss · · Score: 1

      I moved to Texas and signed up with Suddenlink. Got a wireless router with no set up involved, 200 cable channels, 8Meg internet (usually 10) and unlimited phone for $105. When they said they would be out they showed up. No 11-3 or 12-4 they gave 2 hour windows for service time. I have only had 1 interruption of service (30 minutes) and it was because of Ma Nature. Seems they place crews in various location when they expect trouble so they can respond quickly. Compared to GCI in Alaska this is a breath of fresh air.

      --
      "Remember, politicians and diapers should be changed often and for the same reason."
    3. Re:Am I the only one that likes Time Warner Cable? by alen · · Score: 1

      mine is the same price except it's $12.95 to rent the DVR. Tivo is like $300 plus the service. the Time Warner DVR may not be as good as the Tivo, but it's good enough for my son't cartoons and the 5 shows my wife watches every week

    4. Re:Am I the only one that likes Time Warner Cable? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Triple play customers seem to be the only one getting a deal, so you may very well be in the sweet spot of value for the service. Especially when the DVR fills a high value need (just please don't let it do your parenting for you) if you are using it daily it can make a lot of sense.

      As a person who wants nothing to do with a local phone line, that leaves me just needing video and internet. Maybe they are pricing it wrong, but I can get 6mbit internet for $35; if I want a "standard lineup" with *one* HD-capable DVR box, it adds about $80 a month to the bill! When I spend most of my time either using the internet via PC or using the internet to watch Netflix, Hulu, etc. it's hard as hell to justify tripling the bill just to get cable service that I would spend less than an hour a day (on average) using.

  15. Or, you can just do what we did... by Pojut · · Score: 1

    ...and forgo TV alltogether. Hockey game on? I'll stream it online or listen on the radio. TV show that seems cool? Hulu or Netflix. Don't even try to convince me that channels like HBO are worth the premium...again, Netflix.

    1. Re:Or, you can just do what we did... by fropenn · · Score: 1

      Where are you finding streaming hockey games? I would love to get rid of the dish but live sports are hard to find (especially hockey and F1).

    2. Re:Or, you can just do what we did... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      In my case, I will just Google "Streaming Capitals vs ::insert team they are playing here::". Every now and then, you will find someone temporarily streaming a feed from CSN or ESPN (this is how I watched Game 7 of Caps vs Canadiens during the playoffs); I'd say just under half the games during the regular season can be found online, if you do a little digging.

      Your other option is to pay the $120 or so dollars a year from the NHL's official site, and stream it from there. Typically, though, I'll just stream it over internet radio. The local sports station that Capitals games broadcast on is pretty weak in our chill room, so Internet Radio it is.

  16. Quick cable companies! by AUSman · · Score: 0

    Quick cable companies, blame your failing business model on those dirty pirates!

  17. Happy telco customer by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a VERY happy Verizon FiOS customer, I can tell you that cable absolutely has something to worry about. The installer showed up when he said he would, did a good job, and the service is absolutely perfect (and actually came out a few pennies cheaper than the cable company's equivalent triple play).

    So it's no surprise that the cable company is running ads that say things like "40% of customers switched back to cable!" (they had to *really* mess with the sample set to get that number) and "we've been using fiber since 1991!" (yeah, fiber to the node, not to my house, and yes, people know the difference).

    What's the creepy part? I've become a cheerleader for the phone company. That just blows my mind.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Happy telco customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not have been stuck in Verizon customer service hell yet. They lost one of my payments and it was total hell to get it applied to my account. One would think, "cancelled check, easy"...nope. Every taxing authority I've ever dealt with, including the IRS can find your payment if you send them a cancelled check but not Verizon!

    2. Re:Happy telco customer by Walterk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've become a cheerleader [..]

      Some things just can't be unread and unimagined.

    3. Re:Happy telco customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mod point ... my kingdom for a mod point ...

    4. Re:Happy telco customer by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I've been doing credit card payments ever since Verizon couldn't figure out how to credit my payments to the right account.

      Every time I'd send them a check, they'd credit to a different account (yes, I sent them the correct account number), and then they'd send me:

      1. A past-due bill with late charges.
      2. (Much later) A check to refund my payment.

      It was comical - I couldn't get them to take my money. With the credit card system they seem to be able to credit it to the right account...

    5. Re:Happy telco customer by Solandri · · Score: 1

      What's the creepy part? I've become a cheerleader for the phone company. That just blows my mind.

      While their customer service leaves a lot to be desired, keep in mind that the phone companies think 99.99% uptime isn't good enough. When is the last time you picked up a phone and didn't get a dial tone (natural disasters and national emergencies excepted)? They take reliability seriously, unlike the cable companies.

    6. Re:Happy telco customer by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      I've become a cheerleader [..]

      Some things just can't be unread and unimagined.

      Don't say he didn't warn you:

      What's the creepy part? I've become a cheerleader [..]

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    7. Re:Happy telco customer by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Not so much in my area, possibly because I am covered by FIOS. A year ago I started getting very spotty service on my Verizon POTS line. When I called them up to complain they gave me a song and dance about the fact I had AT&T as my local carrier, that I should dump my cable and switch to FIOS and basically told me that there was no way they were going to fix my POTS line.

      After that disgusting call I am now using my Cable company's VOIP service. And I won't go NEAR anything with a Verizon logo on it.

      TWITS.

  18. Yep, cable operators suck by William+Robinson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yep, the cable operators suck big way.

    Back in 2001, when I decided to go for Cogeco, Canada (their reputation was better than others), I didn't believe the mess they made me go through. The installation never happened thanks to time mismatches. And customer care rep had hard time to figure out that I am not going to be home for 24 hours and she needs to give me some scheduled time. That made me finally decide not to go for their service and I told her over phone to cancel the installation with assurance from her that I will not be charged for anything since installation did not go through.

    To my horror, after a month I started getting their bills. My calls and explanations made them stop bills, but few weeks later, I started getting calls from some lady looking after Credibility issues demanding me why I haven't paid their bills yet.

    I fought back with every evidence I had, discussed with their top guys and sorted it out. But looking at what I have gone through with other operators, I feel Cogeco was far better than other lot. Tells you everything.

  19. I've long said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather get my cable service from the phone company rather than my phone service from the cable company.

  20. Paying for rent by red_dragon · · Score: 1

    FTFS: Cable TV companies are trying to treat customers better.

    As well they have to. Comcast's new digs ain't gonna pay for themselves, ya know.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  21. You know "Biff" used to be a derogatory term. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOW IT'S EVERYONE!!! Biff is taking over the world.

  22. Going it Apple TV-style...for now by Spencerian · · Score: 1

    Comcast's customer service has been good for me, but their costs, not so much.

    With a $150/month bill, I turned off the TV side, turned in the receivers and bought a new flat-screen and an Apple TV, which I use through my Comcast internet to download content.

    With the Apple TV I can itemize the few cable TV programs I watch, such as "No Reservations" from the Travel Channel and "Mythbusters." The iTunes Store lets me buy these shows as a season for the cost of 1/3 of a month's bill, rather than renting. Being able to buy or rent popular movies on the fly is a nice touch, too.

    The Apple TV isn't a perfect solution. But I'm not a typical customer, so I know how and when to record or rip content from other sources as needed. I keep up with live stuff from my HD broadcast antenna. Strange to say, I've not missed national cable news.

    For all else, I pull around the laptop and watch it from Hulu. If I really wanted, I'll connect my laptop to the HDTV with a DisplayPort to HDTV connector, straight into the TV.

    The biggest problem in going this route is storage. Had to upgrade hard drives as the iTunes content rests on the ATV drive as well as the central laptop HD.

    And yes, since the food is good, I like being "enslaved" to iTunes. But I'm more like Colonel Hogan, who only looks imprisoned and steps out of Stalag iTunes every so often for additional stuff.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  23. Comcast's lie first policy. by Desolation+Row · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About a year and a half ago, my Comcast internet service failed for about 12 hours on a Saturday evening, so I called to complain. There was no report of an outage, they lied, but they would make a note of it. The next Saturday it failed again, so I called again. They not only repeated the "no report of any problems" lie, they refused to issue me a credit because this was my first complaint (i.e, they claimed I hadn't called the week before).

    So I canceled right then. The first available customer service witch made the process as difficult as possible, and insisted a technician had to come to uninstall the internet modem. Of course, no one ever showed up on the appointed day.

    Comcast already had their "on-time or $20 guarantee", but when I called to complain, another Comcast witch not only cackled that wasn't I going to get my $20, but proudly boasted that she wouldn't connect me to one of their fake supervisors, and ha ha, in Illinois there is absolutely no one you can complain to. (I did have fun leading them on retaliatory wild goose chases for their equipment over the next few months).

    But wait. There is a punch line.

    About two weeks after I'd canceled, I got a form letter from Comcast which, after briefly apologizing for the overnight outages, explained that they were incurred during the process of doubling my area's download speed from 10Mbps to 20Mbps.

    Heh. If only they hadn't trained their customer service witches to always lie first.

  24. Insight has been doing this for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insight has been treating their customers with value and respect for years in the Midwest. Highly recommended.

  25. Goodbye, cable by calderra · · Score: 1

    In my area, I have two options for internet service: 1) Pay Comcast $60+ for a connection that flakes out constantly, is monitored and throttled, goes out during peak usage, and is subject to change without notice. 2) Pay ATT $20+ for a dry-loop DSL that only goes out for one day every six months or so, but otherwise works as advertised. Either way, screw cable ($60+/mo for freaking TV? You gotta be kidding me! People actually pay that!?), I stream and Netflix all my viewing.

  26. obligatory Seinfeld reference by SureshotM6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    JERRY: Well, said he was waiting about two hours. Seemed a little put out.
    KRAMER: Oh, was he? Was he? I guess the cable man doesn't like to be kept waiting.
    JERRY: You don't seem too bothered by it.
    KRAMER: You remember what they did to me ten years ago? "Oh, we'll be there in the morning between nine and one", or "We'll be there between two and six"! (quiet anger) And I sat there, hour after hour, without so much as a phone call. Finally, they show up, no apology, tracking mud all over my nice clean floors. (malice) Now, they want me to accommodate them. Well, looks like the shoe's on the other foot, doesn't it?
    JERRY: Boy, I've never seen you like this.
    KRAMER: Oh, you don't wanna get on my bad side.

  27. Truth. OTA rocks by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When "basic" cable costs $20 or more a month and is basically the same channel lineup you can get OTA, why the heck would you bother subscribing when you can take that first $20 bill payment, get a cheap antenna to hide in your attic, and get crisp, clean HDTV for free.

    Since cable availability has been ubiquitous for so long, I always thought that broadcast TV was a dying art; and subsequently that the HDTV rollout was a death-throw or at best an exercise in futility. Now, having canceled my IPTV based cable over a year ago and relying solely on broadcast TV and the internet, I can say that I will have a very hard time ever justifying $50 to $70 a month for cable channels of actual interest.

    Suck on that, cable companies.

  28. Why I quit cable by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I've heard that Time Warner is better now, but in late 2003, my internet was down more than it was up. The service monkeys couldn't fix the problems, so I tried DSL. TW claimed their internet was faster than DSL, and it probably was, but the DSL worked nearly all the time compared to 50% for TW. And since I was no longer using their internet, there were no barriers to switching to DirecTV for television.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Why I quit cable by VorlonFog · · Score: 1

      This is what happened to me. TWC couldn't maintain their own network, and continues to allow third-party contractors to repeatedly fuck things up. High speed isn't worth the cost when it's frequently down for long stretches. DSL might be slow, but it's been rock-solid stable for years.

  29. why I hate Charter by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate Charter, our local cable company, with a passion. We still use them for Internet only because we don't really have another choice. As soon as something else becomes available we'll drop them like a hot potato.

    I didn't hate them originally... We've been Charter customers for years - basically because that's the only option for cable TV in our town. We had Bell Atlantic (now Verizon) DSL for Internet, and Charter for TV. I wouldn't have changed anything, but we were moving out of town and couldn't get DSL there. Had to switch to Charter Internet.

    On the move day we had a call scheduled with Charter.

    We had Vonage for phones, so I'd explained to them that they couldn't call that phone number to confirm that somebody was home. I gave them my cell phone number to call.

    We waited and waited... Couldn't make as many trips with the U-Haul because somebody had to hang around the house. Nobody ever called. Nobody ever showed up.

    Turns out they were calling the disabled Vonage account, instead of my cell phone.

    We scheduled a second call... Made sure they had the cell phone on record... Took out the Vonage number entirely...

    They showed up this time. But then they decided that we were actually some previous owner who'd failed to pay some bills. So instead of hooking up our Internet (the TV was already working for some reason) they turned off our TV.

    We had to go down to the local Charter offices with various forms of ID to prove that we weren't actually that previous owner who'd failed to pay the bills. Then we got another install date scheduled. And they actually showed up to install things - about a month after we'd moved at this point.

    And since we used Vonage for our phones, we were without phones (besides my cell) for that month.

    Since that time we've had an assortment of issues. It's horribly unreliable. So much so that we gave up on Vonage and got everyone cell phones.

    And the prices keep going up. Eventually we dropped them for TV and went with DirecTV.

    The Internet performance is crap. When I call technical support I have to use my old cell phone number to look up the account, because they can't manage to update their records. Their technicians aren't even in the same state as me, so they never know if we're having issues in the local area or not. They just want me to reboot my modem - over and over again. And then they tell me that my wireless is bad, when I don't have any wireless, and try to sell me an upgrade.

    Seriously, I will drop Charter Internet as soon as it is possible.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:why I hate Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree the techs are crap with charter, but i have found a few ways that will make the crappy internet a little better. Most places that charter supports always seem to have the older RG59 coax cable, which was good for a few anolog channels years ago but now its not good enough, i replace the hundred feet of rg59 in our apartment with RG6, and noticed an immediate gain, i also terminated all open splitter connections, and removed a cut cable that was still plugged in. I tightened all loose connectors (they all were loose), and last we just need to ground out the cable system. i Got a good 3+db gain which improved everything for a bit.

      basically do the work yourself and it gets done right

  30. You can't get live sports online W/out blackouts by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    You can't get live sports online W/out blackouts.

  31. In Estonia cable isn't that bad actually by nomaddamon · · Score: 1

    I've got a choice:
    * 41$ a month for 100mbps internet, 80+ digital tv channels and phone from out local telco
    * 39$ a month for 100mbps internet, 80+ digital tv channels and phone from out local cable company

    I chose cable since telco requires you to use a set-top box in addition to your tv (yey for another remote!)

  32. Am I the odd man out here? by sunking2 · · Score: 0

    In the 15+ years I've been on my own I can count the number of times that I've had to call any of the utlities on one hand and most of those times are just to call up and schedule an install. Yet all around me all I hear is complaints about service. Am I just lucky, or do people just need to chill out a little bit?

    1. Re:Am I the odd man out here? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Actually for the 35 or so years I've been on my own, service in general has been pretty good. And I've had access to the Internet since... damn, I can't recall :)

      (Hmm, do you count Johns Hopkins in 89 or BBS's since 84?)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    2. Re:Am I the odd man out here? by harl · · Score: 1

      In the last 12 or so years I've had one really bad case. So bad it required government involvement to be solved. That was due to an employee completely fucking up an account switch over.

      Other than that Charter has the best internet in town. It's gone down once in the 6 years I've been here. I'm constantly able to max out the connection. No clue how their TV is.

      This in a market where they have no competition. The only other non-option is the phone company. They will sell you a DSL line that's 5% the speed of Charter.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
  33. The Last Straw by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    I finally bailed on my cable a little while ago. There were a lot of problems, including spotty internet service. The cable subscription included basic TV service, but only because that was cheaper than internet by itself. The rates kept going up and up for no reason. Then they call me and tell me they're no longer going to support my cable modem and I can't buy a new one, I have to rent one from them or they won't support it... but they'll still provide the service... oh and the rates are going up as well. Whatever, I'm too busy to mess with it. Then the cable goes dark because by still providing the service to an unsupported cable modem they meant, we'll shut it off because we don't have the MAC address in our list and charge you anyway... but not tell our customer service department that's what we're doing. After three service calls without the two departments figuring it out, I told them to just cancel the bloody service. Then, of course, they offer me discounted rates, when it is way, way, way too late. Luckily DSL rates had just dropped to be about the same price. AT&T has a monster bureaucracy too, but at least they have reliable service.

  34. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simple, that 100$ worth of DTV boxes wont pick up anything for more than random slideshows 10 miles outside of the city

    OTA was great, now it is worthless unless you live pretty close to the source

    heck I could not even get PBS when I lived in the city

  35. a good experience by cedrick12 · · Score: 1

    The best cable service I ever had was in Columbus GA. There were three local cable companies each had service to the neighborhood. I was renting in an older neigborhood so naturally there were problems with the cable running to the house. But unlike every where else I have lived the cable company I chose did everything possible to make the service work perfectly. After about six months my cable router got fried, I called the company after work and after about 10 minutes with the help desk they called a technician in the area and he delivered a new router at 8pm. He stayed until he verified that all service was working properly. Unfortunately I can't say the same for other places I have lived. I'm currently with AT&T and the service is "OK". Not great, just "OK". My experience tells me that competition breeds excelence.

  36. Sports over Internet? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I pay an extra $10/mo because [my cable Internet is] not part of a bundle

    Where I live, Comcast charges an extra $17/mo, which comes dangerously close to the price of lifeline cable.

    I take the money I'm saving and buy shows a-la-carte on the xbox 360 or apple tv.

    Can you get sports that way?

    1. Re:Sports over Internet? by JerkBoB · · Score: 1

      I take the money I'm saving and buy shows a-la-carte on the xbox 360 or apple tv.

      Can you get sports that way?

      Probably not in a way that's acceptable to a dedicated fan. I watch OTA HD stuff occasionally which would work OK for NFL if you're happy with the local team (Go Pats!).

      Incidentally, I do see sports broadcasting as being a major kink in the plan to dismantle traditional TV. It's not practical to stream live to everyone, and I'm not sure that multicast would work without some kind of closed hardware/software solution to restrict it to subscribers. Requiring a PC to watch is a nonstarter -- it'd have to be some kind of magic box with HDMI output.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    2. Re:Sports over Internet? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

      Requiring a PC to watch is a nonstarter -- it'd have to be some kind of magic box with HDMI output.

      There are a couple solutions for that. One is Logitech's Google TV box. Another is Acer Aspire Revo, a Wii-size PC with NVIDIA graphics and HDMI output.

    3. Re:Sports over Internet? by JerkBoB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Solving the technical problems isn't a big challenge if you ignore all the politics and other nontechnical machinations at work. Realistically, there is no way the NFL, NASCAR, MLB, etc. would allow their content to be multicast without solid protection of their revenue streams. And to even get to that point, you either need to convince them to throw together their own multicasting infrastructure (complete with closed clients), or, more likely, some single entity needs to invent a magic "sports box" and strike deals with all the sports entities.

      It's a mess. And all of that completely ignores the fact that the average consumer Internet connection is never going to be as reliable as plain old cable/satellite.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    4. Re:Sports over Internet? by initdeep · · Score: 1

      i think you missed the point.
      it doesn't just need to have an HDMI output, it has to be a protected system with HDMI output.

      Sports is the single largest thing saving cable/satellite right now.

      try watching Baseball on OTA TV. You'll get at most two games a week or so.
      The rest are carried by ESPN, Comcast sports, Fox Sports, TBS, and some other regional Sports Networks (NESN, YES).

      Now try the same thing with Hockey.

      NFL is the one sport that still has most of it's games available for free OTA.

      Even basketball is more non-free than free.

    5. Re:Sports over Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mlb.tv package is expensive if you're not a dedicated fan. But for a fan who resides out of town anyways, its ~$1 per game. The point here being, that MLB already has a distribution model over the intertubes, which does not require cable television.

    6. Re:Sports over Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all of that completely ignores the fact that the average consumer Internet connection is never going to be as reliable as plain old cable/satellite.

      Except that the "average consumer Internet connection" is a "plain old cable" connection. How do you thinks the docsis standard works, anyway?

    7. Re:Sports over Internet? by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Requiring a PC to watch is a nonstarter -- it'd have to be some kind of magic box with HDMI output.

      You don't have a few computers at home?

      What are you doing on Slashdot?

    8. Re:Sports over Internet? by mzs · · Score: 1

      Can you get sports that way?

      No, but you can watch at a sports bar.

    9. Re:Sports over Internet? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Except that the "average consumer Internet connection" is a "plain old cable" connection. How do you thinks the docsis standard works, anyway?

      Analog cable is certainly not DOCSIS. Digital cable isn't DOCSIS either unless you open On Demand.

    10. Re:Sports over Internet? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      This will probably erode the market for broadcast sports. There is a sizable percentage of people for whom watching sports is a priority, and they will choose whatever option for receiving media allows them to do so. Then there are those who enjoy and watch if it is available, but don't prioritize it to the point they will choose a certain method of accessing media to get it.

      As more people start to eschew the normal ways of receiving media, cable and satellite, the organizations you mention will lose customers, unless they take some steps to keep them.

    11. Re:Sports over Internet? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, I'm not a sports fan. In fact, I find organized commercial sports kind of detestable.

      But didn't sports fans get along just fine before cable? I seem to remember growing up in the 80s, and there were plenty of Mets and Yankees and Giants and Jets fans around here.

      Is this just a case of there now being more available to fans than ever before, so nobody would ever want to go back?

    12. Re:Sports over Internet? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      That is why they have gone "full retard" in those organizations. They are holding on the ability to restrict the enjoyment of their content geographically. How well has that *really* worked for DVD? Yep.. not at all.

      I am certainly not into sports, but I have more than one friend ask me to find a game for him because we were blocked from watching it by the "suits" for god knows what reason that day.

      So they may have made extremely complex, and the lawsuits regarding large televisions being allowed to show it (churches, sports bars, etc.), but *all* of that is getting ready to disappear.

      When the majority of their potential market base leaves Cable Television and Satellite, and even broadcast TV they will have no choice but to embrace a system much like you are speaking of.

      However, get ready for the real fun. Trying to geographically authorize content in a multicasting infrastructure on the Internet is going to be extraordinarily difficult and expensive. Unless they start embedding GPS into specially built "sports boxes" like you suggest.

      Regardless of what they do, sports watchers are some fanatical people for the most part. I expect a technology war to ensue to remove by force those geographic restrictions.

      I would suggest they just give up and start selling their content online like everyone else instead of trying to control it so damn much, but since when has common sense and acceptance of the inevitable been present in any one of those media companies?

      Seriously ESPN, large yearly rate increases? Really? Enjoy as long as people are still being held hostage to bundled programming before the real revolution against you begins.

    13. Re:Sports over Internet? by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Can you get sports that way?

      Wrong site, jock. Now scram, before you get a specially-crafted wedgie!

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  37. No more cable-ready TV by boring,+tired · · Score: 1

    I'm considering dropping Comcast cable TV because they recently cut off clear-QAM service in my area. I use a Mac with TV tuner. I can still get local and broadcast channels but no more basic cable (Discovery, etc). Comcast doesn't have analog service anymore so it's no longer possible to watch cable channels without a cable box. CableCard doesn't seem to be an option on the Mac yet and the DRM worries me. Since then I've been relying more on Netflix, Hulu, and torrents. My computer is a Mac Pro tower, The software I'm using is EyeTV, Plex, and Front Row. It's really a kick-ass setup. I have a HDHomerun tuner and I plan to hook it up to an antenna soon. I still have a cable box for a TV in another room but I'm considering replacing that with a Mac Mini or Apple TV.

  38. Why do companies do this to themselves? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been trying to explain this to my girlfriend for a while, I have a good grasp but can't explain in a way that makes sense, so if someone else can help I'd appreciate it.

    Cable companies suck, they know they suck. Wouldn't they try to build customers by giving decent service? I understand the idea of cutting costs, but if a service person has to come out anyway you're not saving anything by scheduling poorly. You have a list of service calls for the day, an estimated time to fix each, and a truck with just about everything the guy will need.

    Simple scheduling where you arrange the visits in a reasonabl order (going out of town or coming in, not going back and forth) should be able to give you a 2 hour window maximum, without the 30 minute +/- on the outside. Even if you have to get a confirmation from the national service hotline and then an actual schedule from the local office, this is very basic stuff. You're sending someone out, you're scheduling a number of hours for the guy to work, this is known in advance. If the guy finishes a call early, moves on the the next house early, and the customer isn't there, you're actually costing real money by visiting and then having to re-schedule. From a business perspective, I would want to minimize costs by making sure the visits happen, and if one of the guys has a large number of "person not home" visits, I'd start putting a GPS recorder in the van.

    So why did it get to this point? What business driver is there to make people wait and take off time and re-schedule? It's been a joke for years, enough that by the time of the Seinfeld episode everyone just nodded and said yep I know what you mean. Even if they haven't had to wait they've heard stories because their coworkers had to be off.

    In other words, why would the business sabotage itself in this manner, in a way that doesn't give them any advantage? Obviously choosing the right people to hire is important, as is making sure they do what they are supposed to - but this is part of any job, any industry where you can't stand right over the people and watch over their shoulder. Normally, the CEO makes decisions for the short term so they can exercise their stock options and then cash out, but this isn't even a short-term strategy. This is intentionally running the business into the ground.

    From the free market perspective, most people haven't had options and are only just now beginning to be able to switch to something else. So is it just apathy due to knowing they have the only option available for most people? If so, why wouldn't you future-proof your customers by treating them correctly? How does this help your business?

    1. Re:Why do companies do this to themselves? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help your business.

      What you are seeing is not the result of a number of clearly made business decisions. What you are seeing is the result of a business which is being mismanaged from the top down.

      Let me give you a very rough rule of thumb. It doesn't account for the entire organisation, but by and large, the easier a company is to work with (as a consumer, a business client, partner or whatever), the easier they are to work for (as an employee). This cuts both ways - a company where the staff are royally shat upon day after day will sooner or later find that their staff don't really care about their customers.

      When you're a very large company (or you occupy a very strong position in the market), you can afford to let this happen for some time before it seriously affects your bottom line. Which means that if you're fairly disconnected from the grassroots end of the business (as rather a lot of CEOs are - I guarantee you that no cable CEO has been kept waiting for a technician to show up), you wouldn't necessarily know there was anything wrong. It's only when you find your position weakening (generally because there's suddenly much more competition in the market) that customers start leaving in droves. Now you either figure out what the hell is wrong and fix it (as is happening here) or sooner rather than later you'll find you've got a nationwide infrastructure but nothing like the number of customers such an infrastructure needs to operate.

    2. Re:Why do companies do this to themselves? by tibit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because most businesses have specialized in making money as their sole raison-d-etre. Everything else is outside of their "core competences", and is really a cost they would rather avoid. If they can get away with it, noone at the helm cares whether it's "nice" or not. They have customers while being an ass? They will just become a fatter ass.

      There used to be time where big businesses would be good at something, and *that* was making them money. Then they started optimizing everything to make money, not on whatever the "something" was that used to be good. This happened everywhere.

      Prime example: banks. Used to make boatloads of money from taking deposits and lending out part of that. Now the govt is trying to regulate some trading that become very profitable to the banks, and the banks scream bloody murder. Greedy optimization misses opportunities, but of course bankers are not computer scientists and wouldn't know that...

      Some businesses shield you from their mediocricity: for example car companies. You really wouldn't want to be buying your car directly from Ford or GM. It'd be a horrible experience. The car dealers -- comparatively small enterprises -- are the customer's last line of defense in making car companies do a relatively good job.

      Some car companies used to be good at making cars. They slowly became banks, and make their money lending money. The car making part of the operation is often the loss leader.

      The problem is that the business people's mentality, that gets implanted right there in the business schools, is that the money making aspect is the thing that should drive everything else. You get idiot business school grads who expect that they should be paid $100k/year for doing nothing much, with zero experience. Eventually the yes-sayers who are clueless but "problem-free" end up in middle management, and their ineptness drives the bad service, and eventually the upper management blames the poor results on "environmental" factors: competition, bad economic situation, societal changes in the neighborhoods, etc.

      No one in cable company division management typically has any clue about the technical side of the business, and none of the decisions they make actually help with the quality of service. The "technical" people and their managers are disinterested, since the people higher up don't give shit. The contractors, who often provide the actual technical service, are directed by same money-, erm, results-oriented monkeys -- but of course the cable company thinks they are clever by offloading the "technicalities" that are not their "core competency". It's batshit insane.

      It's this self-nurturing disease, and solid competition is the only way to fix it. Bad cable companies must be driven out of business, and their upper management should be publicly ridiculed for what they are: overpaid idiots who have zero clue.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:Why do companies do this to themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a list of service calls for the day, an estimated time to fix each, and a truck with just about everything the guy will need.

      I worked as a cable guy for a couple of years for the big C. When we arrived at the office, we would have a route printed up for us. Each type of call was assigned a certain number of points, which represented the average time the call took to complete. We had a quota of X number of points in a day that we were expected to complete. A trouble call was scheduled roughly 45 minutes of points. These could range from the elderly couple who set their channel to 4 instead of 3 ("The cable is out!"), to a squirrel chewed aerial drop which ran 120' over a 2-lane road and through six sets of trees - you can't patch that, you have to replace it because the drop is under tension. Suffice it to say, one of those aerial drop calls could throw the rest of your day out of whack when it takes 3 hours to complete. Sometimes you could get another tech to pick up some of your other jobs, sometimes you couldn't. If the flu was going around and 4 techs were out that day, well sucks to be your afternoon customers who are going to have a tech 2 hours late..

      The plant I worked at now has dynamic routing, you don't have a set route but pick up jobs on the fly. I'm sure that helps a bit, but some of it is just policies being set by guys who haven't been in the field for too long. While an average trouble call back in the day might not have been that bad, when you're trying to trouble shoot phone/cable/internet installs the time can go up tremendously.

      Now add dishonest customers to the mix - someone schedules an install with 5 'pre-wired' outlets. You show up to find 1 wired outlet, and now have to wire up 4 other rooms throughout the house. A 1 hour job on paper just became a 2 and a half hour job.

      And people who don't understand. House run with unshielded coax for satellite -, well, cable needs to have shielded coax. It goes on and on. I could write for hours about shoddy contractor work.

    4. Re:Why do companies do this to themselves? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      For the most part, cable companies use subcontractors to perform the work (saves the company a lot in staffing, employment taxes, stocking parts, etc). The subcontractors are frequently single-man owner/operator shops. The cable co couldn't schedule things better even if they wanted to, because they don't have direct control over dispatch and what happens in the field.

      It's a similar issue to how tow truck operators work. You call AAA and they dispatch a truck, but the truck isn't owned by AAA, it's a regionally subcontracted independent operator. Granted, AAA has a business model based entirely on quality service, so if they get complaints, they'll drop the tow truck operator. As you mentioned in the conclusion you came to, the cable companies are not focused at all on the quality of customer service because of their monopoly privileges.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    5. Re:Why do companies do this to themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If so, why wouldn't you future-proof your customers by treating them correctly? "

      Because it's cheaper and more profitable now. And, up until recently (last 5 years or so), there was no real competition in terms of programming and customer service. Also means the company doesn't have nearly the right mix of short and long-term focus, indicating more fundamental issues with their corporate governance.

  39. Line fee by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    We're talking about cable television, not cable internet.

    Except you can't get cable internet without cable television unless you pay a "line fee" that in some cases equals the price of lifeline cable television.

  40. It's funny how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a competitive marketplace forces industries to consider treating their customers like humans....

  41. AT&T is worse than Comcast (at least around he by dannydawg5 · · Score: 1

    I had a very bad experience with AT&T DSL.

    They botched the installation and then charged me $100 to come back and fix it. Several weekends ago, when my DSL died for a solid 2 days, I couldn't get a hold of a human because they kept transferring me to offices that were *closed*, which would then just hang up on me forcing me to start the automated system from the beginning.

    When I finally did reach a human, they wanted to charge me again to come out and fix it. I cancelled my service the next day. During cancellation, when asked why, I said, "Because Comcast has better customer service." I don't think they understood the severity of that statement. I told them their customer service is so bad, I am switching to *COMCAST*: http://consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america. Comcast, the company that sent me a technician when I asked for cablecards, and I had to install the cablecards myself because the tech didn't know how to do it!

    AT&T mistreated me so badly that I am selling my iPhone 3GS just to switch to Verizon Wireless after my contract expires. Apple started me down that path by being annoying with developers started me down that path, but AT&T crossed the line for me.

    There is no hope where I live. My choice is AT&T or Comcast. It is truly a desperate situation.

  42. Directv kills comcast Chicago land in many ways by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Directv kills comcast Chicago land in many ways

    Like having a better price, more HD then comcast.

    also comcast Dta are a joke hear you can't get CSN + on them and you need to pay like $7 per tv to get a channle that used to be on analog cable not that long ago.

    Also why is fox movie channle and speed in the sports pack?

  43. Go away, you're not 21 by tepples · · Score: 1

    For everything else, there's either your friend's place or the sports bar.

    Which sucks if your friend is also switching to Internet VOD and you have under-21 sports fans in your household.

  44. You'd be doing the under-21s a favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which sucks if your friend is also switching to Internet VOD and you have under-21 sports fans in your household.

    Fuck 'em. They should be doing something more intelligent with their time, like reading War and Peace.

    Or go outside and throw the ball around themselves. Commercial sports are for mindless peasants.

  45. I'd consider switching to FIOS except by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    Have you ever tried to use Verizon's web page to tell you if FIOS TV is in your area? Everytime I do it tells me the page isn't working and that I need to call a rep to find out. (It's actually more annoying because they actually have a store for FIOS TV in my town but I don't think they have it as a service. Of course I can't be sure since they won't let me check. Yes, I know there are other web sites that have lists but those can be a bit out of date.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:I'd consider switching to FIOS except by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      When I got FiOS I looked up my apartment in their system, found it was not available. Except I could see it running to my building to the other person who had it next door. After a call, they put my apartment in their system and said they'd call me when their technicians could see if it was available. Two weeks later I called again and finally got them to send a guy out to actually put the box in so I had Internet (he was amazed when I managed to configure the router he plugged in with my iPod before his laptop booted).

      Even with those problems, the tech guy showed up within a one hour window, and the services has been great since then. I called up their support line with a billing question once and got someone who knew exactly what to do on the first try.

  46. Comcast sucks it so hard they make AT&T look g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While living in my last apartment I had SpeakEasy DSL which was my only connection to the outside world, because of some weird local (Houston) ordinance that parceled out cable service monopolies to multi-tenant buildings to a handful of local cableco's who survived entirely on gouging apartment customers and didn't even bother advertising their service to people with a choice (house dwellers). If I wanted TV type entertainment torrents and usenet downloads served my needs just fine, would be even easier today with Hulu, Netflix instant and Amazon VOD but I digress.

    After renting a house and moving in with my GF we had to cancel SpeakEasy because we were too far from the CO and ended up on Time Warner. At the time their service was actually really good overall. The tech showed up in the middle of this four hour window and we were online within an hour. Couple times we had problems they were cleared up pretty quick. Internet service was almost as good as SpeakEasy, speed was fine, reliability was a little better but no static IP options and the uplink speed was too slow for running a server. Overall though life was good in cable tv land. Then they did that weird switcheroo with Comcast and it all went to hell. Within about a year everything started to go to crap. TV service got worse when comcast "upgraded" to their branded interactive guide service which was slow as hell to update, put in a worse and more expensive VOD feature. Internet stayed OK at first but then we had a really bad month when we were out for over a week due to a botched network upgrade on their end. They wouldn't admit that it was a network wide problem though and didn't mention a big outage on their telephone support line voicemail system but hold times were so bad they were rolling the tech support queue over to accounting (WTF?!) after an hour just to get a live person on the line which was worse because they had no information and no ability to help.

    What finally pushed me over the edge was maybe a month after the huge outage when internet service crapped out again. Ten minutes of poking around on my part and I realized our modem had just lost it's provisioning because we had a solid connection but our IP had changed network routing was restricted to a private IP pool. Plugged a laptop directly into the modem and found too that DNS was being hijacked to a webapp for the installer to use to provision the modem. Should be an easy fix for phone support. First I spent an hour on the phone with a tech that not only ran though the while reboot and check that your cables are plugged in bullshit but also suggested I upgrade flash if I was having problems with internet video. After that she told me she would open a case with a higher support team. She gave me a case number and told me I'd be contacted within three days. On the fourth day of no service and no callback I got on the phone again and when I finally got through was told no such case number existed and was in fact in the wrong format for their ticketing system to begin with.

    After screaming for a minute and going through the same scripted bullshit I was finally given to tier two support. She was more helpful but insisted on trying her own thing and kept assuming the problem was on my end. Every ten minutes of not making progress I'd beg her to reprovision the fucking modem but she kept insisting there was no record of my modem being moved into unprovisioned space. After a solid hour she setup a conference call with a network engineer and then fucked up the three way call and disconnected all of us. Per normal crappy tech support farms she had no direct call back number and had no ability to call out on her line. So back in the queue I went. Finally I got a support goober that just did what I told her and had her boss reprovision the modem - big surprise that solved all my problems.

    Shortly after that we got a flier annoucing that AT&T was rolling out U-Verse service to our neighborhood and we signed up within the first week of availability. Tech came out on time and

  47. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy by tepples · · Score: 1

    Fuck 'em.

    Ewww.

    They should be doing something more intelligent with their time, like reading War and Peace.

    Perhaps they already did read a similarly long book (The Lord of the Rings) by a nearby author (Tolkien). All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

    Or go outside and throw the ball around themselves.

    In a thunderstorm? Hardly.

    1. Re:All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      In a thunderstorm? Hardly.

      Well, that would probably solve the under-21 problem.

    2. Re:All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      That's true. A bolt of lightning WAS able to send the DeLorean 30 years into the future. But then they'd be able to tell you the outcomes of all the sports games before you even watch - you'd never enjoy sports again. And then they'd build a multi-trillion dollar empire on their sports knowledge and turn the world to shit.

      Oh, wait, you were talking about them dying? Monster!

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  48. I'll give you $100 to switch to DirecTV by drumcat · · Score: 1

    For anyone not sure, DirecTV is absolutely superior to Comcast for TV. I'm continuing to use them for internet for now, since they're the best option where I live, but the TV product is MILES ahead of Comcrap. If anyone would like a $100 off referral, give me a shout. They have a program, and it's worth $100 bill credit for you and me. They don't make it terribly public, but once you're in, you'll see that commercial. mat(at)cityofrain-com

  49. Comcast can suck it by jburroug · · Score: 5, Informative

    While living in my last apartment I had SpeakEasy DSL which was my only connection to the outside world, because of some weird local (Houston) ordinance that parceled out cable service monopolies to multi-tenant buildings to a handful of local cableco's who survived entirely on gouging apartment customers and didn't even bother advertising their service to people with a choice (house dwellers). If I wanted TV type entertainment torrents and usenet downloads served my needs just fine, would be even easier today with Hulu, Netflix instant and Amazon VOD but I digress.

    After renting a house and moving in with my GF we had to cancel SpeakEasy because we were too far from the CO and ended up on Time Warner. At the time their service was actually really good overall. The tech showed up in the middle of this four hour window and we were online within an hour. Couple times we had problems they were cleared up pretty quick. Internet service was almost as good as SpeakEasy, speed was fine, reliability was a little better but no static IP options and the uplink speed was too slow for running a server. Overall though life was good in cable tv land. Then they did that weird switcheroo with Comcast and it all went to hell. Within about a year everything started to go to crap. TV service got worse when comcast "upgraded" to their branded interactive guide service which was slow as hell to update, put in a worse and more expensive VOD feature. Internet stayed OK at first but then we had a really bad month when we were out for over a week due to a botched network upgrade on their end. They wouldn't admit that it was a network wide problem though and didn't mention a big outage on their telephone support line voicemail system but hold times were so bad they were rolling the tech support queue over to accounting (WTF?!) after an hour just to get a live person on the line which was worse because they had no information and no ability to help.

    What finally pushed me over the edge was maybe a month after the huge outage when internet service crapped out again. Ten minutes of poking around on my part and I realized our modem had just lost it's provisioning because we had a solid connection but our IP had changed network routing was restricted to a private IP pool. Plugged a laptop directly into the modem and found too that DNS was being hijacked to a webapp for the installer to use to provision the modem. Should be an easy fix for phone support. First I spent an hour on the phone with a tech that not only ran though the while reboot and check that your cables are plugged in bullshit but also suggested I upgrade flash if I was having problems with internet video. After that she told me she would open a case with a higher support team. She gave me a case number and told me I'd be contacted within three days. On the fourth day of no service and no callback I got on the phone again and when I finally got through was told no such case number existed and was in fact in the wrong format for their ticketing system to begin with.

    After screaming for a minute and going through the same scripted bullshit I was finally given to tier two support. She was more helpful but insisted on trying her own thing and kept assuming the problem was on my end. Every ten minutes of not making progress I'd beg her to reprovision the fucking modem but she kept insisting there was no record of my modem being moved into unprovisioned space. After a solid hour she setup a conference call with a network engineer and then fucked up the three way call and disconnected all of us. Per normal crappy tech support farms she had no direct call back number and had no ability to call out on her line. So back in the queue I went. Finally I got a support goober that just did what I told her and had her boss reprovision the modem - big surprise that solved all my problems.

    Shortly after that we got a flier annoucing that AT&T was rolling out U-Verse service to our neighborhood and we signed up within the first week of availability. Tech came out on time and

    --
    "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    1. Re:Comcast can suck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dumped Comcast for all the above reasons-crappy service, billing mistakes, service reps lying to me. I now do Netflix and watch some shows online and love it. Up yours Comcrap! Their ineptitude is saving me nearly $80/month.

    2. Re:Comcast can suck it by toxicity69 · · Score: 1

      NO kidding bro. They have FIOS up in Dallas, 25 megabits/second for about $60/month, but the fastest you can get in Houston is Comcrap's 16 meg service (over $100/month). Also, just received a letter in the mail a few days ago from AT&T talking about "Get Uverse internet and get 12mbps!" Great, sign me up! "Ok, $150 installation fee." Thought about it for awhile, still wanted faster speed, so went ahead. "Ok, now we need a credit card. No, we aren't charging anything to it now, but we need it just in case. Debit cards won't work, only credit cards." Fuck that. Stupid fucking ISPs just don't know how to do business anymore.

    3. Re:Comcast can suck it by jburroug · · Score: 1

      Since we signed up so early in their Houston rollout AT&T was still doing a free install, so we lucked out there. But I can understand the $150 setup fee, at least if you're in an older house/neighborhood. Like I mentioned our installer was over for a good four hours mapping out the cabling in the house and setting up the home runs we needed where we wanted the equipment.

      Overall the U-Verse group has been great to work with, but YMMV.

      Cheers,

      Josh

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    4. Re:Comcast can suck it by adolf · · Score: 1

      I don't want to stand up for the phone company, here (or anywhere else). I really, really don't -- especially not one with a Deathstar for a logo.

      But I'm quite certain that installing U-Verse at my house, and making it work, cost AT&T a lot more than $150. (Note, however: IIRC, instead of me paying $150 to install, at the time, they paid ME to have them install it. I forget if it was a rebate or a credit or what, but that's how it went.)

      We're pretty far from the VRAD, very nearly completely out-of-spec, so we (expectedly) had line issues. They easily had 10 man hours involved in the initial install to make it work. They replaced the drop to the house, replaced the line to my patch panel, and did whatever else they did that day. At one point, the driveway was stuffed full of AT&T trucks, driven by people who were motivated to make it work.

      And, lo, it did work. And it was good. Except port 25 was blocked, so I had to call and get that fixed, which was very painless. (With U-Verse, you only get Tier-1 support script-readers if there aren't higher-level techs available to talk at that moment. Otherwise, chances are high that you'll talk to someone with a clue. I got someone with a clue straight away.)

      Things were good until it got hot out. On the warmer days in spring, and the hottest days of summer, it would drop. Completely. Sometimes, for hours. It seemed to have something to do with the angle of the sun, but then it'd also be out for periods when the sun was down.

      I troubleshot the shit out of it myself, using their gateway's built-in diagnostics and my own knowledge of grounding, EMI/RFI, and heat effects on electronics. So, I called tech support.

      And so began a long series of phone calls, unfortunately starting with the Tier-1 "let's go ahead and reboot your TV" support. Once transferred to tier 3, though, things turned better:

      Me: "This doesn't work when it's hot out."
      Them: "Yes, I think I see that trend. Can we send someone out to fix it tomorrow?"

      A very long story somewhat shorter: There were many calls to tech support, and they gave me their internal number for tier-3 so I wouldn't have to fuck with the chance of getting a Mexican script reader. Every single time a tech showed up, he gave me his business card, including a cell phone number. Every single time I called them, they tried to fix it (I watched, asked questions, and provided insight while trying not to cross the line into being a nosy, pesky customer). There was a lot of fail, but a whole lot of effort and good will, even on Sundays.

      When I called their billing department to get refunded for a complete month of service, they didn't have a problem with that, either. And they made a point of calling the local u-verse manager to make sure that things were moving along fine -- while I was on the phone.

      It turns out that the cables in my neighborhood are just very old. There's more than a thousand feet of ancient lead-sheathed cable between me and the VRAD, for instance. This, combined with my overall distance to the nearest VRAD, were complicit in making things difficult (and the intermittency of the problem certainly didn't help narrow it down).

      So, one of the techs finally stopped trying to fix pairs, and just started trying them one by one until he had improved numbers. It's the sledgehammer approach, but it worked, and for now at least, it's been rather stable for most of a year.

      In conclusion, I just want to say that I had a hell of a difficult time getting U-Verse to work properly at my house, but that their enduring efforts (and, eventually, very stable service) generated enough goodwill that I'd recommend them in a heartbeat.

      Which blows my fucking mind, since it's Ma Bell, but, feh. I'm experienced enough to know that the steps they took were the correct steps, and that solving intermittent problem on long lines is a motherfucker no matter what. Did it take a long time for them fix it? Yes. Was that reasonabl

  50. Flipped about 6 months back... by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

    Don't watch much TV, so I was well behind the curve when I finally spent on an HD flatscreen last fall. When I called up Comcast to find out what the upcharge for HD was, DirectTV was running a special. I now have an rooftop dish, HD DVR and SD box for the kids' room for about half what I was paying Comcast for two SD set-top boxes before. The "rain fade" issue has hit us exactly twice for under 5 minutes total since November. If AT&T would get me full 6 Mb service (just far enough from the CO they're only offering 3 Mb at my place) I'd tell Comcast off completely.

  51. Government bailout needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Please... They are probably working with the government for a bailout!

    I hate my cable company. I now receive HDTV from an antenna, although I do have internet through cable. As soon as a competitor comes to town, I'm switching.

  52. Line fee for Internet without TV by tepples · · Score: 1

    When "basic" cable costs $20 or more a month and is basically the same channel lineup you can get OTA, why the heck would you bother subscribing

    Because you'll be paying that $20 per month whether you like it or not. If you have Comcast High Speed Internet without Comcast TV, you get hit with a $17 per month line fee.

    1. Re:Line fee for Internet without TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, disgusting, I feel for you. AT&T's Uverse platform is nothing short of phenomenal, and they only charge $35/mo (including tax and fees) for 6mbit internet; decent wifi router (and gigabit switch if you ask nice) included. Anyone outside the range of their service is, sadly, living in the e-stoneage.

  53. Clearly nobody told the Comcast rep I talked to by davidannis · · Score: 1

    Just last week I called Comcast to drop the TV service (but retain net access) which I have not used in over two years; the cable is not even plugged into a television. First they put me on hold for a while, then made me verify my identity via their automated system, then again verbally when I finally got an agent. The agent argued that I shouldn't cancel because I was getting a discount based on having two services (though he failed to mention that I would be paying $4 a month to keep even the basic service once they raise the price on June 1st). When I insisted on dropping the service the agent, in an annoyed voice, said fine he'd disconnect it, but there was a fee to do so. When I told him that I thought that was ridiculous he began a debate. His justification "Comcast is just doing what any other company would do." "Perhaps any other company with an effective monopoly," I thought. A couple of weeks ago I called to change the credit card number for autopay. The agent I spoke to was not allowed to take a credit card number over the phone - I had to do that on their website. I didn't have my password but she couldn't help me with that because that was another department's job. In all simply changing the card number took two calls and half an hour. There is still plenty of room for improvement in customer service.

  54. Binging by JDHannan · · Score: 1

    Geez, maybe Microsoft's advertising is working, or maybe it was just the capitalization, but i actually read your signature as Bing-ing (like Googling)

    1. Re:Binging by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      but i actually read your signature as Bing-ing (like Googling)

      If you even saw the signature, then maybe you should check your viewing options. Sigs almost never offer anything germane to any discussion.

    2. Re:Binging by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Yes... that's the joke.

    3. Re:Binging by banda · · Score: 1

      If you even saw the signature, then maybe you should check your viewing options. Sigs almost never offer anything germane to any discussion.

      Mind if I quote that in my sig?

    4. Re:Binging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigs almost never offer anything germane to any discussion.

      What does this have to do with Germany?

    5. Re:Binging by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1

      Sigs almost never offer anything germane to any discussion.

      What does this have to do with Germany?

      Helloooooo.... nothing! Did you miss the part about "almost never offer anything germane"?? So it almost never has anything to do with Germany.

  55. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by Sandbags · · Score: 1

    Basic cable is $48 including a DVR (37 without it). ...but, I get 4 OTA channels reliably and FOX isn't one of them. Basic cable has 38 channels. I'd have to subsidize the lack of basic cable with a combination of Netflix, Hulu, and iTunes purchases to replace just a handful of the shows we actually care to watch other than news. If I deployed my own DVR (which is essentially required for me to be able to watch what i want that isn't broadcast between 9PM and 10PM on weeknights) my costs for OTA would actually exceed basic cable... I checked, did all the math, and came to that conclusion. in most places in this country, ditching your service provider simply isn't worth it. The hassle and costs outweigh the benefit of sticking with one.

    --
    There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  56. Virgin Media are much worse by Astatine · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rant mode on, but it's on topic.

    I live in the UK. I used to get cable internet service from Virgin Media (the only cable provider in the country, because they bought up all the others). I would *love* to have had the quality of service that you guys above are complaining about from Comcast et al.
    Understand that Virgin Media works great until it breaks. Up to 50Mbps wherever you are, low latency, dropouts rare. When it breaks though, getting it fixed is a nightmare. And it *will* break. They don't keep track of what models of modems they've given people; they never send existing customers new hardware to replace obsolete models; they change the wire protocols without notice; they push broken firmware updates.

    Tech support is outsourced to India. It's manned 24-7, but wait time is at least half an hour at all times. The "people" at the other end of that phone line are barely more sentient than M-x doctor. Diverge from their script, even the tiniest bit, and they'll tell you you're not supported and hang up on you. To get through their script, you must either lie to them or unplug every single piece of gear you have except for a Windows PC connected directly to your cable modem. You then spend half an hour having them tell you to unplug and re-plug all the connectors and reboot it five times. At the end of their script there's still a 50% chance that they'll tell you your PC must be broken and just hang up on you, rather than agree to do anything about it at all.

    If you're lucky, you'll get sent an "engineer". He won't have a 4 hour window of arrival -- oh no, it's all day, any time between 8am and 6pm, and his best trick is arriving at 9am THE FOLLOWING MORNING. When he arrives, he's woefully underprepared, with only about a third of the equipment he ought to have (he will complain about this). He will fiddle with your modem, attach a meter contraption to the cable, and possibly change the little widget they fit inline with the cable to make up for the signal strength being too high. If you're unlucky and this does not work, he'll spend a few minutes using *your* phone to ring someone and explain to them that he doesn't understand what's going on, he'll noncommittally say "they'll look into it", and he'll leave. If you want to chase up (and thence have a hope that they'll sort things out), it's back on the phone to India, but the goon at the other end doesn't seem to understand the concept of records -- so you're back to square one!

    Last year I was unlucky, and had a problem that was slightly non trivial. I counted. After three visits by these "engineers", SEVEN hours on the phone to India, one whole week waiting for second level support to ring back -- and they rang while I had something on the boil on the kitchen, I asked them to call me back in ten minutes, I never heard from them again -- they still had no idea what was wrong. After a month of no service despite constant chasing I rang the sales line, and cancelled, and told them precisely why. My call got escalated immediately, and the manager offered to send along one of the engineers who handle their much more expensive business service to take a look, but in a further two weeks' time; I cancelled my contract anyway, but accepted the engineer appointment since it was free.

    Seven weeks after my connection had originally broken, and one week after I had DSL fitted -- slow, but with real support (www.aaisp.net.uk -- they're very good) -- the proper engineer arrived, picked up my cable modem, fiddled with it for a couple of minutes, and said "yeah, there's a return path fault on the modem. I can replace it if you'd like." I spent some time staring at him open mouthed before I managed to explain to him why I wouldn't like him to do that. I think he was pretty shocked at the quality of service I'd received.

    Never, ever, ever use Virgin Media.

    1. Re:Virgin Media are much worse by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      I live in the UK. I used to get cable internet service from Virgin Media (the only cable provider in the country, because they bought up all the others). I would *love* to have had the quality of service that you guys above are complaining about from Comcast et al.
      Understand that Virgin Media works great until it breaks. Up to 50Mbps wherever you are, low latency, dropouts rare. When it breaks though, getting it fixed is a nightmare....

      From your horror story, the only difference I see in comparison to Comcast/Cox/Time Warner, is that you can get up to 50Mbps.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:Virgin Media are much worse by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      Dude yes, cancel first, ask questions later.

      Seems like everybody has a "retentions department" these days.  I consider the account cancellation number to be my personal tech support line.

      And everybody else should, too.  Fucking douchebags.

  57. Coincidentally... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    A door-to-door Comcast salesman (I kid you not) came up to me, clipboard in hand, as I was sanding a woodworking project in my driveway last Saturday. He wanted to know if I used Comcast. I told him that I did not, and why (the usual list of reasons, plus a couple of specials). He seemed shocked but, to his credit, undaunted as he continued to try and convince me what a mistake I had made in dumping his company's over-priced shitty service. Alas, it was hot and I was tired, so I mentioned that I needed to get back to work and invited him to leave. Otherwise, I'd have been happy to expound at length on the many reasons that Comcast will not likely get my business again anytime soon.

    So it's interesting to learn this morning that Comcast is doing something, albeit too little and far too late, about their practices that have driven customers away by the million. Good luck with that, Comcast.

  58. If you want "revenge" .. by Drathos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .. just ask The Hammer how it's done.

    Comcast's customer service is so bad they drove a 75 year old lady to taking a hammer to the local office.

    --
    End of line..
    1. Re:If you want "revenge" .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stood in the same line at the same office about a month before that happened. I totally understand why she came unglued.

  59. doing more?...Of the same by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

    Gee, what had Comcast done for me lately... Well for one they changed the name of their service to XFINITY, that doesn't seem to help me at all. Then because of the new "upgrades to [my] service" they REMOVED two of our favourite stations that we used to watch, and now they want US to "upgrade" to get those two stations back. That's a lot of "doing more" to me, not for me. Yes, I can see why they have such a low satisfaction rating.

  60. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

    Basic cable has lots of Shopping channels that you don't get over the air :)

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  61. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

    simple, that 100$ worth of DTV boxes wont pick up anything for more than random slideshows 10 miles outside of the city

    OTA was great, now it is worthless unless you live pretty close to the source

    heck I could not even get PBS when I lived in the city

    What kind of antenna did you have and where was it pointed? I live nearly in the middle of nowhere using a 30 year old yagi that came with the house and I get good reception about 50 miles from the station. There are utilities online that will give you the best possible direction to point your antenna, try one of those out.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  62. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    Get a decent antenna (any UHF one will work) and hide it in your attic. Point it in the general direction of most of the stations and run a coax line down to your TV. Get a signal booster (or antenna with built in booster) if you still have trouble. I can pick up stations 20-40 miles away very easily with this setup (for my basement TV) and the TV in the upstairs bedroom has the antenna just sitting right next to it and all channels come in great. Neither antenna I bought (one even with booster included) cost more than $20.

    In short, either you are a hundred miles from the station, you live in a mountainous area, or you are doing something wrong.

  63. Re:Golden Girls! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Your heart is true, you're a pal and a confidant .

    *facepalm* FTFY.

  64. Free no more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I got chapped a few years back when Comcast was in my backyard one day, "checking on the lines...".

    About a half hour later they knocked on my door, and asked if we had cable tv, and I said "No, just internet, we don't watch tv that much".

    He asked if I knew I could have been getting free cable tv that whole time, and(of course) I said "Really, you don't say..."

    So, the free cable tv was gone, so I had to sign up with Dish Network.

    1. Re:Free no more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get free cable again really easily...its just an issue of re attaching the coaxial cable. All they do is unplug it...

  65. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    How much more than $48 is it for a HD-grade DVR? And of those "basic" channels what is included that's not either 1) also OTA, 2) crap infomercials, or 3) crap government programming? In central Ohio, the answer to the first question is "at least $10 more" and the second question is "none". $80 a month, $50 a month, hell even $20 a month just isn't enough to interest me in anything on the basic channel lineup, even if it's delivered in HD.

  66. You are considered a consumer. Not a customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are considered a consumer. Not a customer. Therefore you have NO CHOICE but to buy their product or get it from their competitors. But as long as their competitors ALSO treat consumers bad, the company will get disgruntled users from their competitors.

    They do this because being shit to your customers is cheaper than being good to them and they can only handle so many customers, so they aren't really competing.

    Your only option is not to consume.

    But very few people will put up with that, they'd prefer to be assraped than give up their TV.

  67. No local baseball TV broadcasts by jjo · · Score: 1

    I'm happy that you could cut the cable. Unfortunately, as a baseball fan that's not an option for me. Local TV broadcasts of major league baseball are largely a thing of the past. MLB.tv offers out-of-market coverage via internet, but local teams are blacked-out in order to preserve the local cable monopoly. To see local major-league baseball on TV, you pretty much have to pay a cable bill or a satellite bill, or content yourself with a handful of nationally-televised games on broadcast.

  68. Lucky you by jjo · · Score: 1

    You're lucky. Now that the FIOS rollout has ended, if you don't have FIOS now you're not likely to have it for a very long time. For those of us in the FIOS dead zone, it's pretty much a choice between cable or satellite, and a lot of people can't get satellite due to line-of-sight issues.

  69. Is this news by mmalove · · Score: 1

    I haven't subbed cable since I moved out 7 years ago. As far as cable internet goes, it varies from place to place. In Virginia I had Comcast, even during my time their they changed a lot going from down once a month to maybe one outage/year. I've had roadrunner up here with similar quality. That's good, as I work from home and an unreliable internet is as much jeopardy as an unreliable car: too many absences is poor for anyone's future career.

    I have no interest in cable television/land line phones. I see it as an overpriced model to begin with, and completely overdone with advertisements. Spending 1/3 of your view time in commercials unless you also get TIVO, whereby you fast forward by commercials, is a pretty bad practice IMO. Similarly getting a landline that's then bombarded with robocalls till you sign on a DNC list, and even then gets bombed around election time because for some audacious reason they think they are above your election to not be called by a robot @ dinner time... yea. No thanks. You couldn't give me that service for free.

    --
    You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  70. We did not move to satellite & Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some cable customers just quit TV. It is still the TV Wasteland. Video industries are losing customers due to poor products, DRM, commercials, liberal news & other better forms of entertainment. We quit Cox 10 years ago, quit Dishnetwork 3 years ago & largely quit watching DVDs. TV stations in Houston TX broadcast free perfect views of TV wasteland that I do not watch. With 50+ DVDs still to watch, why look @ the wasteland?

  71. It's amazing what competition can do... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    FIOS came to my neighborhood a few years ago. For the last three years, I've made an annual phone call to Comcast:

    Hello, how can I help you?

    I'd like to cancel my service - your standard rates are higher than FIOS, so I'm switching.

    What can we do to keep you as a customer?

    Reduce my rates.

    I can offer you $33/month internet for 12 months.

    OK, I'll stay with you. Thanks!

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  72. It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once they get you subscribed at a low monthly rate, they'll just raise it again in a few months. It always pissed me off that we had to pay $60+ a month and the channels were still packed with garbage content and paid programming at night.

    I would love to see the cable industry collapse and all content be delivered from TV networks to viewers online.

    CBS has the right idea. I can go to their website right now and watch any episode of a number of their shows.

  73. what in the world... by eggbeater59 · · Score: 1

    "That impressed Steve Curtin of Denver, who tweeted about his Comcast Internet service conking out last spring BEFORE calling the cable company. A cable agent reached out to him and got him back online within half an hour." something seems amiss here... is this the new internet system that doesn't need cable, but instead works on hopes and dreams??

  74. Comcast by iammrjvo · · Score: 1

    I've never had a Comcast account. From what I know about the company and the experiences of friends and family, I will avoid that company at all cost.

    --
    Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
    1. Re:Comcast by bhlowe · · Score: 1

      Comcast is the best deal I know of in the SF Bay Area for cheap high speed access. I have business class comcast internet for my home office that just tested at 70Mbps down and 10Mbs upload. Sure beats paying for the copper equivalent. Fiber would be nice, but not available in my area.

  75. Cable companies are the same rubbish everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why is it that all the cable companies are so bad. Here in Switzerland we have something called Cablecom. They have got such a bad reputation that they were planning to change the company name at one stage:-) If there are any problems or disputes, these will go on for months and years - happened to all of my friends who made the mistake of signing up with them (happened to me as well). I wonder why anybody puts up with that.

  76. sucky DVRs by gov_coder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As far as I can tell; no TV service provider makes a DVR as awesome as my MythTV box. Once you've got automatic commercial skip -- you never want to go back. Naturally, this means I only get OTA local channels; but there just isn't enough decent programming on cable or satellite to take me away from automagic commercial skipping. For the few non-OTA shows I do want to watch (SCIFI stuff mostly) -- I use hulu. I've had this setup now for about 4 years and have saved a ton of dough.

    --
    Rob Enderle's excellent new book: Everything I needed to know about Computer Science I learned in Marketing School
    1. Re:sucky DVRs by Ummon · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you babbling about? I've been using MythTV with Comcast HDTV via Firewire and the commercial autoskip works great. I agree the content tends to be lacking but I'm stuck since Comcast is the only ISP who can get me decent speeds. I'm still pissed that I'm unable to get any thing other than cable Internet despite being located between two major tech hubs.

  77. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by budcub · · Score: 1

    My elderly mother still has OTA for her TV reception. The picture is pretty good now that its digital, but watching broadcast only TV is like torture. When I go to visit we mostly have it on PBS stations, because if you watch regular network TV, its nothing but pharmaceutical commercials. I feel like a doctor in training.

  78. maybe in the us, but not in canada... :-( by tmp31416 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you might think that with the arrival of "new competition" (bell getting into tv, various cable companies getting into residential phone, etc.) we might be able to get better deals & service... ...well, no. not a chance. rates & service still suck and are getting worse (bell canada offshoring customer service to india, etc.) in cable, telephone, cell phone, internet... etc.

    my best chance right now for "improved customer service" is to look into ota hdtv, but for now, "outlook hazy, better chance next time" (i live in the ottawa region, which sucks for ota hdtv).

    whilst people in the us complain tv / radio / cell phones, they don't know how good they have it compared to canada.

  79. From an insider by daveywest · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work for a small cable carrier with roughly 8,000 subscribers. Competing with Dish and Direct TV is a nightmare for the cable industry as a whole. Satellite providers are not regulated in the same way as cable providers despite offering the same product to the end user.

    Our area is roughly 40% retired old white people and 40% Hispanic. The FCC prohibits a cable carrier from offering a $20 package with just Spanish language channels like Dish Latino. Instead, we must first sell a customer a basic and an expanded basic package before allowing the customer to buy any kind of premium or special interest tier. When you throw in all the national networks that are only sold by the package to the cable company, we can't be competitive.

    For instance, we have a very small population that actually cares about MTV or VH1, but we can't offer Nick which is very popular without the first two. ESPN is one of the worst. Roughly $4 of your monthly cable bill goes straight to that one channel. But, to carry ESPN the cable company and eventually the customer are required to buy the other ESPN channels like ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews, etc. at $0.50-$1.00 each

    I'm not going to say cable companies are a misunderstood hero, but article in the OP barely scratches the surface of the issues.

    1. Re:From an insider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not an FCC requirement. All packages must include the basic tier (that is, local broadcast channels and public, educational, and governmental channels) but you do not have to include the expanded basic tier. This may, however, be an artifact of retransmission consent agreements you have with broadcasters. For instance, Disney is the parent company of ABC and ESPN. Your local ABC station (which may be owned and operated by the Disney Corporation or may be merely an affiliate) may put conditions on your contract to carry the local ABC station. In many cases, the contract requires the cable operator to carry ESPN on all packages except for the true basic tier. This is actually due to a lack of an FCC rule to the contrary, not because the FCC requires it. You also would be free to simply not carry ABC or agree to an alternate arrangement with ABC.

    2. Re:From an insider by harl · · Score: 1

      For instance, we have a very small population that actually cares about MTV or VH1, but we can't offer Nick which is very popular without the first two. ESPN is one of the worst. Roughly $4 of your monthly cable bill goes straight to that one channel. But, to carry ESPN the cable company and eventually the customer are required to buy the other ESPN channels like ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews, etc. at $0.50-$1.00 each

      Stop letting the content providers hold you hostage. Without you they have no customers.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    3. Re:From an insider by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      For instance, we have a very small population that actually cares about MTV or VH1, but we can't offer Nick which is very popular without the first two. ESPN is one of the worst. Roughly $4 of your monthly cable bill goes straight to that one channel. But, to carry ESPN the cable company and eventually the customer are required to buy the other ESPN channels like ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews, etc. at $0.50-$1.00 each

      You've just listed the reasons we don't buy ANY of the premium packages, and get only the basic channel set (the IP TV channels bundled with our internet service). Each of the premium packages has one or maybe two channels that might interest one or more family members. But each comes with a plethora of mediocre to repulsive channels, many of which which are almost as attractive as bubonic plague (Big Brother, EPSN, EuroSport and their ilk) but bolster the price asked for the package. But then, we're more internet freaks than couch potatoes. Others must have those preferences reversed, quite clearly.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:From an insider by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Your employeers are lying to you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. They forgot that customer service IS marketing. by sehlat · · Score: 1

    As near as I was ever able to determine, the cable companies have always been all about marketing, the art of inducing people to give you money for something.

    But they forgot the other part of marketing is customer service. Advertisements (Look at all the wonderful channels!) can get customers into your garden, but only good customer service can keep them there.

    Supreme excellence in the art of marketing is making people glad to give you money for something.

    As for me, I gave up cable over ten years ago when Comcast insisted that I had to buy a five channel bundle to get the one channel in that bundle I wanted to watch. Funny thing: with the internet, I've never missed them.

  81. all NFL games for your team are on free tv by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    all NFL games for your team are on free tv

    THE ESPN and NFL network games are on free tv for your team.

    1. Re:all NFL games for your team are on free tv by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      all NFL games for your local team are on free tv

      FTFY

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
  82. Less is More $ by BancBoy · · Score: 1

    You can get cable Internet and not pay for TV. I am, anyhow. True, I pay an extra $10/mo

    Don't you find it odd that you are paying an extra $10 per month to not receive a service?

    Kind of like going out to dinner and paying an extra $5 so that you don't have to eat dessert...

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
    1. Re:Less is More $ by JerkBoB · · Score: 1

      I'm not paying an extra $10/mo to not receive TV, I'm simply not saving $10/mo by bundling my internet access with a TV package.

      Internet (no bundle): $49.99/mo
      Total: $49.99/mo

      Internet (with TV bundle): $39.99/mo
      Basic TV package (+ taxes, fees, etc.): $35.00/mo
      Total: $74.99/mo

      So it's more like going out to dinner and not paying an extra $25 to receive "free" dessert included with purchase of a bunch of appetizers that I didn't want anyhow.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    2. Re:Less is More $ by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      So it's more like going out to dinner and not paying an extra $25 to receive "free" dessert included with purchase of a bunch of appetizers that I didn't want anyhow.

      Another satisfied Chili's customer!

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
  83. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by tweak13 · · Score: 1

    Get a decent antenna (any UHF one will work)

    Unless you're like me and have half of your local stations on VHF, including one way the hell down on channel 5. I'm not sure what inspired most of the stations here to return to their old VHF assignments, but it certainly hasn't increased their viewership among apartment dwellers. The higher frequency channels at 10 and 13 are generally watchable, but channel 5 is just gone. I can't even get a signal 20 miles away with a direct line of sight to the tower. (Yes, it really is direct, the towers are 2000' tall)

  84. Cable No More by scurker · · Score: 1

    I just recently dropped cable in favor of 20/2 internet service. After years of dealing with increasing costs and overpriced equipment enough was enough. With the savings I'm getting from dropping cable I can have a Netflix subscription and come out way ahead of where I was before. Everything else I stream online or can buy through iTunes, so cable companies will have to do a lot of sweet talking in order for me to return. The only big loss from having no cable will be college football - but some games are still on local channels, and the games that aren't I can go to a friends house or alternatively go to a sports bar.

  85. OTA HDTV is good enough by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    It's funny how many people don't realize that you can get an HDTV signal with a cheap antenna - and that, at least where I am, the over-the-air HDTV signal is (ahem) very nice. And it's free.

    Sure, I don't get 500 channels - but we all know that those 500 channels are really all either carrying the same content, or are really niche (the Black Jewish Food History channel, the American Country Lawn Mowing channel, reruns of Flip That House, the Chopping channel (for lumberjacks), etc.

    If there's nothing good over the air, there's always the internet. Or go walk the dogs, see other people, etc. No need for cable tv at all.

    1. Re:OTA HDTV is good enough by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Comcast is the only internet provider on my side of the mountains. Sigh.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:OTA HDTV is good enough by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      "It's funny how many people don't realize that you can get an HDTV signal with a cheap antenna"

      Reminds me of a friend who I visited for dinner a while ago.

      Whilst having a smoke in his backyard I noticed a near new TV aerial leaning against his shed.

      I asked why, and his story was funny as.

      He had bought a set top box and could not get it to work, his daughter suggested he needed a digital aerial. So he went out and bought one, and when he got home and assembled it discovered it was exactly the same as the one he already had.

      Of course there is no difference. (:

  86. A la carte programming by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    What ever happened to a la carte channel packages? I thought this was meant to finally be getting forced on the cable companies about 5 years ago?

    1. Re:A la carte programming by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      I wonder about this as well, since I recall reading those discussions here on /. with great enthusiasm. Did someone grease the right palms in Congress to make the "problem" go away or is it just an example of overhead-laden government taking way too long to get anything done?

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  87. Alternatives with responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    20+ years ago, my local service was a fly by night that had managed to browbeat several local governments into accepting a sole provider rider in the contract. To say they were bad qualifies as understatement of the civilization. This continued until the local power utility put in a system to monitor consumption and load. One of the techs for the power company ran a small TV repair shop on the side, and noticed that A) lines were going to almost every house in the county, and B) they had a buttload of bandwidth open. He convinced his boss that the co-op (yep, co-op. trust me, this comes in later) just needed to buy the head end and set top boxes and they could offer a new service...AT COST. The FBN raised holy hell, promising lawsuits and blocked access. Co-op lawyer, (a good one, dealt mostly in civil rights cases) replied, all the way to the state Supreme Court, that blocking over the air and FCC licensed satellite transmissions was illegal and you can't sue a government agency for supplying services and the co-op was a semi-government agency.

    Long story short, the FBN was out of business in about six years, the co-op still thrives, although rates have gone up (ya gotta pay programmers) and the big boys stay the hell away from that area. Service is great because co-op board members are elected every two years and want to keep their jobs.

  88. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

    I'll second that.

    I went through the stupid escalating cable pricing scam in the 1980s and vowed never to pay them another dime.

    Tried DirecTV satellite and it seemed to be better on the price hikes but after a few years I tired of the lack of a la carte and having to pay for a ton of unwanted channels just to get the few I wanted. Dishnetwork was not a whole lot better but I could get the channels I wanted with a cheaper package and they had some HD programming.

    But once OTA HDTV was rolled out by a significant number of the local channels I axed the dish and put a basic antennae in the attic. The reception, picture and audio are absolutely amazing. I have no idea why the OTA networks are not shouting this from the roof tops, they can compete directly with the cable and satellite providers as long as they bring the content.

    And on the programming, I love PBS. The journalism is actual real journalism not some one sided hyperbole laced shouting match from a crop of dunderheads. The science and nature programs are also far superior to the hoax that most of the History/Learning/Discovery channel have become. No more UFO abduction or Nostradamus 2012 end of the world programs aired as factual issues we should be concerned with.

    Yes, OTA HDTV absolutely rocks!

  89. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

    Actually, living too close to the transmitter can be a problem because ATSC is vulnerable to multipath reflections (aka "ghosting"), especially with older generation tuners. Proper aiming of your antenna is essential, and if it's outdoors, wind can knock it out of alignment over a few months. A signal attenuator may even help with your reception.

    However, channels 2-6 (low VHF) tend to be really bad for ATSC for other interference reasons too, and most stations have abandoned them with their final assignments. There's one in the next market area over, just at the edge of reception with a good antenna, that went from channel 2 to 5 that I can sometimes receive, but I couldn't even get a barely watchable picture back when it was still analog.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  90. Re:Golden Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT. HTH. HAND.

  91. My opinion. by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a cable provider. My satellite office did a damn good job of keeping stellar service customer noticed too. Because it was a large company, some of the other offices didn't try as hard, which kind of let to the company getting a bad rep. Really bad in some respects - because some agents were doing a horrible job in sales and support some didn't care, but most, I'd question their intelligence. I know I spoke with them and I knew why the customer wasn't happy with them.

    The problem with the 4 hour time frame is when we'd book an appointment we'd include wether or not the customer wanted additional outlets. Sure enough, because there was a small cost in having it installed, most people didn't choose it at the time of the call. The tech shows up. Instead of one outlet, the customer now wants 3 and two of these outlets are in difficult to install locations. Then again, it could be a new home and they have to find a way to route the cable to the chosen outlet location. The customer wants it NOW or they complain to manager or HQ. This isn't accounted for in the scheduling so they don't have the staffing to get the calls to the other customers. Could they better account for this? Probably.

    I've tried to call my local cable provider (different then one I worked for) to get service. The hold time for sales is horrendus. It takes over 2 hours most times to get an agent. A friend had cable hooked up and the terminal wouldn't work properly. He waited on hold about 3 hours each time he called just to speak with an agent. After a few calls, I gave up.

  92. Car dealers have huge political pull by jjo · · Score: 1

    You really wouldn't want to be buying your car directly from Ford or GM. It'd be a horrible experience. The car dealers -- comparatively small enterprises -- are the customer's last line of defense in making car companies do a relatively good job.

    In the US, car dealers have huge political influence, so dealers have been able to purchase state laws that make it illegal to buy cars directly from the manufacturer. It might be that customers would prefer the current system of car sales, but we may never know. I, for one, wouldn't mind being able to arrange a test drive and then order a new car all on the internet, and have it delivered to my door, without having to deal with some slick salesman at the local dealership.

    1. Re:Car dealers have huge political pull by tibit · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to haggle over the price, then I presume the salesman's role is limited to saying "sign here on the dotted line".
      That's no different from buying a car online methinks?

      I've got my current ride, and my wife's last two, on eBay, and I personally consider car dealerships to be necessary for keeping car companies in check. They are not good, IMHO, for anything besides new car sales. Used car purchases at dealerships of any sort are almost always a waste of money.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  93. Compition is a good thing by griffinme · · Score: 1

    Where we live we have the choice of WOW, Comcast and AT&T. We have WOW and have great service, techs that know what they are doing and paying only 2/3 what my friends that live in areas nearby that only have Comcast. A Comcast sales guy stopped by once. I looked over his deal and told him that he was more expensive then what we have now even with his limited time deal. He admitted that this area was tough and that Comcast offers deals here that they don't offer elsewhere.

    --
    Is he strong? Listen bud, He's got radioactive blood.
  94. No TV competition by Caez · · Score: 0

    The cable company is dumping all the small towns in our area. That leaves only DSL, WiMAX, 3G or WildBlue internet for our customers. Dish Network is a good TV provider and DirecTV being 2nd because they don't have locals over the dish. The main reason the cable companies were surviving was the internet.

    --
    http://www.mistersampo.com
  95. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by Macrat · · Score: 1

    When "basic" cable costs $20 or more a month and is basically the same channel lineup you can get OTA

    In San Jose, CA, all I can pick up OTA is the local PBS station. All the network stations transmit out of San Francisco and are out of range.

  96. Re:maybe in the us, but not in canada... :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no and the competition was recently regulated so it would not reduce the profit margin of bell and rogers.....
    my current unlimited 7 mbit 33$ plan was grandfathered in the new regulation but If i was to change provider, I would loose 2Mbit, and I would gain a 200gb cap and HAND HAVE TO PAY MORE.

    Thank you CTRC....

  97. Maximize Points of Failure by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I'm about fed up with my cable company's attempts to maximize the points of failure and minimize the fault tolerance for people who dare use their own DVRs. First it was a software "upgrade" to their cable boxes that effectively bars their control by TiVos. Now it's Switched Digital Video boxes that can fail to get the signal, will flag all analog programming as copy protected (including SD broadcast channels), and can silently stop working so that you fail to record even non-switched channels.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  98. I just can't relate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our little suburb, we have 2 cable companies. Cox, and Wide Open West. Cox is expensive.
    I have Wide Open West. For $79 a month, I get internet at 2MBps down, basic Cable TV (with
    lots of sports channels - which is important to me) and phone service. Their customer service
    is quite good. After 12 years with Wide Open West, I have no complaints. Everything works
    like it should, it's reliable, it's not over-priced, and they seem to really care about
    making customers happy.

    Disclaimer: Of course YMMV, and I'm not an employee of any of the companies mentioned.
    Just a satisfied customer of Wide Open West.

  99. Why I hate Comcast TV by stonetemple · · Score: 1

    I recently tried out Comcast cable TV in the bay area. The DVR they gave me is a horrible piece of crap. It would crash or freeze about once a day, and after rebooting it would take 20-30 minutes to reload the program data after a reboot. It would record the same episode over and over, even though it was set to new episodes only. The list goes on but those are the worst of it. I assumed I had a bad unit until I found this site: http://www.bernzilla.com/2008/03/08/the-joys-of-using-a-comcast-dvr/

    Turns out they have been giving this same awful DVR to customers FOR OVER TWO YEARS. They knew it sucked, but continue to give it out. When someone complains, they replace it with another of the same. That is seriously crappy service in my opinion. Luckily my place has just barely enough sky view for DirecTV. My fiance and I seriously wanted to smash the Comcast DVR with a hammer after a week.

    --
    --- Robert Strickland
  100. If only... by uncholowapo · · Score: 0

    Now only if Comcast can stop throttling my torrents, then I'd have complete customer satisfaction.

  101. The cable guys lack network management by Animats · · Score: 1

    A big problem with "cable TV" is that, even though the cable company has a box on the user's premises which they own and to which they can talk, they don't do network management that way. They're mostly still organized as if their systems were entirely one-way.

    For decades, telcos have checked out their wire systems using Automatic Line Insulation Test gear. This runs some test voltages down the line and checks for shorts, opens, leakage to ground, etc. (This usually happens around 4 AM, at the time of maximum humidity, and some cheap phones produce a "bell tap" ding when a DC spike is sent down the line to check the insulation.) The cable companies, on the other hand, started with a completely one-way outside plant, and no institutional history of network management. Even though newer cable gear is two-way, it's mostly a kludge on a one-way system. Cable companies don't have the concept of automatically monitoring every piece of outside plant. They wait for customer complaints.

    The newer cable hardware can at least talk to central control, but cable boxes don't seem to come with the kind of line quality monitoring that modern DSL interfaces do. It's not something that cable companies have demanded from cable box suppliers. Ask your cable company to read out your bit error rate and line levels remotely, and they'll say "Huh?"

  102. Go away minor by tepples · · Score: 1

    No, but you can watch at a sports bar.

    I addressed that in this comment.

    1. Re:Go away minor by mzs · · Score: 1

      I watched Winter Olympics ice hockey at Walmart with my kids. I was not the only one.

    2. Re:Go away minor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart with my kids. I was not the only one with that stupid whistling song stuck in my head forever.

  103. The best customer service... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

    Improving customer service is great, but the best customer service, like the best weapon, is the one you never have to use.

  104. Consumer's hatred by Sudheer_BV · · Score: 1

    I can understand the customer's sentiment.

    People are paying more to DTH providers for the same service the cable operators provide. DTH providers are riding on the consumer's hatred for the cable operators.

    --
    Sudheer Satyanarayana
    www.techchorus.net
  105. Mom! Dad! Don't touch it! by singingjim1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's EVIL!! I'm pretty sure I saw the word "Comcast" embossed on that piece of carbon-ized Evil at the end of Time Bandits. I do hate them so.

  106. Re:You can't get live sports online W/out blackout by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    So?

    (I know, I know. I'm in the minority of folks who don't watch sports. Before someone gets their panties in a knot, for me it's "So?")

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  107. Switched to Comcast from AT&T/Dish by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    Well, I recently switched to Comcast. DishTV was OK, and I liked their DVR, but the DSL and POTS from AT&T were ... not too good. Decaying old copper infrastructure that goes out or develops horrific noise at every rainstorm, and crumbling insulation on the wires at the junction boxes that flakes off and shorts out every time the technician touches it, and not fast enough to stream audio without constant "buffering" pauses. Streaming video? Ha! I've been waiting for years for AT&T to get around to providing UVerse in my neighborhood, but it doesn't look like it's ever going to happen.

    I really hated to go with Comcast. Really, really hated it. But the internet is very fast (I don't utorrent terabytes of movies, so the cap hasn't been an issue) and the voice quality of the phone is good. I save a good bit over Dish + DSL + POTS line, and it'll still be a bit less after the 6-month deal expires.

    If uVerse or FIOS is ever available here, I'll grab it in an instant. But I quit holding my breath; I was about to pass out.

    1. Re:Switched to Comcast from AT&T/Dish by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I forgot to add...

      I've called Comcast customer service a couple of times, and they've been reasonably helpful. But I really hate the "happy-chatty your-best-friend" script that they make the CSRs go through. It's probably part of their attempt to improve the reputation of their customer service. Crazy cat ladies might find it charming. I find it a waste of time.

  108. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    Are you sure it's using the actual VHF channel 5? DTV stations use "virtual channels" so if your TV says you are watching channel 5.1 it could very well be on frequency channel 42. Most stations jumped to higher frequency channels during the transition, only retaining their old numbers virtually.

  109. UPC in Europe is probably worse than Comcast by joost · · Score: 1

    Ooohh! Can I tell my story about the cable company?

    We've had basic cable from UPC (we're in Europe) for years and all of a sudden out of nowhere a courier shows up at the door with a cardboard box. We sign, unpack and in it is a digital set-top box from UPC. Had a big sticker on it stating "if you break this seal you agree to purchase digital TV from us, you decoder is in here". After my initial WTF we shoved the still sealed box in the guest room and thought nothing of it. Until after about a year I decided to check our bill for basic cable. Sure enough a fee for digital TV was added. I am not making this up! Called them at 45 cents /minute to bascially rant at them. Guy at the other end had a script for it, refunded the surcharge. Fuckers! Hated them with a passion ever since and switched to DVB-T as soon I could.

  110. Out-of-market games only! by jjo · · Score: 1

    If you pay for the official NHL internet feed, you get "out-of-market" games only. They won't sell you an internet feed of your local team for love or money. We know how the cable companies hate competition.

  111. Tech is relegated to 'novel' from 'standard' by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

    REALLY ... that's because TV was the only game in town. If you could get 1 or 10 million viewers watching online then you are talking (See Olympics online). If they don't change eventually they will be filed under "who gives a shit". People thought TV wouldn't take out radio! Gimmi a break! Imagine a show/sport that wouldn't switch to TV for whatever reason... Good luck staying alive! Think about sports on Radio before you reply. Would you ever listen to a football game on radio? Well once upon a time people couldn't picture (Irony intended) the change to TV. Like Henry Ford said: " If I had asked people what they had wanted , they would have said "Faster horses"".
      In some ways audio only broadcasts are great for sports, like you can drive while hearing the game. This shows the tech is relegated to 'novel' from 'standard' as is all old tech.
      See ya... I'm gonna write a book on a typewriter, listening to sports on my short wave radio while riding my horse!

  112. Superman is getting stinky! by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

    What about those fucking annoying , in show ads! Once while watching Small ville there was an ad for the next program on the bottom of the screen. There was also a transparent channel ID. While this was running they made a dancing pizza come across the bottom if the screen for a local pizza joint. During all this, Clark was putting a stick of old spice deodorant in his locker label to camera, the whole scene. Like he would wear that! It was so obvious to the point of distraction! From what I was distracted, I couldn't tell you because too much was going on! I wonder if superman could sweat ! Maybe he needed the deodorant to cover his weird alien smell. Maybe if superman gets stinky ... the whole earth dies! They could have a whole episode where the old spice saves earth! The sponsors would looove it!

    1. Re:Superman is getting stinky! by EdIII · · Score: 1

      That is *exactly* fucking why I never ever watch anything from the SyFy (fuck you it's SciFi you idiots) channel anymore.

      It made Stargate and Sanctuary completely unwatchable for me. I did not bother downloading the HD torrent either since it contained the same stupid shit. Hulu was marginally better, but the quality was super crappy. I was already used to HD.

      Congratulations SciFi. You removed at least 25% of the entire value (to me) of cable television with your actions and all incentive to pirate your content. You made it worthless content.

      I now wait for it to be release on DVD from Netflix and settle for DVD quality instead of HD.

      Complete morons.

    2. Re:Superman is getting stinky! by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting Eureka. They had a whole episode that went exactly as the GP proposed: antiperspirant saved the day when someone created a second sun.

      It was every bit as awful as anyone could imagine.

  113. Competition does wonders by anup_at_mac · · Score: 0

    I had been subscribing to Comcast's Digital Starter Package + Comcast's slowest and cheapest internet package and had been paying $92+fees+taxes every month. Once Verizon FIOS came to my apartment complex and after the following strongly worded email (reproduced in its entirety for your reading pleasure), that came down to $65+fees+taxes per month.

    To,
    Doreen Vigue,
    Vice President, Public Relations,
    Eastern Mass, New Hampshire and Maine.

    Rick Germano,
    Senior Vice President of Customer Operations.

    CC:
    Bob Sullivan,
    Journalist and NY-Times best selling author,
    Author of "Gotcha Capitalism"
    (Bob, I was in the middle of reading your book yesterday)

    CC:
    press@cnet.com

    Before I go into the details of why I'm sending out this email, please allow me get a few of the logistical things out of the way:

    Comcast Account number: ***
    Home/Service/Billing address: ***

    I have been a Comcast cable customer since Mar-2006 and a Comcast internet subscriber since Jan-2010. Apart from the perpetually lingering feeling of overpaying for the services that I subscribe to, I have not had any occasion to be seriously unhappy with the service. To be fair, the latter part could easily be attributed to the low expectations that I had to begin with.
    It was against this backdrop that a few weeks back, I received the joyful news of my apartment complex getting wired up for Verizon FIOS. Even though Verizon took almost 8 months (from start to finish) to achieve that feat, it was truly a moment of great thanksgiving and rejoicing. Comcast finally had competition! Almost immediately, I started getting phone calls from Verizon touting the virtues of FIOS and why I should switch. Each time, I nonchalantly brushed off their overtures mainly due to my complete aversion to sales pitches. I believe that I'm intelligent enough to make a decision for myself without being prodded by sales people who have only their interest in mind.
    This weekend I finally decided to find out for myself whether switching to FIOS was actually worth it and how much money I would save (or spend) in the process. I went to the FIOS availability webpage and entered my home address (mentioned at the beginning of this email). I had done that a few times last year and each time was disappointed to learn that the only option available was Verizon's "cutting-edge" DSL service. So this time, when the word "FIOS" flashed on the results screen, my joy knew no bounds. The cheapest option presented to me was this:

    Verizon FIOS TV Prime HD (with 40+ HD channels)
    -plus-
    Verizon FIOS Internet up to 15Mbps(Download)/5Mbps(Upload)
    with a two-year agreement plan,
    Monthly charges:
    Months 1-6 : $80.98 (excluding fees, taxes, etc)
    Months 7-24: $90.98 (excluding fees, taxes, etc)
    Monthly charge WITHOUT any lock-in contract : $100.98

    It would only be fair to mention what I'm currently paying Comcast each month and what I'm getting (or rather, not getting) for my money's worth:
    (Also see my most recent bill from Comcast attached to this email)

    Comcast Digital Starter Package (Xfinity TV)
    -plus-
    Comcast Economy Internet (Xfinity internet) 1Mbps(Download)/350Kbps(Upload) -> The internet speeds are NOT typos.
    Monthly charge (WITHOUT any contract): $92.05 (excluding fees, taxes, franchise-related cost, etc)

    I decided that I really had to call Comcast and confront them with this new reality. Not doing so would only question my sanity, intelligence and financial prudence. My first step was the "online-chat" feature with Comcast's customer service department. The reason why I prefer this to calling them is that I actually have a complete transcript of the conversation (attached to this email). I do believe that the customer service representative tried his best but was most likely not authorized to make changes to my cable+internet service. He gave me a 1-800 number and asked me call their "Customer Loyalty Department".

  114. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by Sandbags · · Score: 1

    HD is the same price as non-HD on TWC. DVR is $7 and was included in the $48 i quoted. On Sattelite (like I have) HD is $10 more, but basic service is actually $15 less for more channels, so it's a better deal still. I Pay 478 including taxes for 4 rooms of TV, all on DVR, 2 in HD, and I get 2 movie tiers and HD... All my discounts have expired, i was paying less. This also included in-home warranty on tall the equipment so i never pay for onsite service and replacement hardware is free if it breaks down.

    I have over 60 HD channels out of 200, of which, only 2 are available OTA in my area in HD. I only have 4 OTA channels at all, Fox and the WB are not one of them. Virtually none of the "crap" channels, or those that air infomercials large parts of the day, are in HD at all. Almost every channel in the "top 100" is in HD, including Comedy central, Toon, nick, noggin, Discovery, history, Spike, FX, SciFi, Food, the news and sports networks, and more. The basic tier is 120 channels... not 26 like it was years ago, and still is on some cable services, though for the bottom most "broadcast" tier on cable TWC only charges $24.95. (and $7 more for a DVR, though i agree, THAT package is poinless if you get all the AB-NBCS).

    Even if i could get 50% of the programs I prefer (which includes none of the reality TV stuff, not any "popular" programming or sitcoms, we rarely watch the alphabet channels at all, aside from a few good dramas,) the monthly cost of a DVR (tivo) including service for just 1 room works out to near $25 a month including the cost of the device and routine replacement. There's no discount for having more than 1 in the house, and I'm on my own for repairs after a year. 4 rooms, 2 in HD, all with DVR would cost me more than satellite does! even 2 HD tivos replaced every 3 years, and including the monthly fee is not much better than i pay today, and I'd only get 4 channels? ...and to get streaming TV on more than 1 PC or set-top, I;d need to bump my internet speed by more than the diference thats left. It is simply not yet a good enough deal without major saccrifice.

    This is not true everywhere, but it IS true here.

    --
    There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  115. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    I have no idea why the OTA networks are not shouting this from the roof tops, they can compete directly with the cable and satellite providers as long as they bring the content.

    They are the same channels. There is no competition between them, cable and satellite companies carry their channels as well.

  116. Hughesnet by phalcon352 · · Score: 1

    I've read several posts about how badly service was when dealing with cable companies etc. That's all a walk in the park. Try dealing with Hughesnet Satellite Internet.... I'd take the worst provider over Hughesnet ANY day. I won't go into the horror stories of trying to deal with them. There are hundreds of blog sites that do that quite nicely. So quit whining and be glad you don't have Hughesnet as your ONLY internet provider. LOL

  117. wondering if this was true???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say.... A friend of mine said if I gave my cable guy twenty bucks he'd hook me up with all the good stuff ;) ..... [insert Jim carry's response here]

  118. In droves? for satellite? and phone companies? by jabbathewocket · · Score: 1

    Sounds like whoever decided to post this story was irritated with his cable company? The simple facts are that there are NOT customers leaving cable for the phone OR sattelite companies.. satellite has the most absurd "quality" levels and interference that makes good old over the air antenna viewing look great by comparison, the phone companies have nothing more than trial balloons of service up (fios and uverse get alot of press but the footprint they are available in is .. trivial)

    people deal with phone companies because they have to for whatever reason not because they want to, and dish and directtv have absolutely horrible service, and even worse they treat their customers like criminals... the idea that anyone would switch to directtv willingly is comical.

    Of course this is slashdot and i suppose it was a slow news day.. still why is this even being commented on? *sigh*

  119. Twisting... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Twist the knife a bit more, will ya? :P

    OK, here goes. I'm in a rural part of an even more sparsely populated country (Finland). We've had fiber to the house with 100Mbit down and 10Mbit up for a couple of years. There are no caps, throttling, or other usage limits or surcharges on the service. Even so, we have not yet reached 1TiB usage in any single month (we've exceeded 500GiB once or twice, though).

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Twisting... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Why do you think people in other countries can't get that? I'm in the US and I can get that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Twisting... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      How much does it cost compared to say, an average office drone's monthly paycheck?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    3. Re:Twisting... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      How much does it cost compared to say, an average office drone's monthly paycheck?

      It costs 55euro/month around here. A similar service is a bit cheaper in Helsinki, of course.
      No idea what you mean by "office drone", or how much one would make (before or after taxes).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:Twisting... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      A secretary, for instance.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  120. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

    Oh no, someone on the internet is wrong... maybe!

    You really thought that someone who understands how multipath is a problem with ATSC might not understand virtual channels? Geez.

    Yes it's on 5, and its PSIP is 2.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  121. Re:Truth. OTA rocks by bigredpaul · · Score: 1

    I love my OTA HDTV broadcast - we haven't had cable since 2006, since we rarely watch TV anyway, so the OTA is good!

  122. We Dropped Satellite by pugugly · · Score: 1

    About 18 months ago - price was just too high, and the number of shows we knew we were going to miss to few (Daily Show and Colbert mostly, with scattered news, science fiction/cartoons, and science programs.)

    Since then HDTV has come online - we now get five PBS stations with not entirely overlapping programming - which takes care of News and Science programming (The *best* cable science shows are only on par with Nova and nature, and often nowhere near as accurate. And let's not even talk about comparing cable news with Newshour.). With the money I saved I have now bought an HDTV and put together a MythTV box to record the shows I like - and now I can watch the Daily Show over the internet on my living room TV.

    I wouldn't drop MythTV on someone not tech savvy (I actually had to reinstall Ubuntu because a plugin killed the frontend badly), but even so - versus something like $80/month for Satellite? So *very* much better.

    Pug

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  123. Too little, too late by Benfea · · Score: 1

    I gave up on cable a long time ago. Maybe if they offer me Internet service with better capless data rates than the competition for a lower price, I'll consider coming back.

    You know what I've discovered in the interim? I don't really need TV, and I can rent the good shows on disk, or watch them online. It's been quite liberating.