Slashdot Mirror


Might Shatner Boldly Lead Canada As Governor?

just fiddling around writes "Now that Michaëlle Jean is approaching the end of her customary five-year post as Governor General of Canada, the rumor mill has started on who Prime Minister Steven Harper will propose to the Queen in her stead. According to the CBC, the short list includes Captain Kirk, actor William Shatner. It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California."

318 comments

  1. IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You...pitted...us...againsteachother. You...wanted...me..todoyourbidding. You...want...me...tobeyourgovernor. Well...I...WON'T...DO...IT!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You...pitted...us...againsteachother. You...wanted...me..todoyourbidding. You...want...me...tobeyourgovernor. Well...I...WON'T...DO...IT!

      One of the funniest things I saw on the 'net recently was to describe that style of speaking as Shatneritis.

      But what is interesting is that Adam West used the same style of speech in the Batman TV series, (and according to Burt Ward did so in order to get more camera time on himself). Perhaps West and Shatner were twins separated at birth?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Q: What's Shatner's favorite french film festival?
      A: Caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannes!

    3. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by RDW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems that one of the jobs of the GG of Canada is periodically meeting the Aga Khan:

      http://archive.gg.ca/media/pho/index_e.asp?GalleryID=584

      http://www.akdn.org/photos_show.asp?Sid=47

      Now, how would Shatner handle this situation..?

    4. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was revealed quite some time ago that Shatner's "dramatic pauses" were due to him trying to remember his lines. Probably equally true for Adam West, though I don't really know.

    5. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's truly bizarre the levels that TV and film stars have gone to just to get more camera time (we're talking *epic* egos, here). IIRC, Shatner supposedly used to throw parties for the Star Trek writers on weekends just to get them to give him more lines. Most of the old Star Trek cast won't even talk to him anymore (with the exception of Nimoy).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by NoZart · · Score: 4, Funny

      most of the old star trek cast are dead you insensitive clod!

    7. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought part of that was from doing classical stage pieces, especially Shakespeare. No citations, though, so maybe that was Shatner trying to spin it earlier lol. :)

    8. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

      James Doohan even went so far as to put himself into a transporter loop to avoid talking to him.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    9. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well when you change jobs do you still talk to all the people in your old job, even the ones you kinda got along with...

      Probably not. The fact that Shatner isn't in much contact with the rest of the cast. Isn't so much that he is so hated by the cast, but more to the concept was they were never really much of friends anyway.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by JustOK · · Score: 0

      I would have thought it would have been a Canadian one. huh.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    11. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't sabatage the system!

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    12. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which shows the lengths they're prepared to go to...

    13. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by toriver · · Score: 1

      (Hum, she's called Khan but looks like Uhura... conflict!)

      *extends hand* - Denny Crane.

    14. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      The fact that Shatner isn't in much contact with the rest of the cast. Isn't so much that he is so hated by the cast, but more to the concept was they were never really much of friends anyway.

      Plus the fact that it's been more than 40 years since they were "the cast".

      I can't think of anyone I know other family that I've known that long (I can't even think of anyone that my parents have known that long other than family), much less that I've liked that long....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    15. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    16. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How DARE you insult the great ADAM WEST with such felonious insinuations!

      The long lost brother... of a CANADIAN?

      You've been guzzling too much syrup, hockey head.

    17. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shatner has said in interviews that this manner of speech came from having trouble remembering his lines on the short rehearsal schedule.

    18. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by ItGoesToEleven · · Score: 1

      TETSUOOOOOO!

    19. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by sexconker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which shows the lengths they're prepared to go to...

      Which shows the lengths to which they're prepared to go...

    20. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DennyCrain! CanadianOverlord!

    21. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, ST was a very low-budget show and they didn't have the money for retakes.

      Nevertheless, William Shatner has already turned down the idea. There was a FB group a while ago, and he contacted us to say that while he was flattered, he felt that he was not qualified to represent Canada in such a respected and honoured position.

      I would look it up, but FB is blocked at work.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    22. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by boxwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fun fact: that dude is actually a descendent of the original Assassins

    23. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam West has been mayor of Quahog for a while now. But it's not the same as Governor of Canadia.

    24. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which shows the lengths to which they're prepared to go...

      This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put...

    25. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? An actor who knows that years of appearing on televisions and movie screens don't qualify someone to run a state or a country?

      What's next? Search engine companies making cell ph.... Oh, wait nevermind.

    26. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      ... to boldly go ...

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    27. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the TNG cast is still pretty close.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    28. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect? It was the eighties. Men started to become more in tune with their feminine sides...

    29. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's next? Search engine companies making cell ph.... Oh, wait nevermind.

      I'm not sure how that follows. Software is a good part of what makes a good cell phone, and Google certainly has a lot of talented software engineers.

    30. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you listen to NPR alot (like I do), then you'll notice that liberals use this manner of speech as well. I'm not sure why they do it, but I think that they think it lends them more credibility by making them sound contemplative. I heard a linguistics expert describe this halting manner of speech as profoundly arrogant, though. His argument was that it smacks of self-importance, like a king delivering a proclamation that you should all stop and listen to with baited breath. I personally tend to agree with the linguistic analysis.

    31. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? An actor who knows that years of appearing on televisions and movie screens don't qualify someone to run a state or a country?

      Amazingly, his ability to recognize his limitations probably makes him more qualified than the vast majority of politicians for that role.

    32. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by pedrop357 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey you know that guy off in whose camper they were whacking?

    33. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Star Trek a low-budget show? No way. In fact, it was one of the highest-budget programs from that era. The matte paintings alone cost more than most contemporary show's entire budgets, including talent.

    34. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California."

      Ronald Reagan was from Illinois, and his acting career let to the US Presidency. So it's been like that for some time.

    35. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

      FWIW, my wife has an Evo 4G, and I'm getting one in the fall, when my contract is up.

    36. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by baegucb · · Score: 1

      And I'm still in contact with the person who first trained me 35 years ago. Ancedotal material doesn't count.

    37. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard a story from a fellow who was an extra on Steven Spielberg's War of the Worlds that Tom Cruise had a few choice words with Dakota Fanning over certain scenes where she would stand or walk between him and the camera for too many seconds at a time. Remember, she was a child just doing what her director told her to do. Cruise persuaded Spielberg to change the camera set up so the scene would play out the same way, but the figure of the little girl would never block any of Cruise's scenes. Talk about "epic" egos!

    38. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Dude, its female, and it has a pulse. No doubt The Shat would hit that. Didn't you ever watch the show? Hell even being green as goose shit was no deterrent for the libido of The Shat.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    39. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by colonelquesadilla · · Score: 1

      indeed, one might say lengths to which no man has gone before

      --
      It's either false dichotomies, or the terrorists win, you decide.
    40. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by colonelquesadilla · · Score: 1

      It also ran quite a bit longer, they were working together 7 years, instead of being canceled after 2.

      --
      It's either false dichotomies, or the terrorists win, you decide.
    41. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by colonelquesadilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      One could argue that his acting career led to his governorship of california, which led to his presidency.

      --
      It's either false dichotomies, or the terrorists win, you decide.
    42. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by nigelo · · Score: 1

      Caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanadian?

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    43. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a bad troll there. Try it on more political sites like reddit or fark.

    44. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Cruise strikes me as the kind of guy who is about two drinks away from being a serial-killing sociopath. Makes sense that a guy like that would feel right at home in Scientology.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    45. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how that follows. Software is a good part of what makes a good cell phone, and Google certainly has a lot of talented software engineers.

      Then again, acting is a big part of being a politician, so...

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    46. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Churchill. :)

    47. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Ronald Reagan was from Illinois

      But he was a Californian for his entire political career.

    48. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 1

      I like this post title, given that another name being tossed around is Leonard Cohen.

      --
      stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
    49. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by mikerubin · · Score: 1

      Genius, pure genius

      --
      I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    50. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Hey... Churchill! could you... SAVE... me money ON... my... governance?

      Anyway, less jaw-jaw, more work-work...

    51. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Yes, perhaps even the Stratford one.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    52. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      They are? Of the ones I remember - Kirk, Bones, Scotty, Spock, Uhura, Checkov and Sulu only 2 are dead (Scotty and Bones).

      Star trek fortune cookie:
      Wear not the red shirt and live a long and prosperous life.

    53. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "It was revealed quite some time ago that Shatner's "dramatic pauses" were due to him trying to remember his lines. "

      The story I heard was that, when he was doing the movie "Incubus" in esperanto, the pauses were an artifact of him speaking his lines from rote. At first he was very frustrated with the effect, but the directors actually liked the effect it had, so he kept doing it and it became his style.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    54. Re:IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      he felt that he was not qualified to represent Canada in such a respected and honoured position.

      One might argue that being able to recognize this makes him more qualified for the position than anyone else.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  2. As a Canadian by epiphani · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I say: fuck that noise.

    --
    .
    1. Re:As a Canadian by epiphani · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suppose I should qualify that statement. Everything I have read about William Shatner gives me the impression the man is a dick. If placed against someone (who has some reasonable buzz about him in this specific context) such as Romeo Dallaire, how does William Shatner measure up? This is no minor office - and the person who occupies it should be one of exceptional quality. Michelle Jean, my issues with her handling of Harper aside, was a person that could be looked up to for her journey through life and her efforts to support those less fortunate.

      What has William Shatner done to deserve this?

      As far as I'm concerned, he shouldn't even be mentioned among such people has Romeo Dallaire or Michelle Jean.

      --
      .
    2. Re:As a Canadian by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Aw come on, let's be brutally honest here - GG of any commonwealth country is a ceremonial position. Your job, such as it is, is to go around and do photo ops and shit like that. You're the Queen's representative, and she has no power or responsibilities, so Shatner will have even less.

      This is actually a pretty good choice. As a Canadian, I'm more than happy for Kirk to be the guy schmoozing on behalf of my country.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:As a Canadian by easterberry · · Score: 1

      I'd consider it a pretty minor office. The job of the GG is mostly ceremonial. It's lip service to the monarchy for the sake of tradition. If he or she ever actually said no to the PM on any of his requests there'd be a public uproar that s/he was overstepping their duties.

    4. Re:As a Canadian by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Informative

      You seem to forget that in Canada the GG has official duties which they're required to follow through for the operation of the country. Half of it is public junk the other half is government. Saying that the GG has no power or responsibilities, is the same as saying the PM doesn't lead his party, and isn't responsible for cabinet positions.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:As a Canadian by epiphani · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I'd like our purely ceremonial head of government to be taken seriously both at home and abroad.

      Oh, and the position is ceremonial - until it's not.

      --
      .
    6. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 0

      "Michelle Jean... was a person that could be looked up to for her journey through life and her efforts to support those less fortunate"

      By eating raw seal hearts? Yeah real classy.

    7. Re:As a Canadian by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Saying that the GG has no power or responsibilities, is the same as saying the PM doesn't lead his party, and isn't responsible for cabinet positions.

      No, you're being disingenuous. Yes, technically, the Queen (and by extension, her representatives, the GGs of commonwealth countries), holds all the power. But in reality, the GG is a messenger boy at best. If he or the Queen actually tried to exert their paper authority, it would start a constitutional crisis.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    8. Re:As a Canadian by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I'd like our purely ceremonial head of government to be taken seriously both at home and abroad.

      No comment.

      Oh, and the position is ceremonial - until it's not.

      ?????

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    9. Re:As a Canadian by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      Would you prefer Arnie?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    10. Re:As a Canadian by epiphani · · Score: 3, Informative

      Born in Haiti, her family fled the country when she was 11 after her father was arrested and tortured. For most of the 80s, she went to university and volunteered at womens shelters. She co-ordinated major studies on violence against women in domestic settings. She moved into journalism in the late 80s, winning several awards for her coverage. She speaks 5 languages fluently. She has started womens shelters across the country.

      What has William Fucking Shatner done?

      source

      --
      .
    11. Re:As a Canadian by m.ducharme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes and no. I've talked to a few constitutional scholars about this, and they seem to be of the opinion that the powers are still real, but probably can only be used once; if the GG pulls the trigger and tells the Premine Minister to bite it, or dissolves Parliament without a request, or something of that ilk, the Supreme Court would likely support her, and then the provincial and federal governments would all get together and amend the Constitution to prevent it from happening again. Whether the public would get into an uproar would have more to do with what the specific issue was. Many people in Canada still support the "monarchy" side of "constitutional monarchy" and would love to see the Prime Minister get his comeuppance from the Queen's Representative.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    12. Re:As a Canadian by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      So you think that it's not classy to show public support for an indigenous people, who are poor and marginalized, by sharing the food that they eat out of necessity?

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    13. Re:As a Canadian by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      This is actually a pretty good choice. As a Canadian, I'm more than happy for Kirk to be the guy schmoozing on behalf of my country.

      Seconded.

      Would I want him as a premier or worse yet prime minister? Hell no. However, having someone used to being in front of a camera and group speaking that is known throughout the world is exactly what you want for the role of GG.

      How many people in other countries know who Canada's current GovGen is? How about how many Canadians? I had to look it up (I got the last two mixed up somehow). Having Shatner as GG would ensure ALL canadians know who the current GG is and a lot of the world (well maybe they wouldn't know the role, but they would know he's some kind of a rep for Canada). Canada doesn't get a lot of worldly recognition. This could help.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    14. Re:As a Canadian by epiphani · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Alright, I'm going to take this in another direction. I've got more than enough karma to burn, and I haven't flamed someone in a while.

      I don't know about you, but I'd like our purely ceremonial head of government to be taken seriously both at home and abroad.
      No comment.

      No comment? What fucking world do you live in? Do you not realize that perception may as well be reality in politics? The Governor General acts as the head of the Canadian Government. She meets with heads of state all the fucking time. She may not have any official power, but she wields a massive amount of influence. Access is power.

      Get your head out of your ass. This appointment is not some minor office that nobody cares about. We are selecting someone to represent Canada to the world, and represent the Queen in this country. I expect that person to be one of the best of us. Do you honestly believe that William Shatner is one of the best of us?

      Your posts demonstrate the problem with democracy. William Shatner is being considered alongside a man who has been internationally recognized for trying to stop the genocide in Rwanda, and speaking out about it ever since.

      So I say to you, respectfully, go fuck yourself.

      On the "until its not" comment: it wasn't that long ago.

      --
      .
    15. Re:As a Canadian by easterberry · · Score: 4, Funny

      well yeah, I'm aware that the GG CAN exert power and I'll completely agree we all want to see Harper and the deceptiCons get theirs for some of the shit they've pulled. But like you said, it's a one shot thing and incredibly unlikely to ever happen for the reason of we LIKE the Queen. She's a classy dame and all that. Plus, we're the only good kid England has left. They kicked Australia out, the USA ran away to start a band and India just sat in its room refusing to eat until mom let him leave. I mean, sure, we may have married that french woman who's always going on about a divorce at all the family gatherings but we're still the good kid. The GG isn't likely ever going to USE that one shot any more than the Queen is to refuse to let a PM resign or accept a new one.

    16. Re:As a Canadian by Arivia · · Score: 1

      You mean the King-Byng Affair?

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    17. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you think it's purely ceremonial, look back to December of 2008 where, at the behest of under-fire PM Stephen Harper, agreed to prorogue (suspend) parliament until the end of January to avoid a confidence vote scheduled for the following Monday in which the government was widely expected to lose.

      http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/12/04/harper-jean.html

      "Monday's no-confidence vote could have precipitated the rise of a proposed Liberal-NDP coalition, supported by the Bloc Québécois, or could have resulted in another election, depending on the Governor General's response."

      It followed several recent events that reflected negatively on Harper's Tories, and would have at worst forced them out, and even the best case put them on the back foot going into an election campaign.

      Ceremonial my ass.

    18. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm right there with you. Shatner may have been born Canadian, but really, he's an American first. If he wants into politics, he should jump on the Governator's coat tails, IMO.

    19. Re:As a Canadian by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and the position is ceremonial - until it's not.

      ?????"

      I can help with that. A lot of jobs and positions are "ceremonial" - but when you search down through the paperwork, and all the dross, there really are resposibilities associated with the job.

      In a time of crisis, a powerful personality who exerts his will might change that ceremonial position into a real position of power.

      Of course, that is largely dependent on the people he has to interact with. If he's surrounded by a bunch of putzes with no clue to reality, he just walks over them. If he's surrounded by equally powerful personalities with their own missions in life, then he might still be restricted to the ceremonial part of his job.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    20. Re:As a Canadian by walshy007 · · Score: 1
      Governer-generals are there to solve these matters, not create them.

      Yes the role is ceremonial... until it's needed, sometimes that level of power is needed.

    21. Re:As a Canadian by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, you're being disingenuous.

      No you're being dense at not understanding how a parliamentry system works with a functioning GG, especially in Canada. More so in Canada because of the Charter, compared to other commonwealth countries.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    22. Re:As a Canadian by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Well that's what you'd think, unless the shit hits the constitutional fan, as it did in Australia in 1975. I think you want someone with serious backbone in the position.

    23. Re:As a Canadian by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      The recent proroguing of parliament in Canada, twice, has been very controversial and is one of the decisions actually made by the GG.

      There are a few other important ones, and while the job is ceremonial probably 90%+ of the time, those few occasions would lead one to want someone with at least a little concept of good governance.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    24. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact I do. It was a pointless and barbaric public stunt.

      Just because people are "indigenous" doesn't suddenly make them saints or angels or beyond reproach.

      How about enabling them to move into the real world? Education and the like? Set up a Panera Bread or something? Oh wait.. not newsworthy enough. Lets keep the "indigenous" where they are! Dependent on handouts and and always on display for a pitying public in the yearly photo ops.

    25. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. If she's been through all that and still is stupid enough to pull that seal heart stunt, yeah she deserves that epitaph.

      William Fucking Shatner at the very least inspired 2 or 3 generations of kids around the world to look at the stars and dream of achieving great things.

    26. Re:As a Canadian by BlueStraggler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, she alone has the power to summon and dissolve parliament, which is hardly ceremonial. She's basically the referee between rivals for the government, and considering that we have a minority government right now, and may soon have another, the referee's job is pretty significant. It only seems like there isn't much power there because the current minority has been pretty stable, and the previous majorities haven't needed much refereeing.

    27. Re:As a Canadian by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That was simply beautiful. Thank you very much indeed.

    28. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wretched, corrosive freedom! AURHG! IT BURNS!

    29. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governor General would be head of state; head of government is the prime minister.

    30. Re:As a Canadian by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0

      Alright, I'm going to take this in another direction. I've got more than enough karma to burn, and I haven't flamed someone in a while.

      Good for you, don't take no shit off nobody. (I'm not being sarcastic: one of the best things about slashdot is that the only censorship is self-censorship.)

      Our problem, such as it is, is one of perception. You're taking an archaic, ought-to-be-retired position waaaaay too seriously. For example:

      The Governor General acts as the head of the Canadian Government.

      The key word being 'acts'. There's no real power, so I don't know what your problem is here. Similarly:

      Access is power.

      Hmmm. And do you honestly believe anyone on the GG shortlist already doesn't have access to that kind of power already? Seems kind of a silly point.

      This appointment is not some minor office that nobody cares about.

      Yeah, it is. As another poster said, most Canadians don't know what or who the GG is. What you feel/think != what the majority of Canadians think.

      Do you honestly believe that William Shatner is one of the best of us?

      He's as good a candidate as most: Any working class kid who can successfully manage a 50+ year career in Hollywood is far from an idiot.

      Your posts demonstrate the problem with democracy.

      Ahhh, see, here's your problem. This has nothing whatsoever to do with Democracy: This is an appointed position. Glad I could clear that up for you.

      So I say to you, respectfully, go fuck yourself.

      Love you too.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    31. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no minor office - and the person who occupies it should be one of exceptional quality.

      Actually, it is a minor office. The Queen is Canada's head of state. As a constitutional monarchy, the monarch does virtually nothing of real significance.

      Since the Queen is a busy person, the Governor-General is the Queen's representative in Canada.

      The duties are minimal:

      - open parliament
      - read the speech that the prime minister writes for you (the speech from the throne)
      - be charming
      - donate to charity
      - be a patron of the arts
      - sign legislation passed by the House of Commons & Senate
      - dissolve parliament when asked by the prime minister

      That's about it. The last time a Governor-General tried to do something contrary to what the prime minister wanted, it was a major crisis.

      Ever since, the Governor-General (which is an unelected, unaccountable position) has done what the prime minister asked them to do.

      On paper, the Governor-General has great powers. In reality, they have none.

    32. Re:As a Canadian by gfreeman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ouch, my pedant gland is hurting.

      That plural would be "Governers General"

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    33. Re:As a Canadian by Syberz · · Score: 1

      As I Canadian I can honestly say that I do not give a rat's donkey about who is Governor General. Why? It's not because I don't care about politics, because I do, it's because the position's a useless waste of MY money.

      All of her tasks could easily be done by someone else. Meet and greets with heads of State? Foreign Minister. Give out the Order of Canada? Prime Minister. Decide whether or not to prorogue government? Let the useless Senators vote on it or have everyone in the Chamber vote on it. Wave a hand, wear a funny outfit and say: "Parliament is now in session"? The President or any other douchebag, the f*cking tour guide could do it.

      Seriously, this institution needs to be reduced to its useful components only. Use the spare cash to fix our healthcare and schools.

      --
      ~Syberz
    34. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Governor General acts as the head of the Canadian Government.

      Absolutely not.

      In a constitutional monarchy like Canada, the monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) is the head of state.

      The head of government is the prime minister (currently Stephen Harper).

      Since the monarch is very busy and rarely in Canada, the Governor-General is the representative of the monarch and exercises the powers of the monarch in their absence.

      The Governor-General is appointed by the monarch and answers to them.

      The monarch (and Governor-General) is NOT the head of government.

      And despite the claims by some (including the Governor-General on a couple occasions), the Governor-General is NOT Canada's head of state.

    35. Re:As a Canadian by Obyron · · Score: 1

      Actually it'd be Governors-General. Pedant gland indeed!

      --
      --Obyron
    36. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The recent proroguing of parliament in Canada, twice, has been very controversial and is one of the decisions actually made by the GG.

      Not really, it's mostly the bleating of the Liberals, socialists and separatists who are unhappy that they aren't getting their way.

      Despite being obscure, proroguing has been around a long time, and it has a long legal tradition & precedent behind it.

      Proroguing has never been news until Stephen Harper did it. For example, under Jean Chretien, proroguing was used a few times without the slightest criticism (to be honest, I'm active in politics, and I didn't even notice at the time).

    37. Re:As a Canadian by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Haha, you are right of course :D

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    38. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Born in Haiti, her family fled the country when she was 11 after her father was arrested and tortured. For most of the 80s, she went to university and volunteered at womens shelters. She co-ordinated major studies on violence against women in domestic settings. She moved into journalism in the late 80s, winning several awards for her coverage. She speaks 5 languages fluently. She has started womens shelters across the country.

      What has William Fucking Shatner done?

      Gotten over himself.

      No disrespect to the current GG - but she's the perfect stereotype of a Canadian. Smart as hell, but the rest of the story is a sob story. Born in a sob story of a country, subjected to a sob story childhood, dedicated her life to working with other sob stories. Tugs at the heartstrings, it really does. Can't you see the violence inherent in the system? Help, help, someone's being repressed!

      William Fucking Shatner made people smile. Made people laugh. Made people proud to say "That dopey guy at the help of the Enterprise? He's actually one of US!"

      Michelle Jean's the better human being. She's made a real impact on people's lives. But Shatner (personally, I'd consider Gretzky as a candidate) made people proud to be Canadian, rather than guilty for being white, male, wealthy, or some combination of all three.

    39. Re:As a Canadian by camperdave · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I'm more than happy for Kirk to be the guy schmoozing on behalf of my country.

      Kirk, yes. Shatner... not floating my boat.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    40. Re:As a Canadian by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      A Shatner Speech... from... the... Throne would be... genuinely... epic... but only... that one time.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    41. Re:As a Canadian by tgd · · Score: 1

      I say: fuck that noise, ya hoooooser

      There, I fixed it for ya.

    42. Re:As a Canadian by gwn · · Score: 1

      But Shatner did do a fun "I am Canadian" routine! Seriously, I would agree he is not in the same league as dozens of truly deserving Canadians who have worked hard for a better Canada.

    43. Re:As a Canadian by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly believe that William Shatner is one of the best of us?

      To put it bluntly, can you name any Canadian accomplishment more significant than "Captain Kirk is a Canadian"?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    44. Re:As a Canadian by colesw · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what a Panera Bread is, but suppose they don't want one?

    45. Re:As a Canadian by ahankinson · · Score: 1

      Just because we're a fairly well-run country and the GG doesn't *have* to do anything doesn't mean she doesn't have real power. She is the Commander-in-Chief of the military. All military personnel swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen, and by extension the office of the GG, not to the government of Canada. If we ever have a government that needs to be forcefully deposed, she would be the one commanding it, not the Prime Minister or the defence staff.

      The GG is also the one that can dissolve parliament, declare a government or sign a bill into law. Granted, she usually does these on the advice of the Prime Minister or Parliament, but to say her role is solely ceremonial is to ignore the significant "checks and balances" the GG's office brings to the whole system.

    46. Re:As a Canadian by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, Canada will get plenty of worldly recognition this coming weekend when we host the G8 and G20 conferences.
      You may have also heard about an event back in February called the 2010 Winter Olympics. I'm pretty sure we got noticed.

      Shatner is a Canadian icon. Do I want him to represent our Country internationally? No way. He's already an unofficial "Canadian Spokesman", let's let him stay in that nostalgic role and remember the good times. I think he'll do a much better job playing a cranky old man in Shit My Dad Says.

      Should he be the one swearing in the next Prime Minister? I... Sure... Hope... Not!

      Just think of the portraits at Rideau Hall for our last run of Governers General: Romeo LeBlanc, Adrienne Clarkson, Michaelle Jean and.. William Shatner?? If nothing else, we're at least due for someone who didn't come from (or reside in) Quebec. It would be nice if they were somewhat experienced with Politics and Parliamentary Procedure. I don't think the Enterprise's Court-Martial rules are similar enough to be called "experience".

    47. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, it's mostly the bleating of the Liberals, socialists and separatists who are unhappy that they aren't getting their way.

      It's important to note that the "Liberals, socialists and separatists" represented the majority of seats in Parliament, and the overwhelming majority of the popular vote in the previous election. The sitting government has been trying to govern as if they have a majority, which is not the mandate they were given. The opposition has an obligation to withdraw confidence when the government does not represent the interests of Canada.

      Despite being obscure, proroguing has been around a long time, and it has a long legal tradition & precedent behind it.

      Proroguing has never been news until Stephen Harper did it. For example, under Jean Chretien, proroguing was used a few times without the slightest criticism (to be honest, I'm active in politics, and I didn't even notice at the time).

      Proroguing Parliament has a long tradition - when the work of government in that session is done. It does not have a long tradition of being used to avoid the government being accountable to Parliament. The use of this Parliamentary procedure to avoid permitting Parliament to exercise it's right to withdraw confidence in the government is an abomination, no matter who uses it in that way.

    48. Re:As a Canadian by ahankinson · · Score: 1

      The key word being 'acts'. There's no real power, so I don't know what your problem is here.

      The Queen is the Commander-in-Chief of the Canadian military, and by extension the GG acts as CiC. At a whim, she could call in the military on the government and be perfectly within her rights to do so. In reality, she would need a very good reason, but the power still rests in her office and no other. I'd say that's "real" power.

      Yeah, it is. As another poster said, most Canadians don't know what or who the GG is. What you feel/think != what the majority of Canadians think.

      The majority of Canadians also don't know how an internal combustion engine works, or that the big blue E on their computer isn't "The Internet." Judging the importance of an office by how many people know what it's for is a very poor metric.

      Ahhh, see, here's your problem. This has nothing whatsoever to do with Democracy: This is an appointed position. Glad I could clear that up for you.

      Democracy doesn't necessarily mean "elected." Michaëlle Jean isn't nobility, she is a Haitian-born Canadian citizen appointed to the office because of her contribution to Canadian society. I don't understand how people think that just because someone is elected they're a better representative. Especially in Canada, where more often than not the person who is elected to an office only gains the plurality, and not the majority, of the votes.

      Democracy is more about government of the people, for the people. Elections are a very expedient way of doing this for most cases, but I see no problem in having a few offices where they appoint someone "from the people" because of his or her contribution to society. Theoretically, anyone can be GG: You, me, your neighbour, an actor, a journalist... How is that not "democracy?"

    49. Re:As a Canadian by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Not really. Whilst all these things may be technically correct, they are in practise not. The Queen or her representatives can't do anything at all, except what they are told by the civil service, who are the ones who have always held all the power.

    50. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, they hunt and eat seal hearts out of "necessity" as per m.ducharme, but they would really not prefer to have a Panera Bread restaurant next door. Cause you know, the real estate prices would really drop then! And all that free time from not living at a subsistence level, that would be just the worst thing possible for society right? And really, who needs time to think or create when you can be out killing stuff?

    51. Re:As a Canadian by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Stunt"? She was participating in the traditional lifestyle of some of Canada's Native People. It was no stunt, it's called respect, and it's something I sure-as-hell hope our Governer General has in spades when it comes to dealing with the citizens of our country.

      She speaks French in Quebec, She eats Lobster in Nova Scotia and she eats seal heart when she's visiting Inuit people.

    52. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to a security guard I know who protects famous people at conventions, most notably Leonard Nimoy, Shatner is not a dick. He's just afraid of crowds. Get him alone and he's a great guy. Get him in front of a crowd and he locks up. Of course, for a ceremonial position like this, that kind of makes him a bad choice, but it doesn't make him a dick.

    53. Re:As a Canadian by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

      ...when you can be out killing stuff?

      Ah, and now your true colours shine through. You don't care at all about the Governor General.

      Protip: Humans are carnivores, get over it.

    54. Re:As a Canadian by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1

      Well, that's true of all forms of government, even dictatorships. "Advisors" have always provided the nuts and bolts of policy, while "leaders" have communicated this policy to all the stakeholders.

      The GG certainly isn't free to run amok like a half-cocked dictator, but neither is any referee. A referee's duty is to enforce the rules, but also not to interfere if the players are doing a good job of playing by the rules. Canada has generally been blessed with responsible government, so our referee basically sits on her ass and cuts ribbons most days.

    55. Re:As a Canadian by Socguy · · Score: 1

      Not true... this January the GG of Canada had a choice to make about who would be the prime minister of Canada, when the current Prime minister approached her and told her that he wished to shut down parliament after something like three days. The opposition signed a powersharing deal in which they would be able to form a coalition government. Shuttering parliament was seen across the country as a political maneuver to avoid defeat. All eyes across the country turned to the GG as she was the arbiter who would ultimately decide who became prime minister.

    56. Re:As a Canadian by abigor · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot. Please tell me you aren't Canadian.

    57. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What has William Fucking Shatner done?

      As James T. Kirk, he's single-handedly saved the universe almost every time he's appeared on screen. Can this Michelle Jean person make that claim?

    58. Re:As a Canadian by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      > Aw come on, let's be brutally honest here - GG of any commonwealth country is a ceremonial position.

      That is not correct. The Governor General has a significant amount of power, and is an integral part of the government. In principle the Governor General is the most powerful person in Canada. Just because those powers are rarely used in an overt way does not mean that they do not exist.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    59. Re:As a Canadian by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      What part of 'constitutional crisis' do you fuckheads not understand?

      ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    60. Re:As a Canadian by value_added · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [W]e LIKE the Queen. She's a classy dame

      I remember singing "God Save the Queen" in grade school. The Union Jack had been replaced the red and white maple leaf flag, of course, but the Queen's image was still on our currency and no one but ornithologists gave much thought to loons.

      So, yeah, you could say we like it that way.

      Pomp, circumstance, and the trappings of culture may not hold the appeal they did in other times, but every time I watch televised coverage of a US president giving a speech and I hear "Hail to the Chief" being played by a military band, or attend an even where the national anthem is played and see people struggling to remember the less-than-inspiring words ("the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air") and/or hit all the notes (1-1/2 octaves), I think back to how things were in Canada.

      As for the sovereignty argument, I'd suggest that's overblown. The US opted for armed insurrection, so I suppose it's natural for there to be a focus on such things as "rights" or "freedom and liberty" to the exclusion of everything else that's just as important. I find that approach naive and simplistic (something you'd expect from an adolescent, perhaps), but who am I to judge?

      A Canadian writer once wrote something to the effect that Canadians defer to authority, while Americans bow to power. I suspect that's a distinction too subtle for most Americans to understand. Or appreciate.

    61. Re:As a Canadian by colonelquesadilla · · Score: 1

      Plus he's a badass negotiator, you ever seen those priceline ads?

      --
      It's either false dichotomies, or the terrorists win, you decide.
    62. Re:As a Canadian by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that a queen or king might actually try to reestablish a real monarchy again someday? I'm pretty sure than even Canada would revolt over that.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    63. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What has William Shatner done to deserve this?

      He would certainly improve the styling of the governor's chair, let alone the uniforms of his assistants. There would be buttons and stuff.

    64. Re:As a Canadian by Colonel+Fahlt · · Score: 1

      Also, the Governor General is the Commander-in-Chief of the Canadian Armed Forces, which is an effectively ceremonial role. However, the Commander-in-Chief is obligated to prevent unconstitutional use of Canada's military forces. (Okay, technically the Queen is the Commander-in-Chief, but this role is delegated to the Governor General, who also uses the title.)

    65. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 1

      Protip right back at ya: Humans got out of the caves and invented food technology some thousands of years ago. You have better stuff to do with your time and brains than play pretend Tarzan.

      While I don't condone animal cruelty, I don't much care for "mother nature" and its mindlessness either.

    66. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, call me when she cavorts with the cannibals too will ya?
      Also, lets have some respect for the Indian caste system while we're at it. Those are some endangered people right there. Entire livelihoods being destroyed, I tells ya!

    67. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 1

      What difference does that make? Do you feel all Canadians should think alike?
      Or do you think no Canadian could possibly be an idiot? Slight suggestion that Canadians are a "master race" perhaps (or master nation, I guess)?

    68. Re:As a Canadian by easterberry · · Score: 1

      Yay! I can't wait for my city to become a temporary police state for the DeceptiCons! Seriously. moving throught TO is going to be hell.

    69. Re:As a Canadian by easterberry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah. Like those assholes who eat pig meat, or cow meat OR ANY OTHER MEAT. IT'S JUST A TYPE OF MEAT. GET OVER IT. I'm sorry you find that particular animal cute but that's what they have up there. I'll eat seal heart. Hell, as long as it's nobody's pet I'll eat cat or dog too. When I decided I ate meat instead of being a vegetarian I agreed that animals were fair game for food. We've both decided that we're totally cool with murdering a living thing and eating it, please drop the pretense that you're somehow a better person because you insist on being shallow while you do it.

    70. Re:As a Canadian by Zoinky · · Score: 1

      And shockingly, she did exactly what the prime minister asked her to do. Just like the governor general always does. That event only CONFIRMED (by the GG herself) that the role of the governor general is ceremonial and that her job is to confirm and carry out the wishes of the government.

    71. Re:As a Canadian by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

      I'm not condoning animal cruelty (and you're not saying that I am), but you will no doubt have noticed that even after inventing food technology, we're still carnivores and require meat that needs to be killed before we eat it.

    72. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're being disingenuous.

      LOL! Who talks like that... Disingenuous. Are you trying to sound smart so thesaurus'd a word?

    73. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "The Governor General has a significant amount of power, and is an integral part of the government. In principle the Governor General is the most powerful person in Canada. Just because those powers are rarely used in an overt way does not mean that they do not exist." do YOU not understand?

      Do you not speak English?

    74. Re:As a Canadian by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      True dat, I shoulda just told him to stop talking shit, eh?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    75. Re:As a Canadian by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      If you think it's purely ceremonial, look back to December of 2008 where, at the behest of under-fire PM Stephen Harper

      I think you need to re-read your statement. The GG did exactly what the PM asked/told her to do. This is completely consistent with a ceremonial role.

    76. Re:As a Canadian by largesnike · · Score: 1

      GG of any commonwealth country is a ceremonial position...You're the Queen's representative, and she has no power or responsibilities

      I don't know about Canada but the GG certainly has had a role in another Commonwealth country!

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
    77. Re:As a Canadian by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Most of the time. Not always. And the not always gets more common when you have a prime minister who likes to play procedural games. A lot of those procedural games require requesting that the governor general do something. And the GG CAN say screw off and get back to work.

    78. Re:As a Canadian by mcornelius · · Score: 1

      Ouch, my pedant gland is hurting.

      Your foot? That hardly seems relevant.

    79. Re:As a Canadian by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Her Majesty is what, 84? She isn't going to live forever *although her mother lived to be 100). How do Canadians feel about Prince Charles?

    80. Re:As a Canadian by gangien · · Score: 1

      things as "rights" or "freedom and liberty" to the exclusion of everything else that's just as important

      And what are these other things?

    81. Re:As a Canadian by F1re · · Score: 1

      The Governor General acts as the head of the Canadian Government.

      No, the GG is the head of state, or representing the head of state (Queen) depending how you look at it.

      The Prime Minister is the head of government.

      --
      ...there is no sig...
    82. Re:As a Canadian by bakdor · · Score: 1

      Aw come on, let's be brutally honest here - GG of any commonwealth country is a ceremonial position. Your job, such as it is, is to go around and do photo ops and shit like that. You're the Queen's representative, and she has no power or responsibilities, so Shatner will have even less. This is actually a pretty good choice. As a Canadian, I'm more than happy for Kirk to be the guy schmoozing on behalf of my country.

      Not quite true - do a search for what the GG did in Australia in 1975.

    83. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 1

      About half a billion humans would disagree with you and dispute the "carnivore" label. And I think they're getting by just fine.

    84. Re:As a Canadian by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      A Canadian writer once wrote something to the effect that Canadians defer to authority, while Americans bow to power. I suspect that's a distinction too subtle for most Americans to understand. Or appreciate.

      Fortunately, even us stupid Americans can pick up on your not-so-subtle dig. Asshole.

    85. Re:As a Canadian by easterberry · · Score: 1

      You said, "the seal heart stunt". Implying that eating seal hearts would be a stunt as opposed to any other official meeting where meat was served. If you were arguing that eating ANY meat was wrong you would have to consider nearly every meal she ever eats a "stunt" but you were clearly singling out the one where the animal being eaten was cute. If you're vegetarian then you're in even less position to argue because now you're holding a culture a set of moral standards they are physically incapable of living up to due to the nature of their climate.

    86. Re:As a Canadian by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      (1) the lady's name is Michaelle, not Michelle (and, to be perfectly pedantic, the first "e" even has an umlaut over it). Repetition says this wasn't just a typo on your part.

      (2) Jean was an abject apologist for anything and everything Canadian. If there was the slightest possibility that Canada bore even minimal responsibility for something -- and sometimes even if there wasn't -- she was right there to apologize on our collective behalf. Example: the Rwandan civil war. We didn't start it. We didn't stop it. What the hell did that have to do with us?

      (3) Jean didn't "handle" Harper; she was a toady and a stooly for him. When he said jump, she jumped.

      (4) Jean arrogated powers to herself that aren't incumbent upon the holder of the office she holds. In October 2009 at a UNESCO meeting in Paris, she claimed to be the "head of state" of Canada. This is patently false! The Queen is the head of state of Canada; the Governor-General is but the viceregal representative of Her Majesty.

      For these reasons, I will not be sorry to see her gone in a few weeks. Yes, I ... am ... Canadian! (Sorry I had to rain on your parade.)

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    87. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your head out of your ass. This appointment is not some minor office that nobody cares about. We are selecting someone to represent Canada to the world, and represent the Queen in this country. I expect that person to be one of the best of us. Do you honestly believe that William Shatner is one of the best of us?

      What's this "we", kemo-sabe? Unless your name is Stephen Harper and you live at 24 Sussex Drive in Ottawa, you don't have a fucking thing to say about it.

      Pull your own cranium out for a breath of fresh air!

    88. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, it was a lame publicity stunt, designed to get on the newspapers, and give the finger to the europeans.

      No need to invoke my moral standards or lack thereof, to see that was what it was meant for. That she felt the need to do it and chose to use raw seal hearts as a prop says a lot about her character. In a different era, she'd have fit right in a circus freak show I guess, you know, the ones with weird animals on display for our amusement?

      "Physically incapable... " of eating anything else? Haha, and also all those scientists in the antarctic also have to airlift in tons of raw seal hearts I guess? Wait, no, its raw penguin hearts for those guys... And how do people ever manage to live on ships and submarines? Six months at a time without access to raw seal hearts must leave them feeling ravenous at the end of a tour of duty. Or do they just hunt a lot of seals beforehand and store the meat? No that wouldn't be it, in your world, I guess all the food technology humans invented for distribution and storage isn't actually used by anyone (except vegetarians...). Very puzzling!

    89. Re:As a Canadian by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The GG sacked the Whitlam government in Australia during the 70's and installed the the oppsition as caretaker, technically Whitlam could have sacked the GG if he had of moved first. The reason for the sacking was a situation similar to California's problem, ie: parliment couldn't pass a budget and Whitlam refused to call an election. Whitlam did some good things but refusing to call an election and then perpetually whinning about the sacking during the forced election campaign was just dumb.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    90. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's important to note that the "Liberals, socialists and separatists" represented the majority of seats in Parliament, and the overwhelming majority of the popular vote in the previous election.

      Ha. The current Conservative government has the same percentage of the popular vote that Chretien did during his majorities. Did anyone question his right to govern?

      The sitting government has been trying to govern as if they have a majority, which is not the mandate they were given. The opposition has an obligation to withdraw confidence when the government does not represent the interests of Canada.

      It's debatable whether the government does not represent the interests of Canada. It's clear that the government does not represent the interests of the opposition parties (NDP, Liberals and Bloc).

      The opposition parties are fully entitled to vote non-confidence whenever they choose. But they have chosen not to. You'll have to ask them why.

      Proroguing Parliament has a long tradition - when the work of government in that session is done. It does not have a long tradition of being used to avoid the government being accountable to Parliament. The use of this Parliamentary procedure to avoid permitting Parliament to exercise it's right to withdraw confidence in the government is an abomination, no matter who uses it in that way.

      Ha. The NDP, Liberals and Bloc did NOT mention the possibility of a coalition at all during the campaign. Only after the election, but before parliament opened, the they announce their secret deal.

      Now, under Canadian parliamentary tradition, this is legal, albeit obscure and anti-democratic. Many of the party members & supporters of the NDP, Liberals and Bloc were angry & dead set against the idea when it became public. They would have voted otherwise had they known.

      So, the prime minister responded with a legal, but obscure tactic - proroguing parliament.

    91. Re:As a Canadian by easterberry · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the, what? 20 people at Antarctic Research? Not the same an entire society living above the permafrost line.

    92. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to wikipedia, 1000 - 5000. Care to also estimate the number of people living aboard cruise ships, yachts, naval fleets and submarines in the world at any point in time?

    93. Re:As a Canadian by easterberry · · Score: 1

      Sure thing. As soon as you explain how that's in any way comparable to an entire society that developed without supply lines and lives above the permafrost line.

    94. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, humans were in caves too at one point. You suggesting we should go back to that? Or that there was something wrong with moving out of the caves and using our brains for something other than subsistence living?

    95. Re:As a Canadian by ifdef · · Score: 1

      Just as a by-the-way, "apologist" does not mean what you seem to think it does.

    96. Re:As a Canadian by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

      They can dispute all they like, Evolution doesn't lie. How many of those half-billion have to take supplements along with their Vegetarian or Vegan diet just to stay alive?

      Just because they choose to not eat meat doesn't mean they're not carnivores.

    97. Re:As a Canadian by rjiy · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fashionable_Nonsense

      Heh. Also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progress_(history) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Good_and_Evil

      Do you really believe no morals exist and all cultures and customs are of equal value? Honor killings, suicide bombings, child marriages etc are fine with you just because its someone's "custom"? Sorry, that's not for me.

    98. Re:As a Canadian by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      > What part of 'constitutional crisis' do you fuckheads not
      > understand?

      > ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT?

      Yawn...

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    99. Re:As a Canadian by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      You are correct! Thanks!

      I meant "apologizer" ... there doesn't seem to be a more specific term for "one who apologizes excessively and without cause".

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
  3. You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook Gro by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Might Shatner Boldly Lead Canada As Governor?

    The only 'short list' I could find referenced was simply which Facebook groups had the most members. If anyone else can find anything worth noting from this article other than the fact that Star Trek fans are more numerous on Facebook than Leonard Cohen fans ... let me know. PROTIP: Facebook is not a cross section of the populace nor does that cross section necessarily think they are voting for William Shatner as Governor General when they click a tiny button to join that group. A flippant mouse click can be just as much a joke or laugh than it can be a true desire.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  4. Governor GENERAL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not Governor. It' Governor General. It's in the summary, but not in the headline.

    Canada has a different system of government, and we don't have Governors per se.

    1. Re:Governor GENERAL ... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      and we don't have Governors per se.

      Yes we do. We just call them Premiers. Having said that: Taco, fix the fucking headline already, you dumb american hick.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Governor GENERAL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, since American governors are the chief executives of their states, Canadian premiers aren't really analagous. Premiers, like the PM, are just heads of government. Ceremonial or not, the closest parallel in Canada to a state governor would be the province's lieutenant governor (and like a good Canadian, you should read that as "leftenant"...).

  5. Not just CA by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California."

    Like... the United States (which isn't entirely composed of California, in spite of rumors)?

    1. Re:Not just CA by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California."

      Like... the United States (which isn't entirely composed of California, in spite of rumors)?

      I hear that the president often operates outside of California:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    2. Re:Not just CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should know... the OP's link was to Reagan's whitehouse.gov page. Sorry, better luck next time.

    3. Re:Not just CA by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      So in this thread, we say the words 'president' and 'California' and then link to a page about Reagan? You guys already covered the top two google hits, so here's #3

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:Not just CA by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Zombie Ronald Reagan

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  6. So in other words. . . by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Shatner will boldly go where no Canuck has gone before?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:So in other words. . . by whitedsepdivine · · Score: 1

      Denny Crane

  7. Highest Offices by MarvinIsANerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California"

    Absolutely. Forgotten about our 40th president of the United States, have we?

    1. Re:Highest Offices by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, he just has a stricter definition of what constitutes acting. Obviously not that strict, though...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Highest Offices by Mr+Z · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, are you saying Arnie's a better actor than Ronnie? Hmm... if you took the ratio of their talent, I think you'd have to apply L'Hopital's rule to figure out whether the ratio was above or below 1. ;-)

    3. Re:Highest Offices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think hes also saying that being a puppet sat on Nancy's hand isn't really a president.

    4. Re:Highest Offices by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Arnie never got upstaged by a chimp. I'd say that tips it, just.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Might Shatner Boldly Lead Canada As Governor?

    The only 'short list' I could find referenced was simply which Facebook groups had the most members.

    Oh come on, next you will be saying that this is not news for Nerds. At least it is a current story!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  9. Not a serious contender by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shatner isn't bilingual, which is a serious strike against anyone vying for the GG position. Also note that the Canadian Governor General is essentially powerless in modern government - similar to the role played by the Queen. While, theoretically, the GG has the ability to impact parliamentary procedures in rare circumstances, it's not real power. Instead, the GG gives speeches, meets dignitaries, and spends a lot of time paying respect to unlucky soldiers arriving back from Afghanistan in coffins.

    1. Re:Not a serious contender by buraianto · · Score: 1

      Shatner is bilingual. He speaks Esperanto. Or, at least, he could when he made a movie spoken in Esperanto.

    2. Re:Not a serious contender by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Shatner isn't bilingual, which is a serious strike against anyone vying for the GG position.

      Shatner has lived in Hollywood for ages, which is a serious strike against anyone vying for the GG position.

      For all intents and purposes, he's an American at this point.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Not a serious contender by pavon · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, none of the actors learned Esperanto when making Incubus. They were just speaking words phonetically, and you can hear mispronunciations throughout the movie.

    4. Re:Not a serious contender by barzok · · Score: 1

      Do Sam Neill, Alec Baldwin, Tim Curry, Stellan Skaarsgard (I know I spelled that wrong), Sean Connery, et. al. know Russian, or did they just memorize their lines for The Hunt for Red October?

    5. Re:Not a serious contender by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Shatner isn't bilingual

      Wow, way to spit in the eye of a native Montrealer. Mod parent down: -1 Incorrect.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:Not a serious contender by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Shatner isn't bilingual Wow, way to spit in the eye of a native Montrealer. Mod parent down: -1 Incorrect.

      I went to high school in Montreal. Half of my family live there and I can say unequivocally that "native Montrealer" != "bilingual"

      Now, it is probably the highest concentration of (English/French) bilingual people in Canada. But saying that he must be bilingual because he from Montreal is like saying that someone must be Cajun because they're from New Orleans.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    7. Re:Not a serious contender by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      But saying that he must be bilingual because he from Montreal

      Never said that, was just pointing out that parent was incorrect in a very curt fashion.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    8. Re:Not a serious contender by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      N.B. I'm not saying he doesn't... I'm just saying the logic is faulty. Similarly it's not terribly insulting to call an Anglo Montrealer of his generation mono-lingual. In fact you'd sort of expect an Anglo of his age who left Montreal over 40 years ago to either not speak French at all or to speak it very badly.

      (I seem to actually recall him speaking French at some point... and my recollection is that it was not pretty... but I have never met him not tried to speak French with him so my faulty memory has little value here...)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    9. Re:Not a serious contender by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Shatner isn't bilingual, which is a serious strike against anyone vying for the GG position.

      Shatner has lived in Hollywood for ages, which is a serious strike against anyone vying for the GG position.

      For all intents and purposes, he's an American at this point.

      Yup, I would be insulted as a Canadian if he (Or quite frankly any other actor) were appointed. Nice guy and all, but just not a GG candidate.

      We have had a couple of very successful journalists do the job, but there's a huge difference between a veteran reporter and a veteran actor.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    10. Re:Not a serious contender by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      That's what I was going to say.

      The strike against him is that he doesn't speak French. Though I really wonder how he could maintain his ability to speak Esperanto, given that it was a dead language as soon as it was imagined.

      It's like learning to speak Latin - yeah you can do it, but why? All you really want is to be able to read it, and even then there isn't a whole lot of a point to it.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    11. Re:Not a serious contender by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      The strike against him is that he doesn't speak French.

      So what? It's not like he's running for office in France or anything...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    12. Re:Not a serious contender by master_p · · Score: 1

      Jean Luc Picard speaks French and English as his native language! now that settles who is the better captain: the one who is bilingual!!!!

    13. Re:Not a serious contender by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      That is pronounce Nawlin's you Yankee.

    14. Re:Not a serious contender by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      You may or may not be serious...

      Canada has two official languages, English and French. If you don't speak French, Quebec would have une vache. While we could teach him French, it's likely that we'll just get someone else. It's way too complicated to go over on /., so just look it up on wikipedia if you truly care.

      Romeo Dallaire would be a vastly superior choice. He's a real life hero rather than a made-up one.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    15. Re:Not a serious contender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While, theoretically, the GG has the ability to impact parliamentary procedures in rare circumstances, it's not real power. Instead, the GG gives speeches, meets dignitaries, and spends a lot of time paying respect to unlucky soldiers arriving back from Afghanistan in coffins....

      ... and grants the Prime Minister permission to suspend parliament for months at a time.

      To be sure, requesting such permission is a formality, but could you imagine if a GG with political backbone were to have denied such that baldly self-serving policial manouevre? Even if such denial would carry no technical, legal weight, it would sure as hell have some political impact.

      In other words: to hell with constitutional monarchism -- give me my damned democracy, oh great Shatner!

    16. Re:Not a serious contender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shatner isn't bilingual

      Et il a été nais en Quebec! Viva Maryse Ouelett! Qui les slashdoters approvent!

    17. Re:Not a serious contender by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      That is pronounce Nawlin's you Yankee.

      1. It may be pronounced Nawlins, but it is still spelled New Orleans. (Nouveaux Orleans pour les vrais Acadiens...)
      2. I grew up in the part of Ontario where 100 years ago you could ruin a politican by labeling him an American sympathizer, Yankee is fighting words.

      :)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    18. Re:Not a serious contender by clgoh · · Score: 1

      Nouvelle-Orléans, actually.

    19. Re:Not a serious contender by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Nom de diu, j'ai trompe alors! Heck, I can't even spell English...

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    20. Re:Not a serious contender by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Shatner isn't bilingual, which is a serious strike against anyone vying for the GG position.

      Indeed. To paraphrase Canadian columnist Alan Fotheringham (who said this of newfie MP John Crosbie) Shatner speaks neither of Canada's two official languages.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    21. Re:Not a serious contender by WoodenTable · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? William Shatner is fluently bilingual in both French and English. He's even better than our current PM, Stephen Harper, was when he became prime minister. (To Harper's credit, he improved massively in a short time afterward)

    22. Re:Not a serious contender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > essentially powerless in modern government - similar to the role played by the Queen.

      Actually, the Queen is the absolute ruler of Canada. Think Canada is a democracy ruled by the people? Wrong - go read the constitution. The Queen has the power to overrule the government on all matters and can do pretty much anything she wants. In practice she uses her power rarely, but the constitution grants her the power to be a dictator is she so chooses.

  10. Proposing to the Queen? by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    Sorry dude, she's already married! You will never be king.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Proposing to the Queen? by merichards · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but the current queen is a queen regnant (her parent was the monarch, so she inherited), therefore her husband is not the king, he's simply the Prince Consort. So even if she wasn't married, you couldn't become king by marrying her. In other words, there's no point bumping off the current Danish / Greek incumbent.

  11. Better as Governor General than actor? by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    Coz yes, he's an icon to the Trekkies, but he is such a bad actor, I hope he will be better as Governor General...

  12. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by e4g4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, as always - the summary is a little off. Shatner is by no means on the "short list". The "short list" has three people (who look like they're actually appropriate candidates) on it, the article happens to also mention two entries from the much longer list of "who the internet thinks it would be funny if they were nominated for this position".

    --
    The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
  13. Marooned eternity, in the center of a dead country by Conchobair · · Score: 4, Funny

    KHHHHAAAAAAAANADA!

  14. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    While I agree it's not really anything to report on YET, but don't doubt the power of something like facebook. It's not official polls but they can give some insight on people's opinions. Granted, this one is a bit of nerd-out kind of group, but suppose there was a group "I don't want our troops overseas" that had say... 3 Million + members. Think that might send a message?

  15. Huh? by Galestar · · Score: 1

    Is it April Fools again already?!?

    --
    AccountKiller
  16. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by SpeedyDX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a retarded story. The only mention of Shatner in the whole FA is this:

    One of the more controversial names being thrown out there on Facebook is that of Captain Kirk, actor William Shatner.

    "It's time for Canada to boldly go where no country has gone before," notes a nearly 10,000-strong Facebook fan page that supports the idea.

    There might have been another submission that could have been rejected that included this link, but, again, basically right off the bat, you see:

    The Facebook fan page "Help Nominate William Shatner for Governor General" launched on March 22, 2010.

    The OP is an asshole for submitting this as a serious story and writing the summary as if it were legit, and Taco, representative of all the editors I suppose, is being irresponsible for posting such a bullshit story like this on the front page.

    Many people have been lamenting that the quality of stories have been going down in Slashdot. I don't really have that much of a gripe about that. I don't come to Slashdot for breaking news or the like. But when you start to post flat out falsehoods (there is no shortlist, there's not even a rumour, it's just a god damn Facebook group), that's when you cross the line into tabloidism. Horrible.

  17. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

    Join this group please if you want Captain Kirk to become the Governor of Canada:

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Captain-Kirk-for-Governor-of-Canada/138562856154180

  18. He "Shatner-ed" on the 50 yd line by dkh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In high school there was a small group of miscreants who took the phrase "To boldly go where no man has gone before" to new depths of depravity. To this group to "Shatner" was to eliminate bodily waste in a place where it was presumed "no man has gone before."

    One year at homecoming it was reported that somebody had "Shatnered" on the 50 yard line.

    --
    My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    1. Re:He "Shatner-ed" on the 50 yd line by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Well, shat is the past tense of shit, so to "Shatner" is a nice pun, and clearly conveys the rules of the game without having to state them at all.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:He "Shatner-ed" on the 50 yd line by QuietObserver · · Score: 1

      In high school there was a small group of miscreants who took the phrase "To boldly go where no man has gone before" to new depths of depravity.

      That's why there's a toilet on the ceiling in the bathroom. My brother said this one time after I modified the Star Trek opening in relation to our family's then 1978 Plymouth Voyager van.

  19. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    "I don't want our troops overseas" that had say... 3 Million + members. Think that might send a message?

    It might. But what I meant by cross section was that you're not sampling Canada, you're sampling Facebook. Are all the members Canadian? Does the group have a solid representative amount of Inuit? What about the elderly?

    The problem with your proposed group of three million against the war is the simple fact that it is highly probable that users with internet connections heavily using Facebook and joining Facebook groups are biased towards liberal ideals. I'm not claiming that, I'm just stating the risk. The other risk is that that they were never given two options (pro/anti) they were only given anti-war. Facebook is not a voting mechanism. I can be a member of both a pro and anti group if I want to! You are not reaching the people who live in BFE Western Texas on a dude ranch. You are reaching technologically savvy citizens and not the elder generation. I don't need to cite my sources because this is a known common issue among marketing and surveys. It just blows my mind how often people forget this.

    Again, when I joined your anti-war group, I might not have considered this a true endorsement and the implications. It's not even the equivalent of signing a petition nor is it a 1 citizen to 1 account guarantee. It's also almost always public who is in that group, affecting who joins and who doesn't! The problems are nearly endless in relying on this to "send clear messages."

    --
    My work here is dung.
  20. Re:Is it just me or is Slashdot totally broken tod by armanox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've having the same issues.

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  21. Shatner IS bilingual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He speaks both English and Canadian!

  22. Shatner is... by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    bilingual if... by that... you mean ... that he... groups his... words in... groups of ... two? The... random emphasis ... and random... questions are... useless though?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  23. Re:Is it just me or is Slashdot totally broken tod by KPexEA · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    RE: open a comment inline without going to a new window

    I thought it was just me. Hopefully they will fix it soon!

  24. Regan? by BandoMcHando · · Score: 1

    It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California.

    Or.... the entire USA perhaps? (Although admitedly he was also the Govenor of California before that apparently if wikipedia is to be believed).

    1. Re:Regan? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that was like, a billion years ago.

      We need relevance man, relevance!

      What's funny about this story though, is Shatner isn't actually on any short list for GG. There is a facebook movement to put him there.

      In other words, the whole summary is a complete fucking lie. Gotta love Slashdot!

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Regan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Although admitedly he was also the Govenor of California before that apparently if wikipedia is to be believed).

      Speaking as a native Californian who was there at the time, I can confirm the fact that Ronald Reagan was indeed once governor of this state. Much like the United State after Reagan's term as President, his governorship marked the beginning of of this once-fine state's long decline.

  25. Canada Day is June 1st by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    June 1st is Canada Day! Congratulations to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, on the occasion of what will be her 58th anniversary as head of state of the Dominion of Canada! All loyal Canadians, bow your heads to royalty! (Hey, Obama did it so it's not all bad).

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  26. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Taco, representative of all the editors I suppose, is being irresponsible

    Now I know you're new here!

    Seriously, this is SOP. Learn to love it or learn to be disappointed.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  27. I demand a return to patronage appointments! by billtom · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of all these artist/journalist GGs. Let's get the job back to it's proper political patronage role. Forget about political correctness, the criteria should be: which old white guy raised the most money for the party in power.

  28. Re:Canada Day is July 1st by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    July 1st. I said it already! No more corrections please. Darn four-letter months sound the same. (bet there are already 3 replies while I wait for my "slow down cowboy!" 120 second repost time)

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  29. Can - You by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Imagine - him - reading - the - speach - from - the - throne - .

    1. Re:Can - You by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I'd rather Not.

  30. Not with our current Prime Minister by RichMan · · Score: 1

    Donny Crane. Sure it was an acting gig, but there are a lot of "screen moments" that can be extracted.

    What is politics but a PR play and Canada's current prime minister is way to image conscious to go anywhere near a Donny Crane.

    Infidelity. Check.
    Gay Marriage. Check.
    Insensitivity. Check.
    Politically Incorrect. Check.

    1. Re:Not with our current Prime Minister by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      What is politics but a PR play and Canada's current prime minister is way to image conscious to go anywhere near a Donny Crane.

      Wow, I don't mean to be a douche and a pedant, but I had a really hard time parsing that sentence. Let me help you:

      "What is politics but a PR play? Canada's current prime minister is way too image conscious to go anywhere near a Donny Crane."

      It really doesn't work as one sentence; the two statements are not related. Trying to combine them makes the idea clumsy and confusing. You can add a comma before the "and" before Canada to make it grammatically correct, but it doesn't really help. The ideas clash when combined.

      Splitting them up makes the statement far more eloquent and much easier to read.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Not with our current Prime Minister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean Denny Crane?

    3. Re:Not with our current Prime Minister by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Never mind the fact that the character's name is "Denny", not "Donny".

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  31. Re:Is it just me or is Slashdot totally broken tod by Junior+Samples · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have moderation points, but I am unable to moderate -- nothing happens.

  32. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    I know its not going to reach everyone, thats why a pro or anti group managing to get to 3 Million members is only 3 million members and not the full population of Canada.

    And I think apathy for voting is a bigger issue than people being technologically incapable. You probably have more 18 and 19 year olds who don't vote but are on Facebook than you have people in regions of Canada without access to the internet. I don't have any stats to back that up so take that with a grain of salt. Our company has branches in Yellowknife and Whitehorse, the capitals of the Yukon and Northwest Territories, so its not like everything out there is a barren wasteland without any connection to the technological world.

    I'm not saying that Facebook is a great voting system, thats not what I'm trying to say at all. I'm just saying that it's a better indicator of whats going on then ignoring it completely. After all, those Young Tech Savvy people using it are going to be the voters for the next little while.

  33. Acting is an issue for polticis? by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    "It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California."

    It's happened with more then Arnold.

    President of United States. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan#Radio_and_film)

    US Senate. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono#Entertainment_career)

    Governor for Minnesota. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Ventura#Governor_of_Minnesota)

    Mileage may vary with each person but entertainers have a good shot at doing politics just as much as anyone else. Heck just imagine one day waking up to President Gaga, it could happen if she really wanted to do it.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:Acting is an issue for polticis? by sjaskow · · Score: 1

      Um, Sonny Bono wasn't part of the Senate, he was a member of the US House of Representatives.

      A better choice for the Senate would have been Fred Thompson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Thompson or Al Franken http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Franken.

  34. Actors make good politicians by Dalzhim · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows a politician needs good acting in order to make people believe what they are saying. Thus it shouldn't be any surprise that actors have a nice headstart when a high position needs to be filled.

    1. Re:Actors make good politicians by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the operative word here is "good".

  35. ob HHGttG by fermion · · Score: 1
    And all dared to brave unknown terrors, to do mighty deeds, to boldly split infinitives that no man had split before - and thus was the Empire forged."

    If Shatner has any government post in Canada, I think the US north better stop whining about how we need to build a fence down south and start worrying about how we can reinforce the longest previously unprotected border in the world.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  36. Re:Is it just me or is Slashdot totally broken tod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only have it in FF, in C it works just fine (both on OSX)....

  37. Powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GG isn't powerless, it is the only person who has the power to open and close Parliament. Just ask Harper, he loves asking them to do it too.

  38. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Slashdot will stop trolling us when we stop biting.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  39. might shatner boldly lead canada ? by Atreide · · Score: 1

    "might shatner boldly lead canada ?"

    I thought Picard was bold, not Kirk.

    --
    The world belongs to those who get up early. - I'm far from being the king of Earth then :-(
    1. Re:might shatner boldly lead canada ? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I thought Picard was bold, not Kirk.

      And a Knight.

  40. No... And it's 'Governor General' Not 'Governor' by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is very old news in Canada. And no he won't. He doesn't even want the job, and the government is not considering him.

    And it is "Governor General" not governor. It is an appointed position akin to say the most ceremonial presidential position in some republics. That is, before a law can come into effect it must be signed off by the GG. It is called Royal Assent. The GG represents the Queen of Canada (Elizabeth II) in Canada, and the monarch of the constitutional monarchy must approve all laws before they can come into effect. However, the GG by tradition always gives Royal Assent at the request of the Prime Minister. However most people don't realize that the GG doesn't HAVE to sign. It is a form of check or balance in the system. Of course this would likely never happen except in the rarest of circumstance.

    Royal Assent must also be given in England as well before a law created in Parliament can go into effect. Of course in their case, the Queen signs it herself.

    Before the 20th century, it was more common for the monarch to be able to withhold Royal Assent than today (less political repercussions back then). It is this ability to withhold Royal Assent that lent itself to the American Presidential Veto.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  41. Re:Is it just me or is Slashdot totally broken tod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well it appears someone's moderation is working. Must be one of those folks who makes posts on game forums like "It works fine for me. Get a new CPU and video card. Hurr hurr."

  42. Not very comparable by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    The governor of California has quite a bit more power over his "subjects" than the governor general of Canada has over his. The governor of California is an executive, the governor general of Canada is a figurehead who stands in for the crown when they are unavailable for ceremonies.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  43. It's all acting now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bad science (fiction?) at it's darkest hour. Better days ahead, as it was (really) written/meant to be. See you there?

  44. Say what you like about Shatner by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    But yesterday, you didn't even know that Canukistan had a "Governor General", and today you're debating the merits of the candidates, just because some random intartubes nobody started a Facebook page with Shatner's name on it.

    What I say about Shatner is that the the strong-greaved Achaians and the spear-Danes of old may be gone, but a God walks amongst us still and he wants to make love to the mountain.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Say what you like about Shatner by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      That's going to be in my head all day now, TYVM.

      --

      You are not the customer.

  45. I'm guessing that you are American? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Informative

    (Hum, she's called Khan but looks like Uhura... conflict!)

    *extends hand* - Denny Crane.

    *Sigh* The lady is our current Governor General you insensitive clod.

    The man is Kahn.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:I'm guessing that you are American? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Whoops, you are of course right. Be more awake next time I guess.

    2. Re:I'm guessing that you are American? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      *Sigh* The extended hand while pronouncing the name Denny Crane trumps all logic.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  46. Interesting premise by ausrob · · Score: 1

    ..but won't he hijack Ottawa and eventually get demoted?

  47. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    ...suppose there was a group "I don't want our troops overseas" that had say... 3 Million + members. Think that might send a message?

    A message that 1% of the US population supports something? I don't think that would be a very meaningful message.

  48. Shatner is a shallow powderpuff, true by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    however, you are forgetting that the GG is a shallow powderpuff position

    therefore, give the shallow powderpuff person the shallow powderpuff position, and give the serious meaningful people you list serious meaningful positions

    it would be insulting, as you say, to give a shallow powderpuff a serious meaningful position in spite of other serious meaningful candidates

    but it is equally insulting to give a serious meaningful candidate a shallow powderpuff position

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Shatner is a shallow powderpuff, true by ultranova · · Score: 2, Funny

      Powderpuff is just a single letter away from Powerpuff. If someone wants a powderpuff position, then maybe they know something you don't. For example, the Communist Party of good old Soviet Russia should really had thought more about who they appointed as a secretary...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Shatner is a shallow powderpuff, true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Powderpuff is just a single letter away from Powerpuff. If someone wants a powderpuff position, then maybe they know something you don't.

      Just think of the children!

  49. Seems to me by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I guickly perused two wikipedia articles: one on Shatner and the other on Schwarzenegger. Shatner has a formal education at a the respectable McGill University whereas Schwarzenegger's education beyond high school is a bit murky. Arnold is well known for his philandering, his get tough on crime politics, and his pro death penalty stance. Arnold's lack of higher education and narcicisstic personality made him a poor choice for representing the will of the people but instead wanting to impose his own will. Arguably, Schwarzenegger is responsible for the veritable demise of the middle class in California. California is a prime example of the goal of the GOP to destroy the middle class. In California, you're rich or poor. William Shatner, however, might make a good Governor as he is well educated as well as honestly civic minded.

    1. Re:Seems to me by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      "Arguably, Schwarzenegger is responsible for the veritable demise of the middle class in California. "

      As a Californian, I'll take that argument. You give the office way more power than it has. I would suggest the legislature, through which the Governor must pass all legislation, has done more to harm the middle class than anything Muscleman could do. They have driven all business out and welcomed migrants and illegals with open arms, using our money to give them all manner of free programs, licenses, housing, medical, education, you name it, I wouldn't put a bet on anything they haven't given out using my money to illegal aliens. The only thing Arnold really got done was repealing that ridiculous triple rise on car registration Wilson wanted. After that he's been stymied by everything he's wanted to get done by the Leg. As soon as I am able I'm leaving the state myself, its ridiculous. Arnold had very little to do with it. You need to know what the hell you're talking about before you open your mouth.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    2. Re:Seems to me by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. California is fucked because of the legislature, not Arnold.

  50. $#*! My Governor Says by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    This thread is now about the governor of Canada saying funny $#*!.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  51. His Five-Year Mission... by nicodoggie · · Score: 1

    ... To Boldly Go Where No Ham Has Gone Before...

  52. Places other than California? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    You mean like Washington DC?

  53. Re:Is it just me or is Slashdot totally broken tod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same. They must be rolling out Slashdot HTML5 Edition after the great success of Slashdot 2.0

  54. Highest Positions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Governor General is an essentially powerless PR position.

  55. Re:As a Canadian - I thought that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being a dick was a requirement for higher public office.

  56. Shatner is at least bilingual by rsborg · · Score: 1
    Correct. He is listed as a "fluent french speaker"

    William Shatner est un acteur canadien, né le 22 mars 1931 à Montréal, au Canada. Il est anglophone mais parle couramment le français. Il s'est révélé au grand public dans le rôle du capitaine James T. Kirk, dans la série télévisée Star Trek.

    Translated for the google-lazy:

    William Shatner is a Canadian actor born March 22 1931 in Montréal, Canada. He is an english speaker but is fluent in french. His breakout role was as Captain James T. Kirk in the television series Star Trek

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  57. Old news that isn't by sykobabul · · Score: 1

    First of all, this references an article that is 2 months old. Since that time, Shat and officials in the Canadian government have confirmed that Bill isn't being considered for the post of Governor General.

    Second, Shatner was never on a list, short or otherwise. This whole thing came about as a result of a Facebook group nominating him for GG.

    It wasn't going to happen back in April, and it isn't going to happen now. Which is kind of a shame. I would have loved to hear Capt Kirk reading the throne speech.

  58. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco, representative of all the editors I suppose, is being irresponsible

    Now I know you're new here!

    Seriously, this is SOP. Learn to love it or learn to be disappointed.

    Well in this case CmdrTaco's headline and spin were irresponsible because we know from past experience he can do a better editorial job. If instead this was kdawson, it would be understandable because we really cannot expect better from him.

  59. Glorified State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Governor is about right as Canada has less people than California. Pretty much a glorified state anyways. Shatner should be able to handle that.

  60. aren't canadians ashamed of that? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i don't understand a country where the figurehead of a FOREIGN country has some sort influence, even if symbolic. and even appears, still, on your money. of course i understand the history, but aren't canadians ashamed of the fact that "canadian" doesn't have much meaning, in the end, because it's really "british" identity that seems to matter?

    i mean if i were canadian, i would want to be proud of being canadian, and being proud of a national identity should naturally preclude any suggestion of your national identity being secondary to someone else's identity. either call yourselves british instead, or completely sever this submissive colonial arrangement, even if just symbolic

    it just doesn't speak highly of a national identity to be so watered down and subservient of someone else's national identity, on another continent

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:aren't canadians ashamed of that? by tonywong · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're not Canadian so you don't understand it.

      Didn't have revolution and didn't need one to become a country. Don't need to shoot other people to be proud of your country.

    2. Re:aren't canadians ashamed of that? by horigath · · Score: 1

      i don't understand a country where the figurehead of a FOREIGN country has some sort influence, even if symbolic. and even appears, still, on your money.

      The Queen of Canada appears on our money, not simply the Queen of England nor the Queen of any other commonwealth country—although these are all the same person.

      Over the 20th century various Canadian Governments made great efforts to separate themselves from a perceived role hierarchically below Britain, most notably in the Statute of Westminister of 1931 and the 1982 patriation of the constitution. Since the 1982 Constitution Act, the Queen is not permitted to be advised by any government other than that of Canada. When in Canada or acting internationally on Canada's behalf her expenses are paid by Canada's government. There is no Canadian law stating that the Queen must be the same as that of England or any other commonwealth realm, only an agreement says that commonwealth countries will not unilaterally change their succession.

    3. Re:aren't canadians ashamed of that? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      i mean if i were canadian, i would want to be proud of being canadian, and being proud of a national identity should naturally preclude any suggestion of your national identity being secondary to someone else's identity. either call yourselves british instead, or completely sever this submissive colonial arrangement, even if just symbolic

      You're misunderstanding the role of the Queen. Elizabeth Windsor is the Queen of Canada. The fact that she is also the queen of another country (actually, several other countries) is irrelevant. As the appointed monarch, she abides by our wishes, not the other way around. The rules of succession of the crown of Canada are what *we* set them out to be. Granted, they are by treaty identical to other commonwealth nations and Great Britian's, but they don't have to be. We are in no way subjects of Britain, nor of its Queen.

      Having said that, there are a great number of Canadians who wish to do away with the monarchy altogether (although I think a great many of these people don't understand the distinction between Queen of Canada vs Queen of Great Britain either). However, that would be like trying to remove the Presidency from the US. It would require a complete rewrite of Canadian Law and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:aren't canadians ashamed of that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It s CTS is he is trolling dickhead. dont bother responding to him.

      He is so incredibly stupid he thikns the US govt is better than those of Commonwealth countries, which unlike the US are civilised.

  61. doesn't this bother you? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i will assume you are proud of being canadian. but the queen is a person from another country

    so how is it possible to be proud of your national identity, when you are so subservient to another national identity

    it would seem to me, canadians should call themselves british, or completely cauterize this ridiculous anachronistic subservience to a foreign power

    in the end, it just means that being canadian doesn't mean very much at all. so if you want being canadian to MEAN something, then exert that identity by not allowing canadian identity to be a doormat for someone else's national identity, an ocean away

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:doesn't this bother you? by ahankinson · · Score: 1

      The Queen of England and The Queen of Canada are, legally, two separate persons. They are embodied in one person, Elizabeth II, but are distinct entities.

      The Queen of Canada can only be advised by Canadians on Canadian matters. I'd suggest reading this page for a little more enlightenment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Canada

    2. Re:doesn't this bother you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow I suppose the "defender of the faith" is yet another legal entity? 3 beings embodied by one is such a traditional number.

    3. Re:doesn't this bother you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i will assume you are proud of being canadian. but the queen is a person from another country

      Not true. She is the Queen of Canada. This status was formally recognized in law by Canada's Royal Style and Titles Act.

      The fact that the Queen doesn't regularly live in Canada is irrelvant to her status as Canada's head of state.
      The fact that the Queen is also the queen of other countries is irrelevant to her status as Canada's head of state.

      The people of Canada, through the democratic process of their elected representatives, have chosen on multiple occastions for Elizabeth II to be their queen and head of state.

      so how is it possible to be proud of your national identity, when you are so subservient to another national identity

      In case you didn't notice, the UK plays a great role in Canadian history. Much of Canadian law, policy, society and way of life is derived from the British experience (the same can be said for the USA).

      And frankly, Canadians don't feel the slightest bit subservient to the UK. If anything, they feel subservient to the USA.

      it would seem to me, canadians should call themselves british, or completely cauterize this ridiculous anachronistic subservience to a foreign power

      The people who live in Canada were once called British, but that hasn't been the case for a very long time.
      Canadians are not entitled to British passports (long ago, they were).
      Canadians are not entitled to live permanently in the UK (long ago, they were).

      There is no longer any link or control whatsoever in law between the government of the UK and Canada.

      The final link was severed in 1982 when the UK formally granted Canada the power to amend their constitution. Prior to that Canada had to ask the UK to amend Canada's constitution.

      Now, the monarch of Canada is Queen Elizabeth II. Coincidentally, she is also Queen of the UK. That is the only link.

      And, in Canada's constitutional monarchy, the Queen is a purely symbolic role with no real power. Much like the UK. So the link is tenous at best.

    4. Re:doesn't this bother you? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      It is easily possible CTS. We have the same system in au and it is excellent.

      It costs less than a president, and does not add another politician to the mix.

      The head of government makes all recommendations to the crown, and they are always accepted.

      This ensures that the head of the government is an elected person who has a majority
      in the lower house and can pass its legislation. I would prefer our system by far to the
      messy joke that is US politics.

      Personally I think patriotism is the silliest human emotion going around. The only thing it creates is war and jingoism.

      Thats why we comprehesively rejected becoming a republic like the US some years ago.

      What a pity the US does not have the benefits that flow from such a system.

  62. Other than Claifornia? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    I suppose the White House counts...

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  63. Sure he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a bad clown can lead the US then it is conceivable that a good actor could lead Canada.

    1. Re:Sure he can... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      And Shatner is a good actor?

  64. Harper by Deadplant · · Score: 1

    Holy hell my government is an embarrassment.

    It is time for proportional representation in this country.

  65. if there's nothing you'd fight for by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    then you don't stand for anything, you don't mean anything, and therefore you have no identity

    your identity comes from what is important to you. if its important to you, you must fight for it at some point, because your beliefs will be challenged in this world. if you do not fight for that identity, then it really isn't important to you, and really isn't your identity after all. this observation applies to every noble principle you imagine you stand for

    so apparently canadian means "vegetative growth of no importance". i don't believe that about canada. i'm merely informing you of the implications of your own words written above about what it means to be canadian

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:if there's nothing you'd fight for by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      your identity comes from what is important to you. if its important to you, you must fight for it at some point, because your beliefs will be challenged in this world

      Canadians have a long history of fighting for what we believe in. We have had troops in most major conflicts over the last 100 years (WWI, WWI, Korea), and we've had peace keeping soldiers in every place that the UN has ever needed them. We have people in Afghanistan, and have lost quite a few soldiers. We're not afraid to fight for what we believe in.

      We just don't define our national identity in a way that we understand, let alone in a way that makes sense to someone else. :-P

      In terms of the whole Queen thing, it's complicated, and really hard to explain. Some Canadians are of British descent and have historical attachments and fondness. Some are of French descent, and therefore resent the Queen as a symbol of subjugation. Depending on where in the country you live, there might be a particular ethnic tilt in the population since the late comers had to go further West, so in the middle you get a lot of Ukrainian descended people. By the time you get out to the left coast, you get a lot more Asians who have less historical investment in the monarchy and are probably somewhat indifferent. Of course, all of the above is grossly simplified. :-P

      We variously have people who want us to return to the monarchy, people who want to get rid of it altogether, and people who don't give a crap. Within my lifetime, we've "officially" gotten the reins to or own Constitution and the like.

      The Queen plays less of a role in our identities as Canadians and what that means than you think it might. It's both ever present (the money, and in the wording of government since everything is the "crown" or the "Queen"), and completely not there for the most part in that on a daily basis, I think about the Queen's relationship to us almost none at all.

      We just have a less clearly defined national identity than you might expect. And there's not really any one common thing you can point to and say "A Canadian is ".

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:if there's nothing you'd fight for by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I recall, the long, paper-strewn trail to independence for Canada started, along with the rise of Canadian nationalism, following their victory over the United States during the War of 1812 (repelling the US invasion of what was, at the time, British territory, and starting to think, "Hey, this is OUR land."). Your comments about them never having fought for what's important to them shows the kind of historical ignorance that suggests you probably aren't even aware of the fact that the USA lost the War of 1812. Ah well...

      In any case, your logic is utter fail, even if the false "facts" you based it on were true. It can be argued that one has to be willing to fight for the principles, and one doesn't know for sure if they are unless they have, but your statement that a nation must have actually done so at some point is bizarre and absurd.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  66. Queen of Canada? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you mean like i'm the King of Antarctica?

    the woman lives in england, and owes her significance and identity to british history. how or why you believe this should have anything to do with being canadian is something i truly don't understand, unless it is your intention to say that "canadian" has no validity as a true national identity

    call yourself british, or completely sever any subservience to a foreign power. i don't demand this as some random troll on the internet. i demand this in the interest of logical coherence about what a national identity is suppose to mean. i don't get to say i'm american, and walk around with the king of france on my money. then i am some sort of frenchman

    national identity is something you can't invest pride in unless it is a truly unique identity

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Queen of Canada? by ahankinson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're not listening.

      The Queen of Canada isn't British, she's Canadian. She can only be advised by Canadians on Canadian matters. She is a completely separate legal person from the British Queen, or the Australian Queen, or the Queen of any other commonwealth country. In fact, we would be in just as much right to call ourselves "Australian" as we would "British."

      The Brits could oust their Monarchy tomorrow and we would still have a Queen. And maybe I'm just strange, but I think of a "national identity" as being a shared experience with other people that live in the same arbitrary geographical grouping as I do, not by who the current leader-du-jour is. You don't call yourself an "American" when the Republicans are in power, and then something else when the Democrats are.

    2. Re:Queen of Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't call yourself an "American" when the Republicans are in power, and then something else when the Democrats are.

      Although it's common for people to call each other "un-American" when one party is in power.

  67. Re:The Commonwealth by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    Canada is part of the Commonwealth of Nations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations), in general we are a happy member of this organization. The Queen is the titular head of the Commonwealth and thus of Canada. Her Governor General is her representative here in Canada. While largely ceremonial, the position does carry some political power and responsibility. The Commonwealth is a friendly relation between its member countries, celebrated in events like the Commonwealth Games (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_Games).

    The thing is we Canadians are in large part, quite proud of this relationship. If the US hadn't had its revolution, you would likely be a member as well. We acknowledge our British political heritage quite openly, and since there was never an antagonistic relationship between Canada and Britain, its not a big issue. Oh, sure there are Canadians who do not support this relationship - in fact most of one of our provinces likely feels that way (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec - but then Quebec insists on treating itself like a sovereign nation in many regards anyways. Its Provincial Assembly is called the National Assembly for instance. It still has a Lieutenant Governor representing the Queen though, just as do the rest of the Provinces).

    We have a strong British heritage here in Canada, reflected in English being one of the official languages (the other being French, since we have a large francophone community centered in but not limited to Quebec), our system of government (Parliamentary Democracy), our legal system etc. Its hardly a hardship to acknowledge that relationship proudly. Canada is of course highly multi-cultural, and in general quite supportive of minorities (our treatment of the native population aside. We have done them no favours whatsoever in my opinion, and still do them a grave disservice).

    Canada has come to the defense of Britain during both World Wars. There is a long history of military association with Britain. Many of our units with a longstanding heritage, owe their origins to British units raised here before we became an independent nation. When I joined the Canadian Armed Forces, I swore my oath to support "The Queen and all her heirs and successors in perpetuity" quite happily and seriously. Being Canadian - at least to me - means being proud of our relationship with Britain and the rest of the commonwealth, and that relationship in no way infringes on what it means to be Canadian, rather it enhances it.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  68. Star Trek had better options by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

    Shatner for GG? He's not even the best option from the Star Trek cast!

    James Montgomery "Jimmy" Doohan (Scotty!) would've been a far better GG. At least he was a member of the Royal Canadian Artillery. He was one of the soldiers storming the beach at the invasion of Normandy at Juno Beach on D-Day. (Have you seen 'Saving Private Ryan'? Well, Scotty was one of those soldiers. And he survived, despite being shot six times.) Now, that's a man I could respect as Governor General. And if Canada ran into trouble, we could always count on him "giving all he's got".

    We'll never forget you, Jimmy.

  69. Great Deals.. by MTTECHYBOY · · Score: 1

    Hmmm - so maybe Canada would start getting Great deals on Negotiated Hotel rates??

  70. Re:Dallaire vs Shatner by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    While I like William Shatner generally, and I don't disparage him for his - shall we say unique - acting style on Star Trek, I agree that Romeo Dallaire would be a far better choice as the next Governor General for Canada. (Anyone who wants to get a feel for Dallaire might do well to watch Shake Hands with the Devil (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0472562/), an excellent movie (Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaHAXnOGj9k) about the situation he faced in Rwanda during the genocide there. Likewise of course the book it was based on, written by Dallaire himself.

    All in all he is a major Canadian hero in my opinion, and a perfect choice for when Michelle Jean leaves her office.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  71. Harper-gate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Governor General has power in a minority. The current one basically does exactly what the prime minister wants and basically shuts down the parliament at every opportunity that Harper finds it "inconvenient". It already happened twice.

    I guess we'll just have to see if current GG will prorogue parliament when the current bill comes in from the G8 & G20. Americans spent about $18 million on such a meeting. Harper's "fiscal conservatives" have *wasted* 1000+ million. How the fuck do you spend $100,000,000+ on office space and $1,000,000,000 on "security" for a 2-3 day meeting???????? That's enough money to *build an office tower* AND *hire entire Canadian army* and still have money left over.

    Shiwinigate was one thing, but this is incomprehensible. People should go to jail for this waste.

    1. Re:Harper-gate by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      "Governor General has power in a minority. The current one basically does exactly what the prime minister wants and basically shuts down the parliament at every opportunity that Harper finds it "inconvenient". It already happened twice."

      Of course the GG prorogues parliament when the Prime Minister asks. That's how the 'constitution' works. Just as the Queen does what the British Prime Minister says. It's how the British constitutional settlement worked out, and Canada inherited it. It's mad as hell, but it keeps the tourists happy. The Queen, or Queen's representative, does not actually exercise discretionary power, in return for which she gets to still be the Queen. It's fairly simple in practice, though ridiculous in theory.

      (Now, the really interesting thing would've been to see what happened if the NDP/Liberal coalition deal had actually happened, because constitutionally it would've been the GG's decision whether or not to allow them to form a government, and there's no other authority to refer to, or precedent to follow. But it didn't. Ah, well.)

  72. Re:my ancestors were british colonists in new engl by AdamWill · · Score: 1

    "my blood has shed for your cowardice in not serving the good cause of throwing off the colonial yolk."

    that's quite possibly the funniest thing I've read all year.

  73. shhhh by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i'm trolling canadians, this is a delicate trap. i'm hoping a canuck will come flipping out and screaming "Rule, Britannia!" a nice proper internet meltdown

    so don't harsh my troll dude. keep it serious and indignant. i'm certain i can troll a canadian well here. its easy: they always have a chip on their shoulder about their national identity in relation to the usa. pick at it and they always flip out

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:shhhh by treeves · · Score: 1

      I think GP was trying to point out that you have egg (yolk) on your face.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  74. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, Leonard Cohen is someone even I could get behind for the GG position. Too bad, I'm not Canadian.

  75. Re:You Do Realize You Are Reporting on a Facebook by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    Are persons on the "Short List" actually short?

  76. Why is the Queen of England by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Queen of Canada too? I mean I know they only became a real country in the 80's but you'd think they'd get their own Queen when that happened.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:Why is the Queen of England by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Because it's a commonwealth realm, along with another 15 countries (including the UK).

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    2. Re:Why is the Queen of England by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply. (Since it convinced me to look it up.) I didn't realize so many of the commonwealth nations kept her on as queen. (The only one I can find that she isn't a queen of is India but there's probably others.) I guess they still like to have some ties to the UK.

      --
      Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    3. Re:Why is the Queen of England by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      33 of the nations in the Commonwealth of Nations are republics and four are monarchies with their own monarchs.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  77. Other than California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, sometimes actors can even become President of the United States, which is outside California

  78. Nice try, America by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    It seems that acting can lead to the highest offices in places other than California

    Ummm... Ronald Regan?

  79. That's not what the Commonwealth is anymore by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    Canada is part of the Commonwealth of Nations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations), in general we are a happy member of this organization. The Queen is the titular head of the Commonwealth and thus of Canada.

    Being head of the Commonwealth does not make her the head of every country that is a Commonwealth member. Plenty of Commonwealth countries have dumped monarchism, whether on independence or as a subsequent reform.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  80. Impossible by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    Panera makes yummy bread and pastries, and there's free wifi there! They'd totally want one.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  81. I, for one, welcome our TJ Hooker overlord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our TJ Hooker overlord!

  82. Re:Marooned eternity, in the center of a dead coun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teeeeetttssssuuuuuuuooooooooooooo!!

  83. Re:Marooned eternity, in the center of a dead coun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TETSUUUUUOOOOOOO!!!!!

  84. Australian GG's use their power by ferret4 · · Score: 1

    No power? Australia, 1975: Prime Minister Gough Whitlam is dismissed by Governor-General Sir John Kerr. Kerr then appoints the *Leader of the Opposition* Malcolm Fraser as temporary Prime Minister. Malcolm Fraser retains the position of Prime Minister for nearly 8 years.

  85. It seems that acting can lead to ...California by jerzee · · Score: 1

    Poking fun at California for having Schwarzenegger, I guess no one has ever heard of Jesse Ventura or maybe an even more obscure actor have just as a trivial role in history, Ronald Reagan.

  86. Re:The Commonwealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Queen is the titular head of the Commonwealth and thus of Canada.

    No. Elizabeth II is the titular head of the Commonwealth and Queen of Canada. They are separate titles and there is no requirement that they be the same. See London Declaration and Statute of Westminster 1931. They are separate positions that, for now, are held by the same person (and probably will be in the future). Neither position is dependent on the other.

  87. As an Australian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were not kicked out. We kind of got our own apartment, but we still go running home to Mommy quite a bit. Ocassionally we'll pretend to be all republican and shit, but the next day it'll be Queen's Birthday and we'll thow a raw prawn on the barbie in Mommy's name.

  88. Pisces is in Jupiter, let's nuke Russia! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    According to some accounts it was Nancy's astrologer's hand.

    Pisces is in Jupiter and the moon is in its rising quarter. An ideal time for launching nucular missiles at the godless commies!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  89. I'm dead Jim... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    I once saw an interview with bones where he said he wanted the words "I'm dead Jim" engraved on his grave stone.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  90. Canadian Governe General by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Stop Joking that Shatner qualifies. He may be a Canadian by birth, but not by mindset. His parents were members of our Synagogue, and are buried in the local cemetery. Never heard of William being in town.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  91. one thing never mentioned.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shatner is not a political novice. he comes from a family with a long history of hands on experiance with government. several of his family members have served canada in parlimanet, and several others have represented canada internationally, including terms as ambasador to indonesia, thailand, and more importantly china. Bill has been know to keep his personal life seperate from his public life. Heck, i'm a fifth cousin and i got a card from him on my bar mitzvah. -posted anon to comply with family wishes