Slashdot Mirror


Apple Launches New Magical Trackpad, 12 Core Macs

theappwhisperer writes "The Magic Trackpad is basically a larger version of the MacBook Pro touchpad, with 80% more surface area for all your swiping and pinching. The entire surface acts as a button, so it's also a possible mouse replacement. And all of the expected gestures are here: two-finger scrolling, pinch to zoom, fingertip rotation, and three- and four-finger swipes. You can enable and disable gestures at your discretion from System Preferences." They also launched 12-core Mac Pros coming in August.

432 comments

  1. I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of these by alta · · Score: 4, Funny

    works out great for me, I get a new computer and get one of those damn kids out of my hair.

    Any takers? SHould I put them on craigslist or ebay?

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  2. More magic? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, I find this "magic" marketing strategy to be a complete turnoff.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:More magic? by ari_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More of a turn-off than i-everything? Honestly, if you're going to pick an Apple product naming issue to complain about, 'magic' is always going to be striving for the silver medal.

    2. Re:More magic? by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      Should this device be filed under iMagic Trackpad or Magic iTrackpad?

    3. Re:More magic? by mini+me · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't have to make love to the product. If the product is useful to you, buy it. If not, do not buy it. Who cares what marketing has to say?

    4. Re:More magic? by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Honestly, I find this "magic" marketing strategy to be a complete turnoff.

      Well, I guess Steve Jobs learned his lesson with "really cool engineering". What else is left besides "magic"?

      "Combining the really cool engineering of the iPhone 4, and the magic of the new iMac; I am pleased to announce to the world the iAlchemist. Yes that's right folks, as long as you don't hold it the wrong way, your iAlchemist can use the power of alchemy to turn lead into gold!"

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    5. Re:More magic? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You don't have to make love to the product.

      You would if my app wasn't rejected.

    6. Re:More magic? by vlm · · Score: 1

      your iAlchemist can use the power of alchemy to turn lead into gold!

      Uh, we're lead free solder here, thank you.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:More magic? by Sturm · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least they didn't call it,

      iMagic.

    8. Re:More magic? by poetmatt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They call it the iProselytize.

    9. Re:More magic? by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 2, Funny

      your iAlchemist can use the power of alchemy to turn lead into gold!

      Uh, we're lead free solder here, thank you.

      I'd be happy to redirect a barge full of toys en route from China to one of your local ports; for a nominal fee of course. :)

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    10. Re:More magic? by jgagnon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does a Fleshlight run iOS? I know it works with an ARM processor... ;)

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    11. Re:More magic? by StripedCow · · Score: 0, Troll

      How long until people will start yelling "abracadabra" at their iPads when they want to get a Flash-based website to properly work?

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    12. Re:More magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I find this "magic" marketing strategy to be a complete turnoff.

      If you don't buy something because of its name, then you are using the same logic as the people who do. You are allowing the name (or hype) to influence your decision. Forget the name and look at what Apple is doing... they are getting rid of the mouse as the primary human GUI interface and replacing it with a gesture based system. Plan on getting used to it, because in five years everyone else will have followed suit!

    13. Re:More magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for the iMagic to come out

    14. Re:More magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What for? I imagine Steve Jobs saying "You're holding it wrong!" while using an iOS Fleshlight...

    15. Re:More magic? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Magic? I would think that a 12-core Apple would be the result of nuclear testing, or toxic waste.

    16. Re:More magic? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't work when you let out the magic smoke....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:More magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is how you'll pay off the loans you took out to support your iHabit.

    18. Re:More magic? by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 3, Funny

      For the love of God, don't tell us anything about storage or capacity.

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    19. Re:More magic? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You don't have to make love to the product. If the product is useful to you, buy it. If not, do not buy it. Who cares what marketing has to say?

      I'd mod you up, but I've got to finish this project in GIMP and then text my boss on my Pixi.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    20. Re:More magic? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Honestly, I find this "magic" marketing strategy to be a complete turnoff.

      Agreed. I use the term magic when someone asks me how or why something I did worked, and it's complicated enough that I don't want to explain it. I say it's magic, we smile at each other, and each of us knows that it's complicated enough to avoid an explanation (if they say they really want to know, of course I'll explain it).

      I also use it when I have enough contempt for the person that I don't think they would understand even if I tried to explain it.

      So yeah, it's definitely a turn off when I see a company like Apple using it as a marketing strategy. It's like they assume we're stupid, and that's the only thing we can understand. But like someone else mentioned, I guess technical people are not Apple's target market. Sort of strange, but there it is.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    21. Re:More magic? by HermMunster · · Score: 2, Funny

      iFizzle. iFizzle. iFizzle. iFizzle. You begin casting iMagic. iTarget (iFanboi) succumbed to iMagic. iFizzle. iFizzle. iFizzle. You become better at iFizzle. iFizzle. iFizzle. You begin casting iMagic. iTarget (iNonFanboi) resisted iMagic. Try iMagic again after you reduce their reality distortion field shield with iMalosini.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    22. Re:More magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Apple invented the touchscreen now, did they? Damn that reality distortion field is strong.

    23. Re:More magic? by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 1

      Boy, I hope they don't ever release a new camera called the "Magic Eye."

      --
      Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
    24. Re:More magic? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Well there's no such things as magic, just sleight of hand or prestidigitation which means quick fingers. I guess it's an apt parallel with a multitouch system?

    25. Re:More magic? by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      It's like they assume we're stupid, and that's the only thing we can understand.

      Or perhaps somebody in Apple marketing just asked an engineer about the new zero-button mouse they were working on. "Never attribute to malice" and all that.

    26. Re:More magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I use the term magic when someone asks me how or why something I did worked, and it's complicated enough that I don't want to explain it. I say it's magic, we smile at each other, and each of us knows that it's complicated enough to avoid an explanation (if they say they really want to know, of course I'll explain it).

      I also use it when I have enough contempt for the person that I don't think they would understand even if I tried to explain it.

      So yeah, it's definitely a turn off when I see a company like Apple using it as a marketing strategy. It's like they assume we're stupid, and that's the only thing we can understand. But like someone else mentioned, I guess technical people are not Apple's target market. Sort of strange, but there it is.

      I'm sure you can understand the technology involved, but do you really want an explanation of how the trackpad works in the product name?

    27. Re:More magic? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I find this "magic" marketing strategy to be a complete turnoff.

      No, really, it's magic. Look closely: You see how the trackpad will only work with OS 10.6? Yet it's nothing more than a trackpad, same as the Macbooks have had for years? Brother, it takes magic to make that thing not work with OS 10.5, believe me. It's not a matter of just writing code and realizing, hey, this won't work with an earlier OS... no, it takes sorcery to make that happen. Possibly a pact with the very debbil hisself.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    28. Re:More magic? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Yeah I was sort of considering that also.. maybe the issue is that the people in Apple's marketing department are in fact too stupid to understand what their products are and how they work. Definitely a possibility.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    29. Re:More magic? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you can understand the technology involved, but do you really want an explanation of how the trackpad works in the product name?

      I realize that "Apple 6-inch Multitouch Trackpad" doesn't roll of the tongue like "Magic Trackpad", but it definitely sounds a lot less pretentious. I don't know how large the actual device is, but it sounds a lot like a Wacom tablet, except you use your fingers instead of a pen. This isn't exactly "magic", is it?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    30. Re:More magic? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I wonder if - like the magical antenna on the iPhone 4 - this also stops working when you touch it?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    31. Re:More magic? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      How long until people will start yelling "abracadabra" at their iPads when they want to get a Flash-based website to properly work?

      Such a dumb post... Any geek worth their salt would know that abracadabra is not on the approved list of magical incantations.

      Dweeb.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    32. Re:More magic? by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      They already have a Magic Mouse, is Magic Trackpad really that much of a stretch? I can think of worse names:
      Apple Trackpad - obvious choice, unimaginative
      Wonder Trackpad
      Amazing Trackpad
      Super Trackpad
      Ultra Trackpad
      iTrack
      Mac Track
      MyTrack
      eTrack
      Wacky Track ...
      ow!

  3. So... by skyride · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What exactly is the benefit of this over a conventional mouse?

    1. Re:So... by Nerdfest · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No desk space required ... but it will probably retain most of the disadvantages of other trackpads while adding a bit more usability.

    2. Re:So... by ari_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Huge multitouch surface. Two-finger scrolling on my Powerbook's trackpad makes it a useful machine for browsing the web without an external mouse attached. That said, my desktop is most likely always going to have an external mouse attached, so I don't know how much usability gain you get from it.

    3. Re:So... by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

      Scrolling should be a lot nicer. The only couple of things I miss from my MBP are the multitouch scrolling (drag two fingers around to scroll), and the way you could hold down two fingers and click the button to simulate a right click. I've been back using a normal PC touchpad for over a year now but I still like that better than having two trackpad buttons.

      A lot of games would still be better with a mouse though IMO, I guess because you use your wrist to control movement while your fingers are free for button control.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so just like a trackball, then?

    5. Re:So... by arivanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And enhance the biggest disadvantage of trackpads - RSI.

      I really do not want to think on how my hand will feel after 8-10h a day of pinching, zooming and rotating your finger on a touch surface. It is OK on a notebook or a phone once in a while. It will be an absolute ligament killer on a desktop when used in a work environment.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    6. Re:So... by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      No desk space required ... but it will probably retain most of the disadvantages of other trackpads while adding a bit more usability.

      My mouse only takes up as much room as my mouse pad. From what I have seen on TFA, my mouse pad is comparable in size to this device. Plus I use a wired mouse, so no batteries needed either. About the only benefit I can see is in multi-touch. But my normal operating paradigm doesn't need multi-touch.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    7. Re:So... by mini+me · · Score: 1

      Trackpads are more enjoyable to use under most circumstances.

    8. Re:So... by asukasoryu · · Score: 1

      I really do not want to think on how my hand will feel after 8-10h a day of pinching, zooming and rotating your finger on a touch surface. It is OK on a notebook or a phone once in a while. It will be an absolute ligament killer on a desktop when used in a work environment.

      The life of a porn star is tough.

      --
      There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
    9. Re:So... by Altus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here at work I am using one of these Apple touch surface mice. Its the nicest mouse I have used in a very long time. I love the 2D touch scrolling on it.

      I guess multi touch would be nice but I cant see this being better than what I have here for the work I do. Maybe for graphics and video work it would come in more handy.

      On the other hand this thing would be perfect as an input device for controlling my media sever from my coffee table.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    10. Re:So... by linhares · · Score: 1

      i respectfully disagree

    11. Re:So... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      My mouse only takes up as much room as my mouse pad. From what I have seen on TFA, my mouse pad is comparable in size to this device.

      Ah, but you see this device doesn't need to be used on your desk.

    12. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I haven't used a mouse in 6 months, laptop trackpad only. No indications of RSI and my hand and wrist actually feel better than when using a mouse. I for one have wanted a track pad off to the side instead of below my typing surface as it is a more natural movement for me.

      So now I can close my screen, use only my external monitor, and use a wireless keyboard and trackpad. No wires or moving parts on my desktop.

    13. Re:So... by wbo · · Score: 2, Informative

      For some reason many PC laptops ship with touchpads that are quite customizable but include customized drivers that disable much of the functionality and customization that the hardware normally supports.

      If your PC laptop has a touchpad made by Synaptics (which many do) you may be able to get multitouch scrolling by downloading the latest driver from here. Even if you have an older Synaptics device that doesn't support multitouch you should still be able to set up a "scroll zone" at the edges of the pad which allows you to scroll using a single finger. I have done this on many Dell and HP laptops and it works great.

    14. Re:So... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      neither do decent optical mice in my experiance.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:So... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I had a fairly persistent ache in the middle finger of my mouse hand from using the scroll wheel, back when I had a desktop. I've not had any discomfort from the trackpad on either of my Macs, and I really miss the two--dimensional scrolling support when I'm using any other pointing device. My trackpad predates the other gestures, but the two-finger scroll is incredibly useful.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:So... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Bragging rights. Also it has a button.

    17. Re:So... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      They do need to be used on a hard surface however, this can be used in your lap in in your bed, wherever you want it. It is its own surface.

    18. Re:So... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      are you insane?

      Mouse beats a trackpad in every way.

      Select a single pixle... mouse = easy trackpad = impossible.
      play a FPS... I'll own you hard on your trackpad.
      do a lot of pointer movement, photo retouching.... mouse or better yet a pen tablet uttery owns a trackpad....

      using only one hand while doing nothing but surfing the net.... Ok the trackpad wins there.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:So... by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      To simulate a right click, tap with two fingers.
      Much easier, but you may need to turn on the "tap using two fingers for secondary click" option in your trackpad properties..

    20. Re:So... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      When I'm using my laptop at home it lives on a stand, hooked up to an external mouse and keyboard. I use Photoshop a lot, and I quite quickly adapted to using my left hand on the trackpad for navigation and my right on the mouse for actual tool work. I imagine it'd work well with quite a few design programs.

      Niche as hell, sure, but it'd be enough to make me consider one. There's plenty of market out there for specialist input devices for video, audio and 3D work, so if this catches on in one of those markets then I'd say Apple are on to a decent cash cow.

    21. Re:So... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      In my experiance optical mice work just fine on clothing and beds.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:So... by mini+me · · Score: 1

      I accept that games are easier using a mouse, which is why I said most circumstances. I will also agree that a pen beats a touchpad for graphic manipulation, but we were not talking about pens.

      I'm not sure what problems you have with pixel manipulation. My Macbook Pro touchpad is fine in that regard. I assume this new touchpad behaves much the same way. Perhaps there are some touchpads of lesser quality out there that do not behave as well, but they are not really indicative of what is possible with touchpads anyway.

    23. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no practice on a trackpad, do you?

      FPS I'll give you, but single-pixel and photo work can be done on a quality trackapd just as easily as with a mouse. No, it's not natural, but neither is a mouse. Both require lots of practice for fine work.

    24. Re:So... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but without finger grease clogging the sensors, without the ball falling out and hitting the floor and breaking when you turn it upside down, etc. And good lucky finding a Bluetooth trackball.

      In fact, I couldn't even find a Bluetooth trackpad except for a weird combo keyboard/trackpad device that only works with Windows, a tiny micro-trackpad on the Interlink presenter remote, and a few full-size Bluetooth keyboards with built-in trackpads. This may be the first *usable* Bluetooth trackpad anybody has ever built, and since it was built by Apple, I can be pretty sure its Bluetooth implementation won't suck.

      I've been looking for this sort of device for the last half decade. As soon as I've read reviews to make sure it works, I'll be ordering one.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:So... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. What is multi-touch actually good for? It seems pretty gimmicky to me. And I can browse the web just fine with the track point on my T23. So, uh, big whoop.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    26. Re:So... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      For exceptionally small values of "work just fine" sure. If I'm in a pinch I'll use one on whatever is closest and it'll work. But I wouldn't want to lay in bed with an optical mouse to control a computer on the other side of the room..

    27. Re:So... by chrisxcr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What exactly is the benefit of this over a conventional mouse?

      For most of us there isn't much benefit over using a mouse. I think the real point of this thing is to train Mac users to use multitouch. Apple thinks multitouch is the next big thing in human-computer interaction and they are training us in baby steps to use it in progressively more complicated ways. If they change too quickly no one will be able to figure out all the various gestures and the touch idea will flop. First they added 2nd finger right click on the notebook trackpads then the iPhone touch UI, then added more gestures to trackpads again, then the iPad and now with this thing, multitouch for desktops. This is probably an intermediate step to something else. I don't know what the end result will look like but I'm guessing they know where they want to go and we're not there yet.

    28. Re:So... by deserttrail · · Score: 1

      Well, for me, the two-fingered scrolling is pretty awesome and I find it terribly obnoxious to use a laptop without it. It's very natural relative to the "scroll zone" on most trackpads.

      --
      Be civil to all; sociable to many; familiar with few; friend to one; enemy to none. --Benjamin Franklin
    29. Re:So... by shmlco · · Score: 2

      They needed this a couple of years ago. Too many OS X applications fail to recognize and support gestures.

      Why? Because they were only supported on the MacBooks. Why bother if half the Mac universe can't use them?

      Now Apple's desktops can finally catch up to the functionality that their notebooks have had for years.

      In fact, this really should be the DEFAULT option for iMacs, Mac minis, and Pros. Reply

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    30. Re:So... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      What exactly is the benefit of this over a conventional mouse?

      Probably none whatsoever. I have yet to see a touchscreen let alone a touchpad come anywhere close to being as usable as a mouse where space isn't a concern.

    31. Re:So... by Yert · · Score: 1

      The wired Razer mice that use a laser sensor (Lachesis, etc) track on damn near anything, including earth. I have used a Copperhead for gaming while seated on a couch, using the cushion next to me as my mousing surface, for hours. Being a wired mouse, there's no issue with charging it, and it's a 6 ft cable. I also have the sensitivity cranked all the way up on my mice, so even the DeathAdder I use here at work traverses a total of 2 inches across my desk to move the point from the right edge of my right monitor to the left edge of my left monitor on a dual-monitor setup (on polished wood, no mouse pad or whatnot.)

      I am interested in checking out the Magic Trackpad, but I don't see where I'll have any use for it at work; I'm almost certain I won't be able to use it at home, where my machine is usually running EvE or BF:BC2, lately. Although pinch-zoom for sniping might be neat...

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    32. Re:So... by somersault · · Score: 1

      No, one of my gfs had that option on, I hated it. I also hate single tap for left click, but if the whole pad is a giant button then that could work, two finger clicking included.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    33. Re:So... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I strongly prefer two-finger scrolling to scroll zones. The latter take away usable trackpad space and are much more prone to accidental activation than multitouch pads are.

    34. Re:So... by Draek · · Score: 1

      No, no they aren't. Not compared to a mouse, not compared to a trackpoint, not even compared to a keyboard.

      Hell, in my experience the easiest way to make someone learn how to navigate their OS with the keyboard is to take away their notebook's external mouse.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    35. Re:So... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Here's a question for you, as an Apple touch-surface mouse user. I presume your mouse is Bluetooth. How well does that work? I recently quit using my Microsoft Bluetooth mouse with my Power Mac because I got sick of its startup times - there would be anywhere from a full minute at the low end to five minutes at the high end of false starts (move the pointer an inch then stall for another 20 seconds, etc.) each time I started using it after a multi-hour absence (sleep, work, etc.). Is that a Microsoft issue or an Apple issue? Also, how long do your batteries on the mouse (and, if applicable, Bluetooth keyboard) last in normal usage?

    36. Re:So... by am+2k · · Score: 1

      So, how do you move backward in the browser window history? You could navigate the mouse cursor to the toolbar, far away from where you just clicked a link on a web page and try to aim at the back-button, or you could press some arcane key combination, where you have to move your hands away from the tracking device and then back, or you could just put down a second finger and swipe to the left. Which option is the easiest/fastest?

      How do you rotate or scale a picture? You could move your mouse to the toolbar and try to locate a button (if there is one there), you could navigate through the menu and try to remember whether you want CW or CCW rotation (same with a keyboard shortcut) / zoom in or out, or you could put down the thumb and just show what you want to do.

      The list goes on...

    37. Re:So... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well I'm running Linux but my touchpad does have the scroll areas at the edge. Haven't seen any options to use it as a multitouch pad unfortunately. I'm unsure if my MBP would work with multitouch under Ubuntu, haven't tried (I just use it as a server these days). I definitely prefer the two finger touch over edge scrolling.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    38. Re:So... by Altus · · Score: 1

      I was very apprehensive about the Bluetooth mouse, but I have to say, it has worked really well, it never seems to drop the connection and it never needs to be re-paired with the computer. I haven't noticed the mouse jumping around or any issues on sleep/wake. If I turn it off and on there is a short lag (in seconds) before the mac detects it but as soon as I get the "Connected" message the mouse is responsive.

      Battery wise, I leave it on all the time because I never remember to turn it off at the end of the day. I have been working here 4 months and I have replaced the batteries 3 times but one of those times was earlier this week so it was pretty close to 2 months per battery change (standard alkaline battery). My interaction with the computer is fairly keyboard heavy so I don't know if the batteries die more quickly if you use it more. I suspect you would do a lot better if you remember to turn your mouse off, but I cant really be bothered.

      I also have a bluetooth keyboard from apple which has never needed a battery change and works like a champ (except its not an extended keyboard).

      Overall my experience with Apples bluetooth accessories has been excellent, but for desktop use, if I could get a wired version of this mouse, I would probably go for that. I don't find wireless to be worth the battery cost when im this close to my computer.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    39. Re:So... by mini+me · · Score: 1

      I do Photoshop work with the touchpad all of the time. I prefer it over using a mouse. Though a pen is most prefered for freehand drawing. Moving the pointer to where you want it to go is not nearly as difficult as you are making it sound.

    40. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The life of a porn star is hard .

      FTFY

    41. Re:So... by Idbar · · Score: 1

      So they are finally starting to sell re-branded fingerworks devices.

    42. Re:So... by lisany · · Score: 1

      So, how do you move backward in the browser window history? *lots of mouse stuff*

      I use z to navigate backwards and x to move forwards. Opera has had these keymappings available for years and I can't begin to imagine how much strain on my wrists they have saved. Hands are usually on the keyboard anyways, why not use them?

    43. Re:So... by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Hmm I never rest any hand on the keyboard when I'm browsing... Don't need it, since all can be done with a swipe of one or two fingers :)

    44. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And enhance the biggest disadvantage of trackpads - RSI.

      I really do not want to think on how my hand will feel after 8-10h a day of pinching, zooming and rotating your finger on a touch surface.

      My experience is with heavy usage of a MacBook Pro. Based on the way you actually use it, 90% of what you do is gently tapping or dragging one finger around, and another maybe 9% is scrolling with two fingers together, so 8 hours a day feels fine. (Well, I have a crick in my neck, but it's a laptop.) The occasional pinch or rotate doesn't require any awkward hand positions that I can see.

      It does help, though, to turn on tap-to-click and double-tap to drag. It's a bear to drag items by physically pressing the button.

    45. Re:So... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So, how do you move backward in the browser window history?

      Context menu.

      How do you rotate or scale a picture?

      Why would I rotate or scale a picture in a web browser?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    46. Re:So... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      How did you post this comment without using the keyboard?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    47. Re:So... by am+2k · · Score: 1

      You're using your computer only for a web browser?

    48. Re:So... by am+2k · · Score: 1

      iPad :) There is no keyboard.

    49. Re:So... by profplump · · Score: 1

      The gestures are handy. I use a trackball at my desktop, which has lots of buttons and doesn't require any arm movement or desk space, but I sometimes miss the gestures I can make on my laptop's trackpad, and I've been wanting a trackpad for my desktop for some time (in addition to the trackball, not as a replacement).

      I'm not sure if I want one for $70, but I do want one. Does anybody know of a similar product that isn't so fraking expensive? I'm willing to get something smaller and I'm indifferent about Bluetooth, but I haven't been able to find anything that supports the sort of multi-finger gestures I want to use. Any suggestions?

    50. Re:So... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information. The Microsoft mouse was the only wireless mouse I've ever used that didn't feel slightly laggy in its response. Its only flaws were the interminable wake-up process and the charger base not making a good connection with the mouse, which led me to just use alkaline batteries rather than trying to get it to recharge. I'm currently thinking about a new iMac (which wasn't really mentioned in this article, but they got some great updates today, too) and it helps to know what people think of the standard peripherals.

    51. Re:So... by klui · · Score: 1

      No. A touchpad/trackball is much better than mice because you can always use your other hands/fingers or both hands to do pinching. A mouse normally requires you to use a specific finger for clicking so it embodies RSI--repetitive motion forced on specific parts of the body.

    52. Re:So... by HBoar · · Score: 1

      Gimmickry. That's about it as far as I can see, the touch pad on the macbook pros is horrible to use anyway. Well, it's fine until you want to use the 'click anywhere' bit, which very quickly leads to sore hands. Not sure why, perhaps it has to do with the force required to click (they are quite stiff). Very hard to do a good fast double click with them too, I always feel like a newbie using them.

    53. Re:So... by HBoar · · Score: 1

      Exactly. After half an hour of using my GFs macbook pro my hand starts cramping up -- and I'm only 26!!

    54. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My tongue cramps up after half an hour of licking your girlfriend's button.

    55. Re:So... by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      I've been using a MacBook Pro as my work machine for the past year, and I feel less stress on the hand than when I was using a regular mouse.

      I attribute this mainly to the fact that I'm not clicking/scrolling in exactly the same way every time (using two finger scrolling, tap-to-left-click, and two finger tap-to-right-click) , since I can do it anywhere on the pad. It's much better than a regular mouse, and I'm starting to prefer it even to a trackball.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    56. Re:So... by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      I don't understand? What is this internet good for? It seems pretty gimmicky to me. And I can read the news in a newspaper. So, uh, big whoop.

      In all seriousness I really like multi-touch. In a way it doesn't make a huge difference - you can't really do anything with it that you can't with a normal mouse - but it cuts down on many key combinations/mouse movements that you don't realise how often you use until you've used a multi-touch touchpad for an extended period and then try and use a normal touchpad/mouse. It just makes things smoother and easier.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    57. Re:So... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not sure I notice lag as much as the next guy, I don't do a lot of twitch gaming or precise mouse work. Before you buy try to hit up an apple store if you can and see if you can try one out. I don't know if they have them out with the machines but I bet someone could pull one out for you.

      Then again, if you are going to get one with the iMac you want anyway, you may as well give it a shot before replacing it with an aftermarket mouse.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    58. Re:So... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      So, how do you move backward in the browser window history?

      Click one of the the two mouse buttons under my thumb, some way I've been doing it for a decade or so now.

      How do you rotate or scale a picture?

      I'm actually trying to remember the last time I ever rotated a picture and I really can't. As for scaling, a mouse wheel is far superior than the gestures, based on my experiences with the iPhone and iPad.

      I noticed that they've implemented the same usability abortion as the MacBooks and made the whole thing a button, too, thus turning any sort of click-drag interaction into a frustrating and painful experience.

  4. Cores do not equal power by Robotron23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As others have noted here in the past, the number of processing cores do not a powerful computer make. A lot of the time with both laptops and PCs the cores are entirely unused. You could get a finely made quad-core which is standard fare nowadays, and have it work much faster than a six or dozen core system like these Mac pros.

    Since processing is largely a duopoly of AMD and Intel, both have been guilty of marketing their hardware by highlighting the core numbers. Yet it's the architecture, pressure under strain, among other things that actually equate to performance.

    1. Re:Cores do not equal power by Alakaboo · · Score: 3, Informative

      All but the highest-end iMac are dual-core. The lowest-end Mac Pro is quad-core. If someone is going to drop $5K+ on a Mac Pro with 12 cores, they either have money to throw around or they know what they're doing.

    2. Re:Cores do not equal power by DavidpFitz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As others have noted here in the past, the number of processing cores do not a powerful computer make.

      For sure; but this is aimed at people who are would be rendering video on their desktop or other CPU heavy creative tasks (e.g. Photoshop on massively high resolution images).

      This isn't aimed at your average Mac user, or even your 'power-user' - it's aimed at people who need huge amounts of CPU every now and then.

    3. Re:Cores do not equal power by ironring2006 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you think you can get by just fine on just a quad-core, then you're not the target market. Simple as that. I get by just fine on my entry level MacMini. There won't be a huge volume of sales of the 12 core systems, but there exists a market (however relatively small) that needs every bit of computing power they can get. They're also the ones willing to invest in the software architechture to get the most out of the hardware.

    4. Re:Cores do not equal power by yumyum · · Score: 3, Informative

      A lot of the time with both laptops and PCs the cores are entirely unused.

      So? That is more a problem of application programmers than hardware designers.

      Since processing is largely a duopoly of AMD and Intel, both have been guilty of marketing their hardware by highlighting the core numbers.

      This does not even make sense. Why shouldn't a company tout the fact that they have more cores on a chip than before? And this is Apple's advertising anyway, not AMD/Intel. The price alone would keep most people from buying the high-end, as it always has. However, for my work in radar signal processing using heavily-threaded applications, this machine would be a great addition to my desktop since I would no longer have to run my signal processing streams distributed over several hosts; one host could do the job just fine.

    5. Re:Cores do not equal power by grub · · Score: 3, Interesting


      I don't think money is much of an issue for the target market. 12 core machines are aimed at the professional market who will use these devices to make money through rendering and other things lots-o-cores excel at.

      That's why they're using Xeons, I think these one are around $900-$1K per.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another example would be audio recording/editing where there could be any number of effects prosescors running in software over a couple dozen tracks, all expected to respond in real time.

      There's a reason logic pro has the capability of running in a cluster.

    7. Re:Cores do not equal power by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It depends on how you define "power." If it's in terms of the number of calculations per second the computer is capable of doing, then of course more cores equals more power. The question is whether you're going to be running software that uses that power. The sterotypical "I just want to surf the web and read e-mail" low-end user isn't going to, but then, that guy isn't in the target market for this machine.

      In bioinformatics, many of the problem we work on are "embarrassingly parallel," and I can guarantee you that I'd have no problem keeping all 12 cores on this machine busy. But scientists are a tiny niche market, of course. Presumably the new Mac Pro is mainly being pitched, as previous machines in the lines have been, to graphics and video pros. Can Photoshop and Illustrator and Final Cut use an arbitrarily large number of cores efficiently?

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    8. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially under OSX, with its terrible threading model.

      Yeah, I know mac fanboys - "just avoid using it that way", right?

    9. Re:Cores do not equal power by leenks · · Score: 4, Informative
    10. Re:Cores do not equal power by aclarke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have an 8-core Mac Pro. It's currently running a 4 core Windows 2008 server VM with 6GB of RAM, a dual core Windows 7 VM with 1.2GB of RAM, a couple app servers natively in Mac OS X, an a host of other applications. This machine has replaced my need for separate development and test servers, and gives me power to spare for the rest of my tasks. Yes it cost probably $4-5k once you count in the 13.5TB of drives, etc., but I use it to get work done. I rarely see my CPUs pegged at 100% for a long time, but it does happen.

      I had a very nicely specced quad core that I built before I bought my Mac Pro, and the Mac Pro absolutely blows that computer out of the water. When you have real work to do, of the type that the Mac Pro is built for, it's an awesome machine and worth every penny. If you don't need the power, then of course it's more than you need.

    11. Re:Cores do not equal power by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Three points:

      1. More cores means lower clock speed, by necessity, because it means more power consumption, so you have to turn down the frequency to keep the TDP the same. This doesn't mean you have to get cheated out of clock speed though. You will note that Apple is not forcing you to get the 12-core version: 8- and 6- core versions are available at higher speeds.

      2. What you need out of the architecture depends on what you're doing. Many Mac Pro customers are doing embarrassingly parallel workloads like 3-D rendering, where increasing your cores increases your performance almost linearly. That's a way better tradeoff then a couple percent of performance from a higher clock rate. Or, if that's not what you're doing, you can get the faster chips, see above.

      3. Yeah, architecture matters, but... the architecture's all the same? No matter which core count/frequency you get, they're all Xeon chips, they're all Nehalem. It's not like you have another choice. And for my money, Nehalem is a damn good architecture for workstation/server machines (laptops, less so, but it's still an improvement over Core 2).

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    12. Re:Cores do not equal power by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      As others have noted here in the past, the number of processing cores do not a powerful computer make.

      That is certainly true for the average to power user.

      However, if you use software specifically written to take advantages of all the cores then you are the intended audience of the Mac Pro. We use the 8-core version and have slashed computing times down from over 5 minutes per data file to less than a minute. I can see an application for the 12-core version and the completely guessed $6000 price tag makes it competitive to the hardware we usually purchase to perform these tasks.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    13. Re:Cores do not equal power by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can Photoshop and Illustrator and Final Cut use an arbitrarily large number of cores efficiently?

      Arbitrarily large numbers of cores? No, not a chance, certainly not on a shared memory architecture like the system in question. 12 cores is probably going to be OK, but when you pass 16 cores you'll start to notice the memory bottleneck; once you are at 64 cores you are basically at the limit of usefulness for shared memory architectures, and you have to be careful about memory access patterns or your software will be slower. Even "embarrassingly parallel" can suffer if the memory access patterns are bad.

      There is a reason that almost all of the supercomputers in use today use some sort of NUMA or distributed memory architecture.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    14. Re:Cores do not equal power by Alakaboo · · Score: 1

      Right, that would be the "or they know what they're doing" part of my original comment.

      These Xeons are currently over $1K each, at least on Newegg.

    15. Re:Cores do not equal power by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any OS X app that leverages GCD could benefit from those cores.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Central_Dispatch

      Although any existing app could also be written to utilize multiple cores effectively, GDC makes it much easier and requires far less raw code to accomplish.

    16. Re:Cores do not equal power by Robotron23 · · Score: 1

      That's true and the OP never denied that.

      But the fact is that in 3 or 4 years 12 core technology could well be in place on standard home PCs, where the most strain possible is a newly released videogame.

      The niche market of video renderers and other early adopters are only the first stage of buyers for this hardware - other customers will buy into it as the tech proliferates. History has shown we've seen widely marketed multi-cores aimed at everybody; and that's really what my beef is with AMD/Intel and others - they sell their stuff with the implied pretence that a big speed increase will result from more cores: It doesn't.

      That is why I felt the need to point that out above. Many will buy a 12-core CPU in ~2014, just as people who don't do CPU-heavy tasking are buying 6-core Thubans now with the anticipation of a processing power gain far greater than really happens.

    17. Re:Cores do not equal power by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly. Say a very good artist makes $50/hour. Cost to his company (Health insurance, his desk, power to his desk, 401k, taxes) is roughly double that: $100/hour.

      If one of these new duodeccore processor computers is $12k. As soon as it saves the user from 120 hours of rendering, it's paid for itself. I can easily see someone hitting that in a year. Between opening a 20MP RAW to saving, to applying filters, etc.

      Now these machines aren't going to be used for just a single year. Figure 3 year life span, at which point it's resold for $2,000 and the user is upgraded to the viginticore.

      The 'machine' cost $10,000. They can subtract depreciation from taxes. Saved countless hours (one second at a time) of their artists.

      / These numbers are made up to be round. I have no clue what graphic artists make, so don't get on my case about that. Adjust numbers accordingly. //I also don't know Latin. I just copied wiki.

    18. Re:Cores do not equal power by Tom9729 · · Score: 2, Informative

      TFA suggests the 12-core Mac Pro is actually a dual 6-core running at 3.33ghz. My last (albeit, budget) machine was a dual-core @ 3.15ghz. You're right that fewer cores = lower clock speed, but I don't think anything over 3ghz is really that bad (especially when you have 6-12 of them).

    19. Re:Cores do not equal power by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      That article is from 2005 (5 years ago). It discusses OS X servers before x86 architecture was even implemented and PPC was ditched.

    20. Re:Cores do not equal power by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      That is why I felt the need to point that out above. Many will buy a 12-core CPU in ~2014, just as people who don't do CPU-heavy tasking are buying 6-core Thubans now with the anticipation of a processing power gain far greater than really happens.

      You're forgetting the CPU suckage that is malware. With a 12 core system, regular users will never be visibly affected by "slow PC" due to malware. Get prepared for a steady rise in un-cleaned botnets.

    21. Re:Cores do not equal power by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Err, that article you linked to is from 2005. Do you have any data that isn't quite so stale? Or are you just trolling?

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    22. Re:Cores do not equal power by V!NCENT · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In case you missed it:
      Mac OS X 10.5's entire userspace app collection is agressively multi-threaded. Even the e-mail client runs multiple threads. Browsers like Google Chrome and now Firefox are multithreaded. Not to mention the tons of processes that take up lots of time if serialised. Now couple that with the driver for you graphics card that compiles on the fly and runs on the CPU and you might get the picture.

      In case nobody does: multiple cores prevents everything from slowing basically everything down. Not to mention the multi-thread potential of eventually stuff like ray tracers and whatnot. But oh well... my clue train needs to be driven to some other place. *choo-choo*

      BTW which idiots modded that guy insightful? -_-

      --
      Here be signatures
    23. Re:Cores do not equal power by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      I have just one question: what exactly is embarassing to a workload about being massively parallel? I can see how that might be embarassing for a sex trade worker, but for a computer chip?

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    24. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to point the source of the information where you based your conclusions that a memory bottleneck appears once 16 cores are reached?

    25. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quoting a 5 year old article that uses a prior architecture of Apple computer...the G5 has been discontinued for a while.

      Look, I know you you want to hate Apple and there are plenty of reasons, just use one that's more...recent. :)

    26. Re:Cores do not equal power by MaXintosh · · Score: 1

      I've been doing work in one of those 'embarrassingly parallel' problems, using the previous iteration of the mac pro, and I know that a number of other people in my department are as well. As a pure guess, I'd figure the department buys at least one to one and a half mac pro a year; if you were to multiply that across all universities of comparable size, you would have something larger than a niche market (though, obviously graphic artists and the like probably outnumber us).

      But otherwise, yes, your point is a good one - this is not a computer for Jane-Computer-User, unless she's working on some non-trivial calculations. And I would suspect how many people underestimate the number of problems there are like that outside the home computing niche.

    27. Re:Cores do not equal power by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      It's a figure of speech. The implication is "the programmers should be embarrassed that such tasks aren't taking advantage of multiple cores".

    28. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You found a five year old article and claim it is relevant to this discussion? It's dealing with OS X 10.4 on a PPC cpu. We're now dealing with OS X 10.6 on 64-bit Intel CPUs. I bet the results are a bit different now.

    29. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think scientists would buy it either. Its much cheaper to run your program on a MPI cluster or grid. I myself use an Atom machine (which is slow as hell compared to that beast) and yet its enough for me; when I need more power, I just load the program onto the grid.

    30. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The i-somethings are not really shared memory anymore: each socket has it's own set of DIMMs to play with. The MacPro is a NUMA trying to look like a SMP. Unfortunately MacOSX was not able to deal properly with that fact in the last few versions. I hope they get it right this time.

    31. Re:Cores do not equal power by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      IF and it is a mighty big one, your rendering program is written to take advantage of all those cores. Yes the OS can do some of the legwork, but the software has to be able to take advantage of all of that processing power by knowing that it can launch 11 rendering threads and keep them all in sync. That is the big problem, the software being aware of the numbr of threads it can launch.

      In some of my multi-core code I try and detect how many cores are there, but it is still a rather large pain to manage all those cores. Hopefully the OS will take over that job and I simply get info from the OS that allows me to figure out how many threads I can throw at it but still keep reasonable user interactivity. It would be very nice to be able to throw as many cores as I can get at a massive matrix.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    32. Re:Cores do not equal power by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      My old P-4 3.6ghz overclocked and hyperthreading turned off desktop kicks the crud out of most of the quad cores out there for general stuff like internet and basic home use. my 2.6ghz quad core i7 kicks it's butt hard for encoding a bluray or video editing....

      The problem is that core speeds still need to get up there. because 90% of the programmers out there are still writing everything single threaded.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    33. Re:Cores do not equal power by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      but they dont.

      Plus they dont sit there staring at the screen waiting for render to finish.. the only way to speed up render is a renderfarm.. I did this with 4 mac minis.. worked great.

      Problem is increasing render speed is only useful if you have a job backlog.. I.E. if you cna render 40% faster so you can get the jobs into the work que faster.

      99% of the time there is not a job waiting to be worked on. and even then it's cheaper to buy another older workstation to allow the editor to work on that machine during the 1st machine render..

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    34. Re:Cores do not equal power by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      You will note that Apple is not forcing you to get the 12-core version: 8- and 6- core versions are available at higher speeds.
      Since intel doesn't offer any 3 core CPUs a 6-core machine would have to be a 1x6 configuration so I wouldn't expect it to be any higher clocked than a 12-core (2x6) version.

      Assuming apple offers intel's best processors the fastest 8 core (2x4) configuration would have a faster clock speed than the fastest 12 core (2x6) configuration but only marginally. It wouldn't at all surprise me though if apple were to refuse to sell intels fastest quad-core xeon to make the 6-core option uniqevocically the best one.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    35. Re:Cores do not equal power by Bega · · Score: 1

      Yes the OS can do some of the legwork, but the software has to be able to take advantage of all of that processing power by knowing that it can launch 11 rendering threads and keep them all in sync.

      Rendering doesn't do it this way, from what I've done multiprocessor rendering on my own time. The way these are rendered (usually), is that each processor is given their own frame to render, or the renderer does its job in buckets/tiles, whereas every core has its own tile to render from the final frame.

      But the people who will own these, will probably have software that takes advantage of said amount of cores. I've had the first Mac Pro model ("only" a quad-core 2.66GHz Xeon 5150), and it's still blazingly fast after nearly 4 years.

      --

      THIS IS THE INTERNET. PLEASE PICK UP YOUR SERIOUS BUSINESS SUIT AT THE FRONT COUNTER.
    36. Re:Cores do not equal power by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Someone using a 12 core Mac Pro would more likely be doing something like animating the next Pixar movie or editing The Hobbit movie than splicing home movies together. I don't know how much a 12 core will cost but it will be a lot

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    37. Re:Cores do not equal power by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Well, I like to develop locally using small data sets, then put the code on the server and let it crunch on the big data sets once it's done. And even "toy" data sets need to be pretty big if they're going to be useful for development. As a rule, if you can make code work well on your desktop, then you've done your job right; if you absolutely positively need thousands of cores to get through a reasonable amount of data in a reasonable time, then odds are you need to improve your algorithms. Local development is not only more convenient, it also forces a certain amount of discipline on the developer.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    38. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GCD was obviously designed as a poor compromise of technology versus Apple's long-standing -- usually unsuccessful -- desire to get developers tied into their platform. There's absolutely no reason they couldn't have made it an ignorable API, like OpenMP. Shoehorning GCD into your app may be best if you're sticking to OS X and don't plan on doing much development on your app in the future, or you're already planning on doing a full re-design over time. Multi-core and many-core computers aren't going away any time soon, so most devs would be better off redesigning their apps to make use of closures (or other multi-threading strategies) in a cross-platform way.

    39. Re:Cores do not equal power by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mostly if someone is bothering to buy a Mac Pro, I assume they're doing video or some kind of 3D rendering (which may be video, engineering, etc.) Otherwise you're probably wasting a lot of money.

    40. Re:Cores do not equal power by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      [...] multiple cores prevents everything from slowing basically everything down

      Well, until something decides it needs to read or write to the disk (which everything seems to want to do all the time) in which case you'll get a lockup no matter how many cores you have.

      Hardware manufacturers: fix the disk access, for god sake!

    41. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm..Maybe Apple shouldn't have open sourced it then?

      Troll harder...

      http://www.osnews.com/story/22152/Apple_Releases_Grand_Central_Dispatch_as_Open_Source

      CD was obviously designed as a poor compromise of technology versus Apple's long-standing -- usually unsuccessful -- desire to get developers tied into their platform.

    42. Re:Cores do not equal power by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      In reality these will sit on the CEO's desk for occasional web browsing and email while the guys doing the heavy work will still be trying to get their purchase order for a Snow Leopard upgrade approved.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    43. Re:Cores do not equal power by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Someone animating the next Pixar movie is going to be using a render farm... and they don't use expensive 12-core machines for that.. it's far cheaper to use thousands of cheap linux boxes.

    44. Re:Cores do not equal power by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      Any app except Apache actually use GCD?

    45. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't aimed at your average Mac user, or even your 'power-user' - it's aimed at people who need huge amounts of CPU every now and then.

      So, Seti@Home, then?

    46. Re:Cores do not equal power by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The render farm is for the final rendering/cut. It is not used in everyday work or intermediate work. Animators rely on workstations like a Mac Pro for that kind of work.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    47. Re:Cores do not equal power by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      IF and it is a mighty big one, your rendering program is written to take advantage of all those cores.

      That's not a big IF at all. Nearly every 3d app has supported multi-threaded rendering since, at least, the mid 90's.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    48. Re:Cores do not equal power by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Well, it looks like it's designed to sit nicely next to the wireless keyboard. I'm going to buy one now, because I run my TV with a mac mini and using the mouse is kind of a chore. This will sit nicely in my lap.

    49. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being open source doesn't make it less compromised to try to get devs tied into OS X. OpenCL is open source, too, and it is for all intents and purposes Mac-only.

    50. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    51. Re:Cores do not equal power by FlyingGuy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Thanks for the great post!

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    52. Re:Cores do not equal power by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I was unclear. Yes thread based rendering is alive and well. Knowing which core gets the thread and all of that stuff is the fun part. ut it appears that apple has dealt with this from another reply.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    53. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can certainly dream that others would refrain from making their entire post a hyperlink. Then again, that might require some sort of thought process before posting. We certainly wouldn't want that now would we?

    54. Re:Cores do not equal power by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Oh... I get what you mean now. Actually I think I'm the one that owes you an apology, I glossed over the bit where you talked about how many threads to actually use.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    55. Re:Cores do not equal power by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      While that article is old, there are still some things wrong with the Mac threading subsystem. POSIX threads on OS X are wrapped around Mach threads, so creating and destroying threads is more expensive than on other *NIX systems. This is not a big problem, because generally you spawn a few threads and then let them work. Unfortunately, the pthread mutex implementation on OS X really sucks. The 'really fast' synchronisation primitives that Grand Central Dispatch uses are basically the same as FreeBSD mutexes. OS X mutexes are far too aggressive about calling down into the kernel. In the normally-uncontended case, this means that you spend ten to a hundred times more CPU time waiting for a mutex. The FreeBSD version will spin in userspace for a bit then call down into the kernel to sleep.

      There's really no excuse for this performance. I wrote my own mutex implementation as a quick benchmark. It wasn't particularly efficient, but it only took a couple of minute to write and was orders of magnitude faster than the stock implementation on OS X. The FreeBSD and GNU/Linux pthread implementations were both significantly better.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    56. Re:Cores do not equal power by barzok · · Score: 1

      Aperture 3.0 does. And even with my admittedly light usage, I'm able to peg my dual-core MacBook's CPUs at 100% while working with RAW files easily.

    57. Re:Cores do not equal power by Draek · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Say a very good artist makes $50/hour. Cost to his company (Health insurance, his desk, power to his desk, 401k, taxes) is roughly double that: $100/hour.

      If one of these new duodeccore processor computers is $12k. As soon as it saves the user from 120 hours of rendering, it's paid for itself. I can easily see someone hitting that in a year. Between opening a 20MP RAW to saving, to applying filters, etc.

      Yeah, as long as the artist in question is then hired at half the salary for half the hours. Fat chance of that.

      The comparison you should be making isn't with the artist's wage but with the overall productivity and the money *that* makes for the company, but I'd say that's a bit beyond the scope of a mere Slashdot post.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    58. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every Cocoa application on 10.6 uses it since the base system was rewritten to use GCD.

    59. Re:Cores do not equal power by am+2k · · Score: 1

      It's pretty new, but you can be sure that any app that's going to be Mac OS X 10.6-only will make heavy use of it.

    60. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      More cores means lower clock speed, by necessity, because it means more power consumption, so you have to turn down the frequency to keep the TDP the same.

      And that's what Intel's and AMD's turbo modes in their newer processors are for - if any cores are in deep sleep (I think C3 or less), their TDP budget can be used by the other cores. Essentially, you get the best of both worlds assuming your OS doesn't shift tasks from one core to the next every few milliseconds for no reason.

    61. Re:Cores do not equal power by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      IF and it is a mighty big one, your rendering program is written to take advantage of all those cores......

      Show me a pro-grade rendering app that isn't SMP capable. SMP-capable macs have been around since at least the 100mhz PPC 603 days in mid 90's. I've seen plenty of SMP Socket 7 Pentium machines in my day as well. Even better, show me a pro-grade rendering app that someone who can afford to plop down $12k+ on a Mac Pro would consider running.....

      Multiprocessor machines are NOT new by any means. Multi-core from a development standpoint ain't much different (if at all different) from targeting code for a multiprocessor machine and some multicore CPU's are little more than two single core CPU's sharing a socket and bus.

      Most decent rendering software (at least pro versions) packages are capable of distributed rendering over a network as well as SMP.

      Stop playing with trueSpace and Google SketchUp..... poisoning your minds.....

    62. Re:Cores do not equal power by toriver · · Score: 1

      Man, if only the FreeBSD guys had listened to you before they ported it to their platform, then they would have seen it was futile to do so...

    63. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pixar has been using a GPU renderer ever since Cars for prototype work. Beats the snot out of any number of CPU cores.

    64. Re:Cores do not equal power by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      You must be using Windows ;P

      --
      Here be signatures
    65. Re:Cores do not equal power by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the benefit of being able to tell your employees that they get to spend 8 hours a day on top-of-the-line equipment.

      I know that it's a huge 'benefit' that I get to play with all sorts of hardware and software at my job. I assume the best mechanics flock to working on NASCAR vehicles, I would assume the same thing happens with tech people and tech jobs.

      Seriously, if my employer pushed hard on gigabit to my desk, that would be a benefit for both of us. I don't like waiting two hours for a file to move over the LAN, and they don't like paying for it. I've been bored to tears over long file transfers or slow jobs.

      If they told me during the negotiation process that I would have gigabit, a 'workstation class' PC, access to all the toys that might touch the LAN (iPad, iPod Touch, Android stuff, netbooks, etc.), a modern Mac, and my own piece of Cisco equipment and an ESX host to play with, I would be willing to settle for less upfront pay, just because it makes my job more fun, fast, and fulfilling.

      Also, something I really miss is being able to have a pick of hardware that's getting scrapped. I don't have that option at my current job, but I used to be able to snag dozens of aging pieces of hardware, refurbish them, and give them to friends who wanted to get online. That's a huge benefit, assuming you're hiring public-service oriented people.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    66. Re:Cores do not equal power by mhollis · · Score: 1

      I think we're at the point where the software lag has truly hit us.

      I have a dual Quad-core "Nehalem" Mac Pro 4,1. So far it has 16G of system RAM. I'll add another 16G on its third anniversary.

      But Apple's Final Cut Pro is a 32-bit Carbon application. So it's pretty much limited to four cores and I'm not sure it's able to use the dual-mode of the Nehalem cores. A truly well-written bit of software should make my system "look" like it has 16 cores and use all of them. The most I have seen Final Cut use is four (or eight if it does take advantage of dual-mode). So I can have a render cooking away and I have four cores to spare (though I may not have much RAM).

      Oh, but wait -- nobody just uses Final Cut! No, they're using plugins!

      Right you are (you smarty-pants, you)! You're using plugins to make Final Cut really sing. After all, green screen work, particle effects and other effects require the work of Boris Continuum Complete, Digital Anarchy, ToolFarm and CoreMelt, not to mention others. So how many cores do they work with?

      Turns out, in some cases, only one.

      So you could be editing away, planning your render to take up a few hours overnight and come back to work (as I did with an earlier version of Red Giant Software's ToonIt which only used one processor core) after a cuppa joe and a splendid breakfast in the morning to see your Mac tell you, "only six more hours to go."

      I really needed to kill something when I saw that.

      Oh, and let's talk about Photoshop, shall we?

      I did not upgrade to CS4. Adobe really stroked the Mac crowd nicely when they released a 64-bit (Vista-UGH!) version of Photoshop for Windows only, folks -- despite the fact that Apple had 64-bit built into its operating system two years before Microsoft (unless you count XP-64 which lacks drivers and now lacks any support from Microslush). Photoshop CS5 is now out and it's been done right because someone at Adobe had a nice steamin' hot cuppa Cocoa and rewrote it, like they should have when Apple told them to in 1999 (please tell me why Adobe seems so much like GM, OK?) that Carbon was transitional and that it would start getting old and crusty pretty soon.

      But, as far as I can tell, all of the plugins for Photoshop are still 32-bit, so you won't be seeing any improvement in speed until they're rewritten, too.

      Seems like Apple could take a cue from Adobe with Final Cut now, couldn't they.

      Most of the Adobe suite, excepting Photoshop and After Effects is 32-bit Carbon. So you're not going to get Grand Central Dispatch sending stuff out to 8 cores or 16 core-lets (with Nehalem). So the 12-core Mac will have -- let's see... eight cores sitting idle most of the time? Boy, I really want one of those!

      Apple needs to release these computers and these servers. The technology in these beasties is frightfully fast (I know, my Mac can run like a bat outa wherever if it's running a 64-bit application). But remember: Microsloth Word is going to want the first core and it's going to hog it. Grand Central Dispatch isn't going to get you anywhere with Dreamweaver. If you have Excel running in the background, Mathematica may stall because it's running out of RAM and resources that Microsoft Excel wants to keep.

      I would imagine we're looking at another generation in software before our computers are actually unbound by the dependencies written into what we're using currently.

      Oh, and I do note that the splash screens for Microsoft Excel still stay up for a long time -- even at 2.93 GHz.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    67. Re:Cores do not equal power by mhollis · · Score: 1

      Can Photoshop and Illustrator and Final Cut use an arbitrarily large number of cores efficiently?

      Please see my earlier post for the long explanation, but:

      Photoshop CS5 can. CS 4 and CS3 only see four cores, that's all they were programmed to see because that's a Carbon limitation. Since Illustrator and Final Cut Pro are also 32-bit Carbon applications, they cannot either. Final Cut Pro, when rendering as hard as it can render, only uses 4 cores and some of the plugins only see one core. Photoshop plugins (almost all of them, which have not been rewritten to Cocoa and to 64-bit) only see 4 cores.

      But I'm lying, too. Photoshop CS5 sometimes doesn't use the CPU at all. CS5 will use the GPU for some of the things it does.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    68. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you didn't know, Intel and AMD are both NUMA now when you are talking about current multiprocessor setups. Each package has on-package memory controllers and aches and a cache-coherent interconnect fabric between the packages. So the bottleneck would be something like the bandwidth per package or the usual bisection issues of a larger multi-package mesh. What's the bandwidth of the latest double or triple-channel DDR3 stuff that these chips are driving?

    69. Re:Cores do not equal power by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much a 12 core will cost but it will be a lot

      The new Mac Pro with 12 cores starts at $4999.

    70. Re:Cores do not equal power by internettoughguy · · Score: 1

      Actually Pixar uses Linux workstations for the bulk of it's "animation" work, as does Weta Digital. I think that these are primarily targeted at non-linear editing.

    71. Re:Cores do not equal power by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Not according to this old slashdot article. Also judging by the documentaries of movies at Pixar, there a few Macs to be seen.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    72. Re:Cores do not equal power by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      If only Apple would finally get around to inventing something cool for OS X to do that. It'd make it so much easier for the developer. Knowing Apple they'd probably make it so that it was really simple. Like a few lines of code.

      You talk about Grand Central which helps people with parallelizable code write parallelizable code.

      The GP is talking about code which is hard or impossible to make parallel since it's intrinsically linear (no pieces of it can run together with other pieces of it).

      Also even if it was theoretically possible for a fraction of the software, you need to make untold number of developers invest time and resources to rewrite their already working programs to work in at least 12 busy threads.

      If you don't already use software which can make good use of 12-cores, which some professional software does, but most software does not, we're at least 5-10 years away of you utilizing those. And by that period, it'll be time to buy a new Mac again.

    73. Re:Cores do not equal power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few people seem to equate Mac Pro with Workstation - "it's from Apple, of course it's a consumer device!" is the misguided thought.

    74. Re:Cores do not equal power by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is a reason that almost all of the supercomputers in use today use some sort of NUMA or distributed memory architecture.

      Aren't all multiple-processor (or even multiple-core) AMD systems NUMA?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    75. Re:Cores do not equal power by bbtom · · Score: 1

      I agree: Grand Central Dispatch/libdispatch is fantastic. HawtDispatch does similarly for Java and Scala. If you are using Scala, you even get a very, very similar syntax to the C/C++/Objective-C GCD code. Very cool. Much simpler than handling your own threads.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  5. Expected gestures by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Funny

    And all of the expected gestures are here: two-finger scrolling, pinch to zoom, fingertip rotation, and three- and four-finger swipes.

    Ah, nope. You missed one.

    1. Re:Expected gestures by KDEnut · · Score: 1

      The single fingered salute?

    2. Re:Expected gestures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And can this be mounted on the chair for the Mac user's customary input appendage?

    3. Re:Expected gestures by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah yes, the most communicative of the fingers. I wonder why it isn't used to close apps when you're finished - seems like that would be a great stress reliever.

    4. Re:Expected gestures by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think that gesture is handled by iSight.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    5. Re:Expected gestures by GarryFre · · Score: 1

      And the hammer fist and five knuckled fist.

      --
      www.Migrainesoft.com - Computer giving you a headache? We can fix that!
    6. Re:Expected gestures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite; the gesture to which you're referring has hard-wired interrupts.

      There is no bit of code, no driver to translate the datastream necessary.

    7. Re:Expected gestures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in fairness it can't tell which finger you're using.

      Or, for that matter, if it's a finger.

  6. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by bannable · · Score: 2, Funny

    Put two in craigslist's personals and the rest on eBay. That ought to do it!

    --
    "If you see a man on a horse, he is likely an enemy. Kill the man and eat the horse."
  7. Any sufficiently advanced technology... by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I find this "magic" marketing strategy to be a complete turnoff.

    The fact that you're on Slashdot makes you Not The Target Market.

    To most people, virtually any computer thingie is sufficiently advanced.

    1. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You seem to be under the mistaken impression that the majority of people on Slashdot actually understand technology.

    2. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, what about the 12-core Mac? I mean, the only people who are really going to be able to make use of that kind of power are the same type of people who look at Mac OS X as a friendly Unix that can run Matlab AND Photoshop, probably heavy on the Matlab. Maybe 3D animators, but I've known a few of those, and they were pretty on the ball in general. I mean, I see a 12-core Mac Pro and think back to the Mac Pro we had mixed in with the HP and Sun workstations in the FEL control room when I did an internship back in 2002, I don't think "web designer" or "philosophy major." Just saying.

    3. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Troll

      Apple isn't about making cool technology any more - it's about marketing to the masses.

      Sure, I can use a 12-core device - but then again, I can write multi-threaded code in c, so I'm not dependent on a higher-level abstraction to hopefully "manage" my threading for me (while sucking so much resources that 12 cores becomes the new dual core). The average user simply can't even make proper use of 4 cores - and if you gave them a really pimped-out liquid-cooled overclocked single-core 32-bit machine (gobs or ram, a really good motherboard, multiple hard drives with the os and data spread amongst them so almost every drive access hits the drive cache), a slimmed-down OS that doesn't need to run bloatware like virus scanners, and stuck a 12-core label on it, they would be enthusiastic. AND most of their software would run faster.

    4. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I made a website in HTML once. Can I talk about things that 4chan told me to hate with the big boys, now?

    5. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      likewise the average program, even plenty of games, can't even make proper use of 4 cores. Wasn't there an article about this on slashdot recently?

    6. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      If you didn't hand type it with ALT-#### codes then it doesn't count. :p

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    7. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      The fact that you're on Slashdot makes you Not The Target Market.

      If you didn't splooge when you read "Apple Launches New Magical Trackpad, 12 Core Macs", you're Not The Target Market.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    8. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      the same type of people who look at Mac OS X as a friendly Unix that can run Matlab AND Photoshop, probably heavy on the Matlab.

      Well, it might be nice to have more power, but it wouldn't be for PhotoShop. I learned to use the GIMP first, PS later, and I find GIMP is every bit as good for what I do. (And to get this out of the way before some fanboy bleats about CMYK: GIMP handles this just fine if you really insist on squandering dead trees.)

      I don't mind admitting that OS X is a friendly Unix, though whether I would actually pay money for it when my freebie MacBook dies is another matter. I'll probably end up sticking with Linux.

    9. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More like that what geeks think aren't that essential to selling computers. It's a bit like selling cars to race drivers (professional workers) or car mechanics (support people). They probably have some very different thoughts about cars than we do, and think the car commercials are quite silly. But the car companies don't care because there's a huge market of soccer moms and dads that need it for their commute and driving kids around. Just like there's a huge market of people that aren't very interested in computers but want to get stuff done using one. Even when it comes to choosing platform the fact that your geek prefers Linux/OpenOffice/Firefox/GIMP doesn't necessarily make it a good idea if your people are all experienced Windows/MS Office/IE/Photoshop users.

      Funny enough, if you try bringing your product to Linux you get nothing but hate burn. Try reading the comments to uTorrent coming to Linux and see what I mean. It's 95% "we don't want no closed source shit, too little too late, $torrent-app rules, fuck off". This despite being quite probably the best and certainly the most popular client on Windows, and lots of people might look more favorably on Linux if they didn't have to learn a new application. "Here's Linux, ditch all your old software, but trust me all that G/K stuff is much better" is a WTF to everyone but OSS zealots. For a platform that supposedly promotes choice, it's amazing how militantly hostile some are to giving you one.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by mlts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a sense, the Mac Pro is the only "UNIX workstation" on the market today. There are tower machines made by Sun and IBM which can be used as such, but not sold as this.

      Supposedly, Autodesk is going to start getting their mainstream version of AutoCAD on OS X RSN.

      Of course, the question is why a Mac Pro over another x86 machine such as a Dell Precision? Multiple reasons:

      1: OS X tends to have lower latency than Windows out of the box (you can disable services in Windows to help things). This, combined with the fact that Macs do not need a CPU and I/O draining antivirus program resident 24/7 means that a Mac Pro can outperform a similarly configured Windows machine.

      2: Known quantity. Application makers have a far smaller number of combinations of machines and graphic cards they need to test and support.

      3: Piracy. Mac users tend to pirate a lot less, so there will be more paid seats sold.

      4: Support. At this level, it is assumed that the workstations come with premium support, so it isn't like the consumer market where Apple just puts the other PC vendors to shame. However, it does help having one vendor sell and support the OS and hardware.

      5: Education. Professors used to buy UNIX workstations because they needed them for SPSS, Maple, and other tasks. Because Apple gives a discount for universities, this means that Mac Pros will end up in the statistical computing labs.

      6: Security. This is debatable, but it can be said that UNIX is more secure than Windows, although the difference narrows if the Windows admin knows what he or she is doing. Since high end workstations tend to work on items that are crucial trade secrets, having solid security is a must.

      7: Resale value. Mac Pros are priced competitively with other workstation class machines, so having the machines worth more when they are changed out at the end of an amortization cycle doesn't hurt.

    11. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Incorrect.

      A 12 core MAC is not for the rich uber-idiot that uses it for Facebook. It's for real Graphics work and Video editing. And those people ARE here on slashdot and Therefore the target demographic. Final Cut suite is the best video editing suite out there and giving it 12 cores would make editing that damned abomination called AVCHD better than it is now. Problem is It's priced at a point that all the small guys (Less than $1.2m yearly sales) cant even think of affording it. I need to upgrade 3 editors and I'm not looking at apple. I cant get 3 screaming fast i7 dell pc's running windows 7 and the latest vegas 9 suite AND the adobe after effects for composting and CG.. It's less powerful and far slower workflow than Final Cut and Motion but I can pay for training, all new software + computers for 3 editors for the price of 1 12 core mac editor.

      I dont want to switch, but apples pricing and their horrible nasty inefficient implementation of AVCHD in final cut makes switching to Vegas9 a no brainer choice. I hate Sony becauset hey created the AVCHD abortion... but it's what the industry is standardized on for broadcast HD right now that comes out of these cameras... The JVC cameras shoot MOV, but they utterly suck in video compared to the Panasonic and Sony cameras that networks like Discovery networks and even NBC uses.

      I'm not the only one... Apple is pricing themselves out of the market right now.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      and if you gave them a really pimped-out liquid-cooled overclocked single-core 32-bit machine. they would be enthusiastic. [...] AND most of their software would run faster.

      Agreed. Being able to address more RAM than you can afford all at once is great if you actually need to do that. But unless you are doing heavy-duty CPU and RAM-intensive number-crunching, all you are really doing is feeding the marketroids.

      When I'm not doing molecular modelling, I manage to work perfectly productively on a 10-year-old box running Linux on a 1GHz Athlon single-core machine that is well-matched with its Asus motherboard and 512MB RAM.

    13. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by catmistake · · Score: 1

      ...I don't think "web designer" or "philosophy major." Just saying.

      Then, obviously, you are unfamiliar with Adobe Flash and Artificial Intelligence, respectively. Just saying.

    14. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Vectormatic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, dont tease him, HTML doesnt count anyway.. unless you wrote the http-deamon hosting it yourself, on punchcard, uphill both ways, in ten feet of snow..

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    15. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by pinkj · · Score: 1

      I work in post-production audio/video and I'm positive my boss will be drool over this 12-core. Anything that can pump out RED camera footage faster is a plus.

    16. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      12 cores will make an enormous difference for pro audio and video production. From an audio perspective, it means a significant increase in the number of plug-ins (virtual instruments and FX) that I can use simultaneously. As far as video goes, I use Red Giant Software's Magic Bullet Looks for video post production. The tool performs frame-by-frame rendering and a 12 core machine will slice processing time by about 80%.

    17. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by molnarcs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1: OS X tends to have lower latency than Windows out of the box (you can disable services in Windows to help things). This, combined with the fact that Macs do not need a CPU and I/O draining antivirus program resident 24/7 means that a Mac Pro can outperform a similarly configured Windows machine.

      I agree with most of your points except this. I have an antivirus (Microsoft Security Essentials) on my netbook, barely notice it's presence on my netbook. I also disabled all services (Windows 7 Home Premium), more for psychological (I don't like crap running I don't need) than any measurable gain. We are talking about a single Atom processor here - so do you think this would make a difference on a 12-core monster processor? Yeah, you may gain a few millisecond render time here and there, and well it can add up to a few seconds (maybe even a minute!!!) over a year... but seriously, this is not exactly a huge advantage ;)

      As for reason #3 I think that's more an argument for why not. #7 I'm not sure, you can buy a G5 Mac Pro now for 200$, that's a fraction of the original price. The loss seems to me pretty much on par with (over 90%) PCs. I also wonder about your latency claim - I don't dispute it, I just don't know what to think... do you have any proof? The only benchmarks I saw comparing the three platforms (PC/Linux PC/Win7 Mac/OsX) was on phoronix, and I don't trust them too much (but the mac box lost on almost all benchmarks).

    18. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by takev · · Score: 1

      64 bit address space means that mmap() works on large files, even if you have less than 4 GB available memory, this can be a large boost with a lot of programs that handles large files. This includes movie, audio and image editors. But also games that can map in the whole level.

      Although theoretically you can do small mmap slices when using 32bit address space, programming it is more complicated and probably will introduce a performance penalty compared to just mapping the complete file.

      To me the performance is not that you can address more physical memory, but that you can use the 64-bit address space for other things, including mmap().

    19. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by takev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft Security Essentials in pure virus scanner mode is no problem.

      But when it is in active mode, scanning data from the network, etc. It does slow down your machine. I had it running when playing EVE Online, and every second the frame rate/update rate would drop a bit, it was very noticeable. When I turned of the active part, it ran smooth again.

    20. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the FUCK does the parent deserve a "troll" mod? Because he said something mildly disparaging about Apple? He's clearly in the business, and clearly the target market, and his comment is both informative and insightful.

    21. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that their "coming in august" is missaligned on FF

    22. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by TrippTDF · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I did IT at an Ad Agency. I remember recommending we upgrade the art guys to 24 inch iMacs. These guys just used Photoshop and Illustrator all day, and the iMacs, at the time around $2K, were the perfect thing for them. When I took this plan to my boss, the final decision maker, he made me go with some crazy Pro setup instead- I think with displays the machines cost about $4K each, just for Photoshop and Illustrator.

      Why?

      Because they were more expensive, which equaled "better" in his eyes. You can't forget there are a lot of stupid people out there with a lot of money, and just figure that higher cost equals better product... Hell, look at Apple's entire product line- way more expensive than compatible Dell or HP products (though I do agree the Apple is higher quality.)

    23. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by kangsterizer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There's no real to use uTorrent on Linux tho.

      I'm not going to use aria2c on windows with a crappy command line, neither going to run it in cygwin or powershell.

      Now if uTorrent for Linux was truly excellent, why not, but... ...then comes the closed source argument, which is just like the GPL vs BSD and friends. Choosing closed source is always the wrong choice in that case. Some drivers are closed source blobs and they are successful why? Cause there's no alternative. That's the only reason. Sorry, theres many very good alternative to uTorrent, arguably pretty much better ones too.

      So after all, It has nothing to do with being a new app.

    24. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by spazdor · · Score: 1

      C'mon now. 4channers are old hands in the art of Alt-# ascii entry.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    25. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      I work in a neurobiology lab that is almost all Mac. The experiment rigs have Mac Pros. PCs are used where they are required to run some piece of specialized equipment, like an IR video gaze tracker, or a neural interface.

      We have one Mac Pro kitted out with 32 GB of RAM, running Matlab on large neural datasets. Not a 12-core, though.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    26. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by BZ · · Score: 1

      > so do you think this would make a difference on a 12-core monster processor?

      It depends on your workload and possibly your virus scanner setup. A number of virus scanners perform scans on every single file creation. If you're doing a lot of those (think compiling a large program), the virus scanner becomes _very_ noticeable. The same issue can arise with the OS search indexer, for that matter; disabling both for the relevant directories can give a noticeable performance boost to compiling. When I've tried doing that with a mozilla objdir, compile times got about 2-3x faster... Of course more cores _may_ mitigate the problem, though this isn't a task that parallelizes any better than compiling itself does.

    27. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Matlab is threaded, but it's limited. There's a toolbox for it, which allows for some things like parallel data processing (e.g., I have 8 sets of data and need to do the same thing to each--each core does one set) and parallel for loops, but other than that, there's not much tolerance for multicore processing.

      It's also worth noting that Matlab's parallel toolbox only works with 8 cores at the moment. Next year's is supposed to double to 16, but who knows if that happens for sure. You've still got the other 8 (virtual) cores not being used with 2x hexcore i7.

      The major issue with scientific computing is that many of our algorithms don't parallelize all that well. They weren't written for that purpose. This leads to using less efficient algorithms that we can do in parallel.

    28. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4: Support. At this level, it is assumed that the workstations come with premium support, so it isn't like the consumer market where Apple just puts the other PC vendors to shame. However, it does help having one vendor sell and support the OS and hardware

      If you're in the market for a serious workstation, you probably have someone employed to take care of your systems. The support you get from the manufacturer is essentially worthless. It's more hassle and time consuming than having someone on site who takes care of everything.

      5: Education. Professors used to buy UNIX workstations because they needed them for SPSS, Maple, and other tasks. Because Apple gives a discount for universities, this means that Mac Pros will end up in the statistical computing labs.

      Maple runs on Windows fine. Bad example.

      The reason UNIX is used in scientific computing is because a lot of old software packages are in continued use. These things were developed long before Windows; while not the same stuff developed in the 1970s and 1980s, a lot of what's out there is based on that stuff, and reflects continued development. Porting is too much work and not of value--the number of people who need to use this software is very small--so it was never done.

      6: Security. This is debatable, but it can be said that UNIX is more secure than Windows, although the difference narrows if the Windows admin knows what he or she is doing. Since high end workstations tend to work on items that are crucial trade secrets, having solid security is a must.

      Let's face facts here: if your computer's data security is that important, it's not going to be on the open network. No way that happens. Not being exposed to the outside means you don't need antivirus and the security of the OS really isn't as big an issue.

    29. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Now if uTorrent for Linux was truly excellent, why not, but...

      There is no uTorrent for Linux at the moment, only via WINE. The article was about a native version coming, and that was the general reception.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    30. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I ran in to the same thing, arguing that phone desk support folks could get by with just a Mac Mini, as all they needed to see were control panels and such. He insisted all the help desk folks got Mac Pro towers. Weird. 'Course, he didn't go for my idea of just getting 1 or 2 Macs and having support folks just remote in to them to see how things were set up. I guess I'm just a cheap bastard.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    31. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Depending on the work your "art guys" do, the Mac Pro might have had more expandability for RAM (editing printed material can eat up RAM like crazy) and hard drives (since you can't argue that SATA is faster than even FireWire 800), and on the next upgrade cycle you won't pay for the monitors again (if that was included in your pricing, which I hope it was).

    32. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps more importantly, this point is not even true. The OSX UI is noticeably more latent than any version of Windows.

    33. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Lol I was being sarcastic :)

    34. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Draek · · Score: 1

      And the same happens for bringing products to the Mac except replacing "closed-source shit" with "ugly non-integrated crap" just because it doesn't support Apple's patented three-finger semi-circular swipe gesture or some obscure idiocy like that (see also: Opera 10.60 announcement, every comment about OpenOffice on Mac *ever*). And Windows power-users have similar reactions as well except they don't even try to give you a reason for their hatred other than "it's a {Linux,Mac} app, ugh".

      Still, being free to do something doesn't mean free from criticism of it and if some devs want to bring a closed-source app to Linux that's not better than what we currently have, "freedom of choice" ain't a good enough reason not to call them up on it.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    35. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by afabbro · · Score: 1

      5: Education. Professors used to buy UNIX workstations because they needed them for SPSS, Maple, and other tasks. Because Apple gives a discount for universities, this means that Mac Pros will end up in the statistical computing labs.

      How many "statistical computing labs" exist? The stats class I took a few years ago in grad school just handed out a time-bombed SPSS CD that was apparently made for the education market. We loaded it on our own PCs.

      For anything else, most compute labs I've seen do not use Apple workstations...they use Linux, which is far cheaper. Lots of engineering packages are released for Linux and Windows but not MacOS. A whitebox PC with Linux loaded on it is still much cheaper than a Mac, regardless of any educational discount.

      7: Resale value. Mac Pros are priced competitively with other workstation class machines, so having the machines worth more when they are changed out at the end of an amortization cycle doesn't hurt.

      A Mercedes retains more of its value than a Chevy, but they're both still worth 60%+ less in two years.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    36. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Maybe 3D animators, but I've known a few of those, and they were pretty on the ball in general. I mean, I see a 12-core Mac Pro and think back to the Mac Pro we had mixed in with the HP and Sun workstations in the FEL control room when I did an internship back in 2002, I don't think "web designer" or "philosophy major." Just saying.

      If the web designer or philosophy major worked heavily with video editing, then yes... Yes, they can use all 12 cores and wish they had more.

      I remember back in the day I had Final Cut Pro 3 on a PowerPC Mac. Basically, to render a 5 minute video usually involved me taking a 2 hour break. For some longer projects I would just leave the computer on overnight.

      Of course, its not so bad these days... But you're still waiting on the computer a lot of times when you want to render.

      Oh and Photoshop is always a beast no matter how much computer resources you throw at it...

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    37. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Your netbook likely isn't running lots of processes, each of which have a number of large files open. Antivirus can get incredibly annoying under such circumstances.

    38. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      not to mention they may be writing to fiber, like my design and tv production department does, which means you HAVE to have PCI slots.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    39. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      ESET NOD32 > Norton or McAfee.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    40. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just buy a Red Rocket and some other hardware encoders? We use them on all our FCP edit suits and some Avid machines, far faster than the 8 core Macs we have, and I would think faster than a 12 core.

    41. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many "statistical computing labs" exist? The stats class I took a few years ago in grad school just handed out a time-bombed SPSS CD that was apparently made for the education market. We loaded it on our own PCs.

      For anything else, most compute labs I've seen do not use Apple workstations...they use Linux, which is far cheaper.

      I'm one of the computer geeks in a division consisting of biostatisticians and biomathematicians at a major cancer research hospital. All of the senior faculty use Macs.

      Until recent years, they've used the Macs mostly to access software on cheap Linux servers, but they're moving away from that now. Increasingly, they're buying high-end Macs and using them for statistical computing, leaving the Linux boxes for grad students and other slaves.

    42. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by emt377 · · Score: 1

      I think with displays the machines cost about $4K each, just for Photoshop and Illustrator. Why?

      Because in the developed world people cost a lot more than machines. If you think $4000 is a lot money, wait til you see payroll...

    43. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      fibre

    44. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by pinkj · · Score: 1

      You're right. We have Red Rocket. What do I know, I'm in audio!

    45. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      The new Macs look interesting but apps like LightWave and Maya will probably have them for breakfast.

    46. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the same happens for bringing products to the Mac except replacing "closed-source shit" with "ugly non-integrated crap"

      Quark, much Adobe software, Roxio, many games... there's lots of nice software that was originally for other OS's and was ported to OS X. Users don't complain because software isn't originally for their platform. No one cares. Users complain when software is crappily ported, whether it's to OS X or to the Wii.

    47. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would buy a G5 Mac Pro these days? All the software that needs a Mac Pro has been ported to x86; and the G5 is an absolute power hog - the electricity it needs to do its job is way more than that needed by the Xeons to do it faster. The only reason to get a G5 now is if you need a space heater, really. The money you'll save in buying it for $200 will quickly be chewed up by the electricity bill.

    48. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "In a sense, the Mac Pro is the only "UNIX workstation" on the market today. There are tower machines made by Sun and IBM which can be used as such, but not sold as this."

      The Mac Pro isn't sold as a Unix workstation either. I guess it's the only one when you exclude all the others.

    49. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Some drivers are closed source blobs and they are successful why? Cause there's no alternative.

      I wouldn't say that, for example the nVidia graphics driver is a successful closed-source driver that has open-source alternatives.

    50. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this guy up, there is a lot of bullshit moderation going on here lately..

    51. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      There are some fair points there - these days so-called "Macs" are just UNIX PCs - but:

      3: Piracy. Mac users tend to pirate a lot less, so there will be more paid seats sold.

      Not this FUD again. Do you have evidence (in particular, looking at piracy in the applications you're talking about, rather than including all the Windows users pirating games etc), or are you just insulting people based on what operating system people use?

      (This is a common Apple myth - other various forms including "Linux users don't buy software" or "Non-Iphone users don't buy apps".)

      6: Security. This is debatable, but it can be said that UNIX is more secure than Windows

      It is indeed debatable, and it can be said whatever you like :)

      7: Resale value. Mac Pros are priced competitively with other workstation class machines, so having the machines worth more when they are changed out at the end of an amortization cycle doesn't hurt.

      I've never understood this argument. An Amiga 4000 maintains its resale value, but I wouldn't argue it as a point in its favour these days. If the price isn't dropping, it just means that the machines are more expensive in the first place - you can't make money from this method.

    52. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Good point - only a few years ago were Apple trying to falsely claim "first 64 bit PC", claiming that the Alphas didn't count, as they were "workstations". I fail to understand how workstations are mutually exclusive to PCs (is my workstation I use at work not a PC?), but nonetheless, it's clear that Apple do not consider their "Mac" PCs to be "workstations".

    53. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      the open source alternative 3D driver ? no, there's no 3D nvidia alternative driver. Only the binary blob. The only alternative is for 2D. And people want compiz & friends, if not 3D gaming or other things. (there's a 3D branch for the driver but its NOT ready)

      there's *no* alternative.

    54. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      OS X tends to have lower latency than Windows out of the box (you can disable services in Windows to help things).

      Do you have any benchmarks for this ? OS X is much more sluggish than Windows in general use, so it's kind of hard to believe.

    55. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      the open source alternative 3D driver ?

      No, 2D. Not everyone wants a flashy, glitzy, heavyweight desktop.

      there's no 3D nvidia alternative driver. Only the binary blob. The only alternative is for 2D. And people want compiz & friends, if not 3D gaming or other things. (there's a 3D branch for the driver but its NOT ready)

      there's *no* alternative.

      Oh ok so you only consider it an alternative if they both have all the same features. In any case users could choose ATi cards with their open source drivers but it still seems as though nvidia is the manufacturer of choice since it's binary drivers perform better than ATi's open source ones.

      Also why would you suggest that open Vs closed is the motivation behind driver choice, in my experience it's all about performance.

    56. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Well, you're in for a surprise in 3 years. The 16-core chips on the roadmap are aimed at the consumer market.

      And don't forget, they're talking about the 12-core being around 6k. I remember spending that on a computer without even a hard drive way back when (which would probably be more like $30k now), so even a $6k box is going to find its way into more than one or two home setups.

    57. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the average people want to have 3D support, otherwise they're not buying the expensive NVIDIA card.. they buy a cheaper card or use integrated graphics. The open source 2D driver is actually faster in many ways than the Nvidia driver.

      Now, I'm actually using an ATI card with the open source driver which supports 3D and I'm happy with it. It doesn't break each kernel upgrade, and it doesn't make my video crash from time to time with no chance of debugging or fixing (which is what FLGRX - the ATI binary blob does here - yeh that pretty much counter the "all about performance", who cares about performance when the card doesn't actually work... with open source drivers i can fix it)

      Then again, if it's all about performance for *2D* you're full of shit, clearly :P

    58. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Same here. :)

    59. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can buy a G5 Mac Pro now for 200$, that's a fraction of the original price.

      You're talking about a seven year old computer at $200 (G5 single CPU, 2GHz tops).

      That alone is proof of the point. I know people who upgrade their Macs every two years, selling their old one for well over half what they paid for it and therefore reducing the costs of the replacement to a lower total expenditure than upgrading every two years on comparable PCs.

      Try that with an Acer and see how far you get.

    60. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      Apple isn't about making cool technology any more - it's about marketing to the masses.

      The 12-core MacPro is anything but a mass-market machine. For that market Apple's products are 4 cores max (and usually just 2).

      Well, you're in for a surprise in 3 years. The 16-core chips on the roadmap are aimed at the consumer market.

      Did this really just happen?

    61. Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Well, you're in for a surprise in 3 years. The 16-core chips on the roadmap are aimed at the consumer market.

      Did this really just happen?

      Check out AMDs roadmap. 16 cores in 2014 - for the masses, not the server market.

      They remember the "good old days" when people would pay $500 or more just for a cpu, or $6,000 (in pre-dot-com-boom-bust) for a PC that had way less power than the cheapest game console.

      We can expect dual and quad 48-core systems (96/192 cores) by the end of the decade.

      There's already one company selling a specialized 892-core system-on-a-chip (or maybe it's 982 cores) for simultaneous multiple video stream real-time manipulation, and it's only in the low 5 figures.

  8. Agreed. That +50% comes out of nowhere. by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 0

    Sure, you have +50% cores (12 instead of 8). Now in terms of productivity, how much are you likely to gain? Not much, unless you run number crunching software that can scale to multiple cores. It's been several years since we've seen the introduction of multi-core machines. Yet I'm not sure software is being developed with that in mind. On the good side, putting SSDs in that machine will make the processor(s) less likely to wait for I/O on demanding tasks. The article fails to mention... is flash supported?

    1. Re:Agreed. That +50% comes out of nowhere. by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sure, you have +50% cores (12 instead of 8). Now in terms of productivity, how much are you likely to gain?

      I recently tried to spec out a render node for a graphics artist friend of mine. I was trying to convince him that a single CPU mid-range Nehalem based Xeon system might be more cost effective in the long run. His plan was to build a single CPU Extreme Edition Core-i7 system. This was based on Netrender's benchmark utility placing this single CPU system ahead of the dual C2Q systems by a large margin, and even way ahead of dual Nehalem systems.

      My logic failed to win the argument. I simply can't spec a dual quad-core Nehalem that can beat a single i7-EE. Even cost over time, it looks more cost effective to build two i7-EE systems instead of a single dual CPU system.

      So, to answer the question directly, I would guess my friend is looking at gaining perhaps ~1hr a day in rendering time. That might be huge.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    2. Re:Agreed. That +50% comes out of nowhere. by bored · · Score: 1

      I didn't find the stated benchmark, but the i7ee is a Nehalem based core. For raw performance you should be able to find a Xeon which bests it in nearly every benchmark. Going multiple socket, provides both more cores and more memory bandwidth. For example the 980X is basically just W3680, a pair of X5680's should win on nearly every benchmark that is either CPU or memory band-with intensive. For some working sets the larger caches on the beckton cores could result in improvements significantly larger than the 3x cost for them. Those working sets may be rare (larger than 8M smaller than 24M).

      Now cost/performance curves are more tricky. The extra cost for the dual socket motherboard must be made up with cheaper CPU's, but if your comparing it to a pair of i7EE's the extra system costs could easily make up for it. This is actually where AMD starts to be a real contender. If your system is scaling well, the large AMD systems are significantly less expensive for actual core counts. While the high end Intels are faster, you can get nearly the same performance for 1/4 the cost from AMD. For rendering, a dual socket 6134 will probably beat the intel i7ee with a wide margin for slightly more money.

      For a large shop buying a few systems and running the actual datasets/code is the best way of determining this. Then you buy a bunch of the best system. If your large enough you can probably get the trial systems on loan. Doing a one off for your friend is much harder.

    3. Re:Agreed. That +50% comes out of nowhere. by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Maxon's benchmark utility for NetRender is called Cinebench:

      http://www.maxon.net/downloads/downloads/cinebench/cinebench-115.html

      I worked really hard to best the single CPU i7-EE system's mark, but was not able to according to this benchmark utility.

      My logic failed to win to the argument, and my friend ended up going with the i7-EE based system. In a year or so he will pick up another at a much lower price. I just couldn't get the numbers in the benchmark to agree with my theory that a dual CPU system with 1 cpu now, and 1 cpu later would be the better performance per dollar.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    4. Re:Agreed. That +50% comes out of nowhere. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So, to answer the question directly, I would guess my friend is looking at gaining perhaps ~1hr a day in rendering time. That might be huge./quo
      I'd say that depends on what his work is. If he's doing sims, for example, I think he likely made the right choice. If he does a lot of texturing and test renders, for example, I think he could have done a little better with multiple cores.

      Mainly what I've found is that the human-interaction-hours are far more valuable than the render times. I could save an hour in rendering, but the difference between being done at 3am and 4am is 0. (Usually...) What often happens is my computer will be busy with something intensive and while that's happening I could open up another app (maybe it's another instance of the 3d app, maybe it's Photoshop or something) and I can pick off a low-hanging fruit while it's going. In other words I often run multiple apps at the same time. Extra RAM and having a core or two available really helps there.

      So I mentioned running sims earlier. If he spends his time not able to do anything at all because of that progress bar, then I think he made the right decision. That happens often if you're trying to get an app like Maya to make a window shatter or a building collapse. If he does texturing, modelling, and lighting, he might get faster response times, but he may spend more time twiddling his thumbs.

      I hope I wrote that clearly. I've had trouble explaining this in the past.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Agreed. That +50% comes out of nowhere. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I love how I said "I hope I wrote that clearly..." and forgot to close the quote. Sorry gents.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Agreed. That +50% comes out of nowhere. by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Heh us humans are prone to make mistakes no worries!

      I'm not entirely sure what his process is... If anyone has seen the TV show "Lost" he did the title roll for that :D If you know what it takes to render something like that, you know more than I do heheheheh

      I know that the Cinebench score was very important to him in his decision making process...

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  9. Surface as button. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does anyone else hate trackpads acting as buttons? I always end up selecting or launching all sorts of stuff I don't intend to when using laptops with that feature turned on.

    1. Re:Surface as button. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      These have an actual physical click, and tap to click is always off by default on a Mac.

    2. Re:Surface as button. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, hate it too. I really like the big physical button on the older Mac trackpads. It's easy to hit with your thumb while you have one or two fingers on the trackpad itself. No accidental clicks, no accidental pointer motion while you click.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. whats the point? by Superken7 · · Score: 0

    "And Magic Trackpad sits at the same height and angle as the Apple Wireless Keyboard, so you can go from trackpad to keyboard in one seamless motion."

    Thanks, but I think I'll stick with my clit^H^H^H^H trackpoint where I dont even have to move my hands when switching from keyboard to mouse and viceversa.

    Also, why use a touchpad when you got a mouse? The magic mouse sure is very uncomfortable but regular mouses are much more pleasant to use than touchpads or trackpoints or whatever. And its not like they can't do gestures.

    1. Re:whats the point? by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      Maybe not useful for many, but finally I can have handwritten input via the Magic Trackpad. I was reluctant to buy a Macbook just to make use of this feature.

    2. Re:whats the point? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      The gestures would be a serious plus. Being able to scroll with the two fingers, zoom in, out, trigger expose, etc would all be quite nice. Also, if you had wrist problems, not having to move the mouse around would probably help.

      The gestures become second nature on a MacBook(Pro).

      I could see it. I'm not sure for me. For my work desktop it might be nice. But at home, if I still had a desktop, a big part of it's reason for being would be gaming, and you need a real mouse for shooters and many other games.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:whats the point? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      There are probably a few *nix admins that wonder why you would use a mouse when you have a perfectly good keyboard. I think that this device might have a place, but I don't think it's something that will be hugely successful.

      I haven't used the device so I can't comment how well it works, but Apple's notebook trackpads are usually regarded as pretty good. Personally I always prefer to use a mouse, but I can see how a person might be able to be more productive if the device were really precise, the person was very familiar with it, and the software could take advantage of all of the gestures. Would probably be great for something like Photoshop or video editing.

      Some of us are just too used to a mouse to change our ways. After watching new computer users struggle with using a mouse, it makes me think that if I spend enough time learning to become proficient with one of these devices, I might be able to improve my productivity in some cases. It would be interesting to find someone who's really good and compare their ability to use it precise with someone who has exceptional mouse control.

    4. Re:whats the point? by Superken7 · · Score: 1

      Sure.

      Maybe I should have used another title for my post.
      Regular mouses can't do such intuitive gestures such as pinch and zoom.

      I am sure there are people who will love this new touchpad.
      But others might want to just get a tablet for extended functionality such as handwritten input, design, etc...

      And I have not tried it out, but if its anything like the macbook's touchpad, moving around with the mouse and clicking with it is IMHO a much comfortable experience with a regular mouse.

      I can see how others might benefit from the gestures though.

    5. Re:whats the point? by shrimppesto · · Score: 1

      Also, why use a touchpad when you got a mouse? The magic mouse sure is very uncomfortable but regular mouses are much more pleasant to use than touchpads or trackpoints or whatever. And its not like they can't do gestures.

      I used to be similarly convinced of the superiority of the mouse over the trackpad. When I bought my first laptop years ago, the first thing I did was hook up a mouse, even before I had booted it up. But over time, I became used to the trackpad, and I learned to control a trackpad just as well as a mouse. One fateful day, I noticed that my mouse had collected a layer of dust on it (because I had inadvertently become an exclusive trackpad user), so I unhooked it.

      I don't know if it's the whole not-having-to-move-your-hand thing, or if it's the not-having-to-use-your-elbow, or what. I just know that when I'm on a system that has a good trackpad and a good mouse, I always end up using the former. I'm not saying mice (or trackpoints, or touchscreens, or whatever) don't have their utility, because they definitely do. But I can definitely see why people would be interested in getting a trackpad for their desktop.

    6. Re:whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you end up buying it, don't get disappointed by the unsuitable input precision for this task. Just cherish new ways of doing it - you know, all Apple products and users are creatively... special. In the way special Olympics are special...

      Of course you can attempt writing notes like you'd do it with finger colors. Just that paper and finger colors would probably be easier in this regard... and cheaper, too!

    7. Re:whats the point? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Also, why use a touchpad when you got a mouse?

      Perhaps because apple's trackpads are so good that they're better than mice – I'd certainly prefer to use an apple trackpad to a mouse.

      For those that aren't that way inclined, perhaps for using your computer at slight range –if you're sat in your comfy chair, it's much easier to put a track pad on the arm and use it than it is to try to mouse on your leg/chair arm etc.

    8. Re:whats the point? by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      If you end up buying it, don't get disappointed by the unsuitable input precision for this task. Just cherish new ways of doing it - you know, all Apple products and users are creatively... special. In the way special Olympics are special...

      English isn't the only language that people use...

    9. Re:whats the point? by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Handwriting with a finger point? Why not spend the extra $30 and go with a wacom multiouch + pen digitizer, and be able to actually write and draw. Or if using fingers is all you really want, you can save $20 and just go with a Wacom multitouch board.

    10. Re:whats the point? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      I've noticed i can only use an ipad for about 20 minutes before my fingers feel bad. There's no way i want to replace my mouse with something i have to constantly drag my fingertips over. If everyone used these all day at work, we'd all have gnarly calloused finger tips.

    11. Re:whats the point? by mevets · · Score: 1

      Mice require a flat surface. With this, you can hook up to a doritos drip lie on the couch and surf on your big tv. Its magic.

    12. Re:whats the point? by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      If you have to use your elbow, you have you mouse sensitivity set [i]way[/i] too low.

    13. Re:whats the point? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      The iPad is large though; I can easily surf on my MacBook Pro for an hour or two without too much problem. Even then, it's usually from bending my wrist, not the finger movement. Since you'd just let you hand sit there and only move you fingers a little, I think it could work pretty well.

      The higher your typing:mouse ratio, the better it would be. If you had to do a lot of mousing throughout the day, I'd image a real mouse would work better.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    14. Re:whats the point? by Hast · · Score: 1

      From reviews it seems like the Bamboo pads don't work very well for touch input. They are glitchy and produce bad input data.

  11. Editing images by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    The TFA suggests that this trackpad would be good for editing images. Not having seen the device I can't say for sure, but isn't a finger a little too big and inaccurate to use as a precision targeting tool? If it wasn't then all the high end track pads currently used for editing would be using fingers rather than a stylus.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Editing images by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use the pinch to zoom to make the target area larger.

      As an added bonus you can yell "Enhance!" every time you zoom-in.

    2. Re:Editing images by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to be sure, the technology required to track fingers is much different than the one required to track a stylus, in power, complexity and components. For one thing, the stylus requires pressure or conductive contact, while the finger requires capacitive contact.

      Think about this, if it is all the same, how come phones are now including touch-screens instead of the old, tried-and-true stylus like the PDAs of yore? Perhaps it's because the technology has improved enough, and its cost lowered enough as to be practical.

      To say that a finger-trackpack would not be good for editing images just because older tools did not do it, is as short-sighted as saying touch-sensitive screens on phones are useless because they didn't used occur in smartphones before.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    3. Re:Editing images by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      If only someone could invent a device that would simulate the human finger, but had a finer point.

      It'd be even better if it was in the shape of a pen, because that's what most people are used to holding.

      You could call it... iMagicBicPenPointer.

    4. Re:Editing images by smallfries · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that you've only used a trackpad on windows? Apple have a different algorithm to convert motion (not position) on the trackpad into motion of the cursor on the screen. It's like a windows box with mouse acceleration turned up to max but it doesn't kick in as easily. Hard to explain, you just have to play with it to feel the difference.

      Typing this on a MBP I can get to anywhere on the screen in a single swipe yet it retains enough control that I can select single pixels with precision. It's a joy to use and it just seems right - you don't really notice the difference until you switch back to windows and then trackpads are the most annoying thing in the world.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    5. Re:Editing images by EvanED · · Score: 2

      For one thing, the stylus requires pressure or conductive contact, while the finger requires capacitive contact.

      I'm sort of nitpicking here, but neither of these are quite true. You can have active styluses that don't require any contact at all, and for fingers you can have non-capacitive touch screens that work by pressure. Indeed, such touch screens have a significant benefit: you can use them with gloves. (You can't do this with, say, the iPhone, unless you buy special gloves.) You can use them with simpler styluses.

      Think about this, if it is all the same, how come phones are now including touch-screens instead of the old, tried-and-true stylus like the PDAs of yore? Perhaps it's because the technology has improved enough, and its cost lowered enough as to be practical.

      To play devil's advocate, I would say it's not so much because the technology has improved enough to make it a good solution for image editing, but rather because the technology has improved enough to make it a good solution for most tasks you'd expect to do on a phone.

      (In fact, my phone, the Nokia N900, actually comes with a stylus. It doesn't get much use, but it does get some. For instance, I've got a Boggle game on it -- if I use my fingers to select the squares, I block a lot of the view.)

      To say that a finger-trackpack would not be good for editing images just because older tools did not do it, is as short-sighted as saying touch-sensitive screens on phones are useless because they didn't used occur in smartphones before.

      But it's not really any more silly than saying that, because touch-sensitive screens on phones are now commonplace, that technology would be good for image editing.

      If you want a more convincing argument you could see what people have to say about using the Macbook's touchpad for that sort of work -- I have no idea what you'd find.

    6. Re:Editing images by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The TFA suggests that this trackpad would be good for editing images. Not having seen the device I can't say for sure, but isn't a finger a little too big and inaccurate to use as a precision targeting tool?

      Being able to pan and zoom around the image you're working on is handy. That's one of my biggest time sinks in Photoshop, actually. Hmmm... pity I use Windows...

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Editing images by Draek · · Score: 1

      Exactly, but saying "it may not work as well for editing images but..." would be marketing suicide.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    8. Re:Editing images by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      >> I'm sort of nitpicking here, but neither of these are quite true. You can have active styluses that don't require any contact at all, and for fingers you can have non-capacitive touch screens that work by pressure. Indeed, such touch screens have a significant benefit: you can use them with gloves. (You can't do this with, say, the iPhone, unless you buy special gloves.) You can use them with simpler styluses.

      Yes, nitpicking. The technology and its implementation has changed over the years, that is really not relevant. My point was that touch screens--as implemented successfully in the market today--is a different technology than the stylus-pads from before.

      >> To play devil's advocate, I would say it's not so much because the technology has improved enough to make it a good solution for image editing, but rather because the technology has improved enough to make it a good solution for most tasks you'd expect to do on a phone.

      Agreed. I was not implying that it is a good solution for image editing. My point there was that a newly popular technology not being used before for a specific application does not a priori preclude it from being useful for that application.

      >> But it's not really any more silly than saying that, because touch-sensitive screens on phones are now commonplace, that technology would be good for image editing.

      I did not claim that touch-sensitive screens would be good for image editing because they are popular in phones; I claimed that its inclusion in previous implementations of a specific application is not a prerequisite for its utility. New applications for old inventions are defined all the time.

      Who's to say whether it is good for image editing or not? Those who use it, of course, would decide. You seem to agree with this. However, it not being used before for image editing does not instantly disqualify it.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    9. Re:Editing images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one thing, the stylus requires pressure or conductive contact, while the finger requires capacitive contact.

      I think he's referring to Wacom-type tablets with styli that are inductively coupled, i.e. there's a little coil in the pen or puck and the changing magnetic field of the tablet surface is used to detect position (including angle) and switch positions.

  12. I guess here's cross post to this one... by Kalidor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So .. since all their touch technology derives from FingerWorks [ http://fingerworks.com/ ]. They revived the iGesturePad from 1999 and added a raiser.

    Question 1) Do we get to see any of the 60 or so gestures they used to use a decade ago that Apple declined to reuse?

    Question 2) Is there a chance that it means the TouchStream LP is coming back in a form I could potentially get for my windows9x+/*nix9x computer again ... without having to pay several hundred on eBay + driver hunts... just several hundred to Apple?

    -------------
    My hope is that they are answered as followed:

    1) Yes

    2) Yes, more than a chance, and soon.

    --

    Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    1. Re:I guess here's cross post to this one... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      just several hundred to Apple?

      The trackpad is only going to cost $70 according to TFA, so while it isn't as cheap as a bottom-barrel USB mouse you can buy at best buy, its certainly not a couple hundred dollars.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:I guess here's cross post to this one... by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      The iGesturePad was a similiar price point. The Touchstream LP(on the website link) was significantly more ... functional ... and cost a lot more.

      Question 2 was more in hopes that the latter product will be delivered as well as the smaller cousin.

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    3. Re:I guess here's cross post to this one... by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Bottom barrel mice are not found at best buy.

      I get my "bottom barrel mice" out of the bottom of my barrel (technically it is a large plastic tub) that contains a random assortment of computer components left over from the last 20 years of hoarding parts.

      The $20 USB optical mice from best buy are over priced, but hardly bottom of the barrel.

    4. Re:I guess here's cross post to this one... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Question 3) Is there any legal issue involved with their blatantly lying on the product page?

      Apple writes:

      The new Magic Trackpad is the first Multi-Touch trackpad designed to work with your Mac desktop computer.

      That's a pretty blatant lie. Given that Apple bought FingerWorks, they can hardly be unaware that FingerWorks sold a multi-touch trackpad designed to work with the Mac in 1995.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:I guess here's cross post to this one... by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      Good point! Unless ... maybe this is the same exact hardware in a shinier packaging? Then maybe they can still claim it's the first?

      Or maybe it will be claimed that the FingerWorks systems were never designed to work with Apple, they just happened to?

      I didn't even ponder that one. Someone get metatic a cookie!

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    6. Re:I guess here's cross post to this one... by jollespm · · Score: 1

      You can get alternative drivers/software for the Magic Mouse, so it only makes sense that 3rd parties would enhance the Magic Trackpad even if apple doesn't. MagicPrefs is the one I use currently.

    7. Re:I guess here's cross post to this one... by jadrian · · Score: 1

      There is no way apple is coming up something very close to the Touchstream LP.

      First the device is not particularly trivial to use, there is a learning curve - typing on a flat keyboard, resting hands, changes in key positions (like "return"), tons of gestures, using two trackpads (one for mouse one for text cursor). It's very costumizable, and you can easily define your own gestures. It came with special modes for specific environments, including Emacs and KDE. It came with open source software (for windows) and an open API.

      Regarding driver hunts, I'm not so sure you need any. At least it was always plug and play for me, in both windows and linux.
      Regarding the price. Probably. I have thought about selling mine, but wouldn't do it for less than several hundred euros.

  13. What a hose job.... by rimcrazy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hey, I'm a Apple Fanboy but this is just a screw job. No SATA III, No USB 3.0 ????

    I need a good platform for my 3D work and was hoping that there might be something making the new MacPro's worth waiting for but not this.

    Just priced a nice Win 7 system from Newegg and me thinks for work I'm switching back. This is just absurd.

    --
    "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
    1. Re:What a hose job.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me thinks Linux on x64 is what thou needst.

    2. Re:What a hose job.... by rimcrazy · · Score: 1

      Yea, but I need Adobe in my workflow. No way around it. Dual booting sucks. Win 7 is not near as sucky as previous versions of Windows and my video workflow in HD would scream with the new Premium Pro and an NVidia card. I will wait to see what the new FCP looks like but if it is the rumored iMovie on roids that will be the final nail in the Apple coffin for me as far as professional workstations.

      --
      "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
    3. Re:What a hose job.... by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      Depends on the software he's trying to run. If he can run it on Linux then that would be a better route but if WINE doesn't support it fully and it isn't written for Linux then his option is to run a VM and at that point he might as well just run Windows 7.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    4. Re:What a hose job.... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends, how much is your time worth? I worked as an IT guy for a medium sized production house that switched from a mix of PC's and Macs to all macs back in 2002 - 2004. It saved them something like $100,000 in salary costs per year because the 3 MCSE's on staff were let go. All they did was update anti-virus and then clean all the malware & viruses off the machines the AV missed.

      In 2005/2006 I left the company and did some freelance editing & 3D (lightwave) work for other videographers I knew in the area. These were mostly smaller shops that maybe had a couple jobs a year that had such requirements. Between the lot of them, it was enough work to keep me busy and earning a good living while studying for the LSAT. I used a Quad Core G5 with 8GB of Ram that set me back about $12k at the time for monitor and everything. Why? FCP & Shake were big reasons. But the other reason had to do with time. I think an equivalent Windows based PC would have been around $9K and I even bought my RAM aftermarket from Crucial for the G5. I studied for the LSAT while projects were rendering. So even if I was not in front of the computer, it was still making me money. I would set some projects to render over night. So while I was sleeping, the machine was working.

      Given the performance hit of AV + 3 - 4 hours of down time per week for scanning + another 2 - 3 hours a month cleaning all the crap the AV missed would cost me something like $1200 per month in opportunity loss. And I had the work to keep the machines running. In fact I bought a few Mac Mini's to use as full time rendering nodes.

      Then there would have been large software purchases to switch to PC. I was used to FCP & Shake and would have had to spend $$$$ to purchase windows equivalents and then spend more time learning the new programs.....

      Lot more to think about there than just the initial cost of a machine and E-peen factors of who has the latest and greatest video card.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    5. Re:What a hose job.... by rimcrazy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I run Maya, FCP, Adobe Master Suite. I am a one person shop. I've gone back and forth between Win and Mac for the past 25 years and very knowledgeable on both systems. I have Shake but it is dead. Apple bought it and killed it. I compose using Toxik which comes with Maya. Most, if not all, available plug-ins for Maya run under Windows. Only some run under Mac. A critical one I currently use only runs under windows. I currently run under bootcamp so I can use that plug-in. Rendering time, especially in HD is a HUGE factor for my workflow. The speed difference between Premier Pro running their Mercury engine on a NVidia card vs FCP plodding along on my Mac is somewhere between 15 to 20 X. This is not trivial. Premier Pro is not quite as nice as FCP. I've used both and I know what they both can do but at that much price/performance tradeoff you can't ignore it.

      As far as scanning, I have AV on my WIn 7 side but I don't get email or surf the web on Windows except to get upgrades and support. I know where to go and what to do and not do. I can scan at night and there is no impact to me.

      Mac's are nice but quite frankly, the writing is appearing on the wall. I really don't think Apple much cares about that desktop market. The % of sales and profit to Apple is in the round off error of their annual report. If I was Job's I'd have killed it a while a go. I'm a Fan of Macs but in the end I need to get my work done. I'm not going to get Mac's just because their Mac's. They need to justify their existence to my bottom line and my production workflow. At the current direction and price-point I'm saying there needs to be some serious consideration of alternative options.

      I love Linux but I've done the VM and Wine bit and it's a joke when it comes to real 3D and video production. I have to run native and I have to have all my apps available to me all the time and I don't want it across a gaggle of machines. I use Linux servers for farm rendering and that works great. For desktop apps, no.

      --
      "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
    6. Re:What a hose job.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is the most reasoned argument I can think of.

      Apple mobile devices will kill Apple's desktops.

    7. Re:What a hose job.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      What Apple Fanboy needs USB 3 when they have FireWire 800?

    8. Re:What a hose job.... by rimcrazy · · Score: 1

      How about 3.2Gbit/s vs 800Mbit/s for starters.....

      --
      "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
    9. Re:What a hose job.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Does that include realtime data support and not hogging the host's CPU?

  14. Magic Trackpad by Duradin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's the Magic Trackpad, not the "Magical" Trackpad.

    It'd set a better example if Taco would stop trolling every Apple article.

    1. Re:Magic Trackpad by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      It's the Magic Trackpad, not the "Magical" Trackpad.

      It'd set a better example if Taco would stop trolling every Apple article.

      Or, you know, you could just laugh at it because it was so overused in other iProduct discussions.

      It's not a troll. It's a pun.

  15. About Time! by SeriouslyNoClue · · Score: 0

    While other companies like Asus and Dell are offering customers weak underperforming netbooks and media centers, Apple knows what the averager person wants. Just like getting a Hemi in your new Dodge, this is going to be the killer laptop and desktop at a premium price. Sure, the few CEOs and executives out there are going to get even more expensive servers for their personal needs but the poor McDonalds employee is going to save up their money to get these kinds of machines. And when it comes to sales that spells volume for Apple and an equation for guaranteed success.

    Dell and Asus are going down.

    1. Re:About Time! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      How's the KoolAid addiction coming along? Did you manage to 1/2 your consumption to just 5 crates a day as you said you might?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  16. You call that thing magic? by ITBurnout · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't be impressed until I can make a flaming pigeon come out of it.

  17. $2500 for quad, 3GB ram and only 5770? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    $2500 for quad, 3GB ram and only 5770?

    You can get quad cores for $800-$1500 with 4gb and 5830 or better.

    at least the 5770 is much better then the past for base cards. But will apple make you pay for the 5870 $300 making it cost $150-$200 (5770 cost apple price likey higher) + $300

    1. Re:$2500 for quad, 3GB ram and only 5770? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No, $1999 for a quad with 4GB RAM and a 5750. Notably though... Including a 27" monitor that dell sells for $1099, so that's $900 for a quad with 4GB of RAM and a 5750.

    2. Re:$2500 for quad, 3GB ram and only 5770? by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      And? If you want a Mac you have to pay for a Mac. The premium might be higher than in the past but it's always been there. At least they have good build quality most of the time.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    3. Re:$2500 for quad, 3GB ram and only 5770? by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      And a Xeon with ECC RAM. You left that part out. Don't compare a commodity i7 custom build to an OEM Xeon-based workstation. They aren't the same thing.

    4. Re:$2500 for quad, 3GB ram and only 5770? by jensen404 · · Score: 1

      I work with Photoshop on a Mac. Can you explain the real world advantages a Xeon CPU with ECC ram will have over a similar i7? How about the base Mac Pro vs a $2500 i7 machine?

    5. Re:$2500 for quad, 3GB ram and only 5770? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      And a Xeon with ECC RAM. You left that part out. Don't compare a commodity i7 custom build to an OEM Xeon-based workstation. They aren't the same thing.

      A quad-core Dell T3500 will match a Mac Pro hardware-wise for ca. $1000 less.

  18. Very Nice by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    The Mac Pro is so nice buy the price is way to high the track pad is a nice touch.

  19. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I didn't know Apple did Trade-ins for non Apple products.

  20. Re:If i hear "magical" one more time... by cowscows · · Score: 1

    It must be miserable life you live where some marketing guys in california that you've never met have so much power to make you angry. Or you're actually indifferent but have decided to complain because it's easy to do so and it makes you feel better about yourself.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  21. 100% bogus article, er... slashvertisement! by unrtst · · Score: 1

    From the touchpad article, "I can’t wait to get hold of one", and later, "It’s made with smooth, wear-resistant glass that feels great to the touch."

    and it ships in 24hours... so it's not like a real review should be very difficult!

    Would be better of just to post the apple store page directly. Horrible.

  22. Re: Apple product naming by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's brilliant, really. We're just complaining about "unified branding". People are forgetting that the prior marketing disaster was "My". My documents, Myspace, yecch.

    "e" was taken and done to death. e-mail, e-zines, etc.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  23. Apple and Gesturing by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    While the new "magical" trackpad gives you more space for gesturing, I do always wonder what gestures iPhone users will be giving Apple?

    1. Re:Apple and Gesturing by linhares · · Score: 1

      the bend over maneuver?

    2. Re:Apple and Gesturing by russotto · · Score: 1

      While the new "magical" trackpad gives you more space for gesturing, I do always wonder what gestures iPhone users will be giving Apple?

      The one you're thinking of results in a 50dB drop in signal, so not that one.

  24. Re:If i hear "magical" one more time... by theghost · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It must be a miserable life you live, devoid of the ability to recognize exaggeration with humorous intent. Or you actually just enjoy acting superior to others because it's easy to do and makes you feel better about yourself.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  25. Feels great to the touch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, when this site says that it "feels great to the touch" -- does that mean that they've actually tried one already? How else could they really know?

  26. Problem with the trackpad by drsmack1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anyone know when Steve Jobs will tell us how to hold it? I want to make sure I'm doing it right.

  27. Re:If i hear "magical" one more time... by rxan · · Score: 1

    If I hear them describe their tech a magical one more time I'm gonna...

    ... roast their ass with a level 5 firebolt.

  28. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by Microlith · · Score: 0

    They're called "future cultists." It's the easiest way to generate more followers and customers get a great deal on new hardware.

  29. Re:If i hear "magical" one more time... by cowscows · · Score: 1

    sorry, but that original comment did not even begin to approach humorous. I trust you can see why I was confused.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  30. Not a twelve core computer by voss · · Score: 1

    Its a system with dual six-core cpus. Its like saying a computer with two one-core cpus is a "dual core" system. It may be literally true but very misleading and not what a customer expects.

    1. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really doubt that the customer cares.

    2. Re:Not a twelve core computer by pankkake · · Score: 1

      That's what I was wondering. 2×6 cores is worse than 1×12 cores, because you lose cache sharing, and it will run hotter and consume more power. Apple is lying to its customers nothing new here.

      --
      Kill all hipsters.
    3. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      When you are talking about single core chips in dual configuration, the distinction is important.. but when you are talking about 6 core chips in dual configuration, the distinction is no longer important.

      That being said.. what a ripoff high end macs are.. their stock 8 core Mac Pro on their store website is $3300 .. For that price, it should be 24 real cores.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    4. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      That being said.. what a ripoff high end macs are.. their stock 8 core Mac Pro on their store website is $3300 .. For that price, it should be 24 real cores.

      Where can I get a 24 core machine for $3300? (Nota Bene: For the purposes of this exercise, GPU cores will not count.)

    5. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CPU (pick one):

      2 x AMD Opteron 6168 (1.9GHz) - $760 x 2 = $1520
      2 x AMD Opteron 6172 (2.1GHz) - $1000 x 2 = $2000
      2 x AMD Opteron 6174 (2.2GHz) - $1300 x 2 = $2600

      Motherboard:

      ASUS KGPE-D16 Dual Socket G34 - $439

      Everything else is cheap.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:Not a twelve core computer by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      So there aren't twelve cores in the new Mac Pro?

    7. Re:Not a twelve core computer by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Apple's dual-CPU Mac Pros are actually their most competitively priced computers. This isn't a Skulltrail board. We're talking about dual Xeons, ECC RAM, etc. Price out the same system from Dell or HP and you'll find that there isn't much difference in price. However, Apple hasn't yet posted the new systems and pricing to the store yet, so try to match specs with the new stuff on the tech specs page.

    8. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that $225 worth of FB-ECC RAM, a $100+ case/PS, 2 x $35 = $70 heatsinks, a $50 video card, a $65 hard drive, a $25 optical drive, a $40 FireWire card, a $10 keyboard, a $10 mouse, a $10 Bluetooth adapter, and $100+ worth of OS/software. That's $750 worth of "cheap" extras you failed to account for, is probably not comprehensive, and doesn't even consider the time or effort you'd put into building the thing and installing software on it.

      Now, you may not *care* about any of those extras, so they might not be worth $750 to you (though I suspect you'll at least want a case, RAM, and heatsinks) but they're all included in the $3300 price, and it's absurd for you not to consider 1/3 of the equipment in a price comparison.

      I also have to question the value of the 12-core CPUs from AMD. They have advantages in certain applications, but even in fairly high parallel use environments like VM hosting, Intel's 6-core versions do at least as well, and support a higher clock speed for better single-thread performance. So unless you limit the scope of your comparison to those specific applications were more cores == more performance you really should be comparing against another Intel 2x4 box instead (or once the pricing if out for the new one, a 2x6 box).

    9. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and it's absurd for you not to consider 1/3 of the equipment in a price comparison.

      A) Its not 1/3rd of the price. That would be $1100 worth of equipment.
      B) I didnt ignore it. I just didnt detail it.
      C) absurd is the inclusion of a $50 firewire card, and a $100 OS, for a server.

      The bulk of the cost is in the CPU's and Motherboard, and I still had as much as $1340 of headroom. You don't like that fact, thats fine. But dont try to muddy the waters... we are comparing a 24 core AMD server vs an 8 core Intel server sold by Apple for $3300. AMD wins massively on performance in this comparison. AMD also wins on price.

      I also have to question the value of the 12-core CPUs from AMD. They have advantages in certain applications, but even in fairly high parallel use environments like VM hosting, Intel's 6-core versions do at least as well, and support a higher clock speed for better single-thread performance.

      Really? You dont bother to worry about price anymore? Those 6 core chips that actually compete with AMD's 12 core chips in "high parallel use enrivonments", are significantly more expensive, which is the point. A Mac Pro is a server built on Intel, but AMD is the performance king of the servers at every price point they offer, and thats before the Apple tax.

      We'll see what Apples price will be for their 12 core server. My guess is around $4000 considering the difference in price between Intel's 4 core and 6 core server offerings. It will be a huge ripoff.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    10. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Apple's dual-CPU Mac Pros are actually their most competitively priced computers. This isn't a Skulltrail board. We're talking about dual Xeons, ECC RAM, etc. Price out the same system from Dell or HP and you'll find that there isn't much difference in price.

      So if other companies charge similar prices, its not a ripoff?

      You can literally build a significantly better performing 24-core system for less than the price of that 8 core system. Maybe to you that doesnt mean the 8 core system is a ripoff, but to me it does.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:Not a twelve core computer by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Quad-core starting at $2499.

      8-core starting at $3499.

      12-core starting at $4999.

      source

      Strictly speaking, the Mac Pro isn't a server. It doesn't come with "OSX Server." It's more of a workstation, though you may well complain about the apparent lack of FireGL or Quadra.

      The XServes start at $2999.

    12. Re:Not a twelve core computer by pankkake · · Score: 1

      Who said that? You're missing the point, macfag.

      --
      Kill all hipsters.
  31. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be buying a 12 core Mac, because it will help me get my job done in a little less time, and will pay for itself in half a day's work tops. With 12 cores, it will be about a quarter of a day. Then I can spend the rest of the week doing whatever the fuck I want.

  32. all of the expected gestures by Culture20 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Including extended middle finger?

  33. Re:If i hear "magical" one more time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am indifferent, but yea magical? um yea, la de shit apple welcome to a decade ago, its not magic its a already failed product your re branding (again)

  34. fuckin' trackpads, HOW DO THEY WORK?!! by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    strange, I don't really see *pple pursuing the Juggaloo demographic, what's up with that?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  35. mod parent up... by halber_mensch · · Score: 2, Funny

    so he can do a unit test

    --
    perl -e "eval pack(q{H*},join q{},qw{70 72696e74207061636b28717b482a7d2c717b343 637323635363534323533343430617d293b})"
  36. Seems pretty cool by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

    If they make a keyboard with this builtin (instead of the numeric keypad), I'm getting one.

    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  37. Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but only by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? But only have ATI Radeon HD 5750 with 1GB in the $2000 system 27" screen and apple wants to push games on mac os x?

  38. Re: Apple product naming by wed128 · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget the eMac.... we've come full circle!

  39. Re: Apple product naming by sarahbau · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except I think the 'e' in "eMac" stood for "education" rather than "electronic." It would be odd if Apple had sold the "internet" Mac for years before building an electronic Mac.

  40. They Released More by keytoe · · Score: 1

    No mention of the new iMac? New 27" display? And the completely out of nowhere $29 battery charger?

  41. Re:Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's the great downfall of Apple desktops. They ship MacPro's (which are their big powerful towers) and iMac's (which are All-in-One Monitors built with laptop parts), without anything inbetween. Slotting a bigger graphics card into an iMac is just not possible, and yet there isn't a more affordable tower available than the Pro. If you are a serious gamer, then a Mac Pro ain't much different than a tricked-out Alienware/etc machine price-wise. But if you are a semi-serious gamer with a light wallet, Apple ain't your friend.

  42. I wouldn't get my hopes up by kelanden · · Score: 1

    Judging from Apple's page, all the gestures are the same as the ones used by the current MacBook Pro trackpad. Apple didn't even bother to change the preferences panel (screenshot). Apple's claim to fame is keeping things simple as possible for consumers, and adding gestures that aren't supported by any other Apple device would tend to run against that.

    Seeing as Apple has never bothered to provide official Windows driver support for their peripherals, I wouldn't hold my breath on that, either. Somebody will probably rip the appropriate bits out of Boot Camp if and when they update it to support the pad, however (this has been done before for other Apple devices).

    1. Re:I wouldn't get my hopes up by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Seeing as Apple has never bothered to provide official Windows driver support for their peripherals

      That's not really true, they do provide support for their AirPort devices (in the form of a configuration app), and of course the whole iPad/iPhone/iPad range. That said, you're probably right about the trackpad. But I wouldn't rule out somebody whipping up an open source driver for Linux.

    2. Re:I wouldn't get my hopes up by am+2k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Apple already posted Windows drivers for the trackpad for 32bit and 64bit.

      They're labeled as BootCamp, but I guess they'd work on any PC (haven't tried it of course).

  43. NO MATE Display and room for 1 HDD with no E-sata by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    NO MATE Display and room for 1 HDD with no E-sata NO slots NO USB 3.0 NO Firewire 1600,3200 as well.

    also what if I have a display I want to reuse?

  44. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by greg1104 · · Score: 1

    I hear Chatroulette is paying good money for minors who willing to help them clean their site up. The job requirements are that the kids are easily offended and willing to press charges.

  45. Simulation by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some thread hit on rendering use. However, there is also vast amounts of simulation use. For example, COMSOL Multiphysics (http://www.comsol.com/products/multiphysics/). Also, in the academic world is it easier to buy new computers on grants than upgrade old ones. The "old" computers typically get moved to computer controlled tools (when the tool computer dies).

  46. fine want $1200-$1500 head less system not $2500 by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    fine want $1200-$1500 head less system not $2500 come on people do not like screen lock in. and want a little more room then 1 hdd and not slots even haveing 2 pci-e slots + video card will be ok.

  47. Apple stole a week of my time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was totally dissapointed with my Mac, so much i had to return it after one week.

    They sell it as an UNIX-like system... and that's a huge lie... First of all the file system is case-insensitive by default... you have to reformat your harddrive to enable the case-sensitive option, and then... most of the MacOS applications won't work, becuase they weren't written with case-sensitivity in mind.... So you can either have a case-insesitive system that will give out tons of problems with case-sensitive UNIX applications... or a case-sensitive system in which only the UNIX applications will work...

    In my case, i bought a better specced (and poorer quality) PC for the same price and installed Arch on it... I just hope Apple wouldnt have lied in the UNIX-like thing and would save me a week of my time.

    1. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they sell it as a certified Unix system, not Unix-like.

      If you want case sensitivity for some of your applications, then create a separate partition for that purpose. Things that need one or the other can be stored in the appropriate location.

    2. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

      Is there a particular reason to WANT a case-sensitive system? Genuinely interested.

    3. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see the bit where he said:

      a case-inse[n]sitive system that will give out tons of problems with case-sensitive UNIX applications

    4. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

      Ah, no, that goes part-way to answering. Though obviously the next question is "Why make a case-sensitive application in the first place?".

    5. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by DurendalMac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disk images. Use them. You can make a case-sensitive disk image on a case-insensitive filesystem and vice versa. Presto, you can now use your UNIX software and OS X software. Not the most convenient way to do it, but it does work for most things.

      And OS X is certified UNIX. There was no lie there whatsoever.

    6. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      Though obviously the next question is "Why make a case-sensitive application in the first place?".

      Because coders are, as a general rule, morons. Who think they're very smart. And therefore conclude that case-sensitivity is somehow a feature, not a flaw, because Linus and RMS and the Unix way and lol noobs lol.

    7. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by profplump · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to run linux that's fine. I run lots of linux machines myself, where OS X is not an appropriate choice for a variety of reasons. But if you want to be take seriously you can't complain that OS X isn't UNIX-y enough based on the default choice of a case-preserving file system.

      A) It's trivial to add another, case-sensitive partition to your system. The standard Apple tools allow this without even the need to seek a command line or a secondary boot disk.

      B) Even if you're too lazy to resize your partitions, you can use disk images to simulate partitions. They mount just like regular partitions and again can be easily created and auto-mounted at login with the stock toolset.

      C) While there are some apps that have lazy case conventions for file names, none of the base system does. So you can move the OS to a case-sensitive filesystem and just keep a case-preserving one around for "bad" apps that can't handle it (I'm looking at you Adobe). This one requires a reboot, but can still be done without a second boot disk, and without running the OS installer -- just copy the files around and resize the partitions. Or with a third-party tool and a separate boot disk you can convert in-place without copying anything.

      D) All of the bad apps can be fixed with a simple rename or symlink to allow the file to be accessed be the expected name. It's sometimes a hassle to figure out what the file name is, but it's easy to fix once you do.

      E) All major desktop OSes have had either case-insensitive or case-persrving file systems for decades -- DOS, Windows, OS/2, Mac OS, Mac OS X -- case sensitivity is not going to become the default in any desktop OS because it would confuse *most* computer users. Heck, many of the major file-sharing protocols, including those in use on UNIX systems, don't even *support* case-sensitive file names.

    8. Re:Apple stole a week of my time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will my UNIX app run under MacOS? -Yes, if it's been programmed with filesystem case-insensitivity in mind. If not, it won't run in a default MacOS installation, you would need to create a case-sensitive disc image (really userfriendly, kids friendly, elderly friendly, newbie friendly,...)

      Some people thing that the possibility of having "My Folder", "my folder", "mY folDer",.... in the same directory is a feature. From an usability point of view "TPA Records from December", "TPA RECORDS FROM DECEMBER", or "TPA Records from december" are refering to the same file, content, or whatsoever.

      From an historical point of view, case sensitivity has been the UNIX standard, some applications (HEAD, head...) have been programmed with case-sensitivity in mind and porting everything is a mess. Probably because to compute case-insensitivity is more costly than case-sensitivity.

      Nowadays some applications like OpenFOAM are a big PAIN to run under MacOS X due to case-sensitivity. Projects like Macports have to deal with case-sensitivity to insensitivity conversion all the time, lots of man hours that could have been spent somewhere else.

      Although not part from the UNIX spec, following this UNIX "standard" could help MacOS popularity in the research sector growth. From an UI search prespective, case-sensitivity it's not a problem and you can do all the extra computations there. UNIX is not going to change their "file system standard". Why sell MacOS as an UNIX system, when all the UNIX applications have to be revised before beeing able to run under MacOS due to the "case-insesitivity by default" choice?

  48. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by ctchristmas · · Score: 1

    Of course they accept trade ins. Their products generally cost you an arm and a leg, or your first born child. This new 12 core mac will cost both.

  49. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by alta · · Score: 1

    Just a disclaimer to make sure yall don't think I'm heartless. I have 2 kids of my own I'd never trade in. It's just those damn boys across the street that drive me nuts!

    Get off my grass!!

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  50. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iKid

  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Re: Apple product naming by wed128 · · Score: 1

    I always thought it stood for economy!

  53. Flash 10.1 supports the new hardware by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Adobe has assured its customers that Flash 10.1 will be able to "...make full use of the new machines. Flash will be able to utilize 100% of the 12 core hardware without fail. That's the reliability customers have come to expect from Adobe."

    Boot Camp users running Windows will have to deal with "compatibility issues" that might limit utilization to a mere 15-25%

    1. Re:Flash 10.1 supports the new hardware by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Adobe has assured its customers that Flash 10.1 will be able to "...make full use of the new machines. Flash will be able to utilize 100% of the 12 core hardware without fail.

      No shit, Flash is the only non-game application on my last-year iMac that manages to get the fans blowing at maximum speed (1080p video fullscreen on YouTube).

  54. Re:NO MATE Display and room for 1 HDD with no E-sa by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

    What if you already have a computer? Then it's a WHOLLY unjustified expense!

  55. Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you've just spent $6k on a new Mac Pro, and you *really* need USB-3, just spend another $40 and plug the card in. It's a Mac Pro. It has expansion ports. Use them and feel happy.

    ... and if you want e-sata, just buy an extender cable for the two extra on-board sata channels in the Mac Pro. That'll cost you the princely sum of $19.

    Sure, you can argue it ought to have come with them (and I'd agree, for what it's worth) but the cost of implementing it yourself is hardly the end of the world.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by rimcrazy · · Score: 0

      That's the point. I've just priced it and I can spend $2500 and get a 3.2Ghz Quad core with 12Gb Ram, 2Tb SATA III HD's, USB 3.0, FW800 and an NVIDIA FX3800. So why should I spend $6k for a Mac?

      --
      "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
    2. Re:Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      because $6k is for a 12-core machine, not a 4-core machine ?

      because the *software* is better ?

      because you'd be throwing away all that in-house expertise ?



      Or, maybe it's not for you. Your call, I couldn't really care less. I just don't think that $40 for a USB-3 port or two is any justification for that decision.

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    3. Re:Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by stewymcstewstew · · Score: 1

      Besides what Space cowboy said below:

      What kind of a CPU is that? If it's a quad core XEON at 3.2 ghz you're looking at around $1k for that part.

      Add another $400 or so for 12GB of ECC memory (which the mac pro uses).

      $400 or so for a systemboard supporting QPI.

      $850 or so for that video card.

      We are well over your $2500 figure and we haven't even looked at the hard drive, USB 3.0, FW800, case or PSU.

      Clearly you don't understand what a workstation really is. If you compare the mac pro price to other workstations on the market it is VERY competitively priced.

    4. Re:Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by dangitman · · Score: 1

      ... and if you want e-sata, just buy an extender cable [macsales.com] for the two extra on-board sata channels in the Mac Pro.

      What extra SATA channels on the Mac Pro? For the 2009 Mac Pro, they changed the optical drives from PATA to SATA, so those previously-unused channels are now used for the optical drives. I haven't seen the 2010 model yet, but I imagine the situation would be the same.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Two options:

      1) Use a single optical drive (I've never used 2 in a mac). That leaves you with a single e-sata connection

      2) Instead of the cable, buy This card for $6 more ($25).

      Again, it's a mac pro. Use the expansion slots and feel happy.

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    6. Re:Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by dangitman · · Score: 1

      2) Instead of the cable, buy This card [newegg.com] for $6 more ($25).

      Where does it say that this card is Mac compatible? When I found out my Mac Pro didn't have any spare SATA channels (I have a Blu-Ray and a DVD drive installed) I bought a couple of different models of eSATA card, but neither had Mac drivers, and would not work. The only option I found that explicitly mentioned Mac compatibility was an expensive one from a Mac specialist company (it was Newer or Sonnet, I think).

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Oh for [insert deity]'s sake by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      There's legion of them out there, for ~$25. If you click on the 'specifications' tab, it says "Mac OS X v10.4 Non-booting driver supported by SiliconImage SiI3132". If you want booting support, you'll have to look elsewhere, but when I attach $BIG_DISK, it's not normally for booting with...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  56. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by kenj0418 · · Score: 1

    ...get one of those damn kids out of my hair. Any takers? SHould I put them on craigslist or ebay?

    I don't think ebay allows that sort of thing -- so I guess craigslist.

  57. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    I like track pads. There are new drivers out that provide multi-touch on most track pads for the PC. This Apple offering isn't that interesting, except for its' size. The device, as with most Apple mice and keyboards should work on PCs, albeit without the multi-touch. It's a bit pricey though.

    The others have no interest to me. They are essentially the same products as the past but with a few more features. Certainly some are not worth the price. Crack open that display and you'll likely find a Samsung panel in it.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  58. Re:If i hear "magical" one more time... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    *Cues Camera in recording mode*

    My Mini-DVI to VGA cable is quite magical.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  59. ordered a trackpad by AnAdventurer · · Score: 1

    I hate the stupid magic-mice, well maybe its me that's stupid, I could never figure it out. I use one of those super trackballs but it's on it's last legs. I ordered the new track pad from Apple with the stupid name. I mean I like auto-magic as much as the next tech-junkie but I know its just computer stuff.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  60. Re:If i hear "magical" one more time... by theghost · · Score: 1

    I think i do see the reason - excess ego.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  61. Trackpad with builtin button is annoying by hcdejong · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I have a Macbook where the button is integrated in the trackpad. The pad is hinged at the top, which means that the force required to click increases as you get higher up on the trackpad. I've found the force becomes high enough to be uncomfortable, or at least noticeable.
    I found this annoying enough that I've ended up using two hands: left index finger for moving around, and the right index finger rests on the bottom of the trackpad for clicking.
    That's not ideal either: occasionally, a click (while the left index finger remains on the trackpad) gets interpreted as an option-click, which means two more clicks to remove the option menu and get the effect I wanted.

    In the end, I much prefer having two buttons physically separate from the trackpad.

    1. Re:Trackpad with builtin button is annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traditionally laptop trackpad buttons are position at the bottom on the pad, intended to be pressed with the thumb of the same hand that's navigating the trackpad. Apple's trackpad allows exactly the same usage. Even if you want to use your other hand or another digit to click the button, I don't see why having the button area also be a trackpad changes the situation.

      You say that you're getting errant clicks. First, you can selectively disable whatever sort of click you're generating false positives for, at the cost of having to press a key to get that sort of click, which is probably a fair trade if it's anything other than right-click. Second, if you use just one hand to do clicking you'll have better coordination (both temporally and spatially) and be less likely to activate the multi-touch features accidentally.

  62. Woohoo! by sjonke · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for them to release the Magic Trackpad - it's about damn time! Order placed. If you've used a recent Apple MacBook trackpad, you know why this is a great product. Or at least it should be. I hope it proves to be everything I expect.

    --
    --- What?
  63. where is the $1000-$1500 mini tower the imac is to by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    where is the $1000-$1500 mini tower the imac is to limited and comes with screen that you may not need or want (lack of screen choice is bad) and locking screen size to cpu power is bad as well.

    The video card in the imac are a little week for the screen size but ok for non gaming but the screen is not for photo shop work. But let us have 2 HDD's or add E-sata or usb 3.0 / firewire 1600 / 3200.

  64. Did some checking by Delarth799 · · Score: 0

    Well on the Apple website it says the base price of the 12-core machine will start at $4999. Super decked out and your looking at $20,000 to $25,000 for the damn computer. And it would probably only cost you about $5000 to $7000 to build it using your own parts.

    1. Re:Did some checking by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      What's the point of decking it out OEM? Buy as close to a base system as you can and then upgrade it with third party components as necessary. Saves money. That $20-25k price tag is when you stuff every OEM option available into it, for crying out loud. If you have that kind of money to throw around, you'd probably just buy the OEM for the sake of streamlined support.

    2. Re:Did some checking by Delarth799 · · Score: 0

      You do realize this was all done out of curiosity right, the whole POINT of that $25k price tag was to see what happens when you really deck it out with every high end option and every piece of software Apple offers you. A good $7,000 portion of that $25k price is software and warranty. Besides that the article jokes at taking out a second mortgage, I wanted to see if I could help since I was bored.

  65. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just FYI, Windows 7 has full multi-touch support. (Doesn't guarantee your applications will use it sensibly, but it's there.)

  66. Re:Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but on by PolarBearFire · · Score: 1

    Apple has NEVER cared about games. This is according to Valve... Apple always talks the talk but never follows through to make gaming on Macs important.

  67. Surface area vs Bezel area - not the same by dkh2 · · Score: 1

    Of course, what they're not telling you is that they obtained 80% more surface area by reshaping the surface.

    There's a HUGE difference between a surface with a linear cross section like this...

    ________________

    vs. the same linear width with this cross section... /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

    --
    My office has been taken over by iPod people.
  68. HTPCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the nicest pointing device I've seen so far for an HTPC.

    Mice suck when you don't have a desk. Wireless HTPC keyboards typically have joypad-button pointers (awful) or tiny trackpads stuck on the sides, so you have to hold the whole keyboard to use them.

    Having a really big, freestanding trackpad with back-forward gestures would make it a lot more fun to sit on a couch and use the "PC" part of an HTPC.

  69. Re:Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but on by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Because Apple expects that most of their customers are going to buy the base RAM, throw it away, and pour in third-party RAM.

  70. Carpal tunnel? by teeloo · · Score: 1

    The problem with a trackpad is that you cannot rest your hands anywhere on it, which is not a good thing. Has anyone had any bad experiences with trackpads with respect to repetitive strain ailments? I have been using the Kensington Expert Mouse for the past 15 years and as "heavy" mouse user, I have never had a problem with my wrists or elbows (ie - carpal tunnel syndrome). I cannot imagine ever switching.

    1. Re:Carpal tunnel? by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?? You can rest your hand on the trackpad any way you like. It only responds to movement. Try it...

  71. ...YET by llamafirst · · Score: 1

    At least they didn't call it,

    iMagic.

    Yet.

    It is prophesied! Or prophesized! Or prophephizizzle! Or whatever that word is!

    Someday I'll link back to this post and say we warned you all!!!!

  72. Apple site? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    TFA links to two blogs posts. There is nothing on Apple's site.

    Does nobody read past the headlines?

  73. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by BryanL · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are bad apples, so it is more of a recall.

  74. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they do. They take the kids and send them off to China to work in Foxconn factories.

  75. Magic Mouse vs. Multitouch by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Great. Now, can they enable the same features on the magic mouse without needing a third party driver? (Magicprefs). The magic mouse can register as much as 12 points if my memory serves me right, but they only natively enable 2-3 finger scrolling and swipes, not pinching and the other cool stuff. no, instead they just link to the third party app.

    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/system_disk_utilities/magicprefs.html

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  76. Not only faster, but with new trix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faster renders with techniques not practical on any other machine.

    The extended capabilities available to the early adopter gives them a jump on their competition

  77. Re:Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but on by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

    The screen itself is worth about $1k alone. Dell has been selling the exact same panel in a standalone display for $1050 for some time now. Also, you ask why. It's simple: Because people will buy it. In any case, this was a much bigger bump for the lower end iMacs. The 4670 on the low end may not be much, but it's a big step up from the damned 9400M they were using. Integrated graphics on a 1080p screen? The 5670 in the midrange is also a decent step up from the 4670. The 5750 is only going to be a tad faster than the 4850 they were using. The i3/i5 in the low-midrange systems will be a NICE improvement over the Core 2 Duos they were using, no doubt about that. An interesting thing to note is that Apple is using a 2.8ghz i5 quad. Did they special order that from Intel or something?

  78. Bamboo tablets have been there for years by loufoque · · Score: 1

    It's basically a bamboo tablet, except a bamboo tablet also works as a graphics tablet.

    There is nothing innovative about this, and claiming it is "The largest Multi-Touch trackpad ever" is just false.

  79. Also of interest by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    They announced a 27" Cinema display, bumped the iMacs, and appear to have given NVIDIA the boot.

  80. Use your thumb to click. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    The previous Mac laptops had a separate button at the bottom of the trackpad. This is why the new ones' buttonless design is like you point out: it works with the same muscular habits as the older ones. I was used to the old one, then when I got a newer model I adjusted very quickly (after I made the same assumption you did, though).

    I call it affordance fail, though: nothing about the design of the new pad makes it perceptible that the bottom edge is the clickable part.

  81. Touch is great for RSI by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    Touch products are great for RSI. That is why Fingerworks trackpads and keyboards were so popular with people who were having wrist problems.

    They discard 5-finger inputs so you can relax--I mean completely relax--your hand directly on the touchpad when you are not moving the mouse...even between movements. It is a very more natural relaxed position--all fingers curled naturally downward...just like resting your hand on a table.

    Movements on a touchpad take no force since you are only moving your fingers. Even light mice require more effort (tension) in your fingers to pinch and move. "Clicks" take only the most subtle of finger movements. Drags take no tension to hold down the button, since "drag" is a persistent state you invoke with a discrete gesture.

    There are also fewer reasons to move the mouse, since so much can be done with gestures. I'll have to see how many the "Magic Trackpad" support, but with my Fingerworks pad on my PC, I can open and close windows, open and close documents, print, find, drag, scroll, switch windows, etc via gestures.

    I was having a lot of problems with my right wrist, which is bad since I like to kayak for fun. After doing some research online I figured I would give a Fingerworks trackpad a try, and it has been a huge improvement for me. The above descriptions are my own thoughts about why it has been such a big help.

    I'm excited for the Magic Trackpad (despite its stupid name) because my Fingerworks pad cost $250 used on eBay, and it's hooked up to my PC. I was looking for one for my Mac, and $69 sounds a lot better.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  82. Tap to click by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    I switched mine to tap-to-click mode, in part because I was annoyed at the differing click pressures (as you note) and in part because the click is so loud. (and I am sometimes using my laptop next my sleeping wife)

    It took a little getting used to, but I find that it works very well. I never could stand tap to click on my PC laptops, but I like it a lot on my MacBook Pro. I ended up getting a used Fingerworks trackpad for my PC, and now I'll probably pick up a "Magic" trackpad for my iMac at work. So I'm fully sold on tap to click. :-)

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  83. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will it run Crysis?

  84. What now? "Magic?" (*Double-take*) by Torodung · · Score: 1

    Left the summary laughing (thinking it was a play on Jobs' "magical" comment), went to RTFA. OMG they're really calling the product "Magic?"

    Seriously, this is taking the Arthur C. Clarke quote a bit too far. Are we now saying that any sufficiently devolved consumer can't distinguish technology from magic?

    What the hell? Are they releasing a "Sorcerer's Apprentice" edition?

    I know plenty of Apple customers. Most have a firm grip on reality. This just seems mad. I hope it's a "code name."

    --
    Toro

    1. Re:What now? "Magic?" (*Double-take*) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot doesn't handle conditional sigs well, which is something I like to do, so I type it manually. I know where the preferences section is.

      --
      Toro, you feckless lackwit!

      (posted AC because this should rise above "0")

  85. if not for the screen and lack of better Ext-ports by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    if not for the screen and lack of better Ext-ports / room for more then 1 HDD then the Imac will work good for Photoshop.

    ECC is over kill and the lack of PRO video cards just does not fit.

    Try a $800-$1000 system for photo shop that is just as good as $2500 mac pro.

  86. I don't know... by symbolset · · Score: 1

    These look finely edited to me.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  87. Re:Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but on by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Yes would love a 4-8 core super mini with a gpu slot.
    Enjoy a real gpu with all the cores needed, max ram.
    We have to get a mac pro or nothing.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  88. The AMD chips are interesting by symbolset · · Score: 1

    For many workloads like VMHosting and rendering the AMD server 12-core chips do make great sense - especially if you're doing the free software too. These days the type of workload that requires both a lot of processing power and doesn't thread well is pretty rare. Except in the context of this discussion. Apple doesn't use AMD chips yet.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  89. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know Apple did Trade-ins for non Apple products.

    Oh ya , how else do u explain the inexplicable health recovery of steve

    they have resorted to sacrifices
    damn everyone knows kids r great for that

  90. it's almost an honor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    post smited by Jobshovah himself!

  91. Keyboard and trackpad separate... why? by Gadzeus · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the decision not to, at the very least, release a model with the keyboard & trackpad combined. In what situation will it be more practical to have them separate? For people with four arms, perhaps? Drummers with complete limb coordination independence?

    There is the rationale that keyboard and trackpad can fail independently but I don't think that justifies the inconvenience of their separation in a wireless, mobile product.

    Should we consider a modular design for cars? Hey, let's separate the steering wheel from the pedals and strap the customer into both halves to keep them together!

  92. Re:Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but on by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    Why would you buy a $2,000 workstation to play games?

    I've never had problems playing most games on $50-$75 video cards anyway. You just want a large, loud and underutilized penis occupying your PCIe slot so you can brag to your friends. For folks like you which are kinda like those tard kids that throw a fart cannon on a Honda and call it a racecar, I recommend sticking to cheap ass off the shelf PC gear and buying a $350 video card.

    The money in that machine isn't in the video card, it's everything else some piss-ant gamer like yourself will never take advantage of. There's a lot of us with real work to do for which this machine would be a godsend worth every penny.

    Because some tard kid who runs a pirated copy of Photoshop once in a while and plays games can't see the value, it doesn't mean it won't sell to a vast niche (people with jobs who require lots of computing power). This is a computer, not an entertainment device.

    That's as bad as the morons that claim OSX has no value over Windows. Anyone that says that usually uses computers for menial tasks like Word Processing and watching Youtube and no concept of what goes on under the hood.

    Besides, macs have PCIe slots too.....

  93. Re: Apple product naming by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    The Wikipedia claims the 'e' was indeed for education.

    Perhaps you're thinking of the Macintosh LC ("psst, 'low cost', but don't tell anyone"), which was the first modular Mac?

  94. Re:Why do cheaper Imacs have more base ram? but on by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    Besides, macs have PCIe slots too.....

    Sorry, at least MAC PROS do. I miss the flexible and reasonably expandable macs. That's why my primary desktop mac is a hackintosh, so I can add things like cheap M-Audio multichannel audio cards and such where going firewire would be prohibitively expensive (and not any better) on my budget and cause me to have to repurchase a lot of perfectly good working gear. I carry around a base-model 09 Macbook these days too though. I don't think their hardware is crap or even majorly overpriced cept the Macbook pros and a couple imacs, they just don't make a machine for me anymore on the desktop. Mac Pros are overkill for most of what I do and iMacs lack the expandability and durability I need. I actually miss the low-end and midrange G4 towers.

  95. still no USB3/SATA6gb :-( by chappel · · Score: 1

    I really don't need even four cores, but I'd sure love to have the option to move lots of data much faster. I can't remember the last time I waited more than a second or two for something to process (ok, I guess converting RAW to jpg would go faster) but it seems several times a week I'm moving mass quantities of data - photos, movies, backup images - and waiting for 30-60 or more minutes for USB or FW800, and lusting after BANDWIDTH. I was hoping Apple would cook in some rockin' fast bit shuffling, rather than spending $3000 on a machine, then more to band-aid on a faster interface card.

    I'd be all over a 'mini Pro' - let me keep my monitor between upgrades, and add a card or two to customize it to what I need, and update with the times without a forklift.

  96. Re:I'm selling my neighbors kids to get one of the by asliarun · · Score: 1

    They are bad apples, so it is more of a recall.

    Nonetheless, for the neighbors, they are the apples of their i.

  97. johan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HI Really nice and funny thought... cheap hotels-Find cheap hotel and hotel deals . Book hotels online and save big on cheap hotel in the US and worldwide destinations Kind regards Johan

  98. I want one! by dan.henriksen · · Score: 1

    Once agin Apple maks a design icon! Dan

  99. 12 processing cores, it's outstanding! by MadisonMore · · Score: 1

    Apple said 'Mac® Pro line with up to 12 processing cores and up to 50 percent greater performance than the previous generation'. It's amazing. It should be super fast for designers and video editors. And my mouse will give place to Magic Trackpad. **** iPod Transfer software for Mac http://www.ipodmactransfer.com/