Slashdot Mirror


Sony Has Lost the PS3 Hacking War

YokimaSun writes "Sony may have dealt a major blow to the PSjailbreak sellers, but the release last week of PSGroove, an open source version of the hack, has now opened the floodgates of ports to mobile phones such as the Nokia N900 and Palm Pre. The final kick in the teeth is that a port of the exploit has been released by Waninkoko of Wii custom firmware fame for the Dingoo Handheld, which is a homebrew console that is very popular amongst emulation fans. It makes you smile that you can use one homebrew console to hack another to get homebrew on that console. Awesome." pudge notes that you can apparently do the same with a TI-84 Plus graphing calculator (YouTube video).

322 comments

  1. The only thing Waninkoko is famous for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only thing Waninkoko is famous for is not thinking before releasing things. He put out a USB .iso loader, for example, that made the pirating possible on a large scale and caused Nintendo to step up patching the Team Twiizers hacks. Don't paint him as a god! He didn't even make any "Custom Firmware", only a few patches to the wii's system menu.

    1. Re:The only thing Waninkoko is famous for... by marcansoft · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even worse, he's directly responsible for bricking hundreds of consoles due to shoddy code (his "custom updater" and "custom downgrader" saga; at one point running one of his tools bricked your console 100% of the time) and generally speaking hasn't made any contributions to homebrew, instead opting to cobble together pieces of homebrew code to make pirac^H^H^H^H^Hbackup tools, often without following the licences.

      He's only jumping on the PS3 bandwagon to get some attention, which is something he loves. If he ever releases anything halfway meaningful for the PS3, I can pretty much guarantee it'll be a port or simple combination of existing tools in a slightly more "marketable" way, with a "healthy" dose of his sponsor's logos, as his Wii releases always have been.

      True story: he released his USB loader about 20-30 days after someone actually wrote a high-speed USB driver, which was the final piece of the puzzle. For kicks, after his announcement but before the release, I proceeded to independently create an equivalent USB loader, to gauge how much work had to go into it. ~200 lines of code and 6 hours, not counting time spent writing a silly menu and slapping in logos.

    2. Re:The only thing Waninkoko is famous for... by FrangoAssado · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why is this modded troll? Anyone who follows the Wii homebrew scene knows Waninkoko has been very disruptive to people who want to write and run homebrew code without having anything to do with piracy.

      See also for example this post from another Homebrew Channel developer. And this from marcan (presumably the parent) about how he wrote an USB loader in 6 hours just to show it's no big deal, given everything other people had already done.

    3. Re:The only thing Waninkoko is famous for... by xtracto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah... I have followed the Wiiscene for quite some time (including the demise of TehSkeen, Marcan's whiny rants,etc ) and some "scene" guys are angry at Waninkoko/Wiigator, etc because they release stuff allowing to run backups.

      See, there is a certain segment of the WiiScene which are a bunch of Mother Theressas and the only mention of backup launcher gets their panties in a bunch.

      Other segment just do not see software itself as "evil" or bad and use whatever tools there are to increase the functionality of the console (as other person commented in this story for the PS3, it is good being able to rip your games into a USB drive).

      And of course there is people who use such tools to steal software.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:The only thing Waninkoko is famous for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still trolling...

      he wrote an USB loader in 6 hours just to show it's no big deal

      And then wrote a trolling article about it. Waninkoko may base his work around code written by other people (that's what nearly all programers do). The thing is that he produces something that people like and want. An idea is only of any use if someone can finish it off properly

    5. Re:The only thing Waninkoko is famous for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, there is a certain segment of the WiiScene which are a bunch of Mother Theressas and the only mention of backup launcher gets their panties in a bunch.

      This "certain segment" would be that surrounding hackmii.com, wiibrew.org, and the homebrew channel, the makers of the only long-standing ways to get homebrew onto the Wii. And, by the way, the active installed userbase of that segment is, according to a recent count, 266,440 strong. Considering it a minority is not the way to go. And in the grandparent of your post, marcan himself points out the well-known fact that waninkoko's tools are not safe to run. Stick that in your Wii's slot and run it; you'll find the results somewhat similar to crack in humans.

      Other segment just do not see software itself as "evil" or bad and use whatever tools there are to increase the functionality of the console (as other person commented in this story for the PS3, it is good being able to rip your games into a USB drive).

      And of course there is people who use such tools to steal software.

      What the heck else are you going to do with a backup of your own game? I mean, if you have a tendency to lose disks or scratch them, then that is by far not the best solution! Try grabbing the disks by the edges or keeping them all in one case...

      I've wasted enough time rebutting your post; I have a life to attend to.

  2. Lost the war? by socsoc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe this battle was a loss, but as long as Song can force firmware updates, the war is far from over.

    There's aslo an iOS version being made that'll run from a jailbroken iPhone.

    1. Re:Lost the war? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Nice typos too. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Lost the war? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I'm guessing that they're going to have another massive lawsuit on their hands if they follow through with their threats to disable portions of the PS3 as a response. It was questionable to say the least when they started releasing PS3s without all the chips that the first gen PS3s had, but now that they're apparently removing features from consoles that people have already purchased, they're going to be in a world of hurt.

    3. Re:Lost the war? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      You can blame the auto correction on an iPhone and my failure to correctly preview...

    4. Re:Lost the war? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Sure, blame something. [grin]

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:Lost the war? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      ... as long as Song can force firmware updates ...

      So you are saying it ain't over until the fat Jap sings?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:Lost the war? by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      History disagrees. I'm sure there's a Dilbert strip in this somewhere.

    7. Re:Lost the war? by AnEducatedNegro · · Score: 1

      don't connect to the playstation network and you won't get the firmware upgrades. they patch a flaw for security reasons and they tell you this if you connect to psn. keep a standalone ps3 and you can mod to your hearts content. this is why i owned 2 xbox 360s

    8. Re:Lost the war? by NoZart · · Score: 1

      Care to share a Link?
      All i find are infos on Android, N900, TI ports. And a twitter statement from Mathieulh (PSP and PS3 hacker) that there will be no iOS port. Which would be sad.

    9. Re:Lost the war? by Andorin · · Score: 1

      > don't connect to the playstation network and you won't get the firmware upgrades.
      Or play any new games.

      > they patch a flaw for security reasons and they tell you this if you connect to psn.
      Yeah, the security of their ability to control your device.

      > keep a standalone ps3 and you can mod to your hearts content. this is why i owned 2 xbox 360s
      You shouldn't have to buy two consoles just to exercise your consumer rights.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    10. Re:Lost the war? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Or play any new games."

      USB Update

      "Yeah, the security of their ability to control your device."

      Non-existent right now, minus the loss of OtherOS.

      "You shouldn't have to buy two consoles just to exercise your consumer rights."

      Very true. instead, you should be getting off your butt and trying to find a class-action being filed near you and join in on it. The more that can speak out against this crap the more the government will be forced to stop this shit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Lost the war? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I expect Sony has quite a few effective tricks left. Some are carrot, some are stick:
      • Patch the cause of this bug so it doesn't work anymore. Plan B would be to sniff for USB attacks and flag the system
      • Ensure hack doesn't work on new models (duh)
      • Mandatory updates to firmware. Some of these could contain things people want such as 3D support. If Sony were smart they might even toss in MKV support.
      • Random game & firmware checks which flag hacked software or signs of hacking such as iso files
      • Increase the amount of multiplayer content & after sale support in games (free content, patches etc.) things the pirates will never get.
      • Permabans by the shovelful for anyone stupid enough to put their PS3 online.
      • Changes to the TRC so games are required to fill every last byte of disc space with junk, repeated characters, corrupted data. The purpose being to make it hard for iso rippers & file sharers by making isos 25 or 50gb each.

      I'm sure there are other measures, the purpose of which is to diminish the value in modding a PS3 and making it a hassle if you do.

    12. Re:Lost the war? by halfaperson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sony cannot force anyone to plug an ethernet cable into their ps3. Sure, they can exclude you from PSN, but a lot of us aren't really into online play anyway.

      --
      Jesus had a UNIX beard.
    13. Re:Lost the war? by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      For the record I agree with you. Sony cannot reach out and force an update. I've made that argument a few times.

      However, they can (and do) release new games and blu-ray's that require these firmware updates to play. Refusing a given firmware update serves to immediately boot you from PSN, and prevent you from using any software released after that update. Even if you are only interested in offline play.

    14. Re:Lost the war? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Sony probably has a whole office filled with lawyers to deal with such annoyances. And if they even suspected there was any threat of such a lawsuit, they would just quietly "encourage" a friendly outside lawyer to launch a class-action suit. He would get a nice payday, the consumers would get some worthless coupons, and Sony would be indemnified from any further lawsuits on the matter.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It makes you smile that you can use one homebrew console to hack another to get homebrew on that console. Awesome.

    First of all, this is just used for pirating purposes. In fact that's the only thing the hack allows, so drop the homebrew bullshit.

    Secondly, Sony has lost the PS3 hacking war? These hacks are fully detectable by PS3 and Sony. Those who have used them have already been banned from PSN and multiplayer games. What a great way to ruin your expensive console.

    u just don't "get it"

  4. Palm Pre by spire3661 · · Score: 0

    Saw a video of a palm pre hacking the PS3 yesterday.

    --
    Good-bye
    1. Re:Palm Pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without a link, this deserves no more than a "Cool story bro".

    2. Re:Palm Pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, you expect me to believe that somebody actually OWNS a Palm Pre?

  5. Ridiculous submission by Goaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The hack exploits a bug in the USB code on the PS3. A firmware update will render every single one those hack versions useless.

    That's nowhere near a victory of any kind.

    1. Re:Ridiculous submission by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what I was thinking as well! Who the hell are these idiots who seem not to know anything about which they submit stories?
      I admit I haven't RTFA, but I watched the video and it clearly is something workable by the means of a Firmware update. This war is as lost as the PSP war was before they found out about Pandora...

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    2. Re:Ridiculous submission by Andorin · · Score: 1

      > A firmware update will render every single one those hack versions useless.

      Then why hasn't Sony released one yet? If it's so trivial to patch the flaw you'd think they would have done so by now.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    3. Re:Ridiculous submission by cf18 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The bug is in the USB stack so it is easy to fix. Future game releases will requires the firmware update. What I wonder is if Sony will go further and brick your PS3 if the new game detects a plugged in exploit device?

    4. Re:Ridiculous submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You underestimate the consequences of this. To do anything exotic you would need to change the shellcode to launch your own unsigned bootloader instead of tricking the Sony system software into thinking we have a Jig; but if you do, you have complete control.

      With more development, you could fake it perfectly - the PS3's own security capabilities (that were used to such effect in the OtherOS hypervisor that needed a hardware glitch to even come close to breaking) can also be used against it, to stealth DNAS and firmware updates and make any changes we like to the running code, undetectably.

      An SPU in security mode is latched off the bus so that the CPU and other SPUs can't tamper with it. DNAS has to blindly trust it is running signed code - and that trust root is now gone, because if it isn't, and it lies, it lies convincingly. This is a design flaw in the trust root of Sony's DNAS ("Dynamic Network Authentication System") DRM - which actually encompasses the entire corpus of copy protection technologies on the PS3, including the clock (really), code signing, anti-cheat, disc authentication, rental timeouts (hence the clock), online store, update signing, (some) peripheral authentication, region lockouts (where enabled), console/disc unique IDs, Blu-Ray ROM-Mark, AACS and BD+ - and it's (of course) a fundamentally unfixable one. Once you've cracked the eggshell (so to speak), it's easier to root the PS3 on an ongoing basis than it is (say) the Xenon.

      Plus, you now have complete firmware dumps for all components available without decapping, so you could maybe extend that hack to any future versions by simply finding new bugs in those dumps. This is the beginning, not the end, but it's the breakthrough that was being waited for, the one hole that opens the floodgates.

      And let's face it, by being assholes and removing advertised features like OtherOS (and, I suppose, PS2 compatibility when the software is fully capable of it), Sony had it coming.

    5. Re:Ridiculous submission by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      It's trivial - it's a hole in GameOS (lv-2), which is part of updates and nowhere near the early bootloaders. They're probably working through their very first case of "oh-shit-we-need-to-patch-this-now" bureaucracy. They'll get faster for upcoming iterations of the exploit-patch-release cycle.

    6. Re:Ridiculous submission by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I keep reading paranoid shit like this, like, "is Sony going to brick your PS3/PSP over x, y, or z?"

      the answer is fucking no.

      the answer is always fucking no.

      if you do something to your PSP or PS3 that compromises the FLASH and the update happens to brick it, it's not their goddamned fault.

      (I have a PSP with a dead flash that's randomly bluescreening but that ain't due to Sony magically destroying my FLASH1 from the ether)

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    7. Re:Ridiculous submission by marcansoft · · Score: 4, Informative

      The exploit has nothing to do with Sony's service jig. It uses the service jig code as a handy way to stash 64 bytes into memory, but it neither passes jig auth nor does anything related to what the jig does at Sony's repair centers. In fact, I think the exploit could be reworked not to emulate a device with the jig's ID at all. The core exploit relies on random (non-specific unidentified vendor) USB devices with wacky descriptors.

      The exploit also only has permissions at lv-2 level (GameOS). Breaking into lv-1 will require extra work, and breaking into the secure SPU is still impractical.

    8. Re:Ridiculous submission by Goaway · · Score: 1

      but if you do, you have complete control.

      I am not at all convinced that is true. Pretty sure you don't have control over the hypervisor. And you certainly don't have any way to stop Sony from doing mandatory upgrades. Sure, you can take your own machine off the net, but new machines aren't going to be vulnerable.

    9. Re:Ridiculous submission by feepness · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then why hasn't Sony released one yet? If it's so trivial to patch the flaw you'd think they would have done so by now.

      Because they have careful testing and actually care about not breaking shit?

    10. Re:Ridiculous submission by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      ->And you certainly don't have any way to stop Sony from doing mandatory upgrades
      Actually, I thought the upgrade proxy hack (fooling the ps3 into thinking it was running the latest firmware) had been knocking around since before geohotz, lots of people were talking about using it to keep Linux/OtherOS working and still letting them play online, but the web seems short of legit info these days (to many take down notices I guess :(.)

    11. Re:Ridiculous submission by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      An existing machine on the net might work, though, if you can get control over the hypervisor.

      Run your own hypervisor, and then underneath that, Sony's runs. Sony can update whatever they want below your hypervisor - your hypervisor is still there, feeding incorrect data to Sony's hypervisor.

    12. Re:Ridiculous submission by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Eh, firmware updates also reversed piracy on the PSP, but that console aint exactly piracy free.

    13. Re:Ridiculous submission by EdIII · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge it didn't though. The Pandora battery is what allows you to install custom firmware regardless it there is an official firmware on the unit in the first place.

      Sony never released a firmware update that could patch that since it was on the battery. Their attempt to stop it was to release batteries that could not be used that way. Of course you can still get the batteries.

      In the early days I absolutely remember that Sony released some official updates that prevented custom firmware for quite some time.

    14. Re:Ridiculous submission by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I keep reading paranoid shit like this, like, "is Sony going to brick your PS3/PSP over x, y, or z?"

      Two Words. Sony Rootkit.

      That was not paranoia, but cold hard fact. Granted, it has been awhile, but since no executives went to Federal Pound Me In The Ass prison over it I doubt they learned their lesson. As supported by the facts, the corporate culture over at Sony has always been one that does not respect the consumer's rights or property in any way, shape, or form.

      To wonder if Sony would deliberately modify your property to suit their business concerns isn't exactly paranoia.

      Anything Sony would do deliberately aside, I do agree that if the cause of the bricked unit is software that you uploaded (not Sony detecting it and bricking it), it would not be Sony's fault.

    15. Re:Ridiculous submission by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Did you upgrade?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    16. Re:Ridiculous submission by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Sony's done that all of exactly once, and it wasn't even Sony who did it. They outsourced the software.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    17. Re:Ridiculous submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you wouldn't run Sony updates on the device. It becomes a local-player-only machine, if you don't want to be banned or anything. Leave the device at it's current firmware. In other scenes, updates are made available moments after an official one comes out that leaves the hacks in place.

    18. Re:Ridiculous submission by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Insightful. So far, every hysterical post or story about anyone deliberately bricking ANYTHING has turned out to be horseshit. Wake me up when we can be honestly, impartially angry with someone (that's what we all want, isn't it?)

    19. Re:Ridiculous submission by smash · · Score: 1

      What sony DID do is release a new version of the PSP slim with different video driver (2002? i think - i have one - originally could not hack it) which did break the Pandora battery + stick hack for a while.

      Or appeared to - what was actually happening was that the video hardware driver didn't work with the new hardware - once the new driver was installed into the memory stick image in newer versions of the hack, it worked (mine has been successfully hacked with a newer software).

      If you knew the keypresses to push without being able to see, the older hack DID work on the 2002 PSP. You just couldn't see what you were doing...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    20. Re:Ridiculous submission by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      The PSP has weak DRM combined to the PS3. If anything it was just practice for them.

    21. Re:Ridiculous submission by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Ding. Usually what'll happen is is that the manufacturer will put out a firmware upgrade that will wipe out your customizations and leave you with a mostly stock unit with the latest firmware.

      Cute story; my iPhone 3G was jailbroken the day it was out of warranty. So I played around with some of the custom carrier string options. I upgraded to a 3GS and until I jailbroke it again and fixed it, the carrier string said BATFONE.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    22. Re:Ridiculous submission by Andorin · · Score: 1

      Even though they outsourced the software, they were still responsible for it. They even denied at first that they'd done anything wrong.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    23. Re:Ridiculous submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have - firmware 3.42 has just come out and is mandatory.

    24. Re:Ridiculous submission by Khyber · · Score: 1

      There is still the USB D+ trace overcurrent futzing still working.

      Good luck getting around that.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re:Ridiculous submission by Khyber · · Score: 0

      That's bullshit. We've already seen two major problems with the PS3. First, they broke BC and OtherOS. Then we also had that whole fucked up disconnect/system time glitch.

      Care about not breaking shit, my ass.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re:Ridiculous submission by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "breaking into the secure SPU is still impractical."

      Solder-on modchip.

      Just wait.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re:Ridiculous submission by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I doubt they would for fear of class actions, but they could certainly flag a device. Imagine for example that Sony patched the bug but put logging in whenever it detected an attack. Next time you connect to PSN, the log could go with it, notifying Sony of the precise time and dates you tried to use an exploit. Sony could easily wield the banhammer on such people, preventing the machine from ever being used to connect to PSN again. The threat of removal of PSN access would be an extremely effective deterrent.

    28. Re:Ridiculous submission by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Good luck using that for anything actually useful.

    29. Re:Ridiculous submission by Tukz · · Score: 1

      woooosh

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    30. Re:Ridiculous submission by Fumus · · Score: 1

      They are waiting for people to rush and buy PS3 hoping to use the exploit to run otherwise too expensive games. They will update the firmware in a week when word gets round of the exploit and pirates will buy the consoles.

    31. Re:Ridiculous submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have. 3.42.

    32. Re:Ridiculous submission by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      I keep reading paranoid shit like this, like, "is Sony going to brick your PS3/PSP over x, y, or z?"

      Two Words. Sony Rootkit.

      That was not paranoia, but cold hard fact. Granted, it has been awhile, but since no executives went to Federal Pound Me In The Ass prison over it I doubt they learned their lesson. As supported by the facts, the corporate culture over at Sony has always been one that does not respect the consumer's rights or property in any way, shape, or form.

      To wonder if Sony would deliberately modify your property to suit their business concerns isn't exactly paranoia.

      Anything Sony would do deliberately aside, I do agree that if the cause of the bricked unit is software that you uploaded (not Sony detecting it and bricking it), it would not be Sony's fault.

      Sony is also a large corporation with many divisions, which sometimes work at cross-purposes.

      Sony Music Entertainment is the division behind the rootkit disaster.

      Sony Computer Entertainment Japan/Europe/America is the division that produces the PS3.

      You would have been better off referencing the removal of the Other OS feature, as that was by the same division.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    33. Re:Ridiculous submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if it makes you feel better, the US didn't make any nukes to drop on Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
      They outsourced it to some scientists with funny accents.

    34. Re:Ridiculous submission by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      You mean, "care about not breaking shit they don't intend to break".

      The removal of OtherOS was very much planned, of course, but it still counts as "breaking my shit" as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    35. Re:Ridiculous submission by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point entirely.

      One time in another market that's not even related to SCEx they did something now you're suspicious that they're goign to brick your ps3/psp/toaster oven.

      That's probably clinical paranoia.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    36. Re:Ridiculous submission by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      Unless your modchip can hook into internal buses in the Cell silicon die, you won't get anywhere. The secure SPU runs entirely off of internal SRAM.

  6. It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're making a whole lot of assumptions. Following the news of this exploit, there's been no evidence of reaction from Sony beyond the lawyer attacks on distributors. It's true the commercial product is designed for backups (which may be used for piracy, but aren't necessarily), but it does allow adding other code - including homebrew. There simply isn't any around yet. I've been looking into the code injected to see if I can figure out a way to replace it with a Linux bootloader, and so far, this looks doable (but far from easy).

    So, 1) this is not *just* used for pirating. 2) that is not all it allows. 3) you're the first I've seen spouting the rumour of people being banned from PSN for this. 4) Sony went right ahead and "ruined" the console months ago.
    Sony have taken a surprisingly long time to react on the firmware side of things - they were quicker than this to kill Other OS when they weren't even threatened and knew the attack would have no positive effect.
    I have been effectively banned for much less reason, however - insisting on keeping functionality I bought the machine for. SCE started the attack on me back in April, and I'm trying to regain what they've unrightfully removed.

    If SCE had any interest in goodwill, they could release an update that reenables Other OS. Contrary to some spurious claims, the function required no extra work on their part - they only made changes to it to prevent Linux from getting "too good" at graphics, which is frankly laughable. It also didn't need removal to fit newer features, as it only existed on models with larger flash in the first place. If Other OS continued working as it should, I'd have no reason to spend so much effort on these exploits.

    1. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by gilesjuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this was the iPhone people would call this Jailbreaking and be claiming it is just allowing them to choose what software is on the device.

      I don't understand why it's fine on the iPhone yet on a games console it is deemed to be a bit more 'dodgy'. Especially when jailbreaking an iPhone also allows pirate software to be installed.

    2. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by partyguerrilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Homebrew applications and a "cheap" Cell SDK, for starters.

    3. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must know the wrong crowd, because the only reason anyone has brought up jailbreaking an iPhone in conversation with me was to use pirated apps.

    4. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by feepness · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand why it's fine on the iPhone yet on a games console it is deemed to be a bit more 'dodgy'. Especially when jailbreaking an iPhone also allows pirate software to be installed.

      Because there's tons of free and useful software for the iPhone. While there may be some for the PS3, it's definitely not a multi-purpose device.

    5. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because there's tons of free and useful software for the iPhone. While there may be some for the PS3, it's definitely not a multi-purpose device.

      I haven't seen a lot of useful stuff in the Cydia store. There are a handful of moderately useful things, hundreds of themes, and a lot of stuff which, by all appearences, is pretty useless and would probably be approved by Apple if the developer bothered to submit it.

      There isn't much available for the PS3 right now because the jailbreak just freaking happened. Give it time. If someone can port a decent media center (like XBMC) to the PS3, that alone would be reason enough to mod it. Not to mention, as I posted elsewhere, the possibility of restoring OtherOS and PS2 emulation.

    6. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Goaway · · Score: 1

      How do you boot a homebrew application on it?

    7. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While there may be some for the PS3, it's definitely not a multi-purpose device.

      One could say the same thing about an unjailbroken iPhone. Especially before the third party scene forced Apple to implement some obviously missing features.

      The PS3 is only not a multi-purpose device because Sony keeps trying to force it to be that way.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    8. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by pecosdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure what side of the pond you're on, but here in the U.S. about the only legitimate way to use an iPhone is not only to buy into Apple's hubris, but to buy into AT&T's also. Many people jailbreak iPhones so they can use T-Mobile or some other carrier, and from all reports I've heard they're better off for doing it.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    9. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That's not what Sony claims.

    10. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by besalope · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to deny the fact this is primarily for pirating; however the how banning on PSN is based off Sony detecting the app running on the console from the 'hack' program. If I read sources correctly the FOSS version allows you to change the AppID or naming on the console to the actual game's, which looks legit to Sony/PSN and circumvents their "protections."

    11. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Intended purpose. If both systems had no restrictions on software that was run, what would most people install that is not currently allowed. I'd argue that iphone would get more freeware/ custom software not allowed in the store. For the playstation, one can not honestly argue that most people would use the new openness for home brewed games and alternative operating systems. However, I do agree that in principle it is the same thing: allowing the owner of a piece of hardware run the software of his choosing. And I am in favor of that, regardless of the consequences of those who do not respect copyrights.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    12. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Because people who jailbreak iPhones are clearly doing it to pirate software, whereas that would never happen on the PS3.

    13. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You sound like someone who never saw xbmc on the original xbox. I've been waiting a long time for something similar on this gen of consoles and it looks like it'll be here pretty soon

    14. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by marcansoft · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There is no "cheap" Cell SDK that is usable for the PSJailbreak. It allows booting apps... that were compiled using the leaked official SDK (much like the "Backup Manager" that they offer was). There are no libraries in existence currently that would enable people to compile for the PS3 using GCC and the like, and the PSJailbreak also does not allow reinstatement of Other OS because they blew their chance at incorporating that functionality into the dongle, and it can't be done using purely application software.

      There probably will be legit homebrew for the PS3 at some stage, but the PSJailbreak is certainly more about piracy than anything else.

    15. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      The PSJailbreak has nothing to do with jailbreaking. Just because they took the term and used it doesn't mean this is morally, technically, or practically equivalent or even remotely similar to iPhone jailbreaks.

    16. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You don't suppose the fact that Sony requires developers to pay them for the privilege and that up until now there's been no way of developing for it? It seems a bit premature to make that sort of assertion given the limited opportunity to do homebrew for the PS3. Even when the other OS feature was still there, if I'm not mistaken, you couldn't make use of the entire PS3.

    17. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by jonwil · · Score: 1

      If it can be done via the dongle with extra hardware or USB tricks, there is no reason you couldn't presumably make the PS3Jailbreak clones for Palm Pre, N900 etc do whatever this missing piece is.

    18. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Narishma · · Score: 1

      PS2 emulation was only removed from the PS3 models that lack the necessary hardware pieces, so I don't know how it could possibly be restored. I don't think the PS3 is powerful enough to enable 100% software emulation, else Sony would have done it a long time ago and saved themselves a lot of money in the process.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    19. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If SCE had any interest in goodwill, they could release an update that reenables Other OS. Contrary to some spurious claims, the function required no extra work on their part

      Sure it was a evil move to put a stop to the Other OS funcitonality, but saying it doesn't require work to keep is pushing it a bit far. At very least it is a QA requirement for every new firmware, and to be honest who knows what they needed to do to the hypervisor when they updated the rest of the firmware.

      Your claim that it is no work is spurious unless you can provide evidence to the contrary. Removal of the Other OS feature was bad enough that for all of the known reasons without needing to add completely speculative claims to the mix.

    20. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because people who jailbreak iPhones are clearly doing it to pirate software, whereas that would never happen on the PS3.

      No. Myself, and many of my iPhone-using friends have jailbroken their phones. All of my friends that have done so, have done it to use their iPhones on networks other than AT&T, and to run open-source apps they download from Cydia and other services. There is no pirating involved. Based on word of mouth, and the fact that Cydia and other services are so popular and have so much development activity, it looks like most other people who jailbreak their iPhones are *also* doing it for these purposes. I don't even know how you actually pirate software from the App Store.

    21. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      PS3 is way powerful enough to emulate ps2.

      PS2
        * CPU: Emotion Engine 300MHz, 128-bit INT, 128-bit FP, 24KB L1, 16KB Scratch, 8KB VU0, 32KB VU1, 450 MIPS, 6.2 GFLOPS, 66M Vertices/Sec, 2.4 GB/s Internal, 1.2 GB/s Graphics, 3.2 GB/s Memory
              * Graphics: Sony GS 150MHz, 1.2G Texels/Sec, 32-bit Color, 4MB (48 GB/s), 1.2 GB/sec Bus
              "PlayStation 3 (PS3 Colors)"

      PlayStation 3 (PS3 Colors)
      Sony Computer Entertainment America
      (Continued from Page 2)
      PlayStation 3 Specifications and Details

      Product name: PLAYSTATION 3

      CPU: Cell Processor

              * PowerPC-base Core @3.2GHz
              * 1 VMX vector unit per core
              * 512KB L2 cache
              * 7 x SPE @3.2GHz
              * 7 x 128b 128 SIMD GPRs
              * 7 x 256KB SRAM for SPE
              * * 1 of 8 SPEs reserved for redundancy total floating point performance: 218 GFLOPS

      GPU: RSX @550MHz

              * 1.8 TFLOPS floating point performance
              * Full HD (up to 1080p) x 2 channels
              * Multi-way programmable parallel floating point shader pipelines

      Sound: Dolby 5.1ch, DTS, LPCM, etc. (Cell-base processing)

      Memory:

              * 256MB XDR Main RAM @3.2GHz
              * 256MB GDDR3 VRAM @700MHz

      System Bandwidth:

              * Main RAM: 25.6GB/s
              * VRAM: 22.4GB/s
              * RSX: 20GB/s (write) + 15GB/s (read)
              * SB: 2.5GB/s (write) + 2.5GB/s (read)

      System Floating Point Performance: 2 TFLOPS

    22. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Try to use a Playstation 2 emulator on a fast PC (hint: most quad-core processors can't do it smoothly). The performance penalty for emulation is bigger than you think, especially when you have to emulate both a processor and a GPU.

      On top of the raw horsepower problem, the 7-vector-core Cell processor is ill-suited to the task of emulating the single-threaded PS2 processor.

    23. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Schadrach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically, the exploit allows the execution of arbitrary code, there's even a fork of PSGroove that's a rewrite to make changing the payload easier. Also, PSGroove doesn't support the backup manager as is (though it's trivial to make it do so), while still allowing the installation of arbitrary PKG files.

      Literally, now that homebrew is possible, it's just a matter of time until there's an SDK that produces package files compatible with dev kit mode and thus an unmodified PSJailbreak.

    24. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Nursie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, what the hell?

      Technically - it's using a flaw in the system to be able to run unsigned code, it's almost identical to an iPhone jailbreak.

      Practically - It's just been announced in the last couple of weeks, so there's no SDK yet, let alone a software "scene"

      Morally? what are you smoking? It's exactly the fscking same deal.

    25. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I never even intended to use any of the online features (that's what my PC is for)... I bought a used PS3 because I wanted to play a certain console-exclusive single player game. I chose PS3 over Xbox360 because they both had the game I wanted, and the PS3 also had OtherOS.

      They took OtherOS away, so I never updated, and never connected to PSN. I wasn't going to buy any of their shit anyway. Just look at how bad they can screw you over -- INSTALL THIS UPDATE THAT DISABLES XYZ FEATURE OR YOU CAN NEVER USE THE CONTENT YOU PAID FOR EVER AGAIN!

      Fucking asshats, Sony. Well they are defeated now.. I can play all the other single player games I might have ever wanted with my PS3 that I will never update (until the new hacked firmware come out), and I never have to pay Sony another dime. I won't ever get banned if I never connect! HA HA! And no doubt, the hacks will eventually mature enough where they become undetectable..

      PS3 section has been open for 1 day and already 20+ titles ripped. **checks download** :)

    26. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      Of course, but the PSJailbreak device (as sond by distributors) cannot (and, as far as I can tell, is not updatable).

    27. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      Technically - jailbreaking is a specific technical term that means escaping a filesystem jail. Jailbreaking an iPhone exposes your iPhone's root filesystem with root privileges via an AFC share via USB (as opposed to the regular data share that exists on stock iPhones). This is the origin of the term. None of this applies to the PS3.

      Practically - iPhone jailbreaking was initially a means to load native code on the iPhone (before Apple had an SDK) and loading unapproved native code is still its primary goal, as evidenced by Cydia being the main application installed by jailbreaks. A common secondary goal is carrier unlocking. Piracy does exist, but it is generally not endorsed by the people behind jailbreaks, and installing piracy tools and pirated apps is left entirely up to the user. The PSJailbreak is primarily a piracy device, as there is no homebrew SDK, none was provided, and the only provided application (which was created with Sony's leaked SDK) is a game copier.

      Morally - the PSJailbreak is a for-profit device sold at a hugely inflated price (actual cost is more like $5-$10) with the knowledge that it will be rendered useless with the next firmware update (which, in fact, just came out: 3.42), in order to make a quick buck. iPhone jailbreaks are free (except for scammers who try to sell them).

    28. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      1. I wasn't aware Jailbreaking was a particular technical term. I don't believe it is, in fact, that specific.

      2. The primary goal is not a practical issue. Loading unapproved native code is the practical upshot of the PS3 jailbreak.

      3. PS3 Jailbreaks are now free as well, thanks to PSGroove (you need a programmable USB stick) and PSFreedom for the N900 and various other devices. What's more the free versions are not shipping with the backup manager as this is non-free. Getting it, using it and how itis used is an exercise left to the user and their own moral code. On top of that not only have there been stories of widespread app piracy on jailbroken iPhones, but that the PS3 hack is in its very early stages so you can't expect a thriving software environment yet.

      I'm sorry, but they are effectively identical.

    29. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Hint: PCSX2 only utilizes 2 cores, so trying to run it on anything more is the dumbest thing you can do.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    30. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Chalk up another guy who jailbroke an iOS device solely for Cydia apps (no piracy.)

      I don't get piracy, but then I make enough to buy pretty much all of the software I want. I don't have a use for the big expensive packages, and the piddly stuff I'll go ahead and buy.

      I do get, e.g. wanting to tether on your 5GB plan. Or wanting to theme your iPod (though I personally don't care to.) Or wanting true multitasking. Or wanting to use the iOS device on a less crappy network.

      I just wish the iPhone would come to Verizon. Their network is orders of magnitude better than AT&T's. I'd even deal with a stock OS (no jailbreak).

    31. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Nothing dumb about running a 2-thread application on a 4-thread processor, just some lost capacity.

      But thanks for the confirmation of my second point.

    32. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      1. I wasn't aware Jailbreaking was a particular technical term. I don't believe it is, in fact, that specific.

      Not the original poster.

      "Jail" is a particular term. "Breaking out of the jail" has been used for a while to mean exactly what the GP said. I'm not sure whether or not "jailbreak" was used that way commonly before the iPhone. For what it's worth, I hadn't heard the term prior to the iPhone, though I'd certainly heard and used the term "jail" (it's a common *nix term--chroot jails and FreeBSD jails predate the iPhone.)

      2. The primary goal is not a practical issue. Loading unapproved native code is the practical upshot of the PS3 jailbreak.

      I think most people (not most technical people) would disagree. The primary goal of jailbreaking an iPhone is probably not piracy. The primary goal of modding consoles tends to be piracy. In court, for example, this is likely going to matter in certain cases.

      3. PS3 Jailbreaks are now free as well, thanks to PSGroove (you need a programmable USB stick) and PSFreedom for the N900 and various other devices. What's more the free versions are not shipping with the backup manager as this is non-free. Getting it, using it and how itis used is an exercise left to the user and their own moral code. On top of that not only have there been stories of widespread app piracy on jailbroken iPhones, but that the PS3 hack is in its very early stages so you can't expect a thriving software environment yet.

      Indeed, the PS3 jailbreak is free now. It wasn't at first. I really don't think that's relevant though, except inasmuch as noting that lots of people were coughing up the cost of two games in order to play unlimited backups (or, possibly, to do homebrew which doesn't even exist yet.)

      The promise of homebrew may have been enough, though. Until I heard that the PS3 lacked hardware required to emulate the PS2, I was excited about the possibility of restoring PS2 emulation on the PS3 with this hack. I'm still eager to see a good media center created for it, but I doubt very seriously that the possibility of such software will prevent me from updating my firmware.

    33. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I suppose I've heard of chroot jails as a concept. I'm not sure I'm willing to concede that jailbreaking is that specific a term. Also it doesn't have much bearing on the whole "iPhone hack good, ps3 hack bad" aregument that seems to have kicked off.

      "I think most people (not most technical people) would disagree. The primary goal of jailbreaking an iPhone is probably not piracy. The primary goal of modding consoles tends to be piracy."

      That may be so, or at least it may have been so. I'm less convinced as the piracy angle on phones seems to be growing rapidly.

      "In court, for example, this is likely going to matter in certain cases."

      Well, courts and reason/reality haven't been too closely married in recent times. This is an annoyance though.

      Indeed, the PS3 jailbreak is free now. It wasn't at first. I really don't think that's relevant though, except inasmuch as noting that lots of people were coughing up the cost of two games in order to play unlimited backups (or, possibly, to do homebrew which doesn't even exist yet.)

      Well it's possible I am just weird, but I was tempted to do the hack just because it was interesting. And "backups", sign me up for those. Not the pirate kind. Don't see why I shouldn't be able to load my games from my hard drive for quicker loading and less farting about with disks.

      I'm still amazed that a system crack like this, that has the potential for other operating systems and software, should have to be justified or defended on /. though.

      This place has changed, and not for the better.

    34. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That may be so, or at least it may have been so. I'm less convinced as the piracy angle on phones seems to be growing rapidly.

      True. I don't believe the numbers iPhone developers have "posted." They used number of unique devices divided by number of sales--that's horribly flawed, since people can register up to 5 devices to their iTunes ID.

      I don't know how much piracy there really is on iOS, but my guess is that it's much less than is typically reported. Heck, I've owned 3 iOS devices and installed the same software on all of them.

      Well, courts and reason/reality haven't been too closely married in recent times. This is an annoyance though.

      Courts try to be reasonable. Reasonableness is a test that they use. You only hear about the really wacky decisions, though.

      My point was that intent usually matters. Courts are unlikely to rule that "technically, the mod could be used for homebrew." They're more likely to rule that "predominately, the mod was used for piracy, and was thus illegal." I don't think that's necessarily reasonable, but the courts tend to.

      Well it's possible I am just weird, but I was tempted to do the hack just because it was interesting.

      I don't think you're weird. I had the same gut reaction. But "backups" are the only app that I could find for the mod. I don't particularly care to run games from an external HD (yet) and I have no interest in piracy.

      And "backups", sign me up for those. Not the pirate kind. Don't see why I shouldn't be able to load my games from my hard drive for quicker loading and less farting about with disks.

      No doubt. But most of the time, when people say "backups" they mean pirated ISOs. Personally, I just don't want my 4-year old nephew to screw up the console by putting his dirty, sticky hands on a BD before it goes into the PS3.

      I'm still amazed that a system crack like this, that has the potential for other operating systems and software, should have to be justified or defended on /. though.

      This place has changed, and not for the better.

      Hey, as sites get more mainstream, they get watered down. It sucks, but I think it's a fundamental law of the Internet. Plus, I do think that the primary use of the hack is piracy. I just think that in a perfect world, that shouldn't matter.

      In reality, though, it does.

    35. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by delinear · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was going to say - XBMC was an amazing use of technology that only came about as a direct result of people hacking the hardware to allow homebrew. So much so that it has grown beyond its original platform and is now a mature media player for other systems, and even today I have my old XBOX in the bedroom because it's just so damn convenient being able to stream stuff from my media centre, over the network to play on it using XBMC. That and the emulators available meaning I could replay my old games without having to have a bunch of systems in the living room were the reasons I continued using the XBOX even after I'd upgraded to a 360 for gaming.

    36. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > While there may be some for the PS3, it's definitely not a multi-purpose device.

      Chicken, meet egg.

    37. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention you're probably running an operating system and other things.

    38. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      No, I just happen to know a couple wealthy people that still chose to mod their game systems to play pirated games. They'll buy a new sports car every every 6 months, but can't be bothered to buy their video games.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    39. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen a lot of useful stuff in the Cydia store. There are a handful of moderately useful things, hundreds of themes, and a lot of stuff which, by all appearences, is pretty useless and would probably be approved by Apple if the developer bothered to submit it.

      AD2P support for original iPhone?

      Google Voice app?

    40. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most useful stuff in the Cydia store are GNUutils, Mobile Terminal, and ports of various of other standard Linux/BSD utilities (and I'm *not* a programmer...I'm very much a kool-aid drinking Apple fanboy). I spend as much time using those (and the services they allow) as any apps I've bought from iTunes (example: iPhone VLC port vs YouTube app...guess who wins?)

      The PS3 is the same way. Allowing those basic utilities (i.e. a linux distro...which they took away...dicks) allows all kinds of useful software to be installed. XMBC or MythBuntu-PS3 (with access to the graphics card and all the memory) would pretty much negate the need for any other home theater equipment. I've got a fat PS3, so in one box I'd have: DVD Player, Blu-Ray Player, PS3, PS2, browsing machine, DVR (with a USB plug-in tuner and some re-compiled drivers for it), jukebox (that optical audio out is so nice, also it even plays the fancy CDs, like with surround sound, etc), foot-warmer (seriously...), and more. How is that not a multipurpose device?

    41. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The term "jailbreak" is retarded.
      For a mobile phone, there are 4 levels:

      1: Out of the box, locked-down piece of shit.

      2: Application-unlocked. This means you can run unapproved applications. Be it by disabling/fooling some code signing check, or by flipping a bit in the security model (because the OS allows it normally and the carrier locked it afterward - see every Windows Mobile phone prior to 7).

      3: Carrier-unlocked. This means you can take your shitPhone to somewhere other than AT&T.

      4: Rooted. This means you have complete control of the device software.

      The PS3 is at #2 right now. #3 does not apply. And we have ZERO progress toward getting to #4.

    42. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by numbski · · Score: 1

      Yup. Owned a total of 4 iPhones between my wife and myself. None have ever had a contract with AT&T, paid cash for all 4 (yeah, I know, rules and such - you just have to be creative). I pay $100/mo for both phones, plenty of minutes, unlimited data, text, and SMS. $100 total.

      Going to AT&T isn't an option. Ever. Monthly fee alone is enough to ensure that. I can live with 2G data thank-you-very-much.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    43. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Detecting sarcasm?

      I guess there isn't an app for that...

    44. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by mischi_amnesiac · · Score: 1

      For one thing, cydia has a programm that allows me to reconfigure the volume buttons on my ipod touch to something else, like next song and previous song. There is no such program in the official app store, the last time I checked.

      --
      "Die endgueltige Teilung Deutschlands - das ist unser Auftrag." - Chlodwig Poth
    45. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by xavierpayne · · Score: 1

      An intel i7-975 with an NVidia gtx 480 can emulate a PS2 quite smoothly at 1080p with hardware scaling, AA, and a handful of other graphical touches that blow the original PS3's PS2 support out of the water. SONY already proved the PS3 has the power to emulate the PS2's central processing. All that's left is for them to emulate the Emotion Engine (GPU). I'd be willing to bet there are plenty of cores left over to do that effectively. They even already filed a patent for it: http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation-3/patent-shows-ps3-to-ps2-backwards-compatibility-no-ps2-chips-1/ My guess is once they finally end of life the PS2 the backward compatibility will return to the PS3 via full software emulation. That way they can continue to sell all the PS2 "classics" on the PlayStation Store. FF7 for the PS One has been one of the best selling games in their store for a long time. It's got to be killing them all the money they are loosing not being able to sell downloadable iso's of PS2 games.

    46. Re:It does make homebrew *possible*. by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      An intel i7-975 with an NVidia gtx 480

      That's, like, 5 PS3s.

  7. That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unshockingly enough, Sony crushed a commercial seller of a PS3 mod device like a bug. Even if the law weren't probably unfavorable to the sellers, Sony probably could have just tied them up in injunctions forever anyway. Shocking.

    Equally unsurprisingly, halting the distribution of some OSS software is going about as well as the fight against DVD Jon's little toy did. It's totally unwinnable, and Sony hasn't shown many clear signs of even trying. Shocking.

    However, it isn't clear how much this matters. This isn't CSS, where the system was set in stone, millions of un-patchable, non-internet-connected hardware units were already in the wild, and team DRM pretty much just had to suck it up. Those were the good old days.

    Sony controls the Playstation Network, and can enforce minimum software versions for access, or punitively lock out units. Even for offline users, individual game disks can mandate, and include, upgrades to a higher version. Sony has, certainly, lost the game against anyone content to just pick up an old PS3 fat on ebay and enjoy a pirated copy of every PS3 game to date, all for ~$200. You'll have to stay offline, and avoid games with mandatory upgrades; but not a bad deal on the whole, I can certainly see a fair few takers.

    However, unless this USB hack is seriously powerful, exploiting some basically unblockable fundamental flaw in the PS3's design, all PS3s that ship more than a few weeks from now, are updated(manually or automatically) to the next firmware revision, or wish to play newer games or use newer peripherals, or play online, are back in Sony's camp. And, unlike a DVD or Blu-ray disk, where the plaintext copy, once created, is eminently playable on all sorts of 3rd party devices, general purpose computers, and whatnot, PS3 games are pretty much only playable on PS3s, pending substantial advances in computing power that will allow emulation. This isn't "hack once, run anywhere." Each individual PS3 is controlled separately, and the success of the hacking device depends on how many hackable PS3s remain in the wild, a variable over which Sony has substantial control...

    1. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by Inda · · Score: 1

      New games with mandatory updates will be patched. It used to happen on the PS1. Patching ISOs became the norm in the end and we gained PPF-o-matic as a result.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      However, it isn't clear how much this matters. This isn't CSS, where the system was set in stone, millions of un-patchable, non-internet-connected hardware units were already in the wild, and team DRM pretty much just had to suck it up. Those were the good old days.

      Sony controls the Playstation Network, and can enforce minimum software versions for access, or punitively lock out units. Even for offline users, individual game disks can mandate, and include, upgrades to a higher version. Sony has, certainly, lost the game against anyone content to just pick up an old PS3 fat on ebay and enjoy a pirated copy of every PS3 game to date, all for ~$200. You'll have to stay offline, and avoid games with mandatory upgrades; but not a bad deal on the whole, I can certainly see a fair few takers.
       

      Agreed. Unless we can get a free and open parallel Playstation Network for hacked consoles to make use of, it'll continue to be a arms race and Sony will ultimately have the upper hand due to owning and controlling the network. And it's a much taller order, both legally and technically, to provide such a network. And likely prohibitively expensive even if there weren't legal obstacles.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      The 'USB Hack' apparently uses a flaw in the USB driver, so it should be easy for Sony to patch.

      But in the mean time, even though Sony 'crushed' the company, there's now an open source version that runs on most Android phones, Nokia n900, and even a TomTom, among others.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by whoop · · Score: 1

      I'd say this software crushed OZModChip's sales of the device more than Sony. It went from $150 AUS down to a free alternative in a week.

    5. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      But what if a game requires PSN to update? You'd also be locked out of all the dlc. Blu-rays can be tied to firmware as well.

      With used games being so cheap these days only a total lame ass would bother pirating.

    6. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Who is we? I'd like to see as many disincentives as possible with console piracy. I don't want it to end up like the pc scene where half the games are MMOs due to the high piracy rate. I also don't understand what kind of lame ass pirates when used games are so cheap. This to me seems like something a lame ass does to impress his non-technical friends. Oh looky I have pirated games! I'm a computer genius! I read a how-to and burned a disc! Worship me!

    7. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by Andorin · · Score: 1

      > I'd like to see as many disincentives as possible with console piracy.
      Even at the expense of important rights like making backups, right of first sale, and right of fair use?

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    8. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Yes, because without that all important first step of someone actually making the game, none of the rest of the list has any meaning at all.

    9. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by Andorin · · Score: 1

      So a company's intellectual property rights trump a consumer's rights to exceptions to those intellectual property rights? In what twisted world does that make any sense?

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    10. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      I think he'd rather have the choice to buy a game with no backup or first sale rights than have no games to buy at all.

      And I'd tend to agree. These escalating cat and mouse piracy games are how we ended up with DRM like Ubisoft is running now. It's just going to make gaming suck more and more until either the developers give up the fight (unlikely) or a DRM that's draconian enough to be unbreakable (or at least hard enough to break that it's very uncommon) becomes the norm, and one more battlefield in this war has just been chosen.

    11. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think the most profitable game and genre of games in history (MMO's) are only made due to piracy? That no-one else would bother making a new MMO without piiracy.. hell who wants the most profitable product on earth anyhow? Fuck that.

    12. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd say this software crushed OZModChip's sales of the device more than Sony. It went from $150 AUS down to a free alternative in a week.

      the questions then being how much it cost to develop the hack and how many units they sold at how much profit. if the venture was profitable it's a win. seems like the project requires two guys at the most, one to actually do the hack and one to handle the site. that could easily be one guy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      Never had a need to backup a game and I don't consider it a right. Blu-rays have a special protective layer and are pretty hard to screw up with scratches. If you somehow break one by stepping on it or lose it in a fire I don't see why you think you should have a right to a replacement.

      The argument for backups is used as a justification for piracy. I've never met a single pc gamer that kept backups of purchased games. However I have met plenty of pc gamers that had an archive of pirated games.

      I do like being able to buy and sell games but piracy only encourages game companies to go all digital. Or in other words your self-declared right to backups invariably undermines your other self-declared right to first sale.

    14. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      Developers will never return to releasing naked games as some here seem to want.

      MMOs cannot be pirated due to the game being dependent on the server. Yes I know there is WoW piracy but that is because they left the engine in the client. There are endless methods to prevent piracy in a client/server relationship. Good luck pirating a game whose engine exists 95% on the other end. Even if the server code was leaked you'd still have to pay to host it and devs could continually release updates to the main codebase.

      The pc gaming world is already screwed up thanks to piracy. Fallout Vegas PC will require Steam and won't allow resale.

    15. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      Right. The point is that currently PS3 games are released more or less naked as all of the DRM necessary is contained in the console, allowing more relaxed PS3 DRM (a disc check is all that's necessary).

      The concern is that Sony will start to include actual draconian DRM if the disc check method is cracked, which is what this discussion is about. It's going to suck if all PS3 games start binding to your account and become unplayable without an authentication online, which is absolutely a possibility if the disc check method of copy protection is circumvented widely enough. Hell, we're already there for PC gaming for this exact reason.

    16. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by Andorin · · Score: 1

      > Never had a need to backup a game and I don't consider it a right. Blu-rays have a special protective layer and are pretty hard to screw up with scratches. If you somehow break one by stepping on it or lose it in a fire I don't see why you think you should have a right to a replacement.
      > The argument for backups is used as a justification for piracy.
      Wow, really? Now I can't tell if you honestly believe what you post or if you're just trolling. No right to backups, huh? Only pirates want to back up their games, huh? I guess you don't think we ought to be able to rip our DVDs for backup purposes either. Or our CDs. Is it copyright infringement to copy a purchased track to an external hard drive for backup purposes? Do the parents of a messy kid have to buy another copy of The Lion King each time he all but destroys the disc? Should somebody with a library of thousands of CDs/DVDs/games be forced to physically hunt through their collection for a certain disc when they want to hear/watch/play something, instead of relying on the convenience of local digital storage?

      If you answered "yes" to any of the above questions, you have the same mindset as the entertainment industries and are therefore a good representation of what's wrong with copyright today.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    17. Re:That seems a bit hyperbolic, no? by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      A console that allows backups will be pirated just as much as the pc currently is.

      Most console owners don't care about backups and would rather have a locked down console that prevents piracy and creates a healthier market for developers.

      But I still don't see why you think you have a right to a backup of a $10 kid movie anymore than a backup to an action figure. In both cases you have bought a product that you are responsible for taking care of. And as I already pointed out the protective layer on Blu-rays has eliminated the scratching issue.

      It is well established that people cannot be trusted with an honor system when it comes to media. Too many people have no shame in taking the work of others without payment, especially in an anonymous system where it is assumed that someone else will foot the bill. We have a platform that allows easy backups and that is the pc, the platform where even $10 indy games are pirated at rates of over 70%. So yes I do not recognized your self-declared right to backups since it is just used for piracy and I would rather support a locked down system that has zero piracy and requires the owners to take care of their games, which is rather easy with Blu-rays.

  8. Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive... by sethstorm · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So it enables piracy. But if it adds more functionality because of it, that much the better.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  9. Speaking as somone... by Banichi · · Score: 1

    ...who hasn't updated since April 1st and doesn't use the PSN service, what does Sony banning users mean to me? Absolutely nothing. I owe these people nothing. I owe Sony nothing. If Sony has a problem with me using this knowledge to my own personal benefit, tough luck jack. I lost any inclination I had to buy from them EVER again on April 1st. I had been a fairly loyal customer up to that point (Sony TV, DVD player, etc...).

    1. Re:Speaking as somone... by magamiako1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And unfortunately for humanity, 500,000,000 other users won't care.

    2. Re:Speaking as somone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more people who care than you might think. And we're able to spread FUD and/or otherwise create negative publicity...

      Do you think game developers love Sony? Even on Sony's own forum for registered devs there was an uproar against the OtherOS removal.

      We do not like them. Their console is an underdog that was late to the market, their Lv-2 OS ate twice more memory than XBox firmware (and XBox has more RAM available for the CPU), their outdated-on-arrival GPU is crap - slow, buggy and incapable to support render targets with decent precision...

      Cell is a stillborn CPU-GPU hybrid which neither fits traditional programming techniques nor newer GPGPU ones (Cell's OpenCL implementation sux, SPU's OpenCL profile is "Accelerator" because it can't handle images...). IBM discontinued it - good riddance.

      The whole platform is a chain of bad decisions hacked together. Sony are only relevant because of their PS2 ancestry and industry inertia. But supporting their platform is a major hindrance for game developers.

      That's why we don't care about video games quality on PS3. It's doomed to have sub-HD, 30 fps max, downscaled-texture games with low quality post-processing effects. And no dildo will save them.

    3. Re:Speaking as somone... by Nursie · · Score: 1

      From wikipedia -

      "In November 2009, an IBM representative said that it has discontinued the development of a Cell processor with 32 SPUs[19][20] but they have not halted development of other future products in the Cell family"

      Sounds really dead, sure. And the 'underdog' is rapidly reaching the same level of sales as the 360.

      I have no experience programming for Cell, but it always sounded interesting to me as a parallelism experiment. Maybe it should have ben restricted to the scientific and engineering establishment for the first few iterations.

    4. Re:Speaking as somone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no experience programming for Cell, but it always sounded interesting to me as a parallelism experiment.

      So long as your definition of an interesting parallelism experiment is: here's the source for gcc - it doesn't actually work properly on the Cell yet.....

  10. Just reward by syrce · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Serves Sony right for bullying us into giving up Linux on our PS3! I'm sure this would have eventually have happened but it makes me smile that it happened so soon after they specifically took away the Other OS option to avoid their console getting hacked. Talk about bad karma.

    1. Re:Just reward by meerling · · Score: 1

      They didn't bully anyone int giving up Linux, they just flat out took it away. YOINK!
      If you were bullied into giving it up, that presumes you'd had a choice, even if it means you would get beaten up if you didn't comply.

    2. Re:Just reward by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      We did have a choice (do not update), and we did get beat up if we chose it (no PSN, no newer games).

    3. Re:Just reward by syrce · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    4. Re:Just reward by cpct0 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I had to update eventually to get the latest PSN stuff... it took me 2 months before updating, in that time, I purchased a 360 and I bought most games I missed on the 360. Lost revenue. Now I got the choice and they just lost the equivalent of 50% of their revenues from me.

      I am a game programmer, I code as a living, in fact I own part of a successful gaming company. I wanted to stay up front to PS3 development and have fun with it, to see what I could do with it (even with their stupid ganked environment). Now I can't ...

      Then, the key, they kill its import rights ... now everyone and their moms can unlock them, with game loaders and stuff... Won't take long before emulation will be perfect and undetectable. Sorry for not losing sleep over that. Sympathy level = 0%.

      I don't condone piracy, I never did and never will, I gain most of my pay because gamers purchase my games. But when companies are doing jackasses of themselves and are evil to their purchasers, I have no sympathy. Same that I don't have sympathy for RIAA/MPAA.

    5. Re:Just reward by NoZart · · Score: 1

      PSN stays accessible through a Custom Proxy without the updates.

  11. Re:Banned from PSN... by morari · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry. Sony already ruined their own expensive console by removing marketed features after the fact.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  12. Re:Banned from PSN... by Andorin · · Score: 1

    > First of all, this is just used for pirating purposes. In fact that's the only thing the hack allows, so drop the homebrew bullshit.

    My [CD/DVD ripper, portable music player, old console emulation software, BitTorrent client, external hard drive] is just used for pirating purposes. In fact that's the only thing the device allows.

    Clearly we should ban all those things because they enable piracy.

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  13. Shame it had to come to this... by cesman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It has been years since I owned a console (Turbografx 16), after reading about the power of the Cell, I wanted to get a PS3. Not just for games but for Linux! However it turned out one couldn't full harness the power of the PS3 with Linux. So, I didn't get one. Thru the years, I'd check and see if any breakthrus were made or if Sony changed their stance. Well, with the release of the Slim models, the stance changed all right.

    Since I own a N900 (Great hardware, great OS, great community! Nokia however is frustrating.) and seeing the release of PSFreedom was interesting to say the least. However at the moment all one can do is backup one's games. While it will be interesting to watch what happens in the homebrew scene, where does that leave those like myself that would want to do something legitimate with the PS3?

    In my case, for years I've wanted to port KnoppMyth (now LinHES) to the PS3. Now, it seems that things maybe falling in place that would allow that. However thanks to corporate decisions and the law (DMCA), I probably won't be able to do so. Talk about crippling innovation.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    1. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sony makes consoles for gamers, not geeks who want cheap processing power. They need you to buy games for that piece of hardware to make some profit, that's why they try to crush any other use for it.

      The rest of the PS3 owners bought it to play games, so when some obscure option that less than one percent users even tried, it's no surprise no one cares.

      One user said that the hack can be used for something else other than pirating? Well what is it?
      Another said that you can buy an old version and play pirated games with it, all under 200 USD. The best games are online multiplayer. If you want to pirate games, then the Xbox is cheaper and easier to use.

    2. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by adolf · · Score: 1

      The rest of the PS3 owners bought it to play games, so when some obscure option that less than one percent users even tried, it's no surprise no one cares.

      "The rest of the PS3 owners"?

      I bought a PS3 specifically to play Gran Turismo 5. Years went by, during which time I discovered that the PS3 is a very fine player for all manner of media. It was such a nice media player, in fact, that my brother-in-law would frequently comment about it after he'd finished up a game of Forza on his new 360 (the old one having succumbed to the Red Ring of Death). I didn't mind his chiding, though -- I always knew that GT 5 would be out soon enough, and that it would be just awesome. And, in the meantime, the PS3 did make a very fine media player, indeed well worth the purchase price just for that group of functions. I was never disappointed by it.

      So fine, in fact, is the PS3's ability to regurgitate media into an HDMI cable that we used it all the time. It played Netflix streams with splendid quality, and Blu-Ray movies like none other, and DVD rips over the network -- all without a single complaint.

      Until, that is, when the laser diode for the Blu-Ray drive recently died from use and lo, no amount of disassembly and careful cleaning would cure it.

      In what is one of the greater ironies that I have ever experienced with a bit of electronics, this failure came within 2 months of the expected actual fucking release date of Gran Turismo 5. And since all PS3 games are published on Blu-Ray, it won't be able play it.

    3. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by cesman · · Score: 1

      Keep thinking. If you knew anything about my project (or video processing in general), you'd know I'd need the power of the RSX. As I stated, since I could not use the PS3 for all of what I needed it to do, I never purchased it. That is that coward.

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    4. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by cesman · · Score: 1

      If could have fully utilized the PS3 for my needs, I'd have purchased it and games. Since it cannot, I didn't. I can think of several games that I'd like to play (and afford to buy). But why should I give Sony my hard earned money for a device that doesn't "do everything"?

      I'm not interested in piracy.

      Our opinions on multiplayer online differ. I've no interest in the Xbox.

      The Xbox (XBMC) is a good example of what is possible if console makers would be more open and allow homebrews. XBMC is touted as an excellent media center. It lives on, on multiple platforms even after the death of the original Xbox.

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    5. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      I think you just want an iPad.

      I kid, I kid.

    6. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by X.25 · · Score: 1

      Sony makes consoles for gamers, not geeks who want cheap processing power. They need you to buy games for that piece of hardware to make some profit, that's why they try to crush any other use for it.

      The rest of the PS3 owners bought it to play games, so when some obscure option that less than one percent users even tried, it's no surprise no one cares.

      One user said that the hack can be used for something else other than pirating? Well what is it?
      Another said that you can buy an old version and play pirated games with it, all under 200 USD. The best games are online multiplayer. If you want to pirate games, then the Xbox is cheaper and easier to use.

      I don't get it. When did they manage to turn so many people into fucking droids, that just keep repeating same youre-all-pirates memes, and don't seem to have any brains left?

    7. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by cesman · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting to see what an Andriod or Meego pad has to offer. I have a few hundred dollars burning a hole in my pocket... Could have been Sony's but oh well.

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    8. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Consider a used Windows XP tablet. They do a lot of stuff for the money.

    9. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      It has been years since I owned a console (Turbografx 16), after reading about the power of the Cell, I wanted to get a PS3. Not just for games but for Linux! However it turned out one couldn't full harness the power of the PS3 with Linux. So, I didn't get one. Thru the years, I'd check and see if any breakthrus were made or if Sony changed their stance. Well, with the release of the Slim models, the stance changed all right.

      Not strictly true. The major thing restricted by the hypervisor in Other OS was the GPU which was largely 2D, however the Cell processor was largely free and available. People were bitching about how the GPU while all the time there were 6 free SPUs just SITTING THERE DOING NOTHING. Think of how much use Mesa or x264 or any other computationally expensive operation could have made of those SPUs. It would have been nice if the GPU were opened up further and some progress had been made to that end, but the reason Other OS got canned was through the actions of hackers trying to root the machine. Sony's actions may have been heavy handed but it's entirely understandable why they did what they did.

    10. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This is not a big deal to fix, ebay has the parts you need. Local game stores(Not EB or Gamestop) will be able to do this repair for ~$80.

    11. Re:Shame it had to come to this... by adolf · · Score: 1

      No, not a big deal, as long as you have $60-80 to spend on it every few years since...as far as I can tell...the "new" assemblies use the same failure-prone design as the old one. And the parts market for this stuff seems so...grey. A lot of these things look like Chinese rebuilds, except for a few completely flakey-looking sellers who seem to have the same thing but whom state "No, ours is newly-manufactured. Really! Trust us! We really mean it! You get what you pay for!!@!"

      With all that grey, I don't trust any of 'em. I read it all like this: "Here's a widget. It might be new, used, or rebuilt. We may have even actually tested it, or not. And we may be lying to you about all of those things. Plus, we don't think it'll really work long-term, so there's no proper warranty for you, sucker."

      I'm not afraid of buying cheap Chinese goods; in fact, I often buy random things from dealexteme. But at least with Dealextreme, I know what I'm getting into and only risk a few dollars. The PS3 parts suppliers? Feh.

      Maybe if Sony had proper channels for distributing console parts to the public, the market would appear to be very different. AFAICT, they aren't doing this at all.

      Meanwhile, there is a very different dual-lens design used on slightly newer models that is apparently a lot better, but no way to upgrade to it without upgrading the whole console.

      Which, frankly, seems like the best bet anyway. I see no particular harm in having one PS3 for streaming, audio, homebrew, and DVD media, plus another to wear out doing disc-based games, PSN, and Blu-Ray...except it's expensive. But to be honest, if this were a perfect world, I'd be able to just plug a random external USB Blu-Ray reader into it and call it done.

      (And all of this is assuming that the diode, not the controller, is fucked. If the controller is fucked, then the fix is some SMD soldering fuckery that I'd rather neither perform nor pay for.)

  14. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracy and multilayer do not mix. Anyone careless enough to use hacked consoles on the PSN deserves the ban. And it's only been a few months after a bunch of modded console owners got shafted. You'd think people will learn by now.

  15. props to sony by bakamorgan · · Score: 1

    It was just a matter of time till it got hacked. Props to sony for making it this long. I don't mod my systems untill I have the next gen one in my hands and working since then it extends the life or use of the old console. By that time then the hackinng is more perfected and I have a much better chance of bricking my machine...but meh each to their own.

    1. Re:props to sony by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      By that time then the hackinng is more perfected and I have a much better chance of bricking my machine.

      Don't you mean not bricking your machine?

    2. Re:props to sony by bakamorgan · · Score: 1

      oops yea. lol

  16. Re:Banned from PSN... by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those who have used them have already been banned from PSN and multiplayer games. What a great way to ruin your expensive console.

    Not everybody's idea of an enjoyable gaming experience involves trading insults with hormonal 15 year-olds, nor does $300 meet everyone's definition of "expensive." Jailbreaking is appropriate for anyone who either doesn't care about online features, can afford two consoles, or both. I suspect that's a not-insignificant portion of current and potential owners.

  17. Can Sony really detect it? by cesman · · Score: 1

    I think, at this point it is supposition that Sony can detect the use of a backup. If they can, how does that make you feel if you legitimately own a game and back it up? More importantly, what else do they know about you and what are they doing with that information? I'm not talking about piracy, I'm talking about your rights as a consumer and your rights online.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    1. Re:Can Sony really detect it? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about your rights as a consumer and your rights online.

      In the free market USA, the rights have the consumers!

      P.S. Cue the DMCA: especially the on-line consumers.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    2. Re:Can Sony really detect it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The application ID is fixed with PSJB. The backup manager/launcher needs to store the app id for the game in question and change itself to that, if possible. There have been no bans based on this JB, they were fakes dug up from 2008.

  18. Re:Banned from PSN... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    In fact that's the only thing the hack allows, so drop the homebrew bullshit.

    So, what, somehow this hack allows one to run pirated content, but it *doesn't* allow one to run homebrew? I suppose you have evidence for this idiotic claim?

  19. when will they learn.. by Lanteran · · Score: 1

    When will the figure out that once you SELL something to somebody, you no longer own it. I'm sick of companies telling me what I can and cannot do with my hardware after I buy it. I should be able to access the PSN with a modded playstation the same way I'm able to get service on a rooted phone. The first people to make an open game console (with comparable/superior hardware of course) are going to be rich.

    --
    "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    1. Re:when will they learn.. by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Lanteran, meet PC.

    2. Re:when will they learn.. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      I get the whole you-own-the-hardware thing, but why should you have the right to force Sony to let you use their network on your terms? I don't see where that came in at all. It seems to have sprung fully formed from your engorged sense of entitlement.

    3. Re:when will they learn.. by Khyber · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "but why should you have the right to force Sony to let you use their network on your terms?"

      because I paid for the hardware that enables me access to their network. They've already ripped capability from me, it's only fair play to turn the whole situation about on their asses and demand now to let our modded consoles access their network freely.

      Tit for tat.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:when will they learn.. by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It goes beyond that.

      I bought a console to play PS3 games.

      Sony will release (or rather, already has released) a firmware which disables certain things on my PS3.

      I have the choice to not update. If I don't, I don't get PSN. That's fine.

      In 2 months, there will be games which won't function unless they're booted on the newest firmware. That's not fine. Now I have a PS3 which won't play every PS3 game unless I update the firmware and lose features. Sony is holding functionality which I purchased hostage. That's no bueno.

    5. Re:when will they learn.. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      What REALLY sucks is that a lot of people don't have their PS3's networked or don't even have an internet connection. So unless the firmware update comes on the disc itself, those people will be screwed by the new games. And they haven't done anything wrong (though this may lead them to piracy, ironically, just to play the newer games).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:when will they learn.. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Has this ever happened? I don't have any experience on this for the PS3, but on the Wii, every game I've seen which required at least a particular firmware included it on the disc.

  20. Sony won the war by robmv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sony won because they managed to delay for nearly 4 years the break in the PS3 security, They are not losing money on the console right now, If this would happened early Sony could have lost a lot of money, losing possible game sales on people that probably never had the intention of buying a PS3 because it was not pirate ready is not significant in my opinion, pirates never intended to pay

    1. Re:Sony won the war by Shados · · Score: 1

      Yup, even with the Xbox 360's RROD issues, I'm pretty confident that this had a BIG thing to do with the PS3's popularity among third party devs. Develop for the 360 when it had twice the user base, but get pirated 3/4rd of the time, or develop for the much smaller PS3 user base, but have 5 times the attach rate.

      No brainer, so even when the PS3 looked like it would end up on life support, it was able to "recover" from that alone...

    2. Re:Sony won the war by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know, I have a stack of Wii games, and I don't own a single PS3 game. In fact, as I look through my library of literally over a thousand original console games, a good 90% of the games were purchased for systems that had been hacked. Maybe I am really that unique of a human being... Somehow I doubt it though.

    3. Re:Sony won the war by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Part of that is that the most recent revisions are shy a few chips which the older ones had. And they didn't bother to advertise that the newer versions are essentially gimped so that they don't lose as much money on them. The Slim for instance had no other OS feature and had the chips for emulating both the PS and PS2 not included so that Sony could save a few dollars on production. And from what I gather, they'd removed the PS emulation from previous revisions as well.

    4. Re:Sony won the war by Narishma · · Score: 1

      That's mostly incorrect. The PS1 emulation has never been removed and has always been 100% software. The PS2 emulation on the other hand requires hardware assistance because the PS3 isn't powerful enough to do it completely in software. Those chips were removed in 2008, a year before the Slim model was released. Also, the old models that are capable of doing PS2 emulation can still do it, the option was never removed.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    5. Re:Sony won the war by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      The attach rate on the 360 is still higher than the PS3 (and seems to be climbing), although the PS3 is making strides compared to early in its life.

      I guess if you make up your facts, you can conclude anything. That's a real no-brainer right there.

    6. Re:Sony won the war by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Didn't Sony go on record claiming they wanted the PS3 to last a decade? If so, I'd say they still lost unless they can permanently patch this.

    7. Re:Sony won the war by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Sony never got hacked before because no one gave a crap. Now that the PS3 has gotten some decent exclusives, suddenly the hacker community started actually trying. Any console can be hacked. It's really just a question of how motivated the community is to put in the effort.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Sony won the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a stack of Wii games, and I don't own a single PS3 game.

      I have bad taste too, but I don't go around bragging about it.

  21. Re:Banned from PSN... by diamondsw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, this is just used for pirating purposes. In fact that's the only thing the hack allows, so drop the homebrew bullshit.

    Pardon? I have no interest in either pirating OR homebrew. I just want to load the games that I bought onto the console to improve load times, avoid disc damage from handling, and keep all my games available at all times. What's the point of a 250GB drive it all I have on it are dinky PSN games?

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
  22. Re:Banned from PSN... by Sam+H · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't know what you are talking about. I successfully wrote and compiled PS3 software, then ran it on my retail console thanks to PSGroove.

    --
    God, root, what is difference ?
  23. Re:Banned from PSN... by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry. Sony already ruined their own expensive console by removing marketed features after the fact.

    Searching Google News returns about 7,700 hits for "PS3."

    The "OtherOS" was never more than a very small part of the PS3 story - and it is the Move controller that is making headlines now.

  24. Re:Banned from PSN... by Nihn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "These hacks are fully detectable by PS3 and Sony." Only if the system is online....which most people already know and thanks to the ability to download the ps3 updates to a usb means you never have to connect your console to the Sony servers. "this is just used for pirating purposes" Welcome to the game of consumer desire and business ethics. You can buy something now and it is not legally your property. You are not allowed any freedoms with something you paid your money for. If this jailbreak allowed people to get a whole console for free then I would have some sympathy.....but as the Xbox community has already shown that the console...is only a computer. And a computer has the potential to do alot....even if it isn't in the original design. Hell, if it wasn't for hackers you wouldn't have the computer you sit in front of. Sony will not listen, the industry will not listen.....hackers ALWAYS listen...and they deliver hand over fist. Be mad all you want, the future of games are in the hands of the intelligent...and they numbers favor the hacking team. "Sony has lost the PS3 hacking war?" Yes...the fact Psgroove exist and works is absolute proof that the ps3 is hackable, and that Sony has gone to great lengths to prevent something that a bunch of "criminals" ,who are no better than pedophiles in some peoples eyes ,were able to accomplish. Now comes the flood of "homebrew" apps that will add value to a system and unlocks the potential for something greater. "What a great way to ruin your expensive console" you mean what a great way to keep revenue out of the pockets of billionaires who don't care for the consumer, only the stock margin and their own personal well being......

  25. Android ports now available by capebretonsux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Without taking a stance on the whole piracy issue, this does work with a HTC Dream on a 120gb ps3 slim. Only problem is that it breaks wifi and sd storage (on the phone) until you reflash.

    1. Re:Android ports now available by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Sweet, I'll have to try that. I wish I could mod you for that, but I've already posted here.

  26. So? by tius · · Score: 1

    Who cares, I've gone OpenCL and a GPU, the Cell/CBE is dead.

  27. Great. by TheCount22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great can I have Linux on my PS3 now?

    Now that Sony has lost maybe they can give me back the features I PAID FOR.

    Thanks.

  28. Linux on ps3? Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm a full time linux user and I also own a ps3 for two years now. However, I never tried to install linux on it because it does it's job well for what I can't do on my linux system - play games. I wouldn't be surprised if most slashdotters that posted so far don't even use linux on their desktop let alone own a ps3. So what's up with the hate?

    1. Re:Linux on ps3? Give me a break by TheCount22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm a full time linux user and I also own a ps3 for two years now. However, I never tried to install linux on it because it does it's job well for what I can't do on my linux system - play games. I wouldn't be surprised if most slashdotters that posted so far don't even use linux on their desktop let alone own a ps3. So what's up with the hate?

      From your point of view they took away a feature you never used. Now imagine Dell forced a new BIOS that would disable Linux from booting on your PC. Because "nobody uses linux". What would you say then?

      I bought the PS3 for 3 things, linux, movies and games.

      I used my PS3 as a thin client mostly. But also as a media center. But now thats no longer possible.

    2. Re:Linux on ps3? Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Buying a PS3 for linux is like buying a pogo stick for your daily 30 mile commute. Sure it's possible, but there are so many better options that I don't no why people would even consider it.

  29. Re:Banned from PSN... by Andorin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > The "OtherOS" was never more than a very small part of the PS3 story - and it is the Move controller that is making headlines now.

    Which has what to do with his point?

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  30. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly. I've been following this mod for exactly one reason: enabling PS2 games on PS3 versions which don't support that. Although having OtherOS to play with would be kind of neat (I have a slim, so I never had either feature.)

    I don't pirate. I occasionally boycott a publisher, and then I simply do without their games (I'm looking at you, Ubisoft.) But I'd love to be able to disconnect my PS2 from my TV.

    There have been some murmurs that this will be possible soon. The only question will be whether the cat-and-mouse game Sony will be playing with pirates will be too annoying.

    Sony, bring back OtherOS and PS2 emulation, and I'll have no interest in this mod!

  31. Re:Banned from PSN... by Nikker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I can pick up a PS3 for $299CDN and use is as a HTPC, screw games. If after it's hacked I can play one out of 1000 games then I'm cool with that. The slim ones look cool enough have ethernet, HDMI and other jacks and most HTPC's will set you back $400+ from scratch (especially if you want a decent looking case). So if they get access to the GPU then I'll get one and the PSN will never get a ping from me.

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  32. Re:Banned from PSN... by feepness · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Which has what to do with his point?

    Something that so few care about hardly "ruins" a console.

  33. Where's the update? by maitai · · Score: 1

    I just want them to release the firmware that enables 3D Blu-Ray damnit (they said the firmware was going to be released in Sep and now they say Oct). Anything else is moot. If they don't get off their ass and release it I'm going to have to go buy a Sony 3D Blu-Ray player...

    1. Re:Where's the update? by Andorin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > If they don't get off their ass and release it I'm going to have to go buy a Sony 3D Blu-Ray player...

      Ah, that isn't exactly incentive for them to update PS3s to support Blu-Ray. It is, in fact, the exact opposite.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    2. Re:Where's the update? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      What? Delayed?

      But I wanted to watch my one and only 3d-bluray movie!

  34. Let's be honest by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's at least be a little bit honest. Maybe the ability to install Linux on a PS3 was a big deal around here, but for the vast majority of people buying one it's not even on their radar. There's a least a sizable number of these people who have either never heard of Linux or have no real understanding of what it actually is.

    I don't expect that Sony will lose many sales over this. Considering that they may still be selling it at a loss and hoping to make up for it in game sales may actually net them more money as there were at least a few people who were using them to make clusters.

    1. Re:Let's be honest by westlake · · Score: 1

      Considering that they may still be selling it at a loss and hoping to make up for it in game sales may actually net them more money as there were at least a few people who were using them to make clusters.

      A single USAF HPC was built from 2,0000 PS3s. Blunderingly, Sony Nukes PS3 Supercomputing Purchases on that scale take product off retail shelves and return nothing to Sony but unbankable good will.

      Sony took a brief swing at commercializing PS3 tech for post-production video. Zego When the OtherOS cannabilizes sales of your own HPC product, it is the OtherOS which disappears.

    2. Re:Let's be honest by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      For the few dollars they lose in game sales to folks buying a PS3 to build a cluster, they get back 10 or 100 times as much in free publicity about how awesome the PS3 is. If the XBOX 360 is so XOBX awesome, where's their cluster? (ASCI Red ring of Death?)

    3. Re:Let's be honest by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      What an amazing world we live in, where a customer can be 'blamed' for buying 2,000 units of your luxury goods product at full retail price.

    4. Re:Let's be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd already stopped selling consoles with the Other OS feature (it was only available on the fat models, not the updated slim verion), why remove a feature from a model you no longer sell? Doing so just marks them out as unstrustworthy assholes regardless of how few actually used the feature.

  35. Re:Banned from PSN... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    The hack, not so much, but if your'e playing "Backup manager" Sony knows what's up :)

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  36. Yo dawg! by xaosflux · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It makes you smile that you can use one homebrew console to hack another to get homebrew on that console."

    Yo dawg! I heard you like hacking homebrew, so we we put hack in your homebrew so you can hack homebrew while you hack!

    1. Re:Yo dawg! by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      That particular joke is getting more boring by the square of it's number of apparitions.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  37. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be a troll. Homebrew is a real fair use case and is what move the reversing scene. None of this would happen with OtherOS still there.

  38. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by spire3661 · · Score: 2, Informative

    IF your machine doesnt have PS2 compatibility already, no amount of software is going to bring it back. PS2 emulation on PS3 has ALWAYS depended on at least part of the PS2 hardware being physically present.

    --
    Good-bye
  39. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Sancho · · Score: 1

    Well that's damned disappointing.

  40. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by hedwards · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You mean it adds back functionality that they used to include with the PS3. Don't forget that they have removed functionality from recent firmware editions as a response to the threat to their exclusivity. And the latest report is that the next firmware update is going to disable the USB ports. Sony has learned very little from getting clobbered over that rootkit they installed on computers as DRM.

  41. good news for PC gamers by 0111+1110 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that there is no unhacked console left, maybe the consolization of PC games will slow down a bit. And maybe Sony will finally release the PS4, so that PC graphics can finally move ahead. It has been 3 years since Crysis. PC games have been stalled in terms of graphics because the better the graphics are on the PC version the more difficult it is to port to the old tech on the consoles.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:good news for PC gamers by NoZart · · Score: 1

      Not gonna happen.

  42. Re:Banned from PSN... by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 1

    Which has what to do with his point?

    Something that so few care about hardly "ruins" a console.

    So few care about? Your on slashdot, so most people here care about it. Remember your audience, if my watch doesn't run linux it's not cool enough for slashdot.

  43. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PS3 is not fast enough to emulate a PS2 without hardware assistance. Sorry.

  44. Re:LOL! Idiots Out In Force by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    I think you entirely miss the point.

    If the GP is using OpenCL, they're not using it for gaming, they're using it for scientific computing (or some similar FP-heavy, parallelizable workload.)

    Cell is now fairly old technology, so a GPU catching up with and surpassing Cell doesn't surprise me one bit.

  45. Re:Banned from PSN... by morari · · Score: 1

    The Move? Seriously? It's a gimped knock-off of the Wii. haven't those PS3 fanboys spent the last few years yelling about what a useless gimmick motion control is?

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  46. Re:Banned from PSN... by westlake · · Score: 1

    What's the point of a 250GB drive it all I have on it are dinky PSN games?

    How many games using Blu-Ray media can you load on a 250 GB drive?

    The simplest and most effective form of DRM is the file you can't afford to store or copy or download.

  47. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10-50gb per game, you do the rest of the math. HD loaders on the Wii have been a godsend to me, with a 2 year old (a couple years ago). It didn't take her long to find that the eject button gave her a nice toy to throw around the house.

  48. Re:Banned from PSN... by mjwx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These hacks are fully detectable by PS3 and Sony. Those who have used them have already been banned from PSN and multiplayer games. What a great way to ruin your expensive console.

    Nice way to turn this around.

    The hackers didn't make Sony ban them from PSN, Sony pulled the trigger themselves. Regardless of weather they are legally within their rights to do so, it still was Sony's choice.

    What a great way to ruin your expensive console.

    But console gamers keep telling me consoles are cheap (despite console games costing A$20 more then PC games.)

    First of all, this is just used for pirating purposes

    Further more, it's not. I used to have a modded Xbox 1, I used it to run XBMC and used it as a cheap media centre. I didn't play games on it, not even pirated ones. A lot of people are looking for cheap hardware to run a simple function on (like playing video's from a hard drive). Unfortunately nothing like my old Xbox 1 exists anymore thanks to overzealous content controls so I ended up building a media centre PC out of parts of old PC's.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  49. Re:Banned from PSN... by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

    "you're."

  50. Re:Banned from PSN... by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure, it's basically copying the Wii idea...but "gimped out?" It's more actually more accurate and works better. Since "gimped out" means "crappier...doesn't work as well...." I'd say your statement is incorrect.

  51. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously did you think Sony was holding back on something that would move a lot of units simply by flicking the "on" switch?

  52. wtf? Troll mod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job, Slashdot: modding the OP as troll. Do note the OP happens to be one of the biggest contributors to the Wii homebrew scene and one of the developers for the Homebrew Channel and BootMii, among many other things. Offtopic? Perhaps, slightly. Troll? Jesus fucking Christ, Slashdot.

  53. real legitimate reasons for wanting to "backup" by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 1

    I have a 40GB PS-Fat. The blu-ray laser has died on me already. I've replaced it since, but that was a $60 item and time. Near the end of the cycle of these consoles, I can see a perfectly good use for this jailbreak. If my laser dies again (which apparently it's certain to do!) then if I have all my games backed up to the drive, I can still play them! (True I won't be able to buy any more, but that's ok, my gaming has slowed down in my old age any how)

    I'm seriously looking into this HD upgrade then jailbreak then backing up the games to a HD deal. It would give me great peace of mind and work around a defect that sony won't own up to. Plus things would load faster! That's just win-win-win as far as I can see.

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    1. Re:real legitimate reasons for wanting to "backup" by luther349 · · Score: 1

      until your hdd takes a dump lol. but i have herd of the first gen ps3 and the blue ray issue.fixed in later models i just rember there boast abought not failing like 360s then the lasers started failing in mass. ill never own a ps3 sony has been full of suck and fail so bad lately. ps3 has no epic games other then Resistance.

  54. good they lost by luther349 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i don't side with sony with this war. before i did. ps3 had linux so you would run all your homebrew and emulators on there. so the hacking for homebrew was never a issue. and homebrew hackers left the system alone. 1 hacker finds a way to expolite threw linux sony pulls linux. they opened the flood gates all on there own. and unfortunately braking open the securty to reenable homebrew also means the pirates get there way to. so sorry sony you only did this to yourself..

    1. Re:good they lost by judeancodersfront · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why are you blaming Sony and not the hacker that exploited OtherOS and ruined it for everyone else?

    2. Re:good they lost by Andorin · · Score: 1

      > Why are you blaming Sony and not the hacker that exploited OtherOS and ruined it for everyone else?
      Because that hacker was perfectly in his rights to do what he did?

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    3. Re:good they lost by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Because two wrongs don't make a right?

      Sony removing advertised features in a firmware update (required to play future games) is wrong.

    4. Re:good they lost by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because I don't blame the woman whose husband beats her when dinner is undercooked.

    5. Re:good they lost by judeancodersfront · · Score: 0, Troll

      Comparing spousal abuse to a hack that allows pirated games to be played.

      Well I guess this is Slashdot.

  55. Re:Banned from PSN... by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

    I do think the OtherOS issue is important but overblown. Like a lot of other things that really matter, not enough people care.

    On the other hand, removing PS2 compatibility from the hardware is a big deal. That's taking about $100 USD away from the value of the console in my (narrow) opinion.

  56. Re:Banned from PSN... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's the point of a 250GB drive it all I have on it are dinky PSN games?

    Bragging rights over 360 console owners.

  57. Re:Banned from PSN... by deek · · Score: 1

    Actually, the Move controller could be a very interesting replacement for a mouse, when using a GUI on a large screen TV. It alleviates the need of a surface to navigate on, and possibly has the required precision to accurately aim the pointer.

    If somebody manages to get Linux working again on the PS3 via the hack, I'll be trying to get the Move controller working with it. It'd be an interesting project.

  58. Re:Banned from PSN... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    haven't those PS3 fanboys spent the last few years yelling about what a useless gimmick motion control is?

    Reminds me of some other fanyboys who used to taut how much better PowerPC chips were than Intel chips. Until their team switched chips of course...

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  59. Re:Banned from PSN... by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

    When will twits like you realize that they removed and advertised feature!? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills! If Ford decided to remove an advertised heated steering wheel remotely, would you be okay with that even if it only affected drivers in cold climates? How about if Microsoft could remotely disable DVD drives because they could be used to pirate Windows? Where does it end?

    --
    "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
  60. heh... by smash · · Score: 1

    Wonder how long this will take to get bundled into otherwise innocuous looking iphone apps, and inserted into the app store :D

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  61. The PS2 "Slim" by westlake · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, removing PS2 compatibility from the hardware is a big deal. That's taking about $100 USD away from the value of the console in my (narrow) opinion.

    Full compatibility with the PS2 would add about $100 to the retail price.

    The PS2 "Slim" with Ethernet and Dial-Up Modem is $100 at Amazon.com. Amusingly enough, it was the PS2 "Slim" which axed PS2 Linux. Something which seems to have been forgotten hereabouts.

    1. Re:The PS2 "Slim" by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Full compatibility with the PS2 would add about $100 to the retail price.

      I'm not sure. A custom ASIC to do the work of a PS2 would probably cost less than 10 bucks (an out-of-my-ass guess). The PS3 already has an an optical drive, chassis, power supply, controllers and controller interface, memory for saving games, TV output hardware, marketing and branding presence, regulatory permits, format licensing, network infrastructure, and complete supply chain.

      The silicon is not the main cost factor in a PS2.

  62. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? This is a little pond filled with tiny fish. You can piss off everyone who visits this site and the world will little note nor long remember.

  63. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Well, IF the PS3 is unlocked fully and the homebrew scene develops properly, and IF the performance is as good as it should be, and IF some clever people get on it, it may be possible to port he pcsx2 emulator to the PS3.

    It would take quite a bit of work, AFAICT, because the current emulator is heavily tied to x86/x86_64 and x86 extensions, but with a bit of work it could be possible.

  64. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Really?

    That's a shame, as I'm sure more than a few folks would be interested in trying to get pcsx2 running on there.

  65. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Nursie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "And the latest report is that the next firmware update is going to disable the USB ports"

    BULLSHIT.

    Sorry, but I have to call this one out for what it is.

    The USB ports are how the controllers are used during certain updates or if they're out of power. The USB ports also are how you plug in things like the Playstation Eye, a peripheral that Sony themselves sell and are relying on for their "Move" push.

    They will not now, nor ever, disable the USB ports, this is some sort of forum echo-chamber nonsense or an outright troll that's somehow gained credence.

    Especially when an update to their USB driver will destroy this jailbreak just as well.

  66. 3.42 has been released...news anyone? by Coldeagle · · Score: 1

    Just noticed that 3.42 has been released. Nothing posted on the official PS3 website...I wonder what it's going to do? Keep an eye out here. Figures...I did one update since I'll be able to use Linux now and Sony has to come and spoil my fun.

    1. Re:3.42 has been released...news anyone? by Coldeagle · · Score: 0

      Update...bypass has been "patched". Let's cross our fingers that it's something that's easily bypassed.

      Folks, DO NOT update to 3.42!

  67. Re:Banned from PSN... by westlake · · Score: 1

    Not everybody's idea of an enjoyable gaming experience involves trading insults with hormonal 15 year-olds, nor does $300 meet everyone's definition of "expensive." Jailbreaking is appropriate for anyone who either doesn't care about online features, can afford two consoles, or both. I suspect that's a not-insignificant portion of current and potential owners.

    Online features include firmware upgrades for new Blu-Ray releases.

    Upgrades to 1080p 3D video for Blu-Ray movies and game play, the Move controller, DLC and services like Facebook, Netflix, PSOne Classics, PlayStation Home, and so on.

    There is something for everyone in the family here.

    "Red Dead Redemption" in 3D?

    The best adult western since "Deadwood?"

    "Bioshock Infinity?"

    For games like these, you want the home theater experience in all its glory - and it isn't going to happen without that firmware upgrade.

    If you can afford two consoles, you can afford an unconstrained Linux-based media PC. I'm sorry, but the cold hard truth is that the OtherOS doesn't have all that much value.
           

  68. Re:Banned from PSN... by judeancodersfront · · Score: 0, Troll

    Those aren't designed for the purpose of piracy and have plenty of legitimate uses.

    You know what is worse than a scumbag defense attorney? Someone who acts like one in casual conversation. We all know why this device exists, cut the bullshit already.

  69. Re:Banned from PSN... by westlake · · Score: 1

    HD loaders on the Wii have been a godsend to me, with a 2 year old (a couple years ago). It didn't take her long to find that the eject button gave her a nice toy to throw around the house.

    Reminds me of when my nephew discovered the peanut butter sandwich - and gave a whole new meaning to the phrase "slot-loading."

  70. The Other OS option was used to hack it by judeancodersfront · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's why they removed it. It had already been used to compromise the security.

    I got voted down for pointing this out before, I guess some realities are just too harsh here? Or perhaps SONY BAD is the only acceptable opinion?

    1. Re:The Other OS option was used to hack it by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Even if that was 100% true, it does not justify what they did. It means they stole value from their customers to protect themselves. I have determined that your car could run me over, for security reasons I have slashed all 4 tires.

  71. pc piracy rates are the problem by judeancodersfront · · Score: 3, Informative

    While there is piracy on the consoles it isn't like the pc where most of the people playing the games aren't paying for them.

    That isn't an exaggeration, numerous indy developers have reported piracy rates of over 80%. Just be glad there are enough sales on the pc to still justify console ports.

    1. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by Andorin · · Score: 1

      > That isn't an exaggeration, numerous indy developers have reported piracy rates of over 80%.
      Which is a completely meaningless statistic on its own. I'm sure numerous indy developers would prefer 2000 sales and 8000 unauthorized downloads to 1000 sales and 0 downloads.

      But hey, any excuse to bash those pirates, right?

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    2. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh those poor pirates. No one recognizes the noble sacrifices they have to make to keep themselves engorged on free entertainment.

    3. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by Andorin · · Score: 1

      Obvious trolling doesn't work. You have to be more subtle than that.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    4. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's impossible to tell what would happen in a "perfect" world. Would perfect DRM get 1000 sales? 2000? 10000?

      My pet theory is actually that most games are overpriced--that sales would be significantly higher than double at half the price. I don't have anything to back that up, though. I don't buy many games, and I don't pirate any. I try to support open-source titles, and titles which don't have DRM, so I probably skew the stats slightly.

    5. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by julesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While there is piracy on the consoles it isn't like the pc where most of the people playing the games aren't paying for them.

      Yes. But until now, piracy on consoles has required hardware modifications, or at least unauthorized firmware updates that have a non-zero chance of bricking your console. This is now changing. IUIC, this hack allows you to run pirate games without modifying your console, just by hooking an external device (that large numbers of people already have) up to its USB port.

      That is to say, unlike previous hacks, this is a no-risk, no-cost hack that doesn't invalidate your warranty. Uptake is going to be *much* higher.

    6. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Which is a completely meaningless statistic on its own. I'm sure numerous indy developers would prefer 2000 sales and 8000

      No they'd proabably prefer 10,000 sales. But hey you can get it for free and don't see the consequences so who cares, right?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    7. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by Andorin · · Score: 1

      > No they'd proabably prefer 10,000 sales.
      Oh, I'm sure they would, but the point is moot since 8000 downloads != 8000 lost sales.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    8. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure they would, but the point is moot since 8000 downloads != 8000 lost sales.

      That is true, probably more like 2k but to be honest that's a number straight from my ass like alot of the figures thrown around.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      It's not trolling just because it doesn't match your opinion. Also, you responded, so technically, it would have worked.

      From now on I'll use your technique and just pull facts from my ass to bolster my points.

    10. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by Andorin · · Score: 1

      Note the following two statements:

      > Microsoft sucks cock. Their shitty fucking proprietary software makes you a slave to their corporate religion. Only the truly free and enlightened throw off the chains of M$ and embrace the pure open power of GNU/Linux. If you use Micro$oft Winblows, congratulations because you've proven to the world that you're a faggish corporate whore.

      > LOL @ Linux. The OS of filthy freetard communist hippies who can't afford anything that actually works. Here's an idea, since you're incapable of forming your own: Move out of your mom's basement, shave your beard, and get a fucking job. Grow up and pay for what you use. Get back on Windows like everyone else.

      They are different in that one is anti-Microsoft and one is anti-Linux. More importantly, they are the same because although both of them express an opinion which others might strongly disagree on, they do so in an inflammatory manner that doesn't add anything valuable to the thread. The posts are, essentially, a waste of bandwidth.

      Your post is much the same, hence the troll mod.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    11. Re:pc piracy rates are the problem by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Note my asshole, lingering over your forehead while you sleep. Note that I am stamping your forehead with my asshole.

  72. Re:Banned from PSN... by X.25 · · Score: 1

    First of all, this is just used for pirating purposes. In fact that's the only thing the hack allows, so drop the homebrew bullshit.

    Secondly, Sony has lost the PS3 hacking war? These hacks are fully detectable by PS3 and Sony. Those who have used them have already been banned from PSN and multiplayer games. What a great way to ruin your expensive console.

    I feel it's really cold in your little dark world...

  73. Re:Banned from PSN... by Andorin · · Score: 1

    What the technology is designed for is irrelevant in the face of what it does and what it's used for. And there are substantial legitimate reasons to jailbreak your PS3 that aren't piracy, including game backups and homebrew. To say that it is somehow wrong for someone to crack their PS3 purely because they might use it to pirate is silly.

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  74. Re:Banned from PSN... by X.25 · · Score: 1

    Something that so few care about hardly "ruins" a console.

    It ruins it for them, no?

    Oh, I see. If it doesn't affect you, than it's not important. If it doesn't affect 'majority', that it's not important either.

    Hope Vogons come soon, because it's hard to imagine the future of this planet when it's populated with retards like yourself...

  75. Re:Banned from PSN... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    If Ford disabled the heated steering wheel function, but the heated seats, heat, AC, power windows, headlights, signals, engine and transmission and everything else in the car still worked... it wouldn't be the end-of-my-world-panties-in-a-bunch thing that some PS3 owners are making it out to be.

  76. Re:Banned from PSN... by zaphod777 · · Score: 0

    PS3 firmware update was just rolled out this is effectively dead. My prediction is it will be another 10 years before the PS3 is hacked again.

    --
    "Don't Panic!"
  77. Re:wtf? Troll mod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah yeah, we all know who marcan is. just read his post history on /., the man is fucking brilliant. but that does not make him immune to down-moderation. i think it was deserved.

    he's extremely vocal about his anti-piracy ideology and that makes him quite annoying sometimes. he has to post in every thread about how many wii consoles waninkoko's code has bricked, and his claims become more outlandish and disconnected from reality every time he mentions it (we're up to 100% now :)

    sure, waninkoko may not be quite as talented as others, but he's providing something that MANY people want. and his tools do work. count how many people, even just in this thread, have praised the wii usb backup loader. whether you pirate wii games or not, the usb loader is a killer app for wii hacking. discs are obsolete.

    marcan deserves huge amounts of praise for his work in hacking the wii, but his ideology prevents him from taking it to the next level. that's fine, homebrew is a great great thing to have. but waninkoko put the puzzle pieces together and created another tool that makes the wii even better. sure, the pieces were already laid out for him and didn't take that much skill to put together, but at least he fucking DID it and RELEASED it. and for that I thank him.

  78. So? by Andorin · · Score: 1

    > The Other OS option was used to hack it. That's why they removed it. It had already been used to compromise the security.
    And that justifies remotely removing a function of the device after the sale? Telling somebody that they cannot hack a device they've bought is outrageous.

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  79. Re:Banned from PSN... by Andorin · · Score: 1

    First they came for my heated steering wheel, but I did not speak out, because I had heated seats, heat, AC, power windows, headlights, signals, engine and transmission...

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  80. Re:Banned from PSN... by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    Yeah, backups. That term still fools people, right?

    I agree with the OP. Drop the shenanigans and at least be an adult. Admit this is for piracy, with occasional, almost accidental legitimate usage. There's no points to be won here with your childish insistence of the existence of that dreamworld where this is targeted for "homebrew."

    And let's also be adults about that, because 99% of homebrew is emulating other consoles to play pirated ROMs. I mean, really. Who are you pretending for?

  81. It has been PATCHED! by cciRRus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Show's over.

    Apparently the latest firmware update fixes the USB exploit.

    Gaming site eXophase claims that, since Sony released firmware update 3.42 earlier today, it has been able to verify that "all variants of the USB-hub emulating exploit (PSFreedom, PSGroove, PSJailbreak) are no longer functional"

    --
    w00t
  82. Re:Banned from PSN... by Andorin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > I'm sorry, but the cold hard truth is that the OtherOS doesn't have all that much value.
    To you.

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  83. New firmware 3.42 patches the USB exploit by cciRRus · · Score: 5, Informative
    Unfortunately, you are spot on.

    http://exophase.com/ps3/ps3-firmware-3-42-hits-network-update-18063.htm:

    Update: We can confirm that all variants of the USB-hub emulating exploit (PSFreedom, PSGroove, PSJailbreak) are no longer functional in firmware 3.42.

    --
    w00t
  84. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Sancho · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's a lot of "if"s. And it's notoriously hard to get good performance out of the Cell, due to its multiprocessor nature. I'm not sure whether it's even theoretically possible to match the performance of the PS2 without having to coax multiple processors to cooperate. I haven't specifically heard of something like this being done, but if it were (generally) possible, you would expect it to have happened on the x86 or amd64 architectures. It would be a boon to virtualization. On the other hand, it could be that it's practically impossible without some sort of hardware support--though I wouldn't necessarily expect the Cell to have such support.

    I'm inclined to think that my best best is to just see what kind of performance I can eek out of my Mac mini with pcsx2 (connected to the TV.) Unfortunately, my suspicion is that the graphics won't be up to par. Just have to sit down one day and see.

  85. Re:Banned from PSN... by Andorin · · Score: 1

    Did you intentionally ignore the content of my post, or simply forget to read it?

    >I agree with the OP. Drop the shenanigans and at least be an adult. Admit this is for piracy, with occasional, almost accidental legitimate usage.

    I said that it doesn't matter why it was created; what matters is what's done with it. People have the right to back up their games, whether you like it or not.

    Oh, and who cares if it enables piracy? Piracy is the scapegoat for entertainment corporations, one of the boogeymen of the Internet. It doesn't cause substantial harm to anyone. Cracking down on it is unfair persecution of millions of otherwise innocent people. Too often it leads to persecution of non-pirates, those who are completely innocent. As we've seen with the OtherOS fuck-up.

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  86. Re:Banned from PSN... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "The "OtherOS" was never more than a very small part of the PS3 story"

    Don't worry, I think my class-action against Sony will be going ahead soon if my lawyers deem it fit. Then it'll make the news like Spore's DRM did.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  87. Re:Banned from PSN... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I care about the FALSE ADVERTISING. Taking somethign away after the fact is bait-and-switch. I paid for OtherOS, even if I don't use it, don't take it away from me, it's MINE, I paid for it.

    I have a problem with a company so blatantly breaking the law.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  88. Re:Banned from PSN... by Khyber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Quit griping about your submission pending for a week. Sometimes it takes MONTHS for shit to get posted/rejected around here, when the editors finally get around to actually doing work.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  89. Re:Banned from PSN... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    LAWL.

    Give me another two weeks of goofing off with the internals and I'll have thirty more ideas out for enterprising hackers to test out.

    Reddit has some nice programmers, if you know where to find them. :) And they LOVE ideas.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  90. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

    "without hardware assistance."

    Gee, I wonder what that fucking silicon all over the motherboard is called? Software?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  91. Actually, it has lost the PS/3 customer base by cheros · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given what Sony did by removing the "other OS" feature after it was used for a hack, I think I can safely say that there is no way you cannot trust Sony not to retrospectively kill other features later. I don't hack my PS/3, but the "other OS" feature was a reason for me to buy it, so the "upgrade" isn't (and has thus not happened) because I refuse to pay the price for something I didn't do, and lose a feature I PAID FOR and which is on the product description.

    Imagine what happens if someone finds a way to hack the box via a movie feature - given their approach to "other OS" it is not totally bizarre to expect them to nuke the "play video" feature in a next release, so thanks Sony, but there is not going to be another penny spent on anything PS/3, or anything else that is remote changeable. Quite simply, the PS/3 as a product is dead to me, and research for any new kit (whatever type) will certainly not begin with Sony.

    If a company cannot take into account a certain amount of customisation when it gets a device out in public it suggests it is totally hopeless at both market analysis and crisis management. To me, that spells "incompetence".

    No thanks.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  92. Re:Banned from PSN... by Sancho · · Score: 1

    I'm right there with you, man. I never had Other OS, but I'm livid that a company would take away an advertised feature through a firmware update.

  93. Re:Banned from PSN... by Sancho · · Score: 1

    Eh, not so much that they were better as that it wasn't fair to compare the hz of the two chips due to architectural differences. Hell, it's not fare to compare the hz of AMD vs Intel, or of different families in the Intel line.

    What was happening back then was that PPC chips were performing well enough, but at very low mhz compared to PC. PC users and manufacturers used the mhz difference to claim that their machines ran faster than Apples. It was actually fairly difficult to compare, since the software (OS) was so different, but frankly, Apple held its own in a lot of areas.

    The move to Intel was, I suspect, a perfect storm of cost, IBM's unwillingness to provide power-efficient processors, and relative ease of programming. That Apple claimed to be "twice as fast" (or whatever) during the switch was very, very unfortunate. Grasping onto the Mhz myth came all too easily to them. That doesn't negate the fact that the Mhz myth was, in fact, an issue.

    I had one of the last G4 iBooks before the line was discontinued and the Macbooks were introduced. There really wasn't a great speed difference between the last G4 iBook and the first Macbook, even though Apple (and fanboys) claimed that there was. It's still a neat little machine, though the LCD is cracked. It runs terminals and firefix just fine--as well as most low-end notebooks these days do.

  94. Re:Banned from PSN... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    HTPC's will set you back $400+ from scratch (especially if you want a decent looking case).

    Meh, I just got a Zotac MAG. Slim mini ITX, piano black, vertical or horizontal mount. Dual core Atoms, Nvidia ION, optical audio and HDMI audio/video. Does just fine. $250.

  95. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I wouldn't count on much!

    I had an Athlon64 3200+ with an ATI X800 Pro in it last time I tried. One or two things worked acceptably, R-Type Final springs to mind, but most things either failed totally or ran at an abysmal speed. I don't know what's in your Mac Mini, but macs haven't historically been that hot on graphics have they?

  96. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. I've been following this mod for exactly one reason: enabling PS2 games on PS3 versions which don't support that.

    You can play PS2 games on PS2. Is your apartment really that cramped there's no extra room for slim PS2? What's your excuse to "love to be able to disconnect my PS2 from my TV"?

  97. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Sancho · · Score: 1

    Macs haven't been known for having particularly good graphics. The latest Mini has a decent card (I think it's onboard Nvidia on the order of a 9400 mobile.) Nothing to sneeze at, but probably not suitable for emulating PS2 graphics.

    But hell, I can't keep up with model numbers anymore. There was a time when you could make a reasonable guess as to performance by the model. Now they go to great lengths to make it hard to figure out. A confused consumer is a vulnerable consumer, I guess.

  98. Re:Banned from PSN... by feepness · · Score: 1

    Hope Vogons come soon, because it's hard to imagine the future of this planet when it's populated with retards like yourself...

    As opposed to the people running around calling everyone else retards.

  99. costom Throw Pillow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use this throw pillow case to bring the latest color trends and images into your living area or bedroom. It measures about 18' x 18', can easily insert standard size pillows. The border and the backing is in black color. The zippered opening is designed for quick laundering. The black border and backing is made of 100% canvas cotton, and the image area is made of 100% polyester.

    Ideal image size in pixels (W * H) :
    Front(Center) : 1200 x 1200 or Higher
    $10.99

    www.waazula.com

  100. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Nursie · · Score: 1

    The problem with model numbers is that they go around!

    That system was from 2005 IIRC, pretty cutting edge for the time but not so much now. Your Mac Mini is probably a bit more powerful than that, it's worth a try anyway!

  101. Time for Sony to make a quick buck by ilitirit · · Score: 1

    If I were Sony, I'd put off fixing this exploit for a while and watch PS3 sales go up. Only when sales slow down will I release the fix. I've read that the PS3 logs the ID's of every bit of software it runs, even offline. So if you've used the backup manager, chances are Sony can detect it when you go online. People are working on hacks to change the ID though.

    1. Re:Time for Sony to make a quick buck by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      If I were Sony, I'd put off fixing this exploit for a while and watch PS3 sales go up. Only when sales slow down will I release the fix. I've read that the PS3 logs the ID's of every bit of software it runs, even offline. So if you've used the backup manager, chances are Sony can detect it when you go online. People are working on hacks to change the ID though.

      They released firmware update 3.42 before you even posted (a few posters posted before you about it), so Sony's not taking that route.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  102. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    Really? That's... sick. I'm sorry, but that just seems really ridiculous. I heard that the the PS3's software emulation was bad, but at least it sounded like it had *some* games working purely on software emulation. The damn thing certainly has the processing power to do so!

    If Microsoft can make the Xbox 360 run so many classic Xbox games after changing damn near every part of the system (Intel x86 to IBM PPC, nVidia to ATI graphics, RAM that's 3.5 times as fast...) then Sony sure as hell *ought* to be able to make software emulation work. The Cell processor is well-suited for this, too; like the Xbox 360 processor it has far more hardware threads, running at far higher speeds, than the older CPU. It should be possible to do dynamic recompilation on the other cores and get a near-perfect PS2 emulator running at (PS2) native speed.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  103. Re:Banned from PSN... by zaphod777 · · Score: 0

    But I am guessing Sony has turned off the USB ports during boot along with some other security updates so they will need to come up with a new exploit and it has taken 5 years so far. I am sure someone can find something sooner than later but it won't be soon. I just wonder if people will get their consoles banned if Sony detects they are using the hack on a PS3.

    --
    "Don't Panic!"
  104. Re:Banned from PSN... by lilo_booter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be fair, it should be noted that the unhacked PS3 provides a pretty decent media centre - easily extendible (by way of UPnP media servers) to play pretty much anything too.

  105. Re:Banned from PSN... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    What's the point of a 250GB drive it all I have on it are dinky PSN games?

    Bragging rights over 360 console owners.

    I got a 250GB on my 360 chock full of full and arcade games. Does that get me the bragging rights.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  106. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understood that the OtherOS was simply to avoid tax when importing into Europe? What I want is for Sony to pay their taxes! I wonder how much money they avoided paying? I would have thought that the tax man would be chasing Sony now.

    I personally think that you should be able to save your games to HD to avoid using the bluray all the time. Of course this would still need the disk to check you have it, but would then run off HD. It sucks that if the bluray dies, your're stuck with the downloaded games (which are limited).

    Online is much more fun than playing a game on your own so if you're into gaming I would say you'd need two consoles... One to hack and keep offline and another for general use and keeping legit.

  107. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you are going to leave your PS3 on for 5+hrs a day?

    I wouln't if I were you as they get too hot and are not designed for sustained use... Also when it dies you won't be easily able to repair unless it's just the HD. I know you can get a cooler to try and keep things working, but I don't know how much these help keep the temp within tolerable limits.

    I built my own HTPC and it's twice the size of the PS3, and 1 1/2 time the graphics processing power. It doesn't get anywhere near as hot on the exhaust vents as there is more space and air flow. It also has better mesh to stop fluff and dust being sucked up internally and can be fully cleaned in seconds.

    A friend of mine asked about installing Windows XP onto his PS3 and I had to tell him to stop being a idiot and just keep it as a gaming / media system and stick to a PC for Windows.

  108. Re:Banned from PSN... by irwtdvoys · · Score: 1

    I personally think that you should be able to save your games to HD to avoid using the bluray all the time. Of course this would still need the disk to check you have it, but would then run off HD. It sucks that if the bluray dies, your're stuck with the downloaded games (which are limited).

    Surely if the Bluray dies it won't be able to check you have the disc...

  109. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the best features on the 360 is the ability to install games to the hard drive in order to increase load times and reduce the noise from that ridiculously noisy DVD drive (in fact I have one of the new "slim" versions, and can honestly say when playing a game from the HDD it's whisper quiet, whereas my old original 360 sounded like a 747 during take off), so I can second the usefulness of this. In fact the only thing that ruins that experience is that I still need to have the disk physically in the drive to play the game, and since I have a console in the bedroom and one in the living room it's still annoying swapping disks around and would be great if I could run the game on either console without the disk.

  110. Re:Banned from PSN... by delinear · · Score: 1

    I have a 360. I have a 250GB hard drive. In fact, I have two (the Modern Warfare special edition "super elite" and the new slim) and they both have 250GB hard drives.

  111. Great idea! by RichiH · · Score: 1

    > If they don't get off their ass and release it I'm going to have to go buy a Sony 3D Blu-Ray player...

    Punish them by giving them money! Also, please punish me. I can send you my banking information.

  112. Re:Banned from PSN... by fiendie · · Score: 2, Informative

    250 GB won't last very long. Especially the PS3 exclusive titles fill out those BDs pretty good.

    Uncharted 2 was around 39 GB as was God of War III. Heavy Rain used up about 28 GB.

    I would love to install at least the game I am currently playing to the HD to decrease load times but I can understand why they left the feature out.

    Your average XBox 360 game is roughly 7 GB. I guess Sony just puts a lot of uncompressed textures and sound files on their discs.

  113. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a difference between pointing out when someone is being self centred, and actually being self centred. One day you might learn to recognise that, and that day will be when you stop being self centred.

    No doubt, it won't be here any day soon.

  114. Re:Banned from PSN... by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 1

    What's the point of a 250GB drive it all I have on it are dinky PSN games?

    Bragging rights over 360 console owners.

    My XBox 360 came with a 250GB HDD, and I can install my games to the HDD for improved load times without hacking my console.

  115. Re:Banned from PSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same boat here.

    Had more then a few orginal xboxs hacked for XBMC, now think about that, more then a few. Would i have bought more then one ever for more then playing games? i don't think so, but the fact that i could have all my content centralised on hand with a remote to boot was fantastic and i am sure that i influenced a few mates with my streaming of music, movies and pics to my xbox so in the end some people who wouldn't have ever bought one, did. I guess this dosn't make much of a difference if the console never makes the company any money.

  116. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    Really? That's... sick. I'm sorry, but that just seems really ridiculous. I heard that the the PS3's software emulation was bad, but at least it sounded like it had *some* games working purely on software emulation. The damn thing certainly has the processing power to do so!

    Nope, the PS3s with software emulation still had the PS2 video hardware present. The 40GB PS3 dropped even that, as did any subsequent models (newer 80GB model, all Slim models).

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  117. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by blowfly7012 · · Score: 1

    I think someone's exploited your sarcasm filter. Best get Sony to remove it completely for you.

  118. Re:Banned from PSN... by morari · · Score: 1

    I've seen no indications at all that it actually works better. In fact, it seems that the press at large is pretty disappointed in it because of a lack of accuracy in the launch titles. Sony really should have come out of the gates with working software to demonstrate how "superior" their hardware is, especially since Nintendo has already worked out all the little gameplay and interface problems for them. There's no excuse not to be on par this late in the game.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  119. Re:Naturally, the usual OMGWTFPIRACY folks arrive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't put it past them. They'll probably disable the Blu-ray drive at some point too.

    First they came for backwards compatibility,
    and I did not speak up, because I did not play PS2.

    Then they came for OtherOS,
    and I did not speak up, because I did not play linux.

    Then they came for the USB ports,
    and I did not speak up, because my controllers were not unpaired.

    Then they came for my Blu-ray drive,
    and now I just watch Netflix.

  120. mobile phones by masini · · Score: 0

    Everything that happens now must be linked to mobile phones. And this is the current development and future direction should be. Mobility is very important nowadays.auto parts stores

  121. Re:Banned from PSN... by Nikker · · Score: 1

    So you are saying the PS3 design is just plain garbage, I guess I can see that. Other than to boot the OS all the media will be on a server. A single BluRay title is still only about 3hrs max. Maybe if I get a couple years out of it I can gut it and throw in a mini-ITX board with an ION and a couple Atoms in it. Either way $299 ain't that bad. Maybe there is some cool stuff I can poke around and learn about with these fancy processors. Maybe it will be fun to compile rainbow tables with it, maybe not...

    Either way just hacking it for the sake of hacking it is not only ok it's also fun. As far as getting kicked off of Sony's servers well you see I didn't pay for those so I don't really care. As far as installing windows ... Well I wouldn't do that to many machines let alone one I own.

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.