Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay Down; Police Raids Across Europe

Stoobalou contributes a link to this story at Thinq.co.uk, from which he excerpts: "Torrent-tracking site The Pirate Bay is currently unavailable as reports come in of co-ordinated police raids against file sharers across Europe. Police in up to 14 countries carried out raids against suspected file-sharing servers this morning. According to file-sharing news site TorrentFreak, the bulk of police action seems to have taken place in Sweden. Swedish Internet service provider ISP, which hosts both The Pirate Bay and whistle-blowing site WikiLeaks, earlier denied rumours of a police raid, saying that officers had visited them to ask questions over two suspect IP addresses, and that no computers or other goods had been seized."

325 comments

  1. What ? by zero.kalvin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thepiratebay.org ? I just opened it, to check this. It works fine!

    1. Re:What ? by jonnythan · · Score: 1, Informative

      The TPB trackers are down, though. uTorrent is saying they are actively refusing connection.

    2. Re:What ? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 4, Funny

      A comment on TFA says it came back up within 2 minutes.

      Contingency plan?

    3. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      seems to be down in the US

    4. Re:What ? by Spritzer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's down for me. Perhaps, being the "The world's most resilient BitTorrent site", they are back up and running elsewhere and DNS updates haven't made it my way yet.

    5. Re:What ? by kju · · Score: 5, Informative

      The TPB trackers are down, though.

      As they were already shutdown last year (and after announcing the intent to do so) this is hardly news.

    6. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast just pulled up the website, didn't check any torrents though...

    7. Re:What ? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      Umm does TPB *have* trackers anymore? I thought they only used openbittorrent, which is officially a separate organization and open to non-TPB torrents too. I know the MAFIAA has been looking for way to link them together, but as far as I know they never could...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:What ? by gid · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Pirate Bay shut down the trackers awhile ago. From Wikipedia:

      On 17 November 2009, The Pirate Bay shut off its tracker service permanently, stating that centralized trackers are no longer needed, since distributed hash tables (DHT), peer exchange (PEX), and magnet links allow peers to find each other and content in a decentralized way.

    9. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Must be a DNS thing. It works from my office network via AT&T but not my home network via Windstream. Of course, it could be that nothing works reliably with Windstream.

    10. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was down about 1 hour ago, a completely random visit...

      The Pirate Bay: The world's most resilient bittorrent site

    11. Re:What ? by avg_joe_01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reports of their death have been greatly exaggerated.

    12. Re:What ? by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Eh, can get to main page, and even the to the browse torrent page, but no further.

    13. Re:What ? by dominious · · Score: 1

      well, wtf then, because here it is not responding!

    14. Re:What ? by Kugrian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Instead of dupes, ./ are now reporting the future. The extra load on the servers from people checking if it's up or not will take it down.

    15. Re:What ? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, it's called Distributed Hash Tables and Peer Exchange. TPB hasn't been a tracker site in quite a while.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    16. Re:What ? by CarpetShark · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Contingency plan?

      Yes, chain contingency actually. Well spotted.

    17. Re:What ? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work for me with Bredbandsbolaget and if they lost all the three Bs (Bredbandsbolaget, Bahnhof, Bredband2) we're doomed!" :D

      Should had been hosted around the universities instead =P. I wonder if Sunet would had given a shit?

      (Heh, damn people up north stealing all the bandwidth! http://stats.sunet.se/top10.html)

    18. Re:What ? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I'm uploading at 100KB/sec through comcast right now.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    19. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really seems to be down, i tried to do a search and it times out everytime. Can you confirm that?

    20. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://thepiratebay.org/ is currently down.

      https://thepiratebay.org/ is up.

    21. Re:What ? by organgtool · · Score: 5, Funny

      Instead of dupes, ./ are now reporting the future

      My current directory is reporting the future?! I can't believe it! My terminal just simply started spitting out all sorts of useful advice above events that haven't happened yet. I performed the pwd command to figure out which magical directory I had entered, but then my computer imploded! I didn't have a chance to copy the terminal output to my USB drive. Now I'll never be able to know what happens in the future!

    22. Re:What ? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As they were already shutdown last year (and after announcing the intent to do so) this is hardly news.

      I guess the "news" part is that the Unified World Corporate Government has launched another public relations attack against TPB.

      Like the recent wikileaks attack, we will soon have a few rounds of "news" stories about how The Pirate Bay supports terrorism and child pornography and how the principle people behind The Pirate Bay and The Pirate Party are really horrible people, probably rapists or child molesters.

      There will be raids on their personal property where their homes and property will be "accidentally" damaged and their cellular phones and televisions and their kids' computer equipment will be "seized" as evidence.

      But filesharing will continue, because it's still about the best marketing tool the entertainment industry has.

      Now move along, there will be no congregating here.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    23. Re:What ? by timlyg · · Score: 0

      it's skynet!

    24. Re:What ? by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Torrents you've already got won't be affeted by thepiratebay.org going down. The web site is only used to distribute the torrent files and magnet links. Once you've got that, then you find other peers either through the openbittorrent.com tracker or the trackerless alternatives.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    25. Re:What ? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Are you not using Google DNS? Set your DNS servers to 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 ...

      --
      No sig today...
    26. Re:What ? by spyked · · Score: 1

      I guess it must be the 1st of April.

    27. Re:What ? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google DNS is good - but subject to DNS hijacking. I used them for awhile, then realized that a mistype showed me some odd adverts. Running Namebench revealed that my DNS queries were being hijacked by my ISP, so I switched to another DNS server that wasn't being hijacked. Avoid the most popular servers, or you'll be hijacked too!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    28. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'll never be able to know what happens in the future!

      I am almost sure that you will know it tomorrow.

    29. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of dupes, ./ are now reporting the future. The extra load on the servers from people checking if it's up or not will take it down.

      Yeah, DotSlash is always ahead of the curve.

    30. Re:What ? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to Stephen Hawking, your computer imploded because of an uncontrolled feedback loop.

      And yes, you're be able to know what happens in the future, simply wait until it's no longer the future.

    31. Re:What ? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yeah if you don't send pwd's output to a file, the output just prints to the terminal, then bye bye computer...the default future output is 1 week so it should reappear on your desk then. Make sure you keep the desk clear of any objects like cats, or some destructive overwriting could occur.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    32. Re:What ? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "DNS updates haven't made it my way yet."

      You and everyone else it seems, since downforeveryoneorjustme.com is reporting thepiratebay.org as down too. When they say a site's down it's down, bit more reliable than some forum post.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    33. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the future:
      http://timelol.ytmnd.com/

    34. Re:What ? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > Now I'll never be able to know what happens in the future!

      I have a time machine that travels forward in time at a rate of sixty seconds per minute.

      Would you like to rent it? The resemblance to a phone booth is purely coincidental.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    35. Re:What ? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      My ISP does that.

      They also have a handly little checkbox in my account details that turns it off.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    36. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if /. reports the past, then ./ reports the future.

      Also, http://xkcd.com/209/

    37. Re:What ? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      really? Google DNS can be hijacked?

      I have my DNS server set at 8.8.8.8, my ISP can hijack it?? Is that even legal?

    38. Re:What ? by nomadic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      But filesharing will continue, because it's still about the best marketing tool the entertainment industry has.

      Right, because when people get something for free consistently, they tend to spontaneously decide to pay for that thing.

    39. Re:What ? by medelliadegray · · Score: 1

      I would notify your state's attorney general of that. That is tampering with YOUR data & packets--surely breaking some laws out there.

      --
      Troll, Troll, go away and flame again some other day
    40. Re:What ? by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      When they say a site's down it's down, bit more reliable than some forum post.

      Or not. I got that result too, but then I clicked on the link (and I haven't visited TPB so it wasn't in my DNS or browser cache) and it popped right up.

      Using OpenDNS (208.67.222.222 208.67.220.220 ) for my DNS, btw.

    41. Re:What ? by Omestes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like the recent wikileaks attack, we will soon have a few rounds of "news" stories about how The Pirate Bay supports terrorism and child pornography and how the principle people behind The Pirate Bay and The Pirate Party are really horrible people, probably rapists or child molesters.

      Huh? Did I miss something? When and how was Wikileaks attacked?

      I suppose I also missed the advent of a unified world government, last I checked the governments of the world were still functioning like a severely autistic bowling team with bits of their brains removed at random. People who believe in some form of "new world order" have much more faith in humanity than I, I have a hard time even beleiving that 10 people can pull something off without a maximum degree of incompetence, and the potential level of incompetence goes up exponentially with every added member. By my reckoning, if you got every government in the world together, they couldn't even make toast without razing a rain-forest, starting a small nuclear war, and eventually burning the toast.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    42. Re:What ? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      It's a common occurance, really. Try namebench out, and see just what you can learn from it. http://code.google.com/p/namebench/ It's a simple script, namebench.py - it has an installer, but as I recall, you don't need to install at all. Just make sure it has execution permission, and fire up the main script. You may be surprised at what you learn. Or not - if you have a good ISP, they aren't stooping to such low levels!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    43. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, they only went down long enough for the CIA to install traffic monitoring systems. Nothing to see here, move along.

    44. Re:What ? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Huh? Did I miss something?

      Yes.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    45. Re:What ? by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    46. Re:What ? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      When and how was Wikileaks attacked?

      If the Slashdot headlines are any indication, Wikileaks has been being continuously attacked for awhile now.

      I suppose I also missed the advent of a unified world government, last I checked the governments of the world...

      There's no need for a world government: the U.S. one (okay, more like the MPAA) is pushing everybody around enough in regards to filesharing as it is.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    47. Re:What ? by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Note: Some Netgear routers hijack DNS (such as the WNR2000). You won't find this in the manual or the spec sheet.

      The hijack is benign; client devices are forced to use the DNS server configured in the router.

    48. Re:What ? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Artists make so little on their content from records/cd sales and so much from concert tours; it matters little too them if they and the lables are ripped off or not.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    49. Re:What ? by nullchar · · Score: 1

      The DNS response is a simple, plain text UDP packet. Google properly responds with the NXDOMAIN answer (or A record not found, whatever), and the ISP looks for those simple packets and replaces them with the A record of their shitty ad page.

      Unfortunately, DNSSEC is such a pain in the ass, from the registry updates, to the unique key signing key per zone, to the unique zone signing key, that no one wants to implement it.

      Solution: test if this happens with non-existent domains. If you're being hijacked, use a VPN (even if just for DNS queries, see dnsmasq), contact your ISP, or change ISPs.

    50. Re:What ? by severoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When will the authorities realize that this thing relies on inherent features of the Internet, and that it cannot be prevented by force without taking down the 'net itself?

      Look, hypothetical authority figure, encryption and digital signing and all the technology and math and science and engineering in the world can only protect communications between two trusted endpoints. In this context, "trust" means that both parties are trusted to only share the transacted information in a manner both sides deem appropriate.

      In the pair {music company, customer}, the customer is not a trusted endpoint. Any information sent to that person cannot in principle be protected. On the other hand, the endpoints {customer, everyone else} is by definition trusted because neither party cares what the other does with the information being transacted, so all actions are trusted.

      Do you see the problem now? Can you understand why spending millions more of the public's money chasing this phantom is a fundamental misunderstanding of technology? There's two ways to deal with this. Governments and corporations can: (a) continue tending toward more and more extreme actions in a futile attempt to control the information until they slide all the way over the fascist system that would be required to actually work, (b) recognize that we live in a free society where people's right to exchange information is worth protecting in spite of the fact that it can be abused. In this battle, we have a basic human right on one side of freedom to exchange information, and right to intellectual property on the other.

      The right to IP is not a fundamental human right! That's not to say it's not worth protecting at all, but not at the cost of something much more important!

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    51. Re:What ? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I've used Zoom, Zhone, and Actiontec DSL modem/routers. I always go into the configuration to set the default DNS server on the router, to avoid my ISP. For some reason, my backwoods ISP's server is always slower than ANYTHING else that I can find! I believe that I could use a server in Singapore, and get faster response than I do from my ISP. Of course, using a DNS cache speeds things up tremendously, but I always need something that isn't cached!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    52. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it matters lots to the labels...

    53. Re:What ? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      (c)
      a followed by people asserting b on the government and overthrowing it.

      I'm all for c.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    54. Re:What ? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that's supported by multiple studies.

      Quoting:

      Those who state that they download for free actually are the greatest consumers of paid music online

    55. Re:What ? by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      When will the authorities realize that this thing relies on inherent features of the Internet, and that it cannot be prevented by force without taking down the 'net itself?

      They already have. They're working on taking down "the net itself", but in the mean time they continue to fight by the usual methods, ineffectual as they may be.

    56. Re:What ? by Kitkoan · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    57. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then take down the net is what must do!

      VIVA LA RESISTANCE!

    58. Re:What ? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >> My current directory is reporting the future?! I can't believe it! My terminal just simply started spitting out all sorts of useful advice above events that haven't happened yet. I performed the pwd command to figure out which magical directory I had entered, but then my computer imploded! I didn't have a chance to copy the terminal output to my USB drive. Now I'll never be able to know what happens in the future!

      Well what happened was that your machine figured out all the winning lottery numbers for tonight's games and dumped them out to file. So it did it's job.. pulling data from the future.

      What's interesting though is that when the machine imploded it was really moving through time. You'll find it back on your desk in the morning, and you should be able to pick up tonight's lottery numbers at that time....

      --
      Huh?
    59. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That basic Human Right to the "Free Exchange of Information" is already protected: It is called the Right to Free Speech -- as enshrined in the Constitution of the US.

      It is a universal human right as democracy would be impossible without it. So, essentially, to protect copyright -- not a right at all -- these Nazis would have to burn the Constitution and eliminate all Free Societies on Planet Earth.

      Then again, that is probably precisely what those greedy media companies have planned for the future of the Human Race...

    60. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you man...you just made me cry.

    61. Re:What ? by lenwar · · Score: 1

      Yaarrr!! You insesitive clod...
      I happen to trust TPB wholeheartedly....

      --
      If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough
    62. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My terminal just simply started spitting out all sorts of useful advice above events that haven't happened yet.

      When you're mocking someone else's typo, be sure to proofread your own post. Unless the advice really is flying over the event like a giant "Whoosh".

    63. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,

      Yes!!?! You left out the full stop after 'all"

    64. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governments and corporations can: (a)...

      (b) recognize that we live in a free society where people's right to exchange information is worth protecting in spite of the fact that it can be abused.

      how do you know abusing is not intended?

    65. Re:What ? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe for you, but for me, it is closed, and also I wonder if this is a real story, or just some ISPs banning together and sending a blocked or can't find page to the browsers, even though maybe the site really is still up somewhere else in the world where the ISPs are not blocking it. All I know is this sucks, TPB is good for sharing content, i guess now will have to log unto another site for now....maybe if we had volunteers to host more and more of these torrent files for searching, then they would give up, unless they plan to put EVERYBODY behind bars...

    66. Re:What ? by severoon · · Score: 1

      Why do you think I'm only referring to unintended abuse? (I'm not.)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    67. Re:What ? by ohtani · · Score: 1

      Fuckin' magnet links. How do THEY work?!

      --
      Pancakes. Oh I blew it.
    68. Re:What ? by dpastern · · Score: 1

      And the sad thing is, the ordinary person is stupid enough to believe any fabrications that will/are made against TPB. Whilst I don't agree with piracy, I definitely don't agree with the harassment that is currently going on over TPB members and equipment. Perhaps the Swedish government (as well as others) should grow a backbone and tell the US government to fuck off?

      Dave

      --
      Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. --Martin Luther King Jr.
  2. Still available for me by weeble · · Score: 1, Redundant

    thepiratebay.org is still available to me here in Sweden.

    --
    Slashdot Beta should die a painful death.
  3. Umm... by shakezula · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Far be it from me to say that a /. submitter would rush to publish--but, as of the time of this posting, TBP is not down or offline. I simply stuck the URL in my browser, perhaps too rudimentary a method for testing?

    --
    I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
    1. Re:Umm... by zero.kalvin · · Score: 1

      Apparently he couldn't. What's with all these ill-done stories on slashdot ?

    2. Re:Umm... by kju · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to an update dated 14:02 GMT (just two minutes before you commented) in TFA the site just came back online. So it probably WAS down when the article was published and there is no justification for snippy remarks like yours.

    3. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to an update dated 14:02 GMT (just two minutes before you commented) in TFA the site just came back online. So it probably WAS down when the article was published and there is no justification for snippy remarks like yours.

      According to my reckoning, it takes longer than two minutes to read through a /. post (and maybe TFA), so GP probably never saw the update dated 14:02 GMT, and there is no justification for snippy remarks like yours.

    4. Re:Umm... by MrHanky · · Score: 4, Informative

      As always, the story was outdated before it had come through Slashdot's rigorous editing process.

    5. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are an idiot.

    6. Re:Umm... by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1, Funny

      And just think of how outdated it will be the next time it comes through.

    7. Re:Umm... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      As always, the story was outdated before it had come through Slashdot's rigorous editing process.

      And by that you mean, of course, simply clicking on the post button.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    8. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and you, sir, are a dirty Troll. Dirty dirty, dirty troll.

    9. Re:Umm... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should just stop doing that. The rigorous editing I mean. Then the articles may become a bit more current.

  4. still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too hard to check a site before submitting the story?

    1. Re:still up by Superken7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      TPB *was* taken down, doesn't mean it would last forever. Thankfully, Its been back up since at least 14:02 local time.

      Too hard to check TFA before posting? (joke ;)

    2. Re:still up by cyrano.mac · · Score: 1

      TPB hasn't been "down" today more than any other day. I run a monitor on it and it shows some "down" time every day. "Down" just means awfully slow...

  5. Re:Down? by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

    and it works fine in belgium too. I think the idea was to get it slashdotted, but they seem to have failed.

    --
    new sig
  6. Past Due! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now that governments across the globe are mobilizing armed men to eliminate file sharers, the world will be a perfect place. Certainly there is nothing worse than file sharing going on if this is their priority.

    1. Re:Past Due! by Dotren · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All of those other things you speak of can be monetized in some way by various corporations and governments. I don't think any of them have really found a good way of making money off of file sharing since their ridiculously large "winnings" in court are more than many people see in their entire lifetimes and therefore probably never get paid.

    2. Re:Past Due! by AnonymousClown · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, if we could figure out a way to prove that terrorism, hunger, poverty, AIDS, or whatever injustice hurts the corporate bottom line, we'd see action being taken to clear it up in no time?

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:Past Due! by disi · · Score: 1

      I am wondering how much money this costs again
      The media industry claims to loose money and then sends our ploice force out to raid us and we pay for it...

    4. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it does not matter if it is provable or not. What matters is if you can make the corporations believe all those thing hurt them. Then those things will be taken care of.

    5. Re:Past Due! by ScentCone · · Score: 0, Troll

      Certainly there is nothing worse than file sharing going on if this is their priority.

      And as we all know, it's impossible for law enforcement agencies to do more than one thing at a time. That's why they stop arresting drunk drivers whenever they hear about a case of domestic violence, or have to give up investigations of child trafficking or currency countfeiting whenever there's been a bank robbery across town.

      Now that governments across the globe are mobilizing armed men to eliminate file sharers, the world will be a perfect place

      How is that bit of childish sophistry any different than saying, "Now that businesses and loose affiliations of people all across the globe have formed organizations and web sites built specifically to enable ripping things off, the world will be a perfect place" ... huh? What's the part that gets you so upset ... that a country's laws are being enforced? If so, then your problem is with the laws enacted by the legislators in those countries, not with the fact that law enforcement officers doing a difficult job happen to be armed as part of their office. If your problem is that the officers are armed, and not with the fact that they're enforcing the law, then make a better case for the fact that officers executing warrants never walk into situations where someone crazy might try to hurt them.

      Or are you mostly just pissed because it seems fewer people than you'd like agree with you about the positive aspects of institutions built around, and publicly celebrating the ripping off of creative people? I suppose this is where you say that authors, musicians, performers, film makers, photographers, actors and all the rest have no choice but to work for The Man, and thus you're doing them a favor by ripping them off, right? That the world is a better place when some 12 year old gets to make an entertainment slave out of their favorite musician?

      Or should we stick wiht your original logic, and wonder why anyone should be allowed to enjoy music (ripped off or otherwise) when there's a single unhappy person in the world, or a single mosquito biting a quadraplegic somewhere? After all, we can only focus on one thing at a time, right?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Past Due! by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, if we could figure out a way to prove that terrorism, hunger, poverty, AIDS, or whatever injustice hurts the corporate bottom line, we'd see action being taken to clear it up in no time?

      You mean, like perhaps the billions of dollars every year that the private sector pours into NGOs that try to educate people in terrorism-spawning hotbeds, into HIV treatment and vaccination programs, etc? Like that?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:Past Due! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Or are you mostly just pissed because it seems fewer people than you'd like agree with you about the positive aspects of institutions built around, and publicly celebrating the ripping off of creative people? I suppose this is where you say that authors, musicians, performers, film makers, photographers, actors and all the rest have no choice but to work for The Man, and thus you're doing them a favor by ripping them off, right? That the world is a better place when some 12 year old gets to make an entertainment slave out of their favorite musician?

      Put words in other people's mouths much?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:Past Due! by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 5, Informative

      I got pulled over once after blowing through 2 stop signs in under 10 feet. I had been playing GTA for 4 days straight since my car was iced in, so wasn't used to stopping. The cop informed me why I was pulled over, and then got an alert and hurriedly said "I could give you a ticket for both of those" and ran back to his car.

      So yeah, it's possible. I can't find a source off hand, but a few weeks ago either /. or Fark had a story about reducing missing persons investigators, and a few months before that ramping up copyright operations. So my little anecdote aside, the sizes of the teams responsible for different types of crime are being re-allocated. That takes it from 'possible' to 'happening'. Maybe not on the scale of gp post, and certainly not to the extent of your binary logic, but yes happening.

    9. Re:Past Due! by radtea · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So, if we could figure out a way to prove that terrorism, hunger, poverty, AIDS, or whatever injustice hurts the corporate bottom line, we'd see action being taken to clear it up in no time?

      Close, but "hurting the bottom line" isn't enough because the Right is no more interested in money than the Left is interested in social justice. Both are interested in exactly one thing: power.

      Capitalists get power from making money, but power--unlike profit--is a zero-sum game. This means that capitalists are willing to forego profits if that is necessary to prevent other people from gaining power.

      That is, capitalists hate free-riders far more than they love money, so they are more than willing to lose customers to AIDS because curing AIDS for free would mean that someone else might also profit from those customers, and that would reduce the capitalist's feeling of power.

      If wiping out hunger, poverty AIDS or terrorism would actually make someone money, then yes, it would be done very rapidly, the way slavery went out of style the moment it became more profitable to have consumer goods for sale to paid workers who could be controlled almost as well as slaves by debt.

      Unfortunately, capitalists have learned that genuinely fixing problems is rarely the way to maximize their power. Far better to sell a more-or-less ineffective "solution" like the security-industrial complex's "War on Terror" or drug cocktails for AIDS or subsidized "food aid" for povery and hunger. Insert your corporation into one of those cash torrents and you will be in a position of power for decades to come.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    10. Re:Past Due! by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      Now that governments across the globe are mobilizing armed men to eliminate file sharers, the world will be a perfect place. Certainly there is nothing worse than file sharing going on if this is their priority.

      Nowhere does it say the policemen were armed (what for anyway).

      They come in, show their warrent, question and seize equipment. If you share files, you will not see a jail from inside nor a gun pointed at you. You watch too much TV (or anti-filesharing commercials).

      This action seems very reasonable. Usually file sharing *is* treated as a minor violation, seldomly the law is not executed on private persons; unless they make profit from it.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    11. Re:Past Due! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, they only point guns at you and put you in jail if you do something really dangerous, like having marijuana in your home.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    12. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that governments across the globe are mobilizing armed men to eliminate file sharers, the world will be a perfect place. Certainly there is nothing worse than file sharing going on if this is their priority.

      Exactly.

      Let's say they stamp out all movie piracy on the Internet, across the world (absurd, I know, but this is a thought experiement). You really think the people in power are just going to stop with that end result?

      If history has taught us one thing, is that power corrupts. And absolute power corrupts absolutely. As far as I'm concerned, allowing them to stamp out piracy would give them a green light into some mind-numbing Orwellian facade that they think they world should live in.

      Why, Yes. By that statement I am supporting copyright infringement. Hmm... Imagine that.

    13. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens all the time - they get bigger fish to fry. Once I was doing 90 in a 55, looked to my left to see a motorcycle cop with his radar gun pointed straight at me from behind a pillar. We were close enough that our eyes locked. Since I knew I was nailed, I went ahead and started pulling over. Then I watched in my rearview as he got on his bike, started pulling out, then abruptly did a U-turn and went the other way. Another time, about a year after I had moved across the country, I got pulled over by a cop that noticed my expired, out-of-state tags. as it happens, both my inspection sticker and my license were also out of state and expired, and I had no proof of insurance (I was actually insured though). I could tell the guy was in a hurry, so I responded to everything with glacial speed, until he finally just said, "You get those fixed!" and sped off. I'd say I was pretty lucky if it weren't for the numerous times I didn't get off so easily :)

    14. Re:Past Due! by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      Thats not really an anecdote. That happens all the time. I've had cops respond to a B&E alarm at my place and be on the way with the dogs and everything but then get a man hiding with a shotgun report and have to take off before they can do anything. For something like a B&E they know they can come back to it, but if they've got someone pulled over for a DUI they can't process him, they have to go, so he will get off with the crime.

      They specifically(at least here) receive instructions to let whoever it is go for anything non-life-threatening in order to respond to a situation that IS life threatening. Which makes perfect sense to me.

    15. Re:Past Due! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Nowhere does it say the policemen were armed (what for anyway).

      The power of the police comes from the threat of force. There are few nations where police are not typically armed, and even there the subtext is, "If you don't do what we want, we come back with guns."

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    16. Re:Past Due! by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the way slavery went out of style the moment it became more profitable to have consumer goods for sale to paid workers who could be controlled almost as well as slaves by debt.

      I don't think it was really more profitable (in absolute terms it was, but in relative terms, not so much), but it certainly was easier - once people had the illusion of freedom they became much more docile.

    17. Re:Past Due! by gman003 · · Score: 1

      That may be the most cynical thing I've read in months. I'm still debating exactly how true it is.

    18. Re:Past Due! by sweatyboatman · · Score: 0

      once people had the illusion of freedom they became much more docile

      This statement is so silly; I don't know where to begin. What the hell are you talking about?

      --
      It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    19. Re:Past Due! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Put words in other people's mouths much?

      No, but you can set your watch by the fact that that silly argumnet will be used. Yep, just down stream, that's exactly what someone lamely tried to do. Never fails.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    20. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And as we all know, it's impossible for law enforcement agencies to do more than one thing at a time. That's why they stop arresting drunk drivers whenever they hear about a case of domestic violence, or have to give up investigations of child trafficking or currency countfeiting whenever there's been a bank robbery across town."

      Sarcasm aside (on both sides), police do not have an infinite supply of officers. Every single officer they make look into a file sharer case is one officer who is not out on patrol deterring potential crime by their presence (in the base case), or someone who is unable to respond to an emergency in process (in the worst case).

    21. Re:Past Due! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The power of the police comes from the threat of force

      You say that like it's a bad thing. How should police deal with people who refuse to stop doing something illegal? Hold their breath until they turn blue? Use extremely stern language, and perhaps threaten to tell their parents? The option to ultimately make use of force (as in, physically stopping someone from doing something dangerous, or physically taking someone to jail if they won't stop stealing from people, etc), if necessary, isn't really an option at all. Otherwise all of us law abiding people and the police we hire would be entirely at the mercy of criminals who are willing to use force, and would gladly do so if there never any consequences.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    22. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope some day that you can be on the receiving end of a little bit of excessive force by the police. Because we all know they would *never* abuse their power, right? Nobody's ever been coerced into making a confession to something they didn't do, or denied an attorney, or beaten/tortured. And the police *always* get to the scene before a criminal can use their own force against innocent people, right? Screw you--I'd rather defend myself than wait for some underpaid civil servant to make my safety their priority.

      And ask yourself whether all that time and money these idiots put into busting file-sharers couldn't have been better spent pursuing more heinous criminals.

      Your logic is FAIL.

    23. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Truly. The only reason there have been police raids is because of the amount of imaginary money involved. Take away the excessive penalties/damages claimed by the MAFIAA and replace them with real numbers, and see whether the police give a shit then. $10 per film downloaded/shared, and $1 per song. May as well have the cops coordinate a bust on everyone who's jay-walked. These "crimes" do not in any way deserve the severely excessive punishments currently associated with them, and the laws involved were originally intended for ACTUAL pirates, ie, CD-stamping operations selling fake copies by the truckload.

      Get some damned perspective.

    24. Re:Past Due! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Now that governments across the globe are mobilizing armed men to eliminate file sharers, the world will be a perfect place. Certainly there is nothing worse than file sharing going on if this is their priority.

      Does the article state this is their "priority"?

    25. Re:Past Due! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Or are you mostly just pissed because it seems fewer people than you'd like agree with you about the positive aspects of institutions built around, and publicly celebrating the ripping off of creative people? I suppose this is where you say that authors, musicians, performers, film makers, photographers, actors and all the rest have no choice but to work for The Man, and thus you're doing them a favor by ripping them off, right?

      Untill fairly recently, creative types had no choice but to "work for the man", but computers and the internet have changed all that. The RIAA for one is at war with file sharing because they have radio and don't need P2P, while the indies only have P2P and MySpace and Facebook. The RIAA's war against file sharing isn't a war against piracy, it's a war against their new competetion, who is eating their lunch. P2P is indeed killing the established music industry by highlighting their competetion, who until recently was locked out.

      If you want to fight "the man", don't download "the man's" work. Download indie artists, who need the word of mouth publicity.

      You can "pirate" Cory Doctorow's books from his web site. He attributes his status as a best selling author to that fact. And in fact, had I not downloaded a Doctorow book I wouldn't have bought any of them since my local library dodn't have any at the time.

      It's easier to check a DVD or CD from the library and copy it than it is to download it. I imagine the MPAA/RIAA would love to get rid of libraries.

    26. Re:Past Due! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      So, your point is that law enforcement should never have the option to physically stop someone in the middle of a crime? Should not be able to physically restrain someone who is violent? Not be able to prevent a murderer from running away because that would require physically touching them? Is that your position? Say yes or no.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    27. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding was that slavery went out of "fashion." IE the cotton reaper made cotton so profitable the value of slaves sky rocketed, and production sky rocketed until cotton started going out of fashion for more silk, etc. Only at that point was the north willing to give up cheap plentiful slave cotton from the south, to push the social agenda of freeing slaves.

    28. Re:Past Due! by houghi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the proof that playing games IS dangerous and should be regulated.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    29. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's too long term. We need something that business can be like "Hey... Aids", and suddenly they're making 50% more profit per quarter.

      If it doesn't get the business instantaneous money, it'll be half-assed efforts at best, as a half-assed show of good PR.

    30. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on your newly found delusions of grandeur. That is easily the most paranoid, craziest thing I've found this year. May I recommend a psychologist?

    31. Re:Past Due! by westlake · · Score: 1

      I don't think any of them have really found a good way of making money off of file sharing since their ridiculously large "winnings" in court are more than many people see in their entire lifetimes and therefore probably never get paid.

      The big win in court encourages future settlements out of court.

      When your wife says "Settle!" you settle.

      She won't let you put next month's mortgage payment or you kids' college fund on the line because you were too cheap to buy your videos from Amazon or rent from Netflix.

      What interests governments is the $185 million dollar production budget of a feature film like The Dark Knight and the $500 million dollars it returns in domestic theatrical release alone.

    32. Re:Past Due! by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      If it doesn't get the business instantaneous money, it'll be half-assed efforts at best, as a half-assed show of good PR

      Just out of curiosity, what do you get out of lying about stuff like that? I mean, other than lefty sarcasm points?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    33. Re:Past Due! by Lordnerdzrool · · Score: 1

      How the heck is garbage like this modded up? Well, I suppose the posting is "interesting" in the sense that it is interesting that another human being actually believes stuff like this.

      Nearly every evil "capitalist" also happens to own or is part of another's charitable foundation of some kind that is actively fighting against AIDs, among the many other problems that plague society. I've heard plenty of weird socialist rants before on Slashdot but, Jesus Christ, you have taken it to a whole new level by suggesting they actually enjoy watching people die to AIDs. Your entire posting is horseshit.

    34. Re:Past Due! by hercubus · · Score: 1

      if the NGOs were effective you might have a point. i see NGOs more as a marketing opportunity, building goodwill, that sort of thing. effective, not so much

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    35. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got pulled over once after blowing through 2 stop signs in under 10 feet. I had been playing GTA for 4 days straight since my car was iced in, so wasn't used to stopping.

      You need to be punched in the face.

    36. Re:Past Due! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      I said nothing about whether it was good or bad.

      However, it is often overlooked that making something "illegal" means pointing guns at people who do it. If you asked a bunch of people "should the government point guns at people who smoke cannabis, have sex for money, or make unauthorized copies of music files?", I suspect that you'd get a different response than if you asked "should smoking cannabis, having sex for money, or making unauthorized copies of music files be criminal activities?" -- even though the later implies the former.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    37. Re:Past Due! by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      If a slave can't work, you've lost the money you spent to buy them
      If an employee can't work, you can fire their ass and hire someone new. (There was no workmans comp, disability benefits, etc, back then. And especially in America, there was a large underclass of people fresh off a boat and looking for work)

    38. Re:Past Due! by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      In my business, when I run into a customer who tells me he is Christian and how god is his partner, I automatically jack my prices 15% and require payment when services are rendered. Because I know the cocksucker will tip me off given a chance. I know that the few times I have been hired to work for people who claim and wear the Christianity as a badge, that I have been fucked. In short, give me a satanist as a customer before a christian.

    39. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said like a true bigot.

    40. Re:Past Due! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're off by an order of magnitude. Try millions.

    41. Re:Past Due! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      So, your point is that law enforcement should never have the option to physically stop someone in the middle of a crime? Should not be able to physically restrain someone who is violent?

      No one in this thread has made such a claim.

      My personal take is that LEOs have no more and no less right to use physical force to defend themselves or others, than any other citizen does.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    42. Re:Past Due! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      My personal take is that LEOs have no more and no less right to use physical force to defend themselves or others, than any other citizen does.

      Which body of law, in which country, are you referring to?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  7. Pirate Bay Up by ultranova · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Pirate Bay is up and works. It's slow, so either there's been some damage or it's slashdotted.

    Was that really too hard to check, Slashditors?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    1. Re:Pirate Bay Up by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      It's slow, so either there's been some damage or it's slashdotted. Was that really too hard to check, Slashditors?

      Clearly this was an ingenious plot by the MAFIAA to shut down pirate bay: with the slashdot effect!

      And guessing that Timothy's password was "password" was another brilliant move.

    2. Re:Pirate Bay Up by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      I see lots of posts saying its up, but it's down for me. No idea.

  8. Why by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't believe that filesharing is given such a high priority by governments in Europe. The entertainment industry must have a VERY strong lobbying organization to pull that off. It's a pity that rape victims and other sufferers from really bad crimes are not as well organized and don't have such deep pockets as the entertainment industry.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Why by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Big money controls all governments. And the entertainment industry is VERY big money.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Why by ewhenn · · Score: 1

      There's no money kickbacks generated to govt. cronies by solving rape crimes. Simple really.

    3. Re:Why by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't believe that filesharing is given such a high priority by governments in Europe.

            That is probably because said governments/law enforcement view filesharers as "soft" and "weak" and "easily intimidated", as opposed to anti-social criminals who won't change their ways even if you throw them in jail or beat them. Of course they haven't counted on crowd-sourcing (no matter how many sites they shut down it just keeps coming back) and crowd-mentality (there are so many people involved that everyone is sure they will never be "caught"). Really it's a futile effort unless they plan on arresting everyone in the world - and if they do THAT then what does it say about the law in the first place?

            Just the fact that TPB was ordered closed, the founders went to jail, and it's STILL up is a testament to how futile an effort this is. Continuing around this line will only increase file-sharing as more and more people realize how impossible it is to actually enforce these laws with any success. And government face the eventual backlash of voters when they rack up huge drains on their finite resources to go after file sharers instead of violent/dangerous criminals - with nothing to show for it in the end.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Why by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Night of the long bribes to restore moral turpitude to the networks of the EU.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Why by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well I think it's more the "in your face" factor. Don't slam me for invalid analogies here, but if rapists put up therapistbay.org and was sharing out vids of their rapes and was all like "you can't stop us, hahahahaha" attitude the police would react. They try taking down the arrogant ones to prove that nobody's untouchable and that they can in fact catch you. Piracy is probably the violation of the law I see happening the most openly, perhaps with the exception of speeding but it's a close call.

      By the way, very excited to see what the Pirate Party will make of this... it's election day the 19th in Sweden and I think they just got a much needed PR booster.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's a pity that rape victims and other sufferers from
      > really bad crimes are not as well organized and don't
      > have such deep pockets as the entertainment industry.

      Oh, but they are going after the rapists.

      http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/08/21/1138240/Julian-Assange-Faces-Rape-Investigation-In-Sweden-mdash-Updated

    7. Re:Why by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't believe that filesharing is given such a high priority by governments in Europe. The entertainment industry must have a VERY strong lobbying organization to pull that off. It's a pity that rape victims and other sufferers from really bad crimes are not as well organized and don't have such deep pockets as the entertainment industry.

      Look, I don't think you're giving them enough credit. They're also being very serious about wikileaks. It's not just the entertainment industry getting their balls fondled here.

      Incidentally, I love how the wikileaks thing just highlights the problem with the way the powerful handle their business. The problem isn't that bad things happened, the problem is that you found out about it! So reform efforts won't be directed towards preventing bad things from happening, just making sure we're more diligent about keeping them under wraps. "If not for them, you wouldn't even know about the military slaughtering innocent civilians! And would you even be so upset about fecal bacteria in your meat if nobody told you?" Stupid smoke detector keeps going off, pull the batteries. By the way, anyone else having trouble breathing? I wonder if there might somehow be a connection.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    8. Re:Why by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      When you have the deep pockets and lack of ethics that the entertainment industry possesses, you have all the right ingredients to take a minor civil offense and make it into a severe crime punishable by several years in jail. Just be glad that old people don't have those kinds of resources to send you to jail 5 years for walking on grass or wearing your pants too low.

    9. Re:Why by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      And some parts of the entertainment industry do not even pay to the artists, so they have even more money to create laws and have them enforced.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    10. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Piracy is probably the violation of the law I see happening the most openly

      That is what happens when the vast majority of the population does not believe in a law. It is one of these examples where a law has been bought with bribes against the will of the people.

      It's a good thing that such laws are openly and massively violated.

    11. Re:Why by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      [reading 'letters of apology' at an Amensty International gig]
      "This one is from the Shah of Persia (retired).
      What your organisation needs is a strong and charismatic figurehead. I won't make the same mistake I made last time; there's no point employing psychopathically cruel secret police who leave a lot of burnt and mangled bodies all over the place - one needs to employ psychopathically cruel secret police who leave no evidence at all!"

      --
      FGD 135
    12. Re:Why by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      There's no money kickbacks generated to govt. cronies by solving rape crimes. Simple really.

      Worse: instead they've got interest in making up rape crimes, thus watering down the credibility of real rape victims.

    13. Re:Why by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      but if rapists put up therapistbay.org and

      You mipselled wikileaks.org (which incidentally is hosted on the same ISP... o the irony...)

    14. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is probably because said governments/law enforcement view filesharers as "soft" and "weak" and "easily intimidated", as opposed to anti-social criminals who won't change their ways even if you throw them in jail or beat them. Of course they haven't counted on crowd-sourcing (no matter how many sites they shut down it just keeps coming back) and crowd-mentality (there are so many people involved that everyone is sure they will never be "caught"). Really it's a futile effort unless they plan on arresting everyone in the world - and if they do THAT then what does it say about the law in the first place?

      Boy, I'm sure glad "anti-social criminals who won't change their ways even if you throw them in jail or beat them" is such a better description for filesharers! Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go back to my parents' basement to check on my torrent farm after the MPAA filed their fifth lawsuit against me (I'll show those fuckers who's boss THIS time! Yeah! Fuck tha man down with the system etc etc)!

    15. Re:Why by arbiterxero · · Score: 0

      Isn't that exactly what happened to the War on Drugs? And yet we still waste MILLIONS on it? I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just that you can't stop it, you can barely make a dent in it and yet we throw HUGE resources at it, catch the occasional big-wig and ruin a lot of you people's lives over minumum sentences believeing that it will be a deterrent. It's not a deterrent, it won't work, and everyone knows it. 20 years on and we still haven't listened to the suggestions from professionals in the fields. How is this any different?

    16. Re:Why by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      I can't believe that filesharing is given such a high priority by governments in Europe. The entertainment industry must have a VERY strong lobbying organization to pull that off. It's a pity that rape victims and other sufferers from really bad crimes are not as well organized and don't have such deep pockets as the entertainment industry.

      One raid per year is high priority? How well does that rape argument work for you when you get pulled over for speeding, or get a parking ticket? Are those a waste of policemens time as well, and only there because of strong lobbying organizations?

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    17. Re:Why by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      There is no profit in tracking down rapists.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    18. Re:Why by arth1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      the founders went to jail,

      When did this happen?

      In civilized parts of the world, you aren't dragged off the court in handcuffs if sentenced to prison. Unless you're deemed an immediate danger to yourself or others, You are let go, and later they'll send you a letter stating when you can start serving. You usually get a fair amount of warning, so you can make necessary arrangements (like relocating children, renting out your house, informing your job so they can hire a temp, applying for a stay on loans and mortgages, et cetera).
      If you file an appeal (like is the case here), the judiciary normally won't even start the paperwork to get the prison authorities to schedule your sentence.

      For their fine, they similarly will get a letter from "kronofogden" (pecuniary enforcement authority) in due time, and if they're unable to pay, will have the opportunity to choose to live on minimum (welfare equivalent) income for five years, after which all records of debts are stricken. Going to gaol for not paying a fine was abolished in the 1950s, I believe.

    19. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, while I am firmly of the belief that filesharing is not a crime and the sooner governments figure this out and ignore the entertainment industry, the better, I want to point out that the generic argument 'hey, I cant believe they are spending time on crime x, there are far worse crimes out there!' is crap.

      One hears this sort of comment very regularly from people who receive some kind of traffic fine. Just because there are murders and rapes, doesn't mean no attention should be given to 'lesser' crimes. When someone steals your car or robs you at knifepoint, do you want to police to reply 'sorry, come back when there are no more murders and rapes' when you go and report it?

    20. Re:Why by prionic6 · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, I love how the wikileaks thing just highlights the problem with the way the powerful handle their business.

      The rich and powerful, they take what they want. We steal it back for you.

    21. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think nobody would go http://therapistbay.org to even discover it -- nobody likes therapists.

    22. Re:Why by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Which part of "AS OPPOSED TO" was so difficult to understand? You must be a reporter. Nay, a lawyer.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    23. Re:Why by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      And some parts of the entertainment industry do not even pay to the artists, so they have even more money to create laws and have them enforced.

      Well, they do say it takes money to make money.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    24. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can't believe that filesharing is given such a high priority by governments in Europe.

      Where on Earth did you pull this idea from? Most politicians in Europe would barely know what the pirate bay is about, most would probably think it was about the real pirate situation in and around Somalia.

      The entertainment industry must have a VERY strong lobbying organization to pull that off.

      I'm sure that they, sadly, have a strong lobby to influence politicians, but generally speaking (west) Europe have a good separation between politicians and the police and judges. Also note that this is apparently an operation that have in the works for two years in multiple countries, i.e. far beyond what a politician can reasonable be thought to have set in motion. This was the police doing a big operation in several countries, not some puny action to please the lobby arm of the entertaining industry.

      It's a pity that rape victims and other sufferers from really bad crimes are not as well organized and don't have such deep pockets as the entertainment industry.

      And that have shit all to do with the above police action, the police have different divisions dealing with different types of crime. The police isn't some monolith that can only focus on one thing at a time, as you seem to think.

    25. Re:Why by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Of course they haven't counted on crowd-sourcing (no matter how many sites they shut down it just keeps coming back)

      Thus it's the perfect ploy. A perpetually re-occurring issue much like recreational drug use. The governments get to claim they are "doing something" against some "great evil", because it is not viewed as a "evil" by a significant of the population it keeps occurring. So rather then fix the root of the problem (dissolve the entertainment cartels, decriminalise/regulate recreational drugs) they would rather be continually fighting it because that is easier then any real solution.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    26. Re:Why by master_p · · Score: 1

      Filesharing is the new underground resistance and disobedience movement. Governments do not want that. A powerful lobby is not really required.

  9. ermmm... check your connection.. by s0litaire · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pirate Bay has been fine for me for the past 12 hours!
    It WAS a bit slow around 4am today but it's been fine...

    But whoever wrote that story should check their grammar, the main sentence is ambiguous at best:
    was it:
    "The Pirate Bay is currently unavailable (For Comment)"
    or
    "The Pirate Bay (Website is down and) is currently unavailable"

    They sound similar but have totally different meanings

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:ermmm... check your connection.. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Still functioning for me here in Texas.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:ermmm... check your connection.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hasn't been functioning since last night here in Florida... wtf?!? can somebody private the direct IP that works? I've even flushed DNS, which provided a different IP and still nothing on the main site.

    3. Re:ermmm... check your connection.. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Try using 8.8.8.8 as your primary DNS http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/using.html

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:ermmm... check your connection.. by cawpin · · Score: 1

      Down for me here in AZ at 09:16 MST. I haven't had trouble connecting until now.

  10. Not pirate related by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They were just investigating all the torrent/Wikileaks mirrors on rape and molestation charges.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  11. Coordinated attack against Warez by rotide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The action, targeting the so-called 'Warez Scene', is said to have been in planning for two years, and is believed to have taken place at the request of Belgian authorities."

    Ya, good luck with that. In the meantime new servers will come online and all the bits will be put back in order. This time, they will probably be put up in countries that won't answer the phone. Good job, 2 years of planning and I'm sure a heroic police effort, executing the warrants, will be undone in a matter of weeks. Welcome to the digital age.

    1. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Weeks? These are torrent trackers; With DHT, centralised trackers are at best a convenience. Not having them will only add some legwork to those looking for files, it won't in any way stop access to them.

      The genie is out of the bottle, and they're making copies for everyone to enjoy.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this up

    3. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by JxcelDolghmQ · · Score: 0

      2 years of planning... 2 minutes of downtime. Very effective, wasn't it?

      You. Will. Never. Stop. Piracy.

      In fact, good luck trying to even make a dent in it. These companies and trade organizations are going to spend more money paying off politicians and trying to combat the "problem" than they're actually losing due to piracy.

      Fuck 'em is what I say.

      The RIAA, MPAA, ASCAP, CRIA, SPA, etc can all collectively eat my taint.

    4. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      at the request of Belgian authorities

      at the request of who? Last I checked, Belgium didn't even have a government!

    5. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      at the request of who? Last I checked, Belgium didn't even have a government!

      I guess it has been about 2 years since we've had a stable government and that's also about the time it takes for a request to get processed by the bureaucrats here in my experience.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    6. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legal pandering by sycophant toadies and tame AG's will not do the 'trick'
      They know full well these sites are NOT HOSTING material, so big big problem there.

      Hash Tables are not covered by the Berne convention. Sweden's legal system is tarnished again.
      Sadly for Sweden, the servers will migrate elsewhere, while lawyers will pick apart the warrants for willful illegality - this is raid number what?

      In future I suggest such servers be 'insured' against wrongful search/seizure/other , so that fat juicy compensation payments can come out of the local AG's budgets. This is harassment.

      I also hope there is a big fat file of pseudo random numbers called 'Insurance' that wastes vast amounts of cpu cycles on complete garbage for the red herring award. Disinformation can be a two way street.

    7. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by koreaman · · Score: 2

      My kingdom for a mod point...

    8. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, tell them to call me when they take down google. filetype:torrent is all the centralized tracker I need.

    9. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man is completely right, I work in a datacentre in the Netherlands which was "raided" too, they took some hacked server which contained warez all on a european coordinated attack demanded by Belgium, government or not, the BAF party has more power than a private company should have.

    10. Re:Coordinated attack against Warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, you get modded up and the parent (which is funny btw) languishes due to an obviously brain damaged mod

  12. In UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was down first try. fine 2nd time around... Seems a bit skitish

  13. This Would Have Happened Earlier... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...had the EU produced Entertainment Industry content of their own worth pirating. But it was predominantly "Yankee Corporatist" wallets which stood to suffer, so high on European law enforcement agendas it was not. Hey, I love Dr. Who as much as the next guy, but I'm just saying the way it is...

    1. Re:This Would Have Happened Earlier... by synapse1712 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_selling_music_artists

      Movies are rather different, of course.

    2. Re:This Would Have Happened Earlier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...had the EU produced Entertainment Industry content of their own worth pirating. But it was predominantly "Yankee Corporatist" wallets which stood to suffer, so high on European law enforcement agendas it was not. Hey, I love Dr. Who as much as the next guy, but I'm just saying the way it is...

      You must never have visited The Pirate Bay. The largest number of torrents is porn, much of it produced within EU (or at least Europe: a lot of German, Russian, Polish and Serbian amateur movies, you know how exhibitionistic those people are). Hollywood movies probably is somewhere on the Top 10 list of number of torrents. But my guess is that pre-80's Swedish music and old Swedish TV shows also are in the Top 10 (because a lot of Swedes put torrents on TPB).

      If you only look at the Top 100 downloaded, then you mostly see US made crap . That's because everybody in USA (with its huge population that has nothing better to do then passively consume entertainment), EU and most people in the rest of the world, understand English. There are a lot of regional stuff, that you can't even buy/get anywhere else then TPB, with smaller audiences (less spread languages). Personally I would be happy if all the Hollywood crap disappeared, you can get that from other torrent sites, or even from the official distributors, the other stuff don't exist on other torrent sites, is hard to get anywhere else and impossible to discover if you don't allready know about it.

  14. Not about TPB by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These raids were apparently not about TPB or other torrent sites but rather aimed at scene topsites.

    I've read some media industry "information" about the scene lately where they've compared it to organized crime (in the "making money from illegal activities" sense, not the "being organized" sense). Of course, approx 99% of those involved in the scene don't make money from their involvement but I guess it's a bit harder to make them out to be evil mafioso types if they're not actually making any money...

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    1. Re:Not about TPB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this is the UK Music Industry Calls For Truce With Technology way of redefining the word "truce"?

  15. In Oz by youdaman · · Score: 1

    just tried http://thepiratebay.org/ -- was down the first few times I tried, then up again... noticed some other posts saying the same...

  16. hey, close down craigslist by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    poof!: prostitution will disappear

    close down pirate bay... poof!: piracy disappears

    right, right?

    regardless of your stand on media piracy or prostitution, simply from a law enforcement point of view that assumes these "vices" are simply something illegal to be fought: i don't understand why you want to shut the hubs down

    its not like shutting down craigslist or pirate bay is going to make piracy or prostitution go away. instead, you allow craigslist and pirate bay to continue, and you do your law enforcement job, and monitor the hubs. like shooting fish in a barrel: just respond to what's there. but without craigslist or the pirate bay, these "problems" are harder to catch and monitor

    its almost as if law enforcement wants to drive these problems back underground again so they don't have to deal with them. out of sight, out of mind

    which shows you the ambivalency with which modern society views stuff like piracy or prostitution: they are on the cusp of acceptability. its not like murder or rape, where the illegality of the actions are obvious and therefore the mandate and willpower to punish perps is 100%. instead, with stuff like prostitution and piracy, the willpower wanes, the commitment lapses, because the immorality of the actions is not clearcut

    such that the law enforcement campaigns consist less of going after perpetrators, but just making them go underground and disappear from prominent view

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hey, close down craigslist by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      it's weird how easily you can say "piracy" and mean "copyright infringement", when you use words like murder or rape in the same phrase. It just goes to show that rather than the copyright owners succeeding in making the sharers look bad, the meaning of the word "pirate" changed.

      --
      new sig
    2. Re:hey, close down craigslist by Kjella · · Score: 1

      its not like shutting down craigslist or pirate bay is going to make piracy or prostitution go away. instead, you allow craigslist and pirate bay to continue, and you do your law enforcement job, and monitor the hubs. like shooting fish in a barrel: just respond to what's there. (...) its almost as if law enforcement wants to drive these problems back underground again so they don't have to deal with them. out of sight, out of mind

      I think you have the cause and effect mixed up. People are willing to share on TPB because because the police can't even hit fish in a barrel, the barrel is so big, the fish too many and the bullets too precious to waste on it. It's not just to start mass issuing tickets by IP, I'm sure you know all the issues with that and they'd clog up both the police and the courts if they tried. It's not a tactic to win, it's a tactic to say we haven't completely given up trying to enforce the law.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:hey, close down craigslist by timbo234 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      which shows you the ambivalency with which modern society views stuff like piracy or prostitution: they are on the cusp of acceptability.

      More than on the cusp, in Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland and some states of Australia for example, prostitution is a legal, regulated industry.

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
    4. Re:hey, close down craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to be of the opinion that certain things, deemed bad for a society, should be prohibited outright - pot, LSD, crack, etc.

      Now, I'm not quite so sure. The drug wars have done nothing to decrease drug trade and consumption, and have seemingly only attributed to the growth of drug cartels, government agencies, and government spending - not to mention the increased number of laws surrounding it all. The 'addicted' percentage of society has remained largely the same. People will go to obscene places to get their fix (huffing, jenkem, etc.). It's to the point where the drug trade alone has the strength to topple governments in South America; that isn't good.

      Personally, I've never tried anything more illicit than pot; I'm a tobacco and whiskey kinda guy, and I don't even like pot. So I haven't a vested interest in these things. I'm not at the point where I think illicit drugs should be free to grow and trade - they should be regulated, most certainly - but what's being done now is certainly not working.

      Illegal file sharing, however, doesn't seem to fit the same categorization as drugs. You could say that big pharma is to the drug trade as Microsoft is to software piracy (as seems to be a prevailing analogy), but I don't know if that holds up. A closer analogy would be black market duplicate goods, which seem to stand on an entirely different moral ground, because then IP laws get brought into the game.

      Yes, IP law is fucked up, too, but there's still a great deal of convincing that needs to be done before I'm comfortable accepting the whole system is fucked. IP is what has allowed us, in no small part, to allow the West to grow to be as affluent as it is. I'm not quite ready to throw the baby out with the bath water.

      Is there a legitimate, moral justification for torrenting games, software, and music I'm not aware of?

    5. Re:hey, close down craigslist by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Your hooker analogy would be more apt if there weren't a thousand hookers NOT on Craigslist for every one that is. Hell, the bar I like isn't in a better part of town, I can't walk home from there without half a dozen hookers propositioning me. Craigslist will just get you a very expesive hooker.

      Funny, I don't see anybody selling dope on Craigslist, yet the drug trade is still worth billions.

      its almost as if law enforcement wants to drive these problems back underground again so they don't have to deal with them. out of sight, out of mind

      Bingo!

      its not like murder or rape

      Murder and rape have victims. Dope, prostitution, and noncommercial piracy don't.

    6. Re:hey, close down craigslist by dcam · · Score: 1

      Murder and rape have victims. Dope, prostitution, and noncommercial piracy don't.

      Prostitution is tightly tied to people trafficing. Not all prostitutes have a choice about their line of work (and I am not talking about a financial choice).

      --
      meh
    7. Re:hey, close down craigslist by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Prostitution is tightly tied to people trafficing.

      So are a lot of other professions. Like sweatshops, for instance. If your hooker has been forced into prostitution, the fault is the human trafficer, not yours, any more than buying a sweater produced by slave labor is your bad; it's the fault of the person who forced the person into the sweatshop.

  17. Either that, by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    ... or the world is an awful place where governments world-wide don't care for anything important.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Either that, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politicians always had a different definition of "important". To them it's only important if it directly results in more money or power for them. Issues are only important if the relevant lobby group pays enough bribes.

  18. Good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That the police are enforcers for corporate overmasters rather then the people....

  19. Berne Agreement by Defenestrar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Simultaneous raids are also said to have been carried out in The Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Germany, Great Britain, the Czech Republic and Hungary."

    Sweden (1904), Netherlands (1912), Belgium (1887), Norway (1896), Germany (1887), Great Britain (1887), Czech Republic (1993), and Hungary (1904) have all signed the Berne Convention among other agreements.

    Sweden may have fairly loose laws when it comes to "sharing" protected work, but it also has international obligations that may seem more burdensome now than they did back in 1904.

    I wonder if ACTA will have similar unforeseen consequences in one hundred years as today's act of file transmission and duplication was likely not considered back in the day of ink and presses.

    1. Re:Berne Agreement by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "fairly lose laws" or perhaps "fairly looose" laws.

      We don't want to loose the correct usage.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  20. God !!! So Piraets are all RAPISTS now ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That leaks guy gives us all a bad name !!

    True, many pirates are criminals (rapists, swindlers, drug addicts, and of course microsoft employees) but we aren't all bad. Not that bad. Not really bad, anyway.

    1. Re:God !!! So Piraets are all RAPISTS now ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - but the rape charges will be dropped by morning when molestations charges will then be investigated instead because TPB refused to wear virus transmission protection.

  21. Progress must cost money! It's elementary. by captainpanic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you see that "Economic Growth" must be expressed in money, and that if people don't pay for it, but still consume it, it's not "growth", for the simple reason that we cannot measure it?

    I mean... duh.

    That's like curing cancer for free, and not getting rich of it. That's not growth, and therefore not progress... If you aim to improve this world without earning money, you clearly have your priorities wrong.

    Police and governments exist to maximize measurable profit.

    1. Re:Progress must cost money! It's elementary. by Anubeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That's like curing cancer for free, and not getting rich of it. That's not growth, and therefore not progress..."

      I suspect Dr. Jonas E. Salk, the inventor of the first polio vaccine, would beg to differ, as indeed would millions of people alive today who would have either perished in polio epidemics and/or lived out the rest of their 'lives' confined to an iron lung. Honestly the capitalist love affair with shiny metal coins and wrinkly pieces of green paper makes you all out to be a collective of witless morons, as does the mantra of perpetual economic growth within a finite resource pool. Progress is not measured purely in monetary terms, despite propaganda of free-marketeers, it is measured in the quality and dignity of life of a societies citizenry AS A WHOLE.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." -- Leonardo Da Vinci
    2. Re:Progress must cost money! It's elementary. by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      *sigh*
      We're all doomed when even /. doesn't understand sarcasm anymore. I thought I overdid it - but my post has been modded down, and I have a nice serious reply here too (a post which is right on the money, pun intended).

      I guess that my example of a free cure for cancer (who could be against that??) wasn't silly enough. And I apologise for not explaining the joke at the end of the post...

      Ok, then, if there would be a method to make everyone infinitely happy, and that would make the world perfect in every way, but you cannot make money by this method - then that method is not Economic Growth, at least, not according to our definition of Economic Growth...
      Does that example show the stupidity of our everlasting need for economic growth enough? Because exactly the fact that we demand of every development in life that it has a measurable profit (expressed in money) prevents us from making some enormous leaps forward.

      And it's exactly that kind of thinking within governments that now raises a large police force to take down these servers across Europe.

    3. Re:Progress must cost money! It's elementary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Um... yeah, "duh" is exactly right. "Economic Growth" must be expressed in money, because economics concerns scarcity and any scarce resource can be exchanged for, and therefore expressed in, money. You wanna talk about copies of existing data, which are trivially expandable and thus not scarce and so not worth money? Go right ahead, but don't pretend it's "Economic Growth", find (or invent, if needed) a term that describes what you're talking about.

      Now as for considering the spread of information, or a non-profitable cure, "not progress", yeah, that would be an issue worthy of your sarcasm, but then I don't think anyone's doing that.

      If you'll set aside your preconceptions about capitalism and look a bit closer, you might realize that "progress" is something people talk about, but nobody (or at least nobody of consequence) has "progress" as a direct goal.

      A worker's goal is to avoid getting fired, or if he's ambitious, to get a raise. So he works hard, or is stealthily about his slacking, or maybe even undercuts a coworker so they'll be laid off first.
      A manager's goal is to get that promotion, or to get a bigger slice of budget. So he'll try to maximize his division's profit, not necessarily the company's.
      Note that these goals have one thing in common, and it's not precisely that they look for money -- they're seeking personal power, which at low levels does correlate well with money.

      Now consider a politician -- once again, his goal is personal power, but he's in a position of delegated power on behalf of the people. The fraction of this power he uses personally, rather than according to the public interest, goes towards his goal, but so does getting re-elected or elected to a higher office, so the amount of personal power he derives is fairly limited (exception: lame-ducks have this rather alleviated). Ultimately, he needs to keep the public content, while maximize government power (and thus the portion of it he can wield), and economic growth supports both, the latter through increased taxes. Then there's usually a fight for status & power within his political party, too.

      Take capitalism out of the picture, though, and you'll find you don't get a socialist utopia -- you get the same politicians at the top seeking the same personal power, they just use non-monetary tools to achieve it. And it turns out to suck at least as hard, but generally worse, because at least profit does drive efficiency under some not-ridiculously-wrong modeling assumptions (profiting by buying unfair legislation is the worst deviation, by far), but there's generally no such beneficial tendencies at all of the power struggle in socialist systems.

    4. Re:Progress must cost money! It's elementary. by Anubeon · · Score: 1

      Blast! I was thinking mere seconds before I hit submit 'now is this fellow being sarcastic?' but I decided not and posted my response. We need a more robust set of punctuation marks so that things like irony and sarcasm don't go undetected as in this case; and as if to drum the above point home, some tit is already trying to peddle a proprietary 'sarcmark' and make money off of it. Welcome to capitalism, where someone can draw a squiggle on a piece of paper, register it as a trademark and live of the proceeds for life.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." -- Leonardo Da Vinci
    5. Re:Progress must cost money! It's elementary. by captainpanic · · Score: 0

      The point I try to make is that something that does not make money is being prevented in favor of a similar system that actually does make money, but is highly unpopular, and run by the mafia.

      It has little to do with capitalism or socialism. It has to do with plain stupidity in our economic system which would still be there is we changed our economics to a more socialist situation.

      In case you didn't know, at least in Europe it's against the law to have a cartel (an organization of firms that agrees to fix prizes of products). But a song still costs about 1 euro, the same as 10 years ago, despite the fact that we can now download it, and copy it, at a whim, on a processor at home! We no longer have to buy an expensive vinyl disk which was produced and then transported across half the world. Why are these record companies being protected by the lawmakers rather than being prosecuted for forming a cartel?

      A copy of a song simply isn't worth 1 euro anymore. It's nearly for free. But our politicians, who are the slaves of economic growth, cannot accept that. They are scared to change anything, because if copyright laws change, at first, there will be less money going around (=automatically bad). The fact that the general population don't care, and just happily copy music... and the fact that most bands will still make enough money from (live) concerts... and the fact that 99% of the musicians don't earn money with their music anyway... that's all irrelevant to our lawmakers.

      Changing copyright laws may actually be progress - but not if your only measure of progress is expressed in money.

    6. Re:Progress must cost money! It's elementary. by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      I think the prevailing assumption is that population is always increasing, which is why the GDP should also be increasing.

      We also see inflation over time, which means that the ratio of money to people is always increasing.

  22. TPB is down for me by CoffeeDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been trying to get on Pirate Bay this morning and most times my connection either times out or I get an error page about connecting to a caching server and only after mashing the reload button many times do I actually get a page.

    Then again this could just be the effect of everyone reading news stories about it being down and trying to "test" if the site is up, thus overloading and taking down the server for real. Hooray for self-fulfilling prophecy!

  23. To clear things up- by w00tsauce · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. TPB is not down, it is and has been up-just really really slow. TPB being slow is nothing new, it's been plagued with speed and reliability problems the entire summer. 2. TPB trackers were shut down a long time ago willfully. They still show up all over the place though because nobodys really around anymore to maintain the website except a couple volunteer moderators with limited access. Most torrents that were tracked on TPB's tracker are now tracked on openbt/publicbt. It's common practice for people to point dns of tracker.thepiratebay.org to tracker.openbittorrent.com. 3. Swedish news outlets have already confirmed WikiLeaks was not the target of these raids. It's just a coincidence that them and many other controversial websites are hosted at prq/rix-mainly because of their dedication to anonymity of the customer. 4. Their goal (my guess/opinion) was to take down a bunch of "scene" servers and websites simultaneously to temporarily stem the flow of high quality releases. Release groups and Pre sites/Scene sites often use servers to coordinate their efforts and post their releases to these places first-After which you have a trickle down effect where the torrents are posted to public torrent sites most of us are familiar with. I guess they're hoping that there will be enough evidence on these computers to identify some of the individuals who are at the top of the "scene" foodchain-the people who actually sneak the camcorders into the theaters or work at the cd pressing factory to prerelease a new CD etc...

    1. Re:To clear things up- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one don't believe in coincidences... Like having the biggest environmental disaster of the decade happen on Earth Day. You don't always hit your targets so sometimes you use a shotgun.

  24. Something Freenet-like this way comes? by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I tend to wonder when the pressure on normal people to get in line and shut up will go over the top and cause real action.

    It's not just file-sharers. Anyone who simply wants to be left alone as they travel the net is subject to monitoring and, maybe, serious trouble.

    How many meritless lawsuits will have to be filed, how many knocks on doors in the night must happen, before some package of technology comes into general use, a group of tools that creates a situation where ISPs see nothing but encrypted streams going this way and that, with no idea what's actually in them?

    All the pieces exist. Some years ago, I would have predicted that we'd be to that point already.

    But no. People just keep sending in the clear, writing all their important letters on the back of postcards unless the recipient forces them to put it in an envelope.

    Is this weird? Or is my viewpoint skewed? I'd really like to know because I sure don't understand it.

    1. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by Defenestrar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Encryption means you have something to hide. Probably a description of what nasty thing you saw in the woodshed.

    2. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the ISP be able to use a man-in-the-middle attack, if they're already monitoring everything?

    3. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to wonder when the pressure on normal people to get in line and shut up will go over the top and cause real action.

      Never. That's right. Normal people just shut up and get in line.

      Abnormal people on the other hand... they'll do some serious shit if pushed hard enough.

    4. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by Defenestrar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Flamebait?

      A little culture and reading would have illuminated the irony and kept me from being piqued enough to overuse italics.

      Meh - you can't mod them all.

    5. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes encryption could make you glow very bright. Could the Narus like units spot this traffic? Trace back for an entry and exit point down at a real IP level?
      They cannot read the message but they have the real sender and anyone interested. From that you have a location and some real world paper work.
      The "group of tools" that entered the US and UK/NATO hardware sector during the cold war where totally known to the NSA/GCHQ.
      Care with any 'free' gifts that just work :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by Wocka_Wocka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't think the villagers in The Village even had access to a computer. Nice try though.

    7. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by VShael · · Score: 1

      I think it's like the "Year of the Desktop" argument.

      You say that the tools are already there, but like many Linux advocates also do, you seem to underestimate the laziness of the average computer user who doesn't want to think. They only want to be entertained.

      The tools you talk about will have to be integrated in such a way as to be invisible to the average AOL user, and work without his knowledge or participation. Then and only then, will the postcard model of unencrypted data streams be obsolete.

    8. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by shentino · · Score: 1

      Imagine if you sent a readout of /dev/urandom and the feds thought it was encrypted?

    9. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      Flamebait?

      A little culture and reading would have illuminated the irony and kept me from being piqued enough to overuse italics.

      Meh - you can't mod them all.

      You were probably modded flamebait because your comment implies only bad people have something to hide, and that you're maybe a criminal if you want your data encrypted. I.e. the cop that asks to look around your house, and when you say no, they say "well what do you have to hide?". That won't go well with the slashdot crowd. Also, if your reference is obscure you should probably include a link in the original post.

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    10. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by Danathar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Freenet could be a piratebay replacement distribution method. A browser plugin to allow it would be ideal. The speed issue is not NEARLY as bad as it used to be. Freenet has made slow but steady progress over the years. Is it as fast as typical web browsing? Of course not, but speeds around a megabit or more are not uncommon. If it was a big turn off before because of speed I'd recommend trying it again. Content is still sparse, but the system DOES work.

    11. Re:Something Freenet-like this way comes? by FreenetFan · · Score: 1

      Freenet makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to identify the real sender of a message, even if you have a complete overview of all traffic on the network.

      In other words, it has anonymity as well as privacy.

  25. Tor/Freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fight the pigs! Install Tor Relays and Freenet nodes on as many computers as you can.

    torproject.org and freenetproject.org

  26. Oblig by RivenAleem · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated

  27. hobbyists women children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take them all in for re-programming/fear training. never mind the pornverts, as they make up their own 'content'?

  28. 1934 all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No bullets yet, but draconian repression of the underprivileged by the rich and powerful is an evil that was never really abolished, fanciful patriotic musings notwithstanding. Too bad so many people forget the lessons of history.

    1. Re:1934 all over again by Shompol · · Score: 1
      And the history lesson is summed up as follows:

      The crushing of the strike imparted a clear enough lesson: keep your head down.

  29. Report from Sweden by ospirata · · Score: 1

    The website is down for me as well. I am at the KTH network by now. On the other side, I don't see anyone talking about police raids at Stockholm.

  30. Wikileaks by golden+age+villain · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems that the Swedish provider also plays host to Wikileaks. How timely!

    1. Re:Wikileaks by davaguco · · Score: 0

      Nothing to see here, move along.

      --
      Please google and research "peak oil" a bit. You will discover this crisis is a lot worse than they have told you
  31. Symbiotic relationship by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a Symbiotic relationship. The Entertainment Industry (not artists, btw) and the governments need each other.

    The industry distract the people from what the governments are doing (hint: pilfer)

    So when the industry come knocking about competition to their eternal monopoly, the governments jump to help. You wouldn't want your smoke screen to clear up and have light shining on you...

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:Symbiotic relationship by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Good old "bread and circus". Or in these days, "tv dinners and reality shows".

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  32. MAFFIA's new plan by homes32 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1. Stage police "raids" or simple questioning.
    2. Submit slashdot story.
    3. Sit back and watch the slashdot effect as TPB's own users overload the site and take it down.
    4 ?????
    5. PROFIT!

  33. They are easy fish by elsurexiste · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you got almost all the truth. The key here is evidence: to prosecute a user for sharing copyrighted work is just a matter of finding evidence that a file was downloaded to X and that X was linked to you. Log files make this trivial. To convict someone accused of rape or pedophilia is much more difficult: evidence can be unreliable or murky, a lot is based on people's testimony and you don't always have DNA aka smoking gun. It's not that they don't go after them (they do), is that it's just too damn hard and it doesn't get a lot of publicity (understandably).

    --
    I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  34. great news by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 1

    since european police can assign such vast resources to chasing file sharing kids it must mean serious crime in europe is all but eliminated.

  35. Police raids at Slashdot? by ospirata · · Score: 1

    Kugrian's comment led me to thing that these news about Pirate Bay shutdown are quiet suspicious. It's seem like an joint action from DMCA and polices from Europe to spead a rumor, create paranoia and take TPB off by DoS.

  36. No Priority by andersh · · Score: 1, Informative

    Bah, the industry owns the US government, you rarely hear about cases where people are sued for downloading here in Europe.

    One raid gives you the impression that it's somehow a high priority? We don't even have a DMCA! File sharing is a legal right in some European countries, others have various approaches.

    The many different European governments are rarely subject to the US kind of lobbying. Each country has it's own government and lobby, they don't have the same strength and resources as the RIAA/MPAA.

    Oh, and there is no entertainment industry of similar importance and strength as Hollywood here. There is no reason for our governments to prioritize that industry. It does exist in the US however, doesn't it?

    The European Parliament [of the EU] is at least clearly against the American ACTA plans! Your Congress and Senate is filled to the brim with lobbyists and the people who answer to them.

    People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

  37. Ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya, good luck with that.

    Do you actually use the word "ya" in face-to-face conversation or is it just for posting online?

    1. Re:Ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually try to troll people in face-to-face conversation or is it just for posting online?

  38. insults are coopted by people who are smeared by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    my use of the word "pirate" is with full knowledge of the discrepancy you refer to

    we are after all talking about the PIRATE bay. we both know the guys who run that site know full well that the traditional meaning of piracy is a poor descriptor of what copyright infringement is, but they wear the epithet "pirate" with pride on the name of their site. when someone smears and insults you, a good tactic is to take that insult or epithet, and use it yourself with pride as a descriptor. therefore nullifying the supposed power of the negative word. a negative becomes a positive. so i proudly call myself a pirate, when i know the sharing media is nothing like swashbucklers and theft. in this way, words are always constantly shifting in meaning and implication in popular culture, and this eventually filters down to dictionary terminology years later

    the same can be found in the gay rights movement: "queer" is now a word of pride. or even right here on slashdot: "nerd" and "geek" are words which were meant as insults but are now marks of honor. there are many sociological and political arenas where insults menat to smear, scapegoat, and prejudice are turned around and used as marks of pride

    for example, lately i am trying to proudly refer to myself as a socialist, here in the usa. socialism in europe is just obvious common sense. but in the usa it takes on mythic ridiculous proportions of evil, by people who barely understand the concept (ever hear of library? a highway system? social security? hellooooo?). such that using the word, as a mark of pride and a self-descriptor, is almost revolutionary and controversial, here in the usa at least, when of course, according to a strict interpretation of the meaning of the word, its completely humdrum

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:insults are coopted by people who are smeared by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      "for example, lately i am trying to proudly refer to myself as a socialist, here in the usa. socialism in europe is just obvious common sense."

      Sorry, which part of Europe is that.

    2. Re:insults are coopted by people who are smeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for example, lately i am trying to proudly refer to myself as a socialist, here in the usa. socialism in europe is just obvious common sense.

      Bull! Socialism is not considered common sense in Europe. The media may think that it is common sense, but not the people in general.

      There is a large percentage of people in Europe that are socalists but they are around 10 percents.

    3. Re:insults are coopted by people who are smeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. You truly are a leader among men. We in America should form a new party based on this socialist agenda! (No, the current Democrats don't count. Shut up.) What do we call it? Since we're reclaiming words, we should using an existing party name.....

      Oh, I've got it! We could be the Nazi party! Noone would see that coming.

    4. Re:insults are coopted by people who are smeared by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      even right here on slashdot: "nerd" and "geek" are words which were meant as insults but are now marks of honor.

      That one's a little different. We're not looked down on any more, and "nerd" as a word of pride happpened AFTER we became socially acceptable, not before.

    5. Re:insults are coopted by people who are smeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lately i am trying to proudly refer to myself as a socialist, here in the usa. socialism in europe is just obvious common sense. but in the usa it takes on mythic ridiculous proportions of evil

      Being opposed to socialism is neither ridiculous nor mythic. What is ridiculous - to a near mythic extent - is that the socialist elements will not 'out' themselves however clearly they are present. Now, they may not want 100% socialism as you may not wish either. However, there is a large contingent that wants socialized medicine yet refuses to call it such. IMO, the ridicule is on the deniers' side where it belongs. A different - yet not mainstream - side wants the AMA, FDA, DEA, patents etc. to get out of the picture. Few are on that side but I don't lie about it.

  39. The ISP is not called "ISP" by Pikewake · · Score: 1

    Perhaps just a strange choice of words, but you could get the impression that one of the raided providers is called "ISP". The only named provider I have heard mentioned is PRQ, who also hosts Wikileaks.

  40. I2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check it out. I2P offers anonymous network on top of TCP/IP, and by default the installation includes an anonymous bittorrent client: I2PSnark, which is made to avoid leaking information through the application layers like: IP, usernames, network-information, etc.

    I2P is encrypted end-to-end, and nothing escapes the network to the open internet, unless you route through one of the outproxies (which are generally frowned upon in the community).

    You can even use I2P as a VPN, which can connect two firewalled machines with no inbound connections, albeit slowly, it works and is like a distributed Hamachi working through encrypted tunnels of your choice. In theory, any application can now be tunnelled in encrypted and distributed fashion over the old internet, although for P2P you should be sure to avoid client applications which leak information. For personal use, anything can be tunnelled and reached, *anywhere*, as long as you got outbound connections.

    Using non-anonymous bittorrent in this current climate is irresponsible, as it is very easy for *anyone* to collect IP addresses. With I2P they know your IP, but not what you're doing, who you're connecting with etc. Nothing more than that you are connected through I2P..

    Heck, EVEN your peers in bittorrent won't get to know your IP, since it's all garlic-routed through the IP-network, so both sides remain anonymous. Now that's genious!

    I2P scales and behaves MUCH MUCH better than Freenet to boost.

    1. Re:I2P by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Someone mod AC up a bit - I2P is the most anonymous client around, that I'm aware of. Don't get carried away with the mods though - I2P is one of the SLOWEST ways to share files in existence. If you've ever used Freenet and/or Tor for file sharing, I2P is better, but not much. Of course, like any other client, more users could increase the speed.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:I2P by m50d · · Score: 1

      How does it compare to Gnunet? That's unique among anonymous/encrypted filesharing clients I've tried in that it's actually usable for decent-speed downloads.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:I2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always have this (baseless?) personal fear about potentially routing someone's illegal porn through such networks and that it will somehow come back to bite me even if I'm doing nothing wrong.

    4. Re:I2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use I2P along with Freenet and Tor. Freenet is probably the most secure - but doesn't allow access to the outside Internet.

    5. Re:I2P by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To be honest - I can't say. I've looked at Gnunet's home page, but haven't installed it, or tested it in any way. I'll be even more honest - I'm still learning how to make all the others work properly. I mean - it's one thing to install it, and visit a couple of flog pages, it's another thing entirely to actually navigate the darkweb, find what you're interested in, all the while avoiding the CP freaks, and make something of your experience. I WILL be downloading and installing Gnunet into a VM soon - but how soon, it's hard to say. Maybe a month, maybe 6 months, but I'll get around to it!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:I2P by luciferxe · · Score: 1

      it would be better if it was not owned and run by the FBI and CIA.

      kinda defeats the purpose of it now doesnt it?

    7. Re:I2P by FreenetFan · · Score: 1

      I've used both I2P and Freenet, and I've found Freenet to be the best in terms of speed, useful content, and community. There is certainly a constant flow of new music, movies and TV shows on there.

      I may give I2P another try though, to see how it has progressed.

    8. Re:I2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I2P is also Pedo central. While valuing the anonymity I have a a strong moral objection to using it...

  41. dont do that by cattrain · · Score: 1

    Don't scare me like that. TPB is up and running.

  42. Why governments act against their interest? by Peeteriz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the world, USA is the only one net 'exporter' of audiovisual copyrights. That means that for any of the European governments, anyone who buys movies or music from USA just creates some trade deficit and harms the local economy - sure, there are treaties starting from Berne convention where they have agreed that they should protect copyrights, but keeping a practical mind in this economy means that it is in the country's best interests just to do the bare minimum instead of being effective.

    Each teenager who downloads a Justin Bieber song instead of buying it means $1 gain for his country and $1 loss for USA, where the record studio execs would be spending their profits.

    1. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by Valacosa · · Score: 1

      Justin Bieber is Canadian, dude. You might want to pick a more American example.

      --
      "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    2. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if they didn't respect trade laws the US can exert far more leverage then they can. Oh so you don't want to pay for our Music. Fine we won't sell you replacement parts for your aircraft anymore. While everyone pans the US for having no export goods that really only applies to consumer goods. The fact is the US is a massive beast when it comes to capital goods.... you know those important things you can't really live without? Turbines, semiconductors, engines, medicine, telecommunications, ect.
      The US imports shit we want; but we export shit you need. The US is not the country you want to get into a trade war with; you will lose.

    3. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by krischik · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the USA has a history of invading or threatening to invade countries which do not follow their idea of free and fair trade. I wanted to quote the Wikipedia Article on “Convention of Kanagawa” - but the english version is missing the part that Japan was forced into the treaty. Unlike the German version which clearly states “um die Öffnung der japanischen Häfen Shimoda und Hakodate für den Handel mit den USA zu erzwingen”.

    4. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      In the world, USA is the only one net 'exporter' of audiovisual copyrights

      Sony is a Japanese company. Universal is iinm French. But in actuality there are no "American" content exporters (it's the content that is sold, not the copyright); they're all multinational.

      Each teenager who downloads a Justin Bieber song instead of buying it means $1 gain for his country and $1 loss for USA

      Even if it were true that the USA is the only exporter of creative content (as I said, it's not), if the teenager doesn't have a dollar to spend on the Justin Bieber song, nobody has lost that dollar; it didn't exist in the first place. Plus, if he does have that dollar, it's been shown in study after study that music pirates spend more money on music than non-pirates. For all practical purposes there is an infinite amount of content, but not even Bill Gates has an infinite amount of money.

      Please take anything the lying thieves at the MPAA/RIAA say with a grain of salt. To quote Dan Ankroyd from the making of the Blues Brothers, "When I went to college I studied criminal law, criminal psychology, and deviant psychology. Then I went into show business."

    5. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      Who cares about his nationality? I was speaking about the record sales, and even most European artists get handled by the big couple record labels which are headquartered in the USA, pay taxes in USA and execs spend money in USA - and only a few percent get back to the artist in his country.

    6. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      I said *net* exporter; for both Japan and France music+movies are a negative effect on balance of payments - according to money flows they import more "copyright" than they export.
      There are no "multinational" concept in import/export issues - in the end, money stops somewhere at some person or company in some country which gains the benefit of this trade. I am not speaking about content flow as much as about the effect on national balance of payments - which for movie and music industry mostly flow to USA according to the statistics.

      Still, my main topic is that no matter how much money the teenager has and what he is going to buy with it, maybe the governments should be thinking on building incentives how (s)he can spend his entertainment money in a way it does not flow to RIAA/MPAA - for example, if he buys music CD's in shops, then it may be beneficial (ignoring the moral issues here) for the country if these CD's are copied and no royalties paid out to foreign companies. This has been seen as an argument by, for example, Russian officials when not especially bothering with enforcing foreign copyright complaints.

      The sad fact is that for most of the world it would make sense to intentionally abandon Berne treaties as far as they apply to movies and music - copyright is enforceable internationally only because countries around 1904 thought that it was a good idea politically and didn't matter much economically; but now entertainment is a huge industry and for most countries it is a financial burden when their citizens purchase 'copyrighted entertainment' from abroad. Almost countries, except USA, would benefit greatly from, say, setting maximum copyright length at 5-7 years - the money their citizens pay for this stuff would drop in half immediately, as any popular recordings/movies older than that would be available from local distributors at very low prices.
      MPAA/RIAA would scream bloody murder, naturally, and USA would use all it's pressure in WTO to prevent this like they did with pharmaceutical patents when Brazil and India needed to manufacture generic medicines to save millions of their citizens. They would likely succeed at the moment. Which is good for USA. And bad for everyone else.

    7. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by dkf · · Score: 1

      The fact is the US is a massive beast when it comes to capital goods.... you know those important things you can't really live without? Turbines, semiconductors, engines, medicine, telecommunications, ect.
      The US imports shit we want; but we export shit you need. The US is not the country you want to get into a trade war with; you will lose.

      You underestimate the size of European manufacturers of those things (except for semiconductors, where it's mostly imported from East Asia, just like most semiconductors in the US are made there). A trade war would be painful - for both sides - but to think that it's inconceivable because there are things the US makes and Europe needs but can't make? The evidence for that is really minimal.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    8. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      In the world, USA is the only one net 'exporter' of audiovisual copyrights. That means that for any of the European governments, anyone who buys movies or music from USA just creates some trade deficit and harms the local economy - sure, there are treaties starting from Berne convention where they have agreed that they should protect copyrights, but keeping a practical mind in this economy means that it is in the country's best interests just to do the bare minimum instead of being effective.

      Each teenager who downloads a Justin Bieber song instead of buying it means $1 gain for his country and $1 loss for USA, where the record studio execs would be spending their profits.

      Actually it doesn't work like that.

      The amount of money spent by the average person on entertainment is fixed, if you can afford to spend 40 EUR a month on entertainment you can still spend 40 EUR a month on entertainment. So if you buy 4 10 EUR CD's you have 4 CD's and the media cartels have 36 EUR (4 EUR to the artists/writers). If you buy 4x10 EUR CD's and pirate 4 CD's you have 8 CD's and the media cartels have 36 EUR.

      At worst, you pirate four CD's and spend that 40 EUR on movie tickets in which case the media cartels still gets the vast majority of that 40 EUR.

      The idea of total copyright enforcement increasing sales is false as every study into the subject has proven (piracy is free marketing, this has actually increased sales) but to be more specific Ubisoft's recent always online DRM with Assassins Creed only decreased sales and returns.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each teenager who downloads a Justin Bieber song instead of buying it means $1 gain for his country and $1 loss for USA, where the record studio execs would be spending their profits.

      .. on imported cars, electronics, etc... even fine art and food. so call it a $0.10 loss for the USA and $0.90 combined loss for china, japan, italy, germany, france, russia, cuba and other producers of products coveted by rich americans.

    10. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is more complicated than that.
      For one thing, it is not in the best interest of Europe to hurt the US economy. (The inverse is not true.)
      The US is a big market for European products, and about the only things the US can offer in return is Hollywood products and Dollars. Hurting the US economy hurts the Dollar, and the EU has lots of Dollars by now which they hope to be able to spend on something more substantial than entertainment sometime.

    11. Re:Why governments act against their interest? by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      If you spend your 40 EUR entertainment funds buying cd's "copied locally" without paying royalties, go to a movie theatre which doesn't pay royalties to the producers and go to a bowling hall with the rest of the money, then all the money has stayed within the country - and a country could achieve that by either officially reducing copyright (say, getting out of Berne convention and setting a 5-7 year max) or by not bothering to enforce foreign copyrights, as some SE Asia countries or Russia tends to do.

      This is not about individual decisions on piracy vs. buying, this is about government interest to deliberately hurt all sales of all foreign media cartels and their royalty models.

  43. There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flaw is that the musicians aren't the ones making the money! 75+ percent of every entertainment dollar spent goes to straight the labels. The musicians are already slaves-to the labels! If you really are as concerned about not 'ripping off" creative people then you'd be getting your facts straight before making a fool of yourself in public!

    1. Re:There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The flaw is that the musicians aren't the ones making the money!

      Ah, yes. There always has to be someone deparate enough to continue to rip off the entertainment they want that they'll make this specious and morally bankrupt argument. I'll even translate it for you: "Artists want to be published, and some of them choose to work with a record label that will front the costs, handle the legal stuff, and take all of the financial risks (which are significant, since most artists are failures at attracting or holding a large audience). And early in their careers, much of the revenue goes to the person who took the financial risk, and spent the up-front money while the artist demonstrates whether or not they have the staying-power to grow, attract a wider audience, and have to clout to negotiate a contract that makes them more money. I hate this because it reminds me of the uncomfortable reality that most poeple aren't talented, and it also reminds me that most artists are terrible business people, and if they didn't go with a professionally managed lable, they would do even worse on their own, and probably lose everything."

      That about size it up? Are you forgetting how many labels are started, every year, by the artists themselves? Specifically so they can sign new talent under conditions they think will be attractive to new talent? Have you completely missed the part where an artist with anything like a chance of developing a large following can pick and choose between labels who are competing to offer them more attractive terms? Are you pretending not to notice the number of artists who now self-publish, using any of a zillion of new methods for selling their works?

      getting your facts straight before making a fool of yourself in public

      Maybe you should try that, before attempting to score rhetorical points using a hollow, junior high school level defense for ripping off music, straight out of 1997 or so. Unless of course you are in junior high school, still, which seems more likely.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Technological advances made it possible to record, and later to creatively mix sounds and still or moving images and store the results in a re-playable medium. The scarcity of the medium and the expense of the recording and processing technology, coupled with demand for the product, made for a profitable business model. Over the years the business model changed and adapted as technology and demand changed. Now further technology advances have reduced the scarcity and expense of manufacturing to virtually nil, and demand patterns have changed as well. The business model must change, and is doing so, but those who have entrenched financial interest in maintaining the status quo will quite naturally resist change. So it goes, throughout history.

      At the moment, we are in the midst of a tumultuous turning point in the business of recorded entertainment. Morality disagreements aside, it will be interesting to see where it goes in the next decades.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    3. Re:There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The business model must change, and is doing so

      And every business model they try, the usual slashdot legion of filesharers pop up and complain; many of them will not be happy with anything other than the right to share whatever files they want.

    4. Re:There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Informative

      many of them will not be happy with anything other than the right to share whatever files they want

      Or more precisely, many will not be happy with anything other than the consequence-less ability to rip off entertainment whether or not the people who invest money in creating that entertainment want to give it away for free just that moment.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by gophish · · Score: 1

      I miss the good old days, before these newfangled wax cylinders. Back then you had to go find a group of musicians if you wanted music. Back then the only ones making any money were the ones selling booze. Maybe those days will come again...

      Once there were parking lots, now its a peaceful oasis.
      This was a pizza hut, now its all covered in daisies... etc.

    6. Re:There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I had a long carreer in production and performing in the music industry.

      Whilst sound engineering a popular Australian act at a live performance on a city street the following incident occoured.

      Joe Cammileri after finishing a song waved a copy of his latest album CD and said, looking stratight at the record execs at the side of stage; "You should buy my CD from the record shop opposite. or you could just put 20 cents in my hat-my income is the same either way.

      You obviously dont realise that he hollywood accounting applies in the music business too.

      I never encountered a popular musician who LIKED working for record companies-in general the detested the way they were treated.

      Nearly all acts that work for major companies make all their profits from live performance and merchandising.

      There was plenty of music long before there were record companies. A genuine artist does thier work for the love of it not commercial gain.

      Try sticking to subjects you have a clue about.

    7. Re:There is a HUGE flaw in your arguement! by symbolset · · Score: 1
      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  44. Can't connect by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    My dns client (my laptop) can't get an ip for tpb as of 7/9/10 14:55 GMT. Of course, at the moment I'm sitting in a waiting room at Ceders-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles using the campus' free wifi service, they might be blocking it. I'll try a look up later from home.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  45. Hmm.. by UnSkiLd · · Score: 0

    So what would keep these governments from taking over the servers and monitoring those that connect to it to upload and download files? My biggest worry is just that, the person I am connecting to and downloading from is actually a monitor that is either sending me a bogus file, or getting information from me. I think im done torrenting for a while..not worth it anymore.

  46. As if millions of torrents suddenly cried out ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in terror and were suddenly silenced. I feel as though something terrible has happened.

  47. Time for the tinfoil hat, eh? by sweatyboatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I salute you for resisting using all caps and maintaining a conversational tone, at least.

    You're positing that all the world's problems are not only solvable, but easily solvable. I'm sorry to break this to you, but humanity is not omnipotent, we're barely competent. And yes, I am including those bad actors you accuse of creating war, disease and starvation in order to profit.

    You mention some serious issues, but you're not helping to solve them by imagining a capitalist conspiracy of a mysterious "them" against the righteous "us". You're misdirecting your energies against ghosts and shadows instead of supporting what actually leads to progress: political activity, scientific research, charity and education.

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    1. Re:Time for the tinfoil hat, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't believe he's hinting at conspiracies - he's just stating an inevitable fact about the capitalism/free-market combo. It's an emerging effect of the system and not a consciously engineered one.

    2. Re:Time for the tinfoil hat, eh? by hercubus · · Score: 1
      you are naive if you think there isn't a "them" - though you have a point there's not really an "us" and certainly not righteous even if it existed

      "they" did create a war, magicked WMD right out of thin air, or, put less delicately, pulled straight out of "their" ass

      also naive in the extreme to imagine that there is _anything_ you can do politically. you have no power, you mean exactly nothing

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    3. Re:Time for the tinfoil hat, eh? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      There are two small assumptions in your reply that I think need to be pointed out.

      First, radtea never said anything about it being easy to solve the worlds problems, just that its currently easier and more profitable to those in power to not make the effort.

      Second, how do you know he is not doing anything to help? He doesn't say anything about whether he sits on his ass all day posting to /. or does volunteer work at an AIDS Hospice or some politically active charity.

      _

    4. Re:Time for the tinfoil hat, eh? by sweatyboatman · · Score: 1

      First:

      radtea never said anything about it being easy to solve the worlds problems

      actually that's exactly what he says:

      If wiping out hunger, poverty AIDS or terrorism would actually make someone money, then yes, it would be done very rapidly

      Second, it doesn't particularly matter to the conversation what radtea is doing offline. I reject the nihilistic world-view of the all-powerful-them vs. the victimized-us espoused in his post.

      --
      It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    5. Re:Time for the tinfoil hat, eh? by radtea · · Score: 1

      You're misdirecting your energies against ghosts and shadows instead of supporting what actually leads to progress: political activity, scientific research, charity and education.

      I can see how you might read that into what I wrote, which is pretty much context free. As it happens, I am engaged in all the things you suggest, and spend far more time and energy on them than posting rants on /.

      Nor, to be picky about it, did I suggest these problems were easy. I said they would be solved quickly. The two are very different.

      The United States put a man on the Moon and returne him safely to Earth in less than a decade, which is in my view extremely quickly, but I hope no one would suggest it was easy!

      Likewise, India went from near-starvation under a command economy to a food exporter in less than 20 years, which is surely not an easy problem but again, a relatively quick solution, at least by my standards.

      Nor do I see that I have suggested anywhere there is a virtuous "us" against a vile "them". My point was that all humans everywhere, Left and Right, are driven by desire for power, and if we recognize that fact and use it we have a realistic chance of solving in relatively short order what appear to be intractable problems.

      They will still be hard problems, and the solutions will result in the wreckage of failed attempts being strewn across history, but compared to any other force in the world the desire of humans to seek and display power is pretty, well, powerful. I was responding to a comment that seemed to suggest these problems would always be with us, like the problems of municipal sanitation, or slavery, or any of a dozen other huge issues that have simply gone away for much (maybe even most) of the world in the past 200 years.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    6. Re:Time for the tinfoil hat, eh? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      "rapidly" does not mean "easy". Look at the Manhattan Project or the effort to get to the Moon. Both were "rapidly" done but they where not easy. Throw those kinds of resources at any problem and you will get results in short order.

      From your post "You're misdirecting your energies against ghosts and shadows instead of supporting what actually leads to progress: political activity, scientific research, charity and education", that reads like your doing more than just rejecting his views.

      I actually think your last line from your reply to me; "I reject the nihilistic world-view of the all-powerful-them vs. the victimized-us ... " sums up your position in relation to redtea far better than anything else you wrote originally.

      Been fun, now I'm of to newer discussions. Regards, PGB.

      _

  48. No Phoenix by b4upoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Pirate Bay will not stay in the ashes for long. They will rise again, stronger and better than ever before. Make no mistake. This is not about file sharing as much as it is about politics. The corporations have had too much power for too long. Up the rebels!!!

  49. Eheh by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Except the police HAS no choice. Most western countries rather like the idea of the police NOT having any choices to make. They act on the instructions of their masters, either elected or at least appointed officials. Cops don't get to choose what and what not to enforce.

    Such a raid as this isn't decided at the donut stand or whatever swedish cops eat. It is decided... well... that is the question isn't it? Police and prosecutors who work for the public good have always made it clear that this kind of stuff is very low priority to them. So who countermands them?

    And then, you find such incidences as in France, were the person putting in new laws is married to someone who works in the entertainment industry. Corruption? No... not directly. More the willfull neglect of the voice of the people by only listening to a small segment.

    You compare speeding with piracy... so how many children are killed by copyright infringement each year? I do admit, that I have downloaded at unsafe speeds before, even while drunk, but the only time blood was spilled is when I cut myself on the celophane wrapper of my new modem.

    So, WHY did a lot of cops NOT spend their day catching people who drunk drive, rapist and others who harm society and went after nerds in their bedroom who harm the profit margins of a very small group of people, often foreigners?

    You would think with all the corruption in Europe and terrorists they let slip by, they would have more important things to do. Like say capture REAL pirates doing REAL harm to commerce. Funny that the people so hot on piracy never go after real pirates who can shoot back. Aparently interrupting millions of dollars in shipping isn't as big a crime as copying music.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  50. Utter tripe.... by tacokill · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Unfortunately, capitalists have learned that genuinely fixing problems is rarely the way to maximize their power. Far better to sell a more-or-less ineffective "solution" like the security-industrial complex's "War on Terror" or drug cocktails for AIDS or subsidized "food aid" for povery and hunger. Insert your corporation into one of those cash torrents and you will be in a position of power for decades to come.

    ....except there is this little thing called "competition" that drives capitalists towards producing a better product. If they don't, they run the risk of someone else displacing them. If they purposely hold back (for any reason) then they place their precious "power" at risk. Don't you get it? In a capitalist economy, the very power you speak of comes from providing the most value. And you provide the most value by continually innovating more than the other competitors in your field (and also doing lots of other things correctly).

    I can't believe you went through all of that and then failed to point out the competitive influence angle. That's just one of many beauties found in capitalism - and you just pretend it isn't even there. As if there is some grand conspiracy amongst capitalists to produce sub-par items for the stupid, unsuspecting public......c'mon, get a grip. Companies produce what the market demands. Otherwise, they can't get that power you speak of.

    1. Re:Utter tripe.... by hercubus · · Score: 1
      competition. right. like the raging competition between ISPs in America? because, obviously, we have the most competitive system so we have the fastest pipes on the planet, right?

      and the airlines provide free drinks, free meals, and treat you like a person, right?

      how do clueless, bend-over-and-rape-me-mr-ceo types always get modded up? for spewing clueless libertarian claptrap? bleh

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    2. Re:Utter tripe.... by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      When competition is stifled by the players already in the game, we don't have capitalism any more. We have an "insert whatever rule by corporation/business is called here" instead, and that is exactly what we have in the USA.

  51. Re:Utter complete and total tripe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe you went through all of that and then failed to point out the competitive influence angle. That's just one of many beauties found in capitalism - and you just pretend it isn't even there. As if there is some grand conspiracy amongst capitalists to produce sub-par items for the stupid, unsuspecting public......c'mon, get a grip. Companies produce what the market demands. Otherwise, they can't get that power you speak of.

    If what you say is true, why is there dearth of broadband options in the United States? It is common knowledge that there is collusion among corporations (google the Mitsubishi, Hitachi, and Toshiba price-fixing conspiracy on memory). So, in other words, corporations can make mighty fine profits on sub-par products by collusion, bribery, and other shenanigans.

  52. i don't know by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    maybe the part with affordable healthcare

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i don't know by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but in Europe there are no socialist countries since the fall of Berlin wall.

      Greetings from Hungary

    2. Re:i don't know by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      refer to the original posting again please: the word socialism means a lot of things to a lot of people. Apparently you failed to appreciate the point. I'd say "woooosh" :)

      For the record though: Hungary has never been socialist. There were just a heck of a lot of people claiming it was, from both sides of the Iron Curtain for nearly the same purpose (to keep the people in line by fear: one side by fear of Evil Capitalism, the other by fear of Evil Communism). But socialism means that the workers, the people who actually create all the stuff around you, were in control of the state. And in control means that THEY are telling the police how to act, direct the army, and generally elect whoever they want to elect. Are you going to tell me that was a good description of Hungary?

      What you had was a highly centralized version of capitalism (state-capitalism), run by a semi-hereditary clan of bureaucrats. Comparable in some ways to Japan or Korea, with the flags having a different colour and a different themesong playing when the president arrives. The difference with Japan etc. was that this capitalism did not allow ANY competition inside the state.

      So don't get scared by the word "socialism": the word itself is meaningless, at the moment, since noone has a clue what you mean if you use it. It does work wonders in the US if you like to provoke people, though. Like a red flag to a bull, you might say :)

      And basically, that was what the GP was trying to say, I think.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    3. Re:i don't know by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      1, Sorry but the word socialism is/was "trademarked" by the Soviet Communist Party, and they called their (and our) system socialism.
      2, Please cite Swedish politician calling their system socialism.
      3, "But socialism means that the workers, the people who actually create all the stuff around you, were in control of the state. And in control means that THEY are telling the police how to act, direct the army, and generally elect whoever they want to elect. Are you going to tell me that was a good description of Hungary?"
      Are you telling me it's a good description of any current European country? (There are no planned economies here but market economies. And not only workers participate in politics.)

      4, Even if we take your definition, socialism doesn't mean that in Europe since 1917.

      5, I know what the GP was trying to say, but you know, words have meanings and they're not freely interchangeable. I want to educate American ./ readers: taking your definitions from Fox news and Red Scare propaganda isn't a good idea.

      6, Whoosh.

  53. there is absolutely moral justification by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    but there is a technological and economic justification

    meanwhile: is there any moral justification to standing in front of a lake, pointing guns at people and forcing them to buy bottled water instead?

    well that's our current ip system, in the internet age: the internet is the lake, the endless free resource that threatens to put the bottled water guy out of business

    ip law is for the benefit of distributors that the internet has replaced, not creators. creators don't need distributors anymore, society doesn't need distributors anymore. simple disruptive technology and basic economics at work

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  54. Check out I2P for Tor-like torrents by Burz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.geti2p.net/

    What's interesting is that I2P has been gaining popularity much more rapidly in Europe than elsewhere. I guess HADOPI-type laws are having their effect. In the far east the project is forming partnerships with dissident groups so that media files and other large data sets can be transmitted in relative safety.

    Bittorrent, iMule and a distributed filesystem are available on the network which is both anonymized and highly decentralized (moreso than Tor).

    1. Re:Check out I2P for Tor-like torrents by FreenetFan · · Score: 1

      We are seeing a similar thing on Freenet: increasing popularity in places such as France with HADOPI laws.

  55. Re:Utter complete and total tripe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is there dearth of broadband options in the United States?

    Because phone and cable operators are generally granted monopoly status in a given market?

  56. Re:Utter complete and total tripe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I suppose that the benign government just gives this away, free of charge?

  57. this article was by "timothy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article was by "timothy".

    I take his articles with a grain of salt.

  58. Take him! / it?! by Imazalil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please take that shrilly devil spawn.

    xoxo,
    Canada

  59. What.cd by BlueWaterBaboonFarm · · Score: 1

    Doesn't seem to be working right now. I hope this is just a strange coincidence. Any news?

  60. do you have universal healthcare? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in the usa that qualifies as communism worse than north korea, or so the rightwing propaganda goes

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  61. Google RSS Adsense for this story by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Front Sight Firearms Training Institute.
    Yikes, Goog.

  62. do you have universal healthcare? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that's what the right wing assholes in the usa call socialism

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  63. your argument is wrong. here's why: by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yeah, but...

    What if time-traveling Hitler had cancer, but it was cured for free, so he used harsh sarcasm on your grandmother?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  64. Hunter-Gatherers by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    The instinct of survival is married to competition all the way down to our lizard hindbrains. This is why Capitalism - for all of its terrible manifold consequences - remains far more prefereable to humans rather than 'Washing the Peoples Truck'. Even the Central Committee realized this, but I give them about ten years before the tiger they are riding finally turns on them.

  65. As a political organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a (somewhat) political organization, (probably not in full agreement with the ACTA/WIPO folks), does a police raid on their communications hub constitute a breach of the democratic process? TPB may not be mainstream, but certainly the big big corporate money backing ACTA/WIPO is not mainstream either, and TPB is trying to do things in the open, in light of full public scrutiny. ACTA/WIPO is a members only club, where you aren't allowed to have a say, your rights will likely be violated, laws will likely be broken, but because they are in suits, they get away with criminal acts against millions of people on a daily basis, without authorities batting an eye. TPB in contrast is merely bringing a sense of sanity to the process (copyrights were originally a right to copy, not a stick to prevent copying forever ...and 90 years past the death of an author is starting to look like forever...), and patents are becoming a bigger and bigger joke, and there is no sanity to it. Copyrights and patents are an artificial monopoly, originally designed for a short time. No math was allowed to be patented. Copyrights were less than a generation. TPB is a reaction to the FAR FAR overreaching (what an author creates in this 20's should be public in his 40's, not when his grandchildren are in their 60's). Patents should be good for a maximum of 30 years. Each time a patent is sold, the remaining time on the patent should be cut in half. Reform should have happened 50 years ago, and everything lately has been going in the WRONG direction.

  66. Should have known this would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn ninjas!

  67. what is that even supposed to mean? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i'm going to say that capitalism is the same as wahhabism

    the equivalency makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, but for some reason a bunch of morons will believe the two things are related, if i chant it enough or package it in simpleminded slogans

    do you even know what socialism means? no: i mean its logical coherent definition, what the word means conceptually, not its completely bullshit random connection with "scary words about bad people"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  68. TPB Never worked for me by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I don't know why, but torrents from TPB never, ever worked for me. Torrents from other sites, no problem for the most part.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  69. Tripe. It's not just for breakfast any more. by Torodung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No. As soon as the accumulation of power though "competitive markets" hits a critical mark, the most powerful competitor drives everyone else out of the market. All competitive capitalism leads to monopolistic plutocracy, if unchecked by some other monolithic power, usually a governmental entity.

    Standard Oil, Monsanto, Archer-Daniels Midland, Goldman Sachs, IBM, then Microsoft, AT&T, then AT&T again, take your pick.

    Someone has to wield the power, and the goal of capitalism is to become king of the hill and wield it, usually by knifing one's competitors in the back. Not to "compete in a market" or any of these other "free market" dogmas you seem to espouse.

    Eventually, capitalism fails. It becomes oligarchy. The entire system is designed to behave that way without some other, powerful monolithic entity to keep it in check.

    No solution here, just pointing out the obvious. Capitalism is defective by design, and you really have to watch who is getting power from your purchases/dollar votes. Capitalism without a popular entity to keep it in check always becomes centrally controlled (boardroom controlled) despotism. Then your only vote is a share in the stock market.

    That may be fine by you, but I don't believe I should have to buy my vote in a non-democratic system slanted to keep me in my place as an unhappy, disposable consumer.

    --
    Toro

    1. Re:Tripe. It's not just for breakfast any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, capitalism fails. It becomes oligarchy. The entire system is designed to behave that way without some other, powerful monolithic entity to keep it in check.

      Is the system flawed, really? Is that it, or perhaps the state of human nature involves competition? IF this is the case, consider yourself lucky you are given the opportunity to buy a vote and compete yourself.

      If you still believe in systems and not people, I guess we have to go all the way back to Plato's Republic. Why be good?

    2. Re:Tripe. It's not just for breakfast any more. by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Yes. The system is inherently flawed, and it takes the vigilance of individuals, acting collectively if the unbalancing entities are large, to keep it running.

      Democratic government isn't so much a "system" as it is a kludge. If you expected better of it, expect less. If you believe in it, you're being foolish.

      Individuals shouldn't have to purchase anything to be given a modicum of respect. I do not feel privileged or "lucky" to have respect available to me as a product.

      All a person should have to do to enjoy a vote is be able to produce something. If you have something of value to offer, you should enjoy the respect of others. Large scale entities (including government) should not interfere with this basic equation. If they do, they cannibalize their own society, in the long run.

      Deciding what is "of value" is the tricky part. That's the only reason we have markets. They are not governance, they are a way of determining value.

      This is something we have utterly lost sight of. At this point, it is our ability to purchase respect that garners it in our "capitalist" society, abstracted from value by a poorly governed marketplace, whether it is earned or inherited.

      I do compete quite well, but it is not my privilege to do so, it is my right. My rights are being interfered with by large scale, liability shielded entities. They do not compete on a level playing field in a putative "free" market.

      I don't believe in a system. I believe in maintaining a system for as long as it remains viable according to its spec. All systems, like anything else made by man, eventually fail.

      --
      Toro

  70. back up! by kermyt · · Score: 1

    TPB is back up again already.

  71. tradeoff between anonymity and speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hey, same AC here.

    Yes, I2P, or any system offering REAL distributed anonymity will be slower than connecting directly through TCP/IP. It really stands to reason, it's a tradeoff: Some CPU will go to X layers/hops of encryption, and some network traffic will go to route encrypted traffic around the network in X number of hops. However, your activities will be MUCH harder to track, especially when avoiding the use of exitnodes to connect to normal IP addresses, which is typical of Tor usage.

    Paid services may offer fast central servers. However, you will be registered as a customer, and who knows what kind of logging they're required by authorities to do, and what happens when they're bought up or starts to cave in somehow. How much is encrypted, or really anonymous, is also in question when you have to connect central servers, despite best efforts..

    Tor is fast, faster than I2P when used as an outproxy / exitnode. However, you are also a HUGE target when using outproxies / exitnodes, since everything has to go unencrypted and to real IP-addresses at the exitnodes. The exitnodes and servers beyond them, has to be trusted NOT to snoop or perform Man In The Middle attacks, since little else is stopping the exitnodes, or anything in between, to be a perfect setup for these kinds of attacks. Sending to real IP-addresses is also a wide-open portal for snoopers / MIT-adversaries into the "darknet" and its activities, which weakens the whole anonymity of the network. Ie., if the government decides Tor is used mainly for bittorrent, which may be easier to prove when snooping exitnodes, they may ban usage of Tor entirely (not likely though since Tor is also used for political propaganda/enlightenment, depending who you ask). Another question is the quality and speed of Tor exitnodes. They are really fast and first-class servers connected to "big tubes" ;-). You might be wondering what kind of logging goes on in there, and how much goes to intelligence agencies, while lesser-informed agents use Tor for "spying" or "secrets" (which Tor is really NOT that suitable for, anonymity != secrecy != security, especially in Tor's case).. Lastly, maintainers of Tor has stated they do not want bittorrent on their network. As Tor is not made to scale up to such traffic, so it might be blocked in the future.

    I2P offers alot more: anonymous bittorrent, "eepsites" (anonymous www-sites), anonymous mail, anon-IRC and arbitrary tunnels that you setup yourself, working within its own "darknet", thus avoiding leaks to bystanders (a bit similar to VPNs). All this works out-of-the-box in I2P and can easily be extended in Java, so its worth checking out. Odds are, you can already find most common torrents using I2PSnark, and you can be part of exploring and extending a real anonymous community. It's quite satisfying to see how the project is developing and how much thought has gone into anonymity.

    There are also other bittorrent clients on I2P, and iMule, is the I2P-version of the "Mule"-series, as well as other protocols like gnutella.

    I2P works by using garlic-routing, which is like onion-routing with hidden-services in Tor: Every node, except the sender, only knows its peers and the next target, not any nodes extending beyond that for any given message. Every link in the chain can only decrypt its own packet, and only the last node can decrypt the entire message. Thus, both sender and receiver remains anonymous, even to each other. The contents are also kept encrypted through the whole chain, except for sender and receiver. Very interesting stuff when you read up on it..

    A bit of caution though. I2P has not reached version 1 yet, so full anonymity is not guaranteed. It will be more secure than most other services, paid or free. It is open source / public domain, but also a work in progress. Don't do serious criminal activities on I2P, as it is frowned upon by the community as well.

    I tried Freenet some years ago, but I2P has had me positively surprised many times over. It's MUCH more

    1. Re:tradeoff between anonymity and speed by FreenetFan · · Score: 1

      I would recommend trying out Freenet again - it has been improving massively over the past few years. Estimates suggest it has about 10,000 nodes at the moment and increasing steadily, especially in places like France where ISP spying laws have come in recently.

      A 700MB file can easily be downloaded overnight.

      I was under the impression that I2P had stagnated recently because a main developer had left, but I may give it another try to see how it compares to Freenet.

  72. pornbay.org by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    http://www.pornbay.org/ and its tracker is down :(

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  73. amazing by Asaf.Zamir · · Score: 1

    It never ceases to to amaze me how they get so much police force, just because some rich people say money is the new god. they wouldn't get that kind of force even for war criminals.

  74. Emergence by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Emergent behaviors are not conscious in the members of the group but can easily be misinterpreted to be some sort of leader planning or group think. Don't assume that simply because you may do this or see this that the world operates similarly. It is very human to think geese plan to fly in a V shape - its a fractal pattern that emerges without any planning whatsoever. Some will see the pattern try to make theory and rules from it and perhaps say its proof god's influence that such "headless" intelligence exists.

    Capitalist conspiracies are far more real than people realize; however, a lot of the evil that goes on is thoughtless emergent behavior - only a little bit is individuals contributing their ill will to the direction; from little Eichmanns to big Eichmanns, even leaders become caught up in the momentum there is no inside control/plan to easily point to. Sure there are groups of like minded people complicating the whole thing and possibly their understanding is enough that they can nudge the beast towards their goals but not as much as one would like to think.

    I tend to see these things as ghosts in the system; but unlike computer science fiction, these are real -- ghosts running on human social systems. Even that is not so simple in that the two are influencing each other and each have some degree of consciousness of the other. (the 'ghosts' not having a normal sense of consciousness obviously.) Many people who see evil emergent patterns attribute it to a thought or force and will give it a name like The Devil; some famious psychologists have done so (few openly) while others see it as a perfect example of emergence.

    See the Stanford prison study as a primer. Then think about how when acts are abstracted by removing them it becomes easier to get people to do them - money is 1 layer and there are good studies showing that removing just 1 layer past money can get honest people to do things that everybody would disapprove of with money. (You should already be familiar with the famous Milgram Experiment.) Its bad enough with money, but we have multiple levels... Now we have this whole P.R. created belief system around "intellectual property" that makes the intangible into something tangible...