Slashdot Mirror
Shuttleworth Answers Ubuntu Linux's Critics
climenole writes "Technomancer wrote: 'Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu Linux's founder, maintains that he and Ubuntu are doing right by the Linux community and the even larger open-source community. In recent weeks, Ubuntu has been criticized for not giving Linux enough support. Specifically, the complains have been that Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu, doesn't do enough for producing Linux source code.'"
The IT world link takes you to an interstitial ad, followed by a godawful mishmash of crap.
Here's a link to the original post: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/517
We could link to Mark's actual blog post http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/517 instead of linking to some crappy IT World "article."
Do you think it might have something to do with the fact that Ubuntu also has more users than those other distros combined?
I can't follow the link here but do you mean that there are more bugs reports in ubuntu than other distros? I would argue that the bug database is the most important feature of the ubuntu distro. I have raised bugs there and seen them propagated to the originating projects.
http://michaelsmith.id.au
Is it his opinion that the [default] desktop environment that Ubuntu provides is better for the Linux desktop ecosystem than all other environments at the moment?
Having tried the few options available, I hereby submit that there is an environment that in my opinion, is better for desktop Linux in functionality and license as compared to the default. I leave names out on purpose.
Ubuntu has encouraged me to submit bugs and even maintain a ppa for packages I couldn't find on ubuntu. Ubuntu has encouraged me to contribute because the community is active and friendly. Redhat never did that for me.
Personally, I'd say that "Linux" is probably closer to "Gnome/Linux" than "GNU/Linux" for a large and growing proportion of Linux users, but that's just me.
I have Ubuntu installed on 8 machines and agree. It solves all my problems and...whenever I mess it up, which I sometimes do, the huge community or the ease of use helps me repair it. I once even deleted the entire MBR + parts of the partition table and then managed to restore it before I rebooted.
Have you heard about SoylentNews?
Further, it probably has the least number of technical users because it's probably the most popular "plug-and-play" (or close to it) distro there is. Thus, there may be fewer people who can trouble-shoot their own problems.
Table-ized A.I.
heh I applied for a membership on the DSL fourms 4 years ago just to post a question, and have still not been approved I spent nearly an hour today on slackware trying to see what options I had with a no cd no usb boot system, finally on some 3rd party blog I found a 5 page walk though that read like Russian stereo instructions so yea they may seem to have more problems, but its honestly hard to get any other distro's to even setup a localized place to ask questions, I love it on my home machines, hm how do I do that, Oh I know... google XYZ on ubuntu and there is a half dozen threads all pointing me in the right direction and that is a good thing, no matter how much the hardcore nurds want to spin it
That would be untrue. Do we look at overall problems or just those involved in a Linux distro. Who would fall as worst in this category then?
You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/GNU+Network+Object+Model+Environment
Okay, Gnome is part of the GNU project, I'll admit forgetting about that when I posted that comment. Never mind.
A lot of Ubuntu's critics say what they say because they think they are "too good" for it since it comes with training wheels on. Ubuntu, being a distro, has no obligation to write source code -- that is done by thousands of programmers elsewhere, and they are doing a damn fine job. A distro is meant to package the work of those programmers in a way that people can use it without needing a CS degree, and Ubuntu is getting that right imo.
So, the critics need to stfu and stick with their obscure distros.
This is the "cool people" phenomenon, like we see in music. These people will go round telling everyone how much they like X niche band as long as nobody knows about it, but if/when that band becomes popular, they'll start saying "Oh, I don't like that any more!". Same here, except with niche software.
you, sir, are and
Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
I've been paying attention for a long time. I've done the distro hopping dance for years, and I've been advocating Linux all the while. In 15 years of Linux use, for me personally, Ubuntu comes second only to OpenSUSE as far as getting out of my way and letting me get my work done. Ubuntu is the clear favorite among family and friends whom I have foisted Linux upon over the years. I've gotten far fewer "tech guy support" calls than any other distro, spent less time dealing with computer issues over the phone and I have definitely gotten fewer complaints. Therefore, I *am* inclined to believe the stats. They are doing something right, as much as it pains some to admit.
Ubuntu is without a doubt the best distro for most users. Yeah, I know I could have more customization with Debian, yeah, I know I could be faster if I ran Gentoo, yeah, I know I could be more on the bleeding edge if I used Fedora, but when it comes down to it, Ubuntu is the best distro for most people. I -like- the fact there is a forum where I can post a question and it is answered in about 15 minutes, I like the fact I can do 99.999% of the things I need to do without using the CLI, and I like the fact that I have a lot of software in the repository.
And the best part is there isn't really any sacrifice. Is there anything that I can't do with Ubuntu that I can do with Debian? Just because I don't have to use a CLI for everything doesn't mean I can't if I want, etc.
Yeah, so Ubuntu doesn't have the nerd "cred" that I'd be getting if I ran Gentoo, but I have a usable system that is nearly infinitely customizable without having to sacrifice usability.
Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
Blech, there's no worse "statistic" than counting the number of Google results for various terms.
If you compare "bible" with "quran", you can see that there are about 10x the results for "bible". What does that indicate, are there 10x more Christians, or readers of the bible? You can also see that Malawi, Swaziland, Ghana, and Zimbabwe have the highest regional interest for "bible", so what can you conclude about that? Are those the most "Christian" nations? The US isn't even in the top 10, in fact all 10 are African nations. I see that Indonesia is ranked #8 for regional interest in "quran", can we conclude that Indonesia is the 8th most "Islamic" nation?
If you went on only those numbers, you would conclude that followers of the bible greatly outnumber followers of the quran. The actual difference is about 2x, not 10x. You would also conclude that Pakistan, Gambia, and Somalia are the worlds largest Islamic countries, but the largest (by population) is Indonesia.
Google "stats" are pretty useless.
"Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
You only have to contribute back if you use someone's code, modify it, and distribute it.
If you don't wish to then don't use it.
Gosh, that seems to have blown your whole argument out of the water?
You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
Odd. Myself and a couple of my colleagues recently got laptops preinstalled with SLED at work. The experience was generally less positive than with other (free) distros. The SLED repos are only installed after you register with Novell, and trying to get any sort of multimedia setup going on it was a nightmare. OTOH we have openSUSE on several desktop machines, works like a charm.
I guess the only advantage of SLED would be that it plays nicer with Microsoft solutions, but we don't use those too much at work.
You are getting trolled. Just thought you wanted to know that.
Yeah I don't get this move either. Sure a line of code or theme change can move them back to the right easily but I wonder who thought it would be a good default in the first place. I love the current release though the Windows installer worked great and everything worked on my laptop after the install without my help. I only had Win XP on it previously.
So he's the guy who has been comparing my bits and telling me if they match all these years!
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
They want to put other stuff on the right side. I just wish we could kill the whole title bar idea. It serves no purpose other than to waste space. Just put the buttons right on the same bar that says File Edit View in 90% of apps.
Ubuntu is a very popular Linux distro, which I can only assume is pulling quite a bit of interest to Linux. A fraction of these new Linux users are also logically speaking developers. And these would then be potential Linux contributors.
I have a hard time seeing how spending a lot of effort into making the most popular desktop Linux distro on the market could be a bad thing even when going as specific as Linux contributions. Developers are just a subset of users! Any successful distro is a good distro for Linux, and heck, it's not even important to be successful. That's kind of what this whole open OS is about. Play around and have fun. If you're doing well too, well, that's a nice bonus for Linux!
And Ubuntu is among those that are doing well.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Well, neither "A Glass of Coke" is actually a recipient made of a sugar-flavoured drink. It's a common grammatical rule called Metonymy, and it's commonly used to exemplify the language to avoid excessive verbosity.
The same could be said about the idea of prepending GNU to Linux, giving to the name the dubious function of being considered somewhat an homage or representation of the intentions of the author. Personally I'm not offended if my friends just call me "Sal" without citing everytime my father's and my grandfather's name like some aristocrat used to think. It would just make every conversation tiring, ad would give an idea of self-importance more annoying than anything else to my speaker.
I've done a little back reading on this now to see what it's all about. And all I can say is for goodness sake, don't bite the hand that gives you free stuff. Personally, I usually choose gentoo or fedora. But I still recognise the value of Ubuntu.
Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
You only have to contribute back if you use someone's code, modify it, and distribute it.
If you don't wish to then don't use it.
Gosh, that seems to have blown your whole argument out of the water?
No, actually, he said (twice in fact!) that Ubuntu encouraged him to contribute. Not forced or guilted.
As in: the Ubuntu community made him want to contribute to that community, resulting in---more contributions from the community!!! That's his argument, which is pretty clear if you read rather than skim.
I am an old school user from the beginning with Slackware and such. I settled on Redhat because it felt the best to me. This was before Ubuntu came out and Debian was on the map but no competition yet for Redhat. (I'm sure that will be a matter of opinion for many though.) In spite of all the great things about Ubuntu, I'm stuck with Redhat because I simply know it too well. It is largely quite predictable in the way they do things and in their philosophies. That they are active contributors to the source and supporting software is nice but not the reason I continue using and supporting Redhat.
I was dismissive of Ubuntu at first. One of the biggest turn-offs to me was the fact that nearly everyone refuses to say the name properly. (Damnit! The U makes the same sound each time! Ooo-boon-too! Why is it so frikkin hard?!) To me, that aspect alone makes me think idiots will use it. (I know I am WRONG as hell about that, but at some level, I tend to tie intelligence with linguistic skill) On top of that, I don't like the colors the defaults are using. Moreover, the naming convention? What plans have they after "Zippy Zebra?" And really? Are they intentionally copying famous comic books where the first letter of the first and last names have to be the same? (You know, like Peter Parker, Bruce Banner and all that?)
But you will notice I make no TECHNICAL complaints about Ubuntu... (well, there is one... apparently the way they set up their Avahi daemon doesn't work well with my SME DNS server... turn that off and it works fine.) That is mostly because I don't have any.
As far as the response of Shuttleworth? He's right on all counts. I completely agree with his responses. If any one distro helps make Linux a household word, it's Ubuntu. It's slick. It's polished. It seems to perform well everywhere I have seen it. And it is especially true about the source for information for the most solutions. It is the Ubuntu forums... good for me that I don't have much trouble translating from Ubuntu to Fedora. In some extremely important ways, Ubuntu is a huge contributor.
If Linux is being taken more seriously by the various industries out there, you can thank Ubuntu for a big part of it.
This is a combination of poor targeting to your market, and poor communications of what the end user is to expect "as good as windows" (which is a lie. linux is better than windows, but it is not a drop-in replacement, and anyone who says otherwise is a troll).
Apple doesn't market OSX as "as good as Windows". They're not stupid. The real advantages of linux are not price or as a windows replacement, and until the people who pimp ubuntu get a clue and realize that this is NOT the way to push linux, you're going to see 100x more complaints about ubuntu than about other distros.
Almost all of the vocal critics of Ubunutu I've seen have been trolls, FUDsters, and other worthless people. Has anyone raised serious legitimate criticism of Ubuntu?
what's up with doing things their own way, instead of the standard way? On every other apache distribution I've seen httpd.conf is the main config file, but not on Ubuntu... it's apache2.conf. I had to look that up. Ubuntu is full of things like this.
Mind you, their way works, and Ubuntu has great support and lively community and so on... but why do they insist on being different?
Don't forget Xorg. GNU/Xorg/Linux? GNU/KDE/Xorg/Linux? I think that catches pretty much everything outside of /opt. It's kind of unwieldy to say, though.
:) )
(Does that also imply we should say KDE/Xorg/FreeBSD or GNU/Xorg/FreeBSD, etc.? Even better, what about people running GNOME on Mac OS or KDE on Windows?
Funny how distros like opensuse, in comparison, have almost no complaints. Shuttleworth talks about "bringing linux to the masses" - the stats show that the number of people ubuntu turns off from all linux distros is a serious problem. The most telling is that, if current trends continue, ubuntu will have more complaints than Windows in 2 years.
I'll second that recommendation for OpenSUSE. In my experience, "it just works" on more hardware than Ubuntu, and YaST is a great admin tool.
If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
Novell is one of the biggest corporate contributors (of actual code) to open-soruce projects like GNOME and the Linux kernel. They are behind probably only behind Red Hat in total contributions.
My Vaio laptop has 3 OSes - Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, and a fsck'd OS X install. I regularly switch between Ubuntu and OpenSUSE - KDE 4 is still a bit wonky for me, but I've followed it and I'm hopeful. Ubuntu gives me grief with regards to my wireless, but other than that I like it, and would recommend it on the desktop.
Ignorance and prejudice and fear
Walk hand in hand
The question is, is it "WAY more people" proportional to how many people actually use the different distros? Proportions are everything. Bonds, McGwire (and a few others) may have a higher single-season home run record than Babe Ruth, but Ruth hit more home runs that season than the average team did that same season. Proportionally, Bonds and McGwire are pushovers.
Specifically, the complains have been that Canonical ...
Is this usage meant to be cute, or just plain illiterate?
The verb is complain (3rd person singular present = complains), the noun is complaint.
I'm a huge KDE fan and after getting fed up with Kubuntu I tried OpenSUSE. I really wanted to like OpenSUSE, and I did at first. I was very impressed with the LVM support in the installer and the ability to import my existing fstab settings. I have various data drives and Samba shares I like to have permanently mounted, and it was a pain to have to update these every time I do an install.
But after several days of frustration an automated kernel update botched and left me with an unbootable system, and rather than repair the OpenSUSE install I decided to go back to Ubuntu. After the magic of the initial install I got fed up trying to make it do the simplest things. For example, it wouldn't play MP3s out of the box (ridiculous!) so I went to the OpenSUSE site and found a very lengthy and poorly formatted forum-style wiki on setting up non-free decoders. I tried several of the different options and none worked. So after hours of hunting I came across a blog walking me through adding the gstreamer back end for Phonon and all of the restricted codecs, which were in a separate Packman repo with a dubious cert. After about 8 hours and a couple reboots I was finally able to listen to MP3s.
I also really dislike having to add all kinds of third party repos in order to install the simplest things. Yes it's flexible and free, but who do I trust? Will the packages and dependencies work together? Do these guys know what they're doing? Am I better of building from source? I don't want to have to go to some web site and search for an RPM, only to find several variations from various repos. How to I choose? And every time I opened the YaST package manager (which was frequently due to the spartan install) it would spend 2 minutes refreshing all of the packages. Installing Sun JDK 6 and updating the alternatives was a pain. Installing VirtualBox was a pain (it didn't add my user to the vboxuser group and failed with an vague error message.) Basically, it took me 3 whole days to get a system set up whereas in Ubuntu it's 3 clicks. Ubuntu even prompts you with a dialog if you try to do something but need a package that isn't installed (codecs, Samba, non-free drivers, you name it).
There's lots of other little irritating things too. Wireless didn't work, so I had to change to the other broadcom driver, which involved blacklisting kernel modules. I never got that working 100%... after every reboot I'd have to rmmod ssb bcwl wl and then modprobe bcwl before things would work. Also, KWrite was the default text editor and Kate wasn't even installed, so I hat to install Kate and update every single text MIME type to use Kate instead of KWrite. The menus are arranged so you have to navigate 4 levels deep to find anything, and the categorization is not intuitive. I also had to play around with ALSA to configure DMix so that sound would work. And for some reason you have to explicitly tell it you want 3D support and hunt down and install a bunch of non-default packages for that.
Other than the botched kernel update, these are the same issues I have with virtual every Linux distro. (Getting rid of noveau in favor of the proprietary Nvidia drivers on FC12 was a *bear*. No one should have to edit grub configurations and kernel module blacklists.) I've been using Linux for almost a decade, and it's still a pain to set it up. Ubuntu has its problems (pulseaudio stutters and has a wonky volume range; Ubuntu One music store is incredibly flaky) but its default configuration is much more friendly than the other distros, and the Wikis, forums, and bug tracking tools (and community) are outstanding. I much prefer KDE to Gnome, but I'd rather use the stable/clean Gnome on Ubuntu then KDE on another other distro. (I don't consider Kubuntu to be "stable".)
So kudos for Ubuntu ... it's not perfect, but at least they make the simple things simple and have sane defaults.
Wouldn't it stand to reason that the most popular Linux distro would have the highest amount of complaints and the highest amount of compliments?
In my completely unscientific survey, I just ran a Googlefight between "Ubuntu is awesome" and "Fedora is awesome" where Ubuntu had twice as many hits. I don't really think your comparison is valid.
...Thus, there may be fewer people who can trouble-shoot their own problems.
This creates a situation where lots of people complain about poor UI and UI gets improved as a result. Put a decent piece of software in front of the crazies and the crazies will complain, but I think the software will be better for it.
Most people don't seem to understand the criticism that Shuttleworth is responding to.
The open source community does not begrudge Ubuntu's success at all. The issue is that the Ubuntu project fixes a lot of bugs from "upstream" open source projects, but has so far done a poor job at submitting these patches back to the upstream projects.
I can understand why this happens: It's very, very hard to manage a project as big as a complete operating system, and very, very time consuming to have to adhere to every single protocol for contributing patches to every single upstream project. If the point is to get things done for the end user, then it happens that the upstream packages lose here. And that's where the bitterness comes in: because the upstream packages don't get these patches, it means that other operating systems that use these projects don't get these patches, either. It thus seems as if Ubuntu is only patching for itself.
I'm sure this isn't the intent, though. Some of the critics have gone a bit overboard in accusing the Ubuntu project of doing this on purpose. I think that's shortsighted and unhelpful, and that's what Shuttleworth is responding to here. Though, as eloquent as he is, he's not doing a good job in this post of addressing the critique.
My own opinion is that the fault is not with Ubuntu, but with the staggering diversity and fragmentation of the open source world. It's hard enough to create a distribution that consumes all these projects, to produce back to them is monumentally hard.
What should be done is create a more uniform way for projects to receive patches. Perhaps a central repository where these patches could be places, and project maintainers can pull these from and merge in, if they think it's appropriate.
Fat change this will happen? Maybe, maybe not. I'm very impressed by Ubuntu's leadership in getting the open source world to think more about diverse end users. I think there's an opportunity to use this leadership to try to create a more streamlines path for "upstream" contribution. Projects would benefit from bug fixes and patches, other operating systems will benefit, and everybody will just be so happy forever.
Gnome/Xorg/Debian/GNU/kFreeBSD :)
Dilbert RSS feed
You want a non-standard install on a no usb and no cdrom system and you wonder why you have issues finding help.
At that point you are far into the realm of advance because you have to use an alternate means such as staging the contents on disk or using a pxe based install. The latter isn't terribly difficult if you haven't done it before, but the first time setup isn't for the novice.
That is a really awful example of a problem solving situation.
With that said it is very unlikely that you need a distribution specific solution. There are many differences between distributions, but I have had little issue navigating the various system types. The exception for myself being Gentoo which made me do a triple take when reconfiguring some very legacy host I once found hiding in a rack.
"You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
That is why I left Ubuntu. I game a lot on my PC, and I couldn't stand PulseAudio. I don't give a rat's behind about slinging audio over the network, or bluetooth support. I just want the sound to come out of the speakers ASAP with low resource usage. Debian is my new distro of choice. For a time, I contemplated just going back to Winflaws, but then I had to re-install XP on another box the other day and I was reminded how MS treats it's customers like ****.
That said, even if they made PulseAudio an option (rather than a requirement) in Ubuntu, I doubt I would go back. I generally prefer a compact system with as few unnecessary things running as possible. My debian installs use much less memory because of it.
I guess Ubuntu and I have gone in different directions over the past 5 years.
If you compare "bible" with "quran", you can see that there are about 10x the results for "bible". What does that indicate, are there 10x more Christians, or readers of the bible?
No, obviously it indicates that the Christians chose the one and true God.
(this is a Funny not a Flamebait)
You can also see that Malawi, Swaziland, Ghana, and Zimbabwe have the highest regional interest for "bible", so what can you conclude about that? Are those the most "Christian" nations?
Actually, that might be a yes.
Well stop searching for those term then.
You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
In the blog entry, Mark writes about "... a willingness to chase down the problems that stand between here and there." From my experience, problems are not chased down but rather the Ostrich algorithm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostrich_algorithm is applied.
While running karmic (9.10), I noticed a bug with the network-manager pertaining static IP addresses and wireless connectivity, which made it unable to connect to certain configured wireless access points. Lets take a look at the network-manager released with 9.10: http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/net/network-manager , it is (0.8~a~git.20091013t193206.679d548-0ubuntu1).
Now lets look at the updates for karmic at http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic-updates/net/ , there is not a single one (!) for network-manager. For the whole six months until the next release of 10.04, not a single update for it has been provided! They just took the git snapshot and left it in 9.10.
Just compare it to Fedora 12 and their updates on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172857 , karmic (9.10) was released at October 29th, and one can see the fixes and updates through Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan for F12.
I do not care about the marketing strategies and public image of Linux distributions, but rather about exactly what Mark said, about " ... a willingness to chase down the problems that stand between here and there."
For me, Ubuntu did not deliver that.
Ubuntu did contribute something: getting Linux to 5% of Internet traffic on OS Statistics. Isn't the increase in notoriety enough?
Citation please.
Because you imagine it it doesn't make it so.
You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
Move on man, you are trolling. The fanboy reference in this case proves my point.
You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
Anyone denying that Ubuntu has significantly contributed to Linux is pretty much being an idiot. But the sentimental crap in that post ("miracle of human generosity"... please) makes me want to ditch it entirely and move to Gentoo or OpenBSD. Come on, Shuttleworth, you're not going to convince programmers of much by telling us about kids in New Zealand. And you're not going to convince the sentimental types either; you've got to talk about kids in sub-Sarahan Africa or Central America or Detroit to get them to notice.
Getting past that part, the bit about crushing Microsoft was nice, of course. But perhaps too good to be true, considering no names were named and Microsoft always has a backup plan.
That is utterly untrue.
And you have no knowledge of the circumstances of his incident.
You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
Grammar Nazi Karma strikes again...
It only took a quick scan of your post to see that you fucked up your punctuation and misused the word "using."
There's probably more there if I cared enough to read more closely.
I recommend a new day job.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
http://www.binplay.com/2010/07/cent-vs-ubuntu-for-web-serving.html
Says the person who used "There Fixed That For Ya!" in the same post. Surely, you meant "There, fixed that for you" ?
By criticizing ONE mistake in someone's spelling, you managed to commit THREE mistakes yourself. Namely, you omit a comma, capitalize all the words for no reason, AND misspell 'you' as 'ya'.
Keep up the good work, Mr Pot, and soon you'll be as black as Mr Kettle.
Ubuntu just happens to be the most popular distro. If it didn't exist the majority of that 5% would be using a different distro.
It isn't a community developed distro, they accept outside help but the direction of the distro is set entirely by Shuttleworth
Just look at what happened when he moved the buttons to the left and the community protested. Did he care? Not at all, the left side buttons are part of his plan to copy OSX.
Shuttleworth talks about the contributions of others but doesn't use the word 'linux' once on the Ubuntu home page. He wants to make an OSX clone and then keep all that nerdy Linux stuff in the basement.
We are computer geeks, we are not English majors. You are on the wrong site.
Now, Mr. six-digit ID, get the fuck off of my lawn.
-- I have a private email server in my basement.
... I already have an opinion on the topic. Ubuntu has clearly made a whole slew of poor design steps. The system works well over all, and the derivatives (Mint), clearly show the potential of some of the architectural choices that Ubuntu made early on. But Ubuntu itself? Brown? With crappy wanna-be mac buttons on the wrong side? With some heinous orange and piss colored icons scattered to and fro?
Ubuntu is actually a good OS. And their upstream involvement with Debian, and the hugely varied community of (mostly excellent) remixes are a testament to the solidity and correct design decisions of the actual code.
Maybe Shuttleworth is really a genius and was trying to foster all these remixes by branding his Linux after african language, painting it orange and brown, and implementing features that nobody wanted. In this way he was FORCING all the Ubuntu remixes to come to fruition, and in turn be truly the year of Desktop Linux (I'm looking at YOU Linux Mint Debian Edition)!
I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
Linux Mint is much easier for beginners, especially the myriad of people coming from Windows.
It's more stable, it's faster (in cases), and has better default apps.
Though I'd personally like to see them commit to VLC rather than the alternatives, and other default apps in addition.
The real existing problem that I see is a lack of games for Linux that really run well, but honestly, after watching the train wreck that was GTA 4 for Windows, well, I still enjoy Urban Terror AND it runs flawlessly on almost every recent Linux.
Still, I'd like to see a fully performing Dolphin on Linux, currently it's half the speed of it's Windows build. There's not even a commonly solid N64 emu that has updates or runs really well for most distros. You have to hunt all over Jesus for a .deb.
That being said, BSNES, arguably the best SNES emu in existence runs as well in Linux as it does in Windows. But maybe that was under wine. Fuck it I can't remember.
I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
I've not read the article, but as a long term linux and ubuntu user, I would say their contribution to community building and documentation that is the ubuntu forums kicks all kinds of kernel arse, to be honest.
1. The probability of you being the first or only person to have experienced this problem is approaching 0.
2. The probability of the problem either [solved] or in the process of being solved, by nerds that speak human, is approaching 1.
This is the Ubuntu forums. This is why you can put moderately techy people on linux and let them troubleshoot themselves.
... is that as soon as anyone starts using the Freedom everyone so highly touts, the community starts bitchin' that successful person needs to give them something.
Either it's truly Free or it's not, folks.
(Thus why most folks who need true Freedom, and have been around the block more than once, just use BSD for their products and systems, and are done with it.)
+++OK ATH
One thing all the whiners overlook is that while Canonical and the Ubuntu community have done diddly squat to contribute anything back to my project, my project actually gets developed primarily on Ubuntu boxes. We have a few people running other odd distros, but all our core people are on Ubuntu.
We have a mild preference for our users to be running Ubuntu, because that makes it much easier to repeat bugs. We get a lot of weird, unrepeatable reports from Slack and Gentoo users, for example, and what do you want me to do about it? I don't have time to dick around with every distro in the world. I need a distro I can install and have my development environment up and running in short order, and Ubuntu is the best I've found so far.
I'm a Debian guy originally, and I love Debian, but it's just too hard to develop on, because the stable version is always out of date. It's almost impossible to stay with Ubuntu LTS too, but their interim releases seem to be a lot less trouble than trying to run an un-released Debian.
I have used and toyed with Linux as a desktop OS since the mid 90's, beginning with Slackware, then including distros such as Red Hat, Debian, Suse, Fedora, Ubuntu, Mepis, Gentoo, Mandrake, Sabayon, and several others. I settled on Linux Mint a few years ago, which is known as a "more complete" and better derivative of Ubuntu; Mint is Ubuntu-based but includes a number of independently developed tools and a great user interface, though it is developed by a small group of fanatics. For a change, the Mint team recently released an excellent Debian-based version, in addition to their usual Ubuntu-based releases, which has been met with a lot of excitement.
I am already using Linux Mint Debian Edition as my main OS, but I still have a ton of respect for Ubuntu and Canonical. They have done a lot to raise awareness for Linux, and have developed a very usable OS that non-expert enthusiasts can use, as well as providing a great base for many other distros. Ubuntu is not an ideal server OS, or the be-all end-all OS that is absolutely perfect, but Canonical have done a great job with it and have worked admirably to promote free and open source software. If nothing else, they have inspired their competition to make things easier for home desktop users.
This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
"Windows is awesome" returns 16x more results than "Ubuntu is awesome", so that shows how reliable those results are.
Also noteworthy is that "Fedora is awesome" returns almost the same amount of results as "being gang raped in the ass is awesome". Is there some statistical significance in those numbers?
Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
This doesn't change the fact that WAY more people complain about ubuntu f$cking their machine than everyone else combined.
Probably more people complain about the common cold than about the black death. Your point?
What part of `yes no` don't you understand?
You only have to contribute back if you use someone's code, modify it, and distribute it.
Right, but if you don't modify it, just use and distribute? Isn't that what ubuntu is doing? So what's the criticism about in the original article?
Shuttleworth maintains that Red Hat produces a proprietary distribution, and whines when people complain about his company's product.
There's a word for guys like that...
Well, if you're going to copy something, isn't it better to copy OS X than to copy Windows? After all, KDE very heavily copies the look and feel of Windows. Before anybody jumps me, I'm not dissing KDE; I like it a lot and the only reasons I recently stopped using it is because of how broken the dual-head support is, and that AWN works a lot better in GNOME (I decided to copy the Mac way). As you may have noticed, Apple continues to sell tons of computers, and it's not the hardware driving that (lots of companies make excellent high-end hardware), it's OS X that's driving the sales. After I replaced my wife's old notebook with a MacBook Pro, she found out for herself that it's true: once you go Mac, you never go back. At least not to Windows; I do now and always will prefer Linux to Mac overall.
As for GNOME, well it goes its own way on some stuff (these are usually the parts of GNOME that suck the most) sort of copies Mac on some stuff (top panel) and Windows on some stuff, but I think overall it feels more Mac-ish than not.
Now, if somebody wants to really push the envelope of UI design and come up with something that leapfrogs both Apple and MSFT, I certainly support that and would definitely try it. If I liked it, I'd switch. I'm very What Have You Done For Me Lately? about desktop environments. Over the years I've used FVWM 95 AfterStep, Window Maker, GNOME 1.x, KDE 3.0 - 4.4 am currently back on GNOME, and I'm pretty sure I'm leaving out at least one DE or window manager, maybe two. Oh, yeah; Enlightenment!
However, the current state of the art of What Works Best For Me is the Mac UI. That doesn't mean the Mac itself is best for me, although I do have one at work and it's pretty darned good, but the UI design. That's why my Ubuntu desktops at both home and work look a lot like a Mac and use the AWN dock. A dock with integrated task and launcher items is really the way to go, at least for me.
User-installed Linux != manufacturer-installed Windows. Not what you were saying - directly - but its worth pointing out.
I have installed Ubuntu Linux on a number of clients computers, and I've done it properly. All set up to do common tasks (DVD movies, music, flash, WINE, etc) with proper remote support. These same clients have spread the word to the point where people from all over my continent are shipping me their laptops and desktops to have it installed with Ubuntu 'properly'. Kind of overwhelming actually.
My point is, vanilla Ubuntu needs some minor tweaks (software installed) before its completely ready for Joe Blogs, but once done - they love it.
Why does it have to be GNU/Linux anyway? Why not Linux/GNU?
Without Linux, GNU would be worthless so it's less important then linux. Hence people call it Linux.
What fixed that for you? I think you're missing an "I".
xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
Likewise with myself and fedora. I've put it on elderly peoples first computers and they have loved it.
It isn't a community developed distro, they accept outside help but the direction of the distro is set entirely by Shuttleworth
Which is a good thing, as the community is pretty much incapable to fix anything that would divert from the "standard" way of doing things. They want what they are used to and most of the time what they are used to is the ugly and complicated way to do things.
Just look at what happened when he moved the buttons to the left and the community protested. Did he care?
So you want people that are to stupid to type a single line into their terminal to call gconftool to change that stuff back to design your OS? The button order is a 100% total complete non-issue for anybody who has a little bit of a clue.
Not at all, the left side buttons are part of his plan to copy OSX.
Probably, but there are worse things to copy.
Shuttleworth talks about the contributions of others but doesn't use the word 'linux' once on the Ubuntu home page.
Linux is only a tiny part of the whole system, no need to plaster its name all around and create confusion. Don't you remember the "My Linux 6.0 is broken" posts from people who couldn't tell the difference between Linux and their Distribution? Beside, it is not like they hide it, its right there on their About page.
I don't really care what Shuttleworth has to say. A man who tries to poach developers off competing distributions has no credibility. Fuck Ubuntu, Canonical and their leeching practices. I'll stick with Red Hat and Debian, thank you very much.
-- Linux user #369862
He is spending millions of his OWN CASH developing a product that everybody can use for ABSOLUTELY FREE. Yea, must be an awful parasite this person.
On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
For example, it wouldn't play MP3s out of the box (ridiculous!) so I went to the OpenSUSE site and found a very lengthy and poorly formatted forum-style wiki on setting up non-free decoders. I tried several of the different options and none worked. So after hours of hunting I came across a blog walking me through adding the gstreamer back end for Phonon and all of the restricted codecs, which were in a separate Packman repo with a dubious cert. After about 8 hours and a couple reboots I was finally able to listen to MP3s.
I don't know what wiki you're referring to but the opensuse-community one couldn't be simpler (1-click install): http://opensuse-community.org/Restricted_Formats
This is the page linked to in the sticky post in the multimedia forum, the one people who ask about codecs in the forums are directed to and it is, or is linked from, the first 2 websites listed from a Google search for 'opensuse mp3 codec'.
(the opensuse-community.org wiki exists basically to serve up this page, and a handful of others, that can't go in the main opensuse.org wiki because of these legal issues)
Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
I think Ubuntu is a good player, if it comes to contributions to the community.
What we refer to as Linux, is made up of many tools around the Linux kernel. Here are just the informations I found on programs running on nearly every distribution
The biggest player in contributing to Linux kernel is still RedHat. Here are the top contributers:
Within that field, Red Hat topped that chart with 12%, followed by Intel with 8%, IBM and Novell with 6% each, and Oracle 3%.
Whereas the GNU (ls, pwd, sort, head, gcc, bash etc.) is done by the FSF (Free Software Foundation). Here is a list of contributors: GNU
If I put those programs together and make my own startscripts with e.g. init, systemd or whatever, I get a distribution. How close is Ubuntu to the actual version of the program in their distributions, which is necessary to contribute at all?
Here is an interesting statistic, how close distributions are with the upstream version: oswatershed.org
I believe the top distributions here are also the ones with the most upstream patches to get the used programs working.
When you are speaking about yourself in the first person, there is usually little need for the "I am", "I will", "I should" etc. It is implicit that you are talking about yourself.
Example.
Q. "Where are you going ?"
A. "To the mall"
There is absolutely no need to use the expanded "I am going to the mall". Unless you are six. How old are you by the way ?
Take out Linux or take out GNU -- what you're left with is not an operating system any more. Take out anything else, then what's left still defines an operating system. That's why it's most efficient to call it GNU/Linux, but, of course, you are free to call it whatever you want, as long as you're not being misleading. I don't think anyone has an objection to calling a system KDE/Xorg/GNU/Linux, if you have the stamina to type it then go ahead!
The difference between using two-part names and multi-part names is that every operating system needs to have a basic userland and a kernel, but all the other programs are purely optional. If a system doesn't have GNU, it will have something else in its place. Your home router will probably not be running GNU/Linux, but Busybox/Linux instead. Your phone will be running Android/Linux. The key point is that these are incompatible, different operating systems, and you will likely have problems if you want to run a program with particular system dependencies on all of these. Because this is free software, there are many possibilities of such pairs, such as FreeBSD/kFreeBSD, GNU/kFreeBSD, GNU/kSolaris, etc.
When you say "I run Linux", strictly speaking, you refer to all possible operating systems that run on the Linux kernel. Since you need a userland to make a full operating system, such a description is incomplete. And when someone asks you what system you're running, they're not asking about just the kernel, they want to know the whole thing. So *at minimum* you should say what kernel and userland it has. If you say "I run Linux" to mean "I run GNU with Linux", then, strictly speaking, you are being misleading, because Linux does not necessarily imply GNU, same as GNU does not imply Linux.
So, you see, it's not just about giving credit, it's also because Linux is not an operating system, and it's because us geeks want to communicate precisely.
Running user forums, bugfixing packages, and maintaining consistency are ungrateful jobs. I think many free software people somehow expected that society will recognise their efforts once the software gets mainstream. They see Mark Shuttleworth as the typical business guy who takes credit for all their work.
But there is a need for sustainable business models in many areas of FOSS development. If you look at the job market, most of the jobs are dead-ends for FOSS. I.e. you will use whatever free software is there but you will not get the permission to contribute back. Canonical is one of very few companies where a software developer can get a job without legal harassment by copyrights and non-disclosure "agreements".
I'm waiting for the day, where our biggest complaint is, that Canonical is helping customers migrate from Debian to Ubuntu. But at the moment there is bigger fish to fry.
FYI:
Firstly, GNU runs on other kernels than just Linux (FreeBSD and Solaris, among others). Doesn't that make Linux less important? Seriously, both parts are needed to make a full operating system, you can't have a bare kernel or userland.
Secondly, if you look at the "host triple" used to fully describe an operating system for the purpose of compiling C programs, you will notice that it's actually given in that order: arch-kernel-system, e.g. x86_64-linux-gnu, but that's not because of importance, it's because you take a "top-down" or "bottom-up" view. As far as software goes, the kernel is always at the bottom, and on top of it there is the core userland. GNU/Linux is just looking from the top down, because as a user, you normally interact directly with the userland part, not the kernel part.
gnu/linux is a richard stallman fantasy. Linus Torvalds came up with Linux he has naming rights he does not use "Gnu" anything.
He specifically thinks the gnu title is silly.
The ugly fact is Stallman and his buddies have been working on gnu/hurd for a decade with really nothing beyond
a 12 year old alpha to show for it.
http://www.topology.org/linux/lingl.html
http://xercestech.com/linux-not-gnulinux.geek
http://atulchitnis.net/writings/why-linux-and-not-gnulinux/
I'm now running Jaunty, and have been for probably the last four months, since the video card in my FreeBSD box died.
I give Jaunty credit for not pissing me off to the extent where I've been actively motivated to get rid of it, but that is about the most positive thing I can say for it. Pretty much all Ubuntu is good for is either listening to mp3s, maybe doing some scripting after making my own build of vim, and vegetating in front of Firefox. It's got even better since I wrote my own xsession and got back under Ratpoison.
If I try and do literally anything else however, frustration is usually the result. Multimedia editing in particular is virtually impossible in Linux, although that is not Shuttleworth's fault. The Ubuntu community also are not people who a sane individual would want to go anywhere near, but then again, that is also standard for Linux.
I have also always considered Debian to be one of the primary sources of emotional pain in my life, and it still underpins Ubuntu. Even doing something as fundamental as changing my $PATH is a source of frustration; I cannot find out where it is set. It is predictable that Debian's developers feel that /etc/profile is not good enough for them.
If you want to use Ubuntu, and you know what you are doing, follow the instructions here in order to avoid GNOME, ubuntu-desktop, pulseaudio, and associated eldritch horrors. Ubuntu's binary packaging is generally extremely dubious, but then again, FreeBSD is the only system where I've ever felt entirely comfortable installing pre-built binaries; quality binary packaging apparently does not exist for Linux at all.
Even if as many people used ubuntu as used suse, fedora, debian and mandriva combined (in your dreams, fanboi), ubuntu has way more complaints than all 4 put together, and this has been the case right from ubuntu's beginning.
Ubuntu has a market problem. They know it. This is why they've tried to branch out into cloud, netbook, whatever ... The problem is, they're poisoning the well, because people who are p*ssed off enough to search for any of the terms listed are unhappy users, and will return to the windows fold and say "iinux - I tried that crap."
Instead of marketing it as a desktop replacement for windows (in many cases, it's not), it should be marketed as a superior product for people who don't want the os to get in their way. It's not like Apple, for example, tries to sell their computers as a replacement for a Windows PC - they make it clear that it's not a Windows-compatible - it's better.
Yeah yeah yeah yeah. It is just that Linux, even together with GNU, is totaly fucking useless. You'd also need X.org and KDE/Enlightenment/XFCE or whatever and a shitload of other userland tools.
Given that KDE has a larger codebase than the entire GNU collection I would STFU if I were you and just go with "Linux" because when one says that everyone know what's up.
Don't get me wrong: the FSF and GNU is great, but not greater than the Linux kernel. Ever heard of Busybox? Gnu Core is totaly replaceable today with something else, so demanding GNU/ to be in the titel is fucking rude and totaly respectless of other projects. Call it the corruption fase of the free software revolution; *ME ME ME ME ME ME ME*
Here be signatures
It's in preparation for a bunch of status/indicator things on the right-hand side of the title bar. Their objective is to use those to replace the space-wasting status bar in applications (search Google for "windicators" for more information). That's an idea I can get behind, since vertical screen space is at a premium on laptops, and right now Firefox is wasting about 25-30 perfectly good pixels on a status bar that just displays the word "Done" on the bottom-left and shows the NoScript icon on the bottom-right.
The only reason I started using SUSE was because they were the only distribution where my wireless worked easily. The network manager works 99% of the time so you can manage the network settings from your desktop. However, yast lets you set up your network that 1% of the time you have problems.
I have also found OpenSUSE to have much better support for multiple monitors, or plugging external monitors or projectors into laptops. Much better then ubuntu, however it doesn't seem to utilize the s-video out on my laptops correctly.
Cheap storage VM.
So how will it be possible to drag a window that is too narrow to have blank space at the right side of the menubar? Or what about when someone wants to drag a window to the right, partially outside the edge of the screen?
alt+click+drag
So what your post is saying is that Ubuntu is not ready for just anyone to set up - which validates my proposition. I can give an opensuse dvd to someone and not have the same worries - installing the codecs, etc., is one click on a web page, then typing in the root password.
I can understand that poor people might be less likely to use Google, thus skewing the results. But I doubt there are large socioeconomic differences between users of various distros like there are between citizens of different countries and members of different religions. The problem is that more people use Ubuntu, so more people have problems with Ubuntu.
They are also the second-largest code contributor to Open Office, after Sun, who wrote StarOffice and then open-sourced it.
Redundancy is good And also good.
That crap was the straw that pushed me to FC13. I could deal with the bugs and technical problems (pulseaudio, I'm looking at you) because, hell, they happen. I managed to workaround most of the outdated software issues another poster mentioned above because, as misguided as the policy may be, I could see where they were coming from. But when they start dicking around with UI placement for no good reason whatsoever to be more like Apple, despite the fact that most users, power- and otherwise, are used to the old traditional right side alignment... AFAIC, that's not a mistake, it's an indication of a way of thinking that I expect to get worse with each subsequent release.
That was my point. There's not, contrary to the original comment.
You're kinda stretching here, confusing two usages. Which language was your first language? The answer in your post is a prepositional phrase, not a sentence. And if there is any implied subject it is because there is a direct question and context in which the subject is unambiguous. It is acceptable informal grammar, but not preferred.
Languages such as Japanese and Spanish have the implied subject rule for discrete sentences without any other context. "Walking to the subway" is a complete sentence which conveys "I am walking to the subway." In English that assumption does not exist without aditional context, and it is a fragment. You seem to have provided an example with context to prove a point about context-free grammar.
"Fixed that for you" does not by itself say who fixed it. The poster's sister might have corrected it, and yelled at the poster until he posted her correction. We know the poster, or at least the account the poster used, not the fixer. Poster could have pasted it into Google, which then replied with "Did you mean....?" with the corrected text, and Google fixed it. You can argue that the post included context, as in the person who posted was also the fixer. But that doesn't support your primary assertion. Outside of context, if you do not make it obvious through context that you are talking about your self, you can't invoke the "when talking about yourself" rule. People have to know you're talking about yourself first. Other languages do this, English does not.
"Left my wallet in El Segundo," is an example. Do you think the speaker left her wallet in El Segundo? You might think it's a reference to the song "I Left my wallet in El Segundo." Or if you're watching The Ladykillers, it becomes obvious later that Mrs. Munson is talking about that song, but The Sheriff does not know who left their wallet in El Segundo. Being unfamiliar with the song, a viewer might think that Mrs. Munson left her wallet, or that a neighborhood boy left her wallet. The context is intentionally ambiguous, a situation which could not have happened unless you were dead wrong about the implied self rule.
Vintermann is correct. And "There Fixed That For Ya!" was tongue in cheek, emphasizing the use of a trite phrase or meme.
I've been a professional developer for nearly 15 years, and before that I was developing as a hobby. I stopped using windows on my own computers shortly after windows 98 and started using slackware. It was fun, it was interesting and it appealed to me because I was able to dig into it and see how it worked, and then change the way it worked to suit my needs. The computer was mine personally once again. Over the years I tried various other distributions and particularly enjoyed gentoo as it allowed me to configure my entire software environment to squeeze every last bit of performance out of the aging hardware that I had. As the computer allowed me to do more and more of the things I wanted to do, I found more and more interesting little projects and became less interested in what the underlying software was doing.
When OSX came along I switched to a mac because the things I was doing seemed easier to do on a mac then they did on Linux, and numerous working environments had showed me that windows was still, at least to my mind, as horrific as it had always been. I don't want to say that osx is better than linux, or better than windows, or any of that nonsense (yes I know this is slashdot), because "better" is such a subjective thing. My personal computer is my "Personal" computer. It is there to allow me to work in the way that is best for me, not best for you, and certainly not best for Microsoft, whose software I still find to be completely counter-intuitive and proscriptive.
I pick the software that allows me to do what I want to do with the minimum amount of effort. When VMWare became available on OSX I thought it would be fantastic as I would finally be able to run linux on my mac alongside osx. Dual booting was too disruptive. I immediately installed my favourite distribution (gentoo) and was frustrated by how much technical knowledge I had to apply to get it working. During the course of configuring my virtual machine to suit my purposes, I scoured the internet for documentation and support with various problems and was amazed to find that most of the relevant documentation and support I need was provided by ubuntu. While I had no problem taking what the ubuntu docs said and applying it to gentoo, it was an extra step that I needed to take with absolutely no payout. I switched to Ubuntu.
What ubuntu does is allows me to get on with the stuff I need to get on with. The same could be said of any linux distribution, but ubuntu lowers the barrier of entry. Yes I could install Linux from Scratch, and have done in the past, but why bother when I just want to get my work done? Lots of my non-technical friends use Ubuntu, and thankfully they hardly ever bother to ask me any kind of technical support type questions as they are usually able to figure things out by themselves through the ubuntu forums. Which leaves both me and them with more time to get on with what we need to get on with.
Ubuntu would be nothing without debian which, in turn, would be nothing without GNU/Linux. Having better tools to do the job I need to do is far more important than who makes the tools, but if those tools come with clear documentation and fantastic support then even better. I don't want to spend my life hunched over a keyboard. The time I spend on a computer pays for me to spend time doing other much more interesting things, so anything that let me do my job easier is fine by me. Linux and the whole OSS ecosystem amazes me, but what Ubuntu have done is made it so much easier for anybody to benefit from that ecosystem, and consequently enriched the lives of everybody that uses it.
Thank you, Canonical, and thank you to the wider OS community. You really are changing the world for the better. Keep up the good work.
Karma: Bad. (As in Good?)
1) Admit that 9.10 was a broken release and just because Mark didn't see any "issues" on his very own laptop didn't mean tons of folks didn't have issues.
2) Apologize for foisting pulse-audio on us with a horrid config file in 8.04, right before you rushed it out the door (you always do this with LTS releases, you seem to be afraid of being stuck with something you don't like for 5 years). pulse-audio sucks all by itself for a lot of folks, but when you add in a config file that even the lead dev of pulse-audio says is completely broken, that is beyond the pale. Go ahead and try googling today for a solution, it's not simple and many of the threads conflict. You never did fix it and in fact in subsequent releases (I'm looking at you 9.10) managed to launch with a mostly working pulse-audio config and then messed it up during some stupid security update for a lot of machines (especially netbooks, like the Dell Mini 9, probably the most popular Linux netbook on the market). I almost forgive you for tying the earliest pulse-audio packages to a scary sounding package named ubuntu-desktop (which was a meta-package that you could actually safely remove, but you wouldn't know that from the name) since you stopped doing it later, but I'm still abit annoyed about that one as well.
For what it's worth I do use several versions of Ubuntu. I use Debian too. I recall RPM dependency hell all too well to really love Redhat and its children (I know RPM dependency hell is now in the past, but it was a really big pain for a lot of us). I do think you guys are doing a good job generally, but you have got to lose the "We can do no wrong!" attitude, it sucks, especially when you guys do screw up (we all screw up at times). Also, get your Paper-cuts initiative working again, this was the single, best idea you guys have had in 2 years and you let it die as far as I can tell (and perhaps I'm wrong and it's really going full steam ahead, but it doesn't seem to be).
I'll tell you what needs to happen. All these grateful and passionate Users need to band together and organize a conference.
Once that happens, invite all the Developers to 'come down from their cloud' to visit and participate in this conference.
The list of workshops you'll want to develop will include 'The life of a Bug; From Discovery to Patch', 'Version Control for Laypeople', and a three parter on 'How Open Source Works'.
Get off your cloud? How about 'get off your duff'?
Just like Shuttleworth started Canonical to address userspace conditions, someone needs to get going on the meatspace support structure. Even older than your xfree86.conf file are the arguments 'Devs don't understand Users' and 'Sales doesn't understand Engineering'.
Now, how about stepping up to the plate?
> So what your post is saying is that Ubuntu is not ready for just anyone to set up - which validates my
> proposition. I can give an opensuse dvd to someone and not have the same worries - installing the codecs,
> etc., is one click on a web page, then typing in the root password.
No. You're simply drinking your own cool-aid and trying to call it champagne.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
...this is one area where Ubuntu is dropping the ball badly.
It seems like they could do a MUCH better job of aggregating bug reports and relaying them to upstream projects.
By now they should have a nice little info-graphic that can tell you where all the rough parts in Linux are.
You should be able to feed your stuff into an old-Suse style hardware compatability database and have it spit out all of the potential problems.
If you should avoid Asus P55 boards, then Mark should be able to tell you.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
SUN DID NOT WRITE STAR OFFICE!
Sun BOUGHT Star Division. Star Division wrote Star Office.
Sun came in after the little company from Germany spent 10+ years building the product and trying to be "out there" competing against Goliath.
Sun just came along later and threw money around.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
Who says you can't be both?
Use a compiler to check the spelling in your programs.
Use a dictionary to check the spelling in your posts.
I don't understand how you can be in programming (where every character counts) and not be good at spelling. I don't understand how you can be a developer or designer and not be good at grammar and other language rules. There are patterns to both.
When I retire from being a developer and architect, I'll give the Great American novel a go. I, for one, can get both sorts of spelling right. And English isn't my first language. Go figure.
Now get off my lawn.
Hah! I love it. In the midst of singing the praises of Ubuntu I throw a small shout out to OpenSUSE and everybody responds to the latter. Wonderful. OpenSUSE in the last few years has been just marvelous, and I'm not alone in thinking this, apparently. SUSE is great.
I stand corrected.
Redundancy is good And also good.
Actually, some of us our English majors. I have a BS and MS in English Education and the MS includes a concentration on Educational Technology. Don't leave us English folk out just because ...
Run this in terminal to get the old layout.
gconftool-2 --type string --set /apps/metacity/general/button_layout "menu:minimize,maximize,close"
You can also use gconf-editor.
Sadly some idiot at GNOME decided that the "interface" tab in Appearance properties was redundant and removed it, so there's no simple way to do it from the GUI.
Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.