Slashdot Mirror


Laptop Heat May Cause 'Toasted Skin Syndrome'

mrvook submitted an item that might affect a lot of you "Working with a laptop on one's lap for extended periods of time has been found to cause heat damage and skin discoloration in a handful of cases, prompting researchers examining the phenomenon to recommend thermal protection for laptop users and warnings labels on laptop device packaging." Only 10 cases have actually been reported, so this might just be a case of media hyping something, or it could be the end of the world with a generation of nerds doomed to sterility and crunchy crotches.

195 comments

  1. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...a generation of nerds doomed to sterility..."

    Are we really worried about nerds being sterile?

    1. Re:Really? by uncanny · · Score: 1

      While direct impregnation may not be likely, they could always donate it, and hopefully help out the gene pool a little. I prefer it when idiots try to imitate certain TV shows and repeatedly nail themselves (some times literally) in the crotch. Maybe a "one laptop per idiot" program should be started?

    2. Re:Really? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not actually the nerds that are getting sterilized.. It's the hot blonds that are. Geeks and Nerds are anal enough to not use the laptop in a un-optimal position, I.E. on the lap. Therefore they seek out a table or other surface. Or they get "clever" and design a lap support platform that lifts the "lap" top to proper typing height.

      Dumb blonds and others that really know very little about proper computer use, leave the thing on their lap and don't have the neurons to communicate "Ow this is hot, get it off me" from their groin area to their brain...

      Most of the time it's mis-read as "I'm hungry" or "I have to pee"

      IT's these creatures, specifically the MBA or Marketing genus line of these creatures we are looking to protect. They are the ones that need the warnings on Toasters that say not to use in the bathtub, or curling irons that say "do not insert into any orifice"... Which is too vague, most of these creatures dont understand the word orifice, and think it's a type of Spanish dessert.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you should be, a world with out nerds!!! who the hell you gonna get to fix yours??????

    4. Re:Really? by angiasaa · · Score: 1

      "...a generation of nerds doomed to sterility..."

      Are we really worried about nerds being sterile?

      Yes we are. Look at the planet!

      If history has taught us anything, it's that reproduction is the be-all and end-all of all evolution.
      Give the planet a lack of nerd babies, and we'll be left with a planet that's good to look at, but dumb as hell!

      In the planet of the future, the one eyed geek is king!

      --
      Geekism is your _only_ God!
    5. Re:Really? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      I have/had this. The design on my laptop(a Dell...and NEVER again) is such that all the air exiting is then redirected by the laptop screen and a large portion of it is directed toward my left leg. What doesn't hit my leg usually heats up the screen such that it's incredibly uncomfortable to touch to my skin.

      I have a brown area above my knee that you can clearly see the vent grating pattern. Only last night had I considered suing Dell for the damage I have but most of it has gone away compared to a few months ago.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    6. Re:Really? by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      I have a Dell branded space heater as well (A Vostro 3700). Cooling pads are available all over the place. Not only do they solve this issue, but they'll keep your laptop better protected from heat as well.

    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, actually.

    8. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we really worried about people stupid enough to let a laptop slow-cook their legs? This is a flashback to that idiot hot coffee lady. Except this is much much worse...

    9. Re:Really? by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      "...a generation of nerds doomed to sterility..."

      Are we really worried about nerds being sterile?

      Yes we are. Look at the planet!

      If history has taught us anything, it's that reproduction is the be-all and end-all of all evolution.
      Give the planet a lack of nerd babies, and we'll be left with a planet that's good to look at, but dumb as hell!

      Whoosh!

      A steril nerd will reproduce just as effectively as non-steril nerd: Not at all, since it involves actually getting laid.

    10. Re:Really? by hnangelo · · Score: 1

      Since a few days ago I have exactly the same issue with my Dell laptop. Really stupid design...

    11. Re:Really? by John+Q+Dallas · · Score: 0

      Most people just stop B4 they go blind.

  2. In other news by dane23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists prove that heat makes things hot and should be avoided when you don't want things to be, you know, hot.

    --


    Warning! Keep Out of Eyes! Wash Out with Water! Don't Drink Soap! Dilute! Dilute!
    1. Re:In other news by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      "Fire is indeed hot!"

  3. A new feature for the i5 by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only 10 cases have actually been reported, so this might just be a case of media hyping something, or it could be the end of the world with a generation of nerds doomed to sterility and crunchy crotches.

    Cool a laptop that is not only powerful, but also eliminates the need for trimming and birth control. Ladies will start looking at the nerd carrying the laptop in a whole new light... ;P

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    1. Re:A new feature for the i5 by somersault · · Score: 1

      I read stories like this years ago. Some laptops do get uncomfortably warm.. guess what, if it's uncomfortable rather than just nice and toasty, you should probably not be placing it directly on your lap! Taking the pain will just lead to damage.

      However if there are issues simply from extended periods of being nicely toasty, that definitely isn't good, and people do need to be warned.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:A new feature for the i5 by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that it's painful. I come from a family with poor pain sensitivity and I've literally broken bones without knowing it.

      I'm guessing with numbers that small that it's either not possible or that we're dealing with a group that doesn't really feel the pain. In either case, I'm not sure what can really be done about it.

    3. Re:A new feature for the i5 by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're assuming that it's painful. I come from a family with poor pain sensitivity and I've literally broken bones without knowing it.

      This is probably why there's only 10 cases of it. You need quite the combination of events to get it.

      1. A particularly hot laptop
      2. Somebody with high pain tolerance or something wrong with their heat senses*.
      3. A particular dedication towards working on their laptop, on their lap, for a continous and extended period of time

      I've used my computer on my lap a few times, and it does get warm. But I shift around, get up and get a drink or snack, visit the bathroom, etc...

      *There's also the boiling frog scenario - toss a frog into boiling water he'll try to jump out. Put a frog in cold water and slowly warm it to boiling he won't. Some research says this is legend, some says it's true as long as you're really, really gradual. Me? I wonder if it also depends on the frog. Anyways - there are probably people less likely to notice being slow cooked than flash burned.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:A new feature for the i5 by jorgevillalobos · · Score: 1

      *There's also the boiling frog scenario - toss a frog into boiling water he'll try to jump out. Put a frog in cold water and slowly warm it to boiling he won't. Some research says this is legend, some says it's true as long as you're really, really gradual. Me? I wonder if it also depends on the frog. Anyways - there are probably people less likely to notice being slow cooked than flash burned.

      The "boiling frog" meme is just an urban legend.

      I agree with everything else you said, though.

    5. Re:A new feature for the i5 by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      However if there are issues simply from extended periods of being nicely toasty, that definitely isn't good, and people do need to be warned.

      Yes, that's precisely what TFA says it is:

      The condition is sometimes called "toasted skin syndrome," and is commonly seen among elderly patients that use heating pads for prolonged periods. The consequences of the condition have a small chance of being serious.

      Prolonged exposure to being "toasty" can cause a blotchy rash, and if exposure continues, it can result in permanent thinning of the skin in those areas, leading to lesions and sores. These sores can become cancerous. This isn't caused by repeated burns, just by being very toasty warm for a long time. You can also get the same thing from overuse of a hot-tub.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    6. Re:A new feature for the i5 by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything else you said, though.

      Actually, I think that if you reread the middle of what you quoted there, you'll find that you agree even with that statement. Specifically - Some research says this is legend, some says it's true as long as you're really, really gradual.

      Different researchers getting different results is nothing new.

      Oh, and a coworker suggesting a 4th requirement/indicator -
      4. working without clothing between the laptop and the skin.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:A new feature for the i5 by bughunter · · Score: 2, Informative

      However if there are issues simply from extended periods of being nicely toasty, that definitely isn't good

      No, it isn't. And it doesn't even have to be "toasty" -- shortly after acquiring my 2006 Macbook Pro, I developed a case of Tinia cruris that defied treatment with Desenex and Tinactin.

      You can see where this is going. It took a trip to the doctor's office and the question to be posed, "did you recently acquire a laptop computer?" before I realized the association.

      Yes, Macbooks cause crotch rot. Swamp nuts. Rack rash. The itch. Taint thrush.

      Laptop users, take my advice, and go buy a paperstone cutting board. Works great, weighs little, and fits in your laptop bag.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    8. Re:A new feature for the i5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies will start looking at the nerd carrying the laptop in a whole new light... ;P

      No they won't. They will still see nerds as ugly, unpleasant, and a complete turn-off.

      Yeah I know, "woosh" and all that.

    9. Re:A new feature for the i5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Some laptops do get uncomfortably warm.. guess what, if it's uncomfortable rather than just nice and toasty, you should probably not be placing it directly on your lap!

      Sure, but even without actually cooking the skin, some of my hot laptops have caused the skin on the top of my legs to become tender and sensitive, and my wife actually burned (skin peeled off) a very sensitive part of her body.

    10. Re:A new feature for the i5 by inanet · · Score: 1

      I know a couple of hardcore* WoW players who would litterally sit there with the laptop scalding their leg, rather than move it and risk messing up their pvp battle.

      I'm sure its the case with other games as well, and people will shift to a more comfortable position when the opportunity arises (such as getting fragged).

      As it is small temperature differences can make a massive difference in sperm count.

      but don't worry, you'll usually make more!

      *some of them have been cured of the habit now. thankfully.

      --
      "This is my Sig. there are many like it but this one is mine."
  4. Huh? by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it that we as a society feel we need to put warning labels on things for the dumbest of society? If they can't move a hot laptop off their lap, do we really expect them to read a warning label?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ow! Your stupid warning label reflected sunlight into my eyes! See you in court jerk!

    2. Re:Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ow! Your stupid warning label reflected sunlight into my eyes! See you in court jerk!

      Oh, sorry. The warning label has fine print that says do not look at label in direct sunlight. You're on your own.

      And, remember ... do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Huh? by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      LMAO!

    4. Re:Huh? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of intelligence, it's a matter of sensitivity to pain. There's a lot of warning labels that are there for stupid people, but there's also a lot of them which are there for a small minority that needs them. Take those warnings for people with nut allergies. Most of the things those are on don't have nuts in them officially, they were just processed in the same facility or on the same equipment. You're not going to know that there's possible contamination without the warning.

      Likewise, you can't be expected to know when to stop doing something if it doesn't hurt. You're assuming that these people were hurting and that they kept it up, but that might not be true. With the kind of numbers cited, you could very easily be dealing with individuals with pain insensitivity.

    5. Re:Huh? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> The warning label has fine print that says do not look at label in direct sunlight.

      Argk! I only read Albizanian! See you in court too!

    6. Re:Huh? by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      I see your point also. But is the manufacturer supposed to put labels on everything for every possible cause that might happen. The point I was trying to make, and I seem to have not made it so I apologize. Is we cannot blame the manufacturer if the user does not use common sense. Door pinch fingers, area rugs trip, knives cut, stoves burn, etc. Maybe I'm missing the point. I think of a laptop as a computer that needs a fan to keep cool for a reason and take steps so it doesn't rest on my lap. i don't wait until it burns. Perhaps others can be responsible and be proactive...maybe not.

    7. Re:Huh? by zero_out · · Score: 1

      I think the problems are that the damage can happen at only 120 F, and laptops don't spike from ambient temperature to 120 F instantly. 120 F isn't all that hot, and if you warm it slowly, well, we all know the fable about boiling frogs.

    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not look at warning label with remaining eye.

    9. Re:Huh? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Why is it that we as a society feel we need to put warning labels on things for the dumbest of society?

      "We as a society" generally don't. Most warning labels aren't specifically mandated by social consensus. (Even those that are mandated by government are often mandated by regulatory bodies heavily influenced by the regulated industry as part of a package that includes limits on liability if the rules are complied with.)

      The people putting the warning labels do so, because warning labels are very cheap, whereas lawsuits over injury or wrongful death are expensive to fight, and have the risk of very large damage awards, so the minimal cost associated with a warning label is seen as worthwhile by manufacturers if there is an expectation that it will reduce the risk of any of (1) consumers engaging in usage patterns that result in injuries, (2) lawsuits being filed if the injury occurs, and/or (3) large awards if a lawsuit is filed.

    10. Re:Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Argk! I only read Albizanian! See you in court too!

      Sorry, the EULA for the warning label says you agree that all labels are written only in English and that it is your responsibility to find a suitable translation of one is required.

      By looking at the warning label, you agreed. ;-)

      How else can we give you excellent service today?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:Huh? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> How else can we give you excellent service today?

      Do you have any glare warning labels written in braille?

    12. Re:Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Do you have any glare warning labels written in braille?

      They're "on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of The Leopard".'" as I understand.

      Down the hall, to your left. Mind the steps.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:Huh? by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      True. But then isn't this just sad? I mean I understand that companies put labels on their stuff to avoid lawsuits and injury, but I'm commenting on the "need" to do so. The joke I heard that a paparazzi cameraman got hit when he was hounding a celebrity sued not the celebrity or the restaurant but NIKON. I mean, there should have been a label that warned him of upset Hollywood celebrities being violent if they have the strobe go off 500 times a minute.

    14. Re:Huh? by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Did you know that prolonged used of an electric blanket, hot water bottle, or a hot tub could cause a permanent blotchy rash that can become cancerous? No? I guess that makes you "the dumbest of society" then. This isn't about burns from a very hot laptop, it's about a chronic skin condition caused by a comfortably warm laptop. But I guess you can't really expect the dumbest of society to RTFA.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    15. Re:Huh? by human-cyborg · · Score: 1

      Serves you right for leaving the basement!

    16. Re:Huh? by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      So if we were to follow that logic we must have a warning label on every single product for every conceivable misuse of it? My point wasn't that is causes an issue, rather it was that we don't need a label to warn us that the laptop is warm or in some cases hot. Would you advocate putting a "warning item may be hot" on everything that could conceivably be hot? And yes, I do know that extended use of something artificially made hot laid on your skin is not good. Now sit down, shut up and color.

    17. Re:Huh? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Why is it that we as a society feel we need to put warning labels on things for the dumbest of society?

      Mostly because of liability in court, which is not the worst thing in the world. Yes it's absurd for that woman to sue for spilling hot coffee, but there are going to be abuses no matter what. I'd rather companies have to warn people even about obvious dangers than companies getting away with hiding less obvious dangers.

      Anyway, there are always legitimate situations where it's good to have a warning that you consider obvious. One that comes to mind here is people who can't feel properly. If you can't feel pain, or are paralyzed and have no sensation below your waist, you might not realize your laptop is burning your legs until either you smelled cooking flesh or your realized you had infected burns a few days later. Whether a warning is an effective way of preventing that, I don't know. Probably a better solution for everyone than laptop manufacturers getting sued, people in wheelchairs getting burns and/or infections, or hamfisted legislation limiting how much power laptops can have.

    18. Re:Huh? by Americano · · Score: 1

      It's not a question of "burning" and "feeling pain but ignoring it." It's a condition that arises from long-term exposure to and close contact with a heat source - Erythema ab Igne.

      It's uncommon because most people don't sit for hours at a time day in and day out with a hot laptop resting on their legs, but the condition (which is most frequently seen in elderly people who use heating pads & space heaters to stay warm) carries with it an increased risk of cancer as a result, and this is why the study is suggesting that a warning might be beneficial.

    19. Re:Huh? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Why is it that we as a society feel we need to put warning labels on things for the dumbest of society?

      Because civil suit outcomes and damages are determined by jurors, who are the lowest common denominator themselves.

    20. Re:Huh? by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

      What, are you suggesting you are against the following label?

      WARNING: HOT THINGS IN YOUR LAP MAY HEAT YOUR LAP.

    21. Re:Huh? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      >> The warning label has fine print that says do not look at label in direct sunlight.

      Argk! I only read Albizanian! See you in court too!

      And that's why when you do warranty laptop work for HP, if you have to replace a part with a warning sticker on it they send you a little sheet of stickers in fifteen different languages (well, fourteen - there's two English ones, one in the tone of "It's a bad idea to do this." and one in the tone of "IT'S NOT OUR FAULT IF YOU DO THIS.") and you have to apply the correct sticker(s) for your area.

    22. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the United States is well on its way to becoming a nanny state. You know, think of the children and all. The sad thing is I work with a group of people who would burn to death if the building caught on fire because they couldn't decide which door to use as an exit. These same people suffer from a serious lack of common sense and can't even make it to work without a GPS. I'm not joking about this, they are really that pathetic. That's what happens when you make sure everything in life is soft and gentle. Nothing changes without some pain, whether it's being scalded by a hot laptop or being told you're not the brightest student in class.

  5. I just look at it as voluntary sterilization by hsmith · · Score: 1

    My woman can save $50 a month on birth control thanks to my laptop!

    1. Re:I just look at it as voluntary sterilization by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My woman can save $50 a month on birth control thanks to my laptop!

      I think I'd rather get a vasectomy than slowly bake/burn/scorch my parts, thank you.

      But, I admire your enthusiasm. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:I just look at it as voluntary sterilization by somersault · · Score: 1

      Except the pill has positive benefits outside of just birth control, so she'd probably want to keep taking it anyway?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:I just look at it as voluntary sterilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And quite a truckload of negative effects, too...

    4. Re:I just look at it as voluntary sterilization by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but none so frustrating as a week of debilitating "stomach cramps" every month like my last gf had whenever she was off the pill, she could barely do anything when she was like that.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:I just look at it as voluntary sterilization by box4831 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, a internet-enabled, programmable crotch oven sounds more enjoyable than waving a knife around down there. But thats just me

      --
      Miller Lite tastes like water that's somehow managed to rot.
    6. Re:I just look at it as voluntary sterilization by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I dunno, a internet-enabled, programmable crotch oven sounds more enjoyable than waving a knife around down there. But thats just me

      I trust that the doctor is going to be a little more precise than "waving a knife around down there", and is actually going to know what he's looking for.

      I'm betting the results of the vasectomy are a lot more repeatable and precise than the "crotch oven". I'm betting that has fairly inconsistent results and some more side effects than you'd really like -- but, hey, feel free to choose. They're your parts afterall. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Warning labels suck by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please no more warning labels. They are applied in non-removable paint on my car visor, my child's safety seat, and other rather annoying places.

    Why the hell do I as a driver need to be warned about the dangers of... well I don't know what dangers they are warning me about anymore because they are so damned ubiquitous. Removable stickers are fine. Resale of the item means they won't have the warning? Make a website http://warnings.gov/

    You go there, pull your product type from a dropdown list and it will have every warning you could possibly want to have on your product, all there in a singular location and available in any language you want, updated instantly.

    Oddly enough, I think it was Jay Leno (could be wrong) complaining about how car manuals are nothing but 80 pages of warnings rather than content which you could use to operate/repair your vehicle. Please please please, no more warning labels. I've become immune and now only see them as a bright yellow stain on my upholstry.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    1. Re:Warning labels suck by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. We need warning labels on things that are really harmful. There is a difference between something that is harmful if you drink 2 liters of it and something where 5 drops can kill you, but warning labels often lack this important difference. Warning labels don't help society but rather harms them because no one will read the label because they expect it to be all stupid things so people ignore things that are really dangerous.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Warning labels suck by natehoy · · Score: 1

      only see them as a bright yellow stain on my upholstery.

      "Do you suffer from the horror of WLAS (Warning Label Anxiety Syndrome)? Ask your doctor if Labeloffitall is right for you. Labeloffitall is the first prescription medicine that can actually make excess warning labels invisible to the naked eye! WARNING: Labeloffitall is not right for everyone. If you start seeing bright yellow stains on your upholstery, you may be actually suffering from a urinary tract infection. See your doctor immediately if you suffer from runaway libido, as this may lead to sex and pregnancy, a serious medical condition, especially in men. [pause] Labeloffitall, your label-free future is waiting for you!"

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:Warning labels suck by somersault · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's that odd if it was Jay Leno complaining about car manuals, seeing as he's a massive car nut :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Warning labels suck by Brewmeister_Z · · Score: 1

      If you are smart (or at least concerned) enough to read a manual or know how to look up the correct warnings for your product on a website, then you are not the target audience for most warning labels. Also, most warning labels are probably at a reading level too advanced for the people who need it.

      --
      I Cater to the Needs of Stupid People. - from a coffee mug Christmas gift
    5. Re:Warning labels suck by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I think it was Jay Leno (could be wrong) complaining about how car manuals are nothing but 80 pages of warnings rather than content which you could use to operate/repair your vehicle.

      I don't see why this would be odd, anybody who has read a car magazine in the last decade or so has probably read an article by or about Jay Leno - he's a huge car buff with a huge car collection, and as far as I know prefers to work on his cars himself. He is exactly the kind of person who would despise warning labels all over his beautiful cars.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    6. Re:Warning labels suck by maxume · · Score: 1

      Why did you get yourself upholstered?

      Seems strange to me.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Warning labels suck by magarity · · Score: 1

      Jay Leno complaining about car manuals, seeing as he's a massive car nut
       
      Any car he would collect is too old to be full of warning labels. Those are for modern people who can't look after themselves.

    8. Re:Warning labels suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO, we need more government warnings.

      GOVERNMENT WARNING: Warning! Left to themselves, governments can become extremely dangerous. Please contact your elected representatives regarding the issues that concern you the most.

    9. Re:Warning labels suck by natehoy · · Score: 1

      The upholstery company forgot to put the "warning: not for use on humans" label on.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    10. Re:Warning labels suck by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Exactly. We need warning labels on things that are really harmful. There is a difference between something that is harmful if you drink 2 liters of it and something where 5 drops can kill you, but warning labels often lack this important difference. Warning labels don't help society but rather harms them because no one will read the label because they expect it to be all stupid things so people ignore things that are really dangerous.

      Someone once said that the sum of human intelligence is a constant, and in general, people are idiots. Whereas most of us go through life knowing that touching a hot stove will burn us and we should never do it, there exists a growing population that sees that as an instant jackpot. Touch stove, get burned, sue! Then do it again and sue! Lather, rinse, repeat.

      Alas, the rate these people die out isn't enough to clean the gene pool. Then again, the lure of free money probably just pollutes it again.

      And you know the laptop warning sticker (which already exist on some laptops - one of mine says "PC base will beocme hot during use") will lead to lap-detecting devices in laptop tat automatically shut down if they detect the laptop getting too hot and on a lap...

    11. Re:Warning labels suck by somersault · · Score: 1

      According to this partial list he has at least 10 vehicles made after 2000.. he's not a "classic car" nut, he's just a car nut, or should I say a vehicle nut. The only vehicle I knew for sure that he had before today was a Y2K superbike, and I'm guessing that has some warning labels considering the exhaust can melt the bumpers right off of cars..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Warning labels suck by Syberz · · Score: 1

      Warning labels also screws up darwinism.

      We should remove the warning labels off of everything and let the weaker members of the herd remove themselves from the gene pool in spectacular fashion.

      --
      ~Syberz
    13. Re:Warning labels suck by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Why did you get yourself upholstered?

      Seems strange to me.

      Ever try to run long distances commando-style? Fabric which can supply some Up Holding is a godsend.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    14. Re:Warning labels suck by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      WARNING: Rants about warnings can cause a state of raised blood pressure, which could lead to stroke or even death.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    15. Re:Warning labels suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah fantastic idea:

      I get a new tool, decide to go look up your website, only to get a warning not to leave the damn thing unattended :P

      Some warnings need to be put on there so they can be seen immediately. You don't need a warning that an electric heater is going to get hot - but you don't was us to remove stuff like "This way up" on boxes do you?

  7. Testicular cancer by ylikone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My cousin blames his testicular cancer on a decade of using a laptop resting over his crotch. Even though cancer does not run in his family (or mine) and I don't think I believe the laptop is to blame, it could be that it aggravated it.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Testicular cancer by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My cousin blames his testicular cancer on ...

      Or maybe, he just didn't jack off enough?

    2. Re:Testicular cancer by AntEater · · Score: 1

      I'd be more likely to blame the wi-fi transmitter than heat from the laptop.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    3. Re:Testicular cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarantee that laptops have nothing to do with testicular cancer. Millions of young men use laptops every day and never get testicular cancer, and there isn't a significant uptick in the prevalence of testicular cancer that coincides with the widespread adoption of laptops.

    4. Re:Testicular cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is because most people aren't stupid enough to cook their balls with their laptop on a regular basis. Has anyone done a study just looking at the men who regularly use their laptop on their laps?

    5. Re:Testicular cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe, he just didn't jack off enough?

      Testicular cancer - take this! No risks for me.

  8. Mobile Internet is not yet ubiquitous by tepples · · Score: 1

    http://warnings.gov/

    You go there

    If it requires Internet access at the point of warning, then there would still need to be a fallback warning label for people who have dumbphone service for $80/yr instead of smartphone service for $800/yr.

  9. Should have called it... by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

    My nuts are on fire but facebook still won't load syndrome. Really, we're going to have a new medical condition caused by stupid user tricks. If you suffer from this you should remember to remove the laptop when your lap gets hot. That is all.

    --
    Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
    1. Re:Should have called it... by Americano · · Score: 1

      There is a name for the condition this causes: Erythema ab Igne, which increases your risk of developing a malignant squamous cell carcinoma.

      Amazing that science has words for all these things which 2 minutes of reading TFA might have informed you of.

      I guess it's people like you who can't be arsed to RTFA that the warning labels are designed for. Go figure.

    2. Re:Should have called it... by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

      I guess it's people like you who can't be arsed to RTFA that the warning labels are designed for. Go figure.

      I read the article. Then I made a snarky comment. It was kinda funny but not really funny. Hence the need to include a warning label in my comments for people like you that can't be arsed to develop a sense of humor. Go figure.

      --
      Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
    3. Re:Should have called it... by Americano · · Score: 1

      It was kinda funny but not really funny.

      So, your inability to be funny somehow puts my sense of humor in question?

      Usually the cart goes behind the horse, friend.

    4. Re:Should have called it... by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

      /facepalm *sigh* Thank you for so eloquently proving my point. If you didn't think my comment was funny, but now acknowledge it was an attempt (not a good attempt according to your analysis), shouldn't you go back and retract your original reply? Oh, right.

      --
      Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
    5. Re:Should have called it... by Americano · · Score: 1

      Why would I? You said your comment was supposed to be funny, and then hastened to point out that it wasn't really. And then you slagged *my* sense of humor because you failed at being funny. Perhaps you should go back and retract your original statement and replace it with something that is funny instead?

      My sense of humor is quite operational - it lets me know when somebody is being funny. Unfortunately for you, it also fails to activate when somebody is not funny.

    6. Re:Should have called it... by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

      Ok, thanks for the feedback. I'll now modify my inadequacies to suit your superior ideals. BTW, that was sarcasm. And you win 3 interwebs. Spend them wisely.

      --
      Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
    7. Re:Should have called it... by Americano · · Score: 1

      Stop crying. Take your lumps when you're not funny, instead of bitching that other people lack a sense of humor.

      The whole point was it's not a "new medical condition caused by stupid user tricks." It's a known medical condition being caused by an unexpected source - like if kids started developing scurvy because their schools only gave them milk, or office workers began developing black lung from sitting too close to a closet full of toner cartridges.

    8. Re:Should have called it... by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

      Dude, take your forumrage meds and a deep breath. You can't really have it both ways. You either accuse me of not RTFA or of not being funny. You don't get to do both. Ok? That's fair I think. I said my original comment WAS funny, just not that funny. Shades of grey, not black and white. And now you can go back to yelling at kids to get off your lawn.

      --
      Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
  10. The real interesting part of this article by Adkins1984 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "He recognized that the laptop got hot on the left side; however, regardless of that, he did not change its position," the report says. I think we found the problem. Why say your kid is dumb when you can blame his laptop that he never puts down?

    1. Re:The real interesting part of this article by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      "He recognized that the laptop got hot on the left side; however, regardless of that, he did not change its position," the report says. I think we found the problem. Why say your kid is dumb when you can blame his laptop that he never puts down?

      I think the point is that a laptop can be hot, but not to the point of pain, and still cause damage over time. That's not necessarily intuitive.

      Intuitive = If it's not hot enough to cause acute pain, then it's OK to leave there all the time.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    2. Re:The real interesting part of this article by timkar · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of cattle that come in contact with electric fences and cook themselves (or parts) 'cause they're the haven't the sense to respond to basic pain/discomfort stimuli.

    3. Re:The real interesting part of this article by countSudoku() · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thank you! I'll be subscribing to your newsletter shortly. I found it odd that people still use laptops in their laps! I mean handhelds and smartphones are the new laptops, the laptops are the new desktops, and desktops are the new home servers. Eventually augmented reality glasses will replace the handheld, then minions of nanobots. Laptop in his lap?! What a dope!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  11. TFA! by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    This concerns CHILDREN. The report was from a pediatrics journal and involved kids. As TFA points out, kids' skin is more sensitive to heat than adults, and parents need to be aware of this.

    1. Re:TFA! by oldhack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oooh, clever, pulling out the "think of the children!"

      Screw those pests.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:TFA! by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Heat makes things hot. Most kids figure this out by the time they're old enough to be using laptops.

    3. Re:TFA! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Should we now install warning labels on bottled water stating that it's wet?

      There's a reason most companies that make laptops started renaming them "notebooks", because you shouldn't keep the damned things on your lap. They get hot. People have been burned by them. That doesn't mean we need to add yet another warning label to the sea of ignored little red and yellow stickers already covering every product you buy.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:TFA! by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but a warning label? Really? How about if you are old enough to use a laptop then you are old enough to know when something on your lap is too hot. Lets make sure we put labels on shoes saying "left foot" and "right foot" else how will a child know they might be causing damage to their feet? My old man was a product safety engineer for IBM and you simply can't put warning labels on everything to cover the stupidity of others. He told me some whoppers of what people will do and then blame the manufacturer for not putting on a label saying "don't do that you moron!"

    5. Re:TFA! by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      There's a reason most companies that make laptops started renaming them "notebooks", because you shouldn't keep the damned things on your lap.

      Do it right. Put them on your lap, but closer to your knees rather than to your crotch.

      Oh, and wear long trousers (or pijamas), not shorts. Not (only) because of the heat, but rather because the fan will otherwise suck in the hair you've got on your legs, and this generates a very weird feeling...

      That doesn't mean we need to add yet another warning label to the sea of ignored little red and yellow stickers already covering every product you buy.

      A, that's what this "Windows" sticker is... a warning label!

    6. Re:TFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, my kid just barely can play on the computer (his games involve pushing the letter g and hearing/seeing something related to 'g, giraffe begins with g') but he will tell me about all sorts of things that are hot, fire, stove, ovens, pizza, water, etc.

      This should be a non-issue for pretty much 99.99% of the population (ie those that feel pain with heat).

    7. Re:TFA! by zero_out · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that "children" also includes 17-year old drivers, with part-time jobs, who socialize with their friends via Facebook, using a laptop their school provided, while lounging in bed. These children also fall into the category of pediatric medicine.

    8. Re:TFA! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      But they can be really handy. When my now-grown kids were little and I was in the grocery store with them, every woman in the place would walk up and talk to me. I remember thinking "I wish I'd have had some of these when I was single."

      Now that I'm single again I wish my kids would make me a grandpa so I could take the ankle-biting rugrats to the store and get laid by a better class of woman...

    9. Re:TFA! by houghi · · Score: 1

      Wait till they find out terrorists hand out those computers to children with copyrighted material on it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:TFA! by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      What are people doing to get their laptops so hot? Gaming or compiling, yes, but if you're just checking email or something like that, I don't see why a laptop would get warm enough to cause a problem. I have my laptop on my lap right now, and not too warm at all.

      And my genes won't get into the gene pool anyway.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    11. Re:TFA! by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Get a dog, dirty ole man.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    12. Re:TFA! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Once laptops started including DVD players, some people started watching movies on them. This results in keeping the machine going for around 90 minutes to two hours, with the added heat from the DVD being continuously on (and usually the screen brightness being as high as possible). while entering the same hypnogogic state as any other movie watching. Just as that brilliant student of human behavior William Cosby pointed out how common it is for your arm to go to sleep when you put it around your girl's shoulder at the movies and leave it there for two and a half hours, so it is with excessively warm laps.
                This is not obvious to most people on Slashdot, as they tend to a) play games, which results in a more active mental state where they still notice minor discomforts from their physical environment, or b) they only watch a movie for 2 minutes and c) can't put the player on their lap for that kind of movie anyway.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    13. Re:TFA! by daq+man · · Score: 1

      One of my kids actually had this. He had been wearing jeans most of the winter and spring so we didn't see his legs until the outdoor pool opened in summer. He had this discoloured patch on one leg. We took him to the doctor who couldn't figure it out. Then we realized that was exactly the spot where he'd been putting his laptop for hours on end while playing WoW. Took him back to the doctor, who agreed that it was probably caused by heat and gave us some cream etc. Now he sits with a laptop cooler under the laptop and it hasn't happened since.

    14. Re:TFA! by Americano · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with heating the skin to the point where it is painful. We're not talking about burns.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erythema_ab_igne

      This is the condition under discussion, and what it boils down to is that people don't realize that they're doing damage to their skin because they are not feeling "burned," they are feeling "warm" - but even that, not uncomfortably so.

      Long-term exposure to heat damages the skin in a way that makes it more prone to developing squamous cell carcinoma - it's not about burns and pain, it's about "doing this to your skin could result in an increase in your prospects for malignant skin cancer."

    15. Re:TFA! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A, that's what this "Windows" sticker is... a warning label!

      "Intel Inside!"

    16. Re:TFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he do that? He just got rid of one--it's why he's single again!

    17. Re:TFA! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You can't take a dog in the grocery store (or anywhere else there are likely to be unattached women) unless you're blind.

    18. Re:TFA! by couchslug · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Screw those pests."

      Pedobear, it that you?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  12. Um... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Only 10 cases have actually been reported, so this might just be a case of media hyping something, or it could be the end of the world with a generation of nerds doomed to sterility and crunchy crotches.

    I'm trying to look for the downside in all of this.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  13. A more accurate headline by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More accurate would be "LAPTOP USE ON BARE SKIN MAY CAUSE TEMPORARY BLOTCHY THIGHS", but that wouldn't grab people's attention as much.

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    1. Re:A more accurate headline by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not very accurate. It doesn't require bare skin, it's permanent not temporary, and it's not just a blotchy rash, it's a blotchy rash that can form weeping skin lesions and sores, and can become cancerous.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:A more accurate headline by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      That's not very accurate. It doesn't require bare skin, it's permanent not temporary, and it's not just a blotchy rash, it's a blotchy rash that can form weeping skin lesions and sores, and can become cancerous.

      [Citation needed]

      Not one source I've seen has said that. The most damning I've seen talks about 'a small statistical risk' of a skin tumour developing after 30 years of continued heat exposure. The rash only gains any permenance if someone utterly ignores it and continues repeatedly exposing the area involved to heat over a long period.

      Lets not take things from a sensible level ("if a hot laptop is giving you a rash, stop putting it on your lap") to a ridiculous level ("using a laptop will give you cancer").

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  14. Barbecue! by Foundling · · Score: 1

    I usually put the sauce on the side. Since these are laptop users we're talking about, I'll assume that the rub is taken care of.

  15. Science? by snookerhog · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't think "heat makes things hot" really qualifies this as a Science article.

    put it in Idle where it belongs

    1. Re:Science? by Sirusjr · · Score: 1

      Also who uses laptops on their lap for extended periods of time really? I always use my laptop at a desk like it should be.

    2. Re:Science? by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Er if the laptop is on idle it probably isn't hot enough to cause the problem. I think you're missing the point here...

    3. Re:Science? by snookerhog · · Score: 1

      touche

  16. I'm surprised this is just now getting an article by Sedated2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I often like to sit on my couch to use my laptop at home. It's the most convenient to cross my legs with the laptop sitting on top. I have had burns on my leg from the laptop's heat. It heated up slowly enough that I didn't notice until there was a full burn. I know I am not nearly the first one to have this problem. Isn't this the reason in 2000-2002 they were switching to the name "Notebook" instead of "Laptop"?

  17. toasted skin syndrome? by OglinTatas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because "weenie roast" is too gender-specific

    1. Re:toasted skin syndrome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always add roast beef curtains to the list.

  18. Life imitating art by jr0dy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe this explains the events which transpired in the film "Children of Men". :)

    --
    I heart anarcho-capitalism.
    1. Re:Life imitating art by Monkey_Genius · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      I've got your sig, right here.
  19. Stoves by rakuen · · Score: 1

    So did these 10 people never learn not to touch the stove while it's on? I mean, that's the measuring stick we use for high heat leading to bad outcomes, right?

    1. Re:Stoves by zero_out · · Score: 1

      So did these 10 people never learn not to touch the stove while it's on? I mean, that's the measuring stick we use for high heat leading to bad outcomes, right?

      I guess you've never heard of sensory adaptation? Or perhaps the boiling frog phenomenon?

    2. Re:Stoves by Americano · · Score: 1

      I doubt he's heard of any of them, since apparently he only reads the headline, with a passing glance at the summary.

      In other words, just the sort of person that warning labels are designed for.

  20. In other news... by bemymonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...putting your hand in a toaster also causes Toasted Skin Syndrome.

    Who woulda thunk it? :(

  21. Extremely old news, maybe 20,000 years old by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My parents said this used to happen to them when they were kids.

    They grew up in houses that were heated by coal fireplaces - they would sit too close to the fire for too long and the same thing would happen. The cure - stop putting your skin too close to heat sources.

    Seriously, I think people have known about this since the discovery of how to make a fire. We just forgot about it for the last 50 years while we all enjoyed our modern heating systems that distribute heat more evenly.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Extremely old news, maybe 20,000 years old by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, fifty year old heating systems distributed heat more evenly than modern systems. Back in the '30s-'40s they had "gravity furnaces". There was no blower; convection distributed the heat, which was controlled by an electrical thermostat that varied the furnace's flame. If the power went out because an ice storm took down the electrical wires, you still had heat, because the furnace wasn't connected to the house's electricity. Its thermostat's electricity was generated by a walnut-sized doohickey called a "power pile" that generated electricity from the flame of the pilot light.

      I had one in the old house I raised my kids in in the '90s. I loved it, it was way better tech than we have today. Especially when the power went out.

    2. Re:Extremely old news, maybe 20,000 years old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no blower; convection distributed the heat, which was controlled by an electrical thermostat that varied the furnace's flame.

      I'm confused - how exactly do you heat your house that doesn't involve convection? In my house we have central heating via radiators (big metal things with hot water pumped through them), that heat up the room via convection, and this is pretty standard in every flat/house I've been in (except one very crappy flat that was converted from a stock-room - all it had was electric grills on one wall in each room). The 'blower' part you mention is what throws me - does your heating work like air con?

    3. Re:Extremely old news, maybe 20,000 years old by swilly · · Score: 1

      Based on your use of the word flat instead of apartment, I assume you are from the UK. I've lived in Germany when I was younger and I remember the houses all using radiators. Burnt myself real bad when I first arrived by leaning on one. (It was sitting out in the open in the middle of a store, and I didn't even see it until too late.) However, on this side of the pond we usually blow hot air through ducts instead.

      Gas furnaces are the most common (especially in the northern US) because they are both cheap and efficient. Wood stoves are usually used to heat water or to supplement the heat generated from a furnace. They are also common in older houses up north. Heat pumps and other electric heaters are more often used in the southern states. Many apartments here in the Arizona don't have any gas for fire prevention reasons, so electric heat is used instead. Electric heat is less efficient than gas, but I actually run my AC more in the winter, so it doesn't really matter how efficient (or inefficient) an electric heater is.

    4. Re:Extremely old news, maybe 20,000 years old by adolf · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      I grew up in a house built before 1903 (which was the earliest date we ever found). Originally, it must have distributed gas or wood stoves, and been converted to central heat sometime later (one of the original brick chimneys was repurposed as plenum).

      For most of my childhood, we had a giant gravity coal furnace which had been converted to natural gas, along with a weak (and optional) circulation fan. It mostly resembled a huge, upside-down octopus: A giant round thing, covered in asbestos, with 6 or 8" ducts running off in all directions.

      When there was a huge blizzard that left folks without power for a week or two, that old codger was a real treat: Even though the thermostat needed power, the gas valve permitted the burner to be turned on and off manually. And since the ductwork was still set up for a gravity feed, it worked just fine without the fan.

      However, that was later replaced by a much more modern natural gas furnace of reasonable efficiency for the time (85%, IIRC). It had a proper fan that circulate air circulate air with some force. This eliminated cold spots in the house, as well as the use of various kerosene and electric space heaters, even though almost all of the ductwork remained exactly the same (all of the easily-accessed asbestos-wrapped ducts were replaced at this time, but everything else stayed).

      I remember this transition very well: It was nice being warm at night in the winter, for a change, without the drone of a space heater or the worry and bother about kerosene.

      And while it certainly didn't do a damned thing during a blackout, the money saved during the heating season would easily have easily have bought a small generator with which to power it...or in more modern times, an inverter. Or a solar panel and some batteries. Or...

      Sometimes, the old days are gone for a reason.

    5. Re:Extremely old news, maybe 20,000 years old by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, the one I had (your description fits it perfectly, except it had a power pile to run the thermostat) kept the whole house evenly heated. Maybe it was because it was a smaller house, or better insulated. The house I live in now is about the same size, with a modern (>1995) furnace, but the house gets gets too chilly and the furnace comes on, then it's too warm for a while.

      But I'll agree, a solar panel would be far better than a power pile.

    6. Re:Extremely old news, maybe 20,000 years old by adolf · · Score: 1

      I had a problem like that in the first house that I bought.

      I learned how to adjust the anticipator in the thermostat, and things were instantly better.

      YMMV.

  22. Bathe the affected area in honey water. by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next, remove the skin, placing it on a mandarin crepe that has been spread with a teaspoon of hoisin sauce. Top with a sprig of green onion, then fold/roll into a burrito style package.

    Serve, pairing with a reisling, dry Chardonnay or a white Bordeaux.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Bathe the affected area in honey water. by box4831 · · Score: 1
      Heres an American variation of the recipe for us yanks:
      • Mash skin into nugget shapes and cover in vegetable oil, butter, and mayonnaise.
      • Wrap bacon around each nugget and arrange haphazardly onto a low-quality paper plate.
      • Microwave uncovered for 3.5 minutes. The splattering adds flavor.
      • Serve with leftover hot sauce packets from Taco Bell and enjoy with a lukewarm Diet Coke.
      --
      Miller Lite tastes like water that's somehow managed to rot.
    2. Re:Bathe the affected area in honey water. by rgviza · · Score: 1

      I'd rather just put it on my egg and cheese bagel. I'm a man of simple taste.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    3. Re:Bathe the affected area in honey water. by Americano · · Score: 1

      No no no. Everybody knows that human flesh goes best with fava beans. And a nice chianti.

  23. i guess there will be less ambiguity then by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    ...since laptop from now on will be reserved only to one usage.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  24. iPad by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    (In hysteric Apple fanboy voice) Another epic win for teh iPad! Apple designed it such that it doesn't roast your balls!

    (Your wife may of course decide to roast them after you show her the bill.)

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:iPad by TheMidget · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Your wife may of course decide to roast them after you show her the bill.)

      Your husband. It's an Apple product after all...

  25. That's why they don't call them laptops. by chemicaldave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Specifically referring to my horrendously flawed 1st generation 13" Macbook. Because of the heat generated it was marketed as a "notebook" and even comes with warnings against using it on your lap per the user guide. This has led to many a warm-lap, a melted "mag-safe" power cord, and just recently caused one of the plastic screw holes for the heatsink to actually shatter during use.

    1. Re:That's why they don't call them laptops. by straponego · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, my first gen Macbook Pro, aka Bruce Cockburn, was pretty bad too. The generation after that is also unusable as a laptop. Add to that the constant high pitched whining sound and random kernel panics Apple never acknowledged (but which went away with a software update a year later), and I've seen enough that I'll never buy Apple hardware again. They don't care if it works as long as it looks pretty.

    2. Re:That's why they don't call them laptops. by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If there's one thing I don't like about Apple's mobile products it's their unwavering desire to shrink the enclosure thickness by bare millimeters with each new generation, without really compensating for reduced ability to dissipate heat.

      I mean, would it have killed them to at least add vents to the sides of their notebooks? A single vent area can't suck in cool air and expel hot air well; if nothing else some of the hot air gets sucked right back in. And the vent's already half-blocked by the screen hinge!

      Heat dissipation through the keyboard and palmrest also sucks--my palms have broken into heat-induced hives a few times, and the "don't put on lap" edict can't be adapted--what am I supposed to do, not use the keyboard and trackpad when I'm on the road!?

    3. Re:That's why they don't call them laptops. by RManning · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this is a case of YMMV. I have a year old 15" MacBook Pro and it's only ever been uncomfortably warm a few times. I write software on it at least 10 to 15 hours a day, so it's not for lack of use.

  26. Significant that the kid was playing games by catbutt · · Score: 1

    They didn't mention this, but laptops can get WAY hotter when doing things like playing games, compared to more general use. Just something to consider.

  27. Re:I'm surprised this is just now getting an artic by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Possibly, I do remember a long time ago, there was talk about laptops being a known risk for sterility in men. Which wasn't really a shock at the time. The reason why the Balzac hangs out there more or less unprotected is that the equipment is heat sensitive. And needs to be a bit below core temperature. Consequently it wasn't terribly shocking that a device that routinely operates above body temperature and sits on the lap might have some impact on male fertility.

  28. notebooks, not laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's why they are called notebooks, not laptops. However if you choose to use your notebook on your lap, they make many fine products to prevent "toasted skin syndrome" like this one from targus. http://reviews.cnet.com/cooling/targus-awe55us-lap-chill/4505-9990_7-33772538.html

    What gets me is Im an uneducated nobody who knows this is just stupid people being stupid and these so called highly educated news reporters actually air this crap on the news like its something important.

  29. Re:I'm surprised this is just now getting an artic by shogun · · Score: 1

    The reason why the Balzac hangs out there more or less unprotected is that the equipment is heat sensitive.

    I thought it hung out half an hour north of Calgary.

  30. "toasted skin syndrome"? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Back in the day, we called it a "burn".

    1. Re:"toasted skin syndrome"? by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, we'd take the hot electronics off our lap as soon as we felt discomfort.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  31. ...really? TOASTED?... **Face Palm** by emccann · · Score: 1

    There HAS to be some medical term for the condition too. "toasted skin syndrome" is what reporters get for passing off things they made up as medical terminology... And they make laptop coolers and pads for a reason... Maybe because they're hot? I hear touching hot things is bad.

    1. Re:...really? TOASTED?... **Face Palm** by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      There is a medical term. "Burn".

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    2. Re:...really? TOASTED?... **Face Palm** by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Erythema ab igne.

  32. Software is the real problem by linebackn · · Score: 1

    The real problem is people insisting on using bloated inefficient software, which of course requires more electricity to run and produces more heat.

    If modern operating systems and software were better optimized most people could get along fine with low power, low heat netbooks.

    As it is, people seem to be happy to pump more and more electricity through their desktops and powered laptops until they are just a few watts short of tripping their circuit breaker. Just to write a letter.

    1. Re:Software is the real problem by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      As it is, people seem to be happy to pump more and more electricity through their desktops and powered laptops until they are just a few watts short of tripping their circuit breaker. Just to write a letter.

      How many people write letters anymore? I'd tend to think that the heat increases tend to come more from attempting to make real time rendering more and more realistic.

      For just writing a letter, computer energy usage is probably lower than it has been in a decade. Using a 'gaming machine' probably does cost a tad more juice, but if you're not running games on it it's not using nearly as much electricity as it would be otherwise.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Software is the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is people insisting on using bloated inefficient software, which of course requires more electricity to run and produces more heat.

      If modern operating systems and software were better optimized most people could get along fine with low power, low heat netbooks.

      As it is, people seem to be happy to pump more and more electricity through their desktops and powered laptops until they are just a few watts short of tripping their circuit breaker. Just to write a letter.

      Add to that, websites that run scripts which cause your computer to run your CPU at high rates, thus using more electricity and generating more heat.

      My local newspaper's website does this, and I often have many pages from that site open at once. Before I started using NoScript and Ad Blocker Plus, my CPU rate would skyrocket when I opened any of these pages.

      I haven't measured, but I have a feeling running that running Firefox with NoScript and Ad Blocker plus actually reduces my electric bill. I know my system fans don' run as hard when these scripts are blocked.

      As far as the machines being overly powerful, I, personally, am looking into building a low power system, possibly built around a Beagleboard XM, so I won't have to run a more powerful (energy hog) machine as often.
      --
      codk

  33. Hot things can burn you by Kenoli · · Score: 1

    What is this, preschool?

  34. Media hyping, ya think? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Only 10 cases have actually been reported, so this might just be a case of media hyping something, or it could be the end of the world with a generation of nerds doomed to sterility and crunchy crotches.

    Well the article says 10 cases since 2004. In my estimation, that's easily tens of millions of users. You are more likely win the daily lottery in some states. And this can be avoided by not putting it on your lap for extended periods.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  35. Well, it's not quite as slam-dunk as some believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually suffered from this. My laptop definitely got warm enough to grab my attention, but not so hot that I felt that it was burning. After a few weeks, I noticed a strange red splotchiness on my legs and it really was alarming at first. It's not like you pound yourself with a hammer and wonder why you have bruises, or burn yourself with an iron and wonder why you get blisters, it's much more subtle than that. After a day or so, I figured that it was the laptop and a couple of days of not using the laptop on my lap got rid of the symptoms.

    So now, if it's going to be on my lap, I will sit cross-legged and rest only the edges on my legs, leaving an air-gap under most of the bottom.

  36. They're not "laptops" by aclarke · · Score: 1

    Back around 2000 I had a Sony VAIO (never again). I had to call tech support for another reason, and while I was on the phone, complained that my new laptop got so hot that it burned my legs when I was wearing shorts.

    The person's response was, "They're not laptops, sir. They are notebook computers." Evidently the manufacturers' response too their "laptops" getting to hot was to conveniently rename them.

    1. Re:They're not "laptops" by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I thought "laptops" were the older portable computers which were still somewhat large and heavy, but could fit in your lap? And notebooks were the machines that came later which were lighter and more portable, and they needed a term that fit their smaller size?

      For instance, this would be a laptop: http://www.microstar.net/museum/cpqslt286.jpg

      And pretty much *all* of today's computers would classify as notebooks.

    2. Re:They're not "laptops" by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Something with a nineteen inch widescreen isn't 'portable' by much of a margin. Could you imagine a reporter taking notes on a pad of paper that size?

    3. Re:They're not "laptops" by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I still call them "laptops", but it didn't take me very long to conclude that that really wasn't a very good name for them, even if they were the right size to fit there.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  37. Whoever decided to call by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    them "lap-tops"?

    They're portable computers. You don't have to put them on your lap.

    Who decided to call the device by the portion of the body that some people choose to (awkwardly) place it on?

    Do people call babies "armtops"?
    Watches "wristtops"?
    Glasses "ear/nose-tops"?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Whoever decided to call by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you mean ankle-biters, male jewelry and four-eyes?

    2. Re:Whoever decided to call by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Do people call babies "armtops"?

      No, but small dogs are commonly called lap dogs.

      Watches "wristtops"?

      "Wrist watches" actually.

      Glasses "ear/nose-tops"?

      Do you mean eyeglasses?
      Or we also have have a particular style called pince-nez, which is french for "pinch nose".
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pince-nez

      Still feeling smug?

    3. Re:Whoever decided to call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can call me yourmom-top.

    4. Re:Whoever decided to call by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      I thought we said to not let the facts stand in the way of a nice argument. You cut it out and let the parent continue his rant, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
  38. Toasty Laptop by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Well I have a quite toasty laptop that has a desktop CPU (i7 960) three hard drives and 6 GB of RAM so it's interesting info to me. However I don't put it on my lap because to do so would block the three cooling fans. I use a laptop cooler between my lap and the machine.

    Maybe people should start using these to protect their family jewels?

    1. Re:Toasty Laptop by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      Why the hell did you buy that? There's no way it's portable, the screen probably has poor color rendition, and I suspect you could have gotten a desktop with 30% more oomph for the same price. Who even builds a laptop with three hard disks?

    2. Re:Toasty Laptop by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I disagree that it is not portable. It weighs about 15 lbs and fits in a large laptop bag that I can easily transport in my car. Yes I wouldn't want to try air travel with it but well I don't.

      The screen is 1900x1200. While the colors aren't as good as a nice IPS screen I don't use it for anything critical along those lines.

      It's made by Sager, and yes it isn't cheap but I have the money and don't plan to take it with me.

      http://www.gophn.com/sager-np9280-clevo-d900f-review-the-new-undisputed-worlds-fastest-notebook/

  39. THAT's what that smell is. by rgviza · · Score: 1

    All this time I thought my neighbors cooked a shit-load of bacon every day. Speaking of which, I'm hungry...

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  40. Darwin by PPH · · Score: 1

    This is just another example of natural selection at work. Too stupid to take something hot off your lap? Get out of the gene pool!

    Granted, this is like getting a sunburn or the canonical frog in the simmering pot. Sure, you'll get scorch marks the first time. But that's why we learn from our mistakes. Lacking that ability is reason enough to have your nards permanently roasted.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  41. This probably rarely gets reported, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and probably only by overprotective parents. For example, this happened to me, but I didn't go running to the doctor saying "Oh, no, the skin on my left thigh is reddish and it's worse when I use my laptop!" Instead, I had the good common sense to buy a $10 lap desk so my laptop wouldn't come into direct contact with my leg, and the redness went away on its own after a week or two. Also, I bet there are many other adults who come up with similar solutions if they notice this is a problem for themselves or their child, or don't have sensitive enough skin for it to be a problem, or live in climates where they're wearing jeans 90% of the time, or just don't care that they seem to have a permanent reddish area on their thigh(s)...

    Only, unfortunately, my reproductive cells are stored too far inside and too far away from my thighs for this to cause sterility... oh, well, I can probably still sell them for enough to pay for my PhD.

  42. Re:Well, it's not quite as slam-dunk as some belie by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 0

    My laptop definitely got warm enough to grab my attention...

    I always thought we knew that heat on skin is bad. Whether are not you are in pain. Guess I was wrong all these years...

    --
    <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
  43. OK, I admit it... by SpekkioMofW · · Score: 1

    ...I've toasted my legs with my laptop. That's why I use a laptop desk (laptopdesk.net). I'm not schilling for them - just stating what I use. And in my defense, my laptop battery did bloat, which might have had something to do with it. And I've also noticed that my girlfriend's MacBook Pro dissipates heat a lot better than my MacBook.

    --
    Spekkio Master of War
  44. Not in the UK, for most anyway by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Actually, fifty year old heating systems distributed heat more evenly than modern systems. Back in the '30s-'40s they had "gravity furnaces". There was no blower; convection distributed the heat, which was controlled by an electrical thermostat that varied the furnace's flame. If the power went out because an ice storm took down the electrical wires, you still had heat, because the furnace wasn't connected to the house's electricity. Its thermostat's electricity was generated by a walnut-sized doohickey called a "power pile" that generated electricity from the flame of the pilot light.

    I had one in the old house I raised my kids in in the '90s. I loved it, it was way better tech than we have today. Especially when the power went out.

    Yes, I've seen diagrams of the old systems that were available in the USA.

    I think only rich people in the UK would have had these systems in their homes in the 1930s and 40s though.

    My parents' parents' houses were exactly like the house featured in the 1900 House. Central heating would have been a dream for them. Their hot water came from a "back boiler" which was a cast iron thing installed into the back of one of the fireplaces. They had to be careful to open the taps if it got too hot as there was the danger of a steam explosion.

    Heck, my Mother's childhood room still had a gas light in it.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Not in the UK, for most anyway by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The house I had would have been a lower-middle class house, it was a small two bedroom (circa 1930-1945) and the furnace had been converted from coal to gas gravity. The house we moved to in 2000 was built in 1918 and it had gas lamp fittings but no gaslights; it was certainly a rich person's house when built (hardwood everywhere, bay windows, deacon's bench, fancy woodwork). It originally had a gravity furnace (and fireplace; I miss my fireplace) but the furnace had been replaced with a modern furnace with blowers.

      I can imagine how futuristic that house must have seemed in 1918, gas AND electric! It still had some of the original wiring. The basement was almost like a museum of electrical house wiring, with all sorts of upgrades over the years.

  45. Cooling fans by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

    This may be obvious, but if your laptop is especially hot, you might want to open it up and clean out the fan, if you haven't done it for a while.

    --
    "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
  46. Nerd sterility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would notice?

  47. Rmclock by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    If you have anything OLDER than an Intel i3, (ie. something between Pentium M and Core 2 duo) you can install Rmclock and lower the voltage of your laptop, so it makes less heat. You can no longer undervolt the newest laptops.

  48. hot CPUs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hence why it is a bit silly to put anything hotter than a 25w CPU into a laptop. I much prefer the low-voltage ones at 10w or less (quieter cooling fans and longer battery life also)

  49. Re:I'm surprised this is just now getting an artic by bdleonard · · Score: 1

    I don't think Balzac hangs out much of anywhere these days.

  50. Eau, Really? by conureman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I suppose there might be some easy money in a lawsuit, but did you ever consider dealing with the issue yourself? I'm too cheap to buy a fancy plastic lap protector, so I use a paver block from my yard to protect my lap from the heat.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    1. Re:Eau, Really? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did consider dealing with it myself, and I did, however I was already experiencing the worst of the problem long before I discovered what was actually causing it(you should note, I knew all about this about a year ago..this is all old news to me at this point). This isn't something where you think the thing is hot to the touch and it burns you, it's just a bit extra warm for long enough to tan your skin.

      You see, it doesn't start out sauteing you, it starts out with some red marks that look like the vent gratings, so the first thing I figured was that the gratings were leaning against my leg causing it to get red from the pressure, and I dealt with that. When it turned brown a month later then I knew that it was definitely a heat issue, and I began to deal with that. After discovering that the screen's edge was the hottest of the bunch, I realize exactly what was failing in the design and I dealt with that.

      That said, they still damaged my body due to their shitty design and I think they should do something about that. A replacement laptop of my choice would be cheap to them and acceptable to me, though I doubt I'll actually do anything unless I hear that there is a class action lawsuit involved. So don't think that I'm one of those who jump on an issue just because there's money in suing; that I definitely am not but I've learned in the past that if you don't act in time, you could lose all hope of getting any compensation(I have back problems that will never be paid for by the person who caused them due to this..so I'm well aware of how that works).

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  51. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the heat in my house and all the houses I have lived in (except for an apartment, which used radiators) work work "like air con". The heat and the AC come into my house via the same duct work. One house used a heat pump, the other used gas.

  52. Someone STOP the madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another sticker in my laptop? No way!

  53. Tards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/chive-best-tues-21.jpg?w=500&h=488

  54. Apple design by zenyu · · Score: 1

    The "don't run any programs or the thing will overheat and die" bug still exists in the latest MacBook Pro's. I have a couple month old one that's the bane of my existence at the moment. (I needed it to make sure some code was compatible with FCP.) That thing is always demanding to be rebooted for an update of some sort, it heats up like crazy and dies when you do anything processor intensive, and the UI has so little polish that KDE shines like a 1950's presidential motorcade by comparison.

    After using it for a couple months I thought about how Apple designed printer paper might look like. 10" on each side, $10 a sheet, razor sharp edges, both sides covered in fingerprint preserving plastic. One side would carry a large warning about not putting it in a laser printer as it would melt and destroy the printer, while the other would be filled with warnings about avoiding paper-cuts.

    Jobs would send a tweet about how all paper can give you a paper-cut.

  55. Great Balls of Fire! by khelms · · Score: 1

    nc

  56. Fried egg syndrome by Cur8or · · Score: 0

    Check if you have speckled eggs. Use a mirror if you find comfort in food.

    --
    Winkey shortcut mapping for 64bit windows. WinKeyPlus