Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Live Enforcement — No Swastika Logo

itwbennett writes "It's one of those questions that really should never come up, but as blogger Peter Smith points out, Stephen Toulouse, the head of Xbox Live enforcement, is used to fielding all sorts of strange questions. Recently, one of those questions was apparently 'Can I use a Swastika as my logo in Call of Duty: Black Ops?' When Toulouse responded with the obvious answer ('No, of course you can't, we'll ban you.') he was met with some pushback by people he refers to as 'contrarians' and 'internet pundits' who decided to educate him on the long and storied history of the swastika as a symbol of good fortune and how just because the Nazis used it, it doesn't make the symbol itself a bad thing. Toulouse covers the topic on his blog in a post titled Context and it's an interesting read if for no other reason than to get a peek inside the day-to-day issues the Xbox Live Enforcement team deals with."

473 comments

  1. Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by metrix007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The guys tone seems to be that he knows best and that his view is commonly held, and that the people arguing are only doing so for the sole purpose of arguing.

    I don't think that's true at all, and while a company certainly has no obligation to assure free speech to all customers of its service, I would expect it to at least be considered, especially when the arguments have a lot of merit.

    I mean, if his point is that they won't allow things commonly found horribly offensive then he should have simply stated that, without diminishing the people making the argument. All in all, he comes across like a tool.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    1. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Malc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Believe it not (and apparently you don't), his view is normal and commonly held. People arguing in this way for something like the use of swastikas tend to be immature or lying about their motives. There's nothing cool about swastikas, even for Hindus (it's a sacred symbol after all).

    2. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To quote Stephen's blog in response: "They’ve read an article that’s contrarian to some position widely held, or they’ve found some obscure fact that contradicts common interpretation. Some of them claim to have known it as innate fact, others claim it to be widespread common knowledge taught to every single person in elementary school.Of course, usually neither is true at all. Most of them are just contrarians." I find that a perfectly reasonable argument to make. I've heard and indeed stated myself that the swastika by itself is meaningless, however I know that the context that almost any reasonable person would take it in is as a Nazi symbol. He appears to have considered the argument on it's merits as you've asked, so where's the problem?

    3. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't you mean that you don't think that there's anything cool about swastikas? Other people might disagree.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    4. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by ranulf · · Score: 0
      I agree. There's nothing cool about swastikas. However, that's not really the issue here.

      The problem is that Microsoft approved a game for release that allows people to use the swastika as a logo. If they find that so objectionable that it's an automatic Xbox Live ban for the player, then the simple fact of the matter is that they should have rejected the release until the logo was removed from the game. The requirements on a game's release are incredibly strict, and Microsoft has an entire team of people looking for issues like this in game. If they missed it, it's Microsoft's problem, not whichever gamer decides to use it as a logo.

    5. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by MareLooke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For most people the thing that makes them "cool" is exactly the same thing why they are banned on Xbox Live (and in half of Europe): their link to the Nazis.

    6. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 5, Insightful

      His view is commonly held. The people who are arguing, most likely, are only doing so for the sole purpose of arguing. I can't say whether he "knows best" as a general principle, but it's a good call. And an obvious one.

      When's the last time you heard the word "swastika" and didn't immediately think about its role in Nazi Germany? Here's my stream-of-consciousness: "NAZIS! HITLER! WORLD WAR II! DEATH CAMPS!" and then, if I think about it a little longer, I might think, "Hindu mythology? Wait, was that Hindu or something else? Maybe Sikh? I don't think that's really a Sikh thing...they've got the turbans but I'm not sure what else...what other religions are there in India? Jainism? No, that's not right...it's not the Buddhists, I don't think...must be Hindu. Doesn't it point the other way, though? Do they do it both ways? I should check out the Wikipedia article. Maybe I should look up Sikhism, too."

      When's the last time you saw a swastika in a movie or a flier or a tattoo or a T-shirt, and it wasn't this bad boy or a reference to it?

      These people live in the same universe as we do; it's merely a matter of being contrarian, and a video game (correction: this video game, I won't speak for all possible video games) is not really an appropriate platform for reclaiming the symbol.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    7. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Believe it not (and apparently you don't), his view is normal and commonly held."

      Normal, sure. Commonly held? Prove it.

      All we have at this point is you saying "it's not commonly held" and someone else saying "yes it is." I don't care how many stories you have or how many people you've talked to, the plural of "anecdote" is not "evidence". So unless you can point to a study, I'm not taking your word for it.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    8. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by DavoMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      its a game where people are shooting each other in the face. if someone is going around shooting people in the face and then sees a swastika on their back, and thinks 'that is SO wrong!' then I think they have their head in their ass.

      somebody has to be the bad guy. its a war game. hell, what about wolfenstein enemy territory? its always axis versus allies.

      the only person to cause any kind of conflict is the admin who is being pedantic about a logo on the player model of someone who is there to be shot at. shouldn't it be encouraged? lots of people would want to shoot nazis.

      pathetic.

      --
      Whats the harm in yelling 'Computer, end program!'? You could be living in Star Trek! Go on.. give it a try.
    9. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Twisted+Willie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you read TFA? His issue is not with a swastika appearing in the game itself, it's with the swastika appearing in a publicly accessible Xbox Live profile. Without any context whatsoever.

    10. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ? Cross shapes in and of themselves are pretty cool despite being used as the symbol of Christianity, and the swastika shape itself is cool, despite being used by the Nazis. If people can think shuriken make cool symbols, why do you find it so hard to believe that they might like a swastika simply for the shape?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by spynode · · Score: 1

      Actually I think swastikas are pretty cool. They where used on weapons and armory by ancient Latvian warriors and also used as a Latvians Air Force logo from 1918-1940. It was symbol for sun and good fortune. Unfortunately Nazis ruined the coolness factor and now it is a global taboo. I really think it is unfair. To people like you this symbol means only horrors of WW2 but there are millions of people around the world who have one more reason to hate Nazis - they abducted swastika and never gave it back.

    12. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Prove it? Its banned in most of Europe.

      Unless your Hindi or ancient Egyption, you have nothing to stand on for using that symbol.

      It was bastardized by the Nazis well before anyone currently bitching about it was born. So for all intents and purposes, its a Nazi symbol.

    13. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by metrix007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is his dismissive attitude of the other side as simply being contrarians.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    14. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, the plural of anecdote is evidence.
       
      The debate is on how many anecdotes are required to be convincing; the mathematical realm of statistics deals exclusively with figuring out how many of these anecdotes are needed. I mean, what do you think a study is except for a whole bunch of individual stories about a real event... one of which -is- the definition of anecdote?

    15. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by .tekrox · · Score: 1

      Because of the generally perceived political ideology it once represented.

      Regardless of what one person perceives as 'cool' the majority of Western, Middle Eastern, African and minority Asian society is going to perceive its fascist Nazi origins.
      Whilst this perception exists use of this image shall be in bad taste; if you want change - then change the perception of the image.

    16. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps people should learn not to jump to conclusions?
      I don't think the Swastika is cool, and I admit when I see one my first thought is "Nazi". But before I act on that thought I pause to think a bit, because I think that's just a wise thing to do. If the context of the Swastika I see is clearly not related to Nazism, I don't care. If the context is not clear (could be related to Nazism or it could not be) then I give it the benefit of the doubt and I don't draw a conclusion. Finally, if the Swastika I just saw is related to Nazism (for example, the Swastika is black, inside a white circle which is itself inside a red background - i.e. the Nazis emblem), I just think "That guy is an idiot" and I leave it at that.

      Although I strongly disagree with people who like Nazism, I don't care if these people display Swastikas or the Nazi emblem. Really, so what if they do? It's a symbol and the only thing it does is to show everyone that they support Nazism. I can think of a hundred other things to get offended over that are worse than someone's opinions on something... And saying "I support Nazism" is not exactly the same thing as "I support the genocide". People support political parties although they don't agree 100% with their program all the time! I know Democrats who don't support health care and Republicans who do. So I guess it's technically possible for someone to support Nazism without supporting the genocide. So until a Neo-Nazi clearly says "I support the genocide" I really won't be bothered by their political opinions.

      Finally, just because many people can't see past the Nazi use of the Swastika does not mean nobody should be allowed to use it. Some people have a lot of respect for philosophies, cultures, traditions and customs of the past. I think there's a point where people have to stop being sensitive and start thinking a little. I'm sure many people who are offended by an out-of.context Swastika do not even realize it was not created by the Nazis. Should we let ignorance dictate the rules?
      And when you try to silence someone because you don't like their opinions, in essence you are trying to force your own opinions on them. It's basically "Say something I like or shut up". The Nazis were cruel and are very unpopular, but in the end Neo-Nazis displaying swastikas is just people expressing their opinions... Why can't people just think "That guy is an idiot" and leave it at that? Why do they need to be very offended and can't find rest until the person who offends their sensitivity is punished? If you want to live in a democracy you need to learn to disagree, even strongly, but never try to censor the opinions of others.

      So what is X-Box supposed to do?
      First, I don't think the law should let a company offering a public service violate anyone's rights. Banning Swastikas is a violation of free speech, and it is also discriminatory, no matter how unpopular Nazis are.
      It's discriminatory because other political or religious symbols are allowed. It would be one thing if all political or religious symbols were banned, at least everyone would be equal. But in this case, a symbol relevant to only a few groups is banned while other groups can display their symbols. Again, as unpopular as Nazis are, this fits the definitions of "Discrimination".

      Second, I would admire X-Box Live if it tried to be more than a money-making company and tried to educate people a little bit while they make money. Telling offended people "We don't like Nazism, but the Swastika is not exclusive to Nazism" would be good. People would learn some history and a lesson of wisdom (i.e. "Don't be so quick to draw conclusions"). But by giving satisfaction to Swastika-sensitive people, X-Box Live implicitly tells them "You're right, what a horrible symbol of Nazism this is!". When faced with ignorance, the responsible thing to do is to answer with education, not to give satisfaction and approval. And then we wonder why some people can't believe Turkey is a country...

      X-Box should at least allow out-of-context

    17. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Bake · · Score: 0, Troll

      Could you please list the countries in Europe, apart from Germany of course, that have an active ban on the swastika?

    18. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by martin-k · · Score: 1
    19. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His view is commonly held.

      This statement is certainly true but that doesn't make his view the truth. The view that the earth is flat was also commonly held for quite a while. I guess people arguing against it only did it for the sole purpose of arguing back then, too? I guess you'd say their prosecution was justified?

    20. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Zarel · · Score: 5, Informative

      When's the last time you saw a swastika in a movie or a flier or a tattoo or a T-shirt, and it wasn't this bad boy or a reference to it?

      The last time I saw a swastika, it looked something like this: http://www.religionfacts.com/buddhism/images/symbols/swastika-chinese-amulet-cc-rubicon-200.jpg

      Let me try to list all the recent times I've seen swastikas:

      - once, in a screenshot of 4chan trying to be funny
      - three times, in a world history textbook, talking about the Third Reich
      - at least fifty times, at the local Buddhist temple
      - at least thirty times, in various good-luck charms sold at local flea markets
      - once before every important exam I take in school, in a good-luck charm passed down to me from my mother (it looks a lot like the one I linked to)
      - at least twice, in friends' houses, where they are said to bring good luck

      Perhaps, wherever you live, swastikas aren't commonly used, and perhaps you have no interest in other cultures. There's nothing wrong with that. But to assume that your experience holds true for the entire world - and that the swastika universally no longer holds any meaning besides that which was ascribed to it by Nazi Germany - is laughable.

      In Western Europe and North America, the swastika didn't have very much meaning before World War II, so after World War II, it became strongly associated with Nazism. But in Southeast Asia, the swastika has been a symbol of good fortune for thousands of years, and a fleeting decade-long regime in some far-off country did very little to change that.

      Even in the West, such as in the United States, there are many immigrants from Asian countries. I am one of those people, and if someone showed me a swastika (and it wasn't enclosed in a white circle on a background of red), I would think "good luck" before I thought "Nazis", and I bet a significant number of other people in Western countries would, as well.

      I'm not saying that banning swastikas in Xbox Live was a bad decision. It was probably the correct decision, especially if the majority of the Xbox Live users in question are American - though I agree with metrix007 that this guy could have had a better tone about it. I am, however, saying that the association between the swastika and nothing but Nazi Germany is far from universal.

      --
      Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
    21. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When's the last time you heard the word "swastika" and didn't immediately think about its role in Nazi Germany?

      When I did my puja this morning, Ganesha is adorned with a swastika on his palm. Next time will probably be when I do my evening puja.

    22. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hjrnunes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, you can't change the perception of the image, precisely because it is banned almost everywhere! And to be honest, I don't really grasp why. The argument "oh it was used by the evil evil evil nazis" is bull to me. So what? If we start banning things away like that, we'll run out of symbols pretty fast... If it was the portrait of AH we were talking about, I would maybe remotely start to understand... But that doesn't seem to be banned anywhere... And who are you to say what is bad taste and what is not? If it's a free world then it's got to be all free. No exceptions. What's bad taste next? Pedobear? Islamic symbols and lettering?

      Truly, I'm amazed at the stupidity surrounding such phenomenon. A lot of people seems to get shocked at one symbol, yet a lot less are shocked at two stupid wars that cause real suffering and death and solve nothing. Even less seem to care about unjust and unlawful occupation of territories and nations around the world. And I'm not talking about Americans. Europeans tend to fit much more in this description. They face the swastika with the horror of facing the son of Satan or whatever, but then they go happily supporting the war on Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq (although to a lesser extent)... Yeah, the swastika is the real evil here, that's what we should worry about... Fucking imbeciles.

    23. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whilst this perception exists use of this image shall be in bad taste; if you want change - then change the perception of the image.

      To be honest I'm not one of the people that would want the image plastered on my character in a computer game, but I think by even having this conversation I'm trying to change the perception of the image.

      It is possible that racist groups will keep using the Swastika for some time to come and things won't go back to "normal" in Western society, and that would be a shame. If some terrorist organisation started using the Coca Cola ribbon, would that make coke evil*?

      * nevermind the fact that I already wouldn't touch it with a barge pole because of all the crap they put in it - most people still like it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    24. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Servaas · · Score: 1

      shouldn't it be encouraged? lots of people would want to shoot nazis. pathetic.

      Lot's of people want to shoot paedophiles, lets add animated models rapping children for motivation... Has the world really gone this mad?

    25. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      First of all, the symbol is much more common than Hindu mythology. If you are into ancient Greek antiquities it is almost certain you have come across the swastika on helmets, pottery etc. See example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GreekHelmetSwastika.jpg , note it is even the Nazi orientation, and you will see it in most large collections of artifacts (e.g. the Met or museums in Greece). The reverse orientation is also common for other eras, e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kretominoisches_Hakenkreuz_asb_2004_PICT3431.JPG Minoan pottery.
      Now, if someone wanted to make a red black avatar with a bird and a swastika, I can see how it would offend some people (I guess unless the bird was taking a dump on the swastika...).
      However, should they be offended? The Nazi regime ended 65 years ago, my father still shudders at the thought of drunk Nazi soldiers during occupation yelling "Fraulein" while he is hiding with his sisters in the basement, or the sound of Stukas diving, but even he doesn't get "offended" by the sight of a swastika, why should most of the population with no direct WW2 experience?
      It is not like it was the only case of a highly racist ideology. Neither was it the only case where an ideology led to mass murder.
      Why be so exclusive to the swastika? Stalin was not bad with mass extermination, perhaps we should ban the sickles and hammers (except for Grabthar's of course). And let me not get started on the cross, oh, boy, it is the symbol behind more mayhem than any other! I will mention just one example of the cross and murder, one that nobody expects... The Spanish Inquisition! ... and the Crusades! So, two examples, The Spanish Inquisition and the Crusades... and... ;)

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    26. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Servaas · · Score: 1

      His view is commonly held.

      This statement is certainly true but that doesn't make his view the truth. The view that the earth is flat was also commonly held for quite a while. I guess people arguing against it only did it for the sole purpose of arguing back then, too? I guess you'd say their prosecution was justified?

      Well no... they believed the world was flat without understanding why they thought it. We (normal people) hate Nazi symbolism because we know what happened.

    27. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

      ACTUALLY....when I hear someone mention a swastika, or I see it mentioned online, the first thing I think is "it really is too bad that the Nazi Party had to swipe that symbol, considering it was around long before them, and it was and is important to so many cultures...including those in China, Africa, India, the Celts....and now everyone only thinks of it as an evil symbol."

      Yes, I think in long strings like that, and no I don't think that thought just to be contrarian. In spite of what Mr. Toulouse at Microsoft thinks, there are people out there who like to be informed about history and culture for reasons OTHER than to be contrary to his point of view. They like to know and understand the facts. The reality is, understanding how things evolved and where they come from and what they mean allow us to grow as individual people and as a whole. Brushing aside knowledge for the sake of brevity is a sure way to prove you're a waste of someone else's air and space.

      You know the world is going to the shitter when anyone who actually knows the history of something (a word, a symbol, a person, a _______ ad nauseum), and wants to make sure other people are also aware of these things, are just waved away as "contrarian," just because the people who DON'T know the information wish to remain ignorant and clueless.

      Fuck you, Stephen Toulouse of MS. Maybe Xbox Live isn't the place to point out the intricacies of symbol history, but your acceptance of cluelessness is disgusting, and someone should shit in your mother's mouth while you watch.

    28. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by theolein · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's right. I don't. Now fuck off. XBox is not a democracy, it's a business, and it has a vested interest in making sure that it pleases the majority of its customers and keeps within what is commonly held to be social norms. Wankers like you are too interested in being little internet VIPs to compensate for your stupidity in real life.

    29. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well said, but the issue really is context. If this game were being marketed primarily in Asia, it wouldn't be a big deal. It's not. It doesn't seem appropriate for a Westerner to scream, "Oh my God, Nazis!" if they see it used in Brahmin texts. It doesn't seem appropriate for an Easterner (or immigrant) to take umbrage that the swastika has a very specific and very odious meaning in the West.

      Mind you, I would love to see the symbol reclaimed and enjoy the status in the Western world that it has in the East (and even, formerly and to a lesser extent, in the West). There are many avenues and platforms that one might use to that effect. It should be evident that XBLA is not that platform.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    30. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean I can't use whatever I want for a logo!?

      You Nazi ****!

    31. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      That was a nice straw man argument. I never said anything about me thinking that it's cool. I merely meant to imply that one person cannot decide how 'cool' or 'entertaining' something is for everyone else. I also never said that the Xbox was a 'democracy'.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    32. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Raumkraut · · Score: 1

      I guess he meant to say:
      "The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'proof'"

    33. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plural of anecdote is never evidence because anecdotes are extremely susceptible to a number of biases.

    34. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "In Western Europe and North America, the swastika didn't have much meaning before World War II..."

      This is actually false. The swastika was widespread in both areas as a good luck symbol, and I have old family holiday cards from that era to prove it (Jewish-American ones to boot). It was precisely because it was known as a good luck symbol with certain meanings that the Nazis picked it as theirs. Potentially, they could as easily have picked a four leaf clover. However, much like other popular things such as the Bellamy salute and goose stepping, the Nazis co-opted very well known symbols and transformed them into symbols that would be now be interpreted as hateful because the Nazis were simply that influential in their horrors.

    35. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      If some terrorist organisation started using the Coca Cola ribbon, would that make coke evil*?

      No, they are already evil(tm) so the terrorists wouldn't _make_ them evil.....
      Pepsi, of course, would be a different thing altogether, but they are safe because Gabriel is doing tv ads for them.... LOL

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    36. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Inconexo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For most white people.

      I had never seen as many swastikas as when I traveled to Japan. They were widely used in map to mark buddhist temples (just as toris mark sintoist temples).

      I also can recall a japanese anime series in which the airship and total weapon was swastika shaped (which I didn't understood at this age).

      Remember, in a global world, the westerners are a minority.

    37. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      Also the character of "Blade of the immortal" wears a swastika in his suit. So, yes, swastikas can be cool, once the nazi load is removen.

    38. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      What about the American flag? There are plenty that think of it as a symbol of hate (just see the burnings surrounding the Arizona anti-immigration law) should THAT be banned? Not to mention you ARE talking about a game whose sole goal is to kill as many people as you can. Doesn't that strike anybody as just a weee bit hypocritical?

      One of the things I love about the USA is we traditionally haven't been real big on the banning thing. Another poster talked about how they banned the Nazis in Europe, did that magically make them go away? Nope if anything I'd say that has made them MORE powerful since they've made it hidden and dangerous which appeals to the rebellious instead of letting them spout their shit in the open where it can be countered with facts.

      While I don't care WHAT MSFT does or doesn't let go on, since it is their service and you can always take your money somewhere else, what I DO care about is the ever encroaching PC bullshit that states "ohhh, you can't do that or say that, you may offend someone". Good. Someone being offended is NEVER worth giving up our freedom of speech, ever!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    39. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by spynode · · Score: 1

      Swastika is used through wide variety of cultures around the world. Hindu, Buddhism, Nordic cultures, Middle East - you name it.

    40. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      Unless your Hindi or ancient Egyption, you have nothing to stand on for using that symbol.

      Really? When I was in Japan, I saw this symbol everyday.

      Prove it? Its banned in most of Europe.

      Is that a proof? So European words is the definitive one? You are very attached to your own cultural views. You don't understand that "normal" can mean different things depending on the country.

      Additionally, I think in most countries swastikas are banned only when serving to fascist proselitation.

    41. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by delinear · · Score: 1

      Well this story pertains to XBOX Live, which is a global world where the western world is probably not a minority (or if it is, it's likely a significant one, I don't have the figures but sales would seem to indicate a much greater western audience).

    42. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Werrismys · · Score: 1

      Do a google search for Finnish Air Force flag. Those flags are still in use. Only the pilot's emblem on their uniform and national insignia in aircraft was changed because the United Communist Atheist Horde of Russia (part of Allies) demanded it.

      --
      'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
    43. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Other people might disagree.

      And someone might disagree with me when I say that "it's bad to rape children". That doesn't mean I should adjust my position.

      If you think there's something cool about using a swastika to represent you publicly, then there's certainly nothing cool about you.

      It's not the person that's being banned after all, it's the swastika. You want to come back with a symbol that's not offensive, you are welcome. You want to be an asshole, then it's "buh-bye". That actually sounds like a good way to run an online community.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    44. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The problem is from what I understand (I don't have an Xbox) is that they allow other symbols that are equally as offensive to others. I personally see a cross and think religious oppression, should it be banned? I see any Islamist symbol and think of women treated like cattle and suicide bombers, again should it be banned? I see the Star of David and think of incidents like those two soldiers last week in Israel getting probation for using a 9 year old Palestinian as a human shield, should it be banned?

      If they are gonna be throwing the ban hammer they really ought to be fair about it and treat ALL religious symbols and country flags as forbidden. Otherwise they are saying "I don't agree with THESE guys, but I have no problem with THOSE guys".

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    45. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, and where are most Xbox subscribers located? Hint: it's not in Japan.

      For Americans and Europeans, the swastika represents Nazi Germany, not an eastern good-luck symbol. This particular symbol will probably never be otherwise because of the magnitude of the Nazi party's influence on Western history.

      I don't know what's so hard about this... any 14-year old kid in the US that puts together a Swastika is just doing it to piss people off / get attention. Any notion of them actually caring about the swastika symbol is absolutely laughable. Xbox live is not the place for that debate.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    46. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      shouldn't it be encouraged? lots of people would want to shoot nazis. pathetic.

      Lot's of people want to shoot paedophiles, lets add animated models rapping children for motivation...

      People already shoot rappers all the time. It's one way to get their music more air time.

    47. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guys tone seems to be that he knows best and that his view is commonly held, and that the people arguing are only doing so for the sole purpose of arguing.

      I don't think that's true at all, and while a company certainly has no obligation to assure free speech to all customers of its service, I would expect it to at least be considered, especially when the arguments have a lot of merit.

      I mean, if his point is that they won't allow things commonly found horribly offensive then he should have simply stated that, without diminishing the people making the argument. All in all, he comes across like a tool.

      that's because he is a tool

    48. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      >>>There's nothing cool about swastikas, even for Hindus (it's a sacred symbol after all).

      Then how come they have swastikas all over their buildings? It's sacred but not hidden. They use the swastika as frequently as we use crosses. If Xbox Live ever extends to India, they'll have to adjust their policy of banning the swastika as "evil", else they'll be pissing off ~1/2 a billion potential users.

      Next I suppose you'll argue we should ban the Star of David because Hitler used that too (it was a way to enforce segregation and eventually, mark people for death).

      Nothing pisses me off more than people who think the world did not exist before 1900. A symbol that has thousands of years history should be judged on THAT history (i.e. a symbol of luck, health, etc) not the brief 15 year span of the Third Reich. If Hitler had used a Christian cross on his flag, would we then forever be forbidden from using it??? Bullshit.

      THINK don't feel. Use your brain and logic like man; not emotions like an animal.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    49. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hjrnunes · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you're from, but I'm from a Latin country. Not Latin as in what Americans understand as Latin America, but Latin as of Roman cultural heritage. And the swastika use dates back, at least, to the Etruscan civilization, and was commonly used in the Roman Empire.

      So for most intents and purposes throughout the history of my country and continent, it's not a Nazi symbol: It is a symbol used by the Nazis, among others. There's a reason for why they picked it, you know? I do have something to stand on for: 3000 years of history.

      Plus if a swastika should be banned and nobody can stand for it, then the same applies for the fasces, picked by the, well, fascists. But that's a bummer eh? It happens to be a symbol used by the federal government of the USA, among others. That must mean that the USA is fascist government! Guess what? It's been in Europe since Rome as well, probably even before.

      So if you and your country have no fucking history, that's your problem. But don't you dare say what I have or have not to stand on for.

    50. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If people can think shuriken make cool symbols, why do you find it so hard to believe that they might like a swastika simply for the shape?

      It's certainly possible. But there are many "cool" symbols, but only one that means "Nazi". For someone to want to use it in a military context; well that doesn't seem to be derived from its religious origin.

      So choose another "cool" symbol that doesn't have that association. It used to be a perfectly fine symbol, but now, and for a few decades more, it's poisoned.

    51. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Well you can offend one customer by not letting them have their little Nazi symbol (yes, it's a Nazi symbol when used in the context of a war based video game and not an Asian good luck charm at that point), or you can offend hundreds of thousands of customers by allowing the most egregious symbol of hatred in the history of civilization.

      Seems like an easy decision to me (from an economics perspective at least).

    52. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by khallow · · Score: 1

      I don't care how many stories you have or how many people you've talked to, the plural of "anecdote" is not "evidence".

      Uh huh. I've never understood the point of such an erroneous statement. Anecdotes are evidence. They are knowledge. They can even be data. The problem with anecdotes isn't one of misclassification, but that they are low quality. They happen to be poorly substantiated stories which the person remembers. That combination introduces all sorts of biases that cripple them.

    53. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You need a serious dose of perspective if you think the US engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq are anywhere near the same thing as Nazi Germany.

      Start with a history book--preferably one written in German.

    54. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      I never said that you should adjust your opinion, nor did I say anything about me thinking swastikas are cool.

      then there's certainly nothing cool about you.

      Or so you think. It's all about opinions, and nothing more. Of course, Microsoft's opinion is what matters when it comes to bans on Xbox live.

      That actually sounds like a good way to run an online community.

      As someone who doesn't really get offended by mere words or pictures and thinks that people need to toughen up, I disagree. But... I don't really care too much. If they want to do this, fine.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    55. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I think they are cool because I loved Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade(The game). I don't have any other link with Nazism than that. I also like Japanese Schoolgirl uniforms, but I am attracted to neither schoolgirls(well okay, less than to their big sisters) nor to the Prussian Imperial Navy whose uniforms they are derived from.
      I will concede many Swastika wannabe-users may have Neo-Nazi tendencies. There are also Anarchists and Islamists and Radical Christians playing these games, not very different in the danger they pose to society. If you don't like them send the Mossad to do them in, but Freedom of Speech is a right I won't give up for the likes of Hitler and you.

    56. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked your post but the picture you linked to really sucked I don't see a swastika anywhere on there anywhere???

    57. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Speaking as a Buddhist... most of the Buddhists I know avoid using the symbol for two very simple reasons: 1, it's a symbol of pain and hatred for those around us, and 2, there are other symbols that carry the same essential meaning. The fundamental rule of Buddhism is "do no harm", and that symbol has become a symbol of harm for a great many people.

      It's also worth mentionning that Hitler's use of the symbol was a little borked... he actually used a mirror image of the actual symbol.

      So yeah. Anybody who's playing that game and wants to use the symbol is probably doing it for the shock value, or to try to piss people off.

    58. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by homer_s · · Score: 1

      We use swastikas in our hindu temples, in our homes, for good luck, in toys, etc - guess nobody told us they weren't "cool"

    59. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      I am, however, saying that the association between the swastika and nothing but Nazi Germany is far from universal.

      He also say in his post that most of the people making your argument would not wear one to walk down the street. So prove him wrong. Get a big swastika printed on a T-Shirt and wear it outside in a busy place. There is a very real chance that someone will just walk up and punch you in the face without waiting for your wonderful explanation about it being a religious symbol. Not that this is the behaviour I would choose since I abhor violence.

      If you really want a laugh, put on your Swasika T-Shirt and then fly to Israel. You will be lucky if you are even allowed on a plane.

      I know all about it being a religious symbol, but the problem is that about 70 years ago it was then used by dictator who tried to exterminate a large number of people just for being of the wrong descent or having the wrong political views. He utterly fucked over that symbol by adopting it so now when people see it (even those who know it as a religious symbol first), their first association is always with Nazi's. Now no doubt you disagree with this, but I do not believe you. I think you are just deluding yourself for the sake of argument.

      I also think that we have a duty to remember that symbol and what is was bastardized into. Then we can remember the genocide it came to represent and make damn sure we never let that happen again. Yes we can do that without the symbol, but why should we since it is a very powerful association already. How do you choose a new symbol to represent Hitler's mass genocide?

      If I was a server admin and I saw a player with that symbol enter my server, I would just ban you without waiting for an explanation. Not because I am ignorant of the symbols true meaning, but because to many, many people the symbol has taken on a meaning of the symbol of the people who tried to make sure they were never born and hence they now find it offensive. Yes, many Jews still find it a very offensive symbol. Now if you want to complain about this, then go complain to Hitler or whoever chose the symbol for the SS in the first place.

      Incidentally, there is a charity moustache growing competition going on throughout November (Movember). Do you know how many people I have see trying to grow a Charlie Chaplin moustache? None, because too many people now also associate that with Hitler too and it has stopped being a comedy moustache as a result.

      And judging by the number of Hindus on Slashdot today it must be very large religion indeed in the english speaking world. But it is not, so statistically most of you lying to prove a point. I have no way of knowing who is who so I am going to assume that the vast majority of people here are just being childish and risk you being the one exception who is actually a deeply committed Hindhu. Far more likely though is that you earned you slashdot award of "The Contradictor" by being a contrarian.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    60. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      The comparison was between the swastika and the war "the war on Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq". Why are you bringing Nazi Germany into the comparison?

    61. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      At the same time, he does have a point. Bhuddism, hinduism or roman catholicism aside, the swastika is best known as the symbol of the nazis who, lets face it, did some pretty nasty stuff a few years back. Even now if you see a swastika in the western world its tattood on the forehead of some white-supremacist nutbar (or Prince Harry is doing fancy dress again)

      My point is, regardless of its other historic uses, when people see a swastika, they think of nazis. Much like the toothbrush moustache - people don't think of charlie chaplin - they think of hitler.

      Aside from going out to prove a point about censorship, why would anyone want to use any image associated with a world war and the execution of millions of innocent people?http://games.slashdot.org/story/10/11/24/072222/Xbox-Live-Enforcement-mdash-No-Swastika-Logo#

    62. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      One man can make the decision. In real life it is often up to one person or a small group to decide if it is cool or not. It only takes some one with a force of presence to convince many people to change their way of thinking.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    63. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Sprouticus · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't change the perception of the image, precisely because it is banned almost everywhere!

      You are wrong. You and I can't change that perception, but it will change. Probably over the course of the next 100-1000 years it will lose some of its wrongness. At that point it may or may not be picked up as a symbol for another cause. That cause may be good or evil or neither or both. But time does heal all wounds. Given some value of time.

      We give symbols power. This is fact. It is how human minds work. To deny this is to deny being human. And if you acknowledge this then you must decide if this symbol's power is based primarily upon the storied history or it's recent use. For the vast majority of people it is a symbol equated with evil.

      I am not saying we should ban the symbol as in Europe. But to ignore its predominantly interpreted meaning is to do a disservice to those who fought against that banner. And it is perfectly reasonable for XBox Live to exclude it.

      XBox Live !=political speech.

    64. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This particular symbol will probably never be otherwise

      In 100 years, nobody will care about WWII. It will be an old war.

    65. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You don't think that "The comparison between the swastika and the war on Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq" was supposed to be a comparison of the Germans in WW II to the US in Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq?

      I certainly read the post the same way stewbacca did.

      What do you think he was comparing the Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq war to that involved the swastika?

    66. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, there is a lot that is cool about the (original, actual) Swastika symbol.

      There is a relevant point people are missing: the Nazi Swastika is not an actual, official Swastika. It is a bastardized perturbation of an ancient eastern religious symbol. The original has the 'tines' of the symbol pointing to the left (clockwise spiral) and is axis-aligned when displayed. It often comes with a paired 'mirror image' version which spirals in the opposite direction, but is also axis-aligned (not tilted).

      The Nazi symbol is different. It is a single symbol, tilted 45degrees off-axis to make a sort of diamond shape, and uses the counter-clockwise spiral exclusively. It is also relevant to note the colors and context of the symbol in its surroundings to determine which it is being used as. In countries from China to India to Thailand to Japan, that symbol is all over the place. Wherever you see certain temples, they will denote it with a simple swastika. It's commonplace.

      It is unfortunate that the Nazis chose to pollute such a peaceful and historical symbol. The swastika is NOT an 'evil' symbol, and it has a long and interesting history. It is - in fact - quite 'cool'.

      Believe it or not? I'm going to choose 'not'.

      There are billions of people in the Indo-Asia area which believe strongly that this is a valid, and respected religious symbol. To me, that does not equal his belief being 'normal and commonly held'. Maybe among ignorant fools.

      Because this guy is uneducated on this fact, and seems to think all swastika symbols are Nazi-related regardless of how they are shown, he is imposing his personal opinion on everyone using this service and device under the guise of 'moderation' and his own misguided belief about history instead of fact.

      Tack on the fact that seeing and knowing about the symbols doesn't necessarily mean you are PROMOTING the ideas of those that previously used the symbol, and this guy is - in fact - removing a source of exposure and education of history from their service by doing this.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    67. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      If you include India in the English speaking world, it is probably pretty close to being the biggest religion. I still consider the swastika to be a Nazi symbol though.

      Congratulations to Slashdot for invoking Goodwin's Law in the initial summary.

    68. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't tell people how to react to a symbol - people are irrational animals. Sufficient people react sufficifiently badly to that particular symbol that it's deemed acceptable to ban its usage. That's all there is to it. My personal feeling is that bans give power to words and symbols, but I can understand that other people feel strongly about such things, I'm willing to respect their feelings accordingly.

    69. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, no matter what the origin of the symbol is, it is associated with Nazi Germany and the Third Reich in Europe and America. As the article states near the end, there isn't enough context in your game profile to explain what you mean by using the symbol, so most people will be offended.

      The world did not exist before 1900, there is almost no one left alive who remembers the world before 1900. However, there are still many, many people who were affected by WW2 in some way, and they don't give a monkey's about what the swastika *used* to be used for before Adolf came by and started killing millions of people who didn't fit his ideological image of the perfect human being.

    70. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually, when I was a kid, and first saw the swastika, with no context at all. I thought they were pretty cool, I even remember drawing a bunch of them on my chaulk board before my father took me aside and told me that I probably want to be careful where I draw that because not everyone appreciates the symbol (I was a bit too young to understand much more of an explanation than that)

      There is something really cool about the symbol itself. I can't put my finger on what it is, but, it may be part of why they picked it as their symbol.

      Then again, I really like the toothbrush mustache too, and think it really is too bad that Hitler killed it too. I mean, it is silly isn't it? Ok, he raised an army that tried to take over land by force and slaughtered millions, monsterous stuff, but, what was his mustache's role in all that? Isn't it an innocent bystander here?

      I mean, these bans make about as much sense as meeting Hitler's cousins grand daughter and telling her that she is an evil bitch and should just die because she is a relative of Hitler.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    71. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Cerium · · Score: 1

      Really? When I was in Japan, I saw this symbol everyday.
       
      ...?
      Are you sure they weren't your own drawings and/or in your own house?

      I'm currently in Japan and have, very recently, been to a number of major-ish cities, including Fukuoka, Nagasaki, and Kyoto and have stopped at many Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines along the way. And with all the traveling and sightseeing I've done, I've yet to see a single swastika. Not that I've been looking for them, or that I'd even be offended, but, as someone who's spent the vast majority of his life in America soaking up western culture, I'd like to assume that such a symbol would stand out to me.

      I'm not looking to start an internet argument or anything; your experience just seems extremely contrary to my own, and I'm really curious to learn how/why any modern society would even consider using that symbol, knowing the complete history behind it and how horribly offensive it is to a sizable portion of the world's population.

    72. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TLDR

    73. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      In real life it is often up to one person or a small group to decide if it is cool or not.

      That's true, but it is still only their opinion in the end, and not fact, regardless of how many people share the same opinion. I know what you mean, however.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    74. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In Western Europe and North America, the swastika didn't have very much meaning before World War II, so after World War II, it became strongly associated with Nazism. But in Southeast Asia, the swastika has been a symbol of good fortune for thousands of years, and a fleeting decade-long regime in some far-off country did very little to change that.

      Not entirly true. The swastika has a history of being used even in Europe. For example the Swedish company Asea used it in its logotype but changed it 1933 because of its heavy use among the Nazis.
      The swastika has also been used to respresent the hammer of Thor and was for example depicted on the Snoldelev Stone in the 9th century.

    75. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Kavafy · · Score: 1

      No, wait: the swastika is a symbol and the war is a war. I actually think the GGP made a good point there. We should see a symbol for what it is - it might evoke something horrible but the symbol itself won't harm anyone.

    76. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      My personal feeling is that bans give power to words and symbols, but I can understand that other people feel strongly about such things, I'm willing to respect their feelings accordingly.

      That is exactly what I am saying. It is an artificial reaction, induced by banning the thing and constantly reminding its connection to atrocities. Ban racist talk if you wish but stop needlessly demonizing a geometric shape and people (the vast majority with no connection to WW2) will not react at all to it.
      I would even go on to say that by reacting to a symbol like that you are empowering it, when it will be just a piece of history if you treat it that way.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    77. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would ANYONE bring Nazi Germany into a discussion about swastikas? I suppose nobody should mention slavery and the Rebel flag either?

      Maybe you just played too much Pokemon:

      http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Koga's_Ninja_Trick_(Gym_Challenge_115)

    78. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by dasunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I did my puja this morning, Ganesha is adorned with a swastika on his palm. Next time will probably be when I do my evening puja.

      Better than me.

      I keep thinking "ramens". The brand of instant noodle I keep at work for a quick meal if I'm working late has a swastika on the package. This discussion is making me hungry. ;)

    79. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Kavafy · · Score: 1

      The problem is his dismissive attitude of the other side as simply being contrarians.

      Exactly right, and especially so given that this attitude is so USA-centric. It's dismissive of others countries where Nazism is not the primary association of the swastika.

    80. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It took the cross/crucifix two plus centuries to be widely accepted as the Christian symbol. Before that it was viewed as a horrible symbol of Roman capital punishment. The swastika will probably suffer the same fate. As with all symbols, deities, flags, and beliefs as the generations continue to remove them selves from the origins they loose power and significance, it's just the way it works.

      The guy should just have said "good for you, but our policy doesn't allow it." and leave it at that.

    81. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like you guys didn't read the article.

      Context people. His point is that the swastika was a symbol used by the Nazi's and their goal was to kill the Jews. It doesn't matter if your personal belief is says it's good luck. You don't have the space to make your point in the little box.

      He acknowledges that it may be harmless in certain (and here is the important word again) context, but on Xbox Live, in a game designed to be enjoyed by people who live in the free world, the swastika is universally a bad symbol.

    82. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, who decides when the madness stops? A few decades from now, huh? I doubt the madness will stop; you're just coddling the mad.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    83. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...not really an appropriate platform for reclaiming the symbol.

      Porch monkey 4 life... It's cool, I'm taking it back!

    84. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except maybe the Jewish people. It is one of the most defining periods of their history, for better or worse.

    85. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people seems to get shocked at one symbol, yet a lot less are shocked at two stupid wars that cause real suffering and death and solve nothing.

      Did you read this part of the post. The poster is clearly talking about a symbol. Yes, it is a symbol that was used by one of the parties in WWII, but its just a symbol. This is then contrasted with a real war with real people suffering and dieing.

    86. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Otherwise they are saying "I don't agree with THESE guys, but I have no problem with THOSE guys".

      More or less, although it's more like, "I definitely have a problem with THESE guys, I'm neutral about everything else."

      So what's the problem here? We're not talking about government censorship here---Microsoft has no legal or moral duty to enforce content-neutral policies in XBLA. Is it unfair to the Nazis that their symbol gets picked on rather than something else? Yeah, sure, maybe in some sense of the word. Is there a principle at stake? No, not really, once we've agreed that Microsoft has dominion over its own policies regarding content censorship.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    87. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by johneee · · Score: 1

      Sure, and I don't really see anything wrong with rehabilitating the symbol if people want to do it. Not something I'd want to be spending my time on, but whatever floats your boat.

      However, and I think this is the original point, the place for that rehabilitation, the place for the conversation is not within a video game platform. Or at least, by MS's choice, not their video game platform.

      Once the conversation's been had, and if it's been resolved, then I'm sure MS would be just fine to allow people to use the symbol - let's all try in a hundred years if things go right. From anything I can tell, nobody's saying (well, nobody at XBox, anyway) that the conversation couldn't take place, just that they don't want the conversation, or the symbol anyway, to take place on their site in that way. There's nothing whatsoever wrong with that.

      Of course, it's also completely disingenuous to suggest that someone who wants to use the swastika in a war shooter (even if it does take place in after the war) but that's beside the point.

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    88. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      The issue is you're twisting the meaning of what hjrnunes said. If I am mistaken perhaps you could quote the part of the post where hjrnunes mentions the US or Nazi Germany.

    89. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of them, they make up the border of the image. (The image on the amulet, not the JPG.)

      Also, even if you added a hundred question marks, it would still not make your statement into a question.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    90. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As someone who doesn't really get offended by mere words or pictures

      Oh yeah? Let me show you a picture of your kid getting raped or your grandparents getting cooked in an oven and let's see if you get "offended".

      It's the people who are above it all that are really beneath contempt.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    91. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like the Yin yang. It's symmetrical and interesting. I'm sure kids have drawn it without knowing its meaning or history albeit nothing compared to the Third Reich

    92. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      There's nothing cool about swastikas, even for Hindus (it's a sacred symbol after all).

      By that same logic, you could say that there's nothing cool about crosses, even for Christians (it's a sacred symbol, after all). Yet many people are proud to display their sacred symbol.

    93. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Jamu · · Score: 1

      Buddhist temples are often marked on Japanese maps with a swastika.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    94. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Yeah, sure, who decides when the madness stops? A few decades from now, huh? I doubt the madness will stop; you're just coddling the mad.

      It's not "mad" to find Nazism repugnant. I guessed "a few decades" as by then everyone who has direct memories of them will be dead. We can make jokes about evil things that happened hundreds of years ago without causing great offence. But not things in living memory. What's the tradeoff? You can't use a particular "cool symbol" in an FPS, vs offending millions of people whose relatives were murdered by people wearing that symbol?

    95. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      You don't think that "The comparison between the swastika and the war on Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq" was supposed to be a comparison of the Germans in WW II to the US in Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq?

      No. Since that's not what it says, why would you read it what way?

      Let me rewrite the OP a bit for you to assist your comprehension: "They face an abstract geometric form that has negative connotations for many people (though positive ones for others[*]) with the horror of facing the son of Satan or whatever, but then they go happily supporting the actual on-going killing of human beings in Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq (although to a lesser extent)...Yeah, the abstract geometric form is the real evil here, that's what we should worry about..."

      The symbol is not the thing, the pointer isn't the object, the map is not the territory.

      ([*]You will commonly see swastikas on shrines and temples in Japan. It's often used on maps to mark a temple. We live in an international culture; nearly 40% of the world's population is Chinese or Indian, cultures where this is a symbol with positive associations.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    96. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hjrnunes · · Score: 1

      Well, since you mentioned it, as far as I'm concerned, the US engagements in Afghanistan/Pakistan and Iraq have about the same - if not even less (Germany was actually at an extremely disadvantageous position and was being robbed of her money, while enduring the effects of a financial global catastrophe) - legitimacy as the German engagements that eventually led to World War 2. Both used a lame excuse to start a conflict with worldwide repercussions, although in different scales.

      But that wasn't my point. My point was - and is - that much of the same people that get all worked up about a symbol, don't seem to oppose actual unprovoked wars that bring actual (not symbolic) devastation and misery to all envolved parties. The fact that you replied the way you did is a strong indicator that my point is probably quite in perspective.

    97. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem isn't the swastika symbol in COD:BLOPS, its when people do it in black in a white circle on a red background adorned with the eagle symbol that was also conscripted by Nazis from other non-nefarious historical sources. Then the player has a name like "coonkillerKKK" or "hangAllDemJews420" and they're the ones who are making the argument for "swastika is not a bad symbol"

      I know this because I play BLOPS daily and 9 times out of 10 the above is exactly true, for that other 1 time it's a player without a racist/prejudiced name but still uses the _very_ Nazi oriented swastika.

    98. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hjrnunes · · Score: 1

      True. But since XBox Live != political speech, I really don't see why any symbol should be banned. If someone gets offended by it, that someone has to deal with it. I can be offended by a lot of things, and so can you and everybody else. If we start banning everything that offends anything, we'll rapidly turn our world into an iconoclast one...

      Anyway, I believe the swastika is pretty much alone on this one, except for maybe a few obscure racist symbology, that most people don't know of anyway.

      More to the actual point, I think the proper answer would be what AC wrote below.

    99. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      The action itself is what is offensive, not the picture. Getting offended changes nothing. You're taking it to an extreme, however.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    100. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The Afghan war is still raging, but all the WWII veterans I've known are dead. Not many people who were adults in the 1940s are still alive. Hell, my dad's 79 and he was too young for WWII.

    101. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      You want to come back with a symbol that's not offensive, you are welcome. You want to be an asshole, then it's "buh-bye". That actually sounds like a good way to run an online community.

      I rather like this, except I feel that PEOPLE LIKE YOU and the guy from the service are the assholes.

      What happens now?

    102. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, seriously. Even after 2 millennium the Jews are still whining about Pharaoh, and celebrating their genocide of Egyptian males!

    103. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Rallion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everything you said is true (except for the last part about a simple in-game picture being a potential source of education and meaningful exposure--I don't learn all about the history of Christianity by seeing an image of a cross)

      None of it changes the fact that the people in question are probably unaware of these facts, and almost certainly using the symbol in a hateful way.

    104. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I most recently saw the swastika at the US Library of Congress: it's a motif they have all over the place - in the floor tiles, in wallpaper patterns, etc.

      I keep a precursor to the (Western-type, non-Buddhist) swastika in my office - it has 8 arms which extend straight and terminate in circles; it's a Ptolemic-era sigil for Osiris.

      I can appreciate the ban in terms of mainstream beliefs about the symbol and how it would probably be used; however, I also agree that the tone and the presumptions being made are onerous.

    105. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Lets see, who uses xbox live?

      Those billions of dirt poor Asians that think its a great symbol ... or the Europeans and other westerners who think of it as basically pure evil?

      Whats that? You didn't think about the fact that the guys target audience is a group of people that think of the symbol as evil and the group of people who think its good and peaceful make up exactly 0% of his target?

      My god, its amazing what happens when you start actually looking at the whole situation rather than one idiotic little bit to prove your own point.

      XBox Live isn't there to educate or expose people. It is not a public service. Your opinion does not match that of the majority of its customers.

      When you are in the minority, you lose, sorry. You also utterly ignored his very points which I have re illustrated since you appear to be unable to read and comprehend it the first time.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    106. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      - at least thirty times, in various good-luck charms sold at local flea markets

      Either you don't live in the USA or those weren't 'good luck charms' at the flea market.

      Its not that this experience is that of the whole world, but it DOES match those who use XBox live, which amazing as this may be to you, in general, is not a large population of Buddists, but for fucks sake don't let context ruin your ignorance.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    107. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you heard the word "swastika" and didn't immediately think about its role in Nazi Germany?

      When's the last time your security was threatened by a 'German Nazi' of any kind, or in any way? Don't you think that perhaps your association is a bit dated by this point, and that perhaps you have some emotional growing up to do?

      Are you likewise terrorized by the Jolly Roger? Because THAT symbol over a ship passing by definitely was NOT cool. You were about to be raided, and would probably die - if not from guns and swords, then from infection from shrapnel.

      Do they ban the skull and crossbones?

      And Ninjas, those are cool, too, right? Well they weren't in their day. They were honor-less fiends assassinating people in the night. Abhorred in their time like we would a demonic cult.

      It seems we've gotten over pirates and ninjas. They're historical figures now, and have little to no bearing on our modern reality. Some day we'll see Nazis in this light as well. Maybe that starts today.

    108. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The guys tone seems to be that he knows best and that his view is commonly held, and that the people arguing are only doing so for the sole purpose of arguing.

      Yeah, like Hitler did.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    109. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Microsoft and Xbox Live have every right to say and act like that. It's a private business, freedom of speech is not protected there. If that's their policy then so be it. If you don't agree with that policy then don't support the company/service.

      Now your comment has a lot of merit when it's a public forum protected by a government (in the case of the USA) that professes free speech and equality.

    110. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      How much fun would Raiders of the Lost Ark have been without swastikas?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    111. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, she was a 98-pound white-trash kind of girl, but my friend palmed his dreidel just in case there were more where she came from. As it turned out, there was a whole group of them in that apartment complex. That was about 4 years ago.

      The Reich is gone forever, but the symbolism and significance lives on.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    112. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      First we need to get that toothbrush mustache back. Then we can focus on the swastikas!

    113. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      That's not a Nazi. No more than Vanilla Ice was a ninja. That's just an example of an asshole, and since there are lots of those we can't exactly go around shaping the world to avoid them.

      My advice would be to hold the dreidel in one hand and an outstretched finger on the other.

    114. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's also worth mentionning that Hitler's use of the symbol was a little borked... he actually used a mirror image of the actual symbol." What are you talking about? The swastika can be shown left or right facing. Hitler used the more common right facing just slanted at a 45 degree angle. Some people refer to the left facing version as a sauwastika, but I haven't heard that term anywhere but Wikipedia.

    115. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Unless your Hindi or ancient Egyption, you have nothing to stand on for using that symbol.

      Your ignorance is showing. It was also used in Scandinavia and Britain (where it's being called "fylfot").

      So for my intents and purposes, its a Nazi symbol.

      Fixed.

    116. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please. Everything he says is spot-on. The only reason this article is even up here is to give Slashdotters a chance to point and say "huur huuur Microsoft is eviiil!" once more.

    117. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried reading a German history book online, but the lack of spaces caused some serious word-wrapping issues which made it too difficult to read.

    118. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I've got a T shirt with "Ten thousand hands serve the Empire!" in Japanese with a large swastika. It's cool because it celebrates Japanese imperialism not Nazi imperialism. When people ask me I tell them it's a Buddhist phrase meaning "world peace and vegetarianism"

      How do you feel about that? Should I be able to use that phrase as my XBox handle?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    119. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There are billions of people in the Indo-Asia area which believe strongly that this is a valid, and respected religious symbol. To me, that does not equal his belief being 'normal and commonly held'. Maybe among ignorant fools.

      And there are a billion people in the West to whom the swastika is the symbol of the most evil regime ever, so I throw that same thing right back at you: what makes group A's opinion right and group B's opinion wrong, especially when group A knows all about what happened to group B and group B is the overwhelmingly larger market for the device in question?

      Maybe you'd have something of an argument if this was the IndiaBox 360, marketing a game about Buddhism with 90% of the playerbase being Buddhists. But no, anyone who knows about WW2 is clearly an ignorant fool... those guys wearing swastika logos on their characters in a shooting game are clearly doing it because they want good luck while they repeatedly shoot people.

    120. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by prelelat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think your missing the point of the guys argument. He's not saying it's always bad to use the swastika as a symbole. He's suggesting that without the context of why that person is using that symbole they won't understand it. You are obviously educated heck a lot of people around here are smart enough to know that the Swastika wasn't always used for that. I think a large number of those educated people would also be smart enough to realize that the large demographic for these games even if it is rated M for mature aren't mature/educated enough to distinguish the difference between the two symboles. Taken in the wrong context the Swastika is very offensive especially if it was a symbole of someone who murdered your grandparents and everyone they knew, it spews hate. It's unfortunate that such a peacful symbole would be basterdized into that but that's what happend. To advoid that sort of hate and misunderstanding at this point I think the XBOX live team is right to ban it. If the main meaning in the western population were to change out of respect for those who use it as a peaceful sign then I'm sure they would change their minds.

      In the middle of a game with no context is no way to change that opinion, it can spread more hate especially in a war game. So yeah they might not be promoting the ideas of Nazi's but 90% of the people they play with probably wouldn't even have an idea it was used for something good and most of those that did wouldn't see that in that context.

    121. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Who really gives a fuck if someone has a swastika as their logo? Do people seriously give that much power over themselves to strangers? Besides that, it's a fucking killing game! You can kill people, but you can't have a symbol that might represent killing people, to certain people? If you are so bound up in an identity that cannot tolerate the existence of a symbol, that symbol is the least of your worries, and you probably shouldn't be mock-killing people to begin with. I'm sure Adolf Hitler laughs in his grave every time a Jew gets riled up because he/she sees a swastika somewhere. It's a tiny little victory for Nazism every time a Jew has a negative emotion of any sort. If swastikas make Jews uncomfortable or offended, then that makes Nazis happy. So by creating such a stigma over the symbol, the Jews are actually MAKING NAZIS HAPPY. Just like how every new security measure we add at the airport makes terrorists happy. We're not undermining them, we're doing exactly what they want...

    122. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by demonbug · · Score: 1

      So yeah. Anybody who's playing that game and wants to use the symbol is probably doing it for the shock value, or to try to piss people off.

      Exactly. It is a handy symbol to identify people you don't want to be playing with, don't take it away. We should encourage anyone who wants to use it to do so, so the rest of us know to avoid them.

      Sort of like those helpful Raiders stickers people put on their cars, telling everyone around them, "I am a douchebag, stay away."

      (Does that count as my daily required car analogy?)

    123. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by poena.dare · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hear, Here! I'm fully on board with companies employing people to make considered, rational judgement about player-created content. Stephen Toulouse demonstrated in his post:

      1) Consideration: He and his team are aware of the history of the swastika.
      2) Reasonableness: What the average user of their services would associate with the symbol.

      This is sanity, not oppression. Toulouse should be commended for his straightforward explanation.

    124. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You want to come back with a symbol that's not offensive, you are welcome.

      Came back with a hammer & sickle. Since only dirty Russians died at the hands of communism instead of Jews, it's OK!

    125. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by jpate · · Score: 1

      That's not true at all. A study takes a controlled sample of individual stories about a real event, whether by generating the sample in a laboratory experiment or being extremely careful about the collection of the sample in an observational study. You can't just haphazardly gather observations and expect to have reliably sampled a target population.

    126. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Not true at all, you knee jerk reactionist.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    127. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Your post became invalid when you compared a symbol to child rape.

      I find the cross, especially the crucifix, extremely disturbing , violent , and representative of simply minded idiocy. I would never force someone to not wear one.

      And for the record, I can find a hell of a lot more atrocity done by people where crosses then swastica.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    128. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you can't change the perception of the image, precisely because it is banned almost everywhere! And to be honest, I don't really grasp why. The argument "oh it was used by the evil evil evil nazis" is bull to me. So what? If we start banning things away like that, we'll run out of symbols pretty fast... If it was the portrait of AH we were talking about, I would maybe remotely start to understand... But that doesn't seem to be banned anywhere... And who are you to say what is bad taste and what is not? If it's a free world then it's got to be all free. No exceptions. What's bad taste next? Pedobear? Islamic symbols and lettering?

      It (and other controversial items/topics) are banned on most all forums online for a simple reason -- the vast majority of people using them are NOT trying to do so to engender discussion, but to troll/harass/etc. If you want to blame anyone for this, blame all the people out there that think anonymity on the Internet = license to be the biggest asshole they can be.

      In the case of the swastika though, it is most commonly associated with Nazi Germany, simply because WWII and the Holocaust are rather major historical events and so everyone learns about them. The Nazis used the swastika quite extensively, so it's quite difficult to disassociate them for purposes of teaching. Even if you could do so, why would you? There are plenty of groups who continue to use it as a symbol to promote Nazi Germany's ideals, including killing off everyone who's not blonde and blue-eyed. People need to know the context behind the symbol because it's still relevant. So here you can blame all those aryan brotherhood folks for keeping the swastika in use as a symbol of hate.

      Who am I to say what's in bad taste and not? If you're on a forum that runs on my servers on a domain I own, I'm basically god. It's my site, my rules. If you don't like it, go find somewhere else to discuss it. I'm betting you wouldn't like it much if someone started posting stuff you found horribly offense on a site you owned and controlled either. And this is exactly what Microsoft's saying. It's their service, their rules and you agreed to their Terms of Service when you signed up for the service. That ToS forbids using symbols like the swastika.

      This is a complete non-issue. What it boils down to is "user wants to do something that violates the ToS, company doesn't allow it and explains why".

    129. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And the longer we keep it on the pedestal as an untouchable symbol of evil, the longer people will consider it bad. The very idea of having something 'bad' is what drive a sizable amount of people to wear it.

      If people didn't make a big deal about it, then people could stop letting it impact their lives.

      Do you know why there is no derogatory term the bothers white males? It's because we don't care.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    130. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And the longer people hold the view you posted, the longer the symbol will have 'power' over peoples lives.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    131. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by DanTheStone · · Score: 1

      Same situation for me when I was 7 or 8 years old, except that mine was on paper and my teacher was of Jewish descent. She freaked out and called my parents, who told her I had no idea what it represented (which was true). I was told not to draw that anymore.

      Point: I thought it was a cool symbol, having no context of its associations.

    132. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to try rereading that comment. He's not comparing what's happening in Iraq and Afghanistan to the atrocities committed by the Nazis. The GP is saying that it's stupid to be more concerned about a symbol which reminds us of death and suffering which occurred in the past than the actual death and suffering which is occurring right now.

    133. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea how someone could moderate you insightful, basically your argument is that it is not OK to show a hate symbol associated with racist extremists because the only people who do not think the symbol is evil are of a lesser race ("dirt poor Asians")?

      I do not know if I am more amazed by the irony of your post or by the lack of education you show; out of the top five richest countries in the world, three (China, Japan and India) are in Asia.

      Seriously, you must be trolling.

    134. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      It is unfortunate that the Nazis chose to pollute such a peaceful and historical symbol. The swastika is NOT an 'evil' symbol, and it has a long and interesting history. It is - in fact - quite 'cool'.

      Believe it or not? I'm going to choose 'not'.

      There are billions of people in the Indo-Asia area which believe strongly that this is a valid, and respected religious symbol. To me, that does not equal his belief being 'normal and commonly held'. Maybe among ignorant fools.

      It is a shame that the Nazis did that, but it's done and there's no going back. In the US in particular the swastika is almost always associated with the Nazis simply because WWII and the Holocaust are rather major historical events. Not to mention there's plenty of aryan brotherhood groups still using the swastika as a symbol to promote everything wrong the Nazis did. It's very much still in use as a symbol of hate.

      Believe it? Sure I do, I've known about it for a long time, doesn't change the fact that most people in the US (also Europe, Canada) associate it with the Nazis. And your argument kinda runs off the rails in that bolded part. We're not dealing with the Indo-Asia area. We're dealing with North America. Even if you try to argue that people from that area use Xbox Live, Microsoft is still a US company. Their policies on acceptable use are going to by and large reflect that.

      Personally I've yet to see someone use the swastika online that was trying to promote discussion about it. Every time, without exception, I've encountered it on forums and such it was someone trying to promote the "ideals" of Nazi Germany and/or harassing people. So yeah, people who use it online by and large are doing so to promote the ideas of the Nazis. I'm certain there are exceptions, but they're few enough that it makes sense for site owners to ban it. Besides, if your goal is education, using it as an avatar is a bad idea. Most people would simply see it and never ask you why you used it. Hardly a teaching moment there.

      Besides, this is a total non-issue. Xbox Live's Terms of Service forbids this type of thing. You agreed to that ToS when you signed up. So it's not so much about the swastika as it is about violating a contract. (ToS's are a contract between the user and the company.) And really, online games are NOT the place to even try to educate people about this issue. When you're playing a game you want to have fun, to escape reality, not to get a 5 minute lecture on why the swastika's actually a totally cool symbol that the Nazis corrupted.

    135. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by falsified · · Score: 1

      Yep, and they're making the judgment here that they just don't WANT the people who think swastikas are cool. Good for them.

      Yes, I know the basic swastika design has a history of hundreds (probably more than a thousand) of years before the Nazis used it. However, the prongs of the swastika are often pointed the other direction in those cases. Also, ya know what? If you're playing a military video game, it's pretty easy to tell which swastika you're trying to conjure. Especially if we're talking black lines, white circle, inside of a red square. If your avatar is the design of the Samarra bowl, and you have an actual reason for it besides being a contrarian jackass, then fine, make your case.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    136. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, sure, none of those guys were in the Luftwaffe. The modern KKK doesn't go around burning crosses in people's front yards any more, near as I can tell. I haven't heard of anyone getting lynched in years.

      Here's some counter-advice: Spend a day walking around in full Klansman gear (the distinction seems rather blurred in American culture) and explaining to everyone how dated their sentiments are, how the Klan stopped its reign of terror years ago, what is your problem, people? (Please take a camera with you if you do this...I would pay good money to see the looks on their faces.) You can drag on all you want about how the Nazis are dead and who cares any more, but if the ideas and symbolism have outlived their progenitors, then clearly, it's very much alive.

      (Did I just invent a new kind of Godwin? Like, if the conversation is already about Nazis, who do you compare them to in a broad analogy?)

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    137. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by falsified · · Score: 1

      I know you got modded troll, but you were just trying to be the devil's advocate here. And, full disclosure, I agree that in terms of pure aesthetics, the Nazis knew what the hell they were doing. Seriously, pure black uniforms? Especially when advocating for a pure white culture? Way to throw us for a loop, dudes!

      However, good design conjures emotions, memories, feelings, desires. This is why companies will spend years, and millions of dollars, redesigning their logos or Web sites.

      Which emotions, memories, feelings, and desires does the Nazi swastika provoke? Anything good? Of course not. At least with Christianity you can point to the generally well-intentioned contemporary churches (no, not all of them..probably not even most).

      Stark contrast, clean lines, easily remembered and reproduced - yes, the swastika has an appealing shape from a design perspective. But there was that whole Holocaust thing. So, yes, it's COMPLETELY fine to ban it on a private network.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    138. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      You can drag on all you want about how the Nazis are dead and who cares any more, but if the ideas and symbolism have outlived their progenitors, then clearly, it's very much alive.

      My point would be, then, that the people keeping that fear alive are the ones doing the modern evil.

    139. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by falsified · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The American Civil War has no relevance anymore, either. Also, the French Revolution? Who can remember what the fuss was about?

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    140. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Do you remember, a few years back, when the swastika was removed, by microsoft, from one of their fonts? It was, as I remember, at the request of some jewish group that had heard about it.

      The only problem was... they removed it from a sanskrit font. Talk about context issues!

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    141. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reread what was written. I didn't say the symbol is bad, I said that it's become a symbol of hatred for those around me, and that out of respect for those people, I don't use the symbol myself.

    142. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No, he's applying commercially led censorship using flimsy excuses to justify banning one symbol and not others.

      If he had any moral grounding then he would be banning other symbols too, instead of belittling the people that highlight the logical fallacies in his position.

      It's Microsoft's service, they can do what they want with it. Doesn't mean he's not a twat about it though.

    143. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Symbols have no meaning other than that which has been ascribed to them by the persons looking at it. Sure, it used to represent peace and love and all that hippie crap, but for the western world today it carries the meaning ascribed to it by the Nazi Party of Germany.

    144. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      I suppose this is, effectively, to say that if people stopped attaching a meaning to certain symbols, then the symbols would have no meaning. Which is all fine and dandy and clearly the case. Of course, suggesting it normatively is about as silly as declaring, "Hey, guys, racial epithets have no meaning any more, it's okay if we use them now!" and then getting frustrated when no one immediately drops their cultural understanding of the terms.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    145. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      The guys tone seems to be that he knows best and that his view is commonly held, and that the people arguing are only doing so for the sole purpose of arguing.

      He's in charge of policing xbox live. Have you been on xbox live? Cops get jaded from seeing too many meth-heads, drunks, assholes, and wannabe gangsters. It should not be surprising if he gets a bit jaded. I mean, this is the internet. Imagine having to police a million teenagers. I saw him talk at PAX, and he actually was a lot less jaded than I would have anticipated, I was impressed. Here's a transcript of his talk, and includes some of what they clean up on live.

      During the Q and A session, one or two people in the audience decided to try to argue that their being banned was unjustified. Needless to say, they said they had done nothing wrong and deserved to be reinstated. Also needless to say, there was no way for the guy at the podium to verify any of that, and yet these people would not shut up or let him continue. Those are the types of people he has to deal with all day, except they're not face to face, so they're more brazen than that. It's easy to see why he might assume they were arguing just to argue: it's undoubtedly happened to him many, many times before. For example, last year, some stupid kid got banned for numerous offenses while playing modern warfare. He put a video, heavily edited to make it look like he did nothing wrong, up online, and started trying to get people on his side. source

      Anyway, Mr. Toulouse undoubtedly has little power to decide what MS will allow to be posted on their service, or their policy on users posting swastikas. It doesn't do anyone any good for him to say "Let's talk about this" when he's been told by his boss that he needs to keep swastikas off so that MS doesn't get bad PR from it.

    146. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > Remember, in a global world, the westerners are a minority.

      I will raise you one India, which is one of the birthplaces of the swastika, where everyone and their mom will readily tell you that swastikas mean nazis and by the way, would you like to buy "Mein Kampf"? Same for Arabia and Africa, at least the portions that I saw.

      But all of this does not even matter. XBox Live is a US-based operation. Their service, their standards.

      Finally, a locally-used map is different from a globally-used gaming service.

    147. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      There's a gap between the bevy of proper responses and the topic here - banning a person from a service.

      We're not discussing 'frustration'...

    148. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      The guys tone seems to be that he knows best and that his view is commonly held, and that the people arguing are only doing so for the sole purpose of arguing.

      Because that is the commonly held view and the sole reason people are making the argument is to argue. When someone on Xbox live sees a swastica as part of the character's emblam their first thought is not going to be, "Wow, this guy loves Eastern religious symbols." They're going to think he's a Nazi sympathizer. At best.

      I don't think that's true at all, and while a company certainly has no obligation to assure free speech to all customers of its service, I would expect it to at least be considered, especially when the arguments have a lot of merit.

      The arguments don't have a lot of merit. Just because you feel an argument is valid doesn't automatically make it so. Even on teh internets.

      I mean, if his point is that they won't allow things commonly found horribly offensive then he should have simply stated that, without diminishing the people making the argument. All in all, he comes across like a tool.

      Actually he comes across as someone giving a far more thoughtful answer than is actually necessary. The tools are the ones making the argument and somehow thinking that obscure references equate to merit. Most of slashdot is educated. We know that the before the Nazi's the Swastika was a symbol of peace (Hell, we even know that the Nazi version is reversed). However, we also know that the Nazi's organized the slaughter of millions of people, and that their racial aggression led to tens of millions of deaths in war. That would be the huge, massively glaring fact that none of your arguments can overcome. And also why none of your arguments have merit.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    149. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      You are missing a point - most people (by percentage of population of this world) don't think of swastika as bad, because most people don't live in Europe and and most people don't care if Europeans killed each other - they killed far more people during colonialism in Asia than they killed Jews, and it was organised. I completely believe that you would disagree with this point because it is not taught in Europe - it is simply not that important for Europeans to know.

      Having said that, the demography of XBox Live is probably US so they can afford to be euro centric and reject swastika. But if that demography involves Indians, I wonder if it is yet another form of colonial thinking.

    150. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Oh, I can think of some. ;-) But nothing racial. Honestly, the racial epithets for white people almost seem...laudatory. It takes a real motherfucker to earn the name "White Devil" for an entire group of people. White guys seem mostly amused..."Yeah, dude, sorry we won that whole colonialism thing."

      I think racial epithets are largely about the cultural history that drives them. You can't piss off a white American by calling them a gringo or a cracker because there's not any kind of sore spot to drive it into; for the past 500 years, guess who's been on the nicer end of the power relations?

      On the other hand, it's really senseless to try to tell people how to feel about a particular symbol. I agree that there may be ways to advance that agenda, but it's not as simple as saying, "Dude, stop caring!" (Or, in the parlance of online gaming, "lol stfu n00b u suck")

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    151. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      I recommend you to read swastika article on Wikipedia to see a large list of innocent swastika current uses, even in Europe.

      Anyway, I understand Xbox decission, and, possibly I would have taken the same.

      But I was arguing that swastika coolness came from Nazis. And also, that nazi interpretation was the normal and commonly held one.

      Before saying it, you should know that asians represent like a 60% of the total population, so, if you need to stablish a position like normal or commonly held, you should take the asiatic view.

    152. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by grumbel · · Score: 1

      The problem is from what I understand (I don't have an Xbox) is that they allow other symbols that are equally as offensive to others.

      The swastika is actually banned by law in a few countries in Europe and every game that makes use of them will be modified before release to have them removed. The latest Wolfenstein got a recall in 2009 because they missed one incarnation of the swastika in the game. Sounds like a good reason to not have them in Xbox Live to avoid conflict with the law, other symbols won't have that issue.

    153. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't change the perception of the image, precisely because it is banned almost everywhere! And to be honest, I don't really grasp why. The argument "oh it was used by the evil evil evil nazis" is bull to me. So what? (...)

      I can only speak for Germany and Austria. Historically, post-war Germany and Austria did not want the symbol used mainly for two reasons: (1) There were still a lot on Nazis, and allowing free use of their major symbol would have meant roaming Nazi gangs brandishing swastikas in the streets (also take into account that basically everything identifiable "nazi" was banned). (2) Allowing its use would be have been an unbearable affront towards the Nazis' victims, and as far as there was a desire to bring these people home (Jews in particular), it would have been impossible if "home" was still full of Nazi symbols.

      Today, things may slowly need to change, but at least in the successor states of the third reich (Germany and Austria) there are still very good reasons to keep the ban. One of which is the fact that neo-nazism is again a serious problem in parts of Germany, and allowing illegal Nazi groups to use Nazi symbols would be illogical on the one hand, and not helpful anyway.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    154. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hjrnunes · · Score: 1

      I agree with last part. It's indeed a non-issue, except for the part where Microsoft starts passing judgements on why people would like to do something that happens to violate ToS and on those same folks. That's what matters. Although I'd like to see if you'd say the same were they ever decide to only allow users to use hate symbols... It would still be their ToS but somehow I have the feeling a lot of people wouldn't take it lightly. And yet your argument would apply.

      Also, for the record, killing everyone that wasn't blonde and blue-eyed was hardly a Nazi ideal. They had plenty of volunteers in their ranks that didn't fit those characteristics, including blacks, muslims, spanish, french, you name it. It's that very exaggeration and disregard for historical accuracy, specially encouraged and kindled by some interest groups that originated and perpetuates this foolish taboo about what is just a symbol with multiple and diverse connotations. In fact, and going yet another bit off topic, the Jew question is pretty much the only thing that distinguishes Nazi Germany from roughly any other war-waging nation in history. But that's a different issue.

      Going back on topic and to conclude, let me give an example of how foolish this symbol taboo can or could be. I happen to play Rome: Total War, with the Europa Barbarorum mod, which strives for realism. Now it's well known that Roman legions displayed swastikas among other symbols in their standarts. This taboo would prevent, in Germany for instance, from people to learn and experience how Roman legions really looked like, instead having a light shallow innocuous version of those same legions. It doesn't amount to much, but it's just a simple example. People should be given the chance to see what things really are and what they mean. Only afterwards can they choose to hate them or love them. To say a symbol is banned is just an eufemism for censorship.

    155. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      Hitler used Christian ideology to support killing Jews, quoted the bible in speeches and was a self proclaimed Christian.

      PS: What's the bet that any responses from enraged Christians will be chock full of 'no true Scotsman' fallacies and bullshit about how he was 'faking it'?

    156. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Those uses are almost exclusively historic. I'll be evil and just paste the TOC in case anyone believes you:

      1 Name
      2 Geometry
      3 Origin hypotheses
      4 Archaeological record
      5 Historical use in the East
      5.1 Hinduism
      5.2 Buddhism
      5.3 Jainism
      5.4 Other Asian traditions
      6 Historical use in the West
      6.1 Antiquity
      6.1.1 Greco-Roman antiquity
      6.1.2 Celtic antiquity
      6.1.3 Germanic antiquity
      6.2 Pre-Christian Europe and folk culture
      6.2.1 Baltic
      6.2.2 Slavic
      6.2.3 Finnic
      6.3 Medieval and early modern Europe
      7 Native American traditions
      8 Western use in the early 20th century
      9 As the symbol of Nazism
      10 Post-WWII stigmatization in Western countries
      10.1 Germany
      10.2 European Union
      10.3 Legislation in other European countries
      10.4 Latin America
      10.5 Media
      10.6 Satirical use
      10.7 Controversies over pre-1930 designs
      10.8 Controversies over Asian products
      11 Contemporary use in Asia
      11.1 South Asia
      11.2 East Asia
      11.3 Central Asia
      12 New religious movements
      13 See also
      14 References
      14.1 Bibliography
      14.2 Notes
      15 External links

      > But I was arguing that swastika coolness came from Nazis. And also, that nazi interpretation was the normal and commonly held one.

      No, you were not. At least not in http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1881716&cid=34329620 which I replied to.

      > Before saying it, you should know that asians represent like a 60% of the total population, so, if you need to stablish a position like normal or commonly held, you should take the asiatic view.

      "it"? If you count Indians towards the Asian population, see my post above. If not, I don't see how you arrive at 60%. Also, Chinese and Mongolians see the swastika as a symbol for nazi/racism, same as the Asian parts of the Russian Federation.
      Implying that there is a truly global common view means you need to get down to the truly basic things; way more basic than a swastika. And even then, many Chinese would argue that maintaining unity and peace is more important that free expression or, in fact, human life.

    157. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Swastika is not just an eastern symbol, it was used throughout the world, it has been found in an archaeological context in Britain, Germany, Finland, Greece, Rome, France and all over Asia. it was also used by Native Americans. So to call it an evil NAZI symbol or an eastern religious symbol, kind of misses the point. The Swastika is part of the heritage of almost every culture on earth. it predates the Jewsish culture and Egyptian hieroglyphics. The fact that the symbol is used by Hindus and Jains now, or was used by NAZIs 65 years ago, kind of narrows the scope of just how important the Swastika is, if only in a historical context. Not to mention the issues this raises for other symbols. Is it ok for me to kill with Jewish insignia? What about Muslim symbols? Will they ban red dots because of the Japanese treatment of POWs and civilians? It just seems wrong!

    158. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Your post became invalid when you compared a symbol to child rape.

      No, I did not. I compared a symbol to a picture. Words mean something, geekoid, and I know you know that.

      I was responding to someone who said he "doesn't really get offended by mere words or pictures" and I called bullshit on him.

      And for the record, I can find a hell of a lot more atrocity done by people where crosses then swastica.

      But there has also been significant good done by people displaying crosses, for example, charity hospitals all over the world. The balance of good vs bad for people displaying crosses is approximately the same balance you'd find across humankind.

      On the other hand, except for their thoroughness, attention to detail and very snappy uniforms, you're not going to find a lot of "good" that's been done by Nazis or those promoting Nazi iconography. I'll be charitable and say that your false equivalence between Nazis and Christians is probably something that you didn't think through. It's either that or you are one dumb sonofabitch, geekoid, and I'm prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    159. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'war against the swastika as a symbol' that this entire thread has been discussing maybe?

      He was saying "how can folk get so pissed over something so trivial when there's real shit happening somewhere?". Its an old question, with the same answer as usual, this sort of shit is much easier to think about and less traumatising than something as real as war.

      But good job projecting your own thoughts onto his post - I'm sure you'll succeed in baiting someone into the argument you're looking for.

    160. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What happens now?

      So now you get to ban me from your little online community. I'm surprised you had to ask.

      When the XBox Live people decided to ban the use of swastikas, they made a choice. Now people can decide whether they want to be part of an online community that does not allow swastika avatars or not.

      This is not complicated. It's not a matter of free speech and it's not a matter of censorship. It's a matter of owners of online communities being able to set community standards, and then users being able to decide whether or not to participate.

      Personally, I don't believe in buying hardware that requires me become a member of an online community and adopt standards. It's why I don't buy any hardware that operates behind a walled garden as long as I have a choice in the matter.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    161. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, there are still many, many people who were affected by WW2 in some way, and they don't give a monkey's about what the swastika *used* to be used for

      Which is a shame really. What they should do is embrace the swastika, take it back to its roots and cause it to lose the power it has.

      Sorta like what blacks and gays did with nigger and fag. Posting anon for somewhat obvious reasons.

    162. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The action itself is what is offensive, not the picture. Getting offended changes nothing. You're taking it to an extreme, however.

      The organization that the swastika represents were also known to "take it to an extreme" if I remember correctly.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    163. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      'standards' and 'arbitrary' do not equate, and you well know it.

    164. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really curious to learn how/why any modern society would even consider using that symbol, knowing the complete history behind it and how horribly offensive it is to a sizable portion of the world's population.

      Because they've been using it for centuries and Europe is on the other side of the world? When I visited Japan, I saw the swastika on maps a lot.

      Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Presidential_Standard_of_Finland.svg

    165. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1

      Totally! Because when I play with other randomly-matched, pseudoanonymous gamers online, I'm always stuck that they're universally thoughtful, polite people. Wow, from the noise everyone makes, you'd think that online gaming was dominated by immature, racist, sexist, homophobic, assholes who delight in trolling. I remember just yesterday playing against Neeg4hk1ll4h yesterday and seeing his swastika and thinking, "I appreciate it when a polite British young man* tries to spread the Buddhist word of peace." (* That he was a young man was obvious from his speech. I learned that he was British and polite when repeatedly offered me a cigarettes and bundles of sticks.")

    166. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by sorak · · Score: 1

      If you saw a KKK bumper sticker on someone's car, would you:

      1. Assume he's a racist
      2. Say "hmm, let's google the KKK and see if there is some group, somewhere who doesn't see them as racist"
      3. Say "Ah ha! The Klan was originally a patriotic and religious organization who, at one time tried to reinvent themselves as a group that promotes pride in one's cultural heritage! Thank you for educating those who pass you on the freeway!"
      4. Wonder if he is actually a foreign individual from a country where the KKK stands for something entirely different, and chastise the rest of the country for not having an in-depth understanding of this foreign culture.

      I'm just wondering how much research you expect people to do when they see controversial symbols in random places?

    167. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Don't be a prick.

    168. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by sorak · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the in-game context makes it worse. The "bad guys" are not a form of self-expression on the part of the developers or the players, but the profile pic is, and the context (military conflict shortly after WWII) makes it seem more likely that the symbol worn by the guy who just shot you is a reference to Nazis, rather than Buddhists.

    169. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Zarel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been more clear. The local flea markets and local temple were local to my home back in China, before I moved to the US.

      However, I find your tone a bit unnerving. I did say "I'm not saying that banning swastikas in Xbox Live was a bad decision. It was probably the correct decision, especially if the majority of the Xbox Live users in question are American - though I agree with metrix007 that this guy could have had a better tone about it."

      Again, I was disagreeing with the guy acting like the swastika-Nazism association was universal. I had nothing wrong with the premise of TFA.

      --
      Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
    170. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Seems I replied to the wrong post. Another post (can't find it) was likening the US occupation of Afghanistan to that of Nazi Germany.

      People who do that need a serious dose of perspective.

    171. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Zarel · · Score: 1

      There are many replies making this point, so I'll just reply to this one.

      The swastika was indeed associated with good luck in the West as well, which is why I said "didn't have as much meaning" rather than "had no meaning". The idea I was trying to get across was that the association was much weaker, though. The swastika in the East is a religious symbol with thousands of years of history. In the West, it was much more minor.

      It's like the Christian cross. The Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition used that symbol and killed tons of people, but the cross has not lost its meaning. If the Spanish Inquisition had used, say, four-leaf clovers, instead, though, modern St. Patrick's Day would probably not use that motif.

      --
      Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
    172. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Zarel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I agree with everything you said, and with your original post as well. I just wanted to reply because you asked "When's the last time you saw a swastika?" and the last time I had seen a swastika, it had nothing to do with Nazi Germany.

      And also because I, too, would love to see the swastika reclaimed to its original meaning of good fortune in the West, and educating users on Slashdot is certainly a valid avenue. :D

      --
      Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
    173. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If you read his blog post, he knows the background of the symbol and his "other than Nazi" meanings perfectly well. That is not at issue at all.

      The issue, simply put, is this: when you see a crude swastika scribbled on the wall, is the first thought on your mind, "oh, it's some Buddhist willing to share his happiness with the world", or is it "fucking Nazis again"?

      That's really all there is to it.

    174. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the article.

      I agree with his decision.

      Yes, he does emphasize context. It's in the title, as is "Internet niche knowledge."

      Dunno how a religious symbol recognizeable, though not always used, by a billion people is "niche knowledge".

      None of the organizations I worked for would consider his attitude appropriate for customer service or public discussion.

      And the swastika is not universally a bad symbol, even in the free world. Context, remember?

    175. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      'standards' and 'arbitrary' do not equate

      What part of "We don't allow Nazi symbols for use as avatars" do you find "arbitrary"?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    176. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Getting offended changes nothing.

      Not to mention it just feeds the trolls. The best thing to do is just ignore it, if they are indeed trolling then this reaction gives them exactly what they are after, if it is just ignored then eventually society will be desensitized to it and it will have no power as a symbol of evil.

    177. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but for fucks sake don't let context ruin your ignorance.

      The context is clear. It's in the title, as is the phrase "Internet niche knowledge" which is how he describes anybody who is aware that a billion plus people see the symbol differently, despite there being a billion plus who do, and a popular mainstream movie (daVinci Code) indicating so and yes, some people did learn it in school.

      All the guy had to do was say no and show a little respect in his explanation.

    178. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Why Nazi symbols, and not others?

      Are we to believe that the Third Reich has Xbox Live accounts? Wouldn't any surviving Nazis be a tad old for such games?

    179. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      But not the swastika itself.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    180. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why Nazi symbols, and not others?

      Because the swastika is a very singular symbol in contemporary iconography. It has zero positive connotation. Zero redeeming value. Zero chance for being "misunderstood". Its associations are so negative in fact, that if you use a swastika to represent you online, it is reasonable to exclude you from being part of the mainstream. The swastika is a radioactive symbol.

      Are we to believe that the Third Reich has Xbox Live accounts?

      Probably not. But there are certainly plenty of groups and individuals who use the swastika as a representative icon, and those groups overwhelmingly hold values that most people find repulsive.

      Bob, you're arguing a very weak position.

      Number One: Microsoft owns XBox Live.

      Number Two: Microsoft doesn't want to encourage people who identify with Nazis to join XBox Live, since most people find people who identify with Nazis as repulsive. "Repulsive" is not good for business if you want to be a mainstream organization.

      Number Three: As the owner of XBox Live, Microsoft is completely within its rights to ask people not to use swastikas as avatars, since swastikas represent very real and very very bad things.

      Similarly, Microsoft could certainly say that if you use abusive racial epithets, you will be banned. In fact, a swastika is to symbols what abusive racial epithets are to words.

      It's a good business decision by XBox Live. People are still free to carve swastikas into their foreheads if they wish. And communities are free to shun people who do so.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    181. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commonly held in America you mean. Ask people in Japan, Mongolia or other nations which are not christian and see what they think. In maps in Tokyo the Swastika is a symbol for a temple. The maps are littered with them.

    182. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by shnull · · Score: 0

      swastika symbol did really exist before there was a national socialist party in germany, it probably existed before there was a crucified jew, what a load of crap, if i decide to name my son adolf, will he become evil for sure, or because people point out he shares his name with a long dead dictator ?

      --
      beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
    183. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by richlv · · Score: 1

      it is cool because it is banned. anything banned will draw more attention to it.

      personally, i don't think nazi german marches are particularly interesting musically or otherwise (well, maybe as an amusement factor) - but long time ago i downloaded and listened to them... because some people somewhere on the internet said i shouldn't.

      swastika additionally is interesting, because it's not just asia - a variant of it has been long known and used in latvia as a thundercross. latvian pagan metal band skyforger every now and then has to educate people who kave no idea about the symbol being centuries old and with massively positive meaning...
      http://skyforger.lv/en/index.php?main_page_id=40&page_type=text

      they supposedly were "forced" to remove thundercross from their logo (http://www.metal-archives.com/band.php?id=2776):

      "Despite accusations of being politically influenced, Skyforger is merely devoted to the ancient history and pagan mythology of its home country, without any visible signs of political leaning. The band has removed the Latvian thunder cross from its logo because of repeated misunderstandings."

      and you know what ? lots and lots of young people will be drawn to swastikas, nazi marches and other stuff JUST because it is banned. but maybe that is the goal - to have a constant inner enemy, just like usa needs "terror" to fight.

      --
      Rich
    184. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by richlv · · Score: 1

      for latvians (a country in europe, just in case), a variant of swastika has been known for a long, long time as thundercross - and thunder being the main pagan god, that was a sign of protection (from thunder and all evil) and was used on clothing, belts, doorways...

      so for me it's more a sign of how one can taint a symbol in the minds of many, and it's also a symbol of stupidity - because by banning the nazi swastika gains more meaning and is more attractive.

      --
      Rich
    185. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by richlv · · Score: 1

      i'll plug again the fact that a variant of swastika has been long known and used as a protection symbol in latvia. also, if you would like to see the symbol reclaimed... the only way to do so is lift the stupid ban and allow people to talk about it and use it.
      if somebody will use it in a nazi fashion, they will expose themselves as an idiot. let them. i'd better find out about idiots sooner than let them gather, feel cool by using banned symbols (because banning makes them cool) and then go crazy.

      --
      Rich
    186. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      Those uses are almost exclusively historic.

      There is some examples of current uses even in Europe. I can't cite them right now as it could be seen as NSFW, but if you read the right paragraphs, you will find them.

      No, you were not. At least not in http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1881716&cid=34329620 [slashdot.org] which I replied to.

      In that comment I really was talking about swastika coolnes origin. The normal and commonly held is discussed in other parts, but I think it's present on the entire discussion.

      "it"?

      I'm sorry if the sentence is wrong. English is not my native language, and I commit some errors. I bet that was not the only one.

      If you count Indians towards the Asian population, see my post above.

      Of course I count Indians. But Wikipedia says that swastika is a common motive in indian clothes. Again, I cannot open it, but search for the Zara controversy.

      Also, Chinese and Mongolians see the swastika as a symbol for nazi/racism

      Depending of the context. I don't think a swastika in a temple would be seen that way.

      Implying that there is a truly global common view means you need to get down to the truly basic things;

      I'm implying the opposite. You can't talk about the normal or the commonly held view. Even less if you associate that view with western one.

      And even then, many Chinese would argue that maintaining unity and peace is more important that free expression or, in fact, human life.

      It's possible (but we can't know as free speech doesn't exist in China). That wouldn't mean that they're right, obviously. I will still consider that human life is more precious than nations. The majority isn't always right.

      But I won't agree with anyone staying that free expression is more important than unity is the commonly held view.

    187. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      I was developing an embedded system for a road-roller. A core-dump in a data structure make the road-roller roll over 10 cute puppies. The symbol of that data structure was realityimpaired. Please don't use this symbol as your /. username.

      thanks

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    188. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I read the Da Vinci Code too. Controversy is expensive for business. It doesn't matter whats right or wrong to them. Symbols don't require context. Context is helpful in understanding the conveyed message, but it is up to the reader to interpreting it. And at that point you can't guess what they will think. The most insulting part about the misinterpretation is that they are completely different symbols. It is like hating the character 'd' because you hate the character 'b'.

    189. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be one of those guys but by the article's logic the Christian cross should definitely be banned. The crusades (among other Christian wars) were just as bad as WWII. Maybe not in total numbers but in scale. The only meaningful difference between them is time. Time to forget. Time to stop caring. Don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing for the Nazi symbol to be used - but censoring is a slippery slope and there's a reason that freedom of expression (or freedom of speech) is a protected write in many countries.

    190. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I am currently with XBOX Live and I use a sauvastika (left facing swastika) as my personal symbol. I used the Xbox camera to take the photo of it. I have XBOX Live for many years and no problem.

    191. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      You are obviously educated heck a lot of people around here are smart enough to know that the Swastika wasn't always used for that. I think a large number of those educated people would also be smart enough to realize that the large demographic for these games even if it is rated M for mature aren't mature/educated enough to distinguish the difference between the two symboles.

      Well tough shit for them. Why should we have to sink to the level of the lowest common denominator?

      Unless, of course, the issue isn't really about insensitive Internet pedants being a pain in the ass, but about Microsoft wanting to prevent stupid, uneducated people from quitting XBox Live because they got (wrongly) offended.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    192. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      How about this symbol? Is it cool to use because people aren't as familiar with it?

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/KKK-symbol.jpg

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    193. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then, go ahead and get offended.

    194. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by brkello · · Score: 1

      What planet do you live on? You may not find the swastika offensive, but many find it deeply offensive. Just like using the word nigger. Some things are more taboo than others. Where is the line drawn? That's up to the company to decide. But the whole slippery slope argument has always been a stupid one. Just because they ban swastika doesn't mean they are going to ban pedobear. Just because you are a self-righteous douche that thinks you know better than everyone else doesn't mean that the rest of society can't come to a consensus that certain things are offensive to the general populace.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    195. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The expression is "hear, hear" which is short for "hear him, hear him." Saying "here, here" is just idiotic.

    196. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, science AND logic fail! Good job. Anecdotes CANNOT be evidence. There is NO control to allow one to determine the true cause and effect of the event. An anecdote would be you giving your child a particular cold remedy and telling everyone how wonderful it is because your child soon became well. That information about the remedy is completely worthless, even if ALL your friends did the same and got the same results. You simply cannot tell what caused your child to get well.

    197. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by hjrnunes · · Score: 1

      Your argument doesn't hold. That society has reached a consensus is something you'll have to prove. I have never seen or heard about even one public rally or manifestation for the banning of swastikas.
      I have never seen one politician making the ban of swastikas a campaigning issue.

      What I've seen is groups of politicians pushing for such bans. Proposing and passing ban laws after they're in power. More often than not, those same politicians are the ones that support and promote unjust and unfair, misery bringing, pain inflicting wars upon their own and foreign peoples. Even when large parts of society cry out in disagreement in massive rallies with thousands of people. So much for the value of consensus.

      So it seems that the self-righteous douches that think they are worth and know better than everyone else is you and all those that support such politicians. Hiding and banning shit out, even on the grounds that some people find it offensive is still censorship. And a symbol is just something that's there. Nigger is something you call someone else, and only in a subset of all the possible combinations of people calling others nigger is such act interpreted as offensive and disrespectful. And in an ironic twist, that word that was a symbol of racism against blacks became a symbol of resistance against that very same racism that coined it, and you can hear it almost every day on television. As the blacks so eloquently have shown, there are much better ways of dealing with offensive symbols than banning them.

      So, you get out of your own little world where you can hide all the baddy things that make you shiver and tremble of fear at night, and accept the fact that you live in a global world, and that what offends you might be what delights others, not because they mean any harm, but because they are different from yourself and have different experiences.

    198. Re:Hmmm, don't really like the guys tone by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I reread it and it seems I and at least one other read it the same way. To say there's no intended metaphor comparing the US to Nazi Germany due to our current foreign policy is simply disingenuous.

      The guy's disdain for the current US foreign policy is clouding his judgment. Americans reel in horror over the image of the swastika because it symbolizes the greatest human atrocity of the past half millennium. You can be politically opposed to Iraq/Afgah wars, but to put them on the same level as that what the swastika symbolizes just makes my point: dude needs some perspective.

  2. The reality by Y-Crate · · Score: 3, Funny

    "This isn't gonna stop until Pictionary bans the word 'windmill.' "

  3. Context and intent by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the symbol (and the name) are older, there are many ways to draw the original symbol that barely or superficially resemble the Nazi emblem: From orientation (right or left-facing; the Nazi flag always faced right) to the rotation (the Nazi flag stands on end at a 45% angle) to the color (the Nazi flag is red-white-black).

    That implies a hazy line, but it redefines the offense as one of intent, context and of what a reasonable observer would see.

    If you draw something like this, you can use the "traditional symbol of luck" defense; if you draw this, then it's a fairly obvious lie.

    1. Re:Context and intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can discuss freedom of speech, intent or degree of offensiveness all you want. In the end it boils down to:

      Do they want to risk getting hit with the official banhammer in countries like Germany and lose that market for showing swastikas in-game?

      Oh and it wouldn't just be the inconvenient "for the children" banhammer but the nasty "symbols of unconstitutional organisations" banhammer which is also a criminal offense.

    2. Re:Context and intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't see how anyone in this day and age could be insulted by a symbol.
      Somewhat ontopic, Have you seen zer new high efficiency microwave oven? Nein? It seats twelve.

    3. Re:Context and intent by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      The left-facing swastika is a very common symbol in various Buddhist related religions. There are many temples around Asia that are completely covered in them.

      Actually I once heard the tale that the swastika comes in two types: left and right facing. The left facing shows good luck, the right facing bad luck. The tale didn't elaborate on why the Nazis chose the right-facing one... it didn't help them much at least.

    4. Re:Context and intent by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      From what I read, single-player games sometimes get an edition where that stuff is removed (also, blood color mods, but that might also be in American versions to get a lower rating), so it can be sold here.

      The same also applies to in-game content for multi-player games (after all, textures and stuff doesn't need to be transmitted over the network), but not to user-created content like avatars - so yeah, their decision on this actually makes sense.

    5. Re:Context and intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      single-player games sometimes get an edition where that stuff is removed

      Yea, big action games are usually censored in Germany because of our idiotic youth-protection laws. The word "sometimes" is a crass understatement.

      However, that's only really enforceable for fixed content provided by the publisher. As you mentioned, if players get to introduce their own content in the form of logos, it's easier to just outright ban them instead of trying to implement a complex filtering and image recognition system (whose potential ineffectiveness would put them at legal risk).

      The usual ESRB argument "online interaction is unrated" does not fly here. Ratings for games are mandatory and anti-Nazi laws are non-negotiable.

      Web-sites regularly get into trouble for user-created content because legally they are often responsible for the content posted by others (mostly because judges still utterly fail to understand how the web works).

    6. Re:Context and intent by pookemon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep - and I'm sure that ALL the players using the swastika in COD:Blops are using it as a sign of good (or bad) luck. Especially the ones (that I have seen in game) with the "[NAZI]" clan tags.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    7. Re:Context and intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you draw something like this, you can use the "traditional symbol of luck" defense; if you draw this, then it's a fairly obvious lie.

      Yes, but chances are if you're playing Call of Duty and using a "Swastika-like" symbol, that you're a 13-year-old white kid just trying to be a dick - not some enlightened Buddhist wishing luck on your fellow players.

      Though, I still think they should be able to use whatever symbol they'd like. But there needs to be a way for people to filter things they don't want to see.
      How about banning the users if they don't tag their image as swastika-luck-sign? That way, anyone not wanting to see it can filter.

      Free speech may let you say what you want, but it doesn't mean you get to force people to listen.

    8. Re:Context and intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid you might be wrong. I bet that if you draw the symbol of luck you've linked to you will be banned from XBox live.

    9. Re:Context and intent by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Do they want to risk getting hit with the official banhammer in countries like Germany and lose that market for showing swastikas in-game?

      Then, maybe they should say so, rather than insulting people who hold different views?

    10. Re:Context and intent by qc_dk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can draw something very close to the second and still claim the defense. It was after all a common symbol in Scandinavia. Carlsberg, the Danish beer company, used it as their logo until the symbol became too tied with thoughts of a rather aggressive southern neighbour. The Finnish air force had it as their symbol, and recently, at their anniversary, you could buy swastika rings. A Swedish noble family has it as their coat of arms. Incidentally that is where the nazis got their inspiration.

      The fact is that banning the use of swastikas is ignorant, prejudiced and hypocrisy. Isn't the COD series originally based on WW2, with the possibility of people impersonating nazis for their gaming enjoyment? So you can play nazis for fun, but you cannot use a 4000+ year old symbol because the nazis also used it?

    11. Re:Context and intent by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      The left-facing swastika is a very common symbol in various Buddhist related religions. There are many temples around Asia that are completely covered in them.

      Actually I once heard the tale that the swastika comes in two types: left and right facing. The left facing shows good luck, the right facing bad luck. The tale didn't elaborate on why the Nazis chose the right-facing one... it didn't help them much at least.

      It is not as simple as that. The right-facing swastika in Hinduism is the most common, and represents evolution of the universe, material luck etc. The left facing represents involution, spiritual looking inward, physical austerity, etc.

    12. Re:Context and intent by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah maybe they should allow people to replace the logos.

      Then people who are offended by nazi swastikas can either replace what they see manually, or join a group where you would see different logos for players who use nazi swastikas as their logos.

      --
    13. Re:Context and intent by Urkki · · Score: 1

      I don't see how anyone in this day and age could be insulted by a symbol.

      It's not the symbol itself, it's what using it implies. Either the user is ignorant of history (not insulting, but unlikely, and fixable), or the person tries to make fun of events that happened under that symbol, or the person actually thinks there's something cool about it. You can always say "but I have my own meaning for that symbol!", but that only goes so far: saying "I have may own meaning for 'Fire! Fire!'" after causing a deadly stampede in a movie theatre is no excuse.

      There's a large chunk of people, whose grandparents and parents suffered from acts done under that symbol. Most native Europeans older than around 70 have personal memories of it, even.

    14. Re:Context and intent by DrXym · · Score: 1
      And if you draw this you come from the Isle of Man. Versions of the symbol have legs going the other way too. I'm sure someone would take umbrage with it, and of course the Nazis co-opted the triskelion too, e.g. here.

      So some common sense has to be applied. In most cases I expect it is very clear what the intent is from the logo.

    15. Re:Context and intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The line isn't the symbol, it's between In Character and Out Of Character. For comparison, nobody objects to Taliban being a playable side in a game. If a player who really liked to play them used an avatar celebrating 9/11, that would somewhat cross the line between the game and real life.

  4. It's unnecessarily inflammatory by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No one is playing the "Super Hindus" when they use the swastika. It is an inflammatory icon with specific anti-Semitic meaning.

    Its use ought to be banned, just as if a group called themselves the "Jew gassers" and tried to claim it was a tribute to a wacky Israeli troupe.

    Should anything offensive be banned? Well, MS has decided that they will cater to the lowest common denominator, so that means nothing offensive. These rules are indicated up front, so you don't really have a case that you didn't know about the rules.

    1. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The symbol has been used by far more than Hindus. My Native American friend has a swastika symbol hanging in his living room and a Taiwanese monk friend of mine gave me a bracelet that has beads which contain engraved swastikas.

    2. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      And your point is that in-game as an icon it would not be offensive because, despite its primary association with the murder of 6 million Jews by the Nazi regime, the symbol can also be associated with other meanings?

    3. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure. So the reason why, for example, the Japanese use this symbol on maps, not to pinpoint the locations of buddhist temples, but of concentration camps. You pillock.
      Here, start educating yourself. Start reading from here onward : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika#Controversies_over_Asian_products

    4. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm sorry. Were we discussing the iconography of temples in the game?

      No? Then go fuck yourself.

    5. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

      No one is playing the "Super Hindus" when they use the swastika.

      I play the great warrior Arjun you insensitive clod

    6. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      No one is playing the "Super Hindus" when they use the swastika. It is an inflammatory icon with specific anti-Semitic meaning.

      Its use ought to be banned, just as if a group called themselves the "Jew gassers" and tried to claim it was a tribute to a wacky Israeli troupe.

      Should anything offensive be banned? Well, MS has decided that they will cater to the lowest common denominator, so that means nothing offensive. These rules are indicated up front, so you don't really have a case that you didn't know about the rules.

      I think some cultural imperialism is present here. I suspect that if someone wanted the cross banned because of the Nazi's use of the Iron cross, or the crusades they would not have much luck

    7. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that because in Asia the symbol is associated with buddhist temples, nobody on XBox Live (in a different continent with a different culture) will take offence? Or are you suggesting that anyone who wants to use that logo also provides the text from Wikipedia?

    8. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't its primary association in the entire world. My point is that this restriction is grounded in a purely uncultured, white western view.

      I could say the same thing you said about the Christian cross and my Native American friend would say the same about the flag of the USA.

    9. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      It's definitely biased towards Western culture, but that may have more to do with its primary market than anything else.

      I'm not so sure MS is out there trying to cram Western culture down the throat of every gamer. They simply only have their own cultural signposts to guide them. If you were to make a convincing argument that a particular icon was terribly offensive in another culture, I'm sure they'd update their list of banned iconography.

    10. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Then why are you arguing? That's exactly the point I ascribed to you.

    11. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if a group called themselves the "Jew gassers"

      In Luxembourg, there is a small village which has a road called "Judde Gas" (Jew Gas). Of course, in Luxembourgish, "Gas" also means "small road", but after WWII, it's still a bizarre name. Strangely enough, the name hasn't been changed...

    12. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Maybe because they arent banning the American Flag, or the Christian cross.

      They are only banning something offensive to a specific group of people, and giving the finger to all the others.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    13. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is playing the "Super Hindus" when they use the swastika.

      And your point is that in-game as an icon it would not be offensive because, despite its primary association with the murder of 6 million Jews by the Nazi regime

      No it isn't. You presented a generalization that all people associated swastikas with the murder of jews. How do you know that people who don't associate it the same way you do won't be playing the game? There are plenty of non-whites, non-westerners and culturally informed people who play video games too, you know?

      It looks like you're trying to backpedal your argument.

    14. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of non-whites, non-westerners and culturally informed people who play video games too, you know?

      That also want to use the swastika? No. I do not know. Prove it.

      Find a player who uses the swastika in a non-Nazi meaning, who uses it consistently, and who uses it in a way that represents a culture he identifies with and not just for the sake of being contrary.

      Such a player does not exist.

    15. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. You presented a generalization that all people associated swastikas with the murder of jews. How do you know that people who don't associate it the same way you do won't be playing the game? There are plenty of non-whites, non-westerners and culturally informed people who play video games too, you know?

      Oh crap. A load of spotty teenagers creating swastika icons in a video game. Of course they are using it for the Nazi link, you'd have to be a complete cretin to believe otherwise.

    16. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some cultural imperialism

      Welcome to the XX century

      Oh wait...

    17. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      In Luxembourg, there is a small village which has a road called "Judde Gas" (Jew Gas). Of course, in Luxembourgish, "Gas" also means "small road"

      But the translation wouldn't be "Jew Gas" though, it'd be "Jew Road" (which is better, but still doesn't sound all that great really).

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    18. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by powerlord · · Score: 1

      In Luxembourg, there is a small village which has a road called "Judde Gas" (Jew Gas). Of course, in Luxembourgish, "Gas" also means "small road", but after WWII, it's still a bizarre name. Strangely enough, the name hasn't been changed...

      Probably was where the Jews of Luxembourg lived.

      Think "China Town" that lots of East/West coast cities have.

      Of course, post WWII when most/all of the Jews that lived there had been hauled off and executed, it probably lost its meaning, but at that point it had "Historical Significance" and never got changed.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    19. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're banning something that's likely to result in arguments and bitching and will generally lead to a rubbish experience for everyone else. If you want to use the symbol in its wider meaning, all well and good, but don't use it on a service which has a primarily american and european user base, knowing full well that some people won't understand and will therefore take offence, because doing so makes you little more than a troll. You're saying they should have respect for other cultures, but this is about people going into an environment with a very heavily western culture where this symbol is generally frowned upon and then whining because they can't have things their own way, that's the opposite of the standpoint you're preaching.

    20. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by delinear · · Score: 1

      Not only that, he'd need to either be completely ignorant of its alternative meaning or not care that he was using it in an environment where people are likely to take offence. If the former is the case then he's not really culturally informed (or rather, he is but only for a narrow spectrum of global culture), if it's the latter then he's acting himself from a standpoint of intolerance to other people's views, it would be highly hypocritical of him to then complain people were being intolerant of his views.

    21. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      You're saying they should have respect for other cultures

      I didnt say that at all. I said that they are not being consistently sensitive to cultures. They have singled out only those of Jewish faith for special consideration.

      Its called discrimination.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    22. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes on my iPod Touch lists the Beatles song 'Hey Jude' as 'Hey J**e'.

    23. Re:It's unnecessarily inflammatory by richlv · · Score: 1

      or maybe swastika is also anti-homosexual symbol ?
      i guess the problem is, homosexuals didn't shout as loud and didn't get their own country. oh, and they didn't call anybody whom they didn't like "anti-sexualist" :)

      --
      Rich
  5. Buddhists would disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since the swastika is much older than the german bastardization of it.

    1. Re:Buddhists would disagree by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buddhists would say that the meaning of the icon lies in the mind of the one ascribes the meaning to it. Therefore the icon has no intrinsic meaning in and of itself and thus they would have no problem finding another meaningless icon to use in its place.

    2. Re:Buddhists would disagree by cappp · · Score: 1

      The problem is that we're not, as a species, able to dissociate symbol from meaning. Our entire lives are spent navigating symbols and meanings and interpreting the subtle, subconscious, or merely obtuse. I've heard it described as us being "Homo Narrans" i.e. storytelling animals. The fact of the matter is simply that we tell stories - our lives and histories are processes of constant narrative using common cultural symbols as shared points of understanding. The swastika is a symbol that has become embedded with significant cultural short-hand and its impossible for people to divorce that specific alignment of lines from historical events.

    3. Re:Buddhists would disagree by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Buddhists strive to make that dissociation, but that's their issue, not the one at hand.

      You are absolutely right. The question becomes whether one culture's significant artifact is better or has more importance than another's. Does the cultural significance of the Nazi swastika imbue the non-Nazi swastika with the same negative connotations of the former? As the blog writer said, it depends on context.

      However, the context here is the XBox servers and the game playing public who accesses these servers. MS has decided which icons are unacceptable, and they have used Western culture as the context for most of their decisions.

      Right or wrong, in Western culture, the swastika has a very specific negative meaning. It is one of hatred, murder, and intimidation.

    4. Re:Buddhists would disagree by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Buddhists would say that the meaning of the icon lies in the mind of the one ascribes the meaning to it. Therefore the icon has no intrinsic meaning in and of itself and thus they would have no problem finding another meaningless icon to use in its place.

      That cuts both ways - you can count on the neo-nazis just using other symbols in response to the ban too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Buddhists would disagree by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      It's a good way to separate the wheat from the chaff. The idiot kids who do it to be edgy change their icons to something else. The idiot neo-Nazis change theirs to be another WP symbol.

      All the better to see you with, my dear.

    6. Re:Buddhists would disagree by mlk · · Score: 1

      Does a common Western icon exist which has large negative connotations in say Asian or African Culture?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    7. Re:Buddhists would disagree by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Snooki?

      Actually, I'd be interested to know that too. I don't know.

    8. Re:Buddhists would disagree by Ben4jammin · · Score: 1

      It is only impossible if you believe it to be impossible. We all have the freedom to create/destroy/change ANY association we make. What is impossible is for the brain to think itself into something that it can't also think itself out of.

      BadAnalogyGuy is accurate in what he says. When we forget that what is in our head is only an internal representation of external things (a PARTIAL representation) and that it is only one of many possible representations then we lose the ability to relate to other representations.

      Put another way, as other posters have mentioned, why should what one culture did for a couple of decades with this symbol override what another culture did with it for a much longer time? You do NOT have to think of Nazis when you view the symbol. You MAY...but you don't HAVE to. You are making a choice regardless of how aware you are of that choice.

    9. Re:Buddhists would disagree by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose from the point of view of Buddhist psychology you're right as far as you go, but you're missing quite a bit. "Right Speech" is the third item of the "Eightfold Path", right after "Right Intention" and before even "Right Action".

      The Buddha explained "Right Speech" as consisting of the following elements:

      1. abstention from false or deceitful speech.

      2. abstention from slanderous or malicious speech.

      3. abstention from words that hurt or offend others.

      4. abstention from purposeless chatter.

      Note how little the state of mind or semiotic opinions of the speaker come into this. The Buddhist must consider the rightness of his speech by its effects on others. Speech that coerces (through deceit), belittles (through slander), wounds (through insensitivity or hostility), or even *distracts* other people is wrong in Buddhist ethics. Notably, wrong speech is wrong not just because it harms others; it also thwarts the speaker's attempts to liberate himself from falsehood, malice and trivial obsessions. It makes sense that it comes on the list between "Right Intent" and "Right Action". Wrong speech undoes the ethical perspective gained from "Right View" and "Right Intent" before it can even be translated into action.

      So, your opinion about what a symbol *could* mean or *ought to* mean is ethically irrelevant when you know very well it will (a) offend some people and (b) waste the time of others.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Buddhists would disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it not the job of a Buddha to bring people out of ignorance and fear? To help people overcome their delusions?

    11. Re:Buddhists would disagree by geekoid · · Score: 1

      true, but irrelevant. A real buddhist wouldn't be playing video games about war.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  6. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop. Please, just stop.

  7. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    are you sure about that? i am sure we have killed many hundreds of thousands of folk over the years unnecessarily. But millions? i'm not so sure. And war wise, i can't think of many major wars against black people. Normally they were against european nations in other places. Admittedly there was Sudan and currently Afghanistan. Anyway, i'm just not sure of our facts. It sounds great, fighting talk and all, but i suspect you may be wrong.

  8. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nope. I'm a 'brown' person whose country used to be ruled by the Brits. Yes, they unjustly killed tens of thousands (e.g. the Jalianwala Bagh massacre).

    However, the Nazis were far worse... 2-3 orders of magnitude worse. The Nazis killed hundreds of thousands of browns as well (e.g. Roma).

    There is no comparison. Ban the Nazis!

  9. Sounds like an overreaction to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't think of another time in history when someone was so repressive.

    1. Re:Sounds like an overreaction to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean now?

  10. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hundreds of thousands? Sure. But MILLIONS? You're gonna have to show me some math.

  11. Symbols have power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nazi regime accomplished, besides killing millions of innocent people, to pervert the meaning of a previously harmless symbol. It is now a symbol of inhumane bestiality. Worldwide. This might seem a pretty cool feat to gamers, especially in the context of a war game. I mean, hey, who doesn't want to be the evil overlord for a little while? On the other hand, the attempt to appear dangerous and rebellious by rubbing off the image of evilness seems a little ridiculous to me. In my opinion, the use of the swastika should not be forbidden, it should be made fun of. Oh, and http://ipostr.com/pic-632-Sieg-Fail

    1. Re:Symbols have power by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, the use of the swastika should not be forbidden, it should be made fun of.

      I agree with the sentiment. Having forbidden symbols increases their power rather than decrease. Then again, I would keep hatespeach as a bannable offence. I would think that eventually (perhaps years and years) the neo-nazis couldn't use it as a symbol as it wouldn't have the same effect anymore.

      --
      It is what it is.
  12. Context is kinda why I can see it would be used by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

    Not played it (yet), but considering it's a game about running around and shooting each other...
    Doesn't seem out of context if one side, being the bad-guys, is wearing the attire of those bad-guys does it? Or is the enemy shown just as amorphous gray blobs?
    If this particular game doesn't have Nazis in, then fair enough, please ignore THIS post. I'll post it again when there is a recognisable enemy! But when CoD had WWII as the theme, did the enemy not have any markings showing which side they were on?

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
    1. Re:Context is kinda why I can see it would be used by MareLooke · · Score: 1

      It's the difference between placing a party in it's historical context (with attached imagery) vs associating oneself with said imagery and attached context.

      If someone uses a british flag as his profile image the vast majority of the people will assume he (or she) is British, if someone uses the WWF logo the vast majority will assume they are, if not a member, at least concerned with ecology. If someone uses a swastika...

    2. Re:Context is kinda why I can see it would be used by pookemon · · Score: 1

      Aside from within Zombies the game does not have Nazi's in it (it's based around the Bay of pigs/Viet nam). The symbol is not on the players, it's something they can include in their Tags (Though you might be able to etch it on your weapons - haven't tried). The symbol has no context with respect to this game beyond some people thinking that Nazi symbolism is "cool".

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    3. Re:Context is kinda why I can see it would be used by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks for the clarification.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
  13. This is nothing new by neokushan · · Score: 1

    This is really nothing new, most places that have any kind of moderation will instantly assume that anything that looks even remotely like a swastica is bad or intended to cause offense.
    A few years ago, I had made a map for C&C: Red Alert 2. Part of the map design, by coincidence, had an area that looked a tad like a swastica on the minimap (it was basically an "X" shape with a few lines coming off of it) in one small corner. I'd had a screenshot of it on photobucket and that was removed because it was potentially offensive.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:This is nothing new by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      This building also has a bad rep.

  14. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The way people talk about the Swastika in the Nazi context you'd swear it was an actual weapon that they stabbed people to death with. FCOL! It was the idiots carrying the flags with the Swastika on it that did all the killing, not the symbol itself.

    To use your logic, attributing deaths to symbols and inanimate objects, you should never ever pick up a knife again or even keep one in your house. How many millions of people have been killed by knives since they were first created?

  15. My network, my rules. by Tei · · Score: 1

    Wellcome to the Wallet Garden, ... or maybe you was born there, so you don't know what you miss.

    Freedom is something you learn.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  16. It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by penguinchris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought the game when it came out because I'm unemployed, living in my mother's basement, have nothing else to do, and haven't bought a game in a year or so (besides Civ 5 but that's different).

    I love the fact that you can customize your logo. Other than unlocking better weapons, it would be difficult for me to care less about customizing the appearance of the weapons (which you can do) or your character model (which you can do to a limited extent). But somehow, designing your own little logo really appeals to me.

    I'm obviously not the only one who feels that way, because there are a lot of really intricately designed logos that people have made. I am always sure to look at everyone's logo when we're sitting in the lobby between rounds to look for interesting ones. You see them each time you kill someone or they kill you, too, so you can keep track of players you're playing with by their logo. Of course, there are a lot of typical design styles that you might expect, like skulls and penises and what not. Even with those, though, it's often amazing the creativity that went into them (using the set of graphics available, it's amazing the different ways people have come up with to illustrate ejaculating penises).

    However, for the first several days, there was almost always at least one person with a swastika. Not a hindu or buddhist one - a red, white, and black, rotated 45 degrees, unmistakeably Nazi one. I was in one lobby where no less than three people had them. It's kind of funny actually because, since there's no pre-set swastika symbol, they had to be just as creative when designing their swastika as other people are designing other things.

    Now personally, I believe fully in the freedom of expression, and all that. I am not offended by swastikas, even Nazi ones, by themselves. It depends entirely on the context. Here, it's mostly teenage boys donning them. They're ignorant of history and what the Nazi swastika represents, and the crap that spews out of their mouths if they have a microphone only confirms their ignorance. It really does become offensive. And, I don't need my parents (or anyone else) seeing me interacting with a bunch of idiots with swastika logos - the type of person you'd avoid at all costs in any other context, but who are difficult to avoid on xbox live (or playstation online in my case).

    I believe they must be doing something about it on the PS3 too, because for the past few days I can't recall seeing any swastikas, and I've been playing quite a bit. From a purely business standpoint, it definitely makes sense to ban things like swastikas. To their credit, that's probably the only thing they're going to care about. There certainly hasn't been a decline in the number of ejaculating penis logos.

    1. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>Here, it's mostly teenage boys donning them. They're ignorant of history and what the Nazi swastika represents

      Pfft. Nazis and their swastikas are pretty much the most recognizable figures out of history to the modern teenager.

      If for no other reason than that all the early Call of Duty games featured Nazis.

      While I understand banning the swastikas, it seems rather fucking hypocritical from a series that has made billions of dollars off WWII.

    2. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      And, I don't need my parents (or anyone else) seeing me interacting with a bunch of idiots with swastika logos ...
      To their credit, that's probably the only thing they're going to care about. There certainly hasn't been a decline in the number of ejaculating penis logos.

      But you're good with your parents seeing you interacting with a bunch of cum-spewing dicks?
      I guess you gotta draw the line somewhere...

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by penguinchris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, you're right. But it's entirely a context thing. If I'm playing a WW2 game, I expect to see a lot of swastikas. I expect to see them on my character if I'm playing as the Germans, which you can do in any WW2 game with multiplayer.

      However, here it has nothing to do with the context of the game. It's being used to be provocative - and you would only do this using a swastika if you're a neo-nazi (which probably some of these people are), or if you're ignorant as I suggested. Every teenage boy recognizes the Nazis, yes, but it's ridiculous to suggest that they all *truly* understand the implications of donning the swastika - primarily, they don't understand that it makes them look like an idiot, and it doesn't make them look cool. Especially once you've played this game online with them and you've heard what they have to say - they're ignorant.

    4. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by Hoolang · · Score: 1
    5. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Hehe, that's a good point, but the Nazi swastika is certainly a lot more eye-catching.

    6. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that I *truly* understand the implications of donning the swastika because I didn't have ancestors that were slaughtered. Neither do I *truly* understand how someone feels when they hear the n-word because my ancestors weren't property. However, I know that it's cruel and violent to remind someone of it.

      They aren't ignorant. They enjoy pissing people off and could give two shits that it hurts someone.

    7. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enemy Territory did not have any swasitkas in it, unless you added a third party texture pack.

    8. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      The Third Reich had pretty much the most badass military in history. Using its symbols in a military game might be too obvious, but it is not necessarily done with the worst intentions worthy of a ban. The media companies have certainly shamelessly milked the Nazis for entertainment purposes.

    9. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Ironically, isn't an ejaculating penis also a symbol used by a lot of Buddhists (for fertility)?

      (My source for this is long way round with Ewan McGregor.)

      (Is that the correct use of ironically? I can never tell. Is that ironic?)

    10. Re:It was unbelievably rampant in COD Black Ops by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Here, it's mostly teenage boys donning them. They're ignorant of history and what the Nazi swastika represents, and the crap that spews out of their mouths if they have a microphone only confirms their ignorance. It really does become offensive.

      The problem is that this is not always true. If anything what we know about racism is that is learned. And the young are especially impressionable and I'm sorry but there are plenty of older racist parents around these days even if there has been some sort of collective North American acknowledgment that racism is bad. But saying something is bad just does not make it go away. If anything it causes those who believe in it to dig in and fight harder.

      What tends to happen is something like this. The parents, and often times the community, has racist leanings. The scale may very but there is at the very least an undercurrent of racism that blames all that is wrong on 'those people'. So the kids start to look around to see what this ideology is about. And it's not too long before they find what happened during WW II and thus it begins.

      Racism is nasty, insidious, and pervasive. As I said even the community can spread it even if the parent's are not actively making sure to counter what might be happening in their community. And sadly there are still plenty of places here in the US that have plenty of circles that racist.

      Racism is not anywhere near dead. If anything it's pissed and looking to fight back. I don't agree with censorship at all, but because the long slog in trying to move culture away from it is far from a science I'm willing to accept some bits of censorship for now.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  17. Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I'm all for freedom of speech and expression, but why can't people accept "No, you can't. Some people may find it deeply offensive." as an answer? I think we can all agree that it is reasonable to not want people running around on XBL with swastikas plastered everywhere.

    Yes, the symbol in question has many other meanings, but in an online community where users dedicate no small percentage of their time to finding new ways to spell fa**ot and ni**er to get around content filters, you can bet your ass they probably don't care about any context the symbol had prior to WWII.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
    1. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe anyone has a right not to be offended.

    2. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      But people do not have a right to offend others, either, if I create an online game and state in my terms of service "we reserve the right to ban you for offending other players". And that's what's being discussed here.

    3. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Ziekheid · · Score: 1

      You should never keep your mouth shut just because someone might find what you're saying offensive. But now I'm talking about real life, a blog/forum post, etc. You can add context then and that's exactly the point of this guy, eventhough I don't like the cocky way he presents his opinion.
      I do have a major problem with developers having to censor out swastikas in games that are supposed to be in the time of WW2 though. Eventhough games are usually not 100% historically correct I feel like you're censoring history when you replace/delete swastikas from these games.

      Hell, the Germans are going way overboard when it comes to this. I pasted a video involving a hitler parody (hitler vs darth vader rap battle) to a guy I know in Germany and the video was blocked in his country. I'm not talking about copyrighted content here, just some youtubers who made that video.
      I later discovered it was banned in France too though..

    4. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An innate right? No, they don't. However, if you are in my house, or on my server, I get to make the rules and decide how far my guests are allowed to go when offending one another.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    5. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      Cause the next thing is "no you can't use that pair of boobs as logo"
      Then it is "no you can't use this skull as logo"
      Then it is "no you can't use something resembling a competing brand name as logo"
      Then it is "no you can't use the apple fruit as logo"

      Computers make this kind of stuff extremely easy.

      So complaining at the first stage makes sense.

    6. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I'm all for freedom of speech and expression, but why can't people accept "No, you can't. Some people may find it deeply offensive."

      Because it's a shitty answer. You haven't read "Fahrenheit 451", have you?

    7. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think we can all agree that it is reasonable to not want people running around on XBL with swastikas plastered everywhere."

      i am deeply offended by this opinion. please ban yourself.

    8. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      He probably *did* reply politely the first 40,000 times it was asked. People lose patience over time, you know.

      If I had to deal with constant "debates" from moronic 15-year-olds questioning my decisions, I'd probably be brusque too.

    9. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      You should never keep your mouth shut just because someone might find what you're saying offensive.

      What? Never heard of civil discourse, or just plain 'good manners'?

      What kind of an antisocial fuckhead are you?

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    10. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because ti's an insulting answer, and it only helps empower people who do wear the symbol.

      Also, it's contrary to the most fundamental aspects of freedom. Why is that so hard to understand? If ti gets used wildly, it gets diluted and then becomes a symbol now one cares about. Instead we give it this weird specialty status which perpetuates the initial reaction and empowers assholes.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If I had to make constant decisions for 15 year olds I'd try and be:
      - consistent
      - honest
      - polite

      He's just being a twat.

    12. Re:Why do people have to be jerks on the internet? by Ziekheid · · Score: 1

      I like your irony.

  18. javascript by forwardhairbrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the hell? I really can't scroll down on your site without javascript enabled?

    I'm sure your content was compelling though.

    1. Re:javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed that and just loaded the site in elinks instead; it loaded the content fine. (FYI for anyone that wants to read it without allowing javascript)

      It wasn't worth the effort, though. It's basically just a guy being a dick while arguing a point on his blog. I could have found that somewhere else on the internet without needing to work around shitty site design.

    2. Re:javascript by c · · Score: 1

      > I really can't scroll down on your site without javascript enabled?

      View|Page Style|No Style

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re:javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how someone can fuck-up the basic functions of HTML, like the T (or even the H), when they use Javascript.

  19. Can't help but wonder by dvdx · · Score: 1

    Can't help but wonder if they'd let one use the communist `hammer and sickle' logo in game. Commies committed more genocides than the german fascists [[citation not needed]]. They also lasted much longer.

    If they'd let, it's hypocrisy -- and no excuse about different possible interpretations is available. If not, it would be a very uncommon case... you can see people walking around with such logos on T-shirts every other day. You can easily buy gadgets with the commies logo and nobody seems to mind :(

    1. Re:Can't help but wonder by MareLooke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The USSR (whose flag you are referring to, lumping them all together as "commies" under that flag might offend a couple of other nations) was especially good at getting it's own inhabitants killed and in doing so didn't differentiate between various ethnic groups, for actual genocides I'd say a citation IS needed.

      The Nazis specifically prosecuted and eliminated Jews, gays, lesbians, Roma, handicapped people and probably a slew of other groups that didn't fit into their world view, quite a difference if you ask me.

    2. Re:Can't help but wonder by Rockoon · · Score: 0, Troll

      The Nazis specifically prosecuted and eliminated Jews, gays, lesbians, Roma, handicapped people and probably a slew of other groups that didn't fit into their world view, quite a difference if you ask me.

      You don't seem to know what the word specific means. That also explains the other errors.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Can't help but wonder by Servaas · · Score: 1

      Yet you don't inform nor give examples of the errors.

    4. Re:Can't help but wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said they evenly persecuted them all, yet you provide only links to persecution of jews. How come?

      It's easy to selectively quote Wikipedia!
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin
      "the purges were indiscriminate"

    5. Re:Can't help but wonder by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      The Nazis specifically prosecuted and eliminated Jews, gays, lesbians, Roma, handicapped people and probably a slew of other groups that didn't fit into their world view, quite a difference if you ask me.

      By the way, the Nazis started with german communists first: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/dachau.html

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    6. Re:Can't help but wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because selectively killing people is much more terrible than killing massive amounts of just anyone...

    7. Re:Can't help but wonder by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

      By the way in my country (Hungary) the sickle-hammer symbol is banned, just like the swastika. (Unless it's for representing ww2 history for educational purposes.)

      Russians had 20 million casulties in ww2 which is suspiciously high. (Germany had 1 million.)

      The university where I'm learning had an EE prof that was executed following a show trial, because he was a board member in an electrical power company. You didn't even had to agitate against socialism/communism to get killed, just a few people envying you.

    8. Re:Can't help but wonder by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Would you like any more or can I stop there?

      Your first two links have absolutely nothing to do with commies or the Soviet Union. They are about Russian Empire.

      None of the rest show anything even close to genocide. Were Jews persecuted in the USSR in some historical periods? Yes, same as in many other nations around the globe at different times. It was not, however, something inherent to communist ideology - in fact, many of the original participants of 1917 October Revolution were Jewish, and Jews held a lot of important positions in early Soviet state (a fact often picked by monarchist, Nazi and other non-liberal anti-communist conspiracy theorists in Russia). So, inasmuch as hammer and sickle represents the communist ideology, it doesn't represent genocide in the way Nazi swastika does.

    9. Re:Can't help but wonder by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Russians had 20 million casulties in ww2 which is suspiciously high. (Germany had 1 million.)

      To begin with, it wasn't "Russians", it was "Soviets". Just to remind, at the time of the dissolution of the USSR, only 50% of its population was ethnically Russian. I'm not sure what the figures were like before WW2 - likely the proportion of Russians was higher - but it still helps to be precise.

      Moving from there, the actual official figure of Soviet casualties is 22 million, but that includes both military and civilian casualties - specifically, 10 million military deaths, and 12 million civilian deaths. Note also that this includes people who e.g. died from starvation due to famines caused by war. Aside from those, the count for civilians is so high due to the heavy use of scorched earth tactics by Germans, especially to counter guerrilla warfare in Ukraine and Belarus. Then it also includes 1 million Soviet Jews who perished in concentration camps, or killed on the spot by einzatsgruppen (which were especially active on Soviet territory).

      The military figure of 10 million also includes 3 million POWs who died in German camps due to brutal treatment they were subjected to (generally on par with other "undesirables" such as gays, and very much unlike prisoners from other Allied countries).

      Finally, Germany didn't lost 1 million. They had 5.5 military deaths alone. The figure for civilian casualties depends on whether you include immediate post-war deaths or not, but for the war years it's 1 million, out of which around 300k were killed by Nazis themselves (Jews etc).

  20. One of those questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one of those questions that really should never come up...

    Why? Nobody should be afraid to ask a question.

    The only thing we have to fear from history, especially one so dark and foreboding as the goings-on of WWII Nazis, is being unfortunate enough to repeat it. It should be openly discussed. It should be remembered. And it should never, ever be repeated.

    1. Re:One of those questions... by pookemon · · Score: 1

      "Can I do something that will offend an entire country, entire religion, entire race of people?"

      Why the hell would that kind of question ever need to be asked? People that feel the need to ask such questions should be taken out and summarily shot - or maybe they should be taken to watch their family gassed - under their beloved symbol. Then perhaps they'd understand why it's such a stupid fkn question.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    2. Re:One of those questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, wise ol' Mister "Pookemon".

  21. One of those questions that should never come up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't agree with this.

  22. Isn't it interesting by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't it interesting that Slashdot edits out svastik characters. There is a line of them below

    1. Re:Isn't it interesting by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it's sad that slashdot edits out almost all non-roman characters. You cannot even type cyrillic, greek, chinese etc. I guess they do this to try to keep people from spamming in different languages, but it can be annoying.

    2. Re:Isn't it interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess they do this to try to keep people from spamming in different languages, but it can be annoying.

      It is.

      The reason, BTW, is that when Slashdot allowed all Unicode characters, trolls started using RtL markers to mess with the site's layout, so the admins

      a) created a whitelist of allowed characters to prevent not just current but also future control characters from hitting the site (good)
      b) made it so that pretty much no characters other than the Latin1 ones were on that list (bad)
      c) never updated the list again (worse).

    3. Re:Isn't it interesting by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Isn't it interesting that Slashdot edits out svastik characters. There is a line of them below

      There's a line of Greek letters below:

      How interesting that Slashdot "edits them out". Or maybe their layout engine is just lame and only can handle ASCII.

    4. Re:Isn't it interesting by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is due to people abusing the backword type available in certain languages(cyrillic? I believe) somewhere out there is a demonstration of this little trick

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    5. Re:Isn't it interesting by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is due to people abusing the backword type available in certain languages(cyrillic? I believe)

      Reversing text direction has nothing to do with Cyrillic, or, really, any other language or writing system in particular. It's just a special Unicode symbol.

  23. meh, same all over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be the same as most customer service centers for forums/mmos and the like fiat gm rules, stated policies, and operations directives. Cmdrtaco looses his WoW character name, let people still have that name, someone gets banned for saying "/1 thats gay", and yet while bacteria cultures engage in the "/2 anal [spell]" Its gotta be tough business on the ops end of this.

  24. Symbol Banned in Germany by EponymousCustard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    None of the articles seem to mention that the swastika is banned in Germany. As a result, model aircraft manufacturers (Airfix, Revell, etc) don't include swastikas in their decal sheet so they can sell to the international market.

    1. Re:Symbol Banned in Germany by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      None of the articles seem to mention that the swastika is banned in Germany. As a result, model aircraft manufacturers (Airfix, Revell, etc) don't include swastikas in their decal sheet so they can sell to the international market.

      Exactly, that's another thing which has to be considered here. The xbox live service is available in Germany, too - and so the company could (potentially) get into trouble. Most likely not (the game has already been rated etc. after all), but I am sure it's one of the reasons why game companies make sure those symbols are not used by players.

    2. Re:Symbol Banned in Germany by sharkbiter · · Score: 1

      http://www.warbirdphotographs.com/ATC/german_cross.gif

      Should they ban the plus sign then?

  25. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by MareLooke · · Score: 1

    Except that the knife doesn't stand for a certain belief while the swastika did and is still generally associated with that belief.

  26. Toulouse & Team are being prudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...about what Nintendo has been ambivalent for decades now.

    http://faqsmedia.ign.com/faqs/image/engel_zelda03.gif

    1. Re:Toulouse & Team are being prudes by pookemon · · Score: 1

      Hmm - which side were the Japanese on again? (lol @ the map btw)

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    2. Re:Toulouse & Team are being prudes by Bobakitoo · · Score: 0

      Which side were the Americain on again?
      lol at Wolf3d.
      Was this a secret message aproving the Nazi? I am confuse now.


      You may argue that in the Americain game(wolf3d), the player was killing the bad guys(the nazi). But in the Zelda image, it is a map of some bad guy's dungeon well. So i am not sure of what you are lol at...

  27. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You're gonna have to show me some math.

    2 + 2 = 4

  28. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by NotInfinitumLabs · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The British Raj famines alone killed more than the nazi holocaust (20-29 million). I'm not looking up the rest, if you're this ignorant of history, you need to do some serious reading.

  29. Well someone had to post it by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is the famous picture of Jackie Bouvier (later Jackie Kennedy/Onassis) wearing a Native American costume as a child, complete with swastika. The Swastika is a sacred symbol to many cultures.

    1. Re:Well someone had to post it by Haedrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is why I should totally use it while I'm running around calling people "Noobs" and blowing their heads off with automatic weapons, then teabagging them.

      If in some other game, you're roleplaying a buddhist monk who has it around his neck as a good-luck symbol, its all good and dandy.

      Context people, Context.

  30. You know your game is about killing people, right? by mozumder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like, you made a whole video game to accurately recreate the violent deaths of people for sport, right?

    And you have problems with people expressing their preference for a group that violently killed lots of people?

    MORAL DILEMMA!

  31. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, if the Nazis had chilled out a bit, stopped the whole "let's conquer Europe" thing and the other bit about genocide and racism, established a modern liberal democracy, made friends with their neighbors, but kept the whole swastika business, I don't think anyone would have a problem with it.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  32. necessary but probably futile by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Clearly Microsoft / Treyarch / Activision are free to set their own terms and conditions on the service, which might include banning logos which are obscene, offensive etc. So if you do a swastika and they say its banned then you're best to take them at their word. I don't own COD: Black Ops so I don't know how you customize your logo. But assuming you can draw pretty much anything you like, you only have to look at various ways neo nazis get around this ban to think this is all a futile effort. They substitute the swastika for something with a similar radial symmetry and colour scheme. I can imagine the hilarity that will ensue when someone uses the Isle of Man logo and gets banned for their troubles.

  33. Incorrect - the logos are player-generated by penguinchris · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, the players themselves have the power to create logos. There's a fairly extensive set of graphics (clip art essentially) which you can arrange in any way imaginable - choose the colors, size, arrangement, etc. - to create your logo. Lots of people find creative ways to make penises, and lots of people were finding creative ways to make Nazi swastikas. I made a much longer post about it here already, but you've been modded up, and you're misinformed.

    1. Re:Incorrect - the logos are player-generated by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      GP may be talking about the nazi faction in COD:BlackOps, where you regularly see a swastika appear (at least in multiplayer, and not just a swastika, but red-white-black Nazi flag) every time they use a killstreak reward.

    2. Re:Incorrect - the logos are player-generated by exomondo · · Score: 1

      GP may be talking about the nazi faction in COD:BlackOps, where you regularly see a swastika appear (at least in multiplayer, and not just a swastika, but red-white-black Nazi flag) every time they use a killstreak reward.

      That case - context - is explained in TFA.

  34. We're talking about xbox live here... by IronSight · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...not someone's personal religious blogspot page. If you haven't been on xbox live, let me fill you in. It is not filled with nice people that have a fun game, then talk about their cultural differences in a calm manner over tea. When you turn on your headset, you hear screaming 9 year olds telling their mothers to fuck off when asked to do homework, then tell you how they are going to teabag your corpse. Then they blast gangster rap in your ears over the mic and make it so your team can't talk to each other. You hear people shouting over the microphone's at each other screaming racial slurs every 2 seconds. In my experiance with xbox live, I saw more racism and hate than anywhere else in my life. So if I saw a clan with a swastika as their logo, *yes* I would automatically assume it was the racist/nazi version. And I would also wonder why in the hell I ever went *back* to xbox live in the first place compared to my relatively tame gaming experiance on pc.

  35. Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by michelcolman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'No educated person on the planet looks at the swastika symbol (...) and says "oh, that symbol has nothing at all in any way to do with global genocide of an entire race"'.

    Well, no educated person except a couple of billion buddhists and hinduists. But I suppose they're not educated, since they don't believe in our God.

    When you get a city map in Japan, it's often littered with swastikas for all the buddhist temples. I'm pretty sure those have nothing at all in any way to do with global genocide of an entire race.

    He could have made his point with a little more respect. I can understand you don't want swastikas on an online video game service that's used by a lot of people from western societies, but he's pushing it a little bit too far when he's talking about contrarians arguing about some innate facts.

    1. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you really think that Buddhists and hindus aren't aware that a variant of that symbol was used as the symbol for the Nazi party, and that the Nazis were responsible for attempted genocide?

    2. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by michelcolman · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're probably aware of it, but that does not keep them from continuing to use it like they did before, without even remotely thinking about nazis.

      Are you aware that the Clu Clux Clan uses the Christian cross as a symbol? As an educated person, I suppose you must be. But do you think about the Clan every time you see a church?

      I wonder what would have happened if the article had been about a muslim symbol. There would probably be a couple of embassies on fire by now.

    3. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that Buddhists and hindus aren't aware that a variant of that symbol was used as the symbol for the Nazi party, and that the Nazis were responsible for attempted genocide?

      They are probably aware, just as you are probably aware that Hitler used the Iron Cross as an award. They wouldn't think about it unless it was pointed out or asked though, and would daily see the swastika as a symbol of light.

    4. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      That is because the KKK hasn't co-opted the image of the cross.

      Now, an image of a burning cross is something they have co-opted and is relatively well-understood to be a racist and antagonistic symbol in the U.S.

    5. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The comment was 'No educated person on the planet looks at the swastika symbol (...) and says "oh, that symbol has nothing at all in any way to do with global genocide of an entire race"'.

      The point being that everybody is at least aware that the symbol is associated with the Nazis. It's not that they don't have the right to use it, simply that they can't make the argument that they are not aware of the association. Most will avoid using it out of the context of their religion becuase they are aware that sme people will make this association.

    6. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by icebraining · · Score: 1

      No, I think about hundreds of years of crusades, inquisition and overall imposed intellectual darkness.

    7. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Well, no educated person except a couple of billion buddhists and hinduists. But I suppose they're not educated, since they don't believe in our God.

      But if you're a hindu or buddhist and think of Swastika as a good-luck symbol or whatever, why would you ask if you can use it? You'd simply use it. The very fact that these people asked implies that they are thinking of the Nazi connection. And while it's possible that they are simply polite people who think of Swastika mainly as a religious(?) symbol but are aware of the darker associations so they wanted to make sure, that seems incompatible with arguing about the answer.

      So, the simplest explanation seems to be that these are simply contrarians who love to argue - in other words, trolls.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by BitZtream · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Lets modify his statement for you retards then.

      No educated person on the planet looks at the swastika symbol (...) and doesn't realize how it could be construed'

      Of course you're also ignoring the difference between the Buddhist swastika and the German one, which is ironic considering you're trying to pretend you know so much more than everyone.

      If you're going to pretend you know so much its probably a good idea to know that there are infact to several variations to the symbol by that name.

      Or you could stop faking it, stop Googling to come up with some quick 'fact' to backup your post and stop pretending to be so much better than anyone else since you know about Buddism, you really don't have a clue and it shows.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of us are getting to the point where we just don't care.

    10. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Before you call somebody clueless, it's usually a good idea to do a quick search to make sure you're not the clueless one yourself. Maybe you could read the wikipedia article about "swastika" and learn about how many religions use both left and right handed versions. The page has pictures of religious swastikas that look exactly like the nazi ones. Even the nazis sometimes used both (for example on their ensigns), although they normally prefered the right handed one.

    11. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have anything to do with god.

      The only people using the symbol in this context is using it for bad reasons.

      YOU are being CONTRARY and ignoring the context and common sense.

    12. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by stub667 · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes. Many people here in Thailand *are not* aware. Nazi swastika T-Shirts and helmets are sold on the streets by people who have no concept of the history of that variant.

      WWII around here had little to do with the Nazi's, around here they were busy with the Japanese. Education is terrible so people generally have a poor grasp of local history, let alone what was happening in Europe while their country was occupied by the Japanese and hundreds of thousands died by being worked to death. And why go all the way to Europe for the horror show when Cambodia next door played host to the Khmer Rouge.

    13. Re:Buddhists and hinduists aren't educated (?) by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Okay, but the statement was about educated people being aware. So there's a qualifier as well as the requirement being only that they should be aware. If education is so terrible can we really say they're educated?

  36. Xbox live = prudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://faqsmedia.ign.com/faqs/image/engel_zelda03.gif

  37. I fully agree with that guy by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

    I 100% agree with everything that guy posted in his blog.

    Yes, the swastika symbol does not always stand for nazi Germany, but in our western culture, pretty much EVERYBODY will think of that meaning first - especially if the symbol is drawn in exactly the way used back then (same orientation, same colours). All the "but it has a different meaning in certain religions" arguments are just crap. If you'd ask those people to explain in more detail what they know about the symbol, why it is designed that way and why exactly their 20 people clan so badly wants that symbol as their logo, they would not be able to explain it (or you'd just get a copy of the wikipedia article) - because in reality they actually want the swastika symbol BECAUSE they want to offend people and all the "oh it's a good luck symbol in certain religions" arguments are just bullshit to try and get around the terms of service. Using a swastika as a clan logo in a first person shooter game because it means "luck"? Come on.

    So we're back at "is it ok to intentionally do something which offends people in an online game?", and the answer to that is obvious - it depends on the terms of service of that online game, the game company CAN state that they will ban you for it (free speech does not apply there, same as it does not apply on a private message board).

    1. Re:I fully agree with that guy by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you'd ask those people to explain in more detail what they know about the symbol, why it is designed that way and why exactly their 20 people clan so badly wants that symbol as their logo, they would not be able to explain it (or you'd just get a copy of the wikipedia article) - because in reality they actually want the swastika symbol BECAUSE they want to offend people and all tht online game, the game company CAN state that they will ban you for it (free speech does not apply there, same as it does not apply on a private message board).

      Absolute fucking cobblers. In nearly every city in Britain and probably America you will find a Mandir and every one will have swastikas. There have been 3,000 people at ours at Deepawali and other similar occasions (not your group of 20), and nobody is shocked, or wants to shock people. Your assertion that a handfull of people want to use the swastika to shock people is absolute crap, a large number of people use it regularly as a religious symbol.

    2. Re:I fully agree with that guy by Golden_Rider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolute fucking cobblers. In nearly every city in Britain and probably America you will find a Mandir and every one will have swastikas. There have been 3,000 people at ours at Deepawali and other similar occasions (not your group of 20), and nobody is shocked, or wants to shock people. Your assertion that a handfull of people want to use the swastika to shock people is absolute crap, a large number of people use it regularly as a religious symbol.

      That may be, but we are talking about an ONLINE SHOOTER here. The only reason anybody would want to use a swastika in a xbox live shooter (with mostly male teenage players) is not religion, it's the link to nazi Germany.

    3. Re:I fully agree with that guy by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      We're playing nazi vs usa games since computer games exists, but the nazi ones can't wear the logo. Makes no sense to me to be honest.

      I'm pretty sure it actually shocks some people that you can usually play the nazi side. Actually, it's called Axis instead, much more politically correct.

      Yes sure the ones wearing it want to be "the axis side" - it doesn't mean they are nazi, it's a war game where you KILL people after all.
      If the axis had won the war, we'd probably be arguing about not being able to use the american, french, and whatever else flag because "it's bad" anyways.

    4. Re:I fully agree with that guy by Kijori · · Score: 1

      And I fully agree with you fully agreeing with that guy.

      I think a lot of people on Slashdot are doing exactly what he complained about - look round on the internet to find some way they can disagree and then disagreeing, just for the sake of being contrarian. These people don't seem to have noticed the difference between the examples they're giving and the use that's being banned: context, the title of the guy's post and pretty much the entire reason for his decision. In some contexts a swastika can be a neutral or even positive symbol. Devoid of any context, as a player's logo, normally decked out in the colours of the Nazis, is another matter. It's being used by ignorant players to be deliberately offensive and provocative, and the arguments are just rationalisations.

      I would urge anyone thinking of posting to say "in some places the swastika is fine" to read the article first. He addresses that point, and he probably actually agrees with you. So far I haven't seen a single pro-Swastika post that wasn't clearly either written by someone who hadn't bothered to read what the guy said before disagreeing with it or by someone who had just gone to Wikipedia to look for a reason to be contrary. Neither of those is particularly helpful.

    5. Re:I fully agree with that guy by delinear · · Score: 1

      And yet when people are playing a war game outside the context of WWII (as is the case with CoD:BO) and still want to use the symbol, what other logical conclusion can you draw than that they are trying to be purposely inflammatory? Most people wouldn't take offence at someone wearing a Nazi uniform at a historic re-enactment, but someone wearing a swastika when they're having a drink in the local pub where they know people will be offended has determined to send out a message.

    6. Re:I fully agree with that guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the swastika TFA is referring to is the black on white on red, arms waving right, 45 degree tilted, honest to goodness nazi swastika. That's what is being put in the game's emblem area. That's what this whole fucking discussion is about.

      If I went to a Buddhist temple and saw an eastern-meaning swastika on the walls I would not be shocked. If I went to a Buddhist temple and saw a black on white on red, arms waving right, 45 degree tilted, honest to goodness nazi swastika, I'd be pretty fucking shocked.

  38. DIggin through the old bunkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I really wish they'd find some evidence that Hitler liked Justin Bieber. Poof, another problem becomes socially awkward to admit liking.

    1. Re:DIggin through the old bunkers by Chrisq · · Score: 1
      let me correct your punctuation.

      I really wish they'd find some evidence that Hitler liked Justin Bieber (Poof). Another problem becomes socially awkward to admit liking.

    2. Re:DIggin through the old bunkers by Bobakitoo · · Score: 0

      It is already socially awkward to admit liking him since he was found to be a 51 year old pedophile.

  39. sounds familiar by underqualified · · Score: 1
    You know the type I mean. They’ve read an article that’s contrarian to some position widely held, or they’ve found some obscure fact that contradicts common interpretation. Some of them claim to have known it as innate fact, others claim it to be widespread common knowledge taught to every single person in elementary school. Of course, usually neither is true at all. Most of them are just contrarians. They would never dare to wear a swastika openly, but they love to argue about how the world has “misunderstood” this symbol. Or they view any opportunity for human interaction, no matter the appropriateness, to push their point. You know, like you do.

    yup, that definitely sounds like someone from /.

  40. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by somersault · · Score: 1

    war wise, i can't think of many major wars against black people

    Ahem.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  41. Hey by hannas · · Score: 1

    Didn't we soundly defeat those who used that symbol about 65 years ago? What us the problem of using it now?

    1. Re:Hey by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      Because the victors do not wish to glorify the losers.

      And because of the fact that they were responsable for millions of deaths - including quite a few innocent ones.

      You don't want people glorifying the largest attempt ever at genocide.

  42. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by somersault · · Score: 1

    Except that the knife doesn't stand for a certain belief while the swastika did and is still generally associated with that belief.

    Are you referring to Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism? That seems more like "beliefs" than "belief" to me.

    The swastika shape itself has been around for at least 8000 years according to that wiki entry. The swastika itself is still "generally associated" by millions or billions of people with their own religion.

    Oh, and some idiot racist group used it for 20 years or so.

    If some nation used the Christian cross as their symbol and committed a whole load of atrocities, do you think Christians would stop using the cross as a symbol? Somehow I doubt it. Crosses and cross like shapes make for very powerful and striking symbols. That's why Hitler used the Swastika in the first place.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  43. swastika is a no then.... by jaggeh · · Score: 1

    what about the single decal item which is the SS skull. you dont have to pull off any artistic acrobatics to make it, its just there.

    --
    I would give everything i own for a little bit more.
  44. Kill people but be nice about it by jadrian · · Score: 1

    It's kind of funny that there's a discussion about certain symbols being evil, in a game where you're running around shooting people's heads.

    1. Re:Kill people but be nice about it by delinear · · Score: 1

      Not really. The key word was "game".

  45. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Bobakitoo · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Crusades were far worse.
    There is no comparison. Ban the christian cross!

    In fact, let ban all cross type symbols. Most were use, in the past, by despicable peoples. And all the remaining will be use by others despicable peoples in the future. We might as well ban them all right now.

  46. HYPOCRISY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Nazis killed about 21 million people. Stalinism killed more than the double. So did Maoism, even when not counting the 38 million dead from the Great Famine, a direct consequence of Mao's "Great Leap Forward".

    You can verify these numbers by reading R.J.Rummel's "Death by Government".

    Furthermore, there is no country that benefited from Communism whatsoever: It brought massacres and untold misery to millions, it killed 1/3 of Cambodia's population and kept half of Europe in poverty for over half-of-a-century.

    Turns out the communist symbol seems as much offensive to me (and probably millions of others) than the Swastika. I have no affinity whatsoever with Nazis, but I find the double-standard quite astounding.

    Just because an ideology professes good overall intentions ("workers of the world unite", etc..) doesn't make it any better, not does it mean that the millions of its victims can be simply brushed away as mere mistakes. If there must be censorship , why aren't these people subject to the same censorship than the Swastika fans?

    1. Re:HYPOCRISY by craftycoder · · Score: 1

      I doubt their problem is hypocrisy. I suspect it is more likely that very few people actually complain about communist symbology. That is not to say that many people complain about nazi symbology either. I doubt there are many complaints at all. They are more likely just following the basic corporate playbook. The one that says, "You need to be politically correct, and not moral or righteous."

      Remember, these people are in the business of selling death to children. They clearly don't have the moral high ground. They just don't want anything to distract them from their main goal or making money (even if they have to push death and gore to my son to do it).

    2. Re:HYPOCRISY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Selling death to children"?

      You know that the texture mapped image represented on the screen never was alive, so you cannot kill it.

      TRON, on the other hand, is real.

    3. Re:HYPOCRISY by delinear · · Score: 1

      Not to mention (in the UK at least) the game has a certification age of 18. If anyone is selling digitised death to children it's irresponsible retailers or parents.

    4. Re:HYPOCRISY by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Stalinism killed more than the double.

      Only if you count all the famines that were caused by sheer incompetence of the new power. But then you'd also have to count all the famines that happened in capitalist countries as "deaths caused by capitalism". Or maybe we should write up all the plague victims in Middle Age Europe as victims of Christianity?

      Furthermore, there is no country that benefited from Communism whatsoever

      You go tell that to all the countries occupied by Nazis during WW2. Do I need to remind which flag was over Reichstag, or which country alone is responsible for over 2/3 of all Axis military deaths?

      If you mean to say the countries which practiced Communism did not benefit themselves, then it makes more sense, except where the above still applies. It's all a huge string of what-ifs, but assuming no communist takeover (and subsequent forced rapid industrialization) in Russia, and further assuming that Nazi Germany would still be in place, Russia all the way to Urals would likely be a colony of the Großdeutsches Reich.

      Turns out the communist symbol seems as much offensive to me (and probably millions of others) than the Swastika. I have no affinity whatsoever with Nazis, but I find the double-standard quite astounding.

      The reasoning is fairly simple here. Hammer and sickle is first and foremost a representation of communist ideology. Swastika is first and foremost a representation of Nazi ideology.

      And you know what is the difference between the two? Communist (in traditionalist Marxist-Leninist sense) one definitely calls for killing as part of class warfare; but nowhere it calls for wholesale murder of ethnic, religious or other groups of people. There were genocides in the USSR in practice, but they were driven by pragmatic reasons (i.e. desire to stay in power), not by ideology.

      To give a similar examples, the genocide of Native Americans perpetrated by European colonists in North America was also driven by pragmatic reasons, namely the desire to take over their lands. It was not driven by capitalist or Christian ideology.

      In contrast, Nazi ideology does call for genocide - it's inherent in the thing. Simply put, It is possible to be a communist (and use the symbols accordingly) and believe that mass murders perpetrated by Soviets and others were erroneous; indeed, many communists today and in the past argue just that - e.g. practically all Trotskyists do so with respect to Stalinist repressions. But it's impossible to be a Nazi (and use the symbols accordingly) and believe that Jews are actually nice people, and the whole Holocaust thing (and other racial/ethnic discrimination) was a bit of a mistake.

  47. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    The way people talk about the Swastika in the Nazi context you'd swear it was an actual weapon that they stabbed people to death with. FCOL! It was the idiots carrying the flags with the Swastika on it that did all the killing, not the symbol itself.

    To use your logic, attributing deaths to symbols and inanimate objects, you should never ever pick up a knife again or even keep one in your house. How many millions of people have been killed by knives since they were first created?

    I wish I had mod points. Its pretty hypocritical for people who say "guns don't kill people do" to say "oh gosh that Buddhist has a swastika... thats terrible we all know the swastika is evil".

  48. now I understand by craftycoder · · Score: 0, Troll

    Now I understand why XBOX games are so expensive. They have people on their staff that think about such trivial and inane topics as this. If they just focused on software, I wonder how much their stuff would cost?

  49. No Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So just use an SS symbol instead

    1. Re:No problem by ExtremePhobia · · Score: 1

      You have points here but I think that in this case, it would be considered the best "reasonable response." It's not even like they sought this person out, he came to them and asked about it. They said no.

      They can't protect everybody, but when you are going to choose possibly the biggest symbol with the worst common connotation, they made the right move. I mean when you see it, are you going to see a Hindu symbol? No. Of course not. To put it in perspective, I think in some instances even the devil is less scorned than this symbol. He is, after all, used by a lot more than just the religious crowd. But you're right, I mean really, they should be equal across the board...

  50. US 45th Inf Division would like to speak with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmm... it seems that the 'enlightened, educated folks' that fear the symbol have little enlightenment and less education.

    The US Army's 45th Infantry Division used the 'swastika' as the Divisional emblem for a good 20+ years. It was changed in the 30's as National Socialism rose in Germany.

    Also, 'NAZI' is a political party, not a Military Organization. The Wehrmacht is the German Army.

    How does X-Box Live reconcile the fact that the Russian Communist Party killed many, many more of its own people than the NAZIs did, yet the hammer ad sickle are not banned?

    I am not offended by the Swastika... but I am conscious of the fact that the NAZI party did some horrible things. There is a difference.

  51. Re:You know your game is about killing people, rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This raises a good question:

    Where the hell do you draw the line?

    Should we ban Imperial Japanese flags because they beheaded civilians for sport? Or the Hammer and Sickle because of the labor camps / political purges? the Crusader Cross? the AK-47? the Confederate Flag? the Black Panther Party Logo?

    The game is about killing. If you got a problem with someone's motivations, kill them.

    God forbid they release a graphics editor for NASCAR!

  52. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please enlighten and list which of the Crusades were held under the banner of the Union Flag.

  53. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Never attribute to malice what you could instead attribute to stupidity.

    Captcha: hubris. Appropriate.

  54. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike Americans who hail from the only nation to have ever deployed a nuclear weapon in anger. And there are plenty of US flags on there too, you ignorant fuck.

  55. Let me get this straight. by ewhenn · · Score: 1

    I could have an avatar named 'WaffenPanzer' with SS lightning bolts as a picture and that's totally cool.

    However, I couldn't have an avatar named 'AncientUnity' with a swasika?

    How much fucking sense does that make?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I could have an avatar named 'WaffenPanzer' with SS lightning bolts as a picture and that's totally cool.

      And you tried that? And Xbox Live staff told you it was a-ok?

      Or are you just pulling "facts" out of your ass in some lame attempt to make some lame point about hypocrisy?

      Hey, here's a little pro-tip: this forum isn't full of retards. Tactics like that might work on GameFAQs, but people here have two brain cells to run together.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I could have an avatar named 'WaffenPanzer' with SS lightning bolts as a picture and that's totally cool.

      Probably not. From the linked blog post:

      ... by the way, that doesn't just go for the Swastika, it applies to many other symbols as well that my team does indeed take action on when we see it.

      TL;DR: If you see offensive symbols in Call of Duty, Black Ops, report them using the in game option and they will be taken care of.

      A more interesting question is what happens if someone uses one of those stick figure "Muhammad pictures" for an avatar, and complaints start coming in.

  56. No problem by ledow · · Score: 1

    Great! So XBox Live is now a moderated environment and thus take responsibility for anything Nazi-like that slips through their filters, eh? Because obviously they deem things not to be freely "user-created" but that they are the guardians of taste in their own area. So when I *do* find something offensive (which is becoming more a problem with the person being offended than the other being offensive in modern times), I can blame them for letting it slip through.

    How does this differ from the ISP's that don't want to take responsibility for moderating user content? (I know there are differences, but there are also critical parallels).

    And what if I create a fuss that Nazi-imagery is banned but not {some other random group that caused atrocities}? So Xbox Live have to decide on a moral scale if something is better or worse than the Nazi-imagery and thus issue some kind of official statement to that effect? Or ban anything even slightly controversial (which could be construed to be almost anything with some people)?

    It seems an odd thing to create a fuss about and that's why most places that do this sort of thing do it silently (or hide behind a "we considered *your particular* image inappropriate"). I wonder how many pseudo-swastika's (or "worse") there are running around on Xbox Live at this very moment?

    Things that are illegal to depict in the first place, fair enough - you don't want child porn images running around on Xbox Live avatars - and in some countries depiction of Nazi-imagery is illegal (France and probably Germany too? I know they banned all Nazi-related eBay auctions, even for memorabilia). But is it actually wrong for someone to depict what is effectively a logo on their avatar? I'm sure that "Jeff's Pork Emporium" has a logo that wouldn't fly in certain strictly-against-pork countries, but does that mean Xbox Live would ban any pig-related imagery across the world on their system?

    Nobody wants another Nazi, not even one. However, fear of such things creates silly situations. There are wargames, and have been for 20+ years, where you can actually play the German army and see the swastika and have it emblazoned on your (virtual) arm. Weren't they in the original Wolfenstein, for instance? It's not unreasonable to suggest that someone who plays such a game and likes playing as the German side might want to display a logo on their arm (especially if they see it only as a symbol, e.g. because of their age).

    I think they would have been better off saying "We don't want to promote extremism, and we don't want to spend our lives moderating images as to whether they fit the category, so we're just going to have a blanket ban on swastikas." I'm sure that's what they mean but that's not what the original post portrays. It seems more like a "Some people misuse stuff and you can't be trusted not to misuse it so you can't have anything even close to it" - which kinda sounds like the corporate arguments for DRM more than anything else.

  57. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by robthebloke · · Score: 1

    In WW2 the estimated number of dead was in the region of 50 to 70 million, which compares to about 1.5million during the crusades (from the estimates I've seen, summed over a number of centuries). How do you decide that the crusades were worse exactly?

  58. In Soviet Slashdot . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . the title Godwins you!

    Despite any political or historical implications, I would assume that most folks would realize that using a Swastika would be in bad taste.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  59. BALANCE by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2, Funny

    Half the world is starving - capitalism exports it's misery and pollution to poor countries and robs those countries of there resources. How many people have died of famine - and how often have the people in those countries been living under capitalist goverments? Add those numbers up and then tell me communism is worse. Don't get me wrong, I don't like any dictatorships, but your post smacks of McCarthyism.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  60. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Urkki · · Score: 1

    The Crusades were far worse.

    There is no comparison. Ban the christian cross!

    In fact, let ban all cross type symbols. Most were use, in the past, by despicable peoples. And all the remaining will be use by others despicable peoples in the future. We might as well ban them all right now.

    That's actually an excellent example of what happens when enough time passes. Eventually also the swastika will no longer be any more objectionable (possibly less), than crusaders' or conquistadors' symbols are today.

  61. Forget the swastika ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    After al, if this is XBox Live, use one of THESE:
    1. The WalMart logo
    2. The BSD devil
    3. The Tux Penguin
    4. The Hammer and Sickle
    5. The BSoD flag / GSoD flag
    1. Re:Forget the swastika ... by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah I tagged it "trident" because why not ban that symbol of eternal evil as well?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  62. Heritage! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Heritage not Hate!

    Oh wait, wrong hatespeech. My bad.

  63. Maybe I'm dumb but... by ExtremePhobia · · Score: 1

    So let me get this strait. Someone playing CoD wants to use the Swastika as logo in a WAR GAME. And he wants to be all preachy about it's different meanings when they say no?

    The Swastika had all sorts of positive connotations UNTIL some idiot decided to fly it over their artillery. And you are different how, Mr. "I want to use a positive religious symbol in a war game?" Get with it buddy. Maybe you aren't committing genocide but you're still perverting the symbol.

  64. It's about market perception, not fact. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    If they allow swastikas, Microsoft are Nazis.
    The folks at MS probably think that would make them look bad, damage the brand, hurt sales, etc.
    So they don't allow swastikas.

    What is this so hard for you to understand?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  65. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The British Raj famines alone killed more than the nazi holocaust (20-29 million). I'm not looking up the rest, if you're this ignorant of history, you need to do some serious reading.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine_in_India

    You are correct in your numbers but I personally don't think those two things are directly comprable.

    It is relatively common in India to claim that the famines were the goal of the British all along, though history reveals that this is not true. The British policies (between trade and taxation mostly) made *worse* issues that were already underlying (existing famines, uneven rainfall, rice fungus etc.) in much of the country. The famines were much worse under the British than India had ever had before, and this is because the British trade policies caused entirely new problems that India didn't have before in combination with the already existing issues of variable rainfall and food supplies. The British government did actually attempt to alleviate the issues of famine in numerous ways over the years while still maintaining profitability - and that was really the problem.

    I'm not defending what the British did. It was absolutely and completely wrong. But I think if you read the history of the events in depth you will realise that it is no way comparable to the Nazi holocaust. The Nazi's had a 100% intention of massacring those people. In the famines, people were killed as a combination of ignorance, greed and just-not-caring-enough. To me, that is entirely different to loading people into gas chambers and shooting them in their beds. When judging the ethics of others, I tend to think the intention behind the action is an important issue. The famines showed money was more important to the British Government than human life. The end goal for the British was money - the end goal for the Nazi's was the extermination of entire races. I think the distinction is pretty important here.

    Of course the British did massacre a lot of Indian people in a much more direct fashion at numerous points in history. Again this was absolutely wrong and comprable to the Holocaust - but I am only comparing the famines here as the parent brought it up with a seemingly loaded statement.

    Personally I'm rather glad we lost/ditched the vast majority of the British empire. While all nations in history have been forged in the fires of blood and violence, as a Brit, I am ashamed of some of the horrors the British managed to inflict upon the world while expanding its once massive influence. What's more interesting is that hardly anybody here in the UK even seems to be aware of it. Any thoughts from abroad?

  66. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by DrXym · · Score: 1
    In fact, let ban all cross type symbols. Most were use, in the past, by despicable peoples. And all the remaining will be use by others despicable peoples in the future. We might as well ban them all right now.

    I'd be comfortable with that. Ban all religious symbols on the grounds that they are provocative and inflammatory. It's a game FFS, not a springboard for someone's lunatic religious or ideological beliefs.

  67. Misuse by Deadstar_lll · · Score: 1

    I doubt people in a game where your in a war type setting want to use the swastika for a victory sign. They know that from the history with the Nazi's. If they allow that then they might as well make a flight simulator where you can have a picture of 2 burning buildings on the side....

  68. Proof by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    This thread is proof that racism and anti-intellectualism is alive and kicking.

  69. Lets be real people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure the swastika means different things to different people, but if you see it on CoD then you can pretty much assure it is the nazi swastika and is meant to offend people. Xbox live is one of the most racist filled, foul mouthed, crap talking places on earth. People are constantly yelling the N word, talking about another players mom, or just cussing everyone out in general. So someone running around with a swastika on their gun is more than likely not saying "I hope this brings me the luck to win all my games." but likely means "HAHAHA I ARE A NAZI DIE JOOS!". If you disagree you are either a troll or hae never played XBL in your life.

  70. Libertarian, schmibertarian.... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    You know, until recently I was an ardent free speecher.
    This sort of censorship would set me off on 'slippery slope' discussion and 'intellectual consistency' and all sorts of bs.

    But you know what? There are some reasonable limits on free speech; if you don't like my particular list of what I don't like, then don't play my game or elect me emperor.

    --
    -Styopa
  71. The Cross by dragin33 · · Score: 1

    I don't like when people use the swastika because it symbolizes the group whose goal it was to wipe the Jews from the planet. And that is just pure evil.. I, like many other Americans, identify the symbol of the Cross with the Bible and more specifically with Jesus. Although it represents something both horrible (the process) and wonderful (salvation), many Americans see it in a favorable light. *However* - I must say - there are many in the middle east who would have the symbol banned. Why? I think it is at least partly because the symbol of the cross was brought against them in war during the crusades. This obviously had nothing to do with God (this was an evil act as well) but I think it has left a similar feeling for the cross that we have of the swastika.

  72. Signs change their meaning over time by RichiH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, swastikas have a long history of meaning good luck and prosperity all across the world. Yes, I would have preferred the nazis to use the goatse man instead of the swastika, but unless you are in the most remote regions of the Andes, a swastika means nazis.

    The twin towers had a different meaning before 9/11, Tiananmen Square used to have a different meaning and so did a lot of other symbols/places/buildings.

    And about the trolls who argue otherwise: They don't want to use the swastika cause they are deeply rooted in one of various old cultures or religions. It's because they want to shock people or they actually condone the actions of the nazis.

    Long story short: Fuck them. Optionally with a large swastika. Those are cool, after all.

  73. Confederate Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets just switch it to a confederate battle flag. That would be so much less controversial right? I mean it's not a symbol of slavery but more about state's rights. Insensitive clods.

  74. Re:You know your game is about killing people, rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's US Americans doing the killing! Anyone else is WRONG!!!11!

  75. Niche Interpretation? by linnorm · · Score: 1

    Indeed, my twitter stream was filled with people stating that Xbox LIVE should equally ban the star of David, the Christian cross, and yes I am not kidding, the infinity symbol because under various niche interpretations of those symbols, they are as evil as the swastika symbol and I should apply ethical relativism to all symbols on Xbox LIVE to respect all viewpoints because of the United States First Amendment.

    Since when is the KKK's use of the Christian cross a "niche interpretation"?

    1. Re:Niche Interpretation? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Since no mainstream Christian denomination preaches that lynching black people is OK?

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  76. It's not illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't people ignoring one little thing?

    It's not illegal to be a Nazi nor openly mark it (except in Germany, atleast not in Norway). Though I condone the Nazi acts of WW2, I respect a person right to individual freedom and choice of religion/following.

    People should learn to respect what offends them instead.

    1. Re:It's not illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooops, condemn yes !!!! =D Bad typo/wrong word there hoho =D

  77. context is king, after all by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    Naturally, Slashdot being what is it, most people here will argue that this guy is wrong. They'll also prove his point.

  78. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike Americans who hail from the only nation to have ever deployed a nuclear weapon in anger. And there are plenty of US flags on there too, you ignorant fuck.

    And people still vote democrat after they brought this destruction to the world.

  79. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 0

    Only if you ban the US flag too. They are currently waging a war that costs tens of thousands of lives over oil. If that's not evil I don't know what is. Ban the US Flag!

    And while you're at it, let's ban Australia's flag too! They're nothing but a bunch of criminals, since that's how they got there. They're just a penal colony for the Brits.

    And let's ban the Brit flag too! They killed countless Americans during the revolutionary war. Totally evil.

    Let's not forget to ban the Japanese flag, since they actually HELPED the Nazis, and went so far as to attack the US for no good reason. Clearly evil.

    And I better not see any Cuban or Chinese flags up there, since they are communist dictatorships, which is just downright evil.

    When does the mindless uneducated BS stop? Be a better person: ignore the douche from the article and formulate your own opinions.

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  80. Re:You know your game is about killing people, rig by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Killing people is okay with them. It's the politics that they seek to avoid tangling with. Obscenity is not in the killing, it's in the ideals you represent. That alone should be pretty telling. We have a completely screwed up sense of decency and morality.

    (I still like playing first person shooter games though... not against that in the least! I'm just saying that for people who are supposed to be supporting decency and morality, they seem to be focused on the wrong things most of the time... they care more about how people get pleasure than anything else!)

  81. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by morgen_m · · Score: 1

    Great show of ignorance. Do you know how many millions died in the famines? And because of partition? That's a much bigger number than the people died in the holocaust.

  82. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by somersault · · Score: 1

    I don't think that was his point exactly. Even the current English flag wasn't used around at the time of the crusades, but as a nation we've still done a lot of evil stuff. The point is that it's not the symbol that's important, it's the actions of the people behind the symbol.

    Many computers have come out over the years using the Commodore and Amiga brands, but I haven't bought any since the A1200, because I know it's just a bunch of guys that have bought rights to the symbol. They don't have any of the ingenuity or flair as the original Commodore guys. If it doesn't mean anything for good symbols, why should it mean anything for the bad?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  83. Buddhism by joost · · Score: 1

    The Xbox moderator obviously has never been to Asia nor has he ever shown any interest in Buddhist culture. Which is okay in itself (even if a little closed minded) but he really should refrain from making statements like that. The swastika is used all over Japan for instance where it denotes a temple. It's been used for thousands of years, and it is not associated with the Nazis when shown to someone from there. He holds a typical imperialist view and projects that onto his Xbox community. Which is to be expected, given that it mostly targets Westerners anyway. So all bad? No, but very close-minded. From a moderator you would expect a more mature/moderate approach.

    1. Re:Buddhism by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So, do Buddhists use swastikas as symbols of good luck for their avatars in wargames?

  84. A Simple Solution: by TheABomb · · Score: 1

    Call of Duty: Black Ops is a game where you simulate shooting people. If you don't like people in it using Swastika symbols (BTW, there is a difference between a "symbol" and a "logo", but I digress), just go shoot them (in the game, I stress) and keep it up until they don't want to use it any more.

    Worked for Winston Churchill, anyhow.

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  85. Screenshot by d-ude · · Score: 1

    I was playing one of these guys the other day and grabbed a shot with my BlackBerry to send to a friend. I put it on my Facebook so I could share it with you all. It's obviously a Nazi version...

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=1790730&l=58123b17f4&id=1049148624

  86. Double standard by NuKe_MoNgOoSe · · Score: 1

    I find it amusing that Microsoft has no problems making profit off of nazi symbolism as it applies in a game environment, i mean hell look at Zombies its all about killing undead germans and its chalk full of crap that alludes to Nazi germany.. but a kid wants to rock a Shwastika and the whole world rises up against him. Give me a fuckin break COD:BO is rife with people creating every animal under the sun fucking every other animal with a pickle dick, people creating all sorts of satanic and anti-religious symbolism... wtf did they expect really. Dont get mad at the kid creating the Shwastika get mad at the producers of the game who gave them the ability. Or i dunno, stop being a over sensitive twat if i was to report everything that offended me the list would be really short. My girlfriend on the otherhand is easily offended but even she knows that when she signs onto live she knows the environment she is going into and shes not about to crusade to get someones gamer tag banned.

    --
    When you dislike the human race as much as I do, Karma:Bad is inevitable lol.
  87. Symbols change by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the meaning of symbols change, sometimes radically and over short periods of time. Back in the 70's and 80's I remember when the Confederate battle flag (actually a modification of it) was considered a symbol of rebellion. Rock stars like Billy Idol and Richy Sambora even had guitars painted like rebel flags, and lots of rock bands used them in their stage shows. But in the 90's the flag became symbol non grata as groups like the NAACP started protesting it as a symbol of the pro-slavery Confederacy.

    So symbols aren't like "rape is bad." One day a symbol can mean one thing, the next day something completely different. Two people can see the same symbol and come away with two radically different impressions. Symbols are all about what *WE* put into them.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Symbols change by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the meaning of symbols change

      Are we speaking generally or specifically?

      Generally, yes, the meaning of symbols do change.

      Specifically, I think it's safe to say the meaning of a swastika is pretty much what it's been for the past half-century. Unless you're a hindu who doesn't watch The History Channel.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Symbols change by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 1

      Yes, the meaning of symbols change, but the meaning of this particular symbol for millions of people hasn't yet changed. It probably never will in our lifetimes. That means, for right now, the symbol is offensive to a great many people.

      --
      I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
  88. Sorry, but Hitler poisoned it for everyone by davidwr · · Score: 1

    We'll have to wait until the children of the WWII generation die off before this symbol can be used for any "modern" use.

    Until then it can only be used for things that are specifically related to its pre-1933 uses such or in a Nazi-era use that specifically condemns Nazism, such as most WWII movies that weren't made by the Axis powers.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  89. It should depend on the content by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    If the game takes place during WWII, and the setting involves combat in Europe, then the use of the swastika would be correct. You simply can't take it out of the setting.

    1. Re:It should depend on the content by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If the game takes place during WWII, and the setting involves combat in Europe

      Let me look it up on Wikipedia for you.

  90. Educate but still regulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting; what he calls the "reverse" swastika is actually the variant used in Asia for millennia. The "Nazi" version is really the historically reversed design. But I guess we've come to take that as "normal", or at least well-known, so the original design is now "reversed".

    Reversed or not people look at both as the symbol of genocide & hatred.

  91. Re:You know your game is about killing people, rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're seriously comparing playing a game about fighting with the mass genocide that was carried out in the real world then you have some really messed up sense of proportion. Many people have no problem distinguishing reality from fiction, and a handful of those people find it offensive when people bring symbols of those real world atrocities into what should be a fun game for no other reason than to engender an angry response (we call this "trolling"). It doesn't bother me either way what symbols people use but I do like to play on servers that aren't full of people screaming abuse. If people really do want to use the symbol in its original meaning that's all well and good, but you have to question why they choose to make a stand in such an inflammatory way instead of, for instance, composing a well thought out article for their blog, etc.

  92. What about the other swastikas? by node_chomsky · · Score: 1

    Aren't swastikas already in a lot of games on X-Box Live? Do Nazi characters in WW2 themed games have smiley faces on their arm band. I seem to recall wolfenstein 3d (this is seriously the most modern FPS games I have played) being loaded to the hilt with swastikas.

    1. Re:What about the other swastikas? by NuKe_MoNgOoSe · · Score: 1

      lol it had a CYBERNETIC HITLER complete mith moustache and dual gatling guns! People are just way way to easily offended nowadays its sad really.

      --
      When you dislike the human race as much as I do, Karma:Bad is inevitable lol.
  93. "The map is not the territory" by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

    "The map is not the territory" - Alfred Korzybski

    Kinda like how the combination of characters in "9/11" suddenly has meaning attributed it. Our limited range of symbol usage will always belie the actual meanings and situations. As usual, Wikipedia is informative as a quick overview (link below).

    Wikipedia (English): Swastika

    As for the context of Korzybski's quote, see here: Wikipedia (English): General semantics

  94. The poor Jainists by Torodung · · Score: 1

    I wonder what a Jainist would say about this? Their religious symbol was the swastika long before Hitler co-opted it for his ill-adivised secular Teutonic religion.

    There can be no ultimate sin but the belief that it exists. Nathaniel Hawthorne was right.

    --
    Toro

    1. Re:The poor Jainists by scubamage · · Score: 1

      My impression from most Jains that I've had the pleasure of meeting is that they'd most likely demure, since the minor chance they could incur any sort of emotional stress or pain on another would be enough reason for them to do so. I do think its BS that a cross is ok, while the symbol of another religion is not ok because some idiots used it years ago.

  95. Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds to me like he's got it backwards.

    He refers to working within a narrow context as respectful, but the fact of the matter is that it is HIS context. He is this only person with his particular world view, and it is dubious (at best) to say that his conception of the swastika is the commonly understood one.

    If his argument is about respect, then he should be trying to respect all perspectives that are not his own. It is more disrespectful to deny someone the ability to live and play while expressing their own world view than to allow a symbol that some might find offensive within a particularly limited and narrow context.

    If his policy is to allow things only under what he perceives as the most commonly understood context, he eliminates the overarching context that will make a difference to users as a whole.

    Fox-holing users into narrow world views is more offensive than swastikas, whether they came from Nazis or religion.

  96. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone else pointed out, the death toll over the centuries was lower than that caused by the Nazis by an order of magnitude.

    Even so, banning the cross is like banning the original (non-Nazi) swastika... Why would you want to do that?
    You'd better ask for banning symbols of papal power since the papacy initiated the crusades. Or do you believe the pope to have authority over all Christians?

    Nazism deserves a special abhorrence.

  97. There are a lot of swastikas in this game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised no one has pointed out the huge amount of prominently displayed swastikas in this video game. Ever think maybe repeatedly looking at them while playing prompted some people to design on for their logo? So its cool for them to be on my video game screen but not if I put them there? What does this say for the artists who created these video game levels? Are they obviously evil nazis for having drawn swastikas for use in this game? Or only the players that draw them and use them looked at that way?

  98. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Rallion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having deaths, events, emotions and other things attributed to them is actually exactly what symbols are for. It's kind of the definition.

  99. Context: guns by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of excellent points and counterpoints about the use of a swastika. The one thing that immediately jumps out at me is: this game is about war. In war, people equate Nazi and swastika. The use of swastika to show temples on maps makes sense in that context and I don't think anyone would mistake the use in that case.

    If you're adamant about reclaiming the swastika and you haven't already found a suitable outlet: http://reclaimtheswastika.com/

  100. Re:You know your game is about killing people, rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are brilliant and correct.

    But so too is the ban necessary.

    INTELLECTUAL DILEMMA!

  101. Iowa courthouse has swastikas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The courthouse in my county http://www.harrisoncountyia.org/information/courthouse.html was built in 1910, and has swastikas in the mosaic floor. It's not controversial, but then, the meaning of the symbol to the folks who built the courthouse was obviously not that they were fascists. If someone chose to put the same floor in a new building today, I'd question the motivation.

  102. Activision made the game, not Microsoft by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Activision made Call of Duty. Microsoft is banning people from Xbox Live. Those are two different parties, and their actions don't (necessarily) have anything to do with each other.

    Hard concept, I know, but please try to follow along.

    1. Re:Activision made the game, not Microsoft by Cederic · · Score: 1

      So Microsoft are merely commercially exploiting the violence, instead of using it to express themselves artistically (as Activision did)?

      I'm not sure what your point is here.

  103. Bummer by AdamThor · · Score: 1

    Bummer about XBL enforcement. I don't like to play with random other players even in XBL's garden because the average random xboxer is irritating, even with the official attempts to keep people from being offensive. I mostly just use XBL to hook up with friends that are remote from me. We play a custom Halo game we developed called "DICK CHENEY", where all weapons are shotgun and your radar is turned off (and friendly fire is on, in team variants). XBL changes the name of the game to "BLAM!", we figure that it doesn't like the word "DICK".

    Oh well. We all know what the game is, so it's not that big a deal. I think it's a funny joke, and it's a good game variant on top of that, so I'm gonna use this opportunity to tell you all about it.

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  104. Is the cross much different? by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    Sure, while most of the western world is (at a minimum) tolerant of the symbol of Christianity, the cross, it is something that is offensive to much of the Muslim world, because of its connection to the Crusades (and, for other dissenters within and around the church, the Inquisition). Are they banned because of these connotations?

    The swastika, like the cross, is a symbol, and symbols derive their meaning from the culture. Prior to the rise of Nazism and WWII, the swastika was a symbol that appeared in many cultures (Chinese, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Greek, native American) with connotations far different from those now associated with it. It became a German nationalist symbol in the early 20th Century, but was still present in symbology around the globe (and much architecture pre-dating WWII). According the the 45th Infantry Division Museum, that storied US Military unit (http://www.45thdivisionmuseum.com/History/SwastikaToThunderbird.html) wore the swastika as their unit insignia. It was chosen because it was a native American symbol for "good luck".

    Clearly, the meanings associated with such symbols change over time.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  105. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

    If some nation used the Christian cross as their symbol and committed a whole load of atrocities, do you think Christians would stop using the cross as a symbol? Somehow I doubt it.

    If you look at Spain and the inquisition........ Yes the Cross was used by a country and a huge number of atrocities was committed, under that symbol AND belief (despite what Christianity really stands for). In the case of the Nazis, they used the symbol, but dissasociated themselves from the belief.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  106. Outsourced by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Apparently this guy doesn't watch Outsourced. In "Home for the Diwalidays", Rajiv directs a group of employees to hang a swastika up high, as he raises his hand, arm fully extended at 45 degrees, and shouts "Higher! Higher!" Of course Todd, the American boss, is immediately scared and says it's offensive and orders it to be taken down. Everyone is shocked, and Rajiv compliments Todd on his Americanizing, and renames an employee with an American name.

  107. Anti-people by NuKe_MoNgOoSe · · Score: 1

    Is it really any wonder why i am an anti-person? Seriously you have to have a mental flak jacket to live in todays world. Nowadays there is not many things that DONT offend people. You cant censor xbox live you can try reaaaaaaalllllly hard but guess what as long as their is a medium of communication there will be ways to exploit it and insult people through it. Either verbally or symbolically or other. The fact that this is a issue is ridiculous its a part of history, albeit a dark part of history but a part of it regardless. Where does the line get drawn? Do we ban crosses because Christianity and the drones it produces offends me, do we ban digits so people cant put 666 in their gamer tag or how about Slayer because they are a iconic symbol of modern satanism.. Or maybe we ban tags referring to Justin Beiber because I hate his brand of music and find him to be a teenage jackoff... honestly where does the madness end?

    --
    When you dislike the human race as much as I do, Karma:Bad is inevitable lol.
  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    This was modded up funny, but, you know, that's kind of the heart of the matter.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  110. Re:You know your game is about killing people, rig by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    No moral dilemma at all.

    There is a big difference between fantasy and reality. Playing the game is fantasy. The reality is that tens of millions died in the war the Nazis started, under that symbol.

    Taking on their identity in an online game isn't fantasy, it's a very real slap in the face to everybody who fought, suffered, and died under them.

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
  111. Hungry troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's an american if it's not christian and belongs to any other religon then its deluded fantasy.

  112. Re:You know your game is about killing people, rig by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    This is the same moral dilemma I come across when I want to type the word "shit" in chat for just about any modern FPS. I can't say "shit", but I can blow someone's brains out and hump their corpse... sounds right to me!

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  113. Ok what if.. by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

    What if the swastika was in a white circle surrounded by red? I've seen this on Black Ops. That and this other guy had his set as an erect penis and balls spewing something. But hey... maybe the guy was a worshiper of the penis..
    <URL:http://www.cracked.com/article_16103_5-inspiring-religions-that-worship-penises.html/>
    I have the word Black in my Xbox gamertag. The amount of times I've heard the N bomb dropped on me is insane. People don't have a problem being blatantly racist online and there should be some action to be taken but really, there is nothing you can do. Try calling Microsoft, good luck! Using the built in complaint system uuggg! Complain, file offense, select user used offensive language... Nothing happens. After what 100 of these you get kicked or do you even? Even heard guy jerkin the meat on live in MW1&2 in the lobby on a public game. Sick!

  114. Maybe if the guy really cared about the East... by Shauni · · Score: 1

    If he had made the distinction between Western and Eastern, it might be less offensive. (then again, it might be more, as MS *claims* to be international and unbiased)

    Instead the distinction was "common knowledge" vs "niche Internet knowledge". Like somehow a religion practiced by millions of people is a "niche." That the alternative use of the symbol is "obscure" rather than simply a cultural difference.

    That is a crock of shit. Just because one ignorant white guy doesn't know about it doesn't mean it's obscure.

    1. Re:Maybe if the guy really cared about the East... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just millions... up to 1.3 billion, according to the wikipedia entries on Buddhism and Hinduism.

      Even though not all would use it, most would be familiar with it.

  115. wait..what? by VatuLevu · · Score: 0

    This is a Shooter so to me the whole -it's a religious symbol- argument doesn't hold much water because the actual symbol looks different and the "gamers" aren't using that symbol now are they? No they are using the right facing-45 degree tilted-Nazi one. That is what is being banned.
    they're two different things.

    --
    Vinaka Jo
  116. Agreed, its place in history is older than Nazis by lullabud · · Score: 1

    As an American, I was pretty alarmed the first time I vacationed in Vietnam and found so many swastika symbols everywhere. They were on the ceilings of temples, in the courtyards, and on people's grave stones. I took some photos, wondering what the symbolism was, having no idea that it was an ancient symbol.

    I posted the photos to flickr and they were invited to a flickr pool that is working towards showing the non-nazi uses of the symbol and how it has a bigger place in the timeline of history than just the German empire of the 40's.

    If anybody wants to see how it is used in other places, here is the flickr pool: http://www.flickr.com/groups/1207899@N24/

    Note: Like any brand, the Nazi's had their own logo. Not all swastikas are black white and red and rotated 45. The OP question was probably related specifically to the Nazi swastika.

  117. Best logo: Porn by lullabud · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you couldn't do this on Xbox Live, but in some HL2 mods like DoD:S some snipers would use high quality porn as their tag. I saw so many head-shots on people who paused to look.

  118. Re:Plenty people use the British flags by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the modern economy, where "Brands" are traded between companies like baseball cards.

    Disgusting, isn't it.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  119. Buddism by mathfeel · · Score: 1

    It is a traditional symbol for the Buddist, albeit at different orientation. Here is a picture of the huge status in HK: http://www.teachenglishinasia.net/files/images/giant-buddha-hongkong.preview.JPG

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  120. Re:US 45th Inf Division would like to speak with y by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    How does X-Box Live reconcile the fact that the Russian Communist Party killed many, many more of its own people than the NAZIs did, yet the hammer ad sickle are not banned?

    Hammer and sickle is not a symbol specifically of the Russian (did you mean to say "Soviet"?) communist party. It's a general symbol of communism. Some communists killed a lot of people, others did not. In general, the balance tends to be on the "killing" side - but the point is still that it's not something inherent to the ideology. Much like with religions, it's a matter of interpretation, and the spectrum is very broad - compare Rosa Luxemburg to Pol Pot.

    There's no such flexibilities with Nazism - it has racial discrimination and genocide as part of the very basics of the ideology.

  121. In the game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pathetic. It's in this and many other games but it can't be your avatar in these games?

  122. Re:US 45th Inf Division would like to speak with y by mvdwege · · Score: 1

    The fact that the 45th changed their symbol due to its association with National Socialism is proof that Toulouse's argument is correct. So why do you try to argue the reverse?

    Mart

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  123. Urusei Yatsura: Beautiful Dreamer by grikdog · · Score: 1

    The swastika is not only used, it's pink, in the Third Reich Decadent Coffee Shop segment of "Beautiful Dreamer." I have no idea what the intention was, because the anime was not pitched for non-Japanese when it first came out.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  124. new meaning of the word "interesting" by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    an interesting read if for no other reason than to get a peek inside the day-to-day issues the Xbox Live Enforcement team deals with."

    Definitely a new meaning to the word "interesting".

    Does anyone even know anybody with an Xbox (Live, Enforcement, or whatever version)? I don't (as far as I know).

    Actually, the article may well be interesting, but more likely as a view into the depths of political correctness than because of who the author is. Would he stay out of jail in Germany, for example?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"