Slashdot Mirror


Banknotes Go Electronic To Outwit Counterfeiters

suraj.sun writes "Modern banknotes contain up to 50 anti-counterfeiting features, but adding electronic circuits programmed to confirm the note's authenticity is perhaps the ultimate deterrent, and would also help to simplify banknote tracking. From the article: 'A team of German and Japanese researchers created arrays of thin-film transistors (TFTs) by carefully depositing gold, aluminum oxide and organic molecules directly onto the notes through a patterned mask, building up the TFTs layer by layer. The result is an undamaged banknote containing around 100 organic TFTs, each of which is less than 250 nanometres thick and can be operated with voltages of just 3V. Such small voltages could be transmitted wirelessly by an external reader, such as the kind that communicates with the RFID tags found on many products.'"

441 comments

  1. Go electronic! by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do we still carry money anyway?

    1. RE: Go electronic! by Nkwe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      For anonymous transactions. This puts that concept at risk.

    2. Re:Go electronic! by sohmc · · Score: 4, Informative

      How else are you going to tip your stripper?

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
    3. Re:Go electronic! by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd be amazed the places you can swipe a credit card

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:Go electronic! by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      I understand you've never been to Thailand, Spain or Brazil.... They accept credit cards and very generic stuff appears in your bill.

    5. Re:Go electronic! by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      I do because I don't like part of the credit card companies business model, and would rather pay cash when possible.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    6. Re:Go electronic! by DubThree · · Score: 2

      Have you ever tried to pay for crack-cocaine using a credit card or your PayPal account? It's tough. I've got to use banknotes or food stamps.

    7. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or strip your tipper?

    8. Re:Go electronic! by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Primarily so we can give it to who we want in the amounts we want, and we don't require Visa/Mastercard/Government/Paypal approving of the entity you are transacting with.

      Essentially it's actually an important piece of protecting our freedom.

    9. Re:Go electronic! by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      I know at least one place where the guy comes in a motorcycle to deliver you cocaine, and accepts credit card. Appears on the bill as pizza.

    10. Re:Go electronic! by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2

      A very large portion of the US Economy is conducted in cash. This is all to track that. To Track, to Control, to Tax.... Just another step towards the new economy for the New Age: Barter.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    11. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got my ass kicked by the bouncer the last time I tried to swipe my card between the stripper's buttocks in order to tip her.

    12. Re:Go electronic! by rolfwind · · Score: 2

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because some people recognize that once we go completely electronic, that the government will have you by the balls. Kiss any semblance of a free country goodbye.

      Being a Restaurateur in Germany used to be a fairly lucrative thing, even for a mom and pop operation - especially for a small operation. But fairly recently, if you operate a restaurant there, you have to have you cash register hooked up right to their version of the IRS. Automatic transfers taxes too and the like.

      Usually economies run well if the government tolerates a small amount of black market activity. The tighter grip they exert, the less productivity there is.

    13. Re:Go electronic! by spun · · Score: 2

      I know at least one place where the guy comes in a motorcycle to deliver you cocaine, and accepts credit card. Appears on the bill as pizza.

      Well, sure, cocaine. But not crack. As Whitney Houston said, "Crack is a poor person's drug."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    14. Re:Go electronic! by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Hey now, that is a job for Al Gore.

    15. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      I don't report cash income to the IRS. :)

    16. Re:Go electronic! by Nyder · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because when you pay people like me.

      I don't accept checks, money orders, paypal transactions, nor do I accept credit/debit cards.

      I do accept cash. United States Dollars, to be exact.

      What do I do?

      I fix your computer. I'm the guy, who makes house calls, to fix whatever the fuck you, or someone else did to mess up your computer.

      Sure, you can go to the geek squad, or pay some "professional" place to do it. chances are, they won't fix it correctly, charge you way more then I do, and don't do house calls. Not to mention they might report something you have on your computer to some government agency. You didn't know the pics of your kids in the bathtub is considered child porn? That would suck to find out on the way to jail.

      Or you can call me up, see when i'm free, and get your shit fixed correctly the first time. I also do the barter system, but that's mostly for weed dealers. Oh, and not only do I have better things to do then poke around your harddrive for whatever you have, I could care less what you have on your computer. Not my business, and your paying me cash to keep it not my business.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    17. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. A low cost sedan just pulled up and two guys in dark suits are getting out of the car.

    18. Re:Go electronic! by cacba · · Score: 2

      Take a picture of her tattooed QR code.

    19. Re:Go electronic! by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Cash = Anonymity.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    20. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do.

      One day the local beer store had problems with their network connection. Their debit and CC transactions were down for few hours. Two people in front of me couldn't pay. I just got my $20 bill, and paid for my beer.

      So yes, you don't have to carry cash. But once something happens to the network and you don't have access to your account, *you* are fucked. But if you like getting fucked by the system, don't have any cash. Then it's only a matter of when, not if.

    21. Re:Go electronic! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Because carrying money comes without extra cost?
      Because that way you have intuitive control about your spending?
      Because unlike credit cards, it cannot be tracked?
      Because it's often simply faster?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    22. Re: Go electronic! by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      Now here's an interesting thought--bear with me here--what if the serial number were generated as the public key to a private key hidden in the electronics in the note? That way, the authenticity could be verified easily, and, as a bonus, individual bills could be used as crypto keys.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    23. Re:Go electronic! by SLi · · Score: 1

      What I've been wondering (not that I'd hope to see it implemented) is why there are no bar codes in banknotes. Wouldn't that be a relatively cheap and low-tech way to enable rather widespread tracking?

    24. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So...you want to carry a government document...to prove you're free.

      Got it.

    25. Re: Go electronic! by vlm · · Score: 2

      Now here's an interesting thought--bear with me here--what if the serial number were generated as the public key to a private key hidden in the electronics in the note? That way, the authenticity could be verified easily, and, as a bonus, individual bills could be used as crypto keys.

      You need something more complicated to prevent "double spending"/multiple copies being made, and simply creating your own pub/priv pairs.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    26. Re:Go electronic! by snookerhog · · Score: 1

      but the question really is: will she have an RFID reader in her ass to verify your tips in the future?

    27. Re:Go electronic! by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...Essentially it's actually an important piece of protecting our freedom..."

      Was. (if this idiocy is implemented)

      The article basically describes RFID tech capable of being built into money. These RFIDs can be read at any point-of-sale cash register. No? Give the government a year or so, as this is the real purpose of all of this--tracking every fucking dollar spent (not to mention the person doing the spending).

      As with any RFID system, use your microwave oven liberally. 5 seconds is usually enough. If enough people do this, the whole scheme falls apart as constant "counterfeits" will be a deterrent to doing business and people won't trust the RFID pass/fail determintation. Besides, what happens if your hundred-dollar bill RFID malfunctions (from, say, being crumpled up in a pocket while going through the washer?) and no longer communicates? Are you out a hundred bucks? Will the clerk waiting for you to pay for a full shopping cart of groceries care?

      It isn't a collar unless you let them put it on you.

    28. Re:Go electronic! by Stregano · · Score: 2

      You swiped in the wrong spot.

      --
      The world is how you make it
    29. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Primarily so we can give it to who we want in the amounts we want, and we don't require Visa/Mastercard/Government/Paypal approving of the entity you are transacting with.

      Essentially it's actually an important piece of protecting our freedom.

      That is true, but many of us don't want Visa/MasterCard/Amex/Paypal charging a fee on every transaction.

    30. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Why do you need to make anonymous transactions?

      Ohhhh. You mean illegal transactions.

    31. Re:Go electronic! by Stregano · · Score: 1

      You can always send them money through PayPal.

      --
      The world is how you make it
    32. Re: Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      For anonymous transactions. This puts that concept at risk.

      Bank notes already tend to have unique identifiers. If this tech keeps them viable instead of forcing the use of electronic payment systems, this does more to protect anonymity than put it at risk.

    33. Re:Go electronic! by operagost · · Score: 2

      So the government can't take all your money instantly-- without due process, of course.

      That being said, they're collectively confiscating all of our wealth via inflation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    34. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      You sure they're Feds and not Mafia?

    35. Re:Go electronic! by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

      I pay in chickens.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    36. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a difference?

    37. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 2

      Dunno. I'm not going back to that bar.

    38. Re: Go electronic! by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      Well, to spend would require passing the token (read: handing over the bill) to the new owner.

      Key generation by private individuals could be prevented through custom exotic machine architecture without which the algorithms don't work--say, quantum-processed base-(largeprime) calculations. It wouldn't last forever, of course; doubtless, someone would be able to eventually crack the base-2305843009213693951 calculations that generate the keys, but by that time the new series of bills would be out ;-p

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    39. Re: Go electronic! by quantumRage · · Score: 1

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      For anonymous transactions. This puts that concept at risk.

      You may have noticed, but there are places where you can't pay with a card. Mostly at the countryside.

    40. Re: Go electronic! by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 2

      He means convenient transactions. Go shout that you have nothing to hide somewhere else.

    41. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, but I'm one of those crazy people who thinks that taxation is extortion and that a government is a protection racket whose button men wear camouflage.

    42. Re: Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us don't appreciate being tracked even when we are not breaking the law.

    43. Re:Go electronic! by golf2 · · Score: 1

      Well that and the fact that if you have a microwave and a common baking ingredient you can make your own crack at home with the delivered coke...

    44. Re:Go electronic! by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      My situation was a bit different:

      I don't.

      One day a fast food restaurant had problems with their network connection. Their debit and CC transactions were down for few hours. Two people in front of me paid cash. When I tried to use a card, they informed me of the network problem and I got my food for free because I didn't have cash on me.

      So yes, you can carry cash. But when something happens to the network and you don't have access to your account, you might get free stuff if you don't carry it. But if you don't like getting free stuff, carry cash. Then you'll always pay for everything.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    45. Re:Go electronic! by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because, from time to time, "stuff happens" resulting in no power & no telecom services and in that scenario, if you want to buy food for your kid, "cash is king." An example from recent history is the ice storm in '98 where some homes and businesses were without power for weeks. For this reason (I live in an earthquake zone) I have around two-hundred five-dollar bills hidden away in case I need them...

    46. Re:Go electronic! by santax · · Score: 1

      So the -fill in your local- government-bitches can't see what I do with it, since it's not their business. Yes, I understand fully why they want a traceable chip in money.

    47. Re: Go electronic! by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      There are also many transaction where someone receives money from a business; recycling bottles, pawn shops, garage sales, etc. Am I supposed to take a cheque, deposit it and wait for it to clear? Putting money into a bank account is more difficult than taking it out.

      I also have a side crafting business. I am not do enough transactions to have a credit card account so accept cash. Even if I did there are other issues. The hardware and service fees to do wireless transaction is not cheap. Some locations are outside wireless coverage. Some people will not use wireless for financial transactions. How am I to do business without cash?

      Electronic transactions are good for fixed point payments but there is still a huge cash economy.

    48. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and not only do I have better things to do then poke around your harddrive for whatever you have, I could care less what you have on your computer. Not my business, and your paying me cash to keep it not my business.

      And - honestly, what are the chances it's anything you haven't already seen anyway?

    49. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the good old days. I miss being that guy.

    50. Re:Go electronic! by bpeikes · · Score: 1

      Um, you're using currency produced by the government. If you want complete control, try carrying around gold ducats.

    51. Re:Go electronic! by lgw · · Score: 1

      For this reason (I live in an earthquake zone) I have around two-hundred five-dollar bills hidden away in case I need them...

      I keep some cash handy as well, but I fully expect it to be lost in any quake large enough that I would need it (hey, I never claimed this was rational).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    52. Re:Go electronic! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because they aren't a counterfeit measurement. Anyone could print a barcodes along with the note...you do know that barcodes are a key to looking up information, generally not information in and of themselves, right?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    53. Re: Go electronic! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      The public key could be signed with a private government key. Then your self-generated public/private pairs are useless because you don't have the private government key to sign your public key with.

      However I think the keys would be too long to be practical to be printed on the bank notes. What could work is if the serial number is just that, but the electronics contains the same serial number signed with both a government key (to proof the serial number has actually been issued by the government, because no one else has the government private key) and by a banknote private key which is stored in the electronics but not sent outside, but can be used to encrypt short random test data (say 32 bits). The banknote's public key would be signed by the government key, too, so a counterfeiter cannot simply create his own pair, and could be read from outside through the reading interface.

      I think this combination would be about the safest which is possible. You cannot create your own serial numbers (because you cannot government-sign them) nor your own public/private key pairs (because you cannot government-sign the public key), you cannot duplicate the banknote by just the data available from the interface (because the private key isn't directly accessible through that, but can be tested through test-encryption).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    54. Re:Go electronic! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Well that and the fact that if you have a microwave and a common baking ingredient you can make your own crack at home with the delivered coke...

      Every time I try that the stuff fizzes all over the place and I end up having to clean up the kitchen.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    55. Re:Go electronic! by ruthless+reader · · Score: 1

      Till strippers start carrying card readers people need to carry cash on them

    56. Re:Go electronic! by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "You didn't know the pics of your kids in the bathtub is considered child porn" ...
      "I could care less what you have on your computer. Not my business, and your paying me cash to keep it not my business."

      #1 Bathtub pics of kids is almost neveer likely to be consifered child porn

      #2 Are you saying if you see child porn on someone's computer you will look the other way because they are paying you in cash?

      #3 Why don't you accept other forms of payment? Are you trying to avoid paying taxes?

    57. Re: Go electronic! by vlm · · Score: 2

      Well, to spend would require passing the token (read: handing over the bill) to the new owner.

      Key generation by private individuals could be prevented through custom exotic machine architecture without which the algorithms don't work--say, quantum-processed base-(largeprime) calculations. It wouldn't last forever, of course; doubtless, someone would be able to eventually crack the base-2305843009213693951 calculations that generate the keys, but by that time the new series of bills would be out ;-p

      Well, if you put the private key in the US mint and use it as an oracle, all you need to do is make a million copies of the obviously well known pub key off any random note.

      If you put the private key in some kind of tamper proof smartcard oracle inside the note, all you need is a fake oracle that always says its public key is real.

      You can't distribute the private key to every verification terminal in known space, someone will put it on wikileaks and then, trillion digit bases or not, it'll be all over tee shirts and stuff just like the DVD keys incident.

      Decentralized anonymous authentication using two untrusted machines (the verifier and the banknote) is a harder problem than it first appears...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    58. Re:Go electronic! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's still a form of stored value that can be transacted between 2 parties without government interference (if the transfer is done physically). Can't say the same for Visa/Mastercard/Paypal/Bank of America.

    59. Re:Go electronic! by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2

      Usually economies run well if the government tolerates a small amount of black market activity. The tighter grip they exert, the less productivity there is.

      ...and the more star systems slip through their fingers.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    60. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because of Paypal.

    61. Re: Go electronic! by vlm · · Score: 2

      Why do you need to make anonymous transactions?

      Ohhhh. You mean illegal transactions.

      Do you mean illegal now, or illegal later? How can I know what will be illegal later, and thus protect myself now?

      You can understand why certain ethnic groups in Germany might be nervous at the idea of providing a financial record of all menorahs ever sold, even if at this point they are certainly currently legal. Who benefits from that kind of record? The people or the state?

      Same story different country and decade with ammo, alcohol, tobacco, certain firearm components, jtag smart card interfaces, gold coins...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    62. Re:Go electronic! by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      #1, read the news. It's been prosecuted before.

      #2, it's called professional ethics. Independent contractors have to have 'em, because their livelihood depends on their reputation. Corporate drones, less so--their 'reputations' hinge off the company's marketing.

      #3, I accept cashier's checks and cash, myself. Only accept a personal check if you know the person and you can kneecap 'em if it bounces. Credit cards aren't really in the books for most independent contractors on the consumer-maintainence side.

      (O'course, I try to -avoid- that side, myself; most of my contracting's done in other areas--but hey, if someone wants to pay me $60 to set up a printer and I have nothing else to do, I'm not about to turn it down, and at least when I do it I know it's done right).

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    63. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      How do I know those aren't rats with feathers glued on?

    64. Re:Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      #1 Bathtub pics of kids is almost neveer likely to be consifered child porn

      Tell that to the parents who’ve found police waiting at Walgreens when they come to pick up their 1-hour photos. IIRC I’ve heard about it happening more than once.

      #2 Are you saying if you see child porn on someone's computer you will look the other way because they are paying you in cash?

      I’m pretty sure he was saying that he has no intentions of poking around in folders where he has no business poking around in. Obviously if there are child porn pictures in a folder called “child porn pics” on the desktop, he’d be obligated to report it.

      #3 Why don't you accept other forms of payment? Are you trying to avoid paying taxes?

      Such as what? Personal check? And then you get to play the “don’t deposit it until Friday” game, and then when you deposit it on Monday it turns out they had an automatic bill payment that they’d forgotten about and the check bounces ... and you get to pay the returned check fee. Credit card, Paypal, etc. are hardly convenient. Cash is the only way to go. And what makes you assume he’s just doing it to avoid taxes? You seem to like assuming the worst.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    65. Re: Go electronic! by eulernet · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll give you an example.

      You have children who are living on their own, and you want to help them by giving them some money.

      Suppose that a system which tracks every bill exists, in order to follow the money flows.

      Once such a system exists, your children will be forced to pay taxes about this money.

      Treating everybody as a criminal is not a solution.
      BTW, I don't think such a thing will ever pass, since politicians like to use real money, and I doubt they'll put a system to track where their money is spent.

    66. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The government doesn't interfere in your credit transactions.

      In fact, this week they've done a lot to keep the credit processors from interfering in them as well.

      If you're making cash transactions and avoiding reporting income etc. to the government, that's not about interference, it's about you doing illegal things.

      The irony stands. If you want to transact free of the government, don't use the government's documents to do it. Barter. And make sure you barter for equal value using things that don't change value, or you'll have to report the gain/loss in value and that gets the audit bells ringing.

    67. Re:Go electronic! by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Above posters have already addressed privacy. I agree with that.

      But here's another reason: to keep market costs *real.*

      When you pay with a credit or debit card, the card network charges the business some amount just for the privilege of handing over your money. This nibbles away at the business's profitability, ie: the reason they stay open to sell you what you're after in the first place.

      With cash, you pay the same price, but the money stays between you and the business. You're not paying a VISA/MC/DISC/AMEX middleman for a "carry your money from A to B' fee.

      Cash is more efficient that electronic in that regard.

      Plus it makes it easier to fill up your piggy bank with spare change for a little splurge spending later on. (Can't do that with receipts!)

    68. Re:Go electronic! by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

      Depends on the barcode.

      2D. Datamatrix.

      You driver's License, barcode contains info, not just you license #.

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    69. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Plastic is at least 50% less inconvenient than cash.

      And I hide nothing. Whether I should or not is for the people who try to call me on it to risk.

    70. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      When you’re paying someone who accepts credit cards, perhaps. When you’re paying someone who doesn’t, it’s about 100% less convenient than cash.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    71. Re:Go electronic! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      The government can *easily* interfere with credit transactions. Witness Wikileaks, offshore gambling, and so forth. The government can't do much if I go to my bank, withdraw X amount of cash, and go hand it to someone.

    72. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Do you mean illegal now, or illegal later?

      I mean illegal now, because ex post facto laws are banned by the Constitution.

      As for menorahs, the Germans knew who the Jews were regardless of their names on invoices. As for worrying about being found out, if that's your worry, why are you staying in Germany when it's clear that reason and compassion are already out the window?

      I don't see any Germans coming for Jews around here, and I don't see the government coming for people who are currently doing legal things that may be illegal in the future for the things they are doing now.

      So what you're talking about isn't an actual problem, it's a fictional one, that can be made to remain fictional if you'll stop worrying about the fictional problems and spend your time on the real ones that the fictional ones are distracting you from.

      Go picket Fox News.

    73. Re:Go electronic! by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      not anymore

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    74. Re: Go electronic! by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      Can't tell if you're being trollish or funny here...

      I generally prefer anonyminity when paying for things because I know that if I use my interac card my information's being tracked by someone. They may not necessarily be directly looking at my spending habits and affecting me (i.e. sending me more flyers, because the bank released my home address to a company where I made an interac or visa purchase). But data like this is probably being collected (maybe illegally?) and being cross referenced and sold to advertisers or something. Again, maybe i'm not directly affected, but some other corporations may be benefiting by using or selling this knowledge and I'm not too content on helping them out.

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    75. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      I mean illegal now, because ex post facto laws are banned by the Constitution.

      The handgun legislation that existed not-too-long ago in Washington D.C. was banned by the Constitution too, but plenty of people were still forced to obey it or suffer consequences until the Supreme Court got around to striking it down.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    76. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      You just said that you want to be able to hide a crime so tracking crime is not a solution.

      First of all, that's fucking stupid. Just stop trying to reason like that. And if you couldn't teach your kids to be self-sufficient, then pay the gift tax and consider it your fault that you had to.

      Second, even if money was traceable, it would be illegal for the government to trace any of it, unless they had a warrant, and a warrant requires probable cause, which requires evidence or credible observation that a crime is being or is about to be committed.

      Third, the fact that we can't get politicians to keep their activities open and legal is the proximate problem. Work on fixing that, not on preventing imaginary problems that aren't occurring.

    77. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bathtub pics of kids is almost neveer likely to be consifered child porn

      No, just hella embarrassing 20 years later. Why do parents do this? They've even started doing it online, for cryin' out loud. I was never able to find a tactful way to grab my married w/kids associates by the throat, shake them, and say WTF???

    78. Re:Go electronic! by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      Great answer sir.

      I'm going to add to that and say not just because of some other entity approving, but also so that said approving entity does not make any profit off the the transaction (seller pays a % for CC transactions, buyer pays a monthly fee and /or change per interac transaction

      Also, those transactions may be used in some cross referencing - advertising - purchasing trend that's being sold somewhere, which I generally don't want to be a part of.

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    79. Re:Go electronic! by igreaterthanu · · Score: 1

      A very large portion of the US Economy is conducted in cash. This is all to track that.

      A chip on a note does not magically make it tracked; it can change hands without going through a computer, unlike with credit cards. So tracking would have to be done at particular points, perhaps whenever cash is deposited or withdrawn from a bank.

      How hard is it to track using the unique IDs on the notes? Surely an OCR machine is quicker (and cheaper) than something involving electronics on the notes themselves.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    80. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      First, that rulling was political horseshit. Future courts will read the Constitution again and realize that Roberts et al were in on the fix, and will reverse it.

      Second, That's how the law works. Law enforcement is beholden to the laws that are in force, not to your interpretation of the constitution. When the law is in force, law enforcement enforces that law. When the law gets struck down, they stop. They may even apologize for having to do it, but in this case, in that town, don't bet on it. Too many cops getting shot or shot at for them to have any humor about Republican political manipulations of the 2nd Amendment.

      So when the ruling is reversed by a future ruling and the law comes back, double jeopardy will protect anyone freed under the current ruling, and ex post fact will protect anyone violating that wording until the law comes back, but the law will be back and it will be enforced as written.

    81. Re: Go electronic! by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      But such a thing exist – at least in the USA. There does exist breakpoints where you have to report transfers. The Government treats independent instate residences more favorably then out of state dependent children. Want to avoid estate tax by giving out funds before you pass on? Maybe you will need to pay taxes.

    82. Re:Go electronic! by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Um, you're using currency produced by the government.

      What do I care who produces it? I only care if its controllable / traceable.

      If you want complete control, try carrying around gold ducats.

      What would be the point? What can you buy with them? For it to be much use it needs to be untraced/uncontrolled and legal tender.

    83. Re:Go electronic! by mlts · · Score: 1

      Or he has clients who pay him enough that he can be choosy who he works for. I'm sure there are people who happily do IT work, all cash, and part of the cash is to ensure that what is stored on the machines stays there and doesn't end up on a torrent somewhere, in the hands of an opposing attorney, or God forbid, in the evidence locker at the county PD. The downside of that is that the IRS doesn't like unreported income, so even though it is cash, it should be reported anyway. This way, someone who pays cash doesn't have a way to blackmail if the cash isn't reported as earnings.

      If you are good (senior sysadmin/IT architect level) at IT work, all you need are 4-5 SMBs that you do work for on an occasional basis, and that can be enough to make a decent living.

    84. Re:Go electronic! by moeluv · · Score: 1

      Barter is a great way to do business. I trade stuff from my garden to the neighbor, who raises chickens, for eggs. I need a new front step built for my porch so I rebuilt a PC for a mason I know he is pouring my new step when the weather gets decent in spring. I do business by barter anytime I can and definitely encourage everyone to do the same.

    85. Re:Go electronic! by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      - To give money to a friend or family member
      - To leave a tip
      - Purchase off of someone who doesn't have interac - i.e. a vendor at a sporting event, a street peddler at a farmers market etc..
      - Drugs, Casinos, Stippers
      - Its just faster

      Regarding the last point, I've been to a few fast food places and bars where they have a sign specifically telling people that interac is not accepted at that location. One of the reasons might be that the retailer doesn't want to pay for transaction fees (for credit cards), or they own the bank machine in the location and want to make a profit off of it. But the main reason in a fast paced environment is to just avoid long line-ups. Interac is somewhat faster now, but 5 years ago you might have to wait 30-45 seconds for the damn dial-up connection to process the payment. Even now, cash transactions are still faster, a cashier getting change is almost always done faster than a customer swiping the card, punching in the key code and waiting for it to process.

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    86. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      That goes both ways. Some businesses take plastic but not cash. Almost no businesses take pennies for anything more than a dollar transaction, if that.

      And get used to plastic follies. The ruling this week means that merchants will be able to pick and choose the cards they take even more than before. They used to be able to tell you they take Visa but not MC or AmEx, but now they will be able to tell you they take Bank of Noodlevania Visa but not Bank of North Noodlevania Visa.

      AmEx should be less affected, since it's the only bank that issues AmEx cards, but MC and Visa aren't banks, and have dozens or hundreds of banks issuing their cards, all with differing rates and fees that merchants are now allowed to disclose. The effect on AmEx will be that merchants will suddenly see the number of cards they pay attention to has increased, so they may cut AmEx from the list just to make the list smaller, and it goes first because it has the highest fees (it always has the highest fees, but it brings the best customers, which is why it's accepted at all).

    87. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      First, that rulling was political horseshit.

      In other words, you’re right, and anybody who says otherwise, including the Supreme Court, is wrong. Why am I not surprised...

      Future courts will read the Constitution again and realize that Roberts et al were in on the fix, and will reverse it.

      Keep dreaming, troll.

      Second, That's how the law works. Law enforcement is beholden to the laws that are in force, not to your interpretation of the constitution. When the law is in force, law enforcement enforces that law. When the law gets struck down, they stop.

      You basically just completely contradicted your initial claim, which was that nobody needs to worry about an unconstitutional law (like an ex post facto law) ever being passed and enforced.

      Now you’re claiming that unconstitutional laws can and will be passed and enforced until they get struck down, which was my point all along.

      Go troll someone else.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    88. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The fact is, the government, with a warrant, can interfere in every aspect of your life. And if they're on to something illegal, they should be. And if they aren't on to something illegal, then you're right to get indignant, and I'll be glad to help you thump them. Until then, all you're trying to do is make it easier to do something illegal for them to get onto.

    89. Re:Go electronic! by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      These RFIDs can be read at any point-of-sale cash register. No? Give the government a year or so

      Someday, but a year? Not even close. There are plenty of retailers still using pre-broadband POS systems. Eventually they all get swapped out, but a year is optimistic (or pessimistic given your POV) even for the ones that go cutting edge. This stuff moves slowwwwwwwwwwwwly.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    90. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      That goes both ways. Some businesses take plastic but not cash. Almost no businesses take pennies for anything more than a dollar transaction, if that.

      Pedantry aside, I’ve never had a problem managing to pay for something in cash, apart from the odd vending machine that wouldn’t take my dollar bills or the payments which were too large for me to comfortably carry that much cash (in which case I used a cashier’s check, which is equivalent to cash anyway).

      And I use my credit card for purchases of a few dollars and cents, too, so I’m well aware of the conveniences of plastic. But don’t act like the only reason anyone would need to carry paper money is for illegal purposes. That’s just plain retarded.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    91. Re:Go electronic! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      There is a *huge* difference between the government getting in the way of me making a cash transaction, (as I have recourse through the courts) and the government telling Visa/Mastercard/Paypal/Bank Of America "it'd be a really bad idea to process those transactions". Those "private businesses" are under no obligation to process my transaction, while the US government is going to have to expend serious effort to show why a private party transaction with currency shouldn't be permitted to take place (depending on legality of said transaction).

    92. Re:Go electronic! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And it's their loss of business because they're afraid to use a manual card imprinter - you know, the hard swiper with the carbon paper? Sure, you might get a couple declined cards when everything comes back up and you go to enter them in - but it's better to do that than to lose all the business of the cashless youth.
       
      Last time I went through a fast food drive through when the card machines were down, they didn't even tell me - I only figured it out when I signed the paper receipt from the manual imprinter. I know that other places act all crippled when the Internet's down or whatever. But there's other people that can handle it just fine.

    93. Re:Go electronic! by igreaterthanu · · Score: 1

      But once something happens to the network and you don't have access to your account, *you* are fucked.

      That's precisely why I carry cash with me, only $40. It's been in my wallet for over a year*. Simply for insurance against network failure.

      Cash is inconvenient, it's only good as a backup against failure. Now obviously some people are going to be using outdated systems, this is not a strength of cash, it is a weakness in the implementation of electronic currency.

      *I have used other cash but that was for the sole purpose of getting rid of it without having to visit the bank to deposit it.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    94. Re: Go electronic! by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Illegal/ legal is just an opinion. If X doesn't harm any specific person, then It's nobodies business if I do X.

    95. Re:Go electronic! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      When I spend it, my brain registers the amount, and budgets better. No other company gets a cut of every amount I spend (only the merchant I'm paying). For small transactions, there's not a ridiculous flat rate the merchant pays for the transaction (something like $0.40 if using debit). There's no way I can overdraw any accounts.

    96. Re:Go electronic! by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see anyone counterfeit an Australian polymer banknote especially with it's built in holographic security. A few countries now use similar technology for their currencies, why the USA still uses antiquated paper notes that can be easily damaged and also don't last long in circulation beats me.

    97. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you said that, because I was unable to infer anything like that from the GP.

    98. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 0

      No, I'm right, and the Supreme Court in this case was wrong, and I understand how it was wrong, and how it can be reversed, since it's reversing its own earlier decisions with this one. You'll maybe want to look up the history of 2nd Amendment cases in the SCOTUS, because I have, and it's gone every direction possible.

      You basically just completely contradicted your initial claim, which was that nobody needs to worry about an unconstitutional law (like an ex post facto law) ever being passed and enforced.

      No, I'm saying that you shouldn't be worried about not committing what you think will become illegal, you should be putting your effort into preventing the unconstitutional law from being passed, if anyone is ever stupid enough to propose it, and then into using their arrest and conviction of you to get it overturned. Fight the battles you do get, not the ones you will probably never get.

      Which brings us back to the point: Keeping the money system an exhorbitantly expensive and complicated system of printing special documents, implementing security measures, and conducting interdictions is even more trouble than that. Not to mention the enormous number of crimes that are enabled by the nature of dollar bills as an anonymous, theivable, untraceable container of wealth. Balancing that against your naive misunderstanding of the Constitution and your desire to do things that your persecution fantasies are trepidatious about, I'd choose to have the e-Dollar in any second of any day.

      Here, you dropped your badge: "troll". Twice.

    99. Re:Go electronic! by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Cash transactions are faster to process than credit card or debit card transactions. (I am appalled by the number of people who don't carry any cash around, and thereby hold up the line while their two-dollar coffee purchase is processed.)

      Cash transactions require no special equipment on the part of the merchant.

      Cash transactions do not incur processing fees for customer or merchant, and therefore don't add a hidden markup of two to four percent to every purchase you make.

      Cash transactions do not require electricity or network connectivity. (Remember the 2003 blackout? 50 million people without power for hours or days?) Cash is not vulnerable to a fire at a bank's server farm half a world away.

      Cash transactions are less susceptible to breaches of privacy.

      Are those enough reasons?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    100. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private debts. As in, not traceable by the entities, or overseers which produced said currency.

      The day private debt becomes vacant, is the day armed revolution occurs. Only the ignorant would ask why.

    101. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Payback for all the shit you little bastards put us through! And the laughs.

    102. Re:Go electronic! by fooslacker · · Score: 1

      To avoid government scrutiny of my actions when not aligned with the 's beliefs.

      In all seriousness, for private transactions between private citizens in private homes but for most things your point is valid. The problem is it's the exceptions that are important to preserving personal freedom not the normal cases. It's analogous to why it's important that we defend free speech for Nazi's and hate mongers despite the fact that we (or at least I) detest them and their beliefs. If a given right or principle isn't universally defended then someday someone will take it from you as well.

      That said in this case even if they do make monetary notes completely traceable and unforgeable (unlikely) some stand in for value and/or a barter system will likely evolve for private transactions so despite my semi-tongue-in-cheek paranoia this is unlikely to be a serious issue long-term.

    103. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      And if X doesn't break any laws the government has no interest in you, so you might as well pay with your MasterCard.

      So why do you have to have cash to do X, again?

      Oh, and

      legal/ legal is just an opinion.

      is not something you should say to a judge when you're the one in the handcuffs. It's been tried before, and all the precedents say it's not sufficient argument. You'll have to have something specific as to why what you did was illegal but its illegality is the suspect part of the equation. Preferably something based on the facts of the law and not your opinions of the law.

    104. Re:Go electronic! by fooslacker · · Score: 1

      oops...the first sentence should read...

      "To avoid government scrutiny of my actions when not aligned with (insert your least favorite ruling party)'s beliefs."

      I made the mistake of using tag brackets instead of parentheses. =)

    105. Re:Go electronic! by jimgarrity · · Score: 1

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      I use cash to support local businesspeople, especially family owned businesses. Every time I use a credit card, the owner/manager gets to pay between 1 and 3 percent to the credit card company. When I pay cash, the owner/manager gets to decide what to do with that 1 to 3 percent. Whatever is done with the money, it very probably stays local. You can be absolutely certain that when completely accountable "new money" is required, the banks will do the accounting for it.. for between 1 and 3 percent. of EVERYTHING.

    106. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about money printed by private companies?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_banknotes#Scotland

    107. Re:Go electronic! by yurtinus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait what? Currency may have it's faults, but it's been a long time since it was feasible to barter for anything. Part of industrialization (and specialization) means that what you produce won't be valuable to everybody. I can't exactly trade some software coding work with the farmer up the highway for some eggs, but I can trade it for some money from a software company and then use that money to buy my eggs. There's no reason to look so far backwards when trying to be "free." It's unfortunate the steps governments have taken these days to get the impression that anything a government can do is automatically restricting to freedom - but realistically speaking, without a small government with a rule of law and protection of property, you *can't* be free. Try bartering anything when the guy with the bigger guns will simply take what he wants. I'll be the first to stand up and say the government has far overstepped its bounds, but claiming there's more freedom in using a Mastercard than a nationally recognized legal tender is asinine.

      Cash transactions are not to avoid reporting income. It's to buy what I want from who I want without anybody snooping into the details, government or otherwise.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    108. Re:Go electronic! by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      For it to be much use it needs to be untraced/uncontrolled and legal tender.

      Let me say to you sir: that's how terrorists think.

      </sarcasm>

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    109. Re:Go electronic! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Because it just works.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    110. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I never troll, but sometimes I can be funny and serious at the same time. In fact, I prefer it.

      I prefer to use plastic because then (a) I can track me and tell where my budgeting is going off the rails; (b) I know I have enough every time I go into the store (corrollary: I go to the bank a lot less and don't have to carry a gaudy wad around, except in Vegas, but Vegas is all about the hip tumor); (c) I can reverse a transaction by remote control; (d) I get rewarded for using it (this is a false economy; those rewards are part of the merchants fees and therefor part of the purchase price, and merchants either love them or hate them depending on whether it's bringing them business or just costing them margin on existing business; regardless, it's like I get free stuff every few months); (e) you have any idea where most cash has been? (okay, i'll tell you: it went from the fingers of a bus-station janitor into the ass-crack of a stripper just before you got it in change at the bar*).

      Mostly it's the need not to predict how much I have to carry that creates daily value. And the fact that it can be de-monetized with a phone call if I lose it or it gets stolen. Cash? If I lose that it's gone. Not good.

      Your reasons, mainly centering on not wanting to be advertised to by people who sell things you might be interested in buying, are far-fetched. I don't think I get any snail-mail that was linked to any of my plastic. Mostly it's from merchants I dealt with directly an gave my address for deliveries or security reasons.

      * - okay, yeah, if there's no cash I can't "make it rain", but trust me, change the form of payment and the strippers will start carrying micro-expressPay terminals. Save them having to keep going back to the locker room to stash the stuff all the time. Cleaner and more efficient all around.

    111. Re:Go electronic! by Garth+Smith · · Score: 2

      MasterCard and Visa charge a significant service fee to every merchant that accepts them. This in fact raises the cost of goods by several percent. Of course the trade off is that money can move around easily and quickly which would have a positive effect on the cost of the good. It has now reached a point where people are even asking what the purpose of cash is anymore. When everyone treats credit cards as the de facto standard of payment, the card companies are making money off every transaction that occurs. This is one reason why credit card companies would love businesses to start using credit cards. They can make money first off the merchant and then again off the customer.

      The duopoly of MasterCard and Visa now have a lock on the market, and by working together can skim money off most consumer transactions while pushing all costs to the merchant. This is their prize for setting up and controlling the infrastructure that moves those electrons around. However, just because the card companies have the power to skim money off every transaction doesn't make it right. Consider for a moment, a percentage taken from *every* transaction made. What kind of effect on the economy would that have? And this cut isn't like taxes that pay for roads and schools. The goal is to make billions for just a few people. (I haven't even gotten to interest rates, fees, or the many other ways to squeeze money out of a consumer.)

      For these reasons I stop by the ATM on my walk to work and pay with cash whenever I can. I also like knowing that the hard working businesses I support will get to keep a bit more of my cash. In fact, a few restaurants in my area have decided MasterCard and Visa's "vig" is too much and only take cash.

      But perhaps the most important reason of all: My herb dealer doesn't take credit.

    112. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      No, it's about the same amount of legal work. It's just more legwork. They can stop an overseas wire payment to al Quaeda with a phone call. They'll have to send a SWAT team to keep you from buying grey-market beanie babies. But in both cases they'll have to bring the probable cause. Making their job harder won't stop them from doing it; at least not for the right reasons.

    113. Re: Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The push is for electronic everything. ID cards and mandatory registrations,
      that also have the convenient side effect of excommunicating those
      who do not play along. You will, if you don't already, need an ID for any
      prescription meds. Monetary transactions eventually follow the same path.
      It will be implemented quickly and in a pervasive manner, just as soon
      as the actual method of payment becomes "incredibly convenient".
      Think automatic supermarket check-out where you take the whole basket
      through the gate *bleep* and then wave your wrist at the terminal. Done.
      Never you mind that if for whatever reason you must hide from the law,
      it is your bank account, your lifeline, that will be suspended or severed.
      And you wouldn't turn to your mother for help, because the same restrictions
      may extend to those who "aid the illegals".

    114. Re:Go electronic! by real+gumby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Your quip is clever and funny, but to be serious for a second it is important to realise that government a priori does not automatically mean "nonfree" however much the popular rhetoric says so. For example the existance of maintained public roads increases your freedom of movement. A putatively impartial judiciary that enforces contract increases your freedom of commerce. A public agency that hunts down murderers increases your freedom unless you're a murderer etc etc.

      OK OK, that being said we can start to argue about the dividing line in enabling and restrictive freedoms, Leviathan, 8000 years of political philosophy, abuse of power etc. But the point remains: people form and participate in/with governments because they feel they will be more free with them than without them. And people are fallible....quite fallible.

      (and for the record this cash tracking is a horrible idea)

    115. Re:Go electronic! by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because then it'd be called a politician.

    116. Re: Go electronic! by CoderJoe · · Score: 1

      Business are REQUIRED to take cash. This includes such things as apartment rental fees. "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private"

      In the rent direction, if you try to pay in cash and the owner declines, for several months, and then tries to take you to court or evict over failure to pay rent, the judge will laugh the case out of court. I've heard at least one such story. The owner wound up having to null out the past debt, too.

    117. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I have.

      A convenience store in a high traffic area at a busy time of day refused a $20 bill for a $2 purchase.

      Why? Because it would have taken one of the two clerks 30 seconds to convince the change safe to drop a wad of smaller bills, and while they weren't yet out of smaller bills in the till, they didn't want to have to slow the flow at that time of day to do the work.

      If I'd had a card of some sort it would have been no question.

      And I'm not saying paper money can't be used for other purposes. I'm just saying it's not absolutely necessary for any purpose. Unless your purpose is illegal, you really have no economically realistic excuse for keeping cash around. Plastic is super-easy to carry and process, and the terminal box with the PIN pad is cheaper to make than those heavy, unbreakable, lockable cash drawers that wouldn't be needed any more.

    118. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Which are a dime a dozen, and therefore not much good in serious transactions.

    119. Re: Go electronic! by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    120. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Business are REQUIRED to take cash.

      No they aren't. Not generally. That legend on the money is a confidence booster, it doesn't confer any special rights on either party.

      As for the landlord situation, if the attempt to pay was reasonable the landlord didn't have any excuse for not accepting payment in cash. But if it was in bags of coins or the cash was defaced or made to smell bad it wouldn't be reasonable. If the lease specified that payment must be in the form of a check the landlord should have started enforcing penalties the first time the lease was not followed.

      You can also sometimes end up with ignorant judges (John Ashcroft) who think that common sense is the same thing as the law. They fuck up the judicial system something awful.

    121. Re:Go electronic! by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Some clubs already force patrons to buy scrip in advance.

    122. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Was. (if this idiocy is implemented)

      The article basically describes RFID tech capable of being built into money. These RFIDs can be read at any point-of-sale cash register. No? Give the government a year or so, as this is the real purpose of all of this--tracking every fucking dollar spent (not to mention the person doing the spending).

      As with any RFID system, use your microwave oven liberally. 5 seconds is usually enough. If enough people do this, the whole scheme falls apart as constant "counterfeits" will be a deterrent to doing business and people won't trust the RFID pass/fail determintation. Besides, what happens if your hundred-dollar bill RFID malfunctions (from, say, being crumpled up in a pocket while going through the washer?) and no longer communicates? Are you out a hundred bucks? Will the clerk waiting for you to pay for a full shopping cart of groceries care?

      It isn't a collar unless you let them put it on you.

      As a christian, stories about tracking purchases are very interesting to me. End-time prophecies say that we'll eventually end up with a one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time. Say something bad about the government? Associate with the wrong people? Refuse to take this mark that says you agree to worship the mandated one-world religion instead of whoever you want? No transaction for you... and the police will be there in a moment. Please remain calm.

      Just 30 years ago, none of us thought this would be in our lifetimes. After all, who could imagine stringing together 1,000,000 apple 2Es over phone lines to make this work? Now? I think I could design the system myself. We're not supposed to set dates. But at least this part of the puzzle can happen pretty much right now.

      Ordinarily, I'd think about this stuff and feel a sense of dread. But I'll be gone when all this happens. It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess. ;-)

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    123. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, Sir, are an idiot. You haven't "got" anything.

    124. Re: Go electronic! by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      legal/ legal is just an opinion.

      is not something you should say to a judge when you're the one in the handcuffs. It's been tried before, and all the precedents say it's not sufficient argument. You'll have to have something specific as to why what you did was illegal but its illegality is the suspect part of the equation. Preferably something based on the facts of the law and not your opinions of the law.

      Do you know the difference between fact and opinion?

      Fact- something that is real, certain existing.

      Opinion -addition, distortion, or deletion of that reality.

      Lets take a set of facts: 1, I yell "I'm going to kill you" and then 2. break a chair over your head. Those are the facts. That I assaulted you is just an opinion, an addition, that is an interpretation of those facts. No study of the facts alone will reveal weather what I did was legal or illegal. To get that you need the addition of a legal opinion.

      You go around talking about facts of law while ignoring the fact that all law is an opinion. Factually what is a law? Factually the law is the opinion of a group of men and women who do business as the barrel of a gun. In a positivist framework, which is held by almost every modern, there is no factual or qualitative difference between the operation of law keepers and the operation of criminals. If a criminal holds a gun against your head and tells you that you should do X, then that is factually the same as making a law. Now I'm not going to tell the criminal at that moment, "Well X is just you opinion", but that doesn't mean it isn't just his opinion.

    125. Re:Go electronic! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      You're just saying that because you're trying to wiggle out of our deal for the 50 politicians I took off you're hands. You owe me $0.40, dammit

    126. Re:Go electronic! by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      ...try carrying around gold ducats.

      I would, but he's still broken up about Ziyal.

    127. Re:Go electronic! by hurfy · · Score: 1

      STILL using?

      The one they sent 6 months still requires a phone line :(

      For the record i don't even have a cash register so you are safe here for some time yet.

      Why can i hunt and peck three times as fast as this box can display it ?!?!? Everything here seems to be getting slower and slower :(

    128. Re:Go electronic! by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Fuck that! I have a rather large investment in older printers, bought for cash and ink. The current "mark with a pen and if it show good, take it" has made me millions upon millions of dollars.

    129. Re:Go electronic! by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      Before Paypal, Mastercard and Visa started blocking wikileaks without any court rulings, I would have asked the same question.

    130. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Eh. I do (reacted) for a living currently. I give my customers 10% off if they pay in cash, and give them a preprinted receipt with a bogus company on it. (fuck you IRS, find me if you can!!!!!) Saves them the sales tax and gives them 10% off, and the cash goes straight into my pocket. And that cash goes to pay for my rent, in an apartment that does not exist, using cable that is in the name of a non-existent person, driving a car that is registered in another county. Fuck the government and their attempts to steal my money through taxes and other BS.

    131. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you going to get your porn anonymously?

    132. Re:Go electronic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      End-time prophecies say that we'll eventually end up with a one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time.

      Not without a lot of baseless guesswork, they don't.

    133. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a christian, stories about tracking purchases are very interesting to me.

      First of all, 'stories' cannot be described as being 'christian' in that sense.

      Secondly, 'As a christian' is expected to modify a singular subject, but you have it modifying a plural subject, namely 'stories'.

      You have written what is called a 'dangling modifier'. What you meant to write is the following: 'As a christian, I find stories about tracking purchases very interesting.'

    134. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 0

      Not without a lot of baseless guesswork, they don't.

      Revelation 13:16-17

      It (the beast/the antichrist together with the false prophet) also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

      Sounds pretty clear to me. You'll find that christians will most likely happily go to their death before agreeing to an implanted RFID (or similar) chip used to facilitate buying and selling.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    135. Re:Go electronic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      It (the beast/the antichrist together with the false prophet) also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

      Can you explain how this equates to a "one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time"? It would seem to me that a much more trivial interpretation would be a law enacted such that no-one can trade with people not bearing the "mark".

      You'll find that christians will most likely happily go to their death before agreeing to an implanted RFID (or similar) chip used to facilitate buying and selling.

      The prophecy quite specifically talks about a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. It would seem that implanting an RFID chip into the left hand should not pose any problem to Christians.

    136. Re:Go electronic! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Is there a difference?

      The Mafia is generally more honest.

    137. Re: Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Fact: The definition of assault includes touching someone with intent to injure them or placing them in reasonable belief that you will do so.
      Fact: Your threat prior to committing the assault indicated that your assault was an attempt to kill.
      Fact: You did commit assault, by hitting me with a chair after telling me that you intended to harm me, you just don't know if it was justified.
      Fact: If it's not justified, assault and assault with intent to kill are illegal.
      Fact: You gave no justification in line with the definition in the law of the justification for assault when presenting the facts in your defense, so per the facts there is no justification that can be applied.

      Opinion of the court: You are guilty of the crime of assault with intent to kill.

      The opinion of the court is a fact based on other facts. It's called an "opinion" because it applies the law to the particular case. That's what "opinion" really means: it's a judgment of a particular instance. If it were a judgment on a class of instances it would be an "attitude". If it were a judgment on all instances based on societal norms it would be a "more" ("mo-ray"). Most people think that opinion is a judgment on an abstraction, but they're incorrectly expanding from opinions on the facts of abstractions to all opinions when they do that, and further mistaking their attitude about the abstraction as an opinion about it.

      In a positivist framework, which is held by almost every modern, there is no factual or qualitative difference between the operation of law keepers and the operation of criminals.

      Every modern what? Every modern idiot?

      There's a difference between the lawkeepers and the lawbreakers, and that's justification. The lawkeepers also try to uphold their responsibility not to make things worse, while the lawbreakers don't give a flying fuck. When a lawkeeper does something bad, it's a big deal to us all, makes a public stink, and we act on it. When a lawbreaker does something bad, the booking officer increments that box on the charge sheet and continues turning the crank with hardly anyone outside the perp, the cops, the court, and the victim ever knowing about it.

    138. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because carrying money comes without extra cost?
      Because that way you have intuitive control about your spending?
      Because unlike credit cards, it cannot be tracked?
      Because it's often simply faster?

      Yes to all the above. Ever since I had a newspaper delivery route and had a wad of cash after collecting from the customers, I've felt a little naked without a couple of hundred bucks in my wallet.

      Also, credit cards can be canceled/blocked, ie, someone uses your cc number in another city and your cc company blocks to stop further fraud.

    139. Re:Go electronic! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Hey. It was an auction. You bid, you won, you got what was advertised. No givebacks.

      Which makes me wonder if the big, opaque hedge funds are running a storefront website hocking the names of every politician in office or likely to run for office in the next election...

      It would explain a lot.

    140. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, won't they just refer you to your local bank for money they won't accept? The trick is to let that stop happening.

    141. Re:Go electronic! by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but your wife is planning to go back to all cash soon, since she is developing a rash from the mag stripe.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    142. Re:Go electronic! by TheLink · · Score: 2

      MasterCard and Visa charge a significant service fee to every merchant that accepts them. This in fact raises the cost of goods by several percent. Of course the trade off is that money can move around easily and quickly which would have a positive effect on the cost of the good.

      And in some cases more safely. That's why some merchants are actually quite happy with credit card transactions - smaller amounts of cash "just waiting" to be stolen/lost.

      However, just because the card companies have the power to skim money off every transaction doesn't make it right. Consider for a moment, a percentage taken from *every* transaction made. What kind of effect on the economy would that have? And this cut isn't like taxes that pay for roads and schools. The goal is to make billions for just a few people. (I haven't even gotten to interest rates, fees, or the many other ways to squeeze money out of a consumer.)

      So what if the Government undercut them? Visa and Mastercard will be very unhappy of course but that might be a feature not a flaw :).

      --
    143. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ordinarily, I'd think about this stuff and feel a sense of dread. But I'll be gone when all this happens. It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess. ;-)

      So you're ready to welcome a dystopian, oppressive government, on the assumption that god will rescue you before things get too bad? There have been plenty of fascist governments in the past ~2000 years, and people have been predicting the end of the world would happen "any day now" for at least that long. Logically, it seems a lot more likely that this is just some powerful people being assholes, and that it would be better to try to stop them than to just give up and hope for divine intervention.

      Even if you're right, I'm pretty sure trying to do good and help people, even if they're the 'wrong' religion and you think they're doomed, is a lot more likely to get you into heaven than just saying "Fuck 'em, I'm good and pious and humble - I've got it made. Let them solve their own problems!"

    144. Re:Go electronic! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those crazy people who thinks that taxation is extortion and that a government is a protection racket whose button men wear camouflage.

      If you use the same currency (and other stuff) the Government establishes, why the big objection to having to paying the tax? [1]

      After all if they really want to tax you they can always create more of the currency and "tax" you via inflation. There have been trillions of US dollars created since 2008. And since many in the rest of the world (including countries) hold net positive US dollars, they have similarly been taxed whether they realize it or not.

      [1] Reference: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2022:17-21&version=NIV

      --
    145. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because a roll of coins is a far more effective weapon than a credit card, unless you are extremely skillful.

    146. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #1 Bathtub pics of kids is almost neveer likely to be consifered child porn

      I'm pretty sure he was saying that he has no intentions of poking around in folders where he has no business poking around in. Obviously if there are child porn pictures in a folder called "child porn pics" on the desktop, he'd be obligated to report it.

      Thing is I'm sure many of us have wanked off to pictures of sexy women who are fully dressed (or somewhat less fully dressed ;) ). So wouldn't the people who find children sexually attractive also find certain pictures of fully dressed children "satisfying" in a similar way?

      BUT most of us never would have raped those women, even if they were naked next to us (I'd probably be too shy and/or have a busted blood vessel :p ). I think you would have to have sadistic tendencies otherwise it won't work (won't do it for me if the girl isn't enjoying it). So why is there the automatic assumption that people having "child porn" should be jailed?

      Posted anonymous because I do not want to be linked to child porn in any way...

    147. Re:Go electronic! by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      You'll find that christians will most likely happily go to their death before agreeing to an implanted RFID (or similar) chip used to facilitate buying and selling.

      The prophecy quite specifically talks about a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. It would seem that implanting an RFID chip into the left hand should not pose any problem to Christians.

      Game, set, and match.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    148. Re:Go electronic! by noidentity · · Score: 2

      Ordinarily, I'd think about this stuff and feel a sense of dread. But I'll be gone when all this happens. It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess.

      Take a look in the mirror, and you may find you aren't a Christian either.

    149. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because credit cards charge merchants ~2%. I guess if Obama can force everyone to buy health care, we can force merchants to pay the credit card mafia too. Besides, whatever happened to:

      No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;

      But don't worry, you're time is coming greenback. China and Russia have already cut you out of the loop. The end is near.

    150. Re:Go electronic! by taucross · · Score: 1

      Sounds pretty clear to me. You'll find that christians will most likely happily go to their death before agreeing to an implanted RFID (or similar) chip used to facilitate buying and selling.

      Yes, but meanwhile they are happy to wear the mark of greed.

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    151. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ordinarily, I'd think about this stuff and feel a sense of dread. But I'll be gone when all this happens. It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess. ;-)

      As a Christian who thinks that the Left Behind books / movies / movement are an example of the expression "a fool and his money are soon parted", I'm amused by your foolishness.

      Please come back after you've read the actual Bible, not the one which was partially translated from a poorly understood ancient language into the context of the time when King James lived. That one was impacted by the idea that anything ol' Jamie didn't want inside was left out / ignored.

      Google pops this up first, and it seems a reasonable link...
      http://www.biblestudy.org/basicart/what-are-the-errors-in-king-james-version-bible.html

    152. Re: Go electronic! by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Small markets of any type, like farmer or flea markets, have a real problem with accepting anything but cash. I did some weekend business at a regional flea market - 40K people a weekend through it - and I was the only merchant accepting Credit cards. I disliked it too - eating 3% of all CC sales. It must be near impossible for non brick and mortar types to get merchant accounts.

    153. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A chilling thought, that 'one-world religion' is probably Islam - I don't think that Christians have the balls that Muslims do when it comes to taking out non-believers.

    154. Re:Go electronic! by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      These RFIDs can be read at any point-of-sale cash register. No? Give the government a year or so

      Someday, but a year? Not even close. There are plenty of retailers still using pre-broadband POS systems. Eventually they all get swapped out, but a year is optimistic (or pessimistic given your POV) even for the ones that go cutting edge. This stuff moves slowwwwwwwwwwwwly.

      Most of the vendors at the Farmers' market I frequent only take cash, and their cash register is made by Tupperware.
      There is an ATM on the property, and it runs empty almost every weekend.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    155. Re:Go electronic! by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Because my chickens have tattooed circuits on their thighs that outwit counterfeiters. Have you ever seen a rat with a verification tattoo?

    156. Re: Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, you dropped your badge: "troll". Twice.

      Aww, trolls trolling trolls. Isn't that cute?

    157. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      Unless your purpose is illegal, you really have no economically realistic excuse for keeping cash around.

      Here’s a nickel, kid. Go buy yourself a clue.

      Oh wait, that’s cash. It’d probably be illegal.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    158. Re:Go electronic! by gnapster · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, the only reason I can see for downmodding the above was that it did not provide a direct link to Bitcoin. That way, it was marginally less useful than it could have been. Bitcoin is an interesting project, and relevant to the problem of the single point of control/failure that we have with transactions going through Visa et al.

    159. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because your average citizen (think garage sale) shouldn't have to pay for a point-of-sale machine.

      I would be interested to know how these circuits are going to hold up after being folded in some guy's wallet a few hundred thousand times over their lifetime. The article doesn't say, but I'd be surprised if no one has thought to ask that.

    160. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 0

      Can you explain how this equates to a "one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time"? It would seem to me that a much more trivial interpretation would be a law enacted such that no-one can trade with people not bearing the "mark".

      I think it's reasonable to make an attempt to line up today's technology with the prophecy. If you simply passed a law, what's to stop people from circumventing the law? When it says "no one can buy or sell, I read that as no one is able to buy or sell. In other words, it's impossible.

      The prophecy quite specifically talks about a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. It would seem that implanting an RFID chip into the left hand should not pose any problem to Christians.

      I think christians approach this from a different angle. Rather than say that anything in the left hand is ok, I think we say that it's going to be in the right hand (or forehead) because that's what's written there. In other words, you can speculate that somewhere along the way, we might be offered something in the left hand. But I doubt that will happen at all. But this tends to be a touchy subject for most (real) christians, hence the aversion to anything that even remotely looks like the mark.

      There's a lot of debate in christian circles what the meaning of the mark is. Some say it's some sort of tattoo or barcode. Others say that it's purely a spiritual mark and not really something that is manifested here in this world. But I think it would be impossible to control commerce with a purely spiritual mark. So I take a more pragmatic approach. The goal of the antichrist is to flush out the christians so that they can be killed. What better way than to deny us the ability to eat or work or have a place to live? The problem with all this isn't so much the actual mark or participating in the beast financial system. The problem is that you have to swear allegiance to the antichrist. At that point in time, you'll have to make a choice between Jesus and the antichrist. And there will be no middle ground. You're either in our you're out. And being out is really bad news for eternity.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    161. Re:Go electronic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If you simply passed a law, what's to stop people from circumventing the law? When it says "no one can buy or sell, I read that as no one is able to buy or sell.

      You can buy and sell things so long as you can barter with someone. Making the currency electronic and requiring implanted RFID devices to make transactions will make one's life difficult, but it won't close the barter loophole - and, as in any case of regulation, a shadow economy would inevitably arise, with its own currency (likely gold and other precious metals and stones). So you'd still need a law either way.

      As to what's stopping people from circumventing it - why, the fear of punishment, of course.

    162. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but meanwhile they are happy to wear the mark of greed.

      The christian community has the exact same problems that the non-christians have. There's divorce, incest, child molestations, theft, lying, cheating... everything. If you look at the statistics, there's really not much outward difference between christians and non-christians.

      There's a lot of reasons for this. There are huge numbers of people who call themselves christians, but really aren't any different from other people. Maybe they believe. But they don't go to church, and more or less behave like they're not christians. But everyone looks at people like that and says, see? The christians are hypocrites! Is this person really a christian?

      Then there's the christians who really are making an effort to behave in a christ-like manner. But this is spectacularly difficult. So difficult that no one can really do this 100%. So people make their best effort with varying degrees of success. They make mistakes, some small, some big. They recognize what happened, apologize to those affected, repent, and do their best to not repeat the mistake, which sometimes happens and sometimes not. When these people make mistakes, the reaction from non-christians is the same. See?! Hypocrites! Christianity is BS! But what these non-christians should be doing is indicting the person and not the religion.

      Christianity isn't about never sinning again, although that is the goal. In fact, it's safe to assume that never sinning again is impossible. In the end, it doesn't matter who has sinned how much, if this person has sinned more or less than that person who got into heaven or who didn't. In the end, all that matters is faith in jesus. You either have it or you don't.

      To drive the point home, I believe that Jeffery Dahmer is in heaven. This is because he was saved shortly before he was killed in prison. Some people would react with shock and indignation to this. After all, why would someone so awful be allowed into heaven? But christians have a different perspective. If even someone as bad as Jeffery Dahmer can be forgiven, then so can I.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    163. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I believe that Jeffery Dahmer is in heaven. This is because he was saved shortly before he was killed in prison

      You're assuming he actually changed and was actually forgiven - something you won't really know unless you meet him in heaven or hell. There's no faith-o-meter that can tell you beforehand which way someone is going, whether they're just saying the words or they really mean it. If there can be "bad christians", that means there can also be insincere conversions.

    164. Re:Go electronic! by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      Listen up because I'm only going to say this once.

      You obviously don't understand that every electronic transaction costs you an additional fee. Before you start foaming around your pie hole receptacle, understand that someone, somewhere has to pay attention to the electronic transaction, end-to-end, and you will pay them for the privilege of performing that awesome electronic transaction even if you don't pay any banking "fee" on that particular transaction...you are paying somehow. Do you even know that when you pay by credit card that the vendor absorbs the fee? Yep...3% to 4% on every transaction...Visa or MC get $4 per $100 on every single goddamn transaction they process. This is sucking the life-blood out of our planet, and no one seems to care, especially you. If no one used a CC, prices at the store would be cheaper...go ahead, ask any retailer or vendor, they'll tell you...not only that, but they'll also tell you that they aren't supposed to talk about it...YES, that's in the rules that they have to live by to continue to access credit cards.

      Moving on, once you lose the right to carry currency, you lose all of your power of self determination, and as a citizen of your country. Every single penny (or ruble, or peso, or whatever) you take or give will be tracked and traced. The government AND some punk bank will know every person and business with which you conduct business. If you associate with a suspected terrorist, guess who else goes on the watch list...guess who else goes on the no fly list...guess who else gets harassed by police. Guess who will have his wonderful awesome rainbow and puppies bank account turned off. Then try to buy food. Good luck, start begging on a street corner and rest well knowing that you don't have annoying-as-fuck cash in your pocket...which of course means you won't ever get a penny from the generous people walking down the street, because they won't have any to give you, and you sure as hell won't be able to accept visa or mastercard, will you?

      Don't forget, you'll be subject to fucked up laws like transfer limitations, surcharge taxes (get ready for the carbon tax and carbon rationing once cash is gone). They will most certainly have black lists for money transfers, and they'll be ohhh way more accurate than the no-fly list.

      So, besides being loaned your money (credits? the idea of currency and cash would die) at interest, in debt to your Satan-and-friends equivalent to the Federal Reserve, you will also will have the luxury of paying the bankers more...

      Great idea, let's go electronic.

    165. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had laid off the Apple/IIe's we'd still be in paradise!

    166. Re:Go electronic! by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      It's not a government document you tool...it's legal tender. It's PERMITTED by the government to be used to settle a debt. The government doesn't know that you have any particular bill, and they don't know with whom you will trade it.

      If you ever want to do a tax-free off-the-books transaction again in your life, you'll actually STOP using electronic methods of payment.

      Find my other post in this thread about how you'll lose far more than just that and you'll see how myopic your perspective is on the matter.

    167. Re:Go electronic! by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      Wait what? Currency may have it's faults, but it's been a long time since it was feasible to barter for anything. Part of industrialization (and specialization) means that what you produce won't be valuable to everybody. I can't exactly trade some software coding work with the farmer up the highway for some eggs, but I can trade it for some money from a software company and then use that money to buy my eggs. There's no reason to look so far backwards when trying to be "free." It's unfortunate the steps governments have taken these days to get the impression that anything a government can do is automatically restricting to freedom - but realistically speaking, without a small government with a rule of law and protection of property, you *can't* be free. Try bartering anything when the guy with the bigger guns will simply take what he wants. I'll be the first to stand up and say the government has far overstepped its bounds, but claiming there's more freedom in using a Mastercard than a nationally recognized legal tender is asinine.

      Cash transactions are not to avoid reporting income. It's to buy what I want from who I want without anybody snooping into the details, government or otherwise.

      ...and control...snooping, that's a lesser evil...the government won't be the ones processing the transactions, it'll banks...which can turn an account off whenever they want. AND, if you want to take your money to another bank, how does everyone else here think that will happen? (consider for a moment that the bank doesn't like you because the gov't told them you are a terrorist or on a watch-list or something)...I know you understand...it's 99% of everyone else that doesn't have a clue...

    168. Re:Go electronic! by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      It's not a government document you tool...it's legal tender. It's PERMITTED by the government to be used to settle a debt. The government doesn't know that you have any particular bill, and they don't know with whom you will trade it.

      If you ever want to do a tax-free off-the-books transaction again in your life, you'll actually STOP using electronic methods of payment.

      Find my other post in this thread about how you'll lose far more than just that and you'll see how myopic your perspective is on the matter.

      And yet, from TFS,

      "Modern banknotes contain up to 50 anti-counterfeiting features, but adding electronic circuits programmed to confirm the note's authenticity is perhaps the ultimate deterrent, and would also help to simplify banknote tracking." [emphasis mine]

      The day is perhaps not so far off when the federal government can know that you have any particular bill and with whom you have traded it.

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    169. Re:Go electronic! by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      As a christian, stories about tracking purchases are very interesting to me. End-time prophecies say that we'll eventually end up with a one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time.

      Citation needed

    170. Re: Go electronic! by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      No, I'm right,

      No, you are not right, you are a lemming, and you deserve the future you will build for yourself.

      I, and Clone, on the other hand, are not. We don't deserve the future that you and every other ignorant, short-sighted, uneducated, self-involved cows of society are lallygagging us toward. I'm so glad you trust your government, just wait until your trust ends you up at the business end of knight stick, Taser, or bullet marked "City Police".

      Enormous amounts of crime are permitted by the dollar? Are you joking?! We should kill the Internet then, because it supports an even greater amount of crime...what about cars...they permit crimes as well...they should be eliminated too.

      Thanks, we appreciate what you've done for us.

    171. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought i had every right to spend my money as i see fit and noone should know.

      on the other hand, how the *government* spends the money, PUBLIC MONEY, they SHOULD BE FORCED BY LAW to explain in detail how they spend it. transparency and all. if you've been voted by the people then you must inform the people how you spend their money

    172. Re: Go electronic! by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      $100 says you work for the payment card industry, law enforcement, or are contracted to one of them.

      That'll be cash, please.

    173. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right, as we saw last month - go offend the right government, and surprise surprise, suddenly nobody wishes to do credit transactions with you. There has emphatically been no government pressure, and Eurasia has always been at war with Eastasia.

    174. Re: Go electronic! by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I see 'just pay the gift tax' on the money you have paid tax on when you want to give it to someone. You are fucked up

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    175. Re:Go electronic! by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      Government document or not it's recognizable by everyone as valuable from thieves to priests to politicians to scientists, etc. A VISA is only good to a certain amount of people and with it it's a lot easier to track your actions.

      --
      ics
    176. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think it is only in the USA where people do not like paying with cash. In Mexico it *is* the preferred form of payment, mainly because people do not trust in banks *at all*.

       

    177. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we still carry money anyway?

      Because of the actions of Mastercard and VISA?

      To update an old saying:

      First they came for the tourists, but I'm not a tourist so I did nothing.
      Then they came for the journalists, but I'm not a journalist, so I did nothing
      Then they came for me, but there was no one left to save me

    178. Re:Go electronic! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      With cash, the business most certainly has third party charges in a lot of cases - if its a large business (department store) then they more than likely have daily or weekly cash drops and pickups by armoured car rather than someone running down to the bank, then theres the added time for reconciliation of cash registers against receipts, someone has to do that at the end of the day and thats added wages (its instant with EFT, there is nothing to count), most business banking accounts have cash handling charges as well (for payment in and for change supply).

      Don't kid yourself that cash is free for a business, its actually quite costly, and for larger businesses it can be more costly than EFT.

    179. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymity.

    180. Re:Go electronic! by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Do they carry the payment terminal strapped to their thigh?

      or is it a case of buying house "bills" that one can then stuff down the g-string?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    181. Re:Go electronic! by master_p · · Score: 1

      True. How about storing the amounts we want onto a device, and use this device to transfer the value onto another device? wouldn't that work?

    182. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...you want to carry a government document...to prove you're free.

      Technically, the Federal Reserve Note is not a government document. It's a private bank document legislated as legal tender.

    183. Re: Go electronic! by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Fact: The definition of assault includes touching someone with intent to injure them or placing them in reasonable belief that you will do so. Fact: Your threat prior to committing the assault indicated that your assault was an attempt to kill. Fact: You did commit assault, by hitting me with a chair after telling me that you intended to harm me, you just don't know if it was justified. Fact: If it's not justified, assault and assault with intent to kill are illegal. Fact: You gave no justification in line with the definition in the law of the justification for assault when presenting the facts in your defense, so per the facts there is no justification that can be applied.

      The definition of assault is an opinion. They generally read "whoever does X is guilty of Y" or "X shall be unlawful". What facts makes them unlawful? It is nothing more than the opinion of "legislatures" and someone's willingness to use violence to back it up.

      The label of legality/ illegality, or that judgment is an addition to reality, not a description of it.

      As to your distinction of opinion, attitude, and moor; it only makes a quantitative distinction rather than a qualitative one.

      Every modern what? Every modern idiot?

      You're three clicks away from a dictionary. I used the word as a noun. As a noun modern may mean "a man who is currently alive" or "any man who lived in western civilization during the age of modernity (1700-present)"

      There's a difference between the lawkeepers and the lawbreakers, and that's justification.

      Okay, one group came out on top and obtained impunity.This however is accidental to their actions.

      The lawkeepers also try to uphold their responsibility not to make things worse, while the lawbreakers don't give a flying fuck.

      To transferring 9 billion dollars to banks, and starting needless and senseless wars is caring? It's absolutely false as you see in article 2, section 6 of the constitution. Congress is an absolute irresponsible body that may not be held to answer (legal liability) for any official action. Yes the biggest difference comes from the PR scheme. They can't rule be mere force so they need to put on a minimum of appearances to keep people cooperating with them. However don't be fooled, it is just and appearance.

      When a lawkeeper does something bad, it's a big deal to us all, makes a public stink, and we act on it.When a lawbreaker does something bad, the booking officer increments that box on the charge sheet and continues turning the crank with hardly anyone outside the perp, the cops, the court, and the victim ever knowing about it.

      Again, just part of the PR. They'll publicly eat one of their own every now and then to keep up appearances.

      And on top of all of this, I notice you still haven't given a factual and qualitative difference between what law-keepers and lawbreakers do. All that you've talked about is perception, and appearances and opinions and dicta. I'll even be nice and try to help you out.

      To show a factual and qualitative difference between the lawbreaker and law-keeper, you need to point to some fact inherent in any act that is a crime, and absent in those acts which are not crimes. Some fact about the act that holds true irrespective and irregardless of any legal definition or opinion.

    184. Re:Go electronic! by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 2

      As a christian, stories about tracking purchases are very interesting to me. End-time prophecies say that we'll eventually end up with a one-world cashless financial system where the government can approve or deny any transaction in real-time. Say something bad about the government? [snip snip] It's you non-christians who get to deal with that mess. ;-)

      When you talk about profecy, please provide a reference.

      Ah, "one-world cashless financial system" cannot be found in the Bible, you say? Come on, "mark of the Beast" is not coming close to describing cash or tracking devices. The text pretty much describes a *tatoo worn on the forehead*.

      Stop "interpreting" texts by inserting meanings they do not have. That is a big source of man-created wars and strife, which is NOT christian (example: cusades, jihad, Al-Quaeda, inquisition).

      Moreover, a "one-world currency" has existed and been in universal use for daily transactions until quite recently: gold. Do you object using gold?

      --
      You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
    185. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      If you use the same currency (and other stuff) the Government establishes, why the big objection to having to paying the tax? [1]

      I have objections to the manner in which the government spends tax monies. To start with, there's all the corporate welfare Uncle Sam gives the military-industrial complex.

      [1] Reference: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2022:17-21&version=NIV [biblegateway.com]

      Dude, did you just quote the fucking Bible on Slashdot? My only response to that is that unlike Augustus, Gaius Julius Caesar got his rightful due: a knife in the back.

    186. Re:Go electronic! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Contrary to the propaganda pushed by governments and law enforcement, money is paramount to the protection of privacy. Cash is one of the few means available which allows for private and anonymous transactions. This is, of course, why law enforcement goes out of their way to suggest only criminals need cash.

      In short, cash is a corner stone of a free society.

    187. Re: Go electronic! by garwain · · Score: 1

      I couldn't care less who know how much I spend at the strip club. Hell, if the bar took debit or credit cards, I would rather pay electronically. I am lucky to have a 5 in my wallet. Gee, my car broke down, and I needed it have it towed? the garage will pay the driver, and then bill me... The strippers want cash? there's a bank machine right in the bar. MasterCard wants a payment? my pay gets deposited electonically, and is automatically transfered to my line of credit every week. Client wants to pay in dimes? Fark I have to go to the store, get paper to roll them in, then go to the bank because no one else wants change!

    188. Re:Go electronic! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I have objections to the manner in which the government spends tax monies. To start with, there's all the corporate welfare Uncle Sam gives the military-industrial complex.

      The voters share the responsibility.

      --
    189. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Free to use said certificate for debts, public and private. It's a step away from using gold/silver. It's also not traceable. You can buy someone subversive to your government with physical money.

      You know what money is, right?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    190. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      In a perfect world, probable cause is necessary. However just to stop something from happening, there are actions taken that there are known future consequences for. After all, if you've stopped something from happening, what does it matter if your wrist is slapped?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    191. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      The dude was the lead of an espionage ring. Not quite as 1984'ish when it's put into legal terms, is it?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    192. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Then it's a good thing I refuse to vote.

    193. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Again, if it changes hands without a reader/tracer, it's not traced.
      Swap whatever your thinking about into a dark alley drug trade. When it's used at a business, probably. When it's used to pay a private debt, It's not trackable. Not in 2010, at least. I'm sure in the future technology will come when there will be a microscopic implant in the money that is satellite trackable, and slashdot will have articles about people wrapping money in tin-foil, though.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    194. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      No they aren't. Not generally. That legend on the money is a confidence booster, it doesn't confer any special rights on either party.

      Wrong. Just plain wrong.

      Any creditor, BY LAW, must accept ANY legal tender as payment for ANY debt. BY LAW.

      Plenty of situations could be imagined that involve no debt, but “you owe me rent” is clearly a situation that involves debt.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    195. Re:Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you can come up with some hot water somewhere you can do it in the back of a taxi.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    196. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      > I believe that Jeffery Dahmer is in heaven. This is because he was saved shortly before he was killed in prison

      You're assuming he actually changed and was actually forgiven - something you won't really know unless you meet him in heaven or hell. There's no faith-o-meter that can tell you beforehand which way someone is going, whether they're just saying the words or they really mean it. If there can be "bad christians", that means there can also be insincere conversions.

      Of course you're right. There's no way to be sure. But I've seen an interview with the pastor who met him in prison. It was his opinion that his acceptance of christ was sincere. And I have no reason to doubt that.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    197. Re:Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In a perfect world, probable cause is necessary. However just to stop something from happening, there are actions taken that there are known future consequences for.

      This is why, in an imperfect world, accountability is everything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    198. Re:Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The prophecy quite specifically talks about a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. It would seem that implanting an RFID chip into the left hand should not pose any problem to Christians.

      Transcription error. The Bible was originally in video form, but it was transcribed to text because the batteries were running out and nobody had a place to plug the charger in.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    199. Re:Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So why is there the automatic assumption that people having "child porn" should be jailed?

      If you are promoting child pornography then you are part of the problem. The problem is when no child is harmed and the image is innocuous and the cops show up anyway, which is what we're talking about now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    200. Re:Go electronic! by infinite9 · · Score: 2

      You can buy and sell things so long as you can barter with someone. Making the currency electronic and requiring implanted RFID devices to make transactions will make one's life difficult, but it won't close the barter loophole - and, as in any case of regulation, a shadow economy would inevitably arise, with its own currency (likely gold and other precious metals and stones). So you'd still need a law either way.

      Yeah, this is the consensus. That christians will have to find other ways to get what they need. I suspect it will be a lot like nazi germany. There were some non-jewish germans who helped the jews. I think a black market will be a lot harder with a modern surveillance society, but certainly not impossible. The bible clearly says that there will be christians who make it all the way through the tribulation alive. This means 3.5 years on the run. They must be eating something, even if it's been provided supernaturally.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    201. Re:Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Cash transactions are faster to process than credit card or debit card transactions. (I am appalled by the number of people who don't carry any cash around, and thereby hold up the line while their two-dollar coffee purchase is processed.)

      I am appalled by how shitty a payment system some retailers are willing to install. They should be able to place a trivial charge on my card very rapidly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    202. Re: Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      When we truly have global ubiquitous internet then the last non-privacy-related objection vanishes: bank notes work any ol' time.

      However, even our own Supreme Court has recognized that you must have privacy to have all your other rights. That is enough for me. Illegal does not necessarily equal unethical or immoral. Giving a central government more power to monitor and control is only desirable if you want to live a monitored and controlled life.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    203. Re: Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Until they give you the stuff, they don't have to accept cash. If they give you credit, they have to accept a cash payment on the debt. They can probably force you to meet them at the bank to deliver it, though, in cases where the payment is large and there is a significant material risk to transporting it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    204. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      It's not reasonable to do anything with any prophecies. After all, by any Christian standard, anyone that attempts to forsee the future is a heretic. Oh.. unless it's them ;)

      Just nod, ignore, and walk on.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    205. Re: Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I mean illegal now, because ex post facto laws are banned by the Constitution.

      That's not any comfort to those who are imprisoned or killed illegally.

      I don't see any Germans coming for Jews around here,

      They're not coming for the Jews yet. Right now they're coming for people who leak information.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    206. Re: Go electronic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The handgun legislation that existed not-too-long ago in Washington D.C. was banned by the Constitution too, but plenty of people were still forced to obey it or suffer consequences until the Supreme Court got around to striking it down.

      First, that rulling was political horseshit. Future courts will read the Constitution again and realize that Roberts et al were in on the fix, and will reverse it.

      Congratulations on dismissing the issue that "people were still forced to obey it or suffer consequences".

      Second, That's how the law works. Law enforcement is beholden to the laws that are in force, not to your interpretation of the constitution.

      You're funny. Law enforcement is beholden to whoever can fire them. In most cities that's not you. A few cities have a citizen's police review board and in even fewer does it have teeth.

      Too many cops getting shot or shot at for them to have any humor about Republican political manipulations of the 2nd Amendment.

      Too many cops abusing too much power on behalf of the status quo not to get shot at. Too many sick and/or abused people abused by same not to shoot at them.

      So when the ruling is reversed by a future ruling and the law comes back, double jeopardy will protect anyone freed under the current ruling,

      Laws don't protect you any more than cops do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    207. Re: Go electronic! by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Basically, yes.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    208. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      The main reason companies prefer non-cash is because once they have it, it can't be stolen when robbed or sucked out of the register.
      In Mexico, it's just a theft & corruption issue, all together. Bad comparison.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    209. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      OR you could carry cash & card, and just play dumb.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    210. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so above all that voting shit. "Hey, the country's fucked, and that's going to result in me being fucked, but at least I didn't get my hands dirty! I can tell everyone else at the soup kitchen 'I told you so!'"

    211. Re:Go electronic! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      In a democracy[1] if you are eligible to vote, whether you vote or not you still share the responsibility.

      [1] let's not waste time arguing meanings of the word ok? I'm going to assume you are smarter than that.

      --
    212. Re:Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I have an aussie $5, I also have an American $5. They are about as durable, it's not like American money is *actually* paper. It's only a term used, kinda like a lead pencil.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    213. Re: Go electronic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      No, anonymous != illegal.

      Yet.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    214. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      In a democracy[1] if you are eligible to vote, whether you vote or not you still share the responsibility.

      Putting aside argument over the definition of democracy, I reject this premise. As far as I'm concerned, an individual is only responsible for his own actions.

      If I draw a gun and kill somebody, I am responsible for that person's murder because I chose to act in a manner that resulted in that person's death.

      If I order a person under my authority to kill, then I share responsibility for the murder. Even though somebody else pulled the trigger, I gave the order.

      However, if I elect a politician to perform certain functions on my behalf, and that politician decides to ignore the example of history and start a land war in Asia, I have every right to reject responsibility for that politician's actions. I didn't tell him to start a war, he did that on his own, and if he asked me first I would have bitch-slapped him for having the temerity to even think that I would want him to start a war.

    215. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      If nobody voted, then the government would have no claim to legitimacy.

    216. Re:Go electronic! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Not voting doesn't make you less responsible. An individual is also responsible for his inaction when he could act.

      The last I checked G W Bush got elected _twice_. Now if those nonvoters (who make up > 30% of the total) actually voted for "somebody else" and Bush still won, then I wouldn't blame those voters - they did their best to fulfill their responsibilities as voters.

      Lastly, if you only accept responsibility when the politician you vote for does the right thing and not when he/she does the wrong thing then you are no better than "Those Hated CEOs/Bosses/Politicians" who do something rather similar.

      --
    217. Re:Go electronic! by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      I think what TheLink meant was just this : if given a choice between the Good and the Naughty you don't vote, then you actively give me more efficiency in my own voting for the Naughty (of course ;-)
      So, when the Naughty is elected, you are responsible (of not having barred him)...

      --
      Herve S.
    218. Re:Go electronic! by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      An individual is also responsible for his inaction when he could act. The last I checked G W Bush got elected twice.

      We do a reductio ad absurdiam and suggest that I'm responsible for not assassinating the bastard. :)

    219. Re:Go electronic! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Same way I always do; with advice on their technique.

      "Here's a tip: massage the balls more."

    220. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is I'm sure many of us have wanked off to pictures of sexy women who are fully dressed (or somewhat less fully dressed ;) )

      Erm, probably not since I was eight or so - decades later, I'm way too jaded for that now. Since internet porn (and before that, BBS porn) has been available for many years, I suspect that's the most common case.

      - T

    221. Re:Go electronic! by Nyder · · Score: 1

      "You didn't know the pics of your kids in the bathtub is considered child porn" ...
      "I could care less what you have on your computer. Not my business, and your paying me cash to keep it not my business."

      #1 Bathtub pics of kids is almost neveer likely to be consifered child porn

      #2 Are you saying if you see child porn on someone's computer you will look the other way because they are paying you in cash?

      #3 Why don't you accept other forms of payment? Are you trying to avoid paying taxes?

      #1 has happened before
      #2 not sure how hard this is to grasp. I don't care if you like childporn. I don't care if your a religous nut that likes pics of other religous nuts. I don't care if you like dressing up in the other gender clothes and act that way. It's your business, and your not paying me to care, not do anything about it.
      #3 Why don't I accept checks, money orders? Easy to fake/cancel. I don't accept credit/debit cards because I'm not setup for that crap, and honestly, most of you need to learn to live in your means. I take cash, because I can use it easily. As for taxes, that's my business, isn't it? Sort of like the "questionable pics" you have on your computer is your business. If you think it's your business to make sure I pay taxes, then it's my business to make sure you don't have anything illegal on your computer. See how that works?

      And for teh AC that claims I'm a drug supplier. Why would I fix peoples computer and accept weed as a payment, if I was supplying weed to the dealers? Seems to me, I would already have an income, and wouldn't have to deal with the pain of fixing other computers problems.

      Do you think those of us who fixes computers actually enjoy fixing yours? Hell no. The shit sucks and you need to learn better internetting habits.

      For the decades I've been downloading pirated software, cracks, copyrighted material, and what not, you know how many times I've been infected? 3 times. And the first time it was the Stone virus on my XT. (it was so cool, my PC booted up, said it was stoned, and I said, "fuck ya, so am I". Then I realised that only i should of been stoned. lol

      I'm not going into the horror stories of fixing peeps computers, i'm sure, those that have done it, or do it, understand exactly why it's sucks.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    222. Re:Go electronic! by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      ...Using infrastructure paid for by me, kept safe by police paid for by me, and when you're caught - subject to a fair trial with a jury served by me.

      I'm not going to say I agree with government taxation at its current levels, but you can't have a free society without rule of law and protection of property. You can't have prosperous commerce without infrastructure. Skipping out on paying into a society you benefit from doesn't make you a noble hippie stickin' it to the man, it makes you a freeloader.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    223. Re:Go electronic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

  2. "Ultimate" Deterrent? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's hard for me to imagine any security measure economical enough to implement in $20 bills could not be replicated by a really well-funded forger, such as a foreign intelligence agency. If there is any "ultimate" deterrent, it would involve tracking the movement of funds from one individual to another, i.e. marginalizing the use of cash, or making it equivalent to electronic banking, so Big Brother can keep an eye on it.

    1. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      The only "Ultimate" deterrent would be to make it impossible to produce the currency for less than the value of the currency.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      That's what this story is about. The government being able to track the movement of cash. First they will put these electronic circuits in the money so that when someone wants to check if a bill is legitimate they can scan the bill for the electronic code, the scanner will check with the centralized database that the electronic code in the bill is one of the legitimate ones. After these scanners become common, they will be required for all business transactions.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by 31415926535897 · · Score: 1

      It's hard for me to imagine any security measure economical enough to implement in $20 bills could not be replicated by a really well-funded forger, such as a foreign intelligence agency. .

      Inflation.

    4. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by spazdor · · Score: 1

      And that's why everyone hates pennies.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    5. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by MichaelKristopeit321 · · Score: 0
      exactly what i was thinking... there is nothing "ultimate" about an electronic circuit... if anything, forging a logical circuit would be the easiest thing to reliably and exactly duplicate on the note. obviously masks carry significant costs, but no more than commercial printing presses, magnetized and luminescent inks, and various paper stocks.

      also considering the largest threat of counterfeiting comes from foreign governments... particularly those that currently control most of the chip fabrication plants that could duplicate this process on a marginal basis, if anything this is setting up the banks to create their own false sense of security and allow counterfeiting on a much grander scale.

    6. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by vlm · · Score: 1

      The only "Ultimate" deterrent would be to make it impossible to produce the currency for less than the value of the currency.

      As long as the existence of the currency over the lifetime of the physical object generates more tax value by being used, than it cost to make, a govt will run a profit if they own the mint. If it costs $21 to make a $20, thats perfectly OK if the bill is so durable that each 5% sales tax and 30% income tax adds up to $22 of revenue from that physical artifact.

      Also there is no deterrent from a wealthy enough foreign power minting bills just to mess with you. Kind of like you don't need to make a profit on a military battle rifle round for it to be convenient for a country to produce and use it.

      The only ultimate deterrent remains something with a fission core, unfortunately.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish everyone hated pennies. We needed to stop minting those little buggers last decade...

    8. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      That might actually (and finally) make it impossible to hire workers that can only be paid in cash right now - because they can't get a bank account in most places.

      Of course I just direct them to Bank of America that has a special "illegals" program for opening accounts for people that otherwise can't have bank accounts. It is great for drug dealers, undocumented immigrants and thieves looking to launder money. Thanks, BofA, you're a great help.

    9. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      And of course allow the government to know exactly what you do with your money. Although to be perfectly honest, if they do make it impossible to do business without the government tracking your money, I expect to see some kind of unofficial currency appear. I have no idea what form it will take, but some way to conduct business without being traced by the government will be developed. It will be in some good that is easily transportable and can be changed for official currency without attracting attention (at least at first).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    10. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Of course I just direct them to Bank of America that has a special "illegals" program for opening accounts for people that otherwise can't have bank accounts. It is great for drug dealers, undocumented immigrants and thieves looking to launder money. Thanks, BofA, you're a great help.

      That is one well known financial industry equivalent of a honeypot ... There are others.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    11. Re:"Ultimate" Deterrent? by CMYKjunkie · · Score: 1

      The concept, like in passport production with RFID, is to eliminate more of the small-time operations and/or make it "more" difficult for the well funded operations. Obviously, those that are well funded (foreign governments) are very difficult to deter by any means.

  3. What the hell is a banknote? by seepho · · Score: 1

    Now my wallet can use an RFID reader to tell me it doesn't have any money in it? Fantastic.

  4. Goodbye Cash Anonymity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello tracking porn and cigarette purchases. This is the next step in teh "War on Crime."

    1. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by patjhal · · Score: 1

      Buy silver and Gold coins :)

    2. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Sure you could do that... but you might have a problem exchanging them for real goods at most places. No place is obligated to accept legal tender in exchange for goods.

    3. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by mlts · · Score: 1

      The bouillon ownership will be banned like it was pre-1975.

    4. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by operagost · · Score: 1

      Actually, legal tender IS what they're obligated to take. They can take legal tender AT FACE VALUE, or forgive the debt. They don't have to pay the actual value of a silver dollar (about $23 just in bullion right now).

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Lots of places refuse to take certain denominations of currency, and it's fully legal for them to do this (I've checked). They risk annoying a certain percentage of potential customers as a result, but the places that do this get enough business from people that comply with the restrictions that they don't seem to mind alienating what appear to be a minority.

    6. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Actually, legal tender IS what they're obligated to take. They can take legal tender AT FACE VALUE, or forgive the debt.

      No. A sale does not involve debt because it’s a single equal-sided transaction. If they don’t want to take my money, they don’t have to make the transaction. This is well-established legally.

      If a debt exists, they have to accept legal tender, but this does not apply to sales unless they’re selling things on credit (which would be a debt, and they’d have to accept any form of legal tender).

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    7. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bouillon ownership will be banned like it was pre-1975.

      I'll igKnorr that.

    8. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The key phrase is "debt". They can refuse to sell you something in exchange for legal tender. They cannot refuse to accept legal tender for a debt.

    9. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by Stihdjia · · Score: 1

      Why would I need to be anonymous to buy cigarettes? And who the hell pays for porn?

      --
      I see the fnords!
    10. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe all places are required to accept LEGAL tender. It's the barter of "This is a piece of gold, not an authorized representation of value but rather of value inherently"(which is a problem I've always had with the "gold pundits", it's only worth what someone will exchange for it) which is not required, so you can have a gold brick that's 99.95% pure and can be required to pay with legal tender instead.

    11. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I believe all places are required to accept LEGAL tender

      Your belief is incorrect.

    12. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by rhook · · Score: 1

      This is only legal if it is made known before the transaction, once something is rung up a merchant has to accept any legal tender offered.

    13. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by rhook · · Score: 1

      A sale is a debt, once an item is rung up you are indebted to the retailer for the full price of the sale.

    14. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, a merchant has the right to refuse a person's business at any time, and for any reason, so long as the reason does not amount to a human rights violation.

    15. Re:Goodbye Cash Anonymity by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      No, you can always cancel the order and leave. Plenty of people do... “stop... how much is the total? ok, that’s too much... take this and this and this off... now how much...”

      Until you have paid, the item isn’t yours.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
  5. Big brother I see you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will happen of the anonymity of cash?

  6. Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by fnj · · Score: 1

    What could POSSIBLY go wrong?

    1. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by durrr · · Score: 2

      Thives get RFID readers with antennas, check how much you are carrying and only pick high value targets.
      Oh, and no use carrying a "fake" wallet with low bills. They'll scan you just to make sure they got everything once again after you hand over the wallet.

    2. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by LC+Trucido · · Score: 1

      Not with one of these , they won't...

    3. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Good. That gives me time to get out my pistol and kill the thieves. Then I'll take their wallets, turnabout being fair play.

    4. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Maybe a quick toasting in a microwave oven would help. It's probably easier than carrying your cash in tin foil. What else is there? The dollar coin? Maybe they'll soon make $20 or $50 coins.
      Gotta have change for the parking meter...

      The sniffing for high value idea has been used before. I read that some sniffed for wireless MAC strings with an Apple vendor ID as the first half of the address to target places to break into.

    5. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Or, if you're serious, you could try one of these.

    6. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      At close range, getting out a gun is useless. Even Miyomoto Musashi said guns and bows were supreme weapons on the battlefield ... until you're within sword clashing distance. You can't turn fast enough to point the tip of a sword at an attacker; but you can bring the broad side up to block the other sword. Similarly, if you're within stabbing range it's too late to "get out my gun." If you already have a gun pointed at you, it's also well into too late.

      The threat model for carrying a gun is when you notice the attacker outside of the effective range of a knife/sword/jo/nunchaku/fist AND he doesn't have a gun/crossbow. Mind you if he does have a firearm, at range, you have a chance of evading it; if he's within stabbing range though, he's not going to miss. With a gun pointed at your face you're screwed; with a knife, forget the gun and go hand-to-hand. Hand-to-hand because reaching for a knife is also wasting time; you are faced with a weapon now and need to react now. This isn't the movies; you can't pull out a huge knife and start cutting up his leather jacket. There will be no penis contest; he will kill you with his smaller penis-blade while you're unzipping.

    7. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by vlm · · Score: 1

      Much safer to use that type of hardware to upgrade the firmware on a $1 up to $20, then visit the automated checkout lanes.

      Honestly, I sometimes wonder how automated checkout lanes stay in business. Often they dont. But you gotta wonder what kind of stuff appears in their bill receptors.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by operagost · · Score: 1

      I shot you to death somewhere in the middle of the word "close".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'carefully deposited' meaning it will not survive in the wild.

      People do many many many crazy things with bills. Can it go thru a heavy tumble and spin cycle 10 times and still work?

      Will it still work if you smear say drugs over it? Which many people do by rolling them up.

    10. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      turnabout being fair play.

      Killing a mugger is hardly fair play, and frankly if you really think that you're probably more likely to kill your own family out of idiocy or paranoia.

    11. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      My family knows to keep their distance, and I keep my weapon unloaded and locked away at home. Not every gun owner is an ignorant, paranoid redneck.

    12. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Similarly, if you're within stabbing range it's too late to "get out my gun." If you already have a gun pointed at you, it's also well into too late.

      Assuming some thief is scanning the bills in my wallet, why shouldn't I draw and put a bullet through his head while he's fucking around with my wallet and his scanner? His hands are full.

    13. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because he's behind a wall?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Security vulnerabilities printed onto banknotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this should be modded up +5 Insightful

  7. What's the point? by Skidborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All that money won't be worth the paper it's printed on in a few years anyway.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    1. Re:What's the point? by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 1

      Because now it will be, with the gold and electronics built-in.

  8. Wait, what? by gabereiser · · Score: 0

    Wasn't RFID hacked some while back? What makes them think this is unhackable? Counterfeiting will just get more elaborate that's all.... They'll find a way to do the same thing once these are out in the wild...

  9. RFID Money ?! Get your asbestos undies by meerling · · Score: 2

    I wonder if their new banknotes will survive the US money test.

    Assuming it does and gets adopted by countries, it'll be time for the shielded wallets that are RFID proof.
    I figure a flame war will start over this somewhere :)

    Here are just a few of those sites you can get those shielded wallets from for the more paranoid amongst you : )

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/8cdd/
    http://www.idstronghold.com/
    http://www.tamperseal.com/rfid-blocking-leather-wallet-p-332.html
    http://rfidwallet.org/

  10. And then wikileaks would ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    ... publish the secret salt bits added to the hash to sign the note digitally and we will be back to square one.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  11. bitcoin by mestar · · Score: 1

    You should check out Bitcoins. http://www.bitcoin.org/ The mathematics behind it are genius. I wander how long it will take before governments try to shut it down.

    1. Re:bitcoin by RaymondKurzweil · · Score: 1

      Assuming this ever gained momentum: Lovely, so they think they can impose an absolute cap from the outright on Bitcoin currency and not be affected like everyone else by deflation. The ability to increase money supply has proven to be quite necessary (not even bringing in QE2 or the recent BS).. of course if you are convinced that the US is in hyperinflation right now because of some toolbags on Youtube I guess this is an argument not worth having..

      And LOL I guess there is an article on their wiki about this very issue.

      Whatever.

    2. Re:bitcoin by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      A more effective way would be for the NSA to run the client on its server farms for a few days, and amass a controlling interest in the concern ;-p

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:bitcoin by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      If it became necessary to inflate the bitcoin supply, issuing a new series based on the same algorithm would be more than possible, by the looks of it. O'course, calibrating the exchange rate between bitcoin.v.1 and bitcoin.v.2 would be a fun exercise in applied economic theory...

      Or, alternatively, the bitcoins are technically divisible by several places more than is currently supported. Updating the clients for one more decimal place gives you more options.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    4. Re:bitcoin by RaymondKurzweil · · Score: 1

      O'course, calibrating the exchange rate between bitcoin.v.1 and bitcoin.v.2 would be a fun exercise in applied economic theory...

      Or, alternatively, the bitcoins are technically divisible by several places more than is currently supported. Updating the clients for one more decimal place gives you more options.

      So much for decentralizing the money-supply, though.

      I mean, I just enjoy the rhetoric of "central banks are evil and abusive" (which is true to certain extents), and the solution proposed either a) makes things worse b) replaces that problems with a set of new problems, some of which are worse than the original problems. Yea.

    5. Re:bitcoin by vlm · · Score: 1

      You should check out Bitcoins. http://www.bitcoin.org/ The mathematics behind it are genius. I wander how long it will take before governments try to shut it down.

      Its a frozen economy because no one can successfully compete with the cluster guys to make any spendable BC. Eventually everyone will abandon bitcoins because no one will have any but the handful of cluster ops whom will have generated and hoarded all of them, so they can be rich. I have no interest in making some cluster op rich, so I simply will not do so. I made about 200 BC back when the generation difficulty level was like two digits. Last time I checked it practically needed scientific notation to display the difficulty level. Oh, 14484.16236123, thats all.

      BC is an excellent example of how "the cluster operators shall inherit the earth" is not going to work in the real world.

      Its very much like trying to set up a beanie babies economy. Cornering the market and hoarding all the rhinoceros beanie babies in the entire world makes them quite useless as a currency, thus they become more or less worthless instead of uncountably valuable.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:bitcoin by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Have you tried to calculate current inflation with the pre-clinton CPI method? It's consistently a higher rate by 5% or more, and even the pre-clinton method is cheating a little. The main salvation is mechanization which has made just about everything cheaper to produce in absolute terms. (material and labor inputs)

    7. Re:bitcoin by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      That actually is a weakness. The scheme requires that more than 50% of the processing power of the network be legit.

      There are safeguards in place to prevent it from happening by way of private concerns - the concern would be undermining the source of their newly-generated wealth. For a government, though, spending your dollars...

      I don't think so, though. For it to be big enough for the NSA to bother with it, it would have an enormous amount of processing power associated with it.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    8. Re:bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if you just ignore the cluster hoarders and race condition vulnerabilities.

  12. Washing machine defeats security by perpenso · · Score: 2

    And how durable is the circuitry? Abrasion, water, folding, chemicals (ex. laundry soap), etc are usually hazardous to circuitry. Seems like there will be a few false positives, assuming of course they could even manufacture such notes in a cost effective and reliable manner. The US is already having problems printing its own money.

    1. Re:Washing machine defeats security by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      That would likely be why they want to deposit so many of them--so that if they wear or wash off, there will still be enough of 'em to work.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Washing machine defeats security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I thought when I read this.
      Will it last and is it worth the trouble?

      I see some pretty crummy cash sometimes and I have a hard time believing the electronics layer would last more than a month or two under normal wallet/pocket/g-string conditions.

      Maybe it would work better if they only have the new tech on $20s and up?

      And then there is privacy and security to consider.. Wouldnt cops or criminals use it to detect caches of cash from a few meters away?

    3. Re:Washing machine defeats security by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      Given the trend in valuation of US currency over the last five years, I am pretty sure that the US has had absolutely no problem printing money on a whim lately.

      Whether we are talking about the same thing or not is an exercise for the moderators :)

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    4. Re:Washing machine defeats security by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      I can just see the ads now: "Just one dip in this tub of electro-clean and all the transistors are completely gone!"

    5. Re:Washing machine defeats security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget stripper juice. I end up with a lot of that on my ones.....

    6. Re:Washing machine defeats security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget stripper juice. I end up with a lot of that on my ones.....

      Wow, I never expected strippers to be reading slashdot.

    7. Re:Washing machine defeats security by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      assuming of course they could even manufacture such notes in a cost effective and reliable manner. The US is already having problems printing its own money.

      Send the job to China.

  13. That's okay by itsownreward · · Score: 2

    This is nothing a few seconds in the microwave won't fix.

    Of course, I had to use a hammer to fix my passport's problem.

    1. Re:That's okay by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Yup... but then places could easily refuse to accept it... just as some places right now already refuse to take 50 or 100 dollar bills because they fear counterfeiting issues. You would have to take an extra trip to the bank to exchange it for something that the business would take, or else do business elsewhere.

    2. Re:That's okay by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      This bill is legal tender for all debts public and private. That does not of course mean you can use it as currency.

    3. Re:That's okay by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      50 and 100 dollar bills are not the norm. A customer can still pay with $5, $10 and $20 bills. If the failure rate of the circuits reaches say 50% then a store who insists on electronic verification is effectively refusing cash. No one is going to search through their wallets for bills that "work".

      How many businesses are going to pay for a system that fails a significant amount of the time? There are simpler methods that are much more accurate.

      All a counterfeiter has to do is say the circuit failed, as will happen often, and the system is defeated. Banks will have to accept 'failed' bills because the circuit is not 100% reliable. Every 'failed' bill will have to be destroyed thereby increasing the number of bills that need to be replaced and increasing the cost to the government. All current currency verification method used by banks are 100% accurate. A circuit that could 'fail' due to normal use is not accurate enough.

      Further on the issue of cost. How much will it cost to print these new bills?

      Sure, like many other 'good ideas', it can be done but the question is how economically viable is it.

    4. Re:That's okay by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I love when I see a sign that says:
      "We do not accept 100 dollar bills."

      But, what if I bought 99 dollars worth of pizza?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:That's okay by mark-t · · Score: 1
      If it fails frequently enough, obviously it won't be relied upon... but if it is demonstrably reliable in 99% of the cases, then the 1% of business loss probably won't matter to a lot of people in exchange for the expedience of being able to verify a larger bill.

      Secondly, it's not just a single mechanism that distinguishes a counterfeit from a real bill... banks would be better equipped than retailers to be able to tell if a bill was fake. A counterfeiter claiming the electronics had failed would have to also bypass all of the other security features that are part of the bill... and in practice, banks are not generally fooled by counterfeit bills even though no electronic identification whatsoever is used. It's the small businesses where that's mostly an issue, not at banks or other places that deal in *very* large quantities of cash.

    6. Re:That's okay by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The wording on the banknote means exactly what it says. That it is legal tender for all DEBTS, public and private. Buying something with cash does not involve a debt. You simply don't receive your item until you have paid for it. No debt was ever incurred.

    7. Re:That's okay by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That doesn't matter. I've seen it happen. I once saw person had a large take-out order that was over a hundred dollars, and the place would not take a $100 bill that was presented as part of his payment. He was annoyed as hell and said he wasn't coming back. The manager didn't seem phased by his remarks at all... she simply apologized, stating that the policy was firm and that they would not make exceptions.

    8. Re:That's okay by clodney · · Score: 1

      50 and 100 dollar bills are not the norm. A customer can still pay with $5, $10 and $20 bills. If the failure rate of the circuits reaches say 50% then a store who insists on electronic verification is effectively refusing cash. No one is going to search through their wallets for bills that "work".

      I wouldn't be so sure about that. In the US we are very cavalier about cash, and that will be difficult to change I admit. But a few years ago I was in Cambodia, where the US dollar is a semi-official currency. The really interesting thing was that Cambodian merchants will not accept paper money that is torn, crumpled, or badly worn. I don't know how the practice came about in Cambodia, but I saw merchants turn away bills that were quite ordinary by US standards.

      I suspect it comes down to the difficulty a merchant will have spending/depositing the bill. In the US the federal reserve system automatically replaces worn banknotes when they reach a member bank, and the instance of counterfeiting is low enough that merchants don't put a lot of effort into detecting fakes. But if they start getting burned I would expect them to be far more aggressive, and could easily insist on bills that pass whatever electronic verification is available.

    9. Re:That's okay by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      Yes, as I said, currency. We don't have one.

    10. Re:That's okay by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Sounds like this place needs to invest in a better drop safe.

    11. Re:That's okay by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the problem is with it as a currency... If I owe you money you are obliged to take it in greenbacks. If we are engaging in a transaction and one of us don't want to deal with cash dollars, there is nothing forcing us to, we can simply walk away. The same should be true with any form of currency. I do find it extremely disturbing that there are more places popping up where I can't use cash dollars (IE: airline food). If this trend continues - you're right, we have a problem.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    12. Re:That's okay by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Yes, as I said, currency. We don't have one.

      It's all paper for paper unfortunately.

    13. Re:That's okay by rhook · · Score: 2

      Every transaction involves debt. The definition of the word even says so. When you buy something you owe a debt to the retailer when they agree to the transaction.

      "Something owed, such as money, goods, or services."

    14. Re:That's okay by petman · · Score: 1

      This goes back to the origin of currency, which is an an intermediary in place of barter trade. For example, imagine that you're a farmer and you have some wheat that you want to exchange for meat. Somebody, let's say he's a fishmonger, comes up to you and say he wants some wheat, but he doesn't have meat to give to you. Since you don't want the fish that he's offering, he gives you instead a piece of paper stating the worth of the wheat he's taking, and that now he owes you the value of that much wheat. Then you take that piece of paper to a butcher and offers it in exchange for some meat. The piece of paper, in itself, has no value, but the butcher then keep it and later go back to the fishmonger and says to him, 'Here's the note you gave to that farmer. You can have it back in exchange for some fish."

      So, in essence, cash transactions are in fact debt transactions, since the seller does not receive anything in exchange for what he parts with. All he receives in return is a note that he can later use to redeem for an item that he wants from another seller.

    15. Re:That's okay by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Right, although what if your rental lease is not a "debt" and next month's rent they want ... well, we're not taking cash. Oh, you don't have a bank account? You just cash checks at Wal-Mart? Well, we're evicting you.... That'll get rid of the well-funded rabble. (some people are just poor enough that they keep hitting bank fees that start killing them)

    16. Re:That's okay by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Your rental agreement should outline what forms of payment are accepted in advance...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    17. Re:That's okay by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It should. However, they are wholly allowed to only accept payment by a major credit card. My insurance company will take my pay from a check or bank account + routing number, but I need to put down a major credit card as well.

  14. Convenience in some situations by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Part of the problem, particularly in the US, is there isn't a good person-to-person electronic payment system that is easy to use, secure, and low cost. So let's say you pay for lunch on your credit card, how do I pay you back? Paypal requires we both have accounts, go to a computer, transfer, incur a fee, wait, and so on. Unless you happen to be a business owner you yourself don't accept credit cards. So cash is the only easy way.

    Can also apply to businesses. Like when I had a local plumber come out to fix a broken faucet. They would take a credit card, of course, they have to in this day and age, but they didn't want to pay the retardedly expensive fees to have a full on wireless, battery powered, unit in their trucks. So I would have had to call their office and give them the number, they run the card, call back the plumber and tell him "It's good write him a receipt." Or, I could do what I did, get some cash and just pay him on the spot.

    We need a some more advances in electronic currency before it'll be feasible to not need paper anymore.

    1. Re:Convenience in some situations by metrix007 · · Score: 2

      I've always thought this was ridiculous. In the rest of thje developed world I can send to another persons bank account any amount for free. It may take a few business days, but absolutely no need for paypal.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    2. Re:Convenience in some situations by lonelytrail · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Convenience in some situations by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      We have that too, it’s called “personal check”... though it does have the drawback of requiring you to trust that they actually have that much money in the account, and the check clears.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    4. Re:Convenience in some situations by AltairDusk · · Score: 2

      It's always good to have paper as an option. I suspect the real driving force behind this idea if it is implemented will be from government agencies wanting an effective tracking system for cash. God forbid we pay the neighbor's kid to mow the lawn without the government knowing about it.

    5. Re:Convenience in some situations by omnichad · · Score: 1

      ditto. I got it for business, but I use it for personal transactions too. It's so convenient to just pull out an iPod and swipe a credit card wherever I am (that also happens to have wireless internet).

    6. Re:Convenience in some situations by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 3, Funny

      Paper? What sort of backward state still uses paper banknotes? :-)
      In Australia plastic or 'polymer' notes last longer and are harder to forge.

    7. Re:Convenience in some situations by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      American banknotes aren't made of out literal "paper", either - it's actually a cotton "paper" that ensures it lasts a reasonable amount of time.

      That said, we in Australia aren't half so attached to our money as somehow symbolising the nation, and are quite willing to embrace change.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    8. Re:Convenience in some situations by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Which means you don't have it, sense you can't do it easily electronically.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    9. Re:Convenience in some situations by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      I do HAVC/R. If their check doesn't clear, I know where the hell they live.

    10. Re:Convenience in some situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's say you pay for lunch on your credit card, how do I pay you back? Paypal requires we both have accounts, go to a computer, transfer, incur a fee, wait, and so on. ...

      If you have a positive balance in your PayPal account and make a "Personal" payment, then the payment is deducted from your balance and there is no fee.

    11. Re:Convenience in some situations by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      I can't believe the ignorance amongst the slashdot community...

      Ok, maybe I can, but listen...once you lose your right to use currency, you lose your right to everyone. Everything will be owned by someone who is not you. If you can find my other post in this thread, you'll have an insight as to why going purely electronic is the worst possible thing for you.

      Learn something before you go off on a subject about which you know nothing.

    12. Re:Convenience in some situations by EdZ · · Score: 1

      It may take a few business days

      Here in the UK at least, most banks have switched from BACS to FPS. Most transfers go through within two hours, and I've had some complete within seconds.

    13. Re:Convenience in some situations by hitmark · · Score: 1

      was there not a iphone payment terminal solution presented recently? Basically a small magnetic strip reader that one plugged into the headphone jack, and a program that turned the "noise" into credit card data?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    14. Re:Convenience in some situations by MooseQuest · · Score: 1

      I do find that some small businesses are notorious for stating "No Credit Card Transactions Under $10" which is a violation according to the Credit Card Authorization Companies. I've actually not been able to buy gas at a Gas Station (cough::Sunoco::cough) and called it in to my card issuer. Their policy is that they will either fine or not allow that site to use their services. There are payment devices like Square that up and coming that will bridge the gap for person-to-person transactions but they will always carry fees. The only way I've seen it to be fee-less is when two people have the same Bank, they can do wire transfers for free between their accounts. I always try to use my card for payment. I find the security and trust in using electronic funds, far better than when I have cash. Ultimately I have a link back to the transaction and can either pull the funds back if I'm not satisfied with my purchase, or automate payment for monthly bills.

    15. Re:Convenience in some situations by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      I could do it electronically – but getting their bank’s routing number and account number is unwieldy, and PayPal is still not terribly convenient since I’d have to sit down at my computer and they might not want to be paid with PayPal anyway.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    16. Re:Convenience in some situations by ashidosan · · Score: 1

      Ah, delicious irony...

      All the GP said was that Australians aren't so attached to their money as to resist changes to it. As in, the polymer bills mentioned in the post the GP was replying to?

      Work on reading comprehension before you go off all half-cocked.

    17. Re:Convenience in some situations by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      In Canada we have the one and two dollar coins. We are thinking of abandoning the penny.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  15. "simplification" ??? by l2718 · · Score: 2
    Do we really want to

    ... simplify banknote tracking.

    At the moment, cash is basically the only (mostly) anonymous means of payment available. Since when is less anonymous is a good idea?

    1. Re:"simplification" ??? by zero_out · · Score: 1

      Do we really want to

      ... simplify banknote tracking.

      At the moment, cash is basically the only (mostly) anonymous means of payment available. Since when is less anonymous is a good idea?

      When you're a government agency, or corporation. Remember, corporations control the (U.S.) government, and the government controls the money. Sure, any group can create its own form of currency, and some communities/municipalities have done just that. Just try to exchange that local currency for anything outside of town, however, and it all falls apart.

    2. Re:"simplification" ??? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Do we really want to

      ... simplify banknote tracking.

      At the moment, cash is basically the only (mostly) anonymous means of payment available. Since when is less anonymous is a good idea?

      Since we decided that this whole freedom thing that those hippies who founded this nation so adored was over rated. And then we decided to try out a fascist police state and corporate kleptocracy run by a class of people who have the right to be given more money, not for work, but because they already have a lot of money.

  16. Where's George? by snookerhog · · Score: 2
    what was wrong with using where's george to track the usage of bills?

    seriously though, once cash is traceable, it ceases to be useful. unless they only use it on very large bills and they reinstate the higher denomination bills

  17. Anti-counterfeiting prior art by srussia · · Score: 1

    Archimedes' principle. The Fisch implementation is pretty good.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  18. Why not just use Polymer notes? by metrix007 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They were developed by the Aussie government in the 80's, and they are basically impossible to counterfeit. They are also waterproof, near indestructible etc.
    Poorer countries such as Nicaragua, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Kuwait use them, so why have other countries not caught up?

    This isn't just the US, but the EU and UK as well. Why stick to paper when much more advanced tech has been around for over 20 years and is being used by third world countries?

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    1. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK doesn't use paper notes. We use cotton and linen rag instead. Probably the same for US since paper deteriorates quickly in the pocket.

    2. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The US, apparently, doesn't want to licence the technology.

      But yeah, I've got a $5 AU bill from my first trip there in 2004. It's a mid 1990 series. Excellent condition for a bill. It's hard to find a 2006 series $1 US in as good condition as that fiver.

    3. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by glwtta · · Score: 2

      UK doesn't use paper notes. We use cotton and linen rag instead.

      Those are also called paper - if it's made out of pressed fibers, it's paper. And, indeed, apparently bank notes are usually made of cotton paper.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      >Poorer countries such as Nicaragua, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Kuwait use them,

      Yes, but you neglect to mention that Nigeria and Bangladesh have only 10 approx. $10,000US-equivalent notes in circulation, and Nicaragua has only one of them, which constitutes its entire national reserve and is now, due to some unfortunate incidents including the intervention of a CIA stripp-- er, agent-- in the hands of a drug cartel-- in Mexico. Kuwait, finally, is *not* a poorer nation, but considers oil to be a more effective day-to-day currency.

    5. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Because certain segments of the government understand that paper money is based on an illusion (although the illusion of value doesn't mean they're valueless, just that it's a value held in an illusion and not in your hand) and if you change it too much too fast people start to beleive the haze is falling away from their eyes, which can have destabilizing effects as they start to refuse the paper money, stripping away its ability to carry the value it actually has.

      (This isn't the problem pennies have. The problem pennies have is that it costs more to process them than having them is worth.)

    6. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by vlm · · Score: 0

      Inks smear right off. The solution is to laminate, then it turns out they delaminate. The solution to that is to essentially plastic weld two thin layers together into one piece of clear plastic. Then they're thick enough to crack. They're not as indestructible as you claim. Sure, not as bad as a supermarket plastic bag, but...

      The type of deterioration of plastic objects including banknotes experience does not quite fit in with the financial industries handling procedures for dealing with deteriorating paper money. Its not just a question of new squeegee rollers, its like whole new design concepts for storing, stacking and shipping bundles of "cash".

      The capital costs of replacing all currency handling machinery in the country would be high, essentially a big ole wealth transfer to China whom would make it all...

      Its all possible, and eventually it might make financial sense. It already has for several countries. However, we'll probably convert to poly right about the time we convert to metric.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply put - tradition

      There is feel of a "green back" that is familiar to everyone, and looked up to by other countries. Besides, it isn't paper, it's cotton.

    8. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      I find your faith in 150 year old paper technology disturbing.

    9. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by muphin · · Score: 2

      they actually did a trial run in the US using 'our' notes, the polymer ones, AKA Securency.
      a huge portion of people using the notes didn't like the way they felt, therefore the stopped using them. it wasn't because there were sturdier and easier to distinguish (colour coded)
      Americans are very stubborn and slow to take things up, so don't expect too many changed with their currency, i bet they would invest billions in making their money feel the same but change everything else, great 'money management' there.

      sexy information and the trusted wikipedia

      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    10. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Kozz · · Score: 2

      Why stick to paper when much more advanced tech has been around for over 20 years and is being used by third world countries?

      It seems to me that, provided the "old" currency formats continue to be acceptable payment (think twenty-year-old $20 USD bill), why bother counterfeiting the new styles? Just continue to counterfeit the older style bills.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    11. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have look at using polymer notes but so far none can pass the tests the US does for its money. Seriously, the cloth/paper/whateveritis is a hell of a lot tougher and more flexible than you think, better than any polymer note in existence (so far).

    12. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by dakameleon · · Score: 2

      eh? I've never had ink smearing off my Australian banknotes, no matter how new or old. It's as flexible and as thin as paper, and far less tear-prone. I haven't had a bank note "deteriorate" on me, and the oldest ones I've seen have the same kind of fading you might see on a paper note. It even has a translucent "window" as a security device, or so they tell us. They're damnably hard to counterfiet, though we shouldn't be under the illusion that it would be impossble.

      Australia replaced its whole active money supply by 1996, and other countries have followed suit. Yes, the US money in criculation is huge, far more so than the Australian or other currencies which have gone down the same path. The average note in circulation lasts about 2 years, and polymer notes last more like 5 years, so you're going to end up saving money in the long run, pun not intended. No-one is saying throw the baby out with the bathwater - just as there are newer designs of notes, newer materials can be introduced alongside the old ones; it's just the US is so hidebound in its attachment to the form of money as it is today in some mistaken veneration of its symbolism, as though money has never changed its design in the past, that it is unlikely that such an action would be possible in the short term.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    13. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kuwait is a poor country?

    14. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by willy_me · · Score: 1

      When these bills are found they can easily be taken out of service. Retailers drop the cash off at a bank and the bank replaces the old bills with new ones from the government. The next step is to get retailers to simply not accept those bills - something they do willingly. Those who have the old bills are forced to bring them to a bank where they are properly checked before being accepted. Right now $100 CND bills are all but useless in Canada because of counterfeit bills. New "counterfeit-proof" bills are released and the cycle repeats.

    15. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by metrix007 · · Score: 2

      Inks smear right off. The solution is to laminate, then it turns out they delaminate. The solution to that is to essentially plastic weld two thin layers together into one piece of clear plastic. Then they're thick enough to crack. They're not as indestructible as you claim.

      This is pure BS. I have notes from over 10 years ago that are still in ace condition. You have no idea of that which you speak.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    16. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Errr, no. Not by a longshot.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    17. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kuwait is a poor country? since when

    18. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Typically when you change the banknotes, you gradually phase out the old ones - first they are legal tender, then they can be accepted or not at merchant's discretion, then they can only be exchanged at a bank, and finally they're just paper.

    19. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I keep asking the same question, but it's not just about materials, it's about the design in general. I've been in a few countries, and American dollar banknotes are the worst design that I've seen - unnecessarily large, and practically impossible to tell apart when in the wallet because of having same size and color. Someone still can't get over the silly "monopoly money" joke, or what?

    20. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inks smear right off. The solution is to laminate, then it turns out they delaminate. The solution to that is to essentially plastic weld two thin layers together into one piece of clear plastic. Then they're thick enough to crack. They're not as indestructible as you claim. Sure, not as bad as a supermarket plastic bag, but...

      Huh? I've retrieved Australian notes which have remained for months in flood waters and they were fine. I've had notes which have been left in vehicles in the hot sun in the middle of the damn outback and they were fine. You're talking out of your ass.

    21. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they don't want to pay the license fee.

      Not kidding. It's patented tech, and they don't want to pay for it. That's all it really boils down to.

    22. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that, provided the "old" currency formats continue to be acceptable payment (think twenty-year-old $20 USD bill), why bother counterfeiting the new styles? Just continue to counterfeit the older style bills.

      it's been a bit over 15 years since the polymer notes were introduced into Oz, seeing a paper note, genuine or not is a rarity. For the most part they are part of someone's collection and not in general circulation.

      The US mint cycles notes does it not, every 2 years or so? How long would it take to get the old notes out of circulation enough to make forgeries too difficult to pass off. In OZ, this happened over about 5 or 6 years. Banks basically refused to hand out new paper notes after the introduction of polymer notes. Paper notes became instantly suspect after a short time.

      The Greenback has serious problems, ignoring the ergonomic ones (they are the same colour and size, if you're blind or blind drunk you cant tell the difference between a 1 and 100 USD note, the diff between a lobster (bright red A$20 note) and Pineapple (bright yellow A$50 note) is readily apparent) they are too easily forged, thus making them the worlds most forged currency. Exchanging USD in other nations becomes a problem, there are entire batches of US$ 100 notes that wont be accepted, some exchangers will reject notes because they've been folded. However with my polymer Aussie notes as well as polymer Malaysian and Euro notes I've never had so much as a second look at them.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      This is so true; I think in Africa you can pay via your cellphone - it virtually ends robbery and the violence attached to carrying money in poor countries. It can also curtail corruption. I submit that corruption is the last inefficiency of society, and we should expect real gains in living standards if we can reduce corruption.

    24. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by ksd1337 · · Score: 2

      Why stick to paper when much more advanced tech has been around for over 20 years and is being used by third world countries?

      Crane and Co., the paper supplier to the US gov't for its paper money, hires lobbyists. It's the reason we don't use polymer banknotes. It's also the reason that we haven't replaced all our $1 banknotes with coins.

    25. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my elbonian bank notes are printed on rattan you insensitive clod!

    26. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by duracelllll · · Score: 1

      finally, someone said the correct answer. Not only that, the reason you still have completely useless 1c pieces is because of zinc lobbyists... I mean, they cost more to make than they are worth!!!

    27. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      'Cos then there would be no excuse for inserting tracking circuitry when that tech would finally be ready? And now it's ready. ;)

    28. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada's new notes, starting circulation next year, will be polymer. Smart move, eh?

    29. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by artbristol · · Score: 1

      It's political. The EU would have used polymer notes when introducing the Euro, but they were lobbied by their existing (paper) banknote manufacturers.

    30. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      They never become 'just paper', currencies aren't normally deprecated that way, there are too many places where it would cause people to lose faith in the currency. I've lived through 2 bills going to coins here in Canada, you can still spend an old $1 or $2 bill if you want, but you pretty much never see them since as soon as they get to a bank they're no longer in circulation, plus at least the $1 bills remaining are probably worth a bit more than $1 now. If a large quantity suddenly showed up in a small area it probably wouldn't be too hard to track down who they came from.

    31. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by Arcorn · · Score: 0

      It was actually 22 years ago and the only paper notes that I've seen are ones my mum kept. They aren't indestructible but they are damn well near it, the older notes, ones over 5 years at LEAST are the only ones that you'll find with tears in them. It also makes it easy to work out which note is which without too much effort and they are difficult to counterfeit.

      I also don't know where you got the nicknames for the notes but no-one in NSW calls them that

    32. Re:Why not just use Polymer notes? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      It was actually 22 years ago

      It's been 22 years since the commemorative first note was issued. They did not go into general circulation until 1992, 17 years ago.

      They aren't indestructible but they are damn well near it,

      Not sure if you're talking about the old paper notes or the polymer ones, but if you manage to tear a polymer note which are very hard to tear, it will tear in half unless you're careful with it. As a side effect, you'll see a few $5's with celo-tape around them to prevent further tearing.

      I also don't know where you got the nicknames for the notes

      Those nicknames are older then the polymer notes sunny Jim.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  19. Or ... it could be a method to track us by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Privacy is the opposite of Security.

    Good is the opposite of Evil.

    Thought crime is when you admit that having Three Wars of Foreign Adventure against Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan when al-Qaeda isn't in any of those three countries and hasn't been in any of them for five years ... is a bad idea.

    Did anyone else watch the cool Castle episode where the Burlesque club owner led a gang of counterfeiters?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Or ... it could be a method to track us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what your saying is you joined the military, put obama in jail and had a fair trial while the rest of the REAL MEN kept our country safe?

      Nice

  20. Yes by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    ...but adding electronic circuits programmed to confirm the note's authenticity is perhaps the ultimate deterrent...

    Because everyone knows it's impossible to spoof electronics.

    1. Re:Yes by Minwee · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure that nobody would ever consider that there are about a hundred individual circuits in each newly minted bill, but that a counterfeit note would need only a few of those to pass as genuine.

    2. Re:Yes by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Putting the word "perhaps" in the news makes the article a spoof off journalism.

    3. Re:Yes by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

      ...a counterfeit note would need only a few of those to pass as genuine.

      And what about a genuine bill that has its circuits fried?

      God knows, I've washed and dried my share of bank notes.

  21. The better to fleece your with, my dear, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I have an RFID reader, will I be able to tell how much cash the mark is holding?

    1. Re:The better to fleece your with, my dear, by vlm · · Score: 1

      If I have an RFID reader, will I be able to tell how much cash the mark is holding?

      There are explosive ramifications w/ regards to IED construction (awful pun, sorry), much like the probably proverbial "american passport RFID proximity detonator" for artillery shells.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  22. Wear & Tear? by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

    What happens when the note has been exchanged continuously from person to person for several years? The note will start to wear. How will those circuits hold up? I don't want to be arrested for suspected counterfeiting because the circuits in the note happened to fail while it was in my wallet.

  23. So... by xclr8r · · Score: 1

    When you bring this note back in after 25-30 years and they sorry the note doesn't check out.

    1. You just lost money.
    2. You look like a criminal.
    3. Bank profits as usual.

    --
    Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
  24. Read more? by gellern · · Score: 1

    The author didn't included the ending paragraph of the article, which is: Although the researchers have yet to work out how the organic electronics could be harnessed as an anti-counterfeit measure [hey, but this stuff is really cool], the circuits are able to perform simple computing operations [yes, they have etched a perfect circuit board that looks like a $20 bill].

  25. Zimbabwe solved the counterfeiting problem... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Noone tries to counterfeit Zimbabwean dollars anymore, because counterfeit money would actually be more valuable than real ZWD...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Zimbabwe solved the counterfeiting problem... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Noone tries to counterfeit Zimbabwean dollars anymore, because counterfeit money would actually be more valuable than real ZWD.

      Hey at the rate the US is going, the same technique will soon solve all of their counterfeiting problems.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  26. I prefer cash because by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    I do not like to have all of my transactions tracked, analyzed, scrutinized, questioned, etc... Also, electric transactions do not work in the vast majority of the world, money does.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  27. tracking people who use cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they can create a trail on people who use cash to avoid being traced. Think of this:
    Pay cash for a cell phone? They can trace it back to you.
    Money laundering? "So how did Mr Addict's money get back to you?
    Got cash from an ATM? Wow, all your bills are belong to us.
    Damaged bank note? No good, probably a forgery (wink wink)
    Moving cash across country borders? You'll light up like a X-mas tree
    Giving cash to a friend who's in trouble with the law? Good luck
    Using a stash of stockpiled older bills? Now suspicious
    Buying fast food? How long until a reader in the cash tray triggers recordings of the security cameras (etc etc)

    This is an escalation, not the end of the battle, IMHO. And yes, anonymous payment does "suddenly become an issue" where it wasn't before. People need to be able to pay for small things (taxi/transport, food, clothing, communications) as well as larger things (transportation, shelter, communications) anonymously.

    Ask your friends and family what they think. Start a dialog. Listen. Do what you want to do right now. If you will still be able to do what you want in the future, well that partly depends on you.

  28. Impossible? by pz · · Score: 1

    ... but adding electronic circuits programmed to confirm the note's authenticity is perhaps the ultimate deterrent, ...

    Right. Of course. Electronic stuff has never, ever been counterfeited. "Ultimate deterrent" is, I suspect, a hyperbole here deserving of a Princess Bride style rebuke.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Impossible? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Sure, you could counterfit it, I'm sure.

      You just couldn't use it, because the real money would be tracked. A 'not real' bill shows up on the system that isn't in the database, or a duplicate real bill shows up 100 miles away from the last time it was used, 5 minutes prior, and the alarm goes off.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  29. Re:RFID Money ?! Get your asbestos undies by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the famous crush test, which is why we use color-shifting dyes instead of holograms. You know why they have that test? So that agents can swallow a large amount of US currency in special capsules, carry it across borders undetected, crap it out, and have it still be in good enough condition pay off informants.

    At least, that's my theory. And why I doubt they'll ever use a method that would reveal the amount of hidden currency you're carrying that they can't themselves defeat (if the circuitry survives the crush test, somehow the capsule will shield it without tripping metal detectors).

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  30. Remember the last time Japan and Germany teamed up by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 0

    They were working to put the world under the control of police states then too.

  31. Anonymous transactions are called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traceless transfers. The IRS and banks hate them. Where would the black market be without cash?

    1. Re:Anonymous transactions are called by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Where would the black market be without cash?

      Barter? There will always be commodities that many or most people will be willing to accept as exchange. At various times and in various different places alcohol, cigarettes, gold, silver, diamonds, drugs, weapons and all sorts of other things have served as "money" for black market transactions. Cash makes things more convenient, but the black market would function almost just as well without it.

  32. Gold? by Mephistophocles · · Score: 1

    A team of German and Japanese researchers created arrays of thin-film transistors (TFTs) by carefully depositing gold, aluminum oxide and organic molecules directly onto the notes through a patterned mask...

    Well I'll be damned - if they have gold in them now this little bit of otherwise worthless paper actually has a minuscule bit of value...

    --
    Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    1. Re:Gold? by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      if they have gold in them now this little bit of otherwise worthless paper actually has a minuscule bit of value

      I’ve heard they already contain measurable levels of cocaine.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    2. Re:Gold? by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      if they have gold in them now this little bit of otherwise worthless paper actually has a minuscule bit of value

      I’ve heard they already contain measurable levels of cocaine.

      Gold and cocaine on the same bill? Well then all the US government has to do is just print nothing but $1 bills for the next 10 years or so. If the actual value of the bill is worth more than US $1 currently is now, they'll be out of that recession in no time!

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  33. And their durability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is irrlevant given the likely uninteded hyperinflation that will artise out of the intended inflation (to reduce the US debt to the world - you suckers bought all that paper from us, soon it will be worth less than shit, ha haa haaa, haaaa)

  34. static discharge by confused+one · · Score: 1

    If I accidentally zap it with a static electric discharge, is it now worthless?

    1. Re:static discharge by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      If I accidentally zap it with a static electric discharge, is it now worthless?

      Yes, but these days it's worthless if you DON'T zap it.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:static discharge by brendank310 · · Score: 1

      It's reasonable to assume that some type of ESD protection would be built in. The first thing that popped in my head was the old EMP scenario from the movies.

    3. Re:static discharge by confused+one · · Score: 1

      ESD protection implies either a transorb or a spark gap type device. Neither were mentioned (yes, yes, it's early in the tech's development). Since the circuit is effectively on the surface of the bill where it would be damn difficult to protect, I don't see that happening.

  35. More expensive ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the notes would cost more to make than they are worth, or soon will be worth.

  36. Probably too delicate... by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Paper money can be scrunched up, rubbed against other paper and much more. I doubt this TFT thingamo will survive some of the rougher treatment that current paper money can go through.

    --
    John_Chalisque
  37. paper money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was getting tired of hauling all those Krugerrand, American Eagle, and Gold Pandas in my pocket anyways.

  38. Great solution by dynamo · · Score: 1

    as long as it's impossible to make an electronic circuit without government help.

  39. Won't they use it to track people? by sdguero · · Score: 1

    Seems to me it would be pretty easy to scan people as they crossed borders, got on airplanes, or entered a building with RFID scanners. Couldn't this type of tech tell big brother whose money you have and give an idea of where you got it.

    I don't like it. Not one bit. Groups like the NSA, TSA, CIA, etc are already going way too far. I hope this doesn't catch on.

  40. You seem to be worth mugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    W00t, now you can use a simple scanner to determine how much cash someone is carrying! Before you used to have to worry about whether the person you are about to mug is even carrying enough valuables to be worth it, but not any more...

  41. banknote tracking - great by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    "...and would also help to simplify banknote tracking. "

    Cause the government doesn't have enough ways to track us already.

  42. Value? by cyberfunkr · · Score: 1

    The paper bill itself is essentially worthless. It is merely a piece of paper to say the government owes you the value printed; a promissory note.

    By adding in electronics, you're adding value to the note itself. Now the note will have value, but you lose that value when you redeem it. How will we offset the value lost in the possession of these notes? Will my electronic note be worth more than your simple paper note? Will I be paid less when given electronic-filled notes?

    With gold prices generally going up, and the value of the promise of an American Dollar going down, is it possible that the note itself will be worth more than the promised redeem value from the government?

  43. Re:Barter by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    You do know that Barter is against the US tax code, right?
    Up until now (!) the govt had better things to do than track chickens, but conceptually it's in the category of unreported revenue.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  44. No redemptive value by digsbo · · Score: 1

    There is no longer any redemptive value. Nixon completely freed the dollar from its linkage to gold and/or silver in 1973. The dollar now represents only an IOU to return it to the Federal Reserve. In other words, it is worthless.

    1. Re:No redemptive value by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      So, you are saying the best you could do is cash it in for nickles, I guess.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  45. reality is capitalism does not work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get real! And don't censor this comment by hiding it!

    The question should be:

    "why are we still using money?"

    guys we are in 2010, and still speaking of borders, nationality ( or naZionality for better understanding ), money, wars, occupation, flying spaghetti monster called gods, COM'ON grow up!!!
    please lets evolve before is too late!! moneyless society is possible!!! who wants to do, do; who don't want, don't, how simple is that?!?!?

    please get of your xbox,youtube,facebook shit, please lets evolve to a new civilization!!

    PLEASEEEE

    1. Re:reality is capitalism does not work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Optimal resource allocation on such a large scale is an unsolved problem. Knowing the goals based on what the population wants, is an unsolved problem. Motivating people to further the goals of the collective is an unsolved problem. Fair distribution of the output of the economy is an unsolved problem. And yet some people believed plan economics could work.

      Until these problems are solved, it is very hard to think of a system that will work without money.

  46. Think of it as a cash "KILL SWITCH" by jimgarrity · · Score: 1

    If every bill is accountable to you, and has to be checked for validity before the transaction can be completed,
    then all the cash in your pocket can effectively be turned off, at any time.

    If the government doesn't like you, you can't buy anything... not even food.

  47. WHAT?! by killmenow · · Score: 1

    <blockquote><i>The bouillon ownership will be banned like it was pre-1975.</i></blockquote>

    Then how will I make soup?!

    1. Re:WHAT?! by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Well, if gold and silver bullion were banned, you could always try making it out of stones...

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
  48. Eftpos by supertrinko · · Score: 1

    I know my country has already gone electronic.

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
  49. No, doesn't work that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Even if it encodes a digitally signed attestation of cash value with serial number, someone can copy the bar code onto the counterfeit bill. You would also need to verify the barcoded bill identity with some online registry as to who currently holds the "real" copy of that instrument, to determine whether it is a duplicate bill. But, once you've started using online verification, the bill serves no purpose. Just make electronic transfers in the accounts on the online registry. Same strengths, same weaknesses.

    Another approach would be each bill having a signature chain describing its provenance, amended with each transfer of funds. Then you get a sort of web-of-trust path to decide if the bill followed a reasonable path or just appeared out of the back of a counterfeiter's truck. But again, this erases the bill's utility as an anonymous unit of value. People don't like that.

    So you're really stuck with private key storage in the bill, as if each bill were a smart card that is tamper-resistant. Or some analogue circuitry gimmickj that is too expensive to emulate without the scale of production used in the real "mint".

  50. It's not about counterfeiting by goodtimebob · · Score: 1

    Don't believe that it is a measure to stop counterfeits. The majority of the world's counterfeit notes come from North Korea, Iran and Colombia. They can keep up with the technology. The days of some retired printer making bills in his basement are mostly gone. Counterfeit is a miniscule per cent of the world economy. What governments are more interested in is the underground cash economy. Large segments of society works off the books.This means they don't pay taxes. These tags make it easier to track the flow of money. The tags can be read by portable readers smaller than a paperback. These tags are the same kind that are appearing in credit cards. In a recent report a guy walking within a few feet of people on the street was able to read their credit cards.... including account numbers. Now they will also know how much cash and where it came from. Anyone think these readers aren't going to soon be at the entrance to every government building? Good news is that you can already by a sleeve for your cards that blocks the signal. I guess now someone will market blocking wallets.

  51. Finally by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    Oh, so NOW there's gold in our money.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  52. Anything you can do... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...I (meaning the government funded Russian counterfeiter) can do better....

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  53. Just 30 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to disappoint, but we knew about the 666 striping in barcodes - they're timing bars, but they also happen to be the number 6 - when I attended a Christian school in 1978. I'm quite sure the cognizance pre-dated even then.

  54. The Interrogation by Petersko · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Mr. Petersko, we have a record of you receiving this bill at 5:00 p.m. from the ATM. At 5:40 p.m. a marijuana dealer was arrested and he had possession of that bill. Can you explain that?"

    "No, sir, I cannot. From 5:00 p.m. until 5:58 p.m. I was fucking your mother in the alley by the ATM. I can't count it as an alibi because she'll deny it, but if you'll examine her anus you'll find some compelling evidence. Alternatively, take your suspicion and go away."

    And then I'll pray the L.A.-style cop beating will be caught on cell phone.

    1. Re:The Interrogation by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      For plausible deniability, keep a stack of cash. After getting a banknote from a trackable source that can associate it with your identity, keep the note away for a week, a month, or any other amount of time you are comfortable with (and can afford). Then the time window between you accepting the note and the note being intercepted after being spent is large enough to permit significant doubts about its continued association to you.

    2. Re:The Interrogation by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      Or get large bills, pay for something small, and get nice anonymous smaller bills as change.

    3. Re:The Interrogation by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Assuming the point-of-purchase does not log the IDs of the notes involved in the transaction. Which is pretty much possible, but one has to be aware of that possibility.

    4. Re:The Interrogation by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      True, but you can always go to a farmers market or a road-side stand, or anywhere else where the POS is tupperware.

    5. Re:The Interrogation by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Full and total agreement here! :)

  55. Electronic Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get Rich Quick Scheme: Invent Electronic Money!

    Make every single transaction report to the government's wireless network and convey all
    context information about the transaction so that the Government Overlords can adjust the
    "value" of the currency that is being exchanged.

    Collect sales tax at your neighbors yard sale? Decrement the notes value at the point of sale.
    Outlaw gambling? Notes passed over a game of dice will automatically erase their "value".
    Outlaw drugs? Same answer.

    What's not to Love?

  56. Re:Barter by gnapster · · Score: 1

    One does not necessarily follow from the other. At most, it means that barter is a type of revenue that should be reported. Do you know how one might report such revenue? Do you know if there are systems in place to pay taxes in kind? Do you have any references on these issues?

  57. Cash: Use it or lose it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An inconvenient truth for card issuers and merchants is that cash is a lot safer for consumers. It's anonymous and secure; it's impervious to power outages and network outages and clerical or computer errors which require hours on service calls to reconcile. Cash is also privacy-friendly, allowing the consumer to complete a transaction at its face value without paying the tax of ceding personal information and exposing oneself to the identity theft pandemic."

    http://www.meetup.com/socalmartiallawalerts/messages/boards/thread/9675518

  58. MOD PARENT UP by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what is going to happen. Mark my words, if we go purely electronic we will then be owned by the banks, purely.

  59. because cash is in my control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    credit is in their control .
    Also and more subtly , credit is destroyed when you pay a debt . It removes money from the economy . Cash on the other hand just keeps going round .

  60. well by fireylord · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that he'd be happy with 10% of the home computer callout maintenance business of the entire US. He might be a tad busy though, and would probably need to hire some assistants. And a private jet.

  61. Your use of 'a priori' is no substitute for wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'a priori' instead "of as a matter or course", "putatively" where its use adds nothing to the sentence (it's either impartial or it is not. Putatively impartial is not more or less than that).

    And you're wrong. People participate in/with governments because they are always there and they have no choice if they are to have any say at all in how the country is run. Government is that place where the most active and aggressive individuals in society come together to compete with each other to impose their views on the rest of us.

    The fact that you, or I, may or may not agree with some particular measure which they might impose does not mean that we are on the same side.

  62. Banknotes? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I am curious as to what banknotes are really for...?
    Are they for being able to carry large amounts of money (millions) easily in your pocket
    from one bank to another where you want to avoid the possibility of getting robbed....
    could one bank manager just be able to contact another and make a transfer from one account into another...
    if anyone has any insight, I would really appreciate it....would help me understand the scenario more clearly.

  63. Gold. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    The only true money is the kind of stuff that has been used as money for thousands of years and can always be traded for.

    Gold, silver, platinum, nickel, copper, uranium, all of it is good.

    But I prefer gold personally, it doesn't rot.

  64. Used for evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch this help glom to who exactly is carrying large amounts of money on their person.
    A mugger or gold-digger's friend.

    This will help speed the move away from cash.

  65. I think you've hit upon something important here by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    I also do the barter system, but that's mostly for weed dealers

    Weed. The new currency for the 21st century.

  66. There's a really easy solution to that problem by sean.peters · · Score: 2

    Don't make it optional. When you stop printing paper bills in favor of polymer, and remove all the paper bills from circulation as they return to banks (same process that happens now with existing bills), people will use them.

    And I have approximately zero sympathy for the argument that we should give up on a solution that's more economical and harder to counterfeit because "people don't like the way they feel".

  67. Re:Barter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do know that if you hand your friend a $100 bill and he hands it back to you, the government thinks it is entitled to skim off a percentage of both of those "gifts", right?

  68. Re:Barter by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Yes, I meant "unreported Barter" is against the US tax code. Broadly speaking, the US code runs on the starter principle "report any revenue of any kind anywhere". As for precisely where, I'm expecting some major tax code changes will float through within the next couple of years because President Obama has been involved with that area recently, but it usually takes another year for Gov action to show up on actual forms. Roughly, for "scam-barter" attempts like thousands of dollars of swap it shows up in one of the "other income / non-cash transaction" rules on the various forms like schedules C for small biz, D for stocks, and E for Rental.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  69. Re:Barter by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Fortunately for you, there is also a Gift clause that lets you escape happily as an untracked AC for small amounts like that.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine