Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs Health Worries Escalate

PolygamousRanchKid writes with this sad snippet from the San Francisco Chronicle: "We all know that Steve Jobs is sick. What's not known is how sick he is, and that's worrying investors of Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) this morning, as well as everyone else. Jobs did have pancreatic cancer a few years ago, but he had a transplant and was able to come back to work. Last time, he gave some kind of time frame for returning to work. This time, he did not. Supposedly the National Enquirer is set to run pictures of Jobs with him looking frail and gaunt. Jobs was spotted leaving the Stanford Cancer Center in Palo Alto, California, according to RadarOnline.com."

363 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who cares? let the man live his own life

    1. Re:who cares by Tanktalus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure why this is marked troll. Seriously, let's keep peoples' private lives private, and only publicise public aspects of their lives.

    2. Re:who cares by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I sold my shares at $19. And have forgotten how to breathe.

      *sigh*

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that shareholders of two (or 10,000) shares of HP wouldn't really care what happens to the CEO when he resigns/retires.

      This is a man who's almost become mythical whose works are hyper-analyzed every time they're released. Sorry, but if you want to enjoy the large profit margins that come from that kind of mystique, you have to accept that people are going to analyze you when you may not wish to be looked at.

      I don't agree with it, but I don't see how you can have one without the other.

    4. Re:who cares by bonch · · Score: 1

      He didn't resign.

    5. Re:who cares by KhabaLox · · Score: 2

      Stockholders. Jobs, love him or hate him, is more important to Apple than probably any CEO has been to his/her respective company ever.

      The company has a duty to be forthcoming about their knowledge of his health, and what that means for the future profitability of Apple. If he wanted privacy, he shouldn't have filed an IPO.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    6. Re:who cares by DurendalMac · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Mouth breather"? The guy took a company that was less than a year from bankruptcy and turned it into a ludicrously profitable empire with the second largest market cap in the US and $6 billion in profits last quarter. If Jobs is a "mouth breather" then everyone on /. is a fucking drooling retard with a bike helmet and a padded room.

    7. Re:who cares by crymeph0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even a healthy Steve Jobs could get hit by a bus tomorrow. If you find yourself needing to know the health details of a particular individual before buying a stock, you shouldn't be looking at that stock in the first place. It is not healthy for a company as large as Apple to be dependent on a single man. Mind you, I bet Apple has plenty of excellent designers, and will actually survive the eventual demise of Steve Jobs, whether it's tonight or 1000 years from now, but the reality distortion field around Jobs seems to make otherwise reasonable people forget very basic rules of investing and value.

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    8. Re:who cares by Stregano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when he turns himself into a posterboy for Apple, he becomes a celebrity. I don't know if you know this, but Apple is pretty big now-a-days. If he is the face of it, well, let's just say he has successfully hit celebrity status whether he likes it or not, whether you like it or not, and whether I like it or not.

      --
      The world is how you make it
    9. Re:who cares by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      I reckon that the Apple cult is going to make up stories about Steve's body being lifted into the heavens after he eventually dies? Not that I'm wishing him dead any time soon, I hope he lives a long time and just never returns to work. He's done enough damage to personal computing for one lifetime. He should beat this cancer thing or whatever and go relax by the pool.

    10. Re:who cares by dzfoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know, "self-declared" means that he has declared himself a god. As far I know he has not done so.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    11. Re:who cares by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      who cares?

      The shareholders of his publicly-traded personality cult care.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    12. Re:who cares by blunte · · Score: 1

      That's a nice idea, but since the US practically revolves around the stock market, Steve Jobs' health is of utmost concern to "the powers that be".

      If our economy wasn't so utterly leveraged against play money, the man could have some peace. Not "The Man", mind you, but the man. And hell, "The People" could have better peace too I'm sure.

      --
      .sigs are for post^Hers.
    13. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He declared himself god? That's neat. Normally that kind of thing doesn't go over very well in the press. I guess the journalistic chops of Luckyo has scooped everyone.

      Just because people like the stuff his company produces, doesn't make them religious. It might make them picky bastards, but not religious.

    14. Re:who cares by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because unlike with other CxOs Steve Jobs has purposely built a cult of personality around him that will seriously affect the stock. A good example of the difference is MSFT, where if you ask the average Joe they still think Gates runs the thing. If Ballmer was hit by a car tomorrow nobody outside the tech world would take much notice and it is doubtful that the stock would take a nosedive.

      Now compare that to Jobs where we HAVE seen the stock take a serious hit just from a phony death rumor. IMHO Steve Jobs has failed Apple by not pushing a successor the second he came back from the transplant. he should have been grooming his successor from day one and pushing them beside him in the spotlight wherever possible. instead you have had Steve take front and center (typical narcissist behavior) the SECOND he was able to get back to work and all talks about successors went the way of the Newton.

      So honestly Steve deserves no privacy because he brought it upon himself by making himself the center of the Apple universe and not doing anything to stop the "cult of Steve" hell if anything he pumped it up. So just like any other business where rightly or wrongly success if believed to hinge on a key component or player, so too does Steve's health affect the bottom line and the shareholders have a right to know. If Steve didn't want it to be this way he could have been sharing the spotlight and grooming his replacement, but I guess Steve doesn't do well with sharing.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:who cares by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 1

      From my understanding about the history of Apple, Steve Jobs IS Apple. Without Jobs, there would be no Apple. It's hard to groom a successor when the whole company runs around a single person as opposed to a board of directors with voting power, a corporate mission, etc.

    16. Re:who cares by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

      The Beetles once said that they were bigger than Jesus and they got excellent pre--- oh wait... Never mind... I always feel bad for jobs. I bet you anything he hates Apple and wants to leave that place but he's chained there like a dog.

    17. Re:who cares by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

      The problem with Apple is that Steve Jobs is like that one guy that people will love and follow his words. If he says this phone is revolutionary when it isn't, people will buy it. If he says this tablet is innovative and is the future of all mankind, people will bite and get it. Heck, I remember a few years ago, the "grand" announcement at the yearly Apple Convention was something insanely stupid like a $100 case or something but people loved it anyways. Apple doesn't make bad products and they certainly appeal to a specific group of individuals, but in reality Apple doesn't have what Microsoft has and it certainly can't compete against Linux RHE kind of distros.

      So in the end of it all... Apple is relying mostly on the one man that they fired long ago. This is ironic and if Jobs dies and Apple goes along with him, then I'll be obviously sad that Jobs will have died but I'll be happy for Steve that Apple got what they deserved after what they did to him. He's basically being used and he's known this since he got hired again back in was it 2002?

    18. Re:who cares by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The iPhone revolutionized the phone business. The iPad revolutionized the tablet market. You may or may not like them as products, but that much is incontrovertibly true.

    19. Re:who cares by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      The guy is a high-profile "celebrity", so the media will follow him around just like they do any other celebrity.

      "It comes with the job" is all I'm saying.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    20. Re:who cares by zmughal · · Score: 1

      Being used? Funny how things come around. Jobs has always been the business mind that was willing to basically screw over Woz the engineer back when Woz designed the Breakout game board for Atari. [Link]

    21. Re:who cares by defaria · · Score: 1

      Jobs is not a private person. What he does effects Apple big time. As such, his private life is public business.

    22. Re:who cares by tyrione · · Score: 1

      When you're essentially a self-declared God with your own religion and following, living a private life is troublesome.

      Steve has never advertised himself so vainly. You have for him. Get a life.

    23. Re:who cares by plover · · Score: 1

      the reality distortion field around Jobs seems to make otherwise reasonable people forget very basic rules of investing and value.

      Spoken like a responsible long-term investor. In other words, someone to be taken advantage of.

      If you were instead to think like a typical short term trader of any sort (day trader, hedge fund manager wielding billions of dollars) things like basic rules of investing or value simply don't matter. When news of the CEO's health can cause a temporary fluctuation in the stock's value, you act quickly to take advantage of the situation. The true worth of the stock or stability of the company doesn't mean anything if you can short 100,000 stocks at $360 in the morning and clean up when they hit $355 in the afternoon. By the time you long-term investors begin to realize what's happening, the vultures have already drained real value from your investments, and punched AAPL's good name in the nose.

      --
      John
    24. Re:who cares by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      What was the name of the company that has distribution rights to beatles' songs?

      Coincidence or divine providence?

      And dear fanboys/girls, for the love of Steve, fix your sarcasm meters already. I do have a lot of karma to burn, but the tug of war on the grandparent's mods is hilarious.

    25. Re:who cares by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The word 'revolutionized' in the sense that you're using it is pure marketing hype.

      Drill down a little further and explain what you mean by the term. You aren't giving us enough to do anything with except stand in awe, or whatever.

    26. Re:who cares by macs4all · · Score: 2

      He's done enough damage to personal computing for one lifetime

      Exactly what DAMAGE has SJ done to "personal computing"?

      Seriously.

    27. Re:who cares by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Definitely ,I may not like the guy's vision on technology (DRM, closedness, overprice, etc) but I am really sad he is having health issues.

      Poor Steve, in fact, poor anyone who has to fight a daily fight just to feel OK. I myself do something similar, except (fortunately) it is on a minor scale (not cancer!).

      I hope he gets very well soon and can continue to enjoy doing what he most likes.
       

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    28. Re:who cares by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Has he does this purposefully or is he just a control freak?

      I think the public has let their Jobs fascination get the better of them.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    29. Re:who cares by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Well, before the iPhone most people considered smartphones to be a pain in the ass when it came to the user interface. The only ones who disagreed were the rabid fanboys trying to explain why their new $700 smartphone was super user friendly by letting you access the browser by just using the special pen to tap "menu", then tap "internet", then tap "connections", then tap "<ProviderName> 3G", then tap "Yes, I want to connect", then tap "exit", then tap "Browser", then tap "Menu", then tap "Go to page", then tap "Enter address manually", then type in the url, then hit "Ok" and wait for three minutes while the dog-slow browser attempted to load the page. And yes, that's pretty much the procedure for using the web on my last Nokia (Symbian) phone. Oh, and once you're done you have to shut down the browser and once again head to "connections" to tell it to disconnect...

      Before the iPhone the vast majority of mobile phones, "smart" or not, had user interfaces that seemed like they were designed by people who had no idea what a user interface is.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    30. Re:who cares by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      *takes aim*

    31. Re:who cares by eddy_crim · · Score: 1

      who give a crap about where the ideas come from, its ability to execute thats important

      --
      hmmm.
    32. Re:who cares by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 2

      I don't believe you ever had a Symbian phone. For one, they didn't use styluses because they had no touch screens. The method you described may apply to windows mobile, although having used it only on very rare occasions I cannot confirm that. But on Symbian at least you just start the browser, type the address (it implicitly starts with the cursor already on the address field, you just type) or select it from bookmarks and indeed the connection menu pops up with a list of available connections, allowing you to select one and that's pretty much it. You do not need to close the connection manually and I don't think that ever was the case with Symbian.

      That doesn't mean that it wasn't clunky, but you have to remember that they did not use touch screens. What Iphone did was leapfrog Windows Mobile that indeed clung stupidly to the idea that a phone should work the same way as a desktop computer so that people would not need to learn a new interface. There were other manufacturers that had the same idea at the time, such as LG, but Apple executed and marketed it way better. It was not a revolution though, it was an evolution that would have happened without them anyway.

      Apple just delivered the market a swift kick in the pants, as the manufacturers at the time were really trying to drip-feed innovations and segment the market to aberrant extents (such as Sony Ericsson with phones that were marketed for youth, but made them choose between camera or mp3 player, because there was no way that someone into music would like to take good photos), and we all benefited from this.

      But, again, it wasn't a revolution, it was just evolution, although it certainly wasn't marketed as such.

    33. Re:who cares by Artifex · · Score: 1

      You know, "self-declared" means that he has declared himself a god. As far I know he has not done so.

                -dZ.

      Then you don't know Steve.....

      [citation needed]

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    34. Re:who cares by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      True, I did not have a stylus with my Symbian phone, it was menu driven. The model I was thinking about with regards to the procedure (except using the keys for navigation rather than a stylus) was the Nokia 7610 which was very much a Symbian phone. It was extremely clunky (and didn't have 3G support, only GPRS). I chose the route needed to visit a random website on that phone simply because in my mind it stands out as a great example of horrible UI design (the email client on it was similarly screwy with the added benefit of it attempting to download the full contents of all mailboxes when setting up an IMAP account on it). I'm not even going to go into the out of memory errors that would pop up when receiving a call if the phone had been on for too long...

      In my mind the iPhone was still a revolution according to the following definition: "A sudden, vast change in a situation, a discipline, or the way of thinking and behaving.".

      The iPhone forced other manufacturers to actually start caring about the user interface and the user experience. Previously it was mostly a competition of feature lists and replaceable phone shells.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    35. Re:who cares by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They don't need Jobs, just a 1970s Braun catalogue.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    36. Re:who cares by gtall · · Score: 1

      Apple's price/earnings hovers around 20. So if there is any froth in the stock, it isn't showing up where you'd expect it to show up, so it would seem otherwise reasonable people are not forgetting the basic rules of investing and value. Maybe you could try some other equally dumb argument.

    37. Re:who cares by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      Well, all is well if the only thing you could compare the original 2007 Iphone to was a 2004 Nokia model. Now I understand that for you the Iphone was a revolution. For someone who stayed current with the market, it wasn't.

    38. Re:who cares by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      Ever watch the movie Idiocracy? Steve just struck when the ground was becoming ever more fertile - or consumers were becoming ever more flock-able.

    39. Re:who cares by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Your forgetting about Woz desiging the Apple 1 during his spare time. Jobs is likely a marketing savant, but without Woz Apple would not have happened in the first place (unless Jobs had found some other engineer to graft onto).

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    40. Re:who cares by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Yes, the 7610 was pretty old but I've had similar experiences with other more recent smartphones, it's just that it was the last "true smartphone" I had myself pre-iPhone and thus the only one with which I could actually remember the bizarre path to take just in order to launch the browser.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    41. Re:who cares by idlehanz · · Score: 1

      I partially agree and partially disagree.

      Where I agree is that Jobs has created a cult of personality. While he and Apple have been successful to a point, this shows a leadership limitation. Perhaps Jobs has been grooming someone for the job and this will be revealed in due course, but I doubt it. So, yes, investors should be worried. One of the first jobs anyone has, regardless of level, in terms of leadership, is identifying and grooming your succesor. You can't move up unless you can be replaced (of course for those that worry about being replaced or outsourced, yeah, being good at your job helps avoid this).

      Where I disagree is that just because one makes a leadership mistake does not entitle the rest of the world to stick their nose into his private business.

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
    42. Re:who cares by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Was this your attitude when Rush Limbaugh's medical record was splashed all over CNN?

    43. Re:who cares by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I see you don't understand how corporations work. His health will directly influence the direction Apple takes in the future.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    44. Re:who cares by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      You're looking at the wrong guy. I'm more in line with Rush than Obama. But neither one should have their medical records splashed in public. I'm not a Jobs fan, but he's still a human being and deserves his privacy for things that are not meant to be public, e.g., health, family.

      Things that might need to be made public might include Obama's birth record, to prove his citizenship (damnit, people, OF COURSE he was born in the US, you don't think that's about the first thing the Secret Service is going to check when running for President?). But if someone is suffering due to a stroke, let him be. Though, again, with anyone in power, a temporary reassignment of that power might be in order, but details of the disease/condition do not need to be made public. "Jobs suffered a medical condition, and has withdrawn from day-to-day operations" is already lots of information. No more is needed. Similarly, if the President were to suffer a medical condition, announcing that his VP was taking over temporarily (or permanently if it becomes required) is all that needs to be said. Leave the human being behind the title alone. Seriously.

    45. Re:who cares by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs has purposely built a cult of personality around him

      "Purposely"?! [[citation really, really needed]]

    46. Re:who cares by crymeph0 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say the market as a whole was behaving irrationally regarding Steve Jobs' health, only that the people who insist they need to know his private health details to properly value the company are. But, you know, you called me dumb, so I guess that makes you right.

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    47. Re:who cares by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Could you link to a specific model of phone that came out before the iPhone that was comparable?

    48. Re:who cares by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Jobs is an ergonomics savant - something severely lacking in today's computer industry. His talent is finding the envelope between what people do do and can do, and enticing users to buy products that are just far enough into the 'can' territory for them to grasp - and appreciate. I could even go as far as to say that it's not just Apple's future on the line in that regard, it's that of the entire computer industry.

      Jobs before was more of a maverick than anything, but through his persistance, all in maintaining his maverick status, he has also become a financial heavywheight. These days, the 'commercial guys' are slow to finance the production of any product that isn't selling already, so Jobs is even more alone in his role. If we really want to have more innovators in the marketplace, the finance guys are going to have to grow a pair and start financing projects that benifit the user experience before all, not just sales.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
  2. He's probably dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Abdominal cancers are not fun. Pancreatic cancers are almost always fatal. I'm sure his wealth has probably bought him time... but you can't cheat death.

    1. Re:He's probably dying by overshoot · · Score: 2, Informative

      you can't cheat death.

      Sure you can -- just like you can cheat the Mob. Long term, the results are about the same, too.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    2. Re:He's probably dying by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can't we just leave him alone? I mean, when he bashes on Google openly, let the press and everyone else fire full power. It's fair game.

      But now? Doesn't he deserve some privacy or even just some respect? Not because of what he's done, be because of what he is living right now.

    3. Re:He's probably dying by the_humeister · · Score: 2

      He had a pancreatic endocrine neoplasm (median survival of 7 years), which is much better than pancreatic adenocarcinoma (2% 5-year survival).

    4. Re:He's probably dying by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I highly doubt his money helped him get a liver any faster.

      It probably kept him alive long enough to reach the top of the list, though.

      And anyone saying he hasn't done anything useful since they buttoned it up is not paying attention.

    5. Re:He's probably dying by lvangool · · Score: 1

      Pretty sick thought, even for Slashdot...judging from your liver remark while this was or still is pancreatic cancer, you are probably better left ignored.

    6. Re:He's probably dying by khallow · · Score: 2

      And possibly wasted a liver someone else could have used for a lot longer.

      It's a shame to see someone obsessed over who gets the liver while ignoring two things. You can always find someone more deserving of a particular organ. Such judgments are highly subjective. I, for example, was more deserving of that liver even though I had no use for it. I don't think it fair of Mr. Jobs that we have people, with no right, obligation, or clue in the matter, to second-guess how an organ is used.

      Second, the issue of who gets the liver is nothing compared to the problem of people dying. We can and will figure out how to grow livers so that this particular horrible lottery goes away some day. We won't fix the problem of people dying as easily.

      But that is the real medical problem. It's not who gets the liver or whether this procedure will help a person live longer. It's the fundamental problem that our bodies decay and we haven't figured out how to fix that yet. It's just my humble opinion, but I think we will eventually figure that out, be it in a few decades or a few millennia.

      I can't help but view opinions such as the above with cynicism. Obsession with "fairness", deciding who gets what scarce medical benefit, happens at the expense of actual treatment of illness and infirmity. It hurts us all.

    7. Re:He's probably dying by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You have to be able to get to the hospital in X hours, by having access to a private plane that was that many more hospitals he could sign up for their organ lists. This is a relatively benign thing a rich person can do to get a better shot at an organ.

      As another example of rich folks getting organs in slightly shady ways I present Mickey Mantle.

    8. Re:He's probably dying by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      He had a liver transplant. He admitted that, it is not uncommon for a person to need one due to pancreatic cancer. See that is the thing about cancer it spreads.

    9. Re:He's probably dying by izomiac · · Score: 2

      The transplant list is based on medical necessity and the likelihood of survival (e.g. if someone is still drinking they won't get a liver). Being rich doesn't change that. What does change is, if you have access to a private jet, you can be placed on the transplant list in a very wide area. A poor person might just be able to get to a single city within a few hours, but Steve Jobs could probably be anywhere in a ten state region in the same amount of time. If he didn't get that liver, the next person would've needed it a bit less, or it might have even gone to waste.

    10. Re:He's probably dying by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I stated that fact above. How do they sort medical necessity and likelihood of survival though. I would think long term outcome would be the highest priority. I would also though believe that organs should be flown via private flights, not patients. To ensure the patient with the best outcome/most need can get it.

    11. Re:He's probably dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, b, a, select, start...

    12. Re:He's probably dying by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

      My understanding was that Job's form of pancreatic cancer is not the almost-guaranteed-to-be-fatal kind that Patrick Swayze had.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:He's probably dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would wager that Steve Jobs with pancreatic cancer has contributed more to society and technology than you will in your whole life.

    14. Re:He's probably dying by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that has any bearing on how long he will be able to make use of this liver.

    15. Re:He's probably dying by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Terminal's good, but I like terminator, myself. Works on every OS and has a killer set of features!

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    16. Re:He's probably dying by izomiac · · Score: 2

      Liver transplants generally aren't considered if the long-term outcome isn't going to be good. For those who would benefit, it's mostly based on MELD score. MELD essentially predicts what chance they have of living for three months. So, the person who won't live to see the next liver is prioritized over the otherwise healthy person who can wait a bit longer. Plus, people go to the organ since they're still able to move around, the transplant needs to take place in a large medical center, and because the first person called might be unavailable for some unfortunate reason. Generally, if you're on the transplant list, you're already in the hospital you'll get the transplant in. The super wealthy usually get nursing care and such in their own home once they're stable enough, so they're a bit different.

    17. Re:He's probably dying by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      We can just look at the expiration dates on peoples' birth certificates!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    18. Re:He's probably dying by bonch · · Score: 1

      Looks like someone forgot to check the "Post anonymously" box.

    19. Re:He's probably dying by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      I think that when you get yourself into the position of being the central visionary figure in a world-changing company, then your right to privacy is gone by default. Many people think that if Jobs dies, then Apple dies, and that's definitely newsworthy, whether or not you like Apple or its products and ecosystem. His health is a major factor in any investment decision.

    20. Re:He's probably dying by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      It probably kept him alive long enough to reach the top of the list, though.

      Some discussion of that:
      http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/01/18/steve-jobs-went-to-switzerland-in-search-of-cancer-treatment/

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    21. Re:He's probably dying by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      Obama better hope he doesn't need a organ transplant. *ducks*

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    22. Re:He's probably dying by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that Job's form of pancreatic cancer is not the almost-guaranteed-to-be-fatal kind that Patrick Swayze had.

      You mean in Ghost? You mean getting stabbed in it by a pretend mugger? You mean that kind?

      I thought I was making a funny but I googled it and found out that Patrick Swayze died (no Ghost jokes please, this is a solemn subject). I did not know that. I am an insensitive clod.

      How solemn.

      So you made an insensitive joke, realized it was insensitive...but still posted it, and then criticized yourself?

    23. Re:He's probably dying by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      Paraphrasing George Carlin:

      Some people think that if you mention something bad, that it will happen. Some people are fucking stupid!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    24. Re:He's probably dying by richardcavell · · Score: 2

      Correct, his type is an endocrine tumour that is quite rare and not the usual type. However, we know that Jobs' cancer has spread, he required a liver transplant for it, that he's on immunosuppressive drugs following the liver transplant, etc... He's a sick boy whichever way you look at it. (Doctor) Richard Cavell

    25. Re:He's probably dying by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      I think we can have a more fair system of allocating organs. It could be based solely on how long the person will be able to use it for instance. The 5 year outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer is not good, even with this sort of treatment. Determining how organs are allocated does not happen at the expense of actual treatment, it can be done solely based on statistics.

      Wow, Mr. "I play a MD on Slashdot", do tell me more about what you know about the MELD score.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    26. Re:He's probably dying by mirix · · Score: 1

      Eh? I thought the terminator ran on a 6502.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    27. Re:He's probably dying by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      Can't cheat death? Just you wait till the story breaks that Watson was bought out and suddenly renamed to Jobs.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    28. Re:He's probably dying by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Maybe the OPs backspace key is busted.

    29. Re:He's probably dying by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      You have to be able to get to the hospital in X hours, by having access to a private plane that was that many more hospitals he could sign up for their organ lists. This is a relatively benign thing a rich person can do to get a better shot at an organ.

      When you get signed up to be an organ recipient, you don't get on different lists per hospital. It's a national registry run by UNOS. Recipients are prioritized based on seriousness of illness then first come, first serve once a match is established. Having a private plane doesn't really offer you any advantage in being selected. Based on the severity that was reported, getting to a hospital shouldn't have been a problem as Jobs should have been in a hospital due to the severity of the illness. Also from what I remember, it was a private donation as a liver is one of the few organs that you can receive from a living donor as the liver will regenerate.

      Now you could argue that having money made it easier for him to find a private donor but Jobs did not game the OPTN system; he bypassed it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    30. Re:He's probably dying by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Fair how specifically? Organ recipients are already excluded for factors like age or health or have already received a transplant of the same organ. Like a person with end-stage terminal cancer may need a new organ but may not be strong enough to survive the transplant is often excluded. They are also excluded if they have any diseases which may limit the effectiveness of the transplant.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    31. Re:He's probably dying by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The doctors make that determination based on a number of factors. Age and general health are factors. Existing diseases are another. Previous transplant history is taken into account. A healthy 30 year old is more likely to get an organ than an 80 year with chronic but unrelated disease.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    32. Re:He's probably dying by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

      And the food you eat every day...some of that could have gone to starving children in africa. Granted it would have been moldy as hell by the time it got there but still.

    33. Re:He's probably dying by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

      And I present Mickey Mouse. You dont really think Uncle Walt died of natural causes do you. Mickey needed a liver so......

    34. Re:He's probably dying by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      He can always give it to the next guy?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    35. Re:He's probably dying by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

      You may not see how that has any bearing, but I'm sure society does.
      By the way, have you signed up to be an organ donor?

    36. Re:He's probably dying by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Always have been. I am also donating what is left after that to science. Heck, I think organ donation should be opt-out, not opt-in.

    37. Re:He's probably dying by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      This terminator.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    38. Re:He's probably dying by defaria · · Score: 1

      In a word - no. He doesn't deserve this any more or any less than any other person who has put himself in such a position where his health is integrally tied into the success or failure of a company. It's news, and it's important and it will affect Apple. Why, because that's how he set it up. It is his own doing. Many, many fortune 500 companies have CEO who the public barely knows and who, if they bite the bullet, will not effect the company that much. In Jobs' case, that is not the case. I'm not saying, wish him death or anything like that, personally I hope he pulls through this too, but his health is definitely a public matter precisely because of the position he has put himself into.

    39. Re:He's probably dying by tyrione · · Score: 2

      The guy is a fascist asshole. I personally wouldn't wish cancer on anyone - even a fascist asshole - but the fact remains that he's a jerk. Being ill doesn't make him angelic and above criticism or (god forbid) mere comment - as is the case here. Job's health is news for nerds because he is the leader of a cult that has a lot of influence in the IT world. If he dies, the effects on the Apple cult will be profound. Mentioning any of this isn't evil, bad, perverted or whatever, it's just news.

      Unless you feel better than everyone else by posting that sanctimonious crap.

      You'r a fucking tool. You know jack $hit about the man. Perhaps you got shot down more than once for a job? I don't know, nor do I care. Yet, throwing around fascist like it's a punchline only leads me to conclude you're a fucking tool.

    40. Re:He's probably dying by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      It's a sad pathetic victim society that believes you deserve respect for getting sick. Steve Jobs has enough money and power that he could easily have done plenty to earn respect for doing good or amazing things. Many people he does deserve it for what he has done with Apple.

      For getting sick though... No, he does not deserve any respect for that.

    41. Re:He's probably dying by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      the problem he's working on now is how to get out with the money.. alive! Life has a 100% mortality rate... somebody should make a law...

      In other news Steve's warranty is voided... there are no "user serviceable" inside. Changing the squishy-ware is not supported.

    42. Re:He's probably dying by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      If he'd quit Apple, then I'm sure we would. Meanwhile, he's the CEO of a major, publicly-held company, and he's just said he's going on indefinite leave, and no, he's not going to tell them what Apple's plans are if he leaves for good. Speculation is going to happen - moreover, it's justified while ever other people's money is invested in his company.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    43. Re:He's probably dying by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Actually, your command of language is wrong.

      This:
      not
      is a negation. You should look out for them when they crop up. Noticing them might stop you looking like an arrogant twat on public forums.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    44. Re:He's probably dying by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Many, many people of considerably more wealth and power than Steve Jobs have died. It's kinda inevitable.

      There's only so much that money can buy, and someone like Jobs has that to face in the end. Just like the rest of us.

    45. Re:He's probably dying by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Real slashdotters punch out their comments on paper tape before inserting them into the paper tape reader to upload them. There's a ratchet on the paper tape reader, the paper can't go backwards.

    46. Re:He's probably dying by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Obama better hope he doesn't need a organ transplant. *ducks*

      He could while away the hours Conferring with the flowers Consulting with the rain...

    47. Re:He's probably dying by multi+io · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt his money helped him get a liver any faster.

      Well, are you sure? Maybe it helped him get one at all? If we assume that his liver problem was related to the neuroendocrine cancer he had 6 years ago, then what could that liver problem have been, other than metastases in the liver? He's not a heavy drinker, after all. So, assuming he had metastases in the liver from a cancer that started outside the liver, wouldn't that normally be an incurable condition to begin with? I read that liver transplants are rarely used as a cancer treatment, and if so, then only for cancers that originate in the liver, not for liver metastases.

    48. Re:He's probably dying by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      Seriously. What. The. Fuck.

      Use the magic word and you lose!!!!

      Great argument - good points, well made. Hope you feel smart.

    49. Re:He's probably dying by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I would love to see Jobs spend a large amount of money on short term medical research with an emphasis on lateral thinking. We could learn a lot that way and it would benefit a lot of patients. Seriously, lets rip his brain out, build a life support system for it and install it in a robot body. Sounds radical but I reckon its worth a go if your budget is in the billions.

    50. Re:He's probably dying by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      Your use of "fucking" and "$hit" in the same comment leads me to believe you are also a tool.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    51. Re:He's probably dying by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I hope you die painfully. And soon.

      You really have no idea what Fascism is. And you're an ignorant, petty and jealous piece of shit.

    52. Re:He's probably dying by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      His wealth helped him get a transplant faster. Period. It was documented. Jobs was on all of the transplant lists across the country. Most people cannot do this. They cannot fly across the country at the drop of a hat. Jobs can. That is why his wealth enabled him to get a transplant faster.

      As to why he got the transplant faster then other people, I think his wealth had something to do with that too. For the real answer we need to speak with the people who run the transplant lists.

    53. Re:He's probably dying by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      I know what fascism is perfectly well, in the historical context and as a concept in itself.

      Your wishing pain and death on me does you proud. Good job. You Apple fans are such lovely, reasonable people. All hail the cult!

  3. Leave Steve Jobs Alone by deutschemonte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Leave him alone!

    -Android Fanboy

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by MooseMuffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, leave him alone. Even more so if he's actually dying.

    2. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by sarysa · · Score: 1

      Leave him alone!

      -Android Fanboy

      I'm trying to figure out if you meant that to be multilayered humor or not...

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    3. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by deutschemonte · · Score: 1

      Humor as it relates to a crying YouTube video, but mentioned I am anf Android fanboy to show my sincerity.

      --
      The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    4. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Sorry, he's an officer of a publicly held company. Other people need to know about his health in order to properly plan. If he came out and said "I have Stage IV cancer with a 3-6 month mortality prognosis" that would be one thing, but the secrecy is irresponsible, and in fact generates interest. Why else would a trashy celebrity news site follow him around?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 2

      There's a difference between speculation from a respectful standpoint and tabloids plastering bullshit everywhere to make a point. There is also a disturbing number of internet denizens who honestly think it is funny to make fun of someone dying or try and trivialize it because they don't like iPods or think that it's edgy or something.

    6. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      Why else would a trashy celebrity news site follow him around?

      Slashdot?

    7. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by MooseMuffin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe he's just a guy with cancer who doesn't want to spend his last days dying in the public eye while they discuss how to best profit from his passing?

    8. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      He's stepped aside. His health is no longer the concern of the shareholders.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by Grail · · Score: 1

      What should be of interest to shareholders of any company is the succession planning. Any CEO could be hit by a bus/train or (more likely in the USA) cop a bullet in a drive by shooting. Do you include the question of succession planning when you are researching stocks to buy?

    10. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Cancer survival is highly uncertain. Some people beat the averages by many years. Investors already know that Jobs probably is not going to be personally micromanaging Apple for many years longer. Those who think that is critical in the near term have already sold their stock. The value of the additional knowledge given to investors who hope to "time the market" in order to maximally profit from Jobs's death or permanent retirement (or more optimistically, his return to full-time management status) hardly justifies the invasion of his privacy.

    11. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by t2t10 · · Score: 1

      Tabloids wouldn't have to speculate if he disclosed his condition.

    12. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      Of course not.

      Then again, I can't think of an executive who is as important to his company as Steve Jobs is to Apple. They tried the "running without him" thing. What happened? Apple nearly went bankrupt, while Jobs went and bought a hardware company named Pixar for $10 million, turned it into an animation studio and sold it for $7.6 billion. Apple realized its mistake and brought him back, and is now one of the biggest companies in the world.

      That's... a big turn around. To be quite honest, I don't think Jobs is as important to Apple now as he was then. As a company I think Apple is pretty much at a point where it could just coast for a while; beyond the point where anything as dramatic as bankruptcy was on the horizon. But if I were an investor, that's scary. And more than just being scary, it's a bad sign. Apple does not pay dividends; the way that investors make money on a growth company is by the company, you know. Growing. Are you confident that not only will Apple tread water once Steve Jobs retires or passes away, but it will actually continue to grow? I wouldn't be. As the investors are pushing for right now, I would at least want to know what the company's plans are for when that time comes.

      Growing up, one of my dad's mottos was "different strokes for different folks." My brother was always angry that my bedtime was later than his at whatever my age (and gone by the time I was 12 or so) -- but then again he ditched school as if it was some sort of religious observance and ended up dropping out (he since went back but that is neither here nor there), while I would get myself up no matter when I went to bed, go to school and get good grades. Just because we're both people and both children of the same parents doesn't mean we necessarily need to be treated the same, just as the fact that Apple being a company somebody might invest in doesn't mean it needs to be treated identically to any other company somebody might invest in. You judge things on their merits. I doubt anybody cares if, say, Steve Ballmer dies or leaves Microsoft -- but they care if Steve Jobs does the same with Apple. For good reason.

    13. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      No. I also do not include the possibility of any number of other extremely low probability events.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    14. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      There is also a disturbing number of internet denizens who honestly think it is funny to make fun of someone dying or try and trivialize it because they don't like iPods or think that it's edgy or something.

      Um, no; cracking jokes at Death's expense is the only way we have of getting back at Him. QUIET YOU. okay!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    15. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      I see the Apple fan boys have mod points

    16. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by defaria · · Score: 1

      To me he looks too much like the guy in "The 6th day" where the evil ruler of the corporate empire keeps cloning himself and the clone gets up and kills the current version of the CEO to replace him. Coincidence? I think not!

    17. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      where did you get that idea? as per apple, he is still intimately involved in all major strategic decisions at the company.

    18. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Then maybe he should resign from his key post in a publicly-traded company? He doesn't need to disclose any details - just say he's leaving for "personal" or "health" reasons.

      Then Apple can decide who to put up next, shareholders can react accordingly, and everyone can let Steve Jobs die in peace.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    19. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by drerwk · · Score: 1

      It is not a secret that he is private about his health^H^H^H^H^H non-apple life, nor am I aware of an instance where he has given false info regarding his health. So, any investor that cares to factor lack of knowledge about Job's health and the resultant uncertainty can do so. No one forces anyone to invest in APPL. Are you really saying the Enquirer is doing this to inform investors? I think it is to sell papers with any vulgar info that works for them.

    20. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to consider that you're on the apple.slashdot.org domain. That matters more than many people think.

      This isn't real slashdot.

    21. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      He stepped out of the spotlight, but seemingly left a void there....

      But Kentucky Fried Chicken survived the death of Colonel Sanders, so maybe Apple will be alright, too.

    22. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Harland Sanders got cheated by his partners. The first thing they did after they got rid of him was change all of KFC's recipes to be lower quality. He went to his grave bitter that his image and legacy were attached to such crap food.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    23. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      By "getting rid of him", they paid him a couple of million bucks, which was a helluva lot of money in the mid 60s.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    24. Re:Leave Steve Jobs Alone by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      Not me - I'm reading through /. proper

  4. Seriously don't care... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and the reasons are multiple... - I don't own stock in Apple, its over priced anyway for a consumer electronics company. - Steve Jobs wouldn't give a crap if I was dying, nor would I get press for my health issues. - The market knows he is not the messiah, and Apple as a mega corp will continue on with the wisdom of many other vested parties. - Health issues should be private, kept private and not trivialized by news media. - Respect the privacy of others, too many people in the media don't. and the list goes on and one. Just make it a non story by wishing him the best and in the afterlife and if he is reborn he is more than a toad or troll for his massive good deeds to the people he has destroyed and belittled.

    1. Re:Seriously don't care... by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Serious non-story/invasion of privacy/looking at a train wreck sorta dynamic in play.

    2. Re:Seriously don't care... by scubamage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention he wasn't the genius behind Apple. Steve Wozniak was. In fact in numerous interviews about all Steve Jobs had a hand in in actually designing the original Apple computers was insisting that the power supply be a certain color for aesthetics. The real work was done by a man whom half the nation probably has no idea exists.

    3. Re:Seriously don't care... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Apple is one of the few tech companies that are NOT overpriced. Given their revenue and profits, the market value for Apple is just on par with any industrial company. Geeeez.

    4. Re:Seriously don't care... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2

      Not to mention he wasn't the genius behind Apple. Steve Wozniak was. In fact in numerous interviews about all Steve Jobs had a hand in in actually designing the original Apple computers was insisting that the power supply be a certain color for aesthetics. The real work was done by a man whom half the nation probably has no idea exists.

      Woz is the genius behind the original Apple products from decades past, and Jobs is the genius behind the consumer electronics and publishing juggernaut that Apple is today.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    5. Re:Seriously don't care... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

      Yes, Apple I/][/][+ were act ONE. Act II as I recall was the //c (response to Osbourne and others), /// to the business market, GS for the media home market, and of course Mac/Lisa and more Mac crap than you can toss a stick at for Act III. Act IV was of course what we have now, the music distribution company that played the Music Industry like a fiddle. IBM came and went, and now came again with software mostly and big business focus. But IBM is so much more than just that, with research (which Apple tossed in the restructure and resurrection of Apple by the Steve) in the billions. Apple does one thing well now, they make shiny toys for big and little boys. It works, and they are #1 in the world as a result. Woz was the heart and soul of the engineering, SJ was and maybe still is the heart and soul of the massive marketing and design (esthetics) effort. This topic has been discussed for decades, and its now time to wish the design guy good luck. Long live the Woz.

    6. Re:Seriously don't care... by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      Take it from an engineer who's seen lots of fellow engineers try to make start-ups and fail. Having good engineering is not enough. You need good engineering and good marketing. Woz was the engineering genius. Jobs was the marketing genius. Without either, Apple would not be where it is today.

    7. Re:Seriously don't care... by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Woz was the technical genius who put the parts together to make the new product simple enough to be useful to millions.

      Jobs is the one who ensured millions understood why it was useful.

      History is littered with people who thought you could be Apple by skimping on either of those talents.

    8. Re:Seriously don't care... by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      Woz is responsible for Apple's success? Right. And Sputnik bankrupted the Soviet Union.

      He left in '87. Apple's real success wouldn't come for another 15 years.

    9. Re:Seriously don't care... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I don't own stock in Apple, its over priced anyway for a consumer electronics company [...] Health issues should be private, kept private and not trivialized by news media. - Respect the privacy of others, too many people in the media don't

      The two are tied more closely than you think. Info on Jobs' health is necessary for Apple shareholders. Unlike just about every other company out there, Apple does not pay dividends. All that profit Apple makes? The shareholders see none of it. Zero. Zilch. The entirety of Apple's stock valuation is based on how much people think it'll go up or down in the future, not on how much profit they make. So Job's health is a huge factor in Apple's stock price. And I would argue that since Jobs himself made it this way, that the shareholders have a right to know the status of his health. When you buy Apple stock, you aren't buying a piece of the company. You're buying a piece of the brand, which derives most of its value from Jobs as a salesman.

    10. Re:Seriously don't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tim Cook is the genius behind Apple today. Supply chain, manufacturing and market share.

    11. Re:Seriously don't care... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The real work was done by a man whom half the nation probably has no idea exists.

      It's worse than that. The real work was done by a man whom most will know best for appearing on Dancing with the Stars and dating Kathy Griffin.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Seriously don't care... by Americano · · Score: 1

      So, let's assume you are in a key engineering role at your publicly traded company. Does the press and the public then have a "right" to any private data about you they wish to get their hands on? After all, you're a critical person at the company, doesn't the public have a _right to know_ whether or not you have the clap? If you have to take an extended absence, it could cause a tremendous disruption in the company's ability to do business!

      If you are buying or selling apple stock based on "how Steve is feeling today," then you're an idiot. What everybody knows: Steve's out of the picture. Might be for a few months, might be for 2 years, might be forever. It doesn't matter WHY he's out, and he hasn't announced any plans to return. So, you base your judgement on the people the company STILL HAS working for it. If you think they have the ability to execute a strong performance over the next few years, then you're happy that their business is sound even without Steve. If you think that Tim Cook and the rest of the crew won't be able to execute, you curb future investments and maybe even move to divest yourself of your current holdings.

      This insistence that "Jobs == Apple" is just a thin excuse for ghoulish voyeurism. If you think that the value of Apple is solely linked to Jobs' brand of charisma, then I doubt you own any Apple stock anyway, and you're not entitled to any information.

    13. Re:Seriously don't care... by stor · · Score: 1

      The Woz seems to be doing alright:

      http://www.woz.org/

      He was one of my personal heroes in the ol' GS days.

      -Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    14. Re:Seriously don't care... by bonch · · Score: 2

      Yeah, let's ignore the whole NeXTStep/iMac/iPod/iPhone/iPad era, shall we? Jobs was interested in creating appliance devices, while Wozniak wanted to continue making geeky, build-your-own-computer kits.

    15. Re:Seriously don't care... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Microsoft didn't want to be Apple. Microsoft wanted to be IBM (at least for desktops), and succeeded, to the point that it almost killed IBM.

      Apple had to be bailed out because of Microsoft's own predatory competitive practices, and because of Sculley, and Spindler and Amelio, three guys who Just Didn't Get It.

      Steve came back and the rest is history.

    16. Re:Seriously don't care... by bonch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft didn't "bail out Apple." Microsoft was being sued by Apple for getting caught stealing QuickTime code in Video For Windows. As part of a settlement deal, Microsoft was required to buy non-voting stock in Apple and ship Office for Mac for a number of years.

      That some people spin it as a benevolent act on Microsoft's part is an interesting twist of the truth considering it was Apple who had Microsoft by the balls.

    17. Re:Seriously don't care... by indiechild · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that Steve Jobs isn't so much the marketing genius -- he's the strategic visionary and design genius. Marketing can't polish a turd. Apple is immensely successful because they can combine great engineering with great design. That, and Jobs has a knack for figuring out and defining where the tech world is headed.

      It's a common misconception among "geeks" that Apple is only a marketing company. Their marketing is low key and understated precisely because the products speak for themselves.

    18. Re:Seriously don't care... by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      and the reasons are multiple...

      - Health issues should be private, kept private and not trivialized by news media.
      - Respect the privacy of others, too many people in the media don't.

      So the health of the President should be kept private? It's not newsworthy? Obviously POTUS and SJ are important on different orders of magnitude, but in the realm of the Consumer Electronics and Computer industries, Jobs is about an important player as there is.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    19. Re:Seriously don't care... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sorry dude. An Apple II+ was very cool, but it wasn't useful until Visicalc.

      Until then it was an educational toy sold into a market that didn't need to be sold. We knew why we wanted an Apple. Because it was better then a TRS-80, Pet, CompuColor etc. Woz made it better, Steve did the necessary business stuff.

      Watch this post bring out a Trash-80 fan. Points if he includes fake key bounce in his post.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:Seriously don't care... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      The market knows he is not the messiah, and Apple as a mega corp will continue on with the wisdom of many other vested parties.

      Seems like you weren't in computing in the '90s. Without Steve, Apple was in pretty bad shape, and slowly working it's way towards irrelevance. Apple was losing ground to Wintel, the clones were on the market, and the company seemed to be fated to fade into a beige oblivion. It was a great time to be a Windows fanboy.

      Steve returned, and with him brought the iMac, OS X replaced the obsolete and horrible OS 9. The iPod came out. Apple shifted to an Intel platform. Apple achieved a kind of dominance and success that surprised a lot of us.

      It's a bit of a coin toss what will happen to the company without Steve. I expect it to run on momentum for quite some time, but I could see it just as easily stagnate as it could continue to thrive without a suitable replacement for Steve. All it would take is a single Carley Fiorina at the helm to doom the company.

      I say all this as a guy who has never owned an Apple product.

    21. Re:Seriously don't care... by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      Some P/E ratios:
      Apple = 20
      IBM = 14.19
      Microsoft = 11.53
      Google = 23.77
      Cisco = 14.15
      GE = 18.66
      Ford = 9.54
      Exxon 13.5
      Chevron = 10.25
      Wal-Mart = 13.63

      I'd say Apple and Google are overpriced relative to other large tech companies and industrial (and retail) companies.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    22. Re:Seriously don't care... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Just because you were too dim witted to find a use, doesn't mean there wasn't one,,,several in fact. They where just home grown.

      Also, the TRS_80 was a superior computer. It used memory correctly, didn't have a bunch of artifical limitations.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:Seriously don't care... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Design genius? don't make me laugh.
      He has the rare talent to recognize a design Genius i.e. Jonathan Ivs

      ".. low key and understated..."

      What? WHAT!?! now you are just smoking crack.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Seriously don't care... by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      Their marketing is low key and understated precisely because the products speak for themselves.

      Lol!

      "It's already a revolution, and it's only just begun."

      Understated, my ass.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    25. Re:Seriously don't care... by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Woz hasn't been part of Apple since 1987.

    26. Re:Seriously don't care... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      There is saying "markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent". IIRC shorting is one of the riskiest strategies in this regard.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:Seriously don't care... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Seems like you weren't in computing in the '90s. Without Steve, Apple was in pretty bad shape, and slowly working it's way towards irrelevance. Apple was losing ground to Wintel, the clones were on the market, and the company seemed to be fated to fade into a beige oblivion.

      And yet... Apple's slide to irrelevance was a direct result of Steve Jobs, and his decision in 1985 not to license Mac OS, and to try to out-compete an entire industry.

      Steve returned, and with him brought the iMac, OS X replaced the obsolete and horrible OS 9.

      And yet... Steve's vision of computing, NeXT, had been a dismal failure. It wasn't until the Jobs vision was forced to engage again with the Apple reality he had left behind that OS X began to take form and become a success. And then he repeated the exact same mistake he made with Mac OS, with the iPhone OS. Decided to try and out-compete an entire industry. Only this time he also decided to lock down the platform, intentionally cripple its functionality, and charge people royalties on all software sales. So I think that again, his arrogance will come back to hurt Apple.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    28. Re:Seriously don't care... by defaria · · Score: 1

      Respect is earned - not simply given. Jobs hasn't particularly earned my respect. His public persona is part and particle part of Apple. As such his life, or lack thereof, *is* important and the public and share holders want to know about it. Also, there is no afterlife.

    29. Re:Seriously don't care... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Oh my god.

      The TRS-80 ran memory and data bus right up into the keyboard matrix. Almost completely non-buffered. It was a horrendous kludge in that regard. I wouldn't call the memory mapping of the TRS-80 'correct.' It could only address 16K of memory without using kludge multiplexing.

    30. Re:Seriously don't care... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Because Woz was the kind of guy who could do the whole design using just TTL gates and a little glue logic, then simplify it down to the fewest possible parts. On a dinner napkin.

      The use of the 6502 was a horrendous choice, it's the 8 bit chip with the worst architecture of the possible parts they had to pick from. But it was cheap and easier to sample at the time.

    31. Re:Seriously don't care... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      You are confusing marketing with sales.

      Marketing is about coming up with a product that the market wants. Sales is about telling everyone your product exists.

    32. Re:Seriously don't care... by Pierre-Arnaud · · Score: 1

      Yes he was. The genius of Steve Jobs is to give a direction to geniuses like Woz. Without a Jobs telling them how to focus their minds, these people tend to fool around mounted on a Segway, designing toasters for Phillips, or writing half-baked code for advertising companies disguised as tech ones.

    33. Re:Seriously don't care... by scubamage · · Score: 1

      He still is a personal hero of mine. My girlfriend got me an autographed copy of the Apple I schematic. It's hung on the wall in my office, and gives me inspiration when I need it. The thing is a work of art.

    34. Re:Seriously don't care... by scubamage · · Score: 1

      16k, heck, that's more memory than anyone ever needs.

    35. Re:Seriously don't care... by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I have to give that to you. As an engineer, I tend to go into new technology with childlike glee, with only "SHINY!!!!" echoing through my brain. I suppose without my manager to direct me I'd wreak indescribable havok :)

    36. Re:Seriously don't care... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Woz hasn't been part of Apple since 1987.

      Not true. Woz said just a couple weeks ago that he still gets a small paycheck and has a key card. Sounds like an employee to me.

      http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/the-engadget-show-017-steve-wozniak-sony-ngp-playstation-ph/

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    37. Re:Seriously don't care... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      For Act IV, he copied Palm's touch phones.

      OK, what?

      I mean, I liked PalmOS quite a bit back in the day - and I still use a PalmOS Treo...

      But what aspects of Palm phones did Apple ever copy? PalmOS pretty much just used the touch-screen as a mouse, expected you to operate it with a stylus. It wasn't until after iPhone that Palm started in with WebOS and made phones with a touchscreen UI meant to be operated without a stylus...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    38. Re:Seriously don't care... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You are confusing marketing with sales.

      Marketing is about coming up with a product that the market wants. Sales is about telling everyone your product exists.

      You're confusing the terms yourself. A big part of marketing is getting the word out about the product. Sales is typically focused on closing the deal.

  5. TLDR: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Long story short, Satan has come to collect his part of the agreement.

    Posted anon, cause apple fanbois gave up their sense of humor in exchange for shiny things.

    1. Re:TLDR: by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Thank you for bringing a smile to my morning.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  6. Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by nairnr · · Score: 1

    Any company that requires a specific individual to inspire confidence is, by default, in trouble. Few companies are in the position that Apple is in. How many CEO's could you name? Apple needs to get beyond the cult of leadership that currently surrounds them. I am sure that we still see similar product advances whether he is there as the pitchman or not.

    1. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by SWad · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the fact that investors are worried about one man's health instead of the actual product should tell you something.

    2. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

      What "The Steve" has done is a legion of zealots and religion behind him. That is much like what you can say about Jesus and Buddha and others, but only in the modern day (which has a little weight, but not much). He is loved and hated, for the right and wrong reasons. He polarizes, which to me is not a unifying thing. Personally I don't see SJ any better or worse than the Bill, or the Balmer, or the XYZ exec that you too can name by first, last or nick. One that comes to mind is Monkey Boy, but why bother.

    3. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, they have the second highest market cap of any company in the world, they must be doing something right.

      Also I think I could name the CEO of most major tech companies. Jobs is definitely the most iconic, but there are plenty of other iconic people in the field.

      If Jobs does pass or is forced to retire (and I hope he doesn't), it will be an interesting opportunity for Apple. Jobs runs the company with an iron fist. His style is "my way or the highway". On one hand he's been in the captain's seat when his company has done some really great things (NeXTStep, OSX), and on the other some really terrible things (iOS). The consistent thing is that everything Apple is locked down. That might change if Jobs is no longer at the wheel.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by Americano · · Score: 1

      He "polarizes" neckbeards and contrarians who are rooting to see the top dog fail.

      I doubt you could find too many people outside of your insular little community of slashdotters who could be arsed to have much of an opinion of "Steve Jobs, the guy." They may say, "I love the stuff that company puts out," or "I don't see the big deal about this iPhone whatsit," but there's not a lot of "polarization" when it comes to Steve. The strong negatives seem localized to FOSS zealots (speaking of religion...) and contrarian people who are upset because Apple is popular, and so it's just another thing that "all the sheeple" fall for.

    5. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by fwarren · · Score: 1

      Yes, that Apple has moved into a market where complete "generations" of devices move in 6 to 12 month cycles. Without the proper vision you can own the market today, and be a has been in 2 to 3 years.

      Steve Jobs has had the knack of being able to put the X on the spot for what people will want to pay money for next year. He has pretty much hit the nail on the head 10 times in 10 years. He is the face of Apple. He may not have stared in the "I am a Mac" commercials. But as far as investors are concerned, he is the star they are betting on. The man who can put an X on a calendar a year from now so the engineers and designers know what to make. The stock holders of Apple depend on this skill.

      There is no one else at Apple that has the power or vision. Apple can find a dozen people who can ride the wave as a CEO for the next 3 or 4 years and maybe even a few who can flog a dead horse longer than that. The company is going to lose some value when Steve passes or it is clear he won't be coming back. Maybe Apple will find someone who can get the job done. But till that person has a track record the company is going to take a hit. If they can't find that person, they will really take a hit. So far, Apple without Jobs is a computer company that exists to serve one purpose and one purpose only. Prove to the DOJ that Microsoft is not a monopoly controlling the entire PC market.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    6. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Can you back any of this up? Because I don't see any evidence that Jobs gives the company much in the way of highly specific direction.

      It seems to me that the iPhone, iPad, iPod, x86 architecture Mac, and countless other things would have happened had Jobs been at the helm or not.

      iOS likely would be just as intuitive, and just as locked down Jobs or no Jobs.

      I doubt the app store was his idea and his idea alone.

      I just don't see why he will make or break the company. Can you be more specific? I'm just speculating, and perhaps I'm wrong.

    7. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by multi+io · · Score: 1

      Well, nobody outside Apple knows for sure, but how do you think e.g. the original iPhone happened? This was truly an epochal device that has set standards for practically all smartphones that came afterwards. From my perspective (and I'm no Apple user at all), essentially 90% of the design principles of ALL modern smartphones -- the clear focus on touch, the "physical" UI, the focus on detail, scrolling without scrollbars, zoom&pan, end-to-end integration of hardware and software -- can be traced back to the iPhone 1. This is not something that "design by committee" would normally come up with. I would think that very few people within Apple are directly responsible for these things, and without them, there would be no iPhone at all (at least no one resembling what we have today), and the whole market would look much different. I would think that Steve Jobs is at least part of that group of very few people responsible.

    8. Re:Apple needs to stand on it's own feet by shallot · · Score: 1

      From my perspective (and I'm no Apple user at all), essentially 90% of the design principles of ALL modern smartphones -- the clear focus on touch, the "physical" UI, the focus on detail, scrolling without scrollbars, zoom&pan, end-to-end integration of hardware and software -- can be traced back to the iPhone 1. This is not something that "design by committee" would normally come up with. I would think that very few people within Apple are directly responsible for these things [...]

      Yes, well, all that is something "design by movie" could come up with. Minority Report - 2002 -> five years -> iPhone - 2007 Clearly the fact that they achieved these features in an attractive format and with a bearable price tag is an important milestone. But let's not get too excited about these ideas being devoid of design by committee, because it doesn't really take a wizard to figure out that emulating a human-to-machine interface that was successfully shown all over the big screens, all over the world - is a potentially very profitable idea.

  7. Re:Of course he is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't accept that I'm not immortal until after I die.

    In the meantime. It's fun being immortal!

  8. Stock by scubamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Man, i may dump my savings into apple stock once it bottoms out after his death. There's going to be a massive unloading, we all know it.

    1. Re:Stock by blair1q · · Score: 1

      So short it now. Or buy puts.

      Make money both ways.

    2. Re:Stock by geekoid · · Score: 1

      short it for when? do you know when he is going to die?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Stock by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can hold a short for as long as you can cover your loses.

      You are thinking of a put option. With that you not only need to guess the date but how far down you expect the stock to drop.

      A review of Put option premiums on apple could give us a 'market forecast' for Job's death. Looking at http://finance.yahoo.com/q/op?s=AAPL&m=2011-05 I see call option premiums dropping and puts raising. No action to speak of more the $100 out of the money. Option premiums go up for out of the money options as they go further out, but that is expected.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Stock by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      He has the look of someone who has been touched by the Grim Reaper. I say he has weeks, maybe months, not years.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    5. Re:Stock by indeciso · · Score: 1

      That's the main problem about stocks, you can never tell when they've actually bottomed out.

    6. Re:Stock by dwightk · · Score: 1

      there's no limit to the amount of money you can lose shorting a stock.

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    7. Re:Stock by blair1q · · Score: 1

      This is true, which is why you don't let it climb more than a few % before re-evaluating your theory of the stock's future.

      Think of it this way: since part of your short bet involves predicting that the company may go out of business entirely, your time horizon is much shorter than if you'd made a long bet expecting it to last forever. Because it's shorter, your time horizon on the losing side of your short bet has to be shorter than if you had made a long bet.

      You can also see it as setting your stop limits closer to your entry point because your gains are limited to the current price.

      It's a combination of both.

      Going long is shooting a rocket into space. Going short is throwing a hand-grenade in a closed building. Your choice of where to stand and where to run in case of malfunction is more critical in the latter case.

  9. A pic here by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://static2.businessinsider.com/image/4d5c75d8cadcbbc41b160000/steve-jobs-sick.jpg

    There's also a sensationalist headline over here:

    http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/02/17/steve-jobs-may-have-just-six-weeks-to-live-receiving-treatment/

    The Daily Mail spoke to Dr Jerome Spunberg, a certified Oncologist, who said: âoeMr Jobs is most likely getting outpatient chemotherapy at Stanford because the cancer has recurred.â

    Another consultant, Dr. Gabe Mirkin, a physician with over fourty years experience, said: âoeHe is terminal. What you are seeing is extreme muscle wasting from calorie depravation, most likely caused by cancer. He has no muscle left in his buttocks, which is the last place to go. He definitely appears to be in the terminal stages of his life from these photos. I would be surprised if he weighed more than 130lb.â

    The National Enquirer, who initially reported the news today (to be published tomorrow), talked to critical-care physician Dr. Samuel Jacobson, who said, âoeJudging from the photos, he is close to terminal. I would say he has six weeks.â That said, given the reliability of The National Enquirer, waiting for further news before jumping to conclusions is advised.

    Weâ(TM)ve done a little digging into Dr. Samuel Jacobson. Jacobson appears to be a Florida based pulmonologist (breathing doctor) â" not Oncologist. Which would naturally make you wonder just how qualified he is to diagnose someone via a photo, especially outside of his speciality.

    1. Re:A pic here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's two physicians who need to be slapped by the medical board. Hard.

      First, you don't discuss someones health status/information with *anyone* unless you have the patient's consent.
      Second, even a 1st year med student knows that you never give a diagnosis unless you've actually examined the patient.

    2. Re:A pic here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We are all terminal.

    3. Re:A pic here by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Hair's too long in the picture.

      The car he's standing next to is a shitty Honda, not his Mercedes.

      There's a picture of him at dinner last night with Obama and Zuckerberg and other zillionaires. He looks better than the Enquirer's picture.

      The Enquirer has a picture of someone who vaguely resembles Jobs.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  10. Why is the media following the National Enquirer? by hellfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The National Enquirer talks about running photos of Steve, and the entire news media gets a hard on and starts running stories on this. Has the media degraded so far that we are now counting the National Enquirer as a reliable news source?

    The only people who are escalating the health worries here are the media itself to push for circulation. It's not news, it's bullshit. Thanks for contributing to the bullshit, Timothy.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  11. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They scooped the John Edwards story.

  12. Lets take stock of the situation by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Man, i may dump my savings into apple stock once it bottoms out after his death. There's going to be a massive unloading, we all know it.

    Good point, some investors will dump stock the moment he dies. Buy then, and sell in the next year or two, when his actual influence filters out of the company and apple reverts to being just another mega-corp.

    If you were really the gambling sort of vulture, you might even short some stock now and hope he is unhealthy as he looks.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Lets take stock of the situation by tgeller · · Score: 1

      Or you could skip a step and just short it.

      --
      Tom Geller
  13. Why this matters by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This item has only been up a few minutes, and already a lot of people are asking why this matters, why they should care. Here's why:

    If you use a Mac, you should care about this.

    Steve Jobs is unquestionably the driving force behind Apple. His return to Apple as the iCEO, followed by the introduction of new streamlined iMacs, the iPod, ... all demonstrated that Steve had returned to make Apple's mark on the industry. How many of the general population - not to mention us IT geeks - have an iPod? I look around my office and see high level executives using iPads. Steve made these a success. The same technology in a different package - maybe even the same package but a different salesman - wouldn't be as popular.

    Pundits, fans, and teh haters all pay attention when Steve makes a new announcement of any new Apple product. That's the presence Steve brings to the game. He's like a tiny god. Love him or hate him, you can't deny he understands the market, and how to drive new products to get at that "I want it" mentality.

    But unfortunately, Steve's success is a double-edged sword. He's the driving force behind Apple. He's also the driving force behind Apple. There was no succession planning here. His second in command isn't well known. He's not the face of Apple. I wonder who will follow him.

    I wish Steve the best, and if he's able to return as CEO, I think that would be great. But if he doesn't ... look for Apple's stock to plummet. Even if the new guy has all kinds of bright ideas, I don't think he'll have the same presence as Steve, and won't be able to garner the same attention for the company. Apple has lots of new items in the pipeline, I'm sure, so the new guy's leadership won't truly be tested/visible for another 12 to 18 months. In that time, he needs to make his own mark, or Apple will quickly find itself on the sidelines trying to catch up to the rest of the market - rather than leading the market.

    That's what has investors worried. And that is why you should care about this item.

    Disclaimer: I am not an Apple fan, but I work in IT.

    1. Re:Why this matters by corbettw · · Score: 1

      No, but maybe your next one never exists in the first place because the company went out of business.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Why this matters by geekoid · · Score: 1

      IF they next CEO gives Jonathan Ive the freedom and respect Steve does, they may be fine.

      But yeah, it's a real concern for shareholders.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Why this matters by nomadic · · Score: 1

      So you might have to buy a computer that isn't incredibly overpriced?

    4. Re:Why this matters by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most likely the one who steps up will fail exactly because he's not Steve Jobs, no matter what he does. What Apple has done is to overcome the catch 22 of users and content because Jobs has a following of rabid fans and loyal developers big enough to kick start any market. It's like setting off a nuke, you need critical mass or you get a fizzle.

      Jobs has the customers go "yeah" then the developers go "yeah" then the tech press goes "yeah" and the cheers runs in circles. The next guy will have the customers go "ummmmmm" then the developers go "ummmmmm" then the tech press goes "ummmmmmm" and the doubt runs in circles. Apple can spiral down just as quick as they've spiraled up.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Why this matters by Tapewolf · · Score: 1

      So you might have to buy a computer that isn't incredibly overpriced?

      That's not much consolation if you need to run Mac software on it.

    6. Re:Why this matters by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Apple sees to it that Mac application software goes obsolete with each major revision of their systems.

      So maybe you'll have to buy all new for full price instead of the upgrade version for a 40% price, but Mac users are used to spending and spending and spending. They expect to be forced to buy new software much more often than the 'doze crowd.

    7. Re:Why this matters by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You're on apple.slashdot.org.

      The old slashdot was from before there was an apple.slashdot.org. Ten years ago Apple was considered a big joke by those of us who weren't part of a tiny minority.

    8. Re:Why this matters by indeciso · · Score: 1

      For sure Jobs has been key for current Apple success, but I think that nowadays the company is mature enough to go on without him. Now Apple has all it lacked in 1997: market leadership, worldwide notoriety, powerful marketing, know-how, and an army of talented developers (both indoors or outdoors).

      Steve Jobs led Apple through the right path, but that's far from saying that he's created all Apple's successful products single-handledly.

    9. Re:Why this matters by Alanis+Morissette · · Score: 1

      Well, I've seen this mentioned a few times but surely you should provide some evidence as to why you think there is no succession plan. I mean apple is after all famously secretive!

  14. The National Enquirer? by deathtopaulw · · Score: 1

    Need I say more?

    1. Re:The National Enquirer? by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      They've had their crazy stories, but the National Enquirer has broken several stories that the mainstream media figured out later... Just a few:
      - Bristol Palin's pregnancy
      - John Edwards' affair
      - Jesse Jackson fathering a child out of wedlock
      - The first anthrax attack
      - Found the murderer of Ennis Cosby
      - Lewinsky scandal
      - Finding pictures of OJ Simpson wearing the shoes he denied owning in court
      - Rush Limbaugh/Oxycontin scandal

      Need I go on?

    2. Re:The National Enquirer? by mycroft822 · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate to say it, you shouldn't count them as completely unreliable. They were the first to uncover the John Edwards scandal. IIRC, it took the major media outlets a few months to finally pick up on it.

    3. Re:The National Enquirer? by QuincyDurant · · Score: 1

      They have good, well-paid reporters with an army of fact-checkers and lawyers behind them. The format, and the pub's history, reminds one of "wild hogs ate my baby" journalism, but these days, they're as careful with facts as most newspapers. The headlines and photos--that's a different matter. But if the text says he was in the cancer ward, he probably was, or else someone has made an honest mistake. The company got sick of paying hundreds of millions to movie stars and no longer prints malicious stories with reckless disregard for the truth.

      Why would a good professional writer work for them? Why would a good, professional programmer work for Microsoft?

  15. Consider the Source by SavoWood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the pictures come from The National Enquirer, you really need to consider the source. Also, the doctor making this prognosis was doing so based on the pictures. Didn't we all jump on the idiot in Congress a few years ago for diagnosing that woman in Florida using a short video clip?

    Let's take this to a conspiracy level and say people are putting out this news to get the stock price to drop a bit so they can snap it up and wait for the retraction of the article and the stock goes back up, they make a pretty penny.

    --
    Plant a tree in a developing country.
    1. Re:Consider the Source by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      If the pictures someone posted above are the ones the Enquirer are basing the article off of, he sure as hell doesn't look good. I certainly wouldn't say 6 weeks to terminal, even if I were an oncologist with expertise in the field. They aren't basing the speculation off the pictures, they're basing it off pictures from a couple months ago compared to pictures now. Suddenly dropping 40-50 lbs over the course of a few weeks wreaks havoc on your body just by itself, and that is what the pictures appear to show. Without the comparison pictures he could just be a very frail older man, but if you compare them to what Jobs looked like a few months ago... well, let's just say that I wish him the best of luck, because at a minimum it appears he's having a very rough time.

    2. Re:Consider the Source by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      Or they're shorting the stock right now, making lots of money as we speak. With this sort of stock manipulation, you can make money coming and going if you play it right and the people who manipulate stocks this blatantly most certainly know how to play it right.

    3. Re:Consider the Source by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      The Enquirer makes plenty of money paying freelance photographers for pictures of random celebrities and then selling them to the average American. I have significant doubts that they would engage in a risky, easily detected, and highly illegal stock manipulation scheme to make an extra buck on the side.

    4. Re:Consider the Source by nytmare · · Score: 1

      Does the article writer have more info than you do looking at the rear end of some old guy? Bet not.

      Therefore that's not Steve Jobs in the pictures.

  16. Poor Apple Stockholders! Waa. Waa. Waa. by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Poor Apple Stockholders. Steve Jobs is sick and all they worry about is pictures of their control-freak "sell the sizzle" CEO not looking well in the National Enquirer when he has pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, this is the kind of thing that happens when you have a celebrity CEO.

    Personally, I am surprised this hasn't happened until now. I guess they don't have Michael Jackson to write about anymore and have to branch out.

  17. pics by nomadic · · Score: 1

    "Supposedly the National Enquirer is set to run pictures of Jobs with him looking frail and gaunt." Uhhh, TFA has pictures of him looking frail and gaunt. Look at the October 2010 pic on the TFA, he looks terrible. I wish him luck, though at this point I hope he realizes there are more important things to deal with than work and takes a long break.

  18. Netcraft confirms it: Steve Jobs is dying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doctors of Medicinal Wizardry at Netcraft Sanitoriums have determined that Steve Jobs is dying. His slow lapse into death is due to a lack of Ego, which he has depleted to run Apple Enterprises. It was considered giving him a shot of Humility (which has has no natural reserve of) as an experimental treatment, but past review of his life has determined that this would be of no effect. Apple fanbois are quietly assembling at Cupertino to prepare for the inevitable deathwatch.

    1. Re:Netcraft confirms it: Steve Jobs is dying. by Clsid · · Score: 1

      You are an a-hole. I don't find this funny at all.

    2. Re:Netcraft confirms it: Steve Jobs is dying. by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Those replying with negative reactions to this need to learn some damned history. This is about the best reply that a non-story like "steve jobs might be dying!" deserves. If you don't find it funny you are twelve years old and haven't been following the computer industry press since the 1980s.

      My hat off to you, AC.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  19. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by corbettw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't forget that it was The National Enquirer who broke the story on the Edwards baby and affair. They've established some cred on investigative journalism over the last several years.

    I'm not saying they're right here, I'm just saying it's foolish to discount them out of hand.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  20. Re:I hate Apple by blair1q · · Score: 1

    There's a difference between being trendy, and creating the trend.

    And it's not even a little bit subtle.

  21. Engineers and designers are the real geniuses by perpenso · · Score: 2

    Not to mention he wasn't the genius behind Apple. Steve Wozniak was. In fact in numerous interviews about all Steve Jobs had a hand in in actually designing the original Apple computers was insisting that the power supply be a certain color for aesthetics. The real work was done by a man whom half the nation probably has no idea exists.

    Woz is the genius behind the original Apple products from decades past, and Jobs is the genius behind the consumer electronics and publishing juggernaut that Apple is today.

    Not really. The real geniuses are the engineers and the designers. The difference between the Apple II days and now is that decades ago the engineers and designers were far more visible or well known. The Apple II and Woz being at one extreme, however the original Mac had the designers/engineers names molded into the interior of the case. Jobs, then and now, stands on the shoulders of the engineers and designers.

    Best wishes for Jobs. Hopefully he just has to slow down and relax.

  22. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    You mean more stuff that was private and had no business on the news?

    Oh noes he likes to nail broads! This was a problem for him and his wife, not the public at large.

  23. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because the National Enquirer, if you haven't noticed, is one of the most fact checked news outlets out there nowadays, especially with regards to things involving celeberties and popular people. They are up for a pulitzer prize for their John Edwards piece, and have made numerous other scoops. They scooped the Limbaugh painkillers story, the "Dog" / ni**er story, some alledge that they mistook Jackson's drug addiction for an illness, so they called his death too within a month... they busted Tiger's Extramarital affair two months in advance...

    These guys are good. If they have a sourced story on Steve Jobs saying he's dying of cancer, I'd bet around $300 that Jobs does die of it within 6 to 10 weeks.

  24. The doctor isn't even an oncologist by hellfire · · Score: 1

    I wish I could find a source for where I read this, but the doctor looking at the pictures isn't even an oncologist, he's in sports medicine! There's the NE for you.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  25. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by blair1q · · Score: 1

    The thing about those Enquirer photos is they're from 6 months ago.

  26. Wall street not worried by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Apple is one of the few tech companies that are NOT overpriced. Given their revenue and profits, the market value for Apple is just on par with any industrial company. Geeeez.

    True but perception and fear can cause a bit of short term volatility.

    Contrary to what the summary claims investors are not generally worried, AAPLE was down only 1.3% today. They realize that Steve has picked and trained a very strong management team, a team that proved itself during his previous absence.

    Best wishes for Jobs. Hopefully he just has to slow down and relax.

  27. The Elvis of the personal computer by Puzzles · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs is the Elvis of the personal computer. Will people claim that Jobs lives after he dies?

    But unlike Elvis, all these stock fears seem to suggest he is worth more alive than dead. Therefore, if Jobs' possible passing is being kept secret for financial reasons, then shame on anyone involved in the secrecy--it actually does not speak on the value of his life but that of Apple. Rather, if his possible passing is being kept secret for privacy reasons and respect for him and his family, I am as well as everyone else should be satisfied and content.

    I have much more respect for Steve Jobs than I do with Apple. Notice how I make a distinction between the two. Not enough people do, unfortunately. And if we were purposely led to believe that there is no Apple without Steve Jobs, well shame on those people who pushed that idea.

    And if Jobs was part of that idea, then perhaps the best thing he can do is say goodbye and resign before he passes, not the other way around.

    I have no interest in using or developing for Apple products, but I hope Jobs recovers. This is all being played like a game of poker: the very notion that this is being kept secret is more or less a good sign, meant to keep others from folding their hands in the hope that they have a good hand (which can be likened to Steve returning).

    --
    "So don't get programmed by anybody but yourself" --Bill S. Preston, Esquire
    1. Re:The Elvis of the personal computer by BatGnat · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs is the Elvis of the personal computer.

      Either stop taking the drugs....
      Or start taking the ones your supposed too....

    2. Re:The Elvis of the personal computer by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      The older Elvis got, the fatter he got. Elvis was also the most ground-breaking early in his career, resting on his laurels at the end.

      If anything, Jobs is the anti-Elvis.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  28. Transplant => doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why would Jobs need a liver transplant, unless the cancer had metastasized there? And if the cancer is metastatic, then it spells certain doom. Merely replacing his liver isn't going to eliminate the cancer (and be curative), because the cancer has certainly spread elsewhere in his body, too.

  29. You are clearly an engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Engineers are geniuses at engineering. Marketers are geniuses at marketing, a skill which, being social and aesthetic, engineers generally fail at.

    Just because I don't box and don't like Mike Tyson doesn't mean Mike Tyson wasn't an amazing boxer.

    1. Re:You are clearly an engineer by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      You are quite right: they are two different tasks with two different sets of skills. One cannot live long without the other. Engineers must never give into the conceit of amazing technology you can't sell, and marketers must never fall into the conceit of amazing promotion that isn't backed up by performance.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:You are clearly an engineer by mirix · · Score: 1

      Just because I don't have and don't like cancer doesn't mean cancer isn't amazingly effective.

      Marketing is similar. An effective scourge, but a scourge nonetheless.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:You are clearly an engineer by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      To be more specific, too: engineers shouldn't work on solutions for problems (or desires) people don't have. Good marketing isn't just about promotion: it's also about the research in understanding the best place to focus your business's strengths, in a way that will make a profit.

      To play with your sig: marketing people point out opportunities, engineers fulfill them.

    4. Re:You are clearly an engineer by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Engineers are geniuses at engineering. Marketers are geniuses at marketing, a skill which, being social and aesthetic, engineers generally fail at.

      Just because I don't box and don't like Mike Tyson doesn't mean Mike Tyson wasn't an amazing boxer.

      Tyson was a pioneer. Traditionalists always insist that boxing is a sport in which people are supposed to bludgeon each other with their fists... Tyson broadened our horizons, showed us how the time-honored sport could be enhanced through the use of teeth-based attacks.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    5. Re:You are clearly an engineer by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Just because I don't have and don't like cancer doesn't mean cancer isn't amazingly effective.

      And people say cancer isn't funny...

      Damn you, Bruce McCulloch!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  30. Re:I hate Apple by thechink · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am still bothered by the way he pretended to invent multitasking instead of just admitting that he was catching up to Android,

    Where did he ever say that? When he introduced multitasking for the iPhone he said that Apple was "late to the party".

    Seriously I really think Apple-haters like to make things like this up or seem unable to separate marketing-speeak from reality.

  31. Apple products may finally improve. by cstanley8899 · · Score: 1

    I can only wonder what kind of product improvements may actually take place once Steve Jobs passes. Blu-Ray, mice that don't cramp your hands, iMacs that are not just silver... Once your overbearing father goes bye bye then a whole new world opens up.

    1. Re:Apple products may finally improve. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2

      Are you seriously saying that it'll be great when a man dies because you prefer a slightly different type of gadget?

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:Apple products may finally improve. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, finally someone gets it~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Re:I hate Apple by t2t10 · · Score: 1

    Android has had proxy support since the first release. You set it under the access point.

    Now, what's pretty important in a business phone is that your VPN doesn't randomly reset to an unencrypted connection, which, sadly, it does on iPhone.

  33. Are we sure it is Steve Jobs in the photos? by The+Optimizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The guys over at jalopnik aren't so sure, unless he's traded in his Mercedes SL55 AMG for a 10+ year old Honda Civic...

    http://jalopnik.com/#!5763321/cmon-does-the-national-enquirer-really-think-steve-jobs-owns-a-honda

    1. Re:Are we sure it is Steve Jobs in the photos? by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      He's also apparently scheduled to have dinner with Obama. It is unlikely that the meeting would be scheduled if he was that close to death.

      http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/02/steve-jobs-and-eric-schmidt-to-meet-with-president-obama-thursday-in-san-francisco.html

    2. Re:Are we sure it is Steve Jobs in the photos? by dunezone · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Honda Civic was a way of throwing reporters off?

  34. Haven't you heard? by denzacar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe he's just a guy with cancer who doesn't want to spend his last days dying in the public eye while they discuss how to best profit from his passing?

    You forfeit your privacy rights when you sign that "rich AND famous" contract.
    And a part of your human rights goes down the drain when you turn yourself into a brand.
    You don't get to be in the spotlight and not take in some heat from the lights.

    Think about it. Would Woz, in a similar situation, be facing the same privacy problems as Jobs? How about Paul Allen?

    That is why I keep my wishes simple. I just want to be rich. Someone else can be famous. E.g. the getaway driver.
    He can have all the fame in the world as long as I'm free to keep and use the money. In fact...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Haven't you heard? by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      Think about it. Would Woz, in a similar situation, be facing the same privacy problems as Jobs? How about Paul Allen?

      Good point, though the general public doesn't know who they are, so there wouldn't be nearly the media coverage. A better analogy would be Gates. He doesn't have anything to do with the day-to-day at MS, so the public doesn't have a right to knowledge about his health, and by my view would be entitled to all the privacy most people are asking us to give Jobs. But Jobs' has shown that without him Apple falters, and with him it soars. The likelihood of his being involved in the day to day operations is paramount to the investing decisions of millions of people.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    2. Re:Haven't you heard? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      I wasn't referring to the simple interest by the shareholders. They don't usually get their information from National Enquirer. Or at least they don't look for it there.

      I was referring to the kind of recognition that results from chasing that celebrity status usually held by rock stars and other "celebrities".
      You want fame? Well guess what - one of the main causes of fame are the paparazzi.

      Bill Gates would have similar problems. Being notoriously rich (richest in the world more than once) buys you that too.
      Summer of 2009. he came privately, unannounced, with family, to Croatia for about two hours. Did the media miss that? Not a chance.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:Haven't you heard? by Varkias · · Score: 1

      You forfeit your privacy rights when you sign that "rich AND famous" contract. And a part of your human rights goes down the drain when you turn yourself into a brand. You don't get to be in the spotlight and not take in some heat from the lights.

      Really? I guess you have no problem when people want to know more about what happened to Lara Logan after her sexually assault in Egypt, because you know she's a public figure, rich AND famous. Disgusting! From my perspective both of them are people FIRST and public figures second, they deserve privacy at times like this. Comments like this just sound like sour grapes to me.

    4. Re:Haven't you heard? by ehack · · Score: 1

      Paul Allen had Hodgkins Lymphoma.

      --
      This is not a signature.
  35. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Why is it that the National Enquirer gets the third degree, and yet other media like NBC, CBS, New York Times, and so on get a free pass? What does it say about them that they look to the National Enquirer to lead? Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  36. Karma be damned... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    The smart market knows he is the messiah

    He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  37. Re:I hate Apple by bonch · · Score: 2

    I am still bothered by the way he pretended to invent multitasking instead of just admitting that he was catching up to Android

    He never "pretended to invent multitasking." Holy shit is there a flood of anonymous anti-Apple trolls in this article, even more than usual.

  38. Steve Jobs Compared with Bill Gates by TheResortManager · · Score: 1

    If only Steve lived his life like Bill Gates...

    Sad.

  39. Re:I hate Apple by bonch · · Score: 1

    He was referring to the way that, instead of fully running in the background, apps submit specialized blocks of background code (using the blocks extension Apple added to C) to be run by the OS. Apps can continue to do specialized tasks in the background, such as playing music, without fully running in the background and slowing down the phone.

    Nobody was pretending anything was "new"--that's your own invention. No wonder you post anonymously.

  40. Re:Cure For Cancer: Oxygen Therapy, raising body P by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

    Oh good, the crazy bus is here...

  41. Re:Private Lives by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Except Mark Zuckerberg

    He deserves to have every facet of his life known and subjected to Liking or DisLiking.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  42. Apple's next CEO: Timothy Cook by Animats · · Score: 2

    Apple's #2 manager is Timothy Cook, Apple's chief operating officer. He's a cost control and outsourcing guy. He came from Compaq, where he turned them from a manufacturer into a distributor of products made offshore. That's what he did at Apple, too - closed all the Apple factories and outsourced manufacturing to FoxConn. He's good at managing low-cost outsourced manufacturing. He's running Apple now, and will probably succeed Jobs.

    Apple will survive. Cook will hire some low-cost design firm in Beijing to do the next products. There's good design coming out of Beijing now. Check out PER design group's work. FoxConn in Shenzen already does the manufacturing. All Apple US has to do is manage the deals with other parties. Cupertino will probably be downsized to a marketing and IP rights organization.

    1. Re:Apple's next CEO: Timothy Cook by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he was a real winner for Compaq.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Apple's next CEO: Timothy Cook by stiller · · Score: 1

      Since Apple's product design and development units seem to be their biggest assets, why the hell would they want to outsource those? Outsourcing manufacturing makes sense in a lot of cases, outsourcing product innovation is just a really bad idea. Basically, in your scenario, the company would have no added value at all, becoming little more than a patent troll.

  43. We know how sick he is. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Pancreatic cancer is a death sentence. It is extremely rare to express any symptoms at all before the cancer metastatizes.
    Surgery for pancreatic cancer is, in general, palliative.

    Ask an oncologist what the general prognosis is for pancreatic cancer. Go ahead and mention that the patient is a billionaire if you like.

    He's pretty much as sick as a person can get. I have no doubt he is aware of this and doesn't need to be told by a slashdot headline.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  44. Re:Cure For Cancer: Oxygen Therapy, raising body P by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

    I think someone just came off their medication...

  45. Not so yummy apples by Lenardius+VII · · Score: 1

    Seems like an Apple a day doesn't keep the doctor away.

  46. Re:Of course he is dying by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

    True. However, when Jobs goes, whether that be in two weeks or two decades, he will rise again in three days, so let's not be worried.

  47. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it's a Democrat, it's supposed to be a matter of privacy even if they're breaking the law (Bill Clinton and perjury, John Edwards and violating FEC laws by using campaign money to fund his mistress and child, et al). If it's a Republican, it's everyone's business even if no laws were broken (Mark Sanford, Chris Lee, et al).

    Oh, I know, the Rs are hypocrites since they say they believe in something and can't live up to it, so that's why they must be exposed. Ds are off the hook since they don't have a core belief to violate, even if they break the law in the process.

  48. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Which party is trying to stick it's nose in my personal business? Which party is trying to dictate what I can do in the bedroom? Which party is trying to restrict access to birth control? Which party is trying to tell women what they can do with their own bodies? Hint, it sure as shit ain't the democrats.

  49. The problem is that this is our business by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    I wish we lived in a world where Steve Jobs could be left alone and worry about getting better. As much as I hate Apple's arrogance and closed nature, I think we can all recognize the contributions that they have made to our modern world. If it weren't for Apple and Steve Jobs, I'd still be running around with some tiny-screen POS phone rather than the Nexus One. Whether you own Apple products or not, you have probably benefited from their innovations.

    But, unfortunately, we don't live in a world where Steve Jobs can be left alone. We live in a world where many, many investors own a part of Apple, and they have a big stake in the success of the company too. Investors have the right to know what Apple knows about whether Steve Jobs will still be CEO in the immediate future. Steve Jobs is an instrumental part of the company, so it is imperative that the company be open and transparent about the status of their CEO and who will succeed him should he need to step down.

    The personal details of Steve Jobs' health are none of the investor's business. But knowing whether they may need to find a CEO and who that might be is.

    Here's hoping that the rumors are bogus and Steve is on his way to recovery.

    1. Re:The problem is that this is our business by geekoid · · Score: 1

      He can be. It's not like he reads slashdot. He an easily siy in his nice home and relax without ever turning on any news.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    It would have been better for him to get on the ticket as VP first though.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  51. Re:Cure For Cancer: Oxygen Therapy, raising body P by josteos · · Score: 1

    Someone must have cut off his oxygen supply.

    --
    Save the Music; Save the World at http://www.TuneTriever.com (Our latest Android game)
  52. Re:Private Lives by mewsenews · · Score: 1

    Except Mark Zuckerberg He deserves to have every facet of his life known and subjected to Liking or DisLiking.

    I just decided to go to Facebook to see how open Zuckerberg's personal facebook page is. The answer? I can't find his personal Facebook page. You can't "friend" him. He has a "public figure" page where someone posts news snippets and you can "like" it. Hypocrite.

  53. If he had bone-itis by geekoid · · Score: 1

    they could just freeze him for 1000 years.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. Re:Private Lives by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    Screw you. If you don't like Facebook, don't use it. This is nothing more than antagonistic, hypocritical, petty vengeance befitting an angst-ridden prepubescent teenager.

  55. Re:Cure For Cancer: Oxygen Therapy, raising body P by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    That's messy. I always come on my medication.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  56. How is that hypocritical! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I can't find his personal Facebook page. You can't "friend" him. He has a "public figure" page where someone posts news snippets and you can "like" it. Hypocrite.

    How is that hypocritical? It's not like he's forcing every single human to be on Facebook. Everyone has the right to not have a Facebook page, including him.

    Now it might be bad advertising to not use your own product, but the truth is that people use Facebook because they want to, because they want to share all these details that you are so aghast at exposing. It's not hypocritical to provide a service people want while not using it yourself - it would be if he had spoken against something like Facebook, but plainly he has not.

    My guess is that he's actually on Facebook under a pseudonym that just his closest friends know.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How is that hypocritical! by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      He's on facebook under his real name; somebody hacked the privacy settings and leaked a bunch of his stuff once. News of this even made it to slashdot.

    2. Re:How is that hypocritical! by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      How is that hypocritical?

      It's like that picture of a Pepsi driver drinking a Coke. If Facebook is so awesome, why isn't he using it?

    3. Re:How is that hypocritical! by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Only if he were using MySpace.

    4. Re:How is that hypocritical! by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he is/was "Tom" on MySpace?

    5. Re:How is that hypocritical! by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Eh.. just because it's your own awesome product you have to use it? When did that become a rule?

    6. Re:How is that hypocritical! by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      It's not, but if Steve Jobs were to be seen using an Android or Windows 7 phone, what would that say about him? It shows at best that he believes there's a superior product to his own, and at worst he doesn't believe in his product for one reason or another.

  57. You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because unlike with other CxOs Steve Jobs has purposely built a cult of personality around him that will seriously affect the stock.

    That's bullshit. He's already left, the stock took a small dive but is higher than ever now. Most people at this point (except for Apple Haters) are pretty much assuming Jobs is not really coming back.

    The fact is that Apple as entire markets that they drive, Jobs leaving will not affect the momentum of the company for many, many years to come - if ever. Rather that building "a cult of personality" Jobs built an approach to thinking about consumer electronics, and he's shared that with everyone at Apple - as much as anyone could share it.

    You know who would have more impact leaving/being ill than Jobs right now? Ives. Because even with Jobs gone Ives will present a consistency of products such that at first glance you will not even realize Jobs was not involved.

    Between momentum and a stable of people with considerable design and product skills, Apple will do just fine without Jobs.

    The reason why Apple Haters are so insistent that Jobs will be back, is that they will have no-one to attribute success to without Jobs there, will have to actually admit Apple might have built a few products people like to use because they are well designed. To an Apple Hater this is the end times.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      That's rubbish. I hate Apple but that's because I hate Jobs and his fascist tendencies. Apple's products, on the other hand, are top notch. I'd by one if they weren't pushed by an litigious fascist arsehole like Jobs.

      OSX really appeals to me and I suppose iPhones are ok (not really my kind of thing) but I won't ever buy an Apple product because I will not go where I am not free to use the device as I like, develop with whatever tools I like and not have the capricious whim of Jobs decide how or what I can do.

    2. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by tsa · · Score: 2

      People who call other people fascists usually can be ignored. If you don't know what 'fascist' means your opinion is probably not based on anything but gut feeling.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's rubbish. I hate Apple but that's because I hate Jobs and his fascist tendencies.

      So in other words, I label you an Apple Hater, and you claim it's the guy that you say is the whole reason behind Apple's success is what you hate.

      In other words, you are an Apple Hater by your own definition. Not to mention Drama Queen for throwing around the word "fascist".

      I won't ever buy an Apple product because I will not go where I am not free to use the device as I like, develop with whatever tools I like and not have the capricious whim of Jobs decide how or what I can do.

      A common trait of the Apple Hater is the willful ignorance of the reality of Apple gear - I'm an iOS developer, none of what you say is true. They long ago removed the restrictions to not use things like mono or the flash compilers for iPhone development, for example. Jobs doesn't decide what I do with my devices, at all - what's sad is that you are promoting the misunderstanding that is the case.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I sorta see people who call someone else a "hater" and think that's an argument the same way.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    5. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Typical fanboy reaction - label anyone not slotting neatly into your worshipful little reality as a "hater", and deride it as a "meme".

      GP got it exactly right. Steve hasn't resigned his post, he's taken an indefinite leave of absence. If he had quit, and Apple had appointed a successor, Apple would have had a bump in their share price, and gone on their way. He didn't. When the shareholders asked for a succession plan (i.e. whose going to run the show if Steve leaves?) they got nothing.

      What Apple is doing now is *building* apprehension amongst their shareholders. Steve leaving might not make much of a difference to Apple's production qualities - but everyone's afraid it will because Apple's acting so cagey. The fear Apple's behaviour is generating is certainly going to effect it's stock price because stock, in the end, is really based on nothing more than fears and hopes.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    6. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by euroq · · Score: 1

      Thank you. +1

      --
      Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
    7. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I understand what the word means. I used it precisely because of it's meaning.

      I'm referring to the Job's role in maintaining the Apple cult. The view that there's one way to do it - Apple's way and no other. It is a totalitarian ideology. It permits no criticism and the cult members leap in to defend the cult against all opposing points of view.

      That's a fascist world view.

      As someone with a degree in Philosophy who has studied Politicial Science, I know perfectly well what the word 'fascist' means.

      I like the way you try to define opposing views as not worthy of comment rather than thinking about them. Good little cult member.

    8. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 2

      You said: "The reason why Apple Haters are so insistent that Jobs will be back, is that they will have no-one to attribute success to without Jobs there, will have to actually admit Apple might have built a few products people like to use because they are well designed"

      I was saying that you're wrong. I'm an Apple hater but I DO NOT HATE THE PRODUCTS. I said "Apple's products, on the other hand, are top notch"

      You claim that Apple haters don't want to admit that Apple produce good products. I'm saying this is untrue - I freely admit that Apple make good products. I really like some of them. It's not the products that I hate.

      Do you fucking understand yet???

      You said: ", I label you an Apple Hater, and you claim it's the guy that you say is the whole reason behind Apple's success is what you hate.
      In other words, you are an Apple Hater by your own definition. Not to mention Drama Queen for throwing around the word "fascist"."

      Actually, you didn't label me an Apple hater, I self-identified as one. So yes, I am an Apple hater by my own definition. Did it look like I was trying to deny it? Do you have comprehension problems? Should I type slower for you?

      And WTF is your fascist attitude about using the word 'fascist'? It has a perfectly good meaning, it's the best word for describing totalitarian world views that brook no opposing thoughts and value the collective (the party, the cult). Perfectly fitting. What's your malfunction? You Apple zealots seem awfully keen on defining opposing ideas out of existence rather than thinking about them. But that's rather consistent with a cult.

      You say "A common trait of the Apple Hater is the willful ignorance of the reality of Apple gear - I'm an iOS developer, none of what you say is true. They long ago removed the restrictions to not use things like mono or the flash compilers for iPhone development, for example. Jobs doesn't decide what I do with my devices, at all - what's sad is that you are promoting the misunderstanding that is the case."

      Ah, but THEY DID IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. Just because the dictates were rescinded doesn't mean that they didn't exist in the first place. You yourself tacitly admit that these restriction existed = this is what I mean. They should NEVER EVER have existed in the first place. The fact that the policeman stops beating you with a truncheon doesn't make him now your friend.

      You also conveniently (dishonestly!) leave out the fact that you still can't use Java on the iPhone.

      Throw in Apple's capricious use of the app store to destroy competing products, censor ideas it doesn't like, unjustly profit from other people's business (30% poll tax on paid downloadable content!)... I'd rather dangle my balls into a rat trap than employ one of Job's poisoned environments. I'm not willing to have my business killed on the offhand and unjustified whim of a prick like Jobs and Apple's pack of trained lawyers.

    9. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You also conveniently (dishonestly!) leave out the fact that you still can't use Java on the iPhone.

      Out of all the continued denialism, I'll just point out that one.

      You still are fixated on what Apple ships with, not what the devices can do.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by abell · · Score: 1

      Out of all the continued denialism, I'll just point out that one.

      ...which starts with:

      What we need is a working unlocked and jailbraked IPhone

      Now, not the best example of an open platform, I would say.

    11. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by Alanis+Morissette · · Score: 1

      I'm happy you won't get modded up because you sure are full of hyperbole ;) Perhaps you should ask for your money back because that education was a waste. Even a cursory check on wikipedia shows that you are insulting the true victims of facism. Now run along back to your walled garden games console and enjoy your hypocrisy ;) ;)

    12. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      many people bought the stock on jobs appearances, if you read even OLD stuff where he is marketing apple products he focused the articles on himself, very rarely giving any credit to anyone else, that's his marketing method which has worked very well(except for next).

      it's all about jobs, but it's not many choices he's made if you look at the sw and hw trail. but the stock price is about appearances for future, apple stock is a BET that the stock will go higher, as there is no expectancy of dividends(of course, that might change). the times when it jumps higher are when jobs announces another 'groundbreaking' product, so with jobs out of the picture such sure fire days are over.

      still, losing weight due to illness sucks big time. I used to be 103kg, lost on purpose 20kg - then *bam* a case of acute pancreatitis few years ago, aftereffects were destroyed apetite and digestive system not working properly. so tables turned completely on me, lost since 10kg more despite trying my best to eat more and to find stuff that I could eat. couldn't eat chilis for two years without serious troubles, and still have to be careful with them, and I used to have to make conscious effort to not eat too much, I learnt to do rough calorie calculations etc in order to shed the weight. extremely depressing too, I can't just fill myself by force with donuts or whatever either, something wonky about not all fat breaking up so it just goes straight through(and nausea if I push it, so i try not to).

      'been off booze though since then, that sucks too. the weights stabilised now(to about 72-73) but I can't seem to increase fat reserves, more of the opposite, so i'm transforming to some iggy pop lookalike as a side effect, i'm as hard as I can to avoid looking like jobs is looking now.

      pancreas can be a real bitch organ, when it's fucked the how you feel is often fucked too and I'd rather get gangraped than have another acute attack. crushing fingers slowly? yeah, I'd rather take that too.

      I'm still under 30, usually this shit hits and kills alcies in 40-60 range, if you start having 2 day hangovers move to jamaica and drop booze, seriously.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Apple haters? Seriously. Hardly anyone hates Apple, they just think their products suck so they use other ones. To be fair, Steve Jobs is kind of an asshole and disliking him is disjoint from disliking Apple products.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    14. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      You just scared the shit out of me. All the best.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    15. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by radl33t · · Score: 1

      bla bla, you're crowing as a customer or a shareholder is just as shallow as the apple hate. Their valuation is unmistakably linked to future growth. Jobs is inextricably linked with the company's success. It stands to reason that his absence will affect apparent value. The fickle nature of consumer markets makes the issue more sensitive. Any failure or problem in his absence, specifically associated with finish or quality, could be extremely damaging to the apparent value of the company. In the short term, the investment is significantly riskier. The long term growth of a continually successful Apple is a separate issue. How large do you think they will become? Without dividends and absent (or declining) growth, their valuation will suffer.

    16. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I sorta see people who call someone else a "hater" and think that's an argument the same way.

      Yeah, calling someone a "hater" basically means you're negating someone because they happen to have a strong opinion about something...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    17. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      That's rubbish. I hate Apple but that's because I hate Jobs and his fascist tendencies.

      IOW about the only people who believe in this "personality cult of Steve Jobs" are the people who hate him and Apple.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    18. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      You dumb fuck - you CANNOT use that to make Java apps which you can release - it REQUIRES a JAILBROKEN phone.

      "You still are fixated on what Apple ships with, not what the devices can do."

      No I'm not. I said that I LIKE the devices. As a developer I DONT like the restrictions, censorship and arbitrary destruction of competing products that Apple applies. You are clearly a deluded, lying fanboy, but it would be nice if you at least answered the issues I raised.

      I notice that you also have no response for all the other points I raised.

    19. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      Isn't it Ironic?

    20. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      "IOW about the only people who believe in this "personality cult of Steve Jobs" are the people who hate him and Apple"

      Or, conversely, the Apple cultists are the only ones who don't believe that there's an Apple cult, eh, 'CheerfulMacFanboy'? I mean, for fuck's sake, I like a lot of tech, but I'd never brand MY OWN IDENTITY with one. Like you do. And anyway, I think the cult is more an Apple cult per se, than a Jobs cult. He's just the charismatic cult leader.

      I'd also point out that obviously the market - the independent thinkers who's only interest is profit, not technology or personality - they obviously think that jobs has cult-leader like influence as well, because the Apple share price wouldn't drop every time Jobs is in the news for being ill.

      QED.

    21. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      Or, conversely, the Apple cultists are the only ones who don't believe that there's an Apple cult, eh, 'CheerfulMacFanboy'? I mean, for fuck's sake, I like a lot of tech, but I'd never brand MY OWN IDENTITY with one. Like you do.

      Says the guy who calls himself "kaffiene" - addicted much, bubbele? So much that you lost all humor. The epitome of hateboyism.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    22. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      You're incoherent. I point out that you've branded yourself with your tech loyality with 'CheerfulMacFanboy' and you retort:

      'Says the guy who calls himself "kaffiene"'

      What the hell? Which tech company, (or brand of ANY kind????) is Kaffiene?

      Jesus, you morons couldn't follow an argument if the department of motor vehicles painted two fucking yellow lines down each side and shoved a sign on it saying "clue this way"

    23. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      Jees, get that stick out of your ass. Asperger's doesn't excuse everything.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    24. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      That's the best argument you've put forward so far. You are very clever.

    25. Re:You present the Apple Hater meme, not reality. by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      So, if they're unhappy as shareholders... why not sell?

  58. Hang in there Steve by smoothbob52 · · Score: 1

    I'm not an Apple fan but I have a lot of respect for Steve's accomplishments and battles both business and healthwise. On the other hand, while some of his actions in the past have been controversial, his story(ies) of success should be something for us to emulate. Oh and here's the link I'm totally dropping just for kicks. http://bit.ly/AeriaNews

  59. not news by Beowulf878 · · Score: 1

    With his history, as its publicly reported, if he wasn't seeing an oncologist even if only to rule out cancer it would be surprising. This should be expected.

    Of course, he could have been going to see a friend there or any one of a thousand things... cancer patients often get to meet each other at clinics and become friends.

    I hope he gets well soon, in any case.

  60. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    Oh, so that's why they passed on the rumor that John McCain was having an affair..no wait, they reported that one. Of course, it turned out to be untrue, unlike the John Edwards story.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  61. Re:Private Lives by zmughal · · Score: 2

    Actually that's only partially true, his profile page is here, which is accessible by the ID 4. His public figure page is different. You can't friend him, just send messages (and "Report/block this person"). Every user can do the same under their privacy settings.

  62. Re:I hate Apple by thechink · · Score: 1

    And most of the Windows world didn't switch to a true multitasking OS until Windows XP was released... and that was AFTER OS X came out.

  63. Re:Private Lives by Nocuous · · Score: 1

    Calm down, cowboy. If true, Zuckerberg not using facebook is hypocritical. (I don't know if it's true - some people posted links to the contrary, I don't care enough to check it out.)

    Your nasty little ad hominem attack was way out of proportion to the gp's post. What's really got you angry?

    --
    Don't take it personally, but I'm not going to read your pithy response to my post.
  64. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by defaria · · Score: 1

    Actually the National Enquirer has broken a number of news stories more accurate than other media outlets... And yes, we have degraded that far down if not further down. The average American is now stupider than a 5th grader!

  65. Re:Private Lives by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    respect his privacy? He's the CEO of a publicly traded company worth hundreds of Billions of dollars. The health of the CEO is material information that should be disclosed to investors, not hidden away. This is especially true for an organization that lives & breathes the the cult of personality.

    If Steve Jobs wants his privacy to be respected then I suggest he resign his position from apple. Until then he is fair game.

  66. Are you trying to put up a straw man or... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...did you just accidentally bump into that irrelevant thesis? Or are you just trolling?

    Cause you are very much confusing someone who consciously chose to be in the spotlight for their own ego-boosting and enjoyment - and someone who was been a victim of "sexual assault".
    And now the person who liked the spotlight while it was warming their ego feels bad about "their make up being all smeared from the heat" and doesn't want that kind of publicity?

    Sorry, but that is a COMPLETELY different category than someone who has (even *allegedly) been a victim of a CRIME.
    And who's privacy is obviously being handled with a little more more logic and reason than what you tried to push there, even by such a crude and cruel judge as public opinion.

    Also, my personal view on the subject has about as much influence of public opinion as my ass has influence on oceanic currents and tides.

     
     
     
    *I said "allegedly" cause, on one hand all we have so far is a very short yet VERY unclear report on something that has been characterized as "brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating" by thugs yelling, "Jew! Jew!" [sic] (Logan is not Jewish.) while at the same time being "not a rape." - and on another we have a climate of calling a very wide range of actions a "sexual assault".
    See: Julian Assange.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Are you trying to put up a straw man or... by Varkias · · Score: 1

      Cause you are very much confusing someone who consciously chose to be in the spotlight for their own ego-boosting and enjoyment - and someone who was been a victim of "sexual assault".

      I'm not the troll here and my comment obviously hit a nerve with you. I believe I was clear enough on the point I was trying to make: Nir Rosen's tweets about Lara Logan vs seeing a woman who was brutally attacked. Seeing Steve Jobs hogging the spotlight vs seeing a sick man dying of cancer. My point, both people deserve privacy even if they are "celebrities".

  67. Re:Cure For Cancer: Oxygen Therapy, raising body P by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    That's not medication, and probably the only reason you have a subscription for them is that way your insurance will pay for them.

  68. Re:Put Him on the Golden Throne by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    In the '1984' commercial that launched the Mac? The big face on the screen was Steve Jobs.

    He grew up watching the Wizard of Oz once a year on television (we all did from that generation.) He identified with 'The Great and Powerful Oz' scene the most.

    To extend the metaphor a little, your homework assignment is to figure out who Toto is.

  69. Re:I hate Apple by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Well MacOS didn't do any kind of multitasking at all until OS X, whereas Windows was Protected Mode long before XP.

  70. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

    Has the media degraded so far that we are now counting the National Enquirer as a reliable news source?

    Yes.

    Actually, no; it's degraded farther.

  71. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by tgeller · · Score: 1

    And a "trashy" magazine dedicated mostly to hairstyles and movie stars was the one who brought the photos of murdered Emmett Till to light, greatly galvanizing the U.S. civil rights movement.

    --
    Tom Geller
  72. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by multi+io · · Score: 1

    Well, they did predict remaining life expectancies of cancer patients before -- for Patrick Swayze, they predicted he had "weeks" to live TWICE, iirc -- first they said it ~2 years before his death, and then again 6 months before his death. I agree that the NE is a reputable source for the things it actually specializes in, and so I do think the the sightings of Steve Jobs are authentic. But predicting the remaining lifespan based on some photographs is bullshit.

  73. Re:Why is the media following the National Enquire by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    Can you still really trust him in his elected position?

    Hint: No.

    That's the default treatment one should give any politician. Trustworthiness should be proved/earned.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  74. All about stuck pumping and dumping by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

    It is all about stock pumping and dumping.

    Nobody believes it is Steve Jobs apart from the same journalists who used to see aliens and flying saucerers all the time. Why would Steve drive a Honda Civic ? Why would he use a 2nd rate US clinic when he went through the treatment at a specialist clinic in Europe ?

    I am long in APple shares, and thinks all this is stupid, but after options expires today, there is potential for new record highs.

    What happens when Steve is gone ? Nobody knows. But the people in Apple should be able to come up with new products without Steve. Can they find a replacement ? Maybe not. Can they find a QA guy who can approve/reject designs as Steve did ? Maybe. But I doubt he will also be the CEO, but that is not important.

  75. White space in slashdot by dargaud · · Score: 1

    The white space with slashdot 3.0 is getting completely out of hand. The comment above is only 14 lines but take out my entire screen on a 1920x1200 screen, even with a small font. I can put 2 lines between each line of text. Taco: fix this !

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  76. Re:Private Lives by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

    ... Mark?

  77. Other Reactions by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

    We in the tech world are naturally upset by this disturbing news; more so perhaps the other leaders in the industry. In fact, Steve Ballmer could barely toss a highchair, he was so distraught.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  78. Re:Private Lives by jimicus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The way Facebook is designed (and, for that matter, its popularity) means you can't. Or at least, probably shouldn't.

    The main reason why is the photo sharing feature. On facebook or not, there's a good change that quite a few photos of you have been made public (yes, including that embarrassing one from last year when you had a bit too much to drink), tagged your name against it and it's there for all to see. There have been instances of people losing their jobs because of photos on facebook - well, you could (at least in theory) lose your job because of a photo of you someone else put up even though you've never used the damn site.

    About the only thing you can do to try and prevent this is to sign up, make sure any photos of you are tagged and associated with your login then either remove those tags yourself or set your privacy settings so photos including you aren't public. Until the next time Facebook change their privacy defaults - which they'll do all they like because the users aren't the customers.

    It's the electronic equivalent of graffiti on the bridge over the main road into town saying "kiwimate is a tosser!" except it comes with photographic evidence and it's much more likely to get distributed to anyone around the world than a bridge is.

  79. Re:I hate Apple by makomk · · Score: 1

    Wrong. Windows has had true (i.e. preemptive) multitasking since Windows 95, which was released in 1995. Macs didn't get it until OS X in 2001, and that wasn't ready for actual use for another year or so - in other words, it effectively came out after Widows XP for most users. (Also, remember that the less desktop-oriented successor to Windows XP, Windows 2000, was available prior to then.)

  80. Re:How is this possible by makomk · · Score: 1

    The guy is skinny as hell. According to Wikipedia, people with extremely low BMI are healthier, and less adverse to death. Seriously something is wrong with the message I am getting from all the experts in the media, if this guy is dieing.

    Our society's attitude to weight and weight loss is indeed severely screwed up, to the point that people who are basically dying of cancer and losing weight because they can't keep food down anymore are complemented on how much healthier they look...

  81. Re:Private Lives by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Live by the sword, die by the sword. If you seek to generate income by invading the privacy of others then expect yours to be invaded for free.

    Privacy is a two way street and when it comes to minors, of course it should be compulsory.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  82. You do not speak for me by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "...and that's worrying investors of Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) this morning, as well as everyone else"

    .
    Even if he didn't want it, this automatic elevation of His Steveness to Godhood is what has turned reading or hearing his name into the equivalent of fingernails on a chalkboard. And over the last few years, having this opinion has become akin to swimming into a tsunami.

  83. Hello, my name is Michael... by TheMidget · · Score: 1
    ... and I've got a tiny iPhone up my butt.

    Tiny as compared to the size of my dick, that is.

  84. It's definitely a bug... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    When you open up all the abbreviated comments above it it gets fixed. But only until you roll-em-up again.

    Commenting this way feels like I'm using post-2007 MS Office with that stupid, paper wasting, default line-spacing and additional space after paragraph. Very annoying.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  85. Re:I hate Apple by thechink · · Score: 1

    Classic MacOS did co-operative mutlitasking.

  86. Re:I hate Apple by thechink · · Score: 1

    Sorry but the multitasking in Win 9x was crap as was the rest of the OS. I'm well aware of Windows 2000. As I said MOST of the Windows world didn't switch to a TRUE multitasking OS until XP and it wasn't really ready until SP1, a year later.

  87. Is this TMZ? by ospirata · · Score: 1

    At first I though I was readying Slashdot. Then I saw the headline about Steve Jobs....

  88. I must say... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    They may end up as larger than life figures, but celebrities are people too.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  89. Re:Of course he is dying by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    If you can accept something after you die, it seems you are immortal!

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  90. Good Luck Steve by AdmV0rl0n · · Score: 1

    I'm not an Apple fan. And I know a bit about Mr Jobs. And I know the good and certainly the bad in terms of Apple. But looking in as someone who has a small number of Apple devices, the technology is always interesting and neat as is all things that are newish in tech terms.

    Mr Jobs used to present a true sales pitch each year, and even when I was not going to buy it, it was certainly fun to watch. As to the rest, I hope you get well soon Steve. None of which is anything to do with Apple, or its good or bad Aspects.

    --
    We`re all equal .. Just some of us are less equal than others.
  91. Re:Why's MacOS X behind Microsoft Windows then? by Americano · · Score: 1

    APK! You followed me here too! That's AWESOME. Can you add a comment to your Hosts file in my honor?

    Something like, "# I wish I was as cool as Americano @ Slashdot. He's interesting, informative, witty, and insightful. Thinking about him makes me want to choke myself, because it makes me realize what a pathetic excuse for a human being I am." I think that'd be pretty awesome.

  92. History repeats by saynt · · Score: 1

    The history of the Walt Disney company following Walt's death in 1966 appears to be a strong analog for this situation. The company was driven by the vision of one man leading a team of highly talented individuals. When Walt died, the company went into a kind of auto-pilot paralysis, with everyone asking themselves 'what would Walt do?'. This was all well and good, except for the single critical fact that Walt was considered a genius because nobody could predict what he would do next, or how he would accomplish it. The focus on quality stayed, but the unpredictable spark of creativity wasn't something that you could capture by trying to put yourself into someone else's head. The company went into a stagnating decline that would last nearly two decades.

    TL;DR - You can't innovate by trying to guess what a creative genius would have done, you have to find a new one.

  93. Re:Put Him on the Golden Throne by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    To extend the metaphor a little, your homework assignment is to figure out who Toto is.

    I don't know who Toto is, but I have it on good authority that they, at some point, saw the rain down in Africa.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  94. Re:Put Him on the Golden Throne by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Sorry, joke fault. I meant, of course, that they blessed the rains down in Africa...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  95. Re:Of course he is dying by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    ...everybody dies. Seriously.

    But not everybody truly lives!

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  96. Re:Of course he is dying by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    True. However, when Jobs goes, whether that be in two weeks or two decades, he will rise again in three days, so let's not be worried.

    I hope it's not gonna be one of those deals where he rises from the dead, just to say, "See, I'm totally not dead." and then departs the mortal plane forever... That just seems like showing off.

    Really, though, if he comes back from the dead, I expect the first thing he's gonna say is, "Oh, one more thing..."

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  97. It's not fascism by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    Fascism is a political ideology but Apple is not a political entity. Apple cannot be totalitarian since their policies do not carry the force of law and are not enforced by police powers. They just make and sell products, which private citizens choose to buy or not buy.

    The metaphor of company:nation is a common one but don't forget that it is a metaphor only. In academia the policies and decisions of a company like Apple would be studied in business class, not poli sci, and certainly not philosophy.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:It's not fascism by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      I actually HAD noticed that Apple is not a country, but thanks for pointing that out for me.

      "Apple cannot be totalitarian since their policies do not carry the force of law and are not enforced by police powers."

      Rubbish. Totalitarianism is a dictatorial style that wields absolute and centralized control. That's Apple / Jobs. Using police is not a definitional part of the concept of totalitarianism (although it's consistent with the idea of enforcing control). And actually, Apple DOES use the force of law (it's squad of rabbid lawyers) to enforce its control, so actually that's very apt.

      Are you people actually incapable of thinking, because this certainly seems to be a strain on you all. Is there some defect in the American education system that makes your brains turn off when someone uses the word 'fascist'? Is this some trigger word like "nigger" which you cannot discuss rationally?

    2. Re:It's not fascism by tsa · · Score: 1

      I'm not American and I haven't been educated by the American education system. Furthermore I am truly astonished by the amount of self-importance and ignorance you show. I agree with Alanis Morisette that you have to ask your money back because that degree you have is rubbish.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:It's not fascism by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      You're telling me which words I'm allowed to use and which I'm not, and *I'm* being self important?

      Well! We've established that I'm ill-educated and I use BAD WORDS. Do you have anything to offer on what we were discussing?

    4. Re:It's not fascism by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

      You invited the critique by attempting to argue from the authority of your education. If you can show me a university philosophy or poli sci curriculum that studies Apple, Inc. I'll stand corrected.

      --
      Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    5. Re:It's not fascism by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      Not really, I was just saying that I understood what the word 'fascism' meant. I wasn't making an argument from authority because I wasn't saying "I'm right because I have a degree", I was saying merely that I understood what a word meant.

      Please take into account that I was responding to a post that said, pretty much, "I can ignore you because you used the word 'fascist'". If we're going to discuss valid argument forms, clearly that's not one of them.

      I fully agree with you that I know of no "philosophy of apple" courses at University but as stated, that's not really what anyone was talking about.

      I apologise if the comment about the education system was misdirected when it came your way. I'd just point out that most of the response I'd got was along the lines of 'I don't have to think about what you said because you said "fascism"' which is especially annoying, stupid and utterly invalid as an argument. I genuinely do not understand why so many posters brains seem to turn off on account of me using that word. Your response at least made sense, even if I don't agree with your point.

      You say that you can't use 'fascist' to describe Apple because they're not a country. My response is that you can - and I argued that could be previously (which you have ignored). Also, you fail to explain how labelling people or institutions as 'fascist' has been possible for a number of years but suddenly now is impossible when I want to apply the word to Apple. I'd argue that actual usage of the word is at odds with your assertion. If you are arguing that people or institutions have not been called 'fascist' before, then you are just simply wrong.

       

  98. Cryonics for Steve? by Keith+Henson · · Score: 1

    I have been deeply involved with cryonics since 1985. Helped on 19 of the hundred Alcor has stored.

    In fact the last one I helped with was a pancreatic cancer victim.

    If there are people reading this to are in contact with Steve Jobs, I wish they would check with him, just to be sure he has considered (and probably rejected) this option.

    It's inexpensive relative to person with Steve's resources.

    Keith Henson

    --
    End MGM. Get prospective parents of boys to Google: Men do complain
    1. Re:Cryonics for Steve? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but cryonics is stupid.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  99. Re:Mac Fag won't answer a question? Of course not. by Americano · · Score: 1

    Me:
    1) Degree in Biotechnology and Computer Science. (Did your troll factory offer dual majors, or just the standard "how to be an obnoxious twat on the internet" syllabus?)
    2) Capable of constructing a coherent argument.
    3) Able to use english words in a way that is properly associated with their meaning.

    APK:
    1) Paranoid delusions.
    2) Only able to construct rambling, Incoherent arguments.
    3) OFF TOPIC TROLL.

    I'd say I'm pretty much the winner in that comparison, friend.

  100. Let the man have his rest. by A.+is+Incognito · · Score: 1

    I mean seriously. He may be one of the most famous people in the world,
    but even he deserves the privacy in his (may I say final?) weeks.

    I bet you saw the exit letter he sent to all of Apple, alone for that he deserves some serious respect.
    Please have the dignity to pay him that in this critical time for him.

  101. Re:What school and your name for proof? by Americano · · Score: 1

    Diagnosis: APK == OFF TOPIC TROLL.

    Prognosis: APK will die unloved and alone.

  102. Sure, sure... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    If you weren't trolling there... well... don't know how to break it to you... then you are pretty darn clueless.

    My point, both people deserve privacy even if they are "celebrities".

    Except one of those people gave away their privacy willingly, readily, repeatedly and continuously in exchange for "fame and fortune" - and we should for some reason be sad cause it is coming to haunt them now.

    And the other one was a victim of an assault... who has her privacy pretty much intact and locked up tight.
    So protected in fact, that it's left to public imagination to come up how "brutal and sustained" and "sexual" it was.
    Ranging from groping to a "gang rape by up to 20 muslim egyptians".

     
     
    P.S. Don't know about you, but I find it absolutely hilarious how Rosen was forced to resign his fellowship at New York University - for committing a thoughtcrime.
    Truly a land of the free...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  103. Re:Americano LIED about having a degree? LMAO! by Americano · · Score: 1

    This isn't funny or amusing. It's boring. You're boring us all to tears, APK.

  104. Re:You saying you have a college degree is boring by Americano · · Score: 1

    YAWN

  105. But... by Cant+use+a+slash+wtf · · Score: 1

    ...I though he WAS cancer. How can cancer have cancer?

  106. Re:Private Lives by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    Privacy is a two way street and when it comes to minors, of course it should be compulsory.

    And in any other conversation you'd have the majority of /. bleating on about how "I'd let my kids do/see/read/post anything they wanted, they deserve freedom, I trust them, etc., etc.".