Slashdot Mirror


One Week: No Mouse, Just Keyboard

jfruhlinger writes "Anyone in tech has heard from grousing old-timers who believe the GUI was the beginning of the end of civilization and that EMacs keyboard shortcuts are all the interface anyone should need. But can someone use a modern consumer OS without laying hands on a mouse? Kevin Purdy gave it a week-long try."

258 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Windows? by edumacator · · Score: 1

    You should have bolded Windows, but with no mouse I guess you couldn't find the really dark B...

  2. I've sort of tried this before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sort of..."

    Around 13 years ago, I've tried using the keyboard to move the mouse pointer. I was still a student then so I couldn't afford buying a replacement for my broken mouse. You'll get by with keyboard shortcuts. The only time I found it necessary to move the mouse pointer was when I played Command & Conquer.

  3. iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes. I have never used a mouse on iOS and it works just fine.

    1. Re:iOS by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Using the magic trackpad with OS X is awesome for most work, especially any browsing since scrolling is so much better than with a wheel. The only thing I dislike is that the web hasn't caught up to gestures yet.

      Funny thing, though, the only mouse I have is a gaming mouse because regular mice don't feel at all comfortable.

    2. Re:iOS by initialE · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, OSX is atrociously tied to the mouse.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    3. Re:iOS by AresTheImpaler · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, OSX is atrociously tied to the mouse.
      No it's not.. In fact, I'll say that it's quite the opposite. It helps to know the shortcuts, but I get to do lots without touching the mouse.. some of hte most important shortcuts are:
      - cmd-space (opens spotlight) Spotlight can be used as an application luncher and/or find specific files
      - cmd-q (quit current program)
      - cmd-w (close current window)
      - while typing, pretty much if not almost all the applications allow for a few of the emacs shortcuts. For example, ctr-a to move to the front of the line, ctr-e to move to the back...

  4. Keyboard only support should be mandatory by Killer+Orca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had an adviser who was blind, the only was he could access his computer was a combination screen reader + keyboard. I cannot imagine the number of things he is cut-off from due to a lack of support for keyboards.

    1. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by kakyoin01 · · Score: 1

      Completely agreed. Software developers should consider ethical issues that their software may revolve around.

      --
      The more you know, the more you have to say and the more you should listen.
    2. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Completely agreed. Software developers should consider ethical issues that their software may revolve around.

      I had a lot more to say about this, but I don't think I can explain it properly.
      But, I disagree as many others surely will. If you want software made for every handicap known to man, write it yourself.
      There are no "ethical issues".

    3. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by guybrush3pwood · · Score: 1

      If you want software made for every handicap known to man, write it yourself. There are no "ethical issues".

      Such an opinion such not be posted as AC. We can't trash you properly.

      --
      Perhaps I'm trolling, perhaps I'm not.
    4. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by mastershake82 · · Score: 1

      Oh definitely. Society is so overrated.

      The handicap should fend for themselves!

      I defend myself from crime on my own regularly. Just last week a huge fire started in my house... but it was no problem because I was able to put it out with my mass water carrying vehicle that I invented and built from scratch. Then I went to my backyard and slaughtered a cow and picked some vegetables for dinner. That I then prepared on an electric oven that is powered by a hydroelectric plant I invented and built over a river on my property.

      Hopefully, that seemed ridiculous to you, because it is. But that is precisely what you are saying a handicap person should do for any need not covered by the needs of the majority. Just because a handicapped person has different or even additional needs to the average member of the society doesn't mean that every other member of the society shouldn't exert additional effort to try to provide them the best possible quality of life. That's what society is all about. And don't be surprised to find out that one of the people you had so quickly written off because their abilities were different than yours changes the world.

    5. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      You don't need to have a handicap to have problems with mouse interaction.

      case 1
      your writing a reply in slashdot and you brush the trackpad as you are writing and suddenly the insertion point has moved and your now writing into an earlier sentence.

      case 2
      your using openoffice or libre office and creating a document with both text and graphics. One of the trickiest has to be an image as a page border a second image as a water mark within the border and then text on top.

      precisely locating the images where you want them is not easy with a mouse, but having done so its a real
      bitch to work on the text without accidentally selecting the image and moving it.

      it's practically impossible to select a line of text with the mouse once there is an image behind the text.

      case 3
      combining images in the gimp isn't easy to make say 5 copies of the same image in to 1 column usually there is some horizontal or vertical misalignment you only see when printing.

      These issues could be addressed within applications and the operating system.

      first why not a hot key to turn the trackpad on and off, capslock might be an ideal candidate for this.

      why not a keyboard combo which would allow you to move the pointer a pixel at a time. thus eliminating the judder which always makes moving things precisely such a balls.

      finally couldn't we get a lock on different elements in a document.
      so when I have my images in place i can then ignore them while i work on the text.

      If these sorts of issues were addressed then there would be less of a problem for people with disabilities as well.

      The on / off button for the trackpad would be a start.

    6. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Case 4
      You have have one hand on the mouse so you can't reach the shift key?

    7. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      Pinball may/may not be an option.

    8. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by duh+P3rf3ss3r · · Score: 1

      I don't know how to address this in other operating systems but, in GNOME on GNU/Linux, you can get around case 1 by checking the "Disable trackpad whilst typing" option.

      --
      Give a man a match: warm him for an instant. Douse him in petrol and set him aflame: warm him for the rest of his life.
    9. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      touchpad indicator, allows you to turn on/off the track pad with a key combo of your choice its in a ppa for ubuntu
      the disable trackpad while typing option only works if you don't pause to think. I've found it helps but isn't a cure, it just reduces the frequency.

      touchpad indicator seems to be quite good although it didn't start on startup for me that might just be a glitch

      libre office does have a protect mode for images to lock them in place at the size you set. however if you are editing text over an image the image will get selected instead of say a line of text and pressing escape will take you to the beginning of the page of text.

      Ideally i'd like a protected mode which allows the image to be ignored completely

    10. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by duh+P3rf3ss3r · · Score: 1

      I don't do a lot of editing of text over images, so this might be a stupid question, but couldn't you just add and position the image after you've done typing?

      --
      Give a man a match: warm him for an instant. Douse him in petrol and set him aflame: warm him for the rest of his life.
    11. Re:Keyboard only support should be mandatory by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      probably easier if I explain each sunday there is a sunday lunch menu which changes each week to a certain extent some items appear every sunday some are variations e.g there will be a soup on the menu but it will be a different soup. special event menu's are handled similarly.

      So I will generally take the last sunday menu and edit it for the current sundays items. while i could do the layout from scratch removing the images and putting them back it would just be extra work and take longer. Since i've found options to lock the images from moving or resizing its become easier with fewer accidents.

      I guess what i am looking for is a lock on certain page elements, the images are purely decoration.
      being able to lock elements and essentially ignore them would be a great help even text blocks would be handy to lock so i can focus on the task in hand be it titles menu sections page backgrounds and borders.

      maybe even an option to composite pages say a page of images a page of text and then overlay the two pages or perhaps a two stage print out so there could be a little colour printed by an inkjet but the bulk of the page printed by laser. In the main i tend to do bulk printing by laser and one off jobs that need colour with my inkjet.

      probably not the hardest features to add.

         

  5. Sure, it's just harder by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    One of our students is blind and he doesn't use a mouse on his computer as it really wouldn't be so useful. He's got a keyboard, a braille output device, and screen reading software. He moves about the system (Windows XP) using only the keyboard. It works, it is just slower than using a mouse.

    I've operated Windows systems without mice occasionally because there was some problem, and again, works just fine. Even though I do it rarely, I can still do it just fine.

    1. Re:Sure, it's just harder by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its one of the few areas I found WinXP more usable than Linux -- I can operate a WinXP box from startup to shutdown without a mouse, where I find Gnome's UI requires a mouse to navigate some options.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:Sure, it's just harder by chammy · · Score: 1

      Really? I can't think of any operation you can't do with just a keyboard in Linux, regardless of WM.

      It's likely you just weren't aware of a shortcut/command to do what you wanted.

    3. Re:Sure, it's just harder by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      If you're going through the trouble of mouse keys just to select menus, know that you can reach any menu item by hitting a top menu's Alt+key character, then arrowing down, right if there's a submenu, and finally enter to select. There's even faster ways if you continue using Alt keys once the menu is down.

      You don't need to remember control-key shortcuts for this, just where the menu item you're looking for is (which you'd need to know for mouse keys too).

    4. Re:Sure, it's just harder by Miffe · · Score: 1

      X also has Mouse Keys, press Alt+Shift+NumLock to turn on/off.

      See more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouse_keys

    5. Re:Sure, it's just harder by fatphil · · Score: 1

      The fact that there are so many different WMs and environments means that it's entirely possible none of them do everything for you, keyboard-wise. Every time you make one type of interaction easier, you typically make some other interaction more difficult. Sometimes one becomes impossible.

      However, if you don't care for all of the fluff of the heavier window managers, then there are definitely some that are well optimised for keyboard use. I personally use DWM but I know others that use Ratpoison and Awesome. DWM's not mouse-unfriendly either - sometimes my hand won' leave the mouse for hours, it just depends what I'm doing.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    6. Re:Sure, it's just harder by Gripp · · Score: 1

      back when hacking/customizing XP was the thing i accidentally turned *EVERYTHING* black while trying to turn just the BG of the start menu black... and was able to remember undo the entire thing with just keyboard commands. starting with the windows key and using arrows to get through the start menu... i had no clue whether what i was selecting was correct, or even doing anything!
      but yeah, had i not known how to navigate via keyboard i would have had to re format... its good stuff to know for sure.

    7. Re:Sure, it's just harder by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Here's one off the top of my head:

      Go into the network settings GUI in Gnome and tab to the toolbar, now move left and right and try to get the middle buttons. It doesn't work; the cursors jump over to the next section without highlighting all options in between.

      These are UI issues that Windows sorted out a long time ago for one reason or another that annoy me in Linux.

      Of course, ALT+F2->"gnome-terminal" works fine ;-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  6. The conkeror web browser by tamyrlin · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you aren't on friendly terms with your mouse I would recommend the conkeror web browser. This has saved me quite some hazzle in situations where I either don't have a mouse (my TV computer) or when the mouse is awkward to use (my laptop with a substandard trackpad).

    For those who don't know, conkeror is a web browser based on xulrunner which is designed to be used in an effective manner without a mouse. If you happen to like emacs, you'll probably feel right at home since the keybindings (by default) are inspired by emacs. If you are not familiar with emacs you will probably need some more time to get used to conkeror. However, since conkeror allows you to use a mouse as well if you want to you can adapt to the browser without feeling too handicapped.

    If this seems interesting you can find more information about conkeror at http://conkeror.org/.

    1. Re:The conkeror web browser by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

      I prefer Pentadactyl. From what I understand vimperator is a little too heavy and has not been updated for a really long time. Pentadactyl is frequently updated fork.

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  7. Re:Windows? by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Windows is FAR better than Linux in the run-the-GUI-with-keyboard-only department. Sure, Linux has a better console environment, but these keyboard jockeys utterly failed at keyboard jockeying their graphical programs.

    I liked the Amiga's solution: Holding down one of the Amiga keyboard buttons turned the cursor keys into a virtual mouse, with Enter or Space or something representing the mouse buttons. A very simple solution when some program didn't have a keyboard shortcut and it wasn't worth grabbing the rodent.

  8. Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by sconeu · · Score: 2

    On Win7, how the F*** do you log off, shutdown, or restart without a mouse?

    On XP, it was {CTRL+ESC|WinKey}, U, {L|R|S}

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by JazzXP · · Score: 1

      Windows Key (Ctrl+Esc), Right Arrow, Right Arrow, Enter

    2. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      Ctrl-esc, right arrow, enter

    3. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by cpicon92 · · Score: 2

      There are several ways. The easiest would be command+D to get to the desktop, and then alt+f4.

    4. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Winkey-R, logoff
      Winkey-R, shutdown /s /t 0
      Winkey-R, shutdown /r /t 0

    5. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by Ascylon · · Score: 2

      win+r (run prompt), shutdown /s /f /t 1 or shutdown /r /f /t 1 or logoff (shutdown/restart/logoff). Incidentally, the same works for WinXP (instead of slashes use hyphens, -s instead of /s etc).

    6. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For XP I just hit Win key, U, U. That little bit quicker ;)
      Restart? Win key, U, R.

    7. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      [winkey] [right arrow] selects the shutdown button

    8. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      Shutdown: {CTRL+ESC|WinKey}, {Right}, {Enter}
      Restart, Logoff or Lock: {CTRL+ESC|WinKey}, {Right}, {Right}, {R|L|O}

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    9. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      This has annoyed me to no end as well. Most importantly, force the machine to shut down and not hibernate, etc. without a mouse.

      I used the Win, U, U combo very often.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    10. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by znerk · · Score: 1

      How about you press that nice big shiny button on the box itself?

      I love freaking people out by just reaching over and pressing the power button, then watching as the system gracefully shuts down.
      They're so used to only touching the actual tower to turn the system *on* that it throws them for a loop when I use the exact same button to turn it *off*.

      Surprise!

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    11. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 1

      Ctrl alt del, tab to task manager, and new task.
      Type cmd, .
      Shutdown -r -t 00

      The command, in specific, helps for terminal access only (ie. Text only, no gui).

      --
      Something witty.
    12. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yea, this can be a problem. I've had mice go out and then end up confused on how to do some basic things. Shutting down is easy, but if you want to gracefully shut down an application first, or send an email to friends saying why you're going to be late, it's a bit cumbersome. I don't need the mouse when developing code since the tools I use are keyboard friendly (shell terminal and emacs and gcc and gdb) but you need the mouse a lot of dumb applications that don't have convenient keyboard controls (mail, browser, word, etc).

    13. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Dunno about log off and reboot, but shutdown can be done by simply hitting the power button on most computers these days.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    14. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Run/Stop - Restore.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    15. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Win-D to get to desktop
      Alt-F4 for the shutdown option

    16. Re:Logoff/Shutdown/Restart by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't know of anything you can't do in win 7 via the keyboard.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Re:Windows? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1, Informative

    Windows is actually mostly OK w/o mouse. Most MSFT applications are quite keyboard friendly. Ditto Mac OS X. The OSs give impression that they were at least somehow tested for the occasional mouse failure. (Safari with keyboard only is very functional.)

    Can't say the same for the modern Linuxes, Ubuntu 11.04 in particular (IIRC previous versions, based on GNOME 2.x are not better). Recently my trackball dyed and I had to get around with only keyboard. It was abysmal. Essentially, it went like Alt-F2, xterm, sync, etc, shutdown -h how. From GUI, trying to eject the USB drive properly without the mouse to me proved to be impossible.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  10. Re:my usual practice by Lennie · · Score: 1

    Exactly my thought and most webpages can use some work on that.

    Maybe even browsers.

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
  11. What web browser was he using? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but by Tuesday, I’m really committed, and very familiar with the Tab key. It’s the universal navigation tool across apps and web sites, but all you can do is hope that it lands you on the right button in a minimum of taps.

    I don't grep any obvious mention in there about his web-browser, but I should mention that, Opera has, among other tools*, a way to roughly navigate the 2D page via arrow keys while holding down shift. Much easier than hitting tab N times.

    * For example, you can use text-searches to simply type the link you want and then hit enter (I often use this in forums) or Control-J to show all links in a page.

  12. Rather silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While interesting, the whole premise is rather silly. Trying to use an object while rejecting the intended control scheme and asking "will it work as well?" is the silly part. What's next, examining the effect of trying to drive a car with no steering wheel, just the column to grab onto? It's built to use the wheel, and is a daft comparison to make. For the best user experience, a modern OS is built to use the mouse (or a touchscreen for a mobile).

  13. touchscreens are worse by KiloByte · · Score: 2

    A worse case: on n900, a device with a keyboard, Nokia in their infinite wisdom decided that to set an alarm you need to swipe a number of times to scroll to the hour and minute you want.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:touchscreens are worse by wick3t · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Nokia's bad application design has nothing to do with touch screen usability. The beauty of the N900 is that it sets no limits to what you can do and you can easily use the command line to do everything. If you don't like Nokia's alarm application, install cron and use that.

  14. Re:Windows? by jnpcl · · Score: 1

    I believe this has been moved into the Accessibility features for most modern OS'.

  15. What happened? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

    I would have loved to click the link in the article, but I couldn't as I too have given up my mouse...

    1. Re:What happened? by thrash242 · · Score: 1

      In Firefox, at least, it's really easy:

      Type / then part of the link text and then enter

      Ex: "/ gave it " for the link to the article. Of course, just tabbing until you get to the link works also.

  16. Re:all the time by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

    Don't you have a Wal-Mart SuperCenter nearby? Even though the chain sucks ass and is questionable when it comes to business practices, every one of them nearby is open all night, every night. You're only screwed if you want to buy beer, due to Ohio's state alcohol laws (boo, anti-drug laws). Or what about Walgreens? Both of those are open practically 24/7 (with Christmas being one of, if not their only times closed AFAIK). Not sure if all Walgreens are open all the time, but it seems like at least all the local Wal-Marts are...

  17. Re:Windows? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

    You actually use a wysiwyg editor for posting comments, and not <b>bold</b> tags? I don't use a Mac, so clearly my keyboard shortcuts are faster.

  18. Re:all the time by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    I taught myself to not use the mouse after my laptop came without a mouse. It was hard for about 10 minutes, but there's this space under the spacebar that seems to work pretty well.

  19. Re:Windows? by starofale · · Score: 1

    There isn't just one Linux GUI. Sure, some are designed to mainly use the mouse, but then there are others designed to only need a keyboard.
    For example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xmonad

  20. And more importantly... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    why the hell did they change it? Here you have keyboard commands that millions of people have memorized, and they throw them out just for the hell of it. It's almost as if Microsoft doesn't give a damn about their customers. Crazy, I know.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:And more importantly... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      why the hell did they change it? Here you have keyboard commands that millions of people have memorized, and they throw them out just for the hell of it. It's almost as if Microsoft doesn't give a damn about their customers. Crazy, I know.

      I've stopped asking why MS changes stuff for no apparent reason; it's just what MS does. It seems it's just one arbitrary interface/command being changed into a different arbitrary interface/commend. There may be some PHB calculation somewhere deep in MS that "shows" it increases revenue by 1.3% or the like. (I've tried Open-Office, but it has it own annoyances.)

    2. Re:And more importantly... by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here you have keyboard commands that millions of people have memorized

      certainly not millions.
      thousands for sure.
      maybe 10s of thousands.

      why the hell did they change it?

      Because opening the start menu puts you in the search bar. Pressing "U" in the search bar puts a U in the search bar. It can't really be used for a hotkey unless nobody is allowed to search for things that start with 'u'.

      And for what its worth, putting search in the start bar was a GOOD thing. I rarely ever have to go digging through the start menu hierarchy any more.

      Search is better than the run dialog as well because it works for documents, as well.

      So why they hell did they change it? Because they made it better, and millions of users (this time actual millions) benefitted.

      It's almost as if Microsoft doesn't give a damn about their customers

      Or maybe its you that doesn't? Because having everyone else have to push an extra key to get the search box just so people like you could still press U instead of right-arrow would be asinine.

    3. Re:And more importantly... by pz · · Score: 1

      And for what its worth, putting search in the start bar was a GOOD thing. I rarely ever have to go digging through the start menu hierarchy any more.

      Disclaimer: I have not used Win 7. All of my Windows boxes run XP (or, in some cases, 98 ... no need to update a working data-collection setup).

      That sure sounds more and more like a command line. At the Unix prompt we (all should) know and love, you type the first few characters, hit TAB, and boom! you get a list of options that the system knows about as executable programs. Think of it as a highly indexed and cached search.

      And I bet there are even shells that I've not used that would allow general searching -- like, type macTAB and get emacs.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:And more importantly... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Indeed, in fact for this exact purpose - that is, using the keyboard to the exclusion of the mouse - putting the cursor in the search bar upon pressing the Windows key is a massive improvement. Microsoft makes a lot of stupid design choices but they always seemed to have placed keyboard usability at a relatively high priority.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    5. Re:And more importantly... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Kind of, but it is a true search - that is, it will show results that don't necessarily start with what was typed, e.g. "Word" will find "Microsoft Office Word 2007", as well as other things that are not executables, like documents, web bookmarks, and control panels.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    6. Re:And more importantly... by lordofwhee · · Score: 1

      And for what its worth, putting search in the start bar was a GOOD thing. I rarely ever have to go digging through the start menu hierarchy any more.

      The idea there's a search bar there hasn't once gone through my head except after spending several seconds wondering where the hell the "Run..." item went. Admittedly I only use Windows for gaming purposes, but I've had it installed for quite some time (think years). The fact I cannot get used to it means either my brain is off or MS made a bad decision. This being /., you can probably figure out which I think it is.

    7. Re:And more importantly... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      why the hell did they change it? Here you have keyboard commands that millions of people have memorized, and they throw them out just for the hell of it. It's almost as if Microsoft doesn't give a damn about their customers. Crazy, I know.

      "Training revenue." That, and the ability to sell "new shiny!"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:And more importantly... by neonmonk · · Score: 1

      You may think it's Microsoft's fault. but I guarantee you that it's just because you're brain-dead.

    9. Re:And more importantly... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The fact I cannot get used to it means either my brain is off or MS made a bad decision. This being /., you can probably figure out which I think it is.

      Go ahead, but I strongly suspect you're in small company. If you ask me, the search box is the best thing MS has done with the Windows GUI since the addition of the quick launch icons back in the 95/98 era. It's significantly better than what you get with any of the Linux UIs except KDE. (I'm assuming it's possible to get that set up right, though I haven't bothered. I'm also talking from the point of view of launching GUI programs, not stuff that you'd be running in a console anyway.)

      (And don't read that as "it's the least bad of a poor lot" either.)

    10. Re:And more importantly... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      My impression is that Microsoft is so big that it's gone rule-by-committee. Any organization that big does it. So it's a big fucking monster that nobody is really in charge of anymore. No total design, no adults in charge. Lots of little teams and middle managers poking around in Windows here and there to make their mark.

    11. Re:And more importantly... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What's this search on start bar? You mean I don't have to use the "Run" menu in order to type "calc" anymore? Is it like the spotlike thingy on Mac?

    12. Re:And more importantly... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Because opening the start menu puts you in the search bar.

      This is where they went wrong.

      Opening the start menu should put you into the start menu, not some component thereof whereby you then can't get out of.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    13. Re:And more importantly... by motokochan · · Score: 1

      On modern Linux DEs, it would be similar to the Alt+F2 shortcut that pulls up the "run command" box. On KDE4, at least, you can do the very same thing by having documents and such show in the results as well. I actually like this change that Microsoft made as it really does improve starting an application or loading a document.

    14. Re:And more importantly... by TimboJones · · Score: 1

      Esc, the Windows key, or any arrow key will get you out of the search box.

    15. Re:And more importantly... by ericvids · · Score: 1

      why the hell did they change it?

      Because "WinKey, U" does not always work, especially in WinXP. Run any start menu program that starts with the letter U and you've overridden it. (On earlier Windows versions you need to manually pin a program that starts with the letter U on the start menu.)

      The "WinKey, Right, Enter" solution is much better and never gets overridden by anything else you've run.

      --
      Pet peeve: Profane people propagating perfunctory pedantry.
    16. Re:And more importantly... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>So why they hell did they change it? Because they made it better, and millions of users (this time actual millions) benefitted.

      Ugh, please don't encourage them. The windows search fiasco was the worst feature of Vista/Win7.

      It took a fully deterministic start menu and made it non-deterministic. (Close your eyes, tap the windows key and type "itunes" and hit return. See what launches.) This is *bad* user interface design.

      Fortunately, the guys at Classic Shell (http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/) have fixed the start menu back to its former, sane, design. If you really want to type-to-find on my start menu, I hit tab, and start typing, and it works just like any other Win7 search term. But I still have the ability to use the shortcuts to launch things with three keystrokes, in less than a quarter of a second. I'm not happy with any interface that makes me wait a second or two to get to the point where I can launch something.

    17. Re:And more importantly... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>What's this search on start bar? You mean I don't have to use the "Run" menu in order to type "calc" anymore? Is it like the spotlike thingy on Mac?

      On Windows7, it's better to use run and type calc than to use the search on the start bar. When you win-R (or win,R) and type calc, you know exactly what you're going to get.

      On the retarded Win7 search bar, if you blindly type calc in the search window and hit return, you might end up with calc.exe, or you might end up opening a picture of Calculon from Futurama.

      Microsoft truly doesn't understand why non-deterministic behavior is bad in UIs. You can go all the way back to Office's "smart" menus...

    18. Re:And more importantly... by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      Microsoft truly doesn't understand why non-deterministic behavior is bad in UIs. You can go all the way back to Office's "smart" menus...

      It's all very well poking holes in the golden veneer of MS but that particular 'hole' was plugged by the innovative and emminently likeable 'clippy'.

      Quite often I have forgotten what I was doing and clippy has set me on the right track. My consultant is still trying to work out why I always forget what I'm doing when I am 'trying to write a letter' (thanks clippy!). If only my consultant had his own clippy to assist!

    19. Re:And more importantly... by amliebsch · · Score: 2

      How is that possible? "Programs" are always listed in the search results above "Documents," so calc.exe should always come before calculon.jpg.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    20. Re:And more importantly... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      "Opening the start menu should put you into the start menu, not some component thereof whereby you then can't get out of."

      Press tab or an arrow key?!

    21. Re:And more importantly... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      It took a fully deterministic start menu and made it non-deterministic. (Close your eyes, tap the windows key and type "itunes" and hit return. See what launches.) This is *bad* user interface design.

      Yes, that's why google search is bad user interface design too... because its non-deterministic what you'll find when you search.

      A search bar ... searches.

      Menus that update themselves a la Office 2003 or whatever are bad ui, search bars that return the result of searching are not.

      Most people prefer the search bar, why? Because not everything i do is "launch a program". More often than not its "open a document", and the search bar handles that very elegantly. I type "company proposal" and it's right there... I type 'employment contract" and its right there... i type "options agreement" or "win7 iso" or "raiders of the lost ark" ... no more navigating through deep folder structures to get at documents most of the time.

      And it works well for "writer" "calc" to open the openoffice programs... or and notepad, and cmd. Granted its not "deterministic" that the search will return the program I want first on every computer every time. But a glance before pressing enter works just fine, and i only have to type a few keystrokes instead of the full name.

      And hey... if I want deterministic behaviour... instead of pressing Win to get to the search bar, I press Win+R to get to the run box.

      That's better than your solution because:

      a) Win+R is as easy as Win

      b) Being able to use Win/Win+R as I expect it to works on every computer I encounter... except yours. It must drive you nuts to use any computer but your own.

      c) I don't have to install another program "classic shell"

    22. Re:And more importantly... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>A search bar ... searches.

      The start menu search is supposed to be the primary launcher for unpinned applications.

      >>But a glance before pressing enter works just fine

      Too slow, hombre! Too slow by far.

      That's better than your solution because:

      a) Win+R is as easy as Win

      b) Being able to use Win/Win+R as I expect it to works on every computer I encounter... except yours. It must drive you nuts to use any computer but your own.

      c) I don't have to install another program "classic shell"

      Classic Shell is awesome. It lets you clean all the useless cruft out of your start menu, and re-enables being able to tap the win key and immediately use hotkeys to navigate through it. I have a whole submenu of commonly used directories, documents, and applications which I access by tapping Win,I, and then the first letter of the target. I can launch my todo.txt file, for example, by typing Win,I,T, and I can do this faster than the draw animation on the start menu.

      I use this for things of middling importance - not important enough to pin to the start menu (which eats up start menu space, anyway, so I only have FF pinned), but used often enough to have a hotkey set up for it. My start menu is also the size of a playing card, without decoration, as opposed to the monstrosity that the normal Win7 start menu looks like.

      I use Win+R all the time (or Win,R) for things like calc and notepad. But for launching directories and files, it's better (faster) to use hotkeys of one flavor or another.

      On computers not my own, I just use the slower Win7 search bar. If I'm not doing development, the lack of speed doesn't bother me.

    23. Re:And more importantly... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      >>A search bar ... searches.

      >The start menu search is supposed to be the primary launcher for unpinned applications

      Most people are document centric not application centric.

      >>But a glance before pressing enter works just fine

      >Too slow, hombre! Too slow by far.

      The glance would be when using other peoples computers. I know what program is listed first on my own, and it never changes unless I install something new -- that's deterministic enough for me.

      Classic Shell is awesome. It lets you clean all the useless cruft out of your start menu

      The win7 start menu lets you take practically everything out.

      I can launch my todo.txt file, for example, by typing Win,I,T, and I can do this faster than the draw animation on the start menu.

      You clearly went to a lot of work to organize all that. Which is fine and I don't really have an argument that you are wrong for your needs.

      Win7 brings very nearly that level of performance to everyone with almost no manual configuration. I won't claim its just as fast, but its very fast, and it works out of the box... very VERY few people have put as much effort into optimizing their start menu as you have.

      This is, i think, a better solution for them, so I think Microsoft made the right choice. Perhaps not for you... but for the userbase at large.

    24. Re:And more importantly... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not the first time they changed it. In Windows 95 the shut down dialog box always came up with "Shutdown" selected. Starting with Windows 98 it came up remembering the last thing you had selected. So in Windows 95 I learned [Winkey][U][Enter] to turn off the computer, and to this day I still do that out of habit occasionally. Usually with a goddammit shortly afterwards when the computer sleeps or restarts or does something I didn't intend.

      Incidentally, you can also break this functionality by adding something to the first level of the start menu that starts with the letter U.

      Also, since no one has seemed to mention it, another way shut down Vista/7 is to use Ctrl-Alt-Del and tab over to the power button/menu thing. Similar thing also works on XP.

  21. Re:Windows? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    that's an Ubuntu problem, not a "Linux" problem. There are Linux distros that are accessibility-friendly. Pure, raw, actual Linux doesn't really have a gui anyway.

  22. Blind people do every day don't they? by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 2

    For many folks it's a more than an entertaining jaunt into the wild west of accessibility, it's a way of life.

  23. linux has keyboard mousing by default by dthirteen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In soviet linux the keyboard is the mouse:

    http://www.tuxfiles.org/linuxhelp/movecursor.html

    1. Re:linux has keyboard mousing by default by teslar · · Score: 2

      The same works in Windows and OSX (and probably other OSes). It's an old thing called mouse keys.
      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Mouse_keys

  24. Opera's spatial navigation by TheCyberShadow · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm surprised nothing was said about spatial navigation (particularly because Opera touts this as a big feature). It looks like Chrome is getting this too, though.

  25. Sure you can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... I'm doing it all day long. Using a tiling window manager like dwn, wmii, awesome, ratpoison, (etc.) you can arrange your windows with the keyboard. Most applications I use on a daily basis are console-based anyway: vim, mutt, irssi, ... Even firefox is keyboard-friendly if you install the vimperator plugin.

    Most of the time, I feel like I'm much faster using just the keyboard, especially when programming. However, there are of course certain applications where a mouse is needed (like image manipulation (GIMP), CAD, ..).

  26. Re:my usual practice by Wintervenom · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are using Firefox, try the Pentadactyl nightly or Vimperator.

  27. Re:Windows? by Volanin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I liked the Amiga's solution: Holding down one of the Amiga keyboard buttons turned the cursor keys into a virtual mouse.

    In Linux you can press SHIFT + NUMLOCK.
    This toggles numpad-keys-as-virtual-mouse behaviour.

    --
    If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
    If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
  28. xmonad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Designed for just keyboard use.
    http://xmonad.org/

  29. Re:Windows? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A WM isn't the whole story. You could end up still fighting the GUI toolkit all the way down if the application isn't built with foresight. Even something as simple as bad tab order between fields.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  30. Re:Windows? by vux984 · · Score: 1

    OSX ?

    How does one access the menu items without a mouse in OSX? Genuinely asking... on windows you press alt, and then you can navigate the menu system with the arrows. I'm pretty sure that doesn't work on the mac.

    And I know I've hit thousands of OSX dialog boxes that won't let you tab between the buttons or controls. (especially radio buttons and checkboxes...) My mac's not in arms reach or I'd fool around and find some examples...

  31. Windows is the best for it. by drolli · · Score: 3

    I did this from time to time (lets just say in the lab i find it enough if every oscilloscope or auxiliary control computer has a keyboard flying around without a mandatory mouse.

    The gnome desktop was hard to navigate, Windows for sure possible and more consistent across applications.

    1. Re:Windows is the best for it. by theripper · · Score: 1

      )

      Stupid content filter won't just let me close the damned parenthesis.

    2. Re:Windows is the best for it. by LoudMusic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even though Mac OS and OS X both have extensive keyboard controls, neither is possible to use exclusively with a keyboard. I've found Windows to be the most keyboard friendly GUI OS. Which I think is kind of odd ...

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    3. Re:Windows is the best for it. by drolli · · Score: 1

      No its not odd. A lot of lawyers would wait to kick the shit out of MS or its customers for being non-accessible and sue for an insane amount of money. For MS producing an OS which is non-accessible would put them of the buying list of large customers.

      Actually i believe one reason why Apple is targeting consumers is because labor laws can be more harsh when it comes to euqal chances than consumer laws.

    4. Re:Windows is the best for it. by gkearney · · Score: 2

      MacOS X has a full scale screen reader for the blind. Not only can you run the OS without a mouse you can run it without a screen if you need to. Using a bluetooth keyboard and headset I have even run a Mac that was indoors from my patio.

    5. Re:Windows is the best for it. by farnsworth · · Score: 1

      I've found Windows to be the most keyboard friendly GUI OS. Which I think is kind of odd ...

      I have heard it said that at some point the military would not buy software that required a mouse, so MS made an OS that didn't require one. I don't know how true this is, but MS has obviously put an enormous amount of effort into allowing their GUI to be run without a mouse. There are probably dozens of people who work on this aspect of Windows/Explorer exclusively.

      --

      There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

    6. Re:Windows is the best for it. by tokul · · Score: 1

      The gnome desktop was hard to navigate,

      Ctrl+Alt+F1 or Alt+F2
      how hard is that?

    7. Re:Windows is the best for it. by pond0123 · · Score: 2

      OS X can be navigated entirely using the keyboard.

      System Preferences -> Universal Access -> Mouse Keys: On

    8. Re:Windows is the best for it. by serialband · · Score: 1

      OSX was created with an API where you had to program each keyboard shortcut. Macs introduced the mouse to the general population so they made everything rely on the mouse. Windows got created later when keyboard shortcuts was automatically built into the API because they didn't require or expect a user to buy a mouse. I'm not sure of the development of X, other than they weren't as good at designing UI in their spare time.

    9. Re:Windows is the best for it. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      OSX was created with an API where you had to program each keyboard shortcut. Macs introduced the mouse to the general population so they made everything rely on the mouse. Windows got created later when keyboard shortcuts was automatically built into the API because they didn't require or expect a user to buy a mouse. I'm not sure of the development of X, other than they weren't as good at designing UI in their spare time.

      That would be surprising, as the old MacOS Classic days all you did was define your menus including shortcuts. ResEdit was a great way to redefine crappy key shortcuts back then (or add shortcuts to missing entries), and I'm fairly certain today that short of the special modifier keys, that keyboard shortcuts can be zero-overhead items if desired. In Windows you do have to add a tiny bit of programmatic support for shortcuts, but it's fairly generic code that people boilerplate on.

      Windows was designed to be primarily keyboard-navigatable - Macs came with mice, PCs didn't. So expecting the user to buy a mouse was quite unrealistic for Windows (back in the old days of serial mice, PS/2 mice, bus mice, etc.). Nevermind laptops as well - which may or may not even have a port you could plug a mouse into.

      About the only input devices you could count on a PC having support for was a keyboard and a joystick.

    10. Re:Windows is the best for it. by lahvak · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons I use neither Gnome nor KDE is that it is really hard to navigate them with just a keyboard. On the other hand, there are number of window managers that can be configured to be operated completely without a mouse. I use FVWM, and although I use a mouse, I can, and often do, get all my work done without it.

      --
      AccountKiller
    11. Re:Windows is the best for it. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's not really too surprising to me, as Windows dates back to when mice on PCs was fairly uncommon. On the other hand, the Macintosh has always had a mouse, and Gnome/KDE development has pretty much taken place after a mouse became standard equipment. Though it is somewhat surprising that Microsoft has seemingly gone to the trouble of making sure pretty much every shortcut I learned 20 years ago in Windows 3.0 to get around still worked in every version since then.

  32. Too extreme by gweihir · · Score: 2

    The mouse is useful to select windows, do edge-scroll between virtual desktops and select text regions. (fvwm2, obviously)

    Other than that, I use it for gaming and that is it.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Too extreme by Andrei+D · · Score: 1

      To put it another way, the mouse is a device you can use to point to a virtual terminal in which you wish to type.

      --
      We often refuse to accept an idea merely because the tone of voice in which it has been expressed is unsympathetic to us
    2. Re:Too extreme by lahvak · · Score: 1

      I use mouse to select windows, but with fvwm2, you can create shortcuts for that, too. I have edge-scroll disabled, since I find it annoying that sometimes when I just push the mouse out of the way on my desk, with edge-scroll, fvwm2 switches to a different virtual desktop. I switch desktops with keyboard. And I have my key-binding configured so the are as vi-like as possible.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Too extreme by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I early one made the decision to use fvwm2 with mouse, so I have edge-scroll, point to focus and autoraiser. The nice thing is indeed that you can do without mouse as well. I do selection of virtual screens both with edge-scroll and ctrl-arrow.

      What I find really surprising is that the supposedly "modern" options do not have these features and do not offer this level of configurability. True, it takes a while until you have what you want, but you never need to change it again and features do not vanish or change on you, like with the "modern" stuff.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Too extreme by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  33. Re:all the time by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Some Wal-Marts, such as the inside-the-Perimeter ones in Atlanta, do close at night.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  34. Re:all the time by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

    ...or a 7-11?

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  35. Re:RE GUI vs Keyboard by kevinmenzel · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding me? Things like, oh for example the Ribbon interface in Office 2010 make using just a keyboard even EASIER. EVERYTHING is accessible by keyboard, with key combinations that could be memorized, as opposed to having to navigate menus with the keyboard for anything where there wasn't an assigned keyboard shortcut.

  36. Re:Windows? by cynyr · · Score: 1

    HMM? almost every linux program has extensive keybindings, and there are a few "use keys to move the mouse pointer" programs around.

    --
    All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  37. Re:Windows? by cynyr · · Score: 1

    try pmount for umounting next time

    --
    All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  38. Naturally by Arker · · Score: 1

    I dont think I have even seen a router with a mouse plugged in.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  39. Pfft! Im doing by Roachie · · Score: 1

    ... one week NO MONITOR juta sdf agah!!!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  40. He should have used... by dazst · · Score: 1
  41. As a blind Windows/Linux user... by GarrettK18 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Yes, it is completely possible to do so. There are even built-in shortcuts to do just about everything (desktop, start menu, application navigation mechanisms, ETC)... and that's not even getting into all the stuff a screen reader gives you, like the ability to inspect the screen with a "flat review cursor." Then there are all sorts of fun things like "spell word", ETC.

    It's also possible to use a computer soully with a refreshable braille display device, though it gets aggrivating, and there's no way in hell I'd do it for a week.

    On the Linux side of things, the accessibility is far worse than in Windows, but Gnome provides a lot of the same types of keyboard navigation mechanisms as Windows (Orca doesn't work on KDE, sadly).

    1. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Hi, I have to ask, was "soully" spelled by you or the computer? The spelling I expected was "solely". (Apologies if you interpret this negatively, I'm merely curious, and am halfway to your condition.) I would also ask if that refreshable braille display device was like the one shown in "Covert Affairs" (Auggie the character is blind; played by the actor Christopher Gorham, who was Jake 2.0)? I say "would" because you've likely never seen the show... But perhaps others reading this have?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by GarrettK18 · · Score: 1
      No, that was my brain going on autopilot. Sometimes, for words I don't use often or when my fingers get ahead of my brain, I end up substituting homophones... which are a bitch, btw, if you're only using speech.

      As for my braille display, I'm using the Focus 40 Blue, mainly because it was cheap (for the government agency who bought it for me), and it's made by the same company that produces my screen reader. It's currently in my office, where I do most of my programming work. Never heard of the show you referenced, sadly.

    3. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      Never bug the blind about spelling, unless you want to burn in hell. If it sounds the same when spoken by their TTS engine, chances are they wont do letter by letter navigation over at dicionary.com to get it exactly right. Just read it phonetically and move on.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    4. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by idji · · Score: 1

      I am stunned to hear that Linux support is worse than Windows. I hate the mouse and am a Windows user.

    5. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by GarrettK18 · · Score: 1

      What's really worse is the screen reading ability of Linux and Unix-like systems. If you just nee to use the keyboard for stuff, you may be able to.

    6. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      ...and you call yourself a geek. (I.e., your response to questioning my world is "STFU".)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorry about that. I wanted to take it back just after I'd hit "submit". Let me offer a more constructive reply. I personally find some blind people have outstanding spelling, and make superb proof-readers. For one thing, many can listen super fast to a document and detect if any sentence sounds wrong while our eyes tend to correct spelling on the fly and cause people to miss mistakes. On the other hand, unless they spell character by character, which is slow and painful, they wood knot fined any errors hear. I am somewhat bitter about central vision loss, which I hope explains rather than excuses my previous reply. However, I still see well enough to read slowly, and so I see a lot of mistakes in Skype when IM-ing with the blind. In general, I only point out spelling mistakes if it's likely they will repeat it in group e-mails and it's important, like a name people wont recognise (Cena vs Sina, for example). Names are very tough for them, though frankly English could be a lot simpler to spell. It's not like they learn to spell by reading, like the rest of us, unless they read Braille, which most blind kids today do not (a big mistake IMO).

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    8. Re:As a blind Windows/Linux user... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks; accepted. One eye dead at birth, here. I am also sensitive to the issue; I find, however, that I can see typos extremely well "with remaining eye." Even one space after a period is apparent (when the rest of the doc uses two spaces, that is). I'm sure it's teachable -- "here's a pointed stick; choose the correct eye..." :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  42. Re:Windows? by yincrash · · Score: 1

    Yeah, individual apps might be keyboard friendly, but OSX itself is far from it. I would say it's worse than linux in that regard.

  43. Re:Windows? by adolf · · Score: 1

    that's an Ubuntu problem, not a "Linux" problem. There are Linux distros that are accessibility-friendly. Pure, raw, actual Linux doesn't really have a gui anyway.

    But I thought Ubuntu was supposed to be the most accessible of the Linux distributions!

    (Note for the humor-impaired: Yes, it's a pun.)

    (Note for the those that have a well-developed sense of humor: No, it's not a very good pun.)

    (And a note from me, the pedant: Pure, raw, actual Linux doesn't have any sort of user interface at all!, except for perhaps the Magic SysRq key.)

  44. Re:Windows? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    I liked the Amiga's solution: Holding down one of the Amiga keyboard buttons turned the cursor keys into a virtual mouse

    You can do the same in X, with shift-numlock. Recent versions will require an xorg.conf option to enable it however.

    BTW, what's with X.org shipping broken by default these days? You have to add options to enable basic functionality like mousekeys or ctrl-alt-backspace. Lame.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  45. Re:Windows? by GarrettK18 · · Score: 1

    control-f2, at least when running VoiceOver. Not sure how to do it if you have working eyeballs and no need for a screen reader.

  46. Re:Windows? by GarrettK18 · · Score: 1

    If you're in classic view (i.e. no unity), press control-alt-d to get to the desktop. Navigate to the drive icon, then press the "Applications Key" (usually to the right of the right alt key), then down arrow to "eject drive" or "safely eject drive."

  47. Re:Windows? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    System Preferences .... > Keyboard > Keyboard shortcuts.

    You can choose to move focus to the menu bar, dock, cycle through window focus, focus on the tool bar, next window in the application, status menu (the right part of the menu bar). Also lets you change tab settings at the bottom. If it's a menu option in an app, you can assign a key to it.
    Should look like this

    Also in dialog boxes: A "Command-$$" will select the dialog entry starting with $$ letter.
    Say the save dialog box shows up:
    "Save" "Don't Save" "Cancel". Save is highlighted. So hitting enter will save it.
    Command-D will "Don't Save" it"
    Command-C will "Cancel"
    Command-S will "Save"

  48. Re:Windows? by mattack2 · · Score: 2

    You must not have full keyboard navigation turned on.

    Control-F7, or turn it on in the System Preferences pane.

    Then you can keyboard navigate virtually everything.

    Someone else mentioned the default key for keyboard navigating the menubar, but I have mine customized (also in the Keyboard pref)... since I have the control key where it belongs ("Apple Keyboard" with an ADBUSB converter), it makes things easier to type. ^1 goes to the menubar, ^2 goes to the Dock, ^4 goes to the window toolbar.. I have a few more set up, but mostly the menubar & dock are the ones I use frequently.

  49. Try it in Linux by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    ... fail.

    Supposedly, the operating system that "we" made was supposed to have full keyboard support, so we won't have to leave our beloved home row, right?

    Wrong. I had a mouse go bad one time, and found out just how wrong.

    For starters, just to log off or turn the computer off, you have to click a button in the top panel (in Ubuntu/Gnome), but, although there's a shortcut for the top menu (Alt+F1), you can't get to the panel buttons from there.

    Plenty of other annoyances as well, including being not able (or hardly able) to switch among different sections of a program (such as file browser or web browser) with the keyboard.

    Protip: I think Gnome's supposed to have support for MouseKeys. I used to use it all the time in Windows, but haven't in Ubunutu. In Windows, there's a handy keyboard combo for turning it on and off. Without that, you've disabled your numpad.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Try it in Linux by nzac · · Score: 1

      Set-up a short cut to open a terminal emulator of your choice and you have more than you need. Alt-F2 also works.

      Linux destops are designed so you can use your mouse. Window managers are for keyboard.
      Alt-F2
      gnome-terminal
      Enter
      su
      poweroff

      There might be a user executable shut down command but i have yet to find it, chmod does work though.

    2. Re:Try it in Linux by Tooke · · Score: 1

      Try it in Linux ... fail.

      perhaps a more appropriate subject would be "Try it in gnome". I find Linux to be very usable without a mouse, but I don't use gnome.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    3. Re:Try it in Linux by chammy · · Score: 1

      alt-f2 > gksu halt

      Is probably easier

    4. Re:Try it in Linux by nzac · · Score: 1

      You need to have that installed but yes it would be. Its not even in my default repos.

      found a script that works without root.
      https://gist.github.com/988104
      Says is calls what gnome does to shut-down without privateers.

    5. Re:Try it in Linux by dissy · · Score: 1

      You should check out the rat poison window manager.

      If you've ever used screen in a console, you'll be right at home. Where screen uses control-a, ratpoison uses control-t.

      Keyboard commands for everything, and no mouse support!

      As for the shutdown command, the proper way is shutdown -h now
      (-h to halt, -r to reboot)
      Of course you can also just run 'halt' to shut down with less typing.

    6. Re:Try it in Linux by nzac · · Score: 1

      Dont know how universal it is but this line works on my desktop without privileges
      dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit /org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Manager org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.Stop
      bung it inside a shell script and you don’t need root. Replace stop with restart to restart.

      Though when I think about the best short-cut is the power button outside or inside of X it will at least open the shut-down dialogue.

      P.S. No real interest in loosing my mouse.

    7. Re:Try it in Linux by isorox · · Score: 1

      You should check out the rat poison window manager.

      If you've ever used screen in a console, you'll be right at home. Where screen uses control-a

      And it's really annoying. Outside of screen, ctrl-a (by default) jumps to the front of the line (I love vim, but can't get my head arround set -o vi).

      In screen, ctrl-a enters command mode, I'm often halfway through editing the line before I realise what's happened. Sure I could remap, on hundereds of servers, but then it becomes non-standard and is more likely to catch me out when I get to a server that doesn't have the remapping.

    8. Re:Try it in Linux by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      Use awesome.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    9. Re:Try it in Linux by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Exactly! In fact, it is one of the reasons I don't use Gnome.

      --
      AccountKiller
    10. Re:Try it in Linux by dissy · · Score: 1

      And it's really annoying. Outside of screen, ctrl-a (by default) jumps to the front of the line (I love vim, but can't get my head arround set -o vi)

      True, it does take some getting used to.
      Control-a a is how to do a literal control-a for line editing. But as you say, if you aren't watching and don't realize it for a number of keystrokes, all sorts of havoc can be wrought.

      Then to be extra confusing, there is control-a control-a, which is basically 'switch to last window'
      Really handy as a 'boss' key however when you need to quickly jump back to the window running the compile ;}

  50. Re:Windows? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    Specifically, for either the Menubar or the Dock, you hit the hotkey, then use arrows or type-selection to navigate to specific items, and space to 'hit' the currently selected item.

  51. Re:Windows? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    It appears that Ctrl-Alt-D was the shortcut I was missing. In Windows 7 I too do not know how to get to the desktop with keyboard shortcuts (in Win XP IIRC it was Win, Esc, Tab; hm something similar works in W7 too), but raw window of Explorer is sufficient (where from you can navigate e.g. to computer management).

    Otherwise, Linux, or X Window System, is probably the most keyboard unfriendly environment I have ever encountered. KDE 3.x in my past experience was OK (they mimic Windows a lot, also in keyboard shortcut aspects; no experience with KDE4), but GNOME based systems not once have failed me in keyboard department in past (my departure from GNOME (1.4) was largely due to removal of keyboard shortcuts altogether in GNOME 2.0; IceWM FTW!).

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  52. VoiceOver on MacOS X by gkearney · · Score: 1

    The blind and some print disabled use computers all the time without a mouse. On MacOS X and the iOS there is a built in screen reader called VoiceOver (started with a command-F5 on a standard keyboard function-command-F5 on portables. With VoiceOver running you can work the OS with no mouse, or for that matter even a screen attached. It also support a wide range of braille displays.

    There is similar products for Windows but they are not built into the OS and some, JAWS and WindowEyes for example, can cost more than the computer they run on.

    On on the whole this is a rather silly question which if the authors had asked the question "How do the blind use a computer?" would have been answered.

    Gregory Kearney
    Manager - Accessible Media
    Association for the Blind of Western Australia
    61 Kitchener Avenue, PO Box 101
    Victoria Park 6979, WA Australia

    Telephone: +61 (08) 9311 8246
    Telephone: +1 (307) 224 4022 (North America)
    Fax: +61 (08) 9361 8696
    Toll free: 1800 658 388 (Australia only)
    Email: gkearney@gmail.com

  53. Re:Windows? by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

    Who still wants a keyboard with a numpad?

    Me. I don't know about you, but when typing numbers (especially several in a row), NOTHING beats the number pad. The only devices I find it acceptable to go without a numpad is when using devices that omit it for space reasons. Which would be... netbooks. I wouldn't want to use a calculator program without it... which effectively makes netbooks lousy as portable calculators.

  54. Re:Windows? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Windows is actually mostly OK w/o mouse. Most MSFT applications are quite keyboard friendly.
    Yes, and thank goodness for the keyboard shortcuts. When MSFT made all of their applications with the "Windows 7" look, they managed to add an extra mouse click to everything you want to do, and also managed to hide most of the common features that you might use in Word or Excel. Fortunately, the keyboard shortcuts are still the same.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  55. Re:Windows? by GarrettK18 · · Score: 1
    In Windows, it's windows key-m or windows key-d.

    Again, unfortunately the only GUI environments that are accessible in Linux are Gnome and LXDE, and maybe parts of XFCE (I'm not that brave though).

  56. I do it all the time by Tooke · · Score: 1

    But in Linux, of course. I use Arch Linux with the ratpoison tiling window manager. For web browsing I use firefox with the pentadactyl addon. pentadactyl (a fork of vimperator) gives firefox a modal interface like vim, along with the vim keybindings of course. I almost switched to chrome before I found that addon. apart from firefox, the only gui apps that I use are a few lightweight ones for dealing with pdf/media, such as apvlv (a pdf viewer with vi keybindings) and sxiv (an image viewer, also with some vi keybindings). for nearly everything else, I use the command line. MPD + MPC for music, mplayer for movies, mutt for email, vim of course, etc. the only time I ever use a mouse is for a few web apps (mainly google maps).

    I wouldn't even bother if I wasn't using linux though. Windows and OS X are built with the mouse in mind, and they just aren't as configurable. I would still use pentadactyl, but that's about it. I do commend the author for trying such a feat though. I'd hate to have to deal with windows without a mouse.

    also, anyone else out there use the dvorak layout? I switched in december and am up to about 80 WPM now. I actually use a variant called programmer dvorak (and with the caps lock and left control key switched). It really is great, I love the keyboard.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  57. Re:Windows? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    I found the command key plus number better than alt tab, and alt f then arrows fine on the rate occasion I needed access the system part of the menu in 11.04. Command plus typing was decent too (making me but need alt f2).

      The only place windows wind in window management is command plus arrows for window management in windows 7

    As for ejecting, you have a point.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  58. Re:Windows? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    Essentially, it went like Alt-F2, xterm, sync, etc, shutdown -h how.

    Um, how do you shut down? :)

    Seriously, though, Microsoft seems to be losing it lately; I have two examples.

    First, the scroll wheel often doesn't work in some of the Management Console applets. That's a huge usability fail. (Even though I prefer not to use the mouse.)

    The second is that in recent OS and Office, there are more than one accelerator with the same key, requiring the user to hit <key>, then Enter, in order to complete an action that previously required just <key>. This cuts user productivity in half! (For that function.)

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  59. Lotus Notes by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

    F5 will refreshes everything.... except Notes. F9? WTF? It's the keyboarding equivalent of being the only airplane where yanking back on the yoke makes a nose dive.

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  60. Re:Windows? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    "Windows is FAR better than Linux in the run-the-GUI-with-keyboard-only department."

    That MAY have been true early on but it simply isn't any more. I frankly don't see much of a difference feature-wise between Windows, MacOS, or Linux. Gnome and KDE have all the KB features Windows does. Also given the fact that you can re-map the entire keyboard in all three OS's the differences aren't really all that different. It simply isn't significant to point out the differences between the 3 platforms anymore.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  61. Firefox + gestures + OS X by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 2

    Many may already know this, but I thought I would post anyways... if you want to make greater use of gestures while browsing, and use Firefox, see the article here...

    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=737074

    There are assignable gestures hidden in about:config, and browsing is so much better once you find some customized combinations that you like. Here are the ones that I have altered and find helpful:
    Swipe down: new tab
    Swipe up: go home
    Pinch in: close tab
    Pinch out: toggle between full screen/not full screen
    Rotate right: reload
    Rotate left: undo close tab (for those times you accidentally pinch in)

    --
    Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    1. Re:Firefox + gestures + OS X by mario_grgic · · Score: 2

      Firefox with Pentadactyl for true VIM like experience while browsing the web.

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  62. Re:Windows? by prowler1 · · Score: 1

    Have you seen the 'Awesome' window manager? If you look at its home page at http://awesome.naquadah.org/ you will notice one of its features is 'No mouse needed: everything can be performed with keyboard;'.

    Don't get me wrong, I also liked the fact the Amiga let me move the pointer via the keyboard, hell it saved my ass when I killed my rodent once but to say Linux sucks with running a GUI with only a keyboard when solutions such as Awesome exist is a bit of an over simplification.

  63. Re:Windows? by Fallingwater · · Score: 1

    I use CrunchBang, a modified Debian Squeeze distro that is almost entirely controlled by keyboard shortcuts. Sure, you use the mouse as normal for browsing and all that, but the interface is keyboard-based.
    I'm not sure if Windows can be customized like that, but it almost certainly takes a lot more work.

  64. tabbing between fields is a problem area by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    The most annoying thing to me are web forms or applications with bizarre tab orders. (Even the "helpful" ones that move your focus after you fill the field are annoying since you might type your area code, hit tab for the next field, but end up at the field for last 4 digits.)

    I won't even delve into the horror that is non-standard gui/keyboard implementations in flash interfaces.

    1. Re:tabbing between fields is a problem area by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Or worse, when the javascript prevents you from shift-tabbing to correct a mistake. As soon as you focus to the box, the javascript moves focus to the next box. Your only choice is to use the mouse to select the text.

  65. Re:Windows? by EvanED · · Score: 1

    It's fantastic, even the keyboard is useless.

    That's not true at all! You still get SysRq!

  66. Re:Windows? by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the information.
    I wonder why on earth is that not on by default?

  67. Hiho Mousketeers!! by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

    Who's the leader of the band that made for you and me? M-I-C-K-EY M-O-U-S-E! Mickey Mouse. KEYBOARDS SUCK! Mickey Mouse. WTF?! Forever we will point until we die. HI HI HI! HEY there! HI there! HO there you're as welcome as can be. M-I-C-K-EY M-O-U-S-E!

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    1. Re:Hiho Mousketeers!! by gtall · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...we are to gather from your comments that using a mouse is somehow infantile while learning a bunch of arcane bespeaks of intelligence? Why would you think that? Have you nothing better to do with your time than bang around on keyboard? And do you find this fulfilling?

    2. Re:Hiho Mousketeers!! by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...we are to gather from your comments that using a mouse is somehow infantile while learning a bunch of arcane bespeaks of intelligence?

      Hmmmmm...no moreso than we should assume from you condescending questions that you are a humorless douchebag, professor. I'm sure you're a barrel of laughs and the life of every party. It's was a joke. Lighten up.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  68. Re:Windows? by EvanED · · Score: 1

    Oh, now that I read the rest of his comment, adolph beat me to the punch. Oh well.

  69. Re:RE GUI vs Keyboard by znerk · · Score: 1

    When Microsoft started Windows, that was also true. There were rules for how to
    do GUI stuff and if you implemented that "GUI stuff" you also had to implement
    the keyboard version of the navigations.

    Are you kidding me? Things like, oh for example the Ribbon interface in Office 2010 make using just a keyboard even EASIER. EVERYTHING is accessible by keyboard, with key combinations that could be memorized, as opposed to having to navigate menus with the keyboard for anything where there wasn't an assigned keyboard shortcut.

    Except you didn't read the above comment, and responded as if you thought it said the exact opposite of what it actually says... Originally, *everything* had an ALT+Key combination... The magic ribbon didn't actually change anything, it just utilized the previously arranged instruction set. In other words, there was no "navigating menus" once you understood the keyboard combinations. The magic ribbon just changed the "look and feel" of the interface, and alienated anyone who had gotten used to the old way of doing things.

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  70. Re:Windows? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Who still wants a keyboard with a numpad?

    Every scientist, engineer, businessperson, or individual who thinks quantitatively and likes to do math in real life.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  71. Re:Windows? by anagama · · Score: 1

    Who still wants a keyboard with a numpad?

    Hey man, thanks for tossing out the Model-M I bought for $5 at a junk store (and thanks to the proprietor who didn't know what he had and just stacked it with the rest of the $5 keyboards).

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  72. Re:Windows? by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

    Perhaps using OSX without a mouse is considered "doing it the wrong way"?

    Well, that excuse worked last time ...

  73. Keyboard shortcuts for mice in many places by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Enlightenment was designed to deal with that as were several other window managers in the decade+ since. The clue is to actually look at a list of keyboard shortcuts in your environment of choice and if they even have mouse movements in there you know it has been dealt with. I never said easy or ideal, just that you can get away without a mouse even when running a program that is designed to be operated only by mouse.

  74. My God. by bitoffish · · Score: 1

    Who cares.

  75. Next week... by Megahard · · Score: 1

    No keyboard, just mouse.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:Next week... by Animats · · Score: 1

      No keyboard, just mouse.

      The original Macintosh could be usefully run that way.

    2. Re:Next week... by pz · · Score: 1

      Except when it came to entering text. Yes, it's possible. No, I would never, ever want to enter anything other than a few words in that manner. Certainly nothing like a 10,000 word paper, which can easily be done without touching a mouse, ever, at least on my computers.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Next week... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      yea mac also default installed speech and that was awesome too

      IMO KMA cause on screen buttons were nothing new by the time jeobs showed up

    4. Re:Next week... by ToronadoCheese · · Score: 1

      And the week after, no screen, just keyboard and mouse.

  76. Re:Fucking windows key by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Why did you buy a keyboard with a "Windows" key on it, then? Are you just looking for some reason to bitch? I'm typing on a keyboard with no "Windows" or "Start" key on it right now.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  77. Fucking noobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Learn how to use a computer, and your Windows key can be used for whatever you want.

    But I forget, things were better when there was a giant fucking empty space between ctrl and alt! I MEAN LOL U CULD PUT A FAKE 'PANIC' KEY THERE HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

    1. Re:Fucking noobs. by Rizimar · · Score: 1

      Why would he need a fake panic key? Looks like his Windows key has caused him enough real panic as it is!

  78. No Monitor Next Week by SumterLiving · · Score: 2

    Kevin is a wimp. Next week I go 1 week with just a keyboard and mouse. No monitor or computer.

  79. Re:Fucking windows key by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Well allocating the whole alphabet would be dumb I think. A good keyboard interface would not do "Windows+letter" combos, they'd have different combos, some longer keystrokes for more options, a key vastly easier to hit than Windows or Command, etc.

    The "Windows+letter" combo is only used for menu shortcuts from all I've seen. And that's where the design fails. They start with the GUI menu _first_ and then map hotkeys to that so that the result is something clumsy.

  80. Re:Fucking windows key by Da+Cheez · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you only found one shortcut for the Windows key? I find that surprising. There are quite a few more: Win+Arrow Keys can be used for window management (only in 7, to my knowledge), Win+R opens a run dialog, Win+D takes you to the desktop, Win+F opens a search window for the system, Win+E opens an Explorer window, Win+Break opens System Properties, Win+Spacebar peaks at the desktop (only in 7, to my knowledge), and Win+L locks the currently logged in account (useful if you live in a dorm or other environment where people like to mess with your system when you step away for a moment). There are many others, but these are the ones I find most useful. YMMV. I'm not sure what other simple key combinations could be used for the same functionality. And if you're using Mac OS or Linux with that Windows keyboard, it works as the command key or super key. So yeah, I'd say it can be quite useful.

  81. Vi? by birukun · · Score: 1

    What's EMACS?

    I thought you meant vi....

    --
    Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
  82. Re:Windows? by ryanov · · Score: 2

    My new laptop has no NUMLOCK key, you insensitive clod!

    Yes, seriously. Weird, eh?

  83. Re:Windows? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    I think because some people are "confused" by the focus ring.

  84. Re:Windows? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    Windows is FAR better than Linux

    WARNING: Trigger phrase detected. Ninja assassins dispatched.

  85. Re:Windows? by jascat · · Score: 1

    Macbooks don't have them or their bluetooth wireless keyboard. I find it quite annoying.

  86. Re:Windows? by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

    It turns out that the blind who use both Windows and Linux extensively don't use the mouse at all. Linux has an awesome screen reader, Orca, which currently only works with Gnome (sorry KDE - but maybe soon?). It works, but basic crap like the GTK calendar control and icons in tables are not accessible at all, not due to Orca, but due to lack of caring about accessibility across the Gnome groups, especially the GTK+ team. Windows wins (sorry Linux). This is because that great evil man Bill Gates actually does have a heart, and made sure Windows was accessible far before Linux or Mac. If you want to know how to use a computer without a mouse, just ask a blind computer geek. It's Windows, man, which totally sucks.

    --
    Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
  87. Re:all the time by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    I will not own another wireless keyboard or mouse again. Ever.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  88. Can't work with trackpad by csumpi · · Score: 1

    I can't do any real work with a trackpad. Compared to a mouse, I find the trackpad inferior for text editing, it's useless with photoshop, 3d modeling application and games (not that games constitute work, unless one's making them). For most stuff (other than web browsing) even on my laptop I use a mouse.

    On a side note, of all the laptops in the house (new macbook air, sony, toshiba, acer netbook) I actually find the apple trackpad the hardest to use because of the virtual buttons.

    Unless by "work" you mean browsing the internet, I don't get it. Maybe I'm missing something?

    1. Re:Can't work with trackpad by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      On the contrary I find the trackpad way better for text editing than the mouse, partly for two finger scrolling, partly because of the increased accuracy.

      For photoshop, it's 6 of one half a dozen of the other – I'd rather have a graphics tablet than either.

      For 3D modelling, again I prefer the trackpad massively.

      That said – I even use a mouse to play some games – occasionally when I'm being lazy ever FPSes – believe it or not, it works well enough to be passable.

      Must really be a case of each to their own though – I find the Apple trackpads infinitely superior to any other I've ever used.

    2. Re:Can't work with trackpad by LoganDzwon · · Score: 1

      I can't do any real work with a mouse. Compared to a muti touchpad, I find the mouse inferior for text editing, it's useless with photo editing, and casual games (not FPS type games, although I personally feel a console is better for those anyway.) For most stuff, even on my desktop I use a muti touchpad.

      On a side note, of all the computers I've ever used (to long to list 20 year history of PC use) I actually find the apple muti touch mouse the easiest mouse to use because of the touch inputs.

      Different stroke for different folks? I've heard what your saying before, so I know there are many people that feel like you do, but I've found once I adjusted, it's quite the opposite. Unless so many people are just resistant to learning something better, I don't get it. Maybe I'm missing something?

    3. Re:Can't work with trackpad by sco08y · · Score: 1

      For me, work is mostly coding and writing, which is effectively browsing + text editing.

      I think I'd want a tablet with a stylus for Photoshop, but I've never done that seriously. The only tablet I've tried, Wacom Bamboo, was a real disappointment, and not cheap either.

      For games, I use a mouse with mappable buttons.

  89. Re:Windows? by lucm · · Score: 1

    > Every scientist, engineer, businessperson, or individual who thinks quantitatively and likes to do math in real life.

    I am not sure if by inference this would include network administrators... but in any case, managing routing rules without a numpad would be insane (and possibly unhealthy)

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  90. Re:Windows? by ergean · · Score: 1

    Well said! And if we are at keys we need - I'll never buy a keyboard without the INS/Delete HOME/END PageUp/PageDown keys.
    Probably I'm too fucking old - but I love my Ctrl/Shift+Insert and can't stand ctrl+x/c/v.

  91. They do not have to be by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    iOS has really excellent support for the disabled, built in screen reading and everything. You might think the blind could not use a touchscreen well but the devices are small enough it's easy to get position right.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They do not have to be by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      You mean, "excellent" with nothing the very poor excuse for an input dev I'm complaining about? For a non-blind person, a touch screen keyboard might be adequate for naming a contact in a phone book, but not much more.

      On N900, I write long SQL queries and do minor system administration when away from a regular computer. In fact, I gave up using laptops for that, I'm either at home or in office and want a comfortable screen and keyboard, or on the move and can't stand lugging a huge thing. Are you saying this is doable on a touch screen?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:They do not have to be by Pope · · Score: 1

      Actually it sounds like you're the ideal candidate for a netbook. Trying that on an iOS device? No way I'd recommend that solution.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:They do not have to be by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      A netbook has to be lugged in a bag, you can put n900 into a pocket.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  92. Re:Windows? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    I would assume it is because it adds a bunch of complexity to the user interface together with what is basically a feature the vast majority of users simply won't use.

    So you can turn it on but it defaults to being turned off. A reasonable compromise.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  93. PUSSY by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    I traded in a desktop cga xt with a 14.4 modem for a mono vga 386 nec laptop with broken screen hinges and no mouse. 2 years later fuck it! windows is braindead for the keyboard enabled

    ctrl alt windows bullshit, nothing special

  94. Re:Fucking windows key by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    as am I and I do not miss it a bit

    course I dont use windows on a regular basis so I really dont care about win+R for a run command, or find, or show desktop, or instant file browser ... etc that no one in their right mind could ever possibly find useful according to the op that cant read a whole page of html nor install anything but windows ...

  95. Re:Windows? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Windows is one of the easiest operating systems to navigate without a mouse. Just try to do that with an X interface you self important fucktard.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  96. Re:Windows? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    hold shift, press left or right arrow to highlight. press context key, or use bold hotkey.

    You people are morons.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  97. Re:Windows? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Except they tend to suck ass because they're designed by people with no concept of usability.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  98. Re:Windows? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    command-shift-/ then press left/right/up/down arrows. Enter to select.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  99. Re:Windows? by buglista · · Score: 1

    Bah! I've got two degrees in "math" as you call it. You can do /arithmetic/ on a keypad, but you can't solve a 17-variable PDE or prove the Contraction Mapping Theorem.

  100. Help please. by Tei · · Score: 1

    I use to own a XP. and Is easy to shutdown it using only the keyboard. Even with the monitor off. I have done it daily. Something like "ctrl+esc up enter right enter"

    Now I "upgraded" to Windows 7, and the same key combo don't seems to work. Any suggestion? What combinations of keys will result on W7 to shutdown?

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

    1. Re:Help please. by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Ctrl-esc (or Windows key), then right arrow, enter. My system didn't even ask for confirmation.

      Or ctrl-esc, right, right, R (restart)/H (hybernate)/S (sleep)/W (switch user)/L (log off)/O (lock)

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  101. Re:Fucking windows key by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Where'd you buy it? I'm curious. As much as I'd like one of those awesome IBM keyboards, my laptop came with a Windows[tm] key and there was no model that didn't.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  102. Re:ctl + F, then escape, enter, for links in brows by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    When I read the title and summary I immediately imagined browsing the web to be tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, tab, shift-tab, shift-tab, enter, repeat. This method makes a bit more sense.

  103. Re:Windows? by edumacator · · Score: 1

    Jokes come in all shapes and sizes. Some are even ugly and dumb.

  104. OS wide vim mode by Dersaidin · · Score: 1

    I would like to see a window environment that offers command mode like vim. For example, all controls in currently focused window should have a line number faintly visible (one number per line for text boxes with multiple lines). You can highlight change focus to a particular control like changing to a line in vim: `:12` Tightly packed stuff such as buttons on a tool bar might only one number, with decimal values for the things inside it (or a number each, whatever). You would only need to show the number every 8 buttons or something, people can count the sequence between. ctrl+w, hjlk for window selection... etc And while we're at it, repurpose that useless scroll-lock key to toggle to vim mode, so power users can quickly turn it on when they sit down at any computer.

    1. Re:OS wide vim mode by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy just to be able to have vim anywhere text can be typed in/edited. I'd pay good money for VIM system wide.

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  105. I stopped using a mouse in 1998... by Sam+H · · Score: 1

    ... but still use my favourite analog pointing device, thanks to ThinkPads and the awesome trackpoint-enabled ThinkPad USB keyboard.

    --
    God, root, what is difference ?
    1. Re:I stopped using a mouse in 1998... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Damn, they removed the built-in USB hub on the newer model -- a dealbreaker for me. Will get the older one either on ebay or something, even if 'pre-owned'.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  106. Re:Windows? by gtall · · Score: 1

    No, most of us cannot be bothered learning a buttload of inane key bindings. Maybe for some repetitive things, but in general, I have more important things to keep in my head.

  107. Re:ctl + F, then escape, enter, for links in brows by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

    I think you misspelled "fap, fap, fap, ..., fap" there...

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  108. Re:Windows? by smuggl3r · · Score: 2

    Well, yeah. He used a mainstream OS instead of an obscure 1% market share OS. What so strange in that?

  109. Re:Windows? by starsky51 · · Score: 1

    Who still wants a keyboard with a numpad?

    The numpad is the only way I can play Nethack. I could never get to grips with those VIM keys.

    --
    There are 2 types of people in this world. Those who understand ternary and those who don't.
  110. Re:Windows? by Sique · · Score: 1

    Every scientist, engineer, businessperson, or individual who thinks quantitatively and likes to do math in real life, who is not lefthanded.

    There, fixed that for you.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  111. Re:my usual practice by Lennie · · Score: 1

    Doesn't work in Firefox 7 either.

    Ahh, the benefits of running dailybuilds. :-)

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
  112. Re:Windows? by ais523 · · Score: 1

    Try Fn+7/8/9/u/o/j/k/l (and Fn-i to click), that works on my (Ubuntu 10.04) laptop. I think it's being converted to numlock-based or at least keypad-based codes behind the scenes. (You have to turn "Pointer can be controlled using the keypad" on in Assistive Technologies | Keyboard Preferences first, but that can be done entirely using keyboard shortcuts; the "System" menu can be opened via Alt-F1, Right, Right.)

    --
    (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  113. Re:Windows? by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Except they tend to suck ass because they're designed by people with no concept of usability.

    And that's the perennial problem with open source. Usability is often an afterthought and as a result open source apps suffer by comparison to their commercial counterparts. One of the best things to have happened in the last few years is that usability has become a lot more prominent in projects like GNOME, Firefox, Ubuntu and the results are there to see. Other apps like Open/LibreOffice, GIMP, Eclipse would all benefit from their own usability makeover.

  114. Re:Windows? by Talderas · · Score: 1

    Assuming the app developer properly set up tabbing in the fields....

    I've messed with some .NET apps where I can tell what order the developer added fields and rearranged them because he like the ordering better based on how the cursor jumped around the fields.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  115. Not possible in my case by necro81 · · Score: 1

    While I use keyboard shortcuts for a whole lot of things in my day-to-day computing, it would not be possible for me to do my work without a mouse. Why? I do a fair bit of CAD, using software like Pro/E and Solidworks. Quite simply, there is no way to create or manipulate those 3D objects without a mouse. You could get far with the keyboard for viewing objects, and both of those CAD applications make extensive use of (heavily customizable) shortcuts for creating and executing features, but a lot of core operations (sketching, selecting, etc.) can only be done with a mouse.

  116. Re:Windows? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    I was about to mention Nethack as well. I can't stand vi-key movement controls in it...and I even use vim as my editor. That's right...I use my cursor keys in vim.

  117. GUI is supposed to use input devices by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    The entire point of a GUI is to facilitate input devices like mice, keyboards, trackpads, those pen-thingies, trackballs, etc. For example, I use a mouse and a trackpad (running Lion dev 4) because of the various gestures available with those two device. In addition, I use a keyboard, because it's the best way to input text (duh).

    People who complain about GUIs and lament the diminishing use of the command line are doing so because of a poorly designed GUIs or personal baggage they bring to the plate. Of course people are going to prefer the way they know, even if it isn't as good as the new way.

    Of course command line is better for some things for some people, but the overwhelming majority of things average users do with a computer are better achieved via a GUI. There's no shame in using a GUI and there's no extra nerd cred for going command line, because being a geek stopped being new about 15 years ago.

  118. Re:Windows? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    There are Linux distros that are accessibility-friendly.

    For example?

    I have yet to see a single GUI-based distro boasting that it is keyboard friendly out of box.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  119. Re:Fucking windows key by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    The real problem with the Windows key is it doesn't make it easy to figure out the keystrokes, because if you press it without pressing another key, it opens the stupid start menu. This causes new users to think that's the only thing that key is used for.

    And there's nothing in the file menus to tell you the win + key shortcuts.

  120. Re:Windows? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    that's an Ubuntu problem, not a "Linux" problem. There are Linux distros that are accessibility-friendly. Pure, raw, actual Linux doesn't really have a gui anyway.

    But I thought Ubuntu was supposed to be the most accessible of the Linux distributions!

    :)

    Actually, I think those are bad genes, inherited from X Window System. In past I have tried to use bare X + WM without mouse. Pretty soon I have found that it is not possible at all: X requires mouse, most X applications simply do not have any keyboard shortcuts (e.g. editres or xedit). So I found a spare one. Only to find 15 minutes later that X requires 3-button mouse. And I had only spare 2-button mice.

    The thing is that most distros, Ubuntu included, target the group of users to whom it is actually keyboard which is optional. Windows historically targeted gov'ts and thus had to provide the full (keyboard) accessibility out of box: yes, there are people who have disruption of motor skills and can't use mice.

    Anyway, I mostly work in shell anyway, I'm over the toying with Ubuntu, and back in the Aptosid.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  121. Re:Windows? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    My new laptop has no NUMLOCK key, you insensitive clod!

    Yes, seriously. Weird, eh?

    But does it have a separate numeric keypad?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  122. Re:Windows? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    Huh, crazy. You learn something new every day. I assume this is specific to Gnome but I could be wrong. In any case, this message was entered with no mouse interaction at all from Ubuntu 11.04.

    (BTW, plus seems to be "click".)

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  123. Re:Windows? by phlinn · · Score: 1

    They also added the desktop to the alt-tab list.

    --
    "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
  124. Re:Windows? by fusiongyro · · Score: 1
  125. You can do it, but do you really want to by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Used to be, back in the NT4 days, you could get around with just a keyboard quite easily. You can still do it today, but the amount of time you save by using a mouse has increased dramatically. Just think about the web experience today vs 10 years ago. Now some websites have dynamic menus that you have to hover over to select your choices - can't do that with a keyboard. Also, there are many sites that have hundreds of links, would you really want to tab through those when you could just use a mouse to click? And what about tabbed browsing? Now you have to first select the tab you want, before it used to be as simple as Alt - Tab to switch to the browser window that had the site you wanted. Not saying tabbed browsing is a bad thing by any means, but it does make operating with a keyboard a bit more difficult.

  126. Re:Windows? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Macs really don't work well with a keyboard. You can't even navigate drop-down lists in OS X on a keyboard without changing an obscure system preference. There are a lot of programs written with no way to access some controls by keyboard.

  127. Duh by gnujunkie · · Score: 1

    Just type update-rc.d gdm remove (i think its remove don't quote me) and use the shell! I have been using a linux box as my main machine for months without a GUI. Elinks baby! in windows... with choice software and a good memory perhaps

  128. Use an older windows. by bored · · Score: 1

    I find that vista/7 broke a whole bunch of keyboard shortcuts. In the past the OS components used by most win32 apps had a standard set of hotkeys. Now, it seems the new guys doing UI work at MS don't even know what the hotkeys should be so they don't implement them when they choose to rewrite the UI interfaces. Plus the whole alt/vs ctrl argument barely works anymore. In the past, a key to operate globally would be alt and key, the local application equivalent would be ctrl and key. So Alt-f4 was close application windows, where ctrl-f4 was close MDI child/dialog box. Ctrl-tab, change tab/mdi child, alt-tab change application. Before MS decided "hiding" the keyboard shortcuts for menu items was a good default, most applications made it a priority to make sure every menu item had a keyboard shortcuts. Now its not unusual to find applications that just fail to provide any at all.

  129. Re:Fucking windows key by lahvak · · Score: 1

    I have my window manager configured so that all window manager functions are mapped to key combinations that contain the "Windows" key. I think about the picture of window on it as standing for "window manager".

    --
    AccountKiller
  130. Re:Windows? by vux984 · · Score: 1

    No, most of us cannot be bothered learning a buttload of inane key bindings. Maybe for some repetitive things, but in general, I have more important things to keep in my head.

    That's why the mouse should be enabled and working by default.

    That doesn't explain why keyboard navigation is turned off. Having it on doesn't require you to learn or remember anything.

    But it allows power users used to being able to use arcane keyshort cuts like "tab" and "arrow key" to move between fields on a form or dialog box to discover that they work.

    If its off they can't discover it. Except years later as a random tangent on slashdot.

  131. Re:Windows? by GarrettK18 · · Score: 1

    I generally set my theme to "Classic" to avoid that "feature."

  132. "how the F*** do you log off?" this is how. by TRFon · · Score: 1

    shutdown.exe -s -t 00 I just createated a shortcut to this that is alt/ctrl/caps lock. cause,WHO USES CAPS LOCK ANYWAY! ;)

  133. Re:"how the F*** do you log off?" this is how. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    data entry people.
    Some regulations in some industries demand sentence in all caps.
    and so on.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  134. Re:Windows? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    That's why you an customize them.. They're not "inane" if you set them up to be whatever key equivalent makes sense for you.. (But of course, they default to something consistent.)

  135. Re:Fucking windows key by DogDude · · Score: 1

    It's one of those awesome IBM keyboards. Found it at a thrift store for $1. But, a company called "Unicomp" bought the patent and still makes them. You can get knockoffs here: http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  136. pointer vs OS by LoganDzwon · · Score: 1

    When I used to use windows, (I switched to linux shortly before XP came out, and then to mac right after Apple switched to Intel chips,) I used to seldom use the mouse preferring keyboard shortcuts for navigating. With linux I never really got there because each application could implement it's interface so differently. Plus, I was in console the majority of time anyway. With Mac it's a whole different experience. I use the touchpad a lot more then I did in either windows or linux. I also use keyboard shortcuts more then I did in either. People used to say they didn't like only having on button, but I looked it as having one pointer and a whole panel full buttons.

  137. Re:Windows? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
    Pure, raw, actual Linux doesn't have any sort of user interface at all!, except for perhaps the Magic SysRq key

    Indeed - I'm just less direct with my points ;) That said, 99.9999% of the Linux installs I've ever done, didn't even come with XWindows. And 99% of the work I do for my job doesn't involve XWindows; so long as I can count an XTerm as not really...err...XWindows. My desktop has a gui, yes, but just because I like to use graphical web browsers sometimes.

  138. Re:Windows? by toddestan · · Score: 1

    I don't think Apple has ever been big on the numpad as arrows concept. While their older keyboards have num lock, the legends for keys on the numpad only have the numbers printed on them, so it's not obvious what's going to happen when you use them with numlock off, unless you're familiar with PC keyboards. It's not surprising to me that they would totally drop num lock at some point.

  139. Re:Windows? by ryanov · · Score: 1

    No it does not. Dell Latitude E6420. The E6520 has its own numeric keyboard.

  140. Re:Windows? by ryanov · · Score: 1

    What I've since noticed is that using Fn+number keys (the alternate numbers, not the primary top row) does not work on my laptop for typing the numbers (though your mouse trick does work).

  141. Re:RE GUI vs Keyboard by kevinmenzel · · Score: 1
    My recollection of Office 2003 was that not every menu item had a key combination, and certainly not every tool bar had a way to access it via keyboard.

    However, in Office 2010, pretty much everything you can see is keyboard accessible, directly.

    And hence, I was not responding to

    When Microsoft started Windows, that was also true. There were rules for how to do GUI stuff and if you implemented that "GUI stuff" you also had to implement the keyboard version of the navigations.

    but rather

    Over time, Microsoft lost their interest in efficiency of the individual and traded it for the the easiest way for a beginner to use their product.

    because I hardly think that providing keyboard shortcuts for absolutely everything, not to mention some of the other added features, like the advanced paste options that are quickly accessible, actually demonstrates losing interest in the efficiency of the individual. Rather, I think it demonstrates that they care a lot about that, and the reaction against it had very little to do with efficiency, and much more to do with "new is bad".

  142. Re:Windows? by wwphx · · Score: 1

    My MacBook Pro has Num Lock on F6, I can't speak to later models as mine is 4 years old and my wife's, which also has a Num Lock, is 3 years old. I have to keep my function keys enabled for using Win XP under Parallels for work so I have to use the fn key to activate it.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.