Technical Glitch Lets Reporters Eavesdrop On Obama, Sarkozy
Hugh Pickens writes "BBC reports that a technical glitch allowed reporters to listen in on a private conversation between French President Nicolas Sarkozy and US President Barack Obama, made in a backroom meeting at the G20 summit, treating listeners to a rare insight into the importance of personal relationships in international politics. 'I can't stand him any more,' said Mr. Sarkozy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'He's a liar.' Mr. Obama replied: 'You're sick of him. I have to deal with him every day!' According to Reuters, the two presidents were apparently 'unaware that the microphones in their meeting room had been switched on, enabling reporters in a separate location to listen in to a simultaneous translation.' The reporters made 'a group decision... not to report the conversation as it was considered private and off-the-record,' but Arrets Sur Images, a French website that covers current affairs, got wind of the exchange and broke the story."
2 people agree the another is an ass. What is the news?
Fox News will have a fair and balanced field day with this.
None of what these people do should be secret. They shouldn't be allowed anywhere without a number of cameras and microphones on them always and everything should always be transmitted out to the public.
You can't handle the truth.
... or espionage?
Journalism becomes espionage when leaders expect privacy and technology is applied to eavesdrop.
In the movie, he was on a panel of some press conference and after he spoke, he forgot to take off his wireless microphone and headed off the mensroom whereby the sounds of his visit were broadcast over the PA system.
The scene
It's safe for work.
Was this a glitch or was this done on purpose, by the way?
Also this shows the insanity - Obama says Netanyahu is a liar (as if Obama or Sarcozy are not liars), and all of these liars are up there, dealing the cards of nations.
Do you trust any of these people? If you do - you are insane.
Obama will start a war with Iran. Any other candidate will except for two: Ron Paul (and Gary Johnson probably wouldn't either).
It's tiring that all these liars are on top and making all these decisions for nations and economies, etc. Take the power back from them.
You can't handle the truth.
soon will lose its access to major credit cards right?
I guess they are both Nazi's now... /TongueInCheek
More specifically, I don't want to hear Michelle during any - uh - marital affairs.
It could turn me off sex for years. I might need counseling. Oh no, just the thought right now is... ewwwww
We're only pretending to support them, but antisemitism is rising and we have a president who thinks his life would be a lot easier if Israel didn't exist. Guess our loyalty doesn't run very deep.
We once had a college professor who did exactly the same during a break.
Hilarity ensued.
It's just not polite to say it. Just last night they did this bit on House where the guy goes through a litany of truths about the guys fantasizing about having sex with the hot female doctor. Everybody knows it. It's just not polite to say it. Blah, blah, blah.
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
Who'd have guessed?
Surely, this is OK. They had nothing to hide and their conversation was taking place in a public place*, so all's fair.
Definition of "public place" tortured to extend to publically owned buildings as well as places where the public might be allowed.
President Obama should be fine with it, he does support warrantless wiretapping, that's essentially what heppend here.
So did I. He wasn't a prof at UBC, was he?
I hope you realise that any such toilet exception would lead to the bulk of the G20 summit being conducted in the mens toilets. Leaving Germany, Brazil, Argentina and Australia to strike up a bizarre alliance in the women's toilet.
Expert in software patents or patent law? Contribute to the ESP wiki!
I actually did exactly that to an actor once at my community college, opps.
It's very easy to forget to mute a channel on an audio mixer when you often have dozens of them.
Fox news has made hardly any mention of it.
Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
Why does the president of the U.S. have to talk to the President of Israel literally EVERY DAY? We give them all that military aid and side on them with every issue. We cut out funding for the UN cultural agency just because they allow Palestine to join. And he STILL has to talk to their president every day?
Shouldn't he be more focused on the affairs of the US? I'm no isolationist, but why does he have to talk to the president of Israel every day? After a while, doesn't Israel have to become a viable nation that doesn't rely on the US for everything? I mean all they really have to do is stop building settlements so the international community will approve of them.
Democracy Now! - your daily, uncensored, corporate-free
What with all the complexities of statecraft, isn't it possible this was no accident? Perhaps it was meant as a bid to get Netanyahu's attention and subtly express French and US government positions on the Israel/Palestine question. Food for thought.
Angela Merkel is a woman?!
Nothing like a two-faced backstabbing politician. I am shocked, politicians not being straight forward and honest.
Of course, if we refer to Obama as a liar or two-faced or backstabbing, we'd be called a racist.
Fight Spammers!
The sad part is that Israel has the only rational leadership in the region, they also a flash point to Obama and Co. need to keep tabs on them and to try and keep nudging them one direction.
The problem is, Obama has never liked them and now its going to be real hard to play nice. Israel won't listen and it has been apparent early on that your only as good for the Administration as to your ability to listen and do what they think should be done. Its a classic textbook ignorance of reality, thinking that just because you say something it becomes something.
If anything it shows his true thinking which is wholly unprofessional to utter to another world leader. So much for being smart, I guess arrogance got in the way.
* Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
In the movie, he was on a panel of some press conference and after he spoke, he forgot to take off his wireless microphone and headed off the mensroom whereby the sounds of his visit were broadcast over the PA system.
The scene
It's safe for work.
And you've never seen (or heard) anyone on a mobile phone in the bathroom? I'm quite stunned every time I hear someone on their phone in there, like in airports or even at work.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Had that happen to me recently - the actor had gone to the toilet and I'd turned the volume on the monitor up in anticipation of doing a playback of the scene just shot, just in time to hear horrible whooshing noises that caused me no end of confusion (bad connection? interference?) - until I realised it was the sound of the toilet flushing. Fortunately, nothing else was heard. And nothing was said upon his return.
Before Israel it was always Christians vs. everyone else. There is almost no historical tension between Muslims and Jews. The tensions are all the result of Israel's actions, not some ancient Islamic prejudice against Jews.
Democracy Now! - your daily, uncensored, corporate-free
Oh you bunch of cry babies..."the one" said something off mic, and you libs get all bent out of shape saying not fair....I sure don't remember you crying your eyes out when Reagan's mic was on when he said "I've outlawed the USSR, the bombing begins in 10 minutes". You idiots cried that he's a war monger, his finger on the button bla bla bla...Get over it.
Why?
Oh this reason...
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
Elections are coming within a year for Obama, he needs to look like a descent person. Complaining about Netanyahu makes him look like he does not want to supply the weapons that are killing women and children in Palestine. But deep inside, he does not care
There are elected presidents of two countries and not two buddies in the pub. What they are talking and what they decide, will shape the future not only of their countries, but of the world. It would be "private" if Obama or Sarkozy would talk to his wife or his children, but not if one official is talking to another official.
Such talks should not be private in any sense. Actually, everything our leaders talk and do should be recorded for public review.
http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
Is it real news that Obama and the Frenchman don't like an Israeli? We haven't treated enemies as badly as Netanyahu was treated when he visited the White House.
Anyone else reminded of the episode of The West Wing where President Bartlet speaks candidly after an interview is supposedly over but the cameras are still rolling? In that fictional case his staff went apoplectic trying to put spin on how it was a mistake, etc., when in reality it was a calculated and savvy move where the President acted in full knowledge that the camera was still on.
Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
what is a simultaneous translation? do these guys have realtime voice to voice translation software?? that really works?
Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
I know a particular professor who did this teaching sophomore-level Java programming. Unfortunately, I was not at the lecture and heard about it later. All I'll say is that we're a big engineering school in a midwestern state.
So, leaders of the free world are actually human beings with personal opinions... ...And people thought those opinions were reflected in their policy. Kinda reinforces the idea that their policy is driven by the moral majority they belong to.
Not too many world leaders like Nitwityahoo but one must remember that Israel has the US by the nuts. It's their proxy war and financial machine which they have now almost wrecked beyond recognition.
Most liberals still thought Rather was an unbiased source even after the Memogate scandal.
At least I admit Fox is biased. At least of what I see of it, which is rarely, since it's never turned on in my house.
Honestly, I thought that was his mother the first time I saw them together.
Nigger-li Obama-ber caught sucking whitey dick.
Being in shape doesn't cure ugly.
If you wanted a hot first lady, we should have elected Fred Thompson.
There's a good list of real life occurrences of this on tvtropes. Just scroll down and look for the Real Life section.
WARNING!!! This is a link to tvtropes.org. While there, don't click on any links to any other sections of tvtropes. Tvtropes is a trap! I say again, it is a trap! Start following links there, and next thing you know it will be a week from now and you'll have a thousand tabs open and still be reading. You have been warned!
I have to give a kudos to the professionalism of the reporters (or most) who made the decision to not report it. Now I'd like to know "Arrets Sur Images, a French website that covers current affairs, got wind of the exchange".
The unempowered employees badmouthing their boss behind his back.
Sieg Heil!
Fight Spammers!
When he gained the presidency he got rid of the more pro-Arab foreign service hired by his predecessor. He bowed to all US desideratas he could get away with without angering the local populace too much. His early career in Neuilly was largely started through his good relations with the strong Lubavitch community there. He also happens to have Jewish ancestors.
In other words, yes, it's real news if you know the slightest thing about Sarkozy. Here's a hint, if you want to know things, Fox News is probably not the way to go.
Reminds me of Geo Bushwhacker II and his "Yo Blair!"
WARNING!!! This is a link to tvtropes.org. While there, don't click on any links to any other sections of tvtropes. Tvtropes is a trap! I say again, it is a trap! Start following links there, and next thing you know it will be a week from now and you'll have a thousand tabs open and still be reading. You have been warned
That just gave me a brilliant idea for a grease monkey script, it would disable all URLs on the page making it safe to visit.
Really? The standing ovation of Congress was bad treatment? The Congress applauds Netanyahu more than its own president.
While you're at it, you conveniently leave out Joe Biden's visit to Israel and what a slap in the face to the US that was!
You're either extremely ignorant, or extremely biased. The end result is the same.
The big question is, why is there a dislike of Netanyahu? Nothing happens without reason.
Had this happen during a 3-way phone call. They forgot they were still on the phone, had the phone in the pocket...
The web site that grew so large as to become self-aware, and then get an acting gig on NBC's community.
Israel news papers say that this happened while Pres Obama was giving Pres Sarkozy grief for voting against American & Israel's wishes.
But none of the American media seem to be noticing that.
Still trying to figure out how it is news that someone said a politician lies.
Let's be honest: all politicians lie. The question is who gets caught.
It started in the late 1800s, not 1917.
as it must be a cold day in hell that not only one, but two politicians actually spoke the truth.
Wilbur F. Storey tourne dans sa tombe...
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Simply they're all biased. It does help to remind those who think only Fox is biased. None of it is OK, it's just the way things are.
Well, there you go. I just showed where CBS coordinated a falsified attack story on Bush with the opposing Kerry campaign, directly attempting to influence a presidential election for the liberal candidate, and that's just "biased" to you. And that's what was labeled NEWS. It wasn't commentary or opinion.
One ABC news producer said about ABC, "The planning meetings have little political diversity. Everyone is left of center and at ease with their liberal ideals. The other viewpoint is rarely raised and never fully represented." I still find it funny that ABS's bio of their top (liberal, of course) journalist, Claire Shipman, fails to mention that her husband is Obama's press secretary. While Fox hires Dana Perino as a political commentator, Clinton insider George Stephanopoulos is portrayed by ABC as a straight journalist. This is just "biased" to you.
Yet Fox execs directing stories along their ideological lines is "REALLY REALLY BIASED". Political motivation on your part? Don't say!
If you're talking about the CBS fiasco you pretend didn't happen, I was never a Bush supporter. In fact, I agree with the general theme of the faked CBS story, that Bush did his best to get out of service during Vietnam using family connections. His supposed business career was equally deplorable.
It's not a technical glitch. There was no malfunction technically in the equipment.
Intersting how you miss the most relevant fact-that 15X the number of Palestinians have been killed by israel that vice versa. Israel is a nation formed, created and sustained on terrorist acts.
Anti-semitism is simply an excuse to invalidate criticsm of Israel, it is very good to see so many posters are finally seeing the true story of Israels many war crimes. To me it makes no difference if someone is killed by terrorists or an official army. Its clear Israel has killed 15X more Pals then vice cersa.
This is not a relevant fact. The relevant fact is that Palestinian terrorists are firing from densely populated areas so that the IDF will retaliate and kill as many civilians as possible, making the international community denounce Israel.
Israel has taken countless measures to prevent casualties among civilian population, dropping leaflets and sending text messages in order to warn citizens. What did Hamas do in that aspect?
Futhermore, the number of hospitals in the Gaza metropolitan can be counted on one hand, so people are not treated properly. It's not that the Palestinians don't have the cash to build new hospitals. (They are getting plenty from the US, EU and UN) They just rather spending it on ammo, explosives (and corruption) and not on medical care for their own people.
Why look to fiction when there are plenty of good real-life examples. You'd think they'd learn from history and manually turn off their mics.
Ah so killed Palestinians is NOT a revlevant fact eh? Shows exactly what your mindset is. If the human shields were so succesfull why do they keep using them? Israel's time in the ICC will come, and I hope to see many of the Israeli criminal convicted and jailed. As to hospitals, they seem to get a remarkable ammount od collateral damage when Israel attacks.
Ii was once a supporter of Israel but thier own actions ahve changed my mind, they are as bad of worse than the freedom fighters (I no longer fall for the false "terrorists label, especially as terrorism was central to the formation of Israel in the first place). What is good for the goose...
Ah, another one sided biased rant trying desperately to deflect crticism of Israel, a nation who are nothing more than thieves who used terrorism to achevie their aims. You can rant all you like but I do not have any problem with jews, and I never have, its Israel actions that is the issue and its muderous behaviour. I was a supporter for 20 years but as I said, it was Israel own muderous killing of CIVILLIANS at 15 to 1 rate, murder of rachel Corrie, US Liberty, and welll known use of collective punshment of families the brought my change of mind.
The world is no longer listening to your pathetic anti semitism wolf cry mate, or Israel's constant spin and lies. You can repeat the false accusation over and over but its worn thin for thinking people.
You can spin disemmble and lie all you like, but people are awake to the guilt trip now and soon
Israel will pay the price for its arrogance, theivery and dishonesty.
Its hillarious how you ignore the fact that the jews in the west bank are living on stolen land and far more Palestinians are in refugee camps. They should get all their land back that was stolen by Israeli terror in 1948, which was also the year jewish terroists murdered the UN representative for attempting to reverse the ethnic cleansing they were conducting. There are countless other examples of such Israeli terrorism, one only has to look. Doesnt one of those silly old books say something like "what you sow you reap" that is exactly the case for Israel.
Ironically they bleat when their own tactics are used against them. It was jewish terrorists who invented the idea of targetting medical responders, when the bodies of 2 british soldiers were hung in the street and bobby trapped to kill the paramedics.
As far as I am concerned these days Palestinians are freedom fighters, and their tactics kill far less civillians than Israels (which should be called occupied Palestine) do.
How about I come over and throw you out of your house and live in it whilst torturing and killing your family, and see how you react.
Pathetic people like you are just blind to anything that does not support your beloved Israel.
Ah, another one sided biased rant trying desperately to deflect crticism of Israel,
No, I asked you 3 times I believe for a workable solution. But you're too busy telling me I'm crying wolf and saying Israel is evil.
a nation who are nothing more than thieves who used terrorism to achevie their aims.
And here I was thinking they formed their own brigade and offered assistance to the British government in fighting the Ottoman Empire in return for land owned by the Brits. But then, I read history books.
You can rant all you like but I do not have any problem with jews, and I never have, its Israel actions that is the issue and its muderous behaviour.
You claim you have no problems with Jews. Your actions however speak differently. Stop talking like an anti-semite and start acting like somebody that actually wants to fix the situation. Criticizing only 1 side of a conflict that has problems on both sides, but refusing to try and fix the situation, is simply showing your bias by refusing to admit the atrocities on the other side.
US Liberty
Well here is a great example. Mistakes happen during wartime. Both the US and Israel researched the incident and found out it was an ACCIDENT due to misidentification. Yet anti-semites ignore that fact and call Israel evil for a mistake. Wouldn't it be a shame if some Arab Palestinians accidentally killed some innocent Jews? Wouldn't it be a shame if some Arab Palestinians purposefully promised to kill every innocent Jew? No I guess not. Damn Israel to hell!
The world is no longer listening to your pathetic anti semitism wolf cry mate
They haven't been listening for thousands of years, that is probably why the Jews keep getting shafted by people like you.
, or Israel's constant spin and lies. You can repeat the false accusation over and over but its worn thin for thinking people.
You can spin disemmble and lie all you like, but people are awake to the guilt trip now and soon
And which lie would you be talking about? Please be specific. Don't act like an anti-semite and paint me a liar without addressing specific "lies" the way you avoid discussing a workable solution to the situation so you can criticize Israel.
Israel will pay the price for its arrogance, theivery and dishonesty.
Oh there is that thievery thing again. Did Britain defeat the Ottoman's with Jewish and Arab help? Were they granted "ownership" of the area as restitution for the Ottoman's attempt to conquer the world? Did they agree to split it into 3 countries: 2 Arab, 1 Jewish, as a thank you to the helpers? At which point did they "steal" the land?
Its hillarious how you ignore the fact that the jews in the west bank are living on stolen land and far more Palestinians are in refugee camps.
When did I ignore it? Never. You probably think I'm some dumb Jew ignoring facts and blindly defending Israel. The only thing I've ever stated is my desire that people only use facts in their arguments and not be so bigoted towards opposing interpretations of the facts. The only ignoring being done here is you of the NATIVE JEWISH PALESTINIANS. They've been living on stolen land for 2000 years? Oh yea, kick them out.
They should get all their land back that was stolen by Israeli terror in 1948, which was also the year jewish terroists murdered the UN representative for attempting to reverse the ethnic cleansing they were conducting.
Wow, that is creative. They "earned" the land between 1915 and 1917 by fighting and dieing for the British against the Ottomans. The terrorist acts you're speaking of started much sooner than 1948 AGAINST the Jews by the Arabs. The Haganah was formed because the Brits were not protecting the isolated Jewish settlements. Sh