Slashdot Mirror


Huge Tesla Coils Will Recreate Natural Lightning

jjp9999 writes "In order to study the nature of lighting, the team at Lightning on Demand (LOD) plans to build two, ten-story-tall Tesla coils—the largest ever—that will blast arcs of lightning hundreds of feet in length. LOD founder Greg Leyh said the project aims to reveal details on the initiation process of natural lightning, an area that remains a mystery, since smaller generated arcs have more trouble breaking through the air. It is believed that 'laboratory-scale electric arcs start to gain lightning-like abilities once they grow past about 200ft in length,' according to the LOD website, and so the team hopes to build Tesla coils large enough to do this. According to Leyh, 'Understanding how lightning forms [and grows] is the first step towards being able to control where lightning strikes or being able to suppress it completely in certain areas.'"

199 comments

  1. Exciting! by Aerynvala · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for the SyFy movie based on the 'true story' :)

    --
    http://transformativeworks.org/
    1. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ironically yesterday there was a SyFy movie about the topic of a madman controlling the weather from his iPhone.

      There's a zap for that.

    2. Re:Exciting! by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      has any one told Helen Magnus what Teslas up to now ;-)

    3. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not ironic.

    4. Re:Exciting! by Doctor+Morbius · · Score: 1

      That's not irony. That's just a coincidence.

      --
      If I disagree with you it's because you are wrong.
    5. Re:Exciting! by HateBreeder · · Score: 3, Funny

      I will never forgive the SyFy channel for perverting the spelling of "Sci-Fi".
      Not to mention killing off Stargate... or any decent show for that matter. We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.
      Maybe they've done some surveys and decided that their target audience should actually be a bunch of retards.

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    6. Re:Exciting! by mark_reh · · Score: 0

      I actually saw a post from someone on the Gizmodo site claiming that it was dangerous to use a cell phone during a storm because "it might attract lightening (sic)". When probed to explain further he said that the electromagnetic field between the phone and antenna tower would provide a path for the lightening (sic).

      It was such an interesting idea (I don't know where he got it from) I thought it would make a good story about a geek figuring out a way to murder someone by calling their cell phone during a storm so that lightning traveled along the EM field between the cell tower and the phone, killing the called person. The caller would be somewhere safe- like in another state where there was no storm- when he called, of course.

    7. Re:Exciting! by Macrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.

      Eureka has been canceled.

      You are stuck with rubbish like Ghost Hunters.

    8. Re:Exciting! by syousef · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the SyFy movie based on the 'true story' :)

      Here you go:

      http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-lightning-strikes-twice.html

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    9. Re:Exciting! by germansausage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At the risk of sounding like a dick, I have to say that's not even wrong. Lightning and em fields don't work that way.

    10. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Informative

      the electromagnetic field between the phone and antenna tower would provide a path for the lightening

      To make the lightning actually hit the poor sod on the phone, you would need to ensure that the bridge generated by the field between the phone and tower was the path of leaast resistance for the lightning to follow. While it may create a path of (microscopically lower than the air) lower resistance, it would still need to become the optimal path - which is where it would fall down.

      You would have more luck trying to get the guy to play golf swinging metal sticks around, or better yet stand on top of a sand dune in the desert during a storm. In fact it would be much easier to try to rig the house of the person and call their landline (as long as it isn't a wireless phone, but one of the old fashioned curly cord types) and get the lightning to to id that way. There are many more documented cases where lightning has travelled along phone cables. This is because the resistance differential offered by a metal cable is in the order of many many magnitudes higher then the resistance differential offered by an EM field.

      It's like trying to divert a huge river with two options, one is a path in the sand drawn with your finger (That's the EM field) and the other option to divert is with a Panama sized canal (that's the metal phone cable). The lightning will try to pick the path of least resistance from the clouds to the ground, but the likelihood that the path just happens to be the EM field caused by the phone signal is so miniscule that it is almost not plausible. A wet tree, a telegraph pole, an overhead wire, a nearby hill or even a lightning rod would almost always provide a path of lower resistance.

      Not saying it isn't theoretically possible, but to be able to "set it up" to happen just at the right moment when a call is made to "kill" the person isn't realistically plausible.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    11. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And WWE Raw (or whatever the 'proper' name is.)

    12. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the SyFy movie based on the 'true story' :)

      There was one SyFy (I still choke when I type that) where they had to use a giant Tesla-coil-like thing at some Arctic research base to realign the Earth's magnetic field or some such nonsense. It was on TV one evening: the movie was so bad I had to turn it off.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    13. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not irony. That's just a coincidence.

      It's not much of a coincidence; nothing coincided. Technically it's an example of 'something slightly relevant to this conversation'.

    14. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At the risk of sounding like a dick, I have to say that's not even wrong. Lightning and em fields don't work that way.

      Well, since we're discussing SyFy Channel movies, I have to say that not a single one of them has ever been based on anything resembling science, science-fiction or reality. Really, you'd think they could at least consult a local college physics instructor before throwing this crap out there. Of course, the only difference between a SyFy Channel flick and a Roland Emmerich production is that he a. gets bigger name actors and b. spends more on special effects that ten year's worth of SyFy's movie budgets.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not saying it isn't theoretically possible, but to be able to "set it up" to happen just at the right moment when a call is made to "kill" the person isn't realistically plausible.

      Well, if you had a high-powered microwave beam capable of ionizing the air above the person you are trying to assassinate you might have better luck. Of course, from a practical standpoint you might as well just cook him with the thing and forget the lightning.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    16. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 2

      Of course, from a practical standpoint you might as well just cook him with the thing and forget the lightning.

      Yup, it could in theory be done, but by the time you address all the things that you would need to, there would be a multitude of other ways to achieve the same purpose that were more reliable, easier and more believable to a reader of a science fiction story.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    17. Re:Exciting! by meerling · · Score: 1

      Haven't most of the SyFy(lis) channels movies been cheap monster movies, with but a single monster each?

      Not all, just most.

    18. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I will never forgive the SyFy channel for perverting the spelling of "Sci-Fi".

      Bonnie Hammer's successor stated that it was because they couldn't get copyright on "Sci-fi".

      Not to mention killing off Stargate... or any decent show for that matter. We're now stuck with rubbish like Eureka.

      They've had a history of that. Take Sliders for example. They tried very hard to kill it off because "it wasn't getting the numbers we wanted." Cast changes, writer changes ... but it was still popular. Ms. Hammer, in her infinite wisdom, ultimately decided that Sci-Fi couldn't afford to keep it in production because they'd committed to a season of "Next Wave", in her words "a guaranteed hit." Turned out to be a guaranteed flop, but by then Sliders was history.

      Maybe they've done some surveys and decided that their target audience should actually be a bunch of retards.

      Yes, considering that they've put on psychics, wrestling, and a number of other drain-bamaged shows in an effort to broaden their viewer base. Hey, dimbulbs ... what color is the sky in your world? John Edwards is not science fiction! There are plenty of other cable channels that cover that crap: I tuned in to their channel because they were offering something special. In the end, what they achieved was the alienation of the viewers who watched their programming because it was the SCIENCE-fiction channel!

      The only retards here are the drain-bamaged fools run that operation. The Sci-Fi Channel, back in its heyday with the likes of Sliders, Stargate and other great shows was about the only reason I bothered to have cable TV. Certainly wasn't for the lame selection of movies that most cable companies offer. Now they spend millions making some of the most incredibly bad movies (and I mean bad ... not "so bad they're good", they're just stupid) rather than pumping that capital into some more quality TV series.

      It's even more depressing when I see all the ex-Stargate actors and actresses showing up in SyFy's movies.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    19. Re:Exciting! by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      But lightning would be a very unlikely murder weapon, thus the appeal.

    20. Re:Exciting! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Haven't most of the SyFy(lis) channels movies been cheap monster movies, with but a single monster each? Not all, just most.

      Yeah, pretty much. There was the one flick that had none other than Stargate's Samantha Carter in it, where some kind of new power plant generated an artificial black hole that (of course) threatened the entire planet. There was another where a cache of pterodactyl eggs hatched and a whole bunch of the things were flying around eating people. And of course, one of the single-monster jobs you mentioned, starring Corin Nemec.

      I can't believe I've actually watched those movies. I don't anymore. Besides, since the SyFy (gack!) Channel kinda lost focus and started going after viewers that haven't got a clue what science-fiction actually is I don't even have them in my lineup.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    21. Re:Exciting! by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      Try telling the guy over at Gizmodo! No one could even get him to spell lightning correctly...

    22. Re:Exciting! by Aerynvala · · Score: 1

      I hate writing SyFy for the channel as well. And that's unfortunate re the movie. I can enjoy a certain type of bad movie, when they have fun with it and are at least interesting.

      --
      http://transformativeworks.org/
    23. Re:Exciting! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Shine a UV laser beam from near the top of a high building (with the lightning rods disconnected from the ground) to the guy with the phone. That could ionize a conductive path to the victim, which the lightning could follow on its way through the victim to the ground. Use the cell phone signal as the trigger to greatly increase the beam strength (to give the friggin' cell phone a role in this Rube Goldberg scheme). Also maybe shine another one straight up into the storm.

      Complicated? Of course not. Simple as pie. :D All in a day's work. Why, I have a portable 100 watt UV laser right here in my back pocket!

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    24. Re:Exciting! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 5, Funny

      So your plan is to turn yourself into the antenna that will send the lightning to your target. What could possibly go wrong?

    25. Re:Exciting! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      I always wanted my hair permed! :D But of course all that hardware would be remotely controlled, along with the cloud seeding blimp to encourage the lightning to start at the right time.

      Hmm. I wonder if we could get the victim to stand on a platform that just happens to be charged up to make it a better target.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    26. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      If you really want to get away with it, make it the most obvious weapon. If someone is killed by anthrax, they can get a sample and depending on the exact genetics, they can trace it back to the lab it came from. If the protagonist in the novel needs to kill someone on the hush, have the guy hit by a car then burn the car or throw it into a chop shop. Or steal the car. Things that are "unlikely" tend to be only able to be performed by a select few - meaning that the pool of possible suspects is already a really small pool. Getting away from the fuzz at that point is oh so much harder. Even setting it up to look like something else - get the guy in the novel drunk, drug him with something easily masked by alcohol, strip him and leave him in freezing mountains - maybe full of bears and wolves and other things that eat tasty human sized morsels.

      Okay, so running someone over isn't going to be as cool or have the same "Whoa..." impact in a science fiction novel as setting up lightning to strike the fellow when he happens to answer a call - but it would be much more likely that the person got away without so much as being interviewed by police.

      Lastly, being struck by ligthning doesn't always kill - check out Roy Sullivan - the Human Lightning Rod who has now survived seven (no shit!) lightning strikes. Also, about one in ten thousand people will be struck by lightning over a lifespan of eighty years. Of course, being outdoors a lot and in an area prone to lightning storms drastically raises those odds.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    27. Re:Exciting! by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      there needs to be a +1 uuuggggghhhh.

      --
      Balderdash!
    28. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      there needs to be a +1 uuuggggghhhh.

      You can get a 100% refund of the cover charge at the door.

    29. Re:Exciting! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I can guess the plot....scientists trying to control nature create a lightning monster which terrorizes a small town (that just so happens to look like Toronto) until a D list actor comes along and saves the day? Oh and there MUST be at least one instance of the cop saying "I'm getting too old for this shit" as I think that's a law now.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    30. Re:Exciting! by Fluffeh · · Score: 2

      along with the cloud seeding blimp to encourage the lightning to start at the right time

      Actually, cloud seeding is likely to supress lightning rather than create it mainly by supressing hail that can cause intracloud lightning.

      There are currently three known ways to trigger lightning which might be plausible.
      1) Launch a rocket - Some rockets unspool wire as they launch which acts as a lovely lightning rod back to the ground - however somewhat obvious if this is supposed to be a clean as a whistle murder though.
      2) Have a volcano erupt - Volcanos often form lightning storms near their volcanic plume. This stunning picture was captured in 1994 at the Rinjani eruption.
      3) Have a super powered laser creating the ionized beam into the clouds - however even the military who have been trying this since the 1970's have only managed to notice a slight increase small local discharges within the cloud itself, rather than a cloud to ground strike.

      Whatever way you look at it, it's a really really long shot.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    31. Re:Exciting! by Meski · · Score: 1

      Lightening: the effect you get at dawn. Or when turning a light switch on. Opposite of darkening. :)

    32. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, am I the ONLY ONE who noticed that the summary says "lighting" rather than "lightning"?

      o.0

      ^^^

    33. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science issues aside, that would be the most ridiculously stupid way of trying to kill someone I've ever heard of.

    34. Re:Exciting! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      ... wait, wouldn't a laser that powerful be capable of killing someone outright?

      (*whoooosh*, I suppose. :P )

    35. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and 'professional' wrestling.

    36. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably figured sci-fi vs SyFy:

      a. branding
      b. trademark

      Years ago when my then cable TV provider (I dumped cable 4 years ago. In 6 years the base level price had more than tripled, but the number of shows I like was dwindling. A lot of the better content was being bumped to a higher tier service, meaning to get what I getting for $35 would cost $150 or more) finally got the original Outer Limits, I was very happy for about a 1/2 hour. Then I realized they were cutting about 8-12 minutes out of each show to squeeze in more commercials. Maybe the shows owners only allowed them to show truncated versions, hoping the hardcore fans would buy the full length CD versions.

      end of rant. I'm not a coward, just too lazy to register.

    37. Re:Exciting! by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought "Sharktapus" was a documentary!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    38. Re:Exciting! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I watch them for their B-movie/Ed Wood flair. Since I can't stand what is considered comedy now a days, I find SyFy (that name gets worse every time I type it) movies fill that comedy gap. Especially if I can get my wife to watch one with me so we can mock the "science." Her favorites are the various shark movies, as she is a big shark fan (as in real sharks, not movies). She did almost beat me when I lured her in about another "shark movie," while neglecting to tell her the name was "Sharktapus." Heh, it was worth it.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    39. Re:Exciting! by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I think the whole downfall started with Bonnie. Wasn't she the one that kicked Bab5 off to TNT (or somebody?)?
      There was also another really bizarre reason given back then why they were changing the name. Something about bringing in non-geeks while trying to keep the geeks and blah blah... The mental backflips they were doing on that one was amazing.
      Once SyFy put wrestling on, I gave up. I watch Eureka, but only because I find it funny. The science may be bad, but I prefer a bad science joke than the usual sitcom jokes about people getting into "wacky situations."
      For the ex-show actors, ever notice how they have maybe 10 minutes of screen time? 3 days work for a paycheck isn't a bad deal.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    40. Re:Exciting! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the lightning monster was from the artificial black hole movie. Yes, I do enjoy watching these crappy movies. :D

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    41. Re:Exciting! by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Of course, from a practical standpoint you might as well just cook him with the thing and forget the lightning.

      Yup, it could in theory be done, but by the time you address all the things that you would need to, there would be a multitude of other ways to achieve the same purpose that were more reliable, easier and more believable to a reader of a science fiction story.

      Anybody hear about that new invention, the "gun"?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    42. Re:Exciting! by Phoghat · · Score: 2
      James Bond:" You expect me to tell you my secrets ?"

      Goldfinger: "No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".

      And, as usual, he doesn't. Just shoot him already.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    43. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fairness, there's still Warehouse 13 -- it's not really SF, but neither was Eureka, and it's a lot better than Ghost Punters.

    44. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And (replying to myself) I forgot Alphas, which is a good humans-with-superpowers show -- think x-men, but low-key, low-budget and really well done. My circle of nerds were mostly (self included) watching it with the aim to mock it, like The Cape, but it surprised us all by being, not only good-for-syfylis, but actually good.

    45. Re:Exciting! by ambrandt · · Score: 1

      Now, if Sci-Fi/SyFy could only come up with an original idea for a show instead of ripping off other shows... Warehouse 13 is just a slightly modified version of Fringe, and from the miniscule seconds that I watch of SyFy as I channel surf right past it, it seems pretty much everything on it is a horrible rip-off of some other show.

    46. Re:Exciting! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Yep, just like that gun the evil villain is holding while his henchman ties Batman to the conveyor belt that takes 15 minutes to carry him up to the huge saw blade. :D Hmm. Maybe we should put the laser on a platform on the top of the building. Oh, I know - it will be New Year's, and it's secretly been installed inside the Times Square ball, so when it gets to the bottom the laser triggers and aims perfectly for the guy with the cell phone. Of course, the evil villain has a secret system for making a thunderstorm hover over the exact spot, building up an electrical charge. In fact, he advertises this as a rain-suppression system to protect the crowds from rain. But it will really zap the cell-phone guy, then (as we find out in a sub-plot where the good-guy nerd at National Weather Service figures it out and tells his girl friend) dump a huge deluge, causing flooding in downtown Manhattan just as the New Year's celebration begins!

      Now THAT's a plot! MUahahahaha!!! :D

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    47. Re:Exciting! by heinousjay · · Score: 0

      That's the irony, generally speaking people just post any old blather.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    48. Re:Exciting! by SpacerOne · · Score: 1

      Using the One Terminal Capacitor ( that is the thing that is the sphere of a Flying Saucer), I got a lightning strike out of clear blue sky. It scared the daylights out of me and some rough looking farm dogs that had just arrived to give me the once -over
      It set the tree under wich I was parked on fire .
      The dogs were instantly changed into the fastest whippets on their way back to the farm, .
      Look at> One Terminal Capacitor. Be extemely careful when experimenting. With my very first experiment I generated over one half million volts and almost broke my arm. Do no use more than one tube (UV Tube) , After firing it up do not charge the "capacitor" with more than 500 volts higher than the firing voltage.. Use a Faraday Cage ( your all-metal back-yard shed). remove your watch and cell-phone..
      Anything transistorized can be zapped (TV, Radio,
      Cell-phone, Computer)..
      Nasa "experts", who were given the circuit to be used for propulsion of the Shuttles, went too high an caused the big black-out of 2003 in the USA and Canada.

    49. Re:Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > John Edwards is not science fiction!

      Well, it's still half right. And I don't mean the science half.

      Maybe they should just rename the channel "Fy"? Then again, people might think that was an acronym...

    50. Re:Exciting! by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Not sure if that comparison is fair or not, but Warehouse 13 is more enjoyable than Fringe. If it wasn't for John Noble, there'd be no one worth watching on that waste of electrons. (That said, Eddie McClintock's character is annoying as hell) And not to knock a hot Aussie actress because I sure love the lot of them but Anna Torv needs to go back to drama school. Let's get Yvonne Strahovski to take over the lead role although Chuck just wouldn't be the same without her.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  2. Blasfemy by gsiliceo · · Score: 1

    No man will ever control lightningt, ever! Thats the privilege of a god.

    1. Re:Blasfemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, I spoke to the invisible pink unicorn (blessed be her holy hooves) and she is fine with it.

      The One true One. Her Horniness. She whose hooves many never be shod. Her Pinkness.

    2. Re:Blasfemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Princess Celestia is white. Be thou not fooled by cheap toys!

    3. Re:Blasfemy by The+Askylist · · Score: 2

      You're just thor. Thtupid thod.

    4. Re:Blasfemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Princess Celestia is white. Be thou not fooled by cheap toys!

      Is it wrong that I heard that in Luna's voice?

      Back on topic, here's Princess Celestia, and a whoppingly-huge electrical discharge: I really like her mane

    5. Re:Blasfemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is also Zeus.

    6. Re:Blasfemy by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Princess Celestia is plastic. Be thou not fooled! But hey, whatever smokes your shorts.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  3. Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by CronoCloud · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by mkraft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Welcome to Slashdot. You must be new here.

    2. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up

    3. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by Annirak · · Score: 1

      Well, newer than me, anyway.

    4. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by neonsignal · · Score: 1

      You must be old here.

    5. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by hackerm · · Score: 1

      And me.

    6. Re:Wasn't this mentioned a week ago? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I'm quite sure your comment is a dupe, too. I think I've seen the same before. Well actually it's more than just a dupe. A dupe of a dupe of a dupe of a... well you get the idea.

  4. Just like a video game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something out of c&c red alert

    1. Re:Just like a video game! by Teeroy32 · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly what I was thinking, and the fact they kept mentioning LOD, just change the L to a N, the brotherhood of NOD are are about to attack and these Tesla Coils are the perfect defense. Just need a fleet of mammoth tanks with 2 turrets and a set of rocket launchers each, a commando and a few battleships and we'll be fine

      --
      I don't have an attitude problem, Its you that has a problem with my attitude
  5. Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We all know what happened the last time one of Tesla's experiments got away from him.

    1. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tesla's bad assery far exceeds the Tunguska myth. He figured out how to turn our great big ball of iron surrounded by an electrostatic atmosphere into a giant fucking power source. He knew burning fossil fuels was a bad idea 100 years ago before anyone ever conceived it would be an issue.

      If we use fuel to get our power, we are living on our capital and exhausting it rapidly. This method is barbarous and wantonly wasteful and will have to be stopped in the interest of coming generations.

      He was trying to hand us a solution to problems we didn't even have yet and give us technology not unlike the telecommunications we have today 100 years ago! He even told us how to fucking do it when he filed a patent on the process.

      But hey, maybe these guys are on to his work and just needed a cover story to get funding for their own Wardenclyffe tower. One can only hope...

    2. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by datavirtue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a book that is comprised of transcripts from lawsuits that Tesla was involved in where he used the court proceedings to document some of his tech. He was dealing with some very powerful industrialists, people who basically owned the world as everyone knew it. I have seen documentaries where it is demonstrated that Edison was worshiped by Presidents and important people the world over where Tesla isn't even mentioned--even in passing. When I first learned of Tesla I realized that I never questioned a lot of the things I take for granted and it wasn't well known who invented or developed them, now I know.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    3. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tesla was the man. He pioneered everything from physics to telecommunications. Though never realized, he actually figured out how to extract static electricity from the air and turn it into a power source. Talk about renewable energy.... Then there is the tesla turbine? You tube it. Its the sickest little mechanical device and so freaking simple its ridiculous.

        I read the other day that scientists every now and again come across a new invention only to find out tesla patented the same thing 100 years prior.

    4. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      That's a nice thought, except he didn't have a way to turn our great big ball of iron into an unlimited free power source. Just the thought is ridiculous. Tesla was obviously a genius, but he made claims for ideas of his that were never realized or were frankly impossible, or claims of amazing discoveries that he then never published. If he did have a method to develop free energy 100 years ago, not publicly divulging the information would have been strange given his financial difficulties as well as just of course he would have.

      Every single person one hundred years ago could tell you that an unlimited free source of energy would have been better than oil. It isn't even really a choice, it's not a matter of Tesla having amazing foresight or being ahead of his time or what have you.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    5. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you mean Tunguska, Wardenclyffe Tower was inactive at the time and the theory doesn't account for the meteroid fragments found at the site.

    6. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a nice thought, except he didn't have a way to turn our great big ball of iron into an unlimited free power source. Just the thought is ridiculous.

      Lightning? How does it work? Huuuurrrr.

      Tesla was obviously a genius, but he made claims for ideas of his that were never realized or were frankly impossible, or claims of amazing discoveries that he then never published. If he did have a method to develop free energy 100 years ago, not publicly divulging the information would have been strange given his financial difficulties as well as just of course he would have.

      Yeah, he would've done something like... file a patent :-|

      Every single person one hundred years ago could tell you that an unlimited free source of energy would have been better than oil. It isn't even really a choice, it's not a matter of Tesla having amazing foresight or being ahead of his time or what have you.

      Yeah, but only one of them demonstrated how to do it and light bulbs with wireless power 26 miles away from the source.

    7. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might not be that far off I would think you could get a little if you tuned a crystal radio to the frequency of whatever em interference the earths magnetic field puts off, not enough to be useful for any practical purpose, but measurable. Of course you'd have to ground it to something that's null to the earths em field dunno what that would be. Maybe tesla thought upper atmosphere or something he did like playing with atmosphere wouldn't work, but he didn't have the data to know it wouldn't.

    8. Re:Should Siberia evacuate? by ambrandt · · Score: 1

      I have chemical pumps at work that use Tesla Turbines... and magnetic driveshafts (magnet surrounded by another magnet). Pacemaker users beware (they even have warning stickers)! They're even vernier adjustable down to 1 gram depending on the viscosity and temperature of the chemical.

  6. Sell tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed at their ability to get funding for this. I think it is going to have more value in it's novelist than it's scientific merit. Maybe they will sell tickets to see the show.

    1. Re:Sell tickets by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

      You may wish to finish reading the linked article, they're still working on the funding. But if they get it, there will be tickets. http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/648673855/the-lightning-foundry

  7. I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "LOD founder Greg Leyh said the project aims to reveal details on the initiation process of natural lightning"

    I guess geeks have to learn to initiate on something.

  8. Best job EVAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The has got to be the best job ever..."Built ten-story Tesla coils to re-create natural lightning arc over 200 feet in length"

  9. Most important question by Halo1 · · Score: 2

    Will they also play music on them?

    --
    Donate free food here
    1. Re:Most important question by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      This one is even more nutsy- no poles, just the suit. It really has to be disconcerting when the lightning is hitting his head.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    2. Re:Most important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking something more along the lines of this, but whatever cultural touchstone does it for you, I guess?

  10. Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by kurthr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Greg is a great guy, giant tesla coils are cool, and I'd love to know more about lightning, but it seems like lots of properties of air (especially when it has water or other polarizable droplets/particles) are frequency dependent. So I'm not sure how that this is really going to act like the natural lightning that we're used to... Science? Ok, but not Natural Lightning Science.

    1. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by hort_wort · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's a good point. Further, AC transmits electricity. I have a tiny tesla coil in my room that can light up a flourescent bulb from some distance. I'm betting he's gonna blow out all his own equipment the first time he turns it on. I'll give him bonus points if he can spread that EMP burst out enough to fry electronics in nearby homes.

    2. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm betting he's gonna blow out all his own equipment the first time he turns it on.

      FTFA:

      Tesla coils have an uncanny ability to short out modern electronics—anything from erasing voice mails to blowing out computer screens. To guard against this, the LOD teams usually places “nearby electronics in shielded enclosures,” or they run the coils “far, far away,” Leyh said.

      I know. I must be new here, I read TFA. After a while here, you don't read TFA. Later on still, you don't even read TFS.

      On the absolute existential plain of eternal bliss, you don't even read the title, either. You just post.

      However, I agree with your comment . . . which is why I want to be there when he fires that critter up, and all the ensuing pandemonium rages. Maybe it'll create a Black Hole, and the Higgs Boson will pop out of it. CERN really let us all down there, with the end of the universe, and an angry God appearing looking for His Particle.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Once one reaches /. zen they no longer need to even read TFC either.

      It's fairly boring though as I can only stand to read fifty or so RE:s of the same subject.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      You were already modded max, so I'm just going to agree - AC and DC do very different streamer formation, due to the displacement current drawn by dielectrics with AC (delta V/t). This has nothing to do with lightning, but it WILL be cool. I work with high voltage all the time, I know this stuff. See my forums in my sig.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    5. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You don't need to read the subjects either. Just locate the nearest comment modded to +5 and post your own as a reply to that. If you say something about 1984, it's practically always considered on-topic hereabouts.

    6. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hi Kurt,

      Since we're attempting to trigger a relativistic runaway breakdown, all that matters is that the formation time is short compared to one period of AC.

      The predicted formation time for a relativistic avalanche is 10's of microseconds, and the 10-story coilforms resonate at a very low frequency (about 5200Hz) so for all practical purposes the slow-moving coil output will appear as high voltage DC during the avalanche.

      -Greg Leyh

    7. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Looks like the DC ate your sig!

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    8. Re:Lightning is a DC not an AC Electric arc? by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

      I'm not completely convinced of this, because the state of the atoms in the surrounding space will be strongly perturbed by the time-varying induced voltages, not just the static coulomb voltage. I would be very surprised if the "lightning" coming off of tesla coils is structured like real lightning precisely at the avalanche for this reason. The initiation of dielectric breakdown in a gradually building radial static field seems as though it would be very different from dielectric breakdown through atoms that have more or less been kicked in the ass sideways by an EMP. Tesla coils RADIATE a large amount of transverse energy throughout their time-dependent cycle, and this energy clearly alters the velocity distribution of nearby atoms to nonthermal "instantly" (nonthermal in the specific sense that they aren't even locally describable by a "temperature") and if they were (averaging) they would be "hot", preheated by eddy currents BEFORE the peak voltage and discharge occur. DC charged clouds OTOH one would expect would heat the surrounding air BY the incipient dielectric discharge, quite possibly over a timescale of seconds as the voltages gradually build and increase the electrostatic wind (nearby air atoms that pick up charge and are strongly repelled, banging through neutral atoms being weakly attracted the other way by straight-up induced dipole forces). In this case one would expect at least sufficient time for local equilibrium to be achieved, enough so that one could speak of the nucleation and growth of the distribution of higher temperatures in the surrounding air, maybe?

      So, I'm curious -- given that you are going to be spending big science money on two 200 foot tesla coils (why two? Why not one and a large conducting sheet so that it sees its own mirror if it is really "DC" enough to ignore eddy currents?) why not build a single giant vandegraff, one with a primary ball made out of e.g. a 10+ meter radius mylar balloon floated over a very large conducting floor so that it sees its own image charge instead of a second, equally expensive primary? Rule of thumb 30kV * R(cm) = V_discharge suggests that a 10 meter radius sphere should arc at 30 MV in air, and it should also have a very large capacitance (so that the energy in an arc discharge should be quite large). An inflated mylar sphere should be cheap enough to be a consumable item, if it comes to that, and the lightning produced by such a device would be very close to REAL lightning in its form and structure because the mylar sphere is actually a model for a real cloud. Indeed, one could use blimp-shaped or irregularly shaped objects to further model the irregular shapes of clouds that increase the capacitance while decreasing the peak breakdown voltage.

      Not that I don't appreciate the desire to create really big sparks, mind you, and tesla coils do make much more impressive ongoing displays... I would just argue that it is reasonable to doubt that the answers you get from a tesla coil would necessarily apply to real lightning where the answers one would get from a supersized vandegraff -- even though they are still on a smaller scale than real clouds -- are much more likely to be scalable and to exhibit the right features at all scales. And if you buy a used goodyear blimp and cover it with e.g. aluminum vapor and use it as the primary tethered to the top of a 100 meter tower, you would be pretty close to the actual scale of a cloud...

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  11. Atmosphere by dan_barrett · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully they're building this over a smallish castle + mad scientist lab with convenient skylights, along with the worlds largest knife switch

    1. Re:Atmosphere by mjwalshe · · Score: 4, Funny

      and an Igor - They know the secret of storing lightning in jars

    2. Re:Atmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

    3. Re:Atmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yesss, master. It's a Leyden jar.

    4. Re:Atmosphere by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I'll start prepping the pitchforks and torches, for that *authentic* look.

      They might need to work on their mad laughter skills though, there's a real knack to it.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  12. Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

    This can't be anywhere near civilization, as a Tesla coil can fry any electronics. It also can't be in some forest wilderness, as a Tesla coil can easily ignite trees. As they say, they're making something that's more and more lightning like, which is also more unsafe. So building a 10' Tesla coil is probably not the hard problem.... the hard problem is operating it Safely, and actually being able to take experimental observations.... because, this is all very dangerous.

    And also, will the FCC allow them to operate it, once they've built it?

    Considering spark gap transmitters have long been banned due to the spectrum-wide interference they cause; and the earliest such radio transmitters were tesla coils... and EMI in particular can be generated across the spectrum as well, resulting in disruptions to communications, with such a large tesla coil, and such a large arc, especially if they are attempting to use frequencies associated with wireless transmissions; I wonder what will the RFI fallout will be.

    ; and any horizontally long metallic structure can get induced currents and also become antennae for further RFI emissions. Yes, lightning does show up on the radio spectrum as well, but a powered up Tesla coil emits many arcs not spread out by time, a much bigger footprint than lightning....

    1. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as nobody will sue them if he infringes on some imaginary property, they won't give a shit.

    2. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by ustolemyname · · Score: 4, Informative

      So building a 10' Tesla coil is probably not the hard problem

      It's not 10'. It's 10 stories, so more like 100' Tesla coils. I would call that hard.

    3. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no point in them making continuous discharges, if what they plan to study is lightning. its pretty easy to make your telsa coil fire one arc whenever you want it, and there is no danger of it hitting anything but the other tesla coil. im assuming the plan would be to make one coil positive and one negatively charged, which would mean the arcs would definitely want to hit the other tower, not the ground or a tree (assuming they would be stupid enough to put it in a forest, ever heard of a cornfield?) EMI created from large arcs falls off with the square of the radius, like lots of things. theres plenty of places large enough for an experiment like this, and as far as radio interference goes, single bursts arent going to make any planes fall out of the sky any faster than a lightning bolt, seeing as they hope to make them practically identical. as far as the FCC is concerned, as long as your personal computer isnt right next to it, they dont have to put their stamp on it saying that its not going to screw it up.

    4. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Rinnon · · Score: 2

      Oh come on, we all know where the best place for these kind of mad science projects are. The Antarctic! Worst thing you could do is melt a little ice, and I think we've already got a plan in motion for that one.

    5. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Megahard · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing it would have to be enclosed, like PG&E's facility in San Ramon, seen on Mythbusters. I work less than a mile away and there's no interference.

      BTW to me it looks like a giant breast.

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    6. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I say put them on top of Congress. It'll screw up their cell phones and maybe they'd get some work done. Also all their hair standing on end would make Cspan more amusing.

    7. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Pirate_Pettit · · Score: 2

      Maybe I'm just not on the right wavelength, but what sort of danger are we talking about here? I mean, yes, on a personal level, intentionally creating something close to actual lighting is going to be potentially dangerous to those in immediate proximity, but this is no nuke. Early rocketry exposed its researchers to explosive risks, but it didn't take long to anticipate and accommodate those risks, such that most of the time, the only casualty was a chunk of ground and a little pride.

      Build your lighting tower, charge 'er up, and go really far away. sensor packages and telephoto lenses, and who could really get hurt? There's plenty of desert in this country, where localized RF disruption hurts no one, and the ground is so unchanging its practically a constant. We've tested all sorts of explosives in the middle of nowhere for far less noble purposes. I think understanding lightning as a natural phenomenon is a reasonable goal with acceptable, highly localized - and mostly predictable risks. Bring on the lighting machines.

    8. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So maybe in Detroit then?

    9. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That's gonna be one huge enclosure then.

      The coils themselves 10 stories tall, the towers 260' apart - that's quite big. But the enclosure will have to be far enough from the coils to not attract the sparks: you want the sparks between the towers, not between a tower and the enclosure. So that should be easily a 20 stories tall enclosure.

      And to make matters worse, no supports are possible, as naturally a support would become too close to the coils. Really wonder how they would go about that. The biggest unsupported roofs that I have heard of are stadiums, and this would have to be roughly twice that size.

      I'd more likely expect this to be built far far away from civilisation in the middle of a desert or so. And when operating close air space as well so passing planes don't get hit by the EMP.

    10. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the radiated output from the coils will be quite low, owing to several factors:

      A) The operating frequency is *very* low, only 5200 Hz. This is actually *below* the frequency range the FCC controls.

      B) The wavelength (over 35 miles) is *very* long compared to the coil height, so it's radiation efficiency is almost zero.

      C) The two coils operate in opposite phase, so the electric fields will tend to cancel at a distance.

      Of greater concern will be the actual *acoustic* noise... which might be upwards of 10's of kilowatts.
      -Greg Leyh

    11. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      How about the salt plains where they do the testing for jet cars? Middle of the Mojave desert? Detroit? (OK, the last one was mean) Easter Island would be cool, you could dress up the coils to look like Moai. Hell of a tourist attraction. "Come see our lightning God-statues."

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    12. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by ambrandt · · Score: 1

      It should be the finale for the next Burning Man... bring out The Man (with a giant grounding rod built into him), then truck over the towers and light him up with lightning!

    13. Re:Where to put a 10' story Tesla coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the radiated output from the coils will be quite low, owing to several factors:

      A) The operating frequency is *very* low, only 5200 Hz. This is actually *below* the frequency range the FCC controls.

      But the reason spark-gap transmitters aren't allowed is because they're horrifically broad-band -- you don't have a 5200Hz sine wave, you have 10400 impulsive peaks per second. And while it's of course not so bad as a true dirac impulse (with infinite bandwidth), your own estimate above ("10's of microseconds") suggests the bulk of the power will be well above 10kHz -- potentially interfering with various navigation systems -- I know LORAN and NDBs are in this range.

      I doubt the signal will be strong enough to be a serious problem, but I believe it'll be worse than you think, and probably in violation of FCC regulations.

  13. Command & Conquer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm having horrible flashbacks to C&C: Red Alert.

  14. Things that make you go BOOM! by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm having horrible flashbacks to C&C: Red Alert.

    I'm having horrible flashbacks to C&C: Music Factory.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  15. Do NOT try to suppress it. by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    That is as stupid of an idea as Gates' idea of stopping hurricanes or wiping out mosquitoes. Lightening likely does a LOT of good since nature has grown up with it. Instead, we should be trying to figure out how to harness it. That is a good source of renewable energy.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nature has "grown up" with hemlock as well you stupid mutt, it does not make hemlock a good thing to eat, or useful in any way. Stfu or learn some science. Nature is mindless and does not know anything, it does not matter what is or is not in nature. Man decides what is and is not useful, and Man uses it as he pleases.

    2. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Annirak · · Score: 2

      This is a TERRIBLE source of renewable energy. Lightning is a pulsed power source, where our demands are essentially steady. Lightning is caused either by wind or solar wind (charged particles accumulating in the atmosphere), so why not pick that up directly? We have wind turbines and solar cells. These are far more sensible than lightning as a power source.

      And for reference, wind power is effectively solar, since wind is cause by uneven absorption of solar radiation, which causes convection currents.

    3. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - lightening has helped a lot of things. It helps me find things in the dark, most importantly.

      If we do away with this fundamental feature of nature, how will we ever find things?! Curse you, mad men of science!

    4. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      Well, lets see:

      Production of O3 that protects us from UV. I think that is a big one.
      Starts forest fires every so often that restarts the growth cycles (which shows that nature has adopted to NEEDING lightening).
      Miller/Urey's experiments showing that lightening's impact on various chemicals made a number of base molecules that life needed. I would say that suggests that many more molecules are produced by lightening than we realize, that are likely absorb by bacteria, plant, or some other bottom feeders.

      And that was just a few positives from Lightening.

      Now, as to hemlock, it has a number of interesting issues. A number of animals are somewhat immune to it, so with multiple feedings on it, they build up a quasi immunity to it. That means that other animals that enter the area and attempt to eat the plant will succumb to it. Interestingly, there is evidence that hemlock alkaloids build up in small quantities in herbivores such that if a predator kills and eats them, they die (think mercury in our ecosystem).
      Point is, that nature has adopted and used hemlock.

      What an idiot and asshole you are. Pretending to be somebody that knows something of science. You remind me of another troll (flyinwhitey, ifwm and a few other logins that that idiot had).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or useful in any way.

      People who don't understand the place that plants have in our ecosystem should really not be calling others 'stupid mutt'.

      Or do you not breathe, dickcheese?

    6. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      So what if it is pulsed? It is ALWAYS happening around the world. ALWAYS. And in large large large quantities per strike. 5 billion joules for a small strike. If it is possible to encourage a strike and to get it to hit a particular area, then this can be used in storage (thermal? Electrical?) or simply converts H2O to 2 H2 and O2. One normal storm can actually power all of USA for 20 minutes. And a storm in the midwest (very wicked strong storms) can power all of the USA for several hours. Keep in mind that just 60 years ago, if you told ppl that they could get direct electricity from the sun, few would believe you. More importantly, most would say that it was not useful. Finally, what is wind and solar, but pulsed energy as well. Just for longer durations. But you have ZERO control over these, where as, it is POSSIBLE to control lightening.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lightening

      Every time I see someone misspell lightning that way, I think of this.

    8. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Let's first try to fully understand the phenomenon, so we can be better prepared for it.

      Then as a source of energy: well maybe, but going to be hard. A strike may carry a lot of energy, it's also short, and as such the energy density is huge. Hard to capture and store (and we're not exactly good at storing energy to begin with). And it's unreliable: you never know when and where the next one strikes.

    9. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy peazy, dump the discharge into electro-resistive heating elements that heat up a pool of insulated molten salts. An average energy content of 5 billion joules per strike is only about enough energy to run a single clothes dryer for a year though.

    10. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      Well, lets see:

      Production of O3 that protects us from UV. I think that is a big one.

      What an idiot and asshole you are. Pretending to be somebody that knows something of science. You remind me of another troll (flyinwhitey, ifwm and a few other logins that that idiot had).

      This is not correct. O3 in the stratosphere is produced by UV-B splitting oxygen.

      O3 produced by lightning never gets anywhere near the stratosphere. Mostly stuck on the surface where exposure can be harmful to humans.

      Last time I checked we are ALL clueless idiots. Disparging others is like a bunch of retards arguing over who is the smarter retard.

    11. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Lazarian · · Score: 2

      Lightning is actually an important source of nitrogen fixation for plants. Nitrogen oxides produced from lightning combine with atmospheric water produces nitrous and nitric acids, and when precipitated back into soil becomes a crucial nutrient source for plants worldwide.

    12. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must admit, it was quite usefull to find my master's castle when I was lost a couple of years back.

      -Igor.

    13. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for reference, wind power is effectively solar, since wind is cause by uneven absorption of solar radiation, which causes convection currents.

      Not entirely. The Earth spins, and the points furthest from the center move slower (think of gears). That means the atmosphere which is loosely bound to the planet is being dragged by its rotation.

    14. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, lightning occurs up in the stratosphere and above and does produce O3 up there as well.

      As to the disparaging comments, based on the AC's style, I am pretty certain that it is the guy that I thought it was. I once googled him because he was so nasty and figured out that he had multiple logins here and on other sites (flyinwhitey/IFWM/several others). He was a real loser from IIRC NJ, but living in Florida on a base (either navy or af; I have forgotten which one). In one of his blogs, he was proudly boasting of taking his dog out for a walk and having it shit on a neighbor's yard because he hated the guy and knew that he was not home. Then he went on to rip all of these other ppl that he knew. He was a real winner. Finally, he would login under different ones to comment back to himself with attempted slightly different styles of comments to support himself via comments. But the guy was such a wicked individual, that he ran around disparaging all sorts of ppl for no reason, other than to put others down. Worse, it appeared that he was doing a number of slurs, which just grated on me. And there was no reason to report him, since he would just go around and create new logins which would mean that I would have to later figure out who he was again. As it was, because he always did AC along with several or more of his logins on the pages, I used the logins to know that he was posting and would then see the AC postings with his style.

      So, sorry, but I think that the AC that wrote that was the same guy. Basically, the creep is back.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    15. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Thanx, I did not know about that one, however I guessed that there some chemical reactions. I pointed out to another person some of the other uses (O3, forest fires, and finally, urey/miller). The urey/miller suggests that lightning will create a number of useful compounds and here you show just that. I am guessing that there are others useful chemicals that are created and taken up via first level life.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    16. Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lightning is actually an important source of nitrogen fixation for plants. Nitrogen oxides produced from lightning combine with atmospheric water produces nitrous and nitric acids, and when precipitated back into soil becomes a crucial nutrient source for plants worldwide.

      That's an interesting hypothesis you have there. Perhaps if you had some data to back up such bold claims, it might actually be believable. Until then, I'll maintain my current opinion that the lightning itself does not add any significant quantity of nutrients at all. Rather, it's the fires which result from lightning strikes which provide the benefits you're referring to.

  16. the RFI will be a mess by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    I hope they dont build those damned things anywhere near my house,

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  17. This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by mark_reh · · Score: 5, Informative

    and it's wrong. Tesla coils produce high frequency -i.e AC- discharges at very high voltage and very low current. Lightning, on the other hand is a DC or very low frequency phenomenon combining extremely high voltages with extremely high currents. The currents are so high that they instantaneously heat the air and produce a loud boom- you may have heard it before- it's called thunder.

    If he really wanted to duplicate lightning he'd charge up some big capacitors to extremely high voltages and draw arcs between their terminals. THAT would be a better simulation of lightning than the output of any Tesla coil.

    Major props to the guy for marketing his idea. It's been picked up by every news agency from here to Mumbai. I'm sure he'll get the funding he needs to go through with the project.

    1. Re:This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by Annirak · · Score: 1

      Or maybe go with van der graaf generators instead.

    2. Re:This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      If he really wanted to duplicate lightning he'd charge up some big capacitors to extremely high voltages and draw arcs between their terminals. THAT would be a better simulation of lightning than the output of any Tesla coil.

      Say, a Cockroft-Walton generator?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No current, just voltage and not enough of that.

    4. Re:This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Again, no current and not enough voltage.

      Listen up, lightning bolts are commonly 10,000 AMPERES. One in 100 is over 100,000 Amps. Van-de-Graffs are a just a few microamps. Cockroft-Waltons might hit .1 amps. On a good day. A high voltage supercapacitor might peak out at 1000 amps. A few times, then it's toast.

    5. Re:This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      More like a Marx generator.

    6. Re:This story is everywhere in the last two weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, lightning is actually AC.

  18. Yay! by vuo · · Score: 1

    >Tesla Roadster

    Seems like there's an extra "d" in there.

    Anyway, maybe this will finally prove or disprove the conspiracy theories about Nicola Tesla's wireless power transmission system. Alternatively, at least tesla coils as in C&C become reality. A great replacement for landmines, now that the boo-hoo pacifists try to ban them.

  19. Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The very first communications of human origin that alien civilizations might receive will come from Nikola Tesla's attempt to broadcast electrical power through the air a little over a century ago. Provided they have sensitive and directional enough receivers, and can somehow filter out the radio noise from the Sun, that would mean that any civilization within a little over a hundred light years might already be trying to respond to us.

    A while back I asked on an astronomy newsgroup, how far away could a civilization with the level of technology that humanity presently has, detect our own radio signals?

    The sorrowful answer was that it was only three light years, which is a light year short of the distance to our nearest stellar neighbor, Alpha Centauri, which is also not likely to have any planets that could harbor life. The SETI researcher who responded also said that our strongest radio transmitters are the Distant Early Warning radars that the United States uses to watch for an incoming nuclear attack from the Soviets. That implies that we are only "communicating" with aliens who are in a generally northward direction relative to the earth.

    I then asked how SETI hoped to hear from any aliens at all. His answer was that we expect that more advanced civilizations would transmit far more powerful radio signals. That doesn't seem right to me, unless they are specifically trying to communicate with other civilizations, as I would expect more advanced technology to result in lower radio power, rather than more, both to conserve energy and to enable more devices to use the available spectrum.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by turing_m · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The very first communications of human origin that alien civilizations might receive will come from Nikola Tesla's attempt to broadcast electrical power through the air a little over a century ago. Provided they have sensitive and directional enough receivers, and can somehow filter out the radio noise from the Sun, that would mean that any civilization within a little over a hundred light years might already be trying to respond to us.

      I wonder what exactly they are going to respond to us with. e.g. "Ahh... looks like another civilization just invented radio communications. Very smart of them. It seems their intelligence is only matched by their carelessness. I think it's about time to clue them in as to why they have yet to find intelligent life on any other planet in the galaxy. For a brief second or two they will finally know that there IS life on other planets."

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    2. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I then asked how SETI hoped to hear from any aliens at all. His answer was that we expect that more advanced civilizations would transmit far more powerful radio signals. That doesn't seem right to me, unless they are specifically trying to communicate with other civilizations, as I would expect more advanced technology to result in lower radio power, rather than more, both to conserve energy and to enable more devices to use the available spectrum.

      Equally importantly: as civilization advances, it uses more efficient compression algorithms, which make its transmissions look more like pure noise, and harder to identify as an intentional signal.

      So yes, SETI is primarily looking for a signal intended as a communication to us.

    3. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I kind of doubt that, your not going to get very far from the atmosphere with random scattered noise, atmospheric bounce is something people tend to forget about when talking about sending random radio waves off into space, which is why it takes a pretty specific effort to do it currently.

    4. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall reading in a fairly authoritative tome (can't recall which though) that two Arecibo's (Arecibi?) could muster a bit per hour or so if they were on opposite sides of our galaxy. Mind, they both need to know where to look and have state of the art receivers and funding.
      Ah!
      H. Paul Shuch . Proc. of SPIE 2704, 80 (1996)

    5. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      There was a 2 part sci-fi story that covers this. Greg Bear's "Forge of God" and "Anvil of Stars." First book blows up Earth, 2nd book humans blow up bad guys (with help from the good aliens). Unfortunately is these books, the realization lasted for at least a few days before boomtime.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    6. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by turing_m · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised that the idea has been done before as a book. Thanks for providing a pointer.

      Somewhere, someplace there is a properly paranoid intelligence out there that is or has shunned the development of radio technology for that very reason (perhaps some sort of hive mind able to exert control over rogue experimentation? It wasn't us though, so I hope for our sake that there is some sort of Mutual Assured Destruction that prevents the doomsday response to the first radio communication, or physical difficulty or impossibility involved.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    7. Re:Great! They'll communicate with aliens too! by Jonner · · Score: 1

      People can't accurately predict much about the progression of human technology even a few decades into the future. Anyone who thinks they can predict what hypothetical alien technology would be like is delusional in the extreme.

  20. Talking to the right people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the right number, several possible startups already exist. http://www.flickr.com/photos/justinkent/140341111/

    Although, I'm sure some of them are not legal.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Td--Hltuol

    Or Good for You.. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=giant+tesla+coils+in+russia&oq=giant+tesla+coils+in+russia&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=18110l28969l0l29610l27l27l0l10l10l0l297l3564l0.8.9l17l0 Sorry if any of these links are down.. seem to have struck a nerve with someone!

  21. Soviets had gigantic Tesla coils decades ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Soviets had gigantic Tesla coils decades ago.
    Search the web and you will easily find pictures.

  22. Understanding how lightning forms by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Somehow, I don't think clouds have ten story tesla coils.

  23. Radio waves. Meh. by PPH · · Score: 2

    That's what aliens will say.

    We've got to push the limits of our understanding of physics and imagine more advanced methods of communications. Ones that could be directed at distant solar systems and get around the speed of light restrictions on communications latency.

    I'm thinking along the lines of wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges). Assume that advanced civilizations will have figured out all the problems involved with sending these things around the universe and popping them open in front of target civilizations. Given the energy requirements needed to open one big enough to step through, this probably isn't what they'll use. But what about a wormhole just big enough to send a series of photons through (think fiber optics). We find one end of such a wormhole floating by, we grab it and look at it with an opto sensor. If it looks like we've got intelligence on the other end, we're in business.

    We don't need to solve the physics of how to open or send such a wormhole. Leave that up to the more advanced civilization. All we have to do is recognize the end that's floating by locally, grab it and examine it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  24. some kinds of signals may be not quite random by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1

    you're correct that compression generally makes the data look random. but some compressed formats have highly nonrandom components. bzip2 is organized into blocks so that if one block is corrupted the remaining blocks can be reliably decompressed.

    high quality encryption cannot appear completely random, because every arbitrarily long random sequence has arbitrarily long sequences of any arbitrary bit pattern. suppose you used a radioactive source to generate a binary one time pad, then xored your cleartext with it. you'll someday find out the hard way that you transmitted "attack at dawn" in cleartext because your one time pad contained a long string of zeroes!

    thus we could detect encrypted signals by watching for signals that appear TOO random. there are many statistical tests for randomness. I expect some of them could distinguish an encrypted signal from pure noise.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:some kinds of signals may be not quite random by alannon · · Score: 2

      While I see your point, if you have a truly random entropy source, ANY xored combination of cleartext and cyphertext could (incorrectly) appear to form any arbitrary message in the encrypted message.

      grep "attack at dawn" /dev/random (and wait a while. Probably a LONG while.)

  25. only low frequencies bounce off the ionosphere by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1

    that's cities have fm radio but rural radio stations are generally the lower frequency am.

    which tesla coils are driven by sixty hertz alternating current, they get their incredibly high voltage by preventing a large inductance from conducting. inductors are current source that will develop any voltage necessary to continue conducting. eventually there is a powerful but very short-lived arc that also generates a very high frequency radio signal.

    that's also why you shouldn't mess with large inductors if you don't know what you're doing. when high energy electrons strike the inner orbital electrons of high atomic number electrons the photon that's emitted from the collission is an x-Ray. that can give you Th3 C4nc3r.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  26. What a Colossal waste of money! by FlyingGuy · · Score: 0

    Control Lightning? Really! Control fucking lightning?

    I am about as liberal as you can get when it comes to funding science but this rates right up there with Paranormal Research.

    We built a 4 foot tall one of these when I was in High School. We used window glass and sheet metal for the capacitor and two pennies for the spark gap and it created a wonderful halo of radiated electricity, lit all the florescent bulbs in the room and it was cool, but a 100' tall version? Just say no. We have just a few more important things to spend our money on eight about now.

    --
    Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
  27. Red Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this in Command & Conquer. BTDT.

  28. What was a Tesla Coil made for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Tesla coil was not designed to make any arcs or sparks at all. Sir Oliver Lodge was responsible for such things, not Tesla.

  29. Tesla was 100 years ahead of his time by nido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the neater things I've read about is how Lockheed Martin went back to Tesla's technology to make a communication system for miners:

    A magnetic-wave generator developed by Nikola Tesla over 100 years ago as a wireless communication device has been updated by engineers at Lockheed Martin to save lives after mining disasters.

    Magnetic waves -- unlike radio waves -- can penetrate hundreds of metres of solid rock. MagneLink, the fridge-sized device developed by Lockheed Martin, allows for phone calls and text messaging. It was tested this year at a mine in Virginia, and production is expected before 2011.

    -Nikola Tesla’s patent redux (very short)

    Heres another link: Tapping Tesla to Save Trapped Miners

    If Tesla was 100 years ahead of everyone else, that means we should be plugging our devices into the Aether ("The wheelwork of nature") soon.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:Tesla was 100 years ahead of his time by westlake · · Score: 1

      Ultra low frequency radio waves also penetrate deep into rock.

      The PED system has been around since 1990. It is one-way only and used for paging and remote control. The receivers can be intergrated into a miner's cap lamp.

      PED Communication and Early Warning System

  30. Natural lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else misread the subject as natural lighting? (Even the summary, as quoted, has it wrong at the beginning.) I was picturing artificial daylight in communal areas, such as city parks. Or replacement of the incandescent lights at home. Giant electric arcs... very cool!

  31. You cannot walk through a wormhole by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2

    you'll come out the other side as a largely random sequence of random types of fundamental particles, mostly photons. trust me. while I only playvacsoftware engineer on the Internet, I really am a physicist.

    you could through one though.

    I spent quite a long time puzzling overbhowbto encode a signal so that any alien that was capable of detecting it would bevquite certainbwas transmitted by intelligent beings. just for our signal to be nonrandom would be insufficient, as there are many physical processes that generate powerful nonrandom signals. pulsars are quickly rotating, highly magnetic collapsedvstars, butvwere thought at first to be signals from alien civilizations.

    you also need a way for your signal to stabbed out from the enormous radio noise of the sun.

    transmit pulse sequences with the number of pulses being a prime number withba modest pause in between. pause in between each sequence then transmit the next larger prime number. repeat until you get to a very large prime then startbover again with two.

    to overcome solar noise, use an interferometer. two antennas spaced far apart have the same resolution as a single antenna as wide as the distance between the two. if you control the relative phase of your antennas you can focus yourvtransmittedvsignal with the same resolution. the focussed signal would appear more powerful than the sun's signal because it diminishes with the square of the distance.

    such antennas could be placed in solar orbit at the earths lagrange points, with solar or nuclear power. they could transmit in many different directions simultaneously by altering their phases.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  32. fucking autocorrect! by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1

    when I type a correctly spelled word replaces itbwith some completely unrelated word. when I really do misspell a word the ios doesn't correct it.

    my single most common error is to type v or b instead of space, but autocorrect doesn't know howbto fix that.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:fucking autocorrect! by heinousjay · · Score: 0

      Have you not updated recently? It definitely does replace mistakenly joined words.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  33. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to get the right Igor...

    http://www.popfi.com/wp-content/uploads/marty-feldman-igor.jpg

    PS -- Marty Feldman for the win!

  34. Siberian Institute for Power Engineering? Really? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy shit, if I were a supervillain, that's exactly the sort of institute that I'd want to run. They probably say: "What happens in Siberia stays in Siberia, except for the bits that were accidentally atomized. Those are floating around somewhere in the upper atmosphere." Also, they probably say: "In Siberia, a couple of people can hear you scream, but nobody really gives a fuck."

  35. Lightning as a power source? by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

    Is anyone looking into harnessing lightning's electrical power? There are many tall structures that are hit by lightning regularly, and they're virtually all located among electricity-hungry populations. I'm no EE, and obviously you can't just wire a lightning rod to a battery array, but could you not cascade the power through first an array of a shitload of small capacitors (can charge/discharge fast and handle high current) wired in parallel, which then charges one or more arrays of larger capacitors (can retain high charge capacity), which then charge batteries? Even if you only get a percentage and let most of the electricity go to the ground, it's gotta be worth the investment I figure. It would be possible to make a mobile rig and go where the storms are too.

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
    1. Re:Lightning as a power source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is anyone looking into harnessing lightning's electrical power?

      Nope. And the thought has never even crossed anybody's mind. Ever. And never will.

      Wait, made from electricity, you say? Well then, stop the fucking presses!

    2. Re:Lightning as a power source? by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that with current technology one would have to expend more energy manufacturing the capacitors and such than would be collected over the life of the system. Not to mention that if something went wrong the failure mode for an extremely overloaded capacitor is a large explosion. Not something you want happening in a dense population center.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  36. District 9 weapon by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this make you think of the weapons the aliens (the "Prawns", what a great name) used in Distrcit 9? What a cool (and terrifying) weapon, caused the people to EXPLODE upon being shot at (presumably from the instant vaporization of all the water in their bodies).

    Would this device cause the same thing to happen if it could be used at a weapon? I heard that some scientists had figured out how to direct lightning bolts using (relatively) low powered lasers to create an ionized pathway in the air. So using a laser with this could possibly make a "lightning gun", no? Even if this weapon was large and bulky I think the psychological effects would be huge if it were used in something like crowd control!

    Is it true that District 9 was made on a very low budget. If so, the special effects were excellent, the aliens and other CG elements looked completely believable and well integrated (correct movement, lighting, shadows, etc.).

  37. Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 1890s, Tesla experimented with the concept as a possible alternative to Marconi's wireless telegraph. But the device's relatively short range and high signal noise made it impractical for widespread use. Short range is not a problem in most mine situations, explains engineer David LeVan, who led the Lockheed Martin research team. The devices the group developed, called the MagneLink Magnetic Communication System, combine a refrigerator-size magnetic generator with a briefcase-size receiving antenna.

    Brilliant yes, but note the shortcomings in both the range, S/N, and the size of both transmitters and receivers. To be truly successful one needs to go beyond the "ah ha" moments, and overcome the practical barrier as well. Tesla didn't do that and that's why history is the way it is.

    1. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Tesla didn't do that and that's why history is the way it is.

      Nope. It has nothing to do with practicality as we know it. History is the way it is regarding Tesla due to Edison's obsession with money and fame. Tesla had the brilliant ideas and brilliant inventions... but no one could figure out how to regulate (i.e. charge for) wireless power. Tesla's inventions were superior to Edison's similar work, and Edison knew this... but Edison's wired power was simple to meter. This and this alone is why we use wired power... because no one could fathom having free, wireless electricity.

    2. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla didn't do that and that's why history is the way it is.

      Tesla had the brilliant ideas and brilliant inventions... but no one could figure out how to regulate (i.e. charge for) wireless power.

      Or extend the range, increase the S/N, or reduce the size of his magnetic-wave generator. And I'm sure some of his other "brilliant" inventions had other shortcoming for the time. Once again brilliant ideas doesn't equal success.

    3. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey numnuts, Edison's wired power was DC. Tesla's was AC. As far as his wireless power generating idea goes it was very inefficient and needed a power plant roughly every 40 miles.

      There is no conspiracy, it was just a bad idea.

    4. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2
      Edison's original design required powerplants every few miles. It was DC and you back then you couldn't tranform DC up and down as easily. This is very bad for the efficiency of long lines.

      The problem with DC was that the power plants could economically deliver DC electricity only to customers within about one and a half miles (about 2.4 km) from the generating station

      Now Tesla's design was based on AC and thus it could be transformed, allowing for long distance transport. I don't know how wireless fitted into that, but I can assume the powerplants could be far from the actual transmitters.
      note: nowadays the supply lines for extremely long distances are DC again because of induction losses, but it's usually converted to 500KV with step up converters of various designs they didn't have back then.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    5. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by catmistake · · Score: 1

      There is no conspiracy, it was just a bad idea.

      Hey, dipshit troll, it was Edison's DC lines that needed a power plant every 40 miles.

      Also, let's not forget that of the over 1000 patents Tesla has been awarded, most of them... roughly 75%... are still classified secret. This is quite the nursery for conspiracy.

    6. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Also, let's not forget that of the over 1000 patents Tesla has been awarded, most of them... roughly 75%... are still classified secret. This is quite the nursery for conspiracy.

      The amount of crackpottery surrounding Tesla is roughly 75% of his actual accomplishments.

      I would ask for a credible citation but I know the drill "classified" "secret" ... HAARP is watching U.

    7. Re:Tesla was 100 years behind practicality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you're just another Edison-promoting stooge.

  38. Here's the Gizmodo article and commentary by mark_reh · · Score: 1
  39. Re:What a Colossal waste of money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/cam2.html

    With this you can super heat the ionosphere, control the cooling plasma, heat up earth's ambient temperatures, light up the night sky, change the high weather patterns, steer hurricanes, bounce it of the highest realms of the ionosphere, shred the magnetosphere, open earth up to the sun's naughty flares, create floods, how about some earthquakes? You can communicate way down under the oceans, search for submarines, search for underground industrial complexes and generally cook any one you want all the while sending messages to their brains as it operates at human biological frequencies telling us all how much we are going to enjoy the next really big thing.

    Tah!

  40. Re:Siberian Institute for Power Engineering? Reall by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    Also, they probably say: "In Siberia, a couple of people can hear you scream, but nobody really gives a fuck."

    That's not entirely true. My late grandmother was held in a bona fide Siberian prison camp for a while. The other prisoners there can hear you, and probably do care some, but are generally powerless to do anything about it.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  41. Lightning protection by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what they hope to figure out beyond what we've all known for a hundred years.

    If you don't want to be zapped make sure your not charged or the best path to ground and you have nothing to worry about.

  42. Make them tetrahedral coils! by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Repeat the Philadelphia experiment! I still want to know what happened! - for real

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  43. Big coils? Think twice! by multatuli · · Score: 1

    Read 'Micro' before hitting the 'on' switch ... ;-)

  44. High energy particles by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    Will it include a cyclotron to make the high energy particles that are theorised to create the original conductive path wich allows the real lightning to travel far further than it should? The high energy particles may not be the reason, but this setup may be part of what's required to test it.
    14 million volts should only jump up to 50 meters (or about 150 feet) or so, depending on the shape of the electrodes (33 KV/cm is a rule of thumb for perfect spherical electrodes, usually it's lower). No where near the hundreds of meters needed to cross air-ground.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  45. What exactly is the difference? by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    What the article fails to mention is what exactly the difference is between the arcs created by (smaller) tesla coils now and natural lightning. Is it that natural lightning needs lower voltage to travel longer distances through air than teslas? This would explain, why they need to built giant tesla coils in the first place.

  46. Tesla's legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that's Tesla my dear brothers and sisters, what else to say other than that. How many other technologies were "accidentally forgotten" by the leading New World Order. Not to mention that all of Tesla's legacy is so great that one lifetime is simply to small for a total and complete understanding.

    Greetings from Serbia:)

  47. A whole new meaning by Rasperin · · Score: 1

    This gives a whole new meaning to Diablo 2: LOD. Shit, I'd be scared of that shit.

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  48. In other news... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    ...LOD team's equipment struck by lightning; all progress lost.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  49. fucking lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're allowed to proofread your prose before clicking that submit button, y'know.

  50. Bad Science.. Tesla Coil isn't static electricity! by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

    Uhm.. a Vandergraaf Generator generates a static charge. A Tesla Coil is used to produce AC voltages my Tesla Coil has a 3" coil and a resonate frequency of 4300hz. This is far from lightning. Lightning is a static discharge. Check out the large Vandergraaf Generator at the Boston Museum of science. That is what you will need. A Tesla Coil is a completely different animal.

  51. Suppress Lighting - really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Par for the course. There are outstanding arguments about how the environment currently works (global warming vs sun spots, weather in Colorado that defies prediction) and a group of scientists want to learn enough about lightning to prevent it from happening. About 20 years after that happens they will probably have to study why bees are no longer pollinating. They should spend their time trying to power a flux capacitor instead.

  52. My iPad runs iOS 3.2.2 by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1

    I do that so I can verify that my iOS App runs properly on old firmware releases.

    Yes, it is a huge PITA, but I don't want to require that my users upgrade their firmware.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  53. Greg on wired.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wired.com also did a video on Greg and the Lightning Foundry

    http://www.wired.com/video/latest-videos/latest/1815816633/diy-tesla-coils-will-shoot-260foot-lightning-bolt/1303110457001