Slashdot Mirror


Brazilian Schoolchildren Tagged By Computer Chips

New submitter smi.james.th writes with an AP story, and extracts from it: "'Grade-school students in a northeastern Brazilian city are using uniforms embedded with computer chips that alert parents if they are cutting classes, the city's education secretary, Coriolano Moraes, said Thursday.' Personally I don't find this too inspiring. Mr. Orwell certainly has warned the world about this."

288 comments

  1. Oh the possibilities by schrodingersGato · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I sure hope pedophiles in Brazil can't hack or learn to hack. Holy crap this is bad on so many levels

    1. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, 'cause predatory paedophiles will have such a hard time finding kids otherwise, right?

    2. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Finding kids, no. But, like any anti-social looking for a victim, it would help them find children in compromised situations where neither the victim, their family, nor the public will prevent the act, nor prosecute the offender. Or, do you think these fucks actually pick someone at random?

    3. Re:Oh the possibilities by jordanjay29 · · Score: 2

      Lo-tech hacking method, just put your t-shirt in your locker, slip on a different one and skip class anyways. GPS is happy and so is the kid.

    4. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you can find a "pedophile angle" for pretty much anything.
      With that said, this is stupid and I don't have any reason to defend it.

    5. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Certainly not at random, no, given that the vast majority of the time it's a family member or friend who perpetrates the offence.

    6. Re:Oh the possibilities by jorlando · · Score: 2

      Schools (public or private) in Brazil don't have lockers for students. Maybe some private schools that area modelled after foreign schools.

    7. Re:Oh the possibilities by hawguy · · Score: 2

      I sure hope pedophiles in Brazil can't hack or learn to hack. Holy crap this is bad on so many levels

      I don't understand what kind of RFID hack will help a pedophile?

      What good will it do to be able to scan the t-shirt of the kid walking by his van and know that it's child #1231812421?

      It doesn't appear that the RFID chips will contain any identifying information, and why should they -- they just need a number to link the child to the database.

      Besides, most kids (at least in the USA) these days are already broadcasting a unique ID through their phone's Wifi MAC address or unencrypted cell phone signalling.

    8. Re:Oh the possibilities by icebraining · · Score: 2

      It's not a GPS, just RFID.

    9. Re:Oh the possibilities by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh my god take off your tinfoil hat! This is a basic RFID asset tracking system. It identifies who is in a building at any given time and is no more intrusive than a roll call system.

      So what if a pedophile gets access to the system. It's not like they can track the movements of the person anywhere they are with it.

    10. Re:Oh the possibilities by Cazekiel · · Score: 1

      Let's say the pedo-hacker, good at what he does, has a preference: a young girl, aged 13, blonde, tiny. Let's say he goes on facebook and finds that preference: name, location, school they go to. Let's say he knows how to get into this chip-system, which might just list their names or giveaway-details (which may or may not be the case, but for argument's sake, it does). Oh hey, there's lil' Jenny McVulnerable, waiting outside for the bus stop.

      Yea I know, it's not the USUAL, but things like this bring up the UN-usual.

      --
      You want to know how to help your kids? LEAVE THEM THE F*&K ALONE. --George Carlin
    11. Re:Oh the possibilities by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's say the pedo-hacker, good at what he does, has a preference: a young girl, aged 13, blonde, tiny. Let's say he goes on facebook and finds that preference: name, location, school they go to. Let's say he knows how to get into this chip-system, which might just list their names or giveaway-details (which may or may not be the case, but for argument's sake, it does). Oh hey, there's lil' Jenny McVulnerable, waiting outside for the bus stop.

      Yea I know, it's not the USUAL, but things like this bring up the UN-usual.

      Since he's such an uber-hacker, he could just hack into the school's ID card database, and download student pictures, home address, parents' names, possibly siblings and emergency contact info, then he can intercept the kid and say "omg Josh, your mom Mary and Uncle Joe were in a terrible accident, your sister Maria is already at the hospital, they sent me to pick you up".

      This RFID system doesn't add a risk that's not already there.

    12. Re:Oh the possibilities by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 0

      Well it actually might - if the system detects that a child has LEFT school early (cutting classes or whatever), you know WHO you are going after that day. And you also know that the child is either alone, or with only one friend, or what not.

      I'm totally against this system just for standard surveillance reasons, and it won't be long before kids figure out how to clone or reset their equipment to someone elses, but the first rule of cracking a system is gather as much information as possible - an RFID tag that tells me which kid is currently out of school - gold.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    13. Re:Oh the possibilities by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People are not assets, and should not be tracked.

      A perceived increase in security is never worth a tangible loss in freedoms.

      The danger is the children growing up and thinking this is okay everywhere they go. It is most emphatically, not okay .

      There can be exceptions, for adults only, in high security businesses. In those situations it will be a choice, and most likely well compensated. Tracking systems like this should never, ever, be acceptable in public and daily life, and certainly not for children. They should grow up thinking such systems are weird, intrusive, and only required in the most serious of circumstances.

      People need to fucking grow a pair and realize that life is dangerous. Have some courage and face life head on, and stop being such cowards trading away your freedoms at every corner for shiny trinkets and illusions of a safer world with a better informed authority.

    14. Re:Oh the possibilities by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Certainly not at random, no, given that the vast majority of the time it's a family member or friend who perpetrates the offence.

      In this case, a pedophile befriending someone in order to gain access to their children is a form of hacking, so people don't have to "learn" much except know that others are genuinely gullible on a social level.

    15. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are not assets, and should not be tracked.
      A perceived increase in security is never worth a tangible loss in freedoms.

      People are assets, and people have been tracked since the beginning of recorded history. Slapping "Using an electronic device" on the practice of taking roll-call doesn't change jack shit from what it was hundreds of years ago, so spare us the dramatics.

    16. Re:Oh the possibilities by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      People are assets

      s/ets/hats/

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Oh the possibilities by solidraven · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here we go, again another round of 1980 hysteria in the "government is going to track our every move" category.
      First of all, if they wanted to track you; then they'd sure as hell do it no matter what. They don't need high tech gadgets to do that either.
      But on to RFID. Our student ID cards at college/university here work by RFID. We use them to open doors, as copy cards, to pay for food in the cafeteria... . So you end up with a bunch of (electronic/electrical) engineering students with RFID cards that you actually get to store money on indirectly (its kept on the server how much money is on the card). So there are enough reasons to duplicate somebody else's card. Contrary to what you might be thinking, not a single person has even managed to do that successfully. The encoding is fairly tricky and just replicating it is extremely hard.
      What we did try was to track each other using the RFID tags in these cards (as that's considerably easier than trying to reverse engineer them). The thing is, a tracking range of a whole 15cm isn't all that useful last time I checked. So claiming you can track people through these tags is foolish. Unless if they're passing through lets say a door frame.
      So I seriously doubt that any high school kid will be able to figure it out that easily, all this does is save the school some time in the morning by being able to skip the daily roll call.

    18. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't say there are downsides, even really bad ones. But we don't really know the circumstances and therefore it might be possible that the result could be positive.

    19. Re:Oh the possibilities by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So it won't be any use to a nonce because it only stores a nonce?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Oh the possibilities by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      Not true. In the past, it was far, far more difficult to track people. Now it's possible to do it with great precision, and be nearly everywhere at once (cameras). And you can store the memory.

    21. Re:Oh the possibilities by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, but think about it. Being able to find someone cutting class and starting with "Now, little girl, shouldn't you be at school...?" is a good starter to have someone you can abuse who won't tell on you in fear they'll "incriminate" themselves. So far, those ratbastards had to hang out at the mall and keep an eye out for kids cutting class and hence susceptible to abuse because they think they cannot tell, now all they need to do is to scan the mall electronically and find their targets.

      This is so wrong on so many levels it just ain't even funny.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:Oh the possibilities by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not wanting to break NDAs but it's not as unusual as you think. The scenario you paint is quite scarily real.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Oh the possibilities by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not for the hacker you paint. But RFIDs are much easier to hack than the average school database (dear reader, we know the obligatory xkcd comic, don't bother linking). So no, it won't make it easier for THIS hacker, but it broadens the field because this is no longer a "custom hack" where a hacker has to hack this specific database, but it has become a hack-for-purchase, where one such asshat has to come up with a way to do it, then sell the tool so even a non-technical person can use it.

      For reference, see trojan kits.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:Oh the possibilities by EdZ · · Score: 1

      People are not assets, and should not be tracked.

      Remember that next time you enter a large building with a sign in/out register, and refuse to put your name in it. Those are there for a reason: so that if the building catches fire/has a gas leak/some other reason for evacuation, they have some idea who still needs to be rescued. But notice employees don't have to sign it: that's because they have those swanky ID cards to swipe in with, which do the same job.

      This system is the same, except the swanky ID card is sewn into the uniform.

    25. Re:Oh the possibilities by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

      Because that's all pedophiles need is a PedoBear Radar. ;-)

      --
      There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
    26. Re:Oh the possibilities by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This is NOT an issue of freedoms. You are free not to go to school. The school is free to inform the parents who enrolled you that you're not getting your monies worth.

      I don't think there's a single person in the world deluded enough to think that by entering someone else's property, the ability for that person to know where on the property you are is some how giving up some miracle freedom.

      But I'm sure you'll disagree quite vehemently until one day your daughter's school burns down and you question why they didn't know that she was still in the building. This happens to be a freedom I happily give up on a daily basis when I use a swipecard to get into my building at work.

      Are you the same person who suggested the best solution to improve road safety was to replace airbags with a giant spike pointed towards the driver? This isn't the TSA. There are well documented and measurable improvements in the survival rate of a giant building fire if you can account for every person in the building instantly. Why the hell should I make my life any less safer than I have to all in the name of a freedom I can't rightly expect on someone else's property?

    27. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had to say it: 13 is no longer pedo.

    28. Re:Oh the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure hope pedophiles in Brazil can't hack or learn to hack. Holy crap this is bad on so many levels

      I would guess that your alarm is unwarranted. In the poorer parts of Brasil (Para & Maranhao), I regularly met 12 year old girls with children. I even met a lady who was the daughter of a woman who had 4 kids by the age of 14. Pedophilia is a crime and it is wrong, but I don't think that it is the same contextually (post puberty) in the EEUU as it is in Brasil. What is considered underage was just different there. I don't think pedophiles will need some chip if they want a 'child'.

  2. Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Funny

    Doing this with chips is barbaric. We must do this with cameras and biometrics, hopefully also we'll get drones involved somehow. That's the American way!

    1. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doing this with chips is barbaric.

      No, it's British. The American way would be doing it with fries.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be the British way as well.

      Rag on America all you want, but we didn't invent the chip sandwich.

    3. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American way is to put metal detectors and police officers in schools, randomly have drug sniffing dogs, conduct searches without warrants and use whatever material is confiscated (illegal or not) to intimidate children and teenagers.

      Brought to you as an evolution of the "hall pass", where kids can't even go to the bathroom without written authorization.

    4. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      What ever happened to taking role? What kind of incompetent idiots are running schools when they need to chip the kids to keep up with them?

    5. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ever happened to taking role? What kind of incompetent idiots are running schools when they need to chip the kids to keep up with them?

      The same one's that taught you roll vs. role?

    6. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong!

      The American way would have schools looking like prisons. Oh wait. They already do!

    7. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ever happened to taking role? What kind of incompetent idiots are running schools when they need to chip the kids to keep up with them?

      The same one's that taught you roll vs. role?

      Yeah, you've met them too. They taught you ones vs. one's.

    8. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the other guy got his learnin' from the Kaiser, I think.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Sadly my spell checker had no problem with role since it is in fact a legitimate word. Unfortunately it has a different meaning from roll. This is what comes from quickly tapping out a reply when half asleep.

    10. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      You'd be correct except the chips are obviously really for mind controlling an army of brazilian cyborg kids to attack Argentina. I thought that was pretty obvious if you read between the lines :-P

    11. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      "Welcome to England! Would you like some starch with your starch?"

    12. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      Rag on America all you want, but we didn't invent the chip sandwich.

      No, but you did invent cheese in a can, which is one of the main reasons I laugh myself silly when Americans mock British cuisine.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    13. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm an American and I came up with that idea (reinvented on my own) back when I was a kid. If I was hungry and dinner was off a ways I would sometimes fry up some potatoes (though I cut across them so I cut nice circles that were about a 16th of an inch thick instead of the normal french fry wedge) and then stick them between two slices of bread.
      It's not high cuisine but it works well when you are hungry and there's nothing else ready to eat.

    14. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Doing this with chips is barbaric. We must do this with cameras and biometrics, hopefully also we'll get drones involved somehow. That's the American way!

      Ah, no, doing this with chips is merely the affordable way. Overspending the living shit out of everything only to have the poor taxpayer end up (bailing out) the mistakes of the rich while they get richer...now THAT is the American way.

    15. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by EdIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      Look.... as far as cuisine goes.... you both (America and British) are like two ugly fat chicks arguing about who is uglier.

      Americans got Mac'N'Cheese, everything drowned in ketchup, and the nastiest processed food on Earth, .... and ... you Brits got spotted dick, the traditional breakfast with those charcoal briquettes of fried blood, and some of the most bland tasting food of all time. All the more hysterical since you practically invented the Spice trade.

      Anything good in America was imported along with immigrants. Quite frankly, the only uglier chick in the room is Indian cuisine. Not hard to see why they are rail thin peoples.

      Counter-intuitively, you would expect Chinese and Thai people to be fat as fuck, since that is some seriously, seriously tasty food.

      When was the last time you were messed up on a couch with some people all craving British food?

      Now I will give props to the British for their lecherous and lazy gambler that invented the sandwich. One of the best culinary inventions in the last thousand years. The best being, of course, the chocolate covered peanut.

    16. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Look.... as far as cuisine goes.... you both (America and British) are like two ugly fat chicks arguing about who is uglier.

      Yup, but I don't care so long as we win. :P
      And, FWIW, I detest black pudding, but when I'm "messed up on a couch" I do get an odd hankering for a fried egg sarnie. Wouldn't mind one of those now, actually...

      There's some debate over whether or not tikka masala is a British invention but I'll leave that as I don't really care for it (I prefer korma).

      BTW, have you tried spotted dick? (no jokes please, they've all been done to death) It's damned good, though not as good as the unassumingly-named bread and butter pudding. The trick with both is to make the custard properly; not the crummy powdered stuff.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    17. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      The same one's that taught you roll vs. role?

      Muphry strikes again!

    18. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      those charcoal briquettes of fried blood

      Disgusting. Your boudin noir, of course, are a delicacy.

      some of the most bland tasting food of all time.

      Rationing in WW2 (& austerity afterwards) meant spices & other exotic ingredients were in short supply - & unlike your grandmother they couldn't do favours for the Germans to get extras. One generation grew up doing without & the next accepted bland food because they'd never experienced anything else.

      Outside that period, in either direction, you couldn't be more wrong.

      Oh, and find a good Indian restaurant. It'll educate you.

      Anything good in America was imported along with immigrants.

      That doesn't make any sense. See, most of the things you're railing against look like extensions/adaptations of Northern European cuisine to me.

      Or are you saying it was the Cherokees that invented aerosol cheese, hotdogs & pizzas that an Italian wouldn't even use as doormats?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Anything good in America was imported along with immigrants.

      That's a somewhat unreasonable complaint. Apart from a tiny percentage of Native Americans they are all descendants of immigrants. What choice did they have but import what they knew tasted good? It belongs to them just as much as it belongs to their compatriots who did not emigrate. In any case regardless who invented it: there is no shortage of excellent food in the US.

      It's entirely fair to blame them for what they did to beer though. There were plenty of German immigrants who knew how to brew it, if they hadn't destroyed their businesses via the prohibition, they wouldn't have to drink Bud Lite today.

      British food may be terrible, but their cakes rock. They know how to bake - well unless it comes to bread, not sure what happened there... British-Indian food is good, too - don't know what you are complaining about there. I'd say your average Indian restaurant is miles ahead of an average Chinese or Thai restaurant. (Now if you get the food *in* China, or *in* Thailand - that's a different matter.)

    20. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why I have a bookmarks folder for Slashdot. I'm American and I find this (mostly) true and hilarious.

    21. Re:Yeah, this is a job for face recognition CCTV! by EdIII · · Score: 1

      It's not really that unreasonable. When I say American food, I am talking about food that was invented in America. Stuff like the traditional hamburger, hot dog, etc. Immigrants, which includes all of us, did bring recipes with them, but when you go to restaurants like that do they call it American food? Italians still call it an Italian restaurant in America, even when some of the dishes are Americanized.

      There really is not that much that American can claim as its own. Most of the really good stuff came along with immigrants, and is still classified as such.

      No question about the beer. Americans fucked that up plenty. Although I don't drink except on rare occasions, I have tasted the difference between American and German beers. Talk about a difference.

      I have not had a lot of British sweets, but I will take your word for it. The rest of it is terrible. British-Indian food? Never had it.

      Perhaps I lumped all Indian food together. To be fair, there are some subcategories. I think anything from the south sucks ass. All that vegetarian nonsense. Northern provinces like Punjab have some pretty good stuff. Most of what I have tasted is what Americans think Indian food is.. so it may not be accurate.Having been dragged (literally) to quite a few Indian restaurants most of them are not Punjab. It's all stuff that I would not want to qualify as food. I would even have British food before that stuff.

      Miles ahead of Chinese or Thai food? Highly, highly unlikely. Here I am most certainly not talking about Americanized versions of their food either. Traditional Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese, and Laotion food just rocks. I have eaten in China and there is a big difference in the food, even when prepared traditionally in the US.

      I will take Chinese and Laotion food all day long over Punjab Indian food. All of that, of course, is light years ahead of any traditional American fare.

  3. Fuck yes! by owenferguson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like the ideal provocation to strip buck naked and cut some class.

    1. Re:Fuck yes! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      More like "Go over to your friend's house, change, then convince your friend to carry your uniform in his/her backpack."

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Fuck yes! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Johnny, why are you wearing six shirts today?"

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Fuck yes! by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Why has this been modded funny?

  4. I will reiterate.... by wanzeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Technology CANNOT solve social problems. It can only hide symptoms.

    1. Re:I will reiterate.... by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It can SHOW the symptoms. Seriously every school in the world already does this kind of checking. A roll call at the start of the class is the normal way.

      Throughout all of my highschool I've been wondering why we don't do something more productive with technology to automate this waste of the first 5 minutes of every class and incorporate all other services as well such as library loans with technology such as RFID.

      To be perfectly clear GPS tracking of students off school property is completely unacceptable, but this is not the case. This looks like a basic system to see who is in the class. An automated roll call. It's not solving anything, it's simply automating what we do already.

    2. Re:I will reiterate.... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Technology CANNOT solve social problems.

      Why not?

      Technology has solved lots of my social problems. I used to have trouble locating family and friends at the mall. Now we all have cellphones, so the problem is solved.

      Technology cannot solve all social problems, but it can certainly solve some of them.

    3. Re:I will reiterate.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. You and your friends at the mall having trouble finding one another isn't a social problem, anymore than my queue of tasks is a social problem. Its an organizational problem. Technology is pretty good at solving that type of problem. Social problems involve victimizing behaviors, addictions, abuses, power balances ..

    4. Re:I will reiterate.... by green1 · · Score: 1

      How is a situation in which you count uniforms instead of students an improvement in this area? do you really think the students are too dumb to figure out that they don't need to be present in class, they only have to make sure their chip is? Roll call is much more accurate, much harder to fake, and has the added benefit of being cheap. Not to mention the fact that after about day 5 of the semester it doesn't take any time as the teacher just does a cursory glance around to see which desks aren't occupied and they already know the students well enough to know who is missing by then. I'm all for technology solving problems, but only if it is at least as good as the existing system. until then you would be irresponsible to use it in a real life application like this.

    5. Re:I will reiterate.... by ne0n · · Score: 1

      True that. It's a matter of minutes from deployment until kids invent workarounds.

      If chipment of kids were a norm back in my high school days I'd have ensured that my chip would somehow end up in the neighbour's uniform.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    6. Re:I will reiterate.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not assign seats for each class and just put sensors in the chairs. At the start of class, they check to see if there's a body in them and record attendance. If someone's missing it alerts the instructor who can do a manual check and verify the results. Accomplishes the same thing but without the need to put a tracking device on a person. If we're going to solve a problem with technology, lets at least do it intelligently.

    7. Re:I will reiterate.... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      It can SHOW the symptoms. Seriously every school in the world already does this kind of checking. A roll call at the start of the class is the normal way.

      Throughout all of my highschool I've been wondering why we don't do something more productive with technology to automate this waste of the first 5 minutes of every class and incorporate all other services as well such as library loans with technology such as RFID.

      To be perfectly clear GPS tracking of students off school property is completely unacceptable, but this is not the case. This looks like a basic system to see who is in the class. An automated roll call. It's not solving anything, it's simply automating what we do already.

      And I would completely agree with you, except that the sales guy behind you who's already pressing palms with the local Government and law enforcement doesn't seem to think that school is the only application...and yes, that IS the natural progression of such activity. It only starts with good intentions.

    8. Re:I will reiterate.... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Your example is not a social problem.

      Tardiness can be a social problem, homelessness and joblessness can be social problems, illiteracy can be a social problem. Intellectual property is a social problem, a huge social problem.

      Assisting you in finding your peeps or the nearest place to get a hamburger is not solving a social problem.

    9. Re:I will reiterate.... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      a roll call is a local track that builds relations with students and teacher. An automated system teaches kids that pervasive electronic surveillance is acceptable for even trivial things like being across a certain line before a bell rings. this is not the message schools should send.

      Roll call itself is a waste.. if the kid's not in class, the teacher should recognize that in his grade book immediately and take action. School doesn't need to be run like a prison.

    10. Re:I will reiterate.... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      locating your family in a mall is not a social problem.. it is a tactical one.

    11. Re:I will reiterate.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > why we don't do something more productive with technology to automate
      > > this waste of the first 5 minutes of every class [...] such as RFID

      > How is a situation in which you count uniforms instead of students an improvement in this area?

      Its not. In fact, its actually a slight loss in functionality (unless doing facial recognition with stereo cameras). But its good enough and replaces a tedious manual process. Its like a teachers aide taking attendance before the teacher walks into the room. Imagine, at the start of every class, the teacher would glance around, acknowledge the 'present/absent' count on his console, with the option to redo the roll-call manually if something seemed awry.

      Punch cards replaced a similar manual 'employee-present' count by a clerk or foreman during the industrial revolution.
        http://www.small-business-plan-to-profit.com/employee-performance.html

    12. Re:I will reiterate.... by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Technology CANNOT solve social problems.

      Ever heard of a dildo?

      (Seen on /. eons ago: )

  5. American parents will lap this up by Gothmolly · · Score: 2

    It promises security and at the same time obviates the need for the parents to be responsible - the perfect American dream.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:American parents will lap this up by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Just go the extra step and pay the Cool Kid to wear these, to make them The Thing to wear, so that anyone resisting gets socially outcast for a month.

      (/Bitter)

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    2. Re:American parents will lap this up by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      It can't be helped. Child molesters lurk around every corner, and what if a kid skips class? That would be the end of the world as we know it! Therefore, we need to spy on them at all times and track them. That way they'll get used to the idea of being tracked and they'll accept government surveillance when they get older.

      Grand slam!

  6. Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing short of evil in the guise of good. Sure it sounds like a good idea, "It's for the Children!" but I think we all know this is bad. Anyone here think this is a good thing?

    1. Re:Evil by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Explain exactly how is this "evil" (and remember this is a simple RFID tag, not a GPS locator).

    2. Re:Evil by mcavic · · Score: 1

      It is pretty Orwellian, but I actually do think it's a good idea. I assume it's RFID rather than GPS, which means all they're doing is registering you at the front door. And in addition to skipping classes, you have to think about kids getting abducted while walking to school or waiting for the bus.

    3. Re:Evil by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Depends on your goal. For those that have a goal of total control of their population, its a good thing. AND they have support of parents, so the children will grow up thinking this is normal.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain exactly how is this "evil" (and remember this is a simple RFID tag, not a GPS locator).

      Guys you can read a RFID tag at 150 feet if not more, i would say maybe up 1 mile with of the shelf tech, and with military tech maybe up to 10 miles and space.is only 7 miles up, so the could scan you from orbit
      also your forgeting that every store and warehouse, post office/UPS/fedex van and WIFI RFID reader anyone with ipadd rfid reaer could scan you on way home from school, plus walmarts been doing this for over 10 years now.

    5. Re:Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 to 150 feet means if the put scaners in every door or the middle of school, they scan the whole school at any one time
      i dont thing you guys get this, it a chip with your name on send that info out over a microwave radio, they know were everyone is at all times, there powers not on the hardware side but the software side of the clients school computers, the chips themself only send ID number like SSN but linked to the right DATABASE could be use to learn everything about you, by datamining like at walmart they know how much money you have and everything you buy, how much your clothing worth, how much on your Credit cards, background check, credit check(how much money your worth) and do this stuff auto-matticaly, get arrested over the weekend then next they u know the there sending you to office about that etc

      if that not clear to you dicks that dont get why people knowing were u are at is bad thing,
      my new local police station just put RFID tags locks on the door, to the building and to armory, etc, that bad thing because anyone with $100 can copy RFID tags
      so i can copy captian dickwad, spoof his ID number, then walk into the armory take some guns later he get arestted by the FBI for shooting people and selling guns, also if every officer has TAG then using the WIFI rfid tags i could scan all the cops cars all over town, on my home computer has the cops patrol base any readers making a pattern map of were they just were at, like batman did on dark knight with cell phones, every RFID tags act like mini radio or cell phone, when hit with microwaves, that why there so use full there selfreporting to any micropulses that charge there system

    6. Re:Evil by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Reading a small passive RFID tag from 150 feet? [citation needed]

      also your forgeting that every store and warehouse, post office/UPS/fedex van and WIFI RFID reader anyone with ipadd rfid reaer could scan you on way home from school, plus walmarts been doing this for over 10 years now.

      Yeah, and they can also recognize the child by looking at his/her face. Oh, the horror! We must force them to use burkas!

    7. Re:Evil by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      so i can copy captian dickwad, spoof his ID number

      How would you copy RFID chips that employ ciphers, like the RFID chips in passports?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    8. Re:Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would they pay extra vor ciphers when the cops and banks would not?
      on taptopay visa cards have ciphers

    9. Re:Evil by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      why would they pay extra vor ciphers when the cops and banks would not?

      You don't pay extra, it's standard as part of RFID chips.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  7. How would this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't kids just work out that they could get one student to carry other students uniforms around in a bag? What ever happened to a good ol' roll call?

    1. Re:How would this work? by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Student's Friend: "Susie had to miss class for a [theatre/sports/music/etc] [practice/trip/performance/game/etc] today, Teacher." Roll call fooled.

    2. Re:How would this work? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible system, then. Here the teacher always marks the absence, regardless of the reasons, and then the parent/legal guardian can justify it later.

  8. Freedom's pining for the fjords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. will do wonders for education by keeboo · · Score: 1

    Those kids will learn very well that

    Being monitored: restrict your behavior.
    Absence of monitoring: you are free, do whatever you like.

    Those will be good citizens, as long as you don't forget to keep them leashed all the time.

  10. Error rate? by tragedy · · Score: 2

    I'm assuming this is just an rfid system and not something more elaborate. The question becomes what happens to students who are reported absent by malfunctioning or poorly set up equipment and incorrect information in databases?. In an ideal world, this wouldn't be a problem since the student would be able to verify their presence some other way, then the problem would be conscientiously addressed and corrected. This is the real world, however. In the real world, school administrators tend to be authoritarians and extremely blunt thinkers. The prevalence of ill-thought out "zero tolerance" policies in the area of education makes this perfectly clear. Students identified as absent by this system probably won't be given a chance to prove their innocence and may stand a good chance of being punished more harshly if they try.

    1. Re:Error rate? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2

      Zero tolerance means zero responsibility, and they are made by smart people to avoid these kinds of problems.

      Any time an administrator has to make a decision that may affect a student, they open themselves up to all kinds of trouble. Even if you win, a parent filing a lawsuit is at best a distraction and at worst a money drain. And just having a parent waging war, making noise at PTA meetings, or whatever they can think of to harass the administrator, it can become quite the pain. Usually, some dispute with a parent leads to this type of policy, to prevent it happening again. If it happens at one school, you can bet another school will at least consider trying to avoid the same thing.

      I'm not even going to attempt to point out what's wrong with the rest of this, other than leave a quote from the article here.

      After a student skips classes three times parents will be asked to explain the absences.

    2. Re:Error rate? by dlp211 · · Score: 1

      Easy fix, teachers take attendance still, only oddities need to be investigated; ie. student wasn't absent but isn't in class, check physical log and determine if it is a defective tag.

    3. Re:Error rate? by green1 · · Score: 1

      If the teacher is still taking attendence, then what is gained from adding the RFID? This sounds like a really expensive, and not very accurate "fix" to a problem that was solved cheaply and more accurately centuries ago.

    4. Re:Error rate? by mattventura · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it become a bit redundant? If you want to tell parents about absences, just look at the teachers' attendance and look at who was missing. Seems like too much cost for little benefit over what is currently done.

    5. Re:Error rate? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Zero tolerance means zero responsibility, and they are made by smart people to avoid these kinds of problems.

      I pretty much agree with that except for the part about them being made by smart people. You don't have to be smart to apply the CYA principle, you just have to be exercising standard human moral cowardice. That's not to say that a smart person can't decide on a zero-tolerance policy, but they're very frequently put in place by committees of people who truly don't understand what the consequences will be.

  11. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why people think this big-brother-ish... It's not like they've just decided to take attendance starting with this new system. This just means the teachers don't have to do it by hand and waste class time to do so.

  12. PoppyCock by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Declaring that this is bad is a joke. These are tags in the uniforms of CHILDREN. It is as orwellian as putting RFID in my dogs. I would love to know if my teens cut school. And I am just fine with using a tag in their clothes.

    Now, if they want to do this to an adult, or forced embed it in a human, that is a DIFFERENT issue.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the great things about living in the UK. Children actually have rights.

    2. Re:PoppyCock by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah yes, the conservative mentality: children are pets of their adult owners.

    3. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the great things about living in the UK. Children actually have rights.

      My children have the right to do what i tell them to do.

    4. Re:PoppyCock by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now, if they want to do this to an adult, or forced embed it in a human, that is a DIFFERENT issue.

      If you had always been tagged from the time you were a small child, and had all your life to get used to the idea, would you still think so?

      That's the danger.

      It's early conditioning (indoctrination) for a future time when it will be easier to justify (excuse) doing this to adults. Right now lots of adults feel the way you do about tagging or chipping adults. That makes it politically difficult or impossible to do that right now. That's about the only thing stopping it because politics is full of authoritarian types who would love to do it.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    5. Re:PoppyCock by kenh · · Score: 1

      And the liberal mentality is they are the wards of the state - the state will provide all their needs, in a manner the state finds appropriate.

      Whee! It's fun to make up positions for other people, I can see why you do that trepidity...

      --
      Ken
    6. Re:PoppyCock by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they don't have the right of skipping classes. I don't see what rights does this violate that a guy manually logging their names to paper wouldn't.

      This thread seems filled by Luddites, "uh, it's dangerous because it's a CHIP!!1!".

    7. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more likely they'll see that as being treated like a child the same way adults view curfews.

    8. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think many responsible parents don't want their children to be tracked *everywhere* they go. That is what this system is providing the opportunity for. There's nothing wrong with traditional roll call and computer scanning. Many schools in my local area have systems in place which send text messages if a child is not at roll call.

    9. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We hippies have matured. Our children have to be at least 16 before they can drink and smoke pot with us.

    10. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the conservative mentality: children are pets of their adult owners.

      Liberals have kids by accident because they fail to use birth control. I mean if you're a responsible person who thinks of those things you wouldn't be a liberal.

      Conservatives have mostly planned kids as extensions of their own vanity. That's why the kids are little more than property sort of like a car they have to wash twice a day.

      Couldn't tell you which one's worse.

    11. Re:PoppyCock by sixtyeight · · Score: 2

      These are tags in the uniforms of CHILDREN. It is as orwellian as putting RFID in my dogs.

      I think the fine point here is, it's as Orwellian as who putting RFID in your dogs?

      The police? Animal Control? A neighbor? The Chinese restaurant down the street?

      They're your dogs, and legally children (in the U.S., anyway) are considered the property of parents until the age of majority. But these are mandated uniforms. Other parents may not want their children tagged, and their choice doesn't seem to matter quite so much. I would think this would be opt-in so that it would. Either way, the child's choice doesn't enter into it which is par for the course. It'll all come out in therapy twenty years down the line, and that's only if the kids don't start clipping the RFIDs off their uniforms anyway.

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
    12. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh... Well, I didn't know that. Yeah, at 16 they're perfectly ready to party, so disregard my comments. But back when it was 15 it was a little irresponsible.

    13. Re:PoppyCock by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It's and RFID tag, it doesn't "track them everywhere they go", it just records the timestamp of when they go through the reader.

    14. Re:PoppyCock by causality · · Score: 1

      I think it's more likely they'll see that as being treated like a child the same way adults view curfews.

      That sounds at first glance like a good point so I'll explain why it won't be that way.

      Curfews can't so easily be excused by saying "well if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about from all this monitoring and tracking". Curfews can't so easily be used to track down and catch a murderer or rapist or other violent criminal, which really appeals to cowards who surrender their liberty and privacy for a promise of security.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    15. Re:PoppyCock by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      Treat children like subhumans and that's exactly what you'll get. I have no doubt that accepting this type of thing will just instill a belief in them that surveillance is okay.

    16. Re:PoppyCock by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      ahem.

      pets are usually far better behaved.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    17. Re:PoppyCock by Cazekiel · · Score: 1

      It is as orwellian as putting RFID in my dogs. Your dog will run into traffic, run away in general or get stolen from your yard. A preteen/teenager, doing wrong, can learn from their own mistakes should they skip school; learning process and general roll call, do you speak it?

      Now, if they want to do this to an adult, or forced embed it in a human, that is a DIFFERENT issue. Kids are people too, remember, and the more we try to control them, the more creative they're going to get with their ways of getting out of things--and the angrier and more resentful they're going to be about how society/their parents treat them, to boot. And please, I'd say there are more of these supposed "adults" that need a chip on 'em than schoolkids that play hooky every now and again. If I have the choice between surgically implanting a chip into a serial drunk driver/pedophile/etc.'s brain stem and slipping the device in a kid's pocket, I'd go with the former.

      --
      You want to know how to help your kids? LEAVE THEM THE F*&K ALONE. --George Carlin
    18. Re:PoppyCock by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Should I get to choose whether my child can reply to a roll call or not? If not, how is this different?

      For fucks sake, people, it's a damn RFID tag, not a GPS embedded under their skin.

    19. Re:PoppyCock by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      luddites, huh?

      maybe us 'luddites' can see the creeping anti-freedom that you seem so smugly unaware of.

      sure, embrace any new idea and don't question where it will go. sure! what harm could it do?

      don't bother to think too long. your favorite tv show is on!!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    20. Re:PoppyCock by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Until you can explain exactly how is this "anti-freedom", you're nothing but Luddites.

      Slippery slope is a fallacy. Accepting something harmless like this doesn't force you to accept actual rights-violating systems.

      Oh, and I don't watch TV.

    21. Re:PoppyCock by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Now, if they want to do this to an adult, or forced embed it in a human, that is a DIFFERENT issue.

      If you had always been tagged from the time you were a small child, and had all your life to get used to the idea, would you still think so?

      That's the danger.

       

      I spent 12 years of being forced to eat school cafeteria meals with no chance to go off-campus for lunch.

      When I started college, I took full advantage of the freedom to eat fast food of my own choosing whenver I could afford it despite the fact that I had a "free" on-campus meal plan.

      Just because someone accepts something in grade school doesn't mean that they won't appreciate giving it up after they are out of school.

    22. Re:PoppyCock by causality · · Score: 1

      Treat children like subhumans and that's exactly what you'll get. I have no doubt that accepting this type of thing will just instill a belief in them that surveillance is okay.

      I believe that's what it is intended to do. For just that reason they're keeping it fairly tame and benign.

      Anyone who thinks it will stay that way is a fool. It would be like expecting a business not to look for new markets when it is in their nature to do so.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    23. Re:PoppyCock by sixtyeight · · Score: 1

      Should I get to choose whether my child can reply to a roll call or not?

      I love that question! If the State is going to make public education mandatory, perhaps there should be a better assurance that the schools haven't become repurposed to merely desensitize them to being oppressed and intimately micromanaged, in preparation for their adult years as citizens. So they will tolerate anything as voters, consumers and employees.

      And this seems like a good issue to raise the question. Just as the introduction of backscatter scanners would have been the obvious point at which to raise the question of whether Homeland Security was really Constitutional.

      [p]eople, it's a damn RFID tag, not a GPS embedded under their skin.

      In this instance, how is it any different?

      The same goes for mandatory drug-tests at work when they get older. Perhaps the employer would also like to get some bloodwork done, to make sure you're not going to keel over from something you're genetically-predisposed to in a few years. But let's not assess whether, as an employee, you're at least as entitled to independent third-party review of white collar crime within the management.

      Our society - I don't know about Brazil's - has been getting increasingly more one-sided in disfavor of the individual. The approach in TFA doesn't seem like another likely maneuver towards that to you?

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
    24. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Only children are being affected here, not adults, so the only moral issues concern parental consent. Children have nothing like the rights and responsibilities of adults and are much closer to the level of pets.

      Related: I've long been pushing for doing scientific testing on children in situations where animals just won't do. Decent parents would probably never consent but there are few decent parents in this world. Also, there are many orphans who I assume are owned by the state or something.

    25. Re:PoppyCock by icebraining · · Score: 1

      In this instance, how is it any different?

      Uh, one thing is tracking them everywhere they go, another is just logging the timestamps of when they go through the entrace door. There's a big difference.

      The same goes for mandatory drug-tests at work when they get older. Perhaps the employer would also like to get some bloodwork done, to make sure you're not going to keel over from something you're genetically-predisposed to in a few years.

      Sorry, but I don't see how is mandatory drug-tests - an obvious and disgusting privacy violation - in any way similar to this.

      Our society - I don't know about Brazil's - has been getting increasingly more one-sided in disfavor of the individual. The approach in TFA doesn't seem like another likely maneuver towards that to you?

      Well, I'm not part of "your society" either, but no, I don't see how is this a maneuver towards that, and apparently no one here has been able to explain it either.

    26. Re:PoppyCock by causality · · Score: 2

      Just because someone accepts something in grade school doesn't mean that they won't appreciate giving it up after they are out of school.

      Likewise, just because you can break free from your early influence and training, and question it, and ultimately reject it, does not mean that the average person has enough individuality to do so.

      That's a very sad and tragic thing to say. I wish it weren't so. But in this way, you are somewhat exceptional.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    27. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slippery slope is a fallacy.

      It's not always a fallacy. I'd say suggesting that teaching people that surveillance is okay from an early age will probably make them accept it later in life is not so outrageous.

    28. Re:PoppyCock by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      This appears to be a false dilemma...

      Either let them do whatever they please, or treat them like slaves.

    29. Re:PoppyCock by artor3 · · Score: 1

      I spent my entire childhood not being allowed to drive or drink or own my own place, and now I do all those things.

      By your logic, we shouldn't require kids to go to school at all, because it conditions them to follow rules. While such a notion makes for a great Calvin & Hobbes cartoon, in real life children are incapable of fully grasping the consequences of their actions, and they need people to watch over them.

    30. Re:PoppyCock by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Recording the time at which the child has entered and left the school is no more "surveillance" than doing a roll call, so nothing in that regard changes with this.

    31. Re:PoppyCock by ne0n · · Score: 1

      Pro tip: only a shitty parent would think of chipping their kid. The burden of teaching a kid doesn't belong exclusively in the domain of others.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    32. Re:PoppyCock by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      And an RFID reader is some kind of secret technology that only the government have, and is only available for use in public schools* right?

      Such a tag lets everybody track the children. Or better, it would let, if the children don't beat the system too fast to create any kind of infrastructure, as will probably happen.

      * LOL. Have you ever see a brazilian public school? Yeah, they are nice and everything, but the tought of a secret piece of technology restricted to it is funny.

    33. Re:PoppyCock by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      legally children (in the U.S., anyway) are considered the property of parents

      Are you sure that is right? That is wrong on so many levels.

    34. Re:PoppyCock by sixtyeight · · Score: 1

      It's not common knowledge, but yes. Looked it up years ago but no longer have the cites for it.

      Has to do with the federal government no longer acting within the Constitution, and therefore being in a corporate capacity. Therefore, everything is contractually-based. Slightly worse, the parents are merely the holders in due course. By the time it's reached the age of majority it's been the subject of a number of contracts from Certified Federal Citizenship (the "STATE OF [WHATEVER]"s are all federal), federal income tax benefits, public education benefits, etc. By accepting benefits, privileges and considerations, the parents are considered to have signed it over to the federal government in a compelled performance contract. Perhaps a good indicator of this are the municipal codes for practically anywhere in the U.S.: they only apply to "persons" which - in law, not English - refers to the subject of a contractual obligation. That's right, municipal codes don't apply to actual people, but only pull the strings of a contractual relationship.

      Mind you, the contract isn't valid law. It's unconscionable (in the original sense of the legal term), it's outside the Constitution, and we've never given our representatives the authority to make those kinds of contracts (particularly on time we paid for). But it's the fictive argument on which they base their position. To obfuscate it, ranks of attorneys are actually officers of the court, systematically convoluting the legal definitions over generations. To sort out what they've been up do, you'd actually need to study them. I have.

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
    35. Re:PoppyCock by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Passive RFID tags like those only have a range of a meter (3.3 feet) or so. If you're that close to them, you could just use face tracking if you really wanted to track them. Besides, it doesn't actually track children, only their school uniforms, which children don't tend to use outside of school or when traveling to and from it.

      All in all, I frankly don't see the problem. If a parent is really concerned, the kid can just take the school uniform after leaving school. Otherwise, he's probably already broadcasting a bluetooth MAC address and name from their mobile phone, which is much easier to track anyway.

    36. Re:PoppyCock by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      So, underage kids in the UK have the right to skip school and not have parents know about it?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    37. Re:PoppyCock by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      Depending on where I have worked, I had badges that I had to wand in as I entered and excited. So, work knows when I come and go. It has been this way for 30+ years.

      How is this any more intrusive other than it is about parents tracking their underage kids?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    38. Re:PoppyCock by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Pets? No. They are my responsibility, which is not much different than my pets. I make certain that my pets do not attack others. Likewise, since the law REQUIRES that my children attend school, it is my RESPONSIBILITY to get them there, with exceptions allowed (sickness, weather, etc).
      Finally, as a parent, I want to make my children capable of having a happy and fullfilling life. Do you think that without an education they can do that? Seriously?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    39. Re:PoppyCock by sixtyeight · · Score: 1

      In this instance, how is it any different?

      Uh, one thing is tracking them everywhere they go, another is just logging the timestamps of when they go through the entrace door. There's a big difference.

      There is, unless the one is just the thin end of the wedge to the other. And counter to the collective supposition, it typically is.

      The same goes for mandatory drug-tests at work when they get older. Perhaps the employer would also like to get some bloodwork done, to make sure you're not going to keel over from something you're genetically-predisposed to in a few years.

      Sorry, but I don't see how is mandatory drug-tests - an obvious and disgusting privacy violation - in any way similar to this.

      Acceptance happens in drips and drabs. In the U.S., that sort of erosion of rights has been happening for over 200 years. So we must be very cautious when societal modifications like this start happening. Even if it's legit in Brazil, another country is likely to pick it up and adopt it with other directions in mind. Today, it's roll-call. In a decade or two, GPS for truancy. By then, ease-of-use would enable politicians and corporations to come up with all kinds of reasons why having it on you at all times would be so beneficial for many of your needs, nobody would seriously question it. From there, an identity-theft epidemic would justify chipping adults.

      Our society - I don't know about Brazil's - has been getting increasingly more one-sided in disfavor of the individual. The approach in TFA doesn't seem like another likely maneuver towards that to you?

      Well, I'm not part of "your society" either, but no, I don't see how is this a maneuver towards that, and apparently no one here has been able to explain it either.

      Part of it has to do with the increasing commoditization of people. Going through an airport scanner is on par with being on the conveyor belt at a grocery store checkout counter. The mandatory drug tests from an employer we've discussed. And this. Part of it has to do with the instilling of a psychology of being a product, which all of these things do. I'm not sure I can explain it any better, and maybe it's just a human thing rather than something that can be effectively pinned down - much of the society I live in attempts to swat it out of their conscious perception, and so I don't have the terminology to convey it with precision. It's hardly ever used.

      The other part has to do with the ongoing trends of how society in the U.S. is being terraformed. When it becomes a demonstrable pattern, proof is needed to demonstrate how this isn't - or wouldn't be - a part of it. At the moment, that appears to be only because it's happening in Brazil rather than the U.S.. Because it could so easily happen here, as part of an ongoing trend, it sets off mental alerts for people. If we had a functional government that wasn't always trying to do this - and often succeeding quite well - it probably wouldn't have the same connotations for people. The context would be quite different, and most people would read about it with nary a blip set off on their mental radars.

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
    40. Re:PoppyCock by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Just because someone accepts something in grade school doesn't mean that they won't appreciate giving it up after they are out of school.

      Likewise, just because you can break free from your early influence and training, and question it, and ultimately reject it, does not mean that the average person has enough individuality to do so.

      That's a very sad and tragic thing to say. I wish it weren't so. But in this way, you are somewhat exceptional.

      You are joking, right? You're saying that the average 18 year old doesn't have the capacity to break free from 12 years of school and accepts the same lifestyle and restrictions that he lived under while in school? Do you *know* any 18 year olds?

    41. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This hyper-competent government that you assume is capable (or even interested) in creating a real-life 1984 type environment does not, according too all the evidence available to us, exist.

    42. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Children are the wards of their adult parents. It's a lot of responsibility and work and you know what? You're right, fuck that let's just let those little bastards run wild! Why would I give a shit where my kid is, fuck it - let him go to some condemned hotel and smoke crack!

      Parenting is indeed a lot of responsibility. You are responsible for teaching your children to make the right decisions. If you have to force them to go to class and verify that they are indeed going in order to prevent them from skipping, you've already failed.

      It's your responsibility to make them understand the importance of school. It's your responsibility to make them them understand the consequences of their actions if they were to choose to run wild, go to condemned hotels, and smoke crack. The difference between good parents and crappy parents is that good parents have kids that make the right choices while the bad parents are the one who have to constantly keep such a close tab on them that the moment they turn away, their kids do something stupid.

    43. Re:PoppyCock by Shompol · · Score: 1

      Now, if they want to do this to an adult, or forced embed it in a human, that is a DIFFERENT issue.

      Children will grow up to become adults sooner than you think. And by that time they will not object being tagged with an RFID chip on a daily basis because YOU told them it is OK. There is a distinction between children and pets and the line should not be crossed.

    44. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's your responsibility to make them understand the importance of school.

      No. It's your responsible to make them understand the perceived importance of education. School does not equal education, and there are some that believe that the public education system is currently awful.

    45. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most kids are easily influenced. If surveillance becomes prevalent in their lives, they will more than likely accept it. Your example is poor because that isn't exactly rammed down people's throats under the guise of stopping criminals and keeping innocents safe. Jam that nonsense into people's heads enough from a very young age and they may very well end up believing it.

      Drinking and driving are relatively normal things. In any case, not many would claim they're absolutely evil activities. But if you claim that surveillance will keep people safe and stop all those nasty murderers, rapists, and terrorists? And you tell this to people while they're growing up? I suspect the results would be far different than the results in your out of place examples.

      in real life children are incapable of fully grasping the consequences of their actions, and they need people to watch over them.

      What they don't need is overprotective imbeciles constantly hovering over them to make sure they don't get so much as a scratch on their precious little bodies. They don't need to hear that child molesters lurk behind every corner.

    46. Re:PoppyCock by jsternberg · · Score: 1

      Driving, drinking, and owning your own place are different. Each one of those actions was accepted when I reached the "appropriate" age. I was actively encouraged to do each one of them by other people.

      I drank underage in college, just like a lot of other people. I knew people who refused to drink until they reached 21 though, just because the state had told them drinking before then was not allowed.

      If you never tell the kids that being monitored like a dog is wrong, there will be people who don't question it and allow it to become the norm. These are the same kids who are likely already following the rules (and hence, the ones you wouldn't have to worry about).

    47. Re:PoppyCock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a very subtle difference there though.. You gain the right to drive, the right to drink, and independence when you come of a certain age because there are laws that say "You cannot do drink until age X, drive until age Y, divorce your parents/live independently until age Z". There are no laws out there that say "You cannot live RFIDless until age B.". Look at New York and their DNA sampling for misdemeanors.. that shit got passed because our founding fathers didn't explicitly state what liberty and freedoms were, because they didn't know in what ways our liberty and freedoms could be violated. Our founding fathers trusted us with being able to recognize when they were being breached. When things aren't explicitly stated, it's easy for people to get away with slowly pushing the limits and introducing laws that stomp on those freedoms. It's Orwellian-creep at its worst when we rationalize the conditioning of our children to oversight by a "higher authority".

    48. Re:PoppyCock by crakbone · · Score: 1

      Better to track a phone. Kids trade clothes all the time. As well a smart ones will start pulling the rfid and paying a student to wear them to class. I however have never seen a child without their phone unless it was stolen or broken.

    49. Re:PoppyCock by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      No one said that it exists. At least not right now. But what do you think would happen if we just give corruptible, fallible humans unlimited power? Do you really trust the government enough to do that? I'm not saying that's what we're doing, but the government does not always have the best of intentions.

      1984 is a warning. People are warning you not to give the government too much power. It might not turn into a 1984-style government if you do, but I suspect you wouldn't like the results all the same.

      And they don't have to be competent to be corrupt.

  13. just put them in the microwave by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    that will kill them

    1. Re:just put them in the microwave by Gonoff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is probably illegal in Brazil. Even if it is legal to do that to the kids, their parents might object.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    2. Re:just put them in the microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You owe me a new keyboard.

    3. Re:just put them in the microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pedophiles a few threads up? Child murder by microwave?

      Is this SlashDOT or SlashERMOVIE?

    4. Re:just put them in the microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      So it has come to this...

    5. Re:just put them in the microwave by smi.james.th · · Score: 2

      TFA says the following:

      The T-shirts, can be washed and ironed without damaging the chips, Moraes said adding that the chips have a "security system that makes tampering virtually impossible."

      A microwave probably would destroy the chips, as would any strong enough EM source, but they're used to monitor whether a child is entering or leaving the school. So in other words, if the chip is dead, even if the child is in class, the system wouldn't have registered him because of lack of chip and the parents would get a snotty text message.

      FWIW, I'd probably try and destroy it as well though. Just to show how much I loved it.

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    6. Re:just put them in the microwave by synthespian · · Score: 1

      I didn't know microwave destroyed chips. You mean, if you microwave a pen drive, it's gone? That would make so many office people vulnerable...

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    7. Re:just put them in the microwave by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      I must admit, I've never tried, but based on everything I know about electromagnetism, it probably will...

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    8. Re:just put them in the microwave by bipbop · · Score: 1

      Not that the experiment really needs to be done, but if you look, there's several videos on Youtube of people microwaving thumbdrives.

    9. Re:just put them in the microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not live in Brazil, but yes - I most certainly would object and disable the chip. I want my children to know that I'm on their side, not against them.

    10. Re:just put them in the microwave by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1

      that will kill them

      The pedophiles? Yeah, I can get behind that. But castrate them before we spew them all over the inside of the microwave...

      --
      When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
    11. Re:just put them in the microwave by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You know a kid that really minds whether their parents object to something if they think they can get away with doing it anyway?

      Let alone a kid that cares about doing something illegal? Hint: Even the law doesn't.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:just put them in the microwave by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If it's illegal to disable the chip, show your child how to do it themselves.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Get used to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The actions those kids take when not in class could have a harmful and costly impact on others (vandalism, illegal drug use causing health problems that must then be paid for, a lack of education resulting in more stupid grown-ups that can't hold a job and drag on the economy, etc.). In addition, plenty of parents want their kids to go to school because it keeps them safe and is ultimately good for them.

    So, there are direct incentives to make sure the kids go to school. Those incentives are strong enough that people will eventually give over to them, and embrace technologies that give them easy, cheap, and effective ways of enforcing this behavior.

    However....

    This doesn't just apply to kids, it applies to everyone. The actions any person takes impacts one's neighbors, and as such everyone has direct incentives to encircle everyone else in systems of control. This isn't a matter of "them" wanting to take "our" freedoms away. It is am matter of "us" wanting to make sure "they" don't do things that have a negative impact on "us." This principle is universal.

    The desire for freedom will always be in conflict with the desire to limit the freedom of one's neighbors...and eventually the desire to protect one's self and one's own will always win out over the desire to protect the freedoms of one's neighbors.

    Just watch, you will see.

    1. Re:Get used to it by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The actions those kids take when not in class could have a harmful and costly impact on others (vandalism, illegal drug use causing health problems that must then be paid for, a lack of education resulting in more stupid grown-ups that can't hold a job and drag on the economy, etc.). In addition, plenty of parents want their kids to go to school because it keeps them safe and is ultimately good for them.

      I guess you didn't take into account the psychological harm from obsessive, oppressive, non-stop surveillance into every aspect of life.. your statement here is also quite black and white.. school is not pure 'good' or pure 'bad', nor does cutting a class equate to 'vandalism' or drug use (which is also not pure 'good' or pure 'bad.')

      This doesn't just apply to kids, it applies to everyone. The actions any person takes impacts one's neighbors, and as such everyone has direct incentives to encircle everyone else in systems of control. This isn't a matter of "them" wanting to take "our" freedoms away. It is am matter of "us" wanting to make sure "they" don't do things that have a negative impact on "us." This principle is universal.

      and this is the attitude that will ensure we do live out that dystopia of infinite control of others = infinite freedom for the individual. is that really what you want?

    2. Re:Get used to it by mattventura · · Score: 2

      It sounds like it's just automated attendance. Your RFID in your shirt gets scanned at the door. No different than a teacher taking attendance the old-fashioned way. A lot of schools call the parents if their student is marked absent, so it's no different than that.

    3. Re:Get used to it by GmExtremacy · · Score: 2

      The actions those kids take when not in class could have a harmful and costly impact on others

      Right. Just like you could be a murderer. But I'd prefer not to assume guilt or restrict actions based on what could happen.

      They might want them to be in school, but I don't see that as a reason to be overly paranoia about it. It's not the end of the world if they skip class a few times.

      and is ultimately good for them.

      That would really depend on what you think of the current public educational system.

    4. Re:Get used to it by green1 · · Score: 1

      Except that you couldn't fake attendence in the classroom (how long until the kids figure out where the chip is, how to remove it, and have their friends cover for them by carrying the chip to class?) and you couldn't be tracked by strangers. I love technology when it solves an existing problem, but when the existing solution is better than the technological replacement in almost every way, then it should be kept until the technology can catch up.

    5. Re:Get used to it by YoungSaint · · Score: 1

      Right because everytime I skipped class it was for the sole purpose of shooting some heroin, snorting some crack, and spray-painting buildings. I would make a guess that most of the kids just go to the mall, or whatever the local hangout happens to be. Hell, even kids just need to take a day off now and then.

    6. Re:Get used to it by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 2

      The chips are placed underneath each school's coat-of-arms or on one of the sleeves below a phrase that says: "Education does not transform the world. Education changes people and people transform the world."

      Well, challenge one done, location of the chips

      Challenge two:
      Moraes said adding that the chips have a "security system that makes tampering virtually impossible."

      Challenge accepted! This is going to be LEGEND----- wait for it---- DARY!!! (-- Barney)

    7. Re:Get used to it by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I just saw The Hunger Games. You fit in perfectly with the antagonists in that movie....

    8. Re:Get used to it by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      actually, it's quite different. one is a local track driven by relationship between teacher and student, the other, part of a database that becomes a permanent record and sets misguided expectations of the future.. the real harm is that it teaches the kids...err politicians/economic leaders of tomorrow that computer programmed heuristic driven surveillance is acceptable, even for trivial things, and psychologically healthy. it sends a message that people are cattle or assets that need pervasive tracking. this is not an attitude we need in a culture that aspires to individual liberty. I'd even argue that attendance itself is a step in that direction.. there's no need to know where the kid is every minute of every day. if his grades are good, it's fine. if they're not, well, then look into why. this is another cowardly example of school systems wanting the power, yet shirking the responsibility with automation (ie getting to know your students in this case).

    9. Re:Get used to it by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      The chips are placed underneath each school's coat-of-arms or on one of the sleeves below a phrase that says: "Education does not transform the world. Education changes people and people transform the world."

      am I the only one who sees the (probably) unintentional irony here?

  15. miss reads by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    With a big clump of people moving thought the door at the same time may lead to missing a few reads and with a big load of people beeps may not help as much as they do with one person at a time with a turnstile.

    1. Re:miss reads by kenh · · Score: 1

      If it misses you on the way in, it will get you on the way out.

      By creating a 'choke point' where only one student can go through at a time (turnstile?) the reader can be assumed accurate, but if you want a backup plan, video record the faces of students that pass through the door...

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:miss reads by hawguy · · Score: 2

      With a big clump of people moving thought the door at the same time may lead to missing a few reads and with a big load of people beeps may not help as much as they do with one person at a time with a turnstile.

      Many kids already enter their school single file through the metal detector, so they'll be able to get clean RFID reads.

      I've run dozens of road races where literally hundreds of people were running across the RFID mats at the start, finish and random split locations, and I can only think of one instance where I didn't get a chip time (which is recorded separatly from clock time), and that was the time that someone stepped on my foot in a crowded start, flattening out the RFID tag (which put a kink in the antenna). I think RFID can handle a few dozen kids walking through the doorway together.

    3. Re:miss reads by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      I don't think you want a choke point in a school since you have to consider what might happen there if something goes wrong like a fire in the school. Kids are more likely to panic in that situation and having a choke point is just going to cause more problems especially if there is a real danger to the kids.

    4. Re:miss reads by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      GP is just doing what we slashdottians love to do: if we see an idea that we didn't think of ourselves, the idea must be flawed. Furthermore, it must be flawed in a way that is painfully obvious - because surely the designers of a system we failed to think of couldn't have thought of these obvious failure cases.

    5. Re:miss reads by hawguy · · Score: 1

      GP is just doing what we slashdottians love to do: if we see an idea that we didn't think of ourselves, the idea must be flawed. Furthermore, it must be flawed in a way that is painfully obvious - because surely the designers of a system we failed to think of couldn't have thought of these obvious failure cases.

      I suspect you're right - especially since many of the arguments are "omg, think about the children! If schools track when children are in school, pedophiles will use this information to prey on children!"

      My wife works in child care, and she faces an uphill battle to get parents of *preschool* children to ensure that their children attend, I can't imagine that it's any easier when dealing with older children. (this is a state subsidized program where unexcused absences cause lack of funding to the program and fines to the parents (who regularly complain that they shouldnt' have to pay a fee when their child doesn't attend school despite the fact that they signed an agreement that clearly spells out their obligation)).

      It's nice that Slashdot readers look upon their own experience where they have parents that actually want them to be in school, but they don't realize that there are many parents out there that view school as a government mandated inconvenience - they really don't want to be responsible for making their children attend school. RFID tracking of attendance, is really no different than teacher roll calls, but it means that instead of the teacher spending the first 5 minutes of class taking roll and reporting absent students, the RFID system takes care of it so the teacher doesn't have to.

      This lack of responsibility on the part of parents is (in my opinion) is why the USA is losing its edge against other countries. I've interviewed job candidates that can't write a grammatically correct paragraph (they were interviewing for a customer service job) and can't calculate a 10% discount even *with* a calculator.

      Schools are failing us when a high school graduate claims "oh, they didn't teach us percentages in school."

      (I realize that the original article is referring to Brazilian schools, but I don't think that such a system would be out of line here. Some schools tolerate metal detectors, what's the problem with an RFID system to replace teacher roll calls?

    6. Re:miss reads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "omg, think about the children! If schools track when children are in school, pedophiles will use this information to prey on children!"

      That's ironic because these chips demonstrate a "think of the children" mentality quite well. Oh, no! Some people could skip school! It's the apocalypse!

      Nothing wrong with roll call.

  16. Good ol' fashioned attendance by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to good ol' fashioned attendance? Back when I was going to school, it was done with Scantron forms. The teacher took attendance and sent a runner to deliver the form(s) to the attendance office where they were processed. Once it was determined that a kid was out that shouldn't have been, that office called the parent to ascertain where the kid was. Simple, effective, and hardly Orwellian.

    Don't get me started on taking attendance in college courses, though...

    1. Re:Good ol' fashioned attendance by Cwix · · Score: 1

      My school didn't even go that for technologically. Roll was called, teacher checked the correct box. Slip was filled out and in between classes that teacher would deliver the results to the office to be dealt with.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  17. Re:Lo-tech hacking by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    No, you need your buddy to take your shirt to class with him. Is the GPS good enough to know "two people are in the same chair?"

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  18. Not sure why you want that by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    These are tags in the uniforms of CHILDREN

    Early monitoring by the state is especially depressing.

    I would love to know if my teens cut school.

    It's too bad instead you'll only know if your kids clothes are at school.

    I'd say the going rate per day to hold a jacket in my backpack going to class could easily exceed $1, even in Brazil.

    So why is it valuable to train your kids to be sneaky bastards?

    If the state is not monitoring them you can place much more sophisticated devices for spot checks without them even thinking about the possibility. Once you get a paranoid teen you are utterly screwed and blind.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not sure why you want that by icebraining · · Score: 1

      This is not more "monitoring the state" than a traditional roll call. It's just logging entrances and exits. Doing it automatically or by hand is irrelevant.

    2. Re:Not sure why you want that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, all the kids have to do to bypass roll-call now is take the chip out of their uniform and leave it in class.

  19. Dad, these wafers taste like crap... by crovira · · Score: 1

    Why put them in their uniform? The kid gets naked and your tracking goes in a messy pile of laundry next to the bed he's cavorting in. Or they ditch the uniforms are go for a ride while the uniform is still reporting them as school.

    Make the kids eat the chips every few days. This way you'll be able to identify their mangled remains after their car goes off the road or after they get kidnapped, murdered, their bodies set on fire after the parents cant pay the ransom....

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  20. Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ah yes, the conservative mentality: children are pets of their adult owners.

    Conservatives are the ones for freedom and elimination of government oversight at all levels.

    Liberals are the ones who do things "for your own good".

    Get it straight man or you end up voting for exactly the opposite result as you desire. See: present.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Conservatives are the ones for freedom and elimination of government oversight at all levels.

      (new keyboard; please send me one.)

      btw, thanks for the bellylaugh.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by causality · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ah yes, the conservative mentality: children are pets of their adult owners.

      Conservatives are the ones for freedom and elimination of government oversight at all levels.

      Liberals are the ones who do things "for your own good".

      Get it straight man or you end up voting for exactly the opposite result as you desire. See: present.

      Actually conservatism is all about worship of the status quo. It is the belief that it should change very slowly if at all. It's misused all the time by people who don't understand it, and so has become one of those words that means whatever the speaker intends it to mean. But that's the actual definition; look it up if you doubt me.

      Libertarians (similar to classical liberals, nothing like modern liberals) are the ones who want to maximize freedom. Libertarianism is the belief that consenting adults should be able to do whatever the hell they want, no matter who disapproves, so long as they don't pose a threat to non-participants. Libertarianism would seriously take off as a political movement if it were possible to get candidates on the ballot for all major elections, which is why the two-party duopoly creates ridiculously elaborate, inconsistent, burdensome electoral rules and deeply entrenched funding mechanisms to prevent this from happening.

      Of course, "convervative" has been co-opted as a term and now tends to mean someone who is prudish, religious in an institutional (not personal) way, and wishes their preferred lifestyle to have the force of law, combined with the celebration of corporate power over state power. Just like "liberal" has become co-opted to mean "we know what's good for you" social engineering as well as an obsession with group identity (black, white, female, etc) at the expense of dealing with people as individuals. In that sense conservatives tend to be materialistic while liberals tend to be utterly childish and unable to separate their emotions from reason. Both are the delight of power-hungry politicians everywhere because both can be pandered to.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      Conservative, liberal, republican, democrat, left, right... I don't really care. Just show me a good candidate and I'll vote for them.

    4. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      You are kidding, right? Lets see. Anti-gay laws. Invasion of nations that have NOTHING to do with anything.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by russotto · · Score: 1

      Libertarians (similar to classical liberals, nothing like modern liberals) are the ones who want to maximize freedom. Libertarianism is the belief that consenting adults should be able to do whatever the hell they want, no matter who disapproves, so long as they don't pose a threat to non-participants. Libertarianism would seriously take off as a political movement if it were possible to get candidates on the ballot for all major elections

      Wrong. Most people don't want freedom. They want a maximum of control to avoid bad outcomes. Suggest that something should be legalized that was banned only recently (e.g. riding in a car without a seat belt) and they'll recoil in horror.

      Liberty? Forget about it. It has neither constituency nor champion.

    6. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Conservatives are the ones for freedom and elimination of government oversight at all levels.

      Liberals are the ones who do things "for your own good".

      Get it straight man or you end up voting for exactly the opposite result as you desire. See: present.

      You should go tell Rick Santorum that he's running for the wrong party, then.

    7. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Libertarianism would seriously take off as a political movement if it were possible to get candidates on the ballot for all major elections, which is why the two-party duopoly creates ridiculously elaborate, inconsistent, burdensome electoral rules and deeply entrenched funding mechanisms to prevent this from happening.

      By your argument, in countries where political systems do not have a two-party duopoly, and third parties can easily get on the ballot and garner votes, they should do really well. Why, then, it does not happen in practice?

      E.g. in New Zealand, the parliament is elected using MMP, making it pretty easy for small parties to get at least one candidate in. Yet, their Libertarian party has never managed to get a single seat - they've tried five times under MMP, getting less than 1% of votes every time (in fact, 4 out of 5 times, they've got less than 0.1%), and their individual candidates didn't fare well in any district, either.

      I'm not aware of any country, no matter what electoral system is in place, that had ever given a libertarian party a notable presence in the parliament, much less a majority.

    8. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people figure out they can vote themselves money. Worked that way since antiquity. Who doesn't like free money?
      Also, nobody wants to be responsible for themselves.

    9. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this some American newspeak? Doubleplusgood for you.
      In the rest of the world, "liberal" still means someone that adheres to, you know, liberalism.

    10. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      Indeed. The problem is this - Most people aren't libertarians.

      Everyone wants to be free, but few want everyone to be free.

      Until this changes, none of us can be free.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:Hey buddy, that's as liberal as it comes by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So then what you're saying is that libertarianism is fundamentally incompatible with democracy?

  21. Shhh by kenh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't tell the kids there are 'magic transmitters' in their school uniforms - they'll just take off the RFID tag-laden article of clothing and put it in a friends backpack...

    And the teachers will wonder how her computer says every student is in the class when half the seats are empty?

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Shhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they'll just take off the RFID tag-laden article of clothing ...

      Well, that means they're not wearing a shirt. If all the boys go shirt-less someone, probably will go undetected. If all the school-girls remove their shirts, they will still be noticed. (Girl-only schools excepted.)

      they'll just take off the RFID tag-laden article of clothing ...

      That's why British schools are using finger-print ID. It is very difficult to pass-off a finger-print. And the child must actively put his 'hand up' to be identified. Whereas, with RFID, the number of scanners can be increased, creating an Orwellian surveillance system.

    2. Re:Shhh by echucker · · Score: 1

      If you're worried about Orwell, THIS is the system to be afraid of. They're getting your fingerprints in an institutional fashion, and not just capturing those of processed criminals later on.

  22. Re:Lo-tech hacking by jordanjay29 · · Score: 2

    That works until classes start moving around, like gym, theatre, shop, etc or meeting in different rooms. Not to mention having to make special cases for days with assemblies, field trips and other special circumstances.

    I'd guess that would be a huge load of work, and schools would be better off just making sure kids are in the school itself, and letting the teachers and staff ensure that students are in class once they're inside.

  23. Hello Brazil! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    You're new to the news on Big Brother! Welcome to the Axis of Oppression!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    1. Re:Hello Brazil! by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it's not all of Brazil, it's just the schools in one city.

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
  24. low tech solution by tortovroddle · · Score: 2

    Take off your T-shirt and give it to a friend. He will enter and stay in school with it. At the end of class, take it back outside the school.

  25. Do we need this to tell if kids cut classes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't there other, cheaper ways to see if a kid cuts classes?, like say, roll call?, or maybe just the teacher looking at the empty seats?

    If it was, say, for kidnapping, that would be one thing; kidnapping in the area is quite common, but school attendance?

    1. Re:Do we need this to tell if kids cut classes? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      In fact, RFID is probably cheaper than the teacher's time for taking the atendance.

      This is just wrong, not expensive. (Oh, and won't work either.)

    2. Re:Do we need this to tell if kids cut classes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, like everything else that is automated, people will think it's infallible, and those who, say, didn't just walk close enough to the reader, will ge detention, maybe even suspensions, and the ones actually skipping will just pay people to check them in, so will have spotless records. Oh, and they'll make sure the system cannot be modified by a human, so it's even more Infallible.

      Or, the kid too tired to make sure he got scanned properly will create the equivalent of an amber alert.

      Or predators of all sorts will have the ability to track students as they walk around the town, (who, just so happened have already been noted as being a truant, and therefore not expected at school). Or just grab one of the kids who has already been checked in, so the parents will safely assume is at school, (because no kid has ever thought about showing up, and then ducking out the first time they won't be noticed).

      People will stop using other forms of child monitoring, because the RFID system says they were in class, who's a teacher to disagree?

      There are just so many holes that it can't even be called swiss cheese.

  26. Re:hihg tech solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take off your T-shirt and eat it.
    Shit out the shirt in a classroom.
    ???
    Profit.

  27. Re:Lo-tech hacking by icebraining · · Score: 1

    Do you really think they're putting a GPS (plus some kind of GSM modem to keep track of the location ) in each uniform? And that whole setup fits "underneath each school's coat-of-arms"?

    It's probably a basic RFID tag that gets logged by a reader by the door.

  28. Need to force them to learn science by hessian · · Score: 1

    If not, they'll become fundamentalists or Muslim terrorists. Or racists.

    Normally I'm against Orwellian schemes, but this one is for a good cause.

  29. my school library had anti theft tags in the books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so we used to rip them out and stuff them in the bags and jackets of the people we didn't like (kids and teachers alike)

    if there is a penalty for not having the tags then you can bet kids will use that against the others

  30. how does this solve anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long until little Suzie is carrying around 4 shirts/skirts in her bag for $10 each for her friends?

  31. What Are We Teaching? by walkerp1 · · Score: 1

    We certainly aren't teaching responsibility. That requires trust. I've reared several kids throughout the years. Some I micromanaged. Later, I learned to teach them morals and ethics and allowed them to develop their own behaviors while still maintaining a safety net where required. The latter group seem much more well-adjusted and have avoided a lot of the trouble the first set still manages to find. In my opinion, the government is not doing these kids, and itself by extension, any good.

  32. As a practical matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I remember 4 to 14 year olds, there isn't much to see here. Many other schools have done punch-in/out with ID cards and finger swiping, and RFID is the same. A lot of the senarios in the comments are extraordinary cases that you WANT the system to fail on so a parent can intervene.
     
    In the US, you wouldn't use this system, rather you'd add your school to your 'Find My Friends' app.

  33. The solution is simple. by Cazekiel · · Score: 1

    Something tells me that these kids' backpacks are gonna be bulging with extra clothes, leaving their parents wondering why every time they hit refresh on creepyorwellianshit.com their kid hasn't moved from the bleachers by the football field for three hours straight. "Well, at least they're at school!" they say as lil' Bobby's wandering around town in their everyday-outfit with half of his class.

    --
    You want to know how to help your kids? LEAVE THEM THE F*&K ALONE. --George Carlin
  34. That's terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how many is a brazilian?

    1. Re:That's terrible! by mykos · · Score: 1

      I think this story might be a fake. that's more children than there are in the entire world

  35. Re:Lo-tech hacking by hawguy · · Score: 2

    Do you really think they're putting a GPS (plus some kind of GSM modem to keep track of the location ) in each uniform? And that whole setup fits "underneath each school's coat-of-arms"?

    It's probably a basic RFID tag that gets logged by a reader by the door.

    They don't need GPS to track RFID chips on-campus, they just need RFID readers at every classroom and building exits.

  36. Re:Lo-tech hacking by icebraining · · Score: 1

    Which is not the plan. They'll only install a reader by the door, according to the news reports.

  37. Re:Lo-tech hacking by green1 · · Score: 1

    And what purpose does this serve? have teachers completely forgotten how to take attendance? I know it's low tech, but it's a whole lot more accurate, cheaper, and much less orwellian.

  38. Don't even try to fool us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really, conservatives don't want to do things "for your own good" then why have they made an argument based on their greater moral superiority?

    Why was Newt Gingrich wanting to put school children to work as janitors to teach them lessons in a work ethic?

    What does Rick Santorum claims he women not to have birth care since it'll be better for them morally?

    Why does Ron Paul want us to be on the gold standard, if not for our own good?

    Why does Mitt Romney....oh who am I kidding, Mr. Etch-A-Sketch doesn't even have the principles of the others. And no, he's not severely conservative either.

    But the others are, and they sure claim to be in it, and based their actions on fixing us.

    They also want more government oversight. Can't have people voting without ID. Might have somebody buying food with a program in a strip club. Might have somebody who didn't complete Form 61-A in triplicate getting Medicaid! And there might be some women somewhere having sex, God help us!

  39. Thats kind of orwellian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of this movie. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088846/

  40. CONSERVATIVES by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Really, conservatives don't want to do things "for your own good" then why have they made an argument based on their greater moral superiority?

    You are thinking of social conservatives, not the general conservative/libertarian.

    Even most of the current social conservatives are all about limiting federal power, they can see which way the wind blows.

    Why was....

    Deleted pointless rants about people who will not be the next president no matter what.

    Why does Mitt Romney....oh who am I kidding, Mr. Etch-A-Sketch doesn't even have the principles of the others.

    Incorrect. He fluidly adopts whatever principals are popular. Those happen to be conservative, not really social conservative as noted.

    You argument is fundamentally flawed aanyway since you are arguing he may not be wholly conservative when we have countless living examples from Obama taking choice away right now.

    You better hope Romney can hold down this principals a term or two because otherwise we are going down the jackboot hole with liberal boots at our throats.

    Can't have people voting without ID.

    You can't have real elections without giving people one, and only one vote. They must be secure. That is not removing a right, that is making your vote actually mean something.

    But if you are agains that by all means let me warm up my hacker hands and totally invalidate any vote you care to put forward.

    You really do not seem to understand where we are headed or what is at stake now, very disturbing...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:CONSERVATIVES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude, it's too late to disown them by saying "I'm a conservative, but not like those conservatives" you should have made it clear from the start that you weren't associating with them.

      Why? Because I know tomorrow, no matter what you claim today, those conservatives will be setting the agenda. That's the problem, even if you do genuinely claim to have better morals than the ones you just dismissed, you're going to end up hanging out with them.

      Or propping up a guy like Romney who will badly pretend to believe anything just to get your vote. Fortunately he's likely to fall in the election because of that being obvious to everybody else.

      And I'm not worried about losing some choices, because sometimes not being allowed some choices leads to a net increase of freedom for all. Why? Because if you're free to do anything, you can be free to put people in chains.

      However your hacker hands invalidating the vote? That's the point dude, voter ID won't do anything about that. It does nothing to actually tie a vote to a specific ID, nor to secure the election systems. All it is doing is putting a barrier up to stop people from voting in a way that is not exploited in any significant or meaningful way.

      You're the one who doesn't seem to understand where we are headed or what's at stake.

    2. Re:CONSERVATIVES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking of social conservatives, not the general conservative/libertarian.

      Even most of the current social conservatives are all about limiting federal power, they can see which way the wind blows.

      Which way is that wind blowing, exactly? Pointless wars, which as conservatives liked to remind us all through the Bush years, tend to increase Presidential power? The TSA? A military budget that's larger than every other nation in the world combined? The federal government trying to tell the states who they can and can't allow to marry? A national drinking age that's way too high and unconstitutional besides? Militarized police everywhere? Free speech zones? Lack of effective negotiating power for workers with employers? People fearful to change jobs or strike out on their own because getting sick can literally bankrupt you or kill you? These are all things championed, in the real world, by conservatives.

      You argument is fundamentally flawed aanyway since you are arguing he may not be wholly conservative when we have countless living examples from Obama taking choice away right now.

      Factually and disappointingly true about Obama at least. Obama is not a liberal. He plays one on TV. He is a generally corporate-friendly authoritarian who for the most part appears not to be socially crazy. That's better than how things were before, but nowhere near good enough.

      You better hope Romney can hold down this principals a term or two because otherwise we are going down the jackboot hole with liberal boots at our throats.

      Do I really need to go over my first point again? Militarization of the police, cop and soldier worship, breaking up protests, harassment, and general use of authority against the will of the people are things that self-proclaimed conservatives have been doing my entire life. I'm trying really hard, but I just can't conjure up a memory of liberal jackbooting of any serious consequence. The best I can do is say that some extreme liberals can get kind of stupid when it comes to trying to use regulations to control personal behavior, when they should be used to control corporate behavior. That sort of thing is bad, but generally isn't backed up by hyper-armed police busting down your door without a warrant because they think you're up to something. Not exactly "liberal" there.

      You can't have real elections without giving people one, and only one vote. They must be secure.

      Agreed. Tell me then, why are the particular methods chosen to implement this always the sort of things that tend to make it harder for populations that lean Democratic to vote? For example, a recent Texas law allows the use of concealed weapons permits as ID, but not Texas student IDs. Elections offices issue voter ID cards. They don't have photos on them typically. So, showing photo ID to match with the voter registration is legitimate. Getting picky about which kind of photo ID is politics--specifically, conservative politics.

      But if you are against that by all means let me warm up my hacker hands and totally invalidate any vote you care to put forward.

      Interesting you bring that up. Voting machines and handing the counting of our votes to for-profit corporations is another conservative initiative. Your "hacker hands" couldn't do too much if ballots were counted in public by people in the precincts where they are cast, and then the totals relayed upwards, etc. like they used to be. If you really are a hacker then you must know that computerized voting is a logically unsolvable problem because with computers you need an audit trail of transactions to verify authenticity, and an audit trail of all voting transactions is exactly what you do NOT want in an election. What's really interesting, though, is that ever since the introduction of computerized voting machines, voting irregularities, almost al

  41. You say fallacy, I say heuristic by tepples · · Score: 1

    Slippery slope is a fallacy.

    A lot of heuristics are considered informal fallacies when applied to the absolutely known premises of the artificial world of pure mathematics. But in the real world, premises are not known to absolute certainty. Human minds don't necessarily follow the rules of pure mathematics; they make decisions based on emotion, and they gain bargaining positions from hiding their true premises. The slippery slope, the proverbial boiling frog, political momentum, the Overton window, and the like are ways of modeling these non-ideal effects.

  42. Complement: Little Brother as a reading assignment by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    http://craphound.com/littlebrother/download - some schools in South Carolina and elsewhere might be badly in need of that too...

    At least unlike British politicians the authories of Brazil do not seem to have proposed that kids be implanted with radio IDs (just yet).

  43. Dangerous because it shifts the norm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The main issue for me is, if you're a kid growing up in this situation, you'll then see location monitoring by the authorities as "normal."

    So the society that will exist in 40+ years, when most of the population consists of kids who've grown up with monitoring, won't see any problems with letting the government track everyone...

  44. I knew this would happen - and more worse to come by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the 1980's when they started tagging dogs and cats, - by inserting a chip into the neck of the animal, - in the name of "identify owners of lost pets", I already wondered aloud when will they start doing the same thing to human beings

    This Brazilian example only tag students via chips embedded in their school uniform

    Wait till someone come up with similar scheme with what they did to dogs and cats - insert chips into the body of human beings - and I am sure they can come up with whatever grandiose reason to justify what they do

    It would be not that dis-similar to the tattooing of Jews by the German Nazis

    Those who do not learn from history will find ways to repeat it

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  45. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by garrettg84 · · Score: 2

    I feel like this will encourage streaking. I streaked a few times during high school for laughs, now it will be useful for cutting class. I am certain this will backfire in short order.

    --
    -g
  46. "orwell certainly warned the world about this" by mbkennel · · Score: 1

    I don't seem to remember preventing truancy as a sinister issue to Orwell.

    1. Re:"orwell certainly warned the world about this" by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but he never predicted RFID chips. Orwell wasn't the only person to predict government surveillance, people give him too much credit. He wrote of video and audio surveillance, thought police, and media control, all of which already existed at the time of writing. His main contribution in terms of new ideas was popularising the whole package as a well known dystopia (not that it seems to have helped), and the idea of doublespeak and language corruption.

  47. Orwellian fears are killing people..... by Desmoden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I get a SMS if my car moves 2ft when I'm not in it. My 3 yellow labs all have id chips as well as GPS trackers. My laptop and phone have "find me" features so I don't loose my precious terminal.

    However your kids, your husband, wife, parents run around in complete secrecy under the guise of "privacy"

    When people aren't looking, people do HORRIBLE THINGS. When teachers aren't looking kids do screwed up things, uncles "touch" and ask to not "tell", priests take advantage, people have strokes on hiking trips, pass out in bars.

    I should not only know where my most precious humans are, but I should know they are safe, conscious and alive.

    Sex trafficking, kidnapping, dump luck kill, wounds and mentally damages the brother and sisters and wives and husbands of all of us, and we sit around saying " oh it's totally worth it, because "privacy" is so critical.

    I grew up in a town with a secret gov facility. We were all under constant surveillance We all knew it.

    If sunlight or starlight can touch you, so can anyone who wants to. Anyone who thinks differently is kidding themselves.

    It's time we get over that book and start taking care of our loved ones.

    It MUST be transparent. It MUST have watchers watching watchers watching watchers. It MUST be optional.

    and we MUST stop losing humans like car keys.

    1. Re:Orwellian fears are killing people..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex trafficking, kidnapping, dump luck kill, wounds and mentally damages the brother and sisters and wives and husbands of all of us, and we sit around saying " oh it's totally worth it, because "privacy" is so critical.

      It's absolutely worth it, because privacy is so critical.

      Hate to burst your dystopian dreams, but there exists no force on this planet that can prevent one person from harming another.

      Life is dangerous. Deal with it, bitches.

    2. Re:Orwellian fears are killing people..... by cribera · · Score: 2

      I get a SMS if my car moves 2ft when I'm not in it. My 3 yellow labs all have id chips as well as GPS trackers. My laptop and phone have "find me" features so I don't loose my precious terminal.

      However your kids, your husband, wife, parents run around in complete secrecy under the guise of "privacy"

      When people aren't looking, people do HORRIBLE THINGS. When teachers aren't looking kids do screwed up things, uncles "touch" and ask to not "tell", priests take advantage, people have strokes on hiking trips, pass out in bars.

      I should not only know where my most precious humans are, but I should know they are safe, conscious and alive.

      Sex trafficking, kidnapping, dump luck kill, wounds and mentally damages the brother and sisters and wives and husbands of all of us, and we sit around saying " oh it's totally worth it, because "privacy" is so critical.

      I grew up in a town with a secret gov facility. We were all under constant surveillance We all knew it.

      If sunlight or starlight can touch you, so can anyone who wants to. Anyone who thinks differently is kidding themselves.

      It's time we get over that book and start taking care of our loved ones.

      It MUST be transparent. It MUST have watchers watching watchers watching watchers. It MUST be optional.

      and we MUST stop losing humans like car keys.

      I agree with you, I prefer security over privacy. I have nothing to hide, but I have a life to lose, a kid who could stay orphan if I'm killed. Same for my kid, screw privacy, I prefer to know that my kid is safe. I've been a teenager before and put my health and even my life in danger, I commited academic mistakes that changed my life forever. Sometimes excessive 'freedom' is not good when you're not mature enough. I'll put an extrem example. If you give total freedom to a kid, he'll prefer to watch TV and eat candies and junk food far more that it's wise to allow. With teenagers perhaps is not that obvious, but they also need surveillance and sometimes to be protected from themselves.

    3. Re:Orwellian fears are killing people..... by iggymanz · · Score: 0

      the problem is neurotic psychological marshmallows like you take away liberty from normal people. go hole up in a compound somewhere, the rest of us want to live.

    4. Re:Orwellian fears are killing people..... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you are a fool, ubiquitous camera and location coverage will get interesting footage of your loved ones being molested and raped and murdered, and help police with the paperwork after the fact. Training, knowledge and weapons, now there are parts of a sensible part of a real solution. Quitting the subsidy of breeding criminals, there's another. Eliminating violent criminals, there's another.

  48. Chill out, it's everywhere soon ... by giorgist · · Score: 0

    What do you think putting RFIDs in all products is for. It is convenient because you could walk with a trolley full of goods through the doors and have it charged to your credit card in your pocket.

    These RFIDs will continue to work ... and work and work.

  49. Re:Lo-tech hacking by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And what purpose does this serve? have teachers completely forgotten how to take attendance? I know it's low tech, but it's a whole lot more accurate, cheaper, and much less orwellian.

    Not to mention it puts the responsibility with an adult that should already be investing time, energy, and interest in the child's welfare. Not only will that always be better than an automated system, it's also the right thing a teacher should be doing anyways.

  50. It starts... by amateurhr · · Score: 1

    ...is this going to give a new meaning to "brazilian wax"?

  51. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

    You'd need to leave your clothes in class though.

    --
    One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
  52. Re:Lo-tech hacking by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

    Agreed. That's what my school did, if a child was not in class when the teacher took roll call, then the parents were telephoned. No need for microchips, really.

    --
    One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
  53. You bet they'll do it the Brazilian way by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

    That means, they'll use whatever equipment an expensive contractor can sell. And it won't limit the liberty of the children, because it will work badly for 6 months and none at all after that.

    That is, it will have a chance of working badly if some tribunal somewhere don't declare it illegal. Otherwise, it won't even be turned on.

  54. Re:Lo-tech hacking by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    This is no different from a computerised classroom. Using wifi to log in the student with the smart book when the enter the school yard and then using infra-red login in the class room to exactly note their location. This in conjunction with the teachers computer, who can via their smart book, face match each students class room login, when the students connect into the individual class rooms (lecture theatre, laboratory or various offices) infra-red network.

    Soon as the student logs out of the class room infra-red they switch back to wifi, in the school yard, as they leave the school are, they are logged off from the wifi, requiring a wired connection a place of residence to the school to log back in to access home work etc. You don't want to get caught in over-tracking and privacy invasion and using infra-red in the class room minimising parental concerns.

    Add a camera fish eye lens in the class form random monitoring and teacher evaluation. Measuring a students grade does not measure the teachers skill, it measure the ability of the student to learn (IQ genetic, they either get good brain chemical rewards from learning or not so much), the effort the student puts in, and the amount of educational support provided by parents. Want to evaluate a teachers performance you can only do that by monitoring classes ie measuring the teachers ability to engage, control and teach as class (should be done upon a regular random basis). Also useful to corroborate disruptive students who would do better in special classes, as would the rest of the class (larger class sizes, using computers necessitates elimination a disruptive students to fairly distribute the teachers time to the rest of the students). This taking into account psychopaths and narcissists are born not made and the rest of the students and teacher should not be psychologically tortured by their presence.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  55. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Belial6 · · Score: 2

    Well, the Nazis started with badges on the clothing, and moved up to embedding the ID on the person.

  56. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Vectronic · · Score: 2

    I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find someone to double up on uniforms... or you know, find the chip, take it out, stick it in some else's pocket, which is what I would have done in school.

    But now I'd probably just start collecting uniforms and microwaving them in the cafeteria... "I paid for the uniform, the uniform is fine, too bad about your chip"

  57. Felipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am Brazilian, and thyltin not sure this news is real, many schools in northeastern Brazil barely
    have a board for teachers to give their literacy classes, the reality of chips for monitoring
    students' parents is totally outside the realm of 95% of schools in Brazil ..

    1. Re:Felipe by synthespian · · Score: 1

      It's obviously a corrupt deal. A shitty school district, from Brazil's shittiest region (the "North East"), spending a huge sum of money for tech not even developed countries dare implement.
      The writing is pretty much on the wall...

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  58. Excessive surveillance is bad and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but I think we're missing a far more important problem here.

    TEACHERS AREN'T NOTICING WHEN STUDENTS ARE NOT PRESENT.

    For the cost of installing RFID readers everywhere, installing the necessary computer infrastructure, creating new uniforms with tags sewn in, and training everyone to use the new system, wouldn't it have made more sense to simply issue each teacher a laptop with which to send out attendance alerts? The only reason I can think of to use this system is that teachers aren't noticing when a student doesn't show. And if the teacher can't take attendance effectively, how the hell are they teaching effectively?

  59. A Brazillion by dfay · · Score: 1

    Wait, how many schoolchildren?

  60. tampering nearly impossible.. by lindoran · · Score: 0

    because that phrase isn't open ended at al...

  61. this is no different than.. by thephydes · · Score: 1

    having swipe cards to mark the roll lesson by lesson, and keeping track of when a kid goes out of class for any reason. Yes, this system IS in place in some schools and I applaud it.

  62. MOchip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explain exactly how is this "evil" (and remember this is a simple RFID tag, not a GPS locator).

    Guys you can read a RFID tag at 150 feet if not more, i would say maybe up 1 mile with of the shelf tech, and with military tech maybe up to 10 miles and space.is only 7 miles up, so the could scan you from orbit
    also your forgeting that every store and warehouse, post office/UPS/fedex van and WIFI RFID reader anyone with ipadd rfid reaer could scan you on way home from school, plus walmarts been doing this for over 10 years now.

    i see this has the freemason setting up from there movement from fingerprinting to mirochiping with there mochip programms, they say they will not do it but only matter of time after the Facebook/coke/irasel/mtv club RFID tag program test run looking very true they want use has test lab rats and cows

    first they take you fringerprints saying for cops to find if you lose, then take your DNA(which can self-copy meaning anyone that has your DNA can frame you for crimes)later the make idea like this one saying pedos want your kids so better chip them like a cow ears are in beef factorys or how cats and dogs are at vets it his the same chip only upgraded. they want track us so they can understand us better and learn to use that to control us like rats in maze
    http://mochip.org/

  63. So tired of hearing about Orwell by Dr.+Hellno · · Score: 2

    1984 was puerile, unsubtle propaganda, and almost as laughably hysterical as the commenters who refer to it at least once per thread. Don't you realize how utterly boring and mindless it is to repeat, again and again, that "Orwell warned the world"?

    Do you think that gesticulating wildly in the direction of 1984 makes you look smart? It's a children's book.

    1. Re:So tired of hearing about Orwell by wisty · · Score: 2

      It was also a blatant rip-off of "Darkness at Noon", a thinly-veiled fictionalization of the Moscow Trials. But Koestler was a rapist as well as a genius, so his books haven't really done as well as they should (except the one about rape ... go figure).

    2. Re:So tired of hearing about Orwell by retchdog · · Score: 1

      darkness at noon is fine, but when i later found out that koestler was an apologist for lysenkoism (as in his bio of kammerer), i lost a lot of respect for him.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  64. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    It would be not that dis-similar to the tattooing of Jews by the German Nazis

    I agree 100%. Being made to go to class is EXACTLY IDENTICAL to being put in an oven.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  65. Re:Lo-tech hacking by Kidbro · · Score: 1

    No, it's not cheaper. It takes a few minutes from every single class. In a fourty minute class, that's ~5% of the time. I suspect that if you could increase teacher efficiency by 5% that's well worth the cost of a few rfid chips and readers.

  66. Coming soon to a university near you? by supercrisp · · Score: 1

    I recently attended a mandatory meeting at my university that was an extended sales pitch. I've actually attended about five of those so far this year. Administrators eat that crap up, especially the brown-nosing from the salesperson. Anyway, this particular one was about half about how wonderful it will be if we adopted their RFID system for student tracking. It's primarily aimed at attendance, which is a major problem at out institution. We have, in our general education courses, an about 40% attendance rate, which is, perhaps not coincidentally, the pass-rate for those same courses. I'm expecting administration to buy these damn RFID things, which will be another waste of cash. The problem isn't taking attendance; the problem is that there are no significant penalties for failing to attend. And that won't change because federal money in the form of tuition is dependent on keeping that nonattending student enrolled.

  67. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Now what do you think that backpack is for if not for carrying clothes? Or did you honestly want to spend your time in town in your school uniform?

    Jeesh... kids these days, you gotta tell them really everything. Back when I was young we had to figure out ourselves how to cut class without getting caught, where would you kids be these days without the internet?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  68. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    "my mom always warmed up my socks in the microwave when it was a cold day, and it's a cold day, so I thought, hey, why not warm up my school uniform..."

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  69. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Opportunist · · Score: 0

    You have not been subjected to bullying, I get it?

    Dying once or being brought close to it day in and day out for roughly 8 years... now, obviously I cannot compare it sensibly since I lack the empirical experience of the former but ...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  70. Already in America by bengoerz · · Score: 1

    At least one company in the US, Aim Truancy Solutions (http://www.aimtruancy.com/), is tracking students with school-issued GPS devices.

    PC World recently covered an early adoption: http://www.pcworld.com/article/220225/california_school_district_battles_truancy_with_gps.html

    Financially, it makes sense for the school districts because they lose so much attendance-based funding on truant students.

  71. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell would freeze over way before there would be a cold day in Vitória da Conquista. That's a hot town even by Brazilian standards. Their lowest temperatures are above 25C (that's about 75F for the metrically impaired).

  72. Re:Lo-tech hacking by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

    Walk in the door, climb out the window! Problem solved!

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  73. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 0

    It would be not that dis-similar to the tattooing of Jews by the German Nazis

    I agree 100%. Being made to go to class is EXACTLY IDENTICAL to being put in an oven.

    No, dumbass, it's not but the method is reminiscent of racism. Try to understand what you read and if you don't or you don't have anything relevant to say, shut the fuck up.

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  74. Oh, shut the fuck up wannabe expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes you an expert in the field without a doubt? Nothing. STFU!

    1. Re:Oh, shut the fuck up wannabe expert by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      You're nothin'! A mere clone...!

  75. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It's not on you to decide when I feel cold, you insensitive clod!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  76. The only thing false here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is your attempts at seeming intelligent. Stop now, it's not working.

    1. Re:The only thing false here by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      Oh... I see. The same person, huh? You're just trying to deny Gamemaker's greatness!

  77. Check for yourself moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you look into things yourself? Do others have to show you?? Apparently so. No small wonder everyone around here knows you're a moron.

  78. gmextremacy is living proof of his own words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 look at gmextemacy proves it. He's living proof of his own words

  79. gmexcrement speaks from his own experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both as a molested child and now as the molester doing it to kids.

  80. gmexcrement, answer a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you so stupid?

    1. Re:gmexcrement, answer a question by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      I... can't believe it! My arguments were all destroyed! You have singlehandedly destroyed every single one of my arguments by providing a highly logical counterargument!

  81. I can see it by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Timmy, how come you are wearing 6 tags? And where are your "friends" John and Max?

  82. Brazillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF... I come here looking for a joke about it must cost a fortune to outfit a brazillian uniforms with RFID tags and instead all I see is inane discussion about a satirist who's been dead for 60 years. What happened to the fun-loving slashdot of old? Do they even have a "funny" rating anymore?

  83. It's Not Just For Schools Either by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    I informally suggested something very similar to this years ago, to solve a problem with local retirement and "assisted living facility" homes in the area. They were (and still are) having big problems with residents wandering out and away, missing for days, dying of exposure in nearby fields and woods, that sort of thing. And apparently no solution, since the staffs are overworked, underpaid, and often basically useless or irresponsible.

    I suggested RFID tags (which is what they're talking about here, not computer chips) and an alarm or at least monitoring system. But nooooo .. too expensive, too hard to understand, too likely to put responsibility back on the home for the well-being of their residents. It never flew. Figures.

    Good for the Brazzies. Kids have no expectations of privacy or freedom anyway; that's why they want to grow up.

  84. We need those exploding collars by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Like in that Rutger Hauer movie I forget the name of. When they wander out of the zone, it detonates.

  85. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With any luck a few of the streakers will be female and there will be pictures.

    Being that, obviously, the Shit Will Hit The Fan because said pictures will be child pornography, OBVIOUSLY. Not because I want to SEE the pictures, or anything like that...

  86. Re:Lo-tech hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother had a tendency to skip an occasional class. One of his teachers got a bit sick of this and brought the rest of the class round to our house to try and find him.

  87. not on forehead or hand at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As happy as I am to learn about this, it does eliminate any privacy the student may have had, and there is potential for abuse.

    I guess I will have to read more to find put what technologies are being used, GPS, cellular? , satellite?

  88. Big difference by professorguy · · Score: 1

    First of all, if they wanted to track you; then they'd sure as hell do it no matter what.

    This is a weak argument. If they wanted to track YOU, this is certainly true. But if they wanted to track EVERYONE, then they'd need the kind of system described here. There is a fundamental difference between the 2 situations.

    1. Re:Big difference by solidraven · · Score: 1

      If they wanted to track everyone they'd still just do it. But they don't. Believe it or not, but you are too boring to be worth tracking.

  89. Go play in your own excrement. Wanker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STFU, Alexander.

  90. Re:I knew this would happen - and more worse to co by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    That's the excuse they'll use for implanting it.

  91. The kids will just ditch class naked by OCedHrt · · Score: 1

    It's only the uniform that is being tagged and tracked.

  92. The new Hitler youth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nazi's would of loved this !