Slashdot Mirror


Black Death Discovered In Oregon

redletterdave writes "The Black Death, a strain of bubonic plague that destroyed nearly a third of Europe's entire population between 1347 and 1369, has been found in Oregon. Health officials in Portland have confirmed that a man contracted the plague after getting bitten by a cat. The unidentified man, who is currently in his 50s, had tried to pry a dead mouse from a stray cat's mouth on June 2 when the cat attacked him. Days later, fever and sickness drove the man to check himself into Oregon's St. Charles Medical Center, where he is currently in 'critical condition.'"

278 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Darwin in action. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the hell did he think it was a good idea to try to get the dead mouse away from the cat in the first place?

    1. Re:Darwin in action. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Funny

      It really wasn't a dead mouse. It was a bag of pot he hid under a bush so his wife wouldn't find it. You can't really tell that to the folks at the hospital.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Darwin in action. by Mannfred · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Frankly, a man in his 50s is less likely to produce new offspring so the accident is unlikely to be of tangible benefit to the gene pool.

    3. Re:Darwin in action. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1, Funny
      It might also be connected with the related news item:

      "Growing Evidence of Football Causing Brain Damage"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:Darwin in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because it could be a weakened mouse that has eaten rat poison, and then the cat dies if not treated with vitamin K to stop the internal hemorrhage.
      I've lost several cats because of this issue.

    5. Re:Darwin in action. by Pi+Is+A+Rational · · Score: 5, Funny

      [citation needed]

    6. Re:Darwin in action. by zill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Evolution isn't just about having babies you know. If that were the case, all men would have evolved condom breaking mechanisms already.

    7. Re:Darwin in action. by icebike · · Score: 3, Funny

      Swoosh !

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:Darwin in action. by Pi+Is+A+Rational · · Score: 1, Funny

      Got opwned, pwnage, etc.. Trolls trolling trolls is becoming tough these days.

    9. Re:Darwin in action. by eqisow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because condoms have totally been around for an evolutionarily significant period of time.

    10. Re:Darwin in action. by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Informative

      The summary specifies it was a stray cat. Who the hell tries to pry open the mouth of a stray cat? You have no idea what kinds of bacteria, viruses, or other nasty infectious things are living in a stray cat's mouth.

      Although we certainly know now.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    11. Re:Darwin in action. by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I don't see condom breaking penises happening - the species continues to propagate and there is no stress factor forcing such a change with condoms at a cellular level (testicles say yay, we're used, babies formed without a condom or with a broken condom only know success and not about failures and unless brain knowledge factors into evolution, which I seriously doubt or all men would have evolved a penis at least 12 inches long and 2 inches thick that can continuously ejaculate by now and women would never have to fake an orgasm because they would always orgasm, cell knowledge is all it has to go off of). Same thing with certain female birth control like the diaphragm. Progesterone as birth control, on the other hand, I could see as a potential stress factor. Without a stress factor, there really is no reason for an evolutionary mutation.

    12. Re:Darwin in action. by Xenx · · Score: 2

      I'm slightly dismayed to not find crude references to already doing so through superior virility.

    13. Re:Darwin in action. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1, Informative

      How insightful of you. I bet you knew that right out of your ass: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_condoms (yes, five hundred years IS evolutionarily significant, although perhaps not enough so for us to all grow teeth on our penises)

    14. Re:Darwin in action. by EdIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's just like your opinion, man.

    15. Re:Darwin in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except the appropriate onomatopoeia is woosh. A swoosh is the symbol on Nike gear.

    16. Re:Darwin in action. by MrWeelson · · Score: 5, Informative

      You probably mean Arthur C Clarke who many think 'invented' the geosynchronous satellite...or brought it into the public arena.

      No idea if he smoked pot though.

    17. Re:Darwin in action. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Frankly, a man in his 50s is less likely to produce new offspring so the accident is unlikely to be of tangible benefit to the gene pool."

      No, you are conflating biology and sociology. Human males are generally fertile even in advanced age. It is females who become infertile with age.

      Some years ago, a reporter for National Geographic, who had been visiting sites around the world known for their clusters of people of very advanced age (100+), made a point of describing how a great many of the older men "put the moves on her", as the saying goes, and also noted how many of them had rather young children.

    18. Re:Darwin in action. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Growing Evidence of Football Causing Brain Damage"

      Yes, watching too much football can definitely do damage. Trust me.

    19. Re:Darwin in action. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      ANY cat's mouth.

    20. Re:Darwin in action. by epilido · · Score: 1

      The condom breaking mechanism is stupidity. If you don't know how to use the condom correctly then it breaks and you pass you genetic material

      Smart persons know appropriate condom usage and do not pass on their lineage. Seems like evolutionary pressure as been applied.

      Epi

    21. Re:Darwin in action. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Who the hell tries to pry open the mouth of a stray cat?"

      He was probably a do-gooder who was trying to save the cute little mousie.

      Karma is a bitch.

    22. Re:Darwin in action. by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Dunno, I've seen some abstinence only sex-ed that claims that's already happened.

      Though they didn't call it "evolution". They hinted at really SMART ninja/MacGyver sperm

    23. Re:Darwin in action. by Prune · · Score: 4, Insightful

      500 years is not evolutionarily significant. Biologically, humans have remained almost unchanged from the early days of civilization 10,000 years ago--just ask any anthropologist.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    24. Re:Darwin in action. by nautsch · · Score: 1

      500 years, eh? What is that? 20 generations? maybe a few more or less. Evolution is not directed, so even if somethings seems evolutionary benificial, it does not mean, that it will develop. There has to be alot of improbabble mutations happening for growing some kind of piercing mechanism on your penis. So in this case 500 years is definitely not evolutionary significant.

      Read up on your evolutionary theory.

      --
      If you find a typo, you may keep it.
    25. Re:Darwin in action. by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      inventor of the geosynchronous satellite

      Actually, that was Arthur Clarke.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    26. Re:Darwin in action. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should try reading the second line of my post too. 500 years is evolutationarily significant. Saying otherwise is nonsense. No, that doesn't mean we'll grow penis spears in 500 years (but one can dream).

    27. Re:Darwin in action. by eqisow · · Score: 2

      I have found a paper on evolutionary rates of change. It calculates an instrinsic rate of evolution of .1 standard deviations per generation. If we call a generation roughly 20 years" we're looking at 25 generations over 500 years. Unless you can provide evidence of a relatively strong selection pressure towards some penis change that makes condoms less effective, I'm going to go ahead and stand by my original claim.

    28. Re:Darwin in action. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure all the papers showing otherwise in the last twenty years are nonsense. You're talking about skeletal/morphological changes which are a tiny, tiny subset of possible genetic changes.

    29. Re:Darwin in action. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Jesus christ does no one read the past the first line of posts any more?!?!

    30. Re:Darwin in action. by anagama · · Score: 1

      Or condom avoidance mechanisms such as: http://www.absolut.com/us

      Also interesting with distilled spirits:

      Consumption of distilled beverages rose dramatically in Europe in and after the mid 14th century, when distilled liquors were commonly used as remedies for the Black Death. Around 1400 it was discovered how to distill spirits from wheat, barley, and rye beers, a cheaper option than grapes.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distilled_beverage#History_of_distillation

      So ... booze got cheaper and more widely available in the century before the introduction of condoms (if the 500 year history of condoms is correct). Plus it cured the plague!

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    31. Re:Darwin in action. by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      Seems like evolutionary pressure (h)as been applIed

                You would think so, but it hasn't. Reason it out a little further and I think you'll see why. One thing condoms are useful for is not having babies until you want to. Delaying reproduction isn't the same as not reproducing. Another thing condoms are useful for is avoiding diseases, some of which could make the user permanently infertile. In the long run, condom use could make some users more reproductively successful, not necessarily less. If you're betting there is significant evolutionary pressure, you're betting that there's a lot of people using a temporary method of birth control to permanently curtail reproduction instead of just to time it better, and that disease prevention doesn't offset avoiding reproduction in high risk situations. Neither of these is statistically supported.

                  There's plenty of examples where having just a few offspring and investing lots of resources into raising them beats having lots of offspring who are mostly on their own - in fact the whole mammalian survival strategy is basically "fewer offspring, more care", and mammals as a whole have been a pretty successful class. Condoms are a mammalian sort of idea.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    32. Re:Darwin in action. by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Actually the evidence all points in the opposite direction, but the researcher is a retired football player.

    33. Re:Darwin in action. by eqisow · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry. I assumed the topic of discussion was evolutionary penile changes due to condom use since that was the topic of the comment I replied to. If we're just making broad statements about evolution then, yes, 500 years can be significant.

      I'm not sure why you would have phrased that like you were calling me out though.

    34. Re:Darwin in action. by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      You mean Roman Catholicism?

    35. Re:Darwin in action. by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      The condom breaking mechanism is stupidity. If you don't know how to use the condom correctly then it breaks and you pass you genetic material

      Smart persons know appropriate condom usage and do not pass on their lineage. Seems like evolutionary pressure as been applied.

      Epi

      That's why God created bananas. So you could practice proper application of a condom. Just ask any American school kid. It's part of their curriculum.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    36. Re:Darwin in action. by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2

      If you are talking about the most recent 500 years, I would argue that advances in medicine and science make the latest 500 years far less significant than any previous period of 500 consecutive years. I would be convinced that the 500 year periods making up the "dark ages" were much more evolutionarily significant than the period in which condoms were in any manner common. According to your own link, if such knowledge and use existed prior to the 5th century AD the knowledge and practice was lost. The most critical times which might lend credibility to your argument, and the crucial usage was missing.

      You replied to several comments already, but provided nothing other than "papers showing otherwise in the last twenty years." No one knows which papers you refer to, nor can anyone check if they have been redacted or superceded.

      Finally, since condom use is mostly a choice, except when it is not available, I don't see it exerting much pressure at all, certainly not as much as whatever factors might be discussed in the uncited articles of yours.

      Quite simply, you are protesting too much and adding little if any to the conversation. There is no evidence that an optional utility would exert any speciation change in the periods in which it may have been available, though not widely used. Feel free to post some sort of citation to the contrary, or just stop replying.

    37. Re:Darwin in action. by Prune · · Score: 2

      [Citation needed]
      The ONLY significant change that is measurable between generations is that of the immune system, which is by evolutionary design, as the immune system is in a constant arms race with pathogens and needs to match some of their speed of change.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    38. Re:Darwin in action. by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      It's not just the offspring he could start producing, it's the offspring he may have already produced.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    39. Re:Darwin in action. by Lysdestic · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that is the symbol for Nike.

      ...which is Headquartered near Beaverton, Ore. Part of the Portland Metropolitan area.

    40. Re:Darwin in action. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Karma ain't workin, or the glibertardians would hemorrhage out of the sole orifice they are speaking from - their arse...."

      So... you stepped in here for the sole purpose of insulting me again, when all I did was make a silly joke to someone else and wasn't talking to you at all.

      That makes you the biggest asshole I've encountered so far in all of my years on Slashdot. Wait... except for one other person, who did exactly the same thing. Once.

      Do you know the definition of "troll"? Maybe you should look it up. And try to guess why people think it's a bad thing.

    41. Re:Darwin in action. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Because you don't want to find it in your bed when you wake up the next morning.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    42. Re:Darwin in action. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Two decades before Clarke, George O. Smith had that idea. Clarke acknowledged this in the forward to the one edition of the the book "Venus Equilateral"

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    43. Re:Darwin in action. by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

      Evolution cannot provide useful features. It can only remove features that result in few or no viable children. Anything useful has to come from random (not to mention rare) genetic mutation, which in turn, creates a feature that is harmful more often than insignificant, and insignificant more often than useful. For men to evolve condom-breaking penises, a male would first have to be born with a mutation which caused it, and as well, he would have to be driven to mate prodigiously. As for the latter condition, I would expect a condom-breaking penis to be rather uncomfortable for the woman, and therefore, this is a mutation which is unlikely to spread quickly.

    44. Re:Darwin in action. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Why are people focussing on the cat? Did you ever stop to think that perhaps the MOUSE was the pet?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    45. Re:Darwin in action. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      About 25 or 30 years ago in Toronto they had a "town forum" on one of the local super stations. The subject was about legalizing pot. Some stoner had the floor and when he got to the mic his speech went something like: "Ya heh heh heh.... Like I smoke pot you know... And like.... ... uhhh ... ... ... heh heh ... I fogot what I was gonna say... ..." then he turned around and sat down. The station this was on broadcast to all of southern Ontario, and transmitters close to the border meant a good chunk of the U.S. across Lakes Ontario and Erie. Potential audience of many millions (actual audience probably a few million since it was during the news hour... pre-internet days). A better spokesman for making weed illegal could not have been found. The panel were speechless for a minute.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    46. Re:Darwin in action. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Civil infraction 27-5 against county Code 54.2.1 Hiding your pot in a fake mouse is a mistreatment in this county.

      $350.00 fine or 2 days in jail.

      There is your citation, you can pay it at the county clerks office.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    47. Re:Darwin in action. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      BIG disagree.

      Medical advances allow the Genetically defective to continue to survive and reproduce. Just 100 years ago this would not have happened.

      Just wait to see how fucked up as a species will will be in 500 years.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    48. Re:Darwin in action. by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You spelled republican wrong.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    49. Re:Darwin in action. by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lactose tolerance is the standard example of recent human evolution.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    50. Re:Darwin in action. by icebike · · Score: 2
      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    51. Re:Darwin in action. by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jesus christ

      Can't we have an irrational flaming discussion about evolution without bringing him into it??

    52. Re:Darwin in action. by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Except the appropriate onomatopoeia is woosh.

      Depends on your dialect. My native dialect is one of the many that still preserve the "wh" sound (which has always actually been /hw/ phonetically, but the usual insane English spelling rules apply ;-). It's only "woosh" if you speak one of the many dialects that has dropped yet another kind of initial /h/, the one represented in the "wh" digraph.

      I'm not aware of any dialects that converted /hw/ into /sw/. But maybe the writer speaks a dialect (idiolect?) that does that. Stranger things have happened in the English language.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    53. Re:Darwin in action. by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Why the hell did he think it was a good idea to try to get the dead mouse away from the cat in the first place?

      He was hungry.

    54. Re:Darwin in action. by jc42 · · Score: 2

      That's why God created bananas. So you could practice proper application of a condom. Just ask any American school kid. It's part of their curriculum.

      And this is why American bananas are a sterile species that reproduces only asexually. All those condoms make banana sex unproductive, so they've been selected for a means of reproduction that is productive under the conditions imposed on them by their human predators.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    55. Re:Darwin in action. by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      And let's also not forget--let's not forget, Edlll, that keeping wildlife, a non-amphibious rodent, for uh, domestic, you know, within the city - that isn't legal either.

    56. Re:Darwin in action. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah... and well not everything is like Nam either.

    57. Re:Darwin in action. by LandGator · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, Charlie was a neighborhood cat, who was well known to everyone on that street, and the sick man was in the habit of inviting Charlie in for dinner, but didn't care for the appetizer Charlie brought. The fever made Charlie atypically cranky, and Charlie chomped down... Three other folks from another household in that neighborhood are also receiving treatment, but don't have the blood-borne version, and they're doing OK. (I have neighborhood sources.) OBTW, no one has mentioned, this is in Prineville, in the High Desert of Crook County, Oregon, 2.5 hrs' drive ESE of Portland, where Facebook's data center is located and other data centers are in development.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
    58. Re:Darwin in action. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      It certainly made my sister's final months in her bone cancer battle much more bearable for her.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    59. Re:Darwin in action. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but every condom I wear is too small and thus breaks.

      Perhaps you need to switch from size XX-s to just X-s?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    60. Re:Darwin in action. by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The rate of stupid isn't growing. Your exposure to them has. Technology and urbanization have brought people together so that stupidity may be experienced in full 3D as nature intended.

    61. Re:Darwin in action. by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't believe I'm even getting involved on this, but your comparison isn't correct. Just as one can have alcohol at anywhere from light beer to pga so too can pot be had with any strength from light buzz to "OMFG where are the cookies?" so it wouldn't be fair to say one is stronger than the other. i would argue that the very fact that it IS illegal is why you get super strength pot now, same as during prohibition you were more likely to get bathtub rotgut than you were a nice light wine. When things are illegal it simply makes more sense to sell the most concentrated you can because the laws treat mellow and strong pot equally and a customer can get more for less by buying stronger stuff.

      I have a feeling once this dark and shameful chapter of our history is over and pot is legal you'll see that just like with alcohol you'll have so many choices in flavor, texture, and intoxication factor that just like with booze there will be something for everyone. Personally i like pot from the Ozarks myself, the rich soil gives it a nice peaty overtone with a lovely aroma, almost like being in a forest, quite lovely.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    62. Re:Darwin in action. by EdIII · · Score: 2

      Personally i like pot from the Ozarks myself, the rich soil gives it a nice peaty overtone with a lovely aroma, almost like being in a forest, quite lovely.

      LOL.

      Ok. Personally, I have never experienced this "mellow" pot that you speak of. Only the super strength stuff. Even just a small puff and I was ready to go Ocean's 11 on the Keebler Elf factory.

      I get your overall point though and I have a strange desire to visit the Ozarks.

    63. Re:Darwin in action. by ancienthart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only on Slashdot could a news article about the Black Death turn into an argument about the relative merits of legalising/punishing pot usage.

    64. Re:Darwin in action. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      right... or we could say that maybe if he didnt smoke the pot that he wouldnt have been as sucessful. plain and simple we dont know, andwe shouldnt assume that" the pot man it, it help him back man, think of all the stuff man, if he didnt just smoke the pot"

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    65. Re:Darwin in action. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      By the Flying Spaghetti Monster, NO!

    66. Re:Darwin in action. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Both are valid, people who have the mutation are called lactose tolerant, people who don't are called lactose intolerant (their the one's with a 'problem' so their the ones you read about). However I was actually refering to the mutation itself which is called lactose tolerance because that is the condition it bestows apon it's owner, lactose intolerance is the pre-mutated condition that was once universal. Having said that, fully agree it doesn't 'look right'.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    67. Re:Darwin in action. by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      It really wasn't a dead mouse. It was a bag of pot he hid under a bush so his wife wouldn't find it. You can't really tell that to the folks at the hospital.

      The moral of the story is never mix pot and catnip.

    68. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is the "lamer curve" again.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    69. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      You mean the early days of THIS civilization. Humans have been smashed into the stone ages at least a couple of times. There have been signs of civilizations uncovered from under 30+ feet of earth in some areas. There are also many underwater cities yet to be examined or discovered.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    70. Re:Darwin in action. by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh if you get a chance you really must go, and not just for the most delicious pot. you should really bring a camera and be ready to stop almost constantly because the vistas you will see are truly some of the most breathtaking i have ever seen, with huge valley scenes with incredible peaks and cliffs and flowing water everywhere, it is truly a wondrous view of nature that one simply must see with your own eyes. I swear you can simply pull on the side of the road in a large chunk of the Ozarks and the view is like standing on this great peak, with all this beautiful unspoiled wonder spread out before you, quite inspiring.

      But I can assure you that its true that in places where there is a lot of fertile land and pot being grown you'll find as many flavors and textures as you do alcohol, everything from lightly mellow to harsh, from sweet to skunky, from tasty to almost medicinal in flavor. If I were to describe the typical pot from the Ozarks it would be peaty with a slight sweet overtone, with a very forest scent, kinda like a mix of pine and juniper, quite lovely. If one were to go to the swampier south AR the pot is more musky, nice tasting but with a definite skunk scent, while the northeast area close to Memphis favors pot that has a much sweeter taste and aroma, almost candy like.

      In a way pot is a LOT like wine in that the kind of soil the plant is grown in and the conditions of the area does seem to cause differences in taste and texture not to mention buzz. I have a feeling most of the pot you've had has been either imported or been grown by mega-growers, their weed tends to be extra strong but not very much in the way of variety, kinda like the rotgut of old. And I can't believe that I'm sitting here actually judging flavors of various cultivars, but as a musician I've got to sample quite a few from different areas and there are some overall themes when it comes to pot grown in certain areas. Oh and FYI the worst pot I ever smoked was East Texas, it'll knock you on your ass but tastes like cheap cigarettes smell, a real ditchweed harsh nasty flavoring.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    71. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      No, we're talking about growing teeth on our penises!

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    72. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 5, Funny

      From the Black Plague to penis fangs, god I love slashdot.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    73. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 1, Funny

      or vagina?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    74. Re:Darwin in action. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot could a news article about the Black Death turn into an argument about the relative merits of legalising/punishing pot usage.

      The thread's out of control. She's going to blow.

    75. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I know, we got off the subject quickly. I was immediately going to make a comment like that, but I was distracted with the visual of a cute, fanged penis.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    76. Re:Darwin in action. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's no way to tell whether our ancestors had "teeth" or other condom-breaking protrusions on their penises. They may or may not have, since boners don't fossilize as well as bones. Maybe we merely lost our vestigial cock-teeth. Or maybe this is where myths of vagina dentata come from--it was the women who had the condom-breaking apparatus.

    77. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of those brain teasers from my management classes.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    78. Re:Darwin in action. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      What the fuck does this have to do with Facebook!? Seriously, I'm trying to make the connection here.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    79. Re:Darwin in action. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There are also many underwater cities yet to be ... discovered.

      For example?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    80. Re:Darwin in action. by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Shwuck off.

      Hey, you speak Yiddish!

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    81. Re:Darwin in action. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Personally, my thoughts were of a hobo fighting a stray cat for a meal of a mouse. >.>

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    82. Re:Darwin in action. by netwarerip · · Score: 1

      Wish I had points left to mod this up. I have been saying this for years.
      While wearing glasses.
      And taking allergy pills

    83. Re:Darwin in action. by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Well i have proof that the general population is far stupider now than 500 years ago. But the rate of stupid started growing exponentially in 1992.

      Today we have masses of drooling morons that cant even figure out how to add water to a radiator if their car was overheating, cant understand that it's bad to not look out the window of the car while driving, and has elected or supports a band of utterly evil people that want to roll back civil rights to the early 1950's.

      Well you're meant to add coolant to radiators as they easily get to above 100 degrees C. In summer in Oz, the coolant in my radiator can start cold at 40+ Degrees C after being left in the sun. If you put water in a radiator you'll find the water boiling out after 5-10 mins of driving.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    84. Re:Darwin in action. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Can't be all-inclusive all of the time...

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    85. Re:Darwin in action. by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      About 25 or 30 years ago in Toronto they had a "town forum" on one of the local super stations. The subject was about legalizing pot. Some stoner had the floor and when he got to the mic his speech went something like: "Ya heh heh heh.... Like I smoke pot you know... And like.... ... uhhh ... ... ... heh heh ... I fogot what I was gonna say... ..." then he turned around and sat down. The station this was on broadcast to all of southern Ontario, and transmitters close to the border meant a good chunk of the U.S. across Lakes Ontario and Erie. Potential audience of many millions (actual audience probably a few million since it was during the news hour... pre-internet days). A better spokesman for making weed illegal could not have been found. The panel were speechless for a minute.

      Agreed, and when I hear something like this, I wonder if it wasn't intentional. It's a well known political tactic to find a subject to pretend to be on the other side in order to make a very bad case for the other side's position.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    86. Re:Darwin in action. by Unipuma · · Score: 2

      Actually, Arthur C. Clarke 'invented' the communication satellite, as in, he picked up on the idea that a geosynchronous satellite would be an ideal platform to bounce your radio waves off around the world. This was during the time he worked as a radar engineer in WW II.

    87. Re:Darwin in action. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But the rate of stupid started growing exponentially in 1992.

      Happy 20th birthday!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    88. Re:Darwin in action. by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a 50 year old man who got into a fight with a cat over a dead mouse.

      We're not talking about Paul McCartney or Michael Douglas.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    89. Re:Darwin in action. by MisterMidi · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, how exactly does brain damage cause football? And how does one grow evidence of it?

    90. Re:Darwin in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A better spokesman for making weed illegal could not have been found. The panel were speechless for a minute.

      Something similar happened in my town a couple years ago. What most people didn't know, but which I did personally point out to the Council, is that the "stoner" was in reality a DEA agent who also co-chaired a local organization bent on "the eradication of pot in our communities". He was full of shit, not pot.
      This did not, however, make it into the paper, which was quite happy to report on the "potheads" looking like idiots in front of the City Council.

    91. Re:Darwin in action. by Boronx · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you can survive and reproduce, you aren't genetically defective.

    92. Re:Darwin in action. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Teeth or spines ?

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    93. Re:Darwin in action. by nautsch · · Score: 1

      I clearly said "in this case". And i stand by that. 500 years may be significant to give some random development an edge in a species, but it will definitely/reasonably certain not cause something beneficial to develop. This might never happen, due to the nature of evolution. And 500 years for something to come into existence by coincidental mutation is very very very unlikely to an extend, that I would say impossible.

      --
      If you find a typo, you may keep it.
    94. Re:Darwin in action. by Teancum · · Score: 1

      There are also many underwater cities yet to be ... discovered.

      For example?

      I think the GP is talking about the Alterans in this historical documentary including a discussion of this city located a few miles to the west of San Francisco.

    95. Re:Darwin in action. by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to read up on epigenetics, and then think about the implications this has for their model of genetic inheritance. Especially for a species that utilizes cultural inheritance along with genetic inheritance.

      --
      Will
    96. Re:Darwin in action. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I have never experienced this "mellow" pot that you speak of. Only the super strength stuff. Even just a small puff and I was ready to go Ocean's 11 on the Keebler Elf factory.

      And one drink of alcohol turns my dad into a raging, violent asshole. Does that mean we should try to ban alcohol again? Think carefully before you answer...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    97. Re:Darwin in action. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Radiator caps raise the boiling point. Antifreeze lowers the freezing point and reduces corrosion. Pure water has a far superior ability to transfer heat than antifreeze, which is why we only put up to 50% antifreeze into our coolant. There is a product called water wetter commonly used in racing with nothing but water which reduces corrosion but does not reduce the freezing point, and when winter comes the coolant is changed — at that point, the additional cooling ability of water vs. water+antifreeze is unnecessary. There's also alternative coolants like Evans NPG which are much more expensive but which have much higher boiling points (and even lower freezing points) which actually improve the engine's ability to handle heat since when water boils inside your engine the thermal conductivity goes way, way down.

      Sounds to me like you need to upgrade your cooling system, perhaps with a bigger radiator and more fan capacity, or something like Evans NPG (Never used it, no relation, could be shit but a lot of people seem smug about it.) If you're driving in conditions for which a vehicle wasn't really designed (and many vehicles are just poorly designed to begin with) then you can't expect it to behave without some upgrades. That, or there's something wrong with your vehicle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    98. Re:Darwin in action. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Why the hell did he think it was a good idea to try to get the dead mouse away from the cat in the first place?

      Probably to keep the cat from bringing it into the house, Cats like to bring trophies home. Even worse sometimes they bring home toys, mice 3/4 dead, when they get tired of swatting them around, they forget them, soon they become mice that are 3/4 alive.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    99. Re:Darwin in action. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Some people are totally clueless about animals. Decades of being raised in a "Bamby-ist" environment produces people who think Nature is a Disney cartoon. Have some nice plague for being stupid.

      The best way to deal with stray dogs and cats has always been "farm rules". Trap or shoot them then properly dispose of the corpse. If critters are free to kill each other, we should be free to kill them. I am.

      I keep chickens so any stray without a collar on my property gets shot, which is only a couple over many years.

      BTW we rescue and relocate non-poisonous snakes when they turn up in the coop. They are valuable for rat and mouse control. People fear the wrong things. Snakes, generally speaking, are benign. (Know the difference BEFORE you handle them!) Mammals carry all sorts of nasty stuff and may be rabid.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    100. Re:Darwin in action. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      First of all: 500 years *is* irrelevant.
      Second: evolution means you have to have a mutation, some mutation that allows you to pierce condoms for instance. As long as such a mutation is not happening time is completely irrelevant.
      And finally you need to have a selection pressure, that means men with that mutation must breed more than other men (I fail how that should work as other men freely breed by not using a condom at all) *or* other men need to die more early than the one with the mutation.

      Adaption (in the sense of evolution) means: some mutant is fitting better to the situation at hand than the original "normal" species. There is however there is no: "wow the situation is awful, we need to mutate, adapt and breed better/faster effect" involved.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    101. Re:Darwin in action. by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I would however wager that Arthur knew someone who knew someone who smoked pot.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    102. Re:Darwin in action. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I'm fortunate in that whenever my cat catches mice, she just gives it a couple of good hard whacks and eats it. None of this mummy cat try-to-show-the-kittens-how-to-hunt thing, just *thud* *munch munch munch*.

    103. Re:Darwin in action. by sapgau · · Score: 1

      They are called "interesting facts"

    104. Re:Darwin in action. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I think I have been misunderstood.

      My point was that both pot and beer can make somebody pretty stupid. It usually does not take as much pot though.

      Neither should banned.

    105. Re:Darwin in action. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Haha! Good point.

    106. Re:Darwin in action. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, exactly. I mean, I have a lovely wee cat but I'm under no illusions about how nature works. Of all our domesticated animals, cats are probably the closest to wild. For a cat, "domesticated" means "turn up at mealtimes and purr and look cute, and pee outside, and things become very easy".

      Even if I was quick enough to get to it, I don't think I'd want to try to get a mouse away from my cat. I've got enough scratches and injuries, and my kevlar gloves are pretty knackered as it is.

    107. Re:Darwin in action. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My point was that both pot and beer can make somebody pretty stupid. It usually does not take as much pot though.

      Well, I don't know about that, I think my comment was equally about the idea that things affect people differently.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    108. Re:Darwin in action. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      The important difference between marijuana and alcohol isn't potency or side effects, but practical controllability.

      A random third grader of mediocre intelligence is exceptionally unlikely to accidentally discover how to make his own marijuana using nothing but common food and a piece of Tupperware. Producing it in any substantial quantity at all either has to be done outdoors in plain sight where it can be spotted from airplanes, or else it requires special equipment and draws an unusual amount of power. Either way, people who grow it in any developed area, in any quantity suitable for distribution, invariably get caught. That makes it effectively an import, which makes it theoretically controllable (not absolutely, but to a great extent).

      Attempting to prevent people from getting alcohol, on the other hand, is like attempting to prevent teenagers from making rude comments. You can make basic alcohol (beer, wine, etc) in a six-foot-square shed using nothing but food and some containers. Add basic household kitchen equipment and you can make exceptionally strong distilled liquors. The only people who were sober during prohibition were sober before and after prohibition too (unless they weren't around yet when prohibition started and/or had died before it ended). A law against alcohol is like a law against being a jerk -- possibly well intentioned, but totally unenforceable. That doesn't really apply to marijuana -- certainly not to anything like the same extent.

      No, if you want to argue that marijuana should be legal because something else that's at least as bad is legal, alcohol is the wrong substance to compare against.

      Tobacco would be a better comparison. The only reason tobacco is legal is because it always has been. If it were a new product, the FDA would make it go away so fast you'd never even know it existed (unless you're in the habit of reading obscure research journals, and maybe not even then). I have doubts it could even make it into clinical trials, and if it did the effects it has on the heart and nervous system would kill it before the conclusion of phase I.

      Nonetheless, tobacco is theoretically not significantly harder to control than marijuana, substantially more addictive, and WAY too medically harmful to ever be approved for prescription use under the current standards[1] even if it weren't addictive. Yet, it remains legal. If you want to compare marijuana against a legal drug, in order to argue that it should be legal, tobacco is your best option.

      ---
      [1] Technically, something with side effects like tobacco has could be approved, if it were an effective treatment, for extremely intractable and unpleasant targets, like ALS or forms of metastatic cancer for which no good chemotherapy exists. But the drugs we're talking about aren't useful for treating those kinds of conditions.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    109. Re:Darwin in action. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Well i have proof that the general population is far stupider now than 500 years ago.

      Do tell. All you posted was anecdotal generalizations, which are pretty worthless as proof goes.

      Sounds more like "grass is greener" syndrome to me.

    110. Re:Darwin in action. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      would argue that the very fact that it IS illegal is why you get super strength pot now, same as during prohibition you were more likely to get bathtub rotgut than you were a nice light wine. When things are illegal it simply makes more sense to sell the most concentrated you can because the laws treat mellow and strong pot equally and a customer can get more for less by buying stronger stuff.

      The only thing prohibition really does is change the quality of what's available, not so much the strength. There's 180 proof alcohol available today, and people buy it still. They mostly don't, because 180 proof can't be consumed straight, and if it could be, it wouldn't be pleasant in the least bit. There is, however, a good market for stuff in the 'non-distilled' range, just as there was back then. The reason people buy the non-distilled, 'weak' stuff is due to availability and convenience, primarily. If the quality of the 'low refined' stuff was roughly the same today as the 'highly refined' stuff, you can bet that people would be going for the higher refined goods. However, with alcohol there's the case that the stuff in the 10-20% range is typically "very good" and preferred by most: more flavor, more variety, and not distilled.

      There are, of course, those of us who prefer drinking hard liquor straight. That is not the majority, however.

      Look, I smoke cigarettes and cigars. I like them - both the feeling they give me and the oral act of smoking them. In particular, I like good tobacco. If tobacco was illegal tomorrow, I'd be pissed off, because it would still be available but much more expensive. A "dime bag" of tobacco would piss me off, because I know it probably wouldn't even be good leaf and would be exhorbinant. I wouldn't so much be purchasing the 'high potency' stuff because it's better, but simply because the low potency stuff isn't even worth bothering with (for one reason or another).

      For the record, I go with an earlier poster in saying that pot smokers make the best arguement through their continued existence and embarassing behavior as to why pot should remain illegal. Even meth users seem to adapt better after long-term use to functioning within society than early-life pot smokers, from what I've seen. Why? Because once they've stopped geeking, they actually try to lead a successful life. They may relapse, and they may have a hard time of it, but they're trying. A modicum of effort is something most potheads lack, even after they've stopped. It does something to their brains which seems to short-circuit all the effort behind what's required to make their aspirations actually work. To compare, drunks usually have to hit a very low point before they're functioning as poorly as a pothead does on a daily basis.

      Case in point: I believe "lacking the essential motivation to take responsibility for one's self and improve one's own situation" can be fairly well summed up by the behaviors of the indigenous people where hashish consumption is a common, almost universal pasttime.

      I have a feeling once this dark and shameful chapter of our history is over and pot is legal you'll see that just like with alcohol you'll have so many choices in flavor, texture, and intoxication factor that just like with booze there will be something for everyone

      That may be true, but my understanding is that pot already "comes" in many, many different varities and potencies. Some people don't like the 'high' they get from pot, however - regardless the strain. It isn't for everyone.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    111. Re:Darwin in action. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Who? The people who have been indoctrinated by the farce of "animals are just people, too". It reduces their humanity while at the same time elevating their perception of vermin like rats and mice. Net result: absolutely no discernment.

      This is what happens when you see more animals on a daily basis in pet food commercials than you have real animals in a lifetime (amongst other similar limited-life-experience perception inducers). Things like spouting out about the horrible evil of the US Government jackboot cleptogratic thuggery, while completely (and willfully) ignorant of how most of the rest of the world operates. (Sure, it ain't pretty, but it could be, and probably will be, a whole lot worse. Histronics only makes people ignore you and the case you need to present.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    112. Re:Darwin in action. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      In 500 years time, genetic re-engineering will have long since become mainstream ... all those flaws will be bio-engineered out and our offspring will be super-strong and highly intelligent ... except for a small sub-species that thought it was sacrilegious to use such technology.

    113. Re:Darwin in action. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like you need to upgrade your cooling system, perhaps with a bigger radiator and more fan capacity

      I understand what you mean but I think you've misunderstood me, my radiator performs well when the engine is running but when the engine isn't running (the car is parked in the sun whilst I'm at work) there's no cooling. Where I live it gets above 40 degrees C in the summer, leave your car in the sun for 8 hours and the insides get the same.

      In that kind of heat you learn to use things like steering wheel covers and put a sock over the gear-stick. I learned that one the hard way early on as I had a chrome plated gear-stick. I'm sure people who live in places that freeze for a few months have their own tricks.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    114. Re:Darwin in action. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's intentional. I attended a legalize rally at UCLA sometime in the early 90s. Some intelligent professorial guy stood up, gave an impassioned speech for legalization, rambled on about hemp and uses for it, how it would save the world. He was met with silence. The next "speaker" was a dreadlocked fellow, stood up and said "I like Pot cuz i can Smooooooke it!", to the howls of appreciation from the audience.

    115. Re:Darwin in action. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's intentional. I attended a legalize rally at UCLA sometime in the early 90s. Some intelligent professorial guy stood up, gave an impassioned speech for legalization, rambled on about hemp and uses for it, how it would save the world. He was met with silence. The next "speaker" was a dreadlocked fellow, stood up and said "I like Pot cuz i can Smooooooke it!", to the howls of appreciation from the audience.

      Ok, I may have chosen a bad example... but nevertheless, in general, when someone makes a case for a position that absolutely destroys that position, it doesn't hurt to look into ulterior motives. Like, are the dreadlocks a wig? :-)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    116. Re:Darwin in action. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      The knowledge did exist,and we know about it!
      "In days of old, when men were bold, and rubbers weren't invented....."

    117. Re:Darwin in action. by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 1

      C-C-C-Condom Breaker!

    118. Re:Darwin in action. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      People are just animals, too.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    119. Re:Darwin in action. by Prune · · Score: 1

      Who cares.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    120. Re:Darwin in action. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      my radiator performs well when the engine is running but when the engine isn't running (the car is parked in the sun whilst I'm at work) there's no cooling. Where I live it gets above 40 degrees C in the summer, leave your car in the sun for 8 hours and the insides get the same.

      You appear to be confusing the cooling system for the engine with aircon/climate control.

      Do you actually know anything about cars?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    121. Re:Darwin in action. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You appear to be confusing the cooling system for the engine with aircon/climate control.

      No, I know what I'm on about, it appears you are confusing the cooling system for the aircon?

      I'm mentioned the radiator (if your cooling system fails, 9 times out of 10 its the radiator thats the problem), you know the one attached to the engine by 2 hoses. Those hoses contain a coolant fluid that is not in motion whilst the engine is switched off, it's this coolant fluid that allows the engine to bleed heat via a radiator.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiator

      So not only is it obnoxiously clear you don't know anything about cars, it's painfully obvious you don't even read posts because I have no idea how you got "aircon" from "radiator".

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    122. Re:Darwin in action. by benhattman · · Score: 1

      Ye Gads I hate seeing this argument.

      What do you even think genetically defective even means? Here's a hint, it's not what you think it means. Sure, this might mean that more people are born with asthma and survive to reproduce. But, just because asthma is generally maladaptive, doesn't make it a bad evolutionary route to traverse. Perhaps, there is a protein that is required for people to evolve better cancer fighting, and the most direct evolutionary path is one that includes asthma.

      What's really happening isn't Idiocracy so much as the total gene pool is given an opportunity to widen. In the short term, we have a lot of people with poor vision, in the long term, who knows!

    123. Re:Darwin in action. by benhattman · · Score: 1

      Duh. Facebook IPOed. Literally nothing else matters to society anymore.

      Though, GP could have jumped to the point and just said "Facebook, facebook, face book. Facebook" and left out the stuff about the cat. Who cares about a feline?

    124. Re:Darwin in action. by ancienthart · · Score: 1

      Insightful??? Come on guys, I was clearly going for Humour. :D

  2. stupid by donaggie03 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe you shouldn't be screwing around with wild animals and their food . . .

    --
    Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    1. Re:stupid by donaggie03 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh we want to play the definition game, huh? Well then, by definition (Dictionary.com), feral means

      1) existing in a natural state, as animals or plants; not domesticated or cultivated; wild.

      2) having reverted to the wild state, as from domestication.

      3) of or characteristic of wild animals; ferocious; brutal.

      All three definitions equate feral with being wild, so what was the point of your pedantic nitpicking again?

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    2. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A feral cat is a descendant of a domesticated cat that has returned to the wild.

      Have you ever seen a domesticated tiger? What about a domesticated fox?

      The difference between is mostly just a few generations of human attention. There are some more gradual changes (and numerous abrupt physical changes) at work in dogs, which creates the gap between 'feral' and 'wild' for them, but the most important alterations are purely in how the animal has been raised. Barn cats have been selected for their ability to survive and hunt, after all, for most of history. Not very pet-like traits.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:stupid by shadesOG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The article says it was a cat. Cats, by definition, are not wild. Some of them may be feral, but they are never wild.

      Apparently you don't live in Oregon. We have wild cats. We call them cougars or mountain lions and they can fuck your day up. They have been getting a bad rep for pouncing on mountain bikers. http://www.dfw.state.or.us/wildlife/cougar/

    4. Re:stupid by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The other important difference is geography. Yes, there are wild cats that are pretty close to our domesticated cats, but they don't live in Oregon, they live in Europe; in Oregon, or Australia, they'd be considered an "invasive species".

      Barn cats aren't wild either, because barns aren't natural habitats in the least. Cows aren't "wild animals" either, but they don't live inside with people either, they live on farms (which frequently also have barns, though cows don't normally live there, but horses do, and again aren't wild).

    5. Re:stupid by Anarchduke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      he's bored?

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    6. Re:stupid by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Usually, when someone says "cat", they mean felis domesticus, not a mountain lion (same thing as cougar). If they meant a mountain lion, they would have specified that.

      Besides, what kind of moron would try to get a dead mouse (or anything for that matter) away from a mountain lion? Obviously, this case was about a housecat.

      Finally, I live in Arizona. We have mountain lions here too, though not generally in the city. Mountain lions live all over the western US, they're not unique to Oregon. I think they had some problems with them pouncing on bicyclists in southern California too a while back.

    7. Re:stupid by maharvey · · Score: 1

      Also lynx and bobcats, which are definitely wild.

    8. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I don't think geography is that important. An invasive species would continue acting like it used to if it were transported home, after all.

      The trick with barn cats is that our relationship with them isn't nearly as exploitative as it is with, say, cows. For thousands of years, humans' relationship to cats was nothing more than "I will feed and shelter you just for existing (and eating mice), as long as you remain in the vicinity of my home." We never really asked them to change their instincts, and we barely control their reproduction; we just plug in to their minds as some kind of vaguely-defined maternal figure, and they're saved the trouble of finding somewhere new to hide during the day. Stray cats are pretty much completely unmodified, and even have all of the natural territorial habits found in the sand cat.

      Have you ever seen a fancier's pedigree cat, like a Japanese bobtail? They're a perfect example of the difference between the average feline and the results of the pet typical domestication process. They're much more sociable, and essentially incapable of surviving as a feral species. In fact I would argue that an animal's ability to revert to feral behaviour in only a generation or two pretty much defines whether or not it's truly domesticated, because otherwise it's (probably) just a transient behavioural change. By this definition, humans may not be fully domesticated either.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    9. Re:stupid by PNutts · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Girls Gone Feral" doesn't have the same ring to it, but sounds interesting for the same reasons.

    10. Re:stupid by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Um....

    11. Re:stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you over-estimate the effects of "domestication" on dogs... although I do admit that many of them have had the piss bred out of them. Pocket dogs are an abomination.

      But for most of human history, dogs were working animals, too. The only difference is that they are (usually) too big to be allowed to gather their own food. That would be dangerous (and inconvenient, considering that they are pack hunters). That is the difference: practicality, not biology.

      Dogs do go feral. In an area not very far from here there has been a pack of feral dogs, descended from escaped domestic dogs, roaming the mountains for at least 30 years. They have been spotted every few years (it is a very remote place and rough country) but their fate is uncertain now that the wolves have returned. And Dingos are of course another example of formerly-domesticated dogs returning to the wild.

      Another interesting example is the domestic ferret. Evidence indicates that they have been domesticated for approximately as long as dogs and cats. And again, for most of human history they were working animals: they were (and still are) used to hunt small game. Not only that, but prior to WWII, right here in the United States, ferrets were also popular farm animals, used for keeping rats, mice, etc. out of the granaries just like cats.

      But unlike both dogs and cats, and except in New Zealand (which presented very specific and unusual conditions), ferrets don't go feral. They just don't. It doesn't happen.

    12. Re:stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "'Girls Gone Feral' doesn't have the same ring to it, but sounds interesting for the same reasons."

      I like it. I think I'll keep it.

    13. Re:stupid by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      "Girls Gone Feral" doesn't have the same ring to it, but sounds interesting for the same reasons.

      Just don't try to put your mouse in their mouth

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    14. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Alright. Neat; thanks. I've always been more of a cat person and have never really understood the temperaments of dog breeds that well. In a way, though, this underscores my original point, that we're fooled by behavioural changes into assuming that animals have changed drastically due to domestication. (I still maintain, though, that cats are generally much less trained than dogs. There are also very few breeds that fit into the 'pocket dog' equivalent, mostly notably the Japanese Bobtail.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    15. Re:stupid by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, those are probably the cat that housecats descended from (it says so in the article). However, it's still a different species. There's no African Wildcats in Oregon; the map clearly indicates they only exist in Africa, Europe, and Asia.

    16. Re:stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "In a way, though, this underscores my original point, that we're fooled by behavioural changes into assuming that animals have changed drastically due to domestication."

      Yes, I agree. No argument here. I would illustrate with an example from my own pet, but that would be giving away too much personal information for Slashdot. Some of the people here are, to be blunt, not very nice.

    17. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I know that feeling.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    18. Re:stupid by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      but the most important alterations are purely in how the animal has been raised.

      The link you pointed to refutes your point. The difference in the foxes' behavior was entirely due to selective breeding, not how they were raised. The scientists showed that if fox cubs that were bred for aggression were placed with a non-aggressive foster mother, they were still highly aggressive and also vice-versa.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    19. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      You're right; that looks pretty lousy in retrospect. I think I was trying to make my argument about "cats are not super-domesticated, but canines are" and it came out wrong.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    20. Re:stupid by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Mountain lions have been spotted in New England. It's not unreasonable to assume they'll be in all the contiguous states within 20 years or so.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    21. Re:stupid by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I was hoping I'd find a story about cougars attacking mountain bikers, behind that link. I used to do MTB/XC and wanted to share the story with a few friends.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    22. Re:stupid by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      A wolf, or a dingo are wild dogs. The offspring of an abandoned poodle is likely to be feral, not wild.

    23. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      All feral animals are considered wild. The term has no special biological meaning.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    24. Re:stupid by bungo · · Score: 1

      Some of the people here are, to be blunt, not very nice.

      Welcome to Slashdot!

      You know, it wasn't always like this. I've been around since before the time that accounts were created (I held off creating an account, like a lot of other people, since I didn't like the idea of logging in to read a website, times have changed). I think things started to change for the worse after Rob Malda sold the site and it was bought (for the first time) and people starting coming here because it was 'cool', and then a flood of juvenile people turned up.

      It sort of reminds me of the never ending September with Usenet. (I was on Usenet back since 1986, probably before most people here were even born.) Before that September, Usenet was a 'small', friendly community, made up of mostly university types and large companies.

      Where was I?... Ah, yes, well, we used to hitch an onion to our belt, as that was the fashion at the time ....
       

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    25. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      You're a step behind, I'm afraid. Because it may not be the case that a domesticated lineage actually underwent genetic change (relevant or otherwise), it cannot be guaranteed that an organism that meets the zoological definition of feralness is genetically distinct from a specimen that has never been domesticated.

      I suppose we're arguing the semantics of the term "biological meaning" at this point, since "meaning" implies that we're discussing the field of biology as it is studied, rather than natural fact. Let me rephrase to say "no biological significance."

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    26. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ...significance is also an imperfect word. "Does not necessarily have a biological basis" sounds better.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    27. Re:stupid by shadesOG · · Score: 1

      I was hoping I'd find a story about cougars attacking mountain bikers, behind that link. I used to do MTB/XC and wanted to share the story with a few friends.

      This was in California. http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/West/01/09/mountain.lion/index.html I couldn't find a local one.

    28. Re:stupid by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Well, there is also felis silvestris, which is by the very definition a wild cat, but you wouldn't tell it from a domestic one. Doesn't live in the States, though (except maybe at some zoo).

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    29. Re:stupid by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I think that speaks volumes about how little we appreciate the educability of animals. They have culture just as much as we do; we've just taken it for granted for most of human history that their behaviours are all instinctual. If you're interested in similar peculiar anecdotes, try Googling "avian intelligence" sometime. It's amazing what we've been able to learn about parrots, pigeons and corvids through controlled experiments.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    30. Re:stupid by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Interesting news nonetheless. Thank you.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  3. Bring out your dead! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    While an exciting headline, certain to raise the blood pressure of the angst brigade, this isn't terribly newsworthy. Bubonic plague has been found in animals (mostly prairie dogs in Colorado) for decades and apparently is the sixth case of plague in Oregon since 1995. It's easy to treat with antibiotics. The hardest part is actually thinking that Yersinia pestis is the causative organism.

    Bonus points for Monty Python addicts.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Bring out your dead! by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Rare, but still around. House MD had a case that turned out to be the Black Death caught from an adopted pet from Arizona about five years ago. Even rarer than lupus, and as you all know, "It's never lupus!"

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    2. Re:Bring out your dead! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Bubonic plague has been found in animals (mostly prairie dogs in Colorado) for decades and apparently is the sixth case of plague in Oregon since 1995.

      From TFA:

      Health officials in Portland have confirmed that a man contracted the plague...

      Hmm... I KNEW there was something that the Portlandia folks left out when they said, "The dream of the 90s is alive in Portland...."

      Clown school, double-decker bicycles, and of course... bubonic plague.

      (P.S. Yes, I know this case of plague didn't originate in Portland... but neither did clown school, and clowning is apparently still going on there. Elsewhere, plague is so 1390s...)

    3. Re:Bring out your dead! by aliquis · · Score: 2

      How sure are they it's the same?

      Seem legit:
      http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/352856/20120615/octomom-2-woman-pregnant-mouth-eating-squid.htm
      "'Octomom' 2.0? Woman Gets 'Pregnant In The Mouth' After Eating Squid
      By Dave Smith: Subscribe to Dave's RSS feed
      June 15, 2012 5:01 PM EDT
      A 63-year-old South Korean woman was shocked to learn she "became pregnant" with 12 baby squid after eating a portion of calamari."

      Seem too good to be true, but it probably is.

    4. Re:Bring out your dead! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's pretty common throughout the western US (at least). Several years ago, some friends and I went camping at a California State Park, and were perplexed to see signs posted saying that there was risk of bubonic plague. We asked a ranger, who basically told us it was no big deal, and not all that unusual. They weren't even bothing to send campers home. It did make the night feel a little spookier, somehow. :)

      Calling it "The Black Death" in this day and age borders on histrionics (though I admit it's historically accurate).

    5. Re:Bring out your dead! by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Human infections are relatively rare, but yeah, I've heard of other cases as well. Certainly not the killer it once was, much like tetanus, which many people still think can only be contracted from rusty nails, while the bacterium is dirt dwelling and can be contrived from any puncture wound. Heck, people have contracted it from dirty heroin needles.

    6. Re:Bring out your dead! by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      It is only easy to treat if it's been caught early which it typically is. This poor guy waited a little too long.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    7. Re:Bring out your dead! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are 3 essential forms of Black Plague (all of them caused by the same organism), and each of them varies in the rapidity of onset.

      The most virulent is the pneumonic form. It can kill within days. But it is also relatively rare, even as cases of plague go. Usually it takes somewhat longer.

    8. Re:Bring out your dead! by starworks5 · · Score: 1
  4. Biggest question... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Informative
    Why was this guy trying to pry a mouse away from a cat? That appears to be the most interesting story here...

    Really though, from TFA:

    it is treatable with antibiotics

    the bacteria thrives in forests, grasslands and any wooded areas inhabited by rats and squirrels

    Without the help of modern medicine, Europeans in the Middle Ages could do little to combat the plague.

    So this is a bacterium that is common in the wild, which can be contracted by humans but is treatable with modern medicine. It is not as though we are facing another plague here...

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Biggest question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good thing that bacteria cant become resistant to antibiotics, right?

      captcha: evasion

    2. Re:Biggest question... by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1
      Also:

      there are about seven cases of the Black Plague in the U.S. each year

    3. Re:Biggest question... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Good thing that bacteria cant become resistant to antibiotics, right?

      Bacteria that spread from human to human can evolve antibiotic resistance relatively quickly. Bacteria that spread primarily from animal to animal, especially if those animals are wild, are much less likely to evolve resistance. I don't think we are going to start giving antibiotics to prairie dogs.

       

    4. Re:Biggest question... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      Good thing that bacteria cant become resistant to antibiotics, right?

      Sure, but there is more to keep in mind when it comes to this particular infection:

      1. Cleanliness slows the spread immensely, especially around areas where the bacteria live. One of the main reasons for the plague's spread in the middle ages was poor hygiene, as evidenced by the reduced rates of infection in communities where bathing and washing hands were common.
      2. We do not leave dead animal carcasses rotting in our streets. One of the ways this infection spreads is by fleas jumping from a dead animal to a live one.
      3. We have quarantine protocols for serious diseases, which help reduce contact between infected and uninfected people.

      So even if by some strange twist, the plague were to develop resistance to antibiotics, it would be unlikely to become an epidemic. Indeed, only a tiny handful of people become infected in modern times, and that is despite the fact that we have much larger populations and higher population densities.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:Biggest question... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      You are right. Bacteria can't become resistant to antibiotics. What happened with MSSA and such is that the resistant strains already existed, and the widespread and often inappropriate usage of antibiotics killed of the other strains, making MSSA more common. But the antibiotics didn't "create" MSSA, and and the bacteria didn't "become" resistant, but had been that way for longer than we have records.

    6. Re:Biggest question... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      This is possibly the worst infection to evolve

      Really, the worst? This is an infection that is not hard to control with quarantines, good hygiene and good sanitation -- none of which are a challenge in this century. It would be a pretty serious leap for the plague to evade all of the above.

      We have better medicine

      More importantly, we have better medical practices. Doctors wash their hands between seeing patients. Highly infectious patients are kept under special quarantines. Corpses are not handled without gloves. Medical instruments are carefully disposed of. These things are more relevant to the plague than antibiotics, which are just a treatment for those who become infected.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    7. Re:Biggest question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, we just give antibiotics to our farm animals, then let them get hunted by the wild animals....

    8. Re:Biggest question... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I don't think we are going to start giving antibiotics to prairie dogs.

      Only because they are apparently not that tasty. If they were in a sandwich from McDonald's you would see farms of them with antibiotics in their food.

    9. Re:Biggest question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wrong. Bacteria absolutely can become resistant to antibiotics. Scientists have recreated this phenomenon countless times in the lab. Now whether MRSA pre-existed the use of modern antibiotics, I don't know. Maybe you're right.

      Of course, we're both playing fast-and-loose with terminology. By create, of course, I presume we're both referring to the evolutionary mechanism of selective pressure.

    10. Re:Biggest question... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Only because they are apparently not that tasty."

      Except to black-footed ferrets. Prairie dogs are their primary diet.

    11. Re:Biggest question... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We do not leave dead animal carcasses rotting in our streets. One of the ways this infection spreads is by fleas jumping from a dead animal to a live one.

      Heh heh. You haven't been to Lake County, California. Especially on the streets and roads that approach my road, there are often dead animal carcasses, up to and including deer. They do tend to clear them out right in town, though. However, Animal Control will no longer come to pick up animals that just drop dead on private property, you have to deal with that yourself. Not making this up... you'd think they'd want to check out an animal like that. Had a long conversation with a guy whose dog likes to go after skunks and kill them, some animals are just on a mission or something. But he got bit by one so he called animal control and they never came to get this thing for so long that a test would be meaningless. Then some weeks later they told him they wanted to destroy his dog because the skunk might have been rabid. So don't take it as a given that we give a shit about whether animals might be spreading disease; our officials always have the option of operating in cover-up mode.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Bring out yer dead! by howardd21 · · Score: 2

    Obligatory Monthy Python Reference http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grbSQ6O6kbs "I'm not dead yet"

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Bring out yer dead! by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Firesign Theatre reference: "According to my careful prosthesis, this man has - The Plague." (from Waiting for the Electrician or Someone Like Him)

  6. This is hardly news. by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bubonic plague has been endemic (sustaining itself permanently, in this case in the animal population) in the western part of the US for years, although it is news to public health officials when a human contracts it. There was a case two years ago, also in Oregon.

    The reason it doesn't sweep the nation the way it swept Europe is advances in hygiene, public health and medical treatment. Rats and fleas in the house aren't unheard of these days, but they're no longer universal. If people are getting bit by fleas they'll call the exterminator or the board of health; they won't just accept it as a fact of life. If they contract plague they'll go to the doctor who will cure it relatively easily.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:This is hardly news. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Bubonic plague has been endemic (sustaining itself permanently, in this case in the animal population) in the western part of the US for yeas...

      Yep. When I was in the US southwest in the 80's they were handing out phamplets at the national parks like the grand canyon(I think I have mine tucked away somewhere still--I was a kid and thought it was kinda cool) to avoid dead animals. This really isn't news, we see a dozen or so cases of it in Canada every year from the same way.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:This is hardly news. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      This really isn't news, we see a dozen or so cases of it in Canada every year from the same way.

      I didn't realize it was a common thing for people to pry dead mice from the mouths of stray cats. ;)

    3. Re:This is hardly news. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Cue the dirty is better theorists.

      "If we let the kids play on dirt floors in a filthy home without any disinfectants or vaccinations the would be healthier".

      Ignore the fact that historically half of all children died before age 5.

    4. Re:This is hardly news. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize it was a common thing for people to pry dead mice from the mouths of stray cats. ;)

      You'd be surprised, there's warnings put in newspapers, local flyers and on the TV in metro centres here, for the city folk not to do this stuff. It might seem stupid if you've ever lived in the country, it's kinda like "where does hamburger come from" obviously the store.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:This is hardly news. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I have yet to encounter a "dirty is better" theorist who is also an anti-vaccer, considering vaccines perform the same function as playing around in the dirt: introducing the immune system to the bad guys, so it knows what they look like and how to kill them.

      Besides, generally the argument is hardly to keep the house filthy, but against sterilizing everything and anything and preventing children from playing outside.

      Washing your hands after using the bathroom and before preparing food is good. Sterilizing them every time one touches a door-handle is over the top.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    6. Re:This is hardly news. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Cue the dirty is better theorists.

      "If we let the kids play on dirt floors in a filthy home without any disinfectants or vaccinations the would be healthier".

      Ignore the fact that historically half of all children died before age 5.

      Selection biases are great. We still get that from some of the older generation "When we were kids we used to ride around in cars without seatbelts and child restraints and we turned out just fine". Sure you did... the ones of you who lived mostly turned out just fine.

    7. Re:This is hardly news. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I have encountered such people in various Slashdot discussions on vaccination.

      The fact is that anti-vaxers will put forth pretty much anything as a justification for their position.

    8. Re:This is hardly news. by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      There are old studies about why russian officers suffered more from the plague than their soldiers eating molded bread.

  7. Re:The Plague by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    True, many of the hiking trails in New Mexico have signs warning that rodents may be carrying the plague. What surprises me, though, is the man is in critical condition. I thought the plague was easily treatable with antibiotics today. Is this a new antibiotic resistant strain?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  8. Re:2012 strikes again by isopropanol · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, must be confirmation bias on your part.

    Black Plague is rare, but still happens you just usually don't hear about it because it's treatable with antibiotics and preventable by controlling rodent populations - neither antibiotic treatment nor effective prevention were known in europe during the middle ages.

  9. Time to get vaccinated by alen · · Score: 1

    Ive had mine in the army. I'm not worried

    1. Re:Time to get vaccinated by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Ive had mine in the army. I'm not worried

      Vaccination improves resistance in the aggregate over the entire population that receives vaccination; in other words there is less likelihood of an epidemic, but it is still very possible for normal individuals to catch the disease if exposed.

      So you are at less risk, in case an outbreak of the most common strains the vaccine was designed against, but you would still be at significantly high risk in case of an epidemic, unless the rest of the population of people and animals you interact with (or rather, that fleas in your area interact with) were vaccinated as well.

  10. Re:The Plague by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    True, many of the hiking trails in New Mexico have signs warning that rodents may be carrying the plague. What surprises me, though, is the man is in critical condition. I thought the plague was easily treatable with antibiotics today. Is this a new antibiotic resistant strain?

    Treatable when caught early.

  11. Obligatory LOLcat ref by thatseattleguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can has worldwide pandemic?

    1. Re:Obligatory LOLcat ref by equex · · Score: 5, Informative

      haz

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
    2. Re:Obligatory LOLcat ref by xstonedogx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a beautiful world we live in when we have a second spelling and dialect for what we imagine our domesticated companions are telling us... and there are spelling and grammar nazis for that dialect.

    3. Re:Obligatory LOLcat ref by jamesh · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't already posted you'd be the first spelling/grammar nazi I would _ever_ have moderated up!

    4. Re:Obligatory LOLcat ref by thatseattleguy · · Score: 1

      Original "has": http://icanhascheezburger.com/2007/01/11/i-can-has-cheezburger-3/

      "Haz" would have been way funnier here, though.

      "I CAN BE HAZ MAT?!"

    5. Re:Obligatory LOLcat ref by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      LUL ^_^

    6. Re:Obligatory LOLcat ref by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      we have a second spelling and dialect for what we imagine our domesticated companions are telling us... and there are spelling and grammar nazis for that dialect.

      They look like this

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Obligatory LOLcat ref by equex · · Score: 1

      lol, I actually remembered wrong and the original cheeseburger cat is with an 's', but as you say, there are more dialects, especially around IRC and some popular forums, they use 'z' more.

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
  12. Plague?!? by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

    that is all.

    Oh wait, anyone else ever know that putting something like 'PPPPPLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAGUE?!?" as a comment subject produces a "filter error: Too much repetition". Isn't it reasonable to expect that a mature person who can operate a computer and engage in discussion groups well aware enough of what constitutes too much or too little repetition?

    Because I can clearly say it in the message body, just not the subject. Yet, its exactly what I wanted the subject to be!

    1. Re:Plague?!? by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      It is reasonable to expect it, yes. But it is also reasonable to expect that the immature id10t's on this board will abuse the priviledge to post that sort of crud, so society here forbids it from being possible in the first place.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    2. Re:Plague?!? by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      And yet it happened anyhow, in one form or another. Is it too much to ask that I be allowed to use my own definition for excessive repetition? After all, I'm not trying to force it on someone else, yet someone elses definition of repetition is now forced on me, yet only in the comment subject area. Its sort of like saying "Yes, you can protest, but only in this small area over here where nobody can see you", isnt it?

  13. Re:The Plague by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Yep, it was a 50-year-old men. People in that demographic are infamous for avoiding medical treatment until it's too late.

  14. Sensationalized article by tirerim · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, he contracted septicaemic plague, the blood-borne form of Yersinia pestis. That doesn't mean he contracted "the Black Death". The Black Death was almost certainly caused by a variant of Y. pestis which is no longer around (microorganisms tend to change a bit over the course of a few centuries). It's also the name of a specific pandemic of plague, and while there were other smaller outbreaks in the following centuries, they weren't generally referred to by that name. One human case of a disease that is now treatable with antibiotics and easy to contain does not make for a pandemic.

    1. Re:Sensationalized article by Prune · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are wrong. Black Death DNA was extracted from teeth of victims in the Tower of London and it's the same Y. pestis as we have today: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/science/13plague.html?_r=1

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    2. Re:Sensationalized article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the article, you'd find that it's not conclusive. It is true that it shows that Y. pestis seems to be the causative agent of Black Death, but the Y. Pestis found on those victims does differ from the modern day strains. It doesn't differ by much, which suggests that genetic differences probably aren't the cause for the different infection rates and symptoms, but they're not yet sure and are investigating the differences one-by-one to find out. The article also says that the scientists also failed to get the correct ordering of genes within the bacterium's chromosome (because they had only fragments to work with), and the gene ordering might affect pathogenicity.

    3. Re:Sensationalized article by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Yes, he contracted septicaemic plague, the blood-borne form of Yersinia pestis."

      You are confusing different forms of the disease with different forms of an organism. There are 3 known basic types of Plague, all caused by the same organism.

    4. Re:Sensationalized article by tirerim · · Score: 1

      That article says that the recovered genome is "remarkably similar to that of the present-day bacterium". Note that it does not say "identical". It also says, "The changes in the genome will be studied one by one to see how each affects the microbe’s virulence." So there have definitely been changes, and the jury is still out on whether they are significant.

    5. Re:Sensationalized article by Nimloth · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Sensationalized article by Prune · · Score: 1

      At your age, you should know better than to still be quoting a comic that's become lamer and shittier over the years, and wasn't even all that good to start with. It's become a cliche of pseudo-nerd culture.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  15. Re:2012 strikes again by AikonMGB · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wrong, it's a new zombie strain, carried by rodents and cats from Japan; I suspect it is entirely distinct from the zombie strain seen in Florida, originating in Cuba.

  16. Re:Boo to story submitter by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    You forgot to add "and get off my lawn!"

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  17. Re:2012 strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A professor once told us, "It's around, and yes, occasionally kills someone. You just see, 'person died of severe bacterial infection'."

  18. Not a big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Exactly this. In the Southwestern US there is a case of plague every couple of years. Not a big deal unless it isn't diagnosed and treated rapidly. It probably shows up in other areas of the world as well.

    1. Re:Not a big deal. by dpilot · · Score: 3, Informative

      My brother-in-law is a veterinarian in southeast Utah, and he found one of those "every few years" cases of bubonic plague a few years back. He told me the same thing - a case pops up every few years.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Not a big deal. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      It does, from anecdotal reports I've read, India seems to be the place to go for a dose of the plague. Unlike smallpox (and soon Polio), it's doubtfull that it will ever be eradicated with current methods since it's normally transmitted by fleas, but we do know how to control it when it pops up so yeah, a repeat of the black death is highly unlikely. Pathogeans that turn into pandemics with a high mortality rate are rare, from an evolutionary POV it doesn't make sense to kill off your host and worse still if you kill your host too quickly (eg:Ebola) you have very limited opportunities to spread to new hosts. Smallpox (the biblical plague) and polio only occur in humans, 'simply' cure every last human case on the planet and they are gone for ever. Coincidently India is also one of the last places on the planet where polio still occurs, mainly due to local religious beliefs. That in itself is an fantastic achivement (I can recall going to school with several polio victims in the 60's, they were the lucky ones, they could still waddle around without a wheel chair. ).

      However there's an interesting moral conundrum with smallpox; As an achivement for all mankind the erradication of smallpox is right up there with the moon landing, and was a far more practical and noble use of our resources. It was made possible because a healthy 8yo boy was afforded all the rights of a lab rat by the man who discovered the vaccine. Yes it was a different planet in the 18th century, but the conundrum is timeless and can be expressed in star trek terms as - does "the good of the many outweigh the good of the few, or the one"?

      Once we have an answer to that connundrum we can decide whether or not the few pockets of anti-vaccine nutters should be forceably innoculated for certain communicable diseses. There existance provides a breeding ground from where new strains can evolve and launch themselves into the general population (re: recent whooping cough outbreaks in Australia). Fuck it, what am I saying? Unlike Jensen we KNOW modern vaccines work and we KNOW how to develop them without using humans as lab rats, I say round the ignorant fucker's up and jab 'em.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Not a big deal. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      /s "There existance", "Their existance"

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Not a big deal. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      They plain have plague warnings at the campgrounds in southern Utah. This stuff is by no means new. It's just relatively rare and pretty localized. It's unusual enough that it fits into the "man bites dog" category of the news. No one remembers that it happened before 5 or 10 or 15 years ago and nothing came of it then either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Not a big deal. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The question of whether "the good of the many outweigh the good of the few, or the one" is unrelated to forced inoculation, because it is good for those inoculated and everybody else.

      Once cannibalism and other leftist ideologies are rejected, there are very few cases where "the good of the many" is opposed to "the good of the few".

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:Not a big deal. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Aren't you a clever little tea bagger, you got my point.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  19. Pretty Common Out West by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    They keep finding plague in the prairie dog colonies out here. They do a news story about it every couple years. It's not really anything to get worked up about, unless you're doing something you shouldn't have been doing in the first place. Like messing with stray cats. Or maybe letting your dog run around in the prairie dog fields...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  20. Not surprising by hattable · · Score: 1

    that the end of our civilization will start in Portland. Take a bath you hipsters!

    --
    OMG facts!
  21. Re:2012 strikes again by f3rret · · Score: 1

    Yeah plague isn't really uncommon, there are still areas of Russia and Africa and other countries [citation needed] where plague is still a problem, mostly for livestock.

    It wont really turn into the black death again, since we now have stuff like proper hygiene and antibiotics. Of course it could have been one of those super plagues the Soviets were designing that somehow got out, if that was the case commence you panicking now.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  22. Re:Black Death? no, epidemiology guesses Ebola lik by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, epidemiology is entirely unsure about the matter. (Also, don't anthropomorphize inanimate objects, they hate it when you do that.)

    Some people think it was the bubonic plague because that matches _some_ of the symptoms reported at the time and y. pestis has been found in mass graves from the period. (Obviously people who disagree are pulling out the "correlation does not equal causation" card.)

    Other people believe it was ebola, anthrax, or something else because the incubation period, the rate and nature of the spread, and some of the symptoms don't match those of the modern bubonic plague.

    Some people believe it was the y. pestis, but it behaved differently back then because humans had zero immunity when it was introduced, and both humans and the bacteria have had a few centuries to evolve since then.

    And some people believe that it wasn't just one disease that was responsible for the black death but a number of different diseases sweeping through around the same time. They didn't know much about disease at the time, and if everyone has heard of the black death and a bunch of people get sick and die, everyone is going to blame it on the black death.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  23. Doctors aren't curing him by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    They've taken bets on how many days he's going to stay alive.

    Come on! The guy has no insurance!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  24. bring out your dead! by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    "I'm not dead!"

  25. Re:The Plague by Nyder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yep, it was a 50-year-old men. People in that demographic are infamous for avoiding medical treatment until it's too late.

    That is because by the time we are that old, we know that most doctors don't actually know as much as they think (meaning they tend to guess alot), and don't want to pay the high price for that.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  26. Re:Black Death? no, epidemiology guesses Ebola lik by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Also, as a bonus, Seanan McGuire has an amusing "teaching song" about the Black Death which briefly covers a lot of the objections to the y. pestis theory. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be one of the songs with a performance on YouTube, though you can hear a brief clip of it on CDBaby.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  27. Re:2012 strikes again by ArcherB · · Score: 1

    Wrong, it's a new zombie strain, carried by rodents and cats from Japan; I suspect it is entirely distinct from the zombie strain seen in Florida, originating in Cuba.

    You may be on to something:

    Portland police shorten hours at Laurelhurst Park after reports of group of teen boys attacking others

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  28. Re:Boo to story submitter by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    Well, I've got an SDID that is a thousand times smaller, and I agree with the OP. This is barely news, let alone news for nerds. The bubonic plague is not-uncommon among the west coast's rodent population, and is easily treatable, and there's nothing particularly nerdy going on here.

  29. Re:2012 strikes again by mysidia · · Score: 1, Interesting

    neither antibiotic treatment nor effective prevention were known in europe during the middle ages.

    Neither were there pervasive antibiotic resistant bacteria. Today it is "treatable with antibiotics"; but we cannot rely on there not being new strains that are resistant to antibiotics.

  30. Re:The Plague by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I can survive with the Plague for another 15 years and get on medicare"

  31. Re:The Plague by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

    Even back in the Ye Olden Days when the plague was rampant there was strains / variations that where a lot more virulent. If you caught the strain that was the one that rapidly progressed to septicemic plague you where toast in hours to 1-2 days.

    --
    To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  32. Non story by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are 1-2 cases of bubonic plague in the US every year. "Yersenia pestis" is part of the normal body flora of several animals, especially underneath the nails of the armadillo. Now when we see cipro resistant plague, then you can panic.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Non story by Prune · · Score: 1

      >Now when we see cipro resistant plague, then you can panic.

      No doubt it's on it's way. Tuberculosis has been steadily growing in resistance, and there have been cases of TB now resistant to all antibiotics that were tried. And just recently, gonorrhea is also becoming multi-drug resistant: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/06/06/drug-resistant-gonorrhea-spreading-says-world-health-organization/

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    2. Re:Non story by dkf · · Score: 1

      No doubt it's on it's way. Tuberculosis has been steadily growing in resistance, and there have been cases of TB now resistant to all antibiotics that were tried. And just recently, gonorrhea is also becoming multi-drug resistant

      But there's no selection pressure on plague to become resistant. It's happily sitting in its wild reservoir, unexposed to antibiotics, and only very rarely jumps to humans (and when it does jump, it doesn't propagate far; transmission between people is very rare these days). Given that, while it is possible for a drug resistant version to evolve and become an epidemic strain, it's really unlikely and will continue to be so until some idiot farmer decides to dose all the rodents on his land with "growth promoters" on a long-term basis. I'd find something else to worry about instead, something more likely...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:Non story by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Rodent overlords!

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  33. I would pry a dead mouse from the cat too. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    You now a days all the mouse manufacturers have switched to USB. Those with the old serial green connector that looks like S-video connector are quite rare, and many people are fond of them, even if they are totally dead and it is unlikely for them to become valuable again. So, yeah, if a cat tries swallow it, I would pry it from its mouth too.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:I would pry a dead mouse from the cat too. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      You now a days all the mouse manufacturers have switched to USB. Those with the old serial green connector that looks like S-video connector are quite rare

      The green ones that look like S-video connectors are definitely not serial* in the sense of RS232, they are called PS/2 ports. Yes, I think I still have a real serial mouse somewhere around here, although not a 25-pin one like god intended, only this newfangled 9-pin variant. Plus I still use RS232 for hacking on FPGAs, although often TTL voltage levels instead of the real thing.

      *As far as the pin count goes, all of USB, PS/2 and RS232 are serial. But only one of these is called the serial port.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  34. Re:2012 strikes again by Kidipede · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One big cause of plagues in the Middle Ages was therefore situations that caused huge increases in the rodent population. This happened whenever there were food shortages, because people would stop being able to spare food to feed dogs and cats. When you stop feeding your dog, pretty soon you have to kill it (and then you may as well eat it). Without dogs and cats around, the rat population would take off. That's why in famines, as soon as people get done eating dogs and cats they start to eat rats. But of course the combination of lots of rats with underfed, weakened people means that plague can kill a lot of people. Indeed, the worse food security you had in your town, the more people tended to die of plague.

  35. Re:2012 strikes again by Caledfwlch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually they did have rodent population control in those days, but it's effectiveness was severely curtailed as they associated cats with witchcraft and so went around killing them. An enlightening glimpse of how perpetuating a climate of fear with no sound basis can backfire!

    --
    These views express my own personal opinions, not those of the other voices in my head
  36. Re:2012 strikes again by dpilot · · Score: 2

    That may happen, but antibiotic resistance usually happens because of overprescription, and people not following directions. Since there aren't many cases of Plague, pretty much any time it does pop up, those people are under careful care, so if there is any antibiotic resistance to it, it's probably because of "environmental antibiotics" - pets under treatment peeing excess, same for farm animals, leaching landfills, etc.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  37. More than that... by bashibazouk · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the linked article:

    Even though there are about seven cases of the Black Plague in the U.S. each year, most cases have been in the West and the Southweset, the bacterium is considerably less fatal than it once was. According to the CDC, 1 in 7 cases are fatal, but the disease can now be treated with antibiotics.

    I know, I know I'm not supposed to read the article...

    1. Re:More than that... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      when you think about it, its pretty crazy to think that something that once wiped out over 1/3rd of the human population can be treated so easily. Really makes you wonder what we will do about the next "black death"

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:More than that... by equex · · Score: 1

      The next black death will be something that escapes one of those labs where they toy around with black death and anthrax every day.

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
    3. Re:More than that... by burne · · Score: 1

      You don't need to back that far. We have general vaccinations over here. Before that one or two out of every ten kids would die of diphtheria. One in a hundred would end up severely paralysed by poliomyelitis. We haven't seen a single case of diphtheria in thirty years, and poliomyelitis-epidemics are restricted to the bible-belters.

      That's just sixty years ago. My mother (born in the thirties) lost a brother to diphtheria, so that era is still in living memory.

    4. Re:More than that... by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      More likely it will be some variant of the common flu, dispersed by air line passengers so that there are multiple points of origin.

      Think about that the next time you are cooped up with a couple hundred other passengers at 30,000 feet and somebody sneezes.

      --
      Will
    5. Re:More than that... by mha · · Score: 1

      As far as I remember from a book I read - I believe it was "Survival of the Sickest" (http://www.amazon.com/Survival-Sickest-Surprising-Connections-Longevity/dp/0060889667/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1340023923&sr=1-1&keywords=survival+of+the+sickest), but I'm not certain, I read so much - the explanation is: evolutionary selection. There where several waves of the plague in old Europe, and each subsequent one was less disastrous than the preceding one. The reason is selective pressure, those who survived were more likely to have genes that had to do with how iron is retained in the body. If I remember correctly the bad feature of the plague was (is) that they circumvent the body's immune system: the white cells do what they usually do, the grab the invader, but in this case that's just what they want: they use the iron reserves stored inside the white cells for their own proliferation.
      The gene variant that survived tended to remove the iron from the reach of the plague.

      So today the (European? not sure about others) population would be expected to be much more resistant to the plague.

      Same as many Africans are MUCH more resistant to malaria than Europeans. A table from the 1870s I saw recently showed that of 1000 Europeans more than 500 died within a year(!!!) in malaria countries, while only 70-something Africans died in the same period.

    6. Re:More than that... by mha · · Score: 1
  38. Re:2012 strikes again by morcego · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No, must be confirmation bias on your part.

    Black Plague is rare, but still happens you just usually don't hear about it because it's treatable with antibiotics and preventable by controlling rodent populations - neither antibiotic treatment nor effective prevention were known in europe during the middle ages.

    I'm not sure you are entirely correct. The Black Plague is a particular stain of bubonic disease, or at least a group of stains. Although the bubonic disease is still around (and easily treatable), it is not the same stain. One would expect this news is regarding a different stain than was we "usually" see these days. Otherwise, why would be it news worthy ?

    --
    morcego
  39. Re:2012 strikes again by rve · · Score: 2

    That may happen, but antibiotic resistance usually happens because of overprescription, and people not following directions. Since there aren't many cases of Plague, pretty much any time it does pop up, those people are under careful care, so if there is any antibiotic resistance to it, it's probably because of "environmental antibiotics" - pets under treatment peeing excess, same for farm animals, leaching landfills, etc.

    Antibiotic resistance usually happens because of the widespread use of sub therapeutic doses of antibiotics as a 'growth enhancer' in animal feed, and the ability of bacteria to exchange genes, even between different species of bacteria. A fairly recent example of this behavior is the EHEC strain, a strain of previously harmles e.coli bacteria that seems to have absorbed the gene for producing a deadly toxin from the dysentery bug.

  40. I can haz bubonik plaguez? by starworks5 · · Score: 1

    I can haz bubonik plaguez? http://lh5.ggpht.com/_3iv5LGzCFf4/SdUvJpZF39I/AAAAAAAAB5s/eY-hdDrHU9I/bubonic.jpg

  41. Well, the world is supposed to end this year by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Or did I miss a memo? :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  42. Re:The same axiom applies. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I have no fear. I know if I don't use it then I can't be hurt by it. What it does to you is of course your business. I'm sure the effects aren't all that beneficial. I've seen plenty of pot heads and it was enough for me to pass on the experience.

  43. Re:2012 strikes again by bitingduck · · Score: 1

    Black Plague is rare, but still happens you just usually don't hear about it because it's treatable with antibiotics and preventable by controlling rodent populations

    I live on the edge of a national forest at the "urban/forest interface". Every once in a while there will be a report of Y. Pestis (aka "The Plague") in squirrels or something in the park nearby (it's a nature center that leads into the forest). I don't recall any cases where it was transmitted to people. Even if it were relatively common, there are far more dangerous things in the forest, even right here at the developed edge. Most Saturdays in the summer seem to bring a lot of helicopter traffic over the house, as the sheriffs fly back and forth plucking people off of a dangerous climb that leads to the second of many small waterfalls. A couple people died there last year, and already this month I think there have been two major falls of ~150+ feet. Both survived, but with pretty serious injuries. Plague is a lot easier to deal with.

  44. 1-2 cases? Nobody agrees... by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    You say 1-2 cases, and the article, in two different places, says 7 cases per year and 10-15 cases per year. I don't know whom to believe!

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  45. Re:The same axiom applies. by drkstr1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am actually a better programmer after smoking a _small_ amount. My right-brained creative problem solving abilities are greatly increased, at the expense of some of my left-brained activities (such as doing math in my head). This is particularly important for me, a heavily left-brained thinker. Whenever I get stuck on a problem, I go have a "smoke break," and suddenly I have all kinds of ideas flowing through my head (some of which are even good). Results will vary depending on the person though.

    --
    Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
  46. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Madagascar has closed its ports.

  47. Re:The same axiom applies. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I think Pot may be like most things. A little probably wont hurt and might even be beneficial in some cases. Unfortunately it gets treated like alcohol by most people. If a little is good then more has to be better. That said, I don't really see why it's illegal.

  48. This was an episode of house. by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    I'm almost positive it's exactly the same. Except the plague episode was from a jar from a ship that had a cat, and the cat episode was a neighbour's pet that had previously died. Or something like that.

  49. Let it spread. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Survivors of this plague, when paired, produce offspring that are often missing the CCR5 receptor which the majority of HIV strains bind to for infection.

    This would (in theory) boost the future population's natural immunity, at least for that segment of the population, and until there's enough of that population to give marrow transfusions to the other population to give them artificial immunity to those strains. Of course, we then have to worry about the strains that work in a different manner, which would begin to become more prevalent.

    Just another bandage, but better than having to take a constant supply of drugs!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Let it spread. by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      And people intelligent enough to wash their hands before touching their mouth and nose after touching a shopping cart for example.

  50. simple equation by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Can nobody else figure this out?! Oregon + cat + rare centuries old plague = witch. That's just clear as day lol. Obviously it was a black cat as well. Time to start up the Salem witch trials again! What? I have the wrong Salem? It's Salem Massachusetts, not Salem Oregon? Shut up, lol.

    Okay, theory 2: apparently icanhascheezburger.com wasn't kidding. Cats really are trying to kill everyone and take over the world.

    Oh, and major correction to the bajillion above posts. This is NOT evolutionary Darwinism. This dumbass who basically tried to wrestle a rat away from a stray cat is doing something immensely stupid that will get everyone else killed. That's sort of the opposite.

  51. Re:2012 strikes again by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

    the ability of bacteria to exchange genes, even between different species of bacteria.

    This is a good time to remind everyone that the whole concept of different species is an intellectual model that we have found to be convenient in simplifying reality enough that we can understand it, sort of. We might all be in agreement about where the lines are between different species, but that does not impose any limitations on the reality Out There: it might be this way, or it might not.

    Most of the time the taxonomy of species, genus, phylum, etc is a good enough model to be useful. But when it comes to things that can affect inheritance of traits, it is important to remember that what we have is just a model, and is certainly wrong at some of its edges. With activities like prophylactic antibiotics and genetic engineering of food crops the species model just does not work. A more conservative, and saner, way of looking at antibiotics in cattle feed and GM corn is that we are monkeying with the genetics of an entire ecosystem, not just the target "species".

    At this level the concept of "species" is just wrong. In fact it is worse than wrong, it is entirely inappropriate.

    --
    Will
  52. Re:2012 strikes again by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

    I cannot offer any citations since the research I did on plague was back in the day before Internet and if I kept the notes I have lost track of where they might be. But as I recall there was strong evidence that bubonic plague and pneumonic plague were the same bacterium; that the only difference was in the mode of transmission. If bubonic plague got to the lungs, y. pestis was dispersed in aerosols as the victim coughed, and inhalation of the bacterium would assure a lung infection. This mode of transmission can be very deadly, with onset of symptoms, including cough, in hours and death within one or two days.

    I live in Oregon, where we have a documented case of plague every couple of years. At the time I read up about plague I was studying to be a Registered Nurse, and would occasionally see a doctor's order for a blood test to rule out plague.

    --
    Will
  53. Re:Lamarckism by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Read up on your evolutionary theory.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  54. Re:The same axiom applies. by Maritz · · Score: 1

    That said, I don't really see why it's illegal.

    Yeah it's interesting to think about. In the UK the government ignored and overruled scientific advice on cannabis and made it a Class "B" drug (with stiffer penalties), presumably because politics trumped science. I would imagine it's societal (cannabis is a drug, alcohol for some reason isn't "it's not a drug, it's a DRINK") and maybe even financial - in many parts of the world it'd be so easy to grow that it would be difficult to monetise in the way big companies like.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  55. Re:The Plague by isorox · · Score: 1

    Yep, it was a 50-year-old men. People in that demographic are infamous for avoiding medical treatment until it's too late.

    That is because by the time we are that old, we know that most doctors don't actually know as much as they think (meaning they tend to guess alot), and don't want to pay the high price for that.

    What a strange country the U.S. is

  56. Plagues is spread by fleas by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

    We have bubonic plague endemic in prairie dog colonies in Colorado. It is spread by fleas and every so often, a dog colony collapses as it flares up.

    We are warned to keep cats away form the colonies because they carry the fleas but I've never read where cats actually get the plague.

  57. Re:2012 strikes again by mysidia · · Score: 1

    False. That happens occasionally, but the vast majority of antibiotic resistance is because bacteria that cause human diseases are really, really good at developing resistance to antibiotics.

    It only has to happen once for every useful antibiotic effective against that kind of bacteria.

    For antibiotics to guarantee no new future plague caused by a kind of bacteria, they have to work every time.

    Or new kinds of antibiotics have to be developed at a rate no slower than the development of new resistance.

  58. So Not News by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

    There are usually several cases of Bubonic Plague in the US every year.

    It is treatable with antibiotics.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  59. Re:2012 strikes again by Abreu · · Score: 1

    Search YouTube for "Juan de los Muertos" for Cuban zombie goodness

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  60. Re:2012 strikes again by primenerd · · Score: 1

    How exactly does the presence of sublethal levels of antibiotics in the environment lead to selective pressure on E. coli to take up a shiga-toxin gene? Current research I have seen indicates the toxin provides an advantage in persistent carriage in livestock and has nothing to do with surviving antibiotics in animal feeds.
    I strongly agree with the sentiment that antibiotics in agriculture are severely overused, but I do not think this is a valid example.

    --
    AUGAUUUGCGCACAUAUCUCAGCGAAUGAAAGGGAUUAA
  61. Re:2012 strikes again by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    The other half of controlling Black Plague is nutrition. A big part of why it thrived was due to inadequate high-nutrition foods, resulting in diminished immune systems. (That's a part of your 'prevention' picture.)

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  62. Re:Fucking cat people by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 1

    Most people are jerks too, so I guess it depends on which kind of jerk you prefer to spend your time around.

  63. Re:The same axiom applies. by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

    I am glad I do not have to maintain your code base.

    On the contrary, I get complimented all the time on the "readability" of my code. It is the one art form I excell at.

    --
    Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7