Slashdot Mirror


The Ugly, Profitable Details About Xbox Live Advertising

An anonymous reader writes "In an editorial at Penny Arcade, Ben Kuchera writes about how Microsoft's subscription-based Xbox Live platform has become an advertising cash cow — to the detriment of users who already pay for the service. Quoting: 'People who don't play video games would be forgiven if they turned on an Xbox 360 and didn't realize it was a device used to primarily play games. The first screen you see on the Xbox 360 Dashboard is often a mixture of ads for all sorts of goods and services, and many times games are in the minority of ad slots. The latest redesign increased the ad space that can be sold to advertisers, and that in turn increased this problem. Let's be clear, it is a problem. Game discovery is terrible in the current design of Xbox Live, and the usability of a system that used to be about games is suffering in order for Microsoft to make money on ads. Sadly, this issue isn't going away: Ad sales simply bring in too much money to ignore, and revenue is growing. ... I contacted Microsoft and asked how much advertising revenue impacted the profitability of the Xbox 360. "We don't share this information publicly but we can tell you that, since 2010, the advertising business has grown 142%," I was told.'"

204 comments

  1. So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With Xbox Live you pay to receive ads. With PSN, you don't pay a dime and still get online gaming.

    While I'm acting smug as a PS3 owner, who doesn't have to put up with Microsoft's bullshit, I have to wonder just how much longer Sony's offering will last.

    1. Re:So, basically ... by masternerdguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are absolutely right my friend. I find it amazing that people will pay money to receive ads. This is why we need a non profit FOSS console that doesn't do this crap.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... Or you could use a PS3 which doesn't cost money for the service and doesn't blast you with ads....

    3. Re:So, basically ... by nthitz · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your service interruptions and user information leaks...

    4. Re:So, basically ... by hbean · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lots of people pay for cable, and there's a ton of ads on it. Just saying.

      --
      "Give someone a program, frustrate them for a day... Teach someone to program, frustrate them for a lifetime."
    5. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cable Channels with ads are still cheaper than premium channels without them.

    6. Re:So, basically ... by Rijnzael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt Sony is going to see what Microsoft is doing as anything other than a precedent and road map for future endeavors. The only reason PSN is free is because they wanted to overcome the shocking price of the initial PS3 models and wanted to take a chunk out of Xbox Live's market share. Xbox Live is profitable, PSN is not. If PSN ever reaches comfortable profitability, you can bet they'll be doing exactly what Microsoft is. They're just as much about screwing the customer as any other company (anti-piracy rootkits anyone?).

    7. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      One must wonder how many IEDs and AK47s the PSN network has bought for terrorists. Those stolen credit cards are probably used for nasty things.

    8. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, no. You get ads even on the free version of Xbox Live.

      And rest assured, now that the cat's out of the bag on how much money it's making everyone will be doing it next round. It's like, they could do nothing, or they could make free money. There's no downside for them.

    9. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure this is a perfect metaphor (though I don't know much about advertising in cable). In order to relate TV to Xbox live, you have to consider that the cable provider = Xbox live service, and cable channels = video games. With the cable advertisement system, advertisements are run on a per-channel basis, with time slots sold by the channel. The difference here is that the advertisements aren't coming in through the analogous video games, but through the provider itself, Xbox.

    10. Re:So, basically ... by Nadaka · · Score: 2

      There are ads that load in when you connect to PSN. However, most of those ads are for games/videos you can download from PSN.

    11. Re:So, basically ... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      There are ads sold by the cable provider as well.

      Either way this is why I will not pay for cable. I will not pay to see advertising.

    12. Re:So, basically ... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Not after the OtherOS/rootkit debacles. Support Microsoft likely isn't a good idea, either.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    13. Re:So, basically ... by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      I've had both Xbox Live and PSN. And it should tell you something about how shitty PSN is that I'm still willing to pay the $5 a month for Live.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    14. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The point is we don't pay anything to use the PSN. Those ads are justified.

    15. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I pay for a service, then I don't want to get ads as well. XBL got it wrong and since I get PSN for free, I can excuse the ads as I am not paying to be marketed to

    16. Re:So, basically ... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      With Xbox Live you pay to receive ads. With PSN, you don't pay a dime and still get online gaming.

      While I'm acting smug as a PS3 owner, who doesn't have to put up with Microsoft's bullshit, I have to wonder just how much longer Sony's offering will last.

      My PS3 is annoying in that there's an annoying ad ticker that I can'd disable (it's was controllable in OS 2, but as of 3, it's always on if it's connected to the internet - you don't even have to be signed into PSN for that).

      Now, granted, the Xbox ones have gotten a bit more pervasive lately. And I'm not talking about the game ads showing new offers and deals (PSN has lots of that - it seems to default to that screen when I turn on my PS3), but the other ads. I actually got a survey about them and told them to turn off those ad spots because they were getting distracting. The game ones at least I look at (usually about new DLC, new trailers and such - gaming related)

    17. Re:So, basically ... by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

      That exists, it's called a PC.

    18. Re:So, basically ... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

      I find it amazing that people will pay money to receive ads.

      Cable TV used to be ad-free.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    19. Re:So, basically ... by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      It has always surprised me that someone like ASUS has never sold a complete system that had a Console Mode. As the component manufacturer, they could guarantee extended availability of a specific model. If they included something like a linux distro that booted directly to a modified XBMC that was set up to boot games, and then return to the launcher with a standard keypress, they could be a console manufacturer over night. They wouldn't need to sell at a loss, as PC hardware that is on par with the current gen consoles could easily be had for a couple of hundred dollars. They wouldn't need to do special runs because the hardware would be standard PC hardware. They could sell the exact same parts to people who want to buy regular PCs. This would also make everyone one of their 'consoles' have a 'Boot to Other OS' feature that let them boot into Windows.

    20. Re:So, basically ... by Mad+Leper · · Score: 2

      Of course, we're all aware that not a single case of a supposed PSN stolen credit card being used illicitly has ever been reported.

      The XBOX Live FIFA hack is a much more lucrative source of funds, thousands of accounts stolen and no end in sight...

    21. Re:So, basically ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      While I'm acting smug as a PS3 owner

      That's like someone who eats cat shit looking down on someone who eats dog shit.

      You're smug about being a Sony customer. That is rich.

      If you are spending money supporting either platform, you're being used and abused.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    22. Re:So, basically ... by stms · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm surprised no one else has posted this yet. There's been a pretty big recent success with a FOSS console on kickstarter with the Ouya Console. Why was that modded funny it would be awesome if there was a successful FOSS console I certainly hope the Ouya is a success.

    23. Re:So, basically ... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      This is why we need a non profit FOSS console that doesn't do this crap.

      Maybe this is not as funny as you think.

      One of these would make an excellent starting point for a Linux or Android powered console. You could build it yourself.

      A Korean hardware manufacturer called Hardkernel is launching a high-end alternative. The company’s new ODROID-X board comes with a Samsung Exynos 4 processor, a quad-core CPU clocked at 1.4GHz. The board also has a quad-core Mali 400 GPU, 1GB of RAM, six USB host ports, an ethernet adapter, headphone and microphone jacks, and an SDHC card slot for storage.

      With four times as much RAM as the Raspberry Pi and a much more powerful processor, the Hardkernel board seems like a nice option for more computationally-intensive usage scenarios. The system is still highly compact, measuring at about 3.5 x 3.7 inches.

      http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/07/korean-company-offers-3-5-inch-quad-core-arm-linux-computer-for-129/

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    24. Re:So, basically ... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of indie consoles out there, but most have one (or more) of these problems:

      A) Impossible to find.

      B) Questionable build quality

      C) Lack of non-emulated games

      Currently there are quite a few Linux-based consoles out there:

      The GP2x and its successors the Wiz and CAANOO. The Dingoo. And most notably the Pandora (or Open Pandora as its often called)

      Out of all of them I only own a GP2x (original model) and it wasn't a bad console, it was a pain to get (I think I had to order it direct from Korea) and had some weird build quality issues (the batteries were nearly impossible to remove, not a bad problem at first but a set of AA high capacity batteries lasted about 4 hours of gameplay meaning you had to change batteries often), the original model also had a weird joystick that sort of worked but sort of didn't. There was a decent amount of software available, but, lets be honest, it was more my portable SNES :)

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    25. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry there will never ever be a successful FOSS console, do you really think EA, Activision, and UBISoft will ever push a game onto such a device, no never ever, stop smoking pipe dreams

    26. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >With PSN, you don't pay a dime and still get online gaming.
      Unless you count your credit card number and personal information escaping into the wild...

    27. Re:So, basically ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Or just play games on computers instead of consoles...

    28. Re:So, basically ... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Hell, if you got the SNES emulator working well on the 2X, you did better than a lot of us.

      The Dingoo's not much better. Supposedly it can emulate SNES, but it seems to choke to death. At least it has a real battery in it, though. The GP2X sucked them dry like Dracula on a bender...

      These days, I'm just struggling to keep my old 1001 "phat" PSP running. It does all the old emulation that I used to go to the expensive "linux" handhelds for, plus half-decent PSX.

      I like the idea of Ouya, but I really think it's going to end up being more of the same (and with a $4.5M kickstart, it's gonna be one hell of a shitstorm)

    29. Re:So, basically ... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mine was a lucky one and had a CPU that would overclock fairly high, then again, I mostly played RPGs on it, so speed didn't matter as much.

      I really want(ed) a Pandora, when it was envisioned back in 2007/8 the specs were unreal, a keyboard, 600 Mhz ARM CPU, Wi-Fi, 256 MB of RAM...

      Fast forward a few years and my phone which cost me under $200 on contract comes with always on 3.5G internet, Wi-Fi, a keyboard, a dual-core 1 Ghz ARM CPU, a camera... etc.

      Ever since I've had a smartphone, I really haven't bought many other gadgets. I've got a 3DS (birthday gift) and that gets used only about once a week, usually to play a retro game. Perhaps I'm turning into less of a geek but I just don't see me really -needing- another device save for another commercial game console when the 4DS (or if I switch over to Sony's camp which is unlikely). I'd like a cheap little device I could have fun with, or heck, I'd like a nice HDD based (I've had terrible luck with SD cards lately...) music player that's cheap and not an iPod (mostly to travel with), if it runs Linux that's a bonus.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    30. Re:So, basically ... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      With Xbox Live you pay to receive ads. With PSN, you don't pay a dime and still get online gaming.

      While I'm acting smug as a PS3 owner, who doesn't have to put up with Microsoft's bullshit, I have to wonder just how much longer Sony's offering will last.

      Knowing Sony not long...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    31. Re:So, basically ... by BoogeyOfTheMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wish people would stop spreading this FUD. Yes Sony-BMG did the whole root kit thing and they should be shunned for it, but Sony Computer Entertainment had nothing to do with that division.

      Its like not buying a Yamaha keyboard because you think Yamaha motorcycles suck. Or hating someone because their brother is a douche bag.

      If you're going to hate a company, hate them for the things they DID do.

    32. Re:So, basically ... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      As a member of the master race, PC gamer, I'd laugh at you both... except I find myself reloading the ads on the steam page every half an hour to see if there's a deal on a game I already own on the 360.

    33. Re:So, basically ... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      And I used to have a cable TV service, guess when it was dropped, pay for advertising, oh yeah, just how gullible did those idiots think I was.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    34. Re:So, basically ... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Pointing out someone else's smell doesn't make your own funk go away.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    35. Re:So, basically ... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Just saying.

      Can we please bury this hackneyed and utterly useless expression?

    36. Re:So, basically ... by Superdarion · · Score: 2

      Well, people are already working on it. It's called OUYA and sounds good to me.

    37. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Navigate to Settings > System Settings > Display [What's New] and then press X and you can turn it off.

    38. Re:So, basically ... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      These days, I'm just struggling to keep my old 1001 "phat" PSP running. It does all the old emulation that I used to go to the expensive "linux" handhelds for, plus half-decent PSX.

      There are signed emulators that work on ANY PSP, even one with current firmware, so you can have your emulators AND still have access to all the stuff on PSN.

    39. Re:So, basically ... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I wish people would stop spreading this FUD. Yes Sony-BMG did the whole root kit thing

      SONY BMG didn't make the rootkit themselves, they contracted it out to a third party, told them "protect our CD's". The third party supplied the software, SONY threw it on ASAFP cause they were paranoid....discovered rootkit.

      SONY then sued the third party company saying "We did NOT contract for a rootkit that would do nast things to customers computers"

    40. Re:So, basically ... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, since it might mean I can stop frankensteining this thing the next time it craps out on me. Does that include PSXPSP (PSX games ripped and converted to eboot), since that's the biggest "seller" for me (for everything else I have some other device I can use).

      If I'm going to be completely honest, the Romans had no number for the fucks I give about anything on PSN. Most if it's stuff I already paid for on the PSX or PS2, and the rest... well, there are precious few companies who have earned enough trust from me to trust them with digital distribution, and if Valve didn't make the cut, Sony sure as hell isn't, either.

    41. Re:So, basically ... by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Many people do. What about cable or satellite subscribers? And if you aren't always on the hunt for a price promotion, TV is far more expensive than XBL. I'm glad I'm not the only one frustrated by this. Many times it isn't video games being advertised and it frustrates me to sift through so much shit to play a game.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    42. Re:So, basically ... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Does that include PSXPSP (PSX games ripped and converted to eboot), since that's the biggest "seller" for me

      Don't know, that's one of the things I don't do. They "should" work if they're signed. The homebrew I use most often is bookr, handy for reading faqs and stuff.

    43. Re:So, basically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would stop spreading this FUD. Yes Sony-BMG did the whole root kit thing and they should be shunned for it, but Sony Computer Entertainment had nothing to do with that division.

      Its like not buying a Yamaha keyboard because you think Yamaha motorcycles suck. Or hating someone because their brother is a douche bag.

      If you're going to hate a company, hate them for the things they DID do.

      Fair enough. We should hare Sony Computer Entertainment for "We accidentally gave away all your credit card details. Please accept this new update with a EULA stating you are not allowed to sue us. Decline and you wont be allowed on PSN."

    44. Re:So, basically ... by robsku · · Score: 1

      Indeed, OtherOS stuff proved again what we have known since, at least, the rootkit shame that Sony is not worthy of trust - it's a company that, like MS, is ready to use shady and criminal tactics with little/no respect for it's customers to do whatever they want (/think that would be good idea, even if really not).

      Personally have been boycotting both, Sony and MS, for some time now - I do some cross-platform development, but to test my applications on Windows I actually just test with Linux+Wine (if it works on that then it should be fine with real Windows anyway).

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    45. Re:So, basically ... by robsku · · Score: 1

      I think it's a fair possibility - there is a load of FOSS things that were never to happen, such claims don't really work on me... Of course there might never be one, thus the word "possibility".

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    46. Re:So, basically ... by robsku · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like I'm going to believe that they just put the software on their discs without knowing how it would function - and even if they did, well, I would certainly not let them off the hook for being utterly irresponsible. Anyway, as I see it, the excuses are just that - PR BS / excuses.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    47. Re:So, basically ... by robsku · · Score: 1

      Mod this up people, I would if I could, an excellent example of typical Sonyish behavior.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    48. Re:So, basically ... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      What more do you want from Sony-BMG? It's been 6 years after all.

      1. they stopped using the rootkit
      2. sued the company that provided it
      3. stopped using ATRAC and their MP3 players support MP3 natively unlike their early models which had Sonicstage convert the MP3's to ATRAC during the transfer

    49. Re:So, basically ... by robsku · · Score: 1

      Well, I basically don't want anything from Sony-BMG...

      Their only dirt is not rootkit, nor that and OtherOS scam (an advertised feature) - they have lot's of crap in past and they have lost my trust. Also, statements like "copying a song from your (legally bought) CD to your MP3 player is theft", etc. have made me despise Sony. To hell with them, as far as I'm considered.

      Their MP3 players support MP3 natively? Big whoop - they have a product that (nowdays) does what it should.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  2. And people talk bad about Sony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know the XBox did this; now I wonder if it also does all that when you got a paid subscription ?

    My PS3 simply shows a nice static menu with a bar 'wave' moving up and down a little. No menu's at all. And I'm not even paying for Net access.

    1. Re:And people talk bad about Sony... by mikestew · · Score: 1

      I didn't know the XBox did this; now I wonder if it also does all that when you got a paid subscription ?

      It's even in the summary: yes, paying subscribers see ads.

      I don't really care about the ads per se, but that in an effort to cram more ads on the screen the stuff I actually use is buried. Most of the time it doesn't matter, I guess, since I throw a game DVD in the drive and wait for it to load.

    2. Re:And people talk bad about Sony... by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      My PS3 simply shows a nice static menu with a bar 'wave' moving up and down a little. No menu's at all. And I'm not even paying for Net access.

      I recall that ad ticker first appearing in the 3.00 firmware... it still bothers me. That was also the point at which the "PLAYSTATION 3" startup became PS3, which looks a bit out of place if you don't have a slim.

      This story reminds me, however, that what Sony has done on this matter is a whole lot less intrusive than MS's choices.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  3. Coming Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To a Windows 8 system near you. Have you seen the Video App?

  4. Filter it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was really annoyed with this when they first updated the console so the home screen was overrun with ads. I simply blocked their ad sub domain on my router. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Filter it. by masternerdguy · · Score: 0

      I guarantee you violated some kind of TOS doing that, which means they can decide to kick you off their network.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:Filter it. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      You are a genius, I will do that this very day.

    3. Re:Filter it. by Rijnzael · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they have contract terms that basically allow them to discontinue your service for any or no reason whatsoever, so it's not like that changes much. I suppose the only difference would be, in the case of breaches of contract, you wouldn't get a refund.

    4. Re:Filter it. by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Have you got the address so the more lazy among us can block it too?

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    5. Re:Filter it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at work right now, so I don't have immediate access to it. Check back here in 2hrs if no one else has posted it.

    6. Re:Filter it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      rad.msn.com
      msnvidweb.vo.msecnd.net

    7. Re:Filter it. by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What makes it even more annoying is that there were *2* primary reasons for the Xbox Dash redesign:

      1) make it 100% Kinect-accessible
      2) promote content more (much of it paid) and increase advertising space

      So, they changed the fairly decent previous Xbox Dashboard to something designed around products I don't want to see and a UI navigation mechanism I don't want to use. For the vast majority of users out there who just want to use a controller to play a game or watch a movie, it's a major step backwards in usability.

    8. Re:Filter it. by demonbug · · Score: 2

      What makes it even more annoying is that there were *2* primary reasons for the Xbox Dash redesign:

      1) make it 100% Kinect-accessible
      2) promote content more (much of it paid) and increase advertising space

      So, they changed the fairly decent previous Xbox Dashboard to something designed around products I don't want to see and a UI navigation mechanism I don't want to use. For the vast majority of users out there who just want to use a controller to play a game or watch a movie, it's a major step backwards in usability.

      Hmm, reminds me of a certain other MS product... what's it called... oh yeah, Windows 8.

      Hey, let's redesign our UI specifically for an interface that 95% of our customers don't use! Brilliant!

    9. Re:Filter it. by Torodung · · Score: 1

      So, they changed the fairly decent previous Windows 7 desktop to something designed around products I don't want to see and a UI navigation mechanism I don't want to use. For the vast majority of users out there who just want to use a desktop computer to play a game or watch a movie, it's a major step backwards in usability.

      Hmm. With substitutions in place, I'm detecting a disturbance in the force...

    10. Re:Filter it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X-Box 720 will open an IPSEC link to the mothership. Problem solved.

    11. Re:Filter it. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you violated some kind of TOS doing that, which means they can decide to kick you off their network.

      Perhaps, but wouldn't they have to hack your router to find out, thus violating several federal statutes?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    12. Re:Filter it. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Hmm, reminds me of a certain other MS product... what's it called... oh yeah, Windows 8.

      Hey, let's redesign our UI specifically for an interface that 95% of our customers don't use! Brilliant!

      Yeah, I forgot to add to my last comment - Hello Metro, meet he Xbox...

    13. Re:Filter it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Windows 8
      I just call it Bob 2.0

    14. Re:Filter it. by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      There was a time when 95% of customers only used the keyboard. There was a time when 95% of customers didn't have an internet connection. There was a time when 95% of customers had no GPU acceleration. There was a time when 95% of smart phones had no capacitive touch due to price and availability and therefore couldn't respond properly to finger input.

      Sometimes you need to bite the bullet and lead.

  5. What exactly is suffering? by jeffy210 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what is exactly is suffering for gaming? Has the hardware been gimped? Can you not just pop a game in and play it? The XBox is being slotted as a media platform, not just a gaming platform and it seems to be doing that rather well, just look at the sales. Just because it's not the uber-hardcore gaming machine you're expecting does not make it bad. If you really want that go build a PC. But as long as it plays games and you still have access to game content, all while providing additional entertainment and media options, I fail to see the issue.

    To be honest, I use mine mainly for Netflix and other media related options. Occasionally I do play a game, so it fits perfectly for me. It's no longer just a "gaming console".

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
    1. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's just seems harder to get access to games and look and explore the XBLA for possible purchases if you're bombarded with ads for TV shows, EA sports game and mountain dew ads.

    2. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I use mine mainly for Netflix and other media related options. Occasionally I do play a game, so it fits perfectly for me. It's no longer just a "gaming console".

      Heh, but I'd say the same stuff about my Wii but not have ads.

    3. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, besides the fact that it can interfere with your ability to find actual content (as others have pointed out), it's also the "frog in boiling water" problem. While it may not interfere with your ability to do what you want now, I have no doubt MS is looking at the possibility of doing things like playing unskippable ads before you can play DVDs or games, or adding ads into games (or even movies) on the fly. Anything they can do to make even more money. And so long as people have a good deal already invested in the platform (in the form of locked-in games and whatnot), people won't switch away. Whatever MS can get away with, they will do, eventually.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:What exactly is suffering? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone with half a brain knew the 360 was another attempt at a set-top box to dominate the living room but you can't blame people for being upset when MS specfically aimed the system at "core" gamers and have now turned it into something to appeal to their mothers because it turns out those gamers aren't profitable enough in their eyes.
      br / Also it's pretty fucking poor as a media machine. A desktop serves that job better. For starters the xbox is never going to have to space to hold all my ripped music and DVDs. I own easily at least 500 DVDs and some blu-rays. I need some serious space for that. Not some toy whose sole purpose is to drain my wallet.

    5. Re:What exactly is suffering? by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Or HD

    6. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      The focus on content/ad placement and Kinect gesture/voice support throughout the entire Dash (and all media apps) was a major step backwards in usability for navigation and discovery for the vast majority of users. Welcome to Metro...

    7. Re:What exactly is suffering? by scot4875 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Big fuckin' deal. I've had an HD TV for nearly 10 years; HD is a nice bonus, but it doesn't make a bad movie good, and the lack of it doesn't make a good game bad.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    8. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own easily at least 500 DVDs and some blu-rays. I need some serious space for that.

      Damn you just gave me a great idea! I'll build a Content Distribution Network (let's call it a CDN for short) that will be used to hosts THOUSANDS of DVDs and LOTS of blu-rays. I'll partner with ISPs so that my CDN can be connected to the Internet (the "net" if you will).

      Once I have that setup, you'll be able to pay me a pittance to access your 500 DVD and some blu-ray "flicks".

      You know, that gave me another great idea for the name of my new venture: Netflix! You can watch "flicks" while connected to the "net"! Be right back... *goes to register domain name*

      SHIT! Someone stole my idea!!! What were you complaining about again? Hard disk space? Meh.

    9. Re:What exactly is suffering? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes we will get off your lawn grandpa.

    10. Re:What exactly is suffering? by locopuyo · · Score: 0

      It doesn't make a good game bad because the games where it matters are not on Wii.
      To modern gamers clarity does matter. You probably won't understand because you don't play modern games.

    11. Re:What exactly is suffering? by chispito · · Score: 1

      Movies have trailers, and product placement. TVs have ads. Magazines have ads. A lot of the xBox applications, like Hulu Plus, have ads. What is the big deal, exactly?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    12. Re:What exactly is suffering? by phriedom · · Score: 1

      If you had all your media on a Windows PC, which you probably don't but lets pretend you do because lots of people who don't read slashdot do, then an Xbox would be a pretty good way to get that media into the livingroom for $200. The big thing it is missing is that it isn't a DVR, but it is actually a pretty good solution for the rest of the problem.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    13. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes to this - I rip all of my media to my laptop and then share it to the Xbox via Windows Media Center (which could use some improvement in menu load time and performance but overall is great) and also stream that media to my iPad using AirPlayIt

      Now that they have Amazon, Xbox just needs Pandora and it would be almost exactly everything I could want.

    14. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what is suffering? My mind stop spamming me when you clearly don't need the extra revenue.

    15. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about future forced interactive ads, before you can play a stupid game. When does it get to the point that I no longer have control of whats going on around my life and forced to put more money in a corporations pocket that I want nothing to do with?

    16. Re:What exactly is suffering? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      My DVDs don't require a subscription and many were bought before Netflix existed so why would I pay to access a digital version when I can make a free digital version and I can put into any format and doesn't require Silverlight and isn't susceptible to network failures.? I dunno, the idea of paying a subscription fee for something I already have seem pretty retarded.

    17. Re:What exactly is suffering? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Well yeah but if the desktop PC is effectively a server then there is an assumption it's not by the TV or I have multiple TVs. So for some people it may make sense (ie multiple TVs for multiple kids or something).

      But the desktop will of course act as a server so I can access material on my laptop elsewhere but I want play PC games more than xbox games so it makes more sense just to hook up the PC to the TV. Rather than hooking up a box that requires an XBL subscription on top of a netflix subscription and any other subscriptions I need and a, imo, broken game purchasing system that requires me to buy points rather than just using money which ensures I pretty much always get left with a balance. That and it has no web browser. Admittedly it is only just now getting IE at some point this year but ignoring the fact it's IE, the system has been around for 7 years and is only just getting a web browser. For the time being though that means it requires subscription to XBL just to use freebies like twitter and facebook and worse yet, that's the best you're going to get out of the net until IE does finally come.

    18. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      I play games because they are fun not because they "matter" or don't. There are a good chunk of fun games on the Wii, Super Mario Galaxy (2), Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Xenoblade, Fire Emblem, New Super Mario Bros, Skyward Sword, Pandora's Tower, Mario Kart, Etc. None of those games really suffer by not having HD, a sucky game like Castlevania Judgment won't be improved by having HD, New Super Mario Bros isn't worse off by not having HD.

      There are great games on the Xbox and PS3, but don't discount the Wii.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    19. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      So what is exactly is suffering for gaming? Has the hardware been gimped? ...

      yes, the Xbox 360 has gimped hardware, since it was first released, and they never fixed it.

      But hey, it's good enough for 5 more years according to MS.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    20. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the big deal, exactly?

      It lowers the net value of the product to the consumer. In the case of mature markets the ad load is increased until the net value of the product is only marginally above zero.

    21. Re:What exactly is suffering? by Tukz · · Score: 1

      But it most certainly makes a good game, or movie, better.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    22. Re:What exactly is suffering? by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are good games on the Wii but there are tons of games not possible on the Wii, especially for first person shooters. You can barely see anything in 4 player split screen because you have 320x240 resolution for each player's screen area. You are extremely limited in making accurate shots because the resolution isn't there to give you accuracy. You can't display advanced things on the GUI because the text is too hard to read unless it is gigantic at that resolution. Yes there were games on previous consoles that worked, but modern games take advantage of the resolution with a lot of features that aren't possible at low definition.

  6. For Xbox 360 users ... by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a method you can use to block some of those ads:

    http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/n5831/how_to_block_xbox_dashboard_ads/

    It doesn't block all of them, but it does block most of the animated, generic ads that aren't related to gaming.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:For Xbox 360 users ... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I've got a better idea. Switch to PC gaming, and say screw you to consoles. You can indeed hook a PC up via HDMI without a problem.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:For Xbox 360 users ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hey, awesome. I plugged the hosts rad.msn.com and msnvidweb.vo.msecnd.net into my D-Link router's "Website Filtering Rules" section and no more ads at all. The lower right panel on the dashboard home is now encouraging me to "Check My Network".

      What else is awesome, but is less awesome and totally unrelated, is that "Website Filtering Rules" was in all-caps on the router config page, but it pasted in camel case here. CSS FTW

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:For Xbox 360 users ... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting someone should use a PC for gaming instead of the xbox on slashdot? You're kind of preaching to the choir there.

    4. Re:For Xbox 360 users ... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Hardly, the previous thread about pc vs consoles that was on here /. was chock full of people still on consoles because they couldn't be bothered, and they wanted "console exclusive" titles.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  7. Quick workaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the past 4 years or so, I've set up my 360 as a "Media Center Server" or client or something, can't remember. Upon boot, I get a screen that says "Can not detect media center". Then I press the center button, which brings up a small, tidy menu with which I can do whatever I need, including launch a game.

  8. to the detriment of the user experience by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    The XBox Live interface has gotten worse with each revision. Usability is terrible, with the features that the user is really interested in buried under a ton of ads. The PS3 interface is enormously superior, and at least all of the ads are segregated out of the way.

    But both of their online stores are really lousy even in terms of selling things--far inferior to Apple's iTunes (which is no great shakes itself).

    1. Re:to the detriment of the user experience by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you really feel that the PSN interface is better than XBox? Whereas XBox is more complex and not as simple to navigate, it has always felt like a richer experience overall. That being said, I don't subscribe to Live....because I"m not willing to pay for a service that is free on every other platform. Fanboi console monkeys seem to be willing to settle for dumbed down gameplay, poor control schemes, and price gouging....but that's the world they choose. (I do own a PS3, Xbox360, and a few PCs.)

      Valve's Steam has ever other online gaming/marketplace/matchmaking service I've seen beaten...hands down. Nothing else really compares for overall value and usability.

    2. Re:to the detriment of the user experience by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Yes. I have both, but I'll always go to the PS3 first if I have a choice. I recently had to go to the Xbox to access HBO Go, and as usual found myself swearing at the horrible interface. Most of the menu items on the upper level XBox menu are things that Microsoft is trying to sell you. Things like preferences and access to services like Netflix or your own media on other devices are buried. And instead of being organized in a nice, clean hierarchical menu like on the PS3, things are in panels in blocks (all with flashy pictures) with little logic to the arrangement, bringing back ugly memories of Microsoft's early versions of Windows that stuck documents in panes (back before they gave up on their own design and decided to imitate the Mac).

      Actually, I think the "3D" menu on the PS3 has the most usable interface that I've seen on any TV box (except maybe a TiVo)--even better than Apple TV (which is not bad). And the XBox 360 is about the worst.

    3. Re:to the detriment of the user experience by Fallingcow · · Score: 2

      I live in terror that one day Sony will realize how much money they could make if they ran their store more like Steam--how many games they could sell if they cut the normal prices a bit and ran occasional steep sales, how easy it would be to kill Redbox by allowing me to rent movies I can't find on Netflix at a competitive price (instead of the current you'd-have-to-be-insane-or-stupid-to-pay-it rate that amounts to half the cost of the damn DVD just to "rent" the digital file), no more points bullshit (do they still do that? I haven't looked in so long...), etc.

      If they'd done that a couple years ago they'd likely have seen a few hundred dollars from me instead of the $20 or so I've spent with things the way they are. I'd buy more digital copies of games "new" during sales rather than doing what I usually do now and buying the discs used, and I might actually use their movie service.

      Thank god they haven't figured that out. They could have gotten a lot of money from me, the bastards.

  9. 'Customers' are the product for more than just ads by Rijnzael · · Score: 1

    Xbox Live is in the unique situation of being able to sell ads to the end-user, sell the ability to access end-users (via Marketplace) to publishers/developers, and take a cut of those purchases between publisher and end-user.

    The article discusses this as a problem, but as far as Microsoft is concerned, it's everything as it should be. Customers aren't pissed enough to leave because they still see value in the service they're paying for and the ads are pretty unobtrusive. Until end-users or publishers get annoyed enough at the status quo to make a significant enough dent in their profits, Microsoft is not going to care. As it stands, we'll pretty much have to wait for one of the big name publishers to get annoyed enough that their games aren't getting the exposure they want, because the current minority voice of end-users annoyed at ads just isn't loud enough, and I don't think it ever will be. Publishers and their triple-A titles on the other hand have a ton of sway.

    Of course, it will be interesting to see if the increasing dependence on Microsoft continues. If so, it might get to the point where the publishers don't have much sway as far as negotiations are concerned. Given that the gaming industry (excepting a few smart companies and indie devs) are basically abandoning the PC market in favor of locked-in console gamers, we're near the point where the console manufacturers and their signing keys are going to be the barrier between publishers and their continued success (or eventual failure).

  10. Dashboard Devolution by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't own an original XBox, so I don't have a frame of reference but I've noticed that since I bought my 360 in 2008 most updates to the Dashboard have been working hard at making it more difficult to find my games or my home media.

    In fact, with the latest batches of updates (Metro-like?) I've found it very difficult to get to games I want to play in my library, to the point now that I forego the GUI and go straight to the "quick play" option (which is basically just an alphabetically sorted list). And browsing my home network has been completely removed in lieu of streaming (yuck, no thanks).

    I think Microsoft could learn a thing or two from Valve, Steam is pretty easy to use but is also a ad delivery system, I can find everything rather easily in Steam and I find it a lot less annoying than the 360 Dashboard, also Steam has sales for games that don't suck, and that makes me want to spend money but hey, that's just my opinion...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Dashboard Devolution by Dyinobal · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ya I'm a pc gamer and I've only sever seen xbox live used and never used it myself but I am baffled at why people pay to get ads on their xbox and to play games online, when you're already paying for the internet connection, why should it matter if your console is connecting or not. It would be like paying for my tablet to connect to my wifi and get online and play scrable or what ever. Why do xbox users put up with this?

    2. Re:Dashboard Devolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's really only one reason and that's online multiplayer for some games, other than that it's a total waste.

    3. Re:Dashboard Devolution by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      All the other platforms have free online multiplayer. Why pick the one that charges a monthly fee?

    4. Re:Dashboard Devolution by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 1

      There is more to the choice than "do I get charged or not".

      --
      I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    5. Re:Dashboard Devolution by tepples · · Score: 1

      All the other platforms have free online multiplayer. Why pick the one that charges a monthly fee?

      Because it's the only one that has indie games and living-room games on the same device.

    6. Re:Dashboard Devolution by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Xbox Live started in the first Xbox when it's competition was almost non-existant for consoles (PS2 had some network capability but vastly less than Xbox). XBL is generally seen as a superior online experience to PSN from what I've seen. The 360 launched before the PS3 by about a year, so if you wanted next-gen graphics you had to get a 360, also the 360 had more next-gen games by the time the PS3 launched than were available on the PS3. Computers are too difficult and expensive for many people. If the PS3 had launched at the same time as the 360 it would probably be neck-and-neck. But they didn't (of course if the 360 hadn't had the RRoD issue then PS3 probably wouldn't even be a contender). Disclosure: My primary gaming platform is the PC, secondary is 360. I play almost no multiplayer.

    7. Re:Dashboard Devolution by fermion · · Score: 1
      The customer of microsoft is never the end user. The customer of MS WIndows is the OEM. The customer of the xBox is the the developer. Obviously this business model is not working, so they must p the ads.

      Yes, this is a problem if it is hurting developers. However, if the developers are not using screen real estate effectively, then MS has to do something else.

      To me it seems the issue is the charging for xBox Live.Charging to do what one can do for free on a computer is really stupid. I can see some value in multiplayer games, but if they are going to be using advertising, why charger?

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Dashboard Devolution by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      I find it amusing when people say cahrging for Gold is stupid. Xbox is the clear front-runner in America and competitive in Europe, the only place where Playstation has a clear lead is Japan and I doubt anyone seriosuly thinks that Xbox was going to win Japan this generation.

      Xbox has kept pace with PS3 while charging for Gold, ditching Gold would probably only bring a small number of people over while reducing income to a significant degree, how is that stupid?

      You can certainly argue that it's stupid to PAY for that, but it's retarded to say that it's stupid for them to charge it.

    9. Re:Dashboard Devolution by Nyder · · Score: 1

      ... Why do xbox users put up with this?

      The same reason that console users think that using a gamepad to play a fps shooter is the way to go.

      In other words, most 360 (console) gamers are idiots.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    10. Re:Dashboard Devolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not accurate. On the other online services you get dedicated servers at least some of the time.

    11. Re:Dashboard Devolution by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Nope, most Xboxer owners don't give a damn about indie games. Heck most PC gamers don't either.

      The real draw of Xbox Live I was told is:

      Shooter of the week multiplayer.
      And
      Cross game chat so you can pester your friends to stop playing last weeks shooter so you can play this weeks shooter of the week.

    12. Re:Dashboard Devolution by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      [quote]In other words, most 360 (console) gamers are idiots.[/quote]

      I think PC gamers are idiots for tolerating non-analog WASD movement and badly designed UI and controls that aren't all that hand friendly.

      Course, I'm one of those console idiots who prefers analog movement, but likes the option of mouse aiming in my shooters.

  11. The Xbox is no longer A Gaming Console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The evolution of the "xbox" brand has been a really interesting series of decisions that has totally changed the way that game consoles are viewed.

    Originally, the xbox was a true gaming console. When xbox live first came out it ushered in a new group of people into online gaming with titles like Halo 2 and Forza for those who wanted to play against people online, but not on a PC.

    Then the xbox 360 came out. The "Blade" UI was fairly interesting and clean. You had 4 main categories, your social stuff, your games stuff, your media stuff, and of course your general settings. There was barely, if any, space for advertisers to peddle their products.

    The paradigm shift I feel from game console to "walled off PC with a monthly fee" hit when the NXE update came out.

    "Improved Xbox LIVE Marketplace UI and browse experience — the Games Marketplace has been re-organized to provide streamlined access to the games and content you want, reducing the number of steps it takes to get to a download," was what they said would happen.

    Then you installed the update and everything became more about consuming new things as opposed to things you already owned. It was strangely organised, and cluttered with advertisements for soft drink and snack companies.

    Then Netflix hit it big (before the Quickster shenanigans) and the Xbox 360 all of a sudden became everybody and their mom's media streaming center (which you had to pay 15 dollars a month for xbox live just to have access too).

    With Game Sales in a large decline (and have been for months), more people are consuming other types of media. They're increasingly consuming this media through their games consoles. In a way, Microsoft has effectively changed their "Hardcore Games Brand" into a "Media Center for your TV Brand."

    Having sold my Xbox 360 in 2010 for this same reason (why would I pay 15 dollars a month, when I can just build a media center PC on the cheap?), it's an interesting story of how to take a market for a niche product and open it up for everybody.

    Oh and Kinect will never be a success as anything other than a guide on how to move a ton of units in a short amount of time on tech that really isn't ready for primetime.

    1. Re:The Xbox is no longer A Gaming Console by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      $15 a month? You must not be in America then. Here it's $10 a month and pre-2010 it was $8

  12. Xbox live membership by ThatGuy4029 · · Score: 1

    It's is interesting to think they would raise their prices for Xbox live membership cards at the same time they decided to redo the Xbox dashboard. The new dashboard, although staying true to their new style seen in the windows 8 beta and their mobile phone software it is proving vastly more useful in their own advertising Campaign. Honestly as an avid Xbox 360 gamer and user of windows I enjoy the product but am disappointed that a service I pay 60 dollars a year to maintain is still trying to squeeze money out of my pockets. Even PSN limits their advertising to minimum and that is a free service, I would like to see the next update fix some of my own personal concerns and allow gamers to focus on the sole purpose for the console, gaming.

    1. Re:Xbox live membership by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Honestly as an avid Xbox 360 gamer and user of windows [and slashdot reader] I enjoy the product but am disappointed that a service I pay 60 dollars a year to maintain is still trying to squeeze money out of my pockets

      Ok... I get joe consumer buying an xbox, but why you? Why not use an htpc/gaming pc? You can get most of the xobx games for windows, you can even use an xbox controller if you want, no subscriptions for basic multiplayer access, the games on windows tend to come out a few $ cheaper, and drop in price much faster than the console version.

      Sure the PC is a little more complex to setup, but you are here so i assume that's not an issue. Its a little more money upfront, but again you are here, so i assume you could spec and build decent gaming pc on the cheap if budget was a concern. And you'll make up the price difference on no subscriptions and savings on games in the long run.

      You also pick up the full flexibility of having a PC. Hard drive as big as you like, bluray drive if you want one, MAME etc if you are into retro games. Humble Bundles, GoG, Steam deals...

      So I'm curious what the appeal of the xbox is for you?

  13. Overstated by kamapuaa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm annoyed by the idea of ads, but in reality I don't think the ads get in the way at all.

    If you start your system with a game in it, press the "a" button and the game goes. To browse the game library, press down and hit "a."

    It's not like you have to sit through a commercial, it doesn't even take up screen space that would be better used elsewhere. It's basically a non-factor.

    XBLA games that get popular get popular through positive reviews, word-of-mouth, and advertising. Not because people are randomly browsing through streamlined XBox menus and decide to take a chance.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Overstated by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That does not matter. I will not pay to receive ads. If there are ads on the system the games had better be free.

      Same reason why I will never have cable, and would cancel netflix in an instant if they ever showed a single advertisement on streaming.

      The screen space would be better used by being blank.

    2. Re:Overstated by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      It's not like you have to sit through a commercial

      Ssshhh... don't give them any ideas! :P

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  14. This is my last xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an xbox a few years back. I played a few games (loved fallout) but found it was quite functional as my media player - streaming from my tversity server on the workstation. This was its primary use in the house.

    The last update has made the usability much worse. Instead of a couple clicks on the remote to get to the movie I want to watch, I have to navigate through screens of ads.

    Two weekends ago I replaced it with a computer. The only reason I held out so long was I preferred using a remote instead of a wireless keyboard/mouse.

    The xbox lives now on the shelf of lost toys - right on top of the VHS and DVD players.

    1. Re:This is my last xbox by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      They do have Bluetooth remotes that can link to a computer with the right software by the way.

  15. Well so what? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has made it pretty damn clear that their hopes and dreams for XBox is a media center more than just a game console. The games are still there though, and if it bothers you that much, just go to one of the dozen or so other gaming platforms available to you. Is there anything on Live these days that is really that unique of an experience?

    1. Re:Well so what? by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has made it pretty damn clear that their hopes and dreams for XBox is a streaming media center more than just a game console.

      FTFY. When it comes to watching your own video files trying anything but vanilla MP4s* or WMV-HD is an exercise in futility and may seriously harm one's sanity. There's also no subtitle support (hard-coded ones excepted) which, to me, is unforgivable. I'm sure if I tried something like netflix I'd be impressed - iPlayer certainly hasn't wowed me - but I'd rather be able to watch the things I already own without needing to re-encode them first.

      *You're limited to H.264 + 2 channel AAC. Unless you've got a NAS box or something to format HFS+ volumes (honestly, NTFS on USB disks isn't supported, but HFS+ inexplicably is) you're also stuck with a 4GB limit on files.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:Well so what? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has made it pretty damn clear that their hopes and dreams for XBox is a media center more than just a game console. The games are still there though, and if it bothers you that much, just go to one of the dozen or so other gaming platforms available to you. Is there anything on Live these days that is really that unique of an experience?

      hmm, my media center doesn't cost me a monthly fee, nor does it show me advertisement, so I wonder, who's media center are they trying to compete with.

      For the record, I haven't updated my xbox 360 ever since i got it 3 or so years ago.

      --
      Be seeing you...
  16. Cable TV anyone? by NalosLayor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to point out the rotting dead fish in the middle of the room, but this is exactly what happened with cable TV, and yet there is no real outrage on that front any more. I'm not saying it's the right thing...or even "acceptable" but customers seem to never balk at ads, and content streamers never turn down a revenue stream. It feels almost inevitable.

    1. Re:Cable TV anyone? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      So do what I did, cancel cable.
      Tell them why.

      Netflix has no such advertising and is cheaper. Hulu has the advertising but is free. I will pay for Hulu+ the moment it goes advertising free.

    2. Re:Cable TV anyone? by Pontiac · · Score: 1

      There is no outrage on cable/dish because 90% of the users have DVR's with add skipping remotes.

      Before I cut the cord I wouldn't even watch a show unless I had 20-30 min of skipping power.
      If I caught up to live programing I'd pause and do something else for 10-20 minutes.

      I wonder how long until my Blue Ray starts downloading streaming adds I can't skip before playing a new movie.

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    3. Re:Cable TV anyone? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      I think the lack of outrage has been mitigated in recent years by the introduction of timeshifting devices (e.g. VCR and Tivo) that also allow you to skip ads, as well as alternative sources for content that either display less ads (e.g. Hulu) or no ads at all (e.g. Netflix, torrents, other P2P, etc.). Instead of outrage, people are either working around the problem or are voting with their wallets and leaving cable in droves.

    4. Re:Cable TV anyone? by Pontiac · · Score: 1

      Cable hasn't been ad free for 30 years so don't act like it's some new service just turned up with false promises. They made it maybe 5-7 years before they started piling on advertisement supported content to bloat up the number of channels.

      As for Blu-ray Disc Understand my point of view.. I didn't give a shit about what kind of disc it could play of how they spell it. I bought the damn thing because it was on sale and could stream Netflix & Hulu. I just wanted to retire an the old PC I used for streaming media that was dumping tons of heat into an overloaded cabinet.

      As for my Mon's computer.. Hell yeah she knows.. She buys a new one almost every year. I set it up for her and take the old one home. I'm not to proud to pass up a free nearly new PC only used by a little old lady to program her sewing machine and load Barry Manalow tunes on her iPod.

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    5. Re:Cable TV anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the ever increasing licensing fees Netflix is required to pay, don't be surprised when ads start showing up every time a movie is played.

    6. Re:Cable TV anyone? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      There is no outrage on cable/dish because 90% of the users have DVR's with add skipping remotes.

      As you note yourself in a later post, ads on cable have been around for a very long time, well before DVR and ad-skipping. There was some grumbling, but it didn't last very long and didn't keep cable from being popular.

    7. Re:Cable TV anyone? by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Even Netflix has unskippable ads if you include what comes on the disc you're renting (although they aren't getting the revenue). In this day and age you have to kind of accept that there's going to be some ads here and there and just hope that they're making your media a bit cheaper.

      For hulu+ though ya; I definitely wouldn't pay extra for that kind of service if it didn't get rid of the ads.

    8. Re:Cable TV anyone? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You need a better DVD player. Mine will skip when I tell it to.

  17. Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to say that the 360 has been one disappointment after another when it comes to the console itself. The games are fine, as is the media selection, but after coming from a PS3 and Wii, the 360 doesn't even feel like it's designed for people interested in gaming or media consumption at all, which came as an utter shock to me, since everyone I know seems to enjoy theirs for those activities (and Sony isn't exactly known for quality products these days either). There's so much cruft and unnecessary nonsense between you and whatever you want to do on the 360 that it's extremely exasperating to do trivial tasks that are incredibly simple on the PS3. For instance, the only way I'm aware of to simply watch a video that's been downloaded to the local hard drive is to:
    1) Navigate to the Videos tab
    2) Select the option to view my video apps
    3) Launch one of the video apps, then wait for it to load
    4) Once it loads, navigate to my local videos
    5) Find the one I want then play it

    (I'm eager to be corrected by someone more knowledgeable, since I would love to know an easier way to do something so simple)

    And several of those steps involve navigating past tabs filled with image and video ads mixed in with actual content in a Metro-ish UI style. In contrast, on the PS3:
    1) Go to the Videos tab
    2) Find the one I want then play it

    And the only ad that you can't disable is some text scrolling in the top right corner (and it's oftentimes actually useful information related to sales or game launches in the PSN Store).

    At least Microsoft had the good sense to not have the audio enabled automatically on the video ads that are constantly showing in the dashboard. Even so, it's rather jarring when you accidentally scroll over one of them and suddenly get blaring sound as they respond to the controller's focus on them. I don't know what the numbers are, but, at least to me, it feels like the majority of the UI elements in the dashboard are actually ads of some form, without only a few useful things present. Unfortunately, since they've mixed them all together, it's rather difficult to discern at a glance sometimes.

    And don't get me started on the fact that even though I can watch Netflix on my iPad, iPhone, Apple TV, Mac, Windows box, PS3, and Wii without having to pay anything extra, I have to be a Microsoft LIVE Gold subscriber if I want to watch it on my 360.

    1. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain. I force my Xbox to boot up in MCE mode (its an option in settings) and watch videos from there to avoid all that.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      For instance, the only way I'm aware of to simply watch a video that's been downloaded to the local hard drive is to: 1) Navigate to the Videos tab 2) Select the option to view my video apps 3) Launch one of the video apps, then wait for it to load 4) Once it loads, navigate to my local videos 5) Find the one I want then play it

      (I'm eager to be corrected by someone more knowledgeable, since I would love to know an easier way to do something so simple)

      Allow me.
      1. Press the guide button
      2. Scroll right to the media tab
      3. Select video player
      Downloaded videos are at the top of the list. It seems as though they've replicated much of the old-style NXE menus on the Xbox guide.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    3. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Don't your steps just replace my 1-3 (or 1-4?) with a different 1-3? That's genuine curiosity, not an attempt at an argument. I haven't explored that particular part of the interface much yet (it feels VERY out of place), so I honestly don't know.

    4. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      The number of steps may be the same, but with the way I've given you only have three button presses (compared to the nine you have to do now) and no waiting for the list of video apps.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    5. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      In that case, many, MANY thanks. I really appreciate it, since that'll prove useful. I'll have to see what else is tucked in that part of the interface.

    6. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, whatever promotions and stuff on the dash, the guide button is the only way to fly. They even put a big fucking button in the middle of the controller, that lights up!

    7. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet that is the ultimate purpose of Metro. That myriad of rectangles on your screen is there to facilitate mixing animated ads into the display.

    8. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by Teckla · · Score: 1

      ...but after coming from a PS3 and Wii...

      I was excited when I unexpectedly received an Xbox 360 as a Christmas present. I thought I could sell my Wii, which my wife and I use only for streaming Netflix.

      To my severe disappointment, Microsoft wants me to pay $5/month for the privilege of streaming Netflix movies on the Xbox 360 (that is, on top of the normal Netflix bill).

      No other device I'm aware of charges extra for this (Wii, PS3, Windows, Mac, Roku, Tivo, etc.)

      Fucking Microsoft and their nickel and dime shit.

    9. Re:Having purchased a 360 less than a month ago... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      And the only ad that you can't disable is some text scrolling in the top right corner (and it's oftentimes actually useful information related to sales or game launches in the PSN Store).

      I hated this ad for the PS3, and it pissed me off that you couldn't disable it on what was otherwise a superbly configurable device. I ended up using a hack and setting the console system date a year into the future (or the past, I forget).

  18. No indie games on PS3 by tepples · · Score: 2

    What's the PS3's counterpart to Xbox Live Indie Games (not Xbox Live Arcade)?

    1. Re:No indie games on PS3 by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Minis

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:No indie games on PS3 by Narishma · · Score: 1

      PlayStation Mobile.
      Granted, it's still in beta and isn't yet available for PS3, but better late than never.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    3. Re:No indie games on PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OtherOS, or the newer version where they quite generously just gave everyone their private signing keys.

    4. Re:No indie games on PS3 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Doesn't developing for PlayStation Mobile require doing a multi-year apprenticeship in Austin, Boston, or Seattle before starting your company, just like developing for the disc or Minis or WiiWare? The Wikipedia article you linked mentions "established software houses".

  19. Metro / Windows 8? by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

    Since the change I've hardly used my Xbox, and have moved pretty much to the PC. I'm sensitive to this kind crap.

    This is my biggest worry is that they're going to pull the same trick with Metro. It's the advertiser's dream, and the one way they'll beat Google. They control the platform, they control the ads.

    1. Re:Metro / Windows 8? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If you've seen Win8 pre-releases, a Metro start screen still shows what you as a user want to see there - you pick and choose what tiles to pin. An app could technically use its tile notifications to spam ads (though I don't know how that would go with Windows Store licensing agreement), but you can always kill that.

  20. Well then, the math is still simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We don't share this information publicly but we can tell you that, since 2010, the advertising business has grown 142%"

    Therefore, because Microsoft has been making so much revenue from other sources, the price of an XBox Live membership must have been reduced correspondingly large amounts since 2010, right?

  21. Living-room games by tepples · · Score: 1

    Just because it's not the uber-hardcore gaming machine you're expecting does not make it bad. If you really want that go build a PC.

    I thought the whole draw of a console over a PC was living-room games. Not enough people have a PC in the living room to convince major publishers to fund living-room games for PC. Sure, a lot of Slashdot's base does, but the living room PC market is a rounding error compared to the console market.

    But as long as it plays games

    That's the entire point of the article: a console doesn't "play games" if it makes it too hard for the user to find games.

    1. Re:Living-room games by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      For a long time, it has seemed strange to me that a component/system manufacturer like ASUS hasn't built Linux distro that just plays media and games with a console interface. If they took Linux, added on XBMC, skinned it so that it appeared to be a console, and sold it with one of their motherboard already in a nice consolly case, they would be in the console market selling hardware at a profit. OK, they would need to do a little more than that. They would need to make the system hide anything Linuxy. That shouldn't be very hard. My TV already does it. If I didn't know what to look for, I would never know that it was a Linux system.

      One of the big benefits that someone like ASUS would have with this is that they wouldn't need to manufacture a lot of custom parts. One of their already in production mother boards would be just fine. Other than the case, they wouldn't need to bring any new manufacturing on line to do it. Plus, the system would have 'Boot to Other OS' by default, and that other OS would be Windows.

  22. No one else owns a media center PC by tepples · · Score: 1

    why would I pay 15 dollars a month, when I can just build a media center PC on the cheap?

    Because not enough other people are willing to "just build a media center PC on the cheap". Without a significant user base owning media center PCs, major video game developers aren't going to target media center PCs. Hence why fighting games (apart from SFIV and MUGEN) and Mario Party-style games almost never get ported to the PC.

    1. Re:No one else owns a media center PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that most people don't want to hookup a pc to there tv, but they are missing out! My wife loves our media pc, she spends more time on it than her laptop. With a super charged video card and ample memory, we watch Netflix instead of cable and are happy campers. And with a long dvi cable our box is neatly tucked away out of view. We have a wireless keyboard and mouse so cable wise we have no issues. If you do it right, it's the best solution I've found for watching stuff without ads.

    2. Re:No one else owns a media center PC by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you do it right, [a home theater PC is] the best solution I've found for watching stuff without ads.

      So why haven't more PC makers promoted doing it right?

  23. Product placement by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Same reason why I will never have cable, and would cancel netflix in an instant if they ever showed a single advertisement on streaming.

    Add The Wizard (1989) to your queue. Watch it. Realized you just watched a 90 minute infomercial for Virtual Console on Wii. Cancel Netflix.

    1. Re:Product placement by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am of an age that I remember that move was an informercial for the powerglove not a console.

  24. I just stay offline on the 360 & boot to game by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    This is why I stay offline on the 360. I never saw a reason to pay if they're displaying ads. The only time I connect is for title updates and for XBLA games I can't find on PSN. And yes, I'm waiting a year+ for FEZ because of this crap.

    On a side note, the fact that the UI keeps changing on the 360 just makes me turn on the "boot to game disc" option. I really can't stand navigating the "dashboard." I feel like I'm going back to a supermarket that constantly rearranges their displays and products. I wouldn't stand for this on my PC's OS, nor within an application, and it's incredibly annoying to have to put up with it on a console's. I'm glad the PS3 and Wii's have stayed the same during their lifetime.

    To me, a console is just a game machine and that's what I want it for. It can do other things, but let me customize the UI so I can ignore that stuff, otherwise I just won't buy it and I'll stick to the competition. I'm sure at least the Wii U won't be doing this kind of BS, and if that's the last console I own, so be it.

  25. XBLIG by tepples · · Score: 1

    Is there anything on Live these days that is really that unique of an experience?

    Yes. The other consoles have nothing like Xbox Live Indie Games.

    1. Re:XBLIG by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      "Indie Games" shouldn't be called indie games, becuase most of them are from established mobile development houses. Don't call Rovio indie when they did J2ME games for YEARS. Most of the other so called "indie" game makers also have professional chops. They're just not as big as Nintendo or Blizzard or EA. Some people may fawn over the "indie game scene" for "street cred" but at the end of the day, the'll be playing the same AAA games everyone else is.

  26. Re:Is that legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but aren't there some parts of the US where this could be considered socialism ...

    Socialism? Seriously?

    but I'd just assume not have a visit from the police. :/

    Tinfoil hat a little snug today?

  27. Not new, not special by sarysa · · Score: 0

    There are ads that load in when you connect to PSN. However, most of those ads are for games/videos you can download from PSN.

    Same thing goes for Xbox Live. I'm an XBL user and I didn't really notice the change that much, because it's no different than what Google is doing with Android Market and what Apple does with its iOS and Mac App Stores. The great majority of ads are for games or game trailers -- Microsoft is just honest about it. ("ADVERTISEMENT" is displayed by the ads)

    The blanket term for this phenomenon is "featured content", and it is indeed a coveted piece of real estate on any platform.

    --
    Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    1. Re:Not new, not special by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are ads that load in when you connect to PSN. However, most of those ads are for games/videos you can download from PSN.

      Same thing goes for Xbox Live. I'm an XBL user and I didn't really notice the change that much, because it's no different than what Google is doing with Android Market and what Apple does with its iOS and Mac App Stores.

      It's completely different.

      Apple and Google relegate their advertising to their app stores - you know, a special place specifically designed for you to go and buy stuff? It would be the same thing, if every time you turned on your Android or iDevice, you were smacked upside the head with ad after ad, but that's not the case.

      Also worth noting, Apple and Google don't charge you for the privilege.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Not new, not special by sarysa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is, the default setting if you have a disc (XBL gold or not) is for that disc to play. If that disc has multiplayer and you're logged into XBL, multiplayer just works -- you're not force fed advertisements at any time. Messages are primarily sent through the little Xbox-button menu which is usable both in and out of game. Achievements can be browsed this way as well, and friends can also be searched this way. No ads there either.

      The point I'm trying to make is the Xbox Live landing page is typically for users who are looking for something else. It's not all that different than Google Play (I used the outdated name earlier) or App Store if you really think about user behavior. You pretend to spend $200-300 on a phone (in reality it's thousands over two years) and when you're looking for content, you're first shown featured content -- not a bland search screen or category listing. The console's core purpose of being a gaming device is no more compromised by the Xbox landing page than smartphones are by their respective market pages. I mean, it sucks that you can't go and put your Arcade games/indie games/netflix/whatever on the landing page, but I don't remember ever being able to.

      If Silver members see the ads/featuring then it's really not all that bad. You can buy $1000 worth of content on the App Store and the featured content isn't going to change.

      Not that anyone's claimed this, but I'm not a M$ employee, just an amateur devil's advocate.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    3. Re:Not new, not special by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has never been known to be a company that cares about consumers more than profit. Profit is their driving factor in everything they do from product lock-in, to implementing "Standards" in a way that is not conducive to said "Standards", to intentionally breaking competing products to increase sales of their own products, to forcing products on consumers to kill off competition.

      I am honestly surprised that anyone shows surprise when things like this happen or get brought out in to the spotlight. You know what they are, or could easily find out. If a person continually believes a pathological liar does that not make them a co-dependent?

      I have personally boycotted Microsoft for over a decade. No Zune, no Xbox, and Windows Desktop only when forced (Employer and Public Schools often require it's use). My kid has been very happy to back my decision, he loves his Play Stations, PSP, iPod, etc...

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:Not new, not special by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem with your idea is that Microsoft promotes buying games via the internet directly from them, and to launch them, you have to visit the dashboard, at which point you will see ads, and not just ads for games. Sometimes as a silver user you see ads for game demos, which is annoying because you're only allowed to download most of them if you have gold. The whole experience is frustrating and annoying.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Not new, not special by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. The first (and last) ad I saw before I pulled the network cable wasn't for any game, it was for some "University of Phoenix" type diploma mill.

    6. Re:Not new, not special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dashboard layout seemed to be designed by committee, with no strong vision of how to make it work well.

      Well from whose perspective; it delivers ads doesn't it.

      He also said that other services do better in terms of game discovery and promotion, including the PlayStation Network.

      Just because it's a gaming console doesn't mean McSoftware should be precluded from delivering ads from anyone that will pay the freight, does it?

      I asked Microsoft about the inability to find games, and was offered a pat answer. âoeA core principal for advertising on Xbox LIVE is to invite... the user to use Bing (so we can deliver even more advertising)... Now you can search for your favorite entertainment using simple voice commands.â

      There, problems fixed. (Because Mr. Balmer doesn't care about anything but short term revenue growth.)

      My key word was, "lavatory." How fitting.

    7. Re:Not new, not special by VGPowerlord · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thing is, the default setting if you have a disc (XBL gold or not) is for that disc to play.

      I have a disc in my 360 now and I never changed the default settings for game discs.

      Lets see what happens when I turn it on.

      Xbox 360 logo... Choose a profile screen... signing into Xbox Live...

      OK, I was deposited at the Main Menu's "home" tab with 7 boxes. They are:

      1. Upper-left corner: Small box, Alan Wake (the disc currently in the console)
      2. Lower-left corner: Small box, Quickplay (for accessing my XBLA games)
      3. Left-center: Large box the switches ads every 2 seconds between "Comic Con is On", "Crackle's The Unknown" (tv series?), "Call of Duty: Black Ops II", "Quantum Conundrum", and "Xbox Live Good, Better, Gold"
      4. Right-center-upper: Small box, ad for MLB & More
      5. Right-center-lower: Small box, ad for Arcade Sale
      6. Upper-right corner: Small box, ad for Kinect
      7. Lower-right corner: Small box, ad for Netflix

      My empirical evidence says you're wrong.

      Oh, and if you're referring to what happens when you put a disc in, the main menu has likely already loaded and you've already seen the ads.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    8. Re:Not new, not special by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      If that disc has multiplayer and you're logged into XBL, multiplayer just works -- you're not force fed advertisements at any time.

      Indeed, works every time, those three little red lights aren't trying to sell you anything (ZING!)

    9. Re:Not new, not special by sarysa · · Score: 1

      Hrm, it's different for me. I got my Xbox 360 in 2008, and back then it loaded the game on startup. I did change the setting a couple years ago because I use it for Netflix.

      My empirical evidence is: Hazy but accurate. :)

      Even if I'm wrong, you can just go into System Settings --> Startup and Shutdown --> Startup --> Disc to make it play from disc. I know I'm going to get a lot of hate for saying this, but seeing an ad once isn't going to give you AlzAIDScer. (though I just played D&D Daggerdale for PC all afternoon -- now that's something to nerdrage about...)

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
  28. About that 142% growth. by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

    "We don't share this information publicly but we can tell you that, since 2010, the advertising business has grown 142%"

    If their was dollar value worth bragging about, even with vague allusions, you could be sure that they'd be doing it. The fact that they would instead resort such an obvious attempt to impress you without providing any basis for arriving at an impressive conclusion yourself, suggests that they are blowing smoke.

    Which is actually more aggravating. They will continue to try to squeeze money out of this rock, to the detriment of their core customer base, just because some piddly revenue that isn't even worth mentioning is nonetheless being pursued by some bean counter.

    1. Re:About that 142% growth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it's the opposite. They make vast sums of money from advertising, but don't want people to do the math and realize that with the advertising revenue Microsoft could make XBox Live free rather than subscription, and still make a profit.

  29. Other OS is dead since 3.21 by tepples · · Score: 1

    Other OS is dead since 3.21, and anybody who releases using the "just gave everyone their private signing keys" route to market will likely meet the same fate as George Hotz.

    1. Re:Other OS is dead since 3.21 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other OS is dead since 3.21, and anybody who releases using the "just gave everyone their private signing keys" route to market will likely meet the same fate as George Hotz.

      And really this is why geohotz fucked everyone over and can be simply and generically referred here-to-fore as a "sell out".

      George Hotz took a settlement offer from Sony. Let's be clear about that. George Hotz pretended to care about your right to do as you please with your hardware, but settling with Sony proved my point.

      Also, I would like to see that case go to court. The one where someone used the publicly available private signing keys (lol?) on old-model PS3s that have had OtherOS removed, to restore OtherOS. AFAIK that hasn't happened yet. I think most likely the details of the settlement arrangement hinges on some clause where he was using those keys to grant new-model PS3s that weren't "designed" for OtherOS new abilities Sony didn't "intend" them to have.

    2. Re:Other OS is dead since 3.21 by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Other OS is dead since 3.21, and anybody who releases using the "just gave everyone their private signing keys" route to market will likely meet the same fate as George Hotz.

      Free high-end sports car and education? Well, OK, not free persay...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  30. No public Minis SDK by tepples · · Score: 2

    This article claims that it's too hard for a startup to become licensed to develop Minis. It's not like the iOS App Store, where anyone with $300 a year ($600 per 3 years for a Mac and $100 per year for a certificate) can release software.

  31. Blocking Xbox Ads by SeanDS · · Score: 2

    I have blocked the ads on the dashboard by having my router block the following sites:

    msnvideoweb.vo.msecnd.net
    rad.msn.com

    Unfortunately, it retains the ads provided by Microsoft themselves, which are, I think provided by the same domain as the actual Xbox Live services (i.e. unblockable if you want to continue using your Xbox online). Also, you still have the god awful presence of Bing Search in your dashboard, whether you like it or not. I cannot find a way to remove Bing like it is possible to remove other crapware that Microsoft installed along with the latest update (like the 'Zune' app - why the HELL would I ever want that?).

    One thing's for certain, I'm going to stick with PC gaming (or more specifically, Linux gaming) from now on. Consoles are steadily going from being a platform for games, with pretty graphics you might otherwise not be able to get on a PC, to a direct line into your living room for the big media companies to sell you more shit. I block ads on websites, and the text-based ones that get through are never clicked. If a website's 'sign up' process gets in the way of the information I want, I either don't use it or I give them a temporary email address. I use price comparison websites to find the best price, then go to the seller directly rather than clicking through. I hate companies that make money without performing any real innovation online, and I try hard to avoid letting them make any money from my online presence. Microsoft first and foremost.

  32. This is better by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 2

    See when you don't pirate, pay lots of money for games and hardware, do everything you are told like a good little boy. You get rewarded with beautiful ads. Isn't it so much better when you follow the rules?

  33. I bought a PS3 because of XBOX Live... by MikeD83 · · Score: 1

    I bought an XBOX 360 even though my friends had the PS3. I figured that by paying for XBOX Live I was paying for a quality service. I play Call of Duty online and the service was fine. Most of the time I was the "game host" thanks to my FIOS internet connection from Verizon. Everything was fine until Call of Duty Black Ops. There were constant issues with online play. It was so bad I called XBOX Live and they created a trouble ticket. After two weeks of no improvement I called XBOX Live to check the status of my ticket. The person on the phone told me that they didn't have a ticket for me and that if I had a problem playing the game online I should call Activision.

    There was no was in hell I was calling Activision; I told the representative they would either fix the problem or I would buy a PS3. The XBOX Live representative told me to buy a PS3. That night I purchased a PS3 and Call of Duty Black Ops for PS3. I haven't turned on the XBOX since and my only regret was ever buying an XBOX in the first place.

    Microsoft is crafting an interesting strategy with XBOX Live and I can only expect it will alienate their customers. Increasing advertising, poor quality; why the hell would anyone want to pay for that crap?

    1. Re:I bought a PS3 because of XBOX Live... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "why the hell would anyone want to pay for that crap?"

      Because as bad as it is, it isn't fucking Sony.

  34. Forget The Ads The Real Issue is Finding Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ads don't bother me. What bothers me is when a friend tells me to check out the newest Halo video. Its so fucking hard to find game trailers or additional content. Gone are the days of just going to game videos. Also I don't know who's in charge of featured content but I don't care about the highlights from last years comic con.

  35. Blame the MPAA by tepples · · Score: 1

    how easy it would be to kill Redbox by allowing me to rent movies I can't find on Netflix at a competitive price

    Microsoft is not the company to blame for that. Try blaming Disney, Fox, Paramount, Sony, Universal, and Warner Bros.

  36. $60 for console or 2*$40 for PC by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why not use an htpc/gaming pc? You can get most of the xobx games for windows

    The kind of game that works best on a console is the kind of game that works best in the living room, and that tends toward fighting games and party games. Are Mortal Kombat (2011) and the other Xbox 360 fighting games ported, or is the fighting section of the PC aisle just Street Fighter IV and more Street Fighter IV?

    no subscriptions for basic multiplayer access, the games on windows tend to come out a few $ cheaper

    You're right about single-player games. But for two players, you're far more likely to need two machines and two copies of the game on a PC than on a console because major developers assume that nobody owns an HTPC. Compare $60 for one copy of a $60 console game to $80 for two copies of a $40 PC game. It gets even more expensive if your kids are gamers too, or if your family expects you to host the entertainment at annual reunions.

  37. Drooooid by tepples · · Score: 1

    They would need to make the system hide anything Linuxy.

    Android already hides anything Linuxy. Get more games supporting Bluetooth gamepads and add gamepad support to Android's UI, and ASUS might have the chance to make a version of its Transformer/Nexus 7 product line with an EeeBox case as a low-end console filling a niche similar to that of the Wii.

  38. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who knew that a walled garden could hold a captive audience.

  39. Warning: Blatant PS3 Fanboyism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you get for trusting Microsoft. We have a PS3 and Xbox 360, and anything that can be done on both I do on the PS3 for this very reason. Doing anything on the 360 is a chore.

    Sony is far, FAR from a perfect company, but at least they know how to make clean, efficient interfaces. Microsoft has apparently forgotten their own adage, It doesn't matter if it works, only that it looks like it works. This is what has driven half of all MS sales, but something they seem to forget at the drop of a hat.

  40. SUCKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been saying for YEARS that X-Box Live is a fucking scam. Why the hell am I paying Microshit for the privilege of using my own net connection that I'm already paying for? Why am I paying them for "features" I get for free on the PSN? Sure they're not exactly identical but just ask any PS3 owner...it doesn't really matter. It's close enough.

    But ignore all that. Basically X-Box live is going the way of cable TV: you pay a subscription to it, and yet you STILL get bombarded with advertising. You are paying to be marketed to. And it's bullshit through and through.

  41. Stop Whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is a corporation, which is a way of structuring an organization for the purpose of earning revenue for its shareholders. They have a fiduciary responsibility to those shareholders to extract as much of your hard-earned money as possible without violating any laws. If that bothers people, then they should spend their money elsewhere.

  42. I don't want to be limited to just games by elabs · · Score: 1

    I want more! I admit that the game discovery could be improved on the 360. But I don't want to just play games anymore. What I really want is apps! I want useful apps, fun apps (games), media apps, social apps and educational apps. Most of all I want apps that can interact with each other like the charms feature in Windows 8. I want to be able to take a snapshot in a game, send that over to my image editing app then make it my backdrop or send it to a friend.

  43. As someone who is reatively new to the XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the ads so much that I mind, but the whole interface when you turn it on is a fucking mess.

  44. Re:'Customers' are the product for more than just by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Xbox Live is in the unique situation of being able to sell ads to the end-user, sell the ability to access end-users (via Marketplace) to publishers/developers, and take a cut of those purchases between publisher and end-user.

    Yep, that's a unique situation, similar to the one Apple has with iOS, no?

  45. Live always was kind of silly, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Live was new (to me) in 2005-2006, I thought it was a silly idea - paying for match-making when the multiplayer games still are peer-to-peer. The rallying cry was that it was just soooooo good that it was worth the cash. So like most people, I paid for my Live subscription every year and promptly forgot about it until re-up time.

    Fast forward to now - my Live subscription just expired and I have no interest in re-upping it. Looking at it, the rationale above actually still holds water, but additionally considering the (IMO) over-abundance of advertising, having to pay for Live to access other paid services (e.g. Netflix), and the general good-enough-ness of PSN for my PS3 - there's just no reason to pay for Live.

    Stepping back even further, it's vaguely annoying how extreme Microsoft has gone to monetize the Xbox. Sony takes a lot of heat, but Microsoft has always been far more aggressive in treating me like a consumer than a gamer:

    1. Having to pay extra for multiplayer
    2. Proprietary USB interfaces
    3. Non-standard hard drive upgrades
    4. Pay extra for rechargeable controllers
    5. Up until the Xbox Slim, if you wanted wireless, it was extra
    6. Xbox Live "points" that can only be bought in bundles in the Xbox Marketplace
    7. Having to pay for Live to access my already-paid-for Netflix account
    8. Proprietary Bluetooth interfaces (AFAIK, I can't hook up a standard BT earpiece to my Xbox)

    I just feel milked by the whole thing, I'm opting out.

  46. You are the product by Mozai · · Score: 1

    I'm reminded of the newspaper envelopes around actual newspapers that are made up to look like genuine journal reporting, but they're actually four full-page adverts attached to the outside of the newspaper you paid for.

  47. If it didn't work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they wouldn't do it.

  48. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can proudly say that I have not spent -one single cent- on Xbox Live. I have bought a couple of games and tried some demos but that's about it. I've been leaning towards the PC for gaming the last few years and that has made that much easier. When I found out that Xbox Live was an additional 'fee'.. I simply said no.. and so should all of you. I don't mind ad based platforms but you're going to try and charge me for it too? Nah.. not going to happen. I even ditched cable over 12 years ago. Vote with your wallet folks! If Sony is smart, they will keep the next Playstation as it is and maybe this will be a pivotal selling point for them this time around.