Slashdot Mirror


Sony DVR Useless After Rovi Stops TV Guide OnScreen

New submitter speedlaw writes "Rovi has just announced that they are stopping the TV Guide OnScreen service as of April 13th, 2013. This was announced via the service itself. This is an on-air listing service that provides listings over the air, as part of an OTA TV signal. Many devices, notably the Sony HDD 250 and 500 Digital Video Recorders, will no longer function without the clock-set data this stream provides. When other companies decide to stop supporting something, they don't make older systems useless. Worse, Sony never came out with another DVR in the U.S. market. Why do we have to rent them? How do we get Sony or Rovi to provide at least a software patch to set the clock so the DVR can at least retain 1980s VCR functionality? Sony admits there is no fix. A thread on AVS forums has a bunch of information on TV Guide OnScreen. The TV stations who broadcast the data have been ordered by Rovi to disconnect the data inserters and ship them back. I have a TiVo, and yes, I know all about HTPC, but this data stream was 'lifetime listings' like TiVo has 'lifetime listings' — now that Rovi is looking to cut service, my two DVR units are about to become useless."

321 comments

  1. SUNDAY PAPER TV GUIDE RULES !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    One more reason to buy the Sunday Times !!

    1. Re:SUNDAY PAPER TV GUIDE RULES !! by symbolset · · Score: 1

      We don't have that option here any more. And our local paper is now more of a leaflet.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:SUNDAY PAPER TV GUIDE RULES !! by stox · · Score: 1

      The Chicago Tribune dropped the Sunday paper TV guide. You can now buy is separately.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  2. What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why don't the channels just broadcast the programme data alongside the actual programming? That's how they do it here, in the DVB-T streams. A full week's worth of programming and programme descriptions, transmitted over the air.

    1. Re:What are the channels doing? by jonwil · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats what happens here in Australia too, the networks broadcast program data over-the-air through the DVB-T streams. How far into the future depends on the network but all of them do it.

    2. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROVI sends listings of all of the network channels you could get regardless of delivery method. E.g. you can get the listings for cable or OTA through the service.

      My ATSC tuner shows upcoming program data but it is limited in how far ahead it shows.

    3. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      #firstworldproblems

    4. Re:What are the channels doing? by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It probably violates someone's copyright or patent. Or that's what they think may be the case. Better be safe than sorry, consumers be damned. They're anyway supposed to just consume the advertising with intermittant fragments of some mildly entertaining show, instead fo recording it and remove the ads.

    5. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Rovi claims patents in the EPG field.

    6. Re:What are the channels doing? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    7. Re:What are the channels doing? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually the very first VCR my parent's owned got the programming directly from teletext. You could go to the page where the program is listed, select the page, and it would take the data directly from that page and store it (and it even got the correct VPS times that way, in cases they differed from scheduled times). That was before the invention of ShowView, the system which presumably was making programming your VCR so simple. I've never understood why entering a seemingly arbitrary number should be more easy than just selecting directly from the program table. Indeed, that was the easiest to program VCR I've ever come across, and superior to all the systems which came later, without exceptions. And it worked perfectly for more than a decade (apart from a nasty Y2K bug which you had to work around by lying about the year) until the VCR stopped working correctly (and it was not the programming part that failed)

      And of course, if the stations had ever stopped to provide programming data over teletext, the VCR had also the option to enter everything manually.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:What are the channels doing? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't state where you are but they also broadcast the data on DVB-T in the UK, and the Sony recorders are still next to useless. They used some proprietary data source that died a few years ago and now the best you can manage is 1980s VCR like functionality where you program the clock and then a recording time and channel. Not exactly the experience you expect with a high end high price DVR.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:What are the channels doing? by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These days? Because if they did that, then people could record the shows, and skip the ads. And that would be terrible.

      At least if you're a TV network who wants to milk the most ad money you possibly can. Don't forget, getting up to go to the bathroom during the commercials is theft.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    10. Re:What are the channels doing? by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you think this is bad wait a couple of more years for smart tv's to start needing these kinds of updates.

      People expect their tv's to last 10+ years without a simple software update some of those tv's won't be working right.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    11. Re:What are the channels doing? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great that I'm already in the bathroom that I can express what I think of that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It probably violates someone's copyright or patent. Or that's what they think may be the case.

      Love how this is +5 Insightful.

      Can you back this statement up in any way, however tenious?

    13. Re:What are the channels doing? by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An area of computer tech NOT mired in bogus trivial patents? THAT would be the thing that you need to defend. The original jaded comments were very much consistent with the state of current patent law.

      Just consider Tivos own patents and the fact that someone else sitting on a patent jury managed to get a redundant patent.

      The PTO can't even keep track of it's own nonsense.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This device just needs a firmware update. Check out the back panel http://www.spiffspace.com/pictures/hdd250_back_large.jpg it has USB, get a bunch of nerds together and build an image that supports USB Ethernet, wireless, etc. Fire up a Samba server while you're at it...

    15. Re:What are the channels doing? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It was meant to be Funny, not Insightful. At least the part about copyrights and patents.

    16. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They *do* broadcast this data alongside the actual programming in the United States, just like in Europe and Australia. I have no idea why the Sony box relies on a "Rovi" stream to set the clock, as the standard alternative is available!

    17. Re:What are the channels doing? by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you think this is bad wait a couple of more years for smart tv's to start needing these kinds of updates.

      I know. I'm wandering around various stores laughing at these 'Smart TVs' with stuff like YouTube and Netflix on them and thinking to myself 'What happens when this needs a major update in a couple of years, someone changes their interfaces or Netflix goes bust?'. It'll also be a cold day in hell before I plug an ethernet cable into a TV and give it access to the internet. I hate to be cynical, but us technical people always know this crap goes badly wrong.

      If I want this shit I will plug my computer into the TV. In the meantime just display the damn picture on the screen.

    18. Re:What are the channels doing? by rworne · · Score: 5, Informative

      You do not need to wait a couple of years. I purchased a Samsung TV (LN-750B model - although not for the smart TV functions) and they promised all sorts of applets for the TV. Netflix being one of them.

      9 months later, a new model comes out and Samsung releases a firmware update for my model. What does it do? Locks the set to the last available firmware and makes it unmodifiable. Then they drop all support.

      Netflix never appeared for it either. Better to have an expensive "dumb" TV and a cheap smart box to attach to it.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    19. Re:What are the channels doing? by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the issues with this method is that each channel only sends its own guide data, as they have no incentive to let you know what is showing on other channels. This is the way it is done in the US.

      The problem is that to see what's on another channel, your TV has to tune to that channel. If the TV has enough memory and the channels send data for long enough, the TV can just do this sort of tuning when it is "turned off" and it would work fine. But, without memory or extended guide data, there is no way to check the guide for channels that you are not watching without stopping viewing of live TV.

      A DVR should always have plenty of memory, and if it has more than one tuner then most of the time you shouldn't have an issue even without extended guide data, but without extended data, there would be times that shows would not record because all tuners were in use for current recordings and could not be used to see what's coming up.

    20. Re:What are the channels doing? by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It'll also be a cold day in hell before I plug an ethernet cable into a TV and give it access to the internet.

      My TV has an Ethernet connection and can do things like show YouTube and Netflix. I don't care about any of those extras because other cheaper devices can also do this for me.

      But, the Ethernet connection does give me an easy way to apply updates (one has already improved picture quality), and stream media from a PC. The TV also has a web browser that is good enough to allow basic browsing, and works pretty well if you add a bluetooth keyboard. With bookmarks, you can do things like check the local weather without even needing a keyboard. This means that you can do some things without having to have another device involved. You can also control the TV using an Android or iOS app.

      So, yeah, when they stop supporting the TV with updates, some of this functionality will stop, but there is a lot that an Ethernet connection gives you that will never go away.

    21. Re:What are the channels doing? by westlake · · Score: 1

      I'm wandering around various stores laughing at these 'Smart TVs' with stuff like YouTube and Netflix on them and thinking to myself 'What happens when this needs a major update in a couple of years, someone changes their interfaces or Netflix goes bust?'

      You'll shop the app store or download the firmware upgrade just as you do now with your video game console or set top box.

    22. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      same. I have the LN40B630. There was I think only a couple firmware updates since I bought it. Same with my LG Blu Ray player, and the last one of which farked up my DVD quality.

    23. Re:What are the channels doing? by bedouin · · Score: 1

      t'll also be a cold day in hell before I plug an ethernet cable into a TV and give it access to the internet.

      My Sony TV supports DLNA. I run PS3 Media Server on my Mac and Linux box and can stream all my movies, with subtitles, without using another set top box. It has Facebook, YouTube and all that, but DLNA was the only reason I bothered attaching a network cable to it. I didn't even want a net enabled TV but the 'dumb' version didn't have as many input options.

      Its Skype widget can support a fucking webcam but when you plug a USB keyboard in to use with its web browser an error appears stating, "Unsupported Device." Leave it to Sony.

    24. Re:What are the channels doing? by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      I don't think networks really want you to record anything, especially since you might you ad-skip. Having an open program info stream would just make it to easy. We don't want to make anything easy for the consumer do we?

    25. Re:What are the channels doing? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I don't think they care if you skip the ads, as long as they get the ratings, I doubt they even care if you're awake when you watch it.

    26. Re:What are the channels doing? by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      But what is the TV sending out?

    27. Re:What are the channels doing? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      My Panasonic smart TV uses the Freesat/Freeview EPG for setting up recordings, so is fortunately safe. Not every manufacturer is as shit as Sony.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:What are the channels doing? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually TV channels love controlling that data because they can lie about program start times to ensure you record the adverts before and after the programme. Even better if you have shows recording back-to-back on different channels they might be able to make the overlap large enough to cut off the first few minutes of their rival.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:What are the channels doing? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have a BD player act as a Netflix tuner unit for my DVR. Works great. (DVR is a mini, works silently sipping a mere 40w and taking no space) I'm keeping my TV off the net. Same for my BD player except when it's tuning Netflix or Hulu. Love firewalls :)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    30. Re:What are the channels doing? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Forgot to add an addendum - don't need the BD player either anymore - it's amazing what you can do with 2 minis.... :)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    31. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been leery of updates, as they are often driven by others who see a profit opportunity by denying me something I thought I had bought, then re-offering it to me as a subscription, only to be denied at the next "upgrade".

      Maybe I bought my smart TV because I could set it to automatically record my shows. The one I bought allowed me to fast-forward through commercials on replay.

      Ok, I have already swallowed the bait of a nice TV. Paid in full. Time to set the hook.

      They offer me a "free upgrade" for "better picture quality" or "increased capabilities". Upon installation, I find my fast-forward function disabled It won't go back to previous mode, The TV now is quite useless to me. It might not even fall back to being a plain old VGA monitor. Business types goad Congress into passing tough law to keep us from reversing their trickery.

      Why would I want to own such a thing? If there is anything out there I want to see, I am going to try like the dicken to get it converted to standard formats and protocols so it can be archived or displayed on anything. Remember the old ASCII codes, which were readable no matter which computer/architecture/OS one used? We seem to be rapidly getting away from standards so a very few can reap huge profits from licensing proprietary formats - formats that can be denied at a stroke of a pen.

      It miffs me off a lot to see businessmen succumbing to this kind of data extortion. Willingly trading their local expertise for promises of "support".

      Cars are even worse. I am so fed up with proprietary interfaces and codes I could scream - all I know to do at this point is maintain old cars ( pre 1974 in California ), converting them to fuel injection ( megasquirt ), and at least have something serviceable. Pre-1974 because of smog control laws. I have to keep my 1976 carbureted car as is ( despite its terrible gas mileage and you can smell raw gas all around it because of its antiquated mechanical carburetor and choking mechanism ), yet if I "tamper" with it, some clown at DMV will fail it for "visual inspection" regardless of what the emissions meters read. Give people a badge, and they become part of the problem, and right now California still has a huge surplus of money for bureaucratic use - they get it from the school budget, then corral us for additional taxes for the schools. They know no-one would vote for yet more bureaucracy, but that's exactly what they did in the last election - voted themselves yet another tax.

      'nuff said. I will post this AC, because I always get downmodded if I post when I am mad.... and thinking about this made me plenty mad.

    32. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean to say technical? Cynical? Paranoid?

    33. Re:What are the channels doing? by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Other than DHCP request packets, nothing that I don't control. It can search my network for DNLA servers, but only if I enable that. It can be set to automatically check for new firmware and alert me, but it can't be set to automatically download and install it.

      Everything else is some sort of immediate request (e.g., "play this YouTube video", "browse to this website", etc.).

    34. Re:What are the channels doing? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "... they have no incentive to let you know what is showing on other channels."

      There is a ridiculously simple -- and INEXPENSIVE -- solution to this problem:

      [1] Each broadcast or cable channel publishes its schedule and program info to a central database at the FCC.

      [2] The FCC broadcasts -- free -- all this information, on a specified band and standardized format.

      [3] Problem disappears.

    35. Re:What are the channels doing? by halltk1983 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry, you made sense. Please leave.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    36. Re:What are the channels doing? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      This is one of the reasons why they can't compete with "piracy". Once the cat is out of the bag as far as features are concerned, you can't just tell consumers they can't have it. Some features are so ridiculously attractive to consumer that not offering it is simply not an option. You might hate it, but you can forget about fighting it.

      Combine attractive features with the practically free costs and that's a battle you almost can't win.

      Sony, surprise, surprise, surprise, are acting like morons again. The last thing they want is to encourage, or otherwise push, consumers towards "piracy". Once there, it is a near impossible fight to get them to be a consumer again.

    37. Re:What are the channels doing? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Each broadcast or cable channel publishes its schedule and program info to a central database at the FCC.

      That's a big problem, though it would create a few jobs.

      Stations have about a few million different ways of publishing the data - it's something that companies like TV Guide and Tribune end up having to fix up. You won't believe how the TV guide data comes in - sometimes it's a handwritten sheet with the upcoming shows. Maybe it's a printed grid they fax over daily. some of them have it electronically, of course in various formats (spreadsheets, word doc, XML, etc). Oh, and the typos, the typos...

      The value-add here is figuring out context - when your DVR can figure out if a show is new or not, or a rerun, or other channels the show is on, that's stuff that Tribune does when they key in the data into their show database which they sell to their subscribers.

      Of course, being able to pull this data from the FCC still means they will exist - they FCC data probably has very little information that Tribune etc. have to re-link (which stations are showing the same episode, new episodes, etc), so they'll still be around as basic guide data's fairly useless by itself (you want to catch the new episode? Oh, there are 3 stationns! I'll record all of them! Or your show has 194,293 showings this week. I'll record them all since I can't tell which is which).

      But yeah, the station schedules are a mess

    38. Re:What are the channels doing? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      "... they have no incentive to let you know what is showing on other channels."

      There is a ridiculously simple -- and INEXPENSIVE -- solution to this problem:

      In principle yes in practice no. Since the TV stations are in competition with each other it requires an independent provider to collate and display the TV guides, however these suppliers run the risk of incurring the ire of the TV stations so in some cases they have to have a "understanding" or pay each station, so if you as the consumer want this then you have to pay for it.

      Here in Australia (I assume the same for other countries) Foxtel displays all TV listings at least a week in advance and has been doing it for years. Depending on your subscription, if you have the set-top box (Foxtel - of course) with recording capabilities you can record up-to 2 channels at a time and watch another or playback what you have previously recorded. It must be noted that one commercial channel for years did not allow publishing of their TV guide.

      If you have free to air TV services you are really are at the mercy of the TV station management and/or the TV guide provider(s). You can complain all you want but if you expect a free service then too bad.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    39. Re:What are the channels doing? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      If you think this is bad wait a couple of more years for smart tv's to start needing these kinds of updates.

      People expect their tv's to last 10+ years without a simple software update some of those tv's won't be working right.

      I have a smart TV but I don't depend on a third party supplier to provide TV listings. Even though my TV can display from the internet and can use DLNA I mainly treat my TV as just a monitor and get most of my stations from Foxtel. As for games my TV automatically switches when I fire up my PS3 and switches back when I have finished. Even my PS3 can display TV channels although not the ones my wife or myself likes to watch.

      The trouble is that many people using free to air TV expect many things but when they are told a particular free service has finished they get upset.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    40. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we please mod this higher!

      Need... to... refrain... from... going... off... topic...

      ahhh what the hell... I had the same issue with Samsung, I purchased a smart tv and I was told of all of the applications that's going to be available etc... 2 years later I was still waiting. So a couple of months ago I decided to build a mega HTPC. Why?

      Samsung TV said it can play movies from USB, DLNA, other network connection : These were great features, and it was my first time purchasing a smarttv. But the problem was that it was incredibly slow to a point of unusable. Unless you had a lot of patience or you were exceptionally slow yourself.

      Samsung Applications - Didn't really happen, checked often and there was very little that was available. None the less it was slow. Some applications like the YouTube app required a keyboard to search to get to the meaningful videos. This was painful.

      TV Guide - this is the clincher. The TV guide was incredibly slow, traversing through it was so painfully slow that you simply wanted to avoid going to the guide at all cost. For this reason, I had my old iphone always near the tv to get teh online guides.

      I contacted Samsung several times and they said the issues that I was raising were not issues and I should have tested the tv first. So I had two choices, I either dump the tv on some poor sod, dump it in a landfill ... or use the TV has a simple screen. This way I can update components as and when I want it.

      So when ever someone now asks me about what TV to get, I always tell them get something with a good screen only. Don't get anything with all the other bells and whistles with it. Often you can find no-name brands with big name brand components (especially the screen).

      I think these other services that they offer is great, for those who are none the wiser. But for most people on ./ these new features that they keep trying to add are still quite segmented and not very integerated. You'll get a much better solution with a custom HTPC and TV card, or a dual tv card running with something like XBMC.

    41. Re:What are the channels doing? by pantaril · · Score: 1

      Why don't the channels just broadcast the programme data alongside the actual programming? That's how they do it here, in the DVB-T streams. A full week's worth of programming and programme descriptions, transmitted over the air.

      In most of the EU - it's copyright issue. Unlike in US, compilations or lists of data can be copyrighted (phone books, tv guides). TV stations sell their program guides to exclusive third parties, which then make compilations of TV guide data available for hefty price to cable broadcasters, tv magazines etc.

      There were attempts by volunteers to make EPG data available for free on web in xml format but vere quickly squashed by legal threads.

    42. Re:What are the channels doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After InView (4TV) switched off the EPG broadcast in the UK, Sony offered a £100 trade-in on certain DVD recorders via their website. These recorders were available elsewhere for around £120 cheaper than the sony website. See http://stuckinstandby.co.cc/4tv-inview-epg-switch-off-latest

      Beko offered a £70 cash refund to owners of recently purchased Digifusion PVRs.

      If only they'd open source the code for these, but I guess there are lots of third-parties involved, license agreements, etc.

    43. Re:What are the channels doing? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Stations have about a few million different ways of publishing the data - it's something that companies like TV Guide and Tribune end up having to fix up. You won't believe how the TV guide data comes in - sometimes it's a handwritten sheet with the upcoming shows."

      That was part of my point. Although looking back I guess I didn't spell it out explicitly. They would be required to supply the data to the FCC in a standard format. Something like date and time (UTC), duration, summary of less than X words, etc. And I suppose provision would have to be made for an overall description of the show, if it's part of a series.

      Other businesses have standard data formats... I see no reason companies involved in television should be exempt.

    44. Re:What are the channels doing? by servant · · Score: 1

      They do here in TN, but it depends on the station. Fairly often the windows computers are down or otherwise flanged. I email the various station broadcast engineers or station manager if I can't find the Engr's, and tell them it isn't updating, the times reported are wrong, not broadcasting, etc. Often the Windows XP machines running the software is hung because of 'automatic updates', BSOD, didn't restart after a reboot, or just hung. Some stations just choose NOT to broadcast it. Often on Sundays and sometimes other times, the programming is just wrong, or for some reason didn't download the programming. Normally the programming is downloaded a week or more ahead of time, but it does get 'flanged' sometimes and is not detected because this is not considered an important service by most stations.

      Locally the service has gotten better especially after my 3rd or 4th email (I try not to do more than 1 every 24 hours). But that I am afraid I am thought of as an annoyance, so setting up automated monitoring or automatic system reboots weekly after a while ups their apparent reliability.

      At least that is my perception and my story.

      --
      ... "When you pry the source from my cold dead hands."
    45. Re:What are the channels doing? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Stations have about a few million different ways of publishing the data - it's something that companies like TV Guide and Tribune end up having to fix up. You won't believe how the TV guide data comes in - sometimes it's a handwritten sheet with the upcoming shows. Maybe it's a printed grid they fax over daily. some of them have it electronically, of course in various formats (spreadsheets, word doc, XML, etc). Oh, and the typos, the typos...

      Couldn't the FCC just force the stations to publish the data in a particular format? Maybe they should make a new standard: ATSC 1.1, which would be ATSC + a TV guide XML data stream.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    46. Re:What are the channels doing? by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

      I fixed that for you:

      [1] Each broadcast or cable channel publishes its schedule and program info to a central database at the FCC.

      [2] The tea party types complain that this is *more* government intrusion.

  3. What do you expect? by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hello...it's Sony. You should be surprised that it worked this long.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    1. Re:What do you expect? by CodeBuster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exactly. It's hard to name another company that treats its customers worse than Sony. Those who buy Sony products have to know that they're going to be screwed sooner or later, it's just part of Sony's corporate DNA to leave their customers holding the bag. They just don't care, so why buy from them? It's like handing your money to the bully and asking for abuse.

    2. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to name another company that treats its customers worse than Sony.

      Plays for Sure, Kin...

    3. Re:What do you expect? by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plays for Sure and Kin were nothing compared to the Sony Rootkit fiasco. That was a much lower low than anything Microsoft ever did; Sony, like no other.

    4. Re:What do you expect? by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And "plays for sure" can't have hurt many customers. For starters those devices never sold well, secondly there can't have been much content sold for it either, with so little uptake on the hardware side.

      That was mostly MS screwing over their business partners. But then, MS business partners are probably used to that already.

    5. Re:What do you expect? by symbolset · · Score: 2

      Sony's motto does seem to be "buy our stuff because it doesn't work with your other stuff." Memory stick, really?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:What do you expect? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      BBBut they have Beelions to spend on marketing...

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    7. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is Apple followers like it.

    8. Re:What do you expect? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Wish there were a +1000 insightful mod.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a Sony under American management. My walkman, discman and minidisc player from ages ago work just fine.

    10. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sony used to be the brand of high quality products. All my old Sony tape players and other hardware still works. It can take awhile for people to lose their impressions of a company, especially if they don't understand why their devices stop working. "Computer tech just does that sometimes"

    11. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, and you can thank Apple for that. The DoJ really should have stepped in and told Apple that they can't have exclusive licenses and DRM that's not supported by other devices.

    12. Re:What do you expect? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      ..they sold hundreds of millions of devices. (hint: certain mobile manufacturers phones included playforsure... which made it more complicated for that manufacturer to give root access to developers - as it would have enabled stripping that drm, never mind that it was easy enough to strip anyhow... that screwed a lot of people actually. and to add insult to injury now that same company made MS their primary partner! GO TEAM!!!)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:What do you expect? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      On release day I dubbed Plays For Sure "Plays For Now". That turned prophetic.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    14. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plays for Sure and Kin were nothing compared to the Sony Rootkit fiasco. That was a much lower low than anything Microsoft ever did; Sony, like no other.

      Hardly a fair comparison. Why would Microsoft write a root-kit when they can just update the kernel?

    15. Re:What do you expect? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      That was my thought. You bought a Sony product and are surprised when they screw you over? I thought that was why people bought Sony, to be screwed over.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    16. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop making up lame ass anti-Microsoft rants in every story, it's getting annoying.

    17. Re:What do you expect? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

      Hey, my Sony remote for the Sony TV I bought failed within 18 months, but Sony said "We don't make that remote anymore!"

      Sony is a Dinosaur; headed for quick extinction.

    18. Re:What do you expect? by ilguido · · Score: 1

      My Sony cd/dvd player dvp-s535d still works and I bought it 12 years ago.

    19. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason not to buy Sony shit.

    20. Re:What do you expect? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Hey, my Sony remote for the Sony TV I bought failed within 18 months, but Sony said "We don't make that remote anymore!"

      My Sony TV remote disappeared one day. eBay was full of identical replacements. Never even occurred to me to try to get the replacement from Sony. (Turned up two years later - One of the kids had hidden it in the heating duct. Still worked.)

    21. Re:What do you expect? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Our 2003 Sony plasma still works great, too. Black isn't quite as sharp as it used to be but that's to be expected. Sony, at least in the past (10+ years ago), made good hardware.

      The problem, though, is that the Sony content divisions drive the company to fuck over the users of their hardware products. It doesn't matter how good the hardware is if the company can fill it with proprietary DRM, or make it dependent upon some sort of network connection that they can later use to remove features (PS3) or turn off a "forever free" feature (DVR guide). And they always, always (afaik) use a proprietary Sony format instead of a standard, so there's no way to hack around the issue.

      Just be happy that your DVD player still works, and keep it away from a phone line or ethernet port so Sony executives can't screw it up.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    22. Re:What do you expect? by spasm · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's funny - you can almost guess the age of someone based on their opinion of Sony. Those of us who were buying electronic gadgets in the '80s still have a memory of Sony as making some of the best quality consumer electronics, and being innovative as well. Those who weren't old enough to be buying consumer electronics until the mid 90s and beyond know Sony only as an insane DRM machine.

    23. Re:What do you expect? by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      "Sony used to be the brand of high quality products. All my old Sony tape players and other hardware still works" They are, especially from a service point of view. Easy to work on, well constructed, well documented. To bad the company sucks balls and I will never purchase anything from them.

    24. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you should be surprised that it didn't stab your Xbox, rape your television, and mail your wallet to corporate headquarters before setting fire to your home. That's what I expect from Sony these days, which is why I pre-emptively put my PS2 fat, the last Sony product I ever bought, in a locked Faraday cage.

    25. Re:What do you expect? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Some of us are far enough into geezerhood that we remember when "made in Japan" pretty much universally meant cheap junk.

      Now if you'll excuse me I need to go yell at a cloud.

      Or some kids on the lawn.

      I always get the two confused.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  4. World can be so mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, practically all hardware you own get's practically useless. I mean, you don't live in socialism, so ditch your cheap crappy hardware and go looking for alternative.

    1. Re:World can be so mean... by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      You are confusing capitalism with the novel "Brave New World".

      There's simply no good reason to be wasteful. It's economically ineffcient and negatively impacts the environment as well as one's ability to be self-sufficient and plan ahead.

      In any market that resembles the ideal models of capitalism, Sony should have been run out of town on a rail.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:World can be so mean... by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      There's simply no good reason to be wasteful. It's economically ineffcient and negatively impacts the environment as well as one's ability to be self-sufficient and plan ahead.

      Yes, but that 6 month old cell phone isn't as shiny. Never underestimate the power of marketing on the weak-minded. It doesn't have #INSERT_FEATURE_01, therefore it's pure crap and needs to be replaced. It doesn't matter that you would never use that feature, or that it has 6 other features that do the same thing, it doesn't have that one feature, and you need that one feature, so you need to spend money to replace it.

      That, unfortunately, is the ideal model of capitalism: it's not about making a good product, it's about making money. If you can make a better margin selling a shitty product, then that's what you will do. Sony is just doing what everybody else is doing. A handful of consumers will luck out and make smart buys, but most won't, or won't realize they've made a smart buy and replace a good piece of kit with something that's worse. *Some* brands will maintain their integrity, and their sub-1% market share, but most consumers simply don't know enough about what they're buying to care.

      In the realm of AV equipment, Sony hasn't made a good product in 20 years. Possibly longer. But when people are convinced that a $1500 home theatre is "high end", because that's the most expensive they see at Best Buy, there's no point in explaining that a *real* high end system will cost more than a luxury car.

  5. rms is right by MadTinfoilHatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why proprietary software is a bad thing and we should avoid products like this.

    1. Re:rms is right by schitso · · Score: 2

      Now try to get the common consumer to understand that.

    2. Re:rms is right by kimvette · · Score: 1

      More importantly, try to get the common consumer to care.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:rms is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One shouldn't care about the common consumer, until they care about themselves.
      Then, it will be a self-fixing issue.

    4. Re:rms is right by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In particular, this situation indicates why tivoized systems are a bad thing and why the GPLv3 was necessary. Not that this system had GPL'd software in it necessarily, but if it had, it would have needed the updated, v3 license to allow customers to run their own mods to make the hardware work for them.

      Oh, wait. Are the Sony HDD 250 and 500 DVR systems digital signature-locked to prevent modified software from operating?

    5. Re:rms is right by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Well, this should certainly help. When someone asks you "Why doesn't my Sony work any more?" The answer is "Cos it used closed source software?" Then you can explain it. If they are too thick to understand, then the answer is "That is what Sony is like"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    6. Re:rms is right by theNetImp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Proprietary software isn't the problem here, proprietary APIs are. If there was an open API that could be switched too this wouldn't be an issue.

    7. Re:rms is right by symbolset · · Score: 2

      This is about messaging, and the message has to be simple: "Sony stuff doesn't work with your other stuff because they want to sell you more Sony stuff." And if you want to, you can replace the word "Sony" there with the word "Microsoft". This is a strategy that used to work, and they both still use it, and it doesn't work any more.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:rms is right by zugedneb · · Score: 0

      Used to do that. The last time was when a Windows Vista update reset a lot of the installed additional drivers for my mum. I took the chance of explaining a little bit of the culture around software and whatnot...
      Guys, it is the last time I explained anything for anyone.

      I could see such a deep hatred glowing in her eyes, that it gave me an out of body experience almost... And that hatred was towards the pathetic minion (me) sitting and struggling to fix her pc, while giving crappy excuses.

      No more PC support ever for me.

    9. Re:rms is right by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      I own one of the HDD 250's. It's been great, but there is no way (that we know of) to change the firmware without Sony's keys. We can't even add drives to it.
      I guess it is time to build a Myth TV box.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
    10. Re:rms is right by fatphil · · Score: 1

      > tivoized systems are a bad thing

      Exactly. I find myself someties sticking out as being one of the most pro-GPLv3 people I know (I hang around with a lot of open source software contributors), and it's when situations like this occur that I can point to the flag I'm standing under, and say "This is why I am here - I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so".

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    11. Re:rms is right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work. To them, it's just you searching for excuses because you're too dumb to fix it.

      After all, you're just you, but Sony, that's a big company where a lot of very smart people made that piece of crap you're now struggling to get to work. People still think that products are made with the intention to serve them, not their maker.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:rms is right by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      it's when situations like this occur that I can point to the flag I'm standing under, and say "This is why I am here - I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so".

      Of course that's a lie. If you really hated saying "I told you so" you'd not do so. You'd simply stop after "This is why I am here".

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:rms is right by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      There was an article on Techdirt like this with senior people from the content industries doing the complaining about things like the magical button they want at Google.com that will allow them to stop piracy. This kind of stupidity isn't just restricted to people's n00b friends and relatives. Captains of industry that should be smarter than that also buy into that kind of nonsense.

      All around there are plenty of people that don't understand that there's a limit to what tech can do or what companies are willing or able to do.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re:rms is right by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This is the classic "I can't fix my own printer" problem that inspired RMS to propagate Free Software.

      Of course the problem is proprietary softare and systems that cannot be serviced by the end user.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    15. Re:rms is right by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Not if I hate leaving people in a state of ignorance or indecision even more.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    16. Re:rms is right by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I think the recent Apple "Now you all need to switch to our new proprietary connector that people aren't allowed to make cheap versions of" nastiness has taught that lesson to a few people. Also, didn't Sony introduce another proprietary memory stick for their latest mobile gaming gadget? They just don't learn.

    17. Re:rms is right by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      This is why proprietary software is a bad thing and we should avoid products like this.

      Ah, no worries. They're about to release a model that's 10x+ more expensive that will have another provider's data stream in it. With a different UI! Buy, buy buy.

      Signed, Humorously Jaded Comsumer.

    18. Re:rms is right by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      I believe you meant Apple when you said Microsoft.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    19. Re:rms is right by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it is the people that don't learn - not Apple. Shady business tactics like that work great for Apple as they increase revenue. And the consumers say things like "this is how Apple ensures quality".

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    20. Re:rms is right by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      People also used to make statements like that about Sony ... so people may eventually learn, although you still hear people defending them.

    21. Re:rms is right by EGSonikku · · Score: 2

      To be fair, this was Apples first cable switch in 12 years (since the original iPods). Yeah, proprietary = bad BUT at least you know it's going to be the Apple standard for probably a decade or more, unlike Sony throwing out some new type of memory stick EVERY TIME THEY MAKE A NEW GADGET.

      --
      - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    22. Re:rms is right by Fnord666 · · Score: 2

      Captains of industry that should be smarter than that also buy into that kind of nonsense.

      These are the same captains of industry that have their administrative assistants print out their emails so that they can read them and hand write a reply. The admin then dutifully types the reply email from the notes. It's going to get worse before it gets better.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    23. Re:rms is right by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      If you really told them so, they will remember it already after you said "This is why I'm here." Explicitly saying so will decrease the probability of taking your advice. Nobody likes to be told "I told you so" even if it is true. It will only get them into an opposition, and less accepting of what you say. Instead of adding insult to injury, you could instead be helpful by pointing to GPLed alternatives.

      Of course if you didn't tell them so, "I told you so" itself is a lie.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    24. Re:rms is right by fatphil · · Score: 1

      > Instead of adding insult to injury,

      Ha - do you really classify "I hate to say I told you so" as an insult? You must have a pathetically thin skin if that's the case.

      > you could instead be helpful by pointing to GPLed alternatives.

      What makes you think that I don't do that? Stop attempting to make a straw man from your false assumptions.

      > Of course if you didn't tell them so, "I told you so" itself is a lie.

      Nice insinuation that I'm a liar. However, I do tell them, so your assuptions are again false.

      And to be honest, in my experience, the more insulting the *repeated* feedback, the more likely it is to be effective. Soft fluffy "I mentioned {thing} before, have you tried it yet?" never works. "Again? You fucking idiot." often does.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    25. Re:rms is right by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Them too.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    26. Re:rms is right by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      > Instead of adding insult to injury,

      Ha - do you really classify "I hate to say I told you so" as an insult?

      "I told you so" is the insult.

      > you could instead be helpful by pointing to GPLed alternatives.
      What makes you think that I don't do that?

      What part of instead did you not understand?

      > Of course if you didn't tell them so, "I told you so" itself is a lie.

      Nice insinuation that I'm a liar. However, I do tell them, so your assuptions are again false.

      Elementary logic fail. Here's a hint: The sentence starts with an "if".
      Here's another hint: The first paragraph also started with an "if", but with the opposite condition. Together they cover all possible cases.

      And to be honest, in my experience, the more insulting the *repeated* feedback, the more likely it is to be effective. Soft fluffy "I mentioned {thing} before, have you tried it yet?" never works. "Again? You fucking idiot." often does.

      Well, if you did the insulting feedback to me, it would certainly be effective -- in making me avoid every and any contact to you as much as possible.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    27. Re:rms is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a strange twist of fate, you are posting on a proprietary website.

    28. Re:rms is right by unitron · · Score: 1

      Ironically (is that the word I want here?), the TiVo is more "hackable" in some ways than the other stuff for the most part, and people wind up learning stuff about hard drives and routers that they otherwise wouldn't and some who otherwise wouldn't be are even exposed to the Linux command line.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    29. Re:rms is right by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Good. Fuck off then. You clearly do not have enough intelligence to understand the simple word "insinuation", for example, so I can't expect to see much in the way of intelligent debate from you.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    30. Re:rms is right by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the standard is fucking Micro-USB and there's no goddamn reason why Apple couldn't have picked it instead!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  6. sell sell sell by issicus · · Score: 1

    probably better off anyway, don't you know TV rots your brain?

    1. Re:sell sell sell by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      That depends on what you watch. And, of course, how much.

      Indeed, I've noticed that a DVR makes me watch less: I first record the show. Now, I am at a point where I can watch it any time I want, so it's not a priority "I'll have to see it now, or I'll miss it". Which means I might end up not watching it at all before I much later delete it to make space for something else, on the account that if I haven't watched it till then, I'll probably not watch it later either.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:sell sell sell by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      A good DVR makes TV watchable.

      It can find things for you and present them to you under your own terms.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:sell sell sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I have something called a VCR and these things called VHS tapes. They work fine, they don't need Internet connectivity.

    4. Re:sell sell sell by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Funny, I don't need internet connectivity either, and yet I'm not restricted to tapes, but can record and play directly to/from hard disk. And with better quality than VHS, too.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:sell sell sell by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      "video recorders [watch] tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself"

      Douglas Adams. Right again.

    6. Re:sell sell sell by issicus · · Score: 1

      "so, what do you wanna watch?" , "I don't know, whatever is on"

    7. Re:sell sell sell by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      "so, what do you wanna watch?" , "I don't know, whatever is on"

      I usually decide what to watch before I even switch on my TV. Yes, this may include looking on the internet, but then I do so with my computer. Which of course has internet connection (otherwise I couldn't post here).

      But most of the time, I just look into the old-fashioned paper TV guide.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:sell sell sell by issicus · · Score: 1

      I think it's kind of funny how many replies i got to this. it's really simple. you do not need to watch a screen, ever.

    9. Re:sell sell sell by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      If I only ever did what I need to do, my life would be very poor indeed.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  7. Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by detritus. · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There should be a mandate that if you want to be a dick and no longer choose to support the software of an obsolete product you sold to maintain core functionality, you should forfeit the source code. At the very least, make it legal to reverse engineer and distribute fixes/functionality without fear of retribution. This is going to become much more common in the future unless someone does something.

    1. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes - I agree, if you don't support it at least make the source code available.

      I recently upgraded from CentOS5 to CentOS6. I have a 4 year old Brother printer/scanner, the RPMs for the drivers would not install (wrong [old] version of glibc & similar). Brother tech support tried to be helpful, but no - it was no longer sold and they would not create new RPMs. With a bit of fiddling I was able to get it to work - but a naive user would not have [I am not being rude about some people].

      I will never buy a Brother product again - 4 years is not that old for a bit of hardware; if they don't maintain their drivers I will not take the risk of being left with working but unusable hardware; neither will I support a company that leaves its customers in the lurch.

    2. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, our copyright law makes reverse engineering "for the intention to create or maintain interoperability" legal. If yours doesn't, it's time to give your politicians a kick in the rear.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by firex726 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, often times the code used has code from other third parties.
      So just because Sony may be cool with it, all the other companies who contributed code may not be.

    4. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Requiring Sony to publish the source is probably not an option as there are likely many different copyright holders, each owning part of the code, and some of them may have nothing to do with the product as such: e.g. Sony bought a license to their software. Gonna be a legal mess.

    5. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, 4 years isn't all that bad these days. Lacie has dropped support for 1 year old drives, G-Drives (now Hitachi) dropped support for their expensive externals after 2 years.

      Their answer? We'll give you a 10% discount on some new stuff from us.

      Rinse, lather, repeat.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      At the very least, make it legal to reverse engineer and distribute fixes/functionality without fear of retribution.

      Land of the Free, Home of the Brave. Not land of the free and whimpy.

      Be free, don't beg for it.

      BTW, they should sell the domains to SchedulesDirect for $1 to at least make a passing attempt at not hating their customers.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I so agree. Having a DHG-HDD250 myself, I'd love to hack it to put MythTV on it. Unfortunately, being a CableCard unit, this thing is locked-up tight. There isn't even a service manual for it for fear of someone reversing it. There's details about the innards @ http://www.avsforum.com/t/1225369/just-whats-inside-a-sony-dhg-hddxx0

    8. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by f16c · · Score: 1

      Yep. This is also why I'll never buy another Seagate drive. Designed to fail by the warranty expiration. Use to be both faster and longer lasting than the competition. Now just junk. Last build lasted 6 years. Now the hardware is lucky to make it 3 without losing function. I have a stack of mainboards, DVD Drives, sound cards (to fix broken sound function) and Ethernet cards. I may plug as much into the USBs as I can get away with soon so I won't have to open the case any more to fix stuff just to keep my work...

      I also have a VCR from the late '90s made by Sony and a Hi-8 camera from 2003 that both work fine. Nice hardware. Too bad they forgot how to build stuff to last... Or that people even want any more.

      --
      bob@Osprey:~>
    9. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      There should be a mandate that if you want to be a dick and no longer choose to support the software of an obsolete product you sold to maintain core functionality, you should forfeit the source code. At the very least, make it legal to reverse engineer and distribute fixes/functionality without fear of retribution. This is going to become much more common in the future unless someone does something.

      Isn't there something in Europe where if a device doesn't provide (or no longer provides) functionality that it was advertised with, they need to offer you a full refund? Wasn't that the deal with the PS3s after they stopped being able to run Linux?

      I'm not naive enough to wonder why we don't have consumer protections like that in the US, but I do wonder why we still sit for it.

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    10. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, no mandate or law needed. Their fault as a developer for using someone else's libraries and functionality instead of rolling your own and following a standard. Their fault as a consumer for buying and using a product where the developer relied on someone else's libraries and functionality.

    11. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Zadaz · · Score: 2

      Great idea... but that's just not going to work either.

      Very few projects can simply open up their code without getting into all kinds of legal trouble. Third party libraries, distribution agreements, confidentiality agreements, licenses, employment contracts, etc ad infinitum. Some of this can be negotiated around, some can't. None of it can happen without people willing to put in the time and energy (and money) to do it.*

      And I don't believe the government should be intervening in business to place them in a Catch-22. (The Catch-22 here is being forced to either support a money-losing product or pay to provide a public version.) This would have a deeply chilling effect on business and innovation. Who would go into a business they knew they could never get out of no matter how bad it got? Answer: Assholes looking for a government bailout.

      The correct solution is that the market (ie: you and I) should punish the companies that favor lock-in and don't make fault-tolerant equipment, and reward those who don't create dead-end products.

      *Source: Having been on the inside of companies that try to take private software open source.

    12. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      But if you didn't change your OS, their drivers that they still supply would work fine, yes? Sounds like you should be asking the makers of CentOS to stop dropping support for old drivers.

      Perhaps if you gave them a time machine then 4 years ago in 2008 they could have developed and tested new drivers for an OS that was released in 2011.

      Do their drivers still work on CentOS 5.8?

    13. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      But as Opportunist said, their country's copyright laws make that particular use of copyright material legal, why does it matter which rights holder is involved?

    14. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Tell that to DVD-Jon

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    15. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      The problem is the dependancies in the RPM - not hard for them to fix. I also needed to put some stuff into udev rules. They seem to provide newer RPMs for new printers, they just have not bothered to maintain them for older ones -- it would not be hard to do.

      This has nothing to do with bad/wrong actions by the CentOS guys (CentOS is a recompile of RedHat) - the real issue is Brother not supplying source to their drivers, maybe related to the secret yellow dots.

    16. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to trend off topic, but I have a 4-year old Brother that works fine and has decent postscript support in Linux. Yet, when I bought it, it had native dual-stack functionality out of the box. Guess what happens in another 10 years when IPv6 really starts to speed adoption and these printers don't support that?

    17. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money. If I were a software development company and wanted to make a custom ROM for a widely used product that utilizes any code or API shipped with the original system that is proprietary, would anyone be protected from patent infringement or copyright and be able to make a profit? Doubtful.
      There simply isn't a big enough of a home brew community to devote themselves to every possible market of people dependent on electronics to warrant on a free and open model, especially niche markets or specialized fields.

    18. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      I used to have my printer connected via USB - that no longer works. With some fiddling I was able to print to it via my LAN. I still need a USB connection for the scanner function - so I have 2 different connections for the 2 different things that I do with it.

      I accept that in X years time when I buy a PC that does not support ''achaic USB" that I won't be able to use the scanner part - but that is a different issue.

    19. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by detritus. · · Score: 1

      I agree with your assessment, but we should make every effort to mitigate these sad disasters. While there is little incentive to extend the "lifecycle" of old products, we're throwing far too much away for no acceptable reason. It's certainly not helping the environment or the making the landfills fill at any lesser rate.

    20. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 3 year old Radeon HD4770 and they dropped support for them in the proprietary drivers as of 12.6/12.8 (Linux/Windows).

      The irony of this: The Radeon HD3000/3100/4250 (Maybe a few others) R600 cored IGPs are *STILL BEING SOLD ON STORE SHELVES!*.

      In fact they're the last available IGP for AM2/2+/3/3+ chipsets, as all new models are either split into FM1/2 lower end systems following intel's example with the 1156/1155 processors, or the LGA 1366/2011 without IGP.

      Point being: Currently sold hardware and you can't support both it and newer display devices in the same system (there's no provisions for running hardware under old and new drivers simultaneously.)

    21. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ThinkPenguin.com is doing everything they can to ensure users aren't screwed by such things. They only sell HP printers for instance and only those which have sources available for everything. This is because HP clearly documents the various components that are free or non-free. It's not easy to understand the documentation unless you are fairly technical and read around the wording although it is there.

      Unfortunately few people understand what they are gaining by refusing to use non-free software and when companies like System76 and ZaReason advertise "freedom" and then ship hardware dependent on non-free software... well... it gets even more confusing.

      For those who don't know ThinkPenguin is the only company which is heavily focused on removing the non-free dependencies. Nothing this company sells is dependent on non-free software. They aren't hypocrites advertising freedom and selling hardware dependent on non-free drivers/firmware/etc.

      Unfortunately they get a bad rap for doing it from people too stupid to understand the benefits of using slightly older higher end chipsets than the “latest and greatest”.

    22. Re:Wake up, Federal Trade Commission by Rufty · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I had a similar experience with an HP printer. So who can we buy printers from???

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
  8. When was the last time you saw something of value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on TV?

  9. COTS versus embedded by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is why you buy COTS hardware instead of embedded solutions, guys. You can always upgrade the software on your own if you have to, but if you can't get to the firmware, then there's no telling if there's some dependancy or requirement to an outside source that you've overlooked. People have been building their own PVRs for years now, and many open source solutions like XMBC have matured to the point where they offer multiple service providers on a wide variety of cheap hardware.

    And here's another reason people pirate: I know that I'll always have my video files on my harddrive. They're in a video container format that's been industry standard for years. There are no commercials, no external dependancies, and will play on almost any computer. I can't get that with Netflix -- once, I was halfway through watching a series on 'instant play' when they yanked the entire series. It's no longer available because of some obscure licensing issue that I wasn't informed of until after it was gone. When you rely on "legal" solutions, you're conceding that they have the right and ability to terminate your access at any time. That's also why I don't watch cable TV: It's encrypted and I can't record it. I can't go back and watch it again, and it may never be available again. With pirated content, I know exactly when it'll be available once I have it: Forever.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:COTS versus embedded by Kjella · · Score: 1

      That's also why I don't watch cable TV: It's encrypted and I can't record it. I can't go back and watch it again, and it may never be available again. With pirated content, I know exactly when it'll be available once I have it: Forever.

      I'm not against the idea of subscriptions as opposed to sales, like for example if I pay for a month's access on Spotify or Netflix or WoW and I stop my subscription it's gone and that's fair. It's only pretending to sell me something on a permanent basis that is yanked or made useless because you kill the mothership that pisses me off. There's a reason we have sales, the full and permanent passing of property. Today the trend is more and more that we "sell" you things, but with all sorts of strings attached we can yank at any moment. That sucks.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:COTS versus embedded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But COTS doesn't solve the main problem. Sure, you get a different user interface but that's hardly the biggest problem.

      The main problem is that I can't record anything in better quality than shitty 480i from an analog source, unless I buy the cable or satellite companies' DVRs. There's no ClearQAM, there's no CableCard, satellite DVB-S streams are encrypted as well (Nagravision), and there's hardly any ATSC (OTA) feeds. Even analog cable is now an option I have to pay extra for, and that will be phased out soon.

      So my only option is to rent or buy an overpriced yet shitty DVR from the local cable company. And then when they move stuff it still records the wrong show, I can't copy/archive/reencode shows, the ads are still there, etc.

      Or yes, I can just setup a torrent client to use a RSS feed and to download my shows in HD-quality (with less effort than it takes to schedule it on a DVR), with the ads removed, ready to archive on my NAS, in a format that can be played by basically everything (PC, Tablet, etc), anytime, anywhere, in any way I please. This is also the only option that's free and it's by far the most convenient too. Why would anyone want to pay a lot of money to have less freedom, more lock in, DRM, poor hardware, having ads and so on? Sure, it's not exactly legal, but that's what they're still competing with.

    3. Re:COTS versus embedded by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      It's only pretending to sell me something on a permanent basis that is yanked or made useless because you kill the mothership that pisses me off. There's a reason we have sales, the full and permanent passing of property. Today the trend is more and more that we "sell" you things, but with all sorts of strings attached we can yank at any moment. That sucks.

      Which is different than a car in what way? They can stop making replacement parts for your particular make/model any time they wish and it that part breaks, you are SOL unless you can find a working one in a junkyard.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    4. Re:COTS versus embedded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With pirated content, an FBI raid on your home is just one knock away. Are you sure someone didn't forward your post mentioning piracy to the FBI?

    5. Re:COTS versus embedded by girlintraining · · Score: 0

      Which is different than a car in what way? They can stop making replacement parts for your particular make/model any time they wish and it that part breaks, you are SOL unless you can find a working one in a junkyard.

      You're sitting there with the part in your hand. Believe it or not, that's all you need. Take it to a machine shop and they can make another.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:COTS versus embedded by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The engine ECU broke, a machine shop can't make me another one. Without the correct software it won't communicate correctly with the transmission ECU.

    7. Re:COTS versus embedded by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      There's no statutory damages in my country. No FBI either. They only go after Kim DotCom sized "pirates" with illegally obtained warrants in the hope of extradition.

  10. You're in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cant you just sue them?

    1. Re:You're in America by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 2

      Sure, and after 5-10 years of legal battles, your DVR just might work again!

    2. Re:You're in America by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Sure, and after 5-10 years of legal battles, your DVR just might work again!

      In 5-10 years, The rule of Accelerating Change states that there will be nothing that DVR can inter-operate with, which makes your comment +2 Funny. :-)

    3. Re:You're in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... more like after 5-10 years, the class-action will be successful, the lawyers will get millions and you'll get a $100 voucher on a new Sony DVR.

    4. Re:You're in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a far more worthy class action suit here, than that idiot suing Blizzard for $6.50.

  11. How is this not your fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whenever you buy a hardware device that relies on online services to perform vital functions YOU must take into consideration what will happen when those services dissapear. It's childish to assume a company will just provide this kind of services to old customers from whom it collects no payments anymore or towards whom it made no written promises.

    1. Re:How is this not your fault? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Was it advertised that the device relies on the external service (as opposed to just using it, but still being usable, albeit in a less convenient way, without it?)

      I personally would never expect the basic functionality of a DVR (that is, recording TV signals from programmed channels at programmed times) to fail just because a service providing information about TV broadcasts is shut down. I'd expect to just have to enter the times by hand in that case, not to have a completely useless device.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:How is this not your fault? by RailRide · · Score: 1

      I'd expect to just have to enter the times by hand in that case, not to have a completely useless device.

      The Archos TVPlus DVRs were like this. While they defaulted to a (now defunct) subscription TV listings service, you were always just one keypress from a standard "set it yourself" date/channel/time-on/time-off/quality menu. I never actually used the subscription service because of this.

      Also, these boxes recorded standard MP4 AVI files with PCM audio that you could easily offload through the USB port (possibly over Ethernet/wifi too). Pity they never made a set-top HD version.*

      (then again, the above may explain why they didn't...hmm)

      ---PCJ

      *(their "Internet Tablet" series PMPs could behave like a PVR and record 720P (if I recall correctly) when docked in an extra-cost "DVR station", but no set-top version existed)

    3. Re:How is this not your fault? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Whenever you buy a hardware device that relies on online services to perform vital functions YOU must take into consideration what will happen when those services dissapear. It's childish to assume a company will just provide this kind of services to old customers from whom it collects no payments anymore or towards whom it made no written promises.

      Non-thinkers (the masses, at least in the US) are people who are in a "want" phase, and don't think of the future and the repercussions of their decisions.

      That gives me an idea... Build up a huge company selling some "best device ever" piece of crap right before the holidays (hell, add unlimited support), offshore the money, launder it....... *silence*
       
      :-)

  12. lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Osgeld · · Score: 0

    its the lifetime of the product, you buy something and its taken off the market an hour later ... u be fucked

    ps Santa Clause is not real either, please get a clue

    1. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      its the lifetime of the product

      So a lifetime warranty means it's warranted until it breaks down?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ps Santa Clause is not real either, please get a clue

      What?! Don't believe in Santa, huh? I know someone who's getting a lump of coal in their Xmas stocking this year! (Which nowadays with the price of eting your home is a pretty good gift!)

    3. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by xlsior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So a lifetime warranty means it's warranted until it breaks down?

      Pretty much, yes.

      "Lifetime product warranties" typically cover the 'reasonably expected' lifetime of the product the product in question, not your lifetime.

      If anything, 'lifetime warranty' can be a much worse deal than a predefined number of years, since it's so vague. It's often used in sales since it sounds like a great deal to the uninformed buyer, but in reality it's pretty much the ultimate weasel-word.

    4. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      no, it means its warrantied until they stop making it, and its impossible for them to replace it.

      most consumer electronics companies are required to keep parts 3 years.

      When I had to deal with it, we had a few irate calls a month cause someone bought a digital piano in 1989 and could not get replacement parts in 2009 when it shat on itself.

    5. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      When I had to deal with it, we had a few irate calls a month cause someone bought a digital piano in 1989 and could not get replacement parts in 2009 when it shat on itself.

      If it had a lifetime warranty, they were justified in being irate. That's a misleading term if you don't mean it to be for the life of the company or company's name (whichever is longer) which is what it should mean legally.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by acid_andy · · Score: 1

      ps Santa Clause is not real either, please get a clue

      What?! Don't believe in Santa, huh? I know someone who's getting a lump of coal in their Xmas stocking this year! (Which nowadays with the price of eting your home is a pretty good gift!)

      It's a legal term. The Santa Clause permits Santa Claus to legally enter people's houses uninvited.

      Google tells me it was also a Tim Allen film.

      --
      Your ad here.
    7. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by sjames · · Score: 1

      Legally, abny vague term such as 'lifetime' is SUPPOSED to be interpreted in favor of the consumer. If the company means "until we say it's not" or 'three years', they better say that.

      Of course, the courts have been corporate friendly for a long time.

    8. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the price of eting your home

      I'd ask Santa for a dictionary if I were you.

    9. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Clearly, the term "lifetime" should be abandoned. As you say, it's too vague to be of use, and frankly, I ignore that, it's not a selling point for that reason. Along similar lines, in practice, I generally find that a lifetime warranty to be of less value than a warranty of specifically defined duration.

      Under no circumstances is it realistic to assign a lifetime warranty of an electronic device to the life of the owner. It's clearly a hyperbolic stretch, but I'd almost be concerned that it would give a perverse incentive to rig the device to kill the owner in the case of failure.

    10. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the price of eting your home

      I'd ask Santa for a dictionary if I were you.

      It was typed in "heating", it was correct in the preview pane also, don't know what caused it. I used a cheap chinese tablet, and the keyboard input sure gets screwy sometimes, I notice. :-(

    11. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advertising lifetime warranties is illegal in Germany because it is an unrealizable promise and therefor a unfair business practice. The highest allowed duration is 30 years and I have only seen it for bathtubs.

    12. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You used a cheap Chinese tablet? No wonder you didn't get your spelling right! :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, the term "lifetime" should be abandoned.

      Not abandoned, enforced.
      It is pretty clear that the companies that use the term "lifetime warranty" intends for the customer to interpret it as virtually forever. If it was enforced that way then the companies that would like to provide that kind of service (A few clock makers and perhaps one or two knife brands come to mind.) can still use that term.
      Companies that just want to seem a bit more service minded than they really are would have to stop being weasels or face the consequences.

    14. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Under no circumstances is it realistic to assign a lifetime warranty of an electronic device to the life of the owner.

      Why not? There's no reason electronics can't be made to last, they just aren't.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      no it didnt, but it illustrates the point, where the fuck are you going to get electronics that ceased to be in production 20 + years ago?

    16. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      wow, what fantasy land do you live in?

    17. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      no it didnt

      No it didnt[sic] what?

      where the fuck are you going to get electronics that ceased to be in production 20 + years ago?

      IMO the legal standard should be that if you stop providing repairs, you have to provide blueprints and specifications. You clearly no longer have a commercial interest, so you should make it possible for the customer to seek repairs for the product. Mind you, I believe this only in the case of a "lifetime warranty" which implies to the customer that they will receive service for their entire life. That's what it means when I buy a Craftsman or Snap-On or Mac or Matco or many other brands of hand tool. If I find both halves of a Craftsman ratchet that broke in 1973 and bring it in to my local Sears store, they will replace it.

      The simple answer is, don't offer a lifetime warranty if you can't honor it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      no it didnt

      No it didnt[sic] what?

      really? are you really incapable of tying my post to your post without acting like a third party who just walked in?

    19. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The one where I have a basement full of 30 year old electronics in working order.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The simple answer is, don't offer a lifetime warranty if you can't honor it.

      But if the current CEO or product manager or marking manager or whoever doesn't plan on being in the company more than 5 years, what's their incentive? "I can offer a life time warranty because I won't be around to honor it"

    21. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      are you really incapable of tying my post to your post without acting like a third party who just walked in?

      No, I'm just not willing to waste that much time trying to figure out what someone so incoherent is on about. Why don't you use the quote feature so that I don't have to try to do conversational forensics to figure out what you're trying to say?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      if the current CEO or product manager or marking manager or whoever doesn't plan on being in the company more than 5 years, what's their incentive?

      As usual, I gotta say, "there oughta be a law". Not a whole law, though. It should have been part of warranty law long since.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      sorry you are so incompetent to read one post above, and since you cant be bothered to keep up with this conversation, I think we are done

      good day

    24. Re:lifetime doesnt mean your lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I briefly sold vacuum cleaners with an owner's lifetime warranty. Some companies use it in their sales pitch.

  13. Manual programming by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    Can't dvrs be progrmmed manually, like video cassette recorder owners used to do? Sure, the convienence is gone, but recordings can still be made, can't they?. Buying "Lifetime service" does you no good when companies seem to be able to change it's service at any time. Sometimes, companies lie, and misrepresent their products to get us to buy them. Color me shocked!

  14. Yes, but options? by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 1

    Why don't the channels just broadcast the programme data alongside the actual programming?

    Well, that's a legitimate question. You could also ask why the hardware doesn't support alternative operating systems. Either way, you're asking either one (or several) large television network(s) to suddenly make a change to the way things are broadcast, or you're asking a large (multinational) company to provide open access to their closed system.

    I hope the programming community comes up with an alternative - or modified - firmware. Unfortunately, unlike the android/xda/cyanogenmod community, DVR software isn't easily available, accessible or standardized across players. Maybe it is as simple as making a DVD drive region free - but even then, does the average consumer have access to the (relatively cheap) tools to flip a few 0s and 1s and "update" the hardware? And the likelyhood of it being that simple is pretty low...

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    1. Re:Yes, but options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why don't the channels just broadcast the programme data alongside the actual programming?

      Well, that's a legitimate question. ... Either way, you're asking either one (or several) large television network(s) to suddenly make a change to the way things are broadcast, or you're asking a large (multinational) company to provide open access to their closed system.

      Let PBS broadcast the clock signal. Have the large networks throw some cash at PBS to provide the service. It could help shorten their annoying fundraising weeks and may prevent Congress from trying to eliminate them from the budget.

  15. Bashing onwards by Mathness · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is this meant to be another bash SONY because they are "evil" "article"?

    Before you head down that line, note that:

    - Rovi (corporation) used to be called Macrovision.
    - This is for a (free?) Over The Air service.
    - No link to the Rovi announcement or their reasoning.
    - Affects any device and service relying on Rovi and their data.

    It seems to me this is just another move to get people onto cable where media companies can exert more control over content (and the people watching) and rake in more money.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
    1. Re:Bashing onwards by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Affects any device and service relying on Rovi and their data.

      And here's the problem: A device which relies on (instead of just uses, as an option) a specific third party service without need. Would the same device allow to directly enter the data as an option, Rovi stopping the service would be a mere annoyance instead of making the devices useless.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Bashing onwards by bfandreas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rovi (corporation) used to be called Macrovision.

      That snippet alone would have explained about eveything. Why was this omitted in the submission? So basically Sony built a system that relied completely on a service provided by Macrovision and the customers got completely screwed over?

      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    3. Re:Bashing onwards by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "And here's the problem: A device which relies on (instead of just uses, as an option) a specific third party service without need."

      And here's the solution: So sue the fuck out of the for violating the anti-tying provisions of the Magnusson-Moss Warranty act.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Bashing onwards by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      It's misleading.

      Macrovision acquired TV Guide On Screen, who had acquired Videoguide. Videoguide was the company behind the VCR+ codes that used remote controls to "program" devices to record.

      For the older devices, Sony was most likely dealing with TVGOS, which had every intent to maintain the guide listing service. TVGOS faltered when cable companies started removing their analog channels because they didn't have a digital version ready in time. The guide data was carried over analog exclusively at that time. That's when Macrovision came in, most likely for the patents. I very much doubt that Sony could have seen that coming, because the TVGOS folks sure didn't.

    5. Re:Bashing onwards by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I didn't realise Sony owned Rovi or had an agreement with them to guarantee service to their customers, after all they sold a product that is completely reliant on the service Rovi provides.

    6. Re:Bashing onwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really relevant. They, Rovi, were providing a free service and decided to stop providing it. They, Rovi, have in no way ripped off anyone in this matter.

      Sony, OTOH, built a product that required a free service, on an on-going basis, that was provided by a third party. That was a design decision just guaranteed to result in tears.

      Rovi deserves no bashing. Sony does.

  16. Surprised for other reasons. by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hello...it's Sony. You should be surprised that it worked this long.

    Sometimes it's a good thing when Sony products die. It means they stop spying on you.

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
  17. It's in the fine print by Turminder+Xuss · · Score: 1

    Under the terms of the lifetime service agreement all TiVo Guide OnScreen users must now report for termination.

    --
    You seem to regard science as some kind of dodge... or hustle.
    1. Re:It's in the fine print by unitron · · Score: 1

      But so far, only in the UK.

      Unless they get one of those new Virgin Media TiVos.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  18. It came out in 2004. What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry. While I own multiple Tivo's I can't feel sorry for you, as the DVR's were released in 2004, by digital recording standards, that's old and outdated. I'm actually surprised they still work. Good that they lasted this long. You should check out the new Premiere's. Yeah, it's a monthly fee, but I find it well worth it, and it allows me access to the Xfinity app, that i have only been able to use on my iPad until recently.

    1. Re:It came out in 2004. What did you expect? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I have a couple VCRs from the '90s that still work fine, why shouldn't a DVR last at LEAST 10 years (possably w/ a HD replacement)? Apparently Sony=expensive junk.

      Considering that a firmware upgrade would at least allow the things to retain useful functionality, it seems like Sony really does owe it to their customers.

    2. Re:It came out in 2004. What did you expect? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      Complete bullshit. Just because you expect to have to buy something new every few years does not mean that I do. I do not see 8 years as very old. I understand that manufacturers want you to buy something new to maintain their income stream - but I don't feel obliged to contribute.

  19. Not this one. by robbak · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I read, Sony decided to save pennies by not having a rtc, and relying on the ota signals. So no ota clock signals, no clock, no work.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    1. Re:Not this one. by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      From what I read, Sony decided to save pennies by not having a rtc, and relying on the ota signals. So no ota clock signals, no clock, no work.

      Nice. So then, in this case, the guy now owns a shiny electric paperweight.

    2. Re:Not this one. by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      Actually it has an RTC, just no way to "set" it manually.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
  20. Normal End of Life cycle by dokebi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, Sony discontinued this product 7 years ago. I'm sure you've gotten your money's worth out of it.

    Think about it this way: If it died of hardware failure instead, would you be so upset? Likely not.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    1. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would and am upset when I cannot get a piece of hardware fixed.

    2. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One could say the same thing about your life, Dude.

    3. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a VCR that's over 20 years old that still works fine. Weird thing is, it's a Sony.

    4. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is it didn't suffer a hardware failure. This is like if your car suddenly stopped working because Ford wants to sell you a new one. Yes the engine could've died, but it didn't, it would still work just as well as yesterday if they didn't put the equivalent of a time bomb in the software.

      Were the customers aware of this time bomb on the moment of purchase? And I don't mean hiding it in legaleze, was it written in the box that the device would stop working in 2012?

    5. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Dude, Sony discontinued this product 7 years ago. I'm sure you've gotten your money's worth out of it."

      They told us before: "It's not a trick, it's a Sony! "

    6. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by ByteSlicer · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Mayans even predicted this long time ago: the calendar support will end in 2012...

    7. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1

      Will you take it to the apothecary or the cobbler to get it fixed? Or perhaps you could take your autogyro to the haberdasherer instead.

    8. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by guttentag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, Sony discontinued this product 7 years ago. I'm sure you've gotten your money's worth out of it.

      Think about it this way: If it died of hardware failure instead, would you be so upset? Likely not.

      The appliance that heats my home is 50 years old. The manufacturer has been out of business since before I was born. Thank God they didn't have this mentality or I'd be in big trouble right now. Remember that the next time you're considering a Sony product. I do. I grew up with everything Sony, but ever since they took functionality away from my PS3, over and over, I make a conscious choice not to buy their products. Even if I don't see a suitable alternative (which sometimes does happen with mid-range headphones), I'll leave the store without buying anything. Every time. You might say I got my money's worth out of the company, so I'm done with it.

    9. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      What would be your 'big trouble right now'? Having to replace an appliance that is 50 years old? What if the appliance breaks, will you be in 'big trouble right now'?

      Many products have limitations imposed on them by the external circumstances, for example if you have some water filter from ages ago, if the company goes out of business or stops supporting it, eventually you'll have to give it up even though it's not broken, because you won't be able to find replacement filters and parts for it.

      But what about all the people who will have to replace various lighting fixtures and light bulbs that are in perfect working condition just because governments dictate that the old type light-bulbs can no longer be bought legally?

    10. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

      Sony TVs lasted 10-20 yrs. So, yeah, 7 years sounds 3-13 years short.

    11. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Will you take it to the apothecary or the cobbler to get it fixed? Or perhaps you could take your autogyro to the haberdasherer instead.

      "Ending is better than Mending."

      Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

    12. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by SpzToid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I think this should ding Sony's 'green rating', because of a too-short lifespan and no little-to-none recycling-to-keep-in-use options. Is everyone expected to suddenly buy a new TV set every now and then? Gimme a break. All Sony has to do is allow user-mods to happen. Imagine if a classic car owner was not allowed to 3d-print the broken dashboard controller-thing just to keep it alive. I dunno, something like a plastic turn-signal lock doo-hickey which otherwise makes the car illegal (except when hand-signals are used). Same difference.

      http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/climate-change/cool-it/Campaign-analysis/Guide-to-Greener-Electronics.

      Admittedly I am biased because I see an old PC, and I think, 'will it run linux?'

      But then again, this is Sony that refuses even the U.S. Military the right to run linux on their paid-for playstations. Apple lost its soul a long time ago, and Sony continues to show them the way.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    13. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I guess its life cycle is reasonably longer than "lifetime warranty".

      And I mean the USER'S lifetime.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Dude, Sony discontinued this product 7 years ago. I'm sure you've gotten your money's worth out of it.

      Think about it this way: If it died of hardware failure instead, would you be so upset? Likely not.

      There is no good reason for electronics to arbitrarily fail unless a component burns out. This 'fail' is designed into the product, to force consumers to buy new. Hey, it's good for the economy that whatever you buy is meant to last for only a pre-determined finite time.

      Now maybe the younger generations are used to (and accept) this way of doing business. Us older neckbeards know different. Electronic things lasted, they were built to. I had Sony walkmans that were high-quality builds, you had to try really hard to break them. I still own an AM-FM rasio that uses 'C' batteries that still works like when it was new, that's how well things were built then. This 'throwaway-get the latest and greatest' then throw it out in 2+ years mentality does not work for me. Knowing how things today are built to not last, I think long and hard before deciding to spend my hard-earned money. I spend my $ on a hundred dollar rv, not a $1500 one, since I know the thing will only last a few years anyway, no matter if it cost more or not.

      Okay, I've had my rant here, now, goml :-)

    15. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      p.s. That should be "radio", not 'rasio', and "tv", not 'rv' (sigh)

    16. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only retired my Sony TV last year -- I had it for 15 years. It still worked fine, so it went to a new home, but CRTs are getting a little low-tech compared to HD. It was a quality product and that's why (back then when I bought it), I would have recommended Sony. The silliness you describe is why I wouldn't recommend them now. Not for years. I'm fine with hardware failure, but software failure, like this? That's just bad design from the start.

    17. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this be a case for a class action suit?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    18. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Think about it this way: If it died of hardware failure instead, would you be so upset? Likely not.

      But in this case, it's like the hardware failed only because the company sent a goon to your house to smash it.

    19. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by fa2k · · Score: 1

      You're on to something, but it's not the same as HW failure. It's a new model that has come about after the internet, where they sell a physical item + a service, where the servie is often free. It's similar to providing software updates, but it's different in that when the service ends, the product is useless.

      The expectation should be somewhere between shutting it down right after the warranty ends, and keeping it running forever. Don't know what's fair.

    20. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

    21. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I have electronics that are older than I am, and I still use them frequently. Forced obsolescence is not the same as breakage.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    22. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The expectation should be somewhere between shutting it down right after the warranty ends, and keeping it running forever. Don't know what's fair.

      I know what's fair. Opening the firmware so anyone who owns the unit can do anything he wishes with it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    23. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Even if I don't see a suitable alternative (which sometimes does happen with mid-range headphones), I'll leave the store without buying anything.

      http://www.sennheiser.ca/live/

      You're welcome.

    24. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      It's a pity the government of whichever tinpot shit-hole you're from didn't dictate that lead paint wasn't allowed in toys.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, the halogen replacements for "old-type" bulbs had the same socket, light output, physical size, colour temperature and the only real difference is lower power consumption, higher cost and longer life time. Taking lifetime and power consumption into account makes the prices similar.

    26. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Dude, Sony discontinued this product 7 years ago. I'm sure you've gotten your money's worth out of it.

      Why should the functionality be limited by an arbitrary corporate decision and a bit of code? If it fails for a hardware reason, it used to be you could continue to get it repaired for a fee as long as the parts were available.

      Having something become junk for a reason that could easily be fixed like this simply creates unnecessary e-waste.
      Where's Greenpeace now?

    27. Re:Normal End of Life cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, Sony discontinued this product 7 years ago. I'm sure you've gotten your money's worth out of it.

      Think about it this way: If it died of hardware failure instead, would you be so upset? Likely not.

      The appliance that heats my home is 50 years old. The manufacturer has been out of business since before I was born. Thank God they didn't have this mentality or I'd be in big trouble right now. Remember that the next time you're considering a Sony product. I do. I grew up with everything Sony, but ever since they took functionality away from my PS3, over and over, I make a conscious choice not to buy their products. Even if I don't see a suitable alternative (which sometimes does happen with mid-range headphones), I'll leave the store without buying anything. Every time. You might say I got my money's worth out of the company, so I'm done with it.

      If you can't find good mid-range headphones that aren't Sony branded, I'd say that you're probably not looking hard enough.

  21. wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People still watch cable television?

  22. Just don't buy them by Bazman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought a Sony DVR/DVD player about four years ago. It booted up with a choice of EPGs - a plain one, and one with additional functionality and adverts. Yes, half the screen was occupied by ads. After getting annoyed with that after about two microseconds I switched to the plain one.

    After a couple of years it started misbehaving, as these things do, telling me that the only thing on TV was 'No Channel Information'. So I thought I'd switch back and see how bad the ad-ridden one was. So I found the setting deep in the unexplored regions of the menu system and flipped.

    Same old ad-ridden screen, except this time the ads were blank placeholders. I reckon nobody wanted to advertise there, since nobody was using the annoying EPG...

    I did an upgrade from a new OS via a DVD from the Sony web site and it fixed most of the EPG blankness, but the thing has been pretty flakey from day one. I think the initial flakeyness is controlled to be just enough that you don't know if its your own fault for not reading the instructions or if it is genuine faults. Products are always released when the cost in fixing the bugs is more than the cost of handling support calls, right?

    Anyway, no more Sony for me.

    1. Re:Just don't buy them by Guppy · · Score: 1

      Same old ad-ridden screen, except this time the ads were blank placeholders. I reckon nobody wanted to advertise there, since nobody was using the annoying EPG...

      Interesting that they didn't even bother to advertise their own Sony products on the EPG. Probably nobody at the company still maintaining the advertising system, to format and schedule the ads.

  23. Screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have a brick now. Just look at ps3 with OtherOS feature being removed.

  24. Rovi is evil here, not Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rovi uses patents to make money of stuff like DVRs, EPGs and copy protection. I guess they could be called a 'patent troll'. More DVRs sold equals more money for Rovi.

    Rovi was born as Macrovision, the VCR copy protect signal. That was compulsory on video cards. So if you have a computer with composite of S-VHS out you probably paid Rovi half a dollar for that.

    1. Re:Rovi is evil here, not Sony by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      But Sony was at least stupid, by making their device unusable without the service.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Rovi is evil here, not Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, this is Slashdot. Our groupthink only permits blind hatred of Sony. Please do not interfere with your logic and facts!

    3. Re:Rovi is evil here, not Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was a choice of licensing from Rovi, or be sued for violating their patent(s).

    4. Re:Rovi is evil here, not Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the whole 'Angry Birds' series.

      Pure Evil!

    5. Re:Rovi is evil here, not Sony by greg1104 · · Score: 2

      No, there's been plenty of blind hate for Rovi/Macrovision too.

    6. Re:Rovi is evil here, not Sony by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I strongly doubt that the licensing agreement with Rovi included not giving the option to set the clock manually. Which, if I understood correctly, is the main issue of why those devices are completely non-functional.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Rovi is evil here, not Sony by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      +o

  25. Hey.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You knew damm well when you got it that it was a SONY product. And you knew damm well what that ment.

    And NOW you complain when it was you that got screwed.... Well.. i'll tell ya.. nope. it's been far too long. if you're still dealing with sony products after this much time... you're a moron.

    sony sucks. stay away from them. that's been the lesson for quite some time.

    some are slow learners it seems.

    1. Re:Hey.... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      This was 8 years ago. Sony wasn't as bad as they are now. They had a good track record in the 80's and 90's. The rootkit fiasco wasn't until 2005 The PS3 wasn't released yet.

    2. Re:Hey.... by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      Imagine the old Mercedes-Benz. Then it turns into the "new Chrysler". That is how I feel.

  26. What's the problem? by ygslash · · Score: 1

    Everyone could always use another paperweight.

  27. Why accept this? by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do you so readily accept electronic end of life as being normal?

    My SEGA Mastersystem still works.
    My SNES still works (and you can still buy controllers for them too).
    My sound system is much older than 10 years.
    I still have a working CRT TV, and a working VCR.

    Incidentally my grandma has several working pieces of electronic equipment from World War 2.

    Why are you so quick to accept that electronics need an end of life, and especially one so short? This is not the death of the medium which the DVR uses like say the move from analogue to digital TV was. This is a piece of gear with a really poor design flaw that for some reason depended on a proprietary 3rd party signal to work. Why would you accept that this 3rd party should decide when you can no longer use your electronics?

    1. Re:Why accept this? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think his apology would probably be his age. I, too, am from a time when TVs lasted 20 years+ and a used car of 10 years of age wasn't something where you're surprised if it still starts on a cold and/or rainy day, when computers were "current" for about 5 or even more years (let's be frank here, what was the lifetime of the C64? I wouldn't be surprised if it ruled for close to a decade).

      Today I should consider myself lucky if my TV still runs after 3 years, if my car doesn't break down before its 7 year cycle and don't even think that the computer you bought last year will still be able to run the next incarnation of your OS sensibly.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Why accept this? by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      and a used car of 10 years of age wasn't something where you're surprised if it still starts on a cold and/or rainy day

      You were making sense up until this point.

      Old cars rusted and the engine wore out. On the other hand modern engines tend to go forever and the cars no longer rust due to the materials used. However if you don't look after the rest then the car will become useless but that is true of any mechanical device which needs regular servicing to keep running, this was true then as well just that the car engine would die or the car rust away first!

      Of course you could only be 16, in which case your other points did not make sense (20+ years) as very modern cars seem to have added a lot of unnececery nonsence that appears just to have been added to go wrong and be so expensive to fix you may as well buy another car.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    3. Re:Why accept this? by romiz · · Score: 1

      Flash memory is nowadays only rated for 10 years retention. And that duration is valid only with a strong error correction code, and will be reduced by reading and writing. I really wonder how long today's devices will last.

    4. Re:Why accept this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Old cars rusted and the engine wore out.

      True. Suspension components wore out quickly too.
      OTOH it was all rebuildable, and it was common to do so. Even engines and transmissions. Body rust was easily if not inexpensively repaired. Dependance on electronics is what's making modern cars a nightmare, especially ASIC devices and SMT components.

      The acceptance of planned obsolesance by the populace is the sole reason for the shoddy products of today.

    5. Re:Why accept this? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      We buy flash in spite of its known degradation. The Flash makers arent purposefully making write limited devices, its the nature of the tech.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Why accept this? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      >> Old cars rusted and the engine wore out.

      True. Suspension components wore out quickly too.
      OTOH it was all rebuildable, and it was common to do so. Even engines and transmissions. Body rust was easily if not inexpensively repaired. Dependance on electronics is what's making modern cars a nightmare, especially ASIC devices and SMT components.

      The acceptance of planned obsolesance by the populace is the sole reason for the shoddy products of today.

      Oh stop. My 2000 era truck is actually MORE rebuildable than stuff from the 50's, 60's and 70's. True, you need to have access to some special electronic modules, but GM has keep most of them around and then there are junkyards for the rest. Plug and play. The wiring harnesses are much, much better than before (as long as you don't let rabbits at them). The engine and transmission and running gear are light years ahead of previous tech. Even if any of those fail, my mechanic can get parts in one jiffy. I'm actually surprised that auto manufacturers have brought the technology to where it is - you can keep a fairly modern, reasonable quality vehicle running forever if you put some money into it.

      I can get a rebuilt engine core for about $5000. Unless the frame really falls apart in a wreck or something, I can't imagine not keeping it for the next 7 - 8 years at which time I expect fuel to be scarce enough for me to want to find another transportation mode.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Why accept this? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " My 2000 era truck is actually MORE rebuildable than stuff from the 50's, 60's and 70's"

      Wait for that nuclear or solar EMP. My Duster will be there to pick you up and give you AND your truck a lift home.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Why accept this? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting..... If your Duster is STILL running by the time it catches up to me, I'll just kick the tires a bit. Then you'll have to hold it up like Fred Flintstone....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Why accept this? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      My Duster is in almost perfect condition. Not a spot of rust anywhere except on the block. Even the AC works.

      Will you be able to say the same for your truck after nearly 40 years?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    10. Re:Why accept this? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      No, but it's a 3/4 ton. Lots more rust. Bring the Duster up to SE Alaska and it will be dust in a couple of months on the outside (and inside for that matter).

      Mass hath it's privileges.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Why accept this? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Where I'm from old cars get taken off the road because they fail safety inspections, usually due to rust or crash damage. The average age of cars in my country is 12 years. Mostly Japanese imports. My current car is from 2000. My last car was from 1992, before that 1987 and 1985. None of them were sold due to engine problems. I sold them because they were starting to show signs of rust.

    12. Re:Why accept this? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Flash memory is not degraded by reading or writing. It is degraded by erasing.

    13. Re:Why accept this? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I still use many old stuff that work fine for what I need like Casio Data Bank calculator watches (150), VCR from dotcom days, 20" CRT TV from 1996, analog bone conduction hearing aid (same model since 1994), VGA and PS/2 cables for my KVMs from Y2K, analog audio, etc. I don't care for the new stuff like tablets, HDMI, mobile phones, etc.

      Get off my lawn! :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    14. Re:Why accept this? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the 80s (when I had my first car) the Japanese managed to hit the sweet spot in car manufacturing (well, sweet for the customer) where the car's body would last while the rest being still simple enough to make fixing it a matter of some common tools instead of specialized gear and computers. I had that '89 Mazda 626 well into the 2000s.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Why accept this? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Mass may have its privileges, but I live pretty much on the ocean with all that salt.

      I also have the advantage of zero electronics to blow out. Also, a good plastidipping of critical frame parts and mounts and reverse side of body panels helps.

      Alaska? Rolled through Juneau and Anchorage on a west coast road trip back starting in California in 2007. Not a problem. Road salt doesn't get past the plastidip.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Why accept this? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The wearout of flash memory is well known. This is the result of electronics that actually die and is different from what I'm talking about here. Even old TV tubes died, but we went out and got them fixed. Same with radios.

      My question to the parent was why he was willing to accept that a company suddenly tells him his perfectly working electronics are suddenly useless due to them no longer providing a service which originally did not indicate that there would be any form of end of life?

      Flash is a form of electronic failure.
      A change in technology (obsolescence) is unavoidable.
      But this is neither of those cases and for something as absurdly simple as needing a clock there should be no reason why the OP's electronics should suddenly stop working.

    17. Re:Why accept this? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Erasing is part of the writing process, unless you're only refreshing existing contents.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    18. Re:Why accept this? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You can write to a block many times without erasing. The caveat is writing can only set a bit from 1 to 0, not the other way around. Writing zeros to a block doesn't require an erase. Erasing sets all bits to 1 by forcing the charge on the insulated gate with a high voltage. This is the process that degrades the oxide layer that separates the gate..

  28. Re:Shitter Was FULL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us ignore for a moment that you're obviously completely insane.

    TEMPEST is not a 'hacking technique' it is a standard for investigations and studies of compromising emanations (CE) (see Van Eck phreaking)

  29. No 'normal' to "End of Life" cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you joking? 7 years and its now end of life? This is what companies are trying to make you think about products, buy them (for some crazy price), then throw them away in a few years. What happened to long lasting? Certainly we still have planes working from 50 years ago (yes with upgrades, but still it shows everything needs maintenance). There are many products (e.g. ovens, cars, music centers, even televisions!) which still work from over a decade ago. I think it is very ingenious of Sony to essentially 'wreck' a product which is still functioning if they would let it be so, and its a continuing trend in what Sony does continuously trying to screw over consumers.

  30. The data is broadcast, just not for this box by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

    The data is available, and broadcast, alongside ATSC signals via the PSIP system. But this particular box chose to use the proprietary system instead; I believe it provided data much farther out than the PSIP data.

  31. You buy Sony, you deserve what you get. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the root kit fiasco, and the rude manner in which Sony left
    all its US Palm device customers high and dry, no intelligent
    person should even consider buying anything sold by Sony.

    Sony are the lowest of the low, they will screw you
    and laugh about it.

    I fully expect Sony to be history in the next five years,
    but if we all stand together and boycott them it can happen
    sooner.

    1. Re:You buy Sony, you deserve what you get. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      These poor people bought their DVR's in 2004, before the rootkit fiasco.

  32. Re:When was the last time you saw something of val by Cederic · · Score: 1

    About ten minutes ago: QI.

  33. Don't buy Sony. by Scutter · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason on a very long list of reasons to not buy Sony products.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Don't buy Sony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony makes a wide range of products. I have a CD player, earbuds, speakers, and a DVD/VHS combo unit. Oh yeah, PS1 and PS2. None of those rely on third party software and libraries. None of those rely on Internet connectivity.

      So not all Sony products are bad.

  34. No sympathy by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    You bought Sony. Even if you are new here you would done a search for "Sony" before investing in any of their products. They are really, really bad news for anyone favoring openness.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  35. Panasonic uses it too. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    I have been using a panasonic DVR for about six years now. When I was with DirecTV it used to get the programming through TVGoS and everything was fine. Later when I switched to Verizon FiOS, I lost the TV guide on screen. What made it very painful was that Panasonic DVR does not have an ability to set the clock directly. It relies on this TVGoS to set the clock. So my DVR has been drifting without clock reset for years now. I am using the old VCR like interface to pick the date and time to record the show. The channel is always IN3. Then I use Verizon set top box to schedule channel changes. Very very painful.

    But I don't watch much of TV. All I record is Jay Leno, Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert, and interesting marahtons on Discovery or History. Pretty soon I am going to ditch the whole damned cable tv and switch purely to net and streaming.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  36. Don't have this issue with Comcast DVR by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    I understand that the OP already purchased the devices, but it seems to me the simpler and more reliable solution is to simply rent the devices where possible from your cable or satellite provider. When the device goes bad, they swap it out for a new one. If they decide to stop supporting a device, you don't pay for it any longer. No headaches and at around $10 - $15 per month per DVR it seems to be the better option.

  37. LG TV uses TVGOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My LG TV has a built in DVR that uses this service. It now displays the message from ROVI saying the service is going away. What can I do? The TV is less than 10 years old.

    1. Re:LG TV uses TVGOS by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      My LG TV has a built in DVR that uses this service. It now displays the message from ROVI saying the service is going away. What can I do? The TV is less than 10 years old.

      My condolences on the demise of your LG. Make an aquarium out of it. And I only wish I was joking.

  38. Glad I sold my HDD500 a long time ago by digitalaudiorock · · Score: 1

    I had one of those HDD500 DVRs for recording HD OTA for quite some time and finally sold it (for almost as much as I paid for it) about 4-5 years ago after building my MythTV system.

    While it generally was a pretty good recorder, and pretty much the only retail unit of it's kind, I grew to HATE that TV Guide OnScreen. That TV Guide system had essentially it's own firmware within the recorders firmware that was self updating...that is it would automatically update itself totally beyond your control from the OTA signal...and this didn't always go well. When the guide didn't work, the unit was essentially a paper weight for the very reason described in TFA...the assholes decided to give you NO way at all to manually set the fucking clock....a feature available in every fucking VCR made since the 80s, in a unit that retailed for over $1000...seriously??

    Good riddance...gotta love MythTV and Schedules Direct!!

  39. What do you expect? Companies are selfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Face it. "Companies are selfish." Meaning, the mores under which they operate ensures that those who make the decisions are going to do that which is best for the company/officers/share holders, not their customers. (Once upon a time, being responsive to your customers was good business. Not by today's MBAs.) Buying a company's product does not seem to constitute a binding contract (and probably wouldn't be enforced even if it was) so as soon as it is no longer in the company's interest to support a product they will stop in spite of any (misleading/false/lying) pronouncements when they sold the products. Sony is only a more pathological example of nearly all company's behavior.

    That is why I will not buy products in which there are proprietary components that I cannot replace if I choose to do so. That is why I refuse to be sucked into the walled garden approach companies are taking. I don't care if all the cool kids are doing it. Hyping cool is just a company's way of exploiting human behavior to get you to buy something that is not in your interest but in theirs. And your only leverage as a customer is to take your money elsewhere. Don't buy it if it isn't completely open. You'll only regret it in the end.

    Notice to companies: I am NOT a consumer. I am a customer. And as soon as you pull any stunts like this, I become an ex-customer... for life! And I will not stand silently by when others contemplate purchasing your defective-by-design products. (Yes, you can change, except I will be very suspicious even if you genuinely repent of your anti-customer behavior.)

  40. Built in.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... obsolescence....... at the flick of a switch in the hands of another..... Guess you'll just have to buy the next generation of built in obsolescence.

    Yeah, for Capitalism at its extreme....

  41. Thank you Sony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For your continuing work in making sure that users understand that megacorporations are evil and should be abolished.

  42. When is everyone going to learn DON'T buy Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it hurts when you do something - STOP doing it.

    Live and Learn (or die)... Evolution - amazing stuff...

  43. Fundamental error: Buyers != Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who buy Sony products are not their customers. They are a resource to be exploited.

    The only "customers" Sony or any corporation has are the stock holders.

    Corporations, particularly public corporations in the USA, are required by law to screw-over people who buy their products so they can maximize profits for their customers.

    Never, ever forget that.

  44. Lifetime services are promised, then class action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were sold a lifetime product warranty then you are entitled to your money back or for the service to be continued. It matters not why the service is no longer provided for. Read the fine print of your warranty and don't give up! That's what they want you to do. They didn't sign a contract knowing that a big percentage of people would not fight for their rights. They made the decision purely on what it will cost them one way or the other and if you don't stand up for your rights we all lose.

    For the IDIOTS that say things like "Reasonably expected" lifetime THEY ARE WRONG! The law is the law. Lifetime is the lifetime of the product unless specified differently. It isn't your lifetime or the lifetime of the manufacturing product, nor the lifetime of the company even. Should the company be bought out you still have a lifetime warranty unless, and not in every case the assets were purchased and not the business. Find a trial lawyer that does class action lawsuits as a last resort. If you have a valid claim they'll take it on for no cost to you but a big percentage of the winnings. But you will have justice if not $$$.

  45. The Solution by kbg · · Score: 1

    The solution is to never buy a Sony product. I stopped buying Sony products after the rootkit fiasco and my live has been better ever since :)

  46. Rent Them by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    Why do we have to rent them?

    Not sure about other jurisdictions, but here in British Columbia you can most certainly buy a PVR - Here's the IP TV PVR that sits in my entertainment centre:

    http://www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/telus-telus-optik-tv-500gb-hd-pvr-receiver-cis430-500-available-in-bc-ab-only-cis430-500/10193848.aspx

  47. Pfft. How about since 1997? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Sony cd/dvd player dvp-s535d still works and I bought it 12 years ago.

    Literally just yesterday I finally threw out my Sony DVP-S7000 DVD player http://sites.thestar.com.my/audio/story.asp?file=/1997/5/15tydvd that still worked perfectly. Been using that sucker since 1997 so it was 15 years old and showed no signs of dying.

    Of course that was from the days when companies were still willing to build a DVD player that weighed 7kg and sold for $1200.

  48. Re:Fundamental error: Buyers != Customers by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

    Dear liar:
    Stockholders are owners, not customers. The people who actually run the company (president, CEO, CFO, etc.) are required to act in the best interests of the owners. There are people who think that ruining the reputation of their company by cheating their customers is in their best interest, just as there are people who think that committing armed robbery is in their best interest, but they are not legally required to act in that manner.
    Judging by your warped view of things, I bet you voted for Obama.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  49. man in the middle for the win?! by awilden · · Score: 1

    So has anyone looked into the potential of reverse engineering the service/protocol and then using any of the standard man-in-the-middle attacks to direct the box to a replacement feed?

  50. DBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't Buy Sony.

    Not that others haven't done stuff like that as well, but Sony / Nosy does a lot of crap like this and worse.

    CAPTCHA: recall
    Not sure if it means "remember" that Sony treats its customers like crap?
    Or if it means "send back" the non-functional crap for a refund?

  51. Re:Fundamental error: Buyers != Customers by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    The people who actually run the company (president, CEO, CFO, etc.) are required to act in the best interests of the owners.

    Please provide a citation for this. I keep hearing this over and over. How are they "required"? Is there a law that says they must act this way or is is simply how the stockholders expect the C*Os to behave?

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  52. Re:Fundamental error: Buyers != Customers by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

    Judging by your warped view of things, I bet you voted for Obama.

    Judging by your grumpiness I bet you voted Romney.

  53. Re:Fundamental error: Buyers != Customers by luiscolorado · · Score: 1

    It's not a obscure law sitting somewhere... it's *the* law for corporations in the USA. Please Google a bit and find the requirements to incorporate and run a corporation. And yes... that law is inadequate according to game theory: the best strategy would be that corporations act in the best interest of their stock holders *and* their community/country/planet. Otherwise, there are scenarios were everybody lose. E.g., sending all the manufacturing and operations to another country: when most of the corporations do that, surprise! Nobody has a job, so nobody can buy the stuff the corporations made abroad!

  54. "Lifetime service" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When any business offers me "lifetime service", I ask whose lifetime is that: mine or yours?

  55. I heard.. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    I heard these DVR's ran Linux. Can't someone just sue for GPL infringement and get the source code that way?

  56. Yet another reason to not buy Sony products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times do you people have to get screwed by Sony before you stop buying their products. They continue to display a total lack of caring for their customers with every decision they make about a product. They do not deserve your money or support, there are always options out there rather than Sony.

  57. Is the fix a small box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you need a data stream added into the feed going into the box...one that gives the time and plausible fake data?

    It sounds like something I'd get for $23 off ebay.

  58. Forsooth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when people are convinced that a $1500 home theatre is "high end", because that's the most expensive they see at Best Buy, there's no point in explaining that a *real* high end system will cost more than a luxury car.

    "Yes, that $5000 I spent on directional interconnects from my SACD to my amp really made a difference. The Lunarize(R) Silver(TM) molecules vibrate resonantly to expand the warmth of the music, according to AudioSnob.com. Interconnects that you can plug either way you wish simply can't compete with these: forged in the light of a full moon and quenched in the blood of virgins...

    What do you mean, 'using lamp cord as speaker wire passes double blind tests'?! If you aren't paying at *least* $150/foot for oxygen-free, unobtanium speaker wire, and laying it in 'S' shaped patterns on elevated insulated stands (to reduce capacitive parasitics from the carpet of the room), then your music will sound hollow and flat, lacking any stage.

    Excuse me, I need to go start playing my ultrasonic 'wire burn-in' SACD. The wisdom of the crowd is that these interconnects really don't hit their stride until you've burned them in by playing ultrasonics for at least 128 hours. Either way, this disc was a steal at *only* $256."

    Sorry, what were we talking about? Oh, right, you were discussing the moral hazards inherent to unfettered capitalism. Carry on...

  59. MythTV by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Is there any danger of this happening with MythTV? If Schedules Direct shut down, or if their provider (I believe it's Zap2It) ended the service, what would MythTV users do?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:MythTV by digitalaudiorock · · Score: 1

      I didn't notice this when you originally replied. I'd say there's very little chance of that. You're probably not aware of the history of all that, but originally zap2it.com (owned by Tribune Media Services) had a free interface for their listings, but eventually announced that they could not continue to support it. As a result, Schedules Direct came about via a collaboration of MythTV and similar open source projects who worked out a deal with TMS. They pay Tribune Media Services for listing data, which is why they charge a small amount ($20 a year) for subscriptions. All in all, this is probably a decent revenue source for TMS. I'm not saying it's impossible for there to be a problem with it some day, but I think it's very unlikely.

  60. Re:Shitter Was FULL! by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Investigating compromising emanations such as from keyboards, mice, screens, etc. most certainly is a hacking technique, just as calling and pretending to be the telephone repairman who needs the numbers printed on the bottom of the router is a hacking technique.

  61. They Did You A Favor by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 0

    Less TV = Higher Quality Life. There are so many more enriching things to with your life. Just shut the damn thing off.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  62. Three words by DaveJ45 · · Score: 2

    If the listing service was truly marketed by Sony as lifetime, then there is a solution that can be described in three simple words- Class Action Lawsuit. Why not? Everyone else does it, and it's not like owners of these devices have anything to lose by giving this approach a try. And there is certainly no shortage of lawyers willing to go after big corporations for their share of the 'take'

    --
    Differences between how you act when some one is watching, and how you act when no one is watching, define who you are
  63. PBS by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    There's a timecode embedded in the broadcast from PBS, why not just get that?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  64. Re:Fundamental error: Buyers != Customers by unitron · · Score: 1

    Go Google "fiduciary responsibility"

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  65. Use PC and auto-prune commercials win-win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No really, if you're not thrilled with using your PC to operate your DVR, consider spending about $200 or less to build your own DVR / Entertainment center that fits nicely somewhere in your living room. And then if you want to go at it even further, subscribe to hulu plus and a few other things and ditch cable tv all together like I have. If a show is not available online legally, pirate it. It's the only way to get them to stop being exclusively on cable. It seemed to work in the past thanks to supply and demand. Of course, I'm making a lot of sense here so this might be confusing to many.

  66. You deserve to get shafted, you bought Sony. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    I'm not even trying to be a ahole this time, but this is exactly what you get for buying Sony products. They are the most consumer unfriendly, greedy fucks on the planet. Other companys will screw you over sometimes as well, but Sony plans on it as a business practice.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  67. Re:I will never buy a Brother product again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you're doing real well to have Linux support at all - many many printers I've found without any Linux support, including a Lexmark multi function machine I bought which is still in manufacture but Lexmark have 'no plans' to offer Linux support. And the same can be true of Windows too - a new version of Windows means no upgrade or a new printer for many, cos not all units get a driver upgrade.

  68. okay by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    So just use tivo or any of the other DVR systems that get guide data from an internet connection. It's not as if there were a shortage of such systems. Sux for the people who bought this device but other than that group, I don't see what the big deal is.

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion