Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Typing Advice For a Guinness World Record Attempt?

An anonymous reader writes "In fifth grade, I amazed my fellow classmates when I demonstrated what 132 words per minute looked like. Recently, an acquaintance of mine saw me typing out a word document for graduate school and was impressed by my typing abilities. He suggested that I seriously contemplate attempting a Guinness World Record with such abilities. At the moment, I can manage an average of about 155-160 words per minute, with bursts around 180-185 words per minute (in the typing world, five characters defines a word, in case you were wondering). That aside, I have a few questions to pose to Slashdot readers (whom I am sure have been typing much longer than I have): What are some tips to fully maximize one's ability to type at the fastest possible rate? Do you have any specific keyboard recommendations that will improve my speed? Has anybody here ever competed in a typing event or thought about going for the world record? Is it worth learning Dvorak for the sole purpose of attempting such a record? How difficult would it be to improve my typing abilities from where they are now to where they need to be to acquire such a record?"

307 comments

  1. Cut and Paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If I copy a whole document into my buffer and then paste it, I can do way more than that ;)

    1. Re:Cut and Paste by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Depends; does ctrl+v count as 1 or 2 characters typed?

      I manage some ~50 words per minute; better than most typists (I have been trained as one over 20 years ago), but not even remotely close to world record speeds.
      Speed is of no use to a programmer, though the ability to type blindly and without requiring attention is. Being a trained typist means you can focus completely on the content without being distracted by the hunt-and-peck routine most programmers use.

      DVORAK should help improve typing speed, but at the cost of a lot of re-training. You may have the benefit of trained fingers, but you have to train the "automation" completely from the start.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:Cut and Paste by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 0

      DVORAK should help improve typing speed, but at the cost of a lot of re-training.

      /jcyaycrb b..e.e=

      Crap!

      [citation needed]

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Cut and Paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a trained typist means you can focus completely on the content without being distracted by the hunt-and-peck routine most programmers use.

      It's understandable if hunt-and-peck would distract you personally, but I doubt (hope) the majority of programmers don't get distracted by something that benign. It's not like we can't continue our train of thoughts because we're looking at the keyboard instead of the screen, and usually by the time one starts typing (again hopefully) one has already gone through the thought process and made a decision.

    4. Re:Cut and Paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't just about train of thought. Sometimes, one has to retype something, and being able to retype it without having to constantly switch focus between the original document and the keyboard is useful. I had coworkers ask me to type in (for example) software activation keys because they couldn't get them right after several tries (since they were hunting and pecking), while I could type them in as fast as I type anything else.

  2. Re:Hello? Editors? by Emmeau · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's redundant! It's redundant!

  3. Re:Hello? Editors? by mcarp · · Score: 1

    Therefore fake.

  4. Bad place to ask by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most /.ers are far from good typists. You can tell by the typos.

    1. Re:Bad place to ask by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Programmers and IT workers are actually rather bad typist.

      Just because we are on a computer all day... It doesn't mean we are typing all the time, we are Programmers not data entry. If we end find that we are typing too much we write a program to do it for us.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Bad place to ask by thereitis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A problem I find is that my muscle memory is tied to typing computer terms, so I often misspell ordinary words as a similar, computing-related word. I've never progressed past 106wpm (probably not that fast anymore as I've gotten a little sloppy). I can't really imaging 'scaling up' to 160 wpm without making a personal breakthrough on typing efficiency.

    3. Re:Bad place to ask by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      We use an instant messenger product at work, and the programmers often use it to ask me questions. I will spend about 20-30 seconds to type a 4-6 sentence response. They will take 2 minutes to respond with 4-5 words. BTW, you can see when they are responding, so I know they are typing the entire time.

    4. Re:Bad place to ask by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like I tell my wife, "I may not be good, but at least I'm fast!"

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:Bad place to ask by bojanb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      He, and I thought I was crazy. When typing fast, every time I try to write "serve", my hands automatically type "server". Every single time.

    6. Re:Bad place to ask by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      because they couldn't type one word and then go and look up something in another window or anything.

      By that metric I type about 1 word a hour - given how many times I've not pressed enter and have hence been responding for about 14 hours until I press enter the next day.

    7. Re:Bad place to ask by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Well normally, when I have to IM, I will tend to go back and re filter my response.

      For example...
      You: The system is down.
      Me: It has been up all day check your pc. ^M^M^M^M^M^M^M^M^M^M^M^M^M^M Let me check, maybe something is of.
      You: Let me know it when it is back up.
      Me: ok. (I go and find and fix the problem) It should be good now.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re: Bad place to ask by PHPNerd · · Score: 1

      Me too! Every blasted time.

    9. Re:Bad place to ask by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      I understand your point, and I don't get angry about this...but I have told IT ppl and non-IT ppl I work with this before as a polite FYI....It can't take you much more than 5 seconds to type "one sec".

    10. Re:Bad place to ask by raymorris · · Score: 5, Funny

      Same here. Also many of my IM messages end with ":wq"

    11. Re:Bad place to ask by laejoh · · Score: 0

      There's 3 ways to make love!

      The good way

      The bad way

      And the Max Power way

      And as The Man himself would say: Nobody *snuggles* with Max Power, Marge. You strap yourself in and feel the Gs!

    12. Re:Bad place to ask by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you end every sentence with a semi-colon?

    13. Re:Bad place to ask by Bogtha · · Score: 2

      It is funny though when somebody sees me typing at full speed not realising that autocompletion is increasing my output by a factor of 3-4. Also: Hacker Typer.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    14. Re:Bad place to ask by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well normally while they are typing one sec, they are busy looking up the issue. They would prefer to have the answer right after you asked them. But they wanted to check it out. So they may have instinctively tried to answer your question... Then went to double check thus the delay in typing...

      Just because the IM is saying they are typing a response it doesn't mean they are busy typing in a response.
      Heck In the middle of this response, I had to stir my lunch that is in the microwave.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He programs in Python.

    16. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here.

      So, no.

    17. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Isn't the Max Power way the bad way?"

      "But FASTER!"

    18. Re:Bad place to ask by QuesarVII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or you could be polite and realize it takes a minute to figure something out sometimes, and not demand immediate responses. You should expect a delay in many situations.

    19. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno...I think we're actually pretty damn fast at typing. CTRL+SPACE really helps up the speed.

      But in all seriousness, I find there are two classes of programmers...those of us that cut our teeth in the all text days and wasted innumerable hours on IRC and the like and those who didn't. I could barely manage 20 wpm prior to getting into programming, but I've been over 100 wpm ever since. There's really no substitute for real-time chat...there's a need for immediacy that forces people to learn to express themselves rapidly. You can see this in the younger generation's ability to enter characters into mobile phones.

    20. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I use others's computers for IM, I end with :WQ

    21. Re:Bad place to ask by sco08y · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We use an instant messenger product at work, and the programmers often use it to ask me questions. I will spend about 20-30 seconds to type a 4-6 sentence response. They will take 2 minutes to respond with 4-5 words. BTW, you can see when they are responding, so I know they are typing the entire time.

      It's called editing.

    22. Re:Bad place to ask by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      1 word a (sic) hour is only 24 words a day, whether you leave your computer overnight or not... Did that slashdot post take you more than 2 days to write??

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    23. Re:Bad place to ask by PRMan · · Score: 1

      No, it's true. I hate IM because I type over 90 wpm and the other person types 5-10. So my side takes 2 seconds and then I wait a minute for the response.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    24. Re:Bad place to ask by PRMan · · Score: 1

      There's 3 ways to make love!

      Good, fast and cheap? Pick two?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    25. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes;

    26. Re:Bad place to ask by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      every time I try to write "serve", my hands automatically type "server"

      try typing "Linus" sometime!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    27. Re:Bad place to ask by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Assuming the record is 200+ wpm then he'd need to hit keys at more than 20 keys per second (assuming average of 5 character words + 1 spacebar).

      If he can't beat that just by pressing keys as if typing at max speed but without caring for correctness, then dvorak isn't going to help him.

      Lastly, I wonder if there are rules against the use of performance enhancing drugs for typing world records ;).

      --
    28. Re:Bad place to ask by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Do you know what "by that metric means"?

      Or do you think I posted that slashdot comment from an IM client?

    29. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try typing "winword", I promise it comes out as "windows". I've been typing way (way!) too many functional designs...

    30. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what sarcasm is? Geez.. You aren't the only snarky one on the Inter-tubes you know.

    31. Re:Bad place to ask by maestroX · · Score: 1

      We use an instant messenger product at work, and the programmers often use it to ask me questions. I will spend about 20-30 seconds to type a 4-6 sentence response. They will take 2 minutes to respond with 4-5 words. BTW, you can see when they are responding, so I know they are typing the entire time.

      It's called editing.

      Nah, the managers use the messenger at work, we programmers like to, you know, program.
      We're typing the entire time, cause doctor.el is running in another buffer.
      Only bugger is reading Slashdot in w3m mode.

    32. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but that's on Slashdot, but in the typing world, how does that compare to the typing world?

    33. Re:Bad place to ask by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The "user is typing..." message lies. Do not assume the user is typing just because it says so.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm slow, but I'm rough!

    35. Re:Bad place to ask by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      We use an instant messenger product at work, and the programmers often use it to ask me questions.
      Shame on them. A programmer should know that a product such as IM is disastrous to productivity. It can take half an hour to get back into the groove after being interrupted by an IM. We also use IM where I work, and I answer it whenever I get to a good stopping point in whatever I am working on. Of course, I answer e-mails just as quickly, and e-mails also have the benefit of being able to attach documents and leave a paper trail, so IM becomes useless. People have been told repeatedly that no one may do any work as a result of an IM and yet we continue to get requests to do work over IM and if you ignore them, people get pissy.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    36. Re:Bad place to ask by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      I can type much more faster than that any One-Time-Pad crypto page.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    37. Re:Bad place to ask by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      This happens to me when switching between languages.
      I tend to write "como" instead of "come", since "como" is a rather common word in spanish (my everyday language is spanish).

    38. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this a lot. Has no one ever used ":x" ?

    39. Re:Bad place to ask by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Lastly, I wonder if there are rules against the use of performance enhancing drugs for typing world records ;).

      How about experience enhancing drugs, and predictive input?

    40. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or multitasking.

    41. Re:Bad place to ask by johnsnails · · Score: 1

      You are being funny but I often finish with

      shift + z + z

      Shorthand way of doing what you said.

    42. Re:Bad place to ask by wbic16 · · Score: 1

      You really should re-train yourself to use ":x" - you could be saving an entire keystroke per IM message!

    43. Re:Bad place to ask by fisted · · Score: 1

      i see what you did there

    44. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use ":x" instead. You're welcome

    45. Re:Bad place to ask by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Actually, 'Same here." isn't sentence; it is a sentence fragment.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    46. Re:Bad place to ask by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "They will take 2 minutes to respond with 4-5 words. BTW, you can see when they are responding, so I know they are typing the entire time."

      Sure ... but you can't see what their other hand is doing.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    47. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also many of my IM messages end with ":wq"

      You should learn "ZZ". Saves a key press.

    48. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you end every sentence with a semi-colon?

      woosh

    49. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only when I have had to many cups of Java;

    50. Re:Bad place to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never, ever understood why the fuck would people use :wq when :x is 33% faster for the same result. Did I miss anything ?

    51. Re:Bad place to ask by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Programmers and IT workers are actually rather bad typist. [...] we are Programmers not data entry [...]. [...] If we end find

      Some are bad typists. Some are just think cunts.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    52. Re:Bad place to ask by nekoken · · Score: 1

      I've used versions of vi on various unixes where :x wasn't supported.

    53. Re:Bad place to ask by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 1

      1) Finger memory.
      2) :w and :q exist as separate commands with numerous other combinations (:wa, :wqa, :wn) so :wq fits more naturally into that family.
      3) If you want to use a shortcut for :wq, ZZ requires even fewer keystrokes (shift z z versus shift : x enter).

      Between the three of those, :x never really seems preferable.

  5. I didn't catch that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In what world does 5 characters define a word? Must've missed it.

    Editors: edit much?

    1. Re:I didn't catch that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the editing world, editors edit documents in the editing world in case you were wondering.

    2. Re:I didn't catch that... by repetty · · Score: 2

      In what world does 5 characters define a word?

      When I took a typing class back in the mid-70's on an Underwood 5 manual typewriter, I do believe that a word was 5-characters -- and that does not include the space between the words. The standard is surely older than you are, whipper snapper.

      --Richard

    3. Re:I didn't catch that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, all those years of experience didn't clue you in on the joke, old fogey.

      In other words: WHOOSH

    4. Re:I didn't catch that... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Jokes are supposed to be funny.

    5. Re:I didn't catch that... by mfnickster · · Score: 2

      "In a world where all words are five letters... one man can make the difference between brilliance and darkness..."

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    6. Re:I didn't catch that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 356 years old. Don't call me a whipper snapper, whipper snapper!

    7. Re:I didn't catch that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to explain. The OP was simply making a snide remark in reference to the repetition in this line in the summary:

      (in the typing world, five characters defines a word in the typing world, in case you were wondering).

      He/she likely cares nothing for how many characters actually define a word (in the typing world, of course) nor how long it has been a standard definition of a word (typing world again) but just wanted to take a shot at the abysmal editing of only a paragraph of text.

    8. Re:I didn't catch that... by TheGothicGuardian · · Score: 5, Funny

      <movietrailervoice>"In a world where all words are five letters... one man can make the difference between brilliance and darkness..."</movietrailervoice>

      "Innna world where allll words arrre fiive lttrs... onnne mannn cannn maake theee dfrnc betwn brlnc annnd drkns..."

    9. Re:I didn't catch that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you nearly got disemvoweled, there.

    10. Re:I didn't catch that... by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Brought to you be the Department of Redundancy Dept.

  6. Slow Down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the typing world, it's an unforced error to repeat yourself in the typing world. I think you're going too fast.

  7. Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't listen to the people who are invested and have learned to type on Dvoraks: scientific evidence shows that Dvorak is no better than a regular keyboard layout. So you will just be re-training yourself to be unable to type on QWERTY's and type slower on Dvorak's.

    1. Re:Dvorak bad by xonen · · Score: 2

      Sais someone who obviously didn't take the time to learn him/herself Dvorak.

      The only disadvantage i found - as Dvorak typer - is compatability with games. For any other purpose like typing text and programming, i like it and will never go back to qwerty. I'm not telling anyone they should learn Dvorak, i'm also not saying it's superior - it's a matter of personal taste. And yes, once you learn it you will notice it performs as promised. Also, these days Dvorak is thus widely accepted, that international keyboard layouts are supported on almost any platform. A thing to consider may be your native language, but my native language (dutch) has simular letter frequencies to english.

      Having said that, for the sole purpose of breaking a record, it is definitively not worth to learn it. It will take you years to get the same accuracy and speed as you find yourself now using Qwerty. If any, i'd say, set the record, then learn Dvorak, and try again in 8 years. If you want to learn it, personal interest should be your motivation.

      --
      A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
    2. Re:Dvorak bad by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Another Dvorak disadvantage is that sometimes you type "simular" instead of "similar".

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...scientific evidence shows that Dvorak is no better than a regular keyboard layout.

      Correction: a single study done in 1956 showed no speed advantage for Dvorak.

      What is a demonstrated fact is that your fingers travel far less distance typing English on a Dvorak keyboard than on QWERTY, which is undisputed.

    4. Re:Dvorak bad by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Colemak is much easier to learn with very similar letter frequency improvements. It only took me about a month to return to my original typing speed and then it just kept getting faster. Unfortunately colemak is not pre-installed in windows (even windows 7 doesn't have it), but Mac and every Linux distro have it.

      If you learn colemak, then ever have to use a querty system, you will be absolutely astonished at home many of the most common keys you use are on the top and bottom rows in querty. In colemak ~80% of your keystrokes are just direct finger pushes, no moving.

    5. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and "Sais" instead of "Says"...

    6. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sais the person who didn't notice GP's first word!

    7. Re:Dvorak bad by QuesarVII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He already said his native language was dutch. Overall his English was very good. It was much better than the majority of native English speakers.

      Don't be a dick.

    8. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...scientific evidence shows that Dvorak is no better than a regular keyboard layout.

      Correction: a single study done in 1956 showed no speed advantage for Dvorak.

      As opposed to the Navy study done in 1944 that Dvorak himself helped design?

      What is a demonstrated fact is that your fingers travel far less distance typing English on a Dvorak keyboard than on QWERTY, which is undisputed.

      Yes, which is only useful for reducing repetitive strain injuries, and there are better keyboard layouts than Dvorak for that.

      The fact is, in the time that it takes a person to become fully competent in Dvorak typing, they could've been training their normal typing and improved far more than simply switching to Dvorak.

    9. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. If you need yet another way to be eccentric, learn Dvorak. Kudos on all the typos too, really convincing.

    10. Re:Dvorak bad by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      How did you measure that? Maybe it's only 'better' because it's better in your mind (you went out, bought a keyboard, learned to type on it so you must have had a strong belief before you even started).

      All empirical tests show Dvorak is no faster (PS: the myth that qwerty was designed to be slow is... a myth. Qwerty won several typing speed competitions before it was chosen).

      There's claims that Dvorak reduces RSI but they're also unproven.

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:Dvorak bad by dynamo · · Score: 1

      Yes, which is only useful for reducing repetitive strain injuries, and there are better keyboard layouts than Dvorak for that.

      Really? Name one. and please include links..

    12. Re:Dvorak bad by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'm Romanian. Your point is, again...?
      Anyway, I was trying to be funny. Seems that the spirit of Christmas doesn't make people more receptive to jokes. Oh well...

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    13. Re: Dvorak bad by Skater · · Score: 1

      I used Dvorak for 6 or 8 years. I may have been slightly faster with it, but it wasn't worth the hassles. I gave up on it a decade or so ago.

    14. Re: Dvorak bad by Skater · · Score: 1

      Also Slashdot's mobile beta thoroughly sucks. This was supposed to be a reply to the GP. I have no idea how it landed here. Hopefully this lands as a reply to my original mislocated message!

    15. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were trying to be funny then the correct response here would be to apologise for the way your joke came across. Whether you meant it or not, your comment did make you come across as being a dick. Just take it as a lesson about what type of jokes don't work with people who don't know you and move on.

    16. Re:Dvorak bad by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Cowards teaching morality. On Slashdot, no less. Now THAT's a joke!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colemak ends up sometimes better, sometimes worse than Dvorak on a 60-40 ratio for Colemak.
      Here's a link for you.

      But really, there's Workman, based on Colemak to be even more typing friendly. Scroll down to the book listings (starting with Don Quixote) for the various stats on what it would have taken to write each book.

      If you want to dispute it, make sure to include links.

    18. Re:Dvorak bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Romanian simular to Dutch?

    19. Re:Dvorak bad by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They are exactly the same. Both are gibberish (to me).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:Dvorak bad by war4peace · · Score: 1

      The GGGP tried to excuse the ...GGGGGP? Anyway, was trying to excuse his typo(s) by referring to Dutch as the guy's native language. Now I know how to differentiate a typo from a possible lack of English knowledge (I ignored "sais" and "incompatability" as having incomplete knowledge as root cause). But "simular" is very, very likely a typo, both on Dvorak and QWERTY keyboards.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    21. Re:Dvorak bad by swalve · · Score: 1

      It wasn't designed to be slow, it was designed to reduce the chances of typewriter arms jamming up against one another.

    22. Re:Dvorak bad by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It wasn't designed to be slow

      That's what I said...

      --
      No sig today...
  8. Hepl offreed by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cotnact me if your gonig for teh recrod. I am a nexpret in tiipyng and can gvie you ltos of usfeul tips .

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

    1. Re:Hepl offreed by tkjtkj · · Score: 0

      that was a RIOT!!! tnx!

      --
      "There are 11 kinds of people: those who know binary, those who don't, and those who could not care less!"
    2. Re:Hepl offreed by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      It's too bad you didn't keep at least the first and last letters of each word correct. People might not have noticed!

  9. PS2 VS USB? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    PS2 VS USB?

    what one can handle faster input?

    1. Re:PS2 VS USB? by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do they have USB 3.0 keyboards yet? That could handle millions or words per minute...

    2. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It isn't the interface that is a problem, neither introduce extreme latency, the big thing for me are the actual switches in the keyboard and key spacing. For example I can generally type faster on mechanical-switch keyboards, either the buckling springs (think IBM Model M Keyboard) or something more modern (I use MX Browns at work on a Das Keybaord with blank keycaps, keeps people who can't type off my workstation :P).

      USB and PS2 is the wrong question, switch type is the correct question.

    3. Re:PS2 VS USB? by TrashyMG · · Score: 1

      I know USB can't handle as many simultaneous key hits as PS/2.. but don't see how that would apply here.

    4. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      USB easily; a DualShock 2 controller is lousy for picking letters at any decent speed.

    5. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Monster cables.

    6. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that. ADB.

    7. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS/2 keyboards allow n-key rollover, whereas USB can only offer limited rollover. This only matters if you're using chording however, but it should be pointed out.

    8. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For tyiping, that's an absolute irrelevant question.

      "A PS/2 keyboard clock can be anywhere between 60 and 100uS wide .. and that corresponds to a serial rate of 10000 to 16667 baud .."

      which corrsponds to about 1000 chars per SECOND.
      USB is faster still when running at a minimal rate of 1.5 megabit per second (.15 megabytes per second).

      Compare that with 180 5-letter words per MINUTE.

    9. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could handle millions or words per minute...

      be specific. millions or words, which is it?

    10. Re:PS2 VS USB? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      One BILLION words.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    11. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      For a long time back in the PS2 adapter days, I found that at the speed I typed, any capitalized word ending in UCK would drop the K. The first few times I thought it was a typo but after the third or fourth time I experimented with it and discovered that if I held down left shift and went across those three keys, the keyboard would almost always drop the K. You didn't even have to type it that quickly.

      Fortunately newer keyboards seem to have resolved that issue, or at least I can't seem to reproduce it on my current USB keyboard.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    12. Re:PS2 VS USB? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      USB can handle multiple keypresses jsut fine, if it has a decent encoder. Most el cheapo keyboards have key limits.

      --
      Good-bye
    13. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, that phenomenon is known as rollover.

    14. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you typed "FUCK" a lot?

    15. Re:PS2 VS USB? by draconx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know USB can't handle as many simultaneous key hits as PS/2.. but don't see how that would apply here.

      This is only half true. The 6+4 simultaneous key limit is part of the HID boot protocol for keyboards, which is a restricted subset of the USB HID interface meant for limited environments such as the system boot firmware.

      The full USB HID protocol has no such limits, but it seems that most keyboards only support the boot protocol for whatever reason.

    16. Re:PS2 VS USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keyboard issue, not interface.

  10. Why is this posted AC? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Seriously as there are many people here (myself included) that do not respond to Anonymous Cowards. I would have thought the person doing this would want everybody to know who they are so that they will gain noteriety in the lead up to their attempt.

    Very impressive numbers, but I would have thought there would be a YouTube video or somesuch which backed up the claim.

    If I submitted as AC, would the editors accept my claim to my questions regarding my unusually long eyebrows, which irritate my eyes and I can't control with shaving, waxing, plucking, laser or electrolysis as well as let me know who else has this problem and what they are doing about it?

    myke

    1. Re:Why is this posted AC? by PmanAce · · Score: 1

      Trim them with a razor, just like if you were trimming a beard. All in all, I just typed this in 38 words per minute. (or in the typing world of 5 letters or more: 9 words per minute).

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    2. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hate on the ACs? This isn't slashdot of yesteryear, the flamebait is gone man, the flamebait is gone...so is the spot in my mind I kept my password at. Q_Q

    3. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never had a Slashdot account, though I've been posting here for years. Your sort of bigotry is not nearly incentive enough.
      I've had several dozen +5 first posts over the years, and have made a positive contribution to many discussions.
      What does it matter what silly pseudonym is displayed above a good comment, or how many digits are in the number next to it?
      Even if the submission is completely made up, the discussion will still be meaningful.

      Now on topic: if the submitter's been typing QWERTY mad-fast since fifth grade or before, I find it hard to believe he can do any better with Dvorak.

    4. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Jetra · · Score: 0

      I never AC because I'm boss like that and I don't care what the rest of you dunderheads think.

    5. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously as there are many people here (myself included) that do not respond to Anonymous Cowards.

      ..... I'm not sure if you're lying or just wrong, since you just replyed to an AC.

    6. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or in the typing world of 5 letters or more: 9 words per minute in the typing world

      FTFY

    7. Re:Why is this posted AC? by adolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What does it matter what silly pseudonym is displayed above a good comment, or how many digits are in the number next to it?

      Simple: In a discussion, I like to know if discussing with the same person, a different person, or with several people.

      I also prefer some level of surety that the person I'm replying to might actually read it.

      I do realize that logging in on /. offers no guarantee of either of these things, but it's a start.

      Meanwhile, I killfile all reply notifications that come from Anonymous Cowards because doing so makes discussing things on /. feel more like conversing with humans instead of talking at a wall.

      If I wanted an anonymous place to randomly comment on the world with no sense of personification, I'd just go over to pastebin and be ignored there instead.

    8. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over the years I've submitted 2 or 3 articles as AC that were accepted and which garnered plenty of discussion. I've also got plenty of comments over the years with +5 Insightful or +5 Informative. The fact that I prefer to post as AC does not negate the possibility that what I say could be valid and of interest to others. I know my comment will get discounted because I haven't set up a /. account, but I'm willing to live with that for the sake of privacy.

      Apparently the editors are still willing to consider submissions regardless of the identity of the source (if that wasn't obvious already from some of the stuff that makes it through :-)). You are also free to ignore my comments or filter them out as you like. I don't mind the possibility that I'm tossing my message out into the ocean and no one may ever find the bottle with it inside.

    9. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously as there are many people here (myself not included) that do not respond to Anonymous Cowards. I would have thought the person doing this would want everybody to know who they are so that they will gain noteriety in the lead up to their attempt.

      Very impressive numbers, but I would have thought there would be a YouTube video or somesuch which backed up the claim.

      If I submitted as AC, would the editors accept my claim to my questions regarding my unusually long eyebrows, which irritate my eyes and I can't control with shaving, waxing, plucking, laser or electrolysis as well as let me know who else has this problem and what they are doing about it?

      myke

      There fixed that for you.

    10. Re:Why is this posted AC? by jamesh · · Score: 2

      I've never had a Slashdot account, though I've been posting here for years. Your sort of bigotry is not nearly incentive enough.
      I've had several dozen +5 first posts over the years, and have made a positive contribution to many discussions.
      What does it matter what silly pseudonym is displayed above a good comment, or how many digits are in the number next to it?
      Even if the submission is completely made up, the discussion will still be meaningful.

      Hooray for your +5 posts, but i've also seen you say some really really stupid things over the years.

      And all those nigger comments are _not_ appreciated.

    11. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple: In a discussion, I like to know if discussing with the same person, a different person, or with several people.

      So in other words vanity and politics are what's most important to you, not the actual subject of discussion.

      Look in the mirror: you're what's wrong with the world.

    12. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I considered writing the parent a carefully-crafted response with further arguments to make him discriminate less against ACs... but then the "Meanwhile, I killfile all reply notifications that come from Anonymous Cowards" sunk into my mind and I lost the motivation. I will keep answering ACs (and I post often, getting moded up quite frequently) but the next time I the parent's post, I'll remember not to reply. Other ACs might not read replies (though we usually do check a couple of times) but when it comes to him, I'll know that my efforts to contribute to the discussion will be wasted.

      He might think that this result is the best one for creating meaningful conversations but I respectfully disagree.

    13. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meaningful discussion with humans... On Slashdot... Bwahahaha!

    14. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because spending a few minutes registering an account on a disposable email address really identifies you properly.

    15. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anonymous communication forces people to evaluate statements made based solely on those statements and not on the misuse of a poster's previous reputation.

      All too often you see people using or abusing their authority because they can. This is even worse on forums with post counts, karma and join dates etc... And people like you fall right into that trap of just dismissing anonymous people because their words might actually stand on their own.

    16. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are just jealous that I, Anonymous Coward, gets all the cute *members of the particular species that you prefer*. Just because you can't get laid, and I can, doesn't mean you should take it out on me. I'm sure there is a *member of the particular species that you prefer* out there for you. Though I'm sure I'll have already fucked them. Cheers.

    17. Re:Why is this posted AC? by downhole · · Score: 1

      I think it matters because you create an identity for yourself. If I reply to your post and you reply back, then I know that it's the same person, and not some other guy who thought it would be funny to pretend to be you. If you reply to my post and some other guy also does, posting as AC, how do I know which one is you? How do I even know if what you are saying is true? With an account, I can click on your name and read all of your previous posts. As an AC, you could be pretending to be somebody else or making the whole thing up entirely.

      And of course, it's good for the site, because having an identity gives people an incentive to post quality stuff and not post incoherent nonsense and flames.

      I've mostly stopped replying to ACs who reply to my posts, because in my experience, 90% of AC replies are nonsensical flames. If there's anything with less of a point to it than having an internet discussion with someone whose reply to your post is a nonsensical attack, it's having that discussion with an AC, where you don't even know if it's the same person, or if they will see your reply at all.

      --
      I don't reply to ACs
    18. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many people here (myself included) that do not respond to Anonymous Cowards

      ::brain explodes::

      So glad you don't respond to anonymous cowards. You wouldn't want to encourage the rabble.

      --AC

    19. Re:Why is this posted AC? by adolf · · Score: 1

      and I post often, getting moded up quite frequently

      And how, pray tell, will I be able to know that if you're posting as an AC? It's just an idle assertion, and there's no way for you to back it up.

      I used to give ACs an automatic +1 to put their comments on equal footing with others. I stopped doing that years ago when the signal to noise ratio got too bad for my liking.

    20. Re:Why is this posted AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I post often, getting moded up quite frequently

      And how, pray tell, will I be able to know that if you're posting as an AC? It's just an idle assertion, and there's no way for you to back it up.

      For you it's just an idle assertion. However, you're not the only person on slashdot and some of us don't give shit about what you'll be able to know.

      PS. I'm not the original AC.

  11. Just do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it worth learning Dvorak for the sole purpose of attempting such a record?

    Only you can make this assessment of "worth".

    How difficult would it be to improve my typing abilities from where they are now to where they need to be to acquire such a record?

    Why do you want a prediction about the difficulty of something? If you heard "very difficult", would you not try? If so, then you haven't decided to be the best in the world at something.

  12. Dvorak by yurik · · Score: 2

    I learnt it during a summer internship in about a week, and never looked back to qwerty. This is purely a preference, and I heard both positives (speed) and negatives (fingers don't move as much so causes more rep strain injuries). It def improved my overall typing speed, but caused some grief when using CTRL+ZXCV and also in various games with one hand on keyboard (usually switch back to qwerty for them). You won't have as much problem switching because you already got the motorics skills down, just need to have the new layout in your head. Btw, switching back and forth between layouts takes about a few seconds for my head.

    1. Re:Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to many references on the Wikipedia article, the Dvorak thing being faster is a myth. The only study to show significant positive improvement with Dvorak keyboards was conducted by Dvorak himself in an effort to sell a bunch of keyboards to the US Navy. The tests are flawed in many ways - and there is a suggestion that this was done deliberately in order to defraud the Navy. Subsequent tests have failed to show any improvement in typing speeds with Dvorak.

    2. Re:Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is both a true and false statement. For better understanding, replace 'speed' by 'convenience'.

      For various reasons, any benchmark is skewed. Eventually, a person using qwerty could - by definition - type just as fast as any other keyboard layout, simply because the number of keystrokes are the same. Also, most typists are used to qwerty starting from their youth, leading to a very strong motoric memory.

      If you would reverse the question, a world where everyone typed on Dvorak, and someone tried to sell a qwerty keyboard, it would seriously get laughed at.

      Question yourself - why do relative many people take effort to learn Dvorak, and a large amount of them state they don't want to go back? Is that because it's an inferior layout? Are all those people fooling themselves? Or could it be that 'qwerty is good enough too', and that a learning curve to another layout is long, and in the beginning, pretty steep?

      I don't type on Dvorak because it's faster. I use it because i am _lazy_. And for what a wiki reference is worth - it's the same as saying 'i don't like swiss cheese because it's not proven tastier or healthier'. Or, for that matter 'linux must suck because everyone uses windows'. It's worth for what it's worth and admittingly, most people will not want to switch and will seek arguments to support their case as needed.

      2012 - and Dvorak's study is just as outdated as any literature or benchmark regarding the matter. Yet, automagically it has gained momentum starting in the 90's. Go figure...

    3. Re:Dvorak by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Question yourself - why do relative many people take effort to learn Dvorak, and a large amount of them state they don't want to go back? Is that because it's an inferior layout? Are all those people fooling themselves? Or could it be that 'qwerty is good enough too', and that a learning curve to another layout is long, and in the beginning, pretty steep?

      Fallacious argument. This is like saying "Look at all the people converting to Uam and not changing to another religion afterward".

    4. Re:Dvorak by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      That was meant to bs Islam not Uam.

    5. Re:Dvorak by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Question yourself - why do relative many people take effort to learn Dvorak, and a large amount of them state they don't want to go back? Is that because it's an inferior layout? Are all those people fooling themselves?

      Post-hoc rationalisation. No-one likes to admit they've wasted weeks for nothing, and in more general terms people generally don't like admitting they're wrong about anything, and some will deny it until the cows come home.

      I don't type on Dvorak because it's faster. I use it because i am _lazy_.

      Then why did you bother learning it in the first place? Or were you raised in a strictly Dvorakian household?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was meant to be be nos bs.

    7. Re:Dvorak by vivtho · · Score: 1

      Question yourself - why do relative many people take effort to learn Dvorak, and a large amount of them state they don't want to go back? Is that because it's an inferior layout? Are all those people fooling themselves? Or could it be that 'qwerty is good enough too', and that a learning curve to another layout is long, and in the beginning, pretty steep?

      In this world where people believe in homeopathy, Scientology and other such crap in this world, that argument is not going to find too many takers.

    8. Re:Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was mean to be not not nos.

    9. Re:Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like what a friend of mine once said about his choice of editors: I use VI because I learned it once and it was so painful that I never want to have to learn it again. So, I stick with it even though there are much better editors for what I do.

    10. Re:Dvorak by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I learned Dvorak in college, but I ditched it after about 9 months. Sure, this was partly because it was a pain to switch keyboard layouts every time i wanted to use a different computer, and/or my friends wanted to use mine...

      Also, I did get to about 70% of the speed, and I'm sure it's just as fast, but I didn't personally feel any astounding level of simplicity to the movements. Sure, the e is in a more natural place, but I never liked the placement of 's'.

      Meh...

  13. You've got a ways to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a speedtypist as well (130-150WPM average, 160+ bursts) the issue that you will run into is that it gets incredibly hard to add the extra WPM, and last I checked your goal is above 200.

    Good luck but you generally peak out eventually.

    1. Re:You've got a ways to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Guiness record is an average 170 wpm for 50 minutes of typing, and the same person had short bursts maxing out at 212 for the English speed record. The world record in history is 216 words for 1 minute.

    2. Re:You've got a ways to go by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I'm a speedtypist as well the issue that you will run into is ... " - Parenthetical removed for clarity

      You'll run into the same issue every "speed typist" runs into, and it is the same issue exhibited by every programmer who thinks he can write code and "get it out the door" faster than I can. You'll make stupid errors that render your "great and impressive speed" pointless. See also, from the summary: "(in the typing world, five characters defines a word in the typing world, in case you were wondering)"

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  14. Three letters -- BCI by kalalau_kane · · Score: 1

    Does that typing test require use of a mechanical interface? Learn how to use a direct Brain-Compuer Interface and bypass the fingers and the keyboard. (Makes the PS2/USB argument moot.)

    1. Re:Three letters -- BCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a BCI that detects imagined words (unless you want brain surgery and only need it to decipher the difference between poop and peep).

      Any BCI used to decode movements will be much worse than actual movements since your brain is not designed to generate movements by itself. The production of accurate and precise movement requires multiple segregated parts of your brain (different cortical areas, brain stem, thalamus, basal ganglia), your spinal cord, and the feedback from your muscles and joints. One day it may be possible to record from all the required brain areas, provide direct brain stimulation as feedback, and to train the user and the BCI to operate at how ever many degrees of freedom two typing hands have, but that day is a long long ways off.

      For now and the near future, measuring the activation of a single muscle that can be controlled reliably (like your eyebrow or anus) is better for communication than any BCI that has been developed.

      (You probably weren't serious, but the less the general public expects from BCIs, the more likely my chosen profession will still exist in 10 years)

    2. Re:Three letters -- BCI by bullale · · Score: 1

      Above was me. I thought I was logged in.

  15. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear god why?

    1. Re:Why? by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Dear god why?"

      Because, for the next few years, when somebody comments on his typing speed, he can say: "The book on the shelf to your right, page 165 says I'm the fastest in the world."

      That's about it I guess.
      Unless he can write a book about the process, like people climbing a mountain other other such fruitless endeavors.

    2. Re:Why? by war4peace · · Score: 2

      People have an inherent need to be first at "something". They are competitive, and that goes back in history to... the very beginning, I'd say.
      There's a small hill near Sibiu in my country. On top of that hill there's a small church, built of stones and boulders. The hill itself is mostly made of earth, so the boulders had to be lifted there somehow. Now people wouldn't do that voluntarily so the Church somehow convinced them that in order to show how great their love is for their brides-to-be, they should pick a boulder as big as possible and carry it upwards to the top of the hill. For decades, men of all ages would do that, both to prove their love at first and then to reaffirm it as often as possible.

      A brief reference is to be found here: http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biserica_Sf%C3%A2ntul_Mihail_din_Cisn%C4%83dioara. "Exist i o legend a locului care spune c fiecare fecior înainte de nunt trebuia s duc un astfel de bolovan în cetate pentru a-i demonstra puterea." Translation: "There's a local legend saying that each bachelor should carry such a boulder, before the wedding, to the stronghold, to prove his strength". Our tour guide, however, told us more, which is what I mentioned above.

      Anyway, point is that people need to compare themselves to others and perfect a skill so that they rise above the mass. Nothing wrong with that, although some "skills" barely fit the definition. Like fastest 100m run on four limbs... seriously?

      Fast typing, however, is an useful skill. I wish I could do that, because it would greatly help channel my literary ideas faster. I sometimes write a couple pages than give up because my train of thought goes too far ahead and I get bored of putting all that in writing.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still a better plan to spend your time writing rather than trying to achieve some ridiculous goal that won't help anyone get further and only boosts your fragile ego.

    4. Re:Why? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Fastest typest really has no true advantage unless he produces real work output using it on a consistent basis far and above his peers. There is no point to having this skill if it cant be leveraged, and you will definitely see diminishing returns on a 'skill' like this when producing real work.

      --
      Good-bye
    5. Re:Why? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking this:
      I type say 5K characters a day. That's a total of 18250000 characters a year.
      If I type at the speed of 5 characters per second, just as a baseline, that's 3650000 seconds a year, almost 1014 hours spent typing every year. typing twice as fast would shave off 507 hours of focusing on typing, which I can spend on something else. I'd say it's definitely worthy.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  16. Mechanical Keyboard by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try a keyboard with mechanical switches. They're a bit noisier than the cheap ones, but I find them much faster and I make fewer typos. My fingers also get less tired. You might be able to scrape out another percent or so.

    1. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with this. The mechanical switches are heavier and more tiring. I went from 80wpm to 55wpm so I returned my DAS keyboard.

    2. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by Nerdfest · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why you disagree with me ... DAS keyboards use mechanical switches. They would be one of the first ones I'd recommend. There are gaming keyboards that are a bit cheaper, but DAS makes a well-known, reliable product.

    3. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I misread that ... I thought you said that I returned *to* my DAS keyboard.

    4. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by tsa · · Score: 1

      IMO the old MacBook Pro with the grey keys had the best keyboard ever.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      +1

      A good mechanical switch keyboard is the best thing you can do for your typing speed.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    6. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1
      I loved my old Model-M keyboard, but IBM made one that I liked even better. It was the keyboard for a block-mode terminal for an old System/34 system I used in school. The keyboard was essentially the same one used on the Selectric typewriter, and with the power off, it felt terrible. However, with the power on, a solenoid in the keyboard case would bang the case with each keystroke, simulating the effect of the typing ball in the Selectric.

      Having the physical feedback (*BANG*) made the keyboard a delight to use. Of course, it was even noisier than the Model-M (which is the chief complaint of those sitting near a happy Model-M user).

    7. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Try a keyboard with quality laptop style keys. Less travel = faster typing. They are soft and easier on the fingers, and provide plenty of bounce-back. Lenovo make some good ones, basically USB versions of their ThinkPad keyboards. Microsoft keyboards are good too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, there are different types of mechanical switches used in keyboards, and as far as I can recall, most or all of them require less force to actuate than you'd get with a typical rubber dome key switch found on most "normal" keyboards. The one generally recommended for typists is the Cherry MX Blue key switch, since it has a very easily discernible click sensation at the point of actuation (the characteristic "click" sound comes a bit later if you continue to press the key), allowing you to eventually learn how to press the key only as far as is necessary to actuate it, without wasting time and energy "bottoming out" by pressing the key all the way down. If you learn to use it properly, you can increase your typing speed significantly, since you'll no longer have to waste time bottoming out, as you've likely been trained to do from years of using rubber dome key switches.

      Gamers tend to prefer the Cherry MX Red and Black varieties, since they take less even pressure to actuate, lack the clicking sensation, and are easier to actuate repeatedly, as you might need to do in a variety of gaming contexts. If the actuation force of the DAS Keyboard was too much, you might consider looking into a keyboard with Red or Black key switches.

      There are a few other varieties as well. I have a Filco keyboard that uses Brown switches (and in which I've installed "landing pads", since I still bottom out occasionally), which fall somewhere between the Black and the Blue ones. Their click sensation is not as easily discernible, but they take less pressure to actuate and make less noise than the Blues, so they're a good middle-ground for me, since I like to do some gaming occasionally, but also type at length regularly. There are also Clear and White varieties, if memory serves, though I can't remember where they fall in the spectrums of noise, click sensation, and actuation force.

      Long story short, mechanical switches are actually easier to significantly easier to actuate than the rubber dome switches that you're likely used to, but you were probably keeping to the bad habits you learned with rubber dome switches and weren't using the mechanical keyboard as it was meant to be used. Which isn't to say you've done anything wrong. Rather, it may just mean that sticking to the familiar would be a better choice for you.

    9. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      You don't even need a mechanical keyboard — just something with a good feel. I use a ten-year-old MS Internet Keyboard Pro and it has the best feel of any membrane keyboard I've ever used, including all new MS keyboards. It's helped my touch typing immensely, and it's silent to boot.

      Go to a store and just start tapping on every keyboard they have on display. If the key feel is good, buy it. Granted, you may have to go through a few hundred SKUs or so.

    10. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by jon3k · · Score: 1

      I sprung for an 87u and it is without a doubt the best keyboard I've ever used. Topre keys are just amazing.

    11. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      It was probably a typo.

    12. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      And let's throw in a good word for the classic IBM Model M, with its buckling spring action. Now being built in the US by http://www.pckeyboard.com/, where you can also pick up spare parts or a keyboard with your own customized layout. I own several vintage Ms, hate to use anything else. (BTW, their pricing is quite reasonable - around $80 and up).

    13. Re:Mechanical Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, until they break. sadly enough my up arrow went first -- thanks bash!

  17. My 1.3 Cents worth... by ReadAholic · · Score: 1

    As a typing amateur I offer this advice:
    Don't Do It.
    It's too Hard.
    You will Fail.
    You Can't do it.

    As somebody who doesn't like those kind of comments I offer This Advice:
    Go For It!!
    Kick Your Boundaries in the Nads!!
    Practice! Practice! Practice!
    And ENJOY THE ATTEMPT!!!!

    1. Re:My 1.3 Cents worth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.gnu.org/software/gtypist/

  18. AC? by macbeth66 · · Score: 0

    Bugger off.

  19. Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much time did it take anonymous reader to write his post on /. ?

  20. A long time to maybe never. by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_curve
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_curve_effects

    Gaining a little bit if typing speed is easy, it's the ever increasing difficultly of getting faster and faster that can stretch training out for years.

    1. Re:A long time to maybe never. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Gaining a little bit if typing speed is easy"

      ... and gaining a little bit less if it's difficult?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  21. Current Records by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to Wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute

    The fastest typing speed ever, 216 words in one minute, was achieved by Stella Pajunas in 1946 on an IBM electric.[6][7][8][9] As of 2005, writer Barbara Blackburn was the fastest English language typist in the world, according to The Guinness Book of World Records. Using the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, she has maintained 150 wpm for 50 minutes, and 170 wpm for shorter periods. She has been clocked at a peak speed of 212 wpm.

    One of the most notable online records considered genuine is 256 wpm (a record caught on video) on TypeRacer by American Sean Wrona, the inaugural Ultimate Typing Championship winner, which is considered the highest legitimate score ever set on the site.

    1. Re:Current Records by sco08y · · Score: 0

      According to Wikipedia:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute

      The fastest typing speed ever, 216 words in one minute, was achieved by Stella Pajunas in 1946 on an IBM electric.[6][7][8][9] As of 2005, writer Barbara Blackburn was the fastest English language typist in the world, according to The Guinness Book of World Records. Using the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, she has maintained 150 wpm for 50 minutes, and 170 wpm for shorter periods. She has been clocked at a peak speed of 212 wpm.

      One of the most notable online records considered genuine is 256 wpm (a record caught on video) on TypeRacer by American Sean Wrona, the inaugural Ultimate Typing Championship winner, which is considered the highest legitimate score ever set on the site.

      Hey, the guy wants to be the world's best secretary. He said nothing about being any good at using a search engine.

    2. Re:Current Records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Caught on video"? Well, take a look on YouTube at the video of Sean Wrona's test. It shows text appearing in a browser window - not someone bashing keys with fingers. That would be trivially easy to fake with anyone who has a modicum of programming experience and a copy of the Firefox source code. I'm not saying that Sean faked it - but we have no proof that any of those typeracer "records" are genuine.

      Need video of fingers on keyboard...but even that could be faked these days.

      This is why we need the Guiness book of records - they send trustworth people out with stopwatches to verify these kinds of claim.

    3. Re:Current Records by jittles · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute

      The fastest typing speed ever, 216 words in one minute, was achieved by Stella Pajunas in 1946 on an IBM electric.[6][7][8][9] As of 2005, writer Barbara Blackburn was the fastest English language typist in the world, according to The Guinness Book of World Records. Using the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, she has maintained 150 wpm for 50 minutes, and 170 wpm for shorter periods. She has been clocked at a peak speed of 212 wpm.

      One of the most notable online records considered genuine is 256 wpm (a record caught on video) on TypeRacer by American Sean Wrona, the inaugural Ultimate Typing Championship winner, which is considered the highest legitimate score ever set on the site.

      I guess I should go for the record then. The last time I took a typing class was in college. My car broke down, I had no way to get to school, so I had to drop 9 units of classes that were during a time of the day where I couldn't bum a ride from friends/family. I went below full time, and had to maintain full-time status so I took some typing classes, intro to word and excel, and other one-unit self paced classes at the library. If the software they used calculated the data right, I averaged over 150WPM with alphanumeric sentences and could burst up to ~260WPM on alphabet characters only. Of course its much easier to read something off the screen and type it off as you read it than to sit here and think about a response and type it. I got through college partially by doing legal transcription work for a law office. I went through a 6 month backlog of tapes in less than a month of 12 hour weeks. I wish I could do everything as well as I can type!

    4. Re:Current Records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secretary work is a pretty poor example of extreme typing speed. There is a very real limit to how fast we can see something, process it, and enact the typing motions to reproduce it. When I'm copying text, I generally can't get much faster than 90 WPM, but when I'm writing something that coming out of a well developed thought I've clocked myself at 160 WPM. However I know for certain I've typed faster than that, just not in the habit of measuring my type rate 24/7, for me it's more of a once in awhile to see if I've improved since my last measure.

      The key really is to have a well developed thought of what you will be typing. Don't take for granted that you'll figure out spelling and grammar on the fly, think about such things ahead of time. It's all too easy to get ahead of yourself either in typing or thought when you get into the extreme typing speeds required to beat the guiness record. The one thing that'll probably be best approach there is to rely on muscle memory until you can hit the speeds you want, then shift over to improvisation gradually.

    5. Re:Current Records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be trivially easy to fake with anyone who has a modicum of programming experience

      It'd be trivially easy for anyone, actually. Just find a program or script that does what you want...

    6. Re:Current Records by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I see the 1 minute record is pretty much unbelievable, but the 5 minute record is attainable. PC based records were considered suspect by us old farts from the typewriter days, since the buffer and all that software got in the way of accurate recording. We would want to see a specially made keyboard without buffer, able to reliabley send 300+ wpm, and then software to record that. Which requires a whole different way of testing.

      My mom could type 90+ steadily on an Olympia SG3, and older competitions usually were dominated by standard (manual) typewriters. Electric typewriters are limited by the speed of either accelerating the typebar, or in the case of Selectrics, limited by the mechanism of cycle clutch and compensator. Selectrics have maximum speeds that cannot be overcome without changing the motor RPM, and there is probably an absolute maximum determined by the compensator and time to clear the selectors. Electric typewriters can only accelrate the typebars so fast, and most moder typewriters improve speed with a spring to throw the typebar back. for the purposes of typing speed, electronic typewriters are equivalent to PC keyboards in most cases. Some electronics have terrible printing mechanisms, and don't qualify.

      I, for one, would love to mod a Displaywriter keyboard for speed tests. I think it's the best keyboard ever, surpassing the Selectric. Selectric keyboards introduced the pronounced curvature of the keyboard, equalizing the distance betweek the home row and top/bottom rows for comfort. this is lost with virtually every keyboard I've used on a PC except the IBM Model M, and some variants. I guess Unicomp stil makes them, no IBM logo though. Typing on today's short-throw keyboards means you're essentially pounding your fingers on a plastic board. I have the callouses to prove it. I had a true spacesaver M (no num pad) that was a pleasyre to use, but like all ofthem the cable finally went obsolete. I should have kept it and used adapters. arg.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:Current Records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story, bro.

    8. Re:Current Records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I thought for sure that Mavis Beacon would own the record.

  22. Is it hard to do a google check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As of 2005, Barbara Blackburn, of Salem, Oregon, is the fastest English language typist in the world, according to The Guinness Book of World Records. Using the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, she has maintained 150 words per minute for 50 min, 170 words per minute for shorter periods and has been clocked at a peak speed of 212 words per minute.

    One of the most notable online records considered genuine is 256 wpm (a record caught on video) on TypeRacer by American Sean Wrona, the inaugural Ultimate Typing Championship winner, which is considered the highest legitimate score ever set on the site

  23. Stenotype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not sure if stenotype counts. Probably not, because otherwise the record would be much higher than 180wpm continuous. This form of typing is typically used by court reporters and closed captioners, who regularly achieve 250wpm. Plover is an open-source tool you can use to steno-ify your keyboard. (Disclaimer: I've never used it, so I don't know how well it works.) You'd want a keyboard with full n-key rollover (NKRO), since steno involves "chording" keys, i.e. hitting many at once to achieve a desired effect. Many gaming mechanical keyboards are NKRO.

    If you aren't interested in stenotype, you can also look at the Colemak keyboard layout, which has been gaining steam more recently, and purports to be better than Dvorak and QWERTY. That said, I think the current world record holder (outside of steno) is a QWERTY typist.

    1. Re:Stenotype by Qwertie · · Score: 1

      While Dvorak is better than Qwerty, it is not the optimal keyboard layout (e.g. R is a common letter but is not on home row) and Colemak is easier to learn for those that already use Qwerty. I tried learning Dvorak and it was fairly frustrating (it didn't help that punctuation and common keyboard shortcuts like Ctrl+X/C/V had moved); you'll learn Colemak faster because it has some similarity to Qwerty. Asset is even more similar to Qwerty, but it isn't designed to be quite as fast so you probably shouldn't choose it for a world record attempt.

      Of course, switching to any other layout will "reset" your speed to almost zero at first, and it could take quite a long time to reach the same speed you had with Qwerty.

    2. Re:Stenotype by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure anyone has come up with the optimal keyboard layout for typing English, which I interpret to be the least amount of effort to type the most common words.

      I did a quick comparison of QWERTY, Dvorak and Colemak on the finger movements required to type the most common trigraphs in English, which are: THE, AND, THA, ENT, ION, TIO, FOR, NDE, HAS, NCE, TIS, OFT, MEN, ING, EDT, STH. I threw in STR since that one is a very common consonant cluster.

      The result: on QWERTY, you have to reach off the home keys 39 times and use the same finger more than once in typing 7 of the trigraphs.

      For Dvorak, it was 13 reaches off the home keys, and no repeat finger usage.

      For Colemak, it was 12 reaches off the home row, and 2 trigraphs that required using a finger repeatedly.

      I see the value in increasing alternating hand usage to increase speed, but there is also something to be gained from having common trigraphs clustered so you can hit them in a rolling motion with your index, middle, and ring fingers.

      For example, S-D-F and F-D-S, J-K-L and L-K-J are quick to type on QWERTY but rarely appear in English. Those prime key locations should probably belong to S-T-R and I-O-N.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  24. First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do YOU want a Guiness Word Record, and why?

    I mean, you've already demonstrated this ability to your family, friends and peers. Do YOU really want a go at "being the fastest / strongest / wittiest", etc., a record that is SURE to be broken by someone else some day anyways?

    If you REALLY want this, I'm not sure why you ask on /. You then definately will grow ideas on your own. Probably being faster than anyone else on this site, you'd probably only be hampered by bad advice from would-be armchair record holders.

  25. Play Starcraft 2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that will help increase your clicks-per-minute.

  26. Confusious Say;... by flyneye · · Score: 4, Insightful

    - Practice, Practice, Practice- --10,000,000 anonymous piano teachers
    - See the ball, be the ball- --Chevy Chase in "Caddyshack"
    - Use the force, Luke- --Obiwan Kenobi in , you know, that one show...
    - Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be- --Johnny Cash-- "Cocaine Blues"
    What can I say, go for the record.
    I had a friend, of simple mind and scheming disposition, who in his drifting sought donations to fund his time and sojourn to Ireland to demonstrate for Guinness his ability to bicycle backwards continually. For months he drifted around the country putting on exhibitions and demonstrations of his talent amassing quite a warchest. He traveled to Ireland, pretty much free of charge and being free of responsibility for months in pursuit of his dream. He did then bicycle around the Guinness buildings for 24 hours and change , setting the record. The next week a local Irish held the record. There are no losers in this story. Cheers and Happy Holidays!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  27. I think you're asking the wrong crowd by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand why you asked for advice, but I think your reasoning is flawed (ie. your assumption that Slashdotters would know technical stuff about typing). As an IT worker who can type at a good (for an IT guy) rate, my observation is that I am lots faster than most IT people and I am not even close to being fast enough to do secretarial work. Most IT people are terrible at typing. It's not that uncommon to find 2 finger typists in IT. Since a lot of Slashdotters are IT geeks, you're asking the wrong folks to begin with. I'm sure we'll get a few people to post who are the exception to the rule, but again, they are the exceptions.

    Dvorak has its detractors and fans. You'll likely get some who swear that only by using it can you achieve your goal and they will possibly cite some studies to back this up. Then others will cite their own studies that show that QWERTY is even faster than Dvorak. I've seen QWERTY vs. Dvorak religious wars here and I doubt that you'll come away convinced of anything.

    1. Re:I think you're asking the wrong crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've seen QWERTY vs. Dvorak religious wars here and I doubt that you'll come away convinced of anything."

      Nonsense. I'm convinced of one thing. Such battles make emacs versus vi seem like a minor technical disagreement.

    2. Re:I think you're asking the wrong crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen anyone claim QWERTY to be faster, just that it isn't slower.

    3. Re:I think you're asking the wrong crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's IT. programmers can frequently notch out more, and DBAs even more (something about the verbosity of SQL). data entry folks can put up some scary numbers if the corpus is consistent enough for them to ramp up.

      none of them have a chance against (traditional) secretaries -- typing transcription is about as demanding of a typing exercise as could be designed.

  28. Look up the record by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 1

    You could have bothered to look up the current record which is at 256 words per minute. There are several documented cases of people typing over 200 wpm. An average over 150 wpm is nice but it's not going to get you the record.

    1. Re:Look up the record by jspoon · · Score: 2

      Also, the high score is clearly stored in a single byte so you'll just roll over if you break 256.

    2. Re:Look up the record by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      That would be funny if the range of an unsigned 8-bit integer wasn't [0, 255] ...

    3. Re:Look up the record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe typing at 0 is not a valid typing speed, so it'd be offset by one. :)

    4. Re:Look up the record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's using a [1,256] encoding, duh.

    5. Re:Look up the record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never seen me type.

    6. Re:Look up the record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be funny if the range of an unsigned 8-bit integer wasn't [0, 255] ...

      That'd be relevant if the bit pattern 0x00 could not possibly be interpreted as, say, 1.

    7. Re:Look up the record by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      That'd be relevant if the bit pattern 0x00 could not possibly be interpreted as, say, 1.

      It could, but no sane cpu or programming language would.

  29. Equivalent task? by paiute · · Score: 2

    Find someone who plays the clarinet and ask them how they mastered Flight of the Bumblebee?

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Equivalent task? by michael_cain · · Score: 1

      Just a nit, but clarinet is more like chording input -- multiple fingers change position at once. I assume that any sort of chording keyboard that recognizes particular combinations as entire words is illegal for typing competitions. Basic certification as a stenotype operator requires that you be able to do on the order of 180 words per minute. There's considerable dispute about the world record for stenotypes, but it's clearly in the 350-375 words per minute range, much higher than the record for character-at-a-time typists.

    2. Re:Equivalent task? by paiute · · Score: 1

      Just a nit, but clarinet is more like chording input -- multiple fingers change position at once.

      How about the piano? Seems like the right hand part anyway is lots of individual notes.

      OP should also look into finger-cooling technology.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    3. Re:Equivalent task? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all Equivalent,

      Flight of the Bumblebee or any other fast solo is something that is mastered through muscle memory and repetition. I am a clarinet player and I can play many such solos without thinking at all by just letting my fingers go. This only works because I must play the exact same thing every time and have practiced that exact thing for hours. Typing is much more akin to sight reading where one must play something they have never seen before. Then again, I am sure that muscle memory does work for typing single words, so maybe there is some connection between the two.

  30. Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm awesome. I want to show others how awesome I am. I don't know how to do that yet, so I'm asking you to behold my awsomeness and tell me how to be more awesome. Are you in awe? You should be, now answer my question on how to increase my awesome.

    Love,
    Awesome Ego Driven douche

  31. Learn Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it is most definitely worth it. If you start typing in Dvorak only, you can master it in just a week or two. It's a small price to save you a lot of aching digits when you type at world-record speeds.

  32. don't change.. by plebeian · · Score: 1

    If you can type that fast on a normal Querty keyboard, I would not try anything else. Retraining the muscle memory may really mess with your speed. That being said, I once switched to a Kinesis Advantage keyboard to help with tendinitis, and saw my typing speed increase after a couple weeks. Note: I am not a speed typist just a systems administrator who types on average 50 wpm, but was averaging closer to 70 on the Advantage...

    --
    "I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."
  33. you probably think this post is about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This question is really vain and self-serving. Next, please.

  34. Das Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will love it!

  35. Just wondering... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    When attempting a typing record nowadays, do they deduct all the words underlined with red squigglies from your total?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  36. Mechanical Keyboard by SilentOneNCW · · Score: 1

    Get a decent mechanical keyboard if you want to go for the record - probably a Filco Majestouch 2 with Cherry MX Blue switches, although you could also go for a Topre Realforce if you wanted something a bit quieter and lighter.

  37. Hope this is useful... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    I type for a living on a voice recognition system that handles medical reports for a large university hospital in a major metropolitan area in the Southeastern US. I can achieve an effective rate of 300-400 69-character lines per hour using a word expander program called Shortcut for Windows while editing voice recognized text. If our physicians are well scripted in their dictation, using the same phrases and format as usual, I can easily double that as I learn where the VR usually fails, move to those spots quickly, make necessary changes, then quickly verify the reports matches the audio with a listen in high-speed playback.
    Some of our reports are typed in toto and I can average about 250-280 lines per hour if I use word expansion macros, usually 3-5 character mnemonic abbreviations that expand into difficult to type words, often used phrases, and even whole pages of boilerplate when necessary.
    I do fairly well, but the transcription industry has been whittled away by substandard work delivered by overseas workers who are willing to work for half of what we used to make, and all the good shops are being bought up by big transcription businesses that love to ship work to overseas employees, if they can get away with it.

  38. Two things. . . by DancesWithRobots · · Score: 1

    First--A woman I met in an unemployment line, got a job because she changed her email address to "200wpm@whatever.com" (an honest assessment of her abilities, she claimed.) Second, as for dvorak--I type dvorak. I can't say it's increased my speed, but it DID lessen my RSI. That being said. . .since my company doesn't use a client/server network with wandering profiles--my computer annoys everyone who sits down at it. Which. . .I feel is a good thing.

  39. IT people as bad typists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing a lot of this in this thread and think that to be a IT person being self-admitted bad typist is a bad combination. IT people don't need to be super typist but they should type reasonably fast and should be better at typing numbers, brackets, braces, and other less commonly used characters. An IT person who does the hunt-and-peck is handicapped in my opinion.

  40. It's a large wall to scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can type at speeds nearly identical to yours, around 170-180 for 1 minute bursts and ~150 for spans of multiple minutes(but not for 50 minutes). I don't feel I would have any shot at these records. I've also met other people who could type at the same speed, and none of them were contemplating making a run at the world record. Additionally there are speeds listed at 296 wpm considered genuine on wikipedia(for 5 character words). I assume this is for the same length of time that I'm managing 180 wpm. The difference between 180 and 290 is huge, especially considering I was already spending quite a lot of time typing when my speed was measured and I couldn't imagine ever increasing my speed to that. If you are typing at 150-160 wpm, but don't spend all that much time typing, I'd suspect it might be worth trying to make a run at the record. If you spend a great deal of time typing on the other hand(like me), it's likely to be an insurmountable task to reach the record.

    The record by miss Blackburn was also set on a typewriter.

  41. Cherry Blue keyboard by dotancohen · · Score: 2

    If you want speed, the Cherry Blue keyboard switch is ideal. It requires only 55 grams of force to depress (compared to 70-90 grams for a buckling spring) and has a loud click and tactile feedback for when the keypress is detected. You don't need to bottom out the keys, though you can do so if you are used to it. The Blues are a bit loud if you are working near other people, but they are the perfect high-speed typing switch.

    You have a high speed in QWERTY I presume, not DVORAK. I therefore recommend that you practice QWERTY for the record. You may have an innate ability to type fast, but you will be throwing away years of practice if you start with a new layout. Also, you will find yourself prone to errors on uncommon words when your muscle memory defaults to QWERTY on slightly-confusing words.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    1. Re:Cherry Blue keyboard by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      Reds only require 45g. They are the lightest switch.

    2. Re:Cherry Blue keyboard by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I'm typing on Reds now. They are the lightest Cherry switch, but they have no feedback.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Cherry Blue keyboard by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      Browns are pretty much the same as Red but with the tactile feedback. The thing is you are going to be bottoming out the key either way so the feedback is pretty much does not provide much value. The feedback mechanism also causes a pressure spike so it won't be 45g all the way to the bottom. (You can find detailed images of the pressure of each switch type if you do a web search) And the feedback makes it noisier which can be an annoyance.

  42. 1000 cpm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 1000 cpm (200 wpm) already broke using Iambic morse paddle (using 1 iambic paddle). Maybe you should use the paddle (or even 2, left and right) so you don't have to move around the keyboard to find the right character.
    http://www.rufzxp.net/speed1000.htm

  43. Don't start over with new layout by tverbeek · · Score: 2

    Regardless of the relative merits of Dvorak vs. Qwerty, there's absolutely no benefit in this situation in throwing out however-many years of muscle memory on one layout (which is absolutely critical to speed-typing), to start over learning a different layout.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  44. hand lotion... by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    make sure you lube those fingers up real good just before you get started

  45. The Speed Racer effect hampers documents... by DontScotty · · Score: 1, Funny

    "(in the typing world, five characters defines a word in the typing world, in case you were wondering)."

    If you are in the typing world,
    and you want to communicate
    something in the typing wold,
    and you can avoid repeating
    items in the typing world,
    you would have less time spent
    typing about things in the typing world,
    and then you would go through documents
    really fast as you type then in the typing world.

    GO SPEED RACER, GO!

  46. Typing too fast... by ildon · · Score: 2

    Can cause errors like this:

    (in the typing world, five characters defines a word in the typing world, in case you were wondering)

  47. You need someone to do analysis... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    ... on what are the main factors that drive your typing speed. I'd go find some smart people / physicists and get some data to figure out where you are weak (in typing) first and what possible avenues you could take.

  48. Re:Hello? Editors? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

    It might be redundant but he/she typed the sentence really fast.

  49. FWIW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1933, Dvorak started entering typists trained on his keyboard into the International Commercial Schools Contest, which were typing contests sponsored by typewriter manufacturers consisting of professional and amateur contests. The professional contests had typists sponsored by typewriter companies to advertise their machines. Ten times from 1934–41, Dvorak's typists won first in their class events. In the 1935 contest alone, nine Dvorak typists won twenty awards. Dvorak typists were so successful that in 1937 the Contest Committee barred Dvorak's typists for being "unfair competition" until Dvorak protested. In addition, QWERTY typists did not want to be placed near Dvorak typists because QWERTY typists were disconcerted by the noise produced from the fast typing speeds made by Dvorak typists.

    Emphasis added. Robert Parkinson. "The Dvorak Simplified Keyboard: Forty Years of Frustration". Retrieved 2010-04-26.

    via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard

    Maybe consider Dvorak?

    1. Re:FWIW by eneville · · Score: 0

      I started to use the Dvorak layout but it hindered me once I tried to edit a file in vi and started pressing the wrong buttons, hjlk and :wq etc were all in the wrong place. My brain would think "up!" but instead all I pressed was garbage.

  50. Re:Hello? Editors? by froggymana · · Score: 1

    in the typing world, five characters defines a word in the typing world, in case you were wondering

    Redundant much?

    Why do you think he needs to type so fast?

    --
    "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  51. my strategy by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Play lots and lots of video games. You'll type really quickly if your teammate is about to screw up a raid. I seriously type around 98WPM and it's 100% by letting my fingers do the logic subconsciously, crossing over all the time, and generally breaking every proper rule of typing and just doing it my way. Considering everyone doing it 1 way hasn't broken the record, doing it differently might. You know how at the Olympics, every 16 years or so someone invents a new way of doing the sport because they didn't want to beat everyone a their own game and blows everyone away and the next time everyone is doing it? Case in point.
    Also, use a low press weight keyboard. It speeds you up more than you think. Also, lots and lots of caffeine.

    1. Re:my strategy by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

      uh...off-topic, I know, but seriously...you type in a raid? Ever hear of Ventrilo?

    2. Re:my strategy by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Dunno if you're 14 or what but back in the day, no games supported voice chat and nobody used Vent. That's when I learned to type.

  52. Re:Hello? Editors? by uncqual · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, but if you read it really fast you don' t notice the redundancy. Think of it as ECC or parity.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  53. maybe dvorak by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    I personally use the dvorak layout and love it, and I think it's certainly much easier to use and far lower stress. However, aside from individual cases, every study I'm aware of has concluded that dvorak doesn't actually improve to typing speeds. So while I personally think you should try it anyway, it might not help with this particular goal.

  54. Somebody call Jae-Dong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does Jae-Dong's 400 actions per minute (APM) in Starcraft Brood War translate into words per minute? What about Starcraft II?

  55. Um Yeah by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Our first response is usually obscenity laden and we realize before hitting send that if we send it, we're going to be paid a visit from HR. Again. So we have to clear out the line and start over. Then we realize that saying someone doesn't actually know how to do their job will still cause that visit from HR. You're lucky if it's just two minutes, sometimes it takes half an hour to craft a diplomatic response with just the right level of passive aggression. "Oh look, SOMEONE killed the database server. Again."

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Um Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      sometimes it takes half an hour to craft a diplomatic response with just the right level of passive aggression. "Oh look, SOMEONE killed the database server. Again."

      By the way, if a user is really killing the DB server and is not doing it by physically disconnecting stuff (network, power), or intentionally doing a DoS then that's not really the user's fault. The fault lies elsewhere. If so I don't see why you should consider taking it out on the user. It's unprofessional and immature.

      I have had to fix flaky buggy stuff, and if the users encounter bugs it's not their fault. It may not be my fault either (inherited crap code) but it's my responsibility to fix it.

      If I really don't like it, I could quit and then the crap is no longer my responsibility. But till then, that's what I'm paid to do. Maybe there are jobs with less crappy code, but on the bright side my own crappy code looks like shining jewels in all that shit... Whereas if I worked elsewhere my code might look like shit next to the jewels. So maybe I just need to find a job with a matching level of code crappiness ;).

  56. I switched to Dvorak this year by Andrio · · Score: 2

    Around the end of January I made the leap into Dvorak, rewriting some 15 years of muscle memory. I still feel I'm in the process of learning it, despite having gotten back some 95% keyboard typing effectiveness. Some notes:

    1. Your right pinkie is underdeveloped. With qwerty, your right pinkie doesn't do nearly as much typing as the rest of the fingers. Under Dvorak, it's new responsibilities will include 'S', one of the most used letters in the alphabet. In addition, 'L', question marks, 'Z', hyphens, and others. You will notice that your right pinkie being a bit of a bottleneck at first.

    2. You'll be somewhat "dyslexic" when typing, as you learn Dvorak. I think this because each half of the brain have gotten used to always being in charge of a letter. The right side always handled 'S' for example, but now the left side will handle it. That's just one example, but you'll find yourself making weird typos until your brain gets used to the new layout.

    3. Keyboard shortcuts will require some work. Things like Ctrl C, Ctrl V, etc are now undoable with your right hand. This was unacceptable to me, so I downloaded a custom keyboard layout called "US - Dvorak - QWERTY" that basically makes it so that when you hold down Ctrl, the keyboard is mapped as QWERTY again. This works pretty good 99% of the time. But keep in mind Windows doesn't have this built in.

    4. The social aspect. One of the biggest 'challenges' to the new layout is the social aspect. People won't be able to just jump on your machine and start typing, and you won't be able to get anyone else's computer and type without looking at the keyboard, making typos, etc. If they don't know about your alternate keyboard, they may make the assumption that you don't know how to type, which can be a bit embarrassing. In addition, I hear growls from my wife when she starts typing on my computer, and realizes she needed to switch back to qwerty (which, thankfully, can easily be done from the taskbar with the language toolbar)

    So, was the switch worth it? Yes. I'm still learning, but when I see others type, it almost looks ridiculous how their fingers are going crazy on the keyboard, smacking almost randomly. Whereas when I type, 70% of everything I write is done without my fingers ever leaving the home row :) This best illustrates what I mean:

    "It has been estimated that in an average eight-hour day, a typist's hands travel 16 miles on a QWERTY keyboard, but only 1 mile on a Dvorak keyboard."

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:I switched to Dvorak this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, you've been typing with Dvorak for one year and the overall result is that your effectiveness has gone down by 5%. But you are still sure that it was worth it because of the way it looks when other people type.

      Not exactly a ringing endorsement.

    2. Re:I switched to Dvorak this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your right pinkie doesn't do nearly as much typing as the rest of the fingers. Under Dvorak, it's new responsibilities will include 'S

      Are you sure about that? :-)

    3. Re:I switched to Dvorak this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to use DVORAK, but the lack of HW + SW support for it made things a bit hard, i eventually dropped it as there was sometimes guesswork involved with shortcuts etc. minor issues, the biggest was lack of proper keyboard with dvorak mapping so i'd actually know where everything is apart from the usual keys.

      I went back to QWERTY and DVORAK back then with no issues what-so-ever, basic typing with DVORAK was faster after just couple of month for me, but then again, i've always been quite fast in typing, not fast enough tho when coding i often find my fingers being behind my thoughts up to several minutes >_

    4. Re:I switched to Dvorak this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go under Language & Inputs you can bind a shortcut to switch between Dvorak and QWERTY so you don't even have to pull up the language bar in the future. I use ctrl + shift + 1 and ctrl + shift + 2 respectively, to make it easy for people (Like my wife) to switch my machine if she needs access.

      I also, unfortunately, haven't found any real speed gains. I feel like it's a little more comfortable to type with the different layout (I can still touch type QWERTY now that I know Dvorak, though I had to relearn it from scratch again because I only had it in muscle memory before) but nothing spectacular efficiency wise.

    5. Re:I switched to Dvorak this year by Sirfrummel · · Score: 1

      Very interesting! I've been typing DVORAK for about 5 years now.

      It took me a long time to get back up to my old QWERTY speed (about 80 WPM) -- at least two or three years, so during that time I was around 45-50 WPM in both. What sucked for me learning DVORAK was that afterwards, I had to go back and 're-familiarize' myself with QWERTY.

      You can set a shortcut in Windows to switch keyboard layouts, I usually set Ctrl+Shift. I also usually set Windows to be set per-application for layout, as some applications are completely geared towards the QWERTY layout (Photoshop).

  57. Re:Hello? Editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the typing world, five characters defines a word in the typing world, in case you were wondering

    Redundant much?

    I wonder which five? Surely Webster would have been one.

  58. Stella Pajunas in 2005 was fastest, at 216 wpm .. by tkjtkj · · Score: 1

    ""The fastest typing speed ever, 216 words in one minute, was achieved by Stella Pajunas in 1946 on an IBM electric.[6][7][8][9] As of 2005, writer Barbara Blackburn was the fastest English language typist in the world, according to The Guinness Book of World Records. Using the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, she has maintained 150 wpm for 50 minutes, and 170 wpm for shorter periods. She has been clocked at a peak speed of 212 wpm. Blackburn, who failed her QWERTY typing class in high school, first encountered the Dvorak keyboard in 1938, quickly learned to achieve very high speeds, and occasionally toured giving speed-typing demonstrations during her secretarial career. She appeared on The David Letterman Show and felt that Letterman made a spectacle of her.[10]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute

    --
    "There are 11 kinds of people: those who know binary, those who don't, and those who could not care less!"
  59. I'm pretty sure that's not a record by mark-t · · Score: 1

    In the late 1980's, I had occasion to meet a young woman who apparently had a typing speed of just under 180 words per minute. She had won several regional competitions on account of her skill (I imagine largely attributed to her youth... she was not even 20 years old at the time), but she did not hold the title of international record holder.

    (To be frank, I don't even know if she or anybody else even bothered to check if she was a record holder or not. All she had ever told me in that regard is that she had won a few typing competitions, but the subject of actually holding a world record never came up.)

    I remember it was so weird watching her type on a computer, it was more like watching a 300 or so bps modem spewing text than it was watching somebody actually type stuff.

    Google seems to indicate that the current world record typing speed is 212 wpm.

  60. use voice recognition by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then learn how to speed talk and use voice to text. You'll never type as fast as that.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute#Speech_and_listening

    1. Re:use voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could work...

      Just as long as you don't go to Mr Mackey school of speech therapy.. M'Kay.

  61. I can also do 130+ wpm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't realize it was superhuman or anything though.

  62. Good advice by tsa · · Score: 1

    Type as fast as you can!

    --

    -- Cheers!

  63. DVORAK! by dynamo · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is worth learning Dvorak just for such an attempt - but you will not be faster with it for at least a couple of weeks. It's worth learning Dvorak for many other reasons too - one of the most important being minimizing long-term wear and tear on your hands, which gets to be absolutely crippling at times if you aren't careful.

    1. Re:DVORAK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is your evidence?

      Sean Wrona, who sustained 174 wpm for 50 minutes, uses a QWERTY keyboard. I can't prove whether Stella Pajunas used a QWERTY or Dvorak keyboard, but I think it's overwhelmingly likely to have been QWERTY. On the other hand, Barbara Blackburn used a Dvorak keyboard.

      As a result, I doubt it makes a difference.

  64. the record on a Royal manual is 240+ wpm by swschrad · · Score: 1

    now, you can probably type as fast as lightning if the judges don't have to read your opus. writing is easy. reading is hard.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  65. "only 1 mile on a Dvorak keyboard"... by swschrad · · Score: 1

    yeah, you have to keep looking to see where the keys are

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  66. David Letterman by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    There was an epsiode of Late Night with David Letterman back in the 1980's where they invited the world's fastest typist for a demonstration of her skills. Having gotten their hands on her typewriter before the show, they detached the metal ball with all the typefaces on it and reattached it in the wrong orientation. All her typing came out as complete jibberish. I still laugh when I think about that gag.

    1. Re:David Letterman by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      Presumably, the typist didn't even notice the gag until after she finished typing. Not having to look at the output (or the keyboard) is a major advantage of touch typing, as opposed to hunting-and-pecking, no matter how fast one can hunt and peck.

  67. Learn Machine Shorthand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the fastest way to go from audio to text:
    http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-3000/fastest-realtime-court-reporter-(stenotype-writing)/

  68. Why so slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    200 words a minute is nothing, I can type 400 words a minute and will prove it.

    "400 words a minute"

    Easy as pie.

  69. typrx racing site by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

    There's a neat web-based type racing site at www.typrx.com, which allows a person to measure their word-per-minute score either by themselves or against strangers or (in the case of "private" races) friends. The current top score on that site is a bit over 200 words per minute.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  70. Re:Hello? Editors? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department. Looks right to me!

  71. Z-Type by kwoff · · Score: 2

    I recommend playing Z-Type all the time... :P But maybe I'm not a good one to take advice from:

    Level 25 (?)
    Final Score: 002651
    Accuracy: 94.5%
    Words Per Minute: 46.5

    (Of course, you can't really judge your WPM from that (spend time waiting for new "targets"), but it's an interesting concept.)

  72. dvorak by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    I use the "truly ergonomic" keyboard, blank, clicky, and dvorak. Obviously I'm no where near 150wpm -- really if I could program that fast, I'd be done my day in twenty minutes. I probably average 3wpm, but programming's more thinking than typing. Anyway...

    At your speeds, dvorak isn't a speed boost. But it will give you something important. Assuming you're typing in english, you'll have fewer and shorter finger movements. So you'll have increased stamina, especially if the record requires you to train a lot to reach.

    This particular keyboard's key layout is a better shape. It's columnar -- vertically the keys are aligned -- but waved horizontally to match your fingers. I find it much faster than typical layouts because I can slide from one key to the next much better -- and they are full proper keys.

    Obviously, being noisy and having proper tactile feedback, it's far faster. But I'd suspect that you don't wait for feedback of any kind at your speeds. But if you do, it's a great thing to have.

    The force fall-off is phenominal, and this keyboard or another, that should be your most prized feature. That, and a large buffer. I'd hate to think of your being limited just because you've exhausted the keyboard buffer.

    As far as actually transitioning from qwerty to dvorak, it's an annoying two weeks, but that's it. It's easy, it's simple, and you'll be stunned at how many words are typed without leaving the home row. Then you'll be shocked to realize how few words require the bottom row at all.

  73. Full sentences on IRC by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    Use IRC a lot, and always type in full, grammatically correct sentences with correct punctuation. This alone got me from 55wpm to 90wpm.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  74. workout with a metronome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing playing saxophone for years has taught me if you want speed, you have to use a metronome.
    Start out on slower setting than you are used to, and move the tempo up 2 bpm's every 2 minutes.
    You will be amazed at the results this brings.

  75. Re:Hello? Editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's typing so fast that 'in the typing world' appears to be in two places at once.

  76. Re:half an hour to get back into the groove by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Not all functions have that luxury. "Half an hour to get back in the groove" can be seen as "wasting time". In the place I worked, emails meant that you had a little bit of time to answer it, IM's meant that every minute you burned answering it was some one else's minute they couldn't do their job, so you were the one on the "timer". And no, you could maybe squeak 7 minutes to "get back in the groove" before something else popped up.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  77. Do it soon by dave562 · · Score: 1

    I used to have 100+wpm typing abilities, in my late teens and early twenties. My speed has remained roughly the same, but my accuracy has been slipping lately (I'm turning 35 this year). If you are going to go for the record, just do it. Do not wait.

  78. PS/2 of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the correct question is which one can process faster typing and n key releases. the answer is ps/2.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/mechanical-switch-keyboard,2955-5.html

  79. suggestion by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    i would suggest getting a life.

    i guess you're proud of having impressed some fifth-graders with your amazing super-power but, really, it's a pretty lame claim to fame.

    fame is over-rated, and the desire for fame just marks you out to be a wanker - and a desperate one to be striving for such a trivial "achievement".

  80. A Mechanical Keyboard and Colemak layout by Burz · · Score: 1

    The two changes together have made it much, much easier for me to type. And at very fast typing speeds, the 13% reduction in effort over Dvorak is nothing to sneeze at.

    Keep in mind that for a layout like Colemak to be a real benefit you have to be a good touch typist. OTOH if you are using some kind of personally-adapted hunt and peck method like Sean Wrona then it won't make as big of a difference. There is some good discussion of typing speed and comfort at the colemak.com forum.

    Speaking of Wrona, he sometimes participates in tournaments both online and in person. I've heard that typing is taken pretty seriously as a sport in some other non-US countries.

    Some of the better keyboards available now are the Matias QuietPro (tactile but quiet), the Topre Realforce (uses capacitive springs), the TrulyErgonomic and Kinesis Advantage (both have split and unstaggered key layout) and the relatively inexpensive CM Storm QuickFire Rapid.

  81. Did he type this question at 180 WPM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "(__in the typing world__, five characters defines a word __in the typing world__, in case you were wondering)"

    Also, 180 WPM means ((180 word/min * 5 chars/word) / 60 sec/min) == 15 chars/second. That's amazing.

    But I can type at 180 WPM, too! Here's proof:

    asiodj asoijioweiofjweoifjsofn sjk.dnf jnwsfiuwebafp sf;j shofihncesofhcamsfrnhabeilsutbf colshueflmcniuagsebobfhacnesuixclofp osegurfncgsieufbcn,segcixsetv focuilbxsnicufcniulseg fiulvgzseo7wcirlnysw4hyryaeulsbnhyovfsmef9hycezfmnhkzsnhflietsnfc

    Nobody is interested in my special typing skills. :-(

  82. Mavis Beacon by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    You need to talk to Mavis Beacon.

  83. Re:Hello? Editors? by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

    This is the most appropriate "Redundant" moderated post I've ever seen.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
    - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  84. There are other layouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learning another layout will be like starting over in some respects, but if you're going for a record, it might be necessary. There are other options than dvorak with the same gains and less learning curve. for starters, look up colemak, asset, workman, klavaro, norman, capewell, and minimak.

  85. Get a new layout, but not dvorak by Norny · · Score: 1

    If you look at studies like Carpalx (http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/), the Patrick Gillespie layout analyzer (http://patorjk.com/keyboard-layout-analyzer/) or even just one of the layout homepages that compares itself to others (http://normanlayout.info/compare), then you'll see there are more efficient keyboard layouts than Dvorak without it's traumatic learning curve. If nothing else, Colemak is widely adopted by all but Microsoft and is probably a better efficiency choice than Dvorak.

    1. Re:Get a new layout, but not dvorak by drewm1980 · · Score: 1

      +1 to this. Dvorak was laid out by a guy using only single character occurrence frequencies, and a hunch that alternating hands is a good idea. In modern times, we have computers to rapidly search through key layouts to maximize much better designed objective functions. If you're really serious about this you can probably design an objective function that optimizes your key layout for speed, and computationally determine a layout that is fastest on the data set they use for records testing.

  86. hmmmmm by someones1 · · Score: 1

    Back in grade school, the typing software that we used clocked me at about 232 wpm. Don't know how accurate it was or anything, but I still can't imagine you'd be anywhere near a record attempt at the level indicated in your submittal.

  87. Keyboard Recommendations by jon3k · · Score: 1

    I use a RealForce tenkeyless. The key travel, return and feel is absolutely second to none, you won't believe the difference. If you want the "Cadillac" and are willing to spend more for something you'll have for a long time, I'd consider a Topre based keyboard like the RealForce.

    Short of that, get any keyboard with Cherry MX switches. I prefer brown but some people have a different preference. Good luck!

  88. Hello World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you learn how to type hello world really fast you will make it.

  89. flawless victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should give Typing House of the Dead a whirl. It's a Japanese Dreamcast game that I don't think ever made it to our consoles. Easy to find, tho. winkwink nudgenudge

  90. No longer a world record category by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was reading the biography of the previous world record holder in typing speed, who did use DVORAK. However the article said the category has been REMOVED from the Guiness book. I seem to recall reading somewhere that the switch from typewriter to computer keyboard created some kind of issue with this record. Also I read that professional live close caption writers, who use special auto-correct software can maintain well over 200 wpm

  91. Kinesis keyboards by pz · · Score: 1

    Keinesis contoured keyboards. A little relearning necessary, but much faster in the end. You can even get them with DVORAK layout, I believe.

    http://www.kinesis-ergo.com/

    They sell lots of ergomatic stuff. Look for the keyboards with two wells of keys, one for each hand.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  92. you have asked your question, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now i'll ask mine: what are you doing here?

  93. Guiness not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Guiness World Record is basically utterly useless. It has only entertainment value. Many of the existing records are done under lax rules.

  94. Velotype by krid4 · · Score: 1

    What are some tips to fully maximize one's ability to type at the fastest possible rate? Do you have any specific keyboard recommendations that will improve my speed? Learn Velotype. A good velotypist can type up to 1000 characters per minute. Velotype is an old Dutch invention, see http://velotype.com/ and Wikipedia. Good luck, Dirk

  95. Get the advice of a PM&R Physician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or a Physical Therapist. Carpal Tunnel surgery, though somewhat routine, is no fun. So make sure you're not sacrificing your body at an attempt at a record that almost certainly has no economic benefit for you and will be meaningless for most everybody but yourself.

  96. Watch the french movie "Populaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there is no american release planned, but the french 2012 movie "Populaire" ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2070776/ ) is a comedy about typing in the 50s. It's said the fastest typists at the time were going up to 515 strokes per minute (they had to manage carriage return and reloading sheets of paper).

  97. That is kind of a stupid record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when I say kind of, i really mean it is really dumb and a waste of time.

  98. Re:Dvorak BEST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both my aunt and a colleague switched to DVORAK, both reported what I've read is common: a two week learning curve ending in a 20% speed improvement and complete cessation of Repetitive Stress Syndrome. Using a new keyboard to learn on helps the muscle memory association!

  99. You should probably stick with QWERTY, alas. by adobelis · · Score: 1

    I agree with those who say don't bother with Dvorak. I taught myself Dvorak around 2000 until giving it up in 2004 (fighting with library computers throughout the intervening years). I might have been a little faster in my prime at Dvorak, but not much, and that training probably could have been better spent practicing QWERTY.

    In theory, maybe Dvorak is faster for someone like you, whose typing is fast enough to challenge his max raw finger speed, because of reduced stretching for common letters. But I would say with the retraining there is *risk* -- learning a new layout kills your old muscle memory. Seems all too possible you might confuse your muscles, tangle up your pathways and never get to where you are at QWERTY, or back to where you were if you switched back.

    It is true that the world's fastest English-language typist used Dvorak, however. Barbara Blackburn was a certified Guinness record holder, a Dvorak electric typewriter typist who once maxed out at 212 wpm, and for her efforts was once on Letterman. The Letterman segment is very silly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NndiiezGkNY. NB, the days of the true specialist expert typists are past, alas.

    If you think you are pretty good, check out video of Sean Wrona competing at SXSW in 2010. Seems like there is a little circuit where you can try out your stuff and maybe win a bit of cash.

  100. Try a concave keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The finger travel is reduced in a concave keyboard design, making shorter strokes and therefore higher typing speeds possible. I switched to a Kinesis Advantage keyboard, and noticed accuracy and speed improvements (as well as ergonomic advantages).

  101. change the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should change from qwerty keyboard to a new order of the keys.
    The actual keyboard was designed to allow slow typing so the metallic bars dont hit near the paper.
    Putting the most used keys in the center and the less in the corners should faster the typing.