Slashdot Mirror
Blizzard Reportedly Planning A Linux Game For 2013
It looks like the recent success of Linux gaming has caught Blizzard's eye. According to "a reliable source at the company" 2013 will be the year that "at least one of their very popular titles will see a release for Ubuntu Linux." From the article: "It's been a poorly-kept secret that Blizzard has a native Linux client of World of Warcraft. As recently as 2011, the World of Warcraft Linux client was still being maintained internally. The client has been around for years and done by their own developers as a form of testing for the popular MMORPG currently offered on Windows and Mac OS X. As for why they haven't released the client, it's come down to "targeting a specific version of the platform" with Linux being "unstandardized" due to the many different distributions. There's still some fundamental problems with gaming on Linux. With World of Warcraft working generally fine under Wine as well, the company is further unmotivated to officially support a Linux build of the game."
FTA: " As for why they haven't released the client, it's come down to "targeting a specific version of the platform" with Linux being "unstandardized" due to the many different distributions." Just do what valve does. I mean I'm not going to be playing WoW, but millions do.
Break Wine. Then the free rider problem will be defeated.
Seing how Project: Titan is rumored to be a browser game.
Blizzard used to by favorite gaming company. Now I loathe them. The recent huge disappointment of Diablo 3, the no LAN play in SC2, and with how I heard they seriously dumbed down WoW, Blizzard won't be getting anymore of my money.
It doesn't work that well on wine.... While I get 60fps on windows, same machine running wine does 20fps.... enter a 25man raid -> 2 fps...
Wow is the *only* reason I still have windows on my pcs...
The game will feature always online DRM and will charge you $5 for every launch. Have fun!
Even if they choose one platform, how long will support for that platform last?
When I first started using Linux, Slackware was THE distro to install, then Redhat, then Fedora, then Ubuntu, and now it seems people are crapping on Ubuntu and saying "Install Mint instead." On top of that you've had people that've sworn by Gentoo throughout the timeline. People talk about how DRM will make games unusable whenever company X decides to shut down their authentication servers. I'm not sure how broken packages after the Linux flavour of the year changes will make this any better for Joe End User that's not willing to hunt down some fanmade patch (or trust it for that matter) a couple years later.
...just made Hell freeze over.
YEEEEEEEEEEEAH
It's only "unstandardised" if you want to link against every last library.
If you treat it like OSX or Windows and ship all necessary dylibs/DLLs which aren't provided by default then it works fine.
Somehow companies like Mathworks have been managing this happily for well over a decade without making up weird claims about standardisation. Oh and hey, I've done it too. It's easy.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
I've had my own Linux version of "Hello World" for years!!!!
I used to be like you, complaining that it was 'no big deal' to release a linux game. What could possibly be so hard about it? OpenGL, write once, run anywhere! Then ... I met GLX. And the documentation on opengl.org. And Gallium / LLVM. and Mesa. and ... well. i just try not to think about it too much. The doctors say I should be OK... eventually...
the year of Linux may be upon us. Gaming is the single reason I still run Win-dohs!
What do you do if your video card does not work well with the game you are trying to play for the distribution you are using? If your distribution does not have the time to back port the driver or the framework it uses, you are forced to upgrade your entire distribution if you want to play a game. This is a major inconvenience. Either dedicated supported hardware like what Valve is doing or some stable rolling update distribution is needed. Is there a good stable rolling distribution?
Haha, just a matter of time until Linux freetards start complaining that the games are not open-source.
inquiring minds want to know
Guys, you're missing the point being made here. It's not that the application can't run under different flavors -- it's about supporting them. Every distribution has its own quirks, its own packaging manager, its own set of libraries that are included (and some that aren't). It's a support nightmare. Rather than writing installation instructions once, you have to write it a dozen times. Versions change constantly. Everybody here has experienced the joys of googling for someone's hack script to get something working... a patch here, a tweak there... yes, it's possible.
But from a support perspective, it's difficulty level = nightmare trying to help these people. And they'll expect your help. You just gave them a major application and said it works with Linux... so you better know every flavor, every variation, every configuration possible. And that, right there, is why Blizzard hasn't jumped on the Linux bandwagon -- too many support variables.
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
It will most likely work fine with Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, etc, as well as Mint and Debian. Linux dependency management is very mature, and there will likely be minimal problems getting it working on other distributions.
The Linux community can support itself. All they need is to release a tar.gz binary package and the distributions will make their own packages and instructions. Blizzard can release it and say "Support yourselves, we're only releasing binaries. Have fun" and the community will do the rest.
Fragmentation.
I'll play valve. I'll buy DRM.
I even played and purchased all blizzard games in the past.
After they won a prior injunction against the makers of glider publishing their source code, I will never again buy any blizzard or activision product, or that of anyone who purchases and owns them.
This is the price of using the courts to prevent speech that does not cause physical harm.
Sorry blizzard -- nothing you do will ever save your name with me. I won't even play your games stolen or paid. Your company isn't just dead to me, it's got blood taint.
Great, just fragment Linux more and more by releasing stuff "for Ubuntu".
Ubuntu isn't Linux anymore; a proper game for Linux is released for any sufficiently recent Linux distro, not for one flavour only.
Gaming for Linux (or, more specifically, binary blobs in Linux) have absolutely no future, since every distro has its own version of every library.
You know, you look at this the exact wrong way.
Linux can allow the game distributor to provide the exact versions of the libraries they want. All you need to do is plop them all into one directory, say $INSTALL_DIR/lib/, and then have the wrapper run script prepend that directory to LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
And if that wasn't enough, the games company can even provide a bootable Linux DVD or USB stick which boots into linux and starts the game. Can't have much more control over the OS software than that!
Blizzard ...
Meh.
Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
With Canonical becoming ever less popular with the community, the gaming companies should form a consortium and roll their own linux distro. An innovative company, like Steam perhaps, could even take the lead and just do it themselves. Doing so could be a real headstart and leave the other gaming companies clamoring to catch up.
[nt]
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Just release a general statically linked executable for ALL Linux distros.
Is close-source software likely to have problems with the LGPL if they link statically instead of dynamically? That's a question, not an accusation -- I don't know which libraries game makers are likely to use, and whether they are LGPL or something else.
It looks like the recent success of Linux gaming has caught Blizzard's eye.
I actually laughed out loud at this. You guys have lost your mind. Have fun playing games from 3 years ago.
Gaming for Linux (or, more specifically, binary blobs in Linux) have absolutely no future, since every distro has its own version of every library.
You know, you look at this the exact wrong way.
Linux can allow the game distributor to provide the exact versions of the libraries they want. All you need to do is plop them all into one directory, say $INSTALL_DIR/lib/, and then have the wrapper run script prepend that directory to LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
And if that wasn't enough, the games company can even provide a bootable Linux DVD or USB stick which boots into linux and starts the game. Can't have much more control over the OS software than that!
So much THIS.
Releasing for a particular distro is lazy development and only serves to fragment the Linux market, not support it.
"I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
...provide a bootable Linux DVD or USB stick which boots into linux and starts the game.
I remember doing that back in the days of DOS. Either it was a custom boot floppy with specific changes in config.sys and autoexec.bat, or it was just one custom boot floppy that contained the game as well.
What was once old is now new again.
Life is not for the lazy.
Linux the third major OS = HALF LIFE 3!
Presumably some libraries will call into the kernel. Is it the case that a particular version of (say) libc will work against any kernel? (I'm genuinely asking -- I have vague memories of hitting an issue like this trying to run a statically linked binary on an ancient Linux.)
That may work to some extent, and that is what is often done in Windows, but there is still the matter of the libraries being compatible with the hardware architecture, frameworks, and drivers. If the later is not compatible, and the user has to figure out how to get the right components or even update their distribution, that is a problem.
As far as a game company rolling their own distribution to play the game, I am not sure that is something a game company would want to do, unless it is for dedicated hardware (i.e. like what Valve is planning), but it is an interesting idea. Its akin to treating your computer as a traditional gaming console where each game contains the entire OS it needs to run the game. I could see that working. It may even have advantages of greater stability for users who use Windows or Mac, and has the advantage of working on any hardware platform.
well with windows vista,7, most of 8 are about the same and need little changed to make a app work on all of them.
XP mainly is stuck with a older DX and older driver model.
linux has the libs mess and distributions update much faster then windows does.
The server windows os are based on the desktop ones under the hood.
If Urban Terrors unpaid developers can figure out an installer that's worked on every distribution I've tried, why can't Blizzard's? UT doesn't have a "support nightmare", their shit just works.
Ok so a lot of people seem to be critical of the "Ubuntu is not the summation of linux!" but come on seriously, a real game development company isn't going to maintain their own libraries to run the game, that's what the distribution is for. So they picked one distro to support and went with it. If the solution for every single commercial developer is to "just release your own libraries" then I'm sorry to say we might as well just relegate this whole Linux thing to a neat geeks OS. Because that's the same kind of crap they're facing with Microsoft, except they probably make a lot more money on M$ derivatives. This touches on something that Linux so desperately needs, standardization, not that we should all run the same standard libraries or that everything has to be correct, but things need to be planned out more effectively to support a huge swath of companies that develop products that are hugely dependent on the OS.
Good leaders run toward problems, bad leaders hide from them.
im planning to have sun shine and no blizzard
this works for me and its another who cares moment
bootable works till the video / sound / network drivers get out of date / are missing what in your system.
MS will hit anittrust rules by trying the app store only view.
The different distros(distrobutions) has different applications & GUI(Graphic User Interface), ie Gnome, KDE E17, etc. Are you wanting to write code for a certain application? Instead of writing code using OpenGL, are you wanting to write code using QT5 Framework, KDE Framework, etc? QT / KDE / Gnome installs on Linux & MS-Windows.
The most recent version of glibc supports kernels up to seven years old. The most recent kernel should be able to run any statically-linked ELF binary (and can, if configured for it, still run 32-bit a.out binaries).
So it's really a non-issue for anything that's being actively maintained, as long as they're willing to include a full copy of the libraries they use (and anything those libraries link to), or just statically link the entire thing. It's a bit of extra overhead, but considering just how many resources a modern game needs to load and use beyond the basic system libraries, it should be pretty much unnoticeable.
For something that isn't actively maintained, you might run into odd compatibility problems, but if it's 100% statically-linked (or includes the entire dependency tree for every library it links to), it should generally still be able to run fine unless something fundamentally changes about the system (i.e., X11 -> Weyland could cause issues).
Well, before I start, I'm not (or rather for a long while no longer) a WoW fan, but I did briefly try it again recently. So, you know, I'm only having a superficial impression. I don't think I'll bother much with it, but...
I think that as far as "dumbing down" goes, it really sounds worse than it really is, when you do the Vulcan thing and think about it logically.
1. Most of the stuff you'll only notice if you've played it before and have any particular attachment (even if just for nostalgia sake) about the old system. Truth is, I most other recent games are just about as "dumbed down".
You can play TOR for example as a DPS Trooper with little more than Grav Round, Full Auto and High Impact Bolt as the only three buttons you'll ever have to press. Heck, you could play it with Grav Round only, if you don't mind losing a little DPS. Trust me, that's actually less skill needed than WoW even now. (And obviously the Bounty Hunter is the same deal, just with different names on the buttons you press.)
2. For that matter, it's not really dumber than WoW used to be to start with. Anyone remember the pre-Burning Crusade raids that some classes only needed one button to get through? Ironically, for all its reputation of a noob class, the Hunter was technically the most "complex" to play since it needed a whole THREE buttons. Yeah, you also needed to set the hunter mark and send the pet, so, yeah, that's a whole two whole extra buttons :p
(Not to mention you had more typing or talking to do than the raid leader, what with having to tell everyone that yes, the pet was on passive, every time anything went wrong, no matter who started it or what actually happened. You could be still running back from the cemetery when the rest of the group did something stupid, and they'd still insist that it's somehow the pet not being on passive that caused it. I mean, it wasn't even in the dungeon, but it must have caused it. Somehow.;))
Yeah, it didn't really start as a sort of modern day chess or go or other complex thinking game. Nor had the geekiest and smartest population. Really, it was from the start a game that 6 year olds can master.
So let's get on to what really changed:
3. So now for a bunch of quests you don't have to run back to the quest giver to get the next step of it. Well, it takes some getting used to it, but at the end of the day, it's not like running back and forth was actually the fun part.
4. You don't have to keep buying skill upgrades every 2 levels; they now increase in effect with your level. Not only it's like how a bunch of other games were working already (e.g., COH), but basically if you've been on the game long enough to have a valid whine about being used to the old system... guess what? Paying a few coppers to buy the skills on a new alt wasn't really a balance factor any more anyway.
Plus, again, running back to wherever your trainer was, and then back, was hardly something that added any fun.
5. The talent trees. Well, the issue with those is two-fold:
A) Most people were going for cookie-cutter builds from some site anyway. Not just in COH, but generally. Whether it's actually talent trees (e.g., TOR, RIFT, etc) or putting points in some skill (e.g., STO), most people just want something that works, not to solve a puzzle. If there had been some way to tell the computer "just go by this build off that site" automatically, most people would have just done it. And in effect that's what the new system does.
B) You haven't actually lost much. In addition to the choice every 15 levels now, many of which are actually new extras, a bunch of the old talents everyone took for a given spec are now automatic passive skills, that you get automatically when reaching a certain level. So, you know, you haven't actually lost them or anything, and they were not that much of a choice in the first place anyway. Now you just get them automatically instead of having to click through the tree.
C) Basically it doesn't let you mak
A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
This is actually just a theoretical last option. I've never heard anyone using it in the last ten years.
Blizzard doesn't make games anymore.
They produce cash-cow environments that are doomed to fail, and when they inevitably do they just shrug their shoulders and start releasing tidbits about the next "major game" they're working on so all the fanboys have something to hold them over. Everything about these so-called "games" are designed to keep you in the game as long as possible and get you to spend as much money as possible, because Blizzard gets a cut out of everything. When people finally figure things out and the in-game economy crashes, it doesn't matter because Blizzard has already made their penny.
Blizzard games are work. You're working to make Blizzard money. You're basically becoming their employee by playing their games, because Blizzard games today are all about dangling a carrot in front of you and occasionally throwing you a bone- but not too much that you actually start to enjoy yourself, just enough that you don't quit the game in complete and utter boredom. If they can hook you with the way things are setup now, then they basically know that you're addicted to the game so you'll probably go out of your way to mentally bypass the serious pitfalls and shortcomings of their games. The more you play their games, the more money they make. That is all Blizzard cares about.
They don't even really care about making the game amazing anymore, which is evident by their blatant recycling of post-launch trailers into the game itself. I was seriously disappointed to see that the introduction to SC2 was the same damned video they released years before SC2 actually came out- just with some tweaked lighting and a crappy voice over (which the intro would have been better without). Then they did the same damned thing with the Azmodan reveal trailer for Diablo 3- it landed up right smack in the centre of the retail game, almost entirely unchanged. Why would you do this? Your fans have already seen those videos a hundred times over. It puts a real damper on things when you realize that 5 of the 20 minutes of in-game cutscenes ('scenes rendered externally from the game engine) is the same thing you've already seen.
So I'm not sure why anyone really cares about this.
It's like cheering because a swarm of locust came to your crop field and decimated everything. Why do you want that kind of attention?
And if that wasn't enough, the games company can even provide a bootable Linux DVD or USB stick which boots into linux and starts the game. Can't have much more control over the OS software than that!
It is a GPL violation to create such bundle, assuming that they use binary drivers (and open source ones aren't really capable at this point).
Coding etudes
They don't deserve your money.
The 3d driver situation on Linux needs to be addressed. Something along the lines of having up to date drivers in the basic repositories would be ideal, but even just having a download option on the vendor site would suffice.
You are all sooo wrong, WOW wont run on Lin
ux.Linux dont have decent video drivers.PERIOD.
I've got my popcorn popped, butter is on it, it's all salted up. I'm ready to watch this show.
It's gonna be good.
It's the most important thing to do.
One problem: what to do when a security vulnerability is found in one of the bundled libs? The distributor of the game might not be so fast on updating the whole game bundle. And letting the users/package maintainers manually replace the libraries is bound to be unreliable and error-prone.
A video game company using a bootable solution would likely keep the OS distribution up to date, so it is always using the latest stable video / sound / network drivers.
They won't hit anything, they are no longer being monitored by the FTC.
@Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
"targeting a specific version of the platform?"
.deb for ubuntu, and it will filter into derivatives like mint.
.tar.gz with the compiled binaries and make file with install instructions, a README and INSTALL files.
what?
Release a
Most GNU/Linux libraries are pretty standard, and version compatibility is pretty wide.
For everything else, release a
From this, every other distro will be able to make their own packages.
Seems Firefox has had some problems: http://blog.gerv.net/2011/01/why_firefox_on_linux_is_not_accelerated/. The salient quote being: "We tried enabling OpenGL on Linux, and discovered that most Linux drivers are so disastrously buggy (think 'crash the X server at the drop of a hat, and paint incorrectly the rest of the time' buggy) that we had to disable it for now."
Also doing some more basic compositing and doing a full out 3D game are things that are a bit different in terms of complexity and problems.
I'm going to say Blizzard probably knows what they are talking about. They have quite a few graphics developers, quite a few QA people, quite a few sysadmins, and so on and oh, they were the ones who wrote the client. They probably have a reason for what they are doing.
türkiyenin en orjinal yabanci dizi sitesi
http://www.originaltr.com
The question may be which layer to target, where the line should be between system libraries and distributed libraries. Providing the entire stack down to libc and libX11 sounds bloated and error-prone. Relying on binary compatibility with the lowest layer of userspace might not be the best idea either...
I think the next layer up is probably the right place, libraries that abstract away the hardware and windowing. We have OpenGL and SDL, for example, to cover pretty much all of that, and targeting a range of glibc versions ought to cover the rest. Maybe you can get away with linking to the system's gtk or Qt libraries too. Then you can rely on your distribution teams to make the underlying system work cohesively and you can focus more on your program and not running afoul of SELinux. ;)
Note that you cannot completely ignore glibc compatibility issues. Different glibc versions may not be entirely backwards-compatible. (See the upstream tracker .) And there certainly is no guarantee of forwards compatibility. However, if it's just glibc to worry about, at least the space for issues is relatively small.
Gaming for Linux (or, more specifically, binary blobs in Linux) have absolutely no future, since every distro has its own version of every library.
Static compilation solves this easily.
At this point, the nVidia binary driver is the only driver out there that provides what you get on Windows, which is to say all the latest features, good speed, and stability. Anything else makes compromises of varying amounts. Now for a simple game, this might be ok. Some games stick with 2D, use SDL, and call it a day. They'll work with the SVGA X server if it comes to that, perhaps just with some tearing/slow graphics. However for a modern 3D game that makes use of some fancy features, that doesn't cut it.
Well that situation is a problem. For one it is a problem simply because not everyone has an nVidia card but then of course there's the whole religious crusade some people have against closed source, particularly with regards to drivers.
With pro applications, you can just say "Quadro or GTFO" and require the binary driver. People will deal with it. With this? All it would do is get them all kinds of hate mail.
Also, funny enough, when you talk OpenGL, nVidia is the only one who really does it well in Windows too. Not long ago at work we had a system that was running HFSS. That does not require OpenGL, but will use it if available to accelerate graphics. The system had an ass slow graphics card (it was a server repurposed to be a workstation basically) and so a new video card was wanted. We picked up a cheap AMD 7000 series card... and ran in to a strange problem: In remote desktop, HFSS worked fine. On the system itself, no dice.
After going around and around a sneaking suspicion creeped up on me. I pulled the AMD card and stuck in an nVidia card. Everything started working.
nVidia produces top flight OpenGL drivers, which on Windows are as fast as their Driect3D drivers (which are really fast). Everyone else... much more hit or miss.
Dear Bliz devs:
I've bought every expansion as soon as I can.
I run WoW in wine.
If we get an official port, me and all my friends will buy some of those white elephant knick knacks you like to sell.
While I applaud Steam and Blizzard for moving towards Linux for a few things, I am horrified by the ways that some of these companies (Yes you, Steam...) expect you to download software.
Sure, they give you a repository with a package, but only after they create some http only (non SSL) .sh script that they expect you to run as root via sudo that installs a stub package which, without your direct consent, adds a key via apt-key to the trust db and adds the repository.
If you did ANY of those things in any modern distribution, you would not only take some serious flames, but you would never have your package accepted into the repositories.
What I am getting at is that, while it is nice to have big companies support Linux, they _MUST_ do so in the right way, and put security first. Otherwise, they could ultimately could be responsible for destroying the entire (semi)secure system that we have spent the last two decades to refine!
Please, put more effort into security and _proper_ packaging. You will be respected more if you do :)
Blizzard wants to be able to say if you have XYZ configuration, then it will work. If it doesn't work, then here's our 1-800 number, our email support system etc etc... for which you are entitled to contact since you bought the game and your system meets the requirements.
I run SC2 under win7 without any problems, however, if I installed it and it crashed upon startup I could call them up and have a Blizzard tech provide me with assistance. If I called them up and said, "I'm running this under the win32 emulator that's part of OS/2 Warp, they'd politely tell them that it is an unsupported and untested configuration and might give me some sort of "best effort" support, which wouldn't equate to much and then eventually refer me to some forums...
Imagine the uproar that would take place if they released something for Ubuntu version X, and all the people running either version Y or some other distribution would flame Blizzard... "You're not supporting *my* distribution..."
For a garage startup [...] you can do something with SDL libs which are fucking fantastic across all platforms.
But how would a garage startup derive revenue from a 2D game? I thought that for at least the past several years, it has been the expectation among end users that all newly developed 2D games must be free to play because they're competing with the free-to-play SWF games on Newgrounds and Kongregate.
drivers need to be in the kernel tree or packaged by your distribution
One problem here is that a 2-year-old LTS distribution isn't necessarily going to have drivers for new hardware released since the distribution went gold. How do you recommend to work around this?
GPL - We're all about freedom, but only if you think exactly like us. Anyone else can shove it.
Ultima because it hated DOS's memory manager =)
What a wonderful game too.
When the next Xbox rolls around, you can be sure M$ (yep I go there)is gonna squeeze game makers hard.
By "game makers", are you referring to the big professional studios developing for Xbox Live Arcade or the semi-pro studios developing for Xbox Live Indie Games?
Software in boxes is dead.
How is this true when the best available ISP in some parts of the United States limits users to 10 GB per month, and some PlayStation 3 games are already three times that?
[Microsoft Corporation is] no longer being monitored by the FTC.
The U.S. is not the only major industrialized country, and its FTC is not the only competition regulator in major industrialised markets.
Steam works great in Gentoo Linux, I would expect Gentoo to be the absolute worst to get it running on, but it works!
A video game company using a bootable solution would likely keep the OS distribution up to date, so it is always using the latest stable video / sound / network drivers.
they maybe thought about that.. but then came to realization that it wasn't really linux support then - it was standalone support.
seriously the last game worth booting for was pirates! for pc(xt).
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
the games company can even provide a bootable Linux DVD or USB stick which boots into linux and starts the game. Can't have much more control over the OS software than that!
Stop giving them stupid ideas. Nobody is going to reboot just to play a game, much less waste time copying gigs and gigs into a USB stick (digital distribution) before having to reboot. And what if the hardware changes? Then I'll have to add drivers to their stupid distro. Ubisoft just called, they want to hire you.
Blizzard: So we're thinking about supporting linux, just one distro but you can try and get it running on whatever you want.
Linux Users: How dare you.
This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
I think GPL'ers get real mad and raise pichforks when things like TIVO do this without contributing. But yeah its a bad attitude to have. But you can work around it or just take the legal risk and pay em off.
And there's already a bunch of ways to do something like this! I stumbled onto CDE a while ago when I thought "WTF, Ubuntu has the Common Desktop Environment in its repos?!".
No, it goes in /opt/vendor/package-name/lib, along with all the debris from that vendor's package. man pages, docs, libraries, and configuration files all go there for major non-system comopnents, according to the File System Hierarchy (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/).
The fact that "$INSTALL_DIR" is so inconsistently handled on so many different systems is part of the support nightmare. Don't get me *started* on the installers that stuff customized PATH, MANPATH, and other system options in by default for every user.
Ahahaha.... you believe that? I remember back when Win2k was new and XP coming out... a whole heap of my 1999/2000 purchased Windows 98 games would not run on anything newer. They were never updated.
Once it is shipped, most game publishers (looking at you, EA) don't give a shit about support for new platforms.
I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
actually worked for Blizzard for a while... lol
i ask because the projects you mentioned don't seem to have heavy OpenGL functionality like a game might need. .. .then there is sound.... anyways...
a lot of games in particular are bleeding edge users of graphics effects
and +5 interesting to boot.
well i guess i am done here, so many people with so much experience and knowledge.
If the economy isn't good cash-strapped Govs may decide to supplement their budgets with hefty fines.
I look forward to not purchasing their new linux game.
It will most likely work fine with Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, etc, as well as Mint and Debian. Linux dependency management is very mature, and there will likely be minimal problems getting it working on other distributions.
Steam on Linux beta, designed for Ubuntu, requires quite a lot of magic to get installed on Debian. Definitely within capabilities of a Linux enthusiast, but too much hassle even for a veteran who polished his system a couple of years ago and now just expects everything to work fine.
Because all 12 of the gamers who would play WoW with a native client are already happily playing with the Windows client under WINE/Cedega/POL and wouldn't care.
When will the Linux-heads around here understand that Linux isn't pervasive in the home, thus, requiring mainstream software companies to spend a lot of money, for very little return?
but people tend to want to ignore that when they pay for a game or pay a subscription. So this is more than likely the area where Blizzard is concerned.
As in, they are going to charge and most people don't care for "best of luck" when they are buying something. I doubt Linux users will be any different.
If you have seen their forums it is amazing the number of problems people have on supported platforms
* Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
Gentoo is often the most up-to-date Linux. There are some benefits to their model. Most of them went away when we all started using the same architecture, though.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Biggest non MMO PC game I have seen yet is Max Payne 3 at 30 GB, RAGE is second at 21 GB. Most games are 7-8 GB, roughly the size of a dual layer DVD that Xbox games are made on.
I was referring to Metal Gear Solid 4 for PlayStation 3, which is about as big as the Max Payne 3 you mentioned.
With USB 3 and cheap flash, we could see scenarios where you go into "Future GameStore" with your 128-512 GB USB 3.0 stick you bought for $20 and have your game loaded on it at 90MB/sec.
A customer brought in her MP3 player and the store wouldn't sell her music for it. So if stores aren't willing to sell music to be loaded onto a carried-in storage device, what makes you think they're willing to do that for PC games?
Look, let's put it like this. For you, who not doubt know the system, and studied the spell rotation, and may have solved the puzzle of how to shave 0.5 seconds off a cooldown to get a better attack chain... yeah, I can imagine you'd get some satisfaction out of that.
But... let me give you an example of what a day in the life of a real newbie is like. And I swear I'm not making it up.
This is quite literally what happened the second day of trying to get mom addicted to WoW.
So I log in and invite her to a group, and she's a ghost. Well, that kinda thing happens. She runs straight past me to her corpse, resses, and keeps running straight into the next group of troggs, and starts swinging her axe at them. Plants, runs back to her corpse and does it again. And plants again.
Well, I figure she's getting into character as a dwarf warrior with a big axe. After all, the previous day she had exterminated every single rabbit and squirrel within range. In retrospect, I think even that was just a case of not yet grasping what she was supposed to kill and what not.
Well, anyway, I had rolled a priest for just that kind of occasion, so I switch characters and keep healing her on the next try. It wasn't easy. She kept fighting with no regards to any self-preservation, like someone trying in all earnest to earn her place in Valhalla or maybe Sto'vo'kor (Klingon Valhalla;)). She done me proud, she did.
Then I ask her where was she going. Says she doesn't know. I ask her to follow me to go repair and replace her equipment, she asks where am I. I'm kinda surprised at that point, because her character was some 10 yards from mine and looking at me. I start jumping up and down and ask whether she sees me now. No, she doesn't.
Well, to cut a long story short, at some point she had apparently yanked the mouse while using the right mouse button. I swear to the FSM, she was literally seeing just the top of her head and maybe 2 ft in front and behind, and maybe 3 ft to each side. She was running into those troggs just by sheer virtue of not seeing them.
You'd think that including a line about being able to turn the camera would do the trick, but... it actually took another 15 levels or so, and drowning about a dozen times, before it turned out she doesn't understand wth is that "camera" I'm talking about. For her the only camera she knew about, was that thing on her desk she had photographed squirrels in the park with. She kept looking in her in-game bags for anything that might be a camera.
THAT is the kind of problems the newbies have, not min-maxing stuff in a talent tree. When you're that green, you don't even understand wth they're asking you to do, much less feel any accomplishment for clicking randomly and then turning out it's the wrong choice. And, as I was trying to illustrate, you have much more pressing problems than that.
A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Just release it for Debian based distros by default because almost all Linux users use a Debian based distro anyways, and have the source code readily available for the rest to modify and get running as they wish.
On the contrary. I already mentioned that there are choices that matter, and choices that don't really matter. And that WoW did increase complexity in the areas that actually are part of the game, like raid tactics (used to be you didn't need pretty much any), while reducing the complexity of, yes, that kind of metagaming.
I don't see how that counts as a dichotomy.
I'd be all for more choices in the actual game, but I can't say I see what's the mourning about when it comes to choices that were at best illusionary (like whether you really want to buy your next tier of spells) and at worst just a metagaming exercise that nobody but the alpha nerds were into (like the talents.)
A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
because you know, if they didnt, they might actually need Mesa.
Steam works great in Gentoo Linux, I would expect Gentoo to be the absolute worst to get it running on, but it works!
Can you use "emerge steam", or do you have to install the deb package and resolve conflicts and dependencies manually?
Since the release of Warcraft II, I was a die hard Blizzard fan. All the way through Warcraft III, Diablo, Diablo II, up to Starcraft II. I run these games on GNU/Linux with Wine, and it's great. However, with the release of Diablo III and forcing online-only game play, I'm done with Blizzard. I think it's great that they may be considering a title for the GNU/Linux platform, which is gaining ground for a great gaming platform, however Blizzard's current focus has been shifted away from providing a quality game to making as much money as possible. And it's very unfortunate as its past products have been top notch.
what can i say. some of us are too old to play games -- arthritis, bad eye sight...
Hello!!! everybody, Fashion,low price,the good shoping place, click in. ===== ( http://www.sheptrade.com/ ) ===== Discount Air Jordan (1-24) shoes $35, Air max shoes (TN LTD BW 90 180) $36, Nike/shox (R4, NZ, OZ, TL1, TL2, TL3) $35, Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi D&G) $36, T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $20, Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$35, Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach,Armaini )$16, Watches(Rolex BREITLING IWC) New era cap $12, Discount (NFL MLB NBA NHL) jerseys, free shipping, Accept credit card payment! ===== ( http://www.sheptrade.com/ ) =====
Hello!!! everybody, Fashion,low price,the good shoping place, click in. ===== ( http://www.sheptrade.com/ ) ===== Discount Air Jordan (1-24) shoes $35, Air max shoes (TN LTD BW 90 180) $36, Nike/shox (R4, NZ, OZ, TL1, TL2, TL3) $35, Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi D&G) $36, T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $20, Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$35, Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach,Armaini )$16, Watches(Rolex BREITLING IWC) New era cap $12, Discount (NFL MLB NBA NHL) jerseys, free shipping, Accept credit card payment! ===== ( http://www.sheptrade.com/ ) =====