Slashdot Mirror


Reasons You're Not Getting Interviews; Plus Some Crazy Real Resume Mistakes

Yvonne Lee, Community Manager at Dice.com writes, "Not using standard job titles, not tying your work to real business results and not using the right keywords can mean never getting called for an interview, even if you have the right skills to do the job. I once heard advice to use the exact wording found in the ad when placing your keywords. I think you're even more unlikely to get a job if you do some of the things on this list."

246 comments

  1. LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yvonne Lee, Toolbag Mouthpiece at Dice.com writes, "Using a thinly veiled facade to make yourself appear to be a PR authority figure, not tying your true intent to forced Slashdot stories and not letting the site continue on as it was can mean the systematic destruction of the very asset you paid good money for, even if you thought you have the right skills to do the job. I once heard advice to let the editors decide what is newsworthy and what is not. I think you're even more unlikely to get a return on your investment if you do exactly what I'm doing right now."

    1. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What she really thinks she's doing: "Using job and industry news to increase user stickiness, SEO performance and conversion into jobs database". I wonder how that's working out?

    2. Re:LMFTFY by SomePgmr · · Score: 4

      The best part was the tag, "nodice". I got a laugh out of that... can we make it a recurring thing if we keep getting these?

    3. Re:LMFTFY by cod3r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      what exactly is a community manager?

    4. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      User stickiness? You're still here, ain'tcha?

    5. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What she really thinks she's doing: "Using job and industry news to increase user stickiness, SEO performance and conversion into jobs database". I wonder how that's working out?

      Not going to touch "increase user stickiness" with a ten foot pole.

      What's depressing is that she's been at this shit for 10 years, and her top accomplishments are things like, "simultaneously managed two magazine sections and a web publication."

      The problem with all these stories on how to write your resume is that they're written by people who are fundamentally useless and are stuck writing puff pieces and managing someone's twitter account.

    6. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I hate to piggyback off a first post just to get my post near the top, but is there a way to revert to the old continuous layout (where you just click a button at the bottom for more stories) instead of this paginated layout?

    7. Re:LMFTFY by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not going to touch "increase user stickiness" with a ten foot pole.

      I see what you did there.

    8. Re:LMFTFY by richlv · · Score: 4, Informative

      wahaha. i only opened this article to comment that it's an annoying amount of non-geek advertisement-like stories from dice - thanks for putting it first in a more humourous way :)

      my search for previous adverts revealed lower right corner text "Slashdot is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company"

      bad website, bad. sit, no bone for you.

      --
      Rich
    9. Re:LMFTFY by mindwhip · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not for very much longer if this spam continues. I've been reading /. for much longer than my userid would indicate (just never got around to registering) but I'm seriously considering removing it from my home tabs and looking elsewhere for news for nerds that is actually news and stuff that actually matters and not this crap.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    10. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'll continue to open a new tab and type in "slashdot.org" when you're bored, completely out of muscle memory. I swore this site off back when Geeknet was screwing it up and it didn't work; now that Dice is screwing it up and I'm still here, I'm not going to bother with "I'll never come here again if you don't stop being terrible" threats that, realistically, I'm just not going to follow through on.

    11. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What else is there to go to? Reddit?

    12. Re:LMFTFY by jythie · · Score: 1

      At this point I am skeptical to take advice from people at Dice. When they start posting actual jobs maybe I will listen... but for the moment I do not think they really have the needs of job hunters in mind.

    13. Re:LMFTFY by greenreaper · · Score: 1

      Reddit plus Ars Technica could probably replace it handily. How many "summaries" could simply be replaced by a better title - or just opening up the article?

    14. Re:LMFTFY by IANAAC · · Score: 2

      Reddit plus Ars Technica could probably replace it handily. How many "summaries" could simply be replaced by a better title - or just opening up the article?

      I generally like what people post on Reddit, but damn, the up-vote/down-vote herd mentality is awful. Wish they had a better way to moderate.

    15. Re:LMFTFY by mutube · · Score: 1

      user stickiness

      My first thought was "ewww"... but then, maybe she does understand Slashdot after all?

    16. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I generally like what people post on Reddit, but damn, the up-vote/down-vote herd mentality is awful. Wish they had a better way to moderate.

      Ars just introduced the same style voting.

      Really, the up/down vote is a great way to moderate if you want to develop a fan base. People who want to see challenging ideas are a tiny minority.

    17. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not for very much longer if this spam continues. I've been reading /. for much longer than my userid would indicate (just never got around to registering) but I'm seriously considering removing it from my home tabs and looking elsewhere for news for nerds that is actually news and stuff that actually matters and not this crap.

      You do it bit by bit. And it's not just /., you want to give up *comments*, because that shit is just a time sink.

      Last election I swore off politics for a year, so I'm just avoiding sites that are political, and staying out of stupid political arguments.

      That's quite easy to do, and I'm avoiding a lot of the stupid /. arguments.

      Next, I've changed my password to something random and not saved it, as well as changing the email address to go nowhere.

      So, no more posting for mod points or to see what people say.

      And I'm slowly adding more sites to my reader, and getting google.com/reader into my muscle memory.

      The other thing to do is start blogging. When you see something you want to comment on, you put it on a damned blog instead of posting a comment.

    18. Re:LMFTFY by greenreaper · · Score: 2

      Over at Flayrah we use star-based voting with comment fading/folding, thread-parent rating inheritance and a sense of karma for both registered users and anons (IP-based). It's been reasonably effective in its primary goal (cutting down on trolls and counter-productive argument threads), and while it is open to some forms of gaming, this is mostly ineffective due to the monitoring we can provide as a small site. Every form of user-centric moderation is going to have its drawbacks - ultimately you are relying on the plebs to decide what's good. You can give some people super-voting power, which may help.

    19. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how long this Dice.com spam will continue. I was hoping they would get theirs servers down and not mess with /. again... Sigh...

    20. Re:LMFTFY by Georules · · Score: 1

      I am, as well, a slave to this habit. It's a hard life.

    21. Re:LMFTFY by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      we need a 'slashNOT.org' site.

      actually, we already have one, but its misspelled as slashdot

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:LMFTFY by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      its a network application that uses SNMPv1 or v2c.

      (sorry, very geeky joke)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    23. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatives?

    24. Re:LMFTFY by David_W · · Score: 2

      Sorry to toot my own horn, but that may be my doing... note that this one was tagged nodice before I got here, so hopefully people are picking up the trend.

      (Wow, I may have started a Slashdot trend... should I be proud or sad...)

    25. Re:LMFTFY by smellotron · · Score: 3, Informative

      You'll continue to open a new tab and type in "slashdot.org" when you're bored, completely out of muscle memory.

      It's worse for Opera users. I type /. into my address bar to get here. Including the Enter key, that's 3 keystrokes all in an addictive little cluster.

    26. Re:LMFTFY by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The problem with all these stories on how to write your resume is that they're written by people who are fundamentally useless and are stuck writing puff pieces and managing someone's twitter account.

      Oh wow, let that be repeated.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    27. Re:LMFTFY by DeadBeef · · Score: 1

      ditto regarding the badly disguised spam stuff.

      I was here before there were user id's and I just happened to get in pretty early the day they opened registrations.

      --
      I am a lawyer and this constitutes legal advice and I shall indemnify you against any losses arising from taking it.
    28. Re:LMFTFY by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Whirlpool, MIT Journal, Ars Technica in a pinch. The Reg is a favourite.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    29. Re:LMFTFY by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      What else is there to go to? Reddit?

      Between The Register and Torrent Freak, you will get most of the good stories on slashdot, and a day or two early!

    30. Re:LMFTFY by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      The problem with all these stories on how to write your resume is that they're written by people who are fundamentally useless and are stuck writing puff pieces and managing someone's twitter account.

      The bigger problem is that the people who review your resume are fundamentally useless and are stuck writing puff pieces and managing someone's twitter account.

    31. Re:LMFTFY by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      its a network application that uses SNMPv1 or v2c.

      (sorry, very geeky joke)

      Better than the article.

    32. Re:LMFTFY by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      bad website, bad. sit, no bone for you.

      Too late... We are already boned...

    33. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that this is a puff piece. Yvonne is only doing her job, such as it is. Still; SlashDot could have made a better editorial choice here.

      I suggest to DICE, that they would help all of us a lot if they would post intelligent, far-reaching research into technical fields, that define skilled technical labor needs, trends and employers. They should also find a way to tell the truth somehow, about employment agencies, company HR departments, advancement opportunities at most companies, and how major companies behave toward their Engineering and IT staffs. We don't need trivial advice about our resumes.

      I suggest to SlashDot, that they should do the same. Most of us work as employees. We really can't control the decisions our employers make. Do some goddam research into working conditions, salaries, job security and specific needs developing in the industry. Go lighter on the gossip.

    34. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://news.ycombinator.com/

    35. Re:LMFTFY by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      But the "." is way on the other side of the keyboard.

      Sincerely,
            Dvorak Typist

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    36. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the "." is way on the other side of the keyboard.

      Sincerely, Dvorak Typist

      Twat.

    37. Re:LMFTFY by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      What else is there to go to? Reddit?

      Between The Register and Torrent Freak, you will get most of the good stories on slashdot, and a day or two early!

      It's not the stories that make slahsdot worth visiting, it's the comments.

      Getting tech or any other type of news on the internet is hardly a serious challenge.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    38. Re:LMFTFY by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The other thing to do is start blogging. When you see something you want to comment on, you put it on a damned blog instead of posting a comment.

      That's like masturbating into a sock instead of having hot group sex.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    39. Re:LMFTFY by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I recently updated my sig! You should check it out :)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    40. Re:LMFTFY by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      and Yvonne hunni you do know that a big uk jobs site ( brand leader) got Panda'd by google Two weeks ago for far less than what you are doing here your risking destroying slash dots value here.

    41. Re:LMFTFY by Inda · · Score: 1

      You'll keep coming back for the same reason as me - the hot chicks. I'm only here to meet hot chicks.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    42. Re:LMFTFY by markfeffer · · Score: 2

      OK, this is just too good an opening line to pass up: I'm one of the useless people who writes the job news and career advice for Dice. (Actually, I'm probably worse than that, since I EDIT the stuff from Dice.) We're really trying to write good stuff here. Yvonne's job is to try to get more people to ask us questions about work and job-hunting, either on Dice or Slashdot. What we write isn't advertorial or a customer puff piece, I promise. We keep the sales/marketing/business people pretty far away from the editorial team, so we can write pretty much what we want. I'm not saying we don't screw it up some time, but we try to write things that are helpful. (Which is, actually, an invitation to tell me about what we can do better, or what we should stop screwing up.) Personally, I think the problem with almost every career story -- whether it's posted on Dice or somewhere else -- is that it can't apply to every person and every situation. I still haven't figured out how to make that more clear, but finding work is so granular it's hard to avoid. Anyway, I just wanted to jump in and tell you where we're coming from. I know I'm new here, but like I said to someone else, all I can ask is that my word for this, and give us a chance to show you what we can do. Thanks for listening.

    43. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark, the problem isn't with you or Yvonne. I suspect it's with the manager of the person you guys report to. He's a marketing guy who lives in Palo Alto, drives a BMW 7-Series, works two days a week, has two kids in private montessorri schools, thinks he can do your job better than you do, is cocksure he is invincible, thinks consumers are rubes, and is still proud of what a plugged-in guy he is. He set the wrong-headed policy you guys are all following.

      Dice paid a brazillian dollars for /., not because of the news it displays or because of CT's negotiating prowess, but because of the knowledgeable, discriminating community of technical opinion leaders that /. was able to collect together over the years. Individually we might be somewhat rube-like; but collectively, we are worth ten times what your HR Department boys paid for us. You don't want to fumble the ball here.

      Elsewhere in this thread, I listed some stuff Dice might do, that would be useful here. In a nutshell; do some actual intelligent, visionary research into industry trends and skills needs looking into the future. Publish for free, some of the stuff that you charge employers for elsewhere.

    44. Re:LMFTFY by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha, You RTFA! /Nelson

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    45. Re:LMFTFY by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I can summarize /.s job hunting wisdom, having been here a while.

      1. Never trust an HR drone, recruiter or anyone who works for dice. For that matter never trust anyone.

      2. The correct answer to 'What's your biggest weakness?' is 'Giving stupid answers to stupid questions'

      3. When given a non-disclosure/non-compete to sign the right thing to do is scrawl 'I don't agree' on the signature line.

      4. The only good jobs you will ever get are through your personal network. You have to endrun the HR twits.

      5. Job interviews are a two way street. Walk away before they become a resume stain.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re:LMFTFY by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Audi A8, but other then that spot on analysis. Except we're not worth shit. Dice are chumps for buying this dump.

      The only way dice can make money on /. is by tracking slackers IP numbers back and snitching us out to our respective HR departments.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    47. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your fortune cookie says: RSI awaits you

    48. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all well and good, but what matters is this: how big are her jugs?

    49. Re:LMFTFY by metaforest · · Score: 1

      +1 informative.... WTF are my mod points!

    50. Re:LMFTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thirty years' experience to the contrary calls OP's claims into question.

      One of the 'suggestions' in the Forbes article cited by the Dice twit was to NOT copy the exact phrasing of the job ad - not to copy the ad's phrasing, but to NOT copy the ad's phrasing. Twit-meister suggests you copy. I question OP's reading comprehension.

      (That word-for-word copying DOES work when filling out grant applications, however - or so I have read.)

      Another of twit-meister's suggestions is to 'tailor' your resume to the job. That's bullshit. She's asking you to twist yourself into the pretzel shape most easily digested by the hiring manager, to help your recruiter 'sell' you. But who really knows what appeals to another person? Not an underpaid, inexperienced recruiter.

      And isn't that, fundamentally, prostitution? You're not selling your client the sharp power tool he is looking for. You are selling your client a pleasurable, ego-rewarding experience. When he stops being happy, he will throw away the tool that you tricked him into buying, and cry for another one.

      Y'know, I've been known to apply to a dozen positions in the same day, and I've been doing that for thirty years, through upturns and downturns and recessions and inflationary periods, too. I've been doing this so long, my first resumes were hand-typed, and xeroxed, and physically mailed.

      Even then, I was unconventional - I'd cut out every ad for every computer-related job I was applying to - remember the San Francisco Examiner, and the Sunday want ads? - and paste them all to a single sheet of paper ... make as many copies of this 'cover sheet' as I did of the resume ... staple each 'cover letter' and resume together ... circle, or highlite, the specific job I was applying to ... put a stamp on, and mail it.

      My 'cover letter' was really clear - even though I did not write, or type, a single word. My cover letter was, essentially, a snapshot of the Bay Area computer job market, as represented by that Sunday's 'wanted' ads.

      My cover letter said that there were 20 or 30 positions being advertised that I was qualified for, that there were 20 or 30 positions that I was applying to, and THIS - the circled one - was why I was sending them my resume.

      Nothing else. Just a sheet of ads, with one circled ... and my resume. Very graphic.

      It cut right through the mustard. It was honest. I did not lie. I did not cut-and-paste cleverly generic phrases. I kept it simple, and straightforward.

      And my method effectively filtered out all the pompous assholes who wanted me to spend 30 minutes sweating over *their* perfect cover letter for *their* specific job.

      Now, you're telling me that you want me to customize the resume, TOO?

      I've heard that crap from too many young punks who don't know anything and are still wet behind the ears to give it more than a picosecond's thought.

      If I was up for a directorship in a corporation I might do that. Y'know, with a 500K salary. Nothing less would motivate me to grovel like that.

      PS: I didn't appreciate your deleting my comments about Flickr, either.

    51. Re:LMFTFY by Sorthum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a few unfortunate websites I was keying in out of muscle memory. I found that the solution ultimately was to add an entry to /etc/hosts until the habit faded. It may come time to do that with Slashdot if this crap keeps up.

    52. Re:LMFTFY by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Since it seems that this article is going to get more scrutiny from the current Slashdot overlords than the typical article, this seems like as good a place as any to make feature requests. So, as long as we're making requests to bring back old stuff (although the feature you're asking for isn't actually that old), how about a search feature that works? Aside from a way to search old articles (an actual advanced search rather than the pathetic excuse we have now), it would be nice to be able to search your own comments, or even just navigate them in a sane way. I've been posting here for a long, long time, so having to navigate my old comments by hitting "next" a few thousand times is really, really lame. It's a pity that all of my oldest comments were AC since I didn't bother to get an account for a long time, so I'll never be able to search them. On the other hand, as it stands right now, unless Slashdot is willing to hand out dumps of its database, I can't search them now anyway.

      That made me think a bit. This page takes up about 1.7 megabytes, but that's including all the markup and images and so forth. The actual comments don't take up more than about 140 kilobytes. Going by yesterdays total, I'll estimate 30 articles per day, and around 6000 days for the existence of Slashdot. That would be about 25 gigabytes. Of course, it's text, so 10 to 1 non-lossy compression would probably be quite possible. That means that you should be able to fit the entirety of Slashdot on one DVD.

  2. HWGA by drcheap · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yup...here we go again.

    F U dice.com, F U.

    1. Re:HWGA by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seconded.

      Still, may as well try to make the best of it. Joey Coumeau wrote some pretty funny job applications:

      http://www.asofterworld.com/oqarchive.php

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    2. Re:HWGA by SomePgmr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Right now there's a slashdot editor yelling across the office, "See? I tried to tell you this was a bad idea."

    3. Re:HWGA by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      You could always offer to pay for the site instead of the advertisements. That and you don't have to click the dice link. I appreciated the forbes link even if it wasn't the best thing I've read today.

    4. Re:HWGA by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Still, may as well try to make the best of it. Joey Coumeau wrote some pretty funny job applications:

      http://www.asofterworld.com/oqarchive.php

      Thanks a lot for that link. It's making my evening.

      BTW, I need to insert this string in the thread:
      fuck you dice.com
      Also:
      fuck dice.com

      (because F U sometimes just isn't enough).

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re:HWGA by _anomaly_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What? Posting a summary on slashdot of a Dice.com fluff piece from June 2011 isn't a good idea?!

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:HWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm here for the jokes as much as anything else, so this policy is fine with me. The comments so far are cracking me up. More assbaggery and soon dice douches!

    7. Re:HWGA by islisis · · Score: 2

      As a paying member, I can assure you this advertisement is still well and truly in my face.

    8. Re:HWGA by dubbreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That actually made me laugh out loud. The sad thing is that most likely reflects reality.

      You have got to be pretty out of touch to think doing that is a good idea. It's not one of those things that "looks good on paper" then takes a nose dive. It was a bad call from the get go.

      Of course it could be worse. Every front page story could be a shoddy summary and link to a Dice.com "article". Personally I'm still reeling over the How to use a Linux Virtual Private Server "article". What's worse is they moved the "article" from Dice.com to slashdot itself to, I dunno, give it more credibility?

      "Hey, this old fluff piece we wrote has something about Linux! We should post a story about it!"

      "Shoot, they didn't like that it's a Dice.com article"

      "I KNOW.. we'll move it to the slashdot domain.. that way it'll be credible!!!"
      "Awesome idea!!!"
      *back pats all around*

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:HWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when the people who care about news for nerds and stuff that matters move on to a more interesting news site, all that we'll be left with is 4chan without the pictures.

      Yvonne Lee is bad and she should feel bad.

    10. Re:HWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Years-late articles and paid slashvertizements are a time-honored tradition that dates way back before the Dice acquisition. The only thing that would make this even more "Classic Slashdot" is if they posted a duplicate of this summary in another three hours. Oh, and several obvious typos in the summary that the "editors" didn't catch.

    11. Re:HWGA by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Funny, the "paying member" icon seems to be missing from your name. Might want to file a bug report. But point taken.

    12. Re:HWGA by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      I'm not following the links. What is dice.com?

    13. Re:HWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not following the links. What is dice.com?

      You're already there.

      http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/18/dice-holdings-buys-slashdot-sourceforge-and-freecode-from-geeknet/

    14. Re:HWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that, much appreciated!

    15. Re:HWGA by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is dice.com?
      It is a site that lures job seekers in under the false pretense of having jobs available, then aggregates the information and sells it to advertisers who are apparently too dumb to realize that unemployed people are not a great market.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    16. Re:HWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my favourite bit from that techcrunch link:

      "Dice has been talking about building content and user engagement to be top of mind and more integral to professionals doing work, and if you think about SourceForge and Slashdot, it’s about user engagement to help you do your job,” Michael Durney, SVP, finance and CFO of Dice Holdings, told me today in an interview. “We started to build on our own [content business] but here we have two sites that do it very well."

    17. Re:HWGA by Desler · · Score: 1

      Even better is when the editors actually do try to edit and then end up adding in their own typos and shitty grammar.

    18. Re:HWGA by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      Not really; payments appear to have been broken since dice took over.

    19. Re:HWGA by Common+Joe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      TFA is really "very helpful". Let's review:

      1) Use Industry Standard Job Titles: Hey! Great idea! Which one should I use? Programmer? Software developer? Software engineer? Software designer? Coder? Thank goodness it's standardized in the I.T. world!

      2) Tie Your Your Work to Business Results: What another fantastic idea. Because I know exactly how much my programming earns or saves a multi-million dollar business. I know that because managers always give detailed feedback to peons like me. Also, most of what I do is very interesting. Like "Write a brain-dead GUI that will fire off several database stored procedures in the proper order." Wow! I nailed that business result and business are going to be so impressed with me! I also am appreciative that I can talk openly about what I do in my business. For instance, I [CENSORSED] and [RETRACTED] just the other day using [SOME TECHNOLOGY] and [ANOTHER TECHNOLOGY]. I sleep well knowing my business won't come after me for talking about what they consider business secrets.

      3) Have the Key Words Needed to Get Hits From the Software: In other words, I need to be just like everyone else so that I can get picked for a job out of thousands of candidates. What a fantastic idea!

      Thank you, DICE! Your article that is nearly two years old that got posted on the front page of Slashdot is the best thing I've read in a long time. I have no doubt these pearls of wisdom you've given me and all of my fellow Slashdotters will help all of us find our next fulfilling job!

    20. Re:HWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've taken up reading old slashdot stories from the turn of the century.

    21. Re:HWGA by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Funny

      A reply explaining Dice (somewhat snarkily, I admit, but true) to a question about Dice on a site owned by Dice in an article which is an advertisement for Dice is modded off-topic. All hail the new Dice overlords!

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  3. Again? by olip85 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another link to dice.com? That must be a great site! No time to comment! I'm heading over there RIGHT NOW!!

    1. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know what you're thinking, and they don't sell actual dice.

    2. Re:Again? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Actually the summary says "I think you're even more unlikely to get a job if you do some of the things on this list." pointing to Forbes, where the list on Forbes is of people that were all hired. Quite the opposite of the summary in fact...

    3. Re:Again? by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Funny
      Isn't that the official website of celebrated comedian and all-round nice guy Andrew "Dice" Clay? I mean, they can't have the domain name for a trademarked person and not be the official site, can they?

      Someone who is a libertarian ought to complain to the UN/WIPO/ICANN/whatever and try to get it taken away.

    4. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, I doubt search engines are capable of picking up on sarcasm, so I'd just like to point out that dice.com is terrible, and Yvonne Lee produces nothing but drivel.

    5. Re:Again? by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      See this is your problem right here, slashdot users. Instead of just reading the summary/header and commenting - you've decided to first RTFA. Maybe you even clicked on all the links the summary.

      If you dumb asses would have read the comments first, you would instantly known it was a fluff piece / disguised advertising. But NOOO, you have to try to be knowledgeable about the subject before deciding you're qualified to comment. Well that'll learn ya for next time - *always* read the comments first!

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    6. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naah, dice.com does not actually sell dice, but think of them more like Vegas. They take all your personal information in exchange for the hope... yes, the hope, you might get employment.

      If you are a seriously seeking a job, you are afraid to set your worst foot forward by witholding requested information as you do not want to come across as aloof and hard to get along with. But then, you have no idea of who is actually using that info for other purposes and making off with a hell of a lot of moolah for collecting and organizing information for yet more leeches hell bent on monetizing your problems and taking advantage of your situation.

      Sometimes, it seems the only solution to a layoff is to go onto welfare - usually a life sentence, as our country is so wealthy it can simply print up money to pay foreigners to do what you would have done.

    7. Re:Again? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I know what you're thinking, and they don't sell actual dice.

      I assumed it was some sort of online gambling site.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. It All Started Last Year ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    CEO of Dice: How can we make ourselves appear to be an authority figure on hiring.
    Yvonne Lee: Well, really all you need is eyeballs that people will automatically use to read whatever you put in front of them.
    CEO of Dice: Yes, but how do we do that?
    Yvonne Lee: Um, you could purchase a tech blog site like Slashdot.org.
    CEO of Dice: "Slashdot"? Sounds violent ... would that work?
    Yvonne Lee: Yes, everything that goes up on there is widely regarded as fact by millions of idiots every day.
    CEO of Dice: Very well, one slash dot dot org, please! *holds up $137 in small bills and drops some change on the table*

    1. Re:It All Started Last Year ... by PuZZleDucK · · Score: 1

      Surely /. would cost "$1337.00"

      --
      Can a person program a new solution to a problem? Why should anyone be able to stop such a thing? -Richard Stallman
  5. Dice.com by Swampash · · Score: 5, Funny

    After study a couple of of the weblog posts on your internet site now, and I genuinely like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site list and will probably be checking back soon. I certainly will be recommend dice.com to all friends and good family.

    News for nerds, stuff that matters.

  6. Can someone point me in the right direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I need to know where /. moved to. I didn't realize this url was now the Dice.com blog.

    1. Re:Can someone point me in the right direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try here.

    2. Re:Can someone point me in the right direction? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Reddit.com!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Can someone point me in the right direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse. They could be posting stuff from lifehacker.

  7. Reasons you're not getting good candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I once heard advice to use the exact wording found in the ad when placing your keywords."

    Okay, an anecdote "I once heard" posted anonymously on /. is not exactly a scientific survey, but the intent is quite clear: candidates should be carefully tailoring their resumes to HR's total "I don't give a fuck" attitude.

    But. If that's how a company is hiring, that company is going to be fucked before too long. If HR doesn't give a fuck and there's not enough leadership from the people who count to get HR to give a fuck, the company is fucked.

    And, yeah, if you've been unemployed for a while, at some point a paycheck is a paycheck until you're stable. But you don't want to *start* your job search thinking that way.

    1. Re:Reasons you're not getting good candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got top 10% viewed profile on linkedin just being honest, once in a while, putting myself a job title of the line
      '.Net Fanatic'

    2. Re:Reasons you're not getting good candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, pretty much everyone I know got one of those top %10 viewed linkedin profile thingies. It doesnt mean dick.

  8. Why the Dice.com hate? by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 1

    Not that I'm in the job market or even looking, but it didn't take long to figure out people hate these guys. Just wondering why.

    1. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not that I'm in the job market or even looking, but it didn't take long to figure out people hate these guys. Just wondering why.

      Because we come here to read the news, not to have some parent-company advertisement misrepresented to us as if it were news.

      CmdrTaco knew his audience; /.'s new masters at Dice.com don't seem to have figured it out quite yet.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by niado · · Score: 2

      Not that I'm in the job market or even looking, but it didn't take long to figure out people hate these guys. Just wondering why.

      In short, Dice is currently the Slashdot corporate overlord. Hatred is obligatory.

    3. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by swanzilla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They bought /. from Geeknet and drivel like this now shows up here.

    4. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by admdrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They (now) own Slashdot, so submissions like these are more ad than substance (see: slashvertisement). This is also a bullshit article, which is kind of indicative of the rest of the stuff coming from dice.com - it's specifically tailored to recruiter-based interviews only, something (in my experience) that are actually very rare. This is essentially SEO for recruiters, and isn't really that constructive.

    5. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, to me it's like the ad in the top right corner of the page. So what? They've gotta make money.

      People detest change.

    6. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      This is essentially SEO for recruiters, and isn't really that constructive.

      Makes me wonder if they only bought Slashdot for its pagerank.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by Tarsir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, drivel like this has been showing up for Slashdot for years. I didn't notice it was a paid piece until I read the comments complaining about it. The problem is two--fold. First is a matter of principal--rather than get their drivel on Slashdot through users submissions, like all the other drivel, they're using their position as parent company to do so.

      Second is the very real possibility that paid Dice.com drivel will increase in volume until there is nothing left but Dice.com drivel pieces. Then the few genuinely good stories will be gone.

    8. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've gotta make money? So what?

      People have no respect for Slashdot users.

    9. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by FranklinWebber · · Score: 1

      > it's like the ad in the top right corner of the page

      I agree.

      > So what? They've gotta make money.

      I already paid them money, by subscribing, so that I'm not shown ads.
      Now they're showing me an "article" that, as you said, is like an ad.

      > People detest change.

      I detest not getting what I believe I paid for.

    10. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good, hatred generator powering up in 3, 2, 1, ...

    11. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if they only bought Slashdot for its pagerank.

      If only there were a way for a large group of people to lower a site's pagerank.

    12. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      CmdrTaco knew his audience; /.'s new masters at Dice.com don't seem to have figured it out quite yet.

      Slashvertisements were certainly common at certain points during CmdrTaco's reign of terror.

      Just add dice.com to your hosts file (/adblocker/whatever) and be done with it.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    13. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      They've got to make money, I don't mind if they put their ad on the page. I don't like these stories though, first of all the stories themselves are pure bullshit. Second it feels like Faux News - Fairly Purchased News

    14. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you buy an entity because you want to make money from it, it's probably not a good idea to alienate almost all of that entity's existing customers. Especially if it's something like a website for which there are hundreds or thousands of immediately available alternatives.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I already paid them money, by subscribing, so that I'm not shown ads.

      I don't subscribe, but can disable ads anyway (as an option, not by using AdBlock). I wonder how long that will last?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Why the Dice.com hate? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      CmdrTaco knew his audience; /.'s new masters at Dice.com don't seem to have figured it out quite yet.

      Slashvertisements were certainly common at certain points during CmdrTaco's reign of terror.

      Well, sure, but at least he knew to be shady about it.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  9. Reasons boil down to by Alopex · · Score: 2

    HR drones not having the slightest clue

    1. Re:Reasons boil down to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We try but tech managers give crap documentation to work from...
      Garbage in...

  10. i for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new dice overlords

  11. To: slashdot-domo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unsubscribe dl-slashdot-dice-bullshite /me

  12. Any way to filter out these ads? by SlappyMcInty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is there a way to filter out 'stories' based on their tags? I.e. "ad" ?

    1. Re:Any way to filter out these ads? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      This "story" was posted by Slashdot Staff, not a specific "Editor".

      - Mouse over your username in the top left and click "Options" from the dropdown menu.
      - Go to the "Exclusions" tab and put a check in the box next to "Slashdot Staff" and accept changes.

      You should be good to go. If they start posting under other editors, I'd probably be inclined to just sack the site off for something else. *Cough* Signature *Cough*

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  13. Sadly Enough by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From experience I know that one of the largest employers in the USA actually gives you a much better shot at a job if you do include the same key phrases in your resume. The mass crush of resumes that come in for any job opening requires that the HR drones put everything through an automated filter or three. If your resume doesn't pass those filters nothing else matters because no one is going to read it.

    1. Re:Sadly Enough by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 2

      Or, you can be bluntly honest.

    2. Re:Sadly Enough by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      Or drop the name of an important and probably well-connected uncle.

    3. Re:Sadly Enough by garutnivore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In case it need be said...

      The reason for filters is that for every candidate who actually reads the job posting and is sending an application that shows that the candidate's experience and skills intersect with what the posting is looking for, there are dozens of morons whose method of applying is spray and pray, or do not know that the people reading applications are not mindreaders.

    4. Re:Sadly Enough by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The mass crush of resumes that come in for any job opening
      Ha! We posted for a mid-level java developer, and we have received 8 resumes over a two month period, all of them either entry level developers in another language a year or so out of school or who are currently in school hoping to become a java (or probably any other language) developer.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:Sadly Enough by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Or drop the name of an important and probably well-connected uncle.

      If you have one of those I doubt you'll be submitting your resume to HR as part of the "interview" process.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Sadly Enough by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I know that one of the largest employers in the USA actually gives you a much better shot at a job if you do include the same key phrases in your resume.

      If I worked in HR I'd throw those out; there's a good chance they're bullshitters.

      If I was feeling particularly evil I'd put fictional things in the requirement, or at least intentionally misspell things. Those would definitely go straight to the big round file.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Creativity? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    The main point of the article seems to be that you should deliver your resume in some fancy shape or form.

  15. No Pink Bunnies?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder I can't get an interview...

  16. Slashdot is collapsing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RUN!

  17. Please just stop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wish they'd just stick to maintaining the side bar with the job listings. "herp derp shameless plug shameless plug herp derp jobs jobs resume herp derp" isn't really interesting to any of us. If I wanted resume writing tips I'd just do a Google search for it on my own time. Here's hoping there's a way to set filters on the story submissions ... I haven't heard about people doing that since the Jon Katz days...

  18. This is anti-productive. by digitalvengeance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Prior to the recent rash of Dice.com slashvertisements, I held a very positive opinion of both Dice.com and Slashdot. With each new thinly veiled attempt to drive traffic to Dice, I lose a little bit of respect for each.

    If Dice wants to put ads on slashdot, just put ads on slashdot. Stop running fake stories that just diminish a site that has spent a long time earning a loyal following.

    --
    How many roads must a man walk down? 42.
    1. Re:This is anti-productive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I held a very positive opinion of ... Slashdot

      De gustibus non est disputandum

    2. Re:This is anti-productive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they've got a problem now - this is what they bought slashdot FOR. someone in management thought that they could do something like this, which was why they bought /. in the first place. if they don't do it, then they've bought /. for no reason

  19. So, basically... by eksith · · Score: 2

    Don't be Florida on your resume. Next...

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
  20. "some of the things on the list" by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is one of the reason I despise the industry and the lore that surrounds it: the ostensible "professionalism", the bullshitting, the going to the job interview in suit and tie (what the fuck for, nobody knows), the total lack of colour and creativity, the need to use boilerplate and keywords...

    And the fact that "some of the things on the list" are considered outlandish and not conducive to getting a job. I found humorous every single item on that list, and would considered the candidate to have an advantage, exactly for having a sense of humor, rather than a disadvantage in getting a job.

    In academia, where I work now, things are somewhat similar but not as bad as in the industry, and there's a measure of nuttiness and humor you can get away with.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Anrego · · Score: 1

      My experience has been that the HR experience of large companies seldom matches the actual working environment. Getting through the bullshit sucks, but once you do you might find a great working atmosphere.

      Smaller shops where you get interviewed by the owner are usually (but not always) lighter on the BS. A suit/tie is usually still a good idea though! Its a silly custom but why fight it (unless you are ready to really fight it/make some kind of point).

    2. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Kittenman · · Score: 2

      This is one of the reason I despise the industry and the lore that surrounds it: the ostensible "professionalism", the bullshitting, the going to the job interview in suit and tie (what the fuck for, nobody knows), the total lack of colour and creativity, the need to use boilerplate and keywords...

      And the fact that "some of the things on the list" are considered outlandish and not conducive to getting a job. I found humorous every single item on that list, and would considered the candidate to have an advantage, exactly for having a sense of humor, rather than a disadvantage in getting a job.

      In academia, where I work now, things are somewhat similar but not as bad as in the industry, and there's a measure of nuttiness and humor you can get away with.

      Of course you realize that you lost some street cred here by going to the link and reading the list?

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wearing a suit and tie to an interview for a tech role is definitely not a good idea (here in silicon valley at least). Maybe for a management role yeah, but otherwise its often taken as an indication that the candidate is inclined towards form over function. Or that they just got out of university and got bad advice as to how to dress to an interview.

    4. Re:"some of the things on the list" by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly I've seen plenty of HR types who look at resumés through that lens. I've done some resumé selecting (and subsequent interviewing) as well; my last employer put great store in letting their consultants rather than HR do the better part of selecting potential hires. What I looked for: creativity (if applicable to the job, which it almost always was), relevant work experience (yes we actually call your references, and bring your diplomas too), outstanding achievements in and outside the job (be prepared to be thoroughly questioned on those), or obvious turn-offs (inappropriate comments, excessive spelling/grammatical errors). What I overlooked: the occasional spelling error, not conforming to the standard typography or format for resumés, not showing up in a suit (though one should look at least somewhat presentable), mentioning odd activities or hobbies. Wearing a suit, communicating in a professional manner, speaking the lingo... those are things we can teach you if you're an otherwise clever, competent and motivated person.

      By the way, if I am ever asked to interview someone for an HR position, I'd give them a nice mix of resumes of people I've interviewed before, asking them to make a motivated selection. I seriously doubt miss Lee would pass muster...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:"some of the things on the list" by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      A suit/tie is usually still a good idea though! Its a silly custom but why fight it

      I just cannot stand bullshit. It's a fortuitous coincidence that I don't have to take that much anymore, now that I'm in academia.

      I just cannot fathom going to a job interview in a suit anymore - I couldn't live with me anymore after that. To me it's throwing all my dignity down the wazoo.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the 15 or so year I worked as a programmer in England a suit, shirt, and tie were the dress all the time, not just for interviews.

    7. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Maybe depends on where you're from. In California it doesn't fly, but you're still expected to not have just a tee shirt and jeans. However on east coast it is still expected most places. Doesn't need to be a great suit though.

      The whole point really is that it needs to look like you care about getting the job. If they're looking at many candidates they're probably going to pass on the person who acts as if the interview is a waste of time, and they're definitely going to pass on the person who thinks he is so awesome that conventions can be thrown out.

      I don't wear a suit, I don't wear a tie. I haven't worn a suit to the last few interviews. I am not a pro-suit person. I am a slacker. I will wear a suit to a wedding or funeral of course. However I have great difficulty understanding the mind set that wearing a suit would be throwing away dignity. Is this some sort of British style worry that you will be a class traitor if you put on a suit? What's the big deal? No one will laugh at you, no one will think less of you (no one that matters anyway), no one will mistake you for a tool.

    8. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time getting worked up over an article of clothing.

      Yes I'm sure there is good reason to be given what it represents and the arbitrary requirement to wear one.. but it's a piece of clothing you have to wear for like an hour or two to get past someone you will likely not see all that often (how often do you deal with HR after you get hired..).

      If they told me I had to "look professional" while at my desk working, damn right I'd fight that... but I can induldge a silly tradition to get through an interview.

      Also, hate BS so went to academia?

    9. Re:"some of the things on the list" by anubi · · Score: 1

      I have posted a lot here on Slashdot. Lots of rants.

      I did visit Dice.com after my layoff from the aerospace industry, but in all honesty, I had a hard time perceiving Dice.com as being a serious site, as it seemed keyed more to bureaucratic needs of collecting information rather than actually connecting me with someone who could benefit from my capabilities and experience. Here I am trying to hold an intelligent technical discussion about electronic design with a HR type? I might as well be a molecular biochemist trying to discuss DNA coding with a construction foreman.

      It did not take long before I realized they were "fishing with dynamite". They gave me little indication I had anything of value to offer - as they were after people with very specific certs and previous experience... bottom fishing with a net ... trying to find the cheapest solution for filling a opening for yet someone else. I am not good at that kind of salesmanship. Neither am I good at writing resumes with wording reminiscent of television ads tailored to sell subperforming goods for a premium price.

      I fail to see Dice.com as a viable employment site. All I can say is just do your thing and try to hang around other people who are also doing your thing. Eventually, they will need some help and you will be on the top of the invite list.

      My thing is analog circuit design ( power, CPU interface, microvolt and picoamp stuff ), microcontrollers ( mostly now all arduino but some u/COS ), and of all things... refrigeration. My employment came from personal contact with others doing this kind of stuff. I do not think anyone on Dice could probably even discuss thermal energy transfer to shaft work, or how to guard a picoampere measurement circuit with me. It is frustrating to me to deal with it. Extremely frustrating.

      I figure they are more of a bunch of power suits and ties, lots of money, and no need of the guy with the tools.

      I hate suits with a purple passion, mostly because when I am wearing one, I am so concerned with messing it up that I do not get any work done. I can't even bend my arms properly or sit comfortably, and have to be aware of every snagging object. For me, they are a ostentatious display of having far more wealth than is needed. Kinda like the guy who buys the fancy little car to get to work, but can't take a load of tools in it for fear the tools will scratch it up. Or can't take it to the beach.

      If there has been anything in my observation that has ruined companies, it was when they were overfunded to such an extent they started hiring people to fill openings for other people.

      I insist on talking directly to the person I will be working for, not his gofer-guy. I hate the damn politics I have to go through in the Corporate environment.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    10. Re:"some of the things on the list" by ApplePy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I might as well be a molecular biochemist trying to discuss DNA coding with a construction foreman.

      Okay, I'm a corner case, but....

      Careful with your insults there. I was once a construction foreman myself. I grew up in the business, am good at it, and enjoy the smell of sawdust. I'm in IT now because construction doesn't pay much and has too many foreigners. I'll still build my own house one day.

      But I assure you, I can discuss all sorts of scientific minutiae with you, oh great genius who has never stooped to manual labor. You might have a skill or two I don't... I've got hundreds you don't, I promise you.

      I'll never forget the time, when I was a 17-year-old lowly construction grunt, listening to some classical music in my truck whilst eating my lunch... the foreman came over to talk to me, and asked... "is that Debussy?" It was.

      Nerds don't always come in Dockers, dude.

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    11. Re:"some of the things on the list" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      the going to the job interview in suit and tie (what the fuck for, nobody knows)

      Companies like to know they are employing adults who are capable of making a small effort to look professional, as it is just barely possible the future employee may have to meet real people, even customers, in their job, and not spend ten hours a day in boxer shorts and a vest staring at a screen.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:"some of the things on the list" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Wearing a suit and tie to an interview for a tech role is definitely not a good idea (here in silicon valley at least). Maybe for a management role yeah, but otherwise its often taken as an indication that the candidate is inclined towards form over function. Or that they just got out of university and got bad advice as to how to dress to an interview.

      All it amounts to is that if the cultural norm is to wear a suit and tie for a job interview, you wear a suit and tie to a job interview. If the cultural norm is to wear jeans and a t-shirt, you wear jeans and a t-shirt.

      I love how Americans can cheerfully work 80 hour weeks, but moan about having to dress smartly.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:"some of the things on the list" by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Insightful

      However I have great difficulty understanding the mind set that wearing a suit would be throwing away dignity. Is this some sort of British style worry that you will be a class traitor if you put on a suit?

      If you're applying for a well paid job as a programmer at the sort of company that expects you to wear a suit and tie for an interview, you're probably not exactly a revolutionary class warrior to start with, are you?

      The simple truth of the matter is that nerds like to think they're superior to all those boring suit-wearing corporate drones who work for the same company, and the jeans/t-shirt are some sort of geeky badge of difference to show you're not a manager.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:"some of the things on the list" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If they told me I had to "look professional" while at my desk working, damn right I'd fight that.

      Why do so many people here have that attitude? You're being paid to work, you're a professional, not a student hanging out in their dorm room. Do you fight against the fact that you can't sit around all day wanking to anime? That you can't get drunk, throw stuff at your co-workers and call them whores and bitches?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:"some of the things on the list" by hackertourist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, we think that wearing a suit is uncomfortable, expensive and inefficient. It also doesn't accomplish anything.
      The suit represents everything that's wrong with concepts like fashion. The tie, for instance: it's a useless piece of clothing that doesn't do anything except get in the way, and hasn't done anything for hundreds of years.

      Yet it's still seen as an essential item of clothing by people who care for appearance over practicality, and who see nothing wrong with judging people on their appearance. They're the ones who think they're superior. We're just being practical.

    16. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...it's a useless piece of clothing that doesn't do anything except..."

      And here i though it was tool to hang myself as last resort to dealing with asshat superiors who never let facts stand in the way of their feel-good initiatives.

    17. Re:"some of the things on the list" by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      If you're applying for a well paid job as a programmer at the sort of company that expects you to wear a suit and tie for an interview, you're probably not exactly a revolutionary class warrior to start with, are you?

      What bullshit is this? Highly talented and/or educated people cannot be revolutionaries? Revolutionaries are typically very highly educated characters.

      The simple truth of the matter is that nerds like to think they're superior to all those boring suit-wearing corporate drones who work for the same company, and the jeans/t-shirt are some sort of geeky badge of difference to show you're not a manager.

      That said, I in particular have witnessed those scumbag corporate psychopaths that like to call themselves "managers", and if by not wearing a suit I won't be mistaken for one, that's fucking great!

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    18. Re:"some of the things on the list" by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      but I can induldge a silly tradition to get through an interview.

      Look, I am not judging you for your choices. In fact, I was exactly like you, years ago. What changed? I worked (and am still working) as a scientist and that means poor salary but lots of fun. I also got older and realized that if you don't have fun, life is not much worth living. There's just too little of it to spend it doing something you don't like or in a place you don't like. And for me, working in a company that requires me to wear a suit for the job interview would mean working in a place I wouldn't enjoy. So if the only reason a company won't hire me is because I didn't wear a suit at their shitty job interview, then it's for the best for me.

      Maybe I managed to put my thoughts in a form that is more sensible and understandable.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    19. Re:"some of the things on the list" by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Why do so many people here have that attitude? You're being paid to work, you're a professional,

      Some people have that attitude because they don't believe that money should buy EVERYTHING. I should be paid to do my job, not to look a certain way or to wear certain things. Those things go a step too far in my mind. To me it is insulting and degrading that an employer should have such power over his employees. I mean, I'm a really kind, understanding and friendly person, but fuck that!

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    20. Re:"some of the things on the list" by sapgau · · Score: 1

      From experience, if you are applying for a job on the West Coast you will look more believable if you do NOT wear a suit.
      The rest of the world most likely will expect you to dress up as usual.

    21. Re:"some of the things on the list" by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Why do so many people here have that attitude?

      It's mainly because I find business attire uncomfortable while doing actual work. My job involves a fair amount of designing and review, which involves a lot of thinking, which is hard to do while half my brain is focused on how uncomfortable a tie is.

      That combined with the fact that wearing a t-shirt isn't likely to negatively impact the quality of my work at all make restrictions on dress when not in a public facing position (beyond the basic "don't offend people" common courtesy) silly.

      You're being paid to work

      Money isn't everything when I consider a job. It's obviously the most visible component, however the benefits package, growth opportunities, and work environment also weight in. Mentally I picture it like those old "create character" screens from video games. If one value is low, the others have to be higher to compensate in order to get to the required number. Want me to wear a suit or deal with the customer (both things I hate) on a regular basis, it's going to cost you more money in salary or benifits. Want to pay me less? Gonna have to give me some nice office perks or up my vacation time or show me that you work on some really cool stuff or that your company might be the next google in 3 years.

      you're a professional

      .. with a valuable skill. You don't have to take what you're given and feel lucky you got that much. A little shopping around and negotiating means you get something you are much happier with. You still get bent over the barrel one way or the other, but if you've got some credit to your name at least you can have your choice of lube...

      not a student hanging out in their dorm room

      A lot of the really successful companies are trying to emulate this environment for a reason. People are creative when they are relaxed. Put me in a suit and stick me in a board room and my brain becomes useless.

    22. Re:"some of the things on the list" by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Also, if the social norm is to jump off a bridge, you should too.

  21. "Standard Job Title"? by CptNerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What the heck is a "standard job title" anyway? I've worked at 12 different companies in my nearly 30 years in software development, and never have I had the same "job title." I'm pretty sure my current job title is meaningless to anyone else looking to hire me, as would the dozen other job titles I've had be.

    Get back to me when the "industry" publishes a list of "standard job titles" and makes every company comply with it.

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    1. Re:"Standard Job Title"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 'standard' job title is beneficial for exactly this reason; "my current job title is meaningless to anyone else looking to hire me".

      If you are a 'Software Developer' that should be your title. If you are something that isn't comprehensible to anyone outside of your current company, it is USELESS for getting you a job. Even if you're the Senior Software Super-Dooper Management Developer Admin, 'Software Developer' or 'C Programmer' or 'Python Developer' seem like they would be more 'marketable' without being horse shit.

    2. Re:"Standard Job Title"? by Livius · · Score: 2

      I work in a department of about 50 people and the job titles of every single person across four levels of hierarchy are nearly identical.

    3. Re:"Standard Job Title"? by green1 · · Score: 2

      This is a problem I constantly face, I'm not actually 100% sure what my own job title is this week (or for that matter, what they call my department these days). I know it has changed at least a dozen times since I started this job, even though I haven't changed job positions. When talking to someone inside the company I use the slang abbreviation for my job title (that one hasn't changed in at least 15 years, though it might not make sense to anyone not familiar with the internal workings of the company) and when dealing with people outside the company I make up a generic one that describes what I actually do (I'll admit that if two different people ask me my job title an hour apart they may get different answers, but they'll both have a decent idea of what I do)

    4. Re:"Standard Job Title"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At my last job i built-out a RHEL cluster that ran xenU's for a mysql cluster and load-balanced web server(s). It was called the 'crapstack' of which I was said 'master'.

      After getting pink-slipped, my job application for 'linux sysadmin' got no traction so I used "virtual crapstack master" as my job title. Surprised that it got me a better response rate.

  22. PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please stop posting this wank.

    Thank you.

  23. Article Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fire Yvonne Lee and then periodically let us know what crazy real resume mistakes she is making and the reasons she is not getting a new job. Ruining Slashdot comes to mind...

  24. To Yvonne Lee from all slashdot readers, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since you didn't read my post from yesterday, here it is again: Please go fuck yourself. Seriously. Everybody here means it. That's all. Thank you.

    1. Re:To Yvonne Lee from all slashdot readers, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dear Anonymous Coward. Thanks for your comment. I read it and enjoyed it. In fact, I did follow your advice. After work I went home and got out the 15" DilBlastastic and did fuck myself. It was very enjoyable. I will be repeating the experience again this evening. Thanks for the comment and I'm glad you enjoy my work.

      Yours,

      Yvonne.

    2. Re:To Yvonne Lee from all slashdot readers, by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Quoted For Truth.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  25. Read an interesting tip... by Nexzus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...on another forum:

    Copy and paste the entire job description into a 1 pixel by 1 pixel box on your resume. Invisible to the naked eye, but parsers easily pick it up.

    Just make sure to watch the sites that parse and reformat for you (Monster, eg) when uploading.

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    1. Re:Read an interesting tip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so sure. Headhunters doing copy and paste will eventually manually dump it into some text field that is plain when emailing candidate data. What willl happen when they suddenly find expansions with text they don't recognize as yours? hacking come to mind. Nobody would like to be singled out as a "hacker" trying to force their way in, especially when they have no understanding of how benign that "abuse" is compared to the boogeyman in their minds. They might just lose their job for trying to get you yours.

  26. in summary... by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    Recruiters are too lazy to determine whether a person who's last position as "Enterprise Data Architect" where listed skills are scoping, implementing, and managing DB2, MS SQL, and Oracle instances requested by internal clients has the skills necessary for their company's "Database Administrator" position.

    I read this as "Do the work for HR/Recruiters, they're not intelligent enough to do it themselves".

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:in summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a bit worse than that, really. It's more like:

      HR people are not intelligent enough to parse your resume. Try to guess the wrong way they'll use to parse it and modify your resume accordingly.

      This effectively selects for candidates who are able to think like an idiot: a critical skill for dealing with customers and management after landing the job!

    2. Re:in summary... by forkazoo · · Score: 2

      I read this as "Do the work for HR/Recruiters, they're not intelligent enough to do it themselves".

      That's a bit unfair. There are occasional HR people who are quite intelligent. (They may be rare, but it's not an ansolute given that all HR are stupid.)

      But, even the intelligent ones aren't going to do a bunch of extra work for no reason. Yes, you should always try to make it as easy as possible to hire you. HR people may have to hire candidates for 20 wildly different specialties by Thursday. They may have to hire an accountant, a DBA, a sales person, and a nurse all at the same time. If an HR person had a deep interest or understanding about IT, they would probably just be an IT person instead of HR. Somebody hands them a big list of topic-specific jargon. They try to get some sense of what sort of person they need, but the distinctions between writing SQL, Java, and ASM are almost certainly going to be mostly lost on the HR person.

      Then, once the HR person gets some understanding of who they need to find, cheat sheet of keywords in hand, they get about 1500 resumes dumped on their desk. Half of them are from short order cooks who heard that "Computers" is a good business to get into. Half the remainder are from college grads and tech support weenies who have decided to fluff up their resume far beyond their abilities with huge, blatant lies. Then they still have a pile of things to sort through of people who probably could do the job. They may simply not have enough time to do more than give a cursory skimming of most of the resumes. So, if a resume has all the words they've been told to look for, it'll tend to get quickly to the top of the pile. If a resume has none of them, it'll tend to wind up at the bottom.

      In bad cases, that's because the HR drone can't line up "Oracle and MS SQL Server Admin" on a resume with "Database Manager" on a request. It seems dumb, but to a person not in the specific field, the jargon can seem very opaque. So, you have to try to make it as easy as possible for somebody to hire you. I almost always tweak my resume to only mention relevant experiences whenever I apply for a job I'm actually interested in. It means I have a better signal:noise ratio for that position, and I'm more likely to sounds like what they've been told to find. It's a little more work. But, boo hoo. They probably want somebody who thinks working hard to make other people's lives easier is a good thing.

    3. Re:in summary... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If hiring for all of these different departments is too difficult for HR, then perhaps HR should be gotten rid of and the managers of the departments can do the hiring. They would probably prefer to not have all of their good candidates weeded out in favor of the ones whose synonyms for industry experience happened to line up with HRs buzzword list.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:in summary... by JonJ · · Score: 1

      I was just imagining a non-tech person going "They want a fucking Oracle?!"

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
    5. Re:in summary... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If hiring for all of these different departments is too difficult for HR, then perhaps HR should be gotten rid of and the managers of the departments can do the hiring.

      I don't think you can ever have been involved with much hiring. There is a reason companies have HR departments: they don't want their highly paid managers to spend 90% of their time reading resumes instead of doing actual work.

      If you're so arrogant that you can't be bothered to tailor your resume for the job you're applying for, because you think your sheer genius should be enough to convince anyone, you don't deserve an interview, never mind a job.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:in summary... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can ever have been involved with much hiring. There is a reason companies have HR departments: they don't want their highly paid managers to spend 90% of their time reading resumes instead of doing actual work.
      Well, I don't exactly hire for a living, but as a technical manager myself, I have been involved in a fair amount of hiring. I don't know what "actual work" a company expects technical managers to do, but I would imagine chief among them would be managing their existing reports and interviewing potential new hires.
      If you're so arrogant that you can't be bothered to tailor your resume for the job you're applying for, because you think your sheer genius should be enough to convince anyone, you don't deserve an interview, never mind a job.
      People who obviously tailor their resume for the job automatically lose credit with me from the get-go. They are not telling me what they are good at, they are telling me what the job is asking for them to be good at, which I already know. Furthermore, they are wasting my time by pretending to be good at something they are not. They are also wasting their time because they only place they are going to get hired is one that doesn't see through their charade. I sure wouldn't want to work for a company that is dumb enough to fall for the ruse of a resume SEO.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:in summary... by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Well said... is not what we want to hear but the truth is we need to "align" our resumes for an easy match past HR

  27. My resume is my only marketing material by lgordon · · Score: 2

    As a software consultant and occasional contract employee, in all cases, the resume is what gets me hired, and the phone interview is just a safeguard to make sure I'm a real person. Often the interview turns into a technology bull session with the developers making sure that I have the correct industry understanding and not whether I have done the things I stated I could do. I clearly communicated that fact to them already. In my resume.

    1. Re:My resume is my only marketing material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been hired for the past 10 years sight unseen from companies on the east coast contracting me out to companies on the west coast. It feels a bit crazy to have never actually met your employers. (But unless they're paying for airfare, why would I?)

  28. See ya, Slashdot. by 1729 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We're getting this every day? And Dice is apparently deleting comments? Fuck that. Slashdot is done. Nice work, Dice.

    PS: I'm on my way over to delete my Dice profile too, since the company is clearly incompetent and unethical.

    1. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      I'll say it again here: let's go STREISAND on their asses.

    2. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by stafil · · Score: 1

      Just playing the Devil's advocate here.

      Why is everybody so upset with the Dice stories? Is it that hard to just ignore them the same way we ignore the rest of ads on the internet?

      After all it's not like it's difficult to distinguish them..

      Just a thought...

    3. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by wirelessduck · · Score: 2
      --
      "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." - Bernard Baruch
    4. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      I'm going to look into this, however, if Slashdot now deletes comments, I'm gone. No rhetorical about it

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    5. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by samzenpus · · Score: 5, Informative

      We didn't delete anyone's comments. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3455889&cid=42890287

    6. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by Maow · · Score: 1

      We're getting this every day? And Dice is apparently deleting comments? Fuck that. Slashdot is done. Nice work, Dice.

      PS: I'm on my way over to delete my Dice profile too, since the company is clearly incompetent and unethical.

      You mean this post: NO idea....?

    7. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Follow the link and you'll see the comment wasn't actually deleted.

    8. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by 1729 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm glad Dice isn't deleting comments. Still, with the unlabelled ads slipped in as editorial content, this site is done.

    9. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. This is the comment that was "deleted"

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3455889&cid=42879165

    10. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to know. Are you reading the comments on this page, and ones like it?

      (I'm not asking to be facetious, and I'm not expecting any sort of commitment, I'm just asking if people that make decisions in Dice read the sorts of comments on this page?)

    11. Re:See ya, Slashdot. by sapgau · · Score: 1

      I'm another clueless slashdoter in agreement with the parent post...

      *shrugs*

  29. Goodbye Dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have used Dice, both as a candidate and as a manager looking for candidates.

    Never again.

  30. She works for dice but uses LinkedIn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dice should fire her.

    1. Re:She works for dice but uses LinkedIn? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      That is where she got the Dice job... ;)

  31. Anyone else "trying" to quit? by ponds · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every time I read one of these, it confirms that there's no purpose in Slashdot anymore, but my muscle memory for the last ~12 years or so keeps navigating me to slashdot subconciously. Then when I figure out what I'm doing, I get all sad. Anyone else in this situation? This is not intended to be modded Funny :/

    1. Re:Anyone else "trying" to quit? by TheTerseOne · · Score: 1

      Yep. I open up my lunch and it just doesn't taste as good without a green and white screen in front of me. I want to quit. I can't. I've got nowhere else to go.....

      --
      "Newspapers: A tiny little part of the internet, printed out yesterday, and delivered to your house"
    2. Re:Anyone else "trying" to quit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I do and I don't even bother to sign in anymore hence the AC Post.

    3. Re:Anyone else "trying" to quit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      100% yes.

      I've been a regular reader since late 1998 or so, had 6 digit uid and then just got too busy to post for a few years during a business startup. Forgot my username AND password. Since then, about 2001, I've been a daily reader and post AC under "-s" or "-Si".

      I'm saddened a little more each day. Slashdot is a very special place as far as web forums go. I've seen many flamewars and hot gritz comments, but mostly a surprisingly amount of good info or insight on the topics at hand.

      I come for the comments. I can get rss feeds of shite stories anywhere,

      As the reader base slowly shifts from real uber geek to "emo geek (because it's chic)", it's turning into a plain old shit-hole web forum. So sad.

      Fuck you younger generation, only send us your true geeks and nerds.
      Fuck you astroturfers
      Fuck you slashvertisements
      Fuck you Dice holdings. don't taint the special thing that is here.

      -S

    4. Re:Anyone else "trying" to quit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Except I still have my 6-digit. :)

    5. Re:Anyone else "trying" to quit? by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      You just need to learn a new muscle memory. If you poke yourself in the eye every time you go back to slashdot, you'll eventually remember not to go there and you'll replace your old habit with the new eye-poking muscle memory . Habitual eye-poking also has the additional benefit of being less painful than reading Slashvertisements like this too!

    6. Re:Anyone else "trying" to quit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you, I still can't shake the conditioning to peruse /. each morning... tasting more and more like crap and less filling.

      I suspected things were going downhill when i stopped seeing posts from long-time users like docRuby.

      Sad that a 10-15 year relationship should crumble in a matter of months, but i see a fat lady stepping up to the mike.

  32. That article's title by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

    Sounds very much like "An accidental discovery has exposed a loophole in female psychology!" So fscking fishy...

    1. Re:That article's title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap! I just looked that up on Google. I stopped short of sending my email though.

  33. One piece of valuable advice by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    “Hiring managers have a big pile of résumés to review, and they are always looking for a reason to put you in the ‘no’ pile.”

    If you're going through the resume stage, the only goal is to get yourself into the "call" stack rather than the trash pile. When hundreds of resumes come in for a position, its far more important for HR to not let crap through then it is for them to try to find the perfect candidate - the reality is probably that there are several differently (but equally) qualified candidates for the position, and if any one of them is hired then HR and management have done their jobs.

    If one of those candidates makes it easy to validate and hire them, and one doesn't, then the first one gets the job.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  34. Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm done slashdot...it's been great lurking for all these years, but your time has passed.

  35. This "Dice" shit is easy to avoid... by shoes58 · · Score: 1

    Never open an article submitted by "Slashdot Staff". Problem solved! Now, die in a fire, Dice...

    1. Re:This "Dice" shit is easy to avoid... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's not going to be news for nerds until it's an article from Dice on Sphere.

  36. lax hiring standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My issue with finding employment mostly has to do with who I am competing with in my field. Computer science has become a field like doctors and lawyers where people get involved with it for the high salaries. People who are motivated by monetary gain for employment are more willing to make concessions just to have the job that pays $200,000.

    In order to get that salary they will embellish their work experience, their skills or whatever it takes to get that position. Once employed, they generally don't mind 'doing it all', resulting in one employee handling the network, databases and systems administration, for one salary. This is appealing to businesses, because it means they have to hire fewer people, but it leads to mediocrity.

    The crux of the problem seems to me to be that there are just too many unskilled people applying for skilled work. If 100 skilled employees apply to Google, there are probably 10,000 unskilled idiots sending in resumes, for the same position. The signal to noise ratio for HR and recruiting is ridiculous, and they have to resort to automating the filtering process down to some reasonable level. This means a LOT of good candidates get pushed into the trash. It's similar to the problem of spam; most people get lots of spam, occasionally an email gets mis-identified as spam, and you never see it.

    I don't know what it is like in other regions and other fields, but Silicon Valley's hiring practices need a serious overhaul. I've long thought that a 'guild' type system for technical employees would be useful, where there is a clear path from apprentice to master, and people's professional reputations are paid closer attention to. Industry accepted certifications could also help, but that doesn't prevent 'paper tigers.' Having a guild or even an agent, like talent in Hollywood, would help a skilled employee break out from the background noise that all the unskilled idiots are making.

    Finding work, networking with people and schmoozing requires social ability, and technical people are often not that social. Having an agent make connections for you, and get you in front of the right people would be incredibly beneficial, and smooth the hiring process for employers and candidates. That only works, however, if the people doing the networking are 'good' and they are representing their clients properly. Recruitment is a booming field full of talentless jerks that are only interested in making their commission and don't seem to care about their reputations.

    Sites like LinkedIn are handy for connecting people, but I don't know about everyone else, but none of the recruiters that contact me seem to read ANYTHING in my profile. They just blast out email to whoever has particular keywords in their profile, and hope to hear back from a small percentage of them. Sounds kind of like spam, no? There's no investment from the recruiter and they're more than likely working under quotas, where they need to contact/call at least 20 people a day, or some bullshit like that. The recruiter doesn't care if you get the job, because they'll get someone the job, and make their money, regardless of the candidate's talent.

    Job titles are also problematic. People don't understand what 'senior' means, especially in many small/new companies. Someone fresh out of college is NOT a Senior Linux Administrator, regardless of what theory you may know. Even after 5 years of solid work, I would disagree with someone being considered 'senior', but that isn't how job titles work here. There isn't some agreed upon or 'industry standard' for junior, mid-level, senior, etc.

    Then you have the creative 'impressive' job titles, like Server Operations Engineer (Linux Admin), Site Reliability Engineer (Linux Admin), etc. I realize there are different skills needed for various areas of a company, and it is tempting to distinguish employees by title, rather than skillset, but that's what departments are for. You have Linux Admins working in the Site Reliability Department, or whatever.

    1. Re:lax hiring standards by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      There isn't some agreed upon or 'industry standard' for junior, mid-level, senior, etc.
      Sure, there is. When you demand more income than HR's established range for mid-level, and threaten to quit, then they name you senior, and bump you up to the lowest pay in the senior rank. The upshot of this for HR, is that when you move from the highest paid mid-level to the lowest paid senior, the average pay of both ranges goes down, so they get to readjust both ranges to within one deviation of the new average and tada!, the ranges for both levels goes down.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:lax hiring standards by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Who on earth is making $200k in their jobs?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  37. Position re-opened for hire! by CaptainNerdCave · · Score: 2

    This is why we keep seeing positions that are re-listed. HR people can't or won't do their jobs, and they get crap. Recruiters do even worse by telling the applicants what to say on resumes and in interviews, and they bring in crap.

    1. Re:Position re-opened for hire! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who was unemployed, and went to the Job Centre to get assistance fnding work. Not only did they ignore what she said her skills were, they sent her for jobs which were totally outside her field of experience and for which she was utterly unqualified. She was instructed to apply for a job at a university which required a Masters degre in a Maths discipline. She has a BA in History.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  38. And so it has come to this by 6031769 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been fun, it really has. Over the years as a lurker, as AC and then eventually as a lowly 6-digiter I have seen tons of insight, reasoned debate and out-and-out flame wars. There's been +5 Funny and -1 Troll and everything in between. And despite all of the bitching, there really was quite a bit of news for nerds and stuff that mattered.

    Up until the last couple of months, when it all seems to have gone down the pan at warp factor nine. On this wonderful internet of ours things come and things go. Now is clearly the time for the venerable /. to go and I will help it on its way, albeit with a heavy heart.

    So long, slashdot!

    --
    Burns: We're building a casino!
    McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
  39. Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An applicant created a marketing brochure promoting herself as the best candidate and was hired.

    Reminded me of this.

  40. It needs more apprenticeships / tech schools not by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    It needs more apprenticeships / tech schools not just college.

    4 years pure college classroom is way to much for IT and has lot's of skill gaps. I say max 2-3 years classroom and more tech / trades schools with apprenticeships.

    College put out paper tigers at a much higher cost then certifications.

  41. University of Nix by VAXcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    This reminds me of an application bought here at MegaBigCompany years back that promised to automatically scan, sort, classify, grade and determine what resumes where good for what job openings. HR was thrilled at the work it would save. We lost a lot of faith in it when we noticed that it reported many of applicants whose resumes it had scanned had gone to the University of Nix....we wondered, did they all go to a strangely named college? Then it occurred to me that the app was parsing UNIX on the resumes of people looking for IT jobs, as the University of Nix....

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    1. Re:University of Nix by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 2

      I recall a story going round my employer in the early 90s that someone had turned up for an interview claiming all sorts of expertise and detailed knowledge of UN-Nine.

      The HR interviewer was clearly intending to hire - fortunately the technical interview came afterwards.

      It all sounded impressive until the penny dropped and it was clear they thought UNIX came after UNVIII

  42. Yvonnee Lee's resume is awful! by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 2

    Check her out on LinkedIn. Her resume is rambling, confused, filled with recommendations from junior-level staff, and uses a lot of buzz words without describing what she actually does. Plus, check out her picture. Who beat her with the ugly stick?

    1. Re:Yvonnee Lee's resume is awful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder just how many folks are looking at her personal info. Not a place I'd want to be with this crowd.

    2. Re:Yvonnee Lee's resume is awful! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Apparently, she is 3rd level to me on linkedin. I looked at her Endorsed skills. Only two of them are actually skills. The rest of them are social traits.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:Yvonnee Lee's resume is awful! by thePig · · Score: 2

      Personal attacks on anyone - especially on things people have no control of - is rather distasteful and takes focus away from the actual issue - slashvertisements.

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    4. Re:Yvonnee Lee's resume is awful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will reach the new public who will be told to call a toll-free number or to go to a bookstore and get the book.

      When they call into the 1-800 number, their name is taken and the names are then sent on to you.

    5. Re:Yvonnee Lee's resume is awful! by swillden · · Score: 1

      Apparently, she is 3rd level to me on linkedin. I looked at her Endorsed skills. Only two of them are actually skills. The rest of them are social traits.

      Me too, apparently. 3rd level to me, I mean. I love this bit from her experience descriptions (emphasis mine):

      Created an elearning and professional development website using HTML, CSS, WordPress, BuddyPress, and add-ons supporting social media, security, and social media.

      What attention to detail!

      Also, judging by the comments on this article, her community-building skills may need some work. Granted that what works with many communities is likely to be less effective on slashdot. The key to building rapport with anti-social nerds is to be one yourself.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Yvonnee Lee's resume is awful! by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1
      I think if someone posts an article critical of other people's resumes, their resume better be perfect. If their picture makes them look hideous, well, they did a bad job and shouldn't be giving advice to others. That plus the content being a jumble of buzzwords that makes it hard to figure out what she really does makes me think not only is their slashvertisements going on -- but the people writing them aren't even as competent as the average ./ reader to write and post them.

      I think it's fair game. If you post BS, you will be called on it. If you want to tell others how to make their resume look, yours better be perfect, not the kind that makes me click away from the page instantly. I've hired many over the years and I would never take a second look at Yvonne's resume, even if I had a position for a writer to make blog posts/etc on social media.

  43. Slashvertisement? by loufoque · · Score: 1

    I do not see any point to this article.
    Is that what they call a slashvertisement?

  44. F You Dice Holdings! by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    What, is Dice going to spam Slashdot every single day with Dice propaganda?

    I am really starting to hate the new Slashdot.

  45. In my case by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I must have the right terms in my resume. I'm getting emails, calls, etc. Of course I can tell they didn't READ my resume because I put catch terms in there that would clue them if they did.

    1. Re:In my case by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, they won't hire you anyway, unless your on an H1b. I have gotten literally not one job e-mail in the last 6 months that was not from an Indian firm trying to place H1bs.
      Amusing anecdote, back in 2000, I was looking for a job. My resume was out on Dice, and I had listed the following as an accomplishment "Designed and implemented Sybase Replication and incremental update scheme to reduce Datawarehouse nightly batch load time by 75%." Lo and behold, I found a job posting that had this exact wording in it, from some consulting company. So I applied for it, attaching the copy of my resume from which they had plagiarized my accomplishment. I didn't even get a callback.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  46. Enough already! by asackett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been a fun ride, slashdot, but slamming into the wall at the end ruined it for me. Dice Holdings, Inc. can apply big wet smoochies to that part of my anatomy that is reserved for evacuating the stuff that Dice does best.

    --

    Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

  47. Is this the 3rd, or 4th or 5th? by mutube · · Score: 1

    I've stuck dice.com in my hosts file to make sure I don't ever go there by accident.

    Not sure that was their intended effect.

  48. Meme alert. by mutube · · Score: 1

    Yvonne Lee, Community Manager at Dice.com writes,

    Your message here.

    1. Re:Meme alert. by mutube · · Score: 1

      Yvonne Lee, Community Manager at Dice.com writes,

      I went for a job interview as a blacksmith yesterday. He said, "Have you ever shoed a horse?"
      I said, "No, but I've told a donkey to fuck off."

    2. Re:Meme alert. by mutube · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yvonne Lee, Community Manager at Dice.com writes,

      I went for a job at NASA yesterday.
      Everything was going well until they asked me what my ambitions were.
      I replied, "The sky's the limit!" and they told me I wasn't suitable :/

  49. So don't fscking read the Dice articles then by morkk · · Score: 1

    Ignore everything posted by Yvonne - how hard is that? The "Slashdot Staff" will soon get the message when there are NO replies to their adverticles [sic].

    The fact is that all you posters WANT to be outraged. It's like a sexual thrill (at least that's what Andrew Denton said on the (Oz) ABC show "Shock Horror Aunty").

  50. "Slashdot Staff".... by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...has now been excluded on my options. Hopefully that should take care of all the Dice stories for me.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  51. So long, slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and thanks for all the fish!

  52. But... by Maudib · · Score: 1

    Why can't we have a nice discussion about this great premium content?

  53. YOU CAN DO BETTER THAN DICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simplyhired.com is a much better job board than dice. Craigslist is competitive with dice.

  54. Corporations's needs make me stupid. by SluttyButt · · Score: 1

    Need I elaborate?

  55. Unfortunately by Max_W · · Score: 1

    a resume has to impress an imbecile in an HR. Often a corrupted imbecile with a hidden agenda (allegedly) .

    That is why we have got a global economical crisis. HR is to be rethought and revamped from the ground up.

  56. In Soviet Russia... by Roachie · · Score: 1

    resume mistake hire you!!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  57. Think out of the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yvonne wrote down some good basic advice, but nearly all of us are already aware of what she had to say, now that we've collectively endured three economic turn downs in twelve years. Here's the real story:

    For the last twelve years, American high tech companies are outsourcing engineering jobs as fast as they can, without getting caught. They now employ more engineers and way more technical support people overseas than they employ here at home. The Feds have done nothing about it.

    Our former, present and future employers are now lobbying for a SIXFOLD INCREASE in H1-B visas. They are saying that there aren't enough engineers here to do the work they have. Well, I know of about 20,000 good, employable Engineers just in California, who would love to be working again. Thousands more have left the State because they couldn't afford to stay here anymore. Please write US Sens. Debbie Stabenow, Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer for details on their current immigration and H1-B proposals. I'd note the Republicans here, too; but they are too numerous to list.

    If you want a job; do three things: 1) look at starting your own business, and 2) raise public Hell with local politicians about the fact that you're still unemployed and they've done not a damned thing to help in four years; and 3) do what Yvonne says. Our resumes can always be improved a little.

  58. /. becoming a jobsite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, in the last week there's been at least two slashvertisements for jobs and now a resume training. This sucks.

    Even the ghost in the machine knows this sucks, my captcha just a moment ago was "ruined"

  59. categories by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Can we have a dice.com story category so that we can just ignore them all?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  60. slashdot as dice.com shill site? by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WWCTD

    What
    Would
    Commander
    Taco
    Do?

    Wonder how he feels about this. I mean, he got his pile of $$ and "is out" but still, I bet he cares.

    --
    -Styopa
  61. Stop stop stop by balbus000 · · Score: 1

    Stop stop stop stop stop stop stop stop stop.

    Please.

    Thank you.

  62. what an idiot by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Anyone read the accompanying article titled: "How Recruiters Read Resumes In 10 Seconds or Less?"
    Well, this definitely explains how completely unqualified, unfriendly, terrible workers that everyone in the office hates get hired in the first place. I always wondered that. If this jackass narrows it down to 3 people that he deems qualified from just "on paper" type stats, then they all turn out to be arrogant and unfriendly people that can't get along with others, he just failed but he's going to send one to the client anyway because they're "the most qualified" and "properly educated" IN THEORY. In practice, they're an asshole. But then the company gets all impressed by the perfect on-paper match and hires them anyway. Then all the coworkers get to suffer until that asshole gets fired.

    I'm the absolute best IT worker any company could ever ask for. I'm the head IT manager at my company at the age of 25. I know everything from graphics design to AV equipment to server maintenance to programming to web design to malware removal and security and have years of professional experience in each field...but I have 2 associates degrees. Oops, looks like that jackass threw my resume out. Oh well. Due to my age, I have the latest education in the most modern technologies and ways to operating and IT system. He didn't think of that though. He wants some 45 year old because 15 years of experience looks prettier on paper. I guess his client gets some less quality options because his preconceived notion of what a good employee looks like ruined it. But really, that's his job as a recruiter. He wants to trick the company into thinking that they should ignore the person and just hire the resume because it's God's gift to that position and matches it perfectly. This is why I quit my old tech contractor. I was the best programmer and they knew damn well that was true but they didn't think my 2-year degree would impress anyone. I even took their worldwide staff programming assessment and beat 81% of their programmers. But they're recruiters so they don't deal in reality, they deal in bullshit and lies to make a quick buck. People like that should be shot.

  63. Article is useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother clicking on the link. The twelve mistakes are things that you wouldn't ever do to begin with and the rest is similarly contentless.
    The rest of Dice isn't much better by the way, so you might want to avoid that site.