Slashdot Mirror


T-Mobile Ends Contracts and Subsidies

AlphaWolf_HK writes "In what I see as a refreshing change, T-Mobile, the fourth largest carrier in the U.S., has made sweeping changes to its service, ending both phone subsidies and service contracts. Its CEO said, 'Here's the deal: If we suck this month, go somewhere else. If we're good, stay with us.' As part of that change, the new base plan will include unlimited access, including voice, text, and data. Data will be restricted to edge speeds after 500MB with no overage costs, but can be upgraded to 2.5GB for $10, or unlimited for $20. Portable Wi-Fi hotspot usage is also unrestricted for no additional cost. In addition, LTE services just went live in eight markets. As is already standard practice with T-Mobile, you are free to bring your own device. To keep customers from having to front the full cost of the phone with unsubsidized plans, they'll let people pay off phones in installments. They're also getting the iPhone 5 next month for $650."

283 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A move in the right direction.

  2. 500GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's more then Comcast prefers I use.

    1. Re:500GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's more then Comcast prefers I use.

      500MB I believe...

  3. 500GB in the article summary is a typo by linuxguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is supposed to be 500MB. You don't usually "upgrade" from 500GB to 2.5GB of data for $10 a month.

    1. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah I'll take the blame for that gaffe, as I originally typed that. Though I wish the editor kept my comment about the Nexus 4 and how it can be hacked to work with t-mobiles LTE.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    2. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by syntap · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't usually "upgrade" from 500GB to 2.5GB of data for $10 a month.

      Verizon was much cooler, they chopped your unlimited data down to a 2GB cap for FREE when you "upgraded" your phone! T-Mobile sucks!

    3. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that info about the Nexus 4. I wish the ed. had kept it in, too.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2

      You keep jellybean 4.2.2 but downgrade the radio to a version that has lte.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    5. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      You and I, no, but I wouldn't be surprised if some telecom carriers actually tried to sell something like that as an "upgrade."

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    6. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Though I wish the editor kept my comment about the Nexus 4 and how it can be hacked to work with t-mobiles LTE.

      Given as the N4 runs beautifully with T-Mobile's HSPA+42, I'm not sure I see the point.

    7. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is also supposed to be EDGE, not edge. EDGE is an acronym for "Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution", not some arbitrary name.

    8. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Me neither because lte is a battery hog. But it is there if you feel like tinkering.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    9. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by darjen · · Score: 1

      I rarely use more than 2GB. Most of the time I need the internet I'm at home or work. If they are gonna raise prices, I would rather them do it on the heavier users.

    10. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      We're supposed to have all that super 3G stuff here in the UK but I've yet to see it.
      Although admittedly my N4, at 2Mbps up and down is at least twice as fast as my old HTC Desire.
      A friend with a 3G stick up in her loft gets 5Mbps down with regular 7Mbps 3G stick.

    11. Re:500GB in the article summary is a typo by TheRealDevTrash · · Score: 1

      Hacked? Don't you just buy a SIM for it and you're good to go?

      --
      I used to be /dev/trash but Slashdot no longer allows slashes for usernames.
  4. They get it by SgtKeeling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds like T-Mobile is going to be offering reasonable, attractive cell phone plans. Wow. I'm genuinely surprised that such a large carrier is moving in this direction. Good on them.

    1. Re:They get it by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like a company that is going to pick up a lot of customers very quickly.
      Up here in Vancouver Canada there are really only two carriers. Rogers/Fido or Bell/Telus. Wind is here also, but they seem like they are flailing.
      Maybe there will be something useable by October when my contract with Bell ends.
      Useable = Unlimited TXT, a whack of data, call display, and maybe 200 minutes a month. For less than $90 a month.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:They get it by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

      If only their coverage wasn't easily the worst of the big 4 a move to T-Mo would be easy. If you live in the city then this is a great plan and you should take it. If you ever intend to leave the city then it's not so great. I had T-Mo for years before I finally had to give up and switch to Verizon, because the coverage was a constant problem for me.

      Bonus though: at least when I had it T-Mo worked in the city while AT&T (my wife's provider) was crapping themselves due to excessive volume. I could call and even get data through when her phone was reduced to a glorified iPod Touch due to total and complete network overload.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:They get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I doubt it will be quick. Many are still locked into contracts with the others. To get out would cost a bit of cash so they cant be expected to jump on day one ( like your self ).

      Another problem is coverage area, around here, they have the least coverage.

    4. Re:They get it by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bell and Telus aren't the same. Telus is what used to be Alberta Government Telephones and BC Tel. The former was privatized in 1991 and merged with the latter in 1998. It's an excellent example of why privatizing crowns is a bad idea.

      Bell's other brand is Virgin and Telus has the brand Koodoo.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:They get it by danbob999 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bell and Telus share spectrum/towers for their HSPA network however. And often their plans are the same. They have some sort of unholy alliance where the customer is loosing. Of course they wouldn't be allowed to merge so it's as far as they can go.

    6. Re:They get it by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Worries me that they don't have their old Monthly 4G plans listed... I hopped on one of those, giving up the unlimited minutes for a great deal more data and a $30/mo total cell phone bill. Unlimited talk time? Who talks to each other these days anyway!?

      --
      +1 Disagree
    7. Re:They get it by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. I not-so-fondly recall having to exit my apartment out the back door whenever a call came in (assuming it came in at all), since I couldn't get reliable reception in front of or inside the apartment. And that came after the apartment where I didn't get reception at all and would only find out I had received calls whenever I exited my apartment and had a flood of voicemails suddenly arrive. I dealt with that for three years in the end, and it was a miserable experience the entire time. Strange as it is for me to say it, switching to AT&T was a massive upgrade, and if the experiences I hear recounted to me by others in town who are still with T-Mobile are any indication, AT&T continues to be the better choice for anyone who is actually interested in making calls with their phone.

      And yet, despite that, I'd switch back to T-Mobile in a heartbeat if I thought their coverage had improved, just because I'm so fed up with the usurious pricing schemes that the majority of carriers are engaging in. Even though I have no plans to switch at this time, I laud their decision to make this change to their pricing. If they can extend their coverage or force their competitors to adopt similar plans, I'll be a very happy guy, one way or the other.

    8. Re:They get it by mike449 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The price is still fairly steep. $50/month for unlimited talk + 500MB of data.
      Data only is $20 for 500MB, $30 for 2GB, and it quickly goes up.
      The fact that these plans are reasonable and attractive tells a lot about the "competition" landscape in the US.

    9. Re:They get it by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      Koodo. They are a brand of telus so they use the telus antennas at the tops of the telus-owned towers (almost all the towers in BC), so they have great coverage. $45 gets you 200 min (unlimited incoming), 500MB, unlimited text. $60 gets you unlimited/unlimited/unlimited. No long-distance charges if both ends of the call are in Canada.

        Also the people at their mall kiosks don't look at you like you're crazy if you ask for just a sim card. I have a Nexus 4 which serves me well on their $30 plan but I almost always have a data overage and end up paying $40... which is still less than the $45 plan... Now that there is a really good phone available unlocked I would not touch a locked phone on a multiyear contract with a 10 foot pole.

    10. Re:They get it by eudaemon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or if they just gave away local cell extenders for free instead of wanting to charge for them. I'd stick it in my attic just so my neighbors could benefit as well. But not if I have to pay to fix T-Mobile's coverage.

    11. Re:They get it by dave562 · · Score: 2

      Did you ever contact them about the call problems? Most carriers take those dead zone reports seriously. It usually takes them 3-6 months to actually get field engineering around to resolving it though.

      I have only reported dead zones to Verizon, so YMMV.

    12. Re:They get it by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sounds like a company that is going to pick up a lot of customers very quickly.

      Not so sure... Imagine if Telus followed a similar pattern -

      Customer: How much for a 32 gig iPhone?
      Telus: $800
      Customer: EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS??!! It's only $150 at Rogers!
      Telus: Yes, but that price is subsidized.
      Customer: What does "subsidized" mean?
      Telus: Sigh.
      Customer: Bye, I'm heading to Rogers.

    13. Re:They get it by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      Also, I usually find dealing with Telus about anything to be an absolute nightmare but koodo's customer service seems to be pretty decent... but then again I have only ever delt with them for registration changes - most of the changes you'd want to do to your account can be done online with minimal frustration.

    14. Re:They get it by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I don't recall having reported any of them, no, and that is a good suggestion. Nonetheless, it's a bit disappointing that they're still having these issues five and six years later in my town.

    15. Re:They get it by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      $650 for a phone

      [rolls on floor laughing]

      There really is a sucker born every minute.

    16. Re:They get it by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I'm with Rogers now, but I'm unlocking my phone and going with Fido at the end of the month. The plans at Fido and Koodo have suddenly changed, and Virgin Canada seems to be matching them. $50/month gets you effectively unlimited everything, with 1GB of data. $10/GB overage. When I discussed my imminent departure with the people at Rogers, they tried to make me comparable offers, but most of them seemed surprised those new plans existed.

      Oh, and no contracts if you have your own unlocked phone, but it doesn't seem to reduce the cost. If you go with a 2 year contract, you can cancel any time (here in Quebec) and just pay out the rest of the phone subsidy. There's also a $50 cancellation fee. So it's slowly getting better here.

    17. Re:They get it by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Informative

      Customer: How much for a 32 gig iPhone?
      Telus: $800
      Customer: EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS??!! It's only $150 at Rogers!
      Telus: Yes, but that price is subsidized.
      Customer: What does "subsidized" mean?

      Although, with the new T-Mobile pricing, you pay a down payment upfront (which may be zero, depending on the phone), then monthly payment on the phone - listed separately. If you want to cancel service, you just have to pay off the phone. The difference is that people can directly see what they're paying for.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    18. Re:They get it by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      That is cheap. AT&T wants $200 for a 16GB iPhone5. And, if AT&T's monthly costs come to ~$100-150, I'd hate to see Rogers' monthly bill to compensate for the customer's perceived cost differential.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    19. Re:They get it by isopropanol · · Score: 3, Informative

      All of the carriers share the towers, but the tower owner (usually Telus) gets the top spot. Bell usually bids highest and gets the second spot, Rogers next and Mobilicity and Wind are usually lowest. Mobilicity and wind also have microcells in some dense areas in Vancouver too which is why they have better coverage in places like Metrotown but sketchy coverage away from dense areas.

      Last time I checked, Telus, Bell, and Rogers had nearly identical plans and you had to go to the rebrands (Fido, Koodo, Virgin) or small carriers (Mobilicity, Wind) to get any differentiation, Sadly Mobilicity and Wind have roaming-only coverage on Vancouver Island, so they are ruled out in my case.

      Also of interest in some cities in the province.... If you are a shaw internet customer you can connect your phone to the "Shaw Open" wifi access points and once you register the device (you need your shaw email address and password), it will be remembered so you can save on your data plan and get wireless-n speed. You can register up to 5 devices per account. I have "AutoSync" on my phone which toggles my sync when connecting and disconnecting wifi so emails come in pretty steadily as I drive past the access points.

    20. Re:They get it by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Down here in the states, at least in Kansas, Sprint. $80USD gets you unlimited texting, unlimited data, and 700 min/month, with unlimited calling nights, weekends, and to any cell phone on any American carrier.

      Beats the hell out of Verizon, anyway.

      --
      Sent from my CR-48
    21. Re:They get it by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sit down, because this is going to really blow your mind. I paid about 40 times that for a used car.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    22. Re:They get it by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Then buy a phone without a contract somewhere else & bring it to them. They don't care.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    23. Re:They get it by rueger · · Score: 1

      Will the new T-Mobile plans include the great Canadian rip-off where Voicemail is an $8-10 a MONTH extra on top of your $50 a month cel plan?

    24. Re:They get it by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      Just like Koodo, which is a rebrand/subsidiary of Telus.

    25. Re:They get it by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      Koodo has $60 unlimited and a 10% discount for sim-only, but only for "new customers" so when we got our Nexus 4's, my wife got the discount but I did not (even though my micro-sim was new).

    26. Re:They get it by Phrogman · · Score: 3, Informative

      The cellphone companies rely on their customers being stupid enough to opt for a subsidized phone though, and so far most people are more than happy to be stupid enough to do so. That way we can pay far more in the end for the same phone than we would if we bought it up front.
      I sincerely hope we get a reasonable company up here in Canada but until then we are stuck with the established oligarchy and their ridiculous/criminal pricing schemes.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    27. Re:They get it by todrules · · Score: 1

      If you're main problem is just inside, you can switch to Wifi, including Wifi calling. You'd have great coverage at home (assuming here that you have a wireless router and broadband connection).

    28. Re:They get it by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Ah ha hahahahaha. Snort. Giggle. Wheeze. Gasp.

      AT&T couldn't care less. Their crappy coverage in my town has reached the TV and newspaper on several occasions. The biggest response has been "but we put in a tower three years ago". In the past, if you complained they would knock out part of your bill, not any more. They have even quit allowing people to leave their contracts early because of poor coverage.

      But thanks for the giggle.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    29. Re:They get it by MessageApprovalMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Substitute "mobile computer that can make phone calls" for "phone" and your perspective may shift.

      Our mobile devices are more powerful than our desktops of 10 years ago, and the trend will only continue. Eventually we won't need separate "computers" or "game consoles" at all. Most point-and-shoot cameras, MP3 players, and PDAs have already been subsumed by "phones." What you get for your $650 is nothing short of incredible - even if it's more expensive than competing devices.

      --
      I'm Message Approval Man, and I approve this message.
    30. Re:They get it by starless · · Score: 1

      Many phones can work with T-mobile's service over wifi. For me that's at least as good as having a local cell extender.

      http://t-mobile-coverage.t-mobile.com/4g-wireless-broadband-service

      However, it appears the iPhone may not be able to use this initially.

      http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/26/t-mobile-iphone-no-wifi-calling-feature-enabled/

    31. Re:They get it by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      And their price drops if they don't upgrade

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    32. Re:They get it by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 2

      In the US there is no advantage in opting for an unsubsidized phone. The monthly cost is the same if the phone is subsidized or unsubsidized. I keep my phones for a very long time and T-Mobile has just become the only major carrier that competes for my use model.

    33. Re:They get it by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Worth noting, tmo will take and receive mms, sms, and calls via WiFi if you're at a hot spot. Saves a bundle when traveling out of the country.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    34. Re:They get it by dalias · · Score: 1

      I love how the iPhone is EXACTLY THE SAME THING as a $200 iPod Touch, except with a GSM/3G transceiver thrown in, and yet costs $450 more...

    35. Re:They get it by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Unless you use lots of data. Ting is utterly non-viable for anybody whose monthly data usage has to be measured in 'gigabytes'. Anything beyond ~250-500mb or so, and Ting will get *really* expensive. Ting is *not* for people who treat Youtube like a free on-demand music streaming service in their car ;-)

    36. Re:They get it by Nexus7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, T-Mobile's plans (well, at least the one I have) come with free and lousy voicemail. Ever want to hear that waiting voicemail early in the morning because it could be from work? Well, how's about you go through 29 of your saved voicemail that must be re-saved or will be deleted before you can hear the new voicemail? Hows about you can't go to their site and download the ones you want to save?

      Oh, you want to do that! OK, well, that will be premium voicemail. But yeah, the cheap-and-it-shows version is free.

    37. Re:They get it by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. I think that I have you beat. I paid nearly twice what you paid for a used car for a used car...

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    38. Re:They get it by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Blast you! You didn't tell me to sit down first!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    39. Re:They get it by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Thank walmart for this. Their phone plans are currently killing the market with little to no advertising. The big problem they, and now T-mobile will have is their phones will look really expensive at first. But thanks to Android I think we'll be seeing some much more reasonably priced smartphones in the near future. There's no reason we can't have a decent sub $40 phone with no contract that can do everything 90% of the market needs. In 10years I think people will laugh at you if you pull out a $600 phone.

    40. Re:They get it by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Virtually all of T-Mobile's Android phones can route their calls over Wi-fi. It's not wonderful, and it's not the full UMA thing (which treats the Internet as just another tower - complete with handoff, which T-Mobile hasn't implemented in their Android app alas) but it does help significantly with the coverage issue.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    41. Re:They get it by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

      They look similar, but the iPod Touch is 20% thinner, 20% lighter, still has the old A5 chip running perhaps 40% slower, has only half the RAM, lacks GPS, has a smaller battery, and it has a crappier camera.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re:They get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a 3 year contract with Rogers...

    43. Re:They get it by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      if you bought a smartphone with any carrier in the USA, you paid at least that much, since the "subsidy" is rolled into your rate plan, which with other carriers doesn't decrease in cost after you pay off the phone. who is the real sucker now?

    44. Re:They get it by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      The issue with T Mo is the coverage area.

      My prepay plan for 60$/mo nets me:

      2.5gb monthly at LTE.
      Unlimited talk
      Unlimited text

      In addition to Tmo's normal perks:

      Wifi calling for areas not covered
      Wifi hotspot and tethering at no added cost
      Bring your own device friendly

      T Mo has offered these packages for quite awhile now, (well over a year and a half!) But the main squeeze in the stores and on the billboards was the familiar subsidized phone plan model used by the other 3 cartels.

      My only suggestion is to make sure that T Mo has good coverage in your area first. Here's how: either get a friend on T Mo to test cell service at your house with his phone, or buy a rinkydink cheapo disposable tmo prepaid brick for 20$ and test yourself. I never trust coverage maps, because they lie. Only a real empirical test is appropriate when you are looking to plunk down 700$ for a smartphone. (As a plus, the sim from the rinkydink phone can go into your smexy smartphone, and when you set up the service, they can reprogram it for you.)

      As for the AC spouting about blasting through 500mb in 16 seconds, that's not really true unless you are running torrents or something.

    45. Re:They get it by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Or you can bring your own to the party, like a shiny Nexus 4 that you bought for $300 straight up.

    46. Re:They get it by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Mobilicity. Between them and Wind, they're scaring the shit out of the Rogers/Telus/Bell triopoly. I've been with Fido for ages because I used to have the old pre-Rogers acquisition City Fido grandfathered in on my account. When I went to renew in December they finally had something better for less money. I'm paying $60 a month now and have basically unlimited Canada-wide use of my phone, except for data, which is a 2 GB cap. I can literally walk from one end of the country to the other, talking 24/7 as I go and it costs me just that one flat rate. No roaming, no long distance charges. Something like that from one of the Big Boys was unthinkable 2 years ago, but when they're competing with metro-area plans from Wind and Mobilicity that are all you can eat for $25, they gotta do something.

    47. Re:They get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Check out Google voice. Blows away all carrier provided voicemail.

    48. Re:They get it by minkie · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Ting is great for people like me who don't watch video on their phone. I do email and maps/gps/traffic. I save a ton of money over my old AT&T plan where I never came close to using up my minutes or data quota but had to pay for it anyway.

    49. Re:They get it by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Their visual voicemail has been available since forever for free... Or maybe it was just included in my plan. But who the hell uses that anyways? I just use GVoice for my voicemails. Sends email links to where I can listen to them directly.

    50. Re:They get it by dalias · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Still, I'm sure 90% of the folks who want iPhones would be happy to have the equivalent of an iPod Touch with a $15 GSM module added into it for $215...

    51. Re:They get it by jandrese · · Score: 1

      While that's theoretically true, my experience is that most AT&T towers just tell T-Mo users to call 911 or go away. I had many many times where the AT&T logo showed up on my phone with even the EDGE or GPRS logos and attempting to make a call or load a page or even send an SMS just ended with my phone spinning for awhile and getting nowhere.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    52. Re:They get it by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      True, yet for some reason I continue to hear bad things from the friends I have who still use T-Mobile in town.

      At the time I was last with them (mid-2000s), the only "AT&T" in mobile phones in the U.S. was AT&T Wireless, which later got bought out by Cingular to become what is now AT&T Mobility or just AT&T. AT&T Wireless, if you don't recall, was struggling quite a bit back in the mid twenty-naughts (hence why it was swallowed by Cingular), and wasn't exactly known for having great coverage. That said, Cingular also had a roaming agreement with T-Mobile at the time that I was using them. So, long story short, I should have had decent coverage back then, if not from T-Mobile, then from Cingular or AT&T Wireless, but I don't recall ever seeing roaming kick in while I was in town (I do recall it kicking in when driving out of town), despite the problems I was having on a regular basis.

      I'll be honest: I don't have an answer for why my experience sucked, and you're absolutely correct in saying that the roaming agreements should have handled it. All I know is that, for me, they didn't, and that from what I have heard they continue to come up short in my region. I really do wish that wasn't the case, but it is.

    53. Re:They get it by gstrickler · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or, you could go with Virgin Mobile, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprint in the USA, and get the same features on the same Sprint network for less. Of course, you have to pay more up front for the phone, but if you're going to keep a phone for more than about 2 yrs, it's cheaper in the long run.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    54. Re:They get it by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like you just have a really shitty phone... I've had visual voicemail (which is a 0.00 line item on my bill) for about two years with T-Mobile. Yes, what I had *before* the VVM was complete crap, and a phone update was required to use VVM... but it works fine now! It's getting about time for me to upgrade, too.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    55. Re:They get it by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      They actually still do, those plans just aren't marketed hard anymore. See the last two plans listed on this page, specifically the one on the left: http://prepaid-phones.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans

      Yeah, I don't know why they aren't marketing plans those better; to most people I think they're much better options. I'm sure there are people who still need unlimited minutes, but personally I almost never use even the 300 minutes that it would take to make that plan have the same cost as the baseline new plan ($30/mo w/ 100min + 200 addl. min/mo at $0.10/min = $50/mo for 300mi/mo) and I definitely use a hell of a lot more data than that (it helps that I'm on an effectively unlimited plan, but even counting tethering I almost never break 2GB; I'm currently at around 1GB).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    56. Re:They get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just switch voicemail to Google Voice. It is free, you get a visual interface on Android or on the Web, and it also transcribes messages for you.

    57. Re:They get it by WGFCrafty · · Score: 2

      Google voice is free and provides speech-to-text. They'll even text it to you.

    58. Re:They get it by sdoca · · Score: 2

      This. Telus and Bell have an agreement to share their infrastructure to save on costs. It's not that Bell has a receiver/trasmitter on Telus towers below Telus', they USE Telus' in the west and vice versa in the east. "Bellus" is a common nickname for a reason...

    59. Re:They get it by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I suppose it depends on where you live. I had the opposite experience with AT&T in downtown LA. Granted we were a business customer with over 50 cellphone lines. But when we were getting 2 bars in the office, I called them up and they had us up to full strengthen in a couple of months.

      I had the same thing happen with Verizon in Long Beach, CA when they first rolled out 4G. Their network was a mess. It would not hold a 4G signal and the phone would constantly bounce between 3G and 4G. I called in three problem areas around the neighborhood and they fixed all of them.

      It all comes down to how you deal with them. Usually playing a bit dumb and saying something like, "I am getting terrible service here, but my friends who have (insert other carrier here) get great service. What can you guys do about it? I really do not want to have to go through the headache of changing plans, but a $200 disconnect fee is a small price to pay for being with a carrier that can give me good service."

    60. Re:They get it by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily... Where i live in Victoria, BC, in my basement suite i can just barely get a connection with my Rogers supplier, but when friends on Bell visit, they have no bars. (Yes, i'm centrally located IN the city, in Fairfield.) This would be evidence that they aren't sharing at least some towers...

    61. Re:They get it by mrvan · · Score: 1

      I'm in Israel for a temporary gig, and I was surprised at the mobile plans.

      For 100NIS (around 25$/month) I get unlimited calls within Israel *and* to all US phones and EU landlines, 2GM internet (speed capped) and unlimited text on a monthly subscription. Good stuff :-). Apparently they finally got decent competition in the last couple years, and it has certainly done them good...

    62. Re:They get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't post again about Visual Voicemail, but what no one else has mentioned is that you can use it even if you are on a PAYG plan. There is really no excuse for actually calling your voicemail any more. And why are you saving 29 voicemails anyway? That has never been efficient.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:They get it by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when the parent companies failed attempt to sell the company gives them a big pile of cash and a lot of spectrum. They start doing all the stuff they wanted to do but were never quite big enough to pull it off, so they can refocus on turning the redheaded step child (tmo usa) into a real contender.

    64. Re:They get it by crypticedge · · Score: 2

      They do explain the subsidies and the payoff really well in store (My phone broke monday, had to get a replacement)

      Some phones have that $150 cost up front, then a set month to month fee that will be line itemed on your bill, others have no up front cost and just a month to month fee on the bill.

      This is an incredibly good thing. After the terms of the phone payoff are complete, you own the phone, and you get a lower monthly bill, my bill dropped $30 swapping to this setup from their old, and I went from 5 GB/mo data to unlimited while keeping unlimited everything else.

    65. Re:They get it by L1mewater · · Score: 2

      I had T-Mobile for about seven years, up until a year ago. My default, free, "lousy" voicemail always played new messages before saved messages.

    66. Re:They get it by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I got my Galaxy S2 on 2 year contract, I worked out how much it would cost to buy the phone as cheaply as possible from somewhere outright, then pay for two years of service, or just go on a contract that included the phone for two years. The total cost was less to get the phone on contract.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    67. Re:They get it by darjen · · Score: 1

      Why not buy it used? I usually get the itch to upgrade when prices start to drop around or below $300. Then sell my older phone. Recently I just found someone to trade my galaxy nexus + $75 for an almost new galaxy s3. So now I have a more recent phone without being stuck on a new contract.

    68. Re:They get it by Petaris · · Score: 1

      I was just going to post this same thing. I replaced my Verizon voice mail with it and have been very happy. On top of that you get visual voice mail! :)

      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    69. Re:They get it by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 1

      Usually I bounce people over to StraightTalk (Tracfone/Walmart), because they can bounce off just about any network if you've got a phone keyed for that network.

      --
      Sent from my CR-48
    70. Re:They get it by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 1

      Well, Sprint does make an effort in advertising to say that it's truly unlimited. They do require you to pay extra for tethering.

      --
      Sent from my CR-48
    71. Re:They get it by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile's wifi calling only works with specific T-Mobile branded phones. Additionally, if your cell phone depends on your internet connection, how are you going to call the cable company to get them to fix your net connection?

    72. Re:They get it by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Uhm...I've had visual voicemail...since 2008...for free...including the ability to save voicemails to audio files on my SD card...on a phone running Windows Mobile 6.1. Their candybar phones don't have this functionality obviously, but every Android and Windows Mobile phone they've sold since the Touch Pro2 has been capable of visual voicemail, and as long as you have a data plan, they don't charge you extra for it.

    73. Re:They get it by netsentry · · Score: 1

      Well, Sprint does make an effort in advertising to say that it's truly unlimited. They do require you to pay extra for tethering.

      But Sprint's service is only unlimited in that there is no data shutoff. They do throttle speeds when certain bandwidth thresholds are met. They're even doing it now on the "entry service" they bought -- Boost Mobile http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprints-boost-mobile-start-smartphone-throttling-january/2012-12-19

    74. Re:They get it by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I saw that a bit later on. Still not sure how to get to those links from the main page... ? Anyhow, it's a damn near perfect plan for me. Makes me curious how many minutes most people use per month.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    75. Re:They get it by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Bell and Telus aren't the same. Telus is what used to be Alberta Government Telephones and BC Tel. The former was privatized in 1991 and merged with the latter in 1998. It's an excellent example of why privatizing crowns is a bad idea.

      Bell's other brand is Virgin and Telus has the brand Koodoo.

      ===
      You forgot Rogers and Chat-R

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    76. Re:They get it by compro01 · · Score: 1

      He'd already mentioned Rogers and Fido, which was the correct connection.

      I'd never heard of Chatr before your post, probably because that brand isn't used in my province.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    77. Re:They get it by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      And you can actually make and receive calls, and surf low bandwidth sites at a crawl in at least 60 percent of the areas you are in.

      Just switched from sprint to ATT yesterday. Who gives a shit about unlimited data when it's so slow you could max it out for a week and not hit 1gb. I have to get customer calls, one missed call could mean losing a lot more than the measly 30 bucks more a month between our two phones.

    78. Re:They get it by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      Yea, but for some reason google eats my calls sometimes completely and they go to VM. I'd like to at least have a chance to answer the call reliably. I use GV for my business main number, and my cell phone number direct is seperate. I'll be sitting at my computer and the browser will start ringing, but it won't go through to the cell phone. Sometimes it goes right to GV voicemail without ringing the browser or the phone.

    79. Re:They get it by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      Why? Nobody laughs when someone pulls out a 1500 dollar macbook, when the 300 dollar acer will do everything that the macbook will do that 95 percent of the population would need.

      Just picked up a note 2, and I'm pleased as punch with it. Sure it's ridiculously expensive, but so was my gaming pc, and I enjoy that too.

      I also drive a beat up 10 year old vehicle that's been paid off for 8 years. I don't enjoy vehicles, it doesn't mean I laugh at people for driving nice ones.

    80. Re:They get it by bl · · Score: 1

      The difference HERE is the monthly savings. If you compare T-Mobile with AT&T for monthly services, you save about $60 at the high end (AT&T's high end plan). So even with $20 monthly installments, you save $40 a month. The 32GB phone is $749USD, so after 18 months, the phone is paid off and you save $60 a month for the last 6 months of the 2 years that would have been a contract with AT&T. By my math, that saves $1,080 over the 2 years.

    81. Re:They get it by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a company that is going to pick up a lot of customers very quickly.

      By quickly, do you mean as soon as people's old 2 year contracts expire?

    82. Re:They get it by JLennox · · Score: 2

      The cell companies aren't discounting hardware because they love you.

      They're over charging non contract people because they want you on that contract. There are no new cell phone customers. A market where people can move freely from carrier to carrier at a whim is one where they lose.

    83. Re:They get it by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile has already been offering similar plans for a while to prepaid customers - there it was 2GB of data for an extra $10 or 5GB for $20. The change is that they are now moving their postpaid business model to the no-subsidy model.

  5. awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The best plans, the best prices, the best phones, and the hottest spokesgirl.

    1. Re:awesome! by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      You are a FOOOL.. ok yea she's hot, but I have always loved zeta.

  6. Question! by Jarmihi · · Score: 1

    Upgrade from 500 GB to 2.5 GB? Is that supposed to be "by 2.5 GB?"

    --
    ~Jarmihi
    1. Re:Question! by Jarmihi · · Score: 1

      Never mind...someone posted first before I refreshed the screen.

      --
      ~Jarmihi
  7. and there was much rejoicing by tatman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can only hope the big 2 will follow along.

    --
    I've always said English was my second language. Had Romeo and Juliet been written in C, I might have understood it.
    1. Re:and there was much rejoicing by oGMo · · Score: 1

      Sadly while T-Mobile has always had really good pricing in relation to AT&T and Verizon, they've always had really crappy coverage (though their service in covered areas always seemed decent). If you are someone who spends most of your time in a 4G-covered area, great. Otherwise, it's pretty much Verizon or bust (AT&T being pretty much the worst of both). Somehow T-Mobile always seems to get the best devices, though. I guess that and pricing set them apart.

      If they can get their coverage up to rival Verizon, though, we can expect real competition... or increased prices.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    2. Re:and there was much rejoicing by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile's plans are great, but they have two major (and related) deficiencies.

      1) Their primary 3G band is 1700 MHz. Only a small number of devices support this. Their secondary band is 1900 MHz - There are devices out there that don't support this either. They have zero service in UMTS850, while AT&T has pretty solid service there. (I have a Euro LTE Xperia Z unit - it has UMTS850 support but no 1900, and it gets solid coverage where I live.)
      2) Their coverage is, in general, crap. Back in 2008-2009, it was so bad that you could not make a call of any form within 20 miles of where I lived, but AT&T had solid 3G service. If you put a T-Mobile SIM into an unlocked phone, the AT&T towers would blacklist the IMEI for 15-20 minutes, even if you turned the phone off and put an AT&T SIM back in.

      I'm on AT&T now, but if Straight Talk sorts out their contract negotiations with AT&T, I'll switch to one of their BYOD SIM-only plans. (ST is an MVNO that resells both T-Mo and AT&T service. However right now they're only reselling T-Mo SIMs.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:and there was much rejoicing by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2

      I had similar reservations about t-mobile when I switched to them from Sprint last month, namely due to my dad having the same issues. However I have other relatives who are with them who told me that it's pretty good service now. So I switched, and it works pretty damn good.

      Also, I haven't done my research on their 3G bands, but I do know that on XDA they recently talked about how they've activated the more standardized bands in most markets. It seems to hold true, because I can get full 3G speeds on my ipad 2 when I put my t-mobile sim in it, whereas supposedly this wasn't possible a few months ago.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    4. Re:and there was much rejoicing by Orphis · · Score: 2

      When I was traveling to the USA with my European phone (iPhone 4S with 3G) last year, I took a prepaid card at T-Mobile and it worked fine for me. The vendor told me the 3G *could* work but since they were deploying the network (at the same time they deploy LTE), I shouldn't count on it (I was in SF then).
      3G worked when I exited the shop and put the new SIM card for about 20 minutes, then it fell back to Edge for 99% of my 6 weeks trip.

      I traveled on the east and west coast and only had 3G another time, at the top of my hotel in Manhattan at night, just after Sandy. Since most of the towers were down (because of the hurricane) that was a quite good surprise and I could Skype my family to tell them I was OK.
      Then, when I left, my iPhone told me I was connected to AT&T 5G. Never understood why, but it was fun to see (should have taken a screenshot!).

      For a 50$ plan with unlimited voice, text and data (of which 500MB of data high speed then low speeds) that was quite nice. Should they get a better high speed coverage, it would be definitely the best you can get when traveling in the USA.

    5. Re:and there was much rejoicing by yurtinus · · Score: 2

      Looks like they've been steadily expanding their 3G service (HSPA+ I think) into the 1900MHz band, likely driven by users bringing iPhones over. When I first got my phone (an Xperia Sola with no 1700MHz radio), I was always on EDGE for data. Starting perhaps in November, I was seeing 3g pop up in one spot around town. Now it looks like about 80% of my town is covered. Hopefully someday soon the 1900MHz band at my house will be upgraded...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    6. Re:and there was much rejoicing by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Visit the Florida Everglades, the AT&T-Verizon roles are swapped. AT&T has LTE in places where Verizon is limping on EVDO, 1-6mbps UMTS in places where Verizon can barely use 1xRTT, and you can force GPRS and nurse Google Maps into working on some godforsaken mangrove island somewhere in southeast Collier County, 15 miles south of the point where your friends with Verizon had their obligatory panic attack upon losing all service. It's all the lingering legacy of BellSouth Mobility's former "make it work everywhere" mission, and AT&T's new management will probably let those towers stay dark & rust away after the next major hurricane takes them down, but for now... it's kind of nice ;-)

    7. Re:and there was much rejoicing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm a T-Mo customer and I have watched my Xperia Play roam onto AT&T.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. T-Mobile is to be commended for this by linuxguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a bold step for T-Mobile and I hope that they succeed. However I am somewhat concerned as I have already seen too many people complain that they'd have to foot the bill for the full cost of the phone. The math would may prove to be difficult for people who are not good at it.

    1. Re:T-Mobile is to be commended for this by jazman_777 · · Score: 2

      They're counting on the intelligence of the American people. Whoops! As Mencken quipped, no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people. So T-Mobile is paddling upstream, spitting into the wind, and kicking against the goads.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:T-Mobile is to be commended for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They still offer a payment plan for phones similar to current carrier subsidies. You make a down payment then give them $20 per month for 2 years or whenever you pay off the phone. The advantage of TMobile's plan is once you pay off the phone your plan goes down $20 per month.

    3. Re:T-Mobile is to be commended for this by godrik · · Score: 1

      I am going with t-mobile right now, and I am obviously not going to change to something else. Go t-mobile!! Currently my phone has been "paid off" but my wife's did not (becasue she changed it later). So we are still paying the subsidized price for both phones.

      That would also push unlocking.

  9. Huzzah! by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

    Nice to see a carrier doing the right thing. I bought a iPhone 5 unlocked, from Apple (yeah, I know) so that I could use it on T-mobile. I have never had any complaints about T-mobiles service, and I have been with them for a freaking long time.

    --
    Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  10. The only problem is going to be by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    ...the $600 price tags on phones. As a T-Mobile customer, I hope this isn't a sign of them about to go out of business.

    1. Re:The only problem is going to be by geekoid · · Score: 1

      For people who can't afford 600, they have installment plans.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The only problem is going to be by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I'd much rather pay for the phone up front than give the phone company a loan on their terms. This is especially true since the current model is ridiculous. You buy a phone and it is "subsidized" over 2 years. Fine, except that at the end of the 2 years your plan's price doesn't go down to represent the fact that you've paid off the phone. In fact you're stuck paying the subsidy for absolutely no service at all! It's outrageous and they've been getting away with it for decades now. The worst part is that with most companies you can bring your own phone in, and they will still charge you the subsidy anyway. They have only been getting away with it because all of the companies do it so there is no real competition. With T-Mo finally giving people an option, we'll have to see if that particular ripoff can stand.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:The only problem is going to be by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      ...the $600 price tags on phones

      I keep reading about $600 smart phones in stories on this T-Mobile no-contract scheme. You can have an amazing unlocked no-contract quad-core Nexus 4 for $299-349 here. It's HSPA+ which is all you'll get with T-Mobile in most markets anyhow.

      If the best argument against this deal is that unlocked iPhones cost too much then sign me up. Data coverage is the real problem with T-Mobile... but perhaps they're really solving that now.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    4. Re:The only problem is going to be by eudaemon · · Score: 2

      The Nexus 4 does also speak LTE on Band 4, which supposedly T-Mobile supports. You have to downgrade the flash radio on the Nexus 4 because the latest update disabled LTE. Still, just another reason to buy a Nexus 4, besides the smoking price and unlocked/un-carrier-crufted Android OS. The Galaxy IV and HTC One are arguably better if much more expensive phones, but for $299 you're in the territory of what a carrier might charge you to purchase a new device on contract anyway, and you get an unlocked phone instead. I'm hoping Google upgrades the Nexus line again before too long, preferably with a removable battery this time.

    5. Re:The only problem is going to be by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Bingo! that's the problem.

      With 'traditional' plans, you pay just as much after your contract expires and presumably the phone is paid off. In fact, most carriers happily tack on price increases to further offend you. If you just go 1 more year with your tired old phone, you saved $240 or more and have a little bundle to put down on the new one.

      Or, in the current system, go to any of the top 3 and plop down that down payment every two years like clockwork.

      This will also, BTW, change the GSM aftermarket, and third party retailers. I predict massive competition among phone makers. If you could get a phone that was 90% of a Galaxy S4 for say $350, TMO makes this pretty attractive. And if that manufacturer had enough of a clue to avoid a bootlocker and sport over the ROM to the gang at Cyanogen, well, AOSP releases could come out for this every 12 months or less - bingo, new Android close to the same time as the next nexus release, for the old phone you don't have to buy again. Winning?

      Now if only my Sensation 4G hadn't been dropped six feet breaking Wifi AND Bluetooth, and then took an unsanctioned dip in the pool. Alas.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:The only problem is going to be by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      It'll be interesting, that's for sure. It looks like they are basically running a two year interest-free loan on the phone, so still not a bad deal at all. I suspect most users are going to opt for a payment plan on their phone, and from a quick perusal it looks like the most expensive phone is $20/mo. According to this they'll unconditionally unlock a t-mobile phone as soon as it has been paid off.

      I think the biggest challenge is going to be getting people out of the "contract up, time for a new phone" mindset... I mean, sure it can still work with t-mobile (just get a new phone loan one the current one is up), but the main selling point is saving money when the phone is paid off.

      In any case, I give them a thumbs up - as long as they don't drop my year-old low minute/high data plan on me :P

      --
      +1 Disagree
    7. Re:The only problem is going to be by soundguy · · Score: 1

      It's not necessary to buy a $600 phone. I just got a new (not refurb) HTC MyTouch 4G Slider (physical keyboard, 8 mpx camera) at Frye's for $200 outright. It's last year's model, but I was replacing my much older G-1, which is now about 50% phone and 50% dirt & pocket lint and was starting to get flakey.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
  11. They are forced to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are the weakest of the Big 4 and are going all in. I hope it works, if only to keep AT&T / Verizon honest.

    1. Re:They are forced to by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Competition, the finest part of capitalism.

    2. Re:They are forced to by jfern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course having competition requires good regulations. There would be a lot less competition here if the Justice department hadn't successfully blocked AT&T's purchase of T-Mobile.

    3. Re:They are forced to by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't say so. Local regulations and permit procedures are what stop a lot of broadband deployments. Google chose KC for their fiber largely because of the lack of regulation. FIOS deployment has already halted largely due to regulations.

      The regulatory cost puts a heavy thumb on the side of the scale that discourages investment. Indeed, as fellow Forbes contributor Elise Ackerman pointed out last week, Google has explicitly said that part of what made Kansas City attractive was the lack of excessive infrastructure regulation, and the willingness and ability of the city to waive or otherwise expedite the requirements that were on the books.(Despite the city’s promises to bend over backwards for the project, she notes, there have still been expensive regulatory delays that promoted no public values.)

      http://larrydownes.com/what-google-fiber-gig-u-and-us-ignite-teach-us-about-the-painful-cost-of-legacy-regulation/

      Also, capitalism did to microsoft what the government could not: It broke internet explorer's stranglehold on the web, and microsoft's monopoly on the desktop space is quickly falling apart. Although the EU regulations are more stringent, they couldn't get consumers to ultimately decide to switch to another browser when given the choice, until the likes of Firefox and Chrome became what they are today. They also can't get consumers to decide to buy Windows N instead of the non-N editions. Microsoft is annoyed (and rightly so) that they have to keep a separate SKU for it, even while nobody buys it anyways.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    4. Re:They are forced to by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Of course having competition requires good regulations.

      Well, naturally. The government created this concept called the corporation that can grow to some undefined size and can never die. With asset Hoovers like that out there, you need some mechanism to regulate the competition back into the market.

      If all "companies" were individuals or partnerships, I'm not sure that anti-trust laws would be necessary - certainly not at the national level.

      In other words, regulation begets regulation.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:They are forced to by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

      Competition, the good part of capitalism.

      Fixed that for you!

    6. Re:They are forced to by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anti-trust (i.e. competition laws) go back to Roman times, LONG before the modern corporation.

      The Sherman act is based on 16th century common law.

    7. Re:They are forced to by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, you don't need to have a corporation to have collusion.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:They are forced to by trout007 · · Score: 1

      Oh you mean AT&T which benefited from being granted a government monopoly for nearly 100 years?

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    9. Re:They are forced to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed the part about 'good' regulation, right? But you seem to think that all regulation is bad, so that point can never be made with you. Your example about web browsers isn't a very valid comparison with wireless networks, but let's play along. All the alternative browsers only succeeded because they could be installed on Windows. Suppose MS decided that alternate browsers were a 'security risk' or some such, and banned them completely from Windows? How much competition would there be then?

      So the original poster's point is valid; good regulation can encourage competition, just as bad regulation can entrench monopolies and create oligopolies. The devil is in the detail. Nil regulation leads to the Wild West; welcome to Tombstone, pardner!

    10. Re:They are forced to by russotto · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say so. Local regulations and permit procedures are what stop a lot of broadband deployments. Google chose KC for their fiber largely because of the lack of regulation. FIOS deployment has already halted largely due to regulations.

      Much as I dislike regulation, FIOS deployment has halted because Verizon would rather spend the investment on mobile (which has a much higher ROI). It's not that there's no profit in FIOS, it's that there's MORE profit in mobile for the same dollar. And the barriers to entry (including all those regulations) keep (almost) anyone else from entering the fiber market.

    11. Re:They are forced to by Exoman · · Score: 1

      It would be, if there really were competition. As with so much in the U.S., this industry is dominated by a few giants. If there were 5000 companies or even 20 to choose from, we could see real competition. How is it that texting still costs more than voice, when it's a fraction of a percent of the data volume and quality concern? Oligopoly, baby! It's the American way! It will continue to be so, as long as we refuse to enforce antitrust laws, allow corruption of money in politics, and allow for regulatory capture by wealthy corporations.

    12. Re:They are forced to by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      FIOS is halted because the large telcos made deals worth hundreds of billions and then realized they could keep their money without rolling it out. Although states like NJ are supposed to have 45Meg to every household by now - it's in the contracts the telcos signed. Sadly no politician has the gumption to go against such big companies.

  12. Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    However I am somewhat concerned as I have already seen too many people complain that they'd have to foot the bill for the full cost of the phone. The math would may prove to be difficult for people who are not good at it.

    They could phrase it like this:

    Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month for 24 months
    Pay Now: $549

    The down payment on the Pay Later choice would reasonably match the price with contract on other carriers.

    1. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the down payment option is a good deal. However not everybody agrees, and I think the reason why is kind of stupid.

      Techcrunch basically attacks t-mobile over this one because if you want to change carriers, you're still stuck with a $600 (or whatever) phone, as opposed to a $350 early termination fee.

      http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/26/t-mobiles-uncarrier-pricing-isnt-so-different-from-the-contract-devil-you-already-know/

      I'm wondering if they have a bone to pick with t-mobile, because a few hours ago slashdot posted an article from them about how t-mobile UK are scamming customers with premium SMS.

      The only possible way I could see the light in this statement would be if you could bring that phone to any of the other major carriers. Sadly, as far as major carriers, your only other option is AT&T. Though you can get some pretty good deals with the MVNO's, their coverage isn't as good. Personally I'd prefer to just own the phone than be in a contract.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    2. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by slinches · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just checked the plan prices. I compared "unlimited" everything since that's the closest match between features.

      AT&T - unlimited voice $70 + 3GB data $30 + unlimited messaging $20 = $120 per month

      T-Mobile - Unlimited voice, high speed data and messaging $70 + $20 Phone installment plan = $90 per month

      Assuming the down payment on the phone is similar, the T-Mobile plan is ~$700 ($30*24) less over the 2 year AT&T contract. After the phone is paid in full the installment plan ends and saves $50/month over AT&T.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    3. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by mapsjanhere · · Score: 2

      Sure they have a bone to pick. If the service-only model, which is how it's done in the rest of the world btw, wins out in the US people will get used to buy a phone and keep it for years to come. Less people buying the newest gadget every 2 years (with costs buried in a contract for service) means less advertising. Plus the carrier competition will go away too, carriers will start advertising service differences in main stream media instead of "only at XYZ the jphone 6gsl430" in the tech media.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    4. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by krelvin · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what they are doing though depending on the device the per month is different. Example .. Samsung Galaxy Note 2 $199.99 + $20 for 24 months OR $679.99

    5. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by Yaur · · Score: 1, Informative

      Similar plan at Verizon... unlimited talk, text, and 500MB of data is $60. BYOD/no contract.

    6. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the down payment option is a good deal. However not everybody agrees, and I think the reason why is kind of stupid.

      Techcrunch basically attacks t-mobile over this one because if you want to change carriers, you're still stuck with a $600 (or whatever) phone, as opposed to a $350 early termination fee.

      http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/26/t-mobiles-uncarrier-pricing-isnt-so-different-from-the-contract-devil-you-already-know/

      I'm wondering if they have a bone to pick with t-mobile, because a few hours ago slashdot posted an article from them about how t-mobile UK are scamming customers with premium SMS.

      The only possible way I could see the light in this statement would be if you could bring that phone to any of the other major carriers. Sadly, as far as major carriers, your only other option is AT&T. Though you can get some pretty good deals with the MVNO's, their coverage isn't as good. Personally I'd prefer to just own the phone than be in a contract.

      Galaxy SIII on Verizon $199 + $350 ETF reduced by $10/month
      Galaxy SIII on T-Mobile: $549 or $69 + $20/month for 24 months = $549

      If you break your Verizon contract in the first month, your phone cost is $199 + $350 for the phone, or $549
      If you break you T-Mobile contract in the first month, your phone cost is $69 + 20*24 = $549

      If you break your Verizon contract after 6 months, you owe $350 - ($10*6) = $290 to break your contract
      If you break your T-mobile contract after 6 months, you owe 18 * $20 = $360 to break your contract

      If you break your Verizon contract after 12 months, you owe $350 - ($10*12) = $230 to break your contract
      If you break your T-mobile contract after 12 months, you own 12 * $12 = $240 to break your contract

      However, in the last 2 cases, you saved $130 on the price of the phone so you still break even or come out ahead.

      And, at the end of the payback term, if you stay with T-Mobile, you save $20/month since the phone's paid off, but with VErizon you keep paying the same amount.

    7. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by todrules · · Score: 1

      "Yaaaay, Math!" (Shameless Breaking Bad quote.) Seeing that this is Slashdot, I would have thought that the GP would have actually done the math himself instead of just blindly quoting some sensationalist blog site. Thans for taking the time to post that.

    8. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      pricewise, consider virginmobile. got unlimited data/text (+300 min voice) with'em for $25/month...works great everywhere I tried (works most places I tried---certainly in all population centers).

    9. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by jxander · · Score: 2

      The biggest difference at this point is precedent and legality.

      Other networks are doing everything they can to make it illegal for you to break contract and take your phone with you. T-Mobile's stance, with this latest announcement, seems to be a much more reasonable "It's your phone, do what you want," (with the obvious CDMA/GSM limitations.)

      --
      This signature is false.
    10. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Verizon BYOD. lol

    11. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I was actually in agreement with what he said anyways, but it occurred to me about a minute later with regard to the up front cost of the Verizon phone. Can't edit posts after they are submitted though, so I just let it be.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    12. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by Eil · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile - Unlimited voice, high speed data and messaging $70 + $20 Phone installment plan = $90 per month

      At $90/month, it's still twice the cost of Straight Talk on the same network. (Although no doubt T-Mobile has better customer support.)

    13. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      I think the down payment option is a good deal. However not everybody agrees, and I think the reason why is kind of stupid.

      Techcrunch basically attacks t-mobile over this one because if you want to change carriers, you're still stuck with a $600 (or whatever) phone, as opposed to a $350 early termination fee.

      http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/26/t-mobiles-uncarrier-pricing-isnt-so-different-from-the-contract-devil-you-already-know/

      I'm wondering if they have a bone to pick with t-mobile, because a few hours ago slashdot posted an article from them about how t-mobile UK are scamming customers with premium SMS.

      The only possible way I could see the light in this statement would be if you could bring that phone to any of the other major carriers. Sadly, as far as major carriers, your only other option is AT&T. Though you can get some pretty good deals with the MVNO's, their coverage isn't as good. Personally I'd prefer to just own the phone than be in a contract.

      They are being dishonest. The termination fee partially recoups the unpaid portion of the customer's phone. The cost of early termination is more than $350 when the down payment for the phone is factored in. For example, the typical smart phone cost the customer $200 out of pocket plus a two year contract. If the customer breaks their contract their total cost would be $200 that they paid for the phone + $350 early termination fee = $550. So, the cost to the customer is the same under both scenarios. Also, the Nexus 4 costs $299 and $350; so, in many situations the cost to the customer is no more than the termination fee of all the major carriers.

    14. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind you compared an unlimited data plan to a 3GB data plan. The 2GB data plan for T-Mobile is only $10/month.

      Oh, I've found that T-Mobile has much better family plans as well. For $120/month you can have four phones with unlimited calling and 2GB data on two of them. For ATT that would be around $200/month. Oh, and it still is apples and oranges as T-Mo is now throwing in 500MB on all lines and NO overage fees (it just drops to 2G). ATT would charge $240/mo to bump the other two lines up to only 200MB and if you get one too many emails, say hello to per-MB pricing.

      In my experience T-Mobile is way cheaper in just about every way these days. Their only issue is coverage, but even on vacation I haven't found it to be bad. I live in a suburb.

    15. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by tepples · · Score: 1

      got unlimited data/text (+300 min voice) with'em for $25/month

      I thought the $25/month promotion was for a limited time, and it starts at $35 now, with the handset not portable to any other carrier.

    16. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by nategasser · · Score: 1

      > And, at the end of the payback term, if you stay with T-Mobile, you save $20/month since the phone's paid off, but with VErizon you keep paying the same amount.

      Except, at the end of 2 years, you want a new phone so you start over with paying the full price.

    17. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by hawguy · · Score: 1

      > And, at the end of the payback term, if you stay with T-Mobile, you save $20/month since the phone's paid off, but with VErizon you keep paying the same amount.

      Except, at the end of 2 years, you want a new phone so you start over with paying the full price.

      Lots of people keep their phone until it dies, not everyone needs the latest and greatest.

      My Galaxy Nexus is about 18 months old and the only reason I'd replace it after my contract term is up is to move away from Verizon to a cheaper carrier - it does everything I need. The only reason I replaced my 2 year old original Droid was because the screen started flashing when I slid the keyboard out. Since the Galaxy Nexus has no moving parts (well, except a couple buttons) and has a replaceable battery, I expect it to last a lot longer.

    18. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by Plekto · · Score: 1

      This of course assumes that you are yet another sheep who thinks that the only phone in the universe is an Apple product.

      The real savings comes if you are smart and get an Android type device for $100 from a place that just sells phones (unlocked, no less). Then you have no contract and no payments, either. For the price of the old down-payment, you simply own the phone outright and get the $50 a month service. Win-win.

      That the IPhone costs $650 is Apple's decision. In reality, it costs $200 to build. If you don't mind it not saying Apple on the front, you can get a phone made in the same area in China (where all the phones are made, sort of their version of Silicon Valley) for $150. The apps are now virtually identical on both markets anyways.

      If you go to Europe, it's already like this. You buy an unlocked quad band phone and use it with whatever carrier you want. If you go to another country, you simply pop in a sim card and use it on that network. No idiocy, no hair-pulling. You don't buy an AT&T anything. You buy a Nokia or a Sony or a LG and use it with your carrier, the same as you buy a laptop and plug it into your internet when you get home.

      Note - if you buy an iPhone anyways from T-Mobile, it's going to be unlocked/not tied to their service. That's a small plus as well, since it's not an option with AT&T.

    19. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      A 600 dollar phone you could sell on ebay for 200.

    20. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by tepples · · Score: 1

      This of course assumes that you are yet another sheep who thinks that the only phone in the universe is an Apple product.

      Where did I say Apple? High-end Android phones, such as the Galaxy S 4, can be just as expensive as any iPhone.

      The apps are now virtually identical on both markets anyways.

      The most popular third-party applications are on both platforms, but there are a few notable exceptions. I'm told that games from established developers tend to hit iOS first and Android later if at all, and some applications are Android-exclusive by Apple's choice.

    21. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by Plekto · · Score: 1

      True. But those are games. The reviews and analysis by the ENTIRE media assumes that it's all about the iPhone. And how it's no "savings" at all versus the other providers. Also how T-Mobile has slower speeds and isn't as bleeding-edge.

      And then there's the rest of us who see unlocked/jailbroken/etc phones of all shapes and sizes for cheap. With reasonable enough speed. And unlimited calls. Think about that. When was the last time any major carrier offered $50 unlimited calls? Let alone tossing a completely reasonable amount of data in on top of it?

      I think it will force the competition to adjust their prices. And quickly.

    22. Re:Pay Later: $199 down + $15/month by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      The $25/month wasn't a limited time promotion, it used be the standard price for their low-minute plan. However, you're correct that they've raised it to $35/month and their handsets are not portable.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  13. Just wait.. by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they really were thinking about customers, the contract would be a no-penalty cancel-anytime-you-want contract that would lock you in for a specific price for a non-trivial amount of time.

    I'm skeptical and will stick with AT&T out of laziness for a while. Prove me wrong T-Mobile and I'll switch. But even though cellular has been one-sided customer-screwing contracts since the inception of the service - contracts can actually protect _both_ parties if you do them right. No contract == No guarantee.

    1. Re:Just wait.. by chiefmojorising · · Score: 1

      You mean like what they just announced? You can either buy the phone up front or finance it over a two year period. You're not locked into a contract for long term service with them but you can bet your ass there's a contract involved. You *do* have to pay for your merchandise whether you're getting your service with them or another carrier.

    2. Re:Just wait.. by organgtool · · Score: 1

      I think what the OP was saying is that with a contract, you could be guaranteed a specific monthly price for the duration of the contract. With the program that T-Mobile just announced, you could buy a phone outright that only works on their network and then they could stick you with a huge price hike the following month.

    3. Re:Just wait.. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure what you're getting at here. The problem is that there isn't a contract to begin with? That *is* what t-mobile is doing here; there is no contract. I'd see not having a contract as an advantage. Bring your existing AT&T phone over and try it out. Service doesn't work for you? Go ahead and return to AT&T at any time you'd like.

      As I experienced with sprint, a contract doesn't guarantee quality of service. Like the t-mobile CEO said in his press conference: When you're in a contract, the carrier only has to be nice to you once every 23 months.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    4. Re:Just wait.. by chiefmojorising · · Score: 1

      The phone is unlocked from day one, so you can switch any time. But yeah, they could certainly raise their rates from one month to another. Probably not the smartest business decision to raise rates like that but it is possible.

    5. Re:Just wait.. by organgtool · · Score: 1

      I guess you could take your phone over to AT&T and use it on their 2G network. Ever since 3G, each carrier uses their own set of spectrum, so a smartphone is really only usable for the carrier in which it was produced.

    6. Re:Just wait.. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      Oh you stupid Americans make me laugh :)
      Put the koolaid aside and learn something ;) many phones cover a wide range of frequencies these days ;)

      (of course there are non stupid americans also...)

    7. Re:Just wait.. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile's prepaid plan prices haven't changed noticeably in the couple of years I've been with them. They're not launching some new discount bait and switch plan, they're just trying to draw attention to the prepaid plans they've had all along by ceasing to offer the contract alternatives.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    8. Re:Just wait.. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      It's a gsm/umts phone, which is easy to move to another carrier, you simply replace the Sim card. No reconfiguration, flashing, or hacks off any kind, just swap it out and you are on another carrier.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    9. Re:Just wait.. by soundguy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and that means the next time they have a megasale price reduction across the board to bump the numbers at the end of a problematic quarter, YOU don't get to take advantage of the new prices because your 2-year contract locks you into the HIGHER rate.

      Private contracts can be good for both parties. A contract between a private individual and a public corporation ALWAYS results in the advantage going to the corporation because the individual has NO say in the contract language.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    10. Re:Just wait.. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      There is always a contract, only with this one the minimum duration is one month instead of two years.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    11. Re:Just wait.. by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      I've been with them for 2 years without a contract (they used to hide the option in the past, and they didn't allow you to pay for the phone over time). Not once have they changed my plan, features, or my monthly charges. The only thing that changed was my 3rd party insurance plan reduced their coverage.

      The great thing about T-Mobile phones from 2 years ago was that they weren't crippled. They allowed the portable wifi hotspot feature out of the box, without any extra charge. And they included a "call out over wifi" option for people in a bad coverage area (though that didn't fix incoming calls).

    12. Re:Just wait.. by chiefmojorising · · Score: 1

      For existing iPhones, yes, that's true. They're going to be selling a new version of the iPhone 5 with will work with multiple carriers, though.

  14. Re:US cellular is a rip-off by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Lobbying, mostly. The barrier to starting a new mobile telco (or even a traditional ISP) is massive, although the limited availability of spectrum is also a problem. If you are not familiar with the concept of lobbying, that is because it is known as corruption in most other countries.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  15. Re:Subsidization by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

    Is ending subsidization really going to appeal to the mass consuming public? How many teenagers have $650 for a new iPhone? You'd think they'd offer some kind of optional secondary loan plan where you pay off a little bit every month, or owe the whole amount if you want to change carriers.

    you didn't even need to click into the article to see that is exactly what they are doing, summary itself says

    To keep customers from having to front the full cost of the phone with unsubsidized plans, they'll let people pay off phones in installments.[

  16. Re:Subsidization by geekoid · · Score: 2

    If only there as an article that talks about T-Mobile doing that very thing~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. Re:Tethering by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Tethering is only included in the limited plans.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  18. Re:Memo to Slashdot's Tech Staff: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I second that. Also can someone find the asshat that is posting this shit and BREAK HIS FUCKING LEGS?

    Or, y'know, you could chill the fuck out and ignore him. I browse at 0 all the time (with ACs like me down to -1 by default), and I wouldn't have even seen any trace of this thread if you didn't open your goddamned mouth. Now, thanks to you, there's a post on this thread that started at 1 and that some asshole moderator actually modded UP to 2, leaving an abbreviated message link that points everyone to the damn thread. So yeah. Way to fucking go, dipshit.

  19. But does it have the same limitations as pre-paid? by m3000 · · Score: 1

    I left T-Mobile at the end of last year when my contract expired, and have been using the MVNOs that use the T-Mobile airwaves on pre-paid (PTel specifically) to save money. It's been working well, and was much cheaper than T-Mobile's previous pre-paid offerings for what I needed. However I discovered there's some missing features that pre-paid doesn't give you and no one really points out until you already switched:
    * no call forwarding (for google voice voicemail)
    * no visual voicemail
    * no short code sms texting (except often they'll allow Twitter and Facebook)

    Now that T-Mobile's prices are more in line with their MVNOs (and cheaper if you have multiple lines) and they don't even offer contracts, does this mean all those features that you lost going pre-paid would be available again? While none of those features would have been worth the extra cost of a contract, it would be a great reason to pick T-Mobile over the other smaller pre-paid operators. I'll have to call them and see if their CSRs even know the answers to these questions (I doubt it yet, someone will have to be the guinea pig), but it does make me want to switch back if that's the case.

  20. Re:Subsidization by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

    Reading is *hard*!

    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
  21. Spectrum cartel by tepples · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is this? Other than 'muricans are dim fucks that put up with any shit?

    The problem is that one can't just start his own cell phone network, with blackjack and hookers, because an oligopoly of four companies have snapped up effectively all the spectrum in the cellular bands. One must either put up with what the spectrum cartel offers or do without cellular service. If you believe I've presented a false dilemma, please feel free to explain your third option.

    1. Re:Spectrum cartel by SolitaryMan · · Score: 2

      This is the most creative use of citations I've seen today.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    2. Re:Spectrum cartel by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

      Two TV Tropes links? That poor bastard, he won't be productive for a week and a half.

  22. Re:Subsidization by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Umm, yeah. That's exactly what they do.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  23. Now is the time for SUPPORT by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's check out the fine print (is unlimited data really unlimited? etc., etc.) but if T-Mobile is honestly offering unlimited calls, data, tethering, and text without a contract then NOW you can vote with your dollars and switch. If you miss this opportunity to support them on this and send a real message to the other carriers, then you have no right to complain about the state of cell phone service in the US.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Sprint has had unlimited everything for a long time at a pretty good price too. You could have sent a message for years now. Did you?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I wholly agree, and while they're definitely ahead in the ways that you've specified, they're still far behind in the most important one: coverage.

      It doesn't matter if you're offering a super car with infinite fuel at the price of a family car if there are no roads to drive it on. As someone who suffered through three years of having the majority of calls either drop or simply not come through at all as one of their customers, and who continues to hear stories that mirror my own experiences from people that are current customers in my area (despite T-Mobile having had six years to fix things since the time that I left), I can say that I won't be returning to their fold anytime soon.

      And it's a darn shame, really, since I don't like my current carrier and would switch to T-Mobile in a heartbeat if they could provide decent coverage in my area. These new plans they're offering are exactly the sort of thing I'm looking for.

    3. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      It's not just the unlimited stuff that he's talking about. He's also talking about the lack of contract and the fact that the subsidy for the phone is actually an installment plan, rather than an excuse to increase the built-in cost of the plan while never reducing it, even after the phone has been more than paid for. Sprint still engages in that practice and still locks you in to contracts.

    4. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong but you can't tether on the unlimited data plan. So you can use unlimited data on your phone or you need one of the bundles of data plans to use tethering.

    5. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      For me, sprint's network was painfully slow. I live in the 6th largest city in the US, where sprint offers no 4g coverage. Worse, their 4g is slower than T-Mobile 3g, and their 3g is slower than edge.

      Also, with sprint I paid $300 a month for 1500 minutes and unlimited but painfully slow data. With T-Mobile I pay $120 for superior service. I wouldn't dare say sprint has a better price.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    6. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Well, speaking only for myself, after ~14 years of sending "messages" to Sprint with my dollars, I finally left in disgust over their dysfunctional 28kbps so-called 3G and loss of 4G for some unknown length of time greater than at least 3 months if I dumped my newly-crippled (by Motorola's infamous "May Surprise" bootloader permalock) for a Sprint Galaxy S3. Finding out that their *goal* for 4g was 6mbps was the straw that broke the camel's back.

        I pay ~$20/month more to AT&T, and it's worth every penny. Android phones, in particular, don't work well when they're "connected", but have almost no actual working "connectivity"... and with Sprint, it happened *all the time*. I called it, "5 bars and 5k(bps)". August 2012 was the worst... 20% of Sprint's towers down here were like wireless access points that were powered up, but not actually connected to a working network.

      AT&T might be expensive and legislatively-evil, but damn, 28mbps (vs Sprint's 28Kbps) is a nice consolation prize.

    7. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Or, you can look at these plans and get 2.5gb data, unlimited talk, unlimited text, for 60$/mo, no commitment.

      Been on that plan for over a year now. These plans aren't new, just previously burried.

    8. Re:Now is the time for SUPPORT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Let's check out the fine print (is unlimited data really unlimited? etc., etc.) but if T-Mobile is honestly offering unlimited calls, data, tethering, and text without a contract then NOW you can vote with your dollars and switch.

      T-Mobile has for some time had a no-contract plan where you pay $2 on any day on which you use your phone, which provides unlimited (throttled after the first whatever) internet access. Dunno about tethering on that plan, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. So glad they weren't allowed to merge with AT& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope the FTC takes note of this. Good things are happening because companies have to innovate to compete instead of take refuge in mega-mergers.

  25. Expand Coverage by wile_e8 · · Score: 1

    Great. Now all they need to do is expand coverage - as much as I want to switch from Verizon to T-Mobile, it won't do me much good if half the time I can't get a signal.

    Question for anyone with T-Mobile currently: I've been talking with my wife about switching to the prepaid, 100 minutes/month, unlimited text/data plan, but a big hangup is that her hometown is in the "Service Partner" coverage area on the T-Mobile coverage map. What data speeds/caps do the prepaid plans in service partner areas, if they are allowed to use data at all?

    1. Re:Expand Coverage by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I'm on that very plan. I don't have a certain answer for you, but I *believe* if you're not on the T-Mobile network itself, you'll still be able to text and talk, but data won't work. This is from what I recall when I set up my plan. I know for certain I can talk and text off of T-mobile's network without any added costs, but I've never really tried to use data off-network.

      It's a great deal if it works out, but I worry you're out of luck on this one.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    2. Re:Expand Coverage by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Coverage in extended service areas is very inconsistent. You would really need to get a t mo subscriber in your town to get a good answer.

      Me? On T Mo's 60/mo prepaid 2.5gb + unlimited talk + unlimited text plan. (Made the splurge to get the better service for 10$.)

      It works fantastic in the city I work in (smexy 4g speeds!). Edge and gsm voice service only out in the sticks where I live, provided through a roaming partner. As such, I use wifi calling and a wireless router. Works great. It doesn't handle call handoffs well though, so finish your call before leaving the house.

      Find somebody in your town on T-mo and get a real site assesment before investing though. Good advice is to splurge for a quadband handset, since you never know.

  26. Teathering is NOT unlimited by Burning1 · · Score: 2

    I am currently a T-mobile customer, and had a chance to look over the plans. Very excited by this new approach, and hope other providers follow suit.

    It's important to note however that tethering (Smartphone Mobile HotSpot, or SMH) is not unlimited, even with the unlimited data plans. The unlimited data plan included 500MB of tethered data, and you can buy more (apparently for $10 per 2GB, but not confirmed.) If you're primarily interested in tethered data, it might make sense to buy the 2.5GB plan, which costs $10 less, and includes 2.5GB of tethered data.

    Unfortunately, it looks like T-mobile may be eliminating some of it's other low cost plans with this move. My current plan is $30/mo for more 1500 talk/text minutes, and 30MB of data. 30MB is enough to check a map when I need it, and I can use wifi for my typical data use.

    If you have concerns about T-Mobile's coverage, you can supplement it by purchasing an inexpensive daily use phone from Verizon. Pay $2/day when you're traveling outside a T-Mobile coverage zone.

    1. Re:Teathering is NOT unlimited by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      There's a pretty trivial hack to disable TMoUS's ability to detect tethering, so unless they've changed how they do that the nominal limit on tethering is irrelevant. Basically, use a "custom" APN that just happens to be the normal phone-data APN. The default configuration uses a different APN for tethered data, which they use to track your usage. By setting the custom APN, all data is routed through there and treated as phone data.

      The $30/mo for 1500min plan is still available, it's just been relegated to relatively small print near the bottom of the page. http://prepaid-phones.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans still lists it (and the $30 for unlimited texts and data, 100min talk) though, as well as the new plans. You just have to scroll down a bit.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    2. Re:Teathering is NOT unlimited by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There's a pretty trivial hack to disable TMoUS's ability to detect tethering, so unless they've changed how they do that the nominal limit on tethering is irrelevant. Basically, use a "custom" APN that just happens to be the normal phone-data APN. The default configuration uses a different APN for tethered data, which they use to track your usage. By setting the custom APN, all data is routed through there and treated as phone data.

      I would assume that this is already setup that way if you bring your own device, rather than buying one from them?

  27. Competition at last? by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    FINALLY, it would appear the free market is starting to work its magic. It's almost inevitable that phone calls and mobile internet access will be free or almost next to free some day. That day appears a little sooner thanks to this news.

    However, I still think it should be a government service, since like roads, it's basic infrastructure. Maybe the government and Google (for the expertise) can get together at some point to make that work.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  28. Love my Pay as you Go by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    No contracts may open the door for me to see what offerings they have. I'm never going to sign a 2 year contract for anything ever again. Burned by those a couple times, that's it. They're simply a legal document allowing a company to take money from me for service I haven't used.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  29. 500MB. I go through that in a few days.... by anubi · · Score: 2

    I used to go through 500MB easily in one surfing session before NoScript. Webmasters using modern tools think nothing of sending you whatever you will accept, such as a ten megabyte video streaming file to open up and play on the side as an ad for cars or some movie trailer...

    Once people begin being charged for this, they are apt to adopt technologies which block ads, and webmasters-paid by the ad transmitted-will do all in their power to send anything only after they have confirmed the ad streams are transferring. Many business sites have already adopted such technology, and they will be very expensive to visit.

    I would almost like to see NoScript start flashing a dollar sign next to sites which need to be enabled. Then load the executive computers with NoScript so the executives who hired the webmaster will see what their customers are seeing. One of the biggest problems we have had on the internet is the executives are generally running on high-speed local networks using a monolithic browsing system and do not get a true "customer experience" when visiting their own site.

    But it can also be argued that the CEO of large corporations time is too valuable to be wasted having a customer experience.

    I wonder if the next big wave of lawsuits will be over people "stealing" content from the web because they adopted ad-refusal technologies.

    I have already lived long enough to see lawsuits where unauthorized access to as little as a song invoked thousands of dollars in legal fees, while tax havens specifically crafted to avoid tax collections, operating in the Caribbean and Indonesian islands, continue to operate. This one-sided law is wearing heavily on my respect for law - its seeming more and more like organized muggery every day.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  30. Aww, lower priced plans are gone now. by ibneko · · Score: 1

    I'm on their older prepaid (no-contract) plan. $30/mo for 100 minutes, unlimited text, and unlimited data (first 5GB at best speeds, then down to Edge). Kinda sad that it's gone now.

    1. Re:Aww, lower priced plans are gone now. by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      It is still there, according to their webpage. You have to go to the prepaid plans section to see it.

  31. Contraditory fine print by erice · · Score: 1

    From the t-mobile web page, below the big banner saying "No annual contract":

    General Terms: At participating locations. Domestic only. Credit approval, $35/line activation fee, and two-year contract with up to $200/line early cancellation fee required; deposit may apply. If you switch plans you may be bound by existing or extended term (including early cancellation provisions) and/or charged an up to $200 fee. You may be unable to switch to some plans.

    Maybe it's just a glitch but I wouldn't bank on it.

    For what it's worth: I'm a T-mobile customer. This new deal would cost me $5/month more than I pay now. It would get more but it's more than I don't actually use.

    1. Re:Contraditory fine print by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      The word "year" doesn't appear anywhere on the page you linked (at least for me, and as of posting). My guess is it was some boilerplate that didn't get replaced when it should have.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  32. lying liars by mesocosm · · Score: 1

    I'd feel more confidence in their announcement if I hadn't recently abandoned a dispute with T-Mobile, after they unilaterally changed the terms of my contract. I was promised on three separate occasions by T-Mobile staff that I could change my minutes/month plan at any time without any fees or changes to my plan, until I actually tried to do it. Then, surprise! they changed that clause, and now I'd have to restart my contract over with a new 24-month commitment. When I asked to talk to their service department, I was given a physical address and told that the post is the only way to contact them. And would you believe they never wrote me back? I'm used to dealing with soulless bureaucrats at big companies like this, but the level of disregard and complete indifference I was shown by T-Mobile was something very special.

  33. Re:Good for both sides if done right by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

    Most likely they won't make any money from interest. The money comes from selling the phone at MSRP instead of discounted or even from the marketing budget as it really is an alternate (but more consumer friendly) way of locking you in for 2 years. Charging a separate line item for interest would be silly from a marketing perspective.

  34. There's a map for that by tepples · · Score: 1

    carriers will start advertising service differences in main stream media

    You mean like Verizon's "there's a map for that" ads, back when AT&T was still EDGE-only in a lot of markets, followed by AT&T's Christo-inspired ads?

  35. Re:US cellular is a rip-off by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2

    In case you haven't noticed (by reading the summary) you can now do these things with t-mobile.

    http://www.justsaypictures.com/images/stupid-europeans-or-are-they-americans.jpg

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  36. Re:But does it have the same limitations as pre-pa by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    I'd say so. I just switched to the new plan this morning. I still even have roaming access, which I *think* (correct me if I'm wrong) isn't available on MVNO's.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  37. US Price Plans..... by paulmac84 · · Score: 2

    ..... are shockingly expensive.

    It amazes me that in the US you're expected to pay extra for voicemail, SMS packages, tethering etc. These are the basic services that make even a dumb phone usable. Without them, you may as well be sending smoke signals.

    I'm currently with 3 Ireland. I paid €100 for my HTC Explorer. I pay €20 per month for unlimited SMS messages, unlimited data, unlimited calls to numbers on the same network, unlimited weekend calls to any number. Every time I top up by €20, I get €10 free credit. I get free tethering to my laptop. The only time my credit is used is when I call numbers during the week that aren't on the 3 network.

    Ireland is a small country with four main networks. Competition is pretty tough, but having a mobile phone is pretty cheap. My 8 year old nieces and nephews have their own phones, and pay for the majority of their credit themselves from pocket money etc.

    --
    One of the universal rules of happiness is always be wary of any helpful item that weighs less than its operating manual
    1. Re:US Price Plans..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My 8 year old nieces and nephews have their own phones, and pay for the majority of their credit themselves from pocket money etc.

      Yeah, but it's a drag waiting tables when you're only four feet tall.

    2. Re:US Price Plans..... by jonpublic · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Ireland is a small country" explains part of the issue of why it costs so much here.

      The U.S. is physically huge. Ireland is about the size of one of 50 of the states. Takes a lotta dough to to build a network across the U.S. That and our regulators aren't empowered to stop companies from ripping us off.

      http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Nobodys-Doing-The-Math-On-Verizon-Mystery-Fee-Scandal-110725

    3. Re:US Price Plans..... by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Prepaid t-mo sims are good for this. Just be sure your phone likes the odd band combination first, and that your handset is unlocked. (Being from europe, I assume yours already is.)

      Just pop the sim in, ad enjoy the prepaid service. Tmo doesn't give a rats about who made your phone or what FW you are running on it.

    4. Re:US Price Plans..... by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      By European standards the US is mostly uninhabited. There are very few uncovered spots in Europe and you mostly get at least 2-3 carriers.
      In the US....not so much. Take a look at a light map of mainland North America and yo will see why a lot of it isn't fully covered.

      Also remember that in Europe things like these are fiercely watched. If a bunch of telcos carved up the place into bits and agreed not to sriously compete they'd be in a proper spot of bother on a national and on an EU level. Fines tend not to be a mere slap on the wrist.
      OTOH LTE hasn't yet really taken off, either.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    5. Re:US Price Plans..... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      India is a large country but we still pay way less then USA citizens.

      That's because they know you don't have money, and they know we do. Whatever the market will bear! Isn't capitalism grand?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:US Price Plans..... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Good example.. T-Mobile has coverage only in the largest city in my state, Iowa. The rest is "partner". That means my current prepaid provider that just moved to T-Mobile's network will no longer work for me. I am hoping they refund me any unused credit when they cut off Sprint. (strangely enough, the largest provider in the US, Verizon, doesn't have coverage in the small town I live in, so their MVNO's are not an option either.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  38. And yet, no international data option by VP · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The carrier who would be best positioned (at least in Europe) to offer a decent data roaming option due to their relationship with the German carrier of the same name, and who partially owns them, only provides the insane price of $15 per MB (yes, per megabyte) for international data roaming. For comparison, Verizon and AT&T provide 100 MB for $20...

    1. Re:And yet, no international data option by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Anyone with a GSM phone who isn't buying a SIM when they visit another country is probably doing things wrong. T-Mobile is GSM, so...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  39. Re:Subsidization by linuxguy · · Score: 2

    "You'd think they'd offer some kind of optional secondary loan plan where you pay off a little bit every month"

    Oh man. You deserve every bit of ridicule that comes your way.

  40. Banks by robmv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is not it the job of banks to lend money? Use your credit card to finance your purchase. If you have no financial credit and you don't have a credit card, why are you buying expensive gadgets?, buy a simple phone because obviously you should not be wasting money on them

    1. Re:Banks by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      Is not it the job of banks to lend money? Use your credit card to finance your purchase. If you have no financial credit and you don't have a credit card, why are you buying expensive gadgets?, buy a simple phone because obviously you should not be wasting money on them

      Yeah? And what bank/credit card do you know of that will finance $480 over 2 years and not charge interest?

    2. Re:Banks by robmv · · Score: 1

      I don't know about USA rates, but a 25$ monthly payment sounds like equivalent of the extra money you waste paying a forced expensive plan

    3. Re:Banks by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      The job of a bank is to make money, as with any commercial entity :). Lending money, an screwing depositors is just how banks usually go about it, but sometimes they can foreclose on a well paid on property and jack up the legal fees to eat all the equity, so they do have other nice little streams of revenue :P

  41. Capitalism works despite regulation by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Troll

    Of course having competition requires good regulations.

    Utterly wrong, and ignorant of the very definition of "competition". Usually regulation works to PREVENT competition by helping a large entity prevent smaller competitors from succeeding.

    the Justice department hadn't successfully blocked AT&T's purchase of T-Mobile.

    In that case it weakened the ability of T-Mobile and AT&T to compete well with Verizon. Healthy competition is not about the sheer quantity of competitors.

    AT&T claims the cap on data use was a direct result of the merger being prevented. How did that regulatory action "help" AT&T customers?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Capitalism works despite regulation by bored · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Utterly wrong, and ignorant of the very definition of "competition". Usually regulation works to PREVENT competition by helping a large entity prevent smaller competitors from succeeding.

      Maybe, i'm feeding the troll here, but its pretty much impossible to study business/economics and not discover abuse of monopoly power, price fixing, collusion, and dozens of other practices that are outlawed because they allow a larger competitor to simply crush any upstarts. The GP is right, competition requires regulation to assure a level playing field. That regulation can be used to lock upstarts out of a field is just another case of monopoly abuse. The wierd thing is that there is plenty of "regulations" that could be repealed (see real-estate agents/broker laws for example) but that isn't the regulation that is being repealed. Instead its regulation to assure that I can't dump toxic sludge into the local creek thereby shifting a cost of business onto society.

    2. Re:Capitalism works despite regulation by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To expand on what bored is saying.

      Regulation can be used to restrict competition to the insiders. Real Estate is a good example. Most states require licensed realtors to offer Cadillac services – which means nobody offers a striped down version – which is why commissions are uniformly high.

      On the other hand, regulation can be used to bring down the barriers to entry – see the internet. Telecom firms were required to wire up and transmit data regardless of who provided the equipment or services. Regulation helps when one side/group has a significant edge over consumers or other outside producers.

      So regulation is neither good nor bad – it is how it used. (FYI, I prefer less regulation then more)

    3. Re:Capitalism works despite regulation by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      AT&T claims the cap on data use was a direct result of the merger being prevented. How did that regulatory action "help" AT&T customers?

      AT&T started capping data years before they tried to buy T-Mobile.

    4. Re:Capitalism works despite regulation by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2

      Of course having competition requires good regulations.

      Utterly wrong, and ignorant of the very definition of "competition".

      You are utterly wrong. Without regulation there would be no capitalism.

      In the early industrial revolution of Britain it was the wild west of commerce. Rival companies could mimic the packaging of quality brands. It was also said some vendors would dust used tea leaves in lead to make them look new again to resell. These were all practices to mislead the consumer.

      Sure, caveat emptor. But if the consumer is continually mislead how can they make valid choices and how can the invisible hand work. There needs to be some regulation to ensure capitalism works.

    5. Re:Capitalism works despite regulation by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > How did that regulatory action "help" AT&T customers?

      By keeping T-mobile independent, so it can do stuff like this & allow us to have an open GSM network that doesn't limit phone choice (Sprint) or lock down its bootloaders (Verizon) to flee to if we decide we're annoyed by AT&T.

    6. Re:Capitalism works despite regulation by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Deregulation like the 1996 telco reform act helped spawn the ISP industry and is responsible for making the 'net ubiquitous. Then telecom firms got rid of the pesky rules requiring them to provide open access to competitors when the FCC was ran by Powel's son under Bush Jr. The thousands of ISPs across the country died because wholesale costs to lines were more expensive as the telcos were charging for retail. Kill the competition and force the clients back to the monopolies all through regulation. Corporatism is bad for consumers.

    7. Re:Capitalism works despite regulation by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      First of all, no states that I am aware of require licensed "Realtors." Realtor is a trademark term for members of the National Association of Realtors, a trade organization. States require licensed real estate agents in order to sell real estate on behalf of others. You are perfectly welcome to sell your own home and save the commission. The licensing requirement is to prevent dumbasses from having their life savings extracted from them by con artists or worse, other dumbasses trying to help a friend sell their home.

      Licensed real estate agents are required to know the law and legal requirements which most home sellers are totally ignorant of. You are right about one thing. It does weed out the retards who can't add two numbers with the help of a calculator or remember which HUD form is required for the title agency to close the loan.

      When purchasing or disposing of the largest asset AND liability on my balance sheet, I think I'd like an insider navigating me through the ropes so I don't end up on the wrong end of a lawsuit because the other party was unhappy that I forgot something.

  42. Re:Good for both sides if done right by eudaemon · · Score: 1

    T-mobile wants $457.99 for a Nexus 4 if purchased outright or $49.99 down and $17/mo for 24 months, which adds up to precisely 457.99. So they aren't charging interest, although they are charging a $108.99 premium over the Google Play store, which is definitely a stupid carrier trick. Either that or Google is subsidizing the phones to consumers.

  43. Re:Tethering by Rogue+Haggis+Landing · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was wondering about that because the 500MB is labelled high speed. So is it unlimited 3G and 500MB of 4G? Or what?

    The base plan is 500 MB of LTE/HSPA+/3G (whatever you can get where you are), then it's throttled to 2G/EDGE once you go past that. I like that in this situation. T-Mobile is advertising the amount of high speed data in big letters, rather than in the small text under the words "unlimited data". They're also making overage costs disappear. And you can pay for unlimited high speed data, and for unlimited high speed data with tethering, and less exorbitant than usual rates.

    It's really good that one of the big carriers are doing something different. I hope it works out for them.

  44. IPv6 at T-Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And, T-Mobile supports IPv6.

  45. Don't get used to it by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    This will set in motion for T-Mobile to be bought out by someone else so that the other carriers and their mandatory 2 year contracts don't look bad for consumers. Even if the FCC blocks ATT from buying out T-Mobile we'll see some other group that isn't currently a large player in mobile phone networks buy them out and re-institute 2 year contracts.

    The carriers simply won't stand for this, even with T-Mobile being the smallest of the big carriers.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Don't get used to it by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Naw, Sprint will probably do it too, then AT&T and Verizon will offer token no-contract plans that are such a bad deal, nobody will care. Sprint, in particular, has nothing to lose. Their phones are (or might as well be) locked to Sprint, and they're able to forcibly be the wholesaler & middleman of every phone used on that network. Even IF you got it to work on Verizon, it would never do EVDO -- only 1xRTT. And if you got it to do EVDO on MetroPCS, it still wouldn't be able to do LTE (all American LTE is non-interoperable).

  46. Re:Tethering by yurtinus · · Score: 1

    I believe they've laid it out that the first 500MB (or 2.5GB if you went that route) is 4g speed (or whatever is the fastest available to you), after which you're dropped back to EDGE speed. I'm surprised they placed a 500MB cap on the "Unlimited" data plan for tethering, rather than the 2.5GB available at the next lower tier. Supposedly they offer more tethering services, but I'm having trouble finding details on their website.

    --
    +1 Disagree
  47. Re:It still sucks. by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 2

    Do a search on their website for prepaid.

  48. Re:US cellular is a rip-off by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Why is this?

    Demand. Americans don't country-hop very much compared to Europeans.

    Also, things have improved quite a bit. I'm currently on a T-Mobile prepay plan that gives me their sort-of-unlimited-but-they-throttle-the-speed-after-5GB data, unlimited texts, and a paltry 100 voice minutes for $30. My wife has their 1200 minutes or texts plan (but almost no data) for the same amount of money. Sure, I need to buy about $10-15 worth of additional minutes at 10 cents/minute, but it's still a big improvement over what I was paying for inferior service a few years ago. And if the information on the Orange UK website is representative, even the Europeans would find those plans attractive.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  49. No they don't by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    So now they have switched to having just one plan that costs $50/month. That's $600/year. If they think I'm going to pay them this much they are insane. Sure, there are all these phone junkies who are on the phone all the time and are able to use a web browser on a 3" screen, but for quite a few normal people a cell phone is kept mostly for emergencies. For now I apparently can still keep using my $10/year pay-as-you go plan, but if they make me switch, I'm leaving. Where? I have no idea.

    1. Re:No they don't by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      There is another perspective to this. It's a "no hassle, easy to budget price". I have a quite special plan, where everything works with options, but the base fee is 0€/month. Yet, for my wife I opted for the 45€/month plan (with included an iPhone 4S, for 49€ upfront). Why did I do this, as she is neither a telephone junkie or a big surfer?

      Simple: She now has no worries, if she fancies a youtube on the road or buys music on iTunes, she can do it on the bus or on the train. That without me fearing horrendous data fees (With my plan, if I'm not careful, is exactly what would happen to my cellphone). She doesn't need to knoow what a wireless network is, she just always has Internet. It reduces (technical) complexity for her. Same thing for calling: she can call whoever, whenever, wherever she pleases. She doesn't do often, but I will never have to say "Girl, you overdid it a bit on the phone", which will cause an argument for something that is totally avoidable.

      This is also why she has an overpowered quad core i7 27" iMac with 16GB RAM. It cost a shitload, but I know she can now handle her own computing and is unlikely ever going to reach the limits of the machine. Less worries for me.

      You can call me "dumb", but believe me, this is well thought out.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  50. Keeping an eye on this by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    I'm keeping an eye on this, and if it's for real, I may just have a new phone carrier!

    I'm not particularly UNHAPPY with my cell carrier, but I really may just need to vote with my wallet.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  51. Well two things there by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    1) You don't pay extra for voice mail and SMS on most networks. Maybe on some of the pre-pay small networks (who buy time for the bigger ones) but the plans these days seem to be all inclusive with those. Verizion, the company I'm with, only seems to have unlimited calls (to any number in the US at any time), and unlimited SMS. Also includes voicemail, 3-way calling, tethering, etc, etc. This is pretty standard near as I know.

    2) Ireland is, as you say, a small country. It is just barely larger than West Virginia, which is the 41st state in size. The continental US is larger than the entirety of Europe. The plans we are talking about here offer calling, and roaming, around that entire area. What would it cost you to get a plan with unlimited calling (inbound and outbound, to all number) and roaming to Sweden, Spain, Germany, Italy, and so on?

    I certainly won't say the US carriers are perfect, or even that good, but I think some of the people in the EU have a bit of a skewed view of just how large the US is and what area they are covering.

  52. Re:Subsidization by jxander · · Score: 1

    Can decide if this person should get down-voted for being an idiot, or up-voted to ensure the idiocy is on display and thoroughly mocked.

    --
    This signature is false.
  53. Re:no more $30 plan by soundguy · · Score: 1

    Here's a thought. Maybe they don't want your business. If price is your main concern, you're either poor or cheap and neither of those is good for the T-Mobile bottom line. If their entire customer base is paying a minimum of $50 a month, the chances are good that a large percentage of them still aren't going to be using much more resources than you do with your $30 plan, so they increase profits while divesting themselves of cheapskate customers with no upsell potential.

    --
    Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
  54. An even lower-cost option with T-Mobile by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 2

    The base plan T-Mobile is touting is $50 per month for unlimited everything (500 MB data at 4G speed).

    Wal-Mart sells a T-Mobile plan for $30 per month for unlimited text and data (5 GB data at 4G speed). The catch is that the plan has only 100 minutes of voice. But if you are willing to use Google Voice with Groove IP, you can use your data to talk. I have this setup and love it! Better still, if you're in WiFi range, you can stretch your WiFi even farther.

  55. 2 questions by sootman · · Score: 1

    1) When my 2 years is up with AT&T this fall, can I take my AT&T iPhone 4S over to T-Mobile and use it there, since they both use SIMs?

    2) How is T-Mobile's coverage in Orlando & the SF Bay Area? (Specifically, the Peninsula?)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:2 questions by balbus000 · · Score: 1

      I'm on T-mobile and was looking this up for my fiancé who is on AT&T.

      1) The iPhone will work on T-Mobile once it has been unlocked. You have to contact AT&T to unlock the phone, but it seems like it will be pretty simple, as long as "all contractual obligations ... have been fully satisfied." See here.

      2) Coverage in Orlando was fine for me. I didn't run any speed tests there, but I live in Gainesville, FL and have seen up to 19 Mbps download. It averages around 12 Mbps down, and 1.5 Mbps for upload. I'm not sure about the SF Bay area.

      One thing I want to know is how easy it would be to end the contract early, and pay the early termination fee (it shouldn't be much, as her contract ends this summer). Would they unlock the phone after that without any hassle?

    2. Re:2 questions by sootman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I would guess that paying an early term fee would count as "fully satisfying contractual obligations." Or maybe T-Mo can unlock it for you. Now that I've had time to look at it, their site says "If you need to unlock your phone, contact your carrier or visit a smartphone unlocking website" and a link to www.releasemycode.com . Fine print says "Check your warranty and contract with your carrier to see what conditions apply to unlocking your device. T-Mobile is not affiliated with and does not endorse releasemycode.com. Use at your own risk."

      Probably, it depends on who you talk to. If you walk into an AT&T store, you might get a cool guy who will unlock it for you with no hassle, or you might get a guy who won't unlock it no matter what documentation you shove in his face. And an early term fee will be at least $95 from AT&T, and that's if you only have one month left: "$325 minus $10 for each full month of completed Service Commitment" -- so 23 months in you'd still owe ($325 - $230) = $95.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  56. Re:It still sucks. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    *protip:

    Just buy the walmart POS, yank the SIM, and put it in your real phone. Enjoy the different price.

  57. Biggest benefit: simplicity by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    It sounds like T-mobile has the best purchasing experience. People shouldn't have to create a spreadsheet with a pivot table to find the best plan. Simple = good.

    The problem with many carriers isn't the subsidy scam, but the confusion. The phone shows one price - but that is with plan X. But with plan Y it is a different price. Another phone shows the price including a mail-in rebate, but this one here has an instant rebate. They don't know how much the taxes are. This plan would be $A/month but you pay some amount for text messages, but this plan has unlimited text messages but is it worth it? What if I add my son to the plan?

  58. T-Mobile calls their call extenders wifi calling. by ebiederm · · Score: 1

    There is no extra fee to use wifi calling on T-mobile.

    So if you have a wifi network in your house you have already setup a call extender that can be used with T-mobile. It can be particularly nice if you travel outside of the US and want to call home. You get local US domestic rates.

  59. Re:no more $30 plan by Dahan · · Score: 1

    You mean 4G speeds. It's still right there on their prepaid plan page. "$30 per month — Unlimited web and text with 100 minutes talk: 100 minutes talk | Unlimited text | First 5GB at up to 4G speeds"

  60. Re:Errors Errors Everywhere by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    The 500GB was a typo, but the 2.5GB is in fact correct.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  61. Re:US cellular is a rip-off by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    Thoe plugs look like the behemoth German SchuKo plugs. But the beer looks a bit crap.

    Have they yet received their Darwin Award?

    Or maybe this is a Fraunhofer office party celebrating a new form of electricity that doesn't short in water? Or maybe they are bathing in distilled water(which could also be worthy of a Darwin Award)? Or very thin insulating full body suits?

    There is only one level of stupidity in this picture but several other levels of potential genious!

    The beer still looks crap.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  62. What about Canada? by already_read · · Score: 1

    I'm holding my breath!

  63. Re:T-Mobile calls their call extenders wifi callin by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    I don't think they support WiFi calling on phones they don't sell. It doesn't always work on modded phones either.

    While I love T-Mobile I'm not sure I'd ever buy another phone from them. Their phones tend to be expensive (well, all the other major carriers are too). You can save quite a bit by buying from Google, or from some Asian supplier.

  64. Not exactly by gelfling · · Score: 1

    You're still on the hook to pay off the phone if you leave or it breaks or you lose it.

  65. Re:Tethering by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    Yup, the nice thing about T-Mobile is that you can't get hit with per-MB charges, ever. The worst that can happen is you get throttled. That means you don't have to buy an extra-large plan "just in case" or check your data every other day.

    Only Sprint offers a similar deal. Verizon and ATT just love the add-on charges. Back when I had Verizon I found myself having to over-spend on my plan just to avoid getting the surprise $600 phone bill. That is especially a big concern if you have kids. Sure, you can yell at them and it doesn't happen often, but it is cheaper to pay the extra $20/mo as "insurance." I resented this and am saving money and don't have to worry about the insurance at all...

  66. Re:Subsidization by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    They do, and the down payment, monthly service charge and early termination works out to be about the same as the big carriers.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  67. Re:But does it have the same limitations as pre-pa by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    * no visual voicemail

    You do get vvm on prepaid as an actual T-Mobile customer. You don't get transcription IIRC. You can't use MyAccount. You can use top-up.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  68. Tmobile, worst customer service EVER by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

    I will never, EVER use Tmobile. EVER. (yes, disgruntled). I had to cancel early due to moving and having absolutely NO coverage in my new location. Suddently, the early termination fee more than doubled for each of our phones. When I asked to speak to a supervisor, was told the guy I'm talking to was one. When I asked to speak to his boss, was told he's not available, but his name was "Fred" I asked for the last name, was specifically told that "Fred" has no last name. I HATE Tmobile with a passion, and repeatedly hope they go out of business in shame.

  69. Re:US cellular is a rip-off by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    It's because our corporations pay many millions of dollars directly to the members of our government's legislative branch.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  70. Re:Not the first by Hrshgn · · Score: 1

    For some background information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Mobile

    It was funny to see all the historical mobile operators in France scramble to get similar offers out just based on rumors about what exactly Free will be doing.

    Unfortunately, many people still don't understand the value of non-subsidized plans and prefer 1- or 2 year contracts because they get a free phone. Sigh :-(

  71. Welcome to the 00's... by cbope · · Score: 1

    Wow, sounds almost exactly like what we have had in Finland for years now!

  72. TMo Should Buy Wind in Canada by IllogicalStudent · · Score: 1

    Seeing as how Wind Mobile is being sold, T-Mo should get into the Canadian market. It's logical, as Wind's towers use the same AWS spectrum as TMo (and largely, the same phone models). We need someone other than Robellus to buy Wind, to keep the market sane(ish).

    --
    But Maaa! Everyone else has a .sig !
  73. New Plan by Big+Jim+Taters · · Score: 1

    I just put my wife on one of their new plans. We went in there very confused about why we'd want to pay essentially full retail price for a GS3 when I could get one from somewhere else for a lot less (paid in $20 increments over several months). They explained that the new plan takes the cost of the phone out of the plan itself (like the article said) and included all the data, voice, text, AND FULL INSURANCE with it. Essentially saying you buy the phone from us outright and we'll make sure you get to keep it while you pay it all off. I thought it was truly brilliant for once.

  74. Land lines by tepples · · Score: 1

    unlimited calling to any US mobile number, which is the bulk of most calls people tend to make

    Do you mean "US" is the bulk, or "mobile" is the bulk? You'd be surprised at how many households among my extended-family survey sample still have land lines. A lot of Slashdot users seem to think it's zero, but I wouldn't be so quick to assume that, especially if there are kids in the house who are legally too young to have a job to pay for their own cell phone, and especially now that a VOIP land line from magicJack is $3/mo or less if you already have high-speed Internet.

  75. Am I the only one seeing a problem with this? by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Customer signs up for service and selects an iPhone 5 or other expensive phone, so Tmo "finances" it for them. Customer then cancels their service and stops paying for the phone. How do they get the balance of what the customer owes them for the phone? It sounds like they're just getting creative about what they call their contracts and subsidies. If you can still get an iPhone without paying the full $650 up front, I'd say that's still a contract you're signing, just perhaps a contract shorter than 24 months.

  76. I would assume.... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    ...they collect it the same way AT&T collects if you cancel your contract prematurely. They turn you over to a collection agency and screw your credit rating if you don't pay. I think the point is that once you pay off your phone, you're done, and your bill for service is(in theory) less than the phone-subsidizing competition. With AT&T, I'm paying for my subsidized phone forever.

    I expect the manufacturers will hate this, as consumers will no longer be upgrading to "free" (subsidized) phones every two years. Not that that's a bad thing. When I got my iPhone, I crunched the numbers and a two year contract with AT&T worked out to be the best deal. But once that contract's up, I'll be looking hard at switching to a non-subsidizing service, assuming my phone is still working.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  77. Re:But does it have the same limitations as pre-pa by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    It used to be that Visual Voicemail simply didn't work (you'd install their app, and it would say something like "can't connect") - and on their website, they explicitly had prepaid plans listed as not supporting this feature. This has changed sometime recently, though.

    But you still can't set up Google Voice.

  78. Meanwhile, T-Mobile breaks voicemail forwarding by pkbarbiedoll · · Score: 1

    The no-contract plans do not allow voicemail forwarding - so if you currently use YouMail or an equivalent, you will be SOL by using T-Mobile.

  79. Re:500MB. I go through that in a few days.... by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    I have already lived long enough to see lawsuits where unauthorized access to as little as a song invoked thousands of dollars in legal fees, while tax havens specifically crafted to avoid tax collections, operating in the Caribbean and Indonesian islands, continue to operate. This one-sided law is wearing heavily on my respect for law - its seeming more and more like organized muggery every day.

    ...

    OH! Muggery...that's an m there...read something quite different at first.

    Although come to think of it, in the context perhaps my initial mis-reading was more accurate...if not quite appropriate :o)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  80. The mobile telecom war begins by feldmark · · Score: 1

    This looks to me like a preview of good things to come after Masayoshi Son and Softbank acquire a controlling stake in Sprint, which will also buy out Clearwire. T-Mobile better grab some market share before Softbank arrives. (Son was the upstart in Japan in the early 2000's who make things there very competitive.)

  81. Re:Tethering by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

    That's why my kids have Tracfone. Use up you minutes and you no talkee, no textee. Then they wait until next payment cycle to have a phone. It teaches management skills.

  82. Re:Good for both sides if done right by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

    Best Buy tried similar shit. I was going for instant gratification when my ancient iPhone wouldn't hold a charge any longer, but when they said it was $450 for a no-contract unlocked phone, I started laughing. I thought she was joking. I said, you do know that they are $300 directly from Google, don't you? Then I remembered why I don't ever go to Best Buy.

    I went home and ordered Monday from Google Play. I had it on Thursday. $150 is kinda pricey for that kind of instant gratification.

  83. Re:Tethering by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    The only problem with this approach is that it is usually more expensive (no linkage to family plan, etc). Agree that it is a good teaching approach, though - maybe that makes it worth it in the end.

    However, I think there is still a need for a legislative solution. We don't need to regulate plan offerings or anything like that. Instead, just let customers put a limit on their bill, which can be as low as whatever number was advertised on the window (which will need to include all taxes/fees). If the provider delivers any service in excess of that amount, the service is free (this isn't a payment plan - they can't charge for the service ever). Providers can of course cut off service or not deliver optional services that aren't going to be paid for until the next billing cycle.

    The basis for providing a service should be a conscious agreement between buyer and seller. Anything else is little more than a scam. If the buyer doesn't realize they're buying something, then the sale is null and void.

  84. Re:Tethering by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

    Yes and no. Three years ago I would have agreed with you entirely, but the landscape has changed drastically. Prepaid is no longer necessarily more expensive and in fact oftentimes much cheaper. I switched from AT&T to Straight Talk last year and have way more service, the same coverage and the same network for the equal cost.

    I paid off my contract in 2010 and for a year and a half I watched as my options open up. After paying off my phone subsidy, AT&T never reduced my bill. In fact, they instead raised the price of my text messages since I had no bundle option. Despite AT&T's incessant marketing, I refused to sign on for another "free" phone in return for two more years of indentured servitude. I bought my own phone and left AT&T and I will never again agree to another postpaid contract. I am now free to change providers any time I find a better deal or service plan that is better tailored to my usage patterns.

    Are my kids' Tracfone's expensive? It depends on your criteria. I spend about $10 per month on average for each of their phones. Good luck finding any postpaid plan that costs so little; even as an add on. The price per minute is expensive, but the total cost is low. The added benefit is that it does teach responsibility, delayed self gratification, and prioritization. As they near high school, I may look into family prepaid plans.

    As for a legislative approach. I believe that the market has finally responded to that need. The whole point of a postpaid account is that you can receive services you don't anticipate throughout the month. What you are advocating is essentially a prepaid account, paid in arrears. I do agree in principle, however, that you should be able to place restrictions on maximum liability for your account.

  85. Re:Tethering by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    My post-paid plan had zero cost for the kids lines, actually, but it isn't a plan currently offered. That gets 500min/mo on each of the lines.

    I do agree with you though. Plans are always changing, as are phones. When people tell me what phone they should get in six months I tell them to ask me again in six months. The same is true of plans. Last summer when I re-signed with T-Mo the value plans were the best option for my circumstances, but that could easily be different next time.

    Still, $120/mo for unlimited voice and text on four lines, 2GB 3G data on two lines, 500MB 3G data on two lines, and unlimited 2G data on all lines is a VERY good deal. That would be hard to beat pre-paid assuming you needed all that data.

  86. Re:Tethering by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you have the same plan with T-Mobile that a friend of mine has. For 4 lines, it is hard to beat. I spend about $70 for three phones, but the Tracfones are limited. My problem is that I have to use AT&T networks due to circumstances. T-Mobile's Wi-Fi calling is sporadic at my place of employment so that reduces my options to AT&T and MVNOs.

    T-Mobile was my second choice and I may go that route when the kids are older and drop my landline. They are the most competitive of all the carriers.