Slashdot Mirror


Main US Weather Satellite Fails As Hurricane Season Looms

First time accepted submitter Rebecka writes with bad news, quoting an IB Times report: "Just as the 2013 hurricane season is about to begin, one of the U.S.' main weather satellites failed this week. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite, also known as GOES-13, reportedly ceased to operate as of Tuesday, making it impossible to predict weather patterns on the East Coast." A note at NOAA's page for the GOES family of satellites says "GOES-13 imaging and sounding operations suspended. Recovery efforts for GOES-13 continue and the spacecraft health and safety are nominal. GOES-14 is being activated." You can follow the progress on the agency's page of General Satellite Messages.

235 comments

  1. They saw this coming for ages... by benjfowler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unfortunately, because of Republican intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird.

    Everyone will now be screaming blue murder because of the huge negative economic impact this is going to have. Reliable weather prediction is critical for many businesses, including the ones responsible for the food supply.

    I hope the wingnuts are happy.

    1. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by jaymz666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      we don't need it, god will look after us

    2. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be lost, MSNBC is that way.

    3. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Sparticus789 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And how many satellites could have been built with the $535 MILLION that the Obama Administration gave to Solyndra?

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    4. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I actually work on one of the teams that is building the GOES-R satellite. Say what you will about funding and scheduling, but we have not been cancelled.

    5. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, they are protecting the country, didn't you know?

      At least that's what they keep saying while they protect the rich...

    6. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by h4rr4r · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    7. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by jaymz666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you doing here? get back to work

    8. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately, because of Republican intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird.

      Yeah, no. This is the Washington Monument gambit.

      "We need you to cut the fat, what can you cut to save money?"
      "OK, we choose to cut weather forecasting for the northeast, rather than our useless website or that $200 million supercomputer to beat out the EU (despite the EU supercomputer being less than half as powerful as our current system while still being more accurate)."

      It's just a ploy for more money. They could take money from other useless parts (like the website that the private sector has entirely covered, or the supercomputer upgrade that won't actually help), but instead, they're going to stop predicting hurricanes in an effort to get more money to waste.

      Nothing to do with Republicans, everything to do with government waste and greed.

    9. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Sparticus789 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From your own source:

      "In 2009, the Obama administration approved a $535 million loan guarantee that helped the company build a new factory in Fremont, Calif."

      Your attempt at spin away from blame is sad. Especially when the above statement is in the 4th paragraph.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    10. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Magic 8 Ball to the rescue: Outlook not so good.

    11. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or the trillion-plus dollars they've spent on a war in Iraq for which absolutely none of the stated reasons turned out to be true.

    12. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No spin, just that was not all the money they got.

      Personally both of those presidents have not been the greatest.

    13. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by acoustix · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately, because of Republican intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird..

      Bullshit. The Dems had a supermajority of Congress in 2009 and 2010 and also held the office of the President. Why didn't they act then? Oh, I guess that doesn't fit your narrow-minded "republicans are evil and stupid" mindset.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    14. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost one.

    15. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, Lotus Notes is worse.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    16. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Fuzzums · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Aww. $500 million. Just imagine how many satellites could have been built from a fraction of the military budget.
      That is measured in billions. Just saying.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    17. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, Outlook and Outlook Express are not so good.

      Try Thunderbird.

    18. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to do with Republicans, everything to do with government waste and greed.

      That has as much to do with Republicans as Democrats. We spend as much on our military as the rest of the world combined. That's ridiculous.

    19. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Kasamir · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're working on Gozer? Does that make you the Keymaster or the Gatekeeper?

    20. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the supermajority they held for that long stretch between September 24 2009 and February 4 2010.

    21. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by dietdew7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you're gonna have to come in on Saturday.

    22. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by t4ng* · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Democrats only kind of had a super majority for about 4 months starting at the end of 2009. But only if you count 2 independents and the blue dog Democrats as voting with them, which they don't. So instead, you had the Republicans using the filibuster more than any Congress in history. Oh, but wait, the only way they've been able to filibuster so often is because they just expressed their intent to filibuster without actually doing the time consuming work of a filibuster. That way they can quickly get on with the business of expressing intent to filibuster even more.

    23. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From your own source:

      "In 2009, the Obama administration approved a $535 million loan guarantee that helped the company build a new factory in Fremont, Calif."

      Your attempt at spin away from blame is sad. Especially when the above statement is in the 4th paragraph.

      And yet $535 million is still a lot less than a single B-2 bomber.

    24. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      I think that was his point. In the US Dems and Repubs are just two sides of the same coin. Doesn't matter which side it lands on, the US people are going to get screwed.

    25. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not narrow-minded if it's true.

    26. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      cc:Mail FTW

    27. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, both presidents are(were) awful. Both have eroded Liberties in such a way that short of tossing out both (D) and (R) congress critters and replacing them with (L) and (G) people, they (Liberties) won't come back any time soon. It seems like the American People love their nanny state, and being protected by the evil boogie men.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    28. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by JWW · · Score: 1

      GOES-R's mission logo really need the StayPuft Marshmallow Man in it....

    29. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Personally both of those presidents have not been the greatest.

      They are almost indistinguishable, based on most policy of any real import. Obama followed the Bush Iraq timeline, implemented a "surge" in Afghanistan, massively expanded Medicare, extended the Bush tax cuts for 4 years (and most are still in place), kept 'Gitmo open, continued the Bush bailout policies, extended the Patriot Act, invaded a country in the Middle East, uses drones to conduct targeted killing, and has presided over a massive increase in debt. That's just off the top of my head, so my apologies if I've missed anything. I'm sure I'm subject to some confirmation bias, but yes I am aware that our military is slightly more gay. However, I'm also aware that the Democratic party had a majority for two full years and they did not repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, or any of the other things that they later blamed on Republican obstructionism.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    30. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Yes no spin. Just 100% lies.

      The statement was " the $535 MILLION that the Obama Administration gave to Solyndra". Are you claiming there was another loan/loan guarantee/grant under Bush that happened to also be exactly $535 million? Are you then seriously further claiming that you thought the poster was referring to that earlier item and assigning it to the wrong President? That's going to be a stretch given your own source says "the Bush administration program didn't finalize a single loan guarantee [under the program in question]".

      So please, provide your citation for the $535 million Bush gave to Solyndra?

    31. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      I am claiming that the previous president gave them some money as well and I erroneously assumed that 535 million included all the money they got out of these loan programs. Which president finalized it seems awfully picky though.

      I am sure you have made a mistake before, so lighten up francis.

    32. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, because of Republican intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird.

      Didn't read even TFS, I see.

      They've already activated the back-up satellite (GOES-14), which has been in orbit waiting for this for four years now (launched in 2009).

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    33. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by TwineLogic · · Score: 5, Informative

      GOES-R looks really cool.

      Here is a trailer/teaser video about it, excellent production values. It could be titled: "GOES-R : Into Fog"

      The page that has links to all these videos is at a special U.S. government website about GOES-R

      This is a much longer video which details all of the instruments.

      Finally, you may enjoy this video on the overall NOAA project and system, and how GOES-R fits into that system. Of note in this video is the statement that currently three (3) GOES satellites provide redundant coverage of the U.S.

      At the moment, GOES-15 is the west coast satellite, at longitude 135 West. GOES-13 was imaging from 75W. GOES-14 is presently located at 105W.

    34. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Rockoon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I am claiming that the previous president gave them some money as well and I erroneously assumed that 535 million included all the money they got out of these loan programs.

      Got a citation?

      It looks more like that you have an honesty problem, which you have compounded several times now on this issue as one statement of yours after another gets cracked wide open as a complete lie by the citation you did give.

      Its easier to simply stop being a dishonest fuck.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    35. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good lord! Now we're politicizing weather...

      If the first thing you think of when you see 'Main US Weather Satellite Fails As Hurricane Season Looms' is 'darn those stupid Republicans', you might need to detox a bit from HuffPo and MSNBC. Otherwise, it won't be long before you start blaming seg faults on Bush's incompetence.

    36. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Rockoon · · Score: 0

      So instead, you had the Republicans using the filibuster more than any Congress in history.

      More times than ever in history, so every other time in history had a negative sum of filibuster occurrences? (hint: zero filibusters during the period you claim)

      I know that the Democrats equate threats of a filibuster with actual filibusters, but they seem to only do so when its convenient, and absolutely refuse to compare the records on equal terms. The number of Democrat filibusters only includes actual filibusters, while the number of Republican filibusters includes any time someone says the word 'filibuster.'

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    37. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, we've seen hints of this for a bit, so it's not a tremendous shock, but it is quite possible that some of the farther-reaching instruments might get cancelled in order to have an early launch.

    38. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private websites don't release all that information for free, do they?

    39. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Sparticus789 · · Score: 2

      Citation please?

      Actual numbers are more like 44% of the spending by world governments on the military is spent by the United States.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    40. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      As I recall, supermajority be damned, they couldn't break a filibuster. And they didn't have a Senate supermajority, either, they were one short at 59. Are you creating some sort of meta-congressional supermajority of all members of both Houses to make your case look good? Cause if so, it's irrelevant to making the case that Democrats had a total lock on power in the 111th Congressional session, becaues they certainly didn't.

    41. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Nothing to do with Republicans, everything to do with government waste and greed.

      That has as much to do with Republicans as Democrats. We spend as much on our military as the rest of the world combined. That's ridiculous.

      Promote 'em to Astronauts. Then everything will be fine.

    42. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by corando · · Score: 2

      I actually really like their website, especially the hourly weather graph and radar images. I find it handier (and more ad free) than many private sites.

    43. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      The only caveat is that Sen. Majority Leader Reid has had multiple opportunities to reform/repeal the filibuster and hasn't. Nor has he called the GOP's bluff and made them actually filibuster.

      If you let the bully continue to bully you, you are not innocent in the results.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    44. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the B-2 Wiki page: ".... Development originally started under the "Advanced Technology Bomber" (ATB) project during the Carter administration, and its performance was one of the reasons for his cancellation of the B-1 Lancer..." Yea Jimmy!

    45. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > It's just a ploy for more money. They could take money from other useless parts

      Your logic is the same as any conspiracy theorist - it can't be disproved. You'll always be able to pull up some government program that you personally don't think is worthwhile as "proof" that teh government is just holding people hostage for funding.

      While I am sure that within the tens of thousands of different budgets internal to the us federal government there is funny business going on, it is specious to claim that is what is going on every time something serious breaks. The government is just not that well organized.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    46. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And how many satellites could have been built with the $535 MILLION that the Obama Administration gave to Solyndra?

      I'm not sure, but you could have built at least 7000x as many satellites for the cost of the Iraq War. Bonus points for a lot fewer Americans killed.

    47. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, it was "impossible to predict weather patterns on the US East Coast" for like 15 minutes until they took the backup satellite off standby.

      Whew, that was close! Those hurricanes come out of nowhere!

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    48. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They could take money from other useless parts (like the website that the private sector has entirely covered

      Uh, where do you think "the private sector" is getting their data from?

    49. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      OK, we choose to cut weather forecasting for the northeast, rather than our useless website or that $200 million supercomputer to beat out the EU

      That's $25M, not $200M, and I suspect the website is even cheaper.

    50. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Xeth · · Score: 2

      It's neither; it's factually inaccurate. GOES-R is alive and well, and likely to deliver on schedule (launch and operations in the 2015-2017 timeframe). The reason the article listed the expectated lifetime of the satellite was 2015 is that it should be replaced around then.

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    51. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn it, that was Bush's fault too.

    52. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by meglon · · Score: 1

      First, the page you've chose to use adjusts the numbers to the current exchange rate. There is a caveat on the page itself saying: "These results can vary greatly from one year to another based on fluctuations in the exchange rates of each country's currency."

      Second, at 682 billion a year, the numbers are low to very low. The numbers are only the DoD budget, and spending for Afghanistan an Iraq. It ignores all military project spending outside of those, like the 20 billion tucked away in the DoEnergy for nuclear weapons, Another 8-10 billion "slush fund" of misc. spending not in the budget, or the DoD numbers, another 8-10 billion from the State Department, 120+ billion in Veterans Affairs... here's a nice little breakdown of it: http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175361/ (although it's for 2012, the numbers only get a bit bigger as time goes on).

      But here's the big part that so many people seem to miss: the countries on the list. To anyone, other than a hysterical coward, they do not pose a military risk to the US. China would be flat out stupid to engage us militarily, as we're one of the main driving forces behind its economy. Russia, in reality, has become a fairly dependable ally in NATO. Yes, there's some things we do they don't like, and the difference is they stand up to us and tell us instead of roll over. The rest? Allies or partners.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    53. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aww. $500 million. Just imagine how many satellites could have been built from a fraction of the military budget.

      Or, even by cutting off welfare for people that ARE able bodied and can work. Or by cutting the waste from Medicare and SS, which are about the other 2/3 of the main budget chunks along with military.

      You know, if we shrunk the Federal Govt back down to more resemble what it is Constitutionally mandated to do, we could easily afford a lot more stuff.

      Hell, why don't we quit sending so much fucking money out for Foreign Aid, and spend it on satellites? Who objects to that one?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    54. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Didn't read even TFS, I see.

      To be fair, "making it impossible to predict weather patterns on the East Coast", to me at least, made it sound like GOES-14 was not nearly as ready to take over for GOES-13 as you are saying it is.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    55. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by tipo159 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "OK, we choose to cut weather forecasting for the northeast, rather than ... that $200 million supercomputer to beat out the EU (despite the EU supercomputer being less than half as powerful as our current system while still being more accurate)."

      That's odd. Cliff Mass, a well-respected climatologist at University of Washington, expressed concern about deficiencies in the NWS computing resources here and here. He was very positive on the NWS computer upgrades.

      But, I guess that you know more about this than he does, right?

    56. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Biosci777 · · Score: 1

      And if you could use the new cover sheet for the TPS reports, that'd be great....

    57. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Except that we have plenty of other birds giving us imagaes. just not high enough resolution to see if it's raining on the left side of a street.

      Hell there are ancient WEFAX birds still up there that make a pass every 4 hours.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    58. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yet if 1/2 the money spent in the past 13 years killing brown people in the middle east was spent at NASA and NOAA, we would be living on mars.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    59. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      To be fair, "making it impossible to predict weather patterns on the East Coast", to me at least, made it sound like GOES-14 was not nearly as ready to take over for GOES-13 as you are saying it is.

      True enough. There's no doubt that TFS just screams "we're all gonna die, Die, DIE!"

      Which is, alas, all too common these days. Sensationalism FTW....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    60. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Or, even by cutting off welfare for people that ARE able bodied and can work. "

      Ageed, When do we start cutting the pay to Congress?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    61. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're actually going to be quite short of weather sats in the next decade or so. That we had a backup this time is nice, but hardly indicative that everything is going well.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    62. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Lithdren · · Score: 1

      Clearly the only answer to this problem is to declare hurricanes a terrorist organization, let the US Military take over the NOAA fully for national security reasons and launch enough weather satellites into orbit that their combined blockage of the sun counter-acts global warming, which is causing them to get steadily stronger as time goes by.

      This lets the Republicans continue to massivly overspend on the US Military for poinless reasons, and gives the Democrats a win as the War Against Global Warming, while still managing to screw the average american public with overspending and higher taxes as we blast huge amounts of chinese-made weather satelites into orbit.

      Ok you can all calm down now, you're both evil.

    63. Re: They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until that spending is 51% how will we ever be the best?

    64. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Less than half of one.

      Last fiscal year, NOAA's budget got cut hard and to deal with it, they excised most of the satellite budget. Unfortunately, they later realized that they NEEDED to get another satellite up into orbit and had to pull $1B out of the rest of their budget to finish building that satellite.

      I know it's just a troll post, but you could troll better than that...

    65. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by babywhiz · · Score: 1

      "$535 million [ box office sales of Jurassic Park (1993)] "

      This addon will never get old.

    66. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we start cutting our military spending by cutting all military assistance to the UN.

    67. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Saethan · · Score: 1

      He wants to hang on to the option for when he eventually loses majority in the Senate.

    68. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh, where do you think "the private sector" is getting their data from?

      A whole host of sources, some of which include the NWS but, and here's the important bit, not their website.

      You seem to be conflating "reporting on weather" with "predicting weather." No one is saying that he NWS should be abolished. All I said was that, as we as a nation are beyond broke, we should be cutting all unneeded expenses.

      Building new satellites to replace broken ones is clearly a needed expense. Duplicating the private sector's ability to report on weather? Not at all needed.

    69. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      quite possibly.

      We certainly don't have any backups on-orbit if one of the operational GOES sats goes down, having just activated the last of the backups.

      Not even sure we have anything in the planning stages yet, much less under construction and/or scheduled to be launched.

      Which doesn't excuse a "we won't be able to forecast hurricanes because GOES-13 failed!!!" headline....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    70. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if we shrunk the Federal Govt back down to more resemble what it is Constitutionally mandated to do, we could easily afford a lot more stuff.

      We just couldn't achieve any of it thanks to our new "Consititutional" fundamentalism.

      Hell, why don't we quit sending so much fucking money out for Foreign Aid, and spend it on satellites? Who objects to that one?

      I pay taxes and I want that money going to support humans in need of a basic quality of life, world-wide. So consider your wishlist effectively cancelled out.

    71. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      we don't need it, god will look after us

      Don't you mean The Free Market? Anthropocentric religions are SOOOO last-millenium.

    72. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by nedlohs · · Score: 0

      So "that money" becomes "some money", even though the first clearly means "all". But that's not a lie, right?

      And you own source, as I already quoted, says "the Bush administration program didn't finalize a single loan guarantee", so even your modified claim of " the previous president gave them some money" seems to be a lie. Or do you have some reference for your claim that the Bush administration gave them some money under these loan programs?

      And yes I make mistakes, I don't pretend I claimed something different and keep on digging (well I try not to anyway). I usually just say "I was wrong", though I have to admit that sometimes I just shut up and wallow in my embarrassment.

    73. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      First, Russia is not in NATO. They're not even virtually in NATO. They may not be looking to nuke us at the moment or run over Europe with a Red steamroller, but they're not happy friendly towards us. At best, they are True Neutral. And if you think they are harmless in any way, please actually learn something about Russia. If anything, they're only less dangerous because they dropped the world revolution rhetoric and are still rebuilding their economy.

      As for military risk, risk comes into play based on your capabilities compared to theirs and other tasks. The US derives significant benefit to it's interests by being able to keep open areas that could otherwise be closed off by foreign powers though their close vicinity and less complex logistics issues.

      How about we bring the troops home from Korea and Far Eastern military forward deployments? China will be able to increase it's influence to the point where they may be able to take relatively hostile actions and we won't be able to stop them. Being co-dependent on China works both ways. If we aren't there to stop them from the initial action, there is a lot less of a chance that we will intervene after the fact due to fears about the economy. They won't need to be better than we are if we are across an ocean before we can get to where we need to be to deter. They will just need to be good enough to intimidate local powers if we're not there to tripwire.

      Keep in mind, outside of the operational bases in active war zones, forward US military bases aren't there to actually fight wars, they're there to make people think twice about crossing borders before they actually get in the war. Most countries know that the US's isolationist bent will tend to keep us from getting involved unless we're pissed off. The only way we prevent them from using that against us is by being able to project power, and also having forward deployments in areas we need to support.

      We think that defense expenditure is expensive. Well it is, but it sure beats allowing the world to start fighting wars and then having to swoop in and try and fight back. There has been more than one war that would have been stopped firmly in it's tracks by a serious commitment of defense expenditure without actually being in a war. Some people think that the money is better spent elsewhere, I am not entirely sure I agree.

      People keep bringing up that we spend more money than a lot of countries in the world on defense related expenses, but we also spend only a middling fraction of our GNP on the military. We simply have by far the largest GNP in the entire world. If I bought myself a Ferrari on my salary, I'd be a spendthrift. If Bill Gates bought one, he probably wouldn't even notice. You can't simply throw around numbers like a trillion dollars and expect me to be offended. It's a lot of money, yes, but we've got the money and then some. The problem with the budget is that we've been committing to additional programs without increasing the government's ability to pay for them.

      You could argue that the defense budget should take a hit to pay for other stuff, but there are people out there that might argue that the government has no business paying out for programs it wasn't created to manage. The armed forces were something that the government was created to handle, and while waste should be curtailed, you can't argue that just because it gets a lot of money, that now completely separate programs deserve that money as well. It's like giving my kid who mowed the lawn 20 bucks and then my other kids complaining that I am not giving them 20 bucks for the finger painting business that I never asked them to start.

    74. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it looks like about 10, if we launch with a spaceX falcon 9.

      https://spacex.com/falcon9.php (cost: $54M*, Mass to Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO): 4,850 kg)
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOES_13 (Mass: 3,133 kilograms)

      That said, I think that spacex is/was getting government loan guarantees, so, without them, we wouldn't get them this cheap. Also, Elon Musk (owner of both spaceX and Tesla) just paid off his loan guarantee for Tesla under that same program.

    75. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but you could have built at least 7000x as many satellites for the cost of the Iraq War. Bonus points for a lot fewer Americans killed.

      Unless Saddam attacked the US and all of our weather satellites were helpless to stop him.

    76. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm interested in this "welfare" you speak of. Although I guess I wouldn't qualify since I'm not able bodied. Love it when people blame budget problems on the sick and elderly.

    77. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That be the pirate satellite.

    78. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      What addon is this?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    79. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      A whole host of sources, some of which include the NWS but, and here's the important bit, not their website.

      Really? So stuff like this isn't used by anybody. I assume they get their current conditions on a CD...

    80. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So if they did everything but sign the check due to timing that gets them a free ride in your book?

    81. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      because of Republican intransigence

      NOAA is run by celebrity bureaucrats that gift huge satellite deals to influential contractors that then run up costs. It's gotten so bad inside NOAA that they've banned OIG staff (Office of the Inspector General, the people responsible for oversight of NOAA) from attending Program Management meetings because the IG has recently aquired the nasty habit of investigating NOAA's indifference to cost overruns.

      There have been no large budget cuts. Here is the history of NOAA's annual budgets for the past 20 years, transcribed from a series of NOAA budget "blue books" which provides the actual NOAA budget authority enacted by Congress.

      (billions)
      1993 1.70
      1994 1.99
      1995 1.96
      1996 1.93
      1997 1.97
      1998 2.05
      1999 2.27
      2000 2.34
      2001 3.09
      2002 3.36
      2003 3.34
      2004 3.74
      2005 3.92
      2006 3.91
      2007 3.90
      2008 3.90
      2009 4.40
      2010 4.70
      2011 4.60
      2012 4.90
      2013 4.93
      2014 5.55 (requested)

      NOAA has enjoyed generous budgets over a long period of time. They can't afford to launch satellites not because of dah evib repubwikins but because they are failing to govern themselves responsibly.

      The NOAA swamp needs to be drained and dupes like you need to check yourselves; you don't know what you're talking about.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    82. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, because of Republican intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird.

      A leftist screed is modded up at Slashdot? WTH.

      Let's test. "If it was so damned important, they should have cut something else instead to pay for it."

      (High pitched whine starts, rising in volume until skulls threaten to start crackiing). -1 SHUT UP! -1 I Disagree! -1 Threatens my settled worldview11!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    83. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Iraq War Resolution, which Congress approved, included 22 reasons for invading Iraq (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War#Iraq_War_Resolution). Plenty of which were true (* on #2 which I suspect is your greatest contention, but note that it doesn't just cite existence of WMD but programs to develop such, which he clearly had)

      That's a pretty far cry from your [quote]absolutely none of the stated reasons turned out to be true[/quote]

      True: Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.
      True*: Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."
      True: Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."
      True: Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".
      True: Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.
      True: Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.
      True: Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.
      True: Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.
      True: The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.
      True: The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.
      True: The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.
      Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

      The fact that you don't like or agree with any/all of them isn't an excuse for lying about it.

      Hope the shoe tastes good, you should be chewing on it for quite a while.

    84. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't a 15 minute boot up... It's got to be brought online, and then works in a reduced capacity as it is calibrated. It is up and working at the moment though. It was about a 24 hour outage... GOES 15 (CONUS West) was put in full disk mode during this however, for this fact alone makes the statement that it was "impossible to predict weather patterns on the East Coast" hyperbole, never mind the many other reasons it is.

      A similar event happened last fall, where GOES-14 had to be taken out of storage because GOES-13 was sending noisy images. This event seems to be a little different as it's not facing earth at the moment.

      It's funny that these stories are being reported after the issue has been resolved. This was public knowledge yesterday morning.

         

    85. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      And go back to 2008 spending levels -- you know, when people were dying in the streets?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    86. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      I usually go with the "never assume malice when incompetence can explain it", but you're probably right.

      I don't want the Filibuster gone, it's a 'good' thing, but only when it hurts to use, when it stops the Senate completely while it's being used.

      The last 'agreement' they made was just so convoluted it showed just how messed up the Senate is. And Reid could fix much of it if he truly wanted too.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    87. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      You ask whether people who hang at slashdot are closer to a hot black-haired babe or a short ubernerd with Little Professor Syndrome?

      (Insert picture of Amy Poehler at SNL. desk here) Really?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    88. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by houbou · · Score: 1

      Democrats and Republicans.. It's really like having 2 separate piles of shit.. Each with their own distinctive smell and fragrance.

      As Lewis Black would say: The Republicans are a party of bad ideas and the democrats are a party of no ideas.

      When in congress a Republican yells " I have an idea ! ", the Democrat would respond "yea and I can make it shittier!"

      And the only thing worse than a Democrat or a Republican is when they both try and work together! :)

    89. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 0

      more to the point, it would not be impossible to predict weather patterns on the East coast even without the replacement sat. It would be one less tool available but hardly the only one.

    90. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by capedgirardeau · · Score: 1

      The reason the repubs have stalled this is because they are happy to let it be privatized.

      They have seriously tried to shut down NOAA because they wanted to privatize weather data collection in the past.

      --
      Wax on, wax off baby!
    91. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by SLot · · Score: 1

      Reading the messages from http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/messages.html it looks like it took about 14 hours.

    92. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reference for your new claim that they did everything but sign the check? Seems to me Bush tried to get it put through so he could take the credit but the DoE sent it back to be reworked. All that reworking happened during the Obama administration as did the months of due diligence on the it before issuing the guarantee.

      It's got nothing to do with a free ride. Though I don't think the Bush administration gave any money to Solyndra. I could be wrong on that of course, I have asked your for a reference to support your assertion multiple times after all.

      You would expect some such guarantees to result in failures - if they are only funding sure things then the entire program is pointless since the private sector will do that just fine. There's no "free ride" because there's no problem to be avoided in the first place. It's a program working as designed. Of course politicians and partisan morons will go nuts over it no matter which way it turns out - but that's irrelevant.

      It's your multiple statements that appear to be out and out lies I'm taking issue with, not the funding of this particular company. So do you have any references to back up anything you've claimed yet?

    93. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in this "welfare" you speak of. Although I guess I wouldn't qualify since I'm not able bodied. Love it when people blame budget problems on the sick and elderly.

      Seriously, that terminology isn't clear to you?

      The infirmed/disabled, and elderly are not generally thought of when the term "able bodied" is used.

      I'm talking about anyone outside of that category, and is an adult.

      I drive by the projects and can see a number of great examples there....people sitting around outside during work day hours, looking in doors open at times you see flatscreen tvs playing, etc. I see them at the grocery stores, ladies using food stamps to feed a bunch of kids, many of which are from different fathers, because that helps with more welfare coming in.

      Please, it is easy to spot out there...don't be so obtuse.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    94. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Everyone will now be screaming blue murder because of the huge negative economic impact this is going to have. Reliable weather prediction is critical for many businesses, including the ones responsible for the food supply.

      Which leads to the question I why I should be forced to chip in for a weather satellite so that Conagra and Accuweather can make millions. Unless I'm also gonna get some share of the profits that derive from it, let them buy their own damn satellites.

    95. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to support humans in need, give to a charity. The government shouldn't be doing it.

    96. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never knew the US formed it's military in response to the September 11th attacks.

      The media has always been on the spin that they mobilized that vast military at that point, thanks for clearing that up.

    97. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by sopwath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you a wizard?

      How do you know the physical and mental condition of "them" simply by driving by? What type of education do "they" have?

      You mention "them" having different fathers, have you done genetic testing on "them"?

      I have a strong suspicion that you don't actually know any of the information above and are simply stereotyping, falling into the same type of ignorance, bigotry, and hatred that continues to keep "them" from having the same opportunities you've had. I also suspect that you've never had to live on welfare, never had to make the types of choices people in the projects make, never had to go through the failing education system of the inner-city and so you cannot fathom how "they" live, how "they" make the choices they make.

    98. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 2

      Yes because it's easy to determine physically disability while glancing at someone as you drive by. There are days where I am able to cut my own grass (they are rare, but they happen.) There are days when my friend, who has lymphoma, is able to work. Disabled means you aren't consistently able to work enough. Also interesting you can establish paternity visually. And I'm certian there are many women out there willing to go through the difficulties of parenting in exchange for food stamps. You mentioned the word obtuse? Yes I think that's the appropriate descriptor here.

    99. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      If I had not already commented on this thread, you would have all my mod points.

    100. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Never mind all those other people that got killed from the Iraq War.

    101. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But, I guess that you know more about this than he does, right?

      All you need to know are these facts:

      EU computer: 50TFlops
      US computer: 213TFlops

      The EU computer did better at predicting Sandy than the US one did. So clearly, we need to spend millions of dollars to make the US one even faster! Because clearly speed is the problem, and not bad models.

      Unless Cliff there can explain why we need a much faster computer to out-epeen a much slower computer - I really don't care what he thinks, regardless of how many whiny posts he makes about the NWS epeen being too small.

    102. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but only when it hurts to use

      Agreed - it should be punishing. They should need to be on the floor, all day, all night, speaking, refusing to yield the floor. If you want to hold up the machinery of government with a filibuster, you should have to actually expend the energy to do so. None of this "let's just agree that my threat of a filibuster equates to an actual filibuster, and save ourselves the hassle of actually having to perform the filibuster."

    103. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you have it folks, Parent poster wants your grandmother to die of exposure in the streets. Suggesting we should cut government spending in one area to pay for something that's more important in another area, indeed!

      Never fear, we'll soon make this suggestion into a treasonous offense once the IRS has sufficiently suppressed political speech by hounding every group advocating fiscal restraint out of existence!

    104. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Wrong president dummy, George W Bush gave them that money.

      http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/nov/17/david-plouffe/solyndra-loan-george-w-bush-david-plouffe/

      Respect - for stating the facts. I write that not because I might support President Bush, but because my recollection is that you strongly oppose him but still stated the fact. If we can't keep the discussion centered on facts, even if they might be unpalatable to us, what do we have? Too many people here don't do that. Enjoy your weekend.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    105. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by meglon · · Score: 1
      Which all makes sense, if you're a nation of sociopathic warmongering empire builders..... which supposedly we're not. Ike summed it up brilliantly: http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2011/09/30/the-origins-of-that-eisenhower-every-gun-that-is-made-quote.

      You could argue that the defense budget should take a hit to pay for other stuff, but there are people out there that might argue that the government has no business paying out for programs it wasn't created to manage. The armed forces were something that the government was created to handle, and while waste should be curtailed, you can't argue that just because it gets a lot of money, that now completely separate programs deserve that money as well. It's like giving my kid who mowed the lawn 20 bucks and then my other kids complaining that I am not giving them 20 bucks for the finger painting business that I never asked them to start.

      ...and those people arguing that would be the same as you, not understanding the reality of our original founders intent, even when it's spelled out for them.

      Excerpts from Article 1, section 8:

      To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

      To provide and maintain a Navy;

      To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

      To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

      To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

      Yes, that's right... no standing army, let alone marines or air force. Our government wasn't created to manage our military, at least the way our military is at this time. In fact, it explicitly forbids it. Our government was created with the idea of a national militia, that would be called up in case of an insurrection, or an invasion.... basically a national guard, controlled by the states, but who's structure and training regiment is defines on the national level so everyone is well trained.

      Now, those programs you don't think our government was created to manage: the preamble of the Constitution is considered the driving theme behind the work, and it's position is considered often in legal arguments, especially by SCOTUS (well, used to be... it's hard to see that with some of the newer reversals of precedence that the Roberts court has presided over).

      "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

      Now, i could be wrong... but there i don't see mention of "worldwide military empire" in there.

      It comes back to this: we are spending more than the entire rest of the world on our military and national defense. We loose ten times more people each year in driving accidents than we have in the last decade from terrorists and wars combined; yet we've spent ~10-12 trillion on national defense, plus another 2-3 trillion on two wars... and.. how much to improve driving safety? And now, we're loosing key elements of our infrastructure because we have basically a bunch of cowards who don't feel safe unless we spend all that money on the military, even though it's quit possible we'll loose many more lives without this infrastructure.

      We really have our priorities fucked up, and largely because we have ignorant cowards where we need leaders, and just ignorant cowards as citizens.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    106. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job at lying to get your personal agenda noticed, dipshit.

    107. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cavreader · · Score: 1

      And exactly what Liberties have you lost? Last time I checked the Constitution and Bill of Rights have not been amended in any way. And before you mention the all powerful Patriot Act try looking for any US citizen that has been convicted of violating it's strictures. Look hard enough and you will find that the few times the government has tried to use it against someone the court has ended up dismissing the charges because of flaws with the PA. The executive and legislative branches can make all the laws they want but the judicial branch has the final word on whether or not the law violates someones civil rights. Wait, I have thought of one liberty that has been taking away that really bothers me. I am no longer allowed to get on airplane without taking off my shoes and removing any metalic items on my person.

    108. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having liberties not violated requires more than the laws being in place, it requires that the government live by them. Haven't been paying much attention to the news lately, have you? (IRS, Benghazi) Hey Obama, do you know what the penalty for treason is?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    109. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Why not more "Informative"s for this post? Truth hurts, don't it?

      (I would give it if I had it... )

    110. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The statistics on unmarried mothers, both white and non-white, are increasing, appalling, and widely available.

      cayenne8 said he saw people sitting around outside, presumably not even in wheelchairs. If they got themselves outside, they're capable of working. Welfare fraud has become an obvious scandal (more so than ever, it's been a scandal for at least 40 years.)

      You seem to be interested in finding excuses for irresponsibility located in niches of improbability. Legislators are setting up conditions for parasites to live, parasites are using those conditions, and you are excusing them. Therein lies the nexus of evil in this country, and without all 3 parts it could not succeed. Nice to see you doing your share.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    111. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There are a variety of reasons for the relatively large US military expenditures, some good, some bad. One is that the cost of living and the cost of many materials is higher in the US than elsewhere, so it costs more to do the same this here as elsewhere. Another is that the US bears a large part of the cost of defending (Western) civilization. Another is that keeping at the leading edge of military tech is expensive (the alternative is losing lives.) Among the bad reasons are corruption, waste, not minding our own business, and having the wrong goals when fighting a war.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    112. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by sopwath · · Score: 1

      "Welfare fraud has become an obvious scandal"

      Please cite your sources.

      I find pages like this: http://voiceofsandiego.org/2010/11/10/fact-check-the-frequency-of-welfare-fraud/

      Where actual investigation, statistically significant, relevant, and specific, make it clear that welfare fraud is over-reported. I hear anecdotes about welfare fraud, but I have yet to see reputable, statistically significant sources listed.

      I have a strong suspicion that you, like cayenne8 before you, are simply stereotyping, falling into the same type of ignorance, bigotry, and hatred that continues to keep "them" from having the same opportunities you've had.

      I would like to point out that you made no mention of mental health or education in your argument, perhaps you'd like to comment on literally the first result that comes up in a Google search: http://suite101.com/article/suburb-vs-urban-areas-an-educational-comparison-a154719 I know you prefer hand-waving dismissal of facts, but you may want to work harder at passing off your opinion as fact.

    113. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you done genetic testing on "them"

      No, but the fact that their mother has given each of them a different last name is probably not a coincidence. I've seen her check them in at the clinic.

    114. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I have a strong suspicion that you don't actually know any of the information above and are simply stereotyping, falling into the same type of ignorance, bigotry, and hatred that continues to keep "them" from having the same opportunities you've had. I also suspect that you've never had to live on welfare, never had to make the types of choices people in the projects make, never had to go through the failing education system of the inner-city and so you cannot fathom how "they" live, how "they" make the choices they make.

      Err, where do you get bigotry...I never once mentioned race of myself of those I've observed and, YES, have known, met and have a great deal of first hand knowledge of...I'm quite familiar with inner city life, hence I speak from what I know first hand.

      I'm not saying everyone has had opportunities I"ve had, it doesn't matter. If you are an adult, and able to get up and about, and process oxygen, then you are definitely able to get your ass out of the govt provided apt, and work doing something. Our streets are dirty, pick trash up. There are always jobs to be done, might not be the glorious ones, but earn your keep if we the tax payers are gonna pay you money.

      No one should be able to be paid to sit at home all day on the front porch.

      And, I think if they are going to accept tax payer money, then we have a say on what "choices" they do get to make for themselves.

      If they do not like that, then, they do not have to be on the welfare roles, and can pick another means to earn money, and it had better be legal.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    115. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I take it you've not lived near this type of poverty and abuse of social services like I have.

      Do you live in a very mixed area of a well distributed mix of races? Do you or have you lived in areas that minority numbers are actually the prevalent numbers in that community?

      I have and I do....live in my shoes for as long as I have, and you don't have to make assumptions, you know what your talking about when you speak as I do.

      How many different races live on your street you live on? What percentage of each?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    116. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The Constitution does not forbid a standing army, it just forbids funding it for more than two years at a time. That may not have been the Founder's intent, but the language is quite plain.

      Technically (as I understand it) the Marines are a part of the Navy.

      The Air Force is a very rare example of technology that developed into something not properly handled by the Constitution; it should have been dealt with by an amendment. However, within the context of today's military, the Air Force is no worse than the rest.

      We loose [sic] ten times more people each year in driving accidents than we have in the last decade from terrorists and wars combined; yet we've spent ~10-12 trillion on national defense, plus another 2-3 trillion on two wars... and.. how much to improve driving safety?

      There are many things wrong with your castle-in-the-sky comparison. Here are two: national defense is a governmental requirement, safe transportation is not. There's no way to know how many lives have been saved by military or transportation spending, and it's the lives saved, not the lives lost, that are relevant to the cost (I'd argue that military spending has saved 300 million US lives, whereas transportation safety improvements (not all due to gov't) save about 75,000/year.)

      Last year 2.5 million Americans died. By your silly implied standard, we ought to be spending well in excess of 2.5 quadrillion ($2.5e15) each year on preventing all deaths in the United States. Over 8 million dollars per person per year. That money would come from where? Ah, Obamalogic.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    117. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't be forced to pay for weather satellites; that should be the responsibility of Accuweather and other similar companies, as you may have intended to imply. Nonetheless, it's not as if you don't benefit - you do eat, don't you?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    118. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google-Rutan-Aerospace will soon have their space cars out collecting imagery for the vertical dimension of StreetView. You won't mind popup advertising in your satellite imagery, will you? They promise it will be highly ... personalized.

    119. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by WGFCrafty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having liberties not violated requires more than the laws being in place, it requires that the government live by them. Haven't been paying much attention to the news lately, have you? (IRS, Benghazi) Hey Obama, do you know what the penalty for treason is?

      Having liberties not violated requires more than the laws being in place, it requires that the government live by them. Haven't been paying much attention to the news lately, have you? (IRS, Benghazi) Hey Obama, do you know what the penalty for treason is?

      It's funny you throw out benghazi, the current fox witch hunt, and nnot the more alarming development, the AP's two month subpoena.

      Also, I don't think you know what treason is, or you're just dumb enough to think that the government playing with peoples taxes (remember, there is NO evidence of a cover-up..... yet) justifies the execution of our commander in chief.

      You're the kind of cynical asshole that instead of offering constructive ways of fixing things runs around pontificating about how fucked we are. Grow up, even with every scandal going on x5, people would still be clamoring at our front door for entry to our country.

    120. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Don 't worry, they'll mobilize the wingnut radio army to blame Obama.

    121. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or, even by cutting off welfare for people that ARE able bodied and can work.

      yes, it's about damned time those bankers learn to quit spongiong off of others and work for a living.

    122. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how things would shift if the US withdrew from Western European defense commitments. Would European defense spending would increase to make up the difference? I would imagine at least to an extent. As it stands, there is no real point in trying to catch the US military, but if we drastically shrunk it, global spending might might actually increase if China had the potential to become a militarily dominant regional power (with Japan, Korea, and others expanding to counterbalance that expanded power).

    123. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Discopete · · Score: 1

      Exactly Zero. $535 million doesn't even pay for the body of the satellite, not to mention the payload. And while we are on the subject of satellite expenditures, the GOES-R project (the next generation of GOES satellites) is still going on (at a reported cost of around 7.6 Billion).

      Plus, GOES-14 has been activated and notices have gone out for all receivers to re-train their dishes to it's location and GOES-15 is picking up the slack that 14 is missing. The GOES network of satellites was built to be slightly redundant in the case of craft failure.

    124. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

      Obama is the best President America ever had. And is why so fierce a republitardation against him. A Black man. 8 Years of republicanism lead by king republican Bush ended in bank collapse housing collapse job collapse and stock market collapse DOW 6000 something. The record is unimpeachable.

    125. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Why and how would Saddam have attacked the States? Christ he even asked America's permission before he attacked Kuwait when Kuwait was apparently stealing Iraq oil. What a surprise he got, one day shaking hands with Cheney over a weapons shipment so he could gas the Iranians and the next attacked over weapons of mass destruction that the Americans sold him.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    126. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Well, obviously something has gone wrong, as the group of people in charge of monitoring the President and making sure that he is operating within the law is...Congress.

      Given the fact that Congress currently is controlled by Republicans, who vehemently oppose pretty much everything the President suggests [even, "let's start with your proposal"], either:
      a) The President is acting completely within the bounds of the law.
      b) The President is acting in a way that the Republicans want the President to act now
      c) The President is acting in a way that the Republicans want the President to act in the future, if say, a Republican were to become President down the line.

      I'm pretty sure c) is the correct answer.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    127. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Why do I have to come half way down the fucking page to learn this? Why is all the dogshit fear-mongering at the top?

      We should have a separate mod "Pertinent" which promotes you up the comment history so people can stop hand-waving unnecessarily. Maybe only available for comments with links, or something.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    128. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Bigotry isn't just about race, you know. Class, gender, sexual orientation, hair colour... it's about the behaviour, not what the difference is.

      And picking up trash? Are you volunteering to pay them for that?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    129. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      How many different races live on your street you live on? What percentage of each?

      Why would that even matter? Your racism is showing.

    130. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than what Tesla repaid early.

    131. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

      By your logic, the internet and phone calls would not be protected under the 1st Amendment, because the Constitution does not explicitly say that freedom of speech applies to those mediums, which were not even a pipe dream in the 1700s. The concept of an Air Force was just barely making it into crazy theories at the time.

      As far as the Marines go, they fall under the Department of the Navy. Historically, Marines have always been on Navy vessels to provide security. You know how in all the old time movies about Naval warfare, there are those guys shooting muskets at the opposing boat? Those are Marines, and the United States Marine Corps was formed in 1775 to protect American ships during the Revolutionary War, well before the Constitution was signed.

      The Air Force was formed with The National Security Act of 1947. A law, passed by Congress and approved by the President. The Supreme Court also did not move to overturn the law as unconstitutional.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    132. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the NOAA does have Uniformed and commissioned officers, so the argument could be made that they are a pseudo-military organization.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    133. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by odoketa · · Score: 1

      Holy cow - the best? Really? Despite a foreign policy indistinguishable from Bush? I voted for the man, gave money to his campaign,etc. and even I can recognize a mixed record. There have certainly been some successes - I expect Obamacare will become another strong safety net, for example - but 'best ever'? C'mon!

    134. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hazzard a guess that every new President for the next while will utilize drone strikes more than the previous. Drones a relatively new technology you know.

    135. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cavreader · · Score: 1

      What I have seen is people being held to account for their actions. I have seen every detail of the IRS and Benghazi being debated endlessly in full few of the public.

      "requires that the government live by them"

      And when the government does not follow the law they get held to account for there actions one way or another.

    136. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by azav · · Score: 1

      I actually turned down a position on the first Notes team.

      Best. Decision. Evar.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    137. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by azav · · Score: 1

      Anyone who comes in and has to clean up after Bush has their hands full. Clinton left Bush with a lot. Bush left Obama with a lot to clean up.

      Bush and Cheney should really be tried for treason. We KNOW we have infrastructure we need to rebuild. We HAVE KNOWN THIS. It all was ignored so we could go after the man who Bush said "tried to kill his dad".

      Sure Bushy. Great. The US armed forces and the US budget is at your disposal for reasons like that.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    138. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by azav · · Score: 1

      Fly on a plane lately? TSA on the TRAINS. "Homeland" Security"?

      I so want to hit the people in Washington who started calling America "the Homeland", in the head with a Stop Fucking Doing That stick.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    139. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by azav · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bush and Cheney lied us into a war while not protecting US "within the borders" interests. We (Bush) borrowed more money than ALL OTHER PRESIDENTS COMBINED BEFORE HIM to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.

      Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11.

      Our country's infrastructure needs to be maintained and updated, research projects need to be funded, basic "running of the country" has to happen. Instead we borrowed over a trillion dollars to invade a country that has nothing to do with hurting us, while ignoring the requirements of funding our country's maintenance and having a financial buffer to protect from any financial calamities.

      And we had Katrina, the stock market collapse, the real estate collapse, the tech bubble bursting.

      Our National Guard had equipment and personnel diverted to serve OVERSEAS. They exist for exact circumstances like Katrina.

      It's criminal. Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Dick Army, Alberto Gonzales, Rove, Bolten, Libby, John Yoo + a few more should be all be tried for treason. What took place and what Bush was largely responsible for putting in to action was a grand dereliction of duty, massive incompetence and misappropriation of power and authority to the nation and the American people.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    140. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      So, your defense of the current administration boils down to "Bush was worse". That is a terrible defense of the indefensible. You cannot defend bad behavior by pointing to other bad behavior.

      My question is, if your kid was caught kicking the shit out of some other kid, would you accept "but he did it too, but worse" as an excuse?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    141. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Have you not paid any attention?

      During the "man hunt" (one teenaged man) in Boston, they shut the entire city down and put it in full martial law, searching houses without warrants in violation of the 4th Amendment. What Liberties indeed. "we suspend the constitution during this crisis, and appoint Palpatine as supreme leader"

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    142. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to see you get your "facts" from Faux News Corp.
      To be "Fair and Balanced" and honest in journalism is paramount in keeping the citizens properly informed.

    143. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Bagok · · Score: 1

      However, I'm also aware that the Democratic party had a majority for two full years and they did not repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, or any of the other things that they later blamed on Republican obstructionism.

      Dems had a 60 vote filibuster proof Senate majority from 7/7/2009 (when Franken was sworn in) until 8/25/2009 (when Ted Kennedy passed away), call it six weeks. Dems had a majority yes, but not enough to overcome the Republican obstructionism you mentioned.

      --
      I'm not sure about faith moving mountains, but I've seen what it can do to skyscrapers.
    144. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      And yet they managed to pass a quasi-socialized healthcare. I think it is significant that they didn't even try. Remember also that Bill Clinton signed it into law, though now we're talking about a different guy altogether - and in his defense there was the possibility of a constitutional amendment going forward if he didn't sign it. I'm just tired of correcting people who think it was another bad Bush idea.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    145. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      True: Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.

      Partially true. Iraq apparently did get rid of the chemical weapons and stopped its programs, but Saddam continued grandstanding and trying to not admit he'd disarmed for political reasons. Mistake.

      True*: Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."

      The weapons did not exist, and the programs were suspended. Even if available, they did not pose a threat to the US. Did the use of chemical weapons in the Iraq-Iran war really threaten international peace and security?

      True: Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

      True of that, and several other governments. As far as I can tell, Myanmar and North Korea were worse. Neither of which we've talked about attacking.

      True: Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".

      False. Iraq had no such capability, whatever the willingness.

      True: Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.

      As demonstrated by something a decade before, and shooting at US aircraft operating over Iraq. Meanwhile, there's lots of other anti-US governments.

      True: Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

      There were presumably al-Qaeda members in Iraq, as well as other places. However, Saddam didn't want them there and wasn't supporting them. So, while technically true, this a ridiculous basis for war, and can doubtless be applied to many friendly nations. Sophistry at its finest.

      True: Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations. True: Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

      Yup, along with a lot of other governments.

      True: The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.

      True? It isn't even false. It doesn't make a claim.

      True: The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

      Which Iraq was not notable for.

      True: The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.

      By this logic, we should invade Israel, considering how its neighbors and their neighbors think of it.

      Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

      It was US policy, and had been since 1998. It didn't say "by any means possible".

      True: The US based its policy largely on false claims. Saddam didn't have any WMDs, and the CIA had no evidence that he'd have them for some time. Read Colin Powell's It Worked for Me sometime. He's at pains to explain exactly why he did what he said to the UN. I got the audio version, and you can tell more by the tone of his voice. Saddam had nothing to do with the 2001-09-11 attacks. While a loose cannon (and not the only one), he wasn't all that dangerous to the region.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    146. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, because of Republican intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird.

      Everyone will now be screaming blue murder because of the huge negative economic impact this is going to have. Reliable weather prediction is critical for many businesses, including the ones responsible for the food supply.

      I hope the wingnuts are happy.

      ** boring! **

    147. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      And picking up trash? Are you volunteering to pay them for that?

      Why pay more? If they're getting govt. handouts from OUR tax dollars, let's get a little work out of them, eh?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    148. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cavreader · · Score: 1

      So looking for someone who has set off a bomb, stolen a car, killed a security guard, throwing bombs out the car window while shooting at police in pursuit is the incident that you really want to hold up to prove your "liberties" are being violated? There are laws that do allow the police to search your property in certain circumstances depending upon the level of danger to both law enforcement officers and civilians at the time. In Boston the police were looking for a well armed suspect who had already shown no problem with killing. They were not searching private property looking to collect evidence or effect an arrest on the people living on the property the were looking for an armed and dangerous fugitive. If the police had treated the entire situation differently and more people had been killed the public would have crucified the police for not doing anything to prevent it.

      On the Federal level the President does have the power to unilaterally go to war on his own but his decision can be overridden if the reason he presents to Congress is later deemed insufficient.

      There have been times when the government has clearly violated the law for good reasons. Before the US officially entered WW2 Roosevelt violated several laws that Congress had passed to keep the US out of the war. The vast majority of the citizens at time did not want anything to do with the war in Europe. President Roosevelt felt differently and did what he thought was right instead of what was legal. He used the "Lend/Lease" program to go around the wishes of Congress and supply England with the war supplies they needed. The US Congress had also passed a law banning wire tapping while investigating German and Japanese agents in America at the time. 2 hours after the congressional vote Roosevelt sent the defense department a Presidential order authorizing them to ignore the wire tapping law. These 2 blatant examples of the President breaking the law is more than enough to impeach the President. As it turns out these 2 decisions were vital to the US war effort that the President knew was coming. And even though he broke the law and infringed on peoples liberties he is regarded as one of the best Presidents the country has ever had. Several years ago I watched a round table discussion that included presidents Carter, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2. The question put to them was would they have did the same thing Roosevelt did in the same situation. All of them said they would have made the same choice. Even Carter agreed that sometimes the legal thing is not necessarily the right thing.

    149. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by cavreader · · Score: 1

      One more example of doing the right thing instead of the legal thing is the decisions Lincoln made during the civil war. He suspended habeas corpus and imprisoned journalists who were critical of the government during the war. Can you imagine a President doing something like this today? And despite these illegal actions Lincoln is still considered one of the best US Presidents on record.

    150. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know? I think in this day and age, a statement like that requires a citation. You've got no idea whether the gov is held accountable or not. You're just making shit up, so you can say "Yay, America, we're better than all of you".

    151. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just shut the fuck up. You're either a troll, or too stupid to be in this conversation. I'll agree, though, Boston isn't a good example. That wasn't gov overstepping, that was a bunch of pussies hiding in their houses.

    152. Re:They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make the GP point quite well. He is clearly stereotyping, and so are you. You can't take statistics and then use them to 'blame' individuals you know nothing about. Neither of you know anything about the people in the projects you see. Short version: you are full of shit.

  2. check the weather out west by alen · · Score: 1

    in the USA weather moves west to east
    most times rain in denver or elsewhere in the midwest means rain in NYC 2-3 days later

    i also like to which western baseball games were rained out. back when Coors Field was snowed in and the Mets-Rockies games were postponed, NYC got the rain a few days later. same with the other cities west of us

    1. Re:check the weather out west by qvatch · · Score: 2

      Excepting when it comes off the gulf, or from Canada. Or when it becomes suddenly severe. But yes, typically it does come from the west.

    2. Re:check the weather out west by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Really, the hurricanes mentioned in the story move from west to east?

    3. Re:check the weather out west by brian1078 · · Score: 5, Informative

      in the USA weather moves west to east

      Generally, yes. But many tropical systems that affect the eastern US start their formation off the coast of Africa and move East to West.

    4. Re:check the weather out west by earlzdotnet · · Score: 1

      Yep. This. I'm originally from Oklahoma, but living in Ohio. It seems like when all my friends from Oklahoma are complaining about the weather, I'll have that same weather the next day. This proved extremely true this winter, like 90% of the times it rained/snowed there, it'd rain/snow here a day later. It's proving less true though now in Spring though. The thing that really throws me off is here bands of rain seem to not quite move west to east. In Oklahoma though, it moves almost perfect west to east in almost all cases.

      weather is hard.

    5. Re:check the weather out west by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      Well, that's still West.
      Just really, really West.
      Like, go West young man, then swim, then keep going.
      That's how Columbus did it and if it was good enough for the Queen then it should be good enough for you.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    6. Re:check the weather out west by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Technically the northern half of the storm does move from west to east (relatively)... So he was maybe half right? Come on, be an optimist...

    7. Re:check the weather out west by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, they go from the Pacific ocean, all the way down to the Antarctic and back up into the Atlantic. /sarcasm

    8. Re:check the weather out west by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two problems:

      1) East coast folks usually don't acknowledge anything farther west, so when the weather reaches them, only then does it become news.
      2) Most hurricane weather forms in the Atlantic and travels up the east coast (or up the Gulf).

    9. Re:check the weather out west by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Optimism, on slashdot?

    10. Re:check the weather out west by 0racle · · Score: 1

      or from the Atlantic. So it comes from the west, except all the times that it doesn't.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    11. Re:check the weather out west by meglon · · Score: 1

      I'd make the obvious comment about "way to put a spin on it," but.... i just.... can't.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    12. Re:check the weather out west by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      1) East coast folks usually don't acknowledge anything farther west, so when the weather reaches them, only then does it become news.

      Ahh....why don't I have points to share today? Definitely Insightful.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:check the weather out west by similar_name · · Score: 1

      The hurricanes don't but many smaller systems do. 1 year weather time lapse

    14. Re:check the weather out west by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      yes, we know this, however the premise of the story is "as hurricane season begins"

    15. Re:check the weather out west by similar_name · · Score: 1

      I wasn't disagreeing. I just liked how the video looked.

    16. Re:check the weather out west by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Thanks for a very nice reference. It looks like the western mountains stop most weather, but the prevailing winds (jet stream?) take storms starting east of the mountains or swept northward from the Gulf of Mexico, eastward across the rest of the US. Florida and the southern parts of the other Gulf states seem mostly to get their weather off the water.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  3. In hurricane season the weather satellite... by iampiti · · Score: 1

    ...GOES to sleep.

  4. Jokes by Sparticus789 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Meteorologists cannot predict the weather very well WITH the satellite in orbit. So now, all of a sudden, with no satellite, they are going to predict the weather even more poorly?

    Perhaps they should invest in a weather rock instead.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:Jokes by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2

      In the meantime, they'll just give each weatherman a D20 and a roll-sheet and tell them to predict that way.

    2. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they aren't always very accurate, they aren't all that bad either. Usually you can plan your weekend based on the predictions. I am quite happy to have them.

    3. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they aren't always very accurate, they aren't all that bad either. Usually you can plan your weekend based on the predictions. I am quite happy to have them.

      Yeah, if waiting until Friday afternoon is considered planning. Anything more than 3 days out is pure garbage.

    4. Re:Jokes by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      They will need more than just a D20. Give them a bag with a D20, some percentiles, and 3 D6 dice, some roll-sheet and some other tables to which to add the random noise to. Granted it will cost a bit more but would provide much more useful information and probably similar to quality to what we currently have. That gives me an idea for a website called D20weather.com although I probably wouldn't get around to doing anything with it as I have too many projects already so if someone else wants to take a run at it.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global Warming caused it.

    6. Re:Jokes by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      A big satellite image of a rotating storm system in the atlantic at least shows that SOMETHING is gonna happen.

    7. Re:Jokes by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      That's not very fair. They were able to predict 9 of the last 3 storms!

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    8. Re:Jokes by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Were you even alive before weather satellites? I remember what it was like 40 years ago, and the accuracy of prediction is now far superior to what it used to be.

      The prediction of storm tracks in particular has gotten to be really good. For example the Sandy track prediction was excellent despite the complexity of the situation.

    9. Re:Jokes by hutsell · · Score: 1

      Meteorologists cannot predict the weather very well WITH the satellite in orbit. So now, all of a sudden, with no satellite, they are going to predict the weather even more poorly?

      Perhaps they should invest in a weather rock instead.

      What will they do? They might try to do what was done up until about 30 or so years ago before GOES. Presently, it appears to be just a lot more data with about the same time frame when it comes to predictability. (Would Katrina have been any different without its use?)

      Then again, since IANAM[eterologist], the idea may be full of hot air.

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    10. Re:Jokes by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

      This March, these meteorologists predicted 1 foot of snow or more throughout the DC area overnight. When I woke up, there was 3 inches of snow on the ground. If that is considered superior, then the Borg would probably refuse to assimilate you because it would be a step backwards.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    11. Re:Jokes by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Meteorologists cannot predict the weather very well WITH the satellite in orbit. So now, all of a sudden, with no satellite, they are going to predict the weather even more poorly?

      Perhaps they should invest in a weather rock instead.

      Hmmm, well maybe in addition to the satellites for accuracy verification. I mean, they're relatively cheap, and Weather rocks ARE never wrong...

    12. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granny had a bug.

    13. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the hot air coming out of Washington screws up the forecasts.

    14. Re:Jokes by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

      Hang on. Are you asserting that "one foot of snow predicted; three inches of snow in reality" is the worst possible prediction? So if they had predicted two feet of snow or a sunny 90 deg. F those would have both been better predictions? What metric are you using here?

      Note that "superior" does not mean "the best possible", it just means "better". Either you know (but didn't bother to mention) that 40 years ago weather prediction was so significantly more precise that your single anecdote is sufficient to illustrate that fact or you believe (as I have asserted in the first paragraph) that the prediction in your anecdote was literally the worst possible weather prediction imaginable, which would make it very likely that predictions were more accurate 40 years ago. Neither position makes a lot of sense.

      For the sake of my amusement I shall assume that you indeed consider the prediction to be the worst possible because of your irrational hatred of things that are one foot long.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    15. Re:Jokes by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I remember getting 6 inches of "flurries" one Thanksgiving.

      Of course, you neglect the other 364 days of the year when they were spot on.

    16. Re:Jokes by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Sorry you didn't get as much snow as forecast. You can ask for a refund. On the bright side satellites do help predict the landfall of hurricanes, which can save thousands of lives. For examples of how bad things can get when they can't predict landfall, see the 1900 Galveston hurricane and the 1938 New England hurricane (aka the Long Island Express).

    17. Re:Jokes by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      The predictions of the type of weather and the tracks has gotten much better but the predictions of the magnitude haven't. Seems that we've put more effort into figuring out where weather systems are going to go.

    18. Re:Jokes by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Knowing the weather of tomorrow already is a great advantage. Especially if that weather might include a hurricane.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    19. Re:Jokes by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Yes. I remember when TIROS was launched, and in the years following other earth-observing sats. Much more data coming in, better prediction models, the nine yards of it. Back when, the weather presenter on the local (more channels if in or near a large city) was a real meteorologist and worked his or her reports and forecasts using methods developed or improved largely due to needs during World War Two. Most were pretty good, given what they worked with. Going more than two, maybe three days out was not really possible except for using historic patterns at much lower probability.

      Nowadays? It might have been unusual, but about ten years back I visited with friends for two weeks a few states over and packed according to long-range forecast. Biggest anomaly was an afternoon's forecast rain didn't happen.

    20. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might lead to an increase in accuracy. I remember reading an article in the newspaper about 15 or so years ago where the weather people on TV/Radio were complaining that people didn't realise how accurate they were, and it was something like 79% for a same day forecast. And I remember mentioning to a friend that I can do better than that by looking out the window and going 'red sky at night shepherds delight ...'

  5. Another link to IBTIMES?? with their video ad? by qubezz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try the source at http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/05/22/weather-satellite-fails/2351927/

    Satellite logs are at http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/messages.html, it looks like the satellite failed to return imaging two days ago and is now being put into a storage mode.

    1. Re:Another link to IBTIMES?? with their video ad? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      To be fair to the submitter and editor, I use an ad blocker and didn't know ibtimes.com had intrusive ads until your post. On second thought, I guess this is one of the things an editor should be checking, so I'll only excuse the submitter.

    2. Re:Another link to IBTIMES?? with their video ad? by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      This is a "News for nerds" site. What self respecting nerd doesn't use an ad blockers of some sorts?

  6. Tuesday? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    The way it's been this year, you'd think GOES-13 failed a long time ago.

  7. Nothing to worry about by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the weather satellite fails, we can just get our weather from the Internet like everybody else.

  8. Except its not impossible to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    GOES-14 will be on station shortly, GOES-15 is currently in "full disk mode" eg, getting the whole disk of Earth, instead of being zoomed in on the Western US.. Sure, not as much detail as we'd like, but its not like we're totally blind... BUT, now we need to get another bird up... we're running out of redundancy.

  9. god, to I have to tell you people everything?!! by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Just send the shuttle up to fix it.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:god, to I have to tell you people everything?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      All of these are geostationary satellites. The space shuttle wouldn't have been able to reach them.

    2. Re:god, to I have to tell you people everything?!! by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod this as a +1, Insightful.....but if there's a post that needs a "+1 Sad" option, this qualifies.

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

  10. Not impossible, used to bulls-eye womprats by jdigriz · · Score: 0

    Summary says "impossible to" . Article says Next to Impossible to. Let's have the boys in the ISS take a few pics out the window. It's not as convenient and the passes are much less frequent, but hey, it's something. Also GOES 14 is coming on-line. Now if that fails, we really will be limited to ISS observation.

    1. Re:Not impossible, used to bulls-eye womprats by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      Hmm, just reread the article. The earliest instance is 'impossible' the next mention is "next to impossible." Poor editing, and inaccurate to boot.

  11. More Information by PineHall · · Score: 5, Informative

    The satellite blog at University of Wisconsin has more information including some images from GOES 14, now turned on.

  12. Re: check the weaths out west by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 2

    in the USA weather moves west to east

    Except when it doesn't and goes west off Africa and comes in from the southeast and slams across Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Georgia, South/North Carolina, Virgina, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, etc.. Or when it comes in from the North Atlantic from the northeast....

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  13. Hurricanes are a huge exception to that by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Your typical monster hurricane track starts off the west coast of Africa. It moves WEST in the tropics, then heads NORTH along the eastern US, often continuing some westward motion even well north of the tropics. It does eventually head east, but usually not until the damage is done. Think of it as a big C curve that is mostly over the Atlantic and/or Gulf of Mexico. If we're lucky, the left side of the C doesn't intersect land.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  14. A bit dramatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I feel like the article is a bit more doomsday than it should be. "impossible to predict weather patterns"? Hardly. Goes 14 is already active as of today according to the NOAA CLASS database and covers a good portion of the area GOES 13 covered even before they move it to a new spot. Also don't forget the polar orbiters (POES) satellites that will cover the same area several times a day with equally, or more in the case of Suomi NPP, advanced instruments. Plus the European satellites contribute to forecasts. So it's hardly like a hurricane will form without us knowing...

  15. data from military weather satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Why not get weather data from military satellites? With better resolution and guaranteed performance, military satellite data ought to be able to help us through this crisis. Fudge and jitter the data, shake out any tactical value, but don't blind us to the next hurricane.

    1. Re:data from military weather satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the DMSP satellites already feed data into the NOAA forecasts and models. And depite being military birds they only have a resolution on 0.56km, so not nearly high enough to do anything with (there are other weather sats with 350 meter resolution as well). I think what the article really misses is that just because you can't see a satellite image on a weather website, it doesn't mean NOAA doesn't have 10+ other satellites feeding them data (which they do)...

    2. Re:data from military weather satellites by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Can't think of any reason a spy satellite would be designed to have such a wide field of view...or even be in a geostationary orbit. They need to look at human infrastructure, not whole oceans and continents.

  16. Re: check the weaths out west by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Except when it doesn't and goes west off Africa and comes in from the southeast and slams across Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Georgia, South/North Carolina, Virgina, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, etc.. Or when it comes in from the North Atlantic from the northeast....

    Hello? Louisiana.....

    Did we just suddenly fall off the fuckin' hurricane map?!? WhooHoo...I certainly hope so!!! That way, I can get rid of that damned flood insurance, and not have to leave town a couple times each summer...

    :)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  17. Satellite must not have been working for some time by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

    Based on how poor the weather reports along the East Coast have been for the last few months, the satellite must have gone down much earlier.

    Case in point, the weather for New York on 5/20, after looking at several different sources the day before, all said the same thing: low 70s with partly cloudy skies. The result: cloud blocked skies and light rain.

    If you can't get the report right 12 hours before something happens, why should we listen to you for something a few days down the road?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  18. Just remember, by houbou · · Score: 1, Troll

    the most accurate weather report comes from 1) look outside your window and 2) open the door.

    1. Re:Just remember, by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I also call aunt tilly in the upwind state. works 80% of the time

    2. Re:Just remember, by houbou · · Score: 1

      LOL, Didn't realize that light sarcasm is a trollish behavior.

  19. The satelite's been broken for a while! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This same satelite, GOES-13, already failed (according to reports from September 2012)- http://news.yahoo.com/key-us-east-coast-weather-satellite-goes-13-141636708.html

    Maybe it was fixed, but—at least according to the above referenced article—GOES-14 took over as the main satelite for the East Coast since 2012.

    1. Re:The satelite's been broken for a while! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "GOES 13 returned to normal operations 18 October 2012."

    2. Re:The satelite's been broken for a while! by compro01 · · Score: 1

      GOES 13 went down in September of 2012, then came back online sometime (CBA to find the exact date) in October and was used to monitor Sandy (in parallel with GOES 14). Now it's broken again.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:The satelite's been broken for a while! by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      From TOFA:
      "NOAA is reactivating another satellite, GOES-14, just as the agency did last year when GOES-13 experienced a problem,"

      So, yes, GOES-13 had a problem last year, GOES-14 took over for awhile, apparently GOES-13 got fixed and put back on station.

      Really strange that you had time to go research and read an older article, but not the one in the story.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
  20. It works for earthquakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://blog.xkcd.com/2011/08/24/earthquakes/

    Just set up a script to scan twitter for #hurricane and plot the results.

  21. many would say by nimbius · · Score: 0

    the loss of a forecast satellite is an event that can be computationally determined to a certain degree of accuracy.

    id like to think its all part of gods divine plan to obliterate as much of the bible belt as possible each year.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  22. Re: check the weaths out west by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    Did we just suddenly fall off the fuckin' hurricane map?!?

    Sorry, didn't realize you were still around after that last hurricane.

  23. Forecasting practices by maddog42 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most forecasting is done by meteorologists viewing the predicted conditions based on a numerical model that normally gets run every 12 hours. The model's forecast is usually pretty good out to 72 hours or so. What happens is that an experienced weather-guesser (ex-Navy, here) will look at the model's output (which lags realtime to some degree) and compare the prediction to the actual conditions for the timeframe in question. If the correlation is high, he/she will put more faith into the model's longer term predictions. If the model isn't tracking reality very well, the forecaster will rely on experience rather than the numerical prediction for the longer-range forecast.

    Sounder data from the available weather satellites is used to seed the modelling software as close to its run time as possible, to set up starting conditions for the observable areas. If that data is lacking, the previous model run data closest to the time of the new run is used. (GIGO applies...)

    The realtime data can also come from radiosondes, official observations stations, buoys, or what have you. Losing a bird doesn't mean the forecasting infrastructure will fall apart; it just means that imagery will come from a different source (= different angle, with attendant distortion), and some loss of realtime input for the model run.

  24. Re:Satellite must not have been working for some t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hrmm.. Kinda fits inline with the global warming models. Can't tell me what it's gonna be tomorrow, let alone next week, next month, or 50 years from now.

  25. It probably isn't so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a good chance that the GOES engineers and technicians will be able to get #13 back online. If not, #12 is still operational (though currently covering South America) and #14 is already in orbit and being brought online.

  26. please tell me you've got a ghostbusters sticker by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Please tell me that GOES-R will be sporting some sort of ghostbusters reference...

  27. They saw this coming for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, because of Democrats intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird.

    Everyone will now be screaming blue murder because of the huge negative economic impact this is going to have. Reliable weather prediction is critical for many businesses, including the ones responsible for the food supply.

    I hope the wingnuts are happy.

  28. Re:Satellite must not have been working for some t by malakai · · Score: 1

    I forced refresh my WeatherBug so many times earlier this week. I'm in NYC, and I was dumb founded at how bad the weather reports/predictions were. At one point, I'm standing in the park, it's about 70 degrees, and weather bug says in an hour it's going to be 84 degrees. And hour later it was 71. It stayed under 75 the whole day.

  29. In concert the weather satellite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...GOES to 11!

  30. Show me. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing how there's all this free money from the gov't. Show me where to get it. I got a buddy that fell on hard times. He found out real fast it's not there. Turns out it's damn hard to get all that free gov't cheese if you're not bribing a congressman. Most states fight tooth and nail to stop you from getting health care, housing and food, let alone cash.

    But go ahead. Keep on believing there's this magical gov't safety net waiting there if you stumble. And if you ever do trip up, have fun finding out there's no net to catch you...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Show me. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      To get gov't money as an individual, you have to prove that you're worthless. It helps a lot to claim that you have dependent children.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  31. Psst Noaa Never Used The Data ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOAA never used any 'data' from GOES-1 through GEOS-14 and have plans to ever use data from any satellite.

    'EEEEEEEEEhhhhhhhh nan da'

    Its true !

    NOAA makes it up on the fly using Excel.

    AAAAAhhhhhhh so nan da'

  32. The only way to prevent losses like this by azav · · Score: 1

    We must borrow more trillions of monies from China to invade another country. It's the only way we can prevent losses like this and crumbling infrastructure like the bridge collapse in Washington.

    It's the only way.

    Lichtenstein must pay.

    Sweden will suffer for its smoked herring embargo of New Jersey.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:The only way to prevent losses like this by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Everyone deplores military spending but line up by the thousands for jobs at a defense plant. I worked at one for two years (they make twin engine navel patrol aircraft) and never once saw anyone protesting at the gate. Every congressional district has a military base or supplier in it. No congressman is going to vote against military spending. If he does any spending cuts will be targeted to his district as punishment.