Slashdot Mirror


India To Send World's Last Telegram

New submitter afarhan writes "India will pull the plug on its 160-year-old telegram service on 14 July, this year. This will probably be the last telegram ever sent in the world. However, telegrams are still relevant in this vast country. More than 500 million people are still without access to a phone or Internet. For these people, telegram still remains the only digital communication available. 'At their peak in 1985, 60 million telegrams were being sent and received a year in India from 45,000 offices. Today, only 75 offices exist, though they are located in each of India's 671 districts through franchises. And an industry that once employed 12,500 people, today has only 998 workers.' In India, telegram is also considered a legal correspondence."

205 comments

  1. Probably? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This will probably be the last telegram ever sent in the world. However, telegrams are still relevant in this vast country"

    Probably isn't news.

    1. Re:Probably? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Well, they just figure that by now, every message that can be sent has been, and now everybody can just trade for the message they want to give to someone else.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Probably? by sosume · · Score: 1

      They had me at "More than 500 million people are still without access to a phone or Internet. For these people, telegram still remains the only digital communication available." So they do not have an internet cafe down the road, but a telegraph office instead?

    3. Re:Probably? by guruevi · · Score: 2

      As it mentions, telegraph seems to be a legal correspondence much like faxes are still considered legal correspondence in the US over e-mail or any other type of electronic document exchange. Try sending an e-mail to your local court house even with a digital certificate, they still by-and-large only accept in-person, fax or registered mail. Some countries in Europe have digital certificates for it's citizens which is considered equal to a signature, not so much in the US.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Probably? by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "More than 500 million people are still without access to a phone or Internet."

      How will they use the XBox One??!?

    5. Re:Probably? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How will they use the XBox One??!?

      Easy stop

      zero one zero zero one zero zero one stop zero one zero one zero zero zero zero stop zero zero one zero zero zero zero zero stop zero one one zero one one one one stop zero one one one zero one one zero stop zero one one zero zero one zero one stop zero one one one zero zero one zero stop zero zero one zero zero zero zero zero stop zero one one one zero one zero zero stop zero one one zero zero one zero one stop zero one one zero one one zero zero stop zero one one zero zero one zero one stop zero one one zero zero one one one stop zero one one one zero zero one zero stop zero one one zero zero zero zero one stop zero one one zero one one zero one stop

      How hard can it be questionmark

    6. Re:Probably? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      "This will probably be the last telegram ever sent in the world. However, telegrams are still relevant in this vast country"

      Probably isn't news.

      Well, it could be an opportunity for a ground breaking new "Email via Hand Delivery" patent!
      Also, they could train delivery persons to "sing" the email to the recipient, thus helping employ some of the people that just "couldn't make it" in Bollywood...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    7. Re:Probably? by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      At the call centers where they support them.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    8. Re:Probably? by Anarchduke · · Score: 2
      I can hear it now...

      Viagra cheap from the canadian border,
      Fa la la la fa la la la
      Long erection for a dollar
      Fa la la la fa la la la la

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    9. Re:Probably? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Nooooze, somebody better tell all the illegal Mexican aliens that this Western Union bullshit they use to "telegraph" money back to Mexico is all just cajone-juice.
      How will my chicas get new zapatas now? Aiyiyi! EEEZ that GREEEENGO Obama and heeeeez whore Hillary plotting all theees and trying to blame the Indians now.
      We show you, we weeell vote and the U.S. will be part of Mexico, then, we deport the gringos to Canada where their white asses belong, cabrone.

    10. Re:Probably? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Which is kind of funny since a dc would probably be more trustworthy than a sig.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    11. Re:Probably? by RockDoctor · · Score: 2

      So they do not have an internet cafe down the road, but a telegraph office instead?

      For no small number, there isn't a road to have an internet cafe anywhere "down".

      Have you never lived in the third world?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    12. Re:Probably? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      You are doing it wrong...

      I can hear it now...

      Viagra cheap from the canadian border,
              dit dah dah dah dit dah dah dah
              Long erection for a dollar
              dit dah dah dah dit dah dah dah

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  2. The Last Telegram by interval1066 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reports say that as India pulls the plug on the system the last telegram in its buffers will be Ambassador Zimmerman asking Mexico if it would like to join Germany in attacking America. India reported to be indifferent on the subject.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    1. Re:The Last Telegram by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      ... and this kind of thing is what keeps me coming back to Slashdot. :)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  3. not the world's last by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When Western Union discontinued its telegraph service in 2006, it sold off the network to iTelegram, which inexplicably still seems to be in business.

    1. Re:not the world's last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brazilian post sends telegrams and I wouldn't expect them to stop sending them for a while. It's also considered legally a correspondence in Brazil, and what's more, it's even the suggested form of correspondence in certain legal situations.

      http://www.correios.com.br/voce/enviar/Telegramas.cfm

    2. Re:not the world's last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Western Union did not have any network in the end, they just printed and mailed the telegrams. Check carefully before choosing your telegram provider, there are plenty.

    3. Re:not the world's last by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      When Western Union discontinued its telegraph service in 2006, it sold off the network to iTelegram, which inexplicably still seems to be in business.

      Aside from countries where telegrams have entrenched legal status, I imagine that the 'novelty' market alone could probably sustain a telegraph operator well into the future.

      As long as there is a nonzero supply of people who want to score charm and novelty points by sending somebody a telegram(and they do have some level of popular recognition and ye olde charme from period fiction and pop history), you have a customer base, and it's not as though there is anything requiring you to actually transmit the things in Morse code over copper(which is what would actually be ruinously expensive), so you can just dump them through the internet and pretty-print them at their destination.

    4. Re:not the world's last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MailGram $18.95 includes up to 100 words
      Delivered in 2 to 4 business days. An exceptional value for sending non-urgent messages.

      What a bargain.

    5. Re:not the world's last by bsane · · Score: 2

      This looks like it could conceivably have value:

      http://www.itelegram.com/telegram/contract-cancellation.asp

      Legally accepted time stamped with receipt- much fast than you'd ever get with registered mail.

    6. Re:not the world's last by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Looking at the sample telegram, you can tell that theres at least one diehard Twilight Zone fan in that company.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    7. Re:not the world's last by pjt33 · · Score: 2

      In the UK, the Queen still sends people telegrams on their 100th birthday.

    8. Re: not the world's last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't telegrams - not least because there's no means of receiving one in the UK.

    9. Re:not the world's last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The queen in the Netherlands sent telegrams as well, e.g. to people winning in sports.
      Increasingly, the receivers had never heard of "telegram" before they received it.

      However, she has now stepped down and the new king is from a new generation and
      will probably send a tweet or mail instead.

    10. Re:not the world's last by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      The wikilleak affaire was about telegrams between ambassies that were leaked.

      The queen of the netherlands (now replaced by a king) still sends telegrams to congratulate people.

      The telegram is dead, long live the telegram.

    11. Re: not the world's last by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Someone is delivering the "telegram" to your door. It has always been that way?

    12. Re:not the world's last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she used to but it changed many many years ago to a Telemessage http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/telemessage - which as I recall is more or less you phoned BT they took the message, printed it out and stuck it in the post.

      It's changed again since then.

      You have to apply for it, it isn't automatic, It's more than just 100th Birthdays covered, and it's now Royal Mail Special delivery. Lots more in the FAQ http://www.royal.gov.uk/HMTheQueen/Queenandanniversarymessages/Frequentlyaskedquestions.aspx

      Much more bizarre (to my mind) is the phonegram : http://www.phonegram.com/, nothing tells someone they are special than not bothering to phone yourself but get someone else to do it.

    13. Re:not the world's last by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Not since 1982 when the UK telegram service was discontinued. From the horse's mouth:
      http://www.royal.gov.uk/HMTheQueen/Queenandanniversarymessages/History.aspx

      She sends a 'telemessage', which is a telegram successor but not a telegram.

    14. Re:not the world's last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As long as there is a nonzero supply of people who want to score charm and novelty points by sending somebody a telegram(and they do have some level of popular recognition and ye olde charme from period fiction and pop history), you have a customer base,

      Hipsters aren't nearly as big a market as they think they are, and most of them won't pay for shit.

      and it's not as though there is anything requiring you to actually transmit the things in Morse code over copper(which is what would actually be ruinously expensive), so you can just dump them through the internet and pretty-print them at their destination.

      I think that's exactly what they're doing these days.

      THOUGH YOU MIGHT ACTUALLY WANT TO UGLY PRINT THEM INSTEAD STOP

  4. Another industry killed by the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm old enough to remember when telegrams were still used in the US, mostly at memorial services. They were considered a classy way of someone unable to attend to send their regards for the deceased; the telegrams would be laid out on a table.

    Somehow I don't think email, tweets or e-whatever would be an effective replacement.

    1. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by alen · · Score: 1

      Yep, with old people the old style digital bits are somehow better than the newer ones

    2. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Yep, with old people the old style digital bits are somehow better than the newer ones

      He didn't say anything about the people. Sending a telegram took a fair bit more effort than sending a tweet or an email. I'd say that something like a telegram or a hand written letter does have more value than a quick modern digital communication, if only because it takes more effort to send.

    3. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by KGIII · · Score: 1

      As an old person let me tell you... Telegrams are pretty much the exact opposite of digital bits. They are analog.

      Well, I guess they're not "opposite" really but they're certainly not digital (though they could be made that way). I'm not suggesting you blindly follow your elders or anything but I'm suggesting that you may not know as much as you think you do.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Another industry killed by the Internet by paiute · · Score: 1

      I'm old enough to remember when telegrams were still used in the US, mostly at memorial services. They were considered a classy way of someone unable to attend to send their regards for the deceased; the telegrams would be laid out on a table.

      Somehow I don't think email, tweets or e-whatever would be an effective replacement.

      I don't know - a table covered with smartphones playing videos of people who could not come crying might be cool.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    5. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by dakohli · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I was trained as a wireless operator after high school. I certified in morse code, sending and receiving 20wpm. There was some effort in sending the telegram, but even calculating how much it was going to cost. A good operator could save the sender money by combining words and using shorthand expressions.

      When I was unable to attend either of my brother's weddings, I sent telegrams to congradulate them. Aside from the cost, they represent a level of effort which email or a telephone call just cannot emulate.

    6. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I thought telegrams were transmitted using morse code. That's pretty digital. Trinary bits rather than binary but digital nonetheless.

      The analogue technology superceded telegrams because it could do voice; telephones are only digital again because computers can encode/decode the digital signals a fuck of a lot quicker than a telegram operator.

    7. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. As mentioned in other comments, I've always considered it to be analog but, with further inspection, it appears to be digital. I've been wrong! On the internet! NO!!! *chuckles* I'm still a bit confused but someone cleared it up a bit for me. It seems the duration and the interpretation doesn't matter for this.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we could all laugh at them...

      "Look, he left the sliced onion in the bottom of the frame, noob!"

      "Worst fake crying EVAR!"

      etc.

    9. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      I thought telegrams were transmitted using morse code

      Sure, a century ago they were sent using telegraph wires, but a 'telegram' doesn't mean 'morse code.'

      When Roger O. Thornhill sends a telegram in North by Northwest it would have gone by telex machine. The 'Congratulations!' telegrams we sent and received in my youth were sent by telex.

    10. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still put that much effort into writing an email, just instead of the effort going into the basic act of sending it or just the packaging, you could instead put the effort into the message itself. It will definitely show, to both younger and older people, if you took the time to write something nice, regardless of the medium (well, except maybe for twitter and its size limit). What email does is give you the option to be lazy and to spend low effort on both the means and message.

    11. Re:Another industry killed by the Internet by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'm old enough to remember riding in Grandfather's car into town to send a telegram and watch the operator key it. I'm generally in favour of mod cons but do not subscribe to throwing something useful away because it's not modern.

    12. Re: Another industry killed by the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, this one (Telegraph) has been killed by something completely different: fiber.
      There are no good reason to implement Telex/telegraph on fiber and everybody is moving to fiber.

  5. not the last one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can still send telegrams in russia

    1. Re:not the last one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you can still send telegrams in russia

      Sorry, telegrams send you

    2. Re:not the last one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Ukraine, telegrams are still used at railways, no joke. I've seen them. Alive and well, sometimes a page or two long.

    3. Re: Not the last one by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 2

      Add Japan to the list of countries are still a surviving, if somewhat quaint, custom: http://www.ntt-west.co.jp/service_guide/4useful/useful17.html

    4. Re: Not the last one by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 1

      Also, please insert the phrase "where telegrams are" after the word "countries" in my previous post :)

    5. Re: Not the last one by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Add Japan to the list of countries where telegrams are are? ;)

      It's okay - I'm still stuck on digital vs. analog. I suspect that the systems still in use today are entirely digital (I'd hope they are) with them basically just being email and print services but, well, I'm quite thoroughly lost when we talk about traditional systems.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:not the last one by temcat · · Score: 1

      AFAIK Russian Interstate Aviation Commitee (one of the official aviation bodies) uses telegrams for official announcements â" see for ex. this (in Russian, about Yaroslavl hockey team plane crash): http://zkola.ru/docs/index-640396.html

      Can be pretty pages long and multipart.

  6. Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well sorry for the Article but it's actually false :) Telegram is still alive and kicking in Europe ... for instance in Belgium where you can still send Telegrams right now !
    Here is the national telecommunication operator page about it :

    www.belgacom.be/en/private/products-and-services/fixed-telephony/options-and-services/other-services?page=p_other_services_available
            Telegram

            There are several formulas to choose from:
                    Comfort Telegram
                    A telegram ordered via the post.
                            With an illustration for offering condolences or congratulations.
                            Without an illustration.
                    The Standard National Telegram
                    The "conventional", revised and corrected telegram delivered by Taxipost, our courier service. Telegrams sent before midday are delivered the same day; those sent after midday are delivered the next working day at the latest.
                    The Flash Telegram
                    The quickest method. As soon as our telegraph operators receive your telegram, our courier service makes a special delivery as quickly as possible. It is also possible to send a Flash Telegram and add a gift.

    For international messages, your telegram will be sent by our telegraphists to the country of destination. It is delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of express delivery in the country concerned.

    1. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Mexico as well.

    2. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And the NSA's Project SHAMROCK *still* intercepts every last one of them after all these years.

    3. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Still available in Canada as well. Telegrams Canada used to be run by CNCP Tel. AT&T Canada/Unitel Communications. But still offers full telegram and courier services.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you read that link? You initiate that 'telegram' by sending an email. Then they deliver it to the destination for you. The primary benefit is the courier service.

      Although it's called telegram, you can be sure belgacom doesn't have a pair of operators to translate your email into morse code so it can be sent to the other side. Whereas in India, they literally have someone sitting on a wire clicking short and long signs.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, no telegrams in Europe. Its a service that (from the customers view) works almost like telegrams did and is called "telegrams". There is NO telegram system left in Europe, no wires relays or TX or RX... sorry. Just the same old Internet as everything else.

    6. Re: Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that anyone's manually keying Morse in India either; they're no doubt using teletypes (y'know, those hard-copy terminals whence the legacy jargon "tty" still used in *n*x character special files today?) like every other civilized telegraph surveys did for decades...

    7. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Errr... Is that funny or insightful?

    8. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by seyyah · · Score: 1

      Although it's called telegram, you can be sure belgacom doesn't have a pair of operators to translate your email into morse code so it can be sent to the other side. Whereas in India, they literally have someone sitting on a wire clicking short and long signs.

      That sounds like telegraph, not telegram.

    9. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Zynder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Telegraphs send telegrams. One is a device and one is a group of information. Do try to keep up...

    10. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on... a couple hundred years is quite a short time on a geological time scale.

    11. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teletypes send telegrams. Do try to keep up!

    12. Re:Nope ... Service still available in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can i say...pwned?

  7. Shit... by Skiron · · Score: 1

    ...I am only 53 so I will never get one from the Queen when I am 100. Oh well.

    1. Re:Shit... by Longjmp · · Score: 1

      ...I am only 53 so I will never get one from the Queen when I am 100. Oh well.

      The Queen will probably be a King anyway by that time...
      Ok, you'll never know how long the current one lives, and you'll never know what Charles' next surgery will be, so YMMV ;)

      --
      There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
    2. Re:Shit... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      ...I am only 53 so I will never get one from the Queen when I am 100. Oh well.

      The Queen will probably be a King anyway by that time... Ok, you'll never know how long the current one lives, and you'll never know what Charles' next surgery will be, so YMMV ;)

      Well considering the telegram would have to be 47 years from now, Charles would have to live to 111. Must be a frustrating life, he's now 64 and in an age where most are looking to settle into retirement he's still waiting for the "job" he's been chosen to do from birth. And if her mother is anything like her mother again, it might still take another 15 years because I definitively think this is going to be one of those "over my dead body" successions.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Shit... by Longjmp · · Score: 1

      [...] And if her mother is anything like her mother again, [...]

      You are saying he did it already?

      (Sorry, couldn't resist)

      --
      There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
    4. Re:Shit... by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe Charles realises how lucky he is to be a 64-year-old whose parents are both alive and well and hopes the day never comes when he takes on that "job". The Windsors may not impress me, but don't strike me as being like the Borgias.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    5. Re:Shit... by laejoh · · Score: 1

      We could try digging her up. Kick starting her would be a bitch.

    6. Re:Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't you be happier if the reason was that monarchy was a thing of the past by then?

    7. Re: Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Next!

    8. Re:Shit... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Well considering the telegram would have to be 47 years from now, Charles would have to live to 111. Must be a frustrating life, he's now 64 and in an age where most are looking to settle into retirement he's still waiting for the "job" he's been chosen to do from birth. And if her mother is anything like her mother again, it might still take another 15 years because I definitively think this is going to be one of those "over my dead body" successions.

      I know a lot of us are hoping that Liz outlives Charles. Charles is a nutjob who hasn't found an alternative medicine he doesn't like, and he earns a decent penny selling all kinds of woo.

      We are one elderly woman's heartbeat away from having a fraudster and a lunatic as a head of state. Granted that'd probably improve relations

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  8. digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For these people, telegram still remains the only digital communication available.

    Is this accurate? I don't know much about telegraphs, but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines.

    1. Re:digital? by xs650 · · Score: 1

      Nope, digital.

    2. Re:digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *facepalm*

    3. Re:digital? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Is this accurate? I don't know much about telegraphs, but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines.

      All real world machines are analog, but the communication is digital (signal/no signal). SOS = ... --- ... = 101010001110111011100010101 (for human convenience a dash is three dots long as is the pause between letters, seven between words). I agree it's an odd wording though, with that logic the blind have been reading digital books for ages - with their digits, even.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:digital? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Is this accurate? I don't know much about telegraphs, but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines.

      Even the very early (1700s) experimental telegraphs have been about delivering the codes for each letter in the alphabet, in a quantified manner. So by nature the telegraph has always been digital by its design.

    5. Re:digital? by bmo · · Score: 1

      > but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines

      Nope. It's digital. Two states, dot and dash. You could do a 1 for 1 binary encode.

      As a matter of fact, the analog telephone system was a hack of a digital system.

      --
      BMO

    6. Re:digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For these people, telegram still remains the only digital communication available.

      Is this accurate? I don't know much about telegraphs, but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines.

      As you only use fingers to press the switch, they are digital, unless you use your entire hand in which case they would be manual. And a very few telegraphs are podial or foot operated, mostly for special needs telegraphists who have lost their hands.

    7. Re:digital? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      For these people, telegram still remains the only digital communication available.

      Is this accurate? I don't know much about telegraphs, but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines.

      well these telegrams as I understand it are not morsed over or any shit like that anyways. it just means you send the message - and it's moved electronically somewhere and printed out and someone delivers the message somehow. it pretty much depends just on what you call such a service now.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:digital? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      They are analog but for the sake of brevity there's no correct answer to this one as far as I can tell. Here's someone who's put the time into authoring a reply to this very idea:

      http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080817073539AAhrHHM

      The short answer is, well, call 'em analog. They *can* be digital. I suspect that most modern "telegraph" services are entirely digital. They also use just the 1 really. With Morse code they don't use the "off" dead-space for anything either really. SOS would be ... --- ... which is on, on, on, on longer, on longer, on longer, on, on, on.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:digital? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Now your post makes me ponder more...

      See, you forget off and the variety in key styles. Hmm... I'm so confused. LOL I've long since thought it was analog but, now that I think about it... It really only has two states - on and off and the on state is varied in duration which is a part of why I've felt it was analog all these times.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:digital? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > SOS = ... --- ... = 101010001110111011100010101

      I'd say it's more like:
      10101000 11111100 10101001

      Morse requires two bits to encode each symbol:

      10 = dit (short)
      11 = dah (long)
      00 = character-marker
      01 = word-marker

      (other combos possible; though most would agree that the obvious alternative would be 10, 11, 00, and 01 (in order) for the choices above).

      You can also represent all known Morse characters as 8-bit bytes by establishing a rule that 0=dit/short, 1=dah/long, and the last one is whichever value (0 or 1) differs from the least significant identical bits. Ex:

      e = . = 01111111
      i = .. = 00111111
      t = - = 10000000
      a = .- = 01000000
      5 = ..... = 00000111
      ? = ..--.. = 00110011

      I believe both schemes are used in the real world... the first to represent Morse as received, the second to encode the lookup tables.

    11. Re:digital? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      ^^^ Argh. Bitten by preview-blindness after major editing. Ignore this line in the post above:

      (other combos possible; though most would agree that the obvious alternative would be 10, 11, 00, and 01 (in order) for the choices above)

      or pretend it says:

      (other combos possible; though most would agree that the obvious alternative would be 00, 01, 10, and 11 (in order) for the choices above).

    12. Re:digital? by dakohli · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Morse code does not necessarily a binary system. If sent by a machine, I could buy that, but it was designed to be sent by humans using a key. Later a two paddle bug was often used to speed up the code. One paddle sent a stream of dits, and the other keyed the dahs. you could vary the speed of the dits using a dial, but you varied the dahs using the paddle itself. Good operators would shorten the dahs, and use the fastest dits they could manage. So, you might use a dit from 40 wpm, but a dah from 45 wpm. The end result was code that was fairly easy to decode by a human operator, but difficult to decode by a machine. The best machines that I saw had an accuracy of about 85%, which was not good enough.

      Later electronic bugs had two paddles that shaped both the dits and the dahs, but because the operator varied the space in between the elements you ended up with the same issues

      A digital replacement for morse code was the Baudot Code

      .This used machine generated and read code. Early systems used a punch tape as storage medium.

      I was a trained and certified Wireless Station Operator, when I first qualified I could send and receive 20> wpm using a stick (pencil) and hand key

    13. Re:digital? by dakohli · · Score: 1

      Morse Code was predigital. It was on and off keyed using an unmodulated carrier designed to be sent my human operators. There are variations between the length of the elements, the space between the elements, the space between letters and words. This is more a language than code, experienced operators did not hear letters, they heard words. Speeds up to and past 60 wpm were not unheard of. And there were no machines up until recently that could compete with the accuracy of a human operator.

    14. Re:digital? by nashv · · Score: 1

      As long as information is encoded in a sequence of 2 states, it is digital - period. Any real world machine, is usually analog. The SIGNAL on the other hand, as encoded, detected and interpreted, is digital.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    15. Re:digital? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That makes sense - but is this really two states? It is on, off, on for a longer duration. I'm pretty certain that I've been wrong all these years and that it is digital (I'm okay with admitting that). I'm still pretty curious though - I linked a handy link in there that describes it a bit. It is binary, binary is digital. Hmm... So, yeah, I guess it'd be digital.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    16. Re:digital? by bmo · · Score: 1

      > There are variations between the length of the elements, the space between the elements, the space between letters and words.

      This does not make it analog.

      If it did, then we would say that stuff piped down an RS232 cable is analog, but it isn't.

      --
      BMO

    17. Re:digital? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      This does not make it analog.

      right, it's a self-clocking digital signal. But it's quinary, not binary, as the symbol space, the letter space, and the word space are all significant (as well as dot and dash, of course).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    18. Re:digital? by bromoseltzer · · Score: 2

      Morse is the orginal digital system, being sent with the fingers.

      --
      Fiat Lux.
    19. Re:digital? by Nutria · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty certain that I've been wrong all these years and that it is digital

      "On", "Off" and "On Longer" are discrete and thus digital.

      In fact, "digital" doesn't need to only encode 2 values: remember that the word "digital" is the adjective form of "digit", and we have 10 discrete fingers. (Which is why we count in decimal and computers, which have only two discrete values, counts in binary.)

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    20. Re:digital? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Morse is the orginal digital system, being sent with the fingers.

      Counting -- with natural numbers -- is the original digital system, being sent with with our 10 digits.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    21. Re:digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O/T but out of curiosity: Have you ever sent Morse code through other means? That is, using a flashlight or the proper hand (flag) signals? I'm a sailing enthusiast and have tried to learn Morse code out of respect for old naval traditions and as a backup to radio in case of complete power failure (same reason for astronomical navigation). What is it like compared with listening? My experience so far has been with practice software because no one I know is interested enough to learn for just experimenting with flashlights or flags?

      And as you might or might not know, radar beacons (RACONs) are "lighthouses" with special radar reflectors that leave their ID letter as a trail of multiple reflections behind them in a Morse code pattern to make recognizing them on radar screens easier. But that's simply too easy even for me :)

    22. Re:digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital is a subset of analog.

    23. Re:digital? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, sir, on learning to use a computer!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    24. Re:digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is 1000baseT.

    25. Re:digital? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      LOL Don't go confusing me any more than is required. I figured that it was analog because it was on, off, on for a longer duration (thus three states) and because the individual who keys the code is different (I guess that some folks are so unique that they can be identified by their key style) and that difference would make it analog. I have learned something (somethings) new though and that's valuable.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    26. Re:digital? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it makes sense. The duration seems to have nothing to do with it. I always figured that the differences in keying and the varied states made it analog. 'Tis not every day that I get to learn something new so much appreciated.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:digital? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      with that logic the blind have been reading digital books for ages

      So have regular people, albeit with a "base" big enough to hold alphanumeric characters plus symbols (about 60- or 70-something for most English text).

      The blind have been reading binary (raised dot/no raised dot) books for ages.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    28. Re:digital? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Mod parent +5 +/- noise insightful

      where noise is significantly less than 0.5

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    29. Re:digital? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      And a very few telegraphs are podial or foot operated

      Foot-pedal-keys are used in the amateur radio world.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    30. Re:digital? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Well, it is still a system of "ON" and "OFF" at the physical layer, I would call that binary, wouldn't you?

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  9. Not the last telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last telegram? Hardly, telegrams are still widely used in Brazil by the government

    1. Re:Not the last telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has never been about thoroughly-researched BBC/Reuters quality news, and I'm just fine with it. But it's sometimes a bit funny how obviously wrong information the summaries can include. The fact that telegraphy is still used in many parts of the world could have been easily confirmed.

    2. Re:Not the last telegram by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      In this case the actual story is itself incorrect. Still, it wouldn't have been too difficult to research this one:

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=telegrams

      Slash is a news aggregator, and it's best to assume that summaries submitted by the the public will be of a pretty low standard. A Slashdot editor only has two things to do before posting a story.

      1) Confirm the subject matter is kind of relevant and/or will generate some activity
      2) Check for illegal or offensive content (including clicking the links).

      No need to fact-check a story. In the future it's a job that'll be done by scripts, if that's not already the case. I welcome our robot overlords and would send them a congratulatory telegram if only telegrams existed anywhere outside of India.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  10. Digital. by dtmos · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about telegraphs, but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines.

    No, they're a form of digital communication; they use on-off keying (OOK).

    1. Re:Digital. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Not only that, they're digital communication with the first known implementation of Huffman coding as a form of data compression :-D

    2. Re:Digital. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I've been pondering this... They're binary aren't they? Does the fact that it is binary confer digital status automatically? They signal does vary, it has long tones, off, and short tones. Each is different according to the key user. I've always considered it analog for those reasons BUT I'm now pondering and think I may have been mistaken all those years. (My ego isn't so frail that I'm bothered by being mistaken. How else would I learn?)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Digital. by nashv · · Score: 2

      It does not matter that the long and short tones vary. For example, the voltage from a transistor on a chip will regularly vary over a few millivolts. The point is that , the variation doesn't encode anything. All the information is encoded in a sequence that has 2 states. Is the voltage greater than 5mV or less than 1 mV. That makes it digital.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    4. Re:Digital. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That too makes sense. Thanks. :)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Digital. by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about telegraphs, but I'm pretty sure they're analog machines.

      No, they're a form of digital communication; they use on-off keying (OOK).

      Not in Australia, when we still had them. Aussie telegraph machines used a 5 character Baudot coding, with voltage levels high enough to operate relays directly. At least the last mile to the customer premises operated that way.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baudot_code

      Since India was also ex-British Empire, I suspect it also operated that way.

    6. Re:Digital. by Nutria · · Score: 1

      5 character Baudot coding

      That's 5 bit encoding, which makes it digital.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    7. Re:Digital. by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Aussie telegraph machines used a 5 character Baudot coding

      Someone once told me that in Australia all of their 0's and 1's were upside-down.

      I checked and you know what, they were right!

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  11. Only 1K? by kms_one · · Score: 1

    Funny that they use the word "only" when saying that a thousand people are still employed in the telegram industry there.

    1. Re:Only 1K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. in a country of a billion people

    2. Re:Only 1K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a country with 1.24b people, having 1000 people employed makes it a "only" lol. There is probably more people employed as snake handlers or some other obscure industry.

      Hell, if every single person in the telegram industry in India was part of a different ethnic group, it would only be representative of less then half of the ethnic groups in India.

      Source

  12. Required Telegram Joke by bradorsomething · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is appears the article is wrong about telegram services ending over all, and they actually won't Stop

    1. Re:Required Telegram Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tangentially relevant: Transmission

    2. Re:Required Telegram Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is appears the article is wrong about telegram services ending over all, and they actually won't Stop

      "The report of its death is an exaggeration."

    3. Re:Required Telegram Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should have read: stop STOP

  13. D'oh ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegraphy#Worldwide_status_of_telegram_services

    1. Re:D'oh ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegraphy#Worldwide_status_of_telegram_services

      Oops. Looks like the Monitor reporter didn't get the Telex.

    2. Re:D'oh ! by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Telegraphy just feels like a really old, mundane tech, easily replaceable by newer methods anywhere, so at least I could have easily believed that that telegram in India was actually the last one in world. If I didn't have any other information sources, that is.

  14. and in the usa faxes are legal correspondences as by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and in the usa faxes are legal correspondences as well

  15. National Traffic System by dtmos · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in an amateur, as opposed to a commercial, version of a radiotelegraph network, have a look at the National Traffic System. This system, created in the 1940s, has many features that predate modern digital networks, including a Request To Send / Clear To Send (RTS/CTS) system, and separate logical channels for network control and data.

    1. Re:National Traffic System by charlesr44403 · · Score: 1

      The founder of the NTS, George Hart W1NJM, died recently at age 99. By separate channels I think you mean net frequency and side channels to pass traffic? What do you mean by RTS/CTS in NTS?

    2. Re:National Traffic System by davidwr · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by RTS/CTS in NTS?

      I'm guessing he means the handshake protocols where the sender asks the receiver if he's ready to receive, and doesn't send until he gets confirmation.

      NTS also has some rudimentary error-detection/correction built in:

      The sender will tell the receiver how many words are in the message. If the receiver does't get the exact number of words or if he has any other reason to think the message wasn't properly received, he will notify the sender and they will try again. If the word count matches and the receiver doesn't believe there are any errors, he will tell the sender that the message was received.

      If the sender does NOT receive that final confirmation, he will assume the message was not sent and will try sending it again either right then or later.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    3. Re:National Traffic System by dtmos · · Score: 1

      By separate channels I think you mean net frequency and side channels to pass traffic? What do you mean by RTS/CTS in NTS?

      Yes, in the NTS the net is controlled by the net control station (NCS), but the actual message-passing is done on a side frequency, without the direct involvement of the NCS. In this way, the NCS does not have to handle all of the traffic handled by the network, so its workload is much less. The workload of message-passing is shared among the other stations in the network (principally by the regional net representatives, a task that can be rotated among stations in the network), and is performed largely in parallel to network control functions, which increases time efficiency.

      By RTS/CTS I meant the code symbol(s) sent by those wishing to join the net. While in operation the NCS periodically sends open requests to join the network ("QNI"), then stands by for responses. Stations wishing to join the net then send a short signal (usually a single Morse character, often the first letter of their call sign suffix). The NCS then repeats the signal of the station it authorizes to transmit, and that station then begins its transmission.

      This is akin to beacon transmissions in a modern wireless digital network, followed by a contention-access period (CAP); during the CAP the stations send their RTS signal (the single Morse character), and the NCS sends a CTS signal by repeating the character. The station authorized to transmit then does so.

  16. Telegrams make more sense in Hindi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's a little know fact that in Hindi, all words can be formed from "uh" and "duh" very rapidly, thus a telegram slightly modified to sound like "uh duhduhduh uhhh duhduhduh uh duh duhduh" translates almost directly to "Thank you, come again."

  17. Also telex by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    In 1997 I has at the US consulate in Melbourne organising visas for myself and my then partner. It got complicated and the consulate had to send a telex to the US to deal with the issue. Obviously we used email for organising the rest of the trip.

    1. Re:Also telex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1997 I has at the US consulate in Melbourne organising visas for myself and my then partner. It got complicated and the consulate had to send a telex to the US to deal with the issue. Obviously we used email for organising the rest of the trip.

      I don't know about 1997, but today's embassy cables are actually emails that are logged and retained according to strict procedures. (They even use Microsoft Outlook.) I believe the previous system was an encrypted satellite-based system.

      http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2010/11/whats_a_diplomatic_cable.html

  18. Not the last one by houghi · · Score: 2

    In Belgium you can still send a telegram.
    So no idea where this idea comes from that it isn't available anywhere anymore. If Belgium has it and even has International AND Intercontinental prices, there must be at least two other countries that have it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  19. MIGRATING by arielCo · · Score: 5, Funny

    TELEGRAPH SERVICE SHUTTING DOWN TELL MOTHER RAJESH MUST LEARN TWITTER FOLLOW ME AT ANAND UNDERSCORE BANDYOPADHYAY STOP

    (Silly filter, telegrams *are* printed in all caps). Lorem ipsum something something dies irae dies illa solvet seclum in favilla.

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    1. Re:MIGRATING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STOP

    2. Re:MIGRATING by stox · · Score: 2

      The reason they are all CAPS is that they are transmitted using Baudot Code, a 5 level code with no lower case and a very limited set of symbols.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    3. Re:MIGRATING by arielCo · · Score: 1

      Good - I knew that the character set was limited but not the name of the code. Now Anand can use punctuation for free. (:

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    4. Re:MIGRATING by Longjmp · · Score: 1

      [...] are transmitted using Baudot Code, a 5 level code [...]

      Thus telegraph messages were usually preceded with "CZCZ" (or something similar) to make sure you are in "letter shift", i.e. the following characters were letters, not numbers or special characters.

      --
      There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
    5. Re:MIGRATING by BenBoy · · Score: 1

      dies irae dies illa solvet seclum in favilla.

      ... Requiem for Telegraph ...

    6. Re:MIGRATING by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Actually, companies like Siemens recognized even in those days that lowercase is easier on the eye than UPPERCASE and many
      of their telex machines printed only lowercase.

    7. Re:MIGRATING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same encoding used by AOL for email I presume?

    8. Re:MIGRATING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be a Telex ?

    9. Re:MIGRATING by arielCo · · Score: 1

      Unintended but fitting. I just couldn't be arsed to google the whole Lorem ipsum filler (:

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  20. SOS by dtmos · · Score: 1

    SOS, as an emergency indicator, is a single symbol, not three separate letters -- di-di-di-dah-dah-dah-di-di-dit or, in your notation, 10101011101110111010101.

  21. Just tweet the text by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    It's more or less the same, right?

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  22. Off-Topic Reply by KGIII · · Score: 0

    Err... Umm... This has nothing to do with your post or the conversation at hand.

    Err... I'm no grammar Nazi or anything but, well, shouldn't that be *fewer* illiterates - actually - shouldn't it be *more* illiterates than people who can't read? As in there are illiterate people who can read but just not grasp what they're reading at any level that is reasonably higher than one would assume they should be able to read at... (That's the ugliest sentence I've typed all day. I'm strangely proud of it. I have absolutely no right to be.)

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    1. Re:Off-Topic Reply by Longjmp · · Score: 1

      [...] shouldn't that be *fewer* illiterates [...]

      Yes it should.
      Initially it was my own sloppiness, my mistake.
      However, I was using that sig for quite some time (not slashdot even) before anyone noticed the mistake and corrected me, so I decided to keep it the way it was, with the mistake, since it seemed (seems) to prove my statement.

      What it means, you almost got it right, it's just the opposite ;)
      In any educated country, there are far more people who can read than there are illiterates.
      However, of those people who are able to read, many do not think about what they are reading; and thus failing to comprehend what they are reading.
      In a way, they recoginze the words, but fail to get the meaning because they are too lazy to think.

      Hope that helped

      --
      There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
    2. Re:Off-Topic Reply by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why I added the bit about it being *more* illiterates. It's unfortunate but it is the way it is. The end result is ignorance, blind allegiance to power, blind partisanship, racism, etc... Ah well... Ride it 'til the wheels fall off I suppose.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  23. dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = digit by raymorris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More than just digital, they are BINARY.

    Analog: composed of continuously variable values
    Digital: composed of discreet values
    Binary: composed of two possible values

    Since traditional telegraphs consist of only dots and dashes, they are digital, and binary. If they were analog, they would include "dot and a half", with infinite valid values between dot and dash.

  24. Still alive in Brazil by jtoj · · Score: 1

    Brazilians still enjoy the availability of telegrams through ECT - Empresa de Correios e Telegrafos ECT - National and International Telegrams.
    There is a LARGE list of countries that would receive telegrams. It may be posted the old fashined way, at the post office, or by modern tools like internet or phone.
    Brazilian state controlled ECT (T stands for Telegraphs) sends and receives telegrams nationally and internationally (to and from India?).
    Some places in Brazil do not have electricity, and telegram is also considered a legal correspondence. Probably the only possible one.
    In rural areas you myst stop by the post office once every few days to collect your mail, and telegrams.

    --
    Jose T Oliveira Jr.
  25. Last Telegram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In argentina, law requires that if you get fired, you are let know by telegram. A bit outdated maybe, but the way things are going here (like shit, for those blissfully ignorant of argentinian affairs) telegram is being used a lot.

    A whole damn lot.

  26. Re:dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = di by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I was finding this to add to it actually. I didn't think my response was clear or necessarily correct which made me scroll up to find it. It's a bit of a difficult thing to classify it, I gave a link below that gave a pretty decent description of it. One of the curious things is that the "off" status isn't used. There is long on and short on (with at least Morse, there may be other types). It's binary in nature which is what I should have said. Binary, by itself, doesn't (I'm pretty sure but may be mistaken) confer "digital" status.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  27. We should really answer the question by cheesecake23 · · Score: 1

    I think it's about time to answer the original question:

    42 STOP

  28. M * A * S * H by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Hawkeye: Dear Dad, I am not dead. Stop. Hope you are the same. Stop. Thinking of selling my golf clubs? Stop. Spending my insurance money? Stop.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  29. Re:and in the usa faxes are legal correspondences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no such thing as "legal correspondence", at least not in the United States. Unlike other legal systems--especially Civil Law systems--Common Law systems have very few magic processes. All that matters in the Common Law is evidence, evidence, evidence. It's why it was always unnecessary to pass new laws to make electronic contracts binding. The courts were perfectly able to adapt themselves.

    However, some evidence has more weight than others, if only because it's less common to fake (or, conversely, dispute) and is thus more credible in court. Faxes are preferred over e-mail because it's easier to prove that the other end received it--you get a nice printed confirmation from your fax machine, plus the phone company has a record of the call, and it's much easier to decipher that record than a Sendmail log.

    What about serving papers? Same thing. There's nothing magical about some paralegal serving you papers. It's just that it's extremely difficult to claim that you didn't receive them when a practiced professional will tell the judge that not only are you lying, he's the one who actually handed you the papers. If you were never served papers but already had actual knowledge--and that knowledge could be shown--of whatever was held in the papers, then you'd still be responsible for that knowledge.

    Again, it's all about evidence and proof. That's all. No magic is involved.

  30. Re:NEXT UP !! PAVE SOME ROADS !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Common misconception. Silly, really. Sacred cows? Nonsense. It's the rat that's sacred in India. Believe it or not (it's your long departed relative).

  31. Re:dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = di by weav · · Score: 1

    Actually AFAIK they were sent using 5-bit Baudot code since around the '20s. Could be off by a decade or two.
    Hand-sent-and-received Morse went out a while back.

  32. I got a telegram once by readingaccount · · Score: 1

    It told me to not pick number 77. Did so anyway, boy was that a mistake.

  33. Service still available in Venezuela by williamyf · · Score: 1

    So it seems I can send a telegram inside venezuela, and to belgium at least, but not to indi come next month. Ok, I'll keep that in mind....

    From the post operator in Venezuela:
    http://www.ipostel.gob.ve/servicios.html

    Telegrama: Es un escrito destinado a ser transmitido por telegrafía para su entrega al destinatario, con cobertura nacional e internacional.

    Modalidades del Telegrama:

    Telegrama Ordinario: Son los telegramas cuya aceptación es obligatoria y no lleva ninguna indicación de servicio.

    Telegrama Urgente: Son telegramas a los cuales se les da prioridad para su transmisión y entrega al destinatario.

    PC (Acuse de Recibo): Confirmación de entrega (Opcional según la necesidad del cliente).

    Giros Telegráficos: A través de nuestros Centros de Atención al Cliente autorizados, a escala nacional, usted puede ordenar un pago a favor de personas naturales y/o jurídicas, la cual será cancelada en su totalidad en la oficina de destino, poniendo a disposición de nuestros clientes, nuestra extensa red de oficinas a nivel nacional.

    Telefonograma: Al comunicarse con nuestra línea gratuita de Atención al Cliente 0800 IPOSTEL o 405-3078, usted puede enviar un mensaje telegráfico o telegrama a través de una llamada telefónica. El cobro de este servicio será cargado a su factura CANTV.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  34. Irony by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The end of the article gave me a chuckle. A guy is threatening to go on a hunger strike to keep the service going, insisting that it's a vital tool for fighting corruption ( presumably gov't corruption ) He sent his demands to the PM and others, via telegram of course. But someone at the telegraph office viewed the telegram as "objectionable" and have chosen not to deliver it.

    So while India might still accept telegrams as legal documents, having a communications medium that requires a man-in-the-middle to function seems to be one that is too easily thwarted by the man in the middle.

    Hopefully the guy on the hunger strike backed up his telegram with an email.

    1. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So while India might still accept telegrams as legal documents, having a communications medium that requires a man-in-the-middle to function seems to be one that is too easily thwarted by the man in the middle.

      If moderators, on youtube, do not like the political message of your video, they may pull the video. Or they may mark it as “Following content has been identified by YouTube community as potentially offensive or inappropriate. Viewer discretion advised.”

      See for yourself:

      http://www.youtube.com/verify_controversy?next_url=/watch%3Fv%3DgxGUkbsdCk4%26feature%3Dyoutu.be

  35. binary is a subset of digital, by definition by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    > binary, by itself, doesn't (I'm pretty sure but may be mistaken) confer "digital" status.

    The defining distinction between digital and analog is that analog can represent a continuous range, whereas digital can only represent specific values. A phonograph, for example, can represent an infinite range of values between silence and full volume. A CD, on the other hand, can only encode certain volumes, not any in between. That's what makes a phonograph analog and a CD digital. Therefore, binary is BY DEFINITION digital - it uses just two values, not an infinite range

    That's good and bad for both. With digital, you get back EXACTLY what you debt, with no degradation. With analog, you can receive a signal even if it can't be received perfectly, because it can receive 0.46 when its not possible to distinguish between 0 and 1.

    1. Re:binary is a subset of digital, by definition by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      With digital, you get back EXACTLY what you debt, with no degradation. With analog, you can receive a signal even if it can't be received perfectly, because it can receive 0.46 when its not possible to distinguish between 0 and 1.

      It's the other way round. With digital, the signal can withstand significant degradation. If noise mangles your 0 to 0.4 and your one to 0.6, you can still distinguish between the two and get back a perfect representation of the input signal. With analog, any noise will degrade the signal irreversibly. A signal of 0.46 plus or minus 0.4 in noise is mangled beyond recognition.

      Luckily, the human ear and brain are pretty good at extracting meaning from noisy signals, so even a bad phone connection can still be used to convey some information.

      Possibly what you meant is graceful degradation. If the noise grows to more than 0.5, the digital signal abruptly becomes impossible to decipher. An analog channel in these conditions can still be used to convey some information, but at vastly reduced bandwidth. Going back to the bad phone connection, you'll be spending most of your time asking the other party to repeat what they said.

    2. Re:binary is a subset of digital, by definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly what you meant is graceful degradation. If the noise grows to more than 0.5, the digital signal abruptly becomes impossible to decipher.

      Even then, you can make things a lot more reliable with forward error correction. Was there any real error correction capabilities ever available for analog transmissions?

  36. summary: digital signals over analog media by raymorris · · Score: 1

    To summarize the Yahoo answer, copper wire can carry a range of voltages , so it CAN carry an ANALOG signal.
    It can also carry a digital signal like Morse or Baudot, which is what telegrams use.

    Radio is exactly the same way - it can carry analog signal such as old fashioned AM ratio, or a digital signal like GSM.

    1. Re:summary: digital signals over analog media by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Much thanks. I always figured the variation in signal was what made it analog. I am not sure what made me think that, that and a few other things. I've been pretty sure it was analog for years but, yeah, it makes sense that it is digital. (My ego's not frail and I love to learn new things.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  37. oh noes! by PPH · · Score: 1

    the navy is ceasing its use of all caps as well. what's this world coming to?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  38. What's the meaning of the 2nd "T" in AT&T ? by Cliff+Stoll · · Score: 1

    My first job was delivering telegrams (by bicycle) in downtown Buffalo during the 1960's.
    My Western Union office had its hours posted on the door: "We Never Close". The building's been torn down, so, in a sense, the message turned out to be true.

    Question: what'll happen to the American Telephone and Telegraph Corporation?

    Here in Berkeley, one of the main drags is Telegraph Avenue and a cell-phone store is named "Telegraph Wireless"

    1. Re:What's the meaning of the 2nd "T" in AT&T ? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The word "telegraph" will likely have the same meaning as it, and words like 'telephone' have today - roughly, more or less nothing, except for the objects they directly referred to.

      The Internet is, after all, a telegraph of sorts. It isn't The Telegraph System, but the literal meaning of the word is consistent. And we don't use telephones anymore, either - we mostly use a digitally switched network and pigeonholed handsets, which have data encapsulated from the calls in IP.

      In short, I doubt much will change; streets named after people who then pass away do not have their names changed; companies often keep their name after their original meaning is no longer meaningful (eg. local companies expanding but retaining the original location's name as part of their own).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:What's the meaning of the 2nd "T" in AT&T ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first job was delivering telegrams (by bicycle) in downtown Buffalo during the 1960's.
      My Western Union office had its hours posted on the door: "We Never Close". The building's been torn down, so, in a sense, the message turned out to be true.

      Question: what'll happen to the American Telephone and Telegraph Corporation?

      Here in Berkeley, one of the main drags is Telegraph Avenue and a cell-phone store is named "Telegraph Wireless"

      American Telephone & Telegraph Corporation went out of business in 2005, when it was bought out by SBC Communications.

        The new company name, "AT&T Inc.", stands for "AT&T Incorporated ."

      You know, sort of like how "BP", that petroleum company in Britain, which was known as British Petroleum before 1998, doesn't stand for anything.

  39. Re:NEXT UP !! PAVE SOME ROADS !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All mammals are long departed relatives. As are all animals, and all other life on this planet..

  40. Re:NEXT UP !! PAVE SOME ROADS !! by khallow · · Score: 2

    A common misconception shared by a lot of Hindus in India. For example, there was a 1857 rebellion that started because Indian soldiers were required to bite the ends off of bullet cartridges (it was part of the loading process for rifles of the time) coated with animal fat (allegedly both beef and pig, which offends just about optimally).

  41. Service still available in Argentina by DVega · · Score: 1

    Service is still available in Argentima national post offices. About 3 usd per 20 words http://www.correoargentino.com.ar/precios/telegramas/nacionales

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
    1. Re:Service still available in Argentina by bmuon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I can't find any information that clarifies if the technology under the legal telegram is still the old telegraph or if it was replaced with something new.

  42. Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What have god wroth....

  43. MISTAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They misinterpreted that last STOP.

  44. Telegrams in Italy are all but dead by farenka · · Score: 1

    Just few weeks ago I received a telegram by the local Visa anti fraud team: PLEASE CONTACT US ABOUT YOUR CARD ENDING WITH NUMBER XXXX.

  45. Re:dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = di by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since traditional telegraphs consist of only dots and dashes, they are digital, and binary.

    Actually no. Silences are meaningful in morse, so it's ternary, not binary.

  46. You're awesome by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The ability and willingness to learn when a mistake is pointed out publicly makes you smarter than 98% of Slashdotters,I would guess.

    1. Re:You're awesome by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I value learning? I don't have a small ego either I suppose. I don't ignore those who disagree with me - in fact I give them more attention. How else am I going to learn anything? I may have aged but that doesn't mean that I've learned all there is to learn. Either way, I appreciate the compliment and maybe it will impact other people? Admitting mistakes and learning from them is a part of growth, it is possible (even enjoyable) to be mistaken once in a while and to learn from it.

      Anyhow, thank you for the compliment and for noticing. I have, indeed, witnessed folk who would deny their mistake even in the face of insurmountable evidence to the contrary. I'm not sure what motivates them but I assume that it is ego. Frankly, we're online. This is the ONE place where you can be completely and totally honest. It is strange, really, that people see it as the other way around. Ah well, I'd rather avoid digressing into the novella realm.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  47. If you do this I'll kill myself! by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    The telegram was from A.P. Tripathi, who runs an anticorruption nonprofit in Lucknow. Addressed to the president, prime minister, the minister for communications, and others, it said that he would engage in a Gandhian fast unto death if telegram services were shut down, and if he died, then the addressed officials would be responsible.

    Man threatens to starve himself to death and claims that I'm the one to blame. I can't see any way to respond to this other than to say "sure, sounds good".

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  48. Saw that one coming. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Ok, ok, we get it. OP is telegraphing the end of telegraphy.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  49. Re:dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = di by Sique · · Score: 3, Informative

    You even have short and long silences, thus we are talking base 4.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  50. Re:dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = di by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than just digital, they are BINARY.

    Analog: composed of continuously variable values
    Digital: composed of discreet values
    Binary: composed of two possible values

    Since traditional telegraphs consist of only dots and dashes, they are digital, and binary. If they were analog, they would include "dot and a half", with infinite valid values between dot and dash.

    UM, TRINARY. If you exclude the spaces between dots and dashes, you can't tell where the letter boundaries are.

  51. Still available in Brazil by thetagger · · Score: 1

    Telegrams are still available in Brazil. You can only send them through the Internet though - phone was discontinued a few years ago, telegraphs were discontinued a few decades ago.

    Their only remaining use is as a legal document. With telegrams you can certify that you notified someone of X on date Y, or at least that you tried to. If you receive a telegram you are probably being sued by someone and the telegram is the "last resort" communication that is often required by law or at least recommended to show you made a good faith effort to settle things before going to court.

    Prior to email it was common to use telegrams to congratulate distant relatives on their birthday, since you could schedule delivery to the exact day.

  52. The last telegram message by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    The first telegram message was taken from Numbers 23:23 (King James Bible) "What hath God wrougth". It's perhaps interesting that Numbers 23:27 for tells Online trolling: being able to ineffectually curse someone at a distance.

    If this were Slashdot then the last 100 telegrams would be from people racing to be the last to send a message and all of them would be the same message, namely
    "Last Post!"

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  53. Re:dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = di by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    Actually, Morse code uses 4 characters, not just two. Dot, dash (combination of which identify the letter), short space (separates letters from each other) and long space (separates words from each other). Without the spaces it would not be possible to distinguish between, say, "TAE", "TR", "NN" and "C" (dash dot dash dot).

    If it was binary, then a space between letters (start/stop bits) and between words (0x20) would be encoded by some combination of dots and dashes.

  54. math pwned by peacefool · · Score: 1

    "only 75 offices exist, though they are located in each of India's 671 districts..." ?!

  55. I think that I see the problem ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    At their peak in 1985, 60 million telegrams were being sent and received a year in India from 45,000 offices.

    I make that 1333 telegrams per office per year, or 4 and a bit per day. Five and a bit if the office was closed at weekends. Say, a half an hour of work per operator per day, since telegrams were charged by the word, so people were terse ("PECCAVI").

    And that was the peak of the system's use.

    I bet that this is a figure for the general public's use of the system, and that the large majority of the system's traffic was carried for some separate reason, for example, with the telegraph cables laid alongside railway routes, and the bulk of the traffic being the railway's scheduling. Messages like "14:24 (a train left signal box) 14-56-34 (on line) 235 (and has ETA at signal box) 14-56-33 (at approx) 15:15".

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  56. Legality of faxes by davidwr · · Score: 1

    In a perfect world where caller-ID can't be spoofed, a fax from a "registered" fax machine that is known to be run by people trusted by the state to not forge signatures makes sense.

    Otherwise, it's open for abuse.

    I don't know if it's still the case, but when faxes first became "legal" ways to send signed documents in the USA, they typically had to be followed up by hardcopy signature within a specified period of time, a week I think.

    At least with hardcopy, if you suspect a forged signature you can usually test the paper for fingerprints.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  57. It's binary: current / no current by davidwr · · Score: 1

    It's still binary: current, no current.

    SOS SOS

    would be ...---... ...---...

    which in current terms (C=current, N=no current) is
    CNCNCNNNCCCNCCCNCCCNNNCNCNCNNNNNNNCNCNCNNNCCCNCCCNCCCNNNCNCNC

    dot = 1 unit of time
    dash = 3 units of time
    inter-dot/dash silence = 1 unit of time
    inter-letter silence = 3 units of time
    inter-word silence = 7 units of time

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  58. Good reasons by davidwr · · Score: 1

    There are no good reason to implement Telex/telegraph on fiber

    Just encapsulate it in another protocol that does do well over fiber and call it a day.

    As for "good reasons" to even have such protocols, the hobbyist, novelty, and for the time being in certain countries, legal markets are the only ones I can think of. As a text-message-delivery protocol to use when fiber is available, there are so many better ones to choose from.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  59. In post-Soviet Russia by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Telegram posts you???

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  60. In this case, yes by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Does the fact that it is binary confer digital status automatically?

    In this case, yes.

    I assume you are talking about Morse code, which consists of "current off" and "current on" states grouped into dits ("dot"), dahs ("dashes," 3 times the length of a dit), inter-dit/dah spacing (period of no current, same length as a dit), inter-"letter" spacing (3 times the length of a dit), and inter-word spacing (7 times the length of a dit).

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:In this case, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was and thanks. I appreciate the help/information. Slashdot has put me in the penalty box - I got a huge amount of replies and replied to them all which totaled 50 posts which appears to be the limit. They gave me a yellow box of doom, an email address to plead my case, and told me to go outside. *chuckles*

      So, yeah, this is KGIII replying as AC. I appreciate the information, I guess I've stated the reasons I was convinced otherwise (and thanked people) enough in other posts. I'm still not going outside though, they can't make me and it is raining.

  61. You must not be in the United States by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Here they typically call you on the phone.

    Note to Americans who get calls from Visa claiming fraud: Tell them "Who are you and how can I call you back [write down information], OK, thanks, I'll call my bank right now" then hang up.

    Oh, and call your bank, since it might be legit.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  62. Re:Nope ... But Wait! There's Still Hope! by Anonomoose+Coward · · Score: 1

    Why this negativity, the already accepted demise for Indian Telegraph ? Didn't they predict the same fate for radio, the Movies and TV ? And those are still around and alive. No, I have an IMMEDIATE solution to this: PORN over the telegraph. Anticipated to have the same potential market share that the Internet already has. India has a population already over a BILLION, so this is a vast untapped market. A sure fire first demonstration of this would be porn for the blind, I think someone creative out there could come up w/ some kinda Open Source Braille Killer-App. Crowd-sourced, of course.

  63. Re:Nope ... But Wait! There's Still Hope! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there would be some kind of market for it............

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  64. Stop. Stop! by Meski · · Score: 1

    No, don't stop, stop.

  65. Re:dots and dashes = ones and zeroes = binary = di by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry dude, You are wrong. Telegraph consist of dots, dashes and blanks so it can't be binary... since the blanks are needed to carry information you can't call it binary.

  66. Luxury! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    [Yorkshire accent] Well, it were just a trail where rats had flattened the scrubby little weeds slightly. But it was a road to us. [/Ya]

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Luxury! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      [YA]Rats? Thee were lucky to 'ave rats. We 'ad ter mek do wi' path beaten dahn bah t'ants. Ah used ter dream o' rats. Still do.
      Onna stick![/YA]

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  67. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If the last one says "do the needful", how will I be able to revert the same if I have one doubt?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  68. typically 0.35 - 0.65 is undefined for digital by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Read some specs. No, or almost no, digital protocols allow signal levels between 0.4 and 0.6. That is considered "too close to call" because digital normally doesn't permit something that islikely to be erroneous. Slashdot grammar proves that our analog wetware has no problem deciphering error filled signals.