Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Integrating Xbox One Advertising With Kinect To Profile Users For Ads

MojoKid writes "When Microsoft reversed its Xbox One DRM policies a few weeks back, there was momentary hope that the company has listened to its customers and understood the features they were asking for. Granted, this was brief. However, with Mattrick gone, there was some hope that maybe the company would reintroduce plans like Family Sharing and put the console back on track. Apparently not. Microsoft's big new feature with Kinect? Advertising. Microsoft plans to use Kinect to make advertisements even more engaging than their current counterparts. In the future, Kinect may offer you a 'Choose Your Own Adventure' style narrative in which you speak commands or give orders to an ad as it's playing to change the final outcome. The other way Microsoft wants to use Kinect is to monitor what's going on in the living room to serve you group-appropriate content, rather than resorting to the plain old method of bombarding you with non-interactive advertising for things you don't care about. Microsoft will likely learn that telling gamers that the Xbox One is an ad-centric experience and attempting to spin it like a positive doesn't actually work."

300 comments

  1. This is... by bigfinger76 · · Score: 0

    Sweet!

    1. Re:This is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd be okay with this on the condition that the kinect interprets the middle finger as a "skip ad" gesture

    2. Re:This is... by Camael · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I know of some people who would buy the Kinect if that was a feature.

    3. Re:This is... by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Knowing how the kinect works with digit interpretation now, it would probably just be mistaken for the "buy one" gesture.

      What?!? It's not a bug, it's a feature!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:This is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd be OK with it if Microsoft was giving them away. Charging advertisers to put ads in front of users and then making users pay for the Xbox so that they can be pummelled with ads seems, somehow, really fucking greedy.

    5. Re:This is... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 0

      Charging advertisers to put ads in front of users and then making users pay for the Xbox so that they can be pummelled with ads seems, somehow, really fucking greedy.

      Spot on. Has Microsoft actually succeeded in selling one of these machines yet? To anyone with an IQ greater than 30?

      The claim to make ads "more engaging" seems pretty specious if it is actually impossible for the user to "disengage" from them.

    6. Re:This is... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Is that ironic?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:This is... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Hell I still haven't figured out how they were able to pull off the scam that is XBL, so give MSFT credit as they managed to make piles of money convincing people they should have to pay a monthly fee just to play the games they already paid for online while everybody else has always had online MP free.

      And sadly while I think its a nasty DRM box I have a feeling the Xbone is gonna be a runaway smash simply because MSFT opened up one of their money trucks and emptied it on the front lawn of the NFL and there are a LOT of guys in the USA that would buy a system that had a Goatse from Ballmer himself on the cover if it had NFL exclusives. hell I know a guy that has his CC on file with gamestop just so that EVERY NFL or NASCAR release for his console and handheld is delivered to his door on the day of release, so no matter how nasty MSFT gets he'll buy the Xbone on launch. Sadly he is far from alone, i have noticed a LOT of overlap between the X360 demographic and the frat boy "hey brah" crowd so while it may not beat the PS4 it should make MSFT a killing.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:This is... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Earth. This is how our overlords do things.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Great by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slimfast and match.com is gonna be appearing on most I bet.

    And before anyone claims Sony doesn't do this already, you've already got little promotional boxes and ads after you've booted up and automatically logged into your PSN on your PS3.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is trying to push ads as the core feature though.

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By 'your PSN', do you mean the PSN shop? That's really disingenuous, if so, and it's perfectly understandable to have advertisements for new releases/deals/special promotions/what have you on a shop page. Otherwise, unless they've changed it fairly recently, the only ads on the XMB is a scrolling marquee on the upper right corner, which can be turned off IIRC. Either way, this is in no way close to comparable to what MS has been doing, and what the article claims they plan to do.

    3. Re:Great by tibman · · Score: 2

      hmmm, i have no idea what you're talking about. When i power mine on it goes to the login screen. Selecting an account brings you to the main menu. I usually go left 3 and down 1 to Netflix. There is no screen of ads to be seen.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own a PS3 and have never noticed that before.

    5. Re:Great by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The ads on my PS3 NEVER played audio like the ones on 360 does. FURTHER, the only ads are from Sony themselves for GAMES. Xbox tried selling me old spice and red bull with ads that would blare if you happened to navigate over the element.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Great by _xeno_ · · Score: 0

      Just for you, I'll go check.

      Yep. You're moving off the ad screen too fast for it to load. (Getting to Netflix from start on mine involves 3 left and 1 down.) If you wait, the screen you're moving off of that you're shown by default will show you nine ads at a time if you sit on that icon. Not sure how many it scrolls through, but there are more than the nine that fit on the screen at once.

      Go ahead and try it.

      For comparison's sake, after starting up the Xbox 360, you're treated to a mere six. Not amazingly better, but still - fewer than on the PS3!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm.... do you actually own a PS3?

    8. Re:Great by jakimfett · · Score: 1

      Nope. Not if you disable it in the options.

      --
      Bits of code, random ramblings: jakimfett.com
    9. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? When I boot up my PS3 it starts in the XMB highlighting either the disc in the drive or whichever downloaded game is at the top of the list. Aside from the scrolling text under your PSN details in the top-right corner there aren't any ads/promotions until you hover over the Store icon, then it throws a few things up to the right. Also note that no where on the XMB are there ANY non-Sony ads, everything is a game/movie/etc, not Slim Jims or whatever.

    10. Re:Great by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Really? Well I don't own a PS3, though I did use my sisters for the 3 months I was house sitting for her. And I didn't see ads once, that was 6 mo ago. So perhaps things have changed.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:Great by EvilIdler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some of these "ads" on the PS3 are direct links to my most recently played games.

    12. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Match.com. Yep, from the hours of Microsoft's Kinect watching me masturbate... alone... and crying... Damn you XBOX (B)ONE(R)!

    13. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My PS3 doesn't show any ads until I move to the store.

    14. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you turn on your PS3, it will take you straight to a page of ads. Now, granted, you can navigate away from that immediately, but still: every time you start the PS3, you'll get bombarded with a screen full of ads. In fact, you're actually shown more ads immediately after turning on the PS3 than you are after starting the current 360.

      The ads only show if you have "Show me whats new" or whatever the option is called set to "On" and even then the first line you get is your three most recently played games with three actual ads above that main line and three below which adds up to six, same as the 360

    15. Re:Great by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      When you turn on your PS3, it will take you straight to a page of ads. Now, granted, you can navigate away from that immediately, but still: every time you start the PS3, you'll get bombarded with a screen full of ads. In fact, you're actually shown more ads immediately after turning on the PS3 than you are after starting the current 360.

      I've never gotten AD's from the PS3 except those scrolling in the upper right which are of new games or events.

      Playing Ratchet and Clank (only PS3 game in years) I had nothing blocked, I'd always start at the game selection where I'd start playing,
      the scrolling I noticed just welcomed me to PSN. During the game nothing and nothing as near obnoxious as your
      mentioning. I figure you might of sign-up for much more stuff than I.

      Now I use my PS3 for NetFlix; turning it on I enter my account start at games left one, hit NetFlix - I'm welcomed to PSN then
      text ads start scrolling in the upper right about new games - that the extent of my ads

      ----

      But seeing as I use the PS3 for NetFlix exclusively I've put Playstation.net on my routers "blocked sites"
      so I don't log in anymore, top right complains about DLNA error, but Netflix works better.

      With nothing blocked I always have to select captions and sound options. With Playstation.net blocked, I'm asked to log in, it
      fails, I'm shown a list to goto for possible reasons of the failure, I skip that and NetFlix starts and my captions are
      always on, much nicer with Playstation.net blocked.

      As a side note: I would never buy an Xbox now it's pretty much in stone. I don't like the controllers they are too large for me, PS controllers are
      what I like as they fit my hands better.

    16. Re:Great by _xeno_ · · Score: 0

      The default - which some update forced on everyone - is to start with at the PlayStation Store, so you get ads as soon as your PSN account is logged in. Just like the OP said. If there's an option to change it other than "never update" I've never found it, so it's well hidden.

      Every ad on the Xbox 360 when I went to check was gaming-related, I'm not sure what your Slim Jims comment is about.

      The point stands: Sony is doing the "ad on a console you paid for" thing just like Microsoft is. Who knows if the PS4 will be worse than the PS3, since there are next to no details about the PS4 OS yet.

      But it's Sony. Whatever they give you at launch, you can be sure they'll be more than happy to take away with a mandatory patch down the line. Kind of like how PSN Plus will be required for online access on the PS4, something no one seems to care about. ("But you get free games with it!" Well, sure, you do now, but what about later when Sony decides to removes that feature? You can't say they wouldn't do that - they've proven they're perfectly happy to remove features people paid for and are using.)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    17. Re:Great by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      And before anyone claims Sony doesn't do this already, you've already got little promotional boxes and ads after you've booted up and automatically logged into your PSN on your PS3.

      I didn't even know there were ads on the PS3, but after some googling it would seem that in some cases there are. I've never seen that myself, though.

    18. Re: Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never seen ads on my ps3 ever, if it was like the 360 it would be going in the bin. I hate ads.

    19. Re:Great by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      The default - which some update forced on everyone - is to start with at the PlayStation Store, so you get ads as soon as your PSN account is logged in.

      On my PS3 (which is up-to-date on firmware etc.), there is no such page of ads and there never has been. When the PS3 is powered up, it automatically logs me in to PSN. Then it does nothing - just waits at the XMB forever (or until it goes into screensaver mode). Occasionally, just after booting, it may suggest that there should be a firmware update. Occasionally, on starting a previously downloaded title, it may suggest that the title be updated.

      There is no "page full of ads", so either you're trolling or you have set some really weird startup default. It is certainly not a default which was "forced on everyone" as you erroneously claim.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    20. Re:Great by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Now I'm curious too, never heard of these ads showing up.

      If I leave it on the default the art for the game will show up in the background; but that's hardly an ad.

    21. Re:Great by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      The default - which some update forced on everyone - is to start with at the PlayStation Store,

      No, you start at "What's New". This generally contains shortcuts to the Store, yes, along with shortcuts to your most recently played games.

    22. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      group-appropriate content

      - Mommy, mommy, the console is full of gay escort service ads! My birthday is ruined and my friends are all mocking me.
      - Looks like daddy have some explaining to do once he comes home.

    23. Re:Great by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Glad I don't log in to my PS3. It doesn't even have the passcode to my wireless router.

    24. Re:Great by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit, I never see a "page of ads" when I turn on my PS3. It's sitting at the "Play %Disc in machine%" prompt....

    25. Re:Great by cjjjer · · Score: 0, Troll

      Which is Google's core business (ads); so it makes it different how? Just because it's Microsoft?

    26. Re:Great by _xeno_ · · Score: 0

      This generally contains shortcuts to the Store

      Oh, I see, they're "not ads," they're just "little pictures that are links to products that are for sale in the PlayStation Store."

      Which are totally and completely a unique and distinct concept from ads.

      No, sorry, those are ads, and they are what's shown by default when you start up a PS3 with the latest firmware that's connected to PSN. If you don't have a PSN account I guess it might work differently, but it most certainly happens by default if you do.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    27. Re:Great by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      I remember the "What's New?" thing you're talking about. But I have a PSN account. PSN+, in fact (just recently upgraded) and I haven't seen it in like a year, despite constantly updating. Just fiddle around in the settings and you can get it to start anywhere, I believe.

      And for the record, I do believe there is a difference between a tiny ad within an icon that links to a store built into the system and actually displaying full video ads.

    28. Re:Great by _xeno_ · · Score: 0

      And for the record, I do believe there is a difference between a tiny ad within an icon that links to a store built into the system and actually displaying full video ads.

      A difference, sure. But the bottom line is, no matter how many Sony fanboys want to claim otherwise, if you take a new PS3 and let it go online, you will be shown ads when the system starts. You may find them "less intrusive" than those on the Xbox 360, but they're there and they're shown by default. I certainly never opted in to them, and they appear now when I start my PS3. Pretty sure it was an update around the time that they removed OtherOS that added them.

      No matter what the anti-Microsoft crowd would like to pretend, yes, Sony does the same thing with their console.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    29. Re:Great by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      However, I don't mind Sony doing it so much since I can play online there for free. It's also less intrusive than Xbox. Microsoft, on the other hand, charges $60 a year for their services and spams the shit out of the home screen with ads.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    30. Re:Great by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Ads for Bing, mostly.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    31. Re:Great by GNious · · Score: 2

      Sony might "do this already", but difference between my PS3 and my XBox360 is that I loathe how 90% of the stuff on the screen of my XBox360 (upon logging in) are various ads...

    32. Re:Great by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You mean "what's new" which shows the last 3 games you played, and 3 panels above and below that with promotional tiles. You can set it so that the PS3's XMB doesn't go to it after boot.

      System Settings> Display [What's New]

      Turn it to off. That setting only applies if you have your PS3 connected to the Internet, if you don't it can't show it. Either way you have the option of not automatically showing it, though I find it useful to check for new releases on PSN.

    33. Re:Great by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      System Settings> Display [What's New]

      Set it to off and the PS3 won't show it at boot, though you can still use it manually if you want to see some of what's new on PSN.

    34. Re:Great by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      However, I don't mind Sony doing it so much since I can play online there for free. It's also less intrusive than Xbox. Microsoft, on the other hand, charges $60 a year for their services and spams the shit out of the home screen with ads.

      PS4 requires PS+ to play online. Sony has already stated this. PS3 will however retain ability to play for free online.

      You mean "what's new" which shows the last 3 games you played, and 3 panels above and below that with promotional tiles. You can set it so that the PS3's XMB doesn't go to it after boot.

      System Settings> Display [What's New]

      Turn it to off. That setting only applies if you have your PS3 connected to the Internet, if you don't it can't show it. Either way you have the option of not automatically showing it, though I find it useful to check for new releases on PSN.

      That doesn't remove that ticker that shows up below the login details that scrolls ads. I don't know why, but I find that way more annoying that how Microsoft does it (though that advertising tile comes close - the one that says "advertising" on it). The other stuff seems fairly static and somewhat relevant and interesting.

      That said, I think the PS4 will have to include it as well - an advertising API because games will demand it for in-game ads. (Which are here now, no matter what the platform)

    35. Re:Great by man_the_king · · Score: 1

      no matter how many Sony fanboys want to claim otherwise, if you take a new PS3 and let it go online, you will be shown ads when the system starts. You may find them "less intrusive" than those on the Xbox 360, but they're there and they're shown by default. I certainly never opted in to them, and they appear now when I start my PS3. Pretty sure it was an update around the time that they removed OtherOS that added them.

      No matter what the anti-Microsoft crowd would like to pretend, yes, Sony does the same thing with their console.

      WRONG - you can set those "ads", miniscule as they are, to off. Look at this post from CronoCloud. Unless you are being sneaky in saying "a new PS3", which is what a Sony-hater or a Microsoft fanboy (and sometimes - like in your case - they happen to be the same thing) would say :- Whoa! you happened to see an ad ONE TIME before you disabled it in Settings. Same as MS. Yeah right!

  3. Blink blink by future+assassin · · Score: 0

    blink blink

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  4. Evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Will not buy.

    1. Re:Evil. by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Will not buy.

      Neither will I.

      If there are advertisements, then the hardware and games should be free. If the user is paying for the hardware and games, there should be no advertisements.

      I have this distant hope that gamers will learn the lesson taught to us by cable TV. Originally cable TV was ad-free on the basis that you were paying a fee for it. Then ads were introduced and for some reason, viewers tolerated it. They grabbed their ankles and took it just like they typically do, so cable TV ads became firmly entrenched.

      Gamers, the same thing will happen to you if you put up with this. There can be no doubt about it.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardware and games should not be free. Not nearly enough revenue would come through to pay for the entire hardware manufacturing and software development industry and you know it. I don't get why they "should" be free... is this a moral argument??? Should newspapers and magazines be free since the have printed ads? How about films in the theater since they play advertisements before hand?

      Televisions to watch OTA ads aren't free. Cable TV and it's related hardware isn't free and the market accepts it. So whatever they can do, they will do if the market is OK with it.

    3. Re:Evil. by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      Will not buy.

      Neither will I.

      I have this distant hope that gamers will learn the lesson taught to us by cable TV. Originally cable TV was ad-free on the basis that you were paying a fee for it. Then ads were introduced and for some reason, viewers tolerated it. They grabbed their ankles and took it just like they typically do, so cable TV ads became firmly entrenched.

      That's why I limit myself to cable TV packages that only have the local OTA stations (digital reception sucks). I'm not going to pay the cable carrier to show me ads on channels supposedly funded by cable fees, especially when ads are slowly taking up more time (not to mention full-length "infomercials").

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    4. Re:Evil. by SJHiIlman · · Score: 4, Informative

      His point was that you shouldn't pay for this garbage and then be presented with ads; that's absurd.

      So whatever they can do, they will do if the market is OK with it.

      And since most people seem to be morons, they'll end up doing pretty much everything.

    5. Re:Evil. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      The ads are a feature. Based on what the Kinect sees when you forget to turn it to the wall it will know whether to offer you medical services, viagra, penis enhancement pills, cheetos and hot pockets or flavored lube.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was. You're a moron.

    7. Re:Evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern gaming is in a worse shape then cable TV already.

    8. Re:Evil. by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much you can say the market accepts it for cable. More and more people are cutting the cord

    9. Re:Evil. by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      The ads are a feature. Based on what the Kinect sees when you forget to turn it to the wall it will know whether to offer you medical services, viagra, penis enhancement pills, cheetos and hot pockets or flavored lube.

      Note to self...hot pockets and cheetos flavored lube!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    10. Re:Evil. by DaHat · · Score: 1

      When? Where?

    11. Re:Evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cable was invented as a way to get OTA broadcasts to people who weren't in range of many stations or couldn't put up antennas, like in apartments. The only ad-free cable TV came along later, as channels like HBO that you had to pay extra for and maybe some of the niche channels, which all play the same things now.

    12. Re:Evil. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      If there are advertisements, then the hardware and games should be free. If the user is paying for the hardware and games, there should be no advertisements.

      Yeah, every other contentious subject in the world is a black-and-white case consisting only of one extreme versus another, so why should this be any different, right? Oh, wait...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    13. Re:Evil. by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Netflix. That is my solution. I have been using hulu, and i'm almost at the point of throwing it out, but i only watch free stuff. So, ads and free. I may watch old things, and have no idea what tv exists, but I always have something to watch when I want, and don't have ads on netflix. I dought I will ever watch there entire library.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    14. Re:Evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the topic of adblockers comes up. people clammer that they only want to block annoying ads and that they would be prefer to get ads tailored to them or ads for things they care about. Now Microsoft is giving people that, and you bitch about having ads. You're going to have ads no matter what. Might as well get ads for shit you might actually like or use instead of random shit you don't care about.

    15. Re:Evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Originally cable TV was ad-free"

      This was never true, just ask Ted Turner.

  5. Wii U... by eagee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, I actually want the new xbox less than I want a Wii U now...

    1. Re:Wii U... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Not gonna happen, not even 5 years down the road when M$ drops the price to a pittance to try and move them...

      M$ would have to get a way from FPS and similar shooters and have some really good RPG exclusives to have even a remote chance.

  6. It is better than buying used games by kriston · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    From a recent pastebin post allegedly from a Microsoft person, the DRM scheme appears to be actually better for consumers. How often are people screwed by selling their used games for pennies on the dollar? The XBOX One scheme actually does two things: it provides consumer protection in the used game market by elevating prices and it appears to also provide minimal (and nominal) revenue for publishers when a game is resold.

    This model seems to work on Steam and TODAY nobody is bad-mouthing Steam after over a decade of DRM-encumbered operation.

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:It is better than buying used games by SJHiIlman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and TODAY nobody is bad-mouthing Steam after over a decade of DRM-encumbered operation.

      I am. Plenty of other people still do. So, you're wrong.

    2. Re:It is better than buying used games by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      You're free to sell your games for however much you want them. Hint: There's more than just Gamestop.

      Steam is actually pretty crappy, but its better than some DRM schemes that publishers have come up with since you can't just swap disks like you've always been able to with console games.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re: It is better than buying used games by s.petry · · Score: 4, Informative

      People were not complaining about selling games with the DRM an, they were complaining about not being able to play them.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This model seems to work on Steam and TODAY nobody is bad-mouthing Steam after over a decade of DRM-encumbered operation.

      Steam is not the sole, take-it-or-leave-it offering on PC. Don't like Steam? Use GoG, or GMG, or D2D, or Origin (ugh), or Amazon, or don't use a digital distribution system at all. Don't like Xbone's digital shop? Too damn bad.

    5. Re:It is better than buying used games by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Informative

      > How often are people screwed by selling their used games for pennies on the dollar?

      Umm its a used item, its not gold or an investment. I want to buy a used game as cheap as I can get it, that's all that matters. I think you're confused on the used marker thingy, its about buying second hand items "cheap" not selling them for 90% of the retail sticker price.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    6. Re:It is better than buying used games by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am not an avid gamer, but I do occasionally play games. I will never drop $60 on a new game, and I won't go to Gamestop to spend $50 on a used one. What I will do, however is occasionally troll garage sales, and Amazon for interesting looking games. I bought the Force Unleashed I and II for $8 total a few weeks ago. If Microsoft's new system were in place, I never could have done that.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    7. Re:It is better than buying used games by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      Unless MS was planning on having 10€ sales with DRM that is easy to crack and would be playable 10 years in the future, it's very different.

    8. Re:It is better than buying used games by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      ...it provides consumer protection... by elevating prices...

      Reality is so much freakier than drugs...

      Man, what is in this shit, man?

      Mostly Maui Waui man, but it's got some Labrador in it.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the Wikipedia article regarding Steam (my emphasis):

      "Steam collects and reports anonymous metrics of its usage, stability, and performance.[53] With the exception of Valve's hardware survey,[54] most collection occurs without notifying the user or offering an opt-out. Some of these metrics are available publicly, such as what games are being played or statistics on player progress in certain games.[55] Valve has also used information from these statistics to justify implementing new features in Steam, such as the addition of a defragmentation option for game caches.[56] Valve announced on July 15, 2010 that in conjunction with collecting hardware information in Steam's opt-in hardware surveys, they would begin collecting a list of the user's installed software as well.[57]"

      I don't bad-mouth Steam/Valve--I simply don't do business with them. Never have, never will. I suspect I am not alone in that regard.

    10. Re: It is better than buying used games by causality · · Score: 2

      People were not complaining about selling games with the DRM an, they were complaining about not being able to play them.

      That's exactly what DRM is designed to do. By putting up with it, you are subsidising your own restrictions.

      Anything else amounts to expecting the gaming corporations to act against their own profit motives. If they can tempt you into accepting unreasonable restrictions with the latest shiny, they will. If they can either kill off or control the used games markets, they will. These things make them more money. It's just that simple.

      Anyone who purchases DRM'ed titles and complains about this needs to take a long look into the mirror. Expecting goodwill from these corporations is madness. They view you in much the same way that coal companies view the mines. You're a resource to be tapped. What's right and wrong to these sociopaths is whatever you'll bend over and take. I mean, this should be easy: we are talking about gaming systems here, not food and water. The slightest discipline means you prevail and *they* bend over and take it because their alternative is going out of business.

      The situation is downright pitiful. I think the executives see it this way as well, which is why they feel completely justified in their exploitation. They feel completely justified taking advantage because it's what so many people want (or don't care about) and are willing to pay for.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    11. Re:It is better than buying used games by meerling · · Score: 2

      Do you know anywhere in the US where you can rent as well as sell/buy used PC games? Neither do I. I guess Steams lack of those features is rather a moot point, and there are tons of people whining about Steam.

      If you're curious, my state passed a law over a decade ago that totally killed PC software rentals and used sales. :(

      By the way, the new 'features' of xbox v3 has me totally committed to buying something else, probably a ps4.

    12. Re:It is better than buying used games by citizenr · · Score: 5, Informative

      This model seems to work on Steam and TODAY nobody is bad-mouthing Steam after over a decade of DRM-encumbered operation.

      Nobody in US where consumer protection means protecting corporations from users. Germany is suing Valve over steam no resale policy, they did it after landmark case versus Oracle that reinforced right to resale software..

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    13. Re:It is better than buying used games by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I don't know how you can compare the two. One sells pretty new games unbelievably cheap, requires a connection once a month, and will play games on any system you have as long as the game supports it (even if it is your tenth machine and it is fifteen years later).

      Also, the idea that it somehow helps the used market is ridiculous. It helps the new market. It helps Microsoft control the entire ball of wax. For example, remember when things moved to digital and all the publishers and developers reduced the price from $60 to $30?... oh, right -- they didn't.

    14. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the DRM scheme appears to be actually better for consumers. How often are people screwed by selling their used games for pennies on the dollar?

      What the blueberry fuck? (for either Xbone or Steam)

      I've never been screwed by selling a used game for pennies on the dollar because I don't sell my used games. If it was good enough for me to want to replay, I keep it on a shelf along with other works of literature. (and on disk with digital copies of pretty much those same works of literature.)

      If it wasn't good enough to replay, I uninstall it and give the install media to a friend who's expressed interest, and failing that, just leave it on the bookshelf at my office, and either way, someone else gets to play it.

      First sale doctrine. Learn it, love it, live it.

    15. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy AAA titles on steam for five bucks. At those prices, I am totally ok with the DRM.

      At $60 for new games and $30 for that game used, no matter how old it is, I will not tolerate DRM. And seeing as how the primary purpose of this DRM is to keep the price artificially inflated to those levels, I have even more reason to reject it.

      Anyway, being watched like that is creepy.

    16. Re:It is better than buying used games by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not Valve. Lets not pretend they are even close to the same league of companies.

      --
      Good-bye
    17. Re:It is better than buying used games by SJHiIlman · · Score: 0

      I buy AAA titles on steam for five bucks. At those prices, I am totally ok with the DRM.

      You certainly shouldn't be.

    18. Re:It is better than buying used games by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      From a recent pastebin post allegedly from a Microsoft person, the DRM scheme appears to be actually better for consumers.

      Better compared to what? Because last I checked, the default of no DRM is superior to any other sort of scheme.

      How often are people screwed by selling their used games for pennies on the dollar?

      One, if people are selling a luxury item at pennies on the dollar, it's a good bet that they're getting sufficient value at even pennies on the dollar to make it worthwhile. Two, odds are good your complaint is directed more at the ratio of sold used game prices vs new game prices, which has a lot to do with the fact that Nintendo, MS, and Sony games are so damn expensive even on the cheap side--excluding the digital download games (wow, just like Steam with all the non-resellable aspects*). Three, the rest of your complaint is directed at middlemen like Gamestop, Amazon, etc who buy low and sell high while using aspects of being the market maker to get a larger cut of the buy/sell price (just like HFT), but that speaks more to the point that if MS gave a damn they'd set up exchanges to facilitate sales without taking those huge cuts.

      The XBOX One scheme actually does two things: it provides consumer protection in the used game market by elevating prices and it appears to also provide minimal (and nominal) revenue for publishers when a game is resold.

      Um.."consumer protection ... by elevating prices"? Maybe in the reduces-the-degree-of-depreciation sense. But video games aren't cars and it's quite crazy to presume there won't be substantial depreciation in a used game. Besides, as mentioned above, to actually work on "consumer protection" MS would setup used game exchanges to facilitate safer used game sales or similar things. And as for providing "nominal revenue for publishers"...uh...why should the publishers (or developers) be getting any money? Because MS said so?

      This model seems to work on Steam and TODAY nobody is bad-mouthing Steam after over a decade of DRM-encumbered operation.

      Um, plenty of people bad-mouth Steam. I bad-mouth Steam. Steam Client for Linux is a crash-prone mess, at least for me. Even if it weren't crash-prone, having to start up a separate program to play a game is ridiculous. Having it constantly running to avoid that is ridiculous. Having it be a nanny and check to be really super-sure the 100th time that, yea, I really did buy the game and it's okay for me to play it, is ridiculous. The fact that so many games are Windows focused and trying to fiddle with them to get them to work under a [beta] Linux executable (if even available), wine (using Windows Steam Client, of course), or Virtualbox (with questionable 3D support) is hampered by the Steam mindset that the above are three different machines and hence require three separate 9GB d/ls just to see which works best is ridiculous--and even if I can do a backup/restore from one "machine" to the other, that's only marginally less ridiculous.

      But, yea, keep singing to your choir.

      *Note, I don't say this is as a great champion of the non-resellability of Steam. But then it's funny how you think it's better for consumers if prices raise [on used games] ignoring the space without used games has lower prices. In any case, the obvious risk to any of the above schemes are issues of monopolistic prices due to control by a distributor. Of course, the beauty to that is precisely the multi-porting of games and the competition of the various platforms, though that leaves the user with the serious disadvantage of having to buy several platforms to buy different games on different platforms to get the best price. And, of course, one of those platforms is the used game part on the PC outside of Steam, so odds are good at least that MS will at worst hurt itself and boost PC sales of games. :/

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    19. Re:It is better than buying used games by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Either you allow second market sales, or you provide sales on the level of Steam (>=75% off). Steam caught on because of price, convenience is a secondary concern. Microsoft wanted to double dip with restrictions on second hand and no major sales (at least, they've never mentioned any of it, and you can bet they would've if they'd planned it to shield themselves from the backlash).

    20. Re:It is better than buying used games by Comen · · Score: 1

      I am not sure why they can not do both, the issue I had with the DRM was that is was not possible to play a game if your internet was down for more than 24 hours, and I use my console on vacation allot where there is no internet. So why did they not let you choose if you want to use DRM you have to have the internet up every 24 hours, if your internet is down, stick the disk in the system to play the game just like you always have and it works while the disk is in.
      I must be missing something.

    21. Re: It is better than buying used games by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Anything else amounts to expecting the gaming corporations to act against their own profit motives. If they can tempt you into accepting unreasonable restrictions with the latest shiny, they will. If they can either kill off or control the used games markets, they will. These things make them more money. It's just that simple.

      Anyone who purchases DRM'ed titles and complains about this needs to take a long look into the mirror.

      There are two separate issues, you are not pointing at the same thing I am.

      Assume I purchase a game and the media has DRM, like a CD-Key. When I upgrade my device, especially to the same manufacture/design/model in an upgraded version there is an expectation that I can play that game on the new device. It's no different than upgrading my PC and expecting my old stuff works.

      In that respect, and with that type of DRM most people have no issues with DRM. It should also be understood that upgrades should only be expected to go so far in time (backward compatibility after a 2nd upgrade would not really be a fair expectation). We can rip CD/DVD copies to maintain the original, and maintain the key for use.

      What Microsoft announced in their DRM initially was that old media would not be playable because it did not fit in their DRM model (in addition to numerous other reasons). Public reaction to Sony discussing it and abandoning the idea with PS3 should have given MS a hint, but it didn't for a very long time. I'm still curious to see if they allow old media to play with the new designs. I honestly have not followed very closely, don't own an Xbox, and try to boycott Microsoft at every possible position.

      The person I replied too made it seem like the issues were just because people wanted to pirate shit. That position is wrong, and while I perhaps didn't do the best at explaining "why" it's wrong that was the intent of my post.

      Now to your point, it seems like you wish for no DRM at all, including keys to unlock media. Personally I have much less issue with that than I do with Movies forcing me to watch previews every time I put in a movie. Old style DRM was extremely minimal with intrusion, and offered some protection to creators. Whether it was Unix hostid's or CD keys it worked for the most part (and still does with the most expensive software like CAD and Analysis).

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    22. Re: It is better than buying used games by symbolset · · Score: 1

      A lot of people give their lame games away. When you pay $60 for a lame game that is what a good friend does: give it to a friend who is in danger of making the same mistake to try. So the paid for copies circulate until they find somebody who likes it. The more lame a game is, the faster it circulates and the more people discover they should not waste their money on this lame game. That is the evolution that preventing game trading is about. The game maker thinks that is lost revenue. More people would buy lame games if they didn't know the game was lame. That is money they could have got for their lame game that nobody wants who has tried it. For some reason makers of lame games think this is stealing money they should have got and want technology to prevent it. Makers of lame movies and songs have the same point of view. They really don't understand why buyers of games, movies and songs don't want to help them with this goal.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    23. Re: It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually NOT true. The game developers have already received their money when the retailers purchased the games at wholesale. The act of selling a video game in stores is simply the retailers trying to recoup their investment. Everyone thinks that by not buying a video game they are hurting the developers but in reality they are hurting the retailers, i.e. Best Buy, Wal-Mart, Gamestop. The companies who took a gamble and stocked their shelves with a product that may turn out to be huge or a big flop. The retailers in turn will either say "This title sold awesome let's buy the next title this companies releases in bulk" or say "this company's game sold crappy for us so maybe we wont stock their next title". And that is how the game developers lose money. Not because consumers don't buy their games but because stores refuse to stock them.

    24. Re:It is better than buying used games by asmkm22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have no problem with Steam. They actually seem to realize that digital delivery means the customer can save money. When I'm buying fairly recent games for 60% off or whatever, I don't really care if I can't resell them. Steam makes purchasing and playing games pretty cheap and easy, so I like it.

      Origin, is another story. Steam works precisely because it's publisher-agnostic. Origin will never gain that momentum because EA is just using it as a way to increase profits by cutting out the costs of physical distribution, without passing any savings to the customer.

    25. Re:It is better than buying used games by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, at least last time I checked there wasn't a "Steam Only" game, aside of maybe some of Valve's own. And even there I'm fairly certain you can get a boxed version somehow that you needn't tie to some Steam account. And if everything fails and you want to resell your games, there's always the option to create an account for that game you plan to resell only.

      I doubt I have that much of a choice with XB1 games.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you understand that by buying those, you were stealing food from the table of the poor developer of the force unleashed? what of his little baby who can't afford a rusk stick :c

    27. Re:It is better than buying used games by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why not? I can very well agree with it.

      DRM devalues a product. It does take away some rights I usually enjoy when I buy something, like being able to resell it, being able to use it whenever and however I want to and so on. One can agree with this or one cannot, but the very least I would expect when I am supposed to put up with additional hardships and less usability is a reduction in price. And that's exactly what he is talking about.

      When you reduce the value of a product and at the same time reduce its price, there isn't really much to complain about. At least as long as the other option remains available. If anything, it's free market at its finest. You have premium quality at premium price, and you have the el-cheapo, Chinese knockoff in the penny market, pick and choose, customer!

      I also don't think anyone would have a problem with heavy ads if it was an option. Either pay premium for ad-free content or accept ads and pay a discount. If anything, people would rejoice and love the increased choice they get, not unlike you get with some other software today (notably in the security department, which is a bit ... odd to say the least, but I ramble).

      What I do have a problem with is mixing them. Loading a product with crippling DRM, selling it at a premium price and not offering me the option to choose something different. Making me pay premium AND bombarding me with ads. THAT is the problem we're talking about here because that is what is happening with games today. Prices stay at 60 bucks or even rise past it while at the same time the product gets artificially devalued by invasive DRM, and now we're probably getting the ridiculous "watch a truckload of ads before you can use the product" we already loved so much with movies on DVD.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:It is better than buying used games by SJHiIlman · · Score: 1

      Why not? I can very well agree with it.

      Well, I can't. I'm fundamentally opposed to DRM, so even if someone were to offer me a DRM-infested game at a cheap price, I would not buy it.

    29. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't like that they weren't telling us, they are doing it to make the experience better.

    30. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How do you go about trolling garage sales?

      Maybe you turn up and start shouting "All this stuff is junk!"

    31. Re:It is better than buying used games by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      You only forget to mention who "consumers" are. They are companies that sell ads and game publishers.

      As for the people who are typically referred to as "customers" by the rest of us, your type of shill usually refers to them as "product".

      P.S. There are plenty of us who badmouth steam over DRM.

    32. Re:It is better than buying used games by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Then it will suck on the teats of the mommy. According to doctors that is healthier. So clearly, we're doing a public service by buying used games!

    33. Re:It is better than buying used games by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's perfectly fine and acceptable. But I hope we can agree that people should have the choice between paying more and having more rights to the content, or paying less and being subject to various limitations.

      Much like the choice between paying for a movie and watching it ad-free or accepting ads and watching it for free.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    34. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confused about what he's talking about.

      For pennies to the dollar I'd presume he's talking about selling the games back to places like gamestop, etc who will then turn around and sell it for almost the same price as new. Meaning -you- don't get it any cheaper at all.

      It's not about it being valuable. But if the store you're selling to is going to try to sell it for 55 bucks, you'd expect more than a couple bucks when you sold it to them.

    35. Re:It is better than buying used games by SJHiIlman · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that they shouldn't be able to do so; I just think paying for something with DRM--any DRM--is harmful.

    36. Re:It is better than buying used games by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is what it boils down to. To most people a game isn't worth the full asking price. Doesn't matter what it cost to produce, how badly EA employees are starving, it just isn't worth the money to most consumers. They only buy the game knowing that they can get half the money back by selling it second hand.

      If you break second hand sales you need to discount the game by 60% at least, otherwise most consumers are not going to buy it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:It is better than buying used games by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I think this is it. Look at steam top sellers, yes you will get some big titles in there. But you also get a lot of hey, this wierd inda game went on sale for 3 bucks. Everyone buys it, plays for a day and moves on. There are some interesting groups on there.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    38. Re: It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is more than one round of purchasing by, and replenishment to, retail & etail locations. If the stores don't sell through their initial copies of a title then they won't order more of that title (it's just like any other non-perishable product in that sense).

      If the lame-game cold potato makes its way through a lot of hands then the distributors for that game will not be fulfilling store orders for more of that game. It does affect wholesale sales of the lame game as well as lowering initial stocking orders of new games from that publisher and of that series (if they make another one).

    39. Re:It is better than buying used games by jittles · · Score: 1

      I am not an avid gamer, but I do occasionally play games. I will never drop $60 on a new game, and I won't go to Gamestop to spend $50 on a used one. What I will do, however is occasionally troll garage sales, and Amazon for interesting looking games. I bought the Force Unleashed I and II for $8 total a few weeks ago. If Microsoft's new system were in place, I never could have done that.

      While I am in no way affiliated with the site, I am a big fan of Slick Deals. There is another site called Fat Wallet, which I do not use (don't like the layout when I've tried it), that also specializes in deals. I spend, on average, $10 for a 360 game. I have so little time for gaming that a game is only worth about that much to me.

    40. Re: It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assume I purchase a game and the media has DRM, like a CD-Key.

      That's not really a counterexample, because it relies upon an implicit assumption that GP is using the term "DRM" as a metonym for technical protection measures (TPM) in general, when it is quite clear that he is referring to DRM specifically - not CD keys.

      Now to your point, it seems like you wish for no DRM at all, including keys to unlock media

      See, the underlined part is where you are putting words in someone else's mouth.

    41. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you use the Internet? Or a computer for that matter? Everything you do on the Internet and on a computer collects **anonymous** metrics of usage, stability, and performance.

    42. Re:It is better than buying used games by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Exactly... OP does not know his history.

      Steam existed since 2004 and had little to no discounts, other then what we had seen previously. Then in 2008 Direct2Drive was started to get some traction and their sales being reported on; suddenly in Dec of that same year Steam has it's first Steam Sale.

      After a few years of this Amazon soon started having their sales too; and now it's SOP for all the shops.

    43. Re:It is better than buying used games by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      How often are people screwed by selling their used games for pennies on the dollar?

      Never.

      First, you have no inherent right to recoup your costs. So, if you fail to do that, you're not getting screwed. Second, some used games sell for more than pennies on the dollar.

      The XBOX One scheme actually does two things: it provides consumer protection in the used game market by elevating prices

      What? That's not how it works, because no right of consumers is being protected here.

      and it appears to also provide minimal (and nominal) revenue for publishers when a game is resold.

      IOW, it is just another example of rent-seeking, which does not advance humanity in any way. Indeed, it retards progress by adding incentives to not progress, since you can continue to profit from old work done. But First Sale law is quite clear on this issue when it comes to physical goods, and there's no good reason why the sale of a virtual good should be treated differently.

      This model seems to work on Steam and TODAY nobody is bad-mouthing Steam after over a decade of DRM-encumbered operation.

      Bull. Fucking. Shit. I badmouth Steam over their DRM every time Steam comes up, and I'm certainly not alone. You, sir, are most likely a liar, and are ignorant at best.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    44. Re:It is better than buying used games by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It is also at best a distortion of the truth, but realistically, what we call a lie. If you beat a game quickly and care for the materials and it doesn't depend on a download-once DLC to be fun, and you handle the sale yourself, then you can usually sell the game for a large percentage of the purchase price. It's only if you hold onto the game for a long time (not long enough to become a serious collectible, mind you) that it depreciates strongly. You can also use a service (like gamestop) which will take far too large a cut, but nobody is forcing you to do that. But if Microsoft had their way, they would force you to give a percentage to them on every transaction, which should really be illegal, and which would be illegal in the USA if there were any sense to our laws. They want to call it "intellectual property" but they don't want it governed by the same laws as real property.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:It is better than buying used games by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Do you know anywhere in the US where you can rent as well as sell/buy used PC games?

      Rent? No. Sell/Buy? Yes. It is called eBay. I imagine you may have heard of it. I just got two Xbox 360 games from it, because they finally got cheap (AC brotherhood being one of them...) I got both games below Gamestop's prices, the one I have received so far has a pristine disc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:It is better than buying used games by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, at least last time I checked there wasn't a "Steam Only" game, aside of maybe some of Valve's own. And even there I'm fairly certain you can get a boxed version somehow that you needn't tie to some Steam account.

      (-1, Ignorant) You're fairly certain of something which is false. Valve games since Steam all require Steam, period, end of story.

      And if everything fails and you want to resell your games, there's always the option to create an account for that game you plan to resell only.

      Violation of T&C, grounds for termination and required to enter arbitration. I'm not paying Steam for the privilege of becoming all but a criminal (maybe being a criminal, if it's found you somehow violated copyright law by doing this) by working around the roadblock they placed in front of First Sale. And since I don't have a multi-megabit internet connection, I can't actually use Steam anyway. Once a game is installed, it updates more or less okay, but getting it installed can be nigh-impossible. I downloaded about 14GB before I gave up on TF2 (which is supposed to be what, 6GB?) and uninstalled Steam from Linux. Steam is garbage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:It is better than buying used games by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Steam is not the sole, take-it-or-leave-it offering on PC.

      And XBox is not the sole take-it-or-leave-it offering on console games. Don't like Xbox One's digital shop? Buy a Wii or Playstation.

    48. Re:It is better than buying used games by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The question shouldn't be how much less than new-price Gamestop sells it for. It should be how much less than their wholesale cost they buy it for. We don't have their wholesale pricelist, but I would estimate there's a pretty big markup. The pittance they pay for used games might even be 50% of their cost for stocking new games.

    49. Re:It is better than buying used games by Smauler · · Score: 1

      You haven't checked for a while, have you. Third party developers started being Steam only in 2006. From the link :

      "This is a list of games that require Steam authentication, regardless of whether they are purchased at retail or through other digital distribution services. An active Steam account is compulsory in order to authenticate and play these games on a personal computer. Games that also have a non-Steam version available separately are excluded from this list.

      This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it."

    50. Re:It is better than buying used games by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      IF you cut out Gamestop from your used games purchasing, you can get used games for half off or even cheaper (as opposed to GS's "Here 10 for your 60 dollar game, we'll resell it for 55"

    51. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always donwload them for free or get humble bundle. The point is that it is silly not to allow Steam to use you if you don't have to. I can afford their games and would buy some if I could sell them later.

    52. Re: It is better than buying used games by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      DRM keys to unlock media are largely useless. They get shared or they'll require an always on internet connection to validate the instance to be useful as DRM. MS realized this, and took the next step to lock it down. Apparently, people balked in large enough numbers to change that policy. So what happens? DRM is useless again, like it always has been for this use.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    53. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with that part: the fact that i can't resell my stuff is built into the price. When I pay $5 for a game, I don't care so much if I can't resell it. Before Steam, games usually cost at least $40...

      The thing I don't like about steam is the lack of control over the 'social' features. e..g. whenever I buy something, anybody I'm connected to can see what I bought.

    54. Re: It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC games

    55. Re: It is better than buying used games by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      PC games

      Complete sentence?

      Whatever you meant, it was lame, because I've bought used PC games on eBay, although I was just talking about console games.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re:It is better than buying used games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the US develops most of the world's software and popular culture, something Germany hasn't done since "Triumph of the Will" came out.

    57. Re:It is better than buying used games by kriston · · Score: 1

      While I do appreciate your views, the use of offensive language is completely unnecessary.

      --

      Kriston

    58. Re:It is better than buying used games by BTWR · · Score: 1

      That's why I do most of my used game shopping from Amazon. Great prices and, overall, a great company that has given excellent customer support to me over the years (along with their subsidiaries, especially Woot).

    59. Re: It is better than buying used games by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Nope, it was not useless. It was a minimally invasive way of giving protection software. I never ever shared a key with anyone, and own hundreds of titles with a key that I purchased over the last couple decades. In my case, the protection works as intended. Since keys are still being used with the same success today, I think it's safe to assume that my situation and respect of the "key" is not unique. On the contrary, I believe my respect for the law and well being of people working in the industry is the majority perspective.

      An extension of your logic would be to claim "Since the law prevented a person from being prosecuted for murder, all prosecution for murder is useless." That is not a logical or rational thought process. The same rules of society should apply, as should the same rules of logic and rational thinking. We don't lock everyone in prison to prevent murder, we teach the law and prosecute what we can. The same approach works very well with any criminal act. DRM that works is not so much a jail, but a way of educating and offering reminders of the rules. When a person shares the key and is caught, they should be prosecuted.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    60. Re: It is better than buying used games by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Sharing keys is a violation of the EULA. Sharing keys without copying the disk is pointless. Copying the disk in and of itself is no problem, although it might be a violation of the EULA as well. Distributing a copied disk is already covered as a violation of copyright. So DRM is still useless in this scenario as it enforces nothing. The fact that all DRM'd software you'd care to download is available on pirate sites is a trumpeting testament to exactly how ineffective and useless current DRM is as long as the lock and key are both held by the user. As soon as you separate the key, which is what MS tried to do, then you have a much more secure system that becomes much more difficult to break, as your options for DRM become much more interesting.

      You sure suck at arguing or you attempted to inject the most and most densely packed fallacies into a single post I've ever seen. First, you tried argumentum ad ignorantiam, by asserting DRM in its current form is not useless. Then several red herrings combined with moral high ground fallacies of "minimally invasive", respect of key, law, and people working in the industry (you could go either way with the last few). Then you load up a strawman and appeal to worse problems with regards to murder. Then incorporate some Reductio Ad Absurdum in the "lock everyone in prison" to finally some Appeal To Widespread Belief, that DRM is "educating" or "offering reminders of the rules".

      I missed a few in there, and some may actually be parts of others, such as the Bad Analogy (murder again). But there's only so much time in the day. Kudos. I'm impressed.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    61. Re: It is better than buying used games by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Well, you just failed miserably at reading the Wiki page for fallacy and deciding that know everything about fallacy? If I provide working examples of something, it can not be an argument from ignorance you twat! Your _opinion_ is that you don't like it, but to deny it works when there is proof positive that it does, it is _you_ arguing a false statement, not someone else committing fallacy.

      My claim that CD Keys are worth something is very valid. How many Windows users running valid copies of Windows does Microsoft have which prove my assertion that the technology works? Go ask Microsoft. Before you claim foul, or what ever you are going to invent as a fallacy, game makers like EA and Ubisoft have used the same key to similar effects.

      As stated, the concept of the key is not purely about jailing software. For jailing you need to spend a lot of money on products like FlexLM or i4LS. Instead of making false fallacy claims, why not go to the people who developed and use the technology? Microsoft realizes that they can't make that technology pirate proof, but they can nag and track you if you use pirated versions and connect to the internet.

      Minimally invasive is not a fallacy oh "low of IQ"! It's a description from the designers on what they wanted to do with the technology.

      I don't care if you dislike the comparative analogy, it works very well. Substitute any other crime and deterrent into with the statement "Piracy defeats CD keys so they are useless" and you get the same result. Look, I realize that basic logic may be very difficult for you, so let me give a few examples.

      Murders didn't get caught by forensics, so forensics is useless.

      Car thieves can circumvent locks on car doors and ignitions, so locks are useless.

      Do you see how that works? It's very basic logic but you will surely need lots of practice.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    62. Re: It is better than buying used games by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      You provided no working examples, you did provide some anecdotes.

      The mere presence of warez sites full of cracked copies of anything you'd care to name disproves your "effectiveness of DRM" claim. That the majority of people own legit copies is irrelevant. It doesn't even prove that people are honest, as they might not know about the warez sites, so never had another option. Or maybe they do, and they are honest. See how that works?

      I have to throw a statement in here - even if I owned an EA or Ubisoft game - I'd never install their DRM crap. I'd crack or obtain a cracked version and run DRM free. I don't need their crapware DRM ruining my system, thank you very much.

      Piracy doesn't defeat the CD keys. People do, for whatever reason. If you make CD key DRM too difficult, or if a user loses the CD key and cannot or will not buy a new copy but still feels entitled to play the copy they bought, then cracking the software becomes the only option. Are they pirates? No, they bought a legit copy. Are they breaking the law? Until the DMCA - no. Morally? No. But we're getting off topic.

      So we go back to your failed analogies - they're false, and apparently you can't make a real argument. So now you fall back to insulting and belittling remarks. Another "fallacy" approach, although the actual name escapes me at the moment. You just keep going, do you have a checklist? Can you address any of the actual points made in 3 posts now? I'm sure we are all on the edge of our seats.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    63. Re: It is better than buying used games by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, EA, and Ubisoft using Keys is not an example and is an anecdote? The rest of your comments demonstrate that you either can't read, or can't comprehend what you read. Wholly shit you are handicapped. Have fun in your fantasy land, I'll read no more of your delusional rantings.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    64. Re: It is better than buying used games by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      No - they are not - they are counter-examples, since all their products are available on warez sites.

      You apparently are devoid of logic and debating skills. Try and have a good day.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  7. Why? by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are there even ads on the Xbox? After all you've:

    A) Bought the console
    B) Bought some games (presumably)
    C) Quite possibly bought a gold membership

    Now, I can understand something like when you go to the store to have maybe a little promo of "what's new" but beyond that, ads are unacceptable.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Why? by maxsthekat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because, fuck you, pay me. That's why.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because they want more.

      The money you gave them for the console wasn't enough. The money you gave for the games, and their cut of that, wasn't enough. The membership you bought wasn't enough. They want more. They want it all.

      Apparently they actually believe that selling ads and making their paying customers sit through, or even force them to interact with, more ads, will not impact sales of the machine at all. Or at least impact it less than the money they'll make selling the ads.

      Perhaps they see the future of the world, and it is Orwellian, with a monitoring device in every home -- and they've decided to BE that monitoring device. Fascism can be so profitable, after all.

    3. Re:Why? by antdude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do we still have ads on cable TV when it started with none decades ago?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Why? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2

      I don't know, and that's one of the reasons why I cut the cable a couple of years ago and why I've got Netflix (which is ad free) instead of Hulu Plus (which has ads).

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:Why? by antdude · · Score: 0

      Netflix will probably get ads. later on like on discs (before movie, shows/series, start). :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Why? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Everyone is convinced that earning $500 from a console sale is chump change compared to the pennies they can get from advertising!

    7. Re:Why? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      The answer to both questions is the same: because subscription revenue alone no longer covers the costs of content and distribution. Advertising is why XBL is $50/year for all of the services they provide instead of $200 for fewer services. Or to use a cable TV example, it's why every channel producing scripted content isn't $15/month like HBO.

      Which is not to say it's a great outcome, but the public has shown time and time again that they'll accept advertising in exchange for staving off service cost increases. As MS has found out, all of that content that makes users flock to XBL (and hopefully flock to XB1) is expensive.

    8. Re:Why? by citizenr · · Score: 2

      Try typing that question into your Windows 8.1 search bar.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix is not ad free. After several movies I've watched on there trailers for house of cards and other shows interrupt the credits (which I personally enjoy watching). At least they don't charge much.

    10. Re:Why? by Clsid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem is that all the "services" XBL provided for a fee, Sony provided for free on a PS3.

    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people put up with it.

    12. Re:Why? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I have Hulu Plus and Netflix. Every time Hulu starts this ad shit I am clutching for the remote. Fuck you, I paid already, I don't want your shit bad enough to both pay and have ads. The only reason I have hulu at all was the netflix 2 stream limit and they fixed that so hulu was already on the way out anyway. It would be nice if netflix had some more mature content but it isn't that hard to find that.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    13. Re:Why? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Those are not netflix ads. They are part of the content.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    14. Re:Why? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't get why Hulu+ has ads for paid members. Greedy companies! Gah.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    15. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Fascism is by definition profitable for corporations.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of "ad". To me, any kind of "information" about how much I'd love to watch some other show on their program which is thrown at me before, after, in between and at whatever other point they manage to squeeze it in DOES count as an ad.

      At the very least once it has been repeated often enough that you can actually speak along to the announcer it's even surpassed the annoyance I usually get out of ads.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe MS will offer an additional service to remove the ads... like the DVR.

      Triple dippin'

    18. Re:Why? by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      I would not be so irritated if the ads were not 10DB louder than the programs.

    19. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer to both questions is the same: because subscription revenue alone no longer covers the millions of payouts that are done to a few coorporate bigwigs.

      There, fixed that for you.

      FYI: Most companies are not there to balance cost and income just to break-even. The commercial thought seems to be that the more income can be generated (with a lesser cost) the better.

      That is often why the OTA stuff (and comparable) give you hours-upon-hours of cheap "reality TV" (while liberally sprinkeling them with advertisements ofcourse).

      Just thought you might want to know.

    20. Re:Why? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      You failed to mention "Sold your soul, and that of your firstborn, even up to the seventh generation" This is MS we are talking about.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    21. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "services" are all bullshit. What does it cost Microsoft for me to watch Netflix on my 360? Nothing. Youtube? Nothing. So why does Microsoft charge for it? To justify their live subscription fee. At least Sony gives you a free game each month with their subscription. And no, five year old games don't count Microsoft.

      When I first subscribed to live, they had 1v100 live. It was an awesome live interactive game show. I felt like I was getting my moneys worth. When that was cancelled, I felt like I was being cheated, and I eventually cancelled my subscription. I'm not going to buy an XBox One. I don't think I'm alone in that either.

    22. Re:Why? by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      to me suggestions to similar shows at credit roll are not ads. I can respect your opinion differently though. Or did I miss what your talking about?

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    23. Re:Why? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      "Sold your soul, and that of your firstborn, even up to the seventh generation"

      But the Xbox One is eighth generation...

    24. Re:Why? by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, if they did that they would have to have a whole set of NEtflix only discs pressed, and another set for Redbox, and another set for whoever else might offer a similar service.

      Much easier to make 100k discs of the same type; than 10k of this one, 15k of this one, 5k of this one.

    25. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um wrong - XBL has been $50 for years and they seem to eb doing just fine with a bunch of advertising. This is a new cash grab by Micro$oft and total bullshit. Like many others have mentioned you are not getting your games or consoles or anything for less as a trade off for being pimped out, you are in fact paying full price for the privilege of having all your privacy sold to the highest bidder.

    26. Re:Why? by antdude · · Score: 1

      I thought FCC banned that. Or is that only for TV and not online? Ugh!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    27. Re:Why? by antdude · · Score: 1

      I meant streaming. On discs, there are ads before starting the movies. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    28. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, steam handles the same things and also doesn't have any subscription fee and only ads for its own platform. The costs must be more than doable, especially if people buy games through your system.

    29. Re:Why? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      why do I get all those services for free on a system Microsoft can't limit what sw gets run? most xbl gold stuff doesn't cost microsoft a dime and the stuff that costs is that way because you can't host your own servers on pc's you own in the country you live in.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    30. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is not ads on my pay TV, only on my free over the air antennae. We usually watch the ad free Paid TV (Netflix).

    31. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not at all, you got it just fine, and of course you may disagree and not view it as a nuisance.

      To me, the credits are part of the movie and I want to see them. Especially in older movies they do provide a nice "exit", often the final closure after the movie's end. In some movies, scenes running in the background of the credits are sometimes even turning the ending around (I distinctly remember one horror movie I can't even remotely remember the name of where the "nice couple" of course survived and I was already kinda pissed over the rather cliche ending only to see them being stabbed during the credits while we see the only sensible, level headed person (who wasn't very PC and very family friendly and hence got "killed" early and off screen, as if to make an example of being "bad" gets you killed) gets away because he hid among the corpses. And that ending did actually satisfy me a lot. Had I not watched the credits, I would have chalked it off as another cliche horror movie I wasted my time on.

      But aside of cutting credits to make room for self-advertising, what bothers me even more is that those pay-TV channels now start interrupting shows to show their self-ads. And that's just plain out if you advertise with "no ads".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    32. Re:Why? by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Ok, very fair point. I guess I like the credits in bob burger. And now that you mention it, probably in more than I thought about. On xbox, I guess I don't think it is nusience "too much" cause a quick b button and it is out. But if you have wireless, they can tend to disconect on you. I would still rank this bounds above a lot of others though.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
  8. Just what I've always wanted! by SJHiIlman · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I want a game console, what I actually want are advertisements! And the Xbox One offers interactive advertisements, no less! Sure, you could just play games to get your fill of interactive content, but why play games when you could watch ads? Who plays games, anyway? Certainly not people who buy the Xbox One; they'll be too busy with ads.

    1. Re:Just what I've always wanted! by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hello, this is the Sarcasm Detector. Your post has been flagged as "sarcastic" and will be deleted in 1 minute. If you are receiving this in error, please immediately gesture to your Kinect in a non-sarcastic manner. Thank you, and now a word from our sponsors before your game begins.

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    2. Re:Just what I've always wanted! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      *gives manual binary-4 salute*

      Non-sarcastic enough?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Just what I've always wanted! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There's only one gesture I can think of doing to the kinect in this case.

    4. Re:Just what I've always wanted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XBox One(TM) : Play TV. Watch Games. Experience Advertising.

    5. Re:Just what I've always wanted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what should happen is someone make a small cheap device tubular device that plays a looped movie of 'fuck you' or overand over that clips onto the lense when you are not using it.

      or a kids kaleidoscope or hypnotic patterns with these are NOT the terrorists you are looking for!

       

    6. Re:Just what I've always wanted! by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Consider a company that just develops interactive game apps as advertisements. It could actually be fun, with the right design.

      Use the phone model, or toilet gaming (that's what I call it, and I practice it...).

      The key would be 1-2 minutes of fun playtime, and then a guaranteed coupon (maybe offer a base coupon without the game, but if the person wins they get a better coupon, if they win a more difficult level, maybe another tier of coupon).

      Take companies on, help with the design of the game and then implement it, alone with a core coupon service system.

      Shoot, add a dedicated app for such advertisements, let the user pick the product they are interested in (or just the game), and away they go.

      Coupon Gaming. I bet it could work.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  9. Heres a command.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GO FUCK YOURSELVES MICROSOFT.

    1. Re:Heres a command.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would need to say xbox first...

    2. Re:Heres a command.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm unable to comply.

  10. Make xbone free or fuck that fucking shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need to patent game controller technology that reads your finger prints to sell your highly personalized data to anyone.

    1. Re:Make xbone free or fuck that fucking shit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think patenting giving this "the finger" would make you insanely rich instead.

      I could somehow see people even paying a licensing fee just to do it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Make xbone free or fuck that fucking shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you or I get a patent on the PS4? I bet Sony's already got that.

  11. XBox One = Marketing platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll say it again:

    The primary purpose of the XBox One is to be a platform for selling ads. On the one hand, publishers no longer need to solicit for static advertising in games, now they can have Microsoft be the entire advertising platform. It's like embedding a Google ad on your blog and collecting the revenue, only now on a HUGE scale. On the other hand, no longer do advertisers need to pay a ton for static ads on pre-releae titles, hoping that the ad retains enough relevance to be beneficial to their business. Publishers win, Microsoft wins, and advertisers win. Welcome to the future!

    Kinect is all about generating advertising hints. It just is. There's no other sane reason why it supposedly cannot be turned off. It's there to collect hints on your environment, feed them to the Bing ad platform, and generate in-game ads as a result.

    The always-on, regularly dial-home connectivity scheme was all about exchanging advertising hints for ads. Microsoft can capture advertisers by guaranteeing nearly real-time freshness of their advertising.

    And lastly, the "co-process in the cloud" is all about advertising. Polygons aren't going to be rendered in the cloud, ad textures are. Turn that off and I bet there will be a lot of empty textures in just about every XB1 game that comes out, from AAA titles to $5 throw-aways.

    Microsoft is selling you to the advertisers. It's just as simple as that.

    1. Re:XBox One = Marketing platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth.

      MS isn't selling the XBox One to consumers. They are selling it to publishers and distributors. As such, they emphasize its revenue potential as an ad platform.

      The publishers and distributors then sell the XBox One to gamers. They want big profits and relevant ad delivery, so they bring their AAA titles exclusively to XBox One. Then sheep buy the platform because they HAVE to have those games. MS isn't selling to consumers and expecting buy-in from the distributors because they have a large player-base, they're deliberately going about it in the opposite direction.

      In order for MS to win, they have to convince the publishers and distributors. They don't care what the end-user thinks, unless such a huge backlash comes up that it ends up scaring the people they're really marketing the console to.

  12. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only old people use Bing. And only then because likely they confused it with Bingo.

  13. ads in win 8.1 too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are integrating ads in the coming win8.1 update too. i don't follow ms news much but i read somewhere that when you use the search function in 8.1 to launch something it will feature ads also. Is that true?

    1. Re:ads in win 8.1 too by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

      After Internet Explorer 4's "Desktop enhancements" gave you an ad-filled channelbar way back in 1997 as well as shipping Windows 98 with it, it's hard to believe it it's false.

    2. Re:ads in win 8.1 too by artor3 · · Score: 1

      It certainly looks that way.

      The article contains a quote offering a nice reminder of who Microsoft is really working for:

      The goal, [Microsoft general manager David] Pann says, is to give advertisers access to consumers across a broader variety of their daily activities, not just when they’re overtly conducting a search.

      I suppose that broader variety also includes gaming or watching movies.

  14. Wonderful. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 4, Funny

    So will I have to run in place for ten seconds to skip a weight loss ad and play my game?

    1. Re:Wonderful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be awesome. Invasive and corrupt as fuck but damn that would be funny. The ad won't go away until you jog in place for an hour.

    2. Re:Wonderful. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why do I think that most geeks would rather spend 10 hours trying to find a way around it than 1 hour doing it?

      Of course it's because it is invasive and to make a point about privacy. No other reason could possibly exist.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Wonderful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I think that most geeks would rather spend 10 hours trying to find a way around it than 1 hour doing it?

      Of course it's because it is invasive and to make a point about privacy. No other reason could possibly exist.

      10 hours once, or 1 hour every time you draw that particular ad from the pool.

      Obviously 1000 hours of 1 hour expenditures is better value than one 10 hour single expenditure, it's just 'good' economics.

    4. Re:Wonderful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now your pulse is high so you lose your FPS match right after. Oh wait, this is consoles we are talking about.

  15. NSA connect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any bets on how much Microsoft got for giving the NSA a backdoor into the Kinect cameras?

    1. Re:NSA connect by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Wrongo, moosebreath. The NSA mandate is omniscience. That includes the fat and dickless as much as the hot moms doing Tantric Yoga. It all must be recorded. Admin contractors though, they have a preference. That is why Bing integration gives live video stream context search. "Bing, find blonde women doing yoga."

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:NSA connect by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I know, that makes it so funny to make them have to do it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. It's all about the camera. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    It's all about the camera. The one in your living-room. Considering who Microsoft is working with these days, do you really want a camera in your living-room?

  17. Too good to be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is a feature all of us gamers have been waiting for years for.
    Forget about occulous and all that crap give me targeted advertisements. I can't wait until my girlfriend walks by and my Xbox just streams non stop hooker ads and date services my demo loves so much.

  18. Mark Penn by tuppe666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Meet Mark Penn http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/technology/microsoft-battles-google-by-hiring-political-brawler-mark-penn.html?_r=1& This *cough* shitslinger of joys like scroogled is also in charge of include a blind taste test, Coke-versus-Pepsi style, of search results from Google and Microsoft’s Bing.

    Mr. Penn was put in charge of innocently titled “strategic and special projects” its nice that his work bulldozing enemies of the Clintons is now but to work slinging shit at Google.

    Ironically this is another article about Bing being shoved down peoples throats in another Duopoly rather than competing on old fashioned things like competition. Perhaps Microsoft Time and Money would be spent serving its hostages.

    1. Re:Mark Penn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Microsoft is a company that's behaving like a spoilt child being denied dessert.

      They're desperately in need of some adult supervision.

  19. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia Bing searches you!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  20. Camera back at you by gbnz · · Score: 0

    As if every government agency reading your stuff is not bad enough. The NSA can now watch what your doing in the living room. ..... will have to create cardboard cut outs to fool them into thinking I have the perfect family!

    1. Re:Camera back at you by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The NSA can now watch what your doing in the living room.

      I pity the agent who has to watch this.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Interactive Ads? by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that really isn't going to work. I mean, the only things that will be said to the screen will be a variety of invitations to sexual acts or to vacate.

    1. Re:Interactive Ads? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're trying to do a survey on the development of cursing in the various stages of adulthood. It would certainly offer a wide variety of input in that field.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. I can picture conversations in my living room now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Me: Hey Bob, did you hear about Kim Gong Eel's new rocket? It has a long tube with two balls attached for the explosives...
    Bob: Wow really!? That sounds pretty neat, how does it.... whoah wait, why is your tv playing porn videos now?
    Me: Oh don't worry about that, it's the new xbox connect one serving us ads... silly thing!

    -- stoops

  23. You can't buy hardware from Apple/Microsoft by tuppe666 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why are there even ads on the Xbox? After all you've:

    A) Bought the console

    B) Bought some games (presumably)

    C) Quite possibly bought a gold membership

    Now, I can understand something like when you go to the store to have maybe a little promo of "what's new" but beyond that, ads are unacceptable.

    Except you don't buy anything anymore you don't own your xbox...games...service you license them. Suck it up or by an alternative product of which there is many. I have bought an OuYa.

  24. Good luck with that, MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just one more reason to not buy the console. It's almost like Microsoft begrudges the fact that they're selling a game console and would rather just sell an ad-delivery mechanism. A VERY expensive one, at that.

    1. Re:Good luck with that, MS by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, technically they ARE selling you an ad-delivery mechanism. The console shell is just there to make you want it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Sounds good to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I get a game where I'm allowed to strange those stupid bone-eating people, I'll fucking buy whatever crap they have to sell to me, other than their stank-ass Chicken.

    I do have standards.

    Also let me dropkick those annoying Cellphone kids. Or at least the adult.

  26. Will it understand vulgar commmands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, after the novelty wears off and you get some stupid ad for adult diapers so you never have to get off the couch again for the 158th time, will it understand the command to go fuck itself and just skip to the end or will it annoy you yet again with having to wait....and say a word.....then wait....then say another word....and force negative engagement until users hate the console far more than they hate the advertisers?

    Fucking brilliant MS. Fucking Brilliant. If nothing else manages to kill the Xbox console, this will.

  27. DRM at a cost by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    This model seems to work on Steam and TODAY nobody is bad-mouthing Steam after over a decade of DRM-encumbered operation.

    I am against DRM on steam(and am far from being alone)...and many include myself bad mouth it. I would rather all my games were DRM free. I buy from steam because they are *cheap*...in my mind disposable, because I am prepared to pay less money from a game I license instead of own(yes I am playing hard and fast with English what of it).

    The difference is DRM on the xbox is that games are $60...and come on physical media.

    The bottom line is this has nothing to do with the article in question, which is about spying on customers and shovelling targeted ads down their throats, on a device costing more than the opposition who don't.

    1. Re:DRM at a cost by kriston · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's right, my post really had little to do with the article in question.

      --

      Kriston

  28. Good god man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only hope this piece of shit comes with a free vasectomy, cause any idiot that buys one SHOULD NOT reproduce. Even on accident!

    1. Re:Good god man by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Indirectly. The way MS has you at the balls with this makes sure that they will eventually just shrivel up.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Most negative publicity... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2

    This is perhaps the most negative publicity that I've seen for a console before it even came out. Even the failures like the 3DO had great publicity (the 3DO was named Time's 'product of the year')

    Has there been -anything- positive that has come out of the Xbox One's pre-launch that hasn't just been damage control?

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Most negative publicity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3DO was killed by the manufacturers trying to sell it at the same price as deluxe media players instead of treating it like a gaming machine.

      The nearest to the current situation I can see is when Sega screwed up horribly with the Saturn (curiously pushed into it by Sony too), but even that had entirely to do with Sega not knowing what they were doing, rather than actively going against the players.

    2. Re:Most negative publicity... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What killed the 3DO was simply that its ability to play "movies" (I'll use that term loosely here in comparison to today's abilities) was pushed WAY to prominently into the front, and that everything and every kind of game just HAD to have some sort of movie-like quality. Whether that made sense for this particular game or not. And some games even sold entirely on the "look, we got really awesome movie graphics" angle, which has been a fairly reliable way throughout the ages to make a quick buck but also to annoy gamers fairly quickly. And I'm not even talking about the infamous "plumbers don't wear ties", which is a showcase example of WHAT has been wrong with the 3DO.

      In short, the technology wasn't ready to be a prime-time feature, but it was used as one. Like, say, motion input is today.

      So yes, the chance for a repetition with the XB1 is kinda high.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Most negative publicity... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What killed the 3DO was simply that its ability to play "movies"

      No, no no. What killed the 3DO was that it was stupidly expensive and had shitty graphics. It had no 3D, at a time when arcade games were going 3d. Then the Saturn came out, and was followed by the Playstation, and the N64, and the 3DO became a footnote. It didn't help that there were literally zero great games.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  30. No Thanks, Ballmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks, Ballmer.
    PS4 preordered.
    Fuck that shit.

  31. Idiocracy... by turp182 · · Score: 2

    Here's the new screen layout:
    http://codinghorror.typepad.com/.a/6a0120a85dcdae970b0120a86dd2e5970b-pi

    To some degree we are getting there (it's worse on the XBox 360):
    http://cdn-static.zdnet.com/i/r/story/70/00/002993/original/w8rtm-windows-8-start-620x.jpg?hash=MwZ2ZmL2AQ

    And Mike Judge is a god in my mind: Idiocracy, Office Space (I wore a suit for a few years early on) and Beavis and Butthead.

    Anyway, I have to get back to Aww my Balls. Stop interrupting me. You broke my apartment.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  32. Huh! I just got it by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looking at a still photo of the XBox One screen just made me realize... it finally dawned on me where Microsoft got the idea for the start screen tiles on XBox and Windows 8.

    It's the Wii. All they've done is let you have some of the boxes be bigger than the others - but it's basically the Wii's interface that Nintendo released in 2006.

    Even the ads. The Wii used the boxes for the Shop to advertise stuff you could buy.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Huh! I just got it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I tried to point that out, ages ago. They don't call it "Wiindows", or "Wintendo" for nothing. :)

    2. Re:Huh! I just got it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are too many words on the idiocracy screen. Can you really see the average person today, let alone two years into the future reading that many words on a TV screen? It should just be logos and butts.

  33. Going to be some fun parsing there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only imagine how much fun the parsing team is going to have testing all the likely responses:

    * fuck off
    * seriously, eat a dick MS
    * get this fucking ad off my TV
    * wtf I paid for this piece of shit and now it's spamming me with fucking ads
    * hang on, let me get my sledgehammer
    * NO CARRIER - Kinect signal lost

  34. I prefer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had the choice between a game system that served up ads by watching me while I was playing , vs dipping my legs, covered in hot sauce, into a pool of starving piranhas... I'd take my chances with the fish.

  35. Re:I can picture conversations in my living room n by RussR42 · · Score: 1

    Farnsworth: "Shut up friends! My internet browser heard us saying the word Fry and it found a movie about Philip J. Fry for us. It also opened my calendar to Friday and ordered me some french fries."

  36. A million sales execs get excited in their pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinect> Posture detected: hunched
    message: "Dear Product, how about a nice gallon of doublechockolate ice cream? Now only 4.99 with free delivery!"

    Kinect> Event detected: spill
    message: "Dear Product, get a new couch today! Now available in <matching color>!"

  37. NO ADS by Seumas · · Score: 1

    For $500+$60/yr +$65/game + $??? for all the peripherals over the years I DO NOT WANT MOTHER FUCKING ADVERTISING... PERIOD.

  38. Last xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Love our xbox with Kinect. If this is true will switch to something more consumer friendly.

  39. Xbox Telescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft's Skype, has a backdoor for the NSA to do stuff like live surveillance. This came out in the PRISM/CHESS documents.
    So your XBox with its dual Kinect cameras sitting on the TV, and its always-on connections to the Internet could well also have an NSA back door to it, like Skype does.

    Also from the Blackhat presentation, Skype is obfuscated code and may contain back doors beyond surveillance of calls, e.g. maybe they can turn mic/camera on remotely:
    https://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-europe-06/bh-eu-06-biondi/bh-eu-06-biondi-up.pdf

    It's all very 1984 telescreen

    1. Re:Xbox Telescreen by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      OK, I won't feel bad, then, that my Skype account is "Blocked" for no reason that they care to explain.

    2. Re:Xbox Telescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this is scary. And very true.

    3. Re:Xbox Telescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also from the Blackhat presentation, Skype is obfuscated code and may contain back doors beyond surveillance of calls, e.g. maybe they can turn mic/camera on remotely:
      https://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-europe-06/bh-eu-06-biondi/bh-eu-06-biondi-up.pdf

      It's all very 1984 telescreen

      That's why you always turn the kinect in the opposite direction when not using it. Granted, this doesn't solve the audio. I also always tape over laptop webcams.

  40. Yea this will work good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinect may offer you a 'Choose Your Own Adventure' style narrative in which you speak commands or give orders to an ad as its playing to change the final outcome.

    User: Shut the fuck up
    Ad: But
    User: Fuck off

    Do they really think we as a society love ads or some shit? Seriousely thats why Adblock plus is so freaking popular nowadays on browsers as it is because if it wasn't the webs a pretty messed up place even more so.

  41. Feedback Loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They play adverts, they monitor the kinect camera, and they can see which ads have an effect and are watched. XBox is an ads mans wet dream. Never mind that its a customers nightmare.

    Also the possibilities for profit are endless:

    Suppose you are in the UK and have an XBox with Kinect. NSA can legally spy on Brits, so it buys spy time on XBox Kinects to watch a target. Turns on the camera, gets its surveillance data and hey presto, leverage. Maybe a politicians family is in, the son is smoking pot, that's paydirt and you as customer brought the surveillance camera into your own home and wired it up yourself and even pay for the connection to the NSA!

    Would Microsoft sell them access? Well it provided live Skype taps, message+voice+video taps on Skype. And Skype must have some business model we can't see to justify its $7 billion price. So yeh, damn right!

    1. Re:Feedback Loop by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced every congress-person, when first elected, gets a late night call with just a few carefully chosen words, or a nearly forgotten name or two, just to let them know the nature of the game they are in.

    2. Re:Feedback Loop by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      they monitor the kinect camera, and they can see which ads have an effect and are watched.

      That's great, isn't it? They can learn that no ads have an affect and no ads are watched and it's pointless trying to cram more of them down my throat.

  42. Parent speaks the truth by Camael · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yup. MS said so themselves.

    Xbox One built for ads from the ground up

    So what about the future of advertising on the Xbox One? “It’s going to be an exciting transition though because the 360 console wasn’t built with advertising in mind, it was more of an afterthought, so we’ve had to adapt to the technology and how we work to fit them in to the console,” said Technical Account Manager for Xbox LIVE Advertising, “whereas this new one is going to have advertising in mind. So a lot of the limitations that we have now, hopefully the release of the boundaries will widened so the opportunities will be a lot greater.”

  43. Steve Ballmer is in charge by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Need I say more?

  44. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just simply WTF!

  45. Re: Bing, Bing, Bing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Bing for about six months a couple years ago because I thought it might offer more privacy than Google but with the recent NSA revelations that has been disproven.
    I thought I would wait till next year to buy an Xbox One and see how it does. I really have no reason to anymore... too many moral tradeoffs. I see myself returning to PC gaming once the Xbox 360 dies off.

  46. What ad really need by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I usually use a site as a landing page and reflexively go to my intended site (email, calendar, etc) from there, or I'm on some other site with links out. Sometimes, as soon as I click a link to where I want to go, I notice an ad on the originating page for something I actually might be interested in. But when I go back to that page, I rarely can get a repeat performance of the original ad; surprisingly I seem to get a cycle of the about a half dozen others, but rarely including the first. There should be some way to force an affinity between ads and the back button. After all, I'm not likely to bounce on the refresh button just to see what different ads come up, but it is possible that I might use the back button to get back to something I was interested in.

    --
    Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
    1. Re:What ad really need by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Middle click instead. That will open your link in a new tab and the original will be preserved.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  47. Can anybody tell me... by not_surt · · Score: 2

    Why does my Xbone keep serving me ads for lotion and tissues? Surely it can see I already have plenty at hand.

  48. Unsourced speculation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the source for this story? I just see a bunch of bold claims with nothing to back them up.

  49. Can see in infra-red? by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

    Based on comments from Microsoft, supposedly the Kinect can see where the blood is going in your body, if your hands were hot etc. (i.e. see in infrared wavelengths in addition to visual) via "active infrared". This would also mean it would be able to look through (to an extent) light clothing. How the bozo's at the top of Microsoft thought this was a good idea is hard to fathom - as this will blow up in their faces (another thing, yet again).

    1. Re:Can see in infra-red? by lxs · · Score: 1

      A cheap camera like the one in a kinect can only see near infrared, so unless your blood is the temperature of molten lead it won't react to the IR from your body. Body heat sensitive cameras (i.e. far infrared) are still twice as expensive as any console on the market and have low resolution so they are less than useless for a kinect.

  50. in an age of hacking by Tifer · · Score: 1

    it was decided that an always-online mandatory webcam was the new way forward.

  51. You must watch the ads by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Xbox One recognizes your face. It knows if you're watching. They're in a position to insist that you watch the ads. Leave during an ad, and everything pauses until you get back to finish watching the ad.

    "It sees you when you're sleeping. It knows when you're awake. It knows if you've been bad or good."

    1. Re:You must watch the ads by ryukenmaster · · Score: 1

      Hinh Sex is beatifull

  52. Lotion and Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we've kept the kinect on for 24/7 and have determined that 90% of our customer base have something in common.

    When they stop playing video games, they immediately start watching porn. We've determined that rather than implementing our DRM strategies, were we to start selling subscriptions to a lotion delivery service, we could make BILLIONS.

    MSFT marketing department.

  53. Xbox One = NSA spy device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's get this straight, for those of you still too thick to understand what Microsoft is doing.

    - the console refuses to function UNLESS the Kinect sensor system is fully operational
    - attempts to cover the Kinect camera lenses or point Kinect at a wall cause the console to immediately pester the user to 'recalibrate' Kinect
    - Microsoft insists that every app and game uses Kinect input to a certain degree, even if this means an optional input mechanism for menu screens. There are ZERO games and apps that will completely ignore Kinect functionality.
    - Kinect sensors are operating ALL the time (no user disable, which is why you can NEVER use the console if Kinect is unplugged).
    - The console dedicates 2 CPU cores (from 8), a significant chunk of dedicated hardware processing functionality on the GPU/DSP side, a significant amount of the RAM, and a large portion of the HDD for the exclusive use of the Kinect system. Not even a AAA game can access this set-aside hardware for its own use- Kinect is always able to run at full potential no matter what game is running.
    - Kinect constantly monitors each person that enters (or leaves) the room, and stores a full face photo of each person. This data is uploaded to servers whenever the console connects to the Internet. Remote servers can use the full face photo, combined with the known address of the console, to make a hugely accurate informed 'guess' as to the identity of the person.
    - The Xbox One can be remotely made to stream video and sound from Kinect (of programmable quality/bandwidth) by any authorised remote server. For instance, every online Xbox One appears on an NSA list, and NSA personnel can tell any of these consoles to begin (within tens of milliseconds) streaming Kinect data to their servers. Or put even simpler, every online Xbox One is a window into that home for the NSA.
    - Xbox One consoles can be instructed to capture streamed data from the Kinect on the internal HDD for later uploading when Internet connection is restored.
    - Lists of trigger conditions can be downloaded to any console- triggers that will automatically activate Kinect data gathering and streaming. Triggers might include a gunshot, certain people entering the room, people having sex in the room, a man speaking Arabic, sounds of a domestic disturbance, someone using the 'N'-word (look how that simple detail brought down a powerful woman recently- remember the usefulness of gathering potential 'blackmail' info).

    So much attention was given to helping the NSA, that Microsoft forgot to bother making the console worth buying in the first place. It has 1/2 (as in 50%) of the GPU performance of Sony's PS4, yet costs more. Its GPU design needs special programming, unlike the clean GPU sub-system of the PS4 (this despite the fact that both consoles use the same AMD base graphics processing units).

    Microsoft is pushing this ad crap to try to explain to VERY dumb sheep why the Kinect system is always-on. The really dumb sheep are supposed to be still unaware of the unbelievable extent of the NSA abuses. Even now, in gaming forums aimed at Xbox users, the consensus successful pushed by Microsoft reputation managers is that the NSA spying allegations have been disproved, but obviously when the rotten console finally goes on sale, and tests prove the Kinect is always running, some cover story will be needed to justify this.

  54. Think of the porn by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

    Oh come on
    Think of the PORN millions of xboxes could produce... for free!

    We'll have a whole new category for porn now and you too can access is for $10 a month on xboxkinection.com

    For a reasonable fee of $50 per year AND $5 per message Micro-One-Dating will also put you in touch with single attractive dating prospects!
    Ignore the SQUICK we cut to the QUICK! Why stalk the girl of your dreams and get arrested peeping through her window when we can provide you with high resolution full colour video - and NOW we feature On Demand for just a little extra $$!

    Join the ratemyxboxoneperformance.com site as we now are accepting public submissions in addition to those provided by the professional critics at MicroSoft headquarters!

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  55. Do not want by Beavertank · · Score: 2

    No, really, I'm not kidding, there is no possible additional feature or "exclusive" game or service that could make me EVER buy something like this.

    Do not want with a fierce burning passion.

    1. Re:Do not want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what i said back when games first started requiring someone else's permission to play, but hundreds of millions of people bought them, just like they will buy devices with video surveillance.

      There is no limit to what people will accept if you introduce it slowly and package it with bread and circuses.

    2. Re:Do not want by ryukenmaster · · Score: 1

      Hinh Sex , xnxx , Phim sex online is the beatifull all right?

  56. Kill Yourself by caspy7 · · Score: 1

    I'm fine with this as long as there are enough alternate scenes so that at any point in time I can say, "Kill yourself." and all on-screen characters will suddenly find creative ways to do so.
    This would be endlessly entertaining.
    I would be telling my friends which commercial to watch and when to say something.
    Maybe that's the future of commercials: viral Easter Egg hunts.

    (No, I don't actually think this is a ad integration is a good thing.)

  57. It gets better by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slimfast and match.com is gonna be appearing on most I bet.

    Don't forget about the possibility of ads from local chiropractors!

    It can play the moment you put your back out.

    "Hi, this is Kinect Bob. I see you are screaming in agony and prone on the floor, would you like me to contact Dr. Friendly for you? Twitch to the left for YES".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  58. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do we really need Soviet Russia anymore? I was under the impression we already surpassed them by leaps and bounds when it comes to domestic spying and keeping the population under control.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  59. Can't you just put it in a sock? by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apparently it needs to be connected for hte xbox to work. But can't you just put a sock over it? Congrats MS.. you get a first hand look at what the inside of my sock looks like... 24/7.

    The Orwellian parallel is the TVs in 1984 which couldn't be turned off and could spy on you. People in the book used to put curtains over the TVs when they weren't using them. But they couldn't turn them off. They'd just sit there all day and all night... and you had to put a curtain over them if you wanted any sleep. Do the same with this stupid connect device. Put a sock over it.

    Or do the really bright thing and don't buy it. MS is not providing what the consumer wants. This is not an honest product.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Can't you just put it in a sock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the microphone is still always on...always, never off... you'll be screaming while having sex and suddenly you'll hear an advertisement for condoms.... :P

    2. Re:Can't you just put it in a sock? by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      But can't you just put a sock over it? Congrats MS.. you get a first hand look at what the inside of my sock looks like... 24/7.

      The Xbox One Kinect uses IR in addition to visible light. From this article:

      Microsoft has even boosted the Kinect's infrared vision, which results in a number of dramatic improvements.

      No longer will you have to play in a well and evenly lit room for the sensor to recognize your gestures, and conversely you won't end up with sunshine blooms interfering with the Kinect.

      We were shown how it could still track a person's movements in a totally dark room as well as how a bright flashlight beam shone on the person wasn't even viewable by the sensor's IR mode.

      On what sounded like a science-fiction-esque promise, we were also told that the new Kinect's IR capabilities would be able to track your heart beat, by detecting the flow of blood under the surface of your face.

      So my guess would be that the sock wouldn't help much.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    3. Re:Can't you just put it in a sock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hi , i'm the Microsoft Kinect. I cannot see anything, please reposition me until you can see yourself in the box shown below. Microsoft xbone cannot continue until Kinect is fully functional"

    4. Re:Can't you just put it in a sock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if that's a realistic scenario. He already mentioned the sock.

    5. Re:Can't you just put it in a sock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently it needs to be connected for hte xbox to work. But can't you just put a sock over it?

      Make gesture to start game. No person detected. Awaiting input.

      [later]

      Game paused: Player not detected.

    6. Re:Can't you just put it in a sock? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Sounds like MS wants me to put it in a shoe box. :D

      There is something you can do that will render its snooping capability irrelevant. Well... aside from not buying one.

      Its a goofy bit of tech. It doesn't scare me.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    7. Re:Can't you just put it in a sock? by ryukenmaster · · Score: 1

      Hinh Sex , xnxx , Phim sex online is the beatifull all right?

  60. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bing image search doesn't enforce safe-search if you decide to turn it off (Google doesn't allow you to globally do this anymore) and has a pretty decent interface. The rest is not helpful, but image search is.

  61. Penny Arcade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. It's not advertising by BLToday · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not advertising, it's a new form of achievements.

    * Watched 100 ads in 3 hours
    * Clicked on 50 ads
    * Said "Xbox ONE, search for pizza"

    1. Re:It's not advertising by thanhtrucvip · · Score: 1

      It's not advertising, it's a new form of achievements.

      * Watched 100 ads in 3 hours * Clicked on 50 ads * Said "Xbox ONE, search for pizza"

      tai zalo tai game pikachu tai game ai la trieu phu ninja school online

    2. Re:It's not advertising by ryukenmaster · · Score: 1

      Hinh Sex , xnxx , Phim sex online is the beatifull all right?

  63. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by Dins · · Score: 2

    Bing image search doesn't enforce safe-search if you decide to turn it off (Google doesn't allow you to globally do this anymore) and has a pretty decent interface. The rest is not helpful, but image search is.

    Nudge nudge, wink wink, say no more!

  64. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    Fine, in Capitalist America, Bing searches you!

    Better?

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  65. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by jkflying · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fine, in Fascist America, Bing searches you!

    FTFY

    --
    Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
  66. Big Ballmer by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 1

    They had this in 1984. It was called a telescreen. Like the Kinect One, the telescreen can't be turned off.

  67. Ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never bought anything due to an advert and pay no attention to them whatsoever. I even switch channels on tv when they come on.

  68. ads? by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

    So I pay for the box (and the kinect camera), I pay for the game, and I even pay to get online, and yet they still shove ads to my face?

  69. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

    The Russian search engine Yandex is one of the sources for duckduckgo. We need them because they help to maintain our privacy.

  70. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, you watch television.

  71. The internet is for .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dear,
    why porn sites automaticallt showed up as soon as you looked into the monitor?"

  72. Rationality of introducing ads by kye4u · · Score: 1
    I don't particularly like ads on cable tv or video game consoles, but from a business perspective it is the rational thing to do.

    Imagine you are an executive at a company that makes a gadget that users interact with. The user pays for the gadget along with the interactive services that the gadget provides.

    Lets also suppose that the gadget is very popular and has a large user base. Being a profit-seeking individual, you as an executive come up with the genius idea of integrating ads into the gadget.

    You demonstrate that by introducing ads you can immediately impact the bottom line in a positive manner (at least in the short term). Since most businesses are short-term oriented, everyone is excited. Your genius idea is implemented and you get a bonus that is commensurate with the money your idea brings in.

    All the executives line their pocket and live happily ever after. As far as the consumers who were buying your gadget, if they eventually stop buying/using your gadget, so what. You got yours (golden parachute opens).....The end.

  73. For fuckity fucking fuck's sake by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    I've already PAID you handsomely for the console, I've PAID for the games, now you want to shove ads on my face? FUCK YOU.

    If you want me to put up with this horseshit, you need to give me something in return, like a free console, games or Live subscription. Until then, FUCK YOU.

  74. They aren't advertisements... by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    They are experience enhancements. Don't you want to be able to play the Palmolive Virtual Dishwasher Kinect game?
    Or how about the Pep Boys quick service oil change time challenge! Fun for you, you will love it!

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  75. Re: Bing, Bing, Bing! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Allowing cameras from the same company working with the feds, to film you while are naked on the sofa, is a no-no for me.

  76. Re: Bing, Bing, Bing! by jbo5112 · · Score: 1

    Bing image search gave me nude pictures of children when trying to find a picture of young Anakin Skywalker. I wouldn't recommend the service to anyone.

  77. If this were Google you'd love it by Taylor123456789 · · Score: 0

    More Microsoft bias.

    I don't think most people get it. The Xbox is not a game console, it's a media center. It plays movies through Hulu and Netflix, and Xbox Live, and will now play cable TV. The interactive ads will be through these channels, not games, duh.

  78. Goodness! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    In the future, Kinect may offer you a 'Choose Your Own Adventure' style narrative in which you speak commands or give orders to an ad as it's playing to change the final outcome.

    As long as you are not required to participate. I loathe Hulu asking you if this is a good advertising "experience for you" and refuse to click.

    Actually I don't even use Hulu anymore. Multiple 30s commercials just like TV meh. I lived through the era of broadcast-only TV where you could not fast forward thru commercials. This is no improvement, Hulu. You've returned people to the dark ages.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  79. For what it's worth by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    my hardcore Call 'o Duty friends prefer it on the XBox because the dedicated servers make a huge difference. That's really why Sony's following suit with their own version of XBL. You really do want/need dedicated servers for multiplayer. Heck, Quake 2 had them in what, 1995...?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:For what it's worth by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the problem with dedicated servers is they ALWAYS fuck you in the end, take any EA game from as little as 4 years ago and YOU CAN'T PLAY MP because they have turned them off, they are ALL dead, whereas I can fire up Team Fortress Classic right now and be rocking a DM with the max number of players in less than 3 minutes.

      So you really are getting ripped off for that convenience friend, if they wrote decent software you wouldn't NEED dedicated servers because the ones you ran would run just great. again you should try something like TF Classic or Counter Strike Classic (hell they are like less than $5 and will run on pretty much anything now) and see the difference, you can host a game with a dozen players even on a shitty DSL line and on anything decent you can be rockin' with as many guys as the software will take. How many of your CoD games will even run now? 2? 3? Probably not even 30% of the CoD games can even be played online anymore, it really is a scam to keep you always buying new copies.

      BTW I wouldn't get too attached to CoD friend, because i wouldn't be surprised if in their infinite greed they end up going to a WoW style subscription, they know they have a captive audience and their CEO is a major douchebag so don't be surprised if you buy a CoD for the Xbone and then fire it up only to be told to break out your wallet. after all one of the patents MSFT filed on the Xbone was based on offering subscriptions and micropayments instantly on the console. Don't trust 'em dude, you will regret it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re: For what it's worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those games don't use dedicated servers on 360 either. The vast majority of multiplayer games on 360 and PS3 are peer to peer. So your friends really are paying for nothing.

    3. Re:For what it's worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call of Duty doesn't have dedicated servers on Xbox. Your friends are idiots and you should probably find new friends.

  80. Commands for ads by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    Kinect may offer you a 'Choose Your Own Adventure' style narrative in which you speak commands or give orders to an ad as it's playing to change the final outcome.

    I'm thinking skip or some variation of f-word will be the more common commands issued when ads appear.

  81. No... by OldSport · · Score: 1

    Microsoft knows that most gamers really won't give a shit. FFS, people generally don't give a shit about ANYTHING these days aside from who died in the latest Game of Thrones and how many times Justin Bieber puked on stage. We've been slowly conditioned over the past few decades to care less and less about this stuff. There will be no uproar.

  82. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    informative +1

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  83. Re:Bing, Bing, Bing! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If you told anyone three decades ago that you'd have to turn to Russia as a US citizen if you wanted liberty and privacy...

    The times sure are a'changing.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  84. I can see it now. by godxile · · Score: 1

    Come play my lord.

  85. Family Sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't need to reintroduce Family Sharing to get the console back on track. It will have the feature already. Just hand your game DVD to a family member and let them play it on the system.

  86. in and out again by dewrox · · Score: 1

    Ok after the whole backing off of the crap they were going to do with the Xbox One I was in and was going to get one. Now I am out again. I don't want ads, I hate them on tv, I really hate them on the internet, but I refuse to be bombarded with them on a console.

  87. XBOX LIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Microsoft will likely learn that telling gamers that the Xbox One is an ad-centric experience and attempting to spin it like a positive doesn't actually work."

    It worked for XBOXLive, so well they get people to actually pay for it. I think this will work well too, they aim mostly at kids and frankly kids are pretty dumb (ie - the success of XBOXLive).

  88. Swing and a miss by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Strike 3, yer out!

    Xbox One, I didn't even get to know you.

    Xbox One RIP
    2013 (mid) - 2013 (late-mid)

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.