Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's New Smart Bra Could Stop You From Over Eating

walterbyrd writes "A team of engineers at Microsoft Research have developed a high-tech bra that's intended to monitor women's stress levels and dissuade them from emotional over-eating. The undergarment has sensors that track the user's heart rate, respiration, skin conductance and movement — all of which can indicate the type of stressful emotions that lead to over-eating, according to Microsoft researchers. The data is sent to a smartphone app, which then alerts users about their mood."

299 comments

  1. shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm hungry!

    1. Re:shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thank god the project manager and senior researchers are women.

      Can you imagine the backlash from the feminist community should a man be anywhere near the top of a project focused on getting women to eat less?

    2. Re:shut up you stupid app by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm hungry!

      Hi, I'm your bra assistant. It looks like you are hungry. Would you like some diet advice?
      (o) Yes (o) no.

      At least that'd explain Clippy's pervert-on-the-playground look...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:shut up you stupid app by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      I'm just waiting for the smart bro

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:shut up you stupid app by EdIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude... I'm dying over here.

      That would be the perfect user interface design for such a device. Nipple.Navigation(tm)

    5. Re:shut up you stupid app by narcc · · Score: 2

      Manzier!

    6. Re:shut up you stupid app by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      Does it work on man tits?

    7. Re:shut up you stupid app by gorehog · · Score: 2

      Squeeze left for yes, right to cancel.

    8. Re:shut up you stupid app by gorehog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gives a whole new meaning to TouchPoint.

    9. Re:shut up you stupid app by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Over the shoulder bro-ulder holder!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    10. Re:shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well hello, my name is Clippy!

      I really like the way you turn me on!

      Grrrrrrrowwwwow!

    11. Re:shut up you stupid app by dimeglio · · Score: 2

      I'm sure they do. They were probably designed with Ballmer in mind.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    12. Re:shut up you stupid app by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

      Wait 'till you see the male jockstrap version. I hear they're calling it .NUT.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    13. Re:shut up you stupid app by drkim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nipple.Navigation(tm)

      I can imagine the headline now:

      "Apple sues Microsoft over smart bra. Claims rounded bra corners and white color violate design patents."

    14. Re:shut up you stupid app by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      shut up you stupid app ... I'm hungry!

      What's wrong? You hungry bra?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    15. Re:shut up you stupid app by Shoten · · Score: 1

      Dude... I'm dying over here.

      That would be the perfect user interface design for such a device. Nipple.Navigation(tm)

      Except if they let the Windows 8 team design the interface, they'd misinterpret the requirements and you'd have to softly caress a pair of hairy balls instead.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    16. Re:shut up you stupid app by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Man Bewbs!
      If ya gotta see some dude with bewbs, they probably oughta be pushed together for some cleavage to match his caboose.
      Makes sense, donut?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    17. Re:shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bra 8.1 will have touch interface then.

    18. Re:shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a joke about a corporation, are you really that attached? If so, then you're a fucking loser.

    19. Re:shut up you stupid app by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Honk honk. Sorry command was not understood. Please squeeze left for yes OR right to cancel.

    20. Re:shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict an increase of over-eating, since being continuously nagged by your smart phone adds to the stress level.

    21. Re:shut up you stupid app by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the fucked-up settings after a nice night with the boyfriend/girlfriend? Twenty apps open, desktop rearranged into total chaos, and you're about to send a mail containing "afaguhiho;agehgisuaffgasf butts" to the CEO of Microsoft.

    22. Re:shut up you stupid app by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how unreasonable for feminists to want women in charge of beauty standards for women!

      It's almost as bad as having black people developing and marketing those African hair straightening products!

      Furthermore, I bet feminists have literally nothing to say about this product since women are involved - we all know that they have never ever criticized other women for participating in antifeminist stuff.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    23. Re:shut up you stupid app by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you were modded funny. We all know that it will turn out to be +informative.

    24. Re:shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TouchPoint? Those are nicknamed clit mice. No wonder you're still a /. virgin. You're in the wrong neighborhood!

    25. Re:shut up you stupid app by drkim · · Score: 1
    26. Re:shut up you stupid app by drkim · · Score: 1

      It's a joke about a corporation, are you really that attached? If so, then you're a fucking loser.

      (Yeah, wow... those apple folk sure are sensitive! I'm glad now I didn't go with that: "fanboi/boob" joke I originally wrote!)

    27. Re: shut up you stupid app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a stupid flaccid troglodyte. Go away.

    28. Re: shut up you stupid app by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      You must be a fat chick...

      ;)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. The blue tits of death. by quonsar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time to reboob.

    1. Re:The blue tits of death. by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with that....

    2. Re:The blue tits of death. by sudo · · Score: 1

      more like blue nipples of death.

    3. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Never thought Microsoft Support would be uplifting.

    4. Re:The blue tits of death. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Sags you very much.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mann, we told you again and again not to chocke your girl...

    6. Re:The blue tits of death. by girlintraining · · Score: 0

      Time to reboob.

      What's surprising is that nobody here thinks this is an inherently sexist device. Don't men suffer from overeating as well? What about a jock strap that monitors them? Eating disorders are not strictly a female problem, and technology that is unisex has, at least in my experience, fared far better in the market place. How successful has Microsoft been at developing a computer "for women"? It hasn't been. It's a terrible and stupid idea; just like designing a car "for women" has been in that industry.

      Attaching the device to a bra would be alright, but integrating it into it pretty much spells its doom on the market. About the only thing that's marketed to women I buy besides clothing is deodorant... because for some very strange reason, men seem to enjoy smelling like they swam through a high school chemistry lab's discarded waste.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    7. Re:The blue tits of death. by gorehog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe it's just easiest to detect emotional distress in women's breasts? Maybe it's harder to find a place on a male body that gives the same feedback that is already in contact with a piece of clothing? This might just be the low-hanging fruit.

      Yes. I typed that.

    8. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's surprising is that nobody here thinks this is an inherently sexist device.

      It's not really that surprising when you think about it.

      Men don't like fat chicks. Chicks don't like fat chicks. Fat chicks don't like being fat. Fat guys on the other hand don't care too much until the point at which they can't see their penis, and even then, most people around them don't care either. Why? Because society holds women up to the pedestal of beauty - not men. This has been the case for eons - there's a reason why supermodels are always women.

      Is that sexist? That would imply that the whole of society is sexist. I think at this point though the only people who'd complain are those women who don't shave their armpits/pubes and wonder why no-one wants to fuck them.

    9. Re:The blue tits of death. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any women who do not where a bra. I also know of no men that wear a jock strap, except in sports. Hell, half of the people I know don't wear underwear. This is a solution tucked into an everyday use item, not a shoehorn solution that is tedious to carry or remember to wear.

      I also think you need to accept that women are biologically different than men. It is a fact, not sexism. We produce and secrete different hormones in different places in different situations. Men tend to be stronger because they can grow muscles due to testosterone production. Women tend to grow breasts due to estrogen production. That is just how it is.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    10. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you stop being stupid. What is the bra near to that your jock strap far away from? You haven't even read the article before going on with your typical feminist waaah waaah privilege tirade.

    11. Re:The blue tits of death. by plover · · Score: 1

      It's biomechanics, not sexism. If you accept that women wear bras, it's in a perfect position to take an EKG reading. Men don't ordinarily wear a form-fitting piece of clothing in the same place.

      If you want the same benefits for a man's physiology, think about the many chest-strap heart-rate monitors in the marketplace today. Can they comfortably carry the same amount of electronics and batteries? No. So in your world where this is "sexist", does that mean women should be denied this tool because it isn't equally available to both genders?

      This device is no more or less sexist than the clothing that already exists.

      --
      John
    12. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that sexist? That would imply that the whole of society is sexist.

      Yes. Yes, it would.

      I think at this point though the only people who'd complain are those women who don't shave their armpits/pubes [...]

      ...and so would this.

    13. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that sexist? That would imply that the whole of society is sexist.

      I didn't really think it was controversial to say that the whole of society is sexist (including both men and women, and including men and women who try to be conscious and conscientious about sexism), with exactly the reason you laid out as one piece of evidence.

    14. Re:The blue tits of death. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      How successful has Microsoft been at developing a computer "for women"?

      Apple did pretty well with the Macbook.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Macbook isn't a computer developed for women. It's a computer developed developed specifically to address the common complaints that people have about typical, poorly built and poorly thought-out PC laptops. In that sense the Macbook is developed for everyone.

    16. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a terrible and stupid idea; just like designing a car "for women" has been in that industry.

      Oh, I don't know, Volkswagen has been pretty successful.

    17. Re:The blue tits of death. by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Do manboobs require a different kind of bra, or what prevents men from wearing these too? I mean, just because there are more braless men than women does not make this sexist. Are you discriminating against men who wear bras?

    18. Re:The blue tits of death. by turtledawn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Polar actually sells a sports bra version of their heart rate monitor strap. It's a brilliant idea, because wearing the strap under a sports bra isn't really all that pleasant. Lots of us do it, but it sort of sucks. You still have to attach the actual monitor with the transmitter and battery to the bra, but the electrodes and wiring are built in.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    19. Re:The blue tits of death. by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      This works for men. The fact that you have to wear a bra causes enough shame that you stop eating.

    20. Re:The blue tits of death. by Urkki · · Score: 1

      We produce and secrete different hormones in different places in different situations. Men tend to be stronger because they can grow muscles due to testosterone production. Women tend to grow breasts due to estrogen production. That is just how it is.

      ...and then there are the shot put and hammer throw athletes of indeterminate gender, predominantly (but not exclusively) hailing from so the called communist countries and competing in women's series.

    21. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Czerwinski explained that her team tried to develop an underwear version for men, but it didn’t end up working because underwear is located too far away from the heart." Straight from the article. I know nobody reads them these days, but you could at least try to read three paragraphs in before commenting. That sounds much less interesting than trying to turn this into a sexism debate though.

    22. Re:The blue tits of death. by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Funny

      Never thought Microsoft Support would be uplifting.

      Depends if you're wireless or not.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    23. Re:The blue tits of death. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Don't men suffer from overeating as well?

      Yes we do, the difference is we don't feel guilty about it. The bra is "working" on the same (unreliable) principle that a lie detector uses, if there is no stress from guilt/fear/whatever then the bra won't detect anything.The idea that someone needs an app to tell them "what mood their in" strikes me as more having a lot more comedic potential than commercial potential, although it maybe a big hit with the Japanese sub-culture that sees impractical inventions as some kind of performance art.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    24. Re:The blue tits of death. by cr_nucleus · · Score: 1

      I agree that this implicitly says that only women have eating disorders.

      On the other hand, it is possible that mainly women are concerned (isn't that the case for anorexia?) so it could somewhat make sense.
      Anyone with proper references ?

    25. Re:The blue tits of death. by rioki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How expensive is this "bra"? How many can you buy without ruining yourself? Do they wash well? Are there different shapes? Can you change the strap configuration? How about matching panties?

      I am just a guy and have come up with a bunch of problems without actually touching the issue of sexism. I sort of see the appeal of integrating something into every day use, but it starts to get difficult with items that you change regularly and have a reasonable large amount of.

    26. Re:The blue tits of death. by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Don't men suffer from overeating as well?

      It probably works with moobs as well.

    27. Re:The blue tits of death. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Yes, men's deodorant is really repulsive as a rule. Fortunately not any men use any....

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    28. Re:The blue tits of death. by gweihir · · Score: 0

      Bah, facts! Don't mess up a stupid discussion with facts! For some reason neo-feminists have regressed below the age when children realize that the sexes have different bodies.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    29. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know they where homosexual?

    30. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to reboob.

      What's surprising is that nobody here thinks this is an inherently sexist device. Don't men suffer from overeating as well? What about a jock strap that monitors them?

      I think your confused. If a woman designed a similar garment for men you can rest assured it would monitor sexual arousal and quickly deliver an electric shock to "encourage" a reduction is his chubby. And probably be remotely controllable if the man is married.

    31. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, let bra for men, huh?

    32. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know they where homosexual?

      The answer to your question is self-explanatory and says more about the person to whom you are replying and their sexual orientation or biases. Unless, of course, all males in San Franciso are homosexual. Oh wait! LOL

    33. Re:The blue tits of death. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Men have low-hanging fruit too. Even lower hanging than women.

    34. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      athletes of indeterminate gender, predominantly (but not exclusively) hailing from so the called communist countries

      Hail, Hail, Robonia...

    35. Re:The blue tits of death. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      About the only thing that's marketed to women I buy besides clothing is deodorant... because for some very strange reason, men seem to enjoy smelling like they swam through a high school chemistry lab's discarded waste.

      Sounds like you're thinking of Lynx. That brand surely is a triumph of marketing over any sort of higher brain function. There are many advertisments including imagery of women falling at the feet of the hapless guy wearing Lynx. What the advertisments don't tell you is that the falling is actually collapsing due to suffocation from the smell.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    36. Re:The blue tits of death. by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sigh.

      On behalf of men everywhere, I'd just like to point out that not everyone is as inappropriately horny or stupid as this guy. Or at least, if we are, we try to keep quiet about it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    37. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They were using a Mac.

    38. Re:The blue tits of death. by discord5 · · Score: 1

      What's surprising is that nobody here thinks this is an inherently sexist device.

      In before the great bra-burning of 2014.

    39. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, keep in mind that anyone in need of losing weight will also have need of a bra. As for hysterical overeating, I'm not sure I know of anyone that does that. But surely having a bra that screams "You're going to get fat! You'll never find a good husband now!" whenever the wearer gets stressed out can only be a positive force in this topsy-turvy confusing world.

      Regarding deodorant, I think I'm typical in that I try to buy the least-smelly option. Men apparently have a less keen sense of smell than women, which may explain why what I blithely put on makes a woman's nostrils burn. But if you think that's bad, just compare what I would smell like otherwise... I mean, I'm a busy man, I don't have time to shower! Just slather some right guard on yesterday's clothes and go go go!

    40. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hell, half of the people I know don't wear underwear.

      Oh no. Now I started wondering how you knew about that in the first place.

    41. Re:The blue tits of death. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Your assumption that this Bra is sexist is sexist in the extreme.

      Have you no consideration that anyone in the target market, man or woman, will be able to fill out one of these bras just fine?

      When you have Moobs, there are going to be a LOT OF mood alerts.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    42. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's surprising is that nobody here thinks this is an inherently sexist device.

      No, that is not surprising. Bras aren't sexist just because only women wear them. And so, a bra with some electronics thrown in is not sexist either. Further - a man can wear an a-cup if he so desires, or remove the electronics and install the sensors in a t-shirt. If this bra is "sexist", then all female clothing is sexist. Why is there almost no pretty man-sized dresses? sexism! sexism!

      Don't men suffer from overeating as well?

      Not as much, no! Men generally has less taste for sugar, and enjoy a good workout more. And when we occationally find a need to loose weight, we are much better at sticking to a diet until the goal is reached.

    43. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they found the bra approach "more sexy". Probably invented by a man who donesn't get much. "Hmm, sensor error again. Please take the device off again for recalibration..."

      Captcha "immature" . . .

    44. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The feminists wish to have a talk with you. Any suggestion that women are different from men is heresy.

      Actual feminists don't say that. Men who are constructing straw-man arguments say that.

    45. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't work in a hospital.
      Doctors tend to be Mac people, and make doctors, especially surgeons, are among the most hetero/macho people on the planet.
      Female surgeons are almost as extreme as the males.
      That is, except for the ones that are actually homosexuals, and even those tend to be over-testosteroned.

    46. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man? Youre not a man, not with adolescent chat-room sighs.

      Horny is appropriate always and there is nothing wrong with that. The day men need someone like you to apologize for us...

    47. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're even worse than GP. You're trying to cock block and be the white knight coming to the rescue of the damsel in distress.

      Just like GP, you ain't going to get any because there are no chicks on the internet.

    48. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they malfunctioned and caught fire?

    49. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you try turning her off and then back on again?

    50. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hail, Hail, Robonia...

      A land I didn't make up.

    51. Re:The blue tits of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Jiangshi ever!

      *hop hop hop*

    52. Re:The blue tits of death. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as inappropriately horny. Just inappropriate reactions to how horny you are.

    53. Re:The blue tits of death. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, shit.

      I'm going to write that one down...

    54. Re:The blue tits of death. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The Macbook isn't a computer developed for women.

      There's a term for men who use Macbooks:

      "pre-op".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    55. Re:The blue tits of death. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Men don't like fat chicks. Chicks don't like fat chicks. Fat chicks don't like being fat.

      This is somewhat of an over generalization, wouldn't you say?
      There are certainly men who like fat chicks. There are certainly chicks who like being fat.
      Just because *you* don't like fat chicks, doesn't mean that there aren't men out there who like their women with curves.

      So, pardon my french, but....fuck you and your fat shaming.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    56. Re:The blue tits of death. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Not really, I've just seen too many feminist posts on FB recently. The only one doing any cock blocking was himself. Plus lower UID people here are usually way older than me, and probably married.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    57. Re:The blue tits of death. by DeathToThePatriarchy · · Score: 1
      Which could have been used to monitor heart health, which would be useful. Same freaking data, saving lives instead of shaming/guilting women. Who would think that was valuable?

      eyeroll

    58. Re:The blue tits of death. by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      I've been a member since 1999, but thanks for playing.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
  3. They really know the geek market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many of us guys that visit Slashdot could use a bra. Too bad it doesn't run Linux.

    1. Re:They really know the geek market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      stuff a raspberry pi into it

    2. Re:They really know the geek market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      My problem is that using Windows 8 tends to bunch up my panties.

    3. Re:They really know the geek market by gorehog · · Score: 1

      Yep, well, if you're a guy wearing a bra then you know you already need to stop eating.

    4. Re:They really know the geek market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of us guys that visit Slashdot could use a bra. Too bad it doesn't come with a woman already inside it.

      FTFY

    5. Re:They really know the geek market by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Yep, well, if you're a guy wearing a bra then you know you already need to stop eating.

      Operant conditioning..... if you eat anyways... embarrasing pictures of you will be posted as Tweets and Facebook status updates.

    6. Re:They really know the geek market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trust me... plenty of pies have been stuffed in there.

    7. Re:They really know the geek market by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Yep, well, if you're a guy wearing a bra then you know you already need to stop eating.

      People who stop eating will spend the last few weeks of their life cranky, miserable and with a headache. Generally not recommended.

    8. Re:They really know the geek market by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Funny

      stuff a raspberry pi into it

      Stuffing pie is what it is trying to prevent. That would be self-negating.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:They really know the geek market by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      No they need a bro.

    10. Re:They really know the geek market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how that works....lesbian gymnasts?

  4. Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming market by tylikcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm actually pretty amused by the sensor rigged bra - heck, I wear a bra to run in anyway, way better than a separate heart rate monitor. Though no proprietary MS crap for me ;-) (Can't imagine they provide decent support, y'know?)

    But it seems horribly tone deaf to decide to put their sensors in a bra, and then make the whole thing be about dieting. Please folks, try not to be assholes.

  5. And for the Facebook Stalkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And for a price, Microsoft will let you look on googlemaps for GPS signals and sort by cup sizes.

  6. I can just see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Mam, I'm not sure how to put this, but...your breasts are acting rather erratically at the moment..."
    "Ugh, not again. I'm wearing a Microsoft bra. It has to be restarted every few hours or strange things happen."

    1. Re:I can just see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*...it just isn't funny anymore as we all know Linux is the one which crashes more these days... :-/

    2. Re:I can just see it... by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      It's better than Arch Bra, which is two metres of lycra spandex and a spool of cotton.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    3. Re:I can just see it... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Aehm, no?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:I can just see it... by rts008 · · Score: 2

      * Adjusts bra strap*
      *Audio message plays*

      "You will need to reboob Windows Bra for the changes to take effect....Reboob now? Cancel?"

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  7. Headline requires an explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this going to stop (the Slashdot reader) from over eating?

  8. What about the bro/manssiere version? by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Steve Ballmer could model it.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  9. A hack that pays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your current mood: horny. Why don't you try fucking that guy in the sunglasses in the corner?"

    I know, sounds juvenile. But if people are going to let their GPS apps lead them onto airport runways, you never know...

    1. Re:A hack that pays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bra, rank the men in this room by income and indicate the highest earner."
      "Working. ... The barista is the highest earning man."
      "Damn! Why did I come to a coffee shop full of losers."
      "Insufficient data."
      "Bra, indicate the highest earner in this room."
      "Working. ... The highest earner is the woman in the red dress."
      "Income?"
      "$80000."
      "Bra, am I still horny?"
      "Affirmative."
      "What the hell, she is kinda cute....."

    2. Re:A hack that pays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you're going to get any child support payments out of her...

  10. Title Pedant by hedgemage · · Score: 2

    I'm really curious how a bra will stop me (a man) from over eating. Maybe the title (lol, tit) should be "Microsoft's New Smart Bra Could Stop Women From Overeating".

    1. Re:Title Pedant by lakeland · · Score: 2

      It could stop you from over-eating. You might happen to choose not to wear one for various reasons, such as an A cup being too big and thereby making it uncomfortable.

      However I don't see why the title is inaccurate just because you are not interested

    2. Re:Title Pedant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you have over eating problem already you could probably fit one of the smaller cup sizes

    3. Re:Title Pedant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheer embarrassment?

    4. Re:Title Pedant by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well, nicotine patches can stop people from smoking . . . so maybe someone just needs to invent "food patches" . . . ? You know, just peel of the back paper, stick it on your shoulder, and the patch oozes some goo into you that makes you feel like you just gorged yourself on a deep-fried turkey. In bras, of course.

      Maybe the hardware in the Microsoft bra gives you electric shocks that create the same gorged feeling?

      Hmmm . . . do you really want to use the word "Micro" when talking about something for a female's tits . . . ? It might be taken in the wrong way. I'm not quite sure about the "soft" part either.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re: Title Pedant by nbritton · · Score: 1

      We had food patches, people stopped eating, among other things, so they banned them.

    6. Re:Title Pedant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really curious how a bra will stop me (a man) from over eating.

      Maybe there's the husband mode so the bra wore by your wife screams at you when lifting a donut.

    7. Re:Title Pedant by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I'm really curious how a bra will stop me (a man) from over eating.

      It interfaces with Google Glass. Whenever she looks at a fat guy, a little sign pops up from between her boobs that says, "I don't date fat guys".

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    8. Re:Title Pedant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really curious how a bra will stop me (a man) from over eating.

      I think a bra on the right woman would stop me...

  11. Wouldn't it work better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it offered tactile feedback instead of beaming data to a smart phone?

    You know, when it goes outside of the established parameters it shocks the user...

    1. Re:Wouldn't it work better... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      You know, when it goes outside of the established parameters it shocks the user...

      I was thinking more along the lines of: "activates mag locks", sealing your refrigerators, freezers, pantry, and cupboard doors for a few hours, until you are in a better mood.

    2. Re:Wouldn't it work better... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      if it offered tactile feedback instead of beaming data to a smart phone?

      You know, when it goes outside of the established parameters it shocks the user...

      Shocking will only worsen the stress... but, hang on... the idea is still salvageable.
      I'd reckon a more pleasant type of stimulation would better help in releasing endorphins and combat the adrenaline excess induced by stress. This approach may come with the advantages of:
      # being adaptable outside the "bra only" range;
      # may induce other type of releases - which the body will consume energy to replace.

      (granted, using shocks may still work for some parts of the population enjoying alt.sex...)

      (ducks)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:Wouldn't it work better... by plopez · · Score: 1

      "Open the refrigerator door HAL"
      "I'm sorry Dave I can't do that"
      "I just want a snack"
      "You've been getting chunky lately. Why not have a nice carrot stick?"

      etc.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  12. clippy returns as a qualified nutritionist by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    it looks like you're eating a doughnut...

    --
    John_Chalisque
  13. Seinfeld: The Bro, aka the Manssiere by theodp · · Score: 2

    Frank: "You want me to wear a bra?" Kramer: "No. A bra is for ladies. Meet...the Bro." Maybe Bill Gates can get licensing rights for Microsoft from his pal Jerry Seinfeld. :-)

  14. They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Damn it to hell.

    Fat shreds memory and cognitive function, in often imperceptible ways but the effects do build over time. It increases an individual's chances of acquiring diabetes, heart disease and a number of other maladies. It is responsible for increased fatigue and reduces the efficacy of the immune system. People suffering from obesity, and that term applies much sooner than most would like it to, tend to be less productive, cost their family and employers more, and die sooner.

    No, it is not appropriate to attempt shame someone over it. No, it is not justifiable to treat the individual as less than any other. This I am most decidedly against. However, fat is not something to be "accepted" as if it were a lifestyle choice; even if the war is never won, the individual should always fight. Regardless of the origin, be it stress, overeating, hormone imbalance, etc. Fat is something to fight. It is a medical condition and infinitely treatable.

    It's one thing when a man, or woman, is bound to a wheelchair for life due to a condition one cannot correct from birth or from an injury or from disease. It would be quite another if that man, or woman, is bound to a wheelchair because they refused to do the physical therapy. I mean, we would all give the person their space after whatever event brought them to that point. We would all give them time. But at some point, you would lose respect for them, wouldn't you? Their apathy would be off-putting. Now imagine they wanted you to "just accept it".

    The individual who is fighting deserves all the respect the individual who has won should receive. I would never grant the individual who refuses to fight that and nor should you. As for the fight, this bra is simply a tool to aid, in however limited way it may, that battle. It is not fat shaming. They're trying to help; they're not being assholes.

    I say this as someone who has spent a lifetime fighting, and my war rages on.

    1. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Fat is something to fight. "

      ...Might I recommend ketosis?

    2. Re:They're not being assholes! by tylikcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The being assholes bit is presenting this in a way exclusively aimed at women when women already face a great deal more scrutiny over their physical appearances (and much higher rates of eating disorders and the like). The sensor suite isn't the problem. I can even see the bra-mount as being useful, because hey, men aren't already wearing a strap around their chests. (And as I said, it has struck me as kind of annoying that a heart rate monitor is an additional strap around my chest when I am already wearing at least one.)

      But the presentation is hugely tone deaf, in that it plays into existing stereotypes in harmful ways. You remember being told that computers could be for women too - hey, I bet you could keep recipes on one, right? (Or perhaps that was before your time.) If you're going to make a product aimed at helping people not stress eat, for heaven's sake don't make it only for women. Especially considering all the pressure for women to stay thin specifically so they look good for men (as opposed to for reasons of health.) It might be assholery through cluelessness, but it's still assholery.

    3. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      FTFA: "Czerwinski explained that her team tried to develop an underwear version for men, but it didn’t end up working because underwear is located too far away from the heart."
       
      Thanks for reading, asshole.

    4. Re:They're not being assholes! by tylikcat · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was a software engineer at Microsoft from 1995-2002. So while my comments are indeed biased (and really, the first four years were an awful lot of fun, even if I did have to work with windows, but it is not a work experience I would want to return to) they also reflect a fair bit of personal experience.

      But more the point, the potential product, as presented, isn't useful to me. Might be to other people, can't speak for them. I find the idea of an instrumented bra interesting. (Or, rather, instruments that would attach to an existing bra. I'm picky about my bras, and they have to hold up to running and martial arts.) The app they're using it for? Not so much.

      For me to be interested in it, I would want access to the raw data, and to be able to hack it. I don't pretend my case is likely to be that common. But without those features, meh. There are hackable heartrate monitors available, and that'll do more of what I care about.

    5. Re:They're not being assholes! by gorehog · · Score: 1

      "Fat shreds memory and cognitive function"

      Can you cite a source for this?

    6. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you cite a source for this?

      Again? I already told you, like, five minutes ago.

    7. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're referring to meal-master? http://episoft.home.comcast.net/~episoft/

    8. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... If you're going to make a product aimed at helping people not stress eat, for heaven's sake don't make it only for women. Especially considering all the pressure for women to stay thin specifically so they look good for men (as opposed to for reasons of health.) It might be assholery through cluelessness, but it's still assholery.

      Yes, how wrong of them to only target those that have proven vanity (driven by individual or society) is the highest amongst all creatures on this planet.

      Ironically, your own response says volumes as to exactly why they targeted women, but I suppose I should be all up on arms when I walk into Sephora because those clueless bitches only carry a handful of items targeted for men. How fucking rude.

      And if you're staying thin to only appease men, well then you've got bigger issues to contend with. That's shit that little girls do. I want a woman who goes to the gym and maintains a healthy body for themselves. Attracting men should be a side effect to that, not the main goal.

      Grow up.

    9. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... Especially considering all the pressure for women to stay thin specifically so they look good for men (as opposed to for reasons of health.)...

      As a man I'd like to dispute this point. I highly doubt there are many men who would prefer the skeleton thin women that Hollywood and the fashion industry pushes onto us. Men want a woman, not a tub of lard, but not a boy-like walking matchstick. I much prefer, say, Scarlet Johanssen or Jennifer Love Hewitt, even if they put on a few pounds, than someone like Miley Cyrus or Keira Knightley or Natalie Portman. Blech. When I look at magazine covers at checkout lines, rarely do I go "mmm", most of the time I go "eww". My choice of wife reflects that :). For true male ideals of female attractiveness, perhaps it's best to look at porn stars instead of movie stars :) I don't think you'll find many successful anorexic pornstars, but quite a few buxom ones.

      From man to woman, can I ask this: Is it men who pressure women to stay thin, or is it actually other women? Is it how women keep score, similar how to men compare wallets? I've read somewhere that women dress up and put on makeup not for men, but for other women. Is "thinness" the same?

    10. Re:They're not being assholes! by gorehog · · Score: 1

      Ha. Ha. I'm serious though. I'm wondering if my obesity is really affecting my cognitive functions.

    11. Re:They're not being assholes! by gorehog · · Score: 2
    12. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but you sound fat

    13. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh gosh well that changes everything.

    14. Re: They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason the models are boy-like are that all men working in the fashion industry are gay.
      So it never reflects what normal men would want to see.
      (Yes I said normal, bu hu)

    15. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The app they're using it for? Not so much.

      But it's an application they can be right for 100% of the time. It's supposed to detect if you're eating because you're depressed or stressed. Well, since it probably only runs on a Windows phone, they already know you're depressed and stressed because of that, so all it needs to detect then is if you're eating.

    16. Re:They're not being assholes! by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      I mentioned this in a comment above, but Polar makes a heart rate monitor sports bra. You still need the actual Polar monitor. Depending on what HRM you've got you may want to look into it.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    17. Re:They're not being assholes! by LiamKelly · · Score: 1

      Well, that says obesity only affects cognitive function in men, which means the product from TFA doesn't actually address that problem.

    18. Re: They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is the preferred fuel of the heart outside of fatty acids.

      http://hazard.com/msds/mf/baker/baker/files/a0446.htm

    19. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try love, not war

    20. Re:They're not being assholes! by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 2

      considering all the pressure for women to stay thin specifically so they look good for men

      With all due respect, don't blame me for your problems. If you want to accomplish something useful, start ignoring the stereotypes.

      Don't sit around bitching about how much time you spend trying to make yourself look good to men then complain when a company creates products to fulfill your obsession. Men aren't your problem, you are.

    21. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The being assholes bit is presenting this in a way exclusively aimed at women when women already face a great deal more scrutiny over their physical appearances (and much higher rates of eating disorders and the like).

      Those women with body-image issues are their target market. There aren't as many men with body-image issues, so they don't bother targeting them.

      This is an interesting feedback effect: the excess of women with body-image issues means that companies, for purely economic reasons, market products like this specifically to women. And, because these products are marketed specifically to them, women are more likely to develop body-image issues.

    22. Re:They're not being assholes! by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      There is pressure for women to stay thin to please men. That's not the only source of pressure, and it is more complicated, especially since women now have other career options than marrying well (in which case women competed with eachother a lot, but with an end goal in large part of attracting the right kind of male attention). But it persists. Certainly it is generally assumed that a woman's primary source of attraction for a mate is her appearance in a way that is not nearly so true for men. And women's appearance tends to be randomly discussed even when not really relevant to the subject at hand. ...and in my experience, men are not a monolithic entity who all like the same thing, though, yes, the combination of being fairly fit but still having significant breasts and a higher hip to waist ratio seems to be a popular type.

      (To be fair, my personal experience is that the more conventionally feminine I look, the more I get attention from random strangers who are often jerks. In that sense, when I was dealing with a spine injury and carrying some extra weight I enjoyed a measure of invisibility, and the people who were interested in me were usually pretty cool - and I've never been one to sit around passively and wait for someone to express interest, for that matter. I vastly prefer my leaner fitter self now, but dear gods, it appears that some men just see me and something in the back of their minds says "This one wil bear healthy children... who will never go hungry!" I've tried to adjust my presentation to deflect that kind of response, but the whole thing is pretty irritating.)

      Fashion... is special. I don't think the majority of women who are trying to be thin are trying to take it to that extreme... but really, I don't get it. (And this despite having friends involved in the fashion industry as photographers.)

    23. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFA: "Czerwinski explained that her team tried to develop an underwear version for men, but it didn’t end up working because underwear is located too far away from the heart."

      Thanks for reading, asshole.

      A sport shirt version would have worked just fine. Too bad they're not trying hard enough to consider such an idea.

    24. Re: They're not being assholes! by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, and we know that "normal" invariably means one of the following:

      1. Usual (as opposed to "correct").
      2. Gaussian.
      3. Orthogonal to the tangent space.

      In context, only the first one makes sense here.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    25. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the thing to fight is our wacko diet which requires the body to produce insane and unnatural quantities of insulin to process the glucose which is liberated by maltase lysing starches like found in most cheap western foods.
      Insulin and glucose are supposed to be used sparingly by the body, a handfull of berries while hunting, ideally the small amount of glucose required by the brain is produced from protein that you eat.
      Most people feel great living on ketotic metabolism and they avoid all of the nasty heart clogging glop because they burn it instead while enjoying their fill of coffee, wine, eggs, steak, seafood, milk, butter, and cheese. They just cant gorge on donuts, cake, bread and cereal though an occasional small carb treat once or twice a week is fine if exercise precedes or follows.

    26. Re:They're not being assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What instruments would you be interested in? Heart rate and respiration are easy and obvious (the MS bra has these) and probably lung expansion should be measurable, the MS one has skin conduction and unspecified "movement"; the location might allow a reasonable estimate of core temperature and I wonder if blood pressure can be measured. I'm sure there's more that can be done but the power and space budgets are tight and I can't think of more off the top of my head. The whole thing can only be a few mm thick and must follow the rib cage comfortably.

      Battery is an interesting problem, where to put it and what shape. For larger cups there's usually space for a decent cell below each but someone like I imagine you to be will have less depth to hide them which means either conformal cells or somewhere else to hide them. What do you think of a cell 60x40x5mm under each arm? That allows 100ma for between 12 and 16 hours depending on cell age. Of course power could be remote but then you run into the problem of trailing wires.

      Sensors required are EKG or transducer for heart rate, a strain gauge for chest expansion, two if we add one around the abdomen. GSR or similar for skin conduction. Don't expect there's anything to be gained by an accelerometer, but it could be fun to see.

      Hah, CAPTCHA=surveys

    27. Re:They're not being assholes! by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      Heart rate, respiration, O2 blood saturation, skin conduction (okay, I'm not saying I know what I use it for, but it would be fun to play with - back in my teens this is one of the things we used for a biofeedback mouse...) I wonder if you could pull out a good proxy for hydration? You'd probably have to tune it to the individual... Blood pressure would be neat, but difficult, I think. (At least compared to how it is conventionally taken.)

      I'd be tempted to build an MP3 player into while I was at it. Always a bit of a pain to haul tunes around while running. (Of course, really, I want data connectivity and maybe a little more brains, but that might be superfluous. Some of my sports bras already have a pocket for my phone.)

      On a purely personal level, I have no lack of cup space - there were some weird hormone fluctuations during the whole spine injury thing, and at the end of things I lost the weight I'd gained, but not the extra cup sizes, and while they're kind of annoying not so much so that I've had them reduced, yet. (There are a lot of active women with larger breasts. And we spend a fortune on bras. Gods, you do not want to do spinning flying jump kicks without having your breasts constrained. Running is also especially fun, and it's pretty common to wear a compression style sports bra over an encapsulation style one.) But I don't think we're talking particularly high power consumption, and I don't think putting a battery in the cups would be my first choice. Give the bra a nice wide strap in the back - which will make it more comfortable anyway, and put a pocket for the battery there. Something along the lines of a cell phone battery should to it, and you have fewer nerve endings on your back and spines curve less backwards than forwards, so you're less likely to end up with it pinching. And you could easily fit two - and smaller separate batteries will be more comfortable than larger single ones.

      Of course, there still is the question of whether we've talking about multiple bras that can take the sensors, or sensors in some kind of framework that easily and comfortably inserts or attaches to bras. The latter might be more difficult to do well, but I'd tend to prefer it.

      There's a lot of variability in terms of what is expanding during breathing - I think one strain gauge, and figure you're not going to get a lot of data, or go to the other extreme and outfit a close fitting tank. I find myself with mixed feelings about an accelerometer - I do soft body biomechanics as part of my academic research, and while I'm not doing motion capture as such, a lot is done in my field, so I have an immediate response of - oh yeah, we'll find something to do with it! But then, I also do soft body modelling, and use community tools when I can (OMG, trying to model slug mouths in bullet blows up so very badly...) which means, of course, that I'm well aware of the vast amount of time and effort that has gone into beter modelling of breasts for the gaming market and... yeah, no. (I think, on the whole, the opportunity for movement analysis is worthwhile, and you'd have to include quite a few for breast modelling. But then, these days accelerometers are cheap.)

    28. Re:They're not being assholes! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I guess the idiots that marked this flamebait never read the MSDS on Acetone.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    29. Re:They're not being assholes! by metaforest · · Score: 1

      I'm sure most of the nerds here would like access to the 'raw variables'. Spice of life and all that. Most of us guys cannot contribute here as we lack the shelf to hang these raw variables on, and tend to spend far too much time trying to infer meaningful data from indirect observations... It is a terrible way to gather data.... ;)

  15. your is mood is a system error has occurred by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    place press your boobs to reboot.

  16. Not only that by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

    . . .we're talking Ballmer's hands on your flesh, by proxy.
    Might not be a bad thing if you're Mrs. Ballmer, but, otherwise. . .

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Not only that by Urkki · · Score: 1

      . . .we're talking Ballmer's hands on your flesh, by proxy.

      Might not be a bad thing if you're Mrs. Ballmer, but, otherwise. . .

      Why do you think Mrs.Balmer would like her husbands hands (by proxy) on the flesh of other women?

    2. Re:Not only that by turtledawn · · Score: 2

      means they're not on hers.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    3. Re:Not only that by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      Someone has never been married...

    4. Re:Not only that by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      10 years in July. What's your point, sir?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  17. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by fermion · · Score: 2
    You know vibrators were invented, the official story goes, because women would get hysterical and one way doctors would treat it would be to manually stimulate the woman to orgasm. Presumably men in the habit of paying amateurs to do so. The vibrator was then a labor saving device.

    From this one would assume that if women are overeating because of stress, the some sort of stress sensing panties are in order. Stimulation can automatically be applied and relieve the stress.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  18. Wrong fundamental assumption by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fundamental problem with this is that overeating doesn't cause obesity.

    Some recent scientific results (*) have clarified obesity, and are completely at odds with every "common knowledge" explanation. The bad news is that we don't know what causes obesity and there's nothing anyone can do [currently] to combat it. The good news is that it's not related to a) what you eat(**) b) how much you eat, c) your willpower, d) genetics, or e) exercise.

    Relax, it's not your fault.

    In the current model the digestive system presents a river of nutrients, from which the body takes what it needs to maintain a specific weight.The body has a set-point in the manner of a thermometer for how much nutrition to take in, and something in the environment disturbs this set-point(***), resulting in obesity. There is strong statistical evidence that this is not related to the amount or type of food eaten(*) (within dietary reason) or the level of exercise. Over 700 possible factors have been suggested, including Bisphenol-A in packaging, estrogenic compounds in the environment, and water fluoridation.

    Your diet worked for you, and that's great; however, it didn't fix your obesity(***): something you did along with the diet changed the environment and your body regained a normal set-point. For this reason, no diet is universal: it's happenstance.

    Exercise isn't what fixed your obesity. Again, nothing related to nutrition (within obvious limits) or exercise is the cause of obesity. Something else is at play. Whether exercise is good for you is a different issue; it's just not the cause of your obesity.

    Modeling your body as a thermodynamic system sounds logical and "makes sense", but without actually going into starvation it's not the correct description of the problem. You can burn many calories simply by sleeping with fewer covers (more than you can by exercising), but your body will simply take more from the stream. This won't affect your obesity.

    * Modern-day laboratory animals are fat, despite having the same diet and exercise as lab animals raised in previous decades. Statistically, the trend is very strong.

    ** A nutritional balance is necessary (of course). Whether junk food is good for you is a separate issue; however, it's not the cause of your obesity.

    *** The difference in caloric intake between normal and obese is about 30 calories/day (about 3 peanut M&Ms), which is roughly 1% of your daily nutritional needs. No diet has this level of resolution, no diet can be this accurate by measuring servings without taking into account the condition of the serving (ie - chicken fattier than average, veggies drier than average, &c.)

    1. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Informative

      Scientific paper referenced is here.

      Along with a table and chart of the increases.

    2. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fundamental problem with this is that overeating doesn't cause obesity.

      Some recent scientific results (*) have clarified obesity, and are completely at odds with every "common knowledge" explanation. The bad news is that we don't know what causes obesity and there's nothing anyone can do [currently] to combat it. The good news is that it's not related to a) what you eat(**) b) how much you eat, c) your willpower, d) genetics, or e) exercise.

      Actually... it's totally and completely related to what you eat and your genetics. Will power and excercise are pretty wimpy tools against eating food that's wrong for your blood type.

      Only way of choosing food that I've seen work for everyone who's applied it correctly (The book is wrong and outdated) and has worked downright miracles with the truly sick I've run into as well.

      Choose your foods according to your blood type and you'll automatically drop/gain to the general 'average' weight for your size.

      Now you know. :)

    3. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny then that a whole TV show like The Biggest Loser (granted, not a very good one) can be based around making obese people lose weight by increasing the amount they exercise and decreasing their intake of calories. Every season, without fail, they achieve drastic weight loss based on those two factors alone, so it's really a stretch to claim that they aren't very strong factors in weight loss. I know there's a growing trend of pretending what people do to their bodies will have no effect on their weight, but it's simply not true.

    4. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by schnell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some recent scientific results (*) have clarified obesity, and are completely at odds with every "common knowledge" explanation. The bad news is that we don't know what causes obesity and there's nothing anyone can do [currently] to combat it. The good news is that it's not related to a) what you eat(**) b) how much you eat, c) your willpower, d) genetics, or e) exercise.

      I have not done a scientific study, but I am pretty sure that if I eat three Denny's meals per day and do no exercise, I will become obese. I know some obese people, and I can verify that their caloric intake vs. mine (minus exercise) does not net out to 30 calories per day.

      If that's not the case, please let me know... I am tired of cardio and would be interested in partaking in their forthcoming Hobbit-themed breakfasts if there's no relationship to weight gain. ;-)

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    5. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fundamental problem with this is that overeating doesn't cause obesity.

      Let's just stop right there and digest this statement like a 300-pound man who just ate four cheeseburgers for a snack.

      A person eating a normal amount of healthy food should not grow to obese proportions 98% of the time. Over time, your metabolism can change/slow down which will affect your weight if you do not adjust your caloric intake accordingly, or modify your activity level.

      In the end, this IS simple math that doesn't require 700 variables and studies. Exercise and take in equal or less calories than you burn. Period. Dieticians have proven that for decades. So has common sense. So has history, unless you're the only one who feels we've had this "growing epidemic" for hundreds of years now.

      Now you may stop bringing in variables that apply to the 2% of those with a genuine reason to be obese in order to excuse the other 98% of society too lazy to give a shit about adjusting either activity levels or eating habits. The bottom line is you ARE overeating if you're not adjusting accordingly for metabolic rate or activity level, which can and will affect your weight drastically. It's that simple for the majority of the planet.

      And stop making excuses for people to not get off their ass and exercise. Your entire post smacks of this, as if no human in the history of mankind has ever lost or maintained a healthy weight through diet and exercise. They don't call it junk food because it's made in a junkyard. The type of food does matter (types of fat for example), and again, has been proven for decades. And you can either sit around and scratch your head as to why a lab rat is fat and continue to blame the oxygen in the air, or you can get off your ass and realize you're not a lab rat. Me knowing that lab rats are fatter these days doesn't do jack shit for the number on my scale. That is up to ME. Of course, asking people to take individual responsibility these days might as well be a felony offense, which is why you have studies full of excuses.

      The human body is a machine like any other, and it requires normal maintenance, regardless of weight. We did that all the time running around as kids. You don't do shit with that machine except feed it processed shit as an adult, and go figure it's gonna break down in the worst possible way, from obesity to heart disease. You say you stopped changing the oil in your car and it blew up on you? Shocking. Positively shocking.

    6. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That paper does ***not*** show that "overeating doesn't cause obesity." What it shows is that there is other factors also causing obesity. The fact that obesity is correlated with many different factors is not novel, and that is all that that paper shows (i.e. that obesity can be correlated with factors that do not involved eating or exercise). You're gonna need a better source to show that overeating doesn't cause obesity, and a damned good one at that, considering the connection between obesity and overeating has been scientifically (and non-scientifically) established many, many times (it's a simple fact of biology, in fact).

      Posted AC due to mod points.

    7. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

      A person eating a normal amount of healthy food should not grow to obese proportions 98% of the time.

      Modern laboratory animals are obese, despite having the same diet and same exercise as ones grown in previous decades, per the study referenced above.

      Is your world-view on obesity fixed, or can it be adjusted based on new information?

      I'd be interested to hear how your world-view of obesity explains this facts. Can you enlighten us?

    8. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

      Every season, without fail, they achieve drastic weight loss based on those two factors alone...

      And their subjects are in the same environment they were in when they got obese. Yes?

      And every participant achieves drastic weight loss - no one finds the new regime ineffective, yes?

      I should get all my scientific opinions from reality TV. It's so much easier than reading the literature...

    9. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      read the stuff again. overeating will lead to obesity in most cases, where there isn't some disease/condition preventing the fat accumulation, in which case the person isn't really overeating anyways.

      But, you could think it from the other way - without overeating it's __impossible__ to become obese. . statistics back this up (counting out exotic diseases, elephantinism or whatever). besides, it's a proven method for losing weight: eat less, do more - or inversely a proven method for getting fat: eat more and do less.

      (and it doesn't really work like a river that it takes what it needs, it takes what it can and figures out where to put it later).

      if you really think you're fat because of pixies or whatever, think then why overeating is overeating. how do you define overeating if not by _eating too much_ ?!? wtf dude.

      3 m&m's? it's more like 2 cheeseburgers that's the difference.

      The formula works, for performing work, if you don't enough calories you'll starve. THAT is what they were made for and many people were worked to death to test 'em out.. it works for losing weight.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by muhula · · Score: 2

      You're missing the point of the GP post. Yes, if you eat more calories, you're going to get fatter than if you didn't. But his point is this: why are some people constantly hungry when they eat the same amount of food that fills another person? What in the environment is changing that is causing various groups of research animals (across different species) to increase their weight over the years? According to this paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081766/, the odds of this trend happening by chance is 1.2 × 10^7.

    11. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fundamental problem with this is that overeating doesn't cause obesity.

      Some recent scientific results (*) have clarified obesity,....

      There is a whole realm of pseudo-scientists standing in line to make scientific sounding mumbo-jumbo which sounds like what you would like to hear. Typically it eventually involves the movement of money in their direction; but, sometimes they just prime the pump hoping that the money will eventually come.

      The calories go in the mouth, and some come out the end. What disappears is that which is absorbed by the body (what we call "measured" calories, or the ones that are listed on the labels). One person's body is very much like another's in this respect, it it were otherwise, many of us would be dead.

      Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Until one starts a food journal, odds are excellent that they have been using their imperfect memories and their forgiving point of view to track their diet. Doing so is similar to trusting a person who is known to be untrustworthy in the past and has such a distorted view of reality even their "truth" deviates from a 3rd person's observations.

      I had a friend, and he was really a great friend; however, he could down an entire 1/2 a chicken and within an hour complain that he's hungry because he hasn't eaten anything that day. My sister-in-law could out eat myself and my brother at any given sitting. Both of them claimed that if they drank water they gained weight, that it was genetics or something. Funny how after her stomach was stapled she lost weight. I guess they didn't need to replace her DNA after all.

    12. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have not done a scientific study, but I am pretty sure that if I eat three Denny's meals per day and do no exercise, I will become obese.

      Well maybe you would, but are you saying that *anyone* would? The science (and many of our experiences) would indicate that the answer is "no".

      I'll give my anecdotal evidence. When I was 16-20 years old, I would eat an astounding amount of food. I could eat anything. In one meal, I would eat a whole chicken, a side of fries, a big piece of cake for dessert, and drink 48 oz of soda while doing it. It makes me a little ill now just to think about it. And that would be after eating a Big Mac, large fries, and a milkshake for lunch. It didn't even seem like a lot to me then. And you know what? I was really skinny. 6'1" tall, and 140 lbs. I did no exercise.

      Then at 20 years old, I put on 50 lbs in something like 8 months. I still wasn't fat, really. I just wasn't super-skinny anymore. And I hadn't changed my exercise or diet. Then I stayed at 190lbs for about 5 years. How much I ate seemed to have no effect on my weight. I could eat like I did when I as 18, and I stayed 190 lbs. I could spend a month eating half as much food, and I would stay 190 lbs. After those 5 years, though, not changing my exercise or diet, I started putting on weight and got up around 206, and I started feeling a little pudgy. I cut *way* back on my caloric intake-- like I ate half as much as I used to-- and I started exercising quite a lot, which brought me down to about 198-200lbs, which is where I am today.

      Wanting to get back down to 190, I've tried starving myself and working out a lot. Eating much less and leaving myself hungry made me feel much worse on a daily basis, but I didn't lose any weight. Working out made me feel much better and look better, but again, I didn't lose weight. The only time I've dipped below 200 lbs was during a stint of unemployment for a few months, when I lost 5 lbs. I was eating more calories, not watching my diet at all, and not particularly exercising more. My theory is that it had something to do with the fact that I was relaxed and happy, instead of being miserable at work all the time.

    13. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then at 20 years old, I put on 50 lbs in something like 8 months.

      It's "common knowlege" that folks in their teens can eat a lot more without putting on weight. My dad was 110 lbs. at 18, but shot up quickly and had to cut down on his intake. That isn’t to say your weight gain wasn’t caused by some mystical chemical in the water supply, but putting on weight fast around that age is nothing unusual.

    14. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe your body and metabolism are intended for optimal operation at 190 lbs. If you feel great working out and don't reduce your weight you should embrace the reality that your body wants to be a specific weight. If you keep your body toned why worry about weight? I prefer a woman with firm well-defined curves in the right places; makes it easier to hold her and she'll fill-out the lingerie much better too. I suffer from being highly visual and tactile.

    15. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear thick skulled reader. I will put you on three carbohydrate diets, each with the same calory value and composed of a single thing (plus vitamins & minerals). Only with one of them you will get significantly obese. Check the peer reviewed literature and stop being a lazy ignoramus.

    16. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cardio is such a bad idea. But worse of an idea is that exercise is necessary to loose weight, when usually what happens is the other way round. See http://www.dietdoctor.com/what-happens-if-you-eat-5800-calories-daily-on-an-lchf-diet, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceFyF9px20Y and strength building exercises, like http://stronglifts.com.

      I've never been thinner and stronger since I started eating fat and doing weights instead of cardio. And I always overeat (healthy food).

    17. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by dbrueck · · Score: 1

      I used to think the same thing as you, but it turns out that "common sense" is wrong in this area, as are many dieticians (who too often also just rely on common sense). And history (at least in the form of rigorous scientific studies) does /not/ agree with you.

      Overeating and obesity are correlated, but get this: some of the most current scientific studies show that, if anything, overeating is actually an *effect* of obesity and not a cause. What makes us fat? If you want to point to one thing and focus on it, it's carbohydrates. In a nutshell: carbs lead to insulin increases in the bloodstream, insulin tells fat tissue to remove energy from the bloodstream and store it as fat. Guess what happens when too much energy is removed (and stored as fat) such that there's not enough for normal body functions? Yep! You feel hungry, so you eat more.

      In general, a reduction in carbs leads to a reduction in obesity, although the degree of the effect varies by body type and genetics and how much damage has been done from years of high carb eating. Also generally speaking, when people see a weight loss reduction from exercising, being on a "reality" TV show, or starting some fad diet, any lasting effects are likely to be highly correlated with a reduction (intentional or not) in carb intake.

      There are numerous books on this subject and, sadly, the link between carbs and obesity has been recognized for over a hundred years. Unfortunately it fell out of fashion due to a combination of geopolitics and the health/exercise craze, among other things.

      Don't get me wrong: I love to exercise. And I hate the victim mentality and am a huge believer in personal responsibility. But there is quite a large body of evidence that shows that the "eat less! be more active!" mentality is completely wrong. As in, those are generally great bits of advice (and have many helpful effects), but they neither prevent nor solve obesity.

      For an accessible, entry level work on the subject, see "Why We Get Fat" by Gary Taubes, although he's the first to point out that the key principles he talks about have been understood for over a century.

    18. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by dbrueck · · Score: 1

      read the stuff again. overeating will lead to obesity in most cases, where there isn't some disease/condition preventing the fat accumulation, in which case the person isn't really overeating anyways.

      But, you could think it from the other way - without overeating it's __impossible__ to become obese. .

      Unfortunately, this is well-documented as not being the case. Our "common sense" screams that it's true, but it's not, and so we really have a hard time letting go of it. :) You can start reading about it by Googling "obesity malnutrition paradox" (some of the links will take you to malnutrition via overeating, I'm not talking about those, but there are oodles of resources about obesity in populations where there are nowhere near enough calories to reach what is considered the minimum recommended daily intake). What's particularly compelling is that the same scenario is documented in many different peoples/societies in many different time periods - so it's incredibly well-established that obesity can and does occur without excessive caloric intake. Also, there are an abundance of studies that refute the notion that overeating *causes* obesity - there is a correlation, yes, but there isn't solid scientific evidence to support a causal relationship in the way you indicate (although there is a good bit of evidence that shows a causal relationship in the other direction - obesity leading to overeating).

      statistics back this up (counting out exotic diseases, elephantinism or whatever). besides, it's a proven method for losing weight: eat less, do more - or inversely a proven method for getting fat: eat more and do less.

      Actually, no, there is a strong tie between eating less / doing more and feeling hungry, but not between eating less / doing more and losing weight and keeping it off for any interesting length of time. A really interesting link though is that the rise of the "eat less / do more" philosophy (as a way to control weight) more or less exactly correlates with the obesity epidemic - not saying it caused obesity, but that those ideas as a means of weight control replaced earlier, more correct ideas, and that transition in thinking also marks the rise in obesity. Similarly, there is strong evidence that the introduction of the food pyramid with a high carbohydrate base has been particularly disastrous. Prior to both of these philosophies, it was fairly well-accepted that carbohydrate intake and obesity had a causal relationship, but these fell out of fashion... and obesity rates took off.

      (and it doesn't really work like a river that it takes what it needs, it takes what it can and figures out where to put it later).

      This too isn't quite right, unless you for some reason don't poop and pee. A really obvious example is most types of fiber - for the most part fiber passes right through your system (which, incidentally, is why e.g. a diabetic can for the most part ignore fiber when counting carbs to predict glycemic impact of a meal - the vast majority of the fiber isn't metabolized into sugars and just passes on through). Maybe that's what you meant by "takes what it can", but just because a calorie is introduced into the body, it doesn't somehow force the body to hang onto it - the body is quite adept at giving off what it doesn't think it needs (hint for what follows below: the problem isn't that the body doesn't know what to do with excess calories, but that it is being quite directly told to hang on to too many calories). Further, all calories aren't created equal - simple sugars, especially those already in liquid form, get sucked up by your body much more easily than the calories that are in the small, digestible portion of fiber.

      Perhaps the misconception is because it's easy to assume that e.g. eating a fatty or high calorie food means more fat will end up on your body. That's not exactly how it works though - your body contains fat t

    19. Re:Wrong fundamental assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The siblings have already pointed out lots of problems with what you said far better than I could except I have one thing to add: eating less can actually make you _gain_ weight. Your body can interpret the sudden drop in caloric intake as a crisis situation and start stockpiling calories as fat.

  19. Ahh I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the days of twin floppies.

    As Number 5 said "Nice Firmware"

  20. an app? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    It's amazing how our brains are evolved over millions of years to make sense, and yet some will look for any excuse not to use it. If they treat their own brain this way, why would they honor an app?

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:an app? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Consumer society evolved over the last century or so to exploit the hell out of our brains, because it can evolve quicker than we can.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  21. April Fools Day? by endoboy · · Score: 1

    OK, they're off by a few months, but my first reaction to the headline was definitely "clearly, this is a joke...."

  22. The name of that product is ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    !Binge

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  23. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by pspahn · · Score: 1

    ...because women would get hysterical...

    I see what you did there.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  24. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe microsoft will finally get something right

  25. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is stuff out there like this already. Durex is working on it.

  26. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the asshole. A self righteous asshole.

  27. riiiight... by Rastarn · · Score: 1

    So Microsoft's new slogan is "No fat chicks!"?

  28. No it cant! by dohzer · · Score: 1

    The Smart Bra can't stop me over eating. The Smart Bro or the Intelligent Manssiere probably could.

  29. And this helps....how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so, I'm an emotional mess and my boobs are telling me not to eat while the rest of me is saying the complete opposite.

    I'm totally going to not eat!

    Who thinks of this stuff?

  30. How this will end up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple will introduce an iBra that you can automatically unclip with an expensive iPhone app only.

    Microsoft will then introduce a Windows Bra that is functional but unexciting, and be slightly irritating to operate.

    An open source Linux powered bra will subsequently be developed, but it will take so long to fiddle with until you achieve the desired result that you end up forgetting what your goal was in the first place.

    1. Re:How this will end up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple could probably re-purpose some of the original iMac shells for their bra.

      Microsoft will build a Windows Bra with only one cup.

      Linux will build a Linux powered bra with built in socks and umbrella.

  31. Yaaaaaawn. How useless and boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First it's an endless parade of diets and pills by doctors on weight loss...

    Now it's micro$haft with a cutesy but ultimately worthless electronic gadget for wightloss. Wait... does this mean they're getting out of the software biz??

    lol

  32. Jolt to the nips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like a jolt of electricity to the nips to convince someone to put down that tub of ice-cream.

    Unless they're into that sort of thing, of course.

  33. Geeks rejoice. The technology has been found! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft employees found a way to finally touch some breasts!

  34. This just confirms that... by Suiggy · · Score: 0

    All women are a mindless, vapid, weak-willed whores who need to be told what to do.

    1. Re:This just confirms that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that as "horses" and was offended because horses have been dependably useful throughout much of human history, women much less so

    2. Re:This just confirms that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youre right. Its your mothers fault you exist to post here.

    3. Re:This just confirms that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least I can afford a keyboard that has a working ' key.

  35. A window into your gut by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    In other news, Microsoft is marketing a line of edibles ("Blue Food") and an app that will tell you when to eat it.

  36. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fat chicks already have DD's. They're buried in the size 48 wastlines and "oh my god the humanity!" hips.

  37. UI? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    So is this going to have a touch interface?

    1. Re:UI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nipple is the ONLY intuitive interface!

  38. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Damn corporations, pushing products and lifestyles that make people fat!

    Damn corporations, pushing products and lifestyles that make people nonfat!

  39. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm actually pretty amused by the sensor rigged bra - heck, I wear a bra to run in anyway, way better than a separate heart rate monitor. Though no proprietary MS crap for me ;-) (Can't imagine they provide decent support, y'know?)

    But it seems horribly tone deaf to decide to put their sensors in a bra, and then make the whole thing be about dieting. Please folks, try not to be assholes.

    Would you have preferred a body cavity instead? Perhaps your mouth would have been a more ideal place for Microsoft to insert their tech.

    Much like heart rate monitors by other vendors, bras are not some sort of new perverted idea to monitor heart rate and stress levels.

    And it's ironic that a guy has to tell a woman to get their mind out of the gutter.

  40. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish they'd developed something like this before I needed a bra.

  41. Moobies by McGruber · · Score: 1

    "A team of engineers at Microsoft Research have developed a high-tech bra that's intended to monitor women's stress levels and dissuade them from emotional over-eating.

    Actually, the team's original idea was to monitor the CEO's excitement levels and dissuade him from dancing..... so they created the "Bramer".

    Then marketing got ahold of it.

  42. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is offering a service equal to being an asshole? If you don't want to be alerted of your mood, don't buy the damn device. It isn't mandatory, Microsoft won't send a squad of mercenaries to force you to buy it.
    And it isn't "shaming" at all, it sends the alert to your phone, not to everyone's you dumb fuck.

  43. Talk about NSA data gathering.... by gorehog · · Score: 1

    Micro$oft finding new data to provide to the NSA. You know...I wonder if they're monitoring all that bluetooth enabled heart rate data out there?

  44. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by turning+in+circles · · Score: 2

    Good point about Microsoft not known for providing decent support.

    Sports bra heart rate monitors are old hat, you can even get them on Amazon. Comments show that they provide great support even for large chested ladies, and are thin enough your nipples still show through.

    I'm not sure I would wear a bra that told me I was overeating. I am thinking that one would stay in the closet, especially when I felt most like overeating.

    --
    Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
  45. No, you're tone deaf. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    How the hell are you being tagged as insightful? You whine - and yes it is a whine - that they are being assholes because they dared to release a female-specific product to help women manage their weight when women face an image problem and yet, you so devalue why they did it.

    Here's the tone: they are trying to help. Again: they are trying to help. The keyword here is help. Whether or not the product is gender specific is irrelevant. Whether or not there is an image problem out there or not is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether this is a tool that will help people manage their weight and it is.

    They're taking advantage of what's available. In this case, women wear bras. It's a way to make the monitoring invisible. It's a way to not single anyone out. You say, "for heaven's sake don't only make it for women", so you would rather they not use the fact that most women wear bras in order to aid the health of women? You would rather discard any tool that would by its very nature have to be gender specific, because it was gender specific? If not, what the hell are you saying?

    As for the image problem. I'm well aware of it. But God almighty, more are dying by not doing anything about their weight than those over-correcting by orders of magnitude.

    Here is how women died in 2010:
    http://www.cdc.gov/women/lcod/2010/index.htm

    You won't find eating disorders or poor self esteem. This is not to say that these aren't serious issues, but the means to do so is certainly not ignoring weight. (Which plays a HUGE role in the number one killer of women, heart disease.)

    1. Re:No, you're tone deaf. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tone is an interesting thing. A single note ringing out in silence doesn't invoke any sentiment or meaning, but in the context of other tones a single tone determines whether a major or minor chord is being played. In the context of a sexist body-shaming culture, this particular note falls flat.

    2. Re:No, you're tone deaf. by artor3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you know what "tone deaf" means? It doesn't mean "wrong". It means that they didn't consider the cultural context around their actions. They unwittingly did something that many people would find offensive.

      Here's the tone: they are trying to help.

      Haha, sure they're trying to help ... their bottom line. Companies exist to make money. They're not doing this as a public service.

      It is in their best interest not to offend their customers. It does not help anyone to shame people for being overweight. They would have been better off marketing it as a general fitness tool, rather than focusing on over-eating.

      Can you understand that? No one is saying it shouldn't exist.

    3. Re:No, you're tone deaf. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only you put in as much effort into your eating habits as your metaphors, eh?

    4. Re:No, you're tone deaf. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      It is in their best interest not to offend their customers.

      This is Microsoft we're talking about. Regardless of the technical merits or otherwise, sumping XP is essentially offending a massive and feircely loyal customer base. Seriously these people would buy CP for new machines if it were still available. Almost any other company would give almost anything for that sort of customer. IOW MS knows more than almost anyone about pissing off customers (except perhaps Sony).

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:No, you're tone deaf. by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      They come out with a wearable vital signs monitor and their first thought is... Let's stop women from getting fat by yelling at them when they are stressed!

      Not... we can market it to seniors and life alert companies so when Grandma has a heart attack we can automatically dispatch the paramedics without her needing to push a button.

      Not... we can put it in a sports bra so people working out get their shiny metrics.

      No. It's well detect you are stressed and yell at you to step away from the fridge. WTF? If I'm having a shitty day why do I want clippy constantly nagging me about how fat I am?

      Nice technology. Nice intentions. Still a stupid idea.

  46. A way to increase sales of Windows phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I'm having an argument with someone or am in some other similar stressful situation, the last thing I want is for my phone to alert me and tell me that I'm in a bad mood.

    I imagine sales of replacement phones will skyrocket when people start throwing their Windows phones in fits of anger.

    1. Re:A way to increase sales of Windows phones by Urkki · · Score: 1

      When having an argument, getting your phone to interrupt you sounds like a great idea! Would save many a family from a divorce, I'm sure, at a small cost of a few smashed smartphones here and there.

  47. Supprt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, Microsoft supports their customers properly.

  48. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    To amplify the thought, they could have pitched it for fitness and activity monitoring, or to identify what times of day are causing stress without being particularly noticed.

  49. We have a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A team of engineers at Microsoft Research have developed a high-tech bra that's intended to monitor women's stress levels

    THIS is the hottest IT job for interns.

  50. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Barny · · Score: 2

    You aren't thinking the 'next step' in this.

    Bra as a service
    The best support you could hope for, exactly when you need it.

    Of course, MS would need to really work on their support, the few times I have had to contact them for real tech issues, they have wanted to charge me before I could even leave a bug report.

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  51. Doesn't sound effective. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Incorporate a taser in the garment, then you've got something.

    "My boyfriend broke up with me. By email. Hand me that carton of chunky monkey..." KZERRRRK

    "Here's your ice cream. Um, are you ok? Why do you smell like burning latex?"

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  52. Cheaper alternative by paiute · · Score: 1

    You could curb your appetite by putting a picture of Bill Gates on your refrigerator.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  53. This could be really cool... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    They could merge this with positional data and advertising revenue, and give the user a pass on overeating when they're in the vicinity of a paid sponsor. "I can't eat right now, my app says I shouldn't... no wait, it says I can eat now. Hey, there's a McDonald's."

    In time, we'll all just believe our smart phones. "I'm hungry now for... a charbroiled steak. Yeah, at that Black Angus over there. Right now. Um, wait, aren't I a vegetarian?"

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  54. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're looking for an excuse for deploy booth babes (as demo'ers) in their retail stores.

    Personally, I would find that extremely bad taste, but I'd have to go look for myself rather than take someone's word for it.

  55. Why couldn't they make it a smart shirt? by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Seriously..... then it wouldn't be restricted to women!

    1. Re:Why couldn't they make it a smart shirt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously..... then it wouldn't be restricted to women!

      Right. And just how many versions/colors/styles of that smart shirt would you have to create in order to meet the fashion demands of today's woman?

      If your answer is one or two, then you've just pissed off every woman without even knowing it, by not appeasing to them and their sense of style.

      In the meantime, men would go "meh, good enough" to the plain white smart shirt, and wear it, instantly creating a sexist product in the opposite manner in which you ever intended.

    2. Re:Why couldn't they make it a smart shirt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because the sensors need to be tightly and precisely located against the skin. For most shirt styles, it wouldn't help to have the sensors loosely flopping about in the general vicinity. One might imagine a tight bicyclists' spandex shirt version; but, those folks are less likely to need weight loss / diet reminders (and probably wouldn't be wearing that shirt all day long).

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. What are the odds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that a Microsoft bra will be the best fitting?

    Better to put the sensor on a device that can be worn with any bra. But, you'd have to want to wear the thing. What do you suppose the market is like for a "just in case I over-eat" sensor?

    This will be in future amusing product failures internet memes.

  58. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the asshole.

    Oooh, burn! Best comeback EVA!

  59. It is good to see... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 0
    ... that the /. crowd has lived up to the stereotype of the male-dominated computer industry. Many of the comments on this thread are little more than unprofessional and despicably sexist.

    .
    And people wonder why there are not more women in the computer industry.

    1. Re:It is good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo-hoo. /. is never much professional, the comments are always full of jokes. Lighten up.

      And people wonder why there are not more women in the computer industry.

      Marketing guys are WAY worse, they never get shit for it and there's more women in marketing. Maybe women don't like to work with ugly nerds, maybe they're not smart enough, or maybe they just don't like it. Stop blaming everything on us, you have absolutely no proof either way. Besides, women get it much easier than men in tech, unless we completely do their jobs for them there's not much more we can do to help.

    2. Re:It is good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we will have a sensor to tell us when we are being sexist.

      And now when staring at breasts, we have an excuse: "Sorry just taking a reading."

      It really is a win win.

  60. Women are not aware of their emotions? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Does any normal person need a device to tell them they are stressed and emotional?
    I have a solution:
    In your wallet or purse where you store your money... place a card saying "Are you eating out of stress? again?" maybe with a little photo of something motivational on it. Just in case you are not aware of your feelings at the time you are hungry.

    Or instead of all that tech cost. pay somebody to explain how your anxiety makes you feel hungry.

  61. Spoiler Alert: Not for Babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am very disappointed that this is not an invention to help babies. I am seeing far too many that are far too fat.

  62. Keeping up to date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice that Microsoft stays abreast with the latest technologies...

  63. Filter bubble by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    The Filter Bubble

    .
    ya need to move beyond it.

    Maybe women don't like to work with ugly nerds, maybe they're not smart enough, or maybe they just don't like it. Stop blaming everything on us,

    You are the problem.

    So the question remains, what do you want to do to solve the problem. Technical people like to solve problems, why can't they seem to solve this one?

  64. Thank you Microsoft! by formfeed · · Score: 1

    For solving a problem brought to your attention by the Onion.

  65. Why Microsoft is failing. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They clearly haven't looked at this from the users perspective.

    I don't want some device telling me I am emotional and stressed and shouldn't be eating. Fact is I would probably smash the device after a while.

    Of course on top of that, it hurts my emotional and stress levels to be told that I am emotional and am stressed out.

    The whole thing is one big fail.

    1. Re:Why Microsoft is failing. by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      And this really only applies to emotional eaters. Some people just eat junk food for their diet. Others eat healthy, then drink 500 calories worth of Starbucks in the morning and another 1000 calories of margaritas in the evening.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Why Microsoft is failing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't want some device telling me I am emotional and stressed and shouldn't be eating. Fact is I would probably smash the device after a while.
      Selling systems that the user eventually hates... good ol' microsoft.

  66. Microsoft and jokes about bras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never thought Microsoft would allow itself to become the target of jokes about bras!

    I'm trying to understand the sociology behind this. Is it something like, "Steve Ballmer and some rich acquaintances were drunk at lunch and thinking they had enough money, so it is time to trash the company."

    Microsoft needs adult supervision.

  67. A solution that produces stress? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    I would think wearing one of these things would itself be stress-inducing. A bra that nags?

  68. ctrl+alt+del by PC_THE_GREAT · · Score: 1

    Am definitely pressing ctrl alt del this time! Tech support guys are gonna love getting house call's on this one. On a serious note, now after all the information tech giants harvest out of your private life, now they want your cup size or that of your wife! Once again, the world just.. buys it.

  69. Protip: by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

    DO NOT buy one of these for your wife or girlfriend. In fact, don't ever acknowledge that you're aware of its existence.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Protip: by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      DO NOT buy one of these for your wife or girlfriend. In fact, don't ever acknowledge that you're aware of its existence.

      -jcr

      I don't recommend this approach. That's what I did, and ultimately it divorced me and took half my stuff.

  70. The Abracada-bra (The I.T. Crowd) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still won't be as good as the abracadabra.

    BTW, my tits are hot . . . they're on fire! No! They're really on FIRE!

  71. Windows on a bra by giorgist · · Score: 1

    Hang on, I like the idea of windows on a bra. Finally they might get an upvote from me.

  72. Shock Jock by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's surprising is that nobody here thinks this is an inherently sexist device.

    Rumor has it they are coming out with the Shock Jock, to zap your nuts if you eat too much. Either that, it makes you use Windows Ate.

  73. "can stop you" cant stop me ... by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    because I am a man

  74. the next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And of course collecting data about a person's mood and relating it to browsing habits is the next essential step for the improvement of targeted advertising.

  75. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by tylikcat · · Score: 1

    *laughs*

    Do you know many women? I haven't noticed that we spend a particularly small amount of time with our minds in the gutter.

  76. Say no to someone in an emotional state... by YalithKBK · · Score: 1

    If you're upset/stressed/worried and just want to do something simple to make yourself feel a little better, the worst thing you can have happen is someone nagging you about not doing to one thing that you think would make you feel better. It's a good way to get someone more upset and a good way to end up with a broken phone.

  77. I'd love to by Chysn · · Score: 1

    see a Beowulf Cluster of these things.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
    1. Re:I'd love to by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Ever been to a conference of real estate agents?

  78. Too complex by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Rather than sending information to a smart phone app the bra could just give back direct feedback to the woman by tightening the bra. For the really adventurous women they might consider the more more advanced version which applies selective electrical shock.

    Unfortunately, because it is from Microsoft it will be too complex and filled with all sorts of extra features like the automatic back scratcher, software downloader, nipple massager, uplift and inflatorator with optional shaper and toner that links in through wireless networks to other bras and underpants in the surrounding area.

    K.I.S.

  79. Google's response by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    The data is sent to a smartphone app, which then alerts users about their mood.

    The upcoming Google version will respond by connecting to the user's Google glasses and popping up a Ben & Jerry's ad.

    New banana and anchovy flavour If their Google Loo thinks they might be pregnant...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  80. Bra Wars by Dareth · · Score: 1

    And Apple will offer many different, often bright pastel and neon, colors. Microsoft's will only come in brown.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  81. Embrace, extend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bras, huh? I know a few guys who would get an "extension" from "embracing" this technology.

  82. As a man the stigma of needing a bra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stigma of needing a bra is what drives me to eat. adding gadgets to it isnt going to fix my manboobs

  83. As if stressed women are too stupid better?!? by gmezero · · Score: 1

    Seriously... the women in my life that stress eat know damn well what they are doing which only compounds the stress. I simply can't see how this isn't going to be offensive to women and come of as a product from a group of arrogant, jack-ass engineers.

  84. Hello...tech support by mdwstmusik · · Score: 1

    > Hello, tech support...my Windows bra is not working.

    | Are you sure your bra is on?

    > Yes

    | Have you tried re-dressing?

    > Yes

    | Okay, let's try starting in safe mode...re-clasp the bra while tapping your left nipple

    --
    "Oh, what sad times these are when passing ruffians can say 'ni' to helpless old ladies."
  85. anything to keep MS afloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's next, clothing lines and perfume from MS?

  86. Creepy by matbury · · Score: 1

    Dieting is only one particular and narrow application for such a device. What else will Microsoft be doing with all that data on where you are, what you're doing, and how you feel about it? This potentially takes surveillance to a whole new level. On a lighter note: - "Hal, open the fridge door." - "I'm sorry Dana. I'm afraid I can't do that."

  87. AbracadaBra by NinjaPablo · · Score: 1

    But will it be as comfortable as the AbracadaBra, at least once the overheating issues are solved?

    --
    SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
  88. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1
    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  89. Re:Microsoft enters the lucrative fat shaming mark by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Maybe the psychopathic fuckers should not push lifestyles at all, they push you to achieve happiness through consumerism, something that doesn't work.

    Happiness is ephemeral, The media portray it as some kind of constant state, that is achieved by having a stable job, wife, kids, car, dog and consuming all the crap they sell.

    But hey, if you like that they push all the crap that makes you ill and then try to sell you snake oil to fix it then you must be pretty happy right now.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  90. Obligatory Facetious Trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fat Women Don't Get Raped®

  91. a bra you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that the microsoft support plan?

  92. pick up food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50,000 volts to the nipples.

    Soon they'll learn

  93. marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft - not just for laptops anymore.

  94. WOW I've heard of sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOW I've heard of sexist, but this takes the cake. Well it tells her not to eat the cake anyway.

    1. Re:WOW I've heard of sexist by neminem · · Score: 1

      The Consumerist covered this a couple days ago. It pointed out that they were clear about the fact that they didn't make it a bra because of any feeling that girls need this and guys don't. They made it a bra because they were playing around with unusual smart devices, and the measurements they needed for this particular device required placing a sensor in a location that would require placing it in a bra.

      (And anyway, this was literally just something some guys made because they were playing around with unusual smart devices to test their ability to make some unusual smart devices; nothing Microsoft was even considering making a real product.)

  95. Can it detect hypoglycemia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it detect hypoglycemia in diabetics? The symptoms include a fast pulse and sweating.

  96. Windows? by bbsalem · · Score: 1

    But does it come with Windows installed?

  97. One of the most disappointing comment threads I've by Holladon · · Score: 1

    Fitting, I guess, in light of the fact that they're related to an article about an incredibly useful piece of technology with all kinds of implications for stress monitoring (stress, of course, being a major cause of and/or contributor to all manner of physical and mental health problems) that's being used to ... help keep women skinny.

    I can't decide whether to shake my head or hit it repeatedly on a desk.

  98. Smart Boxers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the smart boxers that stop you from thinking with your dick? I mean as long as we are going to carter to stereo types we should be equal about it.

  99. New Micro$oft Bra and App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So........ Micro$oft is getting into the underwear business and combining an smartphone app with the bra. When I am stressed out, I don't need an app to tell me to stop overeating. Because, lets face it, either the bra is going or the phone is getting busted up. LMAO

    On a side note, is Win8 getting so little attention that they have to change their business plan from software to underwear?

    Just saying!! lolol

    Martha

  100. BSOD? by metaforest · · Score: 1

    Won't someone think of the Girls? Microsoft can't shoulder this responsibility! They have a long history of terrible support! And they lack sensitivity to develop a proper Blueing agent for this context. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bpy75q2DDow) I mean, what woman wants to suffer a Bust Sensor Overload Detection ($B00B1E51) error while jogging, or raiding their fridge! Reboobing in public places can lead to fines or arrest in some jurisdictions!