Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Erases Executed Official From the Internet

itwbennett writes "The North Korean state propaganda machine has edited and deleted hundreds of news articles that mention Jang Song Thaek, the former top government and party official and uncle to leader Kim Jong Un, who was executed Thursday. Earlier this week, Jang was arrested in front of hundreds of senior members of the ruling Worker's Party of Korea and denounced for numerous alleged acts against the state and Kim Jong Un. From arrest to trial to death took only four days and the unprecedented fall from grace is widely being interpreted as an attempt by Kim Jong Un to keep officials loyal and scared."

191 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Word unlocked. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The term 'Orwellian' tends to be overused a bit these days. But, having read 1984, this is something straight out of that book. The adjective is appropriate in this situation: Go ahead and use it.

    1. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am more than certain that not a single soul posting on Slashdot feels the need for anyone, anywhere, especially not one of their own, to give permission to use blatantly inflammatory language to describe anything at all.

    2. Re:Word unlocked. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It's the North Korean Happy Fun Time Hour! Be sure to clap for Dear Leader very enthusiastically! Be sure to stay tuned right to the end, when we show all the lucky children of our great country what it looks like when someone is executed by mortar fire. And remember, clap very enthusiastically... or else.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Word unlocked. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He murdered his uncle for political reasons and doesn't want everyone to know about it, that kind of behaviour predates 1984 by several millennia.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Word unlocked. by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's the North Korean Happy Fun Time Hour! Be sure to clap for Dear Leader very enthusiastically!

      You might be joking, but one of the accused's crimes was, in fact, to not clap enthusiastically enough. It's almost like they are trying to parody themselves.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Word unlocked. by kallisti · · Score: 5, Informative

      In a book on the life of Shostakovich, there was an anecdote about Stalin giving a speech at a farm collective. After he finished, there was a thunderous applause that continued on and on for over half an hour. No one wanted to be known as the first one to stop clapping.

    6. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the North Korean Happy Fun Time Hour! Be sure to clap for Dear Leader very enthusiastically!

      You might be joking, but one of the accused's crimes was, in fact, to not clap enthusiastically enough. It's almost like they are trying to parody themselves.

      Who got accused of what? You can't find any evidence of this supposed uncle on reputable web sites. Only tinfoil-hatted conspiracy theorists believe that Kim Jong-Un ever had an uncle!

    7. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And what does that have to do with what the GP said?

    8. Re:Word unlocked. by SB9876 · · Score: 1

      Hell, there's YouTube videos showing this. They had to have a bell ring to let people know it was safe to stop clapping.

    9. Re:Word unlocked. by ttucker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just remember that Germany voted for Hitler. History can and does happen again, unless we care to learn from it.

    10. Re:Word unlocked. by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Funny thing is, the language in this case isn't so much "inflammatory", as much as it is descriptive. See also The Memory Hole.

      (I wonder if NoKo actually calls the folks tasked with this job the Korean equivalent of "Ministry of Truth" as well...)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    11. Re:Word unlocked. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Do they really have enough electricity in North Korea to operate their telescreens?

    12. Re:Word unlocked. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well if you remember 1984, the main character's job was to re-write history removing individuals from books, news stories, etc.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    13. Re:Word unlocked. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Go read the article. That is exactly what they are doing; removing all references to him. Orwellian is the proper descriptor.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    14. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He murdered his uncle for political reasons and doesn't want everyone to know about it, that kind of behaviour predates 1984 by several millennia.

      I think photoshopping the guy out of pictures, deleting all references to him is what makes it 1984 worthy.

      How do you even know he was murdered, given the above?! This is not simply "hiding a murder"...

    15. Re:Word unlocked. by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He murdered his uncle for political reasons and doesn't want everyone to know about it, that kind of behaviour predates 1984 by several millennia.

      This is not insightful. He murdered his uncle and erased him from history, and very much wanted every North Korean politician, military and ambitious individual to know about it. It's a demonstration of utter ruthlessness designed to ensure obedience.

      When you work for a man capable of doing that to his own uncle, you tread lightly. And that's what he wants. He knows that you and everybody else knows the charges were false - he wants you to know that. But never say it. And if you're in North Korea, you won't.

    16. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If this were Orwellian, they'd probably say that he never existed. This is more Stalinistic than that, I'd say.

      They are already photoshopping him out of everything. Do any of you read the damned news?

      I can't believe we are debating if this is properly Orwellian enough when '1984' gets casually tossed around when healthcare or anti-money laundering regulations come up.

    17. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, no. Hitler did not win any election.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_presidential_election,_1932

    18. Re:Word unlocked. by vux984 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He knows that you and everybody else knows the charges were false

      I'm with you on everything in your post but this. Were they false?

      I don't pretend to be up on North Korean politics, but I recall reading when Kim Jong Un came to power that some of his family members, Aunts and Uncles wielded a lot of power, and that Dear Leader himself had to tread pretty lightly to maintain the balance of power.

      It could well be that his Uncle was making a play for power. Or it could be that Kim Jong Un has consolidated enough support for himself that he can openly move against his opponents. Just saying, ... not that I think Kim Jong Un is some 'force for good' in North Korea, but I'm pretty skeptical that his Uncle was innocent of anything.

    19. Re:Word unlocked. by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know who else voted for Hitler?
      Hitler!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    20. Re:Word unlocked. by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      What they don't show is that the bell ringer was shot on the first ring because it was too early. The bell kept ringing because he was...a dead ringer

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    21. Re:Word unlocked. by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Orwell was writing about Stalinism!

    22. Re:Word unlocked. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      The term 'Orwellian' tends to be overused a bit these days. But, having read 1984, this is something straight out of that book. The adjective is appropriate in this situation: Go ahead and use it.

      Good old sexiest man in the world was afraid. He doesn't like to be afraid. People go away when he's afraid. It makes him feel better. NK is now safer for Dennis's visit, with this dangerous hooligan removed as well.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    23. Re:Word unlocked. by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      He knows that you and everybody else knows the charges were false

      I'm with you on everything in your post but this. Were they false?

      Oh, yes, I am pretty sure they were false. And that the uncle was guilty of a great many things, but not those he were charged with.
      Kim Jong-Un's point wasn't to get him convicted for things he did - the point was to get him convicted, killed and erased on a whim. For that to be truly effective, Kim would need charges that were blatantly false, and some that weren't even against any laws. Which is exactly what he appears to have done.

      It's a truly despicable Machiavellan ploy. The consolation is that few excessively ruthless leaders tend to rule for very long.

    24. Re:Word unlocked. by gtall · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The consolation is that few excessively ruthless leaders tend to rule for very long.", Ya, I think the calculation of the flunkies runs something like "this guy is a lunatic and I might be next, let's all make him next first."

    25. Re: Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      True, but give him a break. He's also the guy who killed Hitler

    26. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just because he lost that election, doesn't mean he didn't win any at all.

    27. Re:Word unlocked. by Chryana · · Score: 3, Informative

      As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of The Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead. This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs -- to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct, nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary. In no case would it have been possible, once the deed was done, to prove that any falsification had taken place.

      George Orwell, 1984

    28. Re:Word unlocked. by Nimey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What makes you think that most people who invoke 1984 have even read it?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    29. Re:Word unlocked. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Basically the typical act of a monarchist. However western press doesn't want to tag it as such because it is all too much of a reminder of who our current monarchical spawn really are and who they descended from.

      As for North Korea, the number of recent execution is a sign of extreme paranoia, that either has a basis in reality and Kim Jong Un is likely to become the un-leader or Kim Jung Un is totally nuts and paranoid and to save themselves the ones left standing will turn him into the un-leader. Here's betting Kim Jung UN has a lethal heart attack or stroke in the not too distant future. I'm sure the US, South Korea and Japan will start feeding a tonne of misinformation into that engine of paranoia in order for it too chew itself to pieces.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    30. Re:Word unlocked. by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Informative

      The consolation is that few excessively ruthless leaders tend to rule for very long.

      I guess it depends on your definitions of both "long" and "excessively", but the 20th century had a pretty good number. Stalin might be the best example, in power for around 30 years. And Francisco Franco was in power for nearly 40 years.

    31. Re:Word unlocked. by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 2

      Or, you could use Damnatio memoriae.

    32. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      False. Hitler did not win election, he lost in 1932. He was made Chancellor in 1933 by then President Hindenburg as a concession to the Nazi Party which did win some elections to the Reichstag. When Hindenburg died, Hitler was unchallenged and then took complete power.

    33. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I read it! And I felt real sorry for that John Hurt guy.

    34. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll have you know Hitler was a war hero... He killed Hitler!

    35. Re:Word unlocked. by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just remember that Germany voted for Hitler. History can and does happen again, unless we care to learn from it.

      And the US voted for Obama.

      There is frequently a disconnect between the reason people vote for someone, and what that person actually does once elected.

    36. Re:Word unlocked. by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Pretty sure the idea for the memory hole came from the soviet purges. See also: Nikolai_Yezhov.

      In other words, the communists didnt get the idea from Orwell, Orwell got the idea from the communists.

    37. Re:Word unlocked. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      That behavior also predates 1984.

    38. Re:Word unlocked. by matfud · · Score: 1

      The idea remains the same. The method has changed.

      Now you ensure that there is so much information out there that nobody can be bothered to trawl through it. Even if people do then their findings will mostly be ignored.

      The great part is that you (as the perpitrator) don't have to do much at all. Just let the pundits run with it.

      In a few years you will have people stareing at pictures claiming the man did exist and many others claiming he did not and his existance was a consipracy (or some odd opinions inbetween)

    39. Re:Word unlocked. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The Soviet paper was called The Truth, so there is precedent.

    40. Re:Word unlocked. by formfeed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      [...] I recall reading when Kim Jong Un came to power that some of his family members, Aunts and Uncles wielded a lot of power, and that Dear Leader himself had to tread pretty lightly to maintain the balance of power.

      It could well be that his Uncle was making a play for power. [..]

      One possibility.

      The other possibility:
      Dear Leader had finally enough power not to listen to his uncle anymore. And his economically more experienced uncle might have told him that some of his new power moves are contra-productive. Like taking South Korean workers hostage and ruining future chances of needed cash flow.
      - I imagine that disrespectful uncle might have said things like: "You know, some of the stuff you're doing is pretty dumb, even for North Korean standards." And Dear leader might have responded: "Oh uh, insurection!"

    41. Re:Word unlocked. by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fidel Castro, and Pol Pot to name a few extra.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    42. Re:Word unlocked. by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      He murdered his uncle for political reasons and doesn't want everyone to know about it

      That's not the official line, but unofficially you'd better believe that he wants everyone to know it. This is young Kim saying to other high level elites, "Don't even think about trying to stage a coup to overthrow me because if I'm willing to kill a family member to make a point, just imagine what I'll do to you." A bit crude and heavy handed perhaps, but effective none the less.

    43. Re:Word unlocked. by PNutts · · Score: 2

      Generallissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.

    44. Re:Word unlocked. by drkim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He murdered his uncle for political reasons...

      ...but - tell the truth - around the holidays, haven't you ever felt like killing someone in your family?

    45. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jang Sung-Taek was running the show from behind the scenes since Kim Jong-Il fell ill, up until fairly recently. I suspect this is more about dear leader's dear auntie consolidating her influence and power, and less about Kim Jong-Un actually having power. The guy essentially usurped power at the first opportunity, it was only a matter of time until Auntie got rid of him.

    46. Re:Word unlocked. by ttucker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, he did not win, but you have mistakenly stumbled upon the point. Do you see anything disturbing about the fact that he had 36% of the vote?

    47. Re:Word unlocked. by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      The Romans called it damnatio memoriae.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    48. Re:Word unlocked. by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that we have too many politicians in this country who see Kim Jong Un as a role model and the Korean system as the ideal form of government. Even more tragic is that too many of the lazy, ignorant American people would probably vote for such a tyrant thinking that they would be given anything they want from a strong centralized government.

    49. Re:Word unlocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nyet, in Soviet Russia, bell asks you for whom it tolls.

    50. Re:Word unlocked. by Megol · · Score: 4, Informative

      And that isn't something new - the first example that comes to mind is the systematic removal of Pharaoh Akhenatons name after his death. The only difference is that nowadays there are photos and videos to edit too.

    51. Re:Word unlocked. by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Pol Pot really only controlled Cambodia for about 4 years, though, not a particularly lengthy reign. The rest of the time he was head of the Khmer Rouge, before 1975 and after 1979, they were a guerrilla group not actually in control of the country.

    52. Re:Word unlocked. by Megol · · Score: 1

      The third very likely possibility: Kim Jong Un is just the figure head of the state due to his lineage from his godlike predecessors without any real power.

    53. Re:Word unlocked. by BigFire · · Score: 1

      As Christopher Hitchen once said, it is as if someone in North Korea have thought 1984 is a good template on how to run a country and give it a good college try.

    54. Re:Word unlocked. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      helped by the Nazi controlled police arresting or in some cases killing opposition MP's

    55. Re:Word unlocked. by MacDork · · Score: 1

      What makes you think we haven't read it? It's been a few years since I last read it. 1984 is free online.

    56. Re:Word unlocked. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The Nazi party won the most seats of any party in the reichstag in consecutive elections. Never a majority, but that's still winning the right to be chancellor, which was a more important position than president.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    57. Re:Word unlocked. by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "The purpose of a president is not to wield power, but to distract attention from those who do"

      When you realise that Dear Uncle was the guy who took down the general who started shelling South Korean islands last year (and a number of the general's body guards were killed in the takedown) and that the general in question was part of the (still powerful) Old Guard, then you realise that the figurehead supposition has legs.

      It's also worth bearing in mind that Kim Jong Fatboy is only the corporeal leader. His grandfather is still officially in charge and we all know what happens when people in power claim to be channelling non-corporeal beings.

    58. Re:Word unlocked. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Hitler did not win any election.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_presidential_election,_1932

      That's an odd claim, given that he won this one.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_March_1933

    59. Re: Word unlocked. by Nimey · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, he killed the guy who killed Hitler.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    60. Re:Word unlocked. by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      so, chancellor is like speaker of the house?

    61. Re:Word unlocked. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. The Romans did this kind of thing, too. For example, Sulla did this with Gaius Marius.

      My original thought was that any despotic system with one person having absolute power tends to produce these types of results. Then I remembered that Marius was during the Roman Republic.

      So I revised my thought to: This is what humans do on occasion.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    62. Re:Word unlocked. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      +1 for SNL reference.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    63. Re:Word unlocked. by Optali · · Score: 1

      I have an Orwellian hangover mate!!!

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    64. Re:Word unlocked. by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      the point is that it DOESN'T MATTER what the charges were. we executed somebody for "disloyalty".. don't let you be next.

      The problem is that it only works for so long. You can only grab and execute random members of your staff so many times. They begin lying about each other first, then a few people have enough lies going their way to take you out while your "closest staff" steps aside while they depose you. Just like Julius Caesar, the first knife comes from the person you trusted most.. because they gotta save THEMSELVES from you.

    65. Re:Word unlocked. by gmueckl · · Score: 1

      No, its the head of the executive branch similar to the US President or UK Prime Minister. Chancellor is just a German name for that position.

      --
      http://www.moonlight3d.eu/
    66. Re:Word unlocked. by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      then what does the president do?

    67. Re:Word unlocked. by gmueckl · · Score: 1

      He is the head of the state. Similar separations of offices exist in other countries. The Weimar constitution did give the President a lot of powers, for instance, to declare a state of emergency and to take any emergency measures he deems necessary. This was a loophole that was exploited by Hitler.

      The successor of the that constitution removed almost all remaining powers from the President. This is a mostly representative role these days with very little freedom for making decisions. Most of his tasks (appointing the Chancellor and Ministers, signing laws etc.) are strictly mandated by the constitution. The only exception I know is that he may call the "Bundesverfassungsgericht" (special court ruling on matters related to the constitution) before signing a law if there are serious doubts about the law being in accordance with the constitution.

      --
      http://www.moonlight3d.eu/
    68. Re:Word unlocked. by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      if he can appoint the chancellor, that seems like a big effing deal. and if he's directly elected by the citizens then it is important as well.

  2. Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Funny

    They exercised his right to a speedy trial all right.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by bob_super · · Score: 2

      The moment guilt is obvious, what's the point of spending 15 years on death row and cost millions in tax dollars?

    2. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by turgid · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if they'd kept him alive a few days longer, they could have thought of even more guilt for him to have. It all sounds a bit amateurish to me.

    3. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by Beavertank · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Due process, for one. And the fact that guilt is rarely obvious enough to justify a lightning quick death.

    4. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Even cheaper and faster, you don't have to wait for guilt to be obvious... or true.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Relax. This is a dictatorship. They can keep convicting of crimes and adding more death sentences until the Sun burns out.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Informative

      The moment guilt is obvious, what's the point of spending 15 years on death row and cost millions in tax dollars?

      I won't comment on North Korea, but in the USA there have been at least 311 cases where "guilt was obvious" but in fact the person had not committed the crime they were convicted of.

      If you're willing to accept that your proposal would cause the state-sponsored killing of hundreds of innocent people, okay, but you should say so explicitly.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    7. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 2

      The crime was probably pissing off King Fatass. In that case, guilt would be pretty obvious.

    8. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by Desler · · Score: 2

      Because there are numerous cases of people being wrongfully convicted and/or executed despite everything thinking their guilt was obvious?

    9. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The people advocating such schemes tend not to be 'willing to accept' so much as 'overtly gleeful about' a bit of the old collateral damage, so long as it isn't real people or anything.

    10. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by bob_super · · Score: 3

      I guess my sarcasm didn't show. I should have put "obvious" between quotes. We are talking about a son and grandson of dictators.

      I am actually against both the death penalty and life without parole, but I do recognize that in the rare exceptions of some truly over-the-top crimes where the defendant is very proud of his guilt, it should be both available and a whole lot quicker.
      A lot of the innocence project's work was on crimes where I do believe the death penalty should be applicable. The US system is broken. There's a reason why so many states have banned the death penalty.

    11. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      They exercised his right to a speedy trial all right.

      A good thing here. You can bet he didn't have a friend in the world those last 4 days.

    12. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by gagol · · Score: 1

      You vastly underestimate the value of propaganda : "NO ONE is untouchable, I rule and you collectively suck it" PR was invented by the nephew of Sigmund Freud (Edward Brenaise?) for the profit of american industrialists following the first world war. Hitler was inspired by it. In north america it is as prevalent as anywhere else, just better managed by a couple magnitude.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    13. Re:Arrest To Death in 4 Days for J.S. Thaek by zsau · · Score: 1

      If you're capable of keeping someone alive and everyone else safe for fifteen years on death row, why bother killing them *then*? You've demonstrated they're no threat to anyone else for that time.

      --
      Look out!
  3. History repeating itself? by aphelion_rock · · Score: 5, Informative

    "is widely being interpreted as an attempt by Kim Jong Un to keep officials loyal and scared."

    Sounds like Stalin all over again....

    "The purge was motivated by the desire to remove dissenters from the Communist Party and to consolidate the authority of Joseph Stalin. " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge

    1. Re:History repeating itself? by Beavertank · · Score: 1

      Well, the USSR was also an authoritarian state whose leaders remained in power through a combination of fear and enforced ignorance among the population, so it shouldn't be too surprising that another state run in much the same way follows a similar trend. Especially since North Korea is like the USSR on steroids in that respect.

    2. Re:History repeating itself? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      And considering that Kim Il Sung was installed into power by Joseph Stalin, it is even less surprising.

    3. Re:History repeating itself? by mbkennel · · Score: 1


      Like the USSR on steroids? More like the USSR on adulterated PCP.

      The USSR sort of worked and had excellent physical science.

    4. Re:History repeating itself? by dido · · Score: 1

      Stalin did exactly the same thing to Commisar Nikolai Yezhov after his fall from grace. They purged him from all official records and even went as far as photoshopping (much harder before digital photography) pictures of Stalin and Yezhov so that the latter disappeared.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    5. Re:History repeating itself? by JimCanuck · · Score: 1

      Kinda like how Syngman Rhee was installed into power by the Americans? Who ended up killing a few hundred thousand Koreans before the Korean War broke out to solidify his power base as well?

  4. Slashdot isn't the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Uh... Slashdot is on the Internet last time I checked, and this article RIGHT HERE mentions Jang Song Thaek, so I'm pretty sure he was not "erased from the Internet".

    1. Re:Slashdot isn't the Internet? by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 2

      All internet that they have control over. Don't be obtuse.

    2. Re:Slashdot isn't the Internet? by gagol · · Score: 1

      The OP is technically and historically relevant. just because something is banned in a localized region does not mean (anymore) that they are erased from history. Just like secret wars of the US are secrets only the its citizens, the truth exist somewhere out there.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  5. Re:Obummer's exit plan by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How soon before what's left of your pathetic, useless brain leaks out the one nostril you don't pick?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  6. Re:House of Cards by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, my heart goes out for Kim Jong Un, truly a victim of circumstance...

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. obligatory statement to the NK noobs by themushroom · · Score: 1

    "That's not how the Internet works."

    Oh sure, the locals (not having ample Internet, and being fed the story by speakers across the countryside) might think his uncle that taught him his tricks was a traitor scumdog etcetera because that's the story Kim Jong-Un has concocted recently, but the rest of the world hasn't lost their copies of the newspaper, the stories that are on the websites, and other proofs of concept that Photoshop or a text editor aren't going to negate from the other 99% of the world's media.

  8. giving new meaning to the phrase by themushroom · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You have disappointed me. From hereon: You're dead to me."

    1. Re:giving new meaning to the phrase by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      Jang: That's all well and good, but do I really have to be dead to everyone else?!

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  9. Re:House of Cards by bondsbw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe if he killed himself, everyone would win.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  10. Re: Word unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In china, they have whole departments for the social networks to delete posts containing certain phrases. Like entire buildings full of people monitoring what they are saying, and deciphering codes just so they can control what people talk about.

    Literally deleted within 15 minutes.

  11. Re:News? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    The news is that North Korea has an internet from which it can erase that information.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  12. Stalin? by SuperCharlie · · Score: 1

    I think it was Stalin who erased people from existence. paintings, books, tax roles, every mention in every place. Very thorough, and very very paranoid.

  13. Hong Kong Phooey by themushroom · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't someone karate chop his goofy ass out of the country?

    That may have been what his uncle was trying to do.

  14. Re:Obummer's exit plan by qbzzt · · Score: 1

    Considering that the basic prerequisite for overthrowing the Republic is to gain the personal loyalty of the military (and preferably the veterans, especially in places like the US where they are armed), I'd say either "never" or "when he feels like committing suicide". The US military oath is to obey the constitution first. A president who declared himself supreme leader would suffer from a case of high velocity lead poisoning very quickly.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
  15. Re:News? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    My understanding is that the chief difference here is how publicly Jang Song Thaek was purged. He was a member (by marriage) of the Kim family itself, and the Kims have always been somewhat cautious on state media services not to impugn any of the Kims, because it risks undermining the notion that they are the rightful rulers of North Korea. Under normal circumstances it seems more likely that he would disappear; and apparently he has been sent packing a couple of times before, only to return.

    My reading of what the analysts think is that Jang Song Thaek either got to uppity (he seems to have been Kim Jong Un's mentor during the early days of his reign), or possibly was attempting some sort coup or at least end run around Kim Jong Un, and was likely not alone. Other officials have apparently disappeared as well, and this is as clear a message to any of Jang Song Thaek's as-yet undiscovered sympathizers or allies that Kim Jong Un is in charge, has the loyalty of the military, and no one, not even those in the DPRK's inner ruling circle, is immune.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  16. Jang Song Strisand? by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Funny

    I never heard of him before this article; now he's indelible.

  17. what steroids do to 'the little man' by themushroom · · Score: 1

    More like a banana republic with nukes than the USSR, but we can presume Kim has taken some historical tips.

  18. "Thaek, I find your lack of faith disturbing." by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    " I will erase even the memory of Thaek from the histories..." Anakin, Xerxes, Is there no quotable threshold this 'Un won't breech?

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  19. Re:Obummer's exit plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll take "never", for that one. Outside of diseased minds and idiot trolls, no one actually thinks that's a legitimate possibility let alone likely outcome.

    Can you say "extrajudicial killings of US citizens"?

  20. From the Internet? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1
    1. Re:From the Internet? by gagol · · Score: 1

      You blind foul.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  21. catch-22 by themushroom · · Score: 3, Funny

    You make a good point. This will be really embarassing for his memoirs: "I learned everything about leadership from my un--... uh, my dad." Of course he could spin this as having gifts from his deity since he can't admit his uncle existed and schooled him.

    Also, whatever the North Korean version of Thanksgiving will be pretty awkward from henceforth.
    "Auntie, you look good..."
    "Eat shit, you little bastard."

    1. Re:catch-22 by jma05 · · Score: 1

      You jest. But the fate that awaits his aunt is probably to be sent to an insane asylum or otherwise removed from the palace, assuming she is also not labelled a co-conspirator and later executed, depending on her level of political activeness so far.

  22. Re:Obummer's exit plan by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Senator Obama voted for warrantless NSA spying 4 months before he was elected President. Try paying attention some time.

  23. Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 2

    Look, his uncle was probably as much a despicable character as any in the NK ruling party, likely performing or being complicit in any number of crimes against humanity, so no real loss to the human race here in all likelihood. What I find disturbing though is that Jong-Un has displayed callous disregard for human life in recent months in order to maintain complete control over the population.

    I had high hopes for him when I learned that he'd been schooled in Switzerland, spoke English and had made positive comments in the past about the plight of the NK people. I figured he was young, idealistic, and maybe not all that different from myself -- had I been placed into a very difficult situation due to my family lineage. If placed in such a situation, I imagine that for a year or two I might have acted the part (whatever that means) in order to maintain control long enough to come up with a plan to bring some level of reforms to the country and ensure a longer-term transition to democracy.

    Then again, you never really hear about a dictator who had a change of heart and became 'sane' after being able to operate with complete impunity for a while. I guess it's true when they say absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    It seems that his age and boyish looks belie the fact that Jong-Il chose and groomed his successor very carefully.

    1. Re:Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      What I find disturbing though is that Jong-Un has displayed callous disregard for human life in recent months in order to maintain complete control over the population

      No different than his father or grandfather in that respect. All of them shipped men, women and children off to gulags to suffer and die. His father feasted while children starved to death...

    2. Re:Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Don't be naive. They can still blame Japan, South Korea, and the USA. It's not like North Korea's populace will know any better.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It's not like North Korea's populace will know any better.

      The leaks in that information dam have already started. Cross-border trade with China is leaking information in, which is why you hear a lot more the past few years about crackdowns on those caught listening to western media.

      The question is "how long can they keep it up".

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by dkf · · Score: 1

      The question is "how long can they keep it up".

      Probably far far longer than you'd hope, if history is anything to go by. Alas. Unless he manages to irritate China too much or decides to invade South Korea, and then you'll get a nasty war.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    5. Re:Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      The question is "how long can they keep it up".

      As long as the scumbags in China keep backing up this tyrant, he'll be able to keep it up.

    6. Re:Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Kim Jong Un was always going to be the worst kind of dictator because he's the bullied spoilt chubby-boy runt of the litter and has decades of being so to make up for now he has a position of power.

      He's North Korea's answer to Augustus Gloop from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

    7. Re:Was hopeful in Jong-Un... by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Hell, NK shelled South Korea a few years back and the world collectively wagged its finger at them.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  24. Re: Obummer's exit plan by qbzzt · · Score: 1

    The issue isn't the senior officers. It is the rank and file whose loyalty is required to overthrow the constitution.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
  25. Sympathy? by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This guy was one of the top brass in NK. Lets keep in mind how many millions of tortures and death he's likely responsible for. The worlds better off without him, and we can only hope NK becomes unstable soon. Those poor people that live there, my God. How can we still have such a place on this earth.

    1. Re:Sympathy? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Those poor people that live there, my God. How can we still have such a place on this earth.

      There are still people who believe that North Korea is closer to an ideal than Hong Kong or Belgium. Look at how excited they are about the rapid decline of Venezuela. Oh, right, the capitalists are all there sabotaging the People's Armies...

      As long as people in large groups reject reason, then other large groups of people will die for it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Sympathy? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      "Hope", "becomes unstable", and "nuclear weapons" are not concepts that belong in the same place at the same time.

    3. Re:Sympathy? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      There isn't much to compare to the horror that's going on there now. I'd hate to see their arsenal get lose but the pain and suffering happening to those people now dwarfs even the worst case scenario with the nukes.

    4. Re: Sympathy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, bullshit.

      There would be fallout, but it would be limited. South Korea would be in horrible shape. (Actually without nukes even-Seoul is in artillery range, and NK has a lot of pieces aimed at it) SK and China would have fallout, as would likely Japan. Plus potentially a few other spots, assuming: NK missiles and nukes work, US and Japanese missiles (SM3s, and the interceptors based in Alaska and California don't if targeted on the US mainland.)

      The type of dame to the world could be done, but only if the US or Russia (and possibly China) did it. 2 nukes have been used in war, but thousands have ben detonated. North Korea could probably be nearly wiped out by nukes and it still wouldn't cause that much damage to the whole world. Locally, it would be bad but over the world, no. (If radiation and mutation worked like movies, there would definitely be godzilla in Japan after that!)

    5. Re:Sympathy? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      How can we still have such a place on this earth.

      It is just one of a depressingly large number of such places.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re:Sympathy? by Xest · · Score: 1

      It's not that simple. You can have reformers inside a bad regime but it doesn't mean they're bad. Just because that regime is responsible for something does not mean everyone is complicit and supports it.

      In fact, rumours are that this guy was executed because he was negotiating with China to try and pressure the rest of North Korea to adopting Burma/China style economic reform that would open up the economy which would make the lives of those in North Korea better.

      Do you really believe it's more ethical to just quit the regime and fuck off into exile elsewhere rather than to risk your life attempting to change it from the inside? Quitting would've just bolstered Kim Jon Un unquestionably, but killing him at least makes many others question if this is a man they want to risk working under.

  26. Re:House of Cards by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

    Yes, this execution evidences some element of fear. Though we don't need to feel sorry for Kim Jong Un, I wouldn't want to be in his shoes. Dictators rarely die of natural causes.

  27. Only one reference to Memory Hole? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    My goodness, only one reference to the Memory hole? That is where erased history went in the book 1984 and this situation fits it perfectly and there is only one bloody reference. I'm disappointed.

    Oh and BTW, they aren't erasing him, only the mentions of him that were good. They broadcast live him being dragged out (by his elbows) of the politburo by soldiers.

  28. How does that work? by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Informative

    How is he supposed to serve as a lesson to others if they're busy purging all records of him?

    "Remember what happened to Jang Song Thaek before you think about crossing me!"
    "Who? I don't remember him at all."
    "Exactly!"

    Sounds a bit more like bad comedy than a real threat.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:How does that work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://scontent-b-atl.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1463232_10152049385114383_1631351356_n.jpg

    2. Re:How does that work? by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whispers are more powerful than shouts.

    3. Re:How does that work? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's not for the current generation of people alive. It's so his name can't be remembered in future generations. The current will never speak of him again. Him and his legacy is to be erased from existence. It's about political power and the projection of it to others!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  29. You'll never understand until you experience it by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The term 'Orwellian' tends to be overused a bit these days. But, having read 1984, this is something straight out of that book

    Millions of Jews died in the hand of the Nazis. Those who went through holocaust hell but survived fully comprehend the meaning of "LIBERTY".

    Many people tried to scale the Berlin wall but was shot to death. Those who were successful fully appreciate the importance of "LIBERTY".

    Some brave souls from North Korea risk everything and went through a very dangerous journey crossing the very heavily guarded border into China. To them, "LIBERTY" is worth much more than all the gold in the world.

    They do not need "1984" to tell them the horror. They have experience it first hand.

    I had befriended several holocaust survivors when I was in the United States (back when many of them were still alive, in the 70's) and I found that, for them, the same thing happen : Mere words could never justify the horrors that they had gone through.

    The scars that they had was much worse than the scars that I have. They had their family slaughtered right in front of them, and yet, when I asked them to describe how they feel, they just shook their head.

    They couldn't.

    It's not the "hurt" that stopped them from telling me what happened. It's that SPOKEN WORDS itself is not sufficient.

    Now, when I see people like you justifying your "understanding" the horror with a fiction, I sadly shake my head.

    "1984" is but an old fiction.

    You guys might find it useful, but to us who had been through the horror, that book does not even come close to the actual experience.

    To us, "LIBERTY" means much more than life itself.

    To some of you, that word is, a word.

    That is why I mourn for the loss of "LIBERTY" of the United States of America but too many born and bred Americans themselves don't even understand what they have lost.

    I humbly ask for your forgiveness because English is not my mother tongue. There are times, like now, I am at a total loss of words to describe how I feel.

    All I can say is this --- You will never understand the importance of "LIBERTY" until you have lost it.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:You'll never understand until you experience it by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're being a dick. I understood exactly what he meant.

    2. Re:You'll never understand until you experience it by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      The term 'Orwellian' tends to be overused a bit these days. But, having read 1984, this is something straight out of that book

      Millions of Jews died in the hand of the Nazis. Those who went through holocaust hell but survived fully comprehend the meaning of "LIBERTY".

      You haven't read 1994.

      On the whole it involved three countries, two were always against the third.
      Then without warning the enemy became an ally, and good all about the other country(ies) were expunged.

      In this case it is a good analogy.

      -------

      I had a girlfriend who had chronic pain, not having any pain I never understood how she felt.

    3. Re:You'll never understand until you experience it by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1984 is a way to help those who don't know the definition to understand. You find it offensive that someone might understand liberty without having gone through what you did?

    4. Re:You'll never understand until you experience it by Guru80 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever read the book? The reference to 1984 in this instance is in regards to the "Ministry of Truth" in which every day the changed history in all written communication as they are doing with the Fat Leader's uncle.

    5. Re:You'll never understand until you experience it by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yah, I can see why that coward posted anonymously. I'm sure he would be a well-recognized dick if he had posted under his username.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  30. Re:Obummer's exit plan by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

    You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FISA_Amendments_Act_of_2008

  31. New Meme by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    The Evil Bert meme can be extended so Kim Jong Un's Uncle shows up in various photos on the internet. That should drive the pudgy dictator nuts!

  32. Last pic of uncle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1380112/north-koreas-execution-kims-uncle-jang-will-test-ties-china

  33. He wanted people to know about it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    The government turned the electricity on so people could watch him being dragged out of the meeting on TV.

  34. No fool by waimate · · Score: 5, Funny

    That Kim Jong Un is no fool. When executing relatives, always do it just *before* xmas, not *after*. That way you save on buying a present.

    1. Re:No fool by pellik · · Score: 1

      It's not that simple. Delay too long and you may need a present should the execution be botched. Too early and they wont have bought your present yet.

  35. who? by thewolfkin · · Score: 2

    wait they killed who? I don't know anyone by that name.

    --
    Just another second banana
  36. "Eraser" by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    "You've just been erased..."

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    1. Re:"Eraser" by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      In these situations, I prefer the term "rubbed out".

  37. Re:Obummer's exit plan by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You modern right-wingers collectively can't muster the balls of Timothy McVeigh (who failed to kickstart anything because the rest of you are gutless) so all you do is snivel on the internet, forward Faux News articles, and grumble like a bunch of blue-haired biddies in your little circle jerk of mutual affirmation.

    You don't do shit, so quit bitching. You rant about the "Greatest Generation" but you aren't a bump on their collective posterior.

    YOUR GOPs relentless incompetence and pathetic candidates are why Obama (who I also dislike) is in office in the first place! YOU got him elected twice.

    The refusal of modern so-called "conservatism" to do anything other than preach like the White Trash Christian Taliban you are at heart while gargling the balls of rich people who wouldn't be caught dead with you is a disgrace.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  38. Re:House of Cards by real+gumby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dictators rarely die of natural causes

    His father and grandfather died in the saddle of natural causes.

    And actually, unfortunately, plenty of others do too, e.g. Franco, Salazar, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot... And if you include the ones ousted but not killed (e.g. Duvalier, Amin, Pinochet) the list gets even longer.

    (not killing dictators is actually important because if killing them is the only way to get rid of them they will hold on more tightly. The means of bribing them by letting them keep some ill-gotten gains is justified by the ends).

  39. Enforced Ignorance by srobert · · Score: 1

    "Enforced Ignorance", what an interesting term. In the U.S., ignorance isn't actively enforced, but education is widely discouraged.

    1. Re:Enforced Ignorance by harperska · · Score: 2

      "Schooling" is mandatory. "Education" on the other hand often seems to be actively discouraged.

  40. Due Process by srobert · · Score: 1

    Due process, The North Koreans have apparently eliminated such inefficiency from their system. A shame to let them get ahead of us in that.

  41. Re:House of Cards by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

    You seem to be keeping score better than I have; perhaps I overstated it by saying "rarely". However, I tend to think more of such notables as Hitler, Mussolini, Ceauescu, Saddam Hussein, and Gaddafi, who all died untimely deaths from the hazards of the job. (And they never even lived to get workman's comp for their trouble.)

    Generally speaking, one seems to stand a better chance if one doesn't invade other countries, which is a mistake several of the preceding made - and which the most longstanding dictator of modern times, Castro, notably hasn't made. The Kims also seem to have used this technique to their advantage - maybe with a pinch of missiles and nuclear weapons thown in. The latter is largely an unproven technique, though it arguably worked for Stalin.

    Regardless, I still don't like the odds. So, I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of The Party for another term as your dictator.

  42. Have we heard the method of execution? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I recall hearing Kim Jong-Un already had someone executed by artillery in the recent past. I'm curious to know if he tried to top that with this one.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  43. I'm confused by koan · · Score: 2

    If they are all scared of the fat little shit why doesn't someone just shoot him.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  44. Re:House of Cards by real+gumby · · Score: 1

    You seem to be keeping score better than I have

    Well, everyone needs a hobby. My other is the Missing Children -- I have quite a collection!

  45. Re:Obummer's exit plan by Jack9 · · Score: 3, Informative

    > And? Check the official vote rolls [senate.gov]. He didn't vote for it. His name isn't even in the list. Want to try again?

    Please try to get the facts correct.

    The FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (also called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008, H.R. 6304

    The roll call is here:
    http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00168 (vote 168 not 236 which you linked to)

    His name is on that list from 2008. You linked to the extension vote in 2012...of course his name isn't on it as a voting SENATOR.
    Obama's the PRESIDENT at that time.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  46. Re:Obummer's exit plan by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Fuck you, fuck you twice. I no of no one who thinks that's a realistic possibility. Do no project your demented idea of what others are like upon them.

  47. To quote asgard supreme commander by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    "The North Koreans possess no such technology"

  48. Re: Obummer's exit plan by gagol · · Score: 1

    The only reason the constitution gets violated so much today, is because the american people are lazy ass bastards thet prefer to take care of themselves instead of fighting for the common good. This applies to most countries tough, including mine.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  49. Re:Obummer's exit plan by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Say what you will of the GOP. But I find it especially revealing how it's the right wings fault for not convincing/educating the unwashed masses to not vote for Obama. And you would be correct. We did failed to stop ignorance.

    Evil prevails when good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  50. Re:House of Cards by gagol · · Score: 1

    Suicide by firing squad, real classy.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  51. Re:House of Cards by gagol · · Score: 1

    You know what, a citizen from Quebec got bared from travel for a more frivolous tweet than your post. I respect your courage. Mike (talking to my NSA friend here) you are invited for dinner next Saturday in my country house. You know how to contact me.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  52. Re:Obummer's exit plan by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    LOL. "Gutless" conservatives? The moment that conservatives actually did something the media would be all over them like stink on shit, telling the world that they're terrorists no better than McVeigh. You remember McVeigh? Executed.

    It is rather telling that you think that a terror campaign would be a good choice for the Right...you must know something they don't. I also like the "white trash" bigoted comment, shows your true colors. Stay classy!

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  53. Re:Remembers me of the movie The Dictator by gagol · · Score: 1

    I bet 20$ the uncle was not present at said celebrations.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  54. Re:Obummer's exit plan by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    To be clear

    "To be clear" seems to be Obama's way of saying, "I am about to be unclear."

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  55. Re:Same difference. by gagol · · Score: 1

    But its ability to selectively document or revise history is not something unique to NK.

    History is your friend. When NK was created, US still had segregation going on. Then selective neutering of population and general bio/chem/atomic weapon testing its and canada's citizens done in the name of NATIONAL SECURITY. To this day, we still have to get justice for these acts. We live in a cocoon, but we pissed off many people building our empire, everything have a price, someday.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  56. FB by Waldeinburg · · Score: 2

    They also deleted his Facebook profile ... oh wait, they can't.

  57. I haven't read "1984" ?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    You haven't read 1994

    When I enrolled into the university in America back in the early 1970's my English needed a boost, so they put me into some "intensive English program", something like the ESL classes of today

    In the classes the instructor asked us to read "Animal Farm", "1984" and stuffs like that and that we had to write report and do presentation (kinda like show and tell) in front of the class

    In other words, I not only read "1984", I read that fiction __before_i>_ the year of 1984

    I do not know which year you were born, but there is a possibility that when I read that book, you were not born yet.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:I haven't read "1984" ?? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Hello there... can you suggest a good movie or story that accurately or sufficiently describes what life was like in East Germany? 1984 might work for extreme situations like North Korea, but I think what we're headed for here in the U.S. is something a bit more subtle.

  58. Re:House of Cards by subreality · · Score: 1

    not killing dictators is actually important because if killing them is the only way to get rid of them they will hold on more tightly. The means of bribing them by letting them keep some ill-gotten gains is justified by the ends

    Putting aside the moral argument, I disagree with the practical effect. Providing a way out might encourage the current tyrant to retire peacefully, but it also makes the position more appealing to the next ten guys who want to take his place.

  59. Re:Obummer's exit plan by xyzzymage · · Score: 2

    The reason Obama won each time wasn't because an insufficient number of people didn't trust/like him -- it's the "lesser evil"voting method at work. It's a lot like the old joke about being in a crowd chased by a monster:the folks that survive aren't all the fastest, they're simply not the slowest.

    In 2008, the Democratic Party was dangerously split by hostility between Obama's & Clinton's fans, and the Left was further fractured by the voters angry over Democrat politicians not living up to their pledge to change things. The GOPlost that time because of the damage Bush/Cheney had caused and because the GOP's candidates were literally considered laughably awful.

    In 2012, Left-leaning voters were extremely angry over the performance both Obama *and*the other Democrats had given over the previous four years. There was a very real chance that the Democrats were going to lose...but because the Right-Wing politicians had managed to make their side look like it would've probably caused even more damage, the GOP once again lost.

    That's the reason that the guy you're responding to blamed the GOP for putting Obama in power -- it could've convinced any number of people that the guy wasn't a great candidate, but it *couldn't* convince them that its own candidates weren't worse in one way or another. It's something to keep in mind in the near future, too; 2016 will be here before we know it...

  60. Arrest to execution in four days? by Snufu · · Score: 2

    North Korea doesn't have a death row. It's more like a death toboggan chute.

    1. Re:Arrest to execution in four days? by dkf · · Score: 1

      North Korea doesn't have a death row. It's more like a death toboggan chute.

      They sure took their time then. My impression of NK was that the accusation-execution interval was usually shorter than that. They must've really wanted to make an example of him.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  61. Re:House of Cards by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    If I have to remind you again to use my alias, I will be forced to thaek your life. Sincerely yours, Mike.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  62. Who is more linked in? by Suomi-Poika · · Score: 1

    Jang Sung-taek lifted himself to the power in his 20s via marriage. It is safe to say that he has had 40 years to build social networks within the North Korean elite.

    Kim Jong Un is a heir to a communist tyrant but we didn't hear from him until 2009. It is quite safe to assume that he has had only four years of time to make alliances with the North Korean elite, military and Workers party - and only two years as a ruler.

    Jang Sung-taeks network of people was most likely within the Workers Party of North Korea.

    I would say that people who knew Jang Sung-taek is most likely in thousands and people who valued him is also very high. My guess is that now the fat boy has to be extra paranoid - he can not possibly know the extent of J.S-t's social network. Some of J-S.t's friend may have guns, or just a knives, and as we can see Kim Jong Un is not fat enough to be stab proof. I am expecting that North Korea may go to a bloody revolt after all.

  63. Speculation by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    He murdered his uncle for political reasons and doesn't want everyone to know about it, that kind of behaviour predates 1984 by several millennia.

    Actually, we don't really know that. We are too far removed from it. It could also be that somebody else had his uncle murdered to show him what could happen to him, or to punish him, or otherwise keep him in line. The Uncle would be an obvious target for that kind of move.

    1. Re:Speculation by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The uncle is not blood, the aunt is his dad's sister, her and the uncle split up not that long before the execution.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  64. Excessively Ruthless Leaders by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    Putin. Kaderov. Omar al-Bashir. To name three in power at the moment.

  65. Re: Obummer's exit plan by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    You're reading way too much into it. Look, it's real simple this time. Obama won on "like-ability", not capability.

    Read up on the JFK / Nixon debate of 1960. Those that heard it on the radio thought Nixon was the better candidate on ideas alone. Yet those that watched it on TV hands down thought JFK won. JFK looked handsome and sat with a calm confident posture. Nixon was recovering from previous hospitalization. Proof that image is everything in an election!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  66. Re:Obummer's exit plan by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

    It's either, "lesser evil", or "the devil we know." People were fearful of Romney because they didn't know him. Their ignorance allowed them to assume the worst based on his wealth, no-context statements, and political talking points. And of course he's a Republican who designed something very similar to the Affordable Care Act. That's a double strike. Democrats couldn't vote for him because he was too easy to illustrate as a wealthy Republican cartoon character, and Republicans couldn't vote for him because he did the same thing Obama did. Never-mind what was written by the Heritage Foundation in the 90s, now anything similar to the ACA is radioactive.

    I voted for Romney, but it was a hard vote. I didn't like either option, but fear was enough for me to break my promise to vote third party. These days I recognize that it doesn't matter who the President is. Politicians spend all their lives making themselves look good by publicly saying and doing whatever it is the people like, then when they're elected to the top-office, they do whatever they want. It happens repeatedly and everywhere. When it comes to elections, the votes that really matter are for your Representatives and Senators... but for how long is anybodies guess, since they're losing power and legitimacy.

    In 2016 Hillary Clinton will be elected. The whole Benghazi thing has successfully been illustrated as a tin-foil hat conspiracy thing. The official line that there was nothing anybody could do, not the Marines, and much less our top diplomat, is the line that has won out. No candidate stands a chance against a Clinton. As president what she'd do is anyone's guess, though I would hope that we don't have a rubber-stamp legislative and judicial branch by that time.

  67. Welcome to North Korea by Guru80 · · Score: 1

    Where they pride themselves on the use of Orwell's 1984 as the standard operating manual of State propaganda.

  68. Re: Obummer's exit plan by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Read up on Luntz's Dunces back in fall 2012 and pair that up with the GALLUP numbers at the time. Almost split in difference, most people had already made up their mind. However a massive double-digit of independent voters were rocking back and forth right up to election. A wild card.

    Let's focus on that last group for a moment. What Luntz showed on TV was that the independent voter was making decisions based on feelings, not facts. Their options swayed back and forth like seaweed in shallow ocean waters. Back and forth, back and forth. For this very large representative group, it was driven purely on emotion.

    So basically the decision was largely on tribalism and emotion. Competency was way at the bottom of the list for most Americans.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  69. Re:Since when have I used the word "offensive" ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    The quotes and bolding around liberty seemed to indicate you thought nobody else understood it. The sheer repetition indicated you thought nobody understood it. I have never experienced a "real" loss of liberty. But I fled from the US. I recognize what was lost, and I expect it will take a bloody civil war to get it back, and that is both unlikely and devastating were it to happen, so the only rational course for anyone in the US who likes liberty is to leave.

    Yes, the US doesn't have issues like others have. I know someone that fled *to* the US (the same place I fled from). His brother was killed by death squads in a Central American civil war. Because he was brothers with a revolutionary, his name was on the list. So he packed up everything he owned and his family, and illegally crossed into the US. He managed to eventually get citizenship. The people in the US talk about freedom, and have policies about taking in political prisoners, but it's all a sham.

    But now I have "no liberty" on the twisted US scale because I'd need a permit just to buy a gun. Very few (almost no) eligible people are refused, but the fact I'd have to apply seems to indicate that I have no freedom at all, based on US conservative standards.

  70. Re:House of Cards by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Kim Jong Un grew up in fucking Switzerland. If he wanted out, he had his chance to get out.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  71. Re:Since when have I used the word "offensive" ? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

    The fact that you posted anon made me wonder if you were the OP (Taco Cowboy). As did the use of the colloquialism for someone who asked forgiveness for English being a second language for him.

    I'm not trying to be pedantic here. The point (continues) to be, on a broader level, that it's harder to convey anything, especially emotions, via the written word. It's easy to misinterpret the written word (note the unintentional information that your post conveyed to me).

    Enough of the discussion about the discussion. Back to the important subject, I was thinking about your statement "I was sad that people having to rely on an old fiction to understand the true nature of the human society."

    In a way, it's sort of a good thing. It means times have been good. We should aspire to longer and longer periods of "good times". And the memories of the bad times will only be available via the written word (and other media, of course, which may change the equation some).

    Of course, a problem is that once we lose that emotional, visceral feeling, we go back to doing the things that lead to the bad times.

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  72. Re:House of Cards by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

    Sometimes people make bad decisions. Even dictators.

  73. Re:Obummer's exit plan by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Notice that there were no more Wacos or Ruby Ridges after OK City? Sometimes force works. "Class" is bullshit when class doesn't succeed.

    Of course mainly what I'm getting at is the all talk and zero action aspect of modern conservatards.

    The lefty kids in the 1960s who had the balls to protest even when that ensured they'd be teargassed and beaten had the guts to keep doing it. The anti-WTO folks still do, but I don't see shit from the old Rightist gummers. The talk doesn't match the action!

    If you SAY that Obama is the Antichrist and the end of the Republic then FAIL to act, that makes you a hypocrite.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."