Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Life After N900?

Rydia writes "Since it first released, I have been in love with my Nokia N900, and it has satisfied all my needs for a mobile with a high degree of control and utility. Sadly, the little guy is showing his age, both in battery life (even with the powersaving kernel options enabled), and performing in general has been left far, far in the dust by phones that are now considered quite old. The time has come to find its successor, but after a thorough search of smartphone options, I can't find any handset that offers everything for the power user that the N900 did (much less a hardware keyboard). I'd like to avoid supporting Google/Android, but there don't seem to be many options. Have any other techies found a replacement for their N900?"

303 comments

  1. Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can replace the standard Google Android software with a completely Google-free custom ROM, if you like. You can also get Ubuntu Touch.

    1. Re:Get a Nexus device by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      "You can also get Ubuntu Touch."

      Spoken just like someone that has not used Ubuntu Touch.

      If you dont like to make or receive phone calls, Use ubuntu touch.
      If you dont like internet connectivity Use ubuntu touch.
      If you LIKE your phone locking up, Use ubuntu touch.

      Also when you actually look at ubuntu touch, it's just Android with a UI stapled on top but with no apps, and no functionality.

      What he is after is a Nexus 5 that has a pure android on it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd like to avoid supporting Google/Android

      Why? Is there something technical you're opposed to or is this simply a case of "I hate Big Corp X"? I'm not trolling, but frankly speaking I can't think of any reason to hate Google that doesn't lead one to also hate Apple or Microsoft, and that pretty much rules out your options for smartphones. If you simply dislike them then fine, but without telling us WHAT it is you dislike or WHY you're avoiding that company, we really can't make any adequate suggestions as to an alternative.

    3. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What he is after is a Nexus 5 that has a pure android on it.

      You can not seriously suggest to replace Maemo with the utter crap that Android is (Linux kernel + Dalvik VM).

    4. Re:Get a Nexus device by dremon · · Score: 1

      The only valid point is the absence of apps. The rest was true a year ago.

    5. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't think of any reason to hate Google that doesn't lead one to also hate Apple or Microsoft, and that pretty much rules out your options for smartphones.

      I think that pretty much was his problem. Depending on how much he wants to avoid those Openmoko might be his only hope.

    6. Re:Get a Nexus device by nej_simon · · Score: 1

      Also when you actually look at ubuntu touch, it's just Android with a UI stapled on top ...

      No it's not. Not since the early preview builds.

    7. Re:Get a Nexus device by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The rest was true on the October release when I tried it last. and they have not released anything different cince then then. Last time I tried to compile a daily release it refused to compile, at that point I walked away from it as something that is worthless.

      Phone calls are #1 priority, and an incoming phone call MUST have absolute priority over all other parts of the OS. These developers dont know that, the craptastic OpenMoko phone from a few years ago had the same problems. I honestly would give an app 2 rings to die and release control, on ring #3 all apps not sleeping should be violently killed by the OS, and reported to the mothership that it is misbehaving causing a UI problem to the phone.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't speak for OP, but there are definitely plenty of reasons to dislike Google. Certainly, the same apply just as much to Apple and Microsoft. However, there *are* alternatives. Personally I'm quite fond of my Jolla.

    9. Re:Get a Nexus device by SomeoneFromBelgium · · Score: 2

      Well for me, I also try to avoid android. Not because I have an aversion against google (my enthousiasm since the first gmail account has cooled but has not turned to hatered or anything).

      I simply don't seem to find my way around an android device very well.

      I have currently a nokia N9 and I could imagine switching to windows phone, but android allways throws me off. No matter how may layers of UI they put on top of it, it never seems to give me an aura of simplicity. My wife has an android based phone. She is regularly puzzeled and muttering things like "why isn't this working". But contrary to me she just carries on and works around it.

    10. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't think of any reason to hate Google that doesn't lead one to also hate Apple or Microsoft, and that pretty much rules out your options for smartphones.

      This is why I'm not going to buy one in the foreseeable future.

    11. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple, Microsoft, and Google are not the only options for smartphones. They are the three biggest, with alternatives occupying particularly small niche markets. Jolla is probably the fourth, and is likely what the original poster is looking for, if he's not interested in some of the de-googling you can do to Android devices.

    12. Re:Get a Nexus device by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu Touch isn't ready for prime time yet. I'm hoping that it will be in better shape by the time the official 14.04 release comes out in April; right now I can only recommend it to developers and curious hackers. I have it installed on a Galaxy Nexus but that is no longer my primary phone.

      Firefox OS is another open source OS for phones. It is less ambitious than Ubuntu Touch so it's not likely to scratch the itch of the OP. Their focus is on devices specifically designed for it (most of which are rather low-end) rather than on doing builds for phones that can be reflashed, though there is an unofficial build for the Nexus 4.

    13. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok then, he can just keep his N900. Problem solved.

    14. Re:Get a Nexus device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you don;t really want linux, just want your phone to look like it, then install ubuntu touch.

    15. Re:Get a Nexus device by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      I can understand wanting to get away from google. Whether apple or microsoft are also guility is different, with them you are atleast the customer, you pay them for services and software; however with google you are the product and google sells you to all their customers (other big evil corporations). Now if google had the same integrity they seemed to have at the start, you might be more inclined to keep on going with the deal; but with them taking ownership of your email and mining it for data, forcing everyone onto google+, the locking down of android, buying double click, killing of projects that arn't profitable enough, i can easily understand peoples fears.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
  2. Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Buying an andriod phone doesn't really mean supporting google.

    1. Re: Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This has already been debunked as false, so stop repeating it.

    2. Re:Android by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you buy it. Not everyone bends over for the G.

      And you are actually paying for Google services, play is just part of that.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Android by CdBee · · Score: 2

      especially so if you buy one of the many chinese phones sold as carrier-own handsets in Europe (most made by ZTE) - pretty good average spec, much faster than an N900, better screens, fairly minimal Android installs

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    4. Re:Android by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2

      Buying an andriod phone doesn't really mean supporting google.

      Yeah, it does. You then get fully monetized by the Google ad collective even mores than non-Android users. TAANSTAFL.

    5. Re:Android by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It's just illegal for an OEM to install Play without a GMS license, which is free to get, but they need to pay for testing from an approved tester.

    6. Re:Android by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

      In most of the cases it means supporting windows because of dirty patents agreements ...
      So although I do not know the solution I understand the GGP's feelings..

    7. Re:Android by used2win32 · · Score: 1

      And when buying Android you get to support Microsoft to the tune of 2 billion dollars per year.

      LINK | LINK 2 | LINK 3

      --
      Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
    8. Re:Android by dwater · · Score: 1

      I think that's not true, since not all Andoird phones come with Google Play - I can't even install it on my ZTE Geek, though I'd be happy to find out how to do so. I can install Amazon's equivalents and it comes with some other store(s) too, so I don't feel like I'm missing much.

      --
      Max.
    9. Re:Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if this were true, I'd rather have 75 cents (not %) go to Google as oppose to 30% of everything (including furniture or anything you purchase off of Amazon) inside an app going to the company I bought the device from.

    10. Re:Android by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 1

      It is entirely possible to run an Android phone without any use of Google whatsoever.

    11. Re:Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to agree with you, but note with displeasure that core functionality of the OS is being moved into the Google Play Services framework, with the result that bugs in original features are not being fixed if there is an alternative API provided by Play. E.g. bug 577072.

    12. Re:Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to agree with you, but note with displeasure that core functionality of the OS is being moved into the Google Play Services framework, with the result that bugs in original features are not being fixed if there is an alternative API provided by Play. E.g. bug 577072.

      Erm. I meant bug 57707. The 2 was caused by me not pressing shift when I was trying to close the quote on my URL.

      (Captcha: superego. WTF?)

    13. Re:Android by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      That just means you're supporting them more. Not only do you indirectly pay for it, you're not consuming any of their resources.

    14. Re:Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you don't use Google's services. Avoiding them takes a bit of work on stock Android, but can be done. Or you can install a third-party ROM for your Android phone that doesn't include Google's services to start with.

  3. Google and Android by jones_supa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd like to avoid supporting Google/Android, but there don't seem to be many options.

    Why against Google and Android?

    1. Re:Google and Android by pitchpipe · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why against Google and Android?

      Maybe because he doesn't like the idea of his private life being a product that is sold to the highest bidder? Just a guess.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    2. Re:Google and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Absolutely fair, but just get CyanogenMod or flash stock any AOSP ROM without Google Apps and you're good to go. I'm assuming the author is capable of doing this because the N900 requires some technical skills to really enjoy anyways.

    3. Re:Google and Android by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey asshole, we pay you good money to astroturf Slashdot.

      Include the fucking scroogled tag line next time or you're fucking fired!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Google and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd that you're excluding some of the even more hypocritical corporations out there -- Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, Oracle, etc. The conservative media and Libertarian viewpoint is clearly anti-Google these days but 'biggest' hypocrite ever??? Re-writing history is a very common practice for the ideologically challenged but it should be noted there's a lot of debatable points for and against Google at this point. Which of the other tech world giants has spent their own money to set up fiber connections at consumer level pricing, proving that Big Telecom is lying when it states that it's impossible to do even though BT has the added benefit of using the publicly funded infrastructure to operate on top of? Which of those tech world giants used their own funds to fight against MPEG-LA, a consortium of corporations set up to keep proprietary, pay-for media codecs ingrained throughout the entire Internet? Which of those tech world giants fund something like 'Summer of Code', paying interns to help support Open Source projects with development needs? And while Microsoft hides behind a vaguely legal EULA and Facebook deceives all it's users with a hideously complicated and continuously changing Privacy/Security menu, at least Google moved to a plain-English Terms of Use policy when it opted to integrate it's services -- in essence at least Google is stating in readable wording that they are going to screw you. None of the 'tech world' corporations do the same. So keep harping against Google but out of all the 'tech world' biggies, its hardly the worst violator out there. If you don't like Google than at least man up enough to say you're just jumping on the Rupert Murdoch bandwagon, but making up dumb ass statements is pointless is diverting from the real issues. A world were just one corporation has so much personal data on the population is a real issue.

    5. Re:Google and Android by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh please, if you aren't happy with Google now you are an astroturfer? Fanboy much?

      Lets see...they made the TOS nastier, so they could monetize the hell out of you, have gotten so bad at bugging the piss out of YouTube users to use G+ that I've had to install a browser just for YouTube so Google couldn't bug the piss out of me, and the amount of tying everything to your user account has gotten so creepy and stalkerish that i made a throw away Gmail for my Android so it would stop trying to dump G+ from my main Gmail onto my phone.

      Yep no reason to be upset or unhappy with Google right now, they are doubleplus good citizen!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Google and Android by binarylarry · · Score: 2

      So you hate Google+ and because of that, Google is the biggest hypocrite in the tech world ever?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    7. Re:Google and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      | sed s/A world were/A world where/

      A world where just one corporation has so much personal data on the population is a real issue.

      Uh, yeah. We'd better make sure there's a backup corporation to hold information on everyone in case Google disappears...

    8. Re:Google and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CyanogenMod includes Google Analytics. So you're not free from Google with CyanogenMod.

      http://www.xda-developers.com/android/remove-the-google-from-cyanogenmod-with-freecygn/

    9. Re:Google and Android by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      There's also the fact that Android is starting to look like one massive bait-and-switch. Google has spent a few years now slowly killing their support for open-source components and replacing them with proprietary ones. Personally, I don't really mind yet, and you can always go with Cyanogenmod or something based on true AOSP, but I can certainly understand someone wanting to avoid Android entirely because of it.

      See: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/ar...

    10. Re:Google and Android by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I'm looking to exit Android because it's only a matter of time before you have to have a G+ account to use it.

      I'm also looking to exit Voice for the same reason. Anyone know any good alternatives?

    11. Re:Google and Android by Fuzzums · · Score: 2

      For one because you would expect something that can be customised and configured, but instead droid devices uses an all-or-nothing security model and come with tons of pre-installed uninstallable sh..tuff.
      And g+

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    12. Re:Google and Android by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The change in the TOS was nearly a year before G+ was rolled out and has others below you have pointed out they are making android into another proprietary OS and by ramming G+ down your throat with damned near every service the profile they can build on you is Stasi levels of scary. If you use Gmail and YouTube and give up and log in to YouTube they know what kind of shows you like, what kind of music you listen to, YouTube was very separate from Gmail and Google for precisely that reason and Google USED to talk about how well they protect their users while using that as an example.

      So anybody who claims someone who no longer trusts Google is an Astroturfer? Sorry but they need to stop sucking Gdick and look at what the company has been doing the last couple of years. If I said a company knows where you are, when you are home, what music and shows you like, who your friends are, where they live, that sounds like something out of 1984, right? That is simply what a Google services user with an Android phone has already divulged without even knowing it.

      There are several articles out there showing how much intel Google has on their users, wouldn't want to be called an astroturfer though so I'm sure you can look it up, might want to use Duck DuckGo to do that search, just FYI.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Google and Android by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      But I like sucking Gdick :(

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  4. Neo900.org by Zarhan · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a niche project, but looks like getting a good techie phone is niche these days. Uses N900 displays and casing, so resolution is not getting any better, but has lots more processing power.

    Jolla might be an option once they get the QWERTY "other half" available.

    1. Re:Neo900.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm intrigued by the Neo900, it would be nice to switch to something that is simply an improvement without worry about compromise and sacrifices.

      I bought a Jolla and it has it's ups and downs. The interface is slick and smooth. The android app support works reasonably well (it's definitely not perfect, but has been good enough for most things I've tried). The sailfish sdk is a lot nicer than the old maemo sdk. The other half idea still seems like it will be nice once things start coming out (or I make some myself). The terminal application is actually fairly nice, though the on screen keyboard is still not as nice as a hardware keyboard.

      On the downside, it lacks the 1700MHz band that the n900 had, which makes it worse to use in the US. I think there are some other bands that US carriers have for LTE that the jolla doesn't have but neither did the n900. I read somewhere that the FM (yes, I used to use both transmit and recieve on my n900, occassionally) antenna pins aren't actually wired up, so even if someone activates that functionality in the bt chip, it wouldn't really work. LTE support hasn't actually been implemented in the software yet. The settings seem sparse and missing some options that would be nice. Of course the lack of a hardware keyboard is annoying, as is the lack of IR support (I used it all the time on my n900). Jolla still hasn't publicly released CAD files to make it easy for people to design and print their own other halves. And I feel a general sense of the device not being complete (worse than the n900 when it came out) and that the developers are still almost as closed off and unresponsive as the maemo and meego team at Nokia. I was hoping for a little more openess once they actually released a phone.

      Overall, I think I'd lean slightly toward the Neo900 for the short term (particularly for US users), but I still have hope that the Jolla will actually develop into something even nicer, eventually, maybe.

    2. Re:Neo900.org by Threni · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > It's a niche project, but looks like getting a good techie phone is niche these days.

      Define "techie phone". What's wrong with, say, a Nexus 5/Galaxy S3/4, for instance? What functionality do you believe is missing?

      And if you don't like Google, put Cyanogenmod (or any other AOSP based project) and forgo the Google Apps.

    3. Re:Neo900.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Modem with DMA access to the RAM makes those devices unacceptable.

    4. Re:Neo900.org by TuxThePenguin2205 · · Score: 1

      expanding ... "Direct Memory Access access to the Random Access Memory." I know I'm a pedant but I enjoyed that!

    5. Re:Neo900.org by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

      They intend to increase Sailfish market share by making the OS easily available for Android phones. I'd guess if you flash it to an Android device with support for 1700MHz, it should work. Actually I'm waiting for a list of cheap Android devices capable of running Sailfish.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
  5. Need that keyboard. by Sowelu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh god yes please. Sometimes I have to do some amount of scripting on my phone, and a hardware keyboard is a complete necessity. On the Android side, I've gone from a Samsung Epic to a Motorola Photon, but I can't find a good next upgrade path. At this point I don't care about Android or iPhone or anything as long as I can get a slide-out keyboard with brackets on the keys.

    1. Re:Need that keyboard. by Dracos · · Score: 1

      I'm still on the Epic, because the Photon Q's non-removable battery made it a non-option.

    2. Re:Need that keyboard. by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      It's no hardware keyboard, but the Hacker's Keyboard is quite useful for scripting/cli purposes. Unfortunately it only works well in landscape mode, which ends up severely restricting your vertical space, and some apps insist on using the stupid "full screen text box" input method in landscape orientation which is completely useless, but by and large it works as well as one can expect for an on screen keyboard.

      If you've got a big, high res screen (Nexus 5, S4, etc) it's actually a pretty decent solution, especially considering that hardware keyboard phones are all but dead and gone nowadays.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    3. Re:Need that keyboard. by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 2

      Bluetooth keyboard? Almost all platforms support it.

      Also, I have this vague terror about any sort of important scripting being done from a device with a sub-5" screen. No offense, but I kind of hope that I don't rely on those services ...

    4. Re:Need that keyboard. by Brama · · Score: 1

      I find that MessagEase is an excellent keyboard for scripting. In fact, I like it better than a hardware keyboard. All the letters, numbers and other printable characters you need are available with a single swipe. Nowadays, after special request, it also includes Ctrl, Alt and F1..F12. Vim works wonderfully well once you master the non-standard layout.

      The only major drawback is that it eats screen real estate. I'd recommend a Galaxy Note with a nice big screen for that, although I get by well enough on a HTC One with a 4.7" screen. With the onscreen keyboard, you have more than enough space for a 80x25 terminal in ConnectBot.

    5. Re:Need that keyboard. by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

      About a year ago I purchased a Photon Q for much the same reasons as the person who posted the original comment. I was extremely weary of the non-removable battery. A year later and it is still the most solid phone I have ever had. Also, the keyboard is a full five rows and one of, if not the best keyboard I have ever used on a phone.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    6. Re:Need that keyboard. by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      I upgraded from the Epic after I had two of them break in a three year period. The MicroUSB port is *really* badly attached to the mainboard. If you use the phone much while it's plugged in and put any strain on that port at all, you may find that the port starts working pretty inconsistently (needs to be plugged in at the correct angle), and even starts shorting a little bit (first noticeable by an erratic touchscreen).

      Aside from that one single flaw, the Epic was a truly great machine. If I can't upgrade to another good phone from the Photon, I may well downgrade to an Epic again.

    7. Re:Need that keyboard. by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      One problem I've had with the Photon is that Chrome doesn't agree with its keyboard very well. Unlike my Epic, it seems to think that the Photon's is more like a PC keyboard--you must hold shift to capitalize instead of toggling it, and the "Symbol" button doesn't work. Everything else is fine, it's just that Chrome is hosed. It's still usable because you can close the keyboard and use the screen one, but still.

      Did you manage to find a way around that?

    8. Re:Need that keyboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think some Blackberry phones still have hardware keyboards. I'm not sure what they run, I didn't pay much attention when I heard it.

  6. Blackberry by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

    Obviously. Check out market-ticker.org, where among other political/economic rantings, the author frequently delves into in-depth discussions on Blackberry and it's technical characteristics.

    You might even learn a thing or two about the real reasons health care is so expensive in the US (if you are in the US and care about that.)

    1. Re:Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha blackberry. You know, the company whose idiotic head in the sand approach led to them going out of business?

      Oh, the name will stay around, but everything else is outsourced now. Thankfully, because I doubt any other company has the talent required to fuck up as royally as RIM did.

    2. Re:Blackberry by davester666 · · Score: 2

      you think the name will stick? I don't. They crapped over the RIM brand, and had to drop it for BB, and BB now is getting all crapped over as obsolete and slow and cheap. Nortel, which was a much bigger company totally disappeared in a flash, and they had a pretty good reputation.

      BB just seems to be hanging on kind of pointlessly. They are selling their building to get some more quick cash, and seem to be burning through it at a good pace. I suppose they could limp along for a while longer selling cheap phones to asia/africa, but that's just revenue, it won't make them any money or get them any bigger.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Blackberry by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      in 10 years we will see the BlackBerry brand on very low end china TV sets just like GE and Phillips.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think the name will stick? I don't. They crapped over the RIM brand, and had to drop it for BB, and BB now is getting all crapped over as obsolete and slow and cheap. Nortel, which was a much bigger company totally disappeared in a flash, and they had a pretty good reputation.

      BB just seems to be hanging on kind of pointlessly. They are selling their building to get some more quick cash, and seem to be burning through it at a good pace. I suppose they could limp along for a while longer selling cheap phones to asia/africa, but that's just revenue, it won't make them any money or get them any bigger.

      cheap? Really? Take a chill pill. BB cost about the same as all the other crap out there. I personally hate those idiot slabs, I have to finger fuck and caress to get something done. I like buttons. An I do not give a flying fuck what's on youtube, FB or on some moronic photo sharing site. consume... consume.. consume more shit and advertising... How retarded is that?

    5. Re:Blackberry by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Well, the phones they have available to north america are the expensive ones. they are also the ones that aren't selling. they are selling more of their older, cheaper models [years old] in asia/middle east, and that is where they seem to be hoping to stay alive with. but there, they are competing with firms that pay the same [or less] for the hardware parts, and pay zero for the OS [android], so there isn't a lot of room to pay for ongoing development of their own OS.

      and I don't see them making ANY money from BBMessages, even if it's "secure" [sure some companies/gov't will buy it, but not to the general population of smartphone users] because there are a zillion mostly secure messaging services that they can use for free. and getting it built into iOS or Android...can't see Apple or Google really wanting it built it...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  7. If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by pijokela · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I got one from preordering and I really like it a lot. If the thing you like in n900 is the community and the hackability, you will like Jolla too. Most importantly, I'm able to use it as my work phone already, so it's not just a plaything. So far there has been a steady stream of updates and apps. If you are in US, getting one is probably not very easy, but maybe you can get one from ebay or something? (Check the frequencies etc. first.)

    http://jolla.com/

    1. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      this phone has 2012 specs, so €399.99 is overpriced.

      You can get buy a Nexus 5 for $350.00 US/CAN (Google Play store)

    2. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by pijokela · · Score: 4, Informative

      So? The Nexus 5 has nothing to do with what made n900 great. Jolla has a pretty similar OS, community and development environment. Neither phone has a hardware keyboard. Either you are willing to pay for the better OS or you are not... I agree that Android hardware is the most cost effective hardware on the planet.

      (Part of the Jolla price is 24% sales tax to Finland - it would be nice if they had a separate export price for people outside EU without the tax. Hopefully soon.)

    3. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been very happy with my Jolla and its ability to run Android apps so well has meant that where there are gaps in the fledgling Sailfish apps ecosystem, it hasn't been a problem.

      If a hardware keyboard is a must have, then it is possible to buy a handmade keyboard by a community member for 100 euros: http://www.jollausers.com/2014/01/self-made-qwerty-otherhalf-is-being-worked-on-new-edition-of-oled-otherhalf/

    4. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by levell · · Score: 1

      The Jolla keyboard mentioned by the parent is only being made in a batch of 100 to start with so may not be an option for everyone...

      --
      Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
    5. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be specific. The main part of the engineering and designer team that made Maemo on n900 moved on to make N9 and n950 (unpublished successor to the n900), and after Elop closed the development moved on to make the company called jolla.

      Their OS is evolution of the line which started with the Maemo tablets, culminating in n900 and N9/n950. The phone is in beta phase through you can buy one. One of their specialities is the special separate back panel system, which apparently has a digital connection to the main phone, allowing you to replace the standard back cover for one with keyboard eventually when one is developed.

      Overall, if you're looking for n900 successor today, jolla is about the only thing that comes to mind.

    6. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by dwater · · Score: 1

      > n950 (unpublished successor to the n900),

      Hrm, imo, not really...only in that it had a keyboard. Otherwise, it was very different. I would call it an unpublished N9-with-keyboard-and-no-NFC. I forget if there were any other differences - oh, it was quite straightforward to replace the battery on the n950, unlike the n9.

      --
      Max.
    7. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      As noted, the phone is in beta and does have a mechanism for adding a keyboard. As far as I know the backpanel with keyboard is just not developed yet.

    8. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by dwater · · Score: 1

      > the phone is in beta

      i was referring to the claim that the n950 was the successor to the n900. I suppose it was if you take 'successor' to mean simply 'the one after', but it was really much more of an n9-with-keyboard-and-no-nfc, than anything much to do with the n900.

      --
      Max.
    9. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      n950 was cancelled from full production to developer platform. As a result, it had several features stripped from it.

      Nontheless, n950 was in fact designed as a successor to the n900. I know people who were on the engineering team.

    10. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by vedranius · · Score: 0

      To be specific. The main part of the engineering and designer team that made Maemo on n900 moved on to make N9 and n950 (unpublished successor to the n900), and after Elop closed the development moved on to make the company called jolla.

      That's not really truth. The designer teams just dissolved, people taking own routes. E.g. graphics team - guys working on drivers, touch screen, etc mostly ended up in Intel.

    11. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by dwater · · Score: 2

      *I* was on the engineering team and I have an n900, n950 and n9 somewhere around here - my wife still uses the n9. It was only a successor in that it came after the n900 - it shared nothing much else with the n900, apart from perhaps the base linux was similar, but the middleware and UI were totally different.

      Like I say, if you meant to say that it just came after the n900, then that is correct. I took you to mean something more than that.

      --
      Max.
    12. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what "successor" means? I guess it was a bit ambiguous.

    13. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by gcobb · · Score: 1

      I still use my N900 as my everyday phone. But it clearly can't last forever. I have bought a Jolla to replace it. It is definitely a work-in-progress, really only just usable (because of not-yet-implemented features, not poor UX) but the definite successor to the N900. It has a good team working on it, with updates adding new features all the time, and is building a community.

      If you want to support a non-Apple, non-Android alternative and prefer as much openness as you can get, I recommend getting a Jolla.

    14. Re:If you can live without keyboard, get a Jolla by dwater · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, in a way...that's why I conceded the point. However, the n950 was not the *direct* successor - there were at least a couple in between the n950 and n900 - one n950 look-alike (I preferred it to the n950) was even labelled 'n9'. It wasn't the same OS or even the same people who developed it (it was done in parallel somewhat) - though the maemo5 guys did join in the Maemo6/MeeGo development later on, once maemo5 was 'done'. Perhaps some of the lower-level guys moved earlier, I'm not sure, and some team leaders/architects too, I suppose.

      Of course, there were also several other Nokia phones actually released between the n900 and n950, some of them looking suspiciously like the totally unreleased models we were using for development (the N8, for example).

      So, perhaps you can understand my reluctance to accept that the n950 was *the* unreleased successor. It wasn't *the* successor because it wasn't released, and it wasn't the 'unreleased successor' because there were others in between that were also unreleased (and some that were but were symbian). The n950 was in a 'grey area' though, since it was 'given away' to non-Nokia developers....so it is just 'not that simple' :)

      --
      Max.
  8. N9005 here by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    Samsung's joke on Nokia :) Reasonably happy, but not 'in control' as with Maemo. And no HW keyboard of course.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:N9005 here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I couldn't resist. Still use my n900 for a couple of non-call related things.
      Stepped into Galaxy note a few years ago. Jolla seemed to be a promising alternative, but was to late for me and silence about other halfs, especially a HW kyeboard, made me look at the Note series again. And then, who can resist another N900(5)...

  9. Neo900 by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a Neo900 project attempting to make a modernized version of the N900, software and hardware. I don't know if they'll succeed and be able to do it at a price one can afford, but you might check it out if interested. If you don't visit maemo.org forums you might wish to.

    I like my N9, but not the way I loved my N900. I especially miss the h/w keyboard.

    There's also the Jolla phone, but its availability and network compatibility is limited now (e.g. current version might work in the US but as 2G only, the only modem offered in it is designed for European market, or part thereof, no idea what rest of the world situation would be like). And again, no h/w keyboard.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Neo900 by reportbase · · Score: 1

      Your no crackpot. N900 very well could have been a great phone. It just needed one or two more generations. Sad that it got abandoned. In fact, i'm more sad about n900 got abandoned, than any other of my devices that I've purchased over the years.

  10. Say "Thank You" to the man who destroyed Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Once upon time there was a company, struggling but still profitable. Then one day M$ Sauron came.
    Destroyed and sunk the company, flying off using golden parachute.
    Fascist western regimes reward incompetence.
    Another chapter closed.

    1. Re:Say "Thank You" to the man who destroyed Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Nokia had destroyed themselves long before Microsoft turned up - largely thanks to things like the N900 which no one other then a very small number of geeks were interested in.

    2. Re:Say "Thank You" to the man who destroyed Nokia by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's follow-up, N9 sold millions without ANY marketing whatsoever - Elop specifically forbid any kind of marketing for it, suggesting that you are utterly incorrect in your rather strange assumption.

    3. Re:Say "Thank You" to the man who destroyed Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burma Shave.

    4. Re:Say "Thank You" to the man who destroyed Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are soooo wrong. Microsoft shafted Nokia in the way that only an unscrupulous monopolist could. Destroyed their market share, destroyed a viable non-US third mobile OS, crippled a phone manufacturer to the point that they could be picked up for a song. The true idiots in this sad and sorry story were the short-sighted fools who allowed Elop to become Nokia CEO. A very sad story.

    5. Re:Say "Thank You" to the man who destroyed Nokia by dwater · · Score: 1

      > allowed

      Really? The board are the ones to blame, but not because the 'allowed' anything, but because they installed incentives to do exactly what he did do. I'm tempted to think they wanted to get out of mobile phones altogether. I totally don't blame Elop - he did an excelent job - I blame those who asked him to do what he did.

      --
      Max.
    6. Re:Say "Thank You" to the man who destroyed Nokia by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      My old N900 (run over by a car) was a WAY better hacking device but definitely fell short in the "phone" department. It always felt like a hacking device with a phone barely bolted on. I definitely miss it, but my new N9 is an infinitely better "phone" with 90% of the hacking stuff still in place. I actually prefer my N9's interface to anything Apple or Android have put out. The whole "there are only 3 screens and they all have a single purpose" design with the combined notification feed is absolutely amazingly simple and easy to use.

  11. Replacement? by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have any other techies found a replacement for their N900?"

    A sledgehammer, but it really is a poor substitute. They aren't as strong as the N900 was. As I understand it, the replacement program for the Space Shuttle suffered a major setback after they were discontinued; they're having to rely on conventional heat shielding now to re-enter the atmosphere.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  12. Cyanogen, Ubuntu, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get a phone with decent specs which works well with an alternative OS like Cyanogen. Yes, it's still Google-created to some extent, but it's also sort of giving Google the middle finger in some ways.

  13. Android is OK-able by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hats off to you, sir, for holding out longer than I could with my Palm T|X.

    Currently I'm rather happy with CyanogenMOD on my HTC myTouch Slide 4G (and the slide 3G before that). Too bad they haven't updated the myTouch Slide line for a while, since they'd carve out a nice little niche for themselves being one of the only major Android manufacturers that did physical keyboards.

    I'm about to break down and just get a Nexus something, and pair it with an external portable keyboard (there are various cases that help make this more portable).

    Also, I think you'd enjoy running full ARM linux on an Android device, but look at the forums for
    https://play.google.com/store/...
    and check which ROMs support the loopback module (or make sure you can build one for yourself). Not all of my third-party ROMs bothered to do this, so I only have a full chroot Debian distro behind one or two of my Android devices :/

    But let us know how you turn out! My musings were plopped down here:
    http://trumblings.blogspot.com...
    and maybe a few more relevant posts here:
    http://trumblings.blogspot.com...

    1. Re:Android is OK-able by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I also would put a vote in for the MyTouch 4G Slide. Not as good as the n900 but it has been a decent replacement
      and being mainstream it does have the advantage of having things like wifi hotspot, vendor support, and plenty of apps.
      Make sure it is the HTC version and not the recent replacement which isn't near as good.
      If you are trying to avoid android another option is to get a bluetooth keyboard case for an iphone. The case basically
      attachs a physical keyboard to the iphone.

    2. Re:Android is OK-able by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm about to break down and just get a Nexus something, and pair it with an external portable keyboard (there are various cases that help make this more portable).

      So what are the options for keyboard cases? I've looked and have only seen ones for the iPhone. If there is something that would work well with my Nexus 5 that would be great.

  14. I'd have to agree...N900 is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was like you back when the N900 first came out. I thought it was great! Total customization, full Linux Kernel, CLI, etc. Trust me dude, once you switch to a modern platform, the N900 won't even be a distant memory. It's a horrible device in reality. It was a hobby-shop idea by Nokia that went nowhere. It had some plusses, but they were far outweighed by it's minuses. Dump it. Get a Nexus 4 or 5 and flash it with an open ROM if you're dead set against Google.

    1. Re:I'd have to agree...N900 is crap by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Get a Nexus 4 or 5 and flash it with an open ROM if you're dead set against Google.

      ROM? ROM? What is a "ROM".

      That's why people who understand the N900 can't move to Android - Android is not Linux.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  15. re: Life after N900? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. Life after Treo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude, how do you think I feel, I still have my Treo 755p, the homo erectus of smart phones. The email stopped working a couple of years ago but I can still browse many websites, text and make calls.

    1. Re:Life after Treo? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I had a Treo 650 before I upgraded to an N900...see if you can find one used, you're really missing out.

      The 755p wasn't really the homo erectus of smartphones, that would be the Treo 180 (had one before the 650) or VisorPhone.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Life after Treo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first smartphone was a Handspring Visor with the Sprint version of the VisorPhone. I bought two (for $25 each) when Sprint was giving up on them. I used one until the radio died, and the second for a couple years after that.

      My second smartphone was a Treo 680. I have replaced screens and batteries, as well as buying two more phones as backups.

      I am still using my Treo 680.

    3. Re:Life after Treo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it's more like Homo Ergaster or something. I had a Treo 650 and a 600 too. Good phones.

  17. Re:I had a N900 too... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It was shit. I didn't really realise quite how shit it was until I upgraded to an iPhone. Never looked back since.

    It's not a phone for the general population. The N900 was a phone for hackers, developers, etc.: people who needed a pocket computer with phone functionality. Sort of the "anti-iPhone" in its philosophy. You were clearly not in the (tiny) target demographic, and whoever sold you yours was not your friend, didn't know you very well, or didn't as the right questions. (I just described a salesman, didn't I?)

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  18. Who was your Highest Bidder? by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe because he doesn't like the idea of his private life being a product that is sold to the highest bidder? Just a guess.

    Ironically a quick glance through your private posts, shows your continued subterfuge about Google *selling* your data. Google business model is to *NEVER* sell your data. Advertising is the product. If they sold your data they wouldn't have a product.

    Almost everyone here understands the model, yet you persist in this transparent lie. Interestingly search Microsoft's and Apple EULA using the search for what they do with trusted *cough* third partys.

    1. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by pitchpipe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google business model is to *NEVER* sell your data.

      Really?! One of my rules is to never say 'never', because it's a really long time. I also thought my government would 'never' spy on me. I thought all of those conspiracy theorists were crazy.

      Mark my words, one day your private life will be sold by Google, and I'm pretty sure it'll go to the highest bidder.

      Ironically a quick glance through your private posts, shows your continued subterfuge about Google *selling* your data.

      Also, two can play that game. 'Subterfuge' doesn't mean what you think it means.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    2. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 5, Informative

      From Google's Privacy Policy Page

      With your consent

      We will share personal information with companies, organizations or individuals outside of Google when we have your consent to do so. We require opt-in consent for the sharing of any sensitive personal information..

      So Google does "share" data with advertisers as part of their money stream. A very specific subset is opt-in, but everything else is opt-out. If services get updated and you're not careful, you can miss an opt-out. See Privacy and Copyright Protection

      I'm not sure how anyone can read that and not understand that they're selling your data. They're just calling it sharing. Everything in the EULA you already agreed to in order for you to use a Google service grants them the permission they need.

    3. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry, in this case I trust Microsoft waaaay before I trust Google. Microsoft seems interested in advertising, but I don't see them forcing me onto their social media sites, linking my bing accounts, or bothering me for my phone number (except on Xbox now, ugh).

    4. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google will not sell your "life" as that is not their business model.

      LexisNexis does that. I can cheaply buy enough info about you to really scare the shit out of you. And they have far FAR more info on you than Google would ever dream of having.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Selling implies Google hands over the data. They don't. They provide APIs for 3rd parties to access statistics which may describe you and then submit advertising which Google will then present to the user.

      If they handed over their data they'd gut their income stream. It's a company who's income is based solely on the fact that they know everything about everyone. They don't hand this info over, they facilitate other people using the info they have.

    6. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also thought my government would 'never' spy on me. I thought all of those conspiracy theorists were crazy.

      then you are even dumber than your other posts sound.

    7. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      How do you think Google's ad service works? That is the question, and the answer reveals how stupid selling the data would be.

      Google's service is simple:
      1) Submit an ad to Google (banner / flash / etc)
      2) Look at the list of demographics, do you want male or female, what age, what interests?
      3) Press submit

      Google will store the ad on their server, when a user who matches the chosen profile loads a page with Google ads embedded in it, Google will insert the ad into the page where it downloads from their servers.

      Notice specifically that this places Google as the middleman between you and the advertiser, the advertiser chooses what they want from the restaurant menu, Google cooks it then delivers the finished meal (people who clicked on ads) and a bill.

      If Google sold the information, Google would have no business, the advertiser could sell ads directly without Google's help.

    8. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Im pretty sure they cant change the terms of your arrangement without you agreeing to the updated terms.

    9. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your rule is to never say never? How biebalistic of you.

    10. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by WizardFusion · · Score: 1

      Learn to spell

    11. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google business model is to *NEVER* sell your data.

      Because Google's business model is to BUY your data from other providers and line that up with your web activity. It still takes two to tango.

    12. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Google plans to do or what you think it plans to do is not important.
      It's about what they are capable of.

    13. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is sooooooooo true. Only the other day, I logged in to AdWords, and there at the top of the screen was a big box that said "Find out the life history of anyone on the Internet by entering their email address, reddit, or Slashdot ID in this box".

      So I looked for a random number. There was a flyer for a local car dealership advertising a Corolla for $9,751.38, so I entered that, and clicked Submit. There was a brief request asking me to give my consent to a charge of 25c on my Google Wallet, and I thought "What the hell, why not?" and gave it.

      There, in front of me, was all the information about "975138" I asked for. It was one of those "Be careful what you wish for, you might get it" things. Slashdot had pulled up the details of some Slashdotter with the nick "Jaktar".

      Everything was there.

      His phone numbers. His credit record. I could see he'd spent over $300 in the last month on "Gold pony cookies" for the popular free-to-play Facebook game "Pony club". He had a recurring membership on several websites, including the Alabama Post Gazette, Netflix, and something called "Hot Manponies Dot Com".

      Even better was that all of this was hyperlinked to similarly relevant information. I clicked on a credit card billing line marked "KATZ PSYCHIATRIC SERV COPAY", and immediately received a list of future and prior appointments with a therapist. The prior appointments were also hyperlinked, and a quick click revealed a Google Voice style transcription of the appointment in question (not that interesting, 20 minutes of it was marked "(extended sobbing, 2 mins)" alternating with "(hysterical laughing, 60 seconds)".

      Finally, there was information to help people like me, who just want to advertise and tailor our ads to people like "Jaktar". Google had analyzed the person's history, and recommended various keywords I could use in my ads to appeal to people like him. "Star Wars", "Leia", "PHP", "Free to play", and "Ponies" came up.

      This type of information is gold, quite frankly. Advertisers like me are always interested in targetting specific people at great expense, rather than trying to appeal to broad swathes of the population, so Google collecting this data and selling it to us is exactly what we need.

      Thanks Google!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    14. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because he doesn't like the idea of his private life being a product that is sold to the highest bidder? Just a guess.

      Ironically a quick glance through your private posts, shows your continued subterfuge about Google *selling* your data. Google business model is to *NEVER* sell your data. Advertising is the product. If they sold your data they wouldn't have a product.

      Almost everyone here understands the model, yet you persist in this transparent lie. Interestingly search Microsoft's and Apple EULA using the search for what they do with trusted *cough* third partys.

      The so-called "lie" persists because there aren't enough of you ignorant folks to tell him he's wrong. Google absolutely sells lists of numbers reflecting real data to advertisers to aid them in designing advertisements.

      Calling it "your" data to side-step that they aggregate it first is disingenuous, but less so than your post here.

    15. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by almitydave · · Score: 1

      Learn to punctuate!

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    16. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Go back to my post and click the link to privacy policy.

      Read the sections on "information we collect" then read the section on "information we share".

      Those two sections are not mutually exclusive. The information collected is the same as the information they share. You already gave them permission to do so.

      I'm not disputing the fact that they also setup API's to allow easier targeting for ads, that's also part of their business model. It's just not their ONLY business.

    17. Re:Who was your Highest Bidder? by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Very entertaining.

  19. os is best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >I'd like to avoid supporting Google/Android

    >handset that offers everything for the power user

    There's your problem, submitter.

  20. To get a keyboard by mhkohne · · Score: 1

    is itself a major problem these days. I'm using a Droid 4 because it's one of the few with any kind of keyboard available. You may or may not like Android, but you can always put CyanogenMod on it, if you want to move further away from the carrier's grasping tentacles.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
    1. Re:To get a keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm also doing this, but the Droid 4 has horrible latency, like multiple seconds of lag just navigating around the settings app. I think there's something actually wrong with the way the software's built because Nexus 4 and 5 have ten times less latency and certainly don't have ten times faster hardware.

      Another problem is battery life: Droid 4 cannot last the day, and in certain poor radio conditions Droid 4 will flatten its battery in an hour. For newer phones, I believe modern LTE radios may be more efficient. For older phones like Droid 3, extended Chinese batteries were cheap on ebay. Droid 4 is in the worst spot on this timeline.

      Finally, there are just buggyness problems. You aren't giving Android a fair shake unless you try a Nexus device where they actually put some diligence into fixing bugs after the product is released, albeit still not enough compared to, well, any other phone (BB, iOS, dumbphone). problems like: crappy GPS, crappy battery life, radios that don't acquire a signal for multiple minutes after emerging from underground, screensavers that get stuck off, crashes/freezes requiring a reboot (sometimes due to fsck-able errors on the filesystem, other times due to some kind of real bug), bluetooth features (ex tethering) that just don't fucking work. Nexus phones still have all this android flake-factor, but less than other phones IMVHO. The Verizon Galaxy Nexus was awful, but the LG Nexuses seem less buggy than other Androids.

      I'd like advice on a bluetooth keyboard case so I could choose from more phones, perhaps Nexus or perhaps iOS.

      However, Android itself might not be to the taste of some. Running Cyanogenmod doesn't help much, except maybe avoid bogus tethering restrictions. You still have yucky Android style (if you are someone who doesn't like it), and you have the usual Android buggyness and then some.

  21. HTC Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been using my 2010 htc incredible, it has no scratches, all hardware still functions, no problems running the latest app. I haven't rooted mine, you can root it easily and eliminate the bloat and prolong the battery even further though.

    Touchscreen and display are still fine, i started turning the display down recently to resist screen fatigue. It has an optical joystick/button on the bottom, you can move your thumb over it to simulate moving the cursor/using arrow keys and the button acts as a touch, I really enjoy this feature but it has been eliminated from current phones.

    I use it mainly for writing notes in google docs, accessing google drive, email, instant messaging, web browsing ... I can see myself using the same phone for at least 2 more years.

  22. life after N900 is another N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    buy another one

    1. Re:life after N900 is another N900 by thogard · · Score: 2

      Consider buying a new battery. Most laptop and cell phone batteries last between 200 and 400 charge cycles before their life gets too short.

    2. Re:life after N900 is another N900 by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I noticed my battery was holding less charge after about 3 years and got a replacement. They're cheap and easy to find since Nokia shared battery models between many phones. An N900 uses a BL-5J.

      Having a second battery also gives you a quick and easy way out of the "dead battery + won't boot so can't charge" problem on an N900.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:life after N900 is another N900 by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      I have 2 working N900's (and one with "no telephony functions").

      (And one N9 that i tried for a while then gave to my daughter, who loves it. And one Jolla which arrived today. And one pre-order for a Neo900. Am I mad? Probably).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  23. the androidness of it all by xeno · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Congratulations, you made it far longer than I did. My N900 started to show hardware problems about a year ago, and radio problems/disconnects were the last straw. I loved the versatility and control, but ultimately I needed the damn thing to make calls and browse. I nabbed a Nexus 4 when they got cheap, and have adjusted reasonably well. I had a fair look at the iDevices, but wanted something faster and with a bigger screen. I coveted the Galaxy Note series, and might have been happier that way, but I wanted something closer to the N900 size. Recently got my kid a Moto G -- and currently it seems to be the best deal reminiscent of the size/screen of the N900. But still there is the lack of a hardware keyboard... there's just no substitute for input-intensive apps. Maybe Jolla will solve that.

    If you do head in the direction of Android, these might make it easier:
    - Have a look at Cyanogenmod, and see if you can find a sweet spot with hardware you like and a recent version.
    - Read up on App Ops, the utility that allows one to have granular permissions for applications, and restore a modicum of privacy control.
    - Don't be afraid to disable all the default apps/Google+/hangouts/crap. Android works just fine with the processes disabled.
    - Have a look at bare android/Samsung's overlays/cyanogenmod before you commit to them, there are significant differences.
    - Try getting an older phone and experimenting with it before you jump. I obtained a Galaxy S1/Vibrant, learned all about the boot loaders, firmware, and OS installation, and tried out various roms before settling back on Cyanogenmod. (Then I taught the kids how to do it, and gave the phone to my 10yo -- never too early for mobile hacking.) All of the features aside, the process restored some of the sense of control that I had with the N900. Some of it real, some of it not, but at least I knew were I stood wrt the device I was using most frequently.

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
    1. Re:the androidness of it all by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      I didn't have an N900, but I know them. My primary concern was always a hardware keyboard. I've moved through my share of hardware keyboard phones, mostly the very solid line of HTC WinMo phones(Kaiser, Mogul, etc). The closest thing I could find nowadays that at least gives me something close to a hardware keyboard while being an actually solid phone is the Galaxy Note series. The Note 2 is cheap now that the Note 3 is out and is still a very solid device. It's Android, which OP doesn't want, but oh well, it does the job.

    2. Re:the androidness of it all by alphatool · · Score: 1

      I followed a similar path to you when my n900 died, but one thing that I've never managed to get android to do well is multitasking. I loved that on my n900 I could leave any application actually running in the background for as long as I wanted, but on Android it will be tombstoned after a while if I'm using a different app. For example, I haven't found a way to keep Firefox from reloading all of it's tabs after a long pone call. Have any of your mods to Android made a difference with this?

    3. Re:the androidness of it all by radoni · · Score: 2

      Settled on a Huawei U8686 (T-Mobile Prism II / Android 4.1.1) for $70usd new. What I've learned compared to the N900, follows.

      Similar:
      - survive with screen protector a drop to concrete from pocket
      - small hi-res screen is unnoticeable size in pocket
      - replaceable battery
      - wifi / bluetooth / GPS
      - microSD storage expansion
      - standard SIM card

      N900 is better:
      - Camera autofocus and flash with excellent optics quality (affects usefulness as 2D barcode scanner)
      - Keyboard and Resistive touchscreen work always even in rainy weather
      - Cellular carrier sees N900 as a "dumb phone" and no problem to use on cheap unlimited data plan ; Carrier forces upsell to new data plan if using Android OS
      - Already have one and don't want to buy another device
      - Most apps are free as in freedom with open source code and free software license
      - 16GB or 32GB storage internal comparable with most high-end phones to date

      U8686 is better:
      - Make and receive calls consistently with instant and foolproof UI response
      - Integration with T-Mobile wifi hotspot call routing ; use this one a lot at home where there is Internet but no cellular coverage
      - Pinch/pull to zoom makes Firefox Mobile much more useful
      - On screen keyboard works smoothly with easy to configure text prediction
      - Majority OS marketshare at its release with Android
      - No moving parts

      Not sure about:
      - Google Android manager allows to track your misplaced phone ; Admittedly this is both a great benefit and privacy concern
      - Low signal-to-noise App marketplace promoting a non-libre and advertising supported shit storm of apps that are diminishing in usefulness
      - U8686 bootloader is locked by default. Huawei honors requests for bootloader unlock code via a recently-discovered form letter. Alternative Android OS builds for this device by community are not yet available.
      - Where is wireless charging? Aftermarket product makers of either device, hello?

      Summary: An improvement over the N900 should cost *less* than you paid originally for your N900, and to be a true improvement (at the same price) there would be *zero* binary blobs and proprietary softwares required. Can you make a truly libre phone OS run on cheap ($100) Android phone hardware?

      --
      SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
    4. Re:the androidness of it all by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Still running my N900, no problems so far, keeping fingers crossed!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:the androidness of it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Google Android manager allows to track your misplaced phone ; Admittedly this is both a great benefit and privacy concern

      You could always just make a Cron job to upload current GPS coordinates to your server if you want. Not as slick as the iPhone/Android solution, but certainly doable. For bonus points, you could even have the phone poll a particular web page for a signed script and execute it. (Script could do things like play "I am stolen" on the speakers, or change the desktop background to "please return to 123 Fake street."

  24. Love the Q10 by rwade · · Score: 3, Informative

    My Nokia E5 was similarly out of date. Since I use my phone generally for texting, email, twitter I didn't need a big screen but do need a keyboard to be happy. I was not enthused about committing to the BlackBerry platform due to the perceived financial issues, but BBRY has already released a few updates and app support is good enough for me. BlackBerry has taken care of me so far.

    And the keyboard is incredible - not just passable, but enjoyable to type on.

    1. Re:Love the Q10 by umdesch4 · · Score: 3

      I wish I had mod points to mod you up. I love my Q10. I'm an annoyance to my peers. Every time they launch into a rant about some issue they're having with their iPhone, I listen respectfully for however long it takes them to fizzle out, and then I just pull out the Q10, and while starting to check my messages, I just casually say "I think you already know what my solution to that issue is". I gave up trying to sell people on it a long time ago, and I also gave up trying to help people work around their iPhone problems years ago. I use my phone for work and personal stuff, and I work *a lot*, and I commute several hours a day. So I need something that always just works unobtrusively. I dunno what I'm going to do once BlackBerry is gone, and nobody makes a decent phone with a physical keyboard, decent security, decent battery life (with a self replaceable battery), decent stability, non-proprietary connectors, non-proprietary hot-swappable storage media support, decent corporate VPN integration support, seamless Exchange server integration...etc.

    2. Re:Love the Q10 by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      Minus the physical keyboard, you could just get a current Samsung Galaxy Note. I think the included stylus might well serve to replace the missing keyboard.

    3. Re:Love the Q10 by ClaymoreZA · · Score: 1

      Seconded. The Q10 has the best keyboard of any keyboard smartphone. (And I reckon the Z10 and Z30 have the best virtual keyboards).

  25. Q10 or Wiko by core · · Score: 2

    If you're really bent on having a hardware keyboard, the Blackberry Q10 is pretty decent. There's zero apps for it, but I guess you didn't mind if you held on to your N900 for so long.

    Otherwise, get a ridiculously overpowered/underpriced android phone like a Wiko. They got for like $200 without a plan and run a recent Android on very decent hardware. This way you can try it out without sinking too much money into a samsung or htc phone if it turns out you can't stand Android.

    1. Re:Q10 or Wiko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's zero apps for it

      Apart from all the Android ones, you mean?

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    2. Re:Q10 or Wiko by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      A lot of Android apps, even ones that run just fine on the BlackBerry Z10, fail miserably on the Q10.

      I think it's because of the perfectly square screen - the hardware doesn't HAVE a 'portrait' or 'landscape' mode, so the app goes AUGHWTFBBQ and quits.

      The other issue I have is that the hardware keyboard simply doesn't work in a lot of Android apps. Letters will type the wrong character, and using the Sym key to access things like the = is a real crapshoot.

      All of which is extra-irksome because there are some apps which simply don't have a BB10 equivalent, even when there's a BB7 version. An AOL Instant Messenger client, for instance.

      I really like my Q10 overall, but the Android sandbox still needs work.

  26. Jolla Sailfish perhaps by opk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Currently, they seem to be the best option If you want to avoid supporting google. Personally, I'm sticking with my N900. I wouldn't mind something newer but don't see a need to spend a lot of money when my N900 still works fine.

    1. Re:Jolla Sailfish perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another option will be to downgrade to 3120 classic (quad band). it doesn't need to be more complex than that but i would work on second level of animated icons instead. iconology is a hobby of mine anyways.

    2. Re:Jolla Sailfish perhaps by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Jolla is the direct succesor of the N9, which is somewhat of a succesor to the N900. I belive it's the closest choice in terms of software stack and openness. I also wouldn't be surprised if we see a keyboard back-lid for Jolla in future (with all the exchangable lids, and functionality they can have).

    3. Re:Jolla Sailfish perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stuck to my N900 until a Jolla arrived on my desk in December. Simultaneously FirefoxOS became interesting. For me, personally, the Jolla ticks all the boxes. Its a lovely phone to use and others are envious of the clarity of SMS and email. It all works one-handed. I can ssh into it and write bash scripts that work without breaking any agreements or doing any hacking. Qt is as expected but, as a hacker, I rather miss Python being there by default. There aren't yet enough apps of the sort that I want (no native Firefox) and I fear that the Android layer will be an excuse not to produce them. I fear that Jolla will remain as nichey as the N900 but who says true greatness is only achieved by volume?

      FirefoxOS is even more exciting in that I can give it to my 10 year old daughter and she can get everything out of it that she would want and I know that she's safe. The same would apply to my 75 year old mother. If you don't want to actually hack on your phone but just want something that works without the issues surrounding either Android or iOS then this has to be the future. How can it fail? FirefoxOS will achieve volume. I fondle a FFOS phone every day even if I carry the Jolla.

      My ideal will happen when someone produces the keyboard for the Jolla (although the touch screen keyboard is surprisingly good) and when Jolla is able to run FirefoxOS apps. Given some improvements with IM, some extra native apps and the addition of an interpreted language other than shell scripts, the Jolla is as close to the natural successor of the N900 as you could get.

  27. Re:I had a N900 too... by reportbase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    agreed to an extent. it was first gen phone, that needed a couple more generations to get it all right. However, the basic idea of the n900 was awesome, and still exceeds what I see on the market today.

  28. Re:I had a N900 too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm genpop in that perspective and i liked N900 as a phone. It was a great phone.

  29. Samsung i927 Captivate Glide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a second-hand Samsung i927 a few days ago. I'm still waiting for it to arrive in the mail. On paper, it has everything to be a good phone, including a real keyboard. It's comparable to a Galaxy S2 and it is cheap to get these days.

  30. Re:I had a N900 too... by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Informative

    Easy enough. Get any recent phone that's supported by Cyanogenmod. Install Cyanogenmod. Then install Debian (or similar). This can be accomplished as a dual boot or as a chroot inside Android. I have Debian installed on my phone; it's kind of fun to dabble with and show people.

  31. HTC Desire Z with Flinny's CyanogenMod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still ok for me...

  32. Try other mobile Platforms with Nexus 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nexus 4 is N9000 today - you can check Ubuntu Touch or Sailfish OS

  33. Sliders by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    There are a few android phones like motorola droid or the lg enact with slideout keyboards like the one in the N900 (not sure if as comfortable too). They aren't too powerful, nor with a big resolution screen, but probably would be an improvement. With a bit of luck you can install cyanogenmod on them, or even ubuntu touch or others built from android base like firefox os for extra hackability.

    If you want another kind of phone, Blackberry Q10 have a keyboard and a good screen resolution for that format. And there are cases for other phones that provides a keyboard, like this one for the S4.

    You can change a bit the focus of your search too.The N900 wasn't so great as a phone, but was great as a pocket computer, maybe searching for something that fits in that role and having something else as phone (and maybe 3g hotspot) could have better alternatives.

  34. I loved my Amiga, too by msobkow · · Score: 1

    I loved my Amiga, too. That doesn't mean I want to go back to those days.

    Life has moved on. Time for you to do the same.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I loved my Amiga, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well duh, that's exactly what he said. The question is, to what?

    2. Re:I loved my Amiga, too by msobkow · · Score: 1

      But that's just it. He's still in love with his "Amiga". He wants the same thing, but newer. They're no longer made. Such is life.

      No one can tell him what to like. It's just post fodder for the iOS and Android fans to scream at each other again.

      Realistically, if he's so stuck on a keyboard, he's pretty much stuck with the Blackberry devices, and they don't give him the other features he says he wants. So the author is going to have to make some choices.

      Not the public.

      The lazy assed "I don't want to do my own research" author.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    3. Re:I loved my Amiga, too by psmears · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The lazy assed "I don't want to do my own research" author.

      Of course he's going to have to make some choices. But when making such choices, it's helpful to have a feel for how well the devices work in practice, for the intended use: I've had plenty of devices in the past that, according to their specs at least, were perfect - but ended up being frustratingly deficient in some way. Reading online reviews can help with this to some extent, but they tend not to focus on (say) programming as a use case - so I can imagine that input from slashdotters would be very valuable here. (It's also really helpful for pointing out phones/other devices that the author may not have considered, that don't necessarily come up in a typical web search...)

  35. The Company by Jamlad · · Score: 2

    Or how about because Google are a few steps shy of becoming Weyland Yutani? I understand a corporation has to diversify, eggs and baskets and all that, but it doesn't mean I have to support them in that effort.

  36. "I'd like to avoid supporting Google/Android," by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Your only other choice then is supporting Apple/iOS, and that is by far worse an outcome.

    1. Re: "I'd like to avoid supporting Google/Android," by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      There are at least here other active smartphone platforms out there...

      Windows Phone: probably not something the poster would consider, and while some of the WP7 models had hardware keyboards I don't think any WP8 ones do, so the hardware and OS would be nearly as obsolescent anyhow. Hackability, on the other hand... Well, a WP7 device with a suitably modified custom ROM might almost work, but it won't be Linux. Most WP8 devices don't have much in the way of hacks at all. If you were to go this route, the phone I would recommend is the HTC 7 Pro / HTC Arrive (same thing really, once just being a CDMA variant) - good hardware keyboard, custom ROM support, outdated but still better specs than the N900.

      Blackberry: best bet for a hardware keyboard, and you can get relatively modern hardware for cheap from them, but I don't know how you feel about the company. Hackability is a question, though; I don't know how hard it is to get at their guts, but it's probably not easy. A valid option if you just want a decent hardware-keyboard-equipped smartphone, but otherwise probably not a great option. Not sure what model would suit best.

      Jolla Sailfish: still in development and arguably not yet release-ready. The obvious advantage here is the Maemo roots underpinning the Sailfish OS; from a Linux-user/tinkerer point of view, it's probably the closest option for an N900 successor. "Politically" speaking, it's probably the best option as well. Currently you'd need to give up the hardware keyboard, though. That should change, and probably quite soon, but it's too early to say for sure how well Jolla will be able to iterate on their product. It's a cool idea, though!

      Yes, I'm aware that all three of those, combined, have *maybe* 10% of the global smartphone marketshare. Oh well. Your claim of "only other choice" is still wrong.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  37. No idea what you want to do with it by matbury · · Score: 1

    We have no idea of what you want to do with your phone. What does a "power user" use their phone for? Are all "power users" the same? If you post something more meaningful, perhaps you can get more meaningful answers.

    I have my phone. It does everything I want very well. I have no idea if it'd be useful to you.

  38. Ubuntu on Android by nashv · · Score: 1

    If you are ready to live on the edge (you must be since you brought the first mass-produced Maemo phone), buy a Nexus phone and try Ubuntu for Android.

    Since Google makes no money on sale of Android phones, not using the Android part would mean you are not supporting Google/Android (whatever reasons you have for it).

    --
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    1. Re: Ubuntu on Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's about as close "to the edge" as drinking energy drinks and playing video games on your Xbox/ps.

      As in, not very.

  39. Try emerging operating systems by camplus2 · · Score: 1

    With Nexus 4 you can try Ubuntu Touch and Sailfish OS, maybe more

    1. Re:Try emerging operating systems by camplus2 · · Score: 1

      Google Nexus 4 is N9000 today!

    2. Re: Try emerging operating systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, finally somebody who mentions that both Jolla's Sailfish OS and Ubuntu are coming to the Nexus 4 and probably 5.

  40. Neo900, Jolla Phone by sadov · · Score: 2

    Neo900 OpenMoko GTA04-based platform in N900 slider-case. Support many Linux distros, may be interest OpenSource SW & HW hackers.

    Monoblock Jolla Phone with a SailFish OS -- more user-oriented platform designed by former NOKIA Maemo/MeeGo developers.

  41. The obvious answer is to get a Neo900 by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its got (or will have once it goes on sale) all the good things about a N900 plus a faster CPU (not as fast as the latest iPhone or Android device though), better cellular radios and more.

  42. Bluetooth keyboard by crow · · Score: 2

    On thing to consider is getting a Bluetooth keyboard. You can also use a regular USB keyboard with most any smart phone with a USB OTG cable. Of course, carrying around a separate keyboard may not be convenient depending on how you use the device. I would think someone probably makes a small Bluetooth keyboard designed to be carried with a phone.

    Hmmm. Maybe I should Google that? Hey, what do you know? You can get a Bluetooth keyboard that is designed to attach to your smart phone, sliding out just like a built-in keyboard would.

    I haven't used one, but with a number of options available, this is likely the best route to go. You might want a small one that you carry with you, and a full-sized one that you keep at home or work for more extensive use.

    1. Re:Bluetooth keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a Bluetooth keyboard that is designed to attach to your smart phone, sliding out just like a built-in keyboard would.

      Where? I've only seen them for iPhones.

    2. Re:Bluetooth keyboard by crow · · Score: 1

      Google it.

      I found several for the Galaxy S3 (which I have). I'm sure they have them for others.

      One that I found had horrible reviews on Amazon, but there were others available, so hopefully there's at least one good one. (This is an obvious market opportunity for Blackberry, along with selling their email service as an app.)

  43. Get a Pre 3 by Lispy · · Score: 2

    It's got a hardware keyboard, Linux underneath, homebrew scene going strong and a bunch of apps that you might find useful, ymmv. Battery life is 3 days with powersaver and data switching on/off on demand. Really everything you could ask for if you want a decent specced/priced smartphone which is a bit newer than your n900, sports a great capacitive touchscreen and since obsolete ecosystems seem to be your thing, welcome on board: www.http://webosnation.com

    1. Re:Get a Pre 3 by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Wow, cat got my tongue: http://www.webosnation.com

  44. Firefox OS by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Firefox OS by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

      ...with portable bluetooth keyboard

    2. Re:Firefox OS by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Firefox OS, aka "Boot to Geko" is actually just a web browser running on top of a linux kernel with a minimal interface between the two. It's great if you like web technologies (HTML, CSS, JS, ...) but not if you want something close to a desktop GNU/Linux system. Even Android is better in this regard.
      You can probably hack Firefox OS to get a UNIX shell, run native code, etc... but AFAIK, it is against Mozilla's philiosophy so don't expect much support.

  45. next device? by tleaf100 · · Score: 0

    i would try pda db.net. decide what you actualy need /want from a device and then try their device finder.

  46. I got a replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the writer I had also been in love with my Nokia N900.

    I replaced it with a super model. Whilst no one can reach me anymore, I see this as a bonus. The features on my super model are superb. Apart from the occasional problem with her throwing phones at assistants, I have no complaints.

    I strongly recommend any of you who are looking for a replacement of their old phone to consider doing the same.

  47. Re: I had a N900 too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ugh. Androids drivers are a mess and cyanogen just makes that more apparent. My n900 has a specialized kernel, injection and monitor mode, overclocking, and they even made better camera drivers. With cyanogen mod the opposite happens...things break. Some hardware just completely is unusable. Android is nothing at all like the n900 was, and google will never let that happen anyway. Nor do the manufacturers want it.

    As for Debian on an android? Yo dawg, i heard you like Linux, but since you can't have Linux we put some virtualized Linux in your virtualized Linux.

  48. SOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but there simply is not a "good" smartphone on the market, you're basically stuck with two similar, but not great environments
    Android: which is a pain in the ass, second tier support, and if you're lucky, sometimes affordable.
    iOS: Which is safe and functional, just about everything works out of the box without needing to tinker, first tier support.

    First tier support, means that the company that manufactures it, takes responsibility for all problems with it. Second tier support means that the manufacturer only warrants the hardware and doesn't care if the software works properly, or at all. So if you feel that the Android device doesn't do what you want it to do, you're free to install your own OS on it, but you're still SOL if there are are poor driver support for what you want to do with it. I wish Google would just drop the Java crap already.

    For the most part, software designed for the iPhone, works, on all devices, in every country, regardless of the carrier. Not so of Android. This entire "making google play optional" bit that some manufacturers have been doing (and not just on smartphones, smarttv's too) is just serving to fragment it further. Sure you may buy an Android device, but you are not guaranteed to have any third party software function on it. Nokia's software wasn't even this bad and Nokia's software was all C++

    But you said N900, and the closest thing you'll get to an n900 now is an Android device... you can even boot Android on the n900, not that it will improve it any. But in all honestly I'm firmly in the Apple iOS camp because the fragmentation on Android is just so stupid that that you have no guarantee that you will ever be able to install anything made after the date of purchase.

    1. Re:SOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're spewing FUD about Android without owning any actual devices. I'm really poor, so Ican only afford older low-end used devices, yet they've been easy to root, very stable and about 90% of the apps written to include their particular OSversion -- which Ican download from any repository or site Ichoose -- work just fine.

      I'm not a fangirl, either -- personally, I'm holding off on replacing my old phone (Android 2.3) as much as Ican, in hope that a challenger in the mobile arena (like Jolla, Firefox, whatever)will release a customizable non-overpriced phone that gets a nice solid community releasing apps/ROMs for it, because Ihate the privacy situation. I'm just saying that the OS/devices are more than fine for average, everyday use.

  49. Re:I had a N900 too... by dave562 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Agreed. A rooted Android phone with a decent mod on it is as close as you can get to a Unix box in your pocket. The lack of a physical keyboard is a drag, but with a decent stock keyboard replacement like SwiftKey, it is not the end of the world.

    I recently put Cyanogenmod on my droid razr and actually got geeked out on my phone again. Everything just works like it should. The ROMs that come from the phone companies are bloated and inefficient. Do not make the mistake of judging the Android ecosystem by what you see in the stores.

    There are even some useful utilities for Android. (http://ultimatepeter.com/freakin-cool-hacking-apps-for-android/)

  50. Re: I had a N900 too... by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 2

    No need to virtualise, one can run it in a chroot.

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
  51. Jailbroken iphone with sshd by fsiefken · · Score: 1

    I can run basic unix utilities and vim very well by using ssh and logging in locally on my jailbroken iphone, it has a unix base after all. I believe there are phones you can hack and install linux on. Add a bluetooth keyboard. An ipad mini with slim keyboard cover fits in my coat pocket, i use voip for my phone.

  52. Well Rydia... by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does your N900 cast Fire or summon Odin?

    1. Re:Well Rydia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does both, constantly.

  53. Re:I had a N900 too... by ZXDunny · · Score: 2

    Agreed. A rooted Android phone with a decent mod on it is as close as you can get to a Unix box in your pocket. The lack of a physical keyboard is a drag, but with a decent stock keyboard replacement like SwiftKey, it is not the end of the world.

    What about the OpenPandora? That's an actual linux box in your pocket, keyboard included.

    --
    10 PRINT "SCUNTHORPE"(2 TO 5): GO TO 10
  54. Get an iPhone and jailbreak it by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You want great hardware with a LOT of software options and a high degree of hackability?

    Buy an iPhone (or iPad mini) and jailbreak it.

    You aren't feeding your personal information to advertisers or Google. You have great customization of privacy per-app, built in - which you can further customize with jailbreak utilities.

    Furthermore NO device is as hackable in the correct sense of the word as the iPhone is, because most apps are written in ObjectiveC if you want to modify some small aspect of an existing app you can do so.

    If you really need a hardware keyboard, key a good Bluetooth keyboard (just as you would with any Android device as pretty much all of them are touchscreen only now).

    You also get a lot of great VNC and terminal options on iOS that you can simply buy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Get an iPhone and jailbreak it by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Furthermore NO device is as hackable in the correct sense of the word as the iPhone is, because most apps are written in ObjectiveC if you want to modify some small aspect of an existing app you can do so.

      Except, you know, the N900 where it was basically Linux and you chold just dump/edit some BASH, or replace core utilities with hacked ones or do whatever the heck you liked.

      The iPhone is nothing at all like the N900.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Get an iPhone and jailbreak it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore NO device is as hackable in the correct sense of the word as the iPhone is, because most apps are written in ObjectiveC if you want to modify some small aspect of an existing app you can do so.

      I'm curious... Objective-C is typically compiled to binary, are you implying that modifying binary code is easy?

      I do wonder if your post is meant to be sarcasm, I can build a completely custom image for a large chunk of Android phones and replace the system components completely. (Aside from the few binary blobs like graphics drivers and modem firmware, ect).

    3. Re:Get an iPhone and jailbreak it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this, I tried windows phone, Android and Iphone as a possible replacement for the N900 and frankly all of them fail to live up. Even the celebrated interfaces of these phones are a downgrade and require more actions to be executed for most things... I am keeping my eye on Jolla and Neo900.

    4. Re:Get an iPhone and jailbreak it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical Apple zealot. iPhones are too little to serious usage. Stick to your flying pigs and other shovelware, and try to stop pretending your choice of a girls' phone is suitable for everyone else.

    5. Re:Get an iPhone and jailbreak it by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I'm curious... Objective-C is typically compiled to binary, are you implying that modifying binary code is easy?

      Yes, it's called MobileSubstrate. You create code you want to go somewhere in an application, and you can override any method call in the application with your own code.

      There's a jailbreak utility called Flex that makes this even easier.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  55. HTC Desire Z by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. I have CyanogenMod 10 on mine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  56. I still have an N900 by dskoll · · Score: 2

    I bought it on ebay about a year ago and I love it. Why do you need to replace your N900 if it works? And if it doesn't work, why not buy another one? I'm sure you can find one online.

  57. Jolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jolla is made by ex. Nokia engineers and runs Sailfish, a Linux based OS.
    It is however missing 4G/LTE and some other details (some are in software and will be fixed soon).
    It is available in EU, Switzerland and Norway thru Jolla's webshop.

  58. Jolla... by DrYak · · Score: 1

    that the developers are still almost as closed off and unresponsive as the maemo and meego team at Nokia.

    Technically, the developers *are* the maemo/meego team at Nokia. Or were formelly, before splitting away.

    but I still have hope that the Jolla will actually develop into something even nicer, eventually, maybe.

    Unlike most other open project (like openmoko, for exemple), Jolla, because of this background, have probably much more know how and experience putting actual phone on the market. So I'm also expecting that in the long run they are going to do quite well.

    They already managed to sell a phone which after all is more or less decent.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  59. trying to move on with S3 by fikx · · Score: 1

    I'm currently giving a try at leaving my beloved n900 behind with an S3. The hack-ability of the n900 was fun to have but it wasn't something I relied on. I actually like the n900 as a good phone. The real motivation was to move to more modern hardware ( better radio, better battery life, some extra CPU , etc.) but the biggest reason was to be on a supported platform. Any apps or such that come out are either Apple or Android. Things like work apps and latest apps of any type were off-limits on the n900. But, so far the S3 doesn't quite hit the same buttons as the n900 on just plain smartphone usability. The s3 was a compromise for price vs functionality, given I was going to loose features no matter what I paid (why pay for the top-of-the-line when it's still not as good as I have now?).
    Things I liked in the n900 that are missing: Landscape mode as default (I prefer this, Android has it as a late add-on so not supported everywhere). Hardware keyboard (just no getting past how useful that is). Cover for the camera lens (protects it form scratches in a pocket or pouch). Instant access to camera (tied to the above cover, flip it open and camera starts automatically. great convenience). The plugin nature of the contacts app (you can download additions to it to increase the kinds of contacts details it can handle without jumping to another app) Sound worked better (android seems to get confused when jumping between earphones, speaker, Bluetooth when routing sounds. Alerts can go to speakers even when earphone plugged in, system sounds don't always go through Bluetooth when it's connected, can't reliably make it silent since some things will override that), and mostly just being able to change something if I didn't like it. I guess that's a vote on the hack-ability of the n900 but I did the minimum just tweaking things that I didn't like. Another more "fuzzy" thing is just better interface: seems like I'm having to do more clicks to get anywhere in Android. The N900 seemed well thought out and very consistent across the whole phone. Oh, and what is the issue with not including text notes by default? As a PDA veteran, taking text notes is a must for a portable device, yet seems like it's been forgotten except for add-on in most modern devices. And I like the X based interface...can't count how many times I forwarded an app to the phone in a pinch to get to something on my PC. I'll miss that
    Things I have now: better connection to towers. seemed like the n900 was having more trouble talking to towers as time went on with more drops, less bars on average, etc. Supported platform: can buy accessories and find software more easily. I am supported with work and other apps. Much better battery life, although I had no issues plugging the n900 in each night, but it's still nice to get 2 days on a charge. One of the nicer things is support for MMS built in: the n900 had an app for it but it maintained separate menus and interface from regular messaging. That was another work related convenience that pushed me.
    So, I'm making myself do without some things just to get the few important (mostly work related) features I consider critical for future.

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  60. Nokia Lumia 1020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best phone I've ever owned, best camera on any phone period.

    Why all the uncertainty? Nokia still makes good phones.

    1. Re:Nokia Lumia 1020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off that thing runs Windows, so it is marked as a POS from the start. Secondly, there is no hardware keyboard....which is a must according to the poster. Seriously, there must be a enough of market for a real computer that that a nerd can carry in his pocket that can make phone calls somewhere in the world right?

  61. Neo900.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their initial funding goal was met .

    http://neo900.org/news-0003-we-ve-reached-our-goal

  62. Re:I had a N900 too... by denis.b.bergeron · · Score: 2

    Lot of mainstream android phone can have a physical keyboard casing, I got one for me s3 on dx.com very usefull to have a full keyboard with a small package.

  63. Love my N9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Nokia N9 running a linux distro and it is smaller and great. Found all the apps I need. Great battery life, camera, reception. No keyboard but I have adjusted.

  64. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point? They are all wiretapped at the CO with PEN registers. They all have phantom firmwares that completely wiretap Your life, as per the Communications Act of 1996.

  65. Sailfish OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look out for a https://sailfishos.org/ phone that I beleive will be coming onto the market some time later this year (if all goes well). It will the spiritual successor to the N900 as a lot of the people working on it are from the Nokia crew that worked on the N900 and Meego OS.

  66. Re:I had a N900 too... by foobar+bazbot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Easy enough. Get any recent phone that's supported by Cyanogenmod. Install Cyanogenmod. Then install Debian (or similar). This can be accomplished as a dual boot or as a chroot inside Android.

    Or as neither.
    I like Sven-Ola's debian kit which takes advantage of the (mostly) disjoint directory structure of Android and Debian (or rather LSB) to run Debian and Android in the same root. The benefit over chroot is that you can plug in a USB drive, SD card, etc. and instantly have access in /Removable/Foo for both Android and Debian apps, as well as the ability to use Debian programs (e.g. text editor) in the Android hierarchy. You can get the same functionality with enough bind mounts, but debian-kit makes it a lot simpler IMO.

    I'd also recommend zshaolin for those looking for a friendly *n*x environment without installing a whole distribution, or if they don't have and can't/won't get root access.

  67. Re: I had a N900 too... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

    Ugh. Androids drivers are a mess and cyanogen just makes that more apparent. My n900 has a specialized kernel, injection and monitor mode, overclocking, and they even made better camera drivers. With cyanogen mod the opposite happens...things break. Some hardware just completely is unusable. Android is nothing at all like the n900 was, and google will never let that happen anyway. Nor do the manufacturers want it.

    As for Debian on an android? Yo dawg, i heard you like Linux, but since you can't have Linux we put some virtualized Linux in your virtualized Linux.

    I'm reasonably certain Google does not give a hoot what you do with your android phone. Manufacturers and more commonly, carriers, are the ones that do not want you messing about. See Google Nexus. Your carrier is going to want you messing about with a maemo phone just as much as they want you messing about with android or iOS devices.

    I run cyanogen. Sometimes things break. How often depends on ow well supported your device is. It's not the end of the world, or hasn't been for me so far. Much like Linux on a non mainstream device, stability depends on the combined efforts of the development community and the manufacturer. For someone capable of and interested in modifying an OS kernel, I find it hard to believe this would be a roadblock.

  68. Re:I had a N900 too... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

    Agreed. A rooted Android phone with a decent mod on it is as close as you can get to a Unix box in your pocket. The lack of a physical keyboard is a drag, but with a decent stock keyboard replacement like SwiftKey, it is not the end of the world.

    I recently put Cyanogenmod on my droid razr and actually got geeked out on my phone again. Everything just works like it should. The ROMs that come from the phone companies are bloated and inefficient. Do not make the mistake of judging the Android ecosystem by what you see in the stores.

    There are even some useful utilities for Android. (http://ultimatepeter.com/freakin-cool-hacking-apps-for-android/)

    Bluetooth Keyboard. http://www.logitech.com/en-us/... is what I use
    Or you could get something much cheaper like this: http://www.amazon.com/Bluetoot...
    There are also cell phone cases with integrated Bluetooth keyboards to turn many phones into "sliders".

  69. a windows phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get one of those lumias.
    The os sucks a little bit, but I still really like that hardware, and the fact that my gps actually works without internet.

  70. Re: I had a N900 too... by Boltronics · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Chroot's still aren't as good. My N900 could run some games I made using PyGAME (all I had to do was something like sudo apt-get install python-pygame) and it was good to go - ran the game just as well as my laptop did, with acceleration. Beautiful.

    Unfortunately my N900 screen broke for a second time last year, and I threaded one of the screws trying to replace it, so I too found myself looking for a replacement phone. Even with overclocking the N900 was painfully slow on complex websites, so I wanted something modern but with a hardware keyboard. I couldn't find anything except possibly the Neo900 (which didn't have an ETA at the time - and I wouldn't have been able to wait for anyway), so I decided that I would get the biggest screen I could find - the logic being that if I have to use a virtual keyboard I want it to provide an experience as close to a hardware keyboard as possible.

    Hence, I now run a Sony Xperia Z Ultra with the Hacker's Keyboard. Obviously not as good as a hardware keyboard, but the screen size means the virtual keyboard can fit all keys I had on the N900 (and then some) and still have plenty of room to see the text-box I'm typing into.

    The Xperial Z Ultra also has expandable storage so a chroot is feasible, and I admit I've used this phone much more than my N900 due to it being more practical for games, e-mail, taking pictures, etc. Sony also provide instructions on unlocking the bootloader. However, lacking a true GNU userland environment for the primary OS, along with lacking the ease of gaining root and lacking a replaceable battery) are things I really miss. I also hate how much of the bloatware cannot be removed, although it can be disabled. It is waterproof though, so it's got that going for it.

    I nuked or disabled almost everything related to Sony and Google Play and installed F-Droid instead, and then proceeded to install Firefox Mobile, K-9 and APG, Xabber, TTRSS-Reader, VLC, Open Explorer, Barcode Scanner, Terminal Emulator, Cool Reader, Document Viewer, Aard, OsmAnd~, ScummVM, AnkiDroid, World Clock, VX ConnectBot, a few ownCloud-related sync apps... and of course Frozen Bubble, and now Android can do most of the things I would have used my N900 for.

    --
    It's GNU/Linux dammit!
  71. Re:I had a N900 too... by quenda · · Score: 2

    Even for non-hackers, it had substantial advantages over the iPhone 3GS at the time. This was the days of IOS3, when copy&paste was considered a cutting-edge feature, and multi-tasking was only allowed for Apple's own built-in apps.
    Only later when the iphone4 with retina display, and IOS4 came out, did the n900 start looking old.
    Of course there was a price in thickness and weight for all the extra hardware features of the n900.

  72. the important thing is scriptability and control by KWTm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's important to establish what makes the N900 great. Can't speak for the OP, but this is what I'm hoping for in a phone once my N900 finally gives up the ghost. "Hoping," notice I said, but I'm not holding my breath.

    1. Scriptability. First and foremost. *I* want to be the one in control of the phone, not some app developer vetted by The Place That Decides What You Can Do With Our --I Mean Your-- Phone (or "AppStore" for short). I want to write a bash script, or a python script, and tell me when my beloved has sent me a SMS containing the word "URGENT".

    2. Freedom. Yes, I mean openness as in open source. Yes, I do know not everything in the N900 was open-sourced, but a heck of a lot of it was. That let a lot of people hack it, for the benefit of the community. And it didn't void the warranty. There's something to be said for a phone that does not need you to join the Apple club with a credit card, or sign up with Big Brother Google before using the phone -- you really are independent.

    3. Portability of software. It's awesome that I can run Gnumeric on this thing, but even more important that I run Vim.

    4. Three things you can change: the cell phone provider, the battery, and the memory storage card. Mainly a criticism compared to the early iPhones; not sure if they still apply. I understand that there are unlocked iPhones now (which still cost more than the N900 did) but you can't change the battery. Android phones will take microSD now, I think?

    In fact, to lower my chances of being forced to make do without a good alternative, I bought a second N900, and regularly synchronize the spare so I can have it up and running in case it's needed quickly. I wasn't seeing anything on the horizon, and figured I'd probably have to hang on to my pair of N900's for at least another 3 years. This Slashdot discussion is very useful.

    There are, of course, lots to hate about the N900. Most of it deals with the slow swapping caused by the relatively small RAM, versus the large RAM that would be needed by a truly multitasking computer/smartphone. (Compare this with the iPhone that was out at the time, which did not multitask. Do iPhones multitask yet?) The user interface is also unintuitive and poorly thought out. Wish it had been given a chance, but once Elop came on board, there was zero chance of that.

    As I've said before, the N900 is a piece of crap --but it's the BEST piece of crap in the world!

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  73. Buy another one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy another one?

    I fell in love with my Motorola Q9c. Then its screen cracked a few years later just sitting on at able. Turns out a Canadian telecom still sold them (Telus I think it was?) Then that one got broke in an accident just last year. Guess what? Still new ones available, picked my current one up for $80 NIB.

    I know N900's are worshiped to a stupid degree, but you can get new and refurbished ones all over the place. FGS use Google!

  74. Best option is jailbroken iphone 5S by PacoSF · · Score: 1

    Once rooted/jailbroken: You won't be sorry w a 64-bit LTE phone + camera is excellent. It's a favorable window right now, where you can exist on the current OS and still restore and jailbreak. It's been http://ultimatepeter.com/how-t...

  75. Fairphone by bug1 · · Score: 1

    Im also lookign to replace my N900 (which i like), previously had an OpenMoko Neo (which was a great talking piece, bad phone).

    Im currently keeping an eye on the fairphone, they are just finishing there first batch of 25,000 phones and looking at a new order soon. Second release is usually a good one to get in one as they have had a chance to find and fix hardware bugs.

    The replicant project has done a review of the fairphone, there biggest criticim of it is that it doest have good hardware isolation to prevent NSA type spying. It isnt supported by replicant yet, but say it should be possible.
    http://www.replicant.us/2013/1...

    It looks like the project is more driven ideology rather than profit, but that ideology is very much focused on the phone. I hope they do well.

    http://www.fairphone.com/

  76. Audio quality? by dwater · · Score: 1

    The biggest thing I noticed when moving from the N900 to the N950 (and, therefore, also N9) was the improvement in audio quality. The n950 made the n900 sound distinctly bland and wooly.

    So, I now wonder if the Neo900 upgrade replaces the audio bits so that the audio improves too. Do you know?

    --
    Max.
    1. Re:Audio quality? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      So, I now wonder if the Neo900 upgrade replaces the audio bits so that the audio improves too. Do you know?

      You mean phone audio, right? That wasn't so great, but it was also a little quiet, so the quality problem wasn't that noticeable. The Neo900 specs don't really address audio quality/hardware except to note (a little obtusely, in the "feasibility" document):

      The RX51 uses a separate audio codec (tlv320aic34?) maybe because the one in the TWL4030 did not work at market launch.

      The TPS65950 is available in the third redesign of the original TWL4030 and works well for all functions in the GTA04. So there does not seem to be any need for a separate solution.

      Due to audio management in fremantle is mostly closed blobs we may need the original TLV320AIC34, since reverse-engineering of the complete audio management seems impossible.

      Risk to miss mission goal when changing this detail to work different than in RX51: high! TLV320aic34: ~[$]10, available but duplicates the same functions as are already available in TPS65950 ~[$]5.

      So it sounds like the original audio chip will be replaced with a newer version of an integrated device . . . or not.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  77. New battery by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    I had a similar issue with my phone (top of the line back in 2005), battery lasting less than fourteen hours some days (more roaming searching) and bulging. Got a brand new battery on eBay for a few dollars with free shipping, hopefully good for another decade or so.

  78. Ars Technica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rydia must be Ron Amadeo. It perfectly explains the need for a new phone that avoids Google / Android at all costs and is too ignorant to look into iOS or WP 8 offerings.

  79. go shopping you lazy ass by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    really go to any radio shack or mall and fucking look for a phone that suits your wants and meets your budget, why is this a question on slashdot

    1. Re:go shopping you lazy ass by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      You must have no idea what the n900 was if you think that's a valid solution. Such outlets would never even consider carrying something like what he wants these days.

      Odds are his best solution will be a mix of both what phone to buy and which hacks to apply to it. Which seems a pretty decent thing to ask Slashdot about, since it's numerous steps each with numerous options and numerous incompatibilities and oddities.

  80. Re:I had a N900 too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OpenPandora ... what a great name

  81. You can get them "new" by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I sent a friend's N900 off for repair last year and an unused one came back along with the faulty one which they hadn't bothered to repair.
    I'll probably use the faulty one (which I have now) as a GPS or something since the fault does not completely disable it.

  82. Jolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a Jolla as a christmas present for myself when my N900 broke down. I must say, now it feels like I have a modern smartphone. It still has some rough patches, but they seem active in updating it.

    Of course, the lack of HW keyboard has its pros/cons. The phone is much slimmer than N900, but text input is a bit slow. Maybe there will be an Other Half keyboard as others have hoped. I myself would be happy with some faster input methods like swype.

  83. Re:I had a N900 too... by dbIII · · Score: 1

    True, but inconvenient which is why I still use mine despite much faster hardware being available.
    Also I've used my computer keyboard and mouse on my N900 with X2X and a wireless connection so a separate bluetooth keyboard especially for the phone does not impress :)

  84. This by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Backlit LCD screens suck immensely in bright sunlight, so here's an alternative I hope will catch on:
    http://onyx-boox.com/coming-so...
    Pocketbook and Yotta has similar concepts but lack of touch on the Pocketbook addon for the Galaxy S3 looks like a huge drawback to me.

  85. Overstock has droids for bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    overstock.com has android phones, and even cool bar phones for bitcoin. many of them dual sim. just saying.

    1. Re:Overstock has droids for bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overstock.com is a fucking rip-off.

  86. Same boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Neo900 is our only chance. FirefoxOS is open source but has Android roots. Also the dev community is difficult and unresponsive.

  87. Puzzled - isnt N900 rooted Nexus 5 ? by sandGorgons · · Score: 1

    Not trying to flamebait here, but genuinely puzzled - what is possibly so great about the N900 versus something like a rooted Nexus 5? I see comments about cyanogenmod, etc. being a bit unstable - but comparing it to the N900, where very few people actually cared about building the OS ? The next version of the VM - ART - is nothing to sneeze at as well.
    I'm not sure if you know, but when you install cyanogenmod (or one of the hundred different ROMS that people are actively developing on xda-developers), you get a Google free operating system. There is NO integration with Google. It is only if you install the "gapps" package, that you get the whole google shebang - play store, services, etc.
    As a hacker friendly phone, I can develop on the N5 using Python, Golang, Scala, C#/Mono, QT, etc. - is there a usecase at which the N900 blows this out of the water ?
    The only valid point I can think about is the keyboard - yes, it is a paradigm shift. But for daily use, smart keyboards like Swiftkey, Touchpal (pure open source) will serve you very well. For your developer needs, connect a monitor through HDMI/MHL and use a microusb adapter .
    You have a first grade terminal emulator, IRC, low power bluetooth, built-in VPN + tethering - I would argue much more suitable for the developer than the venerable N900. Did I mention quad core processor, GPU and 2 GB of RAM with a brilliant display ?
    If you want, you can install other OSes on the phone.

  88. Life after N900 by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 1

    I was facing the same problem as you are, and I would have gotten myself an N9 if Nokia hadn't announced that they would ditch Meego completely. That day I decided I was done with Nokia for good and I was forced to find a viable alternative.

    To me it was Android on a Galaxy S2, but - and this is important - one built entirely from source. Granted - there are still things I miss from my N900 (the keyboard mostly), but a rooted Android device comes close these days.

    Personally I would look for any Android device that is well supported by Cyanogenmod (Nexus for example), ditch the stock firmware immediately and go straight for a Cyanogenmod 11. There are things you will be missing from the N900, but there are also a lot of stuff that was never possible on the N900 which will now work fine.

  89. replicant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Choose an android phone on this list http://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki

    Install replicant, which is a 100% open source android fork. Get your software from f-droid, or compile it yourself.

  90. Re:I had a N900 too... by smallfries · · Score: 2

    No. I can't speak for the GP but I was definitely in the target demographic and the n900 was shit.
    I've been a programmer for about 30 years, my normal environment is vim and a shell. The keyboard and screen size on the n900 were too compromised to make it an effective or productive environment. During the couple of years that I had it I took in on holiday once and spent two weeks on a beach trying to write code on it. After I got back I rewrote the two weeks of coding in about an hour. Trying to code on a hunt and peck thumb board that required escapes for most punctuation symbols was a waste of time.

    Since then I've been very happy with an iPhone 4 as the touchscreen keyboard is equally effective / ineffective as the hardware keyboard. My next foray into a portable coding environment will be a glass competitor with better specs, a unix environment and some kind of twiddled interface although I am hoping the myo armband pans out.

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  91. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Scriptability. First and foremost. *I* want to be the one in control of the phone [maemo.org], not some app developer vetted by The Place That Decides What You Can Do With Our --I Mean Your-- Phone (or "AppStore" for short). I want to write a bash script, or a python script, and tell me when my beloved has sent me a SMS containing the word "URGENT".

    You may want to check out Tasker, it does this sort of stuff.

    Freedom. Yes, I mean openness as in open source. Yes, I do know not everything in the N900 was open-sourced,

    Then whats the problem with Android?

  92. Neo 900 by kamathln · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://neo900.org/

    Seems like the best alternative for a hacker right now.

  93. only water-proofness lacking by pereric · · Score: 1

    Only lack of water-proofness made me stop using my N900. In a very concrete fashion, alas. I actually miss the software, too. What you could find in the repos (some 10,000:s of packages?) was imho way better than the 500,000+ packages availible for Android. For example the "mappero" map app beat what you could find on android (which probably would be orux), at least back in the days. And most of it was free-as-in-speech software. No ads, no spying, much less risk trusting the software. And quite well inviting you to participate hacking too ...

  94. Re:I had a N900 too... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Actually I suspect the Nokia Communicator was the 1st Gen and the N900 was more second or third Gen

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  95. Spoken like a true Microsoft shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft wanted its own ad empire (aQuantive) and its own social media empire (so dot cl). Both failed, so it portrays itself as a champion of privacy.

    Those who learn from history over the past few decades should know better than to trust Microsoft. Microsoft can never ever be trusted. No compromises, no exceptions, no gray areas.

  96. Nokia E7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's also getting a bit old. Yes, the last big update broke some of the editing functionality that made the 'phone great. Yes, MS are trying to get their greasy little mitts on my 'phone (Adding MS Office file readers are not a system upgrade - stick them in the app store).

    But... it's got the keyboard, the hardware's nice and the OS is still Symbian. PuTTY handles the keyboard - what more do you need?

  97. Re:I had a N900 too... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    OpenPandora's not a phone, and its hardware is stupidly weak for the price - they specced and priced it when it was designed, and then it took forever to launch. By the time it did, it was already outclassed by 2+ generations of cell phone.

  98. Re:I had a N900 too... by ZXDunny · · Score: 2

    Well, I can certainly agree that it's under-spec at this point in time. Problem is that there's still no competition out there that matches what it can do even with the low-power. Full keyboard, game controls and a desktop linux installation? There aren't any cell-phones that to my knowledge can do all that and still fit in your pocket without external peripherals.

    --
    10 PRINT "SCUNTHORPE"(2 TO 5): GO TO 10
  99. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    1. Scriptability. First and foremost. *I* want to be the one in control of the phone

    There are lots of automation/scripting apps for Android, or with root you can get a real shell and install the scripting language of your choice.

    2. Freedom. Yes, I mean openness as in open source.

    As far as I know the only platform that offers that is AOSP/Cyanogen, with caveats about binary drivers etc.

    3. Portability of software. It's awesome that I can run Gnumeric on this thing, but even more important that I run Vim.

    Looking at the N900 keyboard I don't think Vim would be very usable, but all modern devices support Bluetooth keyboards. Again, various Vi based editors, including actual Vi, are available for Android.

    4. Three things you can change: the cell phone provider, the battery, and the memory storage card.

    Maybe a Galaxy S4, or the older and cheaper but still extremely capable S3. I'm sure there are others that fit these requirements but those are the two that spring to mind.

    About the only other option I can think of is to wait for some Firefox OS or Ubuntu phones to appear, but that might be a while.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  100. Captivate Glide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it's android, but it has a hardware keyboard.

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Samsung-Captivate-Glide-SGH-I927-8GB-Black-AT-T-Smartphone-82448-/331111542751?pt=Cell_Phones&hash=item4d17c92fdf

  101. Re:I had a N900 too... by BitZtream · · Score: 0

    For what he paid for the N900, he could have had an iPhone and a developer account, making it effectively pretty close to the N900.

    But back to the post you are replying to ... the N900 was shit, it was just better than the other shit that was there at the time, until the iPhone came out, and thats why the N900 isn't made anymore.

    I had an N900 myself, just like I had a bunch of WinCE devices including a SX66 blue angel phone/pda. Anyone who owned one from before the iPhone knows that when they iPhone was released, it over night made every single preceding device look like a steaming pile of shit, but not even worth its weight as fertilizer.

    Nothing you can do on an N900 that you can't do on a iPhone as far as actually getting shit done. Sure, you can tweak your desktop (phonetop?) on the N900 ... big deal ... and useless. And certainly there is absolutely nothing an N900 does that you can't do on ANY android phone, regardless of how cheap it is. Hell, the original iPhone (2007) has more CPU power than the latest N900 (from 2009)!

    WTF are you thinking is great about the N900?

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  102. Re:I had a N900 too... by alex67500 · · Score: 1

    It was shit. I didn't really realise quite how shit it was until I upgraded to an iPhone. Never looked back since.

    It's not a phone for the general population. The N900 was a phone for hackers, developers, etc.: people who needed a pocket computer with phone functionality. Sort of the "anti-iPhone" in its philosophy. You were clearly not in the (tiny) target demographic, and whoever sold you yours was not your friend, didn't know you very well, or didn't as the right questions. (I just described a salesman, didn't I?)

    Don't worry, he just read on Slashdot that the N900 was cool so he bought it. And then he read a review of the iPhone of Reddit and bought it too.

  103. Re:I had a N900 too... by gomiam · · Score: 1

    Trying to code on a hunt and peck thumb board that required escapes for most punctuation symbols was a waste of time.

    Because you couldn't change the mapping, right? I agree that it's not the most comfortable keyboard ever, but I'm typing quite quickly with it, thank you.

  104. Re:I had a N900 too... by dinfinity · · Score: 1

    The lack of a physical keyboard is a drag

    Or just buy one with a physical keyboard?

    They exist and are fantastic.
    I imported the Motorola Droid 4 and am still absolutely delighted with it. I'll probably do the same for the Droid 5.

  105. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freedom. Yes, I mean openness as in open source. Yes, I do know not everything in the N900 was open-sourced,

    Then whats the problem with Android?

    There was a time when Android could be considered the most open modern phone platform. With the release of KitKat, that time is passing. It is slowly becoming as closed and locked in as the other major offerings.

    And for the GP, those are all the same reasons I went back to my N900 after two years of shuffling between Android, Blackberry and Windows Phone. Nothing else out there can match it for scripting and controlling the device myself, let alone the keyboard (the only modern phone with a better keyboard is the Motorola Photon 4G, and there are a million reasons to hate that phone). The only thing I would change about my N900 is better memory management and a better screen. Even with those handicaps, it's still the most capable phone in my collection, and I have devices from all corners of the past three years.

  106. TANSTAAFL by u38cg · · Score: 1

    If you're going to use an acronym, use it correctly...

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
    1. Re:TANSTAAFL by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      There ain't no such thing as a free Linux?

  107. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's something to be said for a phone that does not need you to join the Apple club with a credit card, or sign up with Big Brother Google before using the phone -- you really are independent.

    I have an Android phone. As far as it knows, I don't even have a Google account. I absolutely don't have a Gmail account.
    There are enough FLOSS apps you can download without signing up with anybody.

  108. A New Battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't a new battery solve it?

  109. BlackBerry Q10 by Vehstijul · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me why BlackBerry is so disregarded? I see a few posters saying that they love their Q10 (I love mine) - and people immediately jump on them saying that it's a sinking ship. Aside from their financial trouble, what exactly is wrong with the phones? The new OS is amazing, based on nerd-friendly QNX, and the keyboard is the best hardware keyboard you can get. The software keyboard on the all-touch devices is pretty damn good too. The only reason I keep hearing that people don't want a BlackBerry is because they're not doing well. Shouldn't quality of a product dictate what phone you get more than their status on the stock market?

    1. Re:BlackBerry Q10 by cboslin · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me why BlackBerry is so disregarded? I see a few posters saying that they love their Q10 (I love mine) - and people immediately jump on them saying that it's a sinking ship. Aside from their financial trouble, what exactly is wrong with the phones? The new OS is amazing, based on nerd-friendly QNX, and the keyboard is the best hardware keyboard you can get. The software keyboard on the all-touch devices is pretty damn good too. The only reason I keep hearing that people don't want a BlackBerry is because they're not doing well. Shouldn't quality of a product dictate what phone you get more than their status on the stock market?

      Its not rootable.

      Its not open.

      I can not install the software of my choosing on it.

      Does it have a microSD card slot for sharing data between the handheld, your laptop and your desktop PC? (Granted many larger corporations irrationally lock the USB slots down, which would be the same for SD card slots. Those same irrational large corporations are either no longer funding staff to perform the Windows automated updates or are planning too. Thus they lock out use of USB, but stop providing security updates to Windows machines, the most afflicted infection vector in the IT world! I call this mentality insanity. Stop expecting a different result!)

      Can I connect via WiFi with a BlackBerry?

      I don't need Microsoft Office, love LibreOffice, so any advantage with MS Office is a non-issue for many of us.

      I can run LibreOffice on my tablet / Linux handheld and love to not have to worry about the mindless data format upgrades by Microsoft that served no purpose and cost organizations significant dollars to convert their proprietary documents to the new format, only because Microsoft told them, they had too to run the latest version of MS Office.

      I don't need Adobe anything (including Flash) on my device, though occasionally I have to update the .so file, thanks to Adobe no longer supporting Linux but putting out a new security update for Windows. Never mind that when you drill down into the security exploits, 98% of the time they require local access. Meaning its a non issue if you do not hand over you device to another or give a cracker the keys to your home/apt!

      I could go on, but enough.

      BTW, Blackberry is a sinking ship! Its just a fact. Been watching the stock (marketwatch), BBRY (Google Finance), not sure they will survive, such is life for any company stupid enough to get in bed with Microsoft and Microsoft only applications and development tool chains.

      Almost every company that gets in bed with Microsoft is acquired or put out of business in 4 - 5 years from the start of that relationship.

      If a company's vertical market is lucrative, Microsoft will take it away from them or purchase the company within 4 to 5 years of the arrangement. There are many examples of this happening over the last 30 years. I wonder how many went out of business or saw their market share significantly eroded as Blackberry has? Had Blackberry catered to both Linux and Windows, they might still have a market and a business.

      Only Hyper FEARful corporate/government entities are bothering with Blackberry today.

      Yes FEAR is a motivator, however when a company acts out of fear primarily, without growing their company through new product offerings, its only a matter of time until they are diminished or gone.

      We are finally getting to the point, economically, where companies that have cut their way to stock increases are up against walls created primarily due to their letting so many employees knowledable about their market and business go, they are discovering it very difficult to change their mindsets from one of offshoring/layoffs to one of growth. This too is a normal part of the business cycle. Their loss.

    2. Re:BlackBerry Q10 by Vehstijul · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a Micro USB slot that opens up the Micro SD card to function as a HD (and it's lockable) as well as a direct WiFi sharing function.

      Not sure about all the Office needs, since all I need is really good messaging and a good keyboard, as well as a open filesystem so I can shuffle things around.

      Android and all the variants basically have all this, but I don't see any of them with a halfway decent keyboard, so I'm sticking with BlackBerry until the ship is sunk. Hopefully BlackBerry can stick with it, if only to keep options open.

  110. Re:I had a N900 too... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    True, but when you're looking to replace a cellphone, the utter lack of any cell phone capability does remove it from consideration. And at about 1/3 the price, it might be fun for the linux-loving gadget head (I was watching it with bated breath until I saw how much they wanted for the thing).

    "A full keyboard, game controls, and desktop linux on a 600mHz processor with 256MB ram" might be the only contender in it's space, but there's really a reason for that.

  111. Re:I had a N900 too... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    And yes, grammar nazis, I got the wrong "its" in there. I'll report for knuckle slapping after work.

  112. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, Android phones have had SD/MicroSD since the inception - the G1 had a microSDHC slot. It's the *lack* of microSD in favor of purely internal flash that's the recent development. Well, that, and trying to pretend that the SD's storage is just appended to the internal. (It isn't, it's mounted on a different directory, like any other SD card on a Unix box would be.) On the downside, they also did away with USB mass storage mode in favor of the rather yucky MTP stuff.

  113. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may want to check out Tasker, it does this sort of stuff.

    Please read the linked post. You completely missed the point.

  114. Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blackberry Q10?

  115. Re:I had a N900 too... by smallfries · · Score: 1

    Yes, exactly. For natural language it wasn't too bad, but for code it was painful. Being able to remap all of the punctuation (preferably with a mode-switch button on the touch screen) would have solved a lot of the issues.

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  116. Life after N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want an open-source phone, the Oppo N1 is now available. Comes with Cyanogenmod pre-installed. Pair it with a case/bluetoooth keyboard and it should work fine.

  117. Slashdot is in Google's pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guessed something like yours would be the first post and this is why.

  118. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rooted/Rom'd Nexus 5 without the Google stuff seems like it might fit your requirements pretty well. No need for a "big brother" account, it'd be a big upgrade from your current hardware, and there's a strong dev. community around it.

    I had some bash scripts to automate rsyncing pictures to my desktop from a rooted Android phone. Once BusyBox is installed you've got access to a very functional set of command line utilities on Android.

  119. iPhone, what else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $914 of Las Vegasian money latel, it solved all your aforementioned problems and procurements.

  120. Re:I had a N900 too... by gomiam · · Score: 1

    That's strange because you can change your keyboard mappings (and even cycle through them on the fly through Control-Space). I acknowledge it is not a simple procedure to set up, but once you do it you don't need to think too much about it.

  121. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are lots of automation/scripting apps for Android, or with root you can get a real shell and install the scripting language of your choice.

    The issue is with how well the scripts can hook into the OS and applications (I admit I haven't looked into this as it isn't a big deal to me, but that is the point that KWTm was getting at, and your response didn't quite address it).

    Looking at the N900 keyboard I don't think Vim would be very usable, but all modern devices support Bluetooth keyboards. Again, various Vi based editors, including actual Vi, are available for Android.

    I assure you Vim is very usable with the N900. Due to the open nature of the OS you can remap the keyboard how you like, personally I have escape mapped to the function key plus backspace which works for me (escape is included as a soft key in the default terminal app), and in the mapping you can combine shift with the function key to get another level of mappings, which helps deal with the limited number of keys on the N900's keyboard.

    I've just had a look at a few pages of Bluetooth keyboards on Amazon and couldn't find any that actually attach to the phone (aside from ones designed specifically for the iPhone), this is actually quite important as it means you otherwise have to find somewhere to put the phone while you use the keyboard, with a keyboard built in to or attached to the phone you can use the keyboard while holding the phone.

  122. Re:I had a N900 too... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    Strictly as a phone, sure, it's a bit clunky. What I loved was that I could run pretty much *anything* on it. The default repositories had everything from bejewelled, ring-tones and productivity tools to lighttpd, openssh (client AND server), openvpn and even a bittorrent client. I remember writing a fractal generator for one of my college classes (big multiprocessing assignment with IPC and everything) in SDL. I actually got it to run on the phone (using the chroot in the repository). It had python (by default) and a ridiculous amount of tools I have never seen on any phone since. Hell I even ran GIMP and OpenOffice on it (slow, but functional).

  123. Went with BlackBerry Z10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always find it fascinating when people state their requirements or personal preferences when asking for an opinion, then get responses such as why not this or why that and further starting to dig into those assumptions.. Anyways, I would have probably posted this exact same question some time ago. I had a pretty limited N85 that had to offer most of what I needed back in the day but decided to it's time for a refresh for various reasons. I've played around with the iPhone which wasn't really my fit, tried a few Android devices back in the day and I didn't find them too exciting either, however I decided to go ahead and get a not so expesive one and ended up with a T769. Long story short, it was a big disappointment since out of the box (yes I did play with 'ROMs' and whatnot) and lasted me just under 6months before I put it out of its misery and went back to the N85 for a while. Ended up getting a BB Z10 eventually and while some may argue certain features or apps are missing, it's been a great experience for me thus far.

  124. Focus on HARDWARE (Linux) not Android or Cellular by cboslin · · Score: 1

    I'd like to avoid supporting Google/Android, but there don't seem to be many options.

    I loved my N800 when I bought it years ago. Loved using Skype and WiFi to make all my calls.

    Than came the N880, the N900 and finally a Microsoft bonehead exec to Nokia that killed the toolset all those depended on. Even if Nokia were to apolgize and make amends for trashing that product line after realizing their Windows phone offerings are crapola, the same thing would probably just happen again in a year or two with the next bonehead executive that mistakenly thinks only Apple or Microsoft can make a good handheld. This was not true when I purchased my N800 in 2006/2007. So we must stop wasting time looking at anything other than a Linux root-able handheld. Even if they come with Android, if its root-able, you can put other Linux distros on it, just do your homework.

    Cellular must have ~ non root-able device that will NOT run the Linux distro of your choice!

    Google's Android is the ONLY root-able open source option in the cellular world. Sadly the cellular companies prefer to keep their product offerings locked down with no root access. Why they only offer Android in a restricted limited version. A non-rootable Android would most likely prevent you from adding what you want (a Linux distro other than Android) to add to your device.

    Rather than focus on the software that is "Android", focus on the hardware. Is it root-able? Can you install a Linux with a very small footprint on it (there are plenty of options)? If you focus on the hardware, it will run Linux, as all other options (MS Windows or Apple primarily) will be closed to you. Closed as in you can not install Linux on them. Android would be preferrable to these non-rootable, non-admin options!

    If it will run Linux, chances are it will run many small foot print distros in addition to Android. The hardware is the KEY!

    Only one question to ask, "Will the hardware run Linux?

    Linux + root access = a device you can install what you want on, without limitations.

    To make sure the hardware does, only purchase from a Linux vendor, my favorite is ZaReason, however there is System76 and probably many others. Even if the device runs Android when you purchase it, and its rootable, it will run Linux. See what hardware others are installing Linux distros on and buy that hardware.

    Small foot print Linux distros will run in either 128KB or 256KB, they will run very fast in 512KB or more of RAM. My tablet has 2GB of RAM, yea!

    Your biggest headache will be if you want the device to have cellular service, then you will have to do more research as anything you purchase from the Cellular companies is going to include proprietary chipsets on the hardware to prevent you from loading any Linux on it.

    Verify the cellular provider of your choice will let you run their software on your device. Most probably will not and Skype is not supporting Linux as well as it use to now that Microsoft bought it up. Shame, loved only paying $9 per month for my phone service that connected via WiFi. Saved a ton of money for way more than 7 years with Skype + WiFi

    Even if they say its(hardware) rootable, find someone who has installed another Linux distro on that hardware before you purchase it. One of the biggest headaches with the N800, N880 and N900 is they did not make it easy to install and update the operating system. The last thing you want to have to do is have special hardware, cables and/or software to perform an update. You should be able to update via either WiFi and/or the microSD slot.

    Most important MUST HAVE after root access is WiFi and a microSD card slot! I put a 32GB card in mine. Many websites will show you how to make a

  125. Wrong Wrong Wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    where it was basically Linux and you chold just dump/edit some BASH, or replace core utilities with hacked ones

    Replacing WHOLE UTILITIES is stupid. It takes a ton of work and is basically impossible if you don't have source.

    What ObjC lets you do, without source for anything, is to inject your own code easily into nearly any method call in an application - and thanks to ObjC verbosity, you can usually tell what method you want to overload. Then you can easily add something like a small button that activates your code into the middle of ANY application, not just the ones you have source for.

    THAT is hacking. The ability to modify and tweak any application from anyone, not just a small subset of OS applications.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  126. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then whats the problem with Android?

    Have you seen the source for android?
    Didn't think so.

  127. Load custom rom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Load a rom without the spyware in it, onto something that has all the things you want. At the moment the Note 3 has the best hardware, you just need to find a way to attach a keyboard, maybe a bluetooth logitech. Then put a stripped android or some type of arm linux. Maybe mobile Ubuntu when it is ready.

  128. LG Optimus F3Q with sliding QWERTY by elwinc · · Score: 1

    According to many websites such as this and this the LG Optimus F3Q has a sliding qwerty keyboard, a 4" 800x480 display, and Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean.

    --
    --- Often in error; never in doubt!
  129. Hardware keyboards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Swype or virtual keyboard can ever compete with the speed and accuracy of a hardware keyboard. That's been the biggest difficulty for me in upgrading from my Droid 4 (after years with Blackberry.) Although not as nerd-cool as your N900, I much prefer it over even the newest Android phones, even when they were equipped with a bluetooth keyboard. For some reason, autocorrect and the like don't seem to play well with bluetooth keyboards in Jellybean, and that's kind of a dealbreaker for anyone who is serious about texting, e-mail or other text-heavy apps. I can literally text without looking at the phone at all, using both hands, something that no virtual keyboard could enable, and I guarantee my speed is well above the fastest Swypers. If this article ends up providing comments that will help either of us find another modern phone with a decent hardware keyboard, I'm sure it will benefit many others who are looking for the same. Touchscreen keyboards are not superior, they're just cheaper. I wish us both luck in finding replacements.

  130. N900 could use the sun as a (side) backlight! by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    If you angled the screen right, the sunlight would actually reflect into and back out of the screen. Because it wasn't the angle the backlight goes from, it made it looks strange (metallic, and more physical than a backlit LCD screen normally looks, which I personally kindof like). I've rarely had a problem seeing my N9 in sunlight thanks to the polarized coating and the brightness of AMOLED, but there was something really cool about conscripting the sun into being your backlight, and I miss using my N900 because of that (and of course many other things like a hardware keyboard, but I digress).

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  131. Re:I had a N900 too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no its still locked down google shit, unless you don't use the lattest version and don't install gapps.

  132. Re:I had a N900 too... by dave562 · · Score: 1

    That is pretty sexy. When I got my Razr I was in desperate need of a phone and just bought what they had at the Verizon store. I am about to replace the battery in the Razr, but by the time that dies in another year or two, the Droid 5 should be out and be discounted... or there might even be a Droid 6 by that time.

    Thanks for the heads up!

  133. Maybe x86 phones might be a solution by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Since the x86 architecture usually comes packaged as "IBM-PCs" which are designed to run multiple operating systems, an x86 mobile phone might allow you to run Debian.

  134. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    When you say "closed and locked in", I seem to recall having downloaded a branch of the Android Open Source Project on my google sponsored, easily un-boot-lockable nexus. Not really clear how its closed and locked in.

  135. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    The point was wrong. Unlike IOS, android allows you to install packages from whatever repository--online or offline-- that you desire. Im aware of several non-google appstores, including a few enterprise ones.

    The linked post is even more laughably wrong, probably because its from 2009. To address his points:
    Does the Galaxy S have an app for “when the battery strength is less than 30, then send me an email”? NO. End of story. Sorry. Better luck next time.
    Except it does, its called tasker, and I just wrote something very similar: Battery gets under 20%, shut off bluetooth / LTE / GPS, drop screen brightness, etc. Also, if bash scripts are really your thing, its pretty darn easy to pull up a shell in cyanogenmod. You click the "terminal" app.

    Okay, fine then, does the Galaxy S have an app for “turn on the FM transmitter and speak the cellular signal strength on my car hifi using Mandarin Chinese”? NO. End of story.
    Except it does, its called tasker. Im sure there are a lot of others (llama?). I did something similar a while ago when the phone sensed magnetic field strength above 200 uTesla. I could also do it for any number of the sensors that the n900 surely lacks.

    As to the objection that some apps cost money: then write your own apk. Its not like the SDK costs anything.

  136. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    My phone is running software based on Android Open Source Project, and its not the official software.

    You want source? Here.
    http://source.android.com/

  137. Scripting on the Android? Don't make me laugh by KWTm · · Score: 1

    important that I run Vim.

    Looking at the N900 keyboard I don't think Vim would be very usable...

    Not sure what you mean. I actually and currently *do* use vim on my N900. With the keyboard.
    It's what I use to take notes.
    And also make phone calls (a keystroke mapping makes vim read the current line, identify the phone number on it, and call that number).
    And also send text messages (a keystroke mapping makes vim identify the phone number at the start of the line, and send the rest of the line to that number as a SMS).
    And also read incoming text messages -- handy when I'm driving and can't squint at the screen (a keystroke mapping makes vim call a bash script that pulls the latest text message via SQLite3, and then read it aloud using espeak).
    And a similar keystroke automatically sends a reply to whoever sent the SMS, telling him/her that I got the message, but I'm driving and can't respond right now.
    And so on, for "silence the N900 for (specified time, default 1 hour) then re-enable sound" because I'm in a meeting, etc. etc.
    In fact, I mostly control my N900 from the vim screen, and sometimes from the bash screen; much more fine-grained control than the GUI interface. The hardware keyboard is what makes it usable when driving; with an onscreen keyboard, you couldn't keep your eyes on the road. (Cue the snarky comments about "You should never use your phone when driving, because I don't, and everyone else should be like me.")

    Oh, part of the reason Vim works well on my N900 keyboard is because I've redefined it. By defaut each key has a meaning when pressed by itself, or with the Shift key, or with the Fn key. But there's a fourth combination of Shift+Fn key, which by default is the same as the Fn key -- which is completely wasted potential. So, by using the Shift+Fn key combo, I've got 30 extra characters to use, including []{}`|^~% which by default you'd have to call up the virtual keyboard to type. Maybe that's why you think the keyboard is not usable with Vim.

    *I* want to be the one in control of the phone

    There are lots of automation/scripting apps for Android, or with root you can get a real shell and install the scripting language of your choice.

    I'd be interested in a "real" shell/scripting language. Right now I have a bash script for synchronizing various text files (such as my ToDo list) between various laptops/desktops, and I just use the same script for my N900. The script also synchronizes itself, so when I improve the script on my work laptop, for example, the versions on the other laptop and the desktop and, yes, my N900 will update themselves.

    I see some really simple tools on Android -- a brief web search produces results like Tasker and AutomateIt, which are great when you want simple things like, say, changing the ringtones every Wednesday afternoon unless your phone is face-down.

    I'm looking for things more like, if a SMS comes in, then make a different "SMS arrived" sound depending on who it's from; and if it's from the wife or my parents, then read the SMS out loud unless I'm at my workplace; otherwise forward the SMS contents to my email account. Here's a N900 script for "while I'm at the office, adjust my Google Voice virtual phone settings to not forward phone calls to home". Right now I'm working on something that sends a SMS to my wife telling what freeway exit I'm closest too, and my driving speed, so I don't have to manually text her while driving to let her know when I'll be home.

    Tasker falls short in these abilities, to put it mildly; never mind that you can't reuse the scripts for the desktop/laptop. I don't mean to belittle your helpful info; it's just that smartphones like Android devices just aren't in the same league as computers-that-happen-to-have-

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  138. also: resistive screen is okay if it's multi-touch by KWTm · · Score: 1

    I hear a lot of people disparaging the resistive touch-screen of the N900, compared to the Technically Awe-Inspiring And Can't-Be-Topped (or "Apple" for short) capacitive touchscreen.

    For the record, I think people just prefer the multi-touch capability of the capacitive screen. If the resistive screen could be multi-touch, then it would be okay (and much more high-res, apparently).

    Well, Neo900 hardware is going to support dual-touch gestures like rotating and pinching, without replacing the original, resistive screen from N900! So you can have dual-touch on resistive. I think that addresses the complaint about resistive. Otherwise, what exactly is the advantage of a capacitive touchscreen?

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  139. Re:I had a N900 too... by smallfries · · Score: 1

    I think that I tried that. Going from (very fuzzy) memory there was a problem with the combo to switch. It was some like not being able to reliably press both keys at once with a single thumb so needing to use both fingers in the far left. Or something like that.

    My main motivation for the phone was a physical qwerty keyboard. But I would say now that when the keys are that small there is no benefit over a touch screen keyboard. There is an advantage to a touchscreen keyboard though: mode switches to alternate sets of glyphs are easier to use.

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  140. Re:I had a N900 too... by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    there were communicators back in the 90s too, N900 would be like the 5th gen or so

  141. Re:I had a N900 too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are referring to holding down the adjacent modifier and the shift keys, then I didn't have any problem holding down both keys at once with my thumb, and I could touch type with that keyboard, I haven't been able to touch type on any touchscreen keyboard.

  142. Re:the important thing is scriptability and contro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Binary blobs and Google's tolerance of them.

  143. Android by morphix · · Score: 1

    I got the N900 went they first came out and bloody loved it, however the lack of applications for certain things, along with a random lag in performance on my N900 led me to Android. I've had 2 N900s, one that had the MicroUSB snap off the board the other being the replacement. I still have my N900 and am thinking of using it in a project. If a device similar to the N900 (being linux, etc) came out, i would certainly jump on it.