The Upcoming Windows 8.1 Apocalypse

arglebargle_xiv (2212710) writes "As most people will have heard, Microsoft will end support for anyone who hasn't upgraded to Win8.1 Update 1 on May 8. What fewer people have heard is that large numbers of users can't install the 8.1 Update, with over a thousand messages in this one thread alone, and that's for tech geeks rather than home users who won't find out about this until their PC becomes orphaned on May 8. Check your Windows Update log, if you've got a "Failed" entry next to KB2919355 then your PC will also become orphaned after May 8."

Comments

Lamepocalypse

[Baby Duck]

As far as apocalypses go, that's one lame-sounding apocalypse.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[shadowrat]

As far as apocalypses go, that's one lame-sounding apocalypse.

how many heads were on that beast in revelations? about 8.1?

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Savage-Rabbit]

As far as apocalypses go, that's one lame-sounding apocalypse.

how many heads were on that beast in revelations? about 8.1?

Seven heads, ten horns...

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Z00L00K]

I'd rather take the Lordi version: arockalypse.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Anonymous Coward]

So stick with Windows 7 until service pack 10 comes out?

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

Especially since, in most cases people did this to themselves. Never ever buy the first version of a Windows release. And if the first version looks Vista-level problematic, approach even the first update cautiously. Everyone knows that by now.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Archangel Michael]

Revelation 8:1 When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour. And I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and seven trumpets were given to them.

nothing terrible there :)

Re:Lamepocalypse

[caseih]

Well I did have a choice, true. I could have bought an OEM version of Windows 7 that was more than twice the cost of Windows 8, and cannot ever be moved to new hardware when this computer dies or requires a major upgrade. Or I could buy Windows 8.1 direct from Microsoft for about $100. I knew it had the ridiculous metro start screen, but I knew that Classic Shell could make it close enough to Windows 7 to be workable. And it is. Also Windows 8.1 can be transferred to brand new hardware and reactivated. They loosened up the restrictions some. So faced with this, it wasn't a hard choice to put on Windows 8.1.

Mind you this situation I was in was precisely engineered by Microsoft to push me in the direction they want me to go. But surely you would do the same, no? Or would you really drop nearly $250 on an operating system?

Re:Lamepocalypse

[smash]

8 (vanilla) is still supported as I understand it. I am still getting updates, anyhow.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Anonymous Coward]

With Revelation 8:1 Update we've restored functionality of noise, so you don't have to suffer in silence for half an hour anymore. Angels have been upgraded with hovering capability to prevent exhaustion from too much standing. The first seven angels to accept the Update will also receive trombones instead of trumpets.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Anonymous Coward]

They have to do this to keep the pattern

2000 -ok
ME -bad
XP -ok
Vista -bad
7 -ok
8 -bad
8.1U1 -ok

Re:Lamepocalypse

[gtall]

Nonsense! Those trumpets were playing "Hey Jude" over, and over, and over, and....

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

I used to have a little fob on my keychain that when pressed would say "yes dear" in a cloying voice. (I'm not kidding. It finally failed and I've been looking for a replacement.) Wife would say something to me in a shrill nagging voice and then have to say "DON'T you reach for your keys!".

Re:Lamepocalypse

[operagost]

You obviously haven't been in a room with seven trumpet players.

Disclaimer: I'm a trumpet player.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Penguinisto]

But surely you would do the same, no? Or would you really drop nearly $250 on an operating system?

...err, not really. I mean, seriously - my missus looked at the same situation and decided that she really didn't need Windows for anything.

For my own new laptop, I found my own slightly costlier solution, but it works well for me. It has been working like a champ for almost year now, in spite of the abuse I regularly give it (which is, so far, longer than most laptops hold up under my not-so-tender mercies.) I keep Windows 7 around on a VMWare Fusion partition, but that's about it.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

> Or would you really drop nearly $250 on an operating system?

Oh c'mon, that's FUD and you know it. I build systems as a sideline, and I can buy locally Windows 7 Home Premium for $129 and Windows 7 64 Pro for $159. Amazon has Win 7 64 pro for $138.98. Amazon sells Windows 8 64 Pro for $129.99. For less than $10 more, you can get an operating system that actually works and results in fewer tech support calls to me. It's a good investment.

Mind you, as an early adopter of Win8, I bought it for $59 when they were trying to promote it, but after upgrading to 8.1 and seeing no relief, I finally system restored my own system back to 7, because I use my computer to do stuff, not to wrestle with operating systems. And there it sits until Microsoft gets their act together. In the meantime, the systems I build still have Windows 7.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[smash]

There will be no further service packs for Windows 7.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[leuk_he]

Together with a bunch of XPcaplipse machine the next Sqlslammer work is waiting on the next unpached vlunebility to hit the internet after May 8.

And from the viewpoint of Slashdot the world as Slashdot knows it. will end without internetnet.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[ComputersKai]

No, I'm pretty sure that was the Windows XP theme

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Anonymous Coward]

When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, he was bound by the shrink-wrapped End User License Agreement.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[FatdogHaiku]

Revelation 8:1 When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour. And I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and seven trumpets were given to them.

nothing terrible there :)

Wait till you hear them play...

Re:Lamepocalypse

[MouseTheLuckyDog]

She still your wife?

Re:Lamepocalypse

[log0n]

I know I'm in the minority on this, but Vista was far better than XP.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

We finally came to an agreement. She nags me less and in return I actually pay attention to what she's saying.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

I haven't tried Mint. It does sound interesting. I was running Fedora on a laptop for awhile, and it did ok if all you need is the basics -- mail, chat, browser, etc. The only reason I still use Windows is because I use the Adobe Creative Suite extensively, the only choices are Windows and Mac, and since I build my own systems, the only choice is Windows. The day Adobe ports to Linux will be the last day I use Windows. That will be a very happy day.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[vux984]

...err, not really. I mean, seriously - my missus looked at the same situation and decided that she really didn't need Windows for anything.

In my recent experience most "home" users who can make the switch to linux can probably switch to a tablet, and forego a computer entirely.

For my own new laptop, I found my own slightly costlier solution, but it works well for me. It has been working like a champ for almost year now, in spite of the abuse I regularly give it (which is, so far, longer than most laptops hold up under my not-so-tender mercies.) I keep Windows 7 around on a VMWare Fusion partition, but that's about it.

So your solution to the windows 7 vs windows 8 price dilemma was to buy a Mac with OSX, then bought VMWare Fusion, and then bought Windows 7 anyway?

Good job!

Re:Lamepocalypse

[TimMD909]

Quick! How many permutations are there for distributing 10 horns over 7 creatures? Bonus credit for My Little Pony Demon animated GIFs.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[dkman]

The anticipation is the worst part.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[quonsar]

I'd do what I did in 2005. Install linux and never look back.

Re: Lamepocalypse

[JustOK]

Sensible guns SHOULD be regulated. Unsensible guns should be allowed to roam free.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[JustOK]

People always talk about what's written in the Bible. All the Bibles I've seen have been printed. Haven't found any writing in any of them.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Penguinisto]

In my recent experience most "home" users who can make the switch to linux can probably switch to a tablet, and forego a computer entirely.

She has an iPad, but wanted to write docs and track cases for her local hobby group (ghost-hunting).

So your solution to the windows 7 vs windows 8 price dilemma was to buy a Mac with OSX, then bought VMWare Fusion, and then bought Windows 7 anyway?

I already had a Windows 7 install disk (well, .iso - I ripped it years ago), so no cost there really. As for the rest, my use case is highly atypical (hence the "but it works well for me." bit.)

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Darinbob]

It's sort of a trial run apocalypse, to gauge the level of public interest in a larger scale apocalypse.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[vux984]

She has an iPad, but wanted to write docs and track cases for her local hobby group (ghost-hunting).

Depending on how much writing she's doing - an ipad with a wireless keyboard would be sufficient.

Not that I'm disparaging your use of Linux -- I'm just making the point that most home users that can switch to linux can switch to a tablet instead (and for most of them its probably the smarter move -- nartually as your wife has linux expertise living in the house it works fine for you.

Basically though tablets are killing any chance for a home linux-desktop-in-the-home revolution... because a few years ago the idea was ... "If all you do is facebook, and gmail, and twitter, and youtube... hey you don't need windows you can get linux. And that's true... but if that's all you do you don't need a computer anymore either.

I already had a Windows 7 install disk (well, .iso - I ripped it years ago), so no cost there really. As for the rest, my use case is highly atypical (hence the "but it works well for me." bit.)

Windows 7 isos aren't the tricky part. Windows 7 licenses are. And unless you happened to own an otherwise unused FULL RETAIL license of Windows 7 your usage, strictly speaking, is in violation of the license agreement.

The OEM sticker on your (I'm taking a guess here) previous windows 7 laptop technically isn't transferable to a vm on your new Mac.

So your solution, to do it legit, requires a retail license purchase of windows 7, which is usually upwards of $250 for the pro version.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

As a system builder, I haven't had any problems moving XP and 7 licenses to other systems in the (rare) event of complete system failure. (As opposed to incremental upgrades, which sometimes require re-authenticating but do not require re-licensing.) You have to, you know, call and talk to a real person, but in my direct experience it can be done. This assumes you have media and a real, valid license key for each system, which is true for all the systems I build.

You might be referring to systems that are purchased with the software installed, no media and no license key. I can't answer for those.

But more to the point, it has also been my experience that systems last longer than versions of Windows. Having to regularly move a Windows license between multiple machines is not something regular users would need to do.

Re: Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

I don't play games. I have a real life.

Re: Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

...and the moment the Adobe suite is ported to Linux, I will do that. I do run Linux (CentOS for server and Ubuntu for desktop) for any application that doesn't need Photoshop, Lightroom, or Premiere. When those become available (and I know of Gimp, I use it, it's great, but it's still not quite Photoshop) I'll dump Windows without a second thought. (I mean ARE YOU KIDDING? In Windows 8 I have seen the future of Microsoft, and I want to stay as far away from that as possible.)

Because (and this is important), what OS you run doesn't matter, what work you get done with the computer is what matters. We sometimes lose sight of that.

So why am I not on a Mac? Because Macs are expensive, have their own eccentricities, and I prefer to build my own systems.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Mondor]

That's the point.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

The way I've explained it is thus -- it's not "another system". The motherboard blew out in this computer and I had to replace it. Since that particular model is not made anymore, I put in as close as I could find. The rest of the system remains the same.

I mean really, regardless of what the wording says, Microsoft is not going to make you buy another license after fixing your computer. Were that so, we wouldn't fix them, we'd just replace them with Macs.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[DQKennard]

There's sometimes highlighting, though on investigation it usually appears to be entirely random.

Re: Lamepocalypse

[Shirley Marquez]

Vista itself was fine, at least by the time service pack 1 came out. There were four problems that put people off it:

1. The new Aero UI needed a lot of GPU power. At the time, most computers didn't have it so the UI ran poorly. You could revert to the old look without window transparency, which solved the performance problem, but it wasn't obvious how to do that and the OS didn't do it automatically if you had unsuitable hardware.

1a. Under pressure from computer manufacturers, Microsoft dumbed down the requirements for the Windows Vista sticker. The result was that you could buy computers with a Vista sticker that didn't run Vista well with Aero enabled, and they SHIPPED with Aero enabled. You had to change settings before your shiny new computer would run acceptably.

2. Vista was more memory hungry than XP. Older computers usually needed a RAM upgrade to run it well, which meant an added expense. Systems with a 512MB RAM ceiling were not uncommon at the time (they had two sockets, each of which would accept a module with 256MB or less) and those systems could not be upgraded to run Vista well. Vista also needed more hard disk space, which might require a hard disk upgrade.

3. Vista brought in a major change in the way that device drivers are coded. (With good reason; the 2000/XP driver model had security problems you could drive a truck through. The new way isn't perfect but it was a substantial improvement.) Vista drivers for existing hardware were slow to appear if they were released at all, and some of the early drivers (especially graphics drivers) were buggy. That made it impossible to upgrade a lot of existing systems to Vista, and also meant that things like printers and sound cards became useless. There were quite a few examples of peripherals that were still on the market well after the release of Vista but had no drivers for it.

4. UAC. Vista was the first version of Windows to ask for permission to perform various administrative things like installing new programs. In the initial release of Vista, UAC was far too paranoid, the result being that you got so many permission prompts that everybody just clicked through them without paying attention. So you got all the pain of the permission system without any real gain in security. The paranoia level of UAC was dialed down in the service packs but the damage in public perception of Vista had already happened.

What this all added up to: people starting from a clean slate were usually happy with Vista, but people who wanted to upgrade or wanted to reuse components from an older computer often were very unhappy. Tech nerds and tech journalists tend to be in the latter category, so the people whose opinions mattered most did not care for Vista, even though typical customers buying new computers would have been happy.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[evultrole]

Were that so, we wouldn't fix them, we'd just replace them with Macs.

No you wouldn't. Have you priced any parts for macs recently? Talk about running into trouble with a particular motherboard model not made anymore, what do you do with the imacs with the GPU solder problems? Replace the board with an identical model, with the same flaw? Yeah, great.

Need a new LCD on your macbook? Oh, look, Apple decided to take a standard LG lcd and reverse 8 of the wires so that you have to buy an Apple LCD from Apple for $400 instead of the generic $60 LG model.

$250 for a new license when replacing an $80 motherboard would still be better than paying $500 for an Apple motherboard. Shit, those things frequently cost more than $330 used on ebay.

Re:Lamepocalypse

[roc97007]

I understand -- you don't fix Macs. But if it's not practical to fix PCs either, why bother with them?

Re:Lamepocalypse

[Meski]

With Revelation 8:1 Update we've restored functionality of noise, so you don't have to suffer in silence for half an hour anymore. Angels have been upgraded with hovering capability to prevent exhaustion from too much standing. The first seven angels to accept the Update will also receive trombones instead of trumpets.

It's a ceremonial wimblehorn, if you look closely.

Apocalypse?

[OverlordQ]

Doesn't this happen every time they come out with a major update?

Re:Apocalypse?

[Opportunist]

Well, for me it's not an apocalypse, it's more a phoenix rising from the ashes!

But then again, I'm in IT consulting...

Re:Apocalypse?

[roc97007]

I see where you're going. I have a side business supporting regular non-corporate users, and when Win8 was introduced, business really picked up. There's a lot of user frustration out there.

Re:Apocalypse?

[Grizzley9]

Doesn't this happen every time they come out with a major update?

My thoughts as well. I have a Eee Netbook that could never update to Win7 Service Pack 1 due to some mysterious issue that always failed no matter what I tried. Numerous hours and forums later, I just gave up since it's just a netbook and works fine for what it does and just install numerous small updates.

Re:Apocalypse?

[slashmydots]

That's the strange part! Update 1 was what, 3 weeks ago or something? They supported Vista SP1 past SP2's release for like months and months and months. I've never seen them kill something so fast ever. Even XP SP2 was supported extremely long. And this is their latest product! I have a feeling this is going to be a Vista rerun where they cut their losses and kill everything once 9 is released. For example, Vista can run IE9 but not IE10 or 11 because MS didn't want to stick any money into making it work (that's not the excuse they gave but it's the realistic one). I'm selling 100% Windows 7 at my shop because it outnumbers 8.1 and that's that. They'll be forced to support it past the current end date of 2020 so no problem there. As for 8.1, they're going to bury it so fast it'll make your head spin. So I just simply cannot sell it on new PCs.

Re:Apocalypse?

[PRMan]

Really? That's strange. My Eee Netbook upgraded just fine. Of course, I didn't use the Home version it came with and put Professional on there instead.

Microsoft make up your mind!

[bejiitas_wrath]

First you end support for XP, which is a good thing, then you end support for Windows 7 in 2020, now you are ending support for Windows 8 on May 8. Why? the bog standard Windows 8 still has newer software than Windows 7, the only thing holding it back is the retarded Modern UI interface. But this is a pretty lame apocalypse. I am perfectly happy with Windows 7 in a qemu KVM hypervisor running on a Linux laptop. This way I can run Windows in a window and use MS Office for those tasks that require it and still have access to the superior Linux command line tools. I just wish I still had my XP Pro VM. Now that was fun. Why is everything an apocalypse these days?

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[Bill, Shooter of Bul]

Its headline 2.0 compliant.

The older headline 1.0 headline of "Windows 8.1 Pre Update 1 Reduction of Update Availibility arives mid 2nd quarter" has been obsoleted and will not recieve any more updates, which required an update to a headline 2.0 compliant headline.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[rossdee]

"First you end support for XP, which is a good thing, then you end support for Windows 7 in 2020, now you are ending support for Windows 8 on May 8"

I guess MS realises that businesses are upgrading to Win 7, not 8

So when is Win 9 due out?

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[Anonymous Coward]

MS customer?
You demanded to be screwed. They did. Why are you complaining?

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[LordLimecat]

Theyre not ending support for 8.1, and you know it. Why anyone is finding it necessary to feign outrage over a headline that they know is false, is beyond me.
Oh wait its for the karma-- carry on.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[Spamalope]

Because it's the only way to get the message across to corporate fucktards that we are in the internet era and updating your software is FUCKING MANDATORY.

Not enough of you are signing up for MS Live and MS Store. That's like stealing. Some corps have even blocked MS Store. That's why we've blocked offline updates to 8.1, made it mandatory and available via MS Store only. YOU WILL AGREE TO THE MS STORE Ts & Cs! In short, you will comply with whatever poison pill we care to server or we'll throw you to the malware thieves. Oh, and have a nice day!

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[Cthefuture]

How is your video performance in KVM? I typically use VirtualBox or VMware because they have Windows video drivers that speed everything up. Last time I tried KVM the video in Windows was so slow that it was painful to use.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[mrbluejello]

...and still have access to the superior Linux command line tools.

I see you haven't learned PowerShell yet.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[Burz]

A word of caution: Most hypervisors were made primarily for the convenience of managing multiple systems on a single piece of hardware. If you want strong security around that Windows install you should think about running it in Qubes; version 2 just came out of beta.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[thunderclap]

Because getting screwed too much makes you sore.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[Darktan]

...and still have access to the superior Linux command line tools.

I see you haven't learned PowerShell yet.

Powershell is a scripting environment, not a command line. The fact that you can enter your script interactively doesn't change the many inadequacies it still sports.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[unixisc]

Not just that, the Windows 8.0 is fine for things like tablets, where people wouldn't need the classic shell. In an embedded form, it would be fine in ATMs, where XP needs the most replacing. There is no need to end support - just make the upgrade mandatory, or if needed, automatic for desktop/laptop users, and optional for everyone else. Metro is fine on tablets, great on Lumia phones

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[ZorglubZ]

Ummm... The speed increase might (just might) have something to do with the SSD upgrade. Just a thought...

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[bn557]

Win 7 works great on Qemu (and also in Xen, and Virtualbox) on an i7 820qm with 1 core dedicated to it as well as 2gb of ram set aside for it.

Re:Microsoft make up your mind!

[LordLimecat]

Updates with prerequisites have been around for years and it is not unusual for Microsoft to instruct you to perform certain updates before they continue troubleshooting a case-- and if you do not / cannot they will often note that it is now "best effort".

I can guarantee that how it will work is that you cannot install additional updates until you install this one-- just like always. Heck-- Windows XP SP3 will require no fewer than 2 updates to its update / installer components before it even lets you access the rest of Windows Update-- I know because I just performed an installation today for a test environment. This isnt new.

Linking to page 100?

[Anonymous Coward]

Page 101 has the notice that the update was re-issued with a fix and the rest of the posts are all "worked for me" posts. Problem Solved.

Re:Linking to page 100?

[sqlrob]

So you missed the ones after that saying it just changed the error they were getting?

Re:Linking to page 100?

[Overzeetop]

Maybe MS should take Apple's stance and simply require, as the first troubleshooting option, that the user re-install the machine from scratch. I've stopped bothering with Apple tech support because I don't have a day to re-install all my shit everytime a device pukes with an error.

Re:Linking to page 100?

[megalomaniacs4u]

I don't what planet you've been on, but reinstalling windows from scratch has been standard practice since win95 for anytime windows shits its panties

Re:Linking to page 100?

[vux984]

Yes, from win95 thru winxp it was standard practice anytime windows shat itself. In fact, it was standard practice for many to reinstall windows from scratch once are year just to head off it completely shitting itself.

But things have gotten better since then.

Re:Linking to page 100?

[Rufty]

But things have gotten better since then.

ROTFLMAO

Re:Linking to page 100?

[lister king of smeg]

I don't what planet you've been on, but reinstalling windows from scratch has been standard practice since win95 for anytime windows shits its panties

funny my but I find the standard practice to be nuke windows form orbit when it blows up install $linux and make a windows vm thats backed up.

Re:Linking to page 100?

[Taed]

I find the standard practice to be nuke windows form orbit

It's the only way to be sure.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[XanC]

Would you care to read the summary and try again?

Abandonware?

[martiniturbide]

Does it means we can call Windows 8.0 and Windows 8.1 (without patch) abandonware? :)

Re:Abandonware?

[Anonymous Coward]

Yes.

Re:Abandonware?

[TrancePhreak]

Windows 8.0 will still receive updates. Only Windows 8.1 pre-update will not.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[Grishnakh]

Did you even read TFS? Apparently, for a lot of people, Update 1 simply won't install for some reason. How are these people supposed to apply OS updates when the OS won't allow it?

They surely are shuffling things around

[jones_supa]

It's very interesting what kind of circus the Windows 8 major updates have become. Instead of Service Packs, you now have Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and Windows 8.1 Update 1. Now, the support carpet is suddenly pulled for anything before W8.1U1. Along the way, various platform changes in the UI front have been introduced: start button goes away, start button comes back, ability to snap Modern apps, Modern apps get a title bar, Modern apps can appear in the taskbar, start menu is coming back. Also the settings are still wonkily spread across the classic Control Panel and the Modern UI "PC settings" application, not to speak about the "charms bar" which integrates really badly with the paradigms of the normal desktop, which the user is using at the same time.

It's interesting because in the past Microsoft planned these things very carefully beforehand, and after the release of OS was very careful to not change core functionality. Maybe this is the future, then.

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[jbolden]

It's interesting because in the past Microsoft planned these things very carefully beforehand, and after the release of OS was very careful to not change core functionality. Maybe this is the future, then.

Microsoft has been quite explicit this is the future. They want an update process more like Apple's. Which means getting their customer base and their developer base used to much faster turnaround on features and issues. They are unlikely to ever get as fast as Apple, and probably don't want to but they don't want to be where DEC or IBM were when Windows Server replaced their "bug for bug compatible" systems.

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[RobertLTux]

as far as settings go there is a trick that has been around for a while now

"To activate God Mode in Windows 8, follow the steps below:

1. Go to the Desktop
2. Right-click and select New Folder.

3. Right-click on the New Folder and select Rename.
4. Change the name of the folder [just copy & paste the following string]: GodMode.{ED7BA470-8E54-465E-825C-99712043E01C}

5. Open the folder and you will find every utility Windows 8 has under the sun.

Note: With God Mode, you can easily access all the Administrative options and make any desired adjustments.

Enjoy!"

or just for "fun" https://dl.dropboxusercontent.... is pre rigged for your amusement

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[Somebody Is Using My]

Microsoft has been quite explicit this is the future. They want an update process more like Apple's.

Apple can afford to put it's customers on such a tight upgrade schedule because Apple has such a tight grip on what hardware is being used. Microsoft does not have this luxury; this is both Window's blessing and its curse. On the one hand, it allows Microsoft to dominate the desktop because users are not tied down to one hardware vendor. On the other hand, support becomes infinitely more difficult because Microsoft has to deal with all the potential conflicts caused by that huge variety of hardware. This type of support means that Microsoft has to do far more testing to make sure its OS upgrades don't inadvertently break something. This means upgrades need to come out slower, both so MS has time to do all that testing, and so its end-users can do likewise.

Microsoft is trying to have it both ways: it wants all the advantages of its immense installation base without providing the necessary support for the full range of hardware. The the end-users are rightfully crying foul at this practice. Perhaps if MS had mandated that certain controlled hardware platforms (e.g., the Surface2) would not receive support unless upgraded to W81.u1 it would be one thing, but unilaterally declaring that any version of its mainstream OS that is older than a month not receive support? It sacrifices one of Windows greatest advantages: compatibility with older software and hardware. Without that, there is increasingly little reason to use Windows. It's almost as if Microsoft is intentionally trying to push its customers towards the alternatives.

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[MrNiceguy_KS]

No mod points, but thank you for this. I've managed to tweak my work PC enough that the parts of Win8 that piss me off mostly stay out of my way, but hunting through the mess of settings makes me curse the day Balmer emerged from the primordial soup of whatever parallel evolutionary track coughed him up.

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[jbolden]

Microsoft prior to XP supported a wide range of hardware and end users were on tight OS upgrade schedules. It is only with XP that their userbase got used to not being on top of things. The Windows 8.1 preview came out in June 2013. That's plenty of time for OEMs, Microsoft and companies to have noticed and resolved issues. But that sort of aggressive testing didn't happen, unlike in the OSX world. The problem isn't the range of hardware, the problem is a customer base whose desktop groups aren't constantly prepping for the next round of upgrades.

It sacrifices one of Windows greatest advantages: compatibility with older software and hardware. Without that, there is increasingly little reason to use Windows.

They have to move their customer base off both. On the hardware side they need to move them towards new interfaces. And thus on the software side they are going to need to move them towards applications that use the new interfaces. I for one thought that Windows 8 should have been touch mandatory with Windows 7 being the last OS for non touch devices. Instead, like Vista, they ended up with a 1/2 way solution where people can use the old hardware but are often dissatisfied.

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[avandesande]

You forgot about the similarly infuriating 'R2' for server software.

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[captainClassLoader]

I've seen disorganized large systems like this before - In the one case I'm thinking of, the root cause was that upper level management had no concerns about consistency or a unified architecture, and let each app team deliver what the team wanted without much in the way of group collaboration. This smells like a similar scenario.

Re:They surely are shuffling things around

[thejynxed]

This braindead attempt at an OS was the fault of a VP who was determined to make her mark at Microsoft.

She did alright, and is now firmly in the disaster zone category of "Carly Fiorina" when it comes to computing history. This is what happens when you promote people with zero technical know-how into these oversight positions where they are allowed to make decisions like this.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[peragrin]

Damn I need to use preview when posting from my phone.

How does trash autocorrect to yeah anyways?

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[Threni]

No, it's microsoft having a different minimum spec for 8.0 and 8.1. It's a cpu issue. Version n.x software should alway run on the same hardware n.x-1 ran on.

What does Microsoft suggest people do about this? Buy new hardware? Live without the security fixes after just a year or so? Downgrade to 7?

In some countries this would possibly enter consumer protection territory. In the UK possibly the 1979 Sale Of Goods Act.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[sqlrob]

Really?

Better explain all the 0x80070002, 0x80073712, and 0x80070005 errors in my update log then.

And no, I don't think it's an OEM problem since the logs indicate a missing file in the update itself, at least for some of the errors.

Re:There are people running 8.1?

[Pieroxy]

Are there still people running windows ?

Many more than all other platform combined, at least on the desktop.

Right...

[DogDude]

I'm supposed to believe that Microsoft, the company that is still pushing out updates for a 13 year old OS, is going to somehow abandon a large portion of their customers using their most current OS? I call bullshit.

Re:Right...

[Tridus]

As they say, truth is stranger than fiction because fiction has to make sense.

It's true. If you are running 8.1, update 1 is mandatory to keep getting support: http://www.infoworld.com/t/mic...

Microsoft said it themselves here: http://blogs.technet.com/b/gla...

Originally they only gave 30 days to install it, but then they upped that to 120 because of all the compatibility and installation problems (and the few companies running Windows 8 screaming).

Bizzarely, Windows 8.0 users aren't affected in the same way. This affects 8.1 users only. As usual, Windows 7 users can ignore this ongoing fiasco and keep doing productive work.

Re:Right...

[MikeBabcock]

They're supporting an OS people use, and not one that people don't even like.

http://www.zdnet.com/just-how-...

Re:Right...

[MikeBabcock]

You seem to have missed his point entirely; Windows 7 is unaffected by this current silliness, which cuts productivity by forcing people to comply with update requirements.

Re:Right...

[Hadlock]

You have to draw a line in the sand for software update reform somewhere. Not supporting an OS that doesn't have a start button is a good place to draw a line in the sand. XP will end up as an odd duck of extended support, but this is a generally good direction they're taking.

Re:Right...

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah, and I've failed that damn update 15 times already with a File Not Found error. Nuking the Update log and all the files doesn't help. Every time, the damn thing downloads a fresh update fails the install.
So, I suppose I could wipe everything, do a factory reinstall to 8.0, update all the drivers, reinstall 8.1 and try again. How much do you want to bet that will work?

1000 replies?

[Enry]

Looking at page 100, it looks like this really affects about a dozen people and they just keep posting. Let me know when there's 1000 unique people saying there's a problem.

(and it appears that there's a fix of sorts)

Re:1000 replies?

[sandytaru]

I had no issues on either my main desktop or my laptop, nor did my husband have problems on his Surface. But they're all less than a year old. This seems to be affecting people who had slightly older hardware and either upgraded to Windows 8 or bought something that came with Win8 and was fine with it, but it was juuuuust underspecced for Windows 8.1.

Re:1000 replies?

[Anonymous Coward]

I had the failed install. The only workaround that works is to reimage the machine from a clean Windows 8.1 install. All the DSIM crap doesn't work as the process for that errors out. Don't know if it was the version I installed (Enterprise, volume license) or what, but it would not install without a clean 8.1 and then the hours of updates. Pain in the ass!

Re:1000 replies?

[nashv]

All Samsung Ativ books have problems due to a video driver upgrade that has not yet come through. You know how many of those Samsung has sold ?

Re:1000 replies?

[Enry]

I don't mean to say that it's not a serious issue, but to say that something is important because it has 1000 replies when there's only a few people posting, it's very misleading.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[bmo]

>Freshly minted account
>Only posts on this thread - no other posts on anything ever
>Friends: dingl_ (3643599) is all alone in the world.
>Blaming the user
>Blaming the OEM
>Blaming anyone but Microsoft

Oh look, a new Microsoft shill account.

--
BMO

Codename "Apocalypse"

[Anonymous Coward]

Finally, Microsoft blessed one of their products with a codename worthy of what they actually do: Windows 8.1 "Apocalypse". Truth in advertising and all that.

What do you mean I'm reading it wrong?

Maybe you should read what the issue is

[Anonymous Coward]

You may want to read up on the issue. The problem is people CAN'T update.

There is a particular update that can fail and then it blocks all the other automatic updates from happening. So without even touching the machine and automatic updates turned on you get a computer that does not get any updates. The machine won't even notify you in the store that 8.1 is available until you get that one particular update cleaned up.

This is through no fault of the end user, its completely a Microsoft issue.

Re:Maybe you should read what the issue is

[greendot]

Yeah, my PC is stuck. I've tried every trick on every page I find and nothing works. I've probably spent 30 hours on it so far. I had no problems upgrading to 8.1. I'm now to the point where I'm uninstalling software to see if it works. If tonight's series of tests do not work, I have to flash the OS... and I'm not putting 8 on it again.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[TWX]

In some countries this would possibly enter consumer protection territory. In the UK possibly the 1979 Sale Of Goods Act.

Buh-buh-buh-but the EULA!

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[bleh-of-the-huns]

Shill or not, he does has a valid point (I have not looked at the other comments).
As much as I personally hate automatic updates, as I decide when I want to update shit, for the vast unwashed masses, it is not a bad idea. Too many of my friends and family (I no longer play tech support except for direct family.. aka my wife) have had machines with years of missing patches, and they wonder why their machines are up shits creek.

I on the other hand, have a windows 8.1 slate I used for my car (runs vehicle diagnostic software, not the std odb reader crap), I cannot get update 1, I get the failure many others are getting. I cannot go back to Windows 7 because too many missing drivers, and very unreliable touchscreen experience. I have tried the windows 8 drivers on 7 with no luck. So for me, I will no longer have support (I do not need technical support, I would like security updates at least).

Good thing I do not use that for anything other than car diagnostics... At least my car won't give my computer herpes :P

As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[RogueWarrior65]

And switched to OSX or Linux.

Re:As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[jbolden]

People who don't like rapid frequent updates are unlikely to be happy with OSX. People who have trouble installing service packs because they have to do a few configuration changes to make them work are unlikely to be happy with Linux. Classic jump out of the pot into the fire.

Re:As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[RogueWarrior65]

Not so much with OSX. Might happen once a month or so if that. Linux, sure. Lots of components seems to get updated frequently. When I run Windows, it seems like every time I boot there is some sort of update. But not really my point. If Microsoft is going to brick the machine because an earlier update failed, that's bad.

Re:As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[just_another_sean]

I don't know, I installed Mint for my Mom to replace XP. Her and her husband actually seem more comfortable installing updates. They get notified on their desktop as regular users and I showed them how to switch user to an sudoer account and install the updates. When the updates are complete they just switch back to their regular account.

It's only been a couple of months and these are by no means power users with complex app requirements or the need to play games but that said, for their simple needs, everything they expect to be there is there and to them the maintenance piece is easier for them to understand. Especially since more than the OS gets updated with aptitude - no more updating Windows, and flash, and Java, and AV and, well you get the idea...

Re:As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[jbolden]

I agree the unified updates are wonderful with Linux, an area where Linux is clearly ahead of Windows and OSX. That being said, when something goes wrong with Linux updates the level of technical complexity assumed is quite high. Higher than making the few registry changes that is all that is needed to get 8.1 to update for these people.

Re:As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[MikeBabcock]

It is only on incredibly rare occasion that I've had to tweak a configuration file on Linux doing an update.

I am a little perturbed however with the new Fedora default of "reboot to update" ... (you can install a separate updater that doesn't require reboots).

Re:As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[jbolden]

They aren't bricking the computers they will continue to run fine. And if they want updates they just make a registry change.

Re:As if millions of voices cried out in terror...

[just_another_sean]

And that's where ssh comes to the rescue. :-)

They have a blanket invitation to call me for help. I wrote a little two line script to punch a whole in iptables so I can get in remotely and have a look. So far I have not needed it (/knocks wood).

One of those unable to install the 8.1 update

[LearningHard]

I'm not sure what the issue is. Both times I've tried to install it I end up with a black screen with no error message, no hard drive activity, nothing at all. Both times I've had to use my 8 disk to revert to regular Win8.

Re:One of those unable to install the 8.1 update

[L4t3r4lu5]

If you have a Pro license, downgrade to Windows 7.

If you don't have a Pro license, have you tried a Linux distro?

I don't know if you can still slipstream updates, but maybe you could try that. Clean installation with all mandatory patches.

Re:One of those unable to install the 8.1 update

[Anonymous Coward]

You can create a recovery disk with a USB. Just go into Control Panel and click on Recovery.

You can also make an installation USB.

whatever

[Anonymous Coward]

Why upgrade to Vista when you've got XP?

Why upgrade to 8 when you've got 7?

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[GlennC]

So OF COURSE that means that NOBODY ELSE is having problems ANYWHERE!

RTFA, N00b!

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[dreamchaser]

If some users can't update it sounds like an OEM issue to me, or other conflicting software/ driver or firmware problem.. Not much Microsoft can do, its an OEM problem

If you even bothered to look into it at all you'd see that your statement is false. It *is* a Microsoft issue, but then again looking at your details I wouldn't be surprised if you're just using a sockpuppet account to astroturf for MS>

VM

[grub]

I run Windows 8 in a VM on Vista. It's like a layer cake of failure.

Re:VM

[Sir_Eptishous]

Your post made my day! Hilarious.

Re:VM

[lister king of smeg]

I run Windows 8 in a VM on Vista. It's like a layer cake of failure.

If only you duel booted your Vista install with Windows ME and installed BOB on it, then you would have the ultimate windows fiasco in a box.

Re:VM

[unixisc]

Using HyperV or VirtualPC?

Re:VM

[unixisc]

How about Windows 8, w/ a Vista VM on HyperV, running VirtualPC in which you can have Windows ME running, and MS Bob on top?

I run in windows 7.

[Ralph Spoilsport]

It works. I'm eatin' popcorn. Can't wait for shit to start 'sploding.

Re:I run in windows 7.

[Bigbutt]

Maybe you should change brands of popcorn o_O

[John]

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[just_another_sean]

Oh sweet! dingl_ has a couple of anecdotes that unequivocally prove the summary and all the other posters wrong so problem solved, apocalypse averted. Thanks dingl_!

Re: There are people running 8.1?

[Anonymous Coward]

Run Ubuntu

Re:There are people running 8.1?

[cyberchondriac]

- or games. Valve is getting there but it ain't ready for prime time yet.

Re:You can't upgrade Windows 8.1 offline with OEM

[Darkinspiration]

Well there is a way to do this, http://www.extremetech.com/computing/178091-how-to-download-and-install-windows-8-1-update-1-for-free-right-now It's not really a offline installer like methode. If you apply the KB in the wrong order it could have interesting effect. But you do have a wsus server, microsoft free update solution (as in you gotta have an AD, and CAL, and a w2008 server, and SQL free...)

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[bill_mcgonigle]

Did you even read TFS? Apparently, for a lot of people, Update 1 simply won't install for some reason. How are these people supposed to apply OS updates when the OS won't allow it?

I got a brand new Windows 7 Lenovo machine for my folks' small business (to avert the imminent XPocalypse that I told them about two years ago, and eighteen months ago, and twelve months ago ... .) and I was shocked how a new-out-of-box Windows 7 machine not only needed about eight reboots to update itself, but that out of 147 updates there were like 24 that failed to apply. Reboot-re-run was needed about five times to just get through all those failed applies.

I'm more used to lazily installing a CentOS 6.0 DVD and running yum update and getting 959 updates which all apply in one smooth transaction. And that stuff was just written by a few part-time guys at Duke (of course credit to RHAT hackers for making it faster).

I wasn't surprised by XP's crummy updater, but by time Windows 7 came out they should have had this nailed with a team of pros working on it, and that this stuff is still broken in 8.1 is ridiculous. And to add insult to injury, they charge money for this junk!

Re:Just following the trend

[Anonymous Coward]

What's hilarious is that it's not actually "fashionable". That would imply a demand for the fashion, but wherever I look, I see angry users demanding less of it, not satisfied users demanding more of it. This "fashion" (the huge fonts, the scrolling, the oversized buttons, presentation over content, etc) was concocted entirely in the minds of the people making the software, not the people using it.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[PriceChild]

I installed Windows 8 from the oem disk (In MS' packaging) I received when I bought the hardware. It failed the 8.1 update with only a hex code. It took a month of googling to find the solution (and it was so obscure I've forgotten it now... either a registry change and/or modifying disk/partition flags) If a fresh install from ms's own packaging could go so badly I'm not surprised so many people are having issues. Thankfully Update 1 installed without issue.

Useful link?

[sanosuke001]

[quote]
As most people will have heard, Microsoft will end support for anyone who hasn't upgraded to Win8.1 Update 1 on May 8
[/quote]

So, how about a link to a press release from Microsoft for verification? It doesn't seem to be mentioned on their lifetime chart.(Windows Update Lifecycle)

Re:Useful link?

[sanosuke001]

As someone else posted in a sub-comment somewhere, http://blogs.technet.com/b/gla...

regular users

[roc97007]

Do regular users even know what and where the "update log" is?

I don't blame Microsoft for orphaning 8.1 early -- it's a mess and a corporate embarrassment, and the sooner they get people off it the better. My copy of 8 went back on the shelf, and it'll stay there until I'm comfortable that Microsoft understands that most of their customers don't have touch screens and they have to provide for that.

Geekly early adopters will figure out how to upgrade. Although they may be more vocal, they'll be less affected than the regular users, the people who buy computers to do stuff and not to manage operating systems, will be.

From a marketing standpoint, Microsoft really needs to get the name "windows 8" out of the public mindshare. It tastes like failure.

Re:regular users

[Funk_dat69]

Haven't you seen the MS commercials lately?
They all mention "The New Windows!", NOT "Windows 8!" Because they know that regular users have already latched on to the idea that Windows 8 is "bad". The same thing happened to Vista. Maybe both OS's deserve it, maybe not, but when you overhear Joe Schmoe computer buyer at Fry's saying "Oh, no I want the one with the good Windows", (I seriously heard this around the time Vista was cratering and again a few months back) you know you have a problem.

Re:regular users

[roc97007]

Exactly. The actual situation isn't as important as the users' perception, and currently that's pretty bad. I would submit that Windows 8 deserves every complaint, but then again, I'm a user. Someone who's.... I dunno, not a user? Works in Microsoft? Goes off bullet points instead of usage in the field? ...may have a different opinion.

hurry up and update

[Anonymous Coward]

http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/microsoft-reissues-botched-windows-81-update-kb-2919355-241891

And no, I do not believe the LIE that I must update immediatly

Awful

[blackiner]

I ordered my parents a Windows 8 laptop to replace their old xp laptop, thinking, "Well, windows 8 can't be THAT bad." It was.

The thing would not download updates. It would just say "Downloading updates..." and stall for hours at a time. I searched as much as I could online and only found barely any help. Most of it involved stopping the windows update agent service, and then deleting cached update files. But then it would just freeze again when I started it again. After a whole bunch of attempts, I noticed it was filling up the cache folder again after every time I restarted the update service, and that if I waited a bit, and then rebooted the computer, it would apply a few patches. So... that's ultimately how I ended up getting the thing all patched up. Stop update service, delete all cached patches, start update service, wait a few hours while they download in the background with no fucking mention of what is going on, reboot machine. I guess running the windows update must have been causing some sort of deadlock with the background updater or something... What a fucking mess. How in the world did they ship an OS with a non functioning update manager... And to top it all off, I couldn't just download win 8.1 separately, like how you could download the xp service packs separately. If I could have just done that... it would have been a hell of a lot simpler to get everything working. Instead they want you to download it through the microsoft store in metro... which won't show up unless, you guessed it, you already have fully updated through windows update.

On the plus side, everything works fine now that it is fully updated.

Re:Awful

[Archangel Michael]

It actually does take hours. One thing I've learned is to be patient and just let the thing sit. I just did the exact same thing as you (Mom's XP, new Laptop, Windows 8 to 8.1 Update1).

Surprisingly long time on a relatively speedy network. I can't explain it.

Re:Awful

[dargndorp]

You might want to try http://www.wsusoffline.net/ if something similar arises in the future.

Re:Awful

[phorm]

Yeah, the old updater was slightly annoying with popups etc, but the "solution" (hide it behind a bunch of menus so you almost never see update info) is even worse!

Re:Awful

[Jaysyn]

The thing would not download updates. It would just say "Downloading updates..." and stall for hours at a time. I searched as much as I could online and only found barely any help. Most of it involved stopping the windows update agent service, and then deleting cached update files. But then it would just freeze again when I started it again. After a whole bunch of attempts, I noticed it was filling up the cache folder again after every time I restarted the update service, and that if I waited a bit, and then rebooted the computer, it would apply a few patches.

I've seen several XP sytems do something very similar, but it kept processor usage around 90%-100% the whole time it was downloading. The hotfix that was supposed to fix the issue was useless, all you could really do was not use the PC while it was updating. After a certain point / update this behavior would stop. Was never sure which update fixed it because I didn't have time do one update at a time.

Re:Awful

[PPalmgren]

I just set up two laptops for family, both shipped with the original Windows 8 RTM. Fortunately this was my third go-around so I was prepared and knew what to expect.

Windows 8, when originally shipped, had a bug in the windows updater. It would not display the status of your update downloads or update installs. They also designed the updater to be a background task and not something the user actively does anymore, with the stupid design decision to artificially limit bandwith for updates to a trickle regardless of internet connection or network activity.

The result of this failure is that it takes around two hours to just download the updates for a fresh install, all without any visible indicator that the updates are going. The updater isn't frozen, its just the progress indicator is ass. It takes about ~3 hours to get a fresh machine updated and ready for windows 8.1, which takes another hour or two. I suggest using the desktop control panel (type 'contr' on the start screen to get to it) and disabling any kind of auto hibernate for this period.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[SternisheFan]

I have auto-update enabled, Win8.1 and the other updates installed flawlessly last week. Also have ClassicShell, no hint of any issues. Should I consider myself "lucky"?

Disinformation

[ormico]

Windows 8.0 will continue to be supported.
Windows 8.1 will be supported if you have Update 1 installed.
Its only Windows 8.1 that doesn't have Update 1 that is losing support.
I'm not a fan of that, but don't make it out to be more than it is. Its certainly not the end of the world.

Re:Disinformation

[ormico]

no.

Had problem with one machine

[Lawrence_Bird]

but not another. Problem machine was AMD based, I think that my have something to do with it. This seemed to finally fix it for me. I also used the standalone installer.

The Inhell machine updted no problems.

Vehicle dignostics software on Windows 8

[BcNexus]

Hey, bleh... I assume you are happy with the software you are using. I'd be interested in something like that. What's it called?

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[nine-times]

Not only is the update failing for some people, but Microsoft has also made re-installations a pain for some of the rest of us. I bought a Windows 7 machine a few years ago, and decided to go ahead and upgrade to Windows 8. So I bought Windows 8, but they only sold Windows 8 as an "upgrade" which means I can only install it from an executable from Windows 7. I can't install a clean copy directly, and at the time I bought it, Microsoft was literally not offering a "retail" version of Windows 8, instead offering only "upgrade" and an OEM version.

Since then they've introduced "8.1" and "8.1 Update 1", and the last I checked, I can't get an updated installer for those, let along an ISO for a fresh install. If I want to reinstall, I need to install Windows 7 from DVD, upgrade to Windows 8 from a downloaded installer, Upgrade to 8.1 through their app store, and then upgrade to Windows "8.1 Update 1" through Windows Update.

Must it really be so difficult? Does this BS successfully stop piracy?

good thing...

[smash]

... i'm still on windows 8. before you laugh... this box is purely for steam and 8 was easy to install. yes the UI is a pig. tried upgrading to 8.1, it just caused compatibility problems and random 100% io spikes (for 45+ minutes at a time, only fix = hard power cycle. no virus no hardware failure. have gone back to 8 and it has been fine since).

Re:good thing...

[rubycodez]

my hardcore steamer family and friends say win 7 is the only way to go since some games have problems in 8

Cool

[steeleyeball]

Won't affect me any... I guess people don't want to understand computers will have to get Macs.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[NIK282000]

Bingo, if it fails on >25% of hardware I would be happy to scream "M$" with the rest of the herd but I've seen it update fine on Lenogo, Dell, my custom build (and Surface Pro) with no problems. The hardware driver hell that comes along with some brands of laptops lately is brutally frustrating.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[jtdennis]

you obviously don't remember XP SP2 and SP3, both of which were very painful updates for many.

8.0

[Bengie]

According to some other sites, they said 8.0 users will still get updates, but if you have 8.1, you will be required to have 8.1 update 1 to continue getting updates.

I shouldn't expect Slashdot to post correct info

[Squeezer]

Microsoft moved the drop dead installation date until August.

http://www.infoworld.com/t/mic...

Corporate Windows admins roared, and Microsoft backed off, pulling the patch from the WSUS update server regimen, fixing the WSUS-specific problems, and reinstating it eight days later all while simultaneously extending the drop-dead patching deadline for WSUS (and Intune and System Center Configuration Manager) corporate customers to August.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[Threni]

I don't get confronted with an EULA when I order a laptop from Amazon. And once I've bought it I don't care what appears on the screen because I didn't have the opportunity to read that when I was making the purchase (the SALE part of Sale Of Goods Act).

Win8.1 hell

[phorm]

Never mind the "Update", I had major issues where a certain combination of software/drivers was making my system unbootable. After the reboot, win8.1 would get stuck on the splash screen forever.
One of the things I try to do is keep my C: down to just the OS and core applications (a side benefit is that it allows it to fit on a 128GB SSD). Games, data, etc go on a different drive.

After the third reinstall, I started going through a step of "install app", "reboot", "backup" and "restore if unbootable"

ntfsclone is your friend. If you pipe it through BZIP2 it'll make a decently small backup file - relative to the OS drive size - that will save your bacon
          ntfsclone --save-image -o - /dev/sda1 | bzip2 -c backup.img.bz2

Re:Win8.1 hell

[nine-times]

Is ntfsclone good enough for a real Windows imaging solution at this point?

Re:Win8.1 hell

[phorm]

I've had pretty good luck with it thus far, mind you this is same-partition restore, not between devices etc. I have also used it to clone drives with decent success, though usually I have to run through scandisk once afterwards.

steam OS

[Lehk228]

windows 7 SP1 is supported until 2020,so I don't have to care about 8 for another six years, by then I will probably be on steam OS.

give your broken computer to me.

[anwyn]

When your computer stops working on May 8, give it to me. I will install GNU/Linux on it and I won't have any problem at all.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[towermac]

"At least my car won't give my computer herpes :P"

That's only because the car doesn't have it yet. Give it time.

And I'd slip that tongue back in if I were you...

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[frank_adrian314159]

Because 't' and 'y' are often interchanged in typos, as is 'r' and 'e'. If you're on an Android phone and using Swype, the a->s->h gesture looks a lot like an a->h gesture. So, if you're light on the 't', and sloppy about hitting the 'r', trash looks a lot like yeah.

This is Microsoft Speaking

[BoRegardless]

Well, Microsoft has a computer we will sell you, preloaded with everything you need; sign here.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[marcosdumay]

Does this BS successfully stop piracy?

I'm pretty sure you'll find updated installation media for Win 8.1 if you search for torrents.

Bring 'Create Folder' back to file save dialog for

[STratoHAKster]

And while you are at it, remove the person(s) who made this user-screwing decision. I'm serious. They are not a PC user. Investigate and you'll find they own an iPad, even.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[nine-times]

Then my product key won't work, which means I have to come up with a product key generator or a crack. And at that point, why even bother buying a legit copy of Windows?

So yeah, great job stopping piracy, Microsoft!

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[PRMan]

Anybody I help with their computer I always ask them if I can turn on Automatic Updates. I figure they'll be WAY better off than if I don't.

Oh noes!

[FuzzNugget]

What will those 3 people do??

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[I_Wrote_This]

I have Windows Update set to download updates, but I need to install them.

The Win8.1 Update was optional - I had to select it to get it installed (which went OK). Odd for something so essential to future updates.

Anyone updating from 8.0 to 8.1 (now) has it pre-installed as part of the update download for the Windows Store (did that on another system 3 weeks ago).

Work and Home

[gx5000]

Windows 7 and WinXP until M$ gets their act together...
They may play on my Director's fears, so we have to apply everything M$ pushes out for our Networks, but at home and for most of my peers, we've been running XPSP2 for so long now that going to Win8 is like asking to be sat in a pool of sh*t.

Then again, I'll be nearing three decades in the biz soon so it might be a good time to start putting my Linux boxes up ahead of Windows.

And the choice is...

[no-body]

runnig
W8 unpatched
W8.1 dysfuctional

I have them both, on 2 separate disks and like neither... Maybe going back to XP-64 would not make a difference then...

Re:And the choice is...

[thejynxed]

XP-64? Egads! WHY?

Re:And the choice is...

[no-body]

XP-64? Egads! WHY?

Just for the sarcastic fun of it.

Today, I loaded the W8.1 disk again, just to try if it works any better.
- did all the upgrades
- tested (VPN to work through a VMware image) and failed hopelessly

The same test and necessity works fine under with the identical VMware image under W8 and I just don't have the mutherfucking time to sort this out to get it going under W8.1.

The W8.1 was a install/upgrade from a functional W8 and so it is after May 8:

W8 unpatched
W8.1 dysfuctional

  I really could kick somebodies butt for this!

Misinformation

[k0nane]

This situation is only going to be made worse by the misinformation being spread among lower-knowledge users. An [Big Box Office Store] employee told me that a Microsoft rep told him that Windows 8.1 (thus Update 1 beyond it) is not a free update from Windows 8. Microsoft's in-your-face "time to upgrade!" dialog may make it clear that it's free, but some users will still refuse the update for fear they'll be charged. Add more to the zombie horde...

Unclear about the impact

[kenh]

As I understand it there are 2 kinds of Windows 8 installations possible - a "retail" install or an "enterprise" install. "Retail" installs would include OEM installs, retail upgrades, and retail new install media. "Enterprise" installs would be installs from volume license media (Software Assurance, etc.). so-called "retail" installs attempt to upgrade to Win8.1, "enterprise" installs do not.

Currently an "enterprise" install must be manually upgraded to Win8.1, which involves an actual upgrade to the OS, not a simple patch/service pack install. "retail" installs will attempt to make the upgrade to Win8.1, but as noted above the success of a particular patch can prevent the install.

Am I to believe MS is dropping support for "enterprise" installs of Win8 this week? That sounds wrong - either MS will let "enterprise" users upgrade to Win8.1 via patch/service pack OR they will continue to support Win8 in "enterprise" settings.

Windows 8.x? does anyone even run that shit?

[rubycodez]

I use Win 7 in a vm at work and home for anything needing Windows. All the IT guys at work, the windows lovers and the certified microsoft engineers, agree 8 is total crap and despise it.

That's funny

[Workaphobia]

Quite interesting that Windows Vista and 7 are going the way of XP so soon.

Re:It is a bit ironic ...

[Osgeld]

linux is cute in two places, very serious work, and fucking around with your machine, tween those two extremes is where 99% of the rest of us live

Re:It is a bit ironic ...

[Rambo Tribble]

On the contrary, my clients and I have been using Linux for business and personal use in a variety of applications, for over ten years. Your impression is common, but ignorant. It is true that it takes some competence to set it up correctly, but that's actually true with Windows or OS X, as well. I've worked with each of them and Linux actually makes the most sense in how it's laid out and works. Linux, and the software which runs on it, will do the great majority of jobs as well or better than the other two, and, if it is properly configured for the use case, it is as easy to use as anything out there.

Re:Apocalypse, Really?

[tfranzese]

Tell that to Apple.

Good

[crhylove]

More Gains for LINUX.

I use Windows 7

[sproketboy]

You insensitive clod!

Go Linux,

[divali]

Well that's good news, now more and more people will see the rubbish mess that MS have got themselves into and migrate to Linux.

Re:It is a bit ironic ...

[nashv]

And then there are people like me who discover after going through 3-4 distros that their new laptops will only work properly with all features as advertised on a Windows install. To begin with Laptop power management and suspension states on Linux absolutely sucks. Period.

Re:It is a bit ironic ...

[Rambo Tribble]

No, it's the manufacturers who make laptops incompatible with open standards that suck.