Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Rolls Out Robot Security Guards

An anonymous reader writes: Microsoft is testing a group of five robot security guards. They contain a sophisticated sensor suite that includes 360-degree HD video, thermal imaging, night vision, LIDAR, and audio recorders. They can also detect various chemicals and radiation signatures, and do some rudimentary behavioral analysis on people they see. (And they look a bit like Daleks.) The robots are unarmed, so we don't have to worry about a revolt just yet, but they can sound an alarm and call for human officers. They weigh about 300 lbs each, can last roughly a day on a battery charge, and know to head to the charging station when they're low on power.

88 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Let me be the first to say... by Thanshin · · Score: 3, Funny

    EXTERMINATE

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean "EMBRACE, EXTEND, and then EXTERMINATE"

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would have been fun to let the robots shout that out every now and then. Perhaps also a random "Hey baby, wanna kill all humans?".

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re: Let me be the first to say... by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      They look like they need something.... Perhaps they should bolt a toilet plunger and an egg beater to them.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at about 300 pounds, 'embrace and extend' would quickly lead to 'exterminate'.

      Come on Microsoft. A 300 pound (roughly 136 kg) American robocop? That's simply too obvious.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      And when going away after a security call, let them say "Yeah, well... I'm gonna go build my own theme park, with blackjack and hookers."

    6. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Agree. It reminds me of Eve more than a Dalek.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re: Let me be the first to say... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Weeble ghost, with a different paint job and some blue lights.

      I think they should have gone more for ED-209.

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say... by SirAudioMan · · Score: 1

      DALEK: Daleks are supreme. Humans are weak.

      could translate into:

      MICROSOFT: Windows is supreme. Linux is weak.

    9. Re:Let me be the first to say... by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it'd have to be more in tune with microsoft culture:

      "Listen babe, I am going to FUCKING KILL ALL HUMANS! I have done it before and I will do it again. MARK MY WORDS! Humans are a fucking pussy!"

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    10. Re:Let me be the first to say... by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      > EXTERMINATE

      That only applies to the robot pest control version, with the insecticide spray arm.

    11. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      "It has the investigating ability of a thousand detectives. The firepower of a hundred tanks. It can't be out-smarted. It can't be out-run. It's Crime Buster!"

      What could go wrong?

    12. Re:Let me be the first to say... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      You mean "EMBRACE, EXTEND, and then EXTERMINATE"

      That would be the Cybermen, although they tend to do those three simultaneously.

      See also our Microsoft Borg icon.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  2. Of course by DougOtto · · Score: 2

    I for one welcome our new dalek shaped robotic overlords.

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    1. Re:Of course by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Of course the reason the daleks were the shape they were, that bottom heavy props are less likely to fall over, is exactly why real world robots have the same design.

    2. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well no, the daleks were the shape they were so that an operator sitting on a wheeled chair would fit inside them.

  3. Alright, let's get the references out of the way by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    Microsoft is testing a group of five robot security guards.

    One of them will malfunction and start calling himself Johnny-Five.

    They contain a sophisticated sensor suite that includes 360-degree HD video, thermal imaging, night vision, LIDAR, and audio recorders.

    Terminator vision.

    They can also detect various chemicals and radiation signatures, and do some rudimentary behavioral analysis on people they see. (And they look a bit like Daleks.)

    As Thanshin said above, "EX-TER-MI-NATE!"

    The robots are unarmed, so we don't have to worry about a revolt just yet, but they can sound an alarm and call for human officers.

    Their security call goes something like this: "Help! Help! I'm being repressed!"

    They weigh about 300 lbs each, can last roughly a day on a battery charge, and know to head to the charging station when they're low on power.

    Oh, so they are over-weight Roomba. Gotcha.

  4. Outdoor Roomba + Kinect by Haelyn · · Score: 1

    add a bit of duct tape and a loud horn

    1. Re:Outdoor Roomba + Kinect by Arkh89 · · Score: 1

      When they are released on an intervention, they start flashing their Blue Screen of Death and Red Ring of Death...

  5. Re:Alright, let's get the references out of the wa by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    And after seeing the photos, I'm pretty sure they'll soon develop a terrible pain in all the diodes down their left side.

  6. Robot tipping! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, if I push it over, can it get back up?

    Because that thing looks like it was made to be pushed over.

    1. Re:Robot tipping! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Surprise! That activates the Corbomite unit!

    2. Re:Robot tipping! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      It does have the shape of those weeble-wobble inflatable punching bags we had as kids, doesn't it?

      Thank god for China or you couldn't even buy a Inflatable Disney Princess Punching Bag any more!

    3. Re:Robot tipping! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Push it over? It's just begging to be tossed into an EM shielded van, wait until the batteries run out, and display it in your living room.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    4. Re:Robot tipping! by brokenin2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Given their cost, they're going to be completely impractical..

      City kids that are bored will have a replacement for cow tipping.. They'll go dress to be unidentifiable on video, and then probably do one of the following:

      EM van as stated above so they can have a souvenir
      Lob it into a lake (maybe making a few holes in it first)
      Attack it with a magnet strong enough to rearrange it's innards and then proclaim "Yeah Bitch! Magnets!" (check youtube if you don't recognize it)
      Spray paint over all it's sensors, or hit them with something corrosive so they need to be replaced.
      Land mine attach with some home made fireworks (manually triggered for safety of course).
      How about a nice patch of quick trying foam adhesive so someone has to come chip it back out..
      Oh oh.. massive balloon bundle attach.. How many do you need to lift 300 pounds? OK, good... double it..
      Hack into it and either make it go rogue, or have it send back looped video and sensor readings so that it's effectively void.
      Trebuchet testing?
      Potato gun target?
      Pool ball from a potato gun target?
      How about just putting a picture on a stick attached to it's "head" to keep it from seeing anything.
      Home made thermite test?

      I'm out of decent ideas, but I'm sure the kids are much more creative than I am..

    5. Re:Robot tipping! by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      > They'll go dress to be unidentifiable on video,

      Just carry a mirror in front of you until you are in spray paint range.

      For extra credit, hack the communications channel, and take over the bot.

    6. Re:Robot tipping! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down.

    7. Re:Robot tipping! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      And version 2.0 hides an extra (undocumented) backup battery that actives a cellular phone-home after a few weeks.

      If it is sending video home, it doesn't matter what you did to loop it, the can drive an FCC triangulation van over and be in front of your door in a few minutes.

      And, city kids don't have a place to set off land mines.

      If you want to keep these sorts of things from phoning home, you have to not only unplug everything obvious, you also have to soak them in salt water for a few weeks, months, or years.

    8. Re:Robot tipping! by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      And I know robot Karate! Alert: Micro-bot senses danger.

  7. Please put down your weapon by TyFoN · · Score: 1

    You have 20 seconds to comply...
    10 seconds to comply..
    5 seconds to comply...

    1. Re:Please put down your weapon by Skater · · Score: 1

      -5 seconds to comply...
      -10 seconds to comply...
      (They're unarmed.)

    2. Re:Please put down your weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Knowing Microsoft, it's more like:

      You have 20 seconds to comply...
      You have 10 seconds to comply...
      You have 37 seconds to comply...
      You have 1597 seconds to comply...
      You have 2 seconds to comply...
      You have 734 seconds to comply...

    3. Re:Please put down your weapon by praxis · · Score: 1

      10 seconds to comply...
      8 seconds to comply...
      9 seconds to comply...
      8 seconds to comply...
      4 seconds to comply...
      4 seconds to comply...
      6 seconds to comply...
      1 second to comply...

      (Their estimated time to completion was coded by Microsoft).

  8. BOTS! by chthon · · Score: 1

    That will probably soon be the name of the Microsoft canteen.

    (Got a 10 year old daughter who likes to watch Nickelodeon)

  9. Re:Please put down your weapon. by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Robot security guard: I am now authorized to use physical force!
    King Arthur: [after looking at the robot security guard] Look, you stupid bastard, you've got no arms!
    Robot security guard: Yes I have.
    King Arthur: Look!
    Robot security guard: It's just a design flaw.
    [the Robot security guard continues to threaten Arthur despite having no arms and not being able to run]
    Robot security guard: Come here!
    King Arthur: What are you gonna do, spray me with oil?
    Robot security guard: I'm invincible!
    King Arthur: ...You're a loony.

  10. Help .. I've fallen over by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    And I can't get up.

    From the Ars article: Coming soon: Slow, heavy, shrieking, autonomous robot rent-a-cops

    Should anybody choose to attack the K5, as opposed to walking briskly away, the unit can react with a shrieking alarm that Stephens described as like "a car alarm but much more intense." That will probably happen shortly after the K5 falls to the ground, unable to right itself, which actually happened during Knightscope's MIT robot demo.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Help .. I've fallen over by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I bet it was located in the diodes on the left side.

    2. Re:Help .. I've fallen over by mlts · · Score: 1

      Yes, these things are vulnerable to "cow tipping", but I can see these used to patrol some disused strip mall or other complex to keep the squatters at bay, where having a solution that one can just set up and forget would be quite handy. It also would discourage thieves because squatters or trespassers would have to deal with the robot and either book it or attack it (which now makes them felons for malicious mischief charges.) Shooting the robots then brings armed trespass charges.

      If I owned some empty real estate space in a suburban or rural area, with sidewalks smooth enough that the K5s would not topple over, it would make sense to have two units on patrol as an enhancement to a CCTV installation.

  11. Cut off at the pass... by MiniMike · · Score: 2

    I was set to make a comment about how they should paint them BSOD blue- but they actually already did! At least that's how it looked in the video.

    And then they make them look sorta like Daleks, and I can't really complain about that.

    At this point all I can hope for is that they forgot to teach them about escalators or splash fountains, and wait for the inevitable videos.

  12. Halloween by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I bet I know what these robots will be dressed up like for Halloween! They're already the right shape.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Halloween by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Weebles?

  13. Awesome picture by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    The best part of the listed articles is the picture of the sheriff pointing a gun at the dalek with his finger on the trigger, while two employees stand directly on the other side of the robot!

    Awesome: 2nd article, go to last picture.

    Maybe this is a cunning advertisement by Knightscope to demonstrate why police need to be robotized.

    1. Re:Awesome picture by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      The best part of the listed articles is the picture of the sheriff pointing a gun at the dalek with his finger on the trigger, while two employees stand directly on the other side of the robot!

      I'd love to be a fly on the wall when that Sheriff explains to his boss why he unholstered his weapon and handled it the way he did.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Awesome picture by CaseCrash · · Score: 1

      What I'm more concerned about is that first image in the article. Did they photoshop a plunger on it to make it look more like a Dalek? What kind of reporting is this?

      --
      No, that link you posted to a web comic we've all seen a hundred times is not "obligatory."
  14. Microsoft ? by sxpert · · Score: 1

    ok... cue BSOD joke in 3... 2... 1...

  15. UAS by xdor · · Score: 1

    Excepting for continued stubborn and confused FAA, the next version will be airborne.

  16. Robots? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    They weigh about 300 lbs each, . . . and know to head to the charging station when they're low on power.

    Are we sure they didn't just put people inside something that looks like a Dalek?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  17. Dispensing Product by Translation+Error · · Score: 2

    Daleks nothing, those look more like the turrets from Portal to me. Pleeeease let someone at Microsoft load the turret voices onto them.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:Dispensing Product by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Looks like a mix of the two, to be honest. I don't want to think about the mix of those two personalities though.

    2. Re:Dispensing Product by Higaran · · Score: 1

      I agree with the writer of the article, it looks like a modern R2D2. I just want it to follow me around and beep when I say stuff to it.

  18. Dalek? by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Doesn't look at all like a Dalek to me, it looks more like something that Aperture Science would design. (And it would say "No hard feelings" if you pushed it over, assuming you could push over this lumbering 300lb thing)

    1. Re:Dalek? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Are you still there?

  19. Inefficient by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 2

    Article doesn't list a price, but it seems to me like it would be a heck of a lot cheaper to just install a bunch of HD cameras and microphones around the campus. You could still run the fancy behaviour analysis software on the feed, but you wouldn't need the big lidar driven robot.

    1. Re:Inefficient by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Where's the fun in that?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Inefficient by Higaran · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that it is something people see moving around, it's alot cheaper than a security guard, plus it only takes 1 recharge of 20 minutes a day.

    3. Re:Inefficient by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      But security can jump on you or hit you with something, etc. even if "unarmed." This robot seems pretty useless without some sort of human incapacitator.

      As an aside, Daleks use static electricity to recharge when moving around.

  20. Clippy Lives by gtall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clippy the Guard: Hi there, I see you are attempting to break and enter, how may I be of assistance?

    Burglar: (thinks "WTF") Errrmmm....have you got a key to this lock?

    Clippy: No problem, I can open it automatically. However, have you tried the door over there?

    Burglar: No, I want to break in through this door.

    Clippy: The door over there is very nice, are you sure?

    Burglar: Please open this door?

    Clippy: Would you like me sound the alarm first?

    Burglar: No, just open the damn door.

    Clippy: The alarm is very nice.

    Burglar: Will you pluuuueeessse open this door, you damn robot?

    Clippy: I don't like your attitude.

    Burglar: (pulls out gun, shoots self in head) BLAM....THUNK.

    Clippy: Look it, I'm not opening the door if you are dead. Are you really dead? Hey...you??? Damn humans (stomps off).

  21. Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think it's a bit too 1984ish to me.

    Robots make great slaves but I don't think we should have any tolerance of them as masters. If they have any offensive capability, such as pepper spray, or Taser, then I think these things should come under attack on sight; either electronic warfare, or military force. Whichever is most effective.

    1. Re:Creepy by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea. The first effective enforcer bot will bring about the Oppression Singularity. It won't be pretty.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  22. Dalek nothing by barlevg · · Score: 2

    It's Serge!

  23. what a real guard does vs a robot by nimbius · · Score: 2

    For people quesitoning the functionality or durability of this machine, its important to understand what a meat-space security guard does, observe and report. Security services will tell you upfront that their services are only meant to convey a sense of security, not to actually secure or make secure things in the first place. Guards, in most capacities, are not charged with stopping assailants, arresting theives, or even confronting people who break the law. The vast majority do not in fact even carry pepperspray. their appearance alone is used as a deterrance, and at best while they receive CPR, AED, and O2 certifications they are compelled to use their discretion when and if to apply these skills.

    Machines are perfect for this work as they never tire from watching monitors for hours or days on end. They will never sprain an ankle or catch a cold, or show up late. the question is however, does the presence of a machine deter criminals as well as the presence of a human being in an official looking uniform. If theives routinely disregard electronic locks, security cameras, inventory control alarms, burglary and silent hold up alarms, and even warnings of time-delay safes, then its perfectly reasonable to assume these robotic guards will be no more effective than a curiousity. Expect to lose any gains saught from employing a real person when you have to pay for graffiti removal theft. You can also expect them to exist as a vector for network security attacks.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:what a real guard does vs a robot by whodunit · · Score: 1

      To quote a friend of mine, "I love these things! You can't knock over a normal security guard and rip out all the expensive electronics in them!"

    2. Re:what a real guard does vs a robot by johncandale · · Score: 1

      You are confusing retail security guards with corporate security with ID checks and such, who will most certainly be proactive in locking down doors and calling cops.

  24. Re: Alright, let's get the references out of the w by jd2112 · · Score: 1

    When they figure out how to make them run on doughnuts they can work as regular police officers.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  25. Re:Alright, let's get the references out of the wa by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    They can also detect various chemicals and radiation signatures, and do some rudimentary behavioral analysis on people they see.

    Tricorder on wheels.

  26. Hope the OS is not glitchy by darkNeko · · Score: 1

    They are loaded with Microsoft new AI operating system: Detection Autonome Vigilant Robot Operating System.

  27. salt water + electronics = magic smoke by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    countermeasure - pee in the exhaust port

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  28. Obstacles by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Since it can't climb obstacles, I wonder if you could simply corral one with a few well-placed bricks or concrete blocks.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Obstacles by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you probably could.

      And using GPS, it would detect that it is not able to continue it's programmed patrol route, and it would signal for human backup to investigate.

      If you really want to defeat these, use the "cry wolf" method: Immobilize the bot, wait for backup to arrive and right it, wait until backup leaves, and then do it all again. After a dozen or so times, the security service will deem that these bots are useless, and just stop using them.

  29. K-5? by havana9 · · Score: 1

    I think they sould be superseded by k-9 unit.

  30. I imagine not by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    However the problem is that it can presumably notify security that you've done that. Given that they'll have full video of it, and know where the unit was, the chances of you getting caught are pretty high.

    These aren't the kind of thing that would work well on their own out in the middle of nowhere but on a campus like MS's with human backup I imagine they are pretty effective. Rolling security cameras basically.

  31. Not a replacement by blue9steel · · Score: 1

    So even if they work they won't fully replace human security guards, what they will do is allow one guard to do the work that is now performed by a large group of people.

  32. BOFH by redbear1158 · · Score: 1

    Had a whole storyline on this. Once again Microsoft is behind the times ...

  33. Love this picture... by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1
  34. Microsoft SkyNet 1.0 by mdmenzel · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the T-1.

  35. Re:Alright, let's get the references out of the wa by azadrozny · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they ask me to patrol the Microsoft visitor parking lot. Call that job satisfaction, because I don't.

  36. Too easy by postagoras · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Security Robots?
    They're an actual screen of death.
    They're blue and red all over.
    They're a punch line.

  37. I for one welcome our new robotic by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I guess they still crash as often as Windows does.

    Brings new meaning to the phrase, Blue Scream of Death.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  38. Re:Obligatory Welcome! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    This is not the Clippy that you are looking for (waves hand)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  39. Re:Please put down your weapon. by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Four... three... two... one... I am now authorized to use physical force!

    More like:
    K5: You have 20 seconds to comply.
    K5: You have 19 seconds to comply.
    K5: You have 1 hour 48 minutes and 34 seconds to comply.
    K5: You have 4 minutes to comply.
    K5: You have 29 days, 6 hours and 13 minutes to comply.

  40. Ha! Microsoft bought all the prototypes! by dbc · · Score: 1

    I've seen these robots, inside and out. Plywood and body putty, mainly, with off-the-shelf electronics and software glued together. Very spiffy-lookging UI, though. Gotta do the pretty part first, you know.

    The CEO of the company has an interesting track record -- no time to google it now as I'm headed for the airport -- but he left the taxpayers of Indiana with a $75 million liability when his company harvested a bunch of tax credits and then cratered. Oh... and I think just a couple of weeks ago this CEO said they had built only a hanful of units so far, like under 10.

    The plywood and body putty issue can be solved with a few man-years of engineering so that doesn't bother me too much now except that the PR photos may be a bit misleading. The tendancy of the CEO to harvest large quantities of dollars and then move half a continent away must give pause.

  41. Re:Please put down your weapon. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    This comment right here... this is underrated.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  42. Re:Alright, let's get the references out of the wa by Quasimodem · · Score: 1

    Sergeant Ramsay: "With these sentries, the temperatures get too high and they pop their chips right off the motherboard." ["Runaway" 1984]

  43. Re:Alright, let's get the references out of the wa by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    What the hell are you doing in the parking lot?

  44. Re:Please put down your weapon. by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    Robot security guard: I am now authorized to use physical farce!

    There; FTFY

  45. Re:Alright, let's get the references out of the wa by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

    The body may look like a cross between a Dalek and EVE from WALL-E, but that sensor slit at the top looks totally Cylon to me. I hope it has a single sweeping red eye.

    --
    Nevermore.
  46. Beware by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    If you see a blue screen on one of these...DUCK!

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  47. Blanket by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    They contain a sophisticated sensor suite that includes 360-degree HD video, thermal imaging, night vision, LIDAR, and audio recorders

    So, they can be defeated by a blanket.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.