Slashdot Mirror


Study Predicts 9% Drop In Salaries of New CS Grads This Year

Jim_Austin writes: The first report on the class of 2015 from the respected National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), which conducts surveys of employers' hiring intentions throughout the year, projects a 9% drop in the salaries of new computer science bachelor's degree graduates, from $67,300 in 2014 to $61,287 this year. Reader phantomfive sends this news on a related subject: The Brookings Institute has released a report showing where the tech jobs are in the United States. Of course, San Jose comes in first, but Kansas is high up in the list. Michigan and Utah also were surprisingly high. On the other hand, if you live in Minnesota and you think there are no tech jobs, you are probably right.

170 comments

  1. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    67 was too high to begin with. Maybe this will help curb the visas.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They will keep coming until the crumbs that are left after offshoring become a minimum wage job, and even then, H-1Bs have extreme loyalty because they get deported back to the -stan that they came from after they get fired, so even at minimum wage, they will still be there.

      Honestly, as a CS major, can I recommend it for other people? Hard to say. A previous /. article yesterday had someone stating that there isn't such thing as an unemployed lawyer. I probably would agree, assuming a state other than CA or NY. To boot, law isn't something offshorable, nor can one hire legions of H-1Bs to head to the courthouse. Same with plumbers, HVAC techs, and electricians. It is a humble job, but it pays the bills and is a decent living.

      Yes, there are a few people who can make a living, but those tend to be the distinct exception, and tend to be more PM types than actual coders. The majority of the programmers I know end up drifting from job to job, getting shown the door after 2-3 years when their project gets offshored or their manager calls Tata or Infosys. I wouldn't recommend that type of life, unless one found a distinct niche like embedded programming that required expertise that couldn't be learned out of a CS 101 coursebook.

    2. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, law is very offshorable. Trial law, maybe no.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be more worried about the out-of-control universities.

    4. Re:Good by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you're in CS...out of school, take the jobs you can get, learn, get resume experience and NETWORK with people.

      Once you've paid your dues doing this awhile....incorporate yourself and contract. Especially if you can get into Federal Contracting, the money is good, you often can get on LONG term projects, the bill rate is much better, and it also helps discriminate in favor of being a US citizen, especially if there is a clearance required, no H1B's or other foreigners allowed in many of those positions.

      That is where the money is at these days.

      But, incorporate yourself so you can work corp-to-corp and they won't be scared of you having to be a W2 employee. I myself prefer the S-Corp, saves you a fortune of employment taxes (SS/Medicare) in that you don't have to pay that on all money billed, only a portion of it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re: Good by shakah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rightly or wrongly, doctors and lawyers have well-established blocks that effectivly bar outside competition.

    6. Re:Good by nobuddy · · Score: 2

      get in a job with a clearance. Any job, even if it is cleaning the urinals. Once you have that clearance you are golden. The jobs come to you.
      I never worry about my current job, my inbox is full of offers that I can step in to on a moment's notice.

    7. Re:Good by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Especially if you can get into Federal Contracting, the money is good

      This is an interesting perspective. I just interviewed someone in the DC area who is looking to get out of Federal contracting because their perception is that it is getting harder to find stable work.

      Now granted, I ended up passing on the person because their skills were not up to par and that might very well explain their challenge with finding work.

      Is there a specific skill set that you find is in demand among Federal contractors?

    8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I don't get where all this doom and gloom about software engineering career opportunities is coming from all over slashdot.

      Everyone I know is getting 85-110k straight out of school at great companies and only having to work 40-45 hours a week.

    9. Re:Good by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honestly, I don't get where all this doom and gloom about software engineering career opportunities is coming from all over slashdot.

      It is called "selection bias". The people gainfully employed are too busy to post.

    10. Re: Good by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      There are tons of unemployed and underemployed lawyers. The profession is saturated and many never work in the field.

    11. Re:Good by joocemann · · Score: 1

      ....welcome to the real world. It's not so cushy.

    12. Re:Good by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > get in a job with a clearance.

      Then you often cannot publish, nor can you discuss details of your work with the best non-military people in the field. You can also wind up ordered to commit illegal or unconstitutional acts with no safe legal or political recourse. Do remember that Edward Snowden was a contractor and reported illegal activity to his superiors, and was told to "shut up" before he want to the press with very solid proof of illegal and abusive and unconstitutional activity by parts of the federal government.

    13. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will keep coming until the crumbs that are left after offshoring become a minimum wage job, and even then, H-1Bs have extreme loyalty because they get deported back to the -stan that they came from after they get fired, so even at minimum wage, they will still be there.

      If that is the case then it is probably not a job in CS.
      If you got a CS degree and then get a job as an application programmer, why do you expect to get paid as a CS?
      If you got a CS degree and then got a job as a gardener, would you den expect to get to get paid as a CS?

      Lets face it, there isn't a very big need for people with a CS degree, what most companies need are someone to administer their server or write their reasonably trivial program. They care little if the program is a work of art or just cut'n'pasted from stackexchange.
      For the real CS positions that can't be replaced by anyone who is capable of googling for a solution there are a pretty large amount of people to choose from.
      There are probably more candidates available for each real CS position than there are wannabe actors in LA.

    14. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I don't get where all this doom and gloom about software engineering career opportunities is coming from all over slashdot.

      It is called "selection bias". The people gainfully employed are too busy to post.

      Software engineering isn't CS.
      For software engineering you will have to compete with everyone who can copy code from stackexchange. You can hope to get paid for doing more than that but most companies doesn't need better, they just need to get the software to a barely functional state. It's hard to argue that you should get a decent salary for work that anyone can do.
      As for actual CS jobs, they are few and far between. The field has been so oversaturated that people with a CS education doesn't even contemplate that they should do something else than being code monkeys.

    15. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cleaning... urinals ... Once you have that clearance you are golden... showered!

    16. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS on this advice. Do you know how hard it is for a firm to hire and spend the money to clear people? This wisdom was good in the past, but no firm will spend the money to have a CS grad cleared. Instead, they hire someone who already has a clearance (there are websites dedicated to the "have clearance, we have the jobs".)

      Trust me on this. I bounced through many interviews where I was asked if I had a clearance, if not, a CISSP, and with neither, was shown the door on the spot. The resume was not even looked at. Almost no businesses clear people these days, since there is a huge market of people with clearances out there.

    17. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CS (stem) people with fresh degrees just need to be happy making $10 - $12 an hour.

      At least these folks will be making a bit above fast food wages and businesses will be happy because business leadership is ignorant of the value of CS (stem) skills...e.g., business leadership does not understand that putting together a software application or maintaining business dependent infrastructure requires greater mental skill than flipping a hamburger on a grill.

      Shoot for $10 - $12 an hour and you'll be okay.

    18. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If graduates are tool monkey "programmers" they should be glad the drop didn't accurately reflect their value.

    19. Re:Good by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Then you often cannot publish, nor can you discuss details of your work with the best non-military people in the field. You can also wind up ordered to commit illegal or unconstitutional acts with no safe legal or political recourse. Do remember that Edward Snowden was a contractor and reported illegal activity to his superiors, and was told to "shut up" before he want to the press with very solid proof of illegal and abusive and unconstitutional activity by parts of the federal government.

      Clearance jobs aren't ONLY for super top secret stuff, just handling personnel, PeopleSoft jobs even for the Feds require clearances.

      SO, you don't have to worry about anything "illegal". It isn't just the three letter agencies that I was talking about above,in fact, those are a TINY part of the jobs I was talking bout with govt contracting.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a lawyer and developer, I must ask why lawyers are experiencing mass unemployment and underemployment, while developers with half as much schooling and no protection from H1Bs are in far higher demand?

      I went to an elite undergrad and high end law school (mid tier 1) a few years later and my experience should be instructive. Keep in mind that I did not graduate with a degree in anything remotely computer related, though I had been programming recreationally for a while.

      Bachelor's degree, not in CS: start at 35k, rapidly climb to just under 100k within 3 years.
      Go go law school, get an awful job for 30k a year, making 50k after nearly 4 years of trial experience.
      Say "fuck this" go back to programming.
      Start with a "pay cut" to 85k because I've been out of the field for nearly a decade.
      Making over 100k within 2 years of reentering field.

      This is just data. The actual experience of job hunting as a lawyer and a programmer is vastly different. As a lawyer, you have to constantly hustle to find any work, even at shitty pay. Unless you're some sort of superstar rainmaker, your employer will treat you like a turd dangling from the law firm's ass, no matter how good the work you do is. As a programmer, you're constantly being contacted by local recruiters who want to steal you from your current employer with offers of higher money. Unless you're a total fuckup, employers will generally treat you like a valued resource. It's like night and day.

      This is completely the opposite of what common sense dictates, since programmers are supposedly a dime a dozen and constantly threatened by H1Bs, while lawyers are living in a sheltered paradise of protectionism.

    21. Re: Good by vandamme · · Score: 1

      So much for the law of supply and demand.

    22. Re: Good by airdweller · · Score: 1

      "Go go law school, get an awful job for 30k a year, making 50k after nearly 4 years of trial experience."
      That's odd. A personal anecdote: I have two friends who are lawyers. Both are in their early thirties. Both passed the bar exam about 4 years ago. Both started making above 100k after 3 years. Both said all the lawyers they knew who had worked in the field for more than 5-6 years made above 150k. Contract/civil procedure/corporate law. Also, according to them, public defenders make about 80k.

      PS. Looks like it's easier for devs to make above 60k (I know a recent graduate whose first job is 60k, several mid-level devs who make about 90k and one friend with a PhD who makes 150k at Google), but it's easier for lawyers to go above 120k.

    23. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they graduated significantly before the bottom fell out in the 2007-2010 period, I could see them doing ok, but the vast majority of people 5-6 years out of law school these days are not making 150k practicing law. In fact, most of them are not even working as lawyers by that time. Most try it for a few years, realize that they're in a wasteland and go do something else.

      Regarding tales of public defenders making 80k, that is completely false. If you're heading the state public defender agency for your state or you're a federal public defender in NYC, I could see you making that kind of money, but not the rank and file public defenders that do 99 percent of the actual criminal defense work around the country. No way.

      Most surveys of lawyer salaries suffer from huge selection bias, since the only ones that stick with it are the few that were successful. The more successful they are, the more likely they are to stick with it. And in the past 5 years or so, there has been immense downward pressure in terms of workload, billable hours and billable rates.

  2. Insourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The vast majority of CS grads are coming out of state and public colleges in areas with a cheaper cost of living than your typical NY/LA/SF setup. Companies are taking advantage of this. I may make $10k less than someone on the coast, but my net income is higher.

    1. Re:Insourcing by netsavior · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In my experience, someone in Texas or North Carolina or wherever makes 10k MORE than someone on the coast. For some reason, the higher the cost of living in the area I am offered a job, the lower the salary.

    2. Re:Insourcing by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      agreed, which is why i plan on moving to charlotte in the next 2 years after i put in some time with my new company. make the same as i do in NY, but have a good 40% more buying power.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Insourcing by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      someone in Texas or North Carolina or wherever makes 10k MORE than someone on the coast

      North Carolina is on the East Coast.

    4. Re:Insourcing by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      Hasn't been the case here in South Carolina. I graduated back in 2003 and its taken 12 years to work my way up to $62k per year - I started at $27k. I do have excellent benefits though - fully employer covered healthy insurance and an actual pension plan (I retire in 17 more years).

      There just aren't a lot of companies here looking for programmers or tech talent, so you kinda take what you can get. I could make more money if I was willing to relocate to say, Atlanta, but realistically my friends and family are here. More money isn't worth moving to get it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Insourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supply and demand. A number of years ago, there were consulting/IT shops who were asking for people from Texas to go there. Well, friends interviewed and at the time were getting offered about 15% less than what they were making in Austin... but all the perks and the fact that it was a job (when finding decent work in Austin was difficult) wooed them over. The problem is that there is a relative glut of clued people in the Bay Area, so companies can pay less, which is compounded by the increased cost of living there.

      This is why Austin is getting so many Californians. The real estate is cheaper (although doubled in value in the past 10 years), salaries are higher, and even if the salaries are the same, Texas doesn't grab 7.25% of your income.

    6. Re:Insourcing by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      agreed, which is why i plan on moving to charlotte in the next 2 years after i put in some time with my new company. make the same as i do in NY, but have a good 40% more buying power.

      Yeah, but won't you miss the traffic?

    7. Re:Insourcing by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      in not in NYC, an hour or 2 away. in fact im sure ill be gaining traffic haha

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    8. Re:Insourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may make $10k less than someone on the coast, but my net income is higher.

      Yes, being a fresh grad in Bos/NYC/SF sucks. You're eating ramen in a $4K/mo basement closet with 5 smelly strangers. Your classmate got a job in Bumfuck and is now bragging about how he's living large on just half your salary.

      Your whole life isn't your early twenties. When you live in a nexus, that's where the talent is. That's where the networking is. That's where the jobs are. You can get a $20K raise in NYC just by not sucking on your first project. In Bumfuck, you might wait a decade to see that. Don't put yourself out to pasture when you are young...that door never closes.

    9. Re:Insourcing by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

      That is "onshoring" not "insourcing". "Insourcing" is when instead of hiring an external company to do some work, you hire your own employees for the task; like when a growing company gets it's own lawyer. "Outsourcing" is when you take work that you'd normally do in-house, and contract it out to a thrid party. "Offshoring" is where instead of having work done locally you send it to a cheaper country.

      --
      Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    10. Re:Insourcing by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Hasn't been the case here in South Carolina. I graduated back in 2003 and its taken 12 years to work my way up to $62k per year - I started at $27k.

      What? I started at $23k in 1987 in Virginia Beach with just a BSCS from ODU. I still live here, still with just the BSCS, and now make (about) $126k - I also have annuity and investment income, am completely debt-free and could quit/retire at will, but that's another story.

      Have worked for a small SW developer, (2) contractors at NASA Langley, The New York Times (in Norfolk) and now a large defense contractor since 2001. All here in Hampton Roads.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:Insourcing by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I live in Kansas and no it is not California pay but then again the mortgage on my very nice home is less than half what my son in San Fransisco pays for a tiny apartment.

    12. Re:Insourcing by JustinKSU · · Score: 1

      The cost of living in San Francisco is 68% more than Kansas City (source: http://www.bankrate.com/calcul...). According to Brooking's Institute report the average salary for a tech job is 96% more (source: http://www.brookings.edu/resea...). So it all depends where you fall in that spectrum. I wouldn't be surprised if some one-percenters are skewing the San Francisco average. Last time I compared salaries, it was less than a 50% increase for me to work at Apple, but I didn't compare any other companies.

    13. Re:Insourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what you're talking about, at least generally. At least in the Upstate (Greenville region), I'm looking at mid-$60k starting once I get my CS degree this year. Hell, even while interning last summer I was paid better than SC average for all industries (if it were a full years of work rather than 10 weeks).

    14. Re:Insourcing by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Texas is on the Gulf Coast.

    15. Re: Insourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. It just does it with higher sales and property taxes.

    16. Re:Insourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, I am in the area too, and unless you have a TS/SCI your opportunities are limited unless it is in education. I know it is silly to ask this of someone living in south-eastern Virginia (as nearly everyone there is or has a family member that is), but were you in the military? Did the company for which you work pay for your clearance?

  3. salary drop during a shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So all those tech company execs pressuring congress & the president that there is a shortage of developers and that they desperately need more H1Bs....

  4. Recession coming?? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The last 2 times this happened were the 1980s and early 2000s.

    Businesses always cut IT first as their is no perceived value and is easily outsourced whenever a recession starts

    1. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IT is not equivalent to CS, and new grads do not make up the bulk of the workforce.

      (If it does where you are, it means your company is burning people out, and then I pity you!)

    2. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's going to be a global recession. Russia is in ruins financially. Vast amounts of Europe (and especially Russia) will have a massive housing bubble pop when foreign currency mortgages begin to fall apart. Countries heavily invested in oil are finding their currency is crumbling. Saudi Arabia will tear itself apart financially to destroy Russia, so they'll have a recession as well.

      The US could weather it alright, but how much of the American economy is based on selling things to other countries (which will have no incentive to buy as their economies are trashed). The US travel industry will suffer greatly as foreigners simply can't afford to visit the US with the currency mismatch and the local recession.

      The scary thought is whether or not Russia will sneak back behind an iron curtain. It isn't as if there's a lot of faith in capitalism in that country to start with, and with "capitalism" (more like crony bullshit) failing them severely at this point, who knows what will happen. A soviet Russia is likely to attack the middle east.

      But at least it will be cheap to get from point A to B.

    3. Re:Recession coming?? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      The 2000's crash happened because companies let go their Y2K programmers in *droves*. It wasn't an economic problem; it was a problem of some of the biggest projects companies had tackled all coming to an end at the same time.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:Recession coming?? by Maltheus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wall Street aside, we never left the last one.

    5. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't an economic problem

      WHaaaaaa?!

      y2k was a small fraction of the dot com boom. You literally had companies that never shipped one product with valuations of millions of dollars and no expertise in house to really pull off the plan.

      Where do you think all that money came from for all of that dot com boom? It was thru loans. Loans enabled by loose fed and guaranteed loans (may/mac). The next recession was the exact same thing except with property instead of fantasy 'its internet throw money at it'. The current one is unwinding its called oil.

      It is directly an economic problem that our congress and president created hand in hand with the bankers.

      I remember it well it went from could not find a job to 10 offers a month. All in under a year and a half. *very* few were y2k stuff. Most were flash in the pan dot com bubble companies.

    6. Re:Recession coming?? by Bonzoli · · Score: 1

      Russia isn't capitalist, its a kleptocracy. Please watch PBS frontline - Putin's Way.
      Putin has no place to hide his stolen goods he might take the world down with him. He has littered the ground behind him with so many dead journalists and prosecutors. No real country would take him at this point. The FSB is holding the world hostage. The USA isn't guilt free in this but invading yet another country puts him on the boarder with NATO again. Stop him in Ukraine or in Poland, make a choice.
      Russia has never been a Capitalist society. Read ‘Red Notice’ by Bill Browder, he is morally questionable but his book has some interesting info.
      Saudi Arabia is trying to shut down fracking companies in the US so they can buy them cheap, or just put them out of business. They have a HUGE cash reserve and an average salary of $50K. Where Russia is much Lower like $10k, and Pensioners fully support anybody that keeps the vodka flowing.
      Russia is already financially broken. In a large economy it takes a while for the pain from the tail to reach the brain. Its already too late for them.
      Best the West can hope for at this point is to mitigate the failures, which Putin won't, because it would be asking him to kill himself.

    7. Re:Recession coming?? by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the recession is already starting. It is going to be another 8-12 months before it starts getting major press coverage, but companies are already cutting back on CapEx in general, and IT CapEx in particular.

      You will notice it accelerating when Merger and Acquisition (M&A) activities start picking up.

    8. Re:Recession coming?? by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      Beat me to the punch. Y2K was only one piece of the pie.

    9. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US could weather it alright

      The US engineered the situation, and that's becoming apparent now, if you're paying attention.

      Remember when Saddam wanted to use Euros for oil? He's dead now. He was stopped immediately. But his accomplices were not.

      Remember when the "housing bubble popped" in 2007 and 2008? The middle east, Russia, and the financially weaker parts of the EU all paid the price for daring to attempt an end run around the US Dollar.

      Now, the US is doing it again, and for similar-but-not-identical reasons, but the EU is just the fuse for the bomb. Russia is the ignition source. China is the payload, and it's going to go "boom".

      China has expanded wildly in the last 20 years, and they've started to get cocky. They think they can push the US and US-based companies to do things China's way. (Like requiring US tech companies to release their source code to the Chinese government so their in-house industries can steal it.) And China has growing demand for fossil fuels that they can't quickly satisfy internally. The US and their Saudi friends have undermined Russia's oil-based economy, throwing the EU into a bad situation (they're closer and somewhat reliant on that ticking time-bomb of a country) and undermining several large economies in the EU. Watch as Russia is reduced to a regional bit player, despite covering a quarter of Earth's land mass. Watch as the EU sinks into a recession that makes 2008-2010 look like a picnic. And then watch what happens to China when nobody buys their wares.

      The US inflicts deflation on any who oppose them. To them, "cyberwarfare" is a quaint little toy, a pop-gun pointed at a cannon. Sure, it causes untold suffering for the masses of serfs in those other countries (and even the serfs in the US). It's evil, but somebody's gotta be at the top of the food chain.

      Maybe global warming shouldn't be prevented. It might actually improve things.

    10. Re:Recession coming?? by solios · · Score: 2

      But don't you dare call it a Depression!

    11. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most business has gotten to the stage where if they cut it, there is not a business anymore.

    12. Re:Recession coming?? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Y2K really did cause the dot-bubble, via Greenspan. The Fed should have begun raising interest rates in 98 or so when it was clear the overall economy (tech especially) was overheated. But Greenspan was afraid that that would mean companies wouldn't be able to finance needed Y2K work, and so delayed action until early 2000. Of course, the bubble happened, and so the crash in 2000 was nasty.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wall Street aside, we never left the last one.

      You can't multiply zero wages by 300 million citizens to fill Wall streets' coffers the way you're admitting. It must be *someone*'s money doing it. If we really still have only hot air to give, and no jobs to keep cold hard cash flowing, then are the fat cats living on hopes on dreams? pixie dust magically converted into tax money?

      You can't forget just how frugal people became during the recession in fear of losing their jobs. Christmas-splurging season had virtually no 40 inch tv boxes on my sidewalks back in the heat of 2007 and 2008. Recycling day in my 150-family building shows just how much New York has left that recession, even if our minds have changed for the better. Fast forwarding to recent Decembers, you'll see 5 or 6 per week outside my Manhattan appartment building.

      That's .5k to 1 thousand dollars each. iPads didn't come to fill apple's coffers until after mid-2010. People didn't routinely have 2 to 3 contract smartphones per family at $200 down + $80 monthly for 24 months. Phones weren't replaced by 5 inch touch screens every 12 months. People don't just make that kind of investment in pleasure when recessions are still in effect.

    14. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT is not equivalent to CS

      No, but very few companies really need true CS either.
      I doubt even a percent of the people with a CS degree works with it. Most are probably just programmers.

    15. Re:Recession coming?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Countries which rely on resource extraction like Russia, Canada, Australia, Saudi Arabia, etc are going to have financial difficulties as the price of basically all resources is crashing down.

      Usually when resource prices go down industry can reduce costs and with cheaper oil people can search for profitable jobs further away from home. Because of the past housing prices a lot of people cannot move houses easily. This means unemployment is bound to go down and productivity will go up.

      The US dollar is increasing in value versus the Euro and oil is cheaper to air travel to Europe will probably increase. Airline companies should increase in value substantially.

      As for IT two things might happen. The cheaper resources enable people to consume more products and rise requirements for IT services. Or it could just happen that people will require less telecoms and Internet services as transportation costs go down. I am not quite sure of which will happen. But it is true the business seems to work in 20 year cycles and the current boom cycle should end soon. The housing market on the other hand should start picking up in the next 5 years.

    16. Re:Recession coming?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Is there any capitalist society which isn't a kleptocracy in some way?

      Or any other regime for that matter.

    17. Re:Recession coming?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      requiring US tech companies to release their source code to the Chinese government so their in-house industries can steal it

      Like the FADEC code they got from Pratt and Whitney Canada so they could clone a US designed helicopter turbine engine for their WZ-10 military attack helicopter? Yep.

      I wonder if they got the F-22 and F-35 source code as well. Then again considering how delayed the F-35 software is not even the US Government contractor has the code on hand either. :-P

      China can always redirect their economic output inwards. With low resource prices production costs are not an issue. They got nearly all the military technology specimens they needed for their military by now. They are still having trouble reverse engineering some things but in the long run it just does not matter. The next stop for them is economically co-opting Africa. It is Russia and the EU which will get shafted. The EU has incompetent leaders and Russia is still too dependent on selling resources at the same time as China is increasingly going to out compete them in the weapons market over the next 20 years. China already has better naval military hardware and electronics than Russia. China's main issues are with metallurgy and propulsion technology but even those are being solved. Military hardware exports are the only viable industry Russia has besides the resource exports.

      China is only vulnerable in that they can't feed themselves so they are vulnerable to an economic blockade. But if someone blockades them it will probably be the start of WWIII.

  5. It has begun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thanks, Zuck!

  6. I got a raise this year... by michael_rendier · · Score: 1

    1.7 percent increase, for a total of $698/month...SSI...lol

    --
    There are three kinds of people in the world. Those that can count, and those that can't.
  7. Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All those H1Bs are taking effect! No wonder the tech industry loves the prez.

  8. The world is falling apart at the seams by melchoir55 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly the shortage of tech workers has gotten so bad in the USA that the laws of supply and demand no longer hold true. Cats and dogs are living together, and pigs fly through the air with reckless abandon!

    Congress must act to raise the H1B cap even further before it's too late.

    1. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is NO shortage of tech workers in the US, stop spreading this bull shit. However, there is a *huge* shortage of tech workers willing to work for peanuts.

    2. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your either from Pakistan, India or a CTO with a budget.

    3. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by Lobo42 · · Score: 1

      Uh, I think you missed his sarcasm.

    4. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by lgw · · Score: 1

      New college hires compete on a worldwide market regardless of immigration policy. Fresh out of college there's nothing to distinguish you from a world full of people claiming they can code, and junior dev work can mostly be done anywhere. It's only after 4-5 years when you move out of that mass of people, and might have something to offer that's hard to outsource.

      Remember, outsourcing is cheaper than any sort of immigration.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also see it this way: the laws of supply and demand still hold true and economic thinkers 'think' that the current wages are too high and are an indication of the shortage of tech workers.

      What I, a layman in economic sciences, can think of is that a potential economy is held back because of this shortage. I can think of very cheap computers attached to very cheap devices, but not mass produced like smart-phones. Think of the long tail ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L... ) that has made Amazon a big success.

      Where are these long tail computer software projects? Of course, there are lots of highly specialized software projects that are only installed in a handful environments, but they cost an arm and a leg and are only available for projects that will (hopefully) enable high profits.

      What is lacking though, is a long tail in cheap internet/computer enabled devices that run complex software but have only a small market potential.

      I've worked in a business that tried to develop these kind of devices that could be used by some workers in construction, disabled people, dj's, hotels, pubs etc... Brainstorm sessions produced many ideas. The big problem was that it took a lot of development time with our limited staff to fully develop these ideas, and of course many were a bad idea. We could not develop the right amount of cheap devices that would make our turnover big enough to become profitable enough to afford the right amount of expensive tech workers. We failed winning junior computer scientist to choose our company as their first working experience. The smart ones who where probably the most capable programmers/computer scientist, understood our business model was risky, and why go for uncertainty with a moderate wage, when you can earn 20%-50% more with a big and stable company? There was a shortage of workers after all, and at that time, computer scientist/programmers could choose out of 20 different employers.

      We had to let go our dream of filling in the niches in the long tail with many cheap devices, and focused on a few niche markets with expensive devices that dramatically improved production capacity of a handful of businesses by upgrading existing 'dumb' machinery with 'smart' network aware devices. But this is of course not a good business strategy to be too dependent on a small collection of products. A failure of attracting new customers, a competitor copying and improving our ideas, etc..

      Fortunately for us, our business got the attention of a few big international companies after getting a mention of our products in an international business magazine. Enough to end up in a bid war to buy our company (this was when the dot.com bubble was growing and growing, but hadn't burst yet). The company was sold and we all got our jackpot.

      For some that jackpot, combined with their youth, ended troublesome, but that's another story. I personally live a sober live and I'm looking forward to an early retirement. I still enjoy my average wage it job in a fun environment, sometimes a little hectic, often it's just easy going. Meanwhile my jackpot is still growing and growing. Capitalism is a blessing when you are on the right side of the society. And don't believe the saying: Money does not bring happiness... it depends whether you are happy with a little money. I'm happy with a little money, I'm even saving 80% of what I earn with my average wage today after having bought a house with some of the jackpot money and at the moment I'm thus blessed with an unlimited supply of 'happiness'. My Greek/Latin secondary school curriculum has formed my views on this kind of life. In particular Epicurus ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... ) was my big example.

      And the former paragraph of my too long monologue, I think, is what bothers lots of business man, why can a simple tech worker fulfill the dream of an easy life? This is not forcing them to wor

    6. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the shortage of tech workers has gotten so bad in the USA that the laws of supply and demand no longer hold true. Cats and dogs are living together, and pigs fly through the air with reckless abandon!

      Congress must act to raise the H1B cap even further before it's too late.

      But you forget one thing about the pig.

      It's just a little airborne. It's still good! It's still good! The same cannot be said about tech jobs. I'm in the IT field and I'm doing programming for free as as a 'project'. If that were true, I would have a job doing programming.

    7. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Your either from Pakistan, India or a CTO with a budget.

      Pretty sure he's from Whooshistan.

    8. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by AnotherSeattlePrgmr · · Score: 0

      There is a shortage of devs in Seattle. And its not some trick to get h1b hiring. It's not for IT, the jobs are for real devs. It is hard to believe these stories about people who can't find jobs in some places in the us but it must be happening outside of the tech hubs because there are so many reports. In Seattle, interns are paid, pro rated, at an annual rate of 60-70k. New grads make 80k+. Move to SF, or Seattle, or Denver or Austin or one of 10 other cities.

    9. Re: The world is falling apart at the seams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go back and forth on this. Usually I agree with you. On the other hand, the last two years has found me in four different organizations where I had more expertise than the rest of the team combined (I really wish I was exaggerating). If I were to extrapolate from that, I could easily conclude that obedience, not talent or experience, has priority in many workplaces.

    10. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is they taught too many girls to code. Since they only make 70 cents on the dollar a man makes* it's bringing the average down.

      Expect a Slashdot article any day now asking, "Should male tech workers demand higher wages for women?" Replies: 547.

      * I know the wage gap thing is bullshit; this post is a joke.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  9. That should be hard to overlook. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

    If that were driving a large part of the change, it should only take a moment's work with the raw statistics to tease it out. I'd say "since they don't say that, it's probably not what's happening" -- but that would be making some possibly-unjustified assumptions about the motives of those publishing these results.

  10. Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage again by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    How we have too few CS people and we need more to do the work ?

  11. Negotiation pays dividends by clam666 · · Score: 2

    I started in IT at $22k, so screw them. Starting out of college at $67k. Highway robbery.

    But aside from getting off my lawn, a decrease is salaries is certainly a crappy situation if you made college into a tech school and thought you would be getting something near $75k after 4 years, and not you've just lost a percentage point.

    That having been said, IT jobs, from my experience, is so much about negotiation these days that $67 is almost meaningless, and kids today have access to far more knowledge to sound smart in interviews compared to pre-internet days where you couldn't parking-lot-google everything you need to know for a 5 minute primer discussion to sound knowledgeable.

    I think the smart and communicative ones are going to still command higher values, and those who luffed their way through are going to get the lower salaries.

    Where I work we pay anywhere from $45k to $110k depending on skillset, what you know, and experience. Your age isn't particularly used against you, other than you have no idea what you're worth currently, so they bone you down unless an interviewer says otherwise. We don't make you start at some Dev1 position regardless, we slot you in at higher values, even if you're knew, if you sound like you're competent, love to learn, and don't act like you know it all at 22.

    --
    I'm a satanic clam.
    1. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      i still remember when i was getting my CCNA, starting money was around 80 grand. by the time i graduated, it was cut in half

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you started the CEOs only made 40x what the schnooks made instead of 4000x like they do now.

      So I say squeeze them for all they're worth.

      And as for paying $45K - $110K, your company is cheap.

    3. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT and CS (software engineering) are not remotely the same job.

      And my own experience in my area seems to be that software engineering salaries are higher and higher every year out of school.

      I'm graduating this year and going straight into $100k a year. 2 years ago that would be almost unheard of for this city. software engineering salaries are skyrocketing on the west coast.

    4. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started in IT at $22k, so screw them. Starting out of college at $67k. Highway robbery.

      Depending on the year and location you started, that $22k could very well have been worth more than the stated $67k.

    5. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started in IT at $22k, so screw them. Starting out of college at $67k. Highway robbery

      Yes but when you started you could buy a house and a care for $50 with change to spare old timer ;-)

    6. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 1

      $100k a year with ridiculously high cost of living (I've been to San Francisco, F that) is just like making $67k, instead you give more to Uncle Sam.

  12. Glut, geography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Ordinarily, rapidly falling salaries indicate a glut, not a shortage.

    Yep.

    I wonder though if the salary drop can be explained in part by SV reaching saturation and an increasing number of positions elsewhere? I live in the rust belt in a city where things are finally starting to pick up, but the average starting salary for a person with a CS degree here might well be 50% less than in major tech hubs.

  13. College not a given for good earnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a few people in debt up to their eyeballs and will be for some time. One owes $100,000 plus in student loans! Now works in manufacturing and not the white collar kind of work. Could have got the job now with a HS diploma. I think more young people need to think hard on college and determine if what they spend in a degree is worthy of paying them back sooner rather then never. Otherwise if you don't increase your earnings over a lifetime then you have actually reduced your earnings. People should also not be surprised if another recession or worse is around the corner. We have struggled through almost 7 years of recovery and a good chance another down turn could be just months to a few years away. In fact average GDP is dreadful for a market this many years into a recovery. In reality we may be seeing a very mute recovery and in turn a quicker cycle of recessions.

    1. Re:College not a given for good earnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the general gist of your comment, anyone who has enough education behind them to be worth 100k in loans who is working a job that could have been gotten with a HS diploma either has a useless degree, circumstances that you aren't making clear here that could justify their position in life or is plainly doing it wrong. At this point I'm tempted to ask if he finished college because something here just isn't adding up.

  14. Snow Slot by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, if you live in Minnesota and you think there are no tech jobs, you are probably right.

    I would think it would be the other way around. It's harder to fill positions where the weather is lousy, meaning more openings. H1B's from warm countries don't seem happy about the cold either. (Russian H1B's may not care).

    After the Dot-Com crash when I had to accept miscellaneous contracts to survive, the "cold" cities seemed to be more flexible about candidate requirements. A good many people really hate cold weather. (I personally prefer cold over humidity, if forced to choose.)

    1. Re:Snow Slot by plover · · Score: 1

      I've lived my whole life in the Minneapolis area, and with global warming plus all the skyways connecting the downtown buildings, weather is almost a non-factor for most of the time. Snow happens here like it does in most of the country, only we're better prepared so it isn't a big deal to us. I'm tapping this on a warm bus on my way home, and while traffic is bad ...

      Oh, my. The bus just passed a wreck where the fire department and state patrol are prying some guy out of an SUV that he wrapped around a snow covered guard rail.

      Holy shit, there goes my whole argument about how great this place is to live.

      --
      John
  15. Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Kagato · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've work in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market for over a decade. I get calls from recruiters daily. Clients can never find enough experienced people. There's tons of H1Bs working in the market. It's been like that for since about 2006. It can be hard as a college grad to find a job because some bean counter is weighing paying an experienced H1B worker a similar wage as a college hire (and the H1B can't easily leave without obtaining a new sponsor.) But, as the H1B cap have tightened it's forced companies to invest in college workers like they did in the 90s.

    To summarize, MN's general unemployment rate is 3.9%, it's tech unemployment rate is a fraction of a percent. It's jobs, jobs jobs if you know computers.

    1. Re: Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by ERJ · · Score: 2

      I also found this crazy. I just lost a couple guys with 5 years experience to jobs paying $100k+ which we just could not match. Even the new college grads have been in the $70k range... The MN job market certainly doesn't seem like it has tightened up to me.

    2. Re: Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I think the author rushed to pick a place that had no jobs. The linked article shows Minneapolis/St Paul in the second to darkest dot. I searched the article for Minnesota and found no matches.

  16. Stick Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if they are stupid and do not stick together. Companies bet on someone taking the crap salary.

  17. Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pro-immigration folks have sown the wind, the rest of us shall reap the whirlwind.

  18. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by swb · · Score: 2

    This is what I was going to say. I'm told there's never enough people, although maybe this is a "never enough people for what we want to pay" problem.

  19. Focus on K-12, stop funding college by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Focus effort on K-12 education. Stop funding college education for everyone. No government support for student loans; no free college from taxpayer money. When the businesses sweat, tell them ... tell them we have workers here, and that they can certainly find our fine, educated young men chomping at the bit, ready to take low salaries and transfer time-consuming grunt work off those high-salaried professionals while their employer works with them and funds their further education.

    You know, make the people who know what jobs they need, what expansion they expect, and what it is their business does take the social responsibility of building the American workforce.

    We're so obsessed with putting high risks on the individual, demanding they speculate on the greater market, take on the risk of unemployment themselves, go years without building their career to get an education, and then hope that everyone else didn't see the same opportunity and speculate the same way and flood the market. It is the poor who can least sustain themselves when this risk fails them, and the rich who stand to benefit most from this method of operation. This arrangement benefits businesses by producing cheap, surplus, skilled labor; it benefits the middle class and upper class by providing them a stronger position in their self-driven education than the poor; and it benefits the poor least by burdening them with the consequences of dicking around in college hoping for a future career when they could be trying to get into their career now, immediately, for pay--a burden that the poor are less capable of carrying than the more affluent.

    But no, we don't see the poison; we only see the plate.

    1. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K-12 education in the United States is intended to prepare a student for entry into a college or university in the United States. That's all there is to it, and is why College will keep getting funded: that's where students actually learn (and get into massive debt, which is guaranteed lock-in income for everyone who participates in loaning).
       
      Not saying it's a good system, but that's how it is.

    2. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Negative. One Word: Outsourcing.

    3. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by vandamme · · Score: 1

      How did a Republican get in here?

    4. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Every time someone disagrees with me, I'm either called a Conservative or a Liberal, a Republican, a Democrat, a Tea Partier or a Socialist. Even on the same discussion.

      The truth is I have no friends, have no social life, have no desire for a social life, and work directly in strict facts and reality. The things I say come from facts, from analysis, from science and mathematics; if all you have is political bullshit, then I can simply point and laugh and dismiss you as a kook along with those Xenu worshippers.

    5. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Stop funding college education for everyone. No government support for student loans; no free college from taxpayer money.

      This is a horrible idea.

      When the businesses sweat, tell them ... tell them we have workers here, and that they can certainly find our fine, educated young men chomping at the bit, ready to take low salaries and transfer time-consuming grunt work off those high-salaried professionals while their employer works with them and funds their further education.

      Except they won't. We're in a more globalized economy than ever before. The tech industry here doesn't have to exist here specifically, and it's continually outsourcing whenever possible. The saving grace is that those educated here are usually more qualified and higher quality, even compared to most H1Bs.

      Making it more difficult to get the education needed to be competitive is the last thing we should be doing. Maybe instead of eliminating college subsidies we just eliminate the art history subsidies.

      putting high risks on the individual, demanding they speculate on the greater market, take on the risk of unemployment themselves, go years without building their career to get an education, and then hope that everyone else didn't see the same opportunity and speculate the same way and flood the market.

      More people qualified to create valuable, exportable products is never a bad thing (assuming it isn't an immediate influx). An industry can shrink or grow based on available talent.

      it benefits the poor least by burdening them with the consequences of dicking around in college hoping for a future career when they could be trying to get into their career now, immediately, for pay

      You mean a career at mcdonalds? This may be true if you're really "dicking around", but if you're studying hard for a quality education then yes it does benefit the poor. Education is the best way to lift anyone out of poverty.

      Businesses ultimately pay for the education of their graduates through salary. It's true that it would be nice to get businesses to invest more in education directly, but eliminating government subsidies is not the way.

    6. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      More people qualified to create valuable, exportable products is never a bad thing (assuming it isn't an immediate influx). An industry can shrink or grow based on available talent.

      Yeah, of course. As long as those morons go into debt and get compsci and engineering degrees, we can sift through 40 or 50 resumes and remind them that they're basically worth the dog shit on the bottom of our shoes, and pick the few who are willing to lick our boots. The other 74% can work at McDonalds for the same pay.

      Let's get more available talent deep in debt so we can push their salaries even further down, reduce their benefits more, and generally abuse our employees. If they get snippy, we fire them; there's like 4 times as many employable degree holders out there as there are jobs anyway, we won't have a problem filling our positions.

      You mean a career at mcdonalds? This may be true if you're really "dicking around", but if you're studying hard for a quality education then yes it does benefit the poor. Education is the best way to lift anyone out of poverty.

      4 more years without a job to get what amounts to a high school diploma--because damn near everyone has a bachelor's degree, so you're not really getting elevated--is not lifting anyone out of poverty. It's putting risks and demands on them that will impact their lives forever; it's putting risks on them that they can't afford, that they don't have the money to control. It's putting strain on them that more affluent people can better manage and survive.

      Businesses ultimately pay for the education of their graduates through salary.

      Businesses ultimately benefit from mass college education through a labor market surplus, resulting in reduced salaries. Instead of paying $150k for a programmer in 1995, they pay $63,700 for a programer in 2010.

      It's true that it would be nice to get businesses to invest more in education directly, but eliminating government subsidies is not the way.

      I'm not talking about where money comes from, but how.

      You, the individual, have to get a college degree. What degree do you get? If you look at the job market, you will see Project Managers are coming into high demand. In the coming years, entry-level salaries of $85-$100k are on the table. So you become a Project Manager, you get your degree in 2019, you get your PMP; and, in 2019, you find that the fastest-growing career field has become a glutenous mess like computer programming, and a good Project Manager makes about $65k, possibly $75k when your career is developed out, if he can get a job at all. Enjoy your unemployment.

      When a business examines its operations, it projects growth in the coming years. It sees expansion, sees that it needs more Project Managers, more Computer Programmers. It hires some new people with minimal qualifications, possibly uneducated and untrained, for cheap. It then begins training and educating them, paying for their tuition, moving grunt work from the high-dollar labor onto the lower-skilled labor. It builds a workforce, because it knows what workforce it needs; the business takes almost no risk in this, and the laborer IS BEING PAID TO BE EDUCATED and so takes no risk.

      As long as the business can just wait for the individual to make themselves into the labor force needed, the business will do nothing. It's not a matter of chipping money in; if you wanted to do that, pay for college entirely in business payroll taxes, and you would still have a sub-optimal system with fewer jobs, higher unemployment, and lower salaries, with individuals taking risks and spending four years or more incapable of entering their career field and basically wasting their time sitting in a classroom.

      You want a horrible idea? Government subsidizing the labor market to prop up

  20. I think the poster misread the graph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, if you live in Minnesota and you think there are no tech jobs, you are probably right.

    Funny, just because the dot is a little smaller and a little lighter on the map in the Minneapolis/St. Paul doesn't mean there are "no tech jobs." In fact, there is effectively negative unemployment for software developers around here.

  21. Re:Thanks Obama and Obamacare by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Gov't enforced healthcare hasn't hurt Canada's and Germany's economy (among others). And how is more people being healed harming the economy? Healing services are part of the economy also.

    If it's because Canada and Germany do "socialized"* healthcare right and we don't, then GOP should push to copy their systems rather than push to rid a healthcare plan altogether.

    We need more analysts and problem solvers in DC, not whiners. There's a glut of whiners there.

    * It's a bit of a stretch to call it "socialism". It's pretty much mandated insurance, but gives one market-based choice of providers. It was invented by Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank (yes, such things exist, or at least used to).

  22. Great by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    Less people who are unable to write a short article, use Google, and use their brain for thinking.

    But oh these drop is in the US? Too bad. So no change here.

  23. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yep, unemployment in tech in the Twin cities is lower than 2 % and its easy to find work. The original poster is probably in rural MN (or vastly overestimates his skills or employ-ability), Because skilled jobs are simply not as good or as plentiful in rural areas.

  24. Starting salaries... by foghelmut · · Score: 2

    These starting salaries look extremely inflated. Perhaps to draw more students into the programs? Or am I severely underpaid?

    1. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wondering the same thing. I make around the same after 10 years of this bullshit.

    2. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I agree... Also this, apparently
      The Labor Department reports that software developers made a median salary of $92,660 in 2013. The highest-paid 10 percent in the profession earned $143,540 in 2013, while the lowest-paid earned $55,770.

      I know this is for 2013, but I was hired in 2010 and made 55,000. 4 years later, I make 75,000. Good thing I'm leaving this place, I am apparently WAY underpaid.

    3. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was started at 57k end of 2012 when I graduated ( though I got hired full time after being a student employee making $10/hour for 3 years). With my latest raise I'm just over 60k. But I didn't graduate in CS, I just could actually talk like a sane human and ALSO be able to code ( unlike every other CS applicant they had). But I know Im the cheapest employee here, and that the average for my position in the area is 80k. But they'll pay for my masters, so it's worth it at the moment. Inflation didn't go away the past 20 years, people just decided to ignore it for some reason...

    4. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends where you live.

      8 years ago I made 80,000 out of college, now I make 260,000 (my pay doubled along the way when I moved to San Jose)

    5. Re:Starting salaries... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      The problem is where these high paying jobs are located. Making $75k is nothing when you have a 1500 sqft 2 bedroom house with no garage and it costs $250k.

      I think a better measure of income is how much a wage is relative to the local average income. I would rather make $50k/year where the average income is $25k than making $100k where the average income is $75k. Assuming it's a nice place to live, of course.

    6. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've wondered about the highest paid number from the Labor Department--does it really include areas like San Jose, Seattle, Boston and New York? I started at 110k 10 years ago and hit 250k this year in Seattle, which means either I'm at the pinnacle of my profession (scary since there wouldn't be much compensation headroom), or more likely the number being reported doesn't tell us what we think it's telling us.

    7. Re:Starting salaries... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Wondering the same thing. I make around the same after 10 years of this bullshit.

      That might or might not be so bad. It really depends on the cost of living where you live. You might be better off than someone making 100k where the cost of living is really high.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    8. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're underpaid. I'm graduating this year and have an offer from Citrix for $100k in Santa Barbara, CA

    9. Re: Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Location matters.

      I'm nearby and make 300k (8 years experience). 100k would make me move elsewhere

    10. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cowards.

    11. Re:Starting salaries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm OP. Considering that Top 1% is $380,354 (all taxpayers in US for 2014) I'd say not too much head room unless you're a special butterfly.

    12. Re:Starting salaries... by callahan2211 · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. I'd rather have $50k/year and 10 minute drive to work vs 100k/year and 50 minute drive to work. Also, don't understand why there is not more telecommuting.

      --
      "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
    13. Re:Starting salaries... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Really? The extra time you would spend commuting would be at a rate of roughly $180 an hour if you took the higher paying job. I would gladly commute for that much more money per hour of commute.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  25. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by PRMan · · Score: 1

    The summary conflates "tech jobs" with programming jobs. They aren't the same. The map does nothing to show programming jobs. Only those at "high-tech" companies.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  26. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by unimacs · · Score: 1

    If the OP based that statement on the map in the report, they either missed the big blue dot smack dab on the Minneapolis/St Paul metro area, thought it was in Wisconsin or doesn't really know which state Minnesota is.

  27. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's STEM, not sTem.

    Had to work with a CS postdoc on a science / engineering project... they were worse than useless.

  28. Re:Thanks Obama and Obamacare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That can't be said enough. I'm certainly thankful for both of those things.

  29. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by unimacs · · Score: 2

    The summary conflates "tech jobs" with programming jobs. They aren't the same. The map does nothing to show programming jobs. Only those at "high-tech" companies.

    That's true. The report is about "advanced industries". The OP really just screwed up though.

    Even that report indicates that Minneapolis/St. Paul ranks 15th in the nation in terms of advanced industry jobs. Not exactly at the top, but definitely "above average" as they say on Prairie Home Companion.

  30. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe if Congress weren't busy sucking Zuck and Gates and Larry's dicks, they'd actually call hearings as to why CS grads were earning less if there were this huge shortage of programmers. Either (a) our economic models are somehow incredibly wrong, (b) we're teaching CS students absolutely nothing useful, or (c) it was a ruse to lower labor costs to increase profits all along.

    Other than that, I'll just say I have a suspicion as to which of those three causes is most pertinent.

    --
    That is all.
  31. ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no chance that salaries are going to drop, the demand for developers is out-of-control. You can basically name your price if you're any good at all.

  32. East Coast vs. the South by tepples · · Score: 1

    North Carolina is on the East Coast.

    That's true geographically. But economically, I thought the "East Coast" started at Virginia and continued north to New England, and everything south of Virginia (Carolinas, Georgia, Florida) was "the South". I include Virginia in the East Coast because of its ties to DC and AOL's headquarters prior to 2007.

  33. How do I shot network? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you're in CS...out of school, take the jobs you can get, learn, get resume experience and NETWORK with people.

    I don't think a CCNA certification would help with the kind of networking you're thinking of. So what resources would you recommend for someone just getting started with this "networking"? Searching for networking returns a bunch of irrelevant results about computer networks, and social networking has become the cesspool known as Facebook.

    1. Re:How do I shot network? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Your search-fu is weak, tepples-san.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:How do I shot network? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Err...I guess I'm talking about the old fashioned people skills, and networking to make and keep contacts with people.

      Hell, I'm not even on Facebook or twitter, or linked in, but yet, I still have a treasure trove of folks I've worked with in the past and keep up with (phone, email) and when I need a job, I reach out to them and they usually have leads for me and recommend me.

      All this was done WAY prior to social networks you know. Maybe that's the problem, kids today don't know how to connect with and gather people connections if it doesn't involve having your face stuck in Facebook all day.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:How do I shot network? by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      You have your CCNA? Any knowledge of Cisco call centers? Seriously, if you do, my company is looking for engineers. Believe it or not, networking happens online too.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  34. Snoopy as usual, I see by tepples · · Score: 1

    However, there is a *huge* shortage of tech workers willing to work for peanuts.

    Perhaps the one thing worse than working for Peanuts Worldwide is working for Scott Adams' company.

    1. Re:Snoopy as usual, I see by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I dunno. They don't like hiring induhviduals. And who can blame them? But that means that most slashdotters wouldn't make the grade.

      OTOH, we long-time members of DNRC are shoo-ins.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  35. Meanwhile in the California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just completed a BSCS program at a state school and my median offer was 90k. Based on the anecdotal evidence of those graduating at the same time, seems like the job market is still hot here in silly valley.

    1. Re:Meanwhile in the California... by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 1

      And rent is like $3000 a month for a studio apartment

      --
      I don't want to do a sig now
  36. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

    I've work in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market for over a decade. I get calls from recruiters daily. Clients can never find enough experienced people. There's tons of H1Bs working in the market. It's been like that for since about 2006. It can be hard as a college grad to find a job because some bean counter is weighing paying an experienced H1B worker a similar wage as a college hire (and the H1B can't easily leave without obtaining a new sponsor.) But, as the H1B cap have tightened it's forced companies to invest in college workers like they did in the 90s.

    To summarize, MN's general unemployment rate is 3.9%, it's tech unemployment rate is a fraction of a percent. It's jobs, jobs jobs if you know computers.

    It's the same everywhere. Recruiters are desperate to find workers willing to fill positions at 50% of the usual salary.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  37. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Maybe if Congress weren't busy sucking Zuck and Gates and Larry's dicks, ...

    Sounds like someone hasn't read the small print in the standard Oracle support contract.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  38. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I don't believe it. HR departments quite often want an exact fit for their org's specific tool stack, regardless of how arbitrary it is, and don't want to train near matches nor wait for a learning curve.

    They expect, or at least lobby for, unrealistic instant gratification at generic prices. As a consumer I too want instant customization at a generic price. But, it's not realistic.

    Train! (or give time to self-train)
       

  39. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    It's probably a supply/demand thing, then. This study was only looking at the demand, but if there are fewer tech workers than required jobs, it's still great to be a programmer.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  40. Whiners, the lot of ya ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your company hired some incompetent H1bs person, why are you working for a company that cannot recognize the difference between competent and incompetent programmers? Heh.. which raises the next question, under the same system, how come you were hired?
    ALso, even you hire them as consultants, they have to bill the company at the prevailing wage rate. So, no, H1bs are not "cheaper". I don't buy that for a second. While it could be that some middle-man makes money off of them and they get less "in-hand pay", theres no way that they're going to bill the company at a cheaper rate. In any case, I'd rather see more H1bs come to the US and pay taxes and spend money here, than the jobs leaving the US and we get *nothing* back.

  41. I Know by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's jobs, jobs jobs if you know computers.

    Wait - this is a UNIX system! I know this!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I Know by s.petry · · Score: 1

      In some regions, sure. I live in the SF bay area and am contacted daily by recruiters. I moved here from Detroit however, where there are few jobs and no pay. I laughed at a recruiter from GM who called me and offered me 30K/yr to work as a Senior Team lead when they were pulling IT jobs back to Detroit from overseas about 3 years ago. With the shit economy in Detroit, they had plenty of people willing to work for peanuts because it's peanuts or starve.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re: I Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jurassic Park.

    3. Re:I Know by Kagato · · Score: 1

      That was a Unix system. Specifically File System Navigator for Silicon Graphics's unix system IRIX. At the time SGI was pretty popular in movie production. Albeit quite unrealistic for a tween to have a $15k unix workstation.

      But hey, at her age I had Slackware running on a machine, installed from a from a bunch of floppy disks.

    4. Re:I Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But hey, at her age I had Slackware running on a machine, installed from a from a bunch of floppy disks.

      I installed Yggdrasil from a stack of punch cards! In 3D! Now get off my lawn before I release the raptors...

  42. Unemployment rate means nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quoting a low unemployment rate as evidence of plentiful jobs is rather naïve. You could be correct thinking that that means every person wanting a job is being hired, but it is also just as possible, more likely IMHO, that all the positions are full. If MN has 4 IT (or 4000 for that matter) positions available and it is fully staffed then the unemployment rate in that sector will be zero. You should be using a more defensible stat to argue your case from.

  43. Re:Brave Cowardly World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pro-immigration folks have sown the wind, the rest of us shall reap the whirlwind.

    The only immigrants in tech jobs around here speak Hindi, not Spanish. None of the stupid political debates about illegal immigration in the US have any relationship to the tech sector.

    Take your xenophobic racist arguments to foxnews.com, where they welcome bigots of any color, as long as they're white men.

  44. Typical hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for playing the "fuck you I got mine" card. I am sure you took advantage of every loan, grant, & scholarship program available when you went to college. But hey, now that you're at the top, you need to keep competition down so you can rest on your laurels, and so here you are campaigning against the very program that helped you get to where you are today. You old bastards always do this. You'll certainly claim that experience shows you just how wrong you were back then and that we need you to save us from certain peril. Instead of fucking us over, how about you just sit around in your hot tub full of money and worry about if you really want a Rolex or a McLaren more. Your kids are probably grown up by now, but mine are still young. I do not want them eating Gov'ment Cheese forever. HA! What am I thinking anyway? The won't quit eating the cheese because I climbed my way out of poverty- that's silly. They'll quit eating it because you bastards will cancel the Food Stamp program.

    1. Re:Typical hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also typical BlueFox, where he is more than willing to run his mouth about things he takes issue with but when confronted with reality, he's nowhere to be found.

  45. "CS Grads!" everyone is missing this part... by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 1

    They are specifically talking about people right out of college with a CS degree. Any one in the field will tell you 4 years of hands on experience out weights 4 years of academic work. Once they are our of college, you now have to re-train that grad to do real world work.

  46. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the quality of the graduates institutions are putting out anything above 40K is too high. I'm running a kindergarten where I'm at.

  47. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Minnesota, and the job sites are full of jobs. I get at least twenty recruiters emailing me each day about some new position. And, they aren't the same position.

    I live in Minneapolis, and I can tell you this much - if you have half a brain, and can use something besides Windows 8, you can earn a damn fine living here in the Twin Cities. There are also a ton of non-IT jobs here as well. Better get up here before Obama gives them all away to the Somalis.

  48. bankruptcy student loans by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    bankruptcy for student loans is needed

    1. Re:bankruptcy student loans by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That's not an answer. Or rather, it's almost the answer I suggested.

      Student loans are Federally guaranteed--and now Federal. Bankruptcy for Federal loans is just a roundabout way of saying "free college, but we destroy your life in the process" (bankruptcy will liquidate your assets and shit; it's not just a straight 7-year mark on your credit). Bankruptcy for private loans just means we shift the burden off the Government and onto the banks, who then need to perform their own risk analysis; but bankruptcy can be quick, and default would likely be around 75% (same as underemployment: 74% of STEM degree holders do not have STEM jobs), so the availability of private loans would collapse due to the impact on banks's profits.

      I don't believe banks would take on the risk. It is too much, too volatile. Student loans can be mishandled through no fault of the student, and aren't very diversified: they're a bet on the market in the future, and the student may need to change direction mid-flight, or may come out the other end to a brick wall--either of which results in greatly increased risk for the lender. Other lenders making loans also increases risk: the more students you have, the more likely each individual is to default, and thus the more risk you have per debt object. This is not a good place for a business to put itself.

      No, bankruptcy for student loans is only a natural aspect of what I have said: no government intervention, no free college, no Federally-backed loans. As soon as that happens, students can get out of loans by bankruptcy; those who do will find it a terrible answer, but they will also find it a great relief. The banks will find it severely damaging to their profits, and will pull out of the Daddy Warbucks business of sending everyone's kids to college. Student loans will be small, largely for continuing education, lent to people who already have developed careers; but the vacuum of skilled labor will require fresh blood too volatile to fund, and the employers will need to take up that risk because the banks simply will refuse.

  49. Worthless CS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With everyone getting CS degrees they become more and more worthless with the increase of technology which requires less and less people. Some companies I hear are saying that people coming out of college aren't good enough and need to be beginning programming in more like elementary or middle school age.

  50. Nice try. From the 2015 Salary Survey PDF: by felix+rayman · · Score: 1

    "These results come as Salary Survey has undergone a major change in its methodology."
    ...
    "Comparisons to prior years’ Salary Surveys will also not be included and are not recommended as the methodologies are dissimilar and comparisons would not be accurate.

    link

  51. Where you are matters by AnotherSeattlePrgmr · · Score: 0

    It depends on where your job is located. Come to Seattle. There are tons of job openings and no one to fill them. Almost every evening some big company has an open house, looking for devs. My little company wants to hire 30 people, tripling our size. We cannot even get people to interview. The big companies here like Amazon, Microsoft, even the local Google office all have thousands of people. They have some h1bs but thats just because there aren't enough americans. If you suck, maybe you can't find a job, but generally you just get tried of recruiters bugging you and talking to you via linked in. And I'm almost 50 years old. If you can code, you can find a job. Yes, I have experience working at some large companies, but I only have degrees from non-famous schools.

  52. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by houghi · · Score: 1

    When I look at your A, B and C, I do not see how one excludes the other. This is not OR/OR, this is AND/AND.
    I would also add the fact that government is there for the companies and not for the people.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  53. Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Minnesota and keep an eye on the new software jobs available for my own purposes... Seems like a pretty steady stream to me. Obviously not as much as a place with much larger cities, but it's pretty sufficient for the area. Everyone I know who has a CS degree or works in tech/IT has a job right now.

  54. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 1

    Or my vote: (d) All of the above.

  55. Michigan employment by Uloi · · Score: 1

    I can tell you why there are so many jobs in tech for MI. People forget about it but, in 2008 we all got laid off, like literally 30-40%. What did the laid off people do? We left the State. Now companies are thinking dam we needed those people. I live in WA now. I can (and have) get a job offer in MI with 2 phone calls. I can't say its that easy in WA.

  56. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are overpaid and EE's work harder and are smarter anyway

  57. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an idiot if you think recruiters represent reality. Go ahead and actually follow through with them to see what they have and you'll see the same shit jobs that everyone else is talking about. If you see low unemployment, maybe it's because everyone is stuck as a wage slave. Maybe even you. Sucker.

  58. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I make over $100/hr in this market as a Java programmer (1099 corp-to-corp). Might suck if you're a help desk person, but high level folks are cleaning up. West coast wages and midwest cost of living.

  59. Every job is like this now by johncandale · · Score: 1

    There is just not lots of good work around anymore. Even fed ex drivers are independent contractors that don't get any benefits or company paid unemployment services. So everyone in those jobs are fighting to get the few better jobs, driving everything down. There is good work around, but it's so limited, even middle class work is becoming a elitist circle. Those inside the circle just don't get how many more people are outside it now. "I'm making 80k out of college, you can too" is just not true for the vast majority of people.

  60. Building people skills by tepples · · Score: 1

    Err...I guess I'm talking about the old fashioned people skills, and networking to make and keep contacts with people.

    I figured as much. It's hard for some people to build the necessary people skills from scratch, especially people who tend toward the systemizing end of the spectrum.

    I still have a treasure trove of folks I've worked with in the past and keep up with (phone, email) [...] Maybe that's the problem, kids today don't know how to connect with and gather people connections

    Perhaps you're right. I don't remember having been taught how to keep up with past contacts in high school. And that's why I don't even know where to start.