Slashdot Mirror


Study Predicts 9% Drop In Salaries of New CS Grads This Year

Jim_Austin writes: The first report on the class of 2015 from the respected National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), which conducts surveys of employers' hiring intentions throughout the year, projects a 9% drop in the salaries of new computer science bachelor's degree graduates, from $67,300 in 2014 to $61,287 this year. Reader phantomfive sends this news on a related subject: The Brookings Institute has released a report showing where the tech jobs are in the United States. Of course, San Jose comes in first, but Kansas is high up in the list. Michigan and Utah also were surprisingly high. On the other hand, if you live in Minnesota and you think there are no tech jobs, you are probably right.

99 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Insourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The vast majority of CS grads are coming out of state and public colleges in areas with a cheaper cost of living than your typical NY/LA/SF setup. Companies are taking advantage of this. I may make $10k less than someone on the coast, but my net income is higher.

    1. Re:Insourcing by netsavior · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In my experience, someone in Texas or North Carolina or wherever makes 10k MORE than someone on the coast. For some reason, the higher the cost of living in the area I am offered a job, the lower the salary.

    2. Re:Insourcing by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      agreed, which is why i plan on moving to charlotte in the next 2 years after i put in some time with my new company. make the same as i do in NY, but have a good 40% more buying power.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Insourcing by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      someone in Texas or North Carolina or wherever makes 10k MORE than someone on the coast

      North Carolina is on the East Coast.

    4. Re:Insourcing by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      Hasn't been the case here in South Carolina. I graduated back in 2003 and its taken 12 years to work my way up to $62k per year - I started at $27k. I do have excellent benefits though - fully employer covered healthy insurance and an actual pension plan (I retire in 17 more years).

      There just aren't a lot of companies here looking for programmers or tech talent, so you kinda take what you can get. I could make more money if I was willing to relocate to say, Atlanta, but realistically my friends and family are here. More money isn't worth moving to get it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Insourcing by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      agreed, which is why i plan on moving to charlotte in the next 2 years after i put in some time with my new company. make the same as i do in NY, but have a good 40% more buying power.

      Yeah, but won't you miss the traffic?

    6. Re:Insourcing by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      in not in NYC, an hour or 2 away. in fact im sure ill be gaining traffic haha

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:Insourcing by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

      That is "onshoring" not "insourcing". "Insourcing" is when instead of hiring an external company to do some work, you hire your own employees for the task; like when a growing company gets it's own lawyer. "Outsourcing" is when you take work that you'd normally do in-house, and contract it out to a thrid party. "Offshoring" is where instead of having work done locally you send it to a cheaper country.

      --
      Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    8. Re:Insourcing by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Hasn't been the case here in South Carolina. I graduated back in 2003 and its taken 12 years to work my way up to $62k per year - I started at $27k.

      What? I started at $23k in 1987 in Virginia Beach with just a BSCS from ODU. I still live here, still with just the BSCS, and now make (about) $126k - I also have annuity and investment income, am completely debt-free and could quit/retire at will, but that's another story.

      Have worked for a small SW developer, (2) contractors at NASA Langley, The New York Times (in Norfolk) and now a large defense contractor since 2001. All here in Hampton Roads.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:Insourcing by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I live in Kansas and no it is not California pay but then again the mortgage on my very nice home is less than half what my son in San Fransisco pays for a tiny apartment.

    10. Re:Insourcing by JustinKSU · · Score: 1

      The cost of living in San Francisco is 68% more than Kansas City (source: http://www.bankrate.com/calcul...). According to Brooking's Institute report the average salary for a tech job is 96% more (source: http://www.brookings.edu/resea...). So it all depends where you fall in that spectrum. I wouldn't be surprised if some one-percenters are skewing the San Francisco average. Last time I compared salaries, it was less than a 50% increase for me to work at Apple, but I didn't compare any other companies.

    11. Re:Insourcing by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Texas is on the Gulf Coast.

  2. Recession coming?? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The last 2 times this happened were the 1980s and early 2000s.

    Businesses always cut IT first as their is no perceived value and is easily outsourced whenever a recession starts

    1. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IT is not equivalent to CS, and new grads do not make up the bulk of the workforce.

      (If it does where you are, it means your company is burning people out, and then I pity you!)

    2. Re:Recession coming?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's going to be a global recession. Russia is in ruins financially. Vast amounts of Europe (and especially Russia) will have a massive housing bubble pop when foreign currency mortgages begin to fall apart. Countries heavily invested in oil are finding their currency is crumbling. Saudi Arabia will tear itself apart financially to destroy Russia, so they'll have a recession as well.

      The US could weather it alright, but how much of the American economy is based on selling things to other countries (which will have no incentive to buy as their economies are trashed). The US travel industry will suffer greatly as foreigners simply can't afford to visit the US with the currency mismatch and the local recession.

      The scary thought is whether or not Russia will sneak back behind an iron curtain. It isn't as if there's a lot of faith in capitalism in that country to start with, and with "capitalism" (more like crony bullshit) failing them severely at this point, who knows what will happen. A soviet Russia is likely to attack the middle east.

      But at least it will be cheap to get from point A to B.

    3. Re:Recession coming?? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      The 2000's crash happened because companies let go their Y2K programmers in *droves*. It wasn't an economic problem; it was a problem of some of the biggest projects companies had tackled all coming to an end at the same time.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:Recession coming?? by Maltheus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wall Street aside, we never left the last one.

    5. Re:Recession coming?? by Bonzoli · · Score: 1

      Russia isn't capitalist, its a kleptocracy. Please watch PBS frontline - Putin's Way.
      Putin has no place to hide his stolen goods he might take the world down with him. He has littered the ground behind him with so many dead journalists and prosecutors. No real country would take him at this point. The FSB is holding the world hostage. The USA isn't guilt free in this but invading yet another country puts him on the boarder with NATO again. Stop him in Ukraine or in Poland, make a choice.
      Russia has never been a Capitalist society. Read ‘Red Notice’ by Bill Browder, he is morally questionable but his book has some interesting info.
      Saudi Arabia is trying to shut down fracking companies in the US so they can buy them cheap, or just put them out of business. They have a HUGE cash reserve and an average salary of $50K. Where Russia is much Lower like $10k, and Pensioners fully support anybody that keeps the vodka flowing.
      Russia is already financially broken. In a large economy it takes a while for the pain from the tail to reach the brain. Its already too late for them.
      Best the West can hope for at this point is to mitigate the failures, which Putin won't, because it would be asking him to kill himself.

    6. Re:Recession coming?? by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the recession is already starting. It is going to be another 8-12 months before it starts getting major press coverage, but companies are already cutting back on CapEx in general, and IT CapEx in particular.

      You will notice it accelerating when Merger and Acquisition (M&A) activities start picking up.

    7. Re:Recession coming?? by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      Beat me to the punch. Y2K was only one piece of the pie.

    8. Re:Recession coming?? by solios · · Score: 2

      But don't you dare call it a Depression!

    9. Re:Recession coming?? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Y2K really did cause the dot-bubble, via Greenspan. The Fed should have begun raising interest rates in 98 or so when it was clear the overall economy (tech especially) was overheated. But Greenspan was afraid that that would mean companies wouldn't be able to finance needed Y2K work, and so delayed action until early 2000. Of course, the bubble happened, and so the crash in 2000 was nasty.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Recession coming?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Countries which rely on resource extraction like Russia, Canada, Australia, Saudi Arabia, etc are going to have financial difficulties as the price of basically all resources is crashing down.

      Usually when resource prices go down industry can reduce costs and with cheaper oil people can search for profitable jobs further away from home. Because of the past housing prices a lot of people cannot move houses easily. This means unemployment is bound to go down and productivity will go up.

      The US dollar is increasing in value versus the Euro and oil is cheaper to air travel to Europe will probably increase. Airline companies should increase in value substantially.

      As for IT two things might happen. The cheaper resources enable people to consume more products and rise requirements for IT services. Or it could just happen that people will require less telecoms and Internet services as transportation costs go down. I am not quite sure of which will happen. But it is true the business seems to work in 20 year cycles and the current boom cycle should end soon. The housing market on the other hand should start picking up in the next 5 years.

    11. Re:Recession coming?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Is there any capitalist society which isn't a kleptocracy in some way?

      Or any other regime for that matter.

    12. Re:Recession coming?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      requiring US tech companies to release their source code to the Chinese government so their in-house industries can steal it

      Like the FADEC code they got from Pratt and Whitney Canada so they could clone a US designed helicopter turbine engine for their WZ-10 military attack helicopter? Yep.

      I wonder if they got the F-22 and F-35 source code as well. Then again considering how delayed the F-35 software is not even the US Government contractor has the code on hand either. :-P

      China can always redirect their economic output inwards. With low resource prices production costs are not an issue. They got nearly all the military technology specimens they needed for their military by now. They are still having trouble reverse engineering some things but in the long run it just does not matter. The next stop for them is economically co-opting Africa. It is Russia and the EU which will get shafted. The EU has incompetent leaders and Russia is still too dependent on selling resources at the same time as China is increasingly going to out compete them in the weapons market over the next 20 years. China already has better naval military hardware and electronics than Russia. China's main issues are with metallurgy and propulsion technology but even those are being solved. Military hardware exports are the only viable industry Russia has besides the resource exports.

      China is only vulnerable in that they can't feed themselves so they are vulnerable to an economic blockade. But if someone blockades them it will probably be the start of WWIII.

  3. It has begun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thanks, Zuck!

  4. I got a raise this year... by michael_rendier · · Score: 1

    1.7 percent increase, for a total of $698/month...SSI...lol

    --
    There are three kinds of people in the world. Those that can count, and those that can't.
  5. Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All those H1Bs are taking effect! No wonder the tech industry loves the prez.

  6. The world is falling apart at the seams by melchoir55 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly the shortage of tech workers has gotten so bad in the USA that the laws of supply and demand no longer hold true. Cats and dogs are living together, and pigs fly through the air with reckless abandon!

    Congress must act to raise the H1B cap even further before it's too late.

    1. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is NO shortage of tech workers in the US, stop spreading this bull shit. However, there is a *huge* shortage of tech workers willing to work for peanuts.

    2. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by Lobo42 · · Score: 1

      Uh, I think you missed his sarcasm.

    3. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by lgw · · Score: 1

      New college hires compete on a worldwide market regardless of immigration policy. Fresh out of college there's nothing to distinguish you from a world full of people claiming they can code, and junior dev work can mostly be done anywhere. It's only after 4-5 years when you move out of that mass of people, and might have something to offer that's hard to outsource.

      Remember, outsourcing is cheaper than any sort of immigration.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Your either from Pakistan, India or a CTO with a budget.

      Pretty sure he's from Whooshistan.

    5. Re:The world is falling apart at the seams by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is they taught too many girls to code. Since they only make 70 cents on the dollar a man makes* it's bringing the average down.

      Expect a Slashdot article any day now asking, "Should male tech workers demand higher wages for women?" Replies: 547.

      * I know the wage gap thing is bullshit; this post is a joke.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  7. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They will keep coming until the crumbs that are left after offshoring become a minimum wage job, and even then, H-1Bs have extreme loyalty because they get deported back to the -stan that they came from after they get fired, so even at minimum wage, they will still be there.

    Honestly, as a CS major, can I recommend it for other people? Hard to say. A previous /. article yesterday had someone stating that there isn't such thing as an unemployed lawyer. I probably would agree, assuming a state other than CA or NY. To boot, law isn't something offshorable, nor can one hire legions of H-1Bs to head to the courthouse. Same with plumbers, HVAC techs, and electricians. It is a humble job, but it pays the bills and is a decent living.

    Yes, there are a few people who can make a living, but those tend to be the distinct exception, and tend to be more PM types than actual coders. The majority of the programmers I know end up drifting from job to job, getting shown the door after 2-3 years when their project gets offshored or their manager calls Tata or Infosys. I wouldn't recommend that type of life, unless one found a distinct niche like embedded programming that required expertise that couldn't be learned out of a CS 101 coursebook.

  8. That should be hard to overlook. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

    If that were driving a large part of the change, it should only take a moment's work with the raw statistics to tease it out. I'd say "since they don't say that, it's probably not what's happening" -- but that would be making some possibly-unjustified assumptions about the motives of those publishing these results.

  9. Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage again by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    How we have too few CS people and we need more to do the work ?

  10. Negotiation pays dividends by clam666 · · Score: 2

    I started in IT at $22k, so screw them. Starting out of college at $67k. Highway robbery.

    But aside from getting off my lawn, a decrease is salaries is certainly a crappy situation if you made college into a tech school and thought you would be getting something near $75k after 4 years, and not you've just lost a percentage point.

    That having been said, IT jobs, from my experience, is so much about negotiation these days that $67 is almost meaningless, and kids today have access to far more knowledge to sound smart in interviews compared to pre-internet days where you couldn't parking-lot-google everything you need to know for a 5 minute primer discussion to sound knowledgeable.

    I think the smart and communicative ones are going to still command higher values, and those who luffed their way through are going to get the lower salaries.

    Where I work we pay anywhere from $45k to $110k depending on skillset, what you know, and experience. Your age isn't particularly used against you, other than you have no idea what you're worth currently, so they bone you down unless an interviewer says otherwise. We don't make you start at some Dev1 position regardless, we slot you in at higher values, even if you're knew, if you sound like you're competent, love to learn, and don't act like you know it all at 22.

    --
    I'm a satanic clam.
    1. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      i still remember when i was getting my CCNA, starting money was around 80 grand. by the time i graduated, it was cut in half

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Negotiation pays dividends by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 1

      $100k a year with ridiculously high cost of living (I've been to San Francisco, F that) is just like making $67k, instead you give more to Uncle Sam.

  11. Snow Slot by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, if you live in Minnesota and you think there are no tech jobs, you are probably right.

    I would think it would be the other way around. It's harder to fill positions where the weather is lousy, meaning more openings. H1B's from warm countries don't seem happy about the cold either. (Russian H1B's may not care).

    After the Dot-Com crash when I had to accept miscellaneous contracts to survive, the "cold" cities seemed to be more flexible about candidate requirements. A good many people really hate cold weather. (I personally prefer cold over humidity, if forced to choose.)

    1. Re:Snow Slot by plover · · Score: 1

      I've lived my whole life in the Minneapolis area, and with global warming plus all the skyways connecting the downtown buildings, weather is almost a non-factor for most of the time. Snow happens here like it does in most of the country, only we're better prepared so it isn't a big deal to us. I'm tapping this on a warm bus on my way home, and while traffic is bad ...

      Oh, my. The bus just passed a wreck where the fire department and state patrol are prying some guy out of an SUV that he wrapped around a snow covered guard rail.

      Holy shit, there goes my whole argument about how great this place is to live.

      --
      John
  12. Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Kagato · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've work in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market for over a decade. I get calls from recruiters daily. Clients can never find enough experienced people. There's tons of H1Bs working in the market. It's been like that for since about 2006. It can be hard as a college grad to find a job because some bean counter is weighing paying an experienced H1B worker a similar wage as a college hire (and the H1B can't easily leave without obtaining a new sponsor.) But, as the H1B cap have tightened it's forced companies to invest in college workers like they did in the 90s.

    To summarize, MN's general unemployment rate is 3.9%, it's tech unemployment rate is a fraction of a percent. It's jobs, jobs jobs if you know computers.

    1. Re: Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by ERJ · · Score: 2

      I also found this crazy. I just lost a couple guys with 5 years experience to jobs paying $100k+ which we just could not match. Even the new college grads have been in the $70k range... The MN job market certainly doesn't seem like it has tightened up to me.

  13. Re:College not a given for good earnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While I agree with the general gist of your comment, anyone who has enough education behind them to be worth 100k in loans who is working a job that could have been gotten with a HS diploma either has a useless degree, circumstances that you aren't making clear here that could justify their position in life or is plainly doing it wrong. At this point I'm tempted to ask if he finished college because something here just isn't adding up.

  14. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by swb · · Score: 2

    This is what I was going to say. I'm told there's never enough people, although maybe this is a "never enough people for what we want to pay" problem.

  15. Focus on K-12, stop funding college by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Focus effort on K-12 education. Stop funding college education for everyone. No government support for student loans; no free college from taxpayer money. When the businesses sweat, tell them ... tell them we have workers here, and that they can certainly find our fine, educated young men chomping at the bit, ready to take low salaries and transfer time-consuming grunt work off those high-salaried professionals while their employer works with them and funds their further education.

    You know, make the people who know what jobs they need, what expansion they expect, and what it is their business does take the social responsibility of building the American workforce.

    We're so obsessed with putting high risks on the individual, demanding they speculate on the greater market, take on the risk of unemployment themselves, go years without building their career to get an education, and then hope that everyone else didn't see the same opportunity and speculate the same way and flood the market. It is the poor who can least sustain themselves when this risk fails them, and the rich who stand to benefit most from this method of operation. This arrangement benefits businesses by producing cheap, surplus, skilled labor; it benefits the middle class and upper class by providing them a stronger position in their self-driven education than the poor; and it benefits the poor least by burdening them with the consequences of dicking around in college hoping for a future career when they could be trying to get into their career now, immediately, for pay--a burden that the poor are less capable of carrying than the more affluent.

    But no, we don't see the poison; we only see the plate.

    1. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by vandamme · · Score: 1

      How did a Republican get in here?

    2. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Every time someone disagrees with me, I'm either called a Conservative or a Liberal, a Republican, a Democrat, a Tea Partier or a Socialist. Even on the same discussion.

      The truth is I have no friends, have no social life, have no desire for a social life, and work directly in strict facts and reality. The things I say come from facts, from analysis, from science and mathematics; if all you have is political bullshit, then I can simply point and laugh and dismiss you as a kook along with those Xenu worshippers.

    3. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Stop funding college education for everyone. No government support for student loans; no free college from taxpayer money.

      This is a horrible idea.

      When the businesses sweat, tell them ... tell them we have workers here, and that they can certainly find our fine, educated young men chomping at the bit, ready to take low salaries and transfer time-consuming grunt work off those high-salaried professionals while their employer works with them and funds their further education.

      Except they won't. We're in a more globalized economy than ever before. The tech industry here doesn't have to exist here specifically, and it's continually outsourcing whenever possible. The saving grace is that those educated here are usually more qualified and higher quality, even compared to most H1Bs.

      Making it more difficult to get the education needed to be competitive is the last thing we should be doing. Maybe instead of eliminating college subsidies we just eliminate the art history subsidies.

      putting high risks on the individual, demanding they speculate on the greater market, take on the risk of unemployment themselves, go years without building their career to get an education, and then hope that everyone else didn't see the same opportunity and speculate the same way and flood the market.

      More people qualified to create valuable, exportable products is never a bad thing (assuming it isn't an immediate influx). An industry can shrink or grow based on available talent.

      it benefits the poor least by burdening them with the consequences of dicking around in college hoping for a future career when they could be trying to get into their career now, immediately, for pay

      You mean a career at mcdonalds? This may be true if you're really "dicking around", but if you're studying hard for a quality education then yes it does benefit the poor. Education is the best way to lift anyone out of poverty.

      Businesses ultimately pay for the education of their graduates through salary. It's true that it would be nice to get businesses to invest more in education directly, but eliminating government subsidies is not the way.

    4. Re:Focus on K-12, stop funding college by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      More people qualified to create valuable, exportable products is never a bad thing (assuming it isn't an immediate influx). An industry can shrink or grow based on available talent.

      Yeah, of course. As long as those morons go into debt and get compsci and engineering degrees, we can sift through 40 or 50 resumes and remind them that they're basically worth the dog shit on the bottom of our shoes, and pick the few who are willing to lick our boots. The other 74% can work at McDonalds for the same pay.

      Let's get more available talent deep in debt so we can push their salaries even further down, reduce their benefits more, and generally abuse our employees. If they get snippy, we fire them; there's like 4 times as many employable degree holders out there as there are jobs anyway, we won't have a problem filling our positions.

      You mean a career at mcdonalds? This may be true if you're really "dicking around", but if you're studying hard for a quality education then yes it does benefit the poor. Education is the best way to lift anyone out of poverty.

      4 more years without a job to get what amounts to a high school diploma--because damn near everyone has a bachelor's degree, so you're not really getting elevated--is not lifting anyone out of poverty. It's putting risks and demands on them that will impact their lives forever; it's putting risks on them that they can't afford, that they don't have the money to control. It's putting strain on them that more affluent people can better manage and survive.

      Businesses ultimately pay for the education of their graduates through salary.

      Businesses ultimately benefit from mass college education through a labor market surplus, resulting in reduced salaries. Instead of paying $150k for a programmer in 1995, they pay $63,700 for a programer in 2010.

      It's true that it would be nice to get businesses to invest more in education directly, but eliminating government subsidies is not the way.

      I'm not talking about where money comes from, but how.

      You, the individual, have to get a college degree. What degree do you get? If you look at the job market, you will see Project Managers are coming into high demand. In the coming years, entry-level salaries of $85-$100k are on the table. So you become a Project Manager, you get your degree in 2019, you get your PMP; and, in 2019, you find that the fastest-growing career field has become a glutenous mess like computer programming, and a good Project Manager makes about $65k, possibly $75k when your career is developed out, if he can get a job at all. Enjoy your unemployment.

      When a business examines its operations, it projects growth in the coming years. It sees expansion, sees that it needs more Project Managers, more Computer Programmers. It hires some new people with minimal qualifications, possibly uneducated and untrained, for cheap. It then begins training and educating them, paying for their tuition, moving grunt work from the high-dollar labor onto the lower-skilled labor. It builds a workforce, because it knows what workforce it needs; the business takes almost no risk in this, and the laborer IS BEING PAID TO BE EDUCATED and so takes no risk.

      As long as the business can just wait for the individual to make themselves into the labor force needed, the business will do nothing. It's not a matter of chipping money in; if you wanted to do that, pay for college entirely in business payroll taxes, and you would still have a sub-optimal system with fewer jobs, higher unemployment, and lower salaries, with individuals taking risks and spending four years or more incapable of entering their career field and basically wasting their time sitting in a classroom.

      You want a horrible idea? Government subsidizing the labor market to prop up

  16. I think the poster misread the graph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, if you live in Minnesota and you think there are no tech jobs, you are probably right.

    Funny, just because the dot is a little smaller and a little lighter on the map in the Minneapolis/St. Paul doesn't mean there are "no tech jobs." In fact, there is effectively negative unemployment for software developers around here.

  17. Re:Thanks Obama and Obamacare by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Gov't enforced healthcare hasn't hurt Canada's and Germany's economy (among others). And how is more people being healed harming the economy? Healing services are part of the economy also.

    If it's because Canada and Germany do "socialized"* healthcare right and we don't, then GOP should push to copy their systems rather than push to rid a healthcare plan altogether.

    We need more analysts and problem solvers in DC, not whiners. There's a glut of whiners there.

    * It's a bit of a stretch to call it "socialism". It's pretty much mandated insurance, but gives one market-based choice of providers. It was invented by Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank (yes, such things exist, or at least used to).

  18. Great by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    Less people who are unable to write a short article, use Google, and use their brain for thinking.

    But oh these drop is in the US? Too bad. So no change here.

  19. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yep, unemployment in tech in the Twin cities is lower than 2 % and its easy to find work. The original poster is probably in rural MN (or vastly overestimates his skills or employ-ability), Because skilled jobs are simply not as good or as plentiful in rural areas.

  20. Starting salaries... by foghelmut · · Score: 2

    These starting salaries look extremely inflated. Perhaps to draw more students into the programs? Or am I severely underpaid?

    1. Re:Starting salaries... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      The problem is where these high paying jobs are located. Making $75k is nothing when you have a 1500 sqft 2 bedroom house with no garage and it costs $250k.

      I think a better measure of income is how much a wage is relative to the local average income. I would rather make $50k/year where the average income is $25k than making $100k where the average income is $75k. Assuming it's a nice place to live, of course.

    2. Re:Starting salaries... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Wondering the same thing. I make around the same after 10 years of this bullshit.

      That might or might not be so bad. It really depends on the cost of living where you live. You might be better off than someone making 100k where the cost of living is really high.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    3. Re:Starting salaries... by callahan2211 · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. I'd rather have $50k/year and 10 minute drive to work vs 100k/year and 50 minute drive to work. Also, don't understand why there is not more telecommuting.

      --
      "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
    4. Re:Starting salaries... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Really? The extra time you would spend commuting would be at a rate of roughly $180 an hour if you took the higher paying job. I would gladly commute for that much more money per hour of commute.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  21. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by PRMan · · Score: 1

    The summary conflates "tech jobs" with programming jobs. They aren't the same. The map does nothing to show programming jobs. Only those at "high-tech" companies.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  22. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by unimacs · · Score: 1

    If the OP based that statement on the map in the report, they either missed the big blue dot smack dab on the Minneapolis/St Paul metro area, thought it was in Wisconsin or doesn't really know which state Minnesota is.

  23. Re:Good by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you're in CS...out of school, take the jobs you can get, learn, get resume experience and NETWORK with people.

    Once you've paid your dues doing this awhile....incorporate yourself and contract. Especially if you can get into Federal Contracting, the money is good, you often can get on LONG term projects, the bill rate is much better, and it also helps discriminate in favor of being a US citizen, especially if there is a clearance required, no H1B's or other foreigners allowed in many of those positions.

    That is where the money is at these days.

    But, incorporate yourself so you can work corp-to-corp and they won't be scared of you having to be a W2 employee. I myself prefer the S-Corp, saves you a fortune of employment taxes (SS/Medicare) in that you don't have to pay that on all money billed, only a portion of it.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  24. Re: Good by shakah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Rightly or wrongly, doctors and lawyers have well-established blocks that effectivly bar outside competition.

  25. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by unimacs · · Score: 2

    The summary conflates "tech jobs" with programming jobs. They aren't the same. The map does nothing to show programming jobs. Only those at "high-tech" companies.

    That's true. The report is about "advanced industries". The OP really just screwed up though.

    Even that report indicates that Minneapolis/St. Paul ranks 15th in the nation in terms of advanced industry jobs. Not exactly at the top, but definitely "above average" as they say on Prairie Home Companion.

  26. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe if Congress weren't busy sucking Zuck and Gates and Larry's dicks, they'd actually call hearings as to why CS grads were earning less if there were this huge shortage of programmers. Either (a) our economic models are somehow incredibly wrong, (b) we're teaching CS students absolutely nothing useful, or (c) it was a ruse to lower labor costs to increase profits all along.

    Other than that, I'll just say I have a suspicion as to which of those three causes is most pertinent.

    --
    That is all.
  27. Re:Good by nobuddy · · Score: 2

    get in a job with a clearance. Any job, even if it is cleaning the urinals. Once you have that clearance you are golden. The jobs come to you.
    I never worry about my current job, my inbox is full of offers that I can step in to on a moment's notice.

  28. East Coast vs. the South by tepples · · Score: 1

    North Carolina is on the East Coast.

    That's true geographically. But economically, I thought the "East Coast" started at Virginia and continued north to New England, and everything south of Virginia (Carolinas, Georgia, Florida) was "the South". I include Virginia in the East Coast because of its ties to DC and AOL's headquarters prior to 2007.

  29. How do I shot network? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you're in CS...out of school, take the jobs you can get, learn, get resume experience and NETWORK with people.

    I don't think a CCNA certification would help with the kind of networking you're thinking of. So what resources would you recommend for someone just getting started with this "networking"? Searching for networking returns a bunch of irrelevant results about computer networks, and social networking has become the cesspool known as Facebook.

    1. Re:How do I shot network? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Your search-fu is weak, tepples-san.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:How do I shot network? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Err...I guess I'm talking about the old fashioned people skills, and networking to make and keep contacts with people.

      Hell, I'm not even on Facebook or twitter, or linked in, but yet, I still have a treasure trove of folks I've worked with in the past and keep up with (phone, email) and when I need a job, I reach out to them and they usually have leads for me and recommend me.

      All this was done WAY prior to social networks you know. Maybe that's the problem, kids today don't know how to connect with and gather people connections if it doesn't involve having your face stuck in Facebook all day.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:How do I shot network? by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      You have your CCNA? Any knowledge of Cisco call centers? Seriously, if you do, my company is looking for engineers. Believe it or not, networking happens online too.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  30. Snoopy as usual, I see by tepples · · Score: 1

    However, there is a *huge* shortage of tech workers willing to work for peanuts.

    Perhaps the one thing worse than working for Peanuts Worldwide is working for Scott Adams' company.

    1. Re:Snoopy as usual, I see by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I dunno. They don't like hiring induhviduals. And who can blame them? But that means that most slashdotters wouldn't make the grade.

      OTOH, we long-time members of DNRC are shoo-ins.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  31. Re:Good by dave562 · · Score: 1

    Especially if you can get into Federal Contracting, the money is good

    This is an interesting perspective. I just interviewed someone in the DC area who is looking to get out of Federal contracting because their perception is that it is getting harder to find stable work.

    Now granted, I ended up passing on the person because their skills were not up to par and that might very well explain their challenge with finding work.

    Is there a specific skill set that you find is in demand among Federal contractors?

  32. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

    I've work in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market for over a decade. I get calls from recruiters daily. Clients can never find enough experienced people. There's tons of H1Bs working in the market. It's been like that for since about 2006. It can be hard as a college grad to find a job because some bean counter is weighing paying an experienced H1B worker a similar wage as a college hire (and the H1B can't easily leave without obtaining a new sponsor.) But, as the H1B cap have tightened it's forced companies to invest in college workers like they did in the 90s.

    To summarize, MN's general unemployment rate is 3.9%, it's tech unemployment rate is a fraction of a percent. It's jobs, jobs jobs if you know computers.

    It's the same everywhere. Recruiters are desperate to find workers willing to fill positions at 50% of the usual salary.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  33. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Maybe if Congress weren't busy sucking Zuck and Gates and Larry's dicks, ...

    Sounds like someone hasn't read the small print in the standard Oracle support contract.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  34. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I don't believe it. HR departments quite often want an exact fit for their org's specific tool stack, regardless of how arbitrary it is, and don't want to train near matches nor wait for a learning curve.

    They expect, or at least lobby for, unrealistic instant gratification at generic prices. As a consumer I too want instant customization at a generic price. But, it's not realistic.

    Train! (or give time to self-train)
       

  35. Re:Minnesota - No Tech Job? Huh? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    It's probably a supply/demand thing, then. This study was only looking at the demand, but if there are fewer tech workers than required jobs, it's still great to be a programmer.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  36. Re:Meanwhile in the California... by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 1

    And rent is like $3000 a month for a studio apartment

    --
    I don't want to do a sig now
  37. Re:Good by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly, I don't get where all this doom and gloom about software engineering career opportunities is coming from all over slashdot.

    It is called "selection bias". The people gainfully employed are too busy to post.

  38. I Know by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's jobs, jobs jobs if you know computers.

    Wait - this is a UNIX system! I know this!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I Know by s.petry · · Score: 1

      In some regions, sure. I live in the SF bay area and am contacted daily by recruiters. I moved here from Detroit however, where there are few jobs and no pay. I laughed at a recruiter from GM who called me and offered me 30K/yr to work as a Senior Team lead when they were pulling IT jobs back to Detroit from overseas about 3 years ago. With the shit economy in Detroit, they had plenty of people willing to work for peanuts because it's peanuts or starve.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re:I Know by Kagato · · Score: 1

      That was a Unix system. Specifically File System Navigator for Silicon Graphics's unix system IRIX. At the time SGI was pretty popular in movie production. Albeit quite unrealistic for a tween to have a $15k unix workstation.

      But hey, at her age I had Slackware running on a machine, installed from a from a bunch of floppy disks.

  39. "CS Grads!" everyone is missing this part... by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 1

    They are specifically talking about people right out of college with a CS degree. Any one in the field will tell you 4 years of hands on experience out weights 4 years of academic work. Once they are our of college, you now have to re-train that grad to do real world work.

  40. Re: Good by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

    There are tons of unemployed and underemployed lawyers. The profession is saturated and many never work in the field.

  41. bankruptcy student loans by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    bankruptcy for student loans is needed

    1. Re:bankruptcy student loans by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That's not an answer. Or rather, it's almost the answer I suggested.

      Student loans are Federally guaranteed--and now Federal. Bankruptcy for Federal loans is just a roundabout way of saying "free college, but we destroy your life in the process" (bankruptcy will liquidate your assets and shit; it's not just a straight 7-year mark on your credit). Bankruptcy for private loans just means we shift the burden off the Government and onto the banks, who then need to perform their own risk analysis; but bankruptcy can be quick, and default would likely be around 75% (same as underemployment: 74% of STEM degree holders do not have STEM jobs), so the availability of private loans would collapse due to the impact on banks's profits.

      I don't believe banks would take on the risk. It is too much, too volatile. Student loans can be mishandled through no fault of the student, and aren't very diversified: they're a bet on the market in the future, and the student may need to change direction mid-flight, or may come out the other end to a brick wall--either of which results in greatly increased risk for the lender. Other lenders making loans also increases risk: the more students you have, the more likely each individual is to default, and thus the more risk you have per debt object. This is not a good place for a business to put itself.

      No, bankruptcy for student loans is only a natural aspect of what I have said: no government intervention, no free college, no Federally-backed loans. As soon as that happens, students can get out of loans by bankruptcy; those who do will find it a terrible answer, but they will also find it a great relief. The banks will find it severely damaging to their profits, and will pull out of the Daddy Warbucks business of sending everyone's kids to college. Student loans will be small, largely for continuing education, lent to people who already have developed careers; but the vacuum of skilled labor will require fresh blood too volatile to fund, and the employers will need to take up that risk because the banks simply will refuse.

  42. Re:Good by joocemann · · Score: 1

    ....welcome to the real world. It's not so cushy.

  43. Nice try. From the 2015 Salary Survey PDF: by felix+rayman · · Score: 1

    "These results come as Salary Survey has undergone a major change in its methodology."
    ...
    "Comparisons to prior years’ Salary Surveys will also not be included and are not recommended as the methodologies are dissimilar and comparisons would not be accurate.

    link

  44. Re:Good by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    > get in a job with a clearance.

    Then you often cannot publish, nor can you discuss details of your work with the best non-military people in the field. You can also wind up ordered to commit illegal or unconstitutional acts with no safe legal or political recourse. Do remember that Edward Snowden was a contractor and reported illegal activity to his superiors, and was told to "shut up" before he want to the press with very solid proof of illegal and abusive and unconstitutional activity by parts of the federal government.

  45. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by houghi · · Score: 1

    When I look at your A, B and C, I do not see how one excludes the other. This is not OR/OR, this is AND/AND.
    I would also add the fact that government is there for the companies and not for the people.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  46. Re:Perhaps they can explain the STEM shortage agai by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 1

    Or my vote: (d) All of the above.

  47. Re:Good by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Then you often cannot publish, nor can you discuss details of your work with the best non-military people in the field. You can also wind up ordered to commit illegal or unconstitutional acts with no safe legal or political recourse. Do remember that Edward Snowden was a contractor and reported illegal activity to his superiors, and was told to "shut up" before he want to the press with very solid proof of illegal and abusive and unconstitutional activity by parts of the federal government.

    Clearance jobs aren't ONLY for super top secret stuff, just handling personnel, PeopleSoft jobs even for the Feds require clearances.

    SO, you don't have to worry about anything "illegal". It isn't just the three letter agencies that I was talking about above,in fact, those are a TINY part of the jobs I was talking bout with govt contracting.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  48. Re: Good by vandamme · · Score: 1

    So much for the law of supply and demand.

  49. Michigan employment by Uloi · · Score: 1

    I can tell you why there are so many jobs in tech for MI. People forget about it but, in 2008 we all got laid off, like literally 30-40%. What did the laid off people do? We left the State. Now companies are thinking dam we needed those people. I live in WA now. I can (and have) get a job offer in MI with 2 phone calls. I can't say its that easy in WA.

  50. Re: Good by airdweller · · Score: 1

    "Go go law school, get an awful job for 30k a year, making 50k after nearly 4 years of trial experience."
    That's odd. A personal anecdote: I have two friends who are lawyers. Both are in their early thirties. Both passed the bar exam about 4 years ago. Both started making above 100k after 3 years. Both said all the lawyers they knew who had worked in the field for more than 5-6 years made above 150k. Contract/civil procedure/corporate law. Also, according to them, public defenders make about 80k.

    PS. Looks like it's easier for devs to make above 60k (I know a recent graduate whose first job is 60k, several mid-level devs who make about 90k and one friend with a PhD who makes 150k at Google), but it's easier for lawyers to go above 120k.

  51. Every job is like this now by johncandale · · Score: 1

    There is just not lots of good work around anymore. Even fed ex drivers are independent contractors that don't get any benefits or company paid unemployment services. So everyone in those jobs are fighting to get the few better jobs, driving everything down. There is good work around, but it's so limited, even middle class work is becoming a elitist circle. Those inside the circle just don't get how many more people are outside it now. "I'm making 80k out of college, you can too" is just not true for the vast majority of people.

  52. Building people skills by tepples · · Score: 1

    Err...I guess I'm talking about the old fashioned people skills, and networking to make and keep contacts with people.

    I figured as much. It's hard for some people to build the necessary people skills from scratch, especially people who tend toward the systemizing end of the spectrum.

    I still have a treasure trove of folks I've worked with in the past and keep up with (phone, email) [...] Maybe that's the problem, kids today don't know how to connect with and gather people connections

    Perhaps you're right. I don't remember having been taught how to keep up with past contacts in high school. And that's why I don't even know where to start.