Slashdot Mirror


Tattoos Found To Interfere With Apple Watch Sensors

An anonymous reader writes: A number of early Apple Watch adopters have complained that their tattoos cause interference with many of the new product's key features. According to multiple tattooed sources, inked wrists and hands can disrupt communication with the wearable's sensors installed in the underside of the device leading to malfunction. Owners of Apple Watch have taken to social media to voice their frustration using the hashtag #tattoogate and sharing their disappointment over the newly discovered Apple flaw. One user reported that the Watch's lock system did not disable as it should when the device was placed on a decorated area of skin – forcing those affected to constantly enter their security pins. A further source suggested that notification alerts would fail to 'ping' as they are supposed to, and that heart rate monitoring differed significantly between tattooed and non-tattooed wrist readings.

253 of 403 comments (clear)

  1. Struggle by kv9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The ultimate hipster struggle is real!

    1. Re:Struggle by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      This means 100% Hip just cannot happen!
      Me I have no interest in either having an Apple Watch (unless it goes down by $200) and I don't want a Tattoo.
      But I never was Hip anyways, back in my day it was called cool.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Struggle by netsavior · · Score: 5, Funny

      first they made the iphone 6+ incompatible with skinny jeans and now this. Next thing you know ornate beards will wreck the facial recognition in iPhoto or whatever they call it now.

    3. Re:Struggle by j2.718ff · · Score: 4, Informative

      The ultimate hipster struggle is real!

      Since when do hipsters care about whether their fashion is actually functional or not? Having a watch that doesn't fully work may be more hipster than one that does.

    4. Re:Struggle by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...you really should see it in action though. As someone who lives in Portland, OR... I can, even now, hear the distant howls of heart-rending anguish from the many coffeeshops drifting up to my office. You'd think that skinny jeans were banned or something.

      Okay, just (half-) joking.

      I'm slightly amused at it though - no one really thought it through that if you put colored shit in your dermis** , it will interfere with a device that relies on skin capacitance for some of its features? Really? Are we that damned ignorant (and overly-entitled) as human beings, or is my beard just getting too many gray hairs in it?

      ** I have four tattoos about my body, incidentally, so all you 'inked' mofos can keep your righteous indignation to yourselves. ;)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    5. Re:Struggle by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh god, please tell me that the screen can at least tolerate a small amount of mustache wax and that its alarms won't interfere with the warm sound of my vinyl records!!

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    6. Re:Struggle by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Honestly though, if HP released web cameras which couldn't see black folks, I find this strangely unsurprising.

      Apparently people who build these things assume everyone is the same shade of pasty white.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Struggle by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not so sure that's true. I think that wearing an Apple watch even though it doesn't work, due to your rad ink might even make it hipper.

    8. Re:Struggle by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Maybe you can share some insight into the mind of a person getting a tattoo, but it seems like they can't be thinking too far forward at the time. Most of the designs look terrible after a decade or two, and are often things that are trendy now but won't be in a few years time. Quite a few people seem to get Chinese or Japanese tattoos without even bothering to figure out if they say what they think they say.

      So unless I'm missing something it doesn't seem all that surprising that people would not think too hard about how the watch is supposed to work. I'm am surprised that this is the first big issue to come to light with the Apple watch though, I thought it would be people having reactions to the metal that they never knew about because it's the first time they are wearing a watch.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Struggle by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

      What I want to know is this: how did he afford an Apple Watch on a record-store clerk's pay?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:Struggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm a navy veteran and have many naughty themed tattoos.

      FTFY ;)

    11. Re:Struggle by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to be clear, we're all joking about Apple only being popular with hipsters, but in main-stream numbers. Correct?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Struggle by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I wish I was a hipster, but my pants keep falling down.
      Anyway, I don't abuse my body with meaningless skin graffiti.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    13. Re:Struggle by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1, Funny

      Honestly though, if HP released web cameras which couldn't see black folks, I find this strangely unsurprising.

      Apparently people who build these things assume everyone is the same shade of pasty white.

      The show Better Off Ted addressed something like this in their episode Racial Sensitivity when Veridian Dynamics installs new security sensors in the building, which detect employees based on the light reflecting off their skin and they can't detect black people. Veronica assures Ted that the company cares about the issue:

      Ted: The system doesn't see black people?
      Veronica: I know. Weird, huh?
      Ted: That's more than weird, Veronica. That's basically, well... racist.
      Veronica: The company's position is that it's actually the opposite of racist, because it's not targeting black people. It's just ignoring them. They insist the worst people can call it is "indifferent."
      Ted: Well, they know it has to be fixed, right? Please... at least say they know that.
      Veronica: Of course they do, and they're working on it. In the meantime they'd like everyone to celebrate the fact that it sees Hispanics, Asians, Pacific Islanders, and Jews.

      Though, as true for most corporations, only cares just so much...

      Veronica: "Money before people," that's the company motto. Engraved on the lobby floor. It just looks more heroic in Latin.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    14. Re:Struggle by jfengel · · Score: 3, Informative

      They definitely did test it on people with naturally dark skin, and it works fine. The natural pigments are fairly transparent to the green light they're using. It's the artificial pigments, which are blacker than any actual black people, that are problematic.

    15. Re:Struggle by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      In my case, it was a combination of alcohol and a buddy in the barracks with a tattoo gun. All but one turned out astoundingly well in spite of my dumbassed youthful decision. Mind you, 25 years later I still carry 'em everywhere I go (all of them were fully within USAF regulations, in that all but one hides nicely under my shirt, and a std. shirt collar hides the one on the back of my neck).

      Funny thing though - nowadays, kids who get tattoos (esp. amateur ones) can remove them with what's called Wrecking Balm, which is supposed to fade and eventually remove a tattoo over the course of some weeks. (no idea if it fully works or not, though.)

      I wonder if the hipster crowd will use that cream in a little circle on their wrist in order to get even more hipster cred...?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    16. Re:Struggle by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      oh no - my mother always said that getting a tattoo was a bad idea! She said, "just you wait - you'll see."

    17. Re:Struggle by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Quite a few people seem to get Chinese or Japanese tattoos without even bothering to figure out if they say what they think they say.

      Or not understanding the basics of the written language. I've seen more than one example where a word is composed of two characters but one of the them is written in traditional and the other is in simplified. That's like getting a word tattoo that is in two different fonts with part of it in Olde English script (and spellings) and the other in modern sans serif.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    18. Re:Struggle by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not about capacitance. The watch shines different coloured light through the skin and monitors colour changes to figure certain things out. Ink is going to absorb or reflect that light in a way that the watch isn't calibrated to handle. Ink isn't melanin, so darker skinned people won't have the same problems.

      My sleeves look a lot better than an Apple watch ever could, but I may just barely have enough open skin to wear one if I wanted to.

    19. Re:Struggle by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not that hard. You can save up a good amount of money with a job like that when you live with your parents and they pay for all your food.

    20. Re:Struggle by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Lots of hipster jokes in these comments, but I like yours the best. Seriously, what's up with the mustache wax? Maybe they don't like getting laid.

    21. Re:Struggle by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      You've been marked as a troll, but I don't really think that's fair. Not everyone wants a tattoo or understands the tattoos that other people get.

      I know these things are going to be on my arms for the rest of my life. And when I wake up in the morning and look at them, I think, "these are the arms I should've been born with".

      First of all, you have to understand that not all tattoos are created equal. I paid $150/hr for mine. I looked for a long time for an artist whose style I liked, and when we sat down and did them, it took a really long time. All tattoos fade and bleed a bit, but good artists will know how to handle that a little. But hey, when I'm 80, I'm gonna be a little faded and fuzzy around the edges too.

      My sleeves are thematic--I was born in the year of the Snake, in a fire cycle. I already had the words for 'fire' and 'snake' tattooed each on one wrist. My right arm is a red and black snake wrapped around bamboo with clouds, and my left arm is a blue, slick snake on a backdrop of flames and smoke. (Their mouths are closed, and they look quite happy--I firmly believe you need to be able to talk or fight your way out of any tattoo you have, and I dislike aggressive snakes for myself, because I'm not going to want to fight my way out of anything.)

      Anyway, my tattoos are just a way for me to feel closer to part of my culture. They're a pretty bit of art that I get to carry around with me. They look good with the clothes I wear, like any accessory. That's what I wanted out of them, and that's what I got.

      Other people have other reasons, but those are mine. :)

  2. Waitasecondhere... by bytethese · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're saying that pigments with metal particles in them are blocking certain wavelengths of light from penetrating the skin? I'm shocked. I'm shocked, Cotton!

    1. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that there's a technical issue isn't what matters. What matters is that they apparently either didn't think to test it, or didn't warn purchasers that it might be an issue.

    2. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, if only their mum's had warned them that they'd regret having tattoos when they were older.

      Now if they didn't work on black people, you'd have a story, but nobody said the Watch would work over tattoos, and nobody asked either.

    3. Re:Waitasecondhere... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Also, #clickbaitheadlines not withstanding, it's true for all the wrist type devices.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Waitasecondhere... by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, actually they did.

      https://support.apple.com/en-u...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For the tiny percent of people who have tattoos that cover all the way down, why would they waste money or resources trying to figure out that last barely 1 percent or less? That makes no sense from a business stand point, on the other hand I totally agree with you on they should have a warning for those people with tattoo. For most, there is still time to return the watch, stop being major cry babies, thats how you let companies know there product has problems, RETURN IT.

    6. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      reminds me of the "you're holding the phone the wrong way" issue. It amazes me in this day in age these interesting issues keep coming up from apple. Yes I know other company's have them to but apple suppose to be the best right ?

      Also I wonder if apple will say "you are waring your watch the wrong way"

    7. Re:Waitasecondhere... by rockout · · Score: 3, Informative

      or C) neither of the above

      https://support.apple.com/en-u...

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    8. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, Apple early adopters failed to RTFM. I'm shocked.

    9. Re:Waitasecondhere... by grnbrg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, starting yesterday, anyway...

      http://web.archive.org/web/201...

    10. Re:Waitasecondhere... by dontbemad · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just to make a note: That article currently has a "last modified" date of April 29th. For comparison, I've linked to the April 9th snapshot of the same article.

      http://web.archive.org/web/201...

      No mention of tattoos anywhere, to my knowledge. Granted, this is being fairly pedantic, but it surprises me that posters on slashdot would look at a page on the web in its current form and make statements that seem to imply that page has always existed in that same form.

    11. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have an archive link for that?

      "Last Modified: Apr 29, 2015 " - makes me think they noticed and edited

    12. Re:Waitasecondhere... by putaro · · Score: 1

      If you read the support article, you'll see that it mentions that it may not be able to get your heart rate if you have tattoos, not that you'll have to keep entering your PIN because it thinks you've taken it off your wrist.

    13. Re:Waitasecondhere... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Now if they didn't work on black people, you'd have a story, but nobody said the Watch would work over tattoos, and nobody asked either.

      Actually, since you mention it, they were talking about just that issue not long ago (early last week, maybe?) before this "Tattoogate" bullshit started. Can't seem to find a link now, since it's all "tattoos" now and apparently you can't do "-keyword" in search engines anymore

    14. Re:Waitasecondhere... by pr0fessor · · Score: 4, Informative

      That was recently modified to include the part about tattoos check the page in the wayback machine before it was updated yesterday.

      http://web.archive.org/web/201...

    15. Re:Waitasecondhere... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Yes let's completely ignore that a $10,000 smart device should have taken that into account during development.

      Honestly, I'd not have thought about it either....such a fringe thing that it likely wouldn't have been thought up.

      I don't know that many people that have so much of their skin painted up that it would cause interference. I'd guess most professional folks, like the IT folks at Apple aren't all painted up from head to toe with tattoos.

      Sure, lots of folks these days may have one or two, but usually they're somewhere what is hidden while wearing at least business casual clothing which would generally mean not running down your arms onto and past your wrists....?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked Apple provides any documentation, "because it just works".

    17. Re:Waitasecondhere... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      For the tiny percent of people who have tattoos that cover all the way down, why would they waste money or resources trying to figure out that last barely 1 percent or less? That makes no sense from a business stand point, on the other hand I totally agree with you on they should have a warning for those people with tattoo. For most, there is still time to return the watch, stop being major cry babies, thats how you let companies know there product has problems, RETURN IT.

      So, GM shouldn't have fixed the ignition key problem because it affects even less than your "barely 1%"? And if a laptop design has barely 1% of cpus fail out of the box, that's okay? Or drugs or contaminated food shouldn't be recalled because it only affects barely 1%? Can you change your name from Anonymous Coward to Corporate Shill?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    18. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 2

      They did notice and edit. You are absolutely correct.

      Gotta edit those marketing materials before people notice!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    19. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      Plus the MS Band seems to work fine with sleeve tattoos using the same basic method.

    20. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 2

      " B) tattoos that contain metal (which isn't present in most of the ink that US Tattoo artists use)? Yeah no."

      Good job on your chemistry failure.

      Carbon acts like a metal in various situations. It even bonds to metal quite readily. Carbon also interferes with all kinds of things when it comes to light sensors.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Eloking · · Score: 1

      Um, actually they did.

      https://support.apple.com/en-u...

      Bullshit! ACTUALLY they edited the page April 29th to add the tattoo part. The cached page from April 27th doesn't have anything about it.

      --
      Elok
    22. Re:Waitasecondhere... by itzly · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, basically you're saying that Apple is wrong to call blood red.

      I'm not convinced.

    23. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "such a fringe thing that it likely wouldn't have been thought up."

      Most of the idiot Apple 'Geniuses' I've encountered have near full-sleeve tattoos going to damn near their palm.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    24. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would they bother testing? Tattoos are worn by:

      - The homeless
      - Schizophrenics
      - Minimum-wage workers
      - Sailors
      - Old-school bikers

      None of these are in the Apple demographic. Do you think Tim has a tattoo...?

    25. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, they didn't.

      Original post via wayback machine

      Post modified yesterday.

      Try again, Apple Apologist.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re:Waitasecondhere... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't get out much ... the kids go straight to full sleeves these days because they're cool and highly visible.

      The tramp stamp of years ago has been replaced with brightly colored new school sleeves. I wouldn't be cool and edgy if people didn't know you had it.

      Honestly, if Apple didn't have some inked up folks around I'd be surprised. But chances are nobody ever thought of it as a test case.

      Many people have lots of ink which can be hidden when needed ... but a lot of kids start with the highly visible ones which only the hardcore used to have.

      Gone are the days of the body-suit which nobody could see if you wore long sleeves.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    27. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "If you read the support article"

      Which you obviously didn't do, or you'd have seen the page was edited yesterday, and that a wayback machine check shows they didn't talk about tattoos in the first fucking place.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    28. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "For the tiny percent of people who have tattoos that cover all the way down, why would they waste money or resources trying to figure out that last barely 1 percent or less?"

      Are you too stupid to figure out Apple runs off of hipster blood?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    29. Re:Waitasecondhere... by scotts13 · · Score: 1

      When I worked as an Apple repair tech, two out of every three machines off the line would fail and would require immediate refurbishing.

      Yeah, no. I worked as an Apple service manager, and the initial failure rate is in the low single digits - the best in the industry. Try again, pal.

    30. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Also, #clickbaitheadlines not withstanding, it's true for all the wrist type devices."

      You mean all wrist devices that aren't ENGINEERED WITH REALITY IN MIND AND ONLY FOCUS ON HIPSTER BULLSHIT.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    31. Re:Waitasecondhere... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      But it does say this:

      "Even under ideal conditions, Apple Watch may not be able to get a reliable heart rate reading every time for everybody. And for a small percentage of users, various factors may make it impossible to get any heart rate reading at all."

      Tattoos being one of the 'various factors'.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    32. Re:Waitasecondhere... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Then explain how it works.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    33. Re:Waitasecondhere... by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it does say this:

      "Even under ideal conditions, Apple Watch may not be able to get a reliable heart rate reading every time for everybody. And for a small percentage of users, various factors may make it impossible to get any heart rate reading at all."

      Tattoos being one of the 'various factors' that they didn't explicitly say, then later did. Big whoop.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    34. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Eloking · · Score: 1

      But it does say this:

      "Even under ideal conditions, Apple Watch may not be able to get a reliable heart rate reading every time for everybody. And for a small percentage of users, various factors may make it impossible to get any heart rate reading at all."

      Tattoos being one of the 'various factors'.

      So you're saying the average hipster will make the conclusion that the heart sensor might not work because of his tattoo "prior" purchase after reading that part? Really?

      --
      Elok
    35. Re:Waitasecondhere... by zieroh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that *some* green light is reflected from blood misses the point. It absorbs *most* of the green light, and therefore green is useful. And if you want to quibble with that, then you probably suck at your job.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    36. Re:Waitasecondhere... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It's Apple. The whole POINT of the thing is that you don't have to RTFM.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    37. Re:Waitasecondhere... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Most of the idiot Apple 'Geniuses' I've encountered have near full-sleeve tattoos going to damn near their palm.

      I haven't ever seen this at the Apple Store here and this is New Orleans, where anything goes...??!?!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    38. Re:Waitasecondhere... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      It measures heart rate through the skin. So any skin changes - tattoos, birthmarks, scars, etc - would affect it.

      So, yes.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    39. Re:Waitasecondhere... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      If they are not retarded, sure.

      Of course given that hipster part and the tattoo part that's not exactly likely.

    40. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Easy - they claim it works by detecting wavelengths using a green diode and photodetector.

      Anyone with any biology experience and light experience can tell you EVERYTHING will either absorb or reflect a certain wavelength.

      Apple's saying that BLOOD ONLY REFLECTS RED is bullshit.

      ~photobiology research director for international companies.

      Next idiot question, please.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    41. Re:Waitasecondhere... by pla · · Score: 1

      You assume this counts as a bug rather than a feature - As others have pointed out, Apple knew about this "problem", and decided to officially make lemons out of lemonade.

      Suffice it to say, the Walled Garden has no room for dirty tattooed heathens. No emulators, no system tools, no duplication of Apple functionality, and no colors.

    42. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      When was your term, two years ago? Try again when I did this from the early 2000s AND STILL PROVIDE REPAIR SERVICES TO THIS DAY, LET ALONE develop several of the sensors you fuckers use. (You're paying my patent portfolio!)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    43. Re:Waitasecondhere... by carlosap · · Score: 1

      Fitbit, polar loop and many other with green light suffer from this, so it's not only an apple thing. But with other vendors no body care as usual.

    44. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Swarley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Christ, you sounds like somebody who is butt hurt because they took a 3 week course for a technical certification and are insecure about how "expert" they are compared to people with actual education. Their description is accurate enough for marketing materials. By your own admission there is at least one green wavelength that blood cells absorb and at least one red one that they reflect. Therefore their information isn't incorrect and anyone with actual expertise in this area (like myself and others with this expertise have pointed out to you) can easily understand how they could make a sensor based on this phenomenon. It's not a new idea. These sensors have been around for decades and are used in hospitals routinely. It's basically a modified pulse oximeter, just since it uses only one wavelength instead of two it gets only the plethismograph information instead of the pleth AND oximetetry. Which is enough to determine a pulse rate.

    45. Re:Waitasecondhere... by jerk · · Score: 1

      He asked you to explain how it works, not how Apple is wrong in their explanation. Explain how it works, I'm genuinely curious. And please, feel free to dumb it down for my idiot brain; be as condescending as you like.

    46. Re:Waitasecondhere... by narcc · · Score: 1

      That's not even a little bit true.

    47. Re:Waitasecondhere... by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      Some people like to browse a site long before summoning the nerve to actually make an account and post. Or, perhaps, is it possible that I forgot the password I had used for my 4 digit UID account?

      What's funny is that my previous comment talked about the silliness of taking something on the internet at face value, with no thought or concern about extenuating circumstances that may explain why something appears the way it does.

      Oh well, off topic rant over.

    48. Re:Waitasecondhere... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      It's Apple. The whole POINT of the thing is that you don't have to RTFM.

      You don't have to RTFM to use the watch. That doesn't mean that there are no conditions which may cause problems with a product. To hold Apple to such a standard is ludicrous and silly. That's like saying D-Link, Netgear, and Cisco should design wireless routers that "just work" under all conditions like through 2 feet of cinder-block walls and never ever experience any sort of EM interference. Instead they have to explain that in a manual about these problems? Obviously they are all shoddy products by your standard.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    49. Re:Waitasecondhere... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Apple's saying that BLOOD ONLY REFLECTS RED is bullshit.

      Agreed, but I think you're being pedantic. Blood reflects mostly red and I assume that is how they use it.

    50. Re:Waitasecondhere... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Apple works purely on fucking bullshit marketing

      I thought this was obvious by the time the iMac was released, and Jobs' job had become a hundred times more important to the company than Woz's.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    51. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Outside of Portland, what percentage of the population has full sleeve tattoos? 1 in 10,000, maybe? I'm not asking to be funny; except for in very certain cities, those are almost unseen. Even working in San Francisco I see very, very few. Oh, there are lots of smaller tattoos, but sleeves are unusual.

      I'll bet more people are sensitive to the materials used to make the watch than are unable to use it because of their ink. That's not Apple's fault or a flaw in the watch, though: no one product can be useful to everyone.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    52. Re:Waitasecondhere... by cusco · · Score: 1

      You're not saying that the average hipster will actually read "that part", or much of anything else besides Twitter, are you? Hope not, at least my observation of them is that a tweet is about the maximum their attention span will handle.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    53. Re:Waitasecondhere... by cusco · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't live in Seattle, Portland, New York or San Francisco. I see bankers here with tattoos.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    54. Re:Waitasecondhere... by cusco · · Score: 1

      So this was a known issue with the technology that Apple was either ignorant of, or ignored? Guess I'm not surprised, they have a tendency to go into an existing market with the attitude that they are somehow "pioneers", and no one else in the world knows anything.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    55. Re:Waitasecondhere... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      OMG, a brief product description from a consumer electronics company made a simplification in it's marketing materials that is all but pedantically true!

    56. Re:Waitasecondhere... by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Precisely. If I had ink covering my wrist, I would definitely read the watch's promotional material to see what technology is being used in that sensor. And once I determined it was optical, I sure as hell wouldn't buy one without a test-drive. The same for any off-nominal physical condition--it's the responsibility of the individual to see if the equipment functions in the presence of their physical variation. If you were one of the people whose dental work causes them to hear radio signals, would you buy a Bluetooth headset without trying it?

      What I *do* have is quite hairy arms, I'm concerned enough about the pulse sensor working that I'm not even thinking about one of these watches until they're common enough to try on without an appointment (that, and since it's Apple, version 2.0 will be 25% cheaper and have 25% more features).

    57. Re:Waitasecondhere... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Not being able to get a heart rate reading from an Apple Watch won't kill you.

      However, you should google "Ford Pinto" sometime.

    58. Re:Waitasecondhere... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The fact that there's a technical issue isn't what matters. What matters is that they apparently either didn't think to test it, or didn't warn purchasers that it might be an issue.

      I'm not an apple fanboy, but the real fact is that most people don't read warnings anyway (even if they had been given, which they clearly weren't).

      For a limited time, Apple should just give refunds to people with tattoos on their wrists. It's not like that many people are going to qualify. Or if those people don't want a refund, they could just disable the wrist detection function and forget about using the heart monitoring and watch apple pay. Let's not pretend that this watch is anything more than a superfluous gadget, a wealth status symbol, or a fashion accessory.

      An Apple Watch support page does refer to potential disruption to heart rate monitoring caused by inked skin, however it fails to mention further interference with other key functions. “Permanent or temporary changes to your skin, such as some tattoos, can also impact heart rate sensor performance. The ink, pattern, and saturation of some tattoos can block light from the sensor, making it difficult to get reliable readings,” it reads.

      The unlock wrist detection function can be turned off, however this also disables Apple Pay.

      People with tattoos have many more things to worry about than an Apple watch anyway.

      It's really the tattoo parlors that should have warnings and disclaimer forms that clients should sign.

    59. Re:Waitasecondhere... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Or, considering where on the body a watch is worn, Apple just figured that people who got their tattoos in prison are not their target market.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    60. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Who would think to test for something like that? Is tattoo compatibility even a thing? I guess it is now.

      Apple should offer refunds and... yeah, that's probably pretty much it.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    61. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " Their description is accurate enough for marketing materials"

      It is still wholly inaccurate and misleading no matter how you try to say it.

      *YOU* sound like one of those LED grow light manufacturers - only say enough to get attention, and not enough to explain the concept fully, thus getting idiots to buy on a misleading statement.

      BTW, since you seem to not keep up with technology - we've got pulse-oximeters that don't even use light. That's OLD TECH. Catch up with the times, and maybe my patent portfolio while you're at it.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    62. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Eloking · · Score: 1

      You're not saying that the average hipster will actually read "that part", or much of anything else besides Twitter, are you? Hope not, at least my observation of them is that a tweet is about the maximum their attention span will handle.

      Absolutly not. As another ./er pointed out, Apple either hided that problem for the lauch or didn't do much research on the matter. I'm sure +99.9% of all Apple watch buyer were not aware the heart sensor might not work if you have a tattoo on that part until this news came out (granted the % of the population with a tattoo on the wrist is low, but still). And since I've learned this on /. only so far, I'm also sure that +99.8% are still not aware of it.

      --
      Elok
    63. Re:Waitasecondhere... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      From your own god damn wayback machine link:

      Even under ideal conditions, Apple Watch may not be able to get a reliable heart rate reading every time for everybody. And for a small percentage of users, various factors may make it impossible to get any heart rate reading at all.

      So they just added another point of detail. It clearly says that it won't work for some people, and apparently people with wrist tattoos are included in that set. Try again, yourself.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    64. Re:Waitasecondhere... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because a god damn watch not being able to read your heart rate is absolutely equal to products that kill people, and products that have actual component failures that already result in returns and exchanges.

      Hyperbole much?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    65. Re:Waitasecondhere... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Mine is a really high number too because I made a new account after forgetting my password on an account that was tied to an email I no longer had. Anyway they remade Mr. Peabody and Sherman last year so the younger crowd may know about the Wayback Machine.

    66. Re:Waitasecondhere... by zieroh · · Score: 1

      Which means if they use 540nm green LEDs whereas blood typically reflects 560 nm (proven) then they just fucked themselves.

      Go to an actual school for this, please.

      In school, we call that "pedantic". I colloquial terms, we just call it "missing the forest for the trees".

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    67. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Anyone who can afford an Apple Watch can also afford a new bionic iArm.

    68. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I hate how C always ruins a good fight just as it gets interesting.

    69. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even if they thought about it, how many users does it affect? Many companies, not just Apple, are very happy to ignore 10% of the potential market base because it costs too much to make it perfect for everyone. If someone is angry about being left out of some luxury consumer product, then join the club with all the other groups being left out of some product or other. It happens. Return the overpriced bauble for a refund.

    70. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I can't search for anything. I used to do + and -, it was the standard for search engines and no one had to learn SQL or regular expressions. Knowing !keyword is completely news to me. I had just given up on search engines being even moderately helpful, as there is no "help" page anymore to explain how to do smarter searches anymore.

      I presume this is just some SQL-like parsing of the search terms, as it would be insanely stupid to have the search engine accept pure SQL and pass it unhindered down to the guts of the back office.

    71. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But this ruins the human nature element of some underclass being oppressed by a huge uncaring corporation. Just the sheer horror of some people being unable to get their apple watch to work should shock us into sending money to the Red Cross lest they be forced to do without.

    72. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why should they care though? The cost to make a version that works for everyone probably greatly exceeds the small additional revenue they'd get. This is not a matter of discriminating against an oppressed class of people, or denying a vital service, or even denying a useful service. It's a fricking fashion accessory!

    73. Re:Waitasecondhere... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Don't be so angry. This is just the internet. Nobody's awarding points. And if they are, they don't really matter.

    74. Re:Waitasecondhere... by jcr · · Score: 1

      When I worked as an Apple repair tech, two out of every three machines off the line would fail and would require immediate refurbishing.

      Bullshit. That kind of failure rate would have put them out of business.

      I can almost guarantee you that Apple does jack shit for actual product testing

      As it happens, I worked in Apple's Hardware Test Engineering group shortly after the iPad shipped, and I know first-hand that you're full of shit.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    75. Re:Waitasecondhere... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Gee, what does your wife, Morgan Fairchild, have to say about this?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    76. Re:Waitasecondhere... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Those cases are about intrinsically faulty products. In the watch case it's about incompatibility with certain carbon units due to unapproved third-party modifications.

      You of all people ought to understand the difference.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    77. Re:Waitasecondhere... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      In terms of percentages, the GM switch was a far lower percentage failure rate - and it can be argued that the switches were abused by people putting a wad of keys and remotes on the key chain, something that wasn't done in the past and still doesn't make sense today. The design worked fine for years until this recent trend of having a ton of keys for everything, several remotes, a laser pointer, a usb fob, a mini flashlight, a few RFID devices, and a swiss army knife all on the ring.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    78. Re:Waitasecondhere... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The GM cylinder problem was due to people overloading their keyrings with all sorts of extra junk, like laser pointers, mini flashlights, 2-3 remotes, etc. That comes under abuse.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    79. Re:Waitasecondhere... by doconnor · · Score: 1

      So the watch won't work on carbon based life-forms either...?

    80. Re:Waitasecondhere... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The original design was not faulty - it worked fine for years, until people's habits changed to carrying so much junk on their keychains. It would be the same as if people, instead of just hanging a pair of fuzzy dice from their interior rear-view mirror started hanging their purse or pack-sack from it and complaining that it broke off after a bump.

      We have way too many common-sense fails nowadays, such as "This plastic bag is not a toy" and "Objects in mirror are closer than they seem" and "6PCS Precision screwdriver set not to be inserted into penis" and "Do not eat Ipod shuffle" (found on apple's website) and "Do not use for personal hygiene" (on Scrubbing Bubbles Fresh Brush) and many many more.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  3. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you're wearing it wrong

    1. Re:obligatory by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Jobs: "You got the wrong tattoo"

    2. Re:obligatory by mjwx · · Score: 1

      you're wearing it wrong

      You're inked wrong.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  4. Image change by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple is trying to move away from being perceived as the hardware of choice of nose-ringed tattoo-sleeved hipsters. This ink incompatibility is not a bug but a feature.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Image change by sls1j · · Score: 1

      So when was the Apple iNoMoreTatto coming out?

    2. Re:Image change by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Now-a-days, they're the choice of old people.

  5. Re:tatoogate by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 2

    Now I have reason to get one.

    what? a tat(too) or some tat (i.e. an Apple watch)?

  6. First World problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Looks like your mother was right. You will regret that tattoo some day down the line.

    1. Re:First World problems by g0bshiTe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have tattoos.

      Tattoo from younger days...$200
      Won't purchase Apple watch due to ink incompatibility...Saved $10,000
      Sticking it to MegaCorp...Priceless

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:First World problems by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't have a tattoo. Saved $200
      Not buying an iWatch Saved 10,000
      Sticking to nobody, just living my life ... Priceless!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:First World problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buy the $350 version?!

      Do I *look* poor, fam?

    4. Re:First World problems by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      How are you "sticking it to megacorp"? They look at your tattoo and fedora (or perpetually-worn knit cap)and dismiss you as a hipster doofus. That's really sticking it to them alright.

    5. Re:First World problems by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      My arms are worth...uh, about 7x what an Apple watch Sport costs (alternately, I could afford one steel Apple watch for each arm for what I paid for each of my sleeves). $200 isn't much tattoo. In fact, that was 1h20m at my artist's rates.

    6. Re:First World problems by cusco · · Score: 1

      I've been wearing wide-brim fedoras since 1978, I'm not likely to be mistaken for a hipster (a doofus, on the other hand . . .)

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re:First World problems by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      So you're saying you were wearing retro fedoras since before fedoras were retro?

    8. Re:First World problems by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      He was being ironic before irony was cool.

  7. Obviously product testing... by jd2112 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Didn't include Apple Store employees.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  8. A subset of first-world problems... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...hipster tragedy*:

    "Oh no, my trendy tattoo is interfering with my Apple Smart watch! What ever will I do?"

    *also called comedy by the rest of us.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:A subset of first-world problems... by fisted · · Score: 2

      Irony is when the Apple watch survives the fall and starts working once the wrist starts to decompose

    2. Re:A subset of first-world problems... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      ...hipster tragedy*:

      "Oh no, my trendy tattoo is interfering with my Apple Smart watch! What ever will I do?"

      *also called comedy by the rest of us.

      I'd call it irony.

      They threw away their watches because the iPhone freed them from wearing it and got sleeves because it was trendy to limit their employment options for the rest of their lives.

      The irony is that a new trendy thing can only be worn by people who probably think tattoos are lame and don't really care about being an early iMustGetTheLatestTrendyAppleThing adopter. They're probably thinking 'my tattoos aren't so trendy anymore and it's all Apples fault because iWant an iWatch`.

      Now if I could use a voice recognition system on it to link with a bash shell and actually want to spend that much money on a first generation device then this would actually be a selling point. Fortunately idon'tCareAbout iWatch or iTattoos.

      The irony is actually delicious from many perspectives. I shall savour it!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  9. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Hussman32 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you've ever been to the Apple campus, you'll find there is not a shortage of tattoos.

    --
    "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
  10. the $10,000 version has MORE problems. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Im sure fellow readers are concerned about the $10,000 version of the apple watch, and as an early adopter I am truly livid. If the watch comes into contact with my tattoo of the spirit of extacy riding a diamond into tattooine astride a golden dove the sensors stop working entirely. The watch is also difficult to locate as im sure most people have undoubtedly found out. I had to search all five bedrooms on the yacht just to find the darn thing! Also the watch has difficulty determining if or when I am wearing the rare jade oriental pendant of everlasting immortality, and just last weekend I had to buy a new one after I bumped into the caviar chafing dish and spilled lemon rochette truffle remoulade on the band.

    Its not that apple doesnt make an excellent product, they truly do! But I for one am getting tired of having to take the same bently to the same helicopter every other week to send my manservant into the apple "store" as the common people call it to have it replaced. A man can only tolerate so much car champagne before the aftertaste of the lox comingling with the alsace vintage becomes too much to bear.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  11. Not every tattoo by sansprivacy · · Score: 1

    Not all tattoo inks are created equal. Many practitioners use ink from botanical sources. I didn't know tattoos were a hipster thing. I thought they were more into beards, cutoff shorts, and bicycles?

    1. Re:Not every tattoo by guruevi · · Score: 1

      That and tattoo sleeves. And Apple told them about it on the website...

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Not every tattoo by g0bshiTe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in the day tattoos were the 1%'ers now tattoos are the 99%'ers.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Not every tattoo by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I didn't know tattoos were a hipster thing

      Then one might suggest you either live under a rock, or have no contact with tattoos.

      Nowadays the kiddies with the stretched ears get their sleeves as their first tattoos, instead of getting a bunch of smaller ones first.

      The sleeve tattoo is very much now a hipster thing. In some ways, so is the neck tattoo.

      Hell, your average barrista seems to be required to have stretched lobes, dreads, and full sleeves ... even if they don't have any other tattoos.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Not every tattoo by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'll be bangin' 18 year olds when I'm 40, because the fad will finally be over and I can get some women whose skin doesn't have blue and black blotches like the fucking bubonic plague all over it.

      Tattoos look nice, but they don't look nice on your body. It's like grabbing piles of cool shit and plastering it all together in a house: you have the ugliest fucking house in existence. If you would learn to theme it properly, you'd get a nice interior design. Problem: tattoos don't make for a nice body design; they're a blotch on your body. They make for nice pictures and fantastic decals on your car.

    5. Re:Not every tattoo by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Back in the day tattoos were the 1%'ers.

      I'm sure that "back in the days" trailer trash accounted for more than 1%.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Not every tattoo by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      And Apple fixed their website yesterday.

      '

      FTFY

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:Not every tattoo by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      very few tats look good. Most are exactly as you describe, blotches. Half the time, you can't tell WTF the tat was supposed to be. Its cool, until its not. Then it is just permanent reminder how suggestible you are. On the plus side, you can tell who are the sheeple this way.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Not every tattoo by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      People have been tattooing for thousands of years

      Argument: Primitives will distinguish their primitive brains and retarded evolution via tattoos.

      Counter-argument: ... none.

    9. Re:Not every tattoo by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Wow, you have seriously just sunk as low as "I know you are but what am I".

      Congratulations on reaching the bottom of erudite discussion while simultaneously being a condescending ass.

      I bet your mom is proud!

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Not every tattoo by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You pulled an appeal to tradition first. I made a brief summary of loincloth-wearing tribal man with witchdoctors and bones in their noses to complete the picture. Did you honestly think a well-known logical fallacy was a good argument?

    11. Re:Not every tattoo by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      You seem to think you've scored points for your witty repartee.

      In respond to you saying "yarg, teh tattoos are tech stupid because I said so", I said:

      People have been tattooing for thousands of years, it's not going to stop because you don't like them.

      Which is a statement of fact, not a logical fallacy. Because the world isn't going to stop getting tattooed because you complain.

      Then you doubled down on the "yarg, teh tattoos are for the sux0rs". And then you idiotically accuse me of a logical fallacy.

      But, hey, maybe you simply don't understand what a logical fallacy is. Or maybe you're just so convinced of your own awesome you're unaware of your own stupid.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:Not every tattoo by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Well, people have been getting STDs for thousands of years, too.

    13. Re:Not every tattoo by cusco · · Score: 1

      You're also too dumb to figure out how to create and log into a SlashDot account, so the rest of us really don't give a flying fuck about your opinion.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    14. Re:Not every tattoo by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Not all tattoo inks are created equal. Many practitioners use ink from botanical sources.

      Obviously, non-GMO botanical sources, otherwise they're not hipster enough.

      Somewhere at a Chipotle, there's a hipster who can't order his non-GMO burrito with his Apple watch, because his tattoo is interfering with the security features. Oh, the irony.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    15. Re:Not every tattoo by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn, sonny.

      (Thinks tattoos can be ugly or beautiful, just like the people wearing them.)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  12. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    This is exactly my problem with Apple and many other product designers. Phone screens that don't work with gloves. Phones that aren't waterproof. Phones that can't have the storage upgraded or battery replaced. Self driving cars that can't handle rain and snow. There's a lot of products out there that only work in very specific conditions and that fail when used outside the very narrow range in which they were tested.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  13. Re:Who could have guessed ? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Not sure about that, all the Apple Stores I've been in there was no shortage of full sleeved tattooed clerks.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  14. Early Adopter by whistlepig · · Score: 1

    Hasn't it always been known that early adopters are exposed to some risk? Yup, you can pay a lot of money to be the first person with a new gadget, but you are paying a premium to be a guinea pig and reinforcing that there is a market where people pay a lot of money to be a guinea pig. (Yes, Apple probably should have considered tattooed skin in their testing.)

    1. Re:Early Adopter by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Early adopter is just another term for beta tester. Good thing people figured this out so Apple can either fix it or just document as an unintentional feature for when the real version is released in another year or two.

  15. Re:Apple can't help stupid people by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    I wonder, did you ever get braces? Have your wisdom teeth pulled?

    "Apple can't possibly design it to work with people's wrists that fall outside of normality" you mean like a fat ass not being able to fit in a single airplane seat?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  16. No way! by rail2rail · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who could have possibly predicted your sleeve tattoo would limit your options later in life??

    1. Re:No way! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I sense a great disturbance in the force. As if thousands of hipsters suddenly apologised to their mothers and told them they were right. And then laughter.

  17. What is the obsession with tattoos... by linebackn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ick. I've never understood why people get tattoos. While I can respect the idea of using the human body as a canvas for art, it just doesn't come across as such. Perhaps it is just the way my brain is wired, when I see a tattoo my brain instinctively registers it as "damage" and that the person may be injured or ill. Certainly others must have the same instinctive reaction, yet it seems even more people are doing that these days.

    1. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why they don't. It is a form of art and expression. I do have my limits as to what I would personally do (no sleeves, neck, face/head, etc.), but I enjoy seeing them on others.

    2. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Its just another fashion trend for sheeple. Most of the idiots getting covered in tattoos right now, in 20 years time - when they look about as trendy as orange flared trousers and Maori Dragon on their arm with all the baggy skin now looks like he ate too many goats and fell down the mountain hitting every boulder on the way down - will be the ones whining that they can't afford the laser treatment to have them removed.

    3. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      I think tattoos are stupid. That's why I don't have any. I can say this for a lot of things other people like. I don't understand why someone would do it, but as long as nobody does it to me, I'm not bothered by it.

    4. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I look at the whole human body as an aesthetic. I'm not usually looking at women in a sexual way at first glance; the first things I notice are body shape, skin tone consistency (blotchy and ragged or smooth and soft?), hair, and so forth. I see a complete picture, a canvas I guess you could say, all these elements brought together to express the physical state of a person; it even goes so far as exactly how they move, what expressions they show, and, of course, what they're wearing.

      After taking all that in, I decide what category of attractiveness she falls into, if she's sexually attractive, if she's intimidating, or whatnot. All the normal stuff. You'd be surprised how much sexual attraction falls squarely on a good smile, a good voice, body movement, the emotional regard of personality (yes, even for a sociopath with no real empathy). The first look is to see what image I'm looking at, how it flows, and how visually pleasing it is; the second is to see how I feel about it, if I want it, and what I want it for.

      Tattoos are art. Unfortunately, they're the kind of art you get by printing out RWBY fanart and gluing it into the middle of a Van Gogh: maybe the artist has really good lines and anatomy, and the picture is really great, but it fucks up the Van Gogh.

    5. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there is a UID / age divider between Slashdotters who think positively vs. negatively about tattoos. It's been fun reading about the rather disparate views here. Personally, I would agree with you (in contrast to my usual disagreements about your politics) - it's a nice concept that rarely comes across as a net gain for the individual. I've seen a few tattoos that actually look good on the person, mostly it is a complete fail.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I got my first tattoo after my mother passed, then another a month later when my aunt passed, then my third after my father passed about 6 months after that. They all have deep meaning to me, and I enjoy them. They are also kind of addicting once you get started, and the good artists aren't cheap. For now they are hidden by my polos, but I'm thinking of a move down to one forearm. One pair of the breathable Nike sleeves and that will be hidden when I'm at work, although I doubt it's an issue unless I change jobs. If I make it to an age where my skin sags and I'm no longer in shape, then I'm pretty sure I won't care what they look like, so that part is covered.

    7. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      4-digit UID, just under 40, two half-sleeves. :)

    8. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by rizole · · Score: 1

      Tats and piercing can look good done right but there's a point wherethay get so big/badly done, that you don't see the person anymore, you see the ink and metal, it gets in the way. It's the same with clothes but when somebody wears something that looks just bad on them they can change. There's even a feedback loop there so peoples dress sense often improves with age. Once you've got a 5 inch hole in your earlobe or stars across your chest it's often too late. And if you already look crap why not commit to it? Embrace the shite and go for broke? I think that's why a lot of ink and piercings can end up looking like damage.

    9. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Was at a party one time where a skinhead was showing off his new eagle tat on his shaved head. When asked why he chose there he rather smugly said, "When I want to have kids and get a better job I can just grow my hair and no one will know." An acquaintance nearby started laughing hysterically, and when she calmed down enough to talk she said, "You idiot, both your grandfathers are bald and started losing their hair in their thirties. It's hereditary."

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    10. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is just the way my brain is wired, when I see a tattoo my brain instinctively registers it as "damage" and that the person may be injured or ill. Certainly others must have the same instinctive reaction, yet it seems even more people are doing that these days.

      Trypophobia is a real thing, so it isn't far off to imagine the sight of a tattoo evoking a similar reaction in some people.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    11. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      4-digit UID, just over 40, no tats but I've thought about it. I've never considered anything massive like a sleeve before because I don't think it'd look good on me, but I couldn't care less if other people have them.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    12. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      In some cultures, tattoos and body modifications are considered an assault on god's temple (your body). Although it's an instinct with me, more than learned behavior, I subconsciously wonder why people with tattoos hate themselves so much they cover their body with writing (or puncture wounds, or metal placed in private places). You can express your individuality in a number of ways, why do it to your body in such an irreversible manner?

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    13. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      It's also entirely possible that the older UIDs have seen more tattoos for longer, and see how they begin to look....ragged or dated...after a period of time.
      Plus, the fact that they ( Like me) may remember almost getting some tattoo bit of idiocy in college and are thoroughly grateful they never went through with it.
      For me, it would have been the "Milk and Cheese" dueling shoulder pieces. Because one's a carton of hate and the other's a wedge of spite.

    14. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      That the best you could come up with?

    15. Re:What is the obsession with tattoos... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      It's a half-sleeve on each arm, which is distinguished from having a single full-sleeve. :)

  18. The lesson by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

    If you want a tattoo on your wrist, either put it on the wrist where you wouldn't wear a watch, or go to some competent tattoo artist who will be able to advise you what kind of ink will affect your skin more or and which one will affect it less; consider that the Apple Watch is just the start of wearing things around your wrist. .

    1. Re:The lesson by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      consider that the Apple Watch is just the start of wearing things around your wrist. .

      And here I thought the cellphone was the END of wearing things around my wrist....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:The lesson by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      If you want a tattoo on your wrist, either put it on the wrist where you wouldn't wear a watch [...]

      But I don't need a watch! I've got a phone!

    3. Re:The lesson by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, I have a wrist tattoo but on the opposite one I wear a watch on, for that exact reason -- at the time I got it, I usually wore a watch. =) No sense in covering it up.

  19. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    As noted by others (just copying the link);
    https://support.apple.com/en-u...
    Just a case of uninformed, self-entitled hipsters (is there any other kind of hipster?).

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  20. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    If companies had to list everything that's not possible with their products, everything would come with enough books to fill an olympic swimming pool.

    Did you know you can't wear the Apple watch if you don't have arms?

  21. Re:Apple can't help stupid people by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Are some people planning on wearing them in their mouths then?

  22. The Watch Nazi by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    You have tattoos? No soup for you!

    NEXT!

  23. Re:Apple can't help stupid people by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Aren't braces a temporary project to permanently make your teeth normal? Don't you have wisdom teeth pulled to make a minor deviation for the purpose of correcting a major one?

  24. Again? by spiritplumber · · Score: 1, Troll

    Another Apple fail that everyone will make excuses for.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    1. Re:Again? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Another hipster fail that everyone will blame Apple for.

      FTFY

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  25. Re:Da Plane! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Smiles everyone, smiles!

  26. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    Apple provides a link on the very front product page labeled "Learn about the Apple Watch heart rate sensor, its accuracy and limitations", which then points to a page that specifically mentions the tattoo issue. NatasRevol pointed this page out, but I noticed it was a support page, and wondered how prominently it was displayed. As it turns out, it's very easy to find that page and information.

    Permanent or temporary changes to your skin, such as some tattoos, can also impact heart rate sensor performance. The ink, pattern, and saturation of some tattoos can block light from the sensor, making it difficult to get reliable readings.

    A legitimate question is, of course, how long that link and information has been there. If it just recently went up, then it's bad on Apple. If it's been like that since before preorders were taken, then maybe people should have actually read about what they were purchasing.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  27. so you look creepy over 40 by peter303 · · Score: 1

    when the skin begins to sag

  28. Apple flaw? by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    over the newly discovered Apple flaw.

    How is it Apples fault your body contains a deposit of metallic pigments where there should be none?

    Seems more like a defect in the wearer to me.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Apple flaw? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I doubt most people who bought the watch had enough understanding of how it works to know that a tattoo would interfere with it. Apparently neither did Apple, since they only added the note about the tattoo issue to their site yesterday. The failure is the lack of testing and failure to warn about this limitation of the product.

      I think reasonably a lay person could not be expected to have predicted this. People with tattoos being incompatible with common medical sensors is not a thing. It's reasonable to expect the manufacturer to test it. Also, other smart watches with pulse sensors don't see to have this problem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Apple flaw? by carlosap · · Score: 1

      All other vendors with green lights has this problem, i.e. fitbit, polar loop etc.

    3. Re:Apple flaw? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That just makes it worse, if it was a known problem of the technology that they failed to mention...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  29. Re:Who could have guessed ? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Not sure about that, all the Apple Stores I've been in there was no shortage of full sleeved tattooed clerks.

    Wow..where do you live?

    I mean, hell, I live in New Orleans...where pretty much ANYTHING goes, and I rarely see people with that much tattoo work done on them.

    Most people that could afford an iWatch are gonna have 'real' jobs...and you generally can't be all painted up from head to toe, with piercings galore and work in an office, etc.

    So, even in a town where wild and different is the norm...folks with enough tattoos to make it in a circus show are very much in the minority. And like I said, generally...those folks are not the market for an expensive toy like the iWatch.

    I've never seen any of the Apple Store employees here with any noticeable ink on them.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  30. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by NinePenny · · Score: 1

    One time, I had ice cream that was TOO cold! I mean really, the ice cream company was basically negligent for not taking into account the ambient temperature of the room I was sitting in.
     

  31. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    Sure you can - you just need to get the iAnkleBracelet.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  32. hiptards by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    I heard it doesn't work through bandaids either.

    from apple's website:

    What else affects your reading?
    Many factors can affect the performance of the Apple Watch heart rate sensor. Skin perfusion is one. A fancy way of describing how much blood flows through your skin, skin perfusion varies significantly from person to person and can also be impacted by the environment. If you’re exercising in the cold, for example, the skin perfusion in your wrist may be too low for the heart rate sensor to get a reading.
    Motion is another factor that can affect the heart rate sensor. Rhythmic movements, such as running or cycling, give better results compared to irregular movements, like tennis or boxing.
    Permanent or temporary changes to your skin, such as some tattoos, can also impact heart rate sensor performance. The ink, pattern, and saturation of some tattoos can block light from the sensor, making it difficult to get reliable readings.
    If you’re not able to get a consistent reading because of any of these factors, you can connect your Apple Watch wirelessly to external heart rate monitors such as Bluetooth chest straps.
    Heart rate is just one of many factors that Apple Watch uses to measure your activity and exercise. Depending on your workout, it selects the most appropriate inputs for that activity. For example, when you’re running indoors, it also uses the accelerometer. When you’re cycling outdoors, it uses the GPS in your iPhone. And even when you’re not in a dedicated workout, it tracks how much you move each day. So Apple Watch can give you the information — and the motivation — to improve your fitness and your health.

    https://support.apple.com/en-u...

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  33. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    And how many of those tattooed people have their tattoo right on their lower arm/wrist where it would interfere with the watch?

    I bet it's a pretty small percentage of the already small(ish) percentage of Apple employees who have tattoos in the first place.

  34. You're an idiot. by Brannon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They were dumbing down the explanation to make it understandable, there's obviously enough of an absorbtion difference to be detectable--that's all that matters.

    Maybe stop investing so much of your self-worth into your choice of consumer electronics and then you won't feel the need to invent lame excuses (like bullshit marketing) for why someone else's choice is flawed.

  35. How about other watches/fitness trackers? by Imazalil · · Score: 2

    So, now that we're all frothing at the mouth and getting our pitchforks, has anyone bothered to check if other smart watches or fitness trackers have same issues or it's only Apple's?

    Just curious if this is something endemic to the entire category or only the technology Apple used in their watch.

    1. Re:How about other watches/fitness trackers? by cusco · · Score: 1

      It's the color of LED that they use in the sensors. This has been a known issue since the FitBit hit the market with green LEDs a couple of years ago. Other smart watch vendors, like Samsung, learned the lesson and used other colors so have no problem. Apple, being Apple, seems to have decided that they were somehow "pioneers" in this market and didn't bother to do any actual research on what works for existing devices.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:How about other watches/fitness trackers? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      It's the color of LED that they use in the sensors. This has been a known issue since the FitBit hit the market with green LEDs a couple of years ago. Other smart watch vendors, like Samsung, learned the lesson and used other colors so have no problem. Apple, being Apple, seems to have decided that they were somehow "pioneers" in this market and didn't bother to do any actual research on what works for existing devices.

      It's the color of LED that they use in the sensors. This has been a known issue since the FitBit hit the market with green LEDs a couple of years ago. Other smart watch vendors, like Samsung, learned the lesson and used other colors so have no problem.

      If you tattoo your fingers, it will interfere with pulse ox devices. This is well known in the medical community. They generally work around it by using a different model and clipping it to your ear, scrotum, or some other place that doesn't have ink.

      If you have inked yourself all over, they insert an optical catheter to take the measurements directly, or resort to semi-frequent blood draws.

      This is what you get when you integrate an off-the shelf medical sensor into a wearable device not intended or certified to do medical things, and then don't have alternatives when someone has managed to screw with the ability of the sensor to operate by decorating themselves like a Christmas tree.

    3. Re:How about other watches/fitness trackers? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      So, now that we're all frothing at the mouth and getting our pitchforks, has anyone bothered to check if other smart watches or fitness trackers have same issues or it's only Apple's?

      Just curious if this is something endemic to the entire category or only the technology Apple used in their watch.

      Nope, it's just Apple.

      Both the Samsung and Fitbit products dont have the same issue. Not sure about the Motorola watch, but I'd say its a safe bet that it's not happening there either.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  36. That's obviously made-up bullshit by Brannon · · Score: 2

    If 2 out of 3 Apple products failed then we probably would have heard about that by now.

    1. Re:That's obviously made-up bullshit by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, you wouldn't because those failures occur ON THE LINE DURING BENCH TESTING.

      It's like you don't understand how a technology company might work.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:That's obviously made-up bullshit by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "Apple does jack shit for actual product testing"

      "those failures occur ON THE LINE DURING BENCH TESTING"

      Hm perhaps during your time either as an Apple repair tech or an international photonics expert you were exposed to something cognitively detrimental?

    3. Re:That's obviously made-up bullshit by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You must not have much in the way of cognitive ability yourself.

      Apple does no testing. The companies that manufacture their products do the testing. Apple just slaps shit together and hopes it works.

      They also have pretty much zero quality controls. Getting an entire shipment of Apple logic boards from Guadalajara FILLED WITH SAND tends to put a damper on your repair quota.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:That's obviously made-up bullshit by jcr · · Score: 1

      Apple does no testing.

      What's your next guess, sunshine?

      Apple is testing their products all the time, and they don't sample, either. Every unit passes every test before it gets out of the factory.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  37. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    That was recently update to include the bit about the tattoos http://web.archive.org/web/201...

    of course if you read how the sensor works you would know that scarring, discoloration of the skin, and tattoos would all be a possible problem it just wasn't spelled out for the masses.

  38. You should start a company and do it better. by Brannon · · Score: 1

    You seem to have a solid handle on all the engineering & market challenges involved.

  39. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Khyber · · Score: 1, Informative

    As noted by FUCKING HISTORY you are absolutely full of shit, you apologist shill.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  40. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "Did you know you can't wear the Apple watch if you don't have arms?"

    Dunno, my ankles seem to fit this wristband just fine.

    Oh, wait, too stupid to think critically.

    Did you know most /. posters simply don't have common sense, despite their supposed education?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  41. Hilarious! by scotts13 · · Score: 1

    "Wah! I changed the wheels on my car and now the hubcaps I wanted to buy don't fit anymore! Somebody MAKE them make those hubcaps to fit a 13.5" Russian army surplus wheel!"

  42. Re:Who could have guessed ? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Ha. New Orleans must be losing it. Up here in unHipster Alaska you see quite a number of heavily tattooed folk carting around iPhones, iPads and various other iAccoutraments. These are typically working class folk - fisherman, lumberjacks (yes, we have them), cannery workers and such who happen to make a lot money (at least at times) and think that shinys are worthwhile expenditures. Yeah, it looks a bit, shall we say, different, to see some heavily muscled guy in beat up work clothes sipping a grande quadruple shot mocha and daintily tapping away at his MacBook Air. It is a very strange world at times.

    Now, it isn't obvious that this guy and his cute friends are the prototypical iWatch purchasers but I'll wager there is going to be some overlap here.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  43. Do you think Apple 'Geniuses' design new products? by Brannon · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's what they're doing when they disappear into the backroom for awhile.

  44. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    preorders began on april 10th

    The wayback machine on april 11th http://web.archive.org/web/201...

    The current page says it was last updated yesterday.

    From the description of how the sensor works you would think that scarring, skin discoloration, and tattoos could all be a problem but it was not spelled out. {maybe extremely hairy wrists too}

  45. Re:FSJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The sensors on the Apple Watch and other devices use specific color range of light to detect blood flow through the skin. The tattoo ink can block it. Yet another reason not to mark up one's body.

  46. Re:Who could have guessed ? by Nevynxxx · · Score: 1

    I work in an office, I wear a shirt to the wrist. It's none of my employers business what's under that shirt sleeve.

  47. Re:Who could have guessed ? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    The downtown Portland Apple store had heavily decorated employees. Of the ones I noticed, more had ink, piercings, and hair dye than did not. But that's downtown Portland, so probably not the best example, just happens to be the only one I've been in lately.

  48. Re:FSJ by hawguy · · Score: 2

    The sensors on the Apple Watch and other devices use specific color range of light to detect blood flow through the skin. The tattoo ink can block it.
    Yet another reason not to mark up one's body.

    I hardly think "Can't use an Apple Watch" ranks very highly on the list of reasons not to get a tattoo since there's such an easy workaround -- don't buy an apple watch.

  49. Re:Hey morons, learn what words mean. by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    No, hipsters still by popular items, they just do so ironically. Or something.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  50. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by ksheff · · Score: 1

    It's a simple problem. If the device doesn't work for you, send it back for a refund and find something that does. If they aren't accepting returns, then that's an example of crappy customer service.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  51. Apple products are for clean white skin only by Cito · · Score: 1

    If you read page 226 of the 1200 page EULA, its for whites only. They recommend cheaper Android watches for colored skin

  52. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    From the description of how the sensor works you would think that scarring, skin discoloration, and tattoos could all be a problem but it was not spelled out. {maybe extremely hairy wrists too}

    Good to know - thanks for checking that out. Wayback machine is awesome.

    Yeah, reading the description does pretty lead you to believe that a layer of ink under the skin seems pretty likely to interfere with those sensors, which are relying on color information (crazy, I didn't realized that's how it worked).

    One has to wonder about the ramifications for those with very dark skin. I suppose we'll hear about it if proves to be problematic. The tattoo issue... well, sucks for those who chose to get a tattoo. If the watch simply doesn't work as advertised on black wrists... that's a little more disturbing. Apple may have invented the world's first "racist" watch.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  53. Target Demographic by jmac_the_man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sucks for Apple especially since the target demographic for this product is poor decision makers, like people who get wrist tattoos or buy Apple stuff.

  54. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Did you know you can't wear the Apple watch if you don't have arms?

    I plan on wearing mine like a cock ring, just set it to vibrate and keep texting myself.

    Think that'll void the warranty?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  55. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    I would imagine it would work like laser hair removal the darker the skin, if there are tattoos, or any other blemishes it may not be a viable option.

  56. The Ongoing Scandal by flopsquad · · Score: 1

    We are in the midst of a decades-long scandal. It seems lazy people who evidently hate the English language have been appendin "-gate" at the end of pretty much anything that annoys or inconveniences them.

    I'm sure when you tell the Apple Store people their watch doesn't work on your tattooed wrist, they will take it back and issue a refund. You may have to spend 15 minutes doing that instead of picking out artisanal teapots or locally-sourced beard wax. Oh the horrors!

    #noteverythingisafuckinggate-gate

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  57. Solved! by Whiteox · · Score: 2

    Easy! Just get an Apple Watch tattoo. Problem solved.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  58. Pigments block light. News at 11! by sl3xd · · Score: 1

    In other news, hordes of hipsters realize to their horror that electronics aren't magical.

    It's never been a secret the Apple watch uses an optical sensor - if it's blocked by anything it won't work; it's just the nature of optical sensors...

    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    1. Re:Pigments block light. News at 11! by cusco · · Score: 1

      Optical sensors on most other smart watches don't have any problem, since they actually did some research and learned from other manufacturers that green LEDs are blocked. Some other colors seem fine, but a different sensor probably would have cost Apple an extra $0.45 per watch so they just ignored that inconvenient fact and assumed that the fanbois would buy it anyway. They're probably right.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:Pigments block light. News at 11! by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Green LED's provide more accurate heart rate monitoring.

      The watch already has infrared LED's and IR sensors in addition to green; the "extra $0.45 per watch" is baked in.

      Every engineer has to make a decision about where the point of diminishing returns lies for their design.

      For every additional LED and sensor they use, more power is consumed. Does it make sense to shorten battery life by x hours for everyone just so it functions better for y% more users?

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  59. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by cusco · · Score: 1

    Melanin is generally transparent to the frequencies used in these devices, so skin color doesn't make a difference. It's essentially the same technology as the little finger clamp they put on you in the hospital to measure pulse and blood oxygenation, and they work fine on people of all colors.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  60. Employable? by sdguero · · Score: 1

    How do they have money to buy an iwatch? Tattoos on hands and wrists seems like a great way to make yourself unemployable and eternally poor.

  61. Re:Who could have guessed ? by cusco · · Score: 1

    Are you sure Louisiana is a place where "anything goes"??? I guess you need to come to Seattle, where you'll meet bankers with neck tattoos and insurance executives with nose rings. Sorry, but New Orleans hasn't been avant guarde for decades.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  62. Oh the irony. by Holi · · Score: 1

    If you haven't noticed, Hipsters are pretty mainstream now.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:Oh the irony. by itzly · · Score: 1

      If you haven't noticed, Hipsters are pretty mainstream now.

      That's ironic.

    2. Re:Oh the irony. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The three people at work that have bought Apple Watches so far are all over 50. Is there an age limit on this hipster thing? They're also married with kids. Still hipsters?

      I just need to be clear on this point, so I can tell them one way or the other.

    3. Re:Oh the irony. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that must be it. The entire United States looks like Portland.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  63. Re:mom told you so by Fishchip · · Score: 1

    Actually, they're a great idea, they'll stop you from using an iWatch.

    Gosh, I love the back and forth in this thread.
    'People who get tattoos are sheeple!'
    'No, people who like Apple stuff are sheeple!'
    'No, you are!'
    'No, you are!'

  64. No flaw. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "sharing their disappointment over the newly discovered Apple flaw."

    They also don't get hired by banks and other serious businesses, it ain't a 'bank flaw'.
    It was just a bad idea to get a tattoo and now you pay for it.

    1. Re:No flaw. by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      The loan officer at my bank has a humming bird on the inside of her wrist and it is very visible when you hand her something or she hands you something. It's also small and very well done.

    2. Re:No flaw. by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      yes but not the bank's CEO. that's the difference between the have-nots and the haves.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    3. Re:No flaw. by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I've not met the CEO but I know a guy that owns a construction company with government contracts who has sleeves, I wouldn't compare him to the CEO of a major corp but but 6 bed 6 bath house with an extra 4 car garage full of sports cars surely isn't a have not.

  65. if you break the network, what do you expect? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    obviously the Apple domos in China and One Infinite Loop didn't have a stable of bikers and wearable art folks availiable to see if the watch worked right with those injected clays, metallics, and inorganic dyes strewn all across the bio-network. I doubt they'd have been able to work around it, either. breast implants are known to fuzz up mammograms and can hide tumors, as well as complicate angioplasty. muck up the network, don't expect clear signals.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  66. Re:How about... by hawguy · · Score: 1

    I hardly think "Can't use an Apple Watch" ranks very highly on the list of reasons not to get a tattoo since there's such an easy workaround -- don't buy an apple watch.

    How about "Emergency services personnel can't use a pulse oximetry device on your tattooed skin in order to save your life following a car accident"?

    The device that's being interfered with is a pretty standard non-invasive pulse ox device that happens to be built into the watch.

    Maybe the paramedics should use a standard finger pulse-ox meter instead of an iWatch.

  67. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by tlambert · · Score: 1

    This is exactly my problem with Apple and many other product designers.

    Yeah, most capacitive coupling (read as "nearly any touch sensitive device") doesn't work with gloves, unless they are specially made.

    It also doesn't work with artificial limbs, which I think is probably a more important issue.

    You can modify an artificial limb pretty trivially to make it work, just as you can modify a glove pretty trivially to make it work. I helped someone modify their Boch's artificial arms to allow them to use the touchpad on their IBM Thinkpad (also capacitively coupled). I declined to patent the modifications, and instead disclosed them into the public domain.

  68. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

    I have no idea on either, but I do know that they have a very liberal campus policy with regards to wardrobe, hair, etc. There is plenty of body art to be seen, not sure whether they work in design.

    --
    "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
  69. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    And as noted by others in reply to your note from others, your own fucking wayback machine link states:

    "Even under ideal conditions, Apple Watch may not be able to get a reliable heart rate reading every time for everybody. And for a small percentage of users, various factors may make it impossible to get any heart rate reading at all."

    Clearly, having a tattoo counts as one of the "various factors"

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  70. Re:How about... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    I've not seen many people tattoo the tips of their fingers. And I've never seen EMS use any other kind of device to take pulse ox readings. A full on hospital will still use a fingertip pulse ox reader for the ox, but will get the pulse from an EKG. EKGs are much more common now that they don't need paper and a printer, but store the reading digitally, which give instant feedback, as well as the ability to play back later.

    But even then, tattoos often have metal in the pigment,so would that change in conductivity mess up an EKG, given a large chest tattoo with iron in the pigment?

  71. Perspective is what you need by rsborg · · Score: 1

    For the tiny percent of people who have tattoos that cover all the way down, why would they waste money or resources trying to figure out that last barely 1 percent or less? That makes no sense from a business stand point, on the other hand I totally agree with you on they should have a warning for those people with tattoo. For most, there is still time to return the watch, stop being major cry babies, thats how you let companies know there product has problems, RETURN IT.

    So, GM shouldn't have fixed the ignition key problem because it affects even less than your "barely 1%"? And if a laptop design has barely 1% of cpus fail out of the box, that's okay? Or drugs or contaminated food shouldn't be recalled because it only affects barely 1%? Can you change your name from Anonymous Coward to Corporate Shill?

    So is the Apple Watch not working with wrist tattoos equivalent to a malfunctioning car, failing laptop, or or contaminated drugs/food? You call the GP commenter a shill. You sounds silly and shrill.

    If you have wrist tattoos (my guess is you don't) and the watch doesn't work for you return it. Get some perspective, and buy a Google Wear instead.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Perspective is what you need by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      My point was that this was a design process defect. Nowadays, a failure rate of less than 1% in a mass market consumer product isn't rocket science, and it should be even more true to a "premium" product.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Perspective is what you need by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What percent of the population has tattoos on their wrists that would interfere with the watch? I very rarely see one, but my experience is very likely not typical.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:Perspective is what you need by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Must be a significant amount, or we wouldn't hear so many complaints ... who knows - I don't get the whole tattoo thing ..

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Perspective is what you need by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      A relatively small number of people can make a lot of noise. If Apple has sold a million watches so far (which seems likely), and one person in a thousand has tattoos that interfere, that'd be a thousand people. On the net, a thousand people can seem like a multitude.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  72. Re:How about... by jblues · · Score: 1

    How about "Emergency services personnel can't use a pulse oximetry device on your tattooed skin in order to save your life following a car accident"?

    Don't most pulse oximeters work by shining a certain frequency of light through fingernails? You'd have to be tatooed under every fingernail - full hiptard level.

    Even in the absence of a suitable finger an earlobe, toe or penis should work nicely. (Well . . . not sure how effective the latter would be. Might have to disregard readings taken during sponge-bath time, when oxygen saturation goes up to about 350%)

    Also the thing about pulse oximetry: perfect accuracy is not required. Their benefit is that they are light, cheap and portable (in aluminum and space gray configurations, not gold) so can be used as an indicator that intensive care is required. They measure oxygen saturation, but are not effective at indicating respiratory acidosis, for example. Once in an intensive care setting, there's other ways to measure organ perfusion.

    DISCLAIMER: The above might be complete horse@#(&, as I'm not a doctor - just read medical encyclopedias from time to time ;)

    --
    If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
  73. Re:How about... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    How about "Emergency services personnel can't use a pulse oximetry device on your tattooed skin in order to save your life following a car accident"?

    The device that's being interfered with is a pretty standard non-invasive pulse ox device that happens to be built into the watch.

    Maybe the paramedics should use a standard finger pulse-ox meter instead of an iWatch.

    The iWatch is not a certified medical device. I am specifically talking about standard pulse ox on someone who has done something like this to their fingers:

    http://blog-cdn.tattoodo.com/w...

    If people are going to tattoo their wrists and faces, they are sure as hell going to do their fingers.

  74. Re:How about... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    How about "Emergency services personnel can't use a pulse oximetry device on your tattooed skin in order to save your life following a car accident"?

    Don't most pulse oximeters work by shining a certain frequency of light through fingernails?

    No. They shine through the pad of the fingertip to the blood vessels there. Otherwise they would not work on people wearing nail polish.

  75. Re:Straitlaced Engineers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Does extending the strap count as a modification?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  76. So wtf are you complaining about? by Brannon · · Score: 1

    By your own admission Apple does test the products before they reach customers. Your original post claimed that they didn't--obviously that post was wrong.

  77. You're wearing it wrong by rogerbly · · Score: 1

    You're wearing it wrong.

  78. Re:How about... by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

    Just had a vision of someone with an iron pigment tattoo getting into an MRI machine...

  79. Re:How about... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    You can google it. The "result" is a minor burn caused by the heating from the MRI. That's all, and it's not even consistent. Some with tattoos have no reaction, others with the same pigment will. The shape of the tattoo has an effect.

  80. Not really Apple's problem by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    Stuff you might put in (or on) your wrist preventing Apple's watch from working right isn't really a problem with the watch. You did something non-standard to your skin and now you want some tech company to compensate for it?

    It's not their problem; it's your problem. But it's not a very significant problem in the big picture because only a tiny percentage of people have tattoos on their wrists. Of those, a minority want one. Of those, only a few percent can afford one. We're talking a handful of people affected. Why should Apple care?