Slashdot Mirror


Israel Meets With Google and YouTube To Discuss Censoring Videos (middleeastmonitor.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Various sources report Israel's Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Tzipi Hotovely meeting with representatives of Google and YouTube to discuss censoring Palestinian videos believed to incite violence. Original aricle (in Hebrew) from Maariv The open question is how Google and Youtube will define "inciting violence." Currently, all foreign journalists in the Palestinian territories are required to register with the Israeli military, and all footage must be approved through the Israeli Military Censor's office before being released. However, according to the article in alternet individual Palestinians have been uploading videos showing violence by Israeli soldiers, including execution-style killings, and highlighting the living conditions in the territories, which Israeli authorities consider inflammatory.

337 of 529 comments (clear)

  1. Violence! by amiga3D · · Score: 2

    Soldiers committing violence. I can't imagine such a thing.

    1. Re:Violence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just wait until someone murders your children as you wait for a bus, or throws a brick through your windshield while you're driving to work. You might start to think differently about "soldiers committing violence."

    2. Re:Violence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not simply violence, it's illegal violence such as crimes against humanity which is punishable by universal law. The violence is targeting civilians that are occupied by Israel on palestinian land.

    3. Re:Violence! by Squiddie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And after Israel gets Google to censor it, that's the only thing you will have. Seriously, Israel thinks reality is "inciting violence." Maybe if their policy wasn't to needlessly murder people, nobody would be violent against them. What else is Israel doing? Oh, they demolish houses of those that commit crimes, but only if they are Arabs. If a Jew does terrorist acts or murders, his house is not demolished, because that would be wrong. Arabs aren't people to these racists.

    4. Re:Violence! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, more violence sure will solve the problem.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Violence! by Wootery · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll play devil's advocate:

      Firstly, the mandatory [citation needed].

      Also, for all Israel's crimes, it's fairly clear they aren't set on maximising needless murder. If they wanted to crush every living soul in Palestine, let's be serious: no-one would stop them. But it doesn't happen. Why? Because Israel doesn't want to do that.

      The same certainly can't be said of Hamas, who would kill all Jews if they had their way (they're not exactly shy about this). But being morally superior to Hamas isn't saying much, of course.

    6. Re:Violence! by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Says Israel.

    7. Re:Violence! by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the land is Israel, why don't its citizens get to vote in Israeli elections?

    8. Re:Violence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except it is quite explicitly not theirs by both international and even israeli law. And since the borders are locked down, even if they wanted to leave they would be unable to.

    9. Re:Violence! by nbauman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll play devil's advocate:

      Firstly, the mandatory [citation needed].

      OK, I'll give you your citation.

      http://www2.ohchr.org/english/...

      GE.09-15866
      UNITED NATIONS
      A General Assembly Distr.
      GENERAL
      A/HRC/12/48
      25 September 2009
      Original: ENGLISH
      HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
      Twelfth session
      Agenda item 7
      HUMAN RIGHTS IN PALESTINE AND OTHER OCCUPIED ARAB TERRITORIES
      Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict

      7. Deliberate attacks against the civilian population

      43. The Mission investigated 11 incidents in which the Israeli armed forces launched direct attacks against civilians with lethal outcome (chap. XI). The facts in all bar one of the attacks indicate no justifiable military objective. The first two are attacks on houses in the al-Samouni neighbourhood south of Gaza City, including the shelling of a house in which Palestinian civilians had been forced to assemble by the Israeli armed forces. The following group of seven incidents concern the shooting of civilians while they were trying to leave their homes to walk to a safer place, waving white flags and, in some of the cases, following an injunction from the Israeli forces to do so. The facts gathered by the Mission indicate that all the attacks occurred under circumstances in which the Israeli armed forces were in control of the area and had previously entered into contact with or had at least observed the persons they subsequently attacked, so that they must have been aware of their civilian status. In the majority of these incidents, the consequences of the Israeli attacks against civilians were aggravated by their subsequent refusal to allow the evacuation of the wounded or to permit access to ambulances.

      A/HRC/12/48
      page 174
      witness's recollection, there had also been a radio message broadcast by the Israeli armed forces around 12.30 announcing that there would be a temporary cessation of shooting between 1 and 4 p.m. that day, during which time residents of the area were asked to walk to central Jabaliyah.

      773. At about 12.50 p.m., Khalid Abd Rabbo, his wife Kawthar, their three daughters, Souad (aged 9), Samar (aged 5) and Amal (aged 3), and his mother, Hajja Souad Abd Rabbo, stepped out of the house, all of them carrying white flag s. Less than 10 metres from the door was a tank, turned towards their house. Two soldiers were sitting on top of it having a snack (one was eating chips, the other chocolate, according to one of the witnesses). The family stood still, waiting for orders from the soldiers as to what they should do, but none was given. Without warning, a third soldier emerged from inside the tank and started shooting at the three girls and then also at their grandmother. Several bullets hit Souad in the chest, Amal in the stomach and Samar in the back. Hajja Souad was hit in the lower back and in the left arm.

      775. Inside the Abed Rabbo house, Amal and Souad died of their wounds. The family decided that they had to make an attempt to walk to Jabalya and take Samar, the dead bodies of Amal and Souad, and their grandmother to hospital. Khaled and Kawthar Abd Rabbo, and other family members and neighbours carried the girls on their shoulders. Hajja Souad was carried by family and neighbours on a bed. Samar was transferred to al-Shifa hospital and then, through Egypt, to Belgium, where she still is in hospital. According to her parents, Samar suffered a spinal injury and will remain paraplegic for the rest of her life.

      This has been documented by the New York Times, Washington Post, BBC, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and others, who actually interviewed the eyewitnesses. The Israeli government never interviewed the eyewitnesses, and never conducted an investigation that they talked about.

      You can search for "white flag" and get repeated incidents in which Israel

    10. Re:Violence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they wanted to crush every living soul in Palestine, let's be serious: no-one would stop them.

      Wow, what kind of pro-Israel echo chamber do you live in?

      I don't know exactly what would happen if Israel embarked on an intense and systematic campaign of genocide (e.g. designed to kill every non-Jew in the West Bank and Gaza in less than a year). But I can guarantee that there would be major international efforts to stop Israel from doing it. At the very least, Israel would face major trade sanctions - along the lines of apartheid South Africa. But there's a good chance that at least a few countries would hit Israel with bombs and missiles. Some might even send in ground troops. The whole situation could easily escalate into a world-wide nuclear war.

      Getting back to the whole incitement/propaganda/censorship topic, I have the sense people in the pro-Israel camp are unaware of how much mainstream opinion is shifting against Israel. They seem to imagine that a century from now Israel will still be happily discriminating against people who are not Jewish - e.g. Jewish (only) "right" of "return". But, at the same time, any hints of discrimination against Jewish people will be absolutely crushed - e.g. public careers destroyed by accusations of "antisemitism".

      As a matter of basic fairness, though, that doesn't seem sustainable. Eventually everyone's going to have to play by the same rules when it comes to discrimination.

    11. Re:Violence! by nbauman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's your cite. I gave this in more detail above.

      http://www2.ohchr.org/english/...

      GE.09-15866
      UNITED NATIONS
      A General Assembly Distr.
      GENERAL
      A/HRC/12/48
      25 September 2009
      Original: ENGLISH
      HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
      Twelfth session
      Agenda item 7
      HUMAN RIGHTS IN PALESTINE AND OTHER OCCUPIED ARAB TERRITORIES
      Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict

      7. Deliberate attacks against the civilian population
      43. The Mission investigated 11 incidents in which the Israeli armed forces launched directattacks against civilians with lethal outcome (chap. XI). The facts in all bar one of the attacks indicate no justifiable military objective. The first two are attacks on houses in the al-Samouni neighbourhood south of Gaza City, including the shelling of a house in which Palestinian civilians had been forced to assemble by the Israeli armed forces. The following group of seven incidents concern the shooting of civilians while they were trying to leave their homes to walk to a safer place, waving white flags and, in some of the cases, following an injunction from the Israeli forces to do so. The facts gathered by the Mission indicate that all the attacks occurred under circumstances in which the Israeli armed forces were in control of the area and had previously entered into contact with or had atleast observed the persons they subsequently attacked, so that they must have been aware of their civilian status. In the majority of these incidents, the consequences of the Israeli attacks against civilians were aggravated by their subsequent refusal to allow the evacuation of the wounded or to permit access to ambulances.

    12. Re:Violence! by Sun · · Score: 1

      They do.

    13. Re:Violence! by Sun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, not in the case of the videos in question here.

      They depict "violence" against armed terrorist while actively trying to kill Israelis. They provide names of poor kids killed by the vicious Israelis, while innocently strolling along the streets of Israel, peacefully stabbing bystanders. They glorify the heaven rewards you will get if you do the same.

      The article makes it sound like Israel is trying to silence the Palestinians from presenting their side. This is not the case (at least in this particular instance). We are talking about videos directed at Palestinians, using lies and distortions in order to incite impressionable Palestinians, often teenagers and children (some of the recent stabbing were done by 12 and 13 years olds) to go out and get themselves killed while trying to kill Jews.

      This is not political. This is plain incitement to violence.

      Shachar

    14. Re:Violence! by riskkeyesq · · Score: 1

      Bibi, go home, you're drunk.

    15. Re:Violence! by riskkeyesq · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

    16. Re: Violence! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Why don't you list the fucking real atrocities that are going in Syria, or in Africa, or in 100 other places where there is conflict in the world.

      Because they're not lobbying Google to censor Youtube uploads of their atrocities. Also, after the atrocities suffered by the Jewish people, we should expect better from Israel. And also, because don't give Syria privileged access to US funding, military hardware, and intelligence reports.

    17. Re:Violence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I tell my military friends that I respect that they exist and do what they do. I rarely agree with why they do it and don't respect anyone who believes in patriotism or nationalism. I don't believe being a soldier makes someone a hero. I don't believe modern militaries tend to act in the right most of the time. Being a soldier is a job... nothing more. It's no different than driving a bus or picking up trash. And... if you think I'm disrespecting the soldiers by saying this, that's bullshit. I've lived through bus strikes and garbage collector strikes and I believe we as a community suffered greatly during these times. The guy driving this bus and the guy picking up the trash are critical to our lives and our survival as a culture. Do you have any idea how many lives a year garbage collectors save? To give you a hint, it's far more than a soldier will in decades of service. Do you have any idea how many people die from illness in a society where garbage isn't properly managed?

      Policemen, firemen, garbage collectors, doctors, soldiers are all very very very important jobs. We should appreciate people who do them and choose to dig through the filth of society to make our lives better. That said... a soldier deserves no more special treatment than a doctor or a garbage collector. It's just a job.

    18. Re:Violence! by aevan · · Score: 1

      Mandatory Palestine. What became Isreal. When the jews acted just like the arabs of today. No hands over there are clean, it's just Isreal is pretending they are the sole victim instead of just aggressor #854 in that cursed plot of dirt. If you even want an easy specific, AOL Keywords: David Hotel Bombing

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    19. Re:Violence! by nbauman · · Score: 1

      It was a war. Shit happens.

      Did you say that about the Holocaust?

    20. Re:Violence! by MaxSmoke · · Score: 1

      The government over the territory was split between Israel and Palestine - not the private ownership. That in itself is quite benign thing - the Palestinians lived happily under the British government and could continue so under the Israeli government. However the Israeli army swept the land, forcing the Arabs out of their private properties. That IMHO ignited the hatred. As those people are still living in refugee camps after few decades, the situation is probably not going to calm anytime soon.

    21. Re:Violence! by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, I'll give you your citation.

      http://www2.ohchr.org/english/...

      GE.09-15866 UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/12/48 25 September 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Twelfth session Agenda item 7 HUMAN RIGHTS IN PALESTINE AND OTHER OCCUPIED ARAB TERRITORIES

      This post refers to the well-known Goldstone report:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      It should be noted that the author of the report retracted the claim that it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target civilians. Read the whole wikipedia article or google it for details, TLDR: The report stated that both Hamas and Israel targeted civilians, then the part about Israel targeting civilians was retracted because the author concluded that his sources were bias and inaccurate. Even with that having happened, the anti-Israel crowd still quote the redacted parts of the report because it fits their narrative, and fail to mention the part about Hamas targeting civilians.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    22. Re:Violence! by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      So why do the Israeli's keep referring to these people as Palestinians if they are actually Israelis?

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    23. Re:Violence! by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      And after Israel gets Google to censor it, that's the only thing you will have.

      When Chinese soldiers shoot Tibetans like dogs. That's also censored in China, but it's not censored in the rest of the world. I suspect Google will do the same thing here.

    24. Re:Violence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      blah blah blah, despite your bleating and reliance on the completely unbiased viewpoint of the UN and New York times, the undeniable fact is that if the Palestinians and hamas layed down their weapons there would be peace, if Israel lays down their weapons they get flooded on 3 sides by murderers intent on killing every single man woman and child, I mean really it's right there in their founding document to exterminate those people.

      It is not the standard SOP of the israeli army to kill innocents and children although surely it does happen, it is the primary activity of Hamas to kill innocents and children of Israeli culture, who do you think most deserves my support.

    25. Re:Violence! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Soldiers committing violence. I can't imagine such a thing.

      We need to get Mildred Pierce reporting on this!

    26. Re:Violence! by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It really is super double twisty speak to claim showing acts of violence being committed somehow incites violence, kind of fucking late you know, violence is already being committed. Reality is, showing those acts of violence being committed is putting enormous pressure on, to stop committing those acts of violence. So, question, is it an act of violence for a occupying force to drive around telling families they are going to gas them to death or not, https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (rather ironic considering the source). Honestly it looks like many of the acts of violence committed by the Government controlling that region, are being done purposefully to incite violence in return, so that an excuse can be fabricated to carry genocidal policies, without ramifications from the rest of the world.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    27. Re:Violence! by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      Except the EU (a large part of europe) for instance which acknowledges the territories as being palestine..

    28. Re:Violence! by jandersen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've got that spot on, I think. But first things first - as always when commenting on these issues, I'll start by stating that I am not, in any way, anti-semitic; I am not against the right of Jews to live and enjoy life and freedom just like everybody else, no matter what their religion or race. I am, however, against the state of affairs that is largely being perpetuated by the State of Israel.

      The existence of modern Israel has come about based on a combination of the bad conscience of the Western powers af WWII and the myth of the lost homeland of the Jews. Yes, there was once a nation called Israel, as far as we know - but that nation was itself based on the conquest of a previous nation followed by genocide of the previous inhabitants (if we are to believe the Bible, and who would doubt the Holy Scriptures, eh? Certainly not the Jews, I would have thought). Perhaps we should go and dig out the Filistrians and reinstate them in their rightful homeland? All nations are ephemeral in nature, Israel included.

      As for the role of the bad conscience of the West: however atrocious the Holocaust was, it is now part of a history that is getting ever more remote. I think we have learnt the lesson of that and many countries - Germany not least - have redeemed themselves. What happened back then should not be used as a carte blanche to excuse the present days state of Israel for any and all actions they desire to take. On the contrary, the memory of these horrors should inspire the citizens of Israel to be better than their opressors - and far better, not 'only just'. But there is a far more practical consideration: the might of the West is in decline. Soon nations like China and India, and later other nations who have no particular issue either for or against Israel, will play a role that may change the way Israel is being supported beying reason. In light of this, would it not be sensible if Israel started making friends with their neighbors? They can - but not if they allow their own religious extremists and their selfish landgrabbers to rule the country like they seem to do now.

    29. Re:Violence! by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The same situation which exists in Israel is slowly occurring in Europe, which is the greatest cohesive international enemy to their agenda. If Europe starts ethnic cleansing on a massive scale it will be quite easy for the same thing to fall under the radar for Israel.

    30. Re:Violence! by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Jews started blowing stuff up first, they ethnically cleansed the land by terrorism.

    31. Re:Violence! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So if some dude in a tank pulled up to your house and claimed it as his own, you'd just go find another house, happy that he has his land.

      Gotcha.

    32. Re:Violence! by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Now, most or maybe even all of them were ethnically cleansed by the terror threat of the Jews rather than a more hands on approach of course. There is a certain elegance in the near bloodless ethnic cleansing the Jews did in Israel, of course not entirely bloodless since you need to make a few examples, but ethnic cleansing it was.

      So technically you are right, they were not evicted. They were chases away by terror and not let back to their property.

    33. Re: Violence! by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      This is only have the story.

      Yes, Israel exists and should go on existing.

      But Palestine should exist as well.
      Yet every time Israeli settlers settle on occupied territory and the Israeli government does nothing about it, Israel is denying the existence and the right to exist for a Palestine state.

    34. Re:Violence! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      And it's not like Google=the entire internet. Just because a single search engine and a single video site censors something doesn't stop publication of videos. They are only used the most at this moment...censor them and the Palestinians will quickly move on to some other sites. News orgs will get these videos from the newer, non-censored sites. This idea will be just as effective as the RIAA / MPAA and their DCMA requests in stopping piracy.

    35. Re:Violence! by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      It's a bit more complicated than that. The terror was largely imaginary. It should however be noted that massacres occurred on both sides. That is Jews massacred Arabs and Arabs massacred Jews.

      The turning point was the was exaggerated on both sides but in particular by the Arabs of "Deir Yassin". The Arabs thought that by claiming that the women had been raped it would help their position and get the Arabs nations to enter the war. There are numerous eyewitness Arab accounts utterly denying the rape allegations. The result of the rape allegations however was the catalyst for the Palestine's to run away.

      If you abandon something and run away that's your choice, expecting to be let back later is a gamble you take at the time you ran away. For the Palestinians it was a really really bad call, but it was their call made with free will.

      On the other hand the USA, UK and USSR decided to forceably deport 14 million ethnic Germans from eastern europe with anywhere up to two million dying, Rather less than the 700k Palestinian's who fled of their own free will. Or how about the expulsion of 100-200k Greeks from Egypt, or the 900k from Algeria to prove that the Arabs are just as guilt of forced ethnic cleansing as anyone else.

    36. Re:Violence! by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was a war. Shit happens.

      No, it wasn't a war. It was a series of heavy-handed, ultra-violent overreactions to minor incidents which themselves were responses to systematic oppression. Military action often does kill civilians, the so-called "collateral damage", but herding groups of unarmed women and children into a building and then deliberately shelling that building to kill them all is not collateral damage; the unarmed civilians were the target.

      If you want to understand what's really going on in Israel, I highly recommend you read "Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel", by Max Blumenthal. It's a hard book to read, not because Blumenthal isn't a good writer but because the truth is so horrible. And if you doubt that it is the truth, check the included citations.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    37. Re:Violence! by andydread · · Score: 1

      I don't think anything would happen if Israel went systematic. Here's a scenario.
      UN security council will vote to do something
      US would veto anything the security council does in the name of "Israel has the right to defend themselves"
      Nothing would be done.

    38. Re:Violence! by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Israel controlled almost all the news, the Arabs got to hear what they wanted them to hear.

    39. Re:Violence! by nbauman · · Score: 2

      It should be noted that the author of the report retracted the claim that it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target civilians. Read the whole wikipedia article or google it for details, TLDR: The report stated that both Hamas and Israel targeted civilians, then the part about Israel targeting civilians was retracted because the author concluded that his sources were bias and inaccurate. Even with that having happened, the anti-Israel crowd still quote the redacted parts of the report because it fits their narrative, and fail to mention the part about Hamas targeting civilians.

      In true hasbara style, you are lying about the Wikipedia article. I'm astounded by these Israelis. They tell a lie, even when it's easy for anyone to look it up and find out that it's a lie:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      On 1 April 2011, Goldstone published a piece in The Washington Post titled 'Reconsidering the Goldstone Report on Israel and war crimes'. Goldstone noted that the subsequent investigations by Israel and recognized in the U.N. committee's report "indicate that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy" while "the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying." The other principal authors of the UN report, Hina Jilani, Christine Chinkin and Desmond Travers, have rejected Goldstone's reassessment arguing that there is "no justification for any demand or expectation for reconsideration of the report as nothing of substance has appeared that would in anyway change the context, findings or conclusions of that report with respect to any of the parties to the Gaza conflict".[15][16] According to journalist Connie Bruck, writing in the The New Yorker magazine, "Goldstone came under such pressure that threats were made to ban him from his grandson's bar mitzvah at a Johannesburg synagogue."[220] ...

      Also Goldstone maintained that, although the one correction should be made, he had "no reason to believe any part of the report needs to be reconsidered at this time" and that he didn't plan to pursue nullifying the report.[229]

      That pressure included Alan Dershowitz telling fanatics that Jewish law allows them to assassinate Goldstone. http://forward.com/news/breaki...

      I met Desmond Travers after Goldstone's letter, and Travers made it clear that Goldstone was speaking for himself, and the report hadn't retracted anything.

    40. Re:Violence! by Wootery · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of what you've said, but let's be clear: Israel shouldn't get a free-pass for war-crimes, despite that Hamas clearly want to kill as many Jews as they possibly can. (Hamas deny the holocaust, but make it quite clear that if they could, they'd create one.)

      Just because the enemy is morally depraved doesn't mean you should sweep the war-crimes of the comparative good guys, under the rug.

    41. Re:Violence! by Wootery · · Score: 1

      No. The two sides are not moral equals.

      Sam Harris isn't right about everything, but his thoughts on Israel seem reasonable, and there's not much point me parotting them at length. See this talk.

      The short version: the Israelis want peace. Hamas want to slaughter all the Jews. The Israelis have the military power to obliterate every last soul in Palestine... but they don't. The only thing stopping Hamas committing a massacre of Israeli Jews is that they physically can't.

    42. Re:Violence! by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      In true hasbara style, you are lying about the Wikipedia article.

      Are you sick? Here is an exact quote from the article, copy-pasted:

      On 1 April 2011, Goldstone retracted his claim that it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target citizens, saying "While the investigations published by the Israeli military and recognized in the U.N. committee's report have established the validity of some incidents that we investigated in cases involving individual soldiers, they also indicate that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy."

      The text then goes on to specifying criticism of Goldstone's recantation, but it stands.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    43. Re:Violence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What a load of bs you posted.

      Facts:
      Hundreds of thousands of rockets and bombings by "Palestinians" against Israelis
      Television shows for children which teach Jews are subhuman and to kill them
      Terrorist supplies and launching sites in the ground floors and beneath civilian housing
      A very real "Pallywood" creating false propaganda that worked with a compliant Western press until the Internet
      "Palestinian" governments based on extermination of Jews and taking the land of Israel
      "Palestinians" in Israel have more personal freedom, better health, and higher standard of living then those in Arab countries.
      A UN Human Rights Council whose leadership is actively anti-Jew
      Scale of "Palestinian refuge" situation is too large and too long to be actual refuge conditions.
      % of UN expense to support "Palestinian refugees" and character of that program is designed to build and perpetuate situation.

      You expect people to believe what you claim as autobiography without questioning how you could come to such a conclusion in the face of the reality of constant terrorist attacks against Israel? Pfff.

      Possibilities about your post:

      1) You're a useful idiot
      2) You're a self-hating Jew (mental illness)
      3) You're lying
      4) You're an agent provacateur...and not a good one.

    44. Re:Violence! by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Are you sick?

      If the facts don't support you, throw in an ad hominem for distraction.

      Here is an exact quote from the article, copy-pasted:

              On 1 April 2011, Goldstone retracted his claim that it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target citizens, saying "While the investigations published by the Israeli military and recognized in the U.N. committee's report have established the validity of some incidents that we investigated in cases involving individual soldiers, they also indicate that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy."

      And why did you deceptively leave out the text which immediately follows?

      "On 14 April 2011 the three other coauthors of the United Nations (UN) fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict of 2008-2009 Hina Jilani, Christine Chinkin and Desmond Travers released a joint statement criticizing Goldstone's recantation of this aspect of the report. They all agreed that the report was valid and that Israel and Hamas had failed to investigate alleged war crimes satisfactorily.

      I spoke to Travers and he made it clear that Goldstone was speaking for himself, not the authors, and had no authority to change the conclusions of the written report without the agreement of the other co-authors. The report still "stands." And the facts of the atrocities, like the deliberate machine-gun murders of 3-year-old children carrying white flags, still stand.

      This was Goldstone's statement under pressure that included Dershowitz' death threats. Taking Goldstone's statement at face value is like taking the statements of the defendants at the Moscow purge trials at face value.

      The Rabbo killings was not redacted. It still "stands." Even if it were redacted from the Goldstone report, it was originally confirmed by human rights organizations and many news media investigations (many of them staffed by Jews), and no one (not even MEMRI) has disproven it. I saw that BBC video of 5-year-old Samar in a hospital bed.

      For the benefit of other Slashdotters following this, I give this as a live example of Israeli lying.

      Really, how can you call yourself a Jew (which is what I assume you are) and defend a massacre like this, which is no different from the massacres of Jews in the Ukraine that my mother described to me?

      773. At about 12.50 p.m., Khalid Abd Rabbo, his wife Kawthar, their three daughters, Souad (aged 9), Samar (aged 5) and Amal (aged 3), and his mother, Hajja Souad Abd Rabbo, stepped out of the house, all of them carrying white flag s. Less than 10 metres from the door was a tank, turned towards their house. Two soldiers were sitting on top of it having a snack (one was eating chips, the other chocolate, according to one of the witnesses). The family stood still, waiting for orders from the soldiers as to what they should do, but none was given. Without warning, a third soldier emerged from inside the tank and started shooting at the three girls and then also at their grandmother. Several bullets hit Souad in the chest, Amal in the stomach and Samar in the back. Hajja Souad was hit in the lower back and in the left arm.

      775. Inside the Abed Rabbo house, Amal and Souad died of their wounds.

      Yes, I'm sick. I'm sick from seeing the Zionist experiment wind up like that other nationalist experiment.

    45. Re:Violence! by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Thank you for correcting me on the history of things :-)

      I think the gist of my considerations is still valid, though - Israel's claim to any territory has little to do with ancient history and everything to do with the fact that they have conquered the land from the Palestinians. And they stand to lose their privileged position in the world, when the balance of power shifts away from the US - something that seems increasingly likely, IMO.

    46. Re:Violence! by Lennie · · Score: 1

      I wish the US would just stop supporting Israel as much as they do.

      But it is useless wishful thinking, because supposedly the Israel lobby is the strongest lobby in the US.

      Here is a documentary from 2007 which talks about this:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    47. Re:Violence! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Why do all the nutters object to the violence by Israel, but not that by those that attack Israel?

    48. Re:Violence! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There is no anything, only occupied something. There is almost no place on the planet where someone doesn't have a prior claim of some kind.

    49. Re:Violence! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Since the US liberated Kuwait, we should repeat the errors from before, and resettle 100% of the Syrian refugees to Kuwait, and let them break out in civil war, if nobody likes that idea.

      The only question is, what country in Africa should we send all the African refugees? I vote for Tunisia, for no particular reason.

    50. Re:Violence! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then start sanctions against Egypt for closing the border. Oh yeah, it's not about the facts, it always comes back to Jew-hating. Anti-Zionist was invented for racists to claim they don't hate the sinner, just the sin. A difference exists in theory, but not in practice.

    51. Re:Violence! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      1) you're an idiot
      2) you're racist
      3) you're lying by omission
      4) holy pot/kettle situation batman

      Seriously, posting such a one-sided biased view of the conflict is so blatantly bollocks it's amazing you can look in the mirror without punching it.

    52. Re:Violence! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      So a 54 year old missile system is no match for a 39 year old airframe? Despite heroically being used to take down a modern missile and successfully downing a stealth bomber?

      Shit, your bullshit was obvious the moment you used the term 'zionist' to describe the Israeli airforce. Do try and at least pretend to have some semblance of objectivity.

    53. Re:Violence! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The Israelis are much more pragmatic and cost effective than the Americans in their anti-terror tactics, they do what works and try to get the most bang for their buck.

      That's curious, I was sure that the Palestinian people were resorting to asymmetrical warfare to try and protect themselves against Israeli aggression, and/or to assault Israel.

      Doesn't sound like the anti-terror tactics are being very effective at all.

    54. Re:Violence! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's how it has worked for all recorded history.

    55. Re: Violence! by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      i'm absolutely fine with that. 3 generations of refugees is enough. you know what refugees that aren't lynchpins to pet ethnic grievances do? they migrate and settle.

      perpetual victimhood, because the arabic world doesn't like that they lost land to the jews.

      guess what, the ottoman empire imploded. and the british divied up what was left.

      the jews were fine with any border as long as they got a nation, and then they went through a couple of existential wars with the entire region, now they want good borders and i don't blame them. and i don't blame them for wanting to keep israel numerically jewish, we've seen what happens when they're a minority.

      how many people actually think it's false... that the arabs unilaterally disarming would mean peace?

    56. Re:Violence! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Were the Jews enemy combatants? If not, then the act, taken in war, was unrelated to war, That's one of the arguments here. Both sides don't take much care to avoid civilian casualties. But when someone shoots at you from a hospital, you are allowed to shoot back. You aren't supposed to blow up a hospital if you suspect it has a bad guy in room 3.

    57. Re:Violence! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      a soldier deserves no more special treatment than a doctor or a garbage collector. It's just a job.

      Albeit one with more of a focus on semi-unconscious homo-eroticism.

    58. Re: Violence! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      "There is no Israel, there is only occupied Palestine."

      Go fuck yourself. This is the reason we still don't have peace. Israel, was, is and will always be there. Get over it, you worthless hate-filled piece of shit.

      Excellent demonstration of brotherly love - leading by example - I applaud you :D

    59. Re:Violence! by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      there has been continuous jewish presence in the holyland for 3 millenia. they get driven out, they come back, they get massecred, they bounce back. etc. etc. they kind of like it there.

      they didn't conquer the land, so much as, the ottoman empire imploded and that's what the winners of WW2 did with it. The jews defended whatever borders they could and i think the majority of the palestinian refugees fled voluntarily, because they thought they'd be coming back to a judenrein area, or that's what the arab world was telling them.

    60. Re:Violence! by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      to be fair, the king david hotel was a legitimate military target. And there is some evidence to suggest that irgun made an attempt to warn them to evacuate the building, but the message to bungled along the way.

    61. Re:Violence! by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      nah, in retrospect, the the arabs decided they screwed the pooch on that one.

    62. Re:Violence! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck cares? Just STOP!

    63. Re:Violence! by zlives · · Score: 1

      because if they were Israelis they would have a vote.

    64. Re:Violence! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "The home demolition is a tactic that the Israeli government has revived to punish families of alleged Palestinian terrorists"

      http://www.usatoday.com/story/...

    65. Re:Violence! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "The IDF began to prepare over the weekend to demolish the homes of three Palestinian terrorists, two of whom wounded eight soldiers in the West Bank on Friday. Palestinian assailant Amar Arafat Issa Za’akik, 17, ran down six soldiers with his car as they stood on the side of the road, near the entrance of the Palestinian village of Beit Umar, located off of Route 60 in between Gush Etzion and the West Bank city of Hebron."

      http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Isra...

    66. Re:Violence! by Wootery · · Score: 1

      You're missing my point. Israel has the power advantage. They have a first-world military. If they were set on maximising killing in Palestine, things would look nothing like what we see today.

      This isn't true of Hamas, who are quite clear about the matter: they want to bring about another holocaust. The only thing holding them back is that they don't have the might to pull it off.

      Imagine what would happen if the power-balance were reversed. Very different situation, and very telling as to who has the moral high-ground.

    67. Re:Violence! by jandersen · · Score: 1

      there has been continuous jewish presence in the holyland for 3 millenia. they get driven out, they come back, they get massecred, they bounce back. etc. etc. they kind of like it there.

      You almost sound like you want to tell us something. Do you mean that ecause the Jews have always been there, they have a right to take over? Don't get me wrong - I'm pragmatic enough to accept the status quo, but I am quite allergic to ideological and religious zealots claiming special rights based on fiction.

      they didn't conquer the land, so much as, the ottoman empire imploded and that's what the winners of WW2 did with it. The jews defended whatever borders they could and i think the majority of the palestinian refugees fled voluntarily, because they thought they'd be coming back to a judenrein area, or that's what the arab world was telling them.

      Heh, I see what you are doing there: trying to sneak in a suggestion, that the Palestinians are somehow a kind of Nazis, by using a German sounding word: 'judenrein'. Certain factions in Israel are practicing that sentiment very well, with the tacit approval of the Israeli government, it would appear. Whatever you say, the territory was built on conquest, taken from the Palestinians, and even now, how many years later? - you are still denying them a nation of their own. Why is that? Are the Jews somehow the master race and the goyim inferior? I think it is fair question - it is so easy to see the Jewish exclusiveness as expressing such a view. Again, I should probably repeat that I am not an anti-semite; for all I know, many of my friends and colleagues could well be Jews, I have never given it much thought. To me, each individual stands on their own merits; I assume the Jews have their fair share of both good and bad people.

    68. Re:Violence! by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      first block:
      not the right to take over, but calling it conquest is rife with problems too. they have had a continuous presence, it's not even a return. This is interesting reading for me, not much more, and i'm as far from religious as a reasonable person could be, i am one of those "made so they cannot believe."

      I don't care whether or not their rights have been conferred by god or not. I will say though that it is without dispute, largely, that there have been jews in that area tracing back to before the roman empire... so yeah, at least 2000 years. whereas arabs... well, they have a great deal of claim to the arabian peninsula, iran iraq, babylon etc... but their claims to the land are claims of later conquest than the ones of the jews. that's around 700 CE?

      second block: not just german sounding, straight-up nazi term meaning "cleansed of jews." There aren't as many succinct ways to say "kill all the jews" in english. And i think that was the express purpose of the 5 army invasion in 1948. And that was the propoganda, "don't get in the way, we'll drive these jews into the sea, come back after we've won. also you might want to flee, the jews are raping all the women and children."

      also this dude was spiritual leader of mandatory palestine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      second block: i'm not that heavily invested in this topic, grew up in new jersey, not jewish, we had something like 1/20 jews population-wise, :) i've been to a bar mitzvah before, which is interesting to say the least.
      anyway, it was not built on conquest for the pretty simple fact that borders hadn't been drawn yet. my point was, the ottomans ruled everybody, pretty damn peacefully... except you know, they kinda wanted to keep those uppity jews down. They imploded as a result of WWI and pressure from the rest of europe, so after WWI the empire got divvied up. Eventually, after WWII the british got tired of getting terrorized by the jews for not keeping their word. So, they decided they'd let the newly formed UN handle the ass-ache.

      The UN decided to carve out a tiny chunk of the british mandate for israel, and give the rest to the arabs. meh. the palestinians have a nation of their own, it was called Jordan. the 5 arab nations didn't go to war just to with the nascent israel just to defend their bretheren, they did it also to divvy up who would get what chunks. but the palestinian identity was a convenient fiction.

      in this day and age, i've never been issued death threats for mocking moses or christ. and in the same breath, someone that says, "be compassionate and culturally sensitive, blasphemy instigates violence," will say, "safe space safe space" as if they've got a portable "base" in a game of tag. cognitive dissonance at its finest. I'm just going to say, i've a liberal bent, and i'd prefer jewish rule of that area, i certainly know which one i'd rather live under, and if most liberals took a long hard look at their allies, they'd agree.

      i'd rather live in israel than jordan. i can call bibi a "f*ckin' c*nt" in israel, if you did that in jordan, about their heads of state, prepare to go to jail and be fined heavily if anyone hears you. also apparently it's illegal to proselytize to muslims.

    69. Re:Violence! by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I rarely agree with why they do it

      Speaking as a former soldier, I and most of those I served with (that I discussed the topic with, anyway) didn't agree with the "why" either. But when we signed up we took an Enlistment Oath:

      "I, (state name of enlistee), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

      The "why" doesn't really come into play, except when it contradicts the UCMJ or Constitution. And, even then, I expect most members of the military would continue the mission outside of the most egregious of cases. (Assuming they even knew the "why" in the first place, which doesn't always make its way down the chain of command.)

      I do agree that someone does not become a hero simply by enlisting. It does give me a somewhat-larger amount of default respect for them once they've finished training, but that probably comes from being one myself. Even if you never deploy, you still deal with all kinds of shit that most civilians would not even think of.

  2. Fuck Israel by sexconker · · Score: 1, Troll

    Fuck Israel. They're trying to censor the fact they they have turned into the Nazis.
    Go to Youtube now and look up what their soldiers are doing. Look at how Israel treats the "foreigners" (non-Jews) in Palestine.

    1. Re:Fuck Israel by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      sadly both sides are acting atrociously. short of turning both Israel and Palestine into a wasteland I am not sure this will ever get better as both sides have demonstrated time and time again they are incapable of living peacefully.

    2. Re:Fuck Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sadly there is actual video evidence against israeli side. This is why they are asking help from google to censor the other side, they no longer can censor the palestinians independently.

    3. Re:Fuck Israel by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      sadly both sides are acting atrociously.

      That does not make them morally equivalent. Israel has far more power, and has far more options. Their violence is state-sanctioned, while most Palestinian violence is perpetrated by individuals. But most importantly, as an American, I object to Israel's violence because it is done, in part, with my tax dollars, in the form of military aid and loan guarantees.

    4. Re:Fuck Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is a fact that there are 1.7 million Arab and Muslim citizens of Israel proper. They all have the same civil and religious rights as Jews and Christians. It is also a fact in all the Middle East, those are the only Arabs and Muslims that have protected civil and religious rights.
      To be more clear, Israel is the only country in the Middle East where Women, Gays, Arabs and Muslims have full religious and civil rights.

      They go about their daily lives, shop at Israeli malls, use Israeli services, frequent Israeli restaurants and bars, send their children to study at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and receive Israeli social and health benefits.

      Israeli Arabs are the most educated Arabs in the world, with the best living standards and opportunities in the region.
      Arabs serve as judges in the Israel Supreme Court;
      Some of the best doctors in Israel are Arabs, working in almost every hospital in the country;
      They vote in open and free elections. They can run for office in these elections.

      In fact there are 16 Arab members of parliament who enjoy the right to criticize the government – a right that they exhaust to the fullest – protected by the freedom of speech;
      Arabs win popular reality shows;
      And you can even find Arab diplomats like George Deek.

      THAT IS HOW ISRAEL TREATS NON JEWS IN ISRAEL.

      The videos (and posts) that say otherwise are lies, and incitement. The exact kind of slander that should removed.

    5. Re:Fuck Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Israel has far more power, and has far more options.

      Yes they do, which is why they've been the most patient of all the Middle Eastern countries. They have to deal with a Palestinian Government which has IN ITS CHARTER the goal of the total destruction of Israel. How exactly do you think Israel can realistically deal with neighbors of that caliber, also knowing the world's spotlight is always on them and almost never on what their enemies are doing?

      Both sides are guilt of atrocities and I take no sides in the conflict. But Israel can't win with some people it seems. People just don't want to believe that their enemies are outright, callous fucks as well.

    6. Re:Fuck Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As the poster noted, both sides act atrociously. State-sanctioned violence is absolutely supported by the Palestinian government.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOWNNvhZ0e8

    7. Re:Fuck Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Israel doesn't even recognize that there exist such thing as a palestinian. Rest of your comment is bullshit without any references, there is a difference between Hamas charter and Palestinian Government Charter. It's extremely disturbing that Benjamin Netanyahus political party Likud character is equally vile as the Hamas charter.

      The Hateful Likud Charter Calls for Destruction of Any Palestinian State

      Since virtually every comment on Hamas in American media includes the assertion that the group’s Charter rejects Israel’s right to exist, it’s worth noting the following from the Likud Platform of 1999:

      a. “The Jordan river will be the permanent eastern border of the State of Israel.”
      b. “Jerusalem is the eternal, united capital of the State of Israel and only of Israel.
      The government will flatly reject Palestinian proposals to divide Jerusalem”
      c. “The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river.”
      d. “The Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria and Gaza are the realization of Zionist values. Settlement of the land is a clear expression of the unassailable right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel and constitutes an important asset in the defense of the vital interests of the State of Israel. The Likud will continue to strengthen and develop these communities and will prevent their uprooting.

      There have been some updates to the platform more recently, reflecting Israel’s withdrawal of settlements from Gaza in 2005. But the Likud Party has *never* in its statements of principles, accepted a Palestinian State. Its electoral partner, Yisrael Beitenu, has likewise categorically rejected the possibility of an independent Palestinian State, insisting that the idea is nothing more than a ploy to facilitate the destruction of Israel.

      Source: http://www.juancole.com/2014/08/charter-destruction-palestinian.html

    8. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Palestine is recognised as a independent state. Therefore this is a war between states.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    9. Re:Fuck Israel by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Israel has far more power, and has far more options.

      Yes they do, which is why they've been the most patient of all the Middle Eastern countries. They have to deal with a Palestinian Government which has IN ITS CHARTER the goal of the total destruction of Israel. How exactly do you think Israel can realistically deal with neighbors of that caliber, also knowing the world's spotlight is always on them and almost never on what their enemies are doing?

      Both sides are guilt of atrocities and I take no sides in the conflict. But Israel can't win with some people it seems. People just don't want to believe that their enemies are outright, callous fucks as well.

      Israel locks up millions of people in what amounts to the largest concentration camps in human history and the government of Israel abuses it's power to ethnically cleanse vast areas of the Palestinian territories it occupies (some Israeli politico called it 'smile and annex'). Now the Israelis want to get Google and Facebook to suppress videos that show their how their soldiers act in these giant concentration camps and how they go about implementing the Israeli government's policy of ethnic cleansing. I am alarmed that Google and Facebook even consented to conduct talks about suppressing videos of Israeli troops summarily executing prisoners because it indicates that they are open to the idea of actually doing it. If Israel really wants to prevent attacks by Palestinian youths angry about Israeli soldiers summarily executing prisoners and videos showing the shitty living conditions in it's monster sized concentration camps Israel should consider prosecuting soldiers who do such things and improving the discipline of it's army and improving living conditions in the concentration camps rather than trying to solve the problem by suppressing the evidence of this. Not that this really matters. Firstly the Palestinians will find other ways of making their videos public and Israel is in for a game of whack-a-mole that it just can't win. Secondly, who forgot to educate that pompous git Benjamin Netanyahu and his ilk about the Streisand effect? ...whoever it was did the Palestinians a big favour.

    10. Re:Fuck Israel by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Palestine is recognised as a independent state. Therefore this is a war between states.

      One Israeli of my acquaintance stated that "They are not 'Palestinians', they are Arabs and as such they should be happy to live anywhere in the Arab world. Israel isn't part of the Arab world."

      Aside from Australians I have never met a group more prone to racism than Israelis. But unlike Aussies the Israeli men didn't seem to be entirely misogynistic.

      Interesting how Judaism is pretty much the only religion alive today which is almost entirely racial in nature and focussed on parentage. Who your mother is matters very much in Judaism; I don't believe there is any other religion for which your parents, your genealogy, actually matters at all.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    11. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. Anyone can convert, and no one can then consider you any less Jewish than any other Jew, no matter their pedigree. So the only real difference is that there are many defacto Jews and non practising Jews; The big difference is the difficulty is giving up your Jewish status.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    12. Re:Fuck Israel by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      > both sides have demonstrated time and time again they are incapable of living peacefully.

      Is that true?

      Israel has demonstrated that they do not mind living with Arabs. Israel gives full citizenship rights. Arabs can join the military, own land, vote, even hold public office.

      By contrast, Hamas has it written into their charter they Hamas considers it their responsibility to kill every Jew on earth.

    13. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Hey. if they want to be a state and be judged more harshly like a state, I say let them.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    14. Re:Fuck Israel by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > Israeli Arabs are the most educated Arabs in the world, with the best living standards and opportunities in the region.

      If you count Arabic speaking Muslims as "Arabs" this way, I suspect you've not included Kuwait.

    15. Re:Fuck Israel by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Yes and no. Anyone can convert, and no one can then consider you any less Jewish than any other Jew, no matter their pedigree.

      Then where are the black and Chinese Hasidic Jews?

      No, anyone can not convert and be considered just as Jewish as any other Jew. Maybe in some liberal US synagogue, but just look at the racist treatment African jews get in Israel.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Fuck Israel by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Israel has demonstrated that they do not mind living with Arabs.

      http://www.theguardian.com/new...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      No, it is the liberals who can make it up as they go along. But if you believe in the one and only truth of the Bible, you must accept a converted Jew as a Jew in all ways. It is not Christianity, where you can be judged on your Christianity, found wanting, and kicked out. And Jew is a Jew, pretty much forever. There are very few things that can change that. Its all ritualised and quantified into black and white categories. There is no, "you have not been to church in a month, you are not a real Christian". The Old Testament lays out what makes you a Jew and what can take it away; And there are no levels of Jewness. A Jew can skip Jew church for a thousand years, generation after generation, and is still a Jew.

      Then where are the black and Chinese Hasidic Jews?

      Just because you can convert, does not mean everyone is going to convert. Jews are one of the least evangelical of all the religions and typically do not seek out converts. And just because you are a Jew, does not mean you cannot be racist, even against fellow Jews of other races.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    18. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of the world considers it an independent state. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine)

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    19. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      From my understanding the Orthodoxy questions the validity of the conversions on religious grounds. I think I have heard that they are pressured into conversions, and obviously do not mean to actually uphold Jewish law making their conversions invalid by definition. The Orthodoxy is strict, but at least theoretically if you meet their strict standards on Jewish observation, they you have to take the Bible's word on the matter that you are Jewish now.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    20. Re:Fuck Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Israel locks up millions of people in what amounts to the largest concentration camps in human history

      Jesus Christ, what about fucking North Korea? Does everyone forget the far, far worse concentration camps still existing in that shithole of a place? Where whole families are kept until they die, without any possibility of release?

      I really think people go nuts lose sense of perspective when it comes to the ills of Israel. There's too much strong emotion about the subject for anyone to even try to have a reasonable discussion about the situation.

    21. Re:Fuck Israel by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      By contrast, Hamas has it written into their charter they Hamas considers it their responsibility to kill every Jew on earth.

      Mildly amusing when a politician quotes such rhetoric it always seems to be in the context of excuses for inaction and avoidance of constructive resolution to outstanding problems.

      How many times have politicians used "Death to America" as an excuse to rally against the Iran nuclear deal? Leveraging rhetoric exclusively to justify a position is weak sauce.

    22. Re:Fuck Israel by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Aside from Australians I have never met a group more prone to racism than Israelis. But unlike Aussies the Israeli men didn't seem to be entirely misogynistic.

      Bigot: someone who claims that nationality determines personality.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    23. Re:Fuck Israel by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      Aside from Australians I have never met a group more prone to racism than Israelis. But unlike Aussies the Israeli men didn't seem to be entirely misogynistic.

      I think you need to travel more. try visiting places like the US or south Africa or India.

    24. Re:Fuck Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed about Australian men and misogyny, however have you met the Aussie women? There's a reason.. :)

    25. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Where is Palestine?

    26. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Tell your friends that the 1947 war is over and they lost.

    27. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a Martian. Because I fucking said so, that's why!

      The term Palestinian, historically speaking, was assigned to the Jews when the Romans renamed Judea and Samaria to Palestine. The Arabs stole the name, and I refuse to acknowledge their ownership of stolen property.

    28. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You aren't feral; you're rabid.

    29. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      There are both black and Chinese Jews. Why should either group become Hasidic, given that Hasidim are originally from Eastern European countries? And you have conflated racism with religionism (I just made up the term, deal with it). African Jews are Jews. Just because Jews are capable of racism toward other Jews does not make them any less a Jew. I'd also point out that for the most part the racism is exhibited by non-religious Jews in Israel. The religious Jews tend to just ignore them.

      I realize that ignorance is a way of life with those who hate, so I understand your position. I just happen to think you're an incredible idiot and deserve any harm that comes to you. As they say, stupidity should be painful.

    30. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Orthodoxy in Israel absolutely recognizes conversions. The only point of contention is whose conversions they recognize. That's more of a political thing than a religious thing, however. I don't know where you get your information from, but it's obviously a source with more opinions than facts.

    31. Re:Fuck Israel by alantus · · Score: 1

      The world is a horrible messed up place. But, eventually, when it comes to discrimination, Israel is going to have to start playing by the same rules as everyone else.

      Last time I checked, Mexicans were not free to just go live in the US and eat palak paneer while wearing a sombrero and listening to Beethoven.

      Why is Israel held to different standards?

    32. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      By your measure, Americans can't live with Blacks, even though Blacks have exactly the same rights as any other American.

    33. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      No country ruled by Muslims will give equal rights to non-Muslims. To even entertain the idea demonstrates a complete ignorance of Muslim history from its founding to the present.

    34. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Israel plays by the same rules as the Muslims. They just can't stand it when the shoe's on the other foot, so they go on murderous rampages.

    35. Re:Fuck Israel by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      That's probably why you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. From the outside, your view is only the view presented by the media. The sad fact is that Arab propaganda is much more effective than Israeli/Jewish propaganda. It's probably because people more readily believe 100% bullshit.

    36. Re:Fuck Israel by aevan · · Score: 1

      Japan

    37. Re:Fuck Israel by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      How much absurdity can you possibly fit into one paragraph? If Israel's committing an "ethnic cleansing" it's the single worst one in history given the life expectancy and population both continue to rise. The fact is Israel treats "palestine" (which somehow miraculously stopped including Jordan at some point) better than pretty much any other country on earth, let alone better than any other country on earth would treat people whose governing charter explicitly called for genocide and who constantly indiscriminately attacked civilians. You're like the MSNBC reporters who claim Israel shoots unarmed civilians right before playing a video of the fucker chasing people with a knife.

      These videos aren't summary executions, they're videos on how to fucking stab civilians for maximum casualties and other terrorist agitprop.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    38. Re:Fuck Israel by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      You mean the Kaifeng Jews and Beta Israel?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    39. Re:Fuck Israel by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      How much absurdity can you possibly fit into one paragraph? If Israel's committing an "ethnic cleansing" it's the single worst one in history given the life expectancy and population both continue to rise. The fact is Israel treats "palestine" (which somehow miraculously stopped including Jordan at some point) better than pretty much any other country on earth, let alone better than any other country on earth would treat people whose governing charter explicitly called for genocide and who constantly indiscriminately attacked civilians. You're like the MSNBC reporters who claim Israel shoots unarmed civilians right before playing a video of the fucker chasing people with a knife.

      These videos aren't summary executions, they're videos on how to fucking stab civilians for maximum casualties and other terrorist agitprop.

      No it isn't, I'd say the Nazi murder of six million Jews alone completely outweighs Israel's "smile and annex" policy in the occupied territories interns of severity of ethnic cleansing. Don't blow what I said out of proportion. Plus, the summary talked about videos of execution-style killings so perhaps you can explain to us how those differ differs from summary executions?

    40. Re:Fuck Israel by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Well for starters those videos of "summary executions" are actually videos of how best to stab someone and other terrorist agitprop. They're "executions" in the same way MSNBC reported on an "unarmed" man being executed and then literally showed him chasing people with a knife trying to murder them.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    41. Re:Fuck Israel by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you realize that it's not a concentration camp right? seems like you drank up that cooled real good.

      So If you lock up close to 1.9 million people in a limited strip of territory and don't allow them to enter and exit freely, tightly control the influx of supplies and seek to censor and suppress information about what you are doing in there? what is that? The Zionist idea of a holiday park?

    42. Re:Fuck Israel by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's all you've got? That's how you defend your logically-bankrupt disgusting condemnation of millions? You are a terrible, terrible human being.

    43. Re:Fuck Israel by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And one side is a country claiming to be a western, democratic, functioning bastion of diplomacy, and the other is continually under siege and being eroded gradually and systematically. Not differentiating the two isn't really helping your argument.

    44. Re:Fuck Israel by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Are you going deny they are getting ready to annex the Golan Heights? Which they ethnically cleansed in a more classical way than current Israel, rounding up people and kicking them across the border.

    45. Re:Fuck Israel by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You mean the Kaifeng Jews and Beta Israel?

      They're not Hasidic.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    46. Re:Fuck Israel by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      By your measure, Americans can't live with Blacks, even though Blacks have exactly the same rights as any other American.

      You're catching on.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    47. Re:Fuck Israel by james_gnz · · Score: 1

      So the Nazis weren't really racist? The death camps were more of an anti-religion kind of thing?

      Actually, sort of, to an extent. From Wikipedia (which references other sources):

      Anyone with three or four Jewish grandparents was to be exterminated without exception. In other genocides, people were able to escape death by converting to another religion or in some other way assimilating. This option was not available to the Jews of occupied Europe,[29] unless their grandparents had converted before 18 January 1871 [the day the German Empire was proclaimed]. All persons of enough recent Jewish ancestry to be considered a Jew were to be exterminated in the German occupied territories.[30] The Holocaust

      This is clearly not a purely religious classification (as converting away from Judaism is not relevant from 18 January 1871 onwards). However it doesn't seem to be a purely racial classification either, on the face of it, since the lineage is traced back to people who were adherents of Judaism on the 18 January 1871 (unless I've read it wrong).

      That said, I guess that would be adherents of Judaism according to some official record, and people may be unlikely to officially denounce a religion their parents believe, even if they don't believe it themselves, so in practice the point may be somewhat moot.

    48. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a good group of people who's advice we should be taking.

      What group? Pretty much every single member of the UN? Plus two extra.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    49. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      No, the Nazi definition was around almost purely racial lines. You could be a practising Jew, who had no ties to the racial group, and you would be considered a full Aryan.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    50. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Unimportant countries or no, it is 80% of the population of the planet. That is a fairly important majority.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    51. Re:Fuck Israel by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      And yet the acronym JBB is in widespread use..."Jew by birth". If your a convert you might not hear it, but the JBBs will be talking about it (and you) behind your back. I'm not being racist, that's just what my various Jewish JBB friends have admitted to. Their holy book might dictate no differential treatment, but it happens every day.

    52. Re:Fuck Israel by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Are these liberal Jews, or orthodox Israeli Jews?

      All Jews I know are not even practising Jews, so they have no reason to respect the law of the bible on conversions.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    53. Re:Fuck Israel by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      They have to deal with a Palestinian Government which has IN ITS CHARTER the goal of the total destruction of Israel.

      Calling for the "total destruction" of a state isn't the same as calling for the mass murder of its citizens. Nazi Germany was "totally destroyed" by the WWII allies, but Germans went on to live in a better, less violent, more democratic state.

    54. Re:Fuck Israel by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Japan

      Being Japanese isn't a religion but possibly Shinto I'll grant.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    55. Re:Fuck Israel by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      You are a fucking idiot.

      Palestinian are not Arab, they are of semitic decent.

      Both Arabs and Jews are of semitic descent, though European Jews are rather diluted through intermarriage over the past 2000 years. "Palestinians" are Arabs. The term Palestinian is political, not racial.

      e.g.: They share common ancestor with the jews that left the region to colonise Europe.

      All Arabs share a common ancestor with those Jews. I'd like to point out that Jews never colonized Europe.

      It is for the jews the assimilate into the Palestinian nation,

      At the time the Jews started returning with the explicit goal of establishing a State, there were no "Palestinians", never mind a nation of them.

      The argument made by Israel is that the term 'Palestinian' was invented during the period when Israel was being formed and Jewish jackbooted thugs were going around kicking 'Arabs' out of their homes.

      The claim is that by calling themselves 'Palestinian' they were claiming a connection to the Philistines (AKA the Phonecians (you may have heard of them, they invented phonetic writing)).

      The Philistines were a race of people who inhabited the 'promised land' when the Israelites arrived there. So they were exterminated.

      Many Israelis claim that the so-called 'Palestinians' are just Bedouin Arabs who moved into their promised land after their ancestors vacated it because they (the Hebrews) didn't like the way the Romans were governing it). That they call themselves 'Palestinians' is simply an effort to raise sympathy for having been brutally dispossessed of their lands and territories by the UN, USA and 'Israel'.

      Why can't we all just get along?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    56. Re:Fuck Israel by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      ... You're literally bitching that Catholics aren't Lutheran. I get that you're willing to stoop to almost any level in the name of feminism but even I'm shocked that you're this willing to embrace the absurdities of modern left-wing anti-semitism. What's next, accusing us of being Khazars?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    57. Re:Fuck Israel by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Palestine is recognised as a independent state. Therefore this is a war between states.

      One Israeli of my acquaintance stated that "They are not 'Palestinians', they are Arabs and as such they should be happy to live anywhere in the Arab world. Israel isn't part of the Arab world."

      Aside from Australians I have never met a group more prone to racism than Israelis. But unlike Aussies the Israeli men didn't seem to be entirely misogynistic.

      Interesting how Judaism is pretty much the only religion alive today which is almost entirely racial in nature and focussed on parentage. Who your mother is matters very much in Judaism; I don't believe there is any other religion for which your parents, your genealogy, actually matters at all.

      Does Jordan plowing under entire Palestinian villages count as racism in your Israel-hating Euro-fashionable worldview?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    58. Re:Fuck Israel by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Palestine is recognised as a independent state. Therefore this is a war between states.

      One Israeli of my acquaintance stated that "They are not 'Palestinians', they are Arabs and as such they should be happy to live anywhere in the Arab world. Israel isn't part of the Arab world."

      Aside from Australians I have never met a group more prone to racism than Israelis. But unlike Aussies the Israeli men didn't seem to be entirely misogynistic.

      Interesting how Judaism is pretty much the only religion alive today which is almost entirely racial in nature and focussed on parentage. Who your mother is matters very much in Judaism; I don't believe there is any other religion for which your parents, your genealogy, actually matters at all.

      Does Jordan plowing under entire Palestinian villages count as racism in your Israel-hating Euro-fashionable worldview?

      I don't know. Does an African American calling other African Americans 'nigger' count as racism?

      I do know that a lot of the Arab countries are not in the least bit sympathetic to the Palestinians so Israels position that they are just Arabs and should be happy to live anywhere in the Arab world doesn't work in practice for the Palestinians who have basically been left without a nation thanks to the UN.

      Maybe the Turks should re-instate the Ottoman empire, cos the Middle East was a fucking lot more stable under them...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    59. Re:Fuck Israel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There's lots of actual video evidence against the Palestinian side as well. It's a propaganda war.

    60. Re:Fuck Israel by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You're literally bitching that Catholics aren't Lutheran.

      No, I'm just debunking the notion that Jews see any convert as "just as Jewish" as they are. I suppose it's true if you're from a Left-wing progressive congregation, however.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    61. Re:Fuck Israel by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      Oh please, give it a rest.

      This isn't an Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is an Arab-Israeli conflict. Where do you think all the money and political support is coming from?

      In that context, Israel is very much the underdog.

      Better question: Why is it that Palestinians living in Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, etc are legally prohibited from becoming citizens and/or holding down a job? Coincidence? I think not.

    62. Re:Fuck Israel by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      As someone who has actually lived in the region for many years, I can tell you that the videos you are viewing are heavily edited. But don't take my word for it, go see for yourself.

    63. Re:Fuck Israel by lordlod · · Score: 1

      There's lots of actual video evidence against the Palestinian side as well. It's a propaganda war.

      Sure, but we aren't discussing proposals to sensor the Israeli material.

    64. Re:Fuck Israel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Their violence is state-sanctioned, while most Palestinian violence is perpetrated by individuals.

      That's simply not true. Hamas, The PLO, and other organized groups claiming legitimacy have state-sanctioned much of the Palestinian violence.

      By your logic, there was no Civil War in the US, because The Confederacy wasn't recognized by the UN as a state-actor, The Uprising was perpetrated by individuals.

    65. Re:Fuck Israel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Israel locks up millions of people in what amounts to the largest concentration camps in human history

      Concentration camps with no walls. If they wanted to leave, they could. Well until the countries on the other sides sealed the border. Then blamed Israel. They are Egyptian concentration camps as much as they are Israeli.

      But we all hate Jews, so blame Israel. Isn't that the central issue. How do we hate Jews without looking like Jew-haters? Oh yeah, we'll invent a new term "anti-Zionist". We don't hate the sinner, we just hate the sin, and the easiest way to eliminate the sin is to kill all the sinners, who we don't hate.

    66. Re:Fuck Israel by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      You're doing nothing of the sort, asking why there aren't chinese chasidim is like asking why there aren't catholic lutherans or why tibetan buddhists are overwhelmingly tibetan. The kaifeng jews and beta israel by and large are distinct communities which have their own traditions, some of which are spreading throughout the rest of judaism as they continue to integrate back into the larger jewish community.

      There aren't that many converts because Judaism is a non-missionary religion and is still one of the single most marginalized groups in the world, even here in the US more religious hate crimes are committed against Jews than everyone else put together. Thanks in large part due to the left and its "everything old is new again" jews-are-khazars jews-are-oppressors jews-control-the-banks/media/government anti-semitism.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    67. Re:Fuck Israel by aevan · · Score: 1

      Neither is being Israeli; Judaism. is. Which goes to another issue, of conflating race and religion when there is significant overlap.

      That said, most of Japan is Buddhist, they only die Shinto =P

    68. Re:Fuck Israel by Lew-the-nerd · · Score: 1

      They were free to enter and leave, sans barriers and checkpoints after Israel withdrew from Gaza.
      Then Hamas started rocketing Israel and the current situation evolved.

      I am waiting for anyone to point to a situation where the Israel response could have been different and Israeli lives not be threatened.

  3. the new Hezbollah by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    v Google

  4. All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> individual Palestinians have been uploading videos showing violence by Israeli soldiers, including execution-style killings

    I think all Israel would need to do is reference YouTube's own Terms of Service, which prohibit videos featuring illegal acts, right? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_YouTube) Or maybe it could copyright all videos featuring its soldiers and go the German route (where YouTube would be liable for violating copyright by hosting videos). /snark

    1. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why don't they just use Tor to get Uber drivers to hook up some 3D printers to an Arduino they purchased with Bitcoins to create drones that deliver underpaid H1B female STEM workers.

    2. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or like, tell their soldiers to stop the execution-style killings?

    3. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or tell terrorists to stop dressing up like Israeli Soldiers and staging 'execution style killings' for the camera.

      It's really hard to authenticate anything on Youtube. And it's rather easy to stage inflammatory 'drama' videos.

    4. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Yes, take ANYTHING you see anywhere on line with a huge grain of salt....

    5. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Kinda like "Die Endlösung der Palästinenserfrage"?

      Where the heck have I heard that before?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Why don't YouTube just tell them to STFU and let people create and spread whatever?

    7. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Kinda like "Die EndlÃsung der PalÃstinenserfrage"?

      Where the heck have I heard that before?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_Must_Perish!

      Germany Must Perish! is a 104-page book written by Theodore Newman Kaufman, and self-published by him in 1941. The book advocated the genocide through sterilization of all Germans and the territorial dismemberment of Germany. Kaufman founded the Argyle Press in Newark, New Jersey, United States, in order to self-publish this book. He was the sole proprietor of the Argyle Press and it is not known to have published any other works.
      The National Socialist German Workers Party used the book, written by a Jewish author, to support their argument that Jews were plotting against their country.[1]

      Time magazine published a review on March 24, 1941, that compared the book to Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal (1792), a stinging satire that proposed the cannibalistic consumption of poor Irish children, but Times contributors recognized that Kaufman's work was not satirical. It characterizes the work as the "enshrinement of a single sensational idea." "Since Germans are the perennial disturbers of the world's peace," it was in Time's view a modest proposal that "they must be dealt with like any homicidal criminals. But it is unnecessary to put the whole German nation to the sword. It is more humane to sterilize them."[2]
      [3]

      The book has been widely quoted as evidence of a plan for genocide against the German people, and was also the first time the term "Final Solution" was used in the context of genocide. According to one analysis:[11]
      Few Americans have ever heard of a prominent fellow-citizen named Kaufman ... In Germany every child has known of him for a long time. Germans are so well informed about Mr. Kaufman that the mere mention of his name recalls what he stands for. In one of his recent articles Dr. Goebbels wrote, 'Thanks to the Jew Kaufman, we Germans know only too well what to expect in case of defeat.'
      Kaufman was a Manhattan-born Jew and his advocacy of genocide attracted great attention in Germany.[2] The book was denounced as an "orgy of Jewish hatred" and US President Franklin D. Roosevelt's polemical anti-German agitation was seen as having inspired it.[12]

      So yeah.. Where have you heard the final solution THE FIRST TIME?!

    8. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > Or tell terrorists to stop dressing up like Israeli Soldiers and staging 'execution style killings' for the camera.

      It's one of the problems with cellphone videos of police stops in the USA. They're invaluable, especially the raw footage. But it takes very little manipulation to creatively edit them to tell a very different story than the actual events.

    9. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      By 1941 it was already well-known that the Germans were busy eradicating the Jews. It's not like their leader was shy about mentioning it. He wrote a funny book about it once - something about Mine Comfy Chair maybe.

    10. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Or like, tell their soldiers to stop the execution-style killings?

      What are these incidents? I see that the summary claims that videos of "execution-style killings" by Israel soldiers have been taken down, but with all the criticism of Israel I've never before heard of or seen such a video. Israeli representatives might be meeting with Google and Youtube representatives, but the flamebait about "execution-style killings" seems entirely fabricated to generate "discussion".

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    11. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I would guess the removed videos haven't been seen by you because they were removed.

      I doubt that would be it. Here in Israel we have a huge leftist movement which loves to parade those things, not to mention other genuinely interested parties such as the Arabs. I know of many videos that show Israel soldiers' actions towards the Arab population. But an execution-style killing, I've never even heard of such a thing. The assertion that such a video exists seems fabricated. Yes, I am biased towards the Israeli side of the conflict but I'm not a denialist and I completely acknowledge that Israeli soldiers have committed crimes, grievances, abuses, so on and so forth. I am disputing the existence of "execution-style killings" videos that have no basis in fact other than the submitter or an editor decided that mention of such should be part of the inflammable summary.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    12. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      and electric vehicles, space tourism, and IoT!

    13. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      ...what is this? Some kind of protection money? Maybe a protection censorship?

    14. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      do you want more palestinians killed

      I don't really care.

    15. Re:All Israel would need to do is reference TOS? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, yes, Mein Kampf, while it mentions that his view of Jews is not a favorable one, does not outright demand their destruction.

      But by 1941, Hitler not only made a "few" speeches where he explained in no uncertain words what he planned to do with the Jews. The Reichskristallnacht (pogrom night) happened in 1938. Ghettos were established from 1939 onwards. It was hardly a secret what the plan was, no matter what he originally wrote in Mein Kampf.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Google AND YouTube? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    In what respect are they separate entities?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Google AND YouTube? by NotInHere · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Google AND YouTube? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      If you actually believe that was anything more than rearranging deck chairs... then why would you invite "Google" to this meeting about video?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  6. Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are plenty of videos that show what living conditions in the West Bank look like. The most accurate ones are by Corey Gil Shuster, where he talks to the average Palestinian and asks pointed questions.

    Not just arabs, he also asks Jews obnoxious questions posed by his audience. As someone who's been there and lived on both sides of the green line, I can tell you first hand how good his videos are.

    Palestinians will always be the first to lie to you and tell you they're living in squalor. But their digs are first world. The biggest complaint arabs have is checkpoints. The biggest complaint Jews in Israel have is checkpoints. That much, the average person agrees on.

    Gaza is another story. There you have a more extreme class divide, much higher unemployment rates, a lot more poverty; though, still doing pretty good when compared to the rest of the arab world. That said, it's also fair to point out that Gaza hasn't been managed by Israel in almost ten years. And they didn't have to burn their bridges with Egypt. They chose to do that.

    1. Re:Not true by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This post, and many others in this thread have been modded "-1 Troll" just because they don't show Israel as an evil state bent on the destruction of human kind.

      No, it's because it's self-serving bullshit posted by an anonymous coward, and therefore should be ignored at best, or alternately modded down as propaganda. Especially the line "The biggest complaint arabs have is checkpoints" when in fact Israel is bulldozing crops, removing water systems, etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Not true by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      The correct thing is to debate it, not to abuse the mod system, confusing disagreement with trolling in an attempt to hide politically disagreeable, to the modder, viewpoints.

      -1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview -- Not a valid mod option.

      Slashdot had (has?) a metamod system, where moderations are modded, the idea unfair mods will themselves get modded down, such that with enough infractions, shall we say, the original, unfair modder's mods will no longer carry weight.

      Clearly it doesn't work well, and for that matter suffers from the same biases, as -1 troll Israeli Supporter is just as likely to be approved as a fair mod.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Not true by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      That said, it's also fair to point out that Gaza hasn't been managed by Israel in almost ten years.

      Misleading. Gaza hasn't been managed entirely by Israel in almost ten years. However, Israel still manages many things in Gaza, most notably the airspace, the territorial waters, and all non-Egyptian border crossings. A honest description is that Israel will be managing Gaza until the day that Gaza gains sovereignty.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    4. Re:Not true by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Slashdot had (has?) a metamod system,
      Clearly it doesn't work well,

      You can say that again (although don't, you'll probably just be modded troll)

      I just do my best to ignore the moderation system anyway. It's broken by design. When you can be modbombed with funny and overrated it's not even sensible any more.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Good for the goose ... by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Will they also be making preparations to censor Israeli videos that insight violence against Palestine? I'm guessing not since Israel considers that completely acceptable.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Good for the goose ... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You have one of those? Why haven't you published it?

  8. Re:Bad stuff happens in war by sycodon · · Score: 1

    "... free speech has been the rule for centuries..."

    Something many people are determined to change.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  9. Arbiter by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    sadly both sides are acting atrociously. short of turning both Israel and Palestine into a wasteland I am not sure this will ever get better as both sides have demonstrated time and time again they are incapable of living peacefully.

    Almost as if there needed to be an independent arbiter of what videos could be published that didn't live, eat, and breathe an existence biased against the other.

    A video celebrating kids blowing themselves up isn't okay, for example.

  10. jews. always victims in their minds. enough said. by sittingnut · · Score: 1, Insightful

    jews. always victims in their own minds, even when they are the victimizers. enough said.

  11. Bah Israel by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    No videos should EVER pass through any kind of government "Censor"...

    1. Re:Bah Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All israeli media passes through the MILITARY and GOVERNMENT censor. There is no article published in Israel without the approval of the censor. What a democracy!

      Laws on censorship in Israel are based on British emergency regulations from 1945 that apply to domestic media, foreign newspapers and wire service transmissions from or through Israel.

    2. Re: Bah Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Was a sore spot hit? No problem, here are some sources to confirm what you refuse to see.

      Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_Military_Censor

      Source: Military Censorship Is Serving Likud
                                read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/1.638369

      Source: IDF Censor Calls for Probe of 'Leaks' to Haaretz on Israel's Economic Ties With Iran
                                read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.652591

      Source: Israel's Military Censor to Monitor Facebook, Twitter, Blogs
                                read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-s-military-censor-to-monitor-facebook-twitter-blogs-1.427769

      Source: Just Say No to the Censorship of Culture in Israel
                                  read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/1.657245

      Source: Israel's Censorship Frenzy Is Hurting Its Democratic Image
                                read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/1.659545

      Reason below as to why Israel is "negotiating" with Google and Youtube

      Source: Outgoing IDF Chief Censor: Israel's Preventive Censorship Is Becoming Irrelevant
                                read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.668277

  12. Zionists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If Google supports the genocide of Pakistanis by Israelis then I will stop using google as a search engine.

    All of these so-called mass stabbings by little old ladies and 8 year old Pakistanis is sheer bullshit. Meanwhile, Israel is bulldozing their homes over and over again, bombing them, shooting them, by the 10s of thousands all across this summer.

    It's disgusting.

    1. Re:Zionists by cshark · · Score: 2

      I don't know why those mean old Jews won't leave the Pakistanis alone.
      I mean, Pakistan is like 2500 miles away, man. You would think they would want to solve problems closer to home.
      You know, like Alaska.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:Zionists by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      If Google supports the genocide of Pakistanis by Israelis then

      Well, this article is about Palestinians. I don't know of Israelis killing Pakistanis.

      It's also a little unclear what Google/Youtube's response was. Running that article through translate, it's not clear that their meeting resulted in anything more concrete than their saying "if an video violates our terms of service, here's how to report it."

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  13. Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by cshark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think nearly everyone that's commented on this so far has either missed the point, gone off the deep end, or strayed way off topic.

    Israel is not trying to censor speech. They're trying to stop incitement.
    In other words, they're trying to stop predominantly arabic language terrorist recruiting and training material.

    If you have a rudimentary grasp of Arabic, I highly recommend searching for recruiting and training material put out by groups like Hamas, Islamic Jihad, even Daesh. Though, in truth, if you did, you would probably get flagged by homeland security in whatever country you're in. In that pile there are some real classics like How to Make a Pipe Bomb, Optimal Use of a Suicide Vest, and (my favorite) How to Stab a Jew. These videos are already in violation of Youtube terms of service on at least three counts I can think of.

    Nobody is going to take down your stupid "fuck israel" video, and seriously, nobody even wants to.
    Unless you're a senior member of Hamas, your opinions simply don't matter to anyone who has any kind of sway in the government.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

    1. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Israel is not trying to censor speech. They're trying to stop incitement.

      Maybe their soldiers should stop executing people in the streets if they don't want videos of their soldiers executing people in the streets to be on the internet. That would be, like, the fastest way to avoid any more of those videos being posted.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by cshark · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Israel is not trying to censor speech. They're trying to stop incitement.

      Maybe their soldiers should stop executing people in the streets if they don't want videos of their soldiers executing people in the streets to be on the internet. That would be, like, the fastest way to avoid any more of those videos being posted.

      Soldiers in the streets, Israeli tactics right or wrong. Neither of those are the topic of the OP. Why not TRFA before bothering me with this nonsense?

      Okay, so going to assume you want terrorists to disseminate training, propaganda, and ethnically motivated hate speech material so that they can gleefully murder more civilians.

      How many other terror groups outside of Palestine do you wholeheartedly support in this way? Are you a fan of Daesh/ISIS? Do you think El-Shabab are nice guys? How about Boko Haram? All of them have similar grievances with the West, Jews, and Post Enlightenment society in general. Should they also be allowed to spread recruiting and training material in public forums?

      You sure you've thought this through?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    3. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > and (my favorite) How to Stab a Jew

      Like, do they think Jews have a special weak spot, like the end boss to a video game? Is this Gradius?

      "In the name of Mohammad, you must expose the flashing blue core. Position your option to strike that, and spam level 2 Ripple Laser!"

    4. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      On a more serious note, I don't see Israel as any kind of good guy here. The fact that their opponents are, by comparison, monstrous, doesn't excuse what's going on.

      I will also say that you bring up one big thing that is entirely missing- because Arabic is not a common language outside of the middle east, most Americans have no goddamned idea what's going on. Buddhists and Islamists melt together in one pool of "oppressed peoples" that is generally understood only by reflex. Some random powerless hick in Alabama says something insensitive about black folks and that's national news, some soldier of a terrorist regime promises literal genocide and then slaughters people, that's just whatever and you see it linked to on some blog.

    5. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I read the freaking summary and it mentioned Israeli soldiers executing people, so I'm not sure how that's not the topic of the OP. Maybe you are asserting that the summary is inaccurate and doesn't match the article? If that's your argument it would make more sense if you would assert that explicitly so we can follow.

    6. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by cshark · · Score: 2

      On a more serious note, I don't see Israel as any kind of good guy here. The fact that their opponents are, by comparison, monstrous, doesn't excuse what's going on.

      I will also say that you bring up one big thing that is entirely missing- because Arabic is not a common language outside of the middle east, most Americans have no goddamned idea what's going on. Buddhists and Islamists melt together in one pool of "oppressed peoples" that is generally understood only by reflex. Some random powerless hick in Alabama says something insensitive about black folks and that's national news, some soldier of a terrorist regime promises literal genocide and then slaughters people, that's just whatever and you see it linked to on some blog.

      The arabic stuff is pretty heavy.
      They'll say things more openly when they think Westerners aren't watching.
      I've been following it for years.

      Dude, I'm not going to fault you for that, man. I'm not asking for unconditional support of Israel.

      But I do wonder why the West fixates on Israel the way they do. It's not like there would be world peace tomorrow if they solved this one. There are some serious problems with human rights happening all over Africa, Persia, the Far East. Ten actual genocides with shrinking (rather than growing populations) going on today that people couldn't care less about. Not to mention over a dozen military occupations around the world, some of which are longer running and more severe than the one in Israel. Honor Killings, Gender Apartheid, Slavery. These are real problems that cover almost half the planet, but none of them are issues in Israel. And ironically, many of the perpetrators of those crimes are on the UN human rights council. It's absolutely mind blowing.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    7. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Israel is not trying to censor speech. They're trying to stop incitement.
      In other words, they're trying to stop predominantly arabic language terrorist recruiting and training material.

      Occupation is a pretty powerful incitement tool.

    8. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Israel is not trying to censor speech. They're trying to stop incitement.
      In other words, they're trying to stop predominantly arabic language terrorist recruiting and training material.

      Sure sure. And we should censor all the pro-life videos so we can stop terrorist recruiting and training material.

      Since most terrorist killings in the US over the past decade have been white Christian men, we should censor Fox News and close churches, right?

      When has censorship ever been a solution?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But I do wonder why the West fixates on Israel the way they do.

      Because western governments are helping Israel do what it does - and westerners feel responsible for the behavior of their governments.

      Imagine you find out that some disabled kid got beat up at school by some bullies and that your own kid saw it happen but didn't do anything. You'll probably be a bit disappointed but you'll also understand that the world is a harsh place and your kid can't fight every battle.

      On the other hand, imagine that you find out that your kid was one of the bullies who beat up the disabled kid. Well, then, if you have any decency at all, you're going to be very angry. It's one thing to turn a blind eye to injustice. It's quite another to actually perpetrate it.

    10. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > But I do wonder why the West fixates on Israel the way they do.

      Americans ultimately consider Israelis peers. You see it at every level. In the liberal mindset, a bad action from Israel is a modern western democracy overstepping its bounds, and a bad action from Mauritania or whatever will somehow be rewritten to the script of "they were victimized by the big bad west". In the conservative mindset, a bad action from Israel is the concerted efforts of fully aware and intelligent men who know better, and a bad action from many places will just be the rutting of animals, lost in the random noises of nature. In each case, Israel will be held to the same moral standards as America, and much of the world will be held to the same moral standards as a bunch of colic babies.

    11. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Israel is not trying to censor speech. They're trying to stop incitement.

      By censoring speech.
      It's businesses as usual just like trying to discredit journalists writing about Israel that report anything other than roses and sunshine.

      Look up "war propaganda" kids. It's a tool greatly employed by these extremists of the sort that their grandparents had to flee from.

    12. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Wow. Bringing all that baggage in is just asking for a comparison with another bunch that put a minority they didn't like into ghettos and then went in to kill them in the ghettos. Do you really want to keep things on such a level?
      Remember it's not "Israel" that is doing this, just the bunch of fascists currently running it that would have their grandparents recoil in horror. It's also not Daesh living in Gaza.

      The real issue is people in power being utter pricks and exploiting a conflict for their own advancement. While advocating genocide no less.

    13. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Given that Arabs are about 10000000 times more likely to be killed by a fellow Arab, I'd say that genocide from Israel is just something we don't really have to worry about.

    14. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If you can get the stabbers to enter buildings before looking for victims, we'll stop shooting them in the streets. OK?

    15. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear on the incitement bit. It's very well documented that the current PM of Israel aggressively used incitement when his party was in the minority. He advocated violent resistance to the peace process. Many people squarely blame the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on him.

      Beyond that I don't see what the end game is for Israel. Right now it's a two pronged approach. Build a settlement, expand the security zone for safety reasons. Expand the settlement.. expand the security zone. Second prong is to control Jerusalem building by building using fancy lawyering and good old fashioned lawyer-fuckery. Already the West Bank Palestinians are packed so dense into the territory that's left that it makes Tokyo look the middle of North Dakota. Since Israel has all the power in the situation the current government doesn't see a need to seek a political solution. In a couple decades then what? Have your own little genocide?

      tl;dr: I'm an American and I'm sick of dumping billions of dollars into this clusterfuck.

    16. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Yes how dare soldiers "execute" someone who happened to have just murdered several people and was charging them with a weapon.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    17. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      And MSNBC's reporters claimed Israelis murdered an unarmed man right before literally showing him chasing people with a knife.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    18. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Amazing nobody seemed to care when Egypt and Jordan were "occupying" the west bank and gaza then. Also amazing Jordan, despite being made up of over 80% of the original British Mandate's territory, has somehow stopped being "palestine". Even more amazing how "palestine" as it's known today (rather than a generic regional name for Judea) came into existence out of almost nothing around the late 60s.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    19. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      So ALL videos of Israel soldiers committing war crimes are fake? Because MSNBC showed exactly that one video?

      Oh, lookie - I have a fake WWII journal written by a fake Jew. That means Holocaust has never happened!

    20. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But I do wonder why the West fixates on Israel the way they do.

      By that, do you mean, I do wonder why western countries keep pouring money into Israel in spite of their poor record on human rights? It's because we're intentionally funding their bad behavior to keep down the muzzies. As long as we keep Israel going, we keep that region at war with itself. It's not because we give one tenth of one fuck about the Jews. If we did, we would have entered WWII a lot sooner, when we first knew about the holocaust. Instead, we waited until our "allies" had their asses pounded, then moved in and picked up the scraps... and the economic concessions.

      And ironically, many of the perpetrators of those crimes are on the UN human rights council.

      What's ironic is that the members of the UN security council are the nations which most commonly compromise the security of other nations. For example, by founding the nation of Israel smack dab in the middle of them, and then pouring money into that hole for decades.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who decides where the line is? What about videos by US militia training people how to use weapons? Would a recruitment video for a dangerous cult like Scientology, that engages in criminal activity and brainwashing, be banned?

      I fully accept that Daesh recruitment videos may lead to there being more terrorism, but I'd prefer to use my own freedom of speech to counter them instead of going down the censorship route. Freedom is very hard won, and not to be given away lightly, especially in exchange for some perceived safety.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      But I do wonder why the West fixates on Israel the way they do.

      Because we set that country up, with what we thought were reasonable borders. Then Israel expanded. And that expansion and its enforcement has created a lot of hostility against the West for continuing to support Israel with weapons and money.

      Solving the Israel problem would solve a lot of other problems and reduce tensions in the area greatly. Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to do, because Israel opposes everything that has any chance of eventually fixing the situation. Really, what is Israel's end game here? Eventually the Palestinians give up, accept their little scraps of land and poverty, and the war is over? And then Iran decides to decommission its nuclear reactors and renounce Islam, forgetting all the bad history and need for energy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Who decides where the line is?

      Youtube/Google management?

      From what I gather that's why Israeli Foreign Affairs Deputy Minister is meeting them and not the management of McDonald's or Obama.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    24. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Your slip is showing.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    25. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Maybe their soldiers should stop executing people in the streets

      Like http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

      There were protests in the streets after the shooting. She was shot while trying to stab someone, and the shooting in the streets was condemned. Israel should just stab themselves, right? Save everyone else the trouble.

    26. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So ALL videos of Israel soldiers committing war crimes are fake?

      Yes. So far every single one was shown fake.

      Oh, lookie - I have a fake WWII journal written by a fake Jew. That means Holocaust has never happened!

      Proving one wrong is meaningless. Ann Frank lived. Ann Frank died. Nobody has proven that false. And doing so would be required for your assertion to be correct.

    27. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Yes. So far every single one was shown fake.

      Really? Like this one, perhaps?

      So we have videos of Israel soldiers beating people at checkpoints: http://palsolidarity.org/2007/... They have not been proven false. We have videos of Israel soldiers shooting immobilized people: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/10/... They have not been proven false. We have videos of Israel soldiers shooting girls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... The have not been proven false.

      I'm sorry, but your denial is just as bad as Holocaust denial.

      Oh, and if we're talking about how these obviously sub-human Arabic people speak their true feelings only in Arabic (that obviously nobody civilized can understand), then you should look at Russian-language Jewish émigrée forums. Phrases like "painted monkeys" or "just shoot them all" and "perhaps genocide is not such a bad idea" are quite common.

    28. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I made it through your first video. "beating" looked more like a finger poke, and the video was obviously edited, with the spitting shown multiple times, with cuts, gaps and pauses for effect.

      When that's the first and best example of abuse, yawn.

      Ah yes, saying "Israel isn't as bad as the anti-Semitic racists claim" is a Holocaust denial. I'm the devil, for being able to look at things objectively. That's an offensive skill these days.

    29. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Cyberax · · Score: 1
      Yes, sure. Here's your Nazi swastika, Herr Goebbels is proud of you. How about denying UN reports: http://www.un.org/apps/news/st... ?

      Oh, they are obviously fake.

      Ah yes, saying "Israel isn't as bad as the anti-Semitic racists claim" is a Holocaust denial.

      Ah, favorite tactics of neo-Nazis in Israel. It's getting old.

      Being against Israel does not mean that one is antisemitic. But let's try to flip it - I think that you are anti-Arabic, since you clearly don't support the Palestinian state actions. That of course means that you want to commit a genocide of all Arabs.

      I'm the devil, for being able to look at things objectively. That's an offensive skill these days.

      No, you're just a pseudo-Nazi. Except that you are targeting a different ethnic group. "Israel isn't that bad" might have worked 15 years ago. Not now. Now we see that it's just as bad as Arabic states around it.

    30. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are a Jew-hating Nazi. I want fair treatment for both sides. That's what separates us. You support only one side. I'm not as close minded, or Jew-hating.

    31. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No, I don't hate Jews or any other nationality or ethnic group. I don't like the Israel government and its policies. Do you see the difference? And I futher notice that you don't deny war crimes listed in the UN report.

      And as for your "equal treatment"... Do you want to surround Israel with a wall, that separates it from international waters and other countries? With checkpoints manned by racist thugs that beat up people at random. With surrounding states grabbing Israel's land occasionally (and evicting its current occupants) and sometimes bombing it with no chance for Israel to retaliate or defend itself?

      No, you're not for "equal treatment". You are an apartheid supporter, who is PERFECTLY fine with the current status quo. If you actually were for an "equal treatment", you'd be on the streets protesting the official racist politics of the current Israel government (do you remember that "Vote for me, or Arabs will vote for somebody else"?).

    32. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      That's literally exactly what ALREADY HAPPENS to Israel and what you're demanding be allowed to happen with no recourse whatsoever. You aren't criticising government policies you're attacking the very existence of Israel as a state, and you're doing it with double standards so outrageous and hypocritical that the only reasonable explanation is pure anti-semitism.

      If YOU were actually for equal treatment you'd be up in arms over the fact that Hamas literally exists for the sole purpose of genocide (and even quotes the Protocols), Fatah routinely glorifies terrorists and incites further attacks, and even Jordan officially teaches that jews murder babies and use their blood to make matza. But you're not. You have no problem with the constant invasions by surrounding arab states for the sole purpose of genocide, you have no problem with the literal thousands of bombings and terrorist attacks for the sole purpose of genocide, you have no problem with the universal anti-semitism of the entire arab world. You're fine with anything and everything done TO israel no matter how extreme, and refuse to tolerate anything Israel does no matter how reserved. Israel is the only country in the entire world that is condemned for protecting its civilians from thousands of bombings, the only country in the entire world blamed as the bad guy because not enough israelis die when Israel is attacked to satisfy your bloodlust.

      You throw around words like "apartheid" and "nazi" when there are probably more arabs and muslims living in Israel with full rights of citizenship, serving at all levels of the military and government, than there are jews living in the entire freaking arab world put together. Meanwhile in every single neighboring arab state there are crowds screaming for the death of all jews everywhere, demanding the eradication of Israel, and governments teaching age old myths like blood libel and the protocols as fact.

      As for your UN report it's bullshit to put it mildly. This is the same UN whose employees publish pro-terrorist anti-semitic materials, the same UN that ignores african genocides to condemn Israel dozens of times, the same UN that condemns Israel more than every other country on earth COMBINED, the same UN that claims all of Judaism's most holy sites are not Jewish but rather Muslim holy sites, the same UN composed of arab states that throw gays off the tops of buildings and lash women for being raped.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    33. Re:Sorry guys, Israel doesn't care what you think. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      That's literally exactly what ALREADY HAPPENS

      Bullshit. Israel is not isolated by a wall from other countries (including from the sea) and nobody is slowly strangling it by annexing cutting off parts of it.

      not enough israelis die when Israel is attacked to satisfy your bloodlust.

      You are insisting that keeping Palestinians inside a fucking ghetto is the only alternative to Israeli genocide. That's bullshit and you're just as bad as fucking Nazis who kept Jews inside ghettos during the WWII.

      You throw around words like "apartheid" and "nazi" when there are probably more arabs and muslims living in Israel with full rights of citizenship

      Bullshit. Palestinian citizens of Israel have no rights at all. Neither can a Palestinian citizen of another country move to Israel and get an automatic citizenship.

      As for your UN report it's bullshit [nytimes.com] to put it mildly.

      No, it's not. It documents dozens of Israel war crimes, and people who ordered them should be hanged, just like Nazis after Nuremberg trials. Ditto for other constant human rights violations by Israeli police and IDF.

      The world should impose sanctions on Israel, like we did with Iran. They should be lifted only when Israel conducts at least a couple of free democratic elections involving ALL of its citizens (including Palestinian ones) and surrenders its nuclear weapons.

  14. Re:Bad stuff happens in war by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2

    The fact is this:
    If the Palestinians first stopped firing rockets to made peace, the Jews would put away all their rockets and make peace.
    If, however, the Jews first stopped firing rockets to make peace, the Palestinians would just continue the attacks until Israel is destroyed.

    Both sides are guilty of atrocities, but this being Slashdot... I'd rather the side that has an industry of designing CPUs for Intel beat the side that has a bizarre totalitarian religion that routinely generates suicide bombers.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  15. Re:Yassar Is Rolling In His Grave! by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as long as the students at these colleges in the states today dont get to decide whats offensive we should be good

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  16. Re:Bad stuff happens in war by cshark · · Score: 2

    I usually have faith in the posters on Slashdot, but not on this issue. I think it's going to be easy to see that the American educational system has failed us in profound and meaningful ways.

    I hope I'm wrong, but I think you're more likely to see a lot of pent up ignorant self involved anger on this topic, than any attempts at an honest, serious discussion of any actual issues related to Israel.

    In the threads above, the readers can't even tell the difference between what is meant by incitement, and what is considered speech. They keep tacking on things that really make me wonder if they have any understanding of the subject at all. It's a very simple distinction.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  17. Re:Bad stuff happens in war by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Israel is fighting an existential war of self defense.
    Yet if I put a different hat on, I see Palestine fighting an existential war of self defense.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  18. Re:Yassar Is Rolling In His Grave! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    as long as the students at these colleges in the states today dont get to decide whats offensive we should be good

    Watch it buddy, I'm already 72% triggered according to my smart watch app. So glad I connected these 3d printed jazz hands to the IoT, please remotely activate them for me to signify that you're checking your privilege.

  19. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by cshark · · Score: 1

    Wise words.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  20. You're right on that: Israel doesn't care by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think nearly everyone that's commented on this so far has either missed the point, gone off the deep end, or strayed way off topic.

    Israel is not trying to censor speech. They're trying to stop incitement.

    ... by censorship.

    In other words, they're trying to stop predominantly arabic language terrorist recruiting and training material.

    Trying to stop people from saying something you don't want them to say is known as "censorship". What you're saying here is "I think that in this case censorship is justified."

    I admit to some mixed feelings here. I'd like to see videos recruiting people to terrorism pulled down... but I'm skeptical about giving anybody the authority to decide which videos, because that authority can be misused. As has been pointed out, freedom of speech really isn't freedom of speech until it includes allowing people to say things that you personally don't like.

    I'm afraid I'd err on the side of freedom here. I don't know if I can trust the government-- any government, but least of all the Israeli government--with the power to decide what to censor.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:You're right on that: Israel doesn't care by cshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Great comment Geoff.
      The thing to remember here is that yes, they are asking for special review powers. And there's good reason to be skeptical there.
      But, they aren't asking Youtube to remove anything that's not already in violation of their community standards (I think they us community standards at yt, not sure).

      And historically, Israel does have a pretty good track record here. The domestic newspapers routinely post anti-government material, op-eds that would make you blush, and they even allow Parliament members who have actually been guilty of treason (MK Zoabi) to serve, and say whatever they like on the floor of the Knesset. Granted, they don't have absolute freedom of speech -- but we don't have that in America anymore either.

      Not saying they can do no wrong. Just that I don't think this would affect anyone who's not recruiting for a terrorist organization like Hamas or Daesh. If you are recruiting for a known terrorist organization, well... I suppose that's your business. You've got bigger problems at that point than what's on Youtube.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

  21. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by paiute · · Score: 1
    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  22. Don't they watch American TV? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    We've already determined in the US that internet videos cannot incite violence. We then investigated that possibility (at least) an additional 7 times after determining that fact, and kept coming to the same conclusion. We've thrown many millions of dollars into this question, I thought the Israelis were frugal enough with their money to learn from this and avoid making the same mistake.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  23. Re:Bad stuff happens in war by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    You don't have to favor the Palestinians to oppose censorship.

  24. How in Sam Hill ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... is a meeting going to do any fucking good?

    Google and Israel can censor until they are blue in the face, but the workarounds will bypass that.

    What's the REAL reason behind this shit?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  25. Does this article have any credibility at all? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    "Various sources?" Come on now. How do we know the entire thing is not made up?

    Smells like political propaganda to me.

    And this is from a website called: middleeastmonitor.com

    Who are the contributors to that site?

    Honorary Advisers to the Middle East Monitor
    Dr Salman Abu Sita, Palestinian author and member of the Palestinian National Council
    Lord Nazir Ahmed of Rotherham, member of The House of Lords
    Baroness Jennifer Tonge of Kew, member of The House of Lords
    Dr Maria Holt, Lecturer of Democracy and Islam in the Centre for the Study of Democracy in the University of Westminster
    Oliver McTernan, Co-Founder and Director of the Forward Thinking organisation
    Professor Tariq Ramadan, Professor at Oxford University

    1. Re:Does this article have any credibility at all? by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      It may be a Pro Arab group. So what? Should an Anti-Arab group stand up and present the same thing? No of course not, they wouldn't. That would be ridiculous. Nobody does that. In which case, this group stood up regarding their own interests and presented or promotes their side.

      And certainly Pro-Israel groups have equal chance to present their side the same way.

      It's up to the media and average people to hear all sides and decide if they believe it or not and wish to support it or not.

      --
      Sig for hire.
  26. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone killed my wife and children... I would not be above genocide utilizing a bioweapon, and I would be capable of building such a thing, targeted to a specific set of tribes or genomes

    Good luck with that one. The problem here is that the two ethnic groups are almost the same: they're both Semitic people, and are extremely closely related genetically. Any bio-weapon targeting Jewish genetics is also going to affect Arabs, and vice-versa.

    Something like that might work if, for instance, the Nigerians were really pissed at the Chinese. But with most cases where some ethnic group really hates some other ethnic group, the two groups are more similar to each other than to anyone else. It's kinda like all those cases you see where there's a family-run restaurant, but two brothers in the family have a big fight and suddenly there's two restaurants, the original one, and then a new one across the street with the exact same menu and almost same name.

  27. Israel is defending itself by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    against Muslim aggression.

    Israel is entirely willing to live, in peace, with Arabs.

    However, Muslims have hated Jews since the prophet Mohammad walked the earth. Hating Jews is commanded in Islam.

    Hamas has launched thousands of rockets into Isreal. Hamas has Jew hatred written into Hamas's charter.

    1. Re:Israel is defending itself by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      against Muslim aggression.
      Israel is entirely willing to live, in peace, with Arabs.

      Quiz time...
      Who said: "If I'm elected, there will be no Palestinian state"

      However, Muslims have hated Jews since the prophet Mohammad walked the earth. Hating Jews is commanded in Islam.

      Welcome to the club, lots of crazy shit can be found in all the religious texts.

      Hamas has launched thousands of rockets into Isreal. Hamas has Jew hatred written into Hamas's charter.

      Israel killed more people in a single hour of Military conflict than all the rockets combined over three decades. Anyone who really wants peace will actively seek to move beyond tit for tat and excuses to continue war.

    2. Re:Israel is defending itself by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Don't take politics so seriously. Bibi could have said the exact opposite, and would have if it would have increased his election chances. Don't confuse political rhetoric with coincidence. There won't be a "Palestinian" state until all Jews residing in Israel have been killed. I kinda don't blame Israelis for taking exception to that.

    3. Re:Israel is defending itself by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is not enough civilians are dying to justify actually doing something about the literal thousands of rockets, mortars,and bombs indiscriminately targeting them. You're saying Israel should be punished for doing more than any other country on the face of the earth to protect civilians from terrorist attacks, that Israel should be penalized for developing the Iron Dome and deploying it.

      Tell me do you hold any other country to this kind of standard? How many Israelis need to die to satisfy your bloodlust?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re:Israel is defending itself by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2

      Islam wants to convert us, lying and cheating and violence against non Muslims is justified for that cause.

      Judaism want to rule us, lying and cheating and violence against goy is generally far more permissible than against fellow Jews (especially the lying and cheating part).

      Reciprocity is not high on the agenda for either.

    5. Re:Israel is defending itself by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Jews are far more than average represented in the left, look at something like the ECTR.

    6. Re:Israel is defending itself by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Jews are more represented on the left, but that doesn't mean that the left hasn't picked up anti-semitism with both hands and started chugging the kool-aid for all it's worth. Between crowds of hundreds shouting "slaughter the jews" and calling for the eradication of Israel, people throwing around terms like "ethnic cleansing" and "apartheid state", and even the return of age old classics like the "khazar" myth and blood libel it's feeling more like the 30s every day.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    7. Re:Israel is defending itself by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      "No Palestinian State" does not mean they are going to eradicate them by default.

      For what little its worth the above was never my intent. It is pretty hard to see how any serious person could interpret it in such a way.

      It means, in context (which you've taken it out of *for some reason*), that they don't want an officially recognized State full of people who have professed a willingness to die in order to exterminate all the Jews including the ones in Israel.

      The point is they are not serious about peace because they will not accept the only hope for peace ... a separate autonomous "Palestinian state".

    8. Re:Israel is defending itself by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is not enough civilians are dying to justify actually doing something about the literal thousands of rockets, mortars,and bombs indiscriminately targeting them.

      What your saying has nothing to do with my comment. My only point is both sides have plenty of blood on their hands. Israel is not innocent. Using the bullshit of what one side did as an excuse to do nothing solves nothing.

      You're saying Israel should be punished for doing more than any other country on the face of the earth to protect civilians from terrorist attacks

      Keep tugging on those imaginary strings. It is telling the whole world except North America and Australia support recognizing the state of Palestine.

      Everyone is tired of Israel / Palestine conflict and the bullshit going on both sides. No party to the conflict is innocent. The only viable option is the "two state solution".

      that Israel should be penalized for developing the Iron Dome and deploying it.

      Iron Dome was developed by the United States of Israel.

    9. Re:Israel is defending itself by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Jews are more represented on the left, but that doesn't mean that the left hasn't picked up anti-semitism with both hands and started chugging the kool-aid for all it's worth. Between crowds of hundreds shouting "slaughter the jews" and calling for the eradication of Israel, people throwing around terms like "ethnic cleansing" and "apartheid state", and even the return of age old classics like the "khazar" myth and blood libel it's feeling more like the 30s every day.

      Apartheid state is what Israel will be in the next few decades if it continues to make no serious effort toward peace.

    10. Re:Israel is defending itself by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Israel literally offered Yasser Arafat every single thing the arabs have demanded EXCEPT for genocide and the eradication of Israel. He walked out rather than accept a total capitulation because the idea of allowing jews to live was that intolerable. Even the Saudis placed the sole blame for the lack of a peace agreement on him.

      There are more arabs, christian and muslim, living in Israel and serving at all levels of society and government than there are Jews living in the rest of the Arab world combined. There are literally members of the Knesset who support Hamas, the equivalent of having an ISIS supporter in the US Senate. Israel is as far from an apartheid state as you can possibly get. You want apartheid? Go look at every arab country.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    11. Re:Israel is defending itself by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      We have a two state solution, the second state is called "Jordan" and was founded using over 80% of the land making up the original British Mandate of Palestine at the exact same time and from the exact same act that founded Israel. Somehow though people only ever seem to be opposed to Israel's legitimacy. Gee I wonder why.

      Despite this Israel still offered to meet literally every single demand ever made except for the total annihilation of Israel and the Jews and Yasser Arafat, who is egyptian fyi and not "palestinian", walked out. The only "viable" solution to the arabs is genocide, it's literally written right in Hamas charter and the leaders of the arab world (to say nothing of the mobs in the street) are more than willing to say this in plain language. They don't want a two state solution, they don't want peace, they want to kill all the jews.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  28. Educate urselves: Palestinian/Israeli conflict by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I am seeing massive ignorance about the conflict,

    This short video is good starting point.

    The History of the Middle East Conflict in 11 Minutes
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZY8m0cm1oY

    1. Re:Educate urselves: Palestinian/Israeli conflict by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Can we have a "whites only" drinking fountain that doesn't discriminate against people who aren't white. Can we discriminate in favor of one race without discriminating against other races?

      There are practical limits to drinking fountain discrimination. Perhaps with CV algorithms they could be made to discriminate against people who don't look white but this seems like a whole heck of a lot of extra work.

      Drinking fountains primarily discriminate against either hobbits or giants.. also if in Orac is ahead of you in line dehydration is likely to be preferable.

      It may be possible to use golomb rulers (Not a Golem or Gollum) to optimally define heights of a series of drinking fountains with optional stepping stones to allow all races to be optimally addressed. If there is just one fountain your pretty much screwed.

      My own answer, after much thought, is actually "no". So I don't really see how the history is relevant to finding a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem.

      From remarks of politicians history appears to be leveraged primarily as an excuse for inaction and or the continuance of war.

      But a much better solution would be a single ethnically neutral country that didn't discriminate at all. Don't call it Israel.

      Or more realistically kick everyone out and set off some kind of ecological disaster which renders the land uninhabitable for the next 2000 years so nobody will want to go back.

    2. Re:Educate urselves: Palestinian/Israeli conflict by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      > But a much better solution would be a single ethnically neutral country that didn't discriminate at all.

      That is Israel. Arabs have full citizenship rights in Israel. Israel is a secular nation. Israel has never had a problem with living with Arabs, it's Arabs that are dedicated to wiping Israel off the map, and killing all Jews.

      > Don't have any "rights" of "return" that are based on race or ethnicity or religion.

      The idea of Israel is to provide a very tiny, but safe, space for Jews. If you remember, modern Israel was created right after WWII.

      > Don't put things like marriage under some kind of religious authority

      I agree, that was a mistake. But, certainly you cannot claim that Muslims nations are any better.

      > Just have one (democratic) country with equal rights and justice for all.

      That is Israel, everybody has the same rights. Which is much more than a nation like Saudi would ever offer.

    3. Re:Educate urselves: Palestinian/Israeli conflict by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, but I don't see how your response has anything what-so-ever to do with the link I posted.

      Maybe you should watch the actual video? It is only 11 minutes long, and very informative.

      The History of the Middle East Conflict in 11 Minutes
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZY8m0cm1oY

  29. Inciting violence or not??? Take it down too!! by crastyass · · Score: 1

    A fictional video blaming Canadian Palestinians for violence towards Jewish Canadians...none of these events happened in Canada and I personally think it is in bad taste. Especially when they use it on their website: http://www.cija.ca/takeactioni... https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  30. Re:Bad stuff happens in war by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Both sides are guilty of atrocities, but this being Slashdot... I'd rather the side that has an industry of designing CPUs for Intel beat the side that has a bizarre totalitarian religion that routinely generates suicide bombers.

    One has a totalitarian martyrhood culture, and the other is using them as substitute culprits to avenge the Holocaust on. Why side with either? Unless, of course, your apocalyptic cult sees Israel as a key to its end-of-the-world prophecies, which seems to be the case for alarmingly many people.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  31. Re:Citation [Re:Violence!] by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    alternet? That's your citation? I'm not gonna say it didn't happen but you still haven't provided a citation. Alternet is little more than a comic book.

  32. Here are a couple of more objective news accounts by nbauman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, YouTube removed videos which were encouraging Palestinians to kill Israelis (and were actually faked), and were clearly in violation of TOS. The stories don't say anything about removing videos of real Israeli attacks on Palestinians. If you search YouTube for "israeli human rights abuses", you'll still find lots of hits.

    http://www.reuters.com/article...
    Israel says Facebook, YouTube videos encouraging Palestinian attacks

    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-...
    YouTube Removes Inciting Videos Portraying Murder of Jews, at Israel's Request
    Hamas uploaded one video dramatizing stabbing death of two Jews, while cartoon reenacted murder of Eitam and Naama Henkin in West Bank.
    Reuters and Haaretz
    Oct 08, 2015 8:06 PM

    Exaggeration works to the advantage of both sides.

    The Israeli organizations like to say, we talked to Google and were successful in getting Google to remove videos, we're effective, and please contribute money to our ongoing effort.

    The Palestinian organizations like to say, the Israelis are censoring Google, support our organization and fight this.

  33. War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article makes it sound like Israel is trying to silence the Palestinians from presenting their side. This is not the case (at least in this particular instance)

    Fair enough for this case, giving you the benefit of the doubt, but there are plenty of situations where the corrupt bunch of extremists currently in charge of Israel do so.
    One sided war propaganda from a bunch that very much resemble what the Jewish people had to flee from is the order of the day. If this keeps up Israel is going to be treated like South Africa was some years back.

    1. Re:War propaganda for years by Sun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Please send me examples to my private mail (I think this is off topic here).

      Just because bad reporting is not limited to Slashdot (the linked English article is below bad) does not mean the subject here isn't worth discussing. I think the discussion totally misses the real subject matter. There are a host of important things to consider here, and I doubt any will be discussed in the comments, mostly because the subject matter says "Israel".

      Does it make sense to try and block incitement to violence? Are there freedom of speech implications here? Would such a block, even assuming it would hold and be effective for Youtube and Facebook, even help?

      What are Youtube and Facebook's moral and legal obligations here? Does the fact that both have development centers in Israel change anything?

      Shachar

    2. Re:War propaganda for years by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      What kind of propaganda is two-sided?

    3. Re:War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please send me examples to my private mail

      I'll send you a dollar and you can buy a fucking newspaper.
      What is it with people pretending to be ignorant to push a point? It's very offensive.

    4. Re:War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does it make sense to try and block incitement to violence?

      That excuse can be used to block any sort of negative reporting and you know it.

    5. Re:War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 1

      A bit thin skinned I see - you marked me foe just for that!
      If you are going to go for full political tribalism on a tech site then expect a bit of criticism.

    6. Re:War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It is a very appropriate response for a deliberate attempt to mislead that depends upon ignorance. You are preying on the weak.
      What's with the political propaganda shit on a tech site anyway? The article is a troll and it's certainly brought partisan responses out of the woodwork.

    7. Re:War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I take great offence when someone both lies to me and treats me like I'm an idiot that should believe the lie.
      If you don't want to be treated like scum don't act like scum.

    8. Re:War propaganda for years by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I apologise for mistaking you for someone interested in a civilized discussion. Will not happen again.

      Shachar

      Grow up.

      There is no "civilized discussion" in this matter.

      Simple observation shows that there is no peace in the area because neither side wants peace. This is mere continuation of some ancient family dysfunction among people with violent predispositions.

      Given the length of time it has gone on, it shows that both sides somehow enjoy the conflict.

      And neither take any politically biased matters into consideration, only simple observation.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:War propaganda for years by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Would such a block, even assuming it would hold and be effective for Youtube and Facebook, even help?

      Ask the Spanish Maquis.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    10. Re:War propaganda for years by Sun · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for civilized discussion in this forum. Obviously, even that is too much to ask.

      Regardless, saying "both sides are to blame" is just a generic dismissal. If you do not want to conduct this discussion, by all means stay out of it.

      Shachar

    11. Re:War propaganda for years by Sun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think anything from the 1950's is comparable to post-communication revolution era.

      Some of the incitations are Palestinian Authority sponsored. I guess those can change given enough political pressure (which, if recent years are any indication, no one is inclined to provide). The majority of this wave, however, is fuelled by either grass root, or (more likely) parties like Hammas, which are not as susceptible to such pressure.

      Shachar

    12. Re:War propaganda for years by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for civilized discussion in this forum. Obviously, even that is too much to ask.

      You are displaying exactly that you want no other viewpoint but your own. Accuse anyone who disagrees with you into some sort of animal, not civilized, in comparison to you.

      Because no matter what side you are on There is not one thing civulized about the middle east conflict. It is barbarism at it's zenith.

      Regardless, saying "both sides are to blame" is just a generic dismissal.

      The Israelis and the Palestinians are in a classic co-dependency role. Generic or not, it is an acceptable explanation for the conflict.

      If you do not want to conduct this discussion, by all means stay out of it.

      Shachar

      By all means, no. I tell you something you do not want to hear, so I am somehow uncivilized, and you drop back to this weird passive aggressive aggreived mode, where you won't accept any viewpoint but your own. most unbecoming indeed, Sun, and not fooling anyone.

      Despite a transparently arrogant air of civility while you play this game -you Sun - are a perfect example of how the middle east co-dependency syndrome works. I don't play that game. I've always gotten along with my neighbors.

      You don't want to hear that, probably because the truth often is not in line with your history or what you have been taught.

      Just curious - which "side" am I on in this conflict?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:War propaganda for years by Sun · · Score: 1

      This is not passive aggressive. This is me stating my point of view. I'm sorry you somehow find it offensive.

      dbIII somehow found me asking him to elaborate on why he claimed a certain claim as offensive. That is not how a civilized discussion takes place. That was my claim. You seem to conflate the discussion about a certain aspect of the conflict with the conflict itself. That is not uncivilized (and I don't think I accused you of that, but if I did, please accept my apology). It is, however, without sense to me.

      To the point, however, I can see where the Palestinian depend on the conflict. It keeps money flowing in from supporters. It keeps internal discussion away from the PA's ability to function as a state/autonomy/whatever, as well as their corruption. Above all else, it provides the Palestinian leadership a catch-all scapegoat for everything that goes bad (it's Israel's occupation's fault).

      I am more at a loss to see where Israel's interest in keeping the conflict is. Please do elaborate.

      Shachar

    14. Re:War propaganda for years by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      This is not passive aggressive. This is me stating my point of view. I'm sorry you somehow find it offensive.

      Your passive aggressiveness is showing again. That really is inadequate as a discussion technique.

      Good day Sun.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re:War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 1

      dbIII somehow found me asking him to elaborate

      In the form of an accusation that what I stated never happens despite it being very frequent and obvious to all. You asked me to "elaborate" by calling me a lair and treating me like a naive idiot.
      I know that in war the "lesser evil" becomes the necessary, but pretending everything is sunshine and roses with the evil never happening is the act of disgusting scum.

    16. Re:War propaganda for years by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Please do try to keep track of a thread before making a comment like that - try looking two posts above the "original comment" to see an earlier comment where I gave Sun the benefit of the doubt on one item and he replied with a denial of the obvious - thus leading to the form "original comment" which should be expected by anyone that deliberately tries to mislead the kiddies on this site for blatant political purposes.

    17. Re:War propaganda for years by Sun · · Score: 1

      My exact words were:

      Please send me examples to my private mail (I think this is off topic here).

      I did not call you a liar. I just asked you to provide specifics so we can discuss. In fact, I did not voice any opinion at all about the matter, as I'd like to have discussion based on facts, not opinions.

      Shachar

  34. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, you believe the issue here is about choosing a side? To a certain extent that might be true. But let's be fair, until the UN renounces Israel's sovereignty, takes over, disarms the entire region and enforces peace.. preferably peacefully while treating all the people fairly and with respect, there will be no right side. I don't give a shit if you favor Israelis or Palestinians. They're both a disgrace and behave like something out of a grapes of wrath type experiment.

    The issue here is whether or not a nation like Israel should be allowed to censor "their enemy" on YouTube and other sites. I have no love for anyone who preaches hate like the Palestinians and Israelis do. I have no respect for anyone who would look their brother in the eye and see an animal when what they really see is a mirror. But, for a moment, imagine Israel being able to claim the videos you site as instigating violence... they do... only a fool would disagree with you on this. There are many videos like this and if I believed I had the right to have them taken down, I would.

    But, what about the video of a crying child who lost his mother or father or sister to bombings and raids led by the Israelis... when that child cries out in fear and terror and agony that the Israelis did this to him. That he hates the people who took someone he loves from him. Would you also agree that this video would insight violence? Would you not agree that only a heartless man would not want to cry for this child? Would you not agree that a fighter would see this as his duty to avenge? Would you agree that this video should be taken down too? I personally wouldn't. A video like this should be seen.

    At which point between these extremes do we decide which video is appropriate and which insights violence and which insights violence and should be seen... and which ones shouldn't.

    This IS NOT an issue of black and white. While I sympathize with the Israeli leadership that these videos are easily a weapon being used against them... I also sympathize with the Palestinians who lack better channels to communicate and sadly lack better things to communicate about. What's worse is, I feel deeply for the Israelis and the Palestinians who actually believe they are doing the right thing because some fool in "their leadership" has convinced them that this is how they should think and behave.

    Israel is a completely failed experiment and a place which could be a world wide symbol of peace representing some of the biggest religions is a cesspool of steaming shit instead. Quit picking a side like Israel or Palestine. Instead fight to have them both dissolved and if the US and UN are going to pay for "peace keeping" in the region, then treat it like post-was Germany and just take the damn thing over and treat it as a haven instead and bring peace there.

  35. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    Why would someone kill your wife and children?

  36. They place is at war, you can't by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...tell the other side not to wage war. If you don't want war, then give them their land back and make a peace deal.

  37. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not generally... there is almost no Semite in modern Jews anymore. There are some left of course, but the blood line is far from being so pure. From thousands of years of mixing the bloodlines during their nomadic movements throughout the world, there's almost nothing left. Chances are, the Jews have far more in common with the Russian, Polish and Germans than with the Arabs. Israeli Jews have practically nothing to do with the ancient Jews. It probably would work.

    Of course, you can't dispute this with the Jews... these are people who actually believe in things like the Cohan gene. For people who don't know, Cohans and Levis are bloodlines which probably went extinct 2000 years ago and were extremely rare to begin with as these were the direct descendants of the holiest and the most powerful of people in the Israeli empire. Over history, it has been a great goal for many Jews who were known as Israelites which translates correctly to "The bloodline which designates thee as just another schmuck" to promote themselves to Cohan or Levi by never clearly answering which bloodline they were members of and making enough money to move somewhere else and pretend to be either holy or powerful and change their name to Cohen or Levi in the process. A very important additional benefit of this would be to try and arrange a wife who would make good children for their sons and instead of choosing from the generally short and chubby semetic line, they would somehow stumble upon a man willing to allow his daughter to convert for the right price.

    Judaism is one of the more ruthless religions due to their internal conflict... bickering... even hatred of each other. It's as bad as going to Church on Christmas and 95% of the people who go there celebrate the humble life and birth of their lord by dressing up as expensively as possible and showing off their new cars.

  38. Re:Bad stuff happens in war by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    I think your hat is about 17 sizes too small. It seems to have forced your brain out through your ears.

    "Palestine" has never existed as an independent state. The area of the West Bank under dispute belonged to Jordan until 1967. They have since relinquished their claim to the land. "Palestine" cannot be fighting a war for existence no matter which hat you put on, because "Palestine" has never existed. The Arabs in the West Bank are Arabs, not "Palestinians". They have never had an independent nationality, and many of them hold Jordanian citizenship.

  39. Re: jews. always victims in their minds. enough sa by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  40. As an Israeli, I would LIKE Youtube to keep them by major.tal · · Score: 1

    I (and most Israeli's I know) want Youtube and Google to keep any video that shows improper behavior by soldiers towards Palestinians. It keeps us honest and lets us prosecute criminals, even if they are wearing uniforms. This happens once in a while yet much less often than you would think and not at the scale of atrocities done by the US, French, British and Russian forces in Syria, Afghanistan or Iraq. And Israel does a pretty good job of bringing these people to justice.
    These are not the videos that are discussed here. As I'm sure you all know, there is an ongoing wave of "terror" in Israel in the past month (Call it any way you want - the facts are that civilians, kids, women and the elderly are daily being stabbed in the street and purposely being run-over in bus stops). Many of the Arab attackers are kids. Boys and girls aged 11 and up, leave school, pick up a kitchen knife and go hunting for Jews to kill.
    These kids are sometimes called to action using illegal (per the Youtube and Facebook terms of service) videos in the Arabic language. These are the videos in question. They are copying the ISIS video recruitment strategy and it is working out pretty good for them. There are ~2 attacks per day. Many of the attackers are Arab Israelis with full civilian rights and a Israeli passport.
    Imagine sending your kids to school in this climate.

  41. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by citizenr · · Score: 1

    What if you targeted specific vocal cord patterns?

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  42. Tell them to buzz off. by samantha · · Score: 2

    Israel doesn't get a say in what a US company does. Neither does any other country.

    1. Re:Tell them to buzz off. by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Google has business units in Israel (namely Waze, among others) and makes money selling search ads there.

      No doubt there would be investigations and sanctions on these businesses if Google failed to cooperate with these requests regarding video content. Heck Google could find itself kicked out of the country entirely and lose billions as their shares take hits.

      "Do what we want or get shut down" happens a lot in business outside the US, and even within the US to some extent. Pressure like this would be illegal and unconstitutional in the US but condoned and perhaps desired elsewhere.

      --
      Sig for hire.
  43. Empathy Helps by ARos · · Score: 1

    It's simple to see Israel's point of view on the issue of youtube video censorship, if you adhere to the Golden Rule. If people were broadcasting recruitment videos, inciting hate and violence against your friends and family (and yourself), and these videos were demonstrably proven to have convinced young people to stab random people on the street, you would try to combat it as aggressively as you could. Free as in freedom applies to protocol, not method. In the absence of better options, and since the state depts. of many countries already censor ISIS and al Queda propaganda videos, I support the censorship of videos inciting violence against Israeli citizens. Hopefully the violence will end one day, so there will be no such videos to censor.

  44. Deputising for AmiMoJo by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If some guy from Japan wants to live there and eat palak paneer while wearing a sombrero and listening to Beethoven

    Cultural appropriation! I'm triggered, I need some pearls to clutch!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  45. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DICE should be ashamed to publicize such trashy liberal propaganda !!

    The Palestinian government is run by Hamas & Fatah - DICE has nothing to do with it.

    The propaganda problem is with Israel: trying to keep the rest of the world ignorant about their oppression of Palestinians.

  46. Re:As an Israeli, I would LIKE Youtube to keep the by kubajz · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the post, I'm sorry I cannot mod you up. It really is such a gross oversimplification to say that "both sides are the same" in this conflict. A truly balanced view :(

  47. Re:Here are a couple of more objective news accoun by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Actually, YouTube removed videos which were encouraging Palestinians to kill Israelis (and were actually faked),

    And now they're meeting to talk about removing a whole bunch more content. What do you want to bet that they will only be removing things that should legitimately be removed?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Much bullshit here.

    There is so much semite in modern jews, even in those long of european descent, it's easily identified with cheap DNA sequencing, as any customer of FTDNA, Ancestry or 23andme can see and test for themselves. As for the Cohen and Levi bloodlines they are alive and well and easily verified by Y-DNA identification of haplogroups such as J-P58* or J-M410* (source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm... ). Same goes for a lot of mitochondrial DNA haplogroups of course. And the results are applicable directly to Palestinians as well, since Palestinian Arabs and Jews are genetically indistinguishable and form a single population.

    But then I suspect you already know you're full of shit and are just trolling.

  49. Truth Hurts by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    If the films are real then whether inflammatory or not they should be open for the world to see. Perhaps Israel should reign in their soldiers who do wrong and show the world the effects of segregating Palestinians

  50. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A couple of points. First, the UN does not have the legal authority to renounce Israel's sovereignty. Second, the only way to impose peace on Palestine/Israel would be to convince both sides that they are willing to accept anything to end the conflict. At this moment, the Israelis have indicated a willingness to accept anything short of losing sovereignty over the bulk of the territory which they are currently considered to be sovereign in order to attain peace.(whether or not they are truly willing to do so is unknown because of the other side). On the other hand, the Arabs have indicated that they are only willing to accept peace on the basis of the dissolution of Israel (with some indications that this would involve the death or expulsion of all Jews, although whether that is genuine or just a posture by some is open to debate. If I was an Israeli, I would be inclined to believe that it was genuine.).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  51. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by andydread · · Score: 1

    But then you link to filthy conservative propaganda sites to make your point - smh.

  52. Today Israel commemorates 850,000 Jews attacked by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Today Israel commemorates 850,000 Jews attacked & expelled from Arab lands & Iran, where Jews lived for millennia.

  53. Re:Racist regime wants censorship - anyone surpris by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    > This is a regime that ethnically cleansed a whole people from their country, stole their land,

    Except both of those statements are outright lies.

  54. Re:LOL at 'inciting'. by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    > Can't have the Palestinians fighting back against the Jews who have stolen their land

    Total BS, never happened.

  55. I thought Hitler was dead? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Seems to be alive and posting on Slashdot.

    1. Re:I thought Hitler was dead? by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      "...Hitler... Seems to be alive and posting on Slashdot."

      False alert! No Hitlers or neo-Nazis here.

      Just decent humans - and a few Arab-hating Zionist trolls desperately trying to deny their crimes and spin their lies.

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  56. Re:Here are a couple of more objective news accoun by nbauman · · Score: 1

    And now they're meeting to talk about removing a whole bunch more content. What do you want to bet that they will only be removing things that should legitimately be removed?

    I don't know. There are two conflicting forces here.

    One force is driven by the principle that, even for their own selfish, commercial purposes, Youtube can't be overwhelmingly popular and successful if they arbitrarily censor content.

    The other force is that the Israeli government has one of the most powerful, well-funded, influential lobbies in the U.S., as effective as the National Rifle Association. They've gotten congressmen voted out of office by sheer financial contributions to their opponents.

    (And I think it's disturbing that a foreign country, through campaign contributions by its American proxies, can influence American elections like that.)

    I don't know which principle is going to win. We'll see pretty soon.

  57. Waste of time by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    What they want to do is a complete waste of time as neither Google nor YouTube control the whole internet, and in fact all it would do is push more of the videos to sites like Liveleak which isn't controlled by Google anyway. They only went to Google as an implied threat about what would happen to Google's Israeli interests and business if they DIDN'T cooperate.

    And then what do you do, ask Liveleak to stop? Do you think a site fine posting videos of car accidents, decapitations, people burning to death, and much much more is going to care what Israel might ask for? No.

    The site is already overrun with various videos from Syria and Iraq and all manner of other places. If you've EVER had any desire to hear how many times somebody can yell "Allahu Ackbar!" while shooting at or being bombed by other forces, Liveleak is your place. And then you can watch the daily video of the scooter crash in China where everybody died horribly. There is one of those about every day so it doesn't have to be any specific scooter crash video. Just wait. There will be a new one.

    LiveLeak is certainly tame compared to Ogrish, but it is WAY beyond what Youtube would ever allow.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  58. Typos by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    I didn't know it was possible to correct typos on /. Given the number of typos I make, that would be a useful feature.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Typos by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You can do it if you are an editor, and the typo is in the article.

  59. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    I have no respect for anyone who would look their brother in the eye and see an animal when what they really see is a mirror.

    This stopped me in my tracks. The highlight of a profound post with many highlights to choose from. Bravo!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  60. Go look somewhere else [Re: Violence!] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't you list the fucking real atrocities that are going in Syria, or in Africa, or in 100 other places where there is conflict in the world.

    When the first response to an accusation is "why aren't you looking at some different crime some different place," I read this as an acknowledgement that the accusation is accurate.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  61. Re: If someone killed my wife and children... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Ok, maybe, but still, you're talking about two groups of people who are very closely related genetically. It's impossible for them not to be: they originate from the same part of the world. They even look mostly the same. It's like comparing a German to a Frenchman. They're not very far apart. It's not like the genetic difference between a German and a Japanese person, or even more, the difference between a subsaharan African and just about anyone else. Humans as a species are extremely inbred, especially the non-African ones. We might think we look really different from ethnic group to ethnic group, but we really aren't.

  62. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Why would someone kill your wife and children?

    Holy land troll.

    Each side uses the other's latest atrocity as justification for it's own and next atrocity.

    When in fact, it is just a dysfunctional family - genetically as well as mental outlook - that in some perverse way, enjoys their eternal fight. This bitchfight will never end, because they don't want it to end.

    And to think that we have allowed ourselves to get drawn into the family feud by people who have a different motive - greasing the skids for their own fairy tale armageddon.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  63. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 1

    What if you targeted specific vocal cord patterns?

    You mean shibboleth?

    Then said they unto him, Say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand.

  64. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Full Disclosure: I'm an Israeli Jew, living in Tel Aviv.

    So, you believe the issue here is about choosing a side? To a certain extent that might be true. But let's be fair, until the UN renounces Israel's sovereignty, takes over, disarms the entire region and enforces peace.. preferably peacefully while treating all the people fairly and with respect, there will be no right side. I don't give a shit if you favor Israelis or Palestinians. They're both a disgrace and behave like something out of a grapes of wrath type experiment.

    As said above, the UN does not have the authority to do that, the US would veto anything of the sort, and I suspect that UN nations (rightly) refuse to send troops to fight the IDF. The Jewish people suffered a holocaust once, they won't do it again.

    The issue here is whether or not a nation like Israel should be allowed to censor "their enemy" on YouTube and other sites. I have no love for anyone who preaches hate like the Palestinians and Israelis do. I have no respect for anyone who would look their brother in the eye and see an animal when what they really see is a mirror. But, for a moment, imagine Israel being able to claim the videos you site as instigating violence... they do... only a fool would disagree with you on this. There are many videos like this and if I believed I had the right to have them taken down, I would.

    Lots of comments say this, but I couldn't find anything that says Google were talking about giving Israel censorship powers. All TFA hints at is a way for the Israeli government to flag videos they think constitute incitement - and Google still has the final word. Think about it - Google refuses to be dictated to by the US government (DHS, NSA), who frankly has the power to put their CEOs in jail and/or fine the company (for failure to comply with national security or some other crap). Do you think Google would agree to be dictated to by the Israeli government who can't do jack shit to them? To the contrary, Google employs hundreds or thousands of employees in their offices in Tel Aviv and Haifa, high-paying jobs which will be lost if Google decides Israel is hostile to them.

    But, what about the video of a crying child who lost his mother or father or sister to bombings and raids led by the Israelis... when that child cries out in fear and terror and agony that the Israelis did this to him. That he hates the people who took someone he loves from him. Would you also agree that this video would insight violence? Would you not agree that only a heartless man would not want to cry for this child? Would you not agree that a fighter would see this as his duty to avenge? Would you agree that this video should be taken down too? I personally wouldn't. A video like this should be seen.

    There are situations like these on both sides. What do you say to the kid whose parents got shot by Israeli soldiers? Well, maybe the same thing you say to the kid whose parents got blown up in a café in Tel Aviv fifteen years ago. Yes, that video should be seen. There is no cause to deny a man to speak out his pain. But I don't think that's what we're talking about here, and I don't think Google _would_ take that down.

    As to the fighter who would see this as his duty to avenge... this is where I take issue. What's the question you really want to ask? Is it "how best should the Palestinian kid get his revenge"? Or is it "what's the best way to honor the deaths of his parents by striving for an end to the killing and the betterment of the Palestinian kid's life"? Because I think it's a vicious cycle, and the way to end it is to make peace.

    Besides, is stabbing random Israelis (and, an example from last week - a 70-year-old Palestinian mistaken for a Jew) - truly revenge?

    At which point between these extremes do we decide which video is appropriate and which insights violence and which insights violence and should be seen... and which ones shouldn't.

    Th

  65. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    The issue here is whether or not a nation like Israel should be allowed to censor "their enemy" on YouTube and other sites.

    Allowed by who? They are a sovereign nation. And as a sovereign nation, they can give Google an alternative: either comply with our censorship or stop doing business in Israel. And Google's options are to negotiate a compromise, comply, or leave.

    Instead fight to have them both dissolved and if the US and UN are going to pay for "peace keeping" in the region, then treat it like post-was Germany and just take the damn thing over and treat it as a haven instead and bring peace there.

    Why the hell should the US pay for peace keeping in the region? Israel and the mess in the Middle East are the result of screwed up European politics and history.

  66. Just make Palestine an independent state already? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Why can't we just make Palestine an independent state and be done with it. While you have a group of people who feel like they are living in apartheid, feeling that another group of people doesn't care about their rights or 'assigned' territories how are things going to improve.

    I know the mess down there is a complicated one, but it really feels like there should be Israel, Palestine and the 'Multi-faith Holy City of Jerusalem'?

    When it comes to religion, I don't really care either way, but most belief systems do indicate some level of 'treating your neighbour with respect', which I don't see much of at the political level in that area. Will it ever happen? I just see a lot of frustrated people, not trusting what moves the other ruling entity will do next.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  67. As a palestinian now living elsewhere by zakeria · · Score: 1

    Most of the videos uploaded by palestinians claiming violence against them by the Israelis are false or fake videos.. that is all

    1. Re:As a palestinian now living elsewhere by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Very good point.

      In fact, I have seen one such video that is proved to be false.

      A Palestinian is taken away in stretcher, then jumps up to lay down and be taken away again.

  68. Everyone should check the excellent Israeli... by spads · · Score: 1

    ...made documentary "Defamation". It makes the critical point that however many Israelis might perceive otherwise, anti-Zionism is not equivalent to anti-Semitism. Thus, the simple logical fallacy that many Zionists fall prey to is, while all (ethnic) Zionists might be Semites, not all Semites are Zionists.

    --
    Bukowski said it. I believe it. That settles it.
    1. Re:Everyone should check the excellent Israeli... by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      "Defamation"

      Excellent Documentary. Thanks for sharing!

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  69. Man sentenced to death in Saudia Arabia for by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    November 30, 2015: "Man sentenced to death in Saudia Arabia for “insulting Quran and spreading atheism”

    http://www.stlucianewsonline.com/international-man-sentenced-to-death-in-saudia-arabia-for-insulting-quran-and-spreading-atheism/

    This is a normal, everyday occurrence in the Muslim world. How often does this happen in Israel?

    Just something for the Israel bashers to think about.

  70. Re:Just make Palestine an independent state alread by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Palestinians have been offered statehood several times, they always turn it down. BTW: there never was a nation of Palestine, and it never concerned "Palestinians" before.

    This conflict is not about land, or statehood, or anything like that. It is about Muslims hating Jews.

    Muslims are deeply offended by the idea of Jews having a country where they can live in peace.

    Israel has demonstrated that they are perfectly willing to live, in peace, with Arabs, or anybody. Israel gives Palestinians full citizenship rights. Palestinians can vote, own land, serve in the military, or hold public office. Other Muslim nations, like Saudi, would never give Palestinians such rights.

    By contrast, Hamas has it written into their charter that they consider it their duty to kill every Jew on earth.

  71. What makes you think this is "truth?" by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    This information comes from a Muslim propaganda cite. The source is "Various (unspecified, unverifiable) Sources"

    For all we know, the entire thing is just Muslim propaganda.

  72. Maybe a Jewish home land is a bad idea? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Muslims hate Jews too much to ever let a Jewish homeland peacefully exist.

    There are 1.6 billion Muslim opposing about 2 million Jews. Muslims have made no secret of their deep hatred of Jews. Muslims have made no secret of their religion commanding Muslims to kill Jews at any cost.

    These days, maybe Jews would be safer if they were mixed in to the population of a secular western nation. That way there would be no centralized target.

  73. Conspiracy Theories by BinBoy · · Score: 1

    > Israel Meets With Google and YouTube To Discuss Censoring Videos

    Too much of the modern world sounds like a wacky conspiracy theory.

  74. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by careysub · · Score: 1

    Mod this guy up please. Too bad he posted as an AC.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  75. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by careysub · · Score: 1

    ... And of course in return Sadat was murdered by his own people....

    Just goes to show how completely different Arabs and Israelis are. No Jewish Israeli would ever dream of murdering their national leader for trying to make peace. Oh wait.....

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  76. Re:Just make Palestine an independent state alread by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    I had never heard that the Palestinians had rejected statehood, since current actions suggest the opposite. A quick search turned up this link:

    http://classroom.synonym.com/d...

    This suggests that they rejected the notion of a country because they didn't agree with the borders, but as you indicated the issue is a bit more complicated than that, given the local geopolitics, both internal and external.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  77. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by Cederic · · Score: 1

    At this moment, the Israelis have indicated a willingness to accept anything short of losing sovereignty over the bulk of the territory which they are currently considered to be sovereign in order to attain peace.

    Israeli settlements in occupied territory prove your lies. Those settlements continue to be an ongoing and direct provocation.

    If the Israelis remove their settlements from the West Bank and return that land to the Palestinians they'd have significantly more credibility when bleating on about peace.

  78. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by easyTree · · Score: 1

    If by wise you mean "send the black helicopters now!" ... although, I feel you.

  79. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by easyTree · · Score: 1

    vocal schmocal.

  80. Re: TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    I think it makes more sense if you assume he is also upset about that

  81. Re:If someone killed my wife and children... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Ok, then to be fair, you need to go back throughout time (let's cut it off at the last 10k years) and find everyone that, when asked casually, agrees with genociding some group of people, and go back in time and kill them when they're a baby.

    Fast-forward back to the present after you're all done with that, and humans will be extinct. You probably wouldn't even need to go back 10k years; just go back 2k years, to a single point in time, and ask everyone then. I doubt you'll find many people alive then who don't want to commit genocide against someone.

  82. Oh it's comparable. Things actually got easier. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Actually, it would be FAR easier to run a propaganda campaign while drowning the opposing side's comments in silence, today.
    Internet is FAR more fragile than radio and far easier to control or simply to cut off.
    Meanwhile, people age at the same rate and bullets only got better and airstrikes got cheaper.

    Only thing that is lacking is an actual willingness to go full hog with the extermination of the opposition.
    Spain was a fascist dictatorship back then.
    And nobody wants to go full jackboots goose-stepping mustache twirling evil any more.
    Even terrorists are selling the story that they are actually fighting on the side of the angels.
    Everyone wants to be the liberator, the freedom fighter, the righteous crusader... or at least a grieving victim, wronged and abused.

    And silencing the other side's propaganda is sure a good place to start if you want to make your version of the story the official truth.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Oh it's comparable. Things actually got easier. by Sun · · Score: 1

      And silencing the other side's propaganda is sure a good place to start if you want to make your version of the story the official truth.

      You just described BDS.

      Shachar

  83. Re:TFA is a filthy liberal propaganda ! by cavreader · · Score: 1

    I was not making any comparisons to the assassinated Israeli leader who was also killed by a countryman for making the peace treaty. The point I was making was that there have been no Arab leaders since Sadat who are willing to actually sit down directly with the Israelis and apply some common sense and pragmatism to the conflict. Jordan also signed a treaty with Israel but their main motivation was they saw no way the could every defeat Israel by military force and made a pragmatic decision to make peace. A strong Arab leader who is willing to cast aside all the harsh rhetoric, openly admit that all the previous wars and related actions were a mistake, and does not have a problem sitting at the same table, face to face, with the Israeli leadership could hammer out a solution. An Arab leader displaying these characteristics would force the Israeli's to respond in kind.

  84. Pressure on the BBC today for example by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It was the equivalent of saying if I have any examples of water being wet please tell you elsewhere - and you know it - deliberate belittling insult pretending reality is not real just to push your agenda. A newspaper will give you plenty of examples where the current Israeli government has used propaganda and has applied pressure to media outlets to force their view. For example today it's the BBC being given a hard time for perceived bais.
    You denial of something so blatant, obvious and ongoing for years of course inspired deep disgust as does your efforts to mislead people here. This is not a political site so such disgusting games are especially annoying.

    1. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by Sun · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'm still waiting to hear where I called you a liar. It's a serious accusation which you have repeated several times, and which I believe to be wrong, so I believe some actual evidence is in order.

      It was the equivalent of saying if I have any examples of water being wet please tell you elsewhere - and you know it - deliberate belittling insult pretending reality is not real just to push your agenda.

      No, it isn't. Here's the evidence that water is wet. It is easy to produce, because it is both true and actually self evident, unlike your statements.

      Your point, however, is a contested one. As such, you shouldn't act hurt or surprised that someone asks you to substantiate it. In essence, you are accusing me of lying, of claiming something different than what I believe in. I reject that accusation. I truly believe that criticism against Israel is not self evident and needs substantiation.

      When you are stating that this is self evident and requires no proof, what you are doing is not to show it is true. What you are doing is to show that you are holding it as prejudice. An opinion based on belief rather than facts.

      As for the BBC accusation, please do post a link if you want to discuss it. Your abstract makes no sense. You are presenting accusation of misrepresentation as proof that these accusations are wrong. Again, this might align with your prejudice, but is not proof of anything. The BBC could be unfairly misrepresenting the truth, in which case Israel would have a valid cause to complain.

      Shachar

    2. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The denial of the ubiquitous examples - as you very well know.
      There's not much point reading the rest of your post since you stated that way. What is it with you political freaks - now one as an apologist to genocidal fascists FFS. The Jewish people of the 1940s would look in horror at the people running Israel today.

    3. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Here is another since it appears you wish to pretend you live under a rock:
      http://www.jewishnews.net.au/a...

      Go on then - accuse jewishnews of being anti-semetic.

    4. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by Sun · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read the link you sent?

      First of all, it is not Israel doing the grilling in this case. You brought as proof an instance unrelated to the point you're trying to prove.

      Also, just because a media outlet gets grilled does not automatically mean it is unjustified. Unless you're claiming that the following constitutes an acceptable level of reporting:

      “When the ABC tells the Australian viewing public ‘just hours ago, Israeli security forces shot two more Palestinians after they tried to board a school bus south of Jerusalem’, we are entitled to be repulsed. What could be more innocent than boarding a school bus? What an outrageous overreaction by the Israeli security forces,” Abetz said.

      “In this instance, what the ABC failed to tell us is that this seemingly innocent act and ugly overreaction was in fact a situation where two Hamas operatives/terrorists tried to board the bus and had stabbed a man.

      “Similarly, the report of the killing of a ‘friendly, gifted student’ that tried to stab security forces ‘so they shot her dead’. The female student was shot dead by the female security officer she actually stabbed.”

      Shachar

    5. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Of course I read it. It's an example of the pressure as applied by Abetz who is for sale.

    6. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by Sun · · Score: 1

      Fine. Let's assume, for the sake of discussion, that it is Israel pressuring.

      Can you call it unjustified in this particular instance? Would you call the example of reporting of acceptable quality?

      Shachar

    7. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by dbIII · · Score: 1

      OK you are pretending not to understand again. If anyone else gets this far down the thread who is not pretending to be stupid the story is the ABC is well known for being impartial yet they are being accused of bias in this case because the reporter some years ago said that she admired the war correspondent Mr Fisk of the Guardian. How petty can a claim of bias get? This very tenous and petty claim of bias is AN EXAMPLE OF THE PROPAGANDA is it not? And that's just today.

    8. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by Sun · · Score: 1

      The two examples I quoted were from reports from the last couple of months.

      Why don't we just agree that one of us is pretending not to understand. This way we both get to claim moral victory, and the readers are free to make up their own minds?

      Shachar

    9. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You wish me to give you a free pass for denial of an obvious ongoing effort to influence and suppress media reports critical of a the actions the political party currently running Israel?
      Yes or no?

    10. Re:Pressure on the BBC today for example by Sun · · Score: 1

      You wish me to give you a free pass for denial of an obvious ongoing effort to influence and suppress media reports critical of a the actions the political party currently running Israel?
      Yes or no?

      From your perspective: Yes.

      It's called "Freedom of speech". You allow others with opinions you do not agree with, maybe even that makes you angry and offend you, to speak out their minds. What you get in return is a pass from me to hold opinions completely unsubstantiated by facts under the guise of "self evident" (essentially the appeal to authority fallacy, except without specifying any authority).

      And the real beauty of it is that I don't actually need your "free pass". Watch this place for my complete lack of any more comments on this thread, whether your pass is given or not.

      Have a great, blissful, life.
      Shachar

  85. Have done with Israel. by bitterblackale · · Score: 1

    If you have to have an official "Military Censor" because videos of your own soldiers' domestic actions are "inflammatory," you're well on your way to creating a military dictatorship.

  86. Re:Just make Palestine an independent state alread by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

    "..there never was a nation of Palestine... It is about Muslims hating Jews... Muslims are deeply offended by the idea of Jews having a country where they can live in peace..."

    What a bunch of Zionist horseshit!

    Stop murdering Palestinians, quit stealing their land and quit lying about it all.

    That is all the world is asking. Peace will naturally follow.

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  87. Re:LOL at 'inciting'. by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

    Denying the existence of Palestinians, their country, their oppression and murder is nearly as bad as the crimes that Israel has committed itself.

    You should be very ashamed of yourself. Please go bury your head in the sand.

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  88. Boycott Israel! by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

    Boycotting Israel is something that every individual can do and collectively we can all make a difference.

    How many more innocent women and children need to be murdered? How many more deceitful lies must we hear from these bigoted, Zionist supremacists?

    These people are an insult to the real, decent Jewish people and to the rest of the world. Enough already.

    Support boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel until she frees Palestine and atones for her war crimes, terrorism and ethnic cleansing.

    Free Palestine!

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    1. Re:Boycott Israel! by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Before boycotting, you need to formulate a realistic plan that would cause boycott to end. Currently, if Palestinians control a certain territory it is used to continuously launch rockets on Israel. If they are allowed to share land, they blow themselves up in public places. What exactly would you have Israel do? Where is a Palestinian government that is strong enough to stop violence if a particular deal is put into place?

  89. Good to Hear! by Doctrinsograce · · Score: 1

    I am Jewish and the antisemitism that I see on the Internet goes way beyond reason. Sheesh. We are no more than 22M people. Do other minorities experience this kind of stuff? Not that I can see.

  90. hegemony by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Jews are 18 million;
    Muslims are 1800 million;
    Isn't Israel jeopardising future generations of Jews?
    Any type of hegemony will have awkward repercussions and collateral damage; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  91. This thread is about a limit to freedom FFS by dbIII · · Score: 1

    This thread is about a limit to freedom of speech FFS.
    What is it with you people? You stood up for blocking speech with your first post and now you are saying that I'm attempting to limit your speech? Is that a good thing or is it not? You are having it both ways at your convenience.