Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Upgrade Activates By Clicking Red X Close Button In Prompt Message (bbc.co.uk)

Reader Raging Bool writes: In a move guaranteed to annoy many people, Microsoft has "jumped the shark" on encouraging users to upgrade to Windows 10. Microsoft has faced criticism for changing the pop-up box encouraging Windows users to upgrade to Windows 10. Clicking the red cross on the right hand corner of the pop-up box now activates the upgrade instead of closing the box. And this has caused confusion as typically clicking a red cross closes a pop-up notification. The upgrade could still be cancelled, when the scheduled time for it to begin appeared, Microsoft said The change occurred because the update is now labelled "recommended" and many people have their PCs configured to accept recommended updates for security reasons. This means dismissing the box does not dismiss the update.Brad Chacos, senior editor at the PC World wrote about this incident over the weekend, and described it as a "nasty trick".

349 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. This steaming pile of rancid dung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's it, I'm getting my Commodore 64 out of the closet and booting up GEOS.

    1. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As soon as you boot up your Commodore 64, it'll ask you if you want to upgrade to Windows 10. Even if you say you don't, it'll force you to Windows 10 anyways.

    2. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dammit, they were playing the longest of long cons with their Microsoft BASIC.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, if you're a horror fan, you won't find any game on the C64 that's scarier than doing the custom Windows 10 installation and seeing all the default settings for data collection and "privacy."

      Seriously, there is some REALLY crazy shit in there. If you go default, you're basically giving MS the right to watch and collect EVERYTHING you do online. IIRC, one of the default settings even lets them go through your old emails to "better serve you" or some shit. That Cortana is one nosy bitch.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by gerf · · Score: 2

      Next week I plan to release a free crapware game, spamming CDs to the masses ala AOL. In the prompts in the auto-installer, the text will say that in order to cancel, press ctrl-alt-shift-t while clicking cancel, with any other key combination or selection automatically upgrading the computer to BeOS.

    5. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is fucking bullshit man. I didn't know about that.

      Back when Billy boy Gates was head honcho I used to send him ALL my online activity in extremely distorted 240 res .viv files (that you could open in x4 zoom for even more distortion)

      He always rejected my submissions, despite the hours of wanking I bothered converting from VHS to digital just for him.

      Now, a couple of decades later they want everyone else's data. Makes no bloody sense.

      #justbeacuse

    6. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, I pulled out atari 800 this weekend (it hasn't been touched since 1987) and it was fun. The reason I got into computers in the first place. I spent Sunday on ebay looking for additions, upgrades and games now that I can afford them.

    7. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just do what all the smart people do: Use a pirated copy of Windows 7. My stolen shit has not tried to upgrade me to anything even once, and it has been lovely.

    8. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      I loved my Atari 800. I had a 400 before getting it. Star Raiders was my favorite game back then. I also had an Atari 520 ST and all three computers still work!

      Way back then I designed a mileage report form (using Pagestream) for my boss, and today we're still using it, printed of course. You know you've been with a company for a long time when you helped design the forms they use.

    9. Re: This steaming pile of rancid dung by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Sweet! I bought one of those this weekend too, I never had one. I bought my computer to play games, but didn't have any money left over, so had to write all my games myself. I found that I liked writing games better than playing them.

    10. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Microsoft and "scroogled", if you can't beat em, join em

    11. Re:This steaming pile of rancid dung by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      As soon as you boot up your Commodore 64, it'll ask you if you want to upgrade to Windows 10. Even if you say you don't, it'll force you to Windows 10 anyways.

      I know you are joking, but your comment suggests that moving backwards is the only choice. There are much better options than Microsoft available to you and anyone still stuck with their crappy service. They have a history of dirty tricks like this since the only DOS days. It's time to forget about them and move to something that does not embrace anti-competitive trade practices.

      If you just stop using Microsoft, it will go away.

  2. Windows 10 by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our Steaming Pile of Dung Overlords.

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
    1. Re:Windows 10 by dc29A · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Even Windows fanboi Thurrott is fed up ...

      https://www.thurrott.com/windo...

    2. Re:Windows 10 by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even Windows fanboi Thurrott is fed up ...

      It's people like him that have caused this. Their uncritical fandom of Microsoft has encouraged Microsoft to abuse its customers ever more, resulting in the (almost) forced upgrades (downgrades?) to Windows 10.

      Paul: don't start complaining now. You should have been complaining over the last 10 years.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Windows 10 by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I agree, the whole Windows obsessed IT magazine market have never said anything even remotely bad about Windows or Microsoft except for the occasional nit place far down in the column (after the 99 reasons to upgrade now). They barely acknowledge the existence of competitors, and have served as apologists for Microsoft constantly (after all you have to upgrade someday or you'll go to jail, so they're helping you!). Of course, they'll all paid from Redmond.

      It's like the 70s again, where "no one got fired for buying IBM", only with more religious fervor.

    4. Re:Windows 10 by PRMan · · Score: 1

      While Paul T. does do some criticism, he even liked Vista and 8, so he's very biased in favor of Microsoft.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:Windows 10 by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I have 8.1. There are some dumb bits. But if you ignore Metro and the app store and lack of start menu, it's not bad on the desktop. I prefer it to Windows 7 in several ways, and it doesn't have all the telemetry, requirements to have Cortana & Edge, forced updates, and other W10 idiocies. Microsoft apologized, a rare event, for Windows 8 in regards to the UI and removal of start button which are basically cosmetic goofs, improves in 8.1, but then turns around and doubles down on stupid ideas in W10...

      It's a somewhat recent Microsoft pattern as they've stopped being the only 500 lb gorilla in the room. They see other companies making money and then try to catch up very late to the game, without knowing anything about the field they're determinted to dominate, and ending up failing and being laughed at. The Zune to catch up with the iPod music player boom; Bing to catch up with Google; Windows Phone to catch up with iPhone and Android; the Win CE devices to catch up with Palm; the whole Media Edition fiasco; etc. (They did succeed with Xbox I think, which was either a fluke or else the corporate office wasn't interfering.) So now they're again trying to do catch up with being yet another ad revenue based company, a phone-like applet based company, and yet another misguided attempt to make tablets no one wants. They have not been a leader in technology for a very long time.

  3. So it's our fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For following years of best practice of automatically installing updates on home machines.
    Got it.

    1. Re:So it's our fault by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      > So it's our fault // For following years of best practice

      No, but it arguably is everyone's fault for trusting Microsoft at all.
      Computer administration is an actual job, and OS manufactures and distributors have jumped through hoops to make this vastly better than "please visit our website and download and apply these patches at a command line". But in doing this, you end up trusting both the intentions and the technical competence of those involved. For a mainline Linux distro or a BSD, this is a solid bet. For a less famous Linux distro, the technical competence can be in question- you may end up with a broken patch here or there, or some vulnerability that affects you temporarily. These usually get worked out super fast.

      Much more concerning is trusting the INTENTIONS- trusting Apple's intentions has been a safe bet, but there's no guarantees, and if you want to distrust them as many in the free software community do, go ahead. But Microsoft signaled that they were untrustworthy in ever increasing amounts over the years- from strange constant names in leaked code to an unhealthy interest in allowing your BIOS to lock out all Microsoft competitors, to progressively tricky cloud-based tech, to the current state of Windows 10 telemetry being essentially impossible to disable (don't argue with me, check your wireshark!)... and that's just the more recent stuff. Microsoft was busy being odd in the 90s, and now they are being SUPER spooky.

      Basically, letting Microsoft push software to your box has ALWAYS been trusting Nedry with your dinosaurs. It just hasn't been overtly hostile until now, but there's been plenty of clues.

    2. Re:So it's our fault by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      No, but it arguably is everyone's fault for trusting Microsoft at all.

      If you use a closed source operating system, trusting the vendor is a necessity. Because no one else can fully check what is going on in the code. With something like Linux it is still difficult, but you have a greater chance that someone will discover shenanigans. If only by accident while browsing the code. So a malicious Linux vendor still has discovery to fear.

      Now I agree that Microsoft have displayed untrustworthiness in ever increasing amounts over the years. I think the minimum precautions for a private user are not to use Windows for highly critical stuff. So far, my personal consequence is that I never, ever use Microsoft products for online banking. I'm also refusing to upgrade my main PC to Windows 10, and planning to jump ship entirely in 2020 when Win 7 support runs out. That might cost me a few games that won't run in WINE, but sometimes you have to make a sacrifice.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    3. Re:So it's our fault by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is digging a hole for itself.

      Getting people to upgrade from Windows XP was done on the grounds that updates are good, but will no longer be provided for XP.

      However, if Microsoft makes people disable automatic updates for Windows 7 and 8 now, who is going to notice when these versions become no longer supported and updated? "It's 2020 and Windows 7 will no longer have updates? Oh, I have disabled them 4 years ago, so I don't care"

    4. Re:So it's our fault by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      "It's 2020 and Windows 7 will no longer have updates? Oh, I have disabled them 4 years ago, so I don't care"

      Fortunately for me, the MS Updates system on the only Windows machine that I still own (W7) borked itself well before the release of Windows 10, so I've apparently been rendered immune to forced Windows 10 upgrades by Microsoft's own code. It's just one more way in which Windows 7 is more efficient! :-)

    5. Re:So it's our fault by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could get started with a dual-boot partition now. When 10 happened, it was the final straw. I couldn't believe the bizarre technical workarounds everyone started doing. I knew I couldn't even leave Windows 7 updates on, and I could certainly never use 10. Since a machine without updates is a problem waiting to happen, I installed Linux onto a second drive, and tried to spend as much time there as possible. Obviously, this meant I was still booting Windows for many things, but every week I would make time to get a new thing working in Linux. Usually, it was easy- the nvidia drivers were painless, Steam client could then install and run any of a ton of Linux games, LibreOffice was a lot better than I remember. Sometimes it was a bit of a pain- MAME needed a code modification and compile to not have a nag screen (windows would have this problem too, but often people post nagless binaries for Windows, if you like to run random binaries straight off the net), WINE needed some configuration, etc.

      But eventually I noticed that my reasons to boot Windows were finally very slim. Every game I cared about I could get running in WINE (but obviously not every game, and you could easily find that your games you care about don't work). Productivity stuff seems to work great for my needs, at least. Not everything works- currently I can't get itunes to work, and there's that tax software that I'll need again next year. I might run a VM, I don't know yet.

      If you plan to stay with Windows 7 until 2020, you don't need to act now. But you might still consider it. Vulkan should eventually really help games on Linux, and you might find that your games are already well supported.

      Windows 7 got the telemetry patched in last spring, and then they turned it on in the summer. You can wusa uninstall those updates, or you can just go without updates at all. But that deliberate mislabelling and stealthing in of the technology made me flip my shit. How does the saying go? "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me... you can't get fooled again!"

      I just think running an OS from a known-hostile entity is bad news, if you can avoid it.

    6. Re: So it's our fault by infolation · · Score: 2

      I disabled updates around service pack 1. No issues

      The botnet software you're unaware of on your machine is reporting 'no issues' too.

    7. Re:So it's our fault by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      So far, the bizarre technical workarounds work for me, it is just the nagging worry what stunt Microsoft will pull next.

      And I already have the dual-boot setup. Games are my main reason to keep using Windows (for now), almost everything else is Open Source software that is available under Linux as well.

      Office => LibreOffice
      Browser => Firefox
      Music player => plenty of options in Linux

      So thanks for the advice, but I'm pretty much prepared for taking the plunge already. I'm just delaying the inevitable because I like my games ;-)

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    8. Re:So it's our fault by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > So far, the bizarre technical workarounds work for me
      Might want to run wireshark just to be sure. I think if you are still 7 and did the wusa uninstall you are probably safe. If you are in 10, man, definitely wireshark that.

      >Games are my main reason to keep using Windows (for now)
      Yea, I hear you. You might try googling the name of the game and "wine", and see if it is easy to run. If you find yourself in Linux, and you have a game to play, that could save you a reboot cycle, you know?

    9. Re:So it's our fault by houghi · · Score: 1

      Concerning the tax program. It apparently depends on your country. e.g. in Belgium it works great via Linux. But that is because it is via a website and authentication is done via your (obligatory) ID with a chip on it and the source for the readers is open source and available compiled in all major distro's.or downloable via http://eid.belgium.be/en

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  4. Red X? by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps you mean the white X inside the red square?

    But, yeah, this is the kind of thing that malware authors use. It's pretty shady.... if people don't want to upgrade, they don't want to upgrade. You gave them the box and you downloaded (and expanded) all of the files... you have already done everything you can to "promote" Windows 10 (intrusively) on people's computers...

    Why are you stooping to this Microsoft?

    You may as well just not give people a "choice" at all and just install the damn thing... why the pretense of having a user click something?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Red X? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Funny

      Go home Nadella, you're drunk.

    2. Re:Red X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just release WIn XP and Win 7 into the public domain and they'll keep being patched as needed.

      Windows 10 is a pathetic pile of spyware piping every keystroke right back to Microsoft and the NSA...

    3. Re:Red X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using an outdated OS is akin to using malware.

      That word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Protip: Windows 7 is supported until at least 2020.

    4. Re:Red X? by iampiti · · Score: 2

      Why? Probably to prevent legal troubles: "But ...people had a way to prevent the update"

    5. Re:Red X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no no no... It's not Windows 10 that sends your keystrokes back...
      It's Cortana ;-) She watches, listens and spies on ya...

      I had fun with one of my users, he was all knowing and happy he got Windows 10... I just walked into his office he asked me why his computer was acting up by itself when he was on the phone.

      I just said: "Hey Cortana, display all contacts"

      There was a huge silence... you could feel it... It was... it was.... ooohhhh so beautiful.

    6. Re:Red X? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      But, yeah, this is the kind of thing that malware authors use. It's pretty shady....

      My theory is after Whipslash's group bought SourceForge, the former owners got hired on by the Windows 10 marketing team.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Red X? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Supported until 2020. Your trolling is weak.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    8. Re:Red X? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I've begun referring to Windows 10 as "Windows NSA edition", or alternatively, a CTD, Computer-Transmitted Disease.. It certainly *acts* like an STD.. Damn glad I gave up using MS products after I retired. Now its 100% Linux...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    9. Re:Red X? by just+another+AC · · Score: 2

      why the pretense of having a user click something?

      Lawyers. They probably feel this is unethical as hell, but can probably get away without being pulled over the coals by various courts/authorities.

    10. Re:Red X? by fermion · · Score: 1

      This is what I was thinking. Anytime you break a usability standard you introduce a new vector for malware. It is like when banks started using interstitial for adverting during log on. User now expect man-in-the-middle attacks.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:Red X? by Place+a+name+here · · Score: 1

      The difference between the Windows 10 installer and actual malware is directly proportional to the number of days left of the free offer.

    12. Re: Red X? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Yep, through the Gibson Research tool.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    13. Re:Red X? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Supported... I don't think you know what THAT word means...

    14. Re:Red X? by number6x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The opposite, I think. The MS lawyers would have tried to stop this. This will absolutely lead to a class action lawsuit, and probably a shareholder lawsuit as well. Even if Microsoft wins the lawsuits, it will cost them tens of Millions, at a minimum.

      I think the lawyers would have tried like hell to stop this, so they must have been over-ruled. However much MS is expecting to make from user data over the next few years must be estimated to be vastly greater than they are expecting to pay out in lawsuits over this upgrade tactic.

      Now this could be good or bad. If the people at MS who estimated how great a market share Windows phones would have, or how much Windows 8 would be loved did the estimation, MS has just destroyed its own future. They would have projected that the money to be made by mining and selling data from Windows 10 users would have made $ trillions, when it will actually be worth a few $ thousand. If actual actuaries and accountants with a realistic view of the world did the estimation and were able to still over-rule the lawyers, MS is going to be selling their windows 10 users down the river to make a ton of money, be prepared to be assaulted by advertising.

    15. Re:Red X? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      It's how voting machines work.

    16. Re:Red X? by ewhac · · Score: 2

      The MS lawyers would have tried to stop this. This will absolutely lead to a class action lawsuit [ ... ]

      Uh, no. Microsoft's lawyers already have this base covered:

      10. Binding Arbitration and Class Action Waiver if You Live in (or if a Business Your Principal Place of Business is in) the United States.

      We hope we never have a dispute, but if we do, you and we agree to try for 60 days to resolve it informally. If we can't, you and we agree to binding individual arbitration before the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), and not to sue in court in front of a judge or jury. Instead, a neutral arbitrator will decide and the arbitrator's decision will be final except for a limited right of appeal under the FAA. Class action lawsuits, class-wide arbitrations, private attorney-general actions, and any other proceeding where someone acts in a representative capacity aren't allowed. Nor is combining individual proceedings without the consent of all parties. "We," "our," and "us" includes Microsoft, the device manufacturer, and software installer. [emphasis in original]

      -- Windows 10 license "agreement"

    17. Re: Red X? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --NOTE: If you're on Slashdot, and you haven't encouraged *all* of your friends and family to install GWX Control Panel (or the GRC tool) on their Win7/Win8 boxes -- you need to step up your game.

      / not targeting parent poster, just sayin'

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    18. Re:Red X? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Only good in the US. In Canada, EU, Japan, and so on you can sue the fuck out of them and right into the ground. You can't be forced to waive legal rights by any form of contract.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    19. Re:Red X? by clarkn0va · · Score: 2

      What about the folks who decline the Windows 10 license agreement, which is of course presented after the upgrade has happened? Regardless of whether the ensuing rollback is successful, I would think you have a class action group right there, bound only by the license agreement of whatever OS they were using when their computer's day got suddenly worse.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    20. Re:Red X? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Your 2 cents aren't worth the zinc they're made from.

  5. Re:Security by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could give you many reasons for why you are wrong, but it's simpler to tell a troll like you to go f*ck yourself.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  6. Adult Supervision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems like all adult supervision has disappeared at Microsoft.

    1. Re: Adult Supervision by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      You talk as if it existed sometime in the past.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  7. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you don't move to Windows 10 then you deserve all the security problems you will inevitably have. GUI and "principle" issues aside - it is a smart move.

    Most people should be forced to switch. If you are too dumb to prevent the switch then you are in the camp of people who should be forced to switch. The tears mean its working.

    You're already fucked in in the ass by a flaming, splintered telephone pole security-wise for running Windows in the first place.

    Windows 10 adds massive phone-home surveillance to an already-insecure OS.

  8. Mimics Malware by Luthair · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Amusing that Microsoft wants us to love their stuff when they employ the same tactics as all the sites trying to confuse users into installing malware use.

    1. Re:Mimics Malware by stradric · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not just this either. Have you upgraded Skype recently? It tries to set your homepage to MSN and make Bing the default search. It's like Java trying to install the Yahoo toolbar. It's almost like Microsoft and Oracle know they're headed toward irrelevance and are trying all the slimy tactics instead of actually just making better products.

    2. Re:Mimics Malware by ripvlan · · Score: 2

      I see your point. But when has malware every cared which button you clicked before installing?

      oh...yeah... I see your point.

    3. Re:Mimics Malware by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Yup, this has definitely been an issue for years too.

    4. Re:Mimics Malware by Maven0 · · Score: 2

      I move to Linux mint because of this. I decided I would prefer to have a to fiddle with my computer more than dealing with windows 10 "features".

      I refused to upgrade from windows 7 to 10 on my new skylake computer. I currently use linux for about 90% of my computing. If windows 10 manages to force its self onto me I will just uninstall.

    5. Re:Mimics Malware by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      Yep. I've always had terrible luck with linux installs breaking in the weirdest ways and requiring several weekends and a reinstall to fix, but dealing with that is preferable to dealing with windows 10.

    6. Re:Mimics Malware by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I hadn't used Linux for years because of installation problems. W10 got me to try Ubuntu, and that particular install went very well. When I replace my Windows laptop, I'm seriously thinking of getting one from System 76 and avoiding Windows entirely.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re: Mimics Malware by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Then that's your choice.

      Microsoft provides one option, with certain costs & limitations.

      Apple provides a different option, with different costs & limitations.

      Pay your money, make your choice.

      Don't like either? Go with linux & its OTHER limitations.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:Mimics Malware by c · · Score: 1

      I thought this was a new Microsoft security initiative to teach users to read closely what's on a dialog, be careful what they click, and make sure they have a backup for when it all goes wrong no matter what they do.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    9. Re:Mimics Malware by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Malware authors don't have PR specialists on staff. Microsoft does. And the PR people probably suggested that at least allow the victims to click a button first so that MS can claim they didn't install anything without permission.

      Just look at the naive excuses Microsoft gives out, even with this latest fiasco.

      "Based on customer feedback, in the most recent version of the Get Windows 10 (GWX) app, we confirm the time of your scheduled upgrade and provide you an additional opportunity for cancelling or rescheduling the upgrade." (it's what customers wanted!)

      "With the free Windows 10 upgrade offer ending on 29 July, we want to help people upgrade to the best version of Windows." (they're being helpful!)

      ""Customers can choose to accept or decline the Windows 10 upgrade." (so it must be the customer's fault)

    10. Re:Mimics Malware by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I would. The only thing keeping me on a PC are games. And that includes a lot of older games in the closet. New Steam stuff won't solve that (and it's yet another company saying "please trust us implicitly", also with mandatory forced upgrades). WINE won't solve all of it either. What I can do is when support expires I can disconnect the computer from the internet and keep it going that way.

    11. Re:Mimics Malware by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Linux really needs to start standardizing and not completely changing how stuff works ever few years. I used to know how to do everything in Linux but now it's too complicated. Even simple actions like adding an icon for the desktop to do a custom command is complicated and undocumented. Worse is you can't google for it, it'll show you ubuntu if you're using xubuntu, or ubuntu 15 if you're using ubuntu 16. VMware insists on breaking every time you update the Linux image (such as time refusing to sync with the host computer). It's a never ending learning curve, great for techies who use it everyday and who's focus is on Linux itself, but annoying as hell if you just wanted to get some work done.

    12. Re: Mimics Malware by tinoesroho · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of orphaned games that do not work on post-longhorn (Vista, 7,8,10). These games can be run in a virtual machine. Most notable? MGS2. Most 2011+ games have Linux ports. 2006-2010 games may require a separate windows networking disabled partition.

    13. Re:Mimics Malware by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      It's a never ending learning curve, great for techies who use it everyday and who's focus is on Linux itself, but annoying as hell if you just wanted to get some work done.

      Nope, I'm a techie who uses Linux professionally and I don't like it either. You're absolutely right about them needing to start standardizing; it's way way overdue. The Gnome3 debacle, Unity, and consequential explosion of desktops made it much worse.

    14. Re:Mimics Malware by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Usually adding a desktop shortcut is done the same way you do it on Windows.

      Right click desktop add shortcut/launcher.
      Then right click the shortcut and edit the properties.

      You can also create or edit them in a text editor. (You can examine an existing one to see how it is done)

    15. Re:Mimics Malware by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But what do you type into the boxes that pop up? I type path to application and it often doesn't work. So I end up duplicating an existing menu/desktopicon, the modifying that. Windows I make a shortcut to the application.

    16. Re:Mimics Malware by PRMan · · Score: 1

      This has always been my experience with Linux.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    17. Re:Mimics Malware by lhowaf · · Score: 1

      Today, one of my repair shop customers (a senior gentleman), having seen and tried Windows 10 and having seen Microsoft's aggressive tactics, asked if he could get Linux on his laptop. I was so happy and impressed I did it for free (Mint-Cinnamon).

    18. Re:Mimics Malware by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      They can't make better products. The quality of open source options is sufficient now for a large enough % of users that they can't compete on a fair field. Their business model is built around government influence and monopoly control for their product's success and open source is steadily blowing it away from more and more directions. Their intellectual property based business model should have died over a decade ago...

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
    19. Re:Mimics Malware by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      [quote]But what do you type into the boxes that pop up? I type path to application and it often doesn't work.[/quote]

      Well for me, using XFCE on Fedora 23, when I choose "Create/Edit Launcher" (or Properties, Launcher tab) I get Name, Comment, Command, Working Directory (which you can almost always leave empty) and Icon. It's fairly obvious what goes in each.

      In fact if I start typing an application name in "Name" a little popup will appear saying "Create launcher for applicationfoo?" if you click that it automatically populates the fields, including the icon If you do it manually sometimes you have to use the FULL path, but not always.

      And nowadays you have to mark the launcher executable, which happens the first time you use it. but you can chmod +x it on the command line as well.

      And I just created a couple of launchers/desktop icons to double check how easy it is, just to be sure the process hasn't changed much.

      Admittedly, the process in other distros might be different, but that's how it has basically been done it in RedHatty distros for years. Well....ever since I first started using Linux back in 2002. And there's a caveat in that some window managers, especially minimalist ones favored by 'nix graybeards don't use desktop icons. (Though there often is a way to do so)

    20. Re:Mimics Malware by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm a techie who uses Linux professionally and I don't like it either. You're absolutely right about them needing to start standardizing; it's way way overdue. The Gnome3 debacle, Unity, and consequential explosion of desktops made it much worse.

      You can't have your cake and eat it too. As soon as Linux becomes 'standardized', it's only one small step away from being the next Windows, with all the attendant Microsoft-like corporate crap. IMHO, what's happening now with Red Hat and systemd, and what happened earlier with Unity and Gnome 3, occurred precisely because some players were pushing for top-down standardization. The only thing that saved average Linux users like me from being forced to eat one or the other of those crapcakes called Unity and Gnome 3, is the "I'll bloody well do it my way" attitude that permeates Linux culture. So if you want an inflexible monoculture with corporation-like motivations driving OS development, and you like the idea of "Android for Desktops", just keep on pushing for standardization in Linux.

      I've been on Linux exclusively for about 8 years, and I too get frustrated - my two biggest peeves are the Freedesktop filetype / file extension mess, and the lack of fully-featured file-manager-integrated file search that MS managed to get mostly right more than 15 years. But I try to keep in mind that those frustrations are the price I pay for a level of freedom and autonomy that wouldn't be possible to me if I was running Windows, Mac, or some standardized OS.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    21. Re:Mimics Malware by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you do have a point there with the Unity and Gnome3 turds. The distros should have standardized on KDE (since it's easily customizable and themable anyway, so they could have made their own custom themes to differentiate themselves, while users would still be able to easily modify it from there if they wanted), but instead the two major companies came up with their own crappy UIs.

      Still, it seems there really should be more standardization for less-visible stuff, such as package managers. Seriously, what is so different about rpm and dpkg, or apt and yum? It all appears to come down to NIH.

    22. Re:Mimics Malware by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      "Customers can choose to accept or decline the Windows 10 upgrade." (so it must be the customer's fault)

      Whoa... wait. Since when is there a "decline" option?

  9. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cant the makers of XP Antivirus 2010 issue some sort of DMCA cease and desist against Microsoft for infringing on their intellectual property? I believe they were the first ones to invent "Pressing the [ X ] button will initiate installation of said software..."

    1. Re:DMCA by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      +5 Insightful

    2. Re:DMCA by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Just sleazy and unethical.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    3. Re:DMCA by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Just sleazy and unethical.

      Kind of redundant when talking about Microsoft, wouldn't you say?

    4. Re:DMCA by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Just sleazy and unethical.

      Which one? DMCA or Microsoft?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  10. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ha! I call "FUD!" on that. Everyone ASSUMES the devil they don't know is better than the vulnerabilities that have been teased out over time (sometimes a long time) on a previous software. It can never be proven as true since time is forward.

    It's been my experience that people are way more vulnerable in other ways, and most of these OS updates are dubious at best when it comes to being more secure.

    An embedded firmware guy

  11. No by wwalker · · Score: 1

    I don't think "jump the shark" means what you think it mean.

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wikipedia defines it as "an idiom popularized by Jon Hein that was used to describe the moment in the evolution of a television show when it begins a decline in quality, signaled by a particular scene, episode, or aspect of a show in which the writers use some type of gimmick in an attempt to keep viewers' interest, which is taken as a sign of desperation, and is seen by viewers to be the point at which the show strayed irretrievably from its original formula", so I'd say it's close enough.

      Personally, I'd have gone with "Screwed the pooch" or "Shit the bed".

    2. Re:No by macs4all · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wikipedia defines it as "an idiom popularized by Jon Hein that was used to describe the moment in the evolution of a television show when it begins a decline in quality, signaled by a particular scene, episode, or aspect of a show in which the writers use some type of gimmick in an attempt to keep viewers' interest, which is taken as a sign of desperation, and is seen by viewers to be the point at which the show strayed irretrievably from its original formula", so I'd say it's close enough.

      Personally, I'd have gone with "Screwed the pooch" or "Shit the bed".

      But you forgot the originating reference. It's makes no sense without that.

  12. Re:Security by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't move to Windows 10 then you deserve all the security problems you will inevitably have. GUI and "principle" issues aside - it is a smart move.

    Most people should be forced to switch. If you are too dumb to prevent the switch then you are in the camp of people who should be forced to switch. The tears mean its working.

    Windows 10 fits more criteria for "malware" than the most well-known malware suites do. Forcefully installs itself? Check. Spies on you? Check. Displays ads to you? Check. Uninstalls competitors' programs? Check. Doles out your security keys to people on your contact list? Check.

    It's one step away from literally being ransomware.

  13. Microsoft may not want you as a customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Going forward, Microsoft has decided that they need to aggressively dump their old OSs as win10 will be their platform for new products and services. (Mostly services)

    If you don't want to be on win10, maybe you should take the hint and switch to something else.

    Belive it or not I understand MS's point of view here. They know they need to change or simply be left behind. They're actually doing pretty well with their cloud services - Azure and O365 are being adopted like mad.

    I'm surprised they're still charging home users for windows a this point.

    1. Re:Microsoft may not want you as a customer. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How do they get left behind? They're still a monopoly in the corporate world. They could have stayed with Windows 7 (or XP) forever and the corporations would have kept with it forever. Instead they are taking an active step to discard their customer base in a vain attempt to attract phone and tablet users, get a piece of the app store pie, and get a piece of the advertising pie. They will lose here. Existing customes will migrate away in disgust, and new customers will not show up.

    2. Re:Microsoft may not want you as a customer. by TroII · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't want any users as a customer, anymore. The customers now are ad agencies and law enforcement/government. You and your data are the product being sold.

    3. Re:Microsoft may not want you as a customer. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Where are existing customers (particularly corporate ones) going to go? What are new customers going to use instead? All the business software runs on Windows, so customers have no choice. MS is doing the right thing: they're not going to lose any customers no matter how much the annoy them, so anything they can do to screw them over for more profit is the correct move for them.

  14. Best Version of Windows for Whom ? by kjhambrick · · Score: 1

    Microsoft said: "With the free Windows 10 upgrade offer ending on 29 July, we want to help people upgrade to the best version of Windows ...

    trust us ...

    1. Re:Best Version of Windows for Whom ? by pmikell · · Score: 1

      That 29th of July expiry date is a lie; free upgrade offers for products pushed as hard as Windows 10 do not end.

  15. Almost as stupid as Skype by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The X button means fucking **quit**, not "minimize", you UI retards. If you're going to hijack the last 40 years of WIMP then give users an option to enable / disable this shit. Preferably the default would be OFF.

    /Oblg. Microshift joke:

    Microsoft Windows: noun, A 64-bit compilation of 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition with 0 bit of understanding good UI.

    1. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Scott Adams even did a cartoon on how hard it is to kill Skype. When it's misbehaving, most of the time TASKKILL /F is intentionally ignored by Microsoft and they refuse to stop their garbage.

    2. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      When it's misbehaving, most of the time TASKKILL /F is intentionally ignored by Microsoft and they refuse to stop their garbage.

      Wow, really? The Three-Fingered Salute should be the end-all nuclear option of "don't argue with me, just fucking do it."

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    3. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by F.Ultra · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently the X button now means Windows X

    4. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Windows: noun, A 64-bit compilation of 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition with 0 bit of understanding good UI.

      Perfect! You have won one Internets for today!

    5. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by mattventura · · Score: 1

      Hah, good luck with that. Windows is awful at just letting the user do something even if they're an admin. For example, I want to plug in an NTFS drive from another system (maybe to grab some data off of it while the system is being fixed). Is there any way to get Windows to ignore the permissions of those files so that I can access them without having to alter permissions/ownership of the files? Nope. It's literally easier to plug an NTFS drive into a Linux system to grab data off it it than it is on a Windows machine.

    6. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that use case kind of makes sense. If you pull the hard drive out of a computer, all the permissions info on it is about the users on *that computer.* Being able to plug it into another random machine and have it say "oh, well you're admin on this machine so I don't see why not" is precisely one of the things NTFS permissions were designed to not allow, I would assume.

      "Admin? You're not on the admin list *I* know. Take a hike, ya imposter."

      Issues like that were the reason I kept a ~6GB FAT32 partition on my dual-boot machine for awhile. I called it "Decontam" :) Whenever Windows/NTFS got whiney about permissions, move the file in, the FAT kills the permissions, then move it back out.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    7. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by caviare · · Score: 2

      Keep up the geometric progression. That should be with not even half a bit of understanding of good UI.

    8. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      Well, I would say the one exception is when closing windows with an associated service/tray icon. You're closing/quitting the UI, but leaving the service running.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    9. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "is precisely one of the things NTFS permissions were designed to not allow, I would assume."

      You are kind of right: the new OS honors the permissions in the first instance, but is actually able to change them and give itself access.

      This is as simple as taking ownership of the drive for the current user, and replacing permissions on child objects that don't inherit. However, doing this requires a complete traversal of the entire folder structure with a lot of IO to update the ACLs.

      So in practice, you wanted to quickly grab a couple of files? But really you have to wait (a few hours sometimes) for you to get permission to access what you want.

      As the GP wrote: easier to use Linux.

    10. Re:Almost as stupid as Skype by Megol · · Score: 1

      For posting something that is 100% wrong?

  16. Re:Security by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    STFU and go design an OS that's worthwhile bitch.

    --
    C|N>K
  17. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you don't move to Windows 10 then you deserve all the security problems you will inevitably have. GUI and "principle" issues aside - it is a smart move.

    Most people should be forced to switch. If you are too dumb to prevent the switch then you are in the camp of people who should be forced to switch. The tears mean its working.

    Windows 10 fits more criteria for "malware" than the most well-known malware suites do. Forcefully installs itself? Check. Spies on you? Check. Displays ads to you? Check. Uninstalls competitors' programs? Check. Doles out your security keys to people on your contact list? Check.

    It's one step away from literally being ransomware.

    1. Install ransomware on hundreds of millions of computers
    2. PROFIT!

    I think you've uncovered Microsoft's business model.

  18. Time for a class action. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft, you gave us this OS and introduced the masses to the concept of windows in a UI. You were even arrogant enough to name your UI Windows.

    And all this time, we have gone through several iterations of your UI, but one constant has remained; the general understanding that if you click the fucking X located in a specific area of any window in your UI, it closes.

    This has been by design since the dawn of Windows.

    And since you've now taken the path of malware authors with this shady bullshit, we should treat you as such. It's one thing to ask users. It's one thing to force users. It's another matter entirely to trick and deceive users.

    Bottom line is it's time to start the class-action lawsuit. This should not be tolerated in any way. Put another way, if malware was introduced into the core OS and deceived users against Microsoft's wishes, you better believe they would be attacking the cause of that problem and look to put a stop to it.

    1. Re:Time for a class action. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      This has been by design since the dawn of Windows.

      The "X" was added in Windows 95, not Windows 1.01.

      Typical of Windows fanboys to not know their own history.

      Sorry, I was rather busy cutting my teeth on UNIX before Windows 95 came along. Rather glad I acquired that knowledge (which is still useful 25 years later) rather than screwing around with early versions of Windows, which is about as relevant as the point you were attempting to make here.

      Try not to assume so hard next time. I'm hardly a fanboy. Windows sits on my hard drive by force, not by choice.

    2. Re:Time for a class action. by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Bottom line is it's time to start the class-action lawsuit.

      You can't. You "agreed" not to in the EULA, which forces you in to individual neutral arbitration. The Supreme Court upheld this practice as lawful.

      But do please tell me again how EULAs/shrinkwrap licenses are fair, equitable, and necessary...

    3. Re:Time for a class action. by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      People are getting this slightly wrong.

      Microsoft is forcing you to upgrade now. that's the default. Close the window, you accept the default which is to install. Consistent actually.

      The asshole thing is the forced install. "oh but you could change it if you want". You have to look at text, not a button, mouse over it, see that's it's clickable, and then make your choice. It's very asshole very forced.

      If apple fanbois got all weird with a free album, i can't see what a forced download and install would bring up. I assume lawyers are on the move. As someone else has said, the lawyers will get rich, Microsoft will admit nothing and apologize for users not understanding (blame the user) and people will not be made hole but get vouchers for products they don't want.

  19. Free Market by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    So, uh, how's that Free Market workin out for ya, M$... I've never seen you compete in one, and you sure aren't now!

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:Free Market by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Given the rapid adoption of Windows 10, and the fact that it is used far more than OS X and Linux combined, I'd say pretty good.

  20. Re:Blue screen of death by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife accidentally clicked it on her admittedly elderly machine, now it won't boot up, no way to roll it back, all her files are gone.

    This is different than malware... how is that?

    Make a live USB/CD with Linux and retrieve the files that way.

  21. Re:Security by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    If you don't move to Windows 10 then you deserve all the security problems you will inevitably have. GUI and "principle" issues aside - it is a smart move.

    Most people should be forced to switch. If you are too dumb to prevent the switch then you are in the camp of people who should be forced to switch. The tears mean its working.

    Windows 10 fits more criteria for "malware" than the most well-known malware suites do. Forcefully installs itself? Check. Spies on you? Check. Displays ads to you? Check. Uninstalls competitors' programs? Check. Doles out your security keys to people on your contact list? Check.

    It's one step away from literally being ransomware.

    Bitlocker will be enabled by default. If you don't keep subscribing to Windows 10 your bitlocker keys are deleted.

    Thats 2 steps but totally doable.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  22. Re:Security by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just one? Seeing ads on startup and being forced to share more and more information are too high a price for a "free" upgrade.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  23. Re:Security by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Funny

    I could give you many reasons for why you are wrong, but it's simpler to tell a troll like you to go f*ck yourself.

    Microsoft are deeply ashamed of all the Windows that came before 10 and would prefer everyone forget they ever existed. I kind of feel for them.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  24. And people say Apple is arrogant? by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    I can't think of anything the fruit peddler has done that comes close to the arrogance Microsoft is showing regarding anything about Windows 10.

    It's enough to make a cynical paranoid think Microsoft is being paid to be this obnoxious and intrusive. Paid by whom? I'll leave that to the conspiracy theorists.

    Win 10 sounds like a data-collecting piece of spyware, don't it?

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they have NOT given Win10 out for free. The price of Win10 is the elimination of your privacy and a further degradation of control over your own property. It's a steep price for some of us.

    2. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm going to upgrade your car next week. Nothing you can do about it.

      It'll look shinier, but I pulled a few cables, and put your old engine & tires in it.

      Hopefully, I didn't pull too many cables.

      It's just good for you, and free.

      Don't whine if it doesn't work as well as your old car, you were stubbornly refusing to upgrade.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes the upgrade tactics have been heavy handed. But so has the push back

      This is akin to excusing rape because the victim refused consensual sex. Microsoft needing to resort to underhanded tactics to get people to use win10 does not excuse Microsoft needing to resort to underhanded tactics to get people to use win10.

    4. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes the upgrade tactics have been heavy handed. But so has the push back, the FUD from sites like Slashdot and other supposed "tech" blogs. If you have an Android phone and are bitching about Windows 10 you're a fucking hypocrite, full stop.

      Saying "Company X is doing this bad thing, but if given the chance, Company Y would do the exact same thing" does not prove that the thing is fine to do.

      So no, not hypocrisy. If Google were in this situation I'd be criticizing them exactly the same.

      Honestly, I can't 100% blame them. We witnessed how hard people hung onto XP. I still see companies with Windows Server 2003 in play (some of them still DEPLOY 2003). We know there are large swathes of people that simply do not accept change, no matter how good it might be (there are legitimate debates about win10 being better).

      Their marketshare is not my concern. My ability to use my own computer is.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    5. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Why was it a problem that Windows XP users hung on to Windows XP? Vista, like Windows 10, came with a lot of issues that made users evenly split between people who couldn't stand it and people who loved it.

      Had Windows XP users been subject to this kind of harassment to make them upgrade to Vista, then two things would likely have happened.

      First, as I suspect will happen with 10, they'll lose users to alternatives. Admittedly that's Mac now. Back in 2006/7, Ubuntu was actually very good and had a UI a close second behind Mac OS X in terms of user friendliness. There's no doubt in my mind that, at that time, users would have switched to Ubuntu in droves. The post-GNOME 3/Unity debacle makes that an unlikely choice right now for Windows 10 skeptics, but it's certainly making people look elsewhere.

      Second, and more importantly, Windows 7 would never have happened. Windows 7 is the fixed version of Vista, the first usable version of that operating system. Nobody doubts that 10 is imperfect. Even those with machines powerful enough to run it comfortably are concerned about the OS's security/privacy issues, and the forced reboots. Nobody likes this, and in a normal world Microsoft would have felt obliged to fix that.

      What is the incentive for Microsoft to fix the problems with Windows 10?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      We know there are large swathes of people that simply do not accept change, no matter how good it might be

      "Good" is a subjective term, and I'm tired of people who think they know that Windows 7 is "better" (or how "good" it would be to upgrade to) for me.

      The computer I've got runs the software I need. You may think it is "good" to be forced to upgrade just because something is new, but not all of us do.

      But so has the push back, the FUD from sites like Slashdot and other supposed "tech" blogs.

      It's "FUD" to say that Windows 10 doesn't run the one piece of software that I bought the last two computers with Windows 7 to run? Two computers that I bought only because XP doesn't support that same software.

      If you have an Android phone and are bitching about Windows 10 you're a fucking hypocrite, full stop.

      Your arrogance is amazing. I don't know how you come up with this ridiculous insult. I'm guessing that you think that everyone who doesn't like Windows 10 and how pushy MS is over installing it is automatically upgrading their Android version the second it comes out. Sorry to burst your nearsighted bubble, but that's nonsense. I stopped doing updates when 4.2 broke the external storage. My latest phone came with 5.0, and that's where it is staying.

    7. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Yes the upgrade tactics have been heavy handed. But so has the push back, the FUD from sites like Slashdot and other supposed "tech" blogs. If you have an Android phone and are bitching about Windows 10 you're a fucking hypocrite, full stop.

      That'd the majority of /. users, judging from that recent poll "what OS does your phone run." and the comments seen.

      The only google I consciously use is search and youtube and gmail. And as far as gmail goes, that's strictly for job searches and the like. Gmail isn't my "real" email. Oh, and Docs, because I'm too cheap to have Word on any of my home gear. But then again, all I use Docs for is.. resumes.

      Chrome? No thanks. I use firefox. Android? No thanks (for many reasons, not just privacy concerns) Chromebook? Nope.

      For computers I have an old optiplex 740 for a desktop and a dell 6420 for a laptop. both on win 7.

      For "mobile" I use an iphone and an ipad. I'm sure apple is collecting data too, despite going through settings and disabling the obviously intrusive ones. But whom do I trust more? Not MS, for sure, and I trust Google even less.

      The lesser of the three commercial evils is Apple. Purely my own opinion, of course, and I expect serious amounts of hatred from defenders of the other two.

      My next OS will be either OS X or Linux. 7 is my last windows. Been a long road, having used it daily since.. 1992? But, it's over, Microsoft. It's over, and you did it to yourself.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    8. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      It's enough to make a cynical paranoid think Microsoft is being paid to be this obnoxious and intrusive. Paid by whom? I'll leave that to the conspiracy theorists.

      Does the term "Windows NSA edition" give you any ideas? After watching from the sidelines (I use Linux exclusively) the lengths MS goes to, trying to get 10 on EVERYbodys system, I'd guess that name would be 100% accurate...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    9. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree with you except for one small change:

      Their market share is not my concern. My ability to own my own computer is.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't even get me started on TPM, SecureBoot, etc. :P

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    11. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by geek · · Score: 1

      Yes the upgrade tactics have been heavy handed. But so has the push back, the FUD from sites like Slashdot and other supposed "tech" blogs. If you have an Android phone and are bitching about Windows 10 you're a fucking hypocrite, full stop.

      Saying "Company X is doing this bad thing, but if given the chance, Company Y would do the exact same thing" does not prove that the thing is fine to do.

      So no, not hypocrisy. If Google were in this situation I'd be criticizing them exactly the same.

      Honestly, I can't 100% blame them. We witnessed how hard people hung onto XP. I still see companies with Windows Server 2003 in play (some of them still DEPLOY 2003). We know there are large swathes of people that simply do not accept change, no matter how good it might be (there are legitimate debates about win10 being better).

      Their marketshare is not my concern. My ability to use my own computer is.

      Google IS doing it with Android. So why aren't you complaining? Because you're a hypocrite.

    12. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Well then why don't you submit an article to the queue explaining how and I'll go complain there as well. This article is about Windows 10 and I'm staying on-topic.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    13. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I have an Android phone because is the least bad of the alternatives out there not because I'm happy with it being a data-gathering channel for Google . In iOS you have even less control over your device. I don't even count Windows Phone after what Ms has done to Windows 10.
      No OS should spy you, should have ads, should prevent you from completely controlling your device. Windows used to be a decent OS that complied with that. Now it isn't.

    14. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, one of my main software programs, mach3, only works on xp. That computer is not on the internet.

    15. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The problem is trying to get the user base to move forward. That by itself is hostile to the customer. It is an attitude that the customer is wrong. Then they take is further by forcing the customer to move forward against their will. What other corporation can succeed by insulting and abusing their customer base? Its like an automaker refusing to fix airbags in last year's model in order to force customer's to buy this year's model.

      Microsoft should NOT be moving ahead without the customers. There is no reason to do so. There is no mandate to have newer incompatible versions of Windows! The customers have a product that works, a product that is supported for many more years, and they're happy with it. Microsoft should stop and look at what customers like about Windows and what customers dislike about Windows, and Microsoft has NEVER done this as they constantly make changes against what customers like.

      Microsoft apologized for Windows 8, but now they are making the same mistakes and doubling down on it.

    16. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      On the desktop, I have a dual-boot Windows 8.1 and Linux Mint install, with a Windows 7 VM in VirtualBox on Mint. I spend 95% of my time booting Linux, honestly not so much for idealogical reasons, but because of a job I had a couple years ago where I got fairly comfortable with the command line and honestly I got rather tired of clicking around Windows Explorer to navigate when I can use tab auto-complete, cd, rm, etc. as fast or faster anyway. And I have XFCE for my desktop so I don't have to wrestle with all the recent Windows UI bullshit either.

      Then once I got used to it and eventually got the VM started, there's little reason for me to actually go back other than Visual Studio (as mentioned elsewhere, Win 8+ no longer lets me run old circa-2000 games that I still can on 7). This whole issue came up when my old Win 7 machine died last summer and due to the backlash I heard about the spying, I bought my replacement tower like 3 weeks before the big Win 10 rollout.

      So. Comparing that experience to Android...

      I have an Android phone, but I'm not really obsessed with it. Mostly I just use it for Google maps and occasionally checking things online when I'm not at home/don't want to boot up the desktop to handle stuff. Never bothered to spend any money on a paid app in the 15ish months I've had it. Since I have a desktop, I don't even have WiFi at home.

      The catch with Google Maps is that to get directions, you more or less need to enable location tracking. Which isn't great, but allegedly (by the TLAs themselves) The Man can track you via GPS even when your phone is "turned off" so I have either a choice between using Maps (I have a terrible sense of direction), or getting a different phone entirely.

      Google is basically an ad company. I expect them to spy on me and sell all my information to anybody they can. So I minimize somewhat what I tell them, don't facebook on my phone, and just try to live with it as the privacy intrusion that it is. Call the privacy loss the "price" I'm paying to use the service.

      If I *could* use Google services without them spying on me, I would.

      So. Microsoft and Google are both doing things I don't like. However I still use both of them more and less of the time.

      Moral of the story: If I didn't use anything I ethically objected to, I'd be sitting in a cave somewhere.

      Computers and technical goods, you trace to getting spied on and marketed to. Owning a car--car companies largely support the oil industry and nastiness in the Middle East. Using public roads and paying taxes implies support of the government. Using electricity supports the fossil fuel industry, contributing to global warming. Using paper supports rainforest deforestation, etc., etc., etc.

      So I suppose if one is sufficiently pigheaded, one can label it "hypocrisy." However I'm sick and tired of people throwing around that word so freely, so why don't we just call it "I have different priorities than you."

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    17. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      is automatically upgrading their Android version the second it comes out

      Assuming you even can :P I'm on 4.4.2 right now and my phone claims it's up-to-date.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    18. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, Microsoft shouldn't do any of the things you suggest. Instead, Microsoft should look for any way it can to make more profit by screwing over their customers. This is the correct thing for them to do, because profit is their reason for existence. If customers don't like it, they can find another vendor, but they won't, as we've seen, so unlike other companies where they need to worry about customer perception and reputation, MS doesn't, so they might as well maximize profit any way they can, no matter what the customers think about it.

    19. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This is normally true. However they already have customers leaving Microsoft in droves. They don't need Windows to read email or check twitter, the phones do that now. And the corporate people are now starting to move a bit more to Linux, OSX, web-applications, etc.

    20. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      However they already have customers leaving Microsoft in droves. They don't need Windows to read email or check twitter, the phones do that now.

      These people are individual, casual users who never did much with their PCs anyway, and were going to leave Windows anyway. So it makes perfect sense for MS to extract more revenue from the existing home users with their spyware. The people who haven't left yet aren't going to.

      And the corporate people are now starting to move a bit more to Linux, OSX, web-applications, etc..

      Sorry, I haven't seen this at all. Every corporation of any size is still using Outlook + Exchange for email.

    21. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Those casual people appear to be the ones that Windows 10 is focusing on, what with the new metro apps and app store, etc. The spyware however affects everyone not just the home users who are leaving. The forced updates is definitely focused on the dumb users. Even in the small business side they're being treated like the dumb users; you can't get the ability to delay updates for a significant time unless you're an Enterprise user.

      I agree that Exchange server is still a big lock in the corporate world, but more things are able to talk to it as long as the corporation isn't using Exchange specific features (like sending forms to be filled out). Phones can read email and calandar from exchange server. I do see more corporations using other stuff, especially on the tech side where Windows doesn't offer much if you're not a Windows developer or doing hardware (though more more Linux capable EDA tools now).

    22. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: If I didn't use anything I ethically objected to, I'd be sitting in a cave somewhere.

      I have given the subject some thought. Right now the benefits of whoring myself out to commercial and government interests (by being a "consumer," by paying taxes, etc) outweigh my desire to cut all ties with commerce and government.

      The desire for total independence is there. But not the cojones. *

      Not yet, anyway. Ask me again in 10 years. 'way things are going... yeah.

      * God damn it slashdot, it's 2016, and it's $@#! ridiculous I can't type alt-162 to get an accented lowercase "o"! I mean, I can TYPE it in, but when previewed or viewed it shows up as A(someothergarbage)

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    23. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      "...oh, and the doors don't work."

    24. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the system that came with windows pre-installed doesn't have a dvd burner, and attempts to install various other OSes onto a USB key failed, so no way to boot from another OS and then install it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    25. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I'm going to upgrade your car next week. Nothing you can do about it.

      It'll look shinier, but I pulled a few cables, and put your old engine & tires in it.

      Hopefully, I didn't pull too many cables.

      It's just good for you, and free.

      Don't whine if it doesn't work as well as your old car, you were stubbornly refusing to upgrade.

      I get what you're saying but I can still come to your garage and tell you to fuck off. Granted if I tell you to fuck off out on the street when you say its going to happen you will but still do it anyway, but I can make you not do it.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    26. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by geoskd · · Score: 1

      On the other, those people hanging on help to deteriorate the security posture of the rest of the internet and harm Microsofts reputation when they get hit with malware or other security issues.

      Then Microsoft should do the right thing and cough up some of their ill gotten fortune to maintain that old shit code they wrote. If they don't want to do that, open source it so that others can do the maintenance. They made their bed when they wrote the shitty code in the first place, and should be held responsible for the consequences of that choice, if for no other reason than to serve as a warning to others.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    27. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Keep clicking on that 'deny' button microsoft gave you then.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    28. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Keep clicking on that 'deny' button microsoft gave you then.

      Are you talking about the red x? because that's not a deny button. Nothing on the scheduled notification is. That is dodgy as fuck I'll agree but that's not to say you can't avoid it. It's only going to install itself if you don't stop it. Again, it is bad but to pretend there's nothing you can do about it is wrong.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    29. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      It's only going to install itself if you don't stop it.

      That's exactly what I mean by 'keep clicking on the deny button'.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    30. Re:And people say Apple is arrogant? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I can't 100% blame them. We witnessed how hard people hung onto XP. I still see companies with Windows Server 2003 in play (some of them still DEPLOY 2003). We know there are large swathes of people that simply do not accept change, no matter how good it might be (there are legitimate debates about win10 being better).

      I could see Microsoft's point if their primary purpose in making changes was to enhance security and extend functionality. But in that case they could have (mostly) kept XP and built on it, couldn't they? I think people fail to accept change largely because so much of it seems both retrograde and arbitrary, like re-inventing the wheel as a dodecagon. As for Win10 being better, I haven't tried it, so this question is sincere: is there anything in it that's materially better than previous versions, that couldn't have come about by naturally evolving from XP without drastically altering a UI paradigm that most people found both comfortable and productive?

      On the one hand Microsoft should be saying "screw them" and just move on. On the other, those people hanging on help to deteriorate the security posture of the rest of the internet and harm Microsofts reputation when they get hit with malware or other security issues.

      Microsoft has an enormous user base. Trying to get that user base to move forward is painful. They're giving the OS out for free and people still push back.

      For the second time in as many weeks you've caused me to examine my own sacred cows, so thanks. I can see how Microsoft almost has to push an upgrade really hard. Their deceptiveness still seems sleazy though, and probably wouldn't be necessary if they weren't forcing drastic changes in the UX and the business model instead of simply updating the security and maintainability of the OS.

      ... I have a very hard time taking these complaints seriously when in every case the people bitching are using Google for everything they can. Microsoft isn't doing anything with Win10 that Google isn't doing with Android/Chrome/Search and a plethora of web analytics.

      Google lulled people to sleep, like the proverbial lobster slowly heating to a boil. Except for Android phones, (which are hardware that just happens to come with software), Google's products have never cost money. Microsoft software does cost money, and that's the perception even among people who only have Windows because it came on their computer. After all, lots of people have pirated MS software, so the fact that it costs money is widely known. How many people have ever pirated Google software? I think that has a lot to do with the inconsistency you call hypocrisy - in this case most people aren't aware that they're being hypocritical.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  25. It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From what I see, it schedules the upgrade, and you have to opt out by going into some other settings to cancel.

    It's not that the "X" activates the upgrade - at that point, it's too late.

    Still, it's very shady not to give users an obvious choice on the popup, let alone not making it an "opt in" choice.

    All of my machines are running Windows 10... shrugs... at this point, all the bitching is basically all about the point of the matter. Win 10 runs fine on the machines I've installed it on (several laptops, 9 or 10 desktops, some 10+ years old). Unless you have some particularly specific niche software or hardware (that can't run in Win7, therefore, not in Win10, since the drivers are mostly the same), people really shouldn't have too many complaints.

    I'd be more concerned if Microsoft was pushing people to Win8 and the crappy fail that was the Metro Start Screen. Win10 dialed it back and makes more sense in the case of a desktop/mobile hybrid OS. Still, the exec who is pushing this sort of tactic needs to be fired ASAP.

    1. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by sconeu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are missing the point of why people don't want Win10.

      I was planning on doing the upgrade. And then I read about the mandatory spyware. You know, the phone-home that you cannot disable unless you are running an Enterprise version?

      Some people don't want to have that. Others CANNOT have that and remain within the bounds of the law (*cough*HIPAA*cough*).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Kinwolf · · Score: 1

      From what I see, it schedules the upgrade, and you have to opt out by going into some other settings to cancel.

      It's not that the "X" activates the upgrade - at that point, it's too late.

      Still, it's very shady not to give users an obvious choice on the popup, let alone not making it an "opt in" choice.

      All of my machines are running Windows 10... shrugs... at this point, all the bitching is basically all about the point of the matter. Win 10 runs fine on the machines I've installed it on (several laptops, 9 or 10 desktops, some 10+ years old). Unless you have some particularly specific niche software or hardware (that can't run in Win7, therefore, not in Win10, since the drivers are mostly the same), people really shouldn't have too many complaints.

      I'd be more concerned if Microsoft was pushing people to Win8 and the crappy fail that was the Metro Start Screen. Win10 dialed it back and makes more sense in the case of a desktop/mobile hybrid OS. Still, the exec who is pushing this sort of tactic needs to be fired ASAP.

      I upgrade 2 out of 3 of our coputers to 10. But the last one is our HTPC with Windows 8 + Media Center on it. Media Center doesn't exist on windows 10 and never will so the last thing I want on that computer is the upgrade. Having to go through all this non-sense to avoid the "upgrade" is unacceptable. We're not dealing with a shady company from Ukraine or India here, this is Microsoft for crying out loud! This is insane. I am totally p*ssed at M$ right now.

    3. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by StormReaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless you have some particularly specific niche software or hardware (that can't run in Win7, therefore, not in Win10, since the drivers are mostly the same)....

      Windows 10 auto-installed on a customer's newish Windows 7 computer, hosing the entire installation. I installed Kubuntu 15.10, and now he's a happy camper. He said his computer works better now than it did before.

      Windows 10 is a gift to the Linux world.

    4. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1, Troll

      From what I see, it schedules the upgrade, and you have to opt out by going into some other settings to cancel.

      It's not that the "X" activates the upgrade - at that point, it's too late.

      Still, it's very shady not to give users an obvious choice on the popup, let alone not making it an "opt in" choice.

      All of my machines are running Windows 10... shrugs... at this point, all the bitching is basically all about the point of the matter. Win 10 runs fine on the machines I've installed it on (several laptops, 9 or 10 desktops, some 10+ years old). Unless you have some particularly specific niche software or hardware (that can't run in Win7, therefore, not in Win10, since the drivers are mostly the same), people really shouldn't have too many complaints.

      I'd be more concerned if Microsoft was pushing people to Win8 and the crappy fail that was the Metro Start Screen. Win10 dialed it back and makes more sense in the case of a desktop/mobile hybrid OS. Still, the exec who is pushing this sort of tactic needs to be fired ASAP.

      True, apparently most users think this is the "we will NOW upgrade your PC" dialogue box and just close it to cancel the upgrade. But instead, this is the " We have SCHEDULED your upgrade, and here you can change some options about the schedule or start the upgrade right now" box. And closing the dialogue does nothing about the schedule.

      People just seem to click away everything which is put in front of them. If they would actually READ the text, they would see that in the middle of the dialogue, it says "click HERE to change upgrade schedule or cancel scheduled upgrade": http://core0.staticworld.net/i...

      But apparently reading text is too hard these days.

      Disclaimer: I do not say Microsoft are right in the way they try to distribute this upgrade. But some accusations (like that they changed this dialogue to start the upgrade even though people "X it away") are just stupid. It's just a consequence of them making it a "recommended" update plus the update settings the user himself chose.

    5. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      (that can't run in Win7, therefore, not in Win10, since the drivers are mostly the same), people really shouldn't have too many complaints.

      Classic games from around 2000 like Civilization II, Alpha Centauri, etc., still ran fine on Windows 7. Since then, you need a VM. They took out the compatibility mode settings for 16-bit programs.

      So combine that with the fact that there have been literally zero value-add features that I wanted since 7, and several bad features added like the UI and spying, and you can see why someone might not want to upgrade.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    6. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by I4ko · · Score: 1

      MS is all run by Indians now, and Indians develop the software. Same for Dell (East Pakistan) so for all intents and purposes MS is an Indian company. What those ppl don't get is that by replacing all Americans with cheap overseas labor, the company will only be profitable for the short duration the Americans still have their savings, which is measured on the fingers of the hand of a lathe worker.

    7. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by adler187 · · Score: 1

      Right. The dialog is just informing you that the upgrade is scheduled. You can dismiss the dialog and let it upgrade as scheduled by clicking on the OK button or the close button. If you don't want to upgrade at the scheduled time, you can upgrade immediately by clicking Upgrade Now or change the time or cancel it by clicking the "here" link below the scheduled date. It's all in the dialog and not really confusing at all if you actually read it. This is like people complaining that when they delete the shortcut from the desktop, the application is still installed.

      Of course, Microsoft are not making it as simple as could be by just putting a "Change or Cancel" button next to the Upgrade now and OK buttons. Instead, they do the old Real Player "hide the link you actually want" game to trick clueless users in to getting something they may not have wanted.

    8. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to use an OS that fills my "live tiles" with advertisements for Xbox or herbal Viagra.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The lack of control over updates and when the computer reboots is pretty awful too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Kjella · · Score: 1

      All of my machines are running Windows 10... shrugs... (...) I'd be more concerned if Microsoft was pushing people to Win8 and the crappy fail that was the Metro Start Screen.

      You got 2 + 2 but can't add it up to 4... what happens the next time Microsoft has a bright idea? You're strapped in for the ride whether you like it or not. Does it look like they care what their customers want? Does it look like they'll take no for an answer? I think Microsoft has looked at their past failures and decided they were right and the users were wrong but the users were in charge. That's going to change with Win10, you're now on a very short leash and when Microsoft yanks you follow. No more "thanks but I'd rather stay on WinXP/Win7 the rest of the decade" or "hell no, I'm not installing your telemetry spyware". Of course they're being nice now, even strangers in a van has figured out you offer free candy not free broccoli. That does not mean it's going to end well.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by john.r.strohm · · Score: 1

      You miss the point.

      I am one of the people who got bitten by this.

      I *DID* *NOT* *AT* *ANY* *TIME* give my consent for this upgrade. I *DID* *NOT* *AT* *ANY* *TIME* give Microsoft permission to "schedule" this upgrade.

      They pulled a Nike. They Just Did It.

      If that is consensual, then I say Microsoft just consented to have their headquarters remodeled using tactical nuclear weapons.

    12. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      They already opted in by agreeing to install the recommended updates. This message is just a reminder from Microsoft that they opted in to those updates and a particular update is scheduled. In other words, MS is going out of the way to keep the user informed. It's not a "dirty trick" or anything misleading. Just go opt out of the updates. There is no reason to expect them to provide a 'dont do this' option right on the reminder dialog.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    13. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      The lack of control over updates and when the computer reboots is pretty awful too.

      Do you mean the inability to go schedule updates? It's literally the first setting in Control Panel.

    14. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      At most you can defer them for a while, and while you can schedule them to be done at certain times you can't delay forever. Eventually Windows will force-reboot your machine.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 never auto-installs. If you're too illiterate to read what the screen says then that's not Microsoft's fault.

      Really ? MS advertises Windows as something that is good for non technical users; it does what people reasonably expect. But the whole way that the prompt is laid out is to misdirect the user, it pushes them to accept the default and obscures what will happen until it is too late. In short: it is deceptive.

    16. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      True, apparently most users think this is the "we will NOW upgrade your PC" dialogue box and just close it to cancel the upgrade. But instead, this is the " We have SCHEDULED your upgrade, and here you can change some options about the schedule or start the upgrade right now" box. And closing the dialogue does nothing about the schedule.

      Microsoft have done enormous research into UI (User Interfaces) so it is inconceivable that they did not know that this is how many people would understand what was happening -- and then be surprised when the upgrade happened. What they have done breaks all good practice in good user interaction.

      It is OK to push hard an update that does something like fixing a security hole, the fix basically does nothing except fix the bug. It is something completely different to push hard something that makes drastic changes to the machine and potentially leaves some parts of it not working (eg 3rd party software or drivers) and, in some cases leaves the machine unable to boot. In every case when upgrading a machine to a new version of the operating system the first instruction is ''back up all data''. Microsoft does not even give users a chance, it just does it.

      The other thing that Microsoft have done is to change the status of the upgrade, so that people with increasingly conservative update policies slowly get caught by this. They have put what they want as more important than what their customers might want.

    17. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you carry a smartphone (iOS or Android), you *ALREADY* are carrying around a device that generates reams of telemetry back to the cellular carrier, manufacturer, and OS maker and generates a full record of your movement by which cell towers you connect to or which wi-fi hotspots it sees.

      Enough with this red herring.

      My phone doesn't have access to the files on my computers - I repeat, my computers, not Microsoft's - where I keep my private data. My computers, not my phone, store my tax documents, source code, proprietary work product and trade secrets, client data and invoicing, my passwords to everything, backups of family members' computers containing much of the same personal information, etc. My computers, not my phone, are where I conduct online banking and shopping and do anything else involving financial transactions and credentials. All of that data is private, and no one has permission to go fishing through it trying to "monetize" me or "enhance my experience." This is non-negotiable.

      Google (or NSA) can siphon whatever they want off my phone. They'll find out I play Words with Friends, check Slashdot and Ars while I'm taking a dump, send and receive mostly boring emails on the account connected to the phone, and probably am overzealous about the number of server monitoring texts I have set up. If I really don't want to be physically tracked for some reason, I can leave the phone somewhere or pull the battery and drop the phone in a Faraday bag.

      Just because I'm relatively OK with my phone being "leaky," and therefore rather cautious about what winds up there, does not mean I also must accept anyone mining through my private data on my computers. They are two entirely different worlds.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    18. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is a gift to the Linux world.

      Only on Slashdot.

      To the rest of the U.S., at least, Windows 10 was a gift to the OS X world.

    19. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is insane. I am totally p*ssed at M$ right now.

      Yeah, and what are you going to do about it? Take your business elsewhere? Apparently not, so why should MS care about you being pissed?

      Since people like you are unwilling to leave the Windows platform, it's better for MS to force you all onto Windows 10 and its spyware so they can make more money by spying on you and selling that information.

    20. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Has anyone tried to schedule a "shutdown -a" (Cancel scheduled shutdown) job in task scheduler, to run every 15 seconds? Jobs added to the task scheduler can be run in the SYSTEM context, so it should have sufficient privileges to stop a planned shutdown.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    21. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is a gift to the Linux world.

      Only on Slashdot.
      To the rest of the U.S., at least, Windows 10 was a gift to the OS X world.

      I wonder if it is OS X or Chrome OS that will gain the most?

    22. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Great! Have fun with the spyware and the Metro UI! I certainly won't miss you.

    23. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is a gift to the Linux world.

      Only on Slashdot. To the rest of the U.S., at least, Windows 10 was a gift to the OS X world.

      I wonder if it is OS X or Chrome OS that will gain the most?

      Well, if people do their homework, no one that is leaving Windows 10 because of Spying will go anywhere NEAR ChromeOS...

    24. Re: It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Your cell phone broadcasts telemetry all the time, whether you request it or not. That's how cell phones affiliate to towers. Your preferences that you set on the phone only affect data available to the apps running on the phone, and not the firmware itself. Additionally, the carrier usually has the ability to remotely enable or disable certain hardware on the phone without user intervention, via cellular firmware drivers. This is because the same CPU that runs your apps is also interacting with the cellular radio, which is under the carrier's control, and not you.

    25. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      But apparently reading text is too hard these days.

      Tell me about it. Some kid I know asked me to install the sims 4 or some shit game on his laptop. Fine, whatever, hand it over, clicky clicky clicky and it's installing. I hand it back to him and say there you go. Not two minutes later he's back complaining that it's not working despite it still saying on the screen in quite an obvious way "INSTALLING" with a progress bar. On questioning why he was trying to start it while it was quite blatantly still installing he basically said he refuses to read any dialog boxes, not can't be bothered, refuses to. Fucking whatever kid, good luck with that.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    26. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      You miss the point.

      I am one of the people who got bitten by this.

      I *DID* *NOT* *AT* *ANY* *TIME* give my consent for this upgrade. I *DID* *NOT* *AT* *ANY* *TIME* give Microsoft permission to "schedule" this upgrade.

      They pulled a Nike. They Just Did It.

      If that is consensual, then I say Microsoft just consented to have their headquarters remodeled using tactical nuclear weapons.

      Not to be unsympathetic but at some point you did. There was a big enough noise when they made it a recommended update and they said that it would automatically go through for anyone with auto updates on (do you have auto updates on?) Not that it's right in any way and they did dick you, but you had an opportunity to sidestep that dick if you'd only been paying enough attention to see it coming.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    27. Re:It's already scheduled, not caused by "X" by houghi · · Score: 1

      Just because I'm relatively OK with my phone being "leaky," and therefore rather cautious about what winds up there, does not mean I also must accept anyone mining through my private data on my computers. They are two entirely different worlds.

      Why are we ok that these are two different worlds? Why is it not ok to have the same privacy on one device, but expect it on another?

      By being ok they can do it with a phone, you have given them a finger and they will take your arm. We should give them the finger. To me a phone is just another device with computing power and I expect the same with anything else, be it a server, desktop, laptop, tablet, phone, watch, car, fridge, toaster or whatever has computing power (or lack of it).

      It is pretty simple: DO NOT USE MY DATA!

      I do not even want them to use my data on their servers. Not even when I clicked OK. There is no need to explain that I clicked OK and they have the right to do so. That does not mean I WANT that to happen and there is no need to defend them. They have lawyers who do that for a living.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  26. Re:Security by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    What do you mean "one step away from literally being ransomware?"

    Anyone who's tried to restore their former system and had it partially fail or trash their OS install completely is going to have to pay one way or another.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  27. So this is just now... by Lorens · · Score: 3, Informative

    In a surprising coincidence, I had just finished reading this article when my son burst in saying "Hey Dad something's strange with the gaming PC, it's shutting down saying it's configuring itself for the Windows 10 upgrade, but I never accept that!"

    I have a backup . . .

    1. Re:So this is just now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know your son is lying

      I have a headless windows 7 fileserver in my 5 person office (so, no, I'm not going to shell out bullshit money for enterprise windows, thanks). Had, actually. We got in the office this Monday and right away the accountant noticed that quickbooks was down, and thus we noticed the fileserver was offline. Hooked up a monitor and sometime over the weekend it decided to upgrade to windows 10.

      No idea why shills like you keep insisting that people must be pushing the wrong button. Is the "X" button the wrong button now? Are you going to tell us we're holding the mouse wrong (cf holding the iPhone wrong)?

      Want an easy way

      And people tell me that fucking with random system shit means that Linux isn't ready for the desktop

    2. Re:So this is just now... by john.r.strohm · · Score: 1

      Why don't you test that for us, and report back on how it went?

      My reaction was that I was irreversibly f*cked when it got to the EULA.

      I'm now hearing that I *MIGHT* have 30 days (from Sunday) to back it out. And then we play the game all over again...

    3. Re:So this is just now... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This is *exactly* what this article is about, users are tricked into accepting the upgrade without clicking on "accept". They are NOT voluntarily asking to be upgraded. So why are you defending Microsoft here, why do you still insist that Microsoft would never stoop to dirty tricks, why do you insist it is still the fault of the users despite evidence to the contrary?

    4. Re:So this is just now... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      You probably had never changed Windows 7 from the default behavior of automatically installing recommended updates.

      The issue is that MS moved the Win10 upgrade into the recommended updates channel a while back, causing all these auto-installs.

      I actually almost didn't catch it in my organization. We use WSUS and I nearly approved the Windows 10 upgrade by accident...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    5. Re:So this is just now... by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      I know your son is lying

      I have a headless windows 7 fileserver in my 5 person office (so, no, I'm not going to shell out bullshit money for enterprise windows, thanks). Had, actually. We got in the office this Monday and right away the accountant noticed that quickbooks was down, and thus we noticed the fileserver was offline. Hooked up a monitor and sometime over the weekend it decided to upgrade to windows 10.

      No idea why shills like you keep insisting that people must be pushing the wrong button. Is the "X" button the wrong button now? Are you going to tell us we're holding the mouse wrong (cf holding the iPhone wrong)?

      Want an easy way

      And people tell me that fucking with random system shit means that Linux isn't ready for the desktop

      Why would you auto-install updates on a critical server in the first place? You schedule downtime and maintenance and would've caught this had not been lazy.

    6. Re:So this is just now... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Make sure you've got a backup of your files, and software. I've had three customers decide to revert after seeing Win10, and discussing their options with me, and two of those reversions failed.

      Sure, it got rid of Win10, but blue-screened trying to boot Win7. I suspect Win10 had hosed the MBR when it "Upgraded" the disc to GPT, but the reversion process couldn't undo it. I spent hours trying to fix them before giving up, but at least they got a clean format & re-install.

      And a copy of GWX Control Panel.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    7. Re:So this is just now... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I know your son is lying

      I have a headless windows 7 fileserver in my 5 person office (so, no, I'm not going to shell out bullshit money for enterprise windows, thanks). Had, actually. We got in the office this Monday and right away the accountant noticed that quickbooks was down, and thus we noticed the fileserver was offline. Hooked up a monitor and sometime over the weekend it decided to upgrade to windows 10.

      No idea why shills like you keep insisting that people must be pushing the wrong button. Is the "X" button the wrong button now? Are you going to tell us we're holding the mouse wrong (cf holding the iPhone wrong)?

      Want an easy way

      And people tell me that fucking with random system shit means that Linux isn't ready for the desktop

      So basically the pc had recommended updates on and no one bothered to sort it out when they moved 10 to 'recommended' and then whenever the box came up someone just fucked it off instead of reading it?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    8. Re:So this is just now... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Why don't you test that for us, and report back on how it went?

      My reaction was that I was irreversibly f*cked when it got to the EULA.

      I'm now hearing that I *MIGHT* have 30 days (from Sunday) to back it out. And then we play the game all over again...

      Just turn recommended updates off. C'mon people it's not that hard. Maybe slightly inconvenient but there you go.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:So this is just now... by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Those kind of hacks are not very user friendly, and neither is MS's approach. It needs to be fixed so that there is a Yes/No/Ask Again in 10 days + "remember my choice" tickbox. Is that hard?

    10. Re:So this is just now... by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly why I never install ANY windows updates. I trust my ability to protect myself from malware more than I trust what MS will push down onto my system. I also would rather re-install the system when it does get hosed from a mistake rather than put up with all the reboots and degrading performance from the MS updates. I have been doing it this way since the days of WIN98 and it has served me well. Besides, back then you had to re-install every 18 months or so anyway just because of sludge in the OS files that slowed everything down.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    11. Re:So this is just now... by chispito · · Score: 1

      I have a backup . . .

      Give Windows 10 a chance before restoring. I like it a lot better. Better UI, better console host, better a lot of things, really.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  28. Nailed my coworkers business by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    One of my fellow engineers also owns a pet store (run by his wife and son). Over the weekend their computer that runs their point of sale software upgraded itself. The store's software does not run on Windows 10, so this was a mess for them while they spent the effort and time to downgrade. He is suitably pissed.

    1. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe your fellow engineer should manage that mission critical computer and not have it just install updates on its own.

    2. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      I had similar thoughts. The pet store is a side business, and he'd rather spend his focus on work first, and IT support a distant second.

    3. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has been emphasizing for years that you really must have recommended updates turned on, to keep the computer safe. It's BS to claim at this point that it is the users' own fault for having it on.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    4. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely amazed that something that ran under Windows 7 SP2 (or W8.1) does not run under W10. I'm trying to determine a condition where something would be so no-compliantly written as to still operate on either of those two systems, but somehow fail to run using the compatibility mode built into 10.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Engineer is not the same as IT flunky (who are generally brainwashed into loving Microsoft anyway). It's like saying "you're a scientist, how come you don't change your own engine oil?" Never mind that doing the IT accepted practice of allowing all recommended updates (which I do not do) is what got the machine upgraded in the first place.

    6. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I rarely see point of sale software that isn't doing non-standard things like replacing the shell or locating files in user inaccessible file locations or directly accessing hardware.

      UAC and file system permissions are the biggest problems to older code written for XP and earlier. Another issue is non-signed executables.

      Hell, QuickBooks was a piece of software that completely snubbed Windows best practices for well into the Windows Vista days, locating key configurations in HKLM and C:\Program Files (both not user-writable)

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    7. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe next time he'll think twice about trusting this company to be their vendor.

      I doubt it though. Like everyone else, he'll continue using their software and bitching about it.

    8. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know what they did to the software so it would run on windows 7 but not 10. only thing i can think of off hand is some driver that's badly signed and wont work on 10 but would on 7.

    9. Re:Nailed my coworkers business by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Maybe your fellow engineer should manage that mission critical computer and have it install updates to keep up to date with all security patches... oh wait... that was last week's recommendation. Never mind.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  29. Re:The Best Version of Windows by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    Facebook and Twitter are public forums. Although they do some evil things, the expectation of any kind of privacy in a public forum is orders of magnitude less than what one expects from their PC (which, on every OS I have ever known beside Win10, keeps everything locally except for mild telemetry).

  30. Re:Security by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    If you do, on an older machine, you may well get driver issues and software incompatibilities. I have a number of laptops from circa 2010-2012, and Windows 10 is basically unusable on them. I am gradually purchasing SSDs and reinstalling Windows 7 on them (may as well do the SSD upgrade while I'm at it). I have a friend who's laptop failed to do the update properly and was left in an unbootable state, at which point he was talking about taking it to a repair man to get the data off and buying a new laptop. That is the kind of nightmare the non-tech-savvy are put into. As for security problems, if Microsoft really cared about security, they would do a better job of designing Windows. They intentionally put in may hidden cubbyholes for proprietary software and oem customisations to take advantage of, and much malware thrives on this sort of thing. If companies like MS made things as simple as possible, security would be much more straightforward.

    --
    John_Chalisque
  31. Another Nasty Surprise: Flash installed by default by Tiger4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Over the weekend I set up a new Win 10 machine for Dad (store bought HP Envy). Going through updates and installs I found one nasty surprise, Flash was installed by default on this box. I was hoping to wean him over to HTML5 with this upgrade (from Vista !), but HP builds them with Flash already in place. Went ahead and made Firefox64 the default browser, and Chrome as an alternative, but since Cortana and all MS services default to MS Edge no matter what you set, it's going to be a mixed operation from now on

    --
    Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
  32. Re:Security by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    They don't encrypt your data and threaten to withhold it without paying a subscription or consenting to their spyware/adware.

    At least not yet.

  33. EU by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Given the long-held tradition of US FedGov doing jack-shit for consumers, I've hoped that the EU regulators will yet-again drag Microsoft by their tiny, tiny balls back into court and brutalize them like MS is doing to Win 7/8 users, but the silence is deafening. Perhaps Brexit is taking up all their cycles?

  34. Shady Malware Practice by maharvey · · Score: 1

    This is the same crap that malware distributors use to trick you into installing garbage on your system, displaying fake windows with fake widgets.

    Why not just force the install without any user interaction at all? That would be more honest. This aren't getting consent, they aren't allowing user choice, so why the trickery to somehow involve the user in a process you're going to do with or without them?

    The only think I can think is that it is a victim-blaming manipulation strategy. Most people will try to close the window, see that the install launched, assume they made a mistake (that they can't verify because now the window has vanished), then after the panic subsides, sigh and resign themselves to their fate. So they'll blame themselves instead of blaming Microsoft.

    I already knew I didn't trust them. It's nice to be vindicated, I guess. It certainly pours gasoline on my cynicism and paranoia regarding humanity.

  35. Re: Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. How hard it is to understand that I bought Windows 7 and that's exactly what I was delivered. If I need 10, I would have upgraded already. What makes Microsoft think they can change product their one sided decision to something else?

    Car analogy would be you take your car in shop for periodic maintenance only to find vendor changed model without asking and claims it to be better even though you prefer the old one.

    Microsoft should be nailed by the balls to potty till they learn.

  36. Re:Sayonara, MSFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You just crossed the Red Line.

    Morons

    Don't sign your posts.

  37. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter. If people are being tricked into upgrading to something they haven't agreed to and/or do not want, then it's wrong.

  38. 3. Profit!! by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows 10 fits more criteria for "malware" than the most well-known malware suites do. Forcefully installs itself? Check. Spies on you? Check. Displays ads to you? Check. Uninstalls competitors' programs? Check. Doles out your security keys to people on your contact list? Check.

    It's one step away from literally being ransomware.

    I see someone has sneaked a peak at next years' business plan.

  39. We are Microsoft.... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 5, Funny

    We are upgrading your system...resistance is futile...

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  40. I agree with you 100%.... by gosand · · Score: 1

    Whoops sorry, I misread your comment... but you were close. FTFY

    If you move to Windows 10 then you deserve all the security problems you will inevitably have. GUI and "principle" issues aside - it is not a smart move.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  41. Re:Security by DaHat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft are deeply ashamed of all the Windows that came before 10 and would prefer everyone forget they ever existed.

    You assume that they are truly proud of what they have now. Windows 10 (especially on mobile) has been a cluster f. It shipped too early, unpolished and only barley tested (which isn't unexpected when you fire all of your testers the year before).

    I kind of feel for them.

    Pity them. Windows for desktops/laptops/devices is dying and they are desperate to make and/or keep it relevant.

    The only money making that happens wrt Windows today and likely in the future is as the backend of Azure... which does sort of make you wonder given their push to CoreCLR (ie not Windows centric), at what point they fire most of the devs behind Windows, put the business into sustained engineering mode and ride the wave until it finally ends (ala Radio Shack).

  42. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The sad part is that almost nobody from the "real world" knows this. Just the other day I was browsing the bogleheads.org forum (a popular investment forum where the typical member is well-educated and makes an upper-middle class salary or greater). There was a post about windows upgrading itself without permission, and half the replies amounted to "it can't hurt anything" and the other half "you need the latest and greatest anyway". They are utterly clueless about the spying, the tracking, the phoning home, and the fact that it amounts to malware.

  43. Re:Security by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft security support for Win7/8 for the next decade or so?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  44. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Define "consent" in the no-means-yes world of Windows 10

  45. Re:We are Microsoft."I resist" by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

    People used to laugh at me when I told them my Win 7 install is never connected to a network.

  46. Not misleading in the least by asvravi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look, there are a zillion things that MS did which are sneaky and downright reprehensible with regards to pushing Windows 10, but this is NOT one of them. Has anybody seen the actual dialog? It is NOT a question asking whether you want to upgrade. It is only a notification informing you that your PC is scheduled to upgrade since you have recommended updates turned on. Your PC would have updated to 10 in any case even if that dialog were not to popup, because 10 is a recommended upgrade. This notification is in reality offering you a chance to opt of it - I remember "click here if you want to change your update setting or cancel the upgrade" or something of that sort. Then an OK button. Clicking on "X" is not somehow "activating" an upgrade. It actually does nothing, as required of a notification dialog - it is just letting the already scheduled upgrade proceed, which is what one should expect.

    If anything is sneaky, it is TFA which portrays the dialog box in a false light. The entire media just repeats without once stopping to think - it has become fashionable in tech media to hit on MS pushing Win 10, but this kind of reporting only detracts from the credibility of reporting on all the real sneaky things that MS is doing.

    1. Re:Not misleading in the least by GreatOldOne · · Score: 1

      Actually, if what you are saying is true, I would expect to see only this window rather than the standard nagware windows I'm seeing. They snuck in that window on me one night, and after I cancelled it, the nagware left me alone for a couple of days. It's back now, and I kind of expect to see the nasty one back soon.

    2. Re:Not misleading in the least by cnaumann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The message used to say something like "Do you want to install Windows 10 now, or do you want to schedule your Windows 10 installation for later?" Clicking the X was the only way to say 'neither'. Now clicking the X says yeah, go ahead. You don't see this as sneaky in any way?

      Remember a month ago when people were saying that there was no way you could accidently consent to installing Windows 10?

      The only sane solution is to turn off all updates from Microsoft.

    3. Re:Not misleading in the least by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      No, recommended updates are a totally different option from the security updates.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    4. Re:Not misleading in the least by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      And it's still true. MS has been telling people for quite some time now that Windows 10 is a recommended update and you will get it if you *opt in* to recommended updates. There's no accident involved. I don't have recommended updates enabled and none of my Win 7 hosts are doing anything than putting a notification in the system tray that the upgrade is available. Now, if you have *opted in* to recommended updates, Microsoft will keep reminding you about it to try to avoid the "THEY FORCED ME TO UPGRADE" complaints. Seemingly a hopeless endeavor.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    5. Re:Not misleading in the least by ledow · · Score: 1

      I'm the fucking user.
      It's my fucking computer.
      When you upgrade my OS to a new major version, that may not work at all, that may not even boot and may then be unfixable (think Windows 8-based tablets, etc.), there are no amount of confirmation dialogs that are enough to get me to tell you that I WANT to install. Seriously, it should literally be a CAPTCHA of some kind for something like that.

      You shouldn't have to second-guess already-scheduled updates that you didn't authorise, that you can't back out of without answering SOMETHING (what if I'm in the middle of something when that pops up? Fuck off, Red Cross, and then it takes that as "continue unchanged"?).

      It's not medic overblown, it's Microsoft vastly overstepping the mark. Fuck, we complained about UAC and all that did was pop up a few times when programs were installing. This thing pops up once, then next reboot installs a whole new OS.

      I don't have Windows Updates turned on, never do, because of shite like that. In work, we WSUS so it's not an issue. But still, just from work colleagues, etc. thinking they HAVE to upgrade because of the way the dialog leads them down that garden path I have:

      - One user who wiped out all their documents, basically a factory restore to 10 (no, we're not sure how they managed that either)
      - One user who's perfectly-working computer then rebooted and crashed in explorer.exe every 10 seconds while they were in the middle of writing their Masters thesis (we found out purely by chance that getting a run dialog and quickly installing Classic Shell stopped the crashing enough to get into the OS to get files off it, because fuck all else worked).
      - One user who it upgraded and broke their main program because it wasn't 10 compatible, and now they can't go back (restore doesn't work and just reboots back into 10).
      - FIVE users who it upgrades, then the AMD display drivers go into a blue-screen loop even on safe mode and it's almost impossible to get back in without moving the drive to another machine, uninstalling the 10 AMD drivers and installing an old version from the AMD website, then putting it back.

      This is not the kind of shit you should be foisting on users without explicit consent because I guarantee there are more problems than that and people just rolled back and wasted several hours or don't have an IT team in work to take it to. You can't run a fucking ActiveX control without jumping through hoops nowadays but downloading 3.6Gb and then auto-installing a new OS is just fine? No.

      Roll on 10 being a paid update and then the worst they can do is nag you to pay for it.

    6. Re:Not misleading in the least by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Remember a month ago when people were saying that there was no way you could accidently consent to installing Windows 10?

      They're still here, still parroting that line, in this very discussion thread. It boggles the mind.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    7. Re:Not misleading in the least by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Clicking on "X" is not somehow "activating" an upgrade. It actually does nothing, as required of a notification dialog - it is just letting the already scheduled upgrade proceed, which is what one should expect.

      Yeah, but "clicking red x dismisses window" isn't nearly as good clickbait.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  47. Class action by wulfmans · · Score: 1

    I am ready to join the class action lawsuit as soon as an lawyer has enough guts to go after Microsoft.

  48. Gaming and Linux by pablo_max · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Disclaimer, I do use Windows 10 on my machines at home and especially my gaming rig.
    The laptops, because that was what came installed, but the gaming rig, obviously since it is actually pretty good for gaming.

    I do not really mind the OS itself, but I am growing tired of this constant crap they are pulling. Like forcing my to use Bing! I fucking hate Bing. If I accidentally search with Bing, I will go to google and search again even if the Bing answer may have been correct. I HATE Bing!

    I really hope that this year, with Vulcan coming online, my biggest reason for not switching to Linux will be gone. I can imagine that Steam can really help to push Linux on gaming with the HTC vive. I have ordered it myself.
    I'll need to update my graphics card, but I need to see what's on tap from AMD first.
    It could finally be time for the Linux desktop.

    1. Re:Gaming and Linux by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

      Depending on what you play, moving to Linux isn't as hard as it seems. 190 out of the 400 games I own work on Linux with minimal issues, some even run better with OpenGL than they did with DirectX.

      Granted, I don't play many AAA titles, but the ones I do, like Rogue Legacy and 7 Days to Die work great.

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
    2. Re:Gaming and Linux by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The default for data sharing with the mother ship cannot be changed in consumer versions. And eventually they will require you to connect to the mother ship on a regular basis just to revalidate the OS.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  49. Free Software Is Necessary by mx+b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is exactly why free software (in the vein of what Richard Stallman calls for) needs to be supported. *YOU*, the user, must own complete control over your computer and the software it runs, not developers (much of the more liberal open source licenses are about developer rights, not user rights -- big difference!) or corporations.

    I know many of you would object, "But I bought this computer, it's not Microsoft's!". Well I wholeheartedly agree, but the thing is, Windows being proprietary closed source means that Microsoft has a claim to intellectual property rights. Microsoft believes that you license Windows, not own it. Essentially, they still own the software on your computer. Again, I know that *you* disagree, but it kinda doesn't matter what you think -- Microsoft has money and lawyers and they push for the outcome they want. Which is to own your computer. And if they own it, they're technically allowed to do whatever they want with it, including force upgrades. That is the nature of licensing agreements -- you agree to their licensing rules, which means they can do whatever they want.

    If this bothers you, switch to a free software OS. Some flavor of Linux or even BSD. Get involved in the free software community, both the technical community (making more/better free software) and the political community (that lobbies for changes to copyright law, tries to get government to adopt open standards, etc.). We have to fight back, or you can expect more behavior like this from Microsoft, Apple, etc., in the future.

    1. Re:Free Software Is Necessary by Tharkkun · · Score: 2

      This is exactly why free software (in the vein of what Richard Stallman calls for) needs to be supported. *YOU*, the user, must own complete control over your computer and the software it runs, not developers (much of the more liberal open source licenses are about developer rights, not user rights -- big difference!) or corporations.

      I know many of you would object, "But I bought this computer, it's not Microsoft's!". Well I wholeheartedly agree, but the thing is, Windows being proprietary closed source means that Microsoft has a claim to intellectual property rights. Microsoft believes that you license Windows, not own it. Essentially, they still own the software on your computer. Again, I know that *you* disagree, but it kinda doesn't matter what you think -- Microsoft has money and lawyers and they push for the outcome they want. Which is to own your computer. And if they own it, they're technically allowed to do whatever they want with it, including force upgrades. That is the nature of licensing agreements -- you agree to their licensing rules, which means they can do whatever they want.

      If this bothers you, switch to a free software OS. Some flavor of Linux or even BSD. Get involved in the free software community, both the technical community (making more/better free software) and the political community (that lobbies for changes to copyright law, tries to get government to adopt open standards, etc.). We have to fight back, or you can expect more behavior like this from Microsoft, Apple, etc., in the future.

      As a end user I do have complete control whether Windows 10 upgrades my system. It's a simple option called let me know when Windows updates are available instead of Automatically install. Please don't confuse ignorance with the lack of choice.

    2. Re:Free Software Is Necessary by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      As a end user I do have complete control whether Windows 10 upgrades my system. It's a simple option called let me know when Windows updates are available instead of Automatically install. Please don't confuse ignorance with the lack of choice.

      That "complete control" is not as complete as you thing. It would be simple for MS to push an update that has a description that it fixes a root privilege flaw in IE and you would install that. But it would instead download and install Win 10 without you knowing. That is not complete control, that is merely the illusion of control. They probably could even start the install without your interaction if they really wanted to. I'm sure they have some sort of backdoor they could use.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  50. Re:Security by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh the security keys again? Look, it's this simple, if you can be bothered to actually know what you are complaining about, just shut the fuck up about it. Windows 10, a no point, gave your security keys away. It at no point gave your contact list your wifi passwords without your consent. The system was turned on, yes, to allow you to choose to use it. It never, ever, gave your keys unless you specifically told it to do so. As well, it never actually exposed your key, just a hash. But like I said, if you are still whining about that, you are an idiot

  51. Re:Sayonara, MSFT by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    Let me guess: you're also moving to Canada if the wrong person gets elected in November. Really, you swear you'll do it. That's how totally serial you are.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  52. Re:Security by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    I hope you posted in the thread to inform them, then!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  53. Re:Security by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    The sad part is you are somewhat right about security issues. 7 wont be getting security updates at some point

    However, its no panacea and its offensive as fuck. Ads? Even when privacy settings are enabled, its still talking to bing like crazy. As far as I can tell, the only way to be even a little bit private with your windows usage is to block bing at your border routers.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  54. Re:Security by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I had trouble on my old desktop. When I installed Win10 on it, it worked for awhile, but then an update fsked my internet access. I ended up installing Ubuntu on it.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  55. Never10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Check out Never10, a free, nifty little utility from GRC to make sure your Windows box's settings are such that 10 won't be installed:

    https://www.grc.com/never10.htm

    Handy!

  56. Re:Security by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    and reinstalling Windows 7

    Why not try a linux distro?

  57. Re:Security by taustin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Until literally this week, there were no hardware drivers available for our receipt printers. Without GWX Control Panel, an automatic Windows 10 upgrade would literally put us out of business. Is that a good enough reason for you? Probably not.

  58. Re:Security by taustin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's one step away from literally being ransomware.

    That comes in July, when it stops being free, but doesn't stop being an automatic install.

    "You're copy of windows is unlicensed. Pay us $100+ or you will never see your own data again."

    I wish I thought this was an exaggeration, but frankly, I expect exactly that.

    Microsoft should be prosecuted for racketeering for how they've handled Windows 10.

  59. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uhh, Windows 10 is less secure than Windows 7 and Windows 8.

  60. Re: Security by taustin · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. How hard it is to understand that I bought Windows 7 and that's exactly what I was delivered. If I need 10, I would have upgraded already.

    When they released Windows 7, they published a life cycle that said they would provide security updates until 2020. That's an implicit contract that it be usable until 2020. Now they're trying to cheat their customers out of four years of use.

    Fraud is a predicate offense for racketeering. And racketeering lawsuits can be brought privately. Is there a Kickstarter for legal fees?

  61. Re: Security by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Are you renting/leasing this car?

  62. Are updates worth it anymore? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Lets stipulate you don't expose any ports to Microsoft listeners (RDP, IIS, SMB..etc), don't use Microsoft browsers and don't have to worry about multiple user accounts any thoughts on wholesale firewalling the entire Microsoft domain and be done with it?

    In the past there have been defects in IP stack, font rendering and various things that could bleed thru and affect someone simply running software or browsing the web but I flat out don't trust Microsoft to even behave rationally anymore and I'm losing confidence even "critical" security updates are worth it until we switch to Linux.

    1. Re:Are updates worth it anymore? by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

      My computers run Linux. Some also dual-boot to Windows 7 out of necessity, in which case I install an ISO with SP1 and disable the Windows Update service before configuring the network.

      Of course I can't recommend others do the same, but it works a charm for me.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  63. Canadian's Report this Under CASL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you are a Canadian, I would invite you to report this as a violation of Canada's Anti-Spam legislation that also now covers unauthorized installation of software. Hopefully, having enough Canadians reporting this issue will cause the government to take action against Microsoft. Microsoft should not be permitted to "trick" users into installing software - this is not consent.
    Report here:
    http://fightspam.gc.ca/eic/site/030.nsf/frm-eng/MMCN-9EZV6S

  64. OK by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Enjoy winning your lawsuit in a decade and getting a coupon for $10 off Office 2026.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:OK by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Enjoy winning your lawsuit in a decade and getting a coupon for $10 off Office 2026.

      When it comes to a class-action, I think everyone knows at this point that the only true reward for the victims these days is setting legal precedent.

      That doesn't dismiss the justification, nor should it.

  65. Re:Darwin was right by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    it's just another evidence, some would say...

  66. Re:Security by iampiti · · Score: 1

    No, the real sad part is that most people that know all of that don't care. They'll say they've nothing to hide or that Android also spies on you (that one is true but that's no reason to also have this crap on Windows).

  67. In the words of Steve Jobs by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    You're dismissing the box wrong

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  68. Internet Popup Malware by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    This is as bad as those internet popups that nag you about leaving the website when you close a page, then install malware no matter what button you click.

    I never click on those popups. When I get these anymore I pull the plug on the internet, use System Monitor (I'm on a Mac) to force the browser to close (bypasses the popup), re-open the browser and close ALL pages except for a blank page (check for pop-unders!), close the browser, THEN it is safe to re-connect the internet and open the browser.

    I don't regret my move to Mac one bit after seeing Microsoft go this low. Way to lose customers to Apple, Microsoft! What's next, a Sony-style rootkit on music CDs?

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:Internet Popup Malware by ewhac · · Score: 1
      Aqua Teen Hunger Force made an episode about that: https://youtu.be/ENeJYBnP5gg

      "Damn! You need to watch what you agree to, 'cause that one almost took my head off!"

  69. Re:Security by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    But Microsoft says it's ok, and we all love Microsoft here, right?

  70. Always verify... by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

    This is why my gaming Windows 8.1 PC is set up to check for updates but not to download anything automatically. I can then examine the KB for each download and then block/hide the undesirable updates.

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  71. Re:Security by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    They tested with barley, or were they imbibing barley while testing?

  72. Likelihood of a totally forced upgrade? by swb · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the chances are that Microsoft will invoke a totally forced upgrade for:

    (a) ...all Windows 7 PCs, regardless of GWX registry settings or install type (home/pro/enterprise)

    (b) ...all Windows 7 PCs missing GWX registry?

    (c) ...all Windows 7 Home and Pro editions with/without GWX registry?

    I guess at this point I can see them pulling the pin on it and just not giving a shit as many customers have no choice but to keep running Windows, and while for some it may totally break their software, for possibly many others it will just piss them off and they will keep working but MS will have "won" having upgraded them off 7..

  73. Re:Security by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    The thing is, their core bread and butter is the corporare office, not the home users. And yet they are completely alienating the corporate world, the developer world, and any professional who uses Windows. The only traction they get in the corporate world is because of brainwashed IT staff who take orders from Redmond. They really can't be so stupid that they would shoot their golden goose, and yet it seems they have.

    I can't imagine what internal developers at Microsoft are thinking, they're probably in a state of depression or trying to make their resumes look good without having the word "Microsoft" appear.

  74. Re:Security by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    But what's worse? Ransomeware trojan from visiting an unsecure site, or ransomeware Windows 10?

  75. Re:Sayonara, MSFT by blackomegax · · Score: 1

    That burn was so sick, it infected the world and ports were closed off.

  76. Re: Security by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Hi, we replaced your car with a Yugo while it was in the shop. This should provide you with a better driving experience. After all you're going to have to upgrade eventually, so we made it easy for you.

  77. Re:FUCK YOU MICROSOFT ! by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    They're in their 70s

    What they use besides a browser? https://linuxmint.com/ isn't sufficient?

  78. This happened to me by GreatOldOne · · Score: 1

    I wondered why I saw a message congratulating me on scheduling my Windows 10 "upgrade". I found the cancel link, but I think I had to acknowledge at least twice that I didn't want their malwar....er...upgrade. Apparently, this is an indication that Microsoft knows that Windows 10 is about as popular as Kim Jong Un, that is, you must be forced to take it.

  79. Re:Yet you idiots keep buying from them by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    enterprise environments doesn't allow it, easily and painless (moving from MS-Windows in big companies can take years, and only works if it was very well sponsored and planed [if not, a "natural" contra-movement awakes...] - even on universities it's not easy, besides the general cultural-change acceptant environment...)

  80. You have to be shitting me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really?
    1) This wasn't an operating system update, this was an upgrade. This means a whole new operating system, not just adjustments.
    2) The reasons why I didn't want to upgrade yet
    a) Some of my wife's old programs wouldn't (and didn't work) on Win10 and I wanted to see about an upgrade path for that software BEFORE Microsoft forced it on me. This is absolutely despicable.
    b) I have all kinds of ad blockers to avoid the problems they can present, but now Microsoft bypasses all of that in the OS? Fuck MS
    3) The previous 100 dialogs presented were "opt in". This particular dialog switched to "opt out". Furthermore, the dialog layout makes you have to deliberately go through the whole dialog and see the right link and it's not obvious at all visually which link to choose from immediately. By my UI standards, they deliberately chose to do this to trick people who use muscle memory to just click the "X" and not realize they were implicitly agreeing to this.
    4) You really think bundling constant ads for a full upgrade with critical software updates for security protection is a good thing???? Fuck MS.

    So Microsoft knew exactly what they were doing and it's obvious they were tricking customers who do not pour through each dialog constantly crammed in their face into upgrading against their will.

    So fuck you if you think this is an OK practice. You're probably the middle manager in Microsoft who thought this despicable practice was OK to do.

    So I'm going to reinstall a previous Windows OS in a virtual environment and turn off the updates. Fuck all of you as I do not give a shit if I get that OS "owned". It doesn't matter, Microsoft is now doing the owning anyways.

  81. Re:Security by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    What's more secure about windows 10? They said this about win2k,xp,vista,7,8, and 8.1

  82. Bing! by GreatOldOne · · Score: 1

    I think Bing is appropriately named, if it is named after that useless machine in the beginning of Monty Python's "The Meaning of Life".

    1. Re: Bing! by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the scene where a women wants to find something within herself and the search engine bends over her and tells her not to do anything because she's not qualified?

  83. Re:Security by chr1st1anSoldier · · Score: 1

    Honestly, Microsoft doesn't seem that far from being the next cryptolocker. Microsoft has been hinting at a subscription based model ever since Windows 8 came out, if they happen to move to that and you don't pay for a few months, what happens? It seems very easy to lock you out and force you to pay what you own to get back into your system.

  84. Re:Shit like this by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    I did the same thing to goggle after being forced to learn a new ui switching to ddg and firefox It was only painful for a few days, but I got used to it.

    I don't mind learning new stuff, in fact I like it, but it does suck up brain energy that I'd rather spend learning something useful rather than relearning something that I already knew. If in two years, people are raving about how much more productive they are then I'll look into it.

  85. Re:No no no this can't be happening! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Had my brother claim Windows would never do this, and he's a Microsoft hater. The knee jerk reaction is just to blame the user (must have clicked somewhere accidentally), because it's unthinkable that a major corporation would release the poison voluntarily.

  86. Re:The best thing Microsoft could do for home user by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    or not buy nothing, and just try a linux distro again

  87. Re:Security by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Since they don't' mind that Google and Apple do it, there's no point in telling them MS wants to do it also.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  88. Re:The best thing Microsoft could do for home user by sinequonon · · Score: 1

    Yes, I reached that conclusion today; my next laptop will not be a Windows OS system. The only thing I need Windows for now is to run PC games.

    --
    -Bob-
  89. Re:Blue screen of death by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

    I don't suppose her computer has an Asus motherboard?

    There was a recent Windows 7 update that disables secure boot. Asus motherboards have secure boot enabled by default.

    This results in a non-bootable computer and could seem like data loss.

    Might be something to check into anyway.

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  90. Re:Security by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. We do all love Microsoft.

    Who could have known that CUA dictates that a red X means Accept. But now that we have been enlightened, it is hard to deny the brilliance? I imagine that shortly red Xs will be popping up everywhere.

    Yes. We all love Microsoft. And we have always been at war with EastAsia.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  91. Re:Security by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

    That isn't sad, that is reality. Most people do not share your concerns.

    Most of the people posting in this thread are stuck in a echo chamber, unable to see anything else.

    So MS knows my web history and my search history. So what, so does Google!

    If you are afraid of information getting out, perhaps the Internet isn't for you. Your illusions of privacy online are over inflated.

  92. Re:Security by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    Forget what?

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  93. Re:Security by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    Next step is to prevent any sort of backup unless and until your subscription is up to date. You can continue to run (for a while). You just can't archive data until you pay.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  94. Re:Security by jaymemaurice · · Score: 2

    Since the Windows Drive Model hardly changed between Windows versions I've not found a driver that existed in Windows 7/8 that didn't currently work in 10. I even got the serial port connected touchscreen in my vista era General Dynamics notebook working on Windows 10.
    Sometime an MSI installer would check the Windows version (fix with Orca) or need to be run in "Compatibility Mode" - but I have all sorts of long unsupported hardware running in Windows 10.

    The real kick will be when an automatic Windows update screws everything up and Microsoft says "Not our fault" - but I anticipate this will be a crap-shoot with both supported and unsupported apps and hardware the same... the difference being that the "supported" hardware may become unsupported or possibly get a fix after the impact has already been noted.

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  95. Re:Another Nasty Surprise: Flash installed by defa by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    Let me guess, you can't uninstall those things, despite the EU ruling that doing that with Internet Explorer was illegal...

  96. Re:Security by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    I get you are joking, but here's a serious answer anyway:
    Windows is a decent operating systems at its core these days, and Windows 7 even had a decent GUI. The only problem is that Microsoft can't leave a good thing alone if it does not make them money. If necessary, they will introduce new "features" that serve them more than their users. So far we had
          -the attempt to push a tablet and phone GUI on the desktop user (Windows 8). Presumably to train the user to accept Windows Phone.
          -and recently, increasingly shameless data collection from personal data. My best guess why is monetizing the user's private life by selling personalized ads.

    IMHO we are at the point where Microsoft's shenanigans are diminishing the worth of Windows to the user.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  97. Re:Security by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    You assume that they are truly proud of what they have now. Windows 10 (especially on mobile) has been a cluster f. It shipped too early, unpolished and only barley tested (which isn't unexpected when you fire all of your testers the year before).

    You assume they're not? I don't know how you can't fuck something up that gloriously with the entire world telling you not to, unless you're doing it on purpose and for a reason.

  98. Re:Security by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

    Sorry I might be mistaken, but doesn't the key need to be shared to the contact in order for the contact to actually use the Wifi, not just a hash of the key. The hash of the key would be useless for authenticating on the network unless the hash itself was the passkey.

    The actual access device could store a hash of the key to validate if the provided key is valid instead of storing the key, but if it is checking the provided key matched the hash exactly without actually hashing it, the hash is now the key...

    If it is able to share a key, it must be stored in reversible encryption. There are tools for Windows (and pretty much every other operating system) to recover the saved keys. I think the only thing that makes Windows 10 unique is that it saves these keys "in the cloud" and allows you to share them across systems. Sort of like Google Chrome saved passwords.

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  99. Re:Security by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Actually clicking it doesn't accept. The "x" just gets rid of the window. The upgrade is already pre-accepted and scheduled and the user has to take positive action to undo the scheduled upgrade. What's wong is that the "Accept" button at the bottom doesn't do anything really, it just closes the windows the same as the "x" does. They're fooling the user into thinking that by not clicking "Accept" that the upgrade is not yet accepted.

  100. "Encourging" Upgrade by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    No, Microsoft deceived its users.

    And the U.S. Federal Trade Commission again does nothing, but keeps signing the our cheque nether the less.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  101. Don't like it? Tough shit! by rcase5 · · Score: 1

    Ultimately, Microsoft will be able to get away with this, and there isn't thing one anybody can do about it. I'm sure this type of thing is covered under their EULA (yes, even the Win7/8.x EULAs), and they're response will be something like "Don't like it? Don't use Windows".

    And the tragedy of all of this is most people will just go along with this and accept it. I've said for a long time that most people use Windows because they don't know any better. I often get a lot of flack for saying that, even on tech boards like this one. But anybody who is seriously surprised by Microsoft's actions with regard to Windows 10 has not been paying attention. Microsoft has been aiming for this scenario for decades, and what they are doing now is a Bill Gates/Steve Balmer/Satya Nadella wet dream! Most people will have to go along with it because so many custom or specialty apps are built for Windows. Those who are motivated might port their apps over to MacOS or Linux, but it will be a long time (a year, maybe two) before such apps would be available to end-users. In the meantime, Microsoft will be able to run roughshod over their entire user base and flip them off in the process.

    I stopped using Windows as my main operating system in 1998, and I'm SO glad I did! I'm not touching Windows 10 with a 10-mile pole!

  102. Re:Security by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

    I think Microsoft will realize their subscription Windows dreams with Office 365 providing cross platform "Windows" as a service. Where "Windows" is the application user experience, not the drivers, kernel, codecs, etc. that only make them money from new PC sales anyway.

    If the Windows Store and Apps take off, I guarantee that it will become a cross-platform subscription. You will bring your own hardware/hyper-visor/operating system/etc and install "Windows Services" or interact with them "in the cloud"

    I tried to switch to Linux on my work laptop but I kept encountering office documents from with OLE embedded files, power point presentations which still didn't display correctly in Libre Office despite pirating all the Microsoft fonts etc.

    I'm back to running Windows because it's cheaper and more tolerable than paying for an Office 365 subscription and there is no viable office suite for Linux

    as always s/in the cloud/on someone else\'s computer/g

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  103. Re:Security by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    I recommend using https://www.libreoffice.org/ in MS-Windows, having MS-Office used only as fallback: this way you can gradually identify and fix the problematic documents (please, try to use ODF whenever possible =])

  104. Re:Another Nasty Surprise: Flash installed by defa by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    Over the weekend I set up a new Win 10 machine for Dad (store bought HP Envy). Going through updates and installs I found one nasty surprise, Flash was installed by default on this box. I was hoping to wean him over to HTML5 with this upgrade (from Vista !), but HP builds them with Flash already in place. Went ahead and made Firefox64 the default browser, and Chrome as an alternative, but since Cortana and all MS services default to MS Edge no matter what you set, it's going to be a mixed operation from now on

    You set it in control panel now. Setting it to default in the browser itself will not work.

  105. It's the new business model by DidgetMaster · · Score: 2

    Everyone is doing it. 1) Turn on something by default. 2) Make you have to jump through a bunch of hoops in order to opt out or turn it off. 3) Charge you a lot of money if you fail to do so. My phone company does it. My satellite company does it. My credit card company does it......

  106. This demands legal action by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Microsoft have been wantonly abusing their customers with these non-consentual updates to Windows 10. This should not stand. There needs to be strong legal action against this sort of thing. Let's start by calling it what it is: #WindowsUpdateRape.

    I didn't consent to the upgrade, I repeatedly said no, Microsoft repeatedly re-pushed the same upgrader and nagware to my machine. The best way to describe this behavior is "update rape".

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  107. Re:Blue screen of death by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Get it fixed professionally and send MS the bill - it was upgraded at their request.

    BTW: good luck at getting any money, they will spend more on lawyers fighting you than the value of the bill, the last thing that they want is to admit/accept any liability for their actions.

  108. losing the plot by sjwest · · Score: 1

    I recently had the job of restoring a vista pc who's wga key (label on the pc) became invalid three years ago, and was finally infected by a bitcoin ransom ware file locker. Nobody wanted to help.with the wga thing, the ransomware reminded me of sony corporation

    It now has a copy of linux on it and the files where backed up - it seems to suit the user.and the hardware still works

    I would love to know why the wga key became invalid and being that i am not sure i could convince anybody to part with cash for a microsoft product and discover that they dont really own it.

    I hope many people do what i did by looking at alternative solutions

  109. Re:Another Nasty Surprise: Flash installed by defa by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure you can uninstall Flash if you want. Pretty sure Firefox also lets you disassociate Flash from the file extension as well.

    Not sure if Flashblock is still a viable extension in Firefox, though. ... mostly because I pretty much extirpated Flash from my (Vista) system.

    Hey, don't laugh at me. It still plays Civ IV, so I still don't have any free time...

  110. ewhac Predicts! by ewhac · · Score: 1

    My friends: So convinced am I of Microsoft's perfidy that, some time in the next 6-24 months, Microsoft will attempt to revoke the Secure Boot keys for Windows 7 and 8, and every machine with a UEFI BIOS still running 7 and 8 will refuse to boot. The government will do nothing. The industry press, though publicly wringing its hands in consternation, will do nothing. The only proffered "fix" will be a Windows 10 install.

    "Can you prove it won't happen?"

    1. Re:ewhac Predicts! by ewhac · · Score: 1
      According to my readings, it can be done, and it doesn't necessarily involve the use of revocation lists; you simply delete the key/cert that authenticates Windows from the DB. You can modify the DB/DBX key store at run time all you want, provided your mods can be authenticated with one of the Key Exchange Keys. Microsoft's key is pre-loaded on to every PC out there, so they could trivially modify the DB and DBX stores to remove the entries for Win 7 and 8.

      Even if they can't directly modify the DB/DBX directly from Windows, they could easily drop a new executable in the UEFI boot sequence -- authenticated by their Secure Boot cert -- which would do it for them.

      So, yes, based on those readings, I regard this as technically feasible.

    2. Re:ewhac Predicts! by ewhac · · Score: 1

      ...you can boot/install windows in legacy bios mode which doesn't require those fancy keys.

      Not with a GUID partition table (GPT), you can't; legacy BIOS only understands MBR. And GPT is the default partition table format you get when installing Win7 and 8.

  111. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then you should have better control over your computers.

    I think a whole lot of people agree on this point. We, the people who OWN the computers, should have much better control over them. Such as being able to say NO to an upgrade, and have that preference stick, and not be surreptitiously reset or otherwise bypassed AGAINST OUR WILL.

  112. Re:Security by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 fits more criteria for "malware" than the most well-known malware suites do. Forcefully installs itself? Check. Spies on you? Check. Displays ads to you? Check. Uninstalls competitors' programs? Check. Doles out your security keys to people on your contact list? Check.

    It's one step away from literally being ransomware.

    I consider it ransomware, more so when the computer is locked to that OS and it can't be changed.

    I know dual boot Linux, explain that to my Mom.

  113. Re:Another Nasty Surprise: Flash installed by defa by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    I had no difficulty setting chrome as the default browser on my personal box and any searches I do I do from the address/search bar in the browser so I don't think Cortana is picking that up

  114. Red cross? by Briareos · · Score: 1

    Must be sponsored by Upgrades Sans Frontières...

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  115. Re:Security by taustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand it perfectly. That's why I know what a sleazy bunch of malware distributors Microsoft has become.

    We have little choice on software that we use for point of sale. What we use is the only system that interacts with the national franchise, so if we don't use it, 300+ employees are out of a job. We don't write hardware driver for printers, and we don't write the software that interacts with those drivers. We can't. No retailer our size can. The resources simply aren't there. If you believe otherwise, you have no idea what you're jabbering about.

    The only alternative to keeping a close watch at Microsoft's malware attempts is to go out of business. We finally have the option of moving to Windows 10, but I'm still not convinced it's possible to turn off enough telemetrics to be PCI compliant. It's entirely possible that we cannot continue to use Microsoft products without committing fraud against our merchant service. That not only has Microsoft resorted to being a criminal enterprise, they're going to force their customers to do so as well.

    Thanks. Microsoft.

  116. Re:Security by taustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since the Windows Drive Model hardly changed between Windows versions I've not found a driver that existed in Windows 7/8 that didn't currently work in 10.

    You've apparently never worked with Epson receipt printers. When I tried the Win 7 drivers on Win 8, it blue screened so hard the blue screen crashed. That's 7 to 8, not 7 to 10. Our receipt printers would cost at least $100k to replace, and until two days day, our point of sale vendor (they have the only software that works correctly with the national franchise) did not sell a printer that had working Windows 8 drivers. Yes, they are very slow updating stuff; they test thoroughly, and yes, they suck in many ways, but it would cost us seven figures to replace them, and nothing we could build ourselves would actually work.

    Microsoft knows there are millions of computers out there that cannot be upgraded without destroying the ability to perform the work they were bought to perform. And they don't care.

    And that's fraudulent.

  117. Re:Security by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    Microsoft should be prosecuted for racketeering for how they've handled Windows 10.

    i disagree! they should be commended for their efforts to spread Linux! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  118. Problem Solved! by Nexion · · Score: 1

    http://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/imac

    At least that is how I took care of my Windows 10 issue. Now my OS is version ten and actually doesn't suck.

  119. Re:Security by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

    They must be taking lessons from Bill Cosby!

    Try the veal folks, I'll be here all week!

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  120. Re: Security by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Then employ someone that knows how to use Windows properly. If I can do it, you have no excuse.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  121. That's it, Microsoft. You need help. by Indigo · · Score: 1

    Your codependency has gotten completely out of hand.

  122. Re:Security by srmalloy · · Score: 1

    It's one step away from literally being ransomware.

    That comes in July, when it stops being free, but doesn't stop being an automatic install.

    "You're copy of windows is unlicensed. Pay us $100+ or you will never see your own data again."

    I wish I thought this was an exaggeration, but frankly, I expect exactly that.

    Microsoft should be prosecuted for racketeering for how they've handled Windows 10.

    If Microsoft continued to try to force an upgrade to Windows 10 down our throats with tricks like these after it was no longer a free upgrade, I'd be willing to bet that you could make a solid case that, under 39 U.S. Code 3009, it meets the definition of "unordered merchandise" and Microsoft has just given it to you for free, and can be required to cough up a valid license for it. I'd also be willing to bet that Microsoft isn't willing to have that premise tested in court, and that all the "Get Windows X" code will receive an update well in advance of the drop date that will cause them, on or after the expiration of the free-upgrade period, to require payment in advance before it will even download the update.

  123. Re: Security by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    My backup image restorations always work perfectly, why?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  124. this isn't jumping the shark by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    that implies merely extreme lameness, not menacing danger.

    the correct metaphor is that MS are getting desperate and violent in their attempt to get a little kid to come and get some of the sweets they have in the back of their van.

  125. Violates... by meerling · · Score: 1

    I do believe that violates Microsoft Certification of Software. Which is Hilarious!

  126. Re:Security by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

    No, the problem is you, not MS.

    If you had security updates installing but recommended updates turned off, this would not happen.

    The problem is people not understanding and being proactive about their computers.

  127. Re: Security by jep77 · · Score: 1

    If your enterprise is large enough to have $100k in printers and you're dealing with unwanted Windows 10 updates, you're doing in wrong.

  128. Re:Security by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when all businesses think they can do without IT, or even worse, outsource it to India.

    Hire an IT guy. Hire one local to you. Your technology experience will improve.

  129. haven't seen this since disabling updates by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    in fact, I haven't updated any of my windows machines past 7SP1. First thing I do on a fresh install: turn automatic updates off. GWX PROBLEM SOLVED!

    Funny story: I had a letter through from my internet carrier recently saying that one or more of the computers in my home have become infected with Conficker. Now this is weird, since last I checked Conficker was a Windows worm, and being as all my Windows boxen are airgapped and have no network access beyond temporary LAN connection for pulling from the local repository, the only systems I have which are connected to my broadband are Linux machines and well, I don't know if/how Conficker runs on Linux. Anyone? Or is Virgin Media just trying to sell me some overpriced, overstuffed and subutility Windows antivirus package that a: I don't really need and b: I can't use on my networked systems anyway?

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  130. Re:Blue screen of death by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    I don't think they can legally force you to accept their disclaimer of liability for something they force on you. I'll have to check that, but I'm sure a coercive contract is ab initio null and void in its entirety.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  131. Re: Security by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    any civil lawsuit can be brought privately (and most still are); lately it's been made difficult with the introduction of obscene fee structure in England which basically prices most people right out of obtaining an equitable solution to a conflict. Criminal prosecutions don't/shouldn't cost anything to file.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  132. Re:Security by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    KATE and a LAMP stack, what more could you possibly need??

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  133. It's annoying. by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    I'm one of the few who actually likes Windows 10, but this thing, which I just experienced first hand today on a Windows 7 machine is over the line for obnoxious. Geeze, let people stay on older versions if they want to. This is too much shoving it down people's throats. All the nagging really needs to go away now. People who are interested in upgrading have probably already done so, this is just pissing people off now. I like Windows 10 and this level of shoving is pissing me off. Stop now.

  134. Re:Security by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

    Amen... If you use technology in your business, then to some extent, you're IN the tech business, at least in so far as needing someone competent to manage it.

    If a random employee sets up your computers, or the boss does it between meetings, and then something goes wrong and your first response is to swear at the computer or Microsoft, then you're doing it wrong.

  135. Avoid Wine, try online tax, shell is powerful by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I thought I'd throw in a few thoughts for people transitioning away from Windows.

    Wine, a program that runs Windows software on Linux, might look attractive at first. Most of the time, it works better to run Linux / open software on Linux. You'll probably end up happier if you consider Wine as last resort, when you really want a specific brand of software (game?) that's Windows-only. How often did you use a Linux emulator to run Linux software on Windows? Examples - use Chrome or Firefox, rather than trying to run IE under Wine. Use LibreOffice/OpenOffice rather than Microsoft Office. For most people, Gimp will be better than Photoshop under Wine (graphics professionals will mostly be using Macs).

    For taxes, that's something you do once per year. Good tax software is available under Linux, for countries other than the US. For US taxes, why screw around installing different different things trying to find something that runs well locally when the providers are all focusing on their online services. Ibuse Taxact.com. Better to have my taxes done in a few hours than to spend a few hours each year screwing around with different software.

    The real power of Linux, the biggest advantage over Windows, is at the command line. Once you get used to using your main applications in GUI, experiment and learn a bit of the command line. It can save you many hours of tedious clicking.

    If you really get stuck, the very same programmers who wrote Linux and created all of the open source software are here to help you! You wouldn't ever imagine that you could email Microsoft and the lead programmer for MS Office would personally answer your question, but that's exactly what happens with Linux, if you have a good question. Eric S. Raymond wrote a somewhat tongue-in-cheek but very useful guide to getting help called How To Ask Questions the Smart Way. Yes, you should use Google first (include the word "howto" in your searches) and maybe even read the directions. If you do your part and can't find an answer, though, you may well get an answer from Linus, or Ted Tso for filesystem issues, from Daniel J Bernstein for qmail his other software, from me for storage and Perl stuff, etc.

    1. Re:Avoid Wine, try online tax, shell is powerful by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Wine, a program that runs Windows software on Linux, might look attractive at first.

      I actually consider WINE to be a killer app. When it works, it literally feels like magic. Seeing that little xfce window border around a Windows program gives me a serious nerdon. The WINE devs are like, "Oh, you didn't think to support a good OS? Ok, fine entire rest of the world, we'll just have to support YOU!".

      Specifically, I use it for a few games- Star Wars: The Old Republic, almost the entire Blizzard catalog (but Overwatch looks like a no-go), and I can even get Wildstar running, though the framerate is rough because my CPU is a little old (WINE has to do translation from the windows directwhatever stuff, and that chews CPU- the GPU is more than fine).

      It is, of course, totally unfair that Linux is ever held to the standard of "can run programs written for another OS". The fact that it runs every game I care about at full speed is frankly ludicrous.

      > How often did you use a Linux emulator to run Linux software on Windows?

      I think we all know that Windows supports other things for shit. But in practice, a Windows user who needs a specific Linux thing will run a Linux VM. Because Linux tries real hard to work under all circumstances, this almost always works. The things that a VM wouldn't be great at, such as games, usually have a Windows version of them available too. Personally, I'd much rather have an OS I trust and jump through some hoops sometimes. I think there will be less Windows "must-have" programs in the future anyway- programs that you end up being forced into using for some social reason, and that only support the shittiest OS around.

      > For taxes, that's something you do once per year.

      Yea, and I'm not sweating it for now. I'm sure I'll have an answer. I'll either be able to make it work in WINE, or I'll have a VM, or I could even just grab a cheap used Mac off ebay. That also helps my use case because then it would solve itunes immediately too. I want to store my tax data locally if possible anyway.

      > The real power of Linux, the biggest advantage over Windows, is at the command line.

      I mean, I can see that. But there's a bunch of selling points: much more trustworthy software, often possible to script your solutions instead of giving up or needing a binary solution, vastly more configurable at every level, and way easier access to development tools in general. When there's a problem, it is always nice knowing that there is a solution for it, somewhere, somehow, waiting to be discovered.

  136. Re:Another Nasty Surprise: Flash installed by defa by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    since Cortana and all MS services default to MS Edge no matter what you set, it's going to be a mixed operation from now on

    You set it in control panel now.

    I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid you can't do that. (Maybe it works in non-Cortana "MS Services", whatever those might be)

    I declined to enable Cortana on my laptop during the upgrade. We'll see how long before I start getting popup windows insisting I turn it on (with options for [Enable] [Activate] [Turn On] and an [x] button in the corner that automatically agrees to Cortana's EULA)

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  137. Re:Blue screen of death by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Or you can buy a USB-capable external drive enclosure. (The OP obviously has another, working computer to hand.) They're about 6 bucks at Radio Shack.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  138. Get the Greek version by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

    Click the X and you get 10. Sweet!

    --
    Get your dogma outta my yard!
  139. Re: Security by taustin · · Score: 1

    The only option you offer is, literally, to go out of business and put 300 people out of work. I'm not the one who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. If you work in IT, which I don't believe you do, you are incompetent, stupid, and malicious. Do you work for Microsoft's malware department?

  140. Re: Security by taustin · · Score: 1

    You clearly have no idea how much point of sale equipment costs. It's not that many printers or systems.

    And I don't take advice form clueless morons, or people who promote malware.

  141. It makes me wonder by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    If this will be referred to as Windowsgate.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  142. Re:Security by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

    Just one? Seeing ads on startup and being forced to share more and more information are too high a price for a "free" upgrade.

    That's two.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  143. Re: Security by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Someday, I hope a heart surgeon says this same exact thing to you.

    He won't, because I'll be paying him for his services.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  144. Re: Security by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the primary reason people say that Linux isn't for the masses?

    It's what people say, but in reality, I think the issue is that usually by the point this becomes an option, they've already got people that are experienced with Windows and such, the issue being, everyone has to be retrained etc.

    If what you're saying is true then there is no reason to use windows in business, right?

    The biggest problem with Microsoft products, is that to use one effectively, you need another... Like, you have Microsoft Office, but document sharing and management needs Sharepoint, then you need active directory for Sharepoint to work, then you need single sign on for that to work transparently, then you need Exchange for Sharepoint to work properly with e-mail and Outlook, then you need better tools for managing your infrastructure like SCCM etc. You won't see top-down application-service integration like this on Linux to this extent outside of certain proprietary enterprise solutions from SuSE Linux etc.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  145. Re:Free Upgrade by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    "Freemium" The mium is Latin for 'not really'

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  146. Re:Security by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    And? If you distrust your OS vendor so much that you have to block their search servers at your router, maybe you are in a losing battle and its time to switch battlefields. I am seriously thinking of going back to single booting linux instead.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  147. Re:Security by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Why would you opt in to recommended updates on a business critical machine?

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  148. Re:Security by JustBoo · · Score: 1

    I could give you many reasons for why you are wrong, but it's simpler to tell a troll like you to go f*ck yourself.

    just start with one.

    You are too stupid to start a simple sentence correctly. And there you have it.

  149. Re taxes by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I realized that what I wrote about taxes wasn't exactly clear. For my business taxes, there is bookeeping data that drives the income and expense figures. I do my bookeeping in Gnucash. The taxes themselves are just a collection of forms, no real "data". For a form wizard to fill in the forms, I use Taxact.com, then save the output locally.

    It's cheaper amd faster to use an online tax service than to set up a Windows VM and buy Windows tax software. Obviously that's personal preference, but consider the online option, saving the output locally when you're done. The online versions are better anyway because that's where companies are putting their development efforts.

  150. Re:Security by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    are you saying that every computer owner needs to know how to write device drivers to proprietary technology? on a changing DD-SDK?

  151. Re:Security by rochrist · · Score: 1

    Both.

  152. Happened to me too by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

    I was hard at work on my Win8.1 machine, and the "Upgrade"-dialog popped up. I dismissed it; (yes, by clicking the red 'X'.)

    Next, I took a call from a client, and mid-conversation, I saw that my machine was busy upgrading to Win10. I had to excuse myself for losing my train of thought during our conversation, and had to wait almost two hours for it to complete, then another hour for it to downgrade once I refused the Terms of Service. I was furious, and let Microsoft know it.

  153. It's Windows, get over it. by bitterblackale · · Score: 1

    1, 2, 3.11, 95, 98, NT4.5, NT5, 2000, ME, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1, 10 (9 must have really sucked balls... did anyone hear about it?), Who cares, really, what version it is? Your computer is still going to Blue Screen and go pout in a corner like a moody teenager unless you use it exclusively for the tasks it was meant to do: i.e. gaming and re-partitioning your drive to install Linux for real work :P

  154. Boycott! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    It is BAD for EVERYONE to allow this sort of unethical, dishonest behavior. It is incumbent on ALL peoples to demand that the entity 'Microsoft' fix this, and all related behaviors, immediately in order to regain any integrity. Until MS stops treating people like money mines, they need to be boycotted.

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  155. Re:Security by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Microsoft knows there are millions of computers out there that cannot be upgraded without destroying the ability to perform the work they were bought to perform. And they don't care.

    And that's fraudulent.

    Oh no, they care. They want you to go out and set up and Active Directory domain to put all your computers on and manage them that way.For many years, things that should have been a system setting or at most a registry setting have been going over to Active Directory. I keep running into issues where the published MS solution begins with "Have your Active Directory administrator..." I wouldn't doubt that this is just the beginning of making all consumer PCs connect to and be managed by a giant consumer domain controlled by MS.

  156. Re:Security by CTU · · Score: 1

    "Tester: Windows 10 needs more work, auto updates sucks, ads suck, and you are killing privacy with all the snooping...it will be hated

    MS executive: Your to negative...your fired...you and your team Windows 10 is the best and will ship now"

  157. Re:Security by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1

    Since they DIDN'T upgrade to Windows 10, they obviously had recommended updates turned off. They were proactive about their computers. The problem here is Microsoft is changing the game, obfuscating the Windows 10 upgrade in the hope that you will install the update disguised behind the completely ineffective red "X".

    That Microsoft has to resort to this subterfuge to get people to install their software reeks of desperation.

    --

    How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

  158. Re:Security by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

    Link your Windows live accounts and you kinda just did make your Windows 8/10 PC basically get managed by the Microsoft controller ;)

    @taustin that AC who says you are doing things wrong may sound a bit brash, you have to acknowledge (to yourself at least) that he is sort of right... if you were running the POS systems connected to a domain controller you have the ability to enforce code signing (app locker), security policies, which updates are pushed etc. - many options which will help protect your employees and customers and if you were running Enterprise, your Windows 7 devices wouldn't even attempt to upgrade and you have the legal entitlement to image and clone your Windows 7 base image onto the POS systems you purchase and bring into your network. If you were really crazy in IT you would have your POS systems as thin/zero clients.

    I understand franchises try to force franchisees to buy their chosen fixtures they chose through their purchase channels - guess it's all part of the game.

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  159. Re:Security by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

    Since they DIDN'T upgrade to Windows 10, they obviously had recommended updates turned off. They were proactive about their computers. The problem here is Microsoft is changing the game, obfuscating the Windows 10 upgrade in the hope that you will install the update disguised behind the completely ineffective red "X".

    I think you're mistaken...

    There wouldn't be a "red X" to click if they had recommended updates turned off. That they had anything to click says they were on.

    Finally, I'll bring up another point... how many businesses are running Windows Home edition that has less control than the business editions? There is another problem.

    I run a domain in my office, I control the network and updates myself, all my computers run the Pro edition of Windows and there are differences that matter for an administered environment.

    If you depend on technology for your business to work, then you're in the tech business, at least in so far as you must have someone who understands all this and keeps ahead of it. Either employ someone or hire a company or person to do it for you.

  160. Re:Security by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    Microsoft told me it was my fault they upgraded me to Windows 10 while I slept because I was wearing slutty clothes.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  161. Re:Security by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    "You may have been the victim of piracy"

  162. Re: Security by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Considering that you post responses elsewhere after the fact but don't address the risk raised regarding your company, it's becoming quite clear you're just running one of those companies that don't care to protect customers, employees and business partners. I can only hope they all learn of your poor practices and take adequate actions against you for your neglegence.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.