Slashdot Mirror


Steve Wozniak May Swap His Tesla For A Chevy Bolt (siliconbeat.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes a San Jose Mercury News article about "Apple co-founder and electric vehicle fan Steve Wozniak." Woz posted a picture of himself, smiling, next to a new, white Chevy Bolt. General Motors gave Woz the fully electric sedan for an extended test drive. He liked it. "I expect to be switching cars soon!" Woz wrote in a photo caption.

The battery-powered Bolt is due for release late this year. The four-door hatchback has an advertised range of 200 miles per charge, with a sticker price around $37,500. The EV will compete head-to-head with the Tesla Model 3. The Tesla entry-level sedan, expected to start at $35,000, will be released late next year.

It's interesting to read Wozniak's later comments on the post. "A lot of things wrong with the Tesla model S are done correctly (my opinion) in this car... It gets down to my product ideas of balance and getting the most from the least. Try to make things simple and affordable but very adequate. This car hits my sweet spot."

And in response to the obvious question, Woz replied "Maybe one Segway would fit. And a seat can be folded down."

286 comments

  1. A real comparison? by sid+crimson · · Score: 2

    As someone who'd love an electric car, I'm already out of the running with a family of four children. I don't have the cash for a "second" car - it make better financial sense for me to spend that cash on gasoline.

    That said, I was salivating over the Model 3. The Bolt looks good, and is a step in the right direction, but it's a MUCH smaller vehicle. Plus, as a Chevy owner, I don't hear ANY stories of how my car's manufacturer goes above and beyond to support me. Shoot, my car company even declined to honor a transferred warranty from the previous owner (I paid my fee) and then later declined to honor a voluntary recall because my vehicle was beyond their mileage limit by 100 miles.

    Seems like all I hear about Tesla is "we're working to become awesome" and from their owners "it's true, they are awesome." Aim for that level of satisfaction, Chevy, and I'll purchase an Acadia.

    1. Re:A real comparison? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who'd love an electric car, I'm already out of the running with a family of four children. I don't have the cash for a "second" car

      Electric cars are still bleeding edge. The amount you save on gasoline, even over the full life of the car, will not pay for the premium price. You don't buy them to save money. You buy them to help change the world (and maybe for the convenience). If battery improvements continue at their current pace, the financial break even point is still five or ten years away.

      Seems like all I hear about Tesla is "we're working to become awesome" and from their owners "it's true, they are awesome."

      My wife has a Tesla. Yes, their customer support is awesome. So are their cars.

    2. Re:A real comparison? by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems like all I hear about Tesla is "we're working to become awesome" and from their owners "it's true, they are awesome."

      You can afford to be awesome when you're selling $100k luxury cars with probably a profit margin (excluding R&D costs) of $10k-$20k each.

      When you're building $30k cars with razor-thin margins of a few hundred dollars each, it's a whole 'nother ballgame. I would love it if Tesla can keep up their current policies and support with the Model 3, but I seriously doubt they'll be able to. Even the free supercharges for life is questionable for the Model 3.

    3. Re:A real comparison? by sid+crimson · · Score: 1

      I own my autos for a looooong time, enough time (you saw my note about the extended warranty?) for there to be a financial return. So, yes - I *can* purchase an electric car "to save money". ;-)

    4. Re:A real comparison? by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Tesla is the modern-day Saturn. Companies like that are worth supporting.

    5. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Tesla is more like DeLorean, except for that fact that John was actually a decent human being and Elon is a smarmy South African swindler. After a few more "Auto-pilot" deaths and exploding rockets, hopefully his goose will be cooked and he can go back to on-line payment scams.

    6. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're building $30k cars with razor-thin margins of a few hundred dollars each, it's a whole 'nother ballgame.

      That's total BS. A battery, an inverter, an electric motor, and a fixed ratio transmission are all the major components of the drive train of an electric car. An ICE car would easily have thrice or more number of components. In spite of that, electric cars are 50% to 400% more expensive. I agree the batteries are expensive, but even if you omit their cost, the car cost is higher than gas cars. And that's because greedy car manufacturers want to charge extra for new technology and there's very little competition.

      It's like a desktop vs a laptop. Even though the laptop has a slower CPU, slower and less RAM, it still costs the consumer consumer more than the desktop. That's because the consumer benefits more from a laptop than a desktop and therefore the laptop maker feels entitled to charge more. It has nothing to do with cost of manufacturing and everything to do with how it benefits the consumer.

      I bet these $30k cars cost somewhere between $10k to $12k to manufacture, no more.

    7. Re:A real comparison? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      The interior of the Bolt is probably larger than the Model 3.

      The Bolt does have its downsides, though. The Model 3 is faster, has better aerodynamics and probably handles better. The Model 3's charging network is much superior, especially since GM is relying on the market to supply chargers.

      Nonetheless, like the Woz, I think I'd prefer a Bolt. None of them will handle four children, though.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    8. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remind me again where to buy a new saturn-branded vehicle? if tesla is the 'new saturn', i'll stick with gas guzzlers, tyvm

    9. Re:A real comparison? by topologicalanomaly47 · · Score: 2

      The laptop - desktop analogy is wrong.

    10. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Coward didn't know about power consumption to performance ratio, but should know the story on electric cars. Sounds legit.

    11. Re:A real comparison? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's like a desktop vs a laptop.

      Oh my god, now cars are breeding computer analogies! It some sort of horrible re-enforcing circle of madness.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    12. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least John had high values!

      How long before they discover the real purpose for that giant battery factory?

      They couldn't get much higher.

    13. Re:A real comparison? by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even the free supercharges for life is questionable for the Model 3.

      No, it isn't questionable. It's not going to exist.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me again what DMC was a front for again? Oh yeah, cocaine smuggling.

      Reeeeeeeeal decent human being there

    15. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has a Tesla. Yes, their customer support is awesome. So are their cars.

      Wrong their cars are certified lemons.

    16. Re:A real comparison? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      You know why I want an electric car? It's all about time.

      - I can drive on the HOV lane and reduce my commute time by half.
      - Maintenance required is dramatically reduced (i.e. no oil changes.)
      - No more weekly trip to the gas station (I couldn't care less about the $30 it costs to fill my tank; I make that much money in a very short amount of time.)

      Still, a tesla model S is beyond my price range, and I'm presently saving the cash to buy a house during the next financial and real-estate collapse (which I'm predicting is going to hit sometime in the range of late 2017 and early 2018) so I'm not going to dispose of it on a car.

    17. Re: A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analogies are like cars, in that they allow for otherwise immobile people to be moved to... Fuck I can't think of one.

    18. Re:A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing about electrics though is the gas is a small part of the savings. There just aren't significant parts to break and need replacement; though obviously depending on design.

      No ICE, no oil, no maintenance. No transmission, just a straight connection from motor to wheel (linkages as necessary but no gears, etc).

      Replacing a battery isn't cheap but it is a very very straightforward thing. Unlike replacing an engine, which your transmission isn't engineered for.

      The 'life' of an electric vehicle should realistically be multiple years beyond even the best ICE vehicles...bringing the ownership cost down even farther.

      And then take into account that if you can put in a house battery and solar, you could get your 'fuel' entirely for free. You'll never do that with an ICE even with ethanol. This perhaps ties to your 5-10 years prediction which is reasonable. But there are still lots of savings involved beyond the fuel.

      The cheapest option of course is a used ICE car for $5-10K ;-)

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    19. Re:A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      regarding the HOV...that may not exist for long.

      I live in VA outside DC and have hybrid plates that let me get in the HOV solo. That allowance is federal rule that ends when the roadway is classified as 'degraded' in terms of traffic flow. I-66 in VA fully meets that classification :( so as of 2017 any 'Clean Special Fuel', including full electric, vehicles will no longer qualify for HOV exemption.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    20. Re:A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      The cost isn't in the cars themselves. It's the tooling and manufacturing costs of a factory line spread out over a very small set of cars.

      Economies of scale are why Honda, Toyota, Ford, GM, etc can sell as cheap as they can.

      That the Bolt will only cost basically the same as it's predecessor the Volt? that's cost coming down significantly as the amortization of the factory costs pays off.

      And take into account that a business model of ICE cars involves kick backs and such between dealer and manufacturer. The dealer can absorb a hit on selling price because they'll make it up in maintenance. Electrics have a miniscule maintenance cost in comparison. So less likely you'll see the same price breaks on electrics.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    21. Re:A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Go look up 'customer satisfaction'. The reason GM canned it is it was making the rest of their dealers look like complete shit.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    22. Re:A real comparison? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 4, Informative

      The amount you save on gasoline, even over the full life of the car, will not pay for the premium price.

      Not for current cars, but that's where the Model 3 is so exciting. $35000 is the median car price for new cars in the US, and that's where the Model 3 is intended to hit. There certainly was a premium for the Model S, but the premium is no longer there for the Model 3. Heck, if Chevy is going to try to sell the compact-sized Bolt for 35000, you could say that the Model 3 will be selling at a discount being as it's a bigger car with more features (like, say, a charging infrastructure).

      By my calculation, I'll save about $1000 / year on energy costs over my Honda Civic. I normally keep cars for 10 years or so, so I'll be about $10,000 ahead at the end of my ownership - which is about the premium I'd pay over buying a new Civic. That's assuming that gas stays at it's current low price - let it climb back up to $4 or $5, and I'll be way ahead.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    23. Re:A real comparison? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Except that you are stranded for hours while your piece of shit electric recharges.

      My electric car has a range of 240 miles. It can charge to 80% of that in 20 minutes. I have never been "stranded".

      If you regularly drive long distances, then an electric car is not a good choice. They are not for everyone.

    24. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gasoline car has a range of 410 miles and it can be refueled in under 5 minutes, pretty much anywhere in the country, even shit hole one traffic light towns.

      If you stay near the supercharger network or something, I guess you'd be okay, but in the rest of the US, good luck!

    25. Re:A real comparison? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      So, 90% of Americans would be fine.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    26. Re:A real comparison? by Tesen · · Score: 2

      So, 90% of Americans would be fine.

      Bingo! I drive long distances to random hiking trails. An electric car is not for me, considering some of the trail heads can be located at a different GPS location, so exploring for it instead of predictable location is not a must for me. But you know what? A car is a tool and you pick the tool that works for you.

    27. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has a Tesla. Yes, their customer support is awesome.

      Me: My car won't start.
      Customer Support: Did you try turning it off and on again?

    28. Re:A real comparison? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My gasoline car has a range of 410 miles and it can be refueled in under 5 minutes

      If you regularly drive 400+ miles in one trip, your family only has one car, and it is important that you can refuel in only 5 minutes, rather than taking a 20 minute break after 6 hours of driving, then here is the solution to your problem: DON'T BUY AN ELECTRIC CAR.

      For plenty of other people, electric cars work well.

    29. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

    30. Re: A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analogies are like assholes. Everyone's got one.

    31. Re:A real comparison? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Electric cars are still bleeding edge. The amount you save on gasoline, even over the full life of the car, will not pay for the premium price. You don't buy them to save money.

      I did, and it worked. The payoff period for my LEAF ended up being a bit longer than expected because when I bought it (in 2012) I was projecting that gas prices would continue increasing, when in fact they dropped dramatically, but it has paid for itself. Note that that calculation does include just over $9K in tax credits, and charging partially at work. Without those, my payoff period would have been about 10 years, which is a bit long, but about the amount of time I keep a car. Actually, it's probably a bit better than that because maintenance costs on an EV are lower.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    32. Re:A real comparison? by atheos · · Score: 1

      yea, I heard similar arguments before purchasing the Hybrid that I drive daily. That was 200k miles and 13 years ago, pretty sure I'm money ahead.

    33. Re:A real comparison? by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the battery replacement after about 100 K miles at a cost of $3,000. That's what my niece's Prius required.

    34. Re:A real comparison? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      My wife has a Tesla. Yes, their customer support is awesome. So are their cars.

      My wife has a Toyota, I have no idea what their customer support is like, since in 8 years (so far), it has had zero problems.

    35. Re:A real comparison? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the battery replacement after about 100 K miles at a cost of $3,000. That's what my niece's Prius required.

      Battery technology has improved.There are lots of people whose Prius cars have gone much further on the original battery.

      Also, are you 100% sure it needed a new battery? Like this guy whose Prius battery "failed" and the dealer wanted a similar amount to replace it, but it turned out to be just a dirty connector.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    36. Re:A real comparison? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      I don't have any children. If you do have four children it might limit your choices in what cat to buy, though.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    37. Re:A real comparison? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Dealers make fuckall on warranty work. They have to keep the suckers around after the warranty to make bucks.

      That's starting to fail, nobody stays that stupid forever. As new car buyers keep their cars longer, they wake up, one by one. Used car buyers, as a group, never took their cars to dealerships for work.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    38. Re:A real comparison? by rfengr · · Score: 1

      You just need to GTFO of NOVA; I did 20 years ago. Hell, they can't even keep the damn metro working.

    39. Re:A real comparison? by rfengr · · Score: 1

      This is /. so most don't have the opportunity to make children.

    40. Re: A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point cowboy? My volt gets 3000 miles a tank. I go months between fill ups. I can drive hundreds of miles on a single fill-up, and yet I don't waste fuel when I idle on my way to work. I don't use any gas to go to work. The car cost me $10k after tax deductions. Sure, they will go away soon, but so will guzzlers like your car.

    41. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gasoline car has a range of 410 miles and it can be refueled in under 5 minutes

      If you regularly drive 400+ miles in one trip, your family only has one car, and it is important that you can refuel in only 5 minutes, rather than taking a 20 minute break after 6 hours of driving, then here is the solution to your problem: DON'T BUY AN ELECTRIC CAR.

      For plenty of other people, electric cars work well.

      Right. If you regularly drive 400+ miles in one trip (and assuming it's just back and forth between two destinations), you should buy 3 electric cars so that there will always be one car fully charged at each destination.

    42. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, and I say this as someone who lived near Spring Hill.

      The reason GM canned it was because it wasn't making money. It wasn't located near any major river or highway. There were no train tracks or ports nearby. The number of "custom" Saturn suppliers that built up around spring hill _AND NOWHERE ELSE_ made things insanely difficult to ship to other dealers. Parts got super expensive. QC was shot within the first few years because the "different kind of car company" couldn't actually keep up with it's problems, couldn't deliver parts, etc. It was a car company in the middle of fucking nowhere Tennessee.

      Eventually Saturn parts started getting made elsewhere for far cheaper. The lines got converted to run on different GM bases because it was just too expensive to ship shit all the way out to Spring Hill and then ship it all the way back to a major transpo hub. They canned the brand because the "experiment" failed. They couldn't BE a different kind of car company and continue to be subsidized by GM. Once the corporate welfare went away, they were losses year over year. Quality fell apart as the suppliers could no longer stay limited to Saturn and in the game. They started going with second rate suppliers from China, and encountering even MORE problems.. not to mention costs of shipping and it's still middle of fucking nowhere Tennessee.

      Finally GM stopped the bleeding.

      It didn't end because they were embarrassing the rest of GM. It ended because quality fell off a cliff and Saturn couldn't afford to exist.

    43. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has a Tesla. Yes, their customer support is awesome. So are their cars.

      My wife has a Toyota, I have no idea what their customer support is like, since in 8 years (so far), it has had zero problems.

      I can say that after owning 3 Chrysler products and having visited like 10 Chrysler dealers, they all have absolutely horrible service.

      I complained to Chrysler once about a dealer refusing to make an appointment for replacing my car's dead alternator, because it was under a recall. They suggested they'd give me an appointment if I was buying it myself. FCA corporate's response was to do nothing and close my case about a month later.

    44. Re:A real comparison? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      This is part of the reason trains outlast buses... the oldest NYC subway cars (built 1964) are being complained about as having a "low" mean distance between failure at 35,000 miles, versus 400,000 miles on the newest cars. Streetcars in many cities see daily operation at well over 30 years old, some even 70.

      If my car only needed service every 35,000 miles after 50 years I would say it was a piece of machinery handed down from the gods...

    45. Re:A real comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I asked some Tesla owners for tips on buying a used one, and their response was "don't, unless you get it from Tesla direct."

      The earlier cars in particular seen to have a lot of issues. You really need that support from Tesla. It's a shame because I'd like to get one, but spending that amount of money I'd want to know it was well covered.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    46. Re:A real comparison? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Statement not supported by facts [torquenews.com].

      Perhaps read my comment and re-read your article. Your article talks about maintenance costs being basically the same. My comment talks about time concerns. These are not the same thing.

      Except that you are stranded for hours while your piece of shit electric recharges.

      I'll be sure to remember that next time it charges in the garage overnight. Oh wait, you mean you expect me to drive out to BFE all the time? Guess what, I almost never go there, and when I do, I have a truck that is much better suited for offroad than a commuter vehicle.

      This is like the shitty argument Verizon uses "oh but our service is worth twice as much because it often works in bumble fuck egypt, even though you probably never actually go to bumble fuck egypt to begin with."

    47. Re:A real comparison? by rrittenhouse · · Score: 2

      There's exactly two examples of problems with a Tesla in that blog. That's hardly "certified lemons"

      --
      -- I may be paranoid, but I'm still alive
    48. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell did you have to ruin a nice post with a stupid fucking winkie-face?!?

      And a shit-eating grin in your sig block?

      This isn't a site for 12 year olds; knock it the fuck off.

    49. Re:A real comparison? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you do have four children it might limit your choices in what cat to buy, though.

      With that many squirts, the chance of at least one with pet allergies is pretty high, so you're right... you'll likely be restricted to ugly hairless monstrosities.

      Average is somewhat less than 4, and not surprisingly, so is the typical spacial consideration.

    50. Re:A real comparison? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they probably changed ownership 3 times over the life of your support case. Things get lost in the shuffle.

    51. Re:A real comparison? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether you want the children. If yes, a house cat, if not, a lion cub.

    52. Re:A real comparison? by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      You know why I want an electric car? It's all about time.

      - I can drive on the HOV lane and reduce my commute time by half.
      - Maintenance required is dramatically reduced (i.e. no oil changes.)
      - No more weekly trip to the gas station (I couldn't care less about the $30 it costs to fill my tank; I make that much money in a very short amount of time.)

      Still, a tesla model S is beyond my price range, and I'm presently saving the cash to buy a house during the next financial and real-estate collapse (which I'm predicting is going to hit sometime in the range of late 2017 and early 2018) so I'm not going to dispose of it on a car.

      Oil changes for modern cars only need to be done every 10,000 miles, that's 15 to 20 minutes twice a year for most people. So, you're saving maybe 60 minutes a year (including commute time to the garage).

    53. Re:A real comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      They have already let slip that it will be pay as you go. There might be an unlimited option but the code for adding credits is already on their site.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    54. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'life' of an electric vehicle should realistically be multiple years beyond even the best ICE vehicles...bringing the ownership cost down even farther.

      Not going to happen. Vehicles lifetime is due to planned obsolescence, not engineering limits.

      Car manufacturers try to cover it up (e.g. See irrelevant nonsense in wikipedia) but average car lifetime has gone down by more than a factor of 2 in the last fifty years.

      Anybody claiming significantly improved lifetime on pretty much any product these days is usually a lying marketer.

    55. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all knew the day would come!

    56. Re:A real comparison? by BostonPilot · · Score: 2

      In what way has the average car lifetime decreased?

      When I was a kid (50 years ago) most cars were end of life at 60-100,000 miles. I can not even imaging an average car from those days going 300,000 miles, and yet if you told me you were driving a 2010 Honda Civic with 300,000 miles I wouldn't be at all surprised. Not saying every Civic goes 300,000 miles, but it's not all that unusual. Cars in the 60s and 70s didn't go 200,000 miles let alone 300,000 miles.

      I'm sure you can point to a few old cars with lots of miles on them, but where I grew up (New England) cars just didn't last that long. Some of that was rust. The first time I travelled to California in 1980 I was blown away to see all the old cars from the 50s and 60s. None of those cars existed in New England because they had all rusted away by then.

      It wasn't just rust though. My dad had been a mechanic as a kid, and he taught me to maintain cars. I've overhauled a couple engines by myself. The component reliability back then just wasn't as good as it is now. Probably a combination of both materials and machining tolerances. If you didn't live in northern states with salt on the roads you could probably keep a car going, but just like today there's a point in the maintenance curve where large numbers of parts simply are worn out, and it gets to be prohibitively expensive to keep fixing the car. Someone else mentioned planned obsolescence, but in my opinion it's not that. It costs money, weight, materials, etc. to design a part with a specific lifetime. Why would you design a component to last 100 years and 1,000,000 miles when you know the rest of the car won't last that long? It's just an engineering tradeoff to determine what the lifetime of the component should be. Back then, nobody worried about making components last much past 100,000 miles. Spark plugs are an easy example, but there are obviously lots more.

      It's certainly true that longevity among manufacturers can be very different. I don't think any manufacturers are as good as Honda and Toyota for reliability and longevity, but even some crappy Chevy is going to last a lot longer today than some crappy Chevy did from the 70s...

    57. Re:A real comparison? by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right, coming from a Honda Civic. I have a Subaru STi which gets about 20 mpg. I leased a Honda Fit EV mostly for my daughters, but the first year I had it they didn't have their licenses yet so I drove it on my daily commute. The STi was costing me about $4,000 per year for gas just for the commute to work (but that was when gas was more expensive). The Honda Fit EV cost about $400 in electricity for that year, so I saved a lot more than you are estimating, but part of that is because the Subaru doesn't get as good milage as a Civic.

      I didn't lease the Fit to save money, though. I did it because I wanted to help transition us from fossil fuel to renewables. If global warming is true (and I think it probably is) we need to get on a path to correct GW. BEV seems like the only obvious short term way to get there.

      I don't like big cars, so the Model S doesn't really appeal to me, but I'm anxious to see how the Model 3 turns out and will likely buy one. If not, by then the other manufacturers will be starting to offer sporty electric cars. In any case, my next car will certainly be a BEV or a BEV with a range assist engine like the BMW (but not a vehicle like a Volt or a plug in hybrid).

    58. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who'd love an electric car, I'm already out of the running with a family of four children. I don't have the cash for a "second" car - it make better financial sense for me to spend that cash on gasoline.

      That said, I was salivating over the Model 3. The Bolt looks good, and is a step in the right direction, but it's a MUCH smaller vehicle. Plus, as a Chevy owner, I don't hear ANY stories of how my car's manufacturer goes above and beyond to support me. Shoot, my car company even declined to honor a transferred warranty from the previous owner (I paid my fee) and then later declined to honor a voluntary recall because my vehicle was beyond their mileage limit by 100 miles.

      Seems like all I hear about Tesla is "we're working to become awesome" and from their owners "it's true, they are awesome." Aim for that level of satisfaction, Chevy, and I'll purchase an Acadia.

      Those are fair criticisms.

      I would argue though that the Model 3 may not be what you want either; I would trust Chevy over Tesla any day with a car of that price. Tesla's business offers the service of the high end luxury car market because that's what they sell, high-end luxury cars in low volume. When the Model 3 launches, they will have probably around 200,000 Model S's on the road with many passing 100,000 miles to service plus (assuming they make their targets which they never have before) 500,000 Model 3s. They can't cost effectively scale that level of service to support the Model 3 with the same service they provide the Model S. On top of that to meet the Model 3 demands they need to scale their production by a factor of 10X or more; that is a difficult thing to do. There are always flaws and production hiccups when that happens, so the Model 3 may need a lot of love from Tesla in warranty costs to keep it in business. And Tesla is a cash furnace; they're a LONG ways from being profitable and thus sustainable.

      You may have had poor service with GM/Chevy and I get it, but Tesla has an enormous mountain to climb to make the Model 3 a sustainable business and maintain any level of service.

    59. Re:A real comparison? by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      Toyotas and Hondas are amazing from a reliability standpoint. And the dealers we have locally (Toyota for my wife and Subaru and Honda for me) are actually pretty nice to deal with. I have no illusions that they're making good money off of us (you just have to look at the swanky dealership to see that) but the service they provide is good.

      Tesla is a new company, learning how to build an automotive company from scratch. It's sort of a risky way to do it. It would have been much better if companies like Chevy would have designed the Bolt without external pressure, but that obviously wasn't going to happen. We needed Tesla to make it happen, and I have a lot of respect for Elon Musk for making it happen.

      That said, I think it will be a difficult next 5 years for Tesla, and there's a good chance they won't survive. They basically have to execute the Model 3 flawlessly. If they screw up and die, I hope at this point that there is enough momentum for electric vehicles that the industry will still continue to convert.

      So far, Tesla seems to have not made many missteps. If they can continue that there's a good chance they'll make it long term. I hope so!

    60. Re:A real comparison? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The Bolt looks good, and is a step in the right direction, but it's a MUCH smaller vehicle

      Are you talking about externally? Because the inside of the Bold is 94 cu. ft., and 17 cu. ft. of cargo. in a 5 passenger vehicle that weighs over 600 lb less than the Model 3. There were complaints about the Model 3's lack of cargo space., and I can't find interior dimensions anywhere. 600 lbs. is a huge reduction in overall energy usage.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    61. Re:A real comparison? by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      Even the free supercharges for life is questionable for the Model 3.

      I actually hope they don't offer free supercharging, nor even a flat rate "$x buys you unlimited supercharger access".

      I think that the superchargers will be overwhelmed by the sheer number of Model 3's trying to recharge. I have a Honda Fit EV (BEV) and I almost always charge at home. It's quite rare that I have to charge away from home, and when I do I just use the ChargePoint app to find a free charger. I have money on account with ChargePoint and when I use a non-free charger, they simply deduct the cost of the recharge from the account. In 3 years I don't think I've used $20 worth of electricity yet.. I think Tesla can offer a similar service with the Superchargers.

      The problem with making it free, or even flat rate plans where you purchase unlimited access to the superchargers is that then people will be incentivized to use the Supercharger as often as possible (to get "free" electricity). You want to encourage the opposite. Superchargers should be there to alleviate the achilles heel of BEVs: lack of long range. If you set up a system where local people are mobbing the Superchargers for "free" electricity, then the stations will be often tied up when a long distance traveler needs to recharge to complete a trip.

      Since I have a garage, and a charger in my garage, I'm probably biased. I know there are a lot of people who live in apartments or otherwise don't have charging available at home. I don't think Superchargers will work for those people; there needs to be a new charging infrastructure to handle that kind of user. Besides, having to sit at the Supercharger station while the car charges negates one of the benefits of BEV cars. When I get home from driving the BEV it takes me 10 seconds to plug it in and it charges while I go do something else. Having to drive to a Supercharger site and wait to recharge would be pretty inconvenient.

    62. Re:A real comparison? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      I drive a highly reliable vehicle for less than average numbers of miles each year. In my state we are not allowed to pump our own gas, so I tend to be much less involved in my vehicle than the average. I get my oil changed by the best shop in town. I like the people there, get a free coffee and some sweet, read from their extensive and free-loanable library, while I savor being associated with good people. When the change is done I get a report that is detailed, itemized, never a surprise but often includes a warning of something I'll need to something about in a year or two. My oil change experience is like what going to the barber shop used to be -- priceless.

      --
      I come here for the love
    63. Re: A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So one person has a lemon and they are all 'certified' lemons?

    64. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, 90% of Americans would be fine.

      However of that 90% a huge number of them don't have a garage, don't have charging stations in their apartment parking lots, or park on the street where there are no outlets either.

    65. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You buy them to help change the world

      Oh man you sound like such a hipster.

      You buy it because you're rich enough to enjoy it either for the drive or as a status symbol. To "help change the world" you can invest directly in battery research.

    66. Re:A real comparison? by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      I'm hopeful, but I've come to expect that whatever you 'save', *they* will eventually want the same amount of money they used to take.

      Color me a naive young Canadian homeowner :P

      Conserve water effort... refit my house with water saving items... oops now the government is not taking in enough money from water usage, they increase the base connection fee.

      Conserve electricity effort... refit my house with energy efficient appliances and lights... oops now the government / electricity providers want more money for whatever their programs are.

      Try to get off cable... get netflix and a home NAS... oops guess the cable company doesn't like that and they price it so you basically have to take cable. Don't get cable, your bundle is crappy and they raise the price of the internet to make up for their cable losses.

      Oh sure, there might be some short term saving from electric cars. But I don't think you're going to save money in the end. Oh sure, you might not use gas. But then the government is going not have as much tax revenue from gas taxes. Oooops, suddenly there are more road tolls or distance driven based pricing. No doubt these electric cars will be 'highly' connected and oops... the complex electronics are designed to fail after the magical 10 year mark.

      Now you can call me a cynical Canadian :P
      So yeah, I still do things to be better for the environment or what have you. But I've pretty much given up on the idea that I'll be saving money long term. Do it because it feels good to do the right thing if you want. But I just don't see them letting us drive for less.

    67. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a NPV basis or just straight cash basis?

      13 years is a long time for interest compounding.

    68. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric cars are still bleeding edge. The amount you save on gasoline, even over the full life of the car, will not pay for the premium price.

      That's not true at all. My commute is 42 miles each way. Driving a Honda Accord I used to spend about $240 per month on gas (at $2.50 per gallon) and $34 per month on oil changes. The same commute on electricity costs me about $75 in electricity and no oil changes. That alone buys me a $12,000 price premium for an electric vehicle (60 months of saving $199 per month). When you couple the Federal and state tax rebates and incentives, it becomes a $22,000 price premium that are covered by cost savings.

    69. Re:A real comparison? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      They have already let slip that it will be pay as you go.

      That was my point.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    70. Re:A real comparison? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      How can you not have the cash for a second car? Just about every lower-middle-class and up family in America has two cars, out of necessity: two wage-earners can't easily get to work in a single car.

      Now if you're a single person with 4 kids, I can understand why you wouldn't want or be able to afford a second car.

      But I do agree with you about the Chevy brand: if it weren't for that, I would have given the Volt a much more serious examination before I bought my Mazda.

    71. Re: A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      So GM sabotaged it with a poor business model? Sorta my point

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    72. Re: A real comparison? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The car cost me $10k after tax deductions.

      How'd that work out?

    73. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people keep acting as if the engine is the only thing that requires maintenance and repair. Your electric car still has brakes that do get used (not all braking is regenerative) and you still have a suspension and linkages and all sorts of other mechanical and electrical items that will still break down over time.

    74. Re: A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      A flat fee won't increase with usage so savings on rates with efficient appliances will offset that. Everything you mention is government regulated...so you have a say in it. Get organized and demand changes.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    75. Re:A real comparison? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No ICE, no oil, no maintenance. No transmission, just a straight connection from motor to wheel (linkages as necessary but no gears, etc).

      Wrong.

      Teslas have a single-speed gearbox. Electric motors generally run at speeds too high to directly drive road wheels. A gearbox is necessarily going to have oil.

      And Teslas, while they don't have "motor oil", do use coolant to control the motor and battery temperature.

      I don't know what maintenance is required for either of these items, but most likely the gearbox oil does need to be changed at 100k if not sooner, and probably the motor coolant too at some point.

      The main things you save with an EV like the Tesla is not having to do 5k-10k oil changes, as well as air and fuel filter changes (usually 50k/100k), and spark plug changes (100k). If you do those things yourself, they're dirt cheap. The biggest real-life savings you'll likely see with an EV are 1) if you have a garage, you can recharge it every night and not have to spend time at a gas station, and 2) your likelihood of mechanical failure is somewhat lower because of the reduced complexity of the drivetrain (but remember, there's a lot more to a car than just the engine and transmission: the suspension, steering, brakes, and various electronic modules are mostly common to both types of cars).

    76. Re:A real comparison? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I commuted on I-66 for over 20 years...15 miles = 1 hour. Best plate seen IH8I66. While I still live nearby, I no longer commute in that direction, and I'm so much looking forward to getting the hell out of NOVA in a few years when I retire.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    77. Re:A real comparison? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ok, this brings up several questions: (note, I'm not a Saturn fan at all)

      1) Where did they get the bright idea of locating a car division and manufacturing plant in BFE, Tennessee, not near any train tracks or ports?

      2) Why didn't they just move it, repurpose one of their other factories, etc.?

      Towards the end, it seemed like Saturns were basically just re-brands of other GM cars anyway, and not something special and different.

    78. Re: A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Lots less things to break...glad you agree

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    79. Re: A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Ok a single fixed gear. Vastly simpler and far less likelyhood of failure. My point stands.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    80. Re:A real comparison? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Not that simple. The battery itself is a consumable. If the battery has 200 miles of range, and you discharge it 50% on average, it might last 1500 cycles. (this is very specific to the battery in question)

      So the battery is expended at 150k miles. Tesla reports $190 per kWh pre gigafactory, GM reports $145. Taking the lower number, the actual cost of the battery is $6380. Assume Tesla/GM charges only a negligible markup for the good press, the replacement battery is $7000. So 5 cents a mile is the battery consumption.

      Huh, not nearly as bad as when I did this calculation previously. If gas is $3 a gallon and you get 35 mpg, gas is 8.5 cents a mile.

      You aren't saving much. Admittedly, with a gas car at 150k miles, the car is nearing the end of it's service life. You can drive them longer but expensive repairs are going to hit you eventually. Like an automatic transmission repair, which can be 4-5k, and an electric car doesn't have such a transmission. (but it uses power regulation circuitry that is also expensive to repair and also wears out...)

      So an exact answer will depend on actual battery life numbers and actual dollar for dollar prices. You aren't going to save much if any if you buy a new electric car, however.

    81. Re:A real comparison? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      So get one that's still got a year or two on the warranty...they cover 4 years. Also, I don't know about Tesla, but many auto companies will still allow you to purchase an extended warranty when the original is about to expire.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    82. Re:A real comparison? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why do you think there will be a 2017-2018 collapse, specifically? I'm not disagreeing that certain factors may be unsustainable, but the housing bubble in certain areas is driven by a supply shortage due to corrupt local governments. (aka, the liberal and captive governments of LA or Toronto will tie up any future projects in endless environmental reviews and community meetings)

    83. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never met anyone who actually "liked" their Saturn, usually they just admitted to have one because they were too cheap or broke-ass to get a Honda Civic or something else that was higher quality and more reliable.

    84. Re:A real comparison? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. Actual Americans might drive ultra long distance once a year. I haven't personally done it for a decade. I just take a plane, but even if I did it once a year, that means that I have to extend a 2 day cross country trip just a few hours on chargers. Not a significant factor.

    85. Re:A real comparison? by GreggBz · · Score: 1

      The Bolt looks good, and is a step in the right direction, but it's a MUCH smaller vehicle.

      Although I can't find dimensions for the Model 3, interior volume wise, the Bolt is comparable to a small SUV. With the seats up it has 16.9 cu feet of cargo volume (which is better than a Honda Fit or a BMW i3) and passenger dimensions that are better than my wife's 2005 Toyota RAV4.

      With the seats down, it has 56.6 cu feet of cargo volume, which is quite a bit. 56.6 cu/feet is almost as much as the Model S, and, arguably, more usable as the cargo area is one big cube and has a large rear hatch opening.

      Smaller on the outside, maybe, but I've had the fortune to sit in a pre-production Bolt and it's nice and roomy. It was airy and felt noticeably bigger than the wife's RAV 4.

    86. Re:A real comparison? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

        According to the New York Times, in the 1960s and 1970s, the typical car reached its end of life around 100,000 miles, but due to manufacturing improvements such as tighter tolerances and better anti-corrosion coatings, in the 2000s the typical car lasts closer to 200,000 miles

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    87. Re:A real comparison? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how often do you voluntarily get in the car for 410/70 = 6 hour + trips? If your employment requires it or you have relatives you want to visit that are that far away, fine. Most Americans, that isn't the case.

    88. Re:A real comparison? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      This is a fixable problem.

    89. Re:A real comparison? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I've owned two Chrysler products for the last four years, and have had completely the opposite experience. And that's after having dealt with Infiniti & BMW service just prior.

      Anecdotes != evidence.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    90. Re:A real comparison? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Dealers get paid by the factories for warranty work.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    91. Re:A real comparison? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      You know the battery lasts maybe 150k miles*, right? How much driving do you plan to do every year? Battery replacement is about $150 a kwh.

      * For lithium cobalt batteries, which is what these use, you can do ~1000 cycles at 80% depth of discharge. So multiple range by 0.8 and assume you can do that about 1000 times.

    92. Re:A real comparison? by chooks · · Score: 1

      As someone who'd love an electric car, I'm already out of the running with a family of four children. I don't have the cash for a "second" car - it make better financial sense for me to spend that cash on gasoline.

      You can get nice off-lease EVs for dirt cheap, low miles, and excellent battery conditions. I bought a 2013 Nissan Leaf for around 9K that was essentially in mint condition. It's not a Tesla, but for my 3 mile commute each way, it does the trick nicely (and the charger at work is a nice bonus in minimizing my overall costs).

      The problem though is size -- especially with 4 kids in the picture. My wife and I have the short range cheap commuting car (the Leaf) and a long range ICE cross-over. Works great so far and has been easy on the wallet.

      I wasn't sure about the whole EV thing, but now having one I love it (and the way they drive/handle -- its very much a fun car to drive)

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    93. Re:A real comparison? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you've had to drive a hybrid for 13 years.

      Money isn't everything.

    94. Re:A real comparison? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Toyota Echo, 207K, just needed to replace the idler pulley. Original engine, burns a little oil but not much, smog compliant. I expect to run this thing up to 300K. Cars can go past 150 depending on the car and how it's taken care of.

    95. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will save more in maintenance actions than on gasoline. No motor oil or filters, no valves to tune up, no drive shafts to grease, no ATF, no hydraulic power steering system (I'm assuming Tesla's are electric power steering) no vacuum leaks, no exhaust system parts (muffler, cat, EGR, exhaust manifold). The PbSO4 starter battery doesn't have to be replaced every 3 years either. I'm unsure if Tesla's use ethylene glycol based battery coolant or not (assuming yes), but I would wager the amount of coolant is either less or the coolant path is much simpler with fewer places to leak than that of an ICE (water pump, radiator, radiator core, etc.).

      These things add up like crazy. Plus, emissions testing is not free in some places where it is mandatory--fixing emissions issues definitely isn't free either even if your vehicle otherwise works fine.

    96. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Bumble Fuck Egyptian, I highly resent your comment... Go BF University!

    97. Re:A real comparison? by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Replacing a battery isn't cheap but it is a very very straightforward thing. Unlike replacing an engine, which your transmission isn't engineered for.

      What pile-of-shit ICE cars are people buying that need new engines/gearboxes/clutches every few years? Are you using a time machine to go back to the 1970s and buy the lemons they made then? Or are you basing your experience on cars that were already 8 years old when you bought them?...and on what planet are Teslas etc. zero maintenance?

      My last car survived 12 years or so of my less-than-tender care & imperfect clutch-work (whats this I hear about oil changes?) and was running perfectly when I got rid of it (but someone re-modelled the rear and it wasn't worth fixing). One before that got so old that things like door catches were breaking (a more can-do mechanical person than me would have got another 5 years out of it). Before that: 2CVs with indestructible mechanics (and only slight tendency to explode) but, sadly, water-soluble bodywork. Current car 6 years old and nary more than an oil change. OK, so my gran used 3 packets of anecdotal evidence every day and she lived to be 96, but I don't get the impression that my experience is that unusual.

      Most of my maintenance bills have been for tyres, wipers, windscreen chips, Air Con recharges etc. Last time I looked, EVs have all of those. I'll give you that an EV with regenerative braking probably goes through less brake pads. I'm sure Ludicrous Mode takes its toll on the tyres, though...

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    98. Re:A real comparison? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      That's crazy talk. I can remember my father talking about how in his cars, if the engine hit 100K it was toast. Now we continually go over 200 with few issues.

    99. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way nay responsible mechanic would change oil every 10,000 miles unless their car was basically powering a generator or on a dyno all day, while both were being run in a clean room (exception: a low speed diesel with a generous oil reserve). Even for 5000-7500 mile intervals the user manual specifies driving conditions that are definitely not what the typical customer does on a daily basis.

      Even going to Jiffy Lube, including the change in your trip path, the wait in line, and the time to pay takes longer than 20 minutes. Their time guarantee doesn't cover those three items either...

    100. Re: A real comparison? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It is vastly simpler, yes. But it's still a "transmission", so you were technically incorrect. Additionally, just like any gearbox, it has oil which needs to be changed periodically.

      The whole failure thing is really pretty silly: it's pretty uncommon these days for modern, complicated automatic transmissions to fail before the car's useful life is over. Cars just don't have the mechanical problems they used to, unless they're horribly undermaintained, or wrecked.

    101. Re:A real comparison? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You change your oil monthly?? my last complete oil change was $34, and that was after four months.

    102. Re:A real comparison? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Maybe I shouldn't have said "end of service life". What I meant was, around 150k-200k, the probability of needing an engine rebuild or transmission replacement rises sharply. The fact that your Toyota Echo hasn't needed either is no evidence whatsoever of the average case.

    103. Re:A real comparison? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      If he charges it at home, there are no trips to the gas station or the EV charging station at all. Many people use their cars in ways that will rarely or never require a stop at a charging station; they are good candidates for electric cars. Some people regularly use their cars for long road trips; at present they are not good candidates.

      If you are a two (or more) car family, it's rare for both cars to be needed for long road trips at the same time. If one of your two cars is an electric, you can trade cars if necessary when the person who is the regular driver of the electric car goes on a trip.

    104. Re:A real comparison? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The Chevy Bolt will already be available. Nissan is surely working on an extended range version of the Leaf. VW is known to be working on electric cars. You should have a number of choices in the upcoming years.

    105. Re:A real comparison? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      No, the laptop costs more because it costs more to make. The CPU is slower, but that's because it's a part that is optimized for low voltage and low power consumption; it's no cheaper to make than a desktop CPU. The physical construction of the laptop costs more; it's more complex due to the need for miniaturization and minimizing of weight. The laptop probably has a smaller hard disk, but any given amount of capacity costs more in the smaller 2.5" size than in a 3.5" drive. (Or the laptop may have an SSD, which for now is still more costly.) And the price comparison is often a false one; when you buy a desktop computer you have to buy the keyboard and monitor separately, but those components are included in a laptop purchase.

    106. Re:A real comparison? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The manufacturing cost of the Bolt and the Volt probably aren't all that far apart. The Bolt has a bigger battery, but the Volt has the additional complications of a gas engine and a very complex transmission. Chevy plans to continue to make the Volt (for those who need a car that can be driven on long trips) as well as introducing the Bolt.

    107. Re:A real comparison? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could offer an option where you got free use of the Superchargers - but only when you are more than a certain distance from home. So it would be for road trips, not for everyday use.

    108. Re:A real comparison? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      They deliberately located Saturn away from other divisions of GM because they wanted the company to be able to develop its own corporate culture. As a startup experiment that was probably worthwhile; as a long term business model it was problematic.

      The problem that GM faced is that it DID develop a different culture, one that was totally incompatible with the way the rest of GM ran. The two could not continue to exist in the same corporation forever. They could have changed Saturn to be like the rest of GM, which is what they did, but it cost them all the carefully developed brand loyalty that Saturn had built and made the division irrelevant. Or they could have tried to change the rest of GM to be like Saturn, but that would have been a far more difficult job. Changing an entrenched culture is far more difficult than developing a new one from scratch. That change would have had to happen not only at the company's own plants, but at its dealers and among the labor unions. And they would have had to educate their customers to stop expecting discounts and rebates when they bought cars, and instead be happy with buying the car for a fair fixed price.

    109. Re:A real comparison? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      You must not have known the right people. I knew at least four Saturn owners who LOVED their Saturns, one of whom was my late wife. Those were all Saturns from the glory days of the company in the late 90s. All of them ended up buying something else when it came time to replace them; two because the brand had stopped making cars that they wanted to buy, the other two because Saturn was gone before they bought new cars. Saturns from that era were well made and reliable and the dealer support was excellent, but things went downhill later when GM abandoned all the things that had made Saturn special and tried to turn it into just another GM brand.

    110. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. If you regularly drive 400+ miles in one trip (and assuming it's just back and forth between two destinations), you should buy 3 electric cars so that there will always be one car fully charged at each destination.

      How about this. Get three electric cars. On long trips, you are driving one of the three while your assistant is towing the other two in a Ford F-150 pickup (650+ mile range properly equipped). Battery dies, swap out the car. :-)

    111. Re: A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your car cost us the taxpayers $30k.

    112. Re:A real comparison? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      At a very low rate.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    113. Re:A real comparison? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They deliberately located Saturn away from other divisions of GM because they wanted the company to be able to develop its own corporate culture. As a startup experiment that was probably worthwhile; as a long term business model it was problematic.

      I'm sorry, that still doesn't make any sense. The US is a big, big place. They could have located it in many, many other places that weren't too near other GM divisions, but were near existing ports or rail terminals. There's plenty of places in California that would have met this requirement, but also many other places too, such as places in the Midwest where there's rail nearby for shipping grain and other agricultural products, or perhaps West Virginia where there's rail for shipping coal, or just about any place in the northeast where there's lots of rail and the ports of Boston and New York are nearby, or somewhere along the Gulf Coast such as Gulfport MS or Tallahassee FL. You don't have to locate a company in some puny little town in rural Tennessee to have independence from the auto industry; it's a big employer in this country, but not *that* big. There's a huge number of places in this country which don't have any auto industry presence yet are near ports or rail.

    114. Re:A real comparison? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > By my calculation, I'll save about $1000 / year on energy costs

      Curious what prices are like where you live? You do realize Tesla isn't planning on giving Super charger access to the Model 3's? Teslas calculator shows 70 miles on national average $.13 /kwhr will be on a 110V charger $4 to go 70 miles. National average is $2.20 per gallon @ 35 mpg = $4.40 to go 70 miles in the honda. To save $1000 you would have to go through 2500 gallons of gas, so 85000 miles a year. You'll have likely gone through 5 Tesla battery's before you save $10k.

      Even at $4 a gallon, your saving maybe $2 a gallon, so 500 gallons or 17,500 miles a year. Well over the national average. You'll be pushing the battery life to the absolute max driving the Tesla 175,000 miles before you save your $10k.

      For at least the next 5 years, electric will still be tied to petroleum prices, so it is very unlikely electric prices won't also nearly double if gas does.

      Right now I am at $.18 for electric, and $1.85 per gallon. My 40 MPG motorcycle is about $300 cheaper per year for fuel than the Tesla would be (at my current rates.) A Prius would do even better.

    115. Re:A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      the AC has a point...to a point anyway.

      There are competing interests. Longer lifespan of cars...and selling more cars. Every part manufacturer could build a more robust widget for not that significantly more cost. But if that part never needs replacing, that's at least 1 lost sale for that small increase. And because cheaper makers will undercut you, there isn't the incentive for the added cost for longer reliability; except in really niche markets.

      What's happening now is what you say...every car made today is significantly better than 40 years ago. And it's costing sales numbers as cars last 10-15 years vs 6-10. When its 20? LOTS harder to be in the auto business.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    116. Re:A real comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha... It's so funny because he misspelled the word "car" -- oh, I'm dying here 'cause it's so darned clever...

    117. Re:A real comparison? by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      My 18-year-old Honda CRV reached 305K recently. Never spent a cent apart from oil changes, filter changes, tires etc.

    118. Re:A real comparison? by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      You don't buy them to save money. You buy them to help change the world.

      Well that and... they are really cool silent vehicles. And you don't stink like gasoline or stand outside your car in the cold and rain while filling it.

      Never forget: gasoline is a pretty gross liquid and isn't fun on your skin and clothes.

    119. Re:A real comparison? by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      the AC has a point...to a point anyway.

      I mostly agree with you except about that. I don't think he really did have a point. I should have quoted him, but he said:

      average car lifetime has gone down by more than a factor of 2 in the last fifty years

      Now, maybe it was a typo and he meant that the lifetime went UP by a factor of 2, but I don't think that's what he meant, given the rest of what he wrote. So, I still totally disagree with his posting...

      Every part manufacturer could build a more robust widget for not that significantly more cost. But if that part never needs replacing, that's at least 1 lost sale for that small increase. And because cheaper makers will undercut you, there isn't the incentive for the added cost for longer reliability; except in really niche markets.

      I think this was true to some degree in the 50s,60s,70s. But the Japanese manufacturers really got into the quality thing and we saw them build extremely reliable machines. It really was an amazing turn around - Japan had previously been known for junk and they really became (and still are) the gold standard of reliability (or at least Honda and Toyota are).

      It's interesting to examine planned obsolescence, because I don't really believe that's what we're seeing in automobiles today. There is a subtle difference between designing parts to a finite lifetime because to design the part for a longer lifetime would cost more, or weigh more, or have some other negative engineering side effect, and designing the part to have a worse lifetime on purpose to help foster replacement. I also tend to think that planned obsolescence is only for markets which have basically gotten the engineering to "good enough". As long as manufacturers can improve the product in a meaningful way, people will continue to upgrade. When your washing machine gets your clothes perfectly clean, in minimum time, using minimum water, etc. etc., what is the incentive to upgrade? That's when planned obsolescence becomes necessary to keep sales going. Wikipedia says:

      Planned obsolescence or built-in obsolescence in industrial design and economics is a policy of planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life, so it will become obsolete (that is, unfashionable or no longer functional) after a certain period of time.[1] The rationale behind the strategy is to generate long-term sales volume by reducing the time between repeat purchases (referred to as "shortening the replacement cycle").[2]

      That's not the same as saying, "let's use more plastic parts over metal to reduce the cost of this machine". That's a more legitimate marketplace strategy. Planned obsolescence says "ok, you have a great part there Mr. Engineer, but we need this engine to throw a rod every 60,000 miles on average so that the owner will replace the car. Make the walls of the part a little thinner so that it will fail more frequently". Of course it's probably not usually so blatant. It's most likely that the manufacturer tries to reduce the price/weight/whatever and... the fact that the reliability went down is okay, wink wink.

      If you think about it, that's exactly the opposite of what the Japanese did (and what Miele claims to do, but Miele doesn't really pull it off). They analyzed how their cars and their assembly lines fail, identify the weakness, and address it. That's how we got from 60,000 mile to 300,000 mile cars. The thing is, that as long as they are doing that, nobody else can do planned obsolescence via reliability of their cars, because if a Honda Civic will go 300,000 miles, but your Volkswagen will only go 60,000 miles, you won't sell many Volkswagens.

      For the last decade, cars have been on a trajectory of increased computer connectivity and gadgets, increased safety via more and more airbags (and better chassis design for survivability) and more power (in 2005 my 305 hp Subaru was one of the most p

    120. Re:A real comparison? by Toshito · · Score: 1

      In my personal experience (more than 20 years driving and owning cars), the great majority of repairs I had to make to my cars where to the suspension (mostly ball joints, shocks, etc.), direction (universal joints, steering rack), brakes (seized calipers, leaking brake lines, etc.), and electronic/electrical stuff (all sorts of shorts, burned electric motors for windows regulators, problems with switches, door locks, etc.)

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but current electrical cars still have the same suspension, brake and direction parts. And they have way more electrical stuff.

      And the biggest problem for the longevity of cars (at least where I live) is rust. Now explain to me how an electrical car will be magically protected from rust? They're still build with a steel unibody and steel body panels?

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    121. Re:A real comparison? by Toshito · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live and what you do for a living, but our family, with 2 very good salaries (we both work in IT, for major canadian banks, with more than 30 years of combined experience) and 4 kids, would never be able to afford a 35000 US$ car.

      For us it's still in luxury car pricing.

      For les than half of this price, we bough a brand new 7 passengers SUV...

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    122. Re:A real comparison? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Of course it has those possible problems. What it doesn't have is all the other problems associated with the ICE and associated parts. Water pumps, clutches, timing belts, etc.

      The electrical nature is a fair point, but also something modern cars have in abundance themselves these days.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    123. Re:A real comparison? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Because Trump. Or Clinton.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  2. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see how the Bolt is even a competitor to anything that Tesla makes, when you exclude the price. There are a number of factors that make the Bolt inferior, which range from its build quality, given that it is a Chevrolet, to the lack of nation-wide supercharger stations to the dealer-centric ordering process.

    1. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they haven't killed any drivers.

    2. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, amazing feat when it is not even out yet...
      If you are talking about Chevrolet in general, they should have "killed" more than Tesla of course...

    3. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there's some form of sponsorship involved here.
      this is just a poorly veiled at trying to look like news

    4. Re:Ridiculous by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Except build quality on tesla has not been that great. CU rescinded their recommendation it had so many problems even though they loved the car. Another quote I saw from a woman who owned an X was she would never tolerate the level of problems in her Escalade she had with her X. And from what I have read the X is truly a piece of crap. The S is basically middle of the road reliability.

    5. Re:Ridiculous by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      The defense I've heard of the Tesla issues is that while they do exist, the VAST majority of them are software fixes that are downloaded and installed while it's parked in your garage at night.

      Lets see the Escalade do that ;-)

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    6. Re: Ridiculous by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Early production X had door alignment problems. All fixed now plus software update.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    7. Re: Ridiculous by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      You forgot double vision windshield, 3rd row seats folding in a crash, windows won't open or close. That was just the first article I read from wired. I would have thought slashdot readers could use google. Guess I was wrong.

    8. Re: Ridiculous by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Early production. All fixed.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    9. Re: Ridiculous by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You forgot to point out that the Porsche Mission E hasn't killed anyone yet, either.

    10. Re: Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think all of the Slashdot readers are fixed.

  3. Most from the least by SNRatio · · Score: 1

    It gets down to my product ideas of balance and getting the most from the least. Try to make things simple and affordable but very adequate.

    I'd love to see more MPG stats on flywheel vs battery hybrids. Flywheels are much more efficient, but realistically have much lower energy storage capacity than batteries. Flywheels, CVT, and a small engine might be a way to get the most from the least $ right now: the Bolt's battery costs GM about $9k.

    1. Re:Most from the least by guises · · Score: 1

      They're using flywheels in cars? How does that work? Flywheels have to be massive to function, cars need to be light to be efficient.

      Not to mention the danger of having a flywheel in a moving object that's prone to crashing. I mean, I get that the car itself has a lot of kinetic energy when it's moving, but the flywheel has to have even more if it's the thing that's pushing the car.

    2. Re:Most from the least by mysidia · · Score: 1

      They're using flywheels in cars? How does that work?

      I personally prefer Unicorn-powered cars. The range between refuelings is much much higher, they never need to be replaced, and there's practically zero maintenance required..

    3. Re:Most from the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they alpine meadow raised unicorns?

    4. Re:Most from the least by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      Flywheels sometimes ARE used in hybrid sports cars ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ), but certainly not in anything for everyday road use.

    5. Re:Most from the least by SNRatio · · Score: 2

      For hybrids they don't have to by massive. Volvo tested a 6 kg one in an S60: the extra 80 hp meant a 0-60 time of 5.5 seconds. The flywheels are typically made out of carbon fiber composites that pretty much turn into dust if the vacuum chamber gets busted in an accident, so there isn't much shrapnel.

    6. Re:Most from the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very easily: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy_recovery_system

      Ingenious little system.

    7. Re:Most from the least by SNRatio · · Score: 1

      Volvo tested one in an S60: http://www.extremetech.com/ext... .It would be interesting to see results from a system with enough storage capacity so that the engine only runs at optimum output to spin up the flywheel and is otherwise shut off, similar to electric hybrids where the engine only powers an alternator and isn't mechanically connected to the wheels. Large systems might need to be two separate flywheels spinning in opposite directions though - otherwise having a giant gyroscope in the car could make handling "interesting".

    8. Re:Most from the least by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Don't know what's actually being used, but I recall 10-20 years ago reading about flywheels being made to target cars - small, but spun at truly insane speeds while magnetically suspended in vacuum. Made from wound carbon fiber so that they wouldn't rip themselves apart under normal operation - and if they *did* come apart, they basically vaporized, with individual fragments too small to penetrate the casing.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:Most from the least by guises · · Score: 1

      Well, that is super interesting. Thanks.

    10. Re:Most from the least by guises · · Score: 1

      Well okay then, that's pretty neat. It does seem like a bursty thing though - the link the other person gave had 80 hp for six seconds. That's a supplement to batteries rather than a replacement. Could make a fine replacement for a super capacitor maybe.

    11. Re:Most from the least by dattaway · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen a commercially sold flywheel anything?

    12. Re:Most from the least by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Large systems might need to be two separate flywheels spinning in opposite directions though - otherwise having a giant gyroscope in the car could make handling "interesting".

      Shouldn't make a difference if it's on a vertical axis. In fact it would reduce body roll in a sharp turn. But batteries still seem to be the simpler and more robust option on the long term. Who needs all those extra rapidly spinning moving parts?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    13. Re:Most from the least by guises · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is pretty slick.

    14. Re:Most from the least by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 0

      Flywheels don't serve the right purpose for a common car. They act more like regenerative brakes that store a small amount of energy that is re-used in a short amount of time. So if you are accelerating and decelerating rapidly, you might be able to conserve fuel and get an acceleration boost which might make sense in certain race situations. But for a normal consumer vehicle, you want more power stored to be used over a longer period of time, and to retain its energy even while the vehicle is not in use for long periods of time. Batteries make more sense for that purpose.

    15. Re:Most from the least by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I suppose a flywheel could also be used to store up energy from a small ICE engine, that would provide an acceleration boost but not help much with range.

    16. Re:Most from the least by SNRatio · · Score: 1
      But for now, flywheels are more robust than batteries when it comes total # of charge cycles, and lighter for an equivalent amount of torque. For regenerative braking flywheels can be much more efficient than batteries.

      In the end it may only make sense for vehicles that frequently need to generate/absorb massive amounts of torque, like race cars and buses. But for trucks hydraulic hybrids might be even better.

    17. Re:Most from the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The smaller engine you could get away with in that circumstance would help with the range.

    18. Re:Most from the least by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      But do they get along well with the hundreds of horses living under the hood?

    19. Re:Most from the least by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The requirement that the driver be a virgin is fine for most users here, but in the real world...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    20. Re:Most from the least by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I personally prefer Unicorn-powered cars.... they never need to be replaced, and there's practically zero maintenance required..

      You have to tap their vascular system if you want to make use of their power. They're not going to last forever, they may live thousands of years in the wild, but being strapped to a car with their blood draining out? No. You're going to need to catch a new one every few years, talk about a time sink.

      And if you don't think any maintenance is involved, you just don't realize what all that rainbow-colored sherbet squirting everywhere really is. I'll give you a hint, it isn't a laser light show. And it will eat right through your paint job, and even etch your windshield.

    21. Re:Most from the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. How do you know "Flywheels are much more efficient" if you don't have MPG stats to compare?

      A car isn't like a building, there is a major penalty associated with hauling all the weight in a flywheel around.

    22. Re:Most from the least by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      In principle, with a flywheel made of carbon nanotubes and electromagnetic bearings, you can get high energy density. That's just in theory. Yes, it's a bad idea in cars - the shifts in acceleration and the angular momentum of the rotating mass mean it's a bad plan. Also, yeah, when flywheels fail they explode, and the pieces for 100k rpm high energy density ones are like shrapnel from a bomb.

      It might work out for stationary energy storage, where you can bury the flywheels underground or in concrete vaults. But not cars.

      With actual existing flywheels you can buy now, their cost efficiency is shit and their energy per mass is shit. The advantage is that if they use electromagnetic bearings and a vacuum chamber, there are no physical parts in contact. So their service life is almost forever - the parts that will fail are the electronics, which you can install outside the flywheel container and replace. You can weld shut the flywheel cannister so the vacuum doesn't leak, either.

      This is their one advantage - you can charge and discharge and charge and discharge all damn day and they won't experience any wear. It's used for power factor correction by the power companies for this reason.

    23. Re:Most from the least by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      So far as I know, nobody has put a flywheel car into production. They probably don't make sense for most private car owners because the flywheel runs down while the car is parked. (Nobody has made a perfectly frictionless one and never will.) But you are correct that if they are spun up and used right away, they are more efficient at storing energy than batteries are. Flywheels are more likely to make sense for taxis and transit vehicles because they remain in continuous use for a large number of hours each day.

    24. Re:Most from the least by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't make a difference if it's on a vertical axis. In fact it would reduce body roll in a sharp turn.

      Not convinced. It'll turn easier with the spin rather than away from it.

      And you'll always get precession. What you avoid on turns you'll have as you go over a humpbacked bridge or up a ramp.

      Maybe smart power steering could compensate, but at first glance I prefer the contra-rotation idea.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:Most from the least by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      And you'll always get precession.

      Not if you're rotating about the same axis as the gyro. You are not applying any force to it. And since no torque is being applied to the frame, it won't matter which direction you are turning. The body roll would change the front/rear balance for a short time and front/aft tilting would make vehicle roll left and right a bit. You can prove all that stuff with a bicycle wheel. And if this is a truck or bus you're talking about. You won't notice it. It's bad enough you have one rapidly rotating part ready to blow up any second, why put in two? I still prefer using dangerous caustic chemicals with as few moving parts as possible. If we ever build super capacitors, all the better.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  4. How I decide what car to buy... by DogDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I'm trying to decide which car I should buy, the first people I look to are billionaires. Since their lifestyles and mine are so similar, and since they're obviously so much smarter than I am, I just assume that their decisions are the correct ones.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by sid+crimson · · Score: 1

      When I'm trying to decide which car I should buy, the first people I look to are billionaires. Since their lifestyles and mine are so similar, and since they're obviously so much smarter than I am, I just assume that their decisions are the correct ones.

      Steve Wozniak is no billionaire
      But to your point, his ~$100mil net work means he can purchase scores of bleeding edge lemons and still have enough left over for the emergency uber ride or two.

    2. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No such net worth. Working very hard to support my family. Had needed house mortgage 5 years ago. I feel uncomfortable with money. I have a Tesla because we like road trips and no other EV would suffice. I will try the Bolt out. There are things I like about it. The car of my life, so far, was the Prius, which I drove for 10 years. The headline is more about me than about Tesla or Bolt.

    3. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The car of my life, so far, was the Prius

      That's just sad.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re: How I decide what car to buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woz? Is that you?

    5. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by swillden · · Score: 1

      The car of my life, so far, was the Prius

      That's just sad.

      What's wrong with the Prius? It's reasonably-priced, reliable, comfortable, quiet, efficient transportation. I don't own one, but it's my vehicle of choice when I'm renting a car.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's wrong with the Prius?

      It's boring. It doesn't drive smoothly (the transitions between modes are not good -- at least on the gen 2 Prius that I drove).

      Fundamentally, there is nothing wrong with it, but it is not exciting to drive. If your ideal car is merely an appliance that gets you from A to B, then it's OK.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    7. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem with them is how heavy they are. They wallow around corners, acceleration is atrocious and stopping distances are massive. They're also not a good car for motorway/highway driving because they can't use the electric motor over 50mph, but as the petrol motor is small and underpowered for the weight (remember a Prius is about 400kg heavier than similar sized cars) they're not economical at that speed. At 70mph you'd be better off in almost any other modern car.

      They may be good for many people, but I'd say pure electric is a better option for more.

    8. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      My toothbrush isn't exciting either, but I don't look for one with racing stripes. For many people, a boring car that reliably gets them from exciting place A to exciting place B is exactly what they want.

    9. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but people don't keep a note of which was their "toothbrush of their life".

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    10. Re:How I decide what car to buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My toothbrush isn't exciting either, but I don't look for one with racing stripes. For many people, a boring car that reliably gets them from exciting place A to exciting place B is exactly what they want.

      Go back and look at this thread. Are you honestly saying you have a "toothbrush of your life", then that is truly a sad thing.

  5. Steve Wozniak this, Steve Wozniak that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you have enough of him?

    1. Re: Steve Wozniak this, Steve Wozniak that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Wozniak, Wozniak, Wozniak, Wozniak! When is "Being Steve Wozniak" being released?

    2. Re:Steve Wozniak this, Steve Wozniak that by quenda · · Score: 1

      I love to hear Wozniak's opinions on many things. But cars is not one.

      From TFA:

      Woz noted he’s owned several Detroit vehicles — a Buick, a couple of Pintos, and one current member of his fleet, a Hummer.

      This is not an area where Woz's judgement or taste should be emulated.

    3. Re:Steve Wozniak this, Steve Wozniak that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weren't you the one who submitted the story to slashdot?

  6. Obvious question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And in response to the obvious question, Woz replied "Maybe one Segway would fit. And a seat can be folded down."

    I'm trying to see the obvious here, but all I can come up with is "Do you have any random comments? About the car, life, universe or anything?"

    1. Re:Obvious question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42

    2. Re:Obvious question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he is a Segway fan.

  7. Huh? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0
    Seems to be a new clickbait trend here, Wozniak coming out and being a contrarian, as if that means anything. If the lad wants a Bolt instead of a Tesla, I think that's great, and as long as he is happy, more power to him.

    Can't say I care at all tho, other than to note the silly trend in Woz stories. If Chevy made a 4WD offroad capable Bolt, I'd have one. Same with Tesla. That's why we have different manufacturers - who knew?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  8. No infrastructure comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Still waiting on infrastructure. GM isn't investing, and CCS chargers generally seem to have much lower availability than Tesla charging stations. By the looks of that map I could drive from Toronto to Montreal hopping between superchargers; I can't do that with a Bolt and CCS, it's a complete dead zone between here and there.

    Electric still seems kind of niche unless it's a second car or you never leave the city, in any case.

    1. Re:No infrastructure comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still waiting on infrastructure. GM isn't investing, and CCS chargers generally seem to have much lower availability than Tesla charging stations. By the looks of that map I could drive from Toronto to Montreal hopping between superchargers; I can't do that with a Bolt and CCS, it's a complete dead zone between here and there.

      Electric still seems kind of niche unless it's a second car or you never leave the city, in any case.

      "Second car that never leaves the city" that's probably most second cars, and there's a lot of them.

  9. Flywheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flywheel instead of battery? You realize we are talking about real life cars, right, not your Hot Wheels...

    1. Re:Flywheel? by SNRatio · · Score: 1

      Flywheel instead of battery? You realize we are talking about real life cars, right, not your Hot Wheels...

      I'm not sure if Le Mans and Formula One cars should go in the Hot Wheels category or real life, but a bunch of them have been flywheel hybrids for the past few years.

    2. Re:Flywheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy_recovery_system

      Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.
      -- ABRAHAM LINCOLN.

  10. Good! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

    The entire point of Tesla was not to dominate the market for EVs, it was to make EVs a real thing that people could buy. With multiple companies making affordable EVs, it means that Tesla is succeeding in its goal. This is a good thing!

    The only thing left is to edge gasoline vehicles out of the market and move energy generation to something renewable.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Good! by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      The entire point of Tesla was not to dominate the market for EVs, it was to make EVs a real thing that people could buy.

      It was to make EVs a real thing that people would buy. We had affordable EVs before, but they were not cool enough for people who like cars and too expensive for people who didn't care.
      Tesla actually went the opposite way, by making a luxury car that's fun to drive at about twice the price of other EVs. What they managed to do is to make EVs cool, but not more affordable. And at the same time they positioned themselves as the coolest manufacturer of the cool electric cars.

      As for their true goal, I can tell you that it is green, but the kind that is printed on paper. What do you think they are? Charity?

  11. Remind me... by x0ra · · Score: 1

    Why is Wozniak's opinion relevant ?

    1. Re: Remind me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For the same reason why anytime Musk makes a comment about anything is front page here.

      Or Gates. Or Cook. Or Bezos.....

      We bald apes consider those people to be our alphas.

    2. Re: Remind me... by ITRambo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Praise be to those that are wealthy. If we do what they say, we'll be just like them someday.

    3. Re: Remind me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be sure that the next time Steve Jobs makes a comment, it will be worthy of being headline news.

    4. Re:Remind me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. "Linus is right" (about anything) is a popular observation on /., but "Woz is right" not so much. I guess he's not as big a hero.

    5. Re: Remind me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more thing...

    6. Re: Remind me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair about this, aside from Cook everyone listed there has had real tangible success. You translate it as wealth, that's on you. Other people would like to make such a mark on history and the stories of those who have done so is valued because of potential insights.

    7. Re: Remind me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only mark I'm leaving is the ripped asshole you'll have after I pull my cock out!

  12. New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8y9PQ8Z0T04Es1uwFV6biA

  13. Electric Cars serve two purposes by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    First, if you've got one in most major cities there's an EV/Carpool lane on the freeways you get to use. So if you've got the scratch for one you can cut your commute in half. Second, a lot of the emissions regulations are based on car companies having/selling a certain amount of low or (in this case) zero emission vehicles. This lets car companies sell gas guzzlers like the Charger/Impala and still meet the regs. The extra cost is (mostly) offset by tax incentives (e.g. you and me paying for it).

    As usual, the most cynical answer is correct. Is there a law for that?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Electric Cars serve two purposes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said gas guzzler and thought Impala? That is probably one of the most gas efficient vehicles around. And also one of the oldest continuous US names.

    2. Re: Electric Cars serve two purposes by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      You don't get to say the name is continuous if the previous incarnation of an Impala was a guzzling rear wheel beast of a car. Sure the current one is a 'normal' car, but it's not an Impala other than name.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    3. Re:Electric Cars serve two purposes by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      The carpool exemption is coming to an end. It's a federal rule that ends when the roadway is classified as 'degraded' in traffic flow. I-66 HOV in VA is losing the Hybrid/Electric/Special fuel exemption in 2017.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    4. Re: Electric Cars serve two purposes by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Car companies have to buy guzzler credits from Tesla. No tax money.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:Electric Cars serve two purposes by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      The carpool exemption is coming to an end. It's a federal rule that ends when the roadway is classified as 'degraded' in traffic flow. I-66 HOV in VA is losing the Hybrid/Electric/Special fuel exemption in 2017.

      In CA, carpool access for pure EVs (and hydrogen vehicles) is guaranteed until early 2019.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:Electric Cars serve two purposes by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      An inflatable doll still costs about $30 and gets you carpool lane access.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Electric Cars serve two purposes by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Some people assume that is true, but cops work a lot of hours and have trouble maintaining a social life... if he owns the same model doll and recognizes her, he won't be amused. At all.

    8. Re: Electric Cars serve two purposes by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      ... oldest continuous US names

      You seem to have trouble parsing the phrase you commented on. He didn't write "oldest continuous car lines", he wrote "names". Or, in other words, you agreed with him, but made it sound like an argument because you're too stupid to realize you said the same thing.

  14. Two somewhat different audiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bolt: eco
    Tesla: ego

  15. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the other Steve is dead, wonder how long before Apple hires this Steve (or tries to).

    I mean if their best idea is "Courage" for removing the analog headphone jack

    1. Re:So... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I don't know, are they ready to acknowledge the top engineers on the Apple II?

  16. I wouldn't buy a Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hired a Tesla Model S with Insane mode for a day so I could properly try it out and do all the things one does with a car in normal use. While it does feel like driving a spaceship and is absolutely phenomenal performance-wise, I'm not going to buy one for a number of reasons. Chiefly, the user interface is atrocious and it's impossible to safely do anything with the main screen unless you are pulled over. I also found the rear seats to be very low and hard to get in and out of and Tesla's paint color options are sad.

    I'm looking forward to hiring a Bolt for a day so I can properly try it out as well.

    Ideally, I'd get a Tesla drivetrain in a BMW or Mercedes coach.

    1. Re:I wouldn't buy a Tesla by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Ideally, I'd get a Tesla drivetrain in a BMW or Mercedes coach.

      Better yet, a Checker Marathon

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. I test drove one as well and the touchscreen panel in the car is a dealbreaker for me, and frankly I am shocked these are allowed on the road. I do not feel safe with other drivers having this. It's no different than playing with an ipad while driving. Touchscreens might make sense for cell phones, but in a car you *need* the tactile feedback from physical buttons so your eyes can focus on the fucking road.

    3. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Please don't reply to yourself. Thanks!

    4. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Is it any worse than the UConnect in vehicles? The reason my touch screen doesn't feel that dangerous is:
      1. you can augment the touch with voice commands and physical buttons located on the steering wheel and dash
      2. The touch screen buttons are huge for the few things you might need it for
      3. typing (and reading text messages) is disabled if you're moving, you can only talk and have it text-to-speech messages to you
      4. From the home screen there's pretty much nothing that requires more than four taps. I counted it one day. Does the Tesla one have levels of nested menus or something?

      Obviously you don't mess with it when there's other cars around but it doesn't seem any more distracting than trying to find a toll ticket or a not-yet-empty water bottle in a cupholder...

    5. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      or a not-yet-empty water bottle in a cupholder...

      My advice, look up the word "tactile." I don't think you understood the complaint, or that many of us don't look away from the road even long enough for one non-tactile interaction, much less to navigate a menu.

      You're probably one of those magical beings that knows everything that is around your car, even while you're fiddling with the center console, because gosh, it was "all clear" last time you looked up! I hope I'm not the one coming the other way when you come around a corner and cross the center line, but all I can do is hope.

    6. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. Sorry about that.

    7. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Silly, if I was approaching a corner without looking in front of me, I'd be careening off the road. You don't stare at the thing, you look down for less than a second, make your selection, back to the road, back to the console to see the next screen of huge icons... and only do it on straight road (ideally limited access highways). It's less dangerous than the multitasking you have to do when merging, as in that case you (should be!) turning your whole head away from the front to see if there's anyone in your blind spot, as well as checking both mirrors.

      Your comment makes me more concerned that *you* don't have a good grasp on when it is and isn't ok to look away from the road. And clearly the NTSB sides with me on this, because otherwise these devices wouldn't be allowed.

    8. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      And clearly the NTSB sides with me on this, because otherwise these devices wouldn't be allowed.

      LMFAO! OR, they don't even make those rules, your state does. Derp-y Dan always has the gubermint on his side, and he knows it, because he already knows he's right so the Authoritays must agree because they're smaht and stuff.

    9. Re: I wouldn't buy a Tesla by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      The NTSB makes recommendations and the states make the laws which back them up.

      Judging by the tone of your response, I've realized you're simply projecting your own inability to walk and chew gum onto the rest of the populace, and on this particular topic there is no need to engage further.

  17. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can anyone place their trust in a BMS from a company that just had to recall 4.3 million vehicles because they cannot even write reliable software to control their airbags and seat belts?

  18. about that "competing" thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EV will compete head-to-head with the Tesla Model 3.

    Not when the Tesla has a nationwide network of charging stations that dwarves anything the Chevy can use, it won't.

    Not when it comes with "Chevy quality" (cough gag), it won't.

    Not when the Tesla looks like this, and the Chevy looks like this, it won't.

    Not when it costs a few thousand dollars more for an inferior car, it won't.

    GM, you keep using this word "compete". I don't think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re: about that "competing" thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. While the Tesla is ugly, it isn't nearly as ugly as the Bolt.

    2. Re:about that "competing" thing... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Tesla may look nicer, but the Bolt's body style looks a lot more functional and space efficient.

      As far as Tesla quality, we really don't know what they will deliver when mass producing a much cheaper vehicle. And from what I've read on some financial reviews, there is a good chance that the Tesla will cost more than initially suggested.

    3. Re:about that "competing" thing... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      There's no way Tesla will meet their cost targets unless they want to take a loss. First, their manufacturing facility is thousands of miles from existing manufacturing base. Suppliers may be able to produce the parts rather cheaply but transportation costs will inflate the price. Second, they want their suppliers to build new, Tesla only facilities close to the mass production plant. Suppliers are not going to eat that cost for the privilege of doing business with Tesla, which even at their exaggerated sales expectations will still only be the 4th or 5th larges automaker in the US. That means overhead costs will be through the roof initially, driving up part costs.

      I fully expect them to eventually hit their target, in 5+ years.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    4. Re:about that "competing" thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One by one.

      First, Tesla does not have a nationwide network of charging stations that dwarves anything the Chevy can use. The Chevy can use the standard EPA charging stations that are located ALMOST EVERYWHERE in urban America. Tesla uses only their proprietary charging solution that is located ALMOST NOWHERE in America.

      Second, Chevy quality far surpasses that of Tesla. And, the Chevy won't murder its occupant.

      The Tesla looks hot. The Chevy looks usable. I prefer a usable car, especially if I'm spending almost 40k.

      Speaking of that, if you're spending almost 40k, a couple thousand dollars to get a better, more usable car with better factory support is not that big of a deal.

    5. Re:about that "competing" thing... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Bolt looks horrid, unless you are into that 'beta' look.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:about that "competing" thing... by samwichse · · Score: 1

      I think you forgot point number four...

      That's not even a Tesla Model 3, that's just something thrown together by a fan trying to guess what it would look like.

      There's what an actual Model 3 looks like:
      http://www.motortrend.com/news...

  19. I refuse to support GM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So no thanks from me.

  20. no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no thanks, we'll keep our '15 Golf TDI SportWagen... after the CARB/EPA folks engineered the penalties and Green Initiative, we first got $1,000, which paid for a 10-year paint job on our house... come Fall, we'll get another check for nearly $5,000 and 18 months later, another check for nearly $2,000

    this means we got a high-powered diesel station wagon that gets 47mpg highway, 38mph city for $18,500 brand new!

    this car has been the best equipped, best handling, and most 'torquey' vehicle i've ever owned! it's 'pre-tuned' at the factory!

    and after we get the money, we'll spend a grand or so to 're-tune' the vehicle for even more horsepower!

    the nearest vehicle that comes close is a BMW 328 diesel wagon for nearly $50,000!!!

    w00t!

    progressivist libtools are such fools - simply unbelievable!

    1. Re: no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by mspohr · · Score: 1

      You'll be required to install a fix which will kill economy and performance. Best option will be to sell it back to VW

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re: no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I'm sure someone will have a 'fix' for that. It's software after all, perhaps someone with the right tools can make a backup before doing the update.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re: no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      It would be as legal as defeating any other emissions feature or sensor on your car - big fines if you're caught.

    4. Re: no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by mspohr · · Score: 1

      If you don't care about the pollution you are causing, I guess you could try to undo the fix.
      A lot of people just don't care about polluting. Screw the environment.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re: no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by guruevi · · Score: 1

      So which is more polluting, increased fuel usage or increased CO emissions?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    6. Re: no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by mspohr · · Score: 2

      VW diesel has high NOx emissions. Lung damage and brain damage.
      The fix will have higher CO2 emissions. Climate change.
      It's bad either way. These cars need to be crushed.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    7. Re: no tks, we'll keep our '15 VW TDI SportWagen by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      In practice, if you are caught, they make you put the power robbing equipment back on. That is all.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  21. Re:Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by runningduck · · Score: 4, Funny

    The problem with electric cars is that windshield wipers are horrendously expensive to replace. With my previous car windshield wipers were way less than 1% of total maintenance over five years. My Leaf is about to turn 5 years old and windshield wiper replacements 75% of my total maintenance costs. This is outrageous!

    --
    -rd
  22. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by mspohr · · Score: 2

    My windshield wiper blades are 100% of my 38,000 mile Tesla maintenance cost.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  23. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry this is silly. Fat has about the same specific energy (J/kg) as other hydrocarbon fuel (eg gasoline.) Woz is what, 50 lb overweight? That's about 6 gallons of oil he is hauling around. Nowhere near a single tank of gas for a car.

  24. Re:Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    excellent sarcasm! sadly perhaps too excellent...lol

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  25. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    and one significant caveat. BMW has very little early life maintenance costs....passed on to the owner. The dealers are just eating the actual costs.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  26. who gives a shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool story Woz, no one fucking cares

  27. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by mspohr · · Score: 1

    I really miss all of the fun times sitting at the dealer waiting for oil, etc. Changes. My last ICE car (and it is my last ICE car) had "free" maintenance for 48,000 miles (if your time is worth nothing).

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  28. And this is news worthy how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really. A billionaire worries about his car? Doesn't he have people for that?

  29. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

    Last picture I saw, he was well over 50 lbs beyond obese.

    I'm 6'2", 250. Nobody has ever called me fat. Yet my BMI is 31, so I'm obese. Unless he's lost weight recently, he's well beyond me. 100+lbs

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  30. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    The only downside I see with the lower maintenance schedules of EV's is already showing up in ICEs thanks to longer oil life.

    My current 2012 Honda Insight is roughly 10 months between oil changes. My wife's 2011 Kia Soul is averaging 7500k between changes.

    That's a long time to never see a mechanic. Wheels get out of alignment, tires lose pressure (though newer sensors are helping this), etc. Cars themselves aren't designed to never be serviced, even if the bulk of service requirements are removed with EVs...other things do need checking from time to time at more frequent intervals than a 1-2 year inspection cycle.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  31. From one shitbox... by pinzvidz · · Score: 0

    ...to another.

  32. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Didn't he have an airplane accident? Perhaps he's limited somehow with regards to possible exercise now.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  33. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought most moderns cars had a service reminder built in, or the check engine light was programmed to go off at set intervals or something like that?

  34. Re:Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Obviously you're being facetious, as the Leaf uses tires like any other car. It also has regular pneumatic brakes too, although with regenerative braking you shouldn't go through pads very fast unless you brake really hard a lot.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  35. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by quenda · · Score: 1

    Yet my BMI is 31, so I'm obese.

    You are overweight. For statistical purposes, your data goes in the obese category.
    If you want a more accurate assessment of your individual health, you could get a few tests, but start with the easiest - your waistline.
    Or just look in the mirror. The "I'm not obese just a bit chubby" line won't help. There is no big health difference between 29.9 and 30.1.

    Nobody has ever called me fat.

    Not to your face, and all of us are fat now so nobody notices. Go back 30 years in time, and you'd look fat.

  36. Owner of a Chevy Volt 2017 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (yes, 2017 is the newest model).

    Only issue I have is that the Android based dashboard system regularly reboots while I'm driving. It does this 3 to 4 times per week. When it does, the regular radio continues to work, but everything else stops. That includes: media playing, Bluetooth hands-free phone connection, XM satellite radio, navegation system, etc.

    Being to the dealer 3 times already and it still rebooting at random times.

  37. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you know you are supposed to check the tire pressure yourself right? Like, at least once a week? That's why they have air pumps at service stations.

  38. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by rfengr · · Score: 1

    I'm 6'5" at 250 LB, and I'm fat. Of course no one calls us fat, lest they want the shit kicked out of them.

  39. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well sure, if I was 6'2" 250 lbs at age 7, I'd look fat in my Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles pajamas...

  40. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by DMFNR · · Score: 1

    Then you eat less...

  41. Re:Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

    Pneumatic brakes? Those are for buses and other heavy vehicles. I think you mean hydraulic.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  42. Because his technical brilliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It made him wealthy. Not by crookery, but by brain power. So much for "stupid polock" bs, eh? He is the guy that REALLY put Apple on the map, not Jobs (who imo was nothing more than a salesman blowhard by comparison).

    * I don't mean to "speak ill of the dead" but that's how I see it...

    APK

    P.S.=> He makes me PROUD to be of polish decent... apk

  43. Heh by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    This car hits my sweet spot.

    So something about the drivers' seat.
    "Hey! I don't know what it does yet, but there's a button on here that says 'Spread 'Em and Get 'Em'!!" -- The Drew Carey Show

  44. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    You're FAT!

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  45. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Care to name an auto company that hasn't had a million vehicles recalled? No, I didn't think so.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  46. Re:Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    10km/day for 2000 days is only 20000km. The tyres are just fine. It's the same reason gas was rationed during WW2. No need to ration tyres if your car can only go so far as your energy storage will allow.

  47. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    Saying your Honda Insight goes 10 months between oil changes doesn't mean anything without stating how many miles you drive and what type of oil you use. Synthetics used in modern vehicles not subject to severe conditions can go 7500-15k miles and up to a year change interval.

    Wheels are easy to check for basic alignment. Does the vehicle pull one way or another? Are the tires wearing evenly? If the answer is no and yes respectively, then your alignment is fine.

    If you rely on visiting a shop to check your tire pressure, you're a poor owner. It doesn't matter how mechanically inept you are, every car owner should know how to check tire pressure (and not just rely on a TPMS) and how to correct pressure if it's not correct.

  48. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    All cars have issues; would you rather a car where they try to hide the defects rather than fix them?

  49. Re: Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    And you think most drivers are that attentive?

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  50. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet my BMI is 31, so I'm obese.

    You are overweight. For statistical purposes, your data goes in the obese category.

    Me too, but only by the simple number spit out by a calculation that is not intended as the end-all be-all health metric. Statistically speaking it doesn't matter and I don't care.

    However, I would like to mention that beyond a simple waistline measurement, getting a DEXA scan can be a good idea if you have any concerns. In my area you can get them for $100-150 or so from sports medicine places. It will show you quite accurately how much fat and where it is located on your body.

    I may be "heavy", but if the scan comes up with 8% body fat in all the right places I'm not at all worried about BMI "calling me" obese. And that's really my take on people that get upset about it - they act as if the calculation just insulted them and maybe their mother too. Maybe I should even fatten up a bit, I hear some talk that 10% is ideal.

    Another easy test, if you like to swim, is the float test. I can't float, even if I completely fill my lungs. If I was ever in a plane crash over water that would be a distinct disadvantage if there weren't so many fat people to cling to...

    I agree with your final sentiment about "all of us are fat now", to some extent. It's very sad that our official government advice is based on politics instead of science, and that so many people blindly accept those guidelines as if they were correct. I wouldn't presume to give dietary advice to anybody I didn't know personally, since people tend not to be genetically identical. As for 30 years ago, I may have collected more gray hair and scars, but I still take care of myself so then, as now, I wouldn't "look fat" to you. (Think Olympic gymnast / weight-lifter body-type.) Not many obese people are regularly doing hand-stand push ups, are they? Anyway, I see the internet as a great tool for future generations to learn and master the art of maintaining their bodies to last their entire lifetime. That kind of resource just didn't exist for us.

  51. What did Tesla get wrong? What did Chevy get right by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    "A lot of things wrong with the Tesla model S are done correctly (my opinion) in this car... It gets down to my product ideas of balance and getting the most from the least. Try to make things simple and affordable but very adequate. This car hits my sweet spot."

    That's great, but I'd love some details. I've never driven a Tesla or a Bolt, so I don't know much about them. I'd love to read an engineer's opinion about their strengths and weaknesses, but this vague quote isn't helpful at all.

  52. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    I just sit on them.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  53. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Go back 30 years in time, and you'd look fat.

    True just going back 20 years to my wedding pics.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  54. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    That's the part that many people miss (and I say this as someone who's struggled with weight before and lost ~85lb). If you burn less energy (because you have a super-efficient metabolism, or a hovaround, or whatever), that just means that you don't need to take in as much energy. That can get difficult socially, but its certainly not a reason to just "give up and be fat," when you're not happy at that weight.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  55. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

    I'm 6'2", 250. Nobody has ever called me fat

    Hey, guy who is 6'2" and weights 250 pounds. I didn't see you? Because you're eclipsing my office light. I just wanted to say, I really liked the way you suplexed that guy into the radiator last week. Made. My. Day. Oh, your weight? It's perfect! You know, not everybody could have ripped that toilet out of it's moorings like that. Yes, I know that loud flush was very startling.

    Do you work out?

  56. Re:Horrendously Expensive Windshield Wipers by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Actually, tires themselves will fail on their own at around 5-10 years or so. Nitrogen filling may slow down the rate of decay. The tread inside separates.

  57. out of my pockets by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    If each Chevy Volt pulls $250k from tax payer pockets, I'd hate to think about what the Chevy Bolt costs me when famous people by them.

  58. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    It's true that Tesla has never had a recall affecting 4.3 million vehicles. It's also true that Tesla has not produced 4.3 million vehicles over its entire history. Here are some recalls that Tesla has had:

    Tesla recalls 90,000 Model S sedans to check possible seatbelt defect: https://www.engadget.com/2015/...
    Tesla Recalls 2,700 Model X SUVS to Fix Third-Row Seats: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...
    Tesla Model S Gets Official Recall For Possibility of Fire Associated With Charging Adapter: http://insideevs.com/tesla-mod...

    The last of those was a software problem that was fixed by an over the air update. So Tesla's record on software is not flawless.

  59. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to di by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Tesla Motors. But the fact that the company has only shipped about 150,000 cars to date has something to do with it.

  60. How did Chevy pull this off? by hackel · · Score: 1

    Did they buy another company to do this? There's no way Chevrolet could have achieved this level of competence so quickly. Will be interesting to see the crash reports when they come out. What kind of proprietary software will this thing be running? I know they have Apple garbage in some of their models. Just hope it's not connected to Apple Maps!

    1. Re:How did Chevy pull this off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they have Android garbage. Garbage that constantly reboots.

  61. Re:What did Tesla get wrong? What did Chevy get ri by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    Tesla didn't hire Steve Wozniak to do PR, Chevy did.

  62. Re:What did Tesla get wrong? What did Chevy get ri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla didn't give Wozniak a free car.

  63. Re: What's the obvious question, is he going to d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 6'2" 250lbs (187cm, 114kg) you're either fat or a body builder... Possibly somewhere in between, but unlikely.