Scientists Discover That Horses Can Use Symbols To Talk To Us (sciencemag.org)

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Scientists Discover That Horses Can Use Symbols To Talk To Us (sciencemag.org)

Posted by BeauHD on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @10:00PM from the horsing-around dept.

sciencehabit writes from a report via Science Magazine: Scientists have discovered that horses can learn to use another human tool for communicating: pointing to symbols. They join a short list of other species, including some primates, dolphins, and pigeons, with this talent. Scientists taught 23 riding horses of various breeds to look at a display board with three icons, representing wearing or not wearing a blanket. Horses could choose between a "no change" symbol or symbols for "blanket on" or "blanket off." The horses did not touch the symbols randomly, but made their choices based on the weather. If it was wet, cold, and windy, they touched the blanket-on icon; horses that were already wearing a blanket nosed the "no change" image. But when the weather was sunny, the animals touched the blanket-off symbol; those that weren't blanketed pressed the "no change" icon. The study's strong results show that the horses understood the consequences of their choices, say the scientists, who hope that other researchers will use their method to ask horses more questions. The report has been published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

107 of 171 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Finally! by JockTroll · 2016-09-21 22:09 · Score: 5, Funny

We can ask them "why the long face?"

--
Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
1. Re: Finally! by drewsup · 2016-09-21 22:25 · Score: 1
  
  Too bad there isn't a
  - I'm going to kick you in the face. Yes /no
  I'm going to bite you as soon as you turn around yes /no. Button
2. Re: Finally! by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-21 22:32 · Score: 1
  
  I don't think that kicking and biting are issues compared to the things people do to horses - slaughtering them for meat or working them for years before sending them to the glue factory.
3. Re: Finally! by JaredOfEuropa · 2016-09-21 23:06 · Score: 1
  
  Your face / hand is button enough.
  
  --
  If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
4. Re: Finally! by bistromath007 · 2016-09-21 23:15 · Score: 1
  
  Working them at what? Unless they're racehorses, which is admittedly kind of a horrible industry, they're basically pets for stupidly rich people. Other things people do with horses are hobbies by comparison, and work them about as hard as dog agility training.
5. Re:Finally! by Rei · 2016-09-21 23:28 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  How elaborate can this Q&A get?
  Q: "Hey horse - how come Christians are allowed to draw pictures of their prophets and Muslims aren't?"
  A: "I don't know. I am a horse, and, as such, have no knowledge of the intricacies of Islamic theology. I assume you're asking me because I am a brown horse? In which case, go to hell."
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
6. Re: Finally! by jellomizer · 2016-09-22 00:45 · Score: 1
  
  I wouldn't say for stupidly rich people.
  A middle class family could afford a horse. We have middle class people with a hobbies such as vintage cars, carpentry, electronics... All really costing a good chunk of change.
  
  --
  If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
7. Re:Finally! by codeButcher · 2016-09-22 01:05 · Score: 2
  
  I assume you're asking me because I am a brown horse? In which case, go to hell."
  Because everyone knows the politically correct term is bay.
  
  --
  Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
8. Re: Finally! by kria · 2016-09-22 01:32 · Score: 1
  
  I had that most perfect of situations for a young girl: my best friend had her own horse. Her father was, I believe, a model maker at Ford, a job that I assume has all gone computerized now. Very middle class neighborhood, but on that and a (private school) teacher's salary, they had that and the dad's hobby was sailing, believe it or not. Obviously the horse was boarded somewhere. I vaguely remember that maybe they allowed him to be used for other kid's riding lessons to partially pay for that, but it's tough to say, it was a long time ago.
9. Re: Finally! by gurps_npc · 2016-09-22 02:08 · Score: 1
  
  Not true.
  Miniature horses are routinely used as service animals, particularly in rural areas (harder to use in a city and they need more outside space).
  They are just as smart, live a lot longer (25-35 years vs.13 on average), and are physically stronger so they can do more work. They do cost more to keep (food, upkeep), and need more space.
  
  --
  excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
10. Re:Finally! by PPH · 2016-09-22 02:31 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  These two racehorses were standing in their stable. The first one said, "I've been in 18 races and won 16." The second one said, "That's nothing. I've been in 28 races and won 25." At this point, a greyhound dog walks by, and overhearing the horses, says "I've been in 48 races and won every one of them!"
  One horse looks at the other and says, "That's amazing! A talking dog!"
  
  --
  Have gnu, will travel.
11. Re:Finally! by hey! · 2016-09-22 03:13 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Horse:
  Many Muslims (like some Christian sects) consider pictorial representations of the human figure as violating the prohibition on graven images. As with those iconoclastic Christian sects that prohibition is most strictly observed when it comes to religious figures, possibly because of the quasi-worship of Christian saints Muslims witnessed among German knights in the Holy Land, which must have struck them (as it would later Protestants) as a kind of polytheism.
  That's why when you look at the massive, elaborately decorated mosques you won't see a single human or animal figure. Instead you'll see elaborate geometrical figures and highly stylized calligraphy, which are the main visual form of Sunni artistic expression. To find any sort of art depicting people one must look to Shia dominated areas, such as Persia (Iran), which boasts many fine examples.
  The universe is large, little man, and full of endless wonders; the time you have to fill your mind with those wonders is short.
  
  --
  Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
12. Re: Finally! by Runaway1956 · 2016-09-22 03:49 · Score: 1
  
  Depends on your location, I guess. A lot of horses around here are owned by lower middle class, and maybe upper poverty class. Some people DO still actually work horses.
  I'll admit, most horses are owned by people who don't really have any use for them. My younger stepson has two. One was given to him, the other bought at such a low price it might as well have been a gift. In the past year, I've only seen his wife on a horse once, not seen him or the kids astride a horse. Pets - just big expensive pets.
  I've owned horses in the past. My horses were part companion, part work, part social, and part chick bait. I never really NEEDED a horse, but I found occasional uses for them.
  No, I've not owned registered thoroughbreds or anything like that. Only one of my rides was registered, and he was an Appaloosa. His papers didn't mean anything to him, or to me.
  Seriously, if you visit my part of the country, you can find horses for a couple hundred dollars. Or, you can shop for the popular breeds, and try to find a 'Best of Show" horse for tens of thousands.
  
  --
  "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
13. Re: Finally! by Runaway1956 · 2016-09-22 04:03 · Score: 1
  
  The food part? Dogs are carnivores. They like meat and meat products. That kind of food is rather expensive. The most expensive feed for horses, miniature or otherwise, would be alfalfa. A miniature probably doesn't eat a lot more than a couple of sheep or goats. Since you don't actually "work" a miniature, you probably aren't going to give him much grain, if any. (added benefit of alfalfa is, it is high protein, very well digested, so there is less waste to deal with)
  I realize that a service animal will probably be spoiled to some degree. His owner will buy apples, sweet feed, or grains. I'm quite certain that the service animal doesn't "need" any of that. Just plain old Bermuda grass hay, and a quarter cup of oats should be sufficient.
  I think it's a close draw between the cost of feeding a miniature horse, or a dog.
  Before I hit "submit", it occurred to me that the majority of service animals are used in cities. So, maybe I'm not entirely right about the cost of feed. In the city, you probably don't have room to store a huge round bale hay. Probably don't have ready access to a market. So, you'll to to some special pet care store, and pay more for a 120 pound square bale of hay, than I can buy a two ton round bale for.
  The last bales I bought were 1100 pound rolls of mixed bermuda and coastal grass, paid $25 each for them. That is the "standard" size around here.
  
  --
  "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
14. Re: Finally! by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:13 · Score: 1
  
  eh, plenty of solidly middle class people where I live have horses (midwest). All total a horse is about $250 a month to keep.
15. Re: Finally! by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:14 · Score: 1
  
  you think a pet that costs couple or three hundred bucks a month is only for rich person? get a real job you slacker.
16. Re: Finally! by Calydor · 2016-09-22 05:35 · Score: 2
  
  As someone that keeps two horses at home:
  Monthly grain: 40 Euro.
  Monthly hay, October-April only: 50 Euro.
  Monthly straw bedding: 40 Euro.
  Other expenses, eg. removal of used bedding: Let's say 300 Euro spread over the full year, that's 25 Euro a month.
  Total: 155 Euro a month. For a hobby, not that bad.
  It's hard to put a price tag on the land since it came with the house and I wanted to live rurally anyway.
  
  --
  -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
17. Re: Finally! by cheesybagel · 2016-09-22 05:56 · Score: 1
  
  Dogs need to eat protein. If you look the ingredients in a lot of cheap dog feed they are basically soy. Because its cheap
  They'll also eat hydrocarbons like bread or rice though. Just expect them to have a high chance to get diabetic at an already age as a result.
18. Re: Finally! by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 06:51 · Score: 1
  
  you don't take them to vets for checkup, dental and immunization? My friends that have horses do that here, that $250 a month covers everything
19. Re: Finally! by Calydor · 2016-09-22 07:10 · Score: 1
  
  Seeing as I'm around them on a daily basis I can watch for changes in behavior and health. They have no dental issues (though the mother of one of them did need to have teeth filed a bit a decade ago), the vaccinations and wormer are cheap enough they fall in that Other Expenses line.
  
  --
  -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
20. Re:Finally! by Darinbob · 2016-09-22 08:24 · Score: 1
  
  The Micheal Bay horse, it explodes when you get too close.
21. Re:Finally! by Darinbob · 2016-09-22 09:03 · Score: 1
  
  Who's a good little horsey? You are! Here have an apple. Don't eat any more of that peanut butter it makes it look like your'e talking.
22. Re: Finally! by Methadras · 2016-09-23 08:55 · Score: 1
  
  I think you can DUI on a horse too.
23. Re: Finally! by swalve · 2016-09-30 14:50 · Score: 1
  
  Pfft. For that price I can have 250 cats.
24. Re:Finally! by swalve · 2016-09-30 14:51 · Score: 1
  
  I have no idea WHY that is funny, but I laughed out loud nontheless.
25. Re:Finally! by swalve · 2016-09-30 14:54 · Score: 1
  
  And you know where they got that idea? From the 10 commandments. So few haters understand that Islam is just an alternate offshoot of Judism, Christianity being another one.
Can't say I'm surprised by Viol8 · 2016-09-21 22:22 · Score: 2

Herd/pack animals need to communicate with each other in some way so the brain structures must be present to allow them to communicate using either voice or body language or in this case pointing.
1. Re:Can't say I'm surprised by hcs_$reboot · 2016-09-21 22:25 · Score: 3, Funny
  
  Robert Redford used whispering.
  
  --
  Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
2. Re:Can't say I'm surprised by clickety6 · 2016-09-22 01:22 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  But he did it too much...that's why he was known as the hoarse whisperer.
  
  --
  ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
3. Re:Can't say I'm surprised by avgjoe62 · 2016-09-22 02:28 · Score: 2
  
  Whoa there fella! Reign in those puns!
  
  --
  How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?
4. Re:Can't say I'm surprised by werepants · 2016-09-22 04:25 · Score: 1
  
  Seriously. No reason to stirrup the discussion by bringing politics into it.
Science always helping by Sobakus · 2016-09-21 22:41 · Score: 5, Funny

At long last Sarah Jessica Parker wont freeze during winter ever again!!!
1. Re:Science always helping by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-22 01:03 · Score: 1
  
  At long last Sarah Jessica Parker wont freeze during winter ever again!!!
  You know, I'm all for a good joke, but I think we should take this one by the reins and settle down a bit.
  No, no, not for her sake; it's making the horses look bad.
2. Re:Science always helping by simplypeachy · 2016-09-22 02:08 · Score: 1
  
  AC baying for +1 Funny mod points, as always.
I for one... by dwillden · 2016-09-21 23:00 · Score: 1

Welcome our Blanket wearing (or not if its' nice and warm) equine overlords!

--
I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
Cats can do that too by Opportunist · 2016-09-21 23:06 · Score: 1

Though they prefer using their own symbols. Jumping into your bowl of spaghetti means "my food dish is empty" and crapping in them means "my kitty litter is full". And them lying curled up in a corner means "no change necessary, slave!"

--
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
1. Re:Cats can do that too by Anna+Merikin · 2016-09-22 04:20 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  While your examples could be simple aggressive behavior in cat culture, they are amusing.
  However, cats indeed use symbolic reasoning. Mine, a mature shelter animal when I got her, loved to play with a boot lace tied off with feathers which I "flew" near her until she realiized it was only a toy controlled by me, at which time she lost interest and did not play anymore.
  However, when she wants my company, she fetches the feathered lace and brings it to me. She does not want to play with it -- she uses it as a symbol to say she wants some face time at the places she hangs out in (the porch or the back room with the sunny exposure.)
  Am I surprised? At first I was, but it looks like Noam Chomsky was right -- we (many creatures) are "hard-wired" for language.
2. Re:Cats can do that too by Opportunist · 2016-09-22 04:52 · Score: 1
  
  And what crime did the bird commit to be taped there next to a cat in distress?
  
  --
  We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
3. Re: Cats can do that too by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-22 07:25 · Score: 1
  
  I once had to help civilise feral kittens and their mother who was found living on a rubbish tip. Their mother used to come in, brush against them and make a rrrrr-miow noise (identical to the sound made when some contact takes them by surprise). The kittens would then respond with a purrr if they were full or a meeiow if they were hungry.
Cart before the horse? by SpiralBound · 2016-09-21 23:16 · Score: 5, Interesting

Hmmm... While it has been shown in a variety of ways going back at least as far as the original Mr. Ed that horses are smart and capable of performing a large repetoire of tricks, I do wonder in this particular case if the horses are touching the symbols at the appropriate times because they understand what the symbols mean, or because they were trained to touch the symbols at the appropriate times. It is a vitally important distinction. Just how did they teach the meaning of each symbol to them without instead accidentally training them to perform without any true understanding of the symbols themselves? Humans have instinctual behaviours towards pattern recognition, anthromorphism, self-delusion, and rationalisation, thus experimential methods must be very carefully designed to remove these influences.

--
Avatar of the God(s) Random
1. Re:Cart before the horse? by Rei · 2016-09-21 23:35 · Score: 1
  
  Humans have instinctual behaviours towards pattern recognition, anthromorphism, self-delusion, and rationalisation, thus experimential methods must be very carefully designed to remove these influences.
  And given that it's been peer-reviewed, the presumption is that they designed their methods to do just that, rather than "peer reviewers in animal behavior aren't aware of the caveats involved in animal studies"
  That doesn't mean 100% that the presumption is correct - peer review is hardly a flawless process. But it is the presumption until shown otherwise.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
2. Re:Cart before the horse? by Rei · 2016-09-21 23:53 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  Reading over the study, in case you're curious: they discuss the Clever Hans effect, how it manifests (the horse observes the trainer or audience and does what it needs to get a reward based on the audience's reaction). In this study, the trainer was off to the side, out of the field of view of the horse, and they monitored where the horse was looking to ensure it was only looking at the symbols when making its choice. Then the horse was given a reward regardless of what symbol it chose; it simply had to choose one to get a treat. The symbol touches were easy to record and unambiguous, so there was no "interpretation" of the horses behavior in question. The researchers also observed side behaviors. For example, once the horses had learned to use the symbols to control their blanketing status they often became very eager to go into the testing facilitity (before the phase where treats were on offer). It was observed that horses that sought to have their blanket removed in this manner tended to be sweaty underneath it, while those that didn't seek it out weren't.
  To be fair, there's even more that could be done. I really liked the controls that Pepperberg did in her studies of Alex (the African Grey parrot). She had it set up so that the person asking a question didn't know the answer, and neither did the person scoring the result. In this case here, clearly the trainer knew the weather and thus what would be the "optimal" blanketing status. But by paying attention to where the horse's focus is, whether it's hesitating, etc, and giving it a reward either way, I agree that that's some pretty good controlling for the Clever Hans effect.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
3. Re:Cart before the horse? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-22 00:23 · Score: 1
  
  If this were "talking" or "communicating", then the horses would have no reason to select any icon when nobody was watching. That they did it even if there was nobody to 'talk to' shows us that it is simple condition response behavior.
  Unless we are claiming the horses are talking to nobody, this is entirely stupid.
4. Re:Cart before the horse? by mrbester · 2016-09-22 00:30 · Score: 1
  
  "In this study, the trainer was off to the side, out of the field of view of the horse, and they monitored where the horse was looking to ensure it was only looking at the symbols when making its choice"
  Yeah, horses have 350 vision, so "off to the side" means the trainer was still in view...
  
  --
  "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
5. Re:Cart before the horse? by Rei · 2016-09-22 01:12 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Its still just training/conditioning to the environment and 'response and reward'
  Something not disputed by the study. The top keyword in the article summary is "Operant conditioning" (followed by "Blanket", "Rug", "Thermoregulation", "Cognition" and "Clicker training"). You'd do well to read the study. The key takeaways are:
  1) Horses can be conditioned via use of visual symbols
  2) Horses can use this to initiate communicated preference rather than just as a response
  3) Horses learned much faster using the approach in this study than others
  4) Horses understood the link between wearing / removing a blanket and their eventual body temperature for the given weather conditions
  5) Different horses took different lengths of time to learn the connection with the symbols, but all managed to learn it, and once it was learned it was understood effectively 100% and not forgotten with time
  It's also worth mentioning that most human behaviors are also learned through operant conditioning. That's how we all learned as children. There is no simple line between human and non-human in this regard. E.g., you stick your fingers on a hot burner, you get burned, you learn to avoid hot burners without even having to think about it. Your parent holds up an alphabet block with a "Q" on it, you say "Q", you get praise. The father of operant conditioning, B.F. Skinner, mainly wrote about it with a focus on its effects on human behavior, not animal behavior in general.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
6. Re:Cart before the horse? by Rei · 2016-09-22 01:15 · Score: 1
  
  There is of course a difference between being in one's field of vision and being the object focused on, which can be seen by a variety of factors, e.g. where they're pointing their head, their ears, whether there's any hesitation about the action (aka looking for outside cues), etc.
  Clever Hans was an extremely well studied case. The concept that any reviewer is not going to be familiar with it and how to control for it is beyond silly.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
7. Re:Cart before the horse? by Rei · 2016-09-22 01:21 · Score: 1
  
  If you want the exact wording, it doesn't say "out of the field of view", but "stepped 2-3 meters aside ... standing passive to avoid giving the horse any cues". They later go further into the details of how they monitored the horse's attention and discussion of the Clever Hans effect. They also alter the sides that the different symbols were on to avoid side preferences.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
8. Re:Cart before the horse? by Immerman · 2016-09-22 01:53 · Score: 1
  
  And how exactly is "do this to get the humans to do that" not communication? It ain't Shakespeare, but the very essence of communication is to use your behavior to alter the behavior of others. And doing so via symbols, rather than something more direct like nudging the blanket or shying away, shows a capability to communicate through an abstraction filter - which is the interesting part. As I understand it most animals can't make the mental leap that touching symbols can be used to unambiguously communicate their desires to the generally oblivious humans. Presumably they either don't have the mental wiring to distinguish between visual patterns, or to recognize that symbols can be used as a means of communication.
  As for the eagerness and sweatiness, neither is a particularly subjective observation, nor is noting that it tended to be those individuals who bore evidence of likely discomfort with their current blanket status, and proceeded to indicate a desire for status change, who were most eager to get to the symbols that would let them do so. Such a pattern is strong evidence that the horses understood the implications of their actions, and were thus engaging in intentional communication rather than coincidental behavior just to get the treat reward for pushing any button.
  Sure, there's an operant conditioning component - but that's absolutely the case in humans learning to communicate as well - first it's "these noises will get me food/changed/the attention of a particular person",and much later it grows into "using these more sophisticated words in this fashion will get me more respect/attention from groups of people want it from". Most human communication could after all be conducted with monosyllabic words - and there's plenty of groups you can be welcomed into using little else (sports bar crowds spring to mind), but if you want to be welcomed into groups of intelligent conversationalists, then you need to develop a more information-dense vocabulary - and there's no shortage of people out there who use big words (often with little understanding of their meaning) to artificially increase their perceived intelligence and alter the way other people respond to them.
  
  --
  --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
9. Re:Cart before the horse? by simplypeachy · 2016-09-22 02:09 · Score: 1
  
  Hans the Counting Horse convinced a lot of people, too :-)
10. Re:Cart before the horse? by Feyshtey · 2016-09-22 04:11 · Score: 1
  
  The point is that the horse was able to identify the RIGHT symbol for it's own preferred outcome. That's the interesting outcome to the study : The horses differentiated between symbols.
  
  Yes, this is essentially training the horses to perform an action. But the test could not have been considered a success if the horses didn't demonstrate the cognitive ability to identify symbols and choose appropriately between symbols for a predictable outcome. It is a step further than "ring the bell, get a treat".
  
  The condition of the horse (sweaty) wasn't a factor brought by the anticipation of the tests. It was a manufactured state to determine if the horse would demonstrate a desire to have its blanket removed, AND be able to communicate that desire.
  
  --
  "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
11. Re: Cart before the horse? by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:22 · Score: 1
  
  that's what my mane man told me, he's no foal and can look pasture usual stereotypes about horses.
12. Re:Cart before the horse? by mrbester · 2016-09-22 20:11 · Score: 1
  
  That's why I queried the phrase as it, on its own, raised doubts. Anybody who has had actual dealings with horses instead of Lazeeboy ACs posting from the all-knowing reclined position in their mother's basement whose closest interaction is watching Champion The Wonder Horse on rerun would have them.
  
  --
  "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
13. Re:Cart before the horse? by mrbester · 2016-09-22 20:12 · Score: 1
  
  Thank you.
  
  --
  "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
Finally by PsyMan · 2016-09-21 23:33 · Score: 2

The horses seem to have made a breakthrough where the Dolphins and Chimps have all but thrown in the towel. Humans are finally realising the rest of the planet has been happily communicating for years. The 60's documentary about our species interpreter Dr Dolittle should never have been dismissed so quickly as a conspiricy theory.
1. Re:Finally by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:25 · Score: 1
  
  You've just made me realize my local zoo doesn't provide the dolphins with towels, the bastards. I'm not sure what the chimps have back in the concrete faux-cave at the rear of the exhibit but I intend to get to the bottom of this matter.
Racist Scientists by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-21 23:40 · Score: 2, Interesting

As a dog, I am highly offended by this article. When I grab my leash and whine, my human knows to let me show him around our territory. How is that not using a human tool to communicate? Or is seeing a leash an instinctive reaction in humans that causes them to need to be led by someone smaller than them? That must be it because the little humans never let me walk them when they see the leash.
Never mind, I guess they're not racist. Humans are just dumber than I realized. I thought they understood me, but apparently they're simply too primitive.
1. Re:Racist Scientists by Immerman · 2016-09-22 01:58 · Score: 1
  
  It's certainly communication, but it's not *symbolic* communication, which introduces an additional level of abstraction that many species are apparently not capable of. Pretty much every animal is capable of more direct forms of communication.
  
  --
  --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
2. Re:Racist Scientists by Rei · 2016-09-22 04:31 · Score: 1
  
  On a related note, my parrot literally tells me when he wants company, when he wants to be scratched, when he wants to go to bed, and when he wants a treat, and he's not happy if you do the wrong thing.
  Basic single-concept communication seems to be an ability that a wide range of animals are capable of. We seem unusual in our skill at combining concepts. Some animals show a degree of limited ability at this (Pepperberg's work with Alex for example, showed that he could understand qualities of objects, differentiate based on multiple properties at once, etc), but the ability to readily convey whole thought processes seems to be what set us on the road that we ended up on versus our less successful relatives.
  If we want to get into speculation, it's worth noting that Neanderthals appeared to be quite intelligent - making axes, fire, dwellings, even watercraft... yet their technology seems to have advanced little over the course of 200k years. Yet then comes Cro-Magnon man whose technology advances rapidly even as he expands his range over ~20k years - it's really astounding fast all of these new inventions come into play (musical instruments, deep sea fishing, domestication of dogs, painting, rope, pottery, harpoons, saws...). While there's evidence of some potential interbreeding with Neanderthals, by and large they replaced the species. Why did a clearly intelligent species get replaced so readily? Why did Cro-Magnon's technology improve while Neanderthal's was mostly static? How did Cro-Magnon manage to organize its larger social groups? All of this points at better communication - better ability to convey complex ideas from one individual to the next.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
3. Re:Racist Scientists by Rei · 2016-09-22 05:02 · Score: 1
  
  I'm really interested in understanding more about dolphin communication. Because we know that they "point" at things with their sonar, and listen in to each others' sonar returns (they're one of the few animals that "points" at things as a form of communication). How far does it go? One theory I've seen is that the burst pulsed sounds can mimic sonar returns, and thus can utilize a rough pictoral communication. Whistling had long been the main focus for communication (with the assumption that burst pulsed sound was part of echolocation), but the main critique I've seen for that is that it would imply that non-whistling dolphin species don't communicate at all. Furthermore the bursts appear to be far too fast to be useful for echolocation - there's no waiting for a return, so it seems only to be useful for conveying a signal. We know that the pulsed sounds appear to form specific patterns in specific contexts, such as aggression or courtship, potentially varying depending on the species. We just don't know how to interpret them.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
Mr Ed by Alain+Williams · 2016-09-21 23:44 · Score: 2

I always knew that that was a documentary!
now they can choose by nozzo · 2016-09-21 23:48 · Score: 1

option 1) please nail more metal to my feet option 2) I'll go natural thank you
1. Re:now they can choose by Immerman · 2016-09-22 02:06 · Score: 1
  
  >So, up to a point, horses like horseshoes.
  So we claim - but it would be interesting to get it straight from the horses mouth, so to speak. Just because it benefits them, doesn't mean that they understand that it does so. And even if they do, that doesn't imply that they want it done.
  As a human example, pretty much everyone knows that diets relatively low in fat and sugar will benefit their health, but that doesn't mean they like them.
  
  --
  --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
2. Re:now they can choose by simplypeachy · 2016-09-22 02:13 · Score: 1
  
  Until the horse is then ridden to death around a track for the entertainment of a civilised species.
3. Re:now they can choose by Feyshtey · 2016-09-22 04:16 · Score: 1
  
  As a human example, pretty much everyone knows that diets relatively low in fat and sugar will benefit their health, but that doesn't mean they like them.
  And yet we have a government increasingly interested in telling us we're damn well going to do what they think is best for us whether we like it or not. No salt on restaurant tables, no 32.oz soda drinks, regulation on alcohol, tobacco, drugs, etc.
  
  So I guess what you're saying is that the government treats us like we treat horses.
  
  --
  "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
4. Re:now they can choose by Feyshtey · 2016-09-22 04:32 · Score: 1
  
  You do realize you're talking about a sliver of the horses in the nation, right? I'm not saying I like the race horse industry. I'm simply saying that you're essentially falsely judging millions of very responsible and loving horse owners based on a vast minority of them associated with a very specific industry. It's like comparing every person who gardens to massive farming operations clear-cutting rainforests.
  
  --
  "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
All animals understand cause/effect by tomhath · 2016-09-21 23:51 · Score: 5, Insightful

Here's a video of a cow that clearly comes up with a plan, then carries it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
1. Re:All animals understand cause/effect by Gilgaron · 2016-09-22 00:18 · Score: 1
  
  My mod points expired... but very interesting link!
2. Re:All animals understand cause/effect by Immerman · 2016-09-22 02:08 · Score: 1
  
  But not all can understand it when passed through an abstraction like symbolic communication.
  
  --
  --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
3. Re:All animals understand cause/effect by avandesande · 2016-09-22 04:16 · Score: 1
  
  Maybe they just haven't tried. My uncle was a dairy farmer and had interesting anecdotes as to why he thought cows were smarter than generally believed.
  
  --
  love is just extroverted narcissism
4. Re:All animals understand cause/effect by chris-chittleborough · 2016-09-22 13:55 · Score: 1
  
  I disagree. Merino sheep, for instance, do not understand much at all, relying instead on (1) random variations in behaviour of individuals combined with (2) following those individuals who seem prosperous. But cows are different. Cattle herds are run by the boss cow(s), and cows compete for senior positions using intelligence and/or determination and/or physical intimidation. Some cows are quite smart; most are not that clever. (I understand that elephants can be even smarter.)
no change by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-21 23:59 · Score: 2

Surely I cannot be the only person who's curious what the "no change" icon they used looks like. :)
horses are smart by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-22 00:08 · Score: 1

... that the horses understood ...

Ever see a movie where a stockman/cowboy splits a cow from the herd? A good horse is doing 99% of the work; the rider is just pointing to the cow.
Clever horses by TJHook3r · 2016-09-22 00:51 · Score: 2

In the UK, horses study for 'Hay Levels'
19th century smart vehicles by Applehu+Akbar · 2016-09-22 00:53 · Score: 4, Informative

When you staggered out of the saloon wasted, your horse would get you home safely. Long before Siri and Tesla, a lot of intelligent navigation must have been done that way.
1. Re:19th century smart vehicles by kria · 2016-09-22 01:40 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  My great grandfather drove a milk wagon. His horses knew all his stops, apparently, and would start off for the next one when he got back in the wagon without any signs from him. I assume that's not as intelligent behavior as what they're testing, but it's still pretty cool. :)
2. Re:19th century smart vehicles by Rei · 2016-09-22 04:08 · Score: 1
  
  They mentioned in the study related research on teaching horses to navigate mazes. Horses learned the maze at different rates, but they all eventually learned it, and once they learned it they never forgot it, no matter how long it was between maze runs. Seems directly applicable to the "milk route" case.
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
3. Re:19th century smart vehicles by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:27 · Score: 1
  
  yes, my friends and I stagger out of saloons on occasion.
4. Re:19th century smart vehicles by cellocgw · 2016-09-22 04:37 · Score: 1
  
  You were ninja'd by Randall -- https://xkcd.com/1720/
  
  --
  https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
5. Re:19th century smart vehicles by thegarbz · 2016-09-22 11:24 · Score: 1
  
  Animals will instinctively learn patterns to gain a reward. What is an order of magnitude more difficult in intelligence is learning a pattern by correlating independent events. e.g. Following a milk truck is easy, picking a symbol based on the current weather and whether or not I'm wearing a blanked requires quite a bit more thought.
  Fascinating creates.
Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-22 00:53 · Score: 1

they're basically pets for stupidly rich people.
All over the west, horses do work; they can get to, and through terrain ATV's can't (thus making a mockery of the "all terrain" part), they are very good at assisting in collecting and collaring livestock because they know what the task is, and can operate in concert with from the person sitting them who is trying to rope or herd the animal.
You really should get out more.
1. Re:Horseshit by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:17 · Score: 1
  
  I'm still laughing too hard at the "rich" part, horse is less than an average person's car payment per month. A Walmart greeter at $9 / hr could afford a horse; one week a month they'd be working for the horse though 8D
2. Re: Horseshit by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 06:49 · Score: 1
  
  Sadly the horses don't pay you to shovel their manure
3. Re:Horseshit by sdaemon · 2016-09-23 00:46 · Score: 2
  
  It's easy to make a small fortune from owning horses.
  All you have to do is start with a big fortune.
Crap before Remorse? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-22 01:00 · Score: 1

Adding subjective observations like claiming 'simple action/reward conditioning' and 'doesn't confirm anything' doesn't really confirm anything about the experiment itself. It simply reflects what you would expect from conditioned behavior of a disagreeable AC.
Politics politics by codeButcher · 2016-09-22 01:01 · Score: 1

the horses understood the consequences of their choices
Wow. That's better than most voters in the modern world...

--
Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
peanut butter works too by ionymous · 2016-09-22 01:28 · Score: 1

of course of course
Uh by nospam007 · 2016-09-22 01:58 · Score: 1

Did they also have a symbol with a fatso on a horse?
Houyhnhnm...good name for a search engine by nightcats · 2016-09-22 02:05 · Score: 1

Remember the last part of Gulliver's Travels? Where G. encounters the houyhnhnms, who are more intelligent and civilized than the humanoid yahoos?

--
Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
No Change symbol by ddtmm · 2016-09-22 02:21 · Score: 1

I'd like to know what the No Change image looks like. Did I miss that somewhere in the article?
1. Re:No Change symbol by diamondmagic · 2016-09-22 02:53 · Score: 1
  
  The full study is at http://www.appliedanimalbehavi...
  Symbols were painted on a white wooden board.
  It was a horizontal line for "blanket on", blank white for "no change", vertical line for "blank off".
  In all cases, the blanket was adjusted by a human handler (if only to put it back where it was).
  
  --
  Wonder what the public key field is for?
Not a Basket of Deplorables by vikingpower · 2016-09-22 02:31 · Score: 1

the horses understood the consequences of their choices
Which is way better than must Trump voters do....

--
Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
Re:Training by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-22 03:06 · Score: 1

My dog has learned that pulling the bathroom door handle ( which makes a noise ) makes me fill up his upstairs water bowl.
He's quite adept at opening doors, so if he was trying to open it he would have.
I'm not impressed... by Namlak · 2016-09-22 03:22 · Score: 1

Talk to me when they can master pointers.
If horses can do it then by pjv936 · 2016-09-22 03:44 · Score: 1

it is a good assumption that most animals can do it. Maybe we should figure out a good mechanism to give them the ability to do so. Maybe a devices that track the eyes.
Clever Hans again by Script+Cat · 2016-09-22 04:07 · Score: 1

Do the researchers faces light up when the horse points to the right symbol?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I hear that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton by tgibson · 2016-09-22 04:07 · Score: 1

have been using this same technique to prep for the debate on Monday. Hillary has been casting about desperately for the icon indicating she would like a glass of water. And Donald is expected to walk on to the debate stage with a blanket draped over him.
Christians and Jews are also not allowed by pjv936 · 2016-09-22 04:16 · Score: 1

to create graven images. They are just more disobedient.
Re:nice by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:20 · Score: 1

the glue factories won't take their carcasses though. you can cut them up for chum or enrich soil in a worm garden for you anglers.
Re:At the risk of not beingt taken seriously, MOO by rubycodez · 2016-09-22 04:26 · Score: 1

I don't exploit them, I eat them for dinner.
Horses are smarter than you'd think by Cro+Magnon · 2016-09-22 05:37 · Score: 5, Insightful

I once asked one if Windows was any good.
"Neigh!"

--
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
Quantify the throughput by DulcetTone · 2016-09-22 06:39 · Score: 1

what sort of bitt rate are we talking here?

--
tone
But this begs the question... by burtosis · 2016-09-22 08:02 · Score: 1

How did horses get ahold of a set of cymbols and how did they ever bang them together.
Shouda Oughtta Gone For The Duck by TheRealHocusLocus · 2016-09-22 08:17 · Score: 1

the final trial in the series was not actually part of the study plan. That kid who was sent to get the signs printed, they did them by the dozen so he cooked it up, it was his idea. With mock earnestness the signs were placed on the post and the horse was led around. They were,
1. A symbol representing quantum "spooky action at a distance".
2. A symbol representing a horse indicating a choice by indicating a symbol indicating a choice indicated by a symbol indicating a choice, by a horse.
3. A duck. No seriously, a duck. Really.
The horse pricked back its ears and leaned away from spooky towards the duck, then swung back slightly, as if to indicate
blurred motion at the edges of vision, for a moment clearly the edges repeated which warp through the center accompanied by a sudden and awful smell of burning plastic (isn't there always?) and a sound half crackling half laughter yet horrifyingly like reality being crumpled up like a newspaper or the sudden horror of blackened paper edges when no flame is visible all to hide something unthinkably
NO CARRIER

--
<blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
Re:Mr Dead? by Quirkz · 2016-09-22 08:49 · Score: 1

I prefer Mr. Dead (a buddy story with brainnnss).
A corpse is a corpse of course of course, that is of course unless the corpse is the zombie Mr. Dead!

--
The Quirkz Handbook of Self-Improvement for People Who Are Already Pretty Okay
Real Recognition by cmaxb · 2016-09-22 12:25 · Score: 1

But did the horses recognize the *symbols* ? if the symbols were painted on a board, and they just pointed their nose at different spots for the same recurring results is different than if they kept moving the actual positions of the symbols around
1. Re:Real Recognition by Rei · 2016-09-22 14:40 · Score: 1
  
  They did move the symbols around. You know, the paper was linked in the summary...
  
  --
  "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
Re:Training by swalve · 2016-09-30 14:57 · Score: 1

Until you train your dog to choose between one flavor of dog food versus another, it's a whole different thing.