Slashdot Mirror


Indian IT Sector Warns Against US Visa Bill (reuters.com)

India's IT lobby warned on Tuesday that a bill before the U.S. Congress aimed at imposing tougher visa rules unfairly targets some of its members and will not solve a U.S. labor shortage in technology and engineering. From a report on Reuters: Industry lobby group Nasscom was responding to a bill introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California, that would double the minimum salary required for holders of H-1B visas to $130,000 and determine how many of the visas were allocated, based on factors such as overall wages. India's $150 billion information technology sector, led by Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys and Wipro, uses the H-1B visas to fly engineers and developers to service clients in the U.S., their biggest market, but opponents say they are using the visas to replace U.S. workers. Concerns about President Donald Trump's immigration policies were heightened by his ban on refugees on Friday. "The Lofgren Bill contains provisions that may prove challenging for the Indian IT sector and will also leave loopholes that will nullify the objective of saving American jobs," Nasscom said.

287 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. Take a hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could careless about the Indian IT job sector. Piss off.

    1. Re:Take a hike by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you *do* care. Awww.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Take a hike by Sam36 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      THIS^^^^ We don't care.

    3. Re:Take a hike by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Aw, H1B Zombies not feeling the burn?

    4. Re: Take a hike by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      No more papadum or tamarind chutney for you!!!

    5. Re: Take a hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      India can pound sand. That includes all the Indian contractors here that took away jobs from Americans who were trying to feed their families. That includes all the Indian nationals who took job opportunities from Americans who wanted to work for agencies like NASA, DOD, or NIH. Indians who showed no remorse for the Americans they betrayed, Americans who brought wealth to so many in their country.

    6. Re:Take a hike by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I thought Trump was going to piss all over this shit with another executive order

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    7. Re:Take a hike by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      hahahaha that was good

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  2. Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    How about salary shortage? There is no shortage in engineering. Engineering in the West is a dead-end profession and you can only lie so much to young people before they study in some other field.

    https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/electrical-and-electronics-engineers.htm

    "Job Outlook, 2014-24 0% (Little or no change)"

    Engineering is for the naive.

    1. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      That's one field. The reason EE is dying is because software engineering is booming. Back 30, even 20 years ago you had a ton of people making custom ASICs for every piece of electronics. Now, processors are so cheap that there's little need for anything but a SOC solution for all but the most complex products. You still need people to build out those SOCs and embed them, but it takes a fraction of the people. All the work that was done on those ASICs is now done in software- which is still adding a ton of people.

      You can't just cherry pick one point and call it a dead end. Many of the other fields of engineering on that same website have high 20% growth.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone with an engineering degree who is not currently working as an engineer, I have found that the knowledge I gained obtaining that degree is broadly applicable to all kinds of things, both in the world of employment as well as hobbies and home life. I don't regret it for a second. Most people respect the amount of work and intelligence it takes to get an engineering degree and I've never had a problem getting interesting jobs, even if they aren't necessarily making me rich. I would do it again without hesitation.

    3. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

    4. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Considering the tens of thousands of software developers and engineers who are laid off each year by companies such as Microsoft, Google, Cisco and so on, and all the people coming into the market after graduation, I don't think that pool will ever be empty.

      What might be empty are people with the exact qualifications a company may want, but all that needs to be done is a little retraining.

      If companies insist on wanting someone with the exact, no-other-options, candidate for a position and are unwilling to offer training, they deserve to go under.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Actually, yes. Especially if the work is steady there. I worked as an Engineer in West Virginia, a decade ago. No cut in salary from DC, but my salary went a whole lot further. A real house, rather than an apartment or a townhouse. A more relaxed lifestyle.

      On the other hand, the dance club scene sucked, had to go an hour up the interstate to Morgantown and WVU, unless I wanted to do a country/western place. And you learned to rely on Amazon for anything not generally found in a Wally World or generic mall. . . (yes, we still went shopping at malls, 10 years ago. . .)

    6. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you pay enough, the workers will come. The problem isn't a labor shortage, it's companies who've been spoiled on cheap labor for so long that they offer workers peanut salaries, refuse to pay relocation costs, offer no training and shit benefits--then run to Congress begging for more H1B's when they can't find American workers.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by ems2004 · · Score: 1
      --
      ..... best things in life are not so free..........
    8. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Management. Bring your magic 8 ball for all the important decisions and you're set.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If EE is dying, then maybe I should tell my nephew and all his EE friends who have been scooped up right after graduation from U of Washington. My nephew is in British Columbia doing a Masters (all paid for), several of his friends have $100K+ jobs in the Pacific NW. Yes, they were at the top of the class in a relatively good department, but there are jobs out there. Perhaps not for everyone with a pulse but that has pretty much always been the case.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

      Well, the research triangle in NC is bound to have some people that you can attract. You're close enough to ATL which has a pretty good tech industry (not to mention GA Tech for recent grads). A little bit further west and you have Huntsville which has a ridiculous amount of PhDs (many with smart kids who probably went into tech) and Nashville which has a reputable school in Vandy. Any major college like Duke, UNC, SC, UT, Vandy, UGA, Ga Tech, Auburn, Bama, Clemson, etc will have CS programs, and many of your smaller schools in the region might have them as well. Why don't you actually try looking?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    11. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I've rarely seen people older than 30 in dance clubs. I went to Coachella when I was 32 and think I was the oldest person there besides the performers. Enjoy it while you can.

    12. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no labor shortage in engineering. It is fake, look at the universities, pushing out 10's of thousands of engineers every year. The problem is people like getting paid in the US and companies don't like paying. So they make this crap up about it, hire someone from outside the US willing to do an engineering job for pennies of what a US engineer would do it for.

      Again: there is no shortage, just cheap companies that don't want to pay its employees. e.g. the average starting salary for a mech. eng. in NYC is $35K. The average starting salary for a banker is $100K, something doesn't seem right here.

    13. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

      They are not doing away with H1-B visas. The changes are designed to prevent situations like we've seen over and over lately where a company fires their entire IT department to outsource them to Wipro or the like who fill the positions with H1-Bs. That isn't what the program was supposed to be used for and it's being abused right now.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    14. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      I was 45 at the time, and frequenting Goth clubs.

      Never said I was vanilla. Mind you, the local Country Swing-dance places, would have people in their 60s and 70s.

    15. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      "Job Outlook, 2014-24 0% (Little or no change)"

      If 1 million engineers are set for retirement and 1 million and you need 1 million to replace them what is net growth?

    16. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      It is not just that.

      I am not looking for work, but I am interested in any interesting possibilities that may be out there. I have seen several for which I am an almost perfect match for their qualifications. I have those qualifications because I have grown into them in my current job. Yet, these other companies are only willing to pay me what I am currently making.
      Why would anyone leave their current job, unless it is a complete hell-hole, for what they are currently making?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    17. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      What if those laid off don't have relevant job skills anymore?

      If companies laid off engineers that refused to learn CAD would they be laying off people that were 'highly skilled' or people that refused to adapt with the times?

      Fire up any job search engine, there are jobs out there. But you have to have relevant job skills.

    18. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      If the degree has unpaid internships have you ever considered that maybe the job prospects aren't much better?

      I didn't take a single unpaid internship in Engineering.

    19. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      +1 Score: 6

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    20. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by chipschap · · Score: 1

      University education should be less about learning specific application of facts (although there needs to be some of that) and more about learning how to learn and teach yourself.

      I found upon graduation from MIT that I and other MIT engineering grads were, in terms of ability to immediately perform specific job tasks, behind grads of numerous other schools. But after about six months in a given job that leveled out and after about a year we were way out in front. We had a solid background in the fundamentals and the ability to apply that background in new and varied situations.

    21. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by chipschap · · Score: 2

      As I understand the proposed law, you CAN bring them in from Bangalore IF you can show you can't hire them in the US ... AND you pay them a high enough wage.

      So what's it worth to you? If you want cheap labor, too bad. On the other hand if you have a critical need and you're willing to pay for it, you're good to go.

    22. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I can remember when Java didn't exist. Where did all these Java programmers come from?

      Oh, wait. They learned to program. Or they took existing programming skills and learned how to use them with the Java language.

      Companies even helped. They gave people time and training.

      So if I need Java programmers in Charlotte and I can't find them, I'll fucking create them. It's not that hard.

    23. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Shit, it's finding dance clubs with people under 40 that's the issue here. Even in my mid 40s I'm too frequently the youngest person in the room.

      Sure, some of the ladies can really seriously properly dance. Better than me. Doesn't quite compare with a sexy 30yo wriggling against you though.

    24. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Umm, remote??? Good enough for off shoring, why not do that locally? That has always been a peeve of mine, they will readily off shore to the other side of the world, but not the next city or state? WTF??

    25. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Wait, you lived somewhere in WV where you saw Morganhole as the big city? Eeeeesh.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      If EE is dying, then maybe I should tell my nephew and all his EE friends who have been scooped up right after graduation from U of Washington. My nephew is in British Columbia doing a Masters (all paid for), several of his friends have $100K+ jobs in the Pacific NW. Yes, they were at the top of the class in a relatively good department, but there are jobs out there. Perhaps not for everyone with a pulse but that has pretty much always been the case.

      The thing about EE is, that you *do* often start out a t a high salary.....and then you almost immediately stagnate.

      But there's always the contract circuit after you pay your dues in the W2 world...you can then make some really good $$.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    27. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck, you might actually have to TRAIN SOMEONE to do the job!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    28. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      As an EE making custom silicon, I can say that the job market is very ... mixed.

      The biggest problem with the industry, as I see it, is that the jobs are geographically limited. I currently have a job in a state that I love. However, should something happen to this job, I have very limited prospects for a new job in this town. In general, chip design jobs are largely in places that I don't want to live (and generally near huge cities). California, Illinois, and New York? Nope. I wold rather panhandle. Washington/Oregon? Maybe, depends on the area, traffic, cost of living, etc. Texas? Yeah, maybe, but it is pretty hot and humid there. Florida? Yeah, I left there because of the heat, humidity, and hurricanes.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    29. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you're being paid above market wage, the company will expect they can find someone else cheaper - but may still make you a lowball (for you) offer above market, since they've already invested effort in you.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    30. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Wisp · · Score: 1

      +1 Score: 9

    31. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      As I understand the proposed law, you CAN bring them in from Bangalore IF you can show you can't hire them in the US ... AND you pay them a high enough wage.

      That was the old law, it just wasn't enforced. Ever.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Florida? Yeah, I left there because of the heat, humidity, and hurricanes.

      Don't forget alligators and FloridaMan.

    33. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think I'd go into medicine.

    34. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by Type44Q · · Score: 1
      Q) What has two hundred legs and twelve teeth?

      A) The front row at a Willie Nelson concert.

    35. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Hire C++ programmers and lobotomize them. Done.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    36. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      The only labor shortage in engineering is CHEAP labor. There are plenty of domestic engineers out there. They just:

      Cost more than you're willing to pay.
      or
      Don't want to live in your super high cost of living areas.

      Mix both of those together and the only folks you will find willing to do it at all is from offshore labor farms.

      Which is why they import it from India.

    37. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      You forget to mention that an engineer can start working right after finishing school, but to get even an entry level real banking job (and word real here means that 99% of tellers, bond peddlers, retail account managers do not qualify,) you need years of prior experience learning arts of the big finance world: doin blowjobs, political prostitution, ass and shoe licking, incentivised sales, creative accounting and such

    38. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      THere's definitely some. It will never go down to zero- even with SOC you need a little bit of knowledge to set it up. But its not the industry it used to be- its not experiencing growth, and it was flat to decreasing for most of a decade. But other industries in engineering are increasing.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  3. No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked a few months for a company that was stocked mostly with H1-Bs and owned and ran by Indian immigrants. The way that they abused the heck out of their own countrymen like they had imported the caste system to their little office just filled me with disgust.

    Yeah plenty of American employers abusing American employees but at least the American employees don't risk deportation if they quit, or get fired because the employer suspected them of trying to find a better job.

    1. Re:No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's part of the culture I think. A woman I volunteer with works in an office with a lot of H1-Bs. She's probably about to get laid off and she looks forward to it, as the Indians tend to treat her like garbage. As far as they're concerned women are second class citizens. With the layoff she'll be able to collect a severance and have some time to look for something better hopefully not having to deal with that bullshit.

    2. Re:No Sympathy by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I worked for a contract house that imported Indians hand over fist. (I guess they saw my resume online and snapped it up to keep up appearances of hiring Americans first. Works for me.)

      Anyway, the brought us into a room one day and explained they paid overtime (which the gigantic customer paid for) but only in excess of the 45th hour. However, they would charge for hours 41-45 anyway.

      This did not sit well with the Indian people. I have no idea what their base salaries were.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:No Sympathy by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      I worked a few months for a company that was stocked mostly with H1-Bs and owned and ran by Indian immigrants. The way that they abused the heck out of their own countrymen like they had imported the caste system to their little office just filled me with disgust.

      I have seen this first-hand and it needs to stop.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    4. Re:No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We see the same things here in Denmark as well. Some companies refused to have their IT outsourced to India so companies like Tech Mahindra had to bring in some people to work there. (they had outsourced it to a company hosting it within country borders) Their work culture is something from the 60's.

      You are doing as told, even if you know it is wrong or won't work because the guy above you said so.

      Sometimes they need to bring in skilled local people to do some of the jobs that require some independent thinking. The work climate are so poor that they have a hard time finding any, even freelancers and consultants are hard to find that will accept to work there.

      Even though they are said to be paid minimum wage, I keep hearing rumors that in reality they are paying much of it back when the money goes back to India.

      They have been doing a bit of sabotage when their bosses are having meetings with local people to fill positions to cover for their incompetence. Oops, this system broke down, now we need all hands on deck and the boss have to cancel the meeting that he just started.

      The toilets there are a mess, they have no concept of how to use them, so for the few local Danish workers that were left there, they had to open up new facilities so you had a place to use that wasn't covered en feces everywhere.

      Some of them have pages after pages of certifications from Microsoft and others, but no basic concept of how things work in a computer. It looks impressive, it is worthless.

    5. Re:No Sympathy by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      >>The toilets there are a mess, they have no concept of how to use them,

      This! A thousand times this! , why can't you? And I'm not talking about just not flushing, I think they purposely shit on the seat or even on the back(!?!) of the toilet because they've never seen one before. I have no idea how you can be paid $100,000+ a year and still have no idea how to use a toilet! A three year old can do it Then again what do you expect from a country where over 60% of the people don't have access to indoor plumbing. I feel sorry for our cleaning staff, they must see things that would make your hair curl.

    6. Re:No Sympathy by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      >>A three year old can do it, why can't you?

      I have no idea what happened there, but my rant got cut in half. :)

    7. Re:No Sympathy by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      It's highly likely that they did import the caste system.

    8. Re:No Sympathy by rfengr · · Score: 1

      Hell, mine only applies "overtime" (not real overtime, but straight time) for hours 46 through 59, and that's only for certain projects. Once you hit 60 there is nothing.

    9. Re:No Sympathy by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Caste was born when the first con-man met the first fool; http://www.petition2congress.c...

  4. MAGA by MichaelRudner · · Score: 1

    about time, even though using me to prove American skilled worker stat is not fulfilled was not helping the cause when they tech interviewed me

    1. Re:MAGA by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "If a business really can't find US-based labor for *missing skills* (I guess they don't support training their employees anymore), why not add this to any proposed bill?"

      How do you propose those companies recoup the training expense? What's to keep someone who just got training from demanding much more money or going elsewhere? There needs to be an ROI. Sure, it's not an unsolvable problem, and many companies, my own included, require some period of continued employment, or you're expected to reimburse them. That said, I've seen several people get away w/o paying them back, and the company doesn't want the legal headache of trying to push it in court.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:MAGA by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

      What they should do a charge an H1B fee which goes to the government so that hiring an H1B would be a 25% premium.

    3. Re: MAGA by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The ROI is having a greater pool of skilled labour to choose from, rather than trying to constantly outbid other companies for the same employees.

  5. "Labor Shortage" by binkless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a myth

    1. Re:"Labor Shortage" by tempmpi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a myth

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks. Proper CS is hard, you need to know tons of things about very different topics from algorithms and maths, to hardware details and interfaces. In addition problem solving and abstract thinking skills are required. Only a small fraction of people is able to do that and even if people have the talent, but are only into CS for the money, they will likely never learn enough.

      The issue with H1B is that they are justified with the real shortage of really good people, but are used to keep wages down for people doing routine, trivial tasks that can be done even by people with only so-so education and skills.

      --
      Jan
    2. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then you do this thing called "on-the-job training." Oh silly me, that would require companies invest in their employees for the long-term versus paying barebones wages to maximize executive bonuses.

    3. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

      You're not talking about a people shortage, you're talking about a training shortage. When every company hires only the top few percent and expects people on the job market to train themselves whilst unemployed that's what happens. It's just an extension of the low wage problem. If you don't pay enough for people (whether by refusing to train them, offering a low salary, cutting back benefits, or whatever else) you don't get good people. Of all the people on the CS job market a fraction has the drive and income to train themselves while not employed. If you want that top 10% of the labor market you should expect to pay through the nose for it.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    4. Re:"Labor Shortage" by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks.

      That's why companies *USED* to actually invest in worker training. That was back when a worker was treated like a long-term asset, who would stay with the company for the long haul and be professionally developed and trained in-house. The CS or Engineering degree was just a start that got them in the door in an entry position.

      But these days, companies treat workers like disposable pens and expect them to pay for all their own training and professional development on their own time (with their shit salary and long work hours, no less). Then they wonder why they have so much turnover and can't find/keep decent workers.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks. Proper CS is hard, you need to know tons of things about very different topics from algorithms and maths, to hardware details and interfaces. In addition problem solving and abstract thinking skills are required. Only a small fraction of people is able to do that and even if people have the talent, but are only into CS for the money, they will likely never learn enough.

      And you believe that H1B IT workers brought in from India will satisfy this requirement? If so your experiences must have been vastly different from mine.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    6. Re:"Labor Shortage" by tempmpi · · Score: 1

      And you believe that H1B IT workers brought in from India will satisfy this requirement? If so your experiences must have been vastly different from mine.

      A very small number of them will, but most won't. H1Bs are abused, this needs to stop. H1Bs are not needed to bring in people with bad to mediocre skills. There is no shortage of those people. But not every usage of H1Bs is abusive and training can only help people that have the required talent.

      --
      Jan
    7. Re:"Labor Shortage" by tempmpi · · Score: 2

      You're not talking about a people shortage, you're talking about a training shortage.

      Nope. Training can help people to learn about a new language, a new operating system, etc. But if people lack the talent for abstract thought, can't write something as simple as FizzBuzz in any language of their choice, then no amount of training is going to enable them to write complex software. The issue is that Universities do not want to tell people early that they lack talent and should switch to a different profession. Then they somehow finish their CS degree and cannot find a job.

      --
      Jan
    8. Re:"Labor Shortage" by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Just like 'food shortage' is a myth.

      It's a job distribution problem. Do you do to force people to move to where the jobs are like they did during the great depression?

    9. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks.

      Wrong again. A shortage means that those people cannot be hired on the open market at any price. The real problem is that employers don't value those people enough to pay the market clearing rate.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Cederic · · Score: 1

      On the flipside I wouldn't expect a chartered accountant to be able to knock out a optimised no modulus fizzbuzz solution in any language at interview.

      I could easily train them to do that.

    11. Re:"Labor Shortage" by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It is not a myth. I'm looking for someone with a PhD in CS and 20 years experience in Windows 2016. Oh, and the job pays $20k a year.

      That I can't fill that position proves there's a labor shortage.

    12. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      The problem is that a program with limited intended use, for specific high-skill high-demand positions that can't otherwise be filled, and restrictions in place to prevent it from being used to replace American jobs, is being abused by companies (particularly the ones listed as complaining) to do exactly that.

      The way they get around this is that they are not the one "replacing" an American job. They hire people from India as employees, and then compete for and fill contract services with other corporations. It is those corporations who get rid of their American work force and replace them with the Infosys/Tata/Wipro contract workforce, that just 'happens' to be H-1B staff. See Disney, SoCal Edison, etc.

    13. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Software · · Score: 1

      People have been moving for better employment opportunities for thousands of years. Jobs which can be done remotely are the minority by a wide margin.

    14. Re:"Labor Shortage" by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      They have, but people don't. Especially these days. I can't count how many times I've seen complaints on Engineering subreddits about not being able to find a job and then when pressed they're only looking within 25 miles of Seattle or Chicago (Not known to be Engineering hot beds).

      They whine and gnash when told they may have to move to Iowa to find a job that fits their needs.

      "But I have faaamily" "But I have frieeends".. Fire up any job search engine and start looking around the country and you'll see jobs all over the place for different types of jobs that go unfilled because they people don't want to move to 'nowhere'.

      H1-Bs are already coming to a new country so Iowa looks the same as Nebraska the same as Seattle to them.

    15. Re:"Labor Shortage" by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      there are many times more IT jobs than coding jobs

    16. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Piata · · Score: 1

      Except talent is bullshit. Don't push the mythical creator nonsense where people are born with certain abilities or they aren't. What people call talent is actually a person's persistence in pursuing a skill and being passionate enough about it to become an expert. The easiest way to show this kind of progression is through visual artists: https://medium.com/@noahbradle... Artists don't wake up one day being talented, they spend decades improving their craft. The same applies to any skill, including abstract thinking. Anyone can have a talent for abstract thought, they just need the interest and dedication to improve that skill.

    17. Re:"Labor Shortage" by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      This is false reasoning.
      Success requires hard work, but hard work does not lead to success
      unless native ability (talent) is already present.
      I could practice singing 12 hours a day for the next 10 years, and I would
      still suck at singing.
      I just don't have the talent (genes) needed to be a good singer, and I never will.

    18. Re:"Labor Shortage" by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      And he must be fluent in Hindi.

  6. "Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You speak of the "U.S. labor shortage" yet I look around and see American colleagues who are stuck in dead-end positions with no raises/promotions and struggling to find anything better, and then on the floor above me is at least a couple hundred H1-Bs in positions that could easily be filled by Americans who are looking.

  7. Trump and the Democrats agree... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> bill introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat...Trump's immigration policies

    Nice to see some bipartisan agreement and action again, right?

    1. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      The fun part is Trump and the Democrat will likely support this measure and the Republicans in Congress will oppose it.

      Should make for an interesting show.

    2. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Both Republicans and Democrats are split on this. The Dems have both their working class constituencies - the ones that haven't already defected like those in MI, PA and WI, as well as their minority constituency - Indians, who still vote more heavily Democrat than Republican

      Republicans, OTOH, have the collision b/w their business interests, who want more visas, vs their own grassroots that would like to see even legal immigration curtailed until unemployment is drastically reduced

      So in all likelihood, there will be bipartisan support for both sides

    3. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      indians tend to vote more republican, is my experience. they 'like' authority and authoritarian concepts. its deep in their culture. and this aligns perfectly with R-based thoughts.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't been paying attention for the last 10 years. Democrats are the authoritarian party these days, they're the ones lining up and pushing anti-constitutional amendments. Making the claims of "safe spaces" and support ideas like no-platforming. There's plenty supporters in their base that believe violently attacking people for having opinions that they disagree with is fine. The vast majority of universities fit solidly in the democrat camp as well, and they're also right there pushing for anti-free speech, trying to implement them. In various cases student unions use harassment and threats to try and stop people from speaking. Then there's the entire Title IX garbage that was pushed through as well. And the universities fell all over themselves implementing it with nary a word against it. And now you can see the absolute abuse that's being carried on by that, and how it's used to silence people with dissenting opinions.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't been paying attention for the last 10 years. Democrats are the authoritarian party these days

      They're both authoritarian.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      indians tend to vote more republican, is my experience. they 'like' authority and authoritarian concepts. its deep in their culture. and this aligns perfectly with R-based thoughts.

      Uh, do you have any data to back that up? Everything I've seen has indicated that while there are some pockets of Indians who've moved to the right and support the GOP, the majority of them, who live mainly in NJ and CA, are still heavily (D)

    7. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Both Republicans and Democrats are split on this. The Dems have both their working class constituencies - the ones that haven't already defected like those in MI, PA and WI, as well as their minority constituency - Indians, who still vote more heavily Democrat than Republican

      Republicans, OTOH, have the collision b/w their business interests, who want more visas, vs their own grassroots that would like to see even legal immigration curtailed until unemployment is drastically reduced

      So in all likelihood, there will be bipartisan support for both sides

      First off, H1-B's cant vote. So there goes that conspiracy theory.

      Secondly, they aren't complaining about what Trump did... He left an obvious loophole open that H1-B employers are well versed in using from other countries. They're complaining about a bill put forward by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (a D strangely enough) to raise the minimum H1-B salary to US$130,000. At the moment, they can invent fees and charges to reclaim most of the current salary, but it's going to get a bit hard to hide when they're trying to take $100,000 from a $130,000 salary.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      To answer my own post, if you want to reduce the flow of cheap labour whilst reducing the flow of jobs overseas there is only one way to do it.

      Legalise and regulate.

      Put simply, you cant stop it so dont even try. Split the H1-B (or 457) class visa into two. Once class for actually skilled immigration, the other for temporary workers.

      The first class for the highly skilled. I.E. if a lab wanted to bring in a German scientist, this class is for people who can stand on their own merits and can demonstrate a competency by demand. You can put in weighted metrics (I.E. a degree from somewhere like the UK more than one from Spain which is worth more than Indonesia or India, as would work experience). For this class there must be a demonstration of skills and should either come with or lead to permanent residency.

      The second class, this is for the H1B abusers. Those who want to bring in cheap labour. Restrict the jobs they can apply for, set a hard cap on the number of visas (no advance applications and once they're gone, they're gone) and charge a $10,000 fee per application (that's application, not granted visa) to be paid by the hiring employer (not the recruiter) and limit of no more than 12 months, after which the worker needs to leave the country before applying for another visa even if it's a permanent residency.

      Regulating it is the only effective way of curtailing it. However no-politician will ever go for it because you'd get the "they turk ur jerbs" crowd's knickers in a knot despite the fact you will get less H1B abuse... Not to mention that businesses that like cheap labour will oppose it tooth and nail.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Responding to both your posts here

      H1Bs currently can't vote, but most of them aim to become citizens over time - by having their employers file their green cards and ultimately becoming citizens. Once they do, who do you think they're more likely to support - the politicians who made it easier for them to get where they ended, or harder?

      I've argued that aside from H1B, the OPT authorizations - something that F1 visa holding students are allowed to do for a year or two - convert directly to green cards. These people have US degrees, and are more likely to be exposed solely to the US work culture, rather than Indian or any other. In fact, not just US work culture, but US culture, and be more likely to assimilate - something that has been at issue w/ immigration. Not something that people who've been working for years in India and suddenly brought here are likely to do.

      Your other 2 ideas are fine. Split the visas - make the H1Bs actually for people who have the skills in question, and put in the criteria you've mentioned. The other one - for the companies that claim that they legitimately can't find the people - assign them the temporary visas, and then let them decide whether they want to bring them in, or just have them work remotely from the Bangalore office, and just come on occasion when the clients need them

    10. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Another point I forgot to mention in my earlier mail just above - Trump's immigration plans - both legal and illegal - have been written by Jeff Sessions, who preferred him over Ted Cruz. While Trump does have Indian business associates, they are in India's real estate sector, not in IT, so they're not gonna push him to make these changes

    11. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You might want to stick your nose out of your safe space sometime.

      Trump is as authoritarian a President as we've had in my lifetime. Before Trump, the parties were roughly equally authoritarian. By "anti-constitutional amendments" do you mean laws that violate the Constitution? Plenty of those from all around. As far as safe spaces go, I don't see much of a difference. Trump wants the theater to be a safe space for neo-Nazis, and right-wing football fans apparently don't want anyone to spout off with a trigger gesture before a football game. I think I know what you're trying to say with the "plenty supporters" sentence, but you don't distinguish it from, say, Tea Partiers lashing out at moderate Republicans. As far as anti-free-speech goes, all sides want to use social pressure to condition people's speech. For every leftist saying that you shouldn't arbitrarily insult people, there's a right winger claiming that "Happy Holidays" is anti-American.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Oh no! My body shop will close! by mveloso · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now we know who's abusing the H1B visa program - the ones who complain the loudest.

    We offshore our India team, so we won't be affected by the H1B changes. But the body shops here will be decimated, which is probably going to be a good thing.

    1. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by ems2004 · · Score: 2

      It is not hard to stop the abuse but why let it happen in the first place? H1B should be classified as temp visa which can not be used as pathway to greencard. Max limit should be 3 years. Any one who ever used H1B should be barred from ever applying for US immigration. All the abuse will stop over night.

      --
      ..... best things in life are not so free..........
    2. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How effective are you then in keeping your workforce, given that offshoring companies are a dime a dozen in India - not just the HCLs, the TCSs and the Wipros, but also really small ones like Zensar, CSS Corp, Mindtree, Syntel, et al who are often ready to lure them? Or have you found some happy median b/w what would keep them from bolting and what you would have paid an US employee here?

    3. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by ghoul · · Score: 1

      There are no other paths open for legal immigration for non white folks. During the time when any tom dick and harry could immigrate it was kept closed so that only white people could immigrate. When it was opened up to non white people it was choked with country limits and also no more general immigration allowed - only company based and family based which are backed up by decades. The only feasible way for Indians to immigrate is come on an H1, prove they can do the work and have someone sponsor a GC for them. If you shut off the H1-GC pathway you basically want to keep Brown people out. America was built by immigrants. What white immigrants did, brown immigrants do too. Whites went through a 7 year indenture, browns are going through a 6 year H1B. Not much has changed.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      H1B visas are already temp visas. They last three years, and can be renewed once (yielding a total of 6 years).

      Most H1B visa holders to not permanently emigrate to the US.

    5. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      That's strange. I'm sure America has a rich multicultural and multiracial heritage.

      Right now a white person wanting to emigrate to America has exactly the same options as a non-white person. Should the H1B visa scheme end, a non-white person would have exactly the same options for emigrating to America as a white person.

      Reality appears to have completely disregarded your ignorant rant.

    6. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Now we know who's abusing the H1B visa program - the ones who complain the loudest.

      We offshore our India team, so we won't be affected by the H1B changes. But the body shops here will be decimated, which is probably going to be a good thing.

      This wont happen.

      First off, they're not even complaining about Trumps exec order, they're complaining about a bill put forward by Californian Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (and I wonder who her party is) to raise H1B salaries to US$130,000.

      Secondly body shops wont close under Trumps exec order because they only have to demonstrate they tried to hire an American. This is the situation in Australia, a company that wishes to hire Australia's equivalent of a H1-B (Visa subclass 457 or just 457 for short) has to demonstrate that there isn't a sufficiently skilled Australian for the job. They do this by creating a job description that no one in reality can meet (I.E. 10 years experience with Windows 2012 in a production environment), of course no Australian could meet this and that part of the bargain is fulfilled. So now they get their Indian on a 457 who just coincidentally works for far less than an Australian.

      They're not complaining about Trump's plan because it was all for show. He left the same loophole wide open for them and companies like Tata and Infosys have a lot of experience at abusing it.

      The best case scenario here is that the jobs for H1-B's in the future will just be shipped overseas, again in the best possible scenario to another developed nation where Indians can be imported. However the most likely scenario is for Americans to be shipped offshore to head up Indian teams.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  9. Thanks, Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After the dot com bust, I read a study that predicted that the IT industry will have 1M+ job openings by 2030 because baby boomers will have retired by then and foreign workers will stay home to pursue a middle class lifestyle. That prompted me to go back to school to learn computer programming on a $3,000 tax credit that George W. signed into law after 9/11. People thought I was crazy to go into computers when health care became the new money major. Fast forward 16 years later... I'm enjoying my career in IT support, making more money and paying more in taxes. Looking forward to making more money and paying more in taxes as the baby boomers retire and foreign workers stay home in the next 13+ years.

    1. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Senior care.

    2. Re:Thanks, Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Senior care.

      I had several friends who abandoned computers for healthcare after the dot com bust. They make more money than I do today but they hate their jobs because all they do is wipe asses and change bed pans. Some of my best paying IT contracts has been hospitals. Go figure...

    3. Re:Thanks, Trump! by unixisc · · Score: 2

      They should introduce bidets in this country

    4. Re:Thanks, Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should introduce bidets in this country

      Google has bidets in their restrooms. Great when they work. When they don't work, I find my balls touching the ice cold water in the bowl and my ass catching fire from a bad heating element in the seat. That's no way to take a shit.

    5. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Cederic · · Score: 2

      If somebody is so infirm that they are unable to go to the toilet, why would a bidet help? Do bidets include some magical teleportation device that takes you from your bed to the toilet, waits for you to take a shit then switches you to the bidet so you can wash your arse before you're dropped back off in bed again?

      Or did you just utterly fucking fail to understand the point being made?

    6. Re:Thanks, Trump! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      My point was that once the bidet is used to clean the butt of the patient, the nurse gets to wipe a (relatively) cleaner butt, instead of the dirty one to start w/. I wasn't thinking about someone who's so infirm that s/he's unable to get to the bathroom

    7. Re:Thanks, Trump! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      This actually is a good job to automate - people will be better off for it

    8. Re:Thanks, Trump! by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      ... and my ass catching fire from a bad heating element in the seat. That's no way to take a shit.

      Now there's a workmans comp claim if I've ever seen one. "Your honor, creimer's ass-hair caught on fire due to a poorly maintained bidet"

    9. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I clearly failed to understand the additional use case involving the mobile but inflexible patient.

      Bedpans was the cue.

      However, I'm pretty confident that a bidet will not, with no assistance, remove the need for carer attention to the bottom area, so it's an expensive and potentially uncomfortable way of taking a few seconds off a continued unpleasant task.

  10. Re:This is a good thing by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    According to Alec Baldwin on Saturday Night Live, Pence will be president in two months. So far... right on schedule.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_Gf0mGJfP8

  11. Self serving anyone ? by nomad63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "unfairly target some of its members" ??? Are they kidding ? What about their sham operations unfairly replacing American workers ? And "it will not solve US Labor shortage" ?? Again which labor shortage ? The one where people refuse to work for poverty range salaries, whereas the 4 Indians crammed into a one bedroom apartment sharing one car, making 40% less than the American worker they are replacing ? That is not called a labor shortage. It is called slave driving. All those infosys, tata, wipro, etc companies can go to hell as far as I am concerned.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
    1. Re:Self serving anyone ? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      These Limited Liability holding corporations aren't made out of money.

    2. Re:Self serving anyone ? by NewYork · · Score: 1
  12. Re:Does this bill mean.... by naughtynaughty · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has nothing to do with Permanent Residents, they aren't here on H-1B visas

  13. Re:This is a good thing by skids · · Score: 1

    Well, as long as they don't screw it up, either accidentally or on-purpose. I'd wonder what "loopholes" are being referred to.

  14. Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zerofoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Time and time again we hear how this technical talent simply doesn't exist here in the US and we need to go abroad to find it.

    If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

    Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

    1. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      Probably because their home country lacks a middle class to bridge the gap between the poor and the rich. Without a middle class there are no consumers to buy advance products.

      Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

      You're wrong about that. It takes a lot of determination to rise up against societal norms, get an education and leave their home country. Those workers who come to the United States are more likely to be the ones who starts new companies in their home country.

    2. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those workers who come to the United States are more likely to be the ones who starts new companies in their home country.

      bullshit.

      I have lived in the bay area for over 25 yrs and have 'trained my replacements' countless times.

      indians who are brought here to work at the likes of intel, cisco, apple, fb, twitter and so on - they are not any smarter than the avergage local IT guy. they are not horrible people but they are not special, either, and this is the whole point - you can find 'regular old IT people' anywhere and you don't have to fly them in from india and china (why is china not mentioned, btw? lots of h1b's are from all over asia, not just india).

      you won't find regular people starting new companies.

      now, at the smaller 100 person startups (I'm at one now) you CAN find folks from india who are the best in their field. but these are not h1bs! they are indians who came to the US and now live here with intention of staying. we have some really good engineers from india at my place, but when I was at cisco (etc) - it was nothing special and everyone was mediocre, at best, there. and the place was FLOODED with folks from india; you would go a whole day and not hear english spoken in the hallways (cisco is famous for that, sadly).

      the best and brightest don't need sponsors such as h1b to get them here; their own intelligence will get them regular jobs. h1b is entirely just to displace local workers with cheap labor AND THAT'S ALL IT WAS EVER MEANT TO BE.

      the jig is up, guys. and its about time! I hope its real, this time, though. something tells me that the orange haired monkey that is now running this country will not really care much about US; and he'll do whatever he wants to make himself better off. the rest of us, I seriously doubt he has our best interests at heart. not a republican big businessman. those are the very people that exclusively abuse this program and benefit directly from it!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home?

      Because in their home-land they can't seem to figure out how to build their own countries like the United States did with a lot of hard work and time. It's much easier to just come to the United States and reap the benefits of all that hard work and siphon back to their respective home lands. Let's take Iraq for instance. The Sunni, the Shiites and the Kurds have been more concerned about killing each other over religious beliefs than they have been about building up their country's infrastructure to actually provide positive benefits for their citizens. In other words: they can't get their shit together so they come here because we can.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    4. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the jig is up, guys. and its about time! I hope its real, this time, though. something tells me that the orange haired monkey that is now running this country will not really care much about US; and he'll do whatever he wants to make himself better off. the rest of us, I seriously doubt he has our best interests at heart. not a republican big businessman. those are the very people that exclusively abuse this program and benefit directly from it!

      IMHO, the risk is that the general Trump persona and the over-the-top reaction to everything he does will render his potentially useful actions ineffective, and worse, possibly poison issues like H1-B as just another aspect of a racist nationalist agenda, making positive change on that issue impossible.

      It's utterly clear that the globalist/transnationals completely support mass immigration, jobs transfer, etc, whether for cynical motivation (more money for people at the top) or because it fits into some complex long-term agenda with altruistic motivations (spread the wealth, etc), so don't be surprised if/when Trump fails H1-B will back at status quo or worse when the globalists regain control.

      As for Trump's personal motivation, I'm never quite sure on this. It's easy to align him with the usual cadre of rich corporate types, but I sometimes suspect that Trump himself doesn't feel like he fits into that crowd as a natural member, which is why he tries so hard and often comes off as a tacky and nouveau riche. He has to flout his wealth harder to prove he belongs.

      Bottom line, he may not be motivationally aligned with traditional corporate interests or may not feel like he has to tow their line.

    5. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      Time and time again we hear how this technical talent simply doesn't exist here in the US and we need to go abroad to find it.

      It's propaganda from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Why do you think they are so upset with Trump's policies and have been taking to twitter and all kinds of other PR campaigns to smear him? They stand to lose a lot of money if the playing field changes. Do your research, the facts are out there. It's all about the money money money.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    6. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by gtall · · Score: 2

      Threatening Trump is easy, just ask Putin. You didn't think Trump's Putin love was deep affection, did you?

    7. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Trump is no businessman in the sense of Big Business. He has no Board of Directors in his toy companies, they are strictly Mom and Pop type operations. He cannot even make good hiring decisions. You can see that by what he believes make good cabinet nominees. That is no team he's assembling, it is just some guys and gals he likes. He's in way over his head.

    8. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LOL

      Your example of American superiority is our superiourity to a country which we bombed into the stone age, kicking off a civil war with our own ignorance and greed?

      Your example demonstrates our responsibility to refugees...

      That said, we have no similar responsibility to enable H1-B abuse...

      I'll grant you this, we did have military operations in Iraq and the Middle East in general in recent times but you can't make that the scapegoat for The Middle East's complete and utter incompetence. The killing that I'm referring to has been going for 1000+ years way before the United States ever existed. Sorry, try again. Learn history if you want to join the discussion. At least America supports religious freedom instead supporting coerced Theocracy to the point that if you leave the Theocratic faith, you will be executed. The Middle East makes its own self look stupid without Americans or anyone else having to point it out.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    9. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      Deep affection for cheap and quick political posturing.

    10. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

      I worked with a very talented Indian professional once. He said that the best professionals on this country just don't leave the country. He can earn exactly the same amount of money that the best Europeans and Americans ones, and spend it on a incredibly cheaper one. There's no bad place if you are rich enough, and a middle class salary from USA or Europe makes you rich in India.

      So, yeah. You appear to be right. The ones that stays home appear to be the better ones, so the ones that emigrate should be the less qualified (or competent) ones.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    11. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by e3m4n · · Score: 2

      actually I think its more propaganda from Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Micro$oft. Its hard to buy that next-worlds-most-expensive-luxury-yacht if you have to actually pay your programmers what they are worth.

    12. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by ghoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Trump got handed over 100 million dollars from his daddy. Had he put it into a bank FD it would now be worht 5 Billion dollars. Trump is currently worth 4.5 Billion. Thats how good a businessman he is, he cannot beat the returns on a fixed deposit. His daddy and his granddaddy were good businessmen but then they were immigrants 1st and 2nd generation - If you want something done right get an immigrant to do it.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    13. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      "Cant figure out how to stop the religious wars in their homelands so come to America to reap its Bounty" Sounds like the Pilgrims.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    14. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      actually I think its more propaganda from Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Micro$oft. Its hard to buy that next-worlds-most-expensive-luxury-yacht if you have to actually pay your programmers what they are worth.

      Oh that's nothing. Brace yourself. Here is the US Chamber of Commerce directory. Push the Search Directory button with no criteria. Notably on this list:

      • Hong Kong - See People's Republic of China
      • U.S. Department of Commerce China Gateway
      • U.S.-India Business Council
      • U.S.-Korean Business Council
      • U.S.-Pakistan Business Council

      And that's just the tip of the iceberg. It seems there's are a lot of non-American interests in the "U.S." Chamber of Commerce.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    15. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Why would selling technological products at home be a requirement? It's a global economy.

      The global economy is the U.S. and Europe, both of which have established middle classes.

    16. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Trump is an odd duck and I think a product of celebrity culture as much as anything. If you would have looked at him ten years ago, his public positions and political beliefs would paint him fairly squarely as a Democrat, or at least a New York Democrat. He may also be narcissistic enough that he only really cares about himself and the rest of the big business fat cats don't rate any special treatment from him, or even though he's part of those circles he doesn't feel any tribal loyalty towards them.

      News media (or at least the liberal-leaning part of it) will demonize everything he does, but that's hardly new. Some probably just want to peddle controversy so anything will be spun so as to be more dramatic than it really warrants. It just seems like an abrupt change because we've had 8 years of Obama presidency, but there were plenty of people or publications that were doing the same throughout Obama's term and talking about how everything he did was somehow ruining the country. You probably just never saw any of that because you didn't go looking for it or tune in to those programs. If you mostly view content that slants to the left, you would expect it to be as harsh towards the previous administration.

      Perhaps Trump has realized that it doesn't really matter what you say or do, as the country is so divided (and actively seeks out reinforcement for that division) that there's always going to be a group that will spin things in his favor as much as there will be a group that spins things against him. Such a system doesn't reward integrity, decorum, or anything really. Maybe a Trump presidency and all the cavalier, politically incorrect shit-slinging is what it takes for us to collectively evaluate what brought us to this point and make a change so that those attributes are valued and rewarded. Otherwise I suspect that in enough time we'll remember back to a time when the Trump-Clinton election was a civil affair compared to the current clown posse and their shenanigans.

    17. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      I'm coming around to the thought that Trump's persona is about the only thing that could break the logjam. Every other Republican has eventually been beaten down by a hostile media, and an opposition party that acts as if it is in charge even when it isn't. His strategy has been pretty easy to understand - drive the opposition so crazy that they make stupid errors, while tossing really substantial moves into the mix that go unnoticed in all the noise. Trump acts like the lightning rod while his staff actually does the real behind-the-scenes political work appears to be the way it's working out.

      Note that many of his moves are actually aimed at driving wedges between various components of the opposition's coalition, while beating down corrupt players in the GOP. He seems to be building a new center-right coalition, and it appears to be working.

    18. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Pilgrims were puritan assholes too obnoxious for even the English to tolerate. British religious wars were over by then, except in Ireland.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by swb · · Score: 1

      I do think that the biggest mistake his critics make is assuming he's following the standard playbook. They say "he's doing X wrong" without realizing he's abandoned that playbook.

    20. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by m00sh · · Score: 1

      Time and time again we hear how this technical talent simply doesn't exist here in the US and we need to go abroad to find it.

      If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

      They cannot build world-class companies in India because India does not have the solid institutional and infrastructure to allow for that. There is too much corruption, the markets aren't there, the investment isn't possible and so on.

      It used be the same problem with China about 10 years ago. They solved the problem and are creating world-companies left and right. In some metrics, they are even overtaking the US.

      Just from statistics, foreign technologists combined with US infrastructure and institutions create more companies. There might be many causes to this. One of them is that US filters immigrants so that it chooses exactly the kind of people that would benefit to come to the US.

  15. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Qzukk · · Score: 2

    and entitled to work in the country?

    Yes, it's legal in the US to not hire people who are not entitled to work in the country.

    If Congress passes (and the President signs) a law changing who is entitled to work here, then the employers must also deal with that.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  16. Re:OMG by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    When management can pay $20,000 a year to a worker in the Philippines to write code, what incentive is there for me to learn how to write code? I can't beat $20,000 a year.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  17. Re:Does this bill mean.... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    1. It is not the corporations making/changing the law. So it cannot be their fault even *if* it was determined to be discrimination (it won't)
    2. It is the H1B that is needed in order for them to live and work in the US... they wouldn't need the H1B visa if they were permanent legal residents
    3. FTS states that the Bill will effectively double the minimum wage requirement in order to make it less cost effective to bring "talent" from another country. That is applying the same requirement despite country of origin so it cannot be racial discrimination.

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  18. Re:OMG by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

    Americans farm out a lot of stuff, ranging from making our clothes to picking our tomatoes.

    It has nothing to do with Americans not knowing how to do something but rather Americans aren't really interesting in sewing shirts in a sweatshop or picking tomatoes in the hot sun. So we hire people who are willing to do those things.

    Not really any different than my hiring my maid to clean my house for $3/hr so I can do something more enjoyable.

  19. HB-1 abuse by davidwr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pro-open-borders (subject to individual background checks) but if you are going to have a system like HB-1 visas that are nominally only supposed to be used when a US citizen or permanent resident can't be found, you need to do it right.

    This means making it very difficult to "game" the system so that you can hire a foreigner for $60K to do a job that "looks like" a $60K job on paper but is really a $65K (or $165K) job with a low-ball salary designed to make American candidates look elsewhere.

    A partial fix is to do what Trump is suggesting: Have much-higher minimum salaries. If the minimum salary is $130K, you still may have "low ball" job offers of $130K for a job that is really a $200K position, but at least most mid-level and fresh-out-of-college techies won't have to compete with non-Americans for jobs in America.

    They will still have to compete with jobs that will go overseas (and SOME will if hiring foreigners gets harder), which is one reason I'm for open borders when it comes to employment.

    Personally, I would replace all work visas with a general work visa available to anyone who can pass a background check, but I would charge the employee a significant surtax on all income (probably 10% or so) with the funds directed to career-education and -retraining programs for American unemployed workers with any leftover money directed to K-12 and secondary education programs.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:HB-1 abuse by Goldsmith · · Score: 2

      Well, that's an interesting system you're suggesting. It's very similar to what we have now in science. Anyone who can pass a background check can be employed on a student visa (even if they're not a student) at a university. (For scale, universities in the US raise and spend slightly more money on research annually than the total annual funding for startup companies in the US.) So the research labor market is very much an open, worldwide competition, with a lot of people and a lot of opportunity. Allowing universities to do this also builds in the "train your replacement" approach, which is done enthusiastically in this context. This also means the average salaries are very low for positions that can be filled this way ( anything under a tenure track professor position). While I worked at a university, we had a number of homeless scientists working on campus (I was one for a few months). It was interesting and very bohemian, but not what I would call economically fair.

    2. Re:HB-1 abuse by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The problem is 60K may be low on the west coast for IT but H1Bs are also used to hire nurses and teachers in the midwest. 60K is pretty high over there. Hence the concept of prevailing wages. The H1Bs at our company are paid from 85-130K in the Bay Area. Not Google salaries but still more than the median salary of the Bay Area. With a 2 earner household even at the lower end 170K household income does allow you to buy a house and live the American dream. Yes Bachelors do share apartments. They do so to save up money for Downpayments but also to have some social safety net as they dont have family here- roommates become a pseudo family.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:HB-1 abuse by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      They will still have to compete with jobs that will go overseas (and SOME will if hiring foreigners gets harder), which is one reason I'm for open borders when it comes to employment.

      You just made a very big jump from losing a few jobs overseas to completely open borders. First, many jobs cannot be outsourced like IT can. Open borders will force carpenters, farmers, cashiers, truckers and many other professions into competition with 3rd-world wages. This will affect tens of millions of jobs.

      Second, open borders with India and China will mean the US will become the most populous country in the world in a few short years. The homeless in the US live better than the average do in those countries. All of our social services like food stamps, unemployment benefits, medicare, schools, police and utilities will collapse under the weight of having to serve 5 times the number of people they were built to serve.

    4. Re:HB-1 abuse by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The problem is 60K may be low on the west coast for IT [...]

      Dell was paying $12.50 per hour plus mileage for techs to drive 500 miles around Silicon Valley. That's about $25K per year.

    5. Re:HB-1 abuse by ghoul · · Score: 1

      You are confusing techs who swap out machines with software developers. IT is a very broad field. And no H1B can be paid 25K. Prevailing wages in Santa Clara County are 70K minimum. Companies will not bother with an H1B for a 25K job as the H1 process itself costs 10K+

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    6. Re:HB-1 abuse by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing techs who swap out machines with software developers. IT is a very broad field.

      I don't have much experience in dealing with devops — except for cleaning up their messes.

  20. Re:Does this bill mean.... by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I am no fan of the Dems, but does this bill say anything beyond the visas in question? In particular, does it say anything about the countries of origin, being tougher on Indians than they might be on, say, Romanians or Swedes?

  21. Long overdue by qQ7eBMsfM5gs · · Score: 1

    India's IT has been devaluing our skills and jobs for many years, it's about time somebody does something about it.

  22. Re:What are they gonna do? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    The amount of needful that will get done could drop as much as 15%.

  23. There is no labor shortage in tech. by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a shortage of below minimum wage labor within our borders.

    Call centers tend to be run as sweat shops to squeeze as much tech work out of as minimally qualified people as possible for a little pay as they can offer to get them to show up to work. India was the solution to pay even less to get equally unqualified work.

    The problem with tech isn't the lack of people willing to work tech, there's thousands of reasonably good techs that are jobless in every major city. It's the way companies view tech. Bean counters see tech as a pure expense since I.T. rarely brings money into the company directly. The job of I.T. is to enable everyone else in the company to bring money in. Sadly I.T. is seen as the equivalent to cleaning staff or the electrician that had a job to do but never left by many organizations. This view of I.T. is part of why so many companies that shun tech are often caught without good backups and easily fall prey to ransomware. At least ransomware makers are profiting from the mindset.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  24. What about Non-H1-B Salaries by Dust038 · · Score: 1

    I would love a default doubling to our salaries (Though an important note is that is would not be close to 130,000). I might be bias that I am in Illinois, but you all probably know our situation right now. How are employer's saving money with this? or even before this? I don't have too much knowledge on what else that 130,000 or H1-B in general entails so if someone could fill me in on that, that'd be awesome.

    1. Re:What about Non-H1-B Salaries by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Right now your salary is low because you are competing for jobs with people in India due (in part) to the H1-B visa scheme. Your employer can hire an Indian for $60k; you end up earning $60k because otherwise you don't get the job, the Indian does.

      If the cost of employing someone from India (or indeed, anywhere else) was $130k then you could demand $80k, or indeed anything up to $130k (subject to skills availability in your area) and still be a better choice for your employer than the person on a H1-B visa.

      The employer is going to spend more money on staff either way, they're going have a resultant impact on their cost base and their profitability, but the average salary for your skillset will rise and you will earn more.

      The downside is that if your salary rises too high, you start competing again with Indians but this time not through the H1-B visa scheme. Your employer just offshores (or outsources) your job and someone working in India does it.

      Luckily outsourcing software development has been demonstrated to be extremely flawed and problematic, but offshoring is very viable and likely to become more popular with US companies.

  25. Re:OMG by johanw · · Score: 2

    Is that why there are so many Americans working 3 burger flipping jobs just to keep alive and pay the rent?

  26. Boo Hoo by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    *word's smallest violin*

    H1B Visas are meant to supplement not replace U.S. workers and yet it's the outsourcing firms that get the largest number of Visas.

    Build up your own fucking economy ass-hole.

  27. India has everything to lose by zifn4b · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can make claims about freedom of religion and all this other nonsense but this issue is about economics, pure and simple. What's being proposed is that incentives to hire people outside of the United States who have no interest in the success of the United States to do the same job for half the wages be greatly lessened. Also, I can tell you from direct experience in the software industry, Indian contractors produce lower quality code, break more builds, have poor communication and many other things that lead to worse quality software. I can't tell you how many times I traced build breaks back to Indian contractors. The only benefit to hiring them is that they cost less.

    Before you call me a racist, I have high respect for other cultures and enjoy their cuisine a lot. I love Indian food and I think Indian people in general are pretty cool. What I don't like is when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is throwing all the American citizens under a bus by hiring less skilled workers for a much cheaper price at the expense of American citizens so they can turn even bigger profits when the corporations the Chamber is comprised of are already sitting on vast piles of wealth. It's really a slap in the face. They've taken advantage of the Land of Opportunity so much that it is no longer the Land of Opportunity.

    The U.S. Chamber brought this on themselves. They gamed the system too hard and caused a lot of hardship to good, hard-working Americans and that's why this backlash has occurred.

    --
    We'll make great pets
    1. Re:India has everything to lose by houghi · · Score: 1

      people outside of the United States who have no interest in the success of the United States

      The interest of thos inside will most likely be with themselves and not so much with the USofA. Otherwise they would not hire people from outside the US.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:India has everything to lose by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      Before you call me a racist, I have high respect for other cultures and enjoy their cuisine a lot. I love Indian food and I think Indian people in general are pretty cool. What I don't like is when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is throwing all the American citizens under a bus by hiring less skilled workers for a much cheaper price at the expense of American citizens so they can turn even bigger profits when the corporations the Chamber is comprised of are already sitting on vast piles of wealth. It's really a slap in the face. They've taken advantage of the Land of Opportunity so much that it is no longer the Land of Opportunity.

      I hear you. One of my former colleagues was an Indian and he was a very skilled Java developer, and believe me I have high respect for anyone that can manage to work with Java skillfully and yet remain sane. He was pretty cool too but I guess he was skilled enough that he found better opportunities, so it's not that Indians are inherently bad as may be implied but rather its just poor training and low standards that hold back their potential as individuals.

    3. Re:India has everything to lose by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      I hear you. One of my former colleagues was an Indian and he was a very skilled Java developer, and believe me I have high respect for anyone that can manage to work with Java skillfully and yet remain sane. He was pretty cool too but I guess he was skilled enough that he found better opportunities, so it's not that Indians are inherently bad as may be implied but rather its just poor training and low standards that hold back their potential as individuals.

      That may be so but it's not the United States' responsibility to educate the entire planet. It's the responsibility of the individual to be motivated to get their own education to raise their own standard of living. If suitable education does not exist in India, create it. The United States started out at rock bottom and got somewhere in 250 years-ish. The United States population is 318.9 million. India's population is 1.252 billion. India outnumbers us 4-to-1. You mean to tell me that I need to elevate India's standard of living when they are perfectly capable of buying books on Amazon and Alibaba and educating themselves and then spreading said education to their population? That's nonsense.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    4. Re:India has everything to lose by m00sh · · Score: 1

      You can make claims about freedom of religion and all this other nonsense but this issue is about economics, pure and simple. What's being proposed is that incentives to hire people outside of the United States who have no interest in the success of the United States to do the same job for half the wages be greatly lessened. Also, I can tell you from direct experience in the software industry, Indian contractors produce lower quality code, break more builds, have poor communication and many other things that lead to worse quality software. I can't tell you how many times I traced build breaks back to Indian contractors. The only benefit to hiring them is that they cost less.

      Before you call me a racist, I have high respect for other cultures and enjoy their cuisine a lot. I love Indian food and I think Indian people in general are pretty cool. What I don't like is when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is throwing all the American citizens under a bus by hiring less skilled workers for a much cheaper price at the expense of American citizens so they can turn even bigger profits when the corporations the Chamber is comprised of are already sitting on vast piles of wealth. It's really a slap in the face. They've taken advantage of the Land of Opportunity so much that it is no longer the Land of Opportunity.

      The U.S. Chamber brought this on themselves. They gamed the system too hard and caused a lot of hardship to good, hard-working Americans and that's why this backlash has occurred.

      No, H1B reform doesn't solve the problem of hiring people outside the US for cheaper than US employees. It just makes it that they cannot be here in the US. They can still work in Bangalore.

      Cheap labor is not going anywhere. The millions of Indian engineers are not going to become farmers next. Restricting H1B just makes room for outsourcing directly to India. It gives firms in the US that can manage labor force in India from the US a huge business opportunity.

      You'll still have outsourcing, just a different flavor of it. You won't see Indians in the hallway but they will still writing code for cheap.

    5. Re:India has everything to lose by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      You mean to tell me that I need to elevate India's standard of living when they are perfectly capable of buying books on Amazon and Alibaba and educating themselves and then spreading said education to their population? That's nonsense.

      No, I never once said that nor do I believe that we need, or should, do anything about it. We got our own problems here to deal with enough as it is without importing other nation's problems.

  28. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are hiring someone in the US for $3 an hour you are a monster. I hope you are exaggerating, otherwise please take a second to think of how you are devaluing human life and decency.

    It isn't that American's "don't want to do the job" it's that they "don't want to the job for a non-living wage".

    12 hours a day for $3 an hour isn't going to pay for any type of decent living condition in America. Acting like a feudal lord and being oh-so-beneficent as to allow the peasants to work for peanuts isn't something we should aspire to. The idea of a job-creator class is a joke. People should be ashamed for treating other humans like this.

    We can, and should, do better.

  29. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Refuse to tell us how to reboot our Dells?

    When I worked on the Google IT help desk in 2008, I had to walk a newly hired computer science graduate on how to TURN ON his workstation. He actually expected to find someone standing to turn on the workstations like they do at the university computer labs. He was shocked that he had to do manual labor.

  30. They should stay and improve their own countries by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    "It takes a lot of determination to rise up against societal norms, get an education and leave their home country."

    It sure does.

    It takes far more determination to fix the societal problems instead of fleeing them. It is not our responsibility to provide a path to middle class for the entire world. Nations must forge that path for their own people.

  31. Re:sounds like a good plan by unixisc · · Score: 1

    They don't wanna pay twice as much. When it comes to negotiating salaries for people they employ, they are extremely tight, but funnily enough, when it comes to expected salaries, they expect something near the $200k mark, if not much more

  32. What a load of garbage by Bearhouse · · Score: 2

    There's this : "imposing tougher visa rules unfairly targets some of its members and will not solve a U.S. labor shortage in technology and engineering"
    Then this : "contains provisions that may prove challenging for the Indian IT sector...nullify the objective of saving American jobs"

    So in other words, "this looks uncomfortably like it might work, so we're going to come up with a load of bullshit while we figure out a way of getting round it".

    If there is a labor shortage, surely American jobs don't need saving? Anyway, as many people here have pointed out in the past, this has nothing to do with closet racism, denying smart people with the vital skills we need the right to come and work in the US or protectionism.

    It's about unscrupulous people breaking the rules and exploiting their fellow countrymen while careless (in both senses of the word) suits look the other way.
     

  33. Let Them Cry by DaMattster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am not a Trump supporter but I am definitely anti H1-B visa and offshoring. The Indian firms are wrong as there is plenty of talent in America capable of writing excellent software. Conversely, I have seen very poor software come out of India that was not only unstable but replete with spelling and grammar errors on the user interface. Some stuff was so pooly written, that friends of mine have told me that they ended up re-writing large portions thereby negating any savings. The only reason the Indian IT firms are calling foul is because they're going to lose money and it isn't foul because the Indians engage in protectionism for their economy. They have very high import taxes .... sky high to as much as 25%. So the Indians get no sympathy from me whatsoever.

    1. Re:Let Them Cry by djbckr · · Score: 2

      I am not a Trump supporter...

      Neither am I, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. There are a few things he's done right, but by-and-large his presidency is a dumpster fire right now.

    2. Re:Let Them Cry by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      He seems to be achieving everything that he ran on. You have to separate the "noise" from the "actions" with this guy.

    3. Re:Let Them Cry by m00sh · · Score: 1

      I am not a Trump supporter but I am definitely anti H1-B visa and offshoring. The Indian firms are wrong as there is plenty of talent in America capable of writing excellent software. Conversely, I have seen very poor software come out of India that was not only unstable but replete with spelling and grammar errors on the user interface. Some stuff was so poorly written, that friends of mine have told me that they ended up re-writing large portions thereby negating any savings. The only reason the Indian IT firms are calling foul is because they're going to lose money and it isn't foul because the Indians engage in protectionism for their economy. They have very high import taxes .... sky high to as much as 25%. So the Indians get no sympathy from me whatsoever.

      It is just going to be shake-up.

      On the one hand, you have cheap Indian IT labor. They are not going anywhere.

      On the other hand, you have people looking for cheap labor to build products and write software.

      You can build enormous walls between them but they'll find a way around it. The current baddie is the H1B because that was the ladder to scale the wall. You take that away, there will be another visa to abuse, another loophole to exploit.

      This is capitalism. It flows around artificial restrictions in the market. The buyers and sellers will find a way.

      There is terrible code written all over the place, not just by Indians. They have their own type of bad code they write whereas we write our own type of bad code. Good code is not just written right away, it is bad code refined over time, refactored and tested over time.

  34. Re:Does this bill mean.... by ems2004 · · Score: 2

    This actually the cure for H1B problem that h1B holders should never be allowed to become permanent residents. That will take away the sheen from H1B program If the rules are made to only address the real shortage(which does not exist in the first place).

    --
    ..... best things in life are not so free..........
  35. Re:Does this bill mean.... by ems2004 · · Score: 1

    It IS the corporations who write ANY law in the US.

    --
    ..... best things in life are not so free..........
  36. Re:What are they gonna do? by Salgak1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's actually an improvement. In 1979, I had to teach a Pakistani student how to use a laundromat. Fellow student down the hall, he had asked me what the best way was to the river, to wash his clothes. . .

  37. Re:This is a good thing by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Okay, so you appreciate Trump for getting this moving, then wanna remove him and his VP. What guarantee do you have that anyone else you have in mind - probably from the Dem side - is gonna continue this? And Trump, as a Republican, has a better chance of standing b/w lobbyists like NASSCOM and GOP congressmen: why would any of the latter go against their lobbyist to oblige, say, a Bernie or a Pocahontas?

  38. Re:As a liberal by ems2004 · · Score: 1

    How does the new rating system work? I want to vote you up.......++5

    --
    ..... best things in life are not so free..........
  39. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Having a person to turn on the computer for you is the kind of thing you would expect in a heavily-unionized shop or a country where labor is exceedingly cheap.

    Or volunteering to run the university computer lab as a prerequisite to join the computer priesthood to protect computers from users.

  40. Re:This is a good thing by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I guess sarcasm is lost on people. I clearly read the GP as pointing out that had DJT or a GOP congressman introduced something like this, he'd have been tagged 'racist', and that Lofgren ain't being treated that way b'cos she's a Liberal

  41. Re:This is a good thing by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . .and then, if you get your way, you get President Ryan.

    I suspect you wouldn't like him either...

  42. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least your fellow student wanted to find the river to wash his clothes. Some (even US born) students lacked the understanding that clothing needed to be (at least occasionally) washed.

    Wish I could say that I have seen it improve in the past 30 years, but I still encounter at least one student a year needing this life lesson.

  43. Re:"opponents say they are using the visas..." by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, ask the poor fucks at Disney what they think about the idea that H1B's don't replace American workers.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  44. I think there's plenty of domestic talent by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I have very little problem with the original intention of the H-1B program -- giving companies a safety valve to import a small number of workers who actually possess skills that can't be found domestically. I work for a multinational and we use internal transfers a lot for that purpose...and most of the people they bring in are actually the kind of people that the program originally targeted.

    What I don't like is the abuse. Any time a company's IT costs get too high for the MBA's liking, they can turn to any number of "IT services" providers. These companies will always come in cheaper than FTEs, both from a cost and an accounting perspective. Since the company has to make money, they'll offshore most of the work and bring in a few H-1B's to displace all the FTEs over time. In places that do this, I have yet to see evidence that any of these H-1B replacements are exceptional in any way. Often, they're just swapping out a DBA or sysadmin who's been working for 20 years with a DBA who will work much cheaper regardless of quality. What bothers me more is that the company can just pull a "Pontias Pilate" and wash their hands of their entire IT department. This is what happened with the bigger swap-outs that have made the press like Disney and others. All they have to do is point to the fact that their IT is now in control of one of the body shops and they had nothing to do with replacing domestic workers.

    I have absolutely no doubt that (a) there is plenty of domestic talent, and (b) if you don't set an expiration date on people's careers, even more people will study CS and engineering. I say the program should be kept to some degree, but the obvious avenues for abuse should be shut down. My suggestions would be to crack down on the fake labor certification processes, and raise the minimum H-1B wage to a certain percentage over the average prevailing wage for the area they're going to work in. If people see that the program is fair, and don't feel like it's a serious threat for their future earnings and career, then everything will work out for employers over time. The workforce will be happier, and there won't be as much of a language/timezone barrier.

    I don't know -- maybe I've been lucky and have worked with very talented domestic people. But I don't believe companies who say they can't hire people domestically -- they just don't want to pay for it.

  45. India's IT industry is worried? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Good.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. Re:The Stopped Clock by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    If there are "No Americans" how are "more Americans riffed" every six months or so?

  47. Re:Does this bill mean.... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    Well... yes... but I think you know what I mean

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  48. Re:This is a good thing by Adambomb · · Score: 2

    Unless I misunderstand how it works in the US, if both Trump and Pence were removed from office this very moment the presidency would fall to the president pro tempore of the senate, who is currently Senator Orrin Hatch (A Republican).

    I know nothing of his politics or whether he'd be for or against h1b reform though.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  49. Re:OMG by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Umm, have you *seen* the code from such locales?

    Sure, you will have rockstars there as well (I know quite a few living in Pune - they're trying to move here), but for every rockstar, you have something like 10,000 total incompetents whose code will require a massive overhaul just to get built without fatal errors.

    Usually ends up costing more than its worth once you add it all up.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  50. Re:Let's just have a shortage by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    To increase wages, you need to...

    ... ... ... there's actually no way to do this.

    An increase in cash wages decreases the number of jobs by concentrating the same money into fewer hands. You can issue more money, increasing wages by raising product prices (if all wages go up by 10%, then all prices must go up by 10% to generate the revenue to pay the salaries); that does nothing.

    Money is just a proxy for labor. The question is really how much time you work to buy a product. If you make $20/hr and a product costs $30, you buy it with 1.5 hours of labor. If your salary goes up to $40/hr and the product now costs $60, wages haven't increased: you still work 1.5 hours to buy that product.

    Trade finds advantages (wage or technical) to reduce the price of a product, thus allowing people to buy more of that product with the same labor-hours. That makes the population of the importing country wealthier; it also increases the amount of domestic shipping and retailing, while decreasing jobs related to whatever's now being imported. The labor force rapidly adjusts to re-settle unemployment to a stable point (4.5%-5.5% in the United States).

    Technical progress is the long-term solution. This reduces labor investment. Say you and 10 people work for $20/hr and produce 20 of a given product--that product costs $20 per unit. Now we invent a new method of making it such that you and 10 people produce 40 of that product per hour. It's now a $10 product. Instead of prices falling, money is issued (mainly via debt) faster than population growth to create inflation: you now work for $50/hr, and the product costs $25.

    You might notice that the 250% increase in wages is unavoidable here if the inflation rate is 25% and the labor requirements are 50%. It's also notable that you might not have 10 workers making 40 of that product; it might be 5 making 20, and the other 5 workers... well, half your hour's wage is unspent now, so you can buy something else, and someone has to make, ship, and retail that. The jobs fill back in.

    Here's the thing: the minimum wage workers are pegged to a published minimum. If we bump them by inflation, they go from $10/hr to $12.50/hr, while you go from $20/hr to $50/hr. If we raise them by the amount of actual buying power increase the middle-class workers enjoy, then the $10/hr minimum-wage must go to $25/hr. Because you're still trading labor hours in the end, only a set amount of money can be earned in a given time, and thus a set amount can be spent, and thus a set number of jobs can exist; if wages are higher for a subset (e.g. minimum wage), then fewer jobs exist. You've got to decide the trade-off between quality of life of the poor and forcing more people into unemployment while the labor market adjusts to reduce the number of job-seekers (and eventual population) when you make the new policy.

    An economy isn't an ideal system surrounded by an infinite supply of consumers with an infinite supply of money.

  51. Re:This is a good thing by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Orrin Hatch is an old-school corporate-whore Republican who has made his position on H1B's quite clear.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  52. Re:This is a good thing by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    Its good enough for the mass media and their politically active teenagers and young adults, which is a huge target now that their last voting block is all but dead.

  53. Re:This is a good thing by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    You assume to much. He likes complaining, the conditions are always right for complaining.

  54. Ryan knows wtf he's doing by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I'd damn sure rather have Paul Ryan as President. Ryan really knows what he's doing. Trump, Pence, and Clinton have never *read* the federal budget, Paul Ryan has *written* the federal budget, more than once.

    There's a reason there was no "campaigning" for Speaker of the House this time around, why Paul Ryan was the consensus pick, even though he refused to follow tradition and do campaign appearances for the reps who voted for him. His peers wanted Ryan, without a campaign, because they know Ryan is the smartest of all of them.

    1. Re:Ryan knows wtf he's doing by lgw · · Score: 1

      We haven't had a federal budget in forever. Just continuing resolutions. Ryan is part of the problem.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  55. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    60k for a bay area job? what a joke!!!

    I make $50K+ per year and live in a studio apartment by myself in Silicon Valley. If you live a modest lifestyle, you can do well here. But if you want to pursue the American Dream of having it all (i.e., big house, big cars, big wife and big kids), you need to earn big bucks for that.

    Also sleeping on the floor?

    Some people are willing to sacrifice to achieve their goals. I've known engineers who slept on floors to save up for a down payment on a $1M+ house in Silicon Valley.

  56. Have you met any board members of large companies? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    That is no team he's assembling, it is just some guys and gals he likes

    Have you met any people that sit on the boards of large companies? I have - and I can tell you that most of these boards are made up of people that the CEO/President likes.

    Corporate governance is hardly independent in this country.

  57. THEY TOOK OUR JERBS! by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    Obligatory South Park: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Except this time it's the Indians complaining that Americans are taking their jobs. Still hilarious.

  58. Re:What are they gonna do? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    What's your point? They got an education that didn't intersect with actually running the machines. That is literally what IT is for.

    You may also be shocked to learn that most mechanical engineering grads can't rebuild their car. Most electrical engineers can't re-wire a house. As specialization increases you have people that are highly trained in one area but don't have the breadth of the 'jack of all trades' that exist in some fields.

    Next you'll be complaining your cardiologist is a terrible orthopedic surgeon. "But they're doctors, it's all pretty much the same".

  59. Re:brain gap by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Most Americans are stupid and most American Christians aren't Christians according to the Bible. Otherwise, Trump wouldn't be POTUS.

  60. Go 15% of Trump! [Re:No Sympathy] by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    stocked mostly with H1-Bs and owned and ran by Indian immigrants. The way that they abused the heck out of their own countrymen

    I worked with one visa worker who confided that he was paid only once every 6 months. He got his full amount, but had to budget carefully. I've seen other shady visa practices also.

    I don't like Trump and didn't vote for him, but on THIS issue he is right (perhaps accidentally).

    1. Re:Go 15% of Trump! [Re:No Sympathy] by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      How does Trump get credit for "a bill introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California"?

    2. Re:Go 15% of Trump! [Re:No Sympathy] by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Casteists/Racists/Terrorists should be expelled from USA https://qz.com/889524/the-us-s...

  61. Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills

    1. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills

      I've been told in a previous comment that there are CS students who are interested in CS only for the money, graduate without ever touching a computer, and then expect to get paid six-figures for knowing CS theory without ever applying it.

    2. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's possible to get a CS degree without ever using Windows, AD, a VPN, or ever hearing the term "OSI model". So, throw those people into a business with 10,000 users, all on Windows, and what could that CS grad do?

      The expectation is that a CS student would self-teach themselves IT while getting a degree in CS. That's no longer true. It seemed more true for those who got a CS degree in the early '90s (and before).

    3. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's possible to get a CS degree without ever using Windows, AD, a VPN, or ever hearing the term "OSI model".

      I'd think that's kind of given, considering that CS has nothing to do with any of those things, pretty much like biology has nothing to do with learning to fix microscopes.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      That's still $262,143 a year.

      A six figure salary in binary, now, that's a lot funnier.

    5. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be an issue, except there is no IT degree, so people hire CS graduates, expecting them to be programmers or sys admins. And you can get a CS degree without being competent in either (yes, "some" programming is required, but certainly not competency).

    6. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by kristianbrigman · · Score: 1

      The lowest six-figure salary in octal would be 100000, or only $32768...

    7. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree these are problems.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I have seen CS students nonplussed that we expected them to graduate with some knowledge of the science. Personally, I figured that if you were just interested in learning to program for the money, the MIS program was just across the river in the business school.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be an issue, except there is no IT degree, so people hire CS graduates, expecting them to be programmers or sys admins.

      When I went back to community college to learn computer programming, I was required to take an IT-related class with hands on labs for hardware, software and networking. That class was meant to prepare students for the CompTIA A+ and Network+ certifications. I had my A+/Network+ certifications prior to taking the class since my work experience as a video game tester prepared me for those certifications.

  62. US labor shortage? by drew_92123 · · Score: 2

    There is no such thing... we have plenty of people willing and able to work.

    The biggest challenge we face is that we will need to train workers to take their places... this is because India has made skilled workers so cheap in the past couple of decades that US companies has little or no incentive to hire entry level folks here in the states and train them, and individuals saw little to no value in paying for this training themselves let alone spending years in school for a job that was already taken by some goon in another country.

    1. Re:US labor shortage? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      This is an example of the breakdown of the family. Education in India is not cheap. As a ratio to annual income it is more expensive than in the US and loans are hard to get. Entire families make sacrifices to support the education of a promising kid and when that kid does well he supports his younger siblings and cousins. Thats how a poor country is able to create technically trained labor while a rich country is busy buying ATVs and Boats. Yes an Indian immigrant will work cheaper. Every immigrant works cheaper than the locals for he/she does not have choice. The local can choose to work in an industry not open to immigrants for a better salary. To Expect the govt to pay for training because your family is not willing to invest in you and make the necessary sacrifices is just another symptom of people having more loyalty to the state than to the family. Social Security started this breakdown of the family. If you no longer need to have successful children to support you in your old age you are much less willing to make sacrifices for their education. As the state becomes more and more the family at some point children will be brought up in creches like in the Soviet Union while all adults work for the glory of the state. Indian cultural values are those which America used to have while America is becoming more and more Soviet everyday.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  63. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    That is literally what IT is for.

    Uh, no. It's not IT's job to turn on your computer. The Fortune 500 companies I've worked for in the past have policies in place that prevent IT techs from running over to turn or reboot a user's workstation.

    You may also be shocked to learn that most mechanical engineering grads can't rebuild their car.

    No, but mechanical engineers should know how to turn on the ignition switch.

    Most electrical engineers can't re-wire a house.

    No, but electrical engineers should know how to turn on a light switch.

    As specialization increases you have people that are highly trained in one area but don't have the breadth of the 'jack of all trades' that exist in some fields.

    Or, as Robert Kiyosaki writes in "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," the more you specialize about something in college the less you know about everything else in real life.

    Next you'll be complaining your cardiologist is a terrible orthopedic surgeon. "But they're doctors, it's all pretty much the same".

    No, but I do expect them to turn on their workstation in the examination room without calling IT to turn it on for them. Although I've shocked a few doctors when I refused to transfer their iTunes library to a new workstation because having iTunes installed on their workstation was against hospital policies.

  64. Re:OMG by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Easy. You get to be one of the guys they hire to fix that crap code and process. EVERY project I have ever worked on with overseas code resources has had massive problems with the quality of code that is returned.

    The same cycle always holds true: First the overseas resources are given full tasks to complete. Then the returned code is total shit and doesn't do what was asked. So the tasks are broken down into smaller chunks, and those still don't work. Then the resources are asked to provide procedures and subroutines written to a rigid spec, and 70% of those finally work. Then the company realizes that they're paying experienced software engineers over here to spend hours a day breaking things into small enough chunks that the overseas people will *probably* not screw up and the amount of time wasted is enormous, plus those software engineers could just do it themselves in a fraction of the time.

    So the company stops offshoring after wasting a couple of years of time and god knows how much money.

  65. So India can't screw us over as easily now? by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    In other news, countries that have been stealing US jobs and screwing US workers for years due to imbalanced trade deals are pissed that those days are over.

    Why we in the US should be in any way unhappy that India will be less effective at stealing our jobs is beyond me.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  66. There is no labor shortage in IT by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    we dont have a labor shortage in our IT industry... what we have in an over abundance of assholes like Mark Zuckerfuck that want to pay pennies on the dollar for skilled labor while he goes and buys an other fucking island or yaht or something.

  67. Re:brain gap by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    That's not taking into account that many people can come in as a foreign student and get a college degree for free or severely reduced cost, meanwhile the skyrocketing costs of college for even in-state tuition is going further and further out of reach of many americans. If the US shored up all the foreign aid dispersal until after higher education dispersal to all that wish to have it, each year, thereby paying in foreign at only what was remaining, we would not have that gap. Before you take that first sentence and decide it is somehow selfish or nationalistic, consider this is the same forumla france employs and they give college to just about all their citizens that can pass an entry exam.

  68. Re:Does this bill mean.... by zuckie13 · · Score: 2

    Trump had nothing to do with them cutting the price of those fighters. Just because he says it does not make it true. If you actually look into it, he's taking credit for the fact that the next batch they build (90 as opposed to the initial 10), will cost less per fighter (about 6 -7 million less) than the last batch. 90x6.7 million =~ 600 million. The discussions on those costs started before he was elected....so yeah.....liar.

  69. Re:This is a good thing by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless I misunderstand how it works in the US, if both Trump and Pence were removed from office this very moment the presidency would fall to the president pro tempore of the senate, who is currently Senator Orrin Hatch (A Republican).

    I know nothing of his politics or whether he'd be for or against h1b reform though.

    Actually, it would go to Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan. President Pro-Tempre (not sure about spelling) of the Senate is #4.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  70. There is no labor shortage by JWW · · Score: 2

    There is no labor shortage.

    There is a companies willing to pay what it takes to hire someone competent shortage...

  71. Re:This is a good thing by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    Succession goes: VP, House Speaker (Ryan), President pro tempore of the Senate (Hatch), Sec. State (Shannon, a career diplomat and now just a place holder), Treasury, Defense, AG...Secretary of Homeland Security. The order of cabinet succession is based on date of the department's creation. They also have to meet the standard presidential requirements such as native born resident for 14 years and 35 years old.

  72. Re:Good for you! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    If you are a developer with over 2 years of experience, you should be making $200K - at least. Some of the guys are making over $350K.

    I'm not software developer. I work in government IT. The bad news is that I make significantly less than my Silicon Valley peers. The good news is that I work a regular 40 hour week, get the usual benefit package, paid federal holidays (40 hours), paid time off (80 hours) and unpaid time off (40 hours) per year, and I'm halfway through a five-year contract. My contracting agency gave an extra month in pay as a Christmas bonus last month.

    Wouldn't it be awesome if you were able to bank over $150K a year after tax?

    I bank 20% of my income after tax. If I moved to the Sacramento Valley, I could save up for a down payment, buy a $200K house and pay off the mortgage in 10 years.

  73. Re:This is a good thing by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    This is nothing about race. This is only about nationality.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  74. Re:What are they gonna do? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

    Well, I knew plenty of kids who dropped off laundry with Mummy and Daddy before heading out to party on a Friday night. Heck, one SHIPPED his wash back to Connecticut (College was in Pennsylvania) and he got a box of clean laundry back every week. . .

  75. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    More likely you've been fired too often and no one wants to work with you.

    The only time I ever got fired was when I was working in construction with my father and I got into a fist fight with the boss's grandson when he threatened me with a piece of rebar. That was 25 years ago. Today I'm a successful IT support contractor. Boss's grandson is a drug addict and his father closed the 60-year-old family construction business when he retired.

  76. Re:What are they gonna do? by alex67500 · · Score: 1

    Refuse to tell us how to reboot our Dells?

    When I worked on the Google IT help desk in 2008, I had to walk a newly hired computer science graduate on how to TURN ON his workstation. He actually expected to find someone standing to turn on the workstations like they do at the university computer labs. He was shocked that he had to do manual labor.

    Did you have to hold it for him when he had to go?

  77. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like he wanted to play a joke on you or someone put him up to it.

    It wasn't a joke. His help desk ticket history showed that he was a new hire without an assigned manager. He obviously fell through the cracks. Google was hiring 300+ people per week back then.

    While I believe YOU ARE NAIVE ENOUGH TO BELIEVE he couldn't understand how to turn something on, occums razor suggests it is more likely that this is a joke played on you.

    If I thought he was pulling a joke, I would have reported him to security and have him escorted off the campus.

  78. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's a different scenario entirely. He was literally unaware of laundromats because Pakistan probably didn't have them, and he was willing to do the much more manual process to clean them.

    On the other hand, the Googler was inept with the hardware that they reasonably should have understood. How one makes it to your first job, circa 2008, without turning on a workstation is astounding.

  79. Re:What are they gonna do? by admin7087 · · Score: 1

    I hope he quit and did something useful.

  80. To play devil's advocate... by Junta · · Score: 1

    So the companies don't want to spend 6 figures for these IT people. Suddenly, the 'cheap' H1-B option goes away. The dream is that they will start hiring local rather than importing. The reality will be they will suck it up and just fully offshore jobs they would otherwise have kept in the US.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  81. Re:What are they gonna do? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Most electrical engineers can't re-wire a house.

    Sheeit... you're kidding, right? Any EE that can't figure down basic wiring, look up Code, know how to keep the neutral line balanced, and get it done to ensure it's safe and compliant? Yeah, that person isn't worth a damn as an EE, seriously. When you compare it to the regs, boundaries, and environment adaptation required to rig-up industrial control systems? House wiring is a do-it-in-your-sleep piece of cake.

    I get what you were getting at, but really... that bit wasn't the best example.

    (Okay... *recent* EE grads who don't know shit outside of Verilog might have a hard time with it, but c'mon...)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  82. Re:What are they gonna do? by lgw · · Score: 1

    YOU'RE MAKING THE MACHINE SPIRIT ANGRY!

    AIEEEEEEE! There are daemons on the pipes! The token fell out of the token ring! We're doooooomed!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  83. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I hope he quit and did something useful.

    Based on my experience at working Fortune 500 companies, he probably got promoted to project manager and found the corporate credit card useful.

  84. The more reason to do it. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Since we're receiving flak from the offshoring bodies, it means that this would be an effective enough measure.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  85. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Uh, no. It's not IT's job to turn on your computer. The Fortune 500 companies I've worked for in the past have policies in place that prevent IT techs from running over to turn or reboot a user's workstation.

    It's the IT's job to do whatever the company requires. I've worked in design houses, where they literally expected IT to re-position the mouse/mousepad when they went too far.

    And have you worked at a "real" fortune 500? Everyone I've worked at (5000+ employees and computers at all) had a way for IT to reboot without "running over" so long as the base OS was reachable. So yeah, they'll have a policy about not running over to reboot, because if you are doing that, you are doing your job wrong. Why are you doing your job wrong?

    Or, as Robert Kiyosaki writes in "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," the more you specialize about something in college the less you know about everything else in real life.

    Writes -> Speculates. That someone wrote it in a book doesn't make it true. And the Renaissance man isn't dead yet. Instead, it's a complaint about people ignoring the basics. You can learn the basics to a level of competency and still specialize. Maybe not everyone, but enough that it's common.

    Although I've shocked a few doctors when I refused to transfer their iTunes library to a new workstation because having iTunes installed on their workstation was against hospital policies.

    They must have been shitty doctors. I've seen IT people fired for less. They are doctors, the rules don't apply. Though, I've never figured out, who's worse? Doctors or lawyers?

  86. Re:brain gap by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    [...] come in as a foreign student and get a college degree for free or severely reduced cost [...]

    You appear to be misinformed. International students typically pay three times more than a typical American student. They're actually subsidizing public colleges at $9B per year.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/foreign-students-pay-up-to-three-times-as-much-for-tuition-at-us-public-colleges-2016-9

  87. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Wire a house when it's a frame (and do so better than code, even if not strictly to code), yes.

    Re-wire a house, no. You have to cut open walls, pull wires, drill, and put it all back to where nobody knows you were there. "electrician" is more builder than wiring. The wiring is trivial. Getting it to look professional is harder.

  88. Is offshoring just about the money? by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 1

    What I'd like to know is if offshoring these IT jobs is *just* about the money. If it's a matter of getting *quality work* for cheap, compared to American counterparts, then tightening immigration laws will put the US further behind the IT curve. If it's just about the money, firms should be able to find comparable quality stateside, but I'd like to know if there's an indication, either way, that the quality of home-grown IT grads is comparable in quality.

    1. Re:Is offshoring just about the money? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Its pretty obvious that most american companies only want cheap and don't actually care about quality.

  89. Re:What are they gonna do? by mikael · · Score: 1

    They would put the electric sockets at the most convenient locations - like electric sockets behind the sink or on the mid-level half way up the staircase. Maybe not to code, but the most logical and practical location for hoovering a staircase or using an electric drill or saw.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  90. Re:This is a good thing by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Senator Orrin Hatch (A Republican)... I know nothing of his politics or whether he'd be for or against h1b reform though.

    He was the authoritarian asshat most supportive of Jack Thompson's crusade against video games, among other things.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  91. There IS no labor shotage in IT by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    What there actually is, is a shortage of US IT workers that will take the job even with the unreasonably low salary that most companies want to pay.

  92. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    Nice copy pasta. Too bad it does not apply.

    The problem they're facing is not racism. Nobody's calling Indians dirty or stupid. But we do need to limit immigration in some way, so why not let in the best and brightest? Those kinds of Indians will have no trouble getting an H1-B in the new system because they can command $200k salaries. It's the barely competent ones earning $40k that will be hurt. But you know what? That's fine. The US does not owe them a job or any social services.

    And in case you're wondering why we need to limit immigration: India has been a democracy for a long time now, but their people are still very poor. In a democracy, the only thing that decides how well the country is run is the people, directly or indirectly. If you move all 1.1 billion Indians to the US, you won't be giving them US living standards, you'll be turning the US into India, and giving everyone Indian living standards.

  93. Go bugger yourselves! by Seng · · Score: 1

    Go get a job in India, supporting Indians, and finally give those of us in IT some relief! If the day arrives where I don't have to repeat "pardon me?" 50 times, it won't be too soon.

  94. Re:brain gap by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    96% of adult Hindus in the US have college degrees.

    36% of adult Christians in the US have college degrees.

    Because the US only lets in the smart ones. In India, only 8% have college degrees. 36% are illiterate. Should we let them in too?

  95. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by Kjella · · Score: 1

    But if you want to pursue the American Dream of having it all ([snip] big wife and big kids), you need to earn big bucks for that.

    You have it wrong, you need to earn big macs. Plenty big macs.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  96. Re:brain gap by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Comparing the full population of Christians to a specially selected group of Hindus isn't that meaningful.

    Both groups are "selected" - adults who live in the United States.

    That doesn't answer the question: Why are American Christians so poorly educated?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  97. Re:The Stopped Clock by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    This is the only thing Trump has done (or will do) that I find appealing.

    Hey now, stopped clocks are right twice a day. He might do something else you find appealing, eventually... maybe.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  98. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    It's the IT's job to do whatever the company requires.

    As an enterprise IT tech, I've never turned on a computer for a user. Not in person, not remotely.

    And have you worked at a "real" fortune 500?

    I've worked at eBay, Fujitsu, Google, Intuit, and Sony to name a few over 20+ years. Now that I work in government IT, I'm responsible for 80,000+ workstations.

    Everyone I've worked at (5000+ employees and computers at all) had a way for IT to reboot without "running over" so long as the base OS was reachable.

    That would be against the policies of the Fortune 500 companies I've worked for.

    That someone wrote it in a book doesn't make it true.

    Pull a college catalog. A bachelor degree is very general with half the required classes dedicated to liberal arts and the other half to a specific major. A master degree focuses on a very specific major in more detail. A PhD program focuses on the obscure details that few people will ever know about. See how education goes from everything to very little? Robert Kiyosaki's point is that too much education can prevent someone from being a successful business person because the education system focuses on getting the right answers versus taking risks. Someone with a PhD will take less risk than someone with a bachelor degree or no higher education at all. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are two notable college dropouts who took great risk and changed the world.

    They must have been shitty doctors.

    Heart surgeons.

    I've seen IT people fired for less.

    I've seen IT people fired for not enforcing policy.

    They are doctors, the rules don't apply.

    You have obviously never worked in a hospital.

  99. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You have it wrong, you need to earn big macs. Plenty big macs.

    According to Apple, the biggest big Mac you can get has 16GB RAM. ;)

  100. Re:Does this bill mean.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    USA and Canada have very lax rules, perhaps the most lax of any two countries in the world (don't quote me on that, just guessing)

    Depends whether the Shengen Area of the EU counts as one country or many countries.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  101. No labor shortage by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

    There is *NO* labor shortage in IT. There is a perceived CHEAP labor shortage because corporations don't want to pay people what they are worth, while holding up countries like India as an example of what they think people should get paid.

    If you want to pay people what they get paid in India, move your fucking company to India.

  102. Re:There is no labor shortage by rastos1 · · Score: 1

    There is no labor shortage.

    Out of curiosity: do you admit that there can be money shortage?

  103. You're a couple years and one Speaker out of date by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Two years ago, Obama finally submitted a budget request on time, and Congress passed a budget (written largely by Ryan). Paul Ryan became Speaker in October 2015.

  104. GURU's pls halp URGENT by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If I have one doubt about that I will revert the same.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  105. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    Quote: "The US does not owe them a job or any social services."

    This is the fundamental problem. I agree with you. However, it seems that the US government has gotten into the jobs and social services business. If the government stopped handing out freebies like candy, we would not have this problem, and there would be no need for Trump's wall.

    Of course, not supplying social services would probably cause a huge outcry amongst entitled Americans like yourself.

    As for jobs, they do not "belong" to America, but to whichever private individual or company is doing the hiring, they are not owed to anyone at all. So the employer can hire whomever they damn well please. And if the employee cannot come to the job, then the job (and the taxes) will move to the employee. It is an iron law - you can complain all you want.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  106. Re:What are they gonna do? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Any good EE should be able to easily wire a house, even if they've never done such work. However, they might not do it to code unless you give them the actual code to read beforehand, or some condensed version of it.

    The code is, in general, a good idea to follow (though it probably doesn't get updated as fast as it should). It has evolved to prevent house fires and other problems. Just because a EE can figure out the basic theory behind house wiring pretty quickly given their educational background doesn't mean they'll figure out, on-the-fly, why certain practices are bad and can result in a fire later.

    But honestly, it's pretty easy these days just looking at the parts they sell at Home Depot.

  107. Get a citizen to do it. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If you want something done right get a citizen to do it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  108. Re:What are they gonna do? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's the [sic] IT's job to do whatever the company requires.

    You appear to be confusing "what the company requires" with "what some shitcock from marketing wants".

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  109. Re: What are they gonna do? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Yeah, no shit; three fucking wires to tell apart...

  110. Re: This is a good thing by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    They really don't have much to work with here; perhaps we could cut 'em a little slack and let 'em conflate the issues... just a bit?? :)

  111. Re:What are they gonna do? by fisted · · Score: 1

    electric sockets behind the sink

    Amazing idea.

  112. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Nope. I meant what I said. Some companies choose to hire only people who can work a computer, then expect IT to not reboot. Other companies knowingly hire people without the expectation they can use a computer, then hire others around them to hand-hold them in using them. Sometimes this is in assistants. I worked for one "tech company" that the CIO didn't have and had never used a computer. Every email he received was printed and delivered on his desk on paper. His email replies were dictated (then typed up and emailed). An office supply chain expected IT to sit with finance and help finance "program" Excel equations.

    This wasn't one idiot in marketing, but the expectation of the CEO/board of these companies, and was in written policies.

    That you've lead a sheltered life doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

  113. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Why would they have policies against supporting users remotely?

    If a user is working from home and can't access their workstation because its turned off, they should be calling their manager or driving into work to turn it on. They shouldn't be calling the help desk to avoid talking to their manager and/or driving into work.

    Were you too stupid to know of those tools?

    As a help desk tech, I don't think we had access to those tools.

    SMS/SCCM is used by "Fortune 500" companies, and allows remote rebooting of PCs. Why are are you not managing user PCs in an effective manner?

    Until I got into government IT, I wasn't aware of SCCM. Now that I'm responsible for 80,000+ workstations, I can reboot the entire network. One of the senior IT guys runs a script that automatically reboots 25% of the workstations each week.

    The story seems absurd. That you are making up incompetence on your part to make an arguing point to make another slashdotter look stupid. You are only succeeding in making yourself look stupid.

    The stupidity of your comment makes no sense whatsoever.

  114. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Because it'd almost be as if you had a little power? Don't get too excited from behind your helpdesk.

    Power is replacing your computer with a box of crayons. I haven't done help desk for nearly a decade now.

  115. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Some people work to have a regular (not pop star) life.

    As an IT support contractor, I haven't worked overtime in over ten years. My employment contracts prohibits me from working more than 40 hours a week. Fortune 500 companies and even the government are unwilling to pay overtime.

    If you want to bust your ass off to live bad. You can surely ask for a pay reduction.

    Or become a software developer.

  116. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the few hundred dollars not spent on a good mattress sure got them there faster.

    A mattress takes up space. A sleeping bag can be tossed into the closet.

  117. Re:What are they gonna do? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I had a solid handle on _all_ the building trades before I started Engineering school.

    Professional electricians don't fix drywall, they will cut the walls open, but leave the fixup after to 'professional' painters.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  118. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    If the government stopped handing out freebies like candy, we would not have this problem, and there would be no need for Trump's wall.

    Of course, not supplying social services would probably cause a huge outcry amongst entitled Americans like yourself.

    You are just too funny. Do you have any idea just how socialist Indians are? Hint: they have always been friends with the USSR, better than even the Chinese.

  119. Be careful what you wish for by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    I have worked in the software industry for over 25 years. Only recently we have started hiring people offshore. We work with people who are essentially contractors. It is very easy to let people go who are not productive. Over the course of a year we have gone through a lot of people, but now have a core team, that is very very good. And very very cheap, compared to a local team. The H1-B visa restrictions will just push people into that model sooner. The Internet is the great equalizer. To the detriment of many and the joy of others.

  120. Re:They should stay and improve their own countrie by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Half of us are here to squirt, the other half are here to ooze. (Mark Mothersbaugh).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  121. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    I know very well. But you generalize. There are Indians who are self-reliant, free-market supporters, who chafe under the socialist consensus. They are the ones who want to escape to an America that is better, not asking for handouts, and willing to pay their taxes due.

    But America wants to shut the door on them, tragically citing the same reasons which they deplore elsewhere.

    I apologize for mixing up two separate, but related, issues. The first is the Indians, which I have discussed above. The second is the Mexicans and other Latin Americans. The latter are perceived to be mooching off the American taxpayer (they are not, but if they are, why does the taxpayer permit it?) Both are "stealing" jobs, just in different industries and different levels of society.

    If you are born and raised American, with all the benefits and advantages that entails (freedom, education, security of life and property, natural resources, environmental quality) and you cannot compete with a third-world jumped-up peasant, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  122. Re:Both sides of the coin by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Just for ref (and to piss you off). My dad came to the USA in 1963 on contract to do research work on the Apollo heat shield. He got a green card in 30 days.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  123. Experience Shortage by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    There is an experience shortage; all co's want more experience, but importing workers only increases the experience shortage for citizens. A billion hours of school cannot replace experience.

  124. Re:OMG by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    And don't even get me started on those Goobacks from the future, coming back in time here to Take our jobs!

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  125. I take exception with most of what you wrote by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    a. Don't compare the middle east of 1000 years ago to the one of today. There's been 1000 years of scientific advancement.

    b. The Middle East was happily partaking in that advancement until we meddled. There are pictures of girls in Iran wearing modern, brightly colored dresses without burkas. We put one of your Theocrats in power to protect our interests and stop communism.

    c. Two words: Saudi Arabia. They'd have most favorite nation status if we didn't give it to China.

    We do awful, awful things in the middle east for the sake of cheap oil. I suppose it's better than what we do in Central/South America for cheap bananas...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  126. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    America wants to shut the door on them, tragically citing the same reasons which they deplore elsewhere.

    Some people do. Most the comments on this site suggests making reforms to prevent IT sweatshops from popping up. Very few are saying we should stop immigration completely.

    If you are born and raised American, with all the benefits and advantages that entails (freedom, education, security of life and property, natural resources, environmental quality) and you cannot compete with a third-world jumped-up peasant, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    I'm not, because I'm a first generation immigrant. The H1-B process is utterly disgusting. It both dehumanizes people like myself and disenfranchises American workers. It's only purpose as it exists today is to pad the coffers of rich business men. I don't speak out against it because I'm scared to compete with immigrants --- I already did and I'll happily do it again. I speak out because it's a shitty system that should be fixed.

  127. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Where I am, the electricians do the clean-up. Almost always doing the drywall, and only not doing it when they are one contractor in a set of contractors (such as in a major re-model).

  128. Re:OMG by thomn8r · · Score: 1
    So the company stops offshoring after wasting a couple of years of time and god knows how much money.

    But by this time, the executives who started the offshoring in the first place have cashed their bonus checks and moved on.

  129. Re:The Stopped Clock by thomn8r · · Score: 1

    In the group I worked with @ HP, they had to hire Americans just so they could lay them off. Seriously: in my group they hired a bunch of developers that had been out of school anywhere from 0 - 5 years, and then 6 months later, replaced them with H1's. You read it right: Meg had to hire people in order to make her layoff quota.

  130. Preaching to the choir by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

    I wish I had beaucoodles of +mod points to hand out.
    A lot of good stuff here. We all know the companies abuse hell out of the H1b program.
    In recent years the companies such as Disney don't even give enough of a shit to hide the fact they're flaunting current laws.
    I read with interest the stories shared here of abuse handed out to H1b visa holders - plenty of them tell their story over on the Programmers Guild forums.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  131. Re:What are they gonna do? by mikael · · Score: 1

    You've never visited "There, I've fixed it?" :)

    http://failblog.cheezburger.co...

    The mystery Google car:
    https://i.chzbgr.com/full/4575...

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  132. Re:What are they gonna do? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I was at the house of a college friend of mine. His mother said she was glad that he had laundry, because that's the only time she got to see him.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  133. Re:What are they gonna do? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    In every educational environment I've been in, we've been expected to know a few practical things related to our studies. Graduating with a CS degree and no knowledge of how to trouble-shoot the hardware would be reasonable. Not being able to use a computer wouldn't be.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  134. Re: What are they gonna do? by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    I like Pakistani girls. They are cute, and their manners and cultural upbringing are excellent

  135. Re:What are they gonna do? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    They come back after the inspection? Why wouldn't they hire painters? Lower hourly etc.

    I sometimes disparage painters...the proudest I've ever been as an amature 'medicine' cultivator was when a painter asked for something weaker than trainwreck, as he couldn't do his job on it. But the good painters can plaster flat as glass. Thousands of hours experience does make a difference.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'