Slashdot Mirror


Millennials Unearth an Amazing Hack to Get Free TV: the Antenna (wsj.com)

From a report on WSJ: Dan Sisco has discovered a technology that allows him to access half a dozen major TV channels, completely free. "I was just kind of surprised that this is technology that exists (alternative source)," says Mr. Sisco, 28 years old. "It's been awesome. It doesn't log out and it doesn't skip." Let's hear a round of applause for TV antennas, often called "rabbit ears," a technology invented roughly seven decades ago, long before there was even a cord to be cut, which had been consigned to the technology trash can along with cassette tapes and VCRs. The antenna is mounting a quiet comeback, propelled by a generation that never knew life before cable television, and who primarily watch Netflix , Hulu and HBO via the internet. Antenna sales in the U.S. are projected to rise 7 percent in 2017 to nearly 8 million units, according to the Consumer Technology Association, a trade group. Mr. Sisco, an M.B.A. student in Provo, Utah, made his discovery after inviting friends over to watch the Super Bowl in 2014. The online stream he found to watch the game didn't have regular commercials -- disappointing half of his guests who were only interested in the ads. "An antenna was not even on my radar," he says. He went online and discovered he could buy one for $20 and watch major networks like ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS free.

370 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. Free TV? Who knew? by Zecheus · · Score: 1

    The anecdotes in this article are quite funny.

  2. If you color the tip of the antenna with a by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 4, Funny

    green marker, it greatly improves the picture quality.

    1. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by James+Carnley · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the joke for those of us who didn't grow up with antennas?

    2. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can you explain the joke for those of us who didn't grow up with antennas?

      The joke is about CDs (compact discs) and coloring the edge of the CD to improve sound quality.

      http://www.snopes.com/music/me...

    3. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It is a reference to when CDs first came out and people were still making the switch from analog taped to digital. Many "audiophiles" who didn't understand the new technology were taken advantage of when they were convinced they could purchase special high priced markers and Mark the edge of the CD to "reduce the noise from bouncing ambient light" and improve the sound quality. It was later claimed the same effect could be achieved with a regular Sharpie (which was true since the effect was LITERALLY nil) and all of us who understood the technology laughed and cried, sometimes simultaneously.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      This hack only works for Bruce Banner.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of those audiophiles would have claim they can even hear the difference.

    6. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      All of the ones about whom I was writing, which is why I used quotes around the word :^) It is probably fair to say that it was more than half. The power of suggestion is quite effective in such subjective matters.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    7. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the explanation for those of use who didn't grow up with CDs? (Just kidding, I grew up with an antenna TV that had a sonic clicker for a remote and physical solenoids that you could hear clunking when the channel changed. Actually I had a TV before remotes existed, but the sonic remote holds a dear place in my heart.)

    8. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      All of them. That sort of thing is what keeps Monster Cables in business.

    9. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the old Zenith Space Command remotes were pretty cool.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenith_Electronics#Remote_controls

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    10. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the explanation for those of use who didn't grow up with CDs? (Just kidding, I grew up with an antenna TV that had a sonic clicker for a remote and physical solenoids that you could hear clunking when the channel changed. Actually I had a TV before remotes existed, but the sonic remote holds a dear place in my heart.)

      Oh, yeah!

      We had both of those things. A rooftop antenna with the "clicker box", AND a Zenith TV with the Ultrasonic, tuning-fork remote.

      Good times, good times...

    11. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by mikael · · Score: 1

      A long time ago on USENET, people claimed that they could improve the signal/noise ratio of their CD's by painting the rims green with a magic marker. A pen called Balonium was the one that the "experts" recommended.

      http://www.tomsguide.com/forum...

      https://www.audio-forums.com/t...

      "Do a web search for "Barry Ornitz" and "CD Optical Impedance
      Matching Fluid" to find the origin of this substance.

      Note especially that it was published on April 1st. "

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    12. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of those audiophiles would have claim they can even hear the difference.

      You mean "Audiophools" right?

      The best way with them is to say the more money you spend (not the more broke you are - there's a difference), the better anything sounds. That's all that matters - money spent.

      If you can't spend a dollar now on something, then you really should've and you're missing out. And you'll be missing out until you spend that dollar on the gizmo. After which we have gizmo B which you also need, but you're missing out because you don't have the money.

    13. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Megane · · Score: 1

      Ironically, one of the dumber DRM schemes for audio CDs could be defeated by using a magic marker to color over the DRM data.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    14. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Megol · · Score: 1

      Well I consider myself an audiophile however I'd never buy monster cables (unless they have some real advantage - like how they look, how flexible they are etc.), tiny stickers to place near interconnect cables, special stones to place on the expensive equipment etc. Much pseudo-science and magical thinking in some circles.

      What I do is buy reasonable priced headphones with good sound reproduction (currently using Philips Fidelity X1 somewhat modified) and a good source e.g. my current system is a MSI GS60 which uses a dedicated headphone DAC/amplifier design avoiding the analog processing of the normal audio codec. I actually replaced the standard headphone cable (something I've always considered suspect as designing a cable isn't hard) as they simply weren't good in a previous system, could hear a difference in blind A/B testing and measuring the response/resistance/capacitance showed that they should indeed produce audible distortions. The replacement? A cheap ass cable selected more for flexibility than anything else but didn't have the same reproduction problems. Doubt that I'd need it now with the current setup (the DAC/Amp are capable of driving difficult cables without problem) but still...

    15. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      And you didn't even need to be in line-of-sight!

    16. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Meski · · Score: 1

      Thought it was the (Panasonic??) green line tuning system. (where you fine tuned it for narrowest green stripe on the screen)

    17. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of those audiophiles would have claim they can even hear the difference.

      If they didn't have a stock 20-minute long diatribe about how they conducted their own triple-blind placebo-controlled trial to prove they can tell the difference on Edison cylinders of Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries", then they have to hand in their "audiophie" card.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    18. Re: If you color the tip of the antenna with a by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there were any business' selling $100 "cd pens"

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    19. Re:If you color the tip of the antenna with a by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So THAT's what these things are for! Friend of mine still has two, I always wondered why he kept those noisemakers around.

      Isn't even a sonic one more agreeable for your ears? In volume AND pitch?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Paywalled by nicholasjay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Article is Paywalled. Alternate Source?

    I grew up using an antenna for all of my TV needs. Now I have a TiVo Roamio OTA with a lifetime subscription (which I got a for a couple hundred dollars) for all of my DVR and app (Netflix, Hulu, etc) needs.

    1. Re:Paywalled by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I grew up using an antenna for all of my TV needs. Now I have a TiVo Roamio OTA with a lifetime subscription (which I got a for a couple hundred dollars) for all of my DVR and app (Netflix, Hulu, etc) needs.

      Same here, although I found the Tivo interface with Amazon Prime, Netflix somewhat clunky and sloooooww.

      I only use the Tivo OTA Roamio to DVR my over the air stations, and I also have Tivo Minis that connect to it for each room with a TV.

      I use an Amazon FireTV for my streaming....much better for Netflix and Amazon Prime (it works with 4K offerings too). I also have Playstation VUE on it for my old 'cable' news stations, etc.

      But I found the Tivo set up with 4 tuners was less $$ than a DIY set up, and was plug and play for the most part.

      Going this route, I dropped my TV payments from about $113-$118/mo on ATT Uverse to $35/mo I pay for the Playstation VUE, although I do see a $10/mo rate increase coming there.

      I don't count my internet into the equation as that I have a business connection, and would have internet regardless of TV needs. That is $69/mo with Cox Business Cable.

      I recommend folks looking to cut the cord and stream, to look into getting a business connection. It has NO data caps, no ports blocked, often with at least a low level SLA....and it doesn't really cost any more than what they're gouging residential people for for ISP service.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Paywalled by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

    3. Re:Paywalled by nicholasjay · · Score: 1

      Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

      "There's no batteries to run out!", they exclaimed.

    4. Re:Paywalled by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      In a few more years they're likely to "discover" a hack on their smartphone that allows them to actually talk to people rather than text them. As a bonus they'll realize that they don't have to pay anything extra for it either.

    5. Re:Paywalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, found news stand, bought newspaper, I've been tapping and swiping it for half an hour now and it still shows the same page. Halp!

    6. Re:Paywalled by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      I recommend folks looking to cut the cord and stream, to look into getting a business connection.

      Assuming one has an ISP willing to provide business service to residential areas.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    7. Re: Paywalled by bestweasel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried one of those. Fairly low resolution but huge screen size for a portable; manual zoom and the other controls are basic but work well, though not when it's windy for some reason. Easy to read in bright sunlight but sadly there's no backlight. Water resistance is poor though I saw someone using one as a makeshift hat in a downpour! Annotations can be made with an ink or graphite stylus. Cut and Paste works but is messy and Copy is quite slow. I've had mine for several weeks and as far as I can tell, it never needs recharging. I can't get the updates to work though.

    8. Re:Paywalled by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      My only ISP option is Comcast. If I can survive with 25 Mbps connection speeds or less, the overhead of a business account vs. residential is tiny. But above that level, the price difference grows rapidly. It's common for me to have two people in the house playing Minecraft while three others stream video, so I don't think 25 Mbps will work.

      We have a Tivo Bolt, and the performance of Amazon Prime and Netflix is fine on that. I don't know if I'm more tolerant of slowness than you, or if the Bolt has better performance.

    9. Re:Paywalled by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Assuming one has an ISP willing to provide business service to residential areas.

      Of course they do...have you not heard of "home businesses"...?

      ;)

      There's lots of them out there and they need service....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Paywalled by clovis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

      "There's no batteries to run out!", they exclaimed.

      Oh, no no no, not printed newspapers.

      Those things can catch fire.
      Just try it. Spread one out on the floor or sofa and just light one corner of the thing. See what happens. You'll want to be able to put it out, so be sure to have a full bladder before you begin.

      When I was a kid, all we had to play with was fire. And we were glad to have it.

    11. Re: Paywalled by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      You joke, but I have long-pressed words in physical magazines in the expectation of getting a pop-up definition.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    12. Re:Paywalled by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      No but my tablet works in the dark by itself i'd have to have a flashlight and a newspaper to read in a dark room.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    13. Re:Paywalled by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah i've been using libraries for years and still don't understand how they work.

      The local one even lets you borrow ebooks now :)

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    14. Re:Paywalled by Megane · · Score: 1

      My amazing hack was to feed the antenna (which has been in the attic of this two-story house since at least 1979!) into the input of the distribution amp that the cable company put in a box on the side of the house. Instantly the whole house gets free TV.

      The next hack (after summer ends) would be to put another antenna up there, and wire them together to try to get a distant (but in-market!) channel in a different direction.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    15. Re:Paywalled by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > put another antenna up there, and wire them together to try to get a distant
      > (but in-market!) channel in a different direction

      Doesn't work. Or more precisely, it's a LOT more complicated than just feeding two antennas into a diplexer to combine them into a single cable.

      Using a diplexer to combine VHF & UHF from an antenna with DVB-S from a satellite dish works, because the frequency band of the signals coming from the antenna doesn't overlap with the frequency band of the signals coming from the dish.

      Using a diplexer to combine an antenna tuned to VHF with an antenna tuned to UHF works, because the two frequency bands are still separate, both antennas are pointed in exactly the same direction, and the manufacturer can precisely balance the impedance between the two.

      Using a diplexer to combine two VHF+UHF antennas pointing in different directions usually makes matters worse. Assuming you're able to properly match the impedance between both antenna circuits (not guaranteed), there's still the matter of multipath interference.

      Suppose you have two antennas... one aimed northeast, and one aimed west. To the northwest and north, there's a cluster of skyscrapers or a mountain. You want to watch channel 35, whose transmitter is 15 miles northeast of you.

      If you connect only the antenna that's aimed northeast, and it's a directional antenna, you'll probably get a good, strong signal. Some of channel 35's signal will reflect off of the skyscrapers or mountain at an angle, but your northeastward-pointing antenna won't even see most of those weak reflections.

      HOWEVER... your antenna that's aimed westward IS going to scoop up some of those reflections. Because radio waves propagate at the speed of light, the reflected signals will arrive a fraction of a second later than the ones traveling in a straight line. If you combine the signals from both antennas, you'll NOW end up with a signal that has strong multipath interference. With analog TV, multipath interference causes ghosting. With digital TV, it either makes no difference at all, or leaves you with an unwatchable signal that stutters and breaks up.

      Moral of the story: if you have two antennas, give each antenna its own dedicated cable all the way to the tuner. Combining the signals from two antennas into one cable using a diplexer rarely works well.

    16. Re:Paywalled by clovis · · Score: 1

      > When I was a kid, all we had to play with was fire. And we were glad to have it.

      You had fire? You lucky, lucky bastard. When we were kids, fire was not yet invented.

      Yes, there was. But back then we called it "jailbait".

  4. This is not news, news for nerds, or interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the fuck.

  5. Using a TV antenna to watch TV by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they said that MBA's were useless. Sure showed them.

    1. Re:Using a TV antenna to watch TV by dysmal · · Score: 2

      I wish i had mod points for this!

    2. Re:Using a TV antenna to watch TV by msmash · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used one of mine :)

    3. Re:Using a TV antenna to watch TV by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      Whoooosh!!

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  6. Is this sarcasm? by clonehappy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

    an M.B.A student

    Oh, nevermind.

    1. Re:Is this sarcasm? by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast [expletive] TV?

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time. It's not like kids are born knowing how to wash clothes on a washboard either. Some of them don't even know how to wash clothes with modern technology by the time they go to college. I've known brilliant people who didn't know how to use a mop because nobody had ever taught them.

      --
      Real lawyers write in C++
    2. Re:Is this sarcasm? by clonehappy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I get it, but this guy isn't that much younger than me. Maybe if it was a 15 year old kid or something...I know what a telegraph is even though I've never even seen a telegram let alone used the equipment!

    3. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its like radio with moving pictures!

    4. Re:Is this sarcasm? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time.

      In this day and age, with information literally at one's fingertips, there is no excuse for not being informed on a multitude of subjects. If you don't know something, you look it up.

      There are many things I didn't know how to do, but guess what, I learned on my own, either by asking someone who was doing the thing I wanted to know, or read a book (pre internet) or now, DuckDuckGo it.

      Perhaps if people such as the one in the article would get out more and experience the world they wouldn't look like such dumb shits to the rest of us.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

      Sadly, this is a real phenomenon, and it isn't limited to Millennials.

      My folks had a couple in their mid-40s over for dinner a few years back (2014ish, I think). At some point during the conversation it came up that my parents used an antenna to watch TV, rather than subscribing to cable. The wife insisted that TV channels aren't available for free, so no matter what my parents called it, what they were really doing was stealing TV from the cable companies. It took my parents and her husband a good 20 minutes to convince her that it was not, in fact, a form of theft and that OTA TV is, in fact, freely available to anyone willing to put up an antenna.

      Mind you, this woman was old enough that she wouldn't have grown up with cable TV in her home, since it wasn't widely available during her childhood. The fact that she didn't remember that or know that it was still a thing was astounding.

      So yes, these sorts of people really exist, and it's not just MBAs.

    6. Re:Is this sarcasm? by JeffOwl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't "before" anybody's time. Broadcast TV has been available continuously for the guy's entire life.

    7. Re:Is this sarcasm? by LatePaul · · Score: 2

      It's quite easy to not know about a technology from before your time.
      In this day and age, with information literally at one's fingertips, there is no excuse for not being informed on a multitude of subjects. If you don't know something, you look it up..

      In order to look something up you have to know it exists.

    8. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gilgaron · · Score: 5, Funny

      So... how long did you wait to start mailing her invoices for the radio subscription in her car?

    9. Re:Is this sarcasm? by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      In order to look something up you have to know it exists.

      You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

    10. Re:Is this sarcasm? by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      Even more to the point..

      Broadcast TV is just now competitive in terms of amount of content being available OTA. Back in the 70's, we had access to only 3 channels (1 for each network) and no DVR capability where I grew up. So, when cable came along, it has several orders of magnitude more content available. Throw in a VCR on top of that and OTA made little sense. It was not competitive.

      Now.. since OTA has gone digital, they have introduced digital subcarrier channels. Where analog could only have 1 channel, it is not uncommon for there to be 4-5 channels available on the same frequency.

      Use Amazon, Netflix, and Hulu for the premium content, then use OTA for the dozens of channels. (I now live in northern Colorado and I have 56 channels available OTA. I am located in a fairly rural area).

    11. Re:Is this sarcasm? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Seconded (sorry, I posted above or I would have used mod points).

    12. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Before your time? I'm the same age as this guy and I remember adjusting my rabbit ears to get better reception. I think he's just an idiot.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    13. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      I know these are all arbitrary distinctions anyway, but technically Generation Y === Millenial. Being born in the early 2000s is the end of the Millenial generation.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    14. Re:Is this sarcasm? by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Americans are stupid. Keep this in mind if you are marketing to them. Call a clothesline a solar powered or wind powered dryer, and charge more.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    15. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Solandri · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I was moving to my new house, my millennial cousin came with me to the moving van rental store. It was a hot day, so on the drive home he complained that the van didn't have air conditioning. I told him to open the window. He fiddled around with his door for a minute, then declared "The windows in this van don't open." I had to explain how to roll down the window with the hand crank. He'd never been in a car without power windows.

    16. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd say that's more an example of how effective the MPAA/RIAA have been at brainwashing people into thinking that they should have to pay for every movie/TV show they watch and every song they hear. Because if you don't, it's piracy!

    17. Re:Is this sarcasm? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Now.. since OTA has gone digital, they have introduced digital subcarrier channels. Where analog could only have 1 channel, it is not uncommon for there to be 4-5 channels available on the same frequency.

      Where you live, perhaps. Where I live, you could get 6 channels with the old analog system, and you're lucky to be able to get two since the digital switchover.

    18. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Exactly! So one for FM and one for AM... if that works then may as well send one for AUX.

    19. Re:Is this sarcasm? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      The joke goes like this: an engineer is first day on a job. A foreman comes to him, hands him a broomstick and says "Sweep the floor. From here to over there.". "But, ... but ... I'm an engineer!", "Sigh, okay, give it here, I'll show you".

    20. Re:Is this sarcasm? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yeah - my brothers' 8 year old daughter was digging through some old stuff and found a VHS of Disney's Beauty and the Beast. She's recently seen the live action movie and excitedly asked "Do we have anything that can play these big fat DVD's?".

      To be honest I'm surprised she even knew what a DVD was.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    21. Re:Is this sarcasm? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      In order to look something up you have to know it exists.

      You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

      Little known fact about wikipedia - go to any random page and click the first link, and then the first link in the page that loads, and repeat the process. After around 15 clicks you end up at philosophy :-)

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    22. Re:Is this sarcasm? by mikael · · Score: 1

      It's kind of funny. My dad used to have a large boombox style AIWA radio which took all types of metal oxide tape cassettes. There were different types of metal oxide tape, which by adjusting a particular level would provide optimum sound quality. When these appear on collectors pages, they don't know what all the different levers are for.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    23. Re:Is this sarcasm? by mikael · · Score: 1

      I sometimes I could make a map of Wikipedia and Wolfram Mathworld and find the shortest path between two concepts using Google Maps.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    24. Re:Is this sarcasm? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      No. If you are at all educated - an MBA, for whatever it's worth, is a damn master's degree - there is no excuse for thinking TV didn't exist until streaming services started online. We're not talking about a 10 year old, we're talking about someone in their mid 20s or so. And not knowing how to use something is not the same as not knowing something exists. AND does this mean the person never watched any movies or tv shows what that showed people from pre-2009 watching TV via antenna? AND - biggest and here - does this mean he's never had a car and listened to the radio? This is fake news to generate page views for ad revenue.

    25. Re:Is this sarcasm? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes but within 10 clicks you always end up at the same place: An article about Hitler.

    26. Re:Is this sarcasm? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I remember when my daughter was little and came across a rotary telephone in a box in the garage. Her comment: "so that's why we say 'dial the phone'!"

      It hadn't occurred to me how weird that phrase must sound if you've only ever seen touch-tone phones.

    27. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    28. Re:Is this sarcasm? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I agree with this.
      We should start calling antennas piracy too.

      Then there is the BS of refusing service to people who have actually paid for your product.
      Such as the current blocking of netflix VPN users and HDCP copy protection, copy protection in general.

      Then there is the poor treatment of paying customers
      The unskippable anti piracy warnings and ads on blurays and dvds that you don't see on a pirated copy, DRM that makes your game run slow but the cracked versions run better (Rime). (Rime was released DRM free shortly after as a result tho.)

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    29. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm in my forties and cable has been available for as long as I can remember.

      I never said it was unavailable. I said it wasn't widely available and I was correct in saying so.

      It wasn't until the mid-1970s that cable finally passed the milestone of being available in half of the markets being served by OTA TV. By the end of that decade (when this woman would've been about 10), cable was just shy of being into 16 million homes (20%). Cable didn't get its big break until the Cable Act of 1984, which is about the time that I'd guess this woman would have been entering high school. By the end of the 1980s cable was in 53 million households (58%), so while it's entirely probable that her family had cable by the time she graduated high school, it's unlikely that she grew up with it.

      I'll grant that I should have phrased it as "this woman was old enough that she likely wouldn't have grown up with cable TV in her home", but otherwise, I stand by what I said. Even if we ignore the fact that she grew up in a small town (rural markets were generally the last to be served), the odds of her having cable on her tenth birthday would still only be around 20%.

    30. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The "wikipedia excursion" is an example of what is, for me, the great value of the internet: it's a huge array of linked sources. Following a series of interesting-article links is how:
      - I learned of linux, and how to install it, what apps to run, and more
      - l figured out how to melt aluminum in a charcoal-fired furnace and cast parts in sand molds
      - I learned to install wired Ethernet around my house
      - I figured out how to change my clutch, timing chains, and head gasket on my car

      Finding something you didn't set out to look for is an amazing benefit of the net.

    31. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Subm · · Score: 1

      > You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

      Wikipedia? I think you meant porn.

    32. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Mind you, this woman was old enough that she wouldn't have grown up with cable TV in her home, since it wasn't widely available during her childhood.

      I'm not sure why you'd think that. Cable was widely available during the 70's, with millions of subscribers.

      Not to say that sort of ignorance isn't rather amazing, but it's very likely that she grew up in a cable-TV household.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    33. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Megane · · Score: 1

      And they're all unencrypted, so not only can you DVR them (if you can find a DVR that doesn't assume that everyone uses cable), but you can put DVR software on a PC and have them dumped into plain old MPEG-2 transport stream files that you can keep or trade with other people.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    34. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I already responded to someone else regarding this topic, but the short version is that cable was only available in half the markets in the US by the mid-70s, and it was only in 20% of households (16M) by the end of the '70s.

    35. Re:Is this sarcasm? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I barely remember my Dad's car having a CHOKE when I was a kid. I thought it would be something I'd have to learn about when I started driving. By the time I was driving, nothing had a choke. I'd have to google what you do with it. I vaguely recall that it has something to do with adjusting the carburetor to make the car start and/or run better when it first warms up--but I wouldn't know when/when not to use it without researching. I wager that even on Slashdot there are some people reading about the choke for the very first time, right here, simply because they're too young to have seen them and are not that interested in old cars.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    36. Re:Is this sarcasm? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never gotten lost on a wikipedia excursion. After a few hours not only do you find things you had no clue existed, you find things you would have never wanted to know about.

      Oh shit, dude, if I'd only had 5 moderator points, I'd have thrown them down the Wikipedia Rabbit Hole you brought up. :)

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    37. Re:Is this sarcasm? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      It shows however that providing TV service for a monthly fee gets so much more attention from some prospective buyers that they did not know they could get a good enough result from a free OTA service.

      Next time someone says "let's release some frequencies that only a minority uses anyway" perhaps there will be some extra resistance from those who found out don't need to pay for TV every month.

    38. Re:Is this sarcasm? by mmdurrant · · Score: 1

      I tried this a few times and got there within 15 every time. Then I found this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... It's a loop. A trap, even.

      --
      I see my shadow changing, stretching up and over me...
    39. Re:Is this sarcasm? by sudon't · · Score: 1

      This isn't "before" anybody's time. Broadcast TV has been available continuously for the guy's entire life.

      Yeah, but who uses it? I wasn’t even sure broadcasting went on anymore, although I’ve never really been a TV watcher, (I don’t have cable, either).

      But kids, here are some tips from the 1960s: Wrap tinfoil around the antennas to increase reception. You can also get some extra antenna cable and hang them out the window. Rabbit ears want a lot of manipulation! For best reception, you want an external antenna on the roof. If the channel knob comes off, or gets lost or broken, keep a small pair of pliers on top of the set. If you want something more permanent, attach a small pair of vice-grips. If the picture goes all fuzzy, smack the side of the set. Begin by smacking it softly, working your way up until it works. When smacking the set stops working altogether, you’ll want to open up the back and reset all the tubes, (pull ‘em out, and plug ‘em back in). Don’t forget to unplug the set first. Hope this helps!

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    40. Re:Is this sarcasm? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      My uncle is pretty sharp. He had a non-working toilet because he didn't know how to make the chain from the lever to the flap valve shorter. It was "broken" for months. A 1 minute fix.

    41. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Let's look up TV options. Type in "TV Service" and Google suggest etc will usually reference something like "without cable" within the first 4 suggested search terms. Hopefully most people would read that far....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    42. Re:Is this sarcasm? by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      I saw this and thought "Really?" From the front page of wikipedia chose https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... 11 clicks brought me to Philosophy. I'm impressed.

    43. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1
      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    44. Re:Is this sarcasm? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      And do you know why it used to be "ring the phone"?

      because in the days before dials, you cranked a generator that created voltage that would "rang" the operator (ring a bell or light a light to indicate your line was live) so they could connect you to whomever you wanted to call.

      Not that I was alive anywhere near that time period, but I know about them, and telegraphs, and other early modes of communication. It's something you should simply learn through your education system, if for no other reason than to know the progression of technology.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    45. Re:Is this sarcasm? by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      You just need a better antenna. With Digital either you get the signal 100% or you get nothing.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
  7. April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this whole "article" has to be some sort of joke.

    1. Re:April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 2
      I couldn't help but triple take when I saw that it was a Wall Street Journal link. From reading the summary I was certain it had to be from the Onion. I mean...this piece of gold:

      ...Mr. Sisco, an M.B.A. student in Provo, Utah, made his discovery after inviting friends over to watch the Super Bowl in 2014. The online stream he found to watch the game didn't have regular commercials -- disappointing half of his guests who were only interested in the ads.

      That's 4 jokes in one right there. I'm actually disappointed that this WASN'T an Onion story.

    2. Re:April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      LOL. Entertaining Superbowl ads are a thing of the past, judging by the last few years.

    3. Re:April Fools Was 4 Months Ago by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this whole "article" has to be some sort of joke.

      I can't find anything about it on http://www.snopes.com/ should be mentioned even if false.

  8. Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get a HDHomeRun and you can watch broadcast TV from pretty much any modern device. Each one has two tuners, and they can be split across devices. Want to record? Connect a cheap NAS. Want more than two channels at once? Just get another one -- they work in tandem.

    Been using these for about a decade now and couldn't be happier. The quality is even better than basic cable because you don't need to deal with their re-encoding antics.

    1. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Get a HDHomeRun [silicondust.com] and you can watch broadcast TV from pretty much any modern device. Each one has two tuners, and they can be split across devices. Want to record? Connect a cheap NAS. Want more than two channels at once? Just get another one -- they work in tandem.

      I actually look into this, and found that the cost to buy a computer and put something like MythTV on it or whatever, to get DVR capability along with the HDHomerun (I used to use these awhile back)....was GREATER and more of a hassle than to just buy a Tivo OTA DVR/tuner unit...

      The Tivo comes with 4 tuners, 1TB DVR storage and lifetime "service"...for about $399.

      I set up one of these with Tivo mini units throughout the house for every TV I have...for my over the air needs. I used Amazon FireTV for streaming Playstation VUE, Netflx, etc....

      But do look into the Tivo OTA unit....it was plug and play, 4 tuners and less $$ than the DIY route with HDHomeRun.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by TypoNAM · · Score: 2

      I've been using a HDHomeRun dual-tuner since 2007 with mythtv on my home linux server, a schedules direct subscription (since 2010) for guide information, and basically just using VLC and MPC-HC for playback via "Direct Download" URLs from mythweb interface. The setup has worked out very well for me.

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    3. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by PhotoJim · · Score: 5, Informative

      The advantage of the HDHomeRun solution, at least with Plex (if not with its own software) is that you get unencrypted feeds recorded on your hard disk. You can do what you want with them - you can generate DVDs or Blu-Ray discs from them, stream them, put them on a flash drive and share them... it's not trapped inside your box.

    4. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The advantage of the HDHomeRun solution, at least with Plex (if not with its own software) is that you get unencrypted feeds recorded on your hard disk. You can do what you want with them - you can generate DVDs or Blu-Ray discs from them, stream them, put them on a flash drive and share them... it's not trapped inside your box.

      Very valid point!!

      I did like having that capability back when I was running HDHomerun with MythTV back in the day.

      I found, however, that I rarely if ever had any need or want to capture for keeping anything I got off of OTA TV.

      I'm gonna have to look more into PLEX. I'm not terribly familiar with it, other than my friend has a server set up that I hook into occasionally, but thought it was only for pre-recorded content.

      I was actually looking to maybe put my CD/Music collection that I have ripped into FLAC onto a PLEX server (they run on linux, right?) and use that to stream to my living room good stereo...from FireTV box over HDMI to the Marantz AV receiver, out....I'm thinking that would be a pretty darned good signal for my set up.

      Anyway..rambling....but I'll have to look into Plex more.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by darkain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I picked up one of these tuners about a year ago, but without the added option of recording. Nobody in my house cares enough about TV to record, so it wasn't an issue. Most of our content is either PBS or available on Amazon Prime or some other streaming service. We mainly wanted it for live broadcasts (such as local sports or news)

      With a rooftop mounded antenna, surprisingly, my house is currently picking up 56 stations. The absolute minimum cost for cable in my neighborhood right now is $20/mo, which is exactly the same channels as the broadcast list, except we get a few extra international and religious stations, and are missing some government stations.

      The HDHomeRun was around $80, plus another $20 or so for the antenna, and another $20ish for wiring. That is the same as about 6 months of wired service from the cheapest local option for nearly identical content. This was simply a no-brainer!

    6. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      NOVA, American Experience, Frontline, and any number of other PBS programs that come on after I've gone to bed. W

      OH, don't get me wrong, I do DVR/Record stuff off OTA, hence my Tivo, but answering the earlier post, I don't find that I need to keep these programs I record OTA. With those it is pretty much watching it once and delete.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The advantage of the HDHomeRun solution, at least with Plex (if not with its own software) is that you get unencrypted feeds recorded on your hard disk. You can do what you want with them - you can generate DVDs or Blu-Ray discs from them, stream them, put them on a flash drive and share them... it's not trapped inside your box.

      You can download anything you want from TiVo in standard mpeg format so long as it has not been marked copy protected. Nothing OTA is.

      You need your MAK you can get from TiVo menus and decoder software to decrypt the stream (http://tivodecode.sourceforge.net)

      There are a few front ends available with UI's to automate the process of downloading from now playing.

    8. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Yes, Plex runs on Linux (and other OSes - I run my instance in Linux). It's slick.

    9. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      I have HTPCs on every TV (3 in total). If you watch local sports the OTA broadcast are MUCH higher quality than the cable company's compressed crap.The HDHomerun is great it has 2 turners. So 2 TVs can watch or 1 TV and recording. My cheapest cable package is $48/mo. No question a deal for me.

    10. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      "The Tivo comes with 4 tuners, 1TB DVR storage and lifetime "service"...for about $399."

      I have two TiVo's (actually three if you count the old Series 1 in storage but that's no use without an external tuner now) and the big problem I have is that TiVo's service provider here in the antipodes is dropping it. So, I've got two boxes with lifetime service which will stop working in October. There are some people working on chipping the units to allow them to be hacked and then use a local source of guide data but I'm just about ready to give up on this. TiVo was good while it lasted but the amount of stuff on broadcast TV I actually want to watch these days is slow small I don't think I'm going to miss it. All the good shows moved onto subscription services years back.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    11. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      You have to buy a box? I use old parts to build Myth setups. You can get by with a 1 TB hard drive, and you don't need much processing power. The main reason to build a Myth box is for the automatic commercial skipping. Once it is built and setup it should run until the hard drive gives out.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    12. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > it's not trapped inside your box

      This is a HUGE, under-appreciated advantage. It's a lot harder to "cut the cord" (or switch providers) if doing so means losing the all of the recorded TV shows locked into your current DVR. With a cablecard-ready HDHomeRun, you can subscribe to Comcast for a year using a cablecard, record shows using Windows Media Center, then cancel Comcast at the end of the year and spend the next 2 years watching shows you recorded... then resubscribe to Comcast for another year once you're eligible for "new subscriber" pricing again.

      Up until around 2012, the only way to get a cablecard-compatible PC tuner was to buy a complete, certified HTPC from someone like Dell (at staggering cost that pretty much destroyed the economics of doing this). At some point, CableLabs quit requiring that the ENTIRE system be certified & approved, and allowed you to build your own computer running Windows 7, attach it to something like a HDHomeRun Prime, and use it to record copy-protected shows. The recordings themselves are still inextricably bound to the computer used to record them (at least, if they're flagged COPY_ONCE by the cable company), but the cablecard only governs whether or not WMC is allowed to RECORD them... once they're recorded, they're yours to enjoy forever, as long as the computer itself doesn't break.

      If you have an old computer (or moderately high-end laptop from sometime after 2008) that already has Windows 7, you can pick up a used HDHomeRun Prime on eBay for around $90 (more, if you're in a hurry... less, if you can deal with losing a few auctions until you get lucky). For another $10-25, you can buy an official Windows Media Center remote & USB IR receiver on Amazon. For another $125 or so, you can add a 3 or 4 terabyte USB hard drive, and have probably 4-20 times the recording space you EVER got to have with a DVR leased from the cable company.

      Once you have the hardware, subscribe to cable with one outlet, no box, no DVR service (the guide data comes from Microsoft for free), and a single cablecard. For other TVs, go on Craigslist and buy a used XBOX 360 for around $40-50, which you can then use over your home's LAN as a media center extender (to watch shows recorded on that DVR, or even watch live TV using one of the HTPC's tuners). As an added perk, if you have an older amp that can decode Dolby Digital over SPDIF, but doesn't have HDMI inputs, the XB360 is one of the only ways I know of to get DD5.1 surround sound via SPDIF from Netflix. Win-win.

    13. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Not sure what I'll do when MSFT stops providing automatically updated program listings for local TV stations

      You might have to edit the registry to get guide data from someone besides Microsoft, but it's not hard to do, and there's already at least one company that will independently provide guide data for around $25/year.

      In retrospect, it's pretty amazing how Windows Media Center has taken on a life of its own and remained viable literally YEARS after Microsoft officially abandoned it, thanks mostly to the fact that they made it so open-ended and user-extensible to begin with. IMHO, WMC is probably one of the best products Microsoft has ever made.

      Personally, I wish SlingTV would just pay SiliconDust to write them server code to emulate a HDHR Prime, coupled with a virtual WMC tuner that connects to SlingTV over the internet as if it were a HDHR Prime. Then, SlingTV customers could just use WMC as their DVR. I'd venture a guess that probably 99% of the client-side code could be recycled from the HDHR Prime's drivers, and writing the server-side code at SlingTV's end would be fairly straightforward (compared to the server-side code they've ALREADY had to write to make the service exist at all).

    14. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Hi

      Do you know if this sort of setup could work if I wanted to have a HDHomeRun tuner in one country and the streaming device elsewhere? I don't fancy setting up a satellite dish for watching TV only very occasionally...

      Thanks!

    15. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by almitydave · · Score: 1

      I was actually looking to maybe put my CD/Music collection that I have ripped into FLAC onto a PLEX server (they run on linux, right?) and use that to stream to my living room good stereo...from FireTV box over HDMI to the Marantz AV receiver, out....I'm thinking that would be a pretty darned good signal for my set up.

      I have Plex Media Server running on my Linux server doing exactly this. My Roku LT and XBox 360 can play the music directly with their built-in media players (no special app required), as can any Android device with VLC.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    16. Re:Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier - and cheaper - to install a splitter or two and run cheap 75 ohm coax around the house?

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    17. Re: Seriously? Look at SiliconDust by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I put an antenna in the attic (pesky HOA! pesky location!),

      Good news. Your HOA cannot legally prevent you from putting up an antenna. If they do they'll be in violation of federal law.

  9. Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

    Yes, if you want to sit through 18 minutes of advertisements (average) per 60 minutes of programming, sure, use broadcast television. If you work out the amount of television / streaming content the average person consumes versus the cost of fully-paid streaming, then your "savings" put the value of your time at far less than that of a fourth-world sweatshop worker. But whatever floats your boat.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      It's 2017. Who watches anything in real time?

      I skip the ads, and I usually speed up the playback to 1.5X, so a "60 minute" program usually takes well under 30 minutes to watch.

    2. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do know that those breaks are good times to go to the bathroom, wash the dishes, make the bed, start a load of laundry, etc.

      Also that a PVR works with it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by msauve · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. A cheap Roku TV (<$150) and a 16G USB stick, and you can pause OTA TV for up to 90 minutes. Start your show, pause it, go off and do other things for 30 minutes, then come back and FF through the commercials.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by slack_justyb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's nothing wrong with streaming per se. I love Netflix, big Stranger Things fan, but the argument that I'm "saving" something by skipping ads I feel is quite silly to me. It was time that I originally planned to be non-productive. I planned on that time to yield nothing. So getting back the 18 minutes that I would have spent in ads still yields me $0 since that's the value I placed on that time originally. I just don't get this notion that every second of someone's life has some dollar and cents attached to it. We're not 100% productive beings, in fact that's very much the core reason we've invented things to increase our productivity.

      If putting a price on every second someone is alive is your kind of thing, then more power to you. I'm not calling you wrong in any sense of the word because I just feel that this isn't one of those things that has a "correct" answer. It's just a matter of how one values their time. I'm sure there's pros and cons to either perspective, but I vote with my dollars based on how much I enjoy the content, not the lack or presence of ads.

    5. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Most people watch sports in real time, but that's about it. True sports fans hate watching a game that's been recorded, because it's too easy to find out who won.

    6. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by darkain · · Score: 1

      "Commercials" are called "Designated Piss Breaks" - learn to use your time more effectively!

    7. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      I 100% agree on time savings, but many of us don't use the antenna for watching the commercial-laden network TV shows (I pay for Hulu Plus for the no commercial versions for the 2 or 3 network shows I actually watch).

      The antenna is just great for picking up network stations for local news broadcasts, the local PBS stations for the kids and occasional documentary (Frontline, etc.), and the occasional surfing across the nostalgia channels (MeTV, Heroes, JusticeTV, etc.) And for that rare, can't miss broadcast not on a cable station (the annual Super Bowl, etc.), it works great.

    8. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you want to sit through 18 minutes of advertisements (average) per 60 minutes of programming, sure, use broadcast television.

      I hooked up one of our TVs to an antenna recently to get the local channels. Wish I hadn't have bothered. After a decade of living commercial free, I couldn't go back to watching TV that had commercials on them. It was so horrible. I can't believe that I used to watch shows like that.

      I'd rather just not watch TV than watch a show filled with commercials every few minutes.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Sports hold lots of people off from cutting the cord. You'll miss some games, but the best matchups for college football are broadcast. So, it is a relevant and cost effective way to get some forms of entertainment even with commercials.

    10. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      You do know that those breaks are good times to go to the bathroom, wash the dishes, make the bed, start a load of laundry, etc.

      The problem is, you can do all the above, and the commercial break hasn't ended yet!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent point -- but in skipping ads, you are saving something. Not time, necessarily, but certainly a measure of sanity.

    12. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      but certainly a measure of sanity.

      Trust me when I say, all things in my life considered ads need to up their game on their attack of my sanity if they wish to compete with the folks I work with. And on that note, I am all behind the idea that meetings with the group of non-technicals that develop the requirements for our software projects, are broken up with intrusive ads.

    13. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      I never watch live TV. I use Mythtv to automatically skip commercials. I was watching TV with my mother and I couldn't believe how bad commercials have gotten.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    14. Re:Free, assuming your time is worth nothing. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      One reason for TV channels that break up is the fact that lots of TV stations use insanely long MPEG2 GOPs as a way to decrease the bitrate of their main HD channel & free up more bits for their SD subchannels. Historically, 15-frame GOPs were the generally-accepted norm. Nowadays, stations commonly use GOPs with 60 frames or more.

      MPEG2 has 3 kinds of frames... I, B, and P. An I-frame is basically like a JPEG image... it contains all the data you need to display it. B and P frames are derived from adjacent frames, and individually require significantly fewer bits to encode than an I-frame.

      So... suppose you have a broadcaster whose main channel is 1080i60, with 2 or 3 480i60 subchannels. To make room for those subchannels, the broadcaster might use 60-frame GOPs. Since 1080i60 has 30 real frames per second, this means that if a burst of RF noise corrupts the first frame after an I-frame, the picture could conceivably be corrupted for two whole seconds before it gets another I-frame and is able to recover.

      I've never seen it done "in the wild" by an actual broadcaster, but in theory, there's a way to make this more tolerable. Basically, you make the GOP longer, but encode redundant bands of complete data into the B & P frames (spread around, so each frame in the GOP has different bands). That way, if a frame gets badly corrupted early in the GOP, the details will fill back in (kind of like the old Apple II "venetian blind" effect) starting with the next frame, instead of remaining corrupted until the next I-frame.

  10. what's old is new again by klashn · · Score: 1

    this is hilarious! what is old is new again. Now think back to something that's fallen out of favor and capitalize on it!

    1. Re:what's old is new again by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! Did you know you can get basically Pandora for free? And more than likely your car already has the equipment for it!! I usually plug the iPhone in before I start the car up, but one day I totally left it in the cup holder forgetting to plug it up. I thought that the silence would have been a cue for me to plug it in but boom! Music was playing when the car turned on. I looked at my phone, looked at the console of the car, back at the phone, back at the console. I just couldn't understand what this new "FM" device was! But it's basically free music. I got to work, turned off the car, waited a second, turned it back on, and boom the FM device was back!

      Anyway, I wonder if Apple will ever build an app that allows me to access my "FM" device account? Also, is the membership built into the price of a car? I just don't understand how a streaming service can exist without me paying for it.

    2. Re:what's old is new again by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Dude, you won't believe it but there's another music streaming device built into your car: push on the AM/FM button! Just make sure to open ports 540 to 1600 on your car router.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:what's old is new again by Paul+Carver · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds interesting. I do see an "FM" button in my car but the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons appear to be missing. Any suggestions on how I can permanently block specific songs from playing or make other songs play more frequently on this "FM" device? Oh, and where's the "search" box? Obviously with Pandora I just type in the name of a song or artist on the qwerty keyboard, but it's not clear where the corresponding UI is in my car.

      I tried pressing the "FM" buton but it seems to play quite a lot of crap that I don't want to hear. It definitely needs some serious thumbs down input.

    4. Re:what's old is new again by slew · · Score: 1

      Dude, you won't believe it but there's another music streaming device built into your car: push on the AM/FM button! Just make sure to open ports 540 to 1600 on your car router.

      That streaming device doesn't stream music, it just streams a bunch a windbags whining about the government or talking about some sporting even that may or may not even be live... Kind of like if someone was doing a dictation of a sub-reddit, but generally less entertaining...

    5. Re:what's old is new again by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the other 25% of it streams music.

    6. Re:what's old is new again by porges · · Score: 1

      I just couldn't understand what this new "FM" device was! But it's basically free music.

      The FM is for "Free Music". The AM feature is for "Angry Men".

  11. A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The only problem with OTA HDTV in Silicon Valley is that all the clear channels are in foreign languages. English channels are whitewashed in static.

    1. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The only problem with OTA HDTV in Silicon Valley is that all the clear channels are in foreign languages. English channels are whitewashed in static.

      Just turn on SAP n00b. Secondary Audio Programming. It's a setting on your TV menu. Guess what SAP on a Spanish or Japanese channel is ... wait for it ... it's English!!!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So use your genius-level brain and learn that foreign language.

      Why? I haven't watched TV in 20+ years. Heck, my 48" HDTV doesn't even have an OTA TV turner.

    3. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      then it isn't a tv, it is a monitor.

    4. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      OTA channels are all digital these days so they won't be whitewashed in static, they'll have digital artifacts/blockiness.

    5. Re:A bit early/late for April Fools' Day... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > So use your genius-level brain and learn that foreign language

      It would help a lot if foreign-language channels ALSO had subtitles (I personally can read Spanish pretty well, but suck at understanding spoken Spanish, unless the speaker is another American who learned Spanish as a second language). Until fairly recently, not even popular primetime shows on Univision and Telemundo had subtitles. Apparently, despite collectively having a greater market share in Miami than ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox, they were legally classified as "minority" stations & exempted from having to provide subtitles like English-language stations have been required to do since the 80s. And even now, it's obvious that most of their subtitles are done with speech-recognition software and have no human proofreading at all.

  12. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For real.

    "We interviewed some dumbshit kid and he said some dumbshit things! Millenails are turning society on it's head!"

  13. Commercials for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Correction, it allows one to watch commercials on networks like ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS for free. Awesome.

    1. Re:Commercials for free by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      So it's better than paying for an Internet connection and being forced to waste bandwidth for ads on YouTube?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  14. In the UK, we still use them... by rklrkl · · Score: 1

    In the UK, "digital terrestrial broadcasting" still requires the use of an antenna, which is usually mounted somewhere on the roof. Although it's called "Freeview", you still have to pay an annual TV license (and almost all non-BBC channels have adverts). You get a selection of HD channels and even more SD channels, but if it's even more free channels you're after, something like a sat dish is probably the way to go in the UK.

    1. Re:In the UK, we still use them... by limegreen · · Score: 1

      but if it's even more free channels you're after, something like a sat dish is probably the way to go in the UK.

      That's the way I went - a Sky dish repurposed with a FreeSat box. Picture quality on the main channels is great, even in SD.

  15. I use this too by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I've cut back all the extra cable channels I never watch, and it even gives me songs and anime in Spanish and Mandarin and Japanese.

    It's super cool. Who knew that your local PBS station broadcasts on three frequencies, or that all the soccer games are on Telemundo in higher quality (1080p) instead of the lower definition 1080i you get from Comcast? And then you turn on SAP on the Spanish soccer game and you hear English!!

    It totally rocks!

    Add Crunchyroll Premium to that and you're a winner!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I use this too by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Don't lose your head over the whole Crunchyroll thing. Do they have Puella Magi Madoka Magica?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:I use this too by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Don't know. Can barely keep up with what they have.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:I use this too by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Damn. I guess my joke went way over your head.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  16. In other news..... by RadioD00d · · Score: 1

    You can use a toothbrush to clean your teeth, and there's a thing called a comb which is very handy for arranging your hair.... This story belongs on the Onion. I'd mod it for sarcasm, but I'm commenting...

  17. Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

    Enjoy the ads, which take up half your viewing time and assume you are an idiot. I would not say I am "grateful" for our online marketing overlords, per se, but at least there's a slim chance that streaming ads are relevant.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Enjoy the ads, which take up half your viewing time and assume you are an idiot. I would not say I am "grateful" for our online marketing overlords, per se, but at least there's a slim chance that streaming ads are relevant.

      They make OTA DVRs, you know, so you can record your programming and watch it afterwards, skipping through the ads.

    2. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Personally, I dramatically prefer untargeted ads over targeted ones. Targeted ads just remind me that I'm being spied on.

    3. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

      Personally, I dramatically prefer untargeted ads over targeted ones. Targeted ads just remind me that I'm being spied on.

      Well, enjoy the Brawndo spots.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I'd never heard of Brawndo before your reply (so I guess it was targetd?), but sure, why not? I have never found an ad that was useful or interesting, targeted or not, so they're all the same in terms of enjoyability.

    5. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

      It's from the film Idiocracy.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    6. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course! I missed that reference, and yet I still managed dress myself this morning. Wonders never cease.

    7. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by chispito · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course! I missed that reference, and yet I still managed dress myself this morning. Wonders never cease.

      Easy, there. I wasn't trying to get you all riled up, I was just trying to explain myself. Not everyone is out to pick a fight--even online.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    8. Re:Next up they will discover untargeted ads by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      No worries, I didn't think you were picking a fight, and didn't take offense. I was just trying to express my genuine dismay at missing a reference that I totally shouldn't have missed.

  18. More than half a dozen by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I count 36 OTA channels in my current lineup. That's about as many as I got on my first cable service in the 1980s. Admittedly, most of the channels are crap, but so are most of the channels on cable.

    My favorite way to set it up is to get one of those huge outdoor antennas and just throw it on top of the fiberglass in the attic, generally pointed at the transmitters. I've always gotten flawless reception that way (much better than rabbit ears), without having an ugly lightning magnet on the outside of the house.

    1. Re:More than half a dozen by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

      I built my own antenna and bolted it to some supports in the roof. It works gangbusters for pulling in channels 40+ miles away and only cost me about $20 in materials, plus a couple of hours to put it together and get it mounted. Mostly of the cost was the spool of aluminum grounding wire (intended for lightning rods).

      The plans

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:More than half a dozen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My problem is that even before digitization, I could only get one tv station in at kind of acceptable quality, two in at very poor quality, and there was one I could kind of see through the snow. I haven't tried since, but I live in the sticks and the situation has surely gotten worse for me, not better.

      So I can't get cable even if I want it, and I'd like an alternative I don't have to pay for, but an antenna ain't that.

      Luckily I can get internet access through a WISP, and watch Netflix. If not for that I'd have to do something with my life

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:More than half a dozen by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      There are any number of cheap amplified antennas, most of which are powered by the USB jack that most modern TVs have in back. Adding this to our TV bumped it from two or three sketchy-at-best channels to upward of 70 crystal clear ones. If you're at all interested in trying out OTA again, you might have better luck with something like that.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:More than half a dozen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've used television amplifiers before, they don't have the power to overcome this kind of interference. You can only polish a turd in a cryo environment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:More than half a dozen by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Those guys are still nuts over the Grey Hoverman, which I found to be supremely disappointing. It was no better than rabbit ears when I tried it.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:More than half a dozen by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I was hoping (for your viewing enjoyment) that it'd be like "huh, I should try that... OMG IT WORKS!"

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:More than half a dozen by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Just to reinforce what you're saying: yes, you can get a ton of free channels if you're in the right place and have the right antenna setup. When we moved into a small condo building a couple of years ago I noticed that there was a coax connection on the wall. I plugged my TV in and scanned for channels just on a lark. Well, from what I recall, it found about 160-180 channels! I'm in the Los Angeles / Orange County area about 35 miles from the transmitter antennas, and came to find out that our 4-story tall building has a full-size antenna on the roof that looks like it was professionally installed.

      Like you said, the majority of the channels is junk, but it's still worth the effort, I think, to try the best setup you can get if you are interested in getting free TV. If you follow the cord cutting news (cordcutternews.com is what I usually read, but there are also subreddits, etc), you will see that more and more OTA channels are being added fairly regularly. I think that this is a real trend, however small, of moving away from paid TV back to free OTA TV.

  19. Onion? by krakelohm · · Score: 1

    I feel like this is an onion story that WSJ picked up accidentally.

    --
    You are all a bunch of idots.
    1. Re:Onion? by kybred · · Score: 1

      I feel like this is an onion story that WSJ picked up accidentally.

      I thought the same thing.

  20. Re:Wait... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    This is digital. HDTV is ... digital.

    And you can still get old format analog too.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  21. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the headline for the next article will be "Millennials get butthurt whenever you mention them"

  22. Rabbit ears? by Shrubber · · Score: 1

    The Wall Street Journal article still managed to screw it up. Antennas known as rabbit ears were for receiving UHF channels. The antennas that pick up network broadcasts were never called that.

    1. Re:Rabbit ears? by RadioD00d · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm, no. Early televisions had dual telescoping antennas in a dipole configuration, for reception of VHF signals (channels 2-13). What you're thinking of is the 'bowtie' configuration that was used for UHF - that came later. The early dipoles were called 'rabbit ears' because you adjusted them at various angles to improve reception. Now, get off my lawn!

    2. Re:Rabbit ears? by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 2

      Close. Rabbit ears were for VHF, and that round / bow tie antenna was for UHF

    3. Re:Rabbit ears? by msauve · · Score: 2

      No, rabbit ears are VHF dipoles, made with 2 telescopic elements. Turn them to point them, adjust the length for the frequency.

      The corresponding UHF antenna is a "bow ties" (and often just a loop).

      Network broadcast stations were on both VHF and UHF.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Rabbit ears? by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      Network broadcast stations were on both VHF and UHF.

      We are a network affiliate! We complete with other network affiliates, not some punks broadcasting out of a closet! - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098546/

    5. Re:Rabbit ears? by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Actually the channels were 2 through 13 (not 3 through 13). I believe VHF low (2-6) has since been dropped, but someone can correct me if wrong.

    6. Re:Rabbit ears? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I thought rabbit ears were only used for the Playboy Channel?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:Rabbit ears? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Badgers! Badgers! We don't need no steenkeen badgers!

    8. Re:Rabbit ears? by the_denman · · Score: 1

      Channel 5 WOI-DT out of Des Moines still actually transmits on Channel 5, which can cause some issues for non VHF antennas. To help get around this they also have WOI-LD transmitting on channel 50 at a low power for the Des Moines Area. https://www.antennaweb.org/Sta...

    9. Re:Rabbit ears? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I just wrapped a coil of foil to bridge the two rabbit ears when I wanted to watch UHF.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    10. Re:Rabbit ears? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Rabbit ears are for VHF. Bowties or loops are for UHF.

    11. Re:Rabbit ears? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The TV we had when I was a kid had a channel 13 on the VHF dial.

  23. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by fropenn · · Score: 1

    I agree! We wouldn't put up with the same comment being made about a religious, ethnic, or gender group, so why is it okay to say it about an age group?
    (Note: I am not a millennial according to most definitions, but as a general rule I despise most "generational" research.)

  24. In another 5 years by drewsup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they will discover "radio" and forsake the AUX in jack they all live by...

    1. Re:In another 5 years by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that in five years all the companies will have had the courage to remove the AUX inputs from their devices.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:In another 5 years by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      And for sure they will discover that with ham radio you can talk just like with skype! Having them to embrace ARRL will be the last straw for a dead hobby.

  25. Not for me by kqc7011 · · Score: 2

    I would switch to a over the air antenna, but I live where the nearest broadcast tower is over 60 miles away and line of sight to that tower is blocked by hills. A neighbor down the block had a antenna hooked up to a TV in his garage, three channels (one major network, one PBS and one off brand) were watchable and it worked fairly well most of the time. He ran cable and a receiver into the garage and took down the antenna. Now he can watch what he wants. The downsides of living away from a major metropolitan area still have not counteracted the upsides of not living in one.

    --
    Passionately Indifferent
  26. Hipster? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Does this mean using TV antenna is a hipster thing now? Would that make all us old fuds hipsters before hipsters were cool? Or do you to be using the antenna ironically?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re: Hipster? by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 2

      The old fuds version of hipsters was when in the 80s, you had teens and movie stars dressing like they were from the....50s (punk leather and slick hair) and pop stars using the same music formula but with electronics. So....nothing has changed. Literally at all. We're going to have to have a WW3 and then another economic boom to reminisce over to end this shit.

  27. Millennial Manifesto violation by geekmux · · Score: 1

    You might be shocked about someone discovering OTA programming in the year 2017.

    I'm more shocked over the fact that he didn't know about a free product, which is a clear violation of the Millennial Manifesto.

  28. Bow-tie by PuddleBoy · · Score: 1

    I strongly recommend the bow-tie type of antenna. Works very well and doesn't break the bank (I think it's about $35 on amazon).

    If you get a smallish one, be sure to be aware of where your local broadcast towers are and point it towards those.

  29. Re:quality has improved by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

    The antennas haven't changed. Only the contents of the signals have changed.

    In fact, old analog antennas still make great TV antennas, as long as your channels haven't shifted from VHF to UHF (as has happened in some markets). Even then the old antenna will still probably work well enough in many circumstances.

  30. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Antennas are cool and all, but did the headline have to be sarcastic and condescending to millennials?

    When the level of ignorance exceeds a certain threshold, the end result is often sarcasm.

    That concept is way older than antennas or Millennials.

  31. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by fortfive · · Score: 2

    But it's about those wacky millenials!

  32. Not just millenials by dysmal · · Score: 2

    My girlfriend is 42 and was raised with cable TV and she never knew about using an antenna until she met me. The commercials suck but that's what the mute button is for.

    The only down side I've found is that if you have spotty reception, it's choppy (kind of like buffering). Whereas pre-DTV spotty reception was static but tolerable.

    1. Re:Not just millenials by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      The commercials suck but that's what the mute button is for.

      No, no, no! That's when you surf to another channel.

      At least until they come up with Blipverts...

    2. Re:Not just millenials by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem with the conversion to DTV is that because the signal is better at the same broadcast power, they reduced the output power for all stations so as not to conflict with other service areas. The end result being as you said, crappy reception if you aren't very near the transmitter.

  33. Too bad... by quetwo · · Score: 1

    Too bad the FCC just held an auction for a lot of the spectrum that these TV stations use. In many markets, half of the stations you can get over the air with "bunny ears" will go dark or cable-only within the next year. The spectrum is being sold off to the cell phone companies.

    1. Re:Too bad... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Too bad the FCC just held an auction for a lot of the spectrum that these TV stations use. In many markets, half of the stations you can get over the air with "bunny ears" will go dark or cable-only within the next year.

      If you are talking about white space, the spectrum is only in places where the stations aren't. Otherwise, citation please.

    2. Re: Too bad... by quetwo · · Score: 1

      No -- last summer the FCC allowed stations to enter into an auction for their active frequencies. This was for all stations that had an active UHF or VHF license. Many decided to participate in the auction and sell off their license.

      A consequence of this is that with half of the stations going away, the remaining stations' licenses will be consolidated and pushed to a lower frequency, with the higher frequencies then being re-assigned to cell companies. In places like Chicago, they are going from about 14 broadcasters with about 30 some virtual channels to about 7 broadcasters with about 16 virtual channels. The rest will go offline or just cable-tv only. I know in my area (Lansing, MI) we've already had two stations go dark since the auction finished (WHTV and whatever 50 was).

      Analog is dead and has been. A few low-power stations still have analog licenses, but anybody who has purchased a TV in the last 10 years hasn't been able to pick them up since very few come with NTSC OTA tuners anymore.

    3. Re:Too bad... by quetwo · · Score: 1

      Last summer the FCC allowed stations to enter into an auction for their active frequencies. This was for all stations that had an active UHF or VHF license. Many decided to participate in the auction and sell off their license.

      A consequence of this is that with half of the stations going away, the remaining stations' licenses will be consolidated and pushed to a lower frequency, with the higher frequencies then being re-assigned to cell companies.

      A 3-second google search comes up with the FCC site with all the details : https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/... with a list of all the stations going dark on this report : https://auctiondata.fcc.gov/pu...

    4. Re:Too bad... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      A 3-second google search comes up with the FCC site with all the details

      Thank you for the link.

      with a list of all the stations going dark on this report

      It is not quite the apocalypse that you make it sound like. The vast majority of those stations that are listed as "go off air" are also CSA "yes". A channel sharing agreement means they become another data stream on an existing broadcaster. I wouldn't call that "going dark" or "cable only", I'd call that a reasonable accommodation to the demand for more mobile services. Yes, if you never rescan for channels on your OTA tuner it will look like they "went dark", but once you do that scan you'll most likely (baring propagation issues) find them again.

  34. What's next.. radio? by bill.pev · · Score: 1

    No way!?!?

    How big a CPU do you need for this new "Rabbit Eye" technology?
    My dad talks about old TV from back in the day. Next you'll be telling me we can still get radio in our cars!

    [Personally I think it was all downhill once they took the build requirement out of the ham radio license exam.]

  35. Re:What happens when he talks on his iPhone? by dysmal · · Score: 1

    You don't talk on your iPhone silly. You talk into your Apple Watch!

    Actually... that would spiffy if there were a show where a person talked to their watch to communicate. Apple should patent that because no one EVER would have thought of that!!!

  36. Are people that stupid? by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes they are. When I first saw this ad I had to rewatch it several times because I couldn't believe what I was seeing. "Thanks to a federal government mandate, broadcasters must broadcast their shows... for free!" (I have a DVR - which doesn't always play nicely with antennae if you need to adjust them to get a signal! Which is why I naven't completely cut the cord from cable myself yet!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  37. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    We wouldn't put up with the same comment being made about a religious, ethnic, or gender group, so why is it okay to say it about an age group?

    Err..I have no problems saying anything about any group if it is true.

    Geez, you get too politically correct, and there becomes a real danger of anything being actually said.

    There are observable differences between groups of people on this earth, and there is nothing wrong with pointing it out.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  38. Better option - build your own! It's super easy by bjdevil66 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was posted here on slashdot years ago... I followed the instructions and it worked EXTREMELY well. When I hooked it up, it picked up 30-40 stations around the Phoenix metro area without a glitch. I used a scrap piece of 2x4, so I put the ugly thing up in the attic, and my entire house can hook into it. Less than $10 out of pocket (needed some washers, screws, and a UHF/VHF transformer from Radio Shack.)

    Coat Hanger HDTV Antenna

    1. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by PPH · · Score: 1

      What is this 'Radio Shack' place that you refer to?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      and a UHF/VHF transformer from Radio Shack

      All you need for DTV is a balun. The stations are all moved to UHF and the channel number is nominal historic label, rather than a frequency designator (much as phone number portability disconnected phone numbers from geographic locations).

      Now that the Shack is dying you can pick up TV baluns at hardware stores - for similarly low prices.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Better option - build your own! It's super easy by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      VHF is still in use for DTV. After the transition, some channels were moved back to the VHF band, in the U.S. at least.

      OK. So it just happened that all the stations where I am are UHF.

      That just means that, if you happen to live within range of one of those (and want to see it), you may need to add the couple extra elements to bring in the VHF signals.

      = = =

      One nice thing about DTV is that it's OFDM with FEC. That means multipath just makes the signal stronger, rather than creating ghosting and degrading the image. So the antenna generally doesn't have to sort out off-path signals to achieve error-free reception and can be very non-directional. In turn, that means that a simple antenna can pick up good signals from many directions. Frequency allocation generally keeps any TV stations you can receive (without strong amplification) from interfering with any others ditto at any given place, at least in the US (though you may find a few fringe-range stations that share an air channel with something nearby.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  39. Sales of antennas will up 7% by Cha0s_Agent · · Score: 1

    What's that, like 10 antennae?

  40. Full retro by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Well at least millennials will get to experience the joys of constantly re-positioning an antenna to get a decent signal. The difference is they can tweet about it to the word instead of complaining about it to the people in the room.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Full retro by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I don't need to do that since I bought an amplified fractal antenna - box about the size of a large laptop with a wall wart that I keep under the TV though high probably would be better, I get stations 75 miles away even.

  41. Re: Sarcastic & Condescending by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    Wifi inside of wires? Preposterous. And what the hell is "CAT5"? Sounds like a classification for crazy cat ladies...

  42. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reads like an Onion article

  43. Article is annoying but accurate by jandrese · · Score: 2

    OTA TV has gone through something of a resurgence after the switchover to digital. There are way more channels on the air today then there were 10 years ago. This happened at the same time cable started raising their prices unsustainably so people are coming back and finding all sorts of channels that they would actually watch. Combine this with inexpensive online streaming options and Cable's $70+ monthly price point is a bad joke.

    In my area we have all of the big networks (ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, CW, 7 PBS channels), plus Cozi, MeTV, Charge, Comet, TBI, Bounce, Justice, GetTV, Grit, Escape, MyTV, Movies, HgI, Retro, ion, ThisTV, and a ton of foreign channels. The only things I'm missing even a little are FX and AMC.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Article is annoying but accurate by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I found that a simple piece of wire shoved into the center connection of a coaxial jack usually worked, even with DTV. Ghetto, yes, but who goes around checking the back of people's television sets, and why would I care what they thought anyway. I haven't owned a TV set in years and I don't miss it as a Hulu subscription and Youtube is more than enough for me, and I would rather not spend most of my waking hours loading up on the moronic crap that is usually broadcast anyway. I have a good old fashioned radio just in case for really big emergencies

  44. And because reality doesn't have to make sense ... by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    My favorite part of this story is that they're doing it so they can see the commercials. Cable company execs are probably losing their minds over this.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  45. Re:quality has improved by Mr.+Competence · · Score: 1

    I hooked up the old OTA antenna in my attic and get dozens of channels. HDHomerun, NPVR, MCE Buddy, Comskip and Kodi complete the set.

    --
    Those who open their minds too far often let their brains fall out.
  46. All that hassle to see commercials? by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

    Anyone who is 'disappointed' not to see commercials on TV needs to re-evaluate her/his life. Or is this a new 'millenial' hipster trend?

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  47. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 2

    I wonder how many TV show execs have forgotten about over-the-air broadcasting and will be surprised to hear this.

    On the other hand, you need to be in a good location to receive a view-able signal. While we still have an antenna on the roof of our house, we located in a marginal area for reception. With analog broadcasting, just meant a little random "snow" in the image. Now that broadcasting has gone all digital, we get a lot of freezes and "pixel blocking", making the image unview-able. (I still try the antenna signal a few times per year. At night, with clear skies, I can get a marginally view-able image - at best.)

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  48. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    But does it have layers?

    Lunch is over, time for a parfait.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  49. Not farfetched by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, an acquaintance was between jobs, controlling his budget, and had dropped his cable subscription. He knew about broadcast TV, but the thought of getting an exterior antenna (more money), mounting it on a roof, wiring it, aiming, etc. was daunting. I told him that where I lived, a plain old FM dipole antenna was sufficient to pull in all of the major local channels, since FM radio is close to TV channel 6. I could get sufficient signal for testing a new TV, say, just by pinning the dipole to the ceiling in the correct orientation. I had several FM dipoles sitting in a box, from various receivers I'd had over the years. I gave him one of mine and he was back in business, at least for the basics.

    Years ago, I built a log periodic VHF antenna out of some random wooden stakes, some string, and some extra wire I had, put it in an unused upstairs bedroom, and aimed it at the nearest large city's towers. That was more than sufficient and cost practically nothing. We renamed the room the antenna room.

    1. Re:Not farfetched by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      Or you can get a prepackaged flat antenna for around $15 that you can stick on the wall with a command strip...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    2. Re:Not farfetched by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I went through the antenna building phase too. They worked, but even when it's behind the TV a 2x4 with some clothes hangers and wires hanging on it just isn't appealing.

      I just bit the bullet and bought a Mohu Leaf a few years back and not only does it look better, it also works better than any of the homemade antennas I ever made.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  50. Re:digital channels by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    50 miles west of Chicago, I get about 40 digital channels, most with perfect pictures from my attic antenna.
    Free, but some channels are in Spanish and Polish !

    The transition to digital was painless and good,
    more channels, better picture.

    I wouldn't exactly call it "painless", but probably overall a good thing.

    I still feel like certain channel frequencies should have been left operational if only for public safety and emergency purposes. You do not need transistors to wire up a black-and-white analog signal television receiver.

  51. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Yea Millenials... For the most part it isn't that they found a new discovery, it is just with the Antenna they can watch local show, and use streaming services for the rest.

    The way it was written made it seem like it was really a new thing... However there are few things about the newer technology that we should realize.
    1. Most New TVs do not come built in with an Antenna.
    2. Old TVs with Antenna normally will not support our current digital standards.
    Both 1 and 2 means the person will need to make a conscious decision to go with an Antenna. Vs. the good old day which it was the default state of having a TV.
    3. Late Boomers and Early Gen-X who birth the Millennials with their wonderful middle class life style and salaries and cost of living mostly designed for the middle class, could afford Cable TV so their kids grew up with Cable TV as the normal for life.
    4. These Millenials are starting to move out of their parents house as the economy is getting better and college debts are getting paid. So they getting their own place, and will need to get their own TV's and other things, thus making a decision on what to use.
    5. Cable TV has gown down the tubes. (No pun attended) BBC America Plays mostly Star Trek, and Doctor Who. Lifetime keeps on playing My 600 lbs life... All the channels seems to be stuck on a binge watch loop, which I don't want on my broadcast TV, that is what streaming is for. I want to see variety, so if I am board I can channel surf and find something new. Back in the older days, Cable TV had variety, BBC America played British Shows. Discover had educational content. History channel had historical documentaries.....
    6. Local Channels are still competitive. Being the Cable stations stink, the Local Channels are still producing new content. So you get the channels you want to view over the Antenna.

    This story isn't how Millenials are discovering the Antenna, but are choosing it over the alternatives.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  52. Just fell out of my chair laughing my ass off by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Once again, I'm 'cool' before something was 'cool' to start with.

    TEN YEARS AGO, roughly, I dumped cable, and built an HDTV antenna, with supplies from Home Depot, Ace Hardware, and the Dollar Store (plastic cutting board, to cut insulators out of). I was unemployed and decided to cut my expenses. One of the best decision I ever made.

    These days I have a commercially-made antenna with twice as many elements. Also a great investment. Need to add a small VHF antenna and a diplexer to it though, for the two channels that are still in that band.

    ..and NOW they're seeing the light? LOL. Welcome to the OTA Broadcast Master Race, Millennials! ;-)

  53. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by phoenix_orb · · Score: 2

    Get a powered signal amplifier

    They are $25 bucks on Amazon for a decent one.

    I lived rurally for many years. Makes a hell of a difference.

    --
    Blah Blah Blah.
  54. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd put up with anyone saying anything about any group.

    Quit being a little bitch

  55. Re:And because reality doesn't have to make sense by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    Superbowl commercials have been a *thing* for a long while now. It's been the carrot dangled in front of non-sport watching spouses and friends for a good decade, or two.

  56. Re: Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's a new bulldozer class, similar to the CAT D6R XL.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  57. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh boy oh boy oh boy!
    Millennials Millen nials Mi llennials Millen nials Millenni als Millenn ials Mil lennials Millenni als Millennials Millennials
    Millennials Millennials Millennials Millennials Millennials
    Millennials Millen nials Millennia ls Millenn ials Millennials Millennials Millennials
    Millennials Mille nnials Millennials

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  58. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Him being a millennial really has nothing to do with this.

    It has EVERYTHING to do with the story. Imagine if I was talking about my "discovery" of animal-pulled cars...

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  59. Not unless they're forced by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    You couldn't get me back to radio kicking and screaming. I don't need no stinkin' payola fueled music. If all else fails I've got 30 gigs of ripped CDs on a 64gb card in my phone. Plus I've got podcasts for all my hobbies/political leanings.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  60. Antenna and Digital Signals by TimSchutte · · Score: 1

    I have DishNetwork, and the signal craps out during rain or snow. Thankfully, I still have a 'rabbit ears' antenna that works fairly well. But in the old days of analog TV, if the signal wavered, I got a little snow. But with today's digital signals the picture stutters, tears and gets all sorts of weird effects! Give me an analog signal anytime!

    1. Re:Antenna and Digital Signals by dysmal · · Score: 1

      Ditto on the analog signal. I can handle a little static (AM radio for sports games) but the stutter can be maddening.

  61. Totally believe it by rbrander · · Score: 1

    Please stop expressing disbelief, people.

    I got a nice antenna at Radio Shack when my wife and I got pissed at the ninth time our cable company raised the monthly a few bucks and we realized it had gone up over 20%, vewy, vewy quietwy. ("Elmer Fudd increases", we called them). It was a period of our lives when that extra $100+ per month was significant. So for anybody where >$1000/year is real money all the time, the shock is that more people haven't discovered this, so I hope that article gets wide play.

    That was about 3 years ago, and everybody who's seen the antenna asks about it and expresses surprise that it exists, that we have one, that we get along with that as enough. This is people old and young. People haven't forgotten the *technology*, but they have forgotten the *practice* of using an antenna.

    It always gives me a chance to express one of my favourite rants, which is that OTA broadcasts have a *regulated quality*, so they always look good, whereas all the private media, (where the provider owns the transmission infrastructure, be it cable, phone or satellite), are allowed to throw you any resolution JUUUUST good enough to keep you from cancelling. 8Mb/s for the Superbowl, sure, but for less-popular shows, they'll run the bandwidth down until somebody's nose is a single big pixel....and back up 10% when people actually leave.

    When idealogues rant about privatization and government can't do anything right, I just show them OTA transmissions. TV quality has been publicly regulated and privately regulated and you can see what it does.

  62. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    There's only three things older than sarcasm, in the following order:
    1. sex
    2. money
    3. politics

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  63. Re:quality has improved by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Is an empty Pringles can VHF or UHF?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  64. Won't work in Canada by Lirodon · · Score: 1

    Firstly, due to federal policy, all broadcasters are effectively discouraged from operating digital subchannels on their stations, despite the fact that we use the same television standards as Americans, by requiring a multitude of regulatory hurdles to be cleared before you can get permission to do so. Furthermore, due to almost all major broadcasters being vertically integrated with pay television providers, there is little incentive to actually invest in over-the-air television beyond mandatory carriage in the markets where they do end up operating, since it's more profitable to collect subscriber fees for a "new" channel where 90% of the content is literally just recycled from its sister channels, forcibly bundled alongside 2-5 more channels (despite being required to do so, providers also discourage a la carte options by making them as unattractive as possible and giving them little promotion). Hence, we do not have the wide array of options over-the-air as there are in the U.S. or the United Kingdom (given how consolidated the networks are here, maybe a model closer to Freeview could work here). Additionally, because the majority have pay TV here, broadcasters largely cut down on their OTA transmitters during the digital transition to save costs..

    1. Re:Won't work in Canada by rbrander · · Score: 1

      Ummm...I'm the previous poster. I started off in Calgary, where I got just 2 channels really well, a 3rd most of the time (could be dodgy during day, better at night, which isn't much of a problem).

      In Vancouver, it's better: crystal-clear on all the three major Canadian networks 7x24, plus 3 more-local channels, two of which I admit are useless to me as an English speaker, though I sometimes wish I knew what the hell they were talking about on "The Harpreet Singh Show"; you never see such animated conversations on Kimmel. But especially for the local Asian populations, I think those channels are a nice bit of local community building.

      I'm not sure what you were expecting beyond the 3 major networks, I assure you that's all we had in the standard-def "rabbit ears" broadcast days.

    2. Re:Won't work in Canada by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >I'm not sure what you were expecting beyond the 3 major networks, I assure you that's all we had in the standard-def "rabbit ears" broadcast days.

      Ha! I'm from the 'burbs of Toronto, and got stations from Hamilton, Toronto, and Buffalo. 10 base channels: 5 CBLT (CBC) / 9 CFTO / 11 CHCH / 19 CICO (TVO) / 41 CIII (Global) / 47 CFMT / 57(prev. 79) CITY from Canada, then 19 and 23 (American PBS), and 29 Fox.

      Maybe more, those are just the ones I can remember. But you know what? I still remember going around and around the dial looking for something to watch that wasn't an ad.

      I don't miss FTA anymore than I miss cable.

    3. Re:Won't work in Canada by Lirodon · · Score: 1

      It only works in Canada if you live close to the border. I used to live near Detroit, now I don't. The only major networks the closest city to me actually has OTA, are CBC (English and French), CTV, and Global. City is cable only (having taken over the province's "educational" broadcaster), and CBC doesn't even have a station anymore in the province's second major population centre (Saskatoon) because the CBC said they would only convert their originating stations to digital in digital transition markets, and not rebroadcasters (it was technically just a translator of CBC in Regina but with Saskatoon commercials). That's only five channels OTA in Regina, and two in Saskatoon, all with only one channel each (in a perfect world CTV could run CTV Two on subchannels, but less they incur the wraith of the CRTC). The closest U.S. city I could theoretically pull from is Williston, North Dakota, which is around 150 miles south. "wide array" includes not only major networks, but independents, as well as those digital subchannel networks.

    4. Re:Won't work in Canada by Lirodon · · Score: 1

      Yes, we transitioned to digital OTA television (ATSC), but the CRTC doesn't let broadcasters use digital subchannels willy-nilly unlike the U.S. The CRTC, on the other hand, has been progressively deregulating aspects of specialty/cable TV (unlike the U.S., all cable channels also must be licensed)

  65. Yeah by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Where are my hourly stories about what Trump has done today? Slashdot might as well just repost all his tweets as stories. That way I get up to the minute Trump news scattered with week old tech news.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  66. Re:UK TV Licence by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Black and white license? The UK government is racist! What about yellow, brown, and red people?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  67. Re:What happens when he talks on his iPhone? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    A TV show where a person talks into a watch? Don't be a Dick.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  68. Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    joys of constantly re-positioning an antenna to get a decent signal.

    One of the benefits of analog signals is that they "degenerated" more gracefully than the compressed digital signals now in use for broadcast in most areas.

    The analog signal may be snowy or have streaks under poor signals, but you could still see most of the image. With compressed signals, signal loss often results in ungodly distortions from a Cubists' nightmare. Faces can look really grotesque as the cubist distortions move with the head's movement. When I first saw it I questioned the contents of my salad and drank lots of water.

    1. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by sconeu · · Score: 1

      This.

      This was almost exactly my commentary when the analog signal was finally killed.

      Analog degrades gracefully.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I've always found noise in analog signals to be less distracting than noise in digital signals.

    3. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I imagine seeing this would scare the bejeezus out of a toddler. Even as an adult, I feel unnerved when the signal breaks up and it looks like someone's face is being held under some weirdly textured cloth, and it's like they are struggling to break free. Skipped key frames (which causes this, if I am correct) in a video stream can lead to some very bizarre visual effects.

    4. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      At least the snow storm of the analog signal of yore was not nearly as scary as a modern compressed digital signal breaking up. Nightmare Fuel indeed!

    5. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I think because the brain is trained to filter out the snow that you usually see in an analog broadcast, because our own eyes give a snowy picture! (caused by "floaters" in the eyeballs among other things). This is most noticeable in a completely dark room. Digital break ups causes boxes and other jarring, unnatural artifacts to appear on screen and often causes the picture to freeze as well. Way harder for our brains to filter out.

    6. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by mikael · · Score: 1

      The freakiest thing I saw was a gardening show when the JPEG blocks from the flowers got transplanted onto the faces of the gardeners leaving just their eyes and mouths. I had nightmares for days afterwards.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Even with non-HD digital cable displaying without any transmission garbles, the compression artifacts are bad enough that I can't watch it for more than a few minutes.

    8. Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I kind of got used to it (desensitized), but I was also quite freaked out at first. I was in a little restaurant with dodgy TV reception and lost my appetite because of some of the really freaky distortions. I had to toss half my food.

      I've read about the bad side of other's LSD trips, and this matched it pretty well. I hope somebody sues: this is Bad Tech.

  69. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    In the UK, we have Freeview "digital" TV. The old analog terrestial signals were shut down and everyone forced to get a digital decoder box for reception. They also had to get a larger aerial plus signal amplifier. The good side was that you could get dozens of channels, but these varied from region to region as different transmitters carry different stations.

    Linux does have digital TV and you need a USB DVB-T signal converter in order to receive and record video on a Linux PC. That requires a channel scan to be done first (w_scan).
    https://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/i...

    Some USB receivers have mini antennae, but I've never found them to work in any location, not even in the countryside or a downtown hotel.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  70. Tinfoul! by McLae · · Score: 1

    Tinfoil makes the signal clearer. But only if you fold it just right. A lost art....

    1. Re:Tinfoul! by rbrander · · Score: 1

      Not lost! It combined "inherent body capacitance" with modern dance, and was assigned to the youngest family member, since kids under 10 prefer to watch the TV from arms-length to start with.

      My interpretive dance entitled "Getting Batman and the last half of Man from UNCLE to come in because the bastards scheduled them against each other" still draws appreciative reviews at family reunions to this day.

  71. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    I have tried half a dozen different antennaes, with and without the amplifier. Our reception is little better than UCPenguin describes. And we live at the edge town; not out in the boonies or up in the mountains. Digital broadcast sucks.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  72. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by PPH · · Score: 1

    And some manufacturers' OTA tuners are shit. Fortunately, there are stand-alone DTV tuners with great sensitivity and multipath rejection. Some that have a PVR function when an external disk drive is added.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  73. Advice for beginners who use linux by shoor · · Score: 5, Informative

    All of my TV watching is OTA broadcast. I used to record analog with TV capture cards. I also used them to 'digitize' my old VHS tape recordings so I could get rid of the VHS tapes. (Digitizing preserved the recordings, and also allowed quicker access since I didn't have to fast forward to watch something recorded on the tail end of a 6 or 8 hour tape.)

    When the USA switched to digital by mandate, I had to adjust. It took some doing and maybe I can offer some useful tips. A lot of stuff is European which uses a different system than the USA which uses ATSC. So, if you're European, or if you're searching the 'net and come across some European software like say kaffeine, beware.

    MythTV gets a lot of attention. I never got it to work and it seems like overkill to me anyway. What I use is me-tv. That's an unfortunate name because if you google me-tv you get a lot of false hits.

    Me-tv doesn't work well with ubuntu (something about gui libraries.) It also doesn't work very well with pclinuxos. But it works very well with Mint and Devuan! It's not really good for watching 'live'. But, you can start it recording and then watch the recording while it's being recorded with vlc or mplayer or something like that, and, depending on when you start watching or how far you've skipped ahead, you may be only seconds behind the live broadcast. Also with those players you can pause, go back, whatever, while it's continuing to record the program.

    When you've installed me-tv and first start it up, you do a scan and it finds the local TV stations. Then edit the channels list it created. Also be sure to edit the preferences as the default settings can be pretty wrongheaded, like starting a recording 5 minutes in advance and continuing after you've specified it should stop. You can put it in your 'startup applications' with the invocation /usr/bin/me-tv -s -m. This way it will start up automatically in the background and quietly record programs you have specified. But, if you're using a USB stick that has custom firmware this might not work because the OS has to find and configure the USB before it starts me-tv. My pcHDTV hardware has no problem because it's hardware support is build into the kernel, but with my Hauppauge TV stick, I have to worry about timing.

    Some stations will broadcast several programs at once and you can record several at a time if they use the same base carrier signal. If the station is broadcasting in full HDTV you get a nice high res picture. If they multiplex several shows, which happens a lot for local community and religious stations, you'll get a lower res picture. But there's a lot out there. If you like some of the PBS programs like 'Nova', it's nice to get the high resolution videos of nature. (Just so you won't think I'm too much of a culture vulture, I also watch 'Supernatural', and see it in all its 1280 by 1024 glory.)

    If you use a hauppauge tv tuner stick you have to copy a small file to /lib/firmware to get it to work. For my particular hauppauge the file name is xc3028-v27.fw, but it probably varies dpending on whihc model you have. Besides hauppauge, I've used pcHDTV which works 'out of the box' on newer systems.

    I hope this saves some of you some of the pain I went through getting all of this to work.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
    1. Re:Advice for beginners who use linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What I use is me-tv. That's an unfortunate name because if you google me-tv you get a lot of false hits.

      When you lead with an acknowledgement that most Google results are false hits, you might consider including a proper link so we don't have to wade through the bad ones. Just a thought.

    2. Re:Advice for beginners who use linux by shoor · · Score: 1

      Y'know, it's been awhile since I tried searching for a me-tv website. I just did, with "me-tv linux" as keywords. I came up with a slew of sites that seemed to be relevant, but I didn't know which to recommend. I just download what Mint or Devuan has. The last time I checked, me-tv wasn't being maintained and looking for a volunteer. If it had been written in C, I might have considered taking on the job myself, but it's written in C++, originally by some cobber from down under.

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  74. Not worth the $20 by Shotgun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the Raleigh-Durham area of North Carolina, there is very little to see OTA, unless you want to watch reruns of 60's sit-coms (Green Acres, The Beverly Hillbillies, etc) or westerns, so interspersed with adds for senior citizens (literally: "I've fallen and I can't get up", walk in bath tubs, scooter chairs, etc.)

    I've watched a bit for nostalgia (that's what was on daytime TV when I was a kid), and the cheesiness was unsettling, but it is not something that I would call "entertainment".

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  75. Re:Unfortunately, won't work for me... :( by PPH · · Score: 2

    Try a directional high gain rooftop antenna. Perhaps one with a built-in RF amplifier. I can pick up Seattle stations from about 60 miles away, down in a valley.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  76. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "I wonder how many TV show execs have forgotten about over-the-air broadcasting and will be surprised to hear this."

    And how surprised they will be if they discover that all those stations stream their program free over the internet.
    Not need to spend money on rabbit ears.

  77. DirecTV suprised I knew of this years ago by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Setting up the account was asked if I wanted local TV and said No, theres an antenna input in it's rear. Was told how surprised I'd be at many didn't know they could do that.

  78. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    In the UK, you also need a TV license if you use one and the companies that sell them are required by law to notify the TV licensing agency of your address when you do. You'll then be harassed by the company that the government outsources license fee collection to until you either pay, let them inspect your house to verify that you're not receiving broadcast TV, or take them to court.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  79. That's what DVRs and commercial skip are for by alispguru · · Score: 1

    I recently upgraded from a 10-year-old TiVo HD to a Bolt. Both of them allow fast-forward commercial skipping, and the Bolt's SkipMode makes commercials disappear completely.

    Yes, monthly service is expensive, as is lifetime service. TiVo was kind/desperate enough recently to move my lifetime service from the old machine to the new one for $100.

    I never watch commercial TV live.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  80. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    1. Most New TVs do not come built in with an Antenna.

    Most old TVs did not come with a built-in antenna. You used rabbit ears externally.

    Being the Cable stations stink, the Local Channels are still producing new content.

    Other than local news programs or a few really bottom rate local celebrity shows ("Rick Dancer TV", e.g., or "Betty Snowden", both local to here. One Portland station has a version of "Today" that is much better, but they're the exception to the rule.), local stations produce nothing but profit by showing either network programming or by striping reruns of popular network programming. Or infomercials.

    So you get the channels you want to view over the Antenna.

    Depending on conditions, I get anywhere from four to six channels. Four of those (the always ones) are four streams of PBS programming from the transmitter about ten miles away on the local mountaintop. The others are occasional CW and Fox.

    Yes, get an amplifier, it "works wonders" one person said. Amplifying noise results in noise. Amplifying the local signal results in distorted signal that doesn't decode properly. I love digital OTA.

  81. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I haven't been able to get a decent OTA signal since the switchover (if I can get a signal at all). On the other hand, that got me to pretty much stop watching TV, so there's an upside.

  82. Which ISP is hostile to telecommuters? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Could you name and shame the ISP that refused business service to you when you told the ISP you want a business connection because you work from home?

  83. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    Most old TVs did not come with a built-in antenna. You used rabbit ears externally.

    Wha? I remember pretty much all TVs coming with a built-in antenna, usually of the telescoping variety. Cheap ones would come with an external antenna you had to snap on.

  84. A $750 DVR by tepples · · Score: 1

    I only use the Tivo OTA Roamio to DVR my over the air stations

    A lot of people don't have $750 in a single month to pay for a $200 TiVo DVR and a $550 All-In Plan. The All-In Plan alone could pay for several years of the difference between home Internet-only service and home Internet with bundled TV.

    1. Re:A $750 DVR by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people don't have $750 in a single month to pay for a $200 TiVo DVR and a $550 All-In Plan. The All-In Plan alone could pay for several years of the difference between home Internet-only service and home Internet with bundled TV.

      Not sure what your'e talking about.

      The Tivo Roamio, 1TB with lifetime plan was only about $399 for me awhile back.

      Just checked on amazon Tivo same $399 price.

      Looking at the Tivo website: Yep, scroll down to bottom of page, only Same $399 all inclusive price...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:A $750 DVR by Meski · · Score: 1

      Is Tivo still running there? (they're cancelling the service here (AU) from the end of October))

  85. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    Wha? I remember pretty much all TVs coming with a built-in antenna, usually of the telescoping variety.

    Only some portable TVs. The good, sturdy ones that came in a large wooden box had connectors on the back for an external antenna. That's because the tube amplifiers inside needed more signal than an internal antenna could provide.

  86. Re:caveats about using a usb stick by shoor · · Score: 1

    I'm replying to my own post because I feel I should have explained more about using a USB stick, which is probably what a lot of people would do.

    In my experience, the OS has to boot up and load the firmware before you even plug in the USB stick. This means, for example, that if I set up my computer to turn on in the middle of night (setting this up in the BIOS) just so it can record a late night movie, I have to use my pcHDTV card. Because I won't be there to plug in the USB stick after the thing has booted up. Also, having me-tv autostart won't work. If I plug in the usb stick after me-tv is running, me-tv won't see it. I have to kill me-tv and restart it.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  87. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Free? no not free at all. Added benefit yes and after the net neutrality rules get thrown out its going to cost a lot more to get those shows, corporations profits first everyone else who cares.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  88. Re:quality has improved by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

    Pringles cans are resonant at about 2.4 GHz, so really high UHF. Not the ideal frequencies for TV channels, although if the signal is strong enough, even a paper clip will work.

  89. Seriously? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    I'm not a millenial, I'm a full-blown X-gen (born in 1971), and have been cord-free from 2009, (if it wasn't for the free cable TV my employer gave me for free, I'd be a cord-never. Even then, I had a VHS deck hooked up to an antenna for free TV. I've been recording and watching OTA for the last 10-15 years, and it's not that expensive. Buy an OTA antenna (not the preamplified shit), and some kind of DVR (channelmaster or build your own, One machine is running BeyondTV, I'm building a MythTV one), pair that with a Netflix subscrition and all the related online services, and I've got more TV hours to watch than I'll live.

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  90. ATSC virtual channel numbers by tepples · · Score: 1

    I thought that with ATSC virtual channel numbers, stations could just move to an available frequency in the UHF band and keep their channel number branding.

    1. Re:ATSC virtual channel numbers by quetwo · · Score: 1

      True -- assuming that they didn't sell off their broadcasting license -- which quite a few did. A list of all the stations going dark is at : https://auctiondata.fcc.gov/pu...

  91. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Amen to that, a 12.99 OTA tuner with USB recording does the job (very slowly, but then 13$)

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  92. needs more avacodo toast angst by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This should be "How Millenials are Killing Cable TV with this ONE WEIRD TRICK"

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:needs more avacodo toast angst by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      But then no one here would read it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  93. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Zecheus · · Score: 1
    Try the tvfool.com to find the distance from the sources in your area to your antenna's mount. Then, find an antenna which is rated for that distance. Sometimes a powered amplifier is needed to boost signal. In some installations, a rotor mount is useful. A directional antennas can support longer distances. Some locations can be in range of sources from multiple directions.

    For the 29% who don't know OTA TV is free, you should also know there is no such thing as an 'High Definition Antenna'

  94. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    They also had to get a larger aerial plus signal amplifier.

    We didn't all have to.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  95. Living Across The Pond... by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Living Across the Pond in rainy old England, this comes across as an April Fool 123 days late. But then suggestions in 2016 that Trump would win would also come across as April 1 jokes too.

    --
    John_Chalisque
  96. HOLY CRAP! by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    Next they might discover the special box where you can get music and news absolutely free and you don't have to subscribe to anything to use it! Some of these exotic devices can run off of a single "AAA" battery! The only downsides is that you can't change the playlist, and there are usually commercials, but I bet the millennials will crap their pants in amazement when they discover radio!

    1. Re:HOLY CRAP! by Megane · · Score: 1

      Some of those devices also play silver-colored discs that can contain music and can even be played without an internet connection!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  97. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Get a powered signal amplifier

    They are $25 bucks on Amazon for a decent one.

    I lived rurally for many years. Makes a hell of a difference.

    The problem with amplifiers is that they amplify both the signal and the noise.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  98. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 3, Informative

    Make sure your antenna receives UHF in addition to VHF. Lots of older antennas were VHF-only (channels 2-13).

    Remember that the digital channel number shown on the screen now doesn't necessarily correlate to the actual radio channel. In our area, digital channel 7 (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) is transmitted at the pre-digital channel 21 frequency band.

    An outdoor antenna with an outdoor amplifier is also recommended for fringe or rural areas.

    Broadcast TV works pretty well in our rural area. Lots of people have dumped $60-120/month satellite subscriptions.

  99. I saw Super Bowl LI OTA, via an antenna by rickb928 · · Score: 2

    ...because Centurylink had a 36+ hour total outage in my area, starting Saturday night.

    To this day no explanation, no apology, no rebate or refund for service not delivered. When my 'contract', triggered by signing up for automatic pay, expires, they will see me gone. I would rather have DirecTV than Prism ever again.

    Ever. I just won't pay extra to leave.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  100. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

    Or ignore them. I've been getting letters addressed to 'The Legal Occupier' for years telling me they are starting an investigation, proceeding with an investigation or even 'an agent will be visiting your address on this date'. I ignore them all and have yet to have a visit from anyone. I guess putting a letter in the bin every few months could be considered annoying, but not sure I'd count it as harassment (it does bring me pleasure though, so maybe I'm just odd).

    If they want into my house they can bring me the court order otherwise they have no more legal right to enter my house than any other random stranger. For the record I have bought a couple of antenna in the last couple of years from Amazon (for someone else, I don't watch over the air tv) but I can't say its made any difference to their 'investigations'.

  101. But how can you reliably record OTA TV? I can't by cshay · · Score: 1

    I only use antenna TV for NFL football. I would use it for ALOT more viewing if I could reliably record it, but I can't.

    You see, the major networks have antennas located in 3-4 different locations in my area.

    In order to watch a station, I must first aim the antenna in the direction of the antenna. Then I must do small tweaks because if it isn't exactly right, the signal goes in an out. (and this being digital, we aren't talking about a little snow). And inexplicably the "perfect" location for the antenna seems to vary from one day to the next.

    And of course one station uses VHF (rabbit ears) and the rest use UHF (bow ties), but that's just one more headache I won't get into here.

    Anyone in my situation and did you manage to solve it so that you can set up a DVR reliably?

  102. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    "I wonder how many TV show execs have forgotten about over-the-air broadcasting and will be surprised to hear this."

    And how surprised they will be if they discover that all those stations stream their program free over the internet.
    Not need to spend money on rabbit ears.

    Shhhh!

    Don't remind them; or they'll start making us USians get a "TV License" like the UKians have to...

  103. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Make sure your antenna receives UHF in addition to VHF. Lots of older antennas were VHF-only (channels 2-13).

    Remember that the digital channel number shown on the screen now doesn't necessarily correlate to the actual radio channel. In our area, digital channel 7 (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) is transmitted at the pre-digital channel 21 frequency band.

    An outdoor antenna with an outdoor amplifier is also recommended for fringe or rural areas.

    Broadcast TV works pretty well in our rural area. Lots of people have dumped $60-120/month satellite subscriptions.

    Speaking of this, most of the indoor "DTV" antennas sold into US markets concentrate on UHF reception almost exclusively. If they get VHF at ALL, it's generally an afterthought.

    Unfortunately, where I live, one of the major network affiliates (the CBS one) is still broadcasting on VHF, and the "DTV" antenna I purchased just BARELY picks it up. Flat terrain, no tall buildings or other things between me and the transmitting antenna, and the transmitter is only about 15 miles away.

    So, do you (or other Slashdotters) have any suggestions regarding an INDOOR, amplified antenna that gets good reception on what's left of the VHF band, and the other UHF-bands that DTV in the U.S. is using? Bonus points if it passes the FM Radio Broadcast band, too...

  104. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

    Not an indoor antenna, but the RCA 751 is only 3 ft long and works great. It can be mounted on a wall, under the eaves of a house. It even comes with the mount, which is identical to the common sat TV mount.

  105. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    I don't think this is your issue, but I've been using rabbit ears since HDTV was introduced. My Gen I TV/Tuner had horrible reception. My Gen II TV/Tuner circa 2007 was much better. My last TV tuner(2011-ish) is even better at capturing signals. I'm not sure what they did to the tuner chip, but if you have an old TV, a newer one may have better reception with the same rabbit ears.

  106. And you can record shows by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    I'll plug the ChannelMaster DVR... uses your external HDD, so you can use that spare one pulled from your lappie when you converted to SSD. The program guide is optional (over your internet) but free, and no ongoing fees unlike Tivo, which was the dealbreaker for me.

    Note very well: has some internet streaming options including Sling and Youtube, but you CANNOT record those, just the OTA TV.

    1. Re:And you can record shows by Megane · · Score: 1

      I had the older version of their OTA DVR. It was sad when Rovi (the company that brought us Macrovision) suddenly shut down the OTA TV Guide service. It was great having two weeks of guide data. Now you're lucky to get 24 hours. Why? Because TV set manufacturers suck, and some older (and probably not-so-old) TV sets can't handle that much guide data, so stations don't send much.

      I just checked, and all but three of my local stations have 24 hour guide data. Of the other three (at least 8 sub-channels total) one has 36 hours, and the other two have 72 hours of data.

      Sure, I could subscribe to a feed for my MythTV, and reading the EPG data on my Hauppage cards sometimes hoses it such that I have a cron job to detect it and reboot, but free is free, dammit.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  107. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by hey! · · Score: 2

    Boomer here. You sound like a Gen X'er who's having a little difficulty with the generational succession thing; let me help you out.

    On the plus side, your're older and wiser now. Congratulations. That's something you should feel proud of.

    On the minus side you are no longer cool. You are the opposite of cool. It happens almost overnight. Yesterday you and your cohort were on top of the world, the center of attention, the apple of the media's eye; but when you woke up to day you didn't realize it, but you'd become the generational equivalent of a fish left out on the counter over a hot summer's night.

    So the millennials have discovered something you've known all along. You laugh, and look around and notice nobody is laughing with you. That's because you haven't figured it out yet: knowledge isn't cool until someone cool knows it. And that's not you. Nor for practical purposes anyone else over 30.

    Now I suppose you could console yourself with the idea that the millennials will learn this very same lesson, but I say wish them well and let them enjoy their fleeting moment as the center of the universe, because soon you'll be feeling the icy winds of mortality at your back. That's a reminder to focus on what's important.

    And what people think of you just isn't very important. What people think of other people is even less so.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  108. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Yup, I was thinking it read like an April Fools story.

  109. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    That's why my mother got satellite, because when the broadcasters went digital she no longer got reception for anything except one channel that was spotty. Analog works great, and it has a gradual loss of quality instead of a rapid dropoff that digital has. She wasn't in a position to experiment with powered antennas or installing them, or even knowing they existed.

  110. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    I remember that. Bought a TV card from Dixons, had to fill in the pink form at checkout. Got the spelling wrong, and of course my address received a notification from TV Licensing. Fortunately, already had a license. But changed rented apartments anyway.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  111. Re:Wait until they discover CRT monitors by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You got a 4K CRT lying around?

    You're so color blind that you can't see the grey film of phosphors on your CRT screen?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  112. Or build your own Open Source antenna. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    He went online and discovered he could buy one for $20 and watch major networks like ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS free.

    Or build your own for even less. Like for $10 if you buy all new parts rather than use stuff that's lying around.

    With the analog-to-digital transition now pretty much done in the US, (and the nominal channel numbers no longer related to the actual frequencies, like portable phone numbers being unrelated to the phone's actual location), essentially all the TV stations are in the UHF band.

    Perhaps the best broadband antenna design for UHF is the "Gray Hoverman", which was open sourced by the patent holder and can be built quite cheaply. Google it and you'll find lots of how-tos. Since you only need UHF you don't even need to do the extra-element tweaks to get VHF signals. Just build the basic double-tripple-u.

    I'm in Silicon valley and all the stations I can get at all here (with one exception) moved to one of three towers. One north of me (in San Francisco), one south (on the hills near Fremont - and a naked-eye object from my yard), and one over a ridge to the north-east. With most of them either north or south I also left out the reflector, so the antenna would be bi-directional. (And the major lobe is broad, so it gets the third tower's signals as well.) Threw it together with a hunk of wood, a few screw, a couple lengths of #14 copper wire from some Romex I pulled in the last remodel, and a balun. Stuffed it behind the TV set and it gets all the stations just fine.

    (With one exception: A legacy analog VHF station in the mountains south of San Jose, run by a church. It's on analog channel 6 so that the audio can also be received by FM tuners - just right for shut-ins who want to attend the services virtually.)

    A nice thing about digital TV is that signals don't get crummy as the strength drops. They are either received correctly or drop out intermittently or completely. So you don't have to have your antenna get really good reception to get really good results on screen. Sticking such an antenna in the attic is just fine - and what I'd have done if the reception in the TV room was weak enough that some stations were flakey or missing.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  113. Re:quality has improved by slew · · Score: 1

    Is an empty Pringles can VHF or UHF?

    Scale is a bit off... You need a bigass pringles can for VHF or UHF.

    Pringles can work pretty good for 5GHz, but UHV is 1GHz and VHF is only 100MHz... (wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, so 1/5 the frequency is 5x the wavelength so you do the math).

    FWIW, the way a cantenna (aka waveguide antenna) works is you need a can with a circumference large enough to let the desired wavelength in (to avoid cutoff, but not too much larger) and long enough to make 3/4 of a standing wave mode so you can tap the standing wave at 1/4 wavelength off the closed end with your antenna tap... If the can is of the right dimensions so that the dominate mode in the can is the frequency that you want to receive, you get lots of antenna gain with this setup.

  114. Lostech by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

    This makes me think of the word "Lostech" that I learned from a game when I was a teen. I have adopted it into my vocabulary and it is amazing how much once state of the art wondrous technology is getting lost to time as it is replaced. Think of the Vacuum Tube that lead to transistors and microchips. They almost seem like magic now (even though I know the basic physics behind them). Or the Cathode Ray Tube that lead to color tube TV's being everywhere at one time and now you can hardly find one as they have all been replaced by LCD's or other flat panels.
    http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Lost...

    --
    Nevermore.
  115. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Not an indoor antenna, but the RCA 751 is only 3 ft long and works great. It can be mounted on a wall, under the eaves of a house. It even comes with the mount, which is identical to the common sat TV mount.

    Hmmm. It's a Yagi; so very directional. Great for range; but I need something a little more omnidirectional...

    And more "indoor" ;-)

  116. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Yes, antenna. Typically, there were two telescoping antennae that would pull up out of the TV's cabinet to form rabbit ears.

  117. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Yes, but even with those, antennae usually came with them. At least, in over 90% of the sets that I saw when I was younger.

  118. My own anecdote by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    I'm not millenial - I grew up with an antenna and we could barely get PBS in a big city (so the first 100 times I saw Monty Python's Holy Grail on Betamax tape there was a lot of interference - it was normal back then)

    But I hadn't used an antenna in about 25 years and didn't believe I could get reception - the websites that purport to tell you if you can and what kind of antenna you should get didn't have a whole lot of data for my area.

    But Amazon tempted me one night after a few beers and I spent $15-20 certain that I'd return it almost as soon as I got it. It claims to have a 50 mile range and I'm about 60 miles outside the metropolitan market. I was surprised - I got 25 "channels". Now granted most of that was religious and home shopping crap but I get Fox and one of two PBS stations and Antenna TV - No ABC, CBS or NBC which I never watched even when I had cable.

    What I've discovered is that there isn't anything on PBS that I couldn't already get on demand online. I've either been asleep or forgot to watch The Simpsons and all the other animated crap on Fox (basically the only reason I watched Fox) and Antenna TV sure has a ton of commercials although it was kind of fun watching old episodes of Hazel and I Dream of Jeannie.

    Just checking now:

    PBS: Some kids show
    FOX: Commercials
    Antenna TV: Commercials

    And this is how it is almost every time I tune in.

    5 years without cable TV and if I happen to be bored, awake, at home and remember to I might watch Bob's Burgers and The Simpsons and whatever else they air for a couple of hours on Sunday but so far that doesn't seem to be very convenient for me. But I could record it, right? Well, I guess I could - somehow, but
    I don't even bother to watch The Simpsons online even though I think I can. I stopped watching even before I dropped cable TV.

    Between Netflix and Amazon I have more than I can ever watch and the list just keeps getting longer. I finally watched Season 1 of The Wire - took me about 10 days because I don't have the time or patience to sit and watch 13 hours of TV in one sitting. That's 15 year old stuff and while I didn't have HBO for most of that time it shows how far behind I am.

    So even for free (minus the one-time cost of a cheap antenna) I'm not really into watching broadcast TV anymore.

    What I found really funny though is that I found myself trying to stop the "stream" before I turned the TV off. But I don't have to do that anymore - it's just always there! In fact I can't do that.

    1. Re:My own anecdote by shoor · · Score: 1

      I get a fair number of stations in my area. I don't spend a lot of time watching TV but there have been some guilty pleasures. I discovered 'Community' by accident that way. Sometimes there's an old movie I want to see, and the quality will be better than on youtube or wherever. I watched "Time of their Lives" on Svengoolie for instance. (Bud Abbott of Abbott and Costello was actually a pretty good actor it seems.)

      Broadcast TV is just another thing that's out there where casual browsing turns up a nice tidbit now and then.

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  119. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are the opposite of cool. It happens almost overnight.

    Indeed. I remember the day it happened to me!

    I am amused by all this millennial hate. The generational wars have always been with us and will always be with us, and they're always stupid.

    As a wise (older and deeply uncool) man once told me: every generation thinks:

    1) That they invented sex
    2) That the generation before them are corrupt idiots
    3) That the generation after them are lazy idiots
    4) That their generation is the last reasonable one before the collapse of civilization

    All of those things are just as true now as they were a thousand years ago. Which is to say, not even a little bit true. But it amuses me to see the tradition carrying on.

  120. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    In that case get a satellite dish. There should be plenty of free to air satellite programming available.

  121. Re:digital channels by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't exactly call it "painless", but probably overall a good thing.

    Yeah, maybe. I suppose it's a good thing that it made it impossible to receive most of the stations anymore without either spending a lot of money on cable or spending a lot of money on roof antennae and boosters. Seriously, in my area (which is urban), those are your only two options unless you happen to live in one of the small areas that can actually get realistic digital reception.

  122. Re:Sarcastic & Condescending by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Err..I have no problems saying anything about any group if it is true.

    Me either. The problem is that almost none of what I hear said about millennials is actually true (or, at least, is no more true of them than any other generation).

  123. This is news? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > an Amazing Hack to Get Free TV

    Yeah, yeah, I've seen the spam. And the infomercials, and the ads in Facebook. All pretending like this is, like, a new and wonderful thing that people have just discovered.

    Someone said it just the other day. I despair for humanity.

    (It so happen, in our area, that most of the local channels originate from a huge cluster of antennas on a nearby mountain top. A farmhouse-grade TV antenna picks up 20+ channels including sidebands. I guess that millennials don't know this shouldn't be surprising.)

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  124. Re:Wait until they discover CRT monitors by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    That used to be true, but is no longer. A high quality LCD beats the pants of of a high quality CRT.

    Also, CRTs absolutely have a native resolution: you can't display any image at a resolution higher than the density of the phosphor dots.

  125. You get what you pay for. by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

    The only thing I've watched that was available OTA in the past year, was off and on a little of the Super Bowl.
    Nothing on the OTA networks interests me.

    There's not much worthwhile for free.

    For a generational reference, I'm over 50. I don't have a land line phone. I have basic cable because it's cheaper to get basic cable and internet, than just internet.

    1. Re:You get what you pay for. by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm in the same demographic, but my reaction is almost the opposite. I dumped cable about five years ago, because I realized that a substantial majority of what I did watch was broadcast for free already. There are a few things I miss (mainly BBC America), but none of them added up to being worth what I was paying for them. Not even close!

      I don't watch a lot of TV in any case, but I'm still watching and enjoying a handful of hours a week, and it's not down much from when I had cable.

      I'd actually have to say that I think the average quality of broadcast TV is higher than the average quality of cable shows. Even if you ignore the craptastic cable channels that nobody watches.

      I have basic cable because it's cheaper to get basic cable and internet, than just internet.

      Well, ok, then. That's a damn good reason to keep cable. If that were true in my case, I'd still have cable as well. But I got fairly substantial savings by dumping cable. Possibly because we still have traces of competition here: I can have any ISP I want as long as they're Comcast or AT&T. :)

    2. Re:You get what you pay for. by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

      I have Comcast. They price it so just internet costs as much as basic and internet.
      I mostly watch Netfilx and HBO. I stream HBO, not part of my cable plan. OTA holds little interest.
      These days internet access is most important. The cable is just a way to get internet.

  126. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    I was having similar issues due to living in suburbs where houses are built 8 - 10 ft apart. I was about to throw in the towel and look for an exterior antenna when I took it off the wall and placed it on the floor (concrete slab foundation). To my amazement I've never had so good reception. It rarely glitches these days.

  127. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by cstacy · · Score: 1

    In the 60s, we connected our TVs to the large antenna outside the house on the roof. In the 70s, TVs started coming with telescoping rabbit ears. (Both the low-end random TVs and the high-end Sony sets had the built-in rabbit ears.)

    I'm not sure who had the separately purchased rabbit ears, which usually were mounted on a little box with a dial control (which maybe varied something electronic in the box and/or physically rotated the antenna). I think it was for when you were in a bad reception area and the normal antenna didn't work (and you were not connecting to the outside antenna).

  128. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    It originally started with the original valve based TV sets. In order to tune your TV into the radio transmitter signal, you had to adjust the very basic radio reception circuit boards which themselves gave off harmonic signals. Due to negative feedback loops, you could end up jamming your neighbors TV set. So "TV licenses" were invented. You got a little card to fill out with your name and address, and if anyone had problems with their TV, the technicians would know where to look. And it was convenient for the authorities to keep track of technology and to keep the BBC on a leash.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  129. question by shentino · · Score: 1

    Is this all digital tv or are there still some analog stations?

  130. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Megane · · Score: 1

    Some USB receivers have mini antennae, but I've never found them to work in any location, not even in the countryside or a downtown hotel.

    I recently read that the reason they don't work well is that they need a ground plane. Notice how they have a really nice magnet? You need to stick that to a big piece of metal, like the roof of a car, for the antenna to work properly. Otherwise you might as well just jam a long piece of wire (like 2m-5m) into the connector and move it around until you get good reception.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  131. Been on Antennas for years! by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    I have been using antennas to get over the air FREE tv for over 12+ years. I NEVER paid for Cable. I get over 14 channels free over the air. In larger cities in my motorhome I can get 20+ channels. All for free! And since they are all digital - the quality is pretty darn good!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  132. Magic? by n329619 · · Score: 1

    Or are people really stupid enough to not know about broadcast fucking TV?

    It's not magic?

  133. Roamio OTA 1 TB has the only cheap AIP by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm talking about these tables. Why is it that the All-In Plan is so much more expensive for every model other than the Roamio OTA 1 TB?

    1. Re:Roamio OTA 1 TB has the only cheap AIP by tepples · · Score: 1

      What cost does TiVo incur by adding cable support compared to not doing so that justifies the huge price difference?

  134. FILM at 11! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    Next up, Millennials will "discover" an amazing hack to reading the news -- buying a printed newspaper from a newspaper stand! More at 11!

    FILM at 11! Used to be that, before videotape camcorders appeared in the early 1980s, the local news was filmed. The news anchors of the 6:PM news would say, "Major car crash at..., film at 11." It would take until 11:PM for the film to be developed, dried, and edited.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  135. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    > All of those things are just as true now as they were a thousand years ago.

    A thousand years? As soon as writing was invented, it was used to complain about how this newfangled writing will ruin everything.

  136. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by William+Baric · · Score: 1

    Gen X'er here. I stopped thinking "being cool" was "cool" when I became an adult. Don't you think it's time for you to also become an adult?

  137. Re: Propaganda by xarragon · · Score: 1

    Not sure if this is true, but people commonly seem to be upset about alleged "free riders" in any situation where they are getting hurt. There sure is a lot of propaganda to this end, no matter what area (piracy, taxes etc).

    From what I have heard (and seen on South Park) about cable operators in the US, they probably got a lot of butt-hurt.
    Soothing the pain with excuses about how they "..would not have to do this to people if it wasn't for those dirty free riders"!

  138. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    That's crazy. So do you pay for radio too? Is there a cool breeze licensing fee for when the wind blows? How about a tanning fee for when the sun shines? Rain fee for when it rains and waters any grass or plants you may own?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  139. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    They probably do it because they know that most purchasers don't actually USE the OTA tuner, but they're required to provide it by law. By requiring a free code, they can get away with only paying royalties to MPEG-LA and/or ATSC for the TVs that have the feature enabled. AFAIK, those royalties aren't cheap, so being able to avoid them for most of the TVs they sell can save the manufacturer quite a bit of money.

  140. Re:Some TV manufacturers disable OTA reception by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    I'm glad I saved my Voom Satellite TV boxes when they went under... I'm now using two of them on secondary TVs in the house. Their ATSC tuners are FANTASTIC.

  141. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Rande · · Score: 1

    They are like HMRC, don't ignore them and they don't bother you (much).
    Just took a phone call to tell them that I didn't own a TV and then every year or so do a declaration online that I still don't have a TV (or in the last one, watch iPlayer).
    They've never shown up to my house in the 10+ years that I've not had a TV license.

  142. No one cares in South Asia... by ashvagan · · Score: 1

    Because TV cable here costs $4.50 with over 150 channels.

  143. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by mikael · · Score: 1

    But it is really hit and miss as to whether it would work or not , depending on whether you were on a high floor of a building as well as on a hill.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  144. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    Correct. The license fee goes to pay for the BBC which is commercial-free.

  145. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    The license fee pays for the BBC programming (though a lot of BBC programming also benefits greatly from selling it to US networks). Shows like Doctor Who are paid for by this, and are broadcast commercial-free. It also goes to fund the BBC news.

    While I don't live in England any more, I appreciate greatly this "socialized" TV. Thanks to this business model, the BBC produces quality commercial free TV and news without a significant political bias... though they do have a slight lean toward the current governmental makeup but it tends to not be extreme except for certain shows.

  146. How to deal w/ multiple bcast antennae locations? by cshay · · Score: 1

    The major networks have antennas located in 3 different locations in my area.

    In order to watch a station, I must first aim the antenna in the direction of the antenna. Then I must do small tweaks because if it isn't exactly right, the signal goes in an out. (and this being digital, we aren't talking about a little snow). And inexplicably the "perfect" location for the antenna seems to vary from one day to the next.

    And of course one station uses VHF (rabbit ears) and the rest use UHF (bow ties), but that's just one more headache I won't get into here.

    Anyone in my situation and did you manage to solve it so that you can use a DVR reliably?

  147. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    At which point you get shows like Top Gear that are basically 90 minute car commercials.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  148. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Lately they seem to have acquired a heavy LGBT bias, that has even invaded Dr. Who. Expect the first female Dr. to have plenty of lesbian scenes.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  149. You'd be surprised . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    My oldest came back from college, years ago, and was giggling over a fellow student who had "discovered" a "Green Clothes Drying Method".

    Better known as a clothesline. . . .

  150. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by greenzrx · · Score: 1

    Do you still need a license to watch ITV, or other independent broadcast channels that DO have commercials?

  151. Semi-Fix [Re:Not lossy-friendly [Re:Full retro]] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Skipped key frames (which causes this, if I am correct) in a video stream can lead to some very bizarre visual effects.

    It probably should switch off incremental rendering if a key frame was not received correctly. Just leave the last good image paused until a good key frame arrives (with regular sound pace, assuming good sound).

    Maybe they should also send a lower-res key frame (LRKF) in case the regular one comes messed up. Don't put the LRKF adjacent to the regular KF because signal gaps tend to bunch together. Maybe put the LRKF about 1/3 the way thru. Example:

    KF // regular key frame #23
    IU // incremental update
    IU
    LRKF // low-res key frame version of #23 at 1/3 of cycle
    IU
    IU
    IU
    IU
    KF // regular key frame #24
    IU
    IU
    LRKF // low-res key frame version of #24
    IU
    etc...

    (IU frequency is only an example and may vary per picture complexity.)

    This way if KF#23 is messed up, the screen pauses until it reaches LRKF#23 as a consolation prize. The chance of both KF#23 and LRKF#23 being messed up is relatively small. If they both are by chance, then the pic just pauses at the last good set (KF#22 + IU's) rather than force render the incremental updates like the current standards seem to.

    A bad KF would then just usually cause a slight pause for 1/3 of a cycle and then use a somewhat blurry key frame (LRKF) image for the other 2/3.

  152. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    After the first year you should've been telling them to fuck off and stop harassing you.

  153. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Get a decent antenna, trying half a dozen crappy antennas isn't going to help get a good signal. A decent long range antenna will cost you upwards of $100. Then put it high enough to have line of sight to your transmission towers and tune appropriately. I was receiving off-axis digital broadcasts from over 70 miles away at the last house, no problems. My current residence is closer, and the antenna is going up this weekend.

    IOW, the digital broadcasts are fine, it's likely your antenna or cabling that's the culprit.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  154. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    I bought a good long-range antennae, just under $100, has mounts for placing it in the attic, and could even go outside if the weather isn't horrible.

    It gave the exact same performance as the plastic square one you tape to the wall. Granted it was in the same general place as that plastic square one, but the performance shouldn't be just as bad, in just the same way, as all the others I tried.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  155. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    First, the first antenna I bought was $130. It didn't work super well but still gave reasonable reception. The clamps and attic mounting stuff was another $30. I then switched to a $80 ($40 on sale) outdoor antenna, but that thing was HUGE (about 7x9 ft square, and 3 ft in height. It still fit in my attic. It captured everything.

    The next obvious question is: do you have clear line of sight (electromagnetically) between your antenna placement and your towers? No radiation shielding in your attic tiles, no power lines or other broadcasting antenna near enough to line of sight or the house itself to cause interference, no water towers, hills, tall buildings, bridges, etc? Because there's no reason a decent antenna shouldn't be able to pull an OTA broadcast signal from 80+ miles away given a clear line of sight.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  156. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Interesting comments in this thread, all began when millennials discovered antennas. Boomer here, old enough to remember aiming the antenna at one station but get ghosts on the others. Was too poor and lazy to install a rotor (which always break down the evening when showing a good movie, and weather terrible and lost the ladder). Nowadays amazed to watch these 60s shows like Batman and all the details I never saw. Still hate when they tilted the camera for the crooks hideout.

    Regarding generations, someone on a forum went on a endless diatribes how millennials are destroying the car industry, housing market, etc by not buying any of these things. I responded (a quote from one of you slashdotters), "Hey Socrates, youth still terrible these days?"

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  157. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

    5) That the whole world is flawed, and needs to be radically transformed

    6) That Conservative ideas are stupid

    7) That their college professors know what they are talking about (later, they discover, those who can't "do", "teach")

    8) That Management is EASY, it's just barking orders at people

    9) That the best strategy is to live hard and die young

    10. That people like Che Guevara are cool! (They are actually murdering sociopaths)

    --
    Murphy was an optimist
  158. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    For the record I have bought a couple of antenna in the last couple of years from Amazon (for someone else, I don't watch over the air tv) but I can't say its made any difference to their 'investigations'.

    I think The Raven was talking about Set-Top Boxes, DVRs, etc. rather than antennae. An antenna isn't capable of receiving and decoding a TV broadcast signal.

    Your approach to the "money with menaces" letters is correct. They do send round doorsteppers - at least in town. And their doorsteppers do not have right of entry. So no matter how foul the weather outside, the correct response is "get off my property and come back with a search warrant" and the police officers to validate and enforce it". The "validate" bit is important - you'll comply with the law, but do not trust the doorsteppers themselves. The "police officers" bit is important - the police do not have the resources to attend (PCSOs are not police officers, BTW). And the "search warrant" bit is important because it would destroy any hope of profit for the doorstepping company from the encounter.

    IME, they send the doorsteppers round on dark and stormy nights, and will appeal to you to "let us in to get out of the weather. Don't - once they're in, they can search and seize. Refuse entry, point-blank, then order them off your property, then shut the door in their faces.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  159. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    So do you pay for radio too?

    The radio reception license was folded into the TV license fee around the mid-1980s, IIRC. You can't purchase a separate radio license any more - I tried in the mid-1990s.

    There is no cool breeze licensing fee or tanning fee, since possession of cool breeze receptors or melanocyte cells were not considered as spying equipment during WW2. (That's why radio receivers were registered devices during the War, extended to add TV in 1948.)

    In the mid-1990s, when the water utilities were sold off for profit, they tried to sue people who installed water butts to collect the rain water from their roofs for use in the garden. They came pretty close to succeeding too, but in his summing up the judge started going down the path that the water utility (Severn-Trent, I think it was) had established it's ownership of all rainfall from the moment it touched a roof or the ground. But the utility company barrister saw the trap that was being primed and withdrew the case with seconds to spare. The trap being that, if the water utility owned the water as soon as it touched the ground, then they were liable for any damage that it caused - such as by running through leaky roofs or drowning people in rivers. But yes, they (the privatised, for-profit) water utilities did try to establish what would have been a "rain fee".

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  160. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Yes. The license is for the possession (not use, possession) of equipment capable of receiving and decoding broadcast TV signals. UHF or VHF, doesn't matter, it''s not specified. Frequency is not specified (and varies from one transmission tower to the next, to reduce interference in overlap areas).

    People tried the "I only use the TV to watch ITV" defence repeatedly in the 1960s and 70s. It has never been accepted, because the legislation was written to cover any equipment regardless of what (if anything) was being broadcast. And the legislation used to cover radio reception equipment too, until the mid-80s when they gave up on that.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  161. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    The first year that I had my own address, but no TV (and therefore, no TV license. Or radio license either.) I got the letter, and returned it stating "I have no TV, but would you send me information about how to get a Radio License" (I knew they'd stopped doing radio licenses). In subsequent years, when I got the letter about "according to our records, you have no TV license..." I wrote back that "your records contain the information I sent you in [first year] which answer your query." Which covers me, but would require them to admit that they don't have a record-keeping system worth pissing on.

    I'd get a visit from the doorsteppers about 1 year in 2.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  162. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Lots of people have dumped $60-120/month satellite subscriptions.

    So high? When I had satellite (3 years ago now), it was £37/mo, so about USD 45/mo?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  163. Re:This is not news, news for nerds, or interestin by prizrak · · Score: 1

    You must be new here...

  164. Free TV? You get what you pay for... by PlaynBass · · Score: 1

    One minute of content, three minutes of advertisements.

    News shows are laughable, being mostly Weather and Traffic reports, with obsequious celebrity gossip and sports fanboy drooling, with very little in the way of useful news reports about important subjects. The constant barrage of stories about killings, traffic accidents, and fires don't really count as news and only serve to keep the populace in a constant state of fear of one's neighbors.

    Many so-called new stories are thinly veiled advertisements for local businesses, masquerading as news. The FCC apparently no longer requires TV and radio stations to air real political debates or to give all candidates access to unpaid time to inform the population of their viewpoints and proposed political policies.

    On the other hand, there is no shortage of paid political attacks on all of the candidates during the nearly full-time campaign cycle.

    Unscripted "reality" shows are now the go-to summertime replacements for what used to be reruns of written dramas.

    Unlike Netflix (which has no advertisements and is well worth the monthly fees, IMO) and the other paid internet services, the paid cable services give you many channels, but most of them provide you with advertisement-laden excuses for actual content for the privilege of paying for their overpriced bundles of boring and unwatchable cat-and-dog videos and home shopping programs.

    Give me a good library any day!

    --
    PlaynBass
  165. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

    Make sure your antenna receives UHF in addition to VHF. Lots of older antennas were VHF-only (channels 2-13).

    Before analog broadcasting ended, we had 2 (analog) UHF stations - 23 and 58 - that we could receive better than the VHF stations.

    I tried adding a UHF booster amp at the top of the mast. It only exacerbated the problems, (We live in one of the northern suburbs of our area. The TV stations are in the southern suburbs. I'm assuming our neighborhood is a victim of the combined RF noise of the intervening city.)

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  166. If its free its for me by theupdown · · Score: 1

    I think I might get my own antenna when I move out. It would mostly be for novelty as I don't really watch cable. There are a few shows I like to watch live so the cost of setup seems worth it.

  167. Re:Free TV? Who knew? by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I haven't been able to get a decent OTA signal since the switchover (if I can get a signal at all). On the other hand, that got me to pretty much stop watching TV, so there's an upside.

    yeah...we basically did the same thing. Digital OTA was such crap that it was quickly dropped. Fully predictable

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  168. Re: Free TV? Who knew? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    "You can't purchase a separate radio license any more - I tried in the mid-1990s."

    Is your name Eric and do you have a cat detector van?