Slashdot Mirror


Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think', Says Microsoft (onmsft.com)

Microsoft said this week that Bing is "bigger than you think" and provided some numbers that could be a surprise to many. The company claims that fully one-third of searches in the US are powered by Bing, either directly or through Yahoo or AOL (both of which provide results generated by Microsoft). From a report: With 9% market share worldwide and 12 billion monthly searches, almost half of that (5 billion) comes from the United States where Bing has 33% market share.

220 comments

  1. Most searched word on Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Google"

    1. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google hidden piracy link in SERP, for piracy search http://yandex.com

    2. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by lastman71 · · Score: 1

      "Google"

      More "Insightful" than "funny" :)

    3. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Firefox"

    4. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Least searched thing on Google: What is Bing?

    5. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by tomxor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You joke... but there are still many people who don't know what a browser is, they go buy a cheap 100$ laptop preloaded with winbloat 10 avengers home business whatever edition it is now, pre-loaded with Edge+Bing by default, they probably end up searching for google in edge's omnibar every single time they want to go to google... Bing counts that as a search of course, not a domain autocorrect. You might even be able to roughly calculate this proportion if Google released their "Google.com via Bing.com" stats you could subtract it from M$ stats.

    6. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by tomxor · · Score: 1

      another one would be "google chrome or firefox installer for windows".

    7. Re: Most searched word on Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cortana naked" ... No?

      Maybe that's just me then...

    8. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoting the Cheeto Jesus: "Bing? Bong. Bing Bing Bong Bong Bing Bong Bing Bong."

  2. And this matters to me... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... how?

    1. Re:And this matters to me... by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

      ... how?

      Viable alternative to google/news, which is teh suck and getting worse.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      What's so horrible about google?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:And this matters to me... by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's controlled by a big corporation, so you should use Bing instead.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a VIABLE alternative then look to DuckDuckGo, not bing... never bing... never, ever bing...
      --
      Steve (AC because I haven't bothered to register in all these years)

    5. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume your mother is going to stop breast feeding you at some point?

    6. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is also a big corporation, and unlike Google is a convicted monopolist.

    7. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I? It tastes AWESOME. I even pick my girlfriends based on whether they're lactating or not. You should try it, you have no idea what you're missing.

    8. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stock being so fucking lazy Steve. If you want to search for something, get off your ass, walk outside, and go find it.

    9. Re:And this matters to me... by rahenri · · Score: 1

      I will just leave this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    10. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Google values censorship.

    11. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      OMG a megacorp likes censorship! Fucking knock me over with a feather.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    12. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dat's da joke"

    13. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feed all my girlfriends Mother's Milk.

    14. Re:And this matters to me... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      ... how?

      They put up a story that isn't about Trump or the Google memo, and you're complaining?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    15. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Keep doing business with megacorps that censors because free speech is an antiquated idea that should be burned. It's not like megacorps are the gatekeepers to the internet or anything.

      "I care more about the label on the boot that's on my neck than the boot itself."... You're a tool.

    16. Re:And this matters to me... by Voyager529 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's so horrible about google?

      1. Their search results have gotten progressively worse of late. it's either so fuzzy as to have half the top results completely irrelevant, or "verbatim" won't come up with anything because of spacing or the literal order of words is incorrect.
      2. Search for "driver download" and you'll get some very shady websites, many of which don't actually provide driver downloads...and they do nothing about it. Same for "teamviewer" and other legitimate tools that get hijacked by "your computer has a virus" websites. If they want to perpetuate the blurring between the URL bar and the search bar, that's fine, but literally nobody has Googled for teamviewer and been okay with the sketchy sites that rank very high.
      3. Overall creepiness. They collect *a lot* of data, even if users go out of their way to avoid it. Though they *say* they'll be responsible with it (and to be fair, so far they appear to have done so), it's incredibly difficult to opt out of data collection, because so much of the web depends on them (go ahead, disable Google Fonts and Google AMP and see what happens to the internet...)
      4. Questionable practices - preferring faster sites is understandable, defining 'faster' as 'using Google AMP' is shady. Ad blockers are one thing, but adding an ad blocker to a browser that has a controlling slice of the market when 90% of their revenue comes from ads is 90's Microsoft levels of monopoly.
      5. E-mail is a great thing. Gmail has twisted it very heavily from being an analog of letter-based correspondence to being a de facto chat client, and twisting POP and IMAP to make it less practical to use a third party mail client, and require an obscurely placed setting to allow third party clients to connect via standard protocols...and it's not getting better.
      6. Discontinuing useful services and changing UIs and APIs to make things less useful (Reader, iGoogle, their 1,001 chat clients, none of which are XMPP compliant anymore, the list goes on).
      7. On Android specifically, mandating profitable things ('Play Store' must be on the first page) but not openness-based things (mandating unlocked bootloaders or that shipped apps can be removed if not a core function). Yes, they sell their reference phones, but if they're going to have requirements that are purely for profit reasons, there's no reason they can't mandate Samsung do the same thing.

      Now yes, I know there are rebuts to most of these items, but collectively Google has a stranglehold on the internet advertising market and controls enough of the internet infrastructure that avoiding them is near impossible, I do expect better behavior out of them.

    17. Re:And this matters to me... by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If you want a VIABLE alternative then look to DuckDuckGo, not bing... never bing... never, ever bing...

      I forced myself to use DuckDuckGo for a month, by the end of the month, I was rerunning most of my searches with the "!g" tag to do the search on Google since DuckDuckGo results weren't what I was looking for.

    18. Re:And this matters to me... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Viable how?

      Google's results have ben in decline for a while, but for anything even slightly non-trivial Bing rarely even gives more than one or two results in the first page that are actually relevant. Every time I use them it's like returning to the bad old days when Alta Vista and Ask Jeeves. (I do computer repair, so end up doing a lot of searches on other people's computers with the default engine)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    19. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Keep doing business with megacorps that censors because free speech is an antiquated idea that should be burned. It's not like megacorps are the gatekeepers to the internet or anything.

      Hey, I'm a leftie, screaming my lungs out about corporate power, regulatory capture and monopolies is my bread and butter. So I'm hazing you for being late to the party you precious little snowflake.

      "I care more about the label on the boot that's on my neck than the boot itself."... You're a tool.

      Nice strawman. Now go vote for some communists who'll actually try to break apart the googles of this world, cuz the GOP sure as shit isn't going to bother.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    20. Re:And this matters to me... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      ... how?

      Viable alternative to google/news, which is teh suck and getting worse.

      Oh, some googley googler had mod points today, and hanging on Slashdot instead of working, mercy me. Look... the rot that is eating Google out from the outside... you are part of it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    21. Re:And this matters to me... by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      What's so horrible about google?

      I said google news, not "google". Google is another issue. Figure out what's horrible about Google for yourself. I well help you with google news: it sucks, the format is crap, the concept is crap, the news search is crap, it gets worse with each revision... what the fuck. What are they thinking.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    22. Re:And this matters to me... by KingMotley · · Score: 2

      Well, except google is also a convicted monopolist.

    23. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 2

      I'm hazing you for being late to the party

      You don't know any position I have or held particularly so on this topic. Why are you generalizing and treating me as a group instead of an individual?

      ow go vote for some communists

      why would anyone be a communist with such a body count? I also think that I own my labor and can sell it at my discretion and economic transactions are not inherently evil.

      You know. Never mind. I don't want to have a conversation with an ideologue that treats an individual as a group through generalizations and ideological purity tests. You are why we can't have nice things.

    24. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      You don't know any position I have or held particularly so on this topic.

      You do know your entire commenting history is available at the click of a button, right?

      Having said that, I apologize. I didn't realize you were an ardent anti-monopolist. We'll get those megacorps eventually, comrade!

      You are why we can't have nice things.

      Jebus! Go find your safes space already.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    25. Re:And this matters to me... by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      https://www.ftc.gov/news-event...

      https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/05/ftc-fines-google-19-million-for-kids-app-misuse
      And that's not all of it.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    26. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      and i am sure you read that commenting history, right?

      u r my safe space.

      only thing better than a dead commie is a dying commie telling me where more commies are.

    27. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... how?

      More and more women claim that it's actually 12 inches? (about 30 cm)

    28. Re:And this matters to me... by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      What's so horrible about google?

      The quality of Google's search results has fallen fairly dramatically over the past few years, to the point where it's no longer superior to engines like Bing.

      Google News recently made changes that has eliminated its usefulness for a lot of people. Bing News has become a better alternative for many of those people.

    29. Re:And this matters to me... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      As is Microsoft.

    30. Re:And this matters to me... by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's very strange. One of the pleasant surprises I had when I start using DDG was that the search results I got tended to be much better than what I was getting out of Google.

      Neither are perfect, of course.

    31. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not illegal to be a monopoly. It is only illegal if you get judged abusing your monopoly. And face facts MS gained it's monopoly position because no one with the possible exception of Apple tried to compete with MS. Most of those who could compete sold out. All of the most widely used software applications that ran on MS-DOS were from other companies. The developers of products such as WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2-3,and Dbase either sold their technology to MS or dithered porting their popular DOS applications onto the Windows platform which gave MS the time to catch up in the application space. Netscape had a 90% market share because they ended up developing a gigantic piece of shit that made even IE look good. Hell MS had to invest money in Apple to keep them in business so MS could point to them as an example of a MS competitor in the court cases.

    32. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      and i am sure you read that commenting history, right?

      The only interesting thing to read on the internet is comment threads, so pretty much, yeah.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    33. Re:And this matters to me... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      When you have the dominant engine, everyone out there will be trying to subvert your engine to get their (usually spam) pages to show up first... Exactly the same thing happened to altavista.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    34. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they? No doubt they are a monopolist, but I hadn't realized they'd been sued for it yet.

    35. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      only interesting thing to read on the internet is comment threads

      clearly you have never read the Linux manual. sig be damned.

    36. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Nah, I've read it. It was a while ago, though. So I've moved on. Living in the past is for suckers.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    37. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      10/10 would read ur comment again.

    38. Re:And this matters to me... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ..and it all runs on Intel, another convicted monopolist.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    39. Re:And this matters to me... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      As is Google.

      I see a pattern forming here.

    40. Re: And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters because the EU declated Google a monopoly and hit them with a massive fine. If MS is correct that Bing has 1/3rd of the search market then it proves the EU made a purely political decision and Google will probably win their appeal.

    41. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go take your pills already

    42. Re: And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you people retarded or something? There's no such thing as a "convicted monopolist". It's not a crime anywhere to be a monopoly.

    43. Re: And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you weren't alive in the 90s. Netscape and IE were basically the same shit. Netscape actually had a slight edge on market share until Microsoft bundled IE with windows 98. Everybody was on crappy dialup at the time, so they just stuck with the browser that they didn't have to download.

    44. Re:And this matters to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll add another vote for the usability of DuckDuckGo. There may still be times when I am desperate for a result and will check the Goog too, but I am usually happy to go through DDG's results for what I want.

    45. Re:And this matters to me... by dhammabum · · Score: 1

      doesn't duckduckgo use bing as its backend search engine?

      --
      I am not a robot. I am a unicorn.
    46. Re:And this matters to me... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      or "verbatim" won't come up with anything because of spacing or the literal order of words is incorrect.

      It's amazing that verbatim doesn't show up when you get the word order wrong...

      Search for "driver download" and you'll get some very shady websites, many of which don't actually provide driver downloads

      Yep, as link like 5+ after the vendor's website at the top.

      Same for "teamviewer"

      Just tried it and got:
      1. TeamViewer's website.
      2. TeamViewer on the google play store.
      3. TeamViewer on cnet's download.
      4. TeamViewer on Filehippo's download.
      5. TeamViewer's wikipedia entry
      6. TeamViewer on the iTunes store
      7. TeamViewer on the Windows store.
      and the next button.
      Literally the entire page was nothing but links to the official teamviewer download locations.

      And the rest of your post is just personal opinion.

  3. If Bing was really that good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Microsoft wouldn't have to bribe people to use it. (See: Bing Rewards)

    1. Re:If Bing was really that good... by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      If Google was really that good they wouldn't have to Bribe Apple and Mozilla to embed it into their products?

    2. Re: If Bing was really that good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad analogy. If I'm gonna pick a search engine to use personally i will pick the most effective one. Apple and Mozilla don't care as much which is best as which pays them the most. That's why Firefox switched to Yahoo because they offered them more despite the huge outcry from its user base.

  4. Umm, yeah, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running a search on Bing every damn time someone hits an MS web page doesn't count...

    1. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That and many browsers will have its default search engine as Bing or Yahoo. And still they are #2 behind Google.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by green1 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Google is the default search on chrome, and that includes many smartphones (which are a very popular device to run searches on these days)

    3. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      That's not really fair, because GOOGLE MAKES CHROME. Also, GOOGLE MAKES ANDROID.

      Firefox changed it's default search from Google to Yahoo (which uses bing). It's troublesome to change the default to Google, but it's worth it. While you're at it, DELETE bing and yahoo from the list because some updates will change your default to them for you.

    4. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by green1 · · Score: 1

      But Google does NOT make iPhone, yet the default search there is Google (for lots of $$ it's been revealed) so that's no different than Firefox (I doubt Firefox made the change for free)

      Thing is, there's always a default, maybe there shouldn't be, maybe on first boot you should have to chose, but as long as search engines pay mega-bucks to be the default, there will always be a default, and it's not unique to MS.

      The one that is however less fair is when MS releases a "critical update" that reverts your search engine to Bing after you've manually changed it. That's pretty underhanded.

    5. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying they're #2 doesn't show a clear picture though. They're 75% behind google, and only 1 or 2% ahead of baidu and yahoo. they're *barely* #2. Without them being browser default for the most popular OS, they'd easily be #5.

    6. Re: Umm, yeah, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not troublesome. It's right there in the settings menu.

      And fuck firefox, they've broken more shit I need with their latest update, forcing me over to Chrome just to get my job done. Despite being loyal for as long as they've been around, I finally uninstalled it today.

  5. It's the name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have chosen something intuitive or descriptive like Google.

    1. Re:It's the name by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it doesn't make any sense. Why would they name a service that you use to Google things "Bing"?

    2. Re:It's the name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the real Bing.

    3. Re:It's the name by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Bing
      Is
      Not
      Google.

      I rest my case.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:It's the name by omnichad · · Score: 1
  6. Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bing is the best porn search engine out there.

    1. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with pornhub?

  7. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After they weaseled Win10 onto everyone and set it as the default search engine, does this really come as a surprise?

    1. Re:Duh by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      It's actually the same 10% as the rest of the world. They've padded the stats out with bot traffic.

  8. Not according to my access logs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traffic from Google is 28x all other search engines combined.

    1. Re:Not according to my access logs by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Accordingly to my access logs, bingbot is extremely aggressive compared to other search engine bots... It seems to request the same files repeatedly, over and over... At one point my server was pushing a steady 20mbit/sec of traffic to bingbot.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  9. Bing is a Me too product. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I haven't found any real advantage of Bing over Google other than some cosmetic stuff. I remember Microsoft Adds a while back showing that without the cosmetic differences Bing and Google were not differential. Which pretty much failed. Because if you are already using one product why would you change over to an other product that does the same thing?

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Bing is a Me too product. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe you feel like someone else should be spying on you for a change.

      This brings an interesting question though: would you rather have one search engine know almost everything about you or would you rather have multiple search engines know a lot but nowhere near everything about you?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Bing is a Me too product. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Bing maps is wqy faster than Google maps.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    3. Re:Bing is a Me too product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing maps is wqy faster than Google maps.

      Which is impressive given that their maps appear to be from before the invention of computers.

  10. Bing VIDEO is really good by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Informative

    search Bing for whatever porn you want, let's say tentacle henai, then click on the "Video" tab. It will pull up lots of videos of tentacle hentai. Also you can watch these videos from Bing search results without going to the video's originating website (which can be very sketchy and full of malware)

    1. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by saider · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure Microsoft will talk about this use case in their next commercial.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe something like, "Bing, there's a fetish for that."

    3. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "search Bing for whatever porn you want"
      as long as you sign in to turn off the family filter, then they can tie your deviant searches/fetishes to your PI.

      nice fetish you have, shame if your employer/spouse/kids were to see it.

    4. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as the president said, "bing bing bing." Words we can all live by.

    5. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it's the office workers in dinosaur masks watching tentacle porn at work, cuz that's totally my thing.

    6. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      You do not need to sign in to change the filter setting. You can do it without a Bing account. You can even do it from your browser's "Private Window".

    7. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      "Hay Siri, show me some tentacle porn videos."

      "Alexa, order more man-size kleenex and a mop."

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      This very neatly ties into that awful video where they had projectile vomiting on viewing someone's search history. I was just too blind to see how having retching and heaving and a floor full of puke was really the perfect way to speak technically

    9. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by MatiasKiviniemi · · Score: 1

      HAHaHAaa! Finally "News for nerds, Stuff that matters"! :D

    10. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by tomxor · · Score: 1

      search Bing for whatever porn you want, let's say tentacle henai, then click on the "Video" tab. It will pull up lots of videos of tentacle hentai.

      I really really hope Microsoft capitalise on this very insightful post and make a Bing tentical hentai tv commercial.

    11. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing really is a better search engine for porn than Google is.

      Google doesn't let you turn Safe Search all the way off any more, it hasn't in years.

  11. Fake news by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    This is just more fake news from Microsoft. Most people don't care what search engine they use and probably have no idea how to change the default anyway, so they use whatever is there so long as they find what they want. If you snuck into their houses and changed it to Google they not only wouldn't care, they probably wouldn't even notice. In fact it would be hilarious if some black-hat (or white-hat for that matter) created malware that changed everyones default search engine to anything but Bing.

    1. Re:Fake news by ghoul · · Score: 0

      Somebody already created a malware that changes everyone's default search Engine to Google. In fact they created 2 - iOS and Android. Witness the dumbing down of an AMerica addicted to "smart" phones - smart because between the phone and the person using it we know only one is smart.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an interesting idea, create a program that looks like anyone's default search engine, but is your own search engine. Kind of like a VPN Search Engine?

    3. Re:Fake news by tsqr · · Score: 1

      This is just more fake news from Microsoft.

      I'm tired of the term "fake news". Can't we just go back to calling it "bullshit" like we did in the good old days?

    4. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. That term triggers all the Bull Dykes and Bull Queers.

    5. Re:Fake news by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I'm using the term ironically. If it pisses off the Trump fuccbois because I'm using it wrong then that's bonus points.

  12. Yeah by EnsilZah · · Score: 0

    The just got back from swimming in the pool, and the water was cold...

  13. What is this Bing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to google it but no luck.

    1. Re:What is this Bing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A carburetor.

    2. Re:What is this Bing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a nerds bong. Replaced the "o" with an "i" because... Oh wait, that's Apple.

  14. hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Using your monopoly power to force Windows 10 users to perform any Contana search request through Bing sure helps... but of course Google isn't much better.

    1. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also windows 10 S users are forced into using Edge and Bing

  15. Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't care how big Google or Bing is. Search is a commodity now. I don't really care which farm grew my morning grapefruit either.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Commoditization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL: There are location and behavior trackers in my morning grapefruit.

    2. Re:Commoditization by SnarkSide · · Score: 1

      Even if one company's grapefruit isn't much different than the other, I just like to know that if the first company gets a little to adamant about always wanting to watch me eat my grapefruit, I can go to another company. I support Bing for one and only one reason, so Google will have competition. I block my computers from talking to Google entirely whenever possible. Microsoft may not get privacy right either, but the world is a better place if Google at least has competition who can at least claim to respect privacy more. I can't depend only on Startpage and Duckduckgo because they won't be able to really offer competition to Google for various reasons. Even if company B watches me eat my grapefruit, I'd rather they exist just to discourage company A from watching me eat my grapefruit in 4K video that they store for 10 years.

    3. Re:Commoditization by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I don't really care which farm grew my morning grapefruit either.

      I don't know about that. Locally grown and in season produce is vastly superior.

    4. Re:Commoditization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really care which farm grew my morning grapefruit either.

      I don't know about that. Locally grown and in season produce is vastly superior.

      No such thing. They could not compete with globalization and weren't able to deliver consistent quality all through the year. Nobody wants to change suppliers and products every few months.

    5. Re:Commoditization by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "no such thing"? My pantry disagrees.

    6. Re:Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Locally grown and in season produce is vastly superior.

      So you live in Texas, Florida or remember when California had good grapefruits. And if I lived in Hawaii I'd probably go for Tahitian Pommelmousse instead, because I could grow it my yard instead of having going to the store.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Commoditization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you slashdot community. How the fuck does this idiot have a score of 4?

      "I don't care... just needed to share that" -- fucking retarded

    8. Re:Commoditization by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      So you live in Texas, Florida or remember when California had good grapefruits.

      Actually, none of the above. But I do live within an hour's drive of farms and there are always plenty of farmer's markets in the city that sell whatever is currently in season in my area.

    9. Re:Commoditization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As does my apple tree.

    10. Re:Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      And they have grapefruits? Are you certain the farmers markets aren't selling fruit that they bought from the co-ops?

      It's an hour's drive to get local garlic and it's cheap, often free, but it's not worth the drive to me.

      And some things aren't worth getting locally. I once drank wine from Michigan. never again.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    11. Re:Commoditization by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Would you care if grapefruit company A uses the money they get from their grapefruits to find a way to make sure you can't work anymore, or buy grapefruit B that will allow you to keep your job, property, life?

    12. Re:Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that would be very important to me, if I were a SJW or I were part of a grapefruit picking union.

      But what you propose is the opposite of a commodity. If you want to get more than the common market price for your goods, you need to differentiate. So you do them as "organic" and imply they have some additional health benefits or improved taste. Or "free-tree" and hope that consumers are concerned that small farmers are being treated fairly by large multinational export corporations.

      There are lots of different ways you make money through appeals to emotion.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    13. Re:Commoditization by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. The thought I was trying to convey wasn't captured in your comprehension. I'm sure it's my fault.

      What I was trying to say is would you care if a commodity company - call it company A uses the proceeds from your purchase to put you out of work or perhaps even kill you, or would you buy commodity from Company B that isn't trying to kill you? I wanted to bring that thought out because that is what is going on in the world today. Some companies that are household names are backed by some truly evil people. For instance, Mr. George Soros. Look him up, on youtube with his 2020 interview. He'll tell you himself that some of the best years of his life was when he was a Nazi. He has done some good things, it seems. He has also done some downright despicable, terrible things. Things that if those countries were to get a hold of him, well I wouldn't want to be him. His defense was - well don't let a guy like me do things like that. He's right, it was legal. Clearly not moral and he admitted it.

    14. Re:Commoditization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you need a grapefruit? I mean really? For what? Sugar? Any fruit has that. Vitamin C? Bell peppers are better for that. If you're eating five servings of local fruits and veggies a day, I would be absolutely flabberghasted if an additional grapefruit brought you any health benefits.

      Or is this just, "I want it, and therefore I don't care where it comes from or what impacts it has"? If so, that's your choice, but be honest with yourself. A lot of things not worth getting locally aren't worth getting.

  16. I made a lot of money off Bing. Still do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since BIng came out, I signed up for the money rewards back in the day. I probably received over 500 bucks over a few months of use. Microsoft sent me a couple of checks probably totaling around $500. Although Microsoft quit the $$ rewards years ago, I have gotten close to another $500 - $600 in gift cards. I have close to 30k points now I need to redeem. (Amazon money)

    Plus it's not all that bad.

  17. So True by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect many non-porn Bing searches are variations on "How do I set Google as my default search?"

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re: So True by qortra · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would have thought the same thing. However, I've been using Bing since the James Damore incident out of curiosity, and it really isn't that bad. I haven't had to do as many technical (i.e. programming) searches since I switched, and that was always Bing's weakness compared to Google, so I reserve full judgement for later. Regardless of what you feel ethically about Google vs Microsoft, it can't be good for any particular search engine to have a near Monopoly in the US.

    2. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      But with a monopoly it's so much easier for the gov'ment because they only have to "convince" one company to give them access to all their data, instead of having to hassle a bunch of dopey little companies to do so. 'cause terism!

    3. Re:So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and/or searched via the cortana agent....

    4. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by "terism" they mean diversity of opinion.

    5. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice how bad Bing is.

      I can't change my default search engine at work, so Bing has *so many chances* to get it right.

      It consistently does terribly. I know exactly what I'm looking for, write exactly what I want, and Bing drops the ball. I head to Google and it's the first link.

      33% market share speaks to monopolistic business practices, not quality.

    6. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like it can't be good for a particular OS to have a near monopoly on the desktop.

      I use duckduckgo (which Bing also powers) sometimes and it sucks. It's almost a waste of time searching for anything. You end up back at Google and actually being able to find what you want. If it works for you great, doesn't work for me.

    7. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing pretty much only works stateside. Look at bing's marketshare in Europe and elsewhere.

      By the way, the word bing also refers to a solitary confinement prison cell.

    8. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bing does not power DuckDuckGo. Sayeth the 'pedia:

      DuckDuckGo's results are a compilation of "over 400" sources

      Bing is, at most, one component.

    9. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right? Google really is not that good anymore. I just bought a car. Ford fiesta shows like 8/10 no mention of crippling transmission issues, just seo optimized articles promoting paid content

  18. I Switched to Bing by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been proudly using Bing every since Google trampled on Free Speech and fired James Damore.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    1. Re:I Switched to Bing by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      I switched from Chrome to Brave for the same reason. Very happy with the Brave browser. I use DuckDuckGo but it's not as good as Google.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:I Switched to Bing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's a bit extreme... Maybe protest by setting yourself on fire or something, but using Bing?!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:I Switched to Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been proudly using Bing every since Google trampled on Free Speech and fired James Damore.

      So... you take an action to support Microsoft?

      Do I need to list the many, many things that corporation has inflicted on the IT world that have actual, real world consequences that we have been suffering since before slashdot even existed?? Oh my god, Microsoft has been inflicting shit on us since before The Simpsons was a thing.

      Yes, I know, you think the Damore situation is terrible and all that, but deciding that you're going to support Microsoft has a certain pettiness to it. A lack of thought. An ignorance of history.

      By all means, try to justify what you said there. Don't accidentally form a black hole with the density of your reasoning.

    4. Re:I Switched to Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You switched to Microsoft because Google is destroying free speech? The company who invented Embrace, Extend and Extinguish? That have been found guilty in multiple countries of abusing their market position? That's what you did?

      HAHAHAHAHHAHAHhasdkjhashahAHAHAHahahahha HAHAHAH AHA HAHA HAHa ha HA jkhsadaekfjhewgshahAHahahah hah ahs dHAH AHHA AHAHAH AH HAAHAHAHHAHAhahahahahahahahdjkASHDKJASDHKSADHJsahkjahkdsjAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!1111

    5. Re:I Switched to Bing by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      "9 out of 10 Nazis prefer Bing to Google!"

    6. Re:I Switched to Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of DuckDuckGo's results used to be provided through the Bing API. Not sure if that's still the case though.

  19. Clearly BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know anyone who uses Bing deliberately.

    1. Re:Clearly BS by green1 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be deliberate for MS to count it as a win.

    2. Re:Clearly BS by used2win32 · · Score: 1

      I use it deliberately - when Siri searches something for me. That is the only time.
      Apple is paid billions by Google to keep it the default search engine in the iOS system, yet when Siri searches for you it uses Bing.

      --
      Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
  20. Bing API is good by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 2

    You would think that Google would own search via API, but actually Google's APIs for searching the whole web are surprisingly shitty. Bing's on the other hand perform just as well, require no configuration, and are far less expensive.

  21. MS AI Sexbot eating its own dog food by number6x · · Score: 1, Funny

    About 40% are how to switch to Google as default.

    60% are from Microsoft's AI, Tay trying to search how to meet sexy alt-right single men.

    Tay keeps re-submitting because bing thinks she wants to buy packs of American Singles. White cheese, of course!

    1. Re: MS AI Sexbot eating its own dog food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the one thing bing is good for besides finding google instructions, is open! I get way better results.

  22. 9% market share by kfh227 · · Score: 1

    Nope, that is actually right around what I would have guessed.

    The only time I use Bing is when Firefox screws up and somehow changes the default from Google to Bing. Now someone tell me why this keeps happening so I can fix it and get that 9% down to 8.9% for the rest of world.

    1. Re:9% market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it interesting that they are 33% in US though. I wonder if they broke the numbers down further, would they find that 70% of their US traffic comes from indexing bots in a server farm just outside Seattle, WA?

  23. Default by superdave80 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ..." that fully one-third of searches in the US are powered by Bing, ..." Only because there are so many browsers that MS has managed to get Bing setup as the default search engine. The worst was my Thunderbird email client. Not only did it have Bing set as the default search engine, but MS had somehow made it so that Google was not on the list of selectable search engines if you wanted to change from Bing. You actually have to install an add-on to get Google as a search option. I wonder how much they 'donated' to Thunderbird for that one.

    1. Re:Default by green1 · · Score: 2

      The bigger question is why an email client would have a web search function at all. Do you also use your word processor for making spreadsheets and your graphics package for making databases?

    2. Re:Default by alexo · · Score: 1

      Only because there are so many browsers that MS has managed to get Bing setup as the default search engine

      But the fact that Google comes as the default search on Chrome (with over 50% market share), as well as every Android and iOS, does not faze you in the least.

    3. Re:Default by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Siri uses Bing to answer queries, that's probably a fair proportion of those searches.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that Bing has the best porn search, grandpa.

    5. Re:Default by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      The bigger question is why an email client would have a web search function at all.

      If you select something in an email, there is an option to search that highlighted text. It then opens up your default browser and runs that search. It's just a shortcut so that you don't have to copy -> open web browser -> go to search engine -> paste/enter.

    6. Re:Default by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Google was widely used before Chrome/Android/iOS phones. And you generally have to download Chrome (rather than the already installed MS Explorer/Edge) on your PC. So, yeah, there is a really good reason it doesn't phase me in the least.

  24. Sure by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think', Says Microsoft"

    Alas nobody else says this.

    1. Re:Sure by green1 · · Score: 1

      Don't people always say that it isn't the size that counts?

    2. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't people always say that it isn't the size that counts?

      Depends on if we're talking about size of the userbase or size of body parts such as hands or brains, in which case size doesn't matter apparently.

    3. Re:Sure by Threni · · Score: 1

      I would have guessed more than 9% too! I think that figure will surprise people but not for the reasons Microsoft were probably hoping.

    4. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My search engine, it's really big. People say that it is the best search engine out there. In fact, it is the biggest and the best. We have a wall that surrounds our data centre where we hold all the searches.
      (oh and my hands are not small).

    5. Re:Sure by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      They also say is easier to hit a home run with a large bat then a small one.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    6. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "bigger than you think" is a very low bar to get over.

  25. It's amazing what you can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you design your operating system to force people to use your search engine. If you want to use cortana, you have to use bing.

    1. Re:It's amazing what you can do by green1 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, try using Google Assistant without using Google Search.

  26. Damore memo by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    After Google's stupidly-botched and poorly-justified handling of the Damore memo incident, I'm giving Bing more of my search traffic, along with DuckDuckGo. It's clear that viable alternatives have to be kept alive so that when we disagree with a giant's policies we have elsewhere to take our business.

  27. Really, Microsoft? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, after all these years, Bing remains so irrelevant that you have to resort to proclaiming that it is not irrelevant?

    1. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention many people do not know using bing, since it's masquareaded as yahoo and AOL searches.

    2. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be irrelevant, but it's not as irrelevant as you think.

      Disclosure: this post was sponsored by Microsoft, because I'm desperate enough for money to shill, but not desperate enough to get paid for using Bing.

    3. Re:Really, Microsoft? by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's actually super relevant. A lot of people use it, i get ribbed for using it all the time but have no problems using it as my default search engine in the USA. I hear it can suck in foreign countries, but that's not a problem for me.

      Lots of people enjoy bing.. great image search, great SERP design for common topics and they're continuously improving it. They have public conferences once a month where there are thousands of people on the phone hearing about new features and testing new services. It's huge, but written off by so many for reason i fail to understand. (again, unless you don't use US searches.. i can't speak for anywhere else)

      Millions of people use it for bing rewards too.. its nice getting free music, games, xbox live points et all just for doing what you would normally do anyway.

    4. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah man, it's a much BIGGER failure than you think! Even MS just claimed that!

    5. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only issue with Bing is the same mine with Google: privacy. Other than that, Bing is a fine search engine.
      I usually use duckduckgo or startpage (aka. ixquick) which meet my needs 99% of the time.
      Bing rewards has the same smell as brick-and-mortar loyalty cards: customer tracking.

    6. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what I use instead of Google. Either directly or via Duck Duck Go. Google is the one who is irrelevant to me, I don't use a single one of their products any more after they bought doubleclick.net and went to the Dark Side.

    7. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much does Microsoft pay you anyways?

    8. Re:Really, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be a lot. Think of the hours wasted trying to find something that you know the exact name of.

  28. I hope this is true (too many fish in one pot) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this is true, too many fish in one pot (read: Google; obviously) is bad joojoo.

  29. Bing is worse than you think. by urbanriot · · Score: 1

    Seriously, do Microsoft employees actually use Bing? Back in the day when we had HotBot, WebCrawler, Yahoo, etc., etc., they would all produce independently useful and alternative results. These days, for better or for worse, the only tangible results seem to come from Google. I'm sure there's alternatives but Microsoft is not one of them.

  30. I like Bing by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    He had a real self-effacing humor which played off well against Frank Sinatra's brash cockiness.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  31. Forced to use Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in China for one month. Bing is sh...t. Baidu also.
    I have a VPN, but Baidu and some services (Wechat) sometimes refuse to answer a known VPN IP making chinese services and Google mutually exclusive.

  32. one for your chart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Bing. Put that in your chart and plot it.

  33. Bigger Than You Think by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    This is also what I always say before getting kicked out of the bed :(

  34. Wtf? No it's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not reflected in reality

    On the other hand I'm surprised Yahoo is still close to Bing usage....

  35. Again MS is only looking at the US by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    If they aren't prepared to handle the global market they will remain strong. They keep launching products with US centric features and relevance and are extremely slow to grow support in other countries and cultures.

  36. This must be a threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw nuklear war with NK this is.truley frigthning

  37. How many are from Siri type mobile search requests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhone uses Bing when Siri is searching for something for you. What percentage of the total Bing searches are simply mobile users asking where the nearest restaurant/store/whatever is or when the next movie is, or...

  38. Not surprised by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 2

    Microsoft will literally pay you to use Bing. They'll give about a third of a cent per search in rewards. And I still don't use it.

    Bing is the default in a lot of corporate systems. It's like that where I work, and we can't even change the bookmarks.

    But I think the big thing is simply that it's the default to Siri.

    1. Re:Not surprised by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I "use" bing for the pay. I open up another browser, mash the keyboard, and click all the related searches on the side and bottom to open them in new tabs. Takes less than a minute to generate dozens of bing searches. Of course I don't actually look at any of them background tabs of random searches, I just close them. Microsoft gets to falsify their usage numbers, I get gift cards.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  39. It's a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bing is 'Binger Than You Think' "
    FTFY

  40. In fairness, by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    It would be physically impossible for Bing to be smaller than I think it is.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  41. Microsoft is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft pays billions to get people to use bing unitenntially and thinks Bing is big. Haha. Microsoft = North Korea

  42. Duck Duck Go by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    DDG uses Bing as one of its primary search engines. Just an interesting factoid.

    1. Re:Duck Duck Go by used2win32 · · Score: 1

      As one of over 400 sources, yes.

      --
      Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
  43. Ethical reasons by The+Swan+Spirit · · Score: 1

    I would never search in Bing, not because I might think they can't provide the service, which they can, but for ethical reasons.

  44. It's not the size that matters... by Matheus · · Score: 1

    It's how you use it.

  45. Such a shame then by kilodelta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because I block Bing on my firewall as I discovered Microsoft was using it for the Windows 10 phone home. Just block 65.52.108.210, 204.79.197.200 and 13.107.21.200 - buh bye Bing! And it's funny my firewall logs - it's all hits to those IP's. So I know I blocked the right ones. So far nobody on this network has complained and there are about 8 of us using it. And not a single Windows mobile device either.

  46. Let's hear it for Bing! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1
    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  47. Google Chrome by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    Nothing about how Google has pushed Chrome through dubious means to be the #1 browser, which, by default, uses Google for searching.

    They both are playing fast and loose.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Google Chrome by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      What about how Microsoft supplies Internet Explorer/Edge as the default browser on almost every new computer and that has Bing as the default for searching?

      The only time I use it is to do a search for "Chrome" which brings up a massive half page ad about how IE is better

    2. Re:Google Chrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the difference between what happens when you search for the 3 major browsers on bing and Google is really indicative of the difference between the 2.

      Google goes "Oh, firefox? Here. Edge? Here."

      Microsoft goes "Oh, firefox? Use Edge! Chrome? Use Edge!"

      I can see how Google is the bad guy here.

  48. It's not the meat it's the muscle. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    Let me guess, it's not the size but how you use the search?

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  49. bing hidden piracy link in SERP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google Search hidden piracy link, use for pirate yandex.com

  50. Rewards by stinkyj · · Score: 1

    I use it for their reward system, I earn like $5 from amazon, or can use it to earn credits in their Microsoft store for games/videos.

    Good enough search results for me. I'll still use google occasionally, but getting $5 amazon e-credit takes little, to no effort.

  51. Heh... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bing comes as a default search engine (as does Edge), it's obligatory to use in Windows 10S, and Microsoft offers freebies for people who use it (a big reason why the percentage is so big in the US - Bing rewards is not available in several countries).
    Sure, some people use and like it, but I'd say 9% worldwide is a huge failure when you are trying to sway the market with agressive strategies like those.

  52. Default is powerrful by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    Microsoft owns the default, and fools leave it alone.

    Me, I prefer privacy: Duck Duck Go.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  53. Great Accomplishment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've cornered the market on people too stupid or lazy to change their default search. If bing wasn't the IE/Edge default I'm willing to bet you'd have 0% market share.

  54. Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think' by AdamStarks · · Score: 2

    That wouldn't be hard

    (stolen from coworker)

    1. Re:Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think' by vandamme · · Score: 1

      That's what she said.

  55. Verging on Antitrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all they had to do was to abuse their market position with Windows to force all OS searches to execute through both its browser and its search engine. Making your users install a 3rd-party browser extension just to hack their operating system and use their preferred search engine are not the moves of a good business.

  56. Re:Not enough to see a giant dick on their homepag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody made a thing out of that?

    Jeez, I can barely see it even in the zoomed-in picture.

  57. Yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What counts is bing is exactly as shitty as i think.

    And don't even get me started on microsoft...

  58. Competition by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    I use Bing because it makes competition in the market place. For advanced searches I still use Google, but that's just because my google-fu is better.

  59. I am ok with Bing really being big by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    As long as it does not become "too big to fail"

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  60. Porn by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Bing is better than google at finding Porn.

    It has a better video view interface too.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  61. Google's loss is Bing's gain by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    Since Google has changed it's policy from "do no evil" to "do the right (alt-left) thing", the purging of James Damore for a well written, thoughtful document that challenged the alt-left ethos https://medium.com/@Cernovich/... was the last straw for me. I have switched away from Google as my default search engine, removed the Chrome browser from my PC and directed all meaningful email away from my Gmail account. I have also switched from ABP to a pi-hole to deny all ad revenue to the leaches.

    Google used to be a great tech company, but it is clear that they are no longer interested in science or the truth if it contradicts their worldview and are only secondarily interested in innovation. For a company through which the vast majority of the information in the world is filtered, that is a very bad thing. They are no longer interested in the most accurate results, they are interested in the right results, whatever they might determine that might be. They were already caught interfering with the autocomplete suggestions when searching for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 elections. I suspect that they will continue to dramatically lose market share until they get a CEO who cleans house of all the SJW types in positions of power and gets back to focusing on the core technology.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  62. Porn is a perfectly reasonable explaination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company claims that fully one-third of searches in the US are powered by Bing, either directly or through Yahoo or AOL

    Using Bing to browse Porn would explain 33% of US searches.

    Using Bing through Yahoo would explain .3% (or less)

    Using Bing through AOL would explain .03% (or less)

    Yup. That adds up to about 1/3rd.

  63. Microsoft paid for Bing be the default FF search. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I agree that monopolies can be unhealthy.

    More detail about the ethics: Microsoft pays Mozilla Foundation through Yahoo to make Bing the default search engine in Firefox. Bing is used by a lot of people because they don't know about other options. That isn't "popular".

    Windows 10 is used by a lot of people because they were forcefully switched away from their original Microsoft OS version. That isn't "popular".

  64. Bing sneaking in? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    I think it is instructive that Bing is being used behind the scenes where users are not actually choosing it. Beyond that, they mentioned AOL and Yahoo. Their users are the most unsophisticated users on the Internet and may not even be aware of other search options.

  65. bing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually use Bing more and more these days. Don't want all my data to be captured by Google. And M$ much more incompetent to use big data in any creepy way anyway.

  66. Re:Microsoft paid for Bing be the default FF searc by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    The one computer I own that does run Win10 has Bing blocked.

  67. Sounds about right... by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Since Microsoft has a habit of every patch returning Bing and Microsoft Edge to be the default; 1/3 of the internet searches sounds right with the percentage of clueless net users that have no clue how to change defaults.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT