If You Type 1+2+3 Into Your iPhone's Calculator on iOS 11, You Probably Won't Get 6 (qz.com)

A reader shares a report: If you've upgraded your iPhone's operating system to iOS 11, try this: Go to the calculator app and quickly type 1+2+3. You likely won't get 6. You might get 23, or 24, or 16, or 32, or something else, depending on what buttons you tap and in what order, and, obviously, none of which is the right answer. It seems to be because of a new animation in the calculator app, where a button briefly fades to white when you press it. The result is that if you press an operator button (i.e., the plus sign) before the short animation finishes, the app ignores it. So, 1 + 2 + 3 accidentally gets read as 1 + 23.

Comments

Neat!

[Known Nutter]

I enjoy wheat toast with orange marmalade!

Slow news day?

First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

After a basic hello world intro, I had to write a calculator to add subtract multiply and divide in the first week of college. Had mine worked like apples Iâ(TM)d have likely failed. How does this happen?

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Gotta have a butterfly. Yours had no butterfly.

Re:First CS assignment.

[gweihir]

You probably were more qualified than these morons at that point...

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Math is hard.
In Windows, open the calculator and do this:
Take the square root of 4
Subtract 2
You should get 0, but you don't.

The calc app does some sort of weird floating point math (despite the fact that the square root of 4 is exactly 2 and no floating point math is needed) and comes up with an answer of

-1.068281969439142e-19

Math is hard

Re:First CS assignment.

[H3lldr0p]

Someone skipped the day(s) they were teaching about how to do significant digits in Numerical Methods.

Like they had to skip a lot of days because that was the follow up conversation we had after each major section. As in how to tell what is and what isn't a good answer to the math we were just given to do.

Re:First CS assignment.

[burtosis]

For small values of 6 this is accurate.

Re:First CS assignment.

[bjohnso5]

The Win10 calculator just gave me this result: -8.1648465955514287168521180122928e-39

Re:First CS assignment.

[hawguy]

After a basic hello world intro, I had to write a calculator to add subtract multiply and divide in the first week of college. Had mine worked like apples Iâ(TM)d have likely failed. How does this happen?

You didn't have a GUI keyboard with animated keys.

This is why I still keep my trusty HP-15C calculator on my desk -- for when I need to do some quick arithmetic, it's still easier to use the calculator than my computer or worse (as this example shows), a phone.

Re:First CS assignment.

[nine-times]

How does this happen?

It explains how it happened in the summary:

It seems to be because of a new animation in the calculator app, where a button briefly fades to white when you press it. The result is that if you press an operator button (i.e., the plus sign) before the short animation finishes, the app ignores it. So, 1 + 2 + 3 accidentally gets read as 1 + 23.

It's not doing math wrong. It does a brief animation when you press a button, and it doesn't necessarily read the next button you press while the animation is happening. Therefore, if you press the calculator buttons too quickly, it won't register all the things you pressed. Based on the buttons you do press, it does the math correctly.

So if you press "1+2+3" it might miss the second "+" and register "1+23" and give you "24" as an answer.

Re:First CS assignment.

[jellomizer]

It isn't a problem with it doing the math. It is a problem of capturing the key press. Being that the button decided to do some fancy animations I expect it just prevented the next plus button from being registered.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

No idea how they come up with this since the epsilon of the double-precision 2 is 4.440892098500626e-16.

Clearly someone failed floating point math ...

Re:First CS assignment.

[cheesybagel]

Typical Apple. Form over function.

They already made smartphones which couldn't make phone calls, so I guess this is just one more instance in that vein.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Hahaha youre super smrat

Re:First CS assignment.

[nine-times]

Typical Apple. Form over function.

It's a bug. A stupid bug, but I'm sure it wasn't intentional and that they'll fix it.

They already made smartphones which couldn't make phone calls

I'm not sure what this is referring to. The iPod touch? If so, that's not really a fair criticism. It's not meant to be a smartphone.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

The problem is, it also animates the number after the +, so you think it actually registered it, when it registered it, but ignored it anyway.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Hal_Porter]

Because corporations have an age like people do.

Apple straight out of college was an effective place with Woz doing the design and Jobs doing the marketing. I.e. in human terms they were an fresh face type, straight out of college and keen to change the world.

Apple had a mid life crisis when Jobs was fired. People like Sculley and his successors almost run it into the ground. Human terms - mid 20's crisis.

Jobs came back and introduced OS-X and the iPhone. Apple prospered. Human terms : mid thirties prosperity.

Now Jobs is gone and Woz is estranged. And they're making dumb mistakes like this. And, probably more importantly following the industry trend to price gouge people through built in obsolescence, removing features and unserviceability.

Human terms : coming to the end of a tech career.

Re:First CS assignment.

[sexconker]

It gets even weirder than that!

4 @ - 2 = -8.1648465955514287168521180122928e-39 (@ is the shortcut for clicking the square root key)
4 y .5 - 2 = 1.0605907030850721689734498566293e-38 (y is the shortcut for clicking the "x to the power of y" key)
4 y ( 1 / 2 ) - 2 = -8.1648465955514287168521180122928e-39 (y is the shortcut for clicking the "x to the power of y" key)

It even shows "0.5" after you type the closing parenthesis when doing 4 y ( 1 / 2 ). Yet the result differs compared to 4 y .5 - 2 (or 4 y 0.5 - 2).

WTFOOK MS?

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

It's not doing math wrong. It does a brief animation

That's it--it's doing calculator wrong. It's the fetish nowadays with ani-fucking-mations. These people need something else to play with.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

My Honda has a similar issue. The animations mean i have to wait for it to finish before selecting the next item. Fun while driving.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Fuck you, it's a feature, not a bug.
Signed,
Apple.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

I think cheesybagel is referring to the one where you had to "hold it right" because the antenna wasn't configured well.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

WhyTF does Win10 Calculator have a hamburger icon to switch modes?! Thatâ(TM)s not even good design. Just MS security through obscurity I guess.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Brockmire]

When they say, "don't text and drive", they really mean "put the fucking phone down and don't type."

Re:First CS assignment.

[omnichad]

There's nothing wrong with animation. It gives feedback the same way as the click of a key on a physical keyboard. It's only the implementation that's at fault here.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Aighearach]

I'm using Mathdroid, which you can get from the fdroid repo. It is easily my most used mobile app. Scrollback buffer, variable support, hitting a bare operator automatically inserts the last answer in front, etc.

Actually, it works better than any of the linux calculators I got from a distro, ever. HP-15C is nice, and I'd probably use something similar if I didn't have Mathdroid.

Re:First CS assignment.

[UnknownSoldier]

Because they are morons. i.e. OSX 10.10.5's Calculator app:

Enter: 88.02

Press: +/-
Will show: -88.02000000000001

Press: +/-
Will show: 88.02000000000004

This isn't rocket science just basic Computer Science. Apparently these morons haven't figured out what a sign bit is. Maybe they should talk to their iOS division ...

--
WhereTF is the default Calculator App on iPad??? You shipped one with iOS.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

It's actually a Reverse Hipster Test, and mandatory helpful one at that. In order to pass the test, simply don't be in such a hurry, chill dude!

Re:First CS assignment.

[fahrbot-bot]

Typical Apple. Form over function.

They already made smartphones which couldn't make phone calls, so I guess this is just one more instance in that vein.

They also don't grow, or even sell, apples.

Re:First CS assignment.

[fahrbot-bot]

It isn't a problem with it doing the math. It is a problem of capturing the key press. Being that the button decided to do some fancy animations I expect it just prevented the next plus button from being registered.

It takes courage to provide an input buffer.

Re:First CS assignment.

[UnknownSoldier]

More Apple shenanigans with OSX 10.10.5 Calculator app:

99.99
[+/-]
= -99.98999999999999 (WTF?)

-0.01
= -99.99999999999999 (WTF!?)

Apple Logic: 99.99 [+/-] - 0.01 = -99.99. ** double facepalm **

/oblg. Picard: WTF is this shit?

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

or any kind of true multi-tasking.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

I think the reference is Antennagate from 7 years ago.

And by "can't make calls", they mean the signal was degraded if you held your finger over a gap in the antenna.

This kind of thing happens when your mom doesn't have an iPhone to hand-me-down, so you wind up with an Android and now hate all things Apple.

Re:First CS assignment.

[EndlessNameless]

Someone isn't using the new .NET calculator. You still on Win7 by any chance?

On the bright side, -8.1648465955514287168521180122928e-39 is much more accurate than -1.068281969439142e-19, and I mean that both sarcastically and not sarcastically.

I understand returning a FLOAT from a square root operation. Kind of funny in this case, but the real question is: Does this follow IEEE rounding guidelines?

Re:First CS assignment.

[david_thornley]

I found that I could lose a brick of connection if I licked my finger and pressed hard on the junction. Apple made a dumb decision, but the effects were seriously overblown in the media.

Re:First CS assignment.

[tsqr]

They already made smartphones which couldn't make phone calls

I'm not sure what this is referring to. The iPod touch? If so, that's not really a fair criticism. It's not meant to be a smartphone.

He's probably referring to the "You're holding it wrong" issue that resulted in Apple shipping cases to iPhone 4 owners to mitigate an antenna problem.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Because pretty is now considered more important than functional?

Actually this has always been true in many things, it’s just a relatively recent development in computer UI design. See for example clothing design: “ok next we’re going to finish this unseasonally hot suit by tying this random bit of cloth around your neck for no apparent reason. It’s uncomfortable, pointless and presents a choking hazard in some places, but that’s just how we roll.”

Re:First CS assignment.

[v1]

As a developer I can see exactly how something like this can happen, and I've had variations of it happen to me numerous times over the years. This is a case of the person writing the app making assumptions about how the user interface behaves, and these assumptions turning out to be wrong OR the interface not behaving as documented. (more likely the latter)

The person that wrote the app was probably "safe to assume" that taps on the screen will be buffered during animations and other gui actions. So the app waits for you to tap, and the user taps a coordinate on the screen and your app is notified of this. You look at the location on the screen, figure out the user pressed "2, remember it, and tell the gui to do the fade on the "2" to indicate the press was accepted. Then you go back to waiting for another tap.

If in the meanwhile, the gui is displaying the fading of the "2", the user taps "3", the interface should buffer the tap, and it can either notify the app immediately (during the animation) of the new tap, OR it can wait until the animation is done and then notify the app.

I don't know which approach the gui takes. If it notifies immediately, I would expect the app to tell the gui to stop the "2" animation and start the "3" animation, as this leads to better response time. SOME apps I've seen just linearly buffer and the app won't be notified of the "3" until the "2" is done animating. In those cases you can mash a bunch of keys and then look at the screen as they are animated one at a time until all keys are animated. This is generally considered poor design but I still see it from time to time.

So what went wrong here? There's several possibilities, depending on what the gui supports.
- the gui always disables tap detection while the specific sort of animation used on the "2" is being done
- the developer used an animation api that specifically does not buffer taps when there was a buffering api available he should have used
- the application told the gui to disable buffering during the animation (or neglected to indicate it wanted buffering, if it's not the default action)
- a bug in the app caused it to not buffer taps made while the gui was still rendering an animation

There are probably a few other possibilities but that's the 99% of it. Could be a bug in the API, could be a documentation problem with the API, could be the developer used the wrong API, or used the right API in the wrong way, or got all the information he needed but just bumbled it and lost it in this specific circumstance. There's just no way to know who to blame, and I wouldn't care to take a bet either way.

But really... a user interface bug in a calculator app makes front page news on slashdot? Must be a slow news day?

Re: First CS assignment.

[BronsCon]

When AC says Honda, I'm assuming he means the in-dash navigation and radio. Imagine, for a moment, that you think you hear sirens, but you don't see flashing lights, so you decide to turn the radio down to hear them better. You can't really wait for a safe place to pull over to do that, since you may end up impeding an emergency vehicle before then, so you're stuck fumbling with the damn infotainment system and waiting for it to animate every... single... button... press... before... it... will... do... anything... else.

By the time you've turned the damn thing down enough to hear, the ambulance or fire truck is up your ass, because you had to take your eyes off the road (and your rear-view mirror) to look for the spot on the screen to touch for volume in the first place.

Can we just have fucking physical knobs and buttons back, please?

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

My phone is still on iOS 10 and it's affected by this bug. So it's been around for a while and they haven't fixed it yet.... Too busy redoing the control center UI for a 3rd time perhaps

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Typical Apple. Form over function.

It's actually the other way around - this happened for functional reasons. UIKit-based animations have an option to disable user interaction during an animation. This is switched on by default, and it has been since the very first version of the iPhoneOS SDK. It had to be switched on by default because otherwise, users who were used to double-clicking to activate things with mouse-based interfaces would trigger actions twice when double-tapping on buttons (and yes, if you watch non-technical people, absolutely loads of them double-click and double-tap even when they don't have to). Auto-disabling user interaction during animations is the smartest default.

All that's happened here is that somebody in Apple forgot to switch that option off, and it's the kind of thing that's easily missed during testing. After all, despite what people say, this isn't new to iOS 11 - the bug has been present for a couple of years now and it's only just been noticed.

Re:First CS assignment.

[freeze128]

Did your app have buttons that fade out when you press them? No? Go back and do it again.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

To be fair, something that is e-19 is for all intents and purposes zero. Whoever wrote it simply didn't round numbers that were sufficiently small. Finding the root of a number when you aren't a human that has memorized that root of 4 is 2, is a fair bit more involved and involves integer unfriendly division among other things https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nth_root
Could they have used a lookup table? Sure, but who wants to bother with that when you have all this processing power now a days /s

Re:First CS assignment.

[dacut]

How does this happen?

It explains how it happened in the summary...

I think the "this" refers to "shipping an obviously untested product."

Part of the problem is that we (collectively) just don't get how complex software is. Sure, a good software engineer who sits down and thinks through the implications of a change will do so, but in the modern rush to market that's a rare happening. In this case, I'm guessing something like the following happened:

• "Hey, we're getting usability reports about widgets accidentally being double tapped while an app is being swapped in. What can we do to fix this?"
• "We would need to do this in the UIKit. Maybe some visual indication it's been tapped with a lockout period?"
• "Ok, great. We need this by next Friday to get it into the next iOS build."
• "That's tight, but we'll manage."
• Builds, tests... "Ok, let's see what apps use this. Calculator..." tapping deliberately "Right, looks good, results are correct. Ready to ship."

That said, much as we (software engineers) don't like it, there's something to be said for shipping quickly and, sometimes, before things are ready. Users reward this behavior, and shipping quickly can mean the difference between a product or company that succeeds vs. one that fails. The saying is "you can't shine shit," but I've seen countless examples otherwise (and the Mythbusters disproved this in, well, a literal sense). I hate it; despite it, in fact. Push back against it. But it's hard to argue when there's a throng of consumers ready to spend their money on it.

So, we're relegated to having to be judicious in what we push back against. Is it safety critical? Will someone get maimed or killed by this? If it's running on an iPhone, the answer is probably no. For Apple here, the main result is a bit of embarrassment -- a calculator that seems to give wacky results. A civil engineer using this for estimating should see this kind of issue immediately (and is unlikely to use the iOS calculator for final documents). Someone trying to split their restaurant bill, maybe not, it's an acceptable risk. The Excel 2007 multiplication bug was probably more serious because that's an application that is more likely to be used in civil engineering. If you're writing software that could lethally irradiate someone and encounter shady practices, immediately raise flags and alert everyone who will listen.

Ok, so we're not going to manually test everything on a smart phone before a new OS is released. What can we do? Push for more automation. Making aesthetic judgements automatically might still be a bit difficult, but we ought to be able to simulate key misregistrations. A quick check would be to do this in software to see the effect of a change while you're hacking away on your laptop, but a robot providing millions of taps and swipes on actual hardware would be even more insightful. This would be daunting for most startups trying to make the next Zynbookwitter on shoestring VC funding, but child's play for the likes of Apple or Google.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Wrath0fb0b]

You'd have to RTFA to find out. Or I'll help you: there is a little animation and so the second "+" doesn't register. It's as if you hit "1 + 23".

Every input device on planet earth has some maximum rate at which it can process events. If yours is slow, that's a performance problem -- in this case it looks like it was pretty crappy because the animation had to complete before you could enter the next thing.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

I haven't ever heard of someone manipulating the bits in a floating point number. That isn't something a programmer would normally do to flip the sign. Normally, they would multiply by -1.

Also, flipping the sign bit isn't all that you'd need to do. The digits are stored in 2's complement in IEEE 754 format.

Someone who knew basic computer science would know that.

Re:First CS assignment.

[hey!]

This isn't a math problem. It's basic programming; you don't rely on tests of equality between the results of floating point calculations and integer quantities.

What's going on here is that the sqrt function yields a floating point number that's close to the integer 2, and that's rounded for display down to 2. The round for display routine clearly chooses not to round if the difference is large relative to the amount. For example take the number 1000, and add .00000000001. It will display 1000.00000000001. Now do the same with 1,000,000; it will display 1,000,000 even though internally the number is 1,000,000.00000000001.

It's not an entirely unreasonably way of doing it, although most people would tend to round to a fixed number of digits.

Re:First CS assignment.

[chipschap]

Emacs calc is the ultimate :) Actually it is.

Re:First CS assignment.

[hvidstue]

Win10 calculator does the same thing

Re:First CS assignment.

[Paradise Pete]

It's a bug. A stupid bug, but I'm sure it wasn't intentional and that they'll fix it.

Of course it's a bug, but how do you not see it within the first five minutes of testing? When I saw this earlier I thought the claim must be ridiculous, but it's actually more difficult to avoid this problem than it is to demonstrate it. I like my Apple stuff and I get a new iPhone every year, but iOS 11 and Mac OS High Sierra are rife with small disappointments and annoyances like this.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Mikkeles]

"... if you press the calculator buttons too quickly,..."

So: if you're not pressing it right?

Re:First CS assignment.

[unrtst]

Trusty old xcalc gives the correct result on all of those :-)
As does gcalctool and gcalccmd.

I understand (more or less) why those results are coming from the windows calculator, but this problem was solved a VERY VERY long time ago. How the hell did they allow that through?

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

True. And growing or selling apples is just as irrelevant to Apple as reliably making phone calls.

Re:First CS assignment.

[fisted]

But does systemd-calcd compute the right result when you IPC it the math term via dbus?

Re:First CS assignment.

[fisted]

Thanks for insightfully repeating what TFS already said.

And it really doesn't matter whether it's doing math wrong, or whether it's doing software wrong.

Re: First CS assignment.

[sexconker]

Do Alt+1/2/3/4 not work?

Re:First CS assignment.

[fisted]

...and you found that out how exactly?

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

It's the slow animations that have become intolerable to me. On my Windows computer I can turn off animations completely, but the iPhone seems to have slowed down animations with the latest OS version. It's so annoying to press a button and have to wait for the damn thing to fade in or out before continuing. And there doesn't seem to be any way to turn off the animations. I think the Millennials value "pretty" over "efficient."

Re:First CS assignment.

[Strider-]

Only if you do the arithmetic in reverse polish notation.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

I doubt it. Every single thing Apple makes has this problem. Most people just donâ(TM)t use them fast enough to care, unless itâ(TM)s something like a calculator. This is why Windows users are able to do basic tasks so much faster than Mac users. They donâ(TM)t have to wait 0.75 seconds between every minor operation for the OS to draw some stupid useless animation that you canâ(TM)t disable and blocks input until it finishes. I hate Mac OSâ(TM)s animations and reliance on pointer input so much. How anyone can use it without going insane from them is just amazing to me.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Lanthanide]

Windows 10 with the calculator in Scientific mode gives me -8.1648465955514287168521180122928e-39

When I put it on Standard I get your number. Interesting that there's more to Scientific mode than simply extra buttons.

Re:First CS assignment.

[UnknownSoldier]

> I haven't ever heard of someone manipulating the bits in a floating point number.

That's because you lack experience. A classic trick is to use an union:

union int_float_t
{
        uint32_t i;
        float f;
};

If you actually understood the IEEE754 32-bit and 64-bit format you wouldn't be so naive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Sign bit: 1 bit
Exponent width: 8 bits
Significand precision: 24 bits (23 explicitly stored)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Sign bit: 1 bit
Exponent: 11 bits
Significand precision: 53 bits (52 explicitly stored)

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

The Honda in-dash radio has an "Audio" button at the top left which instantly turns the radio on or, more usefully, off.

One tap.

None of this tapping 1,000 times on the volume button to mute the radio. Just turn the fucking thing off.

It's not rocket surgery.

Re:First CS assignment.

[thegarbz]

The calc app does some sort of weird floating point math (despite the fact that the square root of 4 is exactly 2 and no floating point math is needed)

How do you calculate the squareroot of 4? No seriously look it up. The squareroot of 4 is obviously 2, but how do you calculate it? Only a couple of algorithms work which don't require floating point math actually work: Getting a square root is hard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and those that do are inefficient enough that you won't find them on a computer. ... Or an electronic calculator for that matter.

The problem is that the answer is an approximation. The sqrt(4) gives you an answer with a shitload of zeros before demonstrating its inaccuracy so the calculator truncates it and displays it as 2. But that's not what it calculated. When you subtract 2 from it, the errors that previously appeared at the 19th decimal now are the significant digits so it gets displayed on the screen in scientific notation.

By the way I get: 1.0605907030850721689734498566293e-38 so my windows calculator is more accurate than yours by 19 orders of magnitude. :-)

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

It may take a few lawsuits to get back to an interface which actually works while driving without requiring the user to take their eyes off the road.

Since we had a well proven system for decades and the replacement is defective by design because it's unsafe, hopefully it won't take a few juries long to award big bucks in a few high profile cases to get manufacturers to fix the error of their ways.

Normally, I'm not particularly plaintiff friendly in product liability lawsuits, but in this case the manufacturer better show me if I'm on the jury that their design decision SAVED more lives than it cost and that they could not have reasonably achieved the same life saving feature without costing (fewer) other lives. That's a pretty high bar to clear!

I actually drive an older car now and one reason is just this -- I looked at replacing it and found the UIs to basic functions in too many midrange cars to be unsafe.

Re: First CS assignment.

[BronsCon]

The Honda in-dash radio has an "Audio" button at the top left which instantly turns the radio on or, more usefully, off.

One tap after taking your eyes off the road to look for the button.

Fixed.

Re:First CS assignment.

[techno-vampire]

So what went wrong here?

If I had to guess, it's a failure in testing, and one that I've seen more than once. The testers only test to see if it works right when used the way the designers expect it to use but never check to see what happens if the users hit a wrong key, type too fast or otherwise enter unexpected data. The reason for this is, "In a perfect world, people wouldn't do things like this." And, if you point out that this isn't a perfect world, you're lucky if all you get is a dirty look.

Re:First CS assignment.

[nctritech]

Windows 10 Pro build 1607 "calc.exe" invoked WIndows 10 app shows the e-19 number. Can't speak for other builds or apps. Obligatory: appy app app apps, LUDDITE.

Re:First CS assignment.

[edx93]

It's the speed, not the logic or computation: do 1+1+1 rapidly, you'll get the same problem. Do it slowly, and you'll be fine. That being said, this is a silly oversight. Should not have happened.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

It happens because some people accept 4chan memes as fact rather than actually check the truth of the statement.
No wrong answer here on my 6s or GF's SE.

Re:First CS assignment.

[jittles]

After a basic hello world intro, I had to write a calculator to add subtract multiply and divide in the first week of college. Had mine worked like apples Iâ(TM)d have likely failed. How does this happen?

Based on my experience with iOS 11, I suspect that only 1 in 10 or maybe 1 in 20 of the people working on the release have even implemented a Hello World function. Worst release ever. I have to restart my device about 15 times a day because the UI locks up completely and I can't do anything. And it starts doing that about a week after installing the update / factory resetting the device.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Fuck you, old man. You'll be dead soon. Millennials value security over speed, which is why the Rust back-end takes a little bit longer to compute. And since we don't want the device to look dead, the Ruby on Rails front end links some animation gems so the user won't get bored.

Re:First CS assignment.

[slashrio]

I hate delays in my work flow caused by idiots who want to show how flashy their UI can act.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Obviously Apple failed to take into account its compulsively finger-licking population. For everyone else, though, it seemed to work fine.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

This is a very different issue. The fact that square roots can only be approximated in general is not news. Nor is the fact that a particular calculator application doesn't do special-cases for square roots which have known, exact results.

You just shouldn't expect exact answers from numerical calculations. (And this isn't "weird", it's the way essentially every computer and calculator ever does these calculations, except that maybe some do special cases for answers with exact results.)

But it's a completely different thing to undermine an application in order to display a worthless animation.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Dread_ed]

Pretty sure it started by licking his finger...

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

I always thought that Apple took stuff seriously, such as taps should have precedence over fancy animations and basically anything else the phone is doing at the moment. I guess I was wrong. Sucks to be you, Apple.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Gr8Apes]

The reason for this is, "In a perfect world, people wouldn't do things like this." And, if you point out that this isn't a perfect world, you're lucky if all you get is a dirty look.

The dirty look should be saved for the mirror. In a perfect world, the device handles how fast I type. Period.

Re:First CS assignment.

[techno-vampire]

And for that matter, in a perfect world, the testers wouldn't be told how the devs expected the software to be used. Instead, they'd be expected to mess around with it, use it in unexpected ways (not that typing too fast should be unexpected) and try to make it fail.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

I bet Numerical Methods isn't even taught any more. After all, programming is easy, anyone can do it!

Re:First CS assignment.

[DontBeAMoran]

I have the Win10 Creators Edition and the calculator gave me this result: "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that".

I knew Win10 was crap, but come on. My name's not Dave!

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

On my Honda there is no volume knob but you can adjust the volume by clicking or swiping the control on the steering wheel under your left thumb. Or if you like you can hit the "Audio Off" button in the upper left of the central touch screen, which yes, is still the touch screen but the most "deep" part of it. And no waiting for the UI. (Not that the volume control on the touchscreen requires you to wait; I'm not sure what part of the system the [other] AC was referring to.)

I'm still a fan of knobs, but the design isn't all that bad.

Re:First CS assignment.

[antdude]

Wow, I could reproduce it easily in my updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 machine. Why hasn't MS fixed it?

Re:First CS assignment.

[antdude]

Maybe Apple already knows about and doesn't consider it a high priority bug. When I did SQA testings, I saw a lot of crazy issues. Lots of them don't get due to lack of resources like times, developers, etc. :(

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Only if the calculator is in standard mode, if its in scientific mode you get -8.1648465955514287168521180122928e-39

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Can we just have fucking physical knobs and buttons back, please?

How about also have files that contain executable and data, be able to access them and do as we will, instead of them being cleverly hidden and accessible only by a magic-button interface that may not have a button for what you want to do?

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Only a game developer or someone who never learned how to write a GUI would think like that. Everyone else would use button widgets and any application developer who goes low enough to have to manually deal with UI input queues rather than component events should be fired. There should be no reason for anyone to be manually translating screen coordinates to component locations. Are the iOS controls/API really that primitive? It's worse than poor design, it's cutting down a tree and spending a week turning it into a small raft to cross a short river instead of walking three more feet down the road and using the existing bridge. And then your raft sank when you were half way across.

The animations are probably playing on the same thread as the one processing input and thus it can't do both at the same time. This is an architecture flaw in iOS' UI toolkit. Non-games shouldn't even have an API to be able to block things like this. Without the low level API, the only way to do it would be to disable all buttons once one is depressed and then re-enable them when the animations finish. But then that would also mean the app developers changed what the disabled UI state looked like so all the buttons wouldn't flash when you're using it.

Re:First CS assignment.

[DutchUncle]

I do embedded systems using an RTOS. I can track inputs at the same time as I'm updating a screen and communicating on three RS485 serial lines and a CAN line. How can Apple fail to keep up when they have about 8x as many cycles and 16x as much RAM as I have?

Re:First CS assignment.

[Obfuscant]

Wow, I could reproduce it easily in my updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 machine. Why hasn't MS fixed it?

The hatred for Microsoft runs deep in this group, to ignore the fact that the calculations are actually being done by an IEEE-754 compliant floating point processor in the Intel or AMD CPU, and not by Microsoft doing it in their code.

What's fun is having an 80 bit IEEE processing unit on a 64 bit CPU. You can get different answers depending on whether the calculations are done entirely in 80 bit FPU or 64 bit CPU.

So, it isn't Microsoft's failure to fix. It's a known limitation of using a digital computer to "do math".

You might pipe back that the computer could be written to work in arbitrary precision binary coded decimal, but that leaves the problem of errors at the edge of the precision, no matter what that precision is. Even "arbitrary" doesn't mean "unlimited", both for speed and hardware constraints.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Darinbob]

Because companies continue to use novices for applications that seem easy or boring, without sufficient oversight. Maybe they spent all their money on expensive UX experts but paid only peanuts for the actual implementation. The QA probably also skimped and focused on whether it looked nice and animated properly, but withouth a use case of a customer hoping to correcty do a calculation.

Besides, it's an iPhone. Apple didn't lose any customers over the "you're holding it wrong" antenna problem, so I don't think they're worried about the calculator and the "you're tapping it wrong" problem.

Re:First CS assignment.

[antdude]

So, how are we expect to get the true math answers with these calculations then? :(

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Why do you need to take your eyes off the road? It's right in the top left - you'll find it by feel from the edge of the display. Tap. Sound off. Done.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Darinbob]

Again, same problem at on Apple. They don't put good developers on applications that project management thinks are easy. Problem there is you don't put a new hire or intern to work on a calculator that intended to be accurate; too many people come out of school thinking that floating point is a magic black box that always does the right thing and you don't need to know any numerical analysis to use it.

Never mind that people got this right on the first microchip based calculator which was on a fricking 4-bit cpu! The reason they got it right is because you can't do math on a 4-bit cpu without actually *knowing* math. They had the proper domain knowledge for the application they were writing.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Darinbob]

And so the line managers and product managers think they can assign any old programmer to the task. They probably thought the GUI was the hard part.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Darinbob]

Also weird - the Standard view in the calculator gives a different answer from the Scientific view!

Re:First CS assignment.

[Obfuscant]

So, how are we expect to get the true math answers with these calculations then? :(

If you want "true math answers", do math symbolically instead of numerically.

There are entire books and courses on numerical methods that talk about doing calculations on numbers instead of symbols, how to minimize errors, and why they appear.

Re:First CS assignment.

[antdude]

Wow, that's technical. :(

Re:First CS assignment.

[Obfuscant]

Math is a technical subject, as are numerical methods. It's the guts of a computer, did you think it would be baling wire and spit?

Re: First CS assignment.

[Gadget_Guy]

My phone is still on iOS 10 and it's affected by this bug.

I have two iPhones in front of me; one with iOS 10 and one with iOS 11. I can easily trigger the bug on 11, but can't make it work at all on 10.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Whether 10^-19 is important or not depends on context to some extent, but you would hope that a numerical method would not be too bothered by something 19 orders of magnitude smaller than the original quantities. If you were already working with quantities of 10^-19 then it would be more concerning.

Re:First CS assignment.

[CrybabiesArePeople]

All the nifty animation should'nt impede the "onclick" ("ontouch"?) events. I would put the blame here, pure and simple.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Zorpheus]

It is rounding to a fixed number of significant digits, which is the only right thing to do with floating point numbers.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Golden_Rider]

The issue is that the number buttons in the calculator behave differently from the operator buttons. If you look closely, you will see that if you hit a number button, it will fade out immediately after being clicked. But if you e.g. hit the "+" button, it will STAY highlighted, probably to remind you of what operation you selected (and that you actually HAVE selected something) while thinking about what number to put in next. Only if you then hit a number button, the "+" button will fade out, which takes about half a second, and while it does this, it does not register another click on that specific button. So you could put in 1+2-3, but you cannot put in 1+2+3 without first waiting for the "+" button to fade out completely.

Re:First CS assignment.

[JackieBrown]

Use your slide ruler

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

In fairness you're moving the goal posts here.

One tap, one twiddle, one push of a button: it's all the same, whether the tap, twiddle or push location is in a row or column of physical buttons around your stereo or on the screen of the infotainment system.

If you 'know', by muscle memory experience, where the physical knob is you can learn, in the same way, where the screen location is.

I'll agree: over-busy infotainment screens are dangerous / bad; multi-layer menus can be dangerous / bad / annoying; lack of tactile feedback is bad / annoying.

Pointless and ungrounded complaints - they're bad / annoying too...

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Fuck the people who are to stupid to us the calculator. It works just fine. I use it about 100 times a day at work. You fucking kids need everything fucking a specific way. Get your head out of your asses. It works just fine. Does the math. Dont fat finger shit and it wont be a problem. Guess you bitches have to have something to complain about since the new X did sell very well unlike all you had hopped it would flop. Seriously want to bitch about so ething try the mac pro’s active bar display. Way more problematic then the calculator on the phone.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

I guess you could tweak the algorithm. Once you get your floating point square root, round it to some smaller number of significant figures, and then check if that's an exact square root. If so, go with the rounded value.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

circa 1994 bullfrog entertainment had it right on sindicate wars... input should be queued before delivery to input requests... other games as soccer manager circa 1992 did that too... never again saw that over the last 20+ years

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

yeah, I recall, i would write all the teams names followed by enter, and then click on the players to assign them names!!! that was awesome!!!

Re:First CS assignment.

[The MAZZTer]

AFAIK square root is usually estimated. So if you try a square root calculation that you expect an exact answer from you will be disappointed. It's not the calculator app.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

You didn't have a UX team doing the design for you. The idiots at UX departments force the form over functionality design into every piece of software they meet. On iOS 12 Apple removes the number buttons from calculator as distracting elements which are too hard for users to handle.

Re: First CS assignment.

[BronsCon]

YOU might. I won't, because I'm not familiar with the layout of the display. What about literally ever other function, though?

Re: First CS assignment.

[BronsCon]

In fairness you're moving the goal posts here.

After reading why you think that, I don't believe that I am, but I'm open to being shown otherwise.

One tap, one twiddle, one push of a button: it's all the same, whether the tap, twiddle or push location is in a row or column of physical buttons around your stereo or on the screen of the infotainment system.

If you 'know', by muscle memory experience, where the physical knob is you can learn, in the same way, where the screen location is.

You can feel your way around physical knobs and buttons; not so with a flat touch screen. Even moreso in a moving vehicle, where you have to compensate for vertical and lateral inertia, or a car driven by two people who prefer the seat in different positions (so it's never really in the same place), all of which renders muscle memory useless.

The basis on which I'm supposedly moving the goal posts is just plain incorrect. Further, the goal posts were set by the AC who said

My Honda has a similar issue. The animations mean i have to wait for it to finish before selecting the next item. Fun while driving.

That is, this was never limited to the volume buttons, or the on/off button; I merely used volume as an example and an AC countered with a different example, but the goal posts, which are simply not mine to move, have remained where they were.

I'll agree: over-busy infotainment screens are dangerous / bad; multi-layer menus can be dangerous / bad / annoying; lack of tactile feedback is bad / annoying.

Let me ask you, what makes those screens dangerous? Is it that you have to take your eyes off of the road to see what you're doing on them? I can't think of anything else, so I'm asking, but I'll continue on the assumption that I am correct, because I know taking your eyes off the road ever while driving is dangerous and I know muscle memory is useless with these displays, compounded by the fact that I'm not even the source for that hypothesis but, rather, and trumpeting (after some careful analysis of the claim) what I've heard countless others who actually have these things in their vehicles say. If you can show me otherwise, please do.

Pointless and ungrounded complaints - they're bad / annoying too...

By the above assumption, I don't believe that my complaint was unfounded. Pointless? Perhaps, if you ignore the fact that I have to share the road with people whose vehicles literally coerce them to take their eyes off the road while driving, or that I may want to buy a new car eventually and would like there to be knobs and buttons, rather than a screen, on the dash when I do. Raising the complaint here would be pointless, except that I come here for discussion, and the complaint started one, I come here to have my views and beliefs challenged, and you've just done that, and I come here to be entertained, which was taken care of by your laughable claim that I've "moved the goal posts".

As of this moment, the "complaint" which you write of has 3 Insightful moderations and no others. A pointless and ungrounded complaint is not insightful; at least three* other people read what I wrote and thought to themselves "yeah, I've experienced that", that's the point of what I wrote, that's the ground on which it is built.

--

*: At least three people with mod points. Statistically speaking, that number will be much higher. Only about half of people actually use their mod points, only about 1% of active users have them at any given time, and only 20% of active users read a given front page article on average. From that, knowing that there are a bit over six million users and that roughly 10% of them still regularly active on the site, we can extrapolate how many moderators read my comment and, from that (and the number of moderations), how

Re:First CS assignment.

[RonTheHurler]

I was also a developer, for IBM back in the 1990s. Somehow, back then we did a whole lot of usability testing that just doesn't seem to be done anymore. At all. I have this exact same problem with the phone app when it shows the little number in the red circle. If I check the status too quickly, I see the animation so I know the touch was received, but the number doesn't update.

Here's a thought -- can we have a "FEATURE" in the settings to TURN OFF all that annoying, time wasting animation crap? I mean, it's cute, it looks nice in the ads, kids like it, but get real, it's like the "kitchen of the future" videos from the 1950s. No one wants to wait around while the robotic cabinetry reveals the toaster. How convenient?

I want my electronics responses to be instantaneous. Animations be gone!

Re:First CS assignment.

[petervandervos]

So what went wrong here? If I had to guess, it's a failure in testing, and one that I've seen more than once. ...

My guess would be it worked perfectly while testing, but with the update of the calculator (part of the OS updating) lots of other things got updated also, making the calculator become unresponsive while doing the animations.

Re:First CS assignment.

[retchdog]

uh, he's trolling.

but numerical methods are really fascinating. for example, one of the asymptotically-fast multiplication algorithms uses discrete fourier transforms to work in a modulo field both faster and with fewer intermediate rounding steps. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Here's a thought -- can we have a "FEATURE" in the settings to TURN OFF all that annoying, time wasting animation crap?

IIRC back in the 90s, a version of Eudora had a preferences checkbox labeled "waste CPU cycles drawing trendy 3d junk."

In later releases after Eudora was bought out, the feature was considered unprofessional and removed. You'd never see that sort of cockiness in today's software.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Just tested using the calculator in Linux Mint MATE and it came out to 0 exactly. Nice.

Re:First CS assignment.

[mcswell]

I understand your points, but it is the case that on the gubuntu calculator, the answer comes out correct (0). I double-checked that it does reals. So perhaps there's s.t. down in its guts that rounds a number.

Re:First CS assignment.

[mcswell]

Got one on my desk, in case anyone wants to borrow it. (And yes, I know how to use it.)

Re:First CS assignment.

[mcswell]

There are ways around this problem; the gubuntu calculator gives the correct answer (0). Not sure how it does that internally, presumably some kind of rounding.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Blymie]

No no.. it's systemd. RPN is too 'old'. It's Forward polish notation.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

There's at least one other possibility: The calculator app explicitly flushes the input queue after the animation is done.

Re:First CS assignment.

[thegarbz]

I was bored at work today. Turns out I was wrong with the floating points. Windows calculator uses quotient of integers to represent numbers which introduces its own set of errors.

Gnome calculator uses digit by digit calculation. It's a searching algorithm that's actually quite a slow but you're bashing numbers into a screen here, not generating bitcoins so the slow speed isn't an issue. It also terminates so it's just fine if you truncate the output to a reasonable set of decimals. In my engineering degree one of our assignments was we had to make a scientific calculator. This was the default algorithm everyone tried (including me) and we quickly found that in a few bytes of code the slow 8bit processor both took forever to get lots of significant digits, and the algorithm also used up all the memory leaving none for other functions. The lecturers tested out product using large numbers (which truncated quickly), and numbers resulting in small answers which then exposed the students who just copied what math.h used.

Anyway it's fine for computers, but no so fine for something like a pocket calculator from the 80s. Since so much of math is based on exponents, calculators emphasise algorithms for computing exponents and then solve square roots via the exponential identity. For whatever reason Windows calculator also solves squareroots using the natural identity and

e^(0.5*ln(4)) = 1.999999999999999999999999999999999999991835153404448571283147881 (it gets longer but I got errors trying to post :-) )

subtract 2 you get -1.0605907030850721689734498566293e-38

The reason you got -1.068281969439142e-19 is because your calculator was in standard mode but mine is set to scientific, and windows doubles both the calculation precision and the number of significant digits display (from 16 to 32).

So it comes down to the method used (speed vs computational time trade-off) and the number of displayed digits. Ironically enough the Windows calculator is the one that calculates more like a traditional pocket calculator, the only difference is that it keeps the answer in a higher precision that it displays it on screen.

Re:First CS assignment.

[thegarbz]

*That natural log precision also depends on how windows calculates the exponential function.

Re: First CS assignment.

[thegarbz]

The problem comes to the calculator storing numbers in a way that gives more precision than its capable of displaying. But storing that precise number in memory.
Sqrt(4) in windows is apparently stored as 55604229018504692596833125437922908794411 over 27802114509252346298416562718961454397319 which on a display that only shows 32 digits comes out as 2.

The question is just how do you want to lose precision? Making a calculator less precise by arbitrarily truncating an answer to make an imprecise number look more precise in a few select scenarios is not a sensible approach.

Sensible would be to simply calculate digit by digit and throw processing power at the problem since that algorithm will terminate.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah - isn't Programming for Business Owners / Users ?

Re: First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

Well Their proces are extreme so it is only fitting that their software can not do math. Why should their software be able to do math, when the company itself, has never been able to figure out a sensible price for their products.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Desty]

Obviously the GUI *was* the hardest part, because that's what they broke.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

But does systemd-calcd compute the right result when you IPC it the math term via dbus?

Actually, if such a thing existed, then yes, it probably would.

The most annoying thing about systemd these days is no longer systemd itself, which is annoying enough, but all the incessant haters of it harping along, on and on and on, endlessly, despite the fact that perfectly good options without it now exist, in addition to the BSDs.

You'd think that would make the haters content and ready to get on with their lives with their new, shiny, non-systemd distros, but no...can't have that can, we?

Give it a fucking rest.

Re: First CS assignment.

[Darinbob]

For the Microsoft example, the GUI works just fine.
For the iPhone example, the GUI only broke because they did too much. There's no need for the extra animation, and clearly they focused their testing on whether it looked nice instead of whether it worked. If they kept the calculator simple it would have been a better product. This is a UX flaw.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Aighearach]

As a daily emacs user I couldn't disagree more! lol

Re:First CS assignment.

[jeremyp]

Forward Polish notation is just called Polish Notation

Re:First CS assignment.

[jeremyp]

Yes it is a bug, but it has been there at least since the first beta of iOS 11. They've had all the betas, the GA release and three point releases and it's still not fixed. I think the main reason is that the iOS calculator app is just a toy. It probably caught the engineers by surprise that anybody would care enough about it to make a fuss.

Thanks to all the publicity, they're going to have to fix it now. Frankly, they should have foreseen this.

Re:First CS assignment.

[jeremyp]

It was noticed and reported during the first beta of iOS 11. If it's so easy to fix, why haven't they?

Re:First CS assignment.

[arglebargle_xiv]

"You're typing it wrong".

Re:First CS assignment.

[n329619]

I can't see exactly how something like this can happen without being inexperienced or incompetent.

In software, the most crucial feature should be working before any animation. In this case, none of the taps animation should have the control factor to the actual command.

It feels like if I took out all the animation from that app and run it, that simple calculator would return a lot of fatal errors right on the spot.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Askmum]

You found a method to get a square root easily!?! It has dumbfounded met since years that there is no key for that, but there is one for a cube root. What's also stupid is that all trigonometric function go to their inverse when you press the Inv key, but for some reason they did not find that necessary to implement for the square key. How logical is it that the inverse of square is square root and how stupid is it not to implement that.
Sometimes you really ask yourself if people actually use the software that they write... even once.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Obfuscant]

uh, he's trolling.

I don' t think that people who don't understand computer "math" are trolling when they think they can get perfect precision because it is "a computer" and it is supposed to always give the perfect answers to "simple" problems. They're part of the generation that doesn't understand the tools they use and are shocked, I say, shocked when the "computer" tells them something that isn't perfect. That applies to "math", and to the sudden awareness that "the internet" is filled with sources that aren't vetted by experts and sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Re:First CS assignment.

[ponraul]

Apple makes it a point to hire women. Women are bad at math. This shouldn't surprise anyone.

Re:First CS assignment.

[nine-times]

Oh, if so, that's still not really a fair criticism. I owned that phone. It made phone calls just fine. I get that some people had some problems with it, but it was definitely blown out of proportion, and it was not at all a "smartphone which couldn't make phone calls".

Re:First CS assignment.

[Misagon]

You don't round to display in a calculator in the first place. What you get in the calculator display should reflect the true value in the accumulator.

Also, if sqrt(4.0) does not produce exactly 2.0 then there is something wrong with that code. 4.0 and 2.0 are powers of two, so there should not be any rounding when using IEEE floating point math.

Re:First CS assignment.

[Anonymous Coward]

But does systemd-calcd compute the right result when you IPC it the math term via dbus?

Works on Ubuntu current LTS for me.

You're typing it wrong.

[aix tom]

Although I wonder if the fix would be just to be brave enough to just remove the calculator. Maths is an outdated technology anyway...

Re:You're typing it wrong.

[Killall -9 Bash]

Math isn't outdated. The calculator interface is outdated. You should just ask Siri what 1+2+3 equals.

Re:You're typing it wrong.

[TykeClone]

You might get 23, or 24, or 16, or 32

Re:You're typing it wrong.

[Anonymous Coward]

siri just werks.

Re:You're typing it wrong.

[Anonymous Coward]

siri jus twerks

Re:You're typing it wrong.

[Anonymous Coward]

Math isn't outdated. The calculator interface is outdated. You should just ask Siri what 1+2+3 equals.

You're right. It's not outdated, it's racist. Math is Racist

Re:You're typing it wrong.

[Anonymous Coward]

Although I wonder if the fix would be just to be brave enough to just remove the calculator. Maths is an outdated technology anyway...

It would be braver to remove only the operator buttons, & leave the number buttons.

the rise of the eyecandy tards

[iggymanz]

UI and software quality is falling because of the emphasis on appearance rather than function, hence Unity and GNOME 3 and this article's stupidity.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[AmiMoJo]

Nah, it's just standard Apple quality control. Remember when the alarm clock stopped working? Multiple times? Over multiple years?

Apple Maps, the iPhone 4 antenna, Macbook thermal paste... Apple is just as prone to fuck ups as everyone else, it's just that theirs tend to be hilarious for some reason.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[Anonymous Coward]

Anything is better than the un-usuable Unity or GNOME 3 desktops! Those developers were on crack. Long live to Mate and Cinnamon!

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[Anonymous Coward]

Apple is just as prone to fuck ups as everyone else, it's just that theirs tend to be hilarious for some reason.

Mainly due to their markup for the [supposed] "it just werkz" factor.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[omnichad]

Would you prefer no feedback that the keypress registered? Physical keys give audible and tactile feedback. Just because they were doing it wrong doesn't mean it was the wrong thing to do.

Re: the rise of the eyecandy tards

[Brockmire]

To me, nothing tops GotoFail. Though, I still believe that was intentional since their explanation of patching caused it doesn't fail spectacularly like they claim. But it does mean, their development and QA process is shitty.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[BronsCon]

Well, given that the feedback in this case is a button animation, I must be looking at the screen in order to see it... so the digits on the calculator display changing might give me some clue that my input was registered. Beyond that, the haptic feedback already provided by the phone does a fine enough job of letting me know my input was received.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[green1]

Which is exactly why the first thing I do on any computing device (be it a desktop, laptop, tablet, phone, or watch) is to turn off animations, or where that's impossible, speed them up as much as will be allowed. Makes everything feel far more responsive, and makes things actually work.

Animation is not required in a UI. And no, to those who intentionally misinterpret this, that doesn't mean you don't need feedback of actions taken, just that it doesn't need to be animated. The button turning a different colour when you press it makes sense, but it fading to and from that colour while the rest of the UI just sits and waits for it to finish is ridiculous, serves no purpose, and causes your brand new top of the line device to feel like it's 10 years out of date. Unfortunately it's also the norm for almost all OSes at this point.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[omnichad]

Haptic feedback tells you that you pressed *a* button (if you leave it turned on). iPhone users are more likely to look at their typing finger than at the number display to see which button they pressed.

I know my main Android keyboard lights up the key in addition to the haptic feedback, and it has never prevented my continued typing.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[BronsCon]

Your question was

Would you prefer no feedback that the keypress registered?

I was pointing out that there is, in fact, other feedback that the key press was registered.

After sampling a moderately-sized group of both iOS and Android users, I have discovered that most of them watch the screen of their phone's calculator while using it, just as with the el-cheapo desk calculator most of them have. It's learned behavior, as those el-cheapo calculators don't always register a press despite the key physically moving and hitting the end of its travel. That said, even the fastest-typing iOS users I know were hard-pressed to recreate the issue in this article, even after I eventually told them why I was having them do the simplest of math on their phone, rather than in their head; most of them even actively tried to get it to fuck up and couldn't.

Sad that this bug happened, but you have to be pretty damn quick to trigger it.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[omnichad]

I was pointing out that there is, in fact, other feedback that the key press was registered.

And I was differentiating between "a" key and "the" key.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[BronsCon]

if I press "2" and a "3" appears on screen, I know the keypress didn't register...

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[omnichad]

Most people aren't able to tell which key their finger is on without looking at their finger to put it in the right place. It takes much longer to look up and see what shows up at the top of the screen. I know if I'm looking down, it will be for speed and my eyes will be on the keys.

Physical keypads have braille dots to tell you where your fingers are. Even with haptic feedback, it's a single finger operation for most people on a touch screen.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[BronsCon]

What's your sample size? I farmed this little experiment out to a few dozen people I know and the results were more or less unanimous.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[omnichad]

I'm extrapolating from a concrete sample size of one. All it takes is one to prove the point. Everyone else is wholly unaffected by the lack or presence of the visual feedback - except in the case of implementation bugs.

Re:the rise of the eyecandy tards

[BronsCon]

I must be missing your point, then, and you're clearly missing mine.

Re: the rise of the eyecandy tards

[AmiMoJo]

I'm still ranking Apple Maps. How often can a bug in consumer software be bad enough to kill you? Bad enough that the police warn you not to use it.

Better yet, what prevented people from actually dying was Apple Maps overnight infamy as it became the worst disaster in tech since the iPhone 4 antenna.

Animation is cancer

[Anonymous Coward]

GUI animation is the absolute cancer. It's everywhere, on desktop, in applications, on websites.
Really feels like everything returned to the 90's web state full of animated GIFs, blinking text and endless pop-ups.
If you're a developer, please don't be a jerk and get rid of all the animated crap, please.

Re: Animation is cancer

[Anonymous Coward]

I have forwarded you request to marketing. Donâ(TM)t hold your breath. :)

Re: Animation is cancer

[Megane]

Can we add smart quotes to that list?

Re:Animation is cancer

[green1]

I turn animation off on all my devices, instantly makes a 3 year old device feel faster than the newest top of the line flagship device.

Of course this being an Apple product, they probably don't allow that...

Re: Animation is cancer

[HyperQuantum]

And lack of Unicode support.

Re: Animation is cancer

[Anonymous Coward]

I want to hit the designer who inserts smart quotes into text messages. If I am writing in pure ASCII, this switches the text to unicode, which automatically limits my text to 70 characters.

Only apps can app apps!

[Anonymous Coward]

Only LUDDITES want LUDDITE accurate numbers! Modern app appers want appy numbers that let them app apps while apping other apps!

Apps!

Re:Only apps can app apps!

[rudy_wayne]

A modern APP with a hosts file.

Be curious.

[Anonymous Coward]

Lara Croft wants answers for her questions. She seeks and seeks until she gets what she desires. "I need answers. I need to understand." - Lara Croft.

Really, really dumb coders...

[gweihir]

... produce things like this. They should be sacked for gross incompetence.

Re:Really, really dumb coders...

[Aighearach]

I've never done iPhone dev, but on Android this could totally be done by designers who were given control over the animations and don't actually understand the programming at all. And if the programmers are doing their own QA (for example, in test-driven development that is required) they might not even realize there is an extra stupidity to test there because it is outside their actual specialty.

I blame the project managers for telling the designs to animate, and not telling QA to test that part extensively. It should be predicted that the programmers didn't expect the designers to even want to do something so horrible, and so didn't plan for it. A project manager should understand that as soon as they hear the word "animation."

Re:Really, really dumb coders...

[gweihir]

You mean the framework used is to utterly bad that designers can break the functionality of the code without ever touching it? In that case, sack the coders that did the framework for even worse incompetence. And while many, many fuckups are the fault of management, sometimes it _is_ stupid coders.

Lesson: Blocking UI is really bad

[SuperKendall]

It's pretty funny really, because Apple makes a big deal about how app developers are not supposed to block UI, and about how to make animations interruptible. The fix will probably be pretty simple...

The calculator issue is really bad though. Even just moderately fast pressing of buttons yields input blocking depending on what you are doing.

Re:Lesson: Blocking UI is really bad

[jellomizer]

I expect it was a seemingly basic tweak to the existing Calculator code from iOS v. 1.0 . And it probably passed the initial Smoke test, and if they did see that problem, they probably figured that they just messed up their typing. I see it more of a fail in QA then in core architecture. These blocking events were probably put way back in 2007 or earlier, well before apple guidelines were in effect for the iPhone.
Remember the original iPhone didn't allow custom Apps. Steve Jobs wanted everyone to make HTML 5 Web Applications, which Safari ran.

Re:Lesson: Blocking UI is really bad

[angel'o'sphere]

I found it more depressing that my old iPad 2 originally not even had an calculator.
I downloaded a free one and needed to block its access to the internet on cellular, so it stopped displaying advertisement.

I guess the fix for the current iPhone is the same: download a third party calculator app. It is probably more functional complete anyway.

Re:Lesson: Blocking UI is really bad

[Anonymous Coward]

a calculator

Re:Lesson: Blocking UI is really bad

[jittles]

It's pretty funny really, because Apple makes a big deal about how app developers are not supposed to block UI, and about how to make animations interruptible. The fix will probably be pretty simple...

The calculator issue is really bad though. Even just moderately fast pressing of buttons yields input blocking depending on what you are doing.

I wouldn't be surprised if there was an OS level bug causing this issue. I feel like iOS 11 animations are incredibly slow. The UI is slow in general. I have an iPhone 7 and I find my UI locks up completely about 15 times a day. I have to actually restart my phone (or wait about 5-6 minutes) before I can do anything. It happens a lot more frequently if I am streaming audio over bluetooth. Since this is basically the only way to listen to audio while charging an iPhone 7, Apple has really screwed up. They've gotten worse and worse about cherry-picking code fixes from the last iOS version into the latest. Their QA and development quality has really fallen flat on its face.

I also have an Apple TV. Whatever the latest (non-4K) version is. The newest software cannot stream video over Wi-Fi. After about 30-60 minutes, the stream pauses, network fails, and I have to reboot the device to get it to work properly. However, if I watch the same stream on my iPhone and AirPlay it to the Apple TV, it can play forever without problem. It did not used to behave that way at all. The current state of Apple is just downright awful.

Re:Lesson: Blocking UI is really bad

[careysub]

Being a real nerd I only RPN calculators - I hate algebraic ones - and usually download an HP-11 emulation for familiarity. Plus I need the more advanced math functions.

BUTT IT'S FUCKING RETRO!

[Anonymous Coward]

I and LIKE retro! Besides, I got money to burn, and if I look good - retro - doing it, ALL THE BETTER!

Obligatory 1984 Reference

[Anonymous Coward]

I think the subject line pretty much covers it.

Gimmicky animation is such a waste of CPU...

[acroyear]

CPU time and network time should be better spent on the really important stuff that computers are supposed to do: check for app and o/s updates.

Re:Gimmicky animation is such a waste of CPU...

[rudy_wayne]

CPU time and network time should be better spent on the really important stuff that computers are supposed to do: porn.

fixed that for you.

Re:Gimmicky animation is such a waste of CPU...

[Anonymous Coward]

check for app and o/s updates.

oh, and mining bitcoin. For someone else.

Re:Gimmicky animation is such a waste of CPU...

[Anonymous Coward]

and Emoji's!!!

Re:Gimmicky animation is such a waste of CPU...

[Aighearach]

As long as they show me animated cat pictures at the same time, no problem!

If they show animated Cheetarah videos, a lot of people will even give them a VPN connection so they can plunder all your ports at once.

Re:Gimmicky animation is such a waste of CPU...

[Waccoon]

If software is designed like shit and not properly tested before release, all the updates in the world won't fix a damn thing.

Today's definition of "rapid release" is not the same thing as the old UNIX "release early, release often".

Unable to reproduce.

[Kenja]

Bug status : rejected.

Re:Unable to reproduce.

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah, most people on Slashdot has this problem.

Re:Unable to reproduce.

[93 Escort Wagon]

I have an iPhone 6S on iOS 11.1 beta - and this bug is damn easy to reproduce. Why on earth does a freaking animation get precedence over a button push? More importantly, why is it even blocking at all?

I'm old enough to remember typing on remote CRT terminals which were connected to a central computer over a 300 baud line (or maybe it was 110? This was back ~ 1980-1981). Back then, if you typed reasonably fast you could get ahead of the terminal's display by a few characters... but even way back then, this was a solved problem, those additional characters didn't get lost.

Re:Unable to reproduce.

[Anonymous Coward]

Apple has Lennart Poettering reviewing bug reports now?

Re:Unable to reproduce.

[zlives]

it takes courage to ignore the customer.

But...

[Anonymous Coward]

that animation is sexy as hell!!

worth it

New Apple

[DarthVain]

Here is a 1200$ super computer that fits into your pocket! Unfortunately it can't do math.

Re:New Apple

[jellomizer]

No it can do math just fine. I just cannot register a tap event while an animation is drawing.

Re:New Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

But, but, but... its the New Apple so it is doing the New Maths. The answer is whatever the chip feels like at the time. Apple are after all, based in California, the mental zoo of the planet.

Re:New Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

You're typing too fast

Re:New Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

Everyone knows animation is art and math is science. You have to find "creatives" to do the art for you. And art has infinite computational requirements, so just shut up and get to work for your "Creative" masters.

Re:New Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

and apple wants to be taken seriously as a tech company. LOL.

Re:New Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

Oh, so it's an interrupt problem. Maybe their IRQs aren't setup properly.

Re:New Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

It will be fixed in iPhone XI, where the 128-bit A12 processor will be able to animate the button-fade quicker in order to register your key presses.

Re:New Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

If it gives wrong answers then it can't do math no matter what the reason is.

None of this would have happened...

[Lab Rat Jason]

... if apple had stuck to it's skeuomorphic design principles.

Form before function crap

[Anonymous Coward]

Isn't this a normal thing on Apple products? Make it look good, and don't worry if it actually works?

Seriously though, this is what is wrong with the world today. Everyone is so concerned with the looks and functionality is an afterthought.

Duh

[Anonymous Coward]

You're holding it wrong.

Re:Duh

[Anonymous Coward]

You're holding it wrong.

s/holding/tapping/

Windows Calculator

[rstanley]

Enter "3 + 3 * 3" in any Windows Calculator app, and see what you get! 18! (Multiplication has higher precedence than addition! Answer should be 12!)

And would you trust Excel? I wouldn't!

I'll stick to Linux and Android, thank you!

Re:Windows Calculator

[vux984]

I just tried this now in the calculator that comes with windows 10. (im on build 1707 "creators update" not the fall one.) I pressed the following keys:

3 + 3 * 3 =

It displayed 12.

As for the old calc.exe app, it behaved the same as the old physical ones that didn't queue up operations, and executed each operation immediately. So it pretty much did what i expected it to do too.

I mean, honestly, I don't use windows built in calculators much myself; i don't need the big friendly touch buttons on my desktop; that's not a UI i need or want, and its waste of space; and they're functionality relatively weak.

I use SpeQ as my quick desktop calculator these days. I'm curious what other people are using.

Re:Windows Calculator

[sqorbit]

No, if you type 3+3 and then hit x you get the answer of 3+3 = 6, then you "x" and "3" you get 18. You are asking the calculator what is 3+3 and then asking it to multiply that answer by 3. This is working as designed because it's not a scientific calculator. If you simply switch to Scientific in the options, you can use "( )" and/or other functions to put in a formula. As far as I know the standard Apple calculator does not a scientific option. The user is in error if they want 3+3 * 3 in a non scientific calculator and start hitting buttons.

Re:Windows Calculator

[TrancePhreak]

I had long missed PowerCalc, and SpeQ seems very similar. I had it working in Win10 for a while, but it was a hassle.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

Enter "3 + 3 * 3" in any Windows Calculator app, and see what you get! 18! (Multiplication has higher precedence than addition! Answer should be 12!)

And would you trust Excel? I wouldn't!

I'll stick to Linux and Android, thank you!

Switch your windows calculator to scientific, it will then respect order of operations. Apparently you became a scientist when you learned these things in 3rd grade, you just didn't know it!

Re:Windows Calculator

[MiliusXP]

On Win 10 standard calculator ==> 18 Scientific calculator ==> 12

Re:Windows Calculator

[TimHunter]

On an iPhone, holding the phone sideways (landscape orientation) changes the calculator app to a scientific calculator. Parens and trig functions are available.

Re:Windows Calculator

[rstanley]

Possibly on your O/S version, not any I have available:

Windows 7 in Basic, Non-Scientific mode - 18
Android, Non-Scientific calculator - 12
Debian Linux KCalc in Simple (Non Science mode) - 12

C Programming language Table of operator precedence - 12

Re:Windows Calculator

[mr.hawk]

As far as I know the standard Apple calculator does not a scientific option.

Sure it does. Just put your phone into landscape mode.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

Alternate facts...

Re:Windows Calculator

[sexconker]

This is an accurate and correct description of the behavior of calc.exe .
For my purposes, I'm almost always in scientific mode (occasionally in programmer mode, but only if I don't want to open up a better tool).

Re:Windows Calculator

[EvilSS]

Enter "3 + 3 * 3" in any Windows Calculator app, and see what you get! 18! (Multiplication has higher precedence than addition! Answer should be 12!)

And this is the expected result. A basic calculator doesn't take algebraic input. It does operations in the order they are received from the operator (you). Any basic physical calculator would do the same. It's on the operator to put the calculations in in the correct order. Actually doing differently would be bad since most people familiar calculators would not be expecting them to have a hidden operations queue and should be entering the calculations accordingly. Having a hidden queue would result in unexpected results. I'd never expect a 10 key to keep track of order of operations for example.

Now if you put it into scientific mode, it DOES do algebraic input and does follow proper order of operations. As expected for a scientific calculator (well one of those barbaric non-RPN ones at least).

Re:Windows Calculator

[SuiteSisterMary]

Except that 3 + 3 * 3 does, in fact, equal 12.

If you'd typed '3 + 3 [enter] * 3 [enter]' you'd get 18.

Type in an equation, get an answer to the equation. Type in a sequence of discrete operations, get the answer to a sequence of discrete operations.

Re:Windows Calculator

[eggz128]

Here, have a real Windows calc.exe bug (that's been there *forever*, across all the different versions)

sqrt4 - 2 = ?

Re: Windows Calculator

[Brockmire]

Ah, just like in grade 8, we all just rotated our papers for trig. Oh wait...

Re:Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

As for the old calc.exe app, it behaved the same as the old physical ones that didn't queue up operations, and executed each operation immediately.

In that case calc should return 18 for 3 + 3 * 3, but it (on 32bit XP SP3) returns 12
How old would it have to be?

Re:Windows Calculator

[vux984]

"Except that 3 + 3 * 3 does, in fact, equal 12."

Precisely. The post i responded to said it wouldn't return 12, but it does.

Re:Windows Calculator

[fahrbot-bot]

Except that 3 + 3 * 3 does, in fact, equal 12.

If you'd typed '3 + 3 [enter] * 3 [enter]' you'd get 18.

The Windows Calculator returns 18 in Standard and Programming modes and 12 in Scientific mode.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

-1.068281969439142e-19

How strange.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Obfuscant]

Precisely. The post i responded to said it wouldn't return 12, but it does.

Calculator on XP returns 18. Calculator on Win 7 returns 18. I don't have a simple four function calculator handy, but I would bet that it gets 18, too.

This is a problem of algebraic entry vs. RPN. The former requires look-ahead to know the right answer. "If the next operator which hasn't been pressed yet is mult or div I don't do this add or sub yet ...".

The "calculator" that came stock with my Galaxy Tab doesn't do immediate operations, it records the equation you enter and then processes it when you press "=". It gets 12.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Obfuscant]

How strange.

Not strange at all. That is zero within "eps", and is because they are using the Intel or AMD math processor for the square root. WE look at "4" and know the square root is exactly two because we learned that. The CPU goes through a standard algorithm for determining the square root of a number, and because of the inherent imprecision of floating point math with a limited number of bits, the answer is not identical to zero because the square root of 4 is not identical to 2.

Re:Windows Calculator

[pz]

No, sorry, that's just wrong by the basic rules of algebra. Multiplication gets precedence over addition. (That newfangled idea of a precedence tree in computer languages is predated by at least a hundred years in mathematics.)

3 + 3 * 3 is 12, period. If your calculator is giving you 18, it is wrong, and is the result of a lazy developer not understanding the appropriate operator precedence. Doing correct arithmetic is non-trivial (it isn't hard, but it isn't trivial: the trivial approach gives you 18 in this case, and that is wrong). This is not a question of "scientific" or "non-scientific" calculators. There is no such thing. Calculators have one kind of function, there is one correct answer,and if they don't get it right, then the designer or implementor is at fault.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Strider-]

You're technically correct, which I suppose is the best kind of correct.

However, most standard calculators do simple "Business Math" and act more like an adding machine, rather than following proper BEDMAS order. This is the behaviour that most people expect. Say you're adding up a dinner bill then dividing by 3 to split it 3 ways. If you were to just blindly type in 5+2+3/3 on a scientific calculator, you're going to wind up with an answer of 8, which is obviously incorrect. If you do it on a business calculator, you're going to wind up with 3.33, which is the correct answer.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

Depends. Any calculator that lets you enter “3+3*3” all in one go would certainly be wrong to return 18, but a basic calculator will usually display “6” after you press the multiply button, making it clear it’s executing operations in the order they are entered rather than proper OoO.

Re:Windows Calculator

[sootman]

And the first time anyone noticed that in testing and figured out what the problem was, they should have reprogrammed the calculator to use a lookup table for all perfects squares between zero and <however many digits the calculator can display> instead of using the algorithm for those numbers. Brute-force and low-tech and "wrong" to a programmer but IT WILL ALWAYS WORK PERFECTLY. If complex FPU math loops cause your calculator app to get wrong answers for problems a grade-school kid can do, DON'T USE IT. What's better -- an elegant wrong answer or an inelegant correct answer? When it comes to math, "correct" should always win.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Obfuscant]

If complex FPU math loops cause your calculator app to get wrong answers for problems a grade-school kid can do

The answers are correct to within the precision of the operation. A square root that is off by 1e-39 from the perfect answer of "2" is correct within any reasonable definition of precision.

When it comes to math, "correct" should always win.

A calculator isn't doing "math", which is a representation of reality and not reality itself. It is calculating numbers. And, because the hardware is a physical thing while math is a theoretical construct, for former cannot achieve perfection while the latter can. The fact that you have to represent a real number as a limited sum of powers of two means you can have an infinite number of "numbers" that you cannot possibly represent perfectly.

Your idea of a lookup table would be interesting, if it weren't unwieldly and horribly impractical.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Obfuscant]

they should have reprogrammed the calculator to use a lookup table for all perfects squares between zero and

I realize that saying that process would be unwieldly probably won't deter you, so let's use some actual numbers. Let's say you have a ten digit calculator. There are 10 billion integers that can be displayed (0-9,999,999,999). Amongst those will be 100,000 exact squares. You need to have a table of 100,000 squares and their square roots.

BUT, let's not forget, your calculator can also display 2.25, which has an exact square root of 1.5. You'll want the correct answer for that. There will be an additional 3162 "perfect squares" that are numbers of the form n.5 that will have a display of ten digits or less. There will be another 316 "perfect squares" of ten digits or less that have square roots of n.25 or n.75.

Let's call it 110,000 "perfect squares" for a ten digit display. But, wait, your calculator may have more internal precision than that 10 digits, so there will be more "perfect squares" that you need to look out for. For example, 1.0078125 has a perfect square of 1.01568603515625. A ten digit display can only display part of that, but that won't prevent you from entering it and pressing "sqrt", will it?

Your "ten digit" table will need to have more than 32 bits for each integer since you only get to four billion with 32 bits. At least 33 bits. And you'll need to search that table to find out your perfect square isn't in there.

By the time you've searched the table, if you have the memory available and want to increase the cost of your calculator to include it, you could have calculated the almost perfect answer and be off by only a very very tiny amount.

As I pointed out elsewhere, if you are doing calculations for theoretical physics and need perfect answers, do it symbolically. If you are trying to figure out how long a piece of lumber to cut for a project, use your calculator that gives good enough answers. Not even the folks creating firing tables by hand using calculators cared about 1e-39 errors.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Waccoon]

This is why you use an arbitrary precision math library for calculators. Programmers need to take floating point precision into consideration, users shouldn't have to.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

The square root of 4 is exactly 2. If anything else is presented to the user, it is a bug. And it isn't: The calculator shows 2, exactly. If you subtract 2 from 2, the result is 0, not some tiny non-zero number. If the calculator can know that sqrt(4) is 2 exactly, it can know that sqrt(4)-2 is 0 exactly. It shows something else and that is a bug. Programming is about getting things right, not about patching users through to the CPU.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Cederic]

Curious that programmer mode has that precedence but really it just validates "Always use brackets"

Re:Windows Calculator

[Cederic]

How about (in pseudocode)

if round(result) squared = initial number then result = round(result)

Re: Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

The iOS calculator automatically changes to scientific mode in landscape orientation.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

Most floating point errors, however, are because of numbers not being representable. Things like (1.0/5)*5 not being equal to 1.0. The square root of 4 is representable just fine. Unless you don't calculate sqrt(4) but rather exp(0.5*ln(4)) in which case intermediate results are not exactly representable. Which would be stupid to do when FPU and library offer sqrt.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Obfuscant]

if round(result) squared = initial number then result = round(result)

round(1.5) squared is 4, which is not the initial number 2.25. Algorithm fails.

round (result squared) would be 2, also not 2.25.

Re:Windows Calculator

[Obfuscant]

As I already pointed out, even with so-called "arbitrary precision", you can run into precision errors. No physical device can have INFINITE precision, they all have some upper limit. For a trivial example, take the square root of two, square it, subtract two, and see what your result is.

I think any reasonable user is going to respond to an answer of 1e-39 with "oh, that's zero, but isn't that interesting", not "I have to make a really really tiny shim to put under that table leg to keep it from wobbling."

Re:Windows Calculator

[Cederic]

Well done. You translated my pseudocode into some bugged monstrosity that obviously wasn't going to work.

If the result is 1.5000000000000000000008 and displayed as 1.5 then use some common fucking sense and round it to 1.5 then square that.

Fucking imbecile.

here's a better idea

[Anonymous Coward]

http://thomasokken.com/free42/
with the skin of your choice: http://thomasokken.com/free42/skins/
And for details, http://www.hpmuseum.org/hp42s.htm

Think Different

[Anonymous Coward]

Apple epitomizes innovation. Here they demonstrate the true value of out-of-the-box-thinking ... and it's not the value you'd expect!

Reader math as good as Apple math

[Anonymous Coward]

It seems like the reader who submitted this has similar trouble with math as the calculator application.

I get how 24 is produced as it was the example given in the post however I can't figure out how you're supposed to get 23, 16, or 32.

I'm also somewhat confused about why someone, then asked to enter 1+2+3, would be pressing buttons in any order other than the order they were asked to or why they would be pressing other buttons.

Maybe I'm just getting too old for the new-fangled math kids these days learn in school.

Re:Reader math as good as Apple math

[sexconker]

This bothered me as well.

1 + 2 + 3

23: drop the 1 and the second +.
24: drop the second +.
16: no fucking clue, we'd need to duplicate the first one. Perhaps the author typod it and meant 15 (drop the first +).
32: no fucking clue.

Re:Reader math as good as Apple math

[Anonymous Coward]

Right!?

6 got it
15 got it
24 got it
123 got it
anything else is more than animation mularky

Re:Reader math as good as Apple math

[Strider-]

Maybe it's the result of "New Math?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Itâ(TM)s obvious when it does rhis

[Anonymous Coward]

Itâ(TM)s obvious when it does this, the display will show 23 rather than the result of the first operation..... I think most normal people would notice that when they pushed plus and it didnâ(TM)t do anything, they would assume they have to push it again... ?

I got 6

[OffTheLip]

Does that mean my iphone is working correctly or incorrectly by Apple standards.

Re:I got 6

[Anonymous Coward]

It means you type super slow. :P

Re:I got 6

[clonehappy]

I just tried it too. You have to go out of your way to do things fast enough to beat the animation, and even then if you type 1+2+3 fast enough, it will just show "23" on the screen so you'll know there was an error.

It's not like the display shows 1, then 2, then 3 but still adds 1+23. It's a minor annoyance I suppose, and should be fixed in an update, but not at all worthy of an article on Slashdot.

Not the best calculator

[Cigaes]

If I try this with the calculator on my Android phone, I get “+ Error: Too Few Arguments" as soon as I hit the first +. Guess what is my favourite calculator app.

Re:Not the best calculator

[rstanley]

Funny! Works fine on my Android phone! Never had any problems with previous Android phones either. You or the phone, not the O/S.

Re:Not the best calculator

[Anonymous Coward]

Reverse Polish Notation. It was a joke.

Re:Not the best calculator

[EvilSS]

lol Wooosh!!


RPN4LIFE

Obl.

[Anonymous Coward]

You type it wrong.

Brave, Innovative, Bold, Move

[brian.stinar]

I'm happy Apple is taking so many innovative, brave, bold moves. Their emphasis on UI, and animation, is transforming the calculator industry.

Re:Brave, Innovative, Bold, Move

[Type44Q]

Apple gives you more for less!

Re:Brave, Innovative, Bold, Move

[Anonymous Coward]

Don't you mean less for more?

gmail

[Misagon]

Reminds me of gmail.com's login form which has a similar bug.

If you type username and then Return, the Return does not immediately switch focus to the password field - it only starts an animation and passes focus to the password field when the animation is done.
So, if you type your password too fast, the first few characters will not end up in the password field (or not at all, if your password is short).

Bugs the hell out of me. The older login form did not have this bug.

Re:gmail

[Anonymous Coward]

That may be intentional -- some idiotic anti-bot contraption, readily approved because everybody knows that fast touch-typist are a tiny minority not worth catering for (just like the people who expect their browser's language settings to be respected, and not "guessed" from innacurate geoip).

Besides, they don't want you to login that much. You're supposed to be always logged-in, so they could track you and "tailor" your web experience.

Animations

[zenbi]

I just confirmed on my iPhone. Although, to be fair, if you have sounds enabled you can easily hear (or rather not-hear) the "tick" sound when the operator button fails to notice that its been touched.

The real fail is the existence of animations in general. Why do they make you wait 1-2 seconds to watch a "fly in" animation when you unlock the screen? Or any number of other equally time consuming transition animations. The phone would feel so much faster if you could disable all* of these silly animations.

* Some reduced motion toggles are still available in the "Accessibility" settings

Re:Animations

[Anonymous Coward]

Oh come on. When I wrote my first CP/M BIOS on a 4MHz Z80A, I used a CTC timer circuit to query the keyboard matrix and _queue_ any input typeahead (16 characters or so? Memory was scarce then). 1986 or something? Why would a stupid phone with likely 500 times the processing power not check the keyboard during an animation? How dumb is that? One thing I found appropriate to do is not to do produce autorepeat characters while the keyboard queue wasn't empty: that's basically an interactive feature. But explicitly typed characters? That's just stupid.

I am surprised the OS doesn't buffer on its own. Or does that app _flush_ the input queue after animation? If it did, this would be beyond stupid.

Re:Animations

[omnichad]

The app doesn't use the OS keyboard. The whole screen is a calculator and the buttons are there. And for some dumb reason it won't read those buttons while playing an animation. Despite this, I'm fairly sure that their OS keyboard animated in a non blocking way.

Re:Animations

[Anonymous Coward]

The app doesn't use the OS keyboard. The whole screen is a calculator and the buttons are there. And for some dumb reason it won't read those buttons while playing an animation. Despite this, I'm fairly sure that their OS keyboard animated in a non blocking way.

Same thing: taps and swipes should go to the input queue. Maybe MacOSX can be made to associate taps with objects, and the animated keys are temporarily a different object?

At any rate, we are definitely talking about functionality that an OS should be in charge of. And when an average programmer is led to pick functions that break that functionality, the API is bad.

80085 is my favorite number...

[Anonymous Coward]

Kids today don't know what a calculator is unless someone wears it on a shirt.

Re: 80085 is my favorite number...

[Anonymous Coward]

Creimer afffilaite spam. Please mod down.

You are

[Anonymous Coward]

You are using it wrong there's no bug !

Why?

[Anonymous Coward]

Why did Apple think this was necessary? It's awful design.

Maybe they'll fix the WIFI + bluetooth toggle bug

[Anonymous Coward]

Any bets?

Courage!

[Anonymous Coward]

It takes real courage to be the pioneering company in the introduction of bugs into extremely basic apps. Most companies would stick with the safe and boring route of having your calculator always give correct results, but not here at Apple! We challenged our iOS developers to really push the envelope and think outside the box to find ways we can keep the iOS experience fresh for our users. That is why we are proud to announce that we have introduced a bug into the Calculator app that gives you unpredictable results even for basic operations! You never know what answer you might get! Our critics might say that this is the sort of mistake that even a first year Computer Science student wouldn't make, but that is what makes Apple so courageous for implementing it! Download iOS 11 today and experience this, and other, courageous bugs!

Apple still bad?

[Anonymous Coward]

Simple solution. Don't use the Iphone.

Bad QA

[Anonymous Coward]

This is just bad QA. If the QA team had done their job better, they would have caught it and the bug would have been fixed.

No RPN no care

[EvilSS]

I pretty much never use the stock calculator app on my phones since they don't do RPN. A good HP 48G emulator is usually one of my first downloads after getting a new device.

Re:No RPN no care

[JeffTL]

I use a 12C emulator on mine, and it adds at speed just fine.

Re:No RPN no care

[PPH]

Still can't beat the nice mechanical feel of the actual calculator buttons.

Re:No RPN no care

[EvilSS]

Those HP buttons were so amazing. I still have my 48g and at my desk. I'll be buried with that calculator.

That explains my F!

[Anonymous Coward]

Can I sue Apple for me getting F in school HW?

Something I've been wondering about:

[ChoGGi]

Did they bury the QA team with Jobs?

Re:Something I've been wondering about:

[Anonymous Coward]

yes like the pharaohs and their minions

Reminds me of the TI debacle of the early 80's

[timholman]

Texas Instruments had a similar screwup in the early 80's. After capturing a huge chunk of the U.S. calculator market (TI and HP were the brands to buy), Texas Instruments released a series of lower-cost scientific calculators where the keys were not properly debounced . It was practically impossible to type in a long equation without having multiple double or triple press errors.

I tossed mine in disgust, tried out one of the new Sharp scientific calculators just hitting the market, and never looked back. Texas Instruments basically handed over their share of the scientific calculator market to Sharp and Casio in the space of two years.

At least Apple has the advantage of being able to fix this in a software update.

Re:Reminds me of the TI debacle of the early 80's

[Anonymous Coward]

they also, like, do more things than calculate

No bug. Needless Apple bashing.

[140Mandak262Jamuna]

All those people were just typing the numbers wrong.

Is This Due to Common Core?

[Scarletdown]

My first thought was that whoever programmed the calculator app did it using Common Core math techniques; then I realized if that was the case, the answer to 1+2+3 would have been something along the lines of "Purple, because bananas can't moonwalk."

ah ha

[bobmajdakjr]

the other day i was trying to add my bills together and ended up at 90,000 some dollars and was like "man that better be some fast internet"

Re: ah ha

[Brockmire]

Fast Internet? You should be expecting a bus load of hookers and coke.

The worst is typing in Android

[HalAtWork]

iOS is actually usually very good at prioritizing input and feedback, this seems to me like an anomaly that will get fixed. On the other hand, priority is never given to input on Android. Feedback to input can take forever sometimes.

I've seen text input slow to a crawl, letters skipped, cursor jumping everywhere, words doubling all of a sudden, it's insane. Not to mention 3 or 4 different autocorrect engines running at the same time. And even with all that autocorrect going on sometimes errors are completely missed or legitimate words are replaced by nonexistent words.

Nothing to do with eyecandy, just complete incompetence. There is absolutely no excuse for this.

Re:The worst is typing in Android

[iggymanz]

hmmm, my moto x pure doesn't do those things, maybe you saw a StupidPhone.

Re:The worst is typing in Android

[Anonymous Coward]

LG, Samsung, Moto G, tried 'em all and they all get like this at some point.

I use Android for other reasons but when that behavior comes about it's extremely frustrating. Doesn't even happen all the time but not sure why it would ever happen at all. PITA.

Re:The worst is typing in Android

[iggymanz]

apps with adware / spyware / social media connections / high rate of "phone home" will do that

having more than one spell checker running will

I stick to basic useful stuff, my running my phone like most run windows desktops

Re:The worst is typing in Android

[Anonymous Coward]

I have only stock apps installed, plus OpenCamera, VLC, and NoRoot Firewall.

It's all about UX now

[Anonymous Coward]

The UI may be shit but the UX quality is through the roof. Get with the times.

I don't know how people survived all these years without calculator animations.

Suffusion of Yellow

[Anonymous Coward]

The problem is that 1+2+3 is greater than 4.

Change for the sake of change

[FerociousFerret]

Another "change for the sake of change" bug created because someone wanted to be all cutesy with the calculator. Previous version worked just fine.

New math.

[Anonymous Coward]

Common core math?

Great UX!

[Anonymous Coward]

They succeeded at making a user experience, but utterly failed at making a user interface.

Interesting historical note:

[hey!]

This is similar in a way to the bug behind the famous Therac-25 incident. The Therac-25 as a medical radiation machine which had software which was supposed to prevent patients receiving dangerous doses of radiation. However it turned out the operators entered configuration command far faster than testers did, creating a race condition that could result in the machine delivering over 100x the safe dosage.

The bug never showed up in testing because the testers never got as fast at input as the operators, and in any case the specific keystroke combination that caused it was rare.

Re:Interesting historical note:

[Anonymous Coward]

That and when the patients were getting dosed by the machine, the operators didn't take the intense pain they felt seriously. At least three people died directly from their overdoses. Three additional people died from the cancer they received from the machine.

If it ain't broken....

[Anonymous Coward]

You know the old adage, "If it ain't broken you haven't fixed it enough."

WRONG!

[Anonymous Coward]

I did exactly what you said and i got:

-8.1648465955514287168521180122928e-39

Barbie was right, math is hard.

windows 10 calc does this too

[citylivin]

Man i really hate windows 10 calc i have on my work pc. My workflow for calculating is Windowskey + r , type 'calc' , press enter, and then immediately start typing.

of course if you do this, the calculator takes .5 seconds to open (or more) and misses your first numerical keystrokes. This is because of a stupid animation as well. Simply not a problem on any previous version of windows. Pisses me off damn near every day.

Re: windows 10 calc does this too

[Anonymous Coward]

Donâ(TM)t bother hitting window+r, just hit windows and type calc, enter. Making the default field in the start menu the search field is really really handy.

keyboard

[Spaham]

the keyboard is soooo fucked up in ios11
I can type sentenses, go get a coffee and see them finish being displayed.

it's that bad

Keyboard without type ahead buffer

[140Mandak262Jamuna]

It might come as a big surprise to you young whipper snappers, but yes, there was a time, the keyboard did not have type ahead buffer. You press a key, and till the computer finishes processing that input it you can not enter the next key. M.u.s.t .t.y.p.e. very slowly.

Then an 8 character type ahead buffer was introduced, probably in the DOS 3.0 time frame.

It was not universally appreciated. Jerry Pournelle, the Byte Magazine columnist went on a rant about how this type-ahead-buffer will lead to all sorts of disasters. ( cumbersome I keystrokes into one key without specifying and planning anything in advance. ... You type this repeatedly Could not find a good readable link)

EXACTLY PRECISELY, UTTERLY

[AbRASiON]

Why nerds like us who are "sperglords" disable animation and flashy bullshit in applications and operating systems, ever since windows XP.

I've been abused countless times for it, but at the end of the day, the goddamn computing device should keep up with ME. Not the other way round. I'm extremely fast on the keyboard, I know endless shortcuts, I can get things done quickly, but I need responsive tools.

But nope, we're just "sperglords" and neck beards who should stop complaining....

Courage

[chiefcrash]

Some people will claim our calculator is inaccurate. We prefer to think of it as having courage...

We looked into this bug

[MrKaos]

It just doesn't add up.

Slow news day?

[Anonymous Coward]

WTF mate?

iOS 101

[Anonymous Coward]

I thought they taught calculator brain at Stanford... sheesh

Working up to the right answer

[Anonymous Coward]

They are on the road to the right answer which is 123, obviously. The other results are just memory errors.

It looks neat tho

[Anonymous Coward]

how was this never tested?

Also: it's broken.

[sootman]

This bug happens 100% of the time on my family's two iPhone 5Ss on iOS 11.0.3:

Steps to reproduce:
1. Go to Calculator.
2. Turn it sideways.
3. Type in 3,003,003,003,003,003
4. Press "times", "3", "equals".

Expected result:
9,009,009,009,009,009
Actual result:
9,009,009,009,009,008

Divide by 3 and multiply by 3 and you'll get
9,009,009,009,009,006

Divide that by 3 and you'll get
3,003,003,003,003,002

My kid discovered this while playing with the app.

Re:Also: it's broken.

[Ron Goodman]

That doesn't surprise me at all. It's just rounding errors accumulating. Not the same issue as the article is talking about.

Re:Also: it's broken.

[sootman]

Did you read my steps? How do you get a rounding number when you multiply A by B and then divide by B? You should get A, period.

Luddite here on 10.0.1 happens here too

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah I'm a Luddite it's happening on my 5s with 10.0.1 installed
Apple's qa dept has been on holidays for a while now

Not only iOS 11

[tomacsh]

This behaviour happens with my iPhone 4 running iOS 7.1.2. only occurs when pressing the keys quickly, the + sign clicks but is not registered so the calculation becomes 1 + 23 or 12 + 3.

Hey, new math!

[CarterMeyers]

Lol

does the phone dialer keypad also have this issue?

[John Bodin]

I do not have and I doubt I will ever have an Iphone but I am curious does this also carry over to making phone calls, or did they do something different when a person presses the number buttons to dial a number? Though I guess apple does not expect people to dial numbers that they do not have in their contacts already.

different algorithm

[aepervius]

Likely the sqrt is different and does not use exp(x.log y). Try it in your prefred language implementation possibly .net.

I get 6

[Anonymous Coward]

Just tried it I get 6.
Maybe I'm older and slower.

Box it, ship it, sell it

[Anonymous Coward]

Bang an X after the name, charge a thousand bucks and tell everyone that if you don't buy one you're a peasant.

Money making circa 2017.

It's always been so.

[Anonymous Coward]

On the old PDP-8, the first release of FORTRAN IV, (which was a monumental software accomplishment on a 8K 0.3MIPS machine), a simple DO loop would count 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, ... oops.

They quickly released a 4-word patch which fixed the problem.

Well...

[Anonymous Coward]

I donâ(TM)t think it would be a problem if people looked at the numbers being registered. Then they would see what is actually going to be used for their calculations and hopefully make sure the correct numbers were being used.

Oh, the courage!

[Anonymous Coward]

That is all.

Re: If you post

[Anonymous Coward]

This would never have happened in Steve was still alive!

Smart Guns...

[Anonymous Coward]

And some of the same people who complain about wonky interfaces like this promote the idea of smart guns.

Found one possible solution.

[Anonymous Coward]

Every time I "Go to the calculator app and quickly type 1+2+3.", I WAS getting 3 as the result...then I noticed the little button with 2 horizontal lines on it...seems to be working, now.

Rubbish.

[davesag]

I just tried it, several times, and consistently got 6 as my answer.

Also just to try I did the sqrt of 2 minus 2 thing that appears to flummox windows calc users and the iPhoneâ(TM)s calc happily reports 0.

This article appears to be bullshit.

WP 34S anyone

[Anonymous Coward]

There is an iOS port of my WP 34S firmward. It doesn't suffer this problem.
It is RPN, so not for everyone but it is a very well featured non-graphing calculator.

Pauli

Old Apple

[Anonymous Coward]

But it might have been an actual supercomputer that can be had for a super prize and it still couldn't do math before crashing because of a memory error.